APPLICATION
Land Use / Rezoning Application
Boynton Beach, Florida
Alhambra Square
PREPARED FOR: NORMAN J. MICHAEL
10460 PAESTWICK ROAD
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORDA 33436
PREPAReD &Y: CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
4722 N.W. 2ND AVENUE. C106
BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33431
~- '-.-
.
CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES
Planners and Land Development Consultants
~iti' f)I~lniljflg . /()rlill\~ ,.. PCl fllll~
.~. --.~.--.."
"
Boca Raton . (305) 994.6411
SL'ptember '1(I, ] 9HH
Mr. Carmen Annunziato
City of Boynton Beach
120 N.E. Second Avenue
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Subject: Land Use and Rezoning Petitions
Congress Avenue at Golf Road
Dear Cannen:
Herein transmitted are three application packages relating to proposed develop-
ment at the intersection of Congress Avenue and Golf Road. At the direction of
your staff, we have prepared three separate land use and zoning petitions, since
the components of this proposed project contain three separate parcels. It is,
however, the proposal of the applicant to develop all of this property in a co-
ordinated manner under a common master plan.
Obviously, it is too early in the process for us to represent that we have final
detailed plans for this area, since we will need to go through a formal site plan
review and obtain all of the City's comments on our planse We have, however, in-
cluded a number of concept plans to give you a clear understanding of the type
of development that we are proposing to have at this intersection. Basically,
our plans call for developing office uses on the northeast and southeast quad-
rants of the intersection with the remaining five acres of the property on the
south side of Golf Road being developed with an ACLF facility.
The applicant recognizes the concern that the City and surrounding residents have
concerning the development of this intersection. Also, we feel that both the City
and area residents recognize the difficulty in developing and marketing low
density residential units at a major intersection of the trafficways. We have
spent a considerable amount of time researching the feasible alternatives for
developing this corner and still deal with the area-wide concerns. We feel that
the request we are herein presenting to you reflects a variety of uses which are
all compatible with the area residential properties, and which will still be
viable, given the location of the site.
We will be looking forward to dealing regularly with you and your staff regard-
ing the processing of these petitions, and will be happy to answer any questions
or provide any information that you might require.
Please call if you have any questions or comments.
5a:t; ~
Charles Putman
CPlaps
Enclosures:
Milnor 4.01 acres application
Michael 5.00 acres application
Michael 4.368 acres - applciation
4722 N.W. Second Avenue' Suite 106 . Boca Raton, Florida 33431
I
,
.--'
. .
keMR_U~~_e~~M~~~~I_e~QLgB_B~Zg~l~a_afE~l'eIl~
.
..~
'~
City of Boyntpn Be.ch. FIQri~a
Planning .n~ Z~ning Board
.1
This application must b. fi~~.d out compl.telv and .ccur~tely and
subm1tt.d. tog.th.r with the ..at.rials H.st.d 1n Section II b.low. 1n two (2)
cop1.s to the Planning D.partment. Incompl.t. .pplicati~ns will not be
processed.
Pl~ase Print Legibly or Typ. all .Information.
1. ~&~&Beb_l~EQB~eIlg~
1. Project Name~ ___~~~~~~~~~B~~_~---~-_______~__-_-___-____
2. Type of Application (check one)
.
a.
R.zoning onlV
Land ~.. AMen~ment only
~n~ ~.. AMend~~ ~~ Re~~n~ng
b.
xx
c.
,
3. 'Dat. th~. .App!i.cat!an i. A..~ept~ (tp b. fi.H~ OI,It by Planning
Depart..nt) :
...~
...__.~"':.....~1!"".
4. AppUC-Ant.....,..... .(per. t;Ir' liIu~"n".. .ntl,t-v l,"whO.. name this
. appUcat1c:an .i. ."~U
Norman J. Michael
_.
. ~ ._.. , .
.
.~.. ~-.... ....
..
Addre.s:
Jl:D.46Q J!J:estIdJ:k' .'BDad
.......
__.. ."., "r
.
,!lo~ton Beach, Flor1d.!,)llaa~:. ~...;;'___~ __
. ......-..~..._..~.. '.'. ..-.....-. . ... ~~~~--~~-
Telephon.'
Number: . ~07~ 732-0~.40
...._- --.. ~~--~-~~~-~---------------
~. Agent's Name (p.r.on, ~f anv. r.pr.....nt~ng ~PQJl,c.nt):
~~~~~-~~~~~-4~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~-------~------
Address:
_'l.?.33J!:.H~~COl!.Unu.~ !.~-.ul6.l.._ __ _ .-----
._......_ _h'_U' h_ ~.._._______... .-_~._~ -_~,..__~~~--~- _..
..B.2.;!~~on..A~J"~Jl._" _-:".. _~ .~~~....~.~~~...~___~ ~....~
Planning D.p~. 4-B6 :P"liI. 1-
- ~~~ ~'~:_; ;~-..
Telephone _____~QLLJ~i~~l___________~____________________________
Number:
6. Property, 9wner's (or Tru~tee'sl Name:
.1
_~~~~WWW-~~lU~~~~lt~~~-~~~i~h~~!___________________
10~60Prestwi~~,R~d
-----------~--~~-----------------------------------
Address:
Rn"nrnn R~ft~h '''~-'-'. 33.1.~" " ________
______~~M~ ~~~~__~_____---------
Telephone ______i407)~~32.004~______________________________________
Number:
7. Correspondence Address (if differen~ than applicant or agentl:*
..P..O. Box, 3939, Boynton Beach, Florida 33424,..3939 ________
------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
,
* This is theaddre.. to which all agendas, letters, and other
. materials will be llIaned.
B.
What i. the applicant's interest in the subject parcel?
'(Owner, Buyer, L_see, Builder, Developer, Contr~ct Purch.ser, etc.)
Owner
..
'0'\
______--------___________'va ~__________
9.
Street Address or Location oi Subject Parcel:
of Congress Avenue and Golf Road
Southeast intersection
------------- ~---
~
...----------
-----
10.
LeQal.Description of ~ubJect Parcel: ____________________--------
~T. 4, Less the East 6l5.42~ ~~_ there~f ~!..L2!.<;.'!..!!!rbour 3rd. Sec,Upn
::':.:_ 0:. B~~_~Ch, Flor1.da~ ~~d}~~~..!~~~':.r.!.2!.~rded ~______
P.l~~~o: 30, p~ges~~19 and 120:!~!:.~!~':2!~~~L~a}~_~~~!;_S?2~2111ridiL
------------------------------------------------------------------
------~----------------------------------------------------------
11. Area o~ Subject Parcel
(to the near.st hundredth (1/100) of an ~cre):
4.368 Acres
------~---------------~-----------------------------------------
PI."ni"; Dept.4-S6
pa;. 2
..~:.:. "'/
12. Current ZonIng Dl.trlct~
R-1M
----------------------------------------
13. Propo..d loning Di~~rict:
C-1
---------------------------------------
14. Current Land U.e Category:
...---
1~. Proposed Land U.e Category:
~~_~:P~J~-~~i~~~1~~___________________
16. Intended U.e of Subject Parcel:
Oli1~~~l~~~_________________________
Medical/Office/Bank Complex
---------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
17. Developer or Builder:
----------------------------------------~--
-----------~---------------------------~-------------------------
18. Architect: 3~~~~~~~nl;l~~!~~g~st~_____________~__________________
19. Landscape Architect: ch!~~_r~~~~_l~~~~~l~_______________________
<
.
20. Site Planner: _~~!l~rPutman ~~~2~~~~~____________________--~-----
21. ClvllEngineer:
-- ... ------------------------------------
22. T,.afofic .EnQin"""~ K.Se Roge..r~.....LV___________________--------
23. SUrveyor:
--
~
O'Brien,. Suiter & O'Brien Inc.
-- -~----~---~---------------------------
II. ~A~BlBk2_IQ~~E,SU8MITTED~~t~ceIlg~
The following materi~ls shall be submitted, in two (2) copie., unl...
otherwise noted.
, '
(check)
_~__a. This application form (3 copies for PUDs, PCO., and PIPs).
. ,.
____b: A copy of the last recorded warranty deed (3 copies for PUDs, PCDa,
and PIDs) .*There is no, obtainable c'opy of this document. An Affidavit is being
submitted .in its place.
._~__C. Th. fOllowinQ documents and letters of con.ent (3 copies far PUD8,
~D., and PIDs):
____(1) If the property is under Joint or ..Veral ownershiP: A written
consent to the application by all owner. ~f record, and
____ (2)' If the appl icant i. a contract purCha"er: A copy of the
purcha.e contract and written con.ent of the owner and ..ller, and'
___(3), If the applicant is represented by an authorized "gent: A copy
Planning Dept. 4-80
page 3
'i;.,_>
.-,.....:
of the ~gency agreement, or writt~n consent of the applicant, and'
(4) If the applicant is a lessee: A copy of the lease ~greement,
and the writte~"consent of the owner, and
(~) If ~r. applicant is a corporation or othgr businesS entity:
name of the-officer or person responsible for the application,
wri~ten proof that said person has the dalogated authority to
represent the corporation or other busineG~ entity, or in lieu
thereof, written proof that he is 1n fact ~n officer of the
corporation.
Thl
and
____d. A sealed boundary survey of the subject parcel by a surveyor
registered in the State of Florida, dated not more than six (6) months'
prior to t~e date of submission of the application, at a scale prescribec
by the Planning Department, and containing the following information:
____(1). An accurate legal description of the subject parcel.
.
____(2) A computation of the total acreage of the subject parcel to the
nearest hundredth (1/100) of an acre.
____(3) A tree survey, which conforms to the requirements of the City of
Boynton Beach Tree Preservation Ordinance. This requirement may be
waived by the Planning Director where found to be unrelated to the
land use or zoning issues involved with the application.
____e. A complete certified list of all property owners, mailing addresses,
and legal description. for all properties within at least four hundred
(400) feet of the subject parcel as recorded in the latest official tax
rolls in the county court hOUSe shall be furniShed by the applicant.
Postage, and mailing Jabel. or addressed envelOPes must also be provided.
Said list shall be accompanied by an affidavit stating that to the best oi
the applicant"s knowledge .aid li.t is complete and accurate.
Notiofication of surrounding property owners will be done by the Ci ty of
Boynton Beach.
____f. A copy of the Palm B~ach County Property APP~.iser.s maps showing all
of the properties referred to in paragraph e. above, and their relation tc
the subject parcel. "
.'
____g. A statement by the applicant Justifying the :oning requosted,
including reasons why the property i. unsuitable for development under thE
eXisting zoning and more suitable for development under the proposed
zoning. "
. .
____h. . A comparison of the impacts that would b. c~eated by de~elopment under
the proposed zoning, with the impact. that would b. created by development
under the eXisting zoning, which shall include:
____(1) A comparison of the potential square fOOtage or numl.er .nd type oi
. dwelling units under the .leisting zoning with that whicl' would be
allowed under the proposed zoning or develOPment.
(2) A statement of the u.e. that would be allowed in thp proposed
Planning Oept. 4-86
page 4
, .
,
zoning or development, and' any particular Uses t~at wlluld be, e):cluded
(3) Proposed timing and phasing of the development.
(4) A.comparison of traffic which would be oenerated under the
proposed ~~ning or development, with the traffic that would be,
generated under the current zoning' also, an analysia of traffic
movements at the intersections of driveways that would s.rv. the
property and surrounding roadways, and improvem.nts that would be
necessary to accomodat. such traffic movements (iri! copi.s). For
proposed developments which would generate three-thousand (3,000)
vehicle trips per day or more, or two-hundred fifty (2~0) or more
single-directional vehicle trips within a one (1) hour period, a
traffic impact analysis shall b. required (in ! copi~.). Said traff1.
impact analysis shall include proje~ted trip generation for the
development, for all major roadways and intersection. within one and
one~half (1.~) miles of the subject parcel, as well as traffic that
would utll,ize local streets through residential zoning districts.
Said traf~ic impact analysis shall compare traffic l.vels between the
existing zoning and the proposed zonino or development of the subject
parcel, and shall take into consideration all development that would
be possible under the current zoning within the City. adjacent cities,
and within the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County within.a
radius of five (~) miles. For tho.e parcels lying in the.
unincorporated ar.a of Palm Beach County, which are not currently
zoned for urban land use., the potential land use. according to the
Palm Beach County comprehensive plan shall be used. Wh.r. said
parcels .re shown on the Palm S.ach County comprehensive plan under
residential land use cat.gorie., the midpOint of the.density range
shown on County comprehen.ive pl.n .hall be used. Where a countY-Wid.
study of-tr.ffic gener.tion at build-out ha. been .dopted or is
utilized by Palm Beach County, the levels of tr.ffic that are
projected by .aid .tudy sh.ll in all c.... b. used to proj.ct
background tr.ffic in the tr.ffic impact analy.i. .ubmitt.d bY the
appl icant. ' The for"fliat and .tandard. u..d in the traffic impact
analy.i. .hall b. the same a. those which are required by Palm Se.ch
..County, with the elCception of the requirement. li.ted above. Such
traffic impact analY5i. .hall include recommendations for the
mitigation of tr.ffic impact., con.ist.nt with the .tandard. which
have been adopted ~y o~ are utilized by Palm Beach County.
____(:5) . For: parcels larger than on. (1) acre, & compari.on of thlt water
'demand 40r dev.lopment und.r the propo.ed zoning or development with
water de.and under the exi.ting zoning.' Water demand shall b.
estimated u.ing the standard. adopted by the Palm Be.ch County Health
Department ~or ..timating .uch d.mand, unle.. di~f.r_nt standard. are
justified by a regist.red .ngine.r. CommitmQnt to the provision of
improvements to the water sy.tem shall al.o be inclUded, where
exi.ting facilitie. would b. inad.quat. to .erva dev.lopment under th.
proposed zoning.
(6) ror parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison of ..~age flows
that..would b. generated under the proposed zoning or develop",.nt with
that which would b. generated under the exi.ting zoning. Sewage flows
shall be ..timated u.ing the standard. adopt.d by the Palm eeach
Planning Dept. 4-B6
page :i
\,
.
County Health Department ~or e.timating uuch'~lows, unle.s di~~erent
standards are justified by a registerod engin.er. Commitment to the
provision of improvements to the sewag. collection system Shall also
be included, wher.. the eKisting facilities would be inadeguate to
serve.development under the proposed ~bning.
.'
....
____(7) For prope.ed residential developments larger than one (11 acre, a
comparison of the prcJected population under the proposed zoning or
development with the projected population under the existing zoning.
Population projections according to age groups for the proposed
development shaU ,b. reqUired, where more than -fifty (:;0) dwelUngs,
or ~O sleeping rooms in the ca.. of group housing, would be allowed
under ,the proposed zoning.' Applications for rezoning to commercial or
industrial zoning districts which exceed one (11 acre in area shall'
also provide projections for the number of employees.
(Sl ~t the request of the Planning D.pa~tment, Planning and Zoning
Board, ,or City CounCil, the applicant shall also submit propos.ls for
.
minimizing land use conflicts with surrounding properties. The
appl ic:ant shall .Provide a summary of the nui sances and hazards
associated with development under the proposed zoning, as well as
propos.ls for mitigation such nuisances and hazards. Such .ummary
sh.ll .1solnclude,where .pplic.ble, exclusion of particular ases,
limitations on hours of operation, proposed loc.tion of loading area.,
dumpsters, and mechanic:al equipment, scre.ning .of service areas and
mechanical equipment, ,location of driveways and service entrance, and
speclfic.tlons,.or site lighting. Nuisances an h.zards shall be
abattrd or'.i t:.~.tad'jo .s, tci conform to the perforlllancestandards
cont~ned'i~~~e;;e~~~~zoning~egulatlons .nd th. standards contained
1n ,tffit,CitY'.'FlO.i..cont,.ol or-clinance. Also, st.t.lllents concerning
th~,~.Jght.' ~1.n~.tt~,&nd bulk of structure.,. setbacks from
P"OPttr'tY 11"..,:and,....I.ir.. for scr..ning .nd buffering the proposed
deveJoP_nt',:JJh&1::'bli1P,.ovidllCl., At the reque.~ of the Planning and
Zaning '8oard"CII'" ,CltY"Counclh the 6Ppl1c.nt ah.n .lso st.te the type
of ..con.tructi'On,and .,.chitectural styles that will be employed in the
pr~aiic:ld~l~."t:. ' ,
, .
.' . :',.. .1.
,--':"'(9) Ail thit,,.equ..tf;lf.' the PI.nning Department, Pl.nning .nd Zoning
Board, or. City Council, the .ppllcant .hall .lso .ubmit the following
.
information: '.
,.._(a) . Offic:ial .oil con.ervation s.""ice cl.ssification by Boil
a.soci.tions and .11 .,.... subject to inundation and high ground
w.ter l.vels.
____<b) Exi.ting and propos.d grad. elevations.
(c) EKi.ting or proposed w.ter bodl.s~
(dl Form of ownership .nd form of organization to maintain common
spaces and recre.tional facl1itiea.
_~~ (e) ", -A .wri.tten comIllU;ment~o ,the provi si on of all necessary
facil.iti.s for ,.tor,_ drainage, water supply, sewage collection and
tr..tment, .olid,wast.'disposal, hazardous wast. disposal, fire
Planning Dept., 4-86
page 6
.,' ..
. ...~ '.' '
protection, ..a5ementli or ric;lht5-Of-way, roadwaYli, recroation ..nd parI:
areas, school sites, and other public improvements or dedications
as may be required.
."
____(10) For ,rezoning. to plAnned zoning district. (PUDs, PCDs, and PID5),
the specific requirements for submission of applications for re;oning tl
such dtstrict~hall .lso be satisfied. Copi.. of evidence for unified
cor.trol '~nd development of the property, .s well as condominium,
homeowners', and property owners' a.sociation documents shall bQ
submitted in three (3) copies for planned zoning district..
Furthermore, all materials required for a subdiviliion master plan (in ~
copies, including survey) IihAll Also be Iiubmitted. '
II I. aE:E:bl~aIlQ!LE!1;sS... Fees shall be pat d at the 'tf me that the appl1 cllti on i..
submitted, according to the fees which have been adopted by resolution. ~
fee schedule i$ attached to this application. All fees shall be paid by
CheCk, payable"to the City of 80ynton Beach.
IV. ~E;B!lElt;anQ~
(I) (We) understand that this application and all plan and papers
submitted herewith become a part of the permanent records of the
Planning and Zoning Board. (I) (We) hereby certify that the above
statements And any statement. or showings in any papers or plAne
submitted herewith are true to the be.t of (my) (our) knowledge and
belief. This application will not be accepted unless signed .cCO~din~
he instructions below.
SEP 30 1988
t 11 . If--
e of Owner Cs) or Trust.e,
A orized Principal' if prop.rty
i wned by a corporation o~ other
busine.s entity.
------
----~-------------
Date
J.
_~~CIL~~HI______
Signature of Authorized Agent
",'" (' ~ ("I". "; t~; i.': i
~~1 ~-". ~ u '.) J~~\J
--------------~---
DOlte
(1) (We) he~eby de.ignate the above signed person .. (my) (our) authorized
with regard to this,:appl1cation.
,
~' ..J ,,:"'-../..J
----
re of Owner(s) or Truste.,
horized Principal if property
i wned by a co~por.tion or other
business ~ntity.
------------------
DAte
Planni~g Dept. 4-86
p.ge 7
."----->~~-
JUS T I F 1 CAT 0 N
A L HAM BRA
S QUA R E
SOLI T H
N () R MAN
M I C H A E L
The property that is the subject of this petition is currently zoned in a IJow
Density Residential category, calling for single-family home construction.
