AGENDA DOCUMENTS
IV-CONSENT AGENDA
ITEM E
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Fonn Must be Turned
Meetinlil Dates in to Citv Clerk's Office Meetine Dates in to City Clerk's Office
0 March 21. 2000 March 8. 2000 (5:00 p.m.) 0 May 16.2000 May 3. 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
0 April 4. 2000 March 22. 2000 (5:00 p.m.) 0 June 6, 2000 May 17,2000 (5:00 p.m.)
0 April 18, 2000 AprilS, 2000 (5:00 p.m.) ~ June 20, 2000 June 7, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
0 M.y 2. 2000 April 19. 2000 (5:00 p.m.) 0 July 5, 2000 June 21. 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
0 Administrative 0 Development Plans
NATURE OF ~ Consent Agenda 0 New Business
AGENDA ITEM 0 Public Hearing 0 Legal
0 Bids 0 Unfinished Business
0 Announcement 0 Presentation
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve the extension of the land development permit issued 6/9/98 for one year from
the 21 month expiration date, or March 8. 200 I.
EXPLANATION: East Ridge is a small, 33 unit P.U.D. south of Gateway Boulevard on the east side ofN.E. 4" St.(see
attached). The water. sewer, lighting and drainage are in place and there is a fIrSt lift of asphalt. Currently there is a model
home on site. There are permits in the Building Division being extended to facilitate the continuing development
(landscaping, gas, power pole, sign and model home). The developer states his banking relations have been unsatisfactory
and he is selling the project (see attached contract). Chapter 6, Article V. Section 6 of the L.D.R. provides for one year
extensions of the original permit.
PROGRAM IMPACT: N.A.
FISCAL IMP ACT: The attached letter of credit (for water & sewer) is current and satisfactory and has been reduced from
$82.000.00 to $42,000.00.
ALTERNATIVES: N.A.
Attachments: egend map, extension request, sales contract, letter of credit with
?m
Department H
H. David Kelley, Jr.. P.E. S1f\
Acting Interim Director Engineering
ENGINEERING
Department Name
City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
S:IBULLETlN\FORMSIAGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
~ t;j ~
l.J
et:
Iii a=
..J
.&; ~
...
.. f-
~ g
u
:r f-
I-
et: Ul
0 .:'i
z
NORTHEAST
20th AVENUE ~
ii
0
c;!
~
HYPOLUX
ROAD
UJ
~ ::l
Z
~ UJ
et: ~
~ III c;j
'" m
~ I Z Z
W H '" f! <f
! w
::l U
~ (1)>- 0
..J U C5~
Uw ~
GATEWAY gf f-
z
BOLLEVAflI) i: <f
..J
f-
<f
SlAJfCT
LOCATION
fAC H BOULEVARD
~
NOT TO SCAlE
~
:;t.l
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meeting Dates in to City ManalZer's Office MeetinR Dates in to City Manager's Office
0 August 19. 1997 August 8, 1997 (noon) 0 October 21, 1997 October 10, 1997 <noon>
0 September 2, 1997 August 22. 1997 (noon) 0 November 4, 1997 October 24, 1997 (noon)
0 September 16, 1997 September 5. 1997 (noon) 0 November 18, 1997 November 7, 1997 (noon)
0 October 7,1997 September 26, 1997 (noon) I8J December 2, 1997 November 21, 1997 (noon)
RECOMMENDATION: Please place the request below on the December 2. 1997 City Commission meeting agenda under
Consent - Ratification of Planning and Development Board Actions. The Planning and Development Board with a 7-0
vote, recommended approval of the request below subject to staff comments and new comments to address staggering
(triangulating) the trees along the railroad, varying the number of species of plant material to include a minimum of 3
different types of species and changing the type of grass in the retention area from Bahia to St Augustine (and providing
irrigation for the grass). For further details pertaining to this request, see attached Planning and Zoning Memorandum No.
97-532.
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT: East Ridge PUD
Agent: John A. Grant, Jr., Inc.
Owner: DeGraf, Inc.
LOCATION: 100 feet northeast of the intersection ofN.E. 4" Street and N.E. 20" Avenue.
DESCRIPTION: Request for site plan approval to install entry and peripheral landscaping and buffer walls within the
proposed 33 unit, single family PUD development on 5.05 acres ofland.
PROGRAM IMPACT: N/A
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
ALTERNATIVES: N/A
City Manager's Signature
Department Head's Signature
Development Services
Department Name
II' J'
. ~ .
_" '- Jt,,(~, 1-- LL4. )~'-7'-
Planning and ZOning Director
IICH\MAIN\SHRDATA\PLANNlNGISHAREDlWP\PROJECTSIEAST RIDGEINWSPIAGENDA ITEM REQUEST 11-18.DOC
DE\ _OPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMEI..
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM #97- 532
SITE PLAN REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
FOR
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION
November 11, 1997
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Project Name:
East Ridge PUD -landscaping and buffer wall
Applicant:
DeGraf Inc.
Agent:
John A. Grant Jr., Inc.
Location:
100 feet northeast of the intersection of N.E. 4th Street and N.E. 20th Avenue
File No.:
NWSP 97-020
Land Use Plan
Designation:
High Density Residential (HDR), and
Local Retail Commercial (LRC) overlay
Zoning
Designation:
Multifamily Residential (R-3)
Type of Use:
Single family residences
Number of
Units:
33 single family homes
Square
Footage:
Site Area:
Total
Building
Area:
5.05 acres
49,663 square feet
Surrounding land
uses and zoning: (see Exhibit "A" - location map)
North:
commercial establishments, zoned Neighborhood Commercial (C-2),
South:
duplex units, zoned R-3,
East:
FEC Railway right-of-way, and farther east is the U.S. Highway 1 right-
of-way,
West:
Single family homes, zoned Single-Family residential (R-1A).
