AGENDA DOCUMENTS
I
/
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
D Preliminary Draft D Revised Draft ~
Final Submittal
Requested City Commission Date Final Fonn Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Fonn Must be
Meeting Dates into City Manager's Office Meeting Dates Turned into City Manager's
0 December 3, 1996 November 25, 1996 0 February 4. 1997 January 29, 1997
0 December 17, 1996 December 11, 1996 0 February 18, 1997 February 12, 1997
0 January 7, 1997 December 30, 1996 0 March 4, 1997 February 29, 1997
0 January 21,1997 January 15. 1997 o March 18, 1997 March 12, 1997
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
o Administration 0 Consent
o Bid 0 Public Hearing
[3 Legal 0 Unfinished Business
ORDINANCE
2ND READING
o Presentation
o New Business
o Other
DESCRIPTION OF
AGENDA ITEM (attach additional sheets and supporting documentation if necessary)
Rezoning /major master plan modification of the Boynton Commons PCD (see attached).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the attached ordinance be approved on second reading.
/_.
--/~ ,jL!.( '~)..llA.lc:L
Department Hea.r( Signature .J
City Manager's Signature
D:ISHAREI WPIFORMSIAGENDASICITYCOMlAGENDANW. WPD
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-656
Agenda Memorandum for
December 17,1996 City Commission Meeting
TO:
Dale Sugerman,
City Manager
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP ?f-d
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
December 11, 1996
SUBJECT: Boynton Commons PCD (REZN 96-001)
Rezoning/Modification of Planned Commercial Development (PCD)
Please place the above-referenced item on the December 17, 1996 City Commission meeting
agenda under Legal - Ordinances, Second Reading.
DESCRIPTION
You will recall that the City Commission, on August 20, 1996 approved this request from Land
Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, to amend the original PCD master
plan to in part, achieve the following: an increase in total square footage from 186,130 to
213,650, the creation of a fourth leased outparcel building using square footage extracted
from the main building, the replacement of the 5,000 square foot leased outparcel bank
building with an 8,000 square foot leased outparcel building, the reduction in the size of the
leased outparcel restaurant building from 7,500 square feet to 5,000 square feet, the
relocation of the drugstore drive-through to the north side of the outparcel building, the
addition of a driveway onto Old Boynton Road, and the deletion of a driveway on Congress
Avenue. As the requested changes constituted a substantial amendment to the approved
master plan, the request is processed as a "rezoning", and therefore must ultimately be
approved and effectuated through an ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the attached ordinance be approved on second reading.
Attachments
xc: Central File
MR:BCOMORD2WPD
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-656
Agenda Memorandum for
December 17,1996 City Commission Meeting
TO:
Dale Sugerman,
City Manager
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP '!Jd
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
December 11, 1996
SUBJECT: Boynton Commons PCD (REZN 96-001)
Rezoning/Modification of Planned Commercial Development (PCD)
Please place the above-referenced item on the December 17,1996 City Commission meeting
agenda under Legal - Ordinances, Second Reading.
DESCRIPTION
You will recall that the City Commission, on August 20, 1996 approved this request from Land
Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, to amend the original PCD master
plan to in part, achieve the following: an increase in total square footage from 186,130 to
213,650, the creation of a fourth leased outparcel building using square footage extracted
from the main building, the replacement of the 5,000 square foot leased outparcel bank
building with an 8,000 square foot leased outparcel building, the reduction in the size of the
leased outparcel restaurant building from 7,500 square feet to 5,000 square feet, the
relocation of the drugstore drive-through to the north side of the outparcel building, the
addition of a driveway onto Old Boynton Road, and the deletion of a driveway on Congress
Avenue. As the requested changes constituted a substantial amendment to the approved
master plan, the request is processed as a "rezoning", and therefore must ultimately be
approved and effectuated through an ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the attached ordinance be approved on second reading.
Attachments
xc: Central File
MR:BCOMORD2'wPD
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-420
Agenda Memorandum for
August 20, 1996, City Commission Meeting
TO:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP ~~
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
August 15, 1996
SUBJECT:
Boynton Commons PCD - REZN 96-001
Please place the above-referenced item on the August 20, 1996 City
Commission agenda under Public Hearing.
DESCRIPTION: Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons
Corporation, contract purchaser, is requesting to amend the
original Boynton Commons PCD master plan to increase the total
square footage from 186,130 square feet to 213,650 separate square
footage from the main building into a fourth, leased outparcel
building, replace the 5,000 square foot leased outparcel bank
building with an 8,000 square foot leased outparcel video store,
reduce the size of the leased outparcel restaurant building from
7,500 square feet to 5,000 square feet, relocate the drugstore
drive-thru to the north side of the outparcel building, add a
driveway onto Old Boynton Road and delete a driveway on Congress
Avenue. Boynton Commons is a planned commercial development to be
located at the southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress
Avenue and is zoned PCD. For further details pertaining to this
request, please refer to attached Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No.96-411.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 7-0
vote, recommended approval subject to all staff comments in Exhibit
"E", Conditions of Approval, with modifications to comments IS, 23
and 46, regarding relocation of Sports Authority, signage and
relocation of parking and deletion of comments 28 and 30, regarding
use of road bumps and closing off certain access aisles. In
addition, staff has generated seven new design-related comments,
since the Planning and Development Board meeting, which have been
generally agreed to by the applicant, to enhance the appearance of
the PCD shopping center and recapture the image that was promoted
with the original application. These new comments have already
been incorporated as comments 50-56 on Exhibit "E".
TJH:dim
Attachments
xc: Central File
C:\WPWIN60\WPDOCS\CCAGDREZ.BOY
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-411
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
THROUGH: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP .-;gtJ
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag
Zoning and Site Plan Administrator
DATE: August 9, 1996
SUBJECT: Boynton Commons PCD - File No. REZN 96-001
Introduction
Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, contract purchaser of the subject
property, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan for the Boynton
Commons Planned Commercial Development (PCD). This 23-acre project, approved on
November 21,1995 for 186,130 square feet of retail space, is located at the southwest corner of
Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map"). The current land
use, which would remain unaffected by the proposed rezoning, is Local Retail Commercial.
Pursuant to the City's Land Development Regulations (Chapter 2, Section 6.F.13), modifications
to an approved planned commercial development which would result in an increase of ten (10)
percent or more in measurable impacts such as traffic created or water consumed, must be
processed through a new application for zoning to peD. As the proposed changes would
represent an increase in water demand equivalent to approximately 12%, a rezoning application
has been submitted, including the necessary master plan documents, and is evaluated herein. Had
the impacts of the proposed changes been projected less than 10%, the request would have been
processed as a master plan modification.
RezoninllJModifications to Master Plan
The specific changes proposed to the approved master plan are as follows (see Exhibit "B" -
approved master plan and Exhibit "C" - proposed master plan):
1. Relocation and a slight decrease in the size of the retention pond;
2. Omission of the south right-in and right-out driveway on Congress Avenue;
3. Addition of a right-in and right-out only driveway on Old Boynton Road;
4. Changing the total project size from 186,130 square feet to 213,650 square feet;
a total increase of 27,520 square feet which is partially attributed to the increase
in size and separation of Major #6 (identified as "Sports Authority") from the
northern cluster of the three (3) larger attached buildings to an isolated location
where the retention pond is proposed to be moved from;
5. Reduction in the size of the leased restaurant outparcel building from 7,500 square
feet to 5,000 square feet;
6. Increasing the size of the leased bank outparcel building from 5,000 square feet to
8,000 square feet, and conversion to a video rental store ("Video Ave. ");
7 . Relocation of the W algreens drive-through feature from the west side to the north
side of the building;
8. Other adjustments in, or redistribution of building square footage, as a result of
)
Page 2
Boynton Commons PCD
REZN 96-001
fmalizing lease arrangements and therefore determination of actual tenant sizes
needed (see Exhibit "D" - Applicant's Justification Statement"). Said adjustments
include a) replacement of the unidentified parcel west of "Major #3" with the
20,000 square foot "Major #4" building, reduced in size and moved from the north
side of the site, b) the increase in size of the "Major #5" building to 38,236 square
feet from 20,000 square feet, and c) the creation of one (1), multi-tenant (6-unit)
building to abut the east side of "Major #5"; and
9. Deletion of the clock tower element situated central to the project.
Adiacent Land Use and Zonin~
The adjacent land uses and existing zoning in the surrounding area varies and is presented in the
table that follows:
Direction ~ ~
North Old ll<Jynton Road n/a
Farther north Boynton Festive Center C-3
East Congress Avenue n/a
Farther east Oakwood Square Shopping Clf. C-3
South L.W.D.D. (L.24) Canal n/a
Farther south developed retail, commercial, utility uses C-3,PU
West Winchesler Park Boulevard n/a
Farther west undeveloped property AG
Histo()' and Present Zonin~
The subject property represented a portio n of the 50 acre "Mall South" site which was annexed,
reclassified and rezoned in June of 1992. The property was reclassified consistent with the
recommended land use shown on the Future Land Use Map; Local Retail Commercial, and zoned
C-3, Community Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element recommended
(and still recommends) that the parcels within Planning Area 7.f (see Consistency with
Comprehensive Plan section below), where possible, be zoned and developed as Planned
Commercial Developments (PCD). On November 21, 1995, the current master plan received
approval in conjunction with a rezoning from C-3 to PCD. Additional information on the original
rezoning to PCD is provided in Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum #95-566.
Analysis - Consistenc;y with Comprehensive Plan
Although the Future Land Use Map would remain unchanged by the proposed rezoning, another
portion of the Comprehensive Plan is applicable to the subject property and is found within
Section VIII. Land Use Problems and Opportunities, of the Future Land Use Element Support
Document. According to Section VIII, the subject property is located within Planning Area 7.f
(which consists of the undeveloped tracts on the east and west sides of Winchester Park
Boulevard), in an area which the City should encourage intensive commercial development". As
indicated in the staff analysis of the original rezoning to Planned Commercial Development, this
requirement for Planning Area 7.f is indicated in the following excerpt from Section VIII (7.t):
"...the parcels be developed as planned zoning districts, where possible, or meet
the intent of the planned zoning district setbacks and greenbelt standards where not
possible, that the City approve any development of regional impact (including
areawide DRls) for these parcels,.... ".
