REVIEW COMMENTS
f[LL J.
M~ !\f15T-tt I}L/SP
4 ~-h~
r
" .
:)
::<1Jr ~~~~"L
.~~.~~ 4~
. /JL ~ ~
0r: - ~ ~~f0--u/~r~
I' _ - -....__ /I ,,-I;-~:. ~
~ /,/~...,...'tJ -
-k~YH~.?
".--..----.---.. .
~ :
_.._.--~
.~
-
,_._---"'"-
..;-t~
~{E.1(!'~~"'"
. , ~u)G;~
f~~o~ '
~- (J.h~4Y1.
~~f?/
~!o 01 ~
~~.
~l4-rt ~
-iI.L ~~ .
(ru- j.A~) ~
t1..6t'.U1<2.,p.~J ) ~
i~ MvI- ML
9/2/97 Commission discussion of revisions to Milnor settlement agreement (aka ~ ~
Alhambra Square North and South) - Southeast and northeast corners ofWollbright and!{fj;_1
~~ ~.~
if 't.e~~
IL<U iIA! _~ ~
~.
UI.tdtll.L..-f:t
I
./P fM/~,
('4
. . D.
~~~I-
d;'C/J/1.A- ~
-"---
L..
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-442
TO:
Jim Cherof
City Attorney
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP (JII;~~
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
August 22, 1997
SUBJECT:
If you are preparing any back up or agenda memorandum, for the above with respect to the Walgreen's
use and the type of buffering for the ARC project (an ACLF), please include the attached letter which
explains the buffer issue (wall vs, vegetation), Staff has no concerns with the requested buffer change.
J~+ 1.Jg<,-ru-'!L
" )f-t.
j)A.J.-~!! .'
~. , U- p-~ 0tJ.-.f-
o-~J ,;;-{:tr--
ih--<:-"'"-,v J)..-J-
J,-v'&' - ~ I(<..J..- l.
. -{ju., 't -r'
t.t-~ e~"!
I. _. ..,," J-....." u
, '''L/rr u.., ., ".-
;....~;.;... ,0-' . tw' /If- ~ --/.
. ~ . '- --,:,
f7 ,,_' -'I. ;un......
, It". 1"./,$; h'j" tt. JAe' ih,:r j,kLL- .
'i"~ 1MV' .' , .J- - - r'- __ . ,j
."" . ~ {J I'-v"~' f -c." ~-,";
Ju..cv-<- '..~/tJ d. ;/ffr-,'h'L ~.JJ-:,
"" l t. .~:..v....:
/ {1;wW-" c ~
1MP€ _~ -ftC',,_1
.fL+<-jf-. cJ!
(j/\j. .~. ,L,J.. rlj
)0) !/~ ~ ,y. f J.,
nYL. /, vi- ,Ai
'clJA
Gvv{<.1- _
fe';J.~ . . _,..d.,..L<.-
"P""'7J '.
d ,V',vqCCJ. -fi, c~,
-rl'-'"' "..../1 J
;! ft-{-- " ,rf;1(;:..d-A
)-)() rIA- , 4t~.
.J1H-- (
1J<v[./{. If ,-t' (lJU- -ilJ .
~.1~""'" :;,tf;':i:_~__.
(
'-
TJH:dim
Attachment
WPlPROlECTSIARC at Boynton BeachINWSPlagenda memo attach. CA.doc
',-,
\I 1/ }-
./ 1 'J. ':/.-
/(\t\/-)I ,'n'h' (ILL-"
kit, )_J. J J 'eLI' ,(-J',,/cl
i~ !G ,r' I d
Ji,C' '(.1 '1'1 , .1J-lI1 v .i--"'
\ T f c. , C1fI} , *-,1
. . - ( (.j
" . 'I I.- . >J ,~ \'
- Yl'-
. (Ll. ~& Q -(!/-'1"
-. C~ ,v "
, '\, .
.,' I
.1... ., ,!)..-, f 'n^-"
1)1. "lJv' ~ " ';,
., '.,t&"A ,JI; iJ/1 Jv Q'
\ UJC/\ n Ai
,) IP~)1 e,-I e ~I / )
!J. / \ I' \ 1
~..'\J.. . \ ' .b1 ·
v{ lIlle
I
'.......
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-442
FROM:
Jim Cherof
City Attorney
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP (Ji/idt.'",
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
August 22, 1997
SUBJECT:
9/2/97 Commission discussion of revisions to Milnor settlement agreement (aka
Alhambra Square North and South) - Southeast and northeast corners ofWollbrignt and
Golf Road
If you are preparing any back up or agenda memorandum, for the above with respect to the Walgreen's
use and the type of buffering for the ARC project (an ACLF), please include the attached letter which
explains the buffer issue (wall vs, vegetation), Staff has no concerns with the requested buffer change,
TJH:dim
Attachment
WP\PROJECTS\ARC at Boynton Beach\NWSP\agenda memo attach - CA. doc
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM
TO: Tambi Heyden, Planing and Zoning Director
FROM:
Kevin John Hallahan ,Forester / Environmentalist J<. ) If
Alhambra North
RE:
DATE:
August 4, 1997
There are no comments on this project. The plans should continue in the normal review process,
kjh
!rnl rCtfT liY"iCr".
"v,1 ...--..--... ','
. , ' ~ ;
',I n' '," .
