The URL can be used to link to this page

CORRESPONDENCE f ! CITY of BOYNTON BEACH ~. -J. 120 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. P.O. BoX 310 . Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 (305) 734-8111 December 5, 1984 Treasure Coast'Regional Planning Council P. O. Box 2395 Stuart, FL 33494 Attention: Mr. Sam Shannon Executive Director Gentlemen: Pursuant to the request by Mr. Carmen Annunziato, City Planning Director, we forward herewith a certified copy of Ordinance No. 79-36 rezoning 90 acres of land as designated requested by Motorola, Inc. and adopting a Development of Regional Impact Order (DRI) in connec- tion with this rezoning. If we can be of any further service, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH #f Betty S. Boroni City Clerk BSB/sInk Enclosure cc: C. Annunziato @ MOTOROLA INC. November 9, 1983 Mr. Bud Howell, Chief Building Official City of Boynton Beach P,O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Dear Bud: The Development Order approving Motorola's Development of Regional Impact (City Ordinance 79-36) sets forth certain conditions which must be met by Motorola, I have reviewed each of the requirements, and have attached documentation of compliance as appropriate: The requirements are: 1. Discovery of archaeological artifacts during construction - None Found. 2. Establishment of program of regular parking lot vacuum sweeping - See attached letter. 3,4,5. Toxic and hazardous waste - See attached letter from DER showing that hazardous waste activities have been reviewed and approved. 6. Use of solar energy or waste heat recovery - see attached report from architects Heery & Heery. 7. Bikepath easement - Dedicated 7a. Security Fencing - Captain Hillary of the Boynton Beach Police Department will provide memo verifying that the subject has been reviewed and that security fencing is not required at the present time. -:-:-:---. Ire.",,! - _1.\ - I' /", <,-, "<. /' " {),O -, :I-~l; I- ('. <r, 'of._ "'t,'. t_, -, , , Paging Products Division 6000 W Sunrise Blvd" Ft. LauderdalE:'. Fla. 33322 . t305) 4755000 @ MOTOROLA INC. Page 2 8. Road and traffic improvement - No action required by Motorola, 9, Rights of Way - Dedicated 10. Carpooling - Written report required one year after commencement of operations. 11. Van Pooling - Written report required one year after commencement of operations. 12. Mass Transit - See attached letter to city planner confirming agreement that intent of this requirement will best be met by providing data at the point in which the occupancy of the first phase is largely completed, and the employment level has stabilized. Please let me know if you need any additional information on our compliance with these requirements, Sincerely, ~~~ Regional Director, State Relations cc: Ray Ochocki, Motorola Inc. MLL:jad(l19) Paging Products Division 8000 W Sunrise Blvd, Ft Lauderdale ;:" a. 33322 . (305) 475-5000 ~~~;\ .I......... ,\'(i"-i1,," _, ,"- \.-\ \ f-- I'J ," c :"' v \ ~: I";\CC,. ,'" 'f:?':' )~; , .. ~ ,l '"- I - -,-" ~ -;:., cr;..,," ",,'u ;:::-; v/' ,- \'.'-'" <'f ~ P.O. BOX 310 120 N.E. 2ND AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA 33435 13051734'8111 ~ ~C''''_'<"".'_..''''j "";~r.=- , , ..~, ',1,- ' - ~.... ~~ i"ell! -- _.__.'_~ _c:_,. --.-.., _ ~ ! --- .4",-.- - CITY of BOYNTON BEACH OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 30 November 1983 Ms. Mary Lou Lackey Regional Director State Relations Motorola, Inc. Paging Products Division 8000 W. Sunrise Boulevard Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33322 Dear Mary Lou: Enclosed you will find a copy of Page 5 of the proposed ordinance which amends the zoning code with respect to the set of regulations related to the M-l zoning clas- sification as requested. If after you receive this information you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Yours very truly, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH C1 "-', - Carmen S. Annunziato Director of Planning /bks Enclosure cc: Central File G>> 120 N.E. 2nd AVENUE P.O. BOX310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435-0310 (305)734-8111 CITY of BOYNTON BEACH OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR 7 November 1983 Ms. Mary Lou Lackey, Regional Director State Relations ~1otorola, Inc. Paging Products Division 8000 W. Sunrise Blvd. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33322 Dear Mary Lou: The purpose of this letter is to respond to your correspondence of October 27, 1983 in which the practical aspects of meeting Condition 12 of the Motorola Development Order were discussed. Clearly, the intent of Condition 12 is to establish viable bus routes to serve the new facility, and because of the time lag in staffing, this will not be possible until staffing is nearly complete. Your suggestion to wait until the third quarter of 1984 to submit the required in- formation, will result in a potentially more successful mass transit program, and in this regard, I find no inconsistency with the intent of Condition 12. Therefore, by copy of this letter, I will" notify the appropriate agencies who may have an interest in implementing this Condition. Yours very truly, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH c...... -J'~ Carmen S. Annunziato Director of Planning /bks cc: Executive Director, Palm Beach County Transportation Authority Executive Director, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Ci ty ~Ianager Building Official Central File @ D~h "'..... ~'-' Time MOTOROLA INC. October 27, 1983 Mr. Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Dear Carmen: One of the conditions of approval in Motorola's DRI Development Order (Ordinance 79-36) relates to coordination on mass transit. It reads: Upon commencement of Phase 1 operations, or any subsequent expansion, the Applicant shall provide the Palm Beach County Transportation Authority with information regarding the general location of its employees' residences and shall consult with the Authority regarding the feasibility of establishing or expanding routes to serve the plant, If bus service is provided to the plant, the Applicant shall provide boarding and unloading space on-site or provide space for turnout bays along Congress and Northwest 22nd Avenue, if needed. Motorola is now beginning to occupy the first phase of the project, and we are anxious to comply with all of the DRI requirements. However, we will be moving operations into the new facility continuously over the next several months, and many of the employees who are transferring from our Plantation facility have not yet moved their residences. Therefore, any data which we provided to the Transportation Authority at this time would quickly be out of date. When you and I discussed the issue, we agreed that the intent of this section would best be met by providing information at the point in which our occupancy of Phase I is largely completed, our employment level has stabalized, and most of the relocating employees have completed their moves. I would expect that this would be in the third quarter of 1984. Please let me know if this timetable for submission of data will satisfy the development order requirement. Thank you for your assistance, Mary Lou Lackey Regional Director, State Relations Paging Products Division 8000 W Sunrise Blvd., Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. 33322 . (305) 475.5000 ~--"~~~~J-W'" l _,~. c '.,' ~'" .," t' _ _ ~....:;~:r"',,~;.,.' 'J>:, . v' '- '..__.. , ' , ><-' ~~ " st. rude - 1 j , ~ ,~ I 1 '1 j o ~fr" /,,-- { I I 1 j ; ~ .~~.r:~~; ~ '..~.I..:'l""' treClure ..........- ..:. C C lC 11'1 .,.."==" '-!I." . reglQnal j Otannlna :- .: :.... _..._ .....:-.i '-;1 (r)i inCH ~~ ~~ ~~:!~ ) I April 14, 1982 J./ )/ }/ / .. "/~ ~ 1\\ ,V ,y1 I / e;f( /VJ; fX}1 . mortln 1 l 1 Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato City of Boynton Beach 120 NE 2nd Avenue Boynton Beach, FL 33345 ~"" ,.-0 Dear ~ato: P1eJse find enclosed a 1981 Oevelopm2nt of Regional Impdct (ORI) Status Report. This report is intended to update the Treasure Ccast Regional Planning Council and the State of Florida with y,"gard to the status of your project(s). In addition, your ccmments can be helpful in improving the ORI process. Please respond by May 14. / ,I The questionnaire, and your comments, will be in our 3nnudl report to the Department of Veteran and Community Affairs. Thank you for your earliest consideration of this matter. If you have any questions please contact Howard Muise of Council staff. ' , l 1 Yours truly, ~~J Sam Shann Executive Director Enclosure(s) R~Cl;'\'@~ ,- ;;4 ~7~/ ) 0-1 -. '-..It"-"" . "e' c, ~'/:CCL-' _ // A . Jill,,, _ /' / _ " G' ____ SS/TJB:lb , , I ,~ ~ } j " '1....... 1 620 s... dixit;!. highway p.o. drower 396 stuart, florida, 33495-0371) plx:!I':: '30')! 28(r3313 robert p. mi"cr dl..-,irm~ moorice: snyder ..n(~ (~o;rrn()f1 \. .........,- ., (orrT'O< (. (Of'lCr0n sam ~h'-l""""l ~eu.~tf:r; tr~,',,':~! :,> ',' ,J..:,".r I' f....-' ,.-..... A~ . '. , ....-. ...~ "', -~. .:. ," -.j STATE'OF FLORIDA .~, t ~ I .: ,,~ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 'AEGULATION .. SOUTH FLORIDA SUBDISTR leT [Ii) lr.~ l~~ k U \1 ~ U\~ - . I :..1 '.,; ~ "' .-. 80B GRAHt GOVERNC ;~~TORIA J. TSCH'NKr L~..J SECRETAF WARAEN G. STRAr SUBDISTRICT MANAGE 3301 GUN CLUB AOAD P.O. 80)( 3858 WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33402 December 17, 1981 . AP - Palm Beach County Motorola - Complex Source Boynton Beach Mr. Mike Halleman Heery and Heery 880 West Peachtree Street, Northwest Atlanta, GA 30367 I I I Dear Mr. Halleman: ~ Please be advised that as of August 27, 1981, the Complex Source Rule 17-2.05(8), Florida Administrative Code, was officially removed from'Department regulations. Since the Complex Source rule is presently not in effect, expired Motorola Complex Source permit need not be renewed. If there are any further questions please contact Mr. I. Goldman of this office 305/689-5800. Sincerely, L .32-' C fflJ-tL "--v ~C~ Wi~liams Section Head Air/Industrial Waste/Solid Waste JCW:i~. cc: Palm Beach County Health Department ~ Prorl!Ctin~!!orida and .Your Ouality of Life treOJure COOlt ~~ "'( !.Jc "...,.....,~;.... .....,,'" ~"...~...~...... -. '-~-~ .... ~...,.."... '-~ . I ~ (/:<<;;,;t.<m:;;!t,< .~~"~"', "",'__ reglQna ~ ;,:-;;+fd' ~1I111h "'. ~lj':>:: (.)fannlng W \1\:c ~ \919-- council st. lude t r ; f~l f- '.J , ' " -: ~.- . . - : ," r \ d ,. -'; - ":..! , ' :'1 :1 ~ ~1 It :j {,1 . ~ t ". ~ f~ 1 M E M 0 RAN DUM ---------- To: Heery and Heery ~Iotorola Incorporated City of Boynton Beach Howard Muise ~ December 4. 1979 l1otorola DRI Assessment Report From: Date: Subject: i , H 1 IJ ' ~ .J fj . .~ jt "j , , r~ ~ r~ , I , ~ -1 h J fl ,< :1 ~1 ; !i j ~J ~ ~ tf EJ , The Motorola assessment report should have the reference to Exhibit 31.5 on page 31-11 changed to Exhibit 31.6, and should have the enclosed page 31-11a added after page 31-11. Enclosures \ Appendix 1 ,.;.~-:o,~"' "_"\'~"~ "L ~,~ /~,,"-' ..............-.... .::" " ,,,,- .'. ...",. .-, \. /'.. './ "",,~,. ~_: l.,-"'-~- '. '\ \ ~ -\ /....:.1- -''''-, i '~', 0\ \~. (5" ):::': j \ c__..".~, " '.' I '\ . x. '-:'1 '" "~~;/ - '~ {:;'~ / JOp\; n ~..\:.: /, ;~~~..;u!i...;!' D;r~c .,.... R .., ~,.'"":i ~ ','_;d"~ ........ \.",., ......: ~ J j ;--~ ., ~ \l 1....). ....,t:....,.I....">".~ f""J -~ . ~ ~ t...j~3 \,\ i.--.'..~,~ :-. :.!".-.1""I1""l.,....,'..,r:r'lnn'r Oi,....,'!..ri,---;. 'J)\~~j';-~J J~!'.i~......JJ i~:'~~;4: ~'~, ;,' D:-' ~~j S j.~.....j POST OrF!C2 BOX "\I". WEST ?..\LM BeACH. F!..C~IDA 3:: 6-10~,-I -.' '\-"-"~' -i-:\ ,,"" ll\? \ <0. \ ,-, ~ --- \ {~.."i. _: ~ ~j..:;. ~.-1-)) \ ~ :~::..~,..,;:;......t-''"--'~- .~.. i 1 , , ' '. . ......... ... I ~ 't It, ~...., \ ~ d '-. .'f. .)-1 t i 1 "" ! ""f ~ j ".:' ! d ~:n .~) 1 : I \; ~'~'~~~~;;_.i:--;::-'-:-. ~~-= L::jr~-=\j UI...i:..::J'... .../.~~ . , .__..._,...--..'..November 8. 1979 TcU:;)r.0~~c {J,,)5) 686.: IN RePLY Pt:fE.= 1"0' Nr. Sam Shannon, Executive Directo:" Treas lire Coas t R2gi ana 1 Planning Council P,O. Box 2395 Stuart. FL 33494 Dear r1r. Shannon: En: 1 csed is the off"i ci ally approved copy of the D15 tri ct I s impact assessment report for the r'iotorola Development of Regional Impact. The report \'Ias approved by the Governing Doar'd on r;o'iember 8. 1979. ~e appreciated the opportunity to participate in the review process. Very truly yours, e0~ RICHARD A. ROGERS, Director Resource Control Departrr.ent PARI1 hk Enclosure ,'J""J:'; '. :~::;;!;" IV r:>/d)FIl:~:'~ . '::1\ I,J'l.l'i - re.." t f';_::,.~ V\'. .t. ~i.::.,:...HlORO~i.>~ L:02 Pj;-:c;.j R. HPHOY r,i":"T...'EgOj\~ fJE3(';:j 8;:"1 S:!=?J Hidr""dh :, i ;:.r,11 L' ;(JLc N,;: '- ~,' 'l.;n.iCE l PLUM;c~f:!-? F..~;t i\;y~rr NATHA'\ilcL REE=O H0t...~ Sound J. NE'L GALLAGHER St. CI')lJd JD:--,.' L HUN Pahok~e- @ MOTOROLA INC. October 27, 1983 Mr. Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director City of Bcynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 'lit ~ d: \\J LL~ '- ,7. C7"'/ ~-= ./,:'C; v c'" '..., ,,___I. ,/ 'S'-i C~.~ ../ -3 -:',1 1--\' I 1.; ': ::3 '~ J ~\:< , .,::..< .-',"".... -."" 1,"- \-.;.... '(, I I r:, \ ~ ,/ '.- Dear Carmen: One of the conditions of approval in Motorola's DRI Development Order (Ordinance 79-36) relates to coordination on mass transit. It reads: Upon commencement of Phase 1 operations, or any subsequent expansion, the Applicant shall provide the Palm Beach County Transportation Authority with information regarding the general location of its employees' residences and shall consult with the Authority regarding the feasibility of establishing or expanding routes to serve the plant. If bus service is provided to the plant, the Applicant shall provide boarding and unloading space on-site or provide space for turnout bays along Congress and Northwest 22nd Avenue, if needed. Motorola is now beginning to occupy the first phase of the project, and we are anxious to comply with all of the DRI requirements. However, we will be moving operations into the new facility continuously over the next several months, and many of the employees who are transferring from our Plantation facility have not yet moved their residences. Therefore, any data which we provided to the Transportation Authority at this time would quickly be out of date. When you and I discussed the issue, we agreed that the intent of this section would best be met by providing information at the point in which our occupancy of Phase I is largely completed, our employment level has stabalized, and most of the relocating employees have completed their moves. 1 would expect that this would be in the third quarter of 1984. Please let me know if this timetable for submission of data will satisfy the development order requirement. Thank you for your assistance. Hary Lou Lackey Regional Director, State Relations Paging Products Divl~lol' 6000 \\1 Sunrise Blvd, F: ~C::.Jderda:€. F:a 33322. (305\ .U5.50aO @ 120 H.E. 2nd AVENUe P.O. BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435-0310 (305)734-8111 ~ ~ --C-' .-.L....,_.>,;;.,";;~,-, . Lt..t.llE:.t:.~~...r-=-I"""P!.=t:J= I j '~~J, I ~ ' "'lm~p..il'ro=8ESE;::;:S ~ ! _~';A-:_~~~~'Si'~.~~! ' ~ !. ," :-;i:1- ~J.>- - :,.-.. . CITY of BOYNTON BEACH 7 November 1983 ~LL~;%, .~\ \-\_L '... '.(1 I~ CITY.- "~ ~:::- '. C::'" ~. ":,. ,: \~:: 'l") c, " - , \ \ c- .........- - t 1 d '-"3 CI - :C~ fl":? i ~ ....... <:::-- '-.:; . '\.....~ / ,::-;- -- ~. \ \ (...: ~ \~...y OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR Ms. Mary Lou Lackey, Regional Director State Relations l1otorola, Inc. Paging Products Division 8000 W. Sunrise Blvd. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33322 Dear Mary Lou: The purpose of this letter is to respond to your correspondence of October 27, 1983 in which the practical aspects of meeting Condition 12 of the Motorola Development Order were discussed. Clearly, the intent of Condition 12 is to establish viable bus routes to serve the new facility, and because of the time lag in staffing, this will not be possible until staffing is nearly complete. Your suggestion to wait until the third quarter of 1984 to submit the required in- formation, will result in a potentially more successful mass transit program, and in this regard, I find no inconsistency with the intent of Condition 12. Therefore, by copy' of this letter, I will notify the appropriate agencies who may have an interest in implementing this Condition. Yours very truly, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH en -cJ~ /bks cc: Carmen,S. Annunziato Director of Planning Executive Director, Palm Beach County Transportation Authority Executive Director, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council City Manager Building Official Central File treOlure COOf.t regional planniQg council December 14, 1984 Mr, Carmen Annunziato Director of Planning City of Boynton Beach 120 NE 2nd Avenue P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Subject: Motorola DR I Dear Mr~~~ The Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council is currently under contract to the State of Florida to monitor approved Developments of Regional Impact (DR!) . Of primary concern will be the status of each of the Development Order (DO) conditions, as well as cOl11llitments made in the Applications for Development Approval (ADA). These conditions and commitments for the Motorola DRI are grouped by subject on the enclosed list, We request that you provide Council with the status of each of these conditions/commitments. In the near future, Linda Monroe will be contacting you to obtain this information, We appreciate your time and involvement in assisting the Counci 1 in the monitori ng process. Yours truly, ?~. Sam Shannon Executive Director SS:pk Enc 1 os ure 620 s. dixie highway p.o. drawer 396 stuart, florida, 3349S-0396 phone (30S) 286-3313 hone... duncen chairman moggv hu,challa vice chairman thomes d. mccloskev, jr. secretary/treasurer sam shannon executive director @ MOTOROLA INC. August 4, 1983 Ms. Gwenn Godfrey Department of Environmental Regulation 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, FL 32301 Dear Ms. Godfrey: Enclosed please find a Hazardous Waste Notification for the Motorola facility located in Boynton Beach, Florida. Please contact me should you have any questions. '-'--...i. Very truly yours, NO'i'OROLA, INC. (JI' w. j~J Colette Sun EPA Compliance Nanager Enclosure cc: Fred Hilton Phil Lasala Ray Ochocki George Wallace Portable Products Division 8000 W. Sunrise Blvd" FI. Lauderdale, Fla, 33322 . (305) 475.5000 ~:"~ /.,.,~ ~ .', f i.:: .~ I:";' "~-~"'\ I ~ " -: , ,-' ..; -, I \-~.," "i!<)---i /'/,. . .~ :\.,' "11/' i....C \0' ~IJ),,\\....--- ". ..--' " -.. , ~ I^ ~'PA-- I~C . U.5 ENVIRONMENTAL P'''OTI'(.TION ,.(;ItNCY NOTIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE ACTIVITY III LOCATION 0,. INSTAL- LATION " ~ INSTRUCTIONS: If you received I prepdnte-d I,. ,--' .ffix ft in the space at 11ft. If any of the I. mation on the label is inCOrrK't, draw I line through It and supply the COrrect inforT1'\ltion In the .pproprilt. section below. If the label is complete and correct, 1'1Nt Item, I, II, .nd III below blank. If you did not receive I prt!prinmd libel. complete ,II iterm. "Installation" means. lingle site whel1l haum::Sous waste is genel"Jted. treated, stored .nd/or disposed of, Of' . trans, porter'l principal place of busineu. Please refer to the INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING NOTIFI. CATION before completing this form. The information requened herein i. required by I...... (Section 3010 of th~ Resourc, Conerv.don and RilCOYttry Al:rJ. INSTALLA- TION'S &PA ..D.HO. FL1>'18c7'1'1/DD /3o"r;'Be~ J. ::.:L-=....:;,~;. INSTALLA- 11. ::ft~,.I"G AOO"E.. PLEASE PLACE LABEL IN THIS SPACE .c ~ FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY c .. . c .c ~\ ~.. ';-.... \"~.,,;::. ':;..:;: ~..",.~Jr:-::.:. ......~. . ..~ '.' -:"'-;r; ,.--1(' . =: . ~:.:\TG~ /.. \ \. c.. __.::..' ,1--""""" /'c"-" ' '. " ' ~.;:' --,' , , :'-- ;: i b- "", Z.I~ CODE ::.,,~ '.....~.. .r.. ,:-: ,_ ~,__ .. L~, \........-' ['r \/ -" \/... ~l/:r-/I,,--, \ 0, IP --~ " , ZIP COOl[ / / .. ;/~~'.~~~.&i~~.:i'.i. V. OWNERSHIP . ., .~ . .. .. .., sz.. " ..y . .'.:~:~~f'r. '.' ","; '";~~ !;~:-r.d.~t;;:; .~t{~.:t~~.l:~.tk~~~~~.',l;;:~~2:~~~~:~"~r~~~f~~;.;~~:~;~~~:''; .c A, NAME OF INSTALL.ATION'S LEGAL OWNER u < r " u . C ("nr('rBr"h~1tEr~Fr-i~t~~ft~;>rn~~ box .... F - FEDERAL M - NON-FEDERAL VI. TYPE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE ACTIVITY (enter "X" in the appropriate box!es)} " .gjA. GENERATION DB. TRANSPORTATION (complete item VII) ., u M Dc. TREAT/STORE/DISPOSE .. Do, UNOERGROUND INJECTION .. VII. MODE OF TRANSPORTATION (transporters only enter HX'. in the appropriate box!es)) . ~..,..." :~~{~, :.. ~ ,",: ,\." ~'::;':\-,,-:~ OA.A'" .0 D.. RAIL .. Dc. HIGHWAY .. Do, WATER M DE. OTHER (,peel!)'): .. ~'.n?:","l~_~',,'_' ,~- ~''''''-'I'''-'r-' ;;;:7'.'''''J)<.-i~.""''1~-~~~ - VIII. FIRST OR SUBSEQUENT NOTIFICATION ..,"'~'O', '~<"C .: '_<v'i ,,;(i")Ci";;-"'uiI~~,;r~, -;, '.'~"<';".';',- o;f' .0;" ;,...,._i ':', .[' - , .. , ~ ",;:t;~:"'-...",,---.i~~-:c..~ 'lI...:JI~,.;,.IIl'-.._~ ,. ~~.....,,~~.,.._-......- Mark "X" in the appropriate box to Indicate whether this is. your installation's fi~t notification of hazardous waste activity or 8 subsequent notiLcatron. If this is not your first notification. enter your Installation', EPA 1.0. Number In the space provided below. [XI A. FIRST NOTIFICATION DB. SUDSEQUENT NOTIFICATION (comph!te Item C) IX. DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES :.~:: ~;-,( ,,';-'>i <;-::~i::t~':n,~--:,t;., -r::~;'-:;;51';;)?~~::' ~~:;~.. ..:'L:~>~'~~J...-: '-,; Please go to the reverse of this form and provide the requested information. EPA Form 8700-1216-80) CONTINUE ml REVERSE '. 'Y ....,_. ,- , '-'-- '.D. - "OA OF""ICIAL, U51:. ONL.Y W1--1 I I I I I I!.!.' ~ I -"i .. .. J lX. DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS WAS 1 ES (conlinucd from fronl) v_ .d., ........ A. HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES. Enter the four-digit number from 40 CFR hrt 261.31 for each lined haurdous wan. from non-specific sourc:es yOUr installation handles. Use additional sh.ts If neceuary. t a ~ . . . Flololl Flolol2 F 01013 Flo!ols I I I I I n.n.... .... D .-'. - '.. D . .. '-" -n --." n " '. - ,. .. -. , '" . . . t. " .. I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I a__..-..... '~ -,. " ..--~ " - '-n -. n n ---.- .... B. HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM SPECIFIC SOURCES. Enter the four-digit number from 40 CFR Part 261.32 for each listed haurdous waste from specific industria' 5Ources. your installation handles. Use additional sheeb if necessary. to U .. .. n to I I I I I I I I III I I I I I " .~ '" ---.--.. ,. .~ '" ,. " .- _. . ,. to a. " .. OJ .. /11 / I I 1/ I I I 1/1 I I ". ._-*- D' '. ..." " ...-- -,. " -' ,. D' .- '" .. '. n .. 00 .. .. .. .. I I I I I I I I I II III I I , - ." n '. ,. n ". ...--....... ,,- - .. " .. n ~, C. COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT HAZARDOUS WASTES. Enter the four-digit number from 40 CFR Pan 261.33 for each c:hemical sub- stance '(our installation handles whic:h may be a hazardous waste. Use additional shetU if neces:sary. .. .. .. .. .. .. III I I I I I I I I I I I I I n --__a__....... :I'.