AGENDA DOCUMENTS
~.".,. ---:
<
.,
AGENDA DOCUMENTS
L .. ..I,' '._e
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISS I
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 3. 1998
Eddy Estime with "Island Beat Band" to provide music at Black
Awareness Day
5. Proposed Resolution No. R9S-27 Re: Authorizing approval of an
entertainment agreement between the City of Boynton Beach and Annie
Murzike with" Jr. Drinkwater and the Thirst Ouenchers' to provide music
at Black Awareness Day
6. Proposed Resolution No. R9S-28 Re: Ratification of South
Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board action of
January 21,1998 as follows:
a. Authorization to expend on an emergency basis $2.500 from the
Sinking Fund to repair Hycore Press;
b. Authorization to increase the contract with R. J. Sullivan
Corporation for the construction of Grit Discharge System in the
Screening Building from $289.010 to $291.940 to cover $2.930 of
Change Orders and extend contract completion by 120 days;
c. Authorization to increase Ric Man's contract for the Northwest
Reuse Project from $2.535,701.75 to $2.573,516.79 to cover
$37,815.04 of Change Orders and extend the contract time by 18
days; ---
d. Authorization to increase J. J. Kirlin's contract for the Northwest
Reuse Project from $4,595.784 to $4,658.008 to cover $62,224 of
Change Orders and extend the contract time by 80 days; and
e. Authorization to expend on an emergency basis $25,000 from the
Sinking Fund to repair two (2) EO Motors and Blowers
D. Ratification of Planning & Development Board Action:
1. Shoppes of Woolbright PCD - Request for modification of the previously-
approved master plan to move the north property line between Home
Depot and the undeveloped property to the north 40' and to subdivide the
undeveloped property and vested square footage into a 3.99 acre parcel
with 49.106 square feet of retail and a 10.626 acre parcel with 108,004
square feet of retail
2. Shoppes of Woolbright - Home Depot Expo Design Center - Request to
construct 108,004 square feet of retail space on 10.626 acres within the
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD
Items D.1 and D.2 were moved to "Development Plans".
E. Approval of Bills
F. Approve refund on Cemetery Lots 470 A & B. Block S. at Boynton Beach
Memorial Park purchased by James J. Houlahan
G. Approve refund on Cemetery Lot 415 A. Block N, at Boynton Beach Memorial
Park purchased by Peter Castronova
6
MEE71NG MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 3,1998
H. Authorize Purchasing to conduct a Surplus/Confiscated and Unclaimed Items
Auction at the Warehouse
I. Approve special event request from Tiffany's Cabaret to host a motorcycle show
on February 15,1998 from 1~:00 Noon to 5:00 p.m. in their parking lot
J. Confirmation of David M. Griffith as the first choice firm to provide professional
services for a Classification and Compensation Study and authorization for staff
to negotiate a contract for those services
'.
Item "J" was removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion at the request of Commissioner
Tillman.
Motion
Vice Mayor Titcomb moved to approve the Consent Agenda with the exceptions of Item D in its
entirety and Item" J". Commissioner Tillman seconded the motion that carried unanimously.
Discussion Item:
J.
Confirmation of David M. Griffith as the first choice firm to provide
professional services for a Classification and Compensation Study and
authorization for staff to negotiate a contract for those services
.-
Commissioner Tillman asked for clarification of the criteria that was used to rank the six firms.
Dale Sugerman, Assistant City Manager, said the criteria used to evaluate the six firms was the
identical criteria approved by the Commission in the draft document. The 13 points that made
up the evaluation criteria are as follows:
1 . Successful experience in providing comparable classification and pay
plan services;
2. Experience in local government and similar projects;
3. Familiarity with South Florida employment trends, local government
issues, etc.
