The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS J1 fL 1ft ~fcm ~ PLANNING AND ZONING TO: Jim Cherof MENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-487 FROM: Michael E. Haaq DATE: September 5, 1995 SUBJECT: Boynton Commons - >>nified . i city Attorltey..-AJl~roval) - File No. REZN 95-QQJ_-' Control Documents "- Find attached a draft copy of the above-referenced document for your review. Please ensure the document is in compliance with the City's Code of Ordinances. The document is being submitted in connection with a rezoning request. The property identified on the enclosed survey is being rezoned from C-3 to PCD. The rezoning request is being advertised for review by the Planning and Development Board on October 10, 1995, and the City Commission on October 17, 1995. The final document including appropriate exhibits and recording of same with Palm Beach County will not occur until the City Commission approves the rezoning and plat. The final version of the plat and master plan will not be of record until the applicant addresses comments and conditions approved by the City Commission. Therefore, we are requesting approval of the legal content of the document, excluding the exhibits, at this time. With regards to the review of the document, the Planning and Zoning Department believes the following concerns should be addressed: Include language that identifies the land is zoned PCD. will 7.2 of Article VII cover future subdivisions of land within the Boynton Commons PCD? If not language should be added. Exhibit "A" should be changed from the survey to the plat. Appropriate signatures should be on the document you approve. If you find our comments are appropriate please include them with your review. Upon your approval of the document please forward the document to the Director of Planning and Zoning. This department will hold the city approved document until the appropriate exhibits are added. The applicant will then have the responsibility to record the document and return a copy of same to the city. Thank you for your prompt response. ~:,t/c4 E. Haag Attachments AUG-31-'95 16:13 ID: LAW OFF ICE", TEL NO:407-241-0798 1I382 P01 SC~OEDER AND IARcm;:. P "A . ATTORNEYS AT LP.W ONE BOCA PLACE, SUITE 319 - ATRIUM 2255 GLADES ROAD BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33431-7383 TELHCOPIER (407) 241-0798 So~ RATON (407) 24L-0300 BROWARD (30~) 421-0878 ._.._.-,~"..- I ~- " '-;F ,':'i ,,;,~! \1 ~ li 1 , PLANNiNG AND .1 ZONiNG DEPT.__~' T~L2COP.IER TRANSMITTAL SHRRT BILLING NO, TE:LECOPY NO: TO: FROM: RE: 1025-05 (407) 375-;;;090 Mr. Mike H~g Michael A. Schroeder, Esq. Boynton Commons/PCD Rezoning Request August 31, 1995 VATE: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Per instructions frOO\ Mr. Lelonek at Land Design South, attached is a copy of Declaration of Easements, Restrictions and protective Covenants for the PCD Rezoning Request for Boynton commons. TOT~ NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS PAGE: 8 ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW: NO CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE Till! INFOllMATION COIfTAINED IN !!lIS ~AX TRANSMISSION IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDIDI'I'IAL INPORMATION INTENOI!t> ONLY l'I:>R THE U611 OP THB INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMBD ~BOV~.IF TIIR READB~ OF THIS TRANSMISSION IS NOT THIi: INTENDBD RBCIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY !l70'rIFIllP TllAT JtoNY DISSEMINI\TION, DI5TRIBU'l'ION OR COPYING OF THIS TRANSMISSION IS STRICTLY PROIIIBITBD, IF YOU HAVE MC'l!IVlID THIS TRANSMISSION IN BRROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIIIY US BY COLLECT 'rIllLEPHONt:: CALI; MW RETURN 'IlIE ORIGINAL TRlINSMISSI0N TO US 1\T THE ADDRESS AllOW VIA t7. S. MIlIto, THANK YOU IF YOU DO NOT RBCEIVI ALL OF THE PAGES PLRASB CALL (407) 241-0300 As SOQhi: AS rogG-IRLB OUR TELECOPIBR NUMBER IS: (407) a41-07Sg AUG-31-'95 16:14 lD: LAW OFFICES TEL NO:407-241-0798 tl382 P02 PIlJEPAJaKD BY JUU) U~ TO I .%("0....... A. samoml:R, I:SQ. samomlUl. A:EI LAJltC'JIB, P.A. OD Boca. PLACB, stl'ID 319-A 22!l!l GLADBS ROAD Boca. RATON, FLORrDA 33431-7383 DBCLAJtA,TZ01'I OF BASB:IIB:1ftS, _STaZC'l'Z01'IS AND PItO'rBC'l':IVB COVIIHAB'l'S nus DECIoAJlATZO!l' OJ' IilASI1HIDl'l'S, ItlIS'1'It%C'r%ONS A1O) PItO'1'EC'l'ZVI!l CQVB:!I'A!lTS is ..de this _ day of , 1995, by BOYHT01'I OOMKOHS OORPORATZON, a Florida corporation (-Boynton Commons") whose ad4ress is 7040 W. Palmetto Park ROad, S~ite 302, Boca Raton, J'luri4a 33433 RIIC:I'l'ALS A. Boynton COlIIIaOns is the fee silllple o_e~ of cez-tain real property located in Boynton Be.ch, J'lori4a legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Property" or the "Shopping C~ter") aDd depicted on the Approved Kaster plan attached hereto as Exhibit .." (the "Kaster Plan"). B. Boynton COIlIIIlOns is <!evelopu..g the propert.y as a :c-etail Shopping CaD~er in accordance vi~h the Kas~er Plan. c. Boynton C..-ons desires to hereby establish certain easements and restrictions pertaining to the Property and otherwise pz-ovide for ita unified control. NOW. ....tablishss covenants, 'l'HDII:I!'OD. Boynton COIIIIIIOn. hereby declares and the following easements. restrictions and prote"tiVO!l HUG-31-'95 16:14 ID: LAW OFFICES TEL NO:407-241-0798 11382 P03 AJl.TICL:R I DB'B:IH:ITI:01f8 1.1 Declaration. Tbis Declaration of Basements, Restrictions aa4 ~roteCtive COveDaAtB. 1.2 BuildiD9 Areas. All thOlle portiena of the Shopping center (as hereinafter defined) an Which buildings are constructeO, or to be constructed, all in accordance with the Baster Plan. 1.3 Co_on Areas. TIle portion of the Shopping center. exclusive of the Building Are_, int_o.eo. for CQmIIICJJ. &110. non- exclusive use by the Respons~le Party, its successors, assigns, ea>ployees, agents, iDvitees, guests .....d t........ts. ....d its tenant. s ..uccelllllorlll, aSlIIignlll, ag_tlll, ea>p1oyee., inviteelll, guests .....d ..ubten.....t.., including, but not limited. eo, all entrClDcell, e;/l;;i,tll, drive_y.., roads, parking areas, parking lIPaCelll, 1II1d.ewa1kll, se,;vice drives, utilities, drainage .....0. storm wster runoff ClDd. retention facilities and. landscape area... as may now or in the future be locate4 on the shoppiag- Cater, or changed frcGl time to time by the RespoDlIIib1e Party. 1.. Re_sihle Partv. The owner of the property; provid.ed, however. that if suCh o~er shall transfer, conveyor grOUDd lease :i. te :i.nterest ;Ln GAy poJ."tion of the Prope&'ty in such .. lIUU1Der ... to create .ultip1C owucrll of tho p~ope~ty then tho pO~SOD owning the largest portioD (baaed an square footage) of the Property lIIhall be the -Reapoaeible Pa~ty-. AJI.'l'IM.. :1:1 PROPERTY 1:DB.J'll~ TO TRJ:l1 DEer '&D%LT:rOX upon ~e reQor4atiQn hereof, \:~ Shopping C"'~er sball be held, tranaferred. aDaumbere4, sold.. aQnveye4 an4 OQQ~pied., in whole or iD part. subject to this Deala:ration. The Shopping Center or alty J>ortiO'll- thereof. altd the ri!:fht. and obligations of the Rasponsible party provided in this De(!laration may be freely transferrable or l!u.8igned to another per80n or tmtity. No such transfer or assignment, however, shall eause any revoeation, ehaDge or addition to the provisions establillhed hy this Df!elaration. axcep~ as may he herein provided. 2 AUG-31-'95 16:15 ID: LA"I OFF] CES TEL NO:407-241-0798 11382 P04 ARTXCLIi: IXI gRANT OF KASKMERTS 3.~ vAbicular and p.~..triad Access. The Respon.ib~e party, ~t. successors, aS8~gns, eDP~oyees, agents, ~nvltees, guests and tenants and its tenant'u uueeeSBors, assigns, emp~oyees, agents, invitee,., guests and subtenants shall have .. perpetl.uil, non- exclusive ...s_ent for the purpose of vehicul..r and pedestrian i4gJ:'ess ~cl eg>:'esB, to ~d fJ:'C&, ove.., upon liUld across the entrances, exists, driveways and other common Areas. 3.2 Vehieula,. PllrkiDCl'. The Responsible Party, its SUCCeBSOlo'S, assi9Qs, .-ployees, agents, invitees, guests and ten~tD ~d its tenant'. .ucce.sor., ...igu8, employees, a98Dts, invitees, guests and subtenants sha~l bave: a perpetual, ,o.on- exe~usive eas~t for the puZ'pOse of vebicu1... parking, over, \l.pon &Dd aeros.. the parking area.. ....,11 parking upaeeu of the O""""on Are..... 3.3 D,=\.U.l:v Basements. '1'be 1l.esponsible Party shall have a perpetual, nQn-exo~usive easement for the purpose of instal~in9, operating, maintaining, repairing, replacing, renewing and tying iato ...y ...d. a~l utility li....s, dz'.in~. f.ci].:l.ti.. ...d ,.elat.d facilities, includtag surfaoe drainage rights, over, above, a~ong, under, in and aoro.. the Shopping Center wherever the.e utility lines or iaoilitie. may be loaated. .a.R.TJ:t!LJZ xv Ctmg~tJC'rJ:CH The :aespotLllible Party shall be rellpon8ible for the conlltruction of all uti1itiAII. parking arAas. drivAways. 1I.CCASS ways, roadways, sidewalks and walkwaya, llxitll and llntrancAS and other cammon Areas located in the Shopping center. n'l'1:~EV MILT1II1'I'1Z'ITa.W(!R The Responsible Party shall maintain in good repair lIlld condition all utilities, p~king areas, parking spaces, driveways. aoo..s ways, rQadways, sidewalks and walkwayst exits and entrances lIlld other Common Areas located in the Shopping Center. 3 HUG-01-'95 15:16 ID: LAW OFF1CES TEL NO:407-241-0798 11382 P05 llTICLB VJ: l:1I8tJRMiICE The Responsible party Shall ~tai~ an~ maintaia comp~ehensive geae~al liabiUty insu~lIJ1ce or (1) at least $1,000,000.00 witb respect to bodily injury or 4eath to any oae persoa, (ii) at least $2,000,000.00 with reapect to DOOily injury or 4eath arising out or any oae occurrence, an~ (iii) at leaSt $1,000,000.00 with respect to property d.amage arisiag' out of anyone occurrenc<<. aJlT'rCI.K V:I~ II:ESt2L T.. 'IilIWIWTS 7.1 "~~"''M'''nt and T8:rm.ination of Declaraticu.. Declaration may only ~e modified or rescinded, in wbole or by the Respoasible party, its successors or assigns. This ill part, 7 .2 Am.ndm.nt of 1II....t.r PlllD. Bothing herein ..hall be eonstrueel to p_..._t the Re8SlOlls:Lble party froaa _di"8' t.lle MelIter plan wi~o~t: ~. cons.nt: of any other party unless the cod. or ordinllDce.. of the City of BOyzatOl1 Beach require it.. consent i... which event tlw ...stezo I'laa ..h..ll not be _ended without having rirst 0I:tta1...ed. the oo....ent of tbe C:l.ty of Boyzaton BeaC!h. 7.3 eOv.llD~t:A R'Iu'lft11lCl' with ..h. L_n". Th. terms, conditioDs, covenants, rights anel Obligations contained within this Declaration .ball run with the Shopping Center lIDd all part. thereof and inure to and be for tlw benefit of the R.sponsiblo pazoty, :l.ts succe..ozo., ...igns, ~lo~.., .gent., 1n...it..., guests and tenants and its tenant'. .uooe..or., a..ign., employ..., .g....e., l...vltoo., SUe.es and .ubt~ant. for an inltlal e.~ o~...olDg wleh the daee ehls Dealaration i. recorded in tbe ~110 aeoor48 of p~ Beach Co~ty, ~lorida and continuing until Deceml:ter 31, 3025. Thi. Declarat:l.on shall .ut~t"Oll.lly !). _teAdeel for aMitiOA&l p4lr1oel. of ten (10) year. eaeh unle.. tar.m1nated. :1.11. wr:l.t:l.Dg ~ write.n agr....Dt Of the R..pon.ible party and all other OWner. of any portion or the Shopp:l.lI.9' C_t.er and filing of .ueh t.xmination in the Public: Reoor"s of Palm Beaeh COWI.ty, Florida prior to .uch data of extension. 7.4 Severability. In the event that any parI:, I:erm or provision of this Declaration shall becama illegal, null or void for any rlla.o~, or .hall bll hAld by a eourt of CCllllpAtllnt ;urisdietion to be so, the ramaining portions tberAof .bAll rAmain in full force and effect:. " RUG-31-'9S 16:16 ID: LRW OFFICES TEL NO:407-241-0798 11382 P06 7.5 Annlicable La". 'l'hb De~l.ratiOIa IIAll be governed by and construed in accordance "ith the laws of tbe State of ~lo~ida. 7.0 No Ded1cat:l.on. Not:.h1ng herein contained sball be deomod. to be a gi~t or dedication o~ ~ portion o~ the Sboppilag Center to ebs general pUbliC or ~or tne general public or for ~y pUblic pu~poses whatsoeve~, it being the intention Of the parties that tbis DeClaration shall be strictly limited to and ~or the purpo.e. herein expressed. KOreoVer, tbe Respolasible party reserve. tbe right to Clo.e of~ any pOrt10n of the cOIIIII\on Areas tor such reaSOnaDle periOd or time as may be legally necessary to prevent the acquisition of prescriptive rights by anyone. ZN Wt~SS WBBKBOF, Boynton cammons has execut:.ed this De~laration all o~ the ~y and year first above written. ao~.....o.. CO....ol'lS COKPOKA'1'tOIll, .. Flori~ corporation "ZTml:SS:S:S, By. Its, .rint Namo &a to wi~eaa p~iDt Naae aa to "itaeaa S'1'ATE OF FLORrDA ) ) 88. COVR'l'Y OF PAUl au,al) The foregoing instrument w.s acknowledged befo~e me OD , 1995, by , .s of BOYJn'OR ~ CORPORATXOIr. . I'lorida cozporation, on :behalf of the corpo~.tion. .e/sM is personally known to _\ha. prodl1Qed a. identifioation. print. Type or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary PUblic - State of Florida ~ Commission Expires. MY Commission HUmber. MY Notary Seal: 8;\7\CLiBNTS\BTt~~..\.0Y.N70Nl+DZC 1025-03 5 AUG-31-'95 16:17 ID: LAW OFFICES TEL NO:407-241-0798 11382 P07 BXBIBI'f -.a.- LBGAL DBSCRIPT1:01l 01' PROPERTY [TO I)e attaCneo.J HUG-31-'95 16:17 ID: LHtJ OFF ICES TEL 1-10: 407-241-0798 11382 P08 RXBIB%T -B- MAJilTIii:R PLAIl [TO be attach.d.] - /~,g,f'/ ~ U.J.!,/:C ~-[//.!-u"" ;7-t"',.< ;?iT..I~kt-:J +, 4,.y1""'1 ~"tJI:~ P>-<- 60r/!.,~Ih-v u..1I1o.A'"1,~"',1"f.- /Z;> ..L Tl:A_ ./,,- f..' "cd ,:)~.s, ,/ -:"N"'. LA.. "'_'- p'':;:: , ,...: '<>'r,,'''Y I,;. "..,r"" f'" ,I /. ~.., ~ ~U/.4/t.t)":O iV/aJ rr';." ~~ ~""4 A<K4,~ P ~tt-) ~I"''''''''''c. /},,). .~ #/ IV::; /v.t->r y,g-><- /A"")'C,-~1!:':),4d ~,'" (-.vir /?1vst--l3:! ,K'cc-;' /,jf,') , ~/<.- Y""" S4"o //1..4y4':: .,$",..., f!o ej1,,,, ~,,~,-......I~o ~,L A-//,.4>v'..,,{., /'r-lt- .4-;ni.'i:..d'J r /.l.d:; 4 Ctft J f "'.IlL ~,m W 71" r;:>~4) ;;is J'C;-u/V ~3 #<.. C:>->:""t'-..,JT", ,412<'., /AJ ~ W1hJit) Lt~~ /""'l" 10 ~~""'/$;v../ /l.JC4"\. t'5<-..,-p~ ::;: ~.... c' ~::';/1If,-l!L)I/U-i. .-1--'\," , ~""'V""-f.t.J(". I'f,LW,l,4..c. -~rA t---. ,P'!zf}~ #-;, L/ '1'7' ,} -1' t1,tJJff ,..l -m. IIrT4'c~D flOv, ~Jl\ . />>1 c':>h1t"'C<.I11- t4~ e~ 4-1.( 7?JE 77ec '0"'9,- _ _ _______ C:<;v>"-" €.",:1' F/I-Or1 h/<.. r ~Vl/i:<..v of &I'.vft./~ 4"7nlJN{,. ..:r .va,:; S/)m~ {)liO!3<.1i~,,> Ite<->"'. yo,,,- It..AI<:Ji"-";' PJ/fl<f/ CCldc1-rJ<:.Ntr SI!.tJ" t'ti :;,.11>"" "v 4;J>'IpD~.,-u- ",v f?-t- #1 /J/t/l. , fi?"''' IJt2A<PIMJ" etlce~ """ <P1'<> '1JJt p.,(j Be./Ji1,.,rC( I H~'s C.,.,...,~c:.n.1S Zi:;; ~J11'h. r~t.6. , /ct.-.t2S=.-pi.y U,.{6, c:::lt\. ~:z..(i,- 0i'I. ~ s..42. r;~ -Iff ,A.+- ~ --I;;I't C 0/ P +-.D fj"-Y ;"{ . /n~ EY'I~ n 5 F''<-"-<- (~"'\Y .cJas1~ -fr-~s sf'<$-'='J).. <(0' "'<:.. ~ /;c-'('I'Y\ .f'hrej~~ut fl.:'''' :J<'''''''-"Gd.'T . "1~ (("--~ -tk 'bf,c:-:3l-\) ~~~ G> i ,-I-t"", J'=-"'-- C",,( of- .. :t-P.,~ sd2 u; .r.....0 <eii.. '1'..... \1",,,, p~'-'...r'=\<-O. G--{'~. ~)i: :r~~_ cr-.. ~ {~"'T"'"- c...b.~ "!'Go"",.\.. ~~ \.....~ ,', (i''- i,i ? ~ If):! .:r ~i'o.-fe .,.Q; ........"'.l> ,QY> ,b<<= fZ.c:.c. '^- (t.... W~f S~~& "f jl/7~r' """6 -#- "> ,. c...e.~ <f p r"P"'-'+( (tne . -~~: 5~".IY-\~SD, Pfbv\k en ",4 01\<9.<;,9- c-'--v....~( ~.."... ) _,( I' 'J:'- J ? S 5..... r:'. ....o.;..l:;J~ I \ ',.."..1-...s.'-"':"?~ -f /J "I . ~;J(-r/.. ~ 5- blr;,,~t,.>'( """- C,--I;'l"--~(~ BLs 7) ;,! ~c;~;'f P'v','S,,<:,<Q M'P ~ .5.d1l' pn"br 16 FP,z.S"p. o....;~-r - --- ,'. D;((S ~ ./ E - c,;- /. 0'.) .(' II - \;l.s" f- tt..&,;J....... -<'-~'> It' C'c/Q"Y) .~c ""'s ,---_.--- ~ ? 'f). '-:<C~~i-U--..