--.a ~ n .--.-.-- " n -~ ---at" a-- -- .-. '1't" " -" n .. .. .. ., .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. . - ft .. '.- '~ ,. ---.... .. . - ,. " -.-.-.. ,... n - -n " .. .. .. .. .. I I I 1 r I I I III I I I 1 I ft - n n - . ~ .-. TII n . '," .. - "n n '. . ,. .. -' '" D.l1STED INFECTIOUS WASTES. Enter the four-digit number from 40 CFR Pert 261.34 for each listed hazarcous waste frOm hospitals, veterinary hospitals, medical and research laboratories your installation handles. U$e additional sheets if necessary. .. .. U .. .. .. III I I I I I III III I I .. - .. .. .. . !! .. ,. .. - " .. - .. .. " E. CHARACTERISTICS OF NON-LISTED HAZA'f:iDOUS WASTES. Mark "X" in the boxes corresponding to the charBcterinics of non-listed huardous wanes yOur installation handles. (See 40 CFR Parn 261.21 - 261.24.) B" IGNITABl..lE O:t. CORROSIVE 03, REACTIVE 04. TOXIC (DOOI) IDOOZ) IDOO.) 10000) X, CERTIFICATION ~'~:;:~.~~:::~;~.~'f"~;~:~h~re~f;:}::.c?:.~t:~n.;~.~'i~~, :}...r.. -<:. S::~,.::;: :"~.~~.~: "'(:~'.:~'~!J~~t '~"'~~J'~i.~:-::':.:5 ,i&;' .~~ '0 . J certify under penalty of low that J have personally examined and am {ami/illr with (he information submitted in this and all ~ ) attached documents, and that based on my inquiry of thou indi},'iduals immediarcly responsible for obtaining the information, n I believe that the submicted information is true, accurate, and comple/e. I am aware thaI there ore significant penaltie.s lor sub" % mitting false information, including the possibilit), of fine and impriJonment. ~7~c~ NAME'" OFFICIAL TITLE fbp4' Of' print) OATE SIGHED George M.C. Fisher ~15 ~3 V.P. l< General Nanager Paaina Products Division EPA Form 8700-12 (6-801 REVERSE I . o . ~ ) n % . . . / .' .' ,I,C " .. ,. . . ,. , \ .-\ - \ I ~ ..: "/ - "./ j :-'-, ,,'''' I..:.' '. \ \; .. STATE OF FLORIDA ~ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION TWIN TOWERS OFFICE BUILDING 2600 BLAIR STONE ROAD TALLAHASSEE, r::LORJDA 32301-8241 ~ ~, ~ i~l' ">"", Of f\.dl~ SiP BOB GRAHAM GOVERNOR VICTORIA J. TSCHINKEL SECRETARY 7 1983' September 2, 1983 Ms. Colette Sun EPA Compliance Manager Motorola, Inc., Paging Products Division 8000 West Sunrise Boulevard Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33322 Dear Ms. Sun: The Hazardous Waste Management Program has reviewed your application for a hazardous waste EPA I.D, Number as a generator. Based on the information received you have been issued the following identification number for the facility at 1500 N,W, 22nd Avenue, Boynton Beach, Florida 33436: FLD 980799100. If any of the information on the Hazardous Waste Activity Form changes, please notify us in writing at the letterhead address. If I can be of further assistance, please call 904/488-0300. Sincerely, ~/).~ Gwenn D. Godfrey Solid & Hazardous Waste Section GDG/ls cc: Nell Keever Department of Revenue Steve Conn - DER/West Palm Beach ~~ .~,' \ \ --_.i. f,':"~~ U," -, './'\ ,,'. c. -'. . \ 'f"" '. C'. / , I . (-.: " . ,;/ , ,\. "'~"'''' Protecting Florida and Your Quality of Life n ( CITY of BOYNTON BEACH ~ @ .. . ..~" 120 H.E. 2nd AVENUE P.O. BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435-0310 C305) 734-8111 T OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR 28 January 1985 Ms. Linda Munroe Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 620 S. Dixie Highway PO Drawer 396 Stuart, Florida 33495-0396 , Dear Ms. Munroe: Accompanying this letter you will find a response to the Motorola Development Order questionnaire as requested. If, after you receive this document you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Yours very truly, , CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH , c!.-~'5~ Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director /bks cc: Mr. Sam Shannon Mr, Peter Cheney Central File o FOf apprCNal o As requested ti: F or your use 'rJ'ReJected o Furnish as submltled o Revrse and resubmIt o SUbmit speclhed Item o FurnIsh as requested - ..~ 0\ \ 17=/1 \ \ ,.,---~"Y ~ e'I'<' Ofd'~ <:,,> .........."""';-'EO"(~.T.J:: c- ~'-~:.~ ;.1~ '~\ \ e-i !lUIU,.\'" " E\ HEERY :3 I\C;; \ 4 ~~15~. t2) 1-'" 0' '. Y Heery InternatIOnaL Jne /' !l "L '; l' 880 West Peachlree Street N W Allanla Georgl?09 ~ ~ /...., 'i.1 Telephone.,404)8819880'Telex542165 'If'-r.- .,,', \. , 10,1\1);> c; Memorandum JO<Lelter of Transmittal o Enclosed please find one copy each of the "Roof Cool ing System Analysis" and _____"t\Jea.sibili~_tudy of a Solor Domestic Hot Water System" for the Boynton Bea~h fad I ity, Item o Attached 0 Under se~rate cover via o It enClOSures are not as noted kindly nollfy us a1 once Copy to 79 I 6a Signed ~ Michael A. Holleman, AlA Heery International. Inc 1 1 1 , 1 ~ 1 1 1 I I J I j J j 1 J ~lOTOROLA. I NC. BOYNTON BEACH FACILITY A ROOF SPRAY COOLING SYSTEM ANALYSIS by HEERY ENERGY CONSULTANTS, INC. 880 WEST PEACHTREE ST., N.W. ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30367 Septelllber 25, 1980 ,0LII::::: \,' -~~I :~\ C;T'( 0.F /\~ ........ - r .'--r. . --r_ ::: ",,:'l \=" 1 ,.'- ,,.... ,- .'_ ~J ; I ~. t- '-;J! ~ ~ /, ' " ",9 ~,. .. I 1 I by (:.:-,"--- 6" \ \'- L_L~'/~ " r'~--: "'F "(,,'I " B"". ",:" [) fJU~"_ :' ~-'~', "'2:\ . l' liG: 1 .~ lG33 F- i BOlk'_ ~_,_" !jj FLL..,;.'. ,,~'~ ......,....\~ j,.\\ 1 1 , 1 ~ 1 1 ) J J I I } J J .J J MOTOROLA. I NC. BOYNTON BEACH FACILITY A ROOF SPRAY COOLING SYSTEM ANALYSIS HEERY ENERGY CONSULTANTS. INC. 880 WEST PEACHTREE ST.. N.W. ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30309 September 25. 1980 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study compares two roof spray cooling system alternatives to th~ conventional roof to be used on this project. The two opt ions analysed are: Option No.1 - A system which uses lake water Option No.2 - A system which uses purchased city water The reduction in annual utility bills that would result from the installation of a roof spray cooling system which uses lake water is estimated to b~ '8.438 during the first year. With a net first cost of $32.643 (which includes an energy conservation tax credit of 101. during the first year), the systelll will result in cumlilulative discount~d savings equal to its investment value in 9 years, The cash flow analysis shown in figur~ 1 shows that the syst~m wi II produce a positive cumulative discounted cash flow in 2 years. In other words, this system b~gins to provide a r~turn on investment that is greater than normal investment gpportunities (defined by the discount rate of 101.) in 2 years. HO\lo'ever. it wi II take 9 years for the cumulative discounted savings to equal the investment value of the roof spray cooling system. This savings accumulates at a discounted internal rate of return of 26.31.. The reduction in energy consumption for Option No.2 would be the same as for Option No.1. The net first cost of this system would only be '25,083, but it would use '1.400 of water per year. This system would result in a discounted payback period of 8 years on its investment value. Figure 1 shows that Option No.2 will also produce a ~'ositive CUllllilulative discounted cash flow in 2 years. and wi II have a discounted intermal rate of return of 27.41.. FrOlll a sfT ict ly pconolllic point of view Opt ion No.2 wi II be better. However. Option No.1 wi II have greater long range benefits as is shown by its larger net present value 1$226.500 as compared to '212.391 for Opt ion No.2). The reason for this is because Option. No.1 incurs no annual purchased water costs. 1 I 1 1 1 , I ! } I ) I I ) I J I ) J J 200 DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW ($ 1000) 100 INVESTMENT VALUES 25 o POSITIVE CUMULATIVE CASH FLOW PERIOO 12 YEARS) TR.o-DITIONAL DISCOUNTED PA YBACK PER 100 OPTION NO, 1 19 YEARS) OPTION NO.2 IB YEARS) 10 20 30 YEARS MOTOROLA ....--;... . --, /-'. \ \-'/ '. 6~\ '-,-~. I.'!:;~ "y)...- .......)" of ~ './ 6)Y CI~I.). ~~;W~,I"\' ~/\\ 9' O'l\<"'i, o,'iIC' , \ "II'" " .- ~"IlI\.\) t, 'fc'O:> W? \ "',\1:)'1 \ ~~ cv<o'e.!;;"':- Oi'l~\ 1'1'01' ." C 'i\.o v, ~ (~ HEERY FIGURE 1- DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW OF F:OOF SPRAY COOLING SYSTEMS @ BOYNr:lN BEACH, FLA. Heery Energy Cansurlanls Inc I 1 1 1 , I ! J I I I I I I I I I I J It shDuld be noted that the pump ND. i cDuld be integrated wi th a ~01." I=="'i~ \ \ '--l.!...!../~ "iC't' n' C,C .~ ~: ,"i,., I c'-c', '~ ....... 60\,' ' .' I \' _ " ( r\ ,". " e. BU~" . -= ',' 1. 4 \933 f-: '0' fH t" m t ,. f" :-{,~.~' ;,.,,~~"jl lawn irrigatiDn Syste'fl. "1/;r:-rTrr... This rePDrt includes preliminary cost differences based Dn average lDcal installation CDStS of system components. A more detai led cost analysis can be developed only after the selection and detai 1 design of the roof spray cooling systelfl. The systems were evaluated by the HECON 59 hand-held computer analysis technique. and by the procedure developed by S.M. BlDunt at North Carolina State University. All economic criteria are based on DOE fuel costs projections. local systems costs. and typical business paralfleters (see page 4). ANALYSIS OF OPTION NO. 1 The roof spray coolinq system used in this analysis is assumed to spray inter/fdttently, and to use only enough water spray to keep the roof wet. This system is estimated to evaporate an average of about 2.470 cubic feet (18.525 gallons) of water per day. Using the procedure developed by S.M. Bount at North Carolina state University, we have esti/nated that the cooling capacity of the mechanical system can be reduced by approximately 45.0 tons. This reduction in cooling needs would result in a reduction in initial mechanical system cost of about '45.000. The total roof spray cooling system would cost about 181.270. Therefore. the first costs is estimated to be '8l.270 minus '45.000 or '36.270. This system is eligible for a 10% federal energy conservation ta>: credit during the first year. which will give a total net first cost of 132.643 during the first year. The roof spray system is estimated to have a first year ,naintenance cost of about .326 wh i ch is inf lated dur ing subsequent years. It is also estimated to result in an increase of annual ta=es and insurance premiums of 1326. The roof spray cooling system is estimated to save about 7.5 cents per hour-ton in operating costs. Since we would save about 45.0 tons and the faci lity would experience about 2.500 equivalent full load hours per year, we st.ould t,ave an annual I~s!!!~!l!H!. in utility bills of appro>:ilnately 18.438.00. Our HE CON 59 economic analysis shows a discounted payback period of 9 years and a 26.3% internal rate of return. It should be noted that the constant prevai ling breezes of about 9.5 MPH in this areas wi II boost the evaporation rate of water and therefore the syste"l perfor"lance on ttJis facility as compared to typical locations. ANALYSIS OF OPTION NO. 2 2 1 1 1 , I , I I J ) I J I I J I J J This option wi II use the saMe roof spray systeM as Option No. 1. However, its water supply would be purchased froM the city of Boynton Beach. Because this water is c leaner than the lake water used in Option No, i, the watlH filter C'3n be eliJoinahd. The piping froln the lake to the blli ldin9 can be el illtinahd, and the SysteM pUMP size can be reduced. Because of this, the SysteM cost would be reduced to $72,870. Since this option will also reduce the initial Iltechanical SysteM size by $45,000, the net first cost wi II be $27,878 Illinus the 107. federal tax credit, or $25,083. Option No.2 would also result in an annual reduction in energy bills of about $8,438.00 (see page 2). The HECON 59 pconoloic analysis shows a discounted payback period of 8 years, and an internal rate of return of 27.47.. ~C\\~::. iJ'~ (,,: ~ It::' ..c J i '... --!;!Y~ h'-I",</\ ., 'v\\ ,-,.,' \-~_\ I; / <:;) 1_ 1 !_:;> ~- /,' /'::' / ... > ../. ''\./,1' C I l/:r n\-~\'> ~ 3 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I J I I I j J j ASSUMPTIONS L Total installE'd SystE'I'1 costs = $.18/s<l.ft. (not including water supply syst p.m) . Wat er supply SystE'I'1 for O~.t ion No. 1 = S3c.,8l0. Wat er supply s)'stem for Option No. 2 = $28,410 2. 3. 4. IncrE'mental operating costs = S07.5/hr-ton 5. Equivalent full load hours = 2,500 6. A salvage value = 0 7. A mortgage period Of 30 years 8. ELectricity = $12.00/;~i lLiort BTU (S040/KWH) 9. E 1 e c t r i c i t y co s t s ..... i II e s c a 1 at e il t 151. 10. Inflatation ratE' = 101. 1i. A depreciation period of 30 years 12. An incorile ta:.: brackE't of 461. 13. Property tax and insurance costs of S363/year escalated at 101.. 14. Maintenance costs of $363/year escalated at 101.. 15. A 101. do.....n paYMent 16. A 101. discount rate 17. A mortgage interest rate of 11.5% 18. A roof area of 247,000 sq. ft. 19. A federal tax credit of 101. of initial investment during first year 20. City .....ater costs = $0.90/1000 gallons 4 '<~f-'O: . <-;}J-_LLjJ ;i,. ;:." .,- c' ~// f;' .'.. " \::'. , .', c-\ \. r= ' \'. "', ,:.:.q \/ ~"J 'y. ' A<'~ ..m~!JII,T\:Y' , , I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I 30. :::0. 0.9 O. 115 0,01 0,01 0.46 O. 1 0, 1 O. 15 :;:264:;:, o. 703. 12. 0, r'lLFE IILFE PFtHl r'lItH r'1tHE ItHT; ItH>'; I DSF:T GUlF EE::;C FeST '-"LE I .:. .,' ES"lG ECST AS'",IG , v , '. ,- , HECON 59 ANALYSIS MOTOROLA INC. BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA ....r) I Ir;. Dt.l 0, 16. -:;:264. ,-,.-, ,-,,-,--, ';";":'':'';'. 1 , '"i'F-: -:'7_11:' .:.. I "t "_', -769. 2. YF: :;::;:86. 2029. 3. .....F~ 4 1 25. C" 1 29. .-' 4, '''''F: 4>:/77 .., I. ,-,t:' .-,,-, .:.._''::'0:', C" '"('F.: -', 5'360. 1 .:,.:,.:..:.; , 6. ""'F.: 7092. 1 6::::':::::. . ... . ""'F.: ::::;:'3;:;. 2054 1 . , .-, 'i F.~ ':" '3'302. 25 1 6 1 , '3. ..,.. F: 1 1 63€.. ~:OO95. 1 O. 'iF.: 1 3634, '-,1:::" '-,C'--, .,:.,_1..:.,_1'::'. 1 1 . ""'F: 1 5'335. 40'337. 1 ..,. ""'F.: ,-, 1 ,-,t:' I-'''' C. ,_I e. f. 4E.:::59. 1 .-, \'F~ ':". .." 1 642. '- C"-, 1 --0'-' "_I.,:' '::":'. 1 4, 'r'R ~,C" 1 E: 1 '::"-' . 59754. 1 c- '.,..P "_I, -::.,~-::' 1 c- .-'. bb ~ 4:::. .. 5- 74122. 17. 3'3260. ::: 1 ::::::9. 1 B. ...t::'"..;t:'.-. "'t._I'"t._''::'. 90064. 1.::, ." 52582. 98662. 20. 60792. 1 0769:::. 21. 70245. 1171'30. ::: 112:::, 12715E,. ....,.-, '::'.:". 9:~:f59. 1 ::::7616. 24. 10:::0:::4. 14:::5:::9. 25. 124691. 1_- - - - 6UU'::i:::. 26. 143:::07. 172164, .-,-:, .::.... lE,5:::11. 1 :::4::: 12. .-,.-, '::':'. 191139. 198066. 29. 220291. 211 '353. :~:o. 253:::44. 226500. 226500. 9. 'lR ",'F: ~"F: 'i'P .....F.: '''''F.: ""'F: .....F: .....F.: I ..... F.~ 'i'F: '''''F: .....F: YF.: 'y'F.: t,lF".... PB i 1 1 1 , 1 ~ 1 1 } I f J I J J J J J HECON 59 ANALYSIS MOTOROLA. I NC. BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 16. 1. 2745.00 .., ..., 3:;::::::::3. 00 17 " :3:::::::6.00 .., ~'. ::::9260. 00 1 c:, 45452.00 19. 4125.00 4, 4'377" 00 c- "_I. 525:::2. 00 20. 60792,00 5'360. 00 21. t.. 70'32.00 70245.00 .., ,- . .:,.:. .:....:.... ::::;;'?:::. 00 :::112:::,00 ,-, .:' " ';:"':'. '3:365'3. 00 '3902.00 9. --,.<1 L'-t. 10:::0:::4.00 11636,00 10. 1:36:34.010 11. 15935..00 25. 124691.00 26. 14:3:::07" 00 1.;, ~. ':"'i" 1E,5:::11.00 1:::587.00 1 :3. 21642.00 14. 25161. 00 .::. ':'" 19111:39,00 2'3. 220291,00 :30. 25:3:::44. 00 15. 29215.00 ~LL":,;>, /'~" r, _,' . ,,'.)c ~ - - ;.- '"\ " - ....\ I~ ::. ......~ \ 1,- . . \ "' {'=-- - ~"I,' t. 1. _ -.... ,-- i C ' _ GJ \...... . ' I ~G.' 6l "<i-!..~I r \ g;>7 32E,43. 00 26.27 6- I t'l',,! \1 ; --- .----. - . --0,{l.L.t:G~~, .{:, \,' ~""~"'\ u.. err'!" '-' -"/ . ....,-.. ' ........ ,-..._.-.1 " _'" Y '-. Be" d. ' ,-' .., ./ \ e........ LlJ\lO.:~" ." 'r\"1 ...:: 1 ,c"''''' , I-J' _ .,r-'\~ 1 (,;.. \;:,~.''::> ,C " , ~ ~? 1..- .-'" c-- ....\ r'(,. - ~ ,~.' ;.:::: // -- ,- ..=.. ~ / . /. \.0: I 'o--'n-'1\ \ ' I,~ i 1 1 1 , 1 ~ 1 1 J I I J I I J J J J 30. ::::0. O. '3 0, 115 0.01 0,01 0,46 O. 1 0, 1 0.15 250::::=:. 0, 703. 1 '::' -. -1400. HECON 59 ANALYSIS MOTOROLA. INC. BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA t'lLFE IiLFE PFtHi t'1ItlT t'1tHE IthT I It'ln; . Ii::;RT GItlF EESC FeST S'.,ILE 0, -250:::. 1- 240:::. -31 '3. 2. 29:::3. 2147. " .;0. 3650. 4::::::9. ES'./G 4. .-t .~ .-,--, ""t""t,::-.':,. ECST A::;I.lG 7910, ~ ._1. C' .-, ~ ,-, __I":' ! ':'. 11212. E,. 6354. 147'39. ,. 7554. 1 :::675. ,-, ':'. :::942. 22:::46. '3. 1054:::. 27:~:20. 10, 12405. 32102. 11. 14552. ::::720::::" 12. 17034. 426:;:0. 13, . 1 '3902. 4:::::::95. 14, 2::::215. 54509. 15. 27043. t,09:::2. 7 '-t' F.~ 16, 31463. Dtl 'r'F.: 67:::::::0. 17 " ::::6566. 'r'R 75064. "i'F~ 18. 42457. :::2700. 19. 4'?257. 'r'F.: 90754. 20. 57104. "(F.: 99242. 21. .....F.: .....F.: ! ,- ,- 1~- t,t, ::1 {. 10;:; 1 :::2. .-,.-, c..::.. 76602. 11 -~,-,,-. ... ! '-; :;":". .....F: 2:3. :::;:;649. 1274'3:~:. "..., .~ '::''1'. 102544. 1 :37'304. 25. 11 ::: 5 rE.7 . .....F.: ' ..... F: 14::::::47. .....R c:t. . 137041. 160:345. '::'1. 15::::~;:~:9. .....F: 17242::::. .-,.-, '::'C'. I .....F.: i .....F: I 1:::2:::91. 1 :::51 05. 29. 211190. 1 '3:::41 9. 30. I I "24:;;:::05. 2123'31. ..... F: 2123'31. ~, . C'. .....F.: YF.: .....F.: .....F.: .....F~ 'iF.: "F.' I I, YR .....F: .....F.: YF~ .....F: "(F: "(F: .....F: tlF"~ ' P8 ' I , , 1 1 1 ~ 1 ~ I I ) i I I I J I I J ] ~<?i,-::' \ -- ~ '. - ' r:." ~,~-, r '- '-'" "- '-- D- " " '. - \ ~ i' MOTOROLA, INC. BOYNTON BEACH FACILITY A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A SOLAR DOMESTIC HOT WATER SYSTEM HEERY ENERGY CONSULTANTS, INC. 880 West Peachtree St., N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30309 June 6, 1980 I 1 1 1 " 1 ~ 1 1 1 I I 1 I J J J j J MOTOROLA, INC. BOYNTON BEACH FACILITY A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A SOLAR DOMESTIC HOT WATER SYSTEM by HEERY ENERGY CONSULTANTS, INC. 880 West Peachtree St., N.W, Atlanta, Georgia 30309 June 6, 1980 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY When compared to a conventional electric system, a flat plate liquid solar domestic hot water system (DHW), using 2,000 Sq. Ft. of collectors, will have a discounted pay-back period of 6.1 years. The life-cycle savings (over 30 years) will be about $100,300.00. This assumes a first cost of $30 per Sq. Ft. of collector minus a 15% direct U. S. tax credit. This gives a total net first cost of $51,000.00. It should be noted that if any hot water can also be used for any type of industrial process, an additional 10% direct tax credit can be taken. This study analyzes the hot water system needs for the facility's cafeteria. It is estimated that it will serve approximately 1,600 people per day a lunch meal, and will also provide snacks between 6:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. The total hot water demand per day is estimated at 3,500 gallons. We have not included the facility's restrooms, because of the long distance between them and the cafeteria, and the implied cost for piping to serve these restrooms. This report includes preliminary cost differences based on average local installation costs of solar system components. A more detailed cost analysis can be developed only after the selection and design of the most cost efficient integration of mechanical and solar systems. The systems were evaluated by the F-chart hand-held computer analysis technique. The first costs were reduced by 15% to account for the avail- able federal solar tax credit. All economic criteria are based on DOE fuel cost projections, local solar systems costs, and typical business parameters (see page 6)., /-'~0-L.;-" ~ 6; ." . "1/ '" ""'''''.' I ~_ ,-.' " ........ L" b'- , 1 ' '" ''- -'" , , , .- ; -1- ..- , / ,'I \.s/ . " ".....: / '\.: ' /.... ';I <-!<i, ) LU--r03J{ ~_ _ 1 1 1 , 1 ~ 1 1 I I I I I J J j J J SYSTEM ANALYSIS The solar system used in this analysis is a flat-plate, liquid, two- tank, drain-down system as described in Figure I, The solar heated water will be stored in the solar tank which will serve as a preheat tank for the conventional DHW tank. The collector pumps will be controlled by a standard differential controller which reads the relative temperatures of the solar tank and the solar collectors. The system is estimated to have a load of 3500 gallons per day. A solar system with 2000 ft2 of collectors will cost about $51,000, and will deliver 63% of the annual DHW load. Electric vs. Solar Increase in Investment Costs - Net Present Value of Savings 15% tax credits 5 years 8 years 30 years = $ 51,000.00 = - 1,442.00 = + 3s694.00 = + 100,295.00 $ 5,312.00 6.1 years Fi rs t year fuel cos t savi ngs Discounted payback period DOMESTIC HOT WATER SYSTEM ASSUMPTIONS 1. 2, 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 2l. 22. A solar heat storage tank of 1.8 gallons per ft2 of collectors An average daily usage of 3500 gallons F'r('e'oC)n = .762 FrU1 = 1.2 Set temperature of 1400 F Mains termperature average of 740 F A salvage value of 0 A mortgage period of thirty years Economic analysis periods of 5, 8, 30 years Depreciation period of 30 years Income tax bracket = .46 Property tax rate = 0.0 (solar systems are exempt) Insurance and maintenance cost at first year = .01 x investment cost Down payment = .10 x investment cost Discount rate = .10 Mortgage interest rate = .12 Inflation rate - .10 Fuel inflation rate = .14 (elec.) Collector area dependent costs = $15/ft2 - 15% Federal tax credit = $12.75 Fixed solar system costs = $30,000.00 - 15% Federal tax credit = $25,500.00 Annual load = 702.64 MMBtu Electricity = $12.00/~~Btu /\i:' ~ I. i~ ~:~. ,c:.\,'~ ,'-(' '>... '- '.. . ," ',). ......' '-'- .,\ D. t,", ,/__\ - -.. - ., . 1 . . r .... "'I l ~ J. I~ _.) - I ~-i -.....~f " I , -./ L- -2- ___ t _ ...- Cr~', .'J..., .' ~.rlll ~-r\ \ ' ~- ~ .?, ))--W-!-L(/ /"'-" ".f~ :,- , r, . c~ ~. ~ \i}. j \,. ~'lll i :.'_.. ~~::.--~ ~ {; '" .... -'" o '" ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ "., "'-p. Q)p. ...:,::> :;<'" , '~ "'~ ~'" S;Q) ..."" ",'" ,...'" 00 "'->;:. ~ ::> p. ... % Q) ,... , ,... ~ ... '" ~ -3- ----" \ -:: - l1J r- (/) r (/) 0:- u.! r- d. - ?- '" 0-", S;c <>'" .r'" ....... ~S %'" -0:;< L> - r- (/) \1.1 -; - o o 0:- o U- ~ Z - r- d. u.! ::I: 0: d. ..J o (/) u.! 0: ::J t: \' ~ I 1 1 1 , l' ~ 1 1 1 1 1 J J J J J J J F-CHART WEATHER DATA MOTOROLA MFG. FACILITY BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA EPGL = -::H 1. 2035.9 -:' L, 2419.3 '_'t ~::!E,2r 0 4. 3254. 1 C' "_I. 3475.2 b. 3544. ::: .. . :~:4'?'? 4 ':'. ,-, -, -,-:, .-, .:..,.:'.::.,,, ..:. .... 2'394.=-' 10. .-, ~ .~ . -, .::. "_'''t,;:,,, .:.. . . i 1 " 2121. ::: ~ .-, 1 .::.. 1922, 1 : r I.~ .... ---' , "- , . /,", ':\ ..-\ " ~ ; - . .- j -_I -' .~ " ~ 'I , .- 1. 1. 42 1. " . t'.:t. :::6. o. 94 1 " ...., ...I:."t( " .:. L, 2. 1 ,-,.., _" .::. f 0.94 t: t." 90. 1 761. ':'. '_'a 70. 1. 11 0:..;.. '::':". o. '?6 1 :::2:;:, C' .-'. .:t. 0.e7 j.':,. o. t.. i -;-'4:3. u. :::.:: C' "_I. , . -:,,-, .. ::,,, o. ::;5 o. ': " 162'? o. 32 b. -."" >:-1 I_' ,i. ~ 1.04 o. 10. 1.19 11. 1, 3::: 12. 1. 46 1506. .. . ,-,.-, .:'..: " O. 1541. .-, ':'. .:...:. o. 1594. 9. ::: 1. O. 15:::5. 10. If. o. 1 ~55D. 1.1 . . . -:".-, , .:.. .:....L.... 16('3. 1,;. ~. t,t.. Ii" 1 C' ,'- ._It:. (" -4- -1 1 1 1 , 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 I I I I I J J 9LL'6i-;~.. ''''''~ C'T' r.~: ~. __, \ 1 --:-." '/-~ -' 80',';'1':'" . '. ~ ~. - .,".' - " 8- e;JIL[.... " , , . - -" , 1 ^ '.. :J , {.'" ......