CORRESPONDENCE
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
C
cc: Plan. Dev. Uti1
SCHROEDER AND LARCHE. P. A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ONE BOCA PLACE. SUITE 319. ATRIUM
2255 GLADES ROAD
BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33431-7313
MICHA.EL A.. SCHROEDER
w. LAWRENCE LARCHE *
ALAN PELLlNGRA
BOCA RATON (407) 241 -0300
BROWARD COUNTY (3051 421-0878
TELECOPIER (407) 241-0798
. fLORIDA BAR BOARD CERTIfIED
WILLS. TRUSTS M<lD ESTATES LAWYER
May 12, 1995
VIA HAND DELIVERY
-
Carrie Parker, City Manager
City of Boynton Beach
City Hall
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310
Re: Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD
Dear Ms. Parker:
Enclosed you will find three (3) original letters from Bruce
D. DeLaney, Director of Real Estate, University of Florida, with
regard to the above referenced matter.
We would appreciate it if you would distribute copies of the
attached letter to the City Commissioners for review prior to
Tuesday's meeting.
Mr. Schroeder is in Alabama until Monday and requested that I
have the enclosed delivered to you.
Very truly yours,
:;.~ ..~' r' ~,.'P"~D'
... '..,.L,. '-, _.l.-,JI.. ~ 1....c1
JLJ:lj
Enclosures
(CLIENTS\WINCHEST\PARKER.012)
MAY 12 i995
C. N MANAQiRS OFflC(
------...------------ _..._~".._------~'--_.
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION, INC.
2012 West Uni\'crsitv Avenue
rD. Box 14425 . G,\incsville, FL3Z604-2425
Tclcph,mc: (904) 392-1691 . F,lX: (904) N2-~n6
May II, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
Attention: Carrie Parker, City Manager
City Hall
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310
Re: Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD
Dear Ms. Parker:
The University of Florida Foundation, Inc, is the owner and Trustee of the property that is
commonly referred to as the Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD.
The Foundation acts as the University's endowment corporation. As such, it is our duty to
solicit, receive, manage and administer gifts to the University, The property in question
was a gift from which we ultimately plan to fund scholarships for worthy students at the
University, Each dollar we spend to maintain or pay the taxes on this property is a dollar
taken away from our charitable purpose, instead of adding to the good deeds we are able to
accomplish as a result of the generosity of friends such as the donors of this property.
As you know, the property in question was rezoned to a PCD designation and was given a
commercial designation on the comprehensive land use plan, At the time this was
accomplished, the real estate market, unfortunately, entered a severe slump from which it is
only now recovering, Between our efforts to protect the interests of certain designated
beneficiaries of the original donor of this property to the Foundation, the cost of securing
clear title to the property and the payment of real estate taxes based upon the commercial
designation, over the last several years the Foundation has had to spend well in excess of
$150,000.00.
As I believe you are aware, the soils conditions on this property are less than desirable, to
say the least. Based upon information provided to me, it appears that some 120,000 to
130,000 cubic years of muck will have to be removed from the property and even more fill
than that will be required to bring the property back to grade, all of which will have to be
accomplished at tremendous expense. The commencement and eventual completion of this
work will, however, significantly improve the likelihood that the property will be sold and
developed soon and it is expected that this work will commence within the next thirty days.
All of the necessary applications have been filed and approvals obtained for the issuance of
the necessary permits for this work. It is our understanding that, once the required Letter
,,l, Direct Support Or~<lni/i1til1n f(lT the Lllivcrsitv of Florida
Equal Opp(,rlulllt\ i .\l!lTnlilli\'L' Action In~titutilln
t
-
'WI
City of Boynton Beach
Attention: Carrie Parker, City Manager
May 11, 1995
Page 2
of Credit is submitted to the City, the permit will be issued and the work can begin. We
have made the necessary arrangements for the issuance of the Letter of Credit and expect
that it will be delivered to the City within the next week.
Obviously, it is difficult for anyone to justifY incurring the expense of the site work without
some assurance that, at the end of the day, the appropriate zoning will be in place so that
the property can be sold and developed. Moreover, not having this zoning in place creates
a significant chilling effect on efforts to market the property to prospective users.
The fact that the commercial real estate market in the Boynton area is improving is
evidenced by the fact that the twenty-three acre parcel along Congress Avenue, directly to
the north of our property and lying between Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton
Road, is now under contract. The availability of this property over the last several years
has significantly hampered efforts for the sale and development of our property. Many
retail users were not willing to consider locations without Congress Avenue frontage so
long as location upon the property along Congress to the north of us remained a possibility,
We are optimistic that we are finally entering a period of time where it is going to be
possible to secure users for this property and, as a result, be able to achieve our overall
objective of finally realizing additional funds for the charitable purpose I referred to above.
We at the Foundation hope that the City Commissioners will take all of this into
consideration in evaluating the currently pending application for extension and that they
will grant the extension as requested and thereby assist the Foundation in its objectives. It
would be most appreciated if you would make copies of this letter available to the Mayor
and other Commissioners for their consideration prior to the upcoming Commission
Meeting on May 16th. 1 would welcome the opportunity to discuss this issue with any of
them, with you, or with any City staff member should that be considered to be beneficial,
BDD/ndk
boynton\051Icp.bdd
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION, INC.
lOll West University Avenue
P.o. flux 14425 . G<1inesville, FL 32604-2425
Tdcph\lnc; (904) 392-1691 . Fax: (904) 392-H736
May 11, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
Attention: Carrie Parker, City Manager
City Hall
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310
Re: Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD
Dear Ms. Parker:
The University of Florida Foundation, Inc. is the owner and Trustee of the property that is
commonly referred to as the Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD.
The Foundation acts as the University's endowment corporation. As such, it is our duty to
solicit, receive, manage and administer gifts to the University. The property in question
was a gift from which we ultimately plan to fund scholarships for worthy students at the
University. Each dollar we spend to maintain or pay the taxes on this property is a dollar
taken away from our charitable purpose, instead of adding to the good deeds we are able to
accomplish as a result of the generosity of friends such as the donors of this property.
As you know, the property in question was rezoned to a PCD designation and was given a
commercial designation on the comprehensive land use plan. At the time this was
accomplished, the real estate market, unfortunately, entered a severe slump from which it is
only now recovering. Between our efforts to protect the interests of certain designated
beneficiaries of the original donor of this property to the Foundation, the cost of securing
clear title to the property and the payment of real estate taxes based upon the commercial
designation, over the last several years the Foundation has had to spend well in excess of
$150,000.00.
As I believe you are aware, the soils conditions on this property are less than desirable, to
say the least. Based upon information provided to me, it appears that some 120,000 to
130,000 cubic years of muck will have to be removed from the property and even more fill
than that will be required to bring the property back to grade, all of which will have to be
accomplished at tremendous expense. The commencement and eventual completion of this
work will, however, significantly improve the likelihood that the property will be sold and
developed soon and it is expected that this work will commence within the next thirty days.
All of the necessary applications have been filed and approvals obtained for the issuance of
the necessary permits for this work. It is our understanding that, once the required Letter
A Direct Support Organization h'r the University of Florida
EqU,ll Oppt'rtunitv I Affirmative Action Institution
,
...
'WI
City of Boynton Beach
Attention: Carrie Parker, City Manager
May II, 1995
Page 2
of Credit is submitted to the City, the permit will be issued and the work can begin. We
have made the necessary arrangements for the issuance of the Letter of Credit and expect
that it will be delivered to the City within the next week.
Obviously, it is difficult for anyone to justify incurring the expense of the site work without
some assurance that, at the end of the day, the appropriate zoning will be in place so that
the property can be sold and developed. Moreover, not having this zoning in place creates
a significant chilling effect on efforts to market the property to prospective users.
The fact that the commercial real estate market in the Boynton area is improving is
evidenced by the fact that the twenty-three acre parcel along Congress Avenue, directly to
the north of our property and lying between Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton
Road, is now under contract. The availability of this property over the last several years
has significantly hampered efforts for the sale and development of our property, Many
retail users were not willing to consider locations without Congress Avenue frontage so
long as location upon the property along Congress to the north of us remained a possibility.
We are optimistic that we are finally entering a period of time where it is going to be
possible to secure users for this property and, as a result, be able to achieve our overall
objective of finally realizing additional funds for the charitable purpose I referred to above.
We at the Foundation hope that the City Commissioners will take all of this into
consideration in evaluating the currently pending application for extension and that they
will grant the extension as requested and thereby assist the Foundation in its objectives. It
would be most appreciated if you would make copies of this letter available to the Mayor
and other Commissioners for their consideration prior to the upcoming Commission
Meeting on May 16th. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this issue with any of
them, with you, or with any City staff member should that be considered to be beneficial.
Bruce D. DeLaney
Director of Real Estate
BDD/ndk
boynton\OSllcp.bdd
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION, INC.
2012 Wc~t UniversilY Avenue
P.Ll. Box 14425 . Gainesville, FL 32604-2425
Telephone: (904) 392-1691 . Fax: (904) 392-8736
May 11, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
Attention: Carrie Parker, City Manager
City Hall
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310
Re: Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD
Dear Ms, Parker:
The University of Florida Foundation, Inc. is the owner and Trustee of the property that is
commonly referred to as the Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD.
The Foundation acts as the University's endowment corporation. As such, it is our duty to
solicit, receive, manage and administer gifts to the University. The property in question
was a gift from which we ultimately plan to fund scholarships for worthy students at the
University. Each dollar we spend to maintain or pay the taxes on this property is a dollar
taken away from our charitable purpose, instead of adding to the good deeds we are able to
accomplish as a result of the generosity of friends such as the donors of this property,
As you know, the property in question was rezoned to a PCD designation and was given a
commercial designation on the comprehensive land use plan. At the time this was
accomplished, the real estate market, unfortunately, entered a severe slump from which it is
only now recovering. Between our efforts to protect the interests of certain designated
beneficiaries of the original donor of this property to the Foundation, the cost of securing
clear title to the property and the payment of real estate taxes based upon the commercial
designation, over the last several years the Foundation has had to spend well in excess of
$150,000.00.
As I believe you are aware, the soils conditions on this property are less than desirable, to
say the least. Based upon information provided to me, it appears that some 120,000 to
130,000 cubic years of muck will have to be removed from the property and even more fill
than that will be required to bring the property back to grade, all of which will have to be
accomplished at tremendous expense. The commencement and eventual completion of this
work will, however, significantly improve the likelihood that the property will be sold and
developed soon and it is expected that this work will commence within the next thirty days.
All of the necessary applications have been filed and approvals obtained for the issuance of
the necessary permits for this work. It is our understanding that, once the required Letter
A Direct Support Org':lllizatilll1 !llT thl' Uni\'l,~rsilv of F]oridil
EqUill Orrorlunitvi Athrm,1tln' A,lion Institution
....
.....
City of Boynton Beach
Attention: Carrie Parker, City Manager
May II, 1995
Page 2
of Credit is submitted to the City, the permit will be issued and the work can begin. We
have made the necessary arrangements for the issuance of the Letter of Credit and expect
that it will be delivered to the City within the next week.
Obviously, it is difficult for anyone to justify incurring the expense of the site work without
some assurance that, at the end of the day, the appropriate zoning will be in place so that
the property can be sold and developed, Moreover, not having this zoning in place creates
a significant chilling effect on efforts to market the property to prospective users.
The fact that the commercial real estate market in the Boynton area is improving is
evidenced by the fact that the twenty-three acre parcel along Congress Avenue, directly to
the north of our property and lying between Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton
Road, is now under contract. The availability of this property over the last several years
has significantly hampered efforts for the sale and development of our property. Many
retail users were not willing to consider locations without Congress Avenue frontage so
long as location upon the property along Congress to the north of us remained a possibility.
We are optimistic that we are finally entering a period of time where it is going to be
possible to secure users for this property and, as a result, be able to achieve our overall
objective of finally realizing additional funds for the charitable purpose I referred to above.
We at the Foundation hope that the City Commissioners will take all of this into
consideration in evaluating the currently pending application for extension and that they
will grant the extension as requested and thereby assist the Foundation in its objectives. It
would be most appreciated if you would make copies of this letter available to the Mayor
and other Commissioners for their consideration prior to the upcoming Commission
Meeting on May 16th. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this issue with any of
them, with you, or with any City staff member should that be considered to be beneficial,
Bruce D. DeLaney
Director of Real Estate
BDD/ndk
boynton\OSllcp.bdd
qTU City of
iBoynton iBeadi
100 ~. 'BoyntQII. ~ tJJoukvarti
P.O. ~310
'lloyntQII. '1luIdI. %Jrida 33425.0310
City:JfDll: (407) 375-6000
'.flU: (407) 375-6090
November 23, 1993
Bill Winchester
P.o. Box 1240
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
Dear Mr. Winchester:
Doing the research for the excavation and fill permit recently
submitted to the City, it was discovered that the Boynton Beach
Boulevard P.C.D. was originally issued on December l8, 1990, and
was granted a one year extension until June l6, 1993. Therefore,
the P.C.D. has expired as of June 17, 1993. The approval of the
excavation and fill permit on Tuesday, November l6, 1993 should
not be construed to be a Development Order issued by the City,
nor does it imply any vesting of the property on behalf of the
City. I am enclosing a copy of the applicable zoning code
(Section 6.F.lll regarding time limits on P.C.D's.
Please contact us and let us know what your plans are regarding
the P.C.D. status of the property. Thank you.
Sincerely,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
~;J~
Carrie Parker
Assistant City Manager
CP:smb
Attachment
c: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
Jim Cherof, City Attorney
Tambri Heyden, Acting planning & Zoning Director
Don Jaeger, Building Official
rn
Jlmerica's (jateway to tlie (julfttream
APPENDIX A-ZONING
Set. 8
10. ConditiolUl and stipulations. In recommending zoning of
land to the PCD classification, the planning and zoning
board may recommend and the city council may attach
suitable conditions, safeguards, and stipulations, in accord
with standards set out in these zoning regulations and in
this section. The conditions, safeguards and stipulations
80 made at the time of zoning to PCD shall be binding
upon the applicant or his successors in interest. Deviations
from the approved master plan except in the manner herein
set out or failure to comply with any requirement, condi.
tion, or safeguard, shall constitute a violation of these
zoning regulations, It is intended that no conditions, safe-
guards or stipulations be required which are not within
the standards set out in these zoning regulations and in
this section and that conditions, safeguards, and stipula.
tions be clearly related to the ends and objectives of these
zoning regulations and this section.
11. Time limit. The approval of the zoning to PCD by the city
commission shall be in effect for eighteen (18) months from
the effective date of the approval of the ordinance to re-
zone. Failure to record a plat of record for the first phase of
the development or for the total development as the case
may be within the aforementioned eighteen (18) months
shall result in the approval of rezoning being suhject to
review by the city commission. The city commission shall
direct staff to submit to the city commission an application
which will down zone the property to the original or appr<r
priate zoning district. Following such direction by the city
commission, no new development permits affecting the prop-
erty shall be issued by the city until a fmal determination
is made by the city commission following notice and public
hearing. Upon written request by the applicant prior to the
expiration of the PCD classification the City Commission
may extend for one (1) additional year, the period for com.
mencing platting procedures. In granting such extensions,
the city commission may impose additional conditions to
insure completion of the platting process and conform the
project to current development standards, and to protect
the health, safety and welfare of adjacent developments.
Supp, No. 49
1924.13
fJ1ie City of
'Boynton 'Beacli
f!U.,~L<FYc &aeA.
<:c ?CD
Planning & Zcning 'Department
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boulevara
P.O. 'Bo'{,310
'Boynton 'BelUli, 1'foriaa 33425-0310
(407) 738-7490. TU: (407) 738-7459
June 29, 1992
Mr. Kieran J. Kilday
Kilday & Associates
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 3340l
Dear Kieran:
This is to inform you that on June l6, 1992 the City
Commission approved your request to extend expiration dates of
the Knuth Road PCD, Boynton Beach PCD and Tara Oaks PUD for one
year.
This means that the plats for these developments must be
approved by June 17, 1993. If you are in need of further
extensions, your request should be addressed to this office no
later than May l7, 1993.
I hope this letter is of some help to you. If you should
have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to
call me.
Yours truly,
~~
Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
CC/jm
51merUa's (jateway to tfie (julfstream
BoafJOTtounty Commissioners
Kar,'n T. Marcus. Chair
Carole Phillips, Vice Chair
Carol A. Roberts
Carol J. Elmquist
Mary McCarty
Ken Foster
Maude Ford Lee
County Administrator
Jan Winters
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
February 12, 1991
Mr. Christopher Cutro, AICP
Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
P. O. Box 310
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 ~.
RE: PREVIOUS APPROVAL DETERMINATION NOTIl)CATION
, ADDITION INFORMATION .
Dear Mr. Cutro:
This letter is to inform you that Palm Beach County has completed its review of
the additional information provided by Boynton Beach, dated January 18, 1991 and
received by the County on January 18, 1991, for the four Previous Approval
Determination Notifications. The County has no objection to the determination
of these projects as Previous Approval s in accordance with the 1990 Traffic
Performance Standards Code (Ordinance No. 90-40). The four projects are as
follows:
,
- Mall Corner Restaurant, (1. 34 acres) at the southwest . corner of 01 d
Boynton Boulevard and Winchester Park Boulevard, consisting of a 7,000
square foot family style restaurant.
- Winchester Boulevard Restaurant, (0.84 acres) at the northeast corner
of West Boynton Beach Boul evard and Wi nchester Park Boul evard, cons i st i ng
of a 4,000 square foot fast food restaurant.
- Knuth Road PCD, (13.87 acres) at the southwest corner of West Boynton
Beach Boulevard and Knuth Road, consisting of a 120,000 square foot
retail shopping center.
- Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD, (14.76 acres) on the south side of Boynton
Beach Boulevard, consisting of 120,000 square feet of retail shopping
center.
ai..'
RECEIVED
9/
FED 21
PLANNING DEPT.
r
"^n~Eqll'lr Opportunity. Affirmative Action Employer"
BOX 2429 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA ]3402-2429 (407) 6~4-4000
@ printed on recycled pllper
~/T
/.
Page 2
These approvals are contingent on the successful annexation of these properties
in the City of Boynton Beach.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
~~~
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
cc: George T. Webb, P.E" Deputy County Engineer
Charles R. Walker, Jr., P,E., Director of Traffic
Barbara Alterman, Assistant County Attorney
Allan Ennis, P,E., Development Review~Engineer
,
File: TPS. Hun. - Traffic Study Reviews
/
f,
"
,
//
/
__::...l______..
(17ie City of
~OYlltOll ~eacfi
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beaefi 'Boulevard'
'1'.0. 'lie".! /()
'Royuton 'Reaefi. J [oridll 33425.0310
('itl( }I;,[(- (40;1 ;,l.18 III
'T:,lX: {40;J ;38.;41'.<1
30 January 1991
Ms. Terry Manning
Florida Dept. of
Community Affairs
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
,.
Dear Terry,
As stated in our conversation of 1/28/91, there are two
conditions regarding the recent amendments for the City of '
Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan that you should be aware of:
1. In regard to the Tara Oaks PUD, the City of
Boynton Beach will not allow any development
of this site until a wildlife mitigation plan
has been approved by state agencies; specifically,
the Game and Freshwater Fish Commission.
2. In the case of all amendments, the City will not
allow the level of service on roads affected by
the Tara Oaks PUD, Boynton Beach PCD, or the
Knuth Road PCD to go below the level of service
adopted in our plan. In addition, road improvements
required to maintain acceptable levels of service
for these projects will be required to be under
contract for construction before the City will
release building permits on these properties.
I hope this information is of some assistance to you. If
you should have any questions regarding these matters,please
feel free to contact me.
Yours truly,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Ch.r"L--,- e,,-tJv
Christopher Cutro, AICP
Director of Planning
CC/cmc
Jlmcrica:, (ialnl'll!! 10 tfic (iuf/,trclIm
treOlure
'. COOlt
regional
planning
councn
(
January l8, 1991
Mr. Robert Arredondo
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of state Planning
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Subject:
Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review -
Adopted Amendments to the City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan Including Those Amendments
Pursuant to a Stipulated Settlement Agreement
Between the City and the DCA
Dear Mr. Arredondo:
Under the Council's contract with the Department of
Community Affairs (DCA), Council is to make an overall
finding of consistency or inconsistency of local plan
amendments with the Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan
(RCPP) . This finding is to be made following the local
government's adoption of the amendments, and by formal
action of Council. When possible, Council will make such a
finding by the 30th day of the 45-day compliance review
period. It is Council's understanding that the DCA will
consider the recommendation of Council prior to issuing a
notice of intent regarding local plan amendment compliance.
On December 26, 1990, Council received a copy of the
formally adopted comprehensive plan amendments for the City
of Boynton Beach. A review of those amendments was done,
with a focus on the City's response to the comments made by
the Council as a result of a review of the City's draft
comprehensive plan amendments.
Attached is a copy of the complete agenda item as approved
by Council at a regular meeting held on January l8, 1991.
In brief, the adopted comprehensive plan amendments for the
City of Boynton Beach were found to be consistent with the
Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan.
.
RECEIVED
., \
_ 22 ~:
PLANNING DEPI.
322. LW. martin downs bIvd.
sua. 205 . p.o. box 1529
palm cttv, nortda 3"'990
phone (407) 221_
-
Mr. Robert Arredondo
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of state Planning
January la, 1991
Page Two
If you need additional information or have any questions,
please do not hesitate to call.
s;ncer:eil- ~
:2l M. Cary
Executive Director
DMC:lb
Attachment
cc: Chris Cutro, AICP
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
To:
Council Members
AGENDA ITEr~ 5C2
From:
staff
Date:
January 18, 1991 Council Meeting
Subject: Local Government comprehensive Plan Review-Adopted
Amendments to the City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan
Introduction
Pursuant to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's
contract with the State Department of community Affairs
(DCA), the Council must review comprehensive plan amendments
after their adoption. The City of Boynton Beach has
submitted adopted amendments to the DCA, which in turn is
seeking-council's comments.
Council's review of the information provided by the DCA is
to focus on the consistency of the adopted amendments with
the Regional comprehensive Policy Plan (RCPP) developed
pursuant to Section 186.507, Florida Statutes. A written
report, containing a determination of consistency with the
Regional Plan is to be provided to the DCA within 30
calendar days of receipt of the plan, elements, or
amendments. .
Backaround
The City of Boynton Beach entered into a Stipulated
Settlement Agreement with the DCA .on July 12, 1990. The
City previously submitted draft amendments pursuant to this
agreement, as well as six draft amendments to the future
land use map not related to the settlement agreement.
Council approved a review report for the draft amendments
pursuant to the Stipulated Settlement Agreement and five of
the draft future land use map amendments on August 17, 1990
(see attached). Council approved another review report for
a small-scale amendment on september 21, 1990 (also
attached) .
On October 22, 1990, the DCA issued
Recommendations, and Comments (ORC)
amendments. On December 18, 1990, the
comprehensive plan amendments.
their Objections,
report on these
City adopted the
..
--
--
,
Evaluation
staff has completed a review of the adopted comprehensive
plan amendments to the City of Boynton Beach's comprehensive
plan for consistency with the RCPP.
Council had one objection to the Settlement Agreement
amendments previously submitted by the city. The Objection
related to the City'S decision to adopt a "maintain" level
of service on four regional roadways in the City. The City
standard would allow Level of service E to be maintained on
these roadways, inconsistent with the Regional Plan. The
City'S revised objective 2.1 was an improvement over the
City'S adopted plan, however, which established a "maintain"
level of service for all roadways where level of service
standards had been exceeded.
The DCA did not include the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council objection in the aRC report issued for the
settlement agreement amendments. The City made no changes
to the draft amendments to address Council's Objection.
Council had one Objection to the City's draft amendments to
the Future Land Use Map. The objection. was rtiated to.
Amendments 494 and 493, which consist of two parcels of, land
being proposed for local retail commercial land use totaling
approximately 29 acres. The objection was based on the
City's failure to demonstrate a need for additional
commercial land at these locations and the fact that the
City's comprehensive plan indicates an existing over-
allocation of commercial land use.
The City has prepared a response which indicates that a
shortage of commercially designated land has been projected
in this area and is documented in the Economic Element of
Palm Beach County's comprehensive plan. However, the County
staff has indicated that the data upon which the projections
were made is outdated and needs to be revised.
The City further indicates in its response that much of the
commercial land referenced in the City's plan is located in
other areas of the City where lack of demand and/or the
depth of the parcels make the future prospect of development
unlikely. Much of the available commercial land is along
U. S. 1 and the parcels are of sufficient depth only to
accommodate strip commercial development rather than
shopping facilities which include larger anchor stores. The
City's plan discourages additional strip commercial
development. The City also considers the changes in land
use for these parcels to be minor boundary adjustments,
which are consistent with its plan.
Since these. parcels will accommodate neighborhood shopping
centers which can provide for the sale of convenience goods
and personal services for the day-to-day living needs of the
2
immediate neighborhood, the amendments may be appropriate
for this area. The City is strongly encouraged, however, to
prepare a new analysis of the supply and demand of land uses
within and adjacent to the City and to identify needs which
are appropriate for each area of the city. An analysis
which identifies specific geographic needs is especially
important to balance the local distribution of land uses as
these areas are nearing buildout because the opportunity to
correct any deficiencies is becoming more limited. The
failure to carefully balance and organize land uses often
results in traffic congestion and subsequent large
expenditures for roadway improvements.
After a new land use needs analysis is conducted, the City
should amend its comprehensive plan accordingly.
Conclusion
The adopted amendments appear to be basically CONSISTENT
with the goals and policies contained in the RCPP. Council
continues to object to the City'S adoption of traffic level
of service standards which are not consistent with the RCPP.
Recn1ft1lNlllndation
Council should adopt the comments and recommendations
outlined above and approve their transmittal to the State
Department of Community Affairs in fulfillment of the
requirements of the 1990-91 contract with the Department of
Community Affairs. Council encourages the City to further
address the issues of traffic level of service, public/mass
transit, elimination of the ocean outfall for sewage
effluent, water quality, removal of invasive exotic
vegetation, financing of transportation improvements, and
upland habitat preservation in order to be consistent with
the Regional Plan.
Attachments
3
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
To:
Council Members
M E M 0 RAN 0 U M
NOTB: TJ[B CITY'S
ACTIONS TO ADDRESS
COUNCIL'S CONCERNS
ARE NOTED IN BOLD TYPE
From:
Staff
Date: August 17, 1990 Council Meeting
Subject: Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review -
Amendments to the City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan
Introduotion
Pursuant to the prov~s~ons of the Local Government Comprehensive
Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163,
Florida Statutes (FS) , the Council must be provided an
opportunity to review and comment on comprehensive plan
amendments prior to their adoption. The City of Boynton Beach
has submitted proposed amendments to the State Department of
Community A1~fairs (DCA), which in turn is seeking Council's
comments.
Council's review of the information provided by the DCA is to
focus on the consistency of the proposed amendments with the
regional pOlicy plan developed pursuant to Section 186.507, FS.
A written report, containing any objections, recommendations for
modification, and comments (as defined in Chapter 9J-11, Florida
Administrative Code) is to be provided to the DCA within 45
calendar days of receipt of the plan, elements or amendments.
Backaround
On January 10, 1990, the DCA issued a Notice of Intent to find
the comprehensive plan for the City of Boynton Beach not in
compliance, pursuant to section 163.3184, FS. As part of this
finding, the ADOPTED plan was found to be Inconsistent with the
Regional Plan.
The City of Boynton Beach is considering draft amendments to the
text and policies pursuant to a stipulated settlement agreement
with the DCA. In addition, the city is considering five draft
amendments to the Future Land Use Map, not related to a
stipulated settlement agreement. The locations of the
properties under consideration are shown on the accompanying
map, and the number of acres and proposed changes in land use
designations are summarized in the following list:
5
'.r .r
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
FUTURE LAND USE MAP
CUrrent Proposed
Map Amend. Approx. Land Use Land Use
No. No. Acreaae Desianation Desianation ADDroximate Location
1 494 13.9 *Commercial Local Retail Southwest Corner of
High/3 and Commercial Boynton Beach Boulevard
Commercial and Knuth Road.
Recreation
2 493 14.8 *Residential Local Retail South side of Boynton
8 units Commercial Beach Boulevard,
per acre between Post Office
and Stonehaven PUD.
3
473
20.1
Low Density
Residential
Medium
Density
Residential
4
471
Recreational
1.1
Moderate'
Density
Residential
5
**
*Commercial
High/8
1.3
Local Retail
Commercial
Between the Lake Worth
Drainage District L-25
and L-26 Canals; west of
the Lakes of Tara PUD.
Within Woolbright
Place PUD: 1,800 feet
north of Woolbright
Road.
Southwest corner of
Old Boynton Road and
Winchester Park
Boulevard.
* County Designation - Annexation request has been made.
**(unnumbered) Mall Corner Restaurant
Evaluation
Amendment No. 494 is located on the southwest corner of
Boynton Beach Boulevard and Knuth Road. This property has
been proposed for annexation into the city. The current
County designations for the property are Commercial High/3 for
the northern third and Commercial-Recreation for the southern
two-thirds, while the proposed City designation is Local
Retail Commercial.
Amendment No. 493 is located on the south side of Boynton
Beach Boulevard, between the Post Office and the Stonehaven
PUD. This property is a county enclave which has been
proposed for annexation into the City. The current County
designation is Residential/8 units per acre. The proposed
6
City desiqnation is Local Retail COlDlllercial. Both of the
proposed changes in land use desiqnation (amendments #493 and
#494) would allow additional retail cOlDlllercial in the area.
The City of Boynton Beach adopted comprehensive plan indicates
that there may be up to 198 acres of excess cOlDlllercial land at
buildout. However, this figure may be reduced to a surplus of
only 30 acres when certain adjustments are taken into
consideration. The plan concludes that the supply of
cOlDlllercial land in the Boynton Beach market area will be
sufficient to meet the demand. Since the southern two-thirds
of the property represented by Amendment No. 494 has been
desiqnated as residential by the City in their plan for the
reserve annexation area and the County's COlDlllercial-Recreation
desiqnation would not allow office and retail cOlDlllercial uses,
a change to Local Retail COlDlllercial would increase the supply
of cOlDlllercial land.
Amendment No. 473 is located between the Lake Worth Drainage
District Canals L-25 and L-26 and west of the Lakes of Tara
PUD. The proposed land use change would allow an increase in
residential density from 4.84 dwelling units per acre to 9.68
dwelling units per acre.
Development on these properties would be required to' connect
to the City's central water and sewer lines; however,
sufficient water treatment capacity will not be available
until July 1991, according to the City of Boynton Beach
utilities Department.
Traffic on portions. of Boynton Beach Boulevard is projected to
exceed capacity and no improvements have been recommended.
Development on these properties should comply with the
Countywide Traffic Performance Standards to ensure consistency
with the Regional Plan.
Amendment No. 471 is located within the Woolright Place PUD.
The proposed land use change is the result of a settlement
agreement between the developer and the city. The parcel was
originally dedicated to the City as a public park site;
however, the park will be relocated to a 3.5-acre recreational
parcel within the PUD which will be dedicated to the city.
The Mall Corner Restaurant amendment is located at the
southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Winchester Park
Boulevard. This property is being proposed for annexation
into the city; therefore, the proposed land use change is to
incorporate the property into the City'S Future Land Use plan.
The change would not allow additional commercial wi thin the
city. In addition, water and sewer services are available to
the property.
7
--
--
staff has an objection to two of the above proposed Future
Land Use Map Amendments. In addition, staff has one objection
to a policy change in the Traffic Circulation Element.
Ob;ections. Recommendations for Modification. and Comments
Amendments No. 494 and No. 493
A. OJ:)jection
1. Regional Goal 16.1. 2 is to provide for a balanced,
well-planned, compatible mix of land uses which are
appropriately located, and Regional Policy 16.1.2.2
calls for Future Land Use Maps of government
comprehensive plans to be based upon surveys, studies,
and data regarding the amount of land required to
accommodate anticipated growth, the projected
population, the character of undeveloped land, the
availability of public services, the ability of
government to provide adequate levels of service, and
the need for redevelopment. The need for additional
commercial land at these locations has not been
demonstrated by the city. The City's comprehensive
plan documents an existing over-allocation of
commercial land use.
Recommendation for Hodification
1. Provide an analysis which demonstrates the need for
additional commercial land at these locations within
in the city of Boynton Beach. If such a need can be
documented, additional changes to the City plan may be
warranted.
The City has prepared an analysis which indicates the need tor
additional commercial land. However, the analysis is based on
information in Palm Beach county's Bconomic Blement, which the
county staff has indicated is outdated.
Traffic Circulation Element
OJ:)jections
1. Modified Objective 2.1 allows for a lower level of
service to be maintained on several regional roadway
facilities than called for in Regional Policy 19.2.1.3.
Policy 19.2.1.3 states that the regional roadway
network shall be maintained at Level of Service (LOS) C
or better during annual average daily conditions and
LOS 0 during peak season, peak hour conditions. The
City proposes a "maintain" level of service on four
specific regional roadways within the City'S
jurisdiction. They are: I-95 from Boynton Beach
BOUlevard to Woolbright Road; Boynton Beach Boulevard
8
from Old Boynton Road to Congress Avenue; congress
Avenue from Boynton Beach Boulevard to the south City
limits; and Hypoluxo Road, east of I-95. The City
standard allows for LOS E to be maintained on these
facilities which is not consistent with Regional pOlicy
19.2.1.3. If the City has determined that lower levels
of service are appropriate in order to successfully
implement other city goals (i.e., redevelopment), then
the City would need to provide a complete rationale for
the lower levels of service, perhaps in conjunction
with the submission of a Downtown Development of
Regional Impact.
aecommendation for Modification
1. The City should adopt a level of service for all
regional roadways in its jurisdiction that is equal to
or better than Council's LOS C/D Policy 19.2.1.3. LOS
C shall be maintained during average annual daily
traffic conditions, and LOS D shall be maintained
during peak season, peak hour conditions.
The city ha. _de no apparent change. to adopt a ,level of
service OD regional roadway. con.istent withthe-aegional Plan
Recommendation
Council should adopt the comments outlined above and
their transmittal to the State Department of Community
in fulfillment of the requirements of Chapter 163,
Statutes.
approve
Affairs
Florida
Attachments
9
_ _ _ _ _ _HVPQ.UXO Rll_ J
1 \ I I I
W \! 'il
V I'
,II ,
lei ,
lii'-
-I'
;:,'
I I
~I:
! ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
i ---'1
~ 2'2 lyE H I-..-,
I I
~ I
I ,
I
I ,..J
I /
I I
-.11
,
I
.-11I
al.
I iil
I
I '
I I
~_..-i
^
-
-
---"-~I I
_".UIU" I i:! I
. "'~
18'1 /
I~'\ /
I ..~ ~
: I: I
~! / g /
I ~ I, /. .
I ~ /: !
l, ~;I! /
~/. [II I ~.~
I 11 I ~
"\; ! ~ .~.
/1/ I ~
I ~
/,:. I
I I
I ..-...
i ,'- I,. --r-
'}'I! 'j
t-I
I
I
I
--,
_!Ill
I
r
I
t
/
I
- ""
!
"
'"
"
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
T
.
..
.
.
...
,..
c-
.
",.
",-
iiWOlUAlSfT Rll
'J
...
~
I
'1:- -
III
illl
a I
III
Ill.
...... '------~ -
~._-----
.
.
.
.
.
I I .
~..:
- - .. I:
- .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
-
.
"
\
"
\~
,
-
L.EGEHO
Hal To s...
May, 1989
.........CITV L.1MITS
_ _ ISMl lAEA BllUNIlAR"l
SOURCE: Watter H. Keller Jr., Inc.
._.... Regional Roadways with LOS " !1a:intain "
MAlTER H. KEllER JR., INC.
CllnsuJtin1 fnginHf's G Plant/It's
ClJrl SprfnfJS, FJDf'ftf6
10
. . . .. .I~ I
~~
liZI
I~t\ ;
I &.~ ~
I j:;
rlll/gj
i ;1 / !
. t // / !
1/ I I
1/ ;
; I IV I:' ;
~ ! III I
;! ill I
I
I
~l
,,"- I,. -;
'~'} ';1 ~ ;
I ~ ;
~-I
/"""
-
"
-
-
. . . . . .HYPll.UXO RD_ J
I I / , I
V 'il
I I.
I~I I
I I~: ,
/0'-
15!"
I ..11 "
I II
I , .-J !I
, '-....J
I '1HIlI1II
i ...,
,
~ L... -
/
~ Z2 .vE K ~ - - I
I
~ I
~ /
I
, r
.
I ,.l ~
I (5 "
on
"
'l.
I
I
I
-,
J01NUI":
~
II.VO
I
I
I
I
lit.
~l 2~
ad '"
I' on 4
I on
13 !
I " WOIUllI&IIT RlI
-1
C1
I
23 .vt s
I I '--~
'1,. · "'!.!!...~ J
,
Iii
:Ii
!Il
Ill.
.. ~-__ii___
"
\'
,\ ,.
'.J'
,.
LEGEKO
.....----CITY LIMITS
. _ IST\JDY AREA BOUHllARY
SOURCE; Walter H. Keller Jr" Inc.
CITY OF IDYN1'ON BEACH
DRAFT PLAN AMENJlolENl'S
GENERAL LOCATICN MAP
I
;
~
"l:
~
~
<::l
~
.....
.....
~
"l:
'J
.....
'1:
T
.... To Sc:aIe
May, 1989
WALTER H. KELLER JR., INC.
COI/Sultin9 fn9J/"erS i Pliflflers
ClJrll $prinp. FJoriiM
II
,
~-
,
:
I
I
I
" ;'
El"
Ii
/ '
. ,
t
. - il,bcf'l'
, I:
. I
,I I
II . I
,/ '
!
~IJ
V
, , I
I'
,
I
II I
I
I ......
, '
/1
".-.------
,
i
'.,
,
I
f
, J
- I~
MAP If-E_Y
-1
. --- --- --,-
RESIDENTIAL
~. - . -. - . - - - .- -- - _..- .-
"1.,.-- . - ----~
tii+t LOW .OENSJTY (LOR).",
'.' M.(X 4.84 O.U:7A"'CR-e
-I......... _... .----
_.~ "-----
.......- -.
::::: . MOOERATE_.D_a~SI'1:'Y. (MOOR)' ,.
---=-:. -_~.~ .---..... f - '.~_' .... "'.0 .'-. ~::. -..~ '.'
" 'MAX.7.26 O.U./ACRE ~.
,
- .
\
--- -..-'-'--
~t:~~~~j MEOIUM .OEN.SrrV .- .(MeQ.R)
MAX 9.68 0 .UJ ACRE', .-
','
~_ . ~.::_- ~-:...~ -._ '~_:--=.-=-"":.~7_-"'7- -,~----' =---=:.~--~
.t
_ ':HlGI:LOENSLTY :.O::iOR) ~
. .' '.
,--M~X to.8 O~U.7 A-CR~
, ,u,-
.
I . __
.~ ':
-'- - ...,-,-., -- -- ~ ----:--- --.----
--..---
__'
._', t~OMMERC1A.L,~: i;
. .jl .
j'
.~, ~-,. ,-
._-- ..
" .' ~
--- -.-- - ....-
f.. __ . .~------
m ,OFFiCe' I toe)'
t
... ,
t' ~.
----.
- .. .-:.:---"
_ ~ 'lOCAL RETML (LRC)
,
.,
, , - --.-- - --.-"-" .;-:--'~
~
e
GENEAAt. (GC)
-,-' -~ ...-:--.- .
tN'OUSTRIAt.. (J)
..f
~
. i
~ - t ;
--- -. - ...,-
-'
:,.OTHER
. ~., .
..,.-"
".
~ .----. -- --. --' - - ~ .
. . ..". ._" . n_~__._"'" '
1~S!~~t J~AGRtcul TURE .- ': (A)
!
r-----~. --=--=--w;:--:--
k:"".(~J RECRE"A T10NAL (R)
. ,
-
--.-..'- -----.-'... - -- -
_~. .PUS'Ll:.C. .&u I?RIV A IE (P PGJ).
'GO v ERN ME N:'r A L. / I NS T IfUtTo'N.A I
_ ~I'XEO --~~~--'--~(~~';-'~:, ,t"::'
" . L " ~
'17 -- -- - ---'-.--: :-'-:"'::':':"=.==-:=_.
.
. _ .. _ _ _. _ _ _ ..--. .... " .., I A". T U A"" Q U n 'AI""
r g'
! I "'N'/~~ '^,' .'
