Loading...
AGENDA DOCUMENTS I / CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM D Preliminary Draft D Revised Draft ~ Final Submittal Requested City Commission Date Final Fonn Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Fonn Must be Meeting Dates into City Manager's Office Meeting Dates Turned into City Manager's 0 December 3, 1996 November 25, 1996 0 February 4. 1997 January 29, 1997 0 December 17, 1996 December 11, 1996 0 February 18, 1997 February 12, 1997 0 January 7, 1997 December 30, 1996 0 March 4, 1997 February 29, 1997 0 January 21,1997 January 15. 1997 o March 18, 1997 March 12, 1997 NATURE OF AGENDA ITEM o Administration 0 Consent o Bid 0 Public Hearing [3 Legal 0 Unfinished Business ORDINANCE 2ND READING o Presentation o New Business o Other DESCRIPTION OF AGENDA ITEM (attach additional sheets and supporting documentation if necessary) Rezoning /major master plan modification of the Boynton Commons PCD (see attached). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the attached ordinance be approved on second reading. /_. --/~ ,jL!.( '~)..llA.lc:L Department Hea.r( Signature .J City Manager's Signature D:ISHAREI WPIFORMSIAGENDASICITYCOMlAGENDANW. WPD PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-656 Agenda Memorandum for December 17,1996 City Commission Meeting TO: Dale Sugerman, City Manager Tambri J. Heyden, AICP ?f-d Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DATE: December 11, 1996 SUBJECT: Boynton Commons PCD (REZN 96-001) Rezoning/Modification of Planned Commercial Development (PCD) Please place the above-referenced item on the December 17, 1996 City Commission meeting agenda under Legal - Ordinances, Second Reading. DESCRIPTION You will recall that the City Commission, on August 20, 1996 approved this request from Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, to amend the original PCD master plan to in part, achieve the following: an increase in total square footage from 186,130 to 213,650, the creation of a fourth leased outparcel building using square footage extracted from the main building, the replacement of the 5,000 square foot leased outparcel bank building with an 8,000 square foot leased outparcel building, the reduction in the size of the leased outparcel restaurant building from 7,500 square feet to 5,000 square feet, the relocation of the drugstore drive-through to the north side of the outparcel building, the addition of a driveway onto Old Boynton Road, and the deletion of a driveway on Congress Avenue. As the requested changes constituted a substantial amendment to the approved master plan, the request is processed as a "rezoning", and therefore must ultimately be approved and effectuated through an ordinance. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the attached ordinance be approved on second reading. Attachments xc: Central File MR:BCOMORD2WPD PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-656 Agenda Memorandum for December 17,1996 City Commission Meeting TO: Dale Sugerman, City Manager Tambri J. Heyden, AICP '!Jd Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DATE: December 11, 1996 SUBJECT: Boynton Commons PCD (REZN 96-001) Rezoning/Modification of Planned Commercial Development (PCD) Please place the above-referenced item on the December 17,1996 City Commission meeting agenda under Legal - Ordinances, Second Reading. DESCRIPTION You will recall that the City Commission, on August 20, 1996 approved this request from Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, to amend the original PCD master plan to in part, achieve the following: an increase in total square footage from 186,130 to 213,650, the creation of a fourth leased outparcel building using square footage extracted from the main building, the replacement of the 5,000 square foot leased outparcel bank building with an 8,000 square foot leased outparcel building, the reduction in the size of the leased outparcel restaurant building from 7,500 square feet to 5,000 square feet, the relocation of the drugstore drive-through to the north side of the outparcel building, the addition of a driveway onto Old Boynton Road, and the deletion of a driveway on Congress Avenue. As the requested changes constituted a substantial amendment to the approved master plan, the request is processed as a "rezoning", and therefore must ultimately be approved and effectuated through an ordinance. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the attached ordinance be approved on second reading. Attachments xc: Central File MR:BCOMORD2'wPD PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-420 Agenda Memorandum for August 20, 1996, City Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager Tambri J. Heyden, AICP ~~ Planning and Zoning Director FROM: DATE: August 15, 1996 SUBJECT: Boynton Commons PCD - REZN 96-001 Please place the above-referenced item on the August 20, 1996 City Commission agenda under Public Hearing. DESCRIPTION: Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, contract purchaser, is requesting to amend the original Boynton Commons PCD master plan to increase the total square footage from 186,130 square feet to 213,650 separate square footage from the main building into a fourth, leased outparcel building, replace the 5,000 square foot leased outparcel bank building with an 8,000 square foot leased outparcel video store, reduce the size of the leased outparcel restaurant building from 7,500 square feet to 5,000 square feet, relocate the drugstore drive-thru to the north side of the outparcel building, add a driveway onto Old Boynton Road and delete a driveway on Congress Avenue. Boynton Commons is a planned commercial development to be located at the southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue and is zoned PCD. For further details pertaining to this request, please refer to attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No.96-411. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 7-0 vote, recommended approval subject to all staff comments in Exhibit "E", Conditions of Approval, with modifications to comments IS, 23 and 46, regarding relocation of Sports Authority, signage and relocation of parking and deletion of comments 28 and 30, regarding use of road bumps and closing off certain access aisles. In addition, staff has generated seven new design-related comments, since the Planning and Development Board meeting, which have been generally agreed to by the applicant, to enhance the appearance of the PCD shopping center and recapture the image that was promoted with the original application. These new comments have already been incorporated as comments 50-56 on Exhibit "E". TJH:dim Attachments xc: Central File C:\WPWIN60\WPDOCS\CCAGDREZ.BOY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-411 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board THROUGH: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP .-;gtJ Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and Site Plan Administrator DATE: August 9, 1996 SUBJECT: Boynton Commons PCD - File No. REZN 96-001 Introduction Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, contract purchaser of the subject property, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan for the Boynton Commons Planned Commercial Development (PCD). This 23-acre project, approved on November 21,1995 for 186,130 square feet of retail space, is located at the southwest corner of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map"). The current land use, which would remain unaffected by the proposed rezoning, is Local Retail Commercial. Pursuant to the City's Land Development Regulations (Chapter 2, Section 6.F.13), modifications to an approved planned commercial development which would result in an increase of ten (10) percent or more in measurable impacts such as traffic created or water consumed, must be processed through a new application for zoning to peD. As the proposed changes would represent an increase in water demand equivalent to approximately 12%, a rezoning application has been submitted, including the necessary master plan documents, and is evaluated herein. Had the impacts of the proposed changes been projected less than 10%, the request would have been processed as a master plan modification. RezoninllJModifications to Master Plan The specific changes proposed to the approved master plan are as follows (see Exhibit "B" - approved master plan and Exhibit "C" - proposed master plan): 1. Relocation and a slight decrease in the size of the retention pond; 2. Omission of the south right-in and right-out driveway on Congress Avenue; 3. Addition of a right-in and right-out only driveway on Old Boynton Road; 4. Changing the total project size from 186,130 square feet to 213,650 square feet; a total increase of 27,520 square feet which is partially attributed to the increase in size and separation of Major #6 (identified as "Sports Authority") from the northern cluster of the three (3) larger attached buildings to an isolated location where the retention pond is proposed to be moved from; 5. Reduction in the size of the leased restaurant outparcel building from 7,500 square feet to 5,000 square feet; 6. Increasing the size of the leased bank outparcel building from 5,000 square feet to 8,000 square feet, and conversion to a video rental store ("Video Ave. "); 7 . Relocation of the W algreens drive-through feature from the west side to the north side of the building; 8. Other adjustments in, or redistribution of building square footage, as a result of ) Page 2 Boynton Commons PCD REZN 96-001 fmalizing lease arrangements and therefore determination of actual tenant sizes needed (see Exhibit "D" - Applicant's Justification Statement"). Said adjustments include a) replacement of the unidentified parcel west of "Major #3" with the 20,000 square foot "Major #4" building, reduced in size and moved from the north side of the site, b) the increase in size of the "Major #5" building to 38,236 square feet from 20,000 square feet, and c) the creation of one (1), multi-tenant (6-unit) building to abut the east side of "Major #5"; and 9. Deletion of the clock tower element situated central to the project. Adiacent Land Use and Zonin~ The adjacent land uses and existing zoning in the surrounding area varies and is presented in the table that follows: Direction ~ ~ North Old ll<Jynton Road n/a Farther north Boynton Festive Center C-3 East Congress Avenue n/a Farther east Oakwood Square Shopping Clf. C-3 South L.W.D.D. (L.24) Canal n/a Farther south developed retail, commercial, utility uses C-3,PU West Winchesler Park Boulevard n/a Farther west undeveloped property AG Histo()' and Present Zonin~ The subject property represented a portio n of the 50 acre "Mall South" site which was annexed, reclassified and rezoned in June of 1992. The property was reclassified consistent with the recommended land use shown on the Future Land Use Map; Local Retail Commercial, and zoned