REVIEW COMMENTS
C "'<'- -r, C h. "'~. ~v _c~
+-Qf(ic fT<a bk tx. is c ~ -, <;, 1 ,,-1' r ~U~ r>1> / jJc -reI,.... l-~ ( Co- -f,y,(.-t
,
J:.v 4r""; (-. -tCd-tf,c
~ ('
+- ~V~ r;"LiA'~r ~- ./'-5 ~Y;C:~T(c...-'s,f~ -r1.~ fr~j<!":c:r,
c.~ (.,_:(Sc(e.. -tr..fFtC- '(.$ c"-(c;,-.,.y,, ~, Pr,-E:.~A,
S -6 ff I S r><:rf- (":- ..../; ;; ~ ~ ~ I,j ;.-: Lv -fr~- if;- <- i ll">-r ~-.<:.- +
-- C:.-->ce,-,>,,- V\Lr:L~ n_ -fr,-,{{;c G (.f-
.~ f.
;r1c I-Iv. <-r
/ ' " (i'
l-~ ,~"-- \-~ (,./ I 'C
,/C'..5.:-d"-.? +-
1Jc.c-5. ,)~-f-
5. r ('-=.r-+ {--f
(:;/ r.::
' '0
R - r -1.
c s ;c-~~-.
- -y./ .if' '.':
,;{v'l..l;'C-
t//~v1 .s,-n' /t -
rk
,( ....00
5''1/u
/'
u;; /1 rc-.t....." ~ .>{ <-.{C'-{, {--.--f
C:-<2'~~~+'~ -=( 3~ ~ 'rJ,<
11 ( C"'"s r/~~'S LC":c
IJ}{?;'IJ ...s ~ fr' C~ll' c - ," f.;:. . .. s '-)<... '<?-C-<o..<~~ ~
<-I' 0 -IT<" '- 'S~
7-.( ~ ""-'''L ...-1
/
et-r
I"L~ ("" c".f <:::.
./,.-..
~'-'.bG
1/) 'r' +.
__ "'__''i...) ..._f" r-
'*'
. / .-L
(C~cC>C"''-J
C~<(<:,.( ns
-r
]0. j K~ <--......, c: ~
('; -I.
ICj.'vc<=... ~ {<...J<::.
'S \~ ; '~..
r; -{-f C~rl1b
~~. 'S k.-.; (( (,0::.. f ~~_" ",,'- { ~L ~ ( t--- {- k v- (y~~C de IS:--
acCY. \_-~::, '" ~ ft~ o. &'rC
/ C ,-,-f~ ---c:ff- Tr<>-{~'l~ {~b 3(-, E;~'( 'Sfic,.: i--
L ,,:'i;d~b+h ,n:c& i" '-.1'--* .., <:'., *,'~s-
If ?''':5.5?G/c./.. 6-6 <..,L.-.. ....-f'r.::(C\.--/1V"'" .[[
. c. - -( --( -. y ':J \ I So (..o~4I... s-f
\~~ <--.-~ !s Cv"'--""~~.,~~ f~c#--:' y,..ff ''(~- f 5 {,.f ?'~V
(j
'\) (,~-~C~--r
\\(1 ~I-'"
c:C~~\<->
~, I (c-<-
/._ f -[)c. ~
<[f fc~ <,~ '~I t--
~pcc<-i... h<.J,n'f5.f G...'c.'c(d/ c(l~- /vtvc?... fn fA:.
6 \ i. u- tt ({ ~4 .~ .J:;.'.n L ~ <-- "", ">-
Ul;/)
~
NOTICE OF LAND USE CHANGE
NOTICE OF ZONING CHANGE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Development Board of THE CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, will conduct a PUBLIC HEARING at CITY HALL COMMISSION
CHAMBERS, 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, on Monday, December 22, 1997 at 7:00
p.m. to consider the request described herein and submitted by Ellen Smith of Unruh, Smith
and Associates, Inc., agent for the First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach, Florida, property
owners, regarding a total of 14.18 acres located one quarter (1/4) mile north of the intersection
of Woolbright Road and S.W. 8th Avenue on the west side of S.W. 8th Avenue.
This request will also be considered by the City Commission of THE CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH, FLORIDA, on Tuesday, January 6, 1998 at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the
agenda permits at the CITY HALL COMMISSION CHAMBERS.
'i
. d..~
. ..__i)
. ....~
EC..' -',
. ,
"-1;' CEJ-r
I I
: L \
I
--. ""'Wool
1
I
t-
\
\
~ IS:
~rT !?1i
vf'- << f c. h.,r<C
C(./~-p:o- '~~5
NATURE OF REQUEST: &fp(2o---c 7:5:0 ~
To amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan from Moderate Density
Residential to Local Retail Commercial and to rezone the property from Planned Unit
Development (PUD) to Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to allow for a health care
campus . a {lursing home, assisted, care Jiving fYaCil' y. and medical offices:c- (f,7,5CC> rf)
3/.;2r~ \{I.1ob~~ / ~~O b~ ~ - r' ~"...--- 7\
LEG DESCRIPT~N~ rp) ~?J506 cf. \!?ir~ ci<'3ct- t'?~
Tract F, Woolbright Place Plat No.1, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 67,
page 47 through 49 in the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida.
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BOYNTON BEACH PCD
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING
All interested parties are notified to appear at said hearing in person or by attorney and be
heard. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Planning and Development
Soard and/or City Commission with respect to the matter considered at these meetings will
need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim
record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is to be based.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
(561) 375-6260
J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\First Baptist Church of BB\LUAR\legalnot.doc
STATUS
NAME
LOCATION
SIZE
CONTACT
Site Plan Review Grand Park Congress/Golf 1 05 Beds Lexington Health Care, Inc.
5.E CcrI("\4 954-648-7816
Site Plan Review ARC Congress/Golf 248 Beds Strategic Investments Les Mathews
SE <-<:>r-n<2o{" 770-351-0022
Site Plan Approved Palm Walk SW 19th Ave. 48 Beds Palm Walk Assoc.McDermot,
5-> s -f ~ s-f <J Will & Emory
CC(j'''''s.., ,.{v'~- 305-358-3500
Site Plan Approved Manors @ Ronald K. Kolins
Newport PI. Hypolux'p Rd. 81 Beds 659-7500
First Baptist (~s-f ,;,f f-- t5
Rezoning
Church Health Woolbright @ Unruh-Smith & Assoc.
Care Campus SW8th Ave. 60 Beds 835-8505
J:\SHRDA TA\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\SPECPROJ\ST A TUSDOC
Woolbright Place density subject to settlement offer.
Overall site is 81 acres; church is 14 acres.
Site density already exceeds comp plan:
comp plan designation is moderate density........7.26 du/ac
project density is............................................ ~08)
next category is .........medium...........................9.~
? wlo church density becomes..........................C9:8,
. top comp plan density category is maximum.,~
Traffic associated with church is 750 trips, equivalent of 75 single family homes.
-- ------ ---- - - ------ - --- -----
--------- ------~ --- - ~- - -- - --------. ---- -- ----------
p110-01 BOYN'l'ON BEACH CODE
F'OLIO
BED 8TH HB
BL'1' ADJ SQfo"l'
o 0.00
BLDG USE
10/09/97
SALE\SCJfo"l' AV
0.00
EYfo'BL'l' LV SCJE''1'
W G V P fo'LR
V 0
N/A
LEG A L D 1:: S C RIP 'I' ION
SHOPPES OF' WOOLBRIGH'l' PLA'l'BOOK
'1'R C (LESS SLY L3':,J.Lb f"r)
LOT CHARAC'l'KRlS'l'ICS PLAT PAGE
i} 3 ; 578 . 80 S Q }:'
'l'Y PE ~
'I'AX YR==>
ASSM'l' Y R
iClQ,
SALE: DAT E
AUG. i994
o AM'!'==> 0.00 PAID'!=='>'! TAX/F"r==> U.lIL1 PRIOR YR DLQ==> N
BUILDING AGRICULTURE LAND TO'I'AL ASSM'I' SQ/.I:"l'
o U ':db bbO '13b, bbLl
AMOUNT 80C.11<_ PAGl:: Q DT SALE DATE AMOUN'r BOOK PAGE Q D'
lL1U 13411 ':0131 0 QC
MORTGAGE COMPANY
AMOUNT
DATE
M'I'G TYPE
R A '1' E
NUMBER
MT K Y R
97
SELLEH=>
F2=BLDG( S';
pIlO
BLDG
LAND
HOMES'!, APPR LP
LI N N
fo'I=DEED/MTG; .!:'b=COMPS MENU
F',)=EX'I' LEGAL; .!:'/=DIMENSIONS; f'~=FEATUHES; F li}=SKE'l'CH
ISC
,)3b,bbLl
'rOT VALUE SLUC CLue BLDG CDE
':o3b:bbU III IULlU
.!<'4='l'AXES;
HEADY
J)~'
-r~j frOfV~ j fJ f t'""M at:V1, (pc~ ~ot. owvwz.1' Jelry IS fk.
OI-1.-~ y1-11'Jji:J -(rolM. -ft.e..- sv'l,~/ffd lis!,
!1 i Ko.- Sjj0~
C~e-, I~
Ho~ <t)~-t
j IVI':J it ~ a v .5:1'1 Ce.. ::r u ~ /'1
-tk. f -fk p>>oM is le~ct ~~
~ C~cJ~?::>~ (voL ~'rJ..tI-).
.-J~ c..
'\ l/ - 1 l
\.l~c t:. y 1 '\ ~'--\
yrle&; ~Jf' t,J I /}// S~ ~,.4
lJ'" /" /
.:; tyl ,(' f!.. tv",yl" r( ~y--
V~ r" I. 4 5' . ,Ii
'I (JI/17
r')
y (<C.' ~
i 1
'-.'
; .
0'\ 't: 0'\:.<::.(\ 0"co- ~().A...
1'\ 1,.j~:S ('1'1
('L ~
1\ t..J -f
J- (y\--,,_.L., 0 f f;-c c:
, ,
.)k, 'S: ~ -f f k' t ,'F '1 f- ,.fr (~.c i""'P,_:,,-- i-
f'(). (-(;1:;- '- t-"" -
\ l Q C.>.- 4.. "" c.". '\ ,.<.yt... .- .
i
, '
L'-'A.R
('\ '-;)
VC'0 T<~ \- '-' t)
~,.t1-"lWV Do.. \ 4-~,- <-,--, ( ( oJ S fYlu.. 1<-.... 'ct i-
.,If, - ,J
,~y f1,ef--t( (' \r I{'<:'_~ \.'- t t V-,-,,- (Y\?
, ,')
;.p, , / ,fe -:J ">
;r- fJ-...,: I " (...1 ~, r ~f U~,-.~N , r
, ;';/ C.{C{.:"S
. See
f:x-k~
5
~"""'-s.f
;)::5~ .-I(cx
C\
.L ./ ((. -. ,- ....... ~
l,
- <-- -<.r.'_ -f 1'-1 Co ~-' ,~h..,.,,-...-f::. ~(.
Ivto( ~ '?
CC ('~b/9~/
y~'{ ~ +:-Do--r +:s. 1- c:h'-r-(<o...(..,., :- L,-,A~
E/(:.: <7 0')1'7;.,.-(
-;:~e A;<-; /---
13......J. t"k ,-,L.<.~~_<;;-
. Ii. S
'J /"" __ /~ ~
f' I' -.~-: n rc,J..- '7~ 11' Co" (
-7\
j>-?.> /J t 1=
/ /' t'
'- c 17'-'"{'c.. h
C h--">"T'" """ ; ..... /~ i"J -::, -r- /
( '<f '1-<:: S':("I-~' -n (j~)
""7K rr::. '
:K'7frr; s;4t"'> ~ ;:':"1:
111~<7{'- C ~4c1.{e:: ';,..' fl"tl';l,<-. ('V' (<;'~L<.-{;-y.
J;fCJ;"'Y\0 - /(/~ fr~c K-s
.-or
/ i ;/ -
./t..'(,{....tCr.-,?l. -
/ltt ~ h~ fz. <.017-'. ~
j~L.....?f -(v c./< 5_< ;~c/~Q'. (6 ~<.;~ fk'~ 5>~.L._+(-.:-"..f.;_.
j J'
; r' uf j _ {.J-. ..;- {~/ -d!c/} t=F,"":> ~ r-)
Ull r y~', \I,; 'P'f/ Cc/.\ S~ 7 <:{., ( / ~--< / -) / :>.
r(~S (:(-fj 3' (f'" t.<.C<hnr jr-Lr(L f,c..~'_
/((
I/''' rfVc
EKc-/~inf
~ ?S5(}
I)?!> {?J2 fit ps.
q-O%
Ek;s-h~!T c-l;.. j___ 7hfJ;'c 7So ,co
1+"~r.5CQ )?r'j~c--I- ~'l17 t~ '? '1
c/;~r~1'1<< 711'
C v~~~ i- '?~o- K COLlY'.. -t- - 'i 37f"
A.~'>~ f<?~' -* I;{VC- - ~ /CJ2
~ J, /1'7'7 '
/ ~ror~f ir..fP." O/,iflJ-- 8'=
-f-o r~ I ,,~ cr 0c2
~m;i~~f cf Sl;7s ~K'7.tf
~ {2-1 ../:'17 ~ "
.:T "" 7 G-~, f- f;~
Cr;yst&-/' ~r-S~C/Yl;fs -
(c9?Vn;ts L&
="
a-$ r .t1--c. /2- S~
r~ mo-: Yl J.~ 71r'f 5
C': ~--c-J...;- 37 v2 -I-r/f' s)
I.s-, 4-
~B~ .,""
3?~
I'D 7t/ ~/ (:'~
plvS .1(0% ~;o-o - _ ~
d"rC-l ~s~-Ir7~
70~' ( ~oZ,3.<
-=
MrTtGrfrlcrV
KeJ~c<::. (s1c-~ r cS/-
G{(;Cc
307
~' '{- (- Jf?-?T
k
~~
(~d 0-.$3!in f"1~><- t-)
..;b~%",
(~ft d-SSf!:n"rn~f-)
ep~f 1t..2
--- 10 ~ }~;yd.C'-SS?n"'-"
:5 <7.2 -fr;}:>-5 ~ ~/
/3:2 frps eJve:r Lc~
i{~ rr/rs QVor {f!:) 5
~ .1(0 %, '~S-s .-jll/VF-v---f
- 7(,8.g-(r-'P-s .
= / .:l.S -fn'ps 6 V""< Lo..>
~
17.96 acres
15.91
14.05
3.33
8.64
0.5
14.18
Total 74.57 acres
Settlement indicates: 85.29 acres
Master P. indicates: 81.12
Less church parcel 14.18 acres
Density 45.62764
Density based on settlement acreage 7.585883
Density based on MP acreage: 1 7.9758381
Density based on MP acreage: 7.7786
(without duplex units)
Woolbright Place PUD
Density calculation:
ParcellTracUPod
Parcel "A",Tract "L" or Pod 2A
Pod 2B
Pod 1
Pod 3
Tract "B"
Tract "E"
Tract "F"
DENSITY CALCULATION
Total Acreage (MP)
In High Density class
In Moderate Density class
81.12 acres
9.12 a.cres
72 acres
.- / t- i c;:
57-'1'2
'7 &'\
, \
\-\ . \.
v
..
~
Units
252 apts
296 apts
83 sf
16 dup
""'" " "'-J
I
(
4,.' A,
c--(,- ;f~
fpr-
647 units
Less church parcel
10.41533 units/acre I
Density
Units
x
X
10.8 units/acre 98.496
7.26 units/acre -ozr.r2 '--. 7'
~) ? b' '{ It( ,77 __ --,.- /
Total Units Allowed r 621.2161~'!.~~~ 7
"
DENSITY CALCULATION
Using Total Acreage if Tabulated using Zoning/Land Use boundary, not Church Parcel Boundary (less 1.36 acres)
Density
o -
;& t'7s; q ca:.-lc.u4 '~~ /5
fhct'^- Ae- /Y7~;C;rn~ ~/
@ /<y) t- f,y r -Ii", d K~.J-flJ /fO <? s ft)>
C'C/'/(~'l -fry ~-~ -/~ ?/JU' ~~ of 5t'7c ,
Total Acreage
In High Density class
In Moderate density class
79.76
9.12
70.64
f"{8 ;5
X
X
98.496
512.8464
1 0.8 units/acre
7.26 units/acre
Total Units Allowed 1611.34241
k5S
~(
2><"'nSl<T
(
~/(L(
2;z~
f.Gy-'
'-)r I () )-L\
10 3, {,7 JIi ,785 r-..r
,0/' ~
v !"r'
~ L(7 - (f: f-r o/prC5v~' Oc ,-",J:~J c_,,'!.f.~A..:;...
1'- - ~ Vl~ c<J'o^'~(Y<--~~~
/0.
ck;~f,'i Un,-t- ~3 I - LV,oC'v+\y ~ ,.,s.'h~
l' ~ ~,~~ g't. \;2... ....<4"'"s
c ~V{'--- \", l L( · fa
.-,
.(~!!:!// ~ 'f'-.9c--." <,,-C, -lL o-c...~<:'<r----,3...33 "-U'- ,"---s
.,.~. /frPnN~ by ci~'ns.~...i.-
~ . I' ' ,'(
C::L<:".("~c:;. (f.:, ( ....:l
':3 ~~ . ,." C'~ ~nn, ~(.('2.)< (C..g).;;.
_. J..J .~ c.. ,-'" '-'.....!....e" "'. ,\.",- l
~~f\
:f-n
;
/
I
f'(\G"~--:>-~' "]:).- u<" tfJ- foft:.'f\ -f,'q....(
0-) (,r ...~",-f t ",(l '"'-
mr - I' Au
.",.,<fl{kJ J ("",_-f;~~ - ~ '31; u.-J.
'~? L/{\~f5
: (3_33 X. (iO~ R')
1L)
.~;,..,.
~ /4"Jr{/
~0/
/- /
"f/"
", . <(
"1.., .(6
/ ' "'1- /
;~~
;
,
I
~
~-
~) ~y ,~f\ ~;(-~ rf/;'-rL~ v.~.r--'!
<<.' r 'I ~'< ~, 10 # 8' ~J <<- :;
----;>-)L -*
7...,73 un/Is
-
<{' 150
'12/
~
J 1'1
/)1./
/
./
/D;2...
ih
176
~~b
'-
/52-.
_7(.: j~..
/L(1 - *~r
- '" ~ y fl/~~ a--!L
::. Cf.2. .1......
_ (.,3 / ~ c ;::.s,p~
'C2-
{,~ t~
~
(ft.! b
)
(S2-
i.)
(
---
16~O
TRAFFIC IMPACT (SW 8th Street only)
Current SW 8th Street Traffic
Project Traffic
6374
800 assigned
7174
830
8004
1874 assigned
9878
SubTotal
Addition of Crystal Key Traffic
SubTotal
Vested Traffic Remaining in peD
SubTotal
IMPACT REDUCTION (REDUCTION IN SIZE AND TRIPS)
Size
3 Stories
1 Story
2 Story
Sq.Ft
67500
22500
45000
Trips
2306.475
768.825
1537.65
[Ik -1. 5 ~ ("e .f ~<r-.f 0: i GO
,/
i? rt
{( {,.It:' b~j
{1 I~
?, 4.{, 'f
l'f I~'
- L('(f ~
tp~
Assigned
922.59
307.53
615.06
?
LOS Capacity (C/O thr is OOe) .-
2426 trips I
1626 trips
-1078 trips
APPLICATION TRACKING LOG
PROJECT TITLE: flItST 'BARIA'" CHYRCII Of BCYtNTON BEACH
FILE #:
LUAR 97-002
PROJECT LOCATION: 1/4 MILE n. OF INTERSECTION OF S.Ww.8TH St. at Woolbright Rd. on east side of S.W. 8th Ave.
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Land Use Plan Amendment/Rezoning
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED: (YIN) 0
AGENT: Ellen Smith
AGENT PHONE: 835-8505
DATE REC'D:
AMOUNT:
REVIEWER'S NAME:
ADDRESS:
FAX:
655-5525
RECEIPT NO.:
12 SETS OF PRE-ASSEMBLED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW:
2 OF 12 SETS SIGNED AND SEALED 0
SURVEY 0
LANDSCAPE PLAN 0
FLOOR PLAN 0
SITE PLAN WITH SITE DATA 0
APPLICATION/SUBMITTAL: DATE ACCEPTED:
DRAINAGE PLAN
ELEVATION VIEW DRAWINGS
COLORED ELEVATIONS RECEIVED
MATERIAL SAMPLES RECEIVED
PHOTOGRAPHS RECEIVED
o
o
o
o
o
DATE DENIED:
DATE OF LETTER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES:
DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER:
INITIAL 1ST REVIEW MEMO: DATE SENT: 11/6/97
MEMO NO.
97-541 RETURN DATE: 11/14/98
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED
\ UTIL.
.. P.W.
I... PARKS
FIRE
... POLICE
PLANNING
BUILDING
ENGINEER
FORESTER
DATE OF LETTER SENT TO SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS:
90 DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID:
DATE 12 COMPLETE (ASSEMBLED) SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2ND REVIEW:
PRE-ASSEMBLED PLANS SUBMIITED FOR REVIEW:
AMENDED APPLICATION 0
2 OF12 SETS SIGNED AND SEALED 0
SURVEY 0
LANDSCAPE PLAN 0
FLOOR PLAN 0
SITE PLAN WITH SITE DATA 0
2ND REVIEW MEMO: DATE SENT:
DRAINAGE PLAN 0
ELEVATION VIEW DRAWINGS 0
COLORED ELEVATIONS RECEIVED 0
MATERIAL SAMPLES RECEIVED 0
TRANSPARENCY RECEIVED 0
PHOTOGRAPHS RECEIVED 0
1:J./5'
MEMO NO.
RETURN DATE:
2nd REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED
UTIL.
P.W.
PARKS
FIRE
POLICE
PLANNING
BUILDING
ENGINEER
FORESTER
MEMO# DATE
BOARD MEETING DATE:
BOARD:
LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY. DATE SENT / SIGNS INSTALLED:
DATE:
CITY COMMISSION: DATE:
DEVELOPMENT ORDER RECEIVED FROM CITY CLERK: 0 DATE:
DEVELOPMENT ORDER SENT TO APPLICANT: 0 DATE:
S:\FORMS\TRACKING LOG FORM
revised 4/25/97
,
MEETING MINUTES ~ ~
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
J
..
JANUARY 6, 1998
Motion
Commissioner Jaskiewicz moved to approve the request for annexation, the amendment of the
Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan from MR-5 in Palm Beach County to Low
Density Residential, and to rezone the property from Agricultural Residential (AR) in Palm
Beach County to Planned Unit Development with a land use intensity of 4.0 (PUD with LUI=4.0)
to allow for 98 zero lot line, single-family homes, subject to staff comments. Commissioner
Tillman seconded the motion that carried 5-0.
Mr. Perry reported that he has a long history in the City of Boynton Beach. He complimented
staff and said this has been his best experience working with the City.
B. Project: Item #1 /' First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach (LUAE
/~ 97.(02)
Item #2 Woolbright Place PUD Master Plan Modification
/(MPMD 97.(06)
Item #3 Woolbright Place PUD Land Use Amendment
(LUAE 97-(04)
Unruh-Smith & Associates
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach, Boynton Beach I Ltd.
Partnership, and Boynton Beach II ltd. Partnership
Woolbright Place PUD (east and west sides of SW 8th Street, one-
quarter mile north of the intersection of SW 8th Street and
Woolbright Road
Description: Request to amend and rezone a 14.18 acre parcel within the
Woolbright Place PUD to change the existing approved use from a
church to a health care campus
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Attorney Cherof administered the oath to all who would testify during these proceedings.
Ellen Smith. DeveloDment Planner with Unruh Smith & Associates. represented the
applicant. She thanked staff for their professionalism in keeping the applicant on track during
this Comprehensive Plan process. She further thanked the residents of Leisureville who met
with the applicant on Friday. In response to that meeting, the applicant revised the site plan.
Copies of those revisions were distributed to the Commissioners and are attached to the original
set of these minutes on file in the City Clerk's Office.
Ms. Smith referred to Page 3 of Planning & Zoning Division Memorandum No. 97-596 that
provides excerpts from the City's Comprehensive Plan. This. is a transitional, moderate-impact
site plan that will respect the neighbors. The project meets concurrency and will maintain the
character of the surrounding community. Adverse impacts on the natural environment will be
minimized. This project meets the first goal of the Comprehensive Plan.
With respect to infrastructure, this proposal will not change any of the water or sewer lines
currently in place. There will be no impact on the school system, park system, or drainage
system of the City. The Traffic Circulation Element requires the project to maintain Level of
Service C or better on daily and peak-hour conditions on roads such as SW 8th. Since
13
. <
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 6,1998
Woolbright Road is a County roadway, they set the Level of Service. This project is well within
the limits of the Traffic Circulation Element as it relates to all of the roads.
This project has been designed to be sensitive to the commercial activities and residential
community bordering it. The project has all of the characteristics of a mixed-use project, and is
appropriately located. The commercial portions of the project are quiet. There are day impacts,
but there is no noise, odor, or early or late hours. It is consistent with the character of the
surrounding area. Higher densities are not being proposed. This project will not change the
character of Lake Boynton Estates. Lake Boynton Estates is one-quarter mile north of this
project, across a five-acre preserve and a 12-acre retention area that is permanent open space.
In addition, it is across a four-lane divided highway. The Vinings Apartment Complex is
adjacent to the residential portion of this proposed project. The Vinings is 16.8 units per acre.
There are 13 beds per acre in this proposed project.
The First Baptist Church purchased this property for their future church. When the church was
proposed, deed restrictions ran with the land and the surrounding area. Those restrictions
would not allow certain uses to be built within close proximity of the church. Those deed
restrictions have expired, and some of those uses have been developed. The church no longer
feels this location is appropriate for their use.
This project is compatible with the scale. It is across from the Shoppes of Woolbright. There
have been suggestions to develop this property as residential. The traffic vested for the church
is approximately 750 trips per day. This figure equates to 75 homes. Seventy-five homes on
14.8 acres would be a density of 1.9 units per acre. The applicant does not feel 2-units per acre
is logical on this property. If the applicant decided to develop a project similar to the Vinings, he
would be over the traffic proposed. In addition, it is felt that this location may not be appropriate
for residential since it is very close to commercial. Ms. Smith urged the Commission to support
this proposal.
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director, advised that staff recommends denial of this
request for two reasons. The primary reason for denial is traffic and the increase in the number
of trips this project will generate beyond what is vested for this parcel.
Level of Service C is our adopted Level of Service. Southwest 8th Street is a local street. Palm
Beach County is not required to review it, nor do they have standards available for such a
review. Level of Service is lowered with the number of traffic lights and stop signs. Staff
concurs with the applicant about the daily trips. A count taken during peak indicated 6,374 daily
trips per day. Staff has reduced that number to an average of 6,102 daily trips. Staff used a
table that indicates that the threshold for Level of Service C for this road is 8,800. This project
will be over the threshold for Level of Service C by 432 average. trips per day.
The office building is the major traffic generator of this complex. It generates approximately
80% of the overall trips. It is a three-story building. If that portion of the project was reduced by
one floor, it will still be over the threshold for Level of Service C by approximately 125 average
daily trips.
The second reason for denial is we have seen an inundation of ACLFs and nursing homes over
the past year, Some of them have been approved and others have gone through a number of
14
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 6,1998
time extensions. In reviewing the Comprehensive Plan, we have filled our demands for this use
in our area.
Ms. Smith explained that Level of Service C is a range, and everyone has a different way of
defining it. The City's Codes do not define Level of Service C. One of many definitions
available defines it as 8,800. The applicant's traffic engineer does not believe the level of traffic
for this project meets the City's Level of Service C considering the formula the applicant was
asked to use.
Rob Rennebaum, a registered Professional Engineer with Simmons & White Engineers,
has been performing traffic engineering for approximately 15 years. Eleven years have been
spent doing this job in Palm Beach County. Mr. Rennebaum is a member of the Palm Beach
County Access Management Task Team, serves on the Palm Beach County Traffic
Performance AppealS Board and is a member of the National Institute of Transportation.
In the original staff report prepared for the Planning & Development Board, the numbers
indicated that the applicant would be over the Level of Service. Staff has agreed with Mr.
Rennebaum's number of 6,100 trips. The staff report indicated the number staff felt was
approved but not built. Even though those trips are not on the road, staff felt they should be
considered. The applicant did consider those trips along with the trips associated with their
project. The applicant also considered the trips that would travel north on SW 8th. The original
report assigned 20% of the project trips north. When Mr. Rennebaum prepared his report, he
was conservative and assigned 40% of the project trips north. He also dealt with the number
that was approved, but is not built. Mr. Rennebaum was able to show that the applicant was
under the most conservative way of looking at Level of Service C (8,800).
The confusing issue involves the fact that Level of Service C is a range. County standards do
not apply. The applicant must use the FOOT statewide standards to establish Level of Service
C. This is based on number of signals per mile. Level of Service C is 15,000 at 2 ~ signals per
mile. At 2 ~ to 4 ~ signals per mile, the figure is 8,800. Signalized intersections per mile are
figured by length link. It is one mile from Woolbright Road to Boynton Beach Boulevard. DOT
mandates that each signal at each end be counted as one-half of one signal. This amounts to a
total of one signal for this area. Therefore, the applicant is dealing with a link that is one mile
long with one signal (following DOT standards). Therefore, Level of Service C would be 15,000
in the one-mile range.
Staff indicated that the project was over Level of Service C by 432 trips. That figure is based on
2 ~ to 4 ~ signals per mile. That is not the appropriate table to use to analyze this link.
Although it appears clear that the table to be used should be 15,200, stop signs must be
considered. There are two stop signs on this link. Mr. Rennebaum stated that Level of Service
C for this road is somewhere in the range of 15,000 and 8,800. DOT does not have a Clear
table that includes calculations when stop signs are involved. Level of Service is based on
delay in travel times. Stop signs cause delay and reduce travel speeds and travel times.
However, they do not have the same effect as signals. Mr. Rennebaum feels staff
reinvestigated what is approved but not built and determined that amounts to 400 ~:o 500 trips.
Mr. Rennebaum stated that he was very conservative in his calculations by using the worst table
that was available (8,800). In a worst-case scenario, Mr. Rennebaum's report indicates the
applicant would be a few trips lower. As an expert, Mr. Rennebaum does not believe this
project will cause SW 8th Street to go over Level of Service C.
15
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 6,1998
Bulent Kastarlak, Director of Development, feels the size of the medical building is equivalent to
a hospital. This facility alone is 67,000 square feet. This is not a neighborhood type of medical
facility. He does not feel this site plan is sensitive to the quality of the environment in this area.
In addition, he pointed out that the road narrows to two lanes just a few hundred yards north of
this project. This will present a traffic problem.
Mr. Rennebaum stated that his entire discussion was based on the two-lane roadway - not the
four-lane roadway to the south.
MAYOR TAYLOR ANNOUNCED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
Following is a list of people who spoke in opposition of the proposal. Their concerns focused on
the traffic that would impact their neighborhood.
Margy Lenhertz
Steven Scott
Gary Lenhertz
Neal Smith
Daryl Green
Robert Clark
Stanley Olsen
Howard Brown
Robert Hahn
Susan Hahn
Jose Aguila
Tom Mathis
619 SW 2nd Avenue
215 swath Street
619 SW 2nd Avenue
220 swath Street
645 SW 2nd Avenue
744 SW 1st Court
106 NW ath Street
732 West Ocean
746 West Ocean
746 West Ocean
aoo sw 1 st Court
731 West Ocean
Ms. Ellen Alexander, 604 Canal Way, expressed concern about the three-story medical building
that was proposed.
Following is a list of people who spoke in favor of this project. They support the sale of this
property since they feel a church use is no longer appropriate in this location. Furthermore, they
wish to remain in the downtown area of Boynton Beach and be part of the revitalization of the
City.
Bud Meadows
Dave Edward
Dorothy Von
Gary Brandenburg
Cliff Melear
Ann Wemiss
Lee Wische*
200 SW 12th Avenue
1360 SW 27th Place
334 SW 11th Avenue
Law firm of Carlton Fields
312 SW 11th Avenue
6760 East View Drive, Lantana
1302 SW 1ath Street
*Mr. WisGhe submitted a letter of support from Clyde Heisinger, President of the Board of
Directors of Palm Beach Leisureville Community Association, Inc. The letter is attached to the
original set of these minutes on file in the City Clerk's Office.
16
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 6, 1998
Greg Kino, attorney with Boose, Casey & Ciklin, and representing Woolbright PCD and
Howard Scharlln, advised that the property owner has not breached the covenants. There was
a five-year time period that prohibited certain uses from being constructed. That time period
has expired. The only use that was inconsistent with the covenant was the drive-through. With
respect to traffic, Mr. Kino reminded the Commissioners that his client is vested for a certain
amount of trips and square footage. No further road improvements will be necessitated by his
applicant's projects, and his client will not provide funding for any road improvements that might
be necessary in the future if approval of this project results in the total amount of trips exceeding
the amount of vested trips.
