REVIEW COMMENTS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM 90-209
TO: Jay D. Mussman, Assistant city Attorney
FROM: Timothy P. Cannon, Interim Planning Director
DATE: June 26, 1990
SUBJECT: Alhambra Scruare- Declaration of Covenants and
Restrictions
In response to your memorandum dated June 22, 1990 (copy
attached), please be advised that the Planning Department has no
objections with the conditions in the Declaration that are above
and beyond the Agreement or that refine conditions of the
Agreement. However, any provisions in the Declaration that
contradict the Agreement should be deleted from the Declaration.
~ );? ~/~
. Timo y P. Cannon
TPC:ccc
Enclosure
cc: City Manager
Central File
JUN-22-'90 15:04 ID:JOSIA5 AHD GOREH
TEL fIO:305-771-4923
~845 P06
To; James J. Golden
Senior City Planner
F ronu
Timothy P. Cannon
Interim Planning Dir~otor
3ay D. MUllllMan
AlIsistant City Attorney
ReI
Alhambra Square - Dealar.~ion of Covenant. and Re8~riotiong
(hereinafter nDealaration") and Stipulation and Settlement
Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement")
June 22, 1990
Date.
This memorandum is in response
relative to the above captioned
comments regarding the Declaration
to your Memorandum Number 90151
matter. The following are our
and Agreement.
The Declaration and Agreement contain the following inconsistenciesl
1) The Agreement does not provide tor any type ot building set baCk
requirements frOm any property lines.
2) The Agreement provides that all dumpsters shall be located away
from adjacent residential aress however the Declaration provides that
no dumpster shall be located directly adjacent to sinale family
residential areas. As a result, the Declaration shall be amended to
read in accordance with the Agreement.
3) The Agreement provides on Page 4 that construction of the six (6)
foot zoning boundary wall shall be coordinated with the governing
association of th~ adjacent residential property and existing buffer
head shall be removed and replaced with the sod and landscaping to the
specifications of the governing association and at no cost to the
governing association.
4) The Declaration provides that all utilities shall be installed
und~r9round howev~r the S~1pulation does not provide for same.
5) The wall made reference to and defined on Page 5 of the Agreement
relating to Alhambra Square South and Alhambra Square ACLF dO"'lI not:
-- -
RECEIVED
dUN 25 i~G;"
PbANNING tl~f3f:
JUI,-22-'90 15:05 ID:JOSIAS AIID GOREH
TEL 110:305-77.1-4923
~845 F"07
provide for the height of the wall. Aocordingly any reference to the
he1ght shall be deleted and be in acoordance with the Agreement.
6) The Deolaration provides on Pages 3 and 4. Paragraph (e)(7) that
if a plan and I or specification is SUbmitted for approval and if no
written objection to same is delivered within thirl:y (30) daya from
the date thereof, it shall be deemed, to have been approved. There i.
no such reference made in the Agreement and aooordingly eame ahould be
deleted.
7) ArHole IV of the Declllration should be amended l:o l:rack the
language of Paragraph 11 of l:he Agreement.
S) Article VII of the Oeclaration doea not track the language of tbe
Agreement and accordingly .hall be deleted in 1l:8 entirety except tor
the reference that l:he DeolaraHon ehall run with the land for the
benefi~ of the City and all adjacent property owners and shall be 1n
perpetuity.
g) paq. 1 of the Deolaration .pe~ifi~ally ll1akes reterence to the
governing .ssoclations and in this regard it, Is unclear whether
Golfview RatbOur Homeowners Association and Golfvlew Barbour Estates,
Ino., AS reflected in the Declaration 18 the same as those entities
desctibed in the Agreement, which states Golfview Harbour and Golfview
Barbour Estates. Accordingly, we need additional clarifioation
regarding theee entities and if they are the same and if so, what are
their correct namee.
The oeclaral:1on must be consistent and In accord with the Aqreement,
ae the Agreement Is a binding, legally enforceable Stipulation
previously entered into.
Upon your review of the above, please contact me 80 that we may
discuss this In greater detail. I have been in contact with Robert A.
BIsen, Esquire and lie is very anxious to coopeute with the City in
order to facilItate the nece8sary modifications of the Declarsl:ion and
to complete this matter.