~'G
'N", ,r ..",,<
-""':':, " t:>:,_.,.::,,:\..,:_,,:::,/(. '(?"(:/::::::t
'-:l
lJ)'::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::
\1\;.:....:.:..::.:.:.:.:.::.:
~:.:.:.....:........:.:....
1l.ar..............I.....O..,,'.
,...................:..~,..
~..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.::
~c::::::::::::::::::::::::::
~(.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::::.:.:.::
~ .............. . . . ....
~;::::::::::::::::::::::::::
\) ....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:..:.:
::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::
aJ
I
_~:Jr
>-
cc
:-"'--'~N?:__:::>:':~':!;:g~ "J,',,,.:,.. ,T(----
,':irJ
':~i,p:\~2~+~::::'~; -...
. ..'..1 '
:::::::;
:::::::.
::::::::,
. ~ ". '.
.:.::.:.
":":':1.
:::::.::j
'. ..... ~
:::::::::,.
............
'. eo:_.'
:: ::.::.
:: :::::.::.-
. -~. '-
. -.-
' "
n.._ _
"-:','-'
.
... .
..... .
..
w
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
To:
Council Meml:lers
AGENDA ITEM scza
FrCIII: sta~~
Date: Septlllllber 21, 1990 Council Meeting
Subject: Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review -
Amendment to the City of Boynton Beach
COIIIprehensive Plan
In~:rcdu~ion
Pursuant to the provisions o~ the Local Government
COIIIprehensive Planning and Land Development Requlation Act,
Chapter 163, Florida statut_ (li'S) , the Council lIlUSt be
provided an opportun.i. ty to review and cClIIIIIent on
- cOIIIprehensive-plan amencl:iIaents-prior. t.:l thoaiJ: .sd.....Lion. The
City o~ Boynton B_ch has. sulmi.ttacL a proposed amendment to
the State DepartJllent ot! CClIIIIIun.ity Ufairs (DCA), which in
turn is seeking Council's ccmmants.
Council's rev i_ o't the ~o:cllation provided by the DCA is
to focus on the consistency o't the proposed amendments with
the Reqional COIIIpreherusive Policy Plan developed pursuant to
Section 186.507, FS. A written report, ,containing any
obj ections, re<::OlIIIII&ndations for modi~ication, and comments
(as defined in Chapter 9J-ll, Florida Administrative Code)
is to be provided to the DCA within 45 calendar days of
receipt of the plan, elements or amendments.
Backaround
On January 10, 1990, the DCA issued a Notice o't Intent to
find the cOlllprehensive plan for the City of Boynton Beach
not in cOIIIpliance, pursuant to Section 163.3184, FS. As
part of this finding, the ADOPTED plan was found to be
inconsistent with the Reqional Plan.
The City of Boynton Beach is considering one draft amend-
ment to the Future Land Use Element. The 0.84 acre parcel
is located on the northeast corner of Winchester Park
Boulevard and West Boynton Beach Boulevard and is shown on
the attached maps. The parcel has been proposed for
annexation into the City and the proposed land use change is
frCIII the County's Commercial High Intensity to the City's
Local Retail CClIIIIIercial. The amendment is not related to
the finding of noncClllpliance by the DCA.
15
Eva.luation
The proposed amendment has been reviewed in accordance with
the requirements of Chapter 163, FS; Council's review
procedures; and council's adopted Regional Comprehensive
Policy Plan. The subject property has been proposed for
annexation and is =ently vacant. The chanqe in land use
is n.cessary in order to incorporate the property onto the
Boynton Beach Future Land Us. Map.
Development on this property is required to connect to the
City's central water and sewer lines. SUfficient water
treatment capacity will not be available until July 1991,
accordinq to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department.
Development should also comply with the countywide Traffic
Performance standards to ensure consistency with the
Regional Plan.
Ob;.~ions. Recommendations tor Modi~ication. and Comments
htur. LAnd U.. 81_t
A. Objection
NOn.
B. CClIIlIIent
Non.
Recommendation
Council should adopt the CClIIlIIents outlined above and approve
their transmittal to the State Department of Community
Affairs in fulfillment of the requirements of Chapter 163,
Florida Statutes.
Attachments
16
-
-
_ _ _ _ _ _HYPOl.~XO 11I_ -l
,/ I I
I I I
1/ ji'
I ,II I
I., I
I ~'j"
11,
I .. I II
I I ~I:
I
I I I
'-11II ,
I ,.,
i -, -
~ j,ViE"'~ " !
I - -
I
4 I I
~
I I r
I
I ,.1 Ii
I / "
..
"
I I
- - - .. -I~ I I
I ~~
\ 11'1 I
, r I~'\ I
I ! I";.,~
!...,
_...l r I I: I
r I / g I
Ii I I ,
, - If / !
I ~
I~ if / /
" :e
l 1/1 I ~
" ~
~I ~
I U I
I '"
.. I:::l
I -
I '"
....
I .....
~
I ~
I ....
..1 .....
~
-j-
!
n ...ve s
T
II.YO
I ,
--.t ~-
I ~'l
11:1
I
I I
I I
18--1
..
..
4
'"
'"
I ~!8IlT1II
I 1,-
.\:_ _ _ - - -1
'III
II:
9 I
III
ill
. ---
.. _ ;;r-.~..
f
I
I
~ (
! ,;
/ \ 1..
I '-
;
l.ESEMO
NDI fo ScaI.
--ern l.lMITS
_ _ 'S1lJDY AREA BllJICIAA"/
May, 1989
SOURCE; Waller H. Keller Jr., Inc.
General Location Map
WALT6I H. K8J..ER JR.. INC.
Ca!6UJ/iny tn,illHl'S ; P!annrs
CQrl Sprinp. FJDf'I/M
1
... MAP KEY '... -1
. - -.,...- --.. ... -
RESIDENTIAL
. _. ..-. .-.--.
.... -_. .. - .::.
o L..OW OENSITY (LOR) _,
MAX 4.84 O.U:? A1:R-e
-...... .-. ---~-
. .
'~-".-':....-'-
~;::::~ __MOOI:R.~I..aJt~NSr,T.Y " (M.FOR)
,-'MA.X,~.2fe"o.U./ACRE '~ ..,-
-- --~-.'-'''- .".. .' --. .. ..- -
~
~
MEDIUM OE.M.SlTY , (MeD.R)
. '
MAX 9.68 O.U./AC"RE
-~ ',::-: .~_.
. ._- ----
.. ....' - ". -.-- - ," ._.
_ .H,IGl:t, OENar!Y: .c.&iOBl-.
Ml\X 10.8 O.U.7AC'Rc
- -.' ---, -- _. - .. ---. - ---
;' COMMERCI.A.L",
--- -..- -
, '
.. ~ .
...__ ._..ItI.....__.... _. -... .
'; ~ .
,,..
_._ . __ _n .
I... '.
~ OFl=ICe ,(OC)
-,
.- '
- -- ....-----
~ '1-0CAL RETAf1- (LRC)
'.
.. ..-
.- .-."---
~ GENERAL (GC)
--.-.- -. . --.-
~0~~1 IN"DUSTRIAL- (J)
-.---.- -.-
-:
,
\
\
.. .. ..
'"OTHE'R
,-
. --.- - - - .. - . ..
n_.;__ ~
. ,"- ..- -
I~i( . AGRICU1-TURE ..'. (A)
r-----:-- ----;:--
1:;:...'...:1 RECREATIONAL (R)
~"'!1,~ueLl:.C, &. PAW A LE____(1?P,~.1 L__
'GO VERNMEN:-r ALl INST1TUTIO'NAL
--. -.--. .._.
. .,_.._~/''"'"'~ --....-
_ MIXED USE
(MX)
-'
,
-....... ---- ~~ ....-.
, - - - 18, - ._--
. .. ---.
=:=J
=:],
---,
.........J"
. .....,.
-1
't~ \;'r:r:<
w__~~
t It, ,:~",1,:
~ ~.....
\ "",'
,,\
i
... II
f :'--:,:..<;;s~j
~.',:. ~,-:.:.' ,', -:.: -', '/.,..~('..: :~.;~.'~<:,.:.':.~
'," '. . ,",' ...../.~'....'. ._..,....~}\,~,(......
. :,:.~:< ...>..:.:.;~?:::.: :;:.: :,<,;:~~~<:6,:.~~~
, , .,' . , , ... '..', ' , , ..' ,,,,.'S;X;.6c,
. ';'.<<W. ,<,>:_,.>;~.:~~.~~~~~<", '
:::.(~",>:> / (~<,>:,,{;\)~,,:} .r'~<Sc~
"'/ ,."'/ ... )t.' ..v".-'.";<.x'/;/,; ":It
..',,,'." /,.'........(./..."... ,..:>(.r'I'<"/"'<:':
. -: ~.>:/ ..<::'< '>"'::-:>~'::'~::';:'~::~;~" >..(~j~~~~~
. J;.' ,-.:;. ,;<~ "
"t ('~/"~<
~ (,,'.,','
f l \./,' '< '
, .:::.:.:.:.:........ .
:.::::.:.:.::.:.::::.:.::::.;.:.:"';:t
)::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~
00 . . ,0 . .... . . 00 . . .0 . .~
':::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.
'~~llH.liWWllliimlliWli~
~.:: ~:::::: ~:::::: ~:::::: ~:::::: ~:::: ~ ~
~:::::~::::::~::::::f::::::f::::::~::::::-:,
~ J!!!! i i i i i i i! i! i i! 1 i!! i i! i i!! i i! i i! i i i i i \
:11 j j i i i i 1 i 1 i i i j 1 i i j j! i i 1 i i i 1 i 11111 11 i i 1 j li!J
1::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::':i
~~:j::j:1::::1:j:j::j:j:i::i:j:j::j:j:j::1:j:~
(;iiii11ii1i1111iiiii1!i11i11i1iiii11iiiii1i1if
)......... ......... ...
li1:jjjjjj1jjii1j!jijjj1:jijjj1i :i:j: lj1ii~
- " ........:.:.::::.:.:. :.:.' ::.:.:
. ..-. . .... .:::::,
~~_.~_r
,.......-- - ..-.....,-.
I n__ .
~
l
i'
'I
, , 14. .' .
..
.-
--.:'
-.
-
-
-+ t
.....
.J '"~"
~
\t=f~
I'
~'
k.
'1'" -
. .
..!T~,,(....
"'=" --...
:.:~
::~.~.::
.:..:.:......:
:...:.,.
...~ .-.
::~::t
.... 'l;
......
........ ."
...: ........
:.::::.:
.:.~
"~...' .
~.'.. .~ ....
.J~
.:,,~-~
....~-..::
=
19 :.;.;...... ~
......... ......:....:.
. . .. . . (. .. ...
..::::::::f. .~~JJrf~'~
.........~,.. ,j;f J;,:I::Y ~ - .--
::......:. ~CJ~. .tttJ:a;1 _...-~:,"':7-
::.:.....
.~.~:~
,.
.,
...
-
.
To:
Mr. Robert Pennock
-2-
December 19, 1990
90-2 and 90Sl, in addition to the Remedial Plan Amendments, were
adopted by City commission on December 18, 1990 pursuant to
Chapter 9J-ll.Oll F.A.C., and are being transmitted for
Compliance Review. Pursuant to Item ~31 in the Stipulated
Settlement Agreement between the City and the Department of
Community Affairs, I am also requesting the release of second
payment of assistance funds.
As requested, a copy of the Plan Amendments was sent directly to
the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council.
To assist in the timely review of these Plan Amendments, it was
understood that one copy would be provided directly to the
Regional Planning Council, concurrent with the transmittal of the
remaining four copies to the Department of community Affairs.
If you have any questions concerning these Plan Amendments,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
~T~P
Planning Director
MR:cp
Encs.
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(407l 964-7300
(FAX) 969-9717
December 10, 1990
Mr. Christopher Cutro
Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
120 N.E. 2nd Avenue
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE: Winchester Projects
Knuth Road I Boynton Beach Blvd.
Dear Mr. Cutro:
It has been requested that we provide further documentation in
support of the letter prepared by this office dated December 3,
1990. That letter addressed the recently announced construction
programs which will both add capacity to the nearby roadway
system and also divert traffic off of roadways in the immediate
area of the project.
The two roadways which were shown to have some potential capacity
problems in the original Analysis submitted in January 1990 are
Congress Avenue and Boynton Beach Boulevard. The back up infor-
mation shall focus on these two roadways. Addressing Congress
Avenue first, since the preparation of the Analysis, Palm Beach
County has awarded the contract and construction has commenced
for the widening of Congress Avenue from four to six lanes from
Boynton Beach Boulevard to Miner Road. This construction will
mean that Congress Avenue within the project's study area will be
a six lane divided road. This widening will also provide ade-
quate capacity to that section of Congress Avenue which showed a
potential deficit.
There are two road projects on Boynton Beach Boulevard which will
provide additional capacity. Palm Beach County has scheduled the
widening of Boynton Beach Boulevard from four to six lanes from
Old Boynton Road to 1-95. This construction has been scheduled
for this fiscal year. The second widening is from Military Trail
to the Florida Turnpike. This widening is being done by FDOT.
Boynton Beach Boulevard is being widened from two to six lanes
from Military Trail to El Clair Ranch Road and from two to four
lanes west of El Clair Ranch Road to the Turnpike.
Mr. Christopher Cutro
Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
December 10, 1990
Winchester Projects
Page Two
There are two other roadway improvements which are expected to
lessen traffic on Boynton Beach Boulevard and Congress Avenue by
diverting traffic onto parallel facilities. The missing link of
Woolbright Road, between Congress Avenue and Military Trail, is
presently under construction. This link will divert traffic off
of the links of Boynton Beach Boulevard from 1-95 to Military
Trail. FDOT has scheduled for construction during the current
fiscal year the construction of an interchange with 1-95 and N.W.
22nd Avenue. This interchange is also expected to divert traffic
off of Boynton Beach Boulevard from 1-95 to Mil i tary Trail as
well as Congress Avenue from Boynton Beach Boulevard to N.W. 22nd
Avenue.
The projected total traffic at each project's buildout was calcu-
lated for these roadway links. The total volumes for each
project are shown in Figures A & B. As it has been almost a year
since the submittal of the original analysis for these two
projects, the existing traffic volumes have been updated from
1989 to 1990 AADT. Similarly, the growth rates have been adjust-
ed to reflect the 1990 AADT Volumes. Reviewing these Figures it
is seen that adequate road capacity is available for these
projects. The cumulative impact of each of these two projects is
shown in Figure C. There is adequate capacity for both of these
projects.
If you should have any further questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Very truly yours,
~~--;',
Fla. Reg. No. 24068
KSR I j r
Encl.
HISTORICAL GROWTH CALCULATIONS
HISTORICAL EXIST.
GROWTH 1990 1991 1992 1193
RATE MDT MDT MDT MDT
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD:
1-95 - Old Boynton Road 5.59% 45,335 47,869 50,545 53,370
Old Boynton - Congress 7.01% 33,112 35,433 37,917 40,575
Congress - Knuth 12.63%(2) 32,060(1) 36,109 40,670 45,806
Knuth - Lawrence 12.63%(2) 32,062(1) 36,109 40,670 45,806
Lawrence - Military 11.69% 28,002 31,275 34,981 39,015
Military - El Clair 9.23% 23,660 25,843 28,228 30,833
CONGRESS AVENUE:
N.W. 22nd - Old Boynton 5.84% 30,878 32,681 34,590 36,610
Old Boynton - Boynton BB 5.84% 30,878 32,681 34,590 36,610
Boynton BB - S.W. 15th 12.34% 28,628 32,161 36,129 40,588
(1) The 1990 MDT for this link of Boynton Beach Boulevard was
measured at 37,954 which is a 38.7% (10,589 tpd) increase over
the 1989 MDT. Reviewing the relative increase in the 1989 to
1990 MDT volumes for the north, east and south sides of the
intersection of Congress Avenue and Boynton Beach Boulevard,
there was no similar increase found. Therefore, it is assumed
that this 37,954 trip per day figure is an anomaly and should not
be utilized. A volume of 32,060 was projected for this link
based upon a relationship established with this link and the
other three links of the intersection with Congress Avenue and
the link of Boynton Beach Boulevard east of Military Trail.
(2) Based upon an estimated 1990 MDT of 32,060 tpd.
BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
ROAD/Link
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD:
I-95 - Old Boynt.
Old Boynt. - Congress
Congress - Knuth
Knuth - Lawrence
Lawrence - Military
Military - E1 Clair
CONGRESS AVENUE:
NW 22nd - Old Boynt.
Old Boynt. - Boynt BB
Boynt. BB - SW 15th
HISTORICAL
GROWTH
8,035
7.463
13,746
13,746
11,013
7,173
5,732
5,732
11,960
MAJOR
PROJECT
TRAFFIC
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
10,692
3,493
-0-
-0-
BACKGROUND
TRAFFIC
8,035
7,463
13,746
13,746
11,013
17,865
9,225
5,732
11,960
....t'..,.,,..,,tJ..,...I(:. "1"-
....1"-
V'
o
a:
Ji.
O^18
o
a:
a:
w
!I
:2
I
I
I
I
O~
~"f'..
1
o
X
::l
...
o
..
>-
:I:
...
w
...
..
J:
(J
w
...
O~
k. s. rogers. consulting
engineer, inc.
west palm beach, II.
W
:>
..
96-' """
- I
1t)~1t)01" 0
t')0)C"J0 coO
C"JI'-OO ,...("J
It) CO.,... (f) U)
" ~;(1
- I
"'-"'01-0
1'-""(")0 NO
CO<O,....O (\IC"J
o I()N I()U)
M -Izt
,",--,
3^V _ I Z
<0101001"'00
1'-<') NO (")01-
<oIONOCOC")Z
o cn"ltCO<O>
(") - (")"lto
~ I CD
"
"
o
>
...
..
w
:>
"
lS3~~V3S
'-
- ,:I: W -=-
"'''''''01''0 ... :>
,...N<OO 00 It) "
,...Q)~O 10M....
M ,...01 (\I co
",/"'1 0
a:
'" I
"
- I
""'00100
N"lt\'D-MO
<oCOQ) ~M
co .,... ,... co J: l:
N ,... ~~CIJ '"
SS31::10NO:J
:I:
(J
..
W _ I
CD 0"" co 0\" 0
COC"J~O <')0
o 'It,.... 0 (\1(')
NNMO coco I
M ,...,... M~ I
- ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
- ,I
~:~gl~gl
00000(")1
<<)""""0 OeD
Z N .,....,... ('')'It
~ - 'I
z W
>- :>
g ..
- ,
0-.<0000
CDO-'O .,...0
ocor--o ~(")
~,...~~ ~~ 01::1 ~._-'" HJ.nN)t
- , -
---.:...-.
w
!::
III
3~N3~MVl
l:
z
o
...
o
11Vl::IJ.
Al::IVll1lrt
- I
0<')1001"'0
CD 'It co- coO J:
",NCO ,...('1') I-
C"J r-- ,... co 10
N .,... 'It~ ....
,
,
,
3~ldN~nJ.
01::1 H:JNYl::I l::I'Y'~ 13
l:
'"
!Jor
O~
H~NVt:I
N30VH
....
T
$,YOIl::I01.:1
REVISED TOTAL TRAFFIC
KNUTH ROAD PCD
o
a:
o
"
o
a:
..
e
..
...
o
"
W
"
..
...
<.)
u: .
0
IL .
00<0 rn
u:u:a:i:L 0
u..u..t-u..o ..J
<"'o<~ ...
a:a:z~u..
t-"'~ < <(
(!)t-oca: >-
zoa:wt- t:
-w(!)t-..J <.)
C "'-,~a:< <(
Z ~OUwl- 0..
W xa:<~o <(
~ WQ.mOt- <.)
W
...J
0""'(1)0"'" I
~ ~ ;! gl~ g
NNMOC:OCO
<') ""'.:;M ''It
,
dote
DEC 90
ligure
A
."'~,....--"C. 102'"
OA'9
i""'
c c
a: a:
c
z
..
a: ..
w
!I
:I
I
I
I
1
all
If'
o
)(
::>
...
o
..
>-
:l:
..
W
....
'"
Z
o
w
...
all
Jt
k. s. rogers, consulting
engineer. inc.
west palm beach, fl.
~ ,
0<0<001"'0
co 10 "ltO <00
ON.....OO(")
('H,'\<l to) 0 co <Q
_~ ~~1
~ ---,
O(l)IQO\(J)o 01:1
<QCOVO coo
oor-o CO(l)
C\lC\l('l)O r-CO
(I) ...... M"IIt
- ,
98-1
~ ,
LI)"IItIt)O\...O
(1)0)('1)0 CQO
(1).....00 _(f)
LI) 0)- ('1)<0
... -"''Y
- I
II:
~ ,
COO(\lOIOO
r-COMO cO
Cl)LI)r-o ... (")
o 1l)C\l lnU)
M -('I)"lt
'~
3AV z
~ '0
Cl)1l)1l)01"'0 >-
.....('I)NO (1)0 Z
COlnNO <oM >
o Cv COCD 0
(') - M"lt m
I
30N3l:tMYl
~
z
.
.
3>1Ic1Nyn.L
c
>
...
~I-...
~~
:l:
~ ,>-
C\l C M 0\... 0"
...N CDO 00'"
...0) "lit 0 \OM
M ..... en C\l<O
(") -M"lt
-------- '
-.....
~ ,
COCOOOI"'O
::t NO)CO- COO
o <0 CO 0) (\1(")
~ co _ ...CO~
1XI N .... "lt1'0
c
...
o
I
I
I
H.LnN>I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
z '''''''''OJ''',h I
00(")"'0 \00
0000 OM I
!E: <0__0 oeo
N _... M""'W
> - I>
o '"
III
~ ,
OOI'DOI"'O
coen"ltO (1)0
o co,..., 0 <0(")
N_MO ,....<0
(") _.... ('')''It
- ,
llYl:I.L
~ ,
OMII)OI"'O
<Ov<o-<OO x
<ON co ..... (") ....
(") ..... _<0 '"
N ... VV ...
,
w
>
'"
.J..S3l:10Y3S
SS3119NOO
Al:tY.Ll1lrt
01:1 HONYl:I 1:t1Yl0 13
~
on
90r
all
.....
T
H:)NVt;i
N30VH
S.VOll:101~
REVISED TOTAL TRAFFIC
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD PCD
w
>
'"
-=-
c
a:
'"
..
,
~
on
c
a:
c
'"
o
a:
'"
e
..
...
o
'"
w
"
'"
...
o
u:
...
00<2 rn
u::u::a::u.. 0
u..u..I-u..o..J
<c(Q~U:1-
a:a:z....l.Lcc
t-I-=> c(
~I-oca:>-
Z()a::wl-~
-wol-...Jo
r.;,....,:::.t::a::<<
Q ~O()w I- Q.
Z xa:.cc~O<
w WQ.(J)QI-O
Cl
W
....I
.
c
.
~ ,
0'" <0 OIl'- 0
l'D(f)vO(f)O
O........OC\lM
NN(f)OCO(Q
(f) ......(f)"lt
- I
date
DEC 90
figure
B
. -..-..... OJ .-lICt I''''''
0^19
o
>
...l
.,
w lS3l::t:J...3S
>
..
~
r 98-1 ...
~ ,
IU 00<00001<00 "
> <":I CCI <":10 100
"" <":IlOOom<":l
10....<0.... <":IfD ~ ,
· ~r "'''''''01.0 :J:
....N<OO 00 I-
....m<o:tO 10(') It)
~ (') I'm NCO ....
(') -(')'<o:t
,
o
a:
o
a:
a:
w
!I
21
I
I
!
all
~.,.....
...
..
o
)(
"
...l
o
..
>-
:J:
...
IU
...
""
:r
o
w
...l
all
71
k. s. rogers. consulting
engineer. inc.
west palm beach, fl.
~ I
"~"'ol~o
,...m(')O 00
<0_,...0 m(')
O....IOC'Iol 1t)(D
<":I -(').....
I
3^Y
o
%
'"
'"
,%
<O~"'o;....oo
""(1)<":10 00 ~
(0....,...00:)(') >-
0_1llC\4 lOCI) 0
(') (')1m
~--,
o'<o:tfDoloO
fD_'<o:tO <"0
0",,""0 (')(')
C'Iol.....(')O OfD
CO) ....-..........
~ I
3:JN3l::tM...1
~
%
,
,
3}4ldNl::tn.l
/
all
1''''''
-----
all
o
...l
o
11Vl::t.l
~ ,
OfDlO 0 I~ 0
CO<OfQ- - 0
fQ.....CX) 0('1)
<":I ,... C'Iol co
<" _ <o:tv
I
~ I
<00001"'0
% ('11.....<0-,...0
o <011)<7) ('11(1)
-< cO........ ('I,lCO:r;
~ C'Iol .... .....10
~ I
01''''01'''0
coco<o:to (7)0
OCOl'O .....<?
N"ltC":lO OCl)
(l') ........''It''lt
~:I~ - I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
% "'''''''OI~6 I
o 0,.......0(7)0
00000<":1 I
!E CO('l,l.... o....co
>- C\4 _....(')<o:tw
o - I~
'"
en
w
I-
gj
~~ H.lnN}4
~ I
0"lt<D0100
CO(7)<o:to 00
o<o:t,...o <":Ie?
('11(')(1)0 (7) co
(I) ........ (I)"lt
~ ,
Ol::t H:JN...l::t
"or
all
~
T
HONVl::t
SS311"NOO
...
...l
o
"
Al::tV.lI1IW
:J:
...
'"
l::tIV,:J 13
~
'"
N39...H
S.... 01 l::t 01.:1
REVISED TOTAL TRAFFIC
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD PCD
AND KNUTH ROAD PCD
w ~
~ ~
o
a:
'"
'"
~
'"
o
a:
o
..
o
a:
..
':!
w
"
""
...l
o
u:
...
00<2 en
--a:... 0
u..u.......u..0..J
LL. u.. <(_
c(c(C a: I.L.....
a:cr:z.....l.L<
.....I-~ <(
o.....oocr:>
zoa:w.....t:
-wC!)l-...Jo
c.......,~a:<<
Z ~ouw.....a..
wxcr:<2::o<(
owQ..[Qo.....o
w
....
o
.
~ I
('I,lco(')ol"'o
0(')....0100
00000<":1
<0........00(0
('I,l ........ (').....
date
DEC 90
figure
C
,~
K,S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(407) 964-7300
(FAX) 969-9717
June 12, 1990
Mr. Timothy Cannon, Acting Director
Planning Department
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD
Dear Mr. Cannon:
Please accept this letter as an Addendum to the Traffic Impact
Analysis, Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD, dated January 30, 1990
which was or iginall y prepared by this office. The Addendum has
been prepared in accordance with the letter report addressed to
you by Walter H. Keller Jr., P.E. dated May 29, 1990.
The following points discussed in Mr. Keller's letter have been
addressed as follows:
1. Traffic Counts - This office did perform field counts of
roadway links where there were no established count stations. A
summary of these counts are shown in the attached Appendix G.
2. Mall Road - The existing and projected traffic volumes on
Mall Road are shown on the revised Figures 2 and 4.
3. Woolbriaht Road Extension According to an analysis pre-
pared by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) , the exten-
sion of Woolbright Road between Congress Avenue and Military
Trail will cause the traffic on Boynton Beach Boulevard between
Congress Avenue and 1-95 to reduce by 3,000 trips per day and
will reduce the traffic on Congress Avenue between Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Woolbright Road by 4000 trips per day. The total
traffic volumes as shown in Figure 4 for Boy~ton Beach Boulevard
and Congress Avenue have been adjusted to reflect this irtforma-~
tion.
RECEIVED
JUN 14 1990
PLANNING DEPT.
-
Mr. Timothy Cannon, Acting Director
Planning Department
City of Boynton Beach
June 12, 1990
Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD - Addendum
4. Siqnificant Links
which were identified as
revised Figure 4.
The projected traffic on the links
missing by Mr. Keller are shown in the
5. Trip Distribution and Assianment This office does not
agree with Mr. Keller's comments concerning the distribution in
the Lawrence Road I Mil i tary Trail corridor north of Boynton
Beach Boulevard. However, a revised distribution and assignment
was performed as requested by Mr. Keller. This revised assign-
ment is shown in the revised Figures 3 and 4. This revised
assignment does show two links of Military Trail with Significant
Impacts, however, there is adequate capacity to accommodate this
additional traffic.
6. Boynton Beach Boulevard The section of Boynton Beach
Boulevard between Military Trail and Jog Road is shown as having
a widened capacity of 46,400 trips per day (six lane divided).
7. E~~k_HQg~_YQlgm~~ This office did perform peak hour
turning movement field counts at the intersection of Boynton
Beach Boulevard and Mall road. The field count sheet is shown in
Appendix G. The project enter and exit volumes as shown in
Figure 5 total 685 trips which is the calculated P,M. peak hour
volume.
Reviewing the total volumes as shown in Figure 4 with the crite-
ria established by the City of Boynton Beach, this project meets
the approval criteria with the exception of the link of Boynton
Beach Boulevard, between Old Boynton Road and 1-95. Until this
1 ink of road is reI ieved by the construction of the N. W. 22nd
Avenue interchange with 1- 95, some temporary congestion on this
link can be expected. .
Very truly yours,
~/ .~
~~YZ .~
K.S. RaG S, P.E.
Fla. R . No. 24068
RECEIVED
JUN 14 1990
PLANNING DEPT.
KSR/jr
Encl.
CC: Mr. Walter H. Keller, Jr., P.E.
Mr. Kerry Kilday, Kilday & Associates
APPENDIX G
FIELD COUNTS PERFORMED
1. Knuth Road approximately 75 feet south
of Boynton Beach Boulevard:
Count:
Date:
2,042 tpd
Jan 22/23, 1990
2. Knuth Road approximately 100 feet north
of Boynton Beach Boulevard:
Count: 668 tpd
Date: Jan 22/23, 1990
3. Mall Road approximately 100 feet north
of Boynton Beach Boulevard:
Count: 4,135tpd
Date: Jan 22/23, 1990
NOTES:
(1) All counts were performed by staff members of K.S. ROG-
ERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC., with junior counters.
(2) These counts, which were performed during the peak
season, were not factored to AADT volumes due to the lack of
comparable data. .
R.ECEIVED
JUN
1 <'/ ]~~I)
PLAN^' , '
~
O^lB '* w lS3l:f::l'V3S
*-I:! >
0 "10 ,'* '"
> "'0
..- -'" -I"
"- .. ..-
~ m ":
f-'" 96-1
w
" "'0
'" "'0
~'"
J: W ~
tlg~ .... > ~
'" '" *.
-
T
'* -'"
- -
-r "'I" ;f'~1;; 0
~O
-'" "'", ".. a:
"'.. "'- M
'"
'" J: *
_10 "'10 010 0 01" T
..0 '" "I"
"'0 "0 "'.. ;t "''' ;t "'0
,,'" "'''' "'''' w ,,'"
m "'.. OIl .... OIl
0 0 3^V '* Z SS3l:f8NO~
a: a: 11)100 ~I"
_0.... 010 ,,'" 0
_"'z "0 "," a:
> ..'"
0 all 0
0 m
z 11'V~ E9~ I '"
" * 0
a: " "'[0 I a:
w '" ~o *1-
~I "1- -'" I
"'~ "'" 0.. _ *
::! ..- '" en
I 0" H'lnN~ I 101;;
"'-
I '" I
I "'1- 01" ;:;1;;
'" 1- ..'" 0)<0...0- I '"
i "1- ~..
"'M "'" e
"'- ,,- I
0" 30N3"MV1 I
~r
..'" I
"'-
'" M\.. I
0"
"1- "'1- ~.. I
"'~ ..~ z
0 I
"'.. .... ..
"'"' ;t 0 z 'T w .. REC~ lYE'
"'I" z "'I" .. > "'0 > 0
0"' 0 0
;;1" ".. "'" '" "
m
i 11'Vl:fl At:f'V ll1t~
~I" JUN 1990
.... T A
"'.. ..'"
,,- J:
'" ....
'" PLANNII\G DEP
"1- -
... ..~
0 w
.. 01::1 H:JN'Vl:f ~rV10 13 a:
x '"
:J J: ..
.. 0 ....
0 "1- W.... 0
.. W "'M O~O '"
> .. ..
J: -..'" ~
"0"
0" ~ > ~ ....
Dor 0:0.... z
* .... .. z '"
"I;; .... 0 '" 2 0
0 OJ:O ..
"- WcnU:: Z '"
z , w - e UJ
w o a: Z Z
(!) a:J:" OIl :J
, W Q.I-cn ~ ..,
, 0" H~NVt:f N39'VH ...J -
-
r c
"''' ~*
:: .. UJ
!!2
>
UJ
a:
.'I'..'f.('."r;......r\ "lOIn
J/.
3)4ldNt:lnl
T
S,VOIH01.;1
k, s, rogers, consulting
en9lneer, inc
west palm beach, fL
DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC
date
JAN 90
figure
3
,
-
G^ 18 W lS3~~OS
>
0 <
>
-'
---- III
...... ./ ......
""P"'" r 96-1 ......V "-
,
w ...."'1"'0 '..: ~
:> come? -0
"" col'-m fOO
(') (I') coO ~
, .... _10M 1: W
llloor ( , >
I- --.:::::....
0(1)'" 0 on <
GOIO..... ... C) -
":F: \" ,
...."llllO
NC'Il(') (')0
CDQ!(')N.... 0
.... m INfO
to) "'1 "
,.,
N
,
0"'''1'''0
CCI U')N CD..,. 1: ,..,Oh- a)O
CD CDCDQ) \ () .-CD..,N"
IN -....... < It) ,..,C?U) ;!: ;!:
, W N ",,,
III , '" '"
0 3h. z , SS3~"NO~
0 0 "''''''r
" " 10100(\:0
I- (')(\1....,...... 0
Z .....Na)....O "
,. N "'..
0 ,
a~ 0
0 III ~:<:':>:':-1 <
Z , 1'VW ~i~ I 0
N
N "''''~''O I "
" C01' coo
W (')_ "'"0 I
~I _ "0 ""'N co-
" - -'" .. ..en
I '\ a~ HlnN)I I
I , i
I 0"'''100 ,
a)m_COo "'0"1"0 I
i <D mOO- a)(1) 0 It) 0 <
co N_M (')a)-(')"" ~
-- ...._CO....<D I
, .. "'..
,
a~ 3:)N3!::1MVl o,,~~ I
Ill.. ...., I
COM CD_
, co (\1-('1') I
"1ll~~0 -- I
, 0"'''100
_CD(D 0 NOMOO I
..,. ....<'11- ..,.C\lNGht
'" N'" Z
-- , 0 .......,..,(1,1<0
, 1Ol"SC") "'0 N ",,, I
~~~;~ 0 I- , U.
;!: Z W -' W
Z C'Il 10 COG) ~ ,. > 0 '"
or-..... N ... C")'" 0 < 0 <
" , III -'
-' 11Vl::l1 .Al:IV 1111 v.!
7 I. ,
""'TO
(')..,.-mO 1:
Q)N"'"lt)....
o ....coco l-
N _CO).... on
Ill"""'" 0 I -
" OIDIO NO
0 W _11)10 C'Il""
-' IN N lOCO a~ H:)NV!::I 1::11"'10 13
x "" IN .... (')..,.
::> :r , ;!:
-' () '" 2
0 , u. W
.. w O"'''\", 0 u. "
,. -' omNNO ()()< ::>
:r 1t)_t?O.... - -" -'
o M'OtCO ~~I-
... ...(\1.... () 0
a~ oor , <<0 ;;: >
,,"z u. O.
1-1-::> < -'0
01-0 " O' 0
I-
Z()" 1:'" '"
0 -WO -' "'0
I-~", < UJ
Z ~ou I- ~-' Z
W x"< 0 1:1- ::>
, , a~ H:JNVl:I N3DVH (!) W"1ll I- - < -,
W -
..J 0"'T6 -
0
,... CD'" CD 0 UJ
... CD.... N '" '"
10 ....... 0
-< IN _II').... >
, UJ
.,...." , .'."''''''.M'~_' \'.''''~
Ji.
3)11 d Nt:tn 1
T
s. V 011::101.:1
k,~, roger~, con~ulting
engineer, inc.
we~t palm beach, fL
TOTAL TRAFFIC
dote
JAN 90
figure
4
a:
~
Kilday & Aseociatas
Landscape Architects/ Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach. Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 . Fax: 1407) 689-2592
DEe 7 m~
PLANNING DL'T.
I
?/ r"( c'F J?:>.'y,JT,-,j :C>e=;;oC>....c,-r!-
FL-Ar-kj,J",'7 C>EF'r
ATT "AF< G- t-!f2./ <"
WE TRANSMIT
.-: '--, 7,z2-c'
DATE/:2- - tf:;;. -- <; r)
PROJECT NAME &.,y~,...,.J
PROJECT NUMBER 7'1'7., "5'
,
,
A--D. !:rlwn-/ P",.6
,
7'7'7. f
o HEREWITH
o UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA
THE FOllOWING
o PRINTS 0 SPECIFICATIONS 0 ADDENOUM
OTRACINGSISEPIAS 0 SUBMITTALS 0 CHANGE ORDER
~1;~~D~~~~8~~~~ ~;E~ ~~=T'-
ACTION CODE:
D FOR APPROVAL 0 FOR REVIEW & COMMENT
~OR YOUR USE ~AS REOUESTED
,
A REVIEWED
e. NOT REVIEWED
C REVIEWED & NOTED
o RESUBMIT
E DO NOT RESUBM'T
F RESUBMIT FOR FilES
I
DATE
:2-( / /<",0,'7
DRAWING
OR ITEM NO
DESCRIPTION/REMARKS
ACTION
CODE
NO OF
COPIES
/-;J? /VI (J,,_ '-
~-
L;:v.J.-::,
/.:;,/>>,d/?~-4~ ~4~ IrJZ>~;'S7.L"2./P-L-
U.S/- ;254''-'/=-^''L=_-/7'S
i
/ - -
P".~'r-<"-"/V, _._ /-I_E/V1E'i--ff 091-
/c>~/"/ T 7 ?'~.r'-ri.f-?r""./.==-r-I.i=/~/""""';"=
P~I BE~../
P::-A--/
I
,AVD5-Hl::d.J1vl TO MA~r A~-E:$ p:>(
TJ-iO/YfPso',...J ?e>"/C:S~L..f:J'7 1 /.JL-, *
*7Ji.t5 ADZ:::>~;-/DUJo>1 5...JM~1Z-IZ.GE5> ~OP/L?MI"-
e<.-i!!E'NfL?'N'T -I 4/:zN-1 J-hL..i- =T4<::>, - S"ec:
FA<>7~ 2..
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED. KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE
COPIES TO
WITH ENCLOSURE
o
o
o
o
o
FilE CODE
SHOP DRAWING DIV
I
SIGNED c::::.-/ P -<-__ f 4 J ~;;;T /.k=-
''Ilie City of
13oynton 13eac/i
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beach 'Boulevard
1',0. 'Bo{31O
'Boynton 'Beach, 'f[orid'a 33425,0310
City J{a[[: (40i) i34,8111
'f!U: (40i) i38,i459
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
December 19, 1990
Mr. Robert Pennock, Chief
Bureau of Local Planning
Div. of Resource planning & Management
State of Florida Dept. of Community Affairs
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
RE: Transmittal of Adopted comprehensive Plan Amendments
Dear Mr. Pennock:
Enclosed you will find four copies of the following: A revised
Future Land Use Map, Adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendments, and
response to the Department of Community Affairs' Objections,
Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report. The Plan Amendments
and ORC response is organi~ed as shown in the sections listed
below:
1) section 1 - includes the Remedial Plan Amendments adopted
pursuant to the Stipulated Settlement Agreement, and
corresponding ordinance,
2) section 2 - includes the list of Findings Which Provides
Basis For Adoption of proposed Amendments (response to ORC) ,
and related plan amendments and ordinances,
3) Section 3 - includes those adopted Land Use Plan Amendments
and corresponding ordinances as previously reviewed and
without objections, recommendations, and comments, and
4) Section 4 - simply includes the adopted revision to
Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.l6.l to allow adult
entertainment establishments within the Industrial Land Use
Category.
The Comprehensive Plan Amendments, as referred to as Amendments
5111lcrica~' ~latcuJaY to t/ie (jul/<tream
,.
.
~-
no additional commercial land is needed at the subject sites
based on the methodology used to allocate commercial acreage
(which includes all commercial lumped together/such as office.
personal services, hotels/motels, nursing homes and ACLF's,
marine commercial and other miscellaneous uses in commercial
districts) in the City's Comprehensive Plan is mu~h too generic
an approach. Site specific analysis is required to make such a
determination.