Mr, Kino explained that the City has told his client he cannot exceed the amount of vested trips
for his project. The applicant has felt that would be possible if he could meet the adopted Level
of Service on the roadways. The church is now doing that by going beyond 750. In the event
his client has a user that will exceed the vested trips, they will proceed under this same type of
scenario as long as they meet the Level of Service. .
Mr. Kino's client is not opposed to the proposed uses. However, he does not expect the buyer
to object to any future retail or commercial type use his client proposes.
Mr. Kino was somewhat concerned that the applicant would withdraw from the cost of the
drainage maintenance. However, he realized that the applicant has agreed to remain within the
maintenance association and pay their fair' share of drainage. He requested that the
Commission consider this as a condition of approval of this project.
WITH NO ONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK, MAYOR TAYLOR CLOSED THE PUBLIC
HEARING.
Ms. Smith addressed some of the concerns mentioned by the residents.
. For the purpose of proceeding, Ms. Smith agreed with staff on traffic Level of Service and
definition. The applicant will accept 432 average daily trips which equals a reduction of
12,650 square feet off the medical building.
. The applicant feels this parcel is a good location for the CLF and an offer is imminently
expected if this proposal is approved by the Commission.
. The proposal is well beneath the lot coverage percentage allowed in this area. Only 28% of
the lot will be covered.
In response to Mayor Taylor, Ms. Smith said she did not agree to eliminate one story of the
medical facility because that would amount to 33,000 square feet. However, they will reduce
the square footage of the facility. .
Commissioner Jaskiewicz did not feel this particular project would cause the truck traffic
concerns expressed by the residents. The people who will be served at this ClF will probably
not be driving during peak hours. In addition, most medical facilities close by 5:00 p.m.
Commissioner Jaskiewicz likes the mix of uses proposed in this project, and the fact that time
frames will not coincide with traffic from The Home Depot. Commissioner Jaskiewicz suggested
that the applicant consider construction of a right-turn only out of the medical complex. This
would reduce the amount of traffic traveling north on SW 8th. She further recommends that staff
investigate solutions to the traffic problems in this area, perhaps by constructing a loop road
17
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 6, 1998
along Morton's Way. Commissioner Jaskiewicz agrees with staff that the medical office building
is not acceptable with respect to size. It should not exceed two stories. She would want a
commitment that if this project is approved, that it will be built on that property within a specified
period of time, or the zoning would revert back to its current zoning designation.
Vice Mayor Titcomb realized that the problem with this petition was the ongoing negative
impacts on the neighborhoods to the north. He recommended that staff investigate the
possibility of abandoning SW 8th Street past the conservation area up to Ocean Drive, and
dedicating it to a public park. By doing this, the traffic problem would be solved. In order for
Vice Mayor Titcomb to support this project, he would like the office building reduced to two
stories to guarantee the reduction of traffic trips. He feels this project is compatible with
surrounding uses. He requested that a solution be found to the traffic problem that will impact
the neighborhood to the north. If that problem is solved, he will support this petition.
Commissioner Bradley agreed that the traffic has increased a great deal since the road was
opened approximately one year ago. He requested that staff comment on Vice Mayor Titcomb's
suggestion to abandon the roadway.
Commissioner Tillman was in agreement with Vice Mayor Titcomb's remarks. In addition, he
feels the biggest issue is the size of the middle building. A reduction in the size of that building
would gain his support for the project. He also agreed that something must be done about the
traffic problem in this area. He pointed out that traffic would be generated regardless of the
project that is developed on this property. He will support this project with a reduced size
medical facility.
Mayor Taylor said he would not support abandoning a major road in this City because he does
not see that as a solution to the problem. While he understands that there are problems
because of increased traffic, he realizes those problems will be exacerbated as the remainder of
the property is developed. He suggested that the applicant consider funding speed humps on
SW 8th (right off Boynton Beach Boulevard) when construction commences. These speed
humps will deter people from using the roadway. He will support this petition if the medical
facility is reduced to two stories. He agreed that staff needs to look at ways to deter traffic off
SW 8th Street.
A new resident of the area recommended that Ocean Drive at SW 8th to Boynton Beach
Boulevard be changed to a one-way roadway to eliminate traffic in this area.
Ms. Smith agreed to reduce the number of stories of the medical facility to two. However, she
requested that the size be allowed within the allotted traffic capacity. That number is
approximately 54,000 square feet which is a reduction from-the originally proposed 67,000
square feet. The applicant agrees to fund speed humps concurrent with issuance of CertifiCate
of Occupancy. The applicant has explored the possibility of having the medical facility closest to
Cracker Barrel. Although it would be less efficient than having it in the center of the site, the
applicant would be willing to move that facility.
David Cheer, Planner/Landscape Architect and President of Seminole Bay Land
Company, said the building was placed in the middle of the site because it is the major traffic
generator. It was important to keep the traffic close to the intersection. In addition, an effort
was made to save as many existing trees as possible on the site.
18
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA
JANUARY 6. 1998
When Ms. Smith suggested this was a trade-off for the right-turn only lane, Mayor Taylor
advised that this would be addressed at site plan.
In Ms. Smith's opinion, the proposal is a good use of the property. However, it will come back to
the Commission if any other project is suggested in the future. She recommended that the
expiration of the Comprehensive Plan and rezoning request be tied to the life of the master plan.
Ms. Heyden explained that the life of the rezoning is 18 months. If it is not acted on within that
time period, it will revert to the original zoning.
Commissioner Bradley asked for residents' input with respect to the installation of speed humps.
Jose Aguila said he is not an expert on speed humps, and is not certain they are legal. He
supports the closing of the road to through-traffic. He reminded the Commissioners that if this
project is approved and the applicant exceeds the vested trips for the project, this would open
the door for other developers to require the same treatment.
Attorney Cherof pointed out that there were a number of issues discussed during these
proceedings that were not incorporated in the conditions of approval, the comments of staff, or
comments of the Planning & Development Board. In addition, the applicant spoke of conditions
they are amenable to. A number of questions were posed, and staff should have an opportunity
to investigate and report back. Attorney Cherof recommended tabling this item to provide an
opportunity to review the record so that all conditions can be documented and staff can have the
opportunity to respond with respect to the issue of speed humps and road closure.
In response to Mayor Taylor, Mr. Kastartak advised that staff would be ready to provide a
response with respect to the issues of speed humps and road closure within two weeks.
Ms, Heyden said clarification is needed with respect to the height of the medical facility. It was
her impression that the Commission wants the facility reduced in size to two stories. That would
result in the reduction of 33,000 square feet. However, the applicant's offer to reduce the
square footage equates to the number of trips they are over the threshold.
Ms. Smith advised that this would equate to the 432 average daily trips that staff says exceed
Level of Service C on SW 8th and Ocean. A reduction in the building of 12,650 square feet will
achieve consistency with the City's Level of Service. That is what the applicant would like to
build at a two-story level.
Commissioner Bradley explained that the Level of Service is. still questionable. He requested
that the numbers be aunched to remove the entire third story while still keeping the same
footprint. That would amount to a reduction of 33,000 square feet.
Ms. Smith said that would more than exceed what is required by the Plan. Ms. Smith will
provide the traffic savings at the next meeting.
Mayor Taylor felt this discussion could take place when the applicant comes back at the next
meeting.
19
i>
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 6, 1998
Motion
Vice Mayor Titcomb moved to table this to the next meeting as per the City Attorney.
Commissioner Tillman seconded the motion that carried 5-0.
Mr. Aguila confirmed with Mayor Taylor that public input would be accepted at the next meeting
with respect to the findings - not to rehash everything that was discussed at this meeting.
Michael Morton, Woolbright Place development, said he is not opposed to approving this
project, but he would be vehemently opposed to the closure of swath Street. The shopping
center was planned dependent on the fact that the street goes from Woolbright Road to Boynton
Beach Boulevard. The City cannot usurp his right to use that street in order to put 2,000 more
trips on the road. He still has 157,000 square feet left to build. This proposed project is adding
67,000 square feet of retail that amounts to a 40% increase. There will be a lot more traffic on
swath Street that was planned for and approved. The City cannot close sw.ath Street.
Mayor Taylor said he tried to point out that fact earlier in the meeting. He reminded everyone
present that the next City Commission meeting would be on January 20, 199a.
MAYOR TAYLOR DECLARED A BRIEF RECESS AT 9:50 P.M.
RECONVENED AT 10:05 P.M.
VIII. BIDS:
THE MEETING
None
IX. DEVELOPMENT PLANS:
None
X. NEW BUSINESS:
Item B was addressed first while awaiting the return of the City Attorney.
B. Authorization to amend agreement for professional services with Bryant, Miller &
Olive
City Manager Willis advised that there is an increasing trend in the public sector to hire an
interest in Tallahassee to represent us while we go through the Legislative Sessions. Our
experience with the school was a shining example of something that we probably would not
have had any luck on without an extraordinary intervention effort in Tallahassee. Private sector
lobbying efforts with millions of dollars to spend on issues on behalf of special interest groups
are pushing every year for exemptions to governmental regulations and associated fees. These
items have a significant budgetary impact on municipalities that sometimes result in millions of
dollars in unfunded mamjates.
The telecommunications industry is trying to exempt itself from governmental regulations over
siting of poles and related equipment in public rights-of-way and from the payment of associated
licensing fees. This legislation, if successfully passed, would directly result in an immediate loss
20
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 22, 1997
to rezone the property from Agricultural Residential (AR) in Palm Beach County to
Planned Unit Development with a land use intensity of 4.0 to allow for 98 zero lot line,
single-family homes, subject to all staff comments, and subject to Cypress Mulch not
being used. Mr. Aguila seconded the motion, which carried 7-0.
Mr. Perry thanked Ms. Heyden and her staff for their assistance.
4,
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location::
Description:
See discussion below.
5.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
See discussion below.
B. Subdivision
Woolbright Place PUD
Unruh-Smith & Associates
Boynton Beach I Ltd. Partnership and TCRDAD
Vinings at Boynton Beach II Ltd. Partnership
The east and west sides of S.W. 8th Street, one-
quarter mile north of Woolbright Road
Request to amend the Future Land Use Map of the
Comprehensive Plan from Moderate Density
Residential to High Density Residential.
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
Unruh-Smith & Associates
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
The west side of S.W. 8th Street, one-quarter mile
north of the intersection of S.W. 8th Street and
Woolbright Road
Request to amend the Future Land Use Map of the
Comprehensive Plan from Moderate Density
Residential to Local Retail Commercial and to rezone
the property from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to
Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to allow for
a nursing home, medical office building and an adult
living facility on 14.18 acres.
Master Plan Modification
1.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Woolbright Place PUD
Unruh-Smith & Associates
Boynton Beach I Ltd.. Partnership and TCRDAD
Vinings at Boynton Beach II Ltd. Partnership
9
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 22, 1997
Location: The east and west sides of S.W. 8th Street, one-
qlJarter mile north of Woolbright Road
Description: Request to amend the Woolbright Place (PUD)
master plan by removing from the PUD a 14.18 acre
parcel originally approved for a church.
Ellen Smith of Unruh-Smith & Associates advised that City staff recommended denial of
the plan amendment for the commercial designation for the 14 acres. Staff also
recommended denial of the master plan amendment. The proposal is to extract 14
acres from a larger PUD for the purposes of developing a health care campus. In order
to accomplish this, they had to file three different applications with the City. These three
applications are before this board this evening. The first application would extract 14
acres from the overall 81 acres of the Woolbright Place PUD. It would also alter the
density of the remaining land. This is necessary for two reasons. First, the existing
Comprehensive Plan density on the Woolbright Place PUD is incorrect. What exists on
the ground, as approved, is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan density, This
application fixes that. This application also exacerbates the density inconsistency
because it removes some land, and the inclusion of the property effedively dilutes the _
density of the existing PUD. Therefore, by taking this land out, density goes up. They
are not adding a single home, a single trip, or a single unit to the Woolbright Place PUD.
The second item before the Board requests a Comprehensive Plan and rezoning
designation of commercial on the 14 acres that have been extracted from the
Woolbright Place PUD, and the third application requests approval of a medical care
campus consisting of a nursing home, a congregate care facility, and a medical office.
Ms. Smith stated that the project is consistent with the code and the Comprehensive
Plan in terms of the first 12 objectives. She addressed Objective 1.3 of the
Comprehensive Plan and said it discourages sprawl and promotes compact urban
development. She stated that this project is not sprawled. It is in the heart of activity of
Boynton Beach. It is not in the downtown, but it is in town. This same objective
encourages planned mixed use projects that are sensitive to the surrounding area. She
stated that this project may not be mixed use, but it has that same sort of synergy and it
is a planned development with the medical office facility being able to service the
nursing home and the ClF. Another part of what makes the synergy of the project work
are the people who come into the ClF as married couples and then one of them begins
to require a higher level of care. They could co-exist together with skilled health care
professionals in the middle of the site. In addition, the majority of this project is adjacent
to intense commercial uses. The least intense portion of this project is placed as close
to a neighborhood as possible. The ClF building is on the northwest corner of the site.
10
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 22, 1997
Objective 1,6 requires that uses within districts be compatible. The ClF, the nursing
home, and the whole health care campus component are compatible witt' the
neighbors. These types of uses are permitted even in the moderate and higher levels.
With regard to Item 7.A.5, page 4 of the staff report discusses some other goals and
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Objective 1.17 seeks to minimize land use
conflicts. This project is a great transition from the intense commercial uses to the
south and to the east of the Shoppes of Woolbright and the Woolbright Place pce to a
rather dense residential project and a little less dense residential project here.
Therefore, it is a wonderful, appropriate transition. It is a use that is quiet in the day and
has only daytime impacts associated with the medical office building. The people in the
ClF and the nursing home will not leave the property as frequently as other residential
uses. It is a similar institutional use as what is already approved. It will not impact the
school system. It is not an outdoor-ariented residential facility, which makes it
consistent with the character of its neighbor to the west and leisureville. There are no
extended hours of operation to make this inconsistent. They have designed a situation
that minimizes any potential land use conflict with regard to the neighbors.
Objective 1.17.8 states that proposals should maintain the character of existing single-
family neighborhoods by preventing conversion to a higher density. This application
does not affect any density of any surrounding single-family development. In fact, the
density of the proposed ClF portion is less than the density of its neighbor, the Vinings.
The single-family neighborhood referred to in staffs report, the Lake Boynton Estates
area, is about a quarter of a mile away beyond a preserve area. The water tract to the
north is designated as a water preserve tract. Therefore, a tremendous buffer exists,
and it is across a four-lane divided highway. They believe it is quite compatible with
what is around it and in no way will affect an existing single-family neighborhood.
The Comprehensive Plan states that any proposal should improve the character of the
surrounding area. They believe this proposed project would be a terrific buffer between
many of the homes in Leisureville. She pointed out that Leisureville has complained
about the noise and odor associated with the Cracker Barrel Restaurant. She also
pointed out that vacant land does nothing to put a buffer in place. The proposed
buildings and the landscaping would make a good impact.
The Comprehensive Plan also discourages commercial uses except where access is
great and impacts on residential uses are least. The same objective advises the use of
buffering and minimized impacts. This property is terrific for a health care campus
because the access is so great and the population is dense around it. There is
acceptable access to the major arterials and expressways of the community to serve a
use like this. The proposed landscaping for this project exceeds the code. The
proposed design minimizes impact, uses buffering, and has commercial uses where
access is appropriate.
11
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 22,1997
The Comprehensive Plan also states that new commercial should be placed on infill
parcels or on specialized land that has specialized locational or site requirements.
Because of the population demographics that surround this use, this is a specialized
location for this type of use and this proposal meets that criteria.
This proposal is quite consistent with the area around it and will not create an isolated
zoning district. It is related to the adjacent district and no special grant is being
requested.
When the First Baptist Church purchased this parcel, it came along with a document of
restrictive covenants placed on the land. The spirit of that was that certain uses are
incompatible with the church, 'such as the sale of alcohol and tobacco. Since then, the
gas station facility was built and includes the sale of those items. Therefore, there is a
change of conditions.
Ms. Smith addressed whether or not the proposed rezoning is compatible with the utility
system, roadways, and other public facilities. She stated that the staff report discusses
the potential impact of this project on S.W. 8th Street, which runs along the eastern
border of this property. She advised that they meet Countywide concurrency and local
standards for local roads. The Comprehensive Plan states that developments should
meet Level of Service C. She pointed out that Level of Service C is a range from 8,800
to 14,299 trips a day. She submitted an excerpt from the Department of Transportation
with regard to the standards of Level of Service. The people in the nursing home will
not drive. The people in the ClF may drive on occasion. The bulk of the traffic
associated with this project would come from the medical office building, which is not
necessarily a peak use. Southwest 8th Street is an appropriate place for this use.
There is an 80 foot right-of-way and a four lane divided road. The traffic count
associated with level of Service C on a four lane divided road is 31,000 trips a day.
The 8,800 trips a day is the beginning of Level of Service C for a two lane section of the
road. She advised that the traffic counts were taken last week and pointed out that this
is the week before Christmas when the roadways are crowded. These uses are low
traffic generators. Typical uses in commercial districts generally are higher. A retail
center that could be built on this property would total about 240,000 square feet of
space and would have twice the traffic.
Ms. Smith stated that they are compatible with the scale of the neighborhood. The
density is about 12 beds an acre and the Vinings' net density is about 16. A elF and a
nursing home should be close to a residential area to minimize the feeling of emotional
segregation from the rest of the world. She believed this is an appropriate use of this
land and requested approval of all three il,ems. She submitted a letter from the
President of the Palm Beach leisureville Community Association in support of this
project.
12
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 22, 1997
Mr. Aguila asked if the property owners in Leisureville were notified of this or if the
Board of Directors took it upon themselves to speak for the entire community.
Chairman Wische advised that he met with a group of residents in Leisureville and they
were concerned about how close the proposed project is going to be to three homes on
Canal Way (702, 704 and 706).
Mr. Aguila stated that he did not know enough about this project until last week to form
an opinion. He wondered how the Board of Directors of Palm Beach Leisureville knew
enough about it to write a letter of support on December 8th.
Mr. Rumpf stated that from information that was collected by the Palm Beach County
Traffic Engineering Office, 8,800 trips is the upper end of CD. CD is the transition from
C to D. The County does not comment on local streets or impact on local streets.
Therefore, a traffic impact statement or summary is not going to address impacts on
local streets. Staff had to evaluate its own impact. They requested that trips be
counted and the County obliged and did that technical work. He pointed out that in
1986 when the original master plan was established, staff voiced some concerns about
traffic impacting the area north of the project. With regard to the road being two lanes
or four lanes, it converges into two lanes prior to the northern extent of the project. The
right-of-way is designed as a local street. The County does not have the data to review
a local street. It is performing, by their definition, as a collector road, based on proximity
to intense uses and the volume of traffic. He stated that staff needs to clarify the upper
threshold of the C limit.
Chairman Wische asked if the traffic threshold is at its capacity. Mr. Rumpf said it is not
if you include the current developed status of the environment. However, if you include
vested trips (those trips that are destined for the roadways once the approved square
footage is completed), it would exceed its capacity. There are still over 9,000 trips
vested or approved for the master plan that are yet to be felt on the roadways.
Mr, Myott wondered if these items should be tabled in order for staff to check its
calculations.
Ms. Heyden advised that the City does not have a Traffic Engineer on board and has
not had a Traffic Consultant on retainer for over seven years. Palm Beach County has
been doing the City's reviews. However, this is a local street and they have nothing to
do with it. City staff did it on their own as best they could and used information that they
thought was correct. However, she felt the bigger issue is that the City fathers and the
taxpayers had an agreement regarding what would be tolerated with regard to
development of PUDs and PC Os in terms of traffic. She stated that this project was
evaluated under outdated standards. Even at that time and under those standards, we
decided to accept that traffic impact on the Lake Boynton Estates area. In her opinion,
13
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 22, 1997
the Lake Boynton Estates neighborhood is the most impacted by this application. They
are the ones who are going to feel the traffic. They are feeling it now and staff receives
complaints all the time. This parcel is vested for 750 trips per day. This application
would almost triple those trips per day. Realistically, that road cannot be widened. The
right-of-way would be involved and homes would be impacted. She questioned who
would pay to widen the road. If it were widened, it would impact the neighborhood. The
increase in speed and the four lanes would ruin the homes that front on that roadway.
This project would increase the number of trips.
She felt the board also needs to consider the other parcels that are not built. She stated
that commercial uses are more appropriately designated to areas centered around
collectors and arterials. Southwest 8th Street is clearly a two-lane local street from one
part of the project northward. It is not a place to be further encroaching a commercial
neighborhood.
With regard to the comment Ms. Smith made about Cracker Barrel, Ms. Heyden advised
that this project is part of the peo, which has a higher level of expectation in terms of
designing the master plan for that commercial project. There is a greenbelt buffer
between Cracker Barrel and whatever the use on the church parcel ends up being.
She stated that you need to trade off any commercial application against what is already
allowed in a PUD. There are other uses that are not specifically approved in the master
plan but are allowed under that zoning, such as multi-family. They can market a
minimum of 103 units on that property to make it viable. For that type of use, you would
be within the vested trips for the church and there would not be any increase in traffic on
S.W. 8th Street to the north.
Also, the limits of the project are not just in front of the project. In terms of traffic, there
is a radius of influence and you need to consider properties to the north that would be
impacted. Contrary to the original study, people use that roadway as a cut through to
get from Boynton Beach Boulevard to Woolbright Road. Therefore, not only is traffic
generated by what is there and what is planned to be there, but additional people are
being attracted to that area to get to where they want to go faster. She advised that
staff received two letters from residents of Leisureville who were concerned about noise
and lighting.
Bud Meadows, Boynton resident and property owner, stated that he is a State Certified
Building Contractor and Deacon Minister of First Baptist Church. He has been a
member of the church for about 12 years. He spoke about the restrictive covenants.
He read the following from a document: uSpeaking for the Congregation, we believe
that certain uses of adjacent property are incompatible with the proper functioning of a
church." The list below that included any place that would sell alcoholic beverages, a
lumberyard, a restaurant with a drive through, and an automobile service station. This
14
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELO"'MENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 22,1997
was an agreement that the church thought they were locked into 10 or 11 years ago
when they made the last transition of properties with the former owner. Half the items
set out in the restrictions are now present on the adjoining properties. This is why they
are before the board this evening. The rules have changed and things are different
since the church purchased the property. He requested help from the board in rezoning
this property because they did not believe a church belongs there any longer.
Dave Edwards, Pastor of First Baptist Church, said he and Unruh-Smith & Associates
met with the Board of Directors of Palm Beach Leisureville, showed them the plans, and
asked them what they thought would be beneficial to Leisureville. The Director and four
other members of the Board of Directors thought the proposed project was a great idea.
In addition, the church is committed to staying in the downtown area. They plan to build
a 600 seat auditorium as a worship assembly and to beautify its property to enhance the
community. He urged the board to approve this project.
Greg Kino, Attorney with Boose, Casey, and Ciklin, represented Howard Scharlin,
Trustee, for the Woolbright Place Joint Venture. He stated that the applicant is not in
breach of the restrictive covenants. He explained that certain uses were set out when
the church initially purchased the property. Those limitations were for a period of five
years and expired in 1995. They had five years to build the church and if they did not,
they felt that it was appropriate that their hands not be tied with the use of their property.
With regard to the traffic situation, his client still has 157,000 square feet of retail
approved and vested for the pee and will be coming forward with an application shortly.
He did not have any objection to this project as long as the traffic does not impact his
client's ability to proceed with the build out of his project. He did not have any objection
to the medical office, ClF I or nursing home. However, he pointed out that his client is
vested for retail and would not want this applicant to claim that it is inconsistent with
their quasi-residential uses. With respect to the drainage, he requested that any
approval be conditioned upon the applicant paying his share of the drainage costs,
which was contemplated from day one.
Margaret Roberts, 112 S.W. 8th Place, said she was not aware of any meeting until a
leaflet was put on her door this afternoon. The Board of Directors of Palm Beach
Leisureville never called her about her opinion. She lives a few feet from the two-lane
road and there is constant bumper to bumper traffic. She complained about the noise
from the cars and the cutting through to Home Depot, the gas station, and Woolbright
Road.
Attorney Gary Brandenburg of Carlton Fields represented the church. He stated that
the church is an excellent corporate resident and has supported the City for a long time.
They had plans to move their church facility. In the 10 years that ensued, things clearly
changed that were adverse to their plans, which are reflective in the covenants. Even
though they are not applicable anymore, they showed what the church's intentions were
15
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOP~ENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 22, 1997
then. This is an opportunity for the board to help a church that is helping to revitalize
the downtown area by allowing them to pull the funds out of this property to enhance the
downtown area. The proposed plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the
zoning code.
Hazel Wayman, 703 Canal Way, stated that this project affects more than just three
homes. She asked if an entrance is going to be made into Leisureville for the traffic and
if the electric high wires will be relocated, She also inquired about the landscaping.
Mr. Aguila advised that there will not be a road from this property into Leisureville.
However, the impact of what happens on their property will be affected at the
intersection of Ocean and 8th. Therefore, traffic would be able to enter Leisureville.
In response to a comment from a resident of Leisureville, Ms. Smith advised that the
water retention area to the north of the property will remain. It is designated by plat as a
conservation area. The electric poles will be relocated, but she did not know where they
will be relocated. She stated that there is a possibility that they will go underground.
David Cure, Landscape Architect and Planner, advised that he designed landscape
along all the buffers. There is a 25 foot landscape buffer continuously around the
project. That buffer is expanded by green space, which is adjacent to the buffer. In the
narrowest portion of the landscape buffer, there is a total of 80 feet of green space (25
feet of landscape buffer and about another 50 plus feet of green area, some of it with
easements, etc.). With regard to the buffer, he intends to use a mix of native shrubs
that can be maintained anywhere from 4 feet to 10 feet. The buffers will be much
thicker than the buffers at Cracker Barrel. The materials will be tolerant and there will
be clustered Palm trees and flowering trees. The buffer will attract wildlife and will be
beautiful to look at from both sides. There is also going to be a fence. He was
considering using vinyl-clad chain link and incorporating it into the landscape planting so
that it disappears within two to three years.
Chairman Wische advised that this board's decision is not final. It is a recommendation
to the City Commission, who will make the final decision.
The attached letter from Ray Phelan, 707 Canal Way, was read into the record.
At this time, Chairman Wische introduced the Director of Development.
Claire Friedlander, daughter of Minnette Deutsch who resides at 604 Canal Way, felt
this proposal, with modifications, could be an asset for this particular parcel. She
suggested that the applicant provide a specific site plan indicating the location of any
dumpsters and the delivery areas. She also suggested that approval be conditioned on
16
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELO~MENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 22, 1997
aromas and sounds emanating from the property not going beyond the boundaries of
the property.
The attached letter from Allan Silver was read into the record.
Ms. Friedlander concurred with Mr. Silver's comments about the buffer. Also, she
advised that the members of the community were not officially notified that a meeting
was being held with the applicant. Nor was there any notification in the Leisureville
newspaper that is circulated to every resident. Today she was told by office staff at
Leisureville that on the advice of counsel, the Board of Directors was told that they
could not take a position.
Julia Galcznski, 602 S.W, 8th Place, concurred with Ms. Friedlander that the residents
had no contact with the office of Leisureville.
George Bailey lives in Leisureville and advised that a Board of Directors is elected every
year to represent the residents of Leisureville. The residents have faith and confidence
that they will examine and analyze issues of interest to them. He was confident that
they have talked to the people who they needed to in order to form an opinion.
Mr. Myatt asked if there is a contract pending on the sale of this land relative to this
development proposal. Ms. Smith stated that there is no contract for sale pending on
this property. However, they have been in contact with a developer for the potential
purchase of this site.
Mr. Myatt asked if they have done any studies to determine if this is the highest and
best use for this property. Ms. Smith advised that a market study has been performed
for a eLF nursing home to be developed on this property and the market is quite strong.
This is an appropriate use for the market as well as the surrounding community.
Mr. Myatt asked how the sale of this property might affect the present church property
and benefit the downtown. Pastor Edwards advised that for some time, the church has
been working on a master plan for the downtown facility and the property that it owns.
They are in the process of purchasing the homes in their area in order to own the whole
block. They plan to build a new sanctuary in the area and to revitalize that area. They
will be investing the proceeds in the downtown area.
Mr. Friedland felt this was a clean industry, least offensive, would not hurt the
surrounding residents, and could be a profitable experience for the entire community.
Ms. Frazier felt this was a good location for a nursing home and medical office.
17
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 22, 1997
Mr. Dube stated that about four years ago this board approved an ACLF and has since
granted two extensions. but it has never been built. The board recently approved one
on Congress Avenue and Golf Road. The one on High Ridge has recently been
expanded. He was concerned about ending up with too many ACLFs.
Chairman Wische pointed out that the people who are migrating to Florida are mainly
elderly. He did not think there could ever be too many ACLFs. He pointed out that the
ones that are managed correctly have waiting lists. As you get older you need
assurance of a place to go.
Mr. Aguila did not support this project. He stated that he lives at the second set of stop
signs and nobody stops at them. Ever since this road was opened, the amount of traffic
generated from the two lane road going to Boynton Beach Boulevard has been
incredible. He wondered why the church had not voiced its objections at the time the
gas station and Cracker Barrel came in. He felt that this particular proposal is not the
only thing that can solve the church's dilemma. This site could be sold to a residential
developer and can go to medium and high density. The owners can get their money out
of it and do the improvements that they want to do downtown without having a negative
impact on the traffic on S.W. 8th. He wondered how Cracker Barrel, RaceTrac, and
Home Depot feel about pulling this out of the PCD.
Mr. Reed did not support this project. He stated that just because the church wishes to
withdraw from that property doesn't mean it has to automatically be rezoned. There are
compatible uses that can be made with the property that will also protect the citizens of
Leisureville and the surrounding areas and will not impose the traffic penalties and other
penalties that adding a commercial facility in this area would do.
Mr. Friedland stated that the City is growing and you cannot stop growth. He felt there
was plenty of "pie" for this industry and for bringing taxes and additional jobs into the
community. He could not think of anything cleaner to put in this area other than private
dwellings. However, private dwellings do not provide jobs.
Motion on Item 7.B.1
Motion
Mr. Aguila moved to deny the request to amend the Woolbright Place (PUD) master
plan by removing from the PUD a 14.18 acre parcel originally approved for a church.
Mr. Dube seconded the motion. A roll call vote was polled by the Recording Secretary.
The motion failed 3-4. Messrs. Aguila, Dube, and Reed voted aye.
18
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOf. .JlENT BOARD MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 22, 1997
Motion
Mr. Myott moved to approve the master plan modification for the Woolbright Place PUD,
Item 7.B.1, subject to staff comments. Mr. Friedland seconded the motion. A roll call
vote was polled by the Recording Secretary. The motion carried 4-3. Messrs. Aguila,
Dubs, and Reed cast the dissenting votes.
Motion on Item 7.A.5
Motion
Mr. Aguila moved to deny the request to amend the Future Land Use Map of the
Comprehensive Plan from Moderate Density Residential to Local Retail Commercial
and to rezone the property from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to Planned
Commercial Development (PCD) to allow for a nursing home, medical office building
and an adult living facility on 14.18 acres. Mr. Dube seconded the motion. A roll call
vote was polled by the Recording Secretary. The motion failed 3-4. Messrs. Aguila,
Dube, and Reed voted aye.
Motion
Mr. Myott moved to approve the Land Use Amendment and Rezoning of the First
Baptist Church of Boynton Beach, Item 7.A.5, subject to staff comments. Mr. Friedland
seconded the motion. A roll call vote was polled by the Recording Secretary. The
motion carried 4-3. Messrs. Aguila, Dube, and Reed cast the dissenting votes.
Motion on Item 7.A.4
Chairman Wische asked if the applicants agree to the one staff comment. Ms. Smith
answered affirmatively. She stated that her prior comments apply to this as well, except
that most of the traffic will go directly to Woolbright Road.
Motion
Mr. Myott moved to amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan from
Moderate Density Residential to High Density Residential, Item 7.A.4, the Woolbright
Place PUD I subject to staff comments. Ms. Frazier seconded the motion, which carried
5-2. Messrs. Aguila and Dubs cast the dissenting votes.
Chairman Wische declared a recess at 9:31 p.m. The meeting resumed at 9:39 p.m.
19
JUL-21-98 TUE 12:3~ p~ J~RUH,SMITH&ASSOCIATES
F~"-"iO. E813E55525
p, 02
-.....-.
. ~II "---I'-IC-=-=,-I II U~~UH. ~i\'lITH & ,15S0Cl~TES
I,'Jl UI:I'Uh .1 III \
, P:Julie Po!icy :W(j Slr~ll'sic rl~Jlnil1g
, L;m<J lI~c ;;I~d 7.0"dil~ 1\1,llLcrs
, J.~Sb:<lli\'c Rcgu!J.ol)' ALl:on
· Go".:rnIllClli RclJlions
. PI'i'~.lli7.;lUO,l IS~li~:i
VIA FACSIMILE: 561-315-6259
JUly 21, 1998
Mr. Bulent Kastarlak
Director of Development
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
RE: First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach: Second reading of Land Use
Amendments
Dear Mr. Kastarlak:
On behalf of my client, First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach, this letter is to
inform the City that we agree with the staff report regarding the referenced
item. Due to vacation schedules, no one from our firm will be able to attend
tonight's adoption hearing.