,J i I I ~ W ! i
dli'l M!C - IC07 I
, ,~.,...J i " ~ ..." '
t,_
I,~r,;mw~l
IlI1J AUr; 4 1997 : '
i PLANNrr-~GAr.fD-"-"~'
"'" ZGNrfJ(; !/.;::r
__~_...._~~ '.'.L"...._. ..."" ....
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-192
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning
FROM:
Al Newbold, Deputy Director of Development
~
d ,'A" '
DATE:
July 31,1997
ALHAMBRA SQUARE NORTH - NEW SITE PLAN 2ND REVIEW
RE:
We recommend approval of the above referenced project subject to the following comments,
Building Division
I, On the site plan place a note indicating that the required handicapped accessible path leading
to the entrances of both buildings from the abutting public right-of-way and each
handicapped parking space will be designed and constructed in compliance with the
regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section
4.1,2, III (I) thru (4). Where applicable, speeity with notes on the plan the location of the
required curb cut ramps and built up ramps,
2, Where applicable, provide the following information on the Paving and Drainage Plan:
a) Show the location of the handicapped accessible curb cut ramp(s) and built up ramps.
b) Provide a detail drawing of the built up ramps,
c) Specify the finish grade elevations and/or slope of the accessible paths required to
both buildings from the abutting right-of-way and the handicapped parking spaces,
d) Identity the finish floor elevation of each building.
Note: All drawings, dimensions, surface finishes, clevations and slopes shall comply with
the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building
Construction, Section 4, 1 .2. III (I) thru (4).
3, Based on the detail drawings submitted for the free standing site sign found on sheet A5,1,
omit Note Number 2 found on the site plan drawing,
4, The 1 73,851 1 square foot proposed free standing sign shown on the site plan and illustrated
on sheet A5,I exceeds the 64 square foot maximum sign area allowed by the sign code,
Amend the drawings to show the sign area in compliance with the regulations of the sign
code, [Chapter 21 - Sign Code, Article TV, Section 2]
5, The 25 foot tall proposed free standing sign shown on sheet A5,I exceeds the 20 foot
maximum sign height. Reduce the height of the sign to comply with the regulations of the
sign code, [Chapter 21 - Sign Code, Article TV, Section 2]
6, Amend all plan view drawings of the site to show the location of the site sign meeting the
minimum setback dimensions identified in the sign code. [Chapter 21 - Sign Code, Article
Ill, Section 5]
7. The dimensions of the building signage (west building) illustrated on sheet A2,I indicate the
635 (plus) square feet of proposed sign area exceeds the 154,5 square feet of maximum sign
area allowed by the sign code, Amend the drawings to depict the total sign area in
compliance with the regulations of the sign code, [Chapter 21 - Sign Code, Article IV,
Section 2]
Department of Development Memorandum No, 97-193
Re: Alhambra Square North - New Site Plan 2n" Review
July 31, 1997
Page #2
8, All signs that are shown erected upon a parapet wall that extends above the roofline are
prohibited signs, Therefore to show compliance with the sign code all proposed signs that
arc shown above the roof line shall be removed or relocated below the roof line, [Chapter 21
- Sign Code, Article II, Section 3 and Chapter I - General Provisions, Article 11, definition of
Roof Sign]
9, At time of site plan review building signage is required to be submitted and reviewed for
compliance with the applicable codes. Because the applicant did not provide detail drawings
of the signage proposed for the east building the applicant shall place a note on the elevation
view drawing of the east building indicating that no building signage will be installed on the
building or provide a note stating that a subsequent site plan approval is required for building
slgnage,
10, Permit plans for the proposed project shall comply with the applicable Building, Energy and
Accessibility Code, [Chapter 20 - Building, Housing and Construction Regulations]
Engineering Division
I. Replace egress arrows exiting onto SW 23'" Avenue with right and left turn arrows,
[Chapter 4, Section 7,B,2.]
2, Add stop bar and stop sign at the southbound center driving lane between Building A and
Building B at the southernmost end of traffic divider (this will allow for northbound traffic to
crossover and enter the drive thru). [Chapter 4, Section 7,B.2,]
3, Remove yellow cross hatch median and replace with concrete curb to separate driving lanes
from drive thru lanes, [Chapter 4, Section 7.B.2,]
4, Provide signage and striping at northeast comer of Building A to prevent traffic from
entering the drive through from the wrong direction, [Chapter 4, Section 7,B.2,]
5, All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of
application, These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting, paving,
drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices, Permits required from
agencies such as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DEP, L WDD and any other permitting agency shall
be included with your permit request.
6, Entrance to SW 23'" Avenue is 39 feet wide which is greater than maximum allowable of32
feet. Need to obtain approval from the Director of Development. [Chapter 23, Article
II.H,I.]
7. Provide the City of Boynton Beach Engineering Department with Palm Beach County Traffic
Division letter for traffic study.
8, Show 6" thick concrete sidewalks thru both driveways. [Chapter 23, Article II, Section P,]
9, Provide location and details offrre lanes. [Chapter 23, Article II.M,]
10. Remove both stop bars/signs for southbound traffic along the eastern parking area and the
one for westbound traffic at the SW comer of the site for efficient traffic flow,
II, At the driveway on Congress A venue change the straight-thru arrow to a right turn arrow
and install a one way arrow sign in the median.
Department of Development Memorandum No, 97-193
Re: Alhambra Square North - New Site Plan 2nd Review
July 3],1997
Page #3
12, Revise dumpster plan view eliminating block wall in the front to provide a elear, unobstructed
opening of at least twenty feet.