- 1--; '- , r ,~: 1-/, L:. ~. ~ /::.1 \, ~frr''''~0t? ~ HECON 59 ANALYSIS MOTOROLA INC. BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA 1. 240:::.001 1 E.. :;: 1463. 00 17. 365E.6. 00 18. 42457.00 19. 49257.00 20. 57104,001 .;, 1 ~ .. ~. c. 298:3. 00 ~ ":". :3650. 00 4. 4432.00 ~ "_I. 5318.00 1:.. E,354.. 00 66157.00 -,:,.:. ......... 76602..00 ,. , 7554.00 c' '_'a ';:":". :::864';'. 00 8942.00 24. '3. 102544..00 10548.00 101, 12405.00 11. 14552.00 ,-,t:'" .::....1. 118567.00 26. 1370141.0101 .-,"",:, ':'i. 1,-, .::.. 15:::~::~:'3. 00 170134.00 13. 19902.00 14. 2:3215. 00 15. 2704:::.. 00 ~I'-' '::":'. 1:::2891. 00 2':':. 211190. DOl :::0. 24:::::::05. 00 250::::3. 00 27. :36 8 I t,lV :-:1 1 1 1 , 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 J J I J J J J j F-CHART THERMAL ANALYSIS MOTOROLA MFG. FACILITY BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 1 . , 0.75 ~. 0,:::0 .:. "_'a o. _ _ .:1. Ocel "-'. 0" '('3' 6. 0.7'5 , . o. ''':'. o. "?'? D. 7::: 10. 0.-;--5 11. 0.7::: 1 ~. 0.7'::' 13. "::::000. 702.64 Ot, 0.78 ~\):ELII':->-, /~\ ,-- - -~;-~>, t.,~.- , \ 10'- .c," . ,,\ '-' ....- - - ., " "3 :=-) , 'J' 1- ,;j')' 1'-' \ /' (:, l ! I -'I' '. _-" -----~-_. 1. 0.60 1. o. ::::7 ~, 0.65 0.40 ..., '':'. ''':'. o. t=,9 4. CI. ~ ( 0.4:::: of. 0, 1 " "_:. 5. 0.t4 o. ,.,",:, t:. t" o. c;,~ o. .::t, , . ,.. " O.t:" o. = ':'. - ':' " o. ?d.. U. :_:::: '::. ,', 9. o. ,:.:: 10. O. 60 . 1 1 ... " 0,64 1 ~. o. ~::: o. '_ _ 10, 0.36 11. O. ';:9 1 ~, O. ";'5 1 :::" 13. 1 00-0. 2000. 702. 64 ClE. O. E:::: 702. 64 DE. o. :::::i -5- I ) 1 1 I I J I I I J I I I I I I J ) F-CHART ECONOMIC ANALYSIS MOTOROLA MFG. FACILITY BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ~~ ~'-." s. ,-' C". <<'"', ,. ;--,,,. ,'..... ........ ~'., I, " .... R ~U' c, . \ - - ..., 1_,- ~ . _ -: \ ~ \ \ -.. " '1' '.,~ I , " ','. -I L":, . '..~. l:.J - -, f'~l ,--;j ./ ,co // ~'/ r^ . . -, ,-,/ " :,:,/ / 1" .., . ';y . 0, f t '-~"'" \ \.. :,::u. ':' " o. ::::::: 100!=i. ('066. 2'?"?E '~3 -:0 ~ .-, -l ,-, ,-, -;> ---:' -, ,-, -! J..'::'" 1 ':":'! ' .::.:::' C. f,.3 ;;:'Ci!:!Ci. 1 :::02':'. 5':"-'~'? ::::6'33.7E7-:::E7 D. 7::: ..:' !_"_ ,_i. 2200;;:. ~:,.:;7 4::::';:::1: ::~4::: 1 ::": t'1 ':p E 'IF: FFAC AF:EA F' :iA" C ':.A!'} FF:AC AF:EA F '. f'j',,' C :::H\" FF:'~F- FiFER !="::H',;' C ': A\' ':::0. t" U. :3;:: 1000" 2;::C7" E _;:'?;:::1 1 -24:::4. 74'?744 0.6:;' 2000. '::i'?5~. O?071::; 42. ::::2:::6 :::"?o~:; 0. 7::; ...:;u _~u. 1206:::.51111 -151. 12'?':~<: 7;:: -:2- 11 '{ P E ','F: Fr::RC AFEA E ::A'/ CSA",,' FF':RC AEE'A F' ~:: H' I C ':'fiI.,,' FF:AC fiF:EA P':.A ..,.' CSp-....' ::::0. :~:C1. 30. o. 0.46 o. C.01 0, 1 0, 1 n 1';' -". ... '- o. 1 O. 14 12.75 25:;00. 702.64 12. o. "::;:: 1 ClOD. 11 C;4:.:'f!. n::; ::::. - - - - - - - - -- 55006. 31 :~~C~ =: c. t ~: 2':1(:0. 2: 0 :::; ~::. Ci:;. ;:: Ci C::: 1002'35. 1 :':.t, n 7::~ C. 7':; 2'30CI.-6. 2.43 1517:,? 2.6::: ":::0. 5. ('. ":::::: : cc Ci. J4:. C2r= ;'C'? -- 1 ~ U. 5.; C'?::::::: u.b3 2000. t.47'!. ':::7~:~t:,~.5 -1442. "::;E,47'3: I-I ~':' '_'. 1 '.' ::;C1CO. 7-;-':::0. 1 DCt. - 1 ?6'3. ::: :,2'::t ::; t'l ....F: E 'lE D ",'p ::;AL'./ I T:'< F' T:',': I t'l DDI.,JtJ D I ::;C ItH GItJF FIHF DL,/A DLF>'; LOAD FUEL FPAC AFEA P ::' A'.,.. C': W... FPAC AF:EA F.:~::;A\' C'~;A') FF~AC RF'EA F.:::, A \,' C~:;A'...' t'l 'IF: E ....p FF'AC AF'EA F:':;A\' C::,A'.... FF'AC AFEA P':.fi\' C:: A'','' FPRC RF:EA P ':,A '.,.' C.::;A\' 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I MOT O~OL-A I~c... K \TC-\-! ~N. 1-\01 \Vp.TJ'i.t2.. PE-MANO. " .P~/iLIl-'1. A W1 0 1.,.-1"- 'BY TE.L,..~ ,...," tEQVI~/:} F 120M .J 0 t.. L.At4I A c.-H-O 1:;""- \3- Bo o I'-{ 0 TiC-WI /. qAl.~~ S/H 'LID p..'f ::>0 @ 100 E:.FF. ~01-\a\ ...,. I "t '"J/4 k~S -7- ff4> 'BA (J\...E.. US fL c.. A.IA-'I - S? f'~. ~l. ~ k~t' ;:t" ~$ 1-- '1lw-;; 14 4f> <a~ /J~ or o ("'YO t ~Sr: - 4~'/ bt-'1 P1f.Mf1JD - ~/1.11f1J) ~t? ~ptl" ~ '''0 0 ~ ;WO 'i'eJ. /d~ <7~\Jl:iD ~ "!>,w "'oj, /~ 17/ t t- tit { t L ( t l { l { t t.11f4. ero bO '3" f: 0 0 <..v 1-0 "Z-( 'l../ 55 ~ J. '__ -- - '/,. . ,'," / I, / c . ' . . , I,,:.l.~'~""" @ MOTOROLA INC. November 7, 1983 Edgar E. Howell, Building Official City of Boynton Beach 120 N.E. 2nd Ave. Boynton Beach, Fl 33435 RE: Vacuuming of Parking Lot Bud: All parking lots at the Motorola site in Boynton Beach will be on a schedule vacuuming program after the full certificate of occupancy is granted. We are currently in the process of investigating units that can be operated by Motorola personnel and also investigating sub-contracting to an outside vendor. Sincerely yours, Motorola Inc. Paging Di';'iSiO%/;: , ,/// I ,/ ,/ ., , " L::..... . ,._ C /..'~ '- -'.. t, Ray Ochocki Centr~l Services Manager RO/mm Paging Products Division 1500 N,W, 22nd Ave, Boynton Beach. Fla, 33436- (305) 736.3400 ~LLr~' ,-'.0 " errY C, .. y<:\ u.... . ,r -', \ ........ r"V. - ", . --......' -( \ ........... e'~" - _ 1.,1_ ,\ 8""": C\';;'-' .,_'" \=-. 1 ,~ .,>) l_ h . , --..- l-~' r..., /......., /' ~~ ", ./ ,- ", /" -",'- /i~TTI;;'\ :- . ,~OTOROL A ABBREVI~ TIONS IX) Development Order, Boynton Beach Ordi nance 79-36, January 7, 1980. ADA Application for Development Approv~l, October 1,1979, Supple- mented November 30, 1979. ADMINISTRATION 1. The followin9 are a part of the OR! Order: a. The Application for Development Approval submitted by Motorola, Inc. to the Ci ty of Boynton Beach dated October 1, 1979. b. Suppl ementary and amendatory materi al s submitted under cover letters dated October 11, 1979 and November 30, 1979 from John Gesbocker of Heery & Heery Architects and Engineers, Inc. (in Treasur'e Coast Regional Plannin9 Counci 1 library copy of ADA). c. Supplemental information provided under a cover letter November 21, 1979 from Mary Lou Lackey of c1otorol a, Inc. Treasure Coast Regional Plannin9 Council library copy of ADA). dated (i n d. Master Plan and accompanying docu:nents submitted in conformance with Planned Industrial Development (PID) rezoning application and subdivision re9ulations of the City of Boynton Beach. (00- Condition 15) 2. Actual timing of the phases of development may vary from the ADA. (00- Condition 21) 3. Within 60 days of the Development Order the developer shall submit a revised ~laster Development Plan, and other revised pl ans as are appro- priate, to the City Planning Director, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the Division of State planning. These revised plans shall incorporate all changes, if any, in the development as required by this mI Order. (DO-Condition 22) ENVIRONMENT Air 1. A complex source permit 'liill be required, (ADA,13-1) Archaeological Sites 1. If there are found any 'irchaeological artifacts dllring project construc- tion, the developer shall avoid damage in that 'irea and notify and cooperate with the Division of Archives, State of Florida. Proper pro- tection, to the satisfaction of the Division of Archives, shall be provided. (DO-Condition 1) PUBLIC FACILITIES Was tewater Management 1. No on- si te sys tern for treatment or di sposa 1 wi 11 be us ed. (ADA, 21-1) Drainage 1. On-site retention facilities will be designed to store first inch of runoff from the one-hour, three-year storrn prior to discharge into E-4. Discharge into E-4 will be controlled by weirs restricted to a rate of 43 cfs for a 25-year frequency, 24-hour duration stonn. Two points of di scharge are proposed into E-4 from the si te. (ADA, 22-1) 2. Motorola will operate and maintain the drainage facilities. (ADA, 22-2) 3. A program of regular vacuum sweeping of all paved surfaces on the pro- ject site shall be instituted and carried out by the developer. A description of this program shall be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Counci 1, South Florida Water Management District, Palm Beach County, the Area Planning Board and City of Boynton Beach. (DO-Condition 2) Water Supply 1. A non potable only water well was proposed near the dock yard. This would be operated and maintained by Motorola. (ADA, 23-2) 2. In order to insure adequate water pressure and flow, the developer stated the following would be provided. a. Fire water supply system will be implemented with the addition of an electric fire pump 'as a source of primary back up and a diesel drive fire pump as a secondary back-up. b. A 224,000 gallon fire water storage tank will be added in accor- dance with NFPA 13-24. C. T\vo retention lokes on-site as an available source of fire protec- tion water. (f\OA, 23-3) Solid vlaste 1. The developer shall request DER to determine which of its projected chemical wastes ',yould be classified as toxic or hazardous. (DO- Condition 3) 2. The develqper shall develop and institute special handling and disposal procedures for its toxic or hazardous \Hstes which are acceptable to DER. (DO-Condi tion 4) 3. Plan operation for the proposed DRI shall not be permitted to begin unless Conditions 3 and 4 above have been met (pl'eceding t\iO Conditions on this page). (DO-Condition 5) Ene r gy 1. The developer shall fully investigate the options for meeting hot water requirBnents, completely or in part, through the use of solar energy or waste heat recovery. Results of this investigation shall be presented to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the City of Boynton Beach. If cost effective, the developer shall implernent the most fea- sible and effective of these options during construction. (DO- Condition 6) 2. Two Bnergency e1 ectri cal power generators are p1 anned to be on-site. (ADA, 25-1) 3. Evapol'ative cooling and a roof spray system would be considered. (ADA, 25 -3) TRANSPORTATION 1. The developer shall provide an easement along Congress Avenue and ~Iorth- west 22nd Avenue to accornmodate a bikeway/pedestrian path and construct an 8 foot bike path in the easement. (DO-Condition 7) 2. The developer shall conduct a study in conjunction with the Boynton Beach Pol ice Department to determine if security fencing is required around the parking areas around the pI ant. If such a secur i ty fence is needed at any time in the future, such securi ty fencing shall be constructed. (DO-Condition 7) 3. The following road and traffic improvements wi 11 be needed as the pro- posed project is developed by the Applicant: a. The intersection of all project drive'Nays \vith Congress Avenue and Nodhwest 22nd Avenue shall be improved with left turn lones, right turn 1 anes and traffic si gnal s, as \'Iarranted by the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer. b. The intersection of Congress Avenue and Northwest 22nd Avenue shall be improved wi th 1 eft turn 1 anes, ri ght turn 1 anes and traffi c signals, as warranted by the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer. c. The high\vay improvements described in the folloVling Sections of the Agree1nent bet'Neen Palm Be,1ch County and Riteco Development Corpora- tiondated August 1, 1973, rel ating to traffic impacts of the pro- posed Sandhi 11 Project: Section, III - Traffic signals; Section IV - Left turn lanes, NorthVlest 22nd Avenue and Seacrest Boul evard; Section V - Intersection of Congress Avenue and Northviest 22nd Avenue; Sect i on VI - Four 1 ani ng of Congress Avenue. d. The wi deni ng of Congress Avenue between Boynton and Hypol uxo Roads to an ultimate six lanes, with the design level of service for highVlay planning designated by the i1etropol itan Planning Organiza- tion. (DO-Condition 8) 4. The developer shall give written notice to Palm Beach County of its intent to commence construction on any approved faci 1 ity in the pro- posed project, not less than six months (and preferably one year), prior to the date upon which it proposes to cOlTlmence such construction. (OO-Condition 3) 5. The developer shall dedicate to Palm Beach County the following right- of-way along the entire roadway frontage: Congress Avenue 60 feet from centerline; Northwest 22nd Avenue 60 feet from centerl ine. (DO-Condition 9) 6. The developer shall establish and actively support a car p"Qling pro- gram. At the end of the first year of Phase 1 operatlons, the devel- oper shall provide a written report to the Treasure Coast Regional Plan- ning Counci 1, the Metropol itan Planning Organization and the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer on its activities and an evaluation of their effectiveness. (DO-Condi tion 10) 7. Within one year of the commencement of Phase 1 operations, or any subse- quent expansion of facilities, the developer shall undertake a study of the feasibility of establishing or participating in a van pool ~rogram.....- the resul ts of that study to the Treasure Coast Regional Panning Council, the i~etropolitan Planning Organization and the Palm Beach County Traffic engineer. (DO-Condition 11) 8. At the beginning of Phase 1 operations, or any expansion, the developer shall provi de the Palm Beach County Transportation Authori ty wi th infor- mation regarding the general location of its employees' i'esidences and consult with the Authority regarding the feasibility of establishing or expandi ng routes to serve the pl ant. If bus servi ce is provi ded to the plant, the developer shall provide boarding and unloading space on-site or provi de space for turnout bays along Congress and ilorthwest 22nd Avenue, if needed. (DO-Condition 12) 9. Staggered shifts \;ill be implernented to reduce traffic loads. (ADA, 31-6 ) 12.1 13.1 20.1 20.2 20.3 -, 20.4 20.5 20.6 24.1 30.1 31.1 31.2 3; .3 37.1 37.2 LIST OF TABLES Motorola Phasing Average Daily Emissions (Pounds/Day) Palm Beach Employment Statistics 1970-August 1979 Estimated Employment in Nonagricultural Establishments, West Palm Beach/Boca Raton SMSA (Palm Beach County) Estimated Geographic Distribution of Construction Expenditures (1979 Dollars) Estimated Employment and Payroll- Noncunstruction Employment by Income Range (1979 Dollars) Ad valorem Tax Revenues Projected Solid/Chemical Wastes by Phase Fire Protection Services Hhich VIould Serve tl;otorola Site Trip Generation Rates levels of Service Average Daily Trips and Employment by Phase Air Freight Projections Number of Employees II-2 13-1 20-2 20-3 20-4 20-4 20-4 20-7 24-1 30-1 31-1 31-3 31-3 37-1 37-1 """,6" 12.1 12.2 31.1 31. 2 31.3 31.4 31.5 31.6 LIST OF EXHIBITS Motorol a Locati on Ilap Motorola Conceptual Site Plan and Phasing Existing Conditions Phase I Conditions (198]) Phase II Conditions (]990) Phase III Conditions (2000) Summary of Traffic Conditions Developer Commitments for Four-laning Congress Avenue II-2 II-3 31-5 31-6 31-7 31-9 31-10 31-12 ----~-_._-~-- ..;<;F:;L.;2U~l1tiLlr~~i;<Ei~J treOJure ,',7 .:;t. Jude ' COOJt f . ' .. r ", "-_~_...'w.r~"..,,w,,"~=~, ---~-""j]-'" It I i ..... !:"'. '-~~m(1n:iri:'::j';:r,::::\~~~c:..1::~:c,: r...~t)~oV":\a.. '. ~J ..-::: -. -. .;,' " ":..' ....~__...c.- ,...:r... ;_..,....-..<._._...,.~A~ ,"" -:.c"" ~ ~~ '4J~J d ~ ij ,:::~>.'.'K~hF.i?~'l.-7~~'~s'0T~~ ola,t"u"":l~ng '..lPh'~ ' ~~~~.s ~ 3i n Ii ' ~l'~: f,' ,- ..,. council 'I' " . : '-j :'-.:. :" ;. f~. ' ',.. ;~- '3< ;} '.. .,~ d:~ '~l j ;. -~ '.--'1 Ii "1 ..~j , , "~ :",1, :~ 1 }-.:J '''"1 1 fJ ',.,.., ~ .'1 "'j .-' :J' ~ :1 A . ,',f l.i '.:::i ~:1 :J 'j,; ;~i tl ,I r~ :1~1 ,,1 ' " :1 c) ''1 ....~ ~-!! ) [: ::1 ,'3 'J ~.~ .-j , J --, !;J ':j :<'4 I:) ;~ , , ;~'J H , ! .~ '-1 r'l 'J ; , , ; ..j,. .\. .. ---~ ~:~--';-. ~~'::'~~~~~~~~ DEe 10 1979 December 10, 1979 The Honorable Edward Harmening Mayor, City of Boynton Beach 120 N.E. Second Avenue Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Subject: Motorola Development of Regional Impact Dear Mayor Harmening: I am hereby transmitting the report and recommendations adopted by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council on December 7, 1979 for the Motorola DR!. The enclosed report and recommendations represent the fulfillment of the Council's responsibilities as provided for in Chapter 330.05(3). Florida Statutes. ' Upon revielv of the report and recommendations. sho"uld you feel that the Council staff can be of any further assistance, please contact me at your convenience. I look for in of the fonvard to receipt of the City's adopted Development Order, as provided Chapter 380.07, Florida Statutes. In turn, the City will be notified action taken by Council' upon the Development Order's review. Yours truly, ~~(. <:::.-J . Sam Shannon Executive Director SS:cs Attachment cc: Carmen Annunziato Scott Benyon Ned Brooke Peter Cheney John Gesbocker Norman Gregory Linda Haunert Bruce Johnson r~ary Lou Lackey Stan Redick James Scully Alex Sokolik Cha r 1 es I-I a 1 ker Tom I,a 1 ker James White Bob Wi 11 i amson \ "-. '\..~ ': ?~~ ,"',a tnom<:lS j. hi99:ns che,;r:nnn lU.W. sic;bert..jr. ..~-c~ ch"im'lOtt SO ~i"r:Jrcd st. ~ p.o. 00;: 2395 stuu~. n?~~~O 33.;,;.94 9~"'2~ (30 5_l~_~~~~_~_~ cd'JJard n. glvd,,!cr ~ en et~'V, "t rc (I ~u ,cr SQm ~;':)r:non erco..trve diredor .. i , . , @ IJJ~,CJ 0 R-o;rlllVED t '-.J J-;-~ FES :> )CJlJ'J PLANh\l~G Df.\;' L ----- MOTOROLA INC. - January 30, 1985 Mr. Sam Shannon Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 620 South Dixie Highway P.Q, Drawer 396 Stuart, Florida 33495-0396 Dear Mr. Shannon: Attached is a status report on each of the conditions and commitments for Motorola's DRI in Boynton Beach. This report shows that we are in full compliance with all requirements. Also attached is a list of all permits and approvals obtained by Motorola in conjunction with the project. I am enclosing two copies of the current master plan--one to be sent to Tallahassee and one for your files. Please, advise if you need any additional information or documentation. Sincerely, LYCv~ ~ Mary Lou Lackey Regional Director State Relations MLL/dt Attachment cc: Mr. Carmen Annunziato, City of Boynton Beach Mr. Jerry Leonard, Motorola Ms. Linda Monroe, TCRPC Mr, Bill Zuknick, Motorola Paging DiVision 1500 N W 22nd Avenue, Boynton Beach. Florida 33436. 1305) 738-2000 .~.('t:i"-, "STATE'OFFL;;;'D~"1 ~'C? A~~:. .' DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTA~ AEGULATION . SOUTH FLOR IDA SUBDISTRICT ~l c l~ k ~ ~h~ 1 _;\ .>, . I'; 0_'" I BOB ORA" GOVEAt ;Y-~TORIA .. TSCH,N '. SECReT, l:; WARREN.G. STA.t SUeD ISTA ICT MANAi 3301 GUN CL,.UB ROAD P.O. BOX 3858 WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33402 I . ! ! .' December 17, 1981 . AP - Palm Beach County Motorola - Complex Source Boynton Beach Mr. Mike Halleman Heery and Heery 880 West Peachtree Street, Northwest Atlanta, GA 30367 I i Dear Mr. Halleman: ... Please be advised that as of August 27, 1981, the Complex Source Rule 17-2.05(8), Florida Administrative Code, was officially removed from'Department regulations. Since the Complex Source rule is presently not in effect, expired Motorola Complex Source permit need not be renewed. If there are any further questions please contact Mr. I. Goldman of this office 305/689-5800. Sincerely, , LJL' C f{~L -'-- ~C~ Wi~liams' Section Head Air/Industrial Waste/Solid Waste JCW:i~. cc: Palm Beach County Health Department v Protecting Florida and Your Ouality of Life ~ A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR @ [MJ@u@~@[L& City of Boynton Beach Palm Beach County I I I I I I I I DECEMBER 1979 TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL ~ -'~'----~...__._..,_._-_..._----_.._------ The proposed Motorola site is a portion of a previously approved development called Sandhill. Riteco Development Corporation, the developer of Sandhill, had planned a commercial tract and five multifamily parcels for the Motorola site. These uses were projected to generate 12,685 trips per day, only 335 trips less than Motorola's projected 13,020. In contrast, the Sandhill plan was projected to generate 2,682 peak hour trips, over 1,000 more than the 1,634 projected for Motorola. It appears that the Motorola project will actually have a lesser impact on surrounding roadways than the existi'ng approved plan. In order to mitigate the projected traffic impacts of the entire Sandhill project, Riteco Corporation agreed (See Appendix 31-B at the end of section) to provide the following highway improvements (or payment in lieu thereof): four-laning of Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue along Riteco's entire frontage ($137,000 and $600,000, respectively); dedication of rights-of-way on Congress and N.W. 22nd of 120 and 108 feet, respectively; signalizing the intersections of N.W. 22nd Avenue with Congress, Seacrest and any project roadways, ~/here warranted ($50,000 for Congress and Seacrest); left turn lanes on the east and west approaches to the intersection of N.W. 22nd Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard" ($12,000); and construction of the intersection of Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue for 500 feet north, south, and east of the intersection ($60,000). The payments total $859,000; however, $600,000 of that total is for four-laning N.W. 22nd Avenue, which is projected not to be needed by the Motorola ADA. Most of the improvements are timed to occur when a specified number of units are occupied or an associated number of daily trips are generated (generally 5;600 trips, except for four-laning N.H. 22nd, which \'/ould occur at 11,199 trips). Similar agreements have been mtde with several other developers in the area. The result, as shown in Exhibit 31.6, is that a significant length of Congress Avenue, behleen Hypoluxo and Boynton Road, has commitments to four-laning by developers. In each case, the commitment does not have to be met until the particular project passes a specified threshold. Further, provision is made for the developer to reimburse government if it should undertake the widening of Congress before the project crosses its threshold. The projection that Congress will be four lanes by 1990 is based primarily on these COl$litments. Hm'lever, these commitments do not provide a rel iable projection of timing. Given the uncertainties of the development process, it is impossible to determine when the various improvements will be provided. A possible additional contribution that might be made to expanding highway capacity would be Motorola's contribution to the County's fair share road impact fee. However, that fee was suspended on November 13 and is scheduled to be reviewed in March 1980. Since Motorola hopes to break ground befol-e then. it would likely not pay the impact fee on Phase I, even if the fee is eventually reinstated. If the fee is reinstated, Notorola would pay a total fee of $118,650 for Phases II and III, based on the ordinance's current rate of S12.50/trip. ," Another ;;otential mitigating factor may result from effol-ts cUI-rently under I-lay by the clarida Department of Commerce to secure 52,000,000 in State monies for the pUl-pose of four-l aning Cor.gress Avenue fl'om Boynton Road north\'Jard to the '-"." -.- - --~--_.- ..- .--';--" -- - - -- ..-. --. .-.' - . ,... - , ' . -,-'~"'"'-' . .--" -.+- ---- - - ,-.. - - . ...._, __"0"_ _._. __"'.-'"+'> ~ ". _h ..- _ -. -. - .,". - --. 31- 11 I I I I f I I ~ n 3 .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 u '. < ~ . :! ) DEVELOPER COtl,1m1EN S FOR FOUR-LANHf CONGRESS AVENUE _ ' ------------- . l-r . " .. I u,..~." 1 " I I .r J . ' J .J -J. en' " I .;.. l-- ,- ...- . .... =< co .>- > '" < .... ::; Sf I I J I + HY?OlU;:::O ~I Boynton ~akes I f1ecdo'tls "",/1 300 ~, R..../.2 . '/== .- : c;.-",'."\ . ".