,Because we are in concurrence with the staff reportt we respectfully request
that the City consider and adopt this item tonight. If, however, there are any
questions we respectfully request that the item be postponed until someone
can be in attendance to represent the item.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
Very truly yours.
L U.!"'N C. 0M rTf-I J RYLSfc
Ellen C. Smith, AICP
105 SQULl N~rCi))u~/\\'c.1Je · SJilC SC3 '\V.:~l f'a:n' Bt.l(:'. floriC<l33401 . SC,I.335-8SC5 . rOlX: 561.655-5525
-~. -
.>,' TTf~ U\{~IL)q~Hf,:\))UnI,Es.
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
, ~UN-25-98 THU 0::47 PM
UNRUH,SMITH&ASSCCIATES
o AX NO. 5616555525 IoJ m
WeSt Palm emh. FL ] W
~ 2~1993
t;nruh, Smilh & Assocb~cs
105 Somh Narcissus Avenue Suite 503.
Dale:
G .-' 'J-!J/ q. fl
~U1110cr of pages i:l:lucing cc\.cr sheet:
!L
FAX
T\>:
I
From:
cJf\tt $ ~~
UlUuh. Smith &. Associates
Phone:
(
(
)
) )1-~/ (p~4
Fhcne:
(561) 835-8505 ~
(561) 655.5525
Fax phone:
Fax phone:
cc:
'Ix:
f(~ f.
/)O~
t
~C4 ~?;,
,. Fer Jour review 0 Reply ASM!
C:'(r( V. ';;~r U-vvtJ. . ~
r ll' P'tY" '~
II (C ... crfi iN ~I \
t-0V \~ l
rtkls
tOAIL
:REMARKS:
o Urgcn~
o Please comment
-'
cD(~
THE INFORMA TlON TRANSM/TTED is PPW1LEGED AND CONFIDENTfA!.., /T IS SOLEL Y FOR THtE REVIE:.W ANC USE OF THG
NAMED RECIPi~Nr. ANY OTHER REVIEW OR DiSTRIBUTION OF THIS COr.1MUNICATlON IS STRICTLY PROHIBrTED. IF
YOU I-fA.VE .f:?ECE1VED THIS TRANSM.rTTAL IN ERR':JR. PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER IMME:DIATELY B'y TELEPHONE.
:UN-25-98 THU 01 :47 PM JNRUH,SMliH&ASSOC!ATES
FAX NO. 5616555525
p, 02
RE: Response to ORC Report on proposed COlnprehensive Plan Amendments 98-1
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach (LUAR 97-002)
Woolbright Place PUD (LUAR 97-004)
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me Monday June 24~ 1998, to discu:s:s rectifying
the issues raised in the ORe report for the two land use amendments referenced above, Two
issues need to be resolved. The first is the need for an adequate public facilities analysis
based on maximum development potential of the proposed designations. The second involves
the City's lack of intensity standards for Local Retail Commercial in the Comprehensive Plan.
To resolve the first issue, I have prepared an itemized public facility analysis for the LUAR
97-002 amendment using the City's adopted Level of Service standards. Plcase reference
attachment "An, This analysis includes the demand created by the existing uses, an
estimation of the maximum demand created under the new land use category, and the actual
demand that will be created with this project. I have included a copy of the traffic report
completed by Rob Rennebaum which clarifies the projects adequacy pertaining to roadway
LOS on SW 8th St.
In instances where the demand for services for the proposed project exceeds the existing
demand, i.e. water, sewer, confirmation of service availability has been confirmed with the
appropriate provider. Although the increased traffic demand is within the City's LOS
standard, access and traffic calming measures have been incorporated into the plan to
minimize impacts.
Because the LUAR 97-004 amendment represents property that is already developed, and
because the amendment makes no changos exc.ept to the total aceragc of the property, a public
facilities analysis would be immaterial. Sufficient facilities are already in place to adequately
provide for eKisting community,
Resolution of the second issue is related to the fiut in understanding that the City
Comprehensive Plan provides for maxilnum intensity levels in the City's Code, The City
Comprehensive Plan references maximum intensity standards,
"Subsequent to Plan adoption, modify the land development regulations
to provide that the maximum floor area ratio in non-residential land use
categories shall be limited by the maximum lot coverage, the maximum
height, and the parking, landscaping, and stormwater retention
requirements contained in the City' 3 Code of Ordinances." (Policy
1.16.3)
This provision makes it important to note that the public facilities analysis done by the City
for the First Baptist Church amendment is based on the approved uses and intensities.
Determining the mix of uses and maximum intensities allowable under the Local Retail
JUN-25-98 THU 01 :43 PM JNRUH,SMITH&ASSCCJATES
~AX NO, 5818555525
p, 02
Commercial designation is not appropriate due to the fact that the Comprehensive Plan
delegates these to site specific Code requirements. To mitigate against creating a deficiency
in the City LOS standards, assure compatibility with the residential neighbors, and to ease
traffic on adjacent roadways, the following restrictive intensity standards were made
conditions of the Plan approval (deed restriction, rezoning, and master plan approval) for this
project:
. A 34,300 SF~ 120 bed nursing home
. A 67,500 SF, 60 bed CLF
. A 39,700 SF, medical office building
. Any uses other than those listed above will require City Commission approval
. lncreased landscape buffers, perimeter fencing, and setbacks
. Installation on traffic calming devices on SW 8111 St., as requested by the City Engineer
A health care campus would be an appropriate and compatible use for this location, which
will also serve as a suitable buffer between the surrounding residential and commercial uses.
Due to the inability of another designation to allow for this type of facility, the Local Retail
Commercial designation was sought, and approved, subject to the previous conditions. The
intensities for this project are set forth in the Master Plan which was approved simultaneously.
::f'..'i. ~o, s'tWl-J)~"J(..".J
}\\R\)~' sn \i~.\lSSCC 1 ~ '\Co
i\l\\-2S-IlB ,\I\) W ~o, HI
\%\
\l~\
\~~i
~~
So
~~
TQ'i
<
t~
;..l~
~~
~~
~~
-Q
~ .<A
%!
'~~
~o .-.
'0
.op.
~
n~
~'e.
'la'11l
't}~
.~ Q
. it o'd
~~
2 V$
~.P
.... d>
~ ....
~~
~ en
.,...,~ Q
~~.~
orA
?<o
-oo~
~ o~~
.~~ ~
~..... 0
ou..;;.!
.~~ ~
~~ ~
~ .'(:l.
.~ i 'J{l
~~.a
~t)~
~.~ ~
~~l
'6-i~
~~\I)
?l:1~
\~i
~ oS ~
:r...... -d
~ C 0
.~ (f', 1$
v..oQ
~ ...-'. ~
.~ ...... '"
e ~ t$
%~ a
.~~.~
e ~~
~ rJI 'e
o ~-o
C1 0 u
.s,.~ IP
~~';)
.~~1
~ct..o;.
1>. .-l'~
""'~'?
Q) ~
t) e....
t'$ 0. "'
~oQo
~ -Q \<:l
~~U
I/< Po ...,
~
\)
b
,$
~
~
'~
-0
~
\~
~
.s
1n
g
o~
~
......
~
""t
~
~
~
~
~
"'Zl
'l
c.
\10
\[",
\~A
C\
'A
~
~
~
\
'S ~
~ ~
~ ~ %
.~ 0 C
8. ~
~...... t--"
; \ ~
~ t b
e. ~ ?
M. ~ ~
~ ~
'e ~- ifl
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~\ ~
~ \u,~ ~
S; .~~
\~
~
'I;""
'G
~
(is
~
o
%.
,i;O!
~
~
\0-'
1
.0
1
~
~
\)
~
~
....;
2
~
~
v
'i
"&
...
~
~
9
'is
Q#
:% .~
~ ~
~ ~.....
i/) .~ -0
""'" :3 ~
'a .~ A
\~ ~~
1) ~ .~ s
~~ ~.""~
-oOQ""~
~~~~t
~.%~~e
Q...g'~ 'Eio ~
~,e. :;;) '5 ~
~~~v e:
~gll~
~ t-..~ Q ~
~~;,..<\O?"
....
...
"*
~
\l'"
~
~
~
\i)
~
......
~
-a
~
~
't
~
b'
.-
i
~
~
-d
~
f
'It
-~-----------._-
------/._~-
f ----
JUN-25-93 THU 01:49 PM
JNRUH,SMITE&ASSOCIATES FAX NO.
I. 5618555525
(tr\t~~\N,~~,rt r-
MEl\10RANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 97 - 380
l~C': '~ "f':5~lW
PlANMNG AN!)
ZONING DEFt
TO:
DATE:
Daniel DeCarlo, Planning Department
John A. Guidry. Utilities Directo~~
November 14, 1997
FROM:
SURJECT: First Baptist Church, LUAR/Rezoning 97-002
In reply to your memo dated November 6, 1997, we can state the following:
1. \Vater and sewer utilities are located adjacent to the parcel in the S. W.
8lh Street right-of-way; and
2. Those fac.ilities are adequately sized to meet the maximum demand
allowed by the proposed land use classification.
I trust this letter meets your needs. Please refer any additional questions on this
matter to Peter Mazzella of this office.
JAG/PVM
xc: Skip Milor
File
-- ---- .--.--------
JUN-25-98 THJ 01:50 PM UNRUH,SMITE&ASSOCIATES
FAX NO. 5619555525
P. 06
, Il'
SIMMONS & WHITE, INC.
Engineers · Planners . Consur~ants
Jar:.uary 5/ 1998
City of Boyr-ton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
At:.ention:
Mr. Michael Rumnf
Senior Planner ~
1<.e:
Woolbright Place P.U.D. Revl3~on
city of Boynton Beach, Florida
Dear Mr. Ru:npf:
The purpose of this letter is to respond to the 'Staff Report
com~ents regarding traffic for the above referenced project,
specifically the evalua:.~on of S.W. 6th S~reet.
The first step in the evaluation of this roadway is to determine
the roadway capacity. T~e Palm Beach County Unified Land
Development Code Traffic Performance Standard establishes the
capacity of two lane roadways based on Level of Service liD" and the
Florida Departmen:: of Transportation Ge:leral:.zed Annual Average
Daily Volumes for Flo~ida's Urbani~ed Areas Class Ib (2.5 to 4.5
signali~ed intersections per mi:e). The following s~mmary for 2-
lane and 1-1ane roadways applies:
Class rb (2.5 to 4.5 siqnalized intersections per miJet
Level of Service "D"
Lanes
Caoacity
2~lane
4-1ane
14/300
31,100
It is my understanding tha~ Staff has de>;ermined that a tr.ore
str:..ngent Level of Service "C" Standard applies to S. W. 8th Street.
The Level of Service IIC" capacity will vary based on the number of
signalized intersections p~r mile. The following sumwary of the
Florida Dspartment of Transportation Tables for Level of Service
"C" applies:
4623 Forest Hill Boulevard. Suite 112. West Palm Beac~, clcrida 33415
Telephone (561; 965-9144 . Fax (56~) 965-0926
JUN-25-98 T1U 01 :50 PM JNRUH,SM!TH&ASSCCIATES
~AX NO, 5616555525
p, 07
Mr. Michael Ru~?f
Janu3ry 5, 1998 - Page Two
teve~ of Service "C~
Lanes
C:'ass Ia
(0-2,49 s~gnalized
Intersections per mile)
Class Ib
(2,5 to 4.5 signalized
Intersections oer mile)
2-lane
4-lane
15,200
33,3:>0
8800
19,200
The llnk 0: S.W. 8th Street from Woolbright Road to Boynton Beach
Blvd. is O:1e mile in length ar.d signalized a': each end. The
terminal sig:1als at the link's end each equate to one-half of a
signal for the purposes of utilizing the F::'orida DepartlT.ent of
Transportation Tables. This one mile long :ink therefore has one
signalized intersection per mile and Florida Department of
Transportation Table Ia should apply with a Level of Service "C"
capacity 0: 1~r200 vpd.
In-field 24-hour traffic counts were per:or~ed by Palm Beach County
Engineering Traffic D~ visio:1 on S. W. 8 th Stree:: 0:.1 the 2-1ane
sectio:1 so~th of West Ocean Drive and the 4-1ane divided section
r-orth of Woolbright Road. The counts were performed on Decerrber
12th and 16th, respectively, and should be factored to ref:ect an
average unnual volume. The Florida Dep3rtment of T=ansportation
1996 Peak Season Factor Category Report is attached with this
letter. A seaso:1al adj ustment of approximately 96% and 95%,
respectively I was applied to the t.....o counts to obtaln average
annual counts:
Count Count Volume Adjustment A.A.D,T.
Locatio;) Date Factor
South of Ocean 12/ :2/ 9"} 6374 vpd 95.7% 6102 vpd
North of
Woolbright 12/:6/9'7 6697 vpd 94.7% 6344 vpd
Addir.g the project traffic and anticipated traffic from the
approved but unbuilt por~ions of the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD (as
calculated in the Staff Report) to the above AADT volu~e south of
Ocean, the 2-1ane portion of S.W. S~h Street is anticipated to
operate within Level of Service "ell capacity for beth Class Ia ar.d
Class Ib of the Flor~da Departmer.t of Transportation Tables:
AADT Volu~e south of Ocean
Project Traffic
Shoppes or Woolbr~gh: PCD
=
6102
800
1874
TOTAL 8766
15,200
8800
:::
Class Ia L.O.S. IIC~
Class Ib L. 0 . S, II C II
JUN-25-98 T1U 01 :51 PM JNRUH,SMITH&ASSCCIATES
rAX NO. 5616555525
P. 08
Mr. Michael Rumpf
January 5, 1998 - Page ~hree
The stop s~gns en S.W. 8th Street at Oce~n Avenue and S.W. 1st
Co~rt are not considered signalized intersections under the Florida
Department of Transportation Generalized Tables. Under the most
conservativ~ methodology of considering the stop signs as
signalized intersections, however, the Class Ib Level of Service
'Ie" Standard 0: 8800 vpd 'Would apply ar.d the project would still
meet the City's S~andard.
In summary, the proposed project's net ~~pact on S.W. 8th Street
hae been estimated at 800 trips per day. With the addition of
project traffic, this lin~ is anticipated to operate well within
the City's Level of Service Standard. This project therefore meets
the City and Cc~nty Standards with rega~d to tra=fic performance.
! f you require any addi tional informat ion to revise your Staff
Report favo:::-ably, please eal:' ;r.e directly. I am available to
respond i:r,P.'lediate2.y to your concerns. Thank you very much for your
help with this matter.
Sincerely,
INC;:.
RFR/jp
rumpf
96-87
Enclosures
cc; Mrs. Ellen smith
JUN-25-9S T1U 01 :51 FM JNRUH,SMITH&ASSCCIATES =AX NO, 5616555525
VOLUME ~e:PCf':a
lu~e Re~ort wit, 24 Hour i is Page 1
********~*~*~~**~**~***~~*~********~*~~****.**~~***~*~*~**~~***************~~~~
Dala File D12t1001.PRN
Stdtion 000000000001
Idpntification 000000000013 lnt~rval
Start date Oee t1, 97 StArt time
s.t.o~ d<:l;t.e DflC 12, 97 Stop tirlte
City/Town CAR County
Location ~~6TH ST 400' S OF OC~AN AVE (88)
*********.~*************~*.*~*~******~~~***~****.******~~***~****************~>>
Dee 11/0ec 12 Northbound Volu~e for Lan~ 1
15 minutes
11:15
11:15
P.8. COUNTY
p, oe
End Time
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10
11
15
30
45
00
Hr Total
co
11
7
13
13
44
01
16
02
5
4
5
?
15
03
4
4
4
3
O~
1
1
2
1
5
11
05
3
o
2
b
16
06
2
1
9
4
14
16
27
07
~.
...
16
33
36
47
08
43
56
49
64
212
09
50
47
39
67
203
210
52
60
55
53
6C
31:
5~
6::'
62
132
21~
---------------~--------~-----------------~----------------------~-------------
22
2:::
Ene Time
15
30
45
00
12
58
5S
sa
40
H'( Tot.al 211
13
53
56
S6
69
234
14
60
;4
66
57
237
1S
S8
70
7S
99
302
16
86
79
78
75
318
17
92
70
92
60
314
18
50
59
40
31
160
19
43
37
41
34
155
20
21
34
37
28
120
21
26
25
26
32
109
111
34
41'
17
13
21
lE
11'
H
---~----------------------------------------~----------------------------------
7;
24 Ho~r Total 3508
AM p~ak hour begins : 11~30 AM peok volume: 229 Peak hour fector : 0.9)
PM peak hour begins: 15:45 PM peak volume: 342 Peak hour factor : O.Bt
~**x*~***************~********~*~********~********~*~*****.~*******~*********~~
Dee l:/Oec 12 Southbound Volume for Lan~ 2
End Time
-------------------------------~-~------------------------------------------~--
10
l~
15
30
45
00
Hr Total
00
20
01
8
5
4
3
0'2
?
o
:2
.
..
5
03
4
1
1
o
E:o
04
1
1
1
o
3
05
o
1
4
4
9
16
0&
4
3
4
5
12
12
39
40
07
44
52
5'1
84
239
oa
64
62
57
51
234
O~
48
39
42
54
183
156
37
31
40
48
3:
:3:
SE
4:
103
16'
End Time
-------------------------~---------------------------------------------~-----_.
22
2:
15
30
45
00
~2
59
39
52
43
Hr Total 193
13
36
36
49
38
159
14
€.3
51
56
56
226
15
43
50
42
57
192
lb
65
45
56
50
216
17
54
46
4A
54
1913
18
52
4~
36
'36
166
36
35
21
30
17.4
19
20
21
21
1Q
16
16
72
19
13
14
3
1,
28
22
23
17
90
1<
I
---~----------------------------------------~~--------~-----------------------_.
49
a'
. .
24 Hour Total 2866
AM peek hour begins: 07:30 AM ~eak volume; 269 ~eak hour faetor : 0.8'
PM peak hour beg (ns : 14 ~ 00 PM peak l.iolwne; 226 Peak hour factor : 0.91
*~***********~~~**~**~*~*~*~*~*~**~*~~~~~~***~~******~~*~*~~~******~******.***
?1'i.1
~ " 1 ~
r ..", "'~ J
;;r~:/3_') .- {; I ()2 I), D~ -7':
.' . , 1~ TOPL J
, ~
JUN-25-9S THU 01:52 PM JNRUH,SMITH&ASSOCIATES
FAX NO. E616E55525 P. 10
,r<;. TT ~ ~ _ oJ
PAL.,. BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC ENGI.,'::ER[NG
VOLUME REPORT
Vol~me Report with 24 ~o~r Totals Page
**~~*~*~*********~****:t.****~****~***~*******~***~~*~*~**~****~*******~***~***'
Data ~ile D1215001.~RN
Station 000000000002
Identification 000000000013 Interval
Seart date Dee 15, 97 Start time
Slop date Dee 16, 97 Stop tim6
City/Tololn CAR County
Location S~ 8TH 5T 500' N OF WOOLBRIGHT RD
*******~**********~**********~**~*****~~~~~*~~****~***~**x~*******~**~*******~
Dee lS/Dec 16 Northbound Volum& for Lane 1
15 minutes
11:15
11:15
P.6. COUNTY
--------------------~~--~~~------------------------------~------------------_.
F.:nd Time 00 01 02 03 04- OS 06 07 08 09 10
---------
15 7 3 5 1 2 1 :) 19 29 36 40
30 7 2 3 0 2 1 4 16 33 39 54 (
4& 1 1 2 0 1 '1 11 28 33 45 39
00 5 3 2 0 1 3 11 29 45 44 51 l
--------
Hr Total 20 9 12 1 f:, 6 29 '92 140 164 le4 2:
----------~------------------------------------------------------------------.
E'ld Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
- -------
1S 70 67 71 77 79 97 84 5l 44 40 15 -
c
30 61 64 69 6(, 79 79 85 40 32 28 16
45 74 69 79 6~ 76 93 64 44 28 1.15 17
00 70 71 56 69 76 92 70 37 32 15 24
--------
Hr Total 275 271 275 27q 310 361 303 172 136 9$ 72
-----------------------------------.~-----------~----------p------------------
24 Hour Total 3514
AM p~ak hour besins : 11:15 At'1 peak volume ; 250 Peak hour factor ~ 0.1
PM peak hou ,- begins : 17:00 PM peak volume : 361 Peak hour factor : 0.<
**~*******~~**~*******~****~**~*******~J~~*~*~*********~*~***~********~*******~
Dee lS/Dee 16 Southbound Volurne for Lane 2
~----------~~-----------------------------------------------------------~----~
end Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
--...,.-----
15 3 3 8 ;) 3 2 21 54 91 54 ~1
30 5 5 1 '2 3 5 15 69 71 43 40
45 J 2 '2 0 0 10 34 75 St S7 47
00 2 3 4 '1 5 14 43 113 75 4& 52
--------
Hr Total 13 13 15 6 11 31 113 311 2e8 200 180 l'
-----~------------------------------------------------------------------~---_.
End TIme 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
--------
15 35 60 ~7 57 58 4S S7 17 22 20 26
30 56 59 56 47 50 29 42 32 21 26 21
45 43 75 47 74 46 46 37 29 20 15 14
00 68 55 63 56 50 47 34 18 25 29 14
-------....-
Hr Total 202 249 213 234 204 16>7 170 96 88 90 75
-----------------------~------------~--------------~-~-----------------------
24 Hou~ Total : 3183
AM peak hour begins : 07:30 A~ peak volume: 350 Peak hour factor
PM peak hour begins: 12:45 p~ peak volume: 262 Peak hour factow
~*******~******~***~~****~**x*~***~~***~~~~****$*~**********~~*******..
I .. .f17
l" ,) ·
I G 1""' ,.- ,
'J :' ,/~,;- ,. ;;) ~>~~: \ ._,
. _._~-~'
\ ' .;!::.
/ ,", 1'/
.,~ :+
" ......1 I
j -
h-
JUN-25-93 THJ 01:52 p~ JNRUH,SMITP.&ASSOCIATES
FAX NO. ~616555525
1996 P.ak Season F.~~or e.t~gQr.y Report
.C"tecrOJyl 1301 ,N..M .E~cH CSN~
~i.-' .\0 1...95' MOCPI C .95
W..k DOte!8 If' PIer'
_w_..~....~.~.....&~=.=........._~._.__.....8S~5.C....a.......c....~~Ea.........
.. 1 01/01196 ~ 01/0~/9' O.~5 1.00
w 2 Ol/Q7/~S - 01/1J/5G O.,? 1.02
- J OJ/16'96 ~ 01/20/S6 O.~8 1.03
.. . 01/21/" - 01/27/96 'c.n 1.02
· 5 O~/28/96 w 03/0)/'6 0.'6 1.01
.. 6 02/0'/~6 - 02J101$' D.9S 1.00
~ 7 OZ/Jl/96 - 02/17/" 0." O.~P
... 02/18/96 - 02/2&/96 0.'4 0.99
· J oa/25,,6. 03/02/96 0.94 O.,V
~10 01/03/P6. 03/09/96 0.9. 0.99
.11 03/10'" - 03/16/96 0.95 1.00
~12 01/17/". 03/~3/J' 0.'5 1.00
*13 O~/2'/96 - 03/30/56 0.96 1.01
14 O)/~1/9' ~ 04/06/96 o.~s 1.01
. 15 04/07f~6. 06/13/9' 0.91 1.02
l' 04/14/96. 04/20/P6 0.P7 1.02
17 0./21/96 - 04/27/96 O.~8 1.03
18 O./~.'96 - 05JO~/i60.99 1.0.
19 05/05/96 - 05/11/9' 1.00 1.05
20 oS/~a/~6 - 05/1./96 1.02 1.07
21 05/~gft6. c5/25/9G 1.0a 1.07
22 OS/26/96 - 06/01/96 1.03 l.oe
2i 0&/03/96. 06/08/96 1.03 1,08
2 05/t1,,,6 - OGI!S/96 -l.04 l.Oi
2 06/16/96 - C6/2_/~' .1.05 ~.10
26 o6/aJI'6 - O~/2i/9& .}:D6 1.11
27 oeno/u - 0'7/06/96 . .06' 1.11
~8 07/07/96 - O'/13/~' .1.07- 1,12
29 '01/14/g~. 07/201Sli 'l.DS' 1.13
JO 07/al/~' - Q7/~7/9~ '1.07- 1,1~
31 07/38/'6 - 08/03/11' '1.06" ..t' 1.11
.12 oe"oH~6. 081l0/S16 '1.05' 0" 1.10
33 08/11196 - 08/17/96 . 1.04- \, 1.09
34 08/1e/" - 08/341'6 '1.0!' 1.10
3S OB/25/'~ ~ 08/}1/~a .1.0S' 1.10
36 OP/Ol/5~ - Q~/Q7/96 '1.06- 1.11
37 09108/96 - 09/14/96 1.06' 1.1:
38 OP/15/P6 - Q~/al/9' 1.0" 1.12
39 09/22/96 - 09/28/96 t.os' 1.12
40 09/2~/9G - 10/05/9' .~04 1.0~
41 lO/O&/9ti '~,"Ofl21U 1.0~ 1..07
~2 10/13/96 - 10/19/'6 1.01 1.06
43 lD/20!'G - 10/26196 1.00 1.05
44 10/~7/96 - 11/02/90 1.001.05
45 11/03/~6. 11/09/9' 1.00 1.0S
46 11/10196 - 11/16/96 0.99 1.04
47 11/17/~6 - 11/23/96 0,98 1.03
~9 11/~4/96 - 11/30/96 0.98 1.03
4' l2/01/g6. 12/07/96 0.01 1.02
so 13/0e/" - ~2/1./g6 0." -4 l~l
S1 12/1S/911. 12/21/96 0.95 -4 1 00
52 13/221'~ - 14!2a/96 0.J7 1.02
53 13/29196 - 12/31/'6 O,ge 1.03
· Peak Se..Qh
7~7')}L 53. /5
--
5'3 WE Ek.'S
, 6691
-----.
(0- 002 !:3)
,Itf~ J.,
637'1
( 1.~o9:f3)
P. 11
-
-
~ ~ if'! ,4 PI
~ 6/02
/JIJ~
/'1 I
'.
;::
1,00'2- r?3
A 1/(:<- v.,,:,, :, ~ /1 ~.
.. - ( ", . c;.,nh..., "Y'7
2?wFZB.18" 17108112.17
'JOl~PX9EASON.TXT
. .. . '", ~. )':.', ."!:.' . - ~. .....;,~.. "'; ,'. ", .
JUN-25-93 THJ Oi:53 PM
UKRUH.SMITE&ASSOCIATES
FAX NO. 56i8555525
p, 12
. . ~
. J
TABLE E. 1
GENERALIZED ANNUAL AVERAGE p~r~r VOLUMES FOR FLOIUOA.'S
URBANIZED AREAS.
l>..
STAn TWo.W",y ARTDJ.U.5 FIlU.W"YS
lJNJNTUIUJP'IU n.ow Crnp I t",iIIIill .tlJ..iucl 'R' ower $OO.QOQ .....Ia.oi.. ., or puaill~
..~ 51lUJa of tic ,.,...". cj)' _1nI buau-a. clial1illl)
tI.....II~ .' ~l 0( Scrrir;IJ
Level or Service 1.- /II, B c D E
.~ A B C D € . 2U)O '''''- 52,900 67,000 "'.100
. 2Ultdi... 1,900 13.900 1t.900 ~4,lIDO 3',100 6 )).100 n.900 ?t.. 1 00. 600 , 16.lJOO
. Div. 2\ .suo 3~.1OO ~.too flQ,100 1UOO , 44.100 ~"OO sq',900 114.100 169.2GO
6Dlv. 32,20:) .53.700 75,200 1lO.2OG 10'l.400 10 ~S.zoo &a.2OO m..oo 167.700 211.400
12 ~,%lI() tQl.IOO 1$ t.?OO 19UOO Z4(Uoo
IN'nQUI"fU) now
co"..., l (with,. ."Rim "I'll' .. -' ill c.wp 1)
QuI b (.0 co 10 '.4' Ji,nali:r.rd IJllcn<<l;o." per mw) u..u o( $itl'\'ilz
Wel 01 Sen1aI L..nl:$ A I C D E
w- AU & C D... l..~ 4 ~lW :!2.$w 41.100 61.11JU '74,500
2 UlI4i.., 1 :'600 TS.JUl J 6.CiOO 17.000 I; 6 W.6W ..,lkJO 73,400 ".000 117)00
Uljv, 1'.900 33.JOO 3'.700 3.S~ ~ . 4O,D 65,]m ",lICIO 124.000 156,3OG
6Dlv, 4J.2oo "'0.400 .:lJ.1tIO SJ,700 .4 10 ,. ,COO 81.500 122.3CXl UJ,OOll .".400
IDlv. 53.800 61,000 6.5.1OD 65,1C)l) . 12 ".400 93.200 140.0c0 177-'00 rv.600
.., .....,
a.. Ib (2..$010 4,50JipaJ~d ia~ pe1'1II11,) "" ~ 'P' ...... NClH.sTATt: aOADWA.'VS
Utvcl of s.~ J' ~k crTl'tcOt.'l'rn" IlO,lDW" VS
\.IJla A" B" C D ! Lewi ol~
2 UedIY. 8,800 IUOO U,llOO una /1,00 B" C D E
4 DIY, 19,2W- )I,JOO "',000 2UIWfiv 10,900 '4.200 ,,~
6DI", 19.300 4 7,JOO 'l.ofl)) " 0.". 2..400 )1.000 31,200
'Div, 3.5JOO 51,000 62.900 6Di.., 3'1.100 4'''00 5'UlO
QuI U (1IlOh 1IIU 4~ai.~~ 1"1.~pcf Ilila ucllIOI
withiJo ptiftNPJ' ~Ir !:left,,.l ~ dllUKlll( a....iJcd
~, DY" S(lO,llOO)
a....
2 UlI4n',
4p;...
6 Oil'.
.Di...
1.&"",1 uf$cm.
BOO C" D
11.100
26-'00
40, 'lQO
.9."100
"E
U.zoo
:13,400
~.~
6/.100
An
a...1f1 (_ll'iu ....'50 "aAalq.rl 1I11-*,- fI'I' Mi~.1I4 ~ll!
JIn"'UY c:if)o ""11'11 bWlIUl tS~n~ o( ij"'niaed
....~, ~.ODCl
YM'
2 Ul\dl".
Olivo
6 Div.
. ClI\'.
.....
lzwl or SefY\Dr
1\" C"'. 0
U,200
2',500
....800
'4,100
E
'C.G>
32.eoo
4'.300
60,100
OTJi.E.Jt SlGNAU2:I'.I) JlOADWA n
t; (1i&1IaIiaId UtIClllCUoa ...lyiU)
\. L.mI w SllYim
14 L._ AU 8" C D E
~ ~Vlllli\> :l,zuo 10)00 n.7VO
J 4 tv. 11400 ~eoo ljOO
II
c
~:
A
~
J
III
~
Z
Z
MII"i
Malli
ADJ\JS1'NIHTS
DlVlD~ED
(.ller llOlnapolJ4illl ~H1', MIlle ildk:lle1S ~nI)
1\4.... Le:ll't,"lbrr Adjnlrnc"' ,....~o... .
~4 Yu +511>
UlIdioo..... Nil .XIWo
Uniiv..... V" .,...
UllIi..... 1110 .~ '"
ONE-WAY
(&11" ~iq ""0-'1<1} .01_ illdicalai pcro<a1)
au.w.)' Com$pondia, I\IIjY"IMIlI
UIlCI 't_\lIay LAM$ F~
2 . ~~
J 6 ~~
4 . oAK
, . .V~
lllo __ "'" _. _4 ....... _.."",,...1 ".................... "-__ - ___ -. _.......-. _r. - .....~ 111-........-
.,...__~_........_..~_...__..,_.._.._...._"""'-_ \J____I_...............l~~-
,-.... ""'-. _... -oW1_I...... '" _ _ we _... "'1'" ..~c.,.cllt -'..-01""""," __..rr... -.,....___.... nt_~ ---
__"'--=..._.__Iloo_.
~.. ........
v........... ............ -.-.. ~- ....... ... ..-.
.....o.r-.fT~.....I"".
ftD\IT
-
E - I
Ton1L P.
~./t/e. :
d i-?P~~Jl!?3~1 (!~A$;
j./'~' f./ 4- / / />'7 ~ ~ .iL!-
Dr--- /:--r:'7;'""r-V'~r./ ":}t---//L"11f
L L-;), Yf2--- 7' -7- L.JO ~_~ ~
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
"Helping Floridians create safe, vibrant, sustainable communities"
LAWTON CHILES
Govemor
JAMES F. MURLEY
Secretary
June 4, 1998
..._.-
m( ~ rn ;1~:~i1
PLAr~~mjG AND
ZONING DEPT.