-- 'c-c.c:--Git"~~s -"~f-=.-n""AT rI.".f ",,1/ uhf; h<s. J6 & fv""-,,,J)~ .,j by W~c. ~',-~ k"'-r-~.........s.f *=(( ,Sfn..,~~-=s ,- . (\ :1,.",,'''7''''f5'-",->,\0''- <:;{",""'''''l>-~f 1Y'1f. ,p (~~v'-- ~~",c..-'( .:-.~ \J~_ 'f -- I.#j'~ ~,1L"'f"~ l",_~.(<<.>r- oJ c<;;k",-"~ ,,* c':<tc:l'S.<.o~."- -'< - ,,"~"-" '7 /S"(,,,..,',.t So -; lsil\~e:.5-f:JcC'h"" re f'",,~"\- ..JJ / rp T''\:> t<!./ i ",15oy('\r~ ~ (Y'-f1'(1..5 'PC:.:D ;Ud C<:N-~ [<!!:~ c) ;s""lt" Y"7"",f;0I\ 6"'(.Y~ S....e-.Q, ~_--p"- k-\>--C ~'a.. / t"-'l> . ~ - !t,-. frl'"" # ... .f.- a-t1 f~ 6...(.I)<!t-o/'-- u:sc;ke 1/0 ------ ~ I~ ~>,h~ c,....,..,""-\'15 C""'-f' OW~: u;",c:~s-iz:-{' I ,c\<::. ~ t':- Eo b 6"'",-\'<:- (~c..,.Q D,,-~. 50 _-f::.'" ~/)'~ C~.,.,.,."""s #(<1:.: 2-cL~-'>-( (.Jo-c'.,kr G/-r~e ..s~rv? ?<-('J-0 10 1:"&:15 a.f ~e;-"~~ rf5~~/>-?"'h..t' / e-'?v Sc4. ~ I/, Ary; l'\.Jt<c~~ +- 0 .~ ;Z <{. 71( ~ c. '{' <-,S. ftk-.>rd' f I<M- ;l'7d,('~t':J ~. aif:7-+f Su-""1 \~'c.,4""~,' .5<3.0'7 ( ~, r"!f1~ci/,\-:v~1 of ~/,(;c,-".q~ .) , , (Lr" I ;{ ,-1,0"(', <"<J--r,V'r- 1:, ;>., - Sft- n,J;)~ ht'Y1 u.v.Y ......, ??5C::o 4-. -rk....,., - (s~(6l /AL ~v;-sJ -to ~}J~<::. 1;?<3.::.. 0./ ,--'-,,,,-1' <:of 3ZSJ - M~ ~ .s.v.."'~r ,~I/p~fs <nc:.. ("'$;_ ..11 '--17'''' .76 ~ @' 5~r..H <iT C".,"_/"", ~ ,j,,~ I. '--;rr~..-ft ~ ho-f ifT5t.:'V~ _s a...,^~~ ctJa>iJP. s cJ2, :5 12... {-./.. t (.>'/0-.- "u<'./ <s f T.,.-", e ...$<-' rl/<:.1 . ( f~ ",-.Q ~ Iv K::,;:. f ;<.fJ. <"PtY<>-;J'~ /n-,,- /heY'.r h~I)'l '760/ b;,~J ~ elfe- r;-.f} /Jrfrr-fy G(.~ ..-(=-5 h.l( p~ (1(1<"< +>~ .( <!!fh'f r:.ycc-~ SJho-:f~e.s fr'tr"/VI. J O(,.Jh~5 .---<7 hu ,^ (fc ~ X. LEGAL A.3 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT HEMORANDl cc: Plan. Dev. Util cr'S- ,,"'1 Agenda Memorandum for November 21, 1995 City Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker, city Manager FROM: ~/-:r\) / Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director ~ DATE: November 16, 1995 SUBJECT: Boynton Commons PCD - File No. 95-003 Rezoning from C-3 to PCD Please place the above-referenced request on the November 21, 1995 City Commission meeting agenda under Legal - Ordinances, Second Reading. Please note that the City Attorney has not yet indicated whether final reading of this ordinance must be advertised can occur at this time given possible additional advertising requirements that may be necessary. DESCRIPTION: You will recall that the City Commission, on October 17, 1995, approved this request from Land Design, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, to rezone a 23.03 acre parcel from C-3 (Community commercial) to PCD (Planned Commercial Development). Then on November 7, 1995 the City Commission approved this request on first reading. The proposed planned commercial development is located at the southwest corner of Congress Avenue and old Boynton Road, and consists of 186,130 square feet of gross leasable floor area within five (5) bUildings with uses that may include a restaurant, office and other retail tenants. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached ordinance be approved on second reading, provided concurrence from the city Attorney is received. TJH:mr Attachment ~!seZ!,aCOMM2HO.AGM X. LEGAL 8.3 ...... ... .. cc: Planning PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-642 Agenda Memorandum for Noyember 7, 1995 City Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager Tambri J. Heyden ~ Planning and Zoning Director .."" FROM: DATE: Noyember 2, 1995 SUBJECT: Boynton Commons - File No. REZN 95-003 Rezoning from C-3 to PCD Please place the above-referenced request on the November 7, 1995 City commission agenda under Legal - Ordinances, First Reading. DESCRIPTION: You will recall that this request from Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, to rezone a 23.03 acre parcel from C-3 (Community Commercial) to PCD (Planned Commercial Development) was approved by Commission on October 17, .."" 1995. It is now reading to finalize through adoption of an ordinance. The property is located at the southwest corner of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road. The proposed use is a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) consisting of 186,130 square feet of gross .leasable floor area within five (5) buildings with uses that may include a restaurant, office and other retail tenants; some with drive-through windows (exempt from conditional use approval since specified at time of master plan) . RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached ordinance be approved on first reading. TJH:dim Attachment a:CCAgenMe.BOy .."" .."" X.LEGAL B.3 cc: Planning PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-642 Agenda Memorandum for November 7, 1995 City Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: Tambri J. HeYden~ Planning and Zoning Director DATE: November 2, 1995 SUBJECT: Boynton Commons - File No. REZN 95-003 Rezoning from C-3 to PCD Please place the above-referenced request on the November 7, 1995 City Commission agenda under Legal - Ordinances, First Reading. DESCRIPTION: You will recall that this request from Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, to rezone a 23.03 acre parcel from C-3 (Community Commercial) to PCD (Planned Commercial Development) was approved by Commission on October 17, 1995. It is now reading to finalize through adoption of an ordinance. The property is located at the southwest corner of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road. The proposed use is a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) consisting of 186,130 square feet of gross leasable floor area within five (5) buildings with uses that may include a restaurant, office and other retail tenants; some with drive-through windows (exempt from conditional use approval since specified at time of master plan) . RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached ordinance be approved on first reading. TJH:dim Attachment a:CCAgenMe.Boy C~f& PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-589 Agenda Memorandum for October 17, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker city Manager FROM: Tambri J. Heyden .1j.;J Planning and zoning Director DATE: October 11, 1995 SUBJECT: Boynton Commons - File No. LAAP 95-006 (landscape appeal to omit abutting property landscape strip and landscape material) please place the above-referenced request on the october 17, 1995 city commission agenda under Development Plans. DESCRIPTION: This is a request from Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation to appeal Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape code, Section 5.E. to omit a 2 1/2 foot wide landscape strip between the vehicle use area and the abutting property line at the southwest corner of the site. The site is located at the southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue. The request is submitted in connection with a rezoning and master plan approval for the subject property. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 7-0 vote, recommended approval subject to all staff comments (Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-568). TJH:dim Attachment Ill. CCAqLAAP Boy VI. PUBLIC HEARING B cc: Dev, Plan, Util PLANNING AND ZONING DEP MEMORANDUM NO. 95-:5810 Agenda Memorandum for October 17, 1995 city commission Meeting FROM: Carrie Parker city Manager --;?S/ Tambri J. Heyden /,/~ Planning and zoning Director TO: DATE: October 12, 1995 SUBJECT: Boynton Commons - File No. REZN 95-003 Rezoning from C-3 to PCD Please place the above-referenced request on the October 17, 1995 City Commission agenda under Public Hearing. DESCRIPTION: This is a request from Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons corporation, to rezone a 23.03 acre parcel (previously 24.74 acres as indicated in the application) be rezoned from C-3 (Community commercial) to PCD (planned Commercial Development) . The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road. The proposed use is a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) consisting of 186,130 square feet of gross leasable floor area within five (5) buildings with uses that may include a restaurant, office and other retail tenants; some with drive-through windows (exempt from conditional use approval since specified at time of master plan). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 7-0 vote, recommended approval subject to all staff comments (Public Works Memorandum dated August 25, 1995, Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-314 and 95-310, Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-571). With respect to the soils report and the master stormwater drainage plan that were submitted after the completion of the second review of the master plan, the Engineering Division has indicated that the soils report is acceptable, however the drainage plan must be certified by an engineer to verify that the plan meets code. Lastly, a discrepancy between the tabular total of gross leasable floor area and the total calculated when adding the subtotals indicated on the building footprints was noted. Therefore, it is recommended that this request be approved, subject to the above staff comments and to correction of the master plan discrepancy for a total gross floor area not to exceed 186,130 square feet. TJH:dim Attachment !I:CCAqEn!'le !Ioy -- .. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORJUJDUM NO. 9~-~b6 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board SUBJECT: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zon1ng DJ:,;.ctor M1chael E. Ha~vff cJ Zon1ng and S1te d listrator October 5, 1995 Boynton Commons - File No. REZN 9~-OOJ Rezoning from C-J to PCD ..., THROUGH: FROM: DATE: Introduct1on Land Desiqn South, agent for Boynton Commons corporation, is requestint] that a 23.03 acre parcel (prev1ously 24.74 acres as indicated in the application) be rezoned from C-3 (Community commercial) to PCD (Planned Commercial Development). The subject pl-operty 1S located at the southwest corner of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road (see EXlnb1 t "A" - locat1on map). The proposed use of this property 1S a Planned Commerc1al Development (PCD) consist1ng of 186,130 square feet of gross leasable floor area. specif1cally, th1S project is planned to inclUde five (5) buildings with uses that may 1nclude a restaurant, office and othel" l"eta1l tenants (see Exhibit "E" rezoning applicat10n and proposed master plan) . ..., Pursuant to the City'S Land Development Regulations (Chapter 2, Section 9.C.2), an analysis of this request need not include applicat10n of the criter1a within Section 9.C.7 (which in part, evaluates rezon1ngs for compatib1lity with adjacent land uses and land use patterns, changed or changing conditions, compat1bility with utility systems, and availability of alternative sites similarly zoned), as the proposed rezonJ.ng does not requ1re an amendment to the future land use map. Alternat1vely, this analys1s will emphasis the proposed master plan and the specif1c recommendation w1thin the Comprehensive Plan for Planned Commerc1al D1strict zoning. Adiacent Land Use and ZoninG The land uses and existing zc~ing in the surrounding area var1es and is presented in the table that follows: DIRECTION Nurth USE - Old Boynton H.tJ~l(l ZONI NG IlIa ..., F::trther IlOl"th - Boynton I,'e~tive C"ntel' (IJ.Htially built) (;-3 Ea~L - CUHgress AVPfltH' n/a Fal"t-he," east - Oak\\!()ud Sqt1a_n~ ~)Il()fipillg Ct'llt{-~r C-3 ~uuth - L. W. D. D. (L-2/.) C:",al Ilia Fartllpl' south - Developed I'e t;j iI, COUIIHe.1T ia I awl ut i I i ty uses [;-J, PII We~l - Winche~ter 1\11 k Buult'vanl Fal"t!IPI west - undeveloped plopprty AC Historv and Present Zon1no The subject property represented a portion of the ~o acre "Mall South" site which was annexed, reclassified and rezoned in June of 1992. Although the County's land use classification, CH/8 (commercial H1gh), accurately represented the lntens1ty ot adJacent land uses, the zoning, until annexed, reflected 1ts current vacant state, 1ncluding its use tOl' ..., the storage of livestock. OnC8 annexed, the property was reclassif1ed to Local Retail Commercial (pu~suant to the Comprehens1ve Plan Future Land USe Map), and zoned to C-:J, Commun1 ty Commel'C ial. The page 2 Memorandum No. 95-566 Boynton Commons File No. REZN 95-0U3 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element recommended (and still recommends) that th~arcels withJ.n Planning Area 7.f (see Consistency with comprehensive Plan), where possible, be zoned and developed as Planned Commercial Developments (PCD). Based on this recommendation, the previous applJ.cant/agent IKJ.lday & AssocJ.ates) stated that the sUbject property would be rezoned to rCD once a development plan is produced. The pl'oposed project and potential uses would be permJ.tted by tIle eXJ.sting C-3 zoning distl'J.ct and Local Retail Commercial land use c lass it icat ion. The proposed uses, J.n general, include a restaurant, office and various retail businesses. The following selected build1ng and site regulations apply to sites withJ.n the C-3 zoning dJ.strJ.ct: MJ.nJ.mum lot frontage MJ.nJ.mum lot area MaxJ.mum lot coverage (blulding) Minimum front yard MinJ.mum side yard (interior lots) MinJ.mum side yard I conlel- lots) MJ.n1mum rear yard MaxJ.mum structure heJ.ght 75 feet 1~,OOO feet 4U percent 20 feet None (see Notes a and bl 15 feet street side (see Note b) 20 feet (see Notes b and c) 4~ feet, not to exceed 4 storJ.es a. Whel'e l'ea'r access 18 not avaJ.lable from a public street or alley, a side yard ot not less than fifteen (15) feet shall be prOVided on one side. b. When abutting a res idential zone, side and/or rear yards shall be thirty (30) feet minJ.mum. c. Where rear yard access is available from a publiC street or alley, rear yard may be decreased by one-half the width of such street or alley, but in no case shall a rear yard be less than ten (10) feet. Off-street parking as set forth in Section 11.H hereinafter. Proposed Zonina AccordJ.ng to Chapter 2, Section 6.F.l of the City'S Land Development Regulations, the purpose of the PCD zoning district "J.S to provide a zoning classification for commel'cial developments that will bettel' satJ.sty current demands fOl- commerc1ally zoned lands by encouraging development which will reflect changes in the concepts and technology of land development and relate the development of land to the specJ.fic site, to conserve natural amenitJ.es and to allow for the mitigation of negatJ.ve J.mpacts which result from land development". ~f~~~~BOynton Commons Planned commercial Development consists of five (~) sJ.ngle-story buildJ.ngs which total 186,130 square feet of gross leasable floor area (see ExJllbit "B"- Pl'oposed master plan). The total floor area consists of a 59,OUO square foot multi-tenant building, an 87,500 square foot multJ.