4. The experience and credentials of each member of the project team,
especially the project team leader;
5. Methodology and approach to accomplish all aspects of the study;
6. In-house capabilities and resources to provide support data and pertinent
information;
7. The proposed schedule and the ability to meet schedule requirements:
8. Highly positive'references within the past five years that include similar
studies in cities comparable to the City of Boynton Beach;
9. Written and verbal presentation of the project proposal with the project
leader in attendance at the presentation:
10. Demonstrated capabilities to initiate creative, innovative solutions to
resolve issues;
11 . Pricing of the component parts of the study;
,
,
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING HELD IN
COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, ON
TUESDAY, JANUARY 27,1998, AT 7:00 P.M.
PRESENT
Lee Wische. Chairrnan
Jirn Reed, Vice Chairrnan
Stan Dube
Pat Frazier
Mike Friedland
Maurice Rosenstock
Steve Myott, Alternate
Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning
Director
Bulent Kastarlak, Development Director
Michael Pawelczyk, Assistant City
Attorney
ABSENT
Jose Aguila
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairman Wische called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag was recited.
2. INTRODUCTION OF MAYOR, COMMISSIONERS AND BOARD MEMBERS
Chairman Wische introduced the members of the board, Attorney Pawelczyk, and the
Recording Secretary, and acknowledged the presence of Comrnissioner Shirley
Jaskiewicz and Vice Mayor Jarnie Titcornb in the audience.
3. AGENDA APPROVAL
No additions, deletions, or corrections were rnade to the agenda.
Motion
Mr. Dube moved to approve the agenda as subrnitted. Mr. Myott seconded the motion,
which carried unanimously.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
No additions, deletions, or corrections were rnade to the minutes of the last meeting.
..-.-.-,..- ~_.~~"' -... --,.,._..,.~-~~-~
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 27,1998
7. NEW BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing
Conditional Use
1.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Four Steel Communication Tower
Marda Zimring
Michael C. Desimone and Paul D. DeGrugillier
Approxirnately 275 feet south of Ocean Avenue
and west of 1-95
Request for conditional use approval to erect a
140 foot telecommunications tower on a vacant
lot.
Ms. Zirnring agreed to all the staff conditions.
At this tirne, Attorney Pawelczyk swore in all those who planned to testify on any item
on the agenda this evening. He rerninded everyone that each of the iterns on the
agenda this evening will be placed on the Consent Agenda for the City Cornrnission
rneeting. Therefore, this is the only opportunity to present all the evidence and
testirnony. etc. because the Cornmission is under no obligation to pull these iterns off
the Consent Agenda.
Chairrnan Wische opened the public hearing; however, no one in the audience wished
to address this itern.
Mr. Myott stated that in the text and at a previous meeting, the tower was represented
as 141 or 143 feet. However, on the plan it shows it as 161 feet. Ms. Zirnring advised
that it is going to be Iirnited to 140 feet and the plan subrnitted for building perrnits will
reflect that.
Mr. Myott inquired about the diameter of the pole. A gentlernan in the audience
advised that it is approxirnately 42 inches at the base and 12 to 15 inches at the top.
Ms. Heyden advised that the applicant rneets all the criteria for conditional use approval
and she recornmended approval of this request.
3
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 27, 1998
As previously discussed at another meeting, Mr. Kastarlak was interested in an auxiliary
use of this tower for other purposes. Ms. Zimring advised that the engineers were
present and they could speak to Mr. Kastarlak about this after the meeting.
Motion
Mr. Dube moved to approve the request for conditional use approval to erect a 140 foot
telecommunications tower on a vacant lot for Four Steel Communications, submit to
staff comments. Vice Chairman Reed seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously.
B. Subdivision
Master Plan Modification
1.
Project
Agent
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Boynton Commerce Center Planned
Industrial Development (PID)
Alan Gainsborg
Boynton Cornrnercenter, Limited Partnership
Corporate Drive
Request for rnodification of the previously
approved PID rnaster plan to combine parcels
3A, 3B and 3C and replace the four planned
office buildings, totaling 429,600 square feet,
with four warehouse/manufacturing/office
operation centers, totaling 134,259 square feet
and two future buildings totaling 72.420 square
feet.