C-3, Community Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element recommended (and still recommends) that the parcels within Planning Area 7.f (see Consistency with Comprehensive Plan section below), where possible, be zoned and developed as Planned Commercial Developments (PCD). On November 21, 1995, the current master plan received approval in conjunction with a rezoning from C-3 to PCD. Additional information on the original rezoning to PCD is provided in Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum #95-566. Analysis - Consistenc;y with Comprehensive Plan Although the Future Land Use Map would remain unchanged by the proposed rezoning, another portion of the Comprehensive Plan is applicable to the subject property and is found within Section VIII. Land Use Problems and Opportunities, of the Future Land Use Element Support Document. According to Section VIII, the subject property is located within Planning Area 7.f (which consists of the undeveloped tracts on the east and west sides of Winchester Park Boulevard), in an area which the City should encourage intensive commercial development". As indicated in the staff analysis of the original rezoning to Planned Commercial Development, this requirement for Planning Area 7.f is indicated in the following excerpt from Section VIII (7.t): "...the parcels be developed as planned zoning districts, where possible, or meet the intent of the planned zoning district setbacks and greenbelt standards where not possible, that the City approve any development of regional impact (including areawide DRls) for these parcels,.... ". According to the City's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 6.F.l (Intent and .Y? ~ Page 3 Boynton Commons PCD REZN 96-00 I purpose) , "Regulations for the PCD are intended to accomplish a more desirable environment for commercial development in relation to existing and/or future city development ...." . Also notable, is that the City's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 6.F.2 (Definition of PCD) defines the PCD according to the following excerpts; "a. Is land under unified control, planned and developed as a whole in a single development operation or a programmed series of development operations for commercial buildings"; and "b. Provides for a commercial district of efficient and harmonious design so arranged as to create an attractive project readily integrated with and having no adverse effect on the adjoining or surrounding areas and developments" . Although only a portion of this entire area (known as Planning Area 7. t) which was recommended for planned development by the Comprehensive Plan, is being master planned at this time, staff recognized this circumstance when reviewing the original (current) master plan, but also recognized that the plan's design would allow for possible incremental integration (with respect to design, circulation etc.) with the remaining undeveloped portions of Area 7.f and particularly, that portion west of Winchester Park Boulevard. This design attribute was created by aligning the major, single-tenant buildings on the north and south sides of the site, thereby leaving an open corridor eastward from Congress Avenue through the site toward the remainder of Area 7.f. This master plan was construed to be consistent with the above-referenced regulations, and particularly those portions in bold type above which, in this case, would support the Comprehensive Plan's recommendation for a unified plan of development within this entire area. The proposed rezoning includes alterations that lessen these attributes, which consequently, become inconsistent with recommendations within the Comprehensive Plan and, in part, with the PCD regulations with respect to facilitating establishment of single or unified development. By placing a large, single-tenant building in the pathway of the once open corridor of this project, and in front of the vacant parcel located to the southwest of the site, the ability to integrate the remainder of Area 7.f with the subject project, is reduced. It also unnecessarily adds another outparcel to the site; one which exposes the rear of the building to an adjacent right-of-way that did not have building rears facing it on the approved master plan. By precluding the ultimate unified design of this entire area, benefits are foregone which include an optimal pedestrian and vehicular circulation system, integration of small parcels which may otherwise be used marginally or otherwise left undeveloped, the creation of a more powerful consumer demand or source which is a significant factor in attracting retail uses, and a unified, more attractive appearance with respect to building facade and landscaping. Analysis - Review of Proposed Revisions As previously indicated, the increase of 27,520 square feet of retail space would generate in excess of a ten (10) percent increase in water consumed and sewerage collected. The Utility Department does not object to this projected increase and indicates it will not negatively impact utility systems. An increase in impervious area, and the relocation and slight decrease in size of the retention pond is acceptable to the city engineer, subject to the developer's engineer providing certification that the drainage system is designed in compliance with all city codes and standards. With respect to traffic, traffic analysis submitted by the applicant has been forwarded to Palm Beach County Traffic Division for review for compliance with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards, but to date a response has not been received from Palm Beach County. However, on May 22, 1996, Palm Beach County sent a written response to the Planning and Zoning Department indicating that an improvement to the intersection of Lawrence Road and '3 Page 4 Boynton Commons PCD REZN 96-001 Gateway Boulevard is required before more than forty (40) percent of the project traffic is allowed. The applicant is aware of this condition required by Palm Beach County Traffic Division. The letter from the county also indicated that the intersection improvement is scheduled for fiscal year 96/97. Provided this condition is met, the redistribution and increase in square footage poses no problem. There are no staff concerns with the deleted Congress A venue driveway, nor the addition of a right-in and right-out only driveway on Old Boynton Road. A concurrent parking lot variance has been submitted to reduce the length of the access aisle for the Old Boynton Road entrance from the required 100 feet to 55 feet. As for the decreased size of the leased restaurant outparcel building (7,500 square feet to 5,000 square feet), the increase in size of the leased bank outparcel (5,000 square feet to 8,000 square feet) and the change in this use to a video rental store ("Video Ave. "), there are no staff concerns with these proposed revisions. However, to remain consistent with the original concept of the approved master plan, and to remain consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to have this area developed as a PCD, it is recommended that the leased outparcel building identified as "Major #5" (a.k.a Sports Authority) remain at the north side of the site in order to maintain an open corridor between the subject site and the property on the west side of the boulevard. This open corridor will leave open the potential for the subject project to be integrated with the eventual design/development of the adjacent vacant property west of Winchester Park Boulevard and the vacant property located at, and abutting the southwest corner of the project. It will also minimize views of the rear of the buildings within the center, since the property is bounded on three sides by major roads and is located in the heart of the city's western commercial area. It is further recommended that the retention pond be maintained at this location, as proposed within the currently approved master plan. Regarding replacing the 45 foot tall clock tower (from the center of the site) with vehicle use area and parking, staff recommends approval, subject to a lighted fountain being added to the retention pond. It is further recommended that the lake plantings proposed for the pond be designed to allow optimum view of the fountain from the public right-of-way and the on-site vehicle use area. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that this rezoning requested by the Boynton Commons Corporation of the Boynton Commons PCD be approved, subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit "E". MH:mr Attachments xc:Central File DELL3:BCOMMREZ.REP 1- EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP , , II) 11) --'" \'l ~ I) .... "IVIOTCJI=J .-._~-. - .~ I R1AA , ,-1 I Peo I. . ~ Hrc:z: 17'0,,-, 4~..C'f . 1- 1-: I I ,....!I~, . --.....\ , , I J ; j-r:'PI, ~ ~- -.,0 "" -~,~.. -, r p rr U b "-, ". .. " . , . . 10-95 EXHIBIT "B" EXISTING MASTER PLAN 7 1_ r'.- . ~ ..--- .. -. U -- :;c::cr E=lcr r.CuMro I' I I I I I I I I I I --, - - -." !4 ". ..... I ffmfi~ I J 11~1 fl~ j ilat"1 : rJU~lli ! ;.~IIJi I I illtl II! 1111 I j . ql : I i . . : I~~ 'IJ I I .~h ! I 111r' I I ~' . .q "T 0 lilt rfl Fi!: q. t i . r I I . .rzfJllC.P . '- . j.::: ,--.1........ 'L_ :- ., ._~ c== .~ -x li1 t:t~ f'l.. r f ! I ...."'... ---- ~--- -- - - - - .- - - -- '-.-'r:-' 4- -. _._0 __:1._:1 -'-.- M.... II II': I~ II il II": 'C II iN . I 01 ~I ;1 !c:= 1== I.-=:- r i I ... . in r- .... IU ~!'l: - '. - _I I ~ i '- i _ _CIdSaf.IC~Ro~fil_ _: _ _. -, ~ ..-~_. dr ~ liif _.1-.._:;-;...,.... .._u_.._.._. -.._- .j__u_._...__u_.._.._u_ .-1--,,- g Iii. 0 ~ . filii! I ~ riI 011 1PII'!lllllllnm~ i III I1II Qm~ t II' i~ I I1IIIII1 pill I '11~lii I ~IJI !'tI iI ,. II L ~ i II J ., i I!!I II _.;.lIl II liIIdliIIl l~ Sa ......... - g.!sprrllffi ... II .'FII~.I . ~. I!VAIOIIlaIDl'l"CIl:-'oc ;. ~~L~~ i ::: !l7"~IGII."'1 f.DI;.l '0 - '0 ~ o < III ;:; iG II': n~ ~ 'II.: n~ 11'-: II CO,"CEF'7u":'_ . :-;~eTE=c;c, I "'LAN I ....llCm..AJI. _,..OlMG lie"""........ ., au..~'" "'V.'. 1fI'.'U" - - .. _.- -..------------.--- ---._-_.._.....~ --.-.-------- \ g EXHIBIT "C II PROPOSED MASTER PLAN 1 . i . i ~: i jr ~ . ....-............"'..:::. i . '""'o~~ I _..__._.'_oo-:-"_~~!:-Ji- :11.bkr~[liROaa. i .a_n_.._..~'._h_.L._.._.._ -..-..-..-..-11-00-"-00_00_00_.'-..-..-.. ..-li-- - :. n l;j:;: I 00 OO_OO_h_'._.._OO_n_ . .,. I I;IP!I 1111~II~i ;11111 oeu I all~!II'~llillll!~;ml;~1111 ~ ~ i~! illl 11=1 1191111 ililtl II I Ilii II iil:lll!i ~ I ~~ I~n .ill!1 S & Sa I II m b milflmi i il51~lii ~ililt m ~~~i',,~;;[; ..J! .. I ~~. l!Ii~ '~i;!~ ~w _ e; "II 2! !i!-~...~!f"~ie.~ \;"t;;'" r.: Ii' ;;,;;;/Ili!l I;;:~.. 'G.. jijjij~~U"" .... """ gl!lllr~l!:I~~. "il;lQ. BOYNTON COMMONS DE~~2- PREPARED FOR BOYNTON COMMONS. INC. SOUTH_ aOYNTON IlI!AOH. ~l-OAIDA __/lOnd~ -'f-..'.." ..;....-:'..~,'.. -,. '''~' ~'. ,~ :.'" ;$,~..-, .K ~~ Pi8 "'~e~ii1~"lia 't.. l;l a~~h~ s ~ ~~I";~. ~ U~iiE ~ i I;~nl .. jij::; II EgIS! ?-.:.:.:~.:.:.. . . ti~~l':itil . ~ -I~; ( ~ ~ II . ~' . 