The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS 7.0.2 COMMERCE ROAD REAL TV NEW SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ - 00-137 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION May 11,2000 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Project Name: Commerce Road Realty Property Owner: James K. Clark/Timothy W. Swilley Applicant/Agent: Del Swilley, Inc. Location: Commerce Road, east of High Ridge Road (High Ridge Commerce Park PID, Lot 18) File No.: NWSP 00-002 Land Use Plan Designation: Industrial (I) Zoning Designation Planned Industrial Development (PID) Proposed use: Industrial/Office/Warehouse Number of Rental Bays: Six (6) Square Footage: Site Area: 55,080 square feet (1.266 acres) Building Area: Warehouse/storage - 17,822 square feet Office 4.494 square feet Total - 22,316 square feet Surrounding land uses and zoning district: (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map) North - Commerce Road, farther north Boynton Pump and Irrigation Co., zoned PID; South - Waste Management Inc., zoned Ml; Page 2 Memorandum #00-137 Existing Site Characteristics: Proposed Development: Concurrency: East - Undeveloped Lot 17 of the High Ridge Commerce Park PID; West - Approved project, Majestic Greeting Card, on Lots 19 and 20 zoned PID, farther west High Ridge Road R-Q-W The subject property is a vacant, 1.266 acre lot, overgrown with a variety of trees, mostly nuisance species of Australian Pine and Accacia, as well as a variety of weeds, grasses and shrubs. Florida Power and Light utility easements extend through the northern and southern property lines. The south side ofthe property is bordered by the abandoned Miner Road, now a 25-foot buffer, enacted through resolution R97-68. The developer is proposing construction of a 22,316 square foot industrial/office building with six (6) rental bays and related parking. The building's five bays will be limited to a one story-level; the sixth, a comer bay at the south side of the building, will have a second story storage space (see Exhibit "B" - Proposed Site Plan). Depending on the proposed uses, Environmental Review as well as Use Approval may be required for each occupant. a. Traffic - A traffic study for the project was provided as part of this submittal. However, the study assumes the total square footage ofthe project to be 20,380 square feet, without accounting for the 1,936 square feet second story storage space. Therefore, the study must be amended and re-submitted; prior to final approval, staff must receive confirmation from Palm Beach County's Traffic Division regarding standards compliance. b. Drainage - Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The City's concurrency ordinance requires drainage certification at time of site plan approval. The Engineering Division is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred to time of permit review, when more complete engineering documents are required. Driveways: Parking Facility: Proposed on-site traffic circulation consists of one (1) two-way, 25-foot wide entry drive aisle with access to Commerce Road. The proposed vehicular use area will provide parking areas containing the required 9-foot by I8-foot spaces (all at a 90 degree angle) and one (1) loading space. There are 37 parking spaces proposed, including two (2) designated as handicapped accessible. Required parking is calculated to be 37 spaces. The applicant has used warehouse use-based calculations for two largest rental bays, and alternative calculations - based on the minimum ofthe two (2) spaces per rental bay requirement - for the remaining four bays. Regulations Page 3 Memorandum #00-137 for the Planned Industrial Development zoning district determine that parking space requirements are based on number of employees on a maximum shift and projected number of visitors. However, since employee information is not available, staff allows the calculation of parking spaces based on square footage and use. Landscaping: The landscaping of the site will fully meet code requirements when staff comments are incorporated. Special attention shall be given to strict compliance with the master plan requirements for the 25 foot perimeter buffer. One (1) mahogany tree is required per 40 linear foot of frontage and a continuous eugenia hedge (maintained at 6 feet) along the outside edge of the buffer. Building and Site Regulations: Building and site regulations will fully meet code requirements when staff comments are incorporated into the permit drawings. Community Design Plan: The proposed warehouse/office building is a typical industrial structure similar to others developed in the High Ridge Commerce Park. Consistency with the surroundings is enhanced by the surface treatments and colors that match surrounding buildings. In particular, the green detailings match those of similar color for Boynton Pump and Irrigation Co., Morris and PGD buildings. Signage: No freestanding sign is proposed with this site submittal. When site signage is proposed, a separate submittal to the Planning and Zoning Division will be required. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Division recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the comments included in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) recommends that the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permit. xc: Central File J :\SHRDA T A\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Commerce Road Realty\Site plan staff report CRRealty.doc LOCATION MAP SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST HYPOLUXO ROAD 71 st STREET S. FINN HILL DR. TOMA TOE RD. I{) en 0 ~ < CEDAR RIDGE < 0 ~ Q:: VI Q:: W ~ ~ COMMERCE RD ~ < III III W 0:: (;) ~ (.) SITE COMMERCE WAY GATEWAY BLVD. EXHIBIT ~ OJ I- - CD - :I: X w S il I~.J ~h! fa gi ~~ t~ti .!J lis: !~ :.-Ifi" ~.i ;~!2 - h'" ~~! ~~"l'" j~ ,QV'~r ~ ~!~i ~ ~9f~ ,I -~~ 31.T ~ * ~n ~~ ~~~ ~r ..". c..,.,~ !!J '1::i !t:J' ~lt-= urC5 .,~.. ;;j< -~u '4l ~.J A K e- ~. i ."~.i'i~ ~;j till: ;;,i~:2,t~ .. 1.' ~~l. t "~. ; }.. ":2 ~J.'lT .:fGS" ~~~ Qlti~; tl!ll"..!1- ~ I'I~"'" lL.d ~ Do ~5.,g Q~iit:;'% .3 ~..f "a:,~" ~ ~11 ;!~lr . !!~ ~~t~ 0.9111 ~.!~Q _ 0 , p- ... 1;1012lQ1:1 < 1f:)V9& T"J.Q).rtJ,.S ~J'! ...--- ..." .--- ., 'IIa-'" ;r.o~ ""Ii ~..iI -,,-=, II. ."