With regard to the master plan modification, Mr. Gainsborg agreed to all of staffs
recornmendations. However, he pointed out that the square footages in the
recommendations are inaccurate based on sorne inaccurate data that was given to
staff. The total project will be 206.460 square feet. With regard to Phase 1 of the
project (Buildings A, B, C and D), the square footages on the site plan as subrnitted
were incorrect. Building A is 24.481 square feet. Building B is 43,225 square feet.
Building C as shown on the plan is 32,279 square feet, and Building D is 43,239 square
feet. Phase 2 of the project (Buildings E and F) will total 63,236 square feet.
4
MINUTES
PLANN!NG AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEET!NG
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 27,1998
Mr. Myott asked if this affects any of the comments. Ms. Heyden stated that she spelled
out the square footage for each building in comment 36: however, she will rnake those
adjustments.
Mr. Myott asked if the parking requirernents would still be met and Ms. Heyden
answered affirmatively.
Chairman Wische opened the public hearing; however, no one in the audience wished
to address this item.
Mr. Myott inquired about the elevation scheme and the wave. Mr. Gainsborg advised
that it is an adaptation of a park that was recently rehabbed in Broward County. He
cornbined the raised stucco band wave with the freestanding panel elevation.
Mr. Myott asked if the proposed color is the same color as the bands on the existing
building. Mr. Gainsborg advised that there is a different color scheme. The three
existing buildings will be repainted and other aesthetic work will be done to bring thern
into concert.
Motion
Vice Chairrnan Reed moved to approve the request for rnodification of the previously
approved PID rnaster plan to combine parcels 3A, 3B and 3C and replace the four
planned office buildings with four warehouse/manufacturing/office operation centers and
two future buildings, subject to staff comments. The total square footages of these
buildings was corrected by Mr. Gainsborg as stated in these rninutes. Mr. Dube
seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
C. Site Plans
New Site Plan
1.
Project:
Boynton Commerce Center, Operations
Centers "A", "B" and "C"
Alan Gainsborg
Boynton Cornmercenter, Limited Partnership
Corporate Drive
Request for site plan approval to construct four
warehouse/officelindustrial buildings on parcels
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
5
MINUTES
PLANN!NG AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEET!NG
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 27,1998
3A, 3B and 3C (4.61 acres) of the Boynton
Commerce Center PID.
Mr. Gainsborg agreed to all staff comments, with the exception of comment 36. He
advised that the correct square footages are as follows:
Building A
Building B
Building C
Building D
24,481 square feet
43,225 square feet
32,297 square feet
43,239 square feet
Comment 39 requests a Unity of Title on the four existing buildings. However, Boynton
Commercenter only owns three of those buildings. Therefore, he agreed to provide a
Unity of Title with parcels 3D, E and F, but not 3G. Ms, Heyden confirmed that this was
an error and that Mr. Gainsborg was correct.
Chairman Wische opened the public hearing; however, no one in the audience wished
to address this item.
Mr. Dube requested that Cypress Mulch not be used and Mr. Gainsborg agreed.
Motion
Mr. Dube rnoved to approve the request for site plan approval to construct four
warehouse/office/industrial buildings on parcels 3A, 3B and 3C (4.61 acres) of the
Boynton Commerce Center PID, subject to staff comments and the following:
.:. Comment 23 - that no Cypress mulch be used;
.:. Comment 36 - replace the square footages as corrected by Mr. Gainsborg;
and
.:. Comment 39 - Unity ofTitle be given on all but 3G.
