Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd, p, 0, Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS PLEASE NOTE THAT THE EFFICIENCY BY WHICH YOU RECEIVE YOUR PERMIT DEPENDS ON YOUR RESPONSE TO THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOU CAREFULLY READ AND CORRECTLY RESPOND TO ALL ASPECTS OF THIS DOCUMENT. COMMENTS: For permit application number: Project Name or Address: REVIEWED BY: 00-168 Auto Care Center of America Departmentand/orDivision: Planning & Zoning Name of Reviewer: Jose Alfaro Trade: Phone # (561) 742-6260 ex!, Fax # (561)742-6259 Date Started Review: 02/08/001- Type of Review: Which Review: COMMENT DISTRIBUTION: 1ZI1st o 2nd D3rd o 4th 0 Other _. Person identified on the application ,to receive comments: Name Phone # Fax # (area eode:561) (area eode:561) ex!,O Date(s) reviewer called: Person who received the call THE FOLLOWING AREA SHALL BE FILLED-IN IN THE PRESENCE OF THE PLANS ANALYST AND/OR PERMIT CLERK: COMMENTS/PLANS PICKED UP: Comment(s) reed. by print name and date: OR Plans/Comments reed, by print name and date: Page 2 of2 I" 2nd 3,d 4"' Plan Review Comments for Permit Application # 98- Your permit application and supporting documentation do not comply with the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Prior to receiving a permit to construct or install the requested improvements the plans and documents shall be amended to show compliance with the below listed comments. Prior to making the changes to the plans and/or documents please read the attached Submittal of Corrected Plans form, This form contains important information relative to amending documents and submitting corrected plans and/or documents, Questions regarding the comments may be directed to the reviewer named above, If a conference is necessary, please schedule an appointment with the reviewer. Please note that additional comments may be generated following staff review of the amended plans. Timely approval of your project is dependent upon your prompt and correct response to the information provided in this document. Find attached, a form titled SUbmittal of Corrected Plans, this document shall be properly completed and stapled to the file copy oUhe corrected plans when submitting them tothe Plans Analyst. 1- Bv Sian Proaramapproved bv City CommissiononOctober6,.1998. the sian located on Woolbriaht Road should be placed on the westemmostcorner of the property: proposed location on the middle areaofthef17' alonaWoolbriaht Road is incorrect. Please modify accordinalv makina ,sure that 1 Oreet setback distance from any property line is complied with, 2- Same Skin Proaram approved sian on Woolbriaht Road asa 14'6" x 8'0", Please modify dimensions accordinolv, 3- Please submit colors for whole siqn, includinC}individualtenants, 4- Proposed sian depicts two tenants and an emotv space in between, Please indicate tenant for that space, 5- Please indicate tvpeof landsGaoinqand.irriaation method if part of this permit. Jose 2 I I I I II ,I I J..i ,,"'" ........ct 9' . I I 1, "".I1-.~ .....,., A'''''''' J.. ",.,.,n :n~~ "',. Ol.,., \JlO"l\ .,., &.61 J..i ..:IOd, ....Vl'd91 U>>d. """~d 9~ -) -) -) ~ "10H1 ...""'" -,IS L'BIB" _.,. d04S '010Q ........ _~ u:lCld, ""t) W......d'l _0 "",- '30 or \JlO .,.,.E .. J..i -:i5 G'~IO'L UOl101I01.UI l? OJ015 0"1 (- -) ........-....~ -. .....,1 ! -; , . / __J /:>._! ., ''-~'/ '-'" / " >..,"1 _._ _--/ I '---..:....._i '.J 'PIOUOO'W I o,owv bln"x;! J..i ...d ...d ",..,. ~dO" JlJ .."", ""~d , J.. , -- ~ \~ pOO(:l yblJqloo M FILE COpy ~ >\ - ~ ~ '- ij It) ~ '::;\~ ,~ ~-----~- () o :::> .n , <';) II> II> ;t> I, ~ ::l C I m >>: >>, ,,- , -, .,. I ~~~ ~~::3 " ~ ,,:?O 7<:; ~\ "N'-G Ql '" =- - \jI ()' ~><:z: ~ \.fI- , # ,,_'3:) ,~ 0~ <Q)~~ I ~~ '" ~ '0 \)\ -~ ~ ~ ~ \.1'1 Cos; = ~" 0 ~ " \)\ "",'3 " C)"'" ~ " :z:~'0 '" () ~~C; " z: \j ~ ~ " \j ~ :"C) '" '" N-\ :z: \)\ " = 0 rn ~ ......t; ...._~.... Vl ; : : :' ~ 01: : : : .t;~('1iIIIIII r~ ~-: ;1;..-7W..l "'~"..~')ij..l.'~ IJ>~' ' '- .,.""Q.u;L.i.;:::;.r~,' ..,,~...~) JJ ilI!i ~~.... l~Lil~:~, ".,w,:::l~, ' : l~-~,~: 8 >~ ~ ~ '~ntft:.i;- ......;: ~i ~..~ "h..~::~r'''' ~.~. 01 Q:""'''-;-L:'-J ,..,.,~,~,..I:.d~ :--J Ol. .tr P1 ......~..gL OJ ~~ '" ' ......~.. :g. 581:;! ::::J o.ii.Q) 0> 0""" C :r~::1. ,la, <11_0 <0<11 o-2~ ~~~ 0> "-l'l :~3i ." <110 (l)::J"'!2. 9.<00' :::tI(i;:J <11 cr'" ~~ 0>:> C'>, [,l,2f~;? .,,!-C a.: s- iii ~ .[ f( C;::~<<-'" ;~QO~ la--'~~ ~ r~ -, ::l' '" g ~ 11:0> "-la g~g=;:~ 'U 0 ::s crillJ 0 0 ::J'" DJ ~CIl!:O~ g ~ 6'~cQ"O ~ ? i=I:3 CD m a. iir )> "'0 5!fS;: 0 !CD z 22 s.'O () --I ~fl m:n ~~ om ~ affi~ ;;;!f O:n ...CD zm i.i' () 0 ~aoO _~s:z ~ ~ 'll)> ~R6F ~o ;Z .......:,.. .. ...~... ....;. , , ' , ' , ' , .. ....~. .......i........i. , ' ' o 0> ~ ......; & ~ C'-- ~ ~ '- 1 ( \'> T ~ )> "- "- la '" !'! o <11 '" <5' :> <11 "- <11 1l c '" <' <1l -< , o -'-- ~ # \j\ ~ '3:) ~ Co g 1 ~~ ~ ,- "'~ ------- ~ II c::;:: :J> :z: /.... //~~ p~ ~ N \j\ 8 "3 ~, " () :z: " ~ ~ 1-1 f', ,~IJj (- .' , I~ l n' , ....I --:Jf., n ---- t> ':11' ~-t1 ( II> u' I I 1 f' .. " 13 : IJ Co \ o ~" \~ ~~ s:::~ :z: _ '3 :z: \.I'I~ ~N :z: " -\ ....., - r- ,...., C"":) c:::::>> -a -< L ----- ---- ------- ----=======-~=-------- ----- --====~=====- , ~ "' "...........- T ~ ~~~~ CJ~>~ ?'--\", \.1'1-;> '0":3:'" "',,-() \.fI~~~ V; v' N '" '" il I ------..J ~' /' " , , ;)fEnNG MINUTES ,lEGULAR CITY COMMISSION , I BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 6, 1998 Commissioner Denahan moved to approve Consent Agenda Item 0,3. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz seconded the motion that carried unanimously, 0.4. Auto C3re Centers 0' America (SOutheast comer 0' Woolbright Road and Congress Avenue) - Annette Stauffer, Sign Crall - Request approval 'or sign program (TABLED TO ~O/06) Commissioner Titcomb requested information from the applicant since this item has been controversial. He pointed out that the trend has been to use monument signs along Congress Avenue and questioned the reason why this sign is a pole-type sign, Motion Mayor Pro Tem Tillman moved to remove this item from the table. Commissioner Denahan seconded the motion that carried unanimously, Annette Stauffer of Sign Craft and Gerald Burson, President of the Company, approached the podium. Ms, Stauffer displayed graphics that depicted the originally proposed sign, When staff requested changes, new graphics were presented to the Planning & Development Board two weeks ago, The new proposal meets staff's recommendations. Commissioner Titcomb explained that although the buildings on this site have been controversial, in his opinion, they are very handsome. He felt the pole signs were not compatible with the buildings, The new drawings submitted this evening indicat~ pleasant change to a monument sign, ", -,-------- ~' ('i'{,"~" 19 f." 1'-1i'/ Ms, Stauffer explained that the smaller f . s located on 'Road is 14'-6", The larger sign on Congress Avenu ,has been reduced to 18'-6" in response to staff's recommendation to reduce the sign to less than 20', Staff also requested that the applicant reduce the width of the sign from 12' to 11', The secondary sign has been reduced by 3'. Maurice Rosenstock, One Villa Lane, a member of the Planning & Development Board, congratulated Lube Connection for the reduction in this sign. While sign appearance is a subjective opinion, Mr, Rosenstock recommends that the color combinations be limited to blend together, If the City allows everyone to put their logos on signs regardless of the colors of those logos, ,'\ serious problem will be created in this City, In response to Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz, Mr, Rumpf explained that the Community Design Plan has a limitation on colors. In the past, that restriction has been placed on the building signage itself. This sign conforms to those requirements with the exception of the color blue that replaces the color black, That change is positive and does not conflict with our Code requirements, Mr, Rumpf pointed out to the Commissioners that the sign listed on the agenda is the former sign, Staff has not yet reviewed the revision. Mr. Rumpf reviewed the proposed change with the petitioner just prior to this meeting and at a cursory glance, it appears to meet the additional restrictions placed on it by staff, II jliOA;' ...n\:ll f'l.l...U 11;;.