REVIEW COMMENTS
s...~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-460
TO:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works
AI Newbold, Building Division
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp.
Bill Hukill, Development Department
FROM:
Michael E. Haag
Current Planning Coordinator
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP, '~d
Planning and Zoning Director
THRU:
DATE:
September 10, 1996
SUBJECT:
Boynton Commons - Rectified Master Plan
(sign-off)
- File # REZN 96-001
The amended master plan, in connection with rezoning from C-3 to PCD, for Boynton
Commons has been submitted for final sign-off by the Technical Review Committee. Three
(3) sets of plans, each requiring your unconditional signature, are available for review in
the Planning and Zoning Department. A copy of the originally reviewed plans, staff
comments and City Commission approval of the Rezoning will be available for your use to
perform the review.
Please review and sign-off each of the three (3) sets of plans, NO LATER THAN 5:00
P.M., SEPTEMBER 19, 1996. If the plans are not in compliance with your staff comments
or City regulations, sign the plans "subject to memo". To facilitate the sign-off process,
please resubmit written comments addressed to the Planning and Zoning Director, NO
LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., SEPTEMBER 19,1996.
It should be noted that the applicant is required to plat the property and is preparing plat
documents that will be processed through the Development Department. The plat and
construction documents shall coincide with the signed-off Master Plan, any major deviation
desired by the developer must be approved by the Technical Review Committee.
Thank you for your prompt response to this request.
MEH:bme
cc: Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Marshall Gage, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Director
Steve Campbell, Fire Department
Central File
a:MP-SOBOY,WPD
. -I
\' ", ',,0
\J ...
, ;
I'
f
L
"
/
..
\'0'
.Q.
~~
I 'i-l
fp
~r ~~
~ OJ, '
l"
~'
{",,'0 ~\l'f'
(1(".W
lP t't'~
j') 1
,) J'{
iJ 'J U
u . C ;;~
15' U 0 -1-
1:->' U Q,-
n-oo +
U.tJLJ -I-
(J. U U -,-
e,-uo +
D . oj 0 r
:';' U U ,.
J 1 . U U +
::: . u u
a-oo +
{} . U 0
1 ~) . U U +
1 :!. U U +
j.UU +
'{ . 00 +
I U . U U +
'( . U U .,
:5. iJ 0 +
U-J;J +
n-uo +
'/-,. U U I
f:; . U U -(-
3' U lJ -.-
'{ . (J 0 +
1 1 . U U +
~) . tJ 0 .;-
1 ./~ I Ll U +
;~. U 0 +
t'~ :l,~ . U U I
iJ . 0 0 T
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-385
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utility Dept. Chief Field Insp.
Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
William Hukill, Director Department of Development
Tambri J. Heyden, A~CP '@4
Planning & Zoning D~rector
TO:
DATE:
July 22, 1996
SUBJECT:
Rezoning
Project:
Location:
Application - 2nd Review
Boynton Commons
Southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and
Congress Avenue
Land Design South
REZN 96-001
Agent:
File No. :
Attached is the amended master plan submittal for the above
referenced project for your review and recommendation. We would
ask that you review this amended master plan submittal to determine
if the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments previously made
by your department.
If your comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met
at time of site plan review, please advise the Planning and Zoning
Department in writing. If your comments have not been met, please
advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing.
Finally, we would ask that you include in your memorandum a
recommendation as to whether the project should be forwarded to the
Planning and Development Board for consideration. Please return
your memorandum and the amended plans (Engineering Division shall
keep their plans) to the Planning and Zoning Department by 5:00
P.M. on July 29, 1996.
If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel
free to call Michael E. Haag at Extension 6260, who is coordinating
the review of this project.
cc: Carrie Parker, City Manager (Plans)
(Memo Only)
Floyd Jordan
Charlie Frederick
Marshall Gage
John Guidry
a: 2ndRevwm. COM
,
/><-y.,-p., ',-,-,...,~~.,,- ()1~,-, If::> rt.-ex',<(
.-
S,.,C ''V\; -/i ~ cl. c.. ....( (- ',Co
Cc
,( "J-d (~
f~( - ) v ... f c20!
r-'./- l':.
'?\""'f"'--r-t t <-lJV\<"C.(
"'(ktl<c "V' )""...',1 S",ly l;l, /1<jb
N.'",,~, '1\~'~ .,.C
C,'''-...(,,-t-'''y r'y
0{ c ". e. ~ 1",,()I ,.;2,)- rl..
D<,,".,~I.L,(\,,-t..r-fr A"y"f ,J'n.1:.. "
7.> ' .
t-U,< .:he,,^, cJ.....f?>
""\,VY"t 0n. '-....t 13M..
~~~e- 'E'
- .:- ~7 '-<. Y
-.,.. (L1(';'" ,:'" G:"r'ov,J)~ci2 :/
.{.'.'" ,- I
.\0.... 2l,.....v~ y -
y {~yJ..f '))c:;c"f -he", - K<-.", s<c>,Q .JJ.s.cr,/,I7CM s.v(;rn; ~kQ/.~~'Xt( =-h Qr:Q
)y..perfr (,:"f - /' ""') 6c<~~f"
k~ tr1'r7!/i" - V:j ~
cn"~(..;re> / 0
5' ~ ""rs vi'
~ .~(i c,,-hCIA... en~<se..Y'1,,-y,.f -
4ue. Be b 3~\'7 -fL ' fJ "- <::.'ff'
!J5 ~ .--.iy cLcc0.:> I (~y/:s !-I~~. Cf.,<" c.....Fr.'"
t"7'~ J':,s .f;f"-c' A~7,;:~c~.....f t-;< c y-pro-,?!-- /i~<5-- sz/l'7fc- , eml'kyPle'.ht: )
U5Cs ..t>-n;/ f'J.-c.",y 1/,'IF'7'd.-{ &-<....{", &~".JLdS~1r11L deb"^'~ d
~ Q I J I'
)1 LP
_ V C \'-
r<:e- -
-f.S-co. <~ su~. ,t~-fr;O A, ~ #r",- o-b,cv-r<=J:) /Yl'P)'V1D q{,-oo~
, (o!<-cwIJ
\\(:'{~.5<'l.b)>?;-f~ 4Jifh ~c. ;/}€V 'j2EZ;.J <((,-c()(
41. ('J"Q-'
-fto
)s "!S-~) i5~~?U/'rcQ;; <L 3CD. <~~i? >~~y'<:cs_-,
- "L ;,~ -= ;J !!'~~ -,.~CV, f.~ Ii. in f (nf;
, ., t _ t..()--~~~_~'h ~ ..:~=f-~,,,
~f,c:.c.~'~ ;.5 ~ CC(ClC""- {' /'y .:s---;>"".
, I ! 000
,
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-404
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning :J::;ector
Michael E. Ha1Sa.7
Current Planning C dinator
August 8, 1996
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Boynton Commons - Rezoning
File No. REZN 96-001
Please be advised of the following comments relative to the second,
review of the above-referenced request:
1.
Modify the site data to identify nine (9)
required and provided. A truck well counts
loading zones are
as a loading zone.
2. Specify on the master plan, the dimension of the loading zones
in compliance with the city standards. Also show and identify
on the master plan the location of the block wall required to
screen the service areas at Video Ave. and Sports Authority
outparcel buildings.
3. Show and label on the master plan the ten (10) foot wide
peripheral greenbelt that is required around the perimeter of
the PCD with the exception of driveway openings and the 269.64
foot property line located in the southwest portion of the
site. The 269.64 foot property line received approval of
landscape appeal. The only improvements allowed within the
peripheral greenbelt area are landscaping and, where
applicable, a site wall and/or buffer wall. Omit the dumpster
enclosure from the greenbelt area along the south property
line.
4. Indicate in the site data found on the master plan that there
are five (5) single tenant leased outparcel buildings rather
than seven (7).
5. Indicate in the site data found on the master plan that there
are 836 interior parking spaces provided. Also modify the
interior required landscape computations accordingly.
6. Indicate on the master plan a length dimension of a
handicapped and regular parking spaces. Also indicate the
width dimension of the handicapped access aisle that is
associated with a handicapped parking space.
7. To reduce the possibility of someone defacing the site walls
it is recommended that hedges be shown on the plans, along the
Old Boynton Road side of the site wall. It is further
recommended that where a site wall is required or proposed
that hedges or vines be planted on the side of the wall that
is closest to the property line.
Page 2
Memorandum No. 96-404
Boynton Commons - Rezoning
File No. REZN 96-001
8. To properly evaluate the impact the proposed Old Boynton Road
driveway will have on the subject site, adjacent intersection
at Congress Avenue and the existing driveway leading to the
site located on the north side of Old Boynton Road, show on
the master plan the lane configuration within Old Boynton Road
between Congress Avenue and Winchester Park Boulevard. Also
show the location, width and lane configuration of the
existing ingress/egress driveway located on the property that
is located directly north of the site on the north side of Old
Boynton Road.
9. Modify the master plan to show the final determination of the
parking lot variance, file number PKLV 96-003, regarding the
distance an on-site access aisle is located from the right-of-
way line. The variance request is for the major access aisle
associated with the driveway located on Old Boynton Road.
Also indicate with a note on the master plan the file number
(PKLV 96-003) and the date the City Commission made the final
determination.
10. Modify the site data to indicate the site area as 22.885 acres
to match the acreage identified on the survey attached to the
submittal rather than the 23.03 acres referenced on the master
plan. Adjust all site data accordingly.
11. Provide a copy of the city approved and executed unified
control documents.
12.