According to the City's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 6.F.l (Intent and
.Y?
~
Page 3
Boynton Commons PCD
REZN 96-00 I
purpose) ,
"Regulations for the PCD are intended to accomplish a more desirable environment
for commercial development in relation to existing and/or future city
development ...." .
Also notable, is that the City's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 6.F.2
(Definition of PCD) defines the PCD according to the following excerpts;
"a. Is land under unified control, planned and developed as a whole in a
single development operation or a programmed series of development
operations for commercial buildings"; and
"b. Provides for a commercial district of efficient and harmonious design so
arranged as to create an attractive project readily integrated with and
having no adverse effect on the adjoining or surrounding areas and
developments" .
Although only a portion of this entire area (known as Planning Area 7. t) which was recommended
for planned development by the Comprehensive Plan, is being master planned at this time, staff
recognized this circumstance when reviewing the original (current) master plan, but also
recognized that the plan's design would allow for possible incremental integration (with respect
to design, circulation etc.) with the remaining undeveloped portions of Area 7.f and particularly,
that portion west of Winchester Park Boulevard. This design attribute was created by aligning
the major, single-tenant buildings on the north and south sides of the site, thereby leaving an open
corridor eastward from Congress Avenue through the site toward the remainder of Area 7.f. This
master plan was construed to be consistent with the above-referenced regulations, and particularly
those portions in bold type above which, in this case, would support the Comprehensive Plan's
recommendation for a unified plan of development within this entire area.
The proposed rezoning includes alterations that lessen these attributes, which consequently,
become inconsistent with recommendations within the Comprehensive Plan and, in part, with the
PCD regulations with respect to facilitating establishment of single or unified development. By
placing a large, single-tenant building in the pathway of the once open corridor of this project,
and in front of the vacant parcel located to the southwest of the site, the ability to integrate the
remainder of Area 7.f with the subject project, is reduced. It also unnecessarily adds another
outparcel to the site; one which exposes the rear of the building to an adjacent right-of-way that
did not have building rears facing it on the approved master plan. By precluding the ultimate
unified design of this entire area, benefits are foregone which include an optimal pedestrian and
vehicular circulation system, integration of small parcels which may otherwise be used marginally
or otherwise left undeveloped, the creation of a more powerful consumer demand or source which
is a significant factor in attracting retail uses, and a unified, more attractive appearance with
respect to building facade and landscaping.
Analysis - Review of Proposed Revisions
As previously indicated, the increase of 27,520 square feet of retail space would generate in
excess of a ten (10) percent increase in water consumed and sewerage collected. The Utility
Department does not object to this projected increase and indicates it will not negatively impact
utility systems. An increase in impervious area, and the relocation and slight decrease in size of
the retention pond is acceptable to the city engineer, subject to the developer's engineer providing
certification that the drainage system is designed in compliance with all city codes and standards.
With respect to traffic, traffic analysis submitted by the applicant has been forwarded to Palm
Beach County Traffic Division for review for compliance with the Palm Beach County Traffic
Performance Standards, but to date a response has not been received from Palm Beach County.
However, on May 22, 1996, Palm Beach County sent a written response to the Planning and
Zoning Department indicating that an improvement to the intersection of Lawrence Road and
'3
Page 4
Boynton Commons PCD
REZN 96-001
Gateway Boulevard is required before more than forty (40) percent of the project traffic is
allowed. The applicant is aware of this condition required by Palm Beach County Traffic
Division. The letter from the county also indicated that the intersection improvement is scheduled
for fiscal year 96/97. Provided this condition is met, the redistribution and increase in square
footage poses no problem.
There are no staff concerns with the deleted Congress A venue driveway, nor the addition of a
right-in and right-out only driveway on Old Boynton Road. A concurrent parking lot variance
has been submitted to reduce the length of the access aisle for the Old Boynton Road entrance
from the required 100 feet to 55 feet.
As for the decreased size of the leased restaurant outparcel building (7,500 square feet to 5,000
square feet), the increase in size of the leased bank outparcel (5,000 square feet to 8,000 square
feet) and the change in this use to a video rental store ("Video Ave. "), there are no staff concerns
with these proposed revisions. However, to remain consistent with the original concept of the
approved master plan, and to remain consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to have
this area developed as a PCD, it is recommended that the leased outparcel building identified as
"Major #5" (a.k.a Sports Authority) remain at the north side of the site in order to maintain an
open corridor between the subject site and the property on the west side of the boulevard. This
open corridor will leave open the potential for the subject project to be integrated with the
eventual design/development of the adjacent vacant property west of Winchester Park Boulevard
and the vacant property located at, and abutting the southwest corner of the project. It will also
minimize views of the rear of the buildings within the center, since the property is bounded on
three sides by major roads and is located in the heart of the city's western commercial area. It
is further recommended that the retention pond be maintained at this location, as proposed within
the currently approved master plan.
Regarding replacing the 45 foot tall clock tower (from the center of the site) with vehicle use area
and parking, staff recommends approval, subject to a lighted fountain being added to the retention
pond. It is further recommended that the lake plantings proposed for the pond be designed to
allow optimum view of the fountain from the public right-of-way and the on-site vehicle use area.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that this rezoning requested by the Boynton Commons Corporation of the
Boynton Commons PCD be approved, subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit "E".
MH:mr
Attachments
xc:Central File
DELL3:BCOMMREZ.REP
1-
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
,
,
II)
11)
--'"
\'l
~
I)
....
"IVIOTCJI=J
.-._~-.
-
.~
I
R1AA
,
,-1
I
Peo
I. .
~ Hrc:z: 17'0,,-, 4~..C'f .
1- 1-:
I I ,....!I~,
. --.....\
, , I
J ; j-r:'PI,
~ ~- -.,0
"" -~,~.. -, r
p
rr U
b
"-, ". ..
" .
, .
. 10-95
EXHIBIT "B"
EXISTING MASTER PLAN
7
1_ r'.- . ~ ..--- .. -. U -- :;c::cr E=lcr r.CuMro
I' I
I I I
I
I
I I
I I
--,
- - -."
!4
". .....
I ffmfi~
I J 11~1 fl~
j ilat"1
: rJU~lli
! ;.~IIJi
I I illtl
II! 1111
I
j . ql
: I i
. .
: I~~ 'IJ
I
I .~h !
I 111r'
I
I ~' .
.q
"T
0 lilt
rfl
Fi!:
q.
t i
. r
I
I
.
.rzfJllC.P
. '- . j.:::
,--.1........
'L_
:- .,
._~
c== .~
-x
li1
t:t~
f'l..
r
f
! I
...."'...
---- ~--- --
- - - - .- - - --
'-.-'r:-' 4- -. _._0
__:1._:1 -'-.-
M....
II
II':
I~ II il
II": 'C
II
iN
.
I
01
~I
;1
!c:=
1==
I.-=:-
r i
I ... . in r-
.... IU ~!'l: - '. - _I I ~
i '- i _ _CIdSaf.IC~Ro~fil_ _: _ _. -,
~ ..-~_. dr
~ liif _.1-.._:;-;...,.... .._u_.._.._. -.._- .j__u_._...__u_.._.._u_ .-1--,,-
g Iii. 0 ~ . filii! I ~ riI 011 1PII'!lllllllnm~ i III
I1II Qm~ t II' i~ I I1IIIII1 pill I '11~lii I ~IJI
!'tI iI ,. II L ~
i II J ., i I!!I II _.;.lIl II liIIdliIIl l~
Sa .........
-
g.!sprrllffi
... II .'FII~.I . ~. I!VAIOIIlaIDl'l"CIl:-'oc
;. ~~L~~ i ::: !l7"~IGII."'1 f.DI;.l
'0 -
'0
~
o
<
III
;:;
iG
II':
n~ ~
'II.:
n~
11'-:
II
CO,"CEF'7u":'_ .
:-;~eTE=c;c, I
"'LAN I
....llCm..AJI.
_,..OlMG
lie"""........
., au..~'"
"'V.'. 1fI'.'U" -
-
.. _.- -..------------.--- ---._-_.._.....~ --.-.--------
\
g
EXHIBIT "C II
PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
1
.
i
.
i ~:
i
jr
~ . ....-............"'..:::. i
. '""'o~~ I
_..__._.'_oo-:-"_~~!:-Ji- :11.bkr~[liROaa. i .a_n_.._..~'._h_.L._.._.._
-..-..-..-..-11-00-"-00_00_00_.'-..-..-.. ..-li-- -
:. n l;j:;: I 00 OO_OO_h_'._.._OO_n_
. .,. I I;IP!I 1111~II~i ;11111 oeu I all~!II'~llillll!~;ml;~1111
~ ~ i~! illl 11=1 1191111 ililtl II I Ilii II iil:lll!i ~ I
~~ I~n .ill!1 S & Sa I II m b milflmi i
il51~lii ~ililt m ~~~i',,~;;[;
..J! .. I ~~. l!Ii~ '~i;!~ ~w _ e; "II 2! !i!-~...~!f"~ie.~ \;"t;;'"
r.: Ii' ;;,;;;/Ili!l I;;:~.. 'G.. jijjij~~U"" .... """ gl!lllr~l!:I~~. "il;lQ.
BOYNTON COMMONS DE~~2-
PREPARED FOR BOYNTON COMMONS. INC. SOUTH_
aOYNTON IlI!AOH. ~l-OAIDA __/lOnd~
-'f-..'.." ..;....-:'..~,'.. -,. '''~' ~'. ,~ :.'" ;$,~..-, .K
~~
Pi8
"'~e~ii1~"lia 't..
l;l a~~h~ s
~ ~~I";~.
~ U~iiE
~ i I;~nl
.. jij::; II EgIS!
?-.:.:.:~.:.:.. . .
ti~~l':itil . ~
-I~;
( ~ ~
II .
~' . 1i~1 ....8~
I ~-'i ~~:\
n
.............,-;:;.":...#..-:..;-
on13eaCh tlO\Jlev.ra-
I
I
I
oj
Ji1 I
~f._.._n_n_... ..
