REVIEW COMMENTS
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 9, 1999
the entire property. Motion seconded by Mr. Friedland. Motion carried 6-0 (Ms. Frazier
abstaining)
2.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Foster Farm PUD (fka Foster Mill)
Julian Bryan
Julian Bryan and Associates
Continental Homes of Florida
North side of Miner Road, one-half mile
west of Congress Avenue
Request to amend the approved master
plan to increase building height from 25
feet to 30 feet, and to add plan details such
as privacy fence, private recreation and
entry wall/signage locations.
Description:
Julian Bryan, took the podium on behalf of the Applicant. Chairman Wische noted
there were 13 staff comments and asked if the agent wished to address or clarify any
comment. Mr. Bryan said they have reviewed the comments and have no problem with
the comments and will abide by all the comments,
Chairman stated this is a public hearing and asked if anyone in the audience wished to
address this issue, Hearing none, closed the public hearing,
Chairman Wische asked if staff had any comments. Mr. Rumpf had no comment.
Mr. Rosenstock asked what the average price of the homes would be, Mr, Bryan said
the average price would be approximately $150,000, base price and the range is
$120,000 to $170,000, not including oversized lots. Mr, Bryan said there were nine
models being offered in the community of which four are two-story homes and Mr,
Bryan noted that this request is not a variance and should be considered a use by
right. Mr, Bryan said he should have put 30' in the application originally and was used
to having height construction being interpreted as the mid point between the fascia and
the ridgeline, as with the County,
Ms. Frazier asked to view the pictures of the models. Ms. Frazier stated the homes
were very nice.
Motion
Mr, Friedland moved to approve the request to amend the approved master plan to
increase building height from 25 feet to 30 feet and to add plan details such as privacy
fence, private recreation and entry wall/signage locations, on the north side of Miner
26
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 9,1999
Road, one-half mile west of Congress Avenue. subject to all staff comments, Motion
seconded by Mr. Myott. Motion carried 7-0.
C. SITE PLANS
New Site Plan
1.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Foster Farm PUD (fka Foster Mill)
Julian Bryan
Julian Bryan and Associates
Continental Homes of Florida
North side of Miner Road, one-half mile
west of Congress Avenue
Request for site plan approval for
landscaping, perimeter buffer, common
areas and signage.
Description:
Chairman Wische requested that Mr. Bryan remain at the podium and noted there were
13 staff comments on this item. Mr. Bryan said they agreed with all staff comments
Chairman Wische stated this was a public hearing and asked if anyone in the audience
wished to address this issue, There were none and Chairman Wische closed the
public hearing.
Motion
Mr. Sherman moved to approve the request for site plan approval for landscaping,
perimeter buffer, common areas and signage for Foster Farm PUD on the north side of
Miner Road. one-half mile west of Congress Avenue, subject to all staff comments,
Motion seconded by Mr. Myatt. Motion carried 7-0.
Maior Site Plan Modification
2.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Guardian Storage - signage approval
Mark Gregory
Carl Touhey
3450 S. Congress Avenue
Request for approval for site and building
signage.
27
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 9,1999
Mr. Mark Gregory, 3000 Jasmine Terrace, Delray Beach, took the podium. Chairman
Wische noted there were three staff comments and asked the applicant if he wished to
address any comment. Mr. Gregory said that they accept all three comments, but
would like a clarification on regarding "site signs" and "pylon signs",
Mr, Rumpf stated site sign is the free standing sign or the property sign,
Mr. Rosenstock inquired as to the location of the building and the agent stated it was on
South Congress across the street from station WXEL. Mr. Rosenstock asked about the
landscaping and Mr. Rumpf stated it met minimum code, Mr, Rosenstock said he could
not vote for this issue unless he knew the landscaping plans. Mr. Rosenstock said that
the City has just spent $30,000 to landscape the medians. Mr. Gregory referred
members to the landscape detail that was provided by the landscape architect. Mr.
Rosenstock said there were only seven trees in front of a building.
Mr. Rumpf said that site plan approval is not on the agenda tonight. Mr. Rumpf said
that the site plan and landscaping had been approved, The only condition of approval
was that the signage be brought back to this Board. Mr. Rosenstock requested that the
landscaping be made more dense. Mr. Gregory stated that the landscaping had already
been approved and that he had no authorization to change the landscaping. Mr.