To complete
analysis as
application.
utilities.
the rezoning application submit a comparison
required of letter "h" on pages 4 and 5 of the
These analyses would be for employment and
13. Modify the master plan to reflect the conditions of approval
regarding the county's evaluation of the traffic impact
analysis that was submitted by the applicant.
14. It is recommended that the leased outparcel building
identified as Sports Authority be relocated to the north side
of the site and that the space remaining after removing the
leased retail building be replaced with the retention pond
that is presently located in the northwest corner of the
subject site. It is further recommended that, if a redesign
of the site would result in the omission of the driveway
located on Old Boynton Road that the removal of the driveway
not require an application for a master plan modification.
15. It is recommended that a lighted fountain be added to the
retention pond and that the lake plantings proposed for the
pond be designed to allow optimum view of the fountain from
the public right-of-way and the on-site vehicle use area.
16. Submission of a rectified master plan showing compliance with
conditions of approval will be required to be submitted the
Planning and Zoning Department in triplicate prior to platting
and site plan approval of the project.
MEH:dim
a:BoyComm2.REZ
RECREATION & PARKMEMORANDIJM #96-357
" _..~_..<
00 rn @ p U ~I rn 00
LI \
Jl 2 I 1996
PJfNNING AND
DNING DEPT.
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
I<J~
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
RE:
Boynton Commons
Master Plan Modification
DATE:
July 31, 1996
The applicant should continue to submit the following items:
I. A tree management plan (statement) for the large existing Banyan trees.
2. The lake (detention area) shown on the plan should have a lake planting plan and management
document.
The project should continue in the normal review process.
KH:ad
fOl1UtlLl \Yl ~ rnl
IJ1] JUL 3 0 . ~
RECREA nON & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-353
PLANNING MiD
ZONING Qsf.T
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Department
FROM:
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
B.y.... c.mm...t
July 30, 1996
RE:
DATE:
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the most recent Boynton Commons plan There are
no recreation related comments. The project may continue through the normal review process.
JW
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-047
00 rn rn D w " ic~
'W
I',
M 3 I 1996 :u
I
PlANNING AND
ONING OEPT.
FROM:
::t J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
~m Hukill, P.E., Director of Development
July 30, 1996
TO:
RE:
RE:
BOYNTON COMMONS PCD - SITE PLAN REVIEW 2ND SUBMITTAL
We have again reviewed documents you forwarded to us on July 19, 1996 and find the following
comments and recommendations unsatisfied:
2. Provide proof of unity oftitle also those requirements specified under Chap.2, Sec.6F3,
pg.2-53 and Sec.6F8, pg.2-56.
3.* All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time
of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting,
paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits
required from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting
agency shall be included with your permit request.
4. * County road entrance sign requires PBC approval & State road entrance sign requires
FDOT approval.
8. Show the locations of all temporary structures or permanent structures having a
temporary use. Provide a statement outlining the temporary use and when they will be
removed. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3R, pg.3-5
9. Provide a master stormwater management plan. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3T, pg.3-6
10. Provide copy of approved agreement with L WDD for use of drainage easements.
Chap.5, Art.V, Sec.1D6, pg.5-5
II. * Need SFWMD & L WDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art.IV,
Sec.5A, pg.6-7
12. Provide certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City
codes & standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8
13.* Minimum 15" pipe must be used in storm sewer. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7
15.* Parking lot section must conform to City code. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.10F, pg.6-12
17. Provide details on sanitary sewer easements that are crossed by drainage swales.
Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2b, pg.6-19
18.* Provide details for pavemcnt. grates, pipes, catch basins, etc. Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2e,
pg.6-20
19. * County and/or State permits required for construction in R.O. W. Chap.6, Art.VII,
Sec.4B, pg.6-24
20.* Applicant's attention is directed to Chap.7, pg.7-1 regarding surety requirements.
22. Not more than two free standing signs are allowed. Chap.21, Art.IV, Sec.3B, pg.21-17
23. Align access paths from sidewalks with H/C accessible paths including stop bars and
signs. Chap.23, Art.I, Sec.1B5, pg.23-1
Department of Development Memorandum No. 96-047
Re: Boynton Commons PCD - Site Plan Review 2nd Submittal
July 30, 1996
Page #2
24. * Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls, radii, signs, landscaping, etc. must conform
with City codes and standards. Chap.23, Art.lI, pg.23-6
25. * Photometrics must be approved for both pedestrian and parking lot lighting before
permit can be issued. Chap.23, Art.IIAla, pg.23-6
26.* CertifY that light poles are in compliance with Standard Building Code and withstand a
110 mph wind load. Chap.23, Art.IIAla, pg.23-6
27. * No trees shall be planted so as to interfere with lighting fixtures. Chap.23, Art.IIAb,
pg.23- 7
28.* Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices". Chap.23, Art.IIB2, pg.23-7
30.* Concrete curb must conform to City standards. Chap.23, Art.IIE, pg.23-7
34. Eliminate parking backing directly into major north/south driveway which serves as a
local street. Chap.23, Art.II, Secl2, pg.23-9. Suggestion: As an alternate to elimination
of parking, eliminate connection to Old Boynton Road. A second alternative would be
to redesign entire northwest comer of project, possible switching retention area with
Major #5 and Retail/Office.
36.* Provide location & details of fire lanes. Chap.23, Art.IIM, pg.23-9
37. Provide fire lane at Walgreens. Chap.23, Art.IIM, pg. 23-9
38. * Provide continuation of sidewalks thru all driveways to mark pedestrian paths. Chap.23,
Art.II, Sec.P, pg.23-1 0
39. * Install WIIA-2 pedestrian signs at all crosswalk locations. MUTCD 3B-18, pg.3B-23
Recommendations:
B. Close off every other aisle opening to the north and south for a safer circulation pattern.
The new areas should be landscaped and curbed.
D. * Place stop signs and stop bars throughout the development where there is a question of
right-of-way. Examples: At east side of BameslNoble for northbound traffic; in the
center ofthe two Walgreens drive-thru lanes; at both ends of the two aisles between
Video Ave. and Walgreens for east and westbound traffic.
E. Consider the use of City approved road humps within the major driveway for speed
control.
F.* To discourage vehicles parking or standing in the fire lanes, stripe a six foot wide, cross-
hatched area parallel with the curbed sidewalks encompassing the words "Fire Lane"
(facing on coming traffic).
Many of these comments are included to inform the applicant of issues which will need addressing prior
to future reviews, but will not in themselves prohibit this site plan from moving forward. Those
comments are marked with an asterisk*
WVH/ck
C,BOVCOMM2
fD)~@~~wmrm
un[4~
PLA~';:'jii~G fINO
ZONING DEPT. ""
-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #96-168
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director \
THRU:
FROM:
Larry Quinn, Sanitation Superintendent
SUBJ:
Rezoning Application - 2nd Review - Boynton Commons
DATE:
July 30, 1996
The Public Works Department has no problems with the above rezoning application, the
project can be forwarded to the Planning & Development Board for consideration.
arry Quinn
Sanitation Superintendent
LQ/cr
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-356
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Boynton Commons
Rezoning Application
July 30, 1996
~~
ill
rn@~nwrnr:
-'1
~
I
I
1111 ^ I
PL~.;\1:'~li~G AND
ZONiNG DEPT.
I have no comments on the rezoning. The project should continue in the regular review process.
KH:ad
MEMORANDUM
Utilities # 96-258
~u~nJm~
AUG_'.
Pl),NNING APtD ',1!V
".,< ZONING DE '
TO: Tambri J. Heyden,
Planning & Zonin
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
Date: July 31, 1996
SUBJECT: Boynton Commons,
Rezoning Application, Second Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments:
Utilities has no comment.
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
sm/rezcoml
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella #
File
\n)~~
L~ AUG
~u~~~
_ 2 1996 \~
I
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-281
PLANNING I\NO
ZONING OEPT.
TO: Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning Department
FROM:
WilliamD. Cavanaugh, FPO I 4/ tfJ Ctutlt - ~/
Fire Department V'\Y ~ '----
DATE:
August 2, 1996
RE:
Boynton Commons
Old Boynton Rd. & Congress Ave.
REZN 96-001
We have no objections to this proposal.
cc: Chief Jordan
FPO II Campbell
File
--ill
1'---
AJ
,II
I
1 j . ~
.,: )
~,
. ./
~
'/
"'i"
<::
....
Q'
<.f'>
---f
~ m
,~;o
-0
CS'o
~
r-
se.. ~ e ~:i'
~ 's:~,
- (f)
c::r "" sy. ." .
(b 8.. Cli '-
Q~~'~'
~ m3'~.
~c.PC:N
:::;.;.....3(b
0)' ~ ~. Q
" N.....
:u.. (b .
0.0,- r:;:."
(1) -. (b C5 '
o. nr-2 o.
=s ~:::;" ~ ,-
~ g. (I) 0..
~. D. g (J)
< -~ ~
~ ~ &;-g
-U ~_.
'" (b u.~
,-J:>. 0-. 9. ~ ..-
Q- / ~ (b..........~
~ i ~ \ t -.t r ~ ~ ~ .! a ~r.,
~ ~ I". ~ ~ a. ::,. ~ ~.