-tenant buildJ.ng, a 1,500 square foot restaurant, a 5,000 square foot bank, and a 15,930 square foot pharmacy. The multi-tenant building J.S currently proposed for retaJ.l uses. Access to the PCD J.S pl'ovided by fOUl' (4) ingl'ess/egl'ess driveways; two driveways onto Winchester Boulevard and two located on Congress Avenue. All driveways allow right and left turn J.n and out of the site with the exceptJ.on of the south drJ.veway on congress Avenue which 1S limited to right J.n and out. There are 979 park1ng spaces proposed on the master plan, and only nine hundred and thirty one are required for this site based on the planned 186,130 square feet of gross leasable floOl- area. The master plan indicates that the maximum heJ.ght of the project wJ.ll be 45 feet, which will include all architectural features as well as the c~ -- ... Page 3 Memorandum No. 95-566 Boynton Commons File No. REZN 95-003 ..., height of the clock tower (which is central to the parking area). The followlng is a comparison between the code-required criteria that apply to the deslgn of planned commel'cial developments and the proposed Boynton Commons PCD: b. c . d. e. PCD Desian Criteria a. Minlmum land area. The mlnimum land area for a planned commercial development shall be three (3) contiguous acres. Off-street loading. Every hospital, lnstltution, hotel or commercial building or simllar use requirlng the receipt or distrlbutlon by vehlcle of materials or merchandise shall have one (1) ott-street loadlng bay for each twenty-five thousand (:!5,OOO) square feet ot gl'OSS floOl' al'ea or fraction thereof. Off-street loading areas shall b.. des igned in such a manner as to screen from view at ground level, parked vehicles, a materlals handling facilities including compactors or dumpsters. For the purposes of this section, screenlng is defined as a solid stucco masonry wall painted on both sldes. Lot coverage. . The total groillld tloor area of all bUlldings and accessory structures shall not exceed forty (40) percent of the plot on WhlCh they are constructed. Open lot areas. All open portions of any lot shall have adequate gradlng and drainage and sllall be continuously mallltalned ln a dust- fl-ee condition by sui table landscaping with trees, shrubs or planted ground cover. The deslgn of such landscaplng and the meaSU1'es taken to ensure its maintenance shall be subject to the approval of the cornmunlty appearance board. Bovnton Commons 23.03 acre 8 reqlllred/ 8 provided ..., 18.55% 37.80'f, See landscape plan ..., +/- 82 Feet +/- 38 Feet +/- 45 Feet 10 feet ~\consistencv with Comprehensive Plan The comprehensive Plan contains site speciflc recommendations pertaining to, in part, annexation, setbacks, adJacent uses, and zoning. These recommendations are contalned within the Future Land Use Support Document, Section VIII. Land Use Problems and Opportunities which were adopted lnto the Plan by POllCY 1.17.3. According to Sectlon VIII, the subJect property is located within Planning Area 7.f (which consists of the undeveloped tracts on the east and west sides of Winchester Park Boulevard), in which "the City should encourage intensive commercial development". In addition, other requlrements or recommendations for Pldlllllllg Area 7.f, which apply to the subJect property, are indicated ln Planned commercial setbacJ;:s: development district Front yard Side yard Rear yard 40 feet 30 feet 40 feet f. Peripheral greenbelt. The project area shall be enclosed on all sides with the exception of accessways for traffic and treight by a landscaped greenbelt area with a minimum width ot ten (10) feet except when such property abuts a residential dlstrlct such greenbelt shall have a minimum width of twenty-five (25) feet. :J ..." Page 4 Memorandum No. 95-566 Boynton Commons File No. REZN 95-003 the following excerpt from Section VIII (7.f): ".. .the parcels be developed as planned zoning districts, where possible, or meet the intent of planning zoning district setbacks and greenbelt standards where not possible, that the City approve any Developments of Regional Impact (including areawide DRIs) for these parcels, and that development not exceed the capacity of public facilities which serve these parcels". Although this recommendation for PCD zoning is construed to apply to ~ndividual parcels within Area 7.h, l'athel- than the en~ al'ea as a whole, the proposed master plan would l.ot ",rcc.lude e ultimate unification (with respect to design) with the remaining undeveloped portion of Area 7.f (that portion west of Winchester Park Boulevard). Given that the majority of buildings are proposed for the north and south sides of the site, leaving the east and west ends open for access and visibility, the two sites can be easily unified or combined to produce a single commel-cial project which, in part, is consistent in design and appearance, and complimentary with respect to landscaping and traff~c or pedestrian circulation. It should be noted that this orientation of the multi-tenant buildings ~s attributed to specific _ futun" plans the developer has for tht?- adj acent undeveloped property'1::;. Planned Commercial DeveloDment standal'ds ~ "tA There are three .(3) standards listed in the Planned Commercial Development (PCD) regulations which deSC1"ibe criteria for evaluating the appropriateness of PCD zoning. The three (3) standards are as follows: 1. Relation to major transportation facilities. ~ ~ . utility extensions, StOl'm water mitigation and roadway improve- ments. 3. The physical character of the site. The following is an application of the three standards to the proposed l-ezon~ng : standard #1 - suggests that PCD's should be located where access to major roadways or other transportation facilities is afforded without creating or generating an unacceptable level of traffic along streets in residential areas or districts outside of the subject area. As previously stated, the project is bordered on the north by Old Boynton Road, on the west by Winchestel' Bouleval-d and on the east by Congl"eSS Avenue. The conclusion from the applicant's traffic consultant is that no roadway improvements are needed as a result of the proposed project. Palm Beach County reviewed the traffic report and made a determination that the project meets Traffic Performance standards (see Exhibit "C" - Palm Beach county Traffic determination). The proposed PCD does meet standal"d ;j 1. standard #2 - requires that utility services be available to the site and the property owner construct water and sewer service consistent with city l'egulations. The appl~cant is proposing to provide on-site drainage through a network of drainage structures located in grassed areas with the outfall emptying into a retention area located in the southwest portion of the project. The applicant is working with the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD) to culvert a portion of the adjacent L.W.D.D (L-24) Canal located in the southeast portion of the site. Based on the information submitted, it appears that the project can meet both the city's and regulatory agencies requirements for stormwater run- . off, which must be demonstrated in order to comply with staff comments VI' ~~he stormwater master Plalz1 was submitted after second review comments 1".-- wel'e completed; staff com ents al'e forthcoming). As indicated in Standard ;/1, Palm Beach COUI ty has determ~ned that the project complies ~1;:dI1_ruf h~~~ !t ~~ ~ - - page. 5 Memorandum No. 95-566 Boynton Commons File No. REZN 95-003 .."", with the ~equi~ements of the County Traffic Performance Standards, and furthe.rmore, staff has not requested additional off-site improvements. , t'O standa~d #3 - pertains to the environmental aspects of the site, and it should be noted that the city's Environmentalist/Forester has accepted the vegetation assessment l-epol-t submitted by the applicant. with respect to soil characteristics, no staff comments have been generated yet on the soils report which was also submitted after staff conducted its second/final review of the proposed master plan. However, the soils engineel'ing repor~. appeal-S to meet the minimum requil-ements as established within ~e Land Development Regulations. .1/q/l~1d.lJi J 4<0 ~ . conclusion/RecommendatiofJ. ,--~- 1 . . . . Staff recommends that this request (JII91Il"l.floynton Commons corporatio.1,1O for Planned Commercial Development zoning be appl'oved subject to ~t.ftaff comments in Exhibit "D" - Public Works Department Memol-andum dated August 25, 1995, Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-314 and No. 95- 310, and Panning and Zoning Depal'tment Memorandum No. 95-571. This l-ecommendat 'on is based on the fOllO~: 1. The pr ~ehez~ng ~'s "'con&stent with the Comprehensive Plan recommendation for Planned Commercial Development zoning as described for Planning Area 7.f within the Future Land Use Support Document, Se.ction VIII - Land Use Problems and Opportunities; .."", " The. design of the proposed PCD is in compliance with the design criteria established in the zoning code, subject to staff comments; 3. The proposed mastel' plan meets the cl-itel'ia represented by the three. standards for zoning property to PCD, subject to compliance with relevant staff comments (see Item #2); 4. The commercial uses allowed in a PCD district are consistent with uses allowed in the present C-3 zoning; and 5. The. proposed zoning, PCD, in general, is comparable to the existing zoning, C-3 (Community Commercial). MEH:mr xc; Central File .."", M!SX,B':DM~ R!P ..., -< E X H I BIT "A" c., lQCATlON M..,p BOYNTON COMMONS Iltl~.' )' (\" -d1j hi. Et I JJI "= aw" _ !illJ1fE~' . ;~- -'-- ;6);; [of ::~=..~~ III:I11J J1JI1'j I . ! . ..' . I .. J : 101701 L. D I-IJIr, J rq~~~-] aJ-;;;,1~rg "~<~"i'.:;- ~..';: ~H '. 1 f 11 ~']~' ~flrF~r! ,[~ r'; IJ! bUflr;J8J.. .... ~ ' 0' J;J~T"JfJtJ:dJlD; , ::I ,.i .- . -; H! IiJ!.IT I/[] I t;:1.acy TC~aEA.C::'" ----L /8Jrt: !.iL!)ii-H'1 U U /fIH+lrlJfltiJ.p _'... i I IiJr 1;~TIi;m!i LI Li S~ E I , I , r I 'x. I . I' "L.~<1.>::'!"!:"~~ jpO"D -' .. I [r2.. ~S) _ ~~-;---'l_. r',_ ~ < """"!~,,, I Iji "''''%'_,,," . ~J~g _ AG -11,1 . J I . . ..."."".....",d%1 . . H.' I · ., -' -.J '":';:;;'1~JW@ 1/ . , " "'1'I~'~:M' i:.:: fC::' '1"c~ . u ",.', J ." .::,c.?'c..;." -~ .. f- - , I. .. '- ~'- - !~ .....: - ' ~ -,...,....- u t:l 4J; ~ ,,;.,~ - ......-J - .-:-:- ! 10 ~ ~ '" ~ 't / l II) /I) III '( \!) ~ ~ '-1 R1A A .... ,; I I --~~ R3Jf -rl" 'fl ('r ',' , , - , r -'-, - . - .'. . . '.. . ... I' . 10-<J5 E X H I BIT "B" l CITY __' BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ... PLANNING & ZONING BOARD LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICATION This applica~ion mus~ be filled ou~ completely and accurately and ~ submi~~ed, ~ogether wi~h the materials listed in seation II below, in two (2) copies to the Planning Department. Incomplete applications will no~ be processed. Please Print Legibly or Type All Information. I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Project Name: BOYNTON COMMONS 2. Type of Application (check one) X a. Rezoning only b. Land Use Amendment Only c. Land Use Amendment and Rezoning 3. Date this application is accepted-(to be filled out by Plannin9 Department): .,., 4. Applicant's Name (person or business entity in whose name this application is made): Boynton Commons Corporation Address: 7040 Palmetto Park Road, #302 Boca Raton, FL 33433 Phone: ( 407) 482-8310 F1IX: (Zip Code) (407) 487-8724 S. Agent'S Name (person, if any, representing applicant): Robert A. Bentz/Land DesiRn South Address: 1280 North Congress Avenue, #215 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 . Phone: (407) 478-8501 F}U{: (zip Code) (407) 478-5012 .,., 6. Property OWner's (or Trustee's) Name: Bill Rav Winchester and F.Vd.. A. IJinrh",,"'r. hi" 'die Address: PO Drauer 1240 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 IZlp Code) FAX: Property O\~ner's (or Trustee's) Name: Winchester, Winchester, Zeiher & Schroeder, a Florida General Partnership One Lincoln Place, #301, 1900 Glades Rd, Boca Raton, PLANNING DEPARTMENT - APRIL 1991 FL 33431 - A: LandUse '7 '. (2) 7. Correspondence Address (if different than applicant or agent) I 1280 North COnQrPAR Av~nllP '71'; West Palm Beach, FL 33409 , *This is the address to which all agendas, letters, and other materials will be mailed. , 8. What is the applicant's interest in the subject parcell (owner, Buyer, Lessee, Builder, Developer, Contract Purchaser, etc.) Buyer/Developer 9. Street Address or Location of SUbject Parcell The Son I hwest corner of Old llov.nton Road and ConlZrp~~ AVpnll~ 10. Legal Description of Subject Parcell (See Survey) , . " 11. Area of SUbject Parcel (to the nearest hundredth U/100) of an acre) I 24,74 Acres , 12. 13. 14. 15. Current Zoning Districtl Proposed Zoning District: (;-3, Planned Commercial Development , Current Land Use Category I LRC (Local Retail) LRC (Local Retail) Proposed Land Use Category: 16. Intended Use of SUbject Parcel: Proposed retail ,dF!'VelOI',""nt with a 7,500 s.f. restaurant,' 5.000 s.f. bank. 16.000", f. I'hA...mA~y; and other in line retail users 17. Developer or Builderl Boynton Commons Corporation 10. Architeot! Marc Wiener 19. Landscape Architect: Robert A. Bentz/Land DesiRn South 20. site Planner: Land Desi~n South and More Wiener 21. civil Engineer: Joel Wantman/The Wantman Grouo 22. Traffic Engineerl Joseph Pollock/KimleY-lIorn & Assoc. 23. surveyor I Don Todd/Atlantic Caribbean MaooinR PLANNING DEPARTMENT - APRIL 1991 A: LandU.l!e /0 - .... 171 111. ~~TI9N FEES. Fees shall be paid at the time that the app oation 1. submitted, aoootdlng to the fees whioh have been adopted by ordinance ot resolution. The ilanning Pepa~tment will inform the applioant as to the fees which are required. All fees shall be paid by cheok, payable to the city of Boynton Beaoh. ...., IV. CERTIFICATION It I (We) understand that this application and all plans and papers submitted herewith become . part of the permanent records ot the Planning and zoning Board. (I) (We) hereby oertify that the above statements and any statements or showings 1n any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and belief. This application will not be aooepted unle.. signed aocording to tho instructions below. x .,t:t., ~ t' A.v/,-kt'h ('5k.r )< ~tl-4~'''' a~ signature of OWner(sl or Trustee, or Authori..d Principal if property is owned by a oorporation or other ~u.1nes. entity. 1~/? ~- ~ate . V. AUTHORIZATION OF AGENt ~ Robert A. Bentz/Land D~sign South Signature of ~uthoriled Agent 8/30/95 'Date j x above signed person .s (my) d to this application. f 'x S gn e 0 OWner I or Trustee, or AuthoriEed Principal if property is owned by a corpor.tion or other busine.. entity. 8- ..?(')-x> Date' .' , , ""'1 I P~~ING DEPARTMENT - APRIL 1991 ~ /1 ...:'.:- iN . i i i .. .- -~ \ ! tli~'i~lti.~m I I ., l~~~ ~!~j' i ~ ~~~!~~l~1 . ~li~l~hl~ I a.i3~ p ! i!~liliii \ 3\ I,i, I ! il I'n ' ! h llitl Q ! Ii , 1i i ! i! 3 , ~ I I \ \ 5C,f:cr ~~~Cr ccu e'/Cif::) jj~ ~~ J f ! I I I ,\ \ \ I I \ \ ~ '\ ~ I L+ F I ~ .....1..,.,.' .-..-..-..-- --..-.' - - - ..--. ~ p ."". , l~i\~l , I .~h II I ,11~J~ , \i \&J , ~q ~ I I ii\ii i .~~ ~\ 3 ~ ~ ~ 1 3 ~. ~ ~ fi~ : ~ ,~ . ii . i~ 'II': l!>j! l}~ II '9.; l~ '110: I ,- I ,~r;'i~ .J...... li- iC='I:~ ;-\ I ,t:=-I I' li==i ill .- !>e it \ ~., . ". , .: - 4 Old'" ..... '~;uj . - , .L l _ _ jG\I\\C~ ~---=:"';I~ .- - - - ..~.~~"" Ii ~l~ -,~--;~.-:;-:.._... ..-..-..--.- _..-- ~~'-_..-- ..-....-..--..-..- '-l--"- I III !S*~ i .,. '" I.l~..' ~alit ,111'1 '\1 \ ~.zo iii i"I II Ia 1 illI {,II ill i~r ~~;~ n ~ ~ n!! ~! li~~' .\i~~ !! km.m ,j;; f'- l :;: ~ <"I ' r I i \ r J t ' , r-'~' eOTN1~ C01"'~ -0 ~\III I: I ':, . ....oIOlD~lQn'o<Clml<lOC' !.. EO ! L~-!.....:-' ~': ~':' _'0<11"'. ,~ r-gJN.ll Uk -.-...- Il1C,",'" ..... .........~... ......,."'.... -. -,- ----_._------_._-_._-_._-_.._.,.~-~ --.-.------- '. '\ 1.2 -- ... ."., E X H I BIT "e" .., ..., ..., ~) f-J Board of County Commissioners Ken L. Foster, Chairman Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman Karen T, Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Maude Ford Lee ~p,~,.p~"i/Rrn " ., ' \5 O . , ..