The Honorable Jerry Taylor, Mayor
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Dear Mayor Taylor:
The Department has completed its review of the proposed Comprehensive Plan
Amendment for the City of Boynton Beach (DCA No. 98-1), which was received on March 2,
1998. Copies of the proposed amendment have been distributed to appropriate state, regional and
local agencies for their review and their comments are enclosed.
I am enclosing the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC)
Report, issued pursuant to Rule 9J-11.01O, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The issues
identified in this ORC Report include inadequate public facility analysis and planning for an area
not yet annexed. It is very important that the adopted plan amendment addresses these issues and
all of the objections in the Department's ORC Report.
Upon receipt of this letter~ the City of Boynton Beach has 60 days in which to adopt,
adopt with changes, or determine that the City will not adopt the proposed amendments. The
process for adoption oflocal comprehensive plan amendments is outlined in Section 163.3184,
F.S., and Rule 9J-11.011, F.A.C. The City must ensure that all ordinances adopting comprehen-
sive plan amendments are consistent with the provisions of Section 163.3189(2)(a), F.S.
Within ten working days of the date of adoption, the City of Boynton Beach must submit
the following to the Department:
Fl01IDA KEYS
1m of Critical StIle Concern Field Offoce
2796 Overseas Highway. Suile 212
Maralhon, Aorida 33050-2227
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100
Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 8S0.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781
I nternet add ress: http://www.state.fl.us/comaff/dca.htm I
GmN SWAMI'
1m of Crilical StIle Concern Field Office
155 East Sunrnerlin
Bartow. Florida 33B30-4641
SOUTH Fl01IDA lECOVElY OffICE
P.O.1lor ~2
B600 N.W. 36lh Sb!eI
Miami. Florida 331 59-4022
Honorable Jerry Taylor
June 4, 1998
Page Two
Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendments;
A copy of the adoption ordinance;
A listing of additional changes not previously reviewed;
A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the
ordinance; and
A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's ORC
Report.
The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a
compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent.
In order to expedite the regional planning council's review of the amendments, and
pursuant to Rule 9J-l1.011(5), F.A.C., please provide a copy of the adopted amendment directly
to the Executive Director of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council.
Please contact Bernard Piawah, Planning Manager; Roger Wilburn, Community Program
Administrator; or Charles Gauthier, AICP, Growth Management Administrator, at (850)
487-4545 if we can be of assistance as you formulate your response to this Report.
Sincerely,
\.._,1 "\/lIlC
V~ YVl~-
.1 tJ,<}. Tho~as Beck, Chief
-/ Bureau of Local Planning
JTBlbp
Enclosures: Objections~ Recommendations and Comments Report
Review Agency Comments
cc: Mr. Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner
Mr. Michael Busha, AICP, Executive Director, Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council
i..'
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
OBJECTIONS, RECOM}.1ENDATIONS AND COM:MENTS
FOR TIIE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Amendment 98-1
June 4, 1998
Division of Resource Planning
and Management
Bureau of Local Planning
This report is prepared pun;uant to Rule 91-11.010
:q
'^-
INTRODUCTION
The following objections, recommendations and comments are based upon the Department's
review of the City of Boynton Beach proposed 98-1 amendment to its comprehensive plan pursuant
to s. 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.).
Objections relate to specific requirements of relevant portions of Chapter 9J-5, Florida
Administrative Codes (F.A.C.), and Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. Each objection includes a
recommendation of one approach that might be taken to address the cited objection. Other
approaches may be more suitable in specific situations. Some of these objections may have initially
been raised by one of the other external review agencies. If there is a difference between the
Department's objection and the external agency advisory objection or comment, the Department's
objection would take precedence.
The local government should address each of these objections when the amendment is
resubmitted for our compliance review. Objections which are not addressed may result in a
determination that the amendment is not in compliance. The Department may have raised an
objection regarding missing data and analysis items which the local government considers not
applicable to its amendment. If that is the case, a statement justifying its non-applicability pursuant
to Rule 9J-5.002(2), F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will make a determination on the
non-applicability of the requirement, and if the justification is sufficient, the objection will be
considered addressed.
The comments which follow the objections and recommendations are advisory in nature.
Comments will not form bases of a determination of non-compliance. They are included to call
attention to items raised by our reviewers. The comments can be substantive, concerning planning
principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing with grammar, organization,
mapping, and reader comprehension.
Appended to the back of the Department's report.are the comment letters from the other state
review agencies and other agencies~ organizations and individuals. These comments are advisory to
the Department and may not form bases of Departmental objections unless they appear under the
"Objections" heading in this report.
OBJECTIONS RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 98-1
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
I. CONSISTENCY WITH RULES 9J-5 AND 9J-11., F.A.C., & CHAPTER 163., F.S.
The City of Boynton Beach has proposed three amendments to its Future Land Use Map
(FLUM). The Department has identified some concerns with all the amendments:
"
Case No.1: This is a request to revise the FLUM designation on a 14.18-acre site from
Moderate Density Residential which allows 4.84 to 7.26 dwelling units per acre to Local Retail
Commercial.
Objection:
1. The public facility analysis provided mentions only that there is existing capacity to
accommodate the proposed land use change. However, the amendment is not supported
by an adequate public facility analysis which utilizes the City's adopted level of service
standards to determine the public facility demand created by the proposed land use
designation. based on the maximum development allowed under the proposed designation
and comparing it with the public facility demand under the current designation, to
indicate any surplus capacity or deficit that might occur. Section 163.3177(6); Rule 9J-
5.005(2)(a) and (c), 9J-5.006(2)(a);(3)(b)1., and (3)(c)3.; 9J-5.011(1)(f)1.; and 9J-
5.016(3)(c)6.. F.A.C.
2. The proposed change is from Moderate Density Residential which allows 4.84 to 7.26
dwelling units per acre to Local Retail Commercial. However. the Local Retail
designation to which it is changing is not properly defmed in the plan (Future Land Use
Element Policy. 1.16.1). Although this policy lists the type of uses allowed in this
category, it does not indicate the intensity of use to be implemented. The category allows
high density residential developments (maximum 10.8 units per acre) as well as mixed
use developments without specifying the type and proportion (i.e, the percentage
distribution) of the mix of uses and the intensity standards to be implemented in this land
use category. Future Land Use Element, Policy 1.16.3 which attempts to establish
intensity standards for non-residential uses is vague because it states that "maximum
floor/area ratio in non-residential land use categories shall be limited by the maximum lot
coverage, the maximum height. and the parking, landscaping, and stonnwater retention
requirements contained in the City's Code of Ordinances" without specifying in the plan
the intensity standards to be applied. In the absence of the intensity standards to be
applied to the commercial designation. as well as the proportion of mix for the mixed
1
uses, it will be impossible to conduct a public facility analysis and planning based on the
maximum development allowed by the Local Retail category. Section 163.3177(6)(a);
Rule 9J-5.006(3)(c)1., 7.; (4)(a)2., and (4)(c), F.A.C.
Recommendation:
1. Include, with the amendment, an adequate data and analysis of the public facilities
demands created by the proposed land use change based on the City's adopted level of
service standards and the maximum development allowed under the proposed
designation, and comparing the existing demand with the demand under the proposed
designation, to indicate any surplus capacity or deficit that might exist. If there is a
deficit the analysis, should indicate how the deficit will be addressed.
"
2. Revise the definition of the Local Retail Commercial category (policy 1.16.1), based on
adequate and relevant data and analysis, to indicate the intensity standard to be
implemented for the commercial uses allowed under this designation. Furthermore,
specify the proportion (Le, the percentage distribution) of the mix of uses to be
implemented in this category. In the absence of the intensity standards to be applied to
the commercial designation, as well as the proportion of mix for the mixed uses, it will be
impossible to conduct public facility analysis and planning based on the maximum
development allowed by the Local Retail category.
Case No.2: This is a request to change the FLUM designation on a 23-acre site (yet to be
annexed) from Medium Density Residential (County designation) which allows 5 dwelling units
per acre to Low Density Residential which allows 4.84 dwelling units per acre.
Objection: According to the supporting documentation, the subject property is yet to be annexed
into the City. Pursuant to Section 163.3171, Florida Statutes (F.S.). "a municipality shall
exercise authority under this act for the total area under its jurisdiction". The City, by proposing
land use change to an area yet to be annexed it is planning for an area that is not within its
jurisdiction which is inconsistent with the law. A municipality can plan for an area outside its
jurisdiction if there is a joint planning agreement formally stated and approved in appropriate
official action by the governing bodies involved.
Furthermore, prior to any consideration of a plan amendment by a municipal governing
body pursuant to Sections 163.3184(3), 163.3187, and 163.3174(1), F.S, the local government is
to provide notice and conduct a public hearing in which only affected persons (i.e., those owning
property, residing, or owing and operating business within the boundaries of the local
government) shall participate. Thus, conducting a public hearing, involving land outside a
municipality is prohibited by law. Chapter 163.3171, 163.3174(1), 163.3184(1)(a), and (3), and
163.3187, F.S., and 9J-5.004., 9J-5.005(8), F.A.C.
2
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City should not adopt the proposed amendment
until the annexation process has been completed. Upon completion of the annexation period, the
City can then propose to change the land use; until then the County's designation will continue to
be applicable to the annexed property.
Case No.3: This is a request to change the FLUM designation on a 66.16- acre site from
Moderate Density Residential to High Density Residential.
"
Objection: The public facility analysis provided mentions only that there is existing capacity to
accommodate the proposed land use change. However, the amendment is not supported by an
adequate public facility analysis which utilizes the City's adopted level of service standards to
determine the public facility demand created by the proposed land use designation, based on the
maximum development allowed under the proposed designation and comparing it with the public
facility demand under the current designation, to indicate any surplus capacity or deficit that
might occur. Section 163.3177(6); Rule 9J-5.005(2)(a) and (c), 9J-5.006(2)(a);(3)(b)1., and
(3)(c)3.; 9J-5.011(1)(t)1.; and 9J-5.016(3)(c)6., F.A.C.
Recommendation: Include, with the amendment, an adequate data and analysis of the public
facilities demands created by the proposed land use change based on the City's adopted level of
service standards and the maximum development allowed under the proposed designation, and
comparing the existing demand with the demand under the proposed designation, to indicate any
surplus capacity or deficit that might exist. If there is a deficit the analysis, should indicate how
the deficit will be addressed.
II CONSISTENCY WITH STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The proposed amendments do not adequately address and further the State
Comprehensive Plan including the following goals and policies (Chapter 163.3177(9), F.S.):
Land Use Goal 16(a) and Policy (b)3 and 6., regarding functional mix and the character of urban
areas, and the availability of water to meet demands; and
Public Facilities Goal (18)(a) and Policies (b)5., and 6., regarding the provision of public
facilities.
Recommendation: Revise the amendments, as indicated earlier, so as to be consistent with the
above cited goals and policies for the State Comprehensive Plan.
3
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
lAW1'On CDILes
OOVEMOR
6
3400 WEST COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD
FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33309-3421
(954) 777-4593
TIIOI'L\S P. ~ .Jr.
SECRETARY
DIVISION OF
PLANNING AND PROGRAMS
00
JUN 8 1998
j:
iU
I ,
i....I
RrruRn\[2
l.!; ~ l.!; U \J ".
Mr. Ray Eubanks~ Planning Manager
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of State Planning
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
March 17, 1998
~
~~
~
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
ill m~: 00 ~ [;: ...
RPM SSP -
PLAN Pr.OCESSI~!G It ~.
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS
WCAL GOVERNMENT: City of Boynton Beach 98-1
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
The Department has reviewed the documents for the proposed Comprepensive Plan Amendment
for the City of Boynton Beach. The amendment proposes to reclassify 14.l6 acres from moderate
density residential to loqil retail commercial; reclassify 23 acres.from medium residential to low
density residential; and reclassify 66.16 acres from moderate density t:.esidential to high density
residential. There is no traffic analysis included to determine the potential impacts from these
amendments.
Since two of the three amendments will intensify development, the Department requests a formal
review. Thank you for the opportunity to review this amendment.
Sincerely,
~~
Joseph M. Yesbeck, P.E.
District Director
Planning and Programs
JMY/rr
cc: B. Romig, FDOT Central Office
R. Wilburn, DCA
G. Schmidt, FDOT-4
J. Anderson, FDOT-4
~
...._~
;-"',.
.'~
~':./
~',
~:a- ~
t~
::1;....
~,.....
i
~~
~.
".:,;.
~,
~:
".
.....;.
0,
March 9, 1998
treQlure
~~ft1~ co~t I
.~~~"".:::.'! '~glonQ
,~;J;'pianniQg
council
Mr. Tom Beck, Chief
Bureau of Local Planning
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Subject:
City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan
Draft Amendments - DCA Reference No. 98-1
Dear Mr. Beck:
rn
m 00 mow ~ --, ~ -
MNt 1 2 1998
I
'-
RPM sSP
PlAN PfWCESSING TEAM__ .
(~
~10
~
This is to acknowledge the receIpt of materials pertaining to the above-referenced
amendments on 3/06/98. Staff anticipates presenting its rep~rt and recommended
comments to Council at the regular meeting of 4/17/98. pursuant to Section 163.3184,
Florida Statutes, a written report including any objections,: recommendations for
modification and comments will be submitted to you by 3/29/98.
If you have any questions~ please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
r,1 ((
Tet:J. H:~
Planning Director
TLH/jkp
..~~
r]
~J
r?~
.~ LE-.
~ .~~
.1 ~~~if~~
~ . . . ......::..;..:.~..:...-iou-~~...:.
..~
~i-~_~;~{:~::L:-=;.~
3228 s.w. martin downs blvd.
suite 205 . p.o. box 1529
palm city, f10rlda 34990
phone (S61) 221.4:160
!"c ~(,;:'4:l6r f:.:x (5{)~! :l:!1..~~:.7
'~
I
1#.
c.:A,
\.'";.
~~
~2i~i:-"7;!i:11
. ,
/!,:-,
i'
",>-
&\
P"
~':
~
~j
~.
ti.~
~~i:
~,
~-
{:;:
'..
~..:
g
..~'.
iJ
F:<
F~"
~~~i
....-.
r.
treQlure
~~ co~t I
t~~ reglona
planniQg
council
~~'-"
-~\ii \~ l~ '.
----::- ,- '\ \11 '"l !
~" li" :? , .;;-.,.......
\r \ ,'( :.n '~;.-- '. ..
, r\ \ "~. - .' ._,- --
'\u'--. '.;
~~~PR '2. () \99Il? \
6SP ·
- _. u\ t>~~~t~'--
.~~
,-
April 17, 1998
~
y;{:.fl;)
<::Vo
Mr. Tom Beck, Chief
Bureau of Local Planning
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Subject: City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan
Draft Amendments - DCA Reference No. 98-1
Dear Mr. Beck:
Council has reviewed the above-referenced amendments in accordance with the
requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes and the Council's adopted plans, policies
and review procedures. Enclosed is a copy of our report as approved. by the Council at its
regular meeting on April 17, 1998 pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes.
If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
~ c.f 6L-
Terry L. Hess, AICP
Planning Director
TLHIlg
Enclosure
Cc: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
....
. ~~ :.': 'S, .::~-~i:t
301 east ocean boulevard
suite 300
stuart, florida 34994
phone (561) 221-4060
S{ \!6'1.(Y()60 fox (%1) 221..6.06i
'.
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
~:!
MEMORANDUM
To:
. Council Members
AGENDA ITEM 4B
From:
Staff
Date:
April 17, 1998 Council Meeting
Subject: Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review
Draft Amendments to the City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan
DCA Reference No. 98-1
Introduction
The Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act,
Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, requires that the Council review local government
comprehensive plan amendments prior to their adoption. Under the provisions of this
law, the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) prepares. an Objections,
Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report on a proposed amendment only if
requested to do so by the local government, the regional planDing council, or an affected
person, or if an ORC Report is otherwise deemed necessary by the DCA. If the local
government requests DCA to prepare an ORC Report, then the Council must provide
DCA with its own objections, recommendations for modification and comments on the
proposed amendment within 30 days of its receipt.
BacklZround
The City of Boynton Beach has proposed three amendments to its Future Land Use Map
(FLUM). Information on the properties which are subject to the proposed amendments is
provided in Table 1 and the location of each property is shown on the attached maps:
The City has not requested a formal review of the proposed amendments, concluding that
the amendments are consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and that adopted level
of service standards will not be exceeded. However, on March 27, 1998, the DCA
notified the City that a formal review would be carried out.
Table 1
City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Map Amendments
DCA Reference No. 98-1
- -
Northwest quadrant of intersection of
Woolbright Road and 1-95
#2 23.0 Medium Low Density
Residentiill-5 * Residential
#3 66.2 Moderate Density High Density
Residential Residential
Total Acreage 103.4
Northeast quadrant of intersection of _
Miner Road and Lawrence Road
Northwest quadrant of intersection of
Woolbright Road and 1-95
* Palm Beach County FLUM Designation. Property recently annexed.
Evaluation
Amendments # 1 & 3 are evaluated together because they are part of the same original
PUD and are located adjacent to each other,-in the northwest quadrant of the intersection
of Woodbright Road and 1-95. The property in Amendment # 1 is presently vacant, and
is - surrounded by a stormwater retention lake to the north, a shopping center and
restaurant to the south, single-family detached homes to the west and an apartment
complex (part of amendment # 3) and vacant land to the eaSt. FLUM Designations are
Medium Density Residential to the north, west and east, and Local Retail Commercial to
the south.
Amendment # 3 includes lands which have already been developed for residential
purposes (both apartments and single-family homes). Surrounding land uses include
single-family detached homes to the north and west, some vacant-land and a shopping
center to the south, and vacant land and the rights-of-way for a rail line and 1-95 to the
east. Surrounding FLUM designations include Low Density Residential to the north,
Medium Density Residential to the west, Local Retail Commercial to the south, and- High
Density Residential to the east.
The property in amendment # 1 belongs to a religious organization which envisioned the
construction of a church and school on site. However, the organization elected to
maintain its church and related facilities at its downtown location and the subject
property is now to be used for a health care "campus," with a nursing home, an adult
congregate liviI)g facility and a medical office building. Since office uses are not
permissible in a residential district, the City proposes to apply a designation of Local
Retail Commercial to this property. The City indicates that the proposed uses are
compatible with surrounding uses and that the City Housing Element promotes the
approval of adult congregate living facilities if compatible with the neighborhood.
Although the City Comprehensive Plan recommends against designation of additional
2
land as Local Retail Commercial, the proposed use qualifies as an exemption because of
its nature.
l~
The property in amendment # 3 is subject to a settlement agreement between the City and
a PUD developer. According to City staff, the controversy leading to the settlement
agreement had to do with development of the commercial property to the south
(originally under joint ownership) and the overall residential density to be permitted. .
Under the settlement agreement, the developer-has the authority-to-build 687 units, but
the existing FLVM designation would allow only 479 units. There are no actual impacts
as a result of this amendment, since the 66 acres is already entirely developed. The
proposed designation more accurately reflects the actual density as developed.
Amendment # 2 is a 23 acre parcel presently used for agricultural purposes. Its existing
FLUM designation is Medium Residential-S, a County designation. The property is
being annexed by the City. Surrounding land uses include single-family residential
homes to the north, east, and south. although a canal and right-of-way buffer the property
to the south. A mobile home park is located to the west. Surrounding FLUM
designations are Low Density Residential to the north, south and east, and Medium
Residential-S (County designation) to the west. The City designation would allow a few
less units then the County designation, if developed to the maximum density.
Extrajurisdictional Impacts
The amendments were reviewed through the Palm Beaeh Intergovernmental Plan
Amendment Review Committee Process in December of 1997.' According to the
Clearinghouse Coordinator, no objections were received regarding the proposed
amendments.
Effects on Regional Resources or Facilities
There would appear to be no significant effects on regional resources and facilities as a
result of these amendments.
Objections, Recommendations for Modification,. and Comments
A. Objections
1. None
B. Comments
1. The proposed land uses in amendment # 1 provide a positive change to the
existing land use mix of the area. However, Council staff questioned the City
regarding the designation of Local Retail Commercial, since no retail uses are
proposed. The City's response was that Local Retail Commercial allowed for the
proposed office use, that existing land designated as Local Retail Commercial was
3
located adjacent to the south, and that the City did not desire to "spot" a new
designation at this location. Given the City's acknowledged overabundance of
land designated for localltetail commercial Use, it would seem to be more prudent
to establish a new FLUM category entitled Medical Facilities or Institutional
Medical.
Recommendation
Council should adopt the above comments and approve their transmittal. to the
Department of Community Affairs.
Attachments
4
.
. ., _ J. ':1
~~
~
STATE OF flORIDA
o E PAR T MEN T.) 0 F COM M U NIT Y A F F A IRS
.Helping Floridians create safe, vibrant, sustainable comm.unities. . .
LAWTON CHILES
Governor
JAMES F. MURlEY
Secret.ary
- March~'I, 1998
Honorable Jerry Taylor, Mayor
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
R f: F.a~ '- i \,.....
" l!. - ~'Q ~ . ~ D
~ '-:A. f.t:~...' ~ ..
-...' k,
Dear Mayor Taylor:
MAR 8 0 199B
i/{EAsuR;: COt ...,. " -.
PlIJ''\N~I'N'; ':~: t, '..;=!Ji.;AL
. ,~ ~.:.. ~ ~,ju.;\L.":;
. ..~:..
The Department has conducted a preliminary review of the City's proposed
comprehensive plan amendment received on March 2, 1998, DCA Refe~ence No. 98-L
The Department has detennined that the proposed plan amendment should be fonnally
reviewed for consistency with the minimum criteria contained in Chapter 163, Florida Statutes
'(F.S.), and Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code (F.AC.).
The Department will review the proposed amendment and issue an Objections,
Recommendations and Comments Report in accordance with Chapter 163, F.S., and Rule 9J-5,
F.A.C.
If you have any questions, please contact Bernard Piawah, Planning Manager overseeing
the review of the amendment, at (850) 487-4545.
Sincerely,
C)A>^-~ ~'
Charles Gauthier, AICP
Growth Management Administrator
Bureau of Local Eannirig
CG/bp
cc: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP, Planning & Zoning Director
Michael Busha, AICP, Executive Director, Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council
FLOIIDA IDS
Nu 01 Crilial sr. Cllnczm Field OKa
27% CMnus Hishway. Suile 212
Maralhm Florid~ J30So.m7
2SSS SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORID.\.32399.2100
Phone: 8S0.488.8466/Suncorn 278.8466 FAX: 8S0.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781
I nternet address: http://www.state.fl.us/comaff/dc.a : htm I
CI&H MAW
Nu 01 CriliaI Sla Canam Field OKIlI!
155 blI Sunnerlin
BIllOw. FIotid3 H8J~l
SOUTH FLORIDA lKtMIYoma.
1'.0. .. 4tIZ2
8600 N. W. ]6111 5lml
MI~i. Florida JJ1S9-4022
~
South }c lorida VVater Management District
3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 -(561) 686-8800. FL WATS 1-800-432-2045
11)1)(561)697-2574
6
GOV 08-28
R- .'-' T:. \\Jc..'D
.. ~ l",. ~ t:.
l-'~~~
. t.o
W\R ~.~ ~99~
. I . ~ t" i% l..r.: ~.~ ~,~t~~l
__-lI-,\.,t'>. ....... . "'L
\" ....t.~.............- __. .". .....;.. \
. ,.... .,;I~ '. 1 "w\ .."-'
f;.};.: 'k'~ ~:...'';' ... oJ
March 16, 1998
Ray Eubanks, Planning Manager
Plan Review and DR! Processing Team
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
Subject:
Preliminary Review Recommendation
City of Boynton Beach, DCA # 98-1
The South Florida Water Management District staff has reviewed the subject document. we do not
recommend that a formal review of the proposed amendmen~ be undertaken. If you have any
questions or require additional information, please call me at (561) 687-~779.
Sincerely,
~~-
P .K. Sharma, AICP
Senior Planner
Lower East Coast Planning Division
. Planning Department
PKS/mh
c:
Michael Busha, TCRPC
Tambri Heyden, Boynton Beach
Roger Wilburn, DCA
GO'rJ~ing Board:
Frank Williamson, Jr., Chairman
Eugene K. Pettis, Vice Chairman
Mitchell W. Berger
Vera M. Caner 6
William E. Graham
William Hammond
Richard A. Machek
MichaelI>.Minton
Miriam Singer
Samuel' E. Poole m, Executive I>irector
Michael Slayton, I>eputy Executive I>irector
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 24680,Wt:St. Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680
! \ ,~\.\ \.
I \t.~~ .
! FIlUMERE~ \\ \ \
: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY \~\.:\ \ \
........ ~EROBEACH \ ~.
- ., "---'SR 60 - ': \ ';
~- - .,..-- .~, ./
- L;__....~-_--; ----4 \~\ 'v\
. 7).___ . - \'\ ·
, - "~J.t!" tI1.
I "' ~ I', \ \
, SR68 \ ~, ,
i ~10 E~\\
:~.LOOE~~~~ \
, l \ - , \~:\ \ \ ATLANI7c 0CEm
~~r--------- i:\:" ~~\\ \ I
~/ ,~ \' MARTINCO~ ~~ ~ \ \1
/' ,/ \\ ~16. ~~\\\,
('~~-----~~--_~o_----- ~~
, ~706 "-\ \'
LcKE OrEECHOBEE I JUPI'I'ER \ i \
: //~/~ PAlMBUat~:~~B~
" , ( ..P ~OKEE "'" GARDENS ' ~~ '" " \
~'L~)!,fl ~.DcP THEACJlEAOE '~lu~:" (
~ .~. ;: RoYAL wEri I I II i
..... ~ __' . PALMBEACH P.u.wBEACH 1
, ~eQ ~ BEULGLADE ' 'PAUlBEACH
, -~./ WELLINGTON \1' Ii ')
r '-/. LAlcEW"
: ! PALM BEACH COUNTY I ~MJ .1
: \ ~~ m~~ ~ \
I BOYNIONBEACH
. ~' U/ i il I
,~ \ . OIl '01 :
.: ,~ ;" -. ~- 111 (i' I
: \\ ~ DE1fj1,n~)
1 \ sJ1~~1 1 \
--J----------\~:----~- /-/lNli/ (1 i
\ TREAsURE COAST REGION I;
, I r 1I1~',' .
...
N
*
i
" lDlES
./
.' "I
/ D
./
/
s
-I
JD
...
. ....
"
I
~
~
!3
7
:~ ~:~?::;:f;:~~~::~:~:~: ~~:.~::~:~~:~~~~~:
~.. .
!I
01Uhl=. LAI\JD uSE
LITEM #2 ---11
!,.
~
.
:i
,
...---.. . - -.
~v pc~ cJxo .62:.
==..-;:; ,- I 1===-:-:='=':'::-, (-.--:..-. .-
j t,;~W'D.p ~i\o("'~ I _i.-I.
" I,~" I
I _Ii-=:t=
.- -i....'.
~=
: ~-
I.. -.-,-.
r ~ .
~tt.
_II'"
--:-
--.' ."
-/ --
...J,
..
.:J -,
-'
, ....."'.
..... '--~._. .--
t-.........~'\I' r" r
I t
~-....,~
F =, '[;.
a == .i::
_..:~,;R
~ AiiU-:-:=:'::: ~:
1/S
III I I
400. 'SOO FEET
P/..A NN/N r.
- -
.. .......... .,_..". .
I
-..'
,'. - ~.-::~~..1
, I ~~;.. . . '",
!r .; ,-''''f.., M _f l' . R
.,. . .., ... ,. ~ ,......
'If n
~'I'l
i : ' 1'1
......
I ,
1'1 I
1Q
i.rr r'::T' ~~
'.u. .~.llll..!l] \
.......:.-- ~-~...._~ ~
\ . "l _ ~ I
- ~'-- E D US 4;
, ,l::; ~"", '''tit :', l:::-: r ... :: . ; R~ ~ ~U R R NT LAN c: : ~lU.i '.' ~:::;;J""-' ;'L'" ;'
.. . ...... ~......-.. . I ...1....1rr:1.... ~,. t. "'1
.r-~ j" ~~-." ---. ". .-------. "I':'~ . ...._~. ;"lolll.....,......_ -, . ~-....
-.:.1..1',,' :..~",., . .~~~~ .~I..-:~.il~. :.1\ .!: .: ___}::t=: '. ~'. ~~~.. ..,.~'..~
~.. i I""'f .~.' . ---:~- - ~:. _.' ~ ITEM #3 '\:\ ~~.. .': ~.,:t-$-:P-H8'~ F~ ~"~
7-t~1 H '-:;'f ......:.-~~... . ':~:E.~ I .,~ : ~-' I' "//1 i. .:::ll.~....:- ". r :1 I ;.; ~~:~~~. 10\' '.'
. "(.- .\.. '~~.- .1. "I ...., ,'.... .-' -..... - . "l!r:'
-:I . ".: ..':\,.......... "" '~.'::.. '. . .'. 1;/, i. "\: .,./J,:-:-~", "S ,.w-rp:l r I .,. \1.1 . .'
r~.;.. ~., . I..Y .,~.~:..._' '~5; I -~. of i i ~: ~~i:~%~}~:"'~'.1 ~l.w~:= . '" ,) .~..
.. . " "_.<,~' ~....fPJ . . ~ l' '. . !ltq~~~:j .: ~".' ., IT'B" II I ~ ~1" ~. ,
"':>--,"'!~.~.~ E .~~ ~~ i Ji I": f' ~:~.il' 'I .. ~:-:. . . -
r-l ,::~"-'.. 'o~~ ..;/~~.~~lf@~. ..._.~.J~~1:i/. .:.: I..: C'hA;L'~..wr;r..:~ :_~.. t:.:
L J _". .n .... .....,~ ~~ ,-'_H --~..'
~'" .~~'-:1fjf~::~ ~ 1'\ ~ ..l11..I.-W~~~~;:p~;.~
NM:. ~ "... t_ f-.:Trr.-.!- 1Ni::].ll~:~;iU ~ I ~ E ~
""!: "R'!: i' j t ~ill'''~.:o:'l-I:j I 'l.Ji .' ' ~ .: . " I'... ........ : ~ . .t.-....t..... ..... ..p..... ..,...,.....-00:'.
- . ..'. r... .. l.1 II...... .I'l T · l-.:lm.t.~....-l ~ I I !1!
- . , M. ~ ". ':.&.. -[~;"t _1. .:J ~ \ Itf.. &Ii.... ",...t,,".'I'I" ....f-I. .J.,tl.u..............
~: '. : 'F' ~. ~~:~~.; ~~ :miitl ~~':;.... ; " ~ \ ~ r.r.-n~~. '........._:....101......... .
~ ~ ~ ~- we. , ." '- I tt:f:tH~ 1'''+"'"1 ..w;i_tt.........i.t!!tl
~ ~ ,I;:: , .UillJ' ...... "1 . ,- , ,. __' ... .
.. , . .'. ..2:: .-- .~..- ~ - I li.:Cl I . . ~;. R.... ..".~ .'. ............'
~ ' J!"W"'-~'~ ! ~-, ....:~ ~ r. .' ~I ~_ - . 1 ~ U :I~ II 1::0_: ..,
.::I ." ,.. ,1: ~~Ui-.......-.~ ,. .. ... 1. .
-.~~.~.::.:~.:..:.'~~..,SINGLE 'FAMiLY ~ES1DENT1AL' ~. \ = I ~ I: II : ~ :- ! : :: l~ .:..: '
.~: ,.I.~\ ~ ~ - 1=== -.., .:.:l.,.:..:.~....... iH 1 r .~(~;~I: ~,~~I ~ iJ * LLLI ,,',' 1 q '"I', I ~I,.. ..~I l'
_ .......;. ... .)).. r-u;r ~. . ..,.to I ~. \: \ I .1iT I I. .J...i "'--t-t- I,.,.i. If; I I I ~ !
.... ....:..... \ . \ I. II i ., 111 I I If.
=. ~. - . '0' ,-'~ .... -:;"';;;""::S''''NGLE :]1 . i \\ " I I I . ( I ;,'..."'l'-:'!" .I:
~ _ ."_0' . : .. _. .....1..1
~\~~{~L~~~\~l~~~NTS. IT ALE ! '1 '! ~L.:' :.~'.,:.~~~~~::>. ",Jr
=-:=.:::. ~ \....l.. I , I' f . II'" .' , . I'.'l' .ftl'U'!'! ~J.+;
~ 0:; ~~~~t\~~. .~ ITEM #3 I I I 11:1'1' SI ... .-......... 1-'1+' 'I'Ht"I~'~
::il( . ....~~....'S....... ~ I I i I } l'I'IH"I..I"I"'I~:..t r-.......foj.I....i1W.J 1J
0( :.c . ~ ..::. ~( :11 ~~ MULTI FAMILY t q It 1\ \ l"I..'.........toI....-,......,. ....t...I..:rt:l: ',ll
~,<<.~ ~, ~~~:\.:V\ ENTJAL \ ill i ~III II 1...i...,...'....t'.t..:tl..~.I..I.. "I-t... III I'
i.#;?;:: ')I. ~ -.... '?-~-:' J VACANT \ RESID I FI~ 1:1:' II r 1: :ft..........,..o\u.'...1 ~.~,tI.I..I:l.I.+:.11.tH. I
~~~<,~'1~, ~~::1~. \1 I! WI .1.1111 :1:1: \.. '"1'''\''''''''''' J..I........'I.I~U~j ~~;.....