/
Page 2
Memorandum # 97- 532
East Ridge PUD - buffer wall and landscaping
NWSP 97-020
Existing Site
Characteristics:
Proposed
Development:
Concurrency:
Driveways:
Parking Facility:
Landscaping:
Building and Site
Regulations:
This request is for perimeter and entry way landscaping and a buffer wall approval for
the East Ridge PUD. The subject PUD is currently under construction. The purpose
of this proposal is to ensure installation of a 6 foot high buffer wall along the northern
property line, as requested by the City Commission as a condition of rezoning
approval and required perimeter landscaping, see Exhibit "B" - Site Plan.
On November 19 of 1996, the City Commission approved a rezoning request to
change the zoning on 5.05 acres of property located on the east side of N.E. 4th
Street, approximately 300 feet south of N.E. 22nd Avenue, from R-3 (Multiple Family
Dwelling District) to Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity of 7 (PUD
w/LUI=7). The proposed East Ridge PUD provides for the construction of 33 single
family, detached homes with a gross density of 6.5 units per acre. Subsequently, a
plat of the development was submitted to the City and is being processed. Since
there are no common areas proposed for this development, no site plan application is
necessary. However, in order to meet the City Commission conditions of approval of
the master plan, specifically the installation of a 6 foot buffer wall between the
northern property line of East Ridge and the southern lot lines of adjacent businesses
and offices to the north, a site plan application was requested and received. Also,
the site plan application contains code required perimeter landscaping to screen the
vehicular use areas.
Traffic
Traffic concurrency was addressed at the time of the approval of the
rezoning master plan.
Drainage - Drainage concurrency was addressed at the time of the approval of
the rezoning master plan and will be finally approved as a part of the
platting process.
The driveways were addressed at the time of the approval of the rezoning master
plan.
The on-site parking was addressed at the time of the approval of the rezoning master
plan.
The landscaping will fully meet the code requirements when staff comments are
incorporated into the drawings submitted for permit.
Zoning code site regulations were addressed at the time of the approval of the
rezoning master plan.
~
Page 3
Memorandum # 97- 532
East Ridge PUD - buffer wall and landscaping
NWSP 97-020
Signage/Community
Design Plan:
The applicant elected not to apply for signage approval at this time and understands that
any future sign age requires Board and Commission review at a later date.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Division recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the comments
included in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) recommends that
the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be corrected prior to the plans being submitted for building permit.
J :ISHRDA T A IPlannlnglSHAREDlWPIPRDJECTSIEasl RidgeINWSPlstaff-report-landsc-buff-eastridge2.doc
xc: Central File
3
EXHIBIT "A"
+
LO(;~\TION MA~
EAST RIDGE
t f:B?J:D II ~ h ~I^
.' .... ~/i'dlif UJ r
-- .~~ - .C: III 11'm ~
:,~t~'" ~.:
1111' ~i~~. ~E'~
~~ .l.j1
III rftTi'fllll .
II II I I I LLlI f- 1=
I .., }.. iT.
.';':':'Y,,- - p'l.
I >-lr" "'- '
-- ,
~
...
;-1'
.
f-,
....,
\-
~;JI
7/....7":' I
'ff' f~\ t7~I\'t-H; 'r- \~
... he ~
~-ih~
~/ ~/l-~ ,
\" T.,. lJ:.L
\.. .y "'-' w ~ I
I r'~ - J(;;I C 'LJ...,. ,_
):t. \ tc: C \J ~
, -- --, ~ ".... .... 1. .
:- -:- 1:1 - "-.1:V: U]-Hms . f-
~ -'-'~ 1Jl1p[ ~~, ~
~+ - - . ~L,-'<'.-I'\ '-
,- l ::J;VJJ
l~~ ,- :=' -="~:0 v(
~ r -- _.~~r~
""-r " _..JutDtI:t
~ -+= -:-/.~~~' II, I 1 11 I II
~ ~~ H..lIBl'J~ ...- (( ~ 1E=
- \-~. :ill"" --, 1
\ 1 'I 11 t ! _ll ~
'<- lr ~
"\ . ur'-f' ~.
t~ Q 1~ ;r .I~~- ~L(, rlI~ II u:'
- -j I J LO..-. ,<, I
, . . LH_-, I' ::3
- II. , I~
j' . I I I -,__ -r--l .... --,
'"\ -".t"J'-1i' -- 4-1 -~
, ~l ,,<\ J. I _y~.. C
C\ It- --:- I" -- --,
.l~':' ...,'. '. -- ~ ~ ..:..:t:;~ C~! ~ ,.
',.'_ :::: .~ ...~ ,'--\ . I--l J i 1".''''', '-' \....i- _
~ '. '.::.:j =11=-tL .'1" jr-r--" I
'--. i-- ~.:::..:...:. '. I.'~ :~-l- - ..c... _..ll"_~ ,~q \= c3'1 II I
-1= :1
;E-:-
E ,.:
1=
-'-
--
f-
ool..
, +-
-
11-
if-
i :1-
"
-.- -
Inl
6
=
I ,l .
. .l. 1. ....
~L'L ~-;-
J1~~!: i I!
-~i~) . c
I
h
,-
--
-
I~HIfr
tJ1 I,
r1J~ ".
.
; C~( ~
7'
.
,
I
I
1
,
,
,
.
.
: 1/
:j'
,,::
'.,
. - ,':'
:"
...
R3~..':
','
:::
I I III...
" ,..-..
] ~ TJ~":
...IT ~\I::
.... -1.\.... ,:,:::~'::::
-REC-- "
.ill'li ..
.-" ~g~~/\;
'I
" . .,
):
Ir:.~~~
'--i f:
,.,:..;'
~-c~1!:::1 ":3::,-
,.,...~~...-
rT T TT'. ';~ t.
,.
, "I..
',::;
'-'
..'
'-.
I'--
., lli,.-.
v.,....
.'(:-.- ....
r:., ,:...-;.
,
(.-.. -
.... .1 IT l~
,RE
..