This site is located at an intersection of Congress and Golf Road where traffic
volumes are currently in the range of 30,000 vehicles per day, projected to
increase significantly over the next several years. This aspect of the property's
location has a direct impact on the highest and best use of this site. On the
one hand, the intensity of activity which exists at this intersection in the form
of not only overall traffic volumes, but the stop and go movements associated
with the intersection, make it a very undesirable location for low density resi-
dential use. The site is not large enough to allow sufficient buffering to
occur at the intersection so that this impact can be mitigated. Thus, the only
option for an economically viable development under the current zoning would be
to construct single-family homes adjacent to the high intensity traffic-way
corridors. The developer firmly believes that in today's environment of rela-
tively high construction and land costs, he could not provide a high quality
residential product on this property that would be marketable at this location.
By the same token, as the intensity of development increases at this intersection,
the property becomes more desirable as a commercial site. Given that there is
already a controlled intersection at Congress and Golf, it is clear that this
property would easily lend itself to a successful commercial or office develop-
ment. It does not appear that there is any question as to the appropriateness
of this property for commercial use, given its location, in that the City's own
Comprehensive Plan has acknowledged that this intersection is well suited for
commercial use. No such designation, however, has ever been provided on this
property, since there has been considerable pressure from the surrounding resi-
dential areas to keep the current residential zoning.
In submitting the particular petition contained herein, the applicant is proposing
to rezone this property to a C-1 commercial use. This zoning would allow the
property to be developed with general office, financial and medical types of uses,
with very little activity of a commercial nature being allowed. Good planning
practice would acknowledge that office types of uses, particularly when limited
to two-story elevations, which would be the case under the C-I zoning district,
create a desirable buffer between residential development and other more intense
uses. Unlike many types of commercial operations, these uses are generally daytime
facilities whose operations cease at the end of the day. Thus, there is very little
encroachment into the ambiance of the residential communities in the evening hours.
Also, there is typically very little truck and delivery traffic associated with
office uses.
Given the above, it is the applicant's opinion that the proposed zoning is justified
at this location for the following reasons:
o The intersection of Golf Road and Congress Avenue is a viable location for the
proposed use, given the traffic volumes that currently exist and the existence
of the controlled intersection.
o As acknowledged by the City's Comprehensive Plan, there is need for additional
commercial development in the rapidly growing western area of the City. AI-
-2-
though there is some commercial land use and zoning already earmarked in this
area on the Cityts Master Plan, in 198h tll~re were ()nly 62 acres (It C-1 zoning
in the whole City of Hoynton Bei3ch and very little of this was located in the
western area. Based 011 the population levels proposed for ultimate build-out,
and given the limited number of intersectiu{} areas that arp currently undeveloped
in the area, it would seem cleat Lhat there is not only a demand for additional
conunercial services in the area. but that this is a very desirable location for
such uses.
o The proposed use of the site for general office, financial and medical facilities
would seem to be a use that would be an effective buffer for the surrounding
residential uses.
II.h(l) COMPARISON OF EXISTING ZONING AND PROPOSED ZONING
Rezoning from R-lAA
Rezoning to C-l
Under the current zoning, R-lAA, 5 units per acre can be built. Since
the site is approximately 4.36 acres, a total of 21 units could be
built on this site. However, the required roads and setbacks would
reduce the potential yield to about 17 units. Using the minimum lot
dimensions, the average building would be about 3,000 square feet,
with a potential of 51,000 square feet for the entire site.
Calculations: 3,080 x 2 =
3,080 x 2 = 6,160 x 17 units = 104,720 square feet
Under the proposed zoning, C-l, 40% maximum lot coveage could be
achieved. This would be equal to 69,696 gross square footage.
Calculations:
174,240 square feet x 40% = 69,696 square feet.
II.h(2) Allowable Uses - C-l Zoning
The site will be restricted to those uses allowable in the C-l zoning
district.
II.h(3) Phasing and Timing of Project
The project will in all probability be constructed as one entire
phase. Project starting date would be September 1989, and it would be
finalized around December 1990. Development and construction will
begin immediately after obtaining the necessary approvals.
II.h(5)(6) Water and Sewer Demands
Under the current zoning, R-lAA, it has been shown earlier that 17
units could be constructed. Under the current Palm Beach County
estimate, a three bedroom house will use some 450 gallons per day,
both for water and sewage. This would mean a total site demand of
7,650 gallons per day.
Under the
building
would be
equate to
proposed zoning
would be allowed.
.10 gallons/day
6,969 gallons/day
of C-l, a total of 69,696 square feet of
The County standards for commercial usage
per building square footage. This would
for the office development.
II.h(7) Population Projections
Under
with
equal
the current zoning, R-lAA, 17 single family units could be built
a project average of 2.67 persons per household. This would be
to 46 persons in the development.
Under the proposed development, C-l, the projected number of employees
for such a development would be 215 persons.
919MilnorBB
~-_."._-----_._~- -----~-~
Land Use / Rezoning Application
Boynton Beach, Florida
Alhambra Square
PREPARED FOR: NORMAN J. MICHAEL
10460 PAESTWICK ROAD
BOYI1TON BEACH, FLORDA 33436
PREPAReD 8Y: CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES. INC.
4722 N.W. 2ND AVENUE, C106
BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33431
. .
ba~Q_~2g-e~g~Q~g~l_e~QLQB_8g1Q~1~~_aEebl~aIlQ~
City of Boyntpn Beach, Florida
.........
-
Planning and Zoning Board
.,
This application must be filled out completely and accurately and
submitted, together with the materials listed in Section II below, in two (2)
copies to the Planning Department. Incomplete applications will not be
processed.
PI~ase Print Legibly or Type all .Information.
I. Eg~gBeb_!~EQB~aI!Q~
1. Project Name~
ALHAMBRA SQUARE NORTH
----------------------~-~--------------------------
2. Type of Application (check one)
a.
Rezc:lning only
b.
Land Use Amendment c:lnly
----~--
c.
Land Use Amendment and Rezoning
.'
3. Date this Application is Accepted cto be filled out by Planning
Department):
-~---~---~------------~~---~---------~~-----------------
4. Applicant"s Name (person pr business entity in whose name this
. applicatlc:ln .is made):
MILNOR CORPORATION
-----------~~---~~-~--------------------------------- ~.
Addresiii:
1467 S.W. 25th Place
------~--~-~---~----~----------------------------------
Boynton Beach, Florida 33424-3939
------~~-~~~~~-~-~--~----~------------------------------
Telephone
Number: ,
(407) 732-0040
--~~---------~~~--~~~~~-~~------------------------------
5. Agent's N.me Cpersc:ln, ~f any, representing applicant):
_~h2~i~_~~~n~~~~~~_~--------__~------------------
Addre&s: _~~2~~~~-~es~u~~~~~u~-i~~22L--~------___---________---____
_~0:~_~~~~~1~L~~-13~ll~-----------________________----___
Planning Dept. 4-86
page 1
,.__...._-_.~.-_.~-_.._"--_._------
Telephone __0QLt~2i~~ll~--_---_--_---~-___-_----_-------_-_---_---
Number:
6. Property Owner'& (or TrU$tee'&) Name:
.'..... Milnor Corporation
----~--------------------------------------------------
.,
Address:
1467 S.W. 25th Place
--------------------------------------------------------
______~~r~~E_~~~~~J12Lid~_1~~~=~3~____-------------------
Telephone __J~~V_ll~-~~iQ_______________________________________---
Number:
7. Correspondence Address (if differen~ than applicant or agcntl:*
__:__J~Q~~~~_~]2________________________________--------
_____y21~~oE_~~~hLJJ~~~1~~=~____________________~___
* This i& the address to which all agendas, letters, and other
materials will be mailed.
8. What is the applicant's interest in the &ubject parcel?
(Owner, Buyer, Le&see, Builder, Developer, Contract Purchaser, etc.)
"
------------------------------------------------------------------
9.
Street Address or Location of Subject Parcel:
Northeast
-------------------
~~~~E_~~~~~~~~~_aE~_~oJl_~~~___~_______________________-------------
10. Legal Description of Subject Parcel: _~~!!S~_~~~~~1JE_~~c~j~~~---
.Township 45 south, range 43 east, City of Boynton Beach, Florida, Palm Be~~h-~~unty,
-----------------------------------------------------------
------------------------~-----------------------------------------
more particularly described.as follows:
The east 460 feet of the ~est 510 feet of the north 330 feet of the south 420 fees
-----------------------------------------------------------------
of the N.W. 1/4 of section 32, township 45 south, range 43 east, City of B~nton
------------------------------------------------------------ -----
Beach, County of Palm Beach, Florida, containing 4.01 acres, more or less.
-------~----------------------------------------------------------
11. Area of Subject Parcel
(to the neare&t hundredth (1/100) of an acre):
4,01 acres
------~----------------------------------------------------------
Planning Dept. 4-86
page 2
12. Current Zoning District~
----------------------------------------
R-lAA
13.
Proposed Zoning Dis~rict:
C-l
-------l~-----------------------------
/1vPcizirfE: .
~~~~~_~~n~1~~~~~i~e~!~~1_________________
Office District
14.
Current Land Use Category:
"'---
Proposed Land Use Category:
-------------------------------------
15.
16. Intended Use of Subject Parcel: ~~~i;~~Lq!!!~~~~~l~~________-------
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
17. Developer or Builder:
----------------------------------------~--
-----------.------------------------------------------------------
18. Architect:
Shoup-McKinley Architects _
-------~----------------------------------------------
19. Landscape Architect:
Charles Putman & Associates
--------------------------------------------
20. Site Planner:
Charles Putman & Associates '
---------------------------------------------------
21.
Civil Engineer:
-------------------------------------------------
22.
Traffic Engineer:
K. S. Rogers
-----------------------------------------------
23. Surveyor: ________E:~rl!~~21t~~~_~~1~~~_________~___--------
II. ~aI&Bleb~_IQ~~&_~~~II&~~lI~ee~l~aIIQ~
The following materials shall be submitted, in two (2) copies, unless
otherwise noted.
(check)
~~__a. This application farm (3 copies for PUDs, peDs, and PIDs).
_~__b: A copy of the last recorded warranty deed (3 copies for PUDs, PCD.,
and PIDs).
._~__c. Th. fallowing documents and letters of cOnsent (3 copies for PUDs,
PCDs, and PIDs):
____(1) If the property is under Joint or sevqral ownership: A written
consent to the application by all owners Qf record, ~nd
____(2). If the applicant is a contract purcha~er: A copy of the
purchase contract and written consent of the owner and seller, and'
____(3)
If the applicant is represented by an authorized ~gent: A copy
Planning Dept. 4-8b
page 3
NORMAN J. & ELlSHKA E. MICHAEL
10460 Prestwick Road
Boynton Beach, Florida 33436
September 20, 1988
Mr. Charles Putman
Charles Putman & Associates, Inc.
4722 N.W. Second Avenue (C-l06)
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Dear Mr. Putman:
This letter will serve as your authority to represent both Elishka E. Michael
and Norman J. Michael, who are the owners of approximately five acres of vacant
land at the Southeast corner of Congress Avenue and Southwest Twentythird
Avenue (Golf Road) in the City of Boynton Beach, for any matters that may arise
at the Planning and Zoning Department or at City Council for the purpose of
modifying the land use and rezoning of our property.
If there is any further information needed by the City, please do not hesitate
to call our office.
Sincerely,
.,
c~' , I
.f, ",/..-14,'"/10l?i'
I
;, ."
'/ /'/
. L../{~o / vcC?
~
Elishka E. Michael
1'-..
C.
:Ii
~,'
--,_ CXJ
~~ >:~i:-:'..
" .;.:;1......
u.. ~,-'
:.:. ' "';.'t'
.
S:i.:
.....:-
,.-
~-
<:'"
to.., ~
- >
I~J':'I :::.
e
1".,'
I"'.
-f'
:-
~,
1 '299(;
ThiS Warranty Deed ,
"1''-'.''':''
'.
j,,\.
'..,\R..'l Ctl
R..'
.,S<':'\I 1\' ll)',
H~
".
I'J.l.'r<.1a i"
fJl(,.n ..< H,
;.1 "f iJ.,
\.'T',-rl,"",",-,
....". ,! ii" ....01".
'IDR.~V..'IO J. "fIClIAEL and ELISHKA ;. '1ICHAEL, his 1.o'1:t'
..!..I,_ "~I 1310 S.... 2ith Ptacoi'. D"vnt"n B",arh. '.l<'rid.l
, '.,,, ,fl.'
II.. .",,,/.
.'" ,., ..~~:
_.'
....,--..,,,....
UlilRrssrlh:
10.00
ft."loll,...
I.., "".1 '" .""."'.....,,,,,, "I rI..
i,..".;,\ ".l,,,,,,,-j.,j,,..,j I"~
",..""..
."", "I.
/,., ""
.j".. ,,'tH"
, "
,,,,rq~..,, ~..t(
l"f.."I,I...,,,,.,./,.,../,,.,,
"""/" ".j".".,1 ,.
II,,'" ,......'",.
fll..." .,......," '.'l..th'
''',d '"'.1''''' ,,,.I.. /i,. <1",,,1.. .,f! d",: .,.,t.!'" !,...,,! ",.,,,,.. ,"
. .It" ~ '. I J ", "" " .
~
Lot 16, Block 16. GOLF VI~M ~\RBOGR 2~~ SECTiO~. accordinR to
the ~lat thereof. as recorded in Plat Book 27, Pages ~h and 47.
and Tracts 2. 3. and 4. GOLF VIEW HARBOUR JRD SECTIO~. ~ccording
to the Plat thereof. as recorded 1n Plat Book 30. Pages 119 and
120, Public Ro~~rds of Palm Beach County. Florida.
;;
Subject to conditions. restrictions. limitations. and easements of record
and taxes for the year 1915 and all subsequent years thereto.
Togtlhrr ",1...11 .1... .................. '".,..../itan...nl~ .."./ .., '...rr............. 11.<<..(.. '..,.IcH\9lnq Of ,n Qny
u...... CIPP""'...nin.,
To lUut and 10 ltold. .1..' ...~.' in ,,,. ..~,.I.. .,.......
Rod ,I.. .,.....,n' 1...".1.... "'N..._nh ,,'i,1. "a..l I'lt....""... ,Iud it .. '-...I..lIy ....:f'Ol .1 uai.1 I.utJ in If"f'"
.,...",.. ".Q. ,I Jail' 11._1 ,i..I.1 .....Ila...'u/ a..tl.,....h. t.. _Ii a...1 ........,. _..Il....~l. .".r it I.rr.-J.,y lully 11"0'
,...h ,;.... 1I1l.. ... on"I 'a...1 all" will .1..I..n.I,I... _..... _u.~1 .1... 'au.lul ...,...~ ..I.II,-non.t ,,''-''-,...r;
..".' I~a' .....J 1.....1 ,. .,.... ..I .11 ~'.I....J......,...... ..
.t'UIlft)&'lTl: !tlAl
-. f''"\~ .... , -';'
. . \..-....... , ... -
~~:. FL'OR~Oi, \ ~UR I;'
,. B.., '- ':1 0 e 00
.' . '.. . .: .." II
::..'" - .......
In tililluss 1tlhmef .1.. ....._ ".. .......,I u.... _b 10
I". .'U.. td.../ j't jt~ _"'" .nJ ill! ..-,-.... _,.. .....~~I~.,. ib
,'!.;....... 0"..... 11.......llnh...II(V .1111.-*-:.otI...... d.r~ ~Ji.;"t~~~~
""'/ /' WlST FED~~~.i4lI'li
l C/....:./J ASSOCtATl~~.t~~~~~~.:;
Asst- .......... ... ~~,"'.-.o: e ..~ 10.'~-).:-;
__I:. '0. ,,-....!,.. :4 ~
'" ,1... ,....~,.,,,.. lor e .... i ' eo 6 ;0 ,~;.
; ...:. :~ _. 0 : ~;e
--.- --r_'i: . . -/ i::.p
... oI"-'rl!-;:
}lye . ;i-'~". F _
, '"J, .....e6....~,)..~ .
1,\\, ~lJ '1~'U\\.c_:__.
",\. .:.~~. -
-\T1lqA~ :.,.7 /.
Dorothy P. A?
SO".....I .......1...1.....1.1..1.........,
--!<=(/. ~.
I' _.
John
~! ...1.
...!,.
;.c L
'I It .., FLORiDA
I . ,I ...], . I' BROWARD
lll..~.. . 1 ~ III' ,_..._ .... .., ,,_... .._,. _'~. .",., ,.. ..... ...... ._1 f_.... ""'.__' ... .... ~'''.'''''.'e_~'.
JOH."l E. ~"YE and DOROTHY P. ASH
Vice
'. .',. Asst I,....
.-\sst Secretary
_..... ....1. ..1 .h.o ._......._ .....-.1 .' e'u',~
....1
_'...'.'." ....",................ .. ,~.. ,..._.....01 ,~.. _'_..l..~. _..__. 10..10..... J~h...,I.
....".'..... ...' .~., ,~, .,..' .11....' '''''''.. .. .1.. .._ ....~...,. ...~ .01 ....4 ................
...1I..t,.
.... ',.
...., "'" I.., .,.~...... ,I.. 17 tn ..... ." ~ovember
01'1..75.
Official Seal
~l; ,[' P Carrier
. ......1'.. rubl;...
d t i. r;~:; <:1\ large
!.'iI' :,.;.t~l~f.r..r:.s ;w::paro.,j by
D^Nlt:i. L ADAl'.lS
J__.
..... II . ,
.-
..? .....
_a.
--
.
'i~~ti,2479 FAlE1737
L:-'O '-?-.T~,
~OTARY PUBLIC
\.1,lr,>
~y commission expires:
(SEAL)
'I'!TA"Y Pl'f!' Ir. sun~' rHHI'[1A all~~Cf
t" {1I "':~..;:.,'; l~; ,I. =~ 1915
l,. c.;~.l '" k,'''-....6~' 1>" - ,"...#r.......t c....
^:--rc.?~.' .
,.,:.
SOl I:. La!I Oi;.:~ n;n! SuJl(' :}CO
- - }'art 1..0000d('nlale. Florida 33301
0-
()1"
Ji;.
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS
for ALHAMBRA SOUARE
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned
owner(s) of all the property ~cribed in the attached Exhibit
"A" (the "Lands") on this ---lJ:L- day of December, 1988, for
themselves, successors and assigns, hereby declare that the Lands
described herein are and shall be held, transferred, sold,
conveyed, and occupied subject to the covenants, restrictions,
and easements hereinafter set forth.
ARTICLE I
RECITALS
Section 1. The undersigned owner(s) has applied to
the City of Boynton Beach, Florida for an amendment to the future
land use element of the city's Comprehensive Plan and/or rezoning
of the Lands as follows:
Future Land Use
Element
Alhambra Square North:
moderate density
residential to
office commer-
cial
Alhambra Square South:
low density
residential to
office commercial
Alhambra Square ACLF
low density
residential to
mUlti-family
residential
Rezoninq
R-lAA (PUD)
to C-1 (office
professional)
R-1AA (single
family residen-
tial) to C-I
(office profes-
sional)
R-1AA (single
family residen-
tial) to R-3
(mul ti-family
residential)
Section 2. In connection with said application, the
undersigned desires to voluntarily impose certain restrictions,
limitations and/or easements upon the use of the Lands.
Section 3. It is the express intent of the
undersigned to perpetually restrict (except to the extent
permitted pursuant to the provisions of Article VIII hereinafter
set forth) the use of the Lands for the benefit of the city and
persons of record owning real property located within four
hundred (400) feet of the Lands (the "Property Owners"), and for
no other persons, in accordance with the restrictions and
limitations set forth herein.