-" ..--'------. j 1-- ~. I I i c..,.J I 11005 ......~l vV County Administrator Robert Weisman PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. partment of Engineering and Public Works September 1, 1995 Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE: BOYNTON COMMONS Dear Ms. Heyden: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the revised traffic impact study for the project entitled Bovnton Commons, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The proposed project' wi 11 cons ist of 181,130 square feet of general retail and a 5,000 square foot drive-in bank. You will note that the size of the retail has been reduced from the 250,000 square feet addressed in the traffic impact study that you sent to this office. The proposed project will generate 6,684 daily trips. The build-out is 1996. The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the requirements of the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER ~fi~ Dan Weisberg, P.E. Senior Registered Civil Engineer cc. William Hukill, P.E., Director Boynton Beach Department of Development Joe Pollock, Kimley Horn File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review g:\user\dweisber\wp50\tps\boyn51 "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" @ Pflnl6d on rBCycltJd plilper Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florid.133416.1229 (407) 684-4000 j',/ ..., ...., ..., E X H I BIT "D" ..., .."" .. /5- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public works Director DATE: August 25, 1995 SUBJECT: site Plan - Boynton Commons - 2nd Review Dumpster location must be readdressed however concerns are minimal. If you have any questions please give me a call at 375-6201. E chorst Works Director xc: Central File. /0 'W' 'W' 'I , ...." m rn @ rn ~ WI rn,rn11 NlG 2 2 1995 ~ DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-314 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director ~/,~AfAm ~ukill, P.E. {,{{IlffEngl.neer FROM: DATE: August 22, 1995 RE: BOYNTON COMMONS - 2ND MASTER PLAN REVIEW We have completed our second review of subject master plan and have the following comments: From August 17 comments, the following are satisfied; G,U,V From August 17 comments, the following may be addressed in site plan and/or platting reviews; A,B,C,D,F,K,L,M,N,O,P,R, S,T,W,X From August 17 comments, the following must be resolved as condition of master plan approval; E,H,I,J,Q In addition, a soils investigation report must be submitted as part of this master plan review. Note: The applicant has agreed to supply curbs or curb stops at all parking stalls. WVH:ck C;BCOMMONS,MI'2 /7 ...." ...." ...", . . . DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-310 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director I~!~am ~ukill, P.E. Ir'~- EngJ.neer roJrn@rn~wrnrnl UlJ AUG I 8 /995 !EJ FROM: PLANNING AJiD \C.... ZONING DFPT ~7 DATE: August 17, 1995 RE: BOYNTON CONNORS - MASTER PLAN COMME~S We have completed our first review of subject master plan and have the following comments: A. Revise documents to reflect all comments. B. Provide proof of unity of title. C. Provide release from LWDD accepting pavement, etc. over easement. D. County road. entrance sign requires PBC approval & State road entrance sign requires FDOT approval. E. The master plan is subject to the provisions of Chapter 2 of the LDR Sec.9C, pg.2-S0. F. Provide Traffic Impact Analysis. Chap.2, Sec. 9C4h(5), pg.2-S5 and Chap.3, Sec.3S, pg.3-5 G. Specify the name, address, telephone number of the applicant's agent. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3D, pg.3-4 H. Provide a statement that all utilities are available and will be provided by appropriate agencies. Chap. 3, Art.IV, Sec.3P, pg.3-5 I. Show the locations of all temporary structures or permanent structures having a temporary use. Provide a statement outlining the temporary use and when they will be removed. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3R, pg.3-5 J. Provide a master stormwater management plan. Chap. 3, Art. IV, Sec.3T, pg.3-6 K. Site plan review and approval required. Chap.4, Sec.2, pg.4-1 L. County permits required for construction in Congress R.O.W. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24 and Chap.23, Art.II, Sec.H6, pg.23-9 M. Provide Certification by Developer'S Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes and standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-S N. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless otherwise approved. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5B, pg.6-8 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8 O. Locate all drainage easements. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.6B, pg. 6-9 P. Excavation and/or fill permits will be required. Chap.S, Art.I, Sec.2, pg.8-1 /~ -- -- ...., Engineering Division Memo No. 95-310 Re: Boynton Commons - Master Plan Comments August 17, 1995 Page #2 Q. R. S. T. u. v. w. x. WVH/ck C:BC'OMMONS.MPR Provide dumpster location & details, including drainage. Chap.7.5, Art.II, Sec.5J, pg.7.5-1B and Chap.9, Sec.10C3, pg.9-4 Photometrics must be approved for both pedestrian and parking lot lighting before building permit can be issued. Chap.23, Art.II, Ala, pg.23-6 Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls, radii, signs, landscaping, etc. must conform with City codes and standards. Chap.23, Art.II, pg.23-6 Concrete curb must conform to City standards. Chap.23, Art.IIE, pg.23-7 Major driveway must have 100' clear to 1st access aisle unless variance previously granted. Chap.23, Art.IIH5, pg.23-9 Number of driyeways may not exceed two on each street. Chap.23, Art.II, Sec.H7, pg.23-9 Parking stall minimum 18' long. Chap.23, Art.U,Il, pg.23-9 Provide fire lanes along front of all buildings. Chap.23, Art.II, Sec.M, pg.23-9 & 23-10 ...., , ...., ...., /7 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-571 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag S1te and Zoning Development Administrator DATE: October 4, 1995 SUBJECT: Boynton Commons - REZN 95-003 3rd Review Comments for Master Plan Approval to construct a 186,130 square foot reta1l complex on 23.03 acres of land in connect10n with a rezoning from C-3 to Planned Commercial Development (PCD). 1. On the master plan identify the minimum required landscape spec1fications for the follow1ng; landscape specifications 1-egarding grade ot material, installation requirements and hT1gat10n specif1cations. Also identify the location, specie and method of installation of lawn grass. Also identify specie, spacing or count and size of all landscape material (note; the size of the landscape material shall be consistent with the ffi1nimum size requirements identified 1n the landscape code and at least SOt of the total number of trees and hedges provided shall be identified as a native specie) . 2. Enhance the open space landscaping. The landscaping shown on the plan for the most part depicts required vehicle use area screening with the exception of the trees proposed for the entrances on Congress Avenue and Winchester Park Boulevard and some additional trees located in landscape islands in the parking area. It is recommended that the following additional landscaping be installed in the greenbelt: i. Maintain the required 40 foot on center spacing of the perimeter greenbelt trees along the existing rights-of- way. However, change the layout from one tree 40 foot on center to a grouping of three or four trees that have a medium or small classification as listed in the FPL brochure titled "Plant The Right Tree In The Right Place". The group1ng of trees will create a natul'al appearance. ii. Add to the perimeter greenbelt berms apprOXimately 24 to 30 inches above the adJacent sidewalk located in the r1ght-of-way. The berm does not have to be continuous, however, it will give some character to the streetscape. iii. Instead of installing the continuous hedge in a straight line meander the hedge within the 10 foot to 15 foot wide greenbelt. iv. speCify on the plan that sod or mulch will be installed over all al'eas not planted W1 th ground cover, trees and/or shrubs. 3. Sp8cify on the mastel' plan tIle final detel-minat10n of the landscape code appeal file number LAAP 95-006. 4. specify on the master plan the dimension between the west side of "Major #6" and the west property line. 5. Provide a copy of the City appl-o'led unif1ed control documents. 6. Dimension the w1dth of the south two-way driveway located on WinChester Boulevard (note; minimum width for two-way traffic .1S 20 feet). c/o ---- ---- Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-571 3rd Review Comments Boynton Commons REZN 95-003 7. Submission of a rectified master plan will be requlred to be submitted to the Plannlng and Zoning Department in triplicate prior to platting and site plan approval of the project. COlldlunli:i (;lHl cJf ~ ~ ~ ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT I1EMORANDUM NO. 9~-Sb2 TO: Carrie Parker, City Manager Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utrlitres Dept. Chiet Freld Insp. Robert Eichorst, Public Works Drrector John Wildner, Parks Superrntendent Bill cavanaugh, Fire preventron Officer Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department Al Newbold, Building Division William Hukill, Director of Department of Development Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Envrronmentalist .:t:>("-w FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director DATE: October 3, 1995 RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1st Review - New Site Plan Review Project - Boynton Commons Corporation Location - Southwest coroner of old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue Agent - Robert A. Bentz Land Desrgn South FEe No. - NWSP 95-009 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Site Plan Review approval for this project will be granted by the City Commrssion. To ensure that the project stays on line with the review time frame, I request that the plans and exhrbits be reviewed and formal written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on October 16. 1995. Do not return plans and exhibits. Retain same for the review of the amended plans (second review). Adhering to the folloWing review guidelines will promote a comprehensrve review and enable the applrcant to efficiently obtarn Technical Review Commrttee approval: . 1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete based on the submittal requrrements identified in Section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance. However, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and Zoning Department. 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. 4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shal1 identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. page 2 of 2 Boynton Commons CorporatIon To: TRC Members Re: Planning & Zoning Memo 95-562 5. When a TRC Member finds a code defIciency that is outsIde of hIs/her review responsibility, the comment and the specIfic code section may be Included in their revIew comments with the name of the approprIate TRC Member that is responSIble for the review specified. 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and they do not have any comments on the plans submItted for review and recommend the proJect be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the applicant. please include the name and phone number of the revIewer on thIS memo. MIchael E. Haag will be the PlannIng and Zoning Department staff member coordInatIng the 1st review ot the pl'oJect. The Planning and Zoning Department WIll send the applicant a cover letter WhICh includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission. When the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, they will distribute the plans WIth a cover memo to all TRC Members for review and approval. TJH:dim Attachment xc: (Memo Only) Floyd Jordan, Fire chief charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director Thomas Dettman, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Centl'al File . Ail&tREV.CQ~/TRC ~1888 .~ LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~J-------^-~~,,---,A...-.-/,,~_~,~A~,' .h~ Board of SupervlsOlS C. Stanley WeavfK KemlltDell John I. Whitworth III Sec18tarylManager William G. Winters Assistant Manager Richard S. Wheelihan Attom6y Perry & Schone, P.A. \,.:Q '....';--1 26. 13081 MILITARY TRAIL DELRAY BEACH, FLORIOA 33484 September 15, 1995 Ms. Suzanne M. Kruse, CMC/ AAE City Clerk City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Re: "BOYNTON COMMONS" - REZONING Dear Ms, Kruse: We thank you for the opportunity to comment on the referenced rezoning. We have no objections. Sincerely, LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT w~ -1~-- Richard S. Wheelihan Ass't. Manager RSW:jrna ....... -J~" ' \- f'" ~rD 'l.~ ."~~ '\)u ~.~ '3~)'i;\' "I ...,. " I. ~ ~ <: 'J,,-A ,.... _~'r,;:\\j\;"J C\ i,::r.~~(',t. Defray Beach & Boca Raton 498-5363 . BoynlDn Beach & West Palm Beach 737-3835 . FAX (407) 495-9694 rn @ rn ~ w ~ [";)' ----.J I,' !i " ,q ;; AUG: 11995 ;' i. i .' ~'" rn DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-331; PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT.I'1!'~ FROM: f~J/~mA. Parker, City Manager ~ Hukill, P.E., City Engineer TO: DATE: August 31, 1995 RE: BOYNTON COMMONS - BUFFER OBSERVATION The Schroeder August 30 letter is not only eloquent, it is reminiscent of the Bard of Avon himself who four hundred years or so ago authorized an entire play describing a great fuss over trivia which we now refer to as MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING. Mr. Schroeder does not seem to agree with the Planning and zoning Department interpretation of LDR Chapter 2, Section 6, paragraph 7f, page 2-56 which reads as follows: f. Peripheral greenbelt. The project area shall be enclosed on all sides with the exception of accessways for traffic and freight by a landscaped greenbelt area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet except when such property abuts a residential district such greenbelt shall have a minimum width of twenty-five (25) feet. His stated reasons for waiving this requirement are these: 1. The Developer is not acquiring the property that lies south of the southernmost ingress/egress point on Winchester Park Boulevard. Our comment: That is his choice, not the City's. Early drawings in fact did include that land. Whether or not he acquires that land is clearly his option, but has no bearing on the approvals he is seeking. 