13, At both egress driveways add dual 6' solid, yellow stripes 25 feet back from the stop bars to
delineate traffic lanes,
AN/ck
xc: Mike Haag
Sebastian Puda
Ken Hall
()~~
attachment: Eng. Division Plans
C:\My Documents\Alhambra North., New Site Plan 2nd.doc
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO, 97-368
TO:
Jim Cherof
City Attorney
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP ~~J~'/ci,..r
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
July 16, 1997
SUBJECT:
1990 Milnor settlement agreement vs, current development proposal for Alhambra
Square North (northeast comer of Congress Avenue and Golf Road)
The applicant for the above project called my office today, He stated that he received a response
from you regarding the pending legal question relative to a proposed drug store use (with drive-
through) on the above C-I zoned parcel. He further stated that you are taking a revised
agreement to the Commission on August 5, 1997, Please be advised that the proposed drug store
also requires a small scale land use amendment and rezoning to C-2,
TJH:dim
Xc: Kerry Willis, City Manager
Al Newbold, Acting Development Services Director
Mike Haag, Building Code Permit Administrator
Jerzy Lewicki, Acting Senior Planner
Vanessa Llera, Plans Review Technician
J:ISHRDA T A IPlanninglSHAREDI WPICORRESPlCITY A TIY\1990 Milnr agrement.doc
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT, NO, 97 - 258
b ~ ml ~. (f~>- -'~~;1
I D1I -." <^-
I "\
I nlll
Ii', .m I
,.,.,,,; PIJIIIJ_
j
..,,""....''"-,..
TO:
Tambri Heyden,
P~ and Zoning Director
00Jooo A, Guidry,
Utilities Director
FROM:
DATE:
July 31, 1997
SUBJECT: Alhambra North,
New Site Plan - Second Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offers the following conunents:
1) Palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utilities easements, Canopy
trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those
utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future,(Sec, 7.5-18.1)
2) Dept, of Health permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this
project, (Sec, 26-12)
3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of
1500 g,p,m, (LDR chap, 6, Art, , Sec, 16), or the requirement imposed by insurance
underwriters, whichever is greater. (Sec. 26-16(a))
4) A capacity reservation fee will be due for this project upon my request for signature on
the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval. This fee will be
determined based upon final meter size.(Sec. 26-34(E))
5) City water may not be used for irrigation where other sources are readily
available,(Comp Plan policy 3C,3.4)
It is our reconunendation that the plan proceed through the review process,
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at ext. 6407 or
Peter Mazzella at ext, 6404,
Sm! Alham2
xc: Skip Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #97-168
@ r:~'"~ -~J~--~m
I I' !" n
IwuL.'~""_~"~,.!('j7 I U
" Pl!INNiNG A~
, ZONING DEPI
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director I D VI
C, Larry Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer tv v
THRU:
FROM:
Mark Lips, Sanitation Foreman
SUBJ:
New Site Plan - 2nd Review - Alhambra North
DATE:
July 28, 1997
The Public Works Department has no further comments at this time and recommend the
project go forward for approval to the Planning & Development Board.
~Cl4
Mark Lips
Sanitation Foreman
MLlcr
Cll i OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORID....
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: T AMBRI HEYDEN DATE:
PLANNING AND
ZONING
SUBJECT:
FROM: OFFICER RIGGLE REFERENCES:
ENCLOSURES:
07/24/97
FILE:
NWSW97-014
2nd REVIEW NEW SITE PLAN ALHAMBRA__ .'
NORTH(ON THE RUN)"
~.'_."''f
, \
i
'I JUl ?'~
I, Handicap pavement markings arc not in accordance with code,
",,--_.
2, There are no pavement markings to show direction of intended travel through the drive through,
3. I would recommend that the purposed "yellow cross hatch median" be installed as a raised concrete
median, If this is only painted, it will allow for the patrons of this plaza to invent their own route of travel
through the parking area, People will travel this shortest route and will drive over the "median" if it is only
painted, This will present an unsafe situation between these buildings for vehicles and especially for
pedestrians,
4. I recommend that strict attention be paid to D,O.T, guidelines in reference to Line of Sight for the ingress
and egress on both roadways.
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-3
~NNING AptND
ONING DE
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ;jA..J
Alhambra North cf
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
July 23, 1997
There are no comments to this project. The project should continue in the normal
review process,
JW:ad
~
,~
l'
"
FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION
Memorandum No, 97-278
TO: Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning & Zoning Division
FROM:
William D. Cavanaugh, Act. FPO II ~ I ill
Fire - Rescue Department /~
DATE: July 22, 1997
SUBJECT: Alhambra North (Walgreen's)
Congress Ave, & Golf Rd.
NWSP 97-014
We have no objections at this time.
CC: Deputy Chief Ness
File
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-393
TO:
Larry Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Mike Haag, Building Division
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utility Dept. Chief Field Insp,
Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
John Wildner, Park Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Sebastian Pudah, Engineering Division
Tambri J, Heyden, AICP /fJ P
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
July 22, 1997
SUBJECT:
Agent:
File No,:
New Site Plan - 2nd Review
Project: Alhambra North
Location: Northeast corner of Congress Avenue and S,W. 23'd
Avenue (Golf Road)
Malek & Associates
NWSP 97-014
Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced project for your
final review and recommendation, Please review this amended site plan submittal to
determine if the plans have been adjusted to satisfy the comments previously made by
your department.
If your comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of
building permit, please advise this office in writing. If your comments have not
been met, please indicate this in writing to my office.
Finally, include in your memorandum a recommendation as to whether the project
should be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for consideration, Please
return your memorandum and the amended plans (Building Division shall keep
their plans) to Planning and Zoning by 5:00 P.M. on Wednesday July 30,1997.
If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to call Jerzy
Lewicki at Extension 6260, who is coordinating the review of this project.