...,. . ~ ;...., l"'''',d ;U'S ..,rtX' J..;rr'ffMS '!lQ l/. '! ~~ .. rli ;;~ it~ ,u'" :(.. .~I 1y. ~~- ~c~ . . ~~, Vi14 a.. '.Ii; :.~ 1~i ~!~ ~S~ 1 . -. .?;' ;, ~ t~Z .~1 !6J ;~i 5~1 )o;1Wi ~~. ., ~"I ..l-~ i~c t";>~ r . g~J", ; 8 'I .. : l~~U i, It'' <t; " 'i!llt..~ ~~ Sl-i ~l ..., ~.1n~ !~ ,...11'-;1 ." !: ~" !If. ""i"-~E-"'~ J~g!~ : ~!~6~ .~ 10:!2r :i:f S~Hi ~~ ~ !;~iI It ~'i3~~ ;~ ...... .9, ~~1~~ i~ ~:t .Oc. J'I ~ca~~ ~~ 'J'e "Co , ~ai .:1 ~~ :II'''1,{' "'\~~ III 5t ~.>,:)rl~ =2 :(1l" r ~ lli';:i @.y Et:t~ lJ :zol: ~~ .~3 h ~'i'fi~ .:.~ ..~~i~ f\S 1~jCi! !~ i!~~~ ~~ ~ ~ .:, r ,WnlJ.J"Ct"=. 'l-W d'rfl~ ~~ ~...LJJ.r'WV' J j >.- 1 .. l' -' .. t , o ~ i ... I I i i I -011' -~ I ill :1 ' i I f i I 3 ~ ~ , . I I I I \ I r ~ -i ',-, i I -- " E .. ~ ~ ~ ~ I I . a l '- ,...~t~ .6S 'r.~'~ f~ < ~ 10 rr _ ,;: ~~, 1 ~- m1 * C; , !' . -~ :! ~ lif.~ i~~:1 ~ -;i r:;~ ~-: ~! ... !:~ ~" ~=~ ,~, '0' ~,~ ~';i i;: ~k <- ...- J ~ ! t- .~\i ~i~ ; I i +-~-: i \..i"M,11 ;1 1I,....;tO'J' "'"'? J ~02 5~-""'''' "') ~ ~ , ~ ~;i . . J "J'l 3Js: a ~.., ';1! ~-a Hi} ! f :1";- '" ill. " aU ... :~ :1'""1' 011 ::f. qH 1i :01(11 Hfi 'OJ f!" .:r ~ ~ ~ ! ~ I: ( 1 ~ ~ " ~ ~ y i oS f ! '1. '" .... L. I w' 1-' -, VI, .. ~ .. . ;:: ,~~....!.. 01( ~ s::=::I~ : ~"" ~~-1i LI 1L II- ;J 91e. ~ l!e ~ 3t: dl~ ~ u;j .;J :J 0'1 ~ 'C' J' ..' ::<j ... "2f. ~ .... :"i P if a. : .. \l ~ ~: H .. < . ~ ~. ..... ..... <t --L:l: .1 1'i ~~ ~ ~! . -~ .... .. ..- ..cs~ 1i~ ~!l. !I~ '.. ~ ~ '!" ,.5 .J~ ..~ i ~~ ~ ~ cii J a Uc Ilf; ~ .;!1!! J ;ti ~ ~~ Q I-~ ~ -<#,Co ol~ t- j-'ll. F.t'" ...: ~'t III tIo;,[\. t;'" D: .!i ~t.. ~~ .i.~ II.. ~f'I,?-: i] aC. oj .. ~~ ~\j,. \i''= ~b<i.' ~f ~z fa ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ...:. ...i.lII.,..... ~. ""'!~ N ~. :f. . ~ of ., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ i. !"~ :; j ~ .j 3;f J" ...J1S ~ f ~i~ ~ 1 " !,... -II -- .;; .... . .- ~- .' .' 'L- ,0 - \_ i~d l"l'l$.~" ' ~.~~' ~t" ~. ~~ '.1 #1' , .~3'~;t'1'1\tI'S ~ ~~-- ",.. .. ~ II " ~i. '1 -. ., -'" - \ \ \ '" ,j; \ \ \ z -io . ' \ ~ .. \!. \11 'Q . . ~ ~ .. ~, -t. f.s 'e t- " '0 ... .. ! J '0 ~.-; __ _ \lM-~. .,....<3'\',.... ,~'~~. '. ,\ ." ~ "'0\ If'l\ \t, \ ~ \\- \. ,.- \y \ \ \, 'Q -!- ~ .i \- ~\ " ~ \ ' . \ ~ . 1~~ \JV;': ~~ ~~~ :~i. \.. ~.s \\ \' \\\~: t. , '. -,;. \"', \ ,_ 1 . \'~\"" \-~ ' \~~~~;~;:, ~ "";\ \ ~, i t~ ..~ ...... '\ 'In 11:' o~. ~. ~e ' ~ I. I ;l -<t" .... (; ~ '~ ''!. -~ -0 / '" '0 .....-.~~~ '2~' . \-:' .01[ '\ t'!- ~~~ : ... ~.,~' \~ ~\\ ~".. ~__ k '1 ...~~--_. ,', ~ ~:t '; \ ? \ 1 ~ ~ l qj. > "r- ... -' ; , ~ ' ~~ ~~ ,," ,.. ~~ . . ~ "; , " 1- ~~ o. 'i~ ,~ !~ ~ . -, ., ~ 1 . ) "- .. 'i WI ~ " .' '. ~~ -, r " \ ! \~~ J t~ ~~:; t ~ 7,' ,~ l.r- r t <:I a " J " -, .'. \ ..........- \ '-,.'" ~~~~\~ \ ~~~'::1'i~r;,- \ ~,,!",r: -- - --.;~ \1 \ -:-.:. ~,~~~\:.:r: \f\~-S~S\~~ 1M ., "f. ':;. '" ':' ~ 'l<\~ ~'\'." '.~ ~J'~';~ ~~\\~;, ~ i\~H,H\'~ -; ,:;\~~~.,,2.2.""'\g \L.... co ~. \P">>~ -- \ ~\.. . .... .. "\tP -------.------------------------- - - o - 1: >< UJ ~. ~l II II 1- \ ~~ 1 1'1 }ll J~ ~Q ~ ~. ., ~\~ "~~; all tilt ~:; &t ~1 ~ i tl '" ~ noli. ~~,i ~~l '" .t!-~~ -~)-..: ~ !L3~ k l,r\. ;::'l:': " ~l i .. l t \ l:l ~ 3 2 .. l!! 'S: 1 ! ; ~ i. '1 " t '" ~ ~, i ! \! J .,.. 3 ! ~ ~ t~ 't ! ~ ~ ~ !ii3 ~ J ... 0: W1il.t-"!,.#~ .....-... - ------ . ~ ~JA ._JIG ~~q 11 'I. ) t:I:J.~"""'" ~'r~r~ r- ~ ~ Jc 1 \ '.... !t 1 ~ -~ :0 .t '" I :; ~ \l" -~ { ~ B' \\ ... i l~ t: \ -< t ~ $ ! ~ iil, t J ~ \ ~ '!' ...... N t t \!'" '" ... "I ~ (} to- n .: ~ ~ I- J <l' <:) ... " i .;. . I ~ l i i~ t g i .i .. \ · ;. .. ~ ~ h~ ~~, ::.- ..I 1 TI~ i. ~ ~ li-"& tiJ~f i. t 1 ~ \ 1 ! i ' '\ '0' o. T ~ . . !!: ~ ~ i~ \ 1 i \ \ ii, \i . , ,i ',~ U (~ ~ ~; ~ ~ i:.. ~\ 10 e ~.~1 \~tiillt \ ~ H H ~,~ q I \ld\ llt!lltl} 1 HtHi\~I\Jl~lb!~\\' . . G ceo, e Q \ CO ;-<l""i uhh it U I 11 :It ~~ i\ 4 ~ ii \1 1 l i }~ ~.. 1'" ~ 1 ~~ ii Ii tl .. Ii .. i ~ ~~! t' \ J i~!111 it-t ~t.i ,.,.. III trf! : i!i ii:IU~Ut I! \i"H"'~ 1I r l " - <: _ J ! ;-~ \ i i " ., .,) ~ III 'r ~ 8 ,,-.--" ,------"---'" -_.-~--~ -,--" EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Approval Project name: Commerce Road Realty File number: NWSP 00-002 Reference: 2nd review plans consists of 12 sheets identified as New Site Plan. File # NWSP 00-002 with a Mav 9.2000 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: 1. Relocate dumpster. Current location does not allow sanitation truck to exit properly. UTILITIES Comments: 2. All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 3. Dept. of Health permits will be required for the water system serving this project. (Sec.26-12). 4. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR Chap. 6, Art.IV, Sec.16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16( a)). Please submit these calculations with your Health Department permit submittal. 5. Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be $790.02 based upon a I inch meter. 6. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 7. LDR Chap. 6, Article IV, See 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Based upon the hydrant shown, the plan does not appear to meet this criterion. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. Page 2 Commerce Road Realty NWSP 00-002 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 8. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) 9. The water main to the fire hydrant appears to conflict with dumpster enclosure. Please relocate the enclosure. Note that a 16-inch water main exists in an easement on the south side of the property. 10. Please show the existing FPL Utility easement on all plan sheets FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: 11. Illumination concerns for both the rear elevation and north wall. No lighting fixtures are shown on the plans. Provide lighting fixtures in these areas. Indicate location, type and intensity of the lighting. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: NONE BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 12. At time of permit review, indicate on Site plan drawing the length of the handicap landing off each ramp. 13. At time of permit review, identify the finish floor elevation that the design professional established on the floor plan drawing. 14. At time of permit review, show entire area of second floor storage. 