~
..
It
o
.
a:
o
"
,
')
%
V
..
..
..
s
~
z
..
o
..
...
o
..
...
u
w
~
t
:i
i m'-,
~
EJ
, '
EXHIBIT "B"
:;
~^'"
\" In
0".. J" ~l"lU" 101,
.&, ,It. II
~ i I ~v~
Ll !In
,
u' ..
~
-"'r"-
,
rlHf.
I N89"40'02"E 607,77'
.~:i~~~~;:~~~~~~:~-;:~:::_~~j ~:fB~~---__---_m-i
. ' - ~~!Y~"0 Ii :.
... ii ,') -, , 0 r " "" ~
"'. i! "n. .1\1 "'P&. .'Rtlt I'IOll~ '
~,~ , ~ I :
~: t~t(,..r" I Y=[JC~U-f.~:~"rt U-~u ]u-'j l~ lj;'f;;} .. -L.
~~ :~. ~27 .J 28 29 f-J 30 ~ 31 I-J 32 33 ~~I'"~'. k,,!
z~ . U~:.:~ ----'r,w----'-h-=----'=-~~~-uTh-='-'--=. --l~~~l,~ ~: r ~ !
~ .{.. ~-:'<;rj- n___~I_\-n-n-n=----==...----~n--=----==i --r:-"l~. ~ 12 L., ..' :
I. Itlt, l.!.::\ I.., " " : Ot
x ;: ~~26] 25 ], 24 ~ 23;~ 22] 21 l 20 b.!! ,,~il~. "D i" '. : ~
~ L..l i I ~. I' HMr l\ f ~
i=-..'r"-~- ,- ''-. ~; ,,' :r1 :~ .[1<,,1. . 13 I ..
\Il!, II ~ III..~ I .l.:.l!....~'_~ . .~l'!.r. " : ~
, .., :"
i! 1[;."') T.__.I : " J II)
. h""a ~~.~! r.ivut rAW,~ tF,,1! Pi ~'." ttI ~ I: ~ : g
~ -~i Lh__~________n________.____n_n___n_ ____tfn___'P!!J!'-_:;; . 14 t! ,~ .: ~
-i It S89"39'~1.W JO'UB' ..../ .'-/" I: L--' !' ,:' .J: :
i\'d ..':: 19 r-:-.r-r- ,,, I !,. I! :
""!ili Ilt,,,,~ .' T." tf 'I.. :.., ; I--'f::' 15, :
'I.~'~ ,,' lj' II .,. ~ I' ~ ::.......,f. I ,
. . 11 L-J, is - l' I -...1__.'
~ .:.." ~+ '., : ---. J : ..,:,
;; 'I 18; , ~'{ - /' '. '
('of PI' .. I 0,: ""'",~~~ "".
.~ rd~ -C _'l! . ~ '~:, - ! :,:.: ,
.._~ ,:t<>l 1/-. . '. ,")..".1
;., ',~, 17 .~- \ - ,.. :1'/
~ .\~,..; ."'L . - _".I' .' / : _ .J'_~' ~ 'P.
Z "I I"~. -- :,' ':"'<'
'I' \\\'
\1 I 1 6i..,. , \ ~~ ~.IUI, 1 / ,,' I
::: ~,...J" I: / r
11 ...._~:~ ---":.......___.....,..... ___ I-:.':'----J
,.;- ~= ~;~1~=:=';.,..T=====~~=':===='-:,T- -----':.':!
- fl i S89'35'2.s'W 22'.80'
1
l.'tt.
'J
"
1
\
'I
11,1
1
I
\in .~EMf 1o'~ ~~w~&
lel t1;F ~~,., u,o.w :~,~ l'\\fltH ,i/f
r,ti r(,fl
~-
f" / t1l1
I
I
II"
'"' 1.~
r,k~lhl .~~ 11,pe!.'I.l
v & I ,..-, ~l
...a..,,,,
--
--
--
...--
---
f'I'CIlL~__.""1'IIlII
--
---
U,lMnra,
- -
.-...-....
--- .-
-..-..... -
--- "
---.-
---...,..- . -
~--
___c,.... ." .n
0.-__4OIlII ,~ .U
LMliI"'_"" .n .n
,.........-~ ... ...
''It'
r -.. '".'.1
., I'.'
..
..
___ .._c
.,._ u...
.
t.._ ,.c
..-
~
~-
o 70 ..0
NlIICUn"_~OIIITII
__-..._ to.. ....
--.. .,.. ",..
...,_ UII'.""
---- .,.. ...
-.-.... .... ...
1IItlIl_ ___ tiiii'
ataJalI~ ..... 1I1'GRPMCII.
- ""
- ."-
/60 - _n
.
80
'20
SCALE ,.. 4tY
----
--
--
--.-...-
""'!,!---...-.
.....
,
.
....___...HUll_.,
--7-
I
"f
~~.
,
J
I
I
l
J
,
,
J
I
I
1
I.
I
I
'-~ I
,,~- I
.~.c:;
Q
",":;
;l..
g
..
!
I
I
I
I
I
EXHIBIT "C"
~
EXHIBIT "B"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: East Ridge PUD
File number: NWSP 97-020
Reference; The plans consist of? sheets identified as 1st Review, New Site Plan. File # NWSP 97-020 with a
October 2. 1997 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments;
1. Palm trees shall be the only tree species allowed within utilities X
easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that
roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in
the foreseeable future. LDR Sec 7.5-18,1 gives public utilities the
authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in
utility easements or public rights-of-way. The plan shows several
apparent conflicts with proposed water and sewer lines, and other
utilities. These conflicts must be addressed on the permit set of drawings
by either relocating the trees or changing to a palm species.
FIRE
Comments: None X
POLICE
Comments: None X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
" All plans submitted for specific penn its shall meet the city's code X
I requirements at time of application. These penn its include, but are not
I limited to. the following: site lighting, pavmg, drainage, curbing.
landscaping and irrigation. Penn its required from other permitting
agencies such as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, L WDD. DEP and any
others. shai I be included with any penn it requests.