Page 2
Alhambra North
File No. NWSP 97-014
T JH:bme
Attachment
cc: (Memo only)
Kerry Willis
Charlie Frederick
Marshall Gage
John Guidry
William Bingham
AI Newbold
Central File
J:\SHRDA T A IPlanning\SHAREDlAlhambra NorthINWSP\2NDREVIEW-PLANS.doc
DE"ELvPMENT SERVICES DEPARTM.:IIt I
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-273
TO:
Kerry Willis, City Manager
Milan Knor, Development Services Director
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept. Chief Field Insp.
Larry Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
AI Newbold, Deputy Director of Development
Ken Hall, Development Division
John Yeend, Development Division
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP 1J~1L
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
June 17, 1997
RE:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1 S1 Review - New Site Plan
Project - Alhambra North (Walgreens)
Location - Northeast corner of Congress Avenue and S.W, 23rd Avenue (Golf
Road).
Agent - Malek & Associates
File No, - NWSP 97-014
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please
review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments to the Director of
Planning and Zoning no later than 5:00 P.M. on June 25. 1997. When preparing your
comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code
sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project.
If you believe the plans are substantially complete with regard to code compliance and
that your outstanding comments and/or recommendations may be addressed at time of
rectification of the master plan following City Commission approval, rather than requiring
the applicant to prepare amended plans for a 2nd submittal, indicate in your 1st review
written comments that you recommend the request proceed to the Planning and
Development Board and City Commission for approval. If you recommend the request
move forward for approval with one review, please attach the 1st review plans to your
written comments (Building Division may retain their set of plans as control plans for the
project).
-~, ..-.~-----_.,'--_._- ~--~-_._--~----
Page 2
Alhambra North (Walgreens)
TO: TRC Members
RE: Planning and Zoning Memo 97-273
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable
the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter
3, Master Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to
review and formulate comments,
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete,
however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to
properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the
documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be
requested by the reviewer by contacting Jerzy Lewicki.
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the
documents.
4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans
depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements
may conflict with other departmental improvements.
5, When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review
responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review
comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the
review specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within
the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director. The memorandum shall
state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans
submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the
approval process,
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and
Zoning Division for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of
the reviewer on this memorandum. Jerzy Lewicki will be the Planning and Zoning staff member
coordinating the review of the project.
Planning and Zoning staff will send the applicant a cover letter which includes the comment(s)
and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for
resubmission. When Planning and Zoning staff receives the amended plans, we will distribute
the plans with a cover memorandum to all TRC Members for review and approval.
Page 3
Alhambra North (Walgreens)
TO: TRC Members
RE: Planning and Zoning Memo 97-273
As a point of information, a legal determination is pending regarding the proposed use versus the
1990 settlement ag reement.
T JH:bme
Attachment
xc: (Memo Only)
William Bingham, Fire Chief
Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Marshall Gage, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Central File
s:\projectsIALHAMBRA NORTH\NWSP\1streview.plans
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-321
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Oirector
t~"
FROM:
Jerzy Lewicki
DATE: June 30, 1997
SUBJECT: New Site Plan - 1st Review
Project: Alhambra North
Location: Northeast corner of Congress Avenue and S.W, 23rd Avenue
(Golf Road)
Agent: Malek and Associates
File No,: NWSP 97-014
The following is a list of comments regarding the first review of the above-referenced project. It should be
noted that the comments include recommendations we believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of
the project.
The comments that identify deficiencies from the City's Land Development Regulations (L.D.R.) or
previous conditions of approval are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or
documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan
review process.
The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan review are subject to
additional comments. I recommend that the applicanUagent contact this office regarding questions related
to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies or deficiencies from
previous conditions of approval and they request that the project remain on the review schedule identified
he/she should contact this office regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline
dates for seeking relief from the code requirement or previous condition of approval.
1. With the second submittal provide a clause on the survey stating that the property
was abstracted for all easements, right-of-ways and utility lines, as required by
LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.A.
2. Provide a statement on the site plan that no part of the subject site will be sold,
detached or otherwise separated from the original tract of land without the City of
Boynton Beach approval of a subdivision plat.
3, Provide lighting details showing shields diverting light from shining towards the
residential properties located to the north and to the east of the site.
4. Proposed buffer wall shell be setback, at minimum, at the distance of 2 feet from
the northern and eastern property lines, as required by the LOR, Chapter 2, Section
4.L.
5. Indicate finish material of the proposed 6 feet high buffer wall in conformance with
LOR, Chapter 9, Section 10, Paragraph C.3.
Page 2
Memorandum No. 97-321
1st Review - New Site Plan
Alhambra North
NWSP 97-014
DRAFT
6. Provide accent shrubs spaced 2 feet o,c, on three sides of the dumpster enclosure
as required by the LOR, Chapter 7,5, Article II, Section 5.J.
7. On the site plan show traffic control markings within the vehicular system of the
development, as required by LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.8,2.
8. Show and dimension required and proposed setbacks of all structures as required
by LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.8.1.
9. With the second submittal include an unmounted drawing showing color elevations
of both proposed buildings as required by LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7,0,2,
10. Include with your submittal a presentation board containing samples of all major
exterior building materials as required by LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.0.1,
11. On the elevation drawings depict color codes and manufacturer's names of all
exterior finishes, as required by LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7,0,1,
12. It is recommended that, in order to achieve architectural compatibility of both
proposed structures, a mansard roof covered with roof tiles will be introduced for
the Walgreen's building.
13. Indicate roof finish material on the entrance and drive-thru feature of the Walgreens
building.
14. On the Landscape Plan, Sheet L-1, amend the tabular summary of the planting
material to include a "landscape material required by the code" category, Also,
provide relevant calculations for this category. For the landscape buffer adjacent to
the right-of way and along abutting properties, provide perimeter distances of the
parcel for which the landscape buffer material is being calculated (Chapter 7.5,
Article II - Landscape Code).