, ~ if F l' ~j:~[,
~\. ~ ~ eo f \" Dl ~',
f t ~ 2 .::::l.~ ~JL
. :. . . ~ ~ \?" ~ ~ 1 '\ ~ Q ~ ~.:~
.'\ & ,.., ..... '\ ~ c- ~., ~ ~.......,
----------L--f'ft\'j\\ \~\~ ht"~
;...\ ~) (j \ _'0 -~ ~,c; [
~ <;'. -+ "".,. ~
~_____...____________..:.s;::.. .'\"...... p"..:-, l,',', ~," " l (St) ,,~;..,/~''':
. , ~ ~ '~j' ! t, .'.:~;~;',
n~~~ ._~, Q~i?R~-U~-_~:iSiD"I:"":I~~r'~,~;, :., ~~ '.::I::t' ~ :' (P!' -u.~~;~~
').--x '!i,.~~2 ,,'~-1~ .' 8.'::; ~ . . ".Ii;:J.". l>.,J::::.~,t",
(p_ . . ~F ;,-;. c; fj'j, t~ ',~ 'rl < ,
11-1 ' . 0 ...q', ...r ..". '" ~'. ,. 'Il
:;t.\ 0':' '. ", .:. i'U )\~~;-~:, ~" ,~. :\~~~~~i:'.~;; ~:f,:. "~~:!' r'.
~ JI~2!4:: .::: tY, ;:t;:.,iaw ;~; ~~..;~;,(p~' ;~;t~,: 'JJ..;.-.~: '''~\~;n'' ~,l:' ';;i
<)'~ :,; ,".J-, g :i~.'~~~ ,;;," ~:,:,,~,"'~;m .~,:' ~S.=. ~~\~ -,;.....: ,
I I ....,' .'~ ','~ \:::J~~.."' ~"'I ~~~,.I"jij; I. t:J ~ ;1'.'" J>it~\".~ .",~
\yz........ " ' .', "",'.. .'ny. .',,;;". -........,'. ~:}'-"J.. .:r'i' <; .:;' ; \' "':'f" ~"oi""~
'zz~' ::"," "}":",:,;:)'m~.",;-'..: *~. I ;l;JUrn";;< .% \". ',:;; I~;.... .......y.; ~
... -(i'\ I \ " ,." /..'," '.i.: t ~~ 1""'!~",!,~'-1l'~ ~ ,'", ~". '.., ~r"'"
}~:t:: ' '..' , " '. ' r, '... '/"~: cs);!. __ ,:..(J)~~, 'J.,( -;' "0:', ," ,', :-'; ";'." ,:'~
ITI """':., ~r-t'O., ..)>:t:': .:'-<% ..,' ,'" .~...\
^ . , ,.. , k ,...... . ....,. !.' '-0' : ....'" ,': . ,
\.,. t+; ..'\.P. -, a,..;.......... ," rTt It:";. -. ..,!
:J:: : '.-"m ~ .........:'~ --t ~.'. ...~; '-"" ,..<~: ...~ .."'" ~ ~~ ~
-I ' .'.'m,. ,J {SUJ' ',:,. '.,' :'.': ::tlt-..l~~': ,':,:;1::1-
'. ' (p,.." m -' tn ~~c;:JCS'" ,.;..c",
, .' '-'.: iller': ".~ ~e~~ ~ ~;
-l :z: .' r.' lJ.j '~G->
~o' \ ,
.. nU1~"""~
, , 0...;. t;{\J1i1>!'J
. ,. ,;',:->d'\\,~:,";;' :'~';;'::' t']:" ~T~~,\>l ',.. "
~()'I~;e; ~~"" .:~ -\~~ ,:1.~~~i:~ ,,::~,~~~~,"~
m"",,,!-, ~ .. l.J.....J'I. 'V..~t-.J."...__'~"""" ~...-
CJlllr
m"o
OQO
::!GlJ>.
2~::!
. ~2
OI~
m....
r~
-Ill
Jt>.
:;::?"
;:::;
o
\,'!:}
~
-<
CL
~
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
fD)rn
ll\1 AUG
UU~
81996
TO:
T AMBRI HEYDEN
PLANNING&ZONING
DATE:
August 8, 1996
FROM: OFC. RIGGLE
POLICE DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: BOYNTON COMMONS- 2nd RESUBMITT AL
REFERENCES: MEMO #0244
ENCLOSURES:
I have reviewed the above plans and find them to be in agreement with previously listed comments. At this time
I have no additional comments.
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-258
rn ~a5~il\'(l~ 00
JUL 5~
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
July 3, 1996
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Director of Planning & Zoning
FROM:
Al Newbold
Deputy Director of Development
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - REZONING
BOYNTON COMMONS CORPORATION
S.W. CORNER OF OLD BOYNTON RD. & CONGRESS AVE.
After reviewing the plans for the above referenced project, the Building Division has no
comments.
4/!f;<:/.Y
Al Newbo d
AN:bg
XC: William V. Hukill, P.E.
COMMONS.WPD
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-2
TO:
Tarnbri Heyden, Director
Planning & Zoning Department
Bob Bordlt FPO I
Fire Department
FROM:
DATE: July 8,1996
RE: Boynton Commons
SW Corner of Old Boynton Rd. & Congress Ave.
~ (; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,
Jl .- \~
v.l\l\\l\G~l\1I
VZOl\\l\G liEn
At this time, the only objection is the lack of fire lanes. The location of fire hydrants and siamese
connections will be required an the site plan.
cc: ChiefJordan
Deputy Chief Ness
Deputy Chief Gale
FPO II Campbell
File
~--
rD) rn @ ~- 0 WI rn 1 ~
Ul1C.'~ 191; I ~
. ,. ",. "ND
I.,.~___~ _ ~,~.:~: .:.::':, ~..)tPT.
RECREA nON & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-325
TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
RE:
Boynton Commons Corp.
k)#-
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan. Forester/Environmentalist
DATE:
July 12, 1996
The applicant has not submitted a tree management comment pertaining to the large Banyan trees on
the site. The proj ect should continue in the normal review process.
KH:ad
110) ~ HU Ul[ii),~.
\lft1l J' I I ~ ~ i
, ".,~..', . >
PlP,,,,,,,,G ^ND ~!4I
ZONING DEPT. "
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #96-150
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director %
THRU:
FROM:
Larry Quinn, Sanitation Superintendent
SUBJ:
Boynton Commons
DATE:
July 10, 1996
The dumpster enclosure behind major #4 located at the southwest comer of the property is
unacceptable. In its present location it would cause the sanitation vehicle to back blindly into
oncoming traffic around a curve. This location needs to be moved either east or west to avoid
this uns situation.
Larry Quinn
Sanitation Superintendent
LQ/cr
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #96-232
roJrn@rno
IlnJ II" I 2 _
,
00
ijj.A~iNING AND
IONiNG UEPT.
TO: Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zorn
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
DATE: July 12, 1996
SUBJECT: Boynton Commons Corporation,
Rezoning, First Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offers the following comments:
Utilities has no comment.
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
sm/commonzl
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella .v
File
.. rill
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT I
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-218
,.
['J~~~W
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
~~ Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
July II, 1996
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
BOYNTON COMMONS - SITE PLAN REVIEW
We have reviewed new site plan drawing I of2 dated 6/21/96 and have the following comments:
I. Revise documents to reflect all comments.
2. Provide proof of unity of title.
3. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at
time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following;
site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and tnffic control
devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and
any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request.
4. County road entrance sign requires PBC approval & State road entnmce sign
requires FDOT approval.
5. Develop peanut at intersection of major north/south drive and Old Boynton Road
to eliminate crossover traffic. Chap.2, Sec.6F2b, pg.2-53 and Chap.23, Art.II,
Sec.BI, pg.23-7.
6. Revise driveway on Congress to force exiting traffic into right turn only lane.
Chap.2, Sec.6F2b, pg.2-53
7. Provide off street loading in compliance with LDR Chap.2, Sec.6F7b, pg.2-56.
8. Show the locations of all temporal)' structures or permanent structures having a
temporal)' use. Provide a statement outlining the temporal)' use and when they
will be removed. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3R, pg.3-5
9. Provide a master stormwater management plan. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3T, pg.3-6
10. Provide copy of approved agreement with L WDD for use of drainage easements.
Chap.5, Art.V, Sec.ID6, pg.5-5
II. Need SFWMD & L WDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6,
Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7
12. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all
City codes & standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF,
pg.23-8
13. Minimum 15" pipe must be used in storm sewer. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7
14. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless otherwise approved. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5B,
pg.6-8 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8
15. Parking lot section must conform to City code. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.IOF, pg.6-12
16. Provide sidewalk locations & details. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec. lOT, pg.6-14
I 7. Provide details on sanital)' sewer easements that are crossed by drainage swales.
Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2b, pg.6-19
Development Dept., Engineering Div. Memo No. 96-228
Re: Boynton Commons - Site Plan Review
July II, 1996
Page #2
18. Provide details for pavement, grates, pipes, catch basins, etc. Chap.6, Art. V,
SecAB2e, pg.6-20
19. County and/or State permits required for construction inRO.W. Chap.6, Art.VlI,
SecAB, pg.6-24
20. Applicant's attention is directed to Chap.7, pg.7-1 regarding surety requirements.
21. All landscaped areas shall be provided with an automatic water supply system.
Chap.7.5, Art.lI, Sec.5B, pg.7.5-14
22. Not more than two free standing signs are allowed. Chap.21, Art.IV, Sec.3B,
pg.21-17
23. Align access paths from sidewalks with H/C accessible paths including stop bars
and signs. Chap.23, Art.I, Sec.IB5, pg.23-1
24. Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls, radii, signs, landscaping, etc. must
conform with City codes and standards. Chap.23, Art.I1, pg.23-6
25. Photometrics must be approved for both pedestrian and parking lot lighting before
permit can be issued. Chap.23, Art.lIAla, pg.23-6
26. CertifY that light poles are in compliance with Standard Building Code and
withstand a 110 mph wind load. Chap.23, Art.IIAla, pg.23-6
27. No trees shall be planted so as to interfere with lighting fixtures. Chap.23,
Art.lIAb, pg.23-7
28. Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices". Chap.23, Art.lIB2, pg.23-7
29. Landscaped areas in parking lots must be protected by wheel stops or curbs.
Chap.23, Art.I1E, pg.23-7
30. Concrete curb must conform to City standards. Chap.23, Art.lIE, pg.23-7
31. All driveways shall provide minimum access widths. Chap.23, Art.lIF, Sec.6,
pg.23-8
32. Major driveway to Old Boynton Road must have 100' clear to 1st access aisle
unless variance granted. Chap.23, Art.IIH5, pg.23-9
33. Provide 27' backup area, all stalls. Chap.23, Art.lI,I1, pg.23-9
34. Eliminate parking backing directly into major north/south driveway which serves
as a local street. Chap.23, Art.lI, Sec.I2, pg.23-9. Suggestion: As an alternate to
elimination of parking, eliminate connection to Old Boynton Road. A second
alternative would be to redesign entire northwest corner of project, possibly
switching retention area with Major #5 and Retail/Office.