2. Since the Developer is not acquiring the property lying south of the ingress/egress point in question, the only way that the staff comment can be complied with is to relocate the ingress/egress point to the north. If this is done, it would also necessitate a relocation of the median cut in Winchester Park Boulevard. Our comment: This is identical to his comment Number 1, embellished with a median comment. Our response is therefore the same as in Number 1, embellished by reminding you that he located the driveways, not the city. 3. The agreement between the Developer and the Seller prohibits the Developer from taking any action which would deny direct access from the now existing ingress/egress point, along Winchester Park Boulevard, to the property lying to the south of that point, which is not included within the project. Our comment: Deyelopment Dept./Engineering Div. Memo No. 95-331 Re: Boynton Commons - Buffer Observation August 31, 1995 Page #2 A slight modification of his comment Number l which seems to claim that an agreement he has entered into totally without City participation somehow obligated us to certain action (s). His client apparently signed the agreement, not the City, and in fact it has not been offered to us for review. That is certainly proper, because we do not have an obligation to any condition of an agreement which we did not prepare, are not a party to, did not sign and have not even seen. 4. In view of the fact that the Developer does not own and is not acquiring the property lying to the south of the ingress/egress point in question and that the proposed plan reflects the location of landscaping "... on all sides with the exception of access ways for traffic ..." in the area in question, I believe the Plan complies with the applicable regulation. Our comment: This is another reiteration of comment Number 1, embellished with his interpretation of LDR Chapter 2, Section 6, paragraph 7f. Our response is therefore the same as Number 1, embellished by reminding you that every sentence in the LDR probably has more than one interpretation; and the simple purchase of an additional 10 feet of land south of the access road would provide greenbelt compliance. Summary: The applicant does not like Mr. Haag's determination of non-compliance with the 10'greenbelt requirements of the LDR. His reasons all center around his client's unilateral decision to limit his purchase. Conclusion: Mr. Haag has reasonably and correctly interpreted the LDR in this matter. Recommendation: Since there is no route of appeal through the Development Department or, for that matter, the City Manager's Office, I recommend that the applicant follow the procedure outlined in the LDR for pursuing appeals and variances. It is delineated in Chapter 2, Article 10, pages 2-93 thru 2-98, attached. WVH:ck attachment xc: James Cherof, City Attorney Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator C:B("OMMONS.BFR MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-271 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities Date: August 24, 1995 SUBJECT: Boynton Commons, Master Plan Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. The Utilities Department has no additional comments at this time. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella 11--- File I I / '/ I I / I I ! I I I I I ) i I \ \ I . I r I I I I 1\ 1\ \ , I, I ! i ! I ~J I I __.....l_ f- -1 - - ==--:-':-:::::':"-r .::~=:::-:::.:--==--'::-=--=---~----- --- - (I I / I I / I I I I , I , \ \ \ " '~ ~ <1 ~ Itl~ I:: ai ~ :::i:o:: :E OZ 0:5 -,n. i- 00:: ~e ...., ..., 0. a. +oJ ~ cu a. c. ti. (\) 0. c: o cu'l>cuoCUC:. . --clt 0 Cl 0 0 ",.!:: .. , :!:! _ , _ Gi--bD' ~__~ _:> ,~.. 0 -l'i! m ~ c ~~' > ~ -.--- ~~\~ ~~ 0 U D:~ _I ~ ZG c:r""'l: "-!-,-, , 1- / I i "";'w l..)~ ~0 ZL, c~t I'---I---J ~~ t---- C'Q alE t-- .. ti-t~ .,,"~~,-~ - d I_U - .. 'r.~ on ~ ~/ '- - ~ i l4!l I \ ~~. ~ l ! ~ I \N~~~ ~\~ ~ '''i ~ " ~ \ \ l\I "'" ~., N ~.l!l .l!l.l!lCUIDt><i 8 \l 1ii 1ii 1li 000 \l' '" -~ ,r ~J-L -~~ -'J ->\ \ Q ~ (--~.~~~----_.__. ------ r--- ! l'- I -, !I= IE If-- I I -'--, 1"- ~ 1.- ~?\, ~~ ~@ .I.,. \Sl '" L-= I, ,,- --~ r- _u I ,_______u : -. -- --- i I : I f'+'"'' , I IV/': I i I :-,=Ith r', ;'l~ t I : I: tlt~ I' - '-'T~-- l' I I I I , '-1- i , I ~ -. ~ . .. -',--' o~~/" - _____________ I -_._,----- - --.---..---.---.-- --~-- --==----=:::.::.::::.:::::::.::==== - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-152 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan - Boynton Commons DATE: August 23,1995 wO] ~. @~Lut~ ~i1 IUo~ l'~1 ! PUIl.i;-,qriG NW - ? : ZGf,;ii:G D:::PT. 1 , =-''''---~'-''''''-''''_o<-_,.,~.~.~j Adjustments must be made at various dumpster locations as previously discussed in reference to the above site. o ert Eichorst ublic Works Director RE/cr (D~ ~ @ ~ ~ w ~,fmi ,Uu !",':j 2 21995 ~ DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-314 ZONINGDEPT. TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director ~/JJAf~m Hukill, P.E. ~~gineer FROM: DATE: August 22, 1995 RE: BOYNTON COMMONS - 2ND MASTER PLAN REVIEW We have completed our second review of subject master plan and have the following comments: From August 17 comments, the following are satisfied; G,U,V From August 17 comments, the following may be addressed in site plan and/or platting reviews; A,B,C,D,F,K,L,M,N,O,P,R, S,T,W,X From August 17 comments, the following must be resolved as condition of master plan approval; E,H,I,J,Q In addition, a soils investigation report must be submitted as part of this master plan review. Note: The applicant has agreed to supply curbs or curb stops at all parking stalls. WVH:ck C:BCOMMONS.MP2 DATE: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wi_, .""" ,_",,,,,,art r August 22, 1995 ~L~NN\NG IINO IONING OEP!. - TO: FROM: TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wild=. ''"'' Suporint""'~tr August 22, 1995 RECREATION & PARKS MEMORANDUM NO. 95-382 ~ ~ @ ~ U I(lJ ~ID. n , il \ fi,UG2319951 ' PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Boynton Commons The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the master plan for Boynton Commons. There are no outstanding recreation related issues. We recommend this project continue through the normal review process. JW:cm 00 f' " ,.... I !~") "(!" , rn@~a~~r~ ie' ,! d, DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-331, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPI -l'1"l1-l-: TO: f~jj~mA. Parker, City Manager ~ Hukill, P.E., City Engineer FROM: DATE: August 31, 1995 ") tA fU -- J~< t"\.\ A- BUFFER OBSERV~ D~' l)cn- '1 ~ ~------- ----- RE: BOYNTON COMMONS ---"--- The Schroeder August 30 --letter is not only eloquent, it is reminiscent of the Bard of Avon himself who four hundred years or so ago authorized an entire play describing a great fuss over trivia which we now refer to as MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING. Mr. Schroeder does not seem to agree with the Planning and Zoning Department interpretation of LDR Chapter 2, Section 6, paragraph 7f, page 2-56 which reads as follows: f. peripheral greenbelt. The project area shall be enclosed on all sides with the exception of accessways for traffic and freight by a landscaped greenbelt area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet except when such property abuts a residential district such greenbelt shall have a minimum width of twenty-five (25) feet. His stated reasons for waiving this requirement are these: 1. The Developer is not acquiring the property that lies south of the southernmost ingress/egress point on Winchester Park Boulevard. ~ comment: That is his choice, not the City's. Early drawings in fact did include that land. Whether or not he acquires that land is clearly his option, but has no bearing on the approvals he is seeking. 2. Since the Developer is not acquiring the property lying south of the ingress/egress point in question, the only way that the staff comment can be complied with is to relocate the ingress/egress point to the north. If this is done, it would also necessitate a relocation of the median cut in Winchester Park Boulevard. Our comment: This is identical to his comment Number 1, embellished with a median comment. Our response is therefore the same as in Number 1, embellished by reminding you that he located the driveways, not the City. 3. The agreement between the Developer and the Seller prohibits the Developer from taking any action which would deny direct access from the now existing ingress/egress point, along Winchester Park Boulevard, to the property lying to the south of that point, which is not included within the project. Our comment: Development Dept./Engineering Div. Memo No. 95-331 Re: Boynton Commons - Buffer Observation August 31, 1995 Page *2 A slight modification of his comment Number 1 which seems to claim that an agreement he has entered into totally without City participation somehow obligated us to certain action (5). His client apparently signed the agreement, not the City, and in fact it has not been offered to us for review. That is certainly proper, because we do not have an obligation to any condition of an agreement which we did not prepare, are not a party to, did not sign and have not even seen. 4. In view of the fact that the Developer does not own and is not acquiring the property lying to the south of the ingress/egress point in question and that the proposed plan reflects the location of landscaping "... on all sides with the exception of access ways for traffic ..." in the area in question, 1 believe the Plan complies with the applicable regulation. Our comment: This is another reiteration of comment Number 1, embellished with his interpretation of LDR Chapter 2, Section 6, paragraph 7f. Our response is therefore the same as Number 1, embellished by reminding you that every sentence in the LDR probably has more than one interpretation; and the simple purchase of an additional 10 feet of land south of the access road would provide greenbelt compliance. Summary: The applicant does not like Mr. Haag's determination of non-compliance with the 10'greenbelt requirements of the LDR. His reasons all center around his client's unilateral decision to limit his purchase. Conclusion: Mr. Haag has reasonably and correctly interpreted the LDR in this matter. Recommendation: Since there is no route of appeal through the Development Department or, for that matter, the City Manager's Office, I recommend that the applicant follow the procedure outlined in the LDR for pursuing appeals and variances. It is delineated in Chapter 2, Article 10, pages 2-93 thru 2-98, attached. WVH:ck attachment xc: James Cherof, City Attorney Mike Haag, zoning/Site Administrator C:BCOMMONS.BFR PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-473 I.. .' 1\ 1\,,: !lii I....... ~. I ' ; 1 1\ TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Site and Zoning Development Administrator DATE: August 28, 1995 . "~ I\t-lv [IVt' '- l ~~v / J \~\" 'bll,Q SUBJECT: Boynton Commons - REZN 95-003 2nd Review Comments for Master Plan Approval to construct a 186,130 square foot retail complex on 23.03 acres of land 1n connection with a rezoning from C-3 to Planned Commercial Development (PCD). . ~I' '1.''> Please be advised of the following comments relative to the reV1ew of the Master Plan for the above-referenced project: . ASTER PLAN COMMENTS: f:"'tJ,JJ'V7 1. The final determination from Palm Beach County Traffic , - .~, ,~~:,' D,vl",n ,.goeding Cb. p"j." "..Ung 'h. ceo"ie p.""""" <1c" XV 1).fI ~ )'J'standards shall be on file with the city and l'eviewed by city . Y-,!,,1'~(.J>'\,\; staff prior to September 1,1995. r o/i"J "~I' (At/.. ~\l CA I 2. O'?Show on the master plan the location, size and type of all I\" _' -:--i. M" existing easements located on the property. Indicate on the ~ F~~" plan what your intentions are regarding retain1ng or omitting /. fJ~''''' the easements. [Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 6. F. 8. a. (2) (c) and Chapter 3 - Mastel- plan, Article IV, Sect10n 3.H.I. and L.] ~~9~~V~ "\~3. Label and show on the master plan the 10 foot wide per1meter ~\"' (l!:-tll,S"') peripheral greenbelt requil-ed south of the south ingress/ ~~i;~ l.~ \.~. egress located on W1.nchester Park Boulevard. [Land 'vYrJ -".>\yJ' ,ll J v >~ Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 6. F. 7. 'f) ..\,,~ (/:, tP 1'/ t. and F. 8. a. (2) ( d) ] ~V' ,~ e'+ ",' >T .r i~ 4. On the master plan identify the code required width and length ~ for regular and handicapped pal-king spaces. Indicate that the _ dimensions are typical through-out the drawing. Also ident1.fy j...'1"'" as typical the following parking lot control dimensions: r-1' ~j.'.j ;>;.) j1l~ I~} Of""U- ~(I~ ..vJM ,J!. 1.. Width of each ingress/egress. u,'> 1\l<:. \1>>' pF-1V~.rIF ii. Width of two-way access aisles. f AltrorJ ~,rt-(\l,/J~( iii. Width of one-way access aisles. l~ ~~ iv. Width of fire lanes. ~~~~ [City Standard Drawing B-90012 & B-90013] oil- 5. P>> LI'~ Indicate on the master plan that the total bUilding area identif1.ed on the plan is gross leasable tloor area. If the area identified is not gross leasable area provide documentation identifying the gross leasable floor al'ea including floor plans. [Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 11. H. 16. d. (2), (3) and City adopted handicapped code] 01'- 6. ft> ll/vO To properly identify the required setbacks indicate on the master plan whether the east, west or north side of the proj ect is the front of the property. [Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 6. F. 7. e.] NO f, Enhance the open space landscaping. The landscaping shown on /. . r the plan is for the most part required vehicle use area {A>f""',p screening with the exception of the trees proposed for the .............r<I entrances on congress Avenue and Winchester Park Boulevard and try- ,,)f flff" >~,.. ~ 11';'" .} ft" u:V' )il}'-v '-,,(.. t: pV it A.'f / ,~"1' (o!'" )v v' ., ,> ~~ ~ (.. .' { I ~) \ ~rl "r. 'I)" , \;. "ll'" }- ,/. (t. f" \)r /.\ '.\--.\ . i ((PI' v' I I some trees in the landsda~..J.s.l.andslocateQin nrea./' It ~s 'recommended that the following landscape material be installed in the greenbelt: Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-473 2nd Review Comments Boynton Commons REZN 95-003 \'\ ~~/ / ------ j '. \, \,,\ \',1, !. " , Ii i; the parking additional i. Maintain the 40 foot on center spacing of the perimeter ~ greenbelt trees along the existing rights-of-way. ~_\ieY~, change the layout from one tree 40 foot on c.:jf.AJVIJ 'u V center to~ three or four trees that have a small tA-J classif~cation as listed in the FPL - Plant The Right Tree In The Right Place document. The grouping of trees will create a natural appearance. According to the survey there is an existing utility .easement along Congress Avenue that may prohibit the planting of certa1n species ot trees in this area. ii. Add to the perimeter green belt berms approximately 24 to 30 inches above the adj acent sidewalk located 1n the right-of-way. The berm does not have to be continuous, however/give some character to the streetscape. :ri IjJ' {)... iii. Instead of installing the hedge 1n a straight line meander the hedge w1thin the 10 toot to 15 foot wide greenbelt. ( I \ ( ) iv. Specify on the plan that sod or mulch will be installed over all areas not planted with ground cover, trees and/or shrubs. _._-_._-~.- --- -'~opcn~-celandscaping shall be shown on the master plan and will be reviewed by the Planning and Development Board and City Commission. [Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 6. F. 7. d.] 8. Show, label and dimension on the master plan the location and .- 1.n screening for the e1ght required loading zones. Please refer I ~<- to Section J. of Chapter 2 Zoning of the City's Land L'v~ Development Regulations regarding min1mum size of a loading A~.A zone. Also refer to Section 10. C. of Chapter 9 - Community ~ ~.~~eSlgn Plan and Section 6. F. 7. b. of Chapter 2 - Zoning of yo" i)) the C1 ty' s Land Development Regulations regarding other specifications for loading zones. (City's Land Development Regulations, Sect10n 6. F. 7. b. of Chapter 2 - Zoning] oIl- o'f' 9. j?6:> L.J.ve oV- '10. fCu- L-"vi o'f- 11. pco (,'W ~ A~') 12. , '_I'v'''' or- u. 4.J"If ".1I>!dll(;::e ",- r ~YV' . < OD'" /.IV ,(J. V\v /'Jfl'" Lvv:- )f (l,:.1) t.... 'P A""'" "j"'--' -:.