Respectfully BubBitted,
lp::sMAN
Assistant City Attorn.y
CCI J. Scott Miller, City Manager
JDM!jmw
l'IIellos/alhalllbra
Pllg8 2 of 2
,
JUN-22-'90 15:04 ID:JOSIRS RND GOREN
TEL NO:305-771-4923
11845 P06
TOI James J. Golden
Senior City Planner
Timothy P. Cannon
Interim Planning nirQctor
F rOllll
3ay D. MUllllman
Assi.tant City Attorney
Re.
Alhambra Square - Declaration of Cov.nants and Relltrictionll
(hereinafter "Declaration") and Stipulation and Settlement
Agreement (hereinafter "Agr.ement")
June 22, 1990
Date.
Thia memorandum ia in response to your Memorandum Number 90l5l
relative to the ,above captioned matter. The fallowing are our
commente regarding the Declaration and Agreement.
The Declaration and Agreement contain the tollowing inoonsistenciesl
1) The Agreement does not provide for any type Of building set baCk
requirements fr~m any property l1nes.
2) The Agreement provides that all dumpsters shall be located away
from adjacent residential areas however the Declaration provides that
no dumpster shall be located directly adjacent ,to sinGle family
residential areas. As a result, the Declaration shall be amended to
read in accordance with the Agreement.
J) The Agreement provides on Page 4 that oonstruction of the six (6)
foot zoning boundary wall shall be coordinated with the governing
association of the adjacent residential property and existing buffer
head shall be removed and replaced with the sod and landscaping to the
specifications of the governing association and at no cost to the
governing association.
4) The Declaration provides that all utilities allall be installed
underground however the stipulation does not provide for same.
5) Tbe wall mada raference to and defined on Page 5 of the Agreement
relating to Alhallbra Square Soutb and Alhambra Square ACLP doeR not
..,
RECEIVED
JUN 25 191)
PLANNING OlPf.
JUN-22-'90 15:05 ID:JOS1AS AND GOREN
TEL NO: 305-77.J -4923
"845 P07
proqide for the height of ~he wall. Aooordin91y any referonae to the
beight shall be deleted and be in aocordance with the Agree.ent.
6) The Declaration provides on Pages 3 and 4. Paragraph [C)(?) that
if a plan and / or specifioation is SUbmitted for approval and if no
written objeotion to same is delivered within thirty (30) daYII from
the da~e thereof, it shall be deemed. to have been approved. There ie
no Buch reference made in the Agreement and aocordingly eame should be
deleted.
7) ArHcle IV of the Decluation .hould b. amended to track the
language of Para9raph II of the Agreement:.
8) Article VII of the Deolaration dOes not track the language of the
Agreement and acoordingly ehall be deleted in it. entirety except for
the reference that the DealaraHon IIhall nil ...H.h the !Dna tor the
benefit of the City and all adjaoent property owners and shall be in
perpl!t:uity.
91 paqa 1 of the Deolaration specifically lI1/Skes reterenoe to the
governing a..ooiatione and in thie regerd it,1s unolear whether
Golfvi.", Barbour BOllleowners A815oclation and Golfview BU'bour Estates,
Ina., a. refleoted in the Declaration 1s the same as those entities
desoribed in the Agreement, which states Goltview Barbour and GOlfview
Barbour Estates. Aooordingly, we need additional olarification
regarding these entities and if they are the same and if so, what are
their oorrect names.
The Declaretion must be consistent and in accord with the Agreement,
es the Agreement is a binding, legally enforceable Stipulation
previously entered into.
upon your review of the above, pleaa. oontact 11141 so that we may
discuss this in greater detail. I have been In contact with Robert A.
Btsen, Bsquire and he is very anxious to cooperllte with the City in
order to faoilitate the necessary modifications of the Declaration and
to complete this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
~f;::SMAN
Assistant City Attorney
CCI J. Scott Miller, City Manager
JDM!jmw
lIellol/alhambra
Page 2 of 2
,
M E M 0 RAN DUM
December 30, 1988
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: ALHAMBRA SQUARE ACLF-CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION
The pUblic hearing for the above-referenced application was
continued at the December 15, 1988 special meeting of the
Planning and Zoning Board, as the site plan was determined to be
incomplete by the Technical Review Board. The applicant did not
resubmit the site plan for review by the Technical Review Board
at the December 19, 1988 deadline owing to the fact that there
were only four days between the special meeting date and the
December 19th deadline to revise and resubmit the site plan
documents. In addition, the applicant is awaiting the outcome of
the public hearing before the City commission on January 4, 1989
for the land use element amendment/rezoning request which, if
approved, will enable the applicant to further pursue the
Conditional Use application.