Gregory stated he was present tonight for the wall sign on the building and a
freestanding sign, The owner anticipates opening in about thirty days,
Mr, Gregory asked Mr. Rumpf to confirm that the Board had approved the project and
Mr. Rumpf said it has gone through the site plan approval process.
Ms. Frazier asked how many colors were in the sign and Mr. Gregory said there were
three colors in the sign, Mr, Gregory stated that the metal structure of the sign will
match the building color, a white background with red lettering to match neighboring
signs. A copy of the sign was included in Members' packets. Mr, Gregory stated the size
of the sign was reduced by 35% overall. Mr. Rumpf stated that the maximum allowable
signage would be 64 square feet. Mr. Gregory stated that the sign would not be any
taller than the height of the building.
Mr. Myott noted that it was really a modified pole sign and does not fall in with the type
of signage that this Board has pushed for in the past and stated the sign is "cheap" and
does not relate to the architecture of the building, Mr. Gregory said that applicant wants
to open in thirty days and needs a sign.
Mr. Rumpf stated that sometimes it is easier to incorporate some of the details on the
building into the sign, Mr. Rumpf suggested that some of the design of the building be
inserted in the sign and the colors of the building. Mr. Gregory stated he could revise
28
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 9, 1999
the sign and presented the type of format he thought the Board was looking for. The
proposed revisions were reviewed and Mr. Myatt asked Mr. Rumpf if he could review
the changes with the applicant.
Mr. Friedland asked about the signage program that the City was looking into and Mr.
Rumpf said at the moment there has not been much done on the program because of
staff shortages due to the absence of Mr. Kastarlak who was in charge of the program.
Motion
Mr. Myatt moved to approve the request for approval for site and building signage for
Guardian Storage based on all staff comments and that the sign company meet with Mr.
Mike Rumpf and integrate architectural details currently contained within the project into
the sign. Ms. Frazier seconded the motion.
Motion carried 5-2 (Mr. Rosenstock and Vice Chair Reed dissented)
Attorney Cirullo noted for clarification of the record that there were three cases where
the applicant prior to appearing tonight requested postponements and requested that a
general motion be made regarding the postponements.
Motion
Mr. Rosenstock moved that in accordance with the request by the multiple applicants
asking for postponements, that this Board grant those postponements. Vice Chair Reed
seconded the motion. Motion carried 7-0.
8. OTHER
None
9. COMMENTS BY MEMBERS
None
10. ADOURNEMNT
29
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 9,1999
The meeting properly adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
I -
, . ~ . t '
,.
), ." '.' '-I,.
Barbara M. Madden
Recording Secretary
(4 tapes)
30
I st REVIEW COMMENTS
fVlO--5' fa<
~/2 /'11
db!'c.<-+ If'.i.c~
Project name: Foster Farm PUD
File number: NWSP 99-001
Reference: The plans consist of 11 sheets identified as I st Review. New Site Plan. File #NWSP 99-00 I with a
Januarv 12. 1999 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS /
Comments: ~ <)~/>'?C Co-ryy tn.-~-1'1"'<4 ~~~T
UTILITIES
Comments:
1. The final landscaping plan shows canopy trees within utilities easements
throughtout the site, especially in the front easement crossing each
property. These canopy trees, labeled "street trees" will directly conflict
with fire hydrants, water and sewer services, and will also likely conflict
with other utilities (electric, phone, and cable TV). Canopy trees may be
planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not
impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future, LDR
Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that
interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public
rightsOof-way. This plan, however, is in direct conflict with our
development order comments, and should not be approved.
FIRE
Comments:
2. No planting other than sod will be placed within 5 feet of a hydrant. Ch.
9, Sec. 29, The entry gate will provide emergency access as determined
by the Fire Marshal.
POLICE
Comments:
3. ' "
'"
.'
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
/ Two sets of sealed paving and drainage plans shall be submitted for the
parking lot permit.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
5. At time of permit review, submit a survey of the portion of the land
where the site signs are proposed to be located.
Page 2
File Name: Fosters Mill
File No.: NWSP 99-001
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
6. At time of permit review, submit a site plan showing the location of both
site signs with respect to adjacent property/tract lines and right-of-way,
Add to the plan the location of both signs by dimensioning their location
from adjacent property lines. Note the minimum sign setback dimension
shall be shown as ten feet.