15. Incorporate the above calculation into the tabulation of the landscape material
provided for the site, All native species shall be distinguished from non-native
species with a recognizable symbol. Note, that the native requirement is fifty
percent of the required landscape planting (Comprehensive Plan Policy 4.4.6).
16. On the landscape plan, sheet 1-1, indicate all existing and proposed easements as
to avoid potential conflicts with the utility lines and proposed structures.
17. Oenote the height of both structures as required by LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.8.1.
Page 3
Memorandum No. 97-321
I st Review - New Site Plan
Alhambra North
NWSP 97-014
DRAFr
18. Provide Leisureville Homeowners Association approval of the proposed buffer wall,
as warranted by Settlement and Stipulated Agreement.
19. Indicate on the survey and the landscape plan the existing buffer hedge located
along the northern and eastern property lines. On the landscape make a note that
the existing buffer hedge will be removed prior to the construction of the buffer wall,
as warranted by Settlement and Stipulated Agreement.
20. Make a comment on the site plan that the site will not be illuminated past 11 :00 PM,
as provided for in the Settlement and Stipulated Agreement.
21. Provide a traffic study for the proposed development as required the LOR. No
building permit will be issued until the traffic study is evaluated by the Palm Beach
County Traffic Division,
22. With the second submittal provide floor plans of both proposed structures as
required by LOR, Chapter 4., Section 7,0,1
23. Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Section 7,8.2 requires that signage
information consistent with Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 10. I. and
Chapter 21 - Sign Code, Article IV, Section 7 is provided at the time of site plan
submittal. If the signage information will not be submitted with the second
submittal, another formal submittal will be required and be reviewed by the
Planning and Development Board prior to sign permits being issued for the
proposed development.
24. Any roof top equipment will have to be screened from view at a distance of 600
feet. If such equipment is planned, indicate its location and the height of the
equipment above the roof level. Provide elevations of the structure showing the
roof top equipment and the required screening (all reduced to a small scale) and
draw in on these elevations the lines-of-sight connecting the highest point of the
equipment with the eye level from a distance of 600 hundred feet from the building
(LOR, Chapter 9, Section 11,E),
25. Delineate the location(s) of a loading zone(s) in accordance with LOR, Chapter 2 -
Zoning, Section 11.J,1
26. Delineate on the site plan the stacking lane of 75 fete as required by the code.
25. On the Landscape Plan include a notation regarding the anticipated method of
irrigation.
Page 4
Memorandum No. 97-321
1 st Review - New Site Plan
Alhambra North
NWSP 97-014
DRAFT
26, In accordance with LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.E, amend your site plan tabulation
to include the following:
A. net buildable land area in acres and feet (net buildable land area is the
area of the lot within the required setback lines)
B. other paved areas (paved area other than vehicular use area)
C, total lot coverage (total lot coverage is a sum of building coverage and all
hard surface pavement coverage)
D. height of the building.
xc: Central File
s:\planning\sharred\wp\projects\alhambra north\151 review alhambra north
POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO.
97-0041
f@Tfr"\'i lli-.r.'.-l~
"-;1011
tiJ~~2 7 './
-" ,.-.1 I'
.... --'. "";."..'.....""-----,,-.........;,..........
~~J_'-""""
TO:
FROM:
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT ;p:f-
JUNE 25,1997
ALHAMBRA NORTH(WALGREENS)-NEW SITE PLAN_1st RE.
DATE:
RE:
I have reviewed the above plans and have the following comments/recommendations:
-Attached is a sectional of the plans that I recommend additional pavement striping and signs,
This is concerning the driving area between the two buildings that also has the drive-thru of
Walgrccns, I feel the additional striping and signs will prevent any wrong traveling in the drive-
thru,
-The landscape plans do not show any plants or shrubbery projected for the 6 foot islands at both
ingress/egress of the property, I would like to know what will fill this area, If any plants or
shrubbery is to be planted. I recommend that it be a species that not grow over one foot in height
in order to maintain a clear line of sight.
~2~:'~~
--..--1
Plfl..r~:';\ <',Y
1(illJ.t.,~
.,I,....~
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #97-131
THRU:
Tambri 1. Heyden, AICP, Planning & Zoning Director
Carel Fisher, Deputy Public Works Director ~
TO:
FROM:
Mark Lips, Sanitation Foreman
SUBJ:
New Site Plan - 1st Review - Alhambra North (Walgreens)
DATE:
June 24, 1997
The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site plan, The project
should proceed to the Planning and Development Board and City Commission for
approval.
~#Jt(~
Mark Lips
Sanitation Foreman
ML/cr
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-287
JUN 2 3 9Jl
uoo
PlANNING AND
ZONIN DEPT.
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks superintendenr
Alhambra North (Walgreens)
TO:
RE:
Date:
June 23, 1997
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the plans for Alhambra North
(Walgreens). There are no recreation related comments, The plan may continue
through the normal review process,
JW
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM
1m
TO:
Tambi Heyden, Planing and Zoning Director
Kevin John Hallahan ,Forester / Environmentalist /!..!J ~
Alhambra North (Walgreens)
New Site Plan-1st
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
June 23,1997
, IE r'
-,; 1
.251991 d
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPT.
1. There are no existing trees issues on the site. The project should continue in the normal
review process,
\
fP K
\ \ \
z;ft"J\-
~of~ - -jf', U 0 "\
f1(o ~N ~-Jj-";!(.'- \~
-=- ~~-7 -474.39'
-== --:::::;;;:..::.- ---+- - <:.