, All requirements of LDR, Chapter 5 (Platting) must be complied with, X
o.
includin).! prc\'iolls development order comments.
4. On sheet 3 of 7, change name of drawing tram master plan to site plan as X
a master plan with all TRC signatures is already approved.
5. Paving llnd drainage review has been made under the required X
improwment plans associated with the plat. Any remaining comments
wi II need to be addressed prior to issuance of a land development penn it.
Page 2
East Ridge PUD
File No. NWSP 97-020
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
6. Place a note on sheets L-2 and L-3 of 3 that identifies the entity that is X
obligated to perpetually maintain the landscaping. [Chapter 7.5, Article
11. Section 5A]
7. On sheet L2 of 3 and L-3 of 3, specify with notes and symbols the X
location and specie of sod for all impervious areas of the site. On sheet
L-3 of 3. delineate the limits of the mulched planting beds. [Chapter 7.5,
Article II, Section C.6.]
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
8. The developer needs to pay the recreation impact fee prior to completion X
of the plat documents (i.e. - Commission approval being granted).
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: None X
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
9. Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.2 requires that X
signage information consistent with Chapter 9 - Community Design
Plan, Section 10.1. and Chapter 21 - Sign Code. Article IV, Section 7 be
provided at the time of site plan submittal. Since the information
regarding size, design and color of proposed signs on the property is not
included in this submittal, another fonnal submittal will be required to be
reviewed by the Planning and Development Board, prior to sign permits
being issued for any of the proposed buildings.
10. Provide a comment on the site plan submitted for permit that the 6 foot X
high buffer wall will be finished with stucco and painted and maintained
with a color resembling the color of the finish material of the residential
(principal) structures. Include the color name, color code and paint
manufacturer. Chapler 9, Section 10.E.
Page 3
East Ridge PUD
File No. NWSP 97-020
ADDITION AL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
11. Stagger (triangulate) the trees along the railroad. X
12. Vary the number of species of plant material to include a minimum of X
three (3) different types of species.
13. Change the type of grass in the retention area from Bahia to St. X
Augustine and provide irrigation for it.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
14. To be determined.
TJH:dim
J :ISHRDA TA\PLANNING\SHARED\ WPIPROJECTS\EAST R1DGE\NWSPICOND. OF APPROV AL.DOC
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
OF THE
CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT NAME: East Ridge PUD
APPLICANT: DeGraf, Inc.
APPLICANT'S AGENT: John A. Grant, Jr., Inc.
DATE OF HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION :November 18,1997
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: New site plan approval (landscaping and buffer wall)
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 100 feet northeast of the intersection of N.E. 4th Street and N.E. 20th
Avenue
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
LHAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included".
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
L GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
7. Other
DATED:
City Clerk
JIPlanninglSHAREDlWPIFORMSIDEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA
MAY 19.1998
5. Proposed Resolution No. R98-96 Re: Approve and execute an
Intertocal agreement with Palm Beach County for the lease, use and
operation of four Transit Coaches
6. Proposed Resolution No. R98-97 Re: Approve and execute an
Intertocal agreement with the Board of County Commissioners to
participate in a single unified local mitigation strategy to pre-identify and
prioritize hazard mitigation projects
7. Proposed Resolution No. R98.98 Re: Authorizing and directing the
Mayor and City Clerk. to execute the following contracts between the City
of Boynton Beach and BellSouth: Purchase of an NEC NEAX2400
PBX. (Piggybacking on South Florida Water Management District Bid for
$457,393.42 with $210,000 down payment and a three-year lease at
6.14% interest); Telephone Central Office Services (Network. Facilities)
(From State of Florida Contract #OMS 97/98-018 and PSC tariff rates for
non contract items in amount of $16,370 installation and $8,475 monthly
for fIVe years); a five-year 'Pinpoint 9-1-1" service agreement at $4,180
installation and $288 monthly --,
Item IV.C.7 removed from the Consent Agenda to the City Manager'S Report for presentation
8. Proposed Resolution No. R98-99 Re: Authorizing the Mayor and
City Clerk. to execute Phase 2. and Phase 3 options with H.T.E., Inc.,
providing for software, training, support and conversion services on the
contract previously approved by Resolution R97 -152; authorizing and
directing the Mayor and City Clerk. to execute a customer information
system purchase option with H.T.E., Inc., and execution of a contract
addendum for said purchase
9. Proposed Resolution No. R98-100 Re: Approving the final plat for
East Ridge PUD
10. Proposed Resolution No. R98-101 Re: Ratifying the agreement with
the Palm Beach County Police Benevolent Association, Inc. (P.BA) for
fiscal year 1997-98
D. Ratification of Planning & Development Board Action:
1. 658 Manor Drive (Barbara Bradshaw) - Variance from LORs Chapter 2 -
Zoning, Section 5.G.2 to allow a reduction of the minimum side yard
requirement from 20' to 1.6' and the minimum rear yard requirement from
40' to 10.7', respectively
1
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA
MAY 19. 1998
Item IV.D.1 was removed from the Consent Agenda and Tabled
2. 658 Manor Drive (Barbara Bradshaw) - Variances from Chapter 2 _
Zoning, Section 5.G.2.a to allow for a reduction of the required minimum
750 square feet of living area for apartment units to 370 square feet for
Unit #5; 568 square feet for Unit #9, and 499 square feet for Unit #10
Item IV.D.2 was removed from the Consent Agenda and Tabled
3. Riverwalk Plaza (Lee Starkey) 1606 South Federal Highway - Variance
from the LDRs, Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 4.L - Buffer Walls, to allow a
6' high chain linked fence along the south property line in lieu of the
required 5' high concrete block buffer wall to separate the Riverwalk
Plaza from the abutting residential district
Item IV.D.3 was removed from the Consent Agenda and Tabl~
4. Packaging Concepts (Thomas J. Willi) - 4925 Park Ridge Boulevard
(Packaging Concepts at Quantum Park PID) - Variance from the LDRs,
Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 7 -Planned Industrial Development, H.16, to
reduce the required rear setback from 30' to 13' to allow installation of an
aluminum pan roof over existing ground-mounted mechanical equipment.
