REVIEW COMMENTS
~VELOPMENTDEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 00-272
SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION
November 16, 2000
REVISED
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Project Name/No.: Boynton Shoppes PCD (f.k.a. Heise PCD) NWSP 00-013
Retail Outparcel
Property Owner: Boynton Shoppes L.L.C.
Applicant/Agent: Robert E. Basehart, Basehart Consulting, Inc.
Location: S.E. corner of Woolbright Road and Congress Avenue
Land Use/Zoning: LRC (Local Retail)/ PCD
Type of Use: Retail
Project size:
Total Site Area:
3.63 acres (158,122.8 square feet)
Outparcel Area:
Outparcel Building Area:
0.727 acres (31,668 square feet)
3,000 square feet
Adjacent Uses:
(see Exhibit "An - Location Map)
North - Woolbright Road and farther north Office, zoned C1;
South -
PCD parking area and farther south Christian Villas, zoned R-3;
East
Suntrust Bank, zoned C-3; and
West
Amoco/McDonalds zoned C-3 and farther west, Congress Avenue.
Site Characteristics: This flag-shaped PCD site is currently developed as an 18,530 square foot commercial
center on 3.63 acres. The commercial center consists of three buildings and related parking
facilities. The 0.727 acre vacant outparcel which is the subject of this application is located
in the northeast corner of the PCD next to the combination Amoco/McDonalds business
zoned C-3. The area is landscaped with grass and has a shrub hedge buffer located along
the east boundary. The outparcel also contains a paved entrance drive which connects to
Woolbright Road. All other existing buildings and required landscape features have been
constructed.
Proposal:
The developer proposes to construct one 3,000 square foot building consisting of two (2)
1,500 square foot retail bays on a 0.727 acre outparcel (see Exhibit "B" - Proposed Site
Plan). This application is being accompanied by the prerequisite request for a master plan
modification to allow for the additional square footage on the currently approved master
plan. Furthermore, due to the dimensional restrictions on the out-parcel, the applicant is
, requesting one variance. The variance will reduce the required PCD side setback from 30
feet to 12.5 feet along the east side of the site. Please refer to Memorandum No. PZ 00-316
for the review of the master plan modification and Revised Memorandum No, PZ 00-258 for
the review of the variance request.
Page 2
Boynton Shop pes - Site Plan Review Staff Report - Revised
Memorandum No. PZ 00-272
Concurrency:
a. Traffic-
A revised traffic statement for this project was submitted and approved by the Palm
Beach County Traffic Division.
b. Drainage-
Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The City's
concurrency ordinance requires drainage certification at time of site plan approval.
The Engineering Division is recommending that the review of specific drainage
solutions be deferred until time of permit review, when more complete engineering
documents are required.
Driveways:
On-site traffic circulation for the commercial center consists of two (2) existing, two-way
driveways. One entry drive is 30 feet wide and provides access to Congress Avenue. The
other driveway is 27 feet wide and provides access to Woolbright Road. This driveway is
located on the outparcel just west of the proposed building, The site plan indicates that this
driveway will be handling 735 trips per day. The driveway design meets the requirements of
Land Development Regulations Chapter 23.
Parking Facility: The site plan indicates the proposed number of parking spaces for the entire commercial
center as 125 spaces including six (6) handicapped spaces. A total of 109 spaces are
required per code including the 15 spaces for the proposed outparcel development. The
outparcel parking spaces are calculated based on the ratio of one (1) space per 200 square
feet for the retail bays.
Landscaping: The landscaping of the site will fully meet code requirements when staff comments are
incorporated.
Building and Site: Building and site regulations will be fully met when staff comments are incorporated into the
permit drawings.
Community Design: The proposed building is a simple, contemporary style, square-shaped, one-story structure.
The building fa<;ades are enhanced with decorative columns including awnings over the
entrance doors facing Woolbright Road. The building design is compatible with the
established architectural character of the existing buildings in the PCD. The PCD is
automotive-oriented and a fast-food restaurant is located adjacent to the subject site. The
required landscape buffers have been installed throughout and will meet the code.
Signage:
The applicant has not submitted site signage as part of this review. The Boynton Shoppes
PCD has an approved master sign plan. All proposed signs must be consistent with the
approved master sign plan. Approval of signs contrary to the sign program will require a
separate submittal and approval process.
RECOMMENDATION:
Consistent with the analysis and recommendations on the corresponding applications for a Master Plan
Modification (REZN 00-001) and a variance (ZNCV 00-013), staff recommends approval of the site plan subject to
all other conditions of approval indicated in Exhibit "C".
xc: Central File
\\CH\MAIN\SHRDATA\Planning\SHAREOIWP\.PROJECTS\8oynton Shoppes\Sjte Plan Staff Re;lCrt REV NWS? 00-013 doc
L,OCATION MAP~ _
B6y .-JTON SHOPPE~
,
EXHISITrrJ
p
u
o
--':-l\/.' .,/ ,:....j i) i i
)J ~I'\:. ,(f:! C,., '
-rrll? v' .J-i U II.'