Given the commercial categories comprising all commercial land
uses within the City of Boynton Beach are lumped together in the
Comprehensive Plan (particularly on the supply side - ACLF's,
nursing homes, marine commercial, etc.) and the fact that Boynton
Beach as well as Palm Beach County used supply and demand figures
bas ed, 0 n a ere age rat her t h a,n 0 n s qua r'" e fee tin the i r
Comprehensive Plans. our response is based on 91"'055 acreages,.
even though, as a1 ready pointed out. we bel ieve this approach is
too generic and a site specific analysis for particular types of
commercial uses on a square footage basis is more appropriate.
In the Economic Element of Palm Beach County's Comprehensive
Plan, the trade area of the subject sites falls within both
Planning Areas 5A and 5B (subject sites in Planning Area 5B). In
both tKese Planning Areas, the Economic Element indicates that a
shortfall in commercial acres exists. In Planning Area 5B,
commercial land use needs are estimated at 1,153 acres in 1990,
while occupied commercial acres* are estimated at 1.042 - a
supply shortfall of 111 acres,':" In Planning Area 5A (located to
the direct west of 5B - predominantly unincorporated Palm Beach
County), commercial land use needs are estimated at 310 acres in
1990, while occupied commercial acres* are estimated at 224 - a
supply shortfall of 86 acres=,
The approach taken by CH2M Hill (the County's Economic
Consultan~) was to estimate the relationship between population
and commercial development using an input-output model, and after
making adjustments to reflect anticipated changes in demographics
and employment character, they estimated future demands for
commercial lands as a function of projected levels of population,
It is also important to point out that the analysis performed by
CH2M Hill recommended an additional 5 year inventory above
current needs be permitted/designated in each Planning Area to
allow time for the development process to occur. Therefore, the
1995 recommended acreage figures of 1,303 acres in 5B and 502
acres in 5A are indicated in terms of what should be allowed to
be designated and zoned for development during 1990, which
serves to increase the supply shortfall and supports the results
of our market analyses.
* Occupied commercial acres includes all developed, zoned or
designated commercial land.
..~
.. V"""D
nU('T;- b
.lI:'t...L< ~,," ,c
DE.C l' 1990
PLANNiNG DEPT.
<I
, !,~, ~;.?i
,......"
EXHIBIT H
-
_Addendum to Mar~et
Boynton Beach
Analyses by Thompson Consulting,Inc. for
and Knuth Road P.C.D.'s
.13..9.YD.,j:.<:JD.....I3."''"',g..lJ......c:;.9..rn..I?T..'''h'''D'3.,j,Y.'''..P.l..:'''l ..,c:;9D..S..i..<:I"'T,'"',.j:,,j,.<Jn,?.,..,r.:..'" 19...j:..~,sL..,1:,9.
,c;,9.I11.,rr1,,,.!:.g,.j,.<l.l,,...cL,,.,rr1,<lD,,cJ,;,,;,,LJ..P..P..J,y :
The subject requests conform with Policy 1.19.6 which indicates
that subsequent to Plan adoption the City should not allow
commercial acreage which is greater than the demand which has
been projected, lj,n..!.,,,,?..';, it can be demonstrated that a geographic
need exists which cannot be fulfilled by existing commercially-
zoned property,
Within the trade area (refined from the 1-3 mile radius normally
associated with a neighborhood/community sized shopping center,
factoring in physical barriers to access such as roads/canals, as
well as shopping patterns and the location of existing
competitive/comparable uses). all existing competitive/comparable
space as well as approved/in process space and zoned property was
accounted for in the supply side of the market analyses. Within
the same trade area, demand was derived based on estimated retail
space per capita figures and the estimated population in the
trade area. The retail space per' capita figures ',1.Jere developed
using retail sales data compiled for Palm Beach County by the
State 'of Flol'ida (by retail use classifications) supplemented
with comparable data from Sales and Marketing Management's Survey
of Buying Power, and sales per square foot for the same retail
use classifications from the Urban Land Institute. A comparison
of estimated demand versus supply within the trade area
(geographic area) clearly indicated that the proposed centers
could be supported in base year 1990.
Estimated Demand = 3.933,598 square feet+
Estimated Supply = 3,378,430 square feet+
Estimated Supply Shortfall ~ 555,168 square feet~
In addition, with projected population increases in the trade
area to 92.801 by 1995, an estimated 4.580.758 square feet could
be supported in the trade area which extends more than 2.0 miles
west of the Knuth Road (western corporate limits of the City of
Boynton Beach - usi~g Boynton Beach Boulevard as an east/west
point of reference). Hence, a substantial portion of
unincorporated Palm Beach County (western boundary of trade area
is El Clair Ranch Road) is included in the trade area given the
subject s,ites are located on the western periphery of the
existing corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach.
While the City's Comprehensive Plan indicates an existing over-
allocation of commercial land use, the trade area associated
with the subject projects does not conincide with the corporate
limits of Boynton Beach in total. To make a determination that
"
.
.
. .,n. "<l"',H'~lKfU~n 'I'
..c; ~ ~~~~1l'G ,g~.~
'~t Mo~~~0 a- .~~
t~ n. .U....o..41 30."' ro
_...... ~":1li1 ~~ ~ ,-?~ c ..,
.~ .;J~8~~.l\ ;j..91l !<
.."~' >. "'.~=e a~"~ w
;'! 0 tJ e........!!- utl.9 "'"'
~ "'"':f l::: rI4 1-0 !l'~ ""
..,~ 1-.~""'o. ..u"r;., a.
:; E"'.....;.lN ~~.../' 0
C ~:"i ';1o.e:':':;~ E~5:l1- ~
, ~ ~ ,9 ~_ ~ - ~- 8" ~
10."" d II::; 0 D~ SU; 0.&1 W
~!i~ e1~~E~~ rS~~ ~
~ t g~~ ~a.i "t.1 g~~ ~:~
~g 1~~; ~t3 ~;:!1oe
~ to o.;:rJ-9 It OM'fi Ei
~ i.o,", 1'" <'0 ~ e
n,';"J J"i.u... t:l .,o"'d'"
IIQ
a
~
OJ
~
=
o
t
~
~
.~
"0
rIJ.
~
Q.)
"0
~
~
'"
~ ~.~ ~ i~ e~ ~.ng:_ ~:i
~ 2l..~ i t:l 0 e? ~ -z ~
~ ~ t:l ,2 ~ ~ t ~ = ~ ~-a
o>-y,~ .;>-c~ ~a1! a,
Ur:; t:-~ ~ ~ ::... "lI oS CI
....'>:"1"'0 Yl 1311 cc ;1'
O....utl :s~~~ "'a
...~!S> .!1.Jo.Vi ~~ M~
..:;J n :;J Q'" bCl" 1-0
3u!J[: ~e"g-;; 'c~-d~~
I;:; c ~...", ~ .- 0 "
~~c:;.... ug.~ !it~'!i.g
t: c ,,'" ~..-' <'II 1:1 "' v-:i D
....Mn C1"..r::"CI-d U.Q~'-
.~:: 0. v 0 ~ ",9-1l . ~ il.
_",13" 8"da ~ .101"0::1
5ir.;".g tJ'i~"'S~"r!;:u
';;>"'...l-9> ",13-;90 .
_::J~C" e -~8 f"tt-~
~~".!!>e~o.~'~l! ~~~
:t:' Loy eo.... t; ~::I tl 13:'--'
'J"g~Qg;~"'~""': g...u-g
"It ~... '0'5 a ~ Qi$, :;(
,
'I'
"
l\ ijH
~ ~ ~6
.~ .~ S"'='
~ a~~
.. -aeB
~ ~%
~ ., ~ ~
" ~o._
.1i ~~ ~ .
~~ ~:;.~ ~
;;. t\ 7. g~
Po ~." - O.
f-' 0"3; ~
bit ~ ~ .,.c
.9: ~~~3
lJl!iIln ~... u
~.g .8 e:!
','
,.,
"
01 ~ '"
c:'E~"t1
~- III ~
tIl =,"d'C
o."d ~ 0
e.:: ~r:;: 4i
.::!."d '0''- .:t:
I.J c:: ... O'a.
~ c1 c.~ 1::
on'"; ~ !U :;
~.~ d ~ ~
_ """.:::V1
cuOJ_C:
.c e :SO.S
1-60""
o ~OJ
u ~
,j
,
'"........
f '
~.' ./
.\,-"
"
I'
.'
,.,
"
'I'
e,s-9 ~ g g1!-ii ~*C .;;
~. a~a,. "'3 ~
B:~~9 o:a.x'~ :S-"'" -.;
-a ... "-0 ... ~ g >- '"
~-:;ii1g ~"'n'S :.S..: ~
O1i"~ og~"i H~g ;
4i t.::; ct tl a:.....> e &I......
.~.r1 &l;;), .r:l .,g ....S .... E " d ~
0_'> .. i ~i U '" g: I" -5 "
g -g :.0.. ~ ~ 9 '" ;, ~~ no
'Jp'nt.~~~ _~ii~i
'" <1 au ~ ;l 0:; g <.J t ~
-g'C,9~ E ij-gr;.o Q1 ~~~
l;! ~-s 8. ~:-.;!'E~ ~1;_!l" II
[,. ,a' .. t ~ ." &._ -5 "
ap"o~38.!; ._ac'"
'0'''\1 rJ.~aQ;;a<1~...,~~~~
.... ..c:.. ~"'B~w""g -~
~ a 1'11"''' 28';" t.2'
!t 8~ a ~ !;';; III: g. :::1:1
,.
tr\
,~
C.a
rJj
~g1i'" :>!{;',g9 ,g S
c" &. l.1~llog""O
g.9 it-iu IS ",:;':J ~ ~
~~ i~ H~~'i~.?
:~ ....':; 0>.8."1
mE .at, Bt'; ".
e~?:.8~~<1~li
-;; ~ t; ~ 1!..8 tt'p 8'e
0.. 8 ~.. 2-D -9~'" (;h.B 0.
::~-!li~li~~~i~
a~8~'EBHHl
:;~"'I!fl.IP"r!l"'o't'~
.~ 9 ti ~ vi]'-;;~.!!"'"
~~';;9a"'aHt~~
~Ellt' ",~~e
"'
o
~I
~1
"
G;
..:: VI
~aJa
0':':-
J-l._ ~
\'! OJ) P-
\j VI 1'1 "l;l
O(?-~~~
Go c1 C U
o V"/ ~
It t:: '0 <U
0........
P-VIVI
OJOJ::l
p::~6
;:I:
I-'
~
o
p<:
'-'
t:
7.
;.:>
o
u
fT
""
~
;~r
J
ge b~~~:.Lt;-~.dl. illS
0. _...~: t:"~r-".:3 g
o.t -8-!].o~<1<to"!!~"" .:....{3'
c'>'''' "'. ".~ot..Q ~!!
. eOf.1' -ag"t::bDE '""e
~ o.~-~ ov-S ",.-.,~ to.'>/)
S. _-::l,.~ot.I- J:lr~ c
o 0 ,..,D.l:.r:: u.~,J ......> ou-'
1 ~'gau; ~~~ ~~ ~ :.~
&l l:t:. :9~'~41ue.- --;:'"
'0 c ~'., ~ 0) u {1 0 E ~ ~ 6
~ e'e~'...iEo~3e "'~
o g~gg8t:::a~~ .~u
o 00 U . . t:l "''''U VI G.I'"
';:1 ~ u..... '" 0 0 ;>-.0l.I ,.., "'... 0
.~.s)j ~~ ~.;~ &.~!. ~z~:~
0.")'" '" ldn's ~"':;) ",1 ::1
gJt e~~~ ~E~8e .g
0"'==
.....O~ '!:
V'l'-.J::. N e
~ III ~ C' t: ~
~ g ;; c:: ::l c:.
t::._ ~ ::l.0 e
. ~ 00 0 '\.J '\J
Cu_U'N-
CO':'1lol ;::
g-:"E-5 ::::r:
'..I'"t:l 11 ... cc_
~.~ E ~ I'"~
.c:'" .. rl
I-eeo :r:
~ p,.8 u
~tlilt~ ~i:tr: C: ..!.o~'(;-e
o.~~~ it~e-=~~F.8
E.- 11 1] -0': tI~'" .; U
.... u... B "'_.....0... C ;"<1 '"
..._ VI'" "'...
;g":1 D.~ ~q(o 2. >.c ~~.;
~C,,:! n ........:;o~..,O
",ge"''gu .~""eSc.,::~~,,,,c'
;; VI -il1-o.4"'g E .,:-.:cG .... >.
If> ~.'"3 c1:.e - E n~:=: ""o~.o
~~~~~...~eo~-x o~~
u::I !f"'.::!"gc"...Od!t;c\f....
::; e-;;" "..... :A'- e~>:ii- '" '" 0 &.
_ _o.&:.o.c:: U<1<:1&1D"U
? u b ~....".... o.~ '" .J:'" ""..
: .s ~_11~':r~ ~.~r;i: a ~.a" II
dl.~ct~~~~5~!~"'5~
,.., _._.........c::.,,""'~~tD"C..,o
",. '" o. 8::1 .. ~~ ::I.'
,,~2B 11~~ ~C' >.~~MI
.g '::;:.2,~... I': !S... t 1! ....!:I.B
---
~
Vl
o
~
~
r.
t-'
z
~
-
....
c:>-
o
,....l
~
~
o
S~~oh
~u~~~
....~clmg:d
f'\'I dl C. C \I.' iJ
=~) ~;'i"': I1J !!!~
v 5 c ~.. ~ c ~
~u<tlQjfl:l-
<tl o'ii1 w d1 ~
S ~J :: E~ :
(;; QJ W 2J: <I.'
<11 dl Eo : '3
f. E'" C tJl
~ >. u 0 .gli.
"l~uN~.
.c.: _ >-:l C
:--.00 Q.O
~L:...~ofn
c:~~~n~
~ ') is t: g' >-
,U 1:. u - 1l
~Gtt1~~~
Q*c~t;,;o :
O(J)~u f':IE .<
~-
!.~
-.-;
'"i
~
!'\0 h ~
I, u ~O-w
~,.
.
.,
N
N
.'
;~ g:o ~~ g~ or.;:D';O;!'!; '?-~~ 'Jg .~~ "'~~;D
1""" I." to,''"! '~o.'-" f,!'" ....</, ~...~ :f.CJ! '<t.'''.
..._M_ r - ('JP" p....,-
8~
'I)g
,..:".
.
1
~
,
.
"
"
.
:i
. I.
.
. ~
~ '.
.~
,
.
,
,
"
,
"
.
~
"
m
e,
..,
:r. ~~ <:0:6 ~:D ~o ~~~ ~d~?; '!'~ mr.: ~~ 01"1'
,,,'f' ;R ~...~.~:f.1lI.......1......~..!'1 ""l!"'~
._ ... 1"' . -" .- -.....-
0'-
'!f;;
.~i'"
"
:2
;; ~:i} f;;t ro;:,:g:-J :ri;~.:n:! ~>7, ~~:h~ ~~ ~g
.".., ." '.....1(1"1." ..... .-M''''''''''''''' ....t_ 01'"
.....:t-.i . .
ON
~:.G
:;..ci
H : ~E ~~ h~;; h h h~E h ~E~;; "
Ell'! ;,oj 1:.:,.; t;'; 1::;.; "'-..: E,,; G;,; tE.;;; Eo;; Eo,; Eiii "0;: l:!~;;j
E 01.> ;1 E:' E:l E:l t:;;; E:J f.:) E:) E;) E:l E.J e iii ,..".:.
'J ~ Qj 1i f) g 'J g fJ g E :l 'J g 'J ~ ., g 0 ~ ? ~ " ~ E ::I C l :.;;
~.~:E~~w~=<~a;Js~:(~~~:(~m~:(:;a;t'3~ B~iJ
_~O'--' N.....NNI"JM.........,mIl11l11l110WWW........UUE-
Uf'<<lO~
]I
El
f'ftf'(UOfI"""""1l7.J
I..
Kilday It Aseodete8
Landscape Architects/ Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 6BS-5522 . Fax: (407) 689-2592
DEe 7 P"
PLANNING D~ 'T.
I
?IT'( C'F l3>-'rJp.J ~.-r-/.
P,--M,.J..JL=j Lx=F'T-
ATT fv1p:. L..J../,2/ 'S.
WE TRANSMIT
c:: L-' 7 f2-c.'
DATE /~-b-c-;r)
PROJECT NAME &~.;./,...,,../
PROJECT NUMBER 7'/<1. "5';
,
P<::..D. ;::,,I,_m-l ?c_D
.
7'7 e;. "'t
o HEREWITH
o UNDER SEPARATE COVER iliA
THE FOllOWING
o PRINTS 0 SPECIFICATIONS 0 ADDENDUM
DTRAc,NGS/SEP,AS 0 SUBMlfTALS 0 CHANGE ORDER
o SHOP DRAWINGS DcoPY OF lEITER ISZf ~...-~,,.-:z..TS.
THIS IS TRANSMITTED TO YOU.
ACTION CODE.
o FOR APPROVAL 0 FOR REVIEW & COMMENT
~OR YOUR USE ~AS REQUESTED
A REVIEWED
B NOT REVIEWED
C REVIEWED & NOTED
o RESUBMIT
E 00 NOT RESUBMIT
F RESUBMIT FOR FilES
NO OF
CQPIE:S
DATE
DRAWING
OR ITEM NO
DESCFUPTION/REl.tARKS
ACTION
CODE
I
:Z/I Ii??
? ;-1.2 /'vI /J ~ '-
L-A~<c:;,
~~',~,-,Jj,2~cJ~ ,4~ (~LJ'-~"5.7"?../~
LJS/~ F'E.:?L.4/~/\.-IC=r-7S
j:"-.c-~-,Jc.-'/V, __ ;.-<-E/VtC=H'/ 01=
L''''..->rI T I .c:oMP~:rI=JA"_k=-
?~I Bc-~-!
~
/
APD~"'./::::"-'M TO MAP/LEr A,J~-G$ 2:>'(
rnONP:So'r-l ~D""/;:SU,-;;J,-,? / ,../.e-. iI/(
lfoE7h?-5 ALXZ::>='~D~ho1 5..I....~1Z-Iz.GE~ ~'op/&Voof(O<"
e-"-=-",,e-NT .{ 41;11Y1 ;.J;L...'- -ST4Z>Y - :S'e'.::
P,A6<J~ 2..
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED. KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE
COPIES TO
WITH ENCLOSURE
o
o
o
o
o
FILE CODE
SHOP DRAWING DIV
I
SIGNED 6--1 ~.<-,L-- Y A JJ.=;T I'='
.
~
no addi~ional commercial land is needed at the subject sites
based on the methodology used to allocate commercial acreage
(which includes all commercial lumped together'such as office.
personal services, hotels/motels, nursing homes and ACLF's,
marine commercial and other ~iscellaneous uses in commercial
districts) in the City's Comprehensive Plan is much too generic
an approach. Site specific analysis is required to make such a
determination.
Given the commercial categories comprisi~g all commercial land
uses within the City of Boynton Beach a~e lumped together in the
Comprehensive Plan (particularly on the supply side - ACLF's,
nursing homes, marine commercial, etc.) and the fact that Boynton
Beach as well as Palm Beach County used supply and demand figures
based ,on acreage rather tha,~ on square feet in their
Comprehensive Plans, our response is based on g~oss acreages,
even though, as already pointed out, we believe this approach is
~oo generic and a site specifiC analysis for par~icular types of
commercial uses Oil a square footage basis is more appropriate.
In the Economic Element of Palm Beach County's Comprehensive
Plan, the trade area of the subject sites falls within both
Planning Areas 5A and 5B (subject sites in Planning Area 5B). In
both tHese Planning Areas, the Economic Element indicates that a
sllortfall in commercial acres exists. In Planning Area 58,
commercial land use needs are estimated at 1,153 acres in 1990,
while occupied co~mercial acres* are estimated at 1.042 a
supply shortfall of 111 acres., In Planning Area 5A (located to
the direct west of 5B - predominantly unincorporated Palm Beach
County), commercial land use needs are estimated at 310 acres in
1990, while occupied commercial acres* are estimated at 224 - a
supply shortfall of 85 acres+,
The approach taken by CH2M Hill (the County's Economic
Consui~ant) was to estimate the relationship between population
and commercial development using an input-output model, and after
making adjustments to reflect anticipated changes in demographics
and employment character, they estimated future demands for
commercial lands as a function of projected levels of population,
It is also important to point out that the analysis performed by
CH2M Hill recommended an addi~ional 5 year inventory above
current needs be permitted/designated in each Planning Area to
allow time for the development process to occur. Therefore, the
1995 recommended acreage figures of 1,303 acres in 53 and 502
acres in SA are indicated in terms of what should be allowed to
be designated and zoned for development during 1990. which
serves to increase the supply shortfall and supports the results
of our market analyses,
* Occupied commercial acres includes all developed, zoned or
designated commercial land,
:~
RECEIVED
,-
-' . '-;,-~~
EXHIBIT H
DEe 7 1990
P\.P.NNING DE.PT.
_Addendum to Market Analyses by Thompson ConSUlting,Inc.
Boynton Beach and Knuth Road P.C.D. 's
for
,EJ.c>y"..1::PJOS"''''s.b,....9.p..r:rlP..r::,'''b'2,,,..''',,i,y.'''.. F.'lar1n'9.P,n.,.?,:L<:i"'r..."'..1::,.2_'?"."..r::."'J,,,,..1::..,,,<:i....,t.ce
cgm.,r:rl,"',r..,c;"j..a..J,.....c!.."'m.a,n...cJ/",ypp,],y :
The subject requests conform with Policy 1,19.6 which indicates
that subsequent to Plan adCPtion the City shculd not allow
commercial acreage which is greater than the demand which has
be",n projected. >'.."..J.."ss it can be demonstrated that a geographic
need exists which cannot be fulfilled by existing commercially-
zoned property,
Within the trade area (refined from the 1-3 mile radius normally
associated with a neighborhood/community sized S~opping center,
factoring in physical barriers to access such as ~8ads/Ganals, as
well as shopping patterns and the location of existing
comoetitive/compa~able uses), all existing competitive/comparable
space as well as approved/in process space and zoned property was
accounted for in the supply side of the market analyses. Within
the same trade area, demand was derived based on estimated retail
space per capita figures and the estimated pop~lation in the
trade area. The retail space per' capita figures were developed
using retail sales data cornoi led for Pal," Beach County by the
State 'of Florida (by retai 1 use classifications) supplemented
with comparable data from Sales and Marketing Management's Survey
of 8~ying Power, and sales per square foot for the same retail
use classifications from the Urban Land Institute. A comparison
of Gstimated demand versus supply within the trade area
(geographic area) clearly indicated that the proposed centers
could be supported in base year 1990.
Estimated Demard = 3,933.598 square feet~
Estimated Supply = 3.378,430 square feet~
Estimated Supply Shortfall = 555.168 square feet~
In addition, with projected population increases in the trade
area ~:J 92,801 by 1995, an estimated 4.580,758 square feet could
be SL:~ported in the trade area which extends more than 2.0 miles
west of the Knuth Road (western corporate limits of the City of
Boynt~I' Beach - usi~g Boynton Beach Boulevard as an east/west
poin~ of reference). Hence, a substantial portion of
uninc2rporated Palm Beach County (wester~n boundary sf trade area
is E~ Clair Ranch Road) is included in the trade 2!'"'ea given the
subje2t sites are located on the wester~ periphery of the
exist~~g corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach.
While the CityTs Comprehensive Plan indicates an existing over-
alloc'2~ion of commercial land use, the trade area associated
witf, ~he subject projects does not conincide with the corporate
limits of Boynton Beach in total. To make a determination that
, '. ''''~''H~lKPJilr\.'
~ ~ :l~;b'e g~...
... G5""....~.. c.'.
'~i .,oo~'~" B .~~
_"~ ~ -,~,e;ll ,l!.~~~ ~
.... ii. ""Ie~~ '0"':'9.8 ...
.~ t; ~clI.a.~e lD"~ i5
:0 ~e:1';ej; U2.~'1 :I
:!! ~ li1-;..~::'I"'a.. t2 ~ ~ II ~
:f- o......e i,rt CI U c:l/t -l
Q o. "...-... c~"i-' UI
ptgOgn._~=o.""a' ;.>
...... a .,_~c a.!! .s.& o.t1 tal
",":I > Y't~~ ,,-otJ 0
Q ~t ;::::I,;r;~a tg~~ TIt
9;~ ,,=..;~:I'" "'Oil":': ~:~
g 1~o;;'3 ~~~~
i ~ to ~~:: oSl tor: 1 ~
n.~ ~UI" CI .a "0'"
~
;
~
aJ
~
~
/0
~
~
~
~
-P"'Il
"0
rIJ
~
OJ
~
cd
~
"'
".
"
'.
"
"
~~.---""
{
-\1'"
..
"
.,'
"
,"
,.
....
r~
. Q
.~
\I).
~t'*9 ~~eG 1-; ~'i
tX'g~ ~U~eti': i~
e e 0 ~:It... l:; ~"%.
~ ~.{e :; >- c t ::; 5~-
.~-at:-~ ~~t:... ~fj-9Cl
...., ='~ Yl O!1 n c ::1--.3
OCUli :s-~a~ ....... "0
...'V~> .3...0.... ~, ..~
L;J ii ;J a'" ."e..,'"
gu~~ j:!eS;; c'(;-d~~
~ ~ ..... ::'lO'll 5 ... e '; g-s
c"g t; ~ ::;..sa ~;J .g ft " ~ c
...!! ,".D C1'" ~ 'C -d U ~ E'-
_ .._ 0 t ,,9- .. c-
;...;:; 0" 8"0 I! ~..o...t. 10 8
~t;"ii-S ul~-g~"CI~~fl""
'")>"'Cl...J~~ "0"3g0 .
_;J~a" e'-~8 C'.e-~
~i"'.!!e)o~o.~'''..t' -e.~~
:r: _ '" Po. E1.O....::I tI 0'"
.-,."~~o.~..~,,..r'o...u-g
::i!t~~ 'O-sE~ ~~ ~
-;I..",
.- 0"(1
.~ t: '- ~
1I1 ~~'C
o."d - Q
E.:: ~CL: Gi
.a"'O '0''- ~
.... c'" o'c;.
~ C":I c.~ C
on"'; ~ ~ ~
~';:i t"S ~......
-w..c V1
lUQ,I....c
.c e ~.~
f-E..""
o 0Il~
<J
E ~H
" ~;6
.9 '_ S"CI
~ a~~
~ =' g
C ~ 5~
...c c.. c ?
, . 'II
t:i -5a....
.~ !i~ ~
1;J ';;,r.;~::i
.. -'" c
~. ~ 7. g.:!
: ~"d" 0.
f-' o~; tIO
WI tt ~ \I.t
c. ...... d::ll
v'..~ C~;j
~.9 ~ n.:!
~.~~ ~ ggg~ ~~~ ]
4~:.~-:;;9 e~~'~ :9,\.... c
""O..n... ~ 0 "
;;~ ii g !3" D'S ~"'"Q,
CDi~. '08-;;"2 ~,b$ ..
.;t,~~ t~';:je i~e ~
'6..~~~ ,{}~50." I~~d;
~~ ::c.j~ 1; g ~ :.v~~
",g~~'nt:;~i ~~~d
V".,En.u"3~ -;;ut"O'"
~.ag"?:ai1--, ~ ;J"...c!I
tC .D;:;scft-'" a.g~~.g
l;!~'9i"':"'~~~ ~'O!I~'"
t..g' ~.~t"~ &.~oc~
-~~.ll' ,.e",~.o~o-
o""'..E~;e.~,-i>' 9
~ ~ a ~",,::; e ~ 6'" t' t: 1l,:,
!te~e~ 'r;.;;-;g.' ~;.-::~.
'"
o
~I
~1
,,-
lD
5'g~~ ?!~,~g .g~
......K. "'a1l:08'!l',",
e,9"'r:-~'-'c..o".,...t
U"E9i~~~M.!1-
'5 ~ c 8 p 3 ~s ~ &..e~
:~~....Iai~..o~8."i
co t:. ~.D1!: 11"'-.1" tillS...
e~~t.e~~"'ie~
_lil:~e..e~~pee
:. 8 ~ .. e.D -li'O'" 1iJI.9 a.
~ .~ 'll t;oU.ll.E
.:.~~il~~Sa'(;~'"
t,lli8~-E y ;!li'
;;~ :~"1;'h~ 0 t'll.
eg" "i!]--.ll.!1-
,_ u ~ ..~ ~
..... """5 ".~
,:}11..,9 ..,~~ glif!".
~ 5.8 t' :i:"~ 6
~ '"
~aJa
O~-
~._ c..
!' OIl P.
~ '" ~~
.. ~.~ ~
IL e1 C U
3 l/'J ~
It t: '0 ~
o ...
D.l t; tI1
OJ OJ :l
p::~8
::r:
r-
~
o
~
(.;l
f
7.
:.;>
o
u
<fJ
Cl
I-Ll
I-Ll
7.
l-
i':
I-Ll
-
.?,
0.-
o
,..J
~
I-Ll
Cl
g~ b::::~:::: !I"".....;.:. ;'9
a. ~~.o~~~~;ii~ ~:s
':t s:i&l:i!,,"cvlle:a ~lJ
Ii e of.3' o.c:I" c bIIlt e
~. n.~=:?1 ~~-9 ~';':~ ~''>II
o S .,:!oo:c ~ll oJ....~: '"' \j.....
1 {l~~u~~~~'~g ~'2
... t S! ~ ~.:; " v e .'1 ;J. E
"d C E" Ie" c...I1 0 E:J ."
~ ~, 0 ~. 01' 5 ; -'v e e .. Eo
d U ~ r. .' E"
C 6~6E~";"'~'I:IO ."'<.1
,g~v-~g'o~'~ :;ur.~~
.~M"~{3~"~E~lt::-~"~
::I_~O .::1;:10. "'d~.1=...
0.": .;; ~ utilE. >-V'l:j r a
R.l ~~~~ ~E~8e.g
s~"'; .~
1Il......c::. ~ E
~ III '; i:.. t Q
1II g & C ::I c:
c,::: ... ::l.0 e
,.~ oil 8.Y.....
"':..0- N-
CC'~loI :-::
g-:'E-5 =::L
'.I~ '\I'" (0_
~':: e ~ I ~i
f-e:eo :c
: 0.8 U
cr
C()
~
~r
J
't18tJ ~~. C: ~-::e.c,
t~i;.e et!e-=lit:p.~
f... 0 '] '1:1",,"'" . U
,yv..e "'_-SAt:.C::I..X..
.._ .." r-.....
:g~o.-:::I ~oo!!>'c::3~";
;:Ic:v:l ""'......:;0..::..,;
-.ill e"!J.. .~ etl S c,,:: :ii:;:.";"
;;... ~... ","d e "-:::a: ....>,
... :,.,'" C >.::1 5 e .. E:;;: .. - '-.D
.....c...t::l::>8...O' ~o';.I:
;:Ic.....~.."O. u~o ...o_.J
<);:1 ."_;:IC"'" "'c....
... 0-;;> ,,~. ....- e"'> ~ ".. 0 &.
;; '.J c~.o::. 9;-e c.-S ....'? "t~...
. .. :,.. -"=. ~"
: -5 1It:l'tJ VI... ,~-'C' '2 v 9:-...
~ ::II,_"C 0 ~~o~E~S
:; ,{~ c: t~~ g.~ 5 ";:~..; 0
v~_.-.~~~te"~~~ ~;_.
...0(~.3 c:I tiJ:.. "CI c.7i >.:lI'ljZ '"
.g .:;;.2,.... "g.,$ t t! e.s.!:i
~
N
,.
",
;~g:O;:~tf~or.;;;,'f':!~?:~~iJ~~"'~:.; 8'"
<"If-. 1_" ~.~,~~'... f'!."1.......~...~ ~d'......~ .uR
..._,.,_ ... _ NP'" p.....- ,..:'"
1
~
,
w
"
S~~oh
~u~~~
_~i3~~xi
I!~ <; t.....: b
_~U~l.1U ::
U u 1..: ,., ~ c: ~
~ u.~ 'ii ltl;1
<'llo..,VG,l....
E' u t:;,; '"
~~lv2L~
'lI G.l Eo ::J
f. L: t.: tJt
Go' > \,;.;; 0..
... ",'0 ~lL
: [.:'(~-5 c
c..:. ;-,') 0 0.12
_ i::'" C 0 tJl
CJCll1o.~
<'ll'J ::J 1.: 0'1
~Ul~~ll
VI r: 'lI \) ~ V'I
c; u "ii 0 d'
f) ~ C a; tiliV :
Oro~ultlE .(:
0.... 1
~;:; ~
.ri_ a
: :-.
~
M"" ~ 'It
~:G
:,:'D !
'"
",
...
:r.~;1, ~~ci ~:D:::\g ~;.~ 'E of ~'r. '!';;.:~ o.i; 0:
(oj'('o .., ""'1,.)01 o,n.. ",$\ .',''' ~'l c~ "'''! P,~
.:..;..i -" - -....-
o
"'
_ ",'" 0'0"',...... ,,'N ",'f '_'f 0'" M,.....,N MV) 1D
,., .0'0 (,),,, <OUJ lIl'lllll'O),'''''' <11'" CO... .,,'1) MtO ",M
.' <"' ,oj ''1'''Ot'''''' ..M......" .....-- ...,.17'0'0
~...; N . .
~-
!I
~l
;;..,; ;;j;a;;, ti ii .. ~ ;; .... ,.
~~ ~~~~~~~~..~~~~~~~~~~e~~;i~~ ~
E... .. ~ .. \:; .. \:; .. 'V' E" 1:;" t: - E. .. E .. e - co - v U '~,
Ell> rgE!:('3E;;1:~E3r!;E'3E!)E'SE'Se~;to~
'J ~ _ U ., U " U .,0 E .3 ., U ",-, 'J V 0 \J '} V fJ 0 E :;I ~"l _w ~..
UQ~~U5U~US~U()~USUsusususn~~(~
:!&:g~ ~~ ~~ ~re ~~ ~~ ~~:!.~~:R ~~ ~m:::;:: t33~
;
i
~
<
~
....
..
! 1 ~~ I ~
I ' 0 I" ~
'.<n-w
.! ~-
..
:ll
El
""""'~
?2"'"~
":-'".~ .~.-
- '~', l!1-'~ =;=.
0.3 ~ ..v 2:_1.
. ~ m '..~ \_.:1
c ~ -
, . .
. Il
"'
.
~
~
2
~
-@-
...,,.,\001I.........,1&:)
.. .
,
-'
____..___._._,~_ _---'.l..
.,
Knd.y ft AlIlIOCi_
Landscape Architects/Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach. Florida 33401
De~lllIlleP522 ~ F8lelJ07l 689-2592
Mr. Christopher Cutro
Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Fl 33425
Re: Knuth Road P.C.D. - Ref. #799.5
Boynton Beach P.C.D. - Ref. #799.9
Tara Oaks P.D.D. - Ref #799.10
Dear Mr. Cutro,
Pursuant to our meeting on 11/30/90,
following for your review:
we have enclosed the
-Letter from Mr. K. S. Rogers, Traffic Consultant for the
applicant. detailing confirmed road improvements that
positively affect the traffic analysis for Knuth~oad P.C.D
and Boynton Beach Blvd. P.C.D.
-Proposal from CZR, Inc., Environmental Consultants, for
possible Gopher Tortoise relocation on the Tara Oaks site.
This proposal was requested over a month ago in anticipation
of the need to relocate most of the Gopher Tortoise on site
due to habitat overpop\llation.
While we feel that the Tara Oaks site has be on disturbed to the
point that it is not a viable native habitat, we are committed to
preserving habitat if the City so desires. We have contacted Tom
Fucigna with CZR and requested that they amend tha above noted
proposal to include an environmental assessment of the site. We
expect to work with CZR in preparing support documentation for
our response report to D.C.A,
The above information shoulu help alleviate any concerns you may
have regarding approvalS for the above noted projects. If you
have any questions or need additional information, please don't
hesitate to call.
RECEIVED
Sincerely,
at:;# / //:/
.~ //e://~--'--_u-
4.~/ /
Chuck Yannette
0iC .. lWJ
PLANNING DEPT.
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(407) 964-7300
(FAX) 969-9717
December 3, 1990
Mr. Christopher Cutro
Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
120 N.E. 2nd Avenue
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE: Knuth Road PCD
Boynton Beach Blvd. PCD
Reply to DCA Response
Dear Cutro:
We have been asked to prepare a reply to the comments prepared ~
the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) concerning the compati-,
bility of the traffic impacts from these proposed commercial '
developments and the City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan.
Since the preparation of the Traffic Impact Analysis for the two
projects, a number of traffic related developments have tran-
spired which impact these projects. These traffic developments
are:
1. Palm Beach County has awarded the contract for and
construction has commenced on the four laning of Woolbright Road
(S.W. 15th Avenue) between Congress Avenue and Military Trail.
Computer estimates prepared by Palm Beach County show that there
is expected to be a 10,000 trip per day decrease in traffic on
Boynton Beach Boulevard between Military Trail and Congress
Avenue and a 3,000 trip per day decrease in traffic on Boynton
Beach Boulevard between Congress and 1-95.
2. Palm Beach County has awarded the contract for and
construction has commenced for the expansion from four to six
lanes of Congress Avenue from Boynton Beach Boulevard north of
Miner Road.
3. Palm Beach County has awarded the contract for and
construction has commenced for the expansion from two to six
lanes for Military Trail from Boynton Beach Boulevard north to
Hypoluxo Road.
Mr. Christopher Cutro,
Planning Director, City of Boynton Beach
December 3, 1990
Knuth Road PCD
Boynton Beach Blvd. PCD
Page Two
4. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has
committed to the widening of Boynton Beach Boulevard from two to
four lanes from the Florida Turnpike to El Clair Ranch Road and
from two to six lanes from El Clair Ranch Road to Military Trail.
This construction is scheduled to commence during the first
quarter of 1991.
5. FDOT has scheduled the construction of the interchange
on 1-95 with N. W. 22nd Avenue during the current fiscal year.
This interchange is expected to initially divert a minimum of
8,000 trips per day off of Boynton Beach Boulevard between Con-
gress Avenue and 1-95 and off of Congress Avenue between Boynton
Beach Boulevard and N.W. 22nd Avenue.
6. Palm Beach County has scheduled improvements to the link
of Boynton Beach Boulevard between Old Boynton Road and 1-95
which will expand that link to a six lane road. This work will
be completed during the current year.
The completion of this considerable list of roadway projects will
provide a substantial amount of additional roadway capacity in
the area around these two projects. These improvements will also
allow for the redistribution of traffic away from Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Congress Avenue and onto Woolbright Road (S.W. 15th
Avenue) and onto N.W. 22nd Avenue. With this additional roadway
capacity and the redistribution of traffic which is expected, it
is concluded that there is adequate roadway capacity available
for these two projects and that the City's goals and objectives
for providing adequate capacity have been met.
Very truly yours,
K.S.
Fla.
S, P.E.
No. 20468
KSR/jr
(cr:commtp2.krd:Dec90#1)
,
, if
'1
.
Kild8Y & A880ci8teS
Landscape ArchitectslPlanners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 . Fax: (407) 689-2592
.............
.
November 12, 1990
NOV ]" 106;
PLANNINQ ()it!':,
Hr. Christopher Cutro, AICP
Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Re: Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD, Knuth Road PCD & Tara
Oaks PUD
Dear Hr. Cutro,
Thank you for the opportunity of allowing me to respond
to the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report
(ORC) prepared by the Florida Department of Community
Affairs staff for the above referenced projects. At
the time the three (3) projects were approved, I was
concerned that some of the City staff's comments in
their memoranda regarding Comprehensive Plan
consistency would result in further negative responses
from the Department of Community Affairs. For that
reason, I prepared and submitted to the City Council an
"Applicant's Response" for each of the three projects
for discussion at the time of the Public Hearing. These
documents examined many of the consistency issues
raised in the City staff's report and attempted to
clarify that the proposals were in fact consistent with
the Plan. I have attached these reports herein for your
review as you were not present at the time of the
Public Hearings.
However, in organizing my responses to better address
the DCA comments, ] have prepared a new report which
includes some of the previous information as well as
new information for issues not previously identified.
After reading the DCA report I must say that most, if
not all, of the concerns expressed therein can be
resolved by providing the staff reviewer with
additional information. (For instance, the increased
intensity in Tara Oaks allowed for the clustering of
units on the north side of the property.) I have
therefore structured my response in terms of the
specific Chapter 9J-5 Rule referenced as well as any
Boynton Beach Goals and Objectives discussed in the
Mr. Christopher Cutro
November 13, 1990
Page Two
report and any other Goals and Objectives of relevance
which I believe support the requested amendments.