-7 ,.tEGULAR CITY COMMISSION ~ , I BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA /",;,) " ,1 ~, , OCTOBER 6, 1998 Mr, Burson advised that the petitioner has worked very hard to give the City a very attractive complex, There will be concrete instead of blacktop throughout the project. This signage will be controlled to maintain the integrity and dignity of the property, Mayor Taylor feels a great deal can be done with landscaping, He requested that the petitioner do the best job possible with shrubbery to maintain the integrity of the Congress Avenue corridor. Mayor Taylor is pleased with the changes that were made, He would not support a motion that would approve the sign that is on the agenda, but he would support a motion to approve the revised sign, . Attorney Cherof explained that Exhibits #1 and #2 (handed out this evening) must be incorporated into the motion and be made part of the record, Commissioner Titcomb is very pleased with the correction on this project. He questioned whether or not the City has a condition with respect to the number of colors in conjunction with a project and its signs, Mr, Rumpf explained that what is currently in the Code has been applied to the building signage - not freestanding signs, Commissioner Titcomb recalled extensive discussions with the petitioners at Woolbright Place regarding colors and signage for multiple tenants to create an overall look. He questioned whether or not there could be a monochromatic approach to this sign or a limitation, Mr, Rumpf explained that the petitioner has stated that the colors will be limited to those depicted on the exhibits, The future tenants will be advertised with the color blue. Mayor Pro Tem Tillman feels the language needs to be changed so that the City dictates how a sign will appear, Ms, Stauffer agreed that no other colors would be introduced, The future tenants would have to be blue copy on white background panels, Red is being left as an option, Attorney Cherof said he is not clear on what was expressed on this condition, He questioned whether the tenant section would be consistent in color or variable in color, That needs clarification and he recommended expressing this in a condition of approval that the tenant portion of the sign be all one color, Commissioner Denahan can support this ): 'oject and suggested that revision of ':he Ordinance be addressed at the October 19th ad hoc committee meeting. Commissioner Titcomb did not feel that would be the appropriate time to address the Ordinance. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz feels prior to addressing this issue at a workshop meeting, there should be a meeting with all people involved including staff who could provide recommendations to the Commission. At the present time, the ad hoc committee is trying to develop some minimum standards for landscaping of existing buildings. Signage will be addressed at a later date following strong recommendations from staff. 12 /ICC 1.&"" M.&"U II:::>> ; REGULAR CITY COMMISSION ,.1 :y:"::~~~ ~ ~ h~ ~ m~ ~ ~ ~::::: f Commission require the developer to use only one additional color for the remainder of the tenants who would be occupying space on the sign. Motion Commissioner Titcomb moved approval subject to staff review of the exhibits tonight, the monument sign versions designated as Exhibits 1 and 2, with the two stipulations of a full review by staff on both measurements and layout of these signs as well as the stipulation of the choice of one color only for all tenant infill plaques in the remaining slots (i. e., the blue). Commissioner Denahan seconded the motion. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz appreciated the work done by the applicants to revise this plan. She further thanked the Planning & Development Board members for their perceptiveness in realizing the original sign was not suitable for the building. She is pleased with the end product. Attorney Cherof pointed out that there were seven slots shown on the exhibits that did not indicate "future tenants", For the purposes of the motion, he explained those slots should be included in the motion. Commissioner Titcomb explained that his motion implied that those spaces were for future tenants and they must be in compliance with the "one color rule". Mayor Taylor requested that the record reflect the fact that all future tenant signs would be advertised on the sign in the one color. The motion carried 5-0. G. Approve the purchase of a scoreboard and bleachers for Ezell Hester, Jr. Parle using funding from the Recreation Dedication Reserve Account #841-o0D-1-473.60. Bleachers to be purchased from Outdoor Aluminum at a cost of $18,198 under SNAPS agreement #805922, and the scoreboard to be purchased from Scoreboard Enterprises at a cost of $5,995 Mayor Taylor is in favor of the scoreboard at Hester Park, but is concerned about the cost of approximately $12,000 to purchase the scoreboard and install it. He questioned whether or not this item was put out for bid. John Wildner, Parks Superintendent, said staff did many comparisons with respect to the scoreboard and the one that is recommended was selected by P.A.L Scoreboards can cost as little as $1,500 and as much as many thousands of dollars more than the one recommended. Installation of the scoreboard is expensive from an outside contractor, but staff is confident Facilities Management would be able to do some of the work in an effort to reduce the cost of installation from the original estimate. Mr. Wildner confirmed that this scoreboard is much smaller than any scoreboard that would be found at area high schools. 13 " 51'\'\ ~,'.fl-~ 110. II f:,L 'So<..,..... cc /G/6/fg/ '" /f L eo, ~ .... f /' rnun '"" C"'-'>--.1'c-<'s G'; (Tr-'l-::.{\;CCA" - S :)'^ P'7r....i'1.. I \ fi/q: ,;( C T t' s'-S;. L d:,<:.. c~~wc~ r~_ cJ"-V, ~,r4rr~-J al If.-tv') C'{5- E-r<--k'&'v: ;;{" +-- ^ zs" , " ~ ",'W,J/;' f>ClA ~~~(kY i, :, "-11'F-1"YI cof':::{'""# r A.._' E' j ,..." (T (c r Tu-t:, r<=. {--"'^ ,^,~,,--fit .5 /"~ -/C.' 0, t::.......<:'v,S;c,", "~I art!: nc..A"--r ~ -1=-' 6,,- CP-n-,>:,'c.0,(c,-f'f<'>"'" ",f L-...--. f', /':f).;?/ · c,,, /Irr":"'~ G, e>(.)-"if 'f- Z) , S~6/-~ 1- <(z, ~ /</( S'fi-(/' r,~v;~ dh C'-",A..: f~"tn'c ~ ,0<\ , '-, J';" " -f-, !~+_. 'C... k.-.h , "'- uol(ff"'/5>"(~ Cr(<,<, ~ 51'''''''- I:> u,~ c.c(cy ( i i' IJ~~J~6~ F~.c---( Department of Department Memorandum No. PZ 98-269 TO: Kerry Willis, City Manager Mayor and City Commission Planning & Development Board ,JiJ <.--.e- FROM: Michael W, Rumpf Acting Dn ector of Planning & Zoning DATE: September 3, 1998 RE: Issues raised by Planning & Development Board regarding Auto Care Centers of America Issues raised by the Planning and Development Board at their August 25th meeting, regarding the Auto Care Center PCD (a,k.a, Boynton Shoppes), are described as follows: I) The master plan and site plan reviewed by the Planning and Development Board was revised... a substantial degree prior to fmal approval by the City Commission without fll'St bem,; reviewed lor the Planning and Development; and 2) As the project was not originally to be phased, the project should be constructed .. a ..... manner. With respect to item #1, the site plan, showing the plan as it was fmally approved _,'";._"".,. Planning and Development Board on August 26, 1997, which was between fll'St............ <II. rezoning ordinance (the unique sequence followed for processing this project was I'" "I)"''''''' 6111' dUo incomplete research into this approval process), This new infonnation was discusoed..... Job', "~I ..-....11: today, With respect to item #2, the project has received a pennit to construct a portion of the projIcd, A......... there is no phasing plan approved, the city typically issues building pennits for a portion 01& ,...;m lIut does not issue fmal certificates of occupancy until all required portions of the project OR __"'flb..i, Therefore, this project has been processed correctly to date, o '(j iD E Eo> Del'> ().- , =5U 0" Gi C< o g -' ~ c ~ ~ g> 8 land tile 0IIce ZofW1g C-l w.....a..VW Road Ellilling Pump"""'" EdmG,ddI ArnOIt:Dfth,;C ~ -- - N1f .'01 ...... / . I- ..,. ,- _ar_. -- - ., --- I'" Jr ._~ I'" - ...- II. ; hI _!. . . ...-- ..,. ..,. - '('I !U!- Land \JIetlal (12.8 DulAc.) Reslden High Denslty Zoning R1AA,PUD .,.".,..,., Detal_ Typical Po..... 't:I -:..._ i- __.. I ~_ .. ..., " r-=- , I , .1 I - 1- r-. ..,. I ~ 1 ,. &u.':: . ,::,':., "'-wi l ........111.'_.,~::_...... '-'-:''~,t~ -"l'L.r:d':~~~:'~' ':=,~ =, C='J co_ 1- / -- I I I I ' I . ft I 'I 15 ;~ I t II II, i v=-{ I:: , I _c:ioo 11''''''1 r - 22'''' --! j_, ~~ / ..r........ ,.I ~': \, '; /' -L,' , O 1 r1Il II;U . =~: \.j }I ., -,L _ '~_=.._ _ _ ---<.!,~~) --,- ft .. - " _........"'-_ 'I' 1-::"':., - w ~ I ::;:;:;::: /, _.-. .1 ~'I' ~.., r... ~~~ \;';': ,tl i.!I!~ __ ' . ~ o.taI ShOp " - \!:!:- . 1.81a.7. ~~,\, ~~J IF .__ Max2D'SiIIDaICIl , " I.., I..,. -.liCrla I Ii"" ..... A , ;... N .' .. Ulli--- (I) ,. 07/28/1998 11:42 5613756259 BOYNTON BEACH P & Z PAGE 03 1 st Review Cojllments Project name: .Kllto Care Centers of America File number: MSPM 98-002 Reference: The plans consist of 10 sheets identified as 1 st Review. Maior Site Plan Modification, File # MSPM 91...002 with a JJJIy.l~ J ~98 ,~JlQnw.ll .uP ?,oninll Dcnartment date ~mD marlcin~. :o~p t\.RThrnNTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS -'"-. Comme!llJ: None , UTILITIES CommentS: 1. Signs may not be located in or overhan~inll existina or proposed utilities easeI'Dl'nts, FIRE ~". . CQmml'flt$; NQnl' POLlCE " CommellU: None - ENG1NEBR1NG DMSION Cllmment.: NQnl' BUILDING DMSION Comments; 2. NO!4 !l\ll!lher 4 identified on the submitted su.rvey indicates ~ments were not SbOWII, Therefore, to ensure thl' proposed site signs do not encr~b an ellBetnllllt, modify the survey to include thl' easements of l'$OO1'd along the right.or.way frontage of the project, j, The site plan sl!bmiual requires lbat a site plan be included with your sllbmitta.I. Y\lllr SlIhmittal did not include a site plan, Thereforl', to PfOpl'rly review lb!O reqlle.ted signage with respect to its impact on adJllC!Ol1t projcoctl; and th.. visibility of the signag.. from adjacent rights- Ilf-way. 'lIbmit a site plan that il'lc)\Ides the adjacent rights-of-way and identifiCl.'i thll s~ of tbIl adjacellt projects. lnclllde on the site plan" note or symbol that relate!! the location of the wall signage areas that are sl10wn on tlte elevation view drawings to the bIIildings shown on the site d plan, 4, On 1I1e sheet entitled Sian ProIJ1llll Identify the color name, color-,wld ~0~ y and mll.DuflKlturer of Ibe colors DrODOsed for the pole and sian frame, A 5, On the drawiDlI that depicts tbIl GIlod Year/Gold Coast Tire sign sho.# 7' ,. ~ {~~ the syrnbollhat represents the designated sign area. - e7/2B/1998 11:42 5513755259 BOYNTON BEACH P & Z PAGE e2 Auto Care Centeu of America File N\IIIlbe.r: MSPM 98-002 Page 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PARKS AND REcREA nON -, Comments: NO!l1,\ .. ,- FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST ...- Comments: None PLANNING AND ZONING , Comments: .... 6. PllUUlin~ Division's (:()Illml,\nts concur with comments from the Building Division and UtilitillS Department ...- /bme $:~~WSPM\1.ll~~ SIGN PROGRAM 1620 S, CONGRESS AVE" BOYNTON BEACH FL., AUTO CARE CENTER, PCD WALL SIGNS: SIGN TYPE: SIZE: LETTER STYLE: COLORS: INDIVIDUAL CHANNEL LETTERS - RACEWAY MOUNTED, 1,5 SQ,FEET PER (1) LINEAR FOOT OF BUILDING FRONT OR TENANT SPACE MAX HEIGHT 24" PER CHANNEL LETTER, LOGO'S NOT TO EXCEED 20% OF SIGN (1) NATIONAL TENANTS ALLOWED THEIR OWN LETTER STYLE. (2) ALL OTHERS TO USE CLEARFACE GOTHIC BLACK, ITALICIZED 12% YELLOW PLEX #2037 RED PLEX #2283 BLACK WHITE ILLUMINATION: RACEWAY COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING, FACES: RETURNS: TRIMCAP: LOCATION: SITE SIGNS: SIGN TYPE: SIZE: ILLUMINATION: COLOR: LETTER STYLE: INTERNAL NEON ILLUMINATED, COLOR TO COORDINATE WITH PLASTIC FACE. ALL TENANTS - RED #2283 OR YELLOW #2037 BLACK BLACK, YELLOW OR RED SEE ELEVATION DRAWINGS OF BUILDINGS, NORTH, SOUTH, EAST OR WEST NOT TO EXCEED SQUARE FOOT ALLOWANCE BY CODE. POLE SIGN MULTI TENANT - MAXIMUM HEIGHT 20', SIGN (1) 1620 S, CONGRESS AVE. 13' X 12' TOTAL SQUARE FEET 156, TOTAL ALLOWED BY CODE 160 SQUARE FEET, SIGN (2) WOOLBRIGHT RD, 10' X 11' TOTAL SQUARE FEET 110, TOTAL ALLOWED BY CODE 117 SQUARE FEET. INTERNAL FLUORESCENT LAMPS, RED TO MATCH PLEX #2283- YELLOW TO MATCH PLEX #2037 - BLACK - WHITE POLE AND CABINET TO BE PAINTED WITH MA TTEWS POLYURETHANE ENAMEL COLOR BLACK (1) NATIONAL TENANTS ALLOWED THEIR OWN, (2) ALL OTHERS CLEARFACE GOTHIC BLACK ITALICIZED 12%, ALL SIGNS TO BE MANUFACTURED TO MEET U,L, NEC, AND SOUTH FLORIDA BUILDING CODES, , 'I ~ ~/S;01 SIGN PROGRAM 1620 S, CONGRESS AVE" BOYNTON BEACH FL., AUTO CARE CENTER, PCD WALL SIGNS: SIGN TYPE: SIZE: LETTER STYLE: COLORS: INDIVIDUAL CHANNEL LETTERS ' RACEWAY MOUNTED, 1,5 SQ,FEET PER (1) LINEAR FOOT OF BUILDING FRONT OR TENANT SPACE MAX HEIGHT 24" PER CHANNEL LETTER, LOGO'S NOT TO EXCEED 20% OF SIGN (1) NATIONAL TENANTS ALLOWED THEIR OWN LETTER STYLE, (2) ALL OTHERS TO USE CLEARFACE GOTHIC BLACK, ITALICIZED 12% YELLOW PLEX #2037 RED PLEX #2283 BLACK WHITE RACEWAY COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING, ILLUMINATION: FACES: RETURNS, TRIMCAP' LOCATION: SITE SIGNS: SIGN TYPE: SIZE: ILLUMINATION: COLOR LETTER STYLE: INTERNAL NEON ILLUMINATED, COLOR TO COORDINATE WITH PLASTIC FACE. ALL TENANTS, RED #2283 OR YELLOW #2037 BLACK BLACK, YELLOW OR RED SEE ELEVATION DRAWINGS OF BUILDINGS, NORTH, SOUTH, EAST OR WEST NOT TO EXCEED SQUARE FOOT ALLOWANCE BY CODE. POLE SIGN MULTI TENANT, MAXIMUM HEIGHT 20', SIGN (1) 1620 S, CONGRESS AVE. 13' X 12' TOTAL SQUARE FEET 156, TOTAL ALLOWED BY CODE 160 SQUARE FEET, SIGN (2) WOOLBRIGHT RD, 10' X 11' TOTAL SQUARE FEET 110, TOTAL ALLOWED BY CODE 117 SQUARE FEET. INTERNAL FLUORESCENT LAMPS, RED TO MATCH PLEX #2283- YELLOW TO MATCH PLEX #2037 ' BLACK, WHITE POLE AND CABINET TO BE PAINTED WITH MA TTEWS POLYURETHANE ENAMEL COLOR BLACK (1) NATIONAL TENANTS ALLOWED THEIR OWN. (2) ALL OTHERS CLEARFACE GOTHIC BLACK ITALICIZED 12%, ALL SIGNS TO BE MANUFACTURED TO MEET U,L, NEC, AND SOUTH FLORIDA BUILDING CODES, ~ Department of Development Memorandum No. PZ 98-269 TO: Kerry Willis, City Manager Mayor and City Commission Planning & Development Board , FROM: Michael W, Rumpf h\,lRI~ Acting Director of Planning & Zoning DATE: September 8, 1998 REo Issues raised by Planning & Development Board regarding Auto Care Centers of America Excerpts from previous staff reports are attached hereto and intended to indicate the review history of this project, changes to conditions occurring during the review process, the absence of any plan or approval to phase the project, and the approved design of the project relative to the permitted design, The chronology of the review is described as follows, including relevant facts associated with each review: 1) June 24, 1997 - Planning and Development Board reviews request to rezone from C-3 toPCD, o Master plan showed bay doors oriented north, toward AmocofMcDonalds; o Staff references Community Design Plan in recommendation against orientation of bay doors; o Staff recommends the placement of an archway between the retail and service buildings in order to tie the buildings together architecturally (see minutes from First Reading-August 5, 1997); o Planning & Development Board revised staff comment #21 to prohibit orientation of bay doors to street regardless of the style of door used; 2) July 1, 1997 - City Commission reviews request to rezone, o City Commission did not add comments nor alter comments; and o The minutes reflect that architectural features would be reviewed more closely on the site plan, 3) August 5, 1998 - City Commission reviews rezoning request on First Reading o Agent indicates that the site plan represents changes from master plan due to the conditions that have been placed on the project; o Agent therefore requested" some consideration when this comes to second reading for some flexibility in the conditions related to architectural details", The agent further indicated that "The condition that requires an architectural connection between the buildings presents a problem, In orienting the overhead doors on one of the service bays, it has caused the buildings to move further apart so that we can maintain sujficient site circulation in and out of the buildings, Because the buildings were moved further apart, the requirement to build an architectural feature between the buildings and meet hurricane codes and other building code standards presents problems structurally, from a cost standpoint, and aesthetically" o Rezoning approved on First Reading conditioned upon the changes (site plan) being reviewed by the Planning and Development Board prior to Second Reading of the ordinance, 4) August 26, 1998 - Planning & Development Board review site plan. o Site plan shows the tire store building moved south immediately north of the retail building, and the oil change building separated from the group of connected