15. At time of permit review, submit Unity of Title, including all abandonments. 16. Compliance with the Building Codes will be evaluated at time of permit reVIew. The permit fee, water and sewer facility fees, Fire and Life Safety fees, County fees and State fees will be determined at time of permit review. 17. Permits are required to construct the improvements that are shown on the approved site plan/conditional use documents. Permit application forms are available in the Building Division of the Development Department. A permit submittal checklist is available on the Building Division. The list identifies the basic documents that the Permit Application Technician checks for when an applicant submits for permit review. Page 3 Commerce Road Realty NWSP 00-002 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE FORESTERJENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: NONE PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 18. On the site plan, correct surrounding zoning & provide land uses for the adjacent properties in order to determine correct greenbelt and vegetative screening application. 19. On the site plan, label and dimension all easements and required landscape buffers. Ch. 4, Sec. 7, Par. B. 20. Project is proposed/designed with uses minimal parking spaces. Future intensification of project by proposing addition of industrial uses will require prior confirmation of parking capacity. 21. On the landscape plan, locate & label fire hydrants, and any utilities that may conflict with tree locations. 22. On the landscape plan, locate & label the 25 -foot wide greenbelt easement as well as the 10' utility easement along the south property line. Relocate the five (5) canopy trees out of the utility easement, and leave the hedge along the property line to match with established green belt planting scheme. The master plan requirement is to provide one (1) mahogany tree per 40 linear foot of frontage and a continuous eugenia hedge (maintained at 6 feet) along the outside edge of the buffer. 23. In the landscape plan plant list, provide for 50% native shrub materials, not including the 288 liriope in the calculations. 24. Amend the traffic study to include 1,936 square feet of the second story storage space. Prior to final approval the study must be re-submitted to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for confirmation of standards compliance. ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 25. To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Page 4 Commerce Road Realty NWSP 00-002 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 26. To be determined. J:\SHRDAT AlPlanningISHARED\\\'PIPROJECTS\Commerce Road Realty\IST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc DEVELOPIV" -~. 0RDER OF THE CITY COMMIf'-' ] OF THE l,. (Y OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIa...A PROJECT NAME: Commerce Road Realty APPLICANT'S AGENT: Del Swilley APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 2559 Webb Avenue, Unit 1, Delray Beach Florida 33444 DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: June 6,2000 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: New Site Plan LOCATION OF PROPERTY: High Ridge Commerce Park DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO. THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows: OR THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant HAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included". 4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby _ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other DATED: City Clerk IICHIMAINISHRDATAIPlanninglSHAREDlWPIPROJECTSICommerce Road RealtylCommerce Road Develop,Order,doc ~I'l i OF BOYNTON BEACH, FL01"-.a.Vn. INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Michael W. Rumpf DATE: Dir. of Planning & Zoning 04/26/00 FILE: NWSP-00-002 FROM: Off. Louis J. Zeitinger Off. John Huntington Police Department Crime Prevention Unit SUBJECT: Commerce Road Realty Co., L.L.C. REFERENCES: Provided Plans ENCLOSURES: I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comment: 1. Illumination concerns for both the rear elevation and north wall. a. No lamp fixtures indicated in the building plans for either wall. hre MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 7ffil . i ! i -..' ;1 TO: Diane Reese, Finance Director <J f fi---'; I FROM:/Z- John A. Guidry, Utilities Director j DATE: ~'b.v /3, Zh<> . -. ..... '--'''",,- SUBJECT: Reservation fee transmittal fO~ (tflul- ~~:!) Enclosed is a reservation fee for the subject projeet:---- Amount- $17t1.~z Check no. - 310 From- ~hn,,~.,~~i##I'i1$471d Please deposit this fee in the appropriate account. You may refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella of this office. JAG/PVM' bc: Peter Mazzella xc: Michael Rumpf, Planning Director File DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 00-216 TO: Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal Larry Quinn, Public Works Mike Haag, Building Division Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist H. David Kelley Jr., Utilities Department John Huntington, Police Department Louie Zeitinger, Police Department Barbara Meacham, Parks Division H. David Kelley Jr., Engineering Department Lusia Galav, Planning Department Michael W. Rub, of Planning and Zoning July 24, 2000 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Rectified Plans for -Commerce Road Realty (NWSP 00-002) The amended plans for Commerce Road Realty site plan modifications have been submitted for final sign-off by the Technical Review Committee. Four (4) sets of plans, each requiring your unconditional signature, are available for review in Planning and Zoning. A copy of the originally reviewed plans, staff comments and development order are available for your use to perform the review. Please review and sign-off each of the four- (4) sets of plans, NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., August 7,2000. If the plans are not in compliance with your staff comments or City regulations, do not sign the plans but only indicate the memorandum number where your comments are documented. To facilitate the sign-off process, please resubmit written comments addressed to the Planning and Zoning