ARTICLE II
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The Lands which are and shall be held, transferred,
sold, conveyed and occupied subject to this Declaration are
located in Palm Beach County, Florida, and within the city limits
of the City of Boynton Beach and are described in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
LAW OF"F'"lCES ROBERT A. EISEN. P.A. . 4700 NORTHWEST 2"" AVENUE, SUITE 101, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33431
BOCA RATON (407) 9SiJ4-2090 . WEST PALM BEACH (407) 738-0388. BROWARO (305) 760-9086
ARTICLE III
INTENSITY LIMITATION/AESTHETIC CONSIDERATION
A. No structure or structures to be built on the Lands
shall exceed (in the case of Building set back be less than) the
following requirements:
1. Alhambra Square North:
Height:
Building Set,Back
Building Set Back
2 stories
from east property line: 100'
from north property line: 100'
2. Alhambra Square South:
Height: 2 stories
Building Set Back from South property line: 100'
3. Alhambra Square - ACLF
Height:
ACLF Units/Beds:
Multi family Units:
2 stories
124
as allowed by City zoning
B. The following development limitation shall apply to
all Lands:
(1) No dumpster shall be permitted in yards directly
abutting single family residential districts;
(2) All property lines between
single-family districts shall be improved with
boundary landscaping at least 6' in height;
(3) All lighting in parking areas shall be designed
and installed with shadow boxes or smiliar fixtures to reduce
direct illumination to single family districts. All lighting in
parking areas shall be extinguished at 12:00 midnight.
the Lands and
boundary walls or
(4) All utilities shall be installed underground;
(5) The canal bank to the south of
South and Alhambra Square-ACLF shall be
maintained.
Alhambra Square
landscaped and
ARTICLE IV
RESTRICTION DEEMED COVENANTS
These Covenants and Restrictions shall be deemed
covenants running with the Lands for the benefit of all owners of
real property abutting the land, and owners of real property in
the neighborhood and the City of Boynton Beach. These Covenants
and Restrictions shall be binding upon the undersigned Owners and
its successors and assigns.
ARTICLE V
USES PERMITTED/PROHIBITED, LIMITATIONS ON USE
The permitted uses for the Lands shall be limited to
the following:
A.
Medical and
offices.
Alhambra Square North: Business, Professional,
governmental offices, including banks and financial
B. Alhambra Square South: Business,
Medical and governmental offices, including banks
offices and drive in tellers.
Professional,
and financial
LAW OFFICES ROBERT A. EISEN, P.A. . 4700 NORTHWEST 2NC AVENUE, SUITE 101, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33431
BOCA RATON (407) 994-2090. WEST PALM BEACH (407) 738-0388 . BROWARD (30.5) 760-908a
C. Alhambra square ACLF:
Adult congregate living
facility and mUlti-family
residential
ARTICLE VI
SUBORDINATION TO DECLARATION BY MORTGAGEE(S), ETC.
All mortgages, deeds of trust, and other similar
encumbrances now or hereafter placed upon the property shall be
subordinate and inferior to this Declaration and its provisions,
and any firm, person or corporation owing or taking any interest
in the property by reason of foreclosure, deed in lieu of
foreclosure, or otherwise as a result of any such mortgage(s),
deed(s) of trust, or other similar encumbrancers) shall take
title subject to the provisions of this Declaration.
ARTICLE VII
TERM-AMENDMENTS
These Covenants and Restrictions shall be deemed
covenants running with the lands, for the benefit of the city and
all Property Owners, and shall be in perpetuity; EXCEPT THAT they
may be amended, changed, modified, in whole or in part, cancelled
or terminated (collectively "Amendment") at any time as to all or
any portion of the Property by appropriate written instrument
recorded among the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida,
which instrument shall be executed by the then owner(s) of the
Lands so encumbered by these Covenants and Restrictions and
consented to therein in writing by the city only after the
following:
1. Thirty days written notice in advance of the
Amendment is given by the city to the Property Owners.
2. The City adopts the Amendment at a public
hearing by a majority of the City Commission.
A recorded statement by the City Manager of the City to the
effect that all property Owners have been duly notified and the
appropriate vote of the city Council has occurred shall be
dispositive as to those requirements. The consent of the
Property Owners shall not be required with respect to any
Amendment. Provided, however, no Amendment shall be effect'ive
unless all mortgagees of record consent thereto.
ARTICLE VIII
BINDING EFFECT
binding
hereto,
personal
This Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants shall be
upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties
their heirs, successors, assigns, administrators and
representatives.
ARTICLE IX
SIGNATURE COUNTERPARTS
This Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions shall be
executed by Signature Counterparts. This Declaration of
Covenants and Restrictions and Signature Counterparts shall
consititute a single instrument.
LAW O~~ICES ROBERT A. EISEN, ~.A. . 4700 NORTHWEST 2"10 AVENUE, SUITE 101, BOCA RATON, F"LQRIDA 33431
BOCA RATON (407) 994-2090. WEST PALM BEACH (407) 738-0388 . BROWARO (30S) 760-90a8
WITNESSES:
OWNERS:
ALHAMBRA SQUARE NORTH
MILNOR CORPORATION, a
Florida Corporation
B~D.ll.o
No J. Michael,
President
ALHAMBRA SQUARE SOUTH and
ALHAMBRA SQUARE ACLF
---.....
. '---.,
~~
~~b~
B4~g~Q
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an
officer duly authorized in the State and County afores~id, to
take acknowledgements, personally appeared -. ~\ ~
and ~ Li I.::.. ". \ , well known
to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the
foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that they
executed the same in the presence of two subscribing witnesses
freely and voluntarily.
WITNESS my hand an~ official :\\:i i~e County and
State last aforesaid, this I.> day of Qc.- , 19.!'5S....
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
LAW OF"F'ICES ROBERT A. EISEN, P,A. . 4700 NORTHWEST 2ND AVENUE, SUITE 101, BOCA RATON, F'LORtDA 33431
BOCA RATON (407) 994-2090. WEST PALM BEACH (407) 736-0386. BROWARD (305) 760-90e6
EXHIBIT "A"
AllHAMBRA SOUARE NORTH
A parcel of land in section 32, Township 45
City of Boynton Beach, Florida, Palm
particularly described as follows:
South, Range 43 East,
Beach County, more
The East 460 feet of the West 510 feet of the North 380 feet of
the South 420 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of section 32, Township
45 South, Range 43 East, City of Boynton Beach, County of Palm
Beach, Florida, less and except lands described in Official
Records Book 5402, Page 670.
ALHAMBRA SOUARE SOUTH
The West 500 feet of the following described property:
Lot 16, Block 16, GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 2ND SECTION, according to the
Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 27, Pages 46 and 47, and
Tracts 2, 3, and 4 GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 3RD SECTION, according to
the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 30, Page 119 and 120,
Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida.
ALHAMBRA SOUARE ACLF
The East 590 feet of the following described property:
Lot 16, Block 16, GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 2ND SECTION, according to the
Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 27, Pages 46 and 47, and
Tracts 2, 3, and 4 GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 3RD SECTION, according to
the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 30, Page 119 and 120,
Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida.
(a:alhambra.doc (amp-doc mise)
LAW OFFICES ROBERT A. EISEN, I='.A. . 4700 NORTHWEST 2",0 AVENUE, SUITE 101, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33431
BOCA RATON (407) 994-2090. WEST PALM BEACH (407) 738.036e . BROWARD (305) 760-9088'
A F F I D A V I T
. .
STATE OF FLORIDA
ss.
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
BEFORE ME THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED
CHARLES PUTMAN
, WHO BEING DULY SWORN,
DEPOSES AND SAYS:
That the accompanying Property Owners List is, to
the best of his knowledge, a complete and accurate
list of all property owners, mailing addresses and
legal descriptions as recorded in the latest offi-
cial tax roles in the County Courthouse for all
property within Four Hundred (400) feet of the
below described parcel of land.
The property in question is legally described as follows:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
rract 4, Golfview Harbour Third Section, Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County,
Florida, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 30 at Pages
119 and 120 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.
~tUf'L; ?/~_
( J.gnature)
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
28th
day of
September A.D. ;19 88
~~~~
No:tary Public ~
State of Florida at Large
My Commission Expires: November 30 , 1991
.~{ I
'~~
:~:
'.\
'"
U.., <-Nor"
_.
LAW OFFICES
LISTICK Be STEINER. P.A.
ele E, ATLANTIC AVENUE
DELRAY BEACH. FLORIOA 33483
'.&071 27e;.7424
MICMAEL M. LISTICK
MARK L. KRALL
428-0143 IBfIIOWA"D)
8111.7137 (PAl.M IIACH)
278.'1108 tT&l.I:COa-IU)
October 19, 1988
1:) '\,'~ ..
~.. ,.... , ~'li''''-
...."",.:.~ \.."..tI 'V"' ;"")
'I t J ' .
""-'........
. OCT 20 1988
CITY IlTT
O,'tNEY
OP COUNSI:l.
MU;NAIU. I. ITIIINII"
-
~
Raymond A. Rea, Esquire
City of Boynton Beach
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
RE: GOLF VIEW HARBOUR ESTATES
Dear Mr. Rea:
Enclosed herewith is a copy of the Warranty Deed you
requested.
Should you need any additonal information please feel
free to contact this office.
~uz:,
Michael M. Listick
!1HL:bb
Encl.
.y -: .N
"
. ~~
.mi:
~:;?;.
~ff" ~
, ~7'
'.~' "
""
l~
C:
:Ii
~"
....._ <Xl
~w ~/~~.
.~ ~;.,
" . -'i.'f'
...... .~..~..
..~-
<:" -
L:J,:. ~
-'
::~.~
,-.....- .
;SLi
. , (.
[I
\' \J'.:
(',
.r'
;,
.11299(;
This Warranly Deed "
"
'.,H"I'::H" r
,.,
ri,S'r:
",,';: 'I" ~
h::l' 1',.,'.\1C1 l~L)'. ';;1
,\',.. 1.,)",', ASSlli t., ~ in:; .).
nltt'd ~:_lt,.~ ,,~
Jorl,1,)
.j~' R.'
/.,,'
~ ' "",' . ,I
,\.'l'l.ri......"
',,,
,.',,( II,
L..luJ,'rda ii'.
,) r ~
,,,' I!:. i II.. .,,,,,,,,,' ,,,
'iOR.'to\" J. ~ICHAEL and ELlSHKA i:. "t1CHAI::L. his ,.,i: l
(.",,,1/,,. ,,/",, ,. 1310 S,''';. ~lth Plar:<~. Be'ynt(,n e.~a('h.
l..rW.,
-.
,II., ."t:. ill.. .",,,,,.
"'. ."
".. l'~"'"
..',....,,, ,n,'
".'''L'''''' ..-,!
.,..)..,.".....
,f.
Willltssdh: Ii
,;,. 11..,,11..' I." "..,f ,,, ",,,..,1..,..1...,, "I ,I.. ...n, ,,' ~ 10.00
oml olh,.,
=>
, "f..,,',I.. . ",,,"/,,,,,/,,,,, '.. ,-",/ "./"......1 '0 1".".1.\ II. l.'",u..i, !i"..,1 t., ,i..... p"......,. ,10... ~"n',l ;'11")11111. .~,.li,
III ,.." r. , . "Io'n . '" .. ",: . "..1., II. "" I" I J". """.r.. ., /! I J." t ...., ~.,," I" '11 I . : ,,'" '.. ",
(......t. 11....</" . ,:
~
...
Lot Lb. Block 16. GOLF VI[~ a~R80UR 2~~ SECTI0~. accordin~ to
the Plat thereof. as recorded in Plat Soak 21, Pages 46 and 41,
and Tracts 2, J, and 4, GOLF VIEW HARBOUR JRD SECTIOS, 3ccording
to the Pl~t thereof I as recorded 1n Plat Sook 30. Pages 119 and
120, Public R.~~rds of Palm Beach County, Florida.
Subject to conditions, restrictions, limitations. and easements of record
and taxes for the year 1975 and all subsequent years thereto.
T ogtlhcr
U'I.'f' CPpM'lc,ni"!J
To Hapt and to
.",,1
"I,UH'"''''''''.'''
,I......,.. ,...I..n~."q or ,n onl'
J...,...liiclnl,'nh
..,.1.
,,/I ,/". "'''''",''n/'
Hold,
,I". ...."'.. i.. f.... .,m,.I.. !'>f''''''~
Rn.d .1... ",....1,,' 1......1." ......f'_,,,. ...t,II ...J .,_n'.... ,I.", it t. ,....1..111' ,...:,.., ..I I."," J.u.J in I,...
......,.1.. ,'.... If "... .,.....1 ,i.,I.. ..t.1 .....'111 ...,I._i'l' ,.. ....11 ....1 ...a'...." _i.ll..n.'. ,'''., it "'""',.~ lull;t 11'0'
...,... ,:... IiII.. ,.. e....1 I.....' ...., ,,'ill .1,1..n.' ,1., ....,.. _"'" tI... I.wlul ,.1.;"" "' oil ,.,.,...,ru u.J.o..uOo"'f";
.....J 11..., ~tul fn..-I t. I,.... ..( .11 "'"'...m'.'"",...... ..
,"
.' -"'l.- ""'. n'1....:.'..;.
~'! ::.~~.-, '.' 'S"U'R' .
'1.-:;;; fLORIO,\ \., I I,.
:"8" .., " '., 30" 00
'.' '.. -! \... II ...
.' ::.1'" . . --
In llIitntss lOhtrtof I~. ....._ I.... ~...-.I JJ.... _" I.
I... "\0"""'" ill il' h..........J ii, '--poN'" ""I.I,.~A~f'I~'" ii,
. ,,!;.,.., ..II" ..,. ,1""'''11"''' rI..h. ..d""":...I. ,J.,.. ,1.ril\'4 ~Cii1l~)~
J / -:... 'f: FIRST FED~~~~.t4l!lli..
\T"...rI\1..IC.T-;; I LA....;/J ASSOCL\Tl~l!l~~~~~'~,
Dorothy P. A Asst- s......e.. ~,.~.~..-4t'-.t:.....,~.IO."""'~.
. . "":"':0.'-"':"" :"i:.~
~,t'I"...1 w-nl...' .m.1 .I,./u...,,',' '" 11U' ,,,.....'u.. ..I '. a~... j _: 10 : -.: ,.:;'
. _ C). "C,..
~ _.... "'ae~~.,..
't",{:(r.~. ,/"';.... -.... ~
John . Nye ......,~~'ti ~.' ~. ~'...
, ':;1'''' .........,\..~ ~
""" r.:/J'lsu\\'-':l
\\\, .... ,.: ."~- '.
.roa"la.l[ U.4l
':"1
. .
.1_".1.
. ".
/..\.. \.:
'-
~ I " It... FLORlDt\
I ,., .... I \ . II BROlJ..\RD
"1.'"\ ,'"111\
,#,........ ......,......M,.............l
.".... ,..... ._1 c:_... ............I.~ ..... ........Io>.I._~..
',.
,......
.......,
JOll~ r. ~"YE
and DOROTHY P. ASH
Vice
'. "" Asst II'"
Asst Secretary
.....
....,...,...I>..I,......,..e'_...._oIe.e....'...
'.... "" ....... .......t..I... ......',... .... .._ " .... 1'......... ." ,... _I_..l~... .....__. 10..1. ..... ...1....,...10
"'II'.'"
.. ........".. ...' ...., ...... ....t .'1....1 '........ .. .... I.... ....,...e1o ...el .~ .... ............._
..' .... .~ .t.. '.....,.. ..... ....." t", .I.~....., ,10,. 17 t h ,.....1 ~ovember , I' 1..15.
'..
/.'/1'
Official Seal
.'.; :Ii.(, P Carrier
. ...;..IV l'L!bl:c
.." .,1 H~:r;::l.:l ~1 Lilrge
:.'''''rJ,J"i,.I~U..,~.. tlr,:paro.:! by
DANIt:L L ADAl'.lS
NOTARY PUBLIC
.
'i;~;j,2479 fm1737
,,'".!"7,...= /t:....T...:.. ~
-'
,. 1--'
....... '- . .
.-
,.1_ .....
_L
--
'.
\.!.Jr,.
~y co~iss1on expires:
(SEAl.)
~~r:'ARY PLIA! Ir.. saH,., rlOI/'I'\\ ,'lucr
l,~' llJ.,'..:~~\;...; \.1.; !/.:: . .': :&. 191~
I.;. ".':.,,1 .... ";l.~,....n b.....;, "...r"n.;~ (;or)
1071'C.,'1.1..:
,,'j.',.'.
301 t.. Lw Oil,;'; B:n! SuJl<, 300
__Fon Lauderdale. ficrlda 33301
0,
(), ;'
~
.,"".......:i.-.~..
-.
~~~QE~liQ~~
October 20, 1988
TO:
Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
FROM:
Raymond A. Rea, City Attorney
RE:
Norman Michael Property
In regard to the above entitled matter herewith I enclose
copy of correspondence I received from Michael M. Listick,
together with a copy of a Warranty Deed, dated November 17, 1975
from First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Broward County
into Norman J. Michael and Elishka E. Michael.
g~QI-
City Attorney
RAR/r
"
~
~'
.,./:
'1;'
.~.
i.,..N~.
\~I. .
" ........'1. ~,'
..~:: :: f
" ,
'~?'
i?#
\
','
CERTIFICATION AND AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF PALM B~CH )
BEFORE ME. the undersigned authority, personally appeared
MICHAEL M. LISTICK, ESQ. ("Affiant"), who being duly sworn under
oath, does hereby depose and say as follows:
1. Affiant is an attorney-at-law, with offices at 616 East
Atlantic Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida 33483.
2. Affiant has examined the public
Tract 4, Section 3 of GOLF VIEW HARBOUR
Page 119, of the Public Records of Palm
less the curve area of S.W. 13th Street.
records with regard to
ESTATES, Plat Book 30,
Beach county, Florida,
3. Affiant hereby certifies that
title to said real estate was in Norman
E. Michael, his wife.
as of July 12, 1988,
J. Michael and Elishka
4. This Certification and Affidavit is being given for the
benefit of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, regarding the
re~u7st for zoning, site plan and/or building approvals. This
op1n1on may be relied upon by the City of Boynton Beach,
Florida, but shall not be for the benefit of any other person or
entity without the written consent of Affiant.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.
~4rt.,tFi?
LISTICK & STEINER, P.A.
Attorneys-at-Law
616 East Atlantic Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 334Sj
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before
me, a Notary Public in the
COlnty and Sta afores id, this
day of , 1988.
My comm~ssion expires:
.'/..... \f--::; :: ~I ;"""
.'~ .~ .' ...... .'j ~ -'..
.' ....<::> ,...... ~"',"" .~
.. .,. v Y. ..
i........ C 0 .,-.1);''1.
_~!'"';; 1" . I -{ .: U!
-: _')' 0 . 1. : .:
~ 'c,:" r.jjOT.~t~ lIt:!"'T; OF FtORIOA
" "? .... -::: C.p lOti ExP.' 'PRo 3 1991
......,.. ......)' ...~NOfO . (OEa~ttAl liS. u.o
'. {. ....... '\" .
.', . .,: ~:: ~
,
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS
for ALHAMBRA SOUARE
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned
owner(s) of all the property ~cribed in the attached Exhibit
"A" (the "Lands") on this --lJ:l- day of December, 1988, for
themselves, successors and assigns, hereby declare that the Lands
described herein are and shall be held, transferred, sold,
conveyed, and occupied subject to the covenants, restrictions,
and easements hereinafter set forth.