---.. -
~ .:. ~-- m~11
.-. .-III'!
li.1i . ( .
vtis,
lii:1 . i
II III. i
.___ !J i
~:
ptJ
c.
~
~
f.
I:>
~
L!:l
rn
~
1>-
""
~
c.
~
'~i
I'll.; ~
!
f!
3:
::>
c,.
~
r
~
t..
. I!l
~j!~
~ 'I;-~-
~d u
'f! /;
i
!
'"'
~
o
.. t"!" -
II~jJ!iii I
\ U~ibl~1
I ~i iJI,h
. .. ~8~o ;
i .~ i":~ ~
: . i ~i&l ~
I Q~ ~!l~ i
: 3& I~i~. I
I ~l f..~
i i:~ nn ~
I i ~ il i
i Rid
. a Q ~
~ ,...
I~~IW
e~~~~o!
~~lt~J~
iill~]F~~
1t.~&~~
ii~U ~
~5~"~ ~
aq ~&i~~ ~
Ii',; ~~~~g 8
l'lB: '~.,.
n oi! ~
'!i t f.l~ "1
n~ ! ~n
~~~I '
!
i
I
Efj~
-~
"_ n1
c=~
- l>
-:z;
..--
--
H~
IlH
Iii
hi
. -,
-I
.~
!
Ih
);) i"
z I!
0.13
~ 11
~
EXHIBIT "D"
APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION
STATEMENT
II
LAND
DESIGN
SOUTH
Land Planning
Landscape Architecture
Environmental Consultation
WI
PLANNING AND
~ ZONING OEPt
ollJ7~7HS01' FAX417471l{l)12' CongesBuli"essCenler' 1200N. CongesA"""""SUte 215. WesI ""*" Beod1.AondJ:l3<m
July 10. 1996
Mr. Michael Rumpf
City of Boynton Beach
Planning & Zoning Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach. FL 33425
Re: Boynton Commons PCD Rezoning Request - .JustificationlDocumcntlltilln
Dear Mike.
We are presently proposing a rezoning request for the Boynton Commons PCD due to the proposed
increase in square footage. The site is presently zoned PCD. This request is to incrcase the square
footage for the development from 186.130 sq.ft. to 213.650 sq.ft. This increase is necessary to allow
for more display area within the individual users on the site. Please note. as you look at the plan.
that the number of box users and the outparcels has not changed from the previous submittal. just
the floor area has changed.
The revisions to the master plan from the previous approval. are the addition of an access point onto
Old Boynton Rd.. the deletion of an access point onto Congress Ave.. and the shilling around of the
retention area and buildings on the site. The overall master plan concept is still similar to the
previously approved plan.
The proposed rezoning request is primarily for the purpose of adding square footage to the individual
users on the site. This additional square footage has come about through the securing of leases for
the property. More accurate floor plans have been supplied for these individual users. and as a result.
the revised square footage requirements. The number of individual box users. and out parcels has not
changed. but the additional square footage from such building areas as enclosed loading areas.
additional storage areas. and increased display space requirements by these tenants has required this
additional building area.
The proposed rezoning request would increase the previously approved square footage from 186.130
to 213.650. a difference of 27.520 square feet. The individual uses proposed on the site has not
changed from the last submittal except for the previously approved bank site. This has now been
proposed as a retail establishment. The additional traffic that would be generated by this proposed
building area is 98 daily trips. as outlined in the traffic analysis provided by Kimley-Horn and
Associates. Inc. This additional traffic has been reviewed by Palm Beach Count)'. and a response
letter was provided to Ms. Tambri Hayden on this report. May 22. 1996. The increase in water and
sewer usage for the proposed square footage is a difference of 12.1 EDU's based on the City's
calculation rates.
/2-
Mr. Michael Rumpf
July 10. 1996
Page 2
If you have any questions regarding this submittal. please do not hesitate to contact our ol1ice.
Thank you for your cooperation on this matter.
Sincerely,
LAND DESIGN SOUTH
....~
, '---,
.-..-.. ....--~. '-
~~
Project Manager
JDLllp
cc: Don Stiller
letters/rumpl247.rezlFile 24710
/3
EXHIBIT "E"
CONDITIONS OF APPRO V AL
/4
EXHIBIT "E"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Boynton Commons PCD
File number: REZN 96-001
Reference:The plans consist of 4 sheets identified as 2nd Review. Rezoning
File # REZN 96-001 with a July 19. 1996 Plannina and Zonina Denartment date
stamn marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments: NONE
DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
Comments:
L Provide proof of unity of title and those
requirements specified under Chap.2, Sec.
6F3,pg.2-53 and Sec.6F8, pg.2-56.
2. All plans submitted for specific permits shall
meet the City's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include, but are not
limited to the following; site lighting, paving,
drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and
traffic control devices. Permits required from
agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any
other permitting agencies shall be included with
future permit requests.
3 . County road entrance sign requires PBC approval
and state road entrance sign requires FDOT
approval.
4. Show the locations of all temporary structures or
permanent structures having a temporary use.
Provide a statement outlining the temporary use
and when they will be removed. Chap.3, Art. IV,
Sec.3R, pg. 3-5.
5 . Provide a master stormwater management plan.
Chap.3, Art. IV, Sec.3T, pg.3-6.
6 . Provide copy of approved agreement with LWDD for
use of drainage easements. Chap.5, Art.V, Sec.
1D6, pg.5-S.
7. Need SFWMD and LWDD acceptance prior to
Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.5A,
pg.6-7.
8. Provide certification by developer's engineer
that drainage plan complies with all city codes
and standards. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec. SA, pg.6-7 and
Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8.
/5'
Page 2
Rezoning Application
Boynton Commons PCD
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
9. Minimum 15" pipe must be used on storm sewer.
Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7.
10. Parking lot section must conform to city code.
Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.10F, pg.6-12.
1L Provide details on sanitary sewer easements that
are crossed by drainage swales. Chap.6, Art.V,
Sec.4B2b, pg.6-19.
12. Provide details for pavement, grates, pipes,
catch basins, etc. Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2e, pg.
6-20.
13 . County and/or state permits required for
construction in R.O.W. Chap.6, Art. VI I, Sec.4B,
pg. 6-24.
14. Surety requirements of Chap.7, pg. 7-1 must be
met.
15. Not more than two free standing signs are
allowed. Chap.21, Art. IV, Sec.3B, pg. 21-17.
16. Align access paths from sidewalks with H/C
accessible paths including stop bars and signs.
Chap.23, Art.I, Sec.1B5, pg.23-L
17. Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls,
radii, signs, landscaping, etc. must conform with
city codes and standards. Chap. 23, Art. II, pg.23-
6 .
18. Photometrics must be approved for both pedestrian
and parking lot lighting before permit can be
issued. Chap. 23, Art.IIA1a, pg. 23-6.
19. Certify that light poles are in compliance with
Standard Building Code and withstand a 110 mph
wind load. Chap.23, Art.IIA1a, pg.23-6.
20. No trees shall be planted so as to interfere with
lighting fixtures. Chap.23, Art. IIAb, pg. 23-7.
2L Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance
with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices" . Chap. 23, Art.IIB2, pg.23-7.
22. Concrete curb must conform to city standards.
Chap.23, Art.IIE, pg.23-7.
23. Eliminate parking backing directly into major
north/south driveway which serves as a local
street. Chap. 23, Art. I I , Sec.12, pg.23-9.
Suggestion: As an alternate to elimination of
parking, eliminate connection to Old Boynton
Road. A second alternative would be to redesign
entire northwest corner of project, possibly
switching retention area with Major #5 and
Retail/Office.
24. Provide location and details of fire lanes.
Chap. 23 , Art.IIM, pg.23-9.
/~
Page 3
Rezoning Application
Boynton Commons PCD
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
25. Provide fire lane at Walgreens. Chap. 23, Art.
IIM, pg.23-9.
26. Provide continuation of sidewalks through all
driveways to mark pedestrian paths. Chap.23,
Art. II , Sec.P, pg. 23-10.
27. Install WIIA-2 pedestrian signs at all crosswalk
locations. MUTCD 3B-18, pg. 3B-23.
28. Close off every other aisle opening to the north
and south for a safer circulation pattern. The
new areas should be landscaped and curbed.
29. Add stop signs and stop bars throughout the
development where there is a question of right-
of-way. Examples: At each side of Barnes/Noble
for northbound traffic; in the center of the two
Walgreens drive-thru lanes; at both ends of the
two aisles between Video Avenue and Walgreens for
east and westbound traffic.
30. Use city approved road bumps within the major
driveway for speed control.
31. To discourage vehicles parking or standing in the
fire lanes, stripe a six foot wide, cross-hatched
area parallel with the curbed sidewalks
encompassing the words "Fire Lane" (facing
oncoming traffic) .
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: NONE
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
32. Provide a tree management plan (statement) for
the large existing Banyan trees.
33. The lake (detention area) shown on the plan shall
have a lake planting plan and management
document.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
34. Modify the site data to identify that nine (9)
loading zones are required and provided. A truck
well counts as a loading zone.
35. Specify on the master plan drawings" the
dimension of the loading zones in compliance with
the city standards. Also show and identify on
the master plan the location of the block wall
required to screen the service areas at Video
Ave. and Sports Authority outparcel buildings.
/7
Page 4
Rezoning Application
Boynton Commons PCD
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
36. Show and label on the master plan the (10) foot
wide peripheral greenbelt that is required around
the perimeter of the PCD with the exception of
driveway openings and the 269.64 foot property
line located in the southwest portion of the site
that received approval of landscape appeal. The
only improvements allowed within the peripheral
greenbelt area are landscaping and site
wall/buffer wall, where applicable omit the
dumpster enclosure from the greenbelt area along
the south property line.
37. Indicate in the site data found on the master
plan that there are five (5) single tenant
outparcel buildings rather than seven (7) .
38. Indicate in the site data found on the master
plan that there are 836 interior parking spaces
provided and modify the interior required
landscape computations accordingly.
39. Indicate on the master plan a length dimension
for handicapped and regular parking spaces. Also
indicate the width dimension of the handicapped
access aisle that is associated with a
handicapped parking space.