1i~1 ....8~ I ~-'i ~~:\ n .............,-;:;.":...#..-:..;- on13eaCh tlO\Jlev.ra- I I I oj Ji1 I ~f._.._n_n_... .. ---.. - ~ .:. ~-- m~11 .-. .-III'! li.1i . ( . vtis, lii:1 . i II III. i .___ !J i ~: ptJ c. ~ ~ f. I:> ~ L!:l rn ~ 1>- "" ~ c. ~ '~i I'll.; ~ ! f! 3: ::> c,. ~ r ~ t.. . I!l ~j!~ ~ 'I;-~- ~d u 'f! /; i ! '"' ~ o .. t"!" - II~jJ!iii I \ U~ibl~1 I ~i iJI,h . .. ~8~o ; i .~ i":~ ~ : . i ~i&l ~ I Q~ ~!l~ i : 3& I~i~. I I ~l f..~ i i:~ nn ~ I i ~ il i i Rid . a Q ~ ~ ,... I~~IW e~~~~o! ~~lt~J~ iill~]F~~ 1t.~&~~ ii~U ~ ~5~"~ ~ aq ~&i~~ ~ Ii',; ~~~~g 8 l'lB: '~.,. n oi! ~ '!i t f.l~ "1 n~ ! ~n ~~~I ' ! i I Efj~ -~ "_ n1 c=~ - l> -:z; ..-- -- H~ IlH Iii hi . -, -I .~ ! Ih );) i" z I! 0.13 ~ 11 ~ EXHIBIT "D" APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT II LAND DESIGN SOUTH Land Planning Landscape Architecture Environmental Consultation WI PLANNING AND ~ ZONING OEPt ollJ7~7HS01' FAX417471l{l)12' CongesBuli"essCenler' 1200N. CongesA"""""SUte 215. WesI ""*" Beod1.AondJ:l3<m July 10. 1996 Mr. Michael Rumpf City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach. FL 33425 Re: Boynton Commons PCD Rezoning Request - .JustificationlDocumcntlltilln Dear Mike. We are presently proposing a rezoning request for the Boynton Commons PCD due to the proposed increase in square footage. The site is presently zoned PCD. This request is to incrcase the square footage for the development from 186.130 sq.ft. to 213.650 sq.ft. This increase is necessary to allow for more display area within the individual users on the site. Please note. as you look at the plan. that the number of box users and the outparcels has not changed from the previous submittal. just the floor area has changed. The revisions to the master plan from the previous approval. are the addition of an access point onto Old Boynton Rd.. the deletion of an access point onto Congress Ave.. and the shilling around of the retention area and buildings on the site. The overall master plan concept is still similar to the previously approved plan. The proposed rezoning request is primarily for the purpose of adding square footage to the individual users on the site. This additional square footage has come about through the securing of leases for the property. More accurate floor plans have been supplied for these individual users. and as a result. the revised square footage requirements. The number of individual box users. and out parcels has not changed. but the additional square footage from such building areas as enclosed loading areas. additional storage areas. and increased display space requirements by these tenants has required this additional building area. The proposed rezoning request would increase the previously approved square footage from 186.130 to 213.650. a difference of 27.520 square feet. The individual uses proposed on the site has not changed from the last submittal except for the previously approved bank site. This has now been proposed as a retail establishment. The additional traffic that would be generated by this proposed building area is 98 daily trips. as outlined in the traffic analysis provided by Kimley-Horn and Associates. Inc. This additional traffic has been reviewed by Palm Beach Count)'. and a response letter was provided to Ms. Tambri Hayden on this report. May 22. 1996. The increase in water and sewer usage for the proposed square footage is a difference of 12.1 EDU's based on the City's calculation rates. /2- Mr. Michael Rumpf July 10. 1996 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding this submittal. please do not hesitate to contact our ol1ice. Thank you for your cooperation on this matter. Sincerely, LAND DESIGN SOUTH ....~ , '---, .-..-.. ....--~. '- ~~ Project Manager JDLllp cc: Don Stiller letters/rumpl247.rezlFile 24710 /3 EXHIBIT "E" CONDITIONS OF APPRO V AL /4 EXHIBIT "E" Conditions of Approval Project name: Boynton Commons PCD File number: REZN 96-001 Reference:The plans consist of 4 sheets identified as 2nd Review. Rezoning File # REZN 96-001 with a July 19. 1996 Plannina and Zonina Denartment date stamn marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: NONE UTILITIES Comments: NONE FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: NONE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Comments: L Provide proof of unity of title and those requirements specified under Chap.2, Sec. 6F3,pg.2-53 and Sec.6F8, pg.2-56. 2. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agencies shall be included with future permit requests. 3 . County road entrance sign requires PBC approval and state road entrance sign requires FDOT approval. 4. Show the locations of all temporary structures or permanent structures having a temporary use. Provide a statement outlining the temporary use and when they will be removed. Chap.3, Art. IV, Sec.3R, pg. 3-5. 5 . Provide a master stormwater management plan. Chap.3, Art. IV, Sec.3T, pg.3-6. 6 . Provide copy of approved agreement with LWDD for use of drainage easements. Chap.5, Art.V, Sec. 1D6, pg.5-S. 7. Need SFWMD and LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7. 8. Provide certification by developer's engineer that drainage plan complies with all city codes and standards. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec. SA, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8. /5' Page 2 Rezoning Application Boynton Commons PCD I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I 9. Minimum 15" pipe must be used on storm sewer. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7. 10. Parking lot section must conform to city code. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.10F, pg.6-12. 1L Provide details on sanitary sewer easements that are crossed by drainage swales. Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2b, pg.6-19. 12. Provide details for pavement, grates, pipes, catch basins, etc. Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2e, pg. 6-20. 13 . County and/or state permits required for construction in R.O.W. Chap.6, Art. VI I, Sec.4B, pg. 6-24. 14. Surety requirements of Chap.7, pg. 7-1 must be met. 15. Not more than two free standing signs are allowed. Chap.21, Art. IV, Sec.3B, pg. 21-17. 16. Align access paths from sidewalks with H/C accessible paths including stop bars and signs. Chap.23, Art.I, Sec.1B5, pg.23-L 17. Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls, radii, signs, landscaping, etc. must conform with city codes and standards. Chap. 23, Art. II, pg.23- 6 . 18. Photometrics must be approved for both pedestrian and parking lot lighting before permit can be issued. Chap. 23, Art.IIA1a, pg. 23-6. 19. Certify that light poles are in compliance with Standard Building Code and withstand a 110 mph wind load. Chap.23, Art.IIA1a, pg.23-6. 20. No trees shall be planted so as to interfere with lighting fixtures. Chap.23, Art. IIAb, pg. 23-7. 2L Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices" . Chap. 23, Art.IIB2, pg.23-7. 22. Concrete curb must conform to city standards. Chap.23, Art.IIE, pg.23-7. 23. Eliminate parking backing directly into major north/south driveway which serves as a local street. Chap. 23, Art. I I , Sec.12, pg.23-9. Suggestion: As an alternate to elimination of parking, eliminate connection to Old Boynton Road. A second alternative would be to redesign entire northwest corner of project, possibly switching retention area with Major #5 and Retail/Office. 24. Provide location and details of fire lanes. Chap. 23 , Art.IIM, pg.23-9. /~ Page 3 Rezoning Application Boynton Commons PCD I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I 25. Provide fire lane at Walgreens. Chap. 23, Art. IIM, pg.23-9. 26. Provide continuation of sidewalks through all driveways to mark pedestrian paths. Chap.23, Art. II , Sec.P, pg. 23-10. 27. Install WIIA-2 pedestrian signs at all crosswalk locations. MUTCD 3B-18, pg. 3B-23. 28. Close off every other aisle opening to the north and south for a safer circulation pattern. The new areas should be landscaped and curbed. 29. Add stop signs and stop bars throughout the development where there is a question of right- of-way. Examples: At each side of Barnes/Noble for northbound traffic; in the center of the two Walgreens drive-thru lanes; at both ends of the two aisles between Video Avenue and Walgreens for east and westbound traffic. 30. Use city approved road bumps within the major driveway for speed control. 31. To discourage vehicles parking or standing in the fire lanes, stripe a six foot wide, cross-hatched area parallel with the curbed sidewalks encompassing the words "Fire Lane" (facing oncoming traffic) . PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 32. Provide a tree management plan (statement) for the large existing Banyan trees. 33. The lake (detention area) shown on the plan shall have a lake planting plan and management document. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 34. Modify the site data to identify that nine (9) loading zones are required and provided. A truck well counts as a loading zone. 35. Specify on the master plan drawings" the dimension of the loading zones in compliance with the city standards. Also show and identify on the master plan the location of the block wall required to screen the service areas at Video Ave. and Sports Authority outparcel buildings. /7 Page 4 Rezoning Application Boynton Commons PCD I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I 36. Show and label on the master plan the (10) foot wide peripheral greenbelt that is required around the perimeter of the PCD with the exception of driveway openings and the 269.64 foot property line located in the southwest portion of the site that received approval of landscape appeal. The only improvements allowed within the peripheral greenbelt area are landscaping and site wall/buffer wall, where applicable omit the dumpster enclosure from the greenbelt area along the south property line. 37. Indicate in the site data found on the master plan that there are five (5) single tenant outparcel buildings rather than seven (7) . 38. Indicate in the site data found on the master plan that there are 836 interior parking spaces provided and modify the interior required landscape computations accordingly. 39. Indicate on the master plan a length dimension for handicapped and regular parking spaces. Also indicate the width dimension of the handicapped access aisle that is associated with a handicapped parking space. 