Director, NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., August 7,2000. Thank you for your prompt response to this request. MWRblw cc: Steve Gale, Deputy Fire Chief Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director John Wildner, Parks Department J:\SHRDATAIPlannlng\SHAREDlWP\PROJECTS\Commerce Road RealtylReClified Memo to TRC members,doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #00-051 TO: Mike Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning VIA: Christine Roberts, Interim Public Works Director FROM: Mark A. Lips, Forman III DATE: March 28, 2000 SUBJECT: 1 st Review - Project - Location - Agent - File No. - New Site Plan Commerce Road Realty High Ridge Commerce Park Del Swilley NWSP 00-002 The Public Works Department has no comments or objections to this project going forward. If you have any questions please contact me at (561) 742-6200. -If! a ~ - MUpl Attachment r,fnl D rm jg~!l[Ji7. m ,. ,r;.-,' i I f n 1J - --., " " III I MAR 2 8 " ~;:: ' L-___ PL.-'; ;,jiNf"..:- ~-,-,~. luNING '[]fpH_,'lLl L, -...J MIit.ttiIa'!1DoriS ' "'" ", i, " From: Mazzella, Pete Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 2:24 PM To: Rumpf, Michael; Marttila, Doris Cc: Guidry, John Subject: Commerce Road realty J Here are my comments. Hard copy to follow. (Note the discrepancy between the plans and survey in specific condition 6. Has the right-of-way and easements been abandoned across this lot? Pete ~ I \:~moo ~.. ." DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 00-087 TO: Michael Rumpf, Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag, Building Code Administrator DATE: March 27,2000 RE: Commerce Road Realty - New Site Plan (NWSP 99-002) 1st review comments We have reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. The applicant must acknowledge and address the below listed comments before the project is presented to the Board for their reVIew. Buildin!! Division (Permit & Site Specific Comments) - Michael E. Haag (561) 742-6352 1. Add to the building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door to each tenant space. Show and label the same doors on the drawing titled general floor plan building elevations. 2. Change the title Building Gross Area to Building Footprint Gross Area. Add to the drawing the total gross floor area of the building including the proposed 2nd floor area. 3. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel of the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each tenant space. The symbol shall start at the accessible parking space(s) and terminate at the accessible entrances to the building. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width ofthe accessible route (Note: The minimum width required by the code is forty-four (44) inches). Add text that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with Section 4.3 (Accessible Route) and 4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones) of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings that are required to be installed along the path. Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. Building Division Memo No. 00-087 to Michael Rumpf RE: Commerce Road Realty - New Site Plan - 1 st review com March 27, 2000 Page Two 4. Within the site data found on sheet 10f2, identify the proposed finish floor v~ion proposed building (lowest floor elevation). Verify that the proposed elevation 1 . compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data the following issues: a) The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data: "The proposed floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 1 DO-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the South Florida Water Management District's surface water management construction development regulations." [Section 3107.1.2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edition of the Standard Building Code] b) From the FIRM map, identify within the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. c) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the site plan, floor plan and civil plan. 5. On the drawing titled site plan, identify the symbol that represents the property line. 6. Add to the drawing titled site plan all of the easements that are shown on the survey. The location, type and size of the easement(s) shall be shown and identified on the site plan. Where applicable, amend the plans so that structures do not encroach into an easement. 7. Add to the site data the number of stories in the building. Also, indicate the overall height of the building (finish grade to the highest point ofthe roof or parapet wall). The overall height of the building shall not exceed the height limitations of the Zoning Code. Dimension the overall height of the building on the elevation view drawings of the building. 8. Below the drawing titled Building General Floor Plan found on sheet 2 of 2, add text that would indicate that the room layout that is shown on the drawing is conceptual. 9. At time of 2nd review, submit a copy of the recorded resolution that verifies the abandonment ofthe Miner Road right-of-way and both easements located at the south end of the property. MEH:bg J:\SHRDATA\Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 00-002 1st review Commerce Road Realty,doc DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 00-059 ~ ~ @ ~ u il~ ~AALl >oj 1 TO: Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning FROM: John A. Guidry, Interim Director of Engineering ~.,.~,,'., PLANNING AND - W' ZONING OEPT. DATE: March 23, 2000 RE: COMMERCE ROAD REALTY (NWSP 00-002) NEW SITE PLAN 1sT REVIEW 1. On the Site Plan add a general note that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies, such as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, L WDD, DEP and any others, shall be included with the permit request. 2. If the existing sidewalk within Commerce Drive right-of-way is four feet wide, change dimension on plan 3. Add note to Paving Plan that all striping, markings and signage shall conform to City Standard Drawing B-98001 and modify the "parking stall detail" accordingly. 