ARTICLE I
RECITALS
section 1. The undersigned owner(s) has applied to
the city of Boynton Beach, Florida for an amendment to the future
land use element of the city's Comprehensive Plan and/or rezoning
of the Lands as follows:
Future Land Use
Element
Alhambra Sauare North:
moderate density
residential to
office commer-
cial
Alhambra Sauare South:
low density
residential to
office commercial
Alhambra Sauare ACLF
low density
residential to
mUlti-family
residential
Rezonina
R-lAA (PUD)
to C-l (office
professional)
R-lAA (single
family residen-
tial) to C-1
(office profes-
sional)
R-lAA (single
family residen-
tial) to R-3
(multi-family
residential)
section 2. In connection with said application, the
undersigned desires to voluntarily impose certain restrictions,
limitations and/or easements upon the use of the Lands.
section 3. It is the express intent of the
undersigned to perpetually restrict (except to the extent
permitted pursuant to the provisions of Article VIII hereinafter
set forth) the use of the Lands for the benefit of the city and
persons of record owning real property located within four
hundred (400) feet of the Lands (the "Property Owners"), and for
no other persons, in accordance with the restrictions and
limitations set forth herein.
ARTICLE II
LEGAL DESCRIPl'ION
The Lands which are and shall be held, transferred,
sold, conveyed and occupied subject to this Declaration are
located in Palm Beach County, Florida, and within the city limits
of the city of Boynton Beach and are described in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
L..AW OFFICES ROBERT A. EISEN, P.A. . 4700 NORTHWEST 2NO AVENUE, SUITE 10L BOCA RATON, FL.ORIDA 33431
BOCA RATON (407) 994-2:090. WEST I=lALM BEACH (407) 738-0388 . BROWARO (305) 760-908e
ARTICLE III
INTENSITY LIMITATION/AESTHETIC CONSIDERATION
A. No structure or structures to be built on the Lands
shall exceed (in the case of Building set back be less than) the
following requirements:
1. Alhambra Square North:
Height:
Building Set Back
Building Set Back
2 stories
from east property line: 100'
from north property line: 100"
2. Alhambra Square South:
Height: 2 stories
Building Set Back from South property line: 100',
3. Alhambra Square - ACLF
Height:
ACLF Units/Beds:
Multi family Units:
2 stories
124
as allowed by City zoning
B. The following deve~opment limitation shall apply to
all Lands:
(1) No dumpster shall be permitted in yards directly
abutting single family residential districts;
(2) All property lines between
single-family districts shall be improved with
boundary landscaping at least 6' in height;
the Lands and
boundary walls or
(3) All lighting in parking areas shall be designed
and installed with shadow boxes or smiliar fixtures to reduce
direct illumination to single family districts. All lighting in
parking areas shall be extinguished at 12:00 midnight.
(4) All utilities shall be installed underground;
(5) The canal bank to the south of Alhambra Square
South and Alhambra Square-ACLF shall be landscaped and
maintained.
ARTICLE IV
RESTRICTION DEEMED COVENANTS
These Covenants and Restrictions shall be deemed
covenants running with the Lands for the benefit of all owners of
real property abutting the land, and owners of real property in
the neighborhood and the City of Boynton Beach. These Covenants
and Restrictions shall be binding upon the undersigned Owners and
its successors and assigns.
ARTICLE V
USES PERMITTED/PROHIBITED; LIMITATIONS ON USE
The permitted uses for the Lands shall be limited to
the following:
A.
Medical and
offices.
Alhambra Square North: Business, Professional,
governmental offices, including bank:- and financial
B. Alhambra Square South: Business, Professional,
Medical and governmental offices, including banks and financial
offices and drive in tellers.
LAW OF'F'ICES ROBERT A. EISEN, P.A. . 4700 NORTHWEST 2"0 AVENUE, SUITE 101, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33431
BOCA RATON (407) g94-Z090 . WEST PALM BEACH (407) 738-0388 . BROWARO (305) 760-9088
C. Alhambra Square ACLF: Adult congregate living
facility and mUlti-family
residential
ARTICLE VI
SUBORDINATION TO DECLARATION BY MORTGAGEE(S), ETC.
All mortgages, deeds of trust, and other similar
encumbrances now or hereafter placed upon the Property shall be
subordinate and inferior to this Declaration and its provisions,
and any firm, person or corporation owing or taking any interest
in the Property by reason of foreclosure, deed in lieu of
foreclosure, or otherwise as a result of any such mortgage (s) ,
deed(s) of trust, or other similar encumbrancers) shall take
title subject to the provisions of this Declaration.
ARTICLE VII
TERM-AMENDMENTS
These Covenants and Restrictions shall be deemed
covenants running with the lands, for the benefit of the city and
all Property Owners, and shall be in perpetuity; EXCEPT THAT they
may be amended, changed, modified, in whole or in part, cancelled
or terminated (collectively "Amendment") at any time as to all or
any portion of the Property by, appropriate written instrument
recorded among the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida,
which instrument shall be executed by the then owner(s) of the
Lands so encumbered by these Covenants and Restrictions and
consented to therein in writing by the City only after the
following:
1. Thirty days written notice in advance of the
Amendment is given by the City to the Property Owners.
2. The City adopts the Amendment at a public
hearing by a majority of the City Commission.
A recorded statement by the City Manager of the City to the
effect that all Property Owners have been duly notified and the
appropriate vote of the City Council has occurred shall be
dispositive as to those requirements. The consent of the
Property Owners shall not be required with respect to any
Amendment. Provided, however, no Amendment shall be effective
unless all mortgagees of record consent thereto.
ARTICLE VIII
BINDING EFFECT
This Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants shall be
binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties
hereto, their heirs, successors, assigns, administrators and
personal representatives.
ARTICLE IX
SIGNATURE COUNTERPARTS
This Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions shall be
executed by Signature Counterparts. This Declaration of
Covenants and Restrictions and Signature Counterparts shall
consititute a single instrument.
LAW OF'"F'"ICES ROBERT A. EISEN, P.A. . 4700 NORTHWEST 2"'0 AVENUE, SUITE 101, BOCA RATON, F"LOR1DA 33431
BOCA RATON (407) 994-2090 . WEST PALM BEACH (407) 738-0386 . BROWARO (305) 760-9088
WITNESSES:
OWNERS:
ALHAMBRA SQUARE NORTH
MILNOR CORPORATION, a
Florida Corporation
BtiiilIf D · ~ co
No J. Michael,
President
ALHAMBRA SQUARE SOUTH and
ALHAMBRA SQUARE ACLF
--,
, .' i '-_ ~ ~ b Q....
.e~ No J. Michael
Bg4.g~Q
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that 'on this day, before me, an
officer duly authorized in the State and County afores{lid, to
take acknowledgements, personally appeared -. ~\ ~
and ~Li I.:.. k. \ , well known
to me to be the person (s) described in and who executed the
foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that they
executed the same in the presence of two subscribing witnesses
freely and voluntarily.
WITNESS my hand an'k- official ~eal in, the County and
State last aforesaid, this I.> day of ~Qc.-~ , 19~.
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
LAW OF"FICES ROBE.RT A. EISEN, P.A, . 4700 NORTHWEST 2"" AVENUE, SUITE 101, BOCA RATON, F"LORIOA 33431
BOCA RATON (407) 994-2090. WEST PALM BEACH (407) 738-0388 . BROWARO (305) 760.9088
EXHIBIT "A"
ALHAMBRA SOUARE NORTH
A parcel of land in section 32, Township 45
City of Boynton Beach, Florida, Palm
particularly described as follows:
South, Range 43 East,
Beach County, more
The East 460 feet of the West 510 feet of the North 380 feet of
the South 420 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of section 32, Township
45 South, Range 43 East, City of Boynton Beach, County of Palm
Beach, Florida, less and except lands described in Official
Records Book 5402, Page 670.
ALHAMBRA SOUARE SOUTH
The West 500 feet of the following described property:
Lot 16, Block 16, GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 2ND SECTION, according to the
Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 27, Pages 46 and 47, and
Tracts 2, 3, and 4 GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 3RD SECTION, according to
the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 30, Page 119 and 120,
Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida.
ALHAMBRA SOUARE ACLF
The East 590 feet of the following described property:
Lot 16, Block 16, GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 2ND SECTION, according to the
Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 27, Pages 46 and 47, and
Tracts 2, 3, and 4 GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 3RD SECTION, according to
the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 30, Page 119 and 120,
Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida.
(a:alhambra.doc (amp-doc mise)
LAW OF"F"ICES ROBERT A. EISEN, P.A. . 4700 NORTHWEST 2NO AVENUE, SUITE 101, BOCA RATON, F"LORIOA 33431
BOCA RATON (407) 994-2090. WEST PALM BEACH (407) 738-0388 . BROWARD (305) 760-9088
JJoff~~~!k.
P.O, BOX 1358 ~ BOYNTON BEACH · FLORIDA 33425
December 13, 1988
Mayor Ralph Mayorchese
City of Boynton Beach
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida
33425
Dear Mayor Mayorchese:
As you probably are aware our Association, known as Golfview Harbour Estates,
Inc., " Florida Corporation, wIll consist of 128 homeowners of which 110 villas
and townhouses are now occupied. Our Association boarders to the south by S.W.
27th Avenue, to the east by S.W. 14th Court, to the north by Lake Worth Canal
1/27 and to the west by Congress Avenue.
This letter is to inform your City Council and the Planning and Zoning Board
of the City of Boynton Beach that the majority of our homeowners support the
Milnor Corporation and Norman J. Michael's proposed "Alhambra Square" development
on Congress Avenue and S.W. 23rd Avenue (Golf Road). We being 110 homeowners
are more directly involved than any other Association in Golfview Harbour
Estates.
We feel that the two-story Medical Building, Professional BuIlding and Adult
Health Care Facility represent the most desirable zoning for this tract.
;?~'tYI!J
Linda O'Neal
Association President
cl C - Robert Walchak, v'"
Chairman - Planning & Zoning
CRANBROOK LAKE ESTATES HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. INC.
2306 S.W. 23RD CRANBROOK DRIVE, BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33436
THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED DECEMBER 13. 1966.
WHEREAS THE CRANBROOK LAKE ESTATES HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION.
MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ESTATES OF SILVERLAKE, WISH TO GO
ON RECORD OPPOSING ALL THREE ZONING CHANGE REQUESTS BEING
PROPOSED BY THE MILNOR CORPORATION.
WHEREAS THE RESIDENTS OF SILVERLAKE DO NOT ACCEPT THE
ARGUMENT THAT IT WOULD NOT BE FEASIBLE FOR THEM TO BUILD NICE
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON THESE PARCELS. THE ESTATES OF
SILVERLAKE IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THIS
INTERSECTION AND CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 25 TO 30 MILLION
DOLLARS WORTH OF NICE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.
WHEREAS THE RESIDENTS OF SILVERLAKE PURCHASED THEIR HOMES
KNOWING FULL WELL THAT ALL THE SURROUNDING VACANT PARCELS OF
LAND WERE ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. THE RESIDENTS
WERE ALSO VERY MUCH AWARE THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE
PLAN CALLED FOR THESE PARCELS TO REMAIN ZONED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL.
WHEREAS THE RESIDENTS OF SILVERLAKE. THE PLANNING AND
ZONING BOARD AND THE CITY COMMISSION WERE ALL AWARE THAT
CONGRESS AVENUE WOULD SOME DAY BE WIDENED. EVERYONE WAS
AWARE OF THIS AT THE TIME THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN WAS
ADOPTED. TO DATE. NOT A SINGLE THING HAS CHANGED THE.
RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER OF ANY OF THESE PARCELS. THE ONLY
THING THAT HAS HAPPENED IS THAT CONGRESS HAS FINALLY BEEN
WIDENED AS PLANNED.
WHEREAS THE ESTATES OF SILVERLAKE MAY NOT OBJECT TO AN
A. C. L. F.. IF IT WERE TO BE LOCATED ON ONE OF THE CORNER
PARCELS. WE DO OPPOSE AN A. C, L. F. AT THE PROPOSED LOCATION.
WE FEEL THAT IF IT WERE BUILT AT THE PROPOSED LOCATION IT
WOULD ISOLATE THE 4.75 ACRE CORNER PARCEL. THUS MAKING IT
LESS DESIRABLE TO CONSTRUCT NICE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.
THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT THE CRANBROOK LAKE
ESTATES HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. INC.. COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE
ESTATES OF SILVERLAKE, RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS THAT ALL THREE
MILNOR CORPORATION REZONING PROPOSALS BE DENIED.
\ v~;-::-J.. , '. ./
PRESIDENT, CRANBROO ATES
HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
.
Traffic Analysis
,
of the
Traffic Report Submitted for
MlillIDl (Q)lI' JP>lI'(Q) }p>clI'ftli C s
December, 1988
Analsysis Prepared for:
The Planning Department
City of Boynton Beach
Analysis Prepared by:
WALTER H. KELLER JR., INC.
Consulting Engineers & Planners
10211 West Sample Road. Suite 204
Coral Springs, Florida 33065
(305) 755-3822
I. INTRODUCTION
Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. has been retained by the City of Boynton Beach to analyze
and review the Traffic Impact Analysis submitted for the proposed development of the
Milnor Property in the western section of the City. The site is comprised of two
parcels including a 10.4 acre parcel at the southeast comer of Congress A venue and
SW 23rd Avenue and a 4.0 acre site located at the northeast comer of the same
intersection.
The proposed development includes 66,000 square feet of professional office space on
the 4.0 acre site and 57,800 square feet of medical office space, a 3,000 square foot
bank with 3 drive-in windows and a 130 bed adult congregate living facility on the 10.4
acre site. Existing zoning allows for the construction of 79 multi-family units.
This repon reviews the methods utilized in the analysis of future traffic impacts and
provides recommendation as to conformance with Boynton Beach and Palm Beach
County zoning and traffic impact requirements.
II. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODS
Trip Generation
Estimates of daily and peak hour traffic generated from the proposed site were
calculated utilizing the 4th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The volumes
generated in this analysis are compared to those shown in the submitted repon on
Table 1, below. The comparison indicates that the submitted report overestimates
both daily and peak hour traffic.
Table 1. Trip Generation Comparison
WHK Analysis
Land Use ADT AM PM
ACLF 273 8 22
Medical Office 1,934 94 209
General Office 1,011 141 140
Drive-In Bank 954 15 135
Total Trips 4,172 258 506
Internal Trips 179 11 15
External Trips 3,993 247 491
Captured Trips 190
New External Trips 3,803 247 491
Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc.
4th Edition ITE Trip Generation Manual
Trip Distribution
Submitted Analysis
ADT AM PM
325 9 26
1,934 94 209
1,011 141 140
1,500 20 131
4,770 264 506
269
4,501 264 506
278
4,223 264 506
A directional trip distribution analysis was performed from the site onto the local
, roadway network utilizing Palm Beach County MPO data. A comparison of the results
to those in the submitted repon on Table 2, show almost identical results.
Table 2. Trip Distribution Comparison
WHK
Direction Percent
North 35%
South 15%
East 30%
West 200/0
Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc.
K.S. Rogers Inc.
-2-
Submitted
Percent
37.6%
14.9%
27.9%
19.6%
- -~ --~~ -~-~----
Programmed Improvements
The submitted report includes three (3) programmed improvements in the study area,
all of which are on Congress Avenue. Two of these improvements, on Congress
Avenue from Boynton Beach Boulevard to the L-28 Canal and on Congress Avenue
from L-30 Canal to Lake Ida Road, are underway and will be complete prior to project
buildout. Based on a conversation with the Palm Beach County Engineering Division
the third improvement, Congress Ave from the L.28 to the L.30 Canal, is still
scheduled for construction in Fiscal Year 1991-1992. as documented in the submitted
report.
Project Impact
Based on the trip generation and distribution analyses, daily trips were assigned to
the local roadway network. Utilizing the criteria in the Palm Beach County Traffic
Performance Standards Ordinance, six links ,are classified as being "Significantly
Impacted". These links include:
. Congress Avenue from Boynton Beach Boulevard to SW 15th Street
. Congress Avenue from SW 15th Avenue to SW 23rd Avenue
. Congress Avenue from SW 23rd Avenue to Lake Ida Road
. SW 15th Avenue West of Military Trail
. SW 15th Avenue from Congress Avenue to 1-95
. SW 23rd Avenue from Congress Avenue to Seacrest Avenue
These same links are identified in the submitted report and the results of both studies
indicate an analysis of traffic impacts at project buildout must be performed.
Background Traffic
The Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards requires background traffic to
consist of three elements, existing traffic, traffic generated by previously approved, yet
unconstructed, projects and incidental traffic indicated by areawide historic traffic
growth patterns.
Existing traffic counts are provided on Figure 4 in the submitted report. A portion of
the traffic volumes shown are provided by the Palm Beach County Metropolitan
Planning Organization, while the traffic counts adjacent to the site are assumed to be
-3-
performed by the submitting consultant. No supplemental traffic counts are provided in
the appendix.
The submitted report indicates three year increases of traffic volumes ranging from
sixty-six to twenty-one percent on Congress A venue, from thirty-one to thirteen
percent on SW 23rd Avenue and thiny percent on Woolbright Road. These increases
are based solely on historical background data. Although there are four developments
in the study, the submitted report indicates the developments do not impact any
roadway by more than ten percent of LOS D threshold capacity. The four
developments include:
. Quail Lake West
. Quantum Park
. Motorola
. Boynton Beach Mall
Projected Daily Traffic Impacts
The assessment of projected daily traffic provided in the submitted report shows that
none of the "Significant Links" in that report are operating at LOS D, or worse, at
project buildout. This condition indicates no offsite roadway improvements are
required by local ordinances.
Projected Peak Hour Traffic Impacts
Based on the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards, peak hour traffic
impacts at the SW 23rd Avenue/Congress Avenue must be analyzed. The submitted
report provides analysis at this intersection indicating no required improvements. The
volumes utilized in this analysis were found to be within six to eight percent of the
projected daily volumes, which is an adequate representation of peak hour travel. The
report does indicate that an exclusive eastbound left and right turn lane and an
exclusive northbound left be constructed at the west project entrance intersection with
SW 23rd Avenue.
Conformance with City and County Standards
The City of Boynton Beach requires a traffic impact analysis be performed for any
rezoning proposal that would generate more than 3,000 trips over and above existing
zoning. AU major roadways and intersections within 1.5 miles shall be addressed in
-4-
- --------_.__..~-----~-_..~--~-_._--_._----
.
the impact analysis and shall follow the standards and guidelines as provided in the
Palm Beach County Traffic Perfonnance Standards Ordinance.
According to the County Perfonnance Standards, no development order may be issued
, if a roadway link is impacted by more than one percent of Level Of Service "c" (LOS
C) capacity when that link operates at LOS D, or worse at project buildout. The
Ordinance also stipulates that no development order shall be issued if any
intersection, adjacent to a link where project traffic represents ten percent or more of
total traffic, is operating at LOS E or worse at project buildout.
Based on the trip differential of the proposed rezoning and the traffl,l: impacts of the
proposed project, both the City Zoning Code and the County Traffic Perfonnance
Standards require an analysis of future traffic impacts. The projected roadway and
intersection analyses provided in the submitted report indicate that the project is in
confonnance with local standards and may be approved without offsite improvement.
-5-
.
III. Summary
The flnn of Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. has analyzed and reviewed the submitted traffic
impact analysis for the proposed rezoning of the Milnor Properties in western Boynton
Beach. Based on the trip generation analysis performed in both studies the proposal
would increase traffic generated from the site by approximately 3,700 to 4,100 vehicle
trips per day. This review of the submitted report considered the various traffic
analysis procedures as follows:
Trip Generation
The number of trips generated by the applicant are
reasonable.
Trip Distribution
The trip directional splits submitted by the applicant are
reasonable.
Programmed Imprvmnts The roadway improvements documented in the submitted
report are correct.
Traffic Assignment The applicant's assignment of project traffic is reasonable
based on the above trip generation and distribution.
Background Traffic The applicant's submittal does not provide documentation on
the background traffic analysis. Supporting information
should be submitted by the applicant to document existing
traffic counts collected, historical traffic growth and the
generation and assignment of approved projects.