5. Benvenuto's Restaurant (Jean-Phillippe Gaudree) 1730 North Federal
Highway - Variance from the LDRs, Chapter 23 - Article II, Section 1.1. to
allow the existing parking area with 24' wide access aisles and 24' back-
up area to be exempt from the current standard of 27' in connection with
an addition to the existing restaurant The existing parking area to be
covered by the variance will be used exclusively for valet parking.
6. Caretenders at Newport Place (Robert Kuoppala) - 4745 NW 71to Court,
Lantana, Rorida 33462 - Modification to the master plan for Newport
Place PUD to replace medical office use with an adult day care center to
consist of a maximum of 70 guests and 12 staff within the existing 6,300
square foct building.
7. Whitfield Interiors - Quantum Park PIC (Nicole Swift, Butters Construction
and Development) - immediately west of 1-95, north and scutt! of
Gateway Boulevard - Use approval to add manufacturing, fabrication and
assembly of furniture to the Quantum Park PIC list of permitted uses for
all parcels with an industrial master plan designation.
8. Robert A. LaLane II, DMC (Michael Corbett) - 2521 South Federal
Highway - Site plan approval to construct a 3,648 square foot dental
office with associated landscaping and parking.
8
, II'
IUU;: '
~n'l
U..: .;;1
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD M TI c::
HELD IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEAC ,FLORI~~I~~BttjP
ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9,1997, AT 7:00 P.M. ' .
.~
I
PRESENT
Lee Wische, Chairman
v Jose Aguila
Stanley Dube
Pat Frazier
Maurice Rosenstock
Jim Reed, Alternate
/ Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning
Director
./ Jerzy Lewicki, Assistant Planner
Michael Pawelczyk, Assistant City
Attomey
ABSENT
Steve Myott, Altemate
Mike Friedland
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairman Wische called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m., and led the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
2. INTRODUCTION OF MAYOR, COMMISSIONERS AND BOARD MEMBERS
Chairman Wische introduced Vice Mayor Jamie Titcomb, Director of Development Bulent,
Kastarlak, former Mayor Harvey Oyer, the board members, Assistant City Attorney Pawelczyk,
the Planning and Zoning staff, and the Recording Secretary.
3. ELECTION OF VICE CHAIRPERSON
Chairman Wische announced that Vice Chairman Jim Golden has resigned from the board. He
recommended that the election of a Vice Chair be deferred to the next meeting at which time
there will be a full board.
Motion
Mr. Rosenstock moved to table any nomination for a Vice Chairman pending a full board being
at the next meeting. Ms. Frazier seconded the motion, which failed 3-3. Messrs. Aguila, Dube,
and Reed voted nay.
Motion
Mr. Dube moved to appoint Jim Reed as the Vice Chair of the Planning and Development
Board.
Chairman Wische pointed out that Mr. Reed is an altemate.
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Mr. Rosenstock thought Mr. Reed would probably be the best
felt it was suggested that this item be tabled because at th
member.
Mr. Aguila seconded the motion.
In Attorney Pawelczyk's opinion, an alternate cannot be Vice (
Motion
Mr. Rosenstock moved to table the election to December 2.
motion, which carried 5-0. Mr. Reed abstained because of thE
4. AGENDA APPROVAL
Mr. DuM stated that he had a request to move up Item 8. B.1.
Motion
Mr. Dube moved to hear Item 8.8.1 first since it will not t
seconded the motion, which carried 6-0.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
No additions, deletions, or corrections were made to the minu.
Motion
Mr. Dube moved to approve the minutes of the December
seconded the motion, which carried 6-0.
5. COMMUNICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Report from the Planning and Zoning Depar-
1. Final disposition of the Novem
Development Board meeting agenda
Ms. Heyden reported that the East Ridge PUD has beet
including all the recommendations of this board regarding lane
The items on the last Planning and Development Board ;
Commission on December 16'".
2
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 19, 1996
Mayor Taylor advised that the section on the salary increase upon Mr. Sugerman returning
to his prior position will be negotiated at that time. Mayor Taylor confirmed for
Commissioner Titcomb that Mr. Sugerman will be going back to the level he is at now as
the worst case scenario.
Mr. Sugerman requested that the Resolution not reflect that type of language, but should
reflect the concept that the new City Manager consider these types of terms and
conditions.
The vote was polled. The motion carried 3-2. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz clarified that she was
voting in support of the Resolution with the exception of Section 4 which will be subject to
discussion at the time the new City Manager is appointed. (Commissioners Bradley and
Tillman dissented.)
VI. PUBLIC HEARING:
Attorney Cherof advised that there are some amended rules from the Legisture with
respect to quasi-judicial issues. The applicants or their representatives (other than the
attorney) must be sworn. Staff also must be sworn. The public and the City
Commissioners do not have to be sworn.
He administered the oath to the applicants and staff.
A. Project: East Ridge PUD
POSTPONED AT OCTOBER 15, 1996 CITY COMMISSION MEETING
Agent: W. Keith Grant, John A. Grant, Jr., Inc.
Owner: Gary DeGraf,lnc.
Location: East side of the intersection of NE 4 Street and NE 20 Avenue
Description: REZONING: Request for master plan approval for 33 single-
family units in connection with a rezoning of 5.01 acres from R-
3 to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with a Land Use
Intensity of 7.00.
David Holzman. PE with the firm of John A. Grant. Jr. Inc" represented Gary DeGraf.
The Planning and Development Board unanimously approved this project with a large
number of conditions.