40. To reduce the possibility of someone defacing the
site walls it is recommended that the hedges be
shown on the plans, along the Old Boynton Road
side of the site wall. It is further recommended
that where a site wall is required or proposed
that hedges or vines be planted on the side of
the wall that is closest to the property line.
4l. To properly evaluate the impact the proposed Old
Boynton Road driveway will have on the subject
site, adjacent intersection at Congress Avenue
and the existing driveway leading to the site
located on the north side of Old Boynton Road,
show on the master plan the lane configuration
within Old Boynton Road between Congress Avenue
and Winchester Park Boulevard. Also show the
location, width and lane configuration of the
existing ingress/egress driveway located on the
north side of Old Boynton Road.
42. Modify the master plan to show the final
determination of the parking lot variance, file
number PKLV 96-003, regarding the distance an on-
site access aisle is located from the right-of-
way line at the west major access aisle on Old
Boynton Road. also indicate with a note on the
master plan the file number (PKLV 96-003) and the
date the City Commission made the final
determination.
18
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING 80 DEVELOPt..u:NT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
C. OTHER
Parklna Lot Variance
1.
Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
D~-) _ crb -ODI
f-SI- J
AUGUST 13, 1996
Boynton Commons PCD
Joe Lelonek
Land Design South
Bill Ray Winchester and Elsie A. Winchester
Southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress
Avenue
Request for a variance from the Land Development
Regulations, Chapter 23 - Parking Lots, Article II,
Section H.5 - Clearance at major driveways, to reduce
the required distance of the interior access aisle to
the driveway on Old Boynton Road from 100 feet to
55 feet on the west side of the two-way driveway.
Chairman Dube questioned whether there was a need to discuss the variance since the applicant
is eliminating the driveway.
Joe Lelonek advised that he is following staffs direction by seeking approval. He has no objection
to any of the conditions. When the applicant submits the site plan, the driveway will be eliminated.
Ms. Heyden advised that the master plan which was approved by the board this evening requires
this variance.
Motion
Mr. Aguila moved to approve the request for a variance from the Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 23 - Parking Lots. Article II, Section H.5 - Clearance at major driveways, to reduce the
required distance of the interior access aisle to the driveway on Old Boynton Road from 100 feet
to 55 feet on the west side of the two-way driveway subject to staff comments and subject to the
earlier condition of flipping those 13 spaces 1800 so that they do not back up into the drive aisle.
Mr. Wische seconded the motion which carried 7-0.
Abandonment
2.
Project Name:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Kepner Drive
John and Tammy Ragno
City of Boynton Beach
Northeast corner of Kepner Drive (a.k.a. S.E. 7th
Street)
Request to abandon the eastern portion of the cul-de-
sac located at the northern terminus of Kepner Drive
(a.k.a. S.E. 7th Street).
Tammy Raano had no questions and agreed with the staff comments.
9
7.A.1
REZONING
BOYNTON COMMONS PCD
.,
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-411
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
THROUGH: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP .;gtJ
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag
Zoning and Site Plan Administrator
DATE: August 9, 1996
SUBJECT: Boynton Commons PCD - File No. REZN 96-001
Introduction
Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, contract purchaser of the subject
property, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan for the Boynton
Commons Planned Commercial Development (PCD). This 23-acre project, approved on
November 21, 1995 for 186,130 square feet ofretail space, is located at the southwest comer of
Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map"). The current land
use, which would remain unaffected by the proposed rezoning, is Local Retail Commercial.
Pursuant to the City's Land Development Regulations (Chapter 2, Section 6.F.13), modifications
to an approved planned commercial development which would result in an increase of ten (10)
percent or more in measurable impacts such as traffic created or water consumed, must be
processed through a new application for zoning to PCD. As the proposed changes would
represent an increase in water demand equivalent to approximately 12%, a rezoning application
has been submitted, including the necessary master plan documents, and is evaluated herein. Had
the impacts of the proposed changes been projected less than 10%, the request would have been
processed as a master plan modification.
Rezonin~/Modifications to Master Plan
The specific changes proposed to the approved master plan are as follows (see Exhibit "B" -
approved master plan and Exhibit "c" - proposed master plan):
1. Relocation and a slight decrease in the size of the retention pond;
2. Omission of the south right-in and right-out driveway on Congress Avenue;
3. Addition of a right-in and right-out only driveway on Old Boynton Road;
4. Changing the total project size from 186,130 square feet to 213,650 square feet;
a total increase of 27,520 square feet which is partially attributed to the increase
in size and separation of Major #6 (identified as "Sports Authority") from the
northern cluster of the three (3) larger attached buildings to an isolated location
where the retention pond is proposed to be moved from;
5. Reduction in the size of the leased restaurant outparcel building from 7,500 square
feet to 5,000 square feet;
6. Increasing the size of the leased bank outparcel building from 5,000 square feet to
8,000 square feet, and conversion to a video rental store ("Video Ave.");
7 . Relocation of the W algreens drive-through feature from the west side to the north
side of the building;
8. Other adjustments in, or redistribution of building square footage, as a result of
J
Page 2
Boynton Commons PCD
REZN 96-001
finalizing lease arrangements and therefore determination of actual tenant sizes
needed (see Exhibit "D" - Applicant's Justification Statement"). Said adjustments
include a) replacement of the unidentified parcel west of "Major #3" with the
20,000 square foot "Major #4" building, reduced in size and moved from the north
side of the site, b) the increase in size of the "Major #5" building to 38,236 square
feet from 20,000 square feet, and c) the creation of one (1), multi-tenant (6-unit)
building to abut the east side of "Major #5"; and
9. Deletion of the clock tower element situated central to the project.
Adjacent Land Use and Zoning
The adjacent land uses and existing zoning in the surrounding area varies and is presented in the
table that follows:
Direction .!lK Zonin.
North Old Boynton Road n/a
Farther north Boynton Festive Center C-3
East Congress Avenue n/a
Farther east Oakwood Square Shopping Ctr. C-3
South L.W.D.D. (L-24) Canal n/a
Farther south developed retail, commercial, utility uses C.3,PU
West Winchester Park Boulevard n/a
Farther west undeveloped property AG
History and Present Zoning
The subject property represented a portio n of the 50 acre "Mall South" site which was annexed,
reclassified and rezoned in June of 1992. The property was reclassified consistent with the
recommended land use shown on the Future Land Use Map; Local Retail Commercial, and zoned
C-3, Community Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element recommended
(and still recommends) that the parcels within Planning Area 7.f (see Consistency with
Comprehensive Plan section below), where possible, be zoned and developed as Planned
Commercial Developments (PCD). On November 21, 1995, the current master plan received
approval in conjunction with a rezoning from C-3 to PCD. Additional information on the original
rezoning to PCD is provided in Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum #95-566.
Analysis - Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
Although the Future Land Use Map would remain unchanged by the proposed rezoning, another
portion of the Comprehensive Plan is applicable to the subject property and is found within
Section VIII. Land Use Problems and Opportunities, of the Future Land Use Element Support
Document. According to Section VIII, the subject property is located within Planning Area 7.f
(which consists of the undeveloped tracts on the east and west sides of Winchester Park
Boulevard), in an area which the City should encourage intensive commercial development". As
indicated in the staff analysis of the original rezoning to Planned Commercial Development, this
requirement for Planning Area 7. f is indicated in the following excerpt from Section VIII (7. t):
".. .the parcels be developed as planned zoning districts, where possible, or meet
the intent of the planned zoning district setbacks and greenbelt standards where not
possible, that the City approve any development of regional impact (including
areawide DRIs) for these parcels,....".
According to the City's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 6.F.l (Intent and
2--
Page 3
Boynton Commons PCD
REZN 96-001
purpose),
"Regulations for the PCD are intended to accomplish a more desirable environment
for commercial development in relation to existing and/or future city
development ....".
Also notable, is that the City's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 6.F.2
(Definition of PCD) defines the PCD according to the following excerpts:
"a. Is land under unified control, planned and developed as a whole in a
single development operation or a programmed series of development
operations for commercial buildings"; and
"b. Provides for a commercial district of efficient and harmonious design so
arranged as to create an attractive project readily integrated with and
having no adverse effect on the adjoining or surrounding areas and
developments" .
Although only a portion of this entire area (known as Planning Area 7.f) which was recommended
for planned development by the Comprehensive Plan, is being master planned at this time, staff
recognized this circumstance when reviewing the original (current) master plan, but also
recognized that the plan's design would allow for possible incremental integration (with respect
to design, circulation etc.) with the remaining undeveloped portions of Area 7.f and particularly,
that portion west of Winchester Park Boulevard. This design attribute was created by aligning
the major, single-tenant buildings on the north and south sides of the site, thereby leaving an open
corridor eastward from Congress Avenue through the site toward the remainder of Area 7.f. This
master plan was construed to be consistent with the above-referenced regulations, and particularly
those portions in bold type above which, in this case, would support the Comprehensive Plan's
recommendation for a unified plan of development within this entire area.
The proposed rezoning includes alterations that lessen these attributes, which consequently,
become inconsistent with recommendations within the Comprehensive Plan and, in part, with the
PCD regulations with respect to facilitating establishment of single or unified development. By
placing a large, single-tenant building in the pathway of the once open corridor of this project,
and in front of the vacant parcel located to the southwest of the site, the ability to integrate the
remainder of Area 7. f with the subject project, is reduced. It also unnecessarily adds another
outparcel to the site; one which exposes the rear of the building to an adjacent right -of-way that
did not have building rears facing it on the approved master plan. By precluding the ultimate
unified design of this entire area, benefits are foregone which include an optimal pedestrian and
vehicular circulation system, integration of small parcels which may otherwise be used marginally
or otherwise left undeveloped, the creation of a more powerful consumer demand or source which
is a significant factor in attracting retail uses, and a unified, more attractive appearance with
respect to building facade and landscaping.