40. To reduce the possibility of someone defacing the site walls it is recommended that the hedges be shown on the plans, along the Old Boynton Road side of the site wall. It is further recommended that where a site wall is required or proposed that hedges or vines be planted on the side of the wall that is closest to the property line. 4l. To properly evaluate the impact the proposed Old Boynton Road driveway will have on the subject site, adjacent intersection at Congress Avenue and the existing driveway leading to the site located on the north side of Old Boynton Road, show on the master plan the lane configuration within Old Boynton Road between Congress Avenue and Winchester Park Boulevard. Also show the location, width and lane configuration of the existing ingress/egress driveway located on the north side of Old Boynton Road. 42. Modify the master plan to show the final determination of the parking lot variance, file number PKLV 96-003, regarding the distance an on- site access aisle is located from the right-of- way line at the west major access aisle on Old Boynton Road. also indicate with a note on the master plan the file number (PKLV 96-003) and the date the City Commission made the final determination. 18 MEETING MINUTES PLANNING 80 DEVELOPt..u:NT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA C. OTHER Parklna Lot Variance 1. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: D~-) _ crb -ODI f-SI- J AUGUST 13, 1996 Boynton Commons PCD Joe Lelonek Land Design South Bill Ray Winchester and Elsie A. Winchester Southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue Request for a variance from the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 23 - Parking Lots, Article II, Section H.5 - Clearance at major driveways, to reduce the required distance of the interior access aisle to the driveway on Old Boynton Road from 100 feet to 55 feet on the west side of the two-way driveway. Chairman Dube questioned whether there was a need to discuss the variance since the applicant is eliminating the driveway. Joe Lelonek advised that he is following staffs direction by seeking approval. He has no objection to any of the conditions. When the applicant submits the site plan, the driveway will be eliminated. Ms. Heyden advised that the master plan which was approved by the board this evening requires this variance. Motion Mr. Aguila moved to approve the request for a variance from the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 23 - Parking Lots. Article II, Section H.5 - Clearance at major driveways, to reduce the required distance of the interior access aisle to the driveway on Old Boynton Road from 100 feet to 55 feet on the west side of the two-way driveway subject to staff comments and subject to the earlier condition of flipping those 13 spaces 1800 so that they do not back up into the drive aisle. Mr. Wische seconded the motion which carried 7-0. Abandonment 2. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Kepner Drive John and Tammy Ragno City of Boynton Beach Northeast corner of Kepner Drive (a.k.a. S.E. 7th Street) Request to abandon the eastern portion of the cul-de- sac located at the northern terminus of Kepner Drive (a.k.a. S.E. 7th Street). Tammy Raano had no questions and agreed with the staff comments. 9 7.A.1 REZONING BOYNTON COMMONS PCD ., PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-411 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board THROUGH: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP .;gtJ Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and Site Plan Administrator DATE: August 9, 1996 SUBJECT: Boynton Commons PCD - File No. REZN 96-001 Introduction Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, contract purchaser of the subject property, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan for the Boynton Commons Planned Commercial Development (PCD). This 23-acre project, approved on November 21, 1995 for 186,130 square feet ofretail space, is located at the southwest comer of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map"). The current land use, which would remain unaffected by the proposed rezoning, is Local Retail Commercial. Pursuant to the City's Land Development Regulations (Chapter 2, Section 6.F.13), modifications to an approved planned commercial development which would result in an increase of ten (10) percent or more in measurable impacts such as traffic created or water consumed, must be processed through a new application for zoning to PCD. As the proposed changes would represent an increase in water demand equivalent to approximately 12%, a rezoning application has been submitted, including the necessary master plan documents, and is evaluated herein. Had the impacts of the proposed changes been projected less than 10%, the request would have been processed as a master plan modification. Rezonin~/Modifications to Master Plan The specific changes proposed to the approved master plan are as follows (see Exhibit "B" - approved master plan and Exhibit "c" - proposed master plan): 1. Relocation and a slight decrease in the size of the retention pond; 2. Omission of the south right-in and right-out driveway on Congress Avenue; 3. Addition of a right-in and right-out only driveway on Old Boynton Road; 4. Changing the total project size from 186,130 square feet to 213,650 square feet; a total increase of 27,520 square feet which is partially attributed to the increase in size and separation of Major #6 (identified as "Sports Authority") from the northern cluster of the three (3) larger attached buildings to an isolated location where the retention pond is proposed to be moved from; 5. Reduction in the size of the leased restaurant outparcel building from 7,500 square feet to 5,000 square feet; 6. Increasing the size of the leased bank outparcel building from 5,000 square feet to 8,000 square feet, and conversion to a video rental store ("Video Ave."); 7 . Relocation of the W algreens drive-through feature from the west side to the north side of the building; 8. Other adjustments in, or redistribution of building square footage, as a result of J Page 2 Boynton Commons PCD REZN 96-001 finalizing lease arrangements and therefore determination of actual tenant sizes needed (see Exhibit "D" - Applicant's Justification Statement"). Said adjustments include a) replacement of the unidentified parcel west of "Major #3" with the 20,000 square foot "Major #4" building, reduced in size and moved from the north side of the site, b) the increase in size of the "Major #5" building to 38,236 square feet from 20,000 square feet, and c) the creation of one (1), multi-tenant (6-unit) building to abut the east side of "Major #5"; and 9. Deletion of the clock tower element situated central to the project. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning The adjacent land uses and existing zoning in the surrounding area varies and is presented in the table that follows: Direction .!lK Zonin. North Old Boynton Road n/a Farther north Boynton Festive Center C-3 East Congress Avenue n/a Farther east Oakwood Square Shopping Ctr. C-3 South L.W.D.D. (L-24) Canal n/a Farther south developed retail, commercial, utility uses C.3,PU West Winchester Park Boulevard n/a Farther west undeveloped property AG History and Present Zoning The subject property represented a portio n of the 50 acre "Mall South" site which was annexed, reclassified and rezoned in June of 1992. The property was reclassified consistent with the recommended land use shown on the Future Land Use Map; Local Retail Commercial, and zoned C-3, Community Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element recommended (and still recommends) that the parcels within Planning Area 7.f (see Consistency with Comprehensive Plan section below), where possible, be zoned and developed as Planned Commercial Developments (PCD). On November 21, 1995, the current master plan received approval in conjunction with a rezoning from C-3 to PCD. Additional information on the original rezoning to PCD is provided in Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum #95-566. Analysis - Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Although the Future Land Use Map would remain unchanged by the proposed rezoning, another portion of the Comprehensive Plan is applicable to the subject property and is found within Section VIII. Land Use Problems and Opportunities, of the Future Land Use Element Support Document. According to Section VIII, the subject property is located within Planning Area 7.f (which consists of the undeveloped tracts on the east and west sides of Winchester Park Boulevard), in an area which the City should encourage intensive commercial development". As indicated in the staff analysis of the original rezoning to Planned Commercial Development, this requirement for Planning Area 7. f is indicated in the following excerpt from Section VIII (7. t): ".. .the parcels be developed as planned zoning districts, where possible, or meet the intent of the planned zoning district setbacks and greenbelt standards where not possible, that the City approve any development of regional impact (including areawide DRIs) for these parcels,....". According to the City's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 6.F.l (Intent and 2-- Page 3 Boynton Commons PCD REZN 96-001 purpose), "Regulations for the PCD are intended to accomplish a more desirable environment for commercial development in relation to existing and/or future city development ....". Also notable, is that the City's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 6.F.2 (Definition of PCD) defines the PCD according to the following excerpts: "a. Is land under unified control, planned and developed as a whole in a single development operation or a programmed series of development operations for commercial buildings"; and "b. Provides for a commercial district of efficient and harmonious design so arranged as to create an attractive project readily integrated with and having no adverse effect on the adjoining or surrounding areas and developments" . Although only a portion of this entire area (known as Planning Area 7.f) which was recommended for planned development by the Comprehensive Plan, is being master planned at this time, staff recognized this circumstance when reviewing the original (current) master plan, but also recognized that the plan's design would allow for possible incremental integration (with respect to design, circulation etc.) with the remaining undeveloped portions of Area 7.f and particularly, that portion west of Winchester Park Boulevard. This design attribute was created by aligning the major, single-tenant buildings on the north and south sides of the site, thereby leaving an open corridor eastward from Congress Avenue through the site toward the remainder of Area 7.f. This master plan was construed to be consistent with the above-referenced regulations, and particularly those portions in bold type above which, in this case, would support the Comprehensive Plan's recommendation for a unified plan of development within this entire area. The proposed rezoning includes alterations that lessen these attributes, which consequently, become inconsistent with recommendations within the Comprehensive Plan and, in part, with the PCD regulations with respect to facilitating establishment of single or unified development. By placing a large, single-tenant building in the pathway of the once open corridor of this