4. On the Site Plan show the stop sign and stop bar at the exit. Also, on the Site & Civil Plans show 25' double yellow lane separation stripes at the entrance. JAG:HDK:KRH/ck C:\My Documents\Commerce Road Realty New Site Plan 1st Rev..doc MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 00 - 77 .-;;-';~~~"\:" ~-:: \\ 1.1 \.,~. . (,;\ \';1 \, \." .ft"""~-' ':J . I) ~ \5__~~"'~"- , \~r- \& ",,0' \\,;, \\ ~~- t TO: Mike Rumpf, Planning Director John A. Guidry, Utilities Director)V March 28, 2000 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Commerce Road Realty We offer the following comments on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Dept. of Health permits will be required for the water system serving this project. (Sec. 26-12). 3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your Health Department permit submittal. 4) Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be $790.02 based upon a I-inch meter. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 2) LDR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Based upon the hydrant shown, the plan does not appear to meet this criterion. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 3) A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) 4) The waste stream from the manufacturing process must meet the City's pretreatment requirements. A sampling point must be provided to allow monitoring of this waste stream. (Sec. 26-143, 26-147) 5) The water main to the fire hydrant appears to conflict with the dumpster enclosure. Please relocate the enclosure. Note that a 16-inch water main exists in an easement on the south side of the property . 6) The survey depicts Miner Road as a right-of-way, yet the plan dimension indicates the building will encroach into that right-of-way, and over a utility easement. This issue must be reconciled before review can continue. Please also show all existing and proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The proposed easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code. Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (742-6404) of this office. JAG/PVM Xc: Skip Milor Peter Mazzella File Galav Lusia From: Sent: To: Subject: Rumpf, Michael Wednesday, March 29, 2000 10:57 AM Galav Lusia Congr-&i8 Road Realty project ~1?1QL.eL Just a reminder that we need to keep on this one to see if we can make up for some of the lost time. I noticed that some comments have come in. If you haven't already, let's send oft the comments as we receive them to get them started with plan modifications. Also let's try to include notes to them in our transmittal that explains why they are receiving them incrementally and as a part of our attempt to give them extra attention. Thanks for helping me hand-hold this one. MR. 1 To: Planning and Zoning From: Officer R.G.Riggle 033000 ~ 'I ~t:4. *' ..'\,. ~~ ~ '0'-:;>,.. The police department has no comments in reference to the purposed a Reality. {(oJ;2:,.., ~ . o ,Jl... f i ~ ! t ~- " ~J' t" MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 00 - TO: Mike Rumpf, Planning Director FROM: John A. Guidry, Utilities Director DATE: March 28, 2000 SUBJECT: Commerce Road Realty We offer the following comments on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2) Dept. of Health permits will be required for the water system serving this project. (Sec. 26-12). 3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your Health Department permit submittal. 4) Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be $790.02 based upon a I-inch meter. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 2) LDR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Based upon the hydrant shown, the plan does not appear to meet this criterion. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 3) A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) 4) The waste stream from the manufacturing process must meet the City's pretreatment requirements. A sampling point must be provided to allow monitoring of this waste stream. (Sec. 26-143, 26-147) 5) The water main to the fire hydrant appears to conflict with the dumpster enclosure. Please relocate the enclosure. Note that a 16-inch water main exists in an easement on the south side of the property. 6) The survey depicts Miner Road as a right-of-way, yet the plan dimension indicates the building will encroach into that right-of-way, and over a utility easement. This issue must be reconciled before review can continue. Please also show all existing and proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The proposed easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code. Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (742-6404) of this office. JAG/PVM Xc: Skip Milor Peter Mazzella File S:\PLANNINGlSHAREDlWP\PROJECTS\COMMERCE ROAD REAL TYlUTILlTIES - 1 ST REVIEW DOC FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION Memorandum No. 2000-38 @,~~ . . - " , , ' NFPA Life Safety Code 101, National Fire Code 1, all applicable National Fire Protection Association codes, and the City Fire code shall be adhered to. DATE: Mike Rumpf, Director Planning & Zoning Steve Gale A.? / Fire Marshal '? () March 27, 2000 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: NWSP 00-002 Commerce Road Realty High Ridge Commerce Park A fire flow test is required. LDR 6-16. Hydrant and access road shall be in place prior to above grade construction. NFPA 1. A turnaround is required at the south end of the parking lot with a 45' turning radius. BBCC 9-3. Vehicle parking may not be within 5 feet of the hydrant in any direction with a clear 5' corridor to the roadway. BBCC 9-23. Location of Fire Department sprinkler connection not shown so unable to determine acceptable position in relation to building and hydrant. BBCC 9-6. cc: File "I;,i. .:.. 7 i ~ l:O,a. .........,....-.,,_...._ ....~ ~ _ ._. ~.- -~:Z~:tS:hjl~2t:=~~~, DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 00-059 TO: Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning and ZOning~/ John A. Guidry, Interim Director of Engineering ~ March 23,2000 FROM: DATE: RE: COMMERCE ROAD REALTY (NWSP 00-002) NEW SITE PLAN 1sT REVIEW 1. On the Site Plan add a general note that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies, such as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, L WOD, DEP and any others, shall be included with the permit request. 