(a-- ;jJ I r1- Add a general note that all buildings are one story and do not have mezzanines. If the buildings have mezzanines and are multi-story indicate same on the plans and modify the number of parking spaces shown and parking data accordingly. Add a general note to the master plan indicating that the architectural design, material(s) and colors of each building shall match. Also add a general note indicating that the design of the site, building and all signage shall comply with the Community Design Plan. Add a general note to the master pIan indicating that all proposed uses shall be consistent with the requirements listed 1n the City'S Land Development Regulat1ons. Add a note to the master plan indicating that the project is subject to platting and site plan review prior to permitting. Provide data showing compliance with Land Development Regulation, Chapter 3 - Master Plan, Article IV, Section 3. M. regarding subsurface soil conditions and groundwater depth. Also, add a note to the master plan regarding subsurface soil conditions and groundwater depth as described 1n the \il:\ I'. I \' , \,' l h \!,' \. 11 , Page 3 Memorandum No. 95-473 2nd Review Comments Boynton Commons REZN 95-003 of' 14. y.1:C l\,f~ . 1r. ()'t " . ~\' ,: (y-JI:. , ~~It 16 . CJ!" (vV ~.r- p.A /1rf'J aforementioned code section. compliance with this comment is required prior to forwarding the request, however, the City Engineer may take the lead on compliance of this comment. Add a statement to the master plan that all utilities are available and will be provided by the appropriate agenCIes. Compliance with this comment is required prior to forwarding the request, however, the City Engineer and Utilities Department may take the lead on compliance of this comment. [Land Development Regulations, Chapter 3 Master Plan, Article IV, Section 3. P.] On the drawing titled "Section of Typical PCD Greenbelt", identify the location of the property line, public right-of- way and easements (where applicable). On the master plan identify the locatIon of the section drawing. Submit legal documents assuring unified control of the proposed PCD. The documents are subject to review by the city's legal staff and are required prior to the request moving forward. [Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 6. F. 3. and 8. a. (1)] 17. Find attached Exhibit "A", a punch list of items unresolved, regarding the rezoning applIcation. /'" '. ,,__,18)' ~ J ' r, v:d\if!: '--._ ('<vrN . ,.v I GiI'V'v ! 19. The number of interior parking spaces used to determine _~. -j 12",'" L~ interior green space and required trees ~ not correct. Amend ~, the plans accordingly. ,JUl. ",ft.' ,vv", M,...; 1T'-c(;\:zt<'~"-'''''''('t... ~p,..a:;; Submission of a rectified master plan will be required to be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department in triplicate prior to platting and site plan reVIew of the project. ~'f 20. Show on the master plan the correct west and east bound lane {l configuration of Congress Avenue at the proposed entrance to ,:i> (".J: the pro j ec t . OIL. 21. Wcov S~~"~'/ The survey indicates Parcel 5 is part of project, however the master plan does not include Parcel 5. Correct the survey and/or master plan accordingly. In conclusion, the applicant has agreed to modify the plans to show compliance with the comments made by staff relative to master plan approval. The applicant brought the amended (2nd submittal) plans to the August 22, 1995 TRC meeting. The outstanding comments from the review of the 2nd submittal plans will be hand corrected on two sets of control plans prior to the deadline date of legal notific- ation for the rezoning, which is September 1, 1995. The rezoning request is planned for a Planning and Development Board meeting of October 10, 1995 and the City Commission on October 17, 1995. MEH:dim Attachments xc: Central File a:2ColrIlBoy.Colll ~ &y!//(311 //If 11_ fJ1ie City of .....- $oynton $eacli 100 $. 'Boynton '1Jtadt '1JoukrNlTri P.O. 'Bo:t310 'Boynton'Beo&, ~ 33425.0310 City:JfJJfl: (407) 375-ti(J()() 1'JU: (407) 375-6090 August 16, 1995 Hs. Jennifer L. Horton, Project Hgr. Land Design South 1280 North Congress Avenue, #215 West Palm Beach. Florida 33409 RE: Boynton Co~ons - REZN 95-003 Comments on Application for Rezoning Dear Hs. Horton: A completeness review of your rezoning application was conducted which identified minor deficiencies (separate from the master plan) within the application which are to be corrected by September 1, 1995. Each comment i8 de8cribed below, numbered according to the corresponding application item number, and includes the recommended action to address the deficiency. '1'iI!' r.rC~ ,'V '- 'f> "i~'r;, ...,.,,11"'- The survey includes parcels(!;)and #~as part of the site; however. the respective deeds do not confirm similar ownership. If this is our oversight, this information can be clarified verbally (this issue has been communicated and is currently being researched by the surveyor); II.d. I t.. ".t,~. (2. oK ~(~fl/~i' 0I.d~ ~tuR 1'" I ~~.;' f)~ 'lI.t,;7'\ ~ ,\'1 .'./' t;.j.brl'" I , , I'> (61'''' II.c.ll IV./V. 't'" JI,~. e. 0"- tll~Q< ~ ." ~. The survey shows as "NOT INCLUDED" an area occupying the southwest corner of the site, which contradicts the inclusion of this property on the "conceptual master plan". Assuming that this portion is intended as part of the master pIan. the survey should be revised accordinglYi The application material excludes the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's/tax maps with the subject property encircled by the 400' marking. Please provide this office with two (2) copies of this map(s) which assists with verification of property owners by the City Clerk; The application has only been Signed by one of the owners, Hr. Winchester. As indicated under Section II.c.l, written consent must be provided by all owners when the property is controlled by joint or several owners. I would recommend that you submit either a revised signature page, or a letter endorsing the application signed by all owners of record; and Pursuant to master plan submittal requirements. Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 6(F)(8), applications for Planned Commercial Districts must include a market study indicating the market area and demand for the facilitie8 prop08ed (see attachment8 within cover Hemorandum #95-445). JitmeriuJ's (jauW4y w eIU {julfseream c I I dge 2 1/95-003 If you have any questions regarding these comments please contact me at 375-6260. Very truly yours, p~ -?t rr- Michael W. Rumpf, Senior Planner DILLI:BCOHCOHH.LI' TO: FROM: DATE: RE: ..,- DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-310 00 ~~~BO~~@ Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director I~J~am ~ukill, P.E. ~ Eng~neer PLANNING A.tiD \ C ZONING DfP, ~? August 17, 1995 BOYNTON COMMONS - MASTER PLAN COMMENTS We have completed our first review of subject master plan and have the following comments: A. B. C. D. r ~@ F. G. ~_")LJ.v.. -@ 7 -@) '(/~j0{' -0 K. L. M. N. o. P. Revise documents to reflect all comments. Provide proof of unity of title. Provide release from LWDD accepting pavement, etc. over easement. County road entrance sign requires PBC approval & State road entrance sign requires FDOT approval. The master plan is subject to the provisions of Chapter 2 of the LDR Sec.9C, pg.2-80. Provide Traffic Impact Analysis. Chap.2, Sec. 9C4h(5), pg.2-S5 and Chap.3, Sec.3S, pg.3-5 Specify the name, address, telephone number of the applicant's agent. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3D, pg.3-4 Provide a statement that all utilities are available and will be provided by appropriate agencies. Chap. 3, Art.IV, Sec.3P, pg.3-5 Show the locations of all temporary structures or permanent structures having a temporary use. Provide a statement outlining the temporary use and when they will be removed. Chap.3, Art.lv, Sec.3R, pg.3-5 Provide a master stormwater management plan. Chap. 3, Art.IV, Sec.3T, pg.3-6 Site plan review and approval required. Chap.4, Sec.2, pg.4-1 County permits required for construction in Congress R.O.W. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24 and Chap.23, Art.II, Sec.H6, pg.23-9 Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes and standards. Chap.6, ArLIV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.lIF, pg.23-8 Inlets must be in grassy areas unless otherwise approved. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5B, pg.6-8 and Chap.23, Art.lIF, pg.23-8 Locate all drainage easements. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.6B, pg.6-9 Excavation and/or fill permits will be required. Chap.S, Art.I, Sec.2, pg.8-1 Engineering Division Memo No. 95-310 Re: Boynton Commons - Master Plan Comments August 17, 1995 Page #2 r)&A;< ~~ (1.-4/1 f,,,q.1 \?;1 R. S. T. u. v. w. x. WVH/ck C:DroMMONS.MPR Provide dumpster location & details," including drainage': Chap.7.5, ArLII, Sec.5J, pg.7.5-18 and Chap.9, Sec.10C3; pg.9-4 Photometrics must be approved for both pedestrian and parking lot lighting before building permit can be issued. Chap.23, Art.II, Ala, pg.23-6 Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls, radii, signs, landscaping, etc. must conform with City codes and standards. Chap.23, Art.II, pg.23-6 Concrete curb must conform to City standards. Chap.23, Art.IIE, pg.23-7 Major driveway must have 100' clear to 1st access aisle unless variance previously granted. Chap.23, Art.IIH5, pg.23-9 Number of driveways may not exceed two on each street. Chap.23, Art.II, Sec.R7, pg.23-9 Parking stall minimum 18' long. Chap.23, Art.II,Il, pg.23-9 Provide fire lanes along front of all buildings. Chap.23, Art.II, Sec.M, pg.23-9 & 23-10 ~ iJ1U City of $oynton $eacli 100 'E.. 'Boynton 'Btadt 'Bou1efNU'lf P.O. 'Bo:{.310 'Boynton 'B~ 1foriQa 33425.0310 City!1f4{[: (407) 375-6000 !TfV(: (407) 37~ August 16, 1995 Ms. Jennifer L. Morton, Project Mgr. Land Design South 1280 North Congress Avenue, #215 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 RE: Boynton Commons - REZN 95-003 Comments on Application for Rezoning Dear Ms. Morton: A completeness review of your rezoning application was conducted which identified minor deficiencies (separate from the master plan) within the application which are to be corrected by September 1, 1995. Each comment is described below, numbered according to the corresponding application item number, and includes the recommended action to address the deficiency. II.d. II.d. II.f. II.c.11 IV./v. Other "\- c' The survey includes parcels #4 and #5 as part of the site; however, the respective deeds do not confirm similar ownership. If this is our oversight, this information can be clarified verbally (this issue has been communicated and is currently being researched by the surveyor); The survey shows as "NOT INCLUDED" an area occupying the southwest corner of the site, which contradicts the inclusion of this property on the "conceptual master plan". Assuming that this portion is intended as part of the master plan, the survey should be revised accordingly; The application material excludes the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's/tax maps with the subject property encircled by the 400' marking. Please provide this office with two (2) copies of this map(s) which assists with verification of property owners by the City Clerk; The application has only been signed by one of the owners, Mr. Winchester. As indicated under Section II.c.l, written consent must be provided by all owners when the property is controlled by joint or several owners. I would recommend that you submit either a revised signature page, or a letter endorsing the application signed by all owners of record; and Pursuant to master plan submittal requirements, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 6(F)(8), applications for Planned Commercial Districts must include a market study indicating the market area and demand for the facilities proposed (see attachments within cover Memorandum #95-445). ~merica's {jateway to t~ {julfstream ~ , Page 2 #95-003 If you have any questions regarding these comments please contact me at 375-6260. Very truly yours, ~~ ~ ,;-/- Michael W. Rumpf, Senior Planner DILL1:BCOMCOKM.LIT 1'", ~~.:t PARKIl'l1 REQUIRED 2'08"W 35.64' RETAIL Ii S/lOO0 5F 1 T~T^L 11./11-\ I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I~ I I I I I )' y/ ~ L ~~~~0 , 31~OO 42,600 20;;00 13?OO 1~,€f8 5.000 1,~0 . 2,4.030.' <., I'IAJU1'< OJ H.AJOR '4 MAJOR '5 MAJOR ~ MAJOR ., MAJOR '8 RET AIL a1TeAJILD!~ 't (Pl-\AFt1ACr) I"IIT):\I "Lnl~v.. " \.I\.II~I V j"'-J . OUTBUILDIN6 '3 BUILDING AREA TOTAL I ). 7 I I " 1~3b SP. 1)% SF. F ARKItr3 PROVIDED MAIN CENTER RE6ULAR HANDICAP TOTAL LOAD~ RECOIRED LOADI~ PROVIDED MAXIMlt1 LOT COVERAGE MAXIMUM BUILDING I-lEIGI.n EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING EXlS ilNG LANDUSE FROFOSED LANDUSE 1}10SP. 26 lt3b 10 Sf, 105P. 40% 4&' C.3 feD lRC L~ f!:,oy~{JT~~ TECHNICAL COMMITTEE i ,$(' .5oe 1'\ rTfJ)l..... . FOR _ PLAN REVIEW - # Bldg. Dept ~08te <7 /!;/,i 'm~o Date 1S~ ,Fin~ Dept. A 0t~ Date q ,<) r r,<;. ll. '.'L tJilf: Date ft.1.[QCZ&( tlt .:W,-t,(ft4(:t~ , U ,I. LJ~i'L ~~/_ Pate 'IiS'!f5,. ~ ! · ~~:.@~~~~7~ , . ~\'y f-~a~~t-t-::.~. Da\MiI1 ........~.~ .~~~~~~~_. ! F-ec U'r. tJjlJ:- OOatll e ~ rn I . Fa, "",..or ! t~~f~ Jl 'lA 995 I I I I I , I DEVELOPMENT TEAM DEVELOPER &URvEY OR BOrNT~ ~ INC. ATLANTIC CARIBEAN 1041) W. PALMETO FK F4). 5TE. 302 3&1 llANA DR BOCA RATON.( FL. 33433 WE&T PALM BO-\., Fl 334\5 (4~1) 482 -8jl~ (401) 681-S898 ENGINEER LAND5CAFE AROIITECT llJANTMAN 6RCM' LAND DESIGN 5OUTl-l 8903 6LADE5 RD. 5TE, L.~m 1280 N. COt--tisRESS STE. :.>15 BOCA RATON, FL. 33434 W. PALM BEACI;1 FL. 3340~ (401) 4B2 -BB5>5> (401) 418-85>1(.11 I I , I LOCATION MAP l~' I~~" . ;~'Cahl-. a~1l: ~~ ~., _ -'-.._ ~ lIu~__:_'_h__.C..J6__ 'r. - ., .IIoiIR....."-r;;,_.~., II 'l;, ' , __ . -'-- ._---- -'--- - .---......... . .. . . .., . . . . . ., ., :::.Si~.j~~.:~ :"-l = :LU :.. ~ "nd~'~'~" ." ..,~~~...='~.. UJ ~ . ...." "P~.~:tS..~.. : ~~.... ~ .._~.:..".:~~.t;i-. '<( ,~ 'u M ts, .....~.~].....,..1l'I.. , 5:~ .. ...;. ..~iw.;p.ij.. . ...~.....,~t~,J....L... : : ; : : I . , . . . . ...~ ...:;-.." -1" - .} . -:;-.... . .. . . . . , . . . . . . . .. ..........,..... . P.', ....... , . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . , . . EFIEF . . , , , . . . . . .....;..,..t.....:.....-~_....;..... . .., ., .. . . , .,-.; ;. ...,;... .;......;..... . , .... '.P 'n ..~ l u .... .....- . . . . . . . , . .. -,-' . .. .:-,... .t.. ....'. . ....'... ...-.:. ... '.' .. _I ~~ t--- ill U- \- ~ W<J)-1 ~ ~,~JL.@~ O[ U ~ <0 f .. -ZOO Ot5~ E~u! a 2 - I ;; ~ ~, BUILDING DIVISION August 16, 1995 rn~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 95-300 To: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Direct From: Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Re: Boynton Commons - Winchester Property 25 Acre Commercial Tract - Southwest corner Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Beach Blvd. After reviewing the documents for the Master Plan for the above project, the Building Division has no comments other than that handicap parking and other requirements, as well as signs, should be addressed at Site Plan time. ~~~ ~ Al Ne bo d AN:mh Att. Plans cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director A:BCOMMONS.TRC PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-144 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Department FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUB}: Site Plan - Boynton Commons DATE: August 16, 1995 The Public Works Department is unable to make comments on the above site until the dumpster locations are shown. If you have any questions please give me a call at 375-6201. obert Eichorst ublic Works Director RE/cr "~-.. .