35. All parking lots shall meet or exceed State Handicap Code requirements and
comply with the Standard Building Code and the Countywide amendments thereto.
Chap.23, Art.I1K, pg.23-9
36. Provide location & details of fire lanes. Chap.23, Art.I1M, pg.23-9
37. Provide fire lane at Walgreens. Chap.23, Art.lIM, pg.23-9
38. Provide continuation of sidewalks thru all driveways to mark pedestrian paths.
Chap.23, Art.lI, Sec.P, pg.23-1O
39. Install WlIA-2 pedestrian signs at all crosswalk locations. MUTCD 3B-18,
pg.3B-23
Development Dept., Engineering Div. Memo No. 96-228
Re: Boynton Commons - Site Plan Review
July II, 1996
Page #3
In addition, we have the following recommendations:
A. Locate all sets of WC stalls along northern fire lane at least one aisle over to the
west to line up in front of the entrances to Sports Authority, Bed, Bath, etc., and
the retail office building.
B. Close off every other aisle opening to the north and south for a safer circulation
pattern. The new areas should be landscaped and curbed.
C. Reduce both fire lane aisles and add a third lane within the major driveway for
north and south turning movements into the aisles.
D. Place stop signs and stop bars throughout the development where there is a
question of right-of-way. Examples: At east side ofBarnesINoble for northbound
traffic: in the center of the two Walgreens drive-thru lanes; at both ends of the two
aisles between Video Ave. and Walgreens for east and westbound traffic.
E. Consider the use of City approved road humps within the major driveway for
speed control.
F. To discourage vehicles parking or standing in the fire lanes, stripe a six foot wide,
cross-hatched area parallel with the curbed sidewalks encompassing the words
"Fire Lane" (facing on coming traffic).
G. Reduce north and south fire lanes from 30' to 24' and use additional 12' to create a
third lane in major east/west driveway for turning maneuvers into aisles.
WVH/ck
C,BCOMSPR
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
rn
mmO\Ylm
.0;'.1-'.
00
TO:
TAMBRI HEYDEN,
PLANNING & ZONING
DIRECTOR
DATE:
8 JULY 96
ZONING DEI'[
FROM: SGT. MARLON HARRIS
POLICE DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: BOYNTON COMMONS - 1st RESUBMITT AL
REFERENCES: MEMO #0243
ENCLOSURES:
I have reivcwed the above plans and find the following:
-Congrcss Ave IngresslEgress - the plans show a median or island as requested in previous
memorandums. This, alone, is insufficient for proper traffic control. Attached is a sugessted
plan for properly controlling traffic in this area, and to prevent left turns from either shopping
plaza. This area should also be controlled with proper signage (NO LEFT TURN, RIGHT
TURN ONLY) both on the median facing the egress traffic and at the STOP SIGNS at the
egress of both shopping plazas. Addtionally, one of the egress lanes should be omitted and
only a single lane present for exiting traffic.
-Old Boynton Road IngresslEgress - this area appears to be a very congested/hazardous traffic flow
concern. The plans show two drive-through lanes of the Walgreens, two way traffic flow for the
aisle to the north of that; two-way travel for large semi trucks from the west side of the ingressl
egress, and normal traffic flow traveling north and south from this area. All of this is within the
first 30 feet of entering the property.
My recommendation is to make the ingresslegress a RIGHT TURN INIRIGHT TURN OUT
ONLY. This can only be accomplished by construction of a traffic triangle (concrete,raised
curb), along with appropriate signage (NO LEFT TURN, RIGHT TURN ONLY). This triangle
will also prevent left turn into the property from westbound traffic on Old Boynton Road. Therc
is not enough room for a left turn storage lane to accomplish left turn travel. The triangle will
also prohibit left turn out and crossover travel, which is not rccommcndable in this area.
I would also recommend that the aisle on the north side ofthe Walgreen's drive-through should
be a one-way only, for west bound travel.(see attached drawing) At the end of the drive-
through lanes and the one-way aisle, there should be "DO NOT ENTER" signs.
,
.~
."-.~
<l:-
--f
:: :.~ -:F':~ ::0':': :;~.:':"
'i':;'-....' ,", ~'..
)'. .' ...!o<~'^..."'lO_
....-..
.
,
~, '
~
.
.
,
\.'
.
,
,
.
.'
1 'f'"
~< ,,,,;,,;, ~
-,+" t...
.~~..M.('..;.'.-~..r..:'.-
;...". . -"" ;", ,"
j, ." - ""', ~ :
I \. j'
'."{ t, ':t'
';:, :1-:, <>1,;,,<
".1 t
' .';' '-t" .
. t" ",~ , '.~
. ,.~",'.:',.'"
}~!::.Lf:{
i.-(" ~~l ~,,;"'f' ,:
.: . ~.
< \ :.. I
:';"<'~:1:. ~" 1
~,jI.~.1 -~. .
"=:J';:J ';;,? :?r
";61'iMtt"t'''' 'f{ .
-:t7~&rTER '
,",,' ',:".,' 'J' .
~i
~, .,.'
'~~:""
'.'
;'~'l
. ~ .:
~,:. .
LO~9~ tF-A.
, " BED. BATH t BEreND
,,;,.... 'M.' .'
~ I.. .'. "(., .'..." .' ~
'fl.. ,'j.."'",_" ,';' > < '.. ," _,'.' 'I." ',,' ~ ... : , '
..~~ h' -~, " > I">" ,>.1 >l" '''~~~Ua.! ~":.'.t':~
.....~~~ .~ I V~;o1I~~T~~_:'~_~"
. j. ~.~. .ft. " ,,,-.;" ,~
::t
~
..
.
-250'
.~:
r'
.
.
.
.
.RETA.lL/~,
, '. ~~~'~~ ~
. "
;.
','
.-,
ih
r-
.
.
,
:.i;W '.
." ~-.
50'
30'
3fj
50'
5tl
, ,
1;. M ~,.,,~... ........ -......... ............. ........ .................. ......-:.. .."... 'i'......;......i-'...~..-"';..-:':,... J
~
) II
\
- ' "," '<-\.
'---f "'tt'~.,"
~.~_,:~~..~~_~,:".~,~.."1-:~' ,,' >
" ..r
,-;,~~.
'. ~:, ..
"~~~;~;
'\'
~ ,-,
.
'~"I\.l
i';'~oth ..'
.~
.~
-0 .......
5--
1;-
# >^'
",
"~7
,;,>'
'<I,
1)\
'\
~
,
..-
.
.
.
.
,
,.
,
,
.
.
.
..
.
,
,
I
.
-'
,
.
.
'.
.,
'.~;
:\.
.
,.
j,l"
~..
,-::
,
,.. "t'.
f{:P'
;t
'?
~
~
G!
~
~
::s:
~
.-:)
.,',
.1.1'
Q)
,~
;s;::: .
V
1i
""';-::/:;.
" :,t;J~_
'" >~,~~\;~
..q-
U\
c<"
--------
...-------------
.-;,,-
"
;.'(
~"'f ..,.1it,.''-''
'~~~ ~... ,.,~~\. ,,:-:t;<
~'..
"
.
,,'
<
;
"
.'?\..
,"
j..:: \.)'
.,-
,',- .'
,.
\
\,
,
.
':,.;
1'"
,
,
..-
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
I
,
,
,
,
.
,
.
'A,
~ \.
,
,
,
1)
-.q-
..r->
""
, "
~'\
~
-.\
>.
) ,""
,<""'.
.~,-
, .
0-;:.
"
~\
"..;,"i
,
';;' "~:':.;;
,-~
. ,..:..,~r
-/..,
,.
,
'"
'. "
~ " '"-'~t~
- ~''';~
,','
"~'\.<~ ;,:'".:
-j'"
---------~
------,,-
~ lli ~ fu ~ry ~ rnl,n
o 1\\\\1
5~:'!
JUlI ~ .,.
\
RECREA nON & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-327
\'VoNN1NG AND
lONING DEPT.
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent r
Boynton Commons PCD - New Site Plan, 2nd review
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
July 15, 1996
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the Boynton Commons PCD - New Site Plan.
There are no recreation related comments, The project may continue through the normal review
process,
JW
~=n
Kimley,Horn
and Associates, Inc,
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
BOYNTON COMMONS PCD
BOYNTON BEACH, FL
Prepared for:
Boynton Commons Corporation
Boca Raton, FL
040083,00
July 1995
Revised August 1995
Revised April 1996
Revised May 1996
Revised July 1996
iO Kimley~Hom and Associates, Inc.