Analysis - Review of Pro.posed Revisions
As previously indicated, the increase of 27 ,520 square feet of retail space would generate in
excess of a ten (10) percent increase in water consumed and sewerage collected. The Utility
Department does not object to this projected increase and indicates it will not negatively impact
utility systems. An increase in impervious area, and the relocation and slight decrease in size of
the retention pond is acceptable to the city engineer, subject to the developer's engineer providing
certification that the drainage system is designed in compliance with all city codes and standards.
With respect to traffic, traffic analysis submitted by the applicant has been forwarded to Palm
Beach County Traffic Division for review for compliance with the Palm Beach County Traffic
Performance Standards, but to date a response has not been received from Palm Beach County.
However, on May 22, 1996, Palm Beach County sent a written response to the Planning and
Zoning Department indicating that an improvement to the intersection of Lawrence Road and
3
Page 4
Boynton Commons PCD
REZN 96-001
Gateway Boulevard is required before more than forty (40) percent of the project traffic is
allowed. The applicant is aware of this condition required by Palm Beach County Traffic
Division. The letter from the county also indicated that the intersection improvement is scheduled
for fiscal year 96/97. Provided this condition is met, the redistribution and increase in square
footage poses no problem.
There are no staff concerns with the deleted Congress A venue driveway, nor the addition of a
right-in and right-out only driveway on Old Boynton Road. A concurrent parking lot variance
has been submitted to reduce the length of the access aisle for the Old Boynton Road entrance
from the required 100 feet to 55 feet.
As for the decreased size of the leased restaurant outparcel building (7,500 square feet to 5,000
square feet), the increase in size of the leased bank outparcel (5,000 square feet to 8,000 square
feet) and the change in this use to a video rental store ("Video Ave. "), there are no staff concerns
with these proposed revisions. However, to remain consistent with the original concept of the
approved master plan, and to remain consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to have
this area developed as a PCD, it is recommended that the leased outparcel building identified as
"Major #5" (a.k.a Sports Authority) remain at the north side of the site in order to maintain an
open corridor between the subject site and the property on the west side of the boulevard. This
open corridor will leave open the potential for the subject project to be integrated with the
eventual design/development of the adjacent vacant property west of Winchester Park Boulevard
and the vacant property located at, and abutting the southwest corner of the project. It will also
minimize views of the rear of the buildings within the center, since the property is bounded on
three sides by major roads and is located in the heart of the city's western commercial area. It
is further recommended that the retention pond be maintained at this location, as proposed within
the currently approved master plan.
Regarding replacing the 45 foot tall clock tower (from the center of the site) with vehicle use area
and parking, staff recommends approval, subject to a lighted fountain being added to the retention
pond. It is further recommended that the lake plantings proposed for the pond be designed to
allow optimum view of the fountain from the public right -of-way and the on-site vehicle use area.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that this rezoning requested by the Boynton Commons Corporation of the
Boynton Commons PCD be approved, subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit "E".
MH:mr
Attachments
xc:Central File
DELL3:BCOMMREZ.REP
1-
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
L..-
._...;
OJ
If}
--~
<!l
<
<)
tv
"NlO'J"OROI
'-'-~~"'-7""2.
-.~,
?
f
R1AA
,
,;
I
1. __
\,y' Nc>r 17't?~ a~"'CJ-f .'':''!-I
{- '"
f I ,.f ..._~~;
. -~'., I
. 10-<;)5
EXHIBIT "B"
EXISTING MASTER PLAN
7
--,
r- . -~ ..--- .. --. ..--;. .:C-1:cr Eelcr Ecu'e'IOIo
I
~ !
I I
li~
t:l;'
f'<..
J
r
..........,
..-..-..-..-. --..-.'
----;mJ--- --'
_ _ - - t- - - --
'_'_0':-0 4- _t _0_0
_-:1.-:1 -'-.-
~....-'"
(
I
I~ & il
....: ..:
I
l( ': 8D
, III
~N
- - - -.
!<
II
". ..... -~
! f.lmli~il [d
I jln:ll'l~t.r
. 'tala a'.
I !in~l!in
. ia~1I11 a
! ~lIqi I
! i. 'I
I llHq
! ill ~
, :~.
1
I
1
I
li~li~i
.ab .1
idUli
\tn"~
l~ill ;
i1;l ,"Slit i
=~ rlj I
p. ,
~ 8i I
a · I
'~
,f ' .-
:~r;!i~
...l- 1'_
\___l~
'L_
I
2i !"
I .... '. '0
IV ~!1: _, . ~. - _I I "r.
L _l~_...... _ . _OId~lC~Road .J ~q- _ :. - -" -I
Ii l!ft I II~IIIII i' 'I~II
lilo I-;il! lilll
DI;I !lilt c;;~ 6
~ i I!! 1I "iiji1&&:' ;.~~ II Iiliil~ill ii~i I
'. .~ ~1ll1~ cot'M
~ . r.;IJ'_lCRl\01'C"lH~1IC.
. f f _.~''''.~ '.OR-:.L
I __:!~ .......-a_
=
CO'C:F'7U"':'-
,...,~eTE=""
""LAN
r.ARc.'elll~1.
_~II'lIHlG
." 11-="""'...-"....
, ..wua~l...
.,..............11'1
-
!
-" --- -----_.__._--_._-_._-~._-_.._..._.. ----.----
'\
~
:-
1&== ~
,C:=
1==
.c::-
1-
.-
EXHIBIT "e"
PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
1
....u-......,~:;~";..~T; .~,~ . t
.. l"!" ~
i
I
I
~~8jiii~o
11~!Mi I,:
ij! ~~~~! :
.r ~8 -8 ~ .
. i~ ~iRia il;
Q2 2H~ i .,
;i I~~i .
8~ ~i ~ I
i ~; 8di Q.:
i Ii ~ ~ B i
i ~ d.
~ Q ~
~
I
~~
R::
"iP
c.
-"
~
o
g'
en
ib
,.
~
,. ,.. ~
".
""
~
'b
i
i
I
J~~IU~ :
~~;~i~.
e~3~~~ilL
IJuo' ~ I fJ
~~~'~r
I~a~~~! .
kzmol ~ .
l!j!! a
~~u;fi ;J
Plcr' ~
~ ~~;~i j ..
~ ~~~~~!
n ~~ .
nr ~
E iil~ t
:= Oa ~
~ z ~
E
~
e
(1.
r
&SlII
~i~
mS
~~g~
@~
-~
~_ en
5
c= ~ iH~
-". n~.
- z go."
~.. -di
i!ll.~
= 5l~:r
nil
1!!~
~ ii!-
~ l.t
r lif
~
~.
I
! . .....-............. ."':::::....
!'I~ "II r-'~!
~....-=-....-=-....-=-....-=-ii~. -~- .-.bj(r~iOi1Roaa. ~ .~_.._u_u_u_u_.L._u_u_
Ii\~ '--.._.._u_.___._.._.._u u..w
· n lii::: I ~ --'._.._U_.._u_u_n_.._
. ,. I !~IUI' . !1I~li~ ;I!;UIU~~~I! I ~lilij!IP~U;IIII;m~~i;~1111 ~ ~
~ ~i il!~ I in!lli lillllllllll HI ! I~il!; ii'~III!~ I ~
~i!~ ~~~~ ~~m~!1 ~ 9 I~ ~I . m ~~ !~~n~iml ~r
II!~ i~~i2 ~iiUt ;~ ~ ~~i~~~~e ~.t
i"1li~ i" m ~z 1JI1i~ !,~~~!!ij _ _ 2; ~~ l! 22 ~_."~~~;!~llB", ~,!,,~ I
10l i - ..dlil~~ I~~~ 'Ii~ lii",~~~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ l:!!~l!~~:l:8'!l1l8 "_01~ a
p:~p?::~;~;.~~~~:::,:c ~~.,
. ,,>- ~ .~, . . \ ~
. l!i
~il~
\D,,~E
~ d !T
~ i,
i'
J<..
~
Ii
o
EXHIBIT "D"
APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION
STATEMENT
II
LAND
DESIGN
SOUTH
land Planning
landscape Architecture
Environmental Consultation
WI
PlANNHm AND
ZONING DEPT.
Jl
407-478-8601. FAX4J7-47MD12' Congress Businesseent",. 12tllN. CongressA"""-"" WI. 215. We>! Palm Beach. Aorida 3340;>
c
July 10. 1996
Mr. Michael Rumpf
City of Boynton Beach
Planning & Zoning Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach. FL 33425
Re: Boynton Commons PCD Rezoning Request - .JustificationlDocumcntation
Dear Mike.
We are presently proposing a rezoning request for the Boynton Commons rCD due to the proposed
increase in square footage. The site is presently zoned PCD. This request is to increase the square
footage for the development from 186.130 sq.ft. to 213.650 sq.ft. This increase is necessary to allow
for more display area within the individual users on the site. Please note. as you look at the plan.
that the number of box users and the outparcels has not changed from the previous submittal. just
the floor area has changed.
The revisions to the master plan from the previous approval. are the addition of an access point onto
Old Boynton Rd., the deletion of an access point onto Congress Ave.. and the shifting around of the
retention area and buildings on the site. The overall master plan concept is still similar to the
previously approved plan.
The proposed rezoning request is primarily for the purpose of adding square footage to the individual
users on the site. This additional square footage has come about through the securing of leases for
the property. More accurate floor plans have been supplied for these individual users. and as a result.
the revised square footage requirements. The number of individual box users. and outparcels has not
changed. but the additional square footage from such building areas as enclosed loading areas.
additional storage areas, and increased display space requirements by these tenants has required this
additional building area.
The proposed rezoning request would increase the previously approved square footage from 186.130
to 2 I 3.650. a difference of 27,520 square feet. The individual uses proposed on the site has not
changed from the last submittal except for the previously approved bank site. This has now been
proposed as a retail establishment. The additional traffic that would be generated by this proposed
building area is 98 daily trips. as outlined in the traffic analysis provided by Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. This additional traffic has been reviewed hy Palm Beach Count,. ane! a response
letter was provided to Ms. Tambri Hayden on this repon. May 22. 1996. The increasc in water and
sewer usage for the proposed square footage is a difference of 12. I EDU's based on the City's
calculation rates.
12-
Mr. Michael Rumpf
July 10, 1996
Page 2
If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please do not hesitate to contact Ollr oflice.