2. Ifthe existing sidewalk within Commerce Drive right-of-way is four feet wide, change dimension on plan .. 3. Add note to Paving Plan that all striping, markings and signage shall conform to City Standard Drawing B-98001 and modify the "parking stall detail" accordingly. 4. On the Site Plan show the stop sign and stop bar at the exit. Also, on the Site & Civil Plans show 25' double yellow lane separation stripes at the entrance. ~' JAG:HDK:KRH/ck C:\My Documents\Commerce Road Realty New Site Plan 1st Rev..doc DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 00-087 ;f~ rT (e') '..' . . I ' 1,1 D rS-",: -", : q , 1! ~ 1'1 "I": ? IULll MAR.- 9 L,~,-.-, DATE: Michael Rumpf, Planning and Zoning Director ~ Michael E. Haag, Building Code Administrato~.? kP March 27, 2000 D TO: FROM: RE: Commerce Road Realty - New Site Plan (NWSP 99-002) 1st review comments We have reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. The applicant must acknowledge and address the below listed comments before the project is presented to the Board for their reVIew. Buildin~ Division (Permit & Site Specific Comments) - Michael E. Haag (561) 742-6352 1. Add to the building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door to each tenant space. Show and label the same doors on the drawing titled general floor plan building elevations. 2. Change the title Building Gross Area to Building Footprint Gross Area. Add to the drawing the total gross floor area of the building including the proposed 2nd floor area. 3. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel of the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each tenant space. The symbol shall start at the accessible parking space(s) and terminate at the accessible entrances to the building. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width ofthe accessible route (Note: The minimum width required by the code is forty-four (44) inches). Add text that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with Section 4.3 (Accessible Route) and 4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones) of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings that are required to be installed along the path. Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. Building Division Memo No. 00-087 to Michael Rumpf RE: Commerce Road Realty - New Site Plan - 1 st review comments March 27, 2000 Page Two 4. Within the site data found on sheet 1 of 2, identify the proposed finish floor elevation of the proposed building (lowest floor elevation). Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations ofthe code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: a) The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data: "The proposed floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 1 OO-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the South Florida Water Management District's surface water management construction development regulations." [Section 3107.1.2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edition of the Standard Building Code] b) From the FIRM map, identify within the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. c) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the site plan, floor plan and civil plan. 5. On the drawing titled site plan, identify the symbol that represents the property line. 6. Add to the drawing titled site plan all of the easements that are shown on the survey. The location, type and size of the easement(s) shall be shown and identified on the site plan. Where applicable, amend the plans so that structures do not encroach into an easement. 7. Add to the site data the number of stories in the building. Also, indicate the overall height of the building (finish grade to the highest point of the roof or parapet wall). The overall height of the building shall not exceed the height limitations of the Zoning Code. Dimension the overall height of the building on the elevation view drawings ofthe building. 8. Below the drawing titled Building General Floor Plan found on sheet 2 of2, add text that would indicate that the room layout that is shown on the drawing is conceptual. 9. At time of 2nd review, submit a copy of the recorded resolution that verifies the abandonment of the Miner Road right-of-way and both easements located at the south end of the property. MEH:bg J:\SHRDATA\Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 00-002 1st review Commerce Road Realty.doc Wildner, John From: Sent: To: Subject: Wildner, John Thursday, March 23, 20004:02 PM Lewis, Nicole Commerce Road Realty Parks Division has reviewed the above referenced plans. We have no comments at the present time, 1 MAR27;~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. . \..o~-' J Parks / Plannin~ Division Memorandum- TRC ~\~~": :~UJrn' ~- Subject: Mike Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning Kevin 1. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist t<- ~ ~ Commerce Road Realty New Site Plan- First Review - To: From: Date: March 24, 2000 I have no comment on the above project. The project should continue in the normal review process. Kjh File /J. ,;/' f? ;:;..- ,.J ,~' CLift ',1, f r"ot-f..,J f- (.> FL j f ) ~ ~Vlf'lJ eOM f.'t r-IJIS I\j I,A, 00- 00 z. ~!zz.. A- /, >> (.i V ' V)::.~ /f S&t:...t:-v cSC.V:'VE?( 0CT OLPC.::r(.... r-f,.9JJ S;x t ,1,. t ~. 'J ( /v' \...,'-' , IJ ," .?,,+ ' I ~ I,.;\:-J ,.. j\._~ f>;'C"__ A-r>Jf;u LJ'J STfl 6E'S. ,14tL,;,tS P,V,) D2 I 'vf1.,.JA 1 So J C fl. c(('~c. 7 PM. A 1\''-'/0 r.... '- C G I' ,,".,' -, ,,, " i ' ,,- ('f" 1',1') . .......v., _.J . - \..... j Tc-t".l ~ y<>r, ~ LIS ;;-c D , "':' ;..., ',1 -,~ CI~ <-:>, ,<~,. 1\J . J J '- ~.: .... ~ ~ .,..../ t h~.',\,~"'C'- ~Tft ) \/,L<..",",U) t' ThE' (~, ;"v..~...._I'.....}U '. 1,<". ,., ' 'v \ ~t;' --;.....1t-t l turJ , L-/f,( 5~.) 1111<, B f-' e ~. R-U!(.. Dt"jL7 H-e\\.,jlfr \~ Fu:r b, /?UIL?("-ib Sc;Ti;ttc.~ iVfO''f'.-',-;:''''-'()t.,) c,. P :)'L D').)\:Pr :j~ '&-s d. ?(Qf'c~E'\) 'vr,;r: ,u~ CI";LC\jl..:~TIWS e, '2.0!..JI!VU E DC"~Il"J..);tl:F.t Uh.Jt> u~t 2 .> , o ,'-.J --- - ~--~... 5 ,.....,c:= G ' . : I... r L- -/",..t...J ? ' . ' ~ ,:;"! -: ,jli.CJ€-- ~\J) \~.,,-~~~._~j}.~'(...J -Z.Qr-.;ij\...~"" .; ltiJ.l0 '. ~ ,r_",- ;,.... I' ~ Fui'... ~T-'~-f S .., .;,.." "'i-f,' rj",)..e.-,,';-,~c.. .