Finally, I have provided additional historical, site
specific, and/or detailed information which normally is
not considered in generalized land use designations but
has relevance in terms of meeting the Goals and
Objectives of the Plan.
I will be glad to meet with you to review this response
in even greater detail. Please let me know if I can be
of any further help. Thank you.
Sincerely, i: ~
.~, t?
~ ~ ry-Q-fe!:'~/'-I
th'eran J. K Iday U
Kilday & AlIlIOCletu
Landscape Architects/ Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach. Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 . Fax: (407) 689-2592
KNUTH ROAD P.C.D.
APPLICANTS RESPONSE
A. Whether the proposed rezoning would be ccnsistent with
applicable Comprehensive Plan policies. The Planning
Department shall also recommend limitations cr requirements
which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of
the property, in order to comply with policies contained in
the Comprehensive Plan.
Simultaneous with the application for rezoniLg, the applicant
requested an amendment to the existing Land Cse designation
and text for Area 7.j. of the Future Land Use Element Support
Document. If these amendments are approved, the subsequent
rezoning will be consistent with the amended text.
Page 40 of the plan specifically allows additional commercial
designations "for minor boundary adjustments, small infill
parcels, or commercial uses of a highly specialized nature,
which have special locational or site requirements, and
therefore cannot be easily accommodated on already designated
commercial areas." The applicant contends ttat this site
meets these requirements.
1. The property already has a Commercial Desjgnation in Palm
Beach County. The County adopted Comprehenshe Plan
designated the north 450 feet High Intensive Commercial and
the remainder as commercial Recreation. There is an existing
approval allowing for the construction of a ~olf and tennis
center including driving range for this property. The City
plan also designates the North 250 feet for Local Retail
Commercial. The issue is only one of whether the Local Retail
commercial should be extended to include the entire site, a
"minor boundary adjustment."
2. Much of the commercial inventory referenced by staff is
located in other areas of the City where lack of demand
and/or dimensions make the future prospect of development
unlikely. Modern shopping facilities include larger anchor
stores than even several years ago. The eXl,sting
recommended depth of 250 feet cannot accommocate a modern
center and violates the City policy of "discouraging strip
commercial development." Much of the availab::e commercial
inventory is along U.S. 1 and is of insufficient depth to
accommodate these uses. Additionally, the nEW uses wish to
locate in an area where the population can slCpport the uses.
Knuth Road PCD
Applicant's Response
Page 2 of 4
Again ,much of the vacant commercial land is in the wrong
place. Lastly, the location of the mall in this area has
designated this geographic area as a prime commercial
location attracting users to where people are already going.
3. The intersection of Knuth Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard
is already designated for commercial development consistent
with the City policy of "encouraging commerci21 uses to be
located at intersections. Knuth Road has been designated to
be routed to provide a major entrance to the Boynton Beach
Mall to the North and the applicant has agreed to construct
Knuth Road to provide continuity to Woolbright Road to the
South. Woolbright Road is scheduled to be constructed by the
County in fiscal year 1990-1991.
3. The applicant feels that this property is also an infill
situation. All of the land surrounding it is elready
developed. The text for Area 7.j. specifically recommends
Local Retail commercial for a portion of the ~,i te. As the
property is a single entity the applicant is requesting that
only this one land use be applied to the site, The applicant
believes a properly designed planned Commercial Development
allows for appropriate infill and transition between this
intersection and the Quail Ridge golf Course teo the south and
west. Staff recognizes that the development should have no
adverse impact on Quail Ridge.
B. Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the
established land use pattern, or would create an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent or nearby districts, or would
constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
property owner as contrasted with the protection of the
public welfare.
As previously indicated the property to the north and east
the petition is currently being utilized for commercial
purposes. The existing commercial depth of the property to
the east is significantly deeper that the 250' suggested by
staff. The applicant is not requesting that a. new use be
applied to his site, only that the designated use of the
frontage be allowed sufficient depth to permi~ a modern
designed planned commercial Development. The ?lanned
Commercial Development is designed to mitigata any impact
with the residential property to the west, sc~th and east
through the use of landscape buffers and walls.
Furthermore, the applicant is required to signalize the
intersection thereby benefitting the residencas who now must
negotiate this dangerous intersection without a light.
Knuth Road PCD
Applicant's Response
Page 3 of 4
C. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed
rezoning desirable.
The proposed use has probably been the best use for the
property for some time. Because the property was already
designated Commercial in part the applicant assumed that t he
whole site could be utilized for commercial purposes at such
time that development was timely and proper. The application
for a Planned Commercial Development reflects the changing
times in shopping center developments where integrated plans
supercede old strip commercial development which would occur
if the site was built according to the existing plan.
The current designation was assigned by staff with no input
from the property owner.
D. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with
utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities.
The proposed use constitutes a significant decrease in the
amount water and sewer connections required Lnder the
Moderate and Local Retail designations. Mr. K.S. Rogers has
addressed the issues raised in Mr. Keller's letter. Because
this application was submitted to Boynton Beach prior to
February 1, 1990 it is not sUbject to the Municipal
Implimentation Ordinance. (See letter of Mr. Cannon.)
E. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with
the current and future use of adjacent and noarby properties,
or would affect the property values of adj accmt or nearby
properties.
The proposed use is entirely consistent with the existing and
future land uses to the north, and east. Tho applicant has
designed the Planned commercial Development::o minimize any
impact on adjacent neighbors. Staff has concluded that the
proposed use would have no negative effect on Quail Ridge due
to the existing buffers and separation of homes because of
the golf course design. The applicant has me~ with the
adjacent neighbors in Stonehaven several times, and offered a
separate agreement guaranteeing certain buffering conditions
between Stonehaven P.U.D. and the Applicant.
F. Whether the property is physically and economically
developable under the existing zoning.
The applicant contends that the property is ,~ot developable
under existing zoning for the following reasons:
Knuth Road PCD
Applicant's Response
Page 4 of 4
1. The existing depth of the Local Retail commercial
designation promotes strip commercial development which is
not in the interest of good planning or markGtable.
2. The small parcel of land remaining cannot be properly
developed into a residential community as it is too small for
developing a sense of community.
G. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a sc~le which is
reasonably related to the needs of the neighjorhood and the
City as a whole.
The applicant has submitted a market analysis indicating that
this project is supportable by existing and future
populations. The staff has accepted the findings of this
analysis. This use will have not effect on the Central
Business District as there are no properties in that area of
similar configuration which would allow a development of this
type.
H. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the City
for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already
allowed.
The applicant has reviewed the City inventory of commercial
lands and has determined there are no other sites of similar
size, shape, and location except for the companion petition,
Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD. The value of this site is
particularly enhanced by its location at the intersection of
Winchester Boulevard and Boynton Beach Boulevard which is a
major accessway to Boynton Beach Mall.
Kilday & AlI8OClat..
Landscape Architects/ Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(4071 689-5522 . Fax: (407) 689-2592
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD P.C.D.
APPLICANTS RESPONSE
A. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with
applicable Comprehensive Plan policies. The Planning
Department shall also recommend limitations or requirements
which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of
the property, in order to comply with policies contained in
the Comprehensive Plan.
Simultaneous with the application for rezoning, the applicant
requested an amendment to the existing Land Use designation
and text for Area 7.k. of the Future Land Use Element Support
Document. If these amendments are approved, the subsequent
rezoning will be consistent with the amended text.
Page 40 of the Plan specifically allows additional commercial
designations "for minor boundary adjustments, small infill
parcels, or commercial uses of a highly specialized nature,
which have special locational or site requirements, and
therefore cannot be easily accommodated on already designated
commercial areas." The applicant contends that this site
meets these requirements. Much of the commercial inventory
referenced by staff is located in other areas of the City
where lack of demand and/or dimensions make the future
prospect of development unlikely. Modern shopping facilities
include larger anchor stores than even several years ago.
Much of the available commercial inventory is along U.S. 1
and is of insufficient depth to accommodate these uses.
Additionally, the new uses wish to locate in an area where
the population can support the uses. Again much of the vacant
commercial land is in the wrong place. Lastly, the location
of the mall in this area has designated this geographic
area as a prime commercial location attracting users to
where people are already going.
The applicant feels that this property is alsc an infill
situation. All of the land surrounding it is already
developed. The text for Area 7.k. specifically recommends
C-4 zoning and the existing post office as legitimate
and desirable uses. These uses abut the site. The applicant
believes a properly designed Planned Commercial Development
allows for appropriate infill and transition between these
more intensive uses and the residential property to the west.
Boynton Beach Blvd. PCD
Applicant's Response
Page 2 of 4
Furthermore Policy 1.19.6 of the Plan states that commercial
designations can be allowed when "it can be demonstrated that
a particular property is unsuitable for other uses." The
parcel of property is located at the intersect:~on of
Winchester Boulevard and Boynton Beach Bouleva;'d directly
adjacent to the post office and County zoned Industrial
properties. The current designation of high density
multifamily fronting on Boynton Beach Boulevard is not in the
best interest of the city. Because of the intensity of the
location and adjacent uses, the chance of quaL,ty residential
development is slim. The Comprehensive Plan already
indicates that the City will have a surplus of 539 rental
apartments at buildout. This application eliminates 159 of
those units.
The Plan'also indicates that "the City should continue its
policy of encouraging commercial uses to be located at
intersections, and discouraging strip commercial
development." This application, located at the intersection
of Winchester Boulevard and Boynton Beach Boulevard, meets
this criteria. The intersection is already signalized and
the applicant has offered to allow access to t:le intersection
from the adjacent post office.
B. Whether the proposed rezoning would be con':rary to the
established land use pattern, or would create an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent or nearby distri,cts, or would
constitute a grant of special privilege to an:.ndividual
property owner as contrasted with the protection of the
public welfare.
As previously indicated, the property to the north, east, and
south of the petition is currently being utiliO'.ed for
Commercial or Institutional purposes. The Planned Commercial
Development is designed to mitigate any impact with the
residential property to the west and southwest. Furthermore,
the design allows access to the post office at a signalized
intersection (Boynton Beach Boulevard and Winchester
Boulevard) providing a benefit to the Boynton citizens in
both the incorporated and unincorporated area.
C. Whether changed or changing conditions mak., the proposed
rezoning desirable.
The proposed use has probably been the best use for the
property for some time. Because the property was owned by
absentee owners (University of Florida Trust)~he question of
its ultimate use has never previously been discussed in
detail. The current designation was assigned b.J staff with no
input from the property owner.
Boynton Beach Blvd. PCD
Applicant's Response
Page 3 of 4
D. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with
utility systems, roadways, and other pUblic facilities.
The proposed use constitutes a significant decrease in the
amount of water and sewer connections required under the High
Density designation. Mr. K.S. Rogers has addr,~ssed the issues
raised in Mr. Keller's letter. Because this application was
submitted to Boynton Beach prior to February:, 1990 it is
not subject to the Municipal Implimentation O:dinance. (See
letter of Mr. Cannon.)
E. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with
the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties,
or woulCl affect the property values of adjacelt or nearby
properties.
The proposed use is entirely consistent with the existing and
future land uses to the north, east, and SOUtl, as previously
stated. The applicant has designed the Plannej Commercial
Development to minimize any impact on adjacent neighbors. To
that end, the applicant has met with the adja:::ent neighbors
several times, and offered a separate agreemeat guaranteeing
certain buffering conditions between Stonehav3n PUD. and the
applicant.
F. Whether the property is physically and ec~nomically
developable under the existing zoning.
The applicant contends that the property is not developable
under existing zoning for the following reasons:
1. The location of the property at a major intersection
with surrounding intensive and industrial type uses
makes any residential use unfeasible.
2. The property has considerable muck deposits. All
building pads will have to be demucked at a
considerable expense. The total building coverage of
the Planned Commercial Development is much less and
more compact than a High Density residential
development. The applicant does not believe a
residential project can absorb the ccst of this
process.
G. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is
reasonably related to the needs of the neightorhood and the
City as a whole.
Boynton Beach Blvd. PCD
Applicant's Response
Page 4 of 4
The applicant has submitted a market analysis indicating that
this project is supportable by existing and flCture
populations. The staff has accepted the findings of this
analysis. This use will have no effect on the Central
Business District as there are no properties jn that area of
similar configuration which would allow a development of this
type.
H. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the City
for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already
allowed.
The applicant has reviewed the City inventory of commercial
lands and has determined there are no other SJ_tes of similar
size, sJ1ape, and location except for the compccnion petition,
Knuth Road, PCD. The value of this site is particularly
enhanced by its location at the intersection of Winchester
Boulevard and Boynton Beach Boulevard which is a major
accessway to Boynton Beach Mall.
Kilday & A8IIOClataa
Landscape Architects/Planners
155t Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
14071 689-5522 . Fax: (407) 689-2592
TARA OAKS PUD
APPLICANTS RESPONSE
A. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with
applicable Comprehensive Plan policies. The planning
Department shall also recommend limitations or requirements
which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of
the property, in order to comply with policies contained in
the Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant contends that the proposed char:ge in Land Use
Designation is consistent with the policies of the Plan. The
attached water and sewer consumption calculat,ions indicate
that the net result of the proposed changes cnticipated by
Tara Oaks PUD, Knuth Road PCD, and Boynton Beach Boulevard
PCD will result in a total decrease in the amount of water
and sewer required. Additionally, whereas the existing Plan
allows for a total of 314 units to be built, the combined
proposal results in a reduction of 122 units, This reduction
is consistent with the plans assumption that there will be a
surplus of 539 units at buildout.
B. Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the
established land use pattern, or would create an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent or nearby districts, or would
constitute a grant of special privilege to arc individual
property owner as contrasted with the proteci,ion of the
public welfare.
The proposed masterplan undertakes to provide compatibility
between the new project and adjacent land uses. All units
have been located north of Congress Avenue. ',:.'he type and
style and placement of the units is similar i:o the project
immediately to the east, Clipper Cove. The property to the
south of Congress Avenue adjacent to Lakes of Tara is
designated for open space and a church, both passive land
uses.
C. Whether changed or changing conditions mccke the proposed
rezoning desirable.
There is an existing zoning approval for thi:; property which
has never been built. The prime reasons for !lot building are
the shape of the property (very narrow due to right-of-way
for Knuth Road) and the cost of the construc~ion of Knuth
Road which is prohibitive but a responsibility of whomever
Tara Oaks PUD
Applicant's Response
Page 2 of 2
develops this property, The proposed density has been
ascertained utilizing':he cost of this construction and
working backward to de~ermine a reasonable impact on a per
unit basis.
D. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with
utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities.
As indicated by staff, this project meets all requirements of
all traffic performance standards, County and City. Water and
sewer consumption has ::Jeen discussed previously.
E. Whether the propos~d rezoning would be compatible with
the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties,
or would affect the property values of adjacent or nearby
properties.
As indicated by staff, the design of the master plan with
similar units abutting similar units on adjacent property
results in no negative effect on any surrounding areas.
F. Whether the proper~y is physically and economically
developable under the ,~xisting zoning.
As previously discussed, the current land use designation and
zoning approval is not economically developable due to the
cost of the constructi::m of Knuth Road.
G. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is
reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the
City as a whole.
The scale of the project is identical to the project on
adjacent land to the e~st.
H. Whether there are ~dequate sites elsewhere in the City
for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already
allowed.
The proposed use allows for the consolidation of residential
dwellings away from Boynton Beach Boulevard. The two
companion petitions currently allow for significant
residential development in areas which are not desirable.
The proposed plan allows for a reasonable use of this
property without any adverse impacts on surrounding
residences.
FACT SHEET
PROJECTED TAX REVENUES
The City of Bovnton Beach millage rate is 7.9132 (per $1,0001
A. Boynton Be3ch Boulevard PCD
13.371 acee site
ESTIMATED VALU~: $13,000,000 X 7.9132 = $102.871.00 TAXES
R. Knuth Road PCD
14.76 acr, site
ESTIMATED VALUE: $13.775,000 X 7.9132
$109,004.00 TAXES
-_._-_._--+._,.~-_.~_._--~ .~-----_._--
ESTIMATED EMPL.OYEES
Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD
Knuth Hoad PCL
290 Employees
320 Employees
Tota 1
f;10 Employee
Boynton Beach
Blvd. PCD
WATER USE
BEFORE AFTER
Units or Gallons units or Gallons
Square Feet Sauare Feet
78 units 41,400 192 Units lOl,800
Church
(650 seats) 446
77 Units 40,810
46,070 110,900
SF Retail 4,607 SF Retail 11,090
9,100 SF 9,lOO SF
Restaurant 21.750 Restaurant 2l 750
l59 Units 84,270
Tara Oaks PUDD
Knuth Road PCD
113,000
SF Retail
11,300
7,000 SF
Restaurant
l7.350
163,736
Sub-Total for Water Use
192,837
===========================~====================~======================
SEWER USE
BEFORE AFTER
Units or Gallons Units or Gallons
Sauare Feet Sauare Feet
Tara Oaks PUD 78 units 7,020 192 units l7,280
Church
(650 seats) 446
Knuth Road PCD 77 Units 6,930
46,070 110,900
S:,' Retail 4,607 SF Retail 11,090
9,100 SF 9,lOO SF
Restaurant 21. 750 Restaurant 21.750
Boynton Beach 159 Units l4,3l0
Blvd. PCD
113,000
SF Retail 11,300
7,000 SF
Restaurant 17 350
sub-Total for Sewer Use 54,617 79,216
GRAND TOTALS 247,454 242,952
Gallons Gallons
"""~li .'
thereafter so long as that person or entity shall have an
ownership interest in the property. Nei ther Winchester nor
Schroeder shall be under any personal obligation to make, or
cause to be made, the improvements and other arrangements
provided for in this Agreement with respect to the real
properties which are the subject of the Boynton Beach Boulevard
PCD, the Knuth Road PCD and the Tara Oaks PUD applications if the
provisions of this Agreement with respect to all of suoh
improvements and other arrangements are, by the filing of
appropriate instruments, made covenants of record running with
the land and binding upon the person or entity having fee simple
title to such real properties. The Association shall be entitled
to apply to a court of competent jurisdiction and to obtain
'affirlllative injunctive relief to enforCe specificallY the full
and timely perforlllance of the obligations set forth in this
Agreement concerning the making of such improvements and other
arrangements and to enforce any such covenants of record. Any
provision hereof to the contrary notwithstanding, neither
Winchester nor Schroeder shall have any personal or other
obligation to make, or cause to be made, the improvements or
arrangements provided for in this Agreement as to any of the
properties, which are the subject of the referenced applications,
unlesS the application pertaining to the property in question
receives all final requisite government approvals and final
ordinances are adopted by the city of Boynton Beach with respect
to same.
signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
STONEHAVEN HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC.,
a Florida corporation
By:
ROGER H. BENNETT
Its President
AS TO STONEHAVEN HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC.
BILL R. WINCHESTER
AS TO BILL R. WINCHESTER
MICHAEL A: SCHROEDER, TRUSTEE
AS TO MICHAEL A. SCHROEDER,
TRUSTEE
(Winchester\stonel.Agm\06/l9/90)
-7-
I
'fild
Land pe Architects/ Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
1407) 689-5522 . Fax: 1407) 689-2592
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD P.C.D.
APPLICANTS RESPONSE
A. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with
applicable Comprehensive Plan policies. The planning
Department shall also recommend limitations or requirements
which would have to be imposed on subsequent de>velopment of
the property, in order to comply with policies contained in
the Comprehensive Plan.
Simultaneous with the application for rezoning, the applicant
requested an amendment to the existing Land Use designation
and text for Area 7.k. of the Future Land Use Element support
Document. If these amendments are approved, the subsequent
rezoning will be consistent with the amended text.
Page 40 of the Plan specifically allows additional commercial
designations "for minor boundary adjustments, small infill
parcels, or commercial uses of a highly specialized nature,
which have special locational or site requirements, and
therefore cannot be easily accommodated on already designated
commercial areas." The applicant contends that this site
meets these requirements. Much of the commerci~l inventory
referenced by staff is located in other areas of the City
where lack of demand and/or dimensions make the future
prospect of development unlikely. Modern shopping facilities
include larger anchor stores than even several years ago.
Much of the available commercial inventory is along U.S. 1
and is of insufficient depth to accommodate these uses.
Additionally, the new uses wish to locate in an area where
the population can support the uses. Again much of the vacant
corunercial land is in the wrong place. Lastly, the location
of the mall in this area has designated this geographic
area as a prime commercial location attracting users to
where people are already going.
The applicant feels that this property is alsc an infill
situation. All of the land surrounding it is already
developed. The text for Area 7.k. specifically recommends
C-4 zoning and the existing post office as legitimate
and desirable uses. These uses abut the site. The applicant
believes a properly designed Planned Commercial Development
allows for appropriate infill and transition between these
more intensive uses and the residential property to the west.
Boynton Beach Blvd. PCD
Applicant's Response
Page 2 of 4
Furthermore policy 1.19.6 of the Plan states that commercial
designations can be allowed when "it can be demonstrated that
a particular property is unsuitable for other uses." The
parcel of property is located at the intersect::.on of
Winchester Boulevard and Boynton Beach BoulevaJ:d directly
adjacent to the post office and County zoned Industrial
prope'rties. The current designation of high density
multifamily fronting on Boynton Beach Boulevard is not in the
best interest of the city. Because of the intensity of the
location and adjacent uses, the chance of quaL,ty residential
development is slim. The Comprehensive Plan a:Lready
indicates that the City will have a surplus of 539 rental
apartments at buildout. This application eliminates 159 of
those units.
The Plan'also indicates that "the City should continue its
policy of encouraging commercial uses to be located at
intersections, and discouraging strip cOlnmercLll
development." This application, located at the intersection
of Winchester Boulevard and Boynton Beach Bou18vard, meets
this criteria. The intersection is already siqnalized and
the applicant has offered to allow access to t:le intersection
from the adjacent post office.
B. Whether the proposed rezoning would be con':rary to the
established land use pattern, or would create an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent or nearby distr.cts, or would
constitute a grant of special privilege to an ,.ndividual
property owner as contrasted with the protection of the
public welfare.
As previously indicated, the property to the north, east, and
south of the petition is currently being utili::ed for
commercial or Institutional purposes. The Planned Commercial
Development is designed to mitigate any impact with the
residential property to the west and southwest. Furthermore,
the design allows access to the post office at a signalized
intersection (Boynton Beach Boulevard and Winc:lester
Boulevard) providing a benefit to the Boynton citizens in
both the incorporated and unincorporated area.
C. Whether changed or changing conditions mak" the proposed
rezoning desirable.
The proposed use has probably been the best US8 for the
property for some time. Because the property was owned by
absentee owners (University of Florida Trust) '~he question of
its ultimate use has never previously been discussed in
detail. The current designation was assigned b'T staff with no
input from the property owner.
Boynton Beach Blvd. PCD
Applicant's Response
Page 3 of 4
D. Whether the proposed rezoning would be cornpatible with
utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities.
The proposed use constitutes a significant decrease in the
amount of water and sewer connections requirer[ under the High
Density designation. Mr. K.S. Rogers has addr",ssed the issues
raised in Mr. Keller's letter. Because this application was
submitted to Boynton Beach prior to February "l, 1990 it is
not subject to the Municipal Implimentation Q,:dinance. (See
letter of Mr. Cannon.)
E. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with
the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties,
or woula affect the property values of adjacelt or nearby
properties.
The proposed use is entirely consistent with che existing and
future land uses to the north, east, and sout1, as previously
stated. The appl~cant has designed the plannei Commercial
Development to minimize any impact on adjacen~ neighbors. To
that end, the applicant has met with the adja:::ent neighbors
several times, and offered a separate agreeme1t guaranteeing
certain buffering conditions between Stonehav~n PUD. and the
applicant.
F. Whether the property is physically and ec~nomically
developable under the existing zoning.
The applicant contends that the property is n~t developable
under existing zoning for the following reasons:
l. The location of the property at a major intersection
with surrounding intensive and industrial type uses
makes any residential use unfeasible.
2. The property has considerable muck deposits. All
building pads will have to be demucked at a
considerable expense. The total builcing coverage of
the Planned commercial Development is much less and
more compact than a High Density residential
development. The applicant does not believe a
residential project can absorb the ccst of this
process.
G. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is
reasonably related to the needs of the neightorhood and the
City as a whole.
Boynton Beach Blvd. PCD
Applicant's Response
Page 4 of 4
The applicant has submitted a market analysis indicating that
this project is supportable by existing and ftcture
populations. The staff has accepted the findings of this
analysis. This use will have no effect on the central
Business District as there are no properties jn that area of
similar configuration which would allow a devE:lopment of this
type.
H. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the City
for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already
allowed.
The applicant has reviewed the City inventory of commercial
lands and has determined there are no other SJ,tes of similar
size, snape, and location except for the compccnion petition,
Knuth Road, PCD. The value of this site is particularly
enhanced by its location at the intersection of Winchester
Boulevard and Boynton Beach Boulevard which is a major
accessway to Boynton Beach Mall.
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
~
~
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O, 80x 310
80)'nton Beach, Florida 33435.0310
(4071734,8111
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
october 26, 1990
Attn: Mr. Kieran J. Kilday
Kilday & Associates
l55l Forum Place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, Fl 3340l
RE: Boynton Beach Blvd. PCD, Knuth Road PCD, & Tara Oaks PCD
Dear Mr. Kilday:
We have recently received the Florida Department of Community
Affairs' Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report (ORC)
which contains responses to the above-referenced comprehensive
Plan amendments, and am forwarding them to you for your review.
A copy has also been provided to the City's Forester/Environmen-
talist, and as soon as his comments regarding the scrub habitat,
and endangered and threatened species are available, they will be
provided to you.
As indicated in the Report, the comments must be addressed,
amendments revised and adopted, and resubmitted for compliance
review within 60 days. Please review the report and provide our
office with your responses to each objection by November 13,
1990.
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
,/
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
@:t;:; \ I ------ ~
--,,-
CHRISTOPHER CUTRO, AICP
planning Director
MR:frb
Enc
C:Ki1day
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
2740 CENTERVIEW DRIVE' TALLAHASSEE. FLORIDA 32399
BOB MARTINEZ
C.......
October 22, 1990
THOMAS G, PELHAM
SKr~.ry
The Honorable Gene Moore
Mayor of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Dear Mayor Moore:
The Department has completed its review of the proposed
comprehensive plan amendments (DCA No. 90-2 and 90S1) for the
city of Boynton Beach, submitted on July 10 and 26, 1990. Copies
of the proposed amendments have been distributed to appropriate
state, regional, and local agencies for their review and their
comments are enclosed.
I am enclosing the Department's objections, Recommendations
and Comments Report, issued pursuant to Rule 9J-ll.010, Florida
Administrative Code. Upon receipt of this report, the city of
Boynton Beach has 60 days in which to adopt the proposed amend-
ments, adopt the amendments with changes, or reject the amendments.
The process for adoption of amendments to local comprehensive'
plans is outlined in s.163.3184, Florida statutes, and Rule
9J-11.01l, Florida Administrative Code. The Objections, Recommen-
dations and Comments Report does not include objections relating
to the stipulated Settlement Agreement amendments; however,
objections have been raised'on the other amendments which have
been submitted.
within five working days of the date of adoption, the city
of Boynton Beach must submit the following to the Department:
Five copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendme~
A signed copy of the adoption ordinance; <:lSl11lEI>
A listing of additional changes not previously reviewedGCT 24 ~
PLANNING DEPT.
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. HOUSINC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. RESOURCE PLANNING AN!, MANA<..tm'.. ~
The Honorable Gene Moore
october 22, 1990
page Two
A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any,
which were not included in the ordinance; and
A statement indicating the relationship of the additional
changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and
comments Report.
The above amendments and documentation are required for the
Department to conduct the compliance review, make a compliance
determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent.
As a deviation from the requirement above, you are requested
to provide one of the five copies of the adopted amendment
directly to the Executive Director of the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning council. The regional planning councils have been asked
to review adopted amendments to determine local comprehensive
plan consistency with the Comprehensive Regional policy Plan.
Please forward these documents to the regional planning council
concurrent with your transmittal to the Department. Your cooper-
ation is appreciated in this matter.
If you have any questions, please contact Robert Pennock,
Chief, Bureau of Local planning, or Maria Abadal, Plan Review
Administrator at (904) 487-4545.
sincerely,
~a~ r.or.
Division of ~:~o~~e planning
and Management ~
RGN/tmm
Enclosures: Revi$w Agency Comments
cc: James J. Golden, Interim planning Director
Daniel M. Cary, Executive Director, Treasure Coast
Regional planning council
"
Memorandum
Page 2
Pursuant to a telephone discussion with Terry Manning of DCA:
L
Terry Manning has not had an
Boynton's proposed amendments but
on the phone she noted which ones
opportunity to
wh i Ie ta I king
were ours.
review
to her
2.
Additional information (from
appropriate at this time and
reviewed. (Identical packets
submitted to the various review
something after the fact would
their format.)
any source) would not be
would probably not be
of information are
agencies and to submit
not be in keeping with
3. Subsequent to review by the appropriate agencies an ORC
report will be submitted to Boynton Beach by October 21,
1990. She did invite us to contact her if after
reviewing the ORC report we had any questions or
comments. The City has 60 days after receiving the ORC
report to review and respond to it. (This includes also
the final adoption of the proposed Plan amendments.)
4. She did say that DCA will probably raise their most
common objection for these parcels which is, "How does
this affect the Land Use Element overall?". The
objection is less an objection to the Commercial than is
an objection that the impact has not been addressed one
way or another. (In our case the issue of more
commercial than required by their Plan.)
5.
If the proposed amendments
objections contained in the
addressed by the City of
justification provided.
are adopted then
ORC report should
Boynton Beach and
any
be
a
6. Within five working days after adoption, Boynton must
submit the adopted Camp Plan Amendment Ordinance and
their responses to the ORC report.
7. DCA then has 45 days after adoption to review the
Ordinance and the City responses to the ORC report prior
to issuing their Notice of Intent that the Plan either
is or is not in compliance. (This is where the second
review bY Treasure Coast takes place.) Terry noted here
that 90% of the time Plan amendments are accepted.)
Notes:
Terry has made
clarification
a note
whi Ie
to contact
reviewing the
me if she
amendments
needed any
prior to
,
..
Memorandum
Page 3
-'
submitting the ORC report. She said that she is very
familiar with the Boynton Beach situation not only because
she is on the team that reviewed Boynton's Camp Plan
initially, but because the former Planning Director, Tim
Cannon is coming to work for DCA.
Terry wi 11 also be reviewing
Amendments and was on the team
County Plan initially.
Palm Beach County's Camp Plan
that reviewed the Palm Beach
,
<
,
Kilday & AlISOCiat8S
Landscape Architectsl Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite l00A
West Palm Beach. Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 . Fax: (407) 689-2592
0./,"1_ f'u7NIi,IV&
f7w
MAILED OUT
,,'
City of Boynton Beach Planning
200 N. Seacrest
Boynton Beach, Fl 33435
DME September 18, 1990
PROJECT NAME
,.~; 1""lrol.....cr.~~r.:o.r
ATT
J. Scott Miller
PROJECT NUMBE~
799.5 & 799.9
WE TRANSMIT
@ HEREWITH
o UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA
THE FOLLOWING
o PRINTS 0 SPECIFICATIONS 0 ADDENDUM
DTAAc,NGS,SEP,AS 0 SUBMITTALS 0 CHANGE ORDER
o SHOP DRAWINGS QcOPY OF LETTER 0
THIS IS TRANSMITTED TO YOU:
ACTiON CODE:
o FOR APPROVAL 0 FDA REVIEW & COt.AMENT
@.OR YOUR USE D AS REQUESTED
A REvIEWED
B NOT REVIEWED
C REVIEWED & NOTED
o REsuBMIT
E 00 NOT RESUBMIT
F RESUBMIT FOR FilES
NO OF DATE DRAWING DESCRIPTION/REMARKS ACTION
COPIES OR ITEM NO CODE
1 9-13-90 Attached please find a copy of a memorandum
that was sent to Bill Winchester & Mike Schroede r.
If you should have any questions, please do not
hesitate to contact our office!
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE
COPIES TO
WITH ENCLOSURE
o
o
o
o
o
R- ~--~~-~D
. .D ''l..., j~ -1 <.,t jJ 't
FilE CODE
~tP 19 1990
SHOP DRAWING DIV
CITY i'lI\;,':\C:::<;
a@k/JfJ~
SIGNED
For:
Chuck Yannette
,
,
....
.""
Kilday & Associates
Landscape Architects/Planners
, 551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(4071 689-5522 . Fax: 1407) 689-2592
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: Bill Winchester
Mike Schroeder
FROM: Linda Kender
DATE:
September 13, 1990
RE: DCA & Treasure Coast Review LUP's
OUR FILE NO: Winchester 799.5 & 799.9
I spoke to Terry Hess of Treasure Coast Regional
Council explained again about the review process
steps as follows:
Planning
with the
1.
Draft amendments (as approved
required to be sent to Treasure
day time frame allowed for
begins from receipt of the
Treasure Coast also requests
municipality as wella
by the municipality) are
Coast from DCA. The 45
review by l'reasure Coast
amendments from DCA.
courtesy copies from the
2_
An ORC (Objections~ Recommendations and
is then assembled at DCA and is sent
Beach within 90 days from the time
amendments were transmitted to DCA.
Comments) report
back to Boynton
that the draft
3. Boynton Beach receives the DCA ORC report and schedules
the final adoption within 60 days.
4. After final adoption the amendments then go back to DCA
and Treasure Coast for a second review for consistency
and report back to DCA. DCA has 45 days after final
adoption of the amendments to respond to Boynton Beach.
5. Terry Hess further expects that the trend will be that
local governments will have to review proposed site
specific Land Use amendments in the light of impacts on
other elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
-
R E HIT TAN C E A D V ICE
PAY HEN T DUE I N 1 5 DAY
1035-0784-7
ACCOlM' NUMBER
4-038-13390
INVOICE NUMBER
07/20/90
DATE
~l~~f~o~~~!!~;
7AH - 7PH CST
I 195.00 I
AHOUNT DUE
1
AIRBILLS
1035078440381339089001950085
DON 0 T S TAP LED R PAP E R C LIP
TO INSURE PROPER CREDIT, PLEASE RETURN
THIS OOCUMENT HITH YOUR REHITTANCE
10086**************** 5-DIGIT 33425
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
S RANDOLPH
POBOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33425-0310
RECEIVED HAIl PAYMENT TO:
FEOERAL EXPRESS CORP
PO BOX 1140 DEPT A
MEMPHIS, TN 38101-1140
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
JUL 25 1990
~~-o.!..~~ ___ __----9UEST10NS1 CALL. OUR BIL.L1NG SERVICE CENTER, 800-622-1147, 7 AM - 7 PM (CST) MONDAY-FRIDAY
SENDER ACTIVITY SUMMARY
PAGE 1 OF ,
DATE 07/20/9(
INVOICE NO. 4-038-13390 ACCOUNT NO. 1035-0784-7
TRACKING NOS SENDiR'S NAME RECIPIENT INFORMATION AND PACKAGES NET
REFERENCE ANO DDRESS PROOF OF DELIVERY & HEIGHT SERVICES CHARGES CHARGES
7240983223* CITY OF BoYN-JON R PENNOCK CHMF l~ is HUNDR~g"l PO 190.00
~ TY OF BOYNTON BEACH ~DCAL PLANNI STATE OF FLA ADORE oRR 5.00
00 EAST B2YUTON BEACV BL~ 740CENTERVIEH131
oYNTON BE C , L 3435 TALLAHASSEE 'Fb 32399 AA
D~LIVERED Ot/~7/90 9:27 ---------
91748694 2 SHIPPED 07/16/90 S GNEO: L.K M 3/ 90 195.00
SENDER SUBTOTAL 195.00 PAY THIS AHDUNT 195,00
FeclEx~l4$5111
aUESTIONS? CAL.L. OUR BILLING SERVICE CENTER, 800-622-1'47, 7 AM - 7 PM (CST) MONDAY-FRIOAY
pro
,.,,1'l
BILL TO: ~ITY OF BOYNTON 8EACH
00 EAST BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
OYNTON 8EACH, FL 33435
ACTIVITY SUMMARY PAGE 2 OF 9
DATE 07/20/9
INVOICE NO. 4-038-13390 ACCOlM' NO. 1035-0784-
* ~~FE~CT~~SIAUDf~~D I~6fctIR~~oR CORRECT PIECES. HEIGHT, AND SERVICE.
ANY CHANGES HADE ARE
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
2740 CENTERVIEW DRIVE' TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399
BOB MARTINEZ
THOMAS G. PELHAM
Secretary
Governor
July l8, 1990
Mr. Timothy P. Canon
Interim Planning Director
city of Boynton Beach
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-03l0
Dear Mr. Canon:
Thank you for submitting copies of your proposed
comprehensive plan amendment(s) for our review. We have
conducted a preliminary inventory of the plan amendment package
pursuant to Rule 9J-ll.006, F.A.C., to verify the inclusion of
all required materials. Our reference number for this amendment
package is Boynton Beach 90-l.
The submission package appears to be complete, and your
proposed plan amendment will be reviewed in accordance with pro-
cedures contained in Chapter 9J-ll, F.A.C. Once the review is
underway, you may be asked to provide additional supporting docu-
mentation by the review team to ensure a thorough review.
If you have any questions, please contact Georgia Katz at
(904) 487-4545.
sincerely,
RECEIVED
R~ a,...-t.
Chief k'l
planning
) -/
RPjgkr
JUL la 1990
PLANNING DEPT.
Robert pennock,
Bureau of Local
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
-----------. ------""------
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
DRAFT
~
@
100 E. Boynton B..ch Blvd.
P. 0, Box 310
Boynton Beach. florid. 33435.0310
(407) 734.8111
.OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
July lO, 1990
Mr. Robert Pennock, Chief
Bureau of Local Planning
Div. of Resource Planning & Management
State of Florida Dept. of Community Affairs
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
RE: Transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Dear Mr. Pennock:
Enclosed you will find ten copies of documents for the following
Comprehensive Plan Amendments for the City of Boynton Beach:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Knuth Road PCD (Future Land Use Map and
Text Amendments)
Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD (Future Land
Use Map and Text Amendments)
Tara Oaks PUD (Future Land Use Map and
Text Amendments)
Woolbright Place (Poinciana Park) - Future Land Use Map
Amendment
5.
6.
Winchester Property Text Amendment
Adult Entertainment in the Industrial
Land Use Category
7.
Amendments to Levels of Service for
Recreation Facilities
8.
Comprehensive Plan Amendments Pursuant to
Stipulated Settlement Agreement Between
The City and the Florida Department of
Community Affairs
TO: Mr. Robert Pennock
-2-
July lO, 1990
The above Amendments were considered by the Planning and Zoning
Board on Tuesday, June 12, 1990, sitting as the Local Planning
Agency, and also by the City conunission on Tuesday, June 19,
1990, at public hearings which were held after due public notice.
The Boynton Beach City conunission has approved the transmittal of
these Plan Amendments to the Department of Conununity Affairs.
with respect to Rule 9J-l1.006, which outlines the procedure and
requirements for transmitting Plan Amendments, please be advised
of the following:
(l)(a) l. The proposed month of adoption for these Plan
Amendments will be based upon the date of completion of
DCA's review within the 90 day statutory review period.
It is anticipated that second reading of the ordinances
to annex, amend the future land use element/text and
rezone (where appropriate for each Amendment) will
occur within 60 days of receipt of conunents from your
agency. Assuming that the documents and information
contained herein are sufficient, it is anticipated that
second and final reading of the appropriate ordinances
for these Amendments will occur in November of this
year.
(l)(a) 2. The proposed Amendments are not in an area of critical
state concern.
(l)(a) 3. The proposed Amendments do not constitute an exemption
from the twice per year calendar limitation on the
adoption of Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
(l)(a) 4. The Amendments are not proposed to be adopted under a
joint planning agreement.
(l)(a) 5. Contact person: James J. Golden
senior City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Fl 33425-03l0
Tel: (407) 738-7490
(l)(b)I&2.Ten copies of the entire amended Comprehensive Plan
are enclosed, since this transmittal includes
Amendments which address the Notice of Intent to Find
The Comprehensive Flan Not in Compliance. The
information required for items (l)(b) land (l)(b) 2
is included on the Future Land Use Map.
TO: Mr. Robert Pennock
-3-
July lO, 1990
(l)(b) 3.The size of the subject property for Amendments No. 1
through 4 is contained within the staff report for
these Amendments, and is included on the master plans
for Amendments No. 1 through 3. The size of the
subject property is not applicable to Amendments No. 5
through 8.