buildings and placed to the north of the detail shop. o Staff recommends that the master plan be rectified consistent with all conditions prior to permit (#45); o Staff recommends that the sign program be submitted and be reviewed by P & D and Commission (58); o Staff recommends that the tire store and detail shop be switched in order to prevent vehicular conflicts between project traffic and cars backing out of service bays (#59); o Staff recommends that all three buildings be connected by an arcade placed over the sidewalk between the buildings; o The Board recognized the applicant's request to omit requirement to switch buildings due to causing circulation problems (comment #59 deleted) o The Board recognized the applicant's request to omit requirement for building connections due to significant distance between buildings (comment #61 deleted); 5) September 2, 1998 - City Commission reviews rezoning request on Second Reading, 6) September 2, 1998 - City Commission reviews request for site plan approval. o The Commission approved the site plan as modified by the Planning and Development Board, including removal of condition #59 (relocate buildings to move bay doors away from main circulation driveways, and the removal of condition #61(requirement of arcade between buildings), Conclusions: I) The project was approved with the buildings located as shown on the site plan: 2) No phasing plan was shown on the site plan and therefore not reviewed nor approved; 3) No archways would be required to connect the buildings; 4) Principle changes detected from the approved plans and construction include (Detail Shop and Tire Center) replacing the row of windows shown on the west half of the Detail Shop building with masonry stucco matching remainder of building, and the replacement of the vertical stripes below Detail Shop sign with a 2nd cornice detail to match the double cornice detail shown above and below the Tire Center sign; 5) The Planning and Development Board, on August 26, 1998 reviewed the site plan showing the revised layout; and 6) The first permit issued excluded the retail building, which was issued on August 4, 1998, '~'_."" Land Use Office Zoning e,l Woolbright Road I i >D' ."" """Xl SB7"40'06"W 117.3' , ,/ , I - ----~ --- - / -- -.-. _ u_'__ .. I I ~I I I n + oil I Existing. l! 't"'ooo I McDonoldi ! 5i I I I i I I laGl~) I L,. ,;". I' I j I r ;;=c,~ , I \ :..( -ii' SSTolO08!!, 222d, i' '-1" Jl: ' //1; 'It ,!- --, - -- ( --- "'L~'.~ 'i'""'. ": "'" ,",-" ::; 1.612SF \,, - t I \" ~Ir r I ,\ , I \ (--' ' \ \ " \ [' I , '[ I Existing , Pump IsIcnd , ,", e> c<"> 'gu N HC <lJ :J C <lJ ~ Morn.menlsq'l Mol 04 Sf Foe. MCJl2fJHelQhI I 1005elbOCk , I S1opSlgrl&~ S1op6ol' ;--- ~ Tile StOle & InstallatIOn 7.015.2 SF w w <lJ a, c o U .._n vo.,..~ !dongle Am 10150 / 10M"" I.';;.~~' ~, I ~ I "C,"'" " ~I I ~': Vl$jblitvYI i::\.I( i~ ft;) 351,48' $$ !" !~ I N8nD'OB'E r n..,._:ll ..".. :il _1_"[ Land Use High Density Residential (12,8 Du,{ Ac,) Zoning R1AA,PUD g -..... _Ila R.ten"~ D.35ACr ( Typical Parking Detail - .. l I I I I [ I II : \ I :r- I I I is .. I li\ [ I~ [ IE [ '! --- llulferWdl ~l ....- -- I..... ,..,-t Ace._' -- _6 Sldewal~ HondlCODoed '''''''' I ~...- 1 JIM _. I ,,'- ...., - - ::::Iil I I - .~~- - ,_. -- -- /' I~!' = _~lii _ _:_ "- q _:~. ~ I I 1 r rn- - -.---- _~__-./ ....f::t !'l' , ~" -=i!L \ 6.. WhIle Poinl90 s_ ... N , 9' -Y_ ___.. ~'I' Ulli-..-".. , - - - ~ laGrMl1t>ell ..... a '0 Q; E mEe> =>8CM u _ -E ' c ,- 0 U OON ""Q; '" a o .3 Site Plan '5 U a; E E o Ol UCC"1 'C ' - 0 U Q ...~ Ql c: '5 u o -' Ql ::> c '" > <( :l Ql 5> c o U ,. .J fYla. '>icr 7 k'Y'---- Land Use Office Zoning C'] Typical Parking Detail - III', 'j . liSlat......" ~~ I Woolbright Road "'" """ ""'.. -. :.... .-' S87"40"08"W 117.3' __ "':L -.1-'.- '~.,..,u : I~: - ~ ~fl::-' Iii I' , ~ 'I ; H I"; I " " n II I ~ ij II! .=- ,~ Ii: I I I' ~, ;~ I '='1' - "I . ExlSftng Pump Island b1Sflng AmOCO J McDonaldl ~ ~_c- - _ 587'olD'CO::,:,c 22.!15' :==I Ii I I' I : :JT'!~ I ~ iT ,..! - 1__~__.__----.o.l_-=_-::=_t_ _ -::-::-..~-__ .i L.' r'~ ..... i:1 ~ i:l ': Ii> , -I f '--"--IQI~ ,I~ 1::::=-1 ;~ =- _ a, (i -J - -- ~ ,.. ~ ~ =~::,' ! I.~ . 1-- ') "."-'" -..:-. --.-.........".....,--..-- ~.- TIIQ Store & IMtOlIah6h 7.D152Sf -._ __~ .:r... "'- . / ~;,.- - -~ /' ----..... "~ j . l"'~ i .!'- . ~ -,I~ j -, ~ --:J--!"---?:. ~ -till ~I \l'" j ~~J :01 ,$ lil Q) __.-;:i~ ; =" - - tI, -- """.. ----- , "_ >it '-~'!!oo ~ ' ' ~=-(. ----U~;_ij.M;--- .----/' ADT u",- ... ie """ 1J i L '. N8r4J~ 351M" "'::-- _IL. -"""" '36"""" tl', ,,} ~!~!..... I Jj Land Use High Density Residentlol (12,8 Du'; Ac,) Zoning R1AA,PUD " ~ .. 6.- 6.- ,- WI1n_Po"", :d ...... """""..... , 5' 12' t1CIroa~--,1 ~., ~ -- N .' .. lWJ-_.~ - -- J-"O::- o 11 ~ mEa :J8ct'? '0_"0 (S:gre -' ill '" o u o -' (I): N {-(oM 'f'e:\'" -l E ~ PI "}1'.tW' ..... ~ Q PI m -l r ~ 10 ... r < ., U> )> 1: -I S6 ... () \J Z ... m .... -f ~ 1> -,' , r ~ (fl m r. .", ~ () .. 1) = " . -,: , .. , ~ ... -, .... "-, ~ t \, ~;~;; li .;;~. .." '~';1: ~~i'~;~'~ ~". :"'" ..,..... .f, ;~ '\j' ,,; ,/., . ~:' .: ~', "^~~ :t.;;:_: 'c. -f ~": ,:~.; ~ ~;~f~~~~ ,.(. :1;,;.: y~~_,.-..~t ~'\1 'i ~ tn- 1" t (), " 'm;," '''Z ,..... ...' m" ~, ' ,h J" ~ . ~ :_ ,', ,:;', 'l" .; ~~:\~~~~~l "Y," \~'s;L" '~. ~#,:.' "~~~L:. ',>~;~~ ",\( 'Ii"<' ., I""'~ " ,. ,'Ii.:,',,', ,~;r.v .: _'. '~~~"':c"...:.it;'l". h f ~'_ ,,-;t .~, \~r1i(Jf<":']'!;l~,, ,.. ., /><,.' "', .... ~ . A. YAK:J: "-'";;.". ;.:-:P:'~~ "->., iJI ' . ...~ .~............oAii~ TEMPORARYP~~q:t '_......;~"',..~ - 'JUL l!)~'_':,t ::;,;:;,,:;;,,-c..';,1...\~,>;;, '",. ~"t;~;:.i-~'t- PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ',;,;(:;:\~;, ~'C-? . ~'_..:.~..:.......::y)_:~l. The fonowing submissions to the Building Division are required prio~to P~~~f~~ all temporary parking facilities: : f- ,>-,:';i/ "'''"ffi .~( 1. A completed perimt application ,:1:€~',~~":~}' 'Po 2. Site plan to scale (two copies)'....''''!'':.,.:..-,'W 3. Cross-section of materials to be used ," 4. Payment of basic permit fee ($35) 5. Written permission of property owner if different than applicant I. , ,',,'I ,.::J " (. {. ') J .' __....__l -C...;.!.......' ~ 1-'0 \ , .".... ...... '~ ~ <.J 'c'''' ~ :",:....'" ~ ~~<.. ~:-;~<:.:: . " B. For temporary parking facilities where the public is invited, the following additionilJ requirements prevail: " ',:, ,__g;'~ '. "r~ 1. Additional site plan detail to demonstrate compliance with landscaping, SigiJ. and haxidi~ accessibility requirements'. -,:', ' ;};:~ 2. Additional fee based on $ 16 per $ 1 ,000 of value less credit for basic pen1nt fee " . 3. Restoration surety to cover cost of restoring property to original state. 4, Adequate parking as determined by Planning & Zoning Department n. COl'oH)ITIONS OF REVIEW & APPROVAL A. Review: 1. Primary review by the Department of Development , ' , .. 2, Secondary reviews by Planning, Parks, Police, Fire, Public Works and UtilitieS.-Dep......ll.uenh B. 2, Temporary parking facilities shall conform to the following minimum standards: I, Drive and parking surfaces must be constructed of pavement, paving block, mulch or othe surface adequate to control blowing dust or other nuisances acceptable to the city engineer Spaces for the handicapped must be paved, Curbs or curb stops must be provided on all parking stalls Dimensions must conform with Chapter 23, Article II from the Boynton Beach Lan, Development Regulations, Landscaping/tree preservation must conform with current codes Drainage must be acceptable to the office of the city engineer Current handicap codes Parking will not be allowed bet\'l'een sundown and sunup unless adequate lighting is instaIle and approved by the Director, , ,), 4. 5, 6, 7, m. OCCUP.~'iCYIREMOVAL A. Permits are valid for one year. Renewals will be considered on a case-by-case basis. B. All temporary parking facilities must be removed from the site and the site restored prior r issuance of final Certificate of Occupancy/Completion or expiration of permit, whichev, occurs first. C-2b WVH:bh l:!l20/94, Rev 3f"'-3195, 5/10/95 6/:61'95. 7i15i95. 1,9196, 215,96 C:\W~~~60\~CCCS\?C~ICYXH\5?~CC8N\T~P?~~~.WPO 5~ DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: .....J. VII'+-- 0-. /(d- " Auto Care Centers of America rHeise PCD) - Sign Program -k'-X "c A \f., 't \u-r Date: Project Name: Applicant: Agent: Location: File No.: Land Use Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Type of Use: Number of Units: Square Footage: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM #98-257 J",)-l , v~("- ~ ~- ~ I/o ~ ,~-'i -<,' .t' Jo "C 6-"> . ,.c J ' LV' 4--'b ''"' c...... . (".