7, It is recommended that all drawings of the sales trailer and model homes
that are illustrated on the submitted drawings be removed. The sales
trailer and model homes are currently being reviewed for permits or have
been permitted through the Building Division. Removing them from the
site plan submittal will eliminate confusion and inconsistency between
the improvements that are shown on the site plan and permit drawings.
8. Permits will be required for the following improvements that are
illustrated on the subm itted plans: irrigation, landscaping, tot lot
improvements, site wall and signage,
9, Place a note on the drawing of the site signage indicating that the signs
are not illuminated,
10. Place a note on the drawing of the tot lot indicating that there are no
signs located at the tot lot.
11. Where applicable, show the setback line of the tot lot on the site plan.
12. At time of permit review, add to the site plan of the tot lot the dimension
from the north, south and west property line to the leading edge of the tot
lot plan equipment.
13. At time of permit review, dimension the width of the sidewalk. Also
indicate type of material and other construction specifications.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVlRONMENTALIST
Comments:
14.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
~;... ""'c=r- '^"" ~d.'-<,l.! -rn...t'
15. Re.i~e note"li3 on sheet L-9, and #2 on sheet L-lO, in the General Notes
and Planting Specifications to read 100% coverage with 50% overlap.
Page 3
File Name: Fosters Mill
File No.: NWSP 99-001
DEPARTMENTS
Also state from which source the system will be supplied. ChA Sec,7
Par.C,3
INCLUDE REJECT
Revise sign face graphics so that all non-word depictions are limited to
20% of the sign face area. Ch.9 Sec,lO Par.IA
eil~' 1M~c~ fr-. 0Y1 1> fa-~ r- (,-st.... .,tft'1..r :.1t:<=.- nd,'vc 5 pa..;,.,S
ppr..c:/-'-L~'_'-l~
fa
c--;.,f/Y"l"1 c--rl;<>rn.~-
,,~.
c.-v /-rt (ccl..' ~
v
'~ ,,---'
'~J-~ C-n'-"~' ~
.5"<0 "7c
?"? t" h,.... ;":r.;>c.--
r>r
o
rn~rnowrn
~
Morales, Lisa
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Ellanson, Beverly
Borden, Bob
Fosters Mill MPMD 99-001 & NWSP 99-001
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
No planting other than sod will be placed within 5' of a hydrant. Ch. 9, Sec, 29. The entry gate will provide emergency
access as determined by the Fire Marshal. We recommend these plans move forward,
DIG Gale
Fire Rescue Dept.
ml U !. l~t; i.~
U~ l\ .IAP")~
J1 I
i'\/I:,:::;jG ,\ND
lONi.,iG OE?T.
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
ENG 99-011
oo~
rn 0 \VJ ~
001
.M25&9
PlANNING AND
NING DEPT.
FROM:
Michael W. Rumpf, Acting Planning & Zoning Manager
Raymond F. Davidson, P.E., Acting City Engi~
January 21, 1999
TO:
DATE:
RE:
FOSTER MILL - MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION (MPMD 99-001)
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
We have reviewed the subject plans and offer the following comments that shall be addressed prior to the
project being forwarded for Board review.
1. Change the name "FOSTER FARM P.U.D." to FOSTERS MILL A P.U.D. [LDR Chapter 5,
Article V, Section I.C.]
2. Add the street names to the plan. [LDR Chapter 5, Article V, Section I.C.]
3. Update the "Site Data" and "Development Team Data" to reflect current information.
4. Reflect the "Cut Comers" as shown on the plat document at the intersections of the two cul-de-sacs
with the main road. [LDR Chapter 5, Article V, Section I.C.]
RD:KH/ck
Xc: Ken Hall
Sebastian Puda
C:\My Documents\Foster Mill Master Plan Modification 1st Review.doc
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO, 99 - 040
'00
~@~~wrn
FEB I.
rn
TO:
Mike Rumpf, Planning Director
PLANNING AND
Z NING DEPT.
FROM:
John A, Guidry, Utilities Director
DATE:
Pebruary 1, 1999
SUBJECT:
Poster's Mill- Pinal Landscaping plans
We offer the following comments on this project:
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
1) The final landscaping plan shows canopy trees within utilities easements throughout the site,
especially in the front easement crossing each property. These canopy trees, labeled "street trees"
will directly conflict with fire hydrants, water and sewer services, and will also likely conflict with
other utilities (electric, phone, and cable TV). Canopy trees may be planted outside of the
easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the
foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7,5-18,1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that
interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way, This plan,
however, is in direct conflict with our development order comments, and should not be approved.
Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (742-6404) of this office,
JAG/PVM
xc: Skip Milor
Peter Mazzella
Pile
rnl ~mmDwm rn
! '~
lul 11.
Ii U FEB
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPT.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #99-019
SUBJ:
Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning & Zoning ~ir~'/fr
C. Larry Roberts, Public Works Direc~to: ~C)JV
Al Kim, Sanitation Superintendent '
New Site Plan - Fosters Mill- 1st Revi
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
January 28, 1999
The Public Works Department has no comments at this time in reference to the New Site
Plan listed above.
AKlcr
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. BD 99-028
rn lli @ lli n WI lli rn
FEB .-
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
TO:
Michael Rumpf, Acting Planning and Zoning Administrator ~
Michael E. Haag, Building Code Permit Administrator1~
January 28,1999 U
Fosters MiIl- New Site Plan (NWSP 99-001) 1 st review comments
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board
review with the understanding that the following comments will be shown in compliance on the
working drawings submitted for permits.
Buildinl! Division (Site SDecific and Permit Comments) Michael E. Haag (561) 742-6352
1. At time of permit review, submit a survey of the portion of the land where the site signs are
proposed to be located.
2. At time of permit review, submit a site plan showing the location of both site signs with
respect to adjacent property/tract lines and right-of-way. Add to the plan the location of both
signs by dimensioning their location from adjacent property lines. Note the minimum sign
setback dimension shall be shown as ten feet.
3, It is recommended that all drawings ofthe sales trailer and model homes that are illustrated
on the submitted drawings be removed. The sales trailer and model homes are currently
being reviewed for permits or have been permitted through the Building Division. Removing
them from the site plan submittal will eliminate confusion and inconsistency between the
improvements that are shown on the site plan and permit drawings,
4. Permits will be required for the following improvements that are illustrated on the submitted
plans: irrigation, landscaping, tot lot improvements, site wall and signage.
5, Place a note on the drawing of the site signage indicating that the signs are not illuminated.
6. Place a note on the drawing of the tot lot indicating that there are no signs located at the tot
lot.
7, Where applicable, show the setback line ofthe tot lot on the site plan.
8. At time of permit review, add to the site plan of the tot lot the dimension from the north,
south and west property line to the leading edge of the tot lot play equipment.
9. At time of permit review, dimension the width of the sidewalk, Also indicate type of
material and other construction specifications.
MEH:bg
\\CH\MAIN\SHRDA TA \Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 99-001 1st review Fosters Mill.doc
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO, PZ 99-014
TO: Technical Review Committee
Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Ofc. Robert Riggle, Police Department
Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department
Michael Haag, Building Division
Ken Hall, Engineering Division
AI Kim, Public Works
John Wildner, Parks Division
Ray Davidson, Acting City Engineer
Bob Donovan, Supervisor, Permit Application Group
FROM: Michael W. Rumpf
Acting Planning and Zoning Manager
DATE: January 20, 1999
SUBJECT: Fosters Mill
MPMD 99-001 and NWSP 99-001
Please review proposed changes to the approved master plan for Fosters Mill. The
proposed revisions primarily involve the increase in building height from 25 feet to 30 feet.
The applicant has also used this opportunity to add necessary details to the master plan
such as privacy fence along a portion of the west property line, the tot lot location, entry
wall/signage locations, and the site of the temporary sales trailer and parking lot. Please
forward comments to Beverly Ellanson by 1/29/99. Due to the simplicity of this request, I
only anticipate the need for one staff review.
The site plan request is for landscaping, buffer, common areas, and signage. Please review
and again forward comments to Beverly Ellanson by 1/29/99.
MWR:bme
Attachments
s:\projectsIFoster ProperlylTRC Review MPMD 99-001
~VElOPMENTDEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 99-014
FROM:
Technical Review Committee
Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Ofc. Robert Riggle, Police Department
Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department
Michael Haag, Building Division
Ken Hall, Engineering Division
AI Kim, Public Works
John \"!i!dnert Parks Division
Ray Davidson, Acting City Engineer
Bob Donovan, Supervisor, Permit Application Group
016-fZ-.
Michael W. Rumpf
Acting Planning and Zoning Manager
TO:
DATE:
January 20, 1999
SUBJECT:
Fosters Mill
MPMD 99-001 and NWSP 99-001
Please review proposed changes to the approved master plan for Fosters Mill. The
proposed revisions primarily involve the increase in building height from 25 feet to 30 feet.