->; . ~"'T'-=' Scndhi1l hx~~: ,..- tl ~.:'.:.,.s: '. ... o 5 ~ c: '" ~ DeBartolo 5 .... I'la 11 -;>2 eOYHTO~~ ?Q. Ih- I I ~ I I -I' I I 1 I . J ----------t I I J I 5,\'/. :;03 , ~l____fi-.I II -;-:-:-:; ~. ':Z"-. ,...., '_:- . I. .\ 1\\ !::l ~j '~7J~'O'R'D7 00 ., . \ '.-.,j. r '" . r.~~ ,: I ;.. \:_ . tl -..7. ....~. ~/...... .: _ .'_ ...._..;.-""": ; . / ( \ I .~ ........_../ ~(10" (.;=:.....>1 P.......,~:=:~....cO\J...~'i.r:..c~.::"'. TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT 31.6 w '" 0:: '" c: => l-- < o co o --' .... -t---'-- -- -- I I I i I I I I I I I I I J I I I 1 I J-____~____~ . . 0 .;.;i:JIt:=,"'......Cj; ___ P;l!I\oI4"" '..........CT J,R!!.Iio SOURCE: P/l.U: BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC ENGINEERS OFFICE . . ~-<-- . i I Ii I I I I . L__+ J .. -.. -' >- ., '" c:: c "" w ., I - J 1 J I 1 I I J I I 1 -T -I S.W.15 O~V::lO?;.~~:-';T O~ ::::=-':'G:-:_;~- ~~~~?;..~~_:.-_>. _: --.~'''-:~~~~;.. ~-~ ~~_~:~~~ 1"':::;:;'-: s -!~;=.. r: ~ ~,:~~~;~:{.~~~~.~~:~~~~~:~.~~z~.'. ,"-:'-._-~-'" 31-11a . .. -.---.--- ..---.,----.,.......:>0.: /1~ October 11, 1979 Mr. Sam Shannon, Executive Director Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 50 Kindred Street P. O. Box 2395 Stuart, Florida 33494 HEERY RE: Motorola Manufacturing, Development & Administrative Facility City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida Dear Mr. Shannon: To meet sufficiency requirements of the Motorola DRI-ADA dated October 1, please accept the following information: 1. Pages I-I, 1-1, and 6-1 revised to read Comprehensive Development... 2. Letters of commitment: a. Exhibit 21 D-2 wastewater, water, solid waste b. Exhibit 25 A-2 Electric Power c. Exhibit 24 A-3 Industrial Waste 3. Page 20-13; question 20 K 4. Maps J-l through J-9 with titles, maps J-4, J-5, J-6 with additional traffic counts. And maps J-7, J-8, J-9. Renumbered to correlate to Phases I, II & III 5. Pages 31-6 revised to include additional peak hour traffic 6. Appendix Exhibit D 7. Exhibit E Additional information pursuant to S.F.W.M. questions If any further information is required please do not hesitate to call upon us. Very truly yours, JBG/ks cc: T. McDougall ~l. Lackey F. Hilton Heery & Heery, Architects & Engineers. Inc, 880 West Peachtree Street, NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30309.Telephone (404) 881-9880fTelex 54-2165 October 1, 1979 HEERY Mr. Sam Shannon, Executive Director Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 50 Kindred Street P. O. Box 2395 Stuart, Florida 33494 RE: Motorola Manufacturing, Development & Administrative Facility City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida Dear Mr. Shannon: As the authorized representative of Motorola, Inc., we hereby propose on their behalf to undertake a Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact as defined in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 22F-2.05 and 22F-2.07, Florida Administrative Code. In support thereof, we are pleased to submit the enclosed Application for Development Approval for this Motorola project which is proposed to be located within the jurisdictional limits of Boynton Beach, Florida. Our submission consists of the following elements and we hereby certify, to the best of our knowledge and belief, that the information contained therein is true and correct: 1. The Application for Development Approval of a Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact. 2. Separate visual exhibits at full scale. 3. Filing fee check in the amount of $10,000. If any additional information is required pursuant to this application, please advise us at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, HEERY, ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, INC. f2c; B. Gesbocker, AlA JBG:sg Enclosures Revised Oct. 11, 1979 I-I Heery & Heery, Architects & Engineers, Inc, 880 West PeachtreeStreel. NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30309,Telephone [404) 881-9880/Telex 54-2165 }'i. J t~ t S~l; r- t T J ~} f~ ~) J I ')')'" {..-',,\ J -I i ',0::0 1\' "i -; ') / \, It ') 5/ \'1 I.',',"; !:~?Lc~~,_~l-:.~,_r~!~(' ~ I, I, . E~;Lir;o.-~ti:d CI121.;:).'teri,',>t".ic!> b L__~.i.~2:;.~. i, ' Ie, li ~ r: II F l. 0 "~ E N T " i /.'.:erZ',:.',e -, - '2' , ~,:l i. i t 3, ~;h 'j rL 'J(,)',\L I, , i 1..\ .. . iI'" " c, -.-.. 1 (, L (;1,) J GfJ() 3 c, ~~ ;:.; :U,,i UJ ? (J,~\ 5",:/1 Jj~j J/H :-{f)r)j 7H! '; I, , , ;l/ ! ! t ! ~ :,1 (J ')} 2/1 , 'I') /?I l,C)"O 1 j 3 /11 ! I., ~ ", :! n i " " " 1\ , c-\C(,:n I' 0., nit_ r~ t, ii '"'" f^ '.. l. Il;~ >- ~. r' P, I' _~. !l'" ,...~:,:' "", '.;~ Ijo;~ llI>ll ~{ r, ~, f k. !Iii rJ. I Eo, "~" HO..!=.2E~l~nc ~ !~~~~lated Di~;t;}~c from ELl.'JloY2e_~ J~~,--~~:.~o Exist iE_t; Pl0:~1tati.on F2.ci_lity, Hi lcs Cttmulative Percent 1~5 ') 6,6 27,2 35.0 37,3 37.3 t,5.3 59.7 70.7 75.1; eO,7 3 4 5 6 7 8 ~ }O 11 811. !, 12 l'j }I; 1 'J E; ~I. ~l 9U. i 9?2 92. !1 :.',1 9Cl.3 '), ,) 97.5 'C-'-:r=OI"A }"" - ~ ~ , : ',r. I rc. 50 r, i 0" ~: t l1 l~:'n.r >'!'] il:" li~;C" @iA\ , ",A ('v \ 'II ".'::::" -_. _ .. ,--!.F~7 ;f- ~ r"!~r- j ;' 'J i ./ R ";'7'"'/) II" I '.",. - -' JU/.;., I !'~":~~'ih~1 - dIJ' . " ' . L] /.., . ~~~--~..~ v -.............---:::...,......... .J;cdtir)n~ COrnrnUT Produc:s. Divisil:n '- =>r 21, No V~El~Jt;;; 1979 ~ . . ');.1'0(' tor: " F'Xl~Cllt lVt' 1 ',~ " Cuunc i1 ",1 SI\':'~tl:1( I, . 1 Plni:lrLLn" H'~f; \,U[1:1. '-.' '.:ll,-L,t t T, ,1 t \'<3 S l :t't'I' '... 239', Flnl-t r.: t 1]/+9l~ ~; '!ll: "1)10.'::; . 0,..-1,-1 i tio~21 ' . 'h CCJnt~ll':1 "'"'-'~ -,c1 '-'f \.f]l( r('C'Jest.: c~. ", "ty 3.'3 J. file Lll _ jnfoym:tt"i.ofi the l~~l'_ct-~n~; (ill or, .ct <J rf' I'tti.,' f '.~,\ II ~ rl i: .'!. < J _. r- 1 (, ;()\',- 'I ; 1, ~ ,111 '1'1"_ ~ ':.: i ~; ~. , > j I t r, , ",' c [',I:.-ieU I"" , ifJ/'l. -~; t , ~ ~ . l r, r" (1 j ! ~_ :_li~ I ~; ii' (':, t ll~1<L t '_ '1~;~; or ' . of 1.:10 ~.l'cl f'~ :;1 ~.OT I~ 1~ [. ~: l P it 'r. l(' (~ ! ; 'y t r" Chl' llcoj(.('t. .,-] \./ i r II P:; t 1;::1, ~c it '- f ( !- r:' ,'j ns l~ 1 \,:l '.\; } 1 (, con t.." ~ C,' 1 I l,J,).. "''') 11 ' , .' l~: "j ,.'it ,L I (in f. ,. I _ (, I C',,"'_,L'it i'.'c.'. 's ;, Ii...' - -, 1 c1i r; t (ill" r>~' t ; ;',n 1.~. '- tr12 -~. f'~ci1 i.'-:,', fror:: tile: c: \,-.:1' 'r; A1.1 1 i': , , r' ,.,d '11 ~ ~' r' : " ", ,:.l,l i r 11 f ~ t l.cl;l , ill. '-' l' ~- , ,l ;,: ~15;C:' f ('f.l f rl'€.: t., S" ,,';'dy, I n lJ(.0\.u L01r---l0-C_U"l /\) :.v:: i ].,uU"" '. ", J< '11:-1',,,,,1' 1', . i 1i t Y '.'i I"J in::', -':1 t ~; : f !(' l' [ ~ '. ' ~ ; , : r.,...J ]1\ It , '" (i I' ! ~ I , ~. t. ill) , i . I .1' ,,',1 1 STATEMENT OF INTENT We, Beery & Beery, Architects & Engineers, Inc., the authorized representative of MOTOROLA, INC., hereby propose to undertake a Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact as defined in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 22F-2.0S and 22F-2.07, Florida Administrative Code. In support whereof we submit the following infor- mation concerning MOTOROLA MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITY, which information is true and correct to the best of our knowledge. HEERY & HEERY, ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, INC. (Date) John B. Gesbocker, AlA Authorized Representative Oc,-: 1, \Q7Cf STATE OF GEORGIA COUNTY OF FULTON Before me personally appeared John B. Gesbocker to me well knolffi and known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to and before me that he executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official seal, this day of rQa~ , A.D., 1979. - r,' J1:.)/~Lv:z. ~Jlj/ . Notary PUbli~ State of Georgia at Large .; \ \, ., (: My commission expires: RotaI)' M1Ie, ~ irla!. et \:IIIIlI l>Iy Comml..IClII ElqIllM JII1y 31, 1981 Revised Oct. 11, 1979 '/ \ 1-1 6 TYPE AND SIZE OF DEVELOPMENT The project is a comprehensive development conta1n1ng a light industrial facility and related offices in accordance with the Florida Administrative Code, Chapters 22F-2.05 and 22F-2.07. The site has approximately 90 acres on which an ultimate 625,000 square feet facility will house light manufacturing and associated engineering offices. In addition, four auxiliary office buildings of 50,000 square feet each are planned. 6-1 Revised Oct. ll, 1979 ~.- w..... - - , TRANSPORTATION LOCATION MAP w '" a: z II: ::J I- ., o ir o ~ u. l' --- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---------4 ~ " II: .... >- II: < I- :; :E L.---------t I I I I + HYPOLUXO LANT AN" w o z W II: ;: ., ~ BOYNTON RD. ----------t I I I t- ___ PR1M...RY IMPACT ARE'" . INTERCHANGE @ ~~~~~~~:' U) (/) W II: '" Z o o S.W. 23 ____/J DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT HEEAY' HEfAY .e<;~..~"""""" POST. BUCKLEY, SCHUH a. JERNIGAN _.."'.-......_...I....~,..... O.GIUlIAN, SPELLACY,' MEYER ".......1;00<............ __!<:EV~S:::O 10-11-79 on '" 1. +-- I I I I I I -T I .... U) W II: o ., w U) I I I L_--t I I I I I I I I I I I I I -+ S.W. 15 MAP J-1 SHEET 11-19 ~..- w ..... - ,- TRANSPORTATION EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS ------- --------- I I I I I I 1'--- ---------4 I I I I I w '" a: z II: ::J .... ., Q II: o ~ u. ~ " II: .... >- 0: ., I- :; " JLANfa L.---------t I I I I + ___ PRIr.4"RY IMPACT ARE" . INTERCHANGE @ ~~:~~~~~A LANTANA 2 ~"N(. HYPOLUXQ 'LAN w o z W II: ;<. ., ~ U) U) W II: '" Z o o BOYNTON RD. \,."..1:8 . L...NE8DIVIDfD ----t I I I t- DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT HEERva HEERY ._""c<I..""....... POST, BUCKLEY. SCHUH l JERNIGAN ......."'._'1._........._'''''''.........." O,GIULlAN. SPELLACY, l MEYER ......CI<>'<hO.'...." tlIVIO[D on '" 1. , I ~ . ! I- U) W II: o ., w U) 5 lANE. +-- I I I I a LANE' 'LANE. ru::VIS2D 10-11-79 -T I I I I L_--t I I I I I I I I I I I I I -+ s.w. 15 MAP J-2 SHEET 11-20 ,,~ (4'2'0) .. -' " (560) W 6600 " 0 II: Z U) .... W U) II: W I- >- ;: II: U) II: ., '" ." W ., ~ Z II: l- ." 0 leota) ." 0 :; (160) 1I1l00 (1730) ." ., :; ." 2100 0 (1870) W (UD) 20(100 U) 7900 22000 ~.- W..... - - , TRANSPORTATION 1979 A VG. DAILY 1'-- I I I I I I - -------- w '" a: z II: ::J I- ., c ir o ~ u. " (310) seoo L._ TR FFIC ------- w -- --02;0') LANTANA. "700 I I I I I I -4 nOD (680) " 11500 (610) " ." (4751 5600 HYPOLUXD 1.28 (1180) 1200 BOYNTON RD. -t I I I I + 10400 (8815) 1.0" ,,= (4120) .82~ 1. ." (1130) 13300 -------- --t I I I t- S.W. 23 "" ! (".~g) , ____ ...J. ___ PRIMARY IMPACT AREA . INTERCHANGE 0000 IIHll AVERAGE DAl.Y TRAFfIC (000) PM PEAK HOUR 0.00 - ADf vOLUME/CAP"CITY RATIO @ ~~?:~~c:~:' DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT HEEFlY I. HEERY POST. BUCKLE~.SC~L;H'iJERNfG"N '"..."'._...M............""~,_.. OiGIULlAN. SPELLACY, & MEYER .._~'..... REVIS:;P 10-11-79 ,,= (42401 ." 1'-- I I I I (1~~~1 20900 I I -T I ... (1425) HIOOO '" 1(14110) 18100 I I I L_--t I ." (180) "00 I I I , I I I I I I I I -+ S.W. 15 ." (8",0) "00 MAP J-3 SHEET 11-21 ~.- \..U ..... - - , TRANSPORTATION 1981 AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC 1'-- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I -4 w '" a: z II: ::J .... ., o a: o ~ u. ~ " II: .... >- II: ;: Dilll :; ~ ::0:0 0,'" n (10) 4100 L.___ -t 1 I I I + 0.1, n 12.21 1000 LANTANA ROA 1.10 n ,\1111 11100 0." n .l!.."' .UIIO HYPOLUXO ROA 1""01 ...., (,.", '... w 0 Z U) w II: U) ;: w ...,... II: '" o.n '" \.11 n ~ n Z \,'0"1 nO) 0 '0100 1400 0 0.1' ." (I..) 2UOO BOYNTON RD. 1.~1. n uu "10 11." (:~:). IUOO on '" 1. U,tl 0." m '1(2) .4100f --t I I I t- -------- ___..RI......R't' IMPACT #lRE" . INTEFtCHANGE 0000 (ODD) Tt1ROUGH TR...FFIC IolOTOROLA TAAFFIC OL .ANTlCIPATED LANEAOE 0.00 AOT VOLU..E/C...,....ClTy R..nO @ ~C:::~R::::~A 0." " J'P.f) "00 sW. 23 ____/J TOTAL TR"''''FIC DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT I-fEERY" /-lEERy POST, 8UCic.~sCH"UH'i JERNIGAN """''''0_''.__-'''-'' OOIULIAN, SPEtu..cy... MEYER --- .. _REVISI.:JLJQ-IL-J..9__ -T I 1.11 n CtlII 17000 0.71 n (UgJ "200 ,I." " I"" lnoo 11.17 " IC701 17700 I I I L_--t I 0.'1 m 1.100 0.' (.i~ ... I J I I I I I I I I I I -t D.n n fUll, .7000 I- U) W II: Di'l' ~ Inl w ,..00 (f) +- I I I I 0." " f.OI tUOO S.W. 15 I I 1.01 " I''') H"o-Q MAP J-4 SHEET11-22 ~.- w..... - TRANSPORTATION 1990 A VG. DAILY w '" 0: z a; ::J I- ., o ir o ~ U- 1- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --- -- --- " '" IU) 1.00)0 L.____ ---- - . -t I I I I + INTERCHANGE TRAFFIC I I I I I -4 -" " a; I- >- II: ., I- :; :E G." '" tlO} 22000 ---- ..n " '.2" ,~.oo 0.27 '" uo.) 1000 w o z W II: ;: ., ~ 0." '" --~m LANTANA 00"00 '.n '" (Uat' 20.00 HYPOLUXa RO l,nl11 ... ,n " CIO) uoo U) U) W 0:: ..0.... C) 1."" Z HO o (un) o ~..oo 1.'7 '" (U.2) ...00 BOYNTON RD. .1000 U.41 .CO ',10 t.'1 m (UU\"';- IUD6) -'- (1"'1 0.'" '" (I'D) ,uoo --t I I I ~ -------- . ___ PRIMAR'l' IMPACT AREA @ ~~~c::::c:~:' " 0.00 THROUGH TR...FflC ] TOTAL TRAFFIC MOTOROLA TRAFFIC ....NTlCIP...TEO lANEAGE ADT VOLUt.4E/CAPACITY RATIO 0000 (ODD) SW. 23 :~::~ _ _ _/.1 " ..12 '.00 m 71"00 I." m It.'" '2000 0.1' '" (,u.) llaoo DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT HEERY & HEERY POST, BucKm.5cHLi~'&JERNIG"N ......."'.-"._....,....~...-......... DiGIULlAN. SPELLACY, & MEYER ,..............'-'" R;oVISEg~O-11-79 -T I I I I 10.7. '" I (.U) 1121i0 O.TI '" (no) nooo I I I L_--t I ,..''Io o.rl " (un; 120G .... U) W II: 'r?L' ~ 21;;:~ ~ +- I I I I ... n IBOI 10100 I I t.1t " 1,..1 12700 0... .. ISU) ..00 I I I I I I I I I I I I -+ s.W. 15 MAP J-5 SHEET 11-23 ~.- \.lJ ..... - - , TRANSPORTATION 2000 A VG. DAIL Y w '" a: z II: ::J I- ., o ii: o ~ u. 1'-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J I t... ." IUD) ITOO L._ TRAFFIC I I I I I I -4 ~ " II: .... >- II: ., I- :; :E LT. '" (OlD) .,BOo -t I I I I -I- ___ PRIMARY IMPACT "REA . INTERCHANGE ,.. " (11021 "'00 0..' ... llllU' f~.ao w o z W II: ;: :5 ',.. " 1101 "'~OD BOYNTON RD. 0000 (OOOl " 0.00 THROUGH TRAFFIC 1 lOTAl TRAFFIC MOTOROLA TRAFFIC "NTlCI"ATEO LANEAQE Aor YOLUI.lEfCAPACITY RATIO @ ~r:.::~~~~ LANTANA ROA .. '" ,.a2I, naoo t.ll '" (I1Z) z..aa HYPOLUXO ROA ,aO'.l ..... N.W. l.a '" 111800 U) U) W II: '" Z o o "t.l'll I.U '" (86.0) '.'00 1."" '" {Iun 10100 I.DB uo ('UIl '.'00 1.111 m ,(~:;:~ 1. Ilia 0..7 '" f/lUI UDOO --t I I I t- Ii': I ::;~L I S.W. 23 ____/1 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT HEERY I HEERY POST, BUCKTeY."'sei..iu-;;"lJEANIGAN '-."'.-,............-.......,............ DiGIULIAN. $PELLACY,' MEYEFl ,......----,- RI.;VISED 10-11-79 0... ". (22UI 11000 1.'0 no (....) lUIOO .... U) W II: 1..' 0 " ., (Uf) UJ uuo CI) 1'- I I I I -T I I I I I D.n ... I tno) ""0 I I I L_--t I ..~ 0.'7 " (UOI' 8'00 0.10 " IUD) 1000 0." " (..i" 'UDO 1.1' " 1210) 14100 0.71 no ''''11 IUOO I I I I I I I I I I I I -+ s.w. 15 MAP J-6 SHEET 11-24 TRANSPORA TION PHASE I 1981 PEAK ~ = -------, f. PL , ~. ... WI.- - 4-5 p.m. TRAFFIC SITE ACCESS ,.. TC I( "IIiDIU (,..) I( (5) un '"' CONGR:ES9 AT WEST BOVNTO.. (N.W. 2/110) \1/ ... ". - j,t ( 2..(4) (..I) N.W. 22 AVENUE W ::J Z W > '" U) U) w II: '" '" o " ~ l.....E. . < , lANEI L 0000 - Tf.lROUGf1 TRAFFIC (000) - MOTOROLA TR"FFIC @ ~~~c::~~~:' 2lANEI . . : \ \ ) I I ..~ N.W. 22 AT 8fACREST DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT HEERya HEERY ._'...CT.............. POST. BUCKLEY, SCHUH" JERNIGAN ......."'._.u.............."'-........... OiGIULlAN. SPEll.ACY." MEYER ........,...."..,- Re\!I ":'\) 1 0-11 - 79 MAP J-7 SHEET 11-27 UtI UlII ''I' \.. w :0 3 LANElI Z W > t ( ., U) "'0 U) ""71 (II) W II: '" Z 0 0 0 . 0 ; . . 3 L"NElI I . < I , ( L___ _ ----1 ~,- W ..... - TRANSPORTATION PHASE " ~99 4-5 p.m. PEAK H II TRAFFIC ~ + SITE ACCES CONGRESS AT WEST BOYNTON (N.W. 2ND) - (U) (II ~. ." ... JP... "Jf ,,- ", N.W. 22 AVENUE 0000 THROUGH TR"FFrc (0001 MOTOROLA TRAFFIC (U) 1 uo-" fl'lto__ l~:l' 'i( (44)(1'01 - DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT HEERY" HEERY @ ~~~~~~~~A .OIO<~"__""" POST. BUCl':lEY. SCHUH l JERNIGAN D~~~iAN~SPELU:ctl~'EY"'ER .--.....,..... R::V.~ED 10-11-79 (11) N.W. 22 AT SEACREST MAP J-8 SHEET 11-25 ~.- \.lJ I.- - TRANSPORTATION PHASE III 20~~ 4-5 p.m. PEAK Ht TRAFFIC + SITE ACCESS PLA - . ~ , UfO I "("( ~ 2: ~IO' W > "" fl01 U) S L"NEI U) W II: t ( '" z 0 I:UI 0 0 14.0 0 telt31l > j ~ . . . < . LANEI I r ....~{.IJJ (30) N.W. 22 AVENUE DODO THAOUGH TI=\AFFIC (000) ,,",OTOROLA TRAFFIC . . L....US DIVIDED AJlI !HOWN IfCAUlf OF THE ANTICIPATED 1R...'''le VOLU.... ON 1;:0"0"(" AVENUE COIITI'I"RY TO THE YEAR 1000 CO'T 'E....,.LE TR"....,.ORT...TlON 'lA" CONGRESS AT WEST 80v"'TON (N.W. 2ND) @ ~~~~~~L~:' r- . . \ \ I -~ DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT HEE.AY 6. HEEAY POST. BUCK.~CHUH'iJERN1G"'N ........o(.._...............~'......-'..... OiGIULlAN, SPELLACY." MEYER 1._"'"""'......... REVISED 10-11-79 N."'. 22 AT SEACREST ....-:--. MAP J-9 SHEET 11-26 Question 20K Estimate the capital improvement cost that will be borne by the local government for installation of all public facilities and transportation improvements not provided by the developer. Answer 20K Judging from information in Exhibit 21D-2 (utility commitments from the City of Boynton Beach), the E.P.A. will be funding water and sewer improvements in the Motorola Project area, thereby relieving the city of any capital improvement costs pursuant to these utilities. Transportation roadway improvements thru the year 2000 are already planned within the impact area to handle anticipated growth (see Question 31). These costs are indeterminate related to ~~torola's site but will not, we are told, be borne by the City of Boynton Beach, It is anticipated that other developers in the area will be contributing to the costs of inter- change construction and signalization at N.W. 22nd and Congress Avenues. We have also been informed that there is the possibility of some joint State/County funding of roadway improvements along Congress Avenue. Motorola has agreed to inherit from the Seller, Riteco Development Corporation, some of their previous commitments for roadway improvements along N.W. 22nd Avenue. 20-13 Revised Oct. 11, 1979 CITY of BOYNTON BEACH ~ P. O. BOX 310 120 N.E. 2ND AVENUE. BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA :'343~ (3051 732-8111 Office of the City Manager October 1, 1979 Ii~. John B. Gesbocker, AIA Heery & Heery, Architects & Engineers, Inc. 880 West Peachtree Street, N. W. Atlanta, Georgia 30309 OCT 3 12--') Re: Motorola Development Dear Mr. Gesbocker: I have received requests for information relative to Motorola's potential development in Boynton Beach and their DR! application. The infonnation requested in your letter to me included the areas of water supply and solid waste. I have also received a copy of the letter you wrote to Mr. Paul Startzman of the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board, and a separate request for infonnation from our R:>lice Department.. In regard to the matters of water supply, solid waste and sanitary sewer, it is appropriate to consider the City's current Comprehensive Plan and its statements concerning the City's development. The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Boynton Beach was adopted by the City Council on August 21, 1979. Two of the required elements of the plan are Future Land Use and Master Sewer and Water Facilities. In the very early stages of plan preparation, estimates of development were provided for use in determining the grid system of water distribution lines and sewage collec- tion force mains and pumping stations necessary to serve the proposed land development. The resulting grid system is graphically presented in the two plates accompanying this letter. Additionally, improvements to the system have been programmed in and are compiled in the capital needs list of the Comprehensive Plan. A. Water and Sanitary Sewer: The City presently has adequate capacity to serve Motorola Development, as we have a Master Plan for water treatment, water transmission and sewerage collec- tion facilities. These facilities have been designed to adequately meet all the requirements of the entire service area, which Boynton Beach is committed to serve under the original Water Quality f.'.anagement Plan. This plan was con- cei ved and originally based on the densities higher than is now being allowed REVISED 10-11-79 SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL W ASTEW A TER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL BOARD BOARD 339 E. ATLANTIC AVENUE . DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 P.O. BOX Q ~ - ,'I I CITY COUNCil.. MCMBER. 0" 80YN1'ON 81:ACH & DELRAY BIIACH October I, 1979 .J Heery and Heery Architects and Engineers, Inc. 880 W. Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309 OCT 4 1979 Att: Mr. Jom B Gesbocker, AIA Dear Sirs: In response to your info:rrrative letter of Septerrber 20, 1979, requesting certain wastewater treatIrent and disposal capacity info:rrration be rmde available to your client, !>btorola, Inc., please be advised as follows: 1. Presently constructed plant capacity is 12 M.G.D. (designed)of which 3 M.G.D. is- anticipated to be excess capacity throug.l-t the year 1981. A 4 M. G.D. expansion is plmmed to COIre on stream about 1987 which will provide adequate capacity through the year 2000. Transmission facilities are a responsibility of the City of Boynton Beach but every assurance is had that transmission facilities will be available and of adequate capacity to serve !>btorola I S requirements. (Please see attached = from the Director of Utilities, Boynton Beach.) 2. No corrmitIrents for treatIrent capacity are rmde to any agency or user, how- ever the Interlocal AgreeIrent between Delray Beach and Boynton Beach conceTIling the basic considerations of joint ownership specifically require expansion of capacity planning to be initiated at the 75% point and completed plmming nust have been accomplished by the Board and submitted to the City Councils for approval by the t:iJre the plant has reached 85% of the overall design capacity of the last expansion increJreIlt, thus reasonable assurance of ample capacity is obtained. 3. The E.P.A. 201 Study and Plan for the Region has been. completed, approved and is being vigorously implerrented. There is nothing forseeable which could imperil the ability to continue servicing the !>btorola facility adequately during and after development. If we can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, .'1 ~/I. ! ('tt:.<.