If the City commission approves the land use element/rezoning
application, it is recommended that the public hearing be
continued to the February l4, 1989 meeting at 7:30 p.m.
Otherwise, this item should be deleted from the agenda.
...
c.. ,~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZI~ - --
CSA:ro
cc Central File
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
DATE: December 28, 1988
FROM: Sue Kruse
Deputy City Clerk
RE: City Commission Meeting
of January 4, 1989
Attached please find a letter received from the Cedarwood Villas
Homeowners Association supporting the applications submitted by
Norman J. Michael and Milnor Corporation, scheduled to be heard
by the City Commission on January 4.
~/.~
smk
Attachment
cc: City Attorney
City Manager
Mayor & City Commission
.
R"ECn1\Toi.D,
,1=(', 2,8 'l~
, \1'2?~"
~
MEMORANDUM
10 December 1988
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Zoning Board
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato
Planning Director
RE:
Alhambra square South
Land Use Amendment/Rezoning Request
Summary: Charles Putman & Associates, Inc., agent for Norman and
Elishka Michael, property owners, is requesting that the Future
Land Use Element for a 4.368 acre parcel be amended from "Low
Density Residential" to "Office Commercial" and that this parcel
be rezoned from R-1AA to C-1 (Office/Professional). The parcel
is located at the southeast corner of South Congress Avenue and
Golf Road (S.W. 23rd Avenue) and has a 335 frontage on Congress
Avenue and a 500 foot frontage on Golf Road. On December 16,
1986, the City adopted the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and
Appraisal Report (Ordinance No. 86-54) which amended the Future
Land Use Element for this parcel from "Moderate Density
Residential" to "Low Density Residential." The proposed use of
this proeprty, if rezoned, would be to develop it for aJ57,800
square foot professional/medical office complex including a
financial institution with a drive-through facility (see attached
conceptual site plan).
Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq (see attached location map):
Abutting the subject parcel to the north is the 80 foot wide
right-of-way for Golf Road. Further to the north, across Golf
Road, is a 4.0l acre vacant parcel zoned R-1AA (PUD). An
application has been submitted for this parcel which proposes
that the Future Land Use Element be amended from "Moderate
Density Residential" to "Office Commercial" and that this parcel
be rezoned from R-1AA (PUD) to C-1 (Office/Professional) for the
purpose of constructing a 66,600 square foot professional/medical
office complex (Alhambra Square North) similar to that proposed
for this parcel (Alhambra Square South). To the northeast,
across Golf Road, is the Leisureville Planned Unit
Development.Abutting the subject parcel to the east is a five
acre parcel zoned R-1AA (Single-Family Residential) which is
currently vacant and is under the same property ownership. An
application has been submitted for this parcel which proposes
that the Future Land Use Element be amended from "Low Density
Residential" to "High Density Residential" and that this parcel
be rezoned from R-1AA to R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) for the
purpose of seeking Conditional Use approval for an Adult
Congregate Living Facility (Alhambra Square ACLF). Abutting the
subject parcel to the south is a 100 foot wide right-of-way for
the L.W.D.D. L-27 Canal (Lazy Lake Waterway). Further to the
south, across the canal right-of-way, is the Gulfview Harbor
Estates development. These are 1 and 2 story mUltiple-family
dwelling units zoned R-3. Abutting the subject parcel to the
west is the 120 foot wide right-of-way for Congress Avenue.
Further to the west, across Congress Avenue, is the Silverlake
Estates development. This project is a planned unit development
(PUD) approved under the name "Cranbrook Lake Estates." To the
northwest, across Congress Avenue, is an 1l.74 acre vacant parcel
which lies within the Quail Lake Planned Unit Development. Site
plans for this parcel were previously approved under the names
"Savannah Place" and "Sutton Place." The former site plan has
since expired and the latter site plan was withdrawn by the
property owner shortly after approval.
-2-
Present Zoning: The present R-IAA zoning would allow for the
development of about 20 single-family lots. The R-1AA zoning
requires a minimum 8,000 square foot lot with a 75 foot frontage.