The applicant has also used this opportunity to add necessary details to the master plan
such as privacy fence along a portion of the west property line, the tot lot location, entry
wall/signage locations, and the site of the temporary sales trailer and parking lot. Please
forward comments to Beverly Ellanson by 1/29/99. Due to the simplicity of this request, I
only anticipate the need for one staff review.
The site plan request is for landscaping, buffer, common areas, and signage, Please review
and again forward comments to Beverly Ellanson by 1/29/99.
MWRbme
Attachments
s:\projectsIFoster PropertylTRC Review MPMD 99-001
____~_______~_~_.___m_ ..
"EPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 99-030
SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
February 9, 1999
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Project Name: Foster Farm PUD
Property Owner:
Applicant/Agent:
Location:
File No.:
Land Use:
Zoning:
Type of Use:
Units:
Area:
Surrounding
Uses and Zoning:
Existing Site
Characteristics:
Proposal:
Landscaping:
Continental Homes of Florida
Julian Bryan / Julian Bryan and Associates
North side of Minor Road, 1400 feet east of the intersection of
Minor Road and Lawrence Road (see Exhibit "A" - location map).
NWSP 99-001
Low Density Residential
Planned Unit Development - (PUD)
Residential Single Family
98
Site Area: 1,020,035 square feet (23.4 acre)
Typical unit square feet: 1,600 square feet
North - Meadows Park, zoned PUD
South - CanallWDD L-20, Minor Road, farther south Citrus Glen, zoned
PUD
East - Meadows Park, zoned PUD
West - Lawrence Grove, zoned PUD & Whispering Pines Mobil Home
Park, in Palm Beach County
The Foster Farm PUD Master Plan was approved on July 21,1998, as a 98
unit single-family, 23.4 acre Planned Unit Development. Site plan approval
is not required for conventional single-family detached homes, but is required
for landscaping, signage, and common areas.
The applicant is requesting site plan approval for the final design of entry
signage, a new 6' wood fence added to the west property line where exotic
trees were required to be removed, the introduction of a tot lot into an open
passive park area, and a temporary sales trailer and related parking placed
on lots 97 and 98. (see Exhibit "8" - proposed Landscape Plan),
A set of landscape plans have been submitted and reviewed. The plan
provides the appropriate plantings required of all areas in the PUD,
Landscape regulations will be fully met when staff comments are
incorporated into the permit drawings. As a compromise with the applicant,
/
Foster Farm PUD - NWSP 99-001
Memorandum No, PZ 99-030
Page 2
staff will allow palm trees within the easements paralleling the street, where
the applicant proposes shade trees, '
Signage:
A proposed sign plan with details for the PUD entry was submitted as part of
this site plan review, The proposed entry signs have been designed in
accordance with the Community Design Plan for residential developments.
The proposed entry sign locations shall be redesigned to be consistent with
setback regulations set forth in section 21 of the LDR. Sign plans or details
were not submitted for any other internal areas which usually utilize signage.
Such areas may include the Tot Lot or Sales Trailer. Plans for all proposed
secondary signs shall be submitted at time of permit review.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Division recommends that this request for site plan approval be
approved, subject to the comments included in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Staff also
recommends that the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans
submitted for building permit.
xc: Central File
J:ISHROATAIPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIFosler Farm PUOINWSP 99-001151te plan staff report Foster,doc
.A
LCSATION MAn EXHIBIT A
FOSTER FARM P.U.D.
\ . -'::
~, ..~_":J~ ,-" 'il \ ' Pl.JC NIC :\ L III
~ ' "r-'IlJ.ii'" :"", " i ' LUU i iiW, ,
" I: "'"I''' " n .~.o .}. ~';7 '
,~ I ~ ~ ",liJii "p\jc 1 W ~;S~;!~ [
,':: l ~,,~ ~;:: ~.dll,~lJ u# :~i=1 '1:3\,~_r
.-= i I~ __;::: ~ ;::: ~~ ,1_,' f::l~~':" '~->'\)t:i I
,'::: -l~, ',,::1 ,-/ ~ (\""/). :: ; f- ~ '-' ~:','" . L II,~ :
IC . f..... rrr:; C11, -l r I,), r:::J.'.2::I; ~,' .1 !~ ~'.