project, and in front of the vacant parcel located to the southwest of the site, the ability to integrate the remainder of Area 7. f with the subject project, is reduced. It also unnecessarily adds another outparcel to the site; one which exposes the rear of the building to an adjacent right -of-way that did not have building rears facing it on the approved master plan. By precluding the ultimate unified design of this entire area, benefits are foregone which include an optimal pedestrian and vehicular circulation system, integration of small parcels which may otherwise be used marginally or otherwise left undeveloped, the creation of a more powerful consumer demand or source which is a significant factor in attracting retail uses, and a unified, more attractive appearance with respect to building facade and landscaping. Analysis - Review of Pro.posed Revisions As previously indicated, the increase of 27 ,520 square feet of retail space would generate in excess of a ten (10) percent increase in water consumed and sewerage collected. The Utility Department does not object to this projected increase and indicates it will not negatively impact utility systems. An increase in impervious area, and the relocation and slight decrease in size of the retention pond is acceptable to the city engineer, subject to the developer's engineer providing certification that the drainage system is designed in compliance with all city codes and standards. With respect to traffic, traffic analysis submitted by the applicant has been forwarded to Palm Beach County Traffic Division for review for compliance with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards, but to date a response has not been received from Palm Beach County. However, on May 22, 1996, Palm Beach County sent a written response to the Planning and Zoning Department indicating that an improvement to the intersection of Lawrence Road and 3 Page 4 Boynton Commons PCD REZN 96-001 Gateway Boulevard is required before more than forty (40) percent of the project traffic is allowed. The applicant is aware of this condition required by Palm Beach County Traffic Division. The letter from the county also indicated that the intersection improvement is scheduled for fiscal year 96/97. Provided this condition is met, the redistribution and increase in square footage poses no problem. There are no staff concerns with the deleted Congress A venue driveway, nor the addition of a right-in and right-out only driveway on Old Boynton Road. A concurrent parking lot variance has been submitted to reduce the length of the access aisle for the Old Boynton Road entrance from the required 100 feet to 55 feet. As for the decreased size of the leased restaurant outparcel building (7,500 square feet to 5,000 square feet), the increase in size of the leased bank outparcel (5,000 square feet to 8,000 square feet) and the change in this use to a video rental store ("Video Ave. "), there are no staff concerns with these proposed revisions. However, to remain consistent with the original concept of the approved master plan, and to remain consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to have this area developed as a PCD, it is recommended that the leased outparcel building identified as "Major #5" (a.k.a Sports Authority) remain at the north side of the site in order to maintain an open corridor between the subject site and the property on the west side of the boulevard. This open corridor will leave open the potential for the subject project to be integrated with the eventual design/development of the adjacent vacant property west of Winchester Park Boulevard and the vacant property located at, and abutting the southwest corner of the project. It will also minimize views of the rear of the buildings within the center, since the property is bounded on three sides by major roads and is located in the heart of the city's western commercial area. It is further recommended that the retention pond be maintained at this location, as proposed within the currently approved master plan. Regarding replacing the 45 foot tall clock tower (from the center of the site) with vehicle use area and parking, staff recommends approval, subject to a lighted fountain being added to the retention pond. It is further recommended that the lake plantings proposed for the pond be designed to allow optimum view of the fountain from the public right -of-way and the on-site vehicle use area. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that this rezoning requested by the Boynton Commons Corporation of the Boynton Commons PCD be approved, subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit "E". MH:mr Attachments xc:Central File DELL3:BCOMMREZ.REP 1- EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP L..- ._...; OJ If} --~ <!l < <) tv "NlO'J"OROI '-'-~~"'-7""2. -.~, ? f R1AA , ,; I 1. __ \,y' Nc>r 17't?~ a~"'CJ-f .'':''!-I {- '" f I ,.f ..._~~; . -~'., I . 10-<;)5 EXHIBIT "B" EXISTING MASTER PLAN 7 --, r- . -~ ..--- .. --. ..--;. .:C-1:cr Eelcr Ecu'e'IOIo I ~ ! I I li~ t:l;' f'<.. J r .........., ..-..-..-..-. --..-.' ----;mJ--- --' _ _ - - t- - - -- '_'_0':-0 4- _t _0_0 _-:1.-:1 -'-.- ~....-'" ( I I~ & il ....: ..: I l( ': 8D , III ~N - - - -. !< II ". ..... -~ ! f.lmli~il [d I jln:ll'l~t.r . 'tala a'. I !in~l!in . ia~1I11 a ! ~lIqi I ! i. 'I I llHq ! ill ~ , :~. 1 I 1 I li~li~i .ab .1 idUli \tn"~ l~ill ; i1;l ,"Slit i =~ rlj I p. , ~ 8i I a · I '~ ,f ' .- :~r;!i~ ...l- 1'_ \___l~ 'L_ I 2i !" I .... '. '0 IV ~!1: _, . ~. - _I I "r. L _l~_...... _ . _OId~lC~Road .J ~q- _ :. - -" -I Ii l!ft I II~IIIII i' 'I~II lilo I-;il! lilll DI;I !lilt c;;~ 6 ~ i I!! 1I "iiji1&&:' ;.~~ II Iiliil~ill ii~i I '. .~ ~1ll1~ cot'M ~ . r.;IJ'_lCRl\01'C"lH~1IC. . f f _.~''''.~ '.OR-:.L I __:!~ .......-a_ = CO'C:F'7U"':'- ,...,~eTE="" ""LAN r.ARc.'elll~1. _~II'lIHlG ." 11-="""'...-".... , ..wua~l... .,..............11'1 - ! -" --- -----_.__._--_._-_._-~._-_.._..._.. ----.---- '\ ~ :- 1&== ~ ,C:= 1== .c::- 1- .- EXHIBIT "e" PROPOSED MASTER PLAN 1 ....u-......,~:;~";..~T; .~,~ . t .. l"!" ~ i I I ~~8jiii~o 11~!Mi I,: ij! ~~~~! : .r ~8 -8 ~ . . i~ ~iRia il; Q2 2H~ i ., ;i I~~i . 8~ ~i ~ I i ~; 8di Q.: i Ii ~ ~ B i i ~ d. ~ Q ~ ~ I ~~ R:: "iP c. -" ~ o g' en ib ,. ~ ,. ,.. ~ ". "" ~ 'b i i I J~~IU~ : ~~;~i~. e~3~~~ilL IJuo' ~ I fJ ~~~'~r I~a~~~! . kzmol ~ . l!j!! a ~~u;fi ;J Plcr' ~ ~ ~~;~i j .. ~ ~~~~~! n ~~ . nr ~ E iil~ t := Oa ~ ~ z ~ E ~ e (1. r &SlII ~i~ mS ~~g~ @~ -~ ~_ en 5 c= ~ iH~ -". n~. - z go." ~.. -di i!ll.~ = 5l~:r nil 1!!~ ~ ii!- ~ l.t r lif ~ ~. I ! . .....-............. ."':::::.... !'I~ "II r-'~! ~....-=-....-=-....-=-....-=-ii~. -~- .-.bj(r~iOi1Roaa. ~ .~_.._u_u_u_u_.L._u_u_ Ii\~ '--.._.._u_.___._.._.._u u..w · n lii::: I ~ --'._.._U_.._u_u_n_.._ . ,. I !~IUI' . !1I~li~ ;I!;UIU~~~I! I ~lilij!IP~U;IIII;m~~i;~1111 ~ ~ ~ ~i il!~ I in!lli lillllllllll HI ! I~il!; ii'~III!~ I ~ ~i!~ ~~~~ ~~m~!1 ~ 9 I~ ~I . m ~~ !~~n~iml ~r II!~ i~~i2 ~iiUt ;~ ~ ~~i~~~~e ~.t i"1li~ i" m ~z 1JI1i~ !,~~~!!ij _ _ 2; ~~ l! 22 ~_."~~~;!~llB", ~,!,,~ I 10l i - ..dlil~~ I~~~ 'Ii~ lii",~~~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ l:!!~l!~~:l:8'!l1l8 "_01~ a p:~p?::~;~;.~~~~:::,:c ~~., . ,,>- ~ .~, . . \ ~ . l!i ~il~ \D,,~E ~ d !T ~ i, i' J<.. ~ Ii o EXHIBIT "D" APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT II LAND DESIGN SOUTH land Planning landscape Architecture Environmental Consultation WI PlANNHm AND ZONING DEPT. Jl 407-478-8601. FAX4J7-47MD12' Congress Businesseent",. 12tllN. CongressA"""-"" WI. 215. We>! Palm Beach. Aorida 3340;> c July 10. 1996 Mr. Michael Rumpf City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach. FL 33425 Re: Boynton Commons PCD Rezoning Request - .JustificationlDocumcntation Dear Mike. We are presently proposing a rezoning request for the Boynton Commons rCD due to the proposed increase in square footage. The site is presently zoned PCD. This request is to increase the square footage for the development from 186.130 sq.ft. to 213.650 sq.ft. This increase is necessary to allow for more display area within the individual users on the site. Please note. as you look at the plan. that the number of box users and the outparcels has not changed from the previous submittal. just the floor area has changed. The revisions to the master plan from the previous approval. are the addition of an access point onto Old Boynton Rd., the deletion of an access point onto Congress Ave.. and the shifting around of the retention area and buildings on the site. The overall master plan concept is still similar to the previously approved plan. The proposed rezoning request is primarily for the purpose of adding square footage to the individual users on the site. This additional square footage has come about through the securing of leases for the property. More accurate floor plans have been supplied for these individual users. and as a result. the revised square footage requirements. The number of individual box users. and outparcels has not changed. but the additional square footage from such building areas as enclosed loading areas. additional storage areas, and increased display space requirements by these tenants has required this additional building area. The proposed rezoning request would increase the previously approved square footage from 186.130 to 2 I 3.650. a difference of 27,520 square feet. The individual uses proposed on the site has not changed from the last submittal except for the previously approved bank site. This has now been proposed as a retail establishment. The additional traffic that would be generated by this proposed building area is 98 daily trips. as outlined in the traffic analysis provided by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. This additional traffic has been reviewed hy Palm Beach Count,. ane! a response letter was provided to Ms. Tambri Hayden on this repon. May 22. 1996. The increasc in water and sewer usage for the proposed square footage is a difference of 12. I EDU's based on the City's calculation rates. 12- Mr. Michael Rumpf July 10, 1996 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please do not hesitate to contact Ollr oflice. Thank you for your cooperation on this matter. Sincerely, LAND DESIGN SOUTH "':::- - , ""- .. .- ..-.._..r__ ~~ -........ ~~ Project Manager JDLllp cc: Don Stiller letters/rumpl247.rezlFile 247.10 1:3 EXHIBIT "E" CONDITIONS OF APPRO V AL /4 , EXHIBIT "E" Conditions of Approval Project name: Boynton Commons PCD File number: REZN 96-001 Reference:The plans consist of 4 sheets identified as 2nd Review. Rezonina File # REZN 96-001 with a Julv 19. 1996 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I PUBLIC WORKS Comments: NONE UTILITIES Comments: NONE FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: NONE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Comments: 1. Provide proof of unity of title and those requirements specified under Chap.2, Sec. 6F3,pg.2-53 and Sec.6F8, pg.2-56. 