~$ ~1. ~.xa::~ ~ \ : I l\/...:....<:~.:~.~.[.). I I I I n I' II-II~: IH
. ' _:~.~ :t- ~:.:-_ \\' VACANT ' I 'f;;'.~..~~~~.(:.f J \ I t ~ . \ \-l I I I I I I ~H I
_ ., 1"..:1...... T ~"J:..._: \ i I I ;'.>{:~.:--b:,';~~M 1 I I I r- \t.t' it II"
. -:l.\ '~4r..... . '" . j' '. .. .....
. D""" ~r "". ......... j" .... ..~ ,.....t. .
-' E.j~: I~:::. : \ ':'.;nt~.:~~ I I I~IW II11 tllll:.
~.~,....,.. ::::. : 'ii " f'~;;~'::i"l' I I . .~- '1 1H',
('\-' ..-1~ ~.., ". ,\ \,~..".. I. \~ 1 L.l. .
:=~t..; 00-1:..,... :.~J1.. . ~~: I, : \ .~. ~s~t~J' ~~rtrr I "t' 11\lil'll~
, ':-1' t ~:'Z: ." i. ~. '&- ~j L. . ~ l~.lj t-, t.tE:
_~ .M. L r_~~~~....? ~ _'-:::=_... ...~r __._".,gOl..'(,H" ..:jj~'..o ..:n'~. ......." I~~" W'
_. I J r\'~~\...l= _----. . ~ If"h:Lffr' .' h':::::r-:~~.~ .'!~~";.
~~/..-! ~--~:',. p- -. -.. "., J?' " .' . f;..":;';~~:,~~ .l:Z-f.!;
. ~//:'. '~-l:';'{~;~; , , Aj]G]'l - 't~W:[;}h;' ;f~~.
.."JllL 8""16 ~.- ~. I~,.:- : k.:,~~.;;:~~ ::-'~"'I"'"
- ,~.<.j ~-
~U.'J
.. -::.;..~.:.
.:~ ..-
. .- "
. - ....:_:f2L~. I 1 I
- . '~1
..:.:;;1
- --=--:~~
,--;,;..~=j_. . .
~.'''.:k.r.:~ f.;.~~;t'"
: - -'~ ~.,;;~.. :.~.... .~::.::;. ! f
~
~-1
11
=~~;:~J b~.:::::::~~;:-:~::::~:~: ~::y:;:~~;rr~~~~~;:
Ii I WHm1i 1~':~;.~9'~"~~i~~~I-.~~;~-E~f.~~E h ~ '~Ti n:r: ; ; TR ~
." ~v p~(.v ,.~........,~ ~__p . I .';::.':~=~~~:'~~'~~:~.~'~;~~;';;_. .,.... - . .
t .' , ..........~......... , .
....."~,,,..., c:~. ....,.'... ......... i ' - - -
.........bd.. I r ........... ....-... ~
- :::::::::: -.:..:: ::::::::::: ::::::::: - I ~-t.. r' I .. '
:::::::::~::::: = = :::::::::: ::::::::: ;'. .. . .;. ;'.: ::: ~.
........+.... ~ ~ ::::::::::F::::::: i .... .. ~
~ :~~~~~~~~~~~~~: j. ::::::::::~: ::::::::::.:::::::: I I I & ..'~"'~
t Vi - ........... ................... I ,"t.':: ...
... ..~...~..C~~.. ~! - ........... ................... I II r \....., "I ;
~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~ j ~ :::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::. .... .,.. ~:~
:: :::::::::::t::::: ""'\.... = :::::::::: .::::::::::::::::::::' .. ..' . '.' .>.:' ~ 't~::
.. ..........-...." /' , :-:......... ..... .... -- .. ..-:
.~.-;-.~~~..i~~.~..,~~/::. ::::::::::::::::::. !I r1R~~~ . ~~~=
: ". . 1-_._. 'f .... ...,,~ ~ ................... · , f~~ ...". ~~. ~ . ,.:~.....
;- . .: .... -- ' .: '. ., ~E ................... I I lti,..:~< or.;;. ,Q
i iJ.I: ~;~~>~ :~':~ ~.~ ::::::::::::::::::: ,I I' l~....~~t...~. ~~'~~~€f'
]~1~~'~:'=::' ~ :: ::::::::::::::::::: ~l I .' .. ....'~.. .~.~ ~
! oj~~., '"=,.._ - ::::::::::::::::::. !) J ..._._~.:. .' '"::M J C! :- ...
~, ..... ~. ... .................. , ',,~ . .
~~ ~j~~i~; <~ ~ .;;;;;;;;;;;;;:;;:: i \ \\,,;.~: L~\1'T ~ ~;..~
. ,'T\ .Rill ~ - .................. I i '.,"1.;::' !on ~ ';:l .-;.;
u bWwj;: ::::::::::::::::::.; ,.....'..,.. ;'r.j~~1l .~~
iTfT1 I rrm rTIT" ................... . .~.. - .' (. .w, : ... C-AIIJ ~ ~ '\. '" I ,,~.7;;-; '7: ~~~.;. 'k. - . .._~~ . .
---::.......1:. - "r.,':~ ;'~~"::-,,, ~ ~~. -. r ~:(-f--. ., ,lltl! / ~€D:~ ~i ,\.o.~ '-'.:' :-.'::~.
._.u.. ... ->'/~" r-::::>::: ~ ==; III,. . m.. ;.-:_:.::::.::.....
.......... . . ..,711 UILl'~. . 'r-' I ~r ..:'.--_-:--,. ., . . , .. :'7''':'.:='::~:~:~ 'f"
..........hl~ ......:~ (--./ I~' . f:.:::i,:-.-.--.. ~ .
......... ,.j . :f1::::(:::f.;"'It1 ',~ ' fi"'-- - -.- /t.J. ~: .-.:;-;:.... ..
::::::::: z P:.~;:v;~,",i:--t~.:~i · 91 . '.:ot\ - IiJ.I tIll ....L.. -1:.::-- ;::. ..'
::::::'.:: '~I~l-J.~' ~ -'. .............. ., - lli . ..,.::.~..:.::-.:;~ '" '."
::::::::; j ictq'~~~ . . /? . .... ... ~ ~;;':m :::::::::::::,' '/?nin.:;jPj~:;if/f'-
....., ~:. -. \. IttlllllaIIl1.!]I..l__ ............. ~_ ~~.._......._ ~
:::::::::5 ,.\€:'.' "-1:~;r~ . ::::::::::::: - ~"~r' ..;::=:._..:: "-
:::::::~ ti,'( ~~ 'Ul' '. ." . ., .::::::::::::: - '-:,"/' ~~ P
........~ .' ." '-~.. ).. {j '" ! MULJI FAMILY SITE - ~ ~ - _ " . ;:~ ~\: \ \ I
-=l ;~'(ib. iDol C..:=- _ :.~ RESIDENTIAL .~.1!~ #?l~<h~~ .~~. ~~~.
?OIT~ '("~ :.~. !.. ., ::~::::::::.~~~\\"Vy I~ . ~.... ~t
i F\C' . _. . ::~ " '~"AGRICULTURAL 8I:I..I:IL
,. ~. ~ ~~. -~:?:~..; II. S' (MOBILE HO. MES) ::::::::::::::: ~ ariffi..' .- EEffi3~ ':f= .-.- .'
, , ,...../" /.' 'j - ............... ~ . -I--
-I ,...... f'o...... .~:-;' -= ' 10"" _- ................ . I-- 1
~ _ _~~' ""'II' - . .............. -1 :.. .' . -~:
~ . f '.~' i . ::::::::::::::..... I I '~Il ,"l'p j"'II\'Vli11i11l
: ~ ~! ~ '. I ._...., '. . .............. I
I I ., i i I . . I I .. ~4' . ..... _ .... _._._._,.."....--..~.........-:________,.~:~~ ---: - ....1.&
-:-.~rl'~-.:7:':':::::-:';;'::;;':::::::"~::;;~:'-:-"':'''lci~'' . '1111 II I II rill ~. l \JACANT 1
......~....~~............._............................... o::.!. "111'11' \', ". ~ ., .'~'
.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: i -.;.. 1 SINGLE FAMILY \,:1! ' ..... "'<<',.
'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:: I'~ ~~ !-. RESIDENTIAL~: II - , ,.......
:;;].................. ._.:::::.....:........:~...:~:.::::..::. ..~~ ~!g~.y<,:;~~ --f"i ~, , . i '.
---rt"'r--- .... .. i"-L I "\ 'M ,~~ bY; : ! ~
.. , l. ......,. -i"+!j=- i.....-<\ XO'fl-4"1 ..J' . _ ~ =
1 L_ '~~'.,';'f . ~: 'J , r . -=
1 /8 MI LE'SV ~ ~ l~:I'fm'''. W lifT 'iffrifi'i' .~; ~! I
IIII II . . ...:'.' ..,i\,*i~;[~~. -
400. 800 FEET '.' :..-:.~...~.,~..:... ';'. . :.....,. ~
P/..AI\/NIN r. Of'E.Pr. 02/48 .'. .~.~'.~t:. .v. :i'.~~'~, "'-::;'.":' . . ...'
.i....~. ~ --. f''''' ':..,:.'.;j~ .i..~.;..,:W...::...... l~ III :,1.. Iii "
-"~1f~~ r"'~-:'..-:.:. ... --~ '~l~rjlr;-I2\'1 -::I~:;:-- ~.fj 1*
'1':~::u~~__nH"'" ....... .... I -_-_____ I~ "'T J,."..fi) . __~~'.:._~~'J.:~;4j,f..~~~.~~ t~
~ > '.
.. ~ :
- .... , --.
" . \.," "':-;.
'...... ..
'!"" 10.-:
..........
....
South Florida \Vater Management District
3301 Gun Cub Road, West Palm Beach, Aorida33406 · (561) 686-8800. FL WATS 1-800-432-2045
.'} TDD (561) 697-2574
Maroh .16, 1-998
MtR 2 3 1998
i
.d
@J~
, \.P Co
~
(j
GOV 08-28
rn
rn @ rn u WI ~ !-~~\,
"~;i1
RPM SSP
PLAN Pr.OCESSING TEAM
Ray Eubanks, Planning Manager
Plan Review and DR! Processing Team
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
Subject:
Preliminary Review Recommendation
City of Boynton Beach, DCA # 98-1
The South Florida Water Management District staff has reviewed 1;he subject document. We do not
recommend that a formal review of the proposed amendments he Wldertaken. If you have any
questions or require additional information, please call me at (561) 687-6779.
Sincerely,
~M~
P.K. Sharma, AICP
Senior Planner
Lower East Coast Planning Division
Planning Department
PKS/mh
c:
Michael Busha, TCRPC
Tambri Heyden, Boynton Beach
Roger Wilburn, DCA
G"verning Board:
Frank vVilliamson, Jr., Chairman
Eugene K. Pettis, Vice Chairman
Mitchell W, Berger
Vera M. Carrer
William E. Graham
\Villiarn Hammond
Richard A. M..chek
Michael D, Minton
Miriam Singer
Samuel E, Poole III, Executive Director
Michael Slayton, Deputy Executive Director
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Office 01 the Secretary
Office 01 International Relations
Division of Administrative Services
Division of Corporations
Division of Cultural Affairs
MEMBER OF THE FLORIDA CABINET
Division 01 library &r Information Services
Division 01 Historical Resources
Ringling Museum of Art
Division 01 Ucensing
Division 01 Bections
l?
@)
E:-~
./'"
;>
Re: Historic Preservation Review of the City of Boynton Beach (98-1) Compreh~'ive
Plan Amendment Request
FLORIDA DEPARIMENf OF STATE
Sandra B. Mortham
Secretary of State
DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES
April l~illr ~:~~;:I~-
I
fiPM 8SP
PLAN PF:OCESSING TEAM
MLRay Eubanks . __ --
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of State Planning
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
According to this agency's responsibilities under sections 163.3177 and 163.3178, Florida Statutes, and
Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, we have reviewed the above document to decide if data regarding
historic resources have been given sufficient consideration in the request to amend the Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan.
The three proposed Future Land Use Map amendments were reviewed to consider the potential effects of these
actions on historic resources. While our cursory review suggests that the }>roposed changes may have no
adverse effects on historic resources, it is the city's responsibility to ensure that the proposed revisions will not
have an adverse effect on significant archaeological or historic resources in Boynton Beach. In particular,
changes involving increased density or intensity of existing land uses of tracts should be checked to see if any
known or potential historic resources, both archaeological sites or historic structures, would be affected by
these actions. The most effective way to guarantee that historic properties are not damaged is for the city to
sponsor historic resource surveys so that it can ensure its archaeological resources will be considered if any
substantive changes in land use are proposed. .
In sum, it is our opinion that the amended comprehensive plan meets (although kno""n and potential historic
resources need to be carefully considered in the planning phases of proposed land use changes) the state of
Florida's requirements as promulgated in sections 163.3177 and 163.3178, F.S., and Chapter 9J-5, F.A.C.,
regarding the identification of kno""n historical resources within their specified area of jurisdiction, and for the
establishment of policies, goals and objectives for addressing known and potentially significant historical
resources in Bo)nton Beach.
If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free to contact Susan M. Harp or Laura
Kammerer of the Division's Compliance Review staff at (850) 487-2333.
Sincerely,
~tl.
if
George W. Percy, Director
Division of Historical Resources
DIRECTOR'S OFFICE
R.A. Gray Building · 500 South Bronough Street · Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 · (850) 488-1480
FAX: (850) 488-3353 · WWW Address http://www.dos. state.B.us
o ARCHAEOLCX;lCAL RESEARCH ~STORIC PRESERVATION 0 HISTORICAL MUSEUMS
(850) 487-2299 · FAX: 414-2207 (850) 487-2333 · FAX: 922-0496 (850) 488-1484 · FAX: 921-2503
South Florida Water Management District
3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 · (561) 686-8800 . FL W A TS 1-800-432-2045
i"J TDD (561) 697-2574
~( :~~~~~
RPM B3r
'UN prOCE.SS!NG 1"Ef\M
----@
~~
~
GOY 08-28
April 27, 1998
Ray Eub~, Planning Manager
Plan RevIew and DRI Processing Team
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
Subject:
Proposed Amendment Comments
City of Boynton Beach, DCA # 98-1
The South Florida Water Management District staff h' .
have no water resource related comments If : reVIewed the. sU?Ject docwnent and we
information, please call me at (561) 687-6779. you ave any questIOns or require additional
Sincerely,
fk~
....-
P .K. Sharma, AICP
Senior Planner
Lower East Coast Planning Division
Planning Department
PKS/mh
c:
Michael Busha, TCRPC
Tambri Heyden, Boynton Beach
Roger Wilburn, DCA
Governing Board:
Frank Williamson, Jr., Chairman
Eugene K. Pettis, Vice Chairman
Mitchell W. Berger
Vera M. Carter
William E. Graham
William Hammond
Richard A. Machek
Michael D. Minton
Miriam Singer
Samuel E. poole Ill, Executive Director
Michael Slayton, Deputy Executive Director
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach. FL 33416-4680
-- ~------------ ----- --~ ---- ~- --
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(;
3400 WEST COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD
FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33309-3421
(954) 777-4593
DIVISION OF
PLANNING AND PROGRAMS
11I0MAS r. IIAIUlY; Jr.
SI!CRETAIn'
1A1ITO" calLES
OOVEMOK
May 1, 1998
@
10
~
~
.' 6 ,,~,)~ '
~ ~ . '. .. - :..........,1 .... ~
, ." \
.'~ -_J
Mr. Ray Eubanks ~ " ~~~~~:(",:,~::_,.
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of State Planning
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENT COMMENTS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT: City of Boynton Beach
DCA Amendment #: 98-1
The Department has reviewed the documents supporting the proposed Non EAR-based
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments for the City of Boynton Beach. Our objections,
recommendations and comments for the proposed amendments are attached.
Smcerely,
J!JtbOCk. P.E.
District Director
Planning and Programs
JMY:rr
Enclosures
cc: B. Romig, FDOT Central Office
R. Wilburn, DCA
G. Schmidt, FDOT
J. Anderson, FDOT
DISTRICT 4, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, & COMMENTS
RESPONSffiLE DIVISION/BUREAU:
NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE MEMORANDUM RECEIVED FROM DCA:
REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS:
Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
03/02/98
04/03/98
05/05/98
ELEMENT; Future Land Use
Non-EAR Based Amendment (#98-1)
#1 First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach (LUAR 97-002)
RULE DEFICIENCY:
9J-5.006(2)(a)
OBJECTION: The traffic study included for this amendment did not address the impact of project traffic on
1-95 (SR-9), a Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS) facility. Although project traffic does not directly
access 1-95, it is distributed to both Boynton Beach Boulevard and Woolbright Road which have interchanges
with 1-95. The level of service (LOS) on 1-95 was not analyzed with and without the proposed amendment.
The section ofI-95 between Woolbright Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard is designated "Maintain" status.
Maintain means that continuing operating conditions at a level such that significant degradation does not occur
based on conditions existing at the time of local government comprehensive plan adoption. Significant
degradation means anything over a 10% increase in average daily two-way traffic or a 10% reduction in
operating speed in the peak direction.
RECOMMENDATION: Analyze the level of service (LOS) on 1-95 with and without the proposed
amendment. Check the 1989 Comprehensive Plan to compare whether the 10% increase from 1989 has been
exceeded. If the project negatively impacts 1-95 and the 10% increase has been exceeded, mitigation should
be discussed.
REVIEWED BY:
Gustava Schmidt, P.E.
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
REVIEWED BY:
Renee Rosselot
REVIEWED BY:
John Anderson, AICP
1
DISTRICT 4, DEJ;ARTMENf OF TRANSPORTATION
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, & COMMENTS
RESPOl' . SIBLE DIVISION/BUREAU:
NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM LOCAL --(j()VERNMENT:--- --
DATE MEMORANDUM RECEIVED FROM DCA:
REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS:
Plannine and Zonine
City of Boynton Beach
03/02/98
04/03/98
05/05/98
ELEMENT: Future Land Use
Non-EAR Based Amendment (#98-1)
#1 First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach (LUAR 97-002)
RULE DEFICIENCY:
91-S.006(2)(a)
OBJECTION: The traffic study for this amendment did not address the impacts to the LOS on S.W. 8th
Street. Traffic from the proposed development directly accesses S.W. 8th Street which the City has set a LOS
"C" per Objective 2.1 in the Traffic Circulation Element. S.W. 8th Street proVides a north-south connection
between Boynton Beach Boulevard and Woolbright Road, both of ~hich provide access to 1-95, a FillS
facility. .
RECOMMENDATION: Provide data and analysis which address the average daily and peak hour LOS for
S.W. 8th Street with and without the proposed amendment. Provide volume to capacity data showing that
the proposed development will not negatively impact the City's adopted LOS "C" for S.W. 8th Street.
REVIEWED BY:
Gustava Schmidt. P.E.
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
REVIEWED BY:
Renee Rosselot
REVIEWED BY:
John Anderson, AICP
2
DISTRICT 4, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OBJECTIONS, RECO:MMENDATIONS, & COMMENTS
RESPONSffiLE DIVISION/BUREAU:
NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE MEMORANDUM RECEIVED FROM DCA:
REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS:
Plannin~ and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
03/02/98
04/03/98
05/05/98
ELEMENT: Future Land Use
Non-EAR Based Amendment (#98-1)
#1 First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach (LUAR 97-(02)
RULE DEFICIENCY:
9J-5.006(2)(a)
OBJECTION: The traffic study prepared for this amendment fails to analyze the maximum potential impact
of the proposed land use change to Local Retail Commercial. Uses permitted in this category, including
Shopping Center, would generate significantly more trips than what is currently proposed. This potential
impact may have a negative effect on the adjacent roadways, particularly SHS and FillS facilities. Although
the City indicates an intent to deed restrict the site to the uses proposed by the applicant, the potential still
exists for a more intense development based on the permitted uses allowed in the Local Retail Commercial
category. FDOT notes that the City's Future Land Use Element does include an Office Commercial category
which permits the uses proposed while reducing the maximum potential intensity of development.
RECOMMENDATION: Provide a traffic impact analysis for both peak hour and average daily trips based
on the maximum potential intensity of development with and without the proposed land use amendment.
Analyze the potential impacts to Boynton Beach Boulevard and 1-95 which are SHS and FillS facilities to
ensure that these roads will not be negatively impacted by this amendment. Consider designating the site as
Office Commercial which would not only accommodate the proposed use but would ultimately limit the
intensity of development and enhance potential compatibility with the neighborhood residential character of
the area.
REVIEWED BY:
Renee Rosselot
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
REVIEWED BY:
John Anderson, AICP
REVIEWED BY:
Gustavo Schmidt, P.E.
PHONE: 954-777-4601
3
DISTRICT 4, DE~ARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OBJECTIONS, RECOl\tlMENDATIONS, & COl\1MENTS
RESPONSffiLE DMSION/BUREAU:
NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE MEMORANDUM RECEIVED FROM DCA:
REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS:
Planning and Zoning
City of BQynton Beach
03fe2198 - --- --
04/03/98
05/05/98
ELEMENT: Future Land Use
Non-EAR Based Amendment (#98-1)
#3 Woolbright Place PUD (LUAR 97-0(4)
RULE DEFICIENCY:
9J-5.006(2)(a)
OBJECTION: The amendment application does not provide any data and analysis to support the City's claim
that designating this 66 acre parcel High Density Residential (9.68 - 10.8 dulac) will not negatively impact the
LOS on the affected roadways. No traffic study was provided for this amen~ment.
RECOMMENDATION: Provide a traffic study for this amendment which will address the average daily
and peak trips generated by the existing development on this site and the trips generated by the maximum
allowable density under the proposed High Density Residential land use category. Determine the potential for
any additional impacts on the affected roadways. Provide supporting data which ensures that this amendment
will not adversely impact the LOS on the affected roadways, particularly SHS and FillS facilities.
REVIEWED BY:
Renee Rosselot
PHONE: 954-777-4601
REVIEWED BY:
Gustavo Schmidt, P. E.
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
REVIEWED BY:
John Anderson, AICP
4
DISTRICT 4, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, & COMMENTS
RESPONSIBLE DMSION/BUREAU:
NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE MEMORANDUM RECEIVED FROM DCA:
REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS:
Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
03/02/98
04/03/98
05/05/98
ELEMENT: Future Land Use
Non-EAR Based Amendment (#98-1)
RULE DEFICIENCY:
9J-5.019
OBJECTION: The City of Boynton Beach has not replaced the Traffic Circulation Element with a
Transportation Element. Consequently, for review purposes~ only the outdated Traffic Circulation Element
is available for reference.
RECOMMENDATION: Prepare and adopt a new Transportation Element as required. Include updated
data and analysis and updated Future Transportation Element maps depicting existing and projected LOS
which reflect the future land use plan as amended. '
REVIEWED BY:
Gustavo Schmidt, P.E.
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
REVIEWED BY:
Renee Rosselot
REVIEWED BY:
John Anderson. AICP
5
DISTRICT 4, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OBJECTIONS, RECO:MMENDATIONS, & COMMENfS
RESPONsmLE DIVISION/BUREAU:
NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE MEMORANDUM RECEIVED FROM DCA:
REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS:
Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
03/02/98
04/03/98
05/05/98
ELEMENT: Future Land Use
Non-EAR Based Amendment (#98-1)
#2 Foster Property (LUAR 97-(03)
RULE DEFICIENCY:
9J-5.006(4)
OBJECTION: The submittal did not provide an amended Future Land Use Map showing the proposed official
designations of the annexed parcel or the new jurisdictional boundaries of the City.
RECOMMENDATION: Provide an updated and amended Future Land Use Map showing the City's new
boundaries and the official designations for the annexed parcel. ·
REVIEWED BY: Renee Rosselot
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
REVIEWED BY: John Anderson, AICP
REVIEWED BY: Gustavo Schmidt, P.E.
6
DISTRICT 4, DEPMTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OBJECTIONS, RECO:M:MENDATIONS, & COl\1MENTS
RESPONSffiLE DMSION/BUREAU:
NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE MEMORANDUM RECEIVED FROM DCA:
REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS:
Plannini: and Zoning
City of BQynton Beach
03/02/98
04/03/98
05/05/98
ELEMENT: Future Land Use
Non-EAR Based Amendment (#98-1)
#1 First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach (LUAR 97-(02)
RULE DEFICIENCY:
CO:MM:ENT: The traffic analysis provided for this amendment is not consistent with the development
proposal as it was finally approved by the City Commission on January 20, 1998. The original proposal
provided for a 120 bed nursing home, a 60 bed ACLF and 67,500 square feet of Medical Office. The applicant
revised their proposal~ reducing the Medical Office use to 39,700 square feet, which was approved by the
Commission. Although the reduction in square footage for Medical Office use will also reduce the number of
trips generated, the traffic study should be revised to reflect this change.
REVIEWED BY: Renee Rosselot
PHONE: 954-777-4601
REVIEWED BY: John Anderson~ AICP
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
REVIEWED BY: Gustava Schmidt, P.E.
7
DISTRICT 4, D;t:PARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, & COMMENTS
RESPONsmLE DIVISION/BUREAU:
NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE MEMORANDUM RECEIVED FROM DCA:
REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS:
Plannin& and Zonin&
City of Boynton Beach
03102/98
04/03/98
05/05/98
ELEMENT: Future Land Use
Non-EAR Based Amendment (#98-1)
#1 First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach (LUAR 97-002)
RULE DEFICIENCY:
COMMENT: The traffic analysis provided for this amendment does not specifically identify the ITE land use
categories or codes which were used in the peak hour trip generation analysis. Future analyses should specify
lTE land use categories and codes to determine trip generation rates for existing and proposed land use
designations. Also, the traffic analysis used Palm Beach County Engineering trip generation rates to determine
average daily trips and lTE to determine peak trips. To maintain a consistent analysis, FOOT recommends
that the ITE Trip Generation Manual be used to determine both average daily and peak hour project trips.
REVIEWED BY:
Gustava Schmidt, P.E.
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
REVIEWED BY:
Renee Rosselot
REVIEWED BY:
John Anderson, AICP
8
DISTRICT 4, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, & COMMENTS
RESPONSffiLE DIVISION/BUREAU:
NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE MEMORANDUM RECEIVED FROM DCA:
REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS:
Plannin~ and Zonin~
City of Boynton Beach
03/02/98
04/03/98
05/05/98
ELEMENT: Future Land Use
Non-EAR Based Amendment (#98-1)
#1 First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach (LUAR 97-002)
#3 Woolbright Place PUD (LUAR 97-(04)
RULE DEFICIENCY:
COMMENT: The amendment back-up provided failed to adequately explain the connection between these
two amendments. Both sites are located in the Woolbright Place PUD, which is the subject ofa settlement
agreement pursuant to Tradewinds v. City of Boynton Beach. The removal of the 14 acre Church site, from
the PUD is apparently one factor in the redesignation ofthe 66 acre site from Residential Moderate Density
to Residential High Density. The relationship between the two amendments, particularly regarding density
allocation, is difficult to ascertain. It is recommended that additional information be provided in tabular fonn
which would show the designation, allocation and density for each land use included in the Woolbright Place
PUD, both existing and proposed by these two amendments.
REVIEWED BY:
Gustavo Schmidt, P.E.
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
REVIEWED BY:
Renee Rosselot
REVIEWED BY:
John Anderson, AICP
9
DISTRICT 4, DWARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, & COMMENTS
RESPONSIBLE DMSION/BUREAU:
NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE MEMORANDUM RECEIVED FROM DCA:
REQUIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS:
Plannine and Zonille
City of Boynton Beach
03/02/98
04/03/98
05/05/98
ELEMENT: Future Land Use
Non-EAR Based Amendment (#98-1)
RULE DEFICIENCY:
COl\1MENT: The location maps provided for the amendment sites do not clearly label the adjacent roadways.
Amendment site location maps which clearly label the adjacent and surrounding roadways should be provided
with all site-specific land use amendment applications.
REVIEWED BY:
Gustavo Schmidt, P.E,
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
PHONE: 954-777-4601
REVIEWED BY:
Renee Rosselot
REVIEWED BY:
John Anderson, AICP
10
Lawton Chilts
Governor
- Fax:904-922-53 May S '98 15:21 P.01/02
I
,
I
Depart~ent. of
Enviro~,men~1 P.Fotection
Ma-jory Stoneman Ooualu Buildini
3900 Corrmony..ealch Bou,!evard V,rginia 5. Wetherell
Tallahusl'. FIC?rida 32399;-3000 Sel;recary ,
.. . I I :l '
; .
! .
,
1
I. .
1
I
.1
.J
'j
;l
.~
.DR FAX ~SMlITAL POul; ,
PHONE:
SuNCOM:
FAX:
DATE:
TO:
904-488-0784
278-0784
904-922-5380
-----'
! '
I '
ORGANIZATION
r-
(( ~5
FAX#:
PHONE #;
, .
;
I
i :
! ~
1 .
I
I
. 1 ;. "
IF iANY PAGES ARE NOTCLEARLY.RECBIVEI?~ PLEASE CALL THE PERSON
LISTED ABOVE. .. j .
I '
:l ,
~[: '
COMME1\~S:
.1
i
i.
:!
,r
:
"
i ~
: j
'."-"~tCI, Conserve ond 1'i1(l'l~ge F/oridcr's j:"vifOI1:T\~'lt and Na;vrQ! F~SotJr'es"
I 1- .
,,~ M t' ''P''
I. I ~ ., I,
~~~~~~~tJi"
-- J:"ax:904-'?22-53 May 8 '38 15:22
Departinent of
Environmen~1 Protection
P.02/02
~wton Chil~
Go_rnor
"Marjory Stone(na~ Douglas ~ildi"g
3900 Common"eaJth Boulevard
T a"ahus... Ronda 32J~.3000
I' " .
., .
Vlrgifli~ B. W~c1'1eri!U
Secrcury
l~ay 8, 1998
, .
"!:
Mr. D. RAy Eubanks
Department of Community Affairs.
Bureau of Local Planningl"
2~5S Shumard Oak Boulevard i 1 ;
Tillabusee,-Florida 3239S>-2100 .; i'!:
. 'I '
oRe: Propo~Ameodment to theBP~~BeKh ~rehensive Plan, DCA 98-1
Dear Mr. Eubanks:' ; : . If.
.., J (:
, . The Offiee. of Intergovernmenl81 I*~' drthe Department of Environmental
Protection has reviewed theaoovc-iefererlced am~ under the required provisions of ';
Chapter 163, .partIl, Florida Statutes. ~:Cnapter19-J-5 and 9J..l1, Florida Administrative COde.
. ~': :f .; ! ;
Our .comments and l'ecommenda~~ are pn!JVided to assist your agency in developin,gthe
state's response. ;, 1. :/ I !
llllIIlber r::~m:;:~"~:::~~ ~=$:;\a;
been stated that aNo(theseamenoltlCAtll.t..Would;not cause the adopted levels of servIce .
standards to be exceeded," there haS~:no.analySls of the an1icipated increase in water and: .
~astewatet demand to be placed pri.,thoSeS}'Stems,;;Jt is recommended .that an anal~sis of the , '
tncrease4 demand on potable water ipc!,samtary sewer systems be prOVIded as requIred.
PJeascfcall me at (8S0) 487.223-1 rryou hav:e any questions about this response..
, .,
"
'i Sincerely,
I. ,/) / !
!';j, I .t--7~( !
lIW~l,~ \/ ---:-----
jRobert W. HaD
! . Office of .Intergovernmental
: Programs
I
I '
., :
, .
I
i
I
I .
Ii
Ii
. p " .,' -, II. ~: I..'" ..
. }'O:C-:~. '.f.')'I-.:t'l'\iP n~. tdC."age 1-;O(jC'~ 5 ';:'fJ","rb;,..-y,~nL -:;P(. 'v:1GU"C.1 ...:~st:..~:r:..'_"..
. .
. i
~ ,~
Pr,n~d 0" _;cled /,opel".
I, II ;
treQlure
co~t
regional
planniQg
council
April 17, 1998
Mr. Tom Beck, Chief
Bureau of Local Planning
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Subject: City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan
Draft Amendments - DCA Reference No. 98-1
Dear Mr. Beck:
Corm
. .-----4--
*', ~/L- ~'lv;'>:'
- 1u6-' Ji / L ~f.//~}
rVV-7 ([U-c.k.
~/....A...{}
- () b."{+ &r~ ~
~ L..kAfL_
'~! 'I:' ~ U W ~1~.
I \illl APR 2 0 1998 \~
PLANNING /l.ND
ZONING DEPT.
Council has reviewed the above-referenced amendments in accordance with the
requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes and the Council's adopted plans, policies
and review procedures. Enclosed is a copy of our report as approved by the Council at its
regular meeting on April 17, 1998 pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes.