Mr. Myott seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
6
.---..'.. .-------.----...--
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 27,1998
B. Subdivision
Master Plan Modification
Description:
Shop pes of Woolbright Planned
Commercial District (PCD)
Susan Prillaman
Howard Scharlin, Trustee
c/o Michael Morton
East and west sides of S.W. 8th Street, north of
Woolbright Road
Request for modification of the previously
approved master plan to move the north
property line between Horne Depot and the
undeveloped property to the north 40 feet north
and to subdivide the undeveloped property and
vested square footage into a 3.99 acre parcel
with 49,106 square feet of retail and a 10,626
acre with 108,004 square feet of retail. (If item
B.2 approved, proceed to item C.2.)
2.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
John Shern, Real Estate Manager for the Expo Division of the Home Depot in Atlanta
Georgia, referred to comrnent 3 and did not believe platting is required because after
the purchase and redistribution of the property, the resultant properties will only result in
two parcels. He displayed a drawing of the overall master plan to clarify this point.
Ms. Heyden still felt platting is required. Mr. Myott asked if it is a plat or a replat. Ms.
Heyden advised that it is a replat.
Mr. Shern reiterated that if the property resultant is two parcels or less, platting is
generally waived or required to be waived. He stated that platting would be a severe
time irnposition on the ability to go forward with this development.
It was Mr. Kastarlak's understanding that this particular review was to be conducted
frorn the very beginning under the PCD rules and regulations and review procedures.
This was rnade very clear to the owners and potential users because if it was not a PCD
and was something else, like a subdivision, there would have been a different type of
review. In the future, if there is a change frorn PCD to some other form of developrnent,
7
MINUTES
PLANNING .A.ND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEET!NG
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 27,1998
the review in front of the board this evening would not be valid and another review
would have to be done at that time.
Mr. Shern advised that this PCD is not being subdivided. He referred to the overall
rnaster plan that he displayed and stated that if the yellow portion is further subdivided
and the result is three or rnore parcels, then it would have to be replatted. However, at
the present tirne, there are only two parcels.
Mr. Kastarlak stated that if the area designated yellow is subdivided in the future, it will
no longer be a PCD. The area designated yellow will be extracted from the PCD and
the PCD will no longer exist. This applicant will have two lots separated by the area
designated yellow. He reiterated that whatever we do should be for the whole PCD.
The area designated yellow is not owned by Home Depot.
Mr. Shern did not know if this applicant can be held accountable for what might happen
or not happen in the future. He stated that the applicant is entering into a transaction
that will take a piece of property owned by one owner and create two parcels out of it.
He believes this is consistent and conforms to the policies and regulations of the City.
He did not believe that those policies or regulations require platting in this circumstance.
What may happen in the future to the applicant's parcel or the remaining parcel would
have to corne back to staff and the City for the appropriate determination of action. He
did not believe that this particular action at this particular time triggers that requirement.
Mr. Rosenstock was concerned about what would happen if this site plan is approved
this evening and the corporate owner of this property cornes back again. He wondered
if we are foreclosed frorn taking any action on the parcel designated in yellow in the
future.
Mr. Shern pointed out that wh8tever happens to that property in the future has to
conform to the rules and regulations of the City. He stated that there was a suggestion
that this applicant buy the rest of the property. Mr. Kastarlak commented that that
would be wonderful. Mr. Shern found that outrageous. He stated that he wants to buy
a piece of property in Boynton Beach to conduct his business and knows exactly what
he needs to conduct his business. He objected to buying rnore property and planning
somebody else' piece of property. He has prepared his rnaster plan consistent with his
building and consistent with the business he intends to conduct there. He did not know
why they were rnade to suffer the additional time necessary to go through the replatting
process when it does not seern to be consistent with any of the rules or policies of the
8
MINUTES
PLANNING AND OEVELOPMf:Nl' BOA~O MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 27,1998
City of Boynton Beach. He is trying to open a business by a date certain in October
1998.
Mr. Myott asked why this would affect the PCD designation and if PCDs can be
adjacent to each other. Mr. Kastarlak advised that this property can be turned into two
PCDs. However, they would have to operate on their own independent criteria.