-P J/ 'YI~~Xca:~ Pau H. Startzman Interim 1Idmin:\:sr-rative . rector South Central Regional Wastewater TreatrJEnt and Disposal Board PHS/rrgr REVISED 10-11-79 Page 2 Mr. John B. Gesbocker, AlA, Heery & Heery, Architects 8. Engineers, Inc. Re: Motorola Development October 1, 1979 in the area of service. The program includes major transmission lines, additional wells, added storage capacity, and ultimately, another water treatment plant and well field. All of this .is set up on an orderly basis to meet anticipated growth. as it develops in the area. There is a major transmission line presently at Congress Avenue and SR 804, which is projected to be extended northward past Motorola property, with adequate capacity to serve Motorola and all the areas along its route. The major pumping stations under Phase 1 have been EPA fUnded and are nearing completion, with anticipated operational date of approximately December 1, 1979, and certainly before January 1, 1980. These lines are also adequately designed to take care of all anticipated waste flows. Further, there is a master pump- ing station and pressUl'e line, whose route is down Congress Avenue, to carry sewage to the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. The City of Boynton Beach is on a priority list for funding from EPA for this project sometime after October 1, 1979. This will provide adequate capacity to handle not only Motorola's requirements, but also all the areas along Congress Avenue and the nothern portion of OUl' service area. At the present time, the City has an excess average water capacity of approximate- ly Two MGD. With plans for continually increasing the City's well field capacity and the recent increase in plant capacity to Sixteen MGD in the last twelve months, the City anticipates no problem in having adequate water for all the people and uses in the service area. (There have been no firm commitments of capacity of our water supply -- it is on a first-come, first-serve basis.) The City does have the ability to provide service for both water distribution and collection during and after development, because of its logical prior planning and the fact that, financially, City bonds carry an "A" rating. Further, the City maintains a qualified staff, well-trained in meeting State requirements, both at the Water Plant and other facilities of the utility operations. Pressure in our system in our lowest pressUl'e areas is in the range of 50 Ibs. minimum, and flows throughout the City exceed maximum fire flow requirements. With projected lines, it is anticipated that a similar situation would be main- tained in the area of Motorola development. B. Solid Waste Solid waste collection within the City of Boynton Beach is provided by the Sani tation Division of the Public Works Department. Currently, solid waste collected within the City is transferred to the 235 acre Lantana Road Landfill which is operated by Palm Beach County. The Lantana Landfill has a life expectancy to the year 1988 based solely on volumetric capacity. However, short term mitigating actions to control leachates and the possible addition of solid waste conversion techniques may substantially modify this life expectancy. Furthennore, as noted in the adopted Comprehensive Page 3 Mr. John B. Gesbocker, AIA, Heery & Heery, Architects & Engineers, Inc. Re: ~~torola Development October 1, 1979 Plan for the City, Boynton Beach encourages the implementation of the Palm Beach County Solid Waste Management Plan which supports initiating measures to insure the short and long term availability of adequate solid waste disposal capaci ty . C. Police Services Attached is a letter from Boynton Beach Police Chief Noah Huddleston which indicates the capability of the City in responding to the impact and needs of a development such as Motorola within the City of Boynton Beach. I hope I have included all the necessary infonnation for your completion of the DRI application. Please let me know if there is more infonnation needed and I will be glad to furnish it for you. We look forward to working with you and Motorola in the Coming months as you proceed through DR! procedures. I can assure you the City will cooperate with you in the process in every possible way. Sincerely, v~"~ Peter L. Cheney City Manager PLC :mh Att. Plans: Wastewater Master Force Main and Lift Station System Water Treatment Plant, Raw Water Wells, Storage Facilities Letter from Police Chief Noah Huddleston cc: Mr. Paul Startzman, Interim Director, SCRWTD Board Police Chief Noah Huddleston Mr. Cannen Annunziato, City Planner Mr, Perry Cessna, Director of Utilities Central Files . ~ '. . ,. ,/' ~ .......' I Peter L. Cheney city Manager september 26, 1979 page 2 Re: Letters from Heery & Heeryr Motorola property / - ! 'I ~- 't I j 2 MGD. with-our plans for continually increasing our well field capacity and the fact-that-we-have just increas~/,our-plant capa- city to 16 MGD in the last 12 months, the city antIci8ates no pro- blem in having adequate water for all of the people~in~the service area. There have been no firm commitments of capacity of our water supply -- it is on a first-come, first-serve basis. The City does have the ability to provide service for both water dis- tribution and collection during and after development, because of our logical prior planning and the fact tha~ financially, our bonds carry an "A" rating. Further, we maintain a qualified staff, well-trained in meeting State requirements, both at the Water plant and other fa- cilities of the utility operation. Pressure in our system in our lowest pressure areas is in the range of 50 lbs. minimum,and flows throughout the city exceed maximum fire flow requirements. with projected lines, it is anticipated that a similar situation would be maintained in the area of the Motorola de- velopment. Should you have any questions on the above, please do not hesitate to call me. Q Cessna of utilities PAC: br Perry Direct ~-~-_._---~..------------.......-.. _=-.......... -. ~.__ _ .~~r - -- ~p -.;~,-, _. '"'- . .....-.-'_ ,>,-_i'~~ --'..~ -- eo'( 2-10:;1, DElP.A Y B!:ACH, fl:~ ~3.j.j j EXllIIlIT 25-A2 I=Pl! FLORIDA POWER &. LIGHT COMPANY -October 5, 1979 Mr. John B. Gesbocker, AlA Heery & Heery, Architects & Engineers, Inc. 880 West Peachtree Street, N. W. Atlanta, GA 30309 RE: Motorola Inc., S/E corner of Congress Avenue & N. W. 22nd Avenue in Boynton Beach Dear Mr. Gesbocker: Thank you for your correspondence concerning the Motorola project outlining information on electrical loads and phase by phase target dates. Please be advised that Florida Power & Light Company is currently reviewing the overall impact of this facilitity on our distribution, substation and transmission facilities. It appears at this time that substantial improvements will be necessary on our distribution system along with expansion of substation facilities to accommodate the load requirements of Phase II and III as outlined in your letter. Our current 138 KV line and existing substation capacity are considered adequate to serve the existing and anticipated load in the Northern Boynton Beach area for the next three or four years; however, we are currently planning to substantially increase in our trans- mission line facilities for the year 1982. Our preliminary planning for service to Motorola indicates one new additional distribution feeder from Boynton substation and will be installed during 1980. Additional feeders will be installed from Lantana substation and Boynton substation as required to meet the expansion program outlined as Phase II and Phase III on the Motorola site. We feel that the construction as outlined above will provide a reliable source of electrical power to the Motorola project without any adverse effect to other industries and residences of Buynton Beach. I would appreciate receiving your electrical design drawings, site plans, drainage, topographic drawings etc., as soon as possible to enable us to proceed with our engineering designs. Your cooperation in providing these items will help to insure proper planning tothis most important industrial project by the dates required. If I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me. 1n~~~ J · _ ~. Cling)rC __ Power Services Representative JRC/jsd Revised 10-11-79 HELPING BUILD FLORIDA Boynton Beach Police Dept. 13~ N. E. hiT AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA 3343~ NOAH E, HUDDLESTON CHI!:'" 0" POLICE 28 September 1979 TEl.EPHONE 30:i.732-B116 Mr. Peter Cheney City Manager Boynton Beach, Florida Dear Mr. Cheney: In response to your question as to what impact Motorola will have on the Police Department by the construction of the plant in our city, will in my opinion be minimum at the present time. We are staffed presently with (69) sworn personnel, anticipa1 ing upgrading the efficiency of the department by having two more criminal investigators and putting into effect in the near future a four day a week, 10 hour a day plan for the Road Patrol, which will allow better coverage during the high crime hours. Furthermore, the Police Department is capable of h~ndling all misdemeanors and felony cases, however, we have excellent cooperation with other departments should the need arise. We have our own crime scene and identification section to work with the investigative services. Also we have an organized crime unit that works with and cooperates with all agencies, including Feder; State, and County. Although I see no immediate problems, we would have to evalu; the statistics in the future to see if there has been a greater impact than we originally anticipated. Sincerely, -,,,-' "- "- . , "'\ $F jf~/6.Z} N. E. Huddleston Chief of Police NEH/j j e ,. /. , . SEP L1) ~ :.;;:=:n!E:~ Ci~'1 r,,:,:Jn~~o"s C:;ic;) cc: File (? V:' ,c_ ~. " .,.... ~.' . ...... ' -.~~----' REVISED 10-11-79 To Serve To Protect ~~ (Cl>.~~ 8911 N.W. 8th. St. Pembroke Pines, {Cl";"~,!$.1 n Fla. 33024 - EXHIBIT 24A-3 c'~~lAL WASTE M NEFF OIIL ~ 432-1100 434-~069 j' October 9, 1979 Heery & Heery Architects & Engineers, Inc. 880 West Peach Street, N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30309 ...' Attn, Ms. Mary Lou Lackey Gentlemen: This will inform you that Neff Oil Inc. will provide service at all times, for the r~oval of certain wastes as per your request of September 20, 1979. Very truly yours, NEFF OIL IIC. /!: /(, ){y~. W.R. ~~! NRF /rmn , Revised 10/11/79 The traffic generation for the proposed manufacturing facility was de- veloped from a traffic survey taken at a similar Motorola facility in Plantation, Florida. The existing facility has 480,000 square feet of floor area and 2,550 employees on the first shift and 3,115 employees total. ~Iechanical traffic counters were placed on all the driveways to take direc- tional traffic flows. In addition to the counter, people were stationed at the driveways during the afternoon peak hours to record the number of vehicles entering and leaving the facility as well as the vehicle occupancy. The results of the survey are shown below together with published material from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Informational Report - Trip Generation. Plantation Facility Trips/Employee IrE Trips/Employee Average Weekday Peak Hour (a.m.) Peak Hour (p.m.) Peak Hour (p.m.) Observed Vehicle Occupancy 1.3 2.2 0.31 0.37(1) 0.25(2) persons/vehicle 2.01 0.44 0.39 The average weekday volumes and p.m. peak hour figures are very consistent and compare favorably wheras the a.m, peak hour is quite low. Since the ITE rates are based on various types of manufacturing plants with varying sizes of floor area and number of employees, we have used the generations rates surveyed at the Plantation facility because of the similar characteristics. Another reason to use the generation rates from the Plantation facility is the staggered shift times (which will also be used at Boynton Beach) to re- duce the impact of vehicles on the arterial street system. While the number of employees indicated on the first shift are high as a percentage of total employment, the manufacturing portion of the plant has a 7:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m, shift and the indirect labor force is from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The ratio of the work force is approximately 60 percent manufacturing and 40 percent indirect labor. The first and second phases are to be developed under these design guidelines. The third phase is proposed as an office facility complementing the manu- facturing facility. This third phase is planned to have 1,000 employees working in four buildings with a total of 200,000 square feet of floor area. The generation rates associated with this concept may be higher than the man- ufacturing indirect labor force but also well below a general office building with various types of uses. For the purposes of this study, the generation rates used are those indicated in the ITE generation report for an office park. The rates are indicated below: Office Park Trips/Employee Average Weekday Peak Hour (a.m.) Peak Hour (p.m.) 3.3 0.63 0.54 (1) Site Peak Hour 3-4 p.m. (2) Street Peak Hour 4-5 p.m. Rev. 10-11-79 31-6 EXHIBIT D GENDER DISTRIBUTION OF EMPLOYEES Pursuant to request of T.C.R.P.C. as supplemental information PHASE I II III MALE 466 1592 2276 FEllALE 1140 2828 3144 Revised 10-11-79 TOTAL 1606 4428 5420 ..... . . --lj.._.IL J' ( I I . 4. unanim sly recommended approval c the site plan for the Allstate Insurance Building at Qual.cum Park, subject to proviso. The motion was made by Mr. Collins and seconded by Mr. Howard. (PM90-33ll 5. Unanimously recommended approval of the site plan modification for Hunter's Run Clubhouse, subject to proviso. The motion was made by Mr. Lehnertz and seconded by Mr. Aguila. (PM90-332) ~'I ',_tl.!I1Approved a proposed amendment to the Zoning Code to allow restaurants and personal service establishments as conditional uses within the C-l zoning district. The motion was made by Mr. Beasley and seconded by Mr. Aguila. The vote was 4-3 in favor with Mrs. Greenhouse, Mr. Rosenstock and Mr. Howard dissenting. (PM90-333) 6. CC:frb Encs cc: Building Department C:PM90-328 . EXHIBIT E ADDITIONAL FOUR QUESTIONS FROIl THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGHlENT DISTRICT (Received by telephone from Kevin Henderson and Howard ~lliise on October 10, 1979) QUESTION No. l Bow and when will the public sanita:r>y sewer be installed to sepve this project? ANSWER No. 1 See the attached letters of commitment from the City of Boynton Beach and the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board, both dated October 1, 1979. Question No. 2 Which, if any, building j100r drains will be connected into the sanita:r>y sewer? ANSWER No. 2 The manufacturing processes of this proposed facility will not require the discharge of any toxic or industrial waste into the sanitary sewer. (See Section 24 of the DRI-ADA pursuant to Chemical Waste Generation and Disposal). The only floor drains planned for the facility will be wash-down drains in the Kitchen and Toilet Room areas, and they will be connected to the sanitary sewer after being piped through grease inter- ceptors where required. QUESTION No. :3 What is the rationale for estimating identical quantities of Water Supply and Wastewater Genepation? ANSWER No. 3 The potable water demand estimates given in the DRI-ADA are based on historical records of the existing, comparable Motorola facility in Plantation, Florida. Since there will be no industrial or manufacturing process requiring the use of water in this facility, we estimate that the Wastewater quantity will be virtually the same as the domestic Water Supply. (See Section 23 of the DRI-ADA for estimated Non-potable Water Demand in connection with the building HVAC system). REVISED 10-11-79 QUESTION No. 4 What is the sW'face drainage impaat U!est of Congress Avenue due to the=aoandonment and backfilling of existing Canal L-22? ANSWER No. 4 This potential impact was not investigated and addressed because we were informed that the Lake Worth Drainage District had pre- viously consented to the abandonment of this drainageway and had issued a quit-claim deed to the property owner. Revised 10-11-79 /D: ~c.~ c.. '!>60c..u-v ;ti:i{../l.4 .' J ,I''/o..::.J RESPOI5E TO SflmD QUESTION REGARDING OFFSITE atAINAGE T1IW CAHilL L-22 The original PUn app1icat1o.n submitted by Riteco DeveloJlllent Corp. re- quested the closure of Canal l-22. after consultation and approval from the lake Work Or~inage District. Conceptual approval of the proposed Surface Water ftan<lgt!Uent System for Sandhill PtID was than issued by UlDD and SfIIIo!O (50-OO511-R/S). Rfteco representath'es have infonned Motorola rlOpresentatives that tltey haye obtained a Quit Claim Oeed from Ulon for the subject Canal~ E:dst.ing property owners (West of Con~l"eSs Ave.) can be properly serviced by ex.istfng canals to the tlorth (l-20) and to the South (Boynton Canal). i r\!1D,OI<ol A OCT I~ 1<179 DRI PROGRESS REPORT --- QUESTIONNAIRE Development: Location (city or county): Address Motorola Manufacturing, Development & Administrative Facility City of Boynton Beach Jack Gesbocker Heery /'; Heery Architects & Engineers, Inc. 880 W. Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30309 Developer: Name Procedures: I) Regional agencies are requested to distribute to and collect questionnaires from developers and local governments, review and analyze responses, and transmit and di scuss fi ndi ngs with the Bureau of Land and Water t1anagement. 2) Developers are requested to respond to all of the questions below. 3) Local governments are requested to respond to all questions below except no 2. 4) Please add additional pages if necessary. Questions: I) Describe any changes made since the original DRI submission in the proposed plan of development, phasing, or in the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval. Please note any actions taken by local government to address these changes. 2) Provide copies of any revised master plans, incremental site plans, etc" not previously submitted to the Division. (Local Governments do not need to respond.) 3) Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the development order was issued? 4. Describe the annual development activity to date (number of dwelling units constructed, site improvements, lots sold, acres mined, gross floor area constructed, barrels of storage capacity completed, permits obtained, etc.) 5) Have any tracts of land in the development (other than individual single- family lots) been sold to a separate entity or developer? If so, identify tract and buyer. 6) Describe any lands purchased or optioned adjacent to the original DRI site subsequent to issuance of the development order. Identify such lands, describe interest obtained and identify proposed use. 7) Assess the development's and local government's continuing compliance with any conditions of approval contained in the DRI development order. 8) As a result of your experience, can you suggest any ways to improve the efficiency and/or effectiveness of the DRI Process? If so, please describe. ~ - , .. , - ..... "".~ ". .. PI.. eM ......_..... .....~...~~". ',' _ , any aonlnQ dla~r'"& au .. SU .,__~ ~ .... > , . ~o QdJocont or n..rby proP9rty o. ":ft:'~.." _.. .. .. .,~, or property thorcon. P'urthormoro. t.tw :,,:;--"e ...,:~~~~ produceion of flillnmablo or ""pIo.lvO ...."01'1:1:. .;:'-Yl')'er:''J'.~c~~''KJ conformance with the provisions of Chaptor 9 of t.ho c~ 1ft " :'l <t,;,; Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. CJ' of . ? 7. Heat, humidity, or glare. No use shall be carried Out in any zoning district so as to produce heat, humidity, or glare which is readily ~erceptible at any point at or beyond the property line of the property on which the use is located. Artificial lighting which is used to illuminate any property or use shall be directed away from any residential use which is a conforming use according to these zoning regulations, so as not to create a nuisance to such residential uses. . 8. Liquid waste. No use shall be carried out in any zoning district so as to dispose of liquid waste of any type, quantity, or manner which is not in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, or any applicable federal, state, or county laws or permits. 9. Solid waste. No use shall be carried out in any zoning district so as to allow the accumulation or disposal of solid waste which is not in conformance with Chapter 10 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, or which would cause solid waste to be transferred in any manner to adjacent or nearby property or rights-of-way.. 10. Electromagnetic interference. No use shall be carried out in any zoning district so as to create electromagnetic radiation which causes abnormal degredation of performance of any electromagnetic receptor of quality and proper design as defined by the principals and standards adopted by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, or the Electronic Industries Association. Furthermore, no use shall be carried out in any zoning district so as to cause electromagnetic radiation which does not comply with the. Federal Communications Commission regulations, or which causes objectionable electromagnetic interference with normal radio or television reception in any zoning district. Section 4: Each and every other provision of . Appendix A-Zoning, Section 4. General Provisions. A - L as previously enacted, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5: Appendix A-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, City of Boynton Beach, Florida, Section 8. M-1Industrial District Regulations and Use Provisions. A. M-1 Industrial District (1). Uses ?ermitted and (2) Uses Prohibited. are hereby repealed in their entirety. Section 6: Appendix A-Zoning. Section 8. M-l Industrial District Regulations and Use Provisions. A. M-I Industrial , District. is amended by adding a new Subsection (1). Permitted Uses No Distance Requirement. as follows: -5- .~. ',}F ";''"-......:~. .."'_i.....>::,6:~~~.~...~~.;.F_;lii~~~~::'!.~~~~ _~ '_..r-~".. ~, ....:.or-~ ~=-...... - '''.".,;' ~ . ',~ -~-~.< .~.~~-."7":..----t...~.......-.u.:.:._.1'..rl..f..''!''':'O..~~~~~...~..~''"'''.-~ o:-'T...._ ~. " . MEMORANDUM ,-~ o Peter L. Cheney City Manager D.-.Tf: September 26, 1979 , L '-ILI .ow Perry A. Cessna Director of utilities 'U'HeT Letter to You, Dated 9/20/79, from Heery & Heery for Motorola Concerning Water supply; Letter to Mr. paul Startzman, Same Dat~ Con- cernlng Se ge for Motoro a The following information should be included in your reply to the above engineers for their client, Motorola: The City presently has adequate capacity to serve Motorola Developmen~ as we have a Master plan for water treatment, water transmission and sewerage collection facilities. These facilities have been adequately designed to adequately meet all the requirements of the entire service area, which Boynton Beach is committed to serve under the original Water Quality Management plan. This plan was conceived and originally based on the densities higher than is now being allowed in the area of serv- ice. The program includes major transmission lines, additional wells, added storage capacity, and ultimately, another water treatment plant and well field. All of this ~ set up on an orderly basis to meet an- ticipated growth as it develops in the area. There is a major transmission line presently at Congress Avenue and SR804, which is projected to be extended northward past Motorola prop- erty, with adequate capacity to serve Motorola and all of the areas along its route. The major pumping stations under phase 1 have been EPA funded and are nearing completion, with anticipated operational date of approximately December 1. 