(l)(b) 4.For Amendments No. l, 2 and 3 above, a description
of the availability of and the demand on public
facilities is provided as outlined below:
Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water
Correspondence is provided from the City
Utilities Department under cover sheet
entitled "Sanitary Sewer and Potable
Water" for each of the 3 projects.
Solid Waste
Correspondence is provided from the Palm
Beach County Solid Waste Authority under
cover sheet entitled "Solid Waste" for
each of the 3 projects.
Drainage
Correspondence is provided from the Lake
Worth Drainage District under cover
sheet entitled "Drainage" for each of
the 3 projects.
Traffic Circulation
All documentation concerning traffic can
be found in Exhibit "D" of the 3 staff
repo~ts (planning Dept. Memorandums No.
90-157, 90-16l, and 90-l77), with the
exception of the applicant's traffic
impact analysis, which can be found
under the cover sheet entitled
"Applicant's Traffic Impact Analysis"
for each of the 3 projects.
Recreation
With respect to Amendments No. l, 2, and
3, the Tara Oaks PUD, Amendment No.3,
represents the only residential
development of these projects. The
recreation issues are outlined in the
staff report (planning Dept. Memorandum
No. 90-177) and the conceptual details
are shown on the proposed master plan
for the PUD.
TO: Mr. Robert Pennock
-4-
July 10, 1990
With respect to Amendment No.4, the Woolbright Place land use
element amendment for poinciana Park was submitted pursuant to a
Stipulation and Settlement Agreement for Tradewinds Development
Corporation vs. The City of Boynton Beach. The language
concerning public facilities for this development is contained in
The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Support Documents
(Volume No.1), Section VIII, Planning Area 8, item 8.a. on page
9l. A copy of page 9l can be found in the agenda packet behind
planning Dept. Memorandum No. 90-l48. The remaining Amendments--
No. 5 through 7--are non-development related Amendments that do
not create a demand for public facilities.
(l)(b) 5. Information regarding the compatibility of
the proposed Future Land Use Map Amendments
with the Land Use Element objectives and
policies and those of other affected elements
can be found in the staff report for
Amendments 1 through 4, as outlined below:
1. Knuth Road PCD - Planning Dept.
Memorandum No. 90-161
2. Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD - Planning
Dept. Memorandum No. 90-l57
3. Tara Oaks PUD - Planning Dept.
Memorandum No. 90-177
4. Woolbright Place (Poinciana Park) -
Planning Dept. Memorandum No. 90-l48
(1) (c)
The staff recommendations are contained within the
memorandum listed under item (l)(b) 5 for Amendments 1
through 4. For Amendments 5 through 8, the staff
recommendations are contained in the following
memorandums:
1. Reference Amendment *5-Winchester Text
Amendment - Planning Dept. Memorandum
No. 90-163
2. Reference Amendment *6-Adult Entertain-
ment in the Industrial Land Use Category -
Planning Dept. Memorandum dated June 4, 1990
from Timothy P. Cannon to the Planning and
Zoning Board
TO: Mr. Robert Pennock
-5-
JUly 10, 1990
3. Reference Amendment #7-see par. 4 below
4. Reference Amendment #8-Comprehensive Plan
Amendments Pursuant to stipulated Settle-
ment Agreement Between the City and the
Florida Department of Community Affairs and
the Planning Dept. Memorandum dated June 4, 1990
from Timothy P. Cannon to the Planning and
Zoning Board
The recommendations from the Local Planning Agency (Planning and
Zoning Board) are outlined below:
l. Knuth Road PCD - Planning Dept. Memorandum
No. 90-l86
2. Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD - Planning Dept.
Memorandum No. 90-l85
3. Tara Oaks PUD - Planning Dept. Memorandum No.
90-187
4. Woolbright Place (Poinciana Park) - Planning
Dept. Memorandum No. 90-l83
5. Winchester Text Amendment - planning Dept.
Memorandum No. 90-l88
6. Adult Entertainment in the Industrial Land Use
Category Planning Dept. Memorandum No. 90-l90
7. Comprehensive Plan Amendments Pursuant to
Stipulated Settlement Agreement between the
City and the Florida Department of Community
Affairs - Planning Dept. Memorandum No. 90-l91
8. Amendments to Levels of Service for Recreation
Facilities - Planning Dept. Memorandum No. 90-l91
The recommendations from the Local Government Body (City
Commission) are outlined below:
l. Knuth Road PCD - see attached draft approval letter
2. Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD - see attached draft
approval letter
3. Tara Oaks PUD - see attached draft approval letter
TO: Mr. Robert Pennock
-6-
July 10, 1990
4. Woolbright place (Poinciana Park) - see attached
draft approval letter
5. Winchester Text Amendment - see attached draft
approval letter
6. Adult Entertainment in the Industrial Land Use
Category--the City Commission unanimously
recommended approval of this proposed Amendment
7. Same as *8 below
8. comprehensive Plan Amendments Pursuant to
Stipulated settlement Agreement Between the
City and the Florida Department of Community
Affairs--the City Commission unanimously
recommended approval of these proposed
Amendments
If you have any questions concerning these Plan Amendments,
please do not hesitate to contact Senior Planner James J. Golden.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
~J!~
TIMOTHY P. CANNON
Interim Planning Director
JJG:frb
Encs
cc: Kieran Kilday
Central File
C:DCADraft
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
DRAFT
@
.~
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O, Box 310
Boynlon Beach, Florida 33435.0310
(407) 734,8111
June 26, 1990
Kilday & Associates
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
l55l Forum Place, Bldg. lOOA
West Palm Beach, FL 3340l
RE: Winchester Text Amendment - File No. 468
Dear Mr. Kilday:
Please be advised that on 1990, the City commission
approved the above-referenced text amendment subject to the staff
recommendations contained within Planning Department Memorandum
No. 90-l63 (see attached).
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
TIMOTHY P. CANNON
Interim Planning Director
JJG:cp
Encs
A:KJKilday
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
D R AFT
@
100 E. Boynlon Beach Blvd.
P. 0, Box 310
Boynlon Beach, Florida 33435.0310
(407) 734.8111
June 26, 1990
Kilday & Associates
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. lOOA
West Palm Beach, FL 3340l
RE: Woolbright Place (Poinciana Park) - File No. 47l
Dear Mr. Kilday:
Please be advised that on 1990, the City Commission
approved the above-referenced land use element amendment subject
to the stipulation that the subject parcel be conveyed by the
City concurrently with the conveyance to the City of the park
site which is required to be dedicated for the Woolbright Place
PUD.
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
TIMOTHY P. CANNON
Interim Planning Director
JJG:cp
Encs
A:KJKilday
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
D R AFT
@
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O, Box 310
Boynton Beach. Florida 33435.0310
(4071734,8111
June 26, 1990
Kilday & Associates
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
l55l Forum Place, Bldg. lOOA
West Palm Beach, FL 3340l
RE: Tara Oaks PUD - File No. 90-473
Dear Mr. Kilday:
Please be advised that on
approved the above-referenced land
rezoning subject to the following:
1990, the City Commission
use element amendment and
l) Staff comments contained within Planning Department
Memorandum No. l77 (see attached).
2) An amendment to the Future Land Use Element Support
Documents of the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate
conditions of approval and to mitigate the impact of the
proposed PUD on adjacent properties (see attached).
3) Incorporation of the agreement between the homeowner's and
the developer in the ordinance to rezone to PCD.
4) Construction of the landscaping, buffers, and walls
presented to the City Commission.
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
TIMOTHY P. CANNON
Interim planning Director
JJG:cp
Encs
A:KJKilday
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
DRAFT
@.
.'.,r.,...
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. 0, Box 310
Boynton Beech, flo,lde 33435.0310
(407) 734.Blll
OFFICE OF '!HE PLANNIN:; DIRECIOR
June 25, 1990
Kilday & Associates
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
l55l Forum Place, Bldg. lOOA
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
RE: Knuth Road PCD - File No. 494
Dear Mr. Kilday:
Please be advised that on 1990, the City Commission
approved the above-referenced annexation, land use element
amendment, text amendment, and rezoning subject to the following:
l) staff comments contained within Planning Department
Memorandum No. 90-l61, with the exception of the requirement
that the mechanical equipment be roof-mounted. The language
in the proposed text amendment to Area 7.j is to be modified
to allow the mechanical equipment to be ground mounted.
2) Compliance with the Municipal Implementation Ordinance of
the Palm Beach county Traffic Performance Standards
Ordinance, if the applications are sUbsequently determined
to have been submitted incomplete prior to February l, 1990.
3) Incorporation of the agreement between the homeowner's and
the developer in the ordinance to rezone to PCD.
4) Construction of the landscaping, buffers, and walls
presented to the City Commission.
5) Construction of Knuth Road north of the L.W.D.D. L-25 Canal,
including the canal crossing, if this PCD proceeds with
construction prior to the Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD.
6) Prohibition of automobile repair and servicing within the
site.
TO: Mr. Kieran J. Kilday
-2-
June 25, 1990
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
TIMOTHY P. CANNON
Interim Planning Director
JJG:cp
Encs
A:KJKilday
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
DRAFT
@
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310
(407) 734.B III
June 26, 1990
Kilday & Associates
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
RE: Bovnton Beach Boulevard PCD - File No. 493
Dear Mr. Kilday:
Please be advised that on 1990, the City commission
approved the above-referenced annexation, land use element
amendment, text amendment, and rezoning subject to the following:
1) Staff comments contained within planning Department
Memorandum No. 90-157, with the exception of the requirement
that the mechanical equipment be roof-mounted. The language
in the proposed text amendment to Area 7.k is to be modified
to allow the mechanical equipment to be ground mounted.
2) Compliance with the Municipal Implementation Ordinance of
the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance standards
Ordinance, if the applications are subsequently determined
to have been submitted incomplete prior to February 1, 1990.
3) Incorporation of the agreement between the homeowner's and
the developer in the ordinance to rezone to PCD.
4) Construction of Knuth Road north of the L.W.D.D. L-25 Canal,
including the canal crossing, if this PCD proceeds with
construction prior to the Knuth Road PCD.
5) Construction of the landscaping, buffers, and walls
presented to the City commission.
6) Prohibition of automobile repair and servicing within the
site.
---~ -- -- -_._~------,---_..,.._-
TO: Kieran Kilday
- 2 -
June 25, 1990
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
TIMOTHY P. CANNON
Interim Planning Director
JJG:cp
Encs.
A:KJKilday
) U (I;;;;
"
; CJ ~H^:
I"ii
P 1
[~~, n r'I'j"
i"il iiJ r
j C' ': t
+ ,,) i
F' -I IT! ::,:;,:;.: h
'~" 1 J t.: 1"1 ';: t j"
IJ nt \'
':? t ~
,', c.'.
I" ,l-'
v.,I€
p ,'~j 1 m L' s .;' :. i~1
,-I
, .
:~; ~~ -tj 0 '':;
",:t.
(Jc,t i j:1 ::! t i ~,n
f ~,:^I ;I::';: ,51 t 0 i ',I P r 1 " ':.: ,J t
13:
Uj'. cI',t
"I'f ..6:J ('
! :3
o (\i~I' 3Pcri~~n:0
L' --:: 11 f'i
o t:~_"
<,,..,!'; t;."
:?-; i:7 .:i
-~ .3~' e
i~- 1:
<:..u ("
.'\r) j" i
1'3.
h-:c'\ \
:?'::j:::':
1-. _,.1
Ll :i'..!\'
-~' (~
.,.f
'-,'I
:9 f) < :::::('i' i"espo:~(I.::n"~:
t :1;: -f-::) 'r lov,,' nq.
",':: /\
.::' i,! ::>'1 -j
,]:"inqs (."11 tn;:.:! i:~0+'"lt';OII
fl1';' c:t ; nq 2-; , Th,~ -:,r'['] tit
of +1 i:3 ,3D:]: ,':-it~:' ,'::(1 I,
~ "'1::]"1 ;;:, ',I"': II _ i n t :'1
',Il~? r
~I ,;:)
i:--:)n ti n 1.1 .:1
! nc~, 1,10,'1 t
,:it
t.i'--,;; i',1,:,":,
':',('1
I I"
,..,_..1
JI,,!
.:'-!\":':l
,":,,::,:, :-' t i (--,
:1 "'S':: i~o;-th
+
,
'-il
L. ,\^.I, D, D
!'
3 j-,
'(
':)-<
"' -C '3 + h ?j
1 ~.! 'J:~' .
or':"
=;rc"r-lj~r-1c;::
t r'c'rri
L
::::~
',,:Q'I
,,"1,,-,'....
,_!,;(
:~I
:li J "~ r: -i t'1.:-,
:~J,
,31
-1 s
,-, h
,
j u-I
t ':'," i--' ~:' V I:' \il'
: :J; 1 ~J (J i). n_
'! 'I},
b\/
+-1....,.
I';;:
f
n !l'i i~l J
~-', ~, f ,-,
,:=:~:l ::1 - " ;'\ J
t h '-: i ~_
I" "Ii~m'; .::; ~7,1 (,. ti ,'1 t
wi I.! 1
f', ~
ti i~(~ nd
':J, r-fi':-~:: t i :1
be ,:,'1- t:: ,e
I' ,;~ 1]
I,
Ii, cl' -I ,:1 J ~r
't,I'if th,--jj"'.:3'-',,iil
, ,'(I
c: ,::l t ..: d '_! U i ! ~ ~l G .
:3 t t ,-:'j '.::: h
1nso'
~::;) i'l d ";
1 '-~
'; '-,
[' (:\
,::)-!
:':1 n Ii:; t t '::! "I t~,
i.
") IJ t 1- ,:)f
oj en '~he n
j'" t:l
the e':"'y'!itCi'i c
t ['1" 1,:1\"
I,
i-i< ';:' I" r. , ..;;:1
I"! ,~~l ' ':): ,:1
C'i' t:^i .;-- 4
ell;::; Uii'l " r'p:)i' t':-;,! .3i
,~- ,_I l: 'Ii (J'I ,i ~~:' 0 \' ii ton '-, E
. ,
-~' h
f/
\" . L
'~; t ~._
.3 t': ~j
-''.'';
i< i-iuth
1'1,1<
,3
'(,:, d
,~" r t I.,
.Iw,
~I '~;j ~.
,\ ,'~ -:c- ,
': t'.:
i", t! \ 1 n 1'.1"1
;': () (:: :.c .::~ :;:.~ '::' f
I',,' :'?!:.!,,:;;r '1 t"iJ
t h Lli'i! t'Ct'
" l I \.:: ' !J ,; I:
i nth,o;:
ni,'::' "
,., '~',
:'1 ','!:
li:'\
f
..1 J
:~ i~ ,,::- ',,' ':
,,' - ',",
r' '~' [ ',,;,,i
':1 i!
t i") ,',
,I
, 1",0
':~ c'
11(',;1'1::1(:':1 t !l:,_t ,;:!li i',il)S:2'\f.:1
" 'I :..~ i' -I hl nth e" _ ;:' e,~: I '. d a l' 1
ni'i <,31: i-, ,::1!)r: 1 i :::it '-),1:2: ',:1, 11 ,',
'! S
C::U:)1111 tt d
',:-:\
n 0- ;<.. t: . \'-'.'>~' l.
I, h pi' CUI' + ~ ;~ __
j,':,
:..0::
t<
');:\1"<:'
1-'" :: I,' ;1"1 'i r:::- ,~i
,:1"':0
I~\ i :::. t' '':
ifl :"1;:,
I', j
L n't i i If! ::,1
!',t ;;,' i fi
If, 1 [",
-; i'l t C,
.'",
.1;
,;j:0
:.!m~~ iidril":: t] t t
1 j (,71 t' \.! -~ \'
I,:
'1.
t t r
(. 'I ~
I,:;
i";+
t' I~
.'i
T'(;
,j~,::: l' ;" ,::. n'r t ~'I
t::'~. 'j t (., t::1
(i'l (, j ,0; i'i (I
:-! I, h _ ~,j,)::) 1
I--l.._
, :,,:"
. ,
I,
t h _ ---'
:J ') :1 -,t
"li:'O,
d t 11'_"
.1.-] 1.
I.
'.
1
t,: ,:1 t
"" t i U 'j
,:111 ot
~ V'2 'I C'r) ":- i'
:..--: Ui)nll'~ t,:~
,.
. "
f
,\C ,<:1
c n :~, ,loll
ill"
. "'It' 1 i
,.
"
tc
:'.':' t"; 'I' ';1
t in
IT'! i)F R Y~)~O(! SCA ~t
,Iaill
;"1 "
~I (' 0- li
1.,/ P 1 .~" (' c'
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
DRAFT
~
~
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310
14071734.8111
June 26, 1990
Kilday & Associates
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
RE: Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD - File No. 493
Dear Mr. Kilday:
Please be advised that on 1990, the City Commission
approved the above-referenced annexation, land use element
amendment, text amendment, and rezoning subject to the following:
1) Staff comments contained within planning Department
Memorandum No. 90-157, with the exception of the requirement
that the mechanical equipment be roof-mounted. The language
in the proposed text amendment to Area 7.k is to be modified
to allow the mechanical equipment to be ground mounted.
2) Compliance with the Municipal Implementation Ordinance of
the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards
Ordinance, if the applications are subsequently determined
to have been submitted incomplete prior to February 1, 1990.
3) Incorporation of the agreement between the homeowner's and
the developer in the ordinance to rezone to PCD.
4) Construction of Knuth Road north of the L.W.D.D. L-25 Canal,
including the canal crossing, if this PCD proceeds with
construction prior to the Knuth Road PCD.
5) construction of the landscaping, buffers, and walls
presented to the City Commission.
6) prohibition of automobile repair and servicing within the
site.
TO: Kieran Kilday
- 2 -
June 25, 1990
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
TIMOTHY P. CANNON
Interim planning Director
JJG:cp
Encs.
A:KJKilday
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
D R AFT
@
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435.0310
14071734-8111
June 26, 1990
Kilday & Associates
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
RE: Tara Oaks PUD - File No. 90-473
Dear Mr. Kilday:
Please be advised that on
approved the above-referenced land
rezoning subject to the following:
1990, the City commission
use element amendment and
1) Staff comments contained within Planning Department
Memorandum No. 177 (see attached).
2) An amendment to the Future Land Use Element Support
Documents of the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate
conditions of approval and to mitigate the impact of the
proposed PUD on adjacent properties (see attached).
3) Incorporation of the agreement between the homeowner's and
the developer in the ordinance to rezone to PCD.
4) Construction of the landscaping, buffers, and walls
presented to the City Commission.
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
TIMOTHY P. CANNON
Interim Planning Director
JJG:cp
Encs
A:KJKilday
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
DRAFT
@
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310
(407) 734.BIll
June 26, 1990
Kilday & Associates
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
RE: Woolbright Place (poinciana Park) - File No. 471
Dear Mr. Kilday:
Please be advised that on 1990, the City Commission
approved the above-referenced land use element amendment subject
to the stipulation that the subject parcel be conveyed by the
City concurrently with the conveyance to the City of the park
site which is required to be dedicated for the Woolbright Place
PUD.
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
TIMOTHY P. CANNON
Interim Planning Director
JJG:cp
Encs
A:KJKilday
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
D R AFT
@
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310
(407) 734.8111
June 26, 1990
Kilday & Associates
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
RE: Winchester Text Amendment - File No. 468
Dear Mr. Kilday:
Please be advised that on 1990, the City commission
approved the above-referenced text amendment subject to the staff
recommendations contained within Planning Department Memorandum
No. 90-163 (see attached).
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
TIMOTHY P. CANNON
Interim Planning Director
JJG:cp
Encs
A:KJKilday
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
DRAFT
~
@
100 E. Boynton Be.ch Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Booch, florid. 33435.0310
14071 734.8111
OFFICE OF 'llIE PLANNIN3 D~R
June 25, 1990
Kilday & Associates
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
RE: Knuth Road PCD - File No. 494
Dear Mr. Kilday:
Please be advised that on 1990, the City Commission
approved the above-referenced annexation, land use element
amendment, text amendment, and rezoning subject to the following:
1) Staff comments contained within planning Department
Memorandum No. 90-161, with the exception of the requirement
that the mechanical equipment be roof-mounted. The language
in the proposed text amendment to Area 7.j is to be modified
to allow the mechanical equipment to be ground mounted.
2) Compliance with the Municipal Implementation Ordinance of
the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards
Ordinance, if the applications are subsequently determined
to have been submitted incomplete prior to February 1, 1990.
3) Incorporation of the agreement between the homeowner's and
the developer in the ordinance to rezone to PCD.
4) Construction of the landscaping, buffers, and walls
presented to the City Commission.
5) Construction of Knuth Road north of the L.W.D.D. L-25 Canal,
including the canal crossing, if this PCD proceeds with
construction prior to the Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD.
6) Prohibition of automobile repair and servicing within the
site.
TO: Mr. Kieran J. Kilday
-2-
June 25, 1990
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
TIMOTHY P. CANNON
Interim planning Director
JJG:cp
Encs
A:KJKilday
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-199
TO: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
THRU:
Timothy P. Cannon, Interim Planning Director ~
FROM: James J. Golden, Senior City Planner
DATE: June 18, 1990
SUBJECT: Mall Corner, Inc., Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD and
Knuth Road PCD - Requests for Annexation, Land Use
Element Amendment and Rezoning
Attached you will find a copy of the correspondence from Palm
Beach County concerning the above-referenced requests. Said
correspondence should be included in the City Commission agenda
packet for the Boynton Beach Boulevard and Knuth Road PCD
requests.
~/~
S#J. GOLDEN
JJG:frb
Enc
cc: Central File
Board of Count)' Commhlioncra
Carol J. Elmquist, Chairman
Karen T. Marcus, Vice Chair
Carol ^, Ruberts
Ron Howard
Carole Phillips
TEL,No,
Jun 17,90 22:47 P,Ol
,
Coullty Admlnl.trator
Jan Wlnt."
D'l"'rtdlelll or PI.....d"K. z....;"1I .. J"Udl"lI
,
,
~
.ACS1X1LB COVBR SKBBT
TO TIUl A'l'TENT1QJI 0.1 ""S"fY\ &0 \J.t N
I'ROKI
q.""1'\f........ tv'\.O"'"'e ~ I 1'"" L..Pt,N"'. '"
DATil
6//J'1 to TIUI
,
IO:~$'"
NUMBBR 01' 'AGSS IINCLUDrKG COVBR 8KBZT,a~
COMllliN'l'8: A1;,"J"\lU ~ tf- ~t: \'-1,"'6 fltt..~
l'f"t~' Aar....,:t..vr....) .......:-" '.M ~T 0,"","" ~~"'i'
BSljaO I'ILBIJ3/I'ACSIMLB
800 Ilth Strut. WF.5T PALM IJEACli, FLORIVA U406. (40'7) 6'7-4001
palm Beach county Comprehen~ive plan Land U5e Atla~
TEL ~No .
Jun 17,90 22:52 P.ll
June 12, 1990
James J. Golden, senior City Planner
City ot Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
p, O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Re: Request by Charlene Boynton, Donald LoWQ ana the University
of Florida Foundation, Inc, for voluntary anne~ation of
14.76 acres into the city of Boynton Beach.
Dear Mr. GOlden:
The Planning, zoning and Building Department has coordinated the
review of the proposed annexation of 14.76 acreB, qenerally
located on the South side of Boynton Beach BlVd. approximately
950 feet West of Conqress Avenue. County staff oomments are as
follows:
1. P]~NNING DIVISION: stevon Morales, Planner
The planning divi~ion has undergone Q review or the proposed
ann';'.xation in aooordanoe with chapter 171, Florida Statues
and Palm Boach County's Interim Annexation Review Pol icy.
Tho proposod annexation is contiguous to the city Of Boynton
Beach, reasonably oomp~ct, substantially decreases the size
of an Q~istinq service provision enclave, and lies within
the City's future ~nnexation area. However, a small enclave
of land adj aeent to the proposec1 annexation still exists,
Boynton Beach zhould contact the property owners in the
enclave and annex this property as soon as possible.
The land U3. proposed [or tne slte 18 ln conflict with the
Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Atlas
TEL -11I0 .
Jun 17,90 22:47 P.02
~
Page 2 of 4
June 12, 1990
designation. The 1989 comprehensive Plan designates this
property as High Residential 8 allowing a maximum of 8
dwelling units per one acre. The proposed land use for the
site is planned commercial Development. Please be advised
that upon annexation the property is subject to County
development reQulations until the property is rezoned by the
city (171.062, F.S.).
2. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANA~EMENT' Bob Kraus, Environmen-
tal Analyst
'l'he majority of the ..ita appears to ba vgggtated by exotic
apeciea including Melaleuca, Bra~ilian Pepper and Australian
Pinea, Wetlanda exist on-site particularly in the northeaat
oorner of th.. sit... culvertlll were ob..erved alon<] Boynton
Beach Blvd., which disoharge stonnwater from tha road onto
the property. Should any development be proposed for this
property, a wetlands jurisdiotional detel"lnination will be
required by this Department. The site is not located within
a Well field Protection zone.
J. lJRE-RE5CU~, Kathy owens, special projects coordinator
Althou9h there will be a 10S8 of ~'evenue to Palm Beach
county rire Rescue, as a result or: this annexationr the
resIdents will receive better service it annexed. Boynton's
station #2 is 1.8 miles away from this area as compared to
palm Beach county which is J miles away. Additionally, this
annexation WOUld remove a county pocket and alleviate
problems of confusion in service providers.
4.
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT:
planner
Diana Newcomer, Criminal Justice
Annexation of this vacant parcel decreases significantly the
existing pocket. Howeverr inclusion of this parcel into the
city creates an enclave of the industrial area located on
the southeast side. The only access available to the
sheriff'S office to provide service is through the city of
Boynton Beach on 31 Terrace S. This can result in potential
hazards for either city or county emergency responding
vehioles.
The Palm Beach Sheriff'S Office recommends the City of
Boynton Beach pursue alternatives that eliminate potential
hazards for law enforcement.
TEL .No .
Jun 17.90 22:48 P.03
,
PaliJ8 3 or 4
June 12, 1990
5.
TRAfFIC ENGINEERING: Allan Ennis, Development Review
Eng neer
since the application for a city development order was not
complete prior to February I, 1990 (based on our reading of
city correspondence to applicant)r this project is considered
to be subject to 1990 countywide Traffic performance stan-
dards (County Ordinance 90-6 and 90-7).
To Comply with these county ordinances, new traffic reports
need to be submitted by the applicant to your ottice as well
as our office for review.
If the outparcels on each of the shoppinQ center site plans
will be specifically limited to restaurant and financial
institution use, their trip generation should be separately
calculated at thl!! hiqhl!!r ratl!!s that are rl!!prl!!simtative of
these land uses rather than included as part of the general
retail commercial area.
Under test #1 of the new countywide Traffic standard (which
is comparable to the previous unincorporated area standard-
county ordinance 87-18), aignificant project traffic would
Qccur on two links of Boynton Beaoh Boulevard that are
projected to exceea their existin9 ana committed capacities.
No improvements are reoommended for either of these two
links (Military Trail to El Claire Ranch Road and Old Boynton
Road to Interstate ~5). without Bo~e oommitment from these
developers to improve these two links the traffic standard
i5 violated.
G.
l1TILITIl:5:
DiVision
Lorraine peterson, civil Engineer, Engineering
~o comments not 1n WOD'S service area.
7. fINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DEPARTMENT: R1cnaro
Roberts, Assistant Director
The proposed annexation results in the loss of ad valorem
taxes of $1,527 as the above city does not participate in
Fire Rescue MSTU *3 and the Library Taxing Oistrict. No
estimate can be made as to the dollar value of the services
that are no longer provided by the county. In addition,
certain revenue sources, i.e., utility service tax,
franchise fees, sales tax and state shared revenues may be
marginally reduced but cannot be estimated trom available
information. Therefore, the overall fiscal impact cannot be
determined.
TEL.No.
Jun 17,90 22:49 P.04
,
page 4 of 4
June 12, 1990
Thank you for the opportunity to review and respond to these
actions. Please include these comments with your backup materials
tor all meetings and hearings where this annexation is discussed.
The Planninq Division would appreciate it if you could please
provide this office with final annexation ordinanoes so staff can
adjust the County's maps accordingly. Feel free to contact this
office if you have any questions.
sincerely,
Dennis R. Folt~, AICP
Plannin9 Director
Attachmant
OOt Board of County Comroiss!onQrs
Bob Weisman, Administration
Lee Rosenthal, Countr Attorney's Offioe
Donna Kristaponis, planning, Zoning and Building
Bob Krau.., ERR
Kathy Owens, Fire/Rescue
Diana Newcomer, Sheriff's Department
Allan Ennis, Traffic Enqineering Division
Lorraine petersonr Water utilities
Richard Roberts, OFMB
Keith Stahley, zoning Division
Richard r. Morley, Planning Division
Anita Gonzalezr Flanning Division
Steve Morales, Planning Division
FILE: ANNEX2/ANNXBB. RS6
TEL, No,
Jun 17,90 22:49 P,05
", I.
Bo.ud of C<>unl)' Commi..i<>nc,',
elml J. )'Im,!"i", ChJirill.llI
"~HI'll '1', 1\1.1 r('II'\ , Viet' Ch.lir
C.nnl :\, Rulll'rts
I~on Ilo\\'ard
Carole I'hillil"
Count)' Admh.l.t....lo.
Jan Wlnle"
Dopa.lm.nIM Planning. Zoning & Iluildinll
Io'~- _. -.
June 12, 1990
James J. Golden, Senior City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Re: Request by the Winchester family for vOluntary annexation
of 13,87 acres into the City ot Boynton Beach.
Dear. r1r Golden:
Th'" PI anning I Zoning and Building Department has coordinated
the review of the proposed annexation of 13.87 acres, general-
ly located at the southwest corner of Knuth Road and Boynton
Beach Boule....ard. County staff comments are as follows:
1. FUNNING bIVIIHON: ste....en Morale.., Planner
The planning DiviSion has undergona a review of
proposed annexation in aecordancQ with Chapter
Florida statutes and Palm Beach County'", Interim
Annexation Review Policy. The proposed ann..xation is
contiguous to the City of Boynton Beach, reasonably
compact, and lies within the City'c future annexation
area.
the
171,
Th.. land u.... propollO..d for the eite is in conflict with
the Palm S..ach county Comprehensive Plan Land Use Atlas
designation enclosed. The 1989 Comprehensive Plan
de.ignate~ th.. Northern half of the p~operty as
Commercial High Intensity and the Southern half as
800 11th Sln'''I, WEST PALM IlI:ACll, rI.Ol\IUA 33406. (407) 697-4001
f'A 11,"",;(1 (m rf!C:J'c/c,'p p,,'pc.'
TEL_No.
Jun 17,90 22:50 P.06
.
,
Pl'oge 2 of "
June 12, 1990
Commercial Recreation. commercial Recreation provides
for outdoor and indoor recreational rac1l1 ties, golf
courses, parks and recreation, limited excavation, and
accessory tacilities and activities that are an integral
part and supportive or. the recreational r.acll1ty. The
proposed use is Planned commercial Development. Please
be aavised. that upon annexation the property is subject
to county development regulations until the property is
rezoned. by the city (171,062, F.B.).
2.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT:
Environmental Analyst
The property has been cleared of significant vegetation
wi th the exception of scattered slash pine along the
western half of the property. The site is not located
within a wellfield Protection Zone. Scattered piles of
rubble were noted, apparently the remnants of former
buildings,
Bob Kraus,
3. FIRE-EESCUE: Kathy Owens, Special Projects Coordinator
This area is currently being provided fire rescue service
from Palm Beach County Fire Rescue station 51 which is
2.8 miles away. If annexed, Boynton Beach would serve
the area from its Station #2, approximately 2 miles
away. As the area is contiguous to Boynton, we
anticipate few operational problems. There will be,
howeverr a loss of revenue to palm Beach county Fire
Resclle.
4. SHERIFF'S DEpARTMENT; Diana Newcomer, Criminal ~UGtice
Planner
AnneXation of this vacant parcel will not hinde~ ~ervice
levels for the Palm Beach Sheriff'S Office to surrounding
unincorporated areas, nor for the city of Boynton Beach.
The Sheriff'S Office does not find issue with this
request. .
5. ~RAFFIC ENGINEERltlQ: Allan Ennis, Development Review
En91n8&1:"
Since the application for a oity development order was
not compl"te p1:"ior to Feb1:"uary 1, 1990 (basod on out'
1:"eading of oity correspondenoe to applicl'ont), this
projeot is oonsidered to be subjeot to 1990 countywide
Traffio Performance Standards (county Ordinance 90-6 end
90-7) .
TEL No .
Jun 17,90 22:50 P.07
,
Pag'8 3 of 4
June l:ar l1l90
To Comply wit.h t.hese Count.y Ordinances, new trarric
reports need t.o be 5ubmi tted by the applicant to your
office as well as our office for review.
If the outparcels on each of the shopping- center site
plans will be specifically lilllitea to restaurant ana
financial institution use, their trip generation shoula
be separately calcul"ted at the higher rates that are
r..pr..sentative of these lana uses rather than incluaea
as part of the general retail commercial area.
Under test ~l or the new countywide Traffic Standard
(which is comparable to the preVious unincorporated area
st:andara - county Ordinance 87-18) I significant project
trartic WOUld occur on two linKS or Boynton Beach
BOUlevard that are prOjected to exceed their existing
ana committed capacities. No improvements are recom-
mended tor eitner or these two links (Military Trail to
~l claire Ranch Road ana Old Boynton Road to Interstate
95), without some commitment trom these developers to
improve these two linKS the traffic standard is violated.
6. UTILITIES: Lorraine peterson, Civil En9ineer,
Engineering DiVision
No comment - Not in WUD's Service Area
7.
fINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGE'! DEPARTMENT:
Roberts, Assistant Director
The proposed annexation results in the loss of ad valorem
taxes of $23.00 as the above City does not participate
in Fire Rescue MSTU #3 and the Library
Taxing District. No estimate can be made as to the
dollar value of the services that are no longer provided
by the count~. In addition certain revenue sources,
i,e., utility service tax, franchise tees, sales tax and
state shared revenues may be marqinally reduced but
cannot be estimated from available information. There-
fore, the overall fiscal impact cannot be determin~d.
Richard
Thank you for the opportunity to review and respond to these
actions. Please include these comments with your backup
TEL No.
Jun 17,90 22:51 P.08
, ,
Paqa 4 of 4
June 12, 1990
materials for all meetinqs and hearings where this annexation
is discuSls.ad. The Planning Division would appreoiate it if
you could please provide this ottica with rinal annexation
ordinances so staff Can adjust the county's map. aooordingly.
Feel free to contact this otfice if you have any questione.
Sincerely,
DQ~~AICP
Planning D~~~:ibr
Attaohment
001 Board of County Commiesioners
80b weteman, Adminietration
Lee Rosenthal, County Attorney's Office
Donna Krietaponis, Planning, Zoning ana Building
Bob Kraullr EfIM
Kathy Owens, Flpe/Reecue
niana Newoomer, Sheriff's Deparemene
Allan Ennie, Traffic Engineering Division
Lorraine Peterson, water Veilieles
Richard Roberts, OFMB
Keith stahley, zoning DiVision
Richard F. Morley, Planning Division
Anita GOnZalez, Planning Division
steve Morales, Planning Division
FILE: ANNEX2/ANNXBa.R57
TEl No.
Jun 17.90 22:51 P.09
DUllr,1 ur Cuunl>, Cummi..ioll"'"
C.unl ]. 1'11\1<]111>1. ChairlllJn
".lh'n T. MM(,"U:>. Vh.c Chf,h
Carol A. Bolwrt,
ROn Ilo\\'.1I"d
C.rol" I'hillil"
Count)' Admlnldrator
J... WIllie,"
Department or rlanning. Zoning & BuildinG
-
June 12, 1990
James J. Goldenr Senior city Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Post Of rice Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Re: Request b~' Mall corner, Inc. for voluntary annexation of
1.34 acres into the City or Boynton Beach.
Dear Mr, Golden:
The planning, zoning and Building Department has coordinated the
review of the proposed annexation of 1,34 acres, generally located
at the southwest corner of old Boynton Road and Mall Hoad.
County staff comments are as follows:
1. PLANNING I1~IQN: steven 11orales, Planner
The Planning Division has undergone a review of the proposed
annexation and finds it in compliance with Chapter 171,
Florida statutes and Palm Beach County's Interim Annexation
Review POlicy. Annexation of this parcel reduces the size
of an existin<;t unincorporated enclave area, is contiguous
to the City's current boundaries, and is located within the
City's future annexation area.
2. ENVIRONMENTAl. RESOllRr.R1; MANAGF.JIlRNT: Bob Kraus, Environmen-
tal Analyst
~hi~ property appears to have been recently cleared of all
vegetation. An ahove-ground tank wa& noted on the propQrty.
This site is not located within a WQllflQld Protection 20n9.
3. FIRE-RESCUE: Kathy Owens, Speoial Projects Coordinator
This proposed annexation will remove B County pooket inside
Boynton Beach and will be oloeer to Boynton'B Fire station
~2 by one mile. Although Pal~ Beaoh county Fire Resoue will
108e revenue from thi:s annexation, operationally it make"
good planning senae.
800 BIll Strcct , WEST PALM BEACH, nORlIJA JJ406. (4117) 69'-4001
R~ ,..",,,,,,rllVl,,r."'(,!rlrltlo1f'tf'lf
TEL.No.
Jun 17,90 22:52 P.10
Page 2 of :I
June 12, 1990
4.
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT,
planner
Diana Newcomer, criminal Justice
Annexation of this vacant parcel will not create an immediate
service problem for the Sheriff'g oftieo. As the parcel is
boundea on the north by Old Boynton Road (city) and
Winchester Boulovard to the west (county), city patrol ana
emergency response is not hindered. wo are notin9' however,
that this reque.t augments already serpentine boundaries of
the oounty pooket.
The Sheriff' e Office oonoern 19 with future development.
The entire area between Ola Boynton Road, Congress Avenuer
New Boynton west Road and Knuth Road is a mixed service..
area, with the majority Of the land mass belns vacant and
county patrolled. If more pockets are identified for
annll",.tion (.uch an thin request), the boundaries of this
area will become even more serpentine. Service provision to
a mixed services llrea oreates oontusion for re5id.entll and
law enforcement, llnd. potential hazards tor emergency
respondinq unit$.
we would encourage the City of Boynton 8each to adopt
propo.al. that eliminate ~ixed services areas and potential
hCI2larQ5,
~, TRAr~~c ~NGINEERING: Allan Ennisr Development Review
En'llneer
Since tne application for a city development order was not
complete prior to February I, 1~90 (based on our reading ot
city correspondence to applicant), this project is considered
co be SUbject to 15190 countywiae Trarric PertOrl1lance Stan-
dardS (coun~y ordinance 90-6 and 90-7).
To Comply with these county ordinances, new traffic reports
need to be submitted by the applicant to your oftice as well
as our office for review.
If the outparcels on each of the shopping center site plans
will be specitically limited to restaurant and financial
institution use, their trip generation should be separately
calculated at the higher rates that are representative of
these land uses rather than included as part of the general
retail commercial area.
Under test ~l or the new countywide Traffic Standard (which
is comparable to tbe previous unincorporated area standard
County Ordinance 87-18), significant project traffic would
occur on two links of Boynton Beach Boulevard that are
projected to exceed their existinq and committed capacities.
No improvements are recommended for either of these two
links (Military Trail to El Claire Ranch Road and Old Boynton
Road to Interstate 95). without some commitment from these
developers to improve these two links the traffic standard
is violated,
FILE:ANN~X2/ANNX55.R83
TEL.No.
Jun 17.90 72:53 P,12
Page 3 ot 3
June 12, 1990
6.
~:
Di vISIOil
Lorraine Peterson. Civil Enqineer, Engineering
No comment - Not in WUO's Service Area
7. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGF.T DEPARTMENT: Riohard
Roberts, Assistant Director
The proposed annexation result" in the lo&s of ad valorem
taxes of $867.00 as the above city doss not participate in
Fire Rescue MSTU #3 and the Library TaKing Oistrict. No
estimate can be made as to the dOllar value of the services
that are no longer provided by tho county. In elddition
certain revenue sources, i.o., utility service tax, franchise
fees. sales tax and stato Shared revenues may be marginally
reduced but cannot be ostimated from available information.
Therefore, the overall fiscal impact oannot be determined.
Thank yoU for the opportunity to review elnd respond to these
actions. Please inolude ~hoso commonts with your backup materials
for all meetings and hearings whero this annexation is discusse~.
The Planninq Dividon would approoiate it if you could please
provide this otfice with final anneKation ordinances so statt can
adjust the County's maps acoordingly. Feel free to contact this
office if you have any quostions.