Thank you for your cooperation on this matter.
Sincerely,
LAND DESIGN SOUTH
"':::- -
, ""- ..
.- ..-.._..r__ ~~ -........
~~
Project Manager
JDLllp
cc: Don Stiller
letters/rumpl247.rezlFile 247.10
1:3
EXHIBIT "E"
CONDITIONS OF APPRO V AL
/4
,
EXHIBIT "E"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Boynton Commons PCD
File number: REZN 96-001
Reference:The plans consist of 4 sheets identified as 2nd Review. Rezonina
File # REZN 96-001 with a Julv 19. 1996 Planning and Zoning Department date
stamp marking.
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments: NONE
DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
Comments:
1. Provide proof of unity of title and those
requirements specified under Chap.2, Sec.
6F3,pg.2-53 and Sec.6F8, pg.2-56.
2 . All plans submitted for specific permits shall
meet the City's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include, but are not
limi ted to the following; site lighting, paving,
drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and
traffic control devices. Permits required from
agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any
other permitting agencies shall be included with
future permit requests.
3 . County road entrance sign requires PBC approval
and state road entrance sign requires FDOT
approval.
4. Show the locations of all temporary structures or
permanent structures having a temporary use.
Provide a statement outlining the temporary use
and when they will be removed. Chap.3, Art. IV,
Sec.3R, pg. 3-5.
5 . Provide a master stormwater management plan.
Chap.3, Art. IV, Sec.3T, pg.3-6.
6. Provide copy of approved agreement with LWDD for
use of drainage easements. Chap.5, Art.V, Sec.
1D6, pg.5-5.
7 . Need SFWMD and LWDD acceptance prior to
Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.5A,
pg.6-7.
8. Provide certification by developer's engineer
that drainage plan complies with all city codes
and standards. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and
Chap. 23, Art. rIF , pg.23-8.
/~
Page 2
Rezoning Application
Boynton Commons PCD
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
9. Minimum 15" pipe must be used on storm sewer.
Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.5A, pg . 6 - 7 .
10. Parking lot section must conform to city code.
Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.10F, pg.6-12.
11. Provide details on sanitary sewer easements that
are crossed by drainage swales. Chap.6, Art.V,
Sec.4B2b, pg.6-19.
12. Provide details for pavement, grates, pipes,
catch basins, etc. Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2e, pg.
6-20.
13 . County and/or state permits required for
construction in R.O.W. Chap.6, Art. VI I , Sec.4B,
pg. 6-24.
14. Surety requirements of Chap.7, pg. 7-1 must be
met.
15. Not more than two free standing signs are
allowed. Chap. 21 , Art. IV, Sec.3B, pg. 21-17.
15. Align access paths from sidewalks with H/C
accessible paths including stop bars and signs.
Chap.23, Art.I, Sec. 1B5 , pg. 23-l.
16. Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls,
radii, signs, landscaping, etc. must conform with
city codes and standards. Chap. 23, Art. I I , pg. 23-
6 .
17. Photometrics must be approved for both pedestrian
and parking lot lighting before permit can be
issued. Chap.23, Art.IIA1a, pg. 23-6.
18. Certify that light poles are in compliance with
Standard Building Code and withstand a 110 mph
wind load. Chap.23, Art.IIA1a, pg.23-6.
19. No trees shall be planted so as to interfere with
lighting fixtures. Chap.23, Art.IIAb, pg. 23-7.
20. Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance
with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices II . Chap.23, Art. IIB2 , pg.23-7.
2l. Concrete curb must conform to city standards.
Chap.23, Art.IIE, pg.23-7.
22. Eliminate parking backing directly into major
north/south driveway which serves as a local
street. Chap.23, Art. I I , Sec.12, pg.23-9.
Suggestion: As an alternate to elimination of
parking, eliminate connection to Old Boynton
Road. A second alternative would be to redesign
entire northwest corner of project, possibly
switching retention area with Major #5 and
Retail/Office.
23. Provide location and details of fire lanes.
Chap. 23, Art.IIM, pg.23-9.
/'-
Page 3
Rezoning Application
Boynton Commons PCD
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
24. Provide fire lane at Walgreens. Chap.23, Art.
IIM, pg.23-9.
25. Provide continuation of sidewalks through all
driveways to mark pedestrian paths. Chap.23,
Art. I I , Sec.P, pg. 23-10.
26. Install WIIA-2 pedestrian signs at all crosswalk
locations. MUTCD 3B-18, pg.3B-23.
27. Close off every other aisle opening to the north
and south for a safer circulation pattern. The
new areas should be landscaped and curbed.
28. Add stop signs and stop bars throughout the
development where there is a question of right-
of-way. Examples: At each side of Barnes/Noble
for northbound traffic; in the center of the two
Walgreens drive-thru lanes; at both ends of the
two aisles between video Avenue and Walgreens for
east and westbound traffic.
29. Use city approved road bumps within the major
driveway for speed control.
30. To discourage vehicles parking or standing in the
dire lanes, stripe a six foot wide, cross-hatched
area parallel with the curbed sidewalks
encompassing the words "Fire Lane II (facing
oncoming traffic)
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: NONE
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
31. Provide a tree management plan (statement) for
the large existing Banyan trees.
32. The lake (detention area) shown on the plan shall
have a lake planting plan and management
document.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
33. Modify the site data to identify that nine ( 9)
loading zones are required and provided. A truck
well counts as a loading zone.
34. Specify on the master plan drawings" the
dimension of the loading zones in compliance with
the city standards. Also show and identify on
the master plan the location of the block wall
required to screen the service areas at Video
Ave. and Sports Authority out parcel buildings.
17
Page 4
Rezoning Application
Boynton Commons PCD
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
35. Show and label on the master plan the (10) foot
wide peripheral greenbelt that is required around
the perimeter of the PCD with the exception of
driveway openings and the 269.64 foot property
line located in the southwest portion of the site
that received approval of landscape appeal. The
only improvements allowed within the peripheral
greenbelt area are landscaping and site
wall/buffer wall, where applicable omit the
dumpster enclosure from the greenbelt area along
the south property line.
36. Indicate in the site data found on the master
plan that there are five (5) single tenant
outparcel buildings rather than seven (7) .
37. Indicate in the site data found on the master
plan that there are 836 interior parking spaces
provided and modify the interior required
landscape computations accordingly.
38. Indicate on the master plan a length dimension
for handicapped and regular parking spaces. Also
indicate the width dimension of the handicapped
access aisle that is associated with a
handicapped parking space.
39. To reduce the possibility of someone defacing the
site walls it is recommended that the hedges be
shown on the plans, along the Old Boynton Road
side of the site wall. It is further recommended
that where a site wall is required or proposed
that hedges or vines be planted on the side of
the wall that is closest to the property line.
40. To properly evaluate the impact the proposed Old
Boynton Road driveway will have on the subject
site, adjacent intersection at Congress Avenue
and the existing driveway leading to the site
located on the north side of Old Boynton Road,
show on the master plan the lane configuration
within Old Boynton Road between Congress Avenue
and winchester Park Boulevard. Also show the
location, width and lane configuration of the
existing ingress/egress driveway located on the
north side of Old Boynton Road.
41. Modify the master plan to show the final
determination of the parking lot variance, file
number PKLV 96-003, regarding the distance an on-
site access aisle is located from the right-of-
way line at the west major access aisle on Old
Boynton Road. also indicate with a note on the
master plan the file number (PKLV 96-003) and the
date the City Commission made the final
determination.
/?
Page 5
Memorandum No. 96-404
Boynton Commons - Rezoning
File No. REZN 96-001
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
42. Modify the site data to indicate the site area as
22.885 acres to match the acreage identified on
the survey attached to the submittal rather than
the 23.03 acres referenced on the master plan.
Adjust all site data accordingly.
43. Provide a copy of the city approved and executed
unified control documents.
44. Submit a comparison analysis as required
by letter IIh" on pages 4 and 5 of the
rezoning application.
45. Modify the master plan to reflect the conditions
of approval regarding the county's evaluation of
the traffic impact analysis that was submitted by
the applicant.
46. It is recommended that the leased outparcel
building identified as Sports Authority be
relocated to the north side of the site and that
the space remaining after removing the leased
retail building be replaced with the retention
pond that is presently located in the northwest
corner of the subject site. It is further
recommended that, if a redesign of the site would
result in the omission of the driveway located on
Old Boynton Road that the removal of the driveway
not require an application for a master plan
modification.
47. It is recommended that a lighted foutain be added
to the retention pond and that the lake plantings
proposed for the pond be designed to allow
optimum view of the fountain from the public
right-of-way and the on-site vehicle use area.
48. Submission of a rectified master plan showing
compliance with conditions of approval will be
required to be submitted the Planning and Zoning
Department in triplicate prior to platting and
site plan approval of the project.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
49. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
50. To be determined.
TJH:dim
a:commbcom.wpdjp&d
/9
SOLkr_rr
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-345
TO:
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Carrie Parker, City Manager
Bob Eichorst, Public Works Director
AI Newbold, Building Division
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp.
Mike Haag, Planning & Zoning Department
Jerzy Lewicki, Planning & Zoning Department
William HukillrPevelopment Department
Tambri J. Heyden MfLwAttI.-LtI:k -f^{J'11
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
June 26, 1996
SUBJECT:
Administration Technical Review Committee Meeting - Tuesday, July 2,1996, following the
Applicant Technical Review Commillee Meeting.
On July 2, 1996, a staff-only meeting to discuss the submillal below will be held in the 2nd Floor
Conference Room, Room 201, Mangrove Park School following the standard applicant TRC meeting.
1. Old Business
None
2. New Business
A. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (OTHER THAN SITE PLANS)
Rezoning:
1.