"I , , 'j. - '. ell ("1 r.. '
..!:::,i \-'. , . .1 '->'
-::: PUDCi',
1-~Cii~0- rm'u
~: i.lt:~, II \1; I I
~p Nf.~ ': ;-r-, \\ )i I I I
;: > . ',', " 'j' '-....// \ .
~: --.l\ !,:;,_ru,t: ...../ !'
'(":'-'/f: l:.=~.:"fC.v . .......:::-;;...:-c-:-,..-
I I ~....r '. ,- '..c....~^~. _. ,. ,
.<,.-:,...~_.-, ..'!J....-----.. 1 I '.'
- fI- .--~: I..... i r~;! '
!f :'~"If:crr~,---..:,!.,-.Ji. ~~l
II _ -..r. ....:. II'
1: I , _ ~ . . .1
U: ~'1 _ _ \~:-_..,,\ ~
I -- II '";!; "j \,' Ii
~.~... /'="'"., I \_
f -.' \ -~d '\'I"li
.~.~'..~,q '~ .J:]
,: ./ ~~ r. ~-\" .;1 ,
'" - - I .. ... -. .
'-" I',: .:;, :.'"._ I
~........-- I ,':..- ......~ ."
\0....) \. R E C ~~~'-:-I(;; f --~.f.
- ~ r ( ,l_....... J _. .
CF:Z,"'~ .......-r r ~'r- /...."...- I . ~ . .. '--' "'_ , t
' S \ \ '. I' , , , ~--.d":',. ':4J : ~ : JJ
. -d--j L~"-_':,J&:").4._h"-:".~~~}
G -, -j..-}. 'I". .... _ 1\' ~"'.....,1
-. ' , .' . ,~.... '..i! -j! '-',1--;1
.., :-: ('~ ...' If , ... --:Ji -::- .r. _lii:__-...
- ~ L-A . _' .. 1- . _ . .. ..,
. '::c;::...' J :.,." ...... q ~.,., ~ . ,~ . .-
- , " V ~ -.;;:=-.; ;oJ"1 ^'. ."
'.:. :../ ''-1 -.., ,~_ ~_ ~"_, '.
,"--. S '~"r-;-i'{l.f}I.J.
~-'~J~./-I y. M l.l,:,,~,ll):!.ll"':':',
~r"I) t<'.-, ::-:J L...., \ ~,- ; _ '11..;..' ;J.~n. '_",'
ttj-;i~=:I;;;j ; '",'R1::>A~^"'-~:" i: I! ~.:~;'
'li..-;--I....,~. ~ ~__(~
,..1.--,'- I" ' 'J " ~ ' ", __ . ...........'
- ~F~ i,~i ;, ,\~~, ' UOJ\C'~ ~'?~~~~
" "_' ": ;\, ' ',:, --, ,:."....,. '-.. ~., ,~
.'~?r'=~..J ,....., '.;, ':'~'"...,............. .' f""">-o7iY'\;
... 1"..\ ""-.\ '~~,. ' ....'. -.......... _', \,qr~J.o
" ,; , \ '. , ........ . ""1.0, "'. "> '. '.i-.. /'
" . .-c:x:::--\.......~~ ':' '. ' "~"0..." '0::" ~_. ~', '1'?:, : j
io l< . \ ,/' - . '. , ,-. _-......., _ ... 1
~ -: ~ ~. ).....'-};....<','''V. ....":,, \':- '-':';;.;;J;r<-' /: .b....)',.., '\'._
~; ~,.:fT.\:"".""V/~~"~"'"'''' '>".::;"'.j,,v, </;\.. \,>::; 1\
~~ "1;-'.',.,"" .',' ~/~". . .~. '''-,.''-,' .' or"~ \
,,"0.- -'Z.-.... .' ,'. '...~. '",,"--.. '. ...... ...:". "/ -::::. <\
I,! 'I ' 1:-' " 4"'. " ".'" 77" . '. '. ... A' \, \ \
U......... "';':".'.:o)( ',' --,..j...... ",<- .;'/ ~-:', ~
'-.. ....................~. '. '" '. /.,',",: /..,./. . -'.. , . :( I..... .
' ':-'" '. ", ~ ' '.' '- " ~. ....' . \, \ '.. ~
I! ~.~::.)) .:'/l>;/.:/ .'~' r". .~.'. ,:' :""-". 't:j.\ ',... ",,"c.~
II .,1 , J " .. .. "-.' " 0'" . -:'.'.' I:'. --\ ,', n. :. \ '- . '(\ \.' \ _ '9.. \ -z.
' '<l , ' . "", ~ ", , \\' . .., \ \\ '..' ~
I.... ~ '/,' ~:;.: . ,)00'.' ..., ') . : I '': \~,~ . ',.. .. 1\. . ,- -' '.J.