Attorney Pawelczyk would like to look into the replatting issue further.
Mike Cavelli, a Certified Planner with Caulfield and Wheeler, stated that the PCD is a
zoning designation of the property. When you go through the PCD process, you
establish various criteria by which you are going to evaluate this site in terms of
setbacks, parking, and all the developrnent standards. You get some buffering
requirernents that under conventional zoning you normally would not have. You custorn
build an ordinance for a particular piece of property in a particular area that gives you
sorne latitude in terms of how that property is developed if it does not quite fit into a
conventional zoning type situation.
The subdivision regulations deal with platting, not the PCD. The PCD is merely a
developrnent tool by which you establish criteria to do a review. If that piece of property
needs to be platted, then you follow the platting regulations in terms of what has to be
on that docurnent, how that document is prepared and presented, and what is reviewed.
The only thing you are going to affect in the PCD by doing a plat is if there are any
minimum lot size requirements, access requirernents, specific drainage requirements, or
any other requirernents that are part of the regulation of the zoning. The plat is rnerely a
recordation of a graphic representation of a legal description.
If sornebody wants to develop only a section of the yellow area, they would have to
replat showing the number of parcels that are created in the yellow area. This does not
affect whether it is reviewed under a conventional zoning or a PCD zoning. No
application is filed to change the zoning. The issue of not knowing what is going to take
place there does not have any bearing on the PCD. Under the definition of subdivision
regulations, if it needs a plat, it is reviewed in terms of the State Statute requirements
and the City Code requirernents in terrns of the information that has to be on that plat.
That does not change the zoning. You still have the latitude to review that under the
standards of the PCD.
Mr. Kastarlak stated that it is not so rnuch a question of knowing what is going to
happen in the future. He pointed out that if there are separate guidelines for each one
9
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 27, 1998
of the parcels, there is no PCD. He was trying to preserve the unity of this entire
cornplex as one PCD.
Attorney Pawelczyk questioned if each parcel is reviewed under the PCD guidelines
and has to conform to those guidelines and if staff reviews those guidelines to assure
that they are in conformance with the zoning requirements. Mr. Kastarlak said they all
have to be under the one guideline established for this PCD.
Mr. Morton, one of the owners under the Howard Scharlin Trustee Agreement, gave a
brief history of the platting of this property. Mr. Kastarlak stated that platting is not the
issue. If the master plan is going to be changed every time a parcel comes into play, it
loses its meaning. The PCD is based on the master plan. The two of them go together.
If the master plan is modified every time sorneone comes in, then the rules of the PCD
are also being modified.
Mr. Shern was in favor of the City Attorney's Office reviewing the necessity of replatting
under these circurnstances. If there is an obligation to replat, he agreed to do so.
However, he did not want to be required to replat purely because he is asking for a
rnaster plan modification.
Chairman Wische opened the public hearing; however, no one in the audience wished
to address this item.
Motion
Mr. Dube moved to approve the request for modification of the previously approved
rnaster plan to move the north property line between Home Depot and the undeveloped
property to the north 40 feet north and to subdivide the undeveloped property and
vested square footage into a 3.99 acre parcel with 4r, 106 square feet of retail and a
10.626 acre with 108,004 square feet of retail, subject to staff cornrnents and subject to
review of the necessity for comrnent 3 by the City Attorney's Office and staff. Vice
Chairman Reed seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
C. Site Plans
New Site Plan
2.
Project:
Shoppes of Woolbright - Home Depot Expo
Design Center
10
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 27,1998
Description:
Susan Prillarnan
Howard Scharlin, Trustee
c/o Michael Morton
Southwest corner of unimproved Purple Heart
Way and the CSX railroad.
Request to construct 108,004 square feet of
retail space on 10.626 acres within the
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD.
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Mr. Shern stated that staff has been very helpful, cooperative, and responsive. With
regard to comment 16, he stated that the agreements between Mr. Morton and the City
are silent on the issue of the streetlights. It is his understanding that streetlights are
under a rnaster agreement with FPL and are not the responsibility of the developer.