~=~
fI1t'
?!~
Kimley'Horn
and Associates, Inc,
Engineering
Planning
and
Environmental
Consultants
August 25. 1995
Revised April 22, 1996
Revised May I, 1996
Revised July 18, 1996
Mr, Donald B. Stiller
Boynton Commons Corporation
7040 West Palmetto Park Road-2
Suite 302
Boca Raton, Florida 33433
Re: Boynton Commons PCD
Boynton Beach, Florida
Dear Mr, Stiller:
We are pleased to submit our revised traffic impact analysis report for the
proposed project to be located on the west side of Congress Avenue between
Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road in the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida,
It has been a pleasure working with you on this project. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call,
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC,
d:~~
Project Manager
Florida Registration
Number 47038
.
TEL 407 845 0885
FAX 407 883 8175
.
4431 Embarcadero Dri....e
Wesl Palm Beach,Florida
33407
~=~
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
INTRODUCTION
, , , ' , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , " 1
INVENTORY AND PLANNING DATA, , , , , , , , ' , , , , , , . , , , , , " 2
PROJECT TRAFFIC , ' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , ' , , , , , , , " 4
Traffic Generation , """"""""".."""",." 4
Traffic Distribution """""",......"""""", 4
TrafficAssignrnent "."""""""",."""..", 6
BACKGROUND TRAFFIC """""".""""",.""" 7
ASSURED CONSTRUCTION , , , , , , , , , . , . , , , , , . . , , , , , , , , , ., 8
LINK EVALUATION ,....""""".""""""""", 9
Alternate Test I """...."""""""""""" 9
Test 2 , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , ' . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ' , , ' , , , ' 14
DRIVEWAY CLASSIFICATION AND TURN LANE REQUIREMENTS , IS
Driveway Classification , , , , , , , , , . , , . , , , . . , , , , , , , , , . , 15
Turn Lane Requirements """,.""""""""",. 16
CONCLUSION. , . . , , , ' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ' , , , , , , , . , , . , . 18
APPENDIX
04008300,R0596
Page i
~=n
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc,
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No.
~
Page
1 Site Location Map ..........................' 3
2 Significant Impact Daily Link Analysis , , , , , , , , , , , ' , , 12
3 Peak Hour Site Access Traffic , , , , . , , , , ' , ' , , , , , , , , 17
LIST OF TABLES
Table No.
~
Page
1 Trip Generation """"""".""""""., 5
2 Average Daily Traffic Link Analysis (Test 1) , , ' , ' , , , , , 10
3 Average Peak Hour Traffic Link Analysis , , , , , , , , ' , , . 11
4 Alternate Test 1 Analysis , , . , , , , , , , , , , ' , . , , , , , . . 13
04008300,R0596 Page ii
~=n
Kimley.Horn
and Associates, Inc,
INTRODUCTION
The Boynton Commons PCD is located on the west side of Congress Avenue
between Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road in Boynton Beach,
Florida, The proposed site plan consists of 213,650 square feet of general
commercial retail.
Kimley-Hom and Associates, Jnc, was retained to prepare a traffic impact analysis
for the project. This document presents the methodology used and the findings of
these analyses,
The traffic impact analysis was conducted in accordance with the 1990 Traffic
Performance Code of Palm Beach County, The analysis used current data available
from Palm Beach County, The buildout year for the proposed development is 1998,
04008300.R0596
Page I
~=n
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc,
INVENTORY AND PLANNING DA TA
Inventory
The data used in this analysis were obtained from Palm Beach County, They
included:
. 1995 24-hour traffic volumes
. 1994/1995 intersection turning movement counts
. Roadway geometrics
. Approved development traffic
. Historic count data
The location of the site is shown in Figure I,
Planning Data
Information on the site was provided on a copy of the proposed site plan prepared
by Land Design South, Access to the development will be provided through one
access driveway on Old Boynton Road, one driveway on Congress A venue and two
on Winchester Park Boulevard, The two driveways on Winchester Park Boulevard
will provide full access, The driveway on Old Boynton Road will provide right-
in/right-out access and the Congress Avenue driveway will provide right, in/right,
out and left-in access,
04008300,ROS96
Page 2
HYPOLUXO RD.
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD.
ci
..
'"
u
z
..
..
..
:3
u
~
~
~
IiiJ
I
NOT TO SCALE
",\TPIC1\4OCIL1DO\.....-COW <-"-0.
~
~
~
r.
5
'i
GATEWAY BLVD.
OLD BOYNTON RD.
WOOLBRIGHT RD.
~
~
~
,.
..
~
:J
'i
23rd AVE.
ci
..
~
u
z
~
f
:l
SITE
~ ...,
I ,
i j
L.. ..j
...
i1C
OIl
OIl
~
..
'"
z
o
u
ci
..
~
g
..
'"
'"
%
ci
::;
..
OIl
..
1.
Iii
...
..
~
OIl
WINER RD.
GATEWAY BLVD.
~
z
~
;:
...
iE
oj
::;
on
..
1.
ci
::;
..
Iii
...
..
u
;:\
OIl
FIGURE 1
BOYNTON COMMONS PCD
SITE LOCATION MAP
~=~ =~~,I~
0040083.00
TABLE 1
BOYNTON COMMONS pcn
TRIP GENERATION
Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Trips Total In Out Total In Out
Prono!led Site Traffir
Commercia! Retail 213,650 S,F, 11,358 254 160 94 1,064 532 532
Pass~By Traffic
Commercial Retail 40.29% 4,576 102 64 38 429 214 214
Net New External 6,782 152 % 56 635 318 318
Note: Trip generation was calculated using the following data:
Daily Traffic Generation
Commercial Retail [P,B.C,j ~ Ln(T) = 0,625 . Ln(A) + 5,985
AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation
Commercial Retail nTE 8201 ~ Ln(T) ~ 0,589 . Ln(A) + 2,378 ; (63%in/37%out)
PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation
Commercial Retail nTE 820] = Ln(T) = 0,637 . Ln(A) + 3.553 ; (50%in/50%out)
09:36AM
04/22/96
FiRn.me:boyIIto.....bl
~=n
Kimley.Horn
and Associates, Inc,
Traffic Assignment
The distributed external trips for the project in 1998 were assigned to the roadways
within the radius of influence, both in terms of daily external trips and A,M, and
p ,M, peak hour volumes.
Based on the net impact of the project, it was determined that the maximum radius
of development influence for Test I of the traffic performance standards is three (3)
miles, The maximum radius of development influence for Test 2 is three (3) miles,
04008300,R0596
Page 6
........-n
~--
Kimley'Horn
and Associates, Inc,
BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
Background traffic is comprised of two components:
. Traffic from the unbuilt portions of approved major developments
. Historical growth
A review of major developments in the area indicated that no major projects would
contribute greater than ten percent (10%) of the level of service standard on any
link significantly impacted by the project during its buildout time frame,
According to the requirements of the 1990 Traffic Performance Code of Palm
Beach County, existing traffic volumes were grown by factors determined by a
review of growth data published by Palm Beach County,
The total background traffic was determined for each link within the radius of
influence,
04008300,R0596
Page 7
........-n
........--
Kimley,Horn
and Associates, Inc,
ASSURED CONSTRUCTION
The existing laneage for each link analyzed was identified, A review of the Five-
Year Plans of Palm Beach County and FDOT, as well as those improvements
committed by the developers of projects in the area was made to identify pertinent
roadway improvements,
The Lawrence Road improvement south ofHypoluxo Road to Gateway Boulevard
is scheduled to be widened to five lanes by Palm Beach County in FY 97/98.
Gateway Boulevard is to be widened to six lanes between Military Trail and
Congress A venue by Palm Beach County FY 96/97, Woolbright Road is to be
widened to six lanes between Congress A venue and 1-95 by Palm Beach County in
FY 96/97,
04008300,ROS96
Page 8
~=n
Kimley.Horn
and Associates, Inc,
LINK EVALUA TION
A link performance standard evaluation was undertaken for each link considering
its total traffic volume and the roadway laneage to be in place in 1998, Project
traffic and total traffic for 1998 are shown in Tables 2 and 3 for daily and average
peak hour conditions, Figure 2 depicts the roadway links that are significantly
impacted on a daily basis by project traffic, As can be seen, all except two of the
roadway links upon which the project has significant impact meet the daily level of
service standard through 1998, Table 3 shows that the same two links fail to meet
the average peak hour link standard for 1998,
Alternate Test 1
The two links that failed to meet the daily and average peak hour standards were
then analyzed for peak hour peak season conditions in order to determine if they
would meet the Alternate Test 1. Table 4 shows the peak hour directional link
volumes for these links. As can be seen from Table 4, these links meet the peak
hour link level of service standard,
04008300,R0596
Page 9
.'
ii - 1! . .
~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ . . 0 . ~ ~ . . . .
~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
:It .
.ll
~ " !O ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :: ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ . ~
~ e ~ ;!: ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ;; N ~
~ . N ~ . ~ .. .. ;. ; . ~ 0 0
... ~' i1i i1i ~' ~. ,; '" <:i ::i ~. N g- :!! 1i :<i oO ,; ~' .. i1i ;; " g' '" ~'
... N . - N . N
;;
3 " .'
= . 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . ~ . 0 . ~ ~ *- ~ ~ 0 . 0 ~ . . . . . 0
'I. ~ ::: z z z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z
.!
'"
1i e ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !i ~ ~ 0 0 . ~ ~ ~
~ S ~ ~
e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :. :l ~ ~ ~ 0 . 0 ~ . 0 ~
N . . . 0 .
~ ...