' ,> 'I' d :'p.,;\'./,-:i_.' ,! : ,\,-:., ~;,.:~>
l:q r:::::c:-..~ 0 '.: 0 . " "~ ,.:",..., 3 ..\ " , '"....... " \ \
I > , i ~. - - .', 'i' ;;:-., _, (' r--\ ,:/ " ... \ ( . <, " . ;\ ',\ ,_ "
'\ "...., . ^...... . \., ~ ~... ..:;' , . \ \ " ); , ! I \',~,
-"..- -.-- . ., ..' , '1""1~L~;! --"';',\" , ' ;-- ~ j , ~ . /:_ '. ',.,--,
.. ,_., ,'. \. iILl..) . ----'..r-.--!'., .....:"i"\-"',
~~~ f~i, \,,:," :~:"'~";~'~R' 'EC ~ ,r :"lr7"~;-~:~l:: : k : Ii". '.')S~
11\ ~ I ;'\.Ll...:.). ; I" '_ -: : ~/.: ~: ~ r. ' j...... ".'~
~ -~ ~ ~ ,:~ '. i1~ ! fen ftT'~!'?''"_;~~. I ' jf: i. i -i : -lor : :~. 4:':.
10: , . ',' , '-., ;:,.L';""'~-'J ..~., ~ ~i" ~ ~'\v
\J l' ,I I e- ~-r~F'iTT, ~. ,; . . . . ' t .. , .;:.. .
... ...,. "III 1(-:-11,:~" ~.L._....~ ~ !:! j jJ,1 t',...., "'::<' "''W\:'''-::'' "
0< ~'I~,~.j"-':""'~~r~~, \' -'--1~--"""
~ I . .-'" 1 r ~, . ' . -' _.. . ..
CJ ~-----r-r-,' _ ..,
-::- ,\ ..... - r I I i R 3
/J ~
1
I
J i:
I ~
. ,
=
.- ~~. I--~
r.
~
3
.:'
'. ,'"
.,...~:' -
:l.
UI: "D' ..
j - - .
" I
:f I"
, 'I
I '_C"
~~ 'J~:~
;~t,
'..:...;..--
- ----
- (
(-.
0;:
,':I
c.
..,
..
1/8
I j10 ~L FEET
I 04 .... fj" I'....././';
1"'5/0/00.1
M\. ow Of' c:......
, Tl 'T! "":1
.....,...( '--- ,I
u_'-L~~..,
~
I' I ~.I
r.f.rrr-!r;--;' ;.... -, i
~
r'
, )
i.
:~,
:"'1
,~I '--
. \
.. -~. .' .'
, ,.... --
, r..--rr-:_ ---;;r I
. ------------
DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 00-337
TO:
Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning~
Don Johnson, Building Official ~
October 16, 2000
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Boynton Shoppes - New Site Plan (NWSP 00-013) - 3rd review comments
We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board
review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the
working drawings that are submitted for permit review.
Buildin~ Division (Permit & Site Specific Comments) - Don Johnson (561) 742-6366
1. The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site
data. "The proposed finish floor elevation of _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-
year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the South Florida
Water Management District's surface water management construction development
regulations." Correct the inconsistencies with respect to the finish floor elevation. The
civil drawings indicate a different elevation than the site pan and floor plan drawing.
[Section 3107.1.2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edition of the
Standard Building Code]
2. Permits are required to construct the improvements that are shown on the approved site
plan. Permit application forms are available in the Building Division ofthe Development
Department. A permit submittal checklist is available in the Building Division. The list
identifies the basic documents that the Plans Analyst checks for when an applicant submits
for permit review.
3. At time of permit review, provide detailed drawings and documentation on the plans that
will verify the accessible route that is shown from the accessible parking spaces to the
accessible building entrances is in compliance with the regulations of the Florida
Accessibility Code for Building Construction. The documentation shall include, but not be
limited to, identifying the type of material proposed for the route, type of surface finish,
width, cross slope, slope and length of the entire accessible route including, where
applicable, landings, ramps and handrails.
4. At time of permit review, specify (in tabular form) on the site plan and/or floor plan the
proposed use of the facility, type of construction and occupancy classification of the
building. The building area, occupancy classification and type of construction shall comply
with the specifications identified in the 1997 edition of the Standard Building Code,
including the City of Boynton Beach amendments to the Standard Building Code. Working
drawings of the buildingW shall comply with the codes specified in Chapter 20 of the Land
Development Regulations.
Building Division Memo No. 00-337 to Michael Rumpf
RE: Boynton Shoppes - New Site Plan - 3rd review comments
October 16, 2000
Page Two
5. The permit fee, water and sewer facility fees, Fire and Life Safety fees, County fees and
State fees will be determined at time of permit review.
DJ:bg
P.S. Cost for third review by Michael E. Haag = $18.23
Cost for third review by Don Johnson = 20.09
Cost for clerical time for Bonnie Glinski = 8.37
Total cost = $46.69
\\CH\MAI}''\SHRDA T A \Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 00-013 3rd review Boynton shoppes,doe
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPME'" "
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 00-296
FROM:
TRC MEMBERS
Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
John Huntington, Police Department
Louie Zeitinger, Police Department
H. David Kelley, Utilities Department
Michael Haag, Building Division
Larry Quinn, Public Works Department
Lusia Galav, Planning Division
H. David Kelley, ~ng.i,n, ering Department
..). !
Michael W. Rum/ ~
Planning and Zo . Irector
TO:
DATE:
October 10,2000
RE:
3rd Review - New Site Plan
Project - Boynton Shop pes
Location - 1620 South Congress Avenue
Agent - Mr. Robert Basehart, Basehart Consulting Inc.