2 . All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limi ted to the following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agencies shall be included with future permit requests. 3 . County road entrance sign requires PBC approval and state road entrance sign requires FDOT approval. 4. Show the locations of all temporary structures or permanent structures having a temporary use. Provide a statement outlining the temporary use and when they will be removed. Chap.3, Art. IV, Sec.3R, pg. 3-5. 5 . Provide a master stormwater management plan. Chap.3, Art. IV, Sec.3T, pg.3-6. 6. Provide copy of approved agreement with LWDD for use of drainage easements. Chap.5, Art.V, Sec. 1D6, pg.5-5. 7 . Need SFWMD and LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7. 8. Provide certification by developer's engineer that drainage plan complies with all city codes and standards. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap. 23, Art. rIF , pg.23-8. /~ Page 2 Rezoning Application Boynton Commons PCD DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 9. Minimum 15" pipe must be used on storm sewer. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.5A, pg . 6 - 7 . 10. Parking lot section must conform to city code. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.10F, pg.6-12. 11. Provide details on sanitary sewer easements that are crossed by drainage swales. Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2b, pg.6-19. 12. Provide details for pavement, grates, pipes, catch basins, etc. Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4B2e, pg. 6-20. 13 . County and/or state permits required for construction in R.O.W. Chap.6, Art. VI I , Sec.4B, pg. 6-24. 14. Surety requirements of Chap.7, pg. 7-1 must be met. 15. Not more than two free standing signs are allowed. Chap. 21 , Art. IV, Sec.3B, pg. 21-17. 15. Align access paths from sidewalks with H/C accessible paths including stop bars and signs. Chap.23, Art.I, Sec. 1B5 , pg. 23-l. 16. Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls, radii, signs, landscaping, etc. must conform with city codes and standards. Chap. 23, Art. I I , pg. 23- 6 . 17. Photometrics must be approved for both pedestrian and parking lot lighting before permit can be issued. Chap.23, Art.IIA1a, pg. 23-6. 18. Certify that light poles are in compliance with Standard Building Code and withstand a 110 mph wind load. Chap.23, Art.IIA1a, pg.23-6. 19. No trees shall be planted so as to interfere with lighting fixtures. Chap.23, Art.IIAb, pg. 23-7. 20. Provide stop signs and stop bars in accordance with the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices II . Chap.23, Art. IIB2 , pg.23-7. 2l. Concrete curb must conform to city standards. Chap.23, Art.IIE, pg.23-7. 22. Eliminate parking backing directly into major north/south driveway which serves as a local street. Chap.23, Art. I I , Sec.12, pg.23-9. Suggestion: As an alternate to elimination of parking, eliminate connection to Old Boynton Road. A second alternative would be to redesign entire northwest corner of project, possibly switching retention area with Major #5 and Retail/Office. 23. Provide location and details of fire lanes. Chap. 23, Art.IIM, pg.23-9. /'- Page 3 Rezoning Application Boynton Commons PCD I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I 24. Provide fire lane at Walgreens. Chap.23, Art. IIM, pg.23-9. 25. Provide continuation of sidewalks through all driveways to mark pedestrian paths. Chap.23, Art. I I , Sec.P, pg. 23-10. 26. Install WIIA-2 pedestrian signs at all crosswalk locations. MUTCD 3B-18, pg.3B-23. 27. Close off every other aisle opening to the north and south for a safer circulation pattern. The new areas should be landscaped and curbed. 28. Add stop signs and stop bars throughout the development where there is a question of right- of-way. Examples: At each side of Barnes/Noble for northbound traffic; in the center of the two Walgreens drive-thru lanes; at both ends of the two aisles between video Avenue and Walgreens for east and westbound traffic. 29. Use city approved road bumps within the major driveway for speed control. 30. To discourage vehicles parking or standing in the dire lanes, stripe a six foot wide, cross-hatched area parallel with the curbed sidewalks encompassing the words "Fire Lane II (facing oncoming traffic) PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 31. Provide a tree management plan (statement) for the large existing Banyan trees. 32. The lake (detention area) shown on the plan shall have a lake planting plan and management document. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 33. Modify the site data to identify that nine ( 9) loading zones are required and provided. A truck well counts as a loading zone. 34. Specify on the master plan drawings" the dimension of the loading zones in compliance with the city standards. Also show and identify on the master plan the location of the block wall required to screen the service areas at Video Ave. and Sports Authority out parcel buildings. 17 Page 4 Rezoning Application Boynton Commons PCD DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 35. Show and label on the master plan the (10) foot wide peripheral greenbelt that is required around the perimeter of the PCD with the exception of driveway openings and the 269.64 foot property line located in the southwest portion of the site that received approval of landscape appeal. The only improvements allowed within the peripheral greenbelt area are landscaping and site wall/buffer wall, where applicable omit the dumpster enclosure from the greenbelt area along the south property line. 36. Indicate in the site data found on the master plan that there are five (5) single tenant outparcel buildings rather than seven (7) . 37. Indicate in the site data found on the master plan that there are 836 interior parking spaces provided and modify the interior required landscape computations accordingly. 38. Indicate on the master plan a length dimension for handicapped and regular parking spaces. Also indicate the width dimension of the handicapped access aisle that is associated with a handicapped parking space. 39. To reduce the possibility of someone defacing the site walls it is recommended that the hedges be shown on the plans, along the Old Boynton Road side of the site wall. It is further recommended that where a site wall is required or proposed that hedges or vines be planted on the side of the wall that is closest to the property line. 40. To properly evaluate the impact the proposed Old Boynton Road driveway will have on the subject site, adjacent intersection at Congress Avenue and the existing driveway leading to the site located on the north side of Old Boynton Road, show on the master plan the lane configuration within Old Boynton Road between Congress Avenue and winchester Park Boulevard. Also show the location, width and lane configuration of the existing ingress/egress driveway located on the north side of Old Boynton Road. 41. Modify the master plan to show the final determination of the parking lot variance, file number PKLV 96-003, regarding the distance an on- site access aisle is located from the right-of- way line at the west major access aisle on Old Boynton Road. also indicate with a note on the master plan the file number (PKLV 96-003) and the date the City Commission made the final determination. /? Page 5 Memorandum No. 96-404 Boynton Commons - Rezoning File No. REZN 96-001 I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I 42. Modify the site data to indicate the site area as 22.885 acres to match the acreage identified on the survey attached to the submittal rather than the 23.03 acres referenced on the master plan. Adjust all site data accordingly. 43. Provide a copy of the city approved and executed unified control documents. 44. Submit a comparison analysis as required by letter IIh" on pages 4 and 5 of the rezoning application. 45. Modify the master plan to reflect the conditions of approval regarding the county's evaluation of the traffic impact analysis that was submitted by the applicant. 46. It is recommended that the leased outparcel building identified as Sports Authority be relocated to the north side of the site and that the space remaining after removing the leased retail building be replaced with the retention pond that is presently located in the northwest corner of the subject site. It is further recommended that, if a redesign of the site would result in the omission of the driveway located on Old Boynton Road that the removal of the driveway not require an application for a master plan modification. 47. It is recommended that a lighted foutain be added to the retention pond and that the lake plantings proposed for the pond be designed to allow optimum view of the fountain from the public right-of-way and the on-site vehicle use area. 48. Submission of a rectified master plan showing compliance with conditions of approval will be required to be submitted the Planning and Zoning Department in triplicate prior to platting and site plan approval of the project. ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 49. To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 50. To be determined. TJH:dim a:commbcom.wpdjp&d /9 SOLkr_rr PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-345 TO: TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS Carrie Parker, City Manager Bob Eichorst, Public Works Director AI Newbold, Building Division William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp. Mike Haag, Planning & Zoning Department Jerzy Lewicki, Planning & Zoning Department William HukillrPevelopment Department Tambri J. Heyden MfLwAttI.-LtI:k -f^{J'11 Planning & Zoning Director FROM: DATE: June 26, 1996 SUBJECT: Administration Technical Review Committee Meeting - Tuesday, July 2,1996, following the Applicant Technical Review Commillee Meeting. On July 2, 1996, a staff-only meeting to discuss the submillal below will be held in the 2nd Floor Conference Room, Room 201, Mangrove Park School following the standard applicant TRC meeting. 1. Old Business None 2. New Business A. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (OTHER THAN SITE PLANS) Rezoning: 1. PROJECT: Boynton Commons Corporation lOCATION: Southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue AGENT: Joe lelonek, land Design South OWNER: Bill Ray Winchester & Elsie A. Winchester, Winchester, Winchester, Zeiher & Schroeder, a Florida partnership DESCRIPTION: Request to amend the previously approved PCD master plan to increase the total square footage by 27,520 square feet from 186,130 square feet to 213,650 square feet; add an ingress/egress onto Old Boynton Road, change the size and configuration of the main two buildings; create a fourth leased outparcel building, omit the south ingress/egress on Congress Avenue, substitute the 5,000 square foot leased outparcel bank building for an 8,000 square foot leased outparcel video store, reduce the size of the leased outparcel restaurant building from 7,500 to 5,000 square feet, relocate the drive-thru from the west side of the 15,930 square foot leased outparcel building to the north side and relocate the retention area from the southwest corner of the site to the northwest corner. NOTE: Written comments and plans are to be returned to the Planning and Zoning Director no later than 5:00 P.M. on Friday July 12, 1996. 