: . / Ill!' IfI!lIf1IlI,li \\)1 -J --"., TTTTIIl\ I I~-
;,.-,.. ..L- J IU!'" '
_ = L:: /ilL! : ...........,..._<"~ 'LOf/ I ~
\ ,'I - ~ } (I, -,
~ t' J- - ~ "I A ,,;:,'.i ,..-:==:..",.,... 6t
II 'T rrm T. --' " . 0" ' B..
,'-. ---I: ' 1 ~ ~ <~-~I~;
_ -~~ 1:.,~ '1 I ,., :.:= ,:;;;; \ ~
3 :Lm i wJ~ J~- _r"' ~ ~
~';"fu' II-r:-:\' - '_ ,-1" m T \ \ i ....._lnlll~1 ~l"
,,\ f1lbl-', C - .'1'111 T -1I1--rrrnrlll: r:: . ,
I I II ,'" I __ " ' T
:; rrlll~0~ 1\1: ~.._ '~..,.",...... . .. .~~, .. L L-,z:: \ 1\ I
;~~~ ,,~g~Qf{\,~'~
- ~'~3,~':_;~"Q.~.<1"''<~ .-.'- ...~!~~,~, ~ '
~,---,: ',.,...-jc--', '~L'>;,.<'~~""'\ .L,-...\ ::":Im~ p" .... ~' ,'I-.}' ~
I~ \ \ , ;';'.2'. ~,II!!<<'. f':l. Ei == I n; i= ~ ' '-' I ~ / l'~
::,,.~' "._'. :"""~' .. I '" ~ ~ LUl.. ~_"1l,_!r": -'. -
1. /8 LltLE'S' .. '~~":..i: ~ ~I ~::: ~,-=ia:.S Y-/'
IV 1\.1 _ ;= ..... "MEL~~Z_~~~TY-
\ \ \ \ I \ 4.0 l ~ ~ ':0/
400 800 FEET ~ ~ 1
... _", P/..ANNI,"G JJEPr.a2/9'11 ,..,II I "01f'f1"'\ ::! ~,
_.__._.~_.._~
'_"HI __'V;I".~~::+-
a ~ I _._._~:-:~..;;::"~ .j_._.~~N~_.____._ --in -T-'~~=~'-'-'-'-'~'"
"Jf"'--' I!" II 'J'_Lrn--- =~~.;.: 4-. I]!.-..
a ~ Ii, ItfL______JR__j..:.:-....-!.::-.:. .~- i: .'
i ~::~s;;:::..:;::=-;;;'---_.---.--.-.--...--.. .a"a"At"'1' ~~,
._U"-:' ,- illf 7YNY:) otoJ'f I - +-- r-r- ~
#1 ~,~ . :!J<
~ l\ .. -.-- ~......_..-. _~ __ _~
'n '" ""'h 'J.~
" II'": ~%~~ -~~~-'1(~i~) IllY' ~'!!rnl
If, :~ .e~~/ ! ..:::__ \ \ ~"'~ ~
L-I , ",.:~, .~ '
I;:' t!S 7:f i:: t 11JrL \ i t -r :"='
! ~ . ifA-'- lA'" I ~ I j ,rJrN ;
: '-', , ~ I '!ti"'1f j ,......, i:
1 ('i,rrl_~'-c lJi I -- ! I mw~ !