If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
!:l~;:;;-
Planning Director
TLH/lg
Enclosure
~: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
301 east ocean boulevard
suite 300
stuart, florlda 34994
phone (561) 221-4060
_sc 26!:4060 fax (~61) 221-4067
April 17, 1998
treQlure
. co~t
regional
planning
council
Ms. Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Subject: City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan
Draft Amendments - DCA Reference No. 98-1
~'f\" ,
Dear M~den:
Pursuant to the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and
Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the Council reviewed
the above-referenced comprehensive plan amendments at its meeting on April 17 , 1998.
A review report was approved by the Council for transmittal to the Department of
Community Affairs as required by Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. A copy of the
approved report is attached for consideration by your governing body prior to adoption of
the amendments. Council will consider your response to any objections or comments
contained in this report as an important factor in making a consistency recommendation
on the adopted amendments.
Please send one copy of all materials related to these amendments directly to our office
once they are adopted by your governing body, pursuant to Chapter 9J-ll, Florida
Administrative Code.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
fL-. e fL -"
Te~ L. ~ess, AICP
Planning Director
TLH:lg
Attachment
301 sast ocean boulevard
suite 300
stuart, florlda 34994
phone (561) 221-4060
n _ se 269-40~ fa!J561) 221-~67
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
To:
Council Members
AGENDA ITEM 4B
From: Staff
Date: April 17 , 1998 Council Meeting .
Subject: Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review
Draft Amendments to the City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan
DCA Reference No. 98-1
Introduction
The Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act,
Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, requires that the Council review local government
comprehensive plan amendments prior to their adoption. Under the provisions of this
law, the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) prepares an Objections,
Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report on a proposed amendment only if
requested to do so by the local government, the regional planning council, or an affected
person, or if an ORC Report is otherwise deemed necessary by the DCA. If the local
government requests DCA to prepare an ORC Report, then the Council must provide
DCA with its own objections, recommendations for modification and comments on the
proposed amendment within 30 days of its receipt.
BacklZI'ound
The City of Boynton Beach has proposed three amendments to its Future Land Use Map .
(pLUM). ImorriIation on the properties which are subject to the proposed amendments is
provided in Table 1 and the location of each property is shown on the attached maps:
The City has not requested a formal review of the proposed amendments, concluding that
the amendments are consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and that adopted level
of service standards will not be exceeded. However, on March 27, 1998, the DCA
notified the City that a formal review would be carried out.
(
(
Table 1
City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Map Amendments
DCA Reference No. 98-1
;~~~~,--1[-~i';,.:! . - . -':~~~T;~,I~ 1r:.~
lf~~1rt!....". , . '~I '," _.~ \ ~- ~ -,
~ ~ 1!.. ~ ,r. . tt ~;:\~>~ "'-' ::-.
; ~ ~,..~ ._-....,;L_. . . . .n_~~~_ '- .
# 1 14.2 Medium Density, Local Retail Northwest quadrant of intersection of
Residential Commercial Woolbright Road and 1-95
#2 23.0 Medium Low Density Northeast quadrant of intersection of
Residential-5 · Residential Miner Road and Lawrence Road
#3 66.2 Moderate Density High Density Northwest quadrant of intersection of
Residential Residential Woolbright Road and 1-95
Total Acreage 103.4
· Palm Beach County FLUM Designation. Property recently annexed.
Evaluation
Amendments # 1 & 3 are evaluated together because they are part of the same original
PUD and are located adjacent to each other, in the northwest quadrant of the intersection
of Wood bright Road and 1-95. The property in Amendment # 1 is presently vacant, and
is surrounded by a stormwater retention lake to the north, a shopping center and
restaurant to the south, single-family detached homes to the west and an apartment
complex (part of amendment # 3) and vacant land to the east. FLUM Designations are
Medium Density Residential to the north, west and east, and Local Retail Commercial to
the south.
Amendment # 3 includes lands which have already been developed for residential
purposes (both apartments and single-family homes). Surrounding land uses include
single-family detached homes to the north and west, some vacant land and a shopping
center to the south, and vacant land and the rights-of-way for a rail line and 1-95 to the
east. Surrounding FLUM designations include Low Density Residential to the north,
Medium Density Residential to the west, Local Retail Commercial to the south, and High
Density Residential to the east.
The property in amendment # 1 belongs to a religious organization which envisioned the
construction of a church and school on site. However, the organization elected to
maintain its church and related facilities at its downtown location and the subject
property is now to be used for a health care "campus," with a nursing home, an adult
congregate liviI].g facility and a medical office building. Since office uses are not
permissible in a residential district, the City proposes to apply a designation of Local
Retail Commercial to this property. The City indicates that the proposed uses are
compatible with surrounding uses and that the City Housing Element promotes the
approval of adult congregate living facilities if compatible with the neighborhood.
Although the City Comprehensive Plan recommends against designation of additional
2
land as Local Retail Commercial, the proposed use qualifies as an exemption because of
its nature.
The property in amendment # 3 is subject to a settlement agreement between the City and
a PUD developer. According to City staff, the controversy leading to the settlement
agreement had to do with development of the commercial property to the south
(originally under joint ownership) and the overall residential density to be permitted.
Under the settlement agreement, the developer has the authority to build 687 units, but
the existing FLUM designation would allow only 479 units. There are no actual impacts
as a result of this amendment, since the 66 acres is already entirely developed. The-
proposed designation more accurately reflects the actual density as developed.
Amendment # 2 is a 23 acre parcel presently used for agricultural purposes. Its existing
FLUM designation is Medium Residential-5, a County designation. The property is
being annexed by the City. Surrounding land uses include single-family residential
homes to the north, east, and south, although a canal and right-of-way buffer the property
to the south. A mobile home park is located to the west. Surrounding FLUM
designations are Low Density Residential to the north, south and east, and Medium
Residential-5 (County designation) to the west. The City designation would allow a few
less units then the County designation, if developed to the maximum density.
Extrajurisdictional Impacts
The amendments were reviewed through the Palm Beach Intergovernmental Plan
Amendment Review Committee Process in December of 1997. According to the
Clearinghouse Coordinator, no objections were received regarding the proposed
amendments.
Effects on Regional Resources or Facilities
There would appear to be no significant effects on regional resources and facilities as a
result of these amendments.
Objections, Recommendations for Modification,. and Comments
A. Objections
1. None
B. Comments
1. The proposed land uses in amendment #. 1 provide a positive change to the
existing land use mix of the area. However, Council staff questioned the City
regarding the designation of Local Retail Commercial, since no retail uses are
proposed. The City's response was that Local Retail Commercial allowed for the
proposed office use, that existing land designated as Local Retail Commercial was
'.
3
located adjacent to the south, and that the City did not desire to "spot" a new
designation at this location. Given the City's acknowledged overabundance of
land designated for local retail commercial use, it would seem to be more prudent
to establish a new FLUM category entitled Medical Facilities or Institutional
Medical.
Recommendation
Council should adopt the above comments and approve their transmittal to the
Department of Community Affairs.
Attachments
4
A(:~fiO:.
'Ii
f!. &. . i':;'
~ .' ';Jj
~.
, STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
~
"Helping Floridians create safe, vibrant, sustainable communities. . .
LAWTON CHILES
Governor
JAMES F. MURLEY
Secretary
March 27, 1998
Honorable Jerry Taylor, Mayor
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
R ,.. ~~ .... '\ ...
. f"u . ~'ra .. I ~
L.--\. -t '; l.......D
- ........'CC'...:f. . k2
Dear Mayor Taylor:
MAR 8 0 199B
TF(EAsUR;: L-f"! ",'-
pl&J'\Nt.J'N'-::-'.:.: i-:~:;.!Jt.;AL
4 ~~ ~ ".Jv:'~:!L
The Department has conducted a preliminary review of the City's proposed
comprehensive plan amendment received on March 2, 1998, DCA Reference No. 98-1.
The Department has detennined that the proposed plan amendment should be fonnally
reviewed for consistency with the minimum criteria contained in Chapter 163, Florida Statutes
(F.S.), and Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.).
The Department will review the proposed amendment and issue an Objections,
Recommendations and Comments Report in accordance with Chapter 163, F.S., and Rule 9J-5,
F.A.C.
If you have any questions~ please contact Bernard Piawah, Planning Manager overseeing.
the review of the amendment, at (850) 487-4545.
Sincerely,
CM~,J~ ~.
Charles Gauthier, AICP
Growth Management Administrator
Bureau .of Local Planning
CGlbp
cc: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP, Planning & Zoning Director
Michael Busha, AICP, Executive Director, Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council
flOII)Alm
At& cI CriIiaI_ c- field OIfa
21')60.-......,. _112
Mnhon. Florida J3OSD-2227
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORID-\.32399.2100
Phone: 8S0.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 8S0.921.07811Suncom 291.0781
I nternet address: http://www.state.fl.us/comaff/dc.a: html
CI&N "'MIll
IWidCrilial_ c-n fieldOlilr
155 bit s....Iin
s.tow. Florida 338lO-4Ml
SOUTH FlOIlOA llCDVEIYoma
1'.0. Be. 41122
IlOl N.W. 36Ih Sft!l
~~ . M ' D- -'
~';' \ South F.1o -- ",da \Vater anagel,cA.ent lstrlct
. ",,~.._~,.i, . ! 3301 Gun Qub Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 · (561) 686-8800' FL WATS 1-800-432-2045
11)1)(561)697-2574
GOV 08-28
- ,... r:'" 1r:.'D
RlI. ~ l'~'< V t::.
~ ~.....t
. t.a
\'V\R 'loS '99t\
. n!'"....'--.~~
. .",- !"i\f~~ ,.. .'
- - :- .... n.,...... . "'I
-\-...\..~~l,.",~,...:-.... ._ . ~'. .0".;"' \~
. ,.... . , ;,;~~ 1" . \..,..Jw\ ",w
rV\:'~I~" ...;.;1
March 16, 1998
Ray Eubanks, Planning Manager
Plan Review and DR! Processing Team
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Dear Mr, Eubanks:
Subject:
Preliminary Review Recommendation
City of Boynton Beach, DCA # 98-1
The South Florida Water Management District staff has reviewed the subject document. we do not
recommend that a formal review of the proposed amendments be wuiertaken, If you have any
questions or require additional information, please call me at (561) 687-6779.
Sincerely,
~
P.K. Sharma, AICP
Senior Planner
Lower East Coast Planning Division
Planning Department
PKS/mh
c:
Michael Busha, TCRPC
Tambri Heyden, Boynton Beach
Roger Wilburn, DCA
GfNn7Iing BDilTd:
Frank Williamson, Jr., Chairman
Eugene K. Pettis, Vice Chairman
Mitchell W. Berger
Vera M. Carter 6
William E, Graham
William Hammond
Richard A. Machek
Michael D. Minton
Miriam Singer
Samuel E. Poole ill, Executive Director
Michael Slayton, Deputy Executive DirectOr
MailingAddrcss: P.O. Bax24680, WcstPalm Beach, FL33416-4680
~
~-
~
~~
~
1
~ .. . ....."
.
8
:~~:::~ ;::~~:_~';-_:\< :: '::':::;.::{~~~;~~:,
.... ..
\
. ~, \.."i
(
-~'jRE LA.\jO USE
ITEM #2---11
H=+H'I:;
ru
:.; I' ;..
!I
,
1-. ._. ~.., pct,l./xo a.:..
~"':l 'I - h'~~ 'D. ; Co.i ~"'L -. .:'~ ~ ~~:.~ ,-'
/-' -;~ ~~
- -1 ..
~:=
, ~-
i.. _.-.,_.
~O""'"
..tiC
--...<~
-
~1_
,,-
-.- ~
-..... ~
=j U J..:;j ;!J~./J;J.,,- I~....~ a
~~t1;~/ :~'~~r I~f Z":'~".. ',' L~: '..~:'\<'
-- :-:!:~ ~\,.,:' .' . ..(' J~~':~,J:;1= ~: !,:-, ... '... ;;.:.:':iVJ ~\~:t'
- ~ ~ . - . - X:::"~A>>-~'~~.";':; ..
. :1 'Y- . = :;,...... "",
Ii! ,,~'\.:( ',\ ~\~ \\' \J,i~f . - I'" Y . ;.:E :;::,;. ',< '.. :;.: ~..'
'---,~ (~r-*~~~ ~ . L~..~..._'.~.'.,~,.~_'~J~i-~
ttrr--'- - nrn' . ~ ~ '. ". ' '~":<;m~.
~ l/'" i.i Ii,:! I j: I '- """---. '>:;;:,~ ,~.J;HI~; r.. ",,~~;'
::Jl ... ; intJl ~ ~~ .. . '": W DENS":" RESI~~~L '
l, rt:i~ >....;;:~/ '(ZJ' ~~. .:~;,.,.' .. ....::.,::,.:,,;:
I ff1{~I~>i: ~'3.i!f: I' 1= !5fi~it~iDr;"'; "lIIn~;; ';'" "
_'''U 0$~\'11 .- ::Ii". :.. " r;'\)_. '. '.-:-- . -.' ... ""~ · i .
': ) .,"'"'" r:L", ',,~ I.. ...:.:=..' ...~.._ ", _' ::. ~,',. .:~.,>;';" ,.
: 'f ......;;~;;;t i' . ,IT ~ ....~.lF.~~;t1F: ~....: " ,.t4-" ~
"~'r/ ~J \'"'~\ I I I t..]", ~~.-::~:t.tEi:il(;.;;;;un:,.::~:~~'>~ '.~ "i :": !t;~k'
~')f:"7'"1 ,.,~ _~. :t. C.I. r. - PALM BEACH COUNlY~;':' /,-,,>, . .."",: '.
. ,.... --; J ,J!.,.. .. fr' ,.;.. !,~ RESIDENTIAL -51" :;~~ iTEM #2~.\.i ~ .:~ ~ .~v't'
..\C~--... I ~ ...............~. 'SITE~:~.'ro<:...,^' ,~~
.... '""'l1lI . , .,'.' .~....~::;;. ." _~ 1'00.... , .'. . ....w, ".,
r'. ~~. '>..J: "Y'::':'="~:.::: -~.,/.:: .~;~:...:~. .?~.-' ~ ;''''f:-. ." . .. ..
. .' :/}~.I.;; f~ 1'-' .....-:.. ...,. . ,x , : rtI:) '. :. .;, 'i.
~;~ ~. <~;.) ~ffffih~l.~ ,.... .,,:,~~ ~M_ .'''r:'\~2~~~~.;.:.:~.~~~..:.:.~~:
=-~- ~';,~m ;.- -.. ------1 '-~!~~~E~~)~A::,r.j..j~~~~~~~~:;;'~
:f~T';::' ~ ~ ~ , . .: ,.:.:
~~~. .' ~~ ;;;~~E3-'~: .1.... . ~.~. dl -J --I,"~,. ~ I. R~_~~;:~"'JT.I,..~~E'A!,~n~::1~II--'-:"'~ '~:~. .: : -1mmmmrm: ::
',...... -')",..-. ..-- ~ V'~" .~~ -- .1- :::::::::::::::::.
-- -- - '. .................
-. \ ~ ~!: '1 - ................. ..
"',,:...... A:'aA2-.__'::':': ;::; ',... ~" I, ~ U.'o'l~~.Jl .:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:. .....
~--- -- I' I ' 1""\ I i i'l j 1 T 1 ................. ...
.~ I I"./'!" I, - Ii- - II · I .................. ....
. .................... ...
~ . ::::::::::::::::::::~::
MI' LESIV ~ U' .. "'--", .... ,:,;:-:::;':.~,;:,:::,;,;:: . ::::.::::::::::::::::;;::
.. .~~ . ....~~..~~.t'~~: . :::::::::::::::::::~*
. - ... ". ,>.~.l~;.,/.,; .....,Z,C:<i<: .....,.>: ::::::::::::::::::::::::
' --' ~'- -, -:'".;.., ".' ::::::::::::::::::::::::
.. ~:., - . .........................
1 f ..\-... ........................
".. . ::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- - ' -."" :".'....": ,..:.:.. . :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
~r. Dz/f'lJ ._..l ,- ... "",~~';\"::;;:;';;L:j.';i~i%:L. ::. :m:II:;:::::!:~:m:m:;:;:~
i ~ ~..;..-.~~~.~,:~. . ~ .
I((]I: ~\ :.:;:.:~~:.:.: . . -. ... "., . . . :
' 1Q Ilt~::~-"~:, -- :~H:~:;:;~ :;:;:~3.:;:;:;::::::::1:~
, ,
....;:;;;,
r--
~,-
--
:~/
- '~...:...~.::.=--r
.....- . "., .....!U~.~~
i'A':.'.'<-'-"" ..... ..!~:::. .~. ~...'
..~-=~.&-;. :.:.: t.m:..!~~ 1;-:.:
~.~..~.. ':.~. .',". ~i~.~'."j.. .....
~:~~.,..~ ..... ;!r!:".'~.t~ e,.,.....
-;......~~.:;-.: '-::':1 ..... .'. .;e.... ....,
~~:~~~~ ::::: :;..c:}'!:;t: .:=:::
.;.:~'!':=;.~::~.~~ ..:.~ ~.:....:.:Z .:.:.
~ -:::.;;':\.~. ~:.:.: :~:'-:.:.. ;':.:
~'''''~'. ~.?'"~ t'.~!I.:.:. .:.:.
;:::::i:..:::::~~t~; .. '::;i~:1~~;: ::;::
~;~:~~~\~. :.:..':':~~': :.:..
:;': '$. '.:f: ", .........-... ...0-:
~'.:~ .:::~:::J!; .:::::
'F"..1-: :t."~!t4'. ~~'...
ii10~~j~ .:*:.~::.~. .:~
.f,~ Ir,~,:.:..:'-~l~':" .:~ ,_:-.~~.
~~:,~t. B - * " .~
'-,. ,~ '. "'Ili.~:~
I !;~,
1-'- - -. . t~:".. -
~'.;'~'. ,.
': ~.
. ;:<':,ir.:.
~:
"':.
:~
.l~':
;:;.i.
"
'I::;
.:. ::1 I,'
.' ~
~
I~..'
. -:......~...
!# ~iiW#.. .
j...
u..,.':~
'".
~
,
,;:':
-,
"':.
:"~1.l
~~~-f
...
~..~...!,:
.
.~~:. .,
',I
<;~
~
toO
.. ,.~~~"~'.
-.. ."t~;.r:fE-"
..; ~~; ~~ .:
:.,.. t.: r-. ~.
1/S
1111 'I
400. 'SOO FEET
PLA "'''''N t:
.............,.-.., ,...--q ~...~
- -" .....~:';' J. . ~I
-, .t="l. .~. . ..
l1"h !t .!r! ';::::J~i..~~ _ _~: . ~
"'--',ti ~
~.
.--".---
-----~
1/8
1111 'I
400. 'SOO FEET
M N : D~~9~ ,..' :':J~f~t:-'''~i~;t~:i4t~Z~::' .:~.t.
, ....,......... -, - -.---
~~ r':.::;;.::;:::):?:~:.:~t?:':.;;~;:::::::::?~It~___' -~~ .~~~~ if i 8:"
...
t.....~ :lP9I&WI
- ~;~;~
:::::::::f:::::
. :~!~~~:
:: :::::::::::t:::::
.::.::r....u
T:rrrt= I
'~~~~~~;~I~,.~~-a.k'.~E ~~ F8i I Im'~
lli..........
t:::::::::
........,
'"tv JJol.. v'" C> r.--<
I j~~~~~~
. ::::::::::F::::::: .
~~~~~~~ri: ~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.......... ........,...........
.......... ....................
....-..... ....................
.......... .....
.~~~~~m~~~~~: II
I!
I
:::::::::::::::::: I
:::::::::::::::::: I
:::::::::::::::::. !
................... I
. ..;....-.... ..~~./ .;~.
r
I
I
(lJ . - '
\.- ...... ,.
. '....... .'''\i
, \,'\ ~~.\, .,
"1.""t\.~'
h..'. at .
....
.;
.. <~. :'.,.,'.::; : .:~:::::r I:;i;t.~~~.::..;:.;;;.:;i.;~~8~~:tr!):
.". .". ~:.
. .,'. ."
. . - ....; ~.. ,..; .;'.~~::.~: . ~ ~-~~.~:.:.". .":
To:
Fax:
From:
Date:
Pages:
From the desk of...
Michael Rumpf
Senior Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 E, Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
561-375-6260
Fax: 561-375-6259
Mark Rickard @ Unruh-Smith & Associates
655-5525
Michael Rumpf
April 2, 1998
2, including cover sheet
RE: Update on State Review of Your Proposed Plan
Amendments
The purpose of this fax is to forward to you the notice
received from the Florida DCA indicating that a review of
our Plan Amendment set numbered 98-1 will be
conducted, including the preparation of an Objections,
Recommendations & Comments Report (aRC). Once
received by the City, this report, or that portion reviewing
those items initiated by this firm, will be forwarded to you
for review and response. The amount of time allocated for
your response will be determined at that time. If you have
questions, do not hesitate to contact me.
DEPARTMENT
..4~~;.
m
t,.: - ~ l ~1
\i!M'" ~;)
~:r.~" : ./
..,~/
STATE OF FLORIDA
OF COMMUNI
i--:\ r; .c;- " - 'r; ;;:I r0-
D I ~ l0 ~ ~,~ Ls ! n j ;
. J i j: i i
Ilfu~ 3 0991 I~'
I p. 'Nl~ s
"Helping Floridians create safe, vibrant, sustainable communities"
LAWTON CHilES
Governor
JAMES F. MURLEY
Secretary
March 27, 199b
i~~t;
~ dr -Iv '!X'A/.
~ 2-!~?lq5'
~ l".ff' (ll.~
:r O$r' L~.lt.rr /-. ~
()J JfJ { r/ /
~-tL ,
Honorable Jerry Taylor, Mayor
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Dear Mayor Taylor:
The Department has conducted a preliminary review of the City's proposed
comprehensive plan amendment received on March 2, 1998, DCA Reference No. 98-1.
The Department has determined that the proposed plan amendment should be formally
reviewed for consistency with the minimum criteria contained in Chapter 163, Florida Statutes
(F.S.), and Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.).
The Department will review the proposed amendment and issue an Objections,
Recommendations and Comments Report in accordance with Chapter 163, F.S., and Rule 9J-5,
F.A.C.
If you have any questions, please contact Bernard Piawah, Planning Manager overseeing
the review of the amendment, at (850) 487-4545.
Sincerely,
~Y-~ ~.
Charles Gauthier, AICP
Growth Management Administrator
Bureau of Local Planning
CG/bp
cc: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP, Planning & Zoning Director
Michael Busha, AICP, Executive Director, Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council
FLORIDA KEYS
Area 01 Crilical State Concern Field Office
27% Overseas Highway, Suite 212
Mar.llhon. Florida JJ050-2227
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100
Phone: 8S0.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 8S0.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781
I nte rnet add ress: http://www.state.fl.us/comaff/dca.htm I
GREIN s\Y AMP
Area 01 Critical Stale Concern Field Office
155 East5umrnerlin
Bartow flo.ida 338JO-4b41
SOUTH FLORIDA RECOVERY OFFlG
P.O. Box 4022
8600 NW. 361h 51reet
Miami. Florida 33159-4022
South Fro!.. la Water Manag~~ ~nt District
3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 · (561) 686-8800' FL WATS 1-800-432-2045
11DI>(561)6~7-2S74
GOV 08-28
oom
U \YJ ~~:
. ij i j
MAR 2 3 I~ ::.J i
March 16, 1998
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
. Ji!-I
~!fr
~-~~~j
~t"'v1
(vS~~ 1)1
. 1))0-0 l . fI,ll
0yS{' ctv
~)-t"
Ray Eubanks, Planning Manager
Plan Review and DRl Processing Team
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
Subject:
Preliminary Review Recommendation
City of Boynton Beach, DCA # 98-1
The South Florida Water Management District stafIhas reviewed the subject document. We do not
recommend that a formal review of the proposed amendments be undertaken. If you have any
questions or require additional information, please call me at (561) 687-6779.
Sincerely,
~~-
P.K. Sharma, AICP
Senior Planner
Lower East Coast Planning Division
Planning Department
PKS/mh
c:
Michael Busha, TCRPC
Tambri Heyden, Boynton Beach
Roger Wilburn, DCA
.4
GO'Verning Board:
Frank Williamson, Jr., Chairman
Eugene K. Pettis, Vice Chairman
Mitchell W. Berger
Vera M. Carter
William E. Graham
William Hammond
Richard A. Machek
Michael D:Minton
Miriam Singer
Samuel E. Poole III, Executive Director
Michael Slayton, Deputy Executive Director
".
.~
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680
treQlure
co~t
regional
planniQg
council
, . rj-uA-
~ Jt?A1lf1> <r 4" If"'
Lv r U,U/C . L"- . ~'
rr ,j "--.f)(F
/ ,r..-t Iii 1._ r .11 r ,Af.--
-0 \" '-.' 41/ p-\....(' I
\ ~Ipi~. 1 iq'
~'({)
~ m n w m (;), ~J ~/~l-%
I ~ /1 r~\l i
.., , IMo lu1l
~ Ljj
March 9, 1998
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPt
,
I
Subject: City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan
Draft Amendments DCA Reference No. 98-1
1~,..",.1
Dear M~yden:
This is to notify you that the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council will be providing a
recommendation to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) on the above-referenced
plan amendments, which we received on 3/6/98.
Council staff will review the amendments for multijurisdictional impacts and impacts on
significant regional resources and facilities and provide a written report to DCA within 30
calendar days of receipt. Staff anticipates presenting its report and recommended comments
to Council at the regular meeting of 4/17/98.
Prior to the Council meeting, Council staff will send you a copy of the meeting agenda and
the staff report and recommendations. We invite you to attend the meeting, where you will
be afforded an opportunity to address the Council. Following the meeting, the
recommendations as approved by the Council will be forwarded to you and to DCA.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
1lJe~
Terry L. Hess, AICP
Planning Director
TLH/jkp
3228 s.w. martin downs blvd.
suite 205 . p.o. box 1529
palm city, florid a 34990
phone (561) 221.4060
se 269.4060 fax (561) 221.4067
..~~-
..r-f. -:.~ :.--
STATE OF FLORIDA
. ..<j
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
"He/ping Floridians create safe, vibrant, sustai.n..e2/e communities"
m @ a' a w Jws,-~':~~r~~a~ ,~-
r /!: '
LAWTON CHILES
Governor
March 3, 1998
m
t.fAR - 5 i998
Ms. Tambri 1. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Teach, FL 33425-0310
. ~"'-"'-'
,
PzLAo NNING AND
NING OEPI
j
Dear Mr. Heyden:
Thank you for submitting copies of your proposed comprehensive plan amendment( s) for
the City. We have conducted a preliminary inventory of the plan amendment package pursuant to
Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, to verify the inclusion of all required materials. Our reference
number for this amendment package is Boynton Beach 98-1.
The submission package appears to be complete, and your proposed plan amendment will
be reviewed pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. Once the review is underway, you may be
asked to provide additional supporting documentation by the review team to ensure a thorough
reVIew.
The Department will conduct a preliminary review to make a determination as to whether
the proposed plan amendment package should be formally reviewed. The Department will notify
you when the determination has been made to review or not to review the proposed plan
amendment package in accordance with Chapter 163.3184 and Rule 9J-11.008, Florida
Administrative Code. The Department's notification shall specifically identify the amendment(s)
that shall be reviewed and the amendments that shall not be reviewed.
If you have any question please contact Roger Wilburn, the Community Program
Administrator that will be overseeing the review of the amendment and assigning the amendment
to the respective planner for review, at (850) 487-4545.
Sincerely,
-a~~
D. Ray Eubanks
Planning Manager
DRE/pcr
cc: Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner
flORIDA KEYS
Area 01 Critical Stale Concern Field Office
2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212
Marathoo, F'orida 33050-2227
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100
Phone: 850.488.8466/Suneom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921,0781/Suneom 291.0781
I nternet add ress: http://www.Slale.fl.usteomafftdea. hIm I
GlliN 'NiAMP
Area of Critical State Concern Field Office
155 East Summerlin
Bartow, Florida 33830-4641
SOUTH FLORIDA RECOVERY OFFICE
P.O. Box 4021
8600 f\ W. 361n 5!,eet
Miami. Florida 33153-1022
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Division of Planning and Zoning
Bulent I. Kastarlak, NCARB
Director
February 23, 1998
Building
Planning & Zoning
Engineering
Occupational License
Community Redevelopment
Mr. Tilford C. Creel, Executive Director
SFWMD
Post Office Box 24680
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-4680
RE: Transmittal of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments - 98-1
Item #1-First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach (lUAR 97-002)
Item #2-Foster Property (lUAR 97-003)
Item #3-Woolbright Place PUD (lUAR 97-004)
Dear Mr. Creel:
Accompanying this letter you will find the City's cover letter and related support documentation as provided to
the Florida Department of Community Affairs which transmits for evaluation four (4) proposed Plan
amendments.
You will recall receiving within a previous amendment package (93-53, December 14, 1993) our entire
Comprehensive Plan and Future land Use Support Document, Section VIII. land Use Problems and
Opportunities. It is my understanding that these documents will be kept current by inserting subsequent
amendments. However, please be advised that these proposed amendments only affect the City's
Comprehensive Plan Future land Use Map, and that no changes are proposed for any goal, objective, or
policy, or to Section VIII. land Use and Opportunities of the Future land Use Support Document. Once these
amendments are adopted, the City's Map will be amended and forwarded to you for your records.
The transmittal letters should provide you with all the necessary information; however, if you have questions or
are in need of additional information, please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
~v1-/~/ )-lJ ~~7~
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
T JH:mr
Enclosures
J:\SHRDA T AIPlaMing\SHARED\WP\SPECPROJ\COMP Pl..AN\Project Amendments\98-1.doc\9B-1 IIIIMD.doc
America's Gateway to the Gulfstream
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259
DEP ARTMENT OF DE\TELOPMENT
Division of Planning and Zoning
Bulent I. Kastarlak, NCARB
Director
Building
Planning & Zoning
Engineering
Occupational License
Community Redevelopment
February 23, 1998
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of State Planning
Plan Processing Section
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399
RE: Transmittal of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments - 98-1
Item #1-First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach (LUAR 97-002)
Item #2-Foster Property (LUAR 97-003)
Item #3-Woolbright Place PUD (LUAR 97-004)
To whom this may concern:
Enclosed you will find six (6) copies (individual copies have been simultaneously sent to the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council, the FOOT-District Four, the South Florida WMD, and the Department of
Environmental Protection) of the required transmittal documents for three (3), proposed Comprehensive Plan
amendments. Each of these Items consists of only an amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the
Comprehensive Plan. Descriptions of the proposed amendments are included below under General
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan, and are summarized as follows:
Item #1 would reclassify 14.18 acres from Moderate Density Residential to Local Retail Commercial,
which is to be removed from an existing Planned Unit Development to allow the development plans to
change from a church/school to a health care campus;
Item #2 would reclassify 23 acres of land to be annexed from Medium Residential 5 in Palm Beach
County to Low Density Residential to allow for the development of single family homes consistent with
the proposed land use designation shown on the Future Land Use Map; and
Item #3 is being processed in concert with Item #1 above, and would reclassify 66.16 acres of primarily
developed land from Moderate Density Residential to High Density Residential. This amendment is
necessary to offset the impact on maximum density caused by the removal of the 14.18-acre tract from
the original Planned Unit Development known as the Woolbright Place Planned Unit Development
(PUD).
As it has been determined that the proposed amendments described herein are consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, would not cause the adopted levels of service standards to be exceeded, and are
desirable by the Local Planning Agency and Governing Body, staff requests that these proposed
amendments not be reviewed. .
America's Gateway to the Gulfstream
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259
February 23, 1998
Proposed Amendments 98-1
Page 2
The City Commission, which acts as both the local planning agency and governing body, reviewed and
approved for transmittal, Items #1 and #3 on January 20, 1998, and Item #2 on January 6, 1998, both during
public hearings held subsequent to due public notice. With respect to adoption, staff anticipates that
ordinances will be adopted in Mayor June of the current year.
In accordance with the requirements of Rule 9J-11.006, please be informed that the subject amendments are
not in an area of critical state concern or the Wek:va River Protection Area, and are not related to a proposeC:
development of regional impact or to be adopted under a joint planning agreement.
Furthermore, it should be stated that the other reviewing agencies were provided with the City's entire
Comprehensive Plan and related support documentation on July 6, 1994, and informed that said documents
would be updated by subsequent amendments.