~,~~--:-"
, ':~.... \
~'i
,t,
'\- .
:.' ~ \
. '\~;\Ht, 'i:', ~..,~
'lh' ti' ", .\.' \',
, ;',,;.'~'" *, . ~ " ~ t.
'0'"
.,l "
.... .\....
~~
~;,
<;1'0' BA.2 "II'
SIT',.! ;
" I
(t~\
\'0\
\
\
~
1 I -' ~
~t~~~ iL-' " ~; "' '(,\ (\ "
"'I>~ I · , . ~~ dA' ~ s.:; ·
1---~L-j> I~ .. t -~L
\ I II \
~ ~I \
I
I
/
~'l-'I
M-
, S I uN "fi \
\ \ \ \
I \\
~of \ 11 111" if'
I I, \
Ii
\
\
o
i
\
\
\
IJ.oI
-0 n.-
1\
--{ .{
I
\
\
---~
\
6'
I
\
0,\
~\
\
\
,
~-- ---
\
\@\ \ \
\
-r- ev7vo;;;-~;- -~- ..\
\ PROPOSED 2 STORY \,
\ BUILDING, ' .
\ 15 r r,oOR 'J.080 50 FT, ,\
:Or....L 26.'60 50. rr ,
..,~ - .... --'-'--- ~-_.+-
5
~ZO'
"
\',
~ I
'. t" :r\I,; ~~,
,
, ~>~
, ',', ;,\
, .' Ii
J.
\ II
\@)\
'"i" ,
, I ~",',t~,.., "
\ ,.j "
~ "'~~:\' ~
I" \':,\\ .'1
.' ",t
-~~\
.rt
r'
J
\ '! -J
~ I /1",:
,tJ::)' ,~'(
\-' \ I'
~ ' '
1.TO;' &~ v J/6A.l
, ..
r-i
~'\
\.
I
~.....
I~ "
-;...h
! ('~ i
I'-'=:' \
.,:
CGNCS -rue"'- '~E tr' -,
5' CQt.C ~Ai..j( I
~ _~~~_c ~.~~. .' ,
~, ;::
,~_ ~ _ . L . L-.J
EDGE or "~\'1G! -". -;0 "7'''77.:'
......-,.~
------~..- - ~ ,~
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT, NO, 97 - 200
li!'v 2 i
.............'
DATE:
Tambri Heyden,
Planning and Zoning Director
John A, Guidry, \\., /
Utilities Director ~ \J Y
June 26, 1997
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Alhambra North
New Site Plan - First Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offers the following comments:
1) Dept.of Health permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this
project, (Sec, 26-12)
2) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of
1500 g.p,m. (LDR chap, 6, Art. , Sec, 16), or the requirement imposed by insurance
underwriters, whichever is greater. (Sec, 26-16(a))
3) A capacity reservation fee will be due for this project upon my request for signature on
the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval. This fee
will be determined based upon final meter size. (Sec, 26-34(E))
4) Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within
utilities easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings,
using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate
instrument to the City. (Sec, 26-33(a))
5) Appropriate backflow preventers shall be required on the domestic water service to the
Medical office building,
6) City water may not be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available,
(Comp, Plan policy 3C,3.4)
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process,
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at ext.6407 or
Peter Mazzella at ext.6404,
Gb/Sm/ alambra
xc: Skip Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION
Memorandum No. 97-263
Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning & Zoning Division
William D, Cavanaugh, Act. FPO II J1 ) ~
Fire Rescue Department luJ~
June 26, 1997
Alhambra North (Walgreens)
Congress Ave. & Golf Rd.
NWSP 97-014
We have no objections at this time.
CC: Deputy Chief Ness
File
\1 ~ \1 ~ ~ \~ ~\\
W~ nfI ~
\uU JDti 1. 11l'i"
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-151
/.rnlo l~ - @- (C-
I~~~-...
iln.d Jlt-I.
I '~J I. ~ ;
,'--- .,
{
~"'""'-" '" .
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning
Milan M, Knor, P.E" Director of Development V
FROM:
DATE:
June 30, 1997
RE:
ALHAMBRA SQUARE NORTH - NEW SITE PLAN 1ST REVIEW
We have reviewed the subject plans and offer the following comments:
Building Division
I. The site plan and the other plan view drawings of the site do not indicate the location of the
handicapped accessible path that is required between the handicapped accessible entrances to
both buildings and the existing sidewalk located within the abutting public right-of-way,
Amend the plans to identitY the location of the accessible path including specitYing the width
and grade elevations of the path consistent with the regulations of the Accessibility Code,
[Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4,1.2,1II (1) thru (4)]
2, The submittal does not include the location size, height, color, style or type of sign proposed
for the site, however all proposed signage is required at site plan review. Amend the plans to
include sign specifications for site signage in compliance with the code regulations or place a
note on the plan indicating that no site signage will be installed, [Chapter 9 - Community
Design Plan, Section 10.1 and Chapter 21 - Sign Code]
3, To ensure the total area of the proposed building signage for the west building complies with
the code identitY the dimension of all proposed signs, The maximum total sign area for the
west building is 154,5 square feet. Amend the plans to show the building signage in
compliance with the regulations of the sign code, [Chapter 21 - Sign Code, Article IV, Section
2,C,]
4. Either place a note on the elevation view drawing of the cast building indicating that no
building signage will be installed or provide detail specifications for the building signage in
compliance with the regulations of the City codes, [Chapter 21 - Sign Code and Chapter 9 -
Community Design Plan, Section 10.1.]