(' i I ~~ r--...,j/~,~ W~SI'": I '~ i
. : I,~-",U t t{~ ~ ,'< i~llf"'l ; ,......--, f
i , ~l G )l. ! rrrlll~ &
'h ! I 111"'1' "0 I : :
i !" ~' 1 -"'.---'= II' II~I ~llmH 1 H-r",;q ii
- llr l ; l rni-d ~I _ 11.. IJ l I~
1 il~' '. '\ \~' ~~~{):- rrlllml~ ! I~ ",-j I
. I ,\ ~o "I. jI I ___
'I" ! !. ~117~\ ,~ f'll .:~~:. Ji lilt ",oj I
III i ~~"'~ ~~'.-k! "'- _ 1~1tfm.:,
It!~ ! 4p;'\\\\\ ~ ~:;-~-~--::;.--i ~~~ i
~'i l/ 17' t ~I~, ~~~ V I fH ",:q
~ , I z "'-- ,pLlf-'W -"-I i' FH ",~h ,
il r--.. )0 L~ '. I"""'":'J . I
'-.--". II ~ .. ii rr!: mill .Fl';:; c~
l ir~ _! ~ I * I I .;~
) It.:- '~ .~!; f fa"", 'I' ~ I ~ c'
" · 'I 1m 'K! -"'-"':-:...-:-' <T~
::;, Ii ~-=mJ!i'rtl~'~~g
.~~lllil "v::: r;!.. It"" ~:~ ;. ~~
~ . I ~- crj, RJ~ '" - 3 i r :1iim ! q
~ . ~ ,,' ~~\ t~l~V! F ~ 1'1, i : I E I I : m. ~
~ Iii r 'n ~, ~ ~~--~~--=~::~~=-- ::;~ '~, I
!' ~ i i \.<~' ,',. - 't1 "'~
"L~ I ~b~'~!I'I~,~ ~~~~! : ~
i f.i.- '- -.....z.'<,J --- --1... '.-~"I' . d '''~
:ise:i ~ .............p i .......~ l~! i~
g, '80 .~: rn . CI l po ! 11 iJI~~
r~ I! r ii i!t" (]j.'I~..: I i~I( !1:'PWnlifP'jllllU
g ~; I, I. ~'l '" ":,.;0-,' p:;:;.n 111,I"ll,n ll~ 111lpn
.i ~~. I: I. , , I "'~~ I g'l II . -If Z
.,..--.: &~r:- ~./_~! : -;f,~~ r--c,;~I~I., ,: .~. l '!"j i
.: "~~ 1m -'Jf ~... Mm~~ ;~:~lll W l
'II: (t ':'~ ~ - ~ '~U\l\:\ e", ,::.,'~ >o'J -ii:c1 lrfi -~~ i ~~ 'I ,1.'& I
I'.t " " ;; '\ ~ /<, ~TIl "'~~ ili; ':l..~' 'r"
,;. Z r . ~ fll , '- - - VJtj..,~-'i r ' ,
',: I 'oJ ,"-' , . .~" In i I
'I 'f'; ~,'"\ ~ L._' _ - ~f'- -~S,,/~ I' ~ I-g . .",' !!II
i'! .- 17: - _ - :i"l - ,''''' r----- .Iil;~'~ __u
... n" Zf~l;: s ~,~t ~~ ~! i '~" iiw'WJ~l- .i 'd~'"'~ ~ ..::. ,
~iL>.-,.~;:~..~ q~t~....~ .~~~::;-~~ ,HwHH~~~.:~J.;~':'~;~~il.g{ f; P!\rJ11! i" <:{ \~
"ij _ __ , - _no _ . _ .------.----:l.t'tn .,..".l:lol'll5rn '-___ _ Igrl ;oj t:~ .. .- _ 4':' ..:tl
JIA1 -.:=.--in-------::-.:.Jlll ~:c=:I~:~;S=~.::.;~;:"::;~::.': !'" 211 -, ,:;::-:::: - r i
Julian Bryan & Associates u_n d_la" ..M ~.nn'"Q ...aonlng Pro~MV .nelyat. m.",., f8..lbl1lry g_",,".n... processing
~.
,
~
~:
~,
t:l~,
~l"-oL._._._+
~~
"'0
C
C
o
o
.
z
m
.
uno l..ol Una Hom__ ~ ea.
~D ""-
1
~"-"""'J:
II
1"'mi!"ili!Ji,li,,,',iiiid
J 1"., ',rr 'lie
illilJlmlllllltlil',1
WI! 'f'!1 nIJII~IJ
mill I fp'II'!
"n II i 1111il,I
I Iii 1\1' Ii i
i II "I -
pi I
- II _
1llllj!jmUi
Iii H~ ii{q
!....'I II V I
il))I' '1 i====
UiN' (,
1111, J f
i II P
EXHIBIT E
(CltnlaOlen)
=3!il: "'i~~ f/:;!$ilj;
~I, ;.~ --Will
s~:. ;~ ell' 0
~~u~ 10m hi'"
;~~i F~ ,rij
t r~UJ' d tU~
~ I ! ~ ~rl ~
'" I i: 'f' z
Q i " [U
I~ ..-.. f lfl ~
mn i :ii-
......,... I Ic:i
ilE;U ~ IJI
Ill!~ Iii
,;uiia .--....
!'>;lIEil ... !:lS~iH~~
lI'..!:!: i~ ~~-Il:i:SCl
1ili!1&~ ~5Ii"" ~
IiI ~J ~~!.ill~
tag ~I I:f"!