Of the 25 comments, the applicant objects to only one (Comment #16) which requires
providing guest parking. This issue was raised last week. The applicant has researched
the Code which deals with the required number of parking spaces for a single-family
development. (The research is attached to the original set of these minutes on file in the
City Clerk's Office.) The standard for a PUD requires no less than two spaces per dwelling.
The applicant has provided two spaces per dwelling. There is nothing in the Code that
13
-
-
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 19, 1996
requires more than two parking spaces per dwelling unit. Mr. Holtzman also pointed out
that other similar developments in the City were not required to provide guest spaces
except where there are recreation facilities. No recreation facilities are provided in this
development. The applicant has paid the full recreation fee. Therefore, the applicant
requested that this item be deleted. The applicant has no objection to any of the remaining
comments.
Tambri Heyden, Director of Planning and Zoning, advised that this is a rezoning from R-3
to PUD. The surrounding properties are R-3 to the north and south, C-2 to the northeast,
and R-1-A to the northwest. There is a mixture of multi-family, commercial and single-
family zoning.
Staff supports the rezoning. The rezoning was recommended for approval by the Planning
and Development Board with a 7-0 vote. They recommended approval of all staff
comments with the rewording of Comment #21 to provide clarification of the hedge height
in the buffer along the railroad tracks. This rezoning is recommended for approval
because the density proposed is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and there is no
change in the land use.
This project is somewhat unique because while the unit and the land under the unit will be
conveyed fee simple, the property around the unit is owned in common by a property
owners' association. Those documents have been submitted. All of the property will be
maintained by one entity.
With respect to the guest parking spaces, staff does not dispute that the parking provided
meets zoning requirements: However, the Building Department recommends guest spaces
because these are small lots with narrow roads and shallow driveways. Because most
people have two cars, one car winds up parked on the street which makes it difficult for
service and emergency vehicles to use the road. The condition relative to guest parking
spaces is a recommendation.
In response to Commissioner Bradley's question, Ms. Heyden advised that the streets are
private and part of the master common area. The pavement meets Code.
Brenda Williams. 337 NE 24 Avenue. said this project will be in her neighborhood. She
feels this project will impact traffic and cause congestion. She also feels that these homes
are too close together.
Dannv O'Brien. representina the VFW Post 5335. said the VFW property is adjacent to,
and north of the subject property. Their property is 184'. They carry on a quasi-
commercial operation at this location. The VFW is approximately 20' from the north
property line of the proposed project. On the south property line, the VFW has a parking
lot, a dumpster, a barbeque pit, and a storage shed. On the south side of the building,
14
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 19, 1996
there is a kitchen utensil washing area which is outside the building. There are security
lights around the property.
The VFW would like the Commission to address the screening between the two properties
because the VFW has functions every Sunday morning, every Wednesday evening, on
bingo nights and on meeting nights (two to four meetings a month). The VFW anticipates
problems in the future when the residents settle in because they will want the security lights
turned off, the dumpster moved, and the outdoor activities eliminated.
Mr. O'Brien confirmed for Mayor Taylor that he is a trustee at the VFW and was asked to
represent the VFW at this meeting.
Ms. Heyden advised that the applicant is proposing a 2W wide landscape strip which will
contain a hedge that will be 36" high at the time of planting. Our Code allows the hedge
to grow only to 6'.
Commissioner Tillman questioned whether this buffer will include a hedge and a wall, or
only a hedge. Ms. Heyden advised that only a hedge is included.
At this point, Attorney Cherof advised that the proposed LDRs talk about hedges that are
adjacent to railroad tracks being allowed to grow to 8'.
City Manager Parker Hill arrived for the meeting and replaced Mr. Sugerman at the dais.
Mr. Holtzman advised that the applicant would not have a problem stipulating that the
hedge be maintained at 6'.
Mayor Taylor explained that he shares the concerns mentioned by Mr. O'Brien. The
people who buy these homes will be looking out their back windows at the activities on the
VFW property. Mayor Taylor was of the opinion that a very thick 6' hedge might provide
the proper buffering, but suggested the addition of fencing.
Commissioner Tillman suggested the construction of a wall to protect the residents from
the sights and sounds on the VFW property. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz reminded the
Commissioners that walls promote graffiti whereas "living" walls do not.
In response to Commissioner Bradley's question, Mr. O'Brien said the dumpster is located
in the southwest corner of the VFW property. It is east of the shed and 8' to 10' north of
the south property line.
Mayor Taylor said the VFW has frequent cookouts at their facility. There will be complaints
from these residents about the smoke. He does not feel a hedge will adequately buffer
these homes.
15
-
-
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 19, 1996
After looking at the plan, Mr. Holtzman advised that a 6' high chain link fence is proposed.
Mayor Taylor said he could support a 6' high slatted fence with a hedge.
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz advised that there are now precast cement walls available which
are probably not more cost prohibitive than a slatted chain link fence. This type of wall was
used at SW 23rd Avenue. She requested that the applicant consider this type of wall
rather than a fence. Mr. Holtzman expressed concern about the cost, and said he would
investigate. Mr. Holtzman felt that the residents who purchase the homes near the VFW
might be willing to contribute to the cost of slatting the fence.
Garv DuGraf. reDresentina the develooer, said this is the type of situation that evolves
when residential abuts commercial property.
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz feels a thick Ficus hedge would be the most attractive concept. Mr.
Holtzman asked if the developer could agree to a slatted fence with a 6' high Ficus hedge
as a minimum. They will investigate to see if they can come up with something better or
equal. Mayor Taylor advised that this issue will be resolved by the Commission making the
decision and adding it as a condition. The suggestion made by Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz is
something worth investigating. That type of wall was inexpensive and it looks like a
concrete wall.
(
Terrv Gallaaher, 500 Federal Hiahwav. is concerned about traffic and asked the
Commissioners to address that issue.
Ms. Heyden advised that this project submitted a traffic impact statement, and it meets our
levels of service.