Engineering Division
These comments are provided based on Chapter 4 of the City's Land Development Regulations,
Site Plan Review, There may be other code deficiencies or details on the plans which will be
addressed at time of permit application,
I, Regarding traffic control markings and signage, Section 7,8.2,
a, Add FDOT approved "Right Turn Only" signs on egress stop signs,
b, Install FOOT approved "one-way" arrow signs within both medians,
c. Install stop bars and signs at the appropriate internal egress aisles for safe, efficient flow
of traffic including exiting drive-thru traffic.
Department of Dcvelopment Memorandum No, 97-151
Re: Alhambra Square North - Ncw Sit Plan I ,( Review
June 30, 1997
Page #2
2, Show elevations, flow arrows, pretreatment facilities and quantity calculations meeting City
drainagc standards, [Section 7.F.]
3. Locate and dimension the loading space for the two story building, [Section 7,E,5.]
Recommendations
I, Since the front of the two story building has a 13' walkway, consider a two or three foot
landscape area along thc front width of the building,
2, Consider extending the sidewalks along the front of both buildings two additional feet to act as
a continuous wheel stop in lieu of individual wheel stops,
3. In lieu of a raiscd 6" curb delineating thc drive-thru area, consider a yellow cross-hatch,
paintcd median to avoid possible wheel impacts.
4. Avoid large canopy trees at light locations to rcduce future parking lot shadowing.
5. Due to cross ovcr conflict between cars entering the drive-thru phannacy and southbound
traffic on thc two story building side, we recommend the following: align the south entrance
ingress lane with the landscaped island to the north, Extend and align thc landscaped island to
the west with the egress lane of the entrance, and provide pavement striping to delineate where
phannacy traffic can turn to enter the drive-thru (see attached sketch).
Recommend that the applicant provide a sccond submittal to address thc subject comments and
recommendations,
MMK:MH/ck
attachment
xc: Mike Haag
Ken Hall
C:\My Documents\Alhambra North 1st Review.doc
WED 14:39 FAX 561 375 6185
" ---...
: S/G-lIl 1t
I !I
I i I Ii
02N,~.'l1_}j1t, J
i r'-'
, II t
I,V
I
"7' t.'i '
, ../,"
of
1 ~ '!' R'~,' 'J'
, '0.+" .
, I ''''''!<'
%"O,f? ,P.JI.rr2,' -----, -L" ,. U' 0 \! CO.'IC5".,C" '1[,", [XIS;~'"
_;. '.... \\ j' CO/l4C NA...I( ro's~
~ ~H --:!) ,/ "'~- \~ ' 'C <
--,'-' ~) --, ,. '474.39' '<_,~, '~-:::::~";::::::_c~:.-..:~,........:.. ,': .',~. '.
.:..:...- " ~' ___---L.___--.".___.-:-===--, I
--, __. ,.... . /~~.:....... -,' '.' ...,'.,....' .I'.:_.:':'i~..
...........,j. ,.----,- T--~' .' "1 .
~O" '" .'
- ...F 01" P':' \ .^I~ _ , :" :::'"j ";.'-:
.. ~,
. .~..
06/25/97
I:':;}:;~\~~~ii:;
;"
. ':;':~'" ' ~ - '""
-'-;::';"'" ':.
. -l j,' ~:' , . ,:
1;~~,' ~ ::'i.Uj,H'~'~~ ;;" i; ,:,l \t) ~~ ~: . ,
.'~}~l~~U'...',.'~,..,,~h,:,,:
; ril" B. ~fJ" 81i~::~:'
f lL.t r'L,rJ',:'';:~\'
I I L
-Et @j..~" ,
I@I I@:
I -' I : I','
I ' I".,
'::rel 8,
SI:6N
,
l('-=:-'"
l\~
....i..-
t;re' 8A12 .....
s';6N'1
1(7;\
'II / ,I
'-"' ,
,
~of
~~
(;
I
\
I
i
I
,
,
0-----'=0--
1
,
V
... 1
'/],0' , I
t~~
,
.
"0 1: ./:"1/
"
//' ~
'........
\
1'", "
--{ -'f
" i
-I.... ..- 't
I WI&OIN,47 ,pi
I PROPOS€O'2. STORY
I BUlf.;OlNG .
1 rsr '~J.O"R 'J,OBO SQ. ,.-.,. ,
..j..-.___..:orA~,~:~~~,,~_J
, .
BOYNTON BEACH PD
I I J
I ..L.. i
"
;
7'
6'
1
0"1,
~
,
I'
"
t I II] -
II ','\.
1
.>r
~
;'" i
i.. :
HC (,I HC
--40
~~
~9
~,
I
g-
I I i
~~ i~':
1-' I I
.1TllA & I< ...
,
,
I
I~
.
+10.' t
, ,
-$1'"
,~
A.,
i I S; ~ I
1\-' I
, ,
I-
!
I
101
I I
, .
ltioos
t+\
I I
, ,
"
! '
,
':.
. , :' ~
.,., :
~ ,.' . ",
. '~3,;:
, !~,
'"
~2C'
j
r..
(.1
, "
1/ I
-
-+-
!
r-,
~i
.t1
r?1, ? '
! ' i
I
.'
v.
".i,' :!1
J'~~ ",
. ~ '~"
~'88
:1',
,i U j
n n - 2 ';07 i V j
" " .: i.:.J
L.__ "-.l
PLt\i,!:,,!:',!C /\:m
...,-1Q:J.lliQ OFPr.
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
~~^'-)
13081 MILITARY TRAIL
DELRA Y BEACH. FLORIDA 33484
June 30, 1997
Tambri 1. Heyden, AICP
Director Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Dear Ms. Heyden:
Subject: Technical Review Committee Agenda - Julu 1, 1997
The Lake Worth Drainage District offers the following comments regarding the item(s) on
the meeting agenda:
I. Alhambra Square North - The LWDD has no objection to the referenced project
request. This project is located in the LWDD Service Area and will require a
drainage permit.