File No. NWSP 00-013
Please document your review time and calculated cost based on your hourly rate plus benefits,
for the 3rd review on the above reference project. This project was reviewed at TRC on
Tuesday, August 29,2000. Please provide me with this documentation no later then Thursday
October 12, 2000.
J:\SHRDATA\PlanningISHAREDlWPlPROJECTS\Boynton Shoppesl3rd Review Memo {TRC),doc
\ \tv\. Lo \ bb
\ \
\
TO:
. t-~-~ ---.._-_
rfD I ~ r;u .-~ ---~
/' ~~Ltf if ~rrr-~--1
Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning (, ~ If; l ! Sfp _ -', ,:,:-J'i., {jJ /
Michael E. Haag, Building Code Administra{(Jr--...tV~' 5, -uu ;.
o
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 00-264
FROM:
DATE:
September 5,2000
',--
RE:
Boynton Shoppes - New Site Plan (NWSP 00-013) - 2nd review comments
We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board
review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the
working drawings that are submitted for permit review.
Buildine Division (Permit & Site Specific Comments) - Michael E. Haae (561) 742-6352
1. Amend the size of the notes or "callouts" found within the limits of construction shown on
the site plan for the new work. The notes or "callouts" are not legible. Add to the new
building that is depicted on the site plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the
handicap accessible entrance door to each tenant space. Identify on the site plan the width
of the accessible sidewalk leading to the accessible entrance of each tenant. Identify on the
site plan the location and width of the proposed awnings.
2. The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site
data. "The proposed finish floor elevation of _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-
year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the South Florida
Water Management District's surface water management construction development
regulations." Correct the inconsistencies with respect to the finish floor elevation. The
civil drawings indicate a different elevation than the site pan and floor plan drawing.
[Section 3107.1.2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edition of the
Standard Building Code]
3. On the site plan, indicate within the footprint of the proposed new building the number of
stories that are in the building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Also, add to the
site data the number of stories in the new building including identifying mezzanines, where
applicable.
4. Identify on the site plan and floor plan drawing the number of seats that are proposed for
the fast food restaurant. Also, add to the site data the total number of seats proposed. At
time of permit review, show and chronologically number all seats on the floor plan.
5. Permits are required to construct the improvements that are shown on the approved site
plan. Permit application forms are available in the Building Division of the Development
Department. A permit submittal checklist is available in the Building Division. The list
identifies the basic documents that the Plans Analyst checks for when an applicant submits
for permit review.
Building Division Memo No. 00-264 to Michael Rumpf
RE: Boynton Shoppes - New Site Plan - 2nd review comments
September 5, 2000
Page Two
6. At time of permit review, provide detailed drawings and documentation on the plans that
will verify the accessible route that is shown from the accessible parking spaces to the
accessible building entrances is in compliance with the regulations of the Florida
Accessibility Code for Building Construction. The documentation shall include, but not be
limited to, identifying the type of material proposed for the route, type of surface finish,
width, cross slope, slope and length of the entire accessible route including, where
applicable, landings, ramps and handrails.
7. At time of permit review, specify (in tabular form) on the site plan and/or floor plan the
proposed use of the facility, type of construction and occupancy classification of the
building. The building area, occupancy classification and type of construction shall
comply with the specifications identified in the 1997 edition of the Standard Building
Code, including the City of Boynton Beach amendments to the Standard Building Code.
Working drawings ofthe buildingW shall comply with the codes specified in Chapter 20 of
the Land Development Regulations.
8. The permit fee, water and sewer facility fees, Fire and Life Safety fees, County fees and
State fees will be determined at time of permit review.
MEH:bg
J:\SHRDA TA\Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 00-013 2nd review Boynton shoppes,doe
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES
MEMORANDUM
NO. 00-165 A
ID) ~ @ ~ ~~~ ~ ~
lJl}[ ., 2 2 <UOO . \..d
~_.~----' .
, PLANNiNG f,,\:l \
ZONING DITT. " . .~~;
THRU:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director ofPla~~ng..::-d Zoning
John A. Guidry, Utilities Director ~
H. David Kelley, Jr., PE/PSM, Utility Engineer ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
July 28, 2000 - Updated Review August 18. 2000
RE:
BOYNTON SHOPPES - 1 ST REVIEW
NWSP 00-013
Subsequent to our initial July 28, 2000, review of this project, the applicant's representative
communicated with this office to identify that the plan sheet titled "Schematic Engineering" was intended
to be the concept utility plan. Based upon this identification, we offer the following plan review
comments on the above noted project:
GENERAL COMMENTS
1) All utility easements shall be shown on the rectified site plan and landscaping drawings so that we
may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. Current landscape plan indicates a new
laurel oak and an existing mahogany tree within 5 feet of the proposed water service lateral, and a
mahogany tree on top of the sanitary lateral. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species
allowed within utility easements or adjacent to service laterals. Canopy trees may be planted
outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the
easement or service laterals in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 give public utilities the
authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or
public rights-of-way.
2) Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for the water and sewer systems
serving this project (CODE Sec. 26-12).