Mr. Holtzman advised that this parcel is designed to accommodate an even heavier level
of development and more vehicles.
With regard to traffic, Mayor Taylor advised that the roadway project on Gateway
Boulevard should get underway by the early part of the new year. The money has been
allocated and a decision is being made about who will oversee the project. There will be
a turning lane provided in the middle of the road, and there will be sidewalks on both sides
of the road and landscaping.
With respect to guest parking, Mr. Holtzman said other developers have not been asked
to construct those spaces. In addition, this developer has adhered to every aspect of the
Code. Mr. DuGraf questions why the City cannot adhere to its own Code.
Ms. Heyden explained that with age and the drying effects of the sun, plastic slatting
becomes brittle and the fence becomes aesthetically unpleasing. In addition. the wind
tends to topple the fence. Therefore, whenever possible, staff discourages slatting of
16
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 19, 1996
fencing.
The applicant agreed to look into the construction of the prefab wall and plant a hedge that
will be maintained at 6'.
Commissioner Titcomb pointed out that if the Commission wants a wall added, it must add
that as a condition of approval on this project in order to have the project move forward.
Even the wall will not help entirely in this situation.
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz felt it might be possible to ask the adjacent property owner to
cooperate by moving the dumpster as far away from this .project as possible and add
screening. However, Commissioner Tillman had a problem with this suggestion. He feels
that if a wall is desired, the Commission must make that a condition of approval tonight.
Mayor Taylor agreed that it would not be appropriate to require the VFW to change
anything at this point. The Commission needs to deal with the proposed project.
City Manager Parker Hill pointed out that there are some maintenance problems with the
prefab walls. Grass and vines are beginning to grow between the slats. Because of the
location of the wall, it will be necessary to hand clip the growth between those slats. She
recommended that the Commission require a regular wall if they desire a wall.
Mr. DuGraff stated the developer would not have any problem with the VFW erecting a
wall. He said the developer has no use for it. If the Commission requires it, the developer
would have to build this wall several hundred feet long. It is his opinion that the VFW
should build the wall since it is their activities which are injurious.
Commissioner Tillman feels the developer should be attempting to protect the interests of
the people he plans to sell these units to. A wall with a hedge would be more attractive
and would eliminate the negative problems for the future. He feels the developer should
be more amenable to doing something that would be favorable to the City. He supports
the developer putting in the wall for the protection of future residents.
Mr. Holtzman questioned the reasons why a 6' high fence with a thick Ficus hedge would
not be sufficient buffering. Mr. DuGraf pointed out that the distance between the buildings
is the minimum distance (15') required in R-1 zoning.
Grea Blanchard. 160 Oranae Drive. said Ficus hedges cause cracks to the slabs and
endanger piping.
Motion
Commissioner Titcomb moved to approve the East Ridge PUD project rezoning subject to
all staff comments including Planning and Development Board conditions, and with the
17
--
--
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 19, 1996
additional condition that the developer construct a permanent wall along the north
boundary to protect the property owners to the north. Commissioner Tillman seconded the
motion.
Attorney Cherof requested that the motion be more specific with regard to the dimensions
of the wall. Ms. Heyden advised that 6' high is a standard wall height. In addition, Ms.
Heyden requested clarification on whether the wall should be precast or CBS.
Commissioner Titcomb did not know whether he had the expertise to specify the type of
wall, and suggested that that be worked out with staff. He amended his motion to delete
Comment #16 from staff comments. The wall will be constructed along the entire north
property boundary.
The motion carried unanimously.
Ms. Heyden reminded the Commissioners that there is a 10' utility easement. There may
be a small problem created by the footer for the wall. Staff will work with the applicant.
B.
Project: Boynton Commons PCD
POSTPONED AT OCTOBER 15, 1996 CITY COMMISSION MEETING
Agent: land Design South
Owner: Bill Ray Winchester and Elsie A. Winchester
location: Southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue
Description: PARKING LOT VARIANCE - Request for a variance from the
land Development Regulations, Chapter 23 - Parking lots,
Article II, Section H.5 - Clearance at major driveways to reduce
the required distance of the interior access aisle to the
driveway on Old Boynton Road from 100 feet to 65 feet.
i
Mayor Taylor advised that this item will be continued to the December 3 meeting.
Ms. Heyden advised that a TRC meeting was held with the applicant today, and the
applicant and staff have worked out the dumpster issue. The parking lot variance is now
being withdrawn.
C.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
location:
Description:
Bellsouth Mobility
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
Nortech Warehouses, Inc.
1314 Neptune Drive
CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL - Request to construct a 125
foot high monopole communication tower and conversion of
approximately 360 square feet of an existing warehouse to an
equipment room.
i8
.:. it._
'<'1'1.
"
'i
./"].
. L'.
T1
U
'.~'~L' .'tl
"J/ _.
.,
i~'
. y,,,
~J
~.
~ .~
.". '.
"
.,
<~
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 13,1997
species of trees to be integrated throughout the site. The applicant can work out the placement of the
trees with staff.
In response to Chairman Wische, Mr. Drummond advised that these are low-income houses and the price
would range from $83,900 to $88,900.
Mr. Aguila suggested that Bahia sod not be used in the swale for the easement near the retention area
running north/south along the tracks because it will die from overwatering. He recommended the use of
St Augustine sod. Although Mr. Drummond did not anticipate a problem with Bahia, he agreed to use St
Augustine at the board's request
Motion
Mr. Aguila moved to approve the request for site plan approval for East Ridge PUD located at the
intersection of NE 4" Street and 20" Avenue, to install entry and peripheral landscaping and buffer walls
within the proposed 33 unit, single-family PUD development on 5.05 acres of land, subject to staff
comments and the following additional conditions:
1. That the Bahia sod indicated in the retention area is to be changed to St Augustine, and
that that area be properly irrigated;
2. That the trees along the railroad easement be staggered in triangular format to create a
better barrier between the railroad tracks and the homes; and
3. that we have a minimum of three (3) comparable tree species throughout the
development for variety to the landscaping plan of this development.