Should you have any questions on the subject amendments, please contact Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner at:
Planning and Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach, P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Tel: (561) 375-6260
Fax: (561) 375-6259
With respect to the remaining submittal requirements outlined in the amended Rule 9J-11.006, the following
has also been provided for your information;
(1)(b)(1) Six copies of two (2) maps indicating the proposed future land use map designations, property
boundaries and their relation to the surrounding street and thoroughfare network are included in
Attachment "A";
(1)(b)(1) The present land use designations of the subject and adjacent properties are shown on the maps in
Attachment "A";
(1 )(b)(2) Maps indicating existing land uses on the subject property and adjacent properties are included
within Exhibit "A";
(1 )(b)(3) Property sizes are shown on the respective maps within Attachment "A";
(1 )(b)(4) The availability of, and demand on public facilities is summarized below;
(1)(b)(5) Information regarding compatibility of the Map amendments with the Comprehensive
Plan, and other information relative to the basis of the recommendations is provided below;
(1)(c)Staff recommendations are as follows: Item #1 - Opposed; Item #2 -In favor; and Item
#3 - Opposed. The recommendations of the local planning agency/governing body are
indicated in the corresponding minutes (see Attachment "B"); and
(2) NA
February 23, ~ 998
Proposed Amendments 98-1
Page 3
To indicate the basis on which the Future Land Use Map is to be amended, the following information has been
provided whic:1 further justifies the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments with respect to compliance
with 5.163, F.S., Rules 9J-5 and 9J-11, F.A.C., and the City's Comprehensive Plan:
1. General consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
a. Item #1 represents property that is owned by a church organization who no longer desires to vacate
their existing property in the downtown to relocate their church and school to this alternative
site. In response to this decision, the church organization has determined that an appropriate
use for this site is a health care campus consisting of a nursing home, ACLF, and medical office
building. As the City does not allow office uses within this residential zoning district, they are
proposing that it be reclassified to commercial, consistent with the zoning and land use adjacent
to this property, Local Retail Commercial. This change is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan as the proposed project is compatible with adjacent land uses. The proposed use, an
ACLF, is described by the Comprehensive Plan as being one of the more innocuous types of
groups homes and therefore compatible within a residential environment (Future Land Use
Support Document, page 33). This proposed commercial use would be classified as having a
highly specialized nature which is one of the exceptions provided to the recommendation
against land use changes to commercial categories found within the Future Land Use Support
Document on page 40. Furthermore, the Housing Element Support Document, on page V-5,
promotes the approval of additional ACLF's provided the sizes and types are compatible with
other dwellings in the neighborhood. This proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses which
includes a restaurant, a shopping center, an apartment complex with 548 units, and several
single family homes which do not share a common roadway with this project. Also with respect
to location, it should be noted that this site is adjacent to the City's largest retirement-age
development, Leisureville, whose residents would be served by this project. Although this
proposal is to increase land classified as Local Retail Commercial, which is discouraged by
Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.17.1 and 1.19.6, the proposal qualifies for the exceptions listed
within these policies as access is greatest, impacts on residential land uses are least, and a
geographic need exists within the subject location.
b. Item #2 represents a reclassification consistent with the Future land Use Map designations for
areas to be annexed subsequent to adoption of the Comprehensive Plan (see current Future
land Use Map), and represents a slight decrease in impacts/maximum density as the existing
land use classification in Palm Beach County would allow 5 units per acre and the City's low
Density Residential classification allows a maximum of 4.84 units per acre.
c. Item #3 is proposed in connection with Item #1, which is required to offset the impact on density
caused by the removal of 14 acres from an existing Planned Unit Development. Furthermore,
this amendment will also resolve the density problem that resulted from the conflict generated
by the Tradewinds v City of Boynton Beach settlement agreement. This agreement required the
reclassification of the property to Moderate Density Residential land use, yet mandated
development to be approved on the property that exceeded the maximum density of 7.26 units
per acre. In reviewing this proposed amendment, staff realized that the maximum density of the
current land use classification is currently exceeded by 26 units. Intensifying this circumstance
is the proposed amendment to decrease the size of the Planned Unit Development by 14.18
acres (Item #1). This amendment would increase the discrepancy between the maximum
density and the existing density up to 128 units. By reclassifying the 66 acres of the PUD that
are currently classified as Moderate Density Residential to High Density Residential, the
_ February 23, 1998
Proposed Amendments 98-1
Page 4
maximum density of 10.8 units per acre exceeds the density of 10.41 units per acre remaining
after the 14 acres are extracted.
Due to the developed status of this property, no impacts will be generated from this amendment.
Excluding the 14 acres to be removed (Item #1), all property within the PUD that is to be
reclassified to High Density Residential is developed! Although the PUD contains 3.33 acres of
undeveloped property, this area is currently classified High Density. It should be noted that
development within this PUD has only occurred within the past three years. Although unlikely, if
the entire PUD were to be redeveloped, the reclassification would allow only an additional 76
units more than currently existing on the property, and would offset the loss of 14 acres of
residentially-classified land attributed to Item #1.
2. None of the three items involve property that contains environmentally sensitive or native features
worthy of consideration in the City's Comprehensive Plan or the County's inventory of native
ecosystems. Lastly, no site contains historic features recognized by the City or County;
3. With respect to the elimination or reduction of land uses inconsistent with the City's character and, the
need to increase or decrease the intensity of land uses, all amendments are considered to be
appropriate for their respective locations, clearly consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, or partially
unavoidable in connection with a court order;
4. All subject properties are located within the "B" or "C" flood zones, and with respect to availability of
drainage facilities, local drainage standards ensure that water quality is maximized, and offsite drainage
is minimized. Maintenance of the local level of service standard is ensured through the review and
permitting process of the local drainage districts.
5. With respect to Traffic Circulation Element analysis requirements, the only relevant policies in the Plan
that currently apply, which regard maintaining levels of service standards, will be complied with. All
impacted roadways have adequate capacity to absorb the additional traffic to be generated by the
proposed amendments without lowering adopted levels of service.
6. With respect to Housing Element analysis requirements, the applicable proposed amendments are
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Whereas Item #2 is consistent with the City's Comprehensive
Plan Future Land Use Map, the impacts from proposed amendments #1 and #3 would have offsetting
effects relative to the ultimate availability of land for housing.
7. With respect to Infrastructure Element analysis requirements, there is adequate capacity within the
City's utilities system to accommodate the increased needs to be generated by the proposed
amendments. It should be noted that Item #2 is consistent with the recommended land use
classification indicated by the Future Land Use Map for annexed properties, and therefore the
anticipated future demands from the development of this parcel were included within the original data
and analysis of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendments are consistent with all
Infrastructure Element objectives and policies;
8. The subject properties are not within the coastal management area;
9. The Conservation Element is not applicable;
- February 23, 1998
Proposed Amendments 98-1
Page 5
10. With respect to Recreation & Open Space Element analysis requirements, Item #2 is consistent with
the Future Land Use Map, and therefore, the ultimate demands to be generated by the proposed land
use have already been incorporated within the data and analysis of the Comprehensive Plan. As for
Items #1 and #2, the nearly offsetting impacts from th,~se two proposed amendments would result in a
slight decrease in land available for housing units. Consequently, the net impacts from these two
proposed amendments include a lowered demand for park acreage and recreation facilities within the
City;
11. The Intergovernmental Coordination Element analysis requirements have been satisfied as proper
notifications and requests for availability of facility analyses have been sent;
12. With respect to Capital Improvements Element analysis requirements, there are no impacts upon
capital facilities that have not been projected within the analysis of the Comprehensive Plan.
Therefore, levels of service are met and all other related policies are complied with; and
13. With respect to consistency with the State Comprehensive Plan and the Regional Comprehensive
Policy Plan, the above statements, along with the information provided within the staff report address all
pertinent issues and topics within the State and Regional Plans. Such issues and topics include
housing, natural systems, endangered species, levels of service, intergovernmental coordination, public
facilities, historic resources, and transportation.
If you have any questions concerning this amendment package, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
Very Truly Yours,
~~"~' J-~'-
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
T JH:mr
Enclosures
S:\PlanningISHAREDlWPISPECPROJ\COMP PLANIProject AmendmentsI98-1.docI9B-l DCALET.doc
ATTACHMENT "A"
MAPS
rmt\ t?~:::{:.()\;::?~?f~$:
\1
'I I
i
I I
IIII
; J t I
; I
"
I:
I
I
,--' ~/
..
. J
, , FEET
II [1/
'ttf!:j-,' ~
~=,
1.11'1 . ,"'-.
~J,- -J. ....; ~~"'>.:-
I Ii!
:-... ~--=~ ~.tii.po~.~xo-- ~.P"
,-~ 'I h'~~;P.p --c;r.N.f.'\ L-li . --
~ ~ ~ ~,,~
I I - :=~~
1-- ---
-ii>-
j -. ---\r;I ...'
~p-
- -r-:lC:
--....<"i-
.~~
=tJ S tAtf,
~ \1 ! llLtl Lri JeraLl1' / ,~
'-.I "-, sr~~ '^'r --
./: I ; ~.( :l \' I ,r
= ff 11 ~ l:i '.c. '"';~:= I.~L
""'V" '-.;.- I~I
, --' .~-- I~'
p---',: pi t:~ ".s'
,-1. .tw~,/\~.,.\..\..r~. . ;~ A -. .,,0; :", ~.:.:~i
..c ~ I .~. L~= +- !.."i .1:.;0. ..:?-"', '..
'-' ..'" -'-I"'~ ~" '. "., ~ ' I 7/... n.. :, ' .' JJ4i:; :Sl '::.
~, ' r- /.. ...:._..,..~:-:~;....:(_~_:.,.._.
:
~";;':" ~
,
/.
.i.. "t."
; ~~t;:!~iirJ \ ,- ~,,t'M ~<< <.
~I.B F1Jq-~}::'~~: :\~:/, 21'" f- J1UIi' ,:'rd';I."'"
.;..>.. ~y '1.F=J: .J -,\ _ I ~H: "" '. ." m II
,'6.-- "'r.,k'1<." " ",
J ',~llif HlI1J~. ., .r: II ,';, ~;;;; i?~41 ac. ,~; ., ;~4:< < ;
-'. 'TmniinllilUw: 2J:':!)~:;.. '~'~':l" - ~'n?F ,.' ~ ',.' , '.,
.Ir ~_ ..IJ. ....,.. . I!, ,,' . ,...', "..,,,'" <P'.' . . ,,:iI&" .;; - .;~:,..-'~~::
...J . . ..r. ..................~...........t.:....~
-.-- -~.__.-. --- -- r II .....". ~'I. : !....!,....................-.-..-. . . ~ ~
.'zo I, .Jll..f'.11 .., >>".,. ....,....-.. ~
~ ::.t~" II.tlU;_+. . -.o...k.:\ :.;,~/ !,' ;; ~H MODERATE DENSITY ~~
::: ~ : LOW DENSITY:\1 . i' . t ::~~f: RESIDENTIAL :::::
~T;T_ . '.:::: ::: ; RESIDENTIAL ~ .:. '.,. ~!ml:.: :: ;.;.:.:.:.:.:~:::::.
I..... ... -. ~ ___ . "._V' \;.;;. ~.~;~.. ~~~:.. ~i~'I:k .:::::::::;:::::::
J _~.:'.JA.'.. .AY ~ "'!OJ::- .. ~.:~ .................
. .- 1 I~.J '-y.:""~.lia:./I. . .-.......1 ~\ ~ ~~ . .................. .
"' r 1'<. J /.~LL"'!'C.If':~-: ~'~".. . . :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: '.:. ..
~~--I! i-'rL."~" ~~ 1~II~r ~l' ~ .... '. .. ~ ~ ': m.mmm~m~ ~ ::;.
/' [ I I I \. I : i I. . .:............... ~~ ....
. ~ ~\:3 I L : . :::::::::::::::::::::;::
'0 1/8 MILESV 3lJ :-_'_~--~"__"_-~)';"':~:;;:"..,...:.:,... ~. . ~m~HHHHHHHt~
'\" I' . -~r.~i2~.:~"~" ....,......,..,',:.~,....'.....~.~.~~~i.. . .....................+.
- ~- . ::.:.:.:.:~:.:.:.:.:.:.:
IIII I l ,r~'::,.-~- ;'~.... ~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::
. t :. -<.":: !-- :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
......"~.~,;;J. '. f: ::::::::::::::::::::::::
. ,{.;C~../~.: .".:::.;::'-:~.; ;.;-:. . ;. ........................
10 ,:U :'.:.' . :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;
400. 82~ ~~~r.T -- --; 01. 'ff I \' '. . :.:..:::::::::::::::::::=
VC-Yl. ~/~ _.~ ""/:"; .-:,:": ..,l';~ ,~:. .:~ : . ,e
...........-. L........~... -_...y. .. -.;:. · . 4.~~!.'!. " I
,- - (--;;~p;'~n:Fu IHfj~1 I(~;-:tr ~.:/',: ':i' ..,...... I:::::::"::-;,.H:....~::;:: ~. ". .. .n'" . . . :
H"itr'tLt,.;.(t rr 11, ~lU'-'V""'" ~~' ,:.".~~,.~..., . .:.:.:.:::O::.:.n:::::~:-:-I;e.:..:.:.:;:.:.:l~:
. . . ~.. ..J-ll;r:l-t1l1 ~:I-t~~" 1':'_1~~~- I :.... '..,. ........... .'. .' "_ l' ...... ....r " ,.".... ~~..' loC..'.'" _..... 'I .
rUTURE LAND USE
.l.b. ITEM #2.-J I
:--r-m- i . I I
.'
-
-I 14. j
"l .1' I ..'
IITT
I,'
T'
I
~
t~~~f#
'." .
'" . . '~.".~.'...=:--
y.-~._...,..~~.~. ~~
~~',"F.."'<. ....:: ~if~.;;:;: ..'~'
1~)~I' mH!t~i'i~~ l~~B
,~,;:,.~,...'.i;:*' ..... .~....;t;...:i' '. .."
~I ~~ :im~lli~ 11m
'.' .....t...I\~... .......
. .~ .,..!a!....'.,. .......
'4 :.tn.':'9:..J. :::.:
~ .~.:-~.'.i. . ,'.
ii' ....!....:...~.. .. ..
".' 1>......''='..-4
roo--
1----. --,
- ---'
t
, tu
~.,
~ ~. :~.
i'
~*1~1~f{
,,;.:::::.%"'::
;:r.t:~:~t
}~t
r,~l:~ '.
j ..:..;.~,J:-
- - i <<rr~~;.~ :~.~;:;::_ :;;"~ .;. '_ ;:.;;~::.:::.:: ~
r_nn
...
..... ~ ~. .;.,..
(*
:~.
.~<:
~-.
-
:,:;sN';.
... ,.."".
u ''''';
c= .
'.:1'~ .
..,.;....
. .~;~.
....:-:;..
.1)0:-.....
.....
.~:
u It:
" ,.'~
\iw'
-:;'.
... ~
,
.",..;:y
:::~r -:...
::...:1';:.
'.lK
".... [:7;
Ju:~ ~/.:
'-.
.~ it:: ~'" ;
; :v' n;~' dt:fi, ~'l..
,:" "I
0" '.. ~"ii.1<;;!Jt
C:::,.:
.. ;.
:11
~.
':: ...
._"~'"
.. $ ," :.-,::'~:t};':~',
':.:~~::::*:r:~:~~::~*'
;~;'~;~:;;.)j1;.: .<
:".[ ::: "l\".y.r ;"'. ,.
'. :...
:..: *: -:<(.-.
:~:~ ~ :;::::
.;......
'::\
;:".:'/;
~ %1?1
~%;~)i~;;il;:}.'~
.....
:;.:.'
:~
~~
~, r I.
,
;-
..... .... ~
~..jJ;
:::':::.
--:-~:, .:; ,;"'A~A L
................,
, I ~
-
II
In;
I: ~-_:t.~
.~R
....~~~.l_...~~...##..
_-4U.21Jl,<J,......AJ2.\1l.. -~~_. ~.
.------ -4 ~
J=8..'jl<"~-Q~;.;:~9U~B-E~~ L~ND U..SE, ~,~~~*~!. ~~"7~,;~"
J..;'.-.I.. ....., ...~ ~ -I. . r -~ ;:Ie . 1 --...;...; ~ t' ~ > I ~
l'3.~, 11'Tr1~ 1~~~""::-~8"~'.i-'" ~i~l:' :.~! ',:. '::'~::-::::t '-4~~Jji~~P<",;~~f,:
8 ~:'--.:.."..',i\..-'1.-...;' C,,,,, t..:..:1. ITEM #3.' \! I,. ...:.,.f-....l~- '........... ~.~t;.t:. 'u w.U-~
:..:;:r::' '_~ !', '1.:.{ ~. ~__'(:. f..~, --'.''''';~ .~..,.' .,:.. ~.~'.. I! 'I ',~" >-..~ .' ~- .. ,I~ t' "'" \.0.
.:,J-t. ./>H~ '. ;111l"": I', 1 .i~'" ~
:~: --:t : i. .7;-~~~\"~. .;.d'.... 11 '.:1. ~ il/l:ii:\~::!.;,:':..:=~ " rT~~I'H . ~ Z'\&
:J. '1 :V~.<:.t~'5~j . J'~~":: ~~". 1 ;;,:,jl:::\':IM~ti~~;~'l:.."J':'lj~r+~'T~]f ,..:-'~. . *~
;~ : ~'-. I"!.rf!ll'... ~__),~,.'2;.1t<'~ J '@r4'.......:!,.;;;;.rl.I..l.._,H............u......... . "--~
~J...r---r;"~ ~. ~~~".i ,vf: ;\~j'f~f.1: '>'::~t;:~~~":=.~r.: :::.~..
. I 1 .:::-- .-.;""" .-IF.<J ~j.~ ~:::ttl; ~)1 :'" ;\':t}r!l ,,"j" .-/ . "., -. . '.
.~ L.-J .'t'4';~':'::1:;:;;r-~!~'~ --~t;r~="J.. '. ... ~;2,~'.'; . ';~H .":~~lj
.. NN.....~ ,~~ :lft{~Ll~.~ II
.::::<.;._:,:.;~;; .". ~~Jt~ '~~'::,:::P]il il:t~:.j"~m~ 1\
o in-I. .: ~ ';'ii: ~.' ,: .':: :j'f~l<l .r ~lB~l.1\~ai.t<i'; _ i:
~.;>"~ r'1:fti:\'~; ,~l;W~~~; ~ \:1
:;:: ..' .., ,.' r. ~ :~ ' ';~ ~ i
.::;-::-:;TI". . '.. t- ,,' ~1~i'!14:';S."H'.;'1.r. ~ ,. " 'r-1 \
~~ . ;~ ~ j ""oIt.J rl "., f::..t'f,! ~,. ~
~:: ~,.'; .. ., . I . .... t:ll:: ,.._~.~- .....A-..e' '.. _f~'
. . ,. l>" ~ l ' .iHrn...,... . "'1 " I
~:r'1l. . " J ".\ 1 \ -::r:t. '_', w."..tJ" .,,' '., ,:,. ~l'~ II ~
(C"~-',.... ,,\.\.,. .#, . ,1:. .}._'" ~ ~1 __ ...,_
- ,.... ~ " \ ~'r-!-~""---'r-- ~ ! J I
. ..,j.. ~'" ' , :.".....:: . r---) mt II, 1;11.(1 . .HI I 11
.(:. ..' .' - .......r.ilillJ.. iff ~nt . If. .-, ~ ~(J;
Ji. ...../r.tt.I...-;~.l f'H ml.J . ;~Fl 1/\ 11
.::: :-:-~, : .. ."t;!.. m . - -r -:~ :=::' ~:'~'~':;?S'N'Gl.E" \ . \ \ I I
,~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'., ',~~?;g 'I' ITEM #3 I
~~~~. ~,~ , >(';~~ \ MULTj FAMILY t
~ "-<\c. '>i<:'''-.y)ti.~YACANT \ HESIDENTIAL I,'
.~~~,..\ .
~.., WJ~::)~~.'\ ~ ! I
>"~ ,,~~'\.=i\ \\ t J
'. . r .lr '..'iY ~~ ~'1':'"':':. . \ VACANT '! I
. ...~~ ,~:-~I~ ::~:.' \. L: ./
I .?,'~\- ::3:: \ \ I ,/
l~ .~l' ; 1E8f-e%' , ~~q"~_ ~.3.\. .~. .1.: Ij/j;! I',' \
::~'..j::': .-'
r ~ t. ,':.', ~ v-' . : :-:,' ; . , I !
. ~ ...\ ..... ,I I
'l~ \~l"\'" . ..i'~} :... .__~,~
1:3 -__~". ,[ '.-==---- ~
.-:. ,.' :-~~'t:;;;; . ~...._._-,- .-....
'r :.:;. .- --~ . ~
1m'r~} \,....-"'. -' .....-:-;, P" -. ._.,~ 'To' '\'t
., ~//~. %~,~~;~ ,: / r
....-
...............-
..
o,/tJ(Ji. 11.1i' 16 ...F
la
~-:-
...
r-
r' .
:.t~
~~,
ATTACHMENT "B"
LPNGOVERNING BODY RECOMMENDATIONS
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSI"'~
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
-
JANUARY 20,1998
VII. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:00 P.M. OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS THE AGENDA PERMITS
A.
Project:
Item #1 :
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach (LUAE 97-
002)
... T IL '..1' 1'1 .....1 J.L~L. rI r' .... '" I
Item #3: Woolbright Place PUD Land Use Amendment
(LUAE 97-004)
Agent: Unruh-Smith & Associates
Owner: First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach. Boynton Beach I Ltd.
Partnership, and Boynton Beach II Ltd. Partnership
Location: Woolbright Place PUD (east and west sides of SW Sit! Street, one-
quarter mile north of the intersection of SW Sit! Street and
Woolbright Road)
Description: Request to amend and rezone a 14.18 acre parcel within the
Woolbright Place PUD to change the existing approved use from a
church to a health care campus
(TABLED FROM CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF 1/6/98)
Motion
Commissioner Tillman moved to remove this item from the table. Commissioner Jaskiewicz
seconded the motion that carried 5-0.
Mayor Taylor reminded everyone that a great deal of input was received on this item at the last
meeting, and there has been some movement since that meeting. Tonighfs focus should be on
that new information. He urged everyone present not to reha~h old information, and suggested
that the supporters and opposers select a spokesperson.
Attorney Cheraf administered the oath to all who would testify during these proceedings.
All Commissioners divulged that representatives of both sides of this issue contacted them.
Ellen Smith. of Unruh. Smith & Associates. represented First Baptist Church. She advised
that a great deal of thought was given to the comments made at the last meeting. She
distributed copies of a letter to City Manager Willis dated January 20, 1998 listing compromises
on behalf of the applicant. Those compromises include:
13
1[0] rn @ fnl/' rn_
I ' "
.' " ~ 1
. :!
. MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSI<.
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 20, 1998
1. The proposed 67,500 medical office building will be reduced to 39,700 square
feet. This reduction is not required by the traffic circulation element of the City Comprehensive
Plan to maintain level of service "C" on SW 8th Street. Rather, it is proposed to reduce total
project traffic.
2. If requested by the City, a deed restriction will be recorded in the official land
records limiting the intensity of development on site to:
a. 34.300 square foot, 120-bed nursing home;
b. a 67,500 square foot, 60-bed ClF;
c. a 39,700 square foot medical office building; and
d. associated infrastructure and retention.
3. Prior to the occupancy of any building on-site, the owner of the property will
install traffic calming devices along the two-lane portion of SW Sltl Street, if requested, as
approved by the City Engineer.
4. The entrance to the medical office building shall be redesigned to only permit
egress to the right (toward Woolbright Road).
5. The City shall permit no other uses of the property other than those desaibed in
Item 2 above without City Commission approval.
Ms. Smith urged the Commissioners to approve this project that will make good use of these 14
acres.
Jose AGuila. 800 SW 1" Court. urged the Commissioners not to make a bad situation worse
by approving this project. It is his opinion that this request is based on financial gain. A multi-
family residential development is possible for this site, and would be profitable for the Church.
He also feels that if the City allows this development to exceed traffic counts, another developer
will demand more for his un built tracts. Mr. Aguila does not believe any traffic calming
alternatives are feasible because speed humps will divert the problem to SW 7th Street or
Leisureville Boulevard. The residents are concerned with traffic volume.
Bud Meadows. 200 SW 12111 Avenue. said the proposal brought forth this evening is not based
on the church developing the parcel. He requested that the Commission approve this
application since the Church wants to remain in the downtown. The Church needs to separate
from the PUO. The Church will be part of the drainage and Infrastructure, but they do not want
to build a worship center on that site, nor do they want to build a multi-family development.
They have an offer to do something else and they want to move forward. The Church does not
want to hurt the neighbors. and for that reason, they have made concessions recommended by
staff. He urged the Commissioners to approve the changes. .
Gary Brennan. attornev with Cartton-Flelds. represented the Church. .He has practiced land
use and zoning in Palm Beach County for 20 years. He has reviewed all of the agreements and
feels the Commission is well within its legal requirements to approve the request of the
applicant.
Commissioner Jaskiewicz thanked the applicants for the consideration given to her remarks at
the last meeting. She pointed out that whatever the Church does in the downtown is irrelevant
14
~ -~_.-.~
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 20,1998
to this discussion. In addition, the reference made by Mr. Aguila to Mr. Morton is also irrelevant
since he has made many alterations to his agreement. Commissioner Jaskiewicz said this
development will affel:t her personally since she is a resident of Leisureville. I'~ is her opinion
that this development will present the least impact. Parts of this development are almost a
passive use. She cannot imagine residential of any quality being developed across from The
Home Depot, Auto Discount Store or RaceTrac. She does not feel the residents would oenefit
by a residential development in this area. She is sympathetic with the traffic problem that needs
a solution, However, she feels this use is the least objectionable of all of the uses in this area.
She appreciated the applicant's effort to reduce the size of the project, and she believes it will
be an asset.
Mayor Taylor reminded everyone that the neighborhood to the north existed when the road was
closed. There was no traffic with the exception of local traffic. However, once the road was
opened, even without development, there would have been traffic generated by people traveling
from south to north. As commercial was added, traffic increased, and will continue to increase
as more development is added. Mayor Taylor said he visited the site to see what could be done
to solve the problem. Speed humps will slow the traffic in the area. In addition, he walked
behind The Home Depot and drove through the Vinings, and believes there is room in the back
for a road where truck traffic could be diverted. He recommended that staff investigate this
possibility. If this road could be built, truck traffic on SW SIh Street could be restricted. Mayor
Taylor does not have a problem with this use and believes there will be no traffic generation
from this use in the evening. While he understands the concerns of the residents to the north,
we will look at ways to make this use as safe as possible and try to find options to reduce the
traffic.
Commissioner Tillman feels a perimeter road might be one way to solve the traffic problem in
this area. His major concern with this project is that it came in as a shell. No construction plan
or construction timetable was induded. He would not want to see another project get to this
point unless it includes dates and timetables. Commissioner Tillman has no problem with this
project and recommends that the City look at the possibility of constructing a perimeter road.
Commissioner Bradley feels the improvements plan for the existing Church sound great
because it is a terrific use of the investment gains out of the property. However, he explained
that the Church paid approximately $180,000 for the land 10 years ago. It is estimated that if a
residential project was built, the profit would be approximately $1 million. If a commercial
project is built, the profit would double to $2 million or more. More is better because you can
build more. It is the Church's right to do that unless it negatively impacts ether people. That is
the problem with this development. There is too much traffic on SW Slh Street today. There are
still 150,000 square feet remaining to be develOped after this 14-acre parcel. The
recommendation for Moderate Density Residential that would have 105 or 110 units would not
exceed the 750 trips vested for that property. Commissio'ner Bradley will not support this
request.s
Vice Mayor Titcomb requested that the applicant explain the percentage of the increase of trips
that are generated with the reduction in usage of space of the 750 vested trips.
Attorney Cherof explained that the 750 was broken down. The Church school for 500 pupilS
was 510 trips and the 1,200 seat Church was 240 trips.
15
. MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 20, 1998
Mr. Aguiia said the roadway Mayor Taylor proposes will not work. Furthermore, he questioned
who would pay for the roadway if it could be built. In addition, speed humps will not work
because people will drive around them and leave tire, tread marks in the lawns of the residents.
He recommended the City purchase the nine homes along SW 8lh Street in order to make this a
collector road.
Mayor Taylor pointed out that the City is trying to work out a solution to the traffic problem, and
Mr. Aguila is only offering reasons why nothing will work.
Ms. Smith said the trips for the revised proposal equal 1 ,798. That is a 58% increase over what
is currently proposed on the property. The building envelope of the existing 750 trips is
inadequate for reasonable use of the land.
Vice Mayor Titcomb questioned where these trips would come from since they are an increase
over the vested number of trips on this project. In addition, he questioned whether this would
open the City to litigation or challenge for the other adjacent properties.
Attorney Cherof does not believe approval of this project will open the City to any litigation or
challenge. The trips can come from the total number that was vested for the site, or from a
recalculated figure to indicate a higher number of trips available. Today's testimony may
support a higher number.
Vice Mayor Titcomb inquired if this would open the door for other properties to petition the
Commission for additional trips. Attorney Cherof responded affinnatively.
Ms. Smith said that door is already open and any applicant can petition this Commission to add
trips to SW 8lh Street.
Commissioner Bradley asked for a legal opinion based on the fad that staff recommended
denial of this application because of inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan.
Attorney Cherof advised that the determination of consistency with the Comp Plan is a factual
determination made by the Commission based upon the testimony heard from the applicant and
staff. That testimony must be reevaluated independent of the Planning & Development Board's
opinions to determine whether or not the Commission feels it is consistent.
Carole Fretwell. 713 SW 31'11 Avenue. said the trips inaeased from 750 to 1,798. This is not an
increase of 58%. It is more than a 100% increase.
Jeff Smith. of Slmmons.WhIte Enalneers, explained that there are 1.798 trips of the site.
Seven hundred fifty trips are vested. Therefore, the new net trips to be addressed equal 1,048.
The new trips (1,048) over the total trips equal 1,798. The difference is 750 trips. When that
figure (750) is divided by the 1,798. the answer is a 58% increase.
Ms. Smith explained that the applicant has a project that meets the requirements of the
Comprehensive Plan with regard to the level of service "C.. The City does not have a traffic
engineer to accept the methodology used by the applicant The applicant is using the
methodology from City staff and standard methodology from Palm Beach County.
16
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 20, 1998
Vice Mayor Titcomb expressed concern about this project because it is a good project that is
pitting good people against good people. He feels this project is appropriate for this site. He
explained that if it is approved, he would like the City to designate SW 8th Street as a "No Thru
Truck" street as a way to decrease the traffic impact. He pointed out that the City could not
compel homeowners to sell their homes on SW 8th Street. While he is still not totally
comfortable with this project, h3 is impressed with the efforts made by the church and their
agents to listen to the conditions of the approval that might be considered. Speed humps and
closing the road to trucks and diverting traffic to the south will have an impact on lessening the
traffic to the north. Although the traffic on this road is bad now, it will get much worse based on
what is vested in this area. Vice Mayor Titcomb explained that in order for him to support this
application, the applicant would have to adhere to all conditions listed. This would include that
the City or applicant investigate the closure of the through-street to trucks entering the
commercial projects from Boynton Beach Boulevard, and that any other calming and traffic
devices deemed by the City and indicated will be implemented prior to anything going forward.
This would also indude the conditions that indude deed restrictions.
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director, advised that staff does not recommend that the
project entrance be limited to right-turn only. Staff investigated the dosing of SW 8th Street just
north of Crystal Key. Staff leamed that this would have a negative effect on the level of service
of the intersection of Woolbright Road and SW 8th Street that would put it under the adopted
level of service. Staff observed that the median opening across from The Home Depot and
Cracker Barrel is being used for .U. turns. If the egress of the driveway is restricted to right-tum
only, people will turn right and make a "U" turn further south.
Motion
~
;:/2;1'7 j
Commissioner Jaskiewicz moved to amend and rezone a 14.18 acre parcel within the
Woolbright Place PUD to change the existing approved use from a church to a health care
campus as per all staff comments and the additional Commission comments that were agreed
to in Items 1, 2, 3, and 5 submitted by Ms. Smith. In addition, Commissioner Jaskiewicz stated
that if the building permit or land development permit is not obtained within an 18-month period,
the zoning would revert back. Commissioner Tillman seconded the motion.
In response to Mayor Taylor, Commissioner Jaskiewicz agreed that her motion indudes having
staff look into limiting truck traffic on SW 8th Street.
The motion carried 4-1. (Commissioner Bradley dissented.)
MAYOR TAYLOR DECLARED A BRIEF RECESS. THE MEETING RESUMED AT 8:52 P.M.
.
Mayor Taylor pointed out that the last item was a three-part item. Therefore, two additional
motions are required.
M_LHn
~---;-.i.ll1f Jul1itu.. .w..!4~ __..,_11t ta n..n;cI .J'._d~, UIV ~I,_.~\ ,___I, f._..--*e
-............1 JJli:l1I III ~'lIIQVJ"," ftlUI IDIlS I~UC~~ Lv ,llllllif1} IfI.:II, .__...... ~""",L -I' .. FI"I.~.!. U._
~I....,,,...d ...1 not' d. ..:U, ... 1.......llI, ....... C '-'GIIIIo'U'" ..... PO'" .fi8itillill iR .... n~Rq~ '!ll......itio~1
17
~'.D
MEETING MINUTeS
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 20, 1998
4d1 ".. .:....:..... JlIT-j-tl -"1 g1-triAlI 1111111 ":1 if .Rill 8. 9IV-;--:lfll. 1111.11(1.. r w~",..J..
41... .. ....ll...." ll._t .tin. i 1 1. {8"" 1I111;....i......... 8Jiti~II"'1 J:.........l~)
~/J. Motion
,)
,,{ ~';? '" Commissioner Jaskiewicz moved to approve the land use amendment for Woolbrignt Place
,y PUD as per staff comments and all those included at this Commission meeting this evening.