3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m.
as stated in LDR Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (see CODE Sec. 26-16(a)). This generally requires a two-point source of
water. Plan indicates a fire hydrant(?) at the northeast comer of the property. Please indicate the
second hydrant location.
4) CODE Sec. 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon
the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within
30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final
meter size, or expected demand.
Department of Utilities Memo Nc J-165 A (Memo No. 00-165 Revised)
Re: Boynton Shoppes 1 st Review
August 18, 2000
Page Two
5) Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. City water may
not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. Landscape Plan
does not indicate source of irrigation water.
6) Consider raising the building finish floor to elevation 15.50 to better fit the selected site, and to
enhance the surface stormwater drainage flow. Review of schematic elevations reflect some
surface flowlines to be less than 0.32% slope.
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
1. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility
easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum
width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in
CODE Sec. 26-33(a). Iflines sho\\>TI are representative of service laterals only, the sanitary lateral
will require a PBCHD permit (see #2) above).
2. LDR Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of
an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by
showing all hydrants (see #3) above).
3. Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building,
and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with CODE Sec. 26-207. Plan states one;
indicate where in the service lateral it will be placed.
4. Proposed building elevation plan indicates both businesses to be "retail" and "fast food". Show
the location of the grease interceptor tank in the wastewater lateral. The waste stream from the
"fast food" process must meet the City's pretreatment requirements. A sampling point must be
provided to allow monitoring of this waste stream (refer to CODE Sec. 26-143, Sec. 26-147).
5. The wastewater (sanitary) lateral is shown under the dumpster pad; this is not permitted. Either
relocate the sanitary lateral or the dumpster pad.
6. The tentative utility support to the proposed building lacks sufficient information to appropriately
determine whether proper service is available. As such, this Department considers the plan
incomplete. Applicant is advised to enhance the utility support plan prior to re-submittal.
PAVEMENT NOTES
A. In plan note #2, correct the word "yielding", and eliminate the phrase "FBV of 50 psi". FBV
testing has not been in the FDOT vocabulary for the last 20 years.
C:\My Documents\Boynton Shoppes 1st Rev.- Revision to Utility Dept. Memo 00-165,doc
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #00-127
TO:
Mike Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning
Christine Roberts, Interim Public Works Director~
VIA:
FROM:
Mark A. Lips, Solid Waste Crew Supervisor
DATE:
August 3, 2000
SUBJECT: 1 st Review
Project -
Location -
Agent -
File No. -
Boynton Shoppes
Congress Avenue
Heise
NWSP 00-0013
The Public Works Department is asking to see detailed drawings of Dumpster enclosure.
If you have any questions please contact me at (561) 742-6200.
LQ/pl
Attachment
, '.
1(0111 .w....r
i.l nl,; .": .
~ _< L~ - J - ......
"'--
. fn. f2.~. r-.
..,y . l~, ! f1
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES
MEMORANDUM
NO. 00-165
FROM:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director of p~in~d Zoning
John A. Guidry, Utilities Director t ~
H. David Kelley, Jr., PE/PSM, Utility Engineer'~
TO:
THRU:
RE:
July 28, 2000
BOYNTON SHOPPES - 1 st REVIEW
NWSP 00-013
DATE:
We offer the following comments on the above noted project:
GENERAL COMMENTS
1. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore the Utilities Department considers this
plan unacceptable as submitted and recommends that it not be forwarded to the P & D Board for
consideration.
S:\Engineering\Engineering Dept. Memorandum,doc
__ ____~_ -_0--_-- _____ ---,..
cn .I. OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
FILE: NWSP-OO-013
FROM:
Michael W. Rumpf DATE:
Dir. of Planning & Zoning
7/27/00
Off Louis J. Zeitinger
Off John Huntington
Police Department
Crime Prevention Unit
SUBJECT: Boynton Shops
REFERENCES: Site Plan
ENCLOSURES:
I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments:
1. No Comments.
FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION
Memorandum No. 2000-100
@,..
,..-,'-"'._,c- ..
, hI
r-W "
NFPA Life Safety Code 101, National Fire Code 1, all applicable National Fire
Protection Association codes, and the City Fire code shall be adhered to.
. . '. ,~."."
,
Planning & Zoning
DATE:
~)
Steve Gale .
Fire Marsha r
July 25, 2000
FROM:
SUBJECT: Boynton Shoppes
1620 S Congress Ave
NWSP 00-013
No part of the structure may be more than 200 feet from a hydrant.
LDR 6-16.
A fire hydrant flow test will be required prior to construction. LDR 6-
16.
Plans may go forward with these comments.
cc: File
; rnlO--- ~ @rnn w ~ ~-'l :
II~il_:-~'!i,'
1\H" .--
......,j
PL;,i'jj',,: ,', ,','
ZONiNG Di:er.
i
,...;
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
MEMORANDUM
NO. 00-116
THRU:
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director of Planning and
John A. Guidry, Interim Director of Enginee
FROM:
H. David Kelley, Jr., PE/PSM, CivillUtilit
DATE:
July 27, 2000
RE:
1. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting, paving,
drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies
such as FDOT, PBC, SEWMD, DERM, LWDD, DEP and others, shall be included with the
permit request.
