REVIEW COMMENTS
,.
TJfE PI D r'/=/i) I i= /:(,
I.; SftOU.~D ;j-{{f;:s_) [)i: P[=({.AJTTEfJ o;';(o,{lw, ,;U,j/jJ -1l1EJiuc
.[!.Jl/fAl Tift /';<&XIJtJTt To Tltf.j'-f.51A/TcKt/JA-A/?E)t;/;j)
.:Tftf Sff&I<.T ("[)If.:. BtTWE!:); .1-15 :rJvTep.OfJrA/((/;- r rifE
; If :( t<. it R:r!J ~ E ./- Ii! 7I3 X. C/tIt- Iv? ~
i
.
], l /JoRE JUFo!?/1,f-r;ro).; c"A/ A-p5-1-{j.,=>VT .5T/2/:5T5 {.rrff)1 Itg- J
l
.
I
J :!j(ofo5FD LoT {-trouT (JTE)t 1=/0)
Y'.: !ta!3 S.> 1M/fiE w/t (5 C -II To II r t;j-j- ler J) k/3 1t'c;A-fJ To j}J::
. .f?IrU3 [) flo fr:ET AfA-R T ?
S. UTTLJTJe5 ST/rrfJ1E),jT {[rfb JrJ7)
{ /0 r feD i!U:-EAi/J(:lT ..s/JoULD BE Pf..s'j:cJvlfrC'D eN Tiff:
; )JA'Sf F/\ POrN
"
...........:: '.
7 i! _~ !to lAC 1J flir V E- /J- ! Jr lJl,a A / ;;: (J .It/li/t } 4/ j) ref T :Toy -{J F ~
~.- "',fori-^---'irt-cf!j{:: P'-vr-
I ~~ .> /... I]' I I~ / i- ,-
L n:=-:-.., ------- - ' It #~. -2.
j\ 1~-~-~_-1 ~!.f 5 . ~o I ~l:~ .{..
Ii
If{(/r[.r7Tl3:~- ->>0 (o,"fItF.J/;'--{
ii
MEMORANDUM
'"
Planning Dept.
DATE
May 14, 1986
FILl!
FROM
Lt. Dale S. Hammack
police Dept.
!lUIIJ!:CT
The P.C.D. Center
N.W. 22nd Ave. and High Ridge Rd.
As per the dicussion at the T.R.B. meeting on 13 May 198b, I feel the
entrance on N.W. 22nd Ave. has to be eliminated. The entrance is too
close to the intersection of both 1-95 (S.R. 9) and to High Ridge Rd.
I also feel the number of entrances onto H~gh Ridge Rd. from the site is
excessive. I feel the number should be reduced to one with an enclosed
loop road or at most two entrances with a loop connector road.
tiC':
.~J~
Lt. Dale S. Hammack
police Department
DH:as
11EMORI;NDUM
:,8 ~lay 19B6
TO:
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FFmM:
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO
PLANNING DIRECTOR
F(E:
TI-IE: PCD CENTER
LAND USE AMENDMENT
AND REZONING AP~_ICATION
~~mm~~Yi Steven W. Deutsch, trustee, is requesting that a 13 acre
parcel of land, owned by the City of Boynton Beach, lying at the
southwest corner of Interstate 95 and N~W. 22nd Avenue be rezoned from
REC Recreation to PCD Planned Commercial Development, and that the
Futur"e L..and Use Plan fol'- thil.:5 par-eel b(~ amendf=d -from llR€~creationall1 to
"OffiCE' Commel'~c:ialll.. Cur.I....€:?ntl.'l the pr'opel'~ty is an undevelopt?d par-k
site, except for- a firing range and a dog training facility which are
operated by the Fraternal Order of Police. Proposed use of the parcel
would be a 287,250 square foot office development, which would be
developed as part of the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce. Rezoning of
the subject parcel for commercial development is proposed by the City
staff and the developer, an will be conditioned upon the developer of
the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce dedicating a suitable park site
elsewher-e in the PID. The reason for this this proposed land exchange
is that both the City and the developer have agreed that F.O.P. site
is not of a suitable size or location for a park, an would be more
suitable for office development, if an alternative park site is
p,.....ovi ded"
$~~~Q~n~ing_b~n~_Y~~_~D~_~QDiD9_l~g~_~it~~b~~_i9~~tigD_m~gli
Immediately to the east of the subject parcel is the Interstate 95
right-af-way. To the east of 1-95 is an R-l zoning district, which is
developed for moderately-priced single family housing. N.W. 22nd
Avenue lies along the northern boundary of the parcel. High Ridge
Road lies approximately 600 feet to the west of the parcel. The
master plan for the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce shows High Ridge
Road to be relocated to the east, which would place High Ridge Road
along the western boundary of the subject parcel. All of the
surrounding property to the north, west and south is zoned lIPID
Planned Industr"i.al Development" and is par-t. of t.he Boynton Beach Park
of Commerce. To the north of 22nd Avenue and west of High Ridge Road,
the master plan for the Park of Commerce specifies office and/or hotel
development. To the south and southwest, the master plan specifies
industrial and research & development uses.