Ms. Heyden did not verify whether or not the agreement referred to in comment 16
addresses streetlights. However, whenever a street extension is required, the
streetlights are required to be put in, The developer makes those arrangements, FPL
puts in the lights, and the City then pays for the energy and maintaining them in
perpetuity.
Mr. Shern addressed comrnents 20 and 27 and stated that he attempted to include a
sign package which is a compromise from the agreernent between Mr. Morton and the
City. The current situation allows for two signs to exist. He suggested eliminating one
of the signs and having a sign of the proportions noted in item 20. This sign would carry
all of the major tenants of the PCD and there would be no requirernent for the second
sign currently allowed.
Chairman Wische inquired about the size of the proposed sign. Mr. Shern advised that
the existing sign is about 8'7" wide and 30' tall. The proposed sign is 10' wide and 30'
tall. The existing sign is about 160' from the pavement. He found that there is no
proportional adjustment for distance from the road for sign age. In the agreement, there
is an additional sign that falls into this location. This eliminates the allowance for this
additional sign and incorporates the Horne Depot, the Expo, and the major tenants of
the PCD onto a monurnent sign 30' tall and 10' wide. With its base, the calculation
comes to 270' of signage. The alternative is to keep the existing sign, which is about
the same size, and add the additional sign elernents to the second sign. However, he
found this architecturally distracting. The purpose of the sign is to eliminate confusion
for people on this road before they have to rnake a decision. He wanted to combine all
11
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 27,1998
the information one would need to one location on a sign that is readable from the
street.
Mr. Shern requested permission to use the Expo national logo letter colors on the sign.
Of the four letters in the word, "Expo", two of the colors probably conforrn and two of
thern probably do not. Expo is a unit of Home Depot that is about to be rolled out
nationally to the tune of 200 stores. Boynton Beach has been selected for the third of
the true prototypes. This will be the subject of national advertising and national
exposure. It is very critical that the applicant be able to cornbine the advertising with the
signage and the store displays to provide for consistency.
Mr. Myott pointed out that the other three tenants could request that the colors of their
logo signs be allowed also. Mr. Shern stated that they would have to go through the
process and be reviewed.
Mr. Rosenstock questioned staff about the size of the sign. Ms. Heyden advised that
that existing sign is nonconforming. It falls under the amortization clause and would
have to be replaced in 1999. The sign would have to conform to a 10 foot setback, 160
square feet in size, and no taller than 20 feet.
Mr. Rosenstock felt the only reason the applicant wants the sign to be 10' x 30' is for
advertising purposes. Mr. Shern pointed out that the sign has to be read frorn over 160
feet, or 50 yards frorn the traveling surface. Mr. Shern was willing to put in the two
signs instead; however, he did not think that would be in the best interest of what the
City is trying to accomplish. He was offering an alternative which arnounts to less
square footage and less signage.
Attorney Pawelczyk advised that the applicant would have to apply for a sign variance.
In addition, in general, settlement agreernents must be amended by the L:ourt. Mr.
Shern withdrew his objection to cornrnent 20.
Mr. Shern referred to comment 24 and pointed out that this property is under easement
to the Florida Department of Transportation and he did not know if he had the right to
rnodify the vegetation on their easement. He expressed the same concern with
comment 25.
Mr. Rosenstock was disappointed with the way Home Depot has landscaped its
property. He suggested that the corporate officers or the people responsible look upon
12
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 27,1998
their comrnunity responsibility regarding landscaping and see what they can do to
improve it.
Ms. Heyden advised that Royal blue was contained in the original sign program.
Nothing else in that center is Royal blue, so we are going to lose one color.