2. Show the proposed locations of the following:
a. Dumpster - Chapter 4, Section 7 B.
b. Site Lighting - Chapter 4, Section 7 B.
c. Off-street loading space (12' x 35'). Chapter 2, Section II J.
3. On the site and civil plans, add the following traffic control devices Chapter 4, Section 7B:
a. Add a right turn only pavement arrow at the egress driveway and a corresponding post sign
underneath the stop sign. Also show a one-way arrow sign in the median.
b. Show a stop sign and bar at the egress aisle of the eight stall parking lot.
c. Show double, yellow lane separation stripes at the entrance.
d. Locate the HIC post sign in the HIC parking space.
4. Delete the first two parking spaces along the west property line to eliminate vehicular back-up into
the east parking lot entrance.
5. On the site and civil plans, show the sidewalk at the same elevation as the HIC accessibility path
with an accessible ramp up on both sides per the Florida Accessibility Code.
6. Correct the civil plan to reflect the sidewalks to the building shown on the site plan.
7. On the site and civil plans, show the location of the menu board for the drive-thru facility.
8. Due to the traffic speed along Woolbright Road, it is highly recommended that the ingress
driveway be restriped to a 15' wide aisle for a more efficient transition to the site; the egress
driveway would reduce to 12' wide.
Department of Engineering Meml,~..illdum No. 00-116
Re: Boynton Shoppes Site Plan - 1 st Review - NWSP 00-013
July 27,200
Page Two
9. Add the following note and engineers' certification to the civil plans:
1. All striping, signage and markings shall conform to city standard drawing B-9800 1
Correct the parking detail on the site plan accordingly.
2. The drainage will conform with the city's land development regulations, and specifically,
with Chapters 6 and 23.
10. Delete the word message, "Proposed Cross Access" on the site plan.
11. The 27' dimension from the west property line to the west side of the building is incorrect. Delete
the callout or correct the number to read 54'.
12. The site is part of the P.C.D. parcel, which has its front setbacks along Congress Avenue. The 30'
side setback call outs should reflect front and rear set backs. Submit a variance to reduce the rear
setback from 40' to 17.5'.
13. The building elevations plan indicates both businesses to be "retail food". Revise the required
parking calculations to reflect the uses shown.
14. If this addition to the P.C.D. will generate 3,000 single-direction vehicular trips per day or 250
single direction vehicular trips in a one hour period, then submit a traffic impact analysis to Palm
Beach County Engineering with copies to the Planning Division and the Engineering Department.
The Engineering Department considers this plan unacceptable as submitted and recommends that it not be
forwarded to the P & D board.
S:\Engineering\Engineering Dept. Memorandum.doe
TO:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 00-230 ,1:1' :
Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning \ ,4::- J;~ r'-" "
't. r tLlLl.'
Michael E. Haag, Building Code Administrat~ .
August 4, 2000 V
FROM:
DATE:
'-"-".--.-':'--- ......,..
RE:
Boynton Shoppes - New Site Plan (NWSP 00-013) - 1st review comments
We have reviewed the plans for the above-referenced project. The applicant must acknowledge
and address the below listed comments before the Building Division will recommend that the
project be presented to the Board for their review.
Buildin~ Division (Permit & Site Specific Comments) - Michael E. Haa~ (561) 742-6352
1.
Add to the building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan a labeled symbol that
identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door to each tenant space of the
proposed new building.
2.
The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building
codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the new drawing
titled Floor Plan. Add to the floor plan drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the
location of the handicap accessible entrance door to each tenant. The location of the doors
shall match the location of the accessible entrance doors that are depicted on the site plan
drawing.
3.
The site plan shows that twenty-seven (27) parking spaces are being added to the site for
the proposed new building. Therefore, two (2) handicap accessible spaces are required.
Amend the drawings to show no less than the required number of accessible spaces. The
quantity of the spaces shall be consistent with the regulations specified in the Florida
Accessibility Code for Building Construction. The accessible parking spaces that serve a
use shall be located on the shortest safely accessible route oftravel from adjacent parking
to an accessible entrance. The Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction states
that buildings with multiple accessible entrances shall have accessible parking spaces
dispersed and located closest to the accessible entrance.
Building Division Memo No. 00-230 to Michael Rumpf
RE: Boynton Shoppes - New Site Plan - 1 st review comments
August 4, 2000
Page Two
4. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of
travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the
accessible entrance doors to each tenant space. The symbol shall start at the accessible
parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to the building. The symbol
shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning
or other pavement markings that are required to be installed along the path. The location of
the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located
behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The
minimum width required by the code is forty-four (44) inches). Add text to the drawing
that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed
in compliance with Section 4.3 (Accessible Route) and 4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading
Zones) of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. Please note that at
time of permit review the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that
will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the
Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. This documentation shall include,
but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel.
5. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is
proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with
regulations ofthe code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following
issues [Section 3107.1.2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edition
of the Standard Building Code]:
a) The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site
data, "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-
year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the South
Florida Water Management District's surface water management construction
development regulations."
b) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the
building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there
is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans.
c) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building
within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor
plan and paving/ drainage (civil plans).