1979, and certainly before January I, 1980. These lines are also adequately designed to take care of all anticipated waste flows. Further, there is a master pumping station and pressure line, whose route is down congress Avenu~ to carry sewage to' the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. The City of Boynton Beach is on a priority list for funding from EPA for this project sometime after October I, 1979. This will provide adequate capacity to handle not only Motorcla~requirements, but also ~ll of the areas along Congress Avenue and the northern portion of our service area / .Ii At the present time, 'we have an excess average, capacity cr approximately REVISED 10-11-79 SEP 5 1980 September 3, 1980 HEERY Mr. Sam Shannon, Executive Director Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council P.O. Box 2395-50 Kindred St. Stuart, Florida 33494 RE: Motorola Manufacturing Facility Boynton Beach, Florida Dear Sam: Enclosed is the response to your DRl Progress Report Questionnaire which we have completed to the best of our knowledge. Please forgive the delay in responding; it was necessary to receive prior authorization from our client, Motorola, Inc. Should you have any further questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~ &~E. RY ~/t,.t..... JohnrB..GesbOcker, AlA I F 1lr~/ da cc: Ray Ochocki Mi ke Ho 11 eman Carmen Annunizhto/ 7916a Heery & Heery, Architects & Engineers 880 West Peachtree Street, NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30309,Telephone (404) 88t-9880/Telex 54-2165 TRANSPORTATION PHASE III 20~~ 4-5 p.m. PEAK HR TRAFFIC J + SITE ACCES . . . .' , \ nTI I T"( w ::J Z W > < \ U) S LAIU:' U) W II: tr '" z 0 g::l 0 I < "'~D * I Ii)U'1 > ~ \ . . < , . l-........ t r I ,..01"") UOI "'(1 "'j\ -~ nF: ~.- WI.- - - "-U.OI -.. ,m -.... I~ ,1JM, '1""1 N.W. 22 AVENU~ ~. 0000 THROUQH TRAFFIC 10001 "'OTOROL'" T$lAFFIC . \""11 OIV'OIO "ltl 'HOWOI IU:"UII Of TO+! ....T1e'~...Tul '''..'F,e YOlUOIII Oil C;O"'''f'' AV,IIUI CD,,'ItAIIY TO THI TfA" 1000 COI' '1""llI TI"'''aI'o'nAno'' '1.,," C()HORE:lS ..,1 WEST 110'1'1\11011 eN W. :1'1010) @ ~~:::~~~~~A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT HEER'I' & HEERV .~..-....- POST, BUCKLEY. SCHUH' JEI'INIGAN -~.-<Y''''-'-~' ~.--. o.GIULL.A.N. SPEI-L..oI.CT. & MEYER ._~- R1:VI SED 10-11-79 \W~ 171"0_ - III 'r )T\.. H.~: 22 AT SEIleRE.T MAP J-g SHEET 11-26 ~,- \J.}..... - ....,. - TRANSPORTATION PHASE II. ~99 4-5 p.m. PEAK H 1/ TRAFFIC ~ + SITE ACCES CONGRESS oU WfST 80YHTON (N."". 2ND) N.W. 22 AVENUE ~ ~"'N[' , L_ DODO THROUGH TRAFFIC (ODD) 1o!0TOROlA TRAFFIC @ ~~:~~C:~~A N.W. 22 AT SEACRfST \~r- '\ \ , , I I ( -----l DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT HEER'f &. HEERY ..~..__... POST. BUCI(LEY. SCt<lUH &. JERNIGAN -.-.-....--.---- DiGIULlAN. SPELLACY. &. ME'rER ..-coc-.o.'_ D.~UJ~__---LO-_" ....n MAP J-8 120 uu 'T\... w ::J . "'4Nf. Z W > , t r ., I U) U'D U) (U7) Ul W a: '" z 0 , 0 SHEET 11-25 ~. - Wi- - 4-5 p.m. TRAFFIC SITE ACCESS 'T'( .n TC (:0"'0l'lf.55 ,\.T WEST 80"N10,,", (NW. 7HOI "" ,..--1 .- w ::J Z w :> -< U) '" w II: '" Z o o , t.1I1II1.1 . . c :I L....E. , L ," )Tc N,W. 22 AVENUE 0000 - TI-lROUGl-C TR"FFlC (0001 - IolOTOROLA TR..FFIC @ ~~::::::C::l~~ (~;~ c~,t.-. DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT HEERY I HEfRY ... ...- "" 1( IIU I'" TRANSPORA TION PHASE I 1981 PEAK ~ = ~f , I , :I ~"'NE' r- . ~ \ \ ) I I .~ .""""..~..__... POST. BUCKLEY. SCHUH I JERN1GA,N ....-".-...--...""--..-.. o.CiIUtIAN. SPELLACY." MEYER .---... .n..:JL~!~_LO....-" iQ H.W. 22 AT llEAlCREST MAP J-7 SHEET 11-27 ~.- w..... - - . TRANSPORTATION 2000 A VG. DAILY w '" a: z II: ::J ... ., o ir o ~ u. 1'-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '."1 no UIOI ,.00 L._ -1- I I I I + TRAFFIC I I I I I I -4 ... '< II: .... >- II: .. .... :; :E '.1' m CUlll .nOD ___ PRIIolARY 'lolP"C:;T AREA . ,IWn:RCHANOE ..0' n cnoU "'00 el.17 m en,,) U'"0 w o z W II: ;: ~ ',... " '.II} '.200 ~ -' . LANTANA ROA ... ... OlzZI ...00 I.ZI m '1121 ..'110 HYPOlUXO ROA 1I0"l ...., N.W. 1. It on U) U) W II: '" Z o o .t.'" .I." ... eUlol ...00 I." ... (....1 ,OU." BOYNTON RD. " 0.00 - n'ROIJBH TAA'-f'IC J ..orAL TRA"'C . "'OlOROl" TAAf"IC ...NTICI,....'EO lANEAOE (1)00 10001 ....OT VOLU...E/C...,....CITY RATIO @ ~~~~::~~~A '.00 m ""'1 ..100 I,U on 1'.'11 ''''D~ 1. ,.,. 0..' m 11011 IIUIO --t I I I +- ':L' I ::::~ I S.w. 23 ----IJ DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT HEERY l HEE~Y ~.._-... POST. BUClllEY. SCHUH I. JERNIGAN -.-...---..-. QiGluLLAN SPELlACY.' MEYER --- D... m CI..., 110011 1." m (.OU) lUIOO I- U) W II: 1..' 0 " ., cun W Inoo (/) +- I I I I 1.11 " IUDI ...000 -T I I I I r 0.7. ... Ilno) 1I.'D I I I L_--t I ..- 0..' " ".011 "00 ,.. " (UIH 1000 D... " C11Dl ..aDO 0.71 no IUO) UaOO I I I I I I I I I I I I -+ sw. 15 MAP J-6 SHEET 11-24 R2~S~?_I~-11-79 -~---------~- ~.- w..... - - , TRANSPORTATION 1990 A VG. DAILY TRAFFIC .... '" ----..,,1'IT' LANTANA 00..00 0.1' ". l.D.,J UCloO -T I .... .. ,.2.) '10011 I I I I I -4 I I I 10.T, ". I h'4) U,O. ,.., ." Iuu) '2"11' 0." ". IlUIl "'00 0.21 ." U3U .11110 1'-- I I I I I I J I I I r I I J I I I I I HYPOlUXO RQ I I I L_--t I 1"""1 on '4.'. 0.7, H 'Ull. w '" a: z II: ::J .... ., o ii' o ~ ... I I I I I I J I J I I I -+ '''00 ". ... UIlOO 0.'1 .. I".) ..00 ~ " II: I- >- II: ., .... 0.01 ::; :> ." '10) nOQo w o z W II: ;: < ~ U) U) W II: '" Z o o I- U) W II: \'l' ~ IHI) W 2""0 (/) ..D.'" ..n ". en',) ....00 D.'" " l'O} ..00 t.17 ... IlU21 ....00 u ." 1101 UOOD BOYNTON RD. 't- I I I I ...00 U..' ... ..10 L.___ ..11 w ,.,.4\"; '''''6) -'- -t I I I I + 0.1. " ltDI 0." ." nUll ...00 (f"" u.oo S.W. 15 --t I I I t- I I 1.2' " to..) '1'00 SW. 23 :::::- _ -IJ " 1." PRIU"RY IMP,t,CT AREA . ,,,,TEROl...,,,OE JHIlOUOH TIIlArFIC J TO fill l MOTOROLA TRAFFlC: ,.",TICtP"TEO l'\"'E.\OE DODD ~ooo) " 'tRAFFle 0.00 ADT VOLUIolE/CAP"CITY RATIO @ ~~~'::::C:::~A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT HEER'l'l HEERY MAP J-5 ----"....-- POST. BUCKLEY. SCHUH l JERNlG-'N -.-....----...- o.o.IUUAN. SPElLACY.l ""EyER --- SHEET 11-23 --Il.:;ll.1~1LL-" -;n ~,- w..... - - TRANSPORTATION 1981 AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC w '" a: z II: ::J I- < o i< o ~ u. 1'-- I I I I I I J J I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I -4 G.'" u CUI) ..00 ~ " II: I- >- II: ;:. O"'l~ :; ~ :::'13 L.___ -t J I I I + ___PRI",...RY ''''PACT ......E... . INTliRCI1ANGC 0000 TtH~OUQK TRA"FIC IODO} ...OfOIlOl... "(RAFFle TOTAL TR..."FIC DL ""Il'ICI~"'''I:D LA"'E40E 0.00 ,un VOllJ..f/C........(:ITY RATIO @ ~~~R::::'~A .... u e."" .""0 ..11 n u." '''00 HYPOLUXO ROA lANTANA ROA 1.01 n 1t01l' "IfO~ 191..11 "'.1. w o z W II: ;: < ~ ..11 n till} ..DIl '" U) W ...n. ~ 'i~-- z IUO.) 8 '!tIl'OCl '>~'. n 110. "'0 I....} D.... U lIUI .~oo SW, 23 I.'. U .(ni, "'00 O.H '" ....00 0." no (",i ."1313 0.1' + ':~:l' "'013 I on I '" 1. I ... I U liD) 11100 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT ....EERy.. HEERY BOYNTON RD. --t I I I t- ----11 -----..- POST. BVC';lEY. SCHUH &. JERNIGAN -.-...---- p,G1l./L.....,.. S"'El.1.ACY." tolE'r'ER --- _.R8'ISEQ ] 0 -I ] -:12_ 0.1' U C..a, ...013 _I... " ClIII nl.'" .... U) W II: o.~. ~ Inj UJ .,,"oP C/) .., c.U ". -T I I I I I 'J: JIlII) '1'7'" I I I L_--t I D.'" n bUl, .'~ t."1 n IU.I '13.00 MAP ...., n hf., nD... I I I I I I I I I I I I -+ s.w. 15 SHEET11-22 J-4 ~.- w..... - - TRANSPORTATION 1979 AVG. DAILY w '" a: z II: ::J I- ., e II: o -' u. 1'--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L._ TR I I I I I I -- - -- -- --4 FFIC '''''''' (01240) .,. 1.21 11111101 1200 -'-T- I I I I 11.87 111.UC) 111100 I I I L_--t I ." (180) """ SITE '"'''' 14120) .00 ." 1580) ~ W 611100 " 0 II: Z U) I- W U) II: W I- >- ;: II: U) II: ., '" .00 W ., -' Z II: l- ." 0 111401 ." 0 :; (180) 111100 (1730) ." ., :E ." ,,, 0 ('870) W (UDI 201'00 U) 71i100 22000 ." (310) 3eDO -1 I I I I + ___ PRIIol"RY 'MPACT AREA . INTERCHANGE 0000 - 11111 AV'fRAGE DAl.Y TRArl'1C (000) - PM PEAK HOUR 000 - AOT VOlUME/CAPACITY R"nO @ ~~~C::~C:~A 7100 leeOl ." '" - - -. - C;;;O) lANTAN" 101700 .00 (.15) 5800 HYPOLUXO BOYNTON RD. 10400 ISS!;) 1.04 .00 (1130) 1:!l3DO --t I I I t- S.W. 23 "" I (~i8) I ____ ..L DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT H"ERY' HEERY POST, BUCK~EY.SC~lj;:';-JER~IGAN ......<.-...--....--.,-'" OrG1UU"N. SPEI..LACY.... MEYER ..................- ...Dt:\1Tf"'t::D......J...lL-.1...1 "'1"0 00000 (4720) .82 ~ .!. + I I I I 11~Il03Dl 20900 I I .00 (UO) 00"" MAP .-~ ,.... (U2'5) 11lDOO I I I I I I I I I I I I -+ S.W. 15 SHEET 11-21 J-3 ~.- \.1)..... - - TRANSPORTATION EXISTING, ROADWAY I I I I I I 1'--- ---------4 w '" a: z II: ::J I- ., c ir o ..J "- ..J " II: .... >- II: ., I- :; :E :ll.Ulr. L.______ ---1 I I I I + ___ PAlMAR)' 'IIAPACT "RE.. . I'HERCt1AHGE @ ~~~~'2C:~~A CONDITIONS LANTANA. I L""ll HYPOlUXO 'LA" w o z U) w U) II: W ;:- a: ., '" ..J Z o o BOYNTON RD. . \.....~. 'PIV1DECl \ on '" 1. + I I I I ~ lUIE' D.VIDED 5 t"~E' --t I I I t- I I . L""II DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT HEERV" ~EERY .......~.C""O'.__... POST. BUCKLEY. SCHUH" JtRN1GAN --....-...---.......-'-'" o.GIUUAN. SPELLACY." MEYER .---...- RI:\'IS:':D 10-11-79 -T I I I I I I I I I L__+ I I- U) w II: o ., w U) .L......-I -+ S.W, 15 MAP ..1-2 SHEET 11-20 The proposed Motorola site is a portion of a previously approved development' called Sandhill. Riteco Development CorporatiDn, the developer of Sandhill, had planned a cDmmercial tract and five multifamily parcels for the Motorola site. " These uses were projected to generate 12,685 trips per day, only 335 trips less than Motorola's projected 13,020. In contrast, ,the Sandhill plan was projected to generate 2,682 peak hour trips, over 1,000 mOre than the, 1,634 projected for Motorola. It appears that the Motorola project will-. ". actually have a lesser impact on surrounding roadways than the existi~g " approved plan. In order to mitigate the projected traffic impacts of the entire Sandhill project, , Riteco Corporation agreed (See Appendix 31-8 at the end of sectiDn) to provide the fallowing highway improvements (or payment in lieu thereof): four-laning of Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue along Riteco's entire frDntage ($137,OOO and $600,000, respectively); dedication of rights-of-way Dn Congress and N.W. 22nd of 120 and 108 feet, respectively; signalizing the intersections of N.W. 22nd Avenue with Congress, Sea crest and any project road~lays, \'Ihere warranted (S50,OOO for Congress and Seacrest); left turn lanes on the east and west approaches to the intersection of N.W. 22nd Avenue and Sea crest Boulevard. ($12,OOO); and construction of the intersection of Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue for ,500 feet north, south, and east of the intersection ($60,000). The payments total $859,000; however, $600,000 of that total is for four-laning N.H. 22nd Avenue, which is projected not to be needed by the Motorola ADA. Most of the improvements are timed to occur when a specified number of units are occupied or an associated number of daily trips are generated (generally 5,600 trips, except for four-laning N.W. 22nd, which would occur at 11,199 trips).. Similar agreements have been m~de with several other developers in the area. The result, as shown in Exhibit 31.6, is that a significant length of Congress Avenue, between Hypoluxo and Boynton Road, has commitments to four-laning by developers. In each case, the commitment dDes not have to be met until the ' particular project passes a specified threshold. Further, provision is made for the developer to reilnburse government if it should undertake the widening of Congress before the project crosses its threshold. The projection that Congress will be four lanes by 1990 is based primarily on these com~itments. However, these commitments do not provide a reliable projection of timing. Given the uncertainties of the development process, it is impossible to determine when the various improvements will be provided. A possible additional contribution that might be made to expanding highway capacity would be Motorola's contribution to the County's fair share road impact fee. However, that fee was suspended on November 13 and is scheduled to be revie~led in t1arch 1980. Since Motorola hopes to break ground befo)-e then, it I'lOuld likely not pay the impact fee on Phase I, even if the fee is even'tually reinstated. If the fee is reinstated, Notorola \'JOuld pay a total fee of $118,650 for Phases II and JII, based on the ordinance's cunent rate of S12.50jtrip. -" Another ;;otential mi ti gat i ng factor may resul t from effol-ts currently under \~ay by the Florida Department of Commerce to secure $2,000,000 in State monies for the pm-pose of four-l aning COl"gress Avenue fl-om Boynton Road north\1ard to the ~ -----_. -.'" "'.__~-__'O"""'_"",""""C~._, _ ~ - - . .. . - - . ------ , - . ---- - .._~.-.-- ~..-' ".. -- ..---- -:-' -. _.; --,' - - -- ..' .....:-: -';:.: .~. -..... ~::-. - -.- ........... -;.. :;::':-'-:-'-_"?-'i:':~:""'..:':~;~,~,;'~::- ~--::::.::~ -;. .- . ..... - . . .". . -- .. ~. -. - . . .-. ._:.--.:...~~.~.::...;::.:-::.:-=--:-.:. ":",:-:::"'::- ,,' 31-11 't/I~ ' J.; .C .- . - TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT 31.6 DEVELOPER coru~m'EN S FOR FOUR-LANII}6 CONGRESS AVErlUE . '.. -.:.--...:----r--------. - --y .' . . '., ., U~JT:.~:" 1 " J . I , 0'1 . I .: I I ...} . i ./1 I I J 1 J _ L~_+ J ~ .- .' , , HY?OlU~O T-~- --- I I I I J J J I I I I 'I J 1 I I J J I ~I Boynton Lakes i1eadows -=-11 300 -, -' J ' J J J J J J J 1 I I 1 -T w '" 0: "" <:: ::> >- < 9 <:: o --' '- , U.....,. ~ . y= . , "'-,,-':\ r-"7 ' '",,:,,},:,E Sandhill ~ {{, 1.:J : ~~.t:::: o 5 ~ '" '-" 3: DeBartoloC;- "" -' Nall ~2 f I I .J ::: c: >- :>- 0: < >- :J ~ >- ." '" c: c < '" "" '. I +---- 1 J 1 J BOY~no:-~ ?tJ_ J.....____~____...).. - . I J f I +- 'S.W~ 15 I ------:----} J I J I sw_ ;03 , ~l__- _IT-I 1/ I 3 ~ l ~ ~ . ~ . 'j , .......__ ,:t,,,,,-,<t,. J...."'JoCT A""oII _ () r;".i:R:;"l.lolo.:Cf 5 SOURCE: PAU: BEACH COUNTY TRAFFI C ENGI NEERS OFF I CE -. :1 i , '-'~.- 'O=V~tO?'::: :~I c~ ~~::;'_.~." :..; L". :;.~.?,;..c~T'''::::--:_':~'-'-~-:~~~-~,:~~ ~~ ~~~~~~ t':::;': ~ .....!! l:. ' ''i 1\A'\.'~---C"i::;"-: ., . :- - -, :---:'----;- '-- -- . " 0 :\ f f::l'" ~r, " "~. 7 ,: # . \ . ....~ . r ., r _'. ;.-,:-\ J"jj~O j J::XR.,O,_~5J i ',I , \ I '....J ' . . - r~; ~.~~ ~;~ :~~ g~i::;~ ~ ~~:~~~.p r;)t1..).. [':~.l PJ,'." ~.;.=..:~ CQ........:y. T~.:::~.:U. .._,'~'----" 31-11a -.--- - -- ~. A,. P. O. BOX 310 120 N.E. 2ND AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH. FLOA:IDA 3343:i CITY of BOYNTON BEACH January 8th, 1980 Certified Mail No. 336982 Mr. Sam Shannon, Executive Director Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 50 Kindred Street P.O. Box 2395 Stuart, Florida 33494 Dear Mr. Shannon: Accompanying this letter you will find a certified copy of Ordinance # 79-36 approved on second and final reading on January 7th, 1980 by the Boynton Beach City Council which rezones land and adopts a development order in conjunction with the Motorola Development of Regional Impact. This ordinance is forwarded to you in conformance with Chapter 22-F -1.23{5l of the Florida Administrative Code. Thank you again for your help in expeditiously processing this matter of great importance to the City of Boynton Beach. Yours very truly, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH ~.r.~ '- ,.. ...~ CSA:pf enc. cc: Peter Cheney, City Manager Ms. Joan Haggen, Secretary, Dept. of Community Affairs Jacob Varn, Secretary, Dept. of Environmental Reg. Warren Strahm, Sub-district Mgr, Dept. of Environmental John Maloy, Exec. Dir., So. Fla. Water Mgt District Jack Gesbocker, Heery & Beery Central File CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, City Planner Reg. : ; ! , ~- r'-- '/ :~;:~" '",tor,! ',' ...., ...... ""'\" :.44::";: "::'?~ J~:::'f:":'/: treOlure COQJ.t regional planniQ9 council r1 ~r' .,,",:.f" jUll \ L::vJ July 16, 1980 r1r. Carmen Annunziato, Planner City of Boynton Beach 120 NE Second Avenue Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Dear Carmen: Please find enclosed a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Progress Report Questionnaire(s). This questionnaire is intended to update the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the State of Florida with regard to the status of DRI 's within YOU)' jurisdiction. In addition, you~ comments can be helpful in improving the DRI process. The questionnaire, and your comments, will be in our annual report to the Division of State Plannin9. Thank you for your earliest consideration of this matter. If you have any questions, please contact Howard Muise of thi s St.aff. Yours truly, ~.. Sam Shannon Executive Director SSjHM:lb Enclosure(s) 50 kindred st. p,o, box 2395 stuc."'lrt, Florida 33494 phone (305) 286-3313 patrick b. IIJons chairman norman gregory vice chairman thomas j. hi99ins seaetary/treasurer sam shannon executiv~ dire~or DRI PROGRESS REPORT --QUESTIONNAIRE Development: Motorola Manufacturing, Development & Administrative Facility City of Boynton Beach Location (City or County) Developer: Name Address Jack Gesbocker Heery & Heery Architects & Engineers, Inc. 880 W. Peachtree Street Atlanta, Ga., 30309 Procedures: 1. none 2. N/A 3. No 4. None 5. No 6. None 7. No action necessary to date. 8. The Motorola DRI procedure was completed in record time owing to the diligent effort of all parties involved. Reducing the time between actions was a most important factor. 9. None 9) Other comments? Person completing questionnaire Carmen S. Annunziato Title City Planner Representing City of Boynton Beach Telephone Number Date (305) 734-8111 ext. 255 7/24/80 Regional Planning Agency Response: 1) Do yo\.. agree \'iith the information provided in question l? 0 Yes 0 No (please check appropriate box). 2) If you checked "no", which questions and specific responses do you disagree with? 3) What are your reasons for disagreement? RPA Respondent Region Telephone # Date CITY of BOYNTON BEACH ~ f -. ~",' P. O. BOX 310 120 N.E. 2ND AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA 33435 January 8th, 1980 Mr. Sam Shannon, Executive Director Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 50 Kindred Street P.O. Box 2395 Stuart, Florida 33494 Dear Mr. Shannon: Accompanying this letter you will find a certified copy of Ordinance # 79-36 approved on second and final reading on January 7th, 1980 by the Boynton Beach City Council which rezones land and adopts a development order in conjunction with the Motorola Development of Regional Impact. This ordinance is forwarded to you in conformance with Chapter 22-F -1.23(5) of the Florida Administrative Code. Thank you again for your help in expeditiously processing this matter of great importance to the City of Boynton Beach. Yours very truly, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH c.....,.."'---. .r: ~ '- /"'~ CSA:pf enc. cc: Peter Cheney, City Manager Ms. Joan Haggen, Secretary, Dept. of Community Affairs Jacob Varn, Secretary, Dept. of Environmental Reg. Warren Strahm, Sub-district Mgr, Dept. of Environmental John Maloy, Exec. Dir., So. Fla. Water Mgt District Jack Gesbocker, Heery & Heery Central File CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, City Planner Reg. CITY of BOYNTON BEACH ~ -;. P. O. BOX 310 120 N.E. 2ND AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 334:35 October 19th, 1979 Mr. Sam Shannon, Executive Director Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 50 Kindred Street Stuart, Florida 33494 Dear Mr. Shannon: The advertisement that accompanies this letter is submitted for your information as required by Chapter 22F-l.21 Paragraph 2 of the Florida Administrative Code. Please advise if you require any additional information. Yours very truly, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH ~s:~ CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, City Planner CSA:pf enc. cc: Peter Cheney, City Manager Central File , ~ " ....- ., - .. ..' _ NO,"'''' ' t' : N011C1tOFPUBLlCHEARINO':', , NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that 1M Ot}' ,CoundI of W ClU' of Boynton Beach will . bold. . PubUc He-arlnI' at 1;00 P.M.., 011 ;: ~Y. Decemb<< 18. lJ"lI. in the Council ,-aw..mben. CIty HaIl, 120 N.E. 2Dd Avrmw '~~~:riDa~.~~ ~r~~' .: '. In6 ....".,bed propeTty Joca..., WlIhlD the "! lImJta 01 aid -CSt,.. Palm Beach CountY. .~ ~ to the nq~ Dt. the parties em i ~:.1-~.r.;~~ ;';; ~j;_;~ ':-r f~~ t:.~ t REZONE 1rom Cot aDd R.3 to FlaI'lDed ; j. lDduftrial 'OI!ovelopmeat, this reqUdt III . . t- COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT. J ~. OFRElGIONAL,rKP~..;',"'''''' ':-'t<~ _ Legal DoocrtpUoa, ,. 4 ,""". """ ,.' ~, All'" Traa. .. tbrou.Ib 1DT. SecttOD 210, , SubdlvislOD of Secti0D8 29 aod 20, 'l'OWD- . IIb1p 45 South; R.angeo 43 Eaft., .. per plat tbe.Teol, recorded In Plat Book 1. Pap- ~ 20, of tbe publie recordI: of Palm 'Beach County. Florida, Including JO toot .u1p located in SectJOD 20, Townah1p C5 South. ~ R.a..ngeC Ea.t', and bounded on 'the South by Boyntoa Canal and on the north b7 TnLct 9(. Section 20, of the IIUbdJvtmoa ot_ SectlODll .29 aDd 20, Township 45 SOUth. .Ra.n.p 43 "East, .ccordlng 'to. the 'p1at~ tbereoC, recorded in Plat Book:'1, Page~ ZO, Palm'Beach County Records.- alao fD.. cluding .aD toot strip 5hoWD ..Road Easement runn1n.e from Ca:n.al' C16 - :1 North to the- north l1nes of Loti! 102 aDd j lO"l extended of 5Ubdlv1sloD of Secdons 29 1 and 20, recorded In Plat Book 7. Page 20 ~.. . of the ""tJubllc records of "Palm Beach ~ ...., County. Florida. J,ying between Lou: 96 to 102 011 the East ~ Lots N. 95 :and 103 r ~g~ 107 ~ ~. w~ ~_5a1~ 5UbdJ";i....... ALSO, aU lands, lncludlng lake bonom of Lake Jackson and lands designated uSand Beach" or "'Low Muck" or other-- wise 1y1ng between .the above de$crlbrd property and west or the Right4-Way of ;. the Lake Worth Dr&lnage DiBtrlct EquaJ-. I Lzing Canal &4, excepting that portion or . 'Tracts 91, 95, 103, lOt, 105. 106 and 107, SectIon 2O,subdJvislon of Sections 29 and 20, TownshIp e South, Ra~ 43 East, according to the plat thereof, recorded lD ~. . Plat BoOk 7, Page 20, Palm -Beach Coun- 1J' public records -wh.lcb lies wlthln 50 feet of the We5t line or J;.B...id Section 20. . ALSO, all that part of the SW 'n-of Sec- tion 17 and the NW % of Section 20, I Township e South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, F1orlda, lyIJIC south of the t - southerI)' Right-of-Way Jint!:of NW 22nd I Avenue as described l.D 'OffR\al reconh _ Book .1138,. Page '1686 offbe public ; records of Palm. Beach County : Florida, I and north of the subdlvUrlon of "Sections: 29 and 20, TOWIlShtp 45 South, Rarlge .0 East, recorded in Plat Book 7, 'Pag~ 20, herE'inabove descrlbed, .and east of "the easterly line of Rlght-of.Way of Congress Avenue and .....est of the westerly Une or Rigbt-or.Way' line' -or the Lake Worth DTalnage [)I.:;;trlct EquaUz:tng Canal E-4.. . E::Ilcepting from. a.ii of the above de- 5Clibed . property the Rigbt~.Way 'Ol Congress Avenue, Lake Worth Dr&lnage Db:trict Equaliz1ng Canal E..f and Right.. or.Way,.of CaJuU C16 formerly Boynton. Canal. _ "'" Containing: 89.375 aCres man! lesS:'. '. - Address.: '"Southeast corner or Congrea Avenue and N.W. 22m! Ave. . Uee: EleoctrlcaJ Equipment Manufactur-. I 1ng Complex and Office Complex. . Applicant; MOTOROl-A., INC. . I Any penIOn5 having any .objection to the It above, Bnd aU persons Interested lb....... -In, shaU po!'Ilent said ob}ectJonll at the . .- _ '~bove crri'Qj. ~~N B~CH>~?"f;~t.~. ~' ~ . ...~~DG'E!!..l:..:~;':" ~::-:.:'!?~;- PUBLISH; PALM BEACH POST TIMES ,~'..~ , October 18, 1979 . . .- ... . ~ " " '. , . , . ,I..I " ,......... '. ,,- ,. ~.... - "' ~. , ~ .,. .-....-.:., >~ ~;:. .~. ~-..tO ~' . . -..-.- "'. .-:-- ' .