She advised that we have been having some difficulty with Home Depot in getting them
to maintain their landscaping in the rear of their building. The City Forester has worked
on getting Home Depot to comply with their section of the buffer; therefore, this
applicant should not have any problems meeting comments 24 and 25. Mr. Shern
reiterated that he was not sure he had the right to do this. As long as he is able to do it,
hewil!.
Mr. Myott referred to comment 27 and asked if the approved sign prograrn could be
amended to include violet, pea-green, and two other colors that may not have been
used to date. He felt the Expo logo and the elevations of the building were attractive.
Ms. Heyden advised that Royal blue is the only color that is not currently being used.
She just wanted to bring to the board's attention that additional colors are being added.
There are now 12 colors. Mr. Morton advised that Royal blue will no longer be a color in
the program.
Discussion ensued regarding the size of signs. Ms. Heyden and Attorney Pawelczyk
explained that all nonconforming signs have to comply by December 31, 1999.
Therefore, any sign larger than 160 square feet will have to be taken down.
Mr. Dube referred to comrnent 28 regarding roof top equipment and commented that the
Home Depot rooftop can be seen from 1-95 and Woolbright Road and it is a rness.
Chairman Wische opened the public hearing; however, no one in the audience wished
to address this item.
Motion
Mr. Myott rnoved to approve the new site plan for the Home Depot Expo Center as
submitted, subject to staff comments in the supplemental handout at the meeting
tonight. Vice Chairman Reed seconded the motion.
Ms. Heyden asked if the Board wanted to delete comment 27 and allow the green and
violet colors. Mr. Myott added the following to the motion: That we include the green
13
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 27.1998
and violet as submitted on the sign drawings to be included in the sign criteria for the
development. He withdrew comment 27 in the handout. Vice Chairman Reed agreed
to the change to the motion.
The motion carried unanimously.
8. OTHER
None.
9. COMMENTS BY MEMBERS
None.
10. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the board, Mr. Rosenstock rnoved to
adjourn the meeting at 8:43 p.m. Ms. Frazier seconded the motion, which carried
unanimously.
-y //
G~. ~J.;/
.,~ .
Eve Eubanks
Recording Secretary
(Two Tapes)
14
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #97-327
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
TIIRU: C. Larry Roberts, Public Works Director
FROM: Mark A. Lips, Sanitation Foreman
SUBJ:
151 Review New Site Plan
Shoppes of Woolbright P.C.D.
DATE:
December 30, 1997
~~(' /~', "r,.'c-,,, I
fj \ \ : [ ). \ \,
;', '" .-...-'/ \"
I. ~ I' '.; ,...,> '
'-~/ \~ '/ I' . J
."-- "'-.i tJ
~-
Public Works has no comments. We recommend these plans to go
forward.
~u~
MAL/db
Attachments
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
i\
: n 1
. 'OJ
: ~ \
:'i1
~U
i~ ~iU~ i!
I:
':
i
I
ro 8 1
t2 !~~ , "j
--:; ,.,.
TO:
Tambri j. Heyden
AICP. Planning and
Zoning Director
DATE:
12/30/97
i
,
FILE! NW~=~~D
SUBJECT:
New Site Plan Shoppes of Woolbright PCD Home
Depot Expo
Development Depattment Memo PZ 97-605
None
FROM:
Ofe. ROb~
REFERENCES:
ENCLOSURES:
My comments reference this New Site Plan arc as fhllows:
l. The parking area on the south side of the new structure creates an unsafe condition. 111e plaeement of the spaces requires persons
leaving the spaces to back out into a travcllane.
2. Handicap parking access areas must be striped in accordance with current code.
3. [cnncur with the modification of the southern entrance from SW 8'" St. However, the intersection as shown on the plans is
unsafe. This intersl'Ction must be a three way stop for north, south, and east travel.
......"... ~.,
/,/-.,," l/....
1((
\ "
--/.... '<..
',---,/ '....
r--- "0. \"" F':r
-" \.',/;'
\! "
;, ~ ,------
); I .
-j J
.,
i!
iJ