Mr. Rosenstock seconded the motion.
Assistant City Attomey Pawelczyk confirmed with Mr. Aguila that his motion includes the approval of the
three tree species by Kevin Hallahan.
The motion carried unanimously.
8. COMMENTS BY MEMBERS
..'^.......
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 13,1997
Development Board to determine the recipients of .the awards. ~owever, it also empowers the members
to withhold making any award unless there IS a project worthy of It
Motion
Mr. Rosenstock moved that the program presented by Jose Aguila be tabled ~t this time for consideration
at the next regular meeting of the Planning & Development Board.. While he highly recommends approval
of this program, approval is subject to comments at the next meeting. Mr. Friedland seconded the motion
that carried 7-0.
7. NEW BUSINESS:
A. SITE PLANS
New Site Plan
East Ridge PUD
John A. Grant, Jr., Inc.
DeGraf, Inc. Ih lh
100' northeast of the intersection of NE 4 Street and NE 20
Avenue
Request for site plan approval to install entry and peripheral
landscaping and buffer walls within the proposed 33 Unit, slngle-
family PUD development on 5.05 acres of land.
Chairman Wische advised the applicant that the members had revi7wed the back-up material assoc:iated
with this petition, and asked the applicant to discuss only conditions he did not agree With, or Items
requiring clarification.
Courtney Drummond. Realstered Professional Enaineer for John Grant Enaineerina. 333 North
Federal Hlahway. Boca Raton. Florida. was present on behalf of the applicant
1.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Assistant City Attorney Pawelczyk administered the oath.
h~~": ': "f~~-.
.,
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 13, 1997
;..
. v:'\
ij
Development Board to determine the recipients of the awards. However, it also empowers the members
to withhold making any award unless there is a project worthy of it.
Motion
Mr. Rosenstock moved that the program presented by Jose Aguila be tabled at this time for consideration
at the next regular meeting of the Planning & Development Board. While he highly recommends approval
of this program, approval is subject to comments at the next meeting. Mr. Friedland seconded the motion
that carried 7-0.
7. NEW BUSINESS:
A. SITE PLANS
New Site Plan
East Ridge PUD
John A Grant, Jr., Inc.
DeGraf, Inc.
100' northeast of the intersection of NE 4th Street and NE 20"
Avenue
Request for site plan approval to install entry and peripheral
landscaping and buffer walls within the proposed 33 unit. single-
family PUD development on 5.05 acres of land.
~ Chairman Wische advised the applicant that the members had reviewed the back-up material associated
(-.7 with this petition, and asked the applicant to discuss only conditions he did not agree with, or items
ii';. requiring clarification.
1.
Project:
Agent:
OWner:
Location:
Description:
Courtney Drummond. Registered Professional Engineer for John Grant Engineering, 333 North
Federal Hlahwav. Boca Raton. Florida. was present on behalf of the applicant.
Assistant City Attorney Pawelczyk administered the oath.
Mr. Drummond reported that East Ridge is a 33-unit PUD. The applicant had no Objections to any of the
comments raised by staff, and will make all necessary changes to reflect staffs comments.
Mr. Aguila said he was not able to determine the species of hedge material intended for the area along
the railroad tracks or on the perimeter. Mr. Drummond said it is Cocoplum and Red Cedar.
Mr. Aguila explained that although the applicant may be in compliance with the Code relative to the tree
line along the tracks. it would be aesthetically more pleasing and create a denser barrier that will deflect
some of the noise from the train if the trees were staggered in a triangular shape. Mr. Drummond
accepted this suggestion and agreed to make that change. He realized that he might have to add some
additional trees.
In response to Mr. Rosenstock, Ms. Heyden advised that a Red Cedar tree is very similar to a Juniper.
Mr. Rosenstock thought there was a variety of Juniper that is brown for more than six months each year.
It would be a mistake to plant this type of tree because they look dead most of the year. Ms. Heyden
advised that the Red Cedar tree remains green all year.
. ,. i
\.-. ..
'.
: i
Discussion ensued about the monotonous variety of trees selected for this development. The members
also felt the trees selected are too messy. Mr. Aguila recommended that the applicant select three
3
l'J
i ~
'-
~
J
" il
',I'
:r
.,.
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 13, 1997
species of trees to be integrated throughout the site. The applicant can work out the placement of the
trees with staff.
In response to Chairman Wische, Mr. Drummond advised that these are low-income houses and the price
would range from $83,900 to $88,900.
Mr. Aguila suggested that Bahia sod not be used in the swale for the easement near the retention area
running north/south along the tracks because it will die from overwatering. He recommended the use of
St. Augustine sod. Although Mr. Drummond did not anticipate a problem with Bahia, he agreed to use St.
Augustine at the board's request.
Motion
Mr. Aguila moved to approve the request for site plan approval for East Ridge PUD located at the
intersection of NE 4" Street and 20" Avenue, to install entry and peripheral landscaping and buffer walls
within the proposed 33 unit, single-family PUD development on 5.05 acres of land, subject to staff
comments and the following additional conditions:
1. That the Bahia sod indicated in the retention area is to be changed to St. Augustine, and
that that area be properly irrigated;
2. That the trees along the railroad easement be staggered in triangular format to create a
better barrier between the railroad tracks and the homes; and
3. that we have a minimum of three (3) comparable tree species throughout the
development for variety to the landscaping plan of this development.
Mr. Rosenstock seconded the motion.
Assistant City Attorney Pawelczyk confirmed with Mr. Aguila that his motion includes the approval of the
three tree species by Kevin Hallahan.
The motion carried unanimously.
8. COMMENTS BY MEMBERS
None
9. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Planning & Development Board, the meeting properly
adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
~'1n,p~
{}anet M. Prainito
Deputy City Clerk
(One Tape)
4