SincerQly,
Aetaohm..nt
cc: Board of County Commissioners
Bob weisman, Administration
Le. Rosenthal, County Attorney's ottice
Donna Kristaponis, Planning, zon1ng ana Build1ng
Bob Kraus, EM
Kelthy Owens, Fire/Rescue
Diana Newcomer, sherirf's Department
Allan Ennis, Traffic Eng1neer1n<1 Division
Lorraine Peterson, water Utl1it~es
~iehard Roberts, O~MB
Keith Stahley, ~oning Division
Richard F. Korley, Planning Division
Anita GOnZalez, Plannin9 DiVision
steven Morales, Planning Division
FILE:ANNEX2/ANNXHB.RS3
To: Boynton BeGch, City of
From: Abaton InterfaH
Thu, dun 7,19904:35 PM
755 3866
PGge 2 of 3
Quality: Standard
June 6, 1990
Mr. Jim Golden,
PlanningDepartment
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425.0310
Re: Traffic Impact Review
Knuth Road PCD
Boynton Beach Blvd PCD
Dear Mr. Golden:
As per your request, the traffic impact of the proposed rezoning of the above
referenced sites on projected 2010 traffic has been reviewed. Table 1 below indicates
the cummulatlve impact of rezoning the Beynon Beach Boulevard site (Residential
10.8 to Commercial) and the Knuth Road site (Residential 7.2 and Commercial to
Commercial) would increase projected traffic by approximately 6,000 trips.
Table 1. Increased Trip Projection Estimates
i Proj ect
Size
Units
Trips
propose~' i
New '
I
Trips I Difference i
Current Zoning
,
I
; Knuth Rd peD 77 MP DU 517
I 41,380 Sqft Com 2,303
, Total Knuth Rd 2,820
iBoyntonBeachBldPCD 130 MP DU 801
I Total Impact
i
Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc.
4,818 1,998
4,818 4,017
6,014
Exhibits A and B attached, show the individual rezonings would also increase
on roadways projected to be over capacity. The Knuth Road rezoning
impacts are less than 1 % in alllocations except for Lawrence Road.
traffic
however,
If you have any questions please contact me at (305) 732.7844.
Sincerely,
Walter H. Keller Jr., PE, AICP
President
WHKJus
Attachment
RECEIVED
JUN 7 1990
... '''T
PLAl"I~\' iG ~j!-[ .
-
To: Boynton Beach, City of
From: Abaton InterfaH
Thu, Jun 7, 1990 4:35 PM
755 3866
Page 3 of 3
Quality: Standard
r '
f,.",,;;,.!
E.hibit A. AD81J'li. of at2loninA &:alKlDROD ZOI() Volume.
I Addto'l I
Re. 1
2010 2010 20101 Proj 2010 20101
Roadway From To Cap ADT VIC i ADT ADT V/C:
Boynton Beaen Bd Knuth Rd MallRd 46,400 ~5,5oo 0.77 I L068 36,568 0.79
MallRd COnlU'eii Avenue , 46.400 35,500 0.771 LOO8 36.508 0.79
C(jn~aii Aveoue Old Boynton Rd 46,400 42,400 0.91 385 42,7B5 0.92
Old Boynton Rd 1.95 55,Boo 56,800 L021 329 57,129 1.02
(;o~are'iAvenue NW22ndAve Old Boynton Rd 55,800 56,500 222 56,722 1.021
1.011
Old Boynton Rd Bt1yntonBeachBd 55,800 56,500 1.01 . 253 56,753 1.02 :
BoyntonB...ch Blvd Woolhriaht Rd 46,400 SO,7OO 1.09] 349 51.049 1.10 '
Woolbright Rd (lolfRd 46,400 56,700 1.22 : 203 56,903 1.23 '
LawrenceRd NW 22ndAve Old Boynton Rd 13.100 15,100 1.15 1 159 15,259 1.16
Old Boynton Rd Boyntoo Beach Bd 13,100 15,100 1.15 196 15,296 1.17
,
i
NW22ndAve Military Tr LawrenceRd :30,000 13,000 0.46 I 80 13.980 0.47
,
Souroe: Waiter H. Keiler Jr" lac.
KS. Rogers. (;onsulting Engineer, Inc.
" ,
c" ,. ",l~;",
Exhibit B. Analyai. of Rezon;ng BllJeIIIn Blvd PCD on 2010 Volumes
, I
I Addtn'l Rev Rev I
, 2010 2010 201O! Proi 2010 2010:
i Roadwav From To Cap ADT V/C 1 ADT ADT Y/C i
!
,
, Boynton Beacb Bd Knuth Rd MallRd 46,400 35,500 0.77 i 2,1.17 37,647 0.81
I MallRd COnll1'eii Avenue 46,400 35,500 0.771 2,027 37,527 0.81
(;o'lU'ei8Avenue Old Boynton Rd 46,400 42,400 0.91' 775 43,115 0.93
Old Boynton Rd 1.95 55,800 56,800 1.02 ' 662 57,462 LOS
~n~8s)tveaue NW 22ndAve Old Boynton Rd 55,800 56,500 1.01 446 56,946 1.02
Old Boynton Rd Boynton Be.ch Bd 55,800 56,500 1.01 509 57,009 1.02
BOjntonBCllch Blvd Woolbright Rd 46,400 50,700 1.09 702 51.402 1.11 !
WODlbright Rd GelfRd 46,400 56,700 1.22 409 57,109 1.23
LawrenceRd !I,:V Z211dAve Old Boynton Rd 13,100 15,100 1.15 3Z0 15,4Z0 1.18
Old Boynten Rd Boynton BeachBd 13.100 15,100 l.lS 394 15,494 1.18
NW ZZnd Ave Military Tr La\\TenceRd 30,000 13,\QO 0.% 160 14,060 0.47
Sourc.e: Walter H. Keller Jr" Inc.
KS, Ro~er8, Consulrlng Engineer. Inc. -
City of BOI'l'ltO!l B...ch Comprebe""lve Plan ",'
~"~iD
1"'1" ' . '. ,.
"i ,,~~:, ,i
'\..........--.
.jUN ')' I..
r !'
Board of Count" ComMiulollen
Carol J. Elmquilt, Chairman
Karen T. Marcu.. Vice Chair
Carol A. Roberto
Ron Howard
Carule Philli pi
@",Jnt<<JiM,.<<",,._,,.,,,,,
County Admlnl.trator
Jan Wlmen
June 5, 1990
Department of Engineering
~nd Public Wor~,
Jamu J, Golden
Senior City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd,
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33436-0310
REI TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSES FOR
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD PCD AND KNUTH ROAD PCD
Dear Hr, Golden:
As requested by your letter of Aprl1 3, 1lI~0, the Palm Beach County Traffic
Division has reviewed the traffic reports for the two proposed shopping centers
entitled Boynton Beach Boulevard pee and Knuth Road pce. The following comments
are submitted for your consideration:
1)
Based upon copies of correspondence from your office to the applicant's
agent (Kilday & Associates, Inc.) dated February 13, 1990, we do Mi
consider the applications for these projects to have been complete prior
to February 1, 1990 and therefore vested against the new Countywide Traffic
Performance Standards (County Ordinance 90-7) as per the Municipal
Implementation Ordinance (County Ordinance 90-~), To comply with these
County Ordinances, new traffic reports need to be submitted by the
applicant to your office as well as our office for review,
If the outparcels on each of the shopping center site plans will be
specifically limited to restaurant and financial institution use, their
trip generation should be separately calculated at the higher rates that
are representative of these land uses rather than included as part of the
general retail commercial area.
Z)
3)
Under Test #1 of the new Countywide Traffic Standard (which i~ comparable
to the previous unincorporated area standard - County Ordinance B7-1S},
significant project traffic would occur on two links of Boynton Beach
Boulevard that are proj"cted to Qxceed thaiI' existing and committed
capacities, No improvements are recommended for either of these two links
(Military Trail to E1 Claire Ranch Road and Old Boynton Road to Interstate
95). Without some commitment from these developers to improve these two
links the traffic standard is violated.
RECEIVED
JUN S 1990
"An Equal OppOrtunity - Mflrmaril', Action Employer"
BOX 2429 WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33402-il429 (407) 684~tcoNNINu DEPT.
-
James J. Golden
Page 2
June 4, 199O
Your transm1ttal of these traffic rOpDrts for our roviow is appreciated. Pleaee
do not hesitate to contact me if' you hollvI any questions concerning theee
comments.
S1ncerely,
COUNTY ~IHEER
-rf'-~
11tn A. Enn1a, P.E., AICP
Development Review Engineer
AAE:sb
ce: Audrey Wolfe, Special Projects Coordinator - County Engineering Dept.
File: General - TPS . Municipalities. Traffic Study Reviews
Intersection: "Boynton Beach Blvd. l ~nuth Road"
General - TPS . Municipalities. Vesting Determinations
aae\BB6.KnPCD
.. .to "'" ....... ,.........,..
TE L No.
Jun 17.90 22:47 P.Ol
--<)+/15 {oP!
,
Board of County Commhlioncl'l
Carol J. Elmquist. Chairman
Karen T. Marcus. Vlc~ Chair
Carol A. Rubens
Ron Howard
Carole Phillips '.
Cou"ty Admlnlalrllor
Jan Wlnten
I
I
I
~
Uepartmeltt or PI..""Io'II. %o"i"lI .. a"Udl"lI
FAC8IKILB COVER 8KBBT
TO THE .ll.'1"rEHTIOH OF!
""'S'."" <r..\.kN
DATI!:l
6//,J' / ?(J 'rID I
10: '-IS'"
!
,
,
I
I'IlOMI
q.~~ ""0.""11:\0 J ~I.o.PtNN."
NUMBSR 01' PAGBS (INCLUDING COVBR 8BBBT"~
COMJUlIlT8: A'S~{\l,o"\j ~ ~ +1-.. \'-1."" ~l.~
~IL' ~..,:t...........:II .......:~\ , '- ~T 0.....'1- ~~..i.
BSljaa I'ILB:J3/I'ACSIKLB
800 13th Street. WEST PALM 8E"CH, FLORIVA 13406. (407) 6'7.4001
palm Beach county Comprehensive plan Land U5e Atlas
TEL No,
Jun 17,90 22:52 P,ll
June 12, 1990
James J. Golden, senior City Planner
city ot Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
p, 0, Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Re: Request by Charlene Boynton, Donald Lowe and the University
of Florida Foundation. Inc, for voluntary anne)Cation of
14.76 acres into the city of Boynton Beach.
Dear Mr. Golden:
The Planning. zoninq and Buildinq Department has coordinated the
review of the proPosed annexation of 14.76 acres, generally
located on the South side of Boynton Beaoh Blvd. approximately
950 feet West of Conqress Avenue. county staff comments are as
follows:
1. P]~NNING DlvrSION~ stoven Morales, Planner
The planning divi~ion has undergone a review oC the proposed
ann""xation in aooordanoe with chapter 171, Florida Statues
and Palm aoaoh County's Interim Annexation Review Pol icy.
Tho propo~ed anne~ation ia contiguous to the city or Boynton
Beach, reaGonably compact, lSubstantially decreases the size
of an existing service provision enclave, and lies within
the City's future annexation area. However, a small enclave
of land adjacent to the proposed annexation still exists.
Boynton Beach shOUld contact the property owners in the
enolave and annex this property as soon as possible.
The land U~e proposed ror the site is in conflict with the
Palm Eeach County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Atlas
TEL No.
Jun 17,90 22:47 P.02
f
Page 2 of 4
June 12, 1990
designation. The 1989 comprehensive Plan designates this
property as High Residential 8 allowing a maximum ot 8
dwelling units per one acre. The proposed land use for the
site is planned commercial Development. Please be advised
that upon annexation the property is subject to County
development regulations until the property is rezoned by the
city (171.062, F.B.).
2. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT. Bob Kraus, Environmen-
tal Analyst
The majority of the site appears to be vegetated by exotic
speci.. including Malalauca, Dra~ilian Pepper and Australian
Pine., Watland. exist on-eite particularly in the northea.t
cornar of the site. Culverts were observed alonq Boynton
Beach Dl vd., which disoharge stonnwater from the road onto
the property. Should any development be proposed for this
property, a wetland,. jurisdiotional dete!:'mination will be
required by this Department. The site is not located within
a Well field Proteotion zone.
3. FIRE-RESCUE, ~athy owens, special projects coordinator
Al though there will oe a 1055 of revenue to Palm Beach
county rire Rescue, as a result or this annexation, the
resi~ents will receive better service i' annexed, Boynton's
station #2 is 1.8 miles away from this area as compareo to
palm Beach county Which is 3 miles away. AOOit1onally, th1s
annexation WOUld remove a county pocket and alleviate
problems of confusion in service providers.
4.
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT:
planner
Diana Newcomer, Criminal Justice
Annexation of this vacant parcel decreases signiticantly the
existing pocket. Howeverr inClusion of this parcel into the
city creates an enclave of the industrial area located on
the southeast side. The only access available to the
Sheriff's Office to provide service is through the city of
Boynton Beach on 31 Terrace S. This can result in potential
hazards for either city or county emergency responding
vehicles.
The Palm Beach Sheriff'S Office recommends the City of
Boynton Beach pursue alternatives that eliminate potential
hazards for law enforcement.
TEL No.
Jun 17.90 22:48 P.03
,
paqe 3 of 4
June 12, 1990
5.
TRAfFIC ENGINEERING: Allan Ennis, Development Review
Eng neer
Since the application for a city development order was not
complete prior to February 1, 1990 (based on our reading of
city correspondence to applicant)r this project is considered
to be subject to 1990 countywide Traffic performance stan-
dards (County Ordinance 90-6 and 90-7).
To Comply with these county ordinances, new traffic reports
need to be submitted by the applicant to your office as well
as our office for review.
If the outparcels on each of the Shopping center site plans
will be specifically limited to restaurant and financial
institution use, their trip generation should be separately
calculated at the hiqher rates that are representat,ive of
these land uses rather than included as part of the general
retail commercial area.
Under test #1 of the new countywide Traffic standard (which
is oomparable to the previous unincorporated area standard-
county Ordinance 87-18), .ignificant project traffic would
occur on two links of Boynton Beaoh BOUlevard that are
projected to eKceed their eKistins and cOl1llllitted capaoities.
No improvements are reoommended tor either of these two
links (Military Trail to EI Claire Ranch Road and Old Boynton
Road to Interstate 95). without Bo~e commitment from theee
developers to improve these two links the traffic standard
15 violClteu.
6.
UTlt,ITII!;/) ;
Division
Lorraine peterson, civil Engineer, Engineering
NO comments not in \fUD'S service area.
7. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DEPARTMENT: R1chara
Roberts, Assistant Director
The proposed annexation results in the loss of ad valorem
taxes of $l, 527 as the above city does not participate in
Fire Rescue MSTU #3 and the Library Taxin9 Distr iet, No
estimate can be made as to the dollar value of the s~rvices
that are no longer provided by the county. In addition,
certain revenue sources, i,e., utility service tax,
franchise fees, sales tax and state shared revenues may be
marginally reduced but cannot be estimated from available
information. Therefore, the overall fiscal impact cannot be
determined.
TEL No.
Jun 17,90 22:49 P.04
,
page 4 of 4
June 12, 1990
Thank you for the opportunity to review and. respond. to these
actions. Please include these comments with your backup materials
for all meetings and hearings where this annexation is discussed.
The Planning Division would appreciate it it you could please
provide this office with final annexation ordinances so staft can
adjust the county's maps accordingly. Feel free to contact this
office if you have any questions.
sincerely,
Dennis R. Folt2, AICP
Plannin9 Director
Attachment
001 Board of county Commissionars
Bob Weisman, Administration
Lee Rosenthal, County Attorney's Office
Donna Kristaponis, planning, Zoning and Building
Bob Krau8/ ERM
Kathy Owens, Fire/Rescue
Dillna Newcomer, Sheriff's Department
Allan ~nni5, Traffic Engineering Division
Lorraine Peterson, water utilities
Richard Roberts, OFM5
~eith Stahley, zoning oivision
Richard r. Morley, Planning Division
Anita Gonzalezr Planning Division
Steve Morales, Planning Division
FILE: ANNEX2/ANNXBB. RS6
TEL No.
Jun 17,90 22:49 P.05
,.' I.
Board of Cnunt)' Commissioners
Cd"') J. !'11ll,!";S!, Chair,".11
K,tn'll T. l\t.unl"i. Vice Ch,liI'
r.:.rnl .\. RlIlll'ns
1-(011 Ilo\\'ard
Carole Phillips
Count)' .\dmh.l.t....tor
Jon WIJ1t~"
Department of' Planning. Zoning & Building
..'-,- -
1"1""""11
June 12, 1990
James J. Golden, Senior City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Re: Request by the Winchester family for VOluntary annexation
of 13.87 acres into the City of Boynton Beach.
Dear 11r Golden:
The PI anning I Zoning and Buildinq Department has coordinated
the review of the proposed annexation of 13.87 acres, gp.neral-
ly located at the southwest corner of Knuth Road and Boynton
Beach Boulevard. County staff comments are as follo~II>:
1. PLANNIHG DTVTSION: steven Morales, Planner
The planninq DiviSion has undergon" a roview of
proposed annexation in accordanoe with Chapter
Florida statutes and Palm Deaeh County'e Interim
Annexation Review Policy. The propo~ed annexation is
contiquous to the City of Boynton Beach, reasonably
compact, and lieg within the city'~ future annexation
area. ·
the
171,
Th.. land u.... propo,,"..d for the aite is in conflict with
the Palm Beach county Comprehensive Plan Land Use Atlas
designation enclosed. The 1989 comprehensive Plan
de8!gnates the Northern half of the p~operty as
Commercial Hiqh Intenaity and the Southern half as
800 Ilth S'reet . WEST PALM m,ACII, Fl.ORIIJA 33406. (407) 697.4001
f'tJ 1"1""..'(1(", ,,~(yc!(-'P t:'i.'IIC.'
TEL No.
Jun 17,90 22:50 P.06
Page 2 of 4
June 12, 1990
Commercial Recreation. commercial Recreation provides
tor outdoor and indoor recreational facilities, golf
courses, parks and recreation, limiteQ excavation, and
accessory facilities ana activities tnat are an integral
part and supportive or the recreational racil1ty. The
proposed use is Planned commercial Development, Please
be aavised that upon annexation the property is subject
to county development regUlations until the property is
rezoned oy the city (171.062, F.S.).
2.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT:
Environmental Analyst
Bob Kraus,
The property has been cleared of significant vegetation
wi th the exception of scattered slash pine along the
western half of the' property. ~he site is not located
within a wellfield Protection Zone. Scattered piles of
rubble were noted, apparently the remnants of former
buildings.
3. FIRE-RESCUE: Kathy Owens, Special Projects Coordinator
This area is currently being provided fire rescue service
from l'alm Beach County Fire Rescue Station 51 which is
2.8 miles away. It annexed, Boynton Beach would serve
the area trom its Station 112, approximately 2 miles
away. As the area is contiguous to Boynton, we
anticipate tew operational problems. There will be,
howeverr a loss of revenue to palm Beach County Fire
Rescue.
4. SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: Diana Newcomer, Criminal Ju~tice
Planner
Annexation of this vacant parcel will not hinder aervicQ
levels for the Palm Beach Sheriff'S Office to aurrounding
unincorporated areas, nor for the City of Boynton Beach.
The Sheriff'S Office doea not find iSsue with this
requ@st. .
5. ~RAFFIC ENGINEE~: Allan Ennis, Development Review
F:n9in"..r
Since the application for a oity development order was
not oomplete prior to February 1, 1990 (based on out"
reading of city correspondenoe to applicant), this
projeot is considered to be sUbjeot to 1990 Countywide
Traffio Performance Standards (county Ordinance 90-6 and
90-7) .
TEL No.
Jun 17,90 22:50 P.O?
.
1>.9'0 3 of 4
..Tuno l:lr 1090
To Comply with these County Ordimmces, new trarric
report.. need to be 5ubmi. tted by the applicant to your
office 815 well as our office for review.
If' the outp8rce15 on each of the Shopping center site
plans W'ill be speci1'ically limited to restaurant and
financial institution use, their trip generation Should
be separately calculated at the higher rates that are
representative of these land uses ratner tnan inClUded
85 part of the general retail commercial area.
Under test #l or t!l.e new countyvlCle Traffic Standard
(which is comparable to tne preVious unincorporated area
s.tandara - county ordinance 67-18) I significant project
trartlc WOUld occur on two linxs ot Boynton Beach
BOUlevard that are prOjected to exceed their existing
ana comrni tted capacities. NO improvements are recom-
mended tor eitner or these two links (Military Trail to
E1 claire RanCh Roaa and Old Boynton ~oad to Interstate
9~) , without some commitment trom these developers to
improve tnese two lin~s the traffic standard is violated,
6. UTILITIES: Lorraine peterson, Civil Eng'ineer,
Engineering Division
No comment - Not in WUD's Service Area
7.
fINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET IJEPARTMENT:
Roberts, Assistant Director
The proposed annexation results in the loss of ad valorem
taxes of $23.00 as the above city does not participate
in Fire Rescue MSTU #3 and the Library
Taxing District. No estimate can be made as to the
dollar value of the services that are no lonqer provided
by the count~. In addition certain revenue sources,
i,e., utility service tax, franchise tees, sales tax and
state shared revenues may bf;l marqinally redUCed but
cannot be estimated trom available information. There-
fore, the overall fiscal impact cannot be determined,
Richard
Thank you for the opportunity to review and respond to these
actions. Please include these comments with your backup
TEL No.
Jun 17,90 22:51 P.08
,
PatJe 4 of 4
June 12, 1990
materials for all Meetinqs and hearinqs where this annexation
is discussed. The P1anninq Diviaion would appreoiate it if
yoU could please provide this offico with final annexation
ordinances so staff oan adjust the County'. maps acCOrdinqly.
Feel free to contact this office if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
DQ~~AICP
Planning D;~;~ibr
Attaohment
001 Soard of County Commissioners
Sob weisman, Administration
Lee Rosentha1r County Attorney's attice
Donna Kristaponis, Planning, Zoning ana 8uilaing
!lob Kraus, ];;fU\I
Kathy Owens, Fire/Rescue
Diana Newoomer, Sheriff's Department
Allan Ennis, Traffio ~n9ineerinq Division
Lorraine Peterson, water Utilities
Richard ROberts, OFMB
Keith stahley, zoning DiVision
Richar~ ~. Morley, Planning Division
Anita Gonzalez, Planning Division
steve Morales, Planning Division
FILE: ANNEX2/ANNxaa.RS7
TEL No.
Jun 17,90 22:51 P.09
BOAr.1 or COlin I)' Commi..io..",',
Count" AdmlnllitrAlor
JOIl WIllie,"
c.",,! I. 1'1111<]111>1, Ch~irll\~1l
K,ur:1l 'I'. MM('Il~. Vh..c CIMir
enol A. Hoh.'rt'
Hon IICJ\\",ml
Ciirolt.~ Phillipli
Departmenc of Planning, 2'.oning &; Building
-~ -
-.. ' .-
June 12, 1990
James J. Golden, Senior City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Re: Request b~' Mall corner, Inc. for voluntary annexation of
1.34 acres into the City of Boynton Beach.
Dear Mr. Golden:
The planning, zoning and Building Department has coordinated the
review of the proposed annexation of 1,34 acres, generally located
at the southwest corner of old Boynton Road and Mall Hoad.
County stafr comments are as follows:
1. PLANNING DIVISION: Steven Morales, planner
The Planning Division has undergone a review of the proposed
annexation and finds it in compliance with Chapter 171,
Florida statutes and Palm Beach County's Interim Annexation
Review Policy. Annexation of this parcel redUOes the size
of an existinQ unincorporated enclave area, is contiquous
to the City'S current boundaries, and is located within the
City'S future annexation area.
2. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOHRr.F.il lolANAC;F."MENT: Bob Kraus, Environmen-
tal Analyst
~his property appears to have been recently clearea or all
vegetation. A~ abova-ground tank wa~ notad on the proparty.
This site is not looatad within a Wallfiald Protection Zone.
3. FIRE-RESCUE: Kathy Owens, Special Projects Coordinator
This proposed annexation will remove a County pooket inside
Boynton Beach and will be closer to Boynton's Fire Station
f2 by one mile. Although Palm Beach county Fire Reaoue will
lose revenue from this annexation, operationally it makes
good planning sense.
800 Blh Street, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA Jl406. (407) 6"-4001
~ n';f'lr~rllV1'''r.v.-1f1rln.lnf1'
TEL No.
Jun 17,90 22:52 P,lO
Page 2 of 3
June 12, 1990
4.
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT.
Planner
Diana Newcomer, criminal Justioe
AnnQ~ation of this vacant ~arcel will not creato an immediate
service problem for the Sheritt'. ottioo. As the paroel is
bounded on the north by Old Boynton Road (city) and
Winchostor Boulevard to the West (county), city patrol and
emergency response is not hindered. wo are notins, however,
that this reque.t augments already serpentine boundariee of
the oounty pooket.
The Sheriff's Office oonoern iLl with future development.
The entire area between Old Boynton ROad, Congress Avenuer
New Eloynton west Road and Knuth ROl1d is 11 mixed l5ervioes
area, with the majority of the 1l1"d mass being vacant and
county patrolled. If more pockets are identified for
anneKation (such as this request), the boundaries of this
area will become even more serpentine. Service provision to
a mixed ..ervices lll:'ea creClto" contu"ion for re..idents ami
law enforcement, Clnd potential hazards for emergency
reBpondlnq unit..
we would encourl1ge the City of 80ynton 8each to adopt
proposal. that eliminste mixed services areas Clnd po~ential
hazoards,
" TRAF~IC ~NGINEERING: Allan Ennisr Developmen~ Review
Illn9ineer
5ince ~ne applica~ion ror a ci~y developmen~ oraer was not
complete prior to Fe~ruary 1, 1~90 (~aseQ on our reaaing ot
city corresponaence to applicaht)r ~hls pro)ect 1s considered
to be SUbject to 1990 countywide Trarric performance Stan-
dards (county Ordinanoe 90-6 and 90-7).
To Comply with these county ordinanoes, new traftic reports
need to be submitted by the applicant to your offioe as well
as our office for review.
If the outparcels on each or the shopping center site plans
will be specitically limited to restaurant and financial
institution use, their trip generation should be separately
calculated at the higher rates that are representative of
these land uses rather than included as part of the general
retail commer6ial area.
Under teat #1 of the new countywide Traffic Standard (WhiCh
is comparable to the previous unincorporated area standard
County Ordinance 87-18)r significant project traffic would
occur on two links of Boynton Beach Boulevard that are
projected to exceed their existing and committed capacities.
No improvements are recommended for either of these two
links (Military Trail to E1 Claire Ranch Road and Old Boynton
Road to Interstate 95). without some commitment from these
developers to improve these two links the traffic standard
is violated,
FILE:ANNEX2/ANNXBB.RS~
TEL No.
Jun 17,90 ?2:S3 P.12
page 3 of 3
June 12, 1990
6.
UTILITIES:
Division
Lorraine Peteraon. Civil Engineer, Enginaering
No comment - Not in WUO's Service Area
7. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DEPARTMENT: Richard
Roberts, Assistant Director
The proposed annexation result" in the loss of ad valorem
taxes of $867.00 as the above city do.~ not participate in
Fire Rescue MSTU 113 and the Library TaKing- District. No
estimate can be made as to the dollar value of the services
that are no longer provided by thQ county. In addition
certain revenue souroes, i.o'r utility eervioe ta~, franchise
fees, sales tax and stata sharod revenues may be marginally
reduced but cannot be o"timatad from available information.
Therefore, the overall fisoa1 impact oannot be determined.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and re5pond to these
actions. Please inolude tho~$ comments with your b~ckup materials
for all meetings and hearings whare this annexation is discussed.
The Planning Division would appreoiate it. if you could please
provide this office with final annexation ordinances so staft can
adjust the County's maps acoordingly. Feel free to contact this
office if you have any questions.
sincoralYr
At~..chrn.mt.
CCI Board of County Commissioners
Bob weisman, Administration
Lee Rosenthal, county Attorney's Office
Donna Kristsponis, Planning, Zoning and Building
Bob Rraul!l, EM
Kathy Owens, Fire/Rescue
Diana Newcomer, 3herirr's Department
Allan EnniB, Tratfic Engineering Division
Lorraine Peterson, water Utilities
RiChard ftobertSr orM5
Keith Stahley, zoning Division
Richard F. Morley, Planning Division
Anita GOnZalez, Planning DiVision
steven Morales, Planning Division
FILE:ANNEX2/ANNXHB.RS3
...1
Kilday ft AssociataB
Landscape Architects/ Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 334)1
(407) 689-5522 . Fax: 14071 68')-2592
p~.~
~,p~
June 15, 1990
Mr. vincent A. Finizio
City of Boynton Beach
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Re: Knuth Road p.e.D. - Our File #799.5
Boynton Beach Boulevard P.C.C. - Our File #799.9
Tara Oaks P.U.D. - our File #799.10
Dear Mr. Finizio,
Attached please find three (3) copies of the revised
Master Plans for the above referenced projects. These
have been revised pursuant to your Technical Review
Board comments (3ngineering Department Memoranda Nos.
90-101, 90-102, 90-103) including the specific verbiage
agreed upon at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting on
June 12, 1990.
Sincerely,
Kieran J.
Attachments
cc: Jim Golden; Boynton Beach
Bill winche:;ter
Mike schroeder
Board of County Commissioners
County Administrator
Jan Winters
Carol J. Um'luist, Chairman
Karen T. Marcus. Vice Ch,lir
Carol A. Roberts
Ron Howard
Carole Phillips
Department of Planning, Zoning & Building
June 12, 1990
James J. Golden, senior City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Re: Request by the Winchester family for voluntary annexation
of 13.87 acres into the City of Boynton Beach.
Dear Mr Golden:
The Planning, Zoning and Building Department has coordinated
the review of the proposed annexation of 13.87 acres, general-
ly located at the southwest corner of Knuth Road and Boynton
Beach Boulevard. County staff comments are as follows:
1. PLANNING DIVISION: Steven Morales, Planner
The Planning Division has undergone a review of the
proposed annexation in accordance with Chapter 171,
Florida statutes and Palm Beach County's Interim
Annexation Review Policy. The proposed annexation is
contiguous to the City of Boynton Beach, reasonably
compact, and lies within the City's future annexation
area.
The land use proposed for the site is in conflict with
the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Atlas
designation enclosed. The 1989 Comprehensive Plan
designates the Northern half of the ~~~~; as
commercial High Intensity and the souROCH-V J!lt./
J'" 18 .,
PLANNING DEPT.
800 13th Street. WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIQA 33406. (407) 697-4001
-
@ printed on recycled paper
Page 2 of 4
June 12r 1990
Commercial Recreation. Commercial Recreation provides
for outdoor and indoor recreational facilities, golf
courses, parks and recreation, limited excavation, and
accessory facilities and activities that are an integral
part and supportive of the recreational facility. The
proposed use is Planned Commercial Development. Please
be advised that upon annexation the property is subject
to County development regulations until the property is
rezoned by the city (171.062, F.S.).
2.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT:
Environmental Analyst
Bob Kraus,
The property has been cleared of significant vegetation
with the exception of scattered slash pine along the
western half of the property. The site is not located
within a Wellfield Protection Zone. Scattered piles of
rubble were noted, apparently the remnants of former
buildings.
3. FIRE-RESCUE: Kathy Owens, Special Projects Coordinator
This area is currently being provided fire rescue service
from Palm Beach County Fire Rescue station 51 which is
2.8 miles away. If annexed, Boynton Beach would serve
the area from its station #2, approximately 2 miles
away. As the area is contiguous to Boynton, we
anticipate few operational problems. There will be,
however, a loss of revenue to Palm Beach County Fire
Rescue.
4.
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT:
Planner
Diana Newcomer, criminal Justice
Annexation of this vacant parcel will not hinder service
levels for the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office to surrounding
unincorporated areas, nor for the City of Boynton Beach.
The Sheriff's Office does not find issue with this
request.
5. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Allan Ennis, Development Review
Engineer
Since the application for a city development order was
not complete prior to February 1, 1990 (based on our
reading of city correspondence to applicant), this
project is considered to be subject to 1990 Countywide
Traffic Performance Standards (County Ordinance 90-6 and
90-7).
Page 3 of 4
June 12, 1990
To Comply with these county Ordinances, new traffic
reports need to be submitted by the applicant to your
office as well as our office for review.
If the outparcels on each of the shopping center site
plans will be specifically limited to restaurant and
financial institution use, their trip generation should
be separately calculated at the higher rates that are
representative of these land uses rather than included
as part of the general retail commercial area.
Under test #1 of the new countywide Traffic Standard
(which is comparable to the previous unincorporated area
standard - county Ordinance 87-18), significant project
traffic would occur on two links of Boynton Beach
Boulevard that are projected to exceed their existing
and committed capacities. No improvements are recom-
mended for either of these two links (Military Trail to
EI Claire Ranch Road and Old Boynton Road to Interstate
95). without some commitment from these developers to
improve these two links the traffic standard is violated.
6. UTILITIES: Lorraine Peterson , civil Engineer,
Engineering Division
No comment - Not in WUD's Service Area
7.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DEPARTMENT:
Roberts, Assistant Director
Richard
The proposed annexation results in the loss of ad valorem
taxes of $23.00 as the above city does not participate
in Fire Rescue MSTU #3 and the Library
Taxing District. No estimate can be made as to the
dollar value of the services that are no longer provided
by the county. In addition certain revenue sources,
i.e., utility service tax, franchise fees, sales tax and
state shared revenues may be marginally reduced but
cannot be estimated from available information. There-
forer the overall fiscal impact cannot be determined.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and respond to these
actions. Please include these comments with your backup
Page 4 of 4
June 12, 1990
materials for all meetings and hearings where this annexation
is discussed. The Planning Division would appreciate it if
you could please provide this office with final annexation
ordinances so staff can adjust the County's maps accordingly.
Feel free to contact this office if you have any questions.
sincerely,
D~~~AICP
Planning Di~;~ibr
Attachment
cc: Board of County Commissioners
Bob Weisman, Administration
Lee Rosenthal, county Attorney's Office
Donna Kristaponis, planning, Zoning and Building
Bob Kraus, ERM
Kathy Owens, Fire/Rescue
Diana Newcomer, Sheriff's Department
Allan Ennis, Traffic Engineering Division
Lorraine Peterson, Water utilities
Richard Robertsr OFMB
Keith Stahley, zoning Division
Richard F. Morley, Planning Division
Anita Gonzalez, Planning Division
steve Morales, Planning Division
FILE: ANNEX2/ANNXBB.RS7
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
@
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435.0310
(407) 734-Blll
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
7 June 1990 .
Mr. Alan Ennis
Palm Beach County
Engineering Department
P.O. Box 2429
Building S-1170,PBIA
West Palm Beach, FL 33402
RE: Traffic Impact Analysis for Boynton Beach Blvd. PCD
and Knuth Road PCD
Dear Mr. Ennis:
Please be advised that the City staff found the applications for
the Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD and Knuth Road PCD to be complete
as of the submittal date of January 30, 1990. The City considers
any application which is sufficiently complete to allow process-
ing through the staff and various city boards to be a complete
application. In the case of both of the above-mentioned
applications, the items listed in the letter to the applicant,
dated February 13r 1990, were minor in nature. The only
missing item which could be possibly considered substantial in
nature were the requirements for a subdivision master plan,
however, since these sites will each be developed as a single
shopping center, the lack of subdivision plans did not constitute
a major ommission. All of the improvements which would be
required for a subdivision were shown on the conceptual site
plans for the PCD's, or would be constructed as a part of the
shopping center site.
Since the City considers the two applications to have been
complete as of the submission date, the City will continue to
process these applications, subject to the applicant demonstrating
that the roadway levels of service, as set forth in the City's
Comprehensive Plan, would be maintained, as well as applicable
levels of service in the unincorporated area. The provisions
of the City's Plan and Code Ordinances which were in effect at
the time these applications were submitted require that a
traffic impact analysis be submitted when property is rezoned,
using the methodology and standards utilized by Palm Beach County,
but subject to the levels of service set forth in the city's
Comprehensive Plan.
,.
TO:
Mr. Alan Ennis
Page Two
617 /90
If you have any questions with regard to these applications,
please feel free to contact me. The City appreciates your review
and comments regarding the traffic studies which were submitted
for these two projects. The Planning Department will recommend
that the approval of these applications be conditioned upon
maintaining the adopted levels of service within the City, as
well as the adopted levels of service in the unincorporated
area.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
~7~
Timothy P. Cannon
Interim Planning Director
TPC/cmc
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
James Cherof, City Attorney
Vincent Finizio, Engineering Dept.
~,UOI]l-'-'i!'i't o~.~~ler!"-"
7,2;Ll8b\i.,__.____,_
t'(J~t' I. UI .)
__,_GualiIY:2.!.andar"----.
"n." , .~ q '" "
j jj \<, ..J~'H I.' i..1 ,..J _I I ."1
June 6, 1990
Mr. Jim Golden,
PlanningDeparlment
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425.0310
Re: Traffic Impact Review
Knuth Road PCD
Boynton Beach Blvd PCD
Dear Mr. Golden:
.1\1; per your request, the traffic impact of the proposed rezoning of the above
referenced sites on projected 2010 traffic has been reviewed. Table 1 below indicates
the cummulative impact of rezoning the Boynon Beach Boulevard site (Residential
10.8 to Commercial) and the Knuth Road site (Residential 7.2 and Commercial to
Commercial) would increase projected traffic by approximately 6,000 trips.
Tablc 1.
Incrc,,"cd Trip Projcction B.timatc.
I
I
If!,ojeet
Current Zoning I Proposed I
New Exl
Size U nits Trips I Trip~ Difference:
KIlYlh Rd peD
77
41,380
MF DU _ ~1? I
SqftCcm ~
2,820 '
MP DU 801 I
4,818
4,818
Tctal Knuth Rd
Boynton Beach BldPCD 130
[Total Impact
! '
Scurce: Walter H. Keller Jr.~ Inc.
1,998 I
4,017 [
"
6,014
[
Exhibits A and B attached, show the individual rezonings would also increase
on roadways projected to be over capacity. The Knuth Road rezoning
impacts a,e less than 1% in all locations except for Lawrence Road.
traffic
however,
If you have any questions please contact me at (305) 732.7844.
Sincerely,
Waller H. Keller Jr., PE, A1CP
President
WHKlus
Attae,hment
RTirrI"VSD
.L"p. .
JUN 7 1990
PLAid ;,.h ~J'._i.jr.
....
III. UU!JlIiull ht'Oll" Il\oi UI
li:~"': Abalo~1,IIll~IJ~_
Illtl, oJ:,W .', t ':"JlJ 'i;)) i"M
755 3866
-----_.
Paye j uf )
Quality: Standard
f//<<Tft pp
E.hibit A. Aae.lYli. of R.ozoaiaM lKalOD RoD. 2010 Vohlmo.
I" , ,
, ,
I AddID'1 Rev I
I 2010 2010 2010' 2010 I
, Proj 2010
i RoadwllY V/C I ,
From To Cap ADT ADT ADT V/C'
I ,
i Bol'oton B..e. Bd Knut. Rd MoHRd 46,400 35.500 0.77 1.068 :36,568 I
0.79 I
Mall Rd Conareli Aven~e 46.400 35,500 0,7i 1.008 36,508 0.79 ;
COr.p;eSi Avenue Old Beynlon Rd 46.400 42,400 0.91 385 42,785 0.91
Old B"~'nton Rd 1.95 55.800 56,800 1.02 329 57.12~ 1.02 '
i CO~litressAveoue NW22ndA", Old Boynton Rd 55,800 56,J00 1.01 222 56,712 1.02 i
Old Boynton RJ Boynton Beach Bd 55.800 56.500 LOl 253 56.753 ,
1.02 i
BosntonBeaeh Blvd Woolbrillht Rd 46,400 SO. 700 1.09 , ,)49 51.\144 1.10 '
Woolbriaht Rd GolfRd 46.400 56,700 1.22 ' 203 56,90: L23
, La'weno.eRd NW22ndA", Old Boynton Rd 13.100 15,100 wi 159 15,259 Uti
Old Boynton Rd Boy~toa BeachBd 13.]00 15.100 U51 I'lli 15.296 1.ii
,
~\V22ndAve Miiitar,Tr LawrenceRd 30.llOO 13.900 OA,; ! R!', [3,980 O.-t7
So~rce: Waiter H. Keller Jr., Inc.