< ""'\ L (./ <.- ~ "? <..-<,.,\.. \c,..........-< Cf ,..2.- u5' L b<"'~v'-'" SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION September 4, 1998 Auto Care Centers of America Sign Craft (Annette Stauffer) 1620 South Congress Avenue ---, --------- j; ~""Q" Local Retail Commercial (LRC) Planned Commercial District (PC D) Small strip shopping center including automotive repair services and retail/commercial uses, N/A Site Area: Building Area: NJA N/A Surrounding land uses and zoning: (see Exhibit "A" - locati,on map) North: McDonald's/Amoco service station, zoned C-3, Community Commercial. South: Christian Villas residential development, zoned R-3j (11"(1;-;'",; (r -c<"s :cA. East: ~Bank, zoned C-3; Crm YI1vrtr-IJ C""'71"te(C'I_'( , :-\(.J'>'< , ,'" \J,.. ':)'" 1,,,,,J;c Page 2 Memorandum # 98-257 Auto Care Centers of America - Sign Program MSPM 98-002 Existing Site Characteristics: Request: Concurrency: Parking Facility: Landscaping: Building and Site Regulations: Signage/Community Design Plan: West: Right-of-way of Congress Avenue and farther west is a vacant building, zoned C-3, This request is for sign program approval for the Auto Care Center PCD, The subject PCD is currently under construction, The purpose of this proposal is to establish design gUidelines for signage for all tenants of the Auto Care Center PCD. This original project received site plan approval on September 2, 1997, and was process without a sign program primarily due to uncertainty of ultimate tenants (and sign needs). The sign program request includes: · Two, 20 foot high (the maximum allowed for pylon signs) monument signs (see Exhibits "B" - proposed monument sign locations) advertising: Lube Connection, Goodyear and future undesignated tenents, One on Congress Avenue and one on Woolbright Road. . wall and building signs for all the above listed tenants. Traffic N/A Drainage - N/A N/A N/A According to the City's Land Development Regulations Chapter 21, Signs Article IV, Signs Allowed, Section 7, Signs permitted in planning districts. B, Sign Program, the City must approve via a sign program allowable signage for all PUD's, PC D's and PI D's for specific allowable signage, The purpose of this section is to encourage continuity for signage in these districts, while allowing for flexibility with respect to type, color, number, location (exclusive of setbacks) and design of signs, The approval of signs in planned districts requires the submission of a sign program for the entire project as part of the site plan approval process, The purpose of the Community Design Plan, Chapter 9 of the Land Development Regulations is to promote harmony with nature and a pleasant and comprehensive Page 3 Memorandum # 98-257 Auto Care Centers of America - Sign Program MSPM 98-002 cohesiveness among development within the City of Boynton Beach. This site is adjacent to the Amoco/MsDonald's on the southeast corner of Woolbright Road and Congress Avenue, The Amoco/McDonald's was approved in August 1995 by the City Commission, At that time building exterior wall trim and finish was approved as aquamarine and antique white with accents of black and grey for the pump island canopy and canopy column, The two proposed site signs (one facing Congress and the second Woolbright) are proposed to have as primary colors red and yellow. These colors match the red and yellow colors that are utilized by Amoco/McDonald's on the corner. The signage submitted by the applicant meets the City's Land Development Regulation and a uniform sign appearance is established with this application for the overall corner. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Division recommends approval of this sign program for the Autocare Centers of America, subject to the comments included in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. \\CH\MAIN\SHRDA T A \Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTSIAUTOCARE CENTER\MSPM\staff-report-sign program,doc xc: Central File Page 2 Memorandum # 98-257 Auto Care Centers of America - Sign Program (1VISPfi,f'~,) West: Existing Site Characteristics: Right-of-way of Congress Avenue and farther west is a vacant building, zoned C-3! t~~mm~1q C::'-"""v<'-o"'c ;0. This request is for sign program approval for the Auto Care Center PCD. The subject PCD is currently under construction. The purpose of this proposal is to establish design guidelines for signage for all tenants of the Auto Care Center PCD, This original project received site plan approval on September 2, 1997, and was process without a sign program primarily due to uncertainty of ultimate tenants (and sign needs), :r----- r- Request: The sign program request includes: . Two, 20 foot high (the maximum a%~ed for pylon signs) monument signs (see Exhibits "B" - proposed monument sign locations) advertising: Lube Connection, Goodyear and future undesignated tenents, One on Congress Avenue and one on Woolbright Road, . 0, , rJ.; n r wall and building signs for all the above listed tenants, I", ,g-c'-"(' f /? ,.,-,,,, ~ ...f:::.-;4-/".:,'r I6"S5 ~C(f't:- />1...,0"7'<' rlI...<-....... 6> l''/v,-_.-_.0. ~s-..L' C-V'- !"'-'1-""r Traffic ,-- ~N/Ar (;< ,(~ '-r ~< ,A~- , . Concurrency: Drainage - N/A Parking Facility: N/A Landscaping: N/A Building and Site Regulations: According to the City's Land Development Regulations Chapter 21, Signs Article IV, Signs Allowed. Section 7, Signs permitted in planning districts, B, Sign Program, the City must approve via a sign program allowable signage for all PUD's, PC D's and PID's for specific allowable signage. The purpose of this section is to encourage continuity for signage in these districts, while allowing for flexibility with respect to type, color, number, location (exclusive of setbacks) and design of signs, The approval of signs in planned districts requires the submission of a sign program for the entire project as part of the site plan approval process. Signage/communit~ f-5,. 1 j f' fe", {,,,>ccncc~ iCe"," l"'''\''--, (,r C: {~ ,- @:/'. Design Plan: The purpose of the Community Design Plan, Chapter 9 of the Land Development Regulations is to promote harmony with nature and a pleasant and comprehensive Page 3 Memorandum # 98-257 Auto Care Centers of America - Sign Program , " \, ~ .:Y \i'\ cohesiveness among di,elopment within t~City of Boynton Beach, This site is adjacent to the Amoco/ s onald's on the utheast corner of Woolbright Road and Congress Avenue, The oco/McDonald's as approved in August, 1995 by the City Commission, At that time. 'elil ';'18 exterior wall trim and finish was approved as aquamarine and antique white with accents of black and grey for the pump island canopy and canopy column, , , ),,\, 0., /~"t""" - /?_' ~ The two prop sed Ite signs ne fac' g Congress and th see d Woolbright) are (J!) proposed to h ve s primary c lor ed and yellow, Thes co rs match the red and . yellow colors t are utilize oco/McDonald's on th mer, The signage submitted by t pplicant meet the City's Land Develop nt Regulation and a uniform sign ppe ranee is est bl hed with this applicati n the overall corner. " RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Division recommends approval of this sign program for the Autocare Centers of America, subject to the comments included in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval, \\CH\MAIN\SHRDA T A \Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\AUTOCARE CENTER\MSPM\staff-report-sign program,doc xc: Central File ([) .:/' Yl tJ-,c' C ,.vi. Co-~-=--- ~~'.,)~ I' 'F'-..z. I~- S,/n f'J'--~,v- f-sjl\{ Irlf ....-1.:: - 5'~ //;," ~- w/rt S 'J..... CL~''',S /,?, J ,-/{,,-- !-f:,_ f' r- y-.ty ~Z'^- ry- . .;-?_ [z>2.;. /(j2. J 4 -f"!P- c 0- /---- 1, C~f'Y'. ,-----Aft Zh 'J--- ~;{~,,/Jlc.<--/ w;- -" ", ~ t'''f'':~g.5.g-.-- l' Hrr<'r<'L ,-" ?(~/ I ..J ' I, ',/ -.u5r5'c~ .:-.tC.... r{, ~ ;k,<J C=<cu (r&.....J.(. ((" /1"'7" 7y" r.., ./ y.- ~_ (::^::~f /"~":~"- ~ ~/<re ~~~*"'-~ ~~-(- ;; CAf' y~~~:c~~~~<, ::~~\ . T (L~~~r. ~ ~:~, _ ~ ~,~ ~r~_ ~ v'4 ~ ~t.r f4 ';'I 5::]",5/ ^' 1*,'~p P~t.-A~ , ,_ ~(2)~..c.J~ -J..--.t2,~ 1M < U.LJ ~~ r-<- s Lil'<J )Vlo ,x, ~<. "'" 6--- t'r.