page 1
B~~QDiD9i Rezoning would c~eate a 13-ac~e Planned Commercial
Development adjacent to a 540-acre Planned Industrial Development.
The Boynton Beach Park of Commerce PID will contain approximately 150
acres of office development, 200 acres of industrial development, and
30 acres of commercial development. The proposed PIC would be a
continuation of the office uses which have been approved in the Park
of COmmf?r- c l~ ~
~,~ 9!I!P. t~, ~ b. f.,?!J. JA t:~ ~ _I: 1- ~!J. ::-:=:E ~~~:t!::~ r. ~E _'= €=.1!J. 9 _ ~ ?~_M~ 12_~,
The Future Land Use Map contained in the Land Use Element of the
Compr-ehensi ve PI an shows the subj act par'cel ill the "Rec:reati onalll
c:ategor'y.. A Lane! Use Amendment. to IlOffice Commercialll, as propol.:'5ed by
the applicant., would be necessary.
g9mR~~h~D?iY~_EL~D==I~~ii
The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are relevant to this
application:
"Enc:ouraqe th(~ df:::velopment_ of complementary land uses~ II (p. 7)
IIEncourage t.he development. Df cammer-cial alnd us;es whE?I"'e accessibility
is:f gr'eate~;t and wtH~re impacts to residential LI~5es are minimized~ II (p.
n
"Encourage tt18 complete df~velopment of indust~ial land as industrial
parks or concentrated industrial areas, in order to maximize the
1 inkage between c:omplt?mentarv industTies. II (p. ~$9)
llEliminc,t.e thl? indiscroirninate destr'uct.ion of native vegetationll. (p..
6)
'IPt-ovic.1€~ adequatt.~ open ~;pace and recreation facilities and pt-ograms to
meet. t.hE~ needs e')f present and fl.ltLU''''e r-esiclentsu II (p. '7)
nUttl iZE~ c-2}:isting publ ic prooper-ty 'for recr-eiation developmentu II (pu '7)
IICocH"'dinat.E\ the pr-ovision of opf~n space i:l.nd r-ecreation facilities
wit.hin new privat.e development to ensure an adequate range of
r'ecrei:."'\tion opp()rntuniti.E~s" lL (p. ])
ll"..usinCE~ much of thE) available acreage [-for parks] is not prRe~rfently
centrally located so as to serve an area of immediate need, presently
owned public land should be rese~ved for future recreation development
as funding becomes available. In particular the FuO.P~A.. sit.e should
be rRf.-?,!:;jE.~r~vE-?d fcn-' futur"(~ n€-?i(,:Jhborhood par-k..... II (pagEl '1,9)
l?~\:J@f?;_
Proposed Ordinance 86-10 requires that the Planning Department
evaluate land use amendment/rezoning requests with respect to the
page ::
following issues:
a~ "WhethE:?I'~ tr'lf? proposed rezoning would be consistent with
applicable comprehensive plan policies. The Planning Department
shall also recommend limitations or requirements which would have
to be imposed on subsequent development of the property~ in order
t.o cCJmp 1 V wi th pol i c: i \'2:, cont,:.\i ned i n thE~ cClmprehen~;i ve plan.. II
In 1982, t.he City acquired a 19 acre site (proposed North District
Park), which will be located almost directly east of the subject
parcelij on the east side of 1-95. This site is a more suitable
location for a neighborhood or district park to serve the northern end
of the City, and largely eliminates the need for a park to be located
on the subject parcel~
It is recommended that~ in order to provide equivalent park acreage~
that a park site of approximately 17 acres be dedicated to the City,
in the northwestern corner of the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce~ with
public access from the internal collector road. A wetland would be
established on this parcel by the developer in accordance with
Development of Regional Impact for Boynton Beach Park of Commerce.