These lots could be developed so as to face away from
Congress Avenue and Golf Road, and in fact, Palm Beach County and
City policies would prohibit residential driveways on these two
thoroughfares. Access could be provided to the property by a
local street connection to Golf Road or to S.W. 13th Street, if
the eastern parcel is utilized.
Rezoninq: Rezoning to C-l, Office/Professional, would permit
professional or office buildings up to two stories height (25
feet) or up to 30 feet if under-building parking is utilized.
Uses permitted in the C-1 zoning district include churches,
financial institutions, funeral homes, governmental facilities,
hospitals, medical/professional offices, nursing and convalescent
homes, pharmacies, veterinary offices and clinics, nursery
schools, instruction or tutoring, academic schools, and copying
service. Nursery schools and instruction or tutoring greater
than 2,000 square feet in floor area require Conditional Use
approval. The rear and side yard setbacks abutting the
residential properties to the south and east would be 30 feet. A
six foot buffer wall or hedge two feet in height at time of
planting and maintained at a height of six feet would also be
required along these property lines. The applicant proposes to
build a 57,800 square foot professional/medical office complex
including a financial institution with a drive-through facility.
Under the City's development regulations, a maximum of about
76,000 square feet of office floor space could be built on the
parcel if under building parking is utilized. Approval of this
rezoning request would also set a precedent for the commercial
rezoning of the vacant parcel abutting this parcel on the east
side and the two vacant parcels located at the northeast and
northwest corners of the intersection.
Comprehensive Plan-Future Land Use Map: The property in question
is currently shown on the Future Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan as "Low Density Residential," so an amendment
to the Future Land Use Element to "Office Commercial," as
requested by the applicant would be necessary.
Comprehensive Plan-Text: The following Comprehensive Plan
policies are relevant to this rezoning request.
"Provide a suitable living environment in all neighborhoods."
(p.6)
"Provide a range of land use types to accommodate a full range of
services and activities." (p.7)
"Eliminate existing and potential land use conflicts." (p.7)
"Encourage the development of complimentary land uses." (p.7)
"Encourage the development of commercial land uses where
accessibility is greatest and where impacts to residential uses
are minimized." (p.7)
"Provide for efficient and safe movement within the City." (p.7)
"Encourage the development of clustered neighborhood and
community commercial centers at arterial and collector
intersections." (p.39)
In addition to the broad Comprehensive Plan policies outlined
above, the parcel is designated in the Comprehensive Plan
Evaluation and Appraisal Report as an area of potential land use
conflict (Area 39). The language for Area 39 reads as follows:
The recommendation contained in the original draft
of this report that the west half of Area 39 be
changed to a High Density Residential land use
category and the R-3 zoning district has been deleted.
Therefore, the R-IAA zoning on this parcel should
-3-
continue and the land use should be shown as "Low
Density Residential."
The Planning Department's recommendation that the land use for
the west half of area 39 be changed to "High Density Residential"
was modified by the City commission during public hearings which
preceded the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and
Appraisal Report. The Future Land Use Plan designation was
instead amended from "Moderate Density Residential" to "Low
Density Residential" to reflect the desire of the residents in
the vicinity of this intersection to retain the existing low
density residential character that currently exists.
Issues/Discussion
1. Whether development of this property for commercial uses will
have an adverse impact on surrounding residential properties.
The property is of sufficient size and depth so that it could be
developed without causing significant adverse impacts on the
existing mUlti-family residences which lie to the south across
the canal. The types of uses that are allowed in the C-l zoning
district generally do not create nuisances such as litter, odors,
noise, or glare and usually do not operate after 6:00 p.m.
However, the use of this property for offices would change the
character of the neighborhood, considering that there is no
commercial zoning or commercial land uses established in the
vicinity. Furthermore, approval of this rezoning request would
set a precedent for the rezoning of the abutting parcel to the
east (Alhambra Square ACLF), the R-lAA (PUD) zoned parcel at the
northeast corner of the intersection (Alhambra Square North) and
the vacant 11.74 acre parcel within the Quail Lake Planned Unit
Development.
As a condition of site plan approval, if this request is
approved, it is recommended that the six foot high concrete block
wall be provided along the southern property boundary, and that
the parking lot lighting along this property line be directed
away from the existing residences. Although it is not
anticipated that this facility would experience significant use
during the evening hours, parking lot lighting is often activated
during the evening hours to enhance on-site security and to
assist the Police Department in patrolling the property.