Future Traffic Impacts Subject to the submission by the applicant of the background
traffic documentation as provided above, the applicant's
future traffic impact analysis is reasonable.
Conformance Subject to the submission by the applicant of the background
traffic documentation as provided above, the report is
consistent with both City and County requirements.
-6-
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
MILNOR PROPERTIES
CONGRESS AVENUE & SW 23RD ST
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
SEPTEMBER 29, 1988
REVISED NOVEMBER 28, 1988
prepared By:
K.S. ROGERS, P.E.
Fla. Reg. No. 24068
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, suite F
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
407-964-7300
I?
~/~
:;.6
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard
Suite F
Centre Place Professional Park
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
407-964-7300
November 28, 1988
Mr. Charles Putman
Charles Putman & Associates
4722 N.W. Second Avenue, Suite 106
Boca Raton, FL 33431
RE: Milnor Property
Congress Avenue & S.W. 23rd Avenue
Dear Charles:
We have completed the revisions to the Traffic Impact Analysis
which we previously prepared for the Milnor property at
Congress Avenue and S.W. 23rd Avenue in Boynton Beach,
Florida. These revisions encompassed the following:
A. Revising the number of ACLF units to 130
B. Including the Boynton Beach Mall in the
Major Project List
C. Comparing proposed zoning generation to
existing zoning generation
D. Addressing buildout volumes on impacted
roadways within the study area.
Thank you for the opportunity of working on this project with
you. If we may be of further assistance, please do not
hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
K. S. ROGERS, P.E.
KSR/jr
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1
LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2
EXISTING ROADWAY
CONDITIONS
FIGURE 3
DISTRIBUTED
TRAFFIC
FIGURE 4
TOTAL TRAFFIC
FIGURE 5
A.M. PEAK HOUR
VOLUMES
FIGURE 6
P.M. PEAK HOUR
VOLUMES
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A CAPACITY AT LEVEL
OF SERVICE "0"
THRESHOLD VOLUMES
APPENDIX B THESHOLD VOLUMES
FOR SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT
APPENDIX C HISTORICAL GROWTH
APPENDIX D MAJOR PROJECT LIST
APPENDIX E CAPACITY ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
This office has been retained to prepare a Traffic Impact
Analysis for a mixed use commercial and residential project at
the intersection of Congress Avenue and S.W. 23rd Avenue, in
the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. This Analysis has been
performed in order to determine the volume of traffic expected
to be added to the roadway system as a result of the approval
of this project, the effect that this traffic will have on the
capacity of the roadways in the area of the project and what
roadway improvements, if any, are necessary as a result of the
approval of this project. In addition, in conformance with
the policy of the City's Planning Staff, this Analysis has
been performed in accordance with the standards and criteria
as established in the City's Zoning Code and in the Palm Beach
County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance #87-18.
Existing traffic counts, which were available from the
Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Palm Beach County
Traffic Division, were used when applicable and these counts
were augmented by twenty-four (24) hour machine and peak hour
turning counts performed by this office.
SITE INFORMATION
According to the site plan, as prepared by Charles Putman
and Associates, the petition comprises two sites. A 4.0 acre
parcel on the northeast corner and a 10.4 acre parcel on the
southeast corner of Congress Avenue and S.W. 23rd Avenue. A
two story 66,600 square foot professional office building is
planned on the northeast corner. On the southeast corner, a
two story 57,800 square foot medical office building, a 3,000
square foot branch bank with three drive-in teller windows and
a 130 bed adult congregate living facility (ACLF) are planned.
The site is located in relation to the major roadways in
Figure 1.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
As previously stated, there are two major roadways which
provide access to this site. Congress Avenue, adjacent to
this site on both sides of S.W. 23rd Avenue, is being widened
to a six lane divided roadway. This major reconstruction,
which is being performed by Palm Beach County, extends from
Boynton Beach Boulevard to the Lake Worth Drainage District
Canal L-28 (north boundary of Hunter's Run). Palm Beach
County is also presently widening the section of Congress
Avenue from the L-30 Canal to Delray West Road to a six lane
divided roadway. Congress Avenue, between the L-28 and the
L-30 Canals, is a four lane divided roadway and is scheduled
to be widened by Palm Beach County in fiscal year 1991 - 92.
The other major road providing access to this site is
S.W. 23rd Avenue. S.W. 23rd Avenue is a two lane collector
roadway which connects u.S. 1 and Military Trial.
The existing roadway average annual daily volumes and the
roadway capacities in the project study area are shown in
Figure 2.
GENERATION
The generation rates used for this mixed use project were
obtained from "Trip Generation - Fourth Edition", Institute of
Transportation Engineers, 1987 and from an in-house generation
study for an ACLF. The generation rates used in this Analysis
are as follows:
-2-
'.
~ sn
ci
:.
-'
III
'3^"- J.S3~:J"-3S
ui
:.
'"
!l6
UJ - I
,.
4-
r
>- ;:
$ "'
C/)
Cl
Z ;:
'" ,
'" U! ..,1 I
~ ' ~ '
'3^"- SS3~ONO:J
z r
0 (,l c:i ci
t- '" I a:
z UJ I a:
>- III
;: 0 I w
Z lD I '::
'"
'O~ 3:JN3~M"-1 I CJ) Cl
I I
I I
I I "-
-'
I I 0 w
Cl :.::
I -J '" '"
0 -J
lJ..-l:H A~"-J.I1IV'i
z
0
>-
Z
>-
0
III
J1
\
\
k s, rogers, consulting
engineer, Inc.
west polm beach, fl.
LOCATION MAP
dote
SEPT 88
figure
1
'3"'"
w
::-
'"
'3""
'0\01
iii colD
'y
::- ",-
~~ < "'~
-" T
~- iii ~o
<Xl"
T ::- ",,,,
00
_0 < -"
0'"
,,-
--
-~
- "
~~
~T
00 T
:I: ",0 ,,0
.... ",,,, "'-
'" T ~ r :: ::::: ",,,,
T ",0 VJ --
",0 ...0 "'0
"'... ....0 co_
"'''' -'" -", tr -
'" ~O
"'" ;; - 0'"
, ",,,,
'" f': : _....
, .
I sn
o
::-
-'
lD
153\01:>.,.35
96
- I
o
z
'"
'"
"'10
"'0
"'...
"'''' '
(\J"lt~
SS3IH1NO:JOjO
",0
"'... .
"'''' 0
_... a:
T
:I: ....0
Z "''''
0 0 0'" I
.... < "'...
z w I
>- CD T
;; 0 ",0 I
z lD "'''' I
"''''
"", I
3:JN3\o1M.,.1
I I
I I
I I
I 0 I
I -'
0
1''''\011
z
0
....
%
>-
0
CD
"'\0
...0
,,-
0'"
--
UJ
I-
;jj
LL
-'
o
Cl
"'\0
",0
",0
",0
-'"
A\oI.,.1111V'l
"'\0
",0
",0
",0
-'"
>-
....
o
<
Q.
1-<
00
~a.
-'0
Cl o.
o zJ::(/)
Z ;::"'0
"'w ,
UJ _a:-
(!) x::J:t-
UJ WI-<
...J
J1
,
'\.
.
"'\0
"'~
-",
"'-
k, s rOg8rS, consulting
engineer, Inc
west palm beach, \i
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
~\g
::::'lg ~;
"'-
....'"
< --
9
w
'"
<
..J
.
w
.
'"
0
-'
I-
""
>-
I-
0
1-<
zQ.
::>""
aO
00
",-'
<0
w:I:
Q.'"
w
LLa:
LL:I:
01-
ii> ~~
w -'"
I- ~~
0
z
date
SEPT 66
figure
2
------~--~-----_.~ -----
.
TABLE 1
GENERATION RATES
LAND USE
RATE
ACLF
MEDICAL OFFICE
PROFESS. OFFICE
BANK
2.5 tpd/bed
Ln(T) = 1.18Ln(x)+2.78
Ln(T) = 0.75Ln(x)+3.77
500 tpd/drive-in window
As in any mixed use development, a portion of the total
traffic is expected to stay within the development. For the
purposes of this Analysis, the following internal traffic
rates shall be used:
TABLE 2
INTERNAL TRAFFIC RATES
ACLF - MEDICAL OFFICE
ACLF - PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
MEDICAL OFFICE - BANK
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE - BANK
5% of ACLF
3% of ACLF
3% of MED. OFF.
5% of PROF. OFF.
The
generated
indicating
average daily external traffic volumes expected to be
by this site at buildout and 100% occupancy
maximum impact can be calculated as follows:
TABLE 3
GENERATION
LAND USE
TOTAL
GENERATION
INTERNAL
GENERATION
EXTERNAL
GENERATION
ACLF
MED. OFF.
PROF. OFF.
BANK
325
1934
1011
1500
4770
26
74
60
109
269
299
1860
951
1391
4501
-3-
Ordinance # 87-18 recognizes that 20% of the traffic
generated
That is,
by banks is considered to be "captured traffic".
traffic which is attracted to the site from the
passing stream of traffic and is not actually additional trips
to the roadway network. TABLE 4 shows the calculation to
determine the actual number of additional trips this project
is expected to add to the roadway network:
TABLE 4
CAPTURED TRIP ADJUSTMENT
LAND USE
ACLF
MED. OFF.
PROF. OFF.
BANK
EXTERNAL
GENERATION
299
1860
951
1391
4501
CAPTURED
TRIPS
ACTUAL
GENERATION
299
1860
951
1113
4223
278
278
The
project
day.
total, average, daily traffic calculated for this
at full buildout and 100% occupancy is 4223 trips per
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION
for this project was prepared
population patterns and travel
area. Population patterns for
information published by the
Organization. Based upon the
distribution for this project was
The traffic distribution
according to an examination of
patterns in the project study
this area were obtained from
Metropolitan Planning
proceeding, the traffic
determined and is shown below:
NORTH
EAST
SOUTH
WEST
37.6%
14.9%
27.9%
19.6%
-4-
.
The distributed traffic volumes for this project are
shown in Figure 3. In accordance with the Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance, the distributed traffic was brought four
miles from the site, or until the project generated less than
1% of the capacity of the roadway (Insignificant Volume).
EFFECT ON CAPACITY
The Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards
Ordinance delineates very specific criteria which must be met
prior to any Rezoning or Special Exception Request being
approved. Petitions are classified as being either a
"Significant Project" or "Insignificant Project" according to
the project impact on roadway links and the capacity of the
impacted roadway links.
A "Significant Project" is defined by Ordinance #87-18
as a project which generates more than one percentum (1%) of
the threshold volume at Level of Service "0" on any link with
the project's radius of development influence. The threshold
volumes for "Significant Projects" are shown in APPENDIX B.
For a two lane road, the threshold volume for a significant
impact is 131 trips per day, is 300 trips per day for a four
lane divided roadway and/or five lane undivided roadway, and
464 trips per day for a six lane divided roadway.
Reviewing the project volumes in Figure 3 with the
threshold volumes in APPENDIX B, it is seen that this project
creates a significant impact on the following roadway links:
-5-
,,,.,,,
l sn
ci
>
-'
ID UJ "
> of
'3^\f lS3~:J\f3S <( "';;
UJ "
1--1'"
> """
~Io <( -'"
"''''
JIB lO-
W - I -
> "
"'- ~
J:
I- 3:
c' '" T
" 00 en
~ T 10'"
" 1--10 - "'I'"
" "'10 "'- "
Z "'0 -'" ~ "'I'"
'" "'''' "''''
'" </) ~, , , "''''
t ~'
'3^\f "'I'" T SS3~[)NO:J
J: -10 0<0
Z "'''' "'''' ci
0 l,) '" '
I- <( I " 0:
Z UJ I 0:
>- ID
~ 0 " I w
T
z ID -'" I I-
"'''' "'1- <(
I t/) "
'a~ 3:JN3~M\fl "''''
1---
I I
I I u.
I I -' UJ
I " I 0 "
" 0[0 " <(
I -' "'0 -'
0 "''''
ll\f~l ~~ "'~ ^~\f llll~
z "'0
0 '"
I- 'T
z 10'" I-
>- -- l,)
0 <(I-
ID UJO-l,)
::f::f<(
-0-
2::>......~
u....Jz-
u.Oc(1-
<>uz
c:o-c(
J1 I-...J~t)
\ ....Oz-
0 UJ:O!:::
'\ wcnCi)z
, Z -,UJ "
W oa:D:(i)
Cl a::J:Oz
W Q..I-u.-
-'
"'I'"
"'", "
~'"
k s rogers, consulting
englnper, Inc
we5t palm beach, fl
DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC
REVISED 28 NOV 88
dote
SEPT 88
figure
3
.
TABLE 5
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
CONGRESS AVENUE
S.w. 23rd Avenue to Boynton
Beach Boulevard
s.w. 23rd Avenue to Lake Ida Rd.
Congress Avenue to Military Tr.
Congress Avenue to 1-95
CONGRESS AVENUE
S.W. 23RD AVENUE
S.W. 15th AVENUE
It is concluded that this project is classified as a
"Significant Project" according to Ordinance #87-18.
A "Significant Project" must pass two tests in order to
be approved. The first test is the Link Test.
The Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance requires
that for any roadway link for which the project creates a
"Significant Impact", the total traffic on that roadway link
must not exceed capacity during the buildout period for the
project.
The buildout period for this project has been established
as mid 1991 by the Developer and owner / operator of the
facility. Thus, to meet the Link Test, the total traffic on
the links listed in TABLE 1 should not exceed capacity during
the buildout of the project (during 1991).
The total traffic is defined as the sum of the existing
average, annual, daily traffic, the project traffic plus the
background traffic. The background traffic is further defined
as the sum of the historical growth, plus traffic generated by
Major Projects, which are in excess of 10% of the capacity of
the affected roadway link. The total traffic volumes are
shown in Figure 4.
-6-
.
~ sn
ci
>
-'
II)
w
>
""
'3^\I
lS3Cl:>\l3S
ui S6
- I
>
<<
:x: "'"'l'
<0"""0 co
.. v(\l<O N~
"''"T<?' on ......ll>....~ "'~T
- N<n 'ltC'\lCJ>(o
,............0 NvC'JO
0 <eooa:oC') 0_ N
O~ on - -
Z N~ ~ ;:
N ,
N <f) " ' :
~ ~
'3^\I , SS3ClONO:>
z :x: N~T
0 <..l ci ......1O'It(O 0
.. "" /1 o"ttco.... a:
z w I a: "'~ 0
>- II) ",oT ~ N
;: 0 O)"'ltOv I W
COOlCO(O
Z II) ('')It)NN I l-
N- '" ""
I on on "'I'" en 0
'OCl 3:>N3ClM\I,
I I ....NLt')CJ)
('I')C\lt--C\l
I I O>N N
I I ...
-' w
I I 0 '"
0 " '"
I -' -'
0
'I\lCl1
ACl \I 1111 V'l
z
o
I-
Z
>-
o
m
71
\
\
<..l
...
<..l ~
... a:
... I-
~2 0
~I-~ ~
00< ()
<zcrw
c( =:l ~ -,
C ,,0.. 0
Z za:() a:
W - <.?w Q..
c:J t;;::t: -, ......
W _UO (J)
x<a: CJ)
..J UJ m [l. ....
"'0"'1'"
en'l:t lO (J)
co 0> CJ) ,....
(")ION N
N_ '"
REVISED 28 HOV 88
k, s rogers, consulting
engineer, inc
w",st palm beach, fl
TOTAL TRAFFIC
dote
SEPT 88
figure
4
The 1991 projected traffic has been determined by taking
the sum of the 1988 AADT, plus the projected historical
growth, plus the traffic generated from Major Projects which
are in excess of 10% of the roadway's link capacity. The
historical growth calculations are shown in APPENDIX C. The
major project traffic volume calculations are shown in
APPENDIX D.
A review of the available information did not reveal any
major projects which would generate more than 10% of the
capacity of any road link on which this proposed project would
create a significant impact within the buildout period. Thus,
the background traffic shall be comprised of the historical
growth.
The total traffic volumes for the buildout year of 1991
are shown with the roadway capacities in Figure 4. Reviewing
the total volumes and the roadway capacities in Figure 4, it
is seen that on the roadway link which this project creates a
significant impact, the total traffic does not exceed
capacity. Therefore, this Application meets the Link Test.
PEAK HOUR
The second test that a "Significant Project" must meet is
the Intersection Test. This test requires that all major
intersections within the radius of development influence be
analyzed through which the project generates 10% or more of
the total traffic on any link of the intersection. Further,
no intersection, as above described, could have an average
peak hour volume that exceeds threshold Level of Service "D"
during the buildout period.
-7-
Reviewing the volumes in Figure 3, it is concluded that
this project does generate more than 10% of the total traffic
on a link to the intersection of Congress Avenue and S.W. 23rd
Avenue. Thus, a capacity analysis for this intersection will
be required.
In
turning
traffic
addition, the Ordinance requires
movements shall be analyzed where
meets the directly accessed links.
that
the
peak hour
project's
The peak
calculated in
hour volumes
order to
generated
determine
by this project were
what site related
improvements, if any, will be required.
The peak hour generation rates were also calculated based
upon information obtained from "Trip Generation". The peak
hour generation rates used for this project have been
determined to be:
PEAK HOUR - A.M.
IN OUT
ACLF 0.073 tr./unit x 130 = 9 6 ~
MED. OFF. 1.633 tr./lOOO s.f. = 94 53 41
PROF. OFF. Ln(T) = 0.86Ln(x)+1.34 = 141 122 19
BANK 6.765 tr./1000 s.L = 20 12 8
6.09 (x) + 2.0 264 193 7I
PEAK HOUR - P.M.
IN OUT
ACLF 0.202 tr./unit x 130 26 14 12
MED. OFF. 3.626 tr./1000 s.L 209 57 152
PROF. OFF. Ln(T)=.83Ln(x)+1.46 140 22 118
BANK 12.59 (x) + 93 131 64 67
506 157 349
-8-
The peak hour volumes are shown in Figures 5 and 6.
A review and an analysis of the volumes shown in Figures
5 and 6 concludes that a left turn lane and right turn lane on
S.W. 23rd Avenue, west approach, at the project's west
driveway should be constructed to accommodate the traffic
entering the site. Also, the west driveway on the south side
of Gulf Road should be constructed to two exit lanes to
accommodate left turning vehicles.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Boynton Beach Zoning Code requires that a comparison
be made of the traffic which is generated under the proposed
zoning with the current zoning. Based upon land use
information obtained from the City Planning Department, the
traffic generation for the existing zoning can be calculated
as follows:
GENERATION
AREA DENSITY UNITS RATES GENERATION
(Ac.) (du/Ac) (du) (tpd/du) fu2.1
N.E. Corner 4.0 7.26 29 7.0 203
S.E. Corner 10.4 4.84 50 7.0 350
TOTAL 10.4 79 7.0 553
This generation compares with the proposed generation as
follows:
PROPOSED ZONING
EXISTING ZONING
DIFFERENCE
4,223 tpd
553 tpd
3,670 tpd
-9-
"<'.'~'
W
>
<( i------l
I I
I I
N '-~ I
\. ,- t
[ I
I I
~a;~ I I
cP",CP, I
... '-(S)S
,------Jf~ ;=t~~))~~ I
I HHJ\'f I
(l )l - -;~70
I (O')O~I ~~~ I
I I 1-'" I
I ~~~ I I
I g;~;: I
'" ~~;;; '-(~9 )S N I
L - \. "'- --<tov)v~ N \... J
) t~ ____~ I\. ,-Ul )9__) ~~
'3^,' (tO~)v~~../ '\ I ( SS3!JDNO::J
O~L)O - -;;;;;;
(O~~)O ,,;:~'"
7OM'o
-'"
o
a:
'"
N
;:
rJ)
J1
\
\
W
::E
:oW
-'::E
0::>
>-'
....0
u>
0 W-'
-,<(
Z 0....