K.S. Ro~erl, c..'llBultin~ Enllineer, In..
&~ '
"I"j,..\
Illthiblt B. Aooly.i. of Rezocina BBJsbIn Blvd PCD on 2010 Volune.
I AddtD'1 Re" Rev
, 2010 2010 2010' Proi 2010 2010
, From To Cap ADT Y/C ADT ADT V/C
I Roadway
Boynton Beach Bd Knuth Rd MaURd 46.400 35,500 0.77 2,147 3'.M7 0,81
I MallBci C:on~e""ven~e 46.400 35,500 0.77 2027 37,527 O,bl
C:onwes, Avenue Old Boynton Rd 46.400 42,400 0.91 775 43,175 0,93
Old Boynton Rd 1.95 5S,8OO 56,SOO 1.02 M2 57,.161 i.03
, C)[!)l;t"e86 Avenue NW 22nd Ave Old Boynton Rd 55,800 56,500 1.01 446 56,946 1.02
Old Boynton RJ BoyntonBeachBd 55.800 56,500 1.01 509 57,009 1.02
BoyntonBeach Blvd Woolbrillht Rd 46,400 50,700 1.09 702 51.402 1.11
Woolbri~ht Rd OolfRd 46,400 56,700 U2 4Q9 57,109 [,23 .
: La\....~cmceRd NW220dA", Qld Boynton Rd 13.100 15,100 U5 320 IS,4~O 1.18 :
, Old Boynten Rd BoyntonBeachBd 13.100 15,100 Wi 394 IS,494 1.18 :
I r
NW 22nd Me Military Tr Lawrence Rd 30, ilOO 13,900 0.46 ; 160 14,060 0.41
I
Source: Walter H. Keller Ir,. Inc,
KS. Ro~et'I. CollBultln~ EDI!iDeer, Inc,
City or BaInton Beach Compreb.nslve Plan ."
r.....
,lU!'l I i ,;
r ,~, '
Board 01' Count" CommiuioDen
Carol J. Elmquiar. C....lrman
Karen T. Marcus. Vice Chair
Carol A. Rob.rt.
Ron Howard
Cawl. Phillip.
@"'intMlOll'K'I'''.~''
County Admlnl.trator
J.n Wlnttfl
June 5. 1990
I.)ep.rtment of Engineering
and Public Work.s
Jamlls J, Golden
SAntor City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd,
P. 0, Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33436-0310
REI TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSES FOR
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD peD AND KNUTH ROAD PCO
Dear Hr, Golden:
As requested by your letter uf Aprll 3, 1990, the Palm Beach county Traffic
Division has reviewed the traffic reports for the two proposed shopping centers
entitled Boynton Beach Buulevard peD and Knuth Road peD, The following comments
are submitted for your consideration:
1)
Based upon coples of correspondence from your office to the applicant's
agent (Kllday & Assoclates,- Inc,) dated February 13, 1990, we do D.l!1
consider the appllcations for these projects to have been complete prior
to Fllbruary 1, 1990 and therefore vested against the new Countywide Traffic
Performance Standards (County Ordinance 90-7) as per the MuniCipal
Implementation Ordinance (County Ordinance 90-6). To comply with these
County Ordinances, new traffic reports need to be submitted by the
applicant to your office as well as our office for review,
If the outparcels on each of the shopping center site plans will be
specifically limited to restaurant and financ1al institution use, their
trip generation should be separately calculated at the higher rates that
are representative of these land uses rather than included as part of the
general retail commercial area.
Z)
3)
Under Tllst il of the new Countywide Traffic Standard (wh1ch i~ comparable
to the previous unincorporated area standard - County Ordinance 87-18),
sianificant project traffic would occur on two link~ of Boynton Beach
Boulevard that are projected to QlCceed their QlChting and committed
capacities, No improvements are recommended for either of these two links
(Military Trail to El Claire Ranch Road and Old Boynton Road to Interstate
95). Without SOme commitment from these developers to improve these two
links the traffic standard i, violated.
RECEIVED
JUN 5 1990
"An Equd OppOrtunity - Mflrm.&th'. Action Employer"
BOX 242' WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33402-2429 (407) 68.~~NNING DI::PT,
-
\
,
James J. Golden
Page 2
Jun. 4, 11l1lO
Your transmittal of these traffic reportE for our review ;E appreciated. Please
do not hesitatA to contact me if you have any questions concerning these
comments.
Sincerely,
COUNTY ~INEER
~~
'lan A. Ennis, P.E., AICP
Development Review Engineer
AAE:sb
cc: Audrey Wolfe, Special Projects Coordinator. County Engineering Dept,
File: General - TPS - Municipalities. Traffic Study Reviews
Intersection: "Boynton Beach Blvd, & Knuth Road"
General. TPS . Municipalities. Vesting Determlnatlons
aae\BB&KnPCD
2851 John Street
Suite One
Markham. Ontano L3R SR7
(416) 477.9200 Facsimile' (416) 477-7390
NORTH AMERICAN ACQUISITIONS CORP.
May 28, 1990
Mr. James J. Golden
Senior City Planner
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310 . .
BOY~"TONBEACH, Fiuriua
33425-0310
U.SA
Dear Mr. Golden:
RE: LAND USE AND ZONING CHANGE
WINCHESTER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD.
KNUTH ROAD PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
MICHAELA. SCHROEDER, TRUSTEE
BOYNTONBEACHBOULEVARDP~DCOMMERCIAL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This letter is to express our concern with regard to the above-noted
applications.
North American are the owners of the Boynton Plaza located at the southwest
corner of Boynton Beach Blvd. and Congress Ave. These applications
proposing large retail developments could have detrimental impacts on the
viability of Boynton Plaza and its tenants,
It would be appreciated if the City of Boynton
us informed of any future public hearings,
these applicatioru..
Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated,
Yours truly,
Beach could continue to keep
etc. and the progression of
~~I ~E~~~t~ .
IJ Planning & Research
SKB*pb
RECE1VIID
"1_
PLANNING DEPT.
- .-
--,. -.
,.
Mr. Dennis R. Foltz
- 2 -
April 16, 1990
Please provide our office with your comments prior to the
scheduled public hearing dates.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
~ 1- ~~L
o /
JAMES J. GOLDEN
senior City Planner
JJG:cp
cc: Interim Planning Director
Central File
Encls.
~
CITY 0 f
BOYNTON BEACH
@
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435.0310
(407) 734,8111
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
April 3, 1990
Walter H. Keller, Jr., Inc.
Attn: Mr. Walter Keller
PO Box 9740
Coral Springs, Fl 33075-9740
RE: Traffic Impact Analysis for Two Shopping Centers proposed on
the South Side of Boynton Beach Boulevard West of Congress
Avenue
Dear Walt:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the traffic impact analysis and
master plan for the following annexation, land use element and
rezonings to Planned commercial Development (PCD):
1. Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD
2. Knuth Road PCD
please review the above for consistency with the Levels of
Service and criteria contained within the city of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan Traffic Circulation Element and Section
9.c.4.h(5) of the city's Zoning Regulations and provide our
office with your comments by no later than May 11, 1990. Include
in your analysis any recommendations for right-of-way dedication,
turn lane improvements, signalization, etc., that would be
necessary pursuant to Comprehensive policies or Palm Beach
County/FDOT policies or standards.
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
JJG:frb
Encs
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
t--t.. ML
JAMES . GOLDEN
Senior City Planner
A:WKeller
cc: City Manager
central File
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
~
~
OFFICE
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach. Florida 33435-0310
14071734-8111
OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
.
April 3, 1990
Palm Beach County Engineering Dept.
Attn: Mr. Charles Walker
PO Box 2429
West Palm Beach, Fl 33401
RE: Traffic Impact Analysis For Two Shopping Centers Proposed on
The South Side of Boynton Beach Boulevard West of congress
Avenue
Dear Mr. Walker:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the traffic impact analysis and
master plan for the following annexation, land use element amend-
ment and rezoning requests to Planned Commercial Development
(PCD) :
1. Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD
2. Knuth Road PCD
These projects were submitted to the City on January 30, 1990 and
are being reviewed by the City's traffic consultant for consis-
tency with the Traffic Circulation Element of the City of Boynton
Comprehensive Plan.
Please forward any comments that you may have by May 31, 1990 for
incorporation in the June public hearing proceedings.
Very truly yours,
C~OFf~O);e.,~EACH
JAMES . GOLDEN
Senior City planner
JJG:frb
Enc
cc: Timothy Cannon
A:CWalker
Geotechnical & Construction Materials
Hydrogeology & Monitoring Wells
Engineering. Inspection. Testing
March 28, 1990
Michael Schroeder
One Boca Place
Suite 319 Atrium
2255 Glades Rd.
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Re: Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD
Boynton Beach Blvd. West of US Post Office
Boynton Beach, FL
Gentlemen:
Per request of Chuck Yannette of Kilday & Associates, Nutting Engineers of Florida, Inc. has
performed geotechnical engineering services for the referenced project, namely a site inspection and
review of the soils map. The results of our evaluation are presented hereafter.
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
The referenced site is located south of Boynton Beach Boulevard approximately 950' from Knuth
Road in Boynton Beach. Florida. Banyan Creek Estates is located immediately west and south of the
site and the US Post Office immediately east of the site in the north half. A Palm Beach County
School is located immediately southeast of the site. The site is approximately 14.8 acres and has
dimensions of the order of 655' in the east-west direction by 964' in the north-south direction. Due
to inaccessibility to the site. our inspection was made from adjacent properties looking into the site.
The grades at the site generally appear to be a couple of feet lower than adjacent property along the
west side and several feet lower along the east side adjacent to the Post Office. Most of the site is
heavily wooded with what appear to be Brazilian pepper trees with the eastern half, northern two
thirds appearing as a marsh with many cattails observed.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The United States Department of Agricultural Soil Conservation Service Soils Map for Palm Beach
County indicates the presence of the Okeelanta muck within the eastern one-half of the site. Our
experience is that this particular deposit can pertain to depths of 15' below the level of Boynton
Beach Boulevard. The soils map indicates Basinger sand within the northern two-thirds of the
western one-half of the site and Basinger/Myakka depressional soils within the southern one-third,
western one-half of the site.
The Basinger sand consists of nearly level, sandy soils formed in thick beds of sandy marine
sediments. The sand colors range from white to dark reddish brown to pale brown and the sand is
typically fine. Permeability is typically rapid.
The Basinger/Myakka depressional sands are nearly level, poorly drained. sandy soils in shallow
depressions. Thin shallow organic zones are sometimes associated with this soil series.
Groundwater levels are anticipated to be 4' to 5' below existing grades and may be somewhat lower
during the current drought. A water level is apparent within the marsh in the northern two-thirds
of the eastern half.
1310 NEPTUNE DRIVE. BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33426
Boynton Beach (407) 736-4900 . Pompano Besch (305) 941.8700 . FAX (407) 737-9975
A.....
,
-.
CONCLUSIONS
The referenced site can be developed for the intended use. However, a considerable amount of
earthwork will be required in demucking the site and rebuilding structural fills within the eastern
half of the site. The northern two-thirds of the western half can probably be developed with
conventional construction techniques, that is within the Basinger fine sand area. There is potential
for some shallow buried organic deposits within the Basinger/Myakka depressional series in the south
one-third of the western half. In any case prior to proceeding with construction at this site a
geotechnical investigation including an appropriate number of standard penetration test borings must
be completed in order to assess the subsurface conditions and develop appropriate criteria for support
of foundations and parking areas.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service and would look forward to working with you and
your consultants during the geotechnical investigation and construction phases. Should you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Sincerely,
NUTIING ENGINEERS OF FLORIDA, INC.
Ja ~g~~
~12"f':fK~ation #21083
Vice President/Chief Engineer
Attachments:
Limitations of Liability
cc: Kilday & Associates
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100 A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
BBBL VD/pm
@NUTTING
~~ ENGINEERS
OF FLORIDA. INC.
ESTABLISHED 1967
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
TO:
Tim Cannon
DATE
March 9, 1990
DEPARTMENT
Planning Director
EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION
[2(
o
o
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
APPROPRIATE ACTION
o
o
o
NOTE AND RETURN
FOR YOUR FILES
OTHER
ACTION DESIRED PRIOR TO
SUBJECT: Six Annexation Applications submitted by Kilday & Associates
As you are aware the City Commission at Tuesday evenings Commission Meeting
relative to the Agenda item of six applications submitted by Kilday and
Associates for annexation, land use element and rezoning took the following
action:
1. Recommended to continue the processing of the six applications and
,directed staff to process accordingly,
2. Recommended that the three sites under the three acre rule be processed
accordingly as if they were in fact three acres or more.
Both of these recommending actions by the City Commission are to occur
simultaneously, therefore, I ask that your department move forward in an
expeditious manner on these applications. Your prompt attention is
appreciated.
.:::- 2SM5\ ~
J I Scott Miller
City Manager
JSM : j C
RESPONSE:
TO: J Scott Miller
The above information has been forwarded to the applicant.
RE.r"E< T~ TTID.
\..., J_~. " "u.,
Date (Action Completed) /2}/;;; /?/;.
! '
/
. t =7-:'-:->:/
S~gna ure"7"/'u,.
/ I
MAR 9 1990
/-?;7 P1pNNII~G DEfT,
/.. /~....:,--/!, "~.(~1,, .
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
~
\ill
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435.0310
(407) 734-BIlI
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
March 5, 1990
Kilday & Associates
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
1551 Forum Place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
RE: Boynton Beach Annexations
Dear Mr. Kilday:
The planning Department has reviewed your letter of February 13,
1990 and the additional items submitted. Our comments are as
follows:
General Issues
1. The proposed .80 acre service station is currently a portion
of a 25.3 acre parcel which is proposed to be annexed as
part of the Mall South application. Therefore, this parcel
can be zoned PCD and it is not intended in the comprehensive
Plan that the .80 acre parcel be removed from the 25.3 acre
parcel. Concerning the proposed Mall Corner Restaurant and
Retail/Oil Lube applications, these two parcelS do not meet
the minimum acreage requirements for rezoning to PCD.
However, it is the intent of the Comprehensive Plan that the
above parcels be combined as part of a unified development,
rather than developed on a piecemeal basis. Because these
parcels fall, within Planning Area 7 of the Future Land Use
Element support Documents, any rezoning to other than the
PCD zoning district would be inconsistent with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan. As noted by the Interim planning
Director, the word "should" as opposed to "shall" has no
bearing on this matter as far as DCA is concerned. In order
to place these three parcels in the C-3 zoning category, an
application for a text amendment will be required. Only one
application would be necessary to amend the text lanaguage
for Planning Area 7 to cover all of the parcels which lie
within this area.
TO: Kilday & Associates
-2-
Mar. 5, 1990
2. The DRI issue is scheduled to be reviewed by the City
Commission at the March 6, 1990 meeting.
3. As documented in the description for each application in the
February 13, 1990 correspondence, staff is aware of the
ownership issues. Concerning the proposed Mall South Parcel
(49.52 acres), this parcel is being placed in a commercial
land use and zoning category and the analysis of impacts on
infrastructure are required pursuant to the City of Boynton
Beach Zoning Regulations (Section 9.c.4). In addition, this
information will also be required by DCA, as outlined in the
last paragraph of the February 13th correspondence.
Concerning the status of the six applications, the following
items noted in the February 13, 1990 correspondence are still
outstanding:
I. Proposed Service Station
Item no. 1.
II. Proposed Mall South Parcels
Items no. 1, 3 and 5. Concerning item no. 3, the signed
original that was submitted does not include Ernest Klatt's
signature. The photocopy of only Ernest Klatt's signature
on page 7 is not acceptable. The original page 7 of the
application should be removed, signed by Ernest Klaff and
returned, or a new fully signed original of page 7 should be
submitted.
III. Proposed Mall Corner Restaurant
Items no. 1 and 4. The signature of the applicant is still
missing from page 6 and the original signed copy should be
modified accordingly.
IV. Proposed Retail/Oil Lube
Item no. 1.
V. Knuth Road PCD
Items no. 4, 5 and 8. Concerning item no. 4, an original
signed copy is necessary.
VI. Boynton Beach Boulevard PCD
Items no. 4 and 7.
The above items should be submitted in two copies for standard
zoning districts and 3 copies for planned zoning districts. six
additional copies of the subdivision master plan for the
rezonings to PCD will be required for review by the Technical
Review Board (9 total).
TO: Kilday & Associates
-3-
Mar. 5, 1990
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNTOf BEACH
~ I )>~~
JAMES J. GOLDEN
Senior City Planner
JJG: frb
cc: City Manger
Central File
KildayII
;.
'iI /'
Kilday & Associates
Landscape Architects/Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite l00A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(4071 689-5522 . Fax: 1407) 689-2592
February 26, 1990
Mr. James J. Golden
Senior City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
RE: Boynton Beach ^nne~aticn Parcels
Dear 11ra Golden,
This letter provides a response to your letter of February
13, 1990 concerning six Annexation, Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, and Rezoning applications which were submitted to
you on January 31, 1990. Prior to discussing the individual
parcels involved, there are several general issues which need
resolution. These are:
,
L
Text Amendment - As indicated in my previous letter to
you of January 31, 1990 (Item No.2 - Proposed Service
sta t ion), I do not be I i eve a Text Amendment is necessary
regarding those three parcels which are less than three
acres in size and therefore not eligible for
consideration as Planned Commercial Districts. As
indicated then, the critical language in the
Comprehensive Plan is the word "should" as opposed to
the word "shall". ~ Obviously, these three parcels of
land which do not Ineet the minimum three acres criteria
for a Planned Commercial Distx"ict cannot, in fact. be
zoned as Planned Commel'ciaI Districts. We have reviewed
the Ordinance and filld no provisions for any waiver from
this requi rement. Because of this, we have. (Kade
appl ication for straight C-3 zoning. However, as y.ou are
well aware, the City Cornll.ission may place conditions
lJpOll aTIY Annexation approval similar in nature to
conditions which could be placed upon an actual Planned
COlumercial District. Because there seems to be some
UTlcertainty regarding the interpretation of this section
of the Conlprellensive Plan. l would therefore request
that this matter be discussed by the Ci ty Comm.ir\s,j"on as
to their i.ntent in including this lanr,ua.ge i.n t~eEIVED
MAn' 1 19~O
PLANNING DLPf.
.'
Mr. James J.
February 26.
Page 2
Golden
1990
2. Development of Regional Impact - Your Letter of February
13, 1990 indicates that these applications when
considered ~either separately or together may constitute
a Development of Regional Impact". I need further
clarification of this issue. I have reviewed the
Statutes and do not find any indication that Development
of Regional Impacts must requeSted at this time. I
agree with you that the City Commission should probably
make a final decision regarding this item. Perhaps we
can schedule the Text Amendment and the DRI issue on the
same agenda and resolve these matters together.
3. Ownership - My letter of January 31, 1990 was incorrect
in one critical assumption. At that time, 1 indicated
that Mr. Winchester had some involvement in all of the
parcels being submitted. Subsequently, I learned that
that is not the case. For your information, I am
attaching Warranty Deeds indicating the ownership of
each of the parcels being submitted. Specifically, Mr.
Winchester has no involvement in either the Mall Corner
parcel which was purchased in 1988 from the Florida Gas
Transmission Company or the University of Florida Trust
parcel which has been owned by the Trust since 1986.
Additionally. [ am attaching a map showing the names of
the ownerships of the various parcels between Old
Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard. You will note
tha't these parcels were purchased at various times and
in various combinations of names. For the purpose of
this Annexation~ we have gathered these parcels
together. But again, there is no development plan being
requested at this time and we will further stipulate
that no development wiLl take place on the 49 acre tract
until an actual Planned Commercial District is requested
by the peli lianeI'. (However, in the meantime. we are
requesting a Commercial Land Use designation and Zoning
District be applied to this property in order to be
consistent with both the City and County Plans.)
Regarding
f 0 1 low i n g
your specific concerns
respoTlse is provided:
for each appl icati.on .the
I. Erop~?_~_L~_~~~i~,g___~.iQJ~_L9}.! This. 80 acres of property is
located at tile southwest corner of North Congress Avenue
and Old Boynton Road and is owned by Bil I Ray Winchester
and Elsie A. Wi,rlchester. Applications submj_tted are for
Annexation, lJand Use Element Alnendment~ and Rezoning.
L
Applicant
necessary.
disagrees
As sta.ted
that a Text Amendment is
above, ttle applicant re~ue5t5
..
Mr. James oJ.
February 26.
Page 3
Golden
1990
that this ma-r~ tet' bl~ discussed at the City
Commission level.
2. Additional copies of thf.:!' property owners list, tax
map and affidavit are attached.
3.
Items 6 and
this site
However, we
Consulting
by you in
attached.
7 of the application do not apply to
as the parcel is less than one acre.
did submit a statement by K.S. Rogers,
Enftineer, providing the data requested
your Jetter. An additional copy is
I I. e.!:..9...EOS~E.-.t12_LL--?OL!.!J!_.J)ar~~_L - This /~9.52 acre parcel is
located on the east and west sides of Winchester Park
Boulevard between Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach
Boulevard and is owned by 8i II R. Winchester. Elsie A.
Winchester. and Ernest Klatt. The applications are for
Annexation, Land Use Element Amendment, and Rezoning.
1. A Text Amendment is not needed as the applicant has
already agreed 1:0 stipulate in the Annexation
agreement that no development will commence prior
to a Rezoning of the property to a Planned
Commercial District designation. However, the
applicant is requesting C-3 Zoning at this time to
ensure that the property is entitled to develop
consistent witl) botll the County and the City Land
Use Plans. "rt,e stipulation regarding no
developmcn'l until a Planned Commercial District is
approved for this site is sufficicn't to satisfy the
Text requireulcnts of the Plan.
2.
Additional copies
maps ar\d affidavit
of the property
ar-e attached.
owners
list,
tax
3.
The Consent of Ernest Klatt was
of the appli.cation. HO\.Jever,
has been attached tlereto.
submit.ted as
an addi tiana-{
p;ut
copy
4. Pursuant to our discussion with tile City Forester,
a vegetative aS5cssrnent will be sufficient at this
time. Such an assessment is attached tlereto.
s. it.pms (a). (b)~ and (c) ,,,ere included in the
application as ")1al South Justification Impacts".
This docunlsnt al~~o addressed Itcul Cd) rega~ding
traffic. BeCnlJS~ there a,re no dcveloplnent plans
for the property at this time and because the
.'
Mr. James J.
February 26,
Page 4
Golden
1990
applicant has further stipulated that no
development will take place prior to the approval
for a Planned Commercial District and/or
Development of Regional Impact (if applicable), a
traffic comparison cannot be entertained at this
time. Similarly. Items (e) and (fl regarding
sewage flow cannot be calculated wilh6ut a known
use for the site. Again, a" 'specific development
plan will be required in order to assess future
amp I oymen t...
Ill. Prop..9s~~ M'!J_LCo_rner_.B.S'.s_to.~l!]'a_nJ:. - This 1.31, acre parcel
is located at the southwest corner of Old Boynton Road
and Winchester Park Boulevard and is owned by Hall
Carner, Inc.. Appl ications are for Annexation, Land Use
Element Amendment. and Rezoning.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Applicant
necessary..
that this
Commission
that a Text Amendment is
above. the appl icant requests
discussed at the City
di5agrec~s
As stated
matter be
I eve].
Information contained in the
by this office from our
duplicated on a standard
attached.
application
computer
City form
submitted
has been
which is
Additional copies of the property owners
map and affidavit are attached.
list, tax
Signature of the applicant on Page 6
submitted. However. an additional
attached hert~in~
was previously
copy has been
The proposed
i nd i eel 'l:c~d on
app I i CD. t i on ~
be noted on
at taclwd.
square footage for the restaurant was
the site plan sllblnitted as part of the
'fIle square footage has additionally
the revised "Requirements (e) and (h)"
,
6. It is estilnated that tt~c rQsta~rant will provide
approxilna-tely 50 elnploymenl. opportunities.. In all
probabi.lity, ther(~ \o/ill be:! 25-.30 employees working
on anyone shift. ~lowcver. while hours of
operation have not been fully defined, it is
estimated ttlat at 'east two shifts will be required
for the restaura,nt~ This matter has been
incorporated under the revised "Requirements (g)
and (h) ,. of the appl ieation~
Mr. James J.
February 26.
Page 5
Golden
1990
IV. Proposed Retail/Oil L,ub<:>. This 2.[,4 acre site is
located at the northeast corner of West Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Winchester Park Boulevard and is owned by
Winchester, Winchester1 Zeiher, and Schroeder, a Florida
General Partnership. ^pplications are for Annexation,
Land Use Element ^Inendnlent~ and Rezoning.
1.
Applicant
necessary.
that this
Commission
disagrees
As stated
matter be
I eve I.
that a Text Amendment is
above, the applicant requests
discussed at the City
2.
Additi.onal copies
map and affidavit
of the property
are attached-
ownerS
list,
tax
3. Tl1e term COllllnercial-3 has been amended to "C-3ff.
4. Additional information pertaining to proposed
square footage has been added to the revised
"Requirements (g) and (h) which is attached.
5. Additional information pertaining to employment
figures for the project has been added to the
revised "Requirements Cg) and (h) which is
attached.
v. Propos~~nui;.~B...9~~~~!~-"J},l~g~_<;:_q~}!lercia I _pevelomnent-
This 13.8"11 acre parcel is at the southwest corner of
West Boynton Beach Boulevard and Knuth Road and is owned
by the Wincllester Fanlily Partnership, Ltd. and various
members of the Winchester family. Applications are for
AnnexatioTl. Land Use Element Amendment~ and Rezoning.
1. An additional '100.00 filing fee is attached.
2. A Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment application is
attached. PreviouslY1 the applicant was under the
impression that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
application which w~s submitted as part ~f "the
overull Anrtexation. COlnprel1ensive I~lan and Rezoning
application was sufficient to indicate that change
on the Pla.n. HO\,Jover. based upon your letter, we
are in agreement that a separate "ext Amendment
will be required.
3.
Additional copies of the property owners
maps and affidavit are attached.
List. tax
'1.
Tile
sig1\"i:ur~" of
tho
applicanL on Page G.'of the
Hr. James J. Golden
February 2t3. 1990
Page 6
Annexation application has
attached.
been
completed and is
5. As with the other applications, the applicant did
indicate the proposed square footage on the
previously submitted site plans. However. these
figures have additionally been added to the
attached revised "Requirements' (g) and (h)ff.
6. Employment calculations have been included in the
attached revised "Requirements (g) and (h)".
7. Documentation submitted by the applicant indicates
that the property is under single ownership and is
currently subject to Unified Control. Attached
herein you \"i I t find an additional document
indicating the willingness of this awner to
maintain Unified Control pursuant to the
requirements of the City of Boynton Beach in the
future and require any future owners to likewise
agree..
V I . P T'..9_E..9..2Q.~_.~_9-Y..!'_ t ~D~ e_?~J::L_1?9_~-!..L~~1?.:..~.9----E-U.~.~.DAne d Gomm ere i a I
.Qeve~~Rn:t_Q...1JL- Thi.s 14.76 acre parcei is located on the
south side of West Boynton Beach Boulevard and is owned
by the University of Florida Foundation,. Inc.. Charlene
Boynton, and Donald Lowe. ApplicatIons are for
Annexation. Land Use Element Anlendment. and Rezoning..
1. An additional $100.00 filing fee is attached.
2..
^ Comprehensive
attached.
Plan "rext Amendment application is
3.
Additional copies of tile property owners
maps and affidavit are attached.
1 ist, tax
4.
Pursuant: to
a vegetative
1~he J8.nuary
survt'':'Y which
our discussion with the City Forester,
assessment was submi.tted as part of
3.1. 1~190 appl ication in lieu of:a tree
\"1 II br-~ submi tted at. a later da"te..
(g J
been
and
included
(hJ which
in
is
,.
C>.
Th~ proposed
the rnvised
a.ttached..
~;qUD,rp. footage
"Requirements
has
6.
Employment calculations
revised "Requil"ements
attached.
have
(g J
been
and
added to the
(hl which is
" .
Mr. .Ja.IRes J ~
February 26,
Page 7
Golden
1990
7. Documentation submitted by the applicant indicates
that the property is under single ownership and is
currently subject to Unified Control. Attached
herein you will find an additional document
indicating the willingness of this owner to
maintain Unified Control pursuant to the
requirements of the City of. ,Boynton Beach in the
future and require any future owners to likewise
agree.
8. Page 7 of the Land Use Element Amendm~nt/Rezoning
application has been completed and is attached.
If you have any questions concerning any of the above, please
do not hesitate to contact me.
Since("ely~
.,
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
@""
l',~"
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach. Florida 33435.0310
(4071734.8111
I I
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
February 13, 1990
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
Attn: Kieran J. Kilday
1551 Forum place, Bldg. 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Dear Mr. Kilday:
. ,
. \
Please be advised that the planning Department
six applications submitted on January 31, 1990.
as follows:
has reviewed the
Our comments are
I. proposed Service station (.80 acres) at southwest corner of
North Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road owned by Bill
Ray Winchester and Elsie A. Winchester (applications for
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete'
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since the proposed zoning category does not comply wtt~
the text language for planning Area 7 of the Future
Land Use Element Support Documents, an application for
a comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocoPY acceptable) and affidavit.
(3) The water/sewer impact statement required pursuant to
items 6 and 7 on pages 4 and 5 is based on comparison
of existing and proposed zoning categories and not .
existing and proposed land use categories. The
statement also does not indicate that calculations are
based on the standards adopted by the Palm Beach
County Health Department.
TO: Kilday & Assoc
-2-
Feb. 13, 1990
II. proposed Mall South Parcels (49.52 acres total) located on
the east and west sides of Winchester Park Boulevard
between Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard, owned
by Bill R. Winchester, Elsie A. Winchester, and Ernest
Klatt (applications for annexation, land use element
amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since the proposed zoning category does not comply with
the text language for Planning Area 7.f of the Future
Land Use Element support Documents, an application for
a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
( 2) An additional copy of the property owners I list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
(3) Pursuant to item c(l) on page 3 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, written consent to the
processing of this application from Ernest Klatt.
, \ ,
(4) Pursuant to item d(3) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, a tree survey which
meets the requirements of the City of Boynton Beach
Tree Preservation Ordinance.
(5) Pursuant to item h on pages 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Land
Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application, a compari-
son of the impacts that would be created by develop-
ment under the proposed zoning with the impacts that
would be created by development under the existing
zoning, which shall include:
(a) A comparison of the potential square footage or
number and type of dwelling units under the existing
zoning with that which would be allowed under th~
proposed zoning or development.
(b) A statement of the uses that would be allowed in
the proposed zoning or development, and any particular
uses that would be excluded.
(c) Proposed timing and phasing of the development.
(d) A comparison of traffic which would be generated
under the proposed zoning or development, with' the
traffic that would be generated under the current
zoning; also, an analysis of traffic movements at the
intersections of driveways that would serve the
property and surrounding roadways, and improvements I I
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-3-
Feb. 13, 1990
that would be necessary to accommodate such traffic
movements. For proposed developments which would
generate three-thousand (3,000) vehicle trips per day
or more, or two-hundred fifty (250) or more
single-directional vehicle trips within a one (1) hour
period, a traffic impact analysis shall be required.
Said traffic impact analysis shall include projected
trip generation for the development, for all major
roadways and intersections within one and one-half
(1.5) miles of the subject parcel, as well as traffic
that would utilize local streets through residential
zoning districts. Said traffic impact analysis shall
compare traffic levels between the existing zoning and
the proposed zoning or development of the subject
parcel, and shall take into consideration all
development that would be possible under the current
zoning within the City, adjacent cities, and within the
unincorporated area of Palm Beach County within. a
radius of five (5) miles. For those parcels lying in
the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County, which are,
not currently zoned for urban land uses, the potential' ,
land uses according to the Palm Beach County
comprehensive plan shall be used. Where said parcels
are shown on the Palm Beach County comprehensive plan
under residential land use categories, the midpoint of
the density range shown on the County comprehensive
plan shall be used. Where a county-wide study of
traffic generation at build-out has been adopted or is
utilized by Palm Beach County, the levels of traffic
that are projected by said study shall in all cases be
used to project background traffic in the traffic
impact analysis submitted by the applicant. The format
and standards used in the traffic impact analysis shall
be the same as those which are required by Palm Beach
county, with the exception of the requirements list,ed
above. Such traffic impact analysis shall include
recommendations for the mitigation of traffic impacts,
consistent with the standards which have been adopted
by or are utilized by Palm Beach county.
(e) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
of the water demand for development under the proposed
zoning or development with water demand under the
existing zoning. Water demand shall be estimated using
the standards adopted by the Palm Beach County Health
Department for estimating such demand, unless different
standards are justified by a registered engineer.
commitment to the provision of improvements to the
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-4-
Feb. 14, 1990
water system shall also be included, where existing
facilities would be inadequate to serve development
under the proposed zoning.
(f) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
of sewage flows that would be generated under the
proposed zoning or development with that which would be
generated under the existing zoning. Sewage flows
shall be estimated using the standards adopted by the
Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such
flows, unless different standards are justified by a
registered engineer. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the sewage collection system shall also
be included, where the existing facilities would be
inadequate to serve development under the proposed
zoning.
(g) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
of sewage flows that would be generated under the "
proposed zoning or development with that which would be
generated under the existing zoning. Sewage flows' \ ,
shall be estimated using the standards adopted by the
Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such
flows, unless different standards are justified by a
registered engineer. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the sewage collection system shall also
be included, where the existing facilities would be
inadequate to serve development under the proposed
zoning.
(h) For proposed residential developments larger than
one (1) lacre, a comparison of the projected population
under the proposed zoning or development with the
projected population under the existing zoning.
population projections according to age groups for the
proposed development shall be required, where more tha~
fifty (50) dwellings, or 50 sleeping rooms in the case
of group housing, would be allowed under the proposed
zoning. Applications for rezoning to commercial or
industrial zoning districts which exceed one (1) acre
in area shall also provide projections for the number
of employees.
I I
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-5-
Feb. 14, 1990
III. Proposed Mall Corner Restaurant (1.34 acres) at the
southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Winchester Park
Boulevard owned by Mall Corner, Inc. (applications for
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since the proposed zoning category does not comply with
the text language for Planning Area 7.f of the Future
Land Use Element Documents, an application for a
Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) A standard City of Boynton Beach application form for
the Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application
(the reproduction submitted is not acceptable).
(3) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocoPY acceptable) and affidavit.
(4) Signature of applicant (owner) on page 6 of the
Annexation Application.
(5) Pursuant to item hIll on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning.
(6) Pursuant to item h(B) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
IV. Proposed Retail/Oil Lube (2.44 acres) at the northeast
corner of West Boynton Beach Boulevard and Winchester Park
Boulevard owned by Winchester, Winchester, Zeiher and
Schroeder, a Florida General partnership (applications fo~
annexation, land use element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) Since a portion of the proposed zoning category does
not comply with the text language for planning Area 7.f
of the Future Land Use Element Support Documents, an
application for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
(2) An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocoPY acceptable) and affidavit.
,
, ,
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-6-
Feb. 13, 1990
(3) Correct "Proposed Zoning" on page 3 of Annexation
application, as a County land use category has been
indicated instead of the proposed City zoning category.
I
(4) Pursuant to item hIll on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning.
(5) Pursuant to item h(8) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
V. Proposed Knuth Road Planned Commercial Development (13.871
acres) at the southwest corner of West Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Knuth Road owned by the Winchester Family
Partnership, Ltd. (applications for annexation, land use
element amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1) The correct fee for rezoning to PCD is $1,000 pursuant
to the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Fee
Schedule {a check in the amount of $900 was submitted).
(2)
since a portion of the proposed land use and zoning
categories does not comply with the text language for
Planning Area 7.j of the Future Land Use Element
support Documents, an application for a Comprehensive
Plan Text Amendment.
(3 )
An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
signature of applicant is missing from page 6 of ,
Annexation Application (copy of owner's authorization
signed by Bill R. Winchester).
A tree survey which conforms to the requirements of the
City of Boynton Beach Tree preservation Ordinance (see
section 7.5 - 6.1(b) of Article I of the Environmental
Regulations) .
Pursuant to item hIll on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning (total for entire PCD).
(4 )
( 5)
( 6)
.
, ,
,
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-7-
Feb. 13, 1990
(7) pursuant1to item h(8) of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
(8) Pursuant to item h(11) on page 7 of the Land Use
Element Amendment/Rezoning application, conformance
with the requirements for Unified Control outlined in
Section 6.F.3 of Appendix A-Zoning and submittal of a
subdivision master plan pursuant to Article VIII,
Section 4 of Appendix C-Subdivisions, Platting.
VI. Proposed Boynton Beach Boulevard Planned Conmmercial
Development (14.76 acres) on the south side of West Boynton
Beach Boulevard owned by University of Florida Foundation,
Inc. (applications for annexation, land use element
amendment and rezoning).
The following items must be submitted in order to complete
the above-referenced applications:
(1)
( 2)
(3 )
( 4)
( 5)
The correct fee for rezoning to PCD is $1,000 pursuant,
to the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Fee
Schedule (a check in the amount of $900 was sUbmitted).
\ .
Since the proposed land use and zoning category does
not comply with the text language for planning Area 7.k
of the Future Land Use Element support Documents, an
application for a comprehensive Plan Text Amendment.
An additional copy of the property owners' list, tax
maps (photocopy acceptable) and affidavit.
A tree survey which conforms to the requirements of the
City of Boynton Beach Tree Preservation Ordinance (see
section 7.5 - 6.1 (b) of Article I of the Environmental
Regulations.
L ,
Pursuant to item h(l) on page 4 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, the potential square
footage which would be allowed under the proposed
zoning (total for entire PCD).
(6) Pursuant to item h(8) on page 6 of the Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning application, projections for the
number of employees.
(7) Pursuant to item h(11) on page 7 of the Land Use
Element Amendment/Rezoning application, conformance
with the requirements for Unified Control outlined in
TO: Kilday & Assoc.
-8-
Feb. 13, 1990
Section 6.F.3 of Appendix A-Zoning and submittal of a
subdivision master plan pursuant to Article VIII,
Section 4 of Appendix C-Subdivisions, Platting.
(8) Signature of Owner/Trustee is missing from page 7 of
the Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning application.
Pursuant to Chapter 163.3187 F.S., none of the applications
submitted meet the criteria for small scale development
activities as a result of the text amendments that are necessary
and the fact that an amendment cannot involve the same property
more than once a year or the same owner's property within 200
feet of property granted a change within a period of 12 months.
It appears likely that several of these applications, either
separately or when considered together, may constitute a
Development of Regional Impact (DRI). Therefore, a description
of the petitions, a map showing same, and a tabulation of the
acreages will be forwarded to the City Commission. The
Commission will need to decide whether a binding letter should 'be
requested from DCA regarding DRI status.
If the City Commission approves the transmittal of these
applications to DCA, you will be required to submit to the
Planning Department, prior to transmittal, a description of the
availability of and demand on public facilities pursuant to
9J-ll.006(1)(b)4 of the Florida Administrative Code.
If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
CITY OF BOYNT~N ~~ACH
~'/~'~
JAMES J. GOLDEN
Senior City Planner
JJG:frb
cc: City Manager
Central File
bcc: Alan ~hhi~. PBCty Traffic Dept
Kilday
,
, .
I I
:J -+-/1 _~ (c' e (
"
Kilday & Aaaociat..
Landscape Architectsl Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 . Fax: 1407) 689-2592
;1.t:'. ~TL:1 Golden, SeniIJ:_' City Planner
City of Boynton 8('aC:1
120 E. EC1"nten '3eacL 1!oul",vard
DATE
Jnnuarv 31, 1990
PROJECT NAME 799. subnitta1s
ATT
PROJECT NU~BER
WE TRANSMIT:
Q ~EREWITH
o UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA
THE FOllOWING
o PRINTS 0 SPECIFICATIONS 0 AooeN~UU
DTRAc,NGS,SEP,As 0 SUBt.tITTALS 0 CHANGE ORDER
D SHOP DRAWINGS Dcopy OF LETTER 0
THIS IS TRANSMITTED TO YOU:
ACTION CODE:
G FOR APPROVAL 0 FOR REVIEW & COt.At.tENT
D FOR YOUR USE D AS REQUESTED
A REVIEWED
B. NOT REVIEWED
C. REvIEweo & NOTED
o RESUBMIT
E 00 NOT RESUBMIT
F RESUBMIT FOR FilES
NO OF DATE DRAWING DESCRIPTION/REMARKS ACTION
COPIES OR ITEM NO COOE
\L!-... ~~c:'r_<!:: ,. :>..:{CLL - :~;-I nf::-: _~ t ion Land Use
.. . ., ,
'''L.t '.~()ninq
.. . '.' <CA€ELi.~l sr.::::\' rei" rJl?,T~OiJ - l\nnexation , Land ,
CS~? ~c1 ~-::on i i tCj
'J . '\LL cr'n~;r:~ ( :u;;~~!~-' 7'~Lr: ~,\:, r~, ) - ]\nncx:ttion , L.'lnd
~~: ~ C' J :ld :_~()r,in~~'
.. ~J)p()sr [' ~~[:'r:Il.IL7C'Il"/ r.Jcel.'- l.\~.lnoxa. t.ir:n, ' .
