Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning Building Planning & Zoning Engineering Occupational License Community Redevelopment February 18, 1999 Julian Bryan Julian Bryan and Associates 756 St. Albans Drive Boca Raton, FL 33486 Re: FileNo.: Location: Foster Farm PUD NWSP 99-001 North side of Minor Road, one-half mile west of Congress Avenue Dear Mr. Bryan: Enclosed is the City of Boynton Beach Development Order for new site plan approval granted on February 16, 1999. Should you have any questions regarding this matter. please feel free to contact this office at 561-742-6260, Sincerely, ~~. ---1 Michael W. Rumpf Acting Manager of Planning & Zoning MWR:jma J:\SHRPA T A\PLANNING\SHAREDlWP\PROJECTS\FOSTER FARM PUD\MPMD 99..oo1\DEVELOPMENT ORDER LETTER DOC America's Gateway to the Gulfstream 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259 DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE ,. ry OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORI PROJECT NAME: Foster Farm PUD APPLICANT'S AGENT: Julian Bryan, Julian Bryan and Associates APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 756 St. Albans Drive, Boca Raton, Florida 33486 DATE OF RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: February 16,1999 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: New Site Plan LOCATION OF PROPERTY: North side of Minor Road, one-half mile west of Congress Avenue DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO. X THIS MA TIER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows: OR THIS MA TIER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1, Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2, The Applicant LHAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the pUblic and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included". 4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby L GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other ,.111'1111< ,\\\\" "/III/, :'\\ :2)'" q r:: t I'//: ~'~'\ ........ OL_ ~ ":t .:......... . .;t.-""T:,.... .:Y ~ ~ 0 .,~o ... ~ 2 OJ fa: \ ~ = u.. :8 C) i = ::: (') '.1 Oj0/ I <( ~ - "0 .' Q ~ ~ _' ",.0..... S:- ~ '.1....... """" .00 t"J.. " ~ "'/_ ","-.0' 0'- $: ~~ v f" ~~ 1111. \\\~ ~/"",IIII\\I\\ DATED: 4)t;j'PP \;;M~'.w..~/,,/. --" City CI~r~ J\SHROATA\Planr'lIngISHAREOIINPIPROJECTS\Fosters Mill PUD\NWSP 99-OO1\Develop.Qrder-Nlf1JSP doc EXHIBIT "e" Conditions of Approval Project name: Foster Farm PUD (fka Foster Mill) File number: NWSP 99-001 Reference: The plans consist of 11 sheets identified as 1 st Review, New Site Plan, File # NWSP 99-001 with a Januarv 12. 1999 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: 1. Waste removal in connection with construction process must be serviced X by City of Boynton Beach, Place note on dumpster detail tp indicate same. UTILITIES Comments: 2, The final landscaping plan shows canopy trees within utilities easements X throughout the site, especially in the front easement crossing each property. These canopy trees, labeled "street trees" will directly conflict with fire hydrants, water and sewer services, and will also likely contlict with other utilities (electric, phone, and cable TV). Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec, 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rightsOof-way. This plan, however, is in direct contlict with our development order comments, and should not be approved. FIRE Comments: 3, No planting other than sod will be placed within 5 feet of a hydrant, Ch. X 9, Sec. 29. The entry gate will provide emergency access as determined by the Fire Marshal. POLICE Comments: None X ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: None X Page 2 Foster Farm PUD (fka Foster Mill) File No.: NWSP 99-001 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 4, At time of permit review, submit a survey of the portion of the land X where the site signs are proposed to be located. 5. At time of permit review, submit a site plan showing the location of both X site signs with respect to adjacent property/tract lines and right-of-way, Add to the plan the location of both signs by dimensioning their location from adjacent property lines. Note the minimum sign setback dimension shall be shown as ten feet. 6. It is recommended that all drawings of the sales trailer and model homes X that are illustrated on the submitted drawings be removed. The sales trailer and model homes are currently being reviewed for permits or have been permitted through the Building Division, Removing them from the site plan submittal will eliminate confusion and inconsistency between the improvements that are shown on the site plan and permit drawings. 