~ I . -...! _......... -;: , ""f \.",01_'-- " __ .,; I :; ;'-:l c' (-:. TJ pc. -t.:;,. -r"- i ,.) ':' Co, ,:-::G.: ::':""'lleelv'l~CLT 1+,"-i~vt:GC',:'; ".1-:'- SLrl.C(t..l!\JG l-fy,:JLtc..'t j;QAJ, t1, I2Gv I sc:' 1I+t1 .srn; PLA 0 Lr-\,\ \JuT So 7fiR T' T rte- /<.-i\ r"t ,;,j y(;.. \ \16-' r, IS u;~ A DJr\c[.'.JT T~) r~:~f~VPi':"'\.i'~t;;t,.... tf-i'.\cuJ0 ~~fTL::s--01 vJ ILL. ttA.JG-' A t/' j;J IM\J"'" uJ lJ)77f- C~ 1,,-1 F~'eT", C(T~ I>r2,"'j<-"")0# r?-'1C:;Oi~ t;, o IV T'~' C, .:; J IC' fcA- t.J ) ( \.... .l :~ \.,.. ~c~.. t<7 'i 'J"' ?,~, ", I iT\.- ,{_ v,.. (~.:./.; ..... f L.u c...' ':! C ,.J op ??t-'"JEc; ~)\I,...:.."-.: ..' 0 [<- , r C, H'. If cc,.. ~ 7 ,.....~c.,f . D' (i? t'." rH..., , 'I '- G 'PI' Q v i .:.c. f'r 1'-, ,,". Ct--.J ~'-, :~-,; ;' ',r'\ \..,) <s 'T 1 ~'I,.j \.:> (l-\--A"\ AL \.... J (j:):;:--:;) L-!.K0,\",r'i)-' f./' Js;- L.;" "'<..( t2: -Eu h2.(j''^ VI ew frT ~ yYltl'-l, t>i c,,\f~r-X(5- br bVO t:~F- . .... ~, ; ('.' Cr ......ff. . '?t6, \ \ f',l;\- K 15 ~ 7 ().L , r C r tV, ..... T.fft ~i it- Pc \A t ) (,') ..j c.'J ~ t . S (.) T'- (' ,- ,\jC CVfr'L ,I ::.~r+D Pv.... ~ :-;; c..E: H : '''"' I-:- ?) \) 0C-- !20A-D. Ctf. CI Ser:... 'I Prff?-."J 8. pC/;~i0 Tt+e 5IT(, fL..A-N Ll+riJT "':".:.'."lrj7- THe <;G<.,)'Trtcrl.,J.J eND of Tt-r~ ?,-.I" \(.. I 0(...:;; A;~(~ M :Dec''::, ,J,..;o'! (lJC. (' C(\(:. 4 f"i-<;E"'" 1070 Tift' 7,&; foo'"!" P;-I'<-';"'\lTt'{\.. i3UR-&-j2... I fSr,--'rHCr'2t)v 6P(f/,.2CLT. C ,it. '2.- >e~. 7 P,4I"2-, t+ i ) 7 q. ,.r",'" ,,< c...\~!', ?i.,\i) LA.;<C.-L A''''- ""'",,-~~., '<:::'\"<1 j"','" e.a..t':J:...,1{:,iJ'T,' ~ '-'~ I.' \"".; -':._ \ \-A.;f" J 1 : ~ _ ,,1'-l~ V. Z . ",,,,,,, '4 \J~ _ __ jY _..... ,- ... _ f'pJ;.; 12-~a'-.))(? G ~ lA~J';;S:""I"?C P:. ,-,f~ S [U;:). eft, '" Sf?C-. '7 /'19~, B /"0. f?ev'':e Jtj~- :17- PLt+V lottYUiJl 10 ,>JcevDf TUf::iJ ~V'~ tSPfK.€" AT Ti+[ 7"[(1_",",1; )Jc..)'S oF' I+~ f1;"Cj(;, "..J(.? A~t""A, Iff I"S S( {tcC 5r+A-u..,. Aca,'......r,.' c.t),-'f re 11'1\1<( T~~lict- E::t'i'Ly'. ( ',1.10 THe- f-H..\LIT\ (e..'4',) FllLt ,) ""T;:".,.;t-t (2.f........O,JrL) eTC..) 3, II. OJ-! TIff.' hri-U-!I rc=(T;.Jflf--C fLt:=",4T'uA,) PLr.q,.j) f4-6//IJJe- A ." Pt-"Tff 1<- r Trfc- DU^-Af S[G'fL tr"J( (c :'.I{2.p~ (NC t.. UDIIVJ Cd(Oit~\ , - J ... fI,-/;+ Tt-rL-lll'- ~ A ,d;) 1'10'.''.6' N:::-' ijUS,. Ct!. c:r Sc:c. 10 e:,+" ~,5 ('2-. SO?fJI q- A- COU(;. (2.CNOErLC'v e(:~V(IT'I()v C:J2,-if/1IG IAJc.LU;)'1)9 ", A\..L E\i\..0"J\..J E'i...C"A~\o.J6 rt-Jt? -rHt-/(L r:"')fC~f'D (](;U~. eft: d <;;.~, 7 e..~~. p. '2- I~. 0)..) THt- If/L((+/Tfc.r...,i:..rL- C;:U..'d/,: ";.\j Pu:.iJ) e....evl<(c- we oJt3-rL!fHl..- ... 'I~V \ L.J) f ",'-", /tt! 0 HT diN Ti.f(; ff:O#.Jr /1 iv j;> /~..6-I7-iL Gt {-vt9-r:,v ~ J;j ... {'/!/r Tel-!" TH-e' L.ffr tlv'.vv-.;.H L 6'lt5v;l1!c"-,) ) 0(2.- .:r:=F t-J0"t""" "2,..() Fet5r' .., ~Jf3'r'- H \.\.., (*\01+'1 ?rco.... \ O~ "Tl1.f=- CO{'ALf-Ci BUlLD,J.J\..::J (ft 10tfi -r 0 TH.e- ThP of 'r 11 e- BJ ( L t), Iv "=' f?-o:.:f- 1fqr0t ~ . /t.! Ct-J T:-i:C- Lf.,'-j-0s.(,-i.<~ ?L\~'J..,J I r(t!)';.~fi' Tftt' fiHl()vj,I...JI..) kJCTf'5' elf d Gte..? Pr'fL-. C a. /(2.p...i cA.-To...) .~t;J(..c't"'''' (.;Jff...f." (Cr+A,..,:ct:. ~CrE: -:il''Z.. ') b, r...~ j L .;.... cr--i~C"L Iff..} Aj CL/i'!2../J < <;'r.-f: '_,- (1;1;'" 0<:;~ ( ;.t;;. O~ -!;~'( {,;04vO'.o(,i,;t..., t?LAl--J [()(ftme.'LftiJ6L frl'-L"" u;;'fv:'......r7'r"., A>...ND A.!'v\ ... \<)' ,..,.!...-i""~ "'lv', '" \ , -, I - to. L .. A..... ~ - A ' ('...' I .:: I ......, \ I _. . v I [.... 11... oJ 'Tr.t I. 1-" '1 ....".. IV t -! 1::, ~"!'i '-''' ,:. r:... L 1$ ,1+ -,~'t,. f, IL, l\("........r..... I..i " 'V.....~f if I~, l2Gv'\~E'~ Tt-fG- Lff).W~';.r$6' "?L~t-J Ie fV'ATC:* nt6- S!~ 'Plfi1\J ... 5 ;'-ns.. F\.t<\-.j Si1'~~< ?::.7 C:';'ff"7Cf-:c; A;-.l:'; /v'iJsr P.& i2-2\1\~E~ 10 72&IA\N 7'1-It '25' FO~i 612(6,..) ~",E-Lr. /7. otJ THE' lv'l,'J,i" (.b-'E ?LftkJj ~'~~'J ':o( /i+e-:- ltrl....,J'" S!;{6< 'at) fC)/1; , tHe 2S'" fUJT" rti:,,~-"'rT!j.:, 6fL6C:~LtLT It) I.;.JCL-UC'C-' - C (' . I H1-' I (} t ev-l ' 1--1'--.> ~ 8. TPetS - .$:.....!CTCc.-iA t.lA,l-ffY\..;c,',il ) N\.-t\1aur.U'J b ff61/GC- - E VGE1- ,1'=+- UN'I ~lC;d-it ) '5 \.;{L_I tJ.4- M Cr:-E;:'.,1. '1 (sov'i"tf Hbc('€CNI..~: I ~. 0;.../ Tl~ ,.:,' I 11 i :, \ :;.. 1,/" PI o,U lCJr-'-'Y:~:;'" <: / ~ f'-P. {, ~ _ \.,. ....",v-...~"tl"- L.,..- ~ _ \....- 1...... '? oIiIoioo- 1.......-_..., 111l..J '2-6 FocT" WIDE- {., (?.tE,1'vLE"\.:r- EPr~t.--t AI\" ,q 6 uE(L-- It- 5 -,-rtt- ! () ( un (.I ry ~-t': E- t.M. G-tv' J A L-c, A.J G i7-t-r- &.u T7-f f(2 OffrL. T 7 u,.J(& . ~E:-lOCA Tt'" 17-16 5' c..1I).kP~) T1t.f(;s OtlT of we () n L Of f3;7-S.~tv't;:.^J/-, I+tJ D t.. t:-i'ruE-' T1-f f HG~ Pc.c..JG -rHt" P<2<f ~ {("j'1 (j v {- 7?J f1-1 rl Ie. H- (..U I r H f" f, 1'1"'1-03 l J<; rr~ D (; {2.f&t.J E cL T PCA ~TJ v ~ Sc l+6 ~ &- .. Iq. }0 TIf13 ( rt )J.:J S ( ite f P CNtV -r;f,;\. r-:-'" lISt r _~ . )--I \ ' , :rri.. U v' De --- S'? HI-. () IQ NATIve- ~H(UJ8 M~~jt7t..6). !JeT bJCLVUltJl: -rflt' c9:8B U{lJOr~ llV rttfr Cftl..c..uL,4Tl~N~. ~a. ON Tr~ t-,.JG.JJ~\'''\Jji,;, rtf'L0 SHeeT 30F <.0 ) Di.'A E-'I;S(,~w Tfr(r H-AJu\(A~?e.~PA'v ~\NV SIG~ ) P~l""l, G~(:.'1?. G-c:r TH-G-- f'{-i'\~~llJ0 STt"'-'-''- t(=1i}.J\ ST~-irE. r: )IJ\~, 00. i'.'O"~\tO}J... e-n"l Dl"<-A-\,rJ,.vl..::> it g-qt;OI'Z- DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 00-077 TO: TRC MEMBERS Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Mike Lane, Police Department Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department Michael Haag, Building Division Lusia Galav, Planning Division Larry Quinn, Public Works Department John Wildner, Parks Division Frantz LaFontant, Engineering Department David Kelley, Engineering Department m. Michael W. Rumpf . ;yv Director of Plannin andtoning FROM: DATE: March 22, 2000 RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1 ST Review - New Site Plan Project: Commerce Road Realty Location: High Ridge Commerce Park Agent: - Del Swilley File No: NWSP 00-002 mJ&@&aw&@ MAR 2 3 20ca PUBLIC WORKS D EPT. Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments to me no later than 5:00 P.M. on March 27. 2000. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Lusia Galav. 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. 