In (')r~der~ to pr.'t,~vent t.he "incjiscF"iminat€~ destruction of native
vegetationll the applicant 5hould attempt to preSBF"Ve the existing sand
pine and slash pine trees to the maximum extent possible. This will
make it necessary for grade changes on the site to be minimized.
Drainage will be into the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce drainage
system; therefore, on-site stormwateF" retention areas will not be
I'H.".?ec!ed and e::i':;ting gl'~ades will not. have to bE;:' dl'"asti,Cei\lly altf~red..
In order to minimize erosion and reduce blowing sand~ clearing of
building site should not commence prior to development of the site..
Furthermore, during land clearing and site preparation~ wetting
operations of other techniques for contr~olling blowing sand should be
underta~en arld implemented by the developer.
b. "Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the
established l.and use pattern, OF" would create an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, or would
constj,tute a grant of special privilege to an individual property
owner as contrasted with the protection of the public welfare. II
Office uses have been established as the future land use in the
surrounding Boynton Beach Park of Commerce. The proposed pen would be
an exterlsion of the proposed land uses in t.he Boynton Beach Park of
Commerce. Therefore, rezoning to a pen for office use would not
consitute spot zoning.
c::~ IIWh€-~th(.;:.r~ changed OF" changing conditions make the proposed
rezoning desirable~"
Approval of the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce PIn has changed the
predominate land use in area from residential to office and
page -::;;
industrial. Park of Commerce also presented opportunity to trade
subject parcel for a parcel which would be more suitable for park
devE~l opmf~nt ~
d. "Whether" the p,"oposed n~zoning would be compatible with
ut.i.lity systems, r.oadways~1 and other" publi.c facilit.iesull
Utilities for the proposed pce would be adec~ate, when the water and
sewer lines for the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce are installed. The
proposed office development would consume approximately 36,000 gallons
19pdl of water, compared to approximately 10,0~) gpd if the property
were to be developed as a park. The office development would generate
28,000 gpd sewage, compared to approximately 7,800 gpd for a park.
The proposed peD Would generate about 3,165 trips per day compared to
780 trips which would be generated if th site were to developed as a
park. In the evening peak hour, 600 trips would be generated.
A traffic impact analysis for pen site has been submitted and is
attached. Road improvements which would be needed to serve property
would be made in accordance with improvements required for Boynton
Beach Park of Commerce~ As part of the required improvements, N.W.
22nd Ave will be four-Ianed from Seacrest Blvd. to Congress Avenue.
Right and left turn lanes would also be provided at the intersection
of High Ridge Road and N.W. 22nd Avenue and at he intersection of
Seacrest Blvd. with 22nd Avenue. If the interchange is constructed at
1-95 and N.W. 22nd Avenue, the developer would be required to 6-lane
22nd Avenue from Seacrest Blvd. to th center of the Park of Commerce,
and 4-1ane 22nd Avenue from Seacrest Blvd. to U.S. 1. These roadway
improvements would maintain a Level of Service "0'1 at the peak hour.
Access to the site from N~W. 22nd Avenue should be deleted since this
is part of the limited access right-af-way for Interstate 95, and
since this frontage is on the ramp leading to the 1-95 overpass (see
attached master plan). Furthermore, access to the site from the
relocated High Ridge Road should be limited to 2 driveways, in order
to allow for more efficient traffic flow along High Ridge Road.