---..,..... -,~- i ~ r' ;":"f'Ql ~. ;'.~ I i,I ,I 'J iI' " I~! ,!;'~ I 71 "-''''-., ,Y FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-324 WDC August 16, 1995 00 m@rnowrnf~ ~ 1 " , AUG I 61~N5 ,r!, TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department Pt)"':i ,,-'~: -i\. C .~:> SUBJ: REZN 95-003 New Master Plan Boynton Commons Congress Ave & old Boynton Rd We have no objections to this concept. Roads, access, etc. will be addressed with the Site Plan. 7/1 /L4~a~ Will am D. cavanaugh, FPO cc: Chief Jordan Steve campbell, FPO II File RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-372 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~ "rr yt FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist RE: Boynton Commons - Master Plan DATE: August IS, 1995 I. The applicant should provide a written comment as to which trees shown will be preserved, relocated, or removed and replaced with new trees. The large Banyan trees and Slash Pine trees are the specific desirable trees which should be addressed by the comment. 2. Any public road medians which contain grass areas would have to be landscaped by the applicant. A comment that these areas do llil1 exist would meet this comment. The project should continue fOlWard on the nonnal review process. KH:ad ill rn@ffiQ~J~rnI AUG I 51995 lWI PLANNING IiNO \ '---- ZONING DEPT. -/ MEMORANDUM Uti1itiC& t# 95-254 i" ~ i~~/"' ___~ ,./In r-~[J ~! !\' ::; I ~fr:1 !.ff.. "........:....,,/;.' iI...JU1 / , ;:; ! I < '5'" .,/i 1'" ,,- 'I.! ~ ",J ..j' PL4NNIN i '-' I "~1[) ..../ -____. I TO: Tambri 1, Heyden, Planning & Z' ector \ John A. Guidry, ~ Director ofUtilities\j August 14, 1995 FROM: Date: SUBJECT: BOyJJton CommoQII, New Muter Plm, Fint Ill:View 1. The water and sewer demands for the proposed project, ai submitted, are not correct. General Commercial should be 247,500 sf @ 0.125 gpdlsf= 30,938 gpd Ilnd Restauri\l1t should be 200 sean @ 44gpdlllCat = 8,800 llpd for a total of 39,738 gpd., (Sec. 26.34). (ptlJ jA~ n~J? 0 .~[ Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 2. Gravity Sa.nrtlll)' Sewer mains shaI1 have an easement ora minimum of 12 feort or twice the depth whichever ii greater. The proposed sanitary sewer main for the south side orth.. proposed project applNIr5 to be on or near the existing LWDD easement. Clear unencumbered aCQ:ss to Utility Maine and their easements must be provided, (Sec. 26.33 ea) and (b)). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed thrtJ\Jgh the review procen. NDNt- If you have any questions regardin~ this subjtct. please contact Skip Milor lit 375-6407 or Peter Mauella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde .Skip. Milor P.tec Ma:zzellll i.Jv" File ~~ ~q, v\[.J<- / ~'f / ?Ij) I. ;f< b {--- ~ ----rf; C( A ~-< J'f:c () u CI,v & -nJ-t:' !0 Z-c () I -n-Jt:: f/lOJ15:t:-' ,AfMo'<. {)~ ~~ dt../. 7<.( Ac..fk0 tit:, dt9.;}.f ..J-C/?.-f'J 7!JIJ C,JAuC,J: {'?1/Jj C<1vS.!- .1-fJflO!J(tA ~ CT1!~", ,tJf:,J.o(,AJi- /1<,) /YlAICI,v6 ,rv",- If I I J /'-d~ jJ,d1JI/>I~ ,A 0 tf..w ~s~.... Pt..r.., to &0 k~M ~II.--- ;Ct:1'-iIJIN6 ~~4c~ I {) <f/I~o BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 9 AUGUST 95 BOYNTON COMMONS MEMO #0157 I have reviewed the above plans and ob.~lY~tl1e'f9ll~lng:"" I. The entrance/exit o~ Old Bo~~~~~Ql\4is ~pproxi~t~;270 fe~t west. of Congress Ave. Il appears to be all nght99 thrs~p1Il.I1S but I'm notSUfC how \!~,ilhgns WIth the current entrance/exit to the Cin,lih Ci(yILonghorns Stcakhouse p!;1il\;/'This may be a traffic problem, as traffic wilf"b~brossing Old Boynton Road (ttOl1fiill!d south direction). ~~ ~/~~ .'", ,". "., 2. The entrance/exitKifthe'plans projected for Congress Ave,'~p~~s to align with Oakwood Square eniran6e/exit. This area will require instaIilitwbiof a traffic signal. i: .:..........' :ii- ,. .,. Sgt. Marlon Harris ::'=: .,' ~ .,....... PRUJJ;;C'l' 'l'I'l'LE: DESCRIPTION: '1'YPE: DN!'E REC' D: TRACKIN .OG - SITE PLAN REVIEW SUI TTAL FILE NO. :REZN 95-003 BOYNTON COMMONS Rezoning from C-3 to LRC NEW SITE PLAN 7-24-95 AMOUNT: MAJUR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION $1,500.00 RECEIPT NO.: 10314 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: CULORED ELEVATluNS REC'D: (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & Zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The Planning Dept. set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCEPTED 1 DENIED DATE: DATE OF LETTER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DATE: DATE: DENIED DA'I'E UF SUBMITTAL ACCEP'l'ANCE LET'I'ER: REVIEWER'S NAME: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Label TRC Departments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBEk 818 . OF MEMO SEN'r TU DATE SEN'I': RETURN DATE: TRC TO 8J~ PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. t- t.J ,~<.. MEMO NUMBE : ~ 1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED util. P.W. Parks t'ire Police 0,1-<. '!'YPE; ~ l~!; ...t25._"1-/ i OF VAk.LANCE(S) / Hell / --6.. /- / -==- /~ /~ Planning Building Engineer Engineer Forestel- PLANS Y Y =l= J;1EMO.it. ~D E / "C" '1S-- ~/ I /~ - 7)/ 'a.- /- / /~ ~ 10 I~/L::/ :S-',:) 7:1 /~/ c..... . fi.,,"'~ DATE UF MEETINC;; ~ J?,(y$l TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: & checklist sent out wi comments) DA'I'E OF LETTER SENT Tu APPLICAN'l' IDENTIFYING (Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLURED ELEVATIONS REC I D : MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW. DATE SENT: MEMO #: RETURN DATE: 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL PLANS MEMO # / DATE /"\,/0" PLANS MEMO # / DATE /"R/D" util. I / Planning I / P.W. I / Buildinq ~S-. VI{ / / Parks / / Engineer I 1I/:;;J.. I {\./ Fire / / Engineer I / Police / / Forster / / LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED: I'Ibu /'f SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD ~Lf~ ~?/97J DEVELOPMENT SIGNS ,NuU. ::11 CC/CRA~'f!"~/f '!J DA'I'E APPRUVAL LE'I'TER SENT: A:TRACKING.l:>P ~ . ~) i .......,.. ~ v- ~ .,,,", 3...... '1;..- ~ C r< -- \7 \ , (l'\ '" ~) (~, _I " \'$ <,,\ <>. <>- ~ .- \ ~ '~ \{ ';, \ -'~T-' \ '\ ~~..\ \ . ,\ \\ . \ , ~\,l __ \ , c, ._ ~ .., :,\'('l.- ~~- \ -- .-.;-- \ \ \~l \ - ---\~\>- - '" . -' :;" ---- l> 1, _______ \:.. ~- r' \ ~ I~O ' () ~ \ \ -- -- -- \ .~ --- ~ n ~. >-- -r - ---\ \ " ~-' -,; -~,-:\ ""\ . ----\. 1\.. \ -'-.,." -*~.c-",""?"'\ \ @:;:-\<<, "::~ - ~"'\' . (j) N N .--:::::2h\ ~ 0 , \ \ ' '.>, 0 '1' .~ <"'_ =-- . \ \\\ .-~~ , ~-, ~,..,:- . ," \" " '~\... ~. ~"_.\ '. \ '-" '" \ '2---', , ~,' \ ~ \ .' \ \ ,. . ~- ..-: ,I": \ \ --. -- , ) " ';l " \6, __I J:) \ - L0 <:.J \ \ \ .~ ./' j' , \ -------- - .------.,.--- I _. ~-_.... e~ .. ;;.:~-.=-::: :::: ~:.~~ ..I ~ -:J\ ~ --\~I ~ Ul ~ Z ~ o '\ t\\. ' ~ \ \ ~ 5 ~ .~ . ~O:l \.~~:-- / P 1--95 FRI SE - 40747e50~2 9:26 V (\J ESIGN SOUTH .E_ ~ .t " } 01, ~ m ~ "'. ~ . #'" 1-, .. ... ... .... -.:-. "d.~ ~1- I .>' --- " " -I; <fI . 1 'J 115 ~ " IV) ~ Ol '0 hI 'Sf'" ""- ~ '''.~1 ..."". ~ ~80)9090a~>~~~ ~~ >f~trd 6.J1S3H:JNIM 't 'r~t ;l' '-- . ~ --. '" ~@) ,. l~l .. ~.;' '.( I. q;.... ....' ~ ,.rt;: ~'\ ',~ I -+ : \,() t -- ....1 t) ! '{ fo....CU - , .' , . <l , 6l\<.J IQ...L . <t ~b 00- \ P..03 ~~--- .-." I "jf"'l ~j ;11 -L -..;; I " ! 'f ~.f. j. I I "..- ~ . . ,-, ~ I,.N -; 10. -.0 -L .( ~l I~ ~~'r ..... -'j I"f") I f'<l " ~ '.. ~: js 1 'i J'\ i -:B ~. \ ;i ~I; .~ I o ..... x U.I :z: Z '" '('. :lt~ /' , " ~ I , ~ ~ , -.l _...... ~ .' - , ') , :^~.~,. , .!..I 11 _, ~ o en " .; . . NI:\' i ,'S.' ":: ; . V ~ nl~: 3...." ","I~ """I "'! .., ('f f! '<"lOll (I'til ..0:- wl ';':II'~w , .. . , l' '"'I ; 'lfJ01 .. "I "n ~Il ~ ,., ,,. ""I _ .",,;: ""',0;:, ... ... Vi":,,, < ('0 ... ~ u", f"\1~ :i~l'.:.: ..'litl:. ~\ l.fI4/ '''::0 "": .......... ~ ~ "<f" '"; iliff it,. Q ~ ~~ '! ',.'.t .".#41 _ ", It:. ~ Ill''' 0',", .., v "" '1. .. "<1'1" "". ~""I~ eLll ~ ....,h, ~ ;:4;. ".lill,..-.,r;t "...,,~_ 0" ..\ .',-s..- t..',' . . I:~~ ~ tU:J .'t. . c:: V'l - ~t--lJ.JQ ~~~8 o '(141' ...~ . u :@I~~ 'N i -~~ 'k 4~ ~._r ).. w I~ '. I" I\j -=: .- ~n~ J :;; r") IY)I~ I~ 6~ IV) " I' ~.., '-J I ... 'I" U'lt ~I; !:I~ "'" r-:...... ~ ~ ~~L.u "q .. ,., (1'(' t....... ("/ . . \ UI 1UtfL.....,...... lIi,anllllllf%ll.. "NIlA..........,." -",-- 'ftyllNll~loI ! N'V'1", I !::aE.L';;":,...; : -\7r.~d=:;'C~ Te:>>:ri ~"Ji1~I;o; .~4. .., , : i ~I-I-r i CQ -. ?I 'fCI.c:l1O....DIU:liOlOl'ollIW " Ii ,d' i - - .. I I D- gc.J.l7.) f01Nl0a.~~': : Ill! J A . 1<1) ~ ~ 1==1 i -::=a: ==1 ~i \-1 ~~I -1_. "-11-: w....:.=QI :;\(T~; . t J It 'Pd , ~~ i i By Ii i h.pe i I ~=hl ~ liiil !1:lj~~ I~ii!!i !ul~~, . r' .. t Ih I , ~III,I I b ii1i I~ I hid II i ~~ll!!';: I !fM:li~ ! )~m:UI~ : d~~!imw~ ; ~_ ...'" 'of 011 ------ .,u III -~.. OZ;::!;;IK'I~ 1 ~(D5 I J · . ~cnnl~U , wCi') CR' : 0 ff~' h~ f ,- ~. f 2 hii. III ~!ili. !!~II~~~~ n ~~!:!!: n3~!l i~ iiU ~ ~ ,;;;;; flll : i ,Iiit I......... ......I.! I 18 J II ~ i ~ liit mtiil ~ ~ ; Iii I mB~~lllli I~~ .I;LID sh II~ I'a I !_ iii lij~ 11m B ' t,~... ----i-' -'-.----.-. -.. - -.--t--.--.---. -. "-----~:t::;:_ ~ .. - -~~:- pP~"':ll';',ogPIO- - : 1;J ,:t,... ~. . ~ II) .. I J '''"''I~ .. II :'lh ~ll >=II :... 9~ .,~ "", II ~~ I . I~ '/ i t _,_.1.1,,1., \~- ~ I- . ~1:::'-:::::...' ~, ....~.... "-' '. '. . "':::::'::::.~.,: .. I , I If !:; - -- .. M. yi f a. \ 18 :, II :'lit ;-.. I :-.. I II it ~I at I I , r.-..--;l-1 .~.---.---- - -.\ - - -- - - - - "... .::- ~ -1 -"-, ' . I 2 II" IUlI:..- ~_.._..- .-.. I 8M ~!! ~ ~ I f QJ~/,;:n~2 ~::~Clg ;~~.t:~; _J . LOGATlON MA? 'llf~lV; jf38~~!9~ ~C(~~ONS ~ , '. g, ~,. '-PIO--_c Z '\, ;0:::; B ],~. i ;8' ,)I.\'~ i:if j t tttii i, 'C ~ .iJ';\ L.; G.r! nl1 1-1, cLl.L} d (I # ~ ' ITJ ~~;i It" JIII;;lI L. LlTJI,G l.~____ < .'... to.:J3i'i _c:~?;_ . . 8oYNr, '" .....__"'- :'Si' =r:': ,.::' ! lilt, : it - I~t" flntritllJ] \ , ! ~, 1r'~~r'C~Lj#?iJ J; ~3 ;i L! ' '1 -L, . Je: ;'/1 rr ! 11J[J, "aOY~TO~a~ UL..:f.. ~1 ^ ^ JC=r- 7H+1r47i!J:lH-:j ','i r U fll ~ ::, ........ J~;/L7t_ f~ -~ .... ~t;tE'-- J I I ~,- ''R3J'!JI '~I . . '. AG J;i1Jli!l\WI'I.I =~~ : "'"II~/ - ':',' ~ !'fJi:!:~~ r"I"'~IC~t '~.,,~--.- I '-- r c ~lt-, I' 11"' P 'I'", 1:0, I _~'"' , 1 I;:: '-u _" ~ _ 1 f I, f;! ;. IHR,3,_ . d\ \...: '\i.. ~ " - I~~ i 7 r-== Q~"-lL'. _===:,1 r; , I 1 ~ \i1 ',r~ oJ S,I?;> ~ I ( . i~ ~ti3~~1 aIL . ^J ''',,/J /( (G.~~'" ';:::' Ob,,",~'. " "Il R"'C.' ...';;; /, ~, '~ c, ,,'t: ~ " a I') r-, " ~;r Ir,lj; I Or E :, ""':, I W" "Wi:-' ~(. 'f , / ',;, I, I " - 14:' ,,,:_, ' , ~~ 'r--j~;.I" ,,,',,' ,.......... ........ -, fl i I I f -L . t" '- ".. "" .... _.')( 'I ., ll"~" J :~crr \{:. , f}- ~:s r' ".~ r rrO' ,- - i, "7l~ ':1 ~ \{ , ; ; ) p, \\:\i "r""""lfi"10'" ~, 'JL 1'=..--1: I: i ''''''f'\\~ 9." .'~ f 'i (1,. P III ~- --, )),..d I ''r- , ' , 1..1E ""':.~,.' :{" ~ - U j;' ,;--lu.. I f~J.; , , ;;, P : '; ''', ~', ....~_-F;\, 1 1:. 0 1/8 MILES ~ ""~ \~'~ 0:. ~ '/ : ./. I \J (II '"", ~~~", 111/ I . :\ ~'; =Ir~ [ "!/ '040Q8g;>,f,",7~T _._ '_" n ~) n n " l.U"'iliii:R\!eQ9"""',JI'lO{l II "v~_~ "MOTOROL.. C- '-. .----.J - .:;-::- I , l '.)131 t1 ""e TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS w w Z & S BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 29, 1990 (Revised April 2, 1990) Prepared By: K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. 1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F West Palm Beach, FL 33406 (407) 964-7300 (FAX) 969-9717 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 LOCATION MAP FIGURE 2 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS FIGURE 3 DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC FIGURE 4 TOTAL TRAFFIC FIGURE 5 P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A CAPACITY AT LEVEL OF SERVICE "D" THRESHOLD VOLUMES APPENDIX B THRESHOLD VOLUMES FOR SIGNIFICANT PROJECT APPENDIX C HISTORICAL GROWTH CALCULATIONS APPENDIX D MAJOR PROJECT TRAFFIC APPENDIX E INTERSECTION ANALYSES INTRODUCUQ!'! This office has been retained to prepare a revised Traffic Impact Analysis addressing the traffic impact of proposed revi- sions to a petition for annexation, land use change, zoning change and site plan approval for a parcel of land located on the northeast corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Winchester Park Boulevard, in Section 30, Township 45 South, Range 42 East, in the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County, Florida. It is proposed to annex this parcel of land into the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. This Analysis has been performed in order to determLne the volume of traffic expected to be added to the roadway system as a result of the approval of this project, the effect that this traffic will have on the capacity of the roadways in the area of the project and what roadway improvements, if any, are necessary as a result of the approval of this project. This Analysis has also been performed in accordance with both the standards and criteria as established in the Zoning Code of the City of Boynton Beach and the technical requirements of the Palm Beach County Traffi~ Performan~A Standards ordinance #87-18 Existing traffic counts, which were available from the Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Palm Beach County Traffic Division were used. when applicable, and these counts were augmented by twenty-four (24) hour machine counts and peak hour hand counts performed for this office. SITE INFORMATION A petition was filed in January, 1990 for a 2.7 acre parcel to allow a mixed use commercial center. It was originally proposed to construct a 20,000 square foot r"tail building and a 1,820 square foot three bay oil change facility. ThE land owner has decided to delete area from this pEtition and change the proposed land use. It is now proposed to clnstruct a 4,000 square foot fast food restaurant on a 0.83 acre parcel of land. According to the site plan, as prepared by Lc Iday & Associates, the 4,000 square foot fast food restaurant will have one drive-up window and 40 parking spaces will be provided. The site plan also reflects that this project will have two points of access. There will be one driveway onto Boynton Beach Boulevard and Winchester Park Boulevard. The site is located in relation to the major roadways as shown in Figure 1. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS The major roadway providing direct access to the site is Boynton Beach Boulevard. Although this site does access directly onto Winchester Park Boulevard, for the purposes of this Report, \'!inchester Park Bouleval"d is net defined as a major roady.'ay. Winchester Park Boulevard is a four lane divided roadway of limited length between Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road and pr imar i 1 y serves as access to the Boynton Mall and as access to property fronting the road. Boynton Beach Boulevard, in tile immediate area of the project, exists as a six lane roadway. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has plans to widen the section of Boynton Beach Boulevard from one half mile west of Florida's Turnpike to Military Trail to a four lane di v ided road. According to the most recent FDOT Work Schedul e, this roadway construction will commence in the fourth quarter of 1990. In addition, FDOT has plans to construct an interchange at Florida's Turnpike with Boynton Beach Boulevard. The construc- tion of the interchange is scheduled to commence in the Spring of 1990. -2- .rll..U.