2. Whether development of this property for commercial uses will
have a significant impact on roads in the vicinity.
As a result of the adoption of the new growth management
legislation, it is appropriate to review all rezonings and/or
Comprehensive Plan amendments on the basis of infrastructure
capacity. This is particularly important when attempting to
analyze whether or not the adopted Comprehensive Plan
Thoroughfare Plan Map provides enough capacity to meet the needs
of any request which will intensify the level of land
development, thus potentially creating more traffic than the
system was designed to carry. The applicant's traffic engineer,
K.S. Rogers, Inc., has submitted a traffic impact analysis which
analyzes the impact of the proposed developments (Alhambra Square
North, South and the ACLF) on roadways and intersections in the
surrounding area. In addition, Mr. Roger's impact statement was
reviewed by Walter H. Keller, Jr., Inc., the City's traffic
consultant, to determine consistency with adopted City and County
codes and ordinances. Both reports can be found in Exhibit "A"
of this memorandum.
As a basis for view of plan amendment and rezoning requests, the
City has adopted Level of Service (LOS) C as the base standard,
which provides for stable operating roadway conditions even
though backups may occur. LOS D is acceptable only during peak
season. No approval for development shall be adopted until it
-4-
can be demonstrated that the roadway system serving the proposed
development meets these criteria.
In addtion to the above, it is also appropriate to review plan
amendment and rezoning requests with the recently adopted Palm
Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance (Ordinance
No. 87-18) as Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes, Local
Government Comprehensive Planning Act, mandates that the City
coordinate its plan policies with those of the state, county,
region, and neighboring municipalities. These projects, if
approved, would place additional traffic on the state and county
road systems.
Mr. Keller's analysis of the report prepared by K.S. Rogers, Inc.
can be summarized as follows:
A. Trip Generation: Both daily and peak hour traffic volumes
meet or exceed calculated volumes.
B. Trip Distribution: Results were almost identical.
C. Proqrammed Improvements: There are three programmed roadway
improvements in the study area which all involve Congress Avenue.
These improvements should either be completed or under
construction at the time of project completion.
D. Traffic Assiqnment: The assignment is reasonable based on
the calculated trip generation and traffic distribution.
E. Background Traffic: The applicant's submittal does not
provide documentation on the background traffic analysis.
Supporting information should be submitted by the applicant to
document existing traffic counts collected, historical traffic
growth, and the generation and assignment of approved projects.
F. Future Traffic Impacts: The applicant's future traffic
impact analysis is reasonable, subject to the submission of the
background traffic documentation. No roadway improvements are
required except for those proposed for the project driveways.
G. Conformance with City and County Standards: The report is
consistent with both City and County requirements, subject to the
submission of the background traffic documentation.
Based on the above, the proposed development, if approved, will
not have a significant impact on roads in the vicinity.
3. Whether there is an adequate supply of office space and
existing commercially-zoned property in the vicinity.
There is currently about 230,000 square feet of office floor
space at the intersection of Congress Avenue and Woolbright Road.
On South Congress Avenue (west side) in front of the Hunters Run
Planned Unit Development, there are approximately 30 acres of
vacant C-3 zoned property. The above properties are located
within one-half mile of the subject parcel. Within approximately
one mile of the subject parcel, at the intersection of 1-95 and
Woolbright Road (southwest corner), is the Pylon Interstate Park
and the Boynton Commercenter Planned Industrial Development,
which include 308,000 square feet of office space which has
either been approved or constructed. Furthermore, there are
about 8 acres of C-2 zoned property and 9.4 acres of vacant C-3
zoned property at the northwest and southwest corners of
Interstate 95 and Woolbright Road. At the northwest corner of
Woolbright Road and the LWDD E-4 canal is the Chua Eye Clinic,
which has been approved for 14,400 square feet of medical office
space. This project was recently completed. At the southwest
corner of Woolbright Road and the LWDD E-4 canal is the
Woolbright Professional Center, which has been approved for
26,400 square feet of professional and medical floor space.
Based on the above, it can be concluded that there is already an
adequate supply of office floor space and commercially-zoned
property in the vicinity.