4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or Page 2 Development Department Memo 00-076 Commerce Road Realty TO: TRC Members when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified. 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to me for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum. Lusia Galav will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC) members. MWR/nl Attachment XC: Steve Gale, Fire Marshal Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities and Interim Director of Engineering Don Johnson, Building Division Christine Roberts, Public Works Director Central File J:ISHRDATAIPlanningISHARED\WPIPROJECTSICommerce Road Realty\1 STREVIEW-PLANS.doc TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT FOR COMMERCE ROAD REAL TV Palm Beach County, Florida 12-14-1999 Prepared By: Jeff H. Iravani, Inc. Consulting Engineers 1934 Commerce Lane Suite 5 Jupiter, Florida 33458 Tel (561) 575-6030 Fax (561) 575-6088 12.1'4- 'Ii JeffH. lravani, P.E. FlOiida Registration #33155 Table Of Contents Item Page Introduction 1 Trip Generation 1 Radius of Influence 2 Traffic Assignment 2 Affected Arterials 2 Impact Analysis 2 Exhibit "A" Location Map Exhibit "B" ADT Exhibit "e" PM PHT Exhibit "D" DPHM Introduction The site is located east of High Ridge Road on Commerce Road and consists of 1.26 ac of vacant land. A 20,380 SF office/warehouse is proposed. See Exhibit "A". The access is to be provided by one turnout onto Commerce Road. The buildout and 100% occupation is expected by the end of 2000. This report shall analyze the traffic impact ofthe proposed project on the adjacent roadway system in accordance with Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code (ULDC) Traffic Performance Standards. Trip Generation Institute Of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 6th edition, and Palm Beach County approved trip generation rates were utilized to obtain the Average Daily Trips (ADT) and the AM & PM Peak Hour Trips (PHT). The proposed average daily trips is 395 Vehicle Trip Ends Per Day (VTEPD). For the purposes of this traffic report general office was used for the calculations, Use ADT AM PM VTEPD VTEPH VTEPH IN OUT IN OUT Office (ITE 710) 20.380 KSF @ 20.4 (PBC) 416 28 4 5 25 Pass-by @ 5% 21 1 0 0 Total Generated Proposed 395 27 4 5 24 Radius Of Influence As per Palm Beach County ULDC, the radius of influence for this project is .5 mile for test-I. Therefore, the affected links are: 1. High Ridge Road. For test-2, the radius of influence shall be only those links directly accessed onto the first accessed major thoroughfare which is also High Ridge Road. Trip Assignment The proposed trips are assigned to the arterials within the radius of Influence based on the followings: North 50% South 50% A directional split of 50% is assumed on all affected links. Affected Arterials Commerce Road and High Ridge Road are both two lane undivided roadways at this time. Both links are operating below the LOS "0" threshold at the present time. Impact Analysis Exhibits "B" & "C" indicate the proposed and total AOT and the PM PHT on the affected arterials at buildout All the affected arterials will be operating below the LOS "0" threshold. Exhibit "0" indicates the driveway peak hour trips. No additional roadway improvements shall be required. This project meets test-l and test-2, Therefore, the proposal is in conformance with Palm Beach County ULOC Article 15, Traffic Performance Standards. 2 HYPOLUXO ROAD o <( o cr w C) o 0::: I C) I EXHIBIT "A" TO 1-95 .. COMMERCE ROAD VICINITY MAP SITE EXHIBIT "B" HYPOLUXO ROAD E 4,752 B 703 0 14.8% P 198 T 5,653 ~ C 14,300 o ~ w ~ Q a= :I: <:> I COMMERCE ROAD PROJECT E 4,752 395 B 703 0 14.8" P 197 T 5,652 C 14,300 E 1998/1999 AAOT PER PBC MPO B BACKGROUND TRAFFIC PER PBC HISTORICAL GROWTH P PROJECT TRAFFIC T TOTAL TRAFFIC C CAPACITY, LOS "0" THRESHOLD AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS (VTEPD) EXHIBIT "c" HYPOLUXO ROAD E 442 8 65 P 15 T 552 CI C 1.330 "" 0 ~ w ~ CI ~ :r: Q :r: COMMERCE ROAD PROJECT E 442 29 B 65 P 14 T 551 C 1,330 E 1998/1999 AADT PER PBC MPO X 0.093 B BACKGROUND TRAFFIC PER PBC HISTORICAL GROWTH P PROJECT TRAFFIC T TOTAL TRAFFIC C CAPACITY, LOS "0" THRESHOLD PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS (VTEPH) I EXHIBIT "0" 5 PM 28 AM ~ COMMERCE ROAD a <( o cr w (j a cr I (j I l PROJECT 4 AM 25 PM DRIVEWAY PEAK HOUR MOVEMENTS (VTEPH) - -------------------~-----_._- ----~ - - -.-- -------------- DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 00-077 FROM: TRC MEMBERS Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Mike Lane, Police Department Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department Michael Haag, Building Division Lusia Galav, Planning Division Larry Quinn, Public Works Department John Wildner, Parks Division Frantz LaFontant, Engineering Department David Kelley, Engineering Department ;111~ Michael W. Rumpf i JuyV Director of Plannin' andoZoning TO: DATE: March 22, 2000 RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1 ST Review - New Site Plan Project: Commerce Road Realty Location: High Ridge Commerce Park Agent: - Del Swilley File No: NWSP 00-002 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments to me no later than 5:00 P.M. on March 27. 2000. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Lusia Galav. 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. 4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or Page 2 Development Department Memo 00-076 Commerce Road Realty TO: TRC Members when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified. 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to me for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum. Lusia Galav will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC) members. MWR/nl Attachment XC: Steve Gale, Deputy Fire Marshal Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities and Interim Director of Engineering Don Johnson, Building Division Christine Roberts, Public Works Director Central File J:ISHRDAT AIPlanninglSHAREDlWPIPROJECTSICommerce Road Realtyl1 STREVIEW-PLANS,doc Lewis, Nicole From: Sent: To: Subject: Wildner, John Thursday, March 23,20004:02 PM Lewis, Nicole Commerce Road Realty Parks Division has reviewed the above referenced plans. We have no comments at the present time 1