W a:o
CJ a.....
W
...J
~
",'"
_N
-
~
k s rogers, consulting
engine~r, inc
west polrn beach, fl
AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
date
SEPT 88
figure
5
.
-
ui
>
.. i-----l
I I
I ,
I
. '-~ I
\ ,!a
( I
....
- I
I I
-'0- I
Nc.o~ I
'" '- ~~ I
~~~
OJ"''''
1------.; l~ -t I
rO~ ~
I t ../ \ t ( I
C - --
Ct, MOm
"'''' I
I I '"
M';::'';;
-'"
I I I I
I ~M I I
"'..
I "'",0 I I
_OJ_
'" N~O '- (99 It .,
L; "''''''' -(OlSl~9 ., \..~~ J
\..9~ Jl\. ,(90~)a )
'3^'" (OC ~ )C9-" \1( SS3~DNO:J
(9SC)0 - M~(;'
(tS )0 " .,-...
OJ
';;'(::;'0
'"
0
0:
'"
OJ
;::
(j'J
T1 \
"
"
W
::;
::oW
..J::;
0::0
>..J
>-0
u>
0 W..J
Z ...,..
0>-
UJ 0:0
Cl 0.>-
UJ
...J
~
OJ'"
"';::;
~
k s rogers, consult ing date
SEPT BB
eng'ne"er, Inc. PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES figure
west p,-,lm beach, II 6
The Boynton Beach Zoning Code also requires that a
buildout analysis be presented for the roadways in the project
study area. This buildout analysis is based upon the Year
2010 Study which was recently prepared for the Palm Beach
County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). This
information is presented in TABLE 6 below.
ROAD / LINK
CONGRESS AVENUE:
B.B. B1vd.-SW 15th
SW 15th-SW 23rd
SW 23rd-Linton
S...... 23RD AVENUE:
Military-Congress
Congress-Seacrest
SW 15TH AVENUE:
Congress - 1-95
TABLE 6
BUILDOUT PROJECTIONS
2010 2010 2010
2010 PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
PROJECTED CAPACITY CAPACITY VOLUME
VOLUMES LOS liCit LOS liD" W/PROJECT
ADT ADT ADT ADT
45,000 46,400 55,800 45,813
45,000 46,400 55,800 47,805
45,000 46,400 55,800 45,643
10,000 13,100 15,800 10,758
15,000 23,200 27,800 15,397
30,000 46,400 55,800 31,601
Reviewing TABLE 6, it is observed that the projected 2010
volumes, including this project, are below the LOS "D"
threshold on all impacted roadway links in the project study
area, with the exception of Congress Avenue, between S.W. 15th
Avenue and S.W. 23rd Avenue.
-10-
Further review of the volumes in Figure 6 reveal that the
projected volumes of Congress Avenue, between S.W. 15th Avenue
and S.W. 23rd Avenue, are within 3% of the calculated capacity
at Level of Service "Co. As this calculated capacity is not
accurate to 3%, nor are the 2010 projected volumes accurate to
within 3%, it can be reasoned that this projected volume is
within an acceptable tolerance of the projected capacity and
therefore is deemed to be in conformance with the intent of
the City's Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
This proposed 14.4 acre mixed use development is expected
to generate an average of 4223 additional trips per day on the
area's roadway system.
Although this project is classified as being a
"Significant Project", it is concluded that the total traffic
on any link upon which this project creates a significant
impact does not exceed capacity during the project's buildout
period. This project, therefore, can be approved in
accordance with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance #87-18. This project was also found to be
generally in conformance with the intent of the City's
Comprehensive Plan and this project also can be approved as
submitted.
-11-
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A
THRESHO~D VOLUMES
~EVEL OF SERVICE nOn
(AVERAGE DAI~Y TRAFFIC)
ROADWAY TPD
Two Lane 13,100
Four Lane Undivided 27,800
Four Lane Divided 30,000
Five Lane Undivided 30,000
Six Lane Divided 46,400
Eight Lane Divided 60,000
six Lane Freeway 95,000
APPENDIX "B"
THRESHOLD VOLUMES FOR
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
THOROUGHFARE TYPE
MINIMUM VOLUME
(TRIPS PER DAY)
Two lane 131
Four lane (Divided) 300
Five lane (Undivided) 300
Six lane (Divided) 464
Eight lane (Divided) 600
Six lane (Expressway) 950
~--
APPENDIX C
HISTORICAL GROWTH CALCULATIONS
MILNOR PROPERTY
HISTORICAL
GROWTH 1988 1989 1990 1991
ROAD I LINK FACTOR MDT MDT MDT MDT
CONGRESS AVENUE:
S.W. 23rd Ave.
to S.W. 15th 1.186 23,896 28,340 33,612 39,836
S.W. 15th to
Boyn.Bch.B1vd. 1.186 20,678 24,524 29,086 34,495
S.W. 23rd Ave.
to Lake Ida Rd. 1. 067 16,072 17,149 18,298 19,523
S.W. 23RD AVENUE:
Site to Congress 1.094 8,892 9,728 10,642 11,643
Congress to
Military Trail 1.074 9,315 10,004 10,745 11,540
Site to Seacrest 1.042 10,246 10,749 11,200 11,671
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD (S.W. 15th Avenue)
Congress to 1-95 1. 091 17,468 19,057 20,792 22,684
APPENDIX D
MILNOR PROPERTY
MAJOR PROJECT TRAFFIC
A. LIST OF MAJOR PROJECTS IMPACTING ROADWAY
LINKS WITHIN PROJECT STUDY AREA:
1. Quail Lake West
2. Quantum Park
3. Motorol a
4. Boynton Beach Mall
B. TRAFFIC FROM ALL OF THESE MAJOR PROJECTS
WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE MAJOR PROJECT
DISTRIBUTION FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON:
1. All of the projects are expected to generate less than
an additional 1,310 trips per day on both S.W. 23rd Avenue,
between Military Trail and Seacrest Boulevard and an
additional 4,640 trips per day on Congress Avenue, between
Boynton Beach Boulevard and Lake Ida Road, during the buildout
period of this project.
L
EXHIBIT E-l
TRANSPORTATION k_3EARCH CENTER
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS & SW 23 AVE
DATE AM PEAK
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE B
SATURATION 60
CRITICAL NIS VOL 408
CRITICAL EIW VOL 579
CRITICAL ~UM 987
*************************************
LANE
NORTHBOUND
MOV WIDTH
LANE GEOME'rRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOUND
MOV WIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
RT.
T. .
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
RT.
T. .
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
RT.
L. .
12.0
12.0
RT.
L. .
12.0
12.0
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
77
403
62
203
751
110
123
265
95
171
243
129
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
PHASING Nls
Elw
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
:4.
:4.
l.
: 90
BOTH TURNS
BOTH TURNS
o
PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
- 99 (#PEDS/HR)
SECONDS
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
INPUT VOLUME
ADJUSTED VOL
CAPACITY
MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND
77
45
o
NIA
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
363 419 433
199 101 160
LEFT TURN CHECK
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
203 123 171
199 101 160
0 0 0
NIA NIA NIA
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
196
45
EXHIBIT E-2
TRANSPORTATION k~SEARCH CENTER
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS & SW 23 AVE
DATE PM PEAK
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE B
SATURATION 56
CRITICAL N/S VOL 387
CRITICAL E/W VOL 540
CRITICAL ~UM 927
*************************************
LANE
NORTHBOUND
MOV WIDTH
LANE GEOMETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOUND
MOV WIDTH
L. .
12.0
12.0
RT.
L. .
12.0
12.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
RT.
T. .
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
RT.
T. .
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
RT.
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
106
570
86
130
358
94
83
216
49
104
264
155
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
:4.
:4.
: 1.
: 90
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH
o - 99 (#PEDS/HR)
OVERLAP)
OVERLAP)
SECONDS
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
THRU -RIGHT 277 189 309 488
LEFT 80 110 52 78
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
INPUT VOLUME 106 130 83 104
ADJUSTED VOL 80 110 52 78
CAPACITY 0 0 0 0
MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
MILNOR PROPERTIES
CONGRESS AVENUE & SW 23RD ST
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
SEPTEMBER 29, 1988
REVISED NOVEMBER 28, 1988
Prepared By:
K.S. ROGERS, P.E.
Fla. Reg. No. 24068
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
407-964-7300
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC.
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard
Suite F
Centre Place Professional Park
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
407-964-7300
November 28, 1988
Mr. Charles Putman
Charles Putman & Associates
4722 N.W. Second Avenue, Suite 106
Boca Raton, FL 33431
RE: Milnor Property
Congress Avenue & S.W. 23rd Avenue
Dear Charles:
We have completed the revisions to the Traffic Impact Analysis
which we previously prepared for the Milnor property at
Congress Avenue and S.W. 23rd Avenue in Boynton Beach,
Florida. These revisions encompassed the following:
A. Revising the number of ACLF units to 130
B. Including the Boynton Beach Mall in the
Major Project List
C. Comparing proposed zoning generation to
existing zoning generation
D. Addressing buildout volumes on impacted
roadways within the study area.
Thank you for the
you. If we may
hesitate to call.
opportunity of working on this project with
be of further assistance, please do not
Very truly yours,
K. S. ROGERS, P.E.
KSR/jr
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1
LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2
EXISTING ROADWAY
CONDITIONS
FIGURE 3
DISTRIBUTED
TRAFFIC
PI GURE 4
TOTAL TRAFFIC
FIGURE 5
A.M. PEAK HOUR
VOLUMES
FIGURE 6
P.M. PEAK HOUR
VOLUMES
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A CAPACITY AT LEVEL
OF SERVICE "Dlt
THRESHOLD VOLUMES
APPENDIX B THESHOLD VOLUMES
FOR SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT
APPENDIX C HISTORICAL GROWTH
APPENDIX D MAJOR PROJECT LIST
APPENDIX E CAPACITY ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
This office has been retained to prepare a Traffic Impact
Analysis for a mixed use commercial and residential project at
the intersection of Congress Avenue and S.W. 23rd Avenue, in
the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. This Analysis has been
performed in order to determine the volume of traffic expected
to be added to the roadway system as a result of the approval
of this project, the effect that this traffic will have on the
capacity of the roadways in the area of the project and what
roadway improvements, if any, are necessary as a result of the
approval of this project. In addition, in conformance with
the policy of the City's Planning Staff, this Analysis has
been performed in accordance with the standards and criteria
as established in the City's Zoning Code and in the Palm Beach
County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance #87-18.
Existing traffic counts, which were available from the
Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Palm Beach County
Traffic Division, were used when applicable and these counts
were augmented by twenty-four (24) hour machine and peak hour
turning counts performed by this office.
SITE INFORMATION
According to the site plan, as prepared by Charles Putman
and Associates, the petition comprises two sites. A 4.0 acre
parcel on the northeast corner and a 10.4 acre parcel on the
southeast corner of Congress Avenue and S.W. 23rd Avenue. A
two story 66,600 square foot professional office building is
planned on the northeast corner. On the southeast corner, a
two story 57,800 square foot medical office building, a 3,000
square foot branch bank with three dr1ve-in teller windows and
a 130 bed adult congregate living facility (ACLF) are planned.
The site is located in relation to the major roadways in
Figure 1.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
As previously stated, there are two major roadways which
provide access to this site. Congress Avenue, adjacent to
this site on both sides of S.W. 23rd Avenue, is being widened
to a six lane divided roadway. This major reconstruction,
which is being performed by Palm Beach County, extends from
Boynton Beach Boulevard to the Lake Worth Drainage District
Canal L-28 (north boundary of Hunter's Run). Palm Beach
County is also presently widening the section of Congress
Avenue from the L-30 Canal to Delray West Road to a six lane
divided roadway. Congress Avenue, between the L-28 and the
L-30 Canals, is a four lane divided roadway and is scheduled
to be widened by Palm Beach County in fiscal year 1991 - 92.
The other major road providing access to this site is
S.W. 23rd Avenue. S.W. 23rd Avenue is a two lane collector
roadway which connects u.S. 1 and Military Trial.
The existing roadway average annual daily volumes and the
roadway capacities in the project study area are shown in
Figure 2.
GENERATION
The generation rates used for this mixed use project were
obtained from "Trip Generation - Fourth Edition", Institute of
Transportation Engineers, 1987 and from an in-house generation
study for an ACLF. The generation rates used in this Analysis
are as follows:
-2-
J1
\
\
k s rogers, consulting
engineer, Inc
west palm beach, fl
LOCATION MAP
dote
SEPT 88
figure
,
. --,-------_._._-_.._---~--
~ sn
c
>
...J
'" ui T
",0
'3^'o' > ",-
lS3110'o'3S '" "'~
~~ "'10
_N
~~ w ....0
T ",N
"'0 > "'0 ",,,,
00 '" "'N _N
_0 "''''
0" NN
S6 N-
ui --
- I ~~
> _N
4. ~~
~..O
00 -10
r "'0 NO
>- "'.. 'T
'" T ~ "''''
T Q' T ",0 CJ) "'10 --~ --
_ 0 Q- "'0 "0 ",0
"0 "'.. ....0 -I;;; r
c "'0 "'''' -'"
"'- ....0
Z N'" N" ;: 0"
N , "''''
N CJ) ['I ~ , -..
'3^'o' T T SS311DNOO or
r "-0 "'0 "'0
z "'.. "'.. "'.. ' T
0 u 0'" I "'''' "'''' C NO
>- '" N" N" C _.. a: T ~~
z w I a:
>- '" T "-0 (\IV
;: 0 "'0 I w "'-
'" "'.. ....'"
z "'''' I !: --
4.
N" I r l/) c
'Oil 30N311M'o'1 ..0
I I N-
O'"
I I
I I "-
-' T w
I . 0 "'0 "
c " "'0 '"
I ...J "'0 ...J
0 -'"
1l'o'll1 T All'o'111lVi
z "'0 ~
"'0
0 "'0
>- -'"
z >- CJ)
>- >- 0
0 U ...J
'" '" >-
0. '"
>-'"
cu >-
~o. t:
u
...Jc >-'"
" o.
C zrCJ) zo.
",,,,
J1 \ z j:Cf)o OU
w CJ)W...J
, _a: Uc
, Cl xr>- "...J
W w>-'" ",0
..J wr
"'10 0.CJ)
w
"';:' "-a:
"-r
-", 0>-
"'-
CJ) ~~
W _N
>- ~-
0
z
k s rogers, consulting dole
SEPT 88
engineer, inc EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS figure
west palm beach, II
2
TABLE 1
GENERATION RATES
LAND USE
RATE
ACLF
MEDICAL OFFICE
PROFESS. OFFICE
BANK
2.5 tpd/bed
Ln(T) = 1.18Ln(x)+2.78
Ln(T) = 0.75Ln(x)+3.77
500 tpd/drive-in window
As in any mixed use development, a portion of the total
traffic is expected to stay within the development. For the
purposes of this Analysis, the following internal traffic
rates shall be used:
TABLE 2
INTERNAL TRAFFIC RATES
ACLF - MEDICAL OFFICE
ACLF - PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
MEDICAL OFFICE - BANK
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE - BANK
5% of ACLF
3% of ACLF
3% of MED. OFF.
5% of PROF. OFF.
The
generated
indicating
average daily external
by this site at
traffic volumes expected to be
buildout and 100% occupancy
maximum impact can be calculated as follows:
TABLE 3
GENERATION
LAND USE
TOTAL
GENERATION
INTERNAL
GENERATION
EXTERNAL
GENERATION
ACLF
MED. OFF.
PROF. OFF.
BANK
325
1934
1011
1500
4770
26
74
60
109
269
299
1860
951
1391
4501
-3-
Ordinance # 87-18 recognizes that 20% of the traffic
generated by banks is considered to be "captured traffic".
That is, traffic which is attracted to the site from the
passing stream of traffic and is not actually additional trips
to the roadway network. TABLE 4 shows the calculation to
determine the actual number of aJditional trips this project
is expected to add to the roadway network:
TABLE 4
CAPTURED TRIP ADJUSTMENT
278
278
ACTUAL
GENERATION
299
1860
951
1113
4223
LAND USE
ACLF
MED. OFF.
PROF. OFF.
BANK
EXTERNAL
GENERATION
299
1860
951
1391
4501
CAPTURED
TRIPS
The total, average, daily traffic calculated for this
project at full buildout and 100% occupancy is 4223 trips per
day.
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION
The traffic distribution
according to an examination of
patterns in the project study
this area were obtained from
for this project was prepared
population patterns and travel
area. Population patterns for
information published by the
Metropolitan Planning Organization. Based upon the
proceeding, the traffic distribution for this project was
determined and is shown below:
NORTH
EAST
SOUTH
WEST
37.6%
14.9%
27.9%
19.6%
-4-
The distributed traffic volumes for this project are
shown in Figure 3. In accordance with the Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance, the distributed traffic was brought four
miles from the site, or until the project generated less than
1% of the capacity of the roadway (Insignificant Volume).
EFFECT ON CAPACITY
The Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards
Ordinance delineates very specific criteria which must be met
prior to any Rezoning or Special Exception Request being
approved. Petitions are classified as being either a
"Significant Project" or "Insignificant project" according to
the project impact on roadway links and the capacity of the
impacted roadway links.
A "Significant Project" is defined by Ordinance #87-18
as a project which generates more than one percentum (1%) of
the threshold volume at Level of Service "D" on any link with
the project's radius of development influence. The threshold
volumes for "Significant Projects" are shown in APPENDIX B.
For a two lane road, the threshold volume for a significant
impact is 131 trips per day, is 300 trips per day for a four
lane divided roadway and/or five lane undivided roadway, and
464 trips per day for a six lane divided roadway.
Reviewing the project volumes in Figure 3 with the
threshold volumes in APPENDIX B, it is seen that this project
creates a significant impact on the following roadway links:
-5-
'".".
I sn
0
>
-'
III W "
'3^V > "'I;:;
!S3H::JV3S "" "'~
w "
"I'"
> "''''
~r "" ~'"
"'"
S6 "'-
W - I ~
.,. "
"- ~
:I:
I- ;:
'" T
" 00 (f)
" T "''''
"'" "'I'"
0 "10 "'- "
z "'0 -<t :;: "'I"
'" "'''' "''''
N (f) [' ~ : M"
'3^V "'I" T SS3H8NO::J
:I: ~'" 0",
Z "'" "''' ci
0 0 '" .
I- "" I 0 II:
Z w I a:
>- III
:;: 0 " I w
III "'j"
Z -'" I t::
"'" T ""
I en
'aH 3::JN3HMVl "'''' 0
,,~
I I
I I
I I u..
-' w
I " I 0 "
0 010 CJ ""
I -' "10 -'
0 "''''
lIVH.L ~g "'~ AHV .L111~
z "'0
0 '"
I- "'1-
z "'''' I-
>- -- 0
0 ""I-
III wo.o
~~""
-0.
!2::J~~
u.....Jz-
u...o<.....
<>uz
0::0-<
J1 I-..J~O
\ .....oz-
, 0 OX"'!::
, Z ww(i)Z
"'>w CJ
W oa:O::(;5
Cl a:xoz
W Q.t-u...-
....J
"'I"
"'", "
g:"
k s rogers, consulling
engineer, Inc.
west palm beach, II
DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC
REVISED 2B NOV BB
dole
SEPT 88
figure
3
TABLE 5
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
CONGRESS AVENUE
S.W. 23RD AVENUE
S.W. 15th AVENUE
S.W. 23rd Avenue to Boynton
Beach Boulevard
S.W. 23rd Avenue to Lake Ida Rd.
Congress Avenue to Military Tr.
Congress Avenue to 1-95
CONGRESS AVENUE
It is concluded that this project is classified as a
"Significant Project" according to Ordinance #87-18.
A "Significant Project" must pass two tests in order to
be approved. The first test is the Link Test.
The Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance requires
that for any roadway link for which the project creates a
"Significant Impact", the total traffic on that roadway link
must not exceed capacity during the buildout period for the
project.
The buildout period for this project has been established
as mid 1991 by the Developer and owner / operator of the
facility. Thus, to meet the Link Test, the total traffic on
the links listed in TABLE 1 should not exceed capacity during
the buildout of the project (during 1991).
The total traffic is defined as the sum of the existing
average, annual, daily traffic, the project traffic plus the
background traffic. The background traffic is further defined
as the sum of the historical growth, plus traffic generated by
Major Projects, which are in excess of 10% of the capacity of
the affected roadway link. The total traffic volumes are
shown in Figure 4.
-6-
~ sn
ci
>
..J
ID ui
'3^V >
lS3~:JV3S ..
ui
>
..
ui S6 - I
:>
'"
J: .n" ~\'" ~
co-oeo
I- 'OtNWN3:
'" r-...ll)......q
~ ",,,,
NVC?O
O~ '"
C ~ ~
Z ;: ^
'"
N '" r' ~ :
'3^V / SS3~8NO:J
z J: N~T
0 '" ci ,....l()'o;t"lO C
I- .. /1 Q..:l'CO...... er
z w er "'~ 0
>- ID <DOT I ~ '"
;: 0 0> "It 0 "It I W
a;) 0)(0 (D
Z ID (')ll)NC\l I t:
"'~ '" ..
I "''''''T' (/) <3
'01> 3:JN3~MVl
I I ......C\ll()C!'l
(")"",....(\1
I I CD'" '"
~
I I u.
..J W
I I 0 '"
0 " ..
I ..J ..J
0
llV~l
AI>V lJlIV'l
z
o
I-
Z
>-
o
ID
o
u.
~ ~
u. er
u. I-
~2 0
I-t-tt:~
00<< t)
<za: w
< =' I- ..,
o ,,01- 0
Z zer", er
-owe..
~ ~:L""_
_00 CD
uJ x<a: en
....J wmo......
J1
\
"-
.
",Oal\'"
en "It II') CD
co 0> CD f'...
C")ll)(\/ N
"'~ '"
k, s rogers, consulting
engineer, inc
west palm beach, fl
TOTAL TRAFFIC
REV'SED 28 NOV 88
dote
SEPT 66
figure
4
-...__.._~---~---~--
The 1991 projected traffic has been determined by taking
the sum of the 1988 AADT, plus the projected historical
growth, plus the traffic generated from Major Projects which
are in excess of 10% of the roadway's link capacity. The
historical growth calculations are shewn in APPENDIX C. The
major project traffic volume calculations are shown in
APPENDIX D.
A review of the available information did not reveal any
major projects which would generate more than 10% of the
capacity of any road link on which this proposed project would
create a significant impact within the buildout period. Thus.
the background traffic shall be comprised of the historical
growth.
The total traffic volumes for the buildout year of 1991
are shown with the roadway capacities in Figure 4. Reviewing
the total volumes and the roadway capacities in Figure 4, it
is seen that on the roadway link which this project creates a
significant impact, the total traffic does not exceed
capacity. Therefore, this Application meets the Link Test.
PEAK HOUR
The second test that a "Significant Project" must meet is
the Intersection Test. This test requires that all major
intersections within the radius of development influence be
analyzed through which the project generates 10% or more of
the total traffic on any link of the intersection. Further,
no intersection, as above described, could have an average
peak hour volume that exceeds threshold Level of Service "0"
during the buildout period.
-7-
Reviewing the volumes in Figure 3, it is concluded that
this project does generate more than 10% of the total traffic
on a link to the intersection of Congress Avenue and S.W. 23rd
Avenue. Thus, a capacity analysis for this intersection will
be required.
In addition, the
turning movements shall
traffic meets the directly
Ordinance requires
be analyzed where
accessed links.
that
the
peak hour
project's
The peak hour volumes generated
calculated in order to determine
improvements, if any, will be required.
by this project were
what site related
The peak hour generation rates were also calculated based
upon information obtained from "Trip Generation". The peak
hour generation rates used for this project have be",n
determined to be:
PEAK HOUR - A.M.
IN OUT
ACLF 0.073 tr./unit x 130 = 9 6 -r
MED. OFF. 1. 633 tr./1000 s.t. = 94 53 41
PROF. OFF. Ln(T) = 0.86Ln(x)+l.34 = 141 122 19
BANK 6.765 tr./lOOO s.f. = 20 12 8
6.09 (x) + 2.0 264 193 7T
PEAK HOUR - P.M.
IN OUT
ACLF 0.202 tr./unit x 130 26 14 1"2'
MED. OFF. 3.626 tr./1000 s.t. 209 57 152
PROF. OFF. Ln(T)=.83Ln(x)+1.46 140 22 118
BANK 12.59 (x) + 93 131 64 67
506 157 349
-8-
The peak hour volumes are shown in Figures 5 and 6.
A review and an analysis of the volumes shown in Figures
5 and 6 concludes that a left turn lane and right turn lane on
S.W. 23rd Avenue, west approach, at the project's west
driveway should be constructed to accommodate the traffic
entering the site. Also, the west driveway on the south side
of Gulf Road should be constructed to two exit lanes to
accommodate left turning vehicles.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Boynton Beach Zoning Code requires that a comparison
be made of the traffic which is generated under the proposed
zoning with the current zoning. Based upon land use
information obtained from the City Planning Department, the
traffic generation for the existing zoning can be calculated
as follows:
GENERATION
AREA DENSITY UNITS RATES GENERATION
(Ac. ) (du/Ac) (du) (tpd/du) .(tpd)
N.E. Corner 4.0 7.26 29 7.0 203
S.E. Corner 10.4 4.84 50 7.0 350
TOTAL 10.4 79 7.0 553
This generation compares with the proposed generation as
follows:
PROPOSED ZONING
EXISTING ZONING
DIFFERENCE
4,223 tpd
553 tpd
3,670 tpd
-9-
ui
>
.. i-----l
I I
I I
'" '--L I
\. ,€
( I
0
~ I
I
I
~ I
~<D~
<D",<D \...(9 )9 I
...
~~~
I------)r~ -(~ )~
r(€~)€~ I
I (L)L J lle I
(~)~ - ...<D<D
(OLlOL, C7)~~
I I ~~~ I
"'O<D
",~...
I I I I
I ~~~ I I
I "''''~ !
"'....... I
~N~
'" oo~ '--(~9 )9 '"
L; \.€~ "'~ -(€Ot)t~ '" \.. L L j
-- Jl\. ,(ll )9 )
'3^V (€O~lHLJ 11( SS3~HJNO:>
(L 9 l)O - ~~~
"'''''''
(OL L)O "'- N"'",
~N
~MO
~'"
0
a:
'"
'"
;:
'"
J1 \
'\.
,
W
~
::>w
-'~
0::>
>-'
....0
()>
0 W-'
-,..
Z 0....
W 0:0
Cl a.....
W
...J
~
",'"
~'"
~
~
k s, rogers, consulting dole
SEPT 88
engineo.r, inc AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES figure
west palm beach, fl
5
w
>
<< i-----l
I I
[ I
.. '-? I
\. ,€~
(' I
...
- I
,
-'O- j
C\l(O~ I
'" '- ?? I
~~~
"'''''''
i------/T'\. -~ I
,--O~~
I ~ J '\ 1(' I
€ - 'Me';
I €~, "'0> 1
'"
~-~
I i "'...0>
_0>
I I
I _M I I
"'....
I "'",0 I I
-"'- I
'" C::;~O '- (99 l~ '"
L; 0>"'''' -(OLSl?9 '" \..~ ~ J
\.9 ~ ----~ I\. ,-(90~la _)
'3^'" (O€ ~ 1€9--' \If SS3!mNO:J
(IlS€)O - 'MtOt;
(~8 10 " ",-..
'"
~-~
",,,,0
'"
0
a:
'"
'"
;:
rn
J1 \
\
Ul
:l:
~Ul
..J::!
O~
>..J
....0
u>
0 Ul..J
-,<<
Z 0....
W 0:0
C!J 11.....
W
..J
~
",'"
",-
'"
~
k s, rogers, consulting date
SEPT BB
eng'ne8r, Inc. PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES figure
wpst pdm beach, fl
6
The Boynton Beach Zoning Code also requires that a
buildout analysis be presented for the roadways in the project
study area. This buildout analysis is based upon the Year
2010 Study which was recently prepared for the Palm Beach
County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). This
information is presented in TABLE 6 below.
ROAD / LINK
CONGRESS AVENUE;
B.B. B1vd.-SW 15th
SW 15th-SW 23rd
SW 23rd-Linton
SW 23RD AVENUE:
Military-Congress
Congress-Seacrest
SW 15TH AVENUE:
Congress - 1-95
TABLE 6
BUILDOUT PROJECTIONS
2010 2010 2010
2010 PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED
PROJECTED CAPACITY CAPACITY VOLUME
VOLUMES LOS "e" LOS 110" W/PROJECT
ADT ADT ADT ADT
45,000 46,400 55,800 45,813
45,000 46,400 55,800 47,805
45,000 46,400 55,800 45,643
10,000 13,100 15,800 10,758
15,000 23,200 27,800 15,397
30,000 46,400 55,800 31,601
Reviewing TABLE 6, it
volumes, including this
threshold on all impacted
area, with the exception of
Avenue and S.W. 23rd Avenue.
is observed that the projected 2010
project, are below the LOS "D"
roadway links in the project study
Congress Avenue, between S.W. 15th
-10-
Further review of the volumes in Figure 6 reveal that the
projected volumes of Congress Avenue, between S.W. 15th Avenue
and S.W. 23rd Avenue, are within 3% of the calculated capacity
at Level of Service "Co. As this calculated capacity is not
accurate to 3%, nor are the 2010 projected volumes accurate to
within 3%, it can be reasoned that this projected volume is
within an acceptable tolerance of the projected capacity and
therefore is deemed to be in conformance with the intent of
the City's Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
This proposed 14.4 acre mixed use development is expected
to generate an average of 4223 additional trips per day on the
area's roadway system.
Although this project is classified as being a
"Significant Project", it is concluded that the total traffic
on any link upon which this project creates a significant
impact does not exceed capacity during the project's buildout
period. This project, therefore, can be approved in
accordance with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance #87-18. This project was also found to be
generally in conformance with the intent of the City's
Comprehensive Plan and this project also can be approved as
submitted.
-11-
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A
THRESHOLD VOLUMES
LEVEL OF SERVICE "D"
(AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC)
ROADWAY TPD
Two Lane 13,100
Four Lane undivided 27,800
Four Lane Divided 30,000
Five Lane Undivided 30,000
Six Lane Divided 46,400
Eight Lane Divided 60,000
Six Lane Freeway 95,000
APPENDIX "B"
THRESHOLD VOLUMES FOR
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
THOROUGHFARE TYPE
MINIMUM VOLUME
(TRIPS PER DAY)
T....o lane 131
Four lane (Divided) 300
Five lane (Undivided) 300
Six lane (Divided) 464
Eight lane (Divided) 600
Six lane (Express....ay) 950
APPENDIX C
HISTORICAL GROWTH CALCULATIONS
MILNOR PROPERTY
HISTORICAL
GROWTH 1988 1989 1990 1991
ROAD I LINK FACTOR MDT MDT MDT MDT
CONGRESS AVENUE:
S.W. 23rd Ave.
to S.W. 15th 1.186 23,896 28,340 33,612 39,836
S.W. 15th to
Boyn.Bch.Blvd. 1.186 20,678 24,524 29,086 34,495
S.W. 23rd Ave.
to Lake Ida Rd. 1. 067 16,072 17,149 18,298 19,523
S.W. 23RD AVENUE:
Site to Congress 1.094 8,892 9,728 10,642 11,643
Congress to
Mili tary Trail 1. 074 9,315 10,004 10,745 11,540
Site to Seacrest 1. 042 10,246 10,749 11,200 11,671
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD (S.W. 15th Avenue)
Congress to 1-95 1. 091 17,468 19,057 20,792 22,684
APPENDIX D
MILNOR PROPERTY
MAJOR PROJECT TRAFFIC
A. LIST OF MAJOR PROJECTS IMPACTING ROADWAY
LINKS WITHIN PROJECT STUDY AREA:
1. Quail Lake West
2. Quantum Park
3. Motorola
4. Boynton Beach Mall
B. TRAFFIC FROM ALL OF THESE MAJOR PROJECTS
WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE MAJOR PROJECT
DISTRIBUTION FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON:
1. All of the projects are expected to generate less than
an additional 1,310 trips per day on both S.W. 23rd Avenue,
between Military Trail and Seacrest Boulevar.d and an
additional 4,640 trips per day on Congress Avenue, between
Boynton Beach Boulevard and Lake Ida Road, during the buildout
period of this project.
EXHIBIT E-l
TRANSPORTATION I SEARCH CENTER
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS & SW 23 AVE
DATE AM PEAK
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE B
SATURATION 60
CRITICAL N/S VOL 408
CRITICAL E/W VOL 579
CRITICAL ~UM 987
*************************************
LANE
NORTHBOUND
MOV WIDTH
LANE GEOMETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOUND
MOV WIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
RT.
T. .
T. .
L. .
RT.
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
RT.
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
T. .
T. .
L. .
RT.
L. .
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
77
403
62
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
I'JESTBOUND
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
:4.
:4.
: 1.
: 90
203
751
110
LOCAL BUSES (i/HR)
o
o
o
o
123
265
95
171
243
129
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
BOTH TURNS
BOTH TURNS
o
PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
- 99 (#PEDS/HR)
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
'rHRU -RIGHT 196 363 419 433
LEFT 45 199 101 160
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
INPUT VOLUME 77 203 123 171
ADJUSTED VOL 45 199 101 160
CAPACITY 0 0 0 0
MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A
SECONDS
EXHIBIT E-2
TRANSPORTATION k, 3EARCH CENTER
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS & SW 23 AVE
DATE PM PEAK
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE B
SATURATION 56
CRITICAL N/S VOL 387
CRITICAL E/W VOL 540
CRITICAL ~UM 927
*************************************
LANE
NORTHBOUND
MOV WIDTH
LANE GEOMETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOUND
MOV WIDTH
L. .
12.0
12.0
RT.
L. .
12.0
12.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
RT.
T. .
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
RT.
T. .
T. .
L. .
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
RT.
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
106
570
86
130
35B
94
83
216
49
104
264
155
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
:4.
:4.
: l.
: 90
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
o - 99 (#PEDS/HR)
SECONDS
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
THRU -RIGHT
LEFT
NORTHBOUND
277
80
SOUTHBOUND
189
110
EASTBOUND
309
52
WESTBOUND
488
78
LEFT TURN CHECK
INPUT VOLUME
ADJUSTED VOL
CAPACITY
MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND
106
80
o
N/A
SOUTHBOUND
130
110
o
N/A
EASTBOUND
83
52
o
N/A
WESTBOUND
104
78
o
N/A
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
MILNOR PROPBRTIE5
CONGRESS AVENUE & SW 23RD ST
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
SEPTEMBER 29, 1988
Prepared By:
K.S. ROGERS, P.E.
Fla. Reg. No. 24068
K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. If ~~
1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F ,
West Palm Beach, FL 33406 If: ,~
407-964-7300 ~~
?P~
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1
LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2
EXISTING ROADWAY
CONDITIONS
FIGURE 3
DISTRIBUTED
TRAFFIC
FIGURE 4
TOTAL TRAFFIC
FIGURE 5
A.M. PEAK HOUR
VOLUMES
FIGURE 6
P.M. PEAK HOUR
VOLUMES
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A CAPACITY AT LEVEL
OF SERVICE liD"
THRESHOLD VOLUMES
APPENDIX B THESHOLD VOLUMES
FOR SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT
APPENDIX C HISTORICAL GROWTH
APPENDIX D MAJOR PROJECT LIST
APPENDIX E CAPACITY ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
This office has been retained to prepare a Traffic Impact
Analysis for a mixed use commercial and residential project at
the intersection of Congress Avenue and S.W. 23rd Avenue, in
the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. This Analysis has been
performed in order to determine the volume of traffic expected
to be added to the roadway system as a result of the approval
of this project, the effect that this traffic will have on the
capacity of the roadways in the area of the project and what
roadway improvements, if any, are necessary as a result of the
approval of this project. In addition, in conformance with
the policy of the city's Planning Staff, this Analysis has
been performed in accordance with the standards and criteria
as established in the City's Zoning Code and in the Palm Beach
County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance #87-l8.
Existing traffic counts, which were available from the
Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Palm Beach County
Traffic Division, were used when applicable and these counts
were augmented by twenty-four (24) hour machine and peak hour
turning counts performed by this office.
SITE INFORMATION
According to the site plan, as prepared by Charles Putman
and Associates, the petition comprises two sites. A 4.0 acre
parcel on the northeast corner and a lO.4 acre parcel on the
southeast corner of Congress Avenue and S.W. 23rd Avenue. A
two story 66,600 square foot professional office building is
planned on the northeast corner. On the southeast corner, a
two story 57,800 square foot medical office building, a 3,000
square foot branch bank with three drive-in teller windows and
a 250 bed adult congregate living facility (ACLF) are planned.
The site is located in relation to the major roadways in
Figure 1.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
As previously stated, there are two major roadways which
provide access to this site. Congress Avenue, adjacent to
this site on both sides of S.W. 23rd Avenue, is being widened
to a six lane divided roadway. This major reconstruction,
which is being performed by Palm Beach County, extends from
Boynton Beach Boulevard to the Lake Worth Drainage District
Canal L-28 (north boundary of Hunter's Run). Palm Beach
County is also presently widening the section of Congress
Avenue from the L-30 Canal to Delray West Road to a six lane
divided roadway. Congress Avenue, between the L-28 and the
L-30 Canals, is a four lane divided roadway and is scheduled
to be widened by Palm Beach County in fiscal year 1991 - 92.
The other major road providing access to this site is
S.W. 23rd Avenue. S.W. 23rd Avenue is a two lane collector
roadway which connects U.S. 1 and Military Trial.
The existing roadway average annual daily volumes and the
roadway capacities in the project study area are shown in
Figure 2.
GENERATION
The generation rates used for this mixed use project were
obtained from "Trip Generation - Fourth Edition", Institute of
Transportation Engineers, 1987 and from an in-house generation
study for an ACLF. The generation rates used in this Analysis
are as follows:
-2-
,,'.'~
J1
k. s rogers, consulting
engineer, ine.
west palm beach, II
~
LOCATION MAP
date
SEPT 66
figure
1
-
-
l sn
ci
'"
..J
III
~r
",0
"'~
~~ ",'"
~
~'"
~~ ui
T
"'f '" ",0
00 '" "''''
~O "''''
o~ ",,,,
"'~
-~
~~
~'"
~~
~T
00 T
'" ~o ",0
.... "'~ ~~
'" T :: ~~ ",,,,
T ~o '" r ~ ~::: ~,~
~o ~o "'0
"'~ ....0 "'~
",,'" ~'" ~"'T =-
",,,, '" ....0
~ ~ o~
, ",,,,
'" ..,' l
~ ~' ~~
'3^V
lS31:1:lV3S
ui
?
"'-
S6
- I
""~o 0'
~ 00:
...0
~O
",,,,
o
z
'"
'"
T
'" ....0
z "'~
0 <.) 0'" I
.... '" ",...
z Ul ,
>- lD T
;:: 0 ",0 ,
III ",,,,
Z ",,,, I
"'~ ,
3:lN31:1MV'
, I
, I
I I
I 0 I
, ..J
0
"Vl:Il
z
0
....
z
>-
0
III
"'~o
",,0
"'~
",,,, '
N'Ot ~
SS31:19NO:l O~O
",0
0>"'" ci t")~0
~~o: ~~
~~g ;~
"'~
....'"