PROJECT:
Boynton Commons Corporation
lOCATION: Southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress
Avenue
AGENT: Joe lelonek, land Design South
OWNER: Bill Ray Winchester & Elsie A. Winchester, Winchester,
Winchester, Zeiher & Schroeder, a Florida partnership
DESCRIPTION: Request to amend the previously approved PCD master plan to
increase the total square footage by 27,520 square feet from
186,130 square feet to 213,650 square feet; add an ingress/egress
onto Old Boynton Road, change the size and configuration of the
main two buildings; create a fourth leased outparcel building, omit
the south ingress/egress on Congress Avenue, substitute the 5,000
square foot leased outparcel bank building for an 8,000 square
foot leased outparcel video store, reduce the size of the leased
outparcel restaurant building from 7,500 to 5,000 square feet,
relocate the drive-thru from the west side of the 15,930 square
foot leased outparcel building to the north side and relocate the
retention area from the southwest corner of the site to the
northwest corner.
NOTE: Written comments and plans are to be returned to the Planning and
Zoning Director no later than 5:00 P.M. on Friday July 12, 1996.
3. Other Business
None
4. Comments by members
5. Adjournment
a:TRCSPfCl.702
...-n / ,
/-,( I fJ"/:Jpy:
c.::- \ .
FbA.. Q=t.,,.J ,:j(; --(Jl!='l
7.A.l
BOYNTON COMMONS
REZONING
)
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 9~-566
"',
Chairman and Membet-s
Planning and Development Board
TO:
SUBJECT:
Tambri J. Heyden
planning and zoning ~ctor
Michael E. Haag vC
zoning and Si~ dr listrator
October 5, 1995
Boynton Commons - File No. REZN 9~-003
Rezoning from C-3 to PCD
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
Introduction
Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, is requesting
that a 23.03 acre parcel (previously 24.74 acres as indicated in the
application) be rezoned from C-3 (Community Commercial) to PCD (Planned
Commercial Development). 'l'he subj ect property is located at the
southwest corner of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road (see Exhibit
"A" - location map). The proposed use of this property is a Planned
Commercial Development (PCD) consisting of 186,130 square feet of gross
leasable floor area. specifically, this project is planned to include
five (5) buildings with uses that may Include a restaurant, office and
othet- retail tenants (see Exhibit "B" rezoning application and
proposed master plan).
Pursuant to the City'S Land Development Regulations (Chapter 2, Section
9.C.2), an analysis of this request need not include application of the
criterIa within section 9 .C. '7 (Which in pat.t, evaluates rezolungs for
compatibility with adjacent land uses and land use patterns, changed or
changing conditions, compatibility with utility systems, and
availability of alternative sites similarly zoned), as the proposed
rezoning does not require an amendment to the future land use map.
AlternatIvely, this analYSIS will emphasis the proposed master plan and
the specifiC recommendation within the comprehensive plan for Planned
CommercIal District zonIng.
Adiacent Land Use and zoJlin.g
The land uses and existing zcming in the surrounding area varies and is
presented in the table that follows:
DIRECTION
Nlll'til
USE
- Old BoynLoll R\)atl
ZONING
ilia
Fal'thl>r nOI th
- Boynton Fest.i\'e Centel' (part.laUy built)
c-]
EHSt
- Congress Avenue
n/a
Fal-the,' east
- OaJ.\.\vood Sql1au~ Shopping Cpll.t-er
c-]
. Soul h
- I..W.D.ll. (L-2/,) Calla I
nla
FarlIle-l- SQulh
- Developed relui 1., commercia] allfl utility uses
C-], I'll
West
- Winchebter Park Boulevan-J
Fal'tht'] \-Jest.
- ull,leveluped pJ ol'ert.y
AC
Historv and Present ZOnlnQ
The subject property represented a portion of the 50 acre "Mall Sout!l"
site which was annexed, reclassified and rezoned In June of 1992.
Although the County's land use classification, CHIB (Commercial High),
accurately represented the intensity of adJacent land uses, the zoning,
until annexed, reflected its ~urrent vacant state, including its use tor
the storage of livestock. Once annexed, the property was reciassifIed
to Local Retail Commercial (pursuant to the comprehensive Plan Future
Land Use Map), and zoned to C-3, Community Commercial. The
I
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-566
Boynton Commons
File No, REZN ~5-0U3
eomprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element recommended (and still
recommends) that the parcels within Planning Area 7.f (see Consistency
with Comprehensive Plan), where possible, be zoned and developed as
Planned Commercial Developments (PCD). Based on this recommendation, the
previous applicant/agent (Kilday & Associates) stated that the subject
property would be rezoned to PCD once a development plan is produced.
The proposed project and potential uses would be permitted by the
existing C-3 zoning district and Local Retail Commercial land use
classification. The proposed uses, in general, include a restaurant,
office and various retail businesses. The following selected building
and site regulations apply to sites within the C-3 zoning district:
Minimum lot frontage
Minimum lot area
Maximum lot coverage
(building)
Minimum front yard
Minimum side yard
(interior lots)
Minimum side yard
(corner lots)
Mlnlmum rear yard
Maximum structure height
75 feet
15,000 feet
40 percent
20 feet
None (see Notes a and b)
15 feet street side (see Note b)
20 feet (see Notes b and c)
45 teet, not to exceed 4 stories
a. Where rear access i:> not available from a publ ic street or
alley, a side yard ot not less than fifteen (15) feet shall be
provided on one side.
b. When abutting a resldential zone, side and/or rear yards shall
be thirty (30) feet minlmum.
c. Where rear yard access is available trom a public street or
alley, rear yard may be decreased by one-half the width of
such street or alley, but in no case shall a rear yard be less
than ten (10) feet.
Off-street parking as set forth in Section 11.H hereinafter.
Proposed Zonina
Accordlng to Chapter 2, Section 6.F.l of the City'S Land Development
Regulations, the purpose of the PCD zoning district "is to prOVide a
zoning classi.fication for commercial developments that will better
satisfy CUi-rent demands for conunerclally zoned lands by encouraging
development which will reflect changes in the concepts and technology of
lal;.d development and i-elate the development of land to the specific
site, to conserve natural amenitles and to allow for the mitigation of
negative impacts which result trom land development".
The proposed Boynton Commons planned Commercial Development consists of
five (5) slngle-story buildings which total 186,130 square feet of gross
leasable floor area (see Exlnbit "B"- proposed master plan). The total
floor area consists ot a 5'),000 square foot multi-tenant building, an
87,500 square foot multl-tenant building, a 1,500 square foot
restaurant, a 5,000 square foot bank, and a 15,930 square foot pharmacy.
The multi-tenant building is currently proposed for retail uses. Access
to the PCD is provided by fOllr (4) ingl.ess/egress driveways; two
driveways onto Winchester Boulevard and two located on Congress Avenue.
All driveways allow right and left turn in and out of the site with the
exception of the south driveway on Congress Avenue which 1S limited to
right in and out. There are Y79 parking spaces proposed on the master
plan, and only nine hundred and thirty one are required for this site
based on the planned 186,130 square feet of gross leasable floor area.
The master plan indicates that the maximum height of the project will be
45 feet, which will include all architectural features as well as the
,.,,2
Page 4
Memorandum No. 95-566
Boynton Commons
File No. REZN 95-003
.the fOllowing excerpt from Section VIII (7.f):
".. .the parcels be developed as planned zoning districts,
where possible, or meet the intent of planning zoning
district setbacks and greenbelt standards where not
possible, that the City approve any Developments of Regional
Impact (including areawide ORIs) for these parcels, and that
development not exceed the capacity of public facilities
which serve these parcels".
Although this recommendation for PCD zoning is construed to apply to
individual parcels within Area 7.h, rather than the entire area as a
whole, the proposed master plan would not preclude the ultimate
unification (with respect to design) with the remaining undeveloped
portion of Area 7.f (that portion west of Winchester Park Boulevard).
Gi ven that the maj ol-i ty of buildings are proposed for the north and
south sides of the site, leaving the east and west ends open for access
and visibility, the two sites can be easily unified or combined to
produce a single commercial pl-oject which, in part, is consistent in
design and appearance, and complimentary with respect to landscaping and
trafflc or pedestrian circulation. It should be noted that this
ol-ientation of the multi-tenant buildings is attributed to speCific
future plans the developer has for this adjacent undeveloped property.
Planned Commercial Development standards
There are three (3) standards listed in the Planned Commercial
Development (PCD) regulations which describe criteria for evaluating the
appropriateness of PCD zoning. The three (3) standards are as follows:
1. Relation to major transportation facilities.
~
~ .
utility extensions, storm water mitigation and roadway improve-
ments.
3. The physical character of the site.
The following is an application of the three standards to the proposed
rezoning:
standard #1 - suggests that PCD's should be located where access to
major roadways or other transportation facilities is affol-ded without
creating or generating an unacceptable level of traffic along streets in
residential areas or districts outside of the subject area. As
previously stated, the project is bordered on the north by Old Boynton
Road, on the west by Winchester Boulevard and on the east by Congress
Avenue. The conclusion from the applicant's traffic consultant is that
no roadway improvements are needed as a result of the proposed project.
Palm Beach County reviewed the traffic report and made a determination
that the project meets Traffic Performance standards (see Exhibit "C" -
Palm Beach county Traffic determination). The proposed PCD does meet
standard #1.
standard #2 - requires that utility services be available to the site
and the property owner construct water and sewer service consistent with
city regUlations. The applicant is proposing to provide on-site
drainage through a network of drainage structures located in grassed
areas with the outfall emptying into a retention area located in the
southwest portion of the project. The applicant is working with the
Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD) to culvert a portion of the adjacent
L.W.D.D (L-24) canal located in the southeast portion of the site.
Based on the information submitted, it appears that the project can meet
both the city's and regulatory agencies requirements for stormwater run-
off, which must be demonstrated in order to comply with staff comments
(the stormwater master plan was submitted after second review comments
were completed; staff comments al.e forthcoming). As indicated in
standard #1, Palm Beach County has determined that the project complies
~I
Page 5
Memorandum No. 95-566
Boynton Commons
File No. REZN 95-003
with the requirements of the County Traffic Performance Standards, and
furthermore, staff has not requested additional off-site improvements.
standard #3 - pertains to the environmental aspects of the site, and it
should be noted that the city's Environmentalist/Forester has accepted
the vegetation assessment report submitted by the applicant. with
respect to soil characteristics, no staff comments have been generated
yet on the soils report which was also submitted after staff conducted
its second/final review of the proposed master plan. However, the soils
engineering report appears to meet the minimum requirements as
established within the Land Development Regulations.