-5-
4. Whether the property in question is physically and
economically developable for single-family residences.
Under the existing R-1AA (PUD) zoning, the property could be
developed for about 20 single-family residences. If the rear of
the lots are designed to back up to Congress Avenue and Golf Road
and a berm and/or wall is provided along these thoroughfares,
then the property could conceivably be developed for
single-family detached housing. The recent construction of new
Leisureville homes near the subject parcel would tend to support
this conclusion. In addition, there is an existing subdivision
of high priced single-family homes at the southwest corner of
Congress Avenue and Golf Road (Silverlake Estates). Although the
lots along Golf Road in this subdivision are separated from the
intersection by an 80 foot wide canal right-of-way, the lots are
along Congress Avenue are separated from Congress Avenue with
only a wall. Given that this is sufficient buffering for homes
in the $150,000 plus price range, it is arguable that similar
buffering measures would be sufficient for R-1AA zoned lots
which, when developed, would probably be in the $80,000 price
range.
5.. Whether office/professional zoning would be consistent with
Comprehensive Plan policies for the location of and access to
commercial uses.
Commercial development of properties at this intersection would
be consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies for the location
of commercial uses. The Comprehensive Plan encourages commercial
development at arterial and collector intersections and
discourages strip commercial development. Development of the
SUbject property would not create strip commercial development.
Commercial zoning of the property would also be consistent, in
part, with the policy of encouraging "development of commercial
land uses where accessibility is greatest and where impacts to
residential uses are minimized. The question in this case is
whether it would be appropriate to change the character of the
properties in the vicinity from residential to commercial. Land
Use Conflict Area 38 of the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and
Appraisal Report recommends that commercial development should
not be permitted at this intersection, as it would change the
residential character of the neighborhood and could create
unacceptable levels of traffic.
Conclusions/Recommendations: Rezoning the subject property to
Office/Professional would not have a significant impact on roads
in the vicinity and would be consistent with Comprehensive Plan
policies with respect to location. However, rezoning would cause
a significant change in the character of the neighborhoodand may
have a negative impact on abutting residential uses. This
concern is reflected in the language for Land Use Conflict Area
38 of the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report.
Rezoning this corner would also set a precedent for commercial
zoning of the undeveloped parcels to the east, north and
northwest, which would further change the character of the
neighborhood. Whether the change in character is desirable is
the underlying issue in this rezoning request. It is the
Planning Department's conclusion that changing the character of
the neighborhood from residential to commercial is not desirable
and that the property is developable under the current
residential zoning. Therefore, it is the Planning Department's
recommendation that commercialization of this parcel not be
allowed, and that the application for amending the Future Land
Use Element to "Office commercial" and rezoning to C-l,
Office/Professional should be denied. If it is the decision of
the Planning and Zoning Board to recommend approval or the City
Commission to approve this request, it is recommended that the
following conditions be incorporated:
-6-
CONDITIONS OF ZONING APPROVAL
1. It is recommended that a six (6) foot high concrete block
wall be provided along the southern property boundary.
2. Lighting shall be directed away from the abutting residential
neighborhood.
3. Proper screening and noise mitigation is recommended for all
mechanical equipment.
4. The applicant's traffic engineer should submit information on
the background traffic as outlined in the traffic analysis
prepared by Walter H. Keller, Inc. This information should be
evaluated prior to second reading of ordinances to determine if
any levels of service have been adversely affected.
5. Final recommendations with respect to turn lane improvements
for the project driveway to be made by the Technical Review Board
at the time of site plan approval.
""
-~
,-'0--.-.- ~
CARMEN S. NZIATO
/bks
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: Mr. Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
DATE: December 8, 1988
FROM: Betty S. Boroni
City Clerk
RE: Planning & Zoning Board
Meeting of l2/l5/88
Attached please find a letter received from Carmen L.
Ford in opposition to the applications submitted by
Norman J. Michael and Milnor Corporation, scheduled
to be heard by the Planning & Zoning Board on December
l5.
B:::'7:~A;
BSB/smk
Attachment
cc: City Attorney
City Manager
Mayor & Commission
P&Z Board Members:
H. Blanchette
M. Huckle
M. Jackier
D. Richter
R. Walshak
J. Aguila
G. Lehnertz
RECEIVEJ
-:(' 9' 'l988
, 'J
Pl.l:"".".G DEPT.