~r The following received the same letter: 1. Ms. Joan Haggen, Secretary Department of Community Affairs Howard Building 2571 Executive Circle, East Tallahassee, Florida 32301 2. Jacob Varn, Secretary Department of Environmental Regulations Twin Towers Office Building 2600 Blairstone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32301 3. Warren Strahm Sub-District Manager Department of Environmental Regulation 3301 Gun Club Rd. West Palm Beach, Florida 33402 4. John R. Maloy, Executive Director South Florida Water Management District P.O. Box 'V' West Palm Beach, Florida 33402 ; } , .3 -~2.cI) ;iu~y ! k-1-. Jk~~ c2.7/'IA. .3. TJt1. D-6-- !J M- i, 7Ju,7u~ s. )J1A'~~'/JJ. io-Mv ~ , . . f --"'"'"':\. " -- ?.J.,) ... ('" ," ).} ( ;" I ! / ~}~" /.~ , ~' ": ,,/'" ~)j.,.,.~. '"v } ~". I. ; I I --t> ,I I' 2.i " " " II " Ii ,I 'i II II II " ,I I' ,I II II 3.11 y" I, ! , , y. tJ€12... !Jor::rCG /-tus-J /3<= --rJ-fE l=i::JL-Lu.......o::;,Je:,: 6X:' Ub A..) TO 11..5. ::::JO"'AJ 1-1 A6 ~ / J'€:: c...ALet...-'\-AL '7 ~ ,(J=,4~A:T.--<-1e^""T OF ~A..A/'-'1,.h.....a::rY /'trF~ !t7:J<.A",/.A.-€.JO ,g~G 2-.5-7/ E xau I oJ- (/6 c::oec LG cAS! rALL"'I ff-<\;SJ<:"c ) r'-. 32.,30 j fl.t.IL . ~ AC-.0<3 V --1.e.;u / 2>-= c ~ !OcI:JA ;Q.T ".,(/Ie /l..7I or f'J V:X-~ A./ /'-'> ~ ~ /X\ (, ~ . /<- /fr-- 7Oc.......I~ FtC;cc- .;(3U:XLI{):r/V'c::' '2 boo ,8L "'. " /.3 ~ .Y'TDA,_d~ TALLA~ ~ ,/ rL. 4Ae:J .3230/ /'1 R. . '-v' ..., ,e/c..c?/V .5(.)..6 .a:rs~a- /,}e.;:; A R:7 ,..vt €,A/f 330 I H .A-7 € AJ 1.J;:::Oeo.o../ ;"'f cA....7?'\ C ~ bUL.-<\. -r.:z:::o.v' lC.eJ 33'/02 Hv€... -=rofl A.J R.. . 6() c.mi r'o ALOY / €:'Xec-.v-r-::r(./~ ~c:=CirJ-z. >4 'TS'2- ~"""-' A.(3:S~ e^'r- A:J::I::ST.A::l=c:T c.....k~-r /8';;: <",\C H / F'- 3..3~()2- ., \\ \ \ \ \ \ , .5'- , I I 'I \, ;\ \\ \\ \ \ \~ \\ 'II II \\ '~ \ ~ 1..\ 'I \\ '\ \\ \, ~ \ \, _ Q:J:f(.rEa"li ~. .-rV~ EXE'-v' - . p.)c.::r:'- :5 H AtU~c)AI / 1'(~jV:;pU(" L.rtY.J .ut,.. s,;v/! /1~NAf... ,-' ASI /---- i -r,.e.GA)~ c::;P A-.:::-r 1'- -t:) SfT~ . t<::;::~~ - 239-5- SO ~ /Ol))< ,I)O.JI 0 F F'.:r: c <:;; .,' '33 't <j 0/ ~A~I ~4 ~ YV1 ~ / .., u-H tJ).JJ--'fil !i.1Il &. / f~ a~ <;f3D iJJ:b / ~D."o1 A I ! ~ r. ~ aJ1 JI!!^J;I1!;.,) 7Y-- ) ~ 6) ~ . (]1~ I -1f ~ t~ ~~X ~~ C) If~ ,??OO() Y~'. JrA~ ~ -~ ~> ~ ).. "'l...- ~~ ~ /Juft ot~ 1. ~=~'~rW~~~ ~i ~ f\ . . n.~cvJ M 53\) ~' !>J.3ol ~/) CITY of BOYNTON BEACH (J)JA. r!..J - '} P. O. BOX 310 120 N.E. 2ND AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435 January 8th, 1980 Certified Mail No. 336980 Mr. Sam Shannon, Executive Director Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 50 Kindred Street P.O. Box 2395 Stuart, Florida 33494 Dear Mr. Shannon: Accompanying this letter you will find a certified copy of Ordinance # 79-36 approved on second and final reading on January 7th, 1980 by the Boynton Beach City Council which rezones land and adopts a development order in conjunction with the Motorola Development of Regional Impact. This ordinance is forwarded to you in conformance with Chapter 22-F -1.23(5) of the Florida Administrative Code. Thank you again for your help in expeditiously processing this matter of great importance to the City of Boynton Beach. Yours very truly, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH c......~.,-....... .r. c:: /"'~ CSA:pf enc. cc: Peter Cheney, City Manager Ms. Joan Haggen, Secretary, Dept. of Community Affairs Jacob Varn, Secretary, Dept. of Environmental Reg. Warren Strahm, Sub-district Mgr, Dept. of Environmental John Maloy, Exec. Dir., So. Fla. Water Mgt District Jack Gesbocker, Heery & Beery Central File CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, City Planner Reg. :1 .J ~ '1 '~ i I :'1 , .1 1 .i HI i , ~ "I ' 1 cO -] 1 ; ;',. l , : j " I , , J , ;1 , ,I ":':1 "\ ~I ,,1 ,I , ~' :;i ,ql , , , -~ ., ;,-i 1 ; ~ , '! i , , ;'! .J I ] j , i j " j 1 j .~ ,I ::1 "i "j , I , ; , ! ":) ! , . ~ ~ ",~--' trecvure COaJ.t "\'i;53&{~~,;~;t4~1 regional . ',., planniQ9 councd st. lude .r1idrtfn.. :1 ",'.".:. I . . December 10, 1979 The Honorable Edward Harmening Mayor, City of Boynton Beach 120 N.E. Second Avenue Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Subject: Motorola Development of Regional Impact Dear Mayor Harmening: I. /'~ I\jtOA -ro As~ ptG,v'( "ecjlJoq A(}OP~fc f 0 lm/U<t O~ 12/7/11 79 I am hereby transmitting the report and recommendations adopted by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council on December 7, 1979 for the Motorola DRI. The enclosed report and recommendations represent the fulfillment of the Council's responsibilities as provided for in Chapter 380.06(8), Florida Statutes. Upon review of the report and recommendations, should you feel that the Council staff can be of any further assistance, please contact me at your convenience. I look forward to receipt of the City's adopted Development Order, as provided for in Chapter 380.07, Florida Statutes. In turn, the City will be notified of the action taken by Council upon the Development Order's review. Yours truly, ~--5t..-(. Sam Shannon Executive Director SS:cs Attachment cc: Carm~n Annunziato Scott Benyon Ned trooke Peter Cheney JohniGesbocker Norman Gregory Linda Haunert Bruce Johnson Mary Lou Lackey Stan Redick James Scully Alex Sokolik Charles Walker Tom Walker ':\ \ "";;'~;::i:~:.t~ \. , "... '.,~_ ", b\~:z.;..~~~ ~;q: ,bJr;::d;it. p.o. j)t;~ .?395 ;;~''':::'ft, !:,";..;(L~ ~3494 phorje P(;') t;:G&-3313 th';j11(;S j. h:g'Jtns (hnirlT'0i~ James White Bob Wi 11 i amson w.w. siebert, jf. ~ice choirmclIl cdtumd h. gluck!er sccrcton) Itre':lsurcr sam shannon ex:~cutiYe climctor 12.1 13.1 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.5 20.6 24.1 30.1 31.1 31. 2 3; .3 37.1 37.2 LIST OF TABLES Motorola Phasing Average Daily Emissions (Pounds/Day) Palm Beach Employment Statistics 1970-August 1979 Estimated Employment in Nonagricultural Establishments, West Palm Beach/Boca Raton SMSA (Palm Beach County) Estimated Geographic Distribution of Construction Expenditures (1979 Dollars) Estimated Employment and Payroll Noncunstruction Employment by Income Range (1979 Dollars) Ad valorem Tax Revenues Projected Solid/Chemical Wastes by Phase Fire Protection Services Which Would Serve Motorola Site Trip Generation Rates Levels of Service Average Daily Trips and Employment by Phase Air Freight Projections Number of Employees 11-2 13-1 20-2 20-3 20-4 20-4 20-4 20-7 24-1 30-1 31-1 31-3 31-3 37-1 37-1 - - - - . . LIST OF EXHIBITS 12.1 Motorola Location r1ap II-2 . 12.2 Motorola Conceptual Site Plan and Phasing II-3 - 31.1 Existing Conditions 31-5 31.2 Phase I Conditions (1981) 31-6 - 31.3 Pha se II Conditions (1990) 31-7 31.4 Phase III Conditions (2000) 31-9 - 31.5 Summary of Traffic Conditions 31-10 - 31.6 Developer Commitments for Four-lanin9 Congress Avenue 31-12 - - - - - - - - - - - - region. These workers and their families will create demands for schools, water and sewer services, police and fire protection, and other government services. Since the provision of services historically has often lagged behind the demands created by new growth, the population induced by Motorola may offset the positive fiscal impact of the facility itself. In addition, some of this new population may live in municipalities which will receive no revenue from Motorola. The result could be a negative fiscal impact on such communities. The environment and natural resources in the vicinity of the project will receive minimal impact from the project. Since the site has been previously altered, it contains no wetlands, vegetation, or wildlife habitats of signi- ficant value. The canals adjacent to the site have typical water quality which should not be significantly affected by the project if the recommended conditions and requirements of the South Florida Water Management District are met. Adequate handling of solid wastes should preclude any serious impacts from toxic or hazardous waste. The only significant negative impact of the project will be on roads. Most roads in the area are currently adequate, but will generally deteriorate through the development period of the project. By the end of the project's second phase in 1990, several roads will be operating at service level F, with volumes upwards of 50% over capacity. Although Motorola will not be the primary cause of the overloaded facilities, it will be a part of the general problem of growth in the area, outpacing the community's ability to build new roads. The Motorola facility will be a con- tributing factor to highway congestion by the addition of traffic to roads which will already be overloaded. Tne recommended conditions to the Development Order would mitigate Motorola's impact on the highway system. However, since Motorola will be responsible for only a part of the highway problem, those conditions to the Development Order cannot be expected to result in roadways operating at satisfactory levels of service. Substantially more than mitigation of Motorola's impact will be necessary to accomplish that. It will take a major commitment from the com- munity at lay.ge to upgrading highways before the transportation system can be expected to provide adequate levels of service in future years. Despite the projected roadway conditions near the project, approval with the recommended conditions should be given because of the facility's major positive impact on the region's economy. Motorola's contribution in jobs, income, and taxes, along with the mitigation of its negative impacts, were found to be a reasonable basis for local government approval of the project. II 1-2 -. ~ The recommendations required under Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes are those recommendations adopted by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council at the regularly scheduled December 7, 1979 Council meeting. It is the recommendation of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council that the Motorola Manufacturing, Development and Administrative Facility be approved, with the following conditions to the Development Order: 1. The Motorola ADA, plus the following additional information submitted to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, shall be made a part of the Development Order by an express condition of the Development Order: a. Supplemental information sUJmitted under cover letters dated October 11, 1979 and November 30, 1979 from John Gesbocker of Heery & Heery, Architects & Engineers, Inc.; b. Supplemental information provided under a cover letter dated November 21, 1979 from Mary Lou Lackey of Motorola, Inc. 2. In the event the developer fails to commence significant physical develop- ment within four years from the date of rendition of the Development Order, development approval shall terminate and the development shall be subject to further consideration. Significant physical development shall mean site clearing and foundations for the facility. 3. In the event of discovery of archaeological artifacts during project con- struction, the applicant shall avoid damage in that area and notify and cooperate with the Division of Archives. Proper protection, to the satisfaction of the Division of Archives, shall be provided by the applicant. 4. A program of regular vacuum sweeping of all paved surfaces on the project site shall be instituted and carried out by Motorola. A description of 111-3 . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. II II II II II II . .. .. 12. The applicant shall establish and actively support a car pooling program. At the end of the first year of Phase I operations, Motorola shall provide a written report to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, the Metropolitan Planning Organization, the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer, and the City of Boynton Beach on its activities and an evaluation of their effectiveness. 13. Within one year of the commencement of Phase I operations, or any subsequent expansion of facilities, the applicant shall undertake a study of the feasi- bility of establishing or participating in a van pool program and shall transmit the results of that study to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, the Metropolitan Planning Organization, the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer, and the City of Boynton Beach. 14. Upon commencement of Phase I operations, or any subsequent expansion, the applicant shall provide the Palm Beach County Transportation Authority with information regarding the general location of its employees' residences and shall consult with the Authority regarding the feasibility of establishing or expanding routes to serve the plant. If bus service is provided to the plant, the applicant shall provide boarding and unloading space on-site or provide space for turnout bays along Congress and N.W. 22nd Avenue, if needed. II 1-6 ,".'3"''''''' this program shall be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, South Florida Water Management District, Palm Beach County, the Area Planning Board and City of Boynton Beach. 5. Motorola shall request the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) to determine which of their projected chemical wastes would be classified as toxic or hazardous. 6. Motorola shall develop and institute special handling and disposal procedures for its toxic or hazardous wastes which are acceptable to DER. 7. Plant operation of the proposed DR1 shall not be permitted to begin unless conditions 5 and 6 above have been met. 8. Motorola shall fully investigate the options for meeting hot water require- ments, completely or in part, through the use of solar energy or waste heat recovery. Results of this investigation shall be presented to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the City of Boynton Beach and, if cost- effective, Motorola shall implement the most feasible and effective of these options during construction. 9. The applicant shall provide an easement along Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue to accommodate a bikeway/pedestrian path, in accordance with the City's and Palm Beach County's Comprehensive Plans. 10. The following road and traffic improvements will be needed as the proposed project is developed by the applicant: a. The intersection of all project driveways with Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue shall be improved with left turn lanes, right turn lanes and traffic signals, as warranted by the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer. b. The intersection of Congress Avenue and N.W, 22nd Avenue shall be improved with left turn lanes, right turn lanes and traffic signals 111-4 - - - - as warranted by the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer. c. The highway improvements described in the following sections of the agreement between Palm Beach County and Riteco Development Corporation, dated August 1,1978, relating to traffic impacts of the proposed Sandhill project: Section III - Traffic signals; Section IV - Left turn lanes, N.W. 22nd Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard; Section V - Intersection on Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue; Section VI - Four-laning of Congress Avenue. d, The widening of Congress Avenue between Boynton and Hypoluxo Roads to an ultimate six lanes, with the design level of service for highway planning designated by the Metropolitan Planning Organization. In order to assist Palm Beach County, the State of Florida, and all other involved and responsible governmental agencies to timely and expeditiously plan for the engineering and construction required, and to budget for the acquisition of public or governmental funds for the construction of these roads and traffic improvements, the applicant shall give written notice to Palm Beach County of its intent to commence construction on any approved facility in the p,oposed project, not less than six months {and preferably one yea~, prior to the date upon which it proposes to commence such construction. 11. Motorola shall dedicate to Palm Beach County the following rights-of-way along Motorola's entire roadway frontage: Congress Avenue 60 feet from centerline; N.W. 22nd Avenue 60 feet from centerline. II 1-5 . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. EXHIBIT 31.5, ,UMMARY OF TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing Phase 1 Phase II Phase 1 II 1979 1981 1990 2000 Con9ress Avenu ct ct . . (south of Hy oluxo) Congress Avenu ct () . . (north of Hy oluxo) Boynton Road 0 0 . . (1-95 to Con ress) Boynton Road () . . . (west of CJrgress) N.W. 22nd Ave ue 0 0 0 ct Hypo1uxo Road . . 0 0 (Congress t 1-95) Hypoluxo Road 0 0 0 0 (west of Co gress) Lantana Road . . 0 . (Congress 1-95) Lantana Road 0 0 ct . (west of C ngress) 1-95 0 0 . . (Lantana t Hypo1uxo) 1-95 0 0 () . (HYPoluxo o Boynton) 1-95 0 0 . . (Boynton tb S.\L 15th - SOURCE: TCR C STAFF LEVEL OF SERVICE OA&B (tC&D .E&F 31-1 - -----' ------_--C............----'_ ... .- - . . The proposed Motorola site is a portion of a previously approved development called Sandhill. Riteco Development Corporation, the developer of Sandhill, had planned a commercial tract and five multifamily parcels for the Motorola site. These uses were projected to generate 12,685 trips per day, only 335 trips less than Motorola's projected 13,020. In contrast, the Sandhill plan was projected to generate 2,682 peak hour trips, over 1,000 more than the 1,634 projected for Motorola. It appears that the Motorola project will actually have a lesser impact on surrounding roadways than the existing approved plan. In order to mitigate the projected traffic impacts of the entire Sandhill project, Riteco Corporation agreed (See Appendix 31-B at the end of section) to provide the following highway improvements (or payment in lieu thereof): four-laning of Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue along Riteco's entire frontage ($137,000 and $600,000, respectively); dedication of rights-of-way on Congress and N.W. 22nd of 120 and 108 feet, respectively; signalizing the intersections of N.W. 22nd Avenue with Congress, Seacrest and any project roadways, where warranted ($50,000 for Congress and Seacrest); left turn lanes on the east and west approaches to the intersection of N.W. 22nd Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard ($12,000); and construction of the intersection of Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue for 500 feet north, south, and east of the intersection ($60,000). The payments total $859,000; however, $600,000 of that total is for four-laning N.W. 22nd Avenue, which is projected not to be needed by the Motorola ADA. Most of the improvements are timed to occur when a specified number of units are occupied or an associated number of daily trips are generated (generally 5,600 trips, except for four-laning N.W. 22nd, which would occur at 11,199 trips). . - - - - - - - Similar agreements have been made with several other developers in the area. The result, as shown in Exhibit 31.6, is that a significant length of Congress Avenue, between Hypoluxo and Boynton Road, has commitments to four-laning by developers. In each case, the commitment does not have to be met until the particular project passes a specified threshold. Further, provision is made for the developer to reimburse government if it should undertake the widening of Congress before the project crosses its threshold. The projection that Congress will be four lanes by 1990 is based primarily on these commitments. However, these commitments do not provide a reliable projection of timing. Given the uncertainties of the development process, it is impossible to determine when the various improvements will be provided. - - - - A possible additional contribution that might be made to expanding highway capacity would be Motorola's contribution to the County's fair share road impact fee. However, that fee was suspended on November 13 and is scheduled to be reviewed in March 1980. Since Motorola hopes to break ground before then, it would likely not pay the impact fee on Phase I, even if the fee is eventually reinstated. If the fee is reinstated, Motorola would pay a total fee of $118,650 for Phases II and III, based on the ordinance's current rate of $12.50/trip. - - Another potential mitigating factor may result from efforts currently under way by the Florida Department of Commerce to secure $2,000,000 in State monies for the purpose of four-laning Congress Avenue from Boynton Road northward to the - - 31-11 . - ~..;.. w. -- - .... j - '"., · TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT 31. 6 DEVELOPER C0I1MIH1EN S FOR FOUR-LANI CONGRESS AVENUE .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. f .. r " " i $ I .. i I ~ " - ~ .. .. 1 , 'I .. " ) SOURCE: PAU~ BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC ENGINEERS OFFICE " ., .. J , .~_.-..- I ---------; I I I I 5.\'1. 23 ~l----ff.l 1/ lU '" ii: % '" J .... < Q '" o -' "- I I I I I I T":"--- -- - -- --.....-4 I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I J I I -' =< 0: .... > II: < ... :; ::i .L.---------'t I I J I 4- ___ p;ll......"''' IUJ>>,\CT ARE~ . () I"TE~C"'''''''C:= '/1,---;\\ h, _ ,.. ~ ._ , ., ... " \ f\ f;;':P'..:O""7"~?,,",\,':.r-;,O,7 $\ .' I :;- \ > ,s. J ;J ~ '''-'''': f":j ~_ ...~r-#.. ~ .. I I \ / , "'__/ B;;r(T0'i E'::;"":-~ f'....~,\ D:::~~ cou."rY.F~(F'l!:J"" .. ..-..--.--.--- . -------~ - HY?OlU:<O Lakes lU o :z '" 0: :< DeBartolo, <( -' Ma1l0 BOYHTO:--i p.o. '" C> .!- -j--- I J I I O:::V~LO?,'/~i'~T OF R::.~:':).'~.;!... I\!?;'.CT t-:;::;>"f ~ ....~:::. !' ~~ ~ ;-~~ ~~~:~:~i~~i~~:~ ~;-;~':~~ '. ":"-"""-"-"---' 31-12 .. I i I I I I I .... '" lU co C < '" '" .' , ." I I I L__+ I I I I I I J I I I J J I -)- 'S.W.15 vicinity of N. to the Motoro 1 economic devel this could be northward to L . 