1515" . ~
I......--".I"~
llli:;:a.";E:;::'" _~..
III ..:1 ~n
.. Ilh fn
;1 lll~ hi
if IJ!i lIt
. Us - .
: I,,}
. (t' J~
-j fa
_ JOt'
Ii
~:lFS:iO""'." ....... ell
..j:~iil;::t:::li iill!2-
Sa-l:!:i!!ii!5 jl!:j!::;;:I
:.is =;:=;-", i~i~
E! ''If;I:::~6 6 ;;: t;
"':., 5>< a;; m
~ ..:: .. III ::a
= .. .. g!'
.
c
o
~
i
f
.
I
(
I
l~!""!'OloO"'''!,"-~..,..a:
<"iH!"mi;:jl:
..... ''''ill~
11------- .
-.-j;--!"!":r- .
., :::..;:;;;;.~ .f;
j ~.z:;.!:___~~ l=~
- .~-
- r
~ I~
. ,I
3
~"I""1 . ~
i!!' 'I'. I ~
" .d' I ~
~'!! ,~
MASTER PLAN
FOSTER FARM P.U.D,
CONTINENTAL HOMES
4
EXHIBIT "e"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Foster Farm PUD (fka Foster Mill)
File number: NWSP 99-001
Reference: The plans consist of 11 sheets identified as 1 st Review. New Site Plan, File # NWSP 99-001
with a Januarv 12. 1999 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments:
I. Waste removal in connection with construction process must be serviced
by City of Boynton Beach. Place note on dumpster detail to indicate
same.
UTILITIES
Comments:
2. The final landscaping plan shows canopy trees within utilities easements
throughout the site, especially in the front easement crossing each
property, These canopy trees, labeled "street trees" will directly conflict
with fire hydrants, water and sewer services, and will also likely conflict
with other utilities (electric, phone, and cable TV). Canopy trees may be
planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not
impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR
Sec. 7,5-18,1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that
interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public
rightsOof-way. This plan, however. is in direct conflict with our
development order comments, and should not be approved,
FIRE
Comments:
3, No planting other than sod will be placed within 5 feet of a hydrant. Ch.
9, See, 29, The entry gate will provide emergency access as determined
by the Fire Marshal.
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
6
Page 2
Foster Farm PUD (fka Foster Mill)
File No,: NWSP 99-001
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
4, At time of permit review, submit a survey of the portion of the land
where the site signs are proposed to be located.
5, At time of permit review, submit a site plan showing the location of both
site signs with respect to adjacent property/tract lines and right-of-way.
Add to the plan the location of both signs by dimensioning their location
from adjacent property lines. Note the minimum sign setback dimension
shall be shown as ten feet.
6. It is recommended that all drawings of the sales trailer and model homes
that are illustrated on the submitted drawings be removed. The sales
trailer and model homes are currently being reviewed for permits or have
been permitted through the Building Division, Removing them from the
site plan subm ittal will eliminate confusion and inconsistency between
the improvements that are shown on the site plan and permit drawings.
7. Permits will be required for the following improvements that are
ill ustrated on the submitted plans: irrigation, landscaping, tot lot
improvements, site wall and signage.
8. Place a note on the drawing of the site signage indicating that the signs
are not illuminated, or provide the necessary details for lighting,
9, Place a note on the drawing of the tot lot indicating that there are no
signs located at the tot lot.
10, Where applicable, show the setback line of the tot lot on the site plan.
11. At time of permit review, add to the site plan of the tot lot the dimension
from the north, south and west property line to the leading edge of the tot
lot plan equipment.
12. At time of permit review, dimension the width of the sidewalk. Also
indicate type of material and other construction specifications.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: None
/rJ
Page 3
Foster Farm PUD (fka Foster Mill)
File No.: NWSP 99-00 I
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
]3, It is recommended that notes #3 on sheet L-9. and #2 on sheet L-IO, in
the General Notes and Planting Specifications to read 100% coverage
with 50% overlap. Also state from which source the system will be
supplied. ChA Sec.7 Par.C.3
14. Indicate on plant list tables those native species to confirm compliance
with 50% minimum regulation.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
15, To be determined,
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
16, To be determined.
J:\SHRDAT A\Planmng\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Fosters Mill PUD\NWSP 99-001\cond. ofappr-NWSP revIsed 2-2-99.doc
/bme
1