3. Other Business None 4. Comments by members 5. Adjournment a:TRCSPfCl.702 ...-n / , /-,( I fJ"/:Jpy: c.::- \ . FbA.. Q=t.,,.J ,:j(; --(Jl!='l 7.A.l BOYNTON COMMONS REZONING ) PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 9~-566 "', Chairman and Membet-s Planning and Development Board TO: SUBJECT: Tambri J. Heyden planning and zoning ~ctor Michael E. Haag vC zoning and Si~ dr listrator October 5, 1995 Boynton Commons - File No. REZN 9~-003 Rezoning from C-3 to PCD THROUGH: FROM: DATE: Introduction Land Design South, agent for Boynton Commons Corporation, is requesting that a 23.03 acre parcel (previously 24.74 acres as indicated in the application) be rezoned from C-3 (Community Commercial) to PCD (Planned Commercial Development). 'l'he subj ect property is located at the southwest corner of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road (see Exhibit "A" - location map). The proposed use of this property is a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) consisting of 186,130 square feet of gross leasable floor area. specifically, this project is planned to include five (5) buildings with uses that may Include a restaurant, office and othet- retail tenants (see Exhibit "B" rezoning application and proposed master plan). Pursuant to the City'S Land Development Regulations (Chapter 2, Section 9.C.2), an analysis of this request need not include application of the criterIa within section 9 .C. '7 (Which in pat.t, evaluates rezolungs for compatibility with adjacent land uses and land use patterns, changed or changing conditions, compatibility with utility systems, and availability of alternative sites similarly zoned), as the proposed rezoning does not require an amendment to the future land use map. AlternatIvely, this analYSIS will emphasis the proposed master plan and the specifiC recommendation within the comprehensive plan for Planned CommercIal District zonIng. Adiacent Land Use and zoJlin.g The land uses and existing zcming in the surrounding area varies and is presented in the table that follows: DIRECTION Nlll'til USE - Old BoynLoll R\)atl ZONING ilia Fal'thl>r nOI th - Boynton Fest.i\'e Centel' (part.laUy built) c-] EHSt - Congress Avenue n/a Fal-the,' east - OaJ.\.\vood Sql1au~ Shopping Cpll.t-er c-] . Soul h - I..W.D.ll. (L-2/,) Calla I nla FarlIle-l- SQulh - Developed relui 1., commercia] allfl utility uses C-], I'll West - Winchebter Park Boulevan-J Fal'tht'] \-Jest. - ull,leveluped pJ ol'ert.y AC Historv and Present ZOnlnQ The subject property represented a portion of the 50 acre "Mall Sout!l" site which was annexed, reclassified and rezoned In June of 1992. Although the County's land use classification, CHIB (Commercial High), accurately represented the intensity of adJacent land uses, the zoning, until annexed, reflected its ~urrent vacant state, including its use tor the storage of livestock. Once annexed, the property was reciassifIed to Local Retail Commercial (pursuant to the comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map), and zoned to C-3, Community Commercial. The I Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-566 Boynton Commons File No, REZN ~5-0U3 eomprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element recommended (and still recommends) that the parcels within Planning Area 7.f (see Consistency with Comprehensive Plan), where possible, be zoned and developed as Planned Commercial Developments (PCD). Based on this recommendation, the previous applicant/agent (Kilday & Associates) stated that the subject property would be rezoned to PCD once a development plan is produced. The proposed project and potential uses would be permitted by the existing C-3 zoning district and Local Retail Commercial land use classification. The proposed uses, in general, include a restaurant, office and various retail businesses. The following selected building and site regulations apply to sites within the C-3 zoning district: Minimum lot frontage Minimum lot area Maximum lot coverage (building) Minimum front yard Minimum side yard (interior lots) Minimum side yard (corner lots) Mlnlmum rear yard Maximum structure height 75 feet 15,000 feet 40 percent 20 feet None (see Notes a and b) 15 feet street side (see Note b) 20 feet (see Notes b and c) 45 teet, not to exceed 4 stories a. Where rear access i:> not available from a publ ic street or alley, a side yard ot not less than fifteen (15) feet shall be provided on one side. b. When abutting a resldential zone, side and/or rear yards shall be thirty (30) feet minlmum. c. Where rear yard access is available trom a public street or alley, rear yard may be decreased by one-half the width of such street or alley, but in no case shall a rear yard be less than ten (10) feet. Off-street parking as set forth in Section 11.H hereinafter. Proposed Zonina Accordlng to Chapter 2, Section 6.F.l of the City'S Land Development Regulations, the purpose of the PCD zoning district "is to prOVide a zoning classi.fication for commercial developments that will better satisfy CUi-rent demands for conunerclally zoned lands by encouraging development which will reflect changes in the concepts and technology of lal;.d development and i-elate the development of land to the specific site, to conserve natural amenitles and to allow for the mitigation of negative impacts which result trom land development". The proposed Boynton Commons planned Commercial Development consists of five (5) slngle-story buildings which total 186,130 square feet of gross leasable floor area (see Exlnbit "B"- proposed master plan). The total floor area consists ot a 5'),000 square foot multi-tenant building, an 87,500 square foot multl-tenant building, a 1,500 square foot restaurant, a 5,000 square foot bank, and a 15,930 square foot pharmacy. The multi-tenant building is currently proposed for retail uses. Access to the PCD is provided by fOllr (4) ingl.ess/egress driveways; two driveways onto Winchester Boulevard and two located on Congress Avenue. All driveways allow right and left turn in and out of the site with the exception of the south driveway on Congress Avenue which 1S limited to right in and out. There are Y79 parking spaces proposed on the master plan, and only nine hundred and thirty one are required for this site based on the planned 186,130 square feet of gross leasable floor area. The master plan indicates that the maximum height of the project will be 45 feet, which will include all architectural features as well as the ,.,,2 Page 4 Memorandum No. 95-566 Boynton Commons File No. REZN 95-003 .the fOllowing excerpt from Section VIII (7.f): ".. .the parcels be developed as planned zoning districts, where possible, or meet the intent of planning zoning district setbacks and greenbelt standards where not possible, that the City approve any Developments of Regional Impact (including areawide ORIs) for these parcels, and that development not exceed the capacity of public facilities which serve these parcels". Although this recommendation for PCD zoning is construed to apply to individual parcels within Area 7.h, rather than the entire area as a whole, the proposed master plan would not preclude the ultimate unification (with respect to design) with the remaining undeveloped portion of Area 7.f (that portion west of Winchester Park Boulevard). Gi ven that the maj ol-i ty of buildings are proposed for the north and south sides of the site, leaving the east and west ends open for access and visibility, the two sites can be easily unified or combined to produce a single commercial pl-oject which, in part, is consistent in design and appearance, and complimentary with respect to landscaping and trafflc or pedestrian circulation. It should be noted that this ol-ientation of the multi-tenant buildings is attributed to speCific future plans the developer has for this adjacent undeveloped property. Planned Commercial Development standards There are three (3) standards listed in the Planned Commercial Development (PCD) regulations which describe criteria for evaluating the appropriateness of PCD zoning. The three (3) standards are as follows: 1. Relation to major transportation facilities. ~ ~ . utility extensions, storm water mitigation and roadway improve- ments. 3. The physical character of the site. The following is an application of the three standards to the proposed rezoning: standard #1 - suggests that PCD's should be located where access to major roadways or other transportation facilities is affol-ded without creating or generating an unacceptable level of traffic along streets in residential areas or districts outside of the subject area. As previously stated, the project is bordered on the north by Old Boynton Road, on the west by Winchester Boulevard and on the east by Congress Avenue. The conclusion from the applicant's traffic consultant is that no roadway improvements are needed as a result of the proposed project. Palm Beach County reviewed the traffic report and made a determination that the project meets Traffic Performance standards (see Exhibit "C" - Palm Beach county Traffic determination). The proposed PCD does meet standard #1. standard #2 - requires that utility services be available to the site and the property owner construct water and sewer service consistent with city regUlations. The applicant is proposing to provide on-site drainage through a network of drainage structures located in grassed areas with the outfall emptying into a retention area located in the southwest portion of the project. The applicant is working with the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD) to culvert a portion of the adjacent L.W.D.D (L-24) canal located in the southeast portion of the site. Based on the information submitted, it appears that the project can meet both the city's and regulatory agencies requirements for stormwater run- off, which must be demonstrated in order to comply with staff comments (the stormwater master plan was submitted after second review comments were completed; staff comments al.e forthcoming). As indicated in standard #1, Palm Beach County has determined that the project complies ~I Page 5 Memorandum No. 95-566 Boynton Commons File No. REZN 95-003 with the requirements of the County Traffic Performance Standards, and furthermore, staff has not requested additional off-site improvements. standard #3 - pertains to the environmental aspects of the site, and it should be noted that the city's Environmentalist/Forester has accepted the vegetation assessment report submitted by the applicant. with respect to soil characteristics, no staff comments have been generated yet on the soils report which was also submitted after staff conducted its second/final review of the proposed master plan. However, the soils engineering report appears to meet the minimum requirements as established within the Land Development Regulations. Conclusion/Recommendation Staff recommends that this request from Boynton Commons Corporation for Planned Commercial Development zoning be approved subject to the staff comments in Exhibit "0" - Public works Department Memorandum dated August 25, 1995, Engineering Division Memorandum NO. 95-314 and No. 95- 310, and Planning and zoning Depal-tment Memorandum NO. 95-571. This recommendation is based on the following: 1. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive Plan recommendation for planned Commercial Development zoning as described for Planning Area 7.f within the Future Land Use support Document, Section VIII - Land Use Problems and opportunities; 2. The design of the proposed PCD is in compliance with the design criteria established in the zoning code, subject to staff comments; 3. The proposed master plan meets the criteria represented by the three standards for zoning property to PCD, subject to compliance with relevant staff co@uents (see Item #2); 4. The commercial uses allowed in a PCD district are consistent with uses allowed in the present C-3 zoning; and 5. The proposed zoning, peD, in general, is comparable to the existing zoning, C-3 (Community Commercial). MEH:mr xc: Central File 10(1511; aCOHl~ It!P ~- J " E X H I BIT "A" (, It) II) -_II ------- C( \!) ~ <:) '-J "IVJOTOROl."c .1 .~ . . .~ - .----...-:-..,.' --'- ~ - \ , , I / l R1AA , ,J I J. _ Pea _ w 6IC-... l'7'o"\; BSi."'tCJ.fj~!-V.J ,- ~ ...". f - ), I ., J~ ""!I'!...~t. -~"-'\ {: '-! RF3, , ~ I:. ':1 ". . ,- :/ J'I .. ~:.~~, I' . 10-f}E; E X H I BIT "B" i .. E X H I BIT "e" -, l> :. Board of County Commissioners Ken L. Foster, Chairman Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Maude Ford Lee llir::"'r.::~lWlliOO o r';~. .._,_..,~-",,~ U ~c.r' I 11995 County Administrator Robert Weisman PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT. partmenl of Engineering and Public Works September I, 1995 Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE: BOYNTON COMMONS Dear Ms. Heyden: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the revised traffic impact study for the project entitled Bovnton Commons, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The proposed project-will consist of 181,130 square feet of general retail and a 5,000 square foot drive-in bank. You will note that the size of the retail has been reduced from the 250,000 square feet addressed in the traffic impact study that you sent to this office. The proposed project will generate 6,684 daily trips. The build-out is 1996. The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the requirements of the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER 09-~ fi~ Dan Weisberg, P.E. Senior Registered Civil Engineer cc. William Hukill, P.E., Director Boynton Beach Department of Development Joe Pollock, Kimley Horn File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review g:\user\dweisber\wp50\tps\boyn51 "An Equal Opportunity. Affirmative Action Employer" @ p(lfIt64 on locycl~ papal Box 21229 West ralm Beach, Florid. 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000 1-<( E X H I BIT liD" /5- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM . TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director DATE: August 25, 1995 SUBJECT: Site Plan - Boynton Commons - 2nd Review Dumpster location must be readdressed however concerns are minimal. If you have any questions please give me a call at 375-6201. E chorst Works Director XC: Central File ~ :. ,j ,. '0_._- ~~~@~~w~rnll UU Al.IG 221995 ~. DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-314._ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. f\. FROM: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director "IIJAf~m ~ukill, P.E. Cl{I{J'l'ing~neer TO: DATE: August 22, 1995 RE: BOYNTON COMMONS - 2ND MASTER PLAN REVIEW We have completed our second review of subject ~aster plan and have the following comments: From August 17 comments, the following are satisfied; G,U,V From August 17 comments, the following may be addressed in site plan and/or platting reviews; A,B,C,D,F,K,L,M,N,O,P,R, S,T,W,X From August 17 comments, the following must be resolved as condition of master plan approval; E,H,I,J,Q In addition, a soils investigation report must be submitted as part of this master plan review. Note: The applicant has agreed to supply curbs or curb stops at all parking stalls. WVH:ck C:R(.'OMMONS.Ml'l /7 :, TO: FROM: DATE: RE: . , . DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINBERING DIVISION MBMORANDUM NO. 95-310 ID)rn@rn~wrnrnl ~J AUG I 8 /995 ~ Tambri J. Heyden Planning & zoning Director 1~~l~am ~ukill, P.E. ~~- Eng~neer PLANNING AJ!D \ c:::...... ZONING DfPr ~7 August 17, 1995 BOYNTON COMMONS - MASTER PLAN COMME.TS We have completed our first review of subject master plan and have the following comments: A. Revise documents to reflect all comments. B. Provide proof of unity of title. C. Provide release from LWDD accepting pavement, etc. over easement. D. County road. entrance sign requires PBC approval & State road entrance sign requires FDOT approval. E. The master plan is subject to the provisions of Chapter 2 of the LDR Sec.9C, pg.2-80. F. Provide Traffic Impact Analysis. Chap.2, Sec. 9C4h(5), pg.2-85 and Chap.3, Sec.3S, pg.3-5 G. Specify the name, address, telephone number of the applicant's agent. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3D, pg.3-4 H. Provide a statement that all utilities are available and will be provided by appropriate ag.encies. Chap. 3, Art. IV, Sec.3P, pg.3-5 I. Show the locations of all temporary structures or permanent structures having a temporary use. Provide a statement outlining the temporary use and when they will be removed. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec.3R, pg.3-5 J. Provide a master stormwater management plan. Chap. 3, Art. IV, Sec.3T, pg.3-6 K. Site plan review and approval required. Chap.4, Sec.2, pg.4-1 L. County permits required for construction in Congress R.O.W. Chap.6, ArLVII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24 and Chap.23, Art.II, Sec.H6, pg.23-9 M. Provide Certification by Developer'S Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes and standards. Chap.6, ArLIV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8 N. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless otherwise approved. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.5B, pg.6-8 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8 O. Locate all drainage easements. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.6B, pg.6-9 P. Excavation and/or fill permits will be required. Chap.8, Art.I, Sec.2, pg.8-1 /r .. . " ~ .- Engineering Division Memo No. 95-310 Re: Boynton Commons - Master Plan Comments August 17, 1995 Page 112 Q. Provide dumpster location & details, including drainage. Chap.7.S, Art.II, Sec.SJ, pg.7.S-l8 and Chap.9, Sec.10C3, pg.9-4 R. Photometrics must be approved for both pedestrian and parking lot lighting before building permit can be issued. Chap.23, Art.II, Ala, pg.23-6 S. Parking lot dimensions, striping, aisles, stalls, radii, signs, landscaping, etc. must conform with City codes and standards. Chap.23, Art.II, pg.23-6 T. Concrete curb must conform to City standards. Chap.23, Art.IIE, pg.23-7 U. Major driveway must have 100' clear to 1st access aisle unless variance previously granted. Chap.23, Art.IIHS, pg.23-9 V. Number of driveways may not exceed two on each street. Chap.23, Art.II, Sec.H7, pg.23-9 w. parking stall minimum 18' long. Chap.23, Art.II,Il, pg.23-9 X. Provide fire lanes along front of all buildings. Chap.23, Art.II, Sec.M, pg.23-9 & 23-10 . WVH/ck C:BCOMMONS.MPR /7 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 9~-571 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Site and zoning Development Administrator DATE: October 4, 1995 SUBJECT: Boynton Commons - REZN 95-003 3rd Review Comments for Master Plan Approval to construct a 186,130 square foot retail complex on 23.03 acres of land in eonn.ction witb . r.~onina tram C-3 to Planned Commercial Development (peD). 1. On the master plan identify the minimum required landscape specJ.fications for the followJ.ng; landscape specifications regal.ding grade of material, installation requirements and irrigation specifications. Also identify the location, specie and method of installation of lawn grass. Also identify specie, spacing or count and size of all landscape material (note; the size of the landscape material shall be consistent with the minimum size requirements identified in the landscape code and at least 50~ of the total number of trees and hedges provided shall be identified as a native specie) . <:. Enhance the open space landscaping. The landscaping shown on the plan for the most part depicts required vehicle use area screening with the exception of the trees proposed for the entrances on Congress Avenue and Winchester Park Boulevard and some additional trees located in landscape islands in the parking area. It is recommended that the following additional landscaping be installed in the greenbelt: . i. Maintain the required 40 foot on center spacing of the perimeter greenbelt trees along the existing rights-of- way. However, change the layout from one tree 40 foot on center to a grouping of three or four trees that have a medium or small classification as listed in the FPL brochure titled "Plant The Right Tree In The Right Place". The groupJ.ng of trees will create a natural appearance. ii. Add to the perimeter greenbelt berms approximately 24 to 30 inches above the adj acent sidewalk located in the right-of-way. The berm does not have to be continuous, however, it will give some character to the streetscape. iii. Instead of installing the continuous hedge in a straight line meander the hedge within the 10 foot to 15 foot wide greenbelt. iv. specify on the plan that sod or mulch will be installed over all areas not planted with ground cover, trees and/or shrubs. 3. specify on the master plan the final detel-minatJ.on of the landscape code appeal file number LAAP 95-006. 4. specify on the master plan the dimension between the west side of "Major #6" and the west property line. 5. Provide a copy of the City approved unified control documents. 6. Dimension the width of the south two-way driveway located on Winchester Boulevard (note; minimum width for two-way traffic is 20 feet). 010 Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-571 3rd Review Comments Boynton Commons REZN ~~-003 7. Submission of a rectified master plan will be required to be submitted to the planning and zoning Department in triplicate prior to platting and site plan approval of the project. COlllllonlil.(:ol1 vl/