~/~ 6~,.D <M.. EXHIBIT "e" Conditions of Approval Project name: Auto Care Centers of America File number: MSPM 98-002 Reference: The plans consist of8 sheets identified as Auto Care Centers Silm Program with a Julv 7, 1998 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking, DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: None UTILITIES Comments: None FIRE Comments: None POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: None BUILDING DIVISION Comments: None PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: None PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: None ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 1. To be determined, ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 2, To be determined, /bme s:\projects\cond of appr\ , 15/%, /}6 r L - 'f' "'> /~~() -'irr frl (jCVL<~ _ (.... ~- ~l (-=-(,;.J &~E-(~' R& b>d\~f [~,-,,,.JJ ,-(-0 ~ D~Cs' ?~ peJ2 f-- J~(,~ f- ~.fu 12.(~ t;/"{,c<f:' ().. (. -r~~'c;;., hr; c.. (,I - ~ c~y - < "-'-A--rr<....,+- -~ (..c.,~ /'-iw r T ~ .~d~ k:>{.,e il S L~ 1 SL-- . . ,64'....1-- ?~ .,. , I I i c ()~ {J\, , 1 ! I I I [. (.t~<:.. A.. "L~ /i'".,r (1' 2.'" \ : - ,----------, !~~ ~? :!~ -~- " -..l....! -------------- " , :" / .) / ! / 2 ~, ---------~ '? r _..~_.~-~-- ,.-- ~ " It ---> ~0 "'-, rv v \ f'1 -5> ~ ;7') f'Y',c f '(7 j;) 1-/-' -(, 5 ~l" 'J"--- ., ~ ,c.( Leo F'<,C~,~c. ,'" & :c." +1 7 +-L. -r~o,,~;oS; /'<,"!--'" .5 C_, cJ: It., "5 -1" (?,(. i/<'.- ';,', ,dYj 6-^i>- 4 ~ :7" /':1" r-i~ ~':e.. ( dJ") L c-=--;'fj"e-;~. ~~("\ 1~ ,,~. t1.._~ /r/c I'; c~s<(7' /".~/.. --f-(~ 6,< t.,'-rc-./:J,-r;.-,-;. c~<l C'" t;cn'~,.t i::- <--f I r: -f-,> t.; Fi'-tYC~-/~' ~- 4!; l' 'I-' ---( <0c, r:;( " :/S . t--1c.,-., co.~ L',r;<';"'I1..:'> ,r:-/' .~~( "'-~)i'- __ ~.. 3..' jVC f<"'-r:,[ -h-o'r''S:~cL_U S?"S ~~(:",...,~,~:z.. G- ,~r.--,,::;ti. ~ ~ -f';C2, c, I' r..,y",<-I~,<.".( r..=;"-'/"rf"'\ oy^(~ --1 ;... ~- :)~'/<:" ,I-h'1'-=-- .-- . ~ (S' j:;, ,,,,( 5 " 7) ~~- ~ I'~ h _ - r L,,'/d'Y;5' (Ct,c~,7'? CCA>).",,<d'-( Dr' c.J" ?(;,.~. I IV"'-l', IJ (., -t~(YI 4 r ( l :J> ,'~l:<k::. f~....... f<o.:"< t-,o.').... f'"-f'<~':"" T'{,~<","--fc. "'~ I J .SfiJ f\.s --/::J; Iryc<.)<.< ",,',<, (=>V---7'~,(,.(--, ~-f(- vJ,.f/, --f{.. ,~-dJ"<~''-~ S:I"3--C~ -fk.... S _~(~:.,t- -i"Jc~ '?, =-,,!::7.. ~Y\< 'DJ" ~ (cC:,. /..{-;.,c~ L:;- (, ,,,J, i l s ",~Jl C:o<r... /" .:;5 t/n'P-l '7: -r;<, -f- ,If-- ,-(.r r,/< ...) \i ,,\,.~ ~ " ..~, ,., ""c. , -( c ,,<>-.,-~ n~, ,,""'"' So -S (,U'~C 6""-., , q ('] n...f---,- . r t<-J~ ,~ <oL c~(~" 6"'.+ \,.r~1;3-=L, -(_.(<,- ~- t-L- 1 c-i [: " I) CC'''-'-d' -'-( c ;fY ~ 'tI"t;-r-i..." \" '4i {i-( t v- f~' >'>1 Q!:'~~: r~]" , , -r-t...! L t-, V --vJ -, ,-. , I L ).L.IA /r:J-?' eel { <'-//<:-1-,. k.:(" '-"-lO'_~,,-\-'t:'_ -r.'"'c-'~/h',;':,' ""''''Ik y~ cc~ (.'ov(ef' rn. -(i, i'. -f~ ~ r>" 0 j / ~ ' ,', ' , K. C~ ,',.--- ,/ ']~c: r:"" '"" t., ,~ ,k- 1"10 i'J. C-c;, , ~. , _.s 'J 6ltt _ "S7. f::: ' . , ? Y"r :)':.0 . - i-- fc...... 11-/ a:, c;-e. 1'L,~, .-:. -: 1'-' cn .,f --rf." (", ,- ~'.,..,.. (f- ~-s;.T"" p / S/': Vf1 1...-1 f~'''''''''' " .L /'/'LJ - Ie _ \...... v'1"l"- r r'J1^-\""'\ 7 hd.; "",~e.. ~ 1l?CcY\s.J-S, ~~"""T C(;if....-r~ I'k f./~' '''Jf ',..t.- f' .5P ~ , I ,e.r"" ..e.~ti5 '" rf-5oe.. c:. ~C'r -(..... "-i,; ttJ ,:) A rY"-/"'--( IS '* </.r 07 v,se-,f /-,,,,-,,,,,-0.''(' <c-, 'f--( , } ( Cl...cc.;...C-f....-<"--}.'\.f c.'" I/'~ r)/'yf~.v...7~ /~ G"'.:.-..... ci1,j 'S,}/?<s '5(, // 6., ~C'.s,:r'~1- G-'c~ 7S---~ <>t-S ('" "1 6/ ~ ,,~r..dcc-r'n'_ 0(<>- 6<-"'-<.("-;1- &,r!. k.sfy.<-t' Z -erIc>,.' \ - y ~,~., JY-.,<>' ,. is 7 ~~ I??': ~.<-C 15 l'k'(' 111 J//T~" 1 I.. {' 0'lC'''_y G- ) , +f... s,)"~n r'~~J/...It.'- '1'J'J~(~<:(J -fC-" s-:.y-'" fv "- J 7>', i-\c.-( ~}, "'] ": r ,/ '~{; "C' V + , ~ '''''05 y,< .o?-o_ ('y g ~ '/':)" "/)0,". (e-(" / ~ c"'" '-' O. '1 J;.' /'. 71 ,r; -r'--G.. -s V h-- -('rv.:d .--5,. >,e - rf> -- he T (. ~ ,/.( p, (/'k'C'z5--7h~~s~ ..5,/".5 cr~~ I'd- ;*' k<... /d;'" --{i,..( ,J. _ec" I.~, -rLr? -/'L 1< J"~- fi~~-Z?' dL 1"~ ~&c.,~ -t' < l.-s ,--wi' "rr"'<"C -r-z;:: -I'd' 0-1 -f~r>-?r,'fl '---"..\ )VI,.k ,{ /")Fe""; ""'>ZC" C<O-""f'" ",--A'(".r:'f w?.f-t: 'L~'~cr;e~ S.)",,).<---, (;.,..'I.~~ "- -s (..;ft:_~<'~ r(Or~se!) 5j'fM o.....-E::. ~,.c f~, L 1'./i ,'~. .__<_r>>, Z <' ,--,--Ct -' -- , I-J w/"~~ (./..<?r"rj,-...-( _,~h-J:S; -:..1' cc".G. c2cJ ;:"--1' h:r( /,.J; /S6' C'h c:C-"',-,(., ~-)'vrc,'ts~:J (,J/-r:{ L .-,-srv"" -!;'cf' G'-.n.5-.1 / 'c, 5?-.. ---"'-- (::.~-f br ) j ~ ~~ ,...>-c~,,-5A r?;7c ~'<c (~~ / A /7? "c C s ?'"' ,..~5 .--<- j, , r ''''''1J' Grr ;-/<.... ,,c..(r . (, --{ 7 f-~, -.r c,.;; j~ u'--r( """- ,'5 ~7 "- "-,-"",,,... (-, .r ~ f-'G {" c- ..,,,- f"" t -rJu- ;orl ,-L -I/o 5(,...<.... (....-f"' S'? '- c' ,(",y..,L i> r'-- (,..Jc-^-(~"J4. l'~,z/...' :{if' 5, c<-c. (~, ,,/...( 1,<<.. r.' < /~1 C:~,-: .,~. P!.. I-- (>< f(. f-' -f-t~ 5'L>'. T:-L5 i- L-1')f( 5 j VI ,/ ~,(./~t! (ff /,., r -r/.,~ c '0"', ~ -f c' f 0, j';?r ~ role S J' " "'C q' 'I Sf"7/''' >,'/ /'", -f ''''-,(y bcJ .J5"_V~ f;'",f-- /"'l ", f ""-\. V r. ( -f:--i "'~, ~ ~,:" 1,," (< -(,-~ {I' f'. U=~ (orr' ~-< ((r G -f6 ? f2~l) ~ l; {'.K. (/I' ~ {"a( i. 0,' pCt' I'\. c,~" >, ,/ >,,,), . /' )fy:u ",-( IL_ -h ; -k-~ u- ~I ( tC v...{~. l...iS(. .\~' -); r<- b <I;' (f.. ( ?J3 , r' ry,' ~~.J. 1(L 'iA~ J. ..,.(, c'~"'.7 --I( c.s;' ?".> k,v.e. rv::.f- ./ J{oL. cr,\ C"-,-,,.,( 'T'o(C.~"'\'-'-{.'\ /f"-<-Y- Cc;;V'+-, 11..-,..'f DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM #98-257 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION Date: September 4, 1998 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project Name: Auto Care Centers of America (Heise PC D) - Sign Program Applicant: Auto Care Centers of America Agent: Sign Craft (Annette Stauffer) Location: 1620 South Congress Avenue File No.: MSPM 98-002 Land Use Plan Designation: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) Zoning Designation: Planned Commercial District (PCD) Type of Use: Small strip shopping center including automotive repair services and retail/commercial uses, Number of Units: N/A Square Footage: Site Area: Building Area: N/A N/A Surrounding land uses and zoning: (see Exhibit "A" - location map) North: McDonald's/Amoco service station, zoned C-3, Community Commercial. South: Christian Villas residential development, zoned R-3, East: Bank, zoned C-3, 1 st Review Comments Project name: Auto Care Centers of America File number: MSPM 98-002 Reference: The olans consist of 10 sheets identified as 1st Review, Maior Site Plan Modification, File # MSPM 98-002 with a Julv 7, 1998 Planning and Zoning Deoartment date stamo marking, DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: None UTILITIES Comments: 1. Signs may not be located in or overhanging existing or proposed utilities easements, FIRE Comments: None POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: None BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 2, Note number 4 identified on the submitted survey indicates easements were not shown, Therefore, to ensure the proposed site signs do not encroach an easement, modify the survey to include the easements of record along the right-of-way frontage of the project. 3. The site plan submittal requires that a site plan be included with your submittal. Your submittal did not include a site plan. Therefore, to properly review the requested signage with respect to its impact on adjacent projects and the visibility of the signage from adjacent rights- of-way, submit a site plan that includes the adjacent rights-of-way and identifies the sue of the adjacent projects, Include on the site plan a note or symbol that relates the location of the wall signage areas that are shown on the elevation view drawings to the buildings shown on the site plan, 4, On the sheet entitled Sign Program identify the color name, color-code and manufacturer of the colors proposed for the pole and sign frame, 5, On the drawing that depicts the Good Year/Gold Coast Tire sign show the symbol that represents the designated sign area, Auto Care Centers of America File Number: MSPM 98-002 Page 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None FORESTERlENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: None PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 6. Planning Division's comments concur with comments from the Building Division and Utilities Department. /bme s:\projects\Autocare\MSPM\1 st review comments 1 st Review Comments Project name: Auto Care Centers of America File number: MSPM 98-002 Reference: The plans consist of 10 sheets identified as 1 st Review. Maior Site Plan Modification, File # MSPM 98-002 with a Julv 7,1998 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking, DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: None UTILITIES Comments: 1. Signs may not be located in or overhanging existing or proposed utilities easements, FIRE Comments: None POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: None BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 2, Note number 4 identified on the submitted survey indicates easements were not shown, Therefore, to ensure the proposed site signs do not encroach an easement, modify the survey to include the easements of record along the right-of-way frontage of the project. 