'" ~-
(:J
'3^V
Ul
l-
e;;
'Ol:l
"'~o
...0
"'-
0'"
~~
~~g ~
",0 '"
",,0 ..J
-'"
"'l:IVli1IVl
.
~
U.
..J
o
Cl
"'~o
",0
",0
",0
~'"
",\0
"'~
~'"
"'~
11>
o
..J
....
'"
>-
l::
<.)
....'"
%0..
;:l'"
0<.)
<'>0
"..J
",0
W'"
0..'"
W
u.a:
u.",
0....
Q; --
UJ .... t"J
.... ~~
o
z
>-
....
i3
'"
0..
....'"
0<'>
'"
",0.
..JO
Cl O'
C %"'11>
% ;: 11> 0
UI ~~.J
(!:) ><::I:....
W WI-<
..J
71
,
'\
.
k s rogers, consulting
engineer, inc,
west palm beach, II
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
dole
SEPT 66
figure
2
~-_..._._-_.__._,-----'"_._~~~_.------------~~-------
TABLE 1
GENERATION RATES
LAND USE
RATE
ACLF
MEDICAL OFFICE
PROFESS. OFFICE
BANK
2.5 tpd/bed
Ln(T) = l.18Ln(x)+2.78
Ln(T) = 0.75Ln(x)+3.77
500 tpd/drive-in window
As in any mixed use development, a portion of the total
traffic is expected to stay within the development. For the
purposes of this Analysis, the following internal traffic
rates shall be used:
TABLE 2
INTERNAL TRAFFIC RATES
ACLF - MEDICAL OFFICE
ACLF - PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
MEDICAL OFFICE - BANK
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE - BANK
5% of ACLF
3% of ACLF
3% of MED. OFF.
5% of PROF. OFF.
The
generated
indicating
average daily external
by this site at
traffic volumes expected to be
buildout and 100% occupancy
maximum impact can be calculated as follows:
TABLE 3
GENERATION
LAND USE
TOTAL
GENERATION
INTERNAL
GENERATION
EXTERNAL
GENERATION
ACLF
MED. OFF.
PROF. OFF.
BANK
625
1934
lOll
l500
5070
49
89
69
l09
316
576
l845
942
139l
4754
-3-
Ordinance # 87-18 recognizes that 20% of the traffic
generated by banks is considered to be "captured traffic".
That is, traffic which is attracted to the site from the
passing stream of traffic and is not actually additional trips
to the roadway network. TABLE 4 shows the calculation to
determine the actual number of additional trips this project
is expected to add to the roadway network:
TABLE 4
CAPTURED TRIP ADJUSTMENT
278
278
ACTUAL
GENERATION
576
l845
942
l1l3
4476
LAND USE
ACLF
MED. OFF.
PROF. OFF.
BANK
EXTERNAL
GENERATION
576
l845
942
l39l
4754
CAPTURED
TRIPS
The
project
day.
total, average, daily traffic calculated for this
at full buildout and lOO% occupancy is 4476 trips per
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION
The traffic distribution for this project was prepared
according to an examination of population patterns and travel
patterns in the project study area. Population patterns for
this area were obtained from information published by the
Metropolitan Planning Organization. Based upon the
proceeding, the traffic distribution for this project was
determined and is shown below:
NORTH
EAST
SOUTH
WEST
37.6%
l4.9%
27.9%
19.6%
-4-
The distributed traffic volumes for this project are
shown in Figure 3. In accordance with the Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance, the distributed traffic was brought four
miles from the site, or until the project generated less than
l% of the capacity of the roadway (Insignificant Volume).
EFFECT ON CAPACITY
The Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards
Ordinance delineates very specific criteria which must be met
prior to any Rezoning or Special Exception Request being
approved. Petitions are classified as being either a
"Significant Project" or "Insignificant Project" according to
the project impact on roadway links and the capacity of the
impacted roadway links.
A "Significant Project" is defined by Ordinance #87-l8
as a project which generates more than one percentum (l%) of
the threshold volume at Level of Service "D" on any link with
the project's radius of development influence. The threshold
volumes for "Significant Projects" are shown in APPENDIX B.
For a two lane road, the threshold volume for a significant
impact is l3l trips per day, is 300 trips per day for a four
lane divided roadway and/or five lane undivided roadway, and
464 trips per day for a six lane divided roadway.
Reviewing the project volumes in Figure 3 with the
threshold volumes in APPENDIX B, it is seen that this project
creates a significant impact on the following roadway links:
-5-
l sn
ci
'"
..J
10 ui '"
'" "'\~
'3^V lS31:1:)V3S < "'~
ui *
'" "'j'"
*\0 '" ",,,,
...... ~'" 0
"'~ a: or
S6 "'- '" "''''
ui - I '" "'~
? *r
"'- ~
'"
.... ~
'" N\O
* 0>0 C/)
~'" "'\~
'" T "''''
0 ...\0 ....'" ~~
z "'0 -~ *
:: ~I'"
'" "'''' " 0<0
C/) r,' I
'" 1 ~ \ ~~
'3^V T ~\~ Ol~ SS31:1!)NO:)
'" ~'" "'", ....'"
z "'~ ~~
0 <.> I ~~ 0
.... '" 0 a:
% w I a:
>- 10
:: 0 " , Ul
10 "'I'"
% ~'" I I-
"'... "'\~ e;; '"
'01:1 3:lN3I:1MVl I ~'" 0
, I "'~
, I
I I u.
..J W
I '" , 0 "
0 0\0 " '"
I ..J "'0 ..J
0 ",,,,
"Vl:Il 0>\0 ~IO Al:IVllllVl
% "'0 ....0
0 "'''' "''''
.... "'r
% ",,,, ,...
>- -- 0
0 "'....
10 wl1.<'>
~~'"
-0..
2:;)~:::E
u.....Jz-
u..o<....
"':>oz
0:0-<
J1 .......J!:!::.O
, ....oz~
'\ C OIC)-
. Z u,j(/)u;Z
-,w Cl
UJ ocr:a:c;;;
~ a::cOz
Ul Q.....u..-
..J
l
"'", "
~...
k 5 rogers, consulting
engineer, Ine.
west palm beach, II
DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC
date
SEPT 66
figure
3
_..~---_._-~"-~ ~--
TABLE 5
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
CONGRESS AVENUE
S.w. 23rd Avenue to Boynton
Beach Boulevard
S.W. 23rd Avenue to Lake Ida Rd.
Congress Avenue to Military Tr.
congress Avenue to 1-95
CONGRESS AVENUE
S.W. 23RD AVENUE
S.W. l5th AVENUE
It is concluded that this project is classified as a
"Significant Project" according to Ordinance #87-l8.
A "Significant Project" must pass two tests in order to
be approved. The first test is the Link Test.
The Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance requires
that for any roadway link for which the project creates a
"Significant Impact", the total traffic on that roadway link
must not exceed capacity during the buildout period for the
project.
The buildout period for this project has been established
as mid 1991 by the Developer and owner / operator of the
facility. Thus, to meet the Link Test, the total traffic on
the links listed in TABLE 1 should not exceed capacity during
the buildout of the project (during 1991).
The total traffic is defined as the sum of the existing
average, annual, daily traffic, the project traffic plus the
background traffic. The background traffic is further defined
as the sum of the historical growth, plus traffic generated by
Major Projects, which are in excess of lO% of the capacity of
the affected roadway link. The total traffic volumes are
shown in Figure 4.
-6-
~ sn
'3^V lS3~:)V3S
Ul
?
d.
S6
- I
o
Z
N
'"
"'.... "'I'" /2'
....._<aW....
<OCOCOM
0'" '"
"'~ '"
J1
k, s rogers, consulting
engineer, ine.
west palm beach, fl
o
>
..J
10
\
'\
.
w
'"
'"
I"'''''''ICO~
CO-O)""
I- VC\lco C")~
I.() ..... I/) ..... 'V ~ <0 ('I) 0>\'"
.- (\AU) ~ ~ ~ ~ _
o~ '"
- ~
::
Ul
.
,.,1 ,
, "
, "
3^"
% I
0 u /1
.... '"
z w I
>- aJ COOT
~ 0 C)~l,()m I
comm.....
Z aJ MIOC\lN I
N- ..
a~ 3::JN31:1MVl I
I I
I I
I I
I 0 ,
I ...J
0
lrV~l
z
0
....
z
>-
0
aJ
o
a:
Ul
t::
"'''''''I''' (/)
....C\l....l/')
MC\lO:>M
mN I~
"-
...J
o
'-'
<:!
u.
() ~
u. a:
u. ....
~~ 0
I-I-~ ~
00< u
<(zcr.w
c(:J1- ...,
o (!JOt- 0
Z zCI:u a:
-ow a..
wt:;::.:::-,....
(.? -(00)
W x<a: C)
...l L.1J lD CL .....
"'0"'1"
cn...,.tO Cl)
CXlCHJ) .....
C? lO C\l C\l
"'~ "
SS3~8NO:)
"''''01'''
,...10.....0)
O"'tCD ....
co'" 0
~ '"
^~Vll1rVl
TOTAL TRAFFIC
o
a:
'"
o
w
"
'"
..J
date
SEPT 66
figure
4
The 1991 projected traffic has been determined by taking
the sum of the 1988 AADT, plus the projected historical
growth, plus the traffic generated from Major Projects which
are in excess of 10% of the roadway's link capacity. The
historical growth calculations are shown in APPENDIX C. The
major project traffic volume calculations are shown in
APPENDIX D.
A review of the available information did not reveal any
major projects which would generate more than 10% of the
capacity of any road link on which this proposed project would
create a significant impact within the buildout period. Thus,
the background traffic shall be comprised of the historical
growth.
The total traffic volumes for the buildout year of 1991
are shown with the roadway capacities in Figure 4. Reviewing
the total volumes and the roadway capacities in Figure 4, it
is seen that on the roadway link which this project creates a
significant impact, the total traffic does not exceed
capacity. Therefore, this Application meets the Link Test.
PEAK HOUR
The second test that a "Significant Project" must meet is
the Intersection Test. This test requires that all major
intersections within the radius of development influence be
analyzed through which the project generates 10% or more of
the total traffic on any link of the intersection. Further,
no intersection, as above described, could have an average
peak hour volume that exceeds threshold Level of Service "D"
during the buildout period.
-7-
Reviewing the volumes in Figure 3, it is concluded that
this project does generate more than 10% of the total traffic
on a link to the intersection of Congress Avenue and S.W. 23rd
Avenue. Thus, a capacity analysis for this intersection will
be required.
In
turning
traffic
addition, the
movements shall
meets the directly
Ordinance requires
be analyzed where
accessed links.
that
the
peak hour
project's
The peak hour volumes generated
calculated in order to determine
improvements, if any, will be required.
by this project were
what site related
The peak hour generation rates were also calculated based
upon information obtained from "Trip Generation". The peak
hour generation rates used for this project have been
determined to be:
PEAK HOUR - A.M.
IN OUT
ACLF 0.073 tr./unit x 250 l8 l2 --g-
MED. OFF. 1. 633 tr./lOOO s.t. = 94 53 4l
PROF. OFF. Ln{T) = O.86Ln(x)+1.34 = l4l 122 19
BANK 6.765 tr./lOOO s.t. = 20 12 8
6.09 (x) + 2.0 273 199 74
PEAK HOUR - P.M.
IN OUT
ACLF 0.202 tr./unit x 250 5l 28 23
MED. OFF. 3.626 tr./lOOO s.t. 209 57 152
PROF. OFF. Ln(T)=.83Ln(x)+1.46 l40 22 118
BANK 12.59 (x) + 93 13l 64 67
53l l7l 360
-8-
The peak hour volumes are shown in Figures 5 and 6.
A review and an analysis of the volumes shown in Figures
5 and 6 concludes that a left turn lane and right turn lane on
S.W. 23rd Avenue, west approach, at the project's west
driveway should be constructed to accommodate the traffic
entering the site. Also, the west driveway on the south side
of Gulf Road should be constructed to two exit lanes to
accommodate left turning vehicles.
CONCLUSION
This proposed l4.4 acre mixed use development is expected
to generate an average of 4476 additional trips per day on the
area's roadway system.
Although this project is classified as being a
"Significant Project", it is concluded that the total traffic
on any link upon which this project creates a significant
impact does not exceed capacity during the project's buildout
period. This project, therefore, can be approved in
accordance with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance #87-18.
-9-
ui
'"
.. i------l
I I
I I
'" '--~ I
\1,&
: I
~ I
I
I
~ I
~"'~
"'0>'" \...(S ). I
...
~~~
"''''''' -(~ )~
1------/ j \. r(f:Z)f:Z I
I (~ H J' l~{ I
(~)Z -
(O~)O~, ~ '"
(J)~'It
I I ~~~ I
~o'"
"'-"
I I I I
I ~~-L I I
I
I "''''~ I
"'....... I
~"'~
~~~ '--(Z9 ).
on 00'" '" J
L; \.f:Z "'~ --<f:O~)~Z '" \..l ~
----J 1\ ,ell )9__)
'3^'" (f:O~)~~ lJ '\1( SS31:l0NO:)
(l Sl)O - ~~~
"'''''''
(O~ qO '. "'~'"
-'"
~~~
",,,,0
~'"
0
a:
'"
'"
::
11>
T1 \
'\
"\
W
~
:::>w
..J~
0:::>
>..J
....0
0'"
C W..J
-,..
Z 0....
W a:o
Cl 0....
Ul
..J
~
",'"
~'"
~
~
k s rogers, consulting date
SEPT 86
enginec,r, inc AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES figure
west palm beach, fl.
5
ui
'"
<( i-----l
I I
I I
.. '--~ I
~ ...-Cl
( I
....
~ I
I
-'0- I
",,,,'" I
"'~ '- ~~ I
~~~
"'''''''
1------/1\, -t I
,rOll
I t ~ '\JJ I
C - ~~
Ct, ~o'"
"'''''''
I I '" I
M;::e;;
-'"
I I I I
I M~ I I
"'~~
I "'~O I I
-"'-
--~ '-- (98 )t co
'" "'~o
L; "''''''' ~ (OLS)~9 co \..~ ~ j
\.8 ~ ----./ 1"- ,-(90l)a -)
'3^V (OC~)C8..../ ,If SS3l:19NO:)
(8SC)0 - ~~~
(t6 )0 ",,,,,,,
'""" co~..
'"
~~~
",,,,0
'"
0
a:
'"
'"
::
11>
T1 \
\
w
::l!
:::>w
..J::l!
0:::>
>..J
....0
0>
C w..J
..,'"
Z 0....
Ul a:o
Cl 0......
W
..J
~
",0>
"'~
'"
~
k s, rogers, consulting date
SEPT 66
engineer, Inc. PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES figure
west p,..,lm beach, fl 6
,.,,,'
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A
THRESHOLD VOLUMES
LEVEL OF SERVICE "0"
(AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC)
ROADWAY TPD
Two Lane 13,lOO
Four Lane Undivided 27,800
Four Lane Divided 30,000
Five Lane Undivided 30,000
Six Lane Divided 46,400
Eight Lane Divided 60,000
six Lane Freeway 95,000
APPENDIX "B"
THRESHOLD VOLUMES FOR
SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
MINIMUM VOLUME
(TRIPS PER DAY)
THOROUGHFARE TYPE
Two lane 13l
Four lane (Divided) 300
Five lane (Undivided) 300
Six lane (Divided) 464
Eight lane (Divided) 600
six lane (Expressway) 950
APPENDIX C
HISTORICAL GROWTH CALCULATIONS
MILNOR PROPERTY
HISTORICAL
GROWTH ~988 ~989 ~990 ~99~
ROAD / LINK FACTOR MDT MDT MDT MDT
CONGRESS AVENUE:
S.W. 23rd Ave.
to S.W. ~5th 1.~86 23,896 28,340 33,6~2 39,636
S.W. ~5th to
Boyn.Bch.B~vd. 1.. ~86 20,678 24,524 29,086 34,495
S.W. 23rd Ave.
to Lake Ida Rd. 1. 067 ~6,072 ~7,~49 ~8,298 ~9,523
S.W. 23RD AVENUE:
Site to Congress 1. 094 8,892 9,728 ~O,642 ~~,643
Congress to
Mi~itary Trai~ ~.074 9,3~5 ~O,O04 ~O,745 11,540
Site to Seacrest 1. 042 10,246 ~O,749 ~~,200 ~~,67~
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD (S.W. ~5th Avenue)
Congress to 1-95 1. 09~ ~7,468 ~9,057 20,792 22,684
APPENDIX D
MILNOR PROPERTY
MAJOR PROJECT TRAFFIC
A. LIST OF MAJOR PROJECTS IMPACTING ROADWAY
LINKS WITHIN PROJECT STUDY AREA:
1. Quail Lake West
2. Quantum Park
3. Motorola
B. TRAFFIC FROM ALL OF THESE MAJOR PROJECTS
WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE MAJOR PROJECT
DISTRIBUTION FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON:
1. All of the projects are expected to generate less than
l,310 trips per day on both S.W. 23rd Avenue, between Military
Trail and Seacrest Boulevard and 4,640 trips per day on
Congress Avenue, between Boynton Beach Boulevard and Lake Ida
Road, during the buildout period of this project.
EXHIBIT E-l
TRANSPORTATION R~SEARCH CENTER
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS & SW 23 AVE
DATE AM PEAK
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE B
SATURATION 60
CRITICAL N/S VOL 408
CRITICAL E/W VOL 579
CRITICAL SUM 987
*************************************
LANE
NORTHBOUND
MOV WIDTH
LANE GEOMETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOUND
MOV WIDTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
RT.
T. .
T. .
L. .
l2.0
l2.0
12.0
l2.0
RT.
T. .
T. .
L. .
l2.0
l2.0
l2.0
l2.0
RT.
L. .
l2.0
l2.0
RT.
L. .
l2.0
l2.0
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
77
403
62
203
75l
110
l23
265
95
l71
243
l29
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
:4.
:4.
: 1.
90
BOTH TURNS
BOTH TURNS
o
PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
- 99 (#PEDS/HR)
SECONDS
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUiilD SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
THRU -RIGHT 196 363 419 433
LEFT 45 199 lOl l60
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND j;:ASTBOUND WESTBOUND
INPUT VOLUME 77 203 l23 171
ADJUSTED VOL 45 199 lOl l60
CAPACITY 0 0 0 0
MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A
EXHIBIT E-2
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CENTER
CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS
CONGRESS & SW 23 AVE
DATE PM PEAK
**********************************
LEVEL OF SERVICE B
SATURATION 56
CRITICAL N/S VOL 387
CRITICAL E/W VOL 540
CRITICAL SUM 927
*************************************
LANE
NORTHBOUND
MOV WIDTH
LANE GEOMETRY
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH
WESTBOUND
MOV WIDTH
L. .
l2.0
l2.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
RT.
T..
l2.0
12.0
12.0
l2.0
RT.
T..
l2.0
l2.0
l2.0
12.0
RT.
L. .
l2.0
12.0
RT.
T. .
T. .
L. .
L. .
NORTHBOUND
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
l06
570
86
130
358
94
83
216
49
l04
264
l55
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
TRUCKS (%)
5
5
5
5
LOCAL BUSES (#/HR)
o
o
o
o
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
.9
.9
.9
.9
PHASING N/S
E/W
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
CYCLE LENGTH
:4.
:4.
: 1.
: 90
BOTH TURNS
BOTH TURNS
o
PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP)
- 99 (#PEDS/HR)
SECONDS
CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
THRU -RIGHT 277 l89 309 488
LEFT 80 110 52 78
LEFT TURN CHECK
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
INPUT VOLUME l06 130 83 l04
ADJUSTED VOL 80 110 52 78
CAPACITY 0 0 0 0
MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A