(PIlOO.....-c' 3""0 II ~ 96-1 UJ > <( o z '" '" ;= Z k. s. rogers, consulting engineer. inc. west palm beach, fl. 3^V llVIH , .... CVOI:l z o .... z >- o lD o ...J o o > ...J lD o "" o a: :to '-' <( UJ !Xl ~L ...;;.'J CI:l llVVi CI:l H.lnN>l UJ > <( UJ > <( :!: .... '" o a: co '" ;= (/) UJ (/) SS3I:lDNO:) 3:)N3I:lMVl z o .... z >- o lD AI:lV.llllVi LOCATION MAP date JAN 90 figure 1 o en en '" =' a: 11. <( o UJ ~ > UJ a: ~here are several other roadway improvements in the project study area ~hich will affect this project's status with the Traffic Perf,)rmance StC'ndards Ordinance. A summary of these improvements is presented below: MlJitary TrpJl-, A. Boynton Beach Boulevard to Hypoluxo Road will be con- struct ed as a six lane roadway by Palm Beach County with con- struction anticipated to commence by the middle of March of this year. The contract for construction is in the process of being let. As construction of this section Military Trail is expected to commence prior to the approval for this project, this Report will assume that Military Trail has been constructed. B. Steiner Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard, according to the County's Five Year Road Plan, will be widened from four to six lanes in fiscal year 1991-92. Old Boynton Road: A. Knuth to a five (5) 1991-92. Road to Military Trail, is scheduled to be widened lane roadway by Palm Beach County in fiscal year Coneress Avenue: A. Miner Road to N.W. 22nd Avenue is scheduled to be wid- ened dur i ng 1990 to a six (6) lane divided roadway by the de- veloper of The Shops of Boynton. B. N.W. 22nd Avenue to Boynton Beach Boulevard is also scheduled to be widened to a six (6) lane roadway by the develop- er of Palm Isle PUD. This widening is expected to commence during 1991. The existing roadway average annual daily volumes and the roadway capacities are shown in Figure 2. TRIP GENERATION The trip generation rate for this proposed project was determined based upon information published in "Trip Generation - Fourth Edition", Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1987. - 3- IIIUI.Il.,III,'1II001ll..,NIC;, 31".' J1. ...:::,. o > ...J lD UJ > <( UJ > <( 96-1 0 :!: a: .... '" '" '" "'10 T ...0 ,..0 ...~ en'" 0 en~ ~<D <( "'... 0 a: ",0 T or 00 :I: ",0 00 '-' ,..0 0>0 ",0 ~... "'''' 0>0 ... "'<D ;= "'''' UJ "'... UJ lD (fJ (J) 3^V T ~L. SS3I:lDNO:) ",0 ~g ",0 UJ ~O <D'" ~'" "'<D > ~.:.:l ... <( Z Ol:l 11VVi o __-' ,---,..:: Z T '" 0 >- Ol:l H.lnN>l "'0 ",0 0 <D'" ~O lD T ,..<D ...0 ",0 "'... '" "'~ ~'" ~ ~ 0 OVOI:l 3:)N3I:lMVl Z '" '" 00 UJ "'0 ::; ...... "'<D '-'=> -...J 0 ("J1"'lt :1:0 ;= ...J <(> 0 ~o. 0 Z 0> ...Jo 0> 11\11:l.l AI:lVllll~ " O. ~ Z C Z:!:(J) ",' 0 z t=CfJo =' .... W (fJUJ...J Z C!l _a: a: >- x:!:.... 0- 0 W UJ....<( <( .... lD 0 UJ T ~ <DO "'~ > ~'" UJ ~ - a: k. s. rogers, consulting engineer, inc. west palm beoch, fl. EXISTING ROAD CONDITIONS date JAN 90 figure 2 The Generation rate for this proposed to be 6321 trips per day per 1,000 square average daily generction for this 4,000 restaurant is calculated to be: project was determined feet. Thus, the total square foot fast food 4,000 sf x 632.1 tpd/lOOO sf = 2,528 tpd As shown above, on an average weekday, the project will gEnerate approximately 2,528 vehicle trips at the project's driveways. It should be noted that Article VI, Section 2 B(7) of ordinance #87-18 recognizes that not all traffic generated by certain land uses is additional traffic on the adjacent roadway network. The Ordinance does allow for the consideration of pass-by or captured traffic. Restaurants are one of the land uses for which pass-by traffic can be considered. According to the recently adopted Palm Beach County Road Impact Fee Ordinance, #89-19, the pass-by rate for a fast food restaurant use is 30%. Thus, the external traffic is recalculated to be: USE TOTAL GENERATION (TPD) CAPTURED TRIPS (TPD) EXTERNAL TRIPS (TPD) FAST FOOD REST. 2528 tpd 758 tpd 1770 tpd As shown above, accounting for captured traffic, the project will generate approximately 1,770 external trips per day at buildout and full occupancy. TBAFFIC DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT The traffic distribution used in the preparation Analysis was prepared according to an examination of patterns and travel patterns in the project study area. of this 1 and use -4- Based upon the preceeding, the traffic distribution for this project was determined and is shown below: NORTH 27% EAST 32% SOUTH 21% WEST 20% The distributed traffic volumes for this project are shown in Figure 3. In accordance with the Traffic Performance Stand- ards Ordinance, the distributed traffic was l:rought five miles from the site, or until the project generated less than 1% of the capacity of the roadway (Insignificant Volume). EFFECT ON CAPACITY The Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordi- nance delineates very specific criteria which must be met prior to any Rezoning or Special Exception Request being approved. Petitions are classified as being either a "Significant Project" or "Insignificant Project" according to the project impact on roadway links and the capacity of the impacted roadway links. A "Significant Project" is defined by Ordinance #87-18 as a project which generates more than one percent (1%) of the thresh- old vol ume at Level of Service "D" on any 1 ink wi thin the project's radius of development influence. The threshold volumes for "Significant Projects" are shown in APPENDIX B. For a two 1 ane road, the thresho Id vol ume for a signif icant impact is 131 trips per day, 300 trips per day for a four lane divided roadway and/or five lane undivided roadway, and 464 trips per day for a six lane divided roadway. Reviewing the project volumes in Figure 3 with the threshold volumes in APPENDIX B, it is seen that this project creates a significant impact on the following roadway links: - 5- .1l1....flll"IIIOGIII.'MIC;' ,'noo II 96_1 , ~ o > ...J !Xl UJ > <( UJ > <( :!: 0 a: .... '" '" '" 0 <( 0 '" a: "'1'" tl~ 0'" ...... *1- 0'" "'", ~~ "'- . :!: "'r '" '-' '" '" "'0 "'10 ... T ;= "'10 "'''' "'0 UJ 0'" "'0 UJ "'''' !Xl "'... (J) "'''' (/) 3^V '" ~L" SS3IWNO:> "'10 "'1'" 00 ,..'" UJ ~'" "'... > ... '" a ll"',d lV Vi ""0 "',... ",0 ~o ,..", _'" "'''' ...... Ol:l H.lnN)/ k. s. rogers, consulting engineer, inc. west palm beach, fl. o OVOI:l z '" '" ;= z l1Vl:l.l '" "'I~ "':: * ",I:: "'~ '" "'I~ "'''' ~ - '" "'I'" ...'" ...... z o .... z >- o lD "'I~ "'''' "'- 30N31:lMVl * "',... "'''' "'... o ...J o z o .... z >- o !Xl AI:lVllllVi DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC o '" '" ",' ...J a: 11. ... o UJ (J) > UJ a: a: o ........... ,-,,-, ~<< "'11.11. ~:>::;::; LL..J__ LLOI-f- <>zz 0::0<<( I-....Jou t-OU::U: C '-':!:-- Z wwzz ""')UJoo W Oo:C;:;Ci; C!l a::!: z w 0.1-<- .... "'10 ",0 ~'" '" date JAN 90 figure 3 TABLE 1 SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ROl\Jl LINK BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD WINc'HESTER PARK BLVD. Congress Avenue - Knuth Road Boynton Beach Blvd. - Old Boynton Rd. It is concluded that this project is classified as a "Sig- nificant Project" according to Ordinance #87-18. The Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance requires that for any roadway link upon which the project creates a significant impact, the total traffic on that roadway link be analyzed dur i ng the buil dout per iod for the pro Ject. Accordi ng to the Petitioner, this project could be built and occupied during 1993. Thus, a buildout year of 1993 hilS been established ar,d this analysis will use 1993 as a basis for its calculations. The total traffic is defined as the sum of the existing average, annual daily traffic, the project traffic plus the background traffic. The background traffic is further defined as the sum of the historical growth plus traffic generated by major projects which are in excess of 10% of the capacity of the af- [ected roaJwoi link. The total traffic volume.; are showl' ..." Figure 4. The 1993 projected traffic has been determined by taking the sum of the existing 1989 MDT, plus the projected historical growth, plus the traffic generated for major projects which are in excess of 10% of the roadway's link capacity. The historical growth calculations are shown in APPENDIX C. The major project traffic volume calculations are shown in APPENDIX D. A review of the available information revealed that none of the major projects identified would generate more than 10% of the capacity of a road link upon which this proposed project would create a significant impact within the buildout period. -6- IIIn''''Kf.(''.OOllla~' 1119'11 II 96-1 1- 3^'" UJ > <( o z '" '" ;= Z 11...I:l.l k. s. rogers, consulting engineer, inc. west palm beach, fl. , , "'"'~co "'~ '" _co ... ... ~'" , O\lOl:l o > ...J lD o <( o a: I w~ .... f- ..... - ............ en :-'J Ol:l 11"'~ Ol:l HlnN>l z o .... z >- o !Xl o ...J o :I: o <( UJ III "'...~co COl"- _ "'''' l"- I"- '" '" co "'",~I"- "'1"- ~ "'... '" I"- "' '" co 30N31:lM...l z o .... z >- o lD UJ > <( UJ > ... :!: .... '" o a: co '" ;= (/) UJ (J) SS31:lDNOO AI:l....lll'Vi TOTAL TRAFFIC o lL lL 00<( u::u::o:: LLl.&. t- U <<0 u: o::a:ZLL t-t- ~ c:( Ol-OC: zu a: I- ct=wO-l z (f.)""')~ < UJ-OtJt- oxa:<o UJ wo..ml- .... lOr-- "It fD MCO 00 (0,....... Il) I"- "' '" '" '" date JAN 90 figure 4 o '" 0> - '" ~ a: 11. <( o UJ ~ > UJ a: The total traffic volumes for the buildout year of 1993 are shewn wlth the roadway capacities in Figure 4. Reviewing the total lolumes and the roadway capacities in Figure 4, it is seon that on the roadway links upon which this project creates a significant impact, the total traffic does not exceed capacity. Therefore, this Petition meets the link test. PEj\K HOUR The second test that a "Significant Project" must meet is the Intersection Test. This test requires that all major inter- sections within the radius of development influence be analyzed through which the project generates 10% or more of the total traffic on any link of the intersection. Reviewing the volumes in Figure 4, it is seen that this project does not generate more than 10% of the total traffic on any of the roadway links in the project study area. Therefore, this petition meets the Intersection Test. In addition, the Ordinance requires that peak hour turning movements shall be analyzed where the project's traffic meets the directly accessed links. The peak hour volumes generated by this project were calculated in order to determine what site related improvements, if any, will be required. The peak hour generation rates for each use were determined to be a percentage of the average dail y traf f ic. For the pur- poses of this Report, only the P.M. volumes will be analyzed. l1SE FAST FOOD % OF ADT PEAK HOUR VOLUME IN QUT 0.067 (2528) = 169 86 83 -7- The P.M. peak hour volumes at the project entrances are shown in Figure 5. Also shown in Figure 5 are the project vol- umes at the intersection of Knuth Road and Boynton Beach Boule- vard. A review and an analysis of the volumes shown in Figure 5 were performed based upon the procedurEs in "Interim Materials on Highway Capacity", Transportation Res"arch Circular Number 212, January 1980 and the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. From these analyses, shown in APPENDIX E, no additional roadway improvements have been found to be necessary as a resul t of this project's traffic. CONCLUSION This proposed fast food restaurant is expected to generate an average of 1,770 additional trips per day on the area's road- way system at complete occupancy and buildout. This project is classified as being a "Significant Project" as defined by the existing County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. As this project meets both Intersection Test, it is concluded approved in accordance with the Palm formance Standards Ordinance #87-18. the Link Test and the that this project can be Beach County Traffic Per- -8- , 0 a: < > w ... ::> 0 al X U < W al r--------~I \ jl I H~H~""'I I w I !:: I (J) ~ ~ '" ...'" 1 I"- :~ ~ '" o~ I"- l1J L ) '-(lle)lle 0 avo", "vw (aO~)9V""'" '\ t "'0 u._ (LL H~...... "'... ~~ a:u. "'''' "'''' ....< ... o a: - U::~1- ~o u......... '" <uo C a:UJUJ Z ....~~ w ....00 C!l o a: a: UJll.ll. w 0'" z .... 0 a:"'+ ... ll.~ Z 0 ,. 0 '" al "'~ '" ","' - '" oj - ~ =' a: 11. Zl < . , 0 UJ ~ > UJ a: k. s. rogers, consulting dote engineer. inc. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES JAN 90 west palm beach, fl. figure 5 IIIIU.....'IIIPtIOOIl.......:l ,,"U APPENDIX APPENDIX A THRESHOLD VOLUMES LEVEL OF SERVICE "D" (AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC) ROADWAY TPll Two Lane 13,100 Four Lane Undiv~~~~ 27,800 Four Lane Divided 30,000 Five Lane Undivided 30,000 Six Lane Divided 46,400 Eight Lane Divided 60,000 Six Lane Freeway 95,000 APPENDIX "B" THRESHOLD VOLUMES FOR SIGNIFICANT IMPACT MINIMUM VOLUME (TRIPS PER DAY) THOROUGHFARE TYPE Two lane 131 Four lane (Divided) 300 Five lane (Undivided) 300 Six lane (Divided) 464 Eight lane (Divided) 600 Six lane (Expressway) 950 APPENDIX C HISTORICAL GROW~H CALCULATIONS W W Z & S BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD HISTORICAL EXI STING GROWTH 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 ROADILINK BAT!;: MDT MDT MDT: MDr MDT BOYNTON BEACH BLVD: Congress - Knuth 6.7% 27365 29198 31155 33242 35469 Knuth - Lawrence Rd. 6.7% 27365 29198 31155 33242 35469 Lawrence - Mil i tary 6.7% 24420 26056 27802 29665 31652 WINCHESTER PARK BLVD: Bytn.Bch.B.-Old Bytn* 4135 5135 "NOTE: No historical growth data is available. Assume 1000 trip per day increase. APPENDIX D MAJOR PROJECT TRAFFIC w w Z & S ~. The following Major Projects have been identified as having an impact in the project study area: BOYNTON BEACH MALL MOTOROLA ';)UANTUM PARK MELEAR PUD COUNTRY CLUB TRAIL PALM ISLES PUD SUN VALLEY PUD B. None of the above Major Projects were idenitified as creating more than 10% of the capacity on the roadways upon which the W W Z & S project created a significant impact. APPENDIX E TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CENTER CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS BOYNTON BEACH BLVD & MALL ROAD DATE 1993 PM ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 50 CRITICAL N/S VOL 102 CRITICAL E/W VOL 749 CRITICAL SUM 851 ************************************* LANE NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTH LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH 1 2 3 4 5 6 . . . . . . . R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 . . . . L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 . . . . L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 . . . . . .. . . . . L.. 12.0 . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT o o o 200 o 77 95 1436 o o 1528 248 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TRUCKS (%) 5 5 5 5 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o PEAK HOUR FACTOR .9 .9 .9 .9 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH :5. DIRECTION SEPERATION :1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED : 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) 90 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND HRU -RIGHT 0 0 614 749 LEFT 0 102 105 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NPUT VOLUME 0 200 95 0 "DJUSTED VOL 0 195 105 0 CAPACITY 0 0 0 135 MOVEMENT N/A N/A NO OK