As always, we thank you for being given the opportunity to comment.
Sincerely,
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
~~~
ChiefInspector
SJW/mfb
c: Ronald L. Crone, P.E., P.L.S., Assistant Manager, LWDD
Patrick A. Martin, P.E., District Engineer, LWDD
BOYTECH.REVBOYTECHREV
Delray Beach & Boca Raton (561) 498-5363. Boynton Beach & West Palm Beach (561) 737-3835 . Fax (561) 495-9694
Board 01 Supervisors
C. Stanley Weaver
Kermit Dell
John I. Witwarth III
Secretary/Manager
William G. Winters
Assistant Manager
Ronald L. Crone
Attomey
Perry & Schone, PA
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Proposed Walgreens - Alhambra Square North - NWSP 97-014
Proposed Use: 13,905 sq, ft. drug store with 2 drive-thru lanes,
Current Zoning: "C-l, Office and Professional District"
Issue: The proposed Walgreens drug store is not a permitted
use within the C-l District.
Analysis and Findings:
. The stated purpose and intent of the C-l District is to "provide appropriate space for
office and professional uses, located to provide ready access to such services for
all." A drug store is not considered an office or professional use, The practice of
pharmacy by a licensed pharmacist is considered a professional use.
. The proposed 13,905 square foot Walgreens store is identified as "PROPOSED
DRUG STORE" on the site plan submitted to the City for approval,
. "Drug store" is not listed in the permitted or conditional uses of the C-I Zoning
District regulations (Chapter 2, Section 6,A, I. on Pages 2-29 and 2-30 of the City
of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations),
. "Drug store" is first listed as a permitted use in the "C-2, Neighborhood
Commercial District" and is limited to a maximum floor area of 10,000 square feet
in that district. Uses permitted in the C-2 District are also permitted in the C-3 and
C-4 Districts without limitation on floor area.
. The applicant is requesting that the proposed Walgreens store be classified as a
"pharmacy", which is listed as a permitted use in the C-I District.
Page I of 4
.
The proposed Walgreens store does contain a permitted "pharmacy"; however, the
proposed store would contain several other uses specifically regulated by the Code
that are not permitted in the C- I District. The floor plan submitted to the City for
approval shows that the permitted "pharmacy" use would occupy approximately
1060 square feet of the proposed 13,905 square foot building, or only 7.6% of the
total proposed floor area, Other specifically regulated uses identified on the
proposed floor plan that are not permitted in the C-I District include:
Drive-thro
Photo finishing,
Greeting card sales,
Beverage sales,
Newspaper and magazine sales,
Cosmetics sales, and
Food sales.
Other regulated uses that are not specifically identified on the proposed floor plan,
but are customarily found in a Walgreens store and are also not permitted in the C-
I District include:
Camera and supply sales,
Sporting goods and toy sales,
Office supply sales,
Art, craft and sewing supply sales,
Curio, souvenir and gift sales,
Tobacco sales,
Clothing sales,
Sundries, notions and variety sales, and
Radio, video and stereo equipment and supply sales.
Page 2 of 4
. The proposed "pharmacy" use cannot be considered the principal use of the
proposed Walgreens building. The floor plan submitted to the City for approval
clearly shows that the "pharmacy" use is labeled as a "department" in the Walgreens
store and would occupy only a very small percentage of the total floor area.
. Most of the uses depicted on the proposed Walgreens store floor plan are clearly
not consistent with the stated purpose and intent of the C-l District, which is to
provide space for office and professional uses, The only retail uses listed as
permitted uses in the C-I District are specifically related to serving office and
medical uses, Retail sales of a wide variety of general consumer merchandise such
as depicted on the proposed Walgreens store floor plan cannot be characterized as
serving office and professional uses,
. The wording of the permitted use listing in the C-I District regulations provides
clear direction for the intended interpretation of the term "pharmacy", The listing
"Pharmacies, medical and surgical supplies; orthopedic, invalid and convalescent
supplies; eyeglasses and hearing aids" describes a very narrow range of medical-
related products, It is clearly the intent that the term "pharmacy" in the context of
this listing refers only to the practice of pharmacy and the dispensing of
pharmaceuticals, not to a multi-department "drug store", Even the Walgreens floor
plan makes a distinction between the "pharmacy" and the "general sales" areas of
the proposed drug store, The intended meaning of the term "pharmacy" is further
reinforced by the fact that the City's zoning regulations consistently list "pharmacy"
and "drug store" as separate uses.
. The interpretation of the term "pharmacy" being requested by the applicant for the
proposed Walgreens store would result in any general retail establishment with a
pharmacy, including mega-stores such as WalMart and Albertsons, in addition to
drug stores such as Eckerds, being regulated as "pharmacy" uses, rather than as
"department store", "grocery store" or "drug store" uses. Stores such as Walgreens
and Eckerds today are stretching the limits of even the term "drug store", The
majority of the floor area in newer stores is devoted to the sale of general and
seasonal merchandise, not to drugs and health-related products,
Page 3 of 4
. In addition to the fact that "drug store" is not listed as a permitted use, the proposed
"drive-thru" is also not a permitted use in the C- I District. Only financial
institutions are permitted to have a drive-through facility in the C- I District. The
City's zoning regulations treat drive-thru facilities for uses other than financial
institutions as a separate use, Drive-thru facilities for retail uses and personal
services are allowed in the C-2 District subject to conditional use approval and in
the C-3 and C-4 Districts.
Page 4 of 4