;;
.. 1i ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
, 'eo ,~ ~ 8 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ .. N 0 ~ vi N '" ~ ;; 0 '" ~ . ~ . ~ N N - 0 . " ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ N
~ ~ ~ - N N
-
""
'" . 1i ~
<-'l 0
t:- . e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
:It ~ ...
'"
-
'" ~
i::l ;... . l e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ N N . 0 ~ N
... 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 . <> ~ N ~ ~ - 0 ~ ~ <> <> ~ ~ ~
u ; . . N ~ ;. ; ;; N N ~ N 0 :l ; . ~ N ~ 0
-< '" ;<i i1i i1i ~' '" .. ::i ~. ;;; '" d g. ,; oO ;;; ;;; oO :i ~' .. ~. ~. d d i1i i1i ~
... z . N . N - N N . .
'" -< ~
z ::C
0 z i . "' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "' "' "' "' "' "' "' ~ ~ ~ "' "' ~ ~ ~
.... :;; - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8, 8 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 ~ ~ ~, ~
. . .
<-'l :;; ... " ~ ~ .. .. - - - = .. '" ~ - - - - - . vi vi - ,.; ,.; . - - - - - - - -
... 0 u
=> -
-< u ... ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 Si ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ 8 8 ~ . ~ ~ 2 2 ~ ~ 0
... ~ N N N ~ ~
"" z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :l ~ ~ ;:: . N ~ ;; ~ ~ 0
0 ;:i ". ~. '" ~' ~' ~ .; ~' g. g- oO ~ '" ,; " ~' i1i i1i oO ~ ~ vi ~. ~. ~. ~. ~ 1i 1i ;<i
N N N N N N
""
Z ""
;... ;... 1- .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~. ~ 8 8 8 8 ~ 8 ~, ~. ~ ~, ;. ~
0 ... ~ 'i .. . . . . .
- ~ '" '" '" '" '" ,; ~' '" '" '" 0' 0' ,; ~' ~. ~. ,; '" 0' vi ~'
=> ~ 0 il t=. N N N N N . . . . . . N N . . . N N . . . . .
...
'" II j ~
" = " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 9 9 " " " " " " " "
;:i '. ~ ... ... ... ... ~ ~ ~
, N ... ... ... ... ... N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;i ;i ~ N N ;i ... ... ... ... ... ~ ...
, i <; . . . . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0
'" u
;>
-<
~ ~ ] 1 ~ ~
t t t t
g g ~ .. .. 'll ..
" '" " '2 1 1 0 '2 .li '2 .li
! ] "! ~ g '" "! ~ 6 .:l t '" .:l '2 t .:l 11
~ 1 '" ~ ~ .:l 1 .:l "
'" . . ..
'" ~ ] '" > ~ .. ~ 0 0 0 5
< " B ~ < '" g ! < 0 '" 0 '" ~ '2 '" 0 '" ..,
~ ... '" ;;: 0 E ~ >
~ " j . ~ j . ~ . ~ 0 ~ 0 ,. .:l r ~ :> <
~ ] ~ E ~ ~ 0
ii '" j '" '" ~ . '" ~
~.., 0 ~ ~ '8
~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ II ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ;s ~
. <3 ;;: ~ ;;: 0 i! ;;: 0 is ~ ~ ~ is is i! is 0 "
... u '" u ~ '" '" '" N
1 'll 'll 1 'll
t ]
1! t .. t g
~ .. 0 '" !
. ] 0 ~ '" ~ g 1 ..
g 11 " t '" g 11 1 g ! ] i . 11 '" I 11 .li 11
1! ] 11 ~ 0 .. 11 ~ .:l t t .:l ] .:l
. .:l 1 0 . ~ 1 .:l ~ . . g .. 1 . 8. .. ] 0 ~
. '" > 0 - '" ~ '! ~ . .. ~ > ~ 0 0 0 . 0 a '"
t < . ~ ~ < . 0 . < '" ~ 1 ~ X- 11 ~
B '" B ~ j . ~ '" '" . '" ~
-; . ~ ~ . '" ... i ~ ~ '" . . ~ ~ ~ i ~ ;;-
0 ~ . I . i i ~ ... i ~ ~ ... ~ :>
Ii, " . j ,~ j 0 i Ii, 0 0 0
, '" g '" '" i ... '" . i! '" i! 8. l ! '" ~
~ . u ~ ~ ~ ~
. e ~ ~ -3 ~ i . ~ ~ 't , ~ is . ~ ~ ~
i i i! j ;;: 0 . i! ;;: <3 is ~ ~ 0 *- is 0 0 X- i! is 0
~ ... u iil ~ u ~ u . i '" . z " '" ~
~ ~ '8 ;;; .
~ .s is '" " ~ ;;; ... <3
~
f
E
E
~
.
,
.
!
i
j
"
'"
~
'"
>
""
-<
z
-<
Q:.o:
ua::;
0.""
"'u
z~
0'"
"':;:'"
~:;:~
=0..
-<uc::
..z~
00
..=
Z:.o:
>-<
o~
"'0.
~
Co?
~
~
~
-<
.'
~H
o
to 'i e
~ ~ l!
~
.
~ a.::
oi!
..
1! 15=
'~
~ ~
.
Ii i i
~n
'"
li i e
i ! ~
'li
. u
~ . e
!: .: ::
u ~
.
"
~ .
i 'S
" ..
. .
~ " .
!: S =
< t
~ .E'
00 ~
8 ~
1 J ~
's e "
. ....
a z <5
~ .
; e
1l ..
.
..
g :;0 ;t
. ~ ~
N N' N
. . .
z z z
'" ~ ~
n~
_ ..,. N
000
~ :g :g
N..... N
~ ~ 5
. . .
~- ~ ~
_ N ...;
~. ~ ~.
_ N' N
~ ~ ~
.
~
~
~ ~
'" '::
. "
e ~
~
c..,~
8 x ~
'E 1i ~ 1i
" ~ ~ ~
UH
i ..J U :E
.
"
;:: ~ ~ :::
~ N
:}:.3;Q
~ ~ ~ >:
r;; ~ ~ ::!
nn
0'1 .... '" N
o (;> 0 <=>
~ 0 0
~ 5 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
:;:: ~ ~ ...;
~. ~ ~ ;:
12 12 12 ~
~- ;:;- ~. ~-
:3 9 9 ~
. . .
1: ~
t ~
:; "3
. .
" . "
] ~ fi .<:
,a:: lI. .. !
H i~
~ ~ 8 i
~ 1l
: - ~
.. . .
g i- !
h]
~
(;
;:: )!. >. )!. ::. ;:: ~
r- N '" ..,. ; g N '"
~s~~::.=.~~
,.;...; ..... .O'," " ,_, " -
>: ::: ;:: ;:: ;:: ~ ~ ~
~ ~ E E ! ~ r;; ~
nnUn
r-: V'> ;:::; ~ ~ ~ a\ ,..;
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
<"'l .... M .... 00"" 5i:
~.~...,....!~.~.:.
g; ~
"! ~
= .
~ ~
~ ~
~~E~~~;!~.
N.N.....~N.....~_
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
..,.' ..,.' ..,.' ..; ..; ..,.' ...f f,f
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,
... ..J ..J ..J ..J ...l ..J ..J
'" '" '" '" '" '" ..,. ..,.
1:
~
..
.
" .1l
1i ~ 2 ~
~ ~ .. ~ ~
~ 8 n.
i~u~i
~~~8i5~
1
g
" 8
~ .
.. ~
~ '"
.fi ~
~ e
1:
~
~
'I ~
.. ..
n
H
~
n
! ~ ~
ii ! ~
~ :i i
:: u :=
iliJ:::?!
~
nn
1: ~
~ ~
~ '"
. G
i 11
o ..
;.
~
~
N'
~
::l
"
~
o
:ii
N
"
8
~
N
~
.;
o
...
~
~
5:
;.
~,
.
,.
"
~
o
~
N
:>
'"
N
~
~
.
~
:}
...
N
~
5:
8 'I
. ..
> c
'" ~
lei
8 is
1 8 8 1
gl! ! g
"~H q~
~f.~~~~!
~J:a8~8!~
~ ~ ~
;.
.;. ~
~ ~
~- ~-
'" :5: ;1l ~
i5 ~ ~::
.;. *-
J! :!: ~ >:
~ ::
::: ~ 0 ;q
~ ~
~ N
UU
N II'> 0 ""
o 0
o 0 0 0
N N
~ 00
N ~ ~ II'>
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ '"
~ ~ ~ ~
- ,..; .... ....
~ ~
NN
~ ~. ~. ~
~ ~
..;: ..;:
:::: ;;:: ;;:: ;;::
~. ~ ~. ~.
o 0
~ ~
:i :i :i :i
1:
~
g
'1i "
~ ~
" .
~ "
~ .
" ~
~ ~
(; "
1:
~
11 g
~ " 'I
" 1 ~
~ ~ ~
1;' s or>
" . -
6i~
1 1
o
" ~! 11 g
11 ~ 0 i:Q
~ ~ _ IX ~
~ 1 11 S ~ !
1;'~~i~g
~Z!~i~~
o f zoo i:Q
~
...
~
>: >: >: >: ~ >:
~
,
~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~.~ ~
NNN. NNN
o
~ >: >: >: > ; ~ ~
::: ~ :;:; ~ ~ :2 ~ :::
n~~Uu
N \D <J', :! .... ::: .... N
o 0 0 <;0 0 0 0 0
~.~.~.~~.!~.~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~.~~~~
~ S 6
N N N
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
N.N..;:......;:....
Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl
0;# ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1:
~
1 ] ~ 1
g c ~ ~ !
11 r:c ~ ~ ~!