There is an existing Florida Power and Light Company overhead power
line in a IOu foot-wide easement, occupying the eastern side of the
property~ This power line and easement will remain after the site is
dE~vel opr.-;:,>d.
e Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the
current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties, or
would affect the property values of adjacent and nearby
pr.oper~ties..
The office uses which are proposed for the subject property would be
compatible with the commercial, office, and industrial uses which will
be located in the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce. Because Interstate
95 provides a barrier between subject parcel and the single-family
neighborhood to the east of 1-95, the proposed use would not adversely
page 4
affect this residential area.
f. "Whether' the pnJpert y i '5 physi call y and economi call y
[jpvelopE:\.lJle undf.:?r t.l"le e.~.~isting :zonj.ng~ II
The property could be developed as a park in accordance with the
existing zoning" It is t.he desire of the City however, to exchange
the subject. parcel for a more suitable parcel located in the
northwestern corner of t.he Boynton Beach Park of Commerce.
g. "Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is
reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the City
as a whol e.. 'I
The proposed pce, together with the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce, is
intended to accomodate a regional market for office and industrial
floor space, as opposed to a neighborhood or City-wide market. The
market study for the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce has prOjected the
absorbtion rate for property in this development to be about 7 acres
per YG~ar- ~
h. "Whethf:':'r ther-e ar"€~ adequate si tes 81 sewher~e in the Ci ty for"
the proposed use, in districts where such use is alr-eady
allowed."
Curr-ently there are about. 500 acres of pr-operty in the City where
office buildings could be constructed, of which approximately 150
acres will be located in the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce. It is
antj.cipated, however, that about 300 of these 500 acres will be
developed for retail uses and hotels. Although there is adequate
acr-eage elsewhere in the City for office development, the Boynton
Beoch Par~ of Commerce and surrounding parcels is the only area of the
City which is suitable for- large scale office/industr-ial development~
GQQ~Ly~iQo~LB~~gmm~D~~tign~i The proposed use of pr-operty would be
compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity~
Office use would be a more suitable use for this property than park
use, since this is a highly visible location with good access" The
property which the City would acquIre in return would be more suitable
location for a park" Therefore, the Planning Department r-ecommends
th3t this land use amendment and r-ezoning request be appr-oved, subject
to the comments contained in this memorandum and the attached staff
comments. The Planning Department also recommends that the Planning
and Zoning Board and City Council make a finding that this land use
amendment and r-ezoning request is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
ca~~ ,.'~:-'mA~~~;;i~~:l~,__.._,-----
page 5
MEMORANDUM
10 June 1986
TO: TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD
Perry Cessna, Utilities Director
Rick Walke, Public Works Director
Charles Frederick, Recreation Director
Craig Grabeel, Assistant to the City Manager
James Rhoden, Fire Chief
Bud Howell, Building Official
Tom Clark, City Engineer
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Horticulturist
Lt. Dale Hammack, Police Department
William Cavanaugh, Fire Department
Bob Donovan, Building Department
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director
RE:
Amendment to Access Plan
PCD Center
Attached please find George Zimmerman's response to our
Board meeting on the referenced subject.
~
-~ {\, (~- .~
CARMEN S. ANN ATO
/bks
cc: Central File
Technical Review Board
c/o Carmen Annunziato, Continued
June 3, 1986
Page 2
Thank you for your consideration.
GZ:aem
Enclosures
CC: Mr. Edward B. Deutsch
Steven W. Deutsch, Esquire
Mr. Roy Barden
Mr. James Zook, Kimley-Horn
AN
ING
- -y ~-\'-
-
lWj)~
J
~c ~"'
~ ..
-~
-
o
U'l
I"'l
~
. .
= !)
= U
." -.
.{J
IJJ
[J
/{JJ
!l
11/
e
a
e
~ "
~~~.-
-
o
'"
I"'l
1.......... ·
EXHIBIT "A"
REVISED ACCESS PLAN
6/3/86
PCD CENTER
N.W. 22ND AVENUE &
HIGH RIDGE ROAD