. ..J~.lnu
L:>C' :~ nLt 20:1 inrr
" CY~!': :-:1\ l_i.?\CI DL\:Dl~~.::"''T1I RI:'-M!Um::i1ticn ,
L~i r~d Use ar:d :~onin(T
I: . ; \ I'I.r::I~Flr-..."',;, OF PL;:,. . TF:u~~r.l.' Pi\ECJ:L - .l~nne::Cl.tjon
:.Ji:::'J'd Use i1nd ~(")nig'J
LJ :(' I.Tll LY :
.~
:)r.'~'-L-. ;
- -,
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED. KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCI
COPIES TO
WITH ENCLOSURE
D
D
o
o
o
FilE CODE
SHOP DRAWING DIY.
SIGNEO
--
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC,
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(407) 964-7300
(FAX) 969-9717
January 31, 1990
Mr. Lindsey Walters
Kilday & Associates
1551 Forum Way
Building lOOA
West Palm Beach, FL 33402
"
RE: Boyn ton Beach Boul evard PCD
Water Useage
Dear Lindsey:
At y6ur request, this office has projected the water and sewer
demand for the above project, The Palm Beach County Health
Department has developed water useaqe standards for different
land uses. For general retail uses which do not include restau-
rants, a flow rate of 0.1 qallons per day per square foot of
floor area has been established, As the exact useaqe of this
center has not been established. only..estimates, based upon a
reasonable guess of the amount of restaurant use, can be made,
An average daily water useaqe of 28,650 qallons per day has been
calculated for this project based upon the fo~lowinq assumptions:
General Retail Space
Restaurant Space
(435 seats)
113.000 sq.ft, @ 0.1 qal/sq.ft.
7,000 sq,ft.
@50 qal/seat
This parcel of land is currently zoned aqricultural in Palm Beach
County. As such. an averaqe flow of 350 qallons per day per unit
at the existinc zoninc would cenerate an averaqe of 1.050 qallons
per day.
The C,ount y' s Comprehensive P Ian shows an allowed land use of 8
dwelling units per acre, Thus, 96 multi-family units could be"
constructed on this parcel, At a flow rate of 300 qallons per
day per unit, an averace daily flow of 28,800 qallons per day can
be expected'; Thus. the flow rate for this commercial project is
eqUivalent to the residential development rate allowed under the
County's Comprehensive Plan.
,.,.,
Mr. Lindsey Walters
January 31, 1990
BOYllton Beach Boulevard PCD
Page T~o
Typically, there is very little difference in water and sewer
flow rates for commercial uses unless irri9ation is 90in9 to be
done from public water. At this time, the source of irri9ation
water is planned to be from on-site wells. ~
Very truly yours,
~~E.
KSR/jr
.
. .
~t
~.
: ':';:*f.~:.},qr:,~: "t::, 'c' ,
..i....I.. "0
.~. .... ' ... ~.
'::~;}~ ../~i /i- T ':~
"rL":t.r.r_f,~ ,.. ..".
.,
Kilday & Aaaoclat..
Landscape Architects/Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 . Fax: 14071 689-2592
January 31. 1990
Mr. Jim Golden. Senior City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
120 E, Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
RE:
Proposed
Rezonings
Annexations,
Land
Use
Designations.
and
Dear Mr. Golden,
Attached you will find six applications for a variety of
Annexations. Land Use Designations and Rezonings. While each
of these parcels have separate and distinct proposals. they
share some similarities which are addressed herein.
While the Winchester family has some involvement in all of
the parcels, the ownership of the parcels varies. In many
cases. Mr, and Mrs. Winchester have additional partners in
the parcels necessitating that each application be considered
separately and distinctly. I make this notation due to our
previous discussion regarding "aggregation" and its effect on
possible future Development of Regional Impacts.
After giving you time to make a preliminary review of these
applications, I will set up a formal meeting with yourself,
myself, and Mr. Michael Schroeder, attorney for the
Winchester's and, in fact. applicant on some of these
parcels. At that time, we can review the specific language
of State Ordinances regarding "aggregation" and make a
determination as to whether this section of the Ordinance
applies to any or all of these properties.
Additionally, have submitted site plans and Site Plan
Review data sheets for all of the projects except the large
annexation (Mall South). We are not requesting site plan
approval for any of the projectsat this time. However, due to
the special regulations required for some of the uses and our
desire to indicate intensity of the proposed use (which
relates to the traffic study submitted as part of the
rezoning requests). we believed this information was
necessary tor zoning purposes. Separate applications tor site
plan approval will be made at a later date.
Mr. Jim Golden
.January :31. 1990
Page 2
Addressing the specific requests before you. the following
should supplement the applications:
1. Mall South Parcel - This 49 acre parcel of property is
only seeking Annexation. Land Use Designation, and
Zoning consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan of
Boynton Beach. There are no development plans for this
parcel at this time, In the past. there has been
discussion whether development of this site will
constitute a Development of Regional Impact. That
determination cannot be made until the petitioner
develops specific plans for future construction on this
site, There are no plans at this time. The application
clearly indicates that the site will require ultimate
rezoning to Planned Commercial Development at which time
the Development of Regional Impact thresholds can be
assessed.
This Annexation. Land Use Designation and Zoning is
identical to the rezoning of 450 acres of Foundation
property which occurred approximately two years ago in
Palm Beach County. At that time, Palm Beach County
designated this 450 acres as IL-Light Industrial Zoning.
The undestanding at that time was that future
development ot the site would require submittal ot a
Special Exception for a Planned Industrial Development
or further rezoning to a Planned Industrial Park
Development Zoning District. For that reason. this
parcel was not deemed a Development of Regional Impact
at that time. The property is currently zoned in
accordance with the Land Use Plan although still vacant.
A determination of Development of Regional Impact
thresholds will occur at such time as this property
actually makes plans for development.
2. Proposed Service Station This application incLudes
Annexation, Land Use Designation. and Rezoning. In our
past conversations. references were made to special
language contained within the Comprehensive Plan
regarding the property south of the Boynton Mall (Area
7f). I have carefully read this section. It includes
the following verbiage, ",.,particular requirements ot
the City should be that these parcels be annexed prior
to development, that parcels be developed as planned
zoning districts...". This statement raises the
question as to whether all parcels must be zoned and
developed as Planned Commercial Developments. As you
are aware. the Planned Commercial Development Zoning
District requires a minimum of three acres. Three of
the applications within this area do not meet this
requirement. Therefore, the Planned Commercial
Mr, Jim Goiden
January 31, 1990
Page 3
Development Zoning District could not apply to these
sites. I would note the critical word in this statement
is "should" as opposed to "shall". I do not believe
that any text amendment is necessary to accommodate the
rezoning of these parcels to C-3. In fact, the City's
Code requires specific site plan approvals tor any
development occuring in these commercial districts and.
in tact, the goals and intent at the Planned Commercial
District will be achieved through those reviews.
The proposed use of a Service Station is a permitted use
within the C-3 Zoning District. However. due to the
fact that there are special regulations, a site plan has
been submitted with this application.
3. Mall Corner (Restaurant) The issues discussed above
regarding the Service Station apply also to this parcel,
This parcel is less than three acres in size negating
its ability to be rezoned to a Planned Commercial
Development. Theretore. the petitioner is requesting
the Commercial C-3 Zoning which would allow the
establishment of a Restaurant on the site. A Restaurant
is a permitted use within this zoning district.
However. for the establishment at the specific
intensity. a site plan has been submitted along with
additional site development information.
4. Proposed Retail/Oil Lube Site (Boynton Beach Boulevard
and Winchester Park Boulevard) - This application is
somewhat unusual in that a portion of the site is
already located within the municipal boundaries ot the
City of Boynton Beach. In this case, that property is
already zoned Commercial C-3. The petitioner will be
rezoning the balance of the site to C-3 to make the
zoning consistent throughout the entire parcel.
The Boynton Beach Zoning Code does not address uses such
as a Quick Oil Change facility. Clearly, this facility
does not meet the definition in the Zoning Code tor
Major Auto Repair. Theretore, it is assumed that it is
a permitted use tas are Service Stations) in the C-3
Zoning District. I will be happy to discuss this matter
with you more fully.
5, Boynton Beach Boulevard/Knuth Road Site - This parcel.
in addition to an Annexation request, wi 11 require an
amendment to the Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan to
change the existing Land Use Designation. The
petitioner is requesting a designation of Local Retail
Commercial. This property is currently designated as
Local Retail Commercial, in part. and 110derate Density.
. .
11r. J 1m Golden
Januarv 31. 199\}
Page "
in part. The petitioner is requesting that the entire
parcel be designated as Local Retail Commercial. Within
Palm Beach County the property is designated Commercial
(High Intensity), in part. and Commercial Recreation in
par t.
Additionally. because this property does exceed three
acres. the petitioner is requesting Rezoning of the
property to the Planned Commercial Development Zoning
District, Again, a site plan has been submitted for the
purpose of designating the proposed land use intensity
consistent with the traffic study which accompanies the
application. Final plans for site plan review will take
place at a later date.
b. University of Florida Trust This parcel is similar to
the Knuth Road parcel in that a Land Use ~mendment to
the Comprehensive Plan will be required. Both the
Boynton Beach and the Palm Beach County Comprehensive
Plans designate this property as High-Density
Residential. The petitioner is requesting that a
designation of Local Retai I Commercial be establ ished
for the site in its entirety. Again, this property is
of sufficient size to allow a request for the Planned
Commercial Development Zoning District.
While all of the attached
specific, I bel ieve this cover
to assist you in their review.
applications are complete and
letter helps provide a summary
Mv clients are concerned that these applications move forward
in an organized and consistent effort. Therefore. Mr.
Winchester, Mr, Schroeder, and/or mysel f wi 11 be avai lable at
anv time should you have any questions regarding these
matters. As previously indicated, 1 wi II contact your office
shortly to arrange a meeting between yourself and my clients
to review these applications and answer any questions.
However. believe you need adequate time to make your own
preliminary review prior to us getting together.
As indicated in your Comprehensive Plan, all of these parcels
of property belong within the jurisdication of the City of
Boynton Beach. We anticipate that these properties will make
a signiricant contribution to the tax base of the City
helping to relieve some ot the burden on the residents.
Tnank you very much tor your assistance in this matter to
~Ir. Jim Golden
January 31, 1990
Page 5
date.
future.
am
looking forward to working with you in the
Sincerely,
Kieran J.
KJK/lsk
C.c.
Gene Moore
Bill Winchester
Michael Schroeder
F i Ie
APPLICA TION
',~, c\';'" .'/
---- "
-
':/. /I,)
p]
i
bBNP._~?s_0.~s~Q~~~I-BNQLQ8-8sIQ~lN8-BEEbl~BIlQ~
City of Boynton Beach, Florida
Planning and Zoning Board
This application must be filled out completely and accurately and
submitted, together with the materials listed in Section II below, in two (2)
copies to the Planning Department. Incomplete applications will not be
proce!:'~sed M
Please Print Legibly or Type all Information.
1.
8s~s8Bb_l~EQB~BIlpN
Boynton
Beach Boulevard, PCD
1.
Project Name:
---------------------------------------------------
2. Type of Application (check one)
-------- aM Rezoning only
--------- b. Land Use Amendment only
._. ____...xx.._ c. Land Use Amendment and Rezoning
3. Date this Application is Accepted (to be filled out by Planning
Department) :
-------------------------,---------------------------------
4. Applicant~s Name (persDn or business entity in whose name this'
application is made):
Michael A. Schroederr Trustee
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ad d r e5S : : ~'2.!:.~'=._~~~:.~.,.~~~_~_~~<:.~=_:.._~~:________________________------
1l2.c::.~_~~!.2.~!..._~~:._~ ~~~~...-----------------.-----------------
Telephof'le.
Number: _1Q2=~1l=Ql~~___________________________________________
5. Agent~s Name (person, if any, representing applicant):
Ki ~':..<:.~_~:.._~.i}:.~_<:.:U~i_~d_':.Y.__&_~:..:..~'?.~':.~:..___________________---
Address: ~~~~_~~~'2.~_~~<:'~'=.~_~~=_:"_~~~:'~____________________________
1:i~t.._~~lJ!l._l2.~~<.<h.LL:J;",'__ll'!.Q..L_____________________________-
Planning Department 1-86
page 1
. Tel ephone
Number:
--------------------------------------------------------
(407) 689-5522
6. Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name:
__...____~~_~~_..~~__~,eE~_~_c::_~:t:,________________._____,---------------
Address:
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
Telephone
Number:
--------------------------------------------------------
7. Correspondence Address (if different than applicant or agent):*
__.___.____ _~_____._..________M_.____M__.________________________-----
--------------------------------------------------------
* This is the address to which all agendas, letters, and other
materials will be mailed.
8. What is the applicant's interest in the subject parcel?
(Owner, Buyer, Lessee, Builder, Developer, Contract Purchaser, etc.)
ConLraCL_Eurchas.e.r_ ___,__.________________.____________________________
9.
Street Address or Location of Subject Parcel:
South side of
-------------------
~2Y~!2~_~~~~~_~1~9~_~EEI2~~_2~Q_f~~!_.~~~~_Ef_~Q~gE~~~-~~~~--------
10. Legal Description of Subject Parcel:
----------------------------
______________,~~::___~.!,!_~~!:~9._~~.!!J!?g___~ I\~__..____________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Area of Subject Parcel
Ito the nearest hundredth (1/100) of an acre}:
---------------------------------------p--------------------------
14.76 acres
Planning Department 1-86
page 2
,J
"
EXHIBIT "A"
1.0TS C TtlRU E LESS STATE ROAD RIGHT or WAY, BI.OCK ~; LOTS C nllW 1:.
LESS STATE RO;\D RIGHT OF WAY, BLOCK ~, LOTS A THRU E, BLOCK 28 AND
LOTS A TliRU E IlLOCK 29 AS RECORDED IN PALM BEACH FARMS COMPANY
PLAT NO.8, IN 'PLAT l\OOK' ~, PAGE 73 OF TIlE PUBLIC RECORDS_ ,?F. ~~_LM
8~^CH COVNTY. FLORIDA,
TCX:;Etfftl~-\VITII lIlAT PART UF TilE 30' I<OAD 1< I(;IIT-OI' -WAY AS SHOWN
oN' !\130VE SA I D PLAT, IJOUNDED ON TilE NOI< III IW THE SOUTH R I GilT _
OF-WAY LINE OF BOYNTON BEAU I f\LVD. AND nOUNDED ON THE EAST BY
LOTS C, 0, E, L\LOCK II, AND LOTS A, Il, C, 0, E, I3LOCK 29 OF
AnOVE SA I D PLAT AND BOUNDED ON TilE WEST I\Y LOTS C, 0, E, I3LOCK
5, AND LOTS A, n, C, D, E, IlLCX~K 2S OF A130VE SAID PALM BEAUI
FARMS CO'vlPANY PLAT NO. S, AND IIOUNDED ON TilE SOUTI'I IIY TilE
EAS TERL Y EXTENS ION OF TilE NOR 111 LINE OF TRACT "G" AS RECORDED
IN STONEHAVEN PLAT 1\0. I, PLAT nOOK liS, PAGES 1-5, or THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF PALM nEACH COlINTY, FLOR I [)A.
A.0lc :
Co/? 10/,1///77 /4.7&:. Ac !nOTe or less
.,
12. Current Zoning District: A,kAg.ri.cult-llr.al.Resii!pnti..)
13.
Proposed Zoning District:
C.DllWlarr.i" 1 .IF' "nnpn .cowner.ci......l-~-e.J.~t
14.
Current Land Use Category:
118"
--------------------------------------
15. Proposed Land Use Category:
Commercial Local Retail
-------------------------------------
16. Int.ended Use of Subject Pay'cel: _.!'_'~_,!l_'j1.9.9111,_BJ?j;llj_LJl~J?~________
---------------------------------------.---------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
17. Developer or Builder:
__~Lb______.__,.._____.___________________.________
------------------------------------------------------------------
18. Architect:
,__.__, .J;;JLb___.._._._._,_,_ __.____._._____..___,____________,_____.________
19. Landscape Archit.ect.:
,_ JSi.e!: i:HL iJ _ Eilday,L.Kil da;,z _ ,,_A.ssoc ia:t.esT - .:r...c..--
20. Si te PI anner: ..___,Ki.eJ;.aJL.J....Kilda;,z,L.Kilda;,z-"-A.ssoc.iaj;.e,sT-..J:J'l~~--------
21. Civil Engineer: K~S~_RQger5~Conslll~ing_Enginee~s-----------------
?'"'
.......:M.
Traffic Engineer:
_._,KLS.....,RQgers.....Consul:ting._Engin.e.e..._.__.._____-----
23. Surveyor:
_ ~,tgh9,!:.g_,1.,.....$h~l2hg;rg_.&_a5SQcia:tes+._Inc__________-------
II. ~aI~81Bb~_IQ_~~_~Y~~!II~g_~lI~_BEEbl~eIlQ~
The following materials shall be submitted, in two (2) copies.
(check)
X a.
This application form.
~___b. A copy of the last. recorded warranty deed.
~____c. The foIl owi ng documents and 1 et.tf~rs of consent:
(11 If the propert.y is under joint Dr several ownership: A written
consent to the application by all owners of record, and
(2) If the applicant. is a contract purchaser: A copy of the
purchase contract and written consent of the owner and seller, and
131 If the applicant. is represent.ed by an authorized agent: A copy
of the agenc~ agreement, or written consent of the applicant, and
(4)
If the applicant is a lessee:
A copy of the lease agreement,
Planning Department 1-86
page 3
and the written ccmsent of the owner, and
(5) If the applicant is a corporation or ether business entity:
The name o.r the o.F.Ficer or per"son responsible for the application,
and written proof that said person has the delegated authority to
represent the corporation or other business entity~ or in lieu
thereof, written proof that he is in fact an officer of the
cor-poration.
x
d, A sealed boundary survey of the subject parcel by a surveyor
registered in the state of Florida, dated not more than six (6) months
prior to the date of submission of the application, at a scale
prescribed by the Planning Department, and containing the following
infoy.mation:
II) An accurate legal description of the subject parcel.
(2) A computation of the total acreage of the subject parcel to the
nearest hundredth (1/100) of an acre.
(3) A tree survey, which conforms to the requirements of the City of
Boynton Beach TreQ Preservation Ordinance. This requirement may be
waived by the Planning Director where found to be unrelated to the
land use or zoning issues involved with the application.
__~_e. A complete certified list of all property owners, mailing addresses,
and legal descriptions for all properties within at least four hundred
(400) feet of the subject parcel as recorded in the latest official tax
rolls in the county court house shall be furnished by the applicant.
Postage, and mailing labels or addressed envelopes must also be provided.
Said list shall be accompanied by an affidavit stating that to the best
of the applicant's knowledge said list is complete and accurate.
Notification of surrounding property ownerS will be done by the City of
Boynton Beach.
__lef.
of
to
A copy of the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's maps showing all
the properties referred to in paragraph e. above, and their relation
the $ubject parcel.
__X_g. A statement by the applicant justifying the zoning requested,
including reasons why the property is unsuitable for development under
the existi~g zoning and more suitable for development under the proposed
zoning.
X h. A comparison of the impacts that would be created by development
under the proposed zoning, with the impacts that would be created by
development under the existing zoning, which shall include:
(1) A comparison of the potential square footage Dr number and type
of dwelling units under the existing zoning with that which would be
allowed under the proposed zoning or development.
(2) A statement of the
zoning or development,
e:-, c 1 uded.
uses that would be allowed in the proposed
and any particular uses that would be
Planning Department 1-86
page 4
~~_(3)
PropoRed timing and phaRing of the development.
N~h__._(4) For. propoRed "oning of property t<o commercial or industrial
districts, where the area of the slJbject parcel exceeds one (1) acre,
a market analysis shall be submitted. Said market analysis shall
estimate and take into consideration the availability of all other
properties within one and one-half (1.5) miles of the subject
parcels, which are zoned for uses similar to those proposed on the
subject parcel, and shall estimate and take into consideration the
vacancy rate of all existing buildings within the same distance which
are occupied by uses which are similar to those proposed on the
SUbjf:?Ct. pal"o!:l'?l.
,_1<..._ (5) A c<omp"....ison of tt-a.ffic which w<ould be generat.ed under the
proposed zoning or development, with the traffic that would be
generated under the current zoning; also, an analysis of traffic
movements at the intersections of driveways that would serve the
property and surrolJndi.ng roadways, and improvements that would be
necessary to accomodate such traffic movements. For proposed
developmf..:?nt.:; l,."Jl.,ich t"Jould generate thre.e-thou5and (3,000) vehicle
trips per day or more, or two-hundred fifty (250) or more
single-directional vehicle trips wittlin a one (1) hour period, a
traffic impact analysis shall be required. Said traffic impact
analysis shall include projected trip generation for the development,
for all major roadways and intersections within one and one-half
(1.5) miles of the subject parcel, as well as traffic that would
utilize local streets thr<ough residential zoning districtR. Said
traffic impact analysis shall compare traffic levels between the
existing zoning and the proposed zoning or development of the subject
parcel, and shall take into consideration all development that would
he possible under the current zoning wittlin the City, adjacent
cities, and within the ur1incorporated area of Palm Beach County
withirl a radills o.f .five (5) miles. For those parcels lying in the
unincorporated area of Palm Beach COlJnty, which are not currently
zoned for urban land uses, the potential land uses according to the
Palm Beach County comprehensive plan shall be used. Where said
parcels are shown on the Palm Beach County comprehenRive plan under
residential land use categories, the midpoint of the density range
shown on County comprehensive plan shall be used. Where a
county-wide study of traffic generation at build-out haR been adapted
or i~ utilized by Palm Beach County, the levels of traffic that are
prOjected by said study shall in all cases be used to project
background traffic in the traffic impact analysis submitted by the
applicant. The format and standards URed in the traffic impact
analysis shall be the same as those which are required by Palm Beach
C<ounty, with the exception of the requirements listed above. Such
traffic impact analysis shall include recommendations for the
mitigation of traffic impacts, consistent with the standards which
have been adopted by or are utilized by Palm Beach County.
x
(6) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison of the water
demand for development under the proposed "oning or development with
water demand under the existing "oning. Water demand~shall be
estimated using the standards adapted by the Palm Beach County Health
Planning Department 1-86
pi?ge 5
.'
Department for estimating such demand, unless different standards are
justified by a registered engineer. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the water system shall also be included, where
e}:isting facilities would be inadequate to serve development under
the proposed zoning.
__4(7) For parcf.ls largel" than one (1) acre, a comparison of sewage
flows that would be generated under the proposed zoning or
development with that which would be generated under the existing
zoning. Sewage flows shall be estimated using the standards adopted
by th,. Palm B"ach County Health Department for estimating such flows,
unless different standards are justified by a registered engineer.
Commitment to the provision of improvements to the sewage collection
system shall also be incllJded~ where the ewisting facilities would be
inadeguate to serve development under the proposed zoning.
__~ll:I3) For proposed resid<?ntial developments larger than one (l) acy-e, a
comparison of the projected population under the proposed zoning or
development with the projected population under the existing zoning.
Population projections according to age groups for the proposed
development shall be requj,red, where more than fifty (50) dwellings,
or 50 sleeping rooms irl the case (]f grOljp housing, would be allowed
under the proposed zoning. Applications for rezoning to commercial
or industrial zoning districts which exceed one (1) acre in area
shall also provide projections for the number of employees.
(9) At the request of the Planning Department, Planning and Zoning
Board, or City Council, the applicant shall also submit proposals for
minimizing land use conflicts with surrounding properties. The
applicant shall provide a summary of the nuisances and hazards
associated with development under the proposed zoning, as well a~
proposi1ls for mit.igation such nuisances and hazardC:::L. Such summary
shall also include, where applicable, e:{clusion of particular uses,
limitations on hours of operation, proposed location of loading
areas, dumpsters, arId mechanical equipment, screening of service
areas and mechanical equipment, location of driveways and service
entrance, and specifications for site lighting. Nuisances an hazards
shall be abated or mitigated so as to conform to the performance
standards contairlPd in the City~s zoning ,regulations and the
standards ~ontained in the City~s noise control ordinance. Also,
statements concerning the height~ orientation, and bulk of
str-u'ctl.H..E~'::i, setbackS"! .from pr-oper1:y lines, and measure'5 for screening
anel buff <>\".:[ ng tl',p prDpos<>d c1evE,lopment shall be provi ded. At the
request of the Planning and Zoning Board or City Council~ the
applicar,t shall also state the type of construction and architectural
styles that will be employed in the proposed development.
(101 At the request of the Planning Department, Planning and Zoning
Board, or City Council, the applicant shall also submit the following
information:
(a) Official soil conservation service classification by soil
associations and all areas subject to inundation and high ground
water levels.
Planning Department 1-86
page 6
I
~ JAN-22-'90 MON 12:13 ID:KILDAY ~ AS~uCIATES TEL NO:407-6S9-2592
11204 P03
Cb) Existing and p~oposect grade elevations.
(c) Existing O~ p~oposed wate~ bodies.
Cd) Fo~m of o\.nenship and fo~m of o~gani::ation to maintain common
Spdces and recreational facilities.
(e) A w~itten commitment to the p~ovision of all nece$sa~y
fBcilities fo~ .to~m d~ainaq8, wato~ supplY, sowago collection
and t~eatment, solid wasto di"posal, hB::a~dous waste disposal,
fi~e p~otection, easements or rights-of-way, roadways, recreation
and pa~k a~eas, school sites, and othe~ public improvements or
dedications as may bo ~equJ.red.
(11) For rezonings to planned zoning districts, the specific
requirements fo~ submission of applications for ~.zoning to such
dist~icts shall alsO be sat.i.sfi.ecl. Furthermor'", ol.l m"terials required
for'" subdivision master plan shall also be submitted.
111. ~EE61~~Il9.~_E~~~~ Fees shall be paid at the time that the application
is submitted, acco~ding to the feeB which have been sdopted by
ordinance or resoll-Ition. The I:>lanning Department will inform'the
applicant as to the fee. which are required. All fees shall be paid by
Check, payable to the City of Boynton Beach.
v. g~BIIEIGeIlQ~
J.
(1) (We) understand that this application and all plan and papers
submitted herewith become a part of the permanent records of the
Planning and Zoning Board. (1) CWe) hereby certify t.hat the above
. ~tatements and any statements or showings in any papers or plans
~ubmitted herewith are true to the b.Bt of (my) (our) knowledge and
alief. This plication will. not be accepted unless signed
accorf9~ h instructions beloW.
~ ___~-____~__- __~~~-."'c. ____j/n.b:P..--
Signature of QwnerCs) or Trustee, Date
or Autho~ized Principal f property
i9 owned bY'" corporat10n or \Jther~ I / /:1.b'/ I.I"'~QA
bU"J.?!'~~ 'Wtity. ~ -1- X _6:S-IC~ Vr _ -' 'L"'-'~7..v
~n&!!:f.u t> _ LJt;~ roe D IDNE ~eJ
C:HARLENE B9YNI'ON II-~/i' () . . .
e~I~Q8lbeIIQ~_QE_e~~~I Date
@~~t2.tf.ldd0,&f;:..~JL~ (:?Q.-;?~.a~ r;~ ---~~- ~~----
signa;yre of Authoribd'- A9~ /' Datr-
I.
(1) (We) hereby designate the above <;igned person 1"'5 (my) (oLtr) .authorized
agent with regard to this opplico.tion.
y--~~~-~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~:~:~~~~---
Signature of owner(,;) or Trustee,
------------------
Date
Planning Department 1-86
p.:"],,, 7
APPLICA TION
~;:-
/~ .
S ..i-::.!/:y
, BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ANNEXATION APPLICATION FORM
NOTE:
This form must be filled out completely and accurately
and must accompany all applications submitted to the
planning Department. (2 copies of app1icat~on required)
..
PROJECT NAME: Boynton Beach Boulevard,PCD
AGENT'S NAME: Kieran J. Kilday/Kilday & Associates
ADDRESS: 1551 Forum Place, B1dq. 100-A
West Palm Beach, FL. 33401
PHONE:
407-689-5522
OWNER'S NAME:
(or trustee's)
ADDRESS:
Charlene Boyntonr Donald Lowe & University of FLorida
Founda tion, In,
1505 N.W. 2nd Ave.r Boynton Beachr FL. 33436
PHONE: 904-392-1691
..
PROJECT LOCATION: South side of Boynton Beach Blvd. approx. 950
(not legal description) feet west of Congress Ave.
CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:*
(if different than
agent or owner)
* This is the address to which all agendas, letters and
other materials will be forwarded.
-1-
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION
INSTRUCTIONS
All properties within a single application must be contiguous and
immediately adjacent to one another, or be the subject of separate
applications.
No application shall be accepted unless it is presented on the
official form of City of Boynton Beach, Florida. The applicant must
submit two copies of this application and other required information.
Before an application may be accepted, it must furly comply with all
required information as stated below.
ATTACH THE FOLLOWING REQUIRED INFORMATION TO THIS APPLICATION:
1. a. A copy of the recorded subdivision plat if the subject
property is a lot or lots of record.
or
b. All other property must be shown on a certified legal survey
made by a surveyor registered in the State of Florida and
drawn to a scale appropriate to the size of the subject
property. The legal survey shall include an accurate legal
description of the subject property to be annexed, and a
computation of the total area of the subject property,
computed in square footage and to the nearest one-tenth
(1/10) of an acre,
2. A statement of the applicant's interest in the property to be
annexed, including a copy of the last recorded Warranty Deed,
and:
a. If joint and several ownership; a written consent to the
annexatio~ petition by all owners of record, ~
b. If a lessee, a copy of the Lease Agreement and written
consent of the owner, ~
c. If an authorized agent, a copy of the Agency Agreement or
written consent of the seller/owner, ~
d. If a corporation or other business entity, the name of the
officer or person responsible for the application and
written proof that said representative has the delegated
authority to represent the corporation or other business
entity, or in lieu thereof, written proof that he is' in fact
an officer of the corporation or other business entity, ~
e. If a contract purchase, a copy of the Purchase Contract and
written consent of the seller/owner.
COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION FORM AND SUBMIT WITH REQUIRED
ATTACHMENTS TO:
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
200 NO. SEACREST BLVD. .
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33435
( 407)738-7490
-2-
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA
APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION
DATE APPLICATION FILED:
DATE OF TENTATIVE APPROVAL:
REJECTION,
DATE OF COMPLETION OF ANNEXATION REPORT:
DATE OF ORDINANCE PROPOSAL:
ORDINANCE I
DATE OF ORDINANCE ADOPTION:
REJECTION:
DATE OF REFERENDUM IF REQUIRED:
RESULTS OF REFERENDUM:
FOR
AGAINST
DATE fu~NEXATION BECOMES EFFECTIVE:
FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY
DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS LINE
GENERAL DATA
Name of Developer/Owner: University of Florida Foundation, Inc.
Area of subject Property: 642,945,60
Sq, Ft. or' '.4.76 Acres
Estimated Present population: -o-
AR_Agricultural
Existing zoning:Residential Density Allowed: Idu/Sac.d.U.'s
Proposed Zoning: Commercj: "l/?CD Density Allowed:
d.u.' s
EXISTING UTILITIES
water:
Bovnton Beach Utilities
Wastewater Collection:
Boynton Beach Utilities
solid Waste (garbage):
city of Boynton Beaoh
-3-
"
STATEMENT OF USE
Existing use:
Vacant
p,opo,ed ",e,Pl.nned Co..e"i.l Develo ment with a total of 120 000 -
gross square feet of Retail, Bank and a Restaurant.
. , .
JUSTIFICATION
Express in your own words why this annexation will be beneficial to
Boynton Beach, Florida:
See Attached
EXACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED
See Attached Exhibit "A"
EXHIBIT "A"
~OTS C TtIRU E LESS STATE ROAD RIGHT or WAY, Bl.OCK 4; LOTS C THRU 1;,
LESS STATE RoliD RIGHT or WAY, BLOCK 5, LOTS A THIW 1:, ULOCK Z3 AND
LOTS A TliRU E, IILOCK n, AS RECORDED IN PALM (lEACH fARMS C::OMPANY
PLA T NO. S, IN I'LA T !lOOK }, PAGE 7) 01' TIlE PlJ!lLIC RECOR,?S. ?I'. ~~.LM
BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
rcx;ctfIEll'\VITlI IIIAT PAin uF TIlE 10' IlOAD IUGHT,or,wAY AS SHOwN
ON' IiUOVE SAID I'LAT, IlCXINDED C'N THE NOIHH BY THE SC1UTH RIGHT.
0F,\VAY LIN!: 01' I}OYNTO'J I)"AUI ~LVI). AND BOUNDED C'N THE EAST ~y
LOTS C, n, r:., L\LOCJ< II, AND LOTS ^, n, C, 0, E, GLOCK 29 or-
AIIOV[ SAID PLAT AND nOUND"D C'N THE W[ST II\' LOTS C, 0, E, !lLCCK
). AND LOT..) A, n, C, [), E, "LCCK 2 3 OF AIlOVE SA I D PALM !lEACH
FAHMS CO\II'ANY PLAT N:.). 3, AND IICXINDED C'N TI-IE SOUTH Ill' THE
EAS TEllL I' EXT[NS ION 01' TilE I\KJH111 LINE OF TllIiCT "G" AS RECOHDED
IN STC'NI:iIAV!:N PLAT NO. I, PLAT mXlK 43, PAGES I.), Of THE PU~LIC
H!:COlms 01' I'ALM IIEAClI COIINTY, FLOR IDA.
/'v~ Ie :
tCln/;'/,1)//7j 14.7~ Ac /i7o/'col'/e.ss
:":.
g
~
~
>
.
If
~
.:.>;
~
I
~
f
.'"
',wt_~
'. "'..1'
<' .
;'.)
"
r "r"".'"""::
/SL~
"'"
-"- ~'-----:'T'
io,
I
-1,"
. .'-~~;-
" '
..'
Kilday & Assoclat..
Landscape Architects! Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suito 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(4071 689,5522 . Fax: 1407) 689,2592
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
FOR
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD PCD
The petitioner is, requesting the Annexation, Amendment
to the Land Use Plan, and Rezoning of a 14.7 acre
parcel of land located on the south side of Boynton
Beach Boulevard. The property is currently 'in ~e
unincorporated area of Palm Beach County and zoned AR-
Agricultural Residential. This parcel abuts Boynton
Beach city limits on all sides and is an enclave which
clearly belongs within the City of Boynton Beach.
The petitioner is requesting an amendment to the Boyn-
ton Beach Land Use Plan to designate this property as
Local Retail Commercial. currently, the Comprehensive
Plan has a designation of High Density for this site.
Due to the nature of the surrounding land uses, the
petitioner believes that a designation of Local Retail
commercial is appropriate provided that the site
develops as a Planned commercial Development within the
Planned commercial Development ~oning District. This
rezoning is also part of this request.
The property is located on the south side of Boynton
Beach Boulevard immediately to the west of the existing
Post Office. To the south of the Post Office is an
Industrial zoned area and to the south of the site is
an existing school. The proposed Planned Commercial
Development has been oriented to face toward the
Industrial and Post Office area and away from adjacent
residential properties to the west. A significant
added buffer is provided along the property's west
line. In addition, existing streets divide this ·
property from the nearest residential lots.
The proposed annexation will provide for ultimate
consolidation of incorporated parcels to the City. The
proposed land use will provide for expansion of the
city's tax base. Already, the City provides 'many
services to all the properties surrounding the site,
and therefore, the effect of this use on this property
should have a minimal affect on the expected added
services.
The Local Retail Commercial designation is consistent
with the other commercially d~signated property within
the immediate vicinity across the street on the north
side of Boynton Beach Boulevard. ,
:":.
j,'"
,"
..;~
.'t~.
---~_:,'-
~_.." ...
. :~f~~>-t~ ~
. :.:,,: .': .:;I~"
,..~.,.. .4.!:Z:J....., '
___~....._':....,'n'.'"t"___..
..
.
.
.
.'
.
~/'$
[liE l..~ 1 1 (J'
City at Boynton' Buch
I?l.~!,lng Department
Name of Development/Owner Michael A.Schroeder,Trustee/Charlene Boynton
Donald Lowe,Univ. of Florida Foundation,Inc.
Locate the sUbj,ect property on. this map and shade in the area.
== JAN-22~'90 MON 12:15 ID:KILDAX ~ ASSOCIATES TEL NQ:407-689-2592
11204 1'05
-
OWNERS AUTHORIZATION
Under the provisions for voluntary Annexation, Florida statutes
require that a petition for annexation must bear the signatures
of all owners of property in an area to be annexed. The authority
author' zing a person other than the owner to sign such a petition must
etched to and accompany such petition.
IT'i OF FLORIDA ATION, INC.
QJ~
~
Q11IRLENE BOYNTON
'. ,
/(
ature of ~wner(s
!..fJ;jE
of Record
Charlene Boynton
Donald Lowe
University of Florida
Foundation, Inc.
TYPe Name of ownerls)
Kieran J. Kilday/Kilday & Asso~iates
Type Name of APplic~nt '.
1505 N.W. 2nd Avenue
Street AddresS
1551 Forum p]nC~. R1nq 1nn-A
Street AddresS
Boynton Beach, FL. 33436
City and State
West Palm Beach,.FL. 33401
City and State
904-392-1691
Telephone Number
407-689-5522
Telephone NumDer
APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
(1) (We) affirm and certify that (I) (We) understand and will
comply with the provisions and regulations of Boynton Beach, Florida
Zoning Code. (I) (We) further certify that the above statements or
diagrams made on any paper or plans submitted herewith are true ,to the
best"of (my) (our) knowledge and belief. Further (I) (We)
understand that this application, attachments, and fees become part of
the Official Records of Boynton Beach, Florida and are not returnable;
: '0
APPLICANT IS:
optionee
~~1/'7 ..., I //......
. ~.~~,"
'gnature 0 Applicant . t:i!
Kieran J Kilday
Kildav & Associates, Inc.
Type,Name of Applicant
Owner
Lessee
1551 Forum Place 100A
street Address
'.
xx
Agent
West Palm Beach,FL 33401
City and State
Contract
purchaser
(407) 689-5522
Telephone Number
EXHIBIT "A"
l.OTS C TtlRU E, LESS STATE ROAD RIGHT or WAY, BLOCK ~; LOTS C nllw 1.:,
LESS STATE ROM) RIGHT OF WAY, BLOCK " LOTS A TliRU E, BLOCI~ 2& AND
LOTS ^ TliRU E, IILOCK 29, AS RECORDED IN PALM BEAClI FARMS <:=OMrANY
PLA T NO.8, IN l'LA T l\OOK " rAGE 73 OF TIlE PUBLIC RECOIWS. ,?f'. ~~~LM
BEACH CO\,JNTY, FLORlDA.
TOGEtHEI~-\VjTII TIIAT PAIn LiF Til[ 30' I{(),/\D I{I(;IIT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN
oN" A13LiVE SA I D PLAT, 1\()lJNDED ON TilE NOIHII II)' TilE SOUTH R I GilT -
OF-WAY LINI:: OF 130YNTON I3EAl:i1 [lLvn. AND I\OUNIJED ON THE EAST !W
LOTS C, D, E, I3LOCK I" AND LOTS A, 1\, C, D, E, I\LOCK 29 or
AI\O\lE SA I D PLAT AND BOUNDED ON TIlE WE,:) l' II)' LOTS C:, D, E, BLOCK
5, AND LOTS A, Ii, C, D, E, I\LCX~K 23 OF A!\OVE SAID PALM BEACH
FARMS CCYv\PANY PLAT NO.3, AND 1\01lNDEI) ON TIlE SOUTH Ill' THE
EASTERLY EXTENSION 01' TilE f\K)R111 LiNE 01' TIMeT "G" AS RECOIWED
IN STONEHAVEN PLAT NO. I, PLAT liooK 43, PAGES 1-5, or- THE PUliLIC
RECORDS OF PALM I\EACH COINTY, FLORIDA.
!I-0!C :
Can!a/////7j 14.7~ /Ie More OY less