~ f i ~ J! Cl
c ~ ~ t' g ~
~ Cl 0 CCl ~ n
'll
~
] '1i
. & 0
E :t ~
> ~ .
-< 0 .=
! ~ ~
"z x
.
e
1:
~ .
"Q "Q g ~
~ ~ c:l 11 <
g~.1~~
] i:Q CCl i ~
j.... t' ~ ] 0
~ ~ ~ g ..s
~ 0 ~ ~ ~
i
,
f
.
I
j
~
HYPOLUXO RD.
~ ci ci
/;; OJ '" ~
ci ... CD
~ '" >:;~~9 " on ..
:J ... C GO '"
:;; u .."'.. .. 1. ...
z !l! '"
... :z: ~
; "
;;: on
::!
WINER RD.
0 N
>..~....J >~$!g9
N_<<!.~
!!? Cl a) Cl
~
GATEWAY BLVD, ~
N '"
~mcoe '"'
>......(0...1 ;:
~ _m..:co ...
.."'''' ~ U; @
N ZIO~~cd
"'''0 Y >~~~9 Y
>~r---~..J Y 5%
""'''' Y -~NCD 23% oj
~ 9% 17% 334 ~ 1560 :;
610 1153 (13,747) (42,478)
Y (15,290) (14,5611 4LD . 6LD N
7% 4LD 4LD \ 9%
475 , .-.., 610
(43,477) OLD BOYNTON RD. SITE ! 1 (30,662)
6LD ' I 4LD
, ,
L.. ,J
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD. Y I:J Y
Y
ci 15% 21% 23%
'" 1017 1424 1560 ci
:z: (33,1601 (35,6311 1289 (31,0971 ~
u
z CD
.. 6LD 6LD (35,4981 6LD on l;;
'" 6LD GO
'" 1. ...
_0; Y '"
3 "'~ u
>;rtr---"'lt..J 5% ..
u .NON >~~:;.9 ...
'"' S 339 '"
... __OCl (28,532)
WOOLBRIGHT RD. ~ 6LD
lONe Y
3%
>;rtr---ot...l 203
,....~mCD
'"' ~ (11,459)
~ 23rd AVE. 2L
..
>- w
'" ~
~
:J '"
:;; '"
...
~
z
0
u
~
~
J
LEGEND
Y
N
lAEETS STANDARD
DOES NOT lAEET STANDARD
PERCENT PROJECT TRAFFIC
PROJECT TRAFFIC
3%
203
(11,459)
6lD
TOTAL TRAFFIC
LANE GEOlAETRY
NOT TO SCALE
H,\""",,~"""-COli'_20_..
FIGURE 2
BOYNTON COMMONS PCD
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
DAIL Y LINK ANALYSIS
~_n Kimley-Hom
~_u andHsocl8l8s,1nc.
.
040083.00
rIl
-
e~
=-:;2
~~
:~;:
...lo~
~u!-<
!-<ZIOl
O!-<
~-<
>-~
0101
=~
-<
- .'
i! ~ -;
U ...... l!
~ ~ ~
oc i IS
E ~ e
..
1i is
'f e
.. ..
5 i i
t 'f .~
~ Do, ~
.2. i! e
.: 'f e
~ .. ..
..
.
oc e e
~ " ~
X ..
..
.e .
. ..
e .
" .:
g: ~ ~
~ .. ..
.. ..
~
-
~ ~-=
~ !. ~
... <:l
~
J t ~
's 'S :;
. = ...
d z 0:
~ .
. e
.. ..
.
~
~
~
~
~
'e
~ i
~ g
..c 11%1
J & ~
Cl In tt ~
s 3: ~ r3
~ =
.g ...
~
s
~
....
8
'"
o
N
~
'"
8
~
~
:~
~
N
N
9
~
]
>
.
B
..
i
.
~
.
.
>-
~
N
~
~
....
>I
~
o
~
N
~
'"
N
~
..;
"'
~
:;:
~
o
~
~
...
N
1i
~
=
..
~
..
..
(5
'e
~ j
~ '5
~ i ~
~ i "
~
iil
:::
~
N
'"
o
o
'"
o
~
:::
....
~
~
~
::
o
N
N
9
~
]
.
B
..
"
~
n
~
~
~
N
~
:::
....
8
.;
o
~
o
~
....
N
~
..;
~
:;;
..
o
~"
...
N
]
i
..
..
(5
]
.
.. B
. '"
~ ~
t ~
~ ~
.
.
...
~
'"
~
~
o
.
~
,5
'"
u
is
~
u
5
.
~
...
'"
~
.
i
~
~
~
~
~
.
.
.
j
!
.
.
~
~=n
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc,
In addition to the link level of service analysis, intersection critical volume analyses
were also conducted and are included in the Appendix, All existing intersection
volume data was provided by Palm Beach county, The counts were adjusted to
peak season (if necessary) and grown to the 1998 buildout year. The worksheets
in the Appendix show the development of total 1998 intersection traffic, The
intersections associated with these links were then analyzed for adequate capacity
during the A,M, and P,M, peak hours,
The critical volume analysis worksheets show that all but one intersection operate
under the standard capacity of 1,400 vehicles considering the existing lane
geometry, The intersection at Lawrence Road and Gateway Boulevard operates
under the standard capacity of 1,400 vehicles with Gateway Boulevard
improvements which are to be in place by 1998,
The links that fail the daily link test therefore meet Alternate Test I,
Test 2
The Model Test 2 indicates a radius of influence of three miles from the site, No
links listed in Modified Table 5 of the Performance Standard Code are within the
project's radius of influence,
04008300,R0596
Page 14
~=n
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc,
DRIVEWA Y CLASSIFICA TION AND
TURN LANE REQUIREMENTS
Driveway Classification
According to the Palm Beach County "Guide Parking Lot and Street Access Design
Criteria and Standards", it is necessary to classify project entrances as minor,
intermediate, or major according to the following criteria:
\, Minor - Provides for a maximum average daily traffic of 500.
2, Intermediate - Provides service for a maximum average daily traffic
from 501 to 2,000,
3, Major - Provides service for a maximum average daily traffic greater
than 2000.
Using these criteria, the northern two driveways on Winchester Park Boulevard and
the driveway on Congress Avenue would be classified as major, The driveway on
Old Boynton Road would be classified as intermediate,
04008300,R0596
Page \5
~=n
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Tum Lane Requirements
Figure 3 presents the proposed project AM and PM peak hour total volumes
assigned to the project's access driveways, Consideration of these volumes with
respect to the Palm Beach County access design standards results in the
determination that left-turn and right-turn ingress lanes will be required at the two
driveways on Winchester Park Boulevard and the driveway on Congress Avenue,
04008300,R0596
Page 16
~
~
I
NOT TO SCALE
""""""_COlI 1_11_"
OLD BOYNTON RD.
(35) 10 ~ roo
$!
N
!!!
",
I
I
,
I
I
I
NI
"':
;;;1
"':
Jl
~
113181
CD
~
~
I ~14(80)
~~12 (77)
128961
It
!?:i
/~
R I
~
::: i
, 1~6 (37)
~ ,~15 (67)
it 123701
:....
I~
'co
it::
, .----..-------
,
I I
.______________________________________1
147741
(179) 31 -.j
SITE
I u;
N
I t:
I
,
,
..;
>
..
on
on
...
'"
<>
z
o
u
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD.
LEGEND
15 AM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
(67) PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME
123701 DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME
FIGURE 3
BOYNTON COMMONS PCD
PEAK HOUR SITE ACCESS TRAFFIC
~_n Kimley-Hom
-....J_U and AssocIat8s, Inc.
.
0040083.00
~=n
Kimley,Horn
and Associates, Inc,
CONCLUSION
This traffic impact analysis shows that the proposed Boynton Commons pcn
development meets Palm Beach County's Traffic Performance Standards,
04008300,R0596
Page 18
~=~
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc,
APPENDIX
INTERCHANGE ANALYSIS SHEET
BOYNTON COMMONS PCD
BOYNTON BEACH BOlJI"EV ARD @ 1-95 INTERCHANGE
(Existing Geometry)
Growth Rate ~
Peak Season =
Buildout Year ~
Years =
1.00%
1.00
1998
3
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Volume Development
Nortbbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
LT Tbru RT LT Thru RT LT Tbru RT LT Tbru RT
Existing Volume (1995) 309 0 127 302 2 398 458 662 629 323 532 283
Peak Season Volume 309 0 127 302 2 398 458 662 629 323 532 283
Background 318 0 131 311 2 410 472 682 648 333 548 292
Major Projects Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Traffic 5 0 0 5 0 0 3 7 3 0 12 0
Total 323 0 131 316 2 410 475 689 651 333 560 292
Critical Volume Analysis
No, of Lanes 2 I 0 I 1 2 I 0 I 1 1 I 2 I I 1 I 2 I 1
Aooroach Volume 454 728 1,815 1,185
Per Lane Volume 88 I 0 I 131 84 I 0 I 410 475 I 345 I 651 333 I 280 I 292
North-South Critical NB Critical "" 88 EB Critical - 475
East,West Critical S8 Critical- 84 WB Critical "" 333
Maximum Critical Sum 172 + 808 = 980
STATUS?