6. On the drawing titled site plan, identify and label the symbol that represents the property
line.
Building Division Memo No. 00-230 to Michael Rumpf
RE: Boynton Shoppes - New Site Plan - 1 st review comments
August 4, 2000
Page Three
7. On the site plan, indicate within the footprint of the proposed new building the number of
stories that are in the building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Add to the site
data the number of stories in the new building including identifying mezzanines, where
applicable. Also, indicate the overall height of the new building within the site data.
8. On all floor plan drawings, indicate within the footprint of the building the number of
stories that are in the building including, where applicable, mezzanines.
9. The plans are inconsistent with respect to identifying the use ofthe facility. The site plan
drawing indicates the use ofthe two tenant spaces as Retail and Fast Food w/drive through
and the floor plan indicates Retail/Food for both tenant spaces. Correct the plans
accordingly.
10. Identify on the site plan drawing the actual distance that the building is set back from the
south and west property lines. Please note that overhangs, covered walkways, canopies,
awnings or other appurtenances that are attached to the building shall be considered when
identifying building setbacks. Therefore, identify the width of the proposed awnings that
extend out beyond the main walls of the building as shown on the elevation view drawings.
The building setbacks shall comply with setback regulations specified in the Zoning Code.
11. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed
construction.
12. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the project, identify on the
site plan if the restaurant is a high quality, eat-in high turn over, or fast food with drive-
through type of restaurant. Also, identify on the site plan and floor plan drawing the
number of seats for each tenant space. Add to the site plan the total number of seats
provided for both tenants. On the floor plan, show and chronologically number all seats.
13. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and
perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request.
MEH:bg
J :\SHRDA T A \Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 00-013 1 st review Boynton Shoppes.doc
LEISURE SERVICES: PARKS MEMORANDUM #00-103
TO:
Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning
John Wildner, Parks Director r
Barbara J. Meacham, Parks & Landscape Planner
THRU:
FROM:
./
,...,
RE: Review of Boynton Shoppes, Quantum Park-Lots 21 & 21B, and Lot
SO-B Quantum Corporation Park, Park Ridge Blvd.
Date July 28, 2000
The Parks Division has reviewed the plans and exhibits for the aforementioned projects
and has no comments.
Subject:
Mike Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist \'C~-1;\-
Boynton Shoppes PCD
Site Plan- 1 st Review
NWSP-OO-O 13
To:
From:
Date:
July 28, 2000
The applicant has indicated on the landscape plan the intended use of all of the existing trees and
landscaping on the site. The existing wax myrtle hedge along the West perimeter may have to be
replaced with another native hedge material. Any of the existing landscaping / irrigation that is
destroyed during construction, will have to be replaced prior to the final landscape approval.
Kjh
File
~~~c
~-~
~
/
X'o
Q
iD~
-;r~
~
~
Il
il
:r
<is
:J'
o
CI
::>
!!.
-<
~ i.
>N-Q
>g<>'g,
-\,s-!c
C"'OCl
o ;$
'"
Q,
~ ! ~f!
Land Use
Local Retail Commercial
Zoning
C-3
:?
~
.!:
--- -------\
~ I
I
\
I
I
I
,
I
- -- -------------,
"
1 ")
r----li---1 ,
I 'f I ~
L----1----J :
,
I
I
I
,
:-----r------l
: 1 I
I I
, I
L____ ___S-_J
,
I
I
log~[
I I-n
I--::S"c
I '" :I
I
~
~ .. . .
:I ~'--_ ~'lItltJi~ !In ~ !Ulil' 0
II ~ ~. i ~ h t! t, m lilH )ill ~ ~
: la; Iii!f Ifill !Il~! II ~
~t1J . lih i~;i JI 119"; ~ ~
~II I IH I! fIll- f ~
I ._ I' d & t 0
: I HI u II !UI i U;' f
I ~I;J ~nll ihl
t~!J I UP.
! f I
r ~ IIIH I 111'1 ua I Um!UIH~ mnlfd~m!ll~
~ <4 Ii ~ I 8nfl~!tf~1 JHjjldiiiJI!i~ ~
~ f I i l: Q ~~I fH I{ I !
"1l ~. p:" :" P f t ~~~ UU l r.
l::!:l~l'J tlG3~ .'!l~ I
H~~ r;~~r;~ ~ t;
........................ ...... ...... 5
IIlt~~' ,l(;~; u ~ I I
~lR S H""':- qqq f ~
li..h ~!~I - -
"l141/l1/l I/ll/lllll/l:::; J ...
w ud J.I ~~~ idl.J!i ~
1;:11111;~lil!I;~II=!i!l~ IIi 8
ft~~~ iiilIIJl~liji~ll!tt~llh ~
bl1e;IIlIllBI ;!Il!JIIIlIllIII~1ll iI~i 0
II>> _I!!-.il II ;.CIi Ii Iii- ~
I ililli_11t li~iJliil II a!