Conclusion/Recommendation
Staff recommends that this request from Boynton Commons Corporation for
Planned Commercial Development zoning be approved subject to the staff
comments in Exhibit "0" - Public works Department Memorandum dated
August 25, 1995, Engineering Division Memorandum NO. 95-314 and No. 95-
310, and Planning and zoning Depal-tment Memorandum NO. 95-571. This
recommendation is based on the following:
1. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive Plan
recommendation for planned Commercial Development zoning as
described for Planning Area 7.f within the Future Land Use support
Document, Section VIII - Land Use Problems and opportunities;
2. The design of the proposed PCD is in compliance with the design
criteria established in the zoning code, subject to staff comments;
3. The proposed master plan meets the criteria represented by the
three standards for zoning property to PCD, subject to compliance
with relevant staff co@uents (see Item #2);
4. The commercial uses allowed in a PCD district are consistent with
uses allowed in the present C-3 zoning; and
5. The proposed zoning, peD, in general, is comparable to the existing
zoning, C-3 (Community Commercial).
MEH:mr
xc: Central File
10(1511; aCOHl~ It!P
~-
J
"
E X H I BIT "A"
(,
It)
II)
-_II
------- C(
\!)
~
<:)
'-J
"IVJOTOROl."c
.1
.~
. .
.~
-
.----...-:-..,.'
--'- ~
-
\
,
,
I
/ l
R1AA
,
,J
I
J. _ Pea _
w 6IC-... l'7'o"\; BSi."'tCJ.fj~!-V.J
,- ~ ...". f - ),
I .,
J~ ""!I'!...~t.
-~"-'\
{:
'-! RF3, ,
~ I:. ':1
". . ,- :/ J'I
.. ~:.~~,
I'
. 10-f}E;
E X H I BIT "B"
i
..
E X H I BIT "e"
-,
l>
:.
Board of County Commissioners
Ken L. Foster, Chairman
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
llir::"'r.::~lWlliOO
o r';~. .._,_..,~-",,~ U
~c.r' I 11995
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPT.
partmenl of Engineering
and Public Works
September I, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director
Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: BOYNTON COMMONS
Dear Ms. Heyden:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the revised traffic impact
study for the project entitled Bovnton Commons, pursuant to the Traffic
Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County Land Development
Code. The proposed project-will consist of 181,130 square feet of general retail
and a 5,000 square foot drive-in bank. You will note that the size of the retail
has been reduced from the 250,000 square feet addressed in the traffic impact
study that you sent to this office. The proposed project will generate 6,684
daily trips. The build-out is 1996.
The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the requirements of
the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any
questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
09-~ fi~
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
cc. William Hukill, P.E., Director
Boynton Beach Department of Development
Joe Pollock, Kimley Horn
File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review
g:\user\dweisber\wp50\tps\boyn51
"An Equal Opportunity. Affirmative Action Employer"
@ p(lfIt64 on locycl~ papal
Box 21229 West ralm Beach, Florid. 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000
1-<(
E X H I BIT liD"
/5-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
.
TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
DATE: August 25, 1995
SUBJECT: Site Plan - Boynton Commons - 2nd Review
Dumpster location must be readdressed however concerns are minimal.
If you have any questions please give me a call at 375-6201.
E chorst
Works Director
XC: Central File
~
:.
,j
,.
'0_._-
~~~@~~w~rnll
UU Al.IG 221995 ~.
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-314._
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
f\.
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
"IIJAf~m ~ukill, P.E.
Cl{I{J'l'ing~neer
TO:
DATE:
August 22, 1995
RE:
BOYNTON COMMONS - 2ND MASTER PLAN REVIEW
We have completed our second review of subject ~aster plan and
have the following comments:
From August 17 comments, the following are satisfied; G,U,V
From August 17 comments, the following may be addressed in
site plan and/or platting reviews; A,B,C,D,F,K,L,M,N,O,P,R,
S,T,W,X
From August 17 comments, the following must be resolved as
condition of master plan approval; E,H,I,J,Q
In addition, a soils investigation report must be submitted as
part of this master plan review.
Note: The applicant has agreed to supply curbs or curb stops at
all parking stalls.
WVH:ck
C:R(.'OMMONS.Ml'l
/7
:,
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
.
, .
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINBERING DIVISION MBMORANDUM NO. 95-310
ID)rn@rn~wrnrnl
~J AUG I 8 /995 ~
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & zoning Director
1~~l~am ~ukill, P.E.
~~- Eng~neer
PLANNING AJ!D \ c:::......
ZONING DfPr ~7
August 17, 1995
BOYNTON COMMONS - MASTER PLAN COMME.TS
We have completed our first review of subject master plan and have
the following comments:
A. Revise documents to reflect all comments.
B. Provide proof of unity of title.
C. Provide release from LWDD accepting pavement, etc. over
easement.
D. County road. entrance sign requires PBC approval & State
road entrance sign requires FDOT approval.
E. The master plan is subject to the provisions of Chapter
2 of the LDR Sec.9C, pg.2-80.
F. Provide Traffic Impact Analysis. Chap.2, Sec. 9C4h(5),
pg.2-85 and Chap.3, Sec.3S, pg.3-5
G. Specify the name, address, telephone number of the
applicant's agent. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3D, pg.3-4
H. Provide a statement that all utilities are available and
will be provided by appropriate ag.encies. Chap. 3,
Art. IV, Sec.3P, pg.3-5
I. Show the locations of all temporary structures or
permanent structures having a temporary use. Provide a
statement outlining the temporary use and when they will
be removed. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3R, pg.3-5
J. Provide a master stormwater management plan. Chap. 3,
Art. IV, Sec.3T, pg.3-6
K. Site plan review and approval required. Chap.4, Sec.2,
pg.4-1
L. County permits required for construction in Congress
R.O.W. Chap.6, ArLVII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24 and Chap.23,
Art.II, Sec.H6, pg.23-9
M. Provide Certification by Developer'S Engineer that
drainage plan complies with all City codes and standards.
Chap.6, ArLIV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF,
pg.23-8
N. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless otherwise approved.
Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.5B, pg.6-8 and Chap.23, Art.IIF,
pg.23-8
O. Locate all drainage easements. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.6B,
pg.6-9
P. Excavation and/or fill permits will be required. Chap.8,
Art.I, Sec.2, pg.8-1
/r
..
. "
~
.-
Engineering Division Memo No. 95-310
Re: Boynton Commons - Master Plan Comments
August 17, 1995
Page 112
Q. Provide dumpster location & details, including drainage.
Chap.7.S, Art.II, Sec.SJ, pg.7.S-l8 and Chap.9, Sec.10C3,
pg.9-4
R. Photometrics must be approved for both pedestrian and
parking lot lighting before building permit can be
issued. Chap.23, Art.II, Ala, pg.23-6
S. Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls, radii,
signs, landscaping, etc. must conform with City codes and
standards. Chap.23, Art.II, pg.23-6
T. Concrete curb must conform to City standards. Chap.23,
Art.IIE, pg.23-7
U. Major driveway must have 100' clear to 1st access aisle
unless variance previously granted. Chap.23, Art.IIHS,
pg.23-9
V. Number of driveways may not exceed two on each street.
Chap.23, Art.II, Sec.H7, pg.23-9
w. parking stall minimum 18' long. Chap.23, Art.II,Il,
pg.23-9
X. Provide fire lanes along front of all buildings.
Chap.23, Art.II, Sec.M, pg.23-9 & 23-10
.
WVH/ck
C:BCOMMONS.MPR
/7
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 9~-571
TO: Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag
Site and zoning Development Administrator
DATE: October 4, 1995
SUBJECT: Boynton Commons - REZN 95-003
3rd Review Comments for Master Plan Approval to construct
a 186,130 square foot retail complex on 23.03 acres of
land in eonn.ction witb . r.~onina tram C-3 to Planned
Commercial Development (peD).
1. On the master plan identify the minimum required landscape
specJ.fications for the followJ.ng; landscape specifications
regal.ding grade of material, installation requirements and
irrigation specifications. Also identify the location,
specie and method of installation of lawn grass. Also
identify specie, spacing or count and size of all landscape
material (note; the size of the landscape material shall be
consistent with the minimum size requirements identified in
the landscape code and at least 50~ of the total number of
trees and hedges provided shall be identified as a native
specie) .
<:. Enhance the open space landscaping. The landscaping shown on
the plan for the most part depicts required vehicle use area
screening with the exception of the trees proposed for the
entrances on Congress Avenue and Winchester Park Boulevard and
some additional trees located in landscape islands in the
parking area. It is recommended that the following additional
landscaping be installed in the greenbelt: .
i. Maintain the required 40 foot on center spacing of the
perimeter greenbelt trees along the existing rights-of-
way. However, change the layout from one tree 40 foot on
center to a grouping of three or four trees that have a
medium or small classification as listed in the FPL
brochure titled "Plant The Right Tree In The Right
Place". The groupJ.ng of trees will create a natural
appearance.
ii. Add to the perimeter greenbelt berms approximately 24 to
30 inches above the adj acent sidewalk located in the
right-of-way. The berm does not have to be continuous,
however, it will give some character to the streetscape.
iii. Instead of installing the continuous hedge in a straight
line meander the hedge within the 10 foot to 15 foot wide
greenbelt.
iv. specify on the plan that sod or mulch will be installed
over all areas not planted with ground cover, trees
and/or shrubs.
3. specify on the master plan the final detel-minatJ.on of the
landscape code appeal file number LAAP 95-006.
4. specify on the master plan the dimension between the west side
of "Major #6" and the west property line.
5. Provide a copy of the City approved unified control documents.
6. Dimension the width of the south two-way driveway located on
Winchester Boulevard (note; minimum width for two-way traffic
is 20 feet).
010
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-571
3rd Review Comments
Boynton Commons
REZN ~~-003
7. Submission of a rectified master plan will be required to be
submitted to the planning and zoning Department in triplicate
prior to platting and site plan approval of the project.
COlllllonlil.(:ol1
vl/