-
-
~
,~
CARMEN L. FORD
1425 S. IV. 25TH AVENUE, liB
BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
City of Boynton Beach
City Commission
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
RE: Notice of Zoning Change
Notice of Land Use Change
This is to advise you that I object to the changing of:
Application No.1, from Moderate Density Residential to Office Commercial
Applicant: Milnor Corporation
Location: S. Congress Avenue at Golf Road, Northeast Corner
Project Name: Alhambra Square North
I further object to the changing of:
Application
Applicant:
Owner:
Location:
Project Name:
No.2, from low density Residential to C-1 (Office/Professional)
Norman J. Nichael
Norman & Elishka Michael
South Congress Avenue at Golf Road, Southeast Corner.
Alhambra Square South
I further object to the changing of:
Application
Applicant:
Owner:
Location:
Project Name:
No.3, from Low Density Residential to Pigh Density Residential
Norman J. Nichael
Norman and Elishka Michael
Golf Road at S.H. 13th Street, Southwest Corner
Alhambra Square ACLF
I am requesting all three (3) applications be denied. Any form of business in this
area will decrease the residential property value and the home type atmosphere we have
now.
Sincerely; "
If: ,..;.} .., - , (,
~l.<..i.1-~;..,J '-~ . ..)'r5/i'..{
Carmen L. Ford
Date
iJi' ! /-.-/ C7 '~ .
~-t-!it0?< 4-Itf ..., ~ i....-.;Ck'.'
I / '
7/:7 -:'I7.'Uv ,:2f. /'7 n
,
Notary
/ \)j \ Il.cOsj)"-.
/(<Y -----V,,,,,,\
. /T.C:''').t.~, ">'
"'(...".1:_ \-~....
" ';.'" \-'
DEr "'~U '-11\
Ci", '.?, 10 ,-
'r~~ ,
",' tc", . v88"',-
') "'''' 't~
... I (~, , ,',..::,,.. /......'"
-, ( ,.'1/ ,'-
"
'.. __ "\7'
1'1 1,,\ -
, ;'", -
Ny commission expires:
Notary Public. StJtc of FlorIda at Laroe
My Commi~,sion ExC';res December 18, 1988
BOl1dC'd Thru Brown & Orown. Inc.
,
---'
M E M 0 RAN DUM
October 20, 1988
TO: BETTY BORONI, CITY CLERK
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: ALHAMBRA SQUARE SOUTH /ACLF
Attached is a copy of the warranty deed for the above referenced
rezoning applications.
J:;- j~
JJG:ro
Attachment
MEMORANDUM
---------
October 20, 1988
TO:
Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
FROM:
Raymond A. Rea, City Attorney
RE:
Norman Michael Property
In regard to the above entitled matter herewith I enclose
copy of correspondence I received from Michael M. Listick,
together with a copy of a Warranty Deed, dated November l7, 1975
from First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Broward County
into Norman J. Michael and Elishka E. Michael.
~~QI-
City Attorney
RAR/r
M E M 0 RAN DUM
October 11, 1988
TO: BETTY BORONI, CITY CLERK
FROM: JAMES J. GOLDEN, SENIOR CITY PLANNER
RE: TRANSMITTAL OF LAND USE AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS
SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ON OCTOBER 1, 1988
Accompanying this memorandum you will find a copy of the
application and related documents for the following Land Use
Element Amendment/Rezoning applications:
1. Boynton Beach Mall Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning
($1,800 fee includes postage)
2. Alhambra Square North Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning
($700 fee)
3. Alhambra Square South Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning
($700 fee)
4. Alhambra Square ACLF Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning
($800 fee)
5. Winchester Tract #1 Annexation and Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning ($1,400 fee)
6. Winchester Tract #2 Annexation and Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning ($1,400 fee)
7. Winchester Tract #3 Annexation and Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning ($1,300 fee)
8. Jonathan's Grove Annexation and Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning ($900 fee)
The public hearing dates for the above requests have been
tentatively scheduled for December lS, 1988 and January 4, 1989
pending approval by the Planning and Zoning Board and City
Commission respectively. Legal advertisements (one-quarter page
map ads) will be prepared by the Planning Department and
forwarded to your office upon completion.
~t-~
JbMES J I GOLDEN
JJG:ro
cc Central File