;ifil:i~~1II =;;i1itll;!i .-, ~
JIIII!III~>>i !I~ III ~.I f
:li=t;ilii!J~:!I!i.il! Ii
II ..111 !; 11111 1ll>>JJ:liw I II
1II11.11!1 ~lllliill_i~ !~
I~>>_III =i iae>>IIIICill ~l
.-iiliij 9.=~ii 1111>> a ~~
lile>>J III il,III.. ill I ~
" .
Il!'lt:,nil 1;1111
;'1 J_~n_~ Boynton Shoppes I!III
I h.-lIlJ ,'i Ih,;"
- 118 -g .
q City of Boynton Beach, Florida t · J
~ 1 li 1
i r--..I
L_________J
i:
ill
~
II
E
i:
111
~
II
E
i
O~ ~ "'tl ~~ II ~~ z
> Q
~ ~~ ~ ! I rn
~
C")~ ~ ~~ I ~ i
o iii' m m
-ifT1 0 -. :00 :00 1.1.
;~~g-~ >
CD III _.0 r-
irS' 3 ~ r-
~
e.oO:I: .. ~ i I .!
3 CD
r- Oo
.0 ~ i I !
0 ct
0
Q
,...
0"
:;]
II! ilJ=IUil IUIII
it!!:::i! Boynton Shoppes IIIII!
q City of Boynton Beach, Florida II J I
Sign ,,,--
,
I
Exisitng \
OaK "'__
~:::J
t~l
~,
~~
~,
E~
~,
~~
~~~
~,
E~
,
Exisitng/-- ~~ ,
Oak : d~ \
" ..~ J
Exisitng " b'
Wax Myrtle Hed~r
~::: 10'
~\
k
~~~
t~~
~\
E~
~\
E~
~,
E~
-..'
Exisitng,/ ~::: \
Oak : d~ \
" ..~ J
\, ::: /
'-.."
1 0' Greenbelt~
Buffer ~~~
~\3
E~i
~,
E ..t /-t~
XISI ng/ ~:::3'
Oak f (t~~1 \
\ {:::) J
" hf.'
'-~~I I
~mj/l
1 I
________________1 ~
!
Visibility
Triangles
-----
BOX UGHT
LOCATl
iC ~..1e t"\f;i : ::.:,;,,:
<t
~:L
t-~. ~~.
z.~, :..
':~: .--
Lt....;
~~?:~
.'. .;: "..:
5: l ;".
5 :: n~
~ ,.....--
lLJ
u-: ...
,-"",. "'--'-
.,
'l"
.;'"
,BOX UGHT
tOCA TlON
u.:
C/)
=0
00
"Q)o
O:::fo')
~ i
/ --'"Exisitng
I' ~~ \Olive
~ 1 \
I: ~3r, I
,\ E r J
1\ E~~ "
: ''It---/,
: r10 Greenbelt
I ~ Buffer
~
~--" Exisitng
I ,/ ~I'~ '\Olive
, r ~ \
'I E 1'.) \
I \ ~ ~ J
1\ d "
I "i'~ _//
I ~lt-
I rl~
I H
I ,,--m Exisitng
/-tl/_-.J.ir~3 \,) Oak
Q , \ ~ I
/ I".... ,/
I 100-,-
_________\_J~ ~ ~ E~~~ng
"-L ---/...1
I
I
F.F E.L.
15.00
Building Height
24' Ht.
l~
Sign
Visibility
Triangles
10' Greenbelt
Buffer
221.7
- - -
f-
--)
~
.....
o
~
<0
735 ADT
In 40
Out 32
REQUIRED HANDICAP
ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
SS7040'OS"W
117.3'
o
o
N
',,:1. _~:::
Be ,~;, : ,
.~
,-
ii:'1 (~
-..... :::::;.'
,.,."
5: .0: .~:
1
:.:::.. ~~ :......;
.'<-...... .:
Um
10' 18'1
c
;""\. on
12.5' Requested
Side Setback
27'
w
'<;j-
N
I"'")
N
""0
I.
u....
(f)
.,
<<
IY."
ti-i'
,Oy
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
W
I 1
I
I
I
I
umpster I 1
Location
x 1(~~_1
,
10 Greenbelt
Buffer
is'TYP.
iAWNING LOC
iBOX UGHT
iLOCAllON
ALL ENTRYS SHALL BE
HANDICAP ACCESSABLE
TYP.
..;
0)
..---
o
(f)
=0
.80
mO
O:::rr)'
1
1
i
/
/
@\
I
I
I
/
!
@
w
"'''-
l;;!q
1';,,1(1:
C~
l:t
0"-
>2
0..5'
""~ ,
L..___....i
!
Loading Are
12' x 35'
BOX UGH
LOCAllON
@
\~ \'
\\ ;\
\ \
\\
t "
l' "
t II
l' i'
~
\~,\\\\~
\~\'\\\\
\ \\\\
\
----
~
\~
.~~~
, '
~~~
lt~
~
n
\:
~'.
"
,I
,\
\
\~:\ ~
,~
~
l~
\~
,
,I
,\
~
~~f\ =-==
,~
~
@ill
~'T~ 6\'10/':. -, ~
UJOOI-""''''''' l'O""' . ~.. A.... """"""" <>EAcH. fC.
,-- ------- ---------- -.------"
\
\
------------------ -/.--------