7, Permits will be required for the following improvements that are X illustrated on the submitted plans: irrigation, landscaping, tot lot improvements, site wall and signage, 8. Place a note on the drawing of the site signage indicating that the signs X are not illuminated, or provide the necessary details for lighting. 9, Place a note on the drawing of the tot lot indicating that there are no X signs located at the tot lot. 10. Where applicable, show the setback line of the tot lot on the site plan. X It. At time of permit review, add to the site plan of the tot lot the dimension X from the north, south and west property line to the leading edge of the tot lot plan equipment. 12, At time of permit review, dimension the width of the sidewalk. Also X indicate type of material and other construction specifications. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None X FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Page 3 Foster Farm PUD (fka Foster Mill) File No.: NWSP 99-001 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comments: None X PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 13. It is recommended that notes #3 on sheet L-9, and #2 on sheet L-IO. in X the General Notes and Planting Specifications to read 100% coverage with 50% overlap. Also state from which source the system will be supplied. ChA Sec.? Par.C.3 14. Indicate on plant list tables those native species to confirm compliance X with 50% minimum regulation, ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS IS. None X ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 16. l'Q l1e aet"'lIuiucd. ~/'tI€ V 1:ISHRDATAIPlanOlngISHARED\WPlPR01ECTSIFosters MIll PUD\NWSP 99-00Ilcond. ofappr-NWSP revised 2-2-99.doc MWRlbme/dim MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPARTMENT TO: Diane Reese, Finance Director FROM: ~John A. GUid~lities Director IIV',?", If 71, I ~ 9SV frn-o r-JB. :~_JJLr(r:' I ~ SEP 11998 _ I ~l i L. "!\,. -.,~ -_.".-.,~.. DATE: SUBJECT: Reservation fee transmittal for - fw~",wJ /"l(, 10:;'/(',. /;~,,,j /!",..} Enclosed is a reservation fee for the subject project: Amount - $ / 3, j72. .f'D , Check no, - S-u 775-S---- From - C)"-;;~('4fJ? ~J .,L'~e Please deposit this fee in the appropriate account. You may refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella of this office. JAG/PVM bc: Peter Mazzella xc: Michael Rumpf, Acting Planning Director File DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 99-012 TO: Don Johnson Deputy Building Official i';:'c.-IC- FROM: Michael W. Rumpf Acting Manager of Planning and Zoning DATE: January 15, 1999 SUBJECT: Fosters Mill PUD - Request for modification to maximum building height Please be informed that a request for a Master Plan modification for the Fosters Mill PUD has been filed, and is tentatively scheduled for review in February, This request is to increase the established maximum height from 25 feet to 30 feet Although we cannot anticipate the City Commission's decision on this amendment, I can indicate that staff will likely recommend the approval of this request based on past precedence and the recognition by staff of current architecture design needs relative to value, quality and appearance. MR:bme J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\VYP\PROJECTS\Foster Property\Foster Mill PUD memo.doc To: Fax: From: Date: Pages: From the desk of... Michael Rumpf Senior Planner City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425 561-375-6260 Fax: 561-375-6259 Mr. Julean Bryan 561-338-5996 j/J?G-R. Michael Rumpf January 20, 1999 1, including cover sheet. To document my telephone converation with you regarding being short 5 sets of plans for master plan modification and site plan approval for the Foster Mill PUD, and to add to this documentation the remaining submittal dificiencies, I am faxing you this note. Your submittal fees for the requests include $500 for the master plan modification and $1,500 for the site plan application (for a project over 5 acres). Also, you need to complete and submit an application for site plan review that describes in detail the subject site plan request. The staff review process will begin once I have sufficient sets to distribute. I will need the remaining submittal requirements prior to moving the requests to the Board and Commission. If minimal comments are generated on first review, I will considering avoiding a second review and forward the project(s) to the Planning and Development Board on February 9th. However, if it is determined that the plans should be revised, additional time will be warranted to finish the review, Thank you for your response to these deficiencies.