22nd. The prOV1Slon of this money would be directly related project and represents part of the State's efforts to promote pment. The County would be required to match the funds, but atisfied by the County continuing the four-laning of Congress ntana Road from the point reached with the use of State funds. One highway im rovement that could have the potential to improve conditions markedly in th area is the addition of an interchange with 1-95 on N.W. 22nd Avenue. For t e large number of Motorola trips that use Hypoluxo, Lantana, and Boynton Roads 0 get to I-95, this could eliminate the impact of those trips on these roads an Congress Avenue. The proposed widening of N.W. 22nd to four lanes by Riteco woul provide considerable excess capacity which might be able to handle the additional load. Such an interchange would also provide an alternative route for a large am unt of non-Motorola traffic. Although an interchange would be expensive, the prospect that six lanes on Congress may not be enough by the year 2000 may make he alternative fiscally attractive. The possible addition of the interchange wa rants close study by the Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Florida De artment of Transportation to determine what impact it would have on traffic con itions in the area and whether it would be cost-effective. FISCAL H1PACT The proposed f cility will create costs for new and expanded roadways to meet the traffic ge erated by it. It will also generate revenues that will be available to provide the needed additional road facilities. The purpose of this section is to estimate th net fiscal impact of Motorola with respect to roads. The method use to estimate costs and revenues is based on the report, Economic Aspects of the Pro osed Palm Beach County Road Im act Fee Ordinance, produced by the FAU/F1U Joint Center for Environmental and Urban Problems in January, 1979. That st dy set out a methodology that could be used to calculate the net financial mpact of any proposed development on roads. The approach taken is to estimate the cost of building the lane miles of road needed to accommodate the project's aily traffic. The property tax and gasoline tax revenues generated by the project and available for highway improvements are then credited against the cost to de ermine the net impact. Cost = number of trips x average trip length x cost/lane mile capaci ty/l ane The formula st tes that the cost is obtained by dividing the total daily miles of travel crea ed by the project (number of daily trips times the average length of a trip) by he capacity of a lane of roadway and multiplying the result by the cost of building one mile of one lane of road (lane mile). The capacity building a la County Engine daily, \~ith a Appendix 31-A f a highway lane is 6,000 vehicles daily and the average cost of e mile of road was estimated to be $300,000 by the Palm Beach r's Office. When built out, Motorola will generate 13,020 trips average length of 7.3 miles (estimated using second table in Using these values to solve the equation yields: 31-13 Cost ~ 13,020 tri ~ x 7.3 miles $300 000 lane/mile ~ 6,000 vehlcles/lane x , 15.841 lane miles x $300,000/lane mile ~ $4,752,300 The result of he above equation is to charge the project for the lane miles of road needed to accommodate every trip which ends or begins at the project. However, all t ose trips have an origin or destination at some other location, such as a home or store. If the same formula were applied to the land uses at the other end f Motorola's trips, the result would be to count the cost of the trip twice. T erefore, to eliminate double counting, the impact of a project's traffic, the f gure derived from the cost equation should be divided by two. Applying this 0 Motorola, the cost of Motorola's share of trips which begin or end at the lant is $2,376,150. Motoro a's share of cost ~ $4,752,300 ~ $2,376,150 2 Once the road ost has been determined, it is necessary to reduce it by the revenues avail ble for roads which are generated by property taxes from the facility and g soline taxes from the vehicles going to and from the facility. The property t x credit for Motorola was calculated using Table 6, Property Tax Credit for Non-residential Uses, from the FAU/FIU report. This credit is a lump sum val e to account for taxes paid twenty-five years into the future, as well as fo taxes paid ten years into the past (for undeveloped land). The table establis ed a credit of $54,719 for $10,000,000 worth of estimated sales price. Based n Motorola's assessed value at build out of $35,017,000 from Table 20.6, M torola's property tax credit would be $191,610. Motorola's mo the property for a twenty- separately fo feet main bui Motorola's av those used to Motorola's tr for transport wi 11 be longe tribute more per square fo consumption a activities wi County's stan or fuel tax credit is based on Table 7 in the FAU/FIU report. Like ax credit, the motor fuel tax credit represents a lump sum value ive year stream of taxes. The calculation of the credit is done the 200,000 square feet of office space and the 625,000 square ding. Adjustments are then made to compensate for the fact that rage trip length and trip generation rates are different from develop the table. p length of 7.3 miles is longer than the average of 6 miles used tion planning in Palm Beach County. Since each Motorola trip than the County average, it will consume more gasoline and con- as tax revenues. Similarly, Motorola's higher generation rate t of industrial facility will generate more travel, more gas d more revenue. In contrast, the revenue from office-related 1 be reduced as Motorola's generation rate is lower than the ard rate for office space. The following equation is used to calculate the motor fuel tax credit: 31-14 __.....""'"'~...A -- ~ .. . motor fuel tax credit ~ credit rate from Table 6 x square feet of space x Motorola trip length standard trip length x . Motorola generation rate standard generation rate . The equation states that the cl'edit is calculated by multiplying the credit rate per square foot times the square footage of the facil ity, and multi ply; ng that result by the adjustment factor for average trip length and trip generation rate. . The credit for the 625,000 square feet main facility is: .I 7.3 miles Credit ~ $201/1,000 square feet x 625,000 square feet x 6.0 miles x .J 1.5.6 trip ends/l,OOO square fee~ ~ $397 394 6.0 trip ends/l,OOO square feet ' The credit for the 200,000 square feet of office space is: _i Cedit ~ $269/1,000 square feet x 7.3 miles 200,000 square feet x 6Tmiles x .J 15.6 trip ends/1,000 square feet ~ $54,002 20.0 trip ends/l,OOO square feet Total motor fuel tax credit is: $397,394 + $54,002 ~ $451,396 Finally, credit should be given for Motorola's share of improvements agreed to by Ri teca (Appendi x 31-B) if that agreement essentially remains in force. r10torol a shoul d I"eceive a credit for its pro rata share, based on traffi c genera- tion, of the dollar value of all improvements except the four-laning of N.W. 22nd Avenue which the ADA does not indicate is warranted before the year 2000. The value of the improvements specified in Sections III, IV, V and VI of the Riteco agreement 1S $259,000. Applying the ratio of Motorola's trips to Riteco's trips (13,020/22,400) to the value of the improvements results in a credit of $150,544. The net fiscal impact of Motorola's traffic is $1,583,726. This represents the cost associated with its traffic minus credits for property tax and gas tax revenues, and highway improvements provided by Motorola: Cost Property Tax Motor Fuel Tax Improvements $2,376,130 (191,610) (451 ,396) (150,544 ) $1,582,600 31-15 - - -- - . motor fuel tax credit = credit rate from Table 6 x . square feet of space x Motorola trip length standard trip length x . Motorola generation rate standard generation rate . The equation states that the cl'edit is calculated by multiplying the credit rate per square foot times the square footage of the facil ity, and multiplying that result by the adjustment factor for average trip length and trip generation rate. . The credit For the 625,000 square feet main facility is: . 7.3 mil es Credit = $20l!1 ,000 square feet x 625,000 square feet x ~o-miles x . 15 -'.Ltri P__~'ld2Ll_,OOO square feet = $397 394 6.0 trip ends!l,OOO square feet ' The credit for the 200,000 square feet of office space is: . Cedit = $269!1,000 square feet x 7.3 miles 200,000 square feet x 6.0nli les x . ]5.6 trip ends!l,OOO square feet = $54,00Z 20.0 trip ends!l,OOO square feet . Total motor fuel tax credit is: $397,394 + $54,002 = $451,396 . Finally, credit should be given for Motorola's share of improvements agreed to by Riteco (Appendi x 31-B) if that agreement essentially rema ins in force. . Motorola should receive a credit for its pro rata share, based on traffic genera- tion, of the dollar value of all improvements except the four-laning of N.W. 22nd Avenue which the ADA does not indicate is warranted before the year 2000. The value of the improvements specified in Sections III, IV, V and VI of the Riteco agreement is $259,000. Applying the ratio of ~otorola's trips to Riteco's trips (13,020/22,400) to the value of the improvements l'esults in a credit of $150,54t.. . - The net fiscal impact of t1otorola's traffic is $1,583,726. This represents the cost associated with its traffic minus credits for property tax and gas tax revenues, and highway improvements provided by Motorola: . . Cost Property Tax Motor Fuel Tax Improvements $2,376,130 (191,610) (451 ,396) (150,544) $1,582,600 - . 31-15 . The $1,582,600 represents the additional cost to government of meeting the highway impacts created by the Motorola project, over and above the direct revenues it generates for that purpose. ALTERNATE MODES Alternatives to the use of the privately owned automobile could serve to reduce Motorola's impact on surrounding highways. However, such alternatives are not currently under serious consideration. The site is not now served by bus. The nearest routes are along Boynton Road to Lawrence and north and south along Seacrest. Since some employees are anticipated to live near the Seacrest corridor, the possibility exists for expansion of that route to the plant. Unfortunately, this would not provide relief where it is most needed, i.e., along Congress Avenue. Although Motorola has made no provision for public transit, such pro- vision could be easily incorporated into the site's design. Due to the nature of the proposed facility, a promising alternative might be the encouragement of ridesharing by employees. The Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council has Jdopted the following policy with regard to the use of ridesharing and paratransit modes of transportation: "Encourage pub 1 i c agenci es and pri vate busi nesses to promote car pooling and van pooling through incentives such as priority parking areas, exclusive car pool/high occupancy vehicle lanes, provision of vehicles and support facilities, and insurance discounts." The applicant has indicated in the ADA that its Plantation facility has had a reasonably good rate of participation in car pooling, with an average of 1.3 persons per vehicle. Such programs can greatly reduce the number of trips gpnerated by a large employer, such as Motorola. Further, since the United States has become increasingly dependent on foreign oil supplies and, thus, susceptible to disruption of these sources, there is a need for both the private and public sectors to prepare not only contingency plans for such disruptions, but to also initiate ongoing energy conservation programs. Ridesharing offers great potential to meet that need. From discussions with the applicant, Motorola has active ridesharing programs, e.g., car pools, van pools, at some of their other facilities. Sharing rides is one of the most cost-effective energy conservation measures that can be implemented by private companies. Benefits to companies have been documented, to cite a few: 1. saving investment funds in land and parking facilities; 2. reducing employee absenteeism and tardiness; 3. expanding the potential labor market; 4. reducing traffic congestion at rush hours; 31-16 ~,'-.' ~ '. 'L:.~'. ., ;yp',".,-=:o,-,; - - -- . 5. minim'izing decreased facil ity operations during energy supply disruptions; . 6. creating an image as a positive community citizen. . Successful programs have strong support from their top level management; have assigned a specific individual the responsibility of coordinating the ride- sharing program (many times, someone in the personnel department); are actively promoted throughout the company; and pr'ovide incentives such as providing vehicles, preferential parking places and gifts, adjustments in \,ork hours (leaving a few minutes early to avoid rush), public recognition, . - SUW'IARY AND RECONMENDATION - The roadway system currently serving the proposed Motorola site is generally operating at acceptable levels, although Congress rWenup is right at capacity. Only Lantana and Hypoluxo Roads east of Congress Avenue are operating over capacity, - Projections of future traffic 'levels and roadway improvements indicate that traffic conditions will deteriorate as volumes grow faster than rOcdways can be improved. By the end of Phase I in 1981, volumes on all roads \'lill increase due to both the addition of Motorola traffic and to the growth of other facili- ties throughout the area. Since no improvements are scheduled, levels of service will generally decl ine. Congress Avenue will exceed capacity and experience a level of service D. - - By 1990, the end of Phase II, conditions will worsen considerably. Both Congress Avenue and Boynton Road will be seriously overloaded, \'Iit.h volumes upward of 85% over capacity. These conditions are projected to O'ccur although Congress is anticipated to be widened to four lanes and portions of Boynton Road are already six lanes. Projected volumES indicate Congress would need to be widened to at least six lanes before 1990. . - - By the completion of the project in the year 2000, conditions are projected to deteriorate further. Even with the addition of improvements planned for in the Year- 2000 Cost Feasible Plan, most roads in the vIcinity of the project will be operating at service level F, at least 25~ over capacity. Many roads will be closer to 50% over ca~dcity and Congress is projected to be at twice its capacity. Only a few links, most notably N.H. 22nd Avenue and Hypoluxo Road east of Congress, will be operating below capacity with service levels at C or better. The situation projected in the vicinity of Motorola is similar to that which is projected throughout Palm Beach County. Based on popuTation and land use pro- jections for the year 2000, two long-range transportation plans were adopted by the Metropolitan Planning Organization. The Year 2000 Needs Plan called for a high level of service and was projected to cost $900,000,000 in 1977 dollars. Projected revenues during the period to the year 2000 fell $331,000,000 short of the cost of the Needs Plan. A second plan, the Year 2000 Cost Feasible Plan, called for more modest improvements that would result in congestion and conditions similar to those of the Miami area today. Assuming no inflation, - - - - - - 31- ]7 . the Cost Feasible Plan approached financial feasibility but still fell 81 million dollars short of needs (Re ort on the Pro osed Palm Beach Count Fair Share Con- tribution for Road Improvements Ordinance, p.4. Clearly, growth in traffic is outstripping the County's ability to provide the facilities necessary to accom- modate the increased demand. As is true throughout the County in general, the Motorola project will create traffic demands, the cost of which will exceed the revenues generated by the project that will be available for transportation improvements. It is estimated (see FISCAL IMPACT under TRANSPORTATION) that Motorola will create the need for additional highway facilities which will cost almost 1.6 million dollars more than the revenues generated for roadway improvements. Although Motorola's traffic, in and of itself, will not be the cause of congested highways in the vicinity of the project, it will contribute to worsening the situation. Motorola's contribution to the transportation conditions can be mitigated through the provision of additional highway facilities to serve the demand created by Motorola. Increasing roadway capacity will promote a freer flow of traffic, which will also mitigate the impacts of the project on energy consumption and air quality by contributing to more efficient fuel use and the reduction in the generation of air pollutants. The impact of Motorola traffic on an already overloaded highway system, as well as on air quality and energy use, can be mitigated by the following conditions to the Development Order: 1. The following road and traffic improvements will be needed as the proposed project is developed by th2 applicant: a. The intersection of all project driveways with Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue shall be improved with left turn lanes, right turn lanes and traffic signals, as warranted by the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer. b. The intersection of Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue shall be improved with left turn lanes, right turn lanes and traffic signals, as warranted by the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer. c. The highway improvements described in the following sections of the agreement between Palm Beach County and Riteco Development Corporation, dated August 1, 1978, relating to traffic impacts of the proposed Sandhill project: Section III Section IV - Traffic signals; - Left turn 1 anes, N. vI. 22nd Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard; - Intersection on Congress Avenue and N.W. 2Znd Avenue; - Four-laning of Congress Avenue. Section V Section VI d. The widening of Congress Avenue between Boynton and Hypoluxo Roads to an ultimate six lanes, with the design level of service for highway planning designated by the Metropolitan Planning Organization. 31-18 .. """.'~.'~ .... .., - - In order to assist Palm Beach County, the State of Florida, and all other involved and responsible governmental agencies to timely and expeditiously plan for the engineering and construction required, and to budget for the acquisition of public or governmental funds for the construction of these roads and traffic improvements, the applicant shall give written notice to Palm Beach County of its intent to commence construction on any approved facility in the proposed project, not less than six months (and preferably one year), prior to the date upon which it proposes to commence "uch construction. 2. Motorola shall dedicate to Palm Beach County the following rights-of-way along Motorola's entire roadway frontage: Congress Avenue 60 feet from centerline; N.W. 22nd Avenue 60 feet from centerline. 3. The applicant shall establish and actively support a car pooling program. At the end of the first year of Phase I operations, Motorola shall provide a written report to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, the Metropolitan Planning Organization, the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer, and the City of Boynton Beach on its activities and an evaluation of their effectiveness. 4. Within one year of the commencement of Phase I operations, or any subsequent expansion of facilities, the applicant shall undertake a study of the feasi- bility of establishing or participating in a van pool program and shall transmit the results of that study to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, the Metropolitan Planning Organization, the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer, and the City of Boynton Beach. 5. Upon commencement of Phase I operations, or any subsequent expansion, the applicant shall provide the Palm Beach County Transportation Authority with information regarding the general location of its employees' residences and shall consult with the Authority regarding the feasibility of establishing or expanding routes to serve the plant. If bus service is provided to the plant, the applicant shall provide boarding and unloading space on-site or provide ~pace for turnout bays along Congress and N.W. 22nd Avenue, if needed. 31-19 . . .. . . . - - . . - - . . - - - .. . RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE There are six major parks (i.e., can be classified as urban~district or regional parks) over 100 acres in size within a nine-mile radius of the proposed project, where over 75% of its employees are expected to reside. Together, they offer almost 3,500 acres of recreational areas. Only the Palm Beach Pines State Park has no recreational facilities, at present. The other five parks are at least partially developed and offer a wide range of recreational opportunities, in- cluding boating, hiking, fishing, equestrian pursuits, tennis, etc. Dreher Park is a municipal recreational facility located in the City of West Palm Beach. Okeeheelee Park, John Prince Park, Lake Ida Park, and the Morikami County Park all are County recreational facilities. The closest major recrea- tion areas, John Prince Park and Lake Ida Park, are both 4-5 miles from the proposed project. Within nine miles of the project there are also eight public ocean beach facili- ties in the area, totaling almost 110 acres in size. In all, the recreational areas offer over 2.5 miles of public ocean beaches. The beach facilities include Phipps Ocean Park, County Land Beach, Lake Worth Beach, Lantana Municipal Beach, Ocean Ridge Beach, Boynton Public Beach, Delray Public Beach and the Delray South Beach. The Delray Public Beach includes the largest beachfront area (6,480 feet) and is only six miles southeast of the project. Motorola plans to provide a 5.B5-acre recreational area for its employees on the southeast corner of the site. The type of facilities to be constructed on the site are not yet determined. However, other Motorola plants provide tennis courts, volleyball courts, softball diamonds, and jogging trails. Each Motorola plant has recreational activities and programs which are financially supported by the firm and has organized a recreation committee to administer them. Tile company also contributes monies to cover the cost of such recreational items as uniforms, equipment, and related expenses. The applicant estimates that approximately one-third of its employees would participate in the company-sponsored recreational programs. No parks or open space area would be donated by the company to any of the local governmental entities. Applying recreational standards to the nine-mile area surrounding the project site, a sufficient amount of urban-district parks would appear to exist in the year 2000 if they are all adequately developed, However, at least two more miles of ocean beach swimming areas will be needed in the area by the year 2000 (one linear foot of beach per two users per day). In addition, at present there appears to be a shortage of community parks in the area also (Florida Department of Natural Resources 1976). The above statistics are significant when determining the recreational impacts of Motorola on the area. The nine-mile area, where 75% of the plant's projected employees will reside, includes a number of municipalities which are presently struggling with the problem of meeting recreational demands within their areas. Motorola's employees will create additional demands (recreational services) in these areas, yet only the City of Boynton Beach will receive direct economic benefits to offset the additional demands for services. 27 -1 - - - - . On the other hand, recreation demands employees on-site. to fruition. the project would be taking positive measures to reduce its in the area by providing recreational facilities for its Such measures are commendable and should be followed through . . In summary, the Motorola project can be expected to have mixed impacts on the area's recreational services, including the positive impacts of providing on-site recreational facilities for its employees. Negative recreational impacts can be expected to occur in the form of additional recreational service demands being placed on the surrounding area's localities as a result of Motorola without receiving any direct compensation from the firm to meet those increased demands. . . RECOM~1ENDATION . The negative impacts of Motorola can be adequately resolved by the following condition to the Development Order: 1. The applicant shall provide an easement along Congress Avenue and N.W. 22nd Avenue to accommodate a bikeway/pedestrian path, in accordance with the City's and Palm Beach CountJ.' s Comprehens i ve Pl ans. . . . . . . . . . . . - 27-2 -