3, The site plan submittal requires that a site plan be included with your submittal. Your submittal did not include a site plan, Therefore, to properly review the requested signage with respect to its impact on adjacent projects and the visibility of the signage from adjacent rights- of-way, submit a site plan that includes tne adjacent rights-of-way and identifies the sue of the adjacent projects, Include on the site plan a note or symbol that relates the location of the wall signage areas that are shown on the elevation view drawings to the buildings shown on the site plan, 4, On the sheet entitled Sign Program identify the color name, color-code and manufacturer of the colors proposed for the pole and sign frame, 5, On the drawing that depicts the Good Year/Gold Coast Tire sign show the symbol that represents the designated sign area, f!}~-frr- r'-"-< 1(1(1'1 Project name: Auto Care Centers of America File number: MSPM 98-002 I~~ - Reference: The plans consist of 10 sheets identified as 1st Review, Maior Site Plan Modification, File # MSPM 98-002 with a Julv 7, 1998 Planning and Zoning Deoartment date stamo marking, 1 st Review Comments DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: None UTILITIES Comments: ~) Signs may not be located in or overhanging existing or proposed utilities easements, FIRE Comments: None POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: None BUILDING DIVISION Comments: \ ~,. -(' ;5" 2, Note number 4 identified on thc submitted survey indicates easements / -o/Y-,\o were not shown, Therefore, to ensure the proposed site signs do not ','l' encroach an easement, modify the survey to include the easements of~ record along the right-of-way frontage of the project, ;I The site plan submittal requires that a site plan be included with your submittal. Your submittal did not include a site plan. Therefore, to properly review the requested signage with respect to its impact on adjacent projects and the visibility of the signage from adjacent rights- of-way, submit a site plan that includes the acijacent rights-of-way and identifies the sue of the adjacent projects, Include on the site plan a note or symbol that relates the location of the wall signage areas that are shown on the elevation view drawings to the buildings shown on the site plan, / On the sheet entitled Sign Program identify the color name, color-code and manufacturer of the colors proposed for the pole and sign frame, I On the drawing that depicts the Good Year/Gold Coast Tire sign show the symbol that represents the designated sign area, APPLICATION TRACKING LOG PR01ECT TITLE: Auto Care Centers of America (Heise PC D) FILE I: MSPM 98,002 PR01ECT LOCATION: southeast comer of Woolbright Road and Conness Ave. TYPE OF APPLICATION: Maior Site Plan Modification PUBLIC NOTICE REOUlRED: (YIN) 0 REVIEWER'S NAME AGENT: Annette Stauffer - SI"" Craft ADDRESS: AGENT PHONE: 561,863.3660 FAX: 561.863-3661 DATE REC'D: 717/98 AMOUNT: RECEIPT NO.: 12 SETS OF PRE-ASSEMBLED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW: 2 OF 12 SETS SIGNED AND SEALED 0 SURVEY 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 FLOOR PLAN 0 SITE PLAN WITH SITE DATA 0 APPLICATION/SUBMITTAL: DATE ACCEPTED: DRAINAGE PLAN ELEVATION VIEW DRAWINGS COLORED ELEVATIONS RECEIVED MATERIAL SAMPLES RECEIVED PHOTOGRAPHS RECEIVED o o o o o DATE DENIED: DATE OF LETTER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: INITIAL 1ST REVIEW MEMO: DATE SENT: MEMO NO. 98-208 RETURN DATE: 7/24/98 PLANS 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED [W PLANS MEMOI POLICE _ PLANNING 0 BLDG/ENGR 0 FORESTER UTlL. P.W. PARKS FIRE 9r-,J/l'7 "J<J DATE OF LETTER SENT TO SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: DA E 90 DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE (ASSEMBLED) SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2ND REVIEW: PRE-ASSEMBLED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW: AMENDED APPLICATION 0 2 OF12 SETS SIGNED AND SEALED 0 SURVEY 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 FLOOR PLAN 0 SITE PLAN WITH SITE DATA 0 2ND REVIEW MEMO: DATE SENT: DRAINAGE PLAN ELEVATION VIEW DRAWINGS COLORED ELEVATIONS RECEIVED MATERIAL SAMPLES RECEIVED TRANSPARENCY RECEIVED PHOTOGRAPHS RECEIVED o o o o o o MEMO NO. RETURN DATE: 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANS MEMOI DATE PLANS MEMOI DATE UTlL. 0 POLICE 0 P.W. 0 PLANNING 0 PARKS 0 BLDS/ENGR 0 tn, J15' 0/2-1 FIRE 0 FORESTER 0 BOARD MEETING DATE: LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY. DATE SENT / SIGNS INSTALLED: DATE: BOARD: CITY COMMISSION: DATE: DEVELOPMENT ORDER RECEIVED FROM CITY CLERK: 0 DATE: DEVELOPMENT ORDER SENT TO APPLICANT: 0 DATE: S:\FORMS\TRACKING LOG FORM revised 4/25/97 FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION Memorandum No. 98-287 0,'. , '''I '.,' , ...- NFPA Life Safety Code 101, National Fire Code 1, all applicable National Fire Protection Association codes, and the City Fire code shall be adhered to, TO: Mike Rumpf, Act. Director Planning & Zoning Division FROM: Steve Gale, Fire Marshal .7 V Deputy Chief - Fire Rescue Department DATE: July 10, 1998 SUBJECT: Auto Care Center SE Corner of Congress Ave, & Woolbright Rd, MSPM 98-002 We have no comments at this time, CC: File o ~ n \VI rn Ellanson, Beverly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Mazzella, Pete Tuesday, July 14, 1998 11 :20 AM Ellanson, Beverly Milor, Skip Auto Care Center of America (fka Boynton Shoppes, fka Heise PCD) We offer the following comment on this MSPM for sign age: 1) Signs may not be located in, or overhanging existing or proposed utilities easements, A memo will follow, Please also note that I will be on vacation from July 24 thru August 5, Skip Milor will be attending TRC in my absence, At the present, he can receive e-mail from City Hall, His phone is 375-6407, Thanks, Pete 1 MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT, NO, 98 - 194 .. -'.,-. -~".- -"...._~" -~j TO: /~ Rumpf, Acting Planning Director FROM:~JOhn A~, Utilities Director ::1 ,JUL 151998 Ii! '" "10"' "j~"..J ,. I ,..'~ ,', "..,_.,..m~,,~.,"""_W;__'" DATE: July 14, 1998 SUBJECT: Master Site Plan Modification - Auto Care Center of America (flea Boynton Shoppes, aka Heise PC D) We offer the following comment on this MSPM for signage: 1) Signs may not be located in, or overhanging existing or proposed utilities easements. Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella(375-6404) or Clyde "Skip" Milar (375-6407) of this office. JAG/PVM XC: Skip Milar File I., r j . l.i : [~'_..._._.. ,- fii i' .JUt. I 5 ,., d ,I " ! j 7 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #98-191 TO: Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning & Zoning Director C, Larry Roberts, Public Works Director ctfL- THRU: FROM: Mark Lips, Sanitation Foreman SUBJ: Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review - Auto Care Center of America DATE: July 14, 1998 The Public Works Department has no comments or objections to the above named site plan modification, -JPa~ ML/cr i .,.~.".,_,.JJ ! , , "..-._",_..J CuY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: M, Rumpf DATE: SUBJECT: Ofc, R~ REFERENCES: _ ENCLOSURES: I have no comments reference this site plan modification, FROM: 071698 FILE: Auto Care Center of American PZ 98-208 oo~ MSPM 98-002 ~ ~ \!l ~ .u. I 6 1900 PlANNING AND ONING DEPT. 00 RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Rumpf, Acting Director of Planning and Zoning Kevin John Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist t<J Auto Care Center of America (Heise PCD) Major Site Plan Modification-Ist Review FROM: Re: DATE: July 23,1998 ~ ~ B WI ~ JI. 24. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPI I have no comment on the above request. The applicant has addressed all of the existing trees on the site, The project should continue in the normal review process, Kjh File 00 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. DD 98-232 001 rnn\Ylrn 00 A2a. FROM. Michael Rumpf Acting Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael E. Haag, Plan Review Administr ~f.