UNDER
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Volume Development
Nortbbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
LT Tbru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Tbru RT
Existing Volume (1995) 590 0 421 228 I 439 452 840 463 181 870 345
Peak Season Volume 590 0 421 228 I 439 452 840 463 181 870 345
Background 608 0 434 235 1 452 466 865 477 186 896 355
Major Projects Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Traffic 16 0 0 16 0 0 16 38 16 0 38 0
Total 624 0 434 251 1 452 482 903 493 186 934 355
Critical Volume Analysis
No. of Lanes 2 0 I 1 2 0 I 1 1 I 2 I 1 1 I 2 I I
Approach Volume 1,058 704 1,878 1,475
Per Lane Volume 238 0 I 434 52 I 0 I 452 482 I 452 I 493 186 I 467 I 355
North,South Critical NB Critical- 238 EB Critical - 482
East-West Critical sa Critical = 52 WB Critical "" 467
Maximum Critical Sum 290 + 949 = 1,239
STATUS?
NEAR
04.17PM 05120/96
Fi"'nalM:boynton.wbl
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
BOYNTON COMMONS PCD
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD @ SEA CREST BOULEVARD
(Existing Geometry)
Growth Rate =
Peak Season =
Buildout Year =
Years =
1.00%
1.00
1998
3
Noon Peak Hour
Intersection Volume Development
Nortbbound Soutbbound Eastbound Westbound
LT Tbru RT LT Tbru RT LT Tbru RT LT Tbru RT
Existing Volume (1995) 211 169 48 58 338 187 79 465 203 34 371 36
Peak Season Volume 211 169 48 58 338 187 79 465 203 34 371 36
Background 217 174 49 60 348 193 81 479 209 35 382 37
Major Projects Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Traffic 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 3 0
Total 219 174 49 60 348 195 82 481 210 35 385 37
Critical Volume Analysis
No, of Lanes 1 I 2 I <0 1 T 2 T <0 1 I 2 I <0 1 I 2 I <0
Approach Volume 442 603 773 457
Per Lane Volume 219 I 112 I n/a 60 I 272 T n/a 82 I 346 n/a 35 I 211 I n/a
North-South Critical NB LT+SBTH- 491 SB LT+NBTH t72
East,West Critical EB LT+WBTH- 293 WB LT+EBTH- 381
Maximum Critical Sum 491 + 381 = 872
STATUS?
UNDER
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Volume Development
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
LT Tbru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT
Existing Volume (1995) 410 407 88 50 223 149 246 635 210 72 643 57
Peak Season Volume 410 407 88 50 223 149 246 635 210 72 643 57
Background 422 419 91 52 230 154 253 654 216 74 662 59
Major Projects Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Traffic 6 0 0 0 0 6 6 10 6 0 10 0
Total 428 419 91 52 230 160 259 664 222 74 672 59
Critical Volume Analysis
No. of Lanes I I 2 I <0 I T 2 T <0 I I 2 I <0 1 I 2 I <0
Approach Volume 938 442 1,145 805
Per Lane Volume 428 I 255 I n/a 52 T 195 T n/a 259 I 443 I n/a 74 I 366 I n/a
North,South Critical NB LT+SBTH- 623 SB LT+NBTII= 307
East,West Critical EB LT+WBTII- 625 WB LT+EBTII= 517
Maximum Critical Sum 623 + 625 = 1,248
STATUS?
NEAR
04:13PM 04121/96
File".llIc:boynton.wbl
Growth Rate ~
Peak Season =
Buildout Y ear ~
Years =
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
BOYNTON COMMONS PCD
LAWRENCE ROAD @ GATEWAY BOULEVARD
(Existing Geometry)
7.22%
1.00
1998
3
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Volume Development
Nortbbound Soutbbound Eastbound Westbound
LT Tbru RT LT Tbru RT LT Tbru RT LT Tbru RT
Existing Volume (1995) 40 180 150 137 218 30 41 658 84 124 349 133
Peak Season Volume 40 180 150 137 218 30 41 658 84 124 349 133
Background 49 222 185 169 269 37 51 811 104 153 430 164
Major Projects Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Traffic 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Total 49 224 186 169 271 37 51 811 104 154 430 164
Critical Volume Analysis
No, of Lanes 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I <0 1 1 I <0
Approacb Volume 459 477 966 748
Per Lane Volume 49 224 186 169 271 37 51 I 915 I nla 154 I 594 I nla
North-South Critical NB LT+SBTH- 320 SB LT+NBTH- 393
East-West Critical EB LT+WBTH- 645 WB LT+EBTH- 1069
Maximum Critical Sum 393 + 1069 = 1,462
STATUS?
OVER
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Volume Development
Nortbbound Soutbbound Eastbound Westbound
LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Tbru RT LT Thru RT
Existing Volume (1995) 74 305 58 87 168 66 64 238 33 51 338 163
Peak Season Volume 74 305 58 87 168 66 64 238 33 51 338 163
Background 91 376 71 107 207 81 79 293 41 63 417 201
Major Projects Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Traffic 0 II 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
Total 91 387 76 107 213 81 79 293 41 66 417 201
Critical Volume Analysis
No, of Lanes I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I <0 1 I 1 I <0
Approach Volume 554 401 413 684
Per Lane Volume 91 I 387 I 76 107 T 213 T 81 79 I 334 I nla 66 I 618 I nla
North-South Critical NB LT+SBTH- 304 SB LT+NBTH- 494
East-West Critical EB LT+WBTH 697 WB LT+EBTH 400
Maximum Critical Sum 494 + 697 - 1,191
STATUS?
UNDER
09:54AM 04J22196
Filename:boynton.'Wbl
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
BOYNTON COMMONS PCD
LAWRENCE ROAD @ GA TEW A Y BOULEVARD
(Future Geometry)
Growth Rate =
Peak Season =
Buildout Year =
Years =
7.22%
1.00
1998
3
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Volume Development
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT
Existing Volume (1995) 40 180 150 137 218 30 41 658 84 124 349 133
Peak Season Volume 40 180 150 137 218 30 41 658 84 124 349 133
Background 49 222 185 169 269 37 51 811 104 153 430 164
Major Projects Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Traffic 0 2 I 0 2 0 0 0 0 I 0 0
Total 49 224 186 169 271 37 51 811 104 154 430 164
Critical Volume Analysis
No. ofLanes I I I I I I I I I I I I 3 I <0 I I 3 I <0
Approach Volume 459 477 966 748
Per Lane Volume 49 I 224 I 186 169 I 271 I 37 51 I 305 I nla 154 I 198 I nla
North-South Critical NB LT+SBTH- 320 SB LT+NBTH- 393
East-West Critical EB LT+WBTH 249 WB LT+EBTH- 459
Maximum Critical Sum 393 + 459 = 852
STATUS?
UNDER
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Volume Development
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT
Existing Volume (1995) 74 305 58 87 168 66 64 238 33 51 338 163
Peak Season Volume 74 305 58 87 168 66 64 238 33 51 338 163
Background 91 376 71 107 207 81 79 293 41 63 417 201
Major Projects Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Traffic 0 11 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
Total 91 387 76 107 213 81 79 293 41 66 417 201
Critical Volume Analysis
No,ofLanes I I I I I I I I I I I I 3 I <0 I I 3 I <0
Approach Volume 554 401 413 684
Per Lane Volume 91 I 387 I 76 107 I 213 I 81 79 I 112 I nla 66 I 206 I nla
North-South Critical NB LT+SBTH- 304 SB LT+NBTH- 494
East-West Critical EB LT+WBTH 285 WB LT+EBTH- 178
Maximum Critical Sum 494 + 285 = 779
STATUS?
UNDER
02:06PM 04/22/96
Filea.llle:boyatCtD.wbl
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
BOYNTONCO~ONSPCD
LAWRENCE ROAD @ OLD BOYNTON ROAD
(Existing Geometry)
Growth Rate =
Peak Season ~
Buildout Y ear ~
Years =
8.18%
1.16
1998
4
AM Peak Hour
Intersection Volume Development
Nortbbound Soutbbound Eastbound Westbound
LT Tbru RT LT Tbru RT LT Tbru RT LT Tbru RT
Existing Volume (1994) 29 124 69 109 321 64 51 271 57 10 92 49
Peak Season Volume 34 144 80 126 372 74 59 314 66 12 107 57
Background 46 197 109 173 509 101 81 430 90 16 146 78
Major Projects Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Traffic 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 9 0 0 6 3
Total 46 197 109 178 509 101 81 439 90 16 152 81
Critical Volume Analysis
No,ofLanes I I I I I I I I I I I I 2 I <0 I I 2 I <0
Approach Volume 352 788 610 249
Per Lane Volume 46 I 197 I 109 178 I 509 I 101 81 I 265 I nla 16 11171 nla
North,South Critical NB LT+SBTH- 555 SB LT+NBTH- 375
East-West Critical EB LT+WBTH- 198 WB LT+EBTH- 281
Maximum Critical Sum 555 + 281 = 836
STATUS?
UNDER
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Volume Development
Nortbbound Soutbbound Eastbound Weotbound
LT Tbru RT LT Tbru RT LT Tbru RT LT Tbru RT
Existing Volume (1994) 74 305 58 87 168 66 64 238 33 51 338 163
Peak Season Volume 86 353 67 101 194 76 74 276 38 59 391 189
Background 117 484 92 138 266 105 101 377 52 81 536 258
Major Projects Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Traffic 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 29 0 0 35 19
Total 117 484 92 154 266 105 101 406 52 81 571 277
Critical Volume Analysis
No,ofLanes I I I I I I I I I I I 2 I <0 I I 2 I <0
Approach Volume 693 525 559 929
Per Lane Volume 117 484 I 92 154 I 266 I 105 101 I 229 I nla 81 I 424 I nla
North,South Critical NB LT+SBTH- 383 SB LT+NBTH- 638
East,West Critical EB LT+WBTH= 525 WB LT+EBTH- 310
Maximum Critical Sum 638 + 525 - 1,163
STATUS?
UNDER
O&;02AM 04122/96
Filea.me:boyntoa.wbl