~ Raymond F, Davidson, PE" City En'- e U-)O July 24, 1998 PLANNING AND ZONING DEI'[ TO DATE RE: AllTO CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA (HEISE PCD SIGN PROGRAM) MSPM 98-002 - MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 1ST REVIEW We have reviewed the subject plans and offer the following comments that shall be addressed prior to the project being forwarded for Board revicw: Buildinl! Division (Site Soecific Comments) - Michael E. Haag (561) 375-6350 I, Note number 4 identified on the submitted survey indicates easements were not shown, Therefore, to ensure the proposed site signs do not encroach an easement, modify the survey to include the easements of record along the right-of-way frontage of the project. 2, The site plan submittal requires that a site plan be included with your submittal. Your submittal did not include a site plan, Therefore, to properly review the requested signage with respect to its impact on adjacent projects and the visibility of the signage from adjacent rights-of-way, submit a site plan that includes the adjacent rights-of-way and identifies the use of the adjacent projects. 1 nelude on the site plan a note or symbol that relates the location of the wall sign age areas that are shown on the elevation view drawings to the buildings shown on the site plan, 3 On the sheet entitled Sign Program identify the color name, color-code and manufacturer of the colors proposed for the pole and sign frame, 4 On the drawing that depicts the Good Yearl Gold Coast Tire sign show the symbol that represents the designated sign area, Enl!ineeriIlI! Division (Site Soecific Comments) - Sebastian Puda & Ken Hall 561,375-6280 No Comments MHJSP/KHck Xc Bulent Kastarlak Don Johnson Sebastian Puda Ken Hall (-'"<.tvl" I)m:umcnts\i\uhl Car~ Ccnh;rs of ..\1l1.::ricil. r-.lajor Site Plan \Iod.. lsl R.::\'i.::w.do.:: 8-18-1998 8,35M; FROM LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE 561 495 9694 P,l ~'" eo'rllolSu~ c. Ste.nley W&wef KtrlTlII 0.11 John l. Witwortl'l III s.e~al)'IMfttl~ W.llam G. Winte,. As.i8lant~r Aon-'d L.. Crone -., Pffry & Schone, PA LAI<E WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT 13081 MIL.ITARV TRAil OElR" Y BEACH, FLORIDA 33484 August 18,1998 Trambri J, Heyden, AICP Director Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Auto Care Centers of America Southeast corner of Woolbright Road and Congress A venue Technical Review Committee Agenda- August 18, 1998 Dear Ms, Heyden: This project is located within the Lake WoTlh Drainage District's boundary and will require permit(s) from the District prior to construction, Should this project require a plat, then the District will withhold permit approval until a review of the plat has been completed to ensure that the District's right-of-way concerns have been addressed. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review and comment on this project, Should you have any questions or concerns please contact me. Respectfully, LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~~~~ Lisa A. Rowland Right-of- Technician :Iar DGlray B.ach & Boca Ralon (661) 4;8.5383. Boynton _ & W.... Polm B_~ (661) 7.7'~ . Fax (sel) 4_~4 ~'88 In) ~ @ ~ ~ w ~llli\\ 1.\\\1\ m;_I~~ j:J\ ! PLi' ,}j..-J\ zr'."'....\~ ..~~:..-',;,:_:... ..",~' Board of Supervisors C. Stanley Weaver Kermit Dell John I. Witworth III Secretary/Manager William G. Winters Assistant Manager Ronald L. Crone Attorney Perry & Schone, P.A. LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT 13081 MILITARY TRAIL DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33484 August 18,1998 Trarnbri J. Heyden, AICP Director Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Auto Care Centers of America Southeast corner of Woolbright Road and Congress A venue Technical Review Committee Agenda- August 18, 1998 Dear Ms, Heyden: This project is located within the Lake Worth Drainage District's boundary and will require permit(s) from the District prior to construction. Should this project require a plat, then the District will withhold permit approval until a review of the plat has been completed to ensure that the District's right-of-way concerns have been addressed, Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Should you have any questions or concerns please contact me, Respectfully, LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT d~~~ Lisa A, Rowland Right-of- Technician :lar Delray Beach & Boca Raton (561) 498,5363. Boynton Beach & West Palm Beach (561) 737,3835 . Fax (561) 495,9694 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. DD 98-275 ill R (,:1 1< n WI ~ ill o h,~ 15 U U .2'. DATE Michael Rumpf, Acting Planning and Zoning Administrator ~ Michael E, Haag, Building Code Permit AdministratOf"'t August 21, 1998 TO FROM RE AUTO CARE CENTER OF AMERICA (HEISE PCD SIGN PROGRAM) MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION (MSPM 98-002) 2ND REVIEW COMMENTS We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the permit drawings: Buildinl! Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) ] , A note on the submitted survey indicates easements were not shown, Therefore, to ensure the proposed site signs are not in an easement, the building permits submitted for the site signs shall include a current survey The survey shall identify and show the easements of record located along the right-of-way frontage of the project or the survey shall include a note indicating no easements are located within the vicinity of each site sign, Structures are not allowed to be located within an easement. 2, If there are additional staff, Board or Commission comments generated for the sign program request they shall be corrected and incorporated into a new submittal The submittal of the amended sign program shall be approved by staff prior to the issuance of a permanent sign permit for the project. MEH/ck Xc. Bulent Kastarlak Don Johnson c '~Iv J)oC\lmcl1l.~'Auto Care Celller !>'I".inr Sih.' Plan !\Iod. 2nd Rc\'icw.OOl.: DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 98-208 TO: Bulent Kastarlak, Director of Development Steve Gale, Fire Marshal Michael Haag, Building Code Permit Administrator Ken Hall, Engineering Division Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department Otc, Robert Riggle, Police Department Larry Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Ray Davidson, Engineering Division '/Vc,~ Michael W. Rumpf Acting Director of Planning & Zoning FROM: DATE: July 9,1998 RE: MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION REVIEW PROCEDURES 1 ST Review - Major Site Plan Modification Project - Auto Care Center of America (Heise PCD) Location - Southeast corner of Congress Avenue and Woolbright Road Agent - Annette Stauffer, Sign Craft File No, - MSPM 98-002 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments to the Director of Planning and Zoning no later than 5:00 P.M. on Julv 24. 1998. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to effiCiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1, Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments, 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Dan DeCarlo, Page 2 Auto Care Centers of America TO: TRC Members RE: Development Department Memo No. PZ 98-208 3, Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents, 4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements, 5, When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified, 6, If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director, The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process, All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum, Dan DeCarlo will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC) members, The applicant will contact TRC member(s) to clarify comments, Amended sets of plans will be submitted prior to, or brought to the TRC meeting. Amended plans and outstanding comments will be reviewed at the TRC meeting to confirm that the project is ready to move forward to the Planning and Development Board meeting, MWR:bme Attachment XC: (Memo Only) William Bingham, Fire Chief Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Don Johnson, Building Division Sebastian Puda, Engineering Division Central File s:\forms\Auto Care Centers\MSPM\1streview-p1ans