Commissioner Tillman seconded the motion that carried 4-1. (Commissioner Bradley
dissented.)
: g
MEE71NG MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMIS~'- "
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIL..I'\
JANUARY 6,1998
VII.
PUBLIC HEARING:
/ A. Project: -)f:-Foster Property (ANNX 97-001 and LUAE 97-003)
Agent: Julian Bryan and Associates
Owner: Roland E. and Leila M. Foster
Location: North side of Miner Road, one-half mile west of Congress Avenue
Description: Request for annexation, the amendment of the Future Land Use
Map of the Comprehensive Plan from MR-5 in Palm Beach
County to Low Density Residential, and to rezone the property
from Agricultural Residential (AR) in Palm Beach County to
Planned Unit Development with a land use intensity of 4.0 (PUD
with LUI=4.0) to allow for 98 zero lot line, single-family homes
";/1
or-'
1''::: ,-<'
--f
./
Attorney Cherof administered the oath to all that would testify on this application.
9
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISS. 4
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 6, 1998
e
Mayor Taylor announced that the Planning & Development Board unanimously approved this
item.
Martin Perry represented the applicant. He thanked staff for their cooperation during this
process and advised that the applicant agrees with staff's comments. The plan is consistent
and compatible with the neighborhood. This application involves 98 zero-lot line lots.
The staff report discusses lot size. The average size of the lots is 6,000 square feet. However,
the applicant is unable to achieve a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet. All of the lots are at
least 5,000 square feet. One-third of the lots are in excess of 6,000 square feet. The applicant
is unable to create a housing type or style that is consistent with the goals of the City for more
upscale and larger homes. The applicant has agreed to the additional condition imposed by the
Planning & Development Board. The only unresolved item is the size of the street. This
subdivision will have one street. The applicant is requesting that this private'street be permitted
at 40' rather than 50'. Everything can fit within the 40' with the exception of one sidewalk that
will be an easement outside the 40'.
Julian Bryan. Plannina Consultant and Agent. 756 St. Albans Drive. Boca Raton. advised
that there is a mobile home park in unincorporated Palm Beach County to the west, and the
Meadows Subdivision on the east. Mr. Bryan said he was able to place a 20' landscape buffer
around the entire community that is separate and independent from the lots. In addition, there
will be two lakes on the east that will provide additional buffering.
One additional staff comment requested a secondary emergency access to the community. 0
That access was initially placed in the northwest comer. After consideration, staff felt it would
be more appropriate to create the emergency access at the northeast comer to allow a
pedestrian access to Meadows Boulevard. This will be incorporated into the plan.
Mr. Perry explained that there has been no discussion with respect to the park situation
because they have set aside a small area that does not meet all of the City requirements. The
applicant's intention is to utilize the Code provisions to make a contribution for whatever they do
not have. In addition, tt)e applicant is providing the pedestrian access to the public park north of
the Meadows.
He reiterated that the applicant is in agreement with 'all conditions. The only issue subject to
debate is the 40' street versus the 50' street. The project is not feasible without 40' streets
because the lot sizes will be dramatically altered. There is a provision in the Code that allows
the Commission to vary the street width without the applicant having to request a variance.
In response to Commissioner Tillman, Mr. Perry advised that there is a 20' landscape buffer
along the west property line adjacent to the mobile homes. In addition, there are the typical rear
yard setbacks that average approximately 15'. There will be large shade and canopy trees in
the buffer planted on 30' centers along the perimeter as well as a Ficus hedge that will grow to a
height of 6' or 7'.
Commissioner Bradley asked Mr. Perry to explain why the applicant cannot make the average
lot size larger than 6,000 square feet.
o
10
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSIl
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 6,1998
o Mr. Perry explained that, for economic reasons, the project would not be feasible if the lots are
all 6,000. If the applicant constructs a 50' width street and maintains 6,000 square foot lots, he
would lose 25% of the lots. Land acquisition prices will not allow this project to be feasible. The
applicant would look for another vacant parcel. Mr. Perry explained that the applicant is trying
to maintain a certain size and type of house to try to meet the desires of the City with respect to
upgrading housing stock. To increase lot sizes and street width, the number of lots must be
reduced. Therefore, a higher priced house must be built to make up the economic loss. This
could put the developer out of the market because it does not make sense to build that high-
priced housing project in the neighborhood. The applicant has met all of the City's
requirements. Many of those requirements are in excess of what the County would require.
The only things the applicant cannot do is provide a 50' width street and 6,000 square foot
minimum lot size. Twenty-seven of the 98 lots exceed the minimum requirement, 35 lots are at
5,000 square feet, and the remaining lots are between 5,000 and 6,000 square feet. The
applicant has made a good effort to accommodate all of the City's requirements.
In response to Commissioner Bradley, Ms. Heyden explained that the LUI at the Meadows is
probably six, and there are nine different pods in that subdivision. The lots in the smaller single-
family pods are 5,000 square feet. The lots in the last pod that was built are approximately
6,000 to 7,000 square feet. However, the average lot size in the Meadows is 5,500 square feet.
Commissioner Bradley feels that if the Commission is adamant in requiring the minimum lot
size, the City will have better housing stock.
o
Mayor Taylor agreed with Commissioner Bradley's remarks and pointed out that one of the
goals of this Commission was to upgrade housing stock in this community. He is not happy with
crammed in homes with no sidewalks on narrow streets.
Ms. Heyden explained that this applicant was faced with the decision of whether to go through
the County process or come to the City. This property is in our Reserve Annexation Area. Even
if we enter into a Water Service Agreement with the applicant, he would have to come to us at
some point. Water service and annexation are done simultaneously. We wanted the applicant
to come through our process so that once the property is annexed, it meets our standards. To
entice the applicant to come to the City, we developed a proposal for the applicant to get
through our process in an expeditious manner. As part of that proposal, much negotiation took
place. The original plan was for 4,500 square foot lots. This parcel of land is very small
compared to other parcels within the Meadows. Staff was able to persuade the applicant to
increase the lot sizes to not less than 5,000 square feet. The applicant has made an effort to
comply with our housing goals while still maintaining a marketable project.
Ms. Heyden reminded the Commissioners that we now require all local streets to have
sidewalks on both sides. The applicant can meet all design requirements within a 40' right-of-
way. The only remaining issue is whether or not the variance process can be part of these
proceedings.
e
Mr. Perry advised that there were no letters of objection written from the surrounding
neighborhood. The applicant has made a significant effort and wants to meet all regulations to
the best of his ability. Although the applicant does not meet the minimal 6,000 square feet on all
lots, he averages 6,000 square feet. The land use intensity is less than any other development
in the surrounding area. Mr. Perry urged the Commission to grant approval of this petition.
11
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSh. .
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 6,1998
.
Commissioner Bradley said he appreciates the applicant's efforts to comply. However, he has a
problem with the 40' street width.
Mr. Perry explained that the pavement meets all of the City's requirements. The applicant is
able to fit one sidewalk and will construct the other sidewalk by way of an easement. He
reminded the Commissioners that this street would be a private street.
Commissioner Bradley feels this is too much of a project on a small site.
Mr. Perry said the applicant could have gone to the County and gotten approval for 4,500
square foot lots with a 40' roadway and bulkheads instead of the cul-de-sacs. He feels the
applicant has made a real effort to work with the City.
Commissioner Jaskiewicz said she appreciates the efforts that were made, and she realizes
that if this project went through the County process and we annex this property at a later date,
we will have to deal with smaller lots than are currently being proposed. She concurs with staff
that the applicant made a sincere effort, and she is in favor of this project.
Commissioner Tillman expressed concern about the width of the roadway with respect to
emergency vehicles, and questioned whether the applicant could improve the buffer.
Mr. Perry said the proposed landscaping is in excess of City requirements. Mr. Bryan advised
that since the Ficus hedge is 20' wide, nothing would be accomplished by constructing a beml.
The applicant proposes a Ficus hedge at grade. In addition, there will be trees not less than 30' 0
on centers. There are clusters of trees and Palms in addition to the trees on 30' centers. One
reason a decision was made not to do a berm was that there is a technical problem associated
with berms related to rear yard drainage. In addition, there is not enough space available to
include a 5' or 6' berm. However, the applicant can put in a 2' or 3' berm.
Vice Mayor Titcomb concurred with Commissioner Bradley's feelings about house size and
street size. However, he appreciated the efforts made by the applicant to meet our Code
requirements, and realizes the benefit of annexation of the property at this time. He will support
this project.
Bulent Kastarlak, Director of Development, said that in considering this subdivision, it is
important to think about the final product. This plan has 2,600 square foot houses on each lot.
Even if a one-car garage were removed, a 2,000 square foot house would remain. Therefore,
there was no flexibility to design this project differently. He commended the designer of this
project. The size of the lots is compatible and he is comfortable with the project. He
recommends approval of this project.
Ms. Heyden advised that this applicant is the first applicant in three years who has not included
the buffer as part of the lot size. If this applicant did that, it would raise the lot size by 1,000
square feet.
Although Mayor Taylor still desires better housing stock for the City, based on the comments
made by Planning & Zoning, and the applicant's efforts to work with the City, he will support this
p~~ 0
12
o
MEETING MINUTES
. REGULAR CITY COMMISSIC.
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 6,1998
Motion
Commissioner Jaskiewicz moved to approve the request for annexation, the amendment of the
Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan from MR-5 in Palm Beach County to Low
Density Residential, and to rezone the property from Agricultural Residential (AR) in Palm
Beach County to Planned Unit uevelopment with 3 land use intensity of 4.0 (PUD with LUI;.:4.0)
to allow for 98 zero lot line, single-family homes, subject to staff comments. Commissioner
Tillman seconded the motion that carried 5-0.
, ~
1-.5
1-20-i998 5:00PM
FROM UNRU~ SM:TH ASSOC 407 655 5525
P.2
~/--.~
-
.....-- ~ - --
IIIIII! IJ\Kur'.s,'.lIH~A)\OLl~llS
· Public P~)lic.y ;Jl!d S~r<llcbic Pbn;~!I1S
. bll1d lbt, and Zonins ~1attcs
· I.egislat w Re~ul;Jll.'ry Action
· (;ovcrnn1l;l1[ Rl'lalion,
· Privaflzation b~lI(':>
VIA TELECOPY TO EXPEDITE
January 20. 1998
Ms. Kerry Willis, City Manager
City of Boynton Be;wh
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach. FL 33425
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach: LUAR 97-002: Medical Care Campus-
Woolbript Road and SW 8/A Street
Dear Ms. Willis,
RE:
I have been asked by City statTto list those items the First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach has
proposed in order to address items raised at the January 6, 1998 hearing on the referenced request.
The items proposed are in addition to tbe draft conditions of approval in the City's staff report.
On behalf of the First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach, this letter proposes that the following
items be made part of the conditions of approval for the referenced project:
1. The proposed 67.500 medical office building will be reduced to 39,700 square feet. This
reduction is not required b~ the traffic circulation element of the City Comprehensive Plan to
maintain level of service "C" on SW glh Street. Rather, it is proposed to reduce total project
traffic ,
2. (f requested by thc City, a deed restriction will be recorded in the official land. records
limiting the intensity of development on site to: a) 34,300 sq. ft., 120 bed nursing home; b) a
67.500 sq. ft., 60 bed CLF; e) a 39,700 square foot medical offic~ building W!d; d) associated
infrastructure and retention,
3. Prior to the occupancy of my building on-site, the owner of the property will install traffic
calming devices along the two lane portion of SW 8th street, if requested, as approved by the
City Engineer.
4. The entrance to the medical office building shall be redesigned to only permit egress to the
right (toward Woolbright Road).
5. The City shall pcnnit no other uses of the property other than those described in item 2 above
without City Commission approval.
Although the proposed medical care campus bas been designed to minimize adverse impacts and
assure compatibility and provide a n~ed service, these item are offered in the spirit of
compromIse,
v cry truly yours,
105 South N;l,.ci'~lJ' AVt'lhlt. · $lIitc.' 50'> · West P;lllll 81:.1(;11, Horida .>HOI . S61-83S-8S0S · hie )61 6SS 5525
JAN-19-199S 14:35
Departmeltt of Elt,iateerift,
~d Public Works
PO. Box 212;!Q
West P.llm !cach, FL 3~4l6. 12:ii<:)
(!:iol) 684.4OCO
hltpJ,wwwco palrr.-bcaCh.n.uS
.
Palm B~h CO\fnt)l
8o.rd of County
Commissioners
~Urt Aaron~cn, Chairrr.an
Ma!Jd~ Ford lee, Vice Chair
Karen T. :vJarccls
c.1I0! A. RlJb~rlS
Wam:.' H. Newel!
Mny McCarty
Ken L Fo~:cr
COUlIty A.dministrator
Rc~ert WelSm.1l1, P E.
. An Equal Oppor:-~ 'lily
"/Iirmnnvc Acri"" F.mp!oyn-"
@ pri"'Cd CO" "'eye/ad papa'
ill
PBC TRAFFIC ENG
561 478 57~0 P.01/03
JVf20mJ
~ ~ W ~
PlANNING AND
ONING DEPT
TRAFFIC DIVJSIQN
FAX NUMBER: (56!) 478-5770
.....................***..*.....................................
TRANSMITTAL DATE: 'II c; Ie;"
PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING TELECOPIED MATERIAL TO:
......*........................*.....*..........................
RECEIVER' S NAME: ,... A ""--10 1\ I
OFFICE NAME: 13 oy~To'^""
,..,. E ~ t)f:.N
pl.,At ..,..,..-1 ;4"c.
OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER: (
OFFICE FAX NUMBER: (
SUBJECT: \J"'-J ,el\ ~ E;:'( rl"",-,
~'V'-> Lv?, f'\ l ~ 1+-1
)
) ~"tl S- - 62S'Cj
A.A.~'L ~ ~ t.f
5k ~
d
.................................................................
SENDER'S NAME:
o~~
Lv'e- t.j PJC-A. f.
) be\(' _ \{'{J?cJ
OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER: (
.....*...........................................................
TOT AI.. NUMBER OF PAGES (including this transminal cover sheet): 3 .
YES U NO (.t~.
PLEASE CALL TO VERIFY RECEIPT OF MA~:
NAME OF FAX OPERATOR: C.
JAN-19-1998 14:36 PBC T~HFFIC ENG 551 478 5770 p.b..
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
CLOSING SW. 8TH STREET
RESIDNETIA1. TURNING MOVEMENTS
PeaK
FROM TO 4.00 4.15 4.30 4.45 5.00 5.15 5.30 5.45 Total DiVerted Hour Note
North South 21 19 30 32 32 33 27 24 218 121 [1 ]
North East 2 1 5 2 0 3 2 5 20 1" [2J
North West 8 7 11 5 4 11 12 16 74 4' [3]
South North 40 40 42 47 60 54 36 27 346 192 [4]
South East 9 13 3 9 13 8 10 13 78 78 43 [5]
South West 5 11 13 12 15 15 11 16 98 98 54 [6]
West North 5 10 10 10 12 14 9 11 81 45 (7)
West South 12 8 11 6 19 8 6 4 74 74 41 [8]
West East 10 a 8 6 7 15 7 9 70 39 19]
East North 4 5 3 1 7 0 0 2 22 12 110]
East Scuth 0 4 5 4 6 6 6 3 34 34 19 !11 J
East West 3 2 2 4 8 6 2 6 33 18 {12J
Total 119 128 143 138 183 173 128 136 1148 264
Peak Hour 143 138 183 173 637
Peak Hour Percent 55%
COMMERCIAL TURNING MOVEMENTS
Peak
FROM TO 4.0J 4.15 4.30 4.45 5,00 5.15 5.30 5.45 Total Diverted Hour
Home Depot North 20 25 7 16 13 15 14 12 122 122 64 [13]
Home Depot South 55 51 44 34 43 30 30 27 314 164 [1.4J
Auto Discount North 2 5 1 2 3 3 2 1 19 19 10 [15]
Burger King North 13 20 7 11 9 17 8 12 97 97 51 [16}
Craker Barrel North 3 1 C 0 0 1 0 4 9 9 5 [17J
Craker Barrel South 0 6 5 7 7 8 6 7 46 24 (18)
Racetrack South 9 12 4 11 6 1 3 9 55 29 [19J
Auto Disc.! B, K, South 40 30 30 17 42 31 33 35 258 135 (20)
North South 20 33 41 43 33 32 32 33 267 139 [21]
North Home Depot 19 20 15 22 17 17 6 6 122 122 64 [22]
South Home Depot 3 3 20 11 11 5 16 10 79 41 (23]
South Auto Discou nt 1 2 7 2 3 3 2 1 21 11 (24]
North Burger King 2 3 2 2 2 2 0 0 13 13 7 (25)
South Burger King 18 39 41 50 48 37 39 53 325 170 (26]
North Craker Barrel 2 2 1 0 4 4 3 2 18 18 9 [27]
South Craker Barrel 2 2 1 8 8 13 6 8 48 25 (28]
North Racetrack 9 8 7 7 7 2 5 3 48 48 25 [29J
South Ncrth 33 34 51 43 58 54 55 70 398 208 [30]
Total 251 296 284 286 314 275 260 293 2259
Peak Hour 296 284 286 314 1180
Peak Hour Percent 52%
TOTAL P.03
JRN-19-1998 14:35
PBC T~AFFIC ENG
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
CLOSING S,W 8TH STREET
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS
WOOLBRIGH ROAD AT S.W. 8TH STREET
Direction
From
North
North
North
East
East
East
South
South
South
West
West
West
Total
Turning Entering Percent
Movement 11-06-96 S.W.8th Entering
Ight 158
Thru 8
Left 214
Right 258 258 50%
Thru 888
Left 29
Right 143
Thru 38 38 7%
Left 64
Right 18
Thru 928
Left 219 219 43%
515
Notes
[31J Entering = [24] + 50%[26J
Exiting = [18J + [20]
[32J Multi-family
i
\
;:
I
J l-~
1002 i 1283 ~
/~-
'~" /'"
"
'.
.....,.
'''--.
181
159
Entering
Exiting
Enterir:g
Exiting
[33] Entering = (8] +(11) + [22] + [251 + [27J + [29]
Exiting = (5) + [6) + [13] + (15) + [16];. [17]
566 d,u.
Single-family
Critical Sum
85 duo
852
~
"'~~,.
".
'.
-.
".
T A/'1 ~ 1\ \
\"" Ttf A..~~ '<- r'l4.JW
CAP ,4-..(. (. 1"" \"{
---
....
551 478 5770 ~.02/03
Exiting
$. W. 8th
158
8
214
~.\,.,~1jJ),~1 ,it; v.:.c~ ii . ?~ .
, .,.,' AV e.A ~..tP
Percent ~dd 199'1' Add 100~o d [33] ur#!
Exitir,g vel. [31] ~es. 32] iversion .
42% i 224 284 378
2% : 11 '- 14 19
56% ; 303 I 385 512
I 349 !, 498 577
888 . 688 888
29 29 29
143 143, 143
51 73 i~ 85
64 64 I;. 64
18 18 \ 18
928 928 j 928
296 423 f 490
380
242
114
56
30
158
227
1400
t-.L1. ~ v
\H-
Friends, neighbors, and other interested parties, though
I cannot be here in person, I can in spirit, word, and deed.
The spirit o~ our neighborhood is at stake. Our neighborhood
is on the verge of becoming a narrow gateway community between
Hver growing commercial zones. We are being pinched. Further
development leads to higher traffic, and higher traffic leads
to road widening. Creating four lanes on SW 8th would put the
easternmost lane close enough to grab a for sale sign next to
the mahogany trees just in front of my house. Eventually, we
will be squeezed out.
When there is no more undeveloped land left for commercial
investments and the neighborhood has been squeezed, many,
uncomfortable now with these recent developments, will sell
their homes. The homes will not sell for what they would've
ten years ago. As the commercial centers progress, the
neighborhood regresses; the old spirit dies as long-time
residents flee in search of more residential areas. However,
tonight, the spirit of our neighborhood is alive.
Word is that a Baptist Church owns land north of the Cracker
Barrel. Word is that the Church wants to sell this land. Word
is that the Church wants to sell the land to a commerical
enterprise_ If this is allowed to happen, the traffic count
will go up on SW 8th, and the squeezing will begin_ A church
would not create significant traffic increase, but word is the
Church wants to sell the property for use as a medical campus,
which would create significant traffic increase. The Planning
and Zoning staff does not support this change. Nobody in our
neighborhood supports this change.
What must be done in order to save this neighborhood is
to allow the Church to sell, but to a residential developer.
Look at the growth of the Vinings and Crystal Key. Just don't
allow the land north of Cracker Barrel to become commerical_
The City Planning Department can confirm that traffic counts
would not be significantly affected to the point of necessitating
road widening if, say, 100 units were constructed on this land.
To tho~e with the power to stop the pi~hing and squeezing of
our ne~ghborhood, I implore you to do the right thing.
Thank you for allowing my, words to be heard at the meeting.
I can only hope that my feelim~s were felt as well_
Respectfully,
, homeowner at
ct.
Jef
745
00
IE @ U WI IE ,m
JAN ~ i~
i
!
PLANNING Arm fl'
ZONING DEPT.
~
-
li li li li UNRUH, SMITH & ASSOCIATES
· Public Poli(} and Strategic Planning
· Land Use and Zoning l\'latters
· Legislative Regulatory Action
· Government Relations
· Privatization Is~ues
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mike Rumpf
Chris KerrC'I(
FM:
DT:
January 5, 1998
RE: Improvements to the First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach Master Plan
ourfile1370 1058,ckl
Per our conversation this morning, I have attached an amended copy of the First Baptist
Church Master Plan depicting a number of the recommended conditions of approval. The
recommended conditions included in this plan include #1,4,5,8, and 12.
Please note that the satisfaction of condition #12 (relocating the C.L.F. building) is
advantageous because it will increase the setback between the nearest Leisureville homes
and our C.L.F. building. This is naturally preferable to the Leisureville residents.
If this revised plan cannot be considered in time for the Commission meeting, we would
recommend adding the repositioning of this building, as shown, to the conditions of
approval.
attachments
105 South Narcissus /\venue · Suite 503 · West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 · 561-835-8505 · Fax: 561-655-5525
SIMMONS & WHITE, INC.
Engineers. Planners · Consultants
January 5, 1998
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Attention:
Mr. Michael Rumpf
Senior Planner
Re:
Woolbright Place P.U.D. Revision
City of Boynton Beach, Florida
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The purpose of this letter is to respond to the Staff Report
comments regarding traffic for the above referenced project,
specifically the evaluation of S.W. 8th Street.
The first step in the evaluation of this roadway is to determine
the roadway capacity. The Palm Beach County Unified Land
Development Code Traffic Performance Standard establishes the
capacity of two lane roadways based on Level of Service liD" and the
Florida Department of Transportation Generalized Annual Average
Daily Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas Class Ib (2.5 to 4.5
signalized intersections per mile). The following summary for 2-
lane and 4-lane roadways applies:
Class Ib (2.5 to 4.5 siqnalized intersections per mile)
Level of Service liD II
Lanes
Capacity
2-lane
4-lane
14,300
31,100
It is my understanding that Staff has determined that a more
stringent Level of Service "C" Standard applies to S. W. 8th Street.
The Level of Service "C" capacity will vary based on the number of
signalized intersections per mile. The following summary of the
Florida Department of Transportation Tables for Level of Service
"C" applies:
4623 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite 112. West Palm Beach. Florida 33415
Telephone (561) 965-9144' Fax (561) 965-0926
Mr. Michael Rumpf
January 5, 1998 - Page Two
Level of Service IICII
Lanes
Class Ia
(0-2.49 signalized
Intersections per mile)
Class Ib
(2.5 to 4.5 signalized
Intersections per mile)
2-lane
4-lane
15,200
33,300
8800
19,200
The link of S.W. 8th Street from Woolbright Road to Boynton Beach
Blvd. is one mile in length and signalized at each end. The
terminal signals at the link's end each equate to one-half of a
signal for the purposes of utilizing the Florida Department of
Transportation Tables. This one mile long link therefore has one
signalized intersection per mile and Florida Department of
Transportation Table Ia should apply with a Level of Service IICII
capacity of 15,200 vpd.
In-field 24-hour traffic counts were performed by Palm Beach County
Engineering Traffic Division on S.W. 8th Street on the 2-lane
section south of West Ocean Drive and the 4-lane divided section
north of Woolbright Road. The counts were performed on December
12th and 16th, respectively, and should be factored to reflect an
average annual volume. The Florida Department of Transportation
1996 Peak Season Factor Category Report is attached with this
letter. A seasonal adjustment of approximately 96% and 95%,
respectively, was applied to the two counts to obtain average
annual counts:
Count Count Volume Adjustment A.A.D.T.
Location Date Factor
South of Ocean 12/12/97 6374 vpd 95.7% 6102 vpd
North of
Woolbright 12/16/97 6697 vpd 94.7% 6344 vpd
Adding the project traffic and anticipated traffic from the
approved but unbuilt portions of the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD (as
calculated in the Staff Report) to the above AADT volume south of
Ocean, the 2-lane portion of S.W. 8th Street is anticipated to
operate within Level of Service IICII capacity for both Class Ia and
Class Ib of the Florida Department of Transportation Tables:
=
6102
800
1874
TOTAL 8766
15,200
8800
AADT Volume south of Ocean
Project Traffic
Shoppes of Woolbright PCD
=
=
Class Ia L.O.S. "CII
Class Ib L.O.S. "C"
Mr. Michael Rumpf
January 5, 1998 - Page Three
The stop signs on S.W. 8th Street at Ocean Avenue and S.W. 1st
Court are not considered signalized intersections under the Florida
Department of Transportation Generalized Tables. Under the most
conservative methodology of considering the stop signs as
signalized intersections, however, the Class Ib Level of Service
IIC" Standard of 8800 vpd would apply and the project would still
meet the City's Standard.
In summary, the proposed project's net impact on S.W. 8th Street
has been estimated at 800 trips per day. With the addition of
project traffic, this link is anticipated to operate well within
the City's Level of Service Standard. This project therefore meets
the City and County Standards with regard to traffic performance.
If you require any additional information to revise your Staff
Report favorably, please call me directly. I am available to
respond immediately to your concerns. Thank you very much for your
help with this matter.
Sincerely,
INC.
RFR/jp
rumpf
96-87
Enclosures
cc: Mrs. Ellen Smith
PBC TRRFFIC ENG
VOLUME REPORT
Volu. ..: Report with 24 Hour Tot.aJ. Page 1
*******************************************************************************
Data File D1211001.PRN
station 000000000001
Identification 000000000013 Interval
Start date Dee 11, 97 Start time
Stop date Dee 12. 97 Stop time
City/Town CAR County
Location swaTH 5T 400' S OF OCEAN AVE (BB)
******************************************************************************~
Dec li/Dee 12 Northbound Volume for Lane 1
Vc'~-3U-1937
14:53
561 478 5770
P.03/03
15 minutes
11:15
11:15
P.6. COUNTY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
-------- ----
15 11 5 4 1 3 2 5 16 43 50 52 6C
30 7 4 4 1 0 1 14 33 56 47 50 3E
45 13 5 4 2 2 9 16 36 49 39 55 5::
00 13 :2 3 1 6 4 27 47 64 67 53 6:
--------
Hr Total 44 16 15 5 11 16 62 132 212 203 210 214
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2:;
--------
15 58 53 60 58 86 92 50 43 21 26 34 2/
30 55 56 54 70 79 70 59 37 34 25 47 1E
45 58 56 66 75 78 92 40 41 37 26 17 H
00 40 69 57 99 75 60 31 34 28 32 13 H
--------
Hr Total 211 234 237 302 318 314 180 155 120 109 111 7";
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24 Hour Total 3508
AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume : 229 Peak hour factor : 0.9]
PM peak hour begins : 15:45 PM peak volume : 342 Peak hour factor : o .8~
******************************************************************************~
Dee 1t/Dee 12 Southbound volume for Lane 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 1]
--------
15 8 :2 4 1 0 4 12 44 64 48 37 3:
30 5 0 1 1 1 3 12 52 62 39 31 3:
45 4 2 1 1 4 4 39 59 57 42 40 5E
00 3 1 0 0 4 5 40 84 51 54 48 4:
--------
Hr Total 20 5 6 3 9 16 103 239 234 163 156 161
------------------------------------------------------------------------------~
End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2:
--------
15 59 36 63 43 65. 54 52 38 28 21 19 1-
30 39 36 51 50 45 46 42 3S 22 19 13
45 52 49 56 42 56 44 38 21 23 16 14 1(
00 43 38 56 57 50 54 36 30 17 16 3 f
--------
Hr Total 193 159 226 192 216 198 168 124 90 72 49 4:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24 Hour Total 2866
AM peak hour begins: 07:30 AM peak volume: 269 Peak hour factor: 0.81
PM peak hour begins: 14:00 PM peak volume: 226 Peak hour factor: 0.91
******************************************************************************.
637tf
':, ~ 7i./ ./
~2i?3_) =
... " # 16 /
/ I /"1'/
rv /'-
If, D, --r:
TOTRL P.03
DEC-30-1997 14:53
PBC TRRFF I C EI'~G
561 478 5770 P.02/03
~TT 4:.~.&-oJ
PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
VOLUME REPORT
Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page
*****************************************************************************:
Data File D1215001.PRN
Station 000000000002
Identification 000000000013 Interval
Start date Dec 15, 97 Start time
Stop date Dee 16. 97 Stop time
City/Town CAR County
Location sw eTH ST 500' N OF WOOLBRIGHT RO
*****************************************************************************;
Dec IS/Dee 16 Northbound Volume for Lane 1
15 nlinutes
11:15
11:15
P.B. COUNTY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
--------
15 7 3 5 1 2 1 3 19 29 36 40
30 7 2 3 0 2 1 4 16 33 39 54 ~
45 1 1 2 0 1 1 11 28 33 45 39
00 5 3 2 0 1 3 11 29 45 44 51 f
--------
Hr Total 20 9 12 1 6 0 2'~ 92 140 164 184 2:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 -
~
--------
15 70 67 71 77 79 97 84 51 44 40 15 ,
c
30 61 64 69 64 79 79 85 40 32 28 16
45 74 (;,9 79 69 76 93 64 44 28 1.5 17
00 70 71 56 69 76 92 70 37 32 15 24
--------
Hr Total 275 271 275 27CJ 310 361 303 172 136 98 72
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24 Hour Total 3514
AM peak hour begins : 11:15 AM peak volume : 250 !=leak hour factor : O. E
PM peak hour begins : 17:00 PM peak volume : 361 Peak hour factor : o . (
*****************************************************************************~
Dee is/Dee 16 Southbound Volume for Lane 2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
--------
15 3 3 8 3 3 2 21 54 91 54 41
30 5 5 1 2 3 5 15 69 71 43 40
45 3 2 2 0 0 10 34 75 51 57 47
00 2 3 4 1 5 14 43 113 75 46 52
--------
Hr Total 13 13 15 6 11 31 113 311 288 200 180 1.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
--.....-----
15 35 60 47 57 58 45 57 17 22 20 26
30 56 59 56 47 50 29 42 32 21 26 21
45 43 75 47 74 46 46 37 29 20 15 14
00 68 55 63 56 50 47 34 18 25 29 14
--------
Hr Total 202 249 213 234 204 167 170 96 88 90 75
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
24 Hou~ Total : 3183
AM peak hour begins: 07:30 AM peak volume: 350 Peak hour factor : O.
PM peak hour begins : 12:45 PM peak volume: 262 Peak hour ~actor : 0 I
*******************~**************~**~*******************************~*******:
, .' -') r-!
') 'oJ '.i .'
/ . 1'7
(::.,'" "; I
-' ,
/ ~ 'I
. " .' .,.f)~'~":;; .
: .- ./:.;.... . ~- /
, -.'5 ./
/ r;~i.f /)l) I
J _. n.. -::
u
526 P01
Categoryl 51301
1996 peak Season Factor Category aeport
PALM BEACH CBNTRAL
62", 40 x- S'5
W.ek Date. SF PSCF
.....=...........~..=.=............~..................a..............ec.......s.
. 1 01/01/96 - 01/06/96 D.9S 1.00
. 2 01/07/96 - 01/1J/5I6 0.97 1.02
*) 01/14/96 - 01/20/96 0.98 1.03
. t 01/21/96 - 01/27/96 0,97 1.02
. 5 01/28/96 - 0~/03/96 0.96 1,01
. 6 02/04/96 - 02/10/96 0.95 1.00
. 7 02/11/96 A 02/17/96 0.94 O.~9
· 8 02/18/96 - 02/24/96 0.514 0.99
* 51 02/25/96 - 03/02/96 0.94 0.99
*10 01/03/96 - 03/09/96 0.94 O.~9
*11 03/10/96 - 03/16/96 0.95 1.00
*lZ 03/17/9' - 03/23/96 0.95 1.00
*13 O!/24/96 - 03/30/96 0.96 1.01
14 03/31/96 - 04/06/96 0.9& 1.01
15 04/07/96 - 04/13/96 0.97 1.02
16 04/14/96 - 04/20/9i 0.97 1.02
17 04/21/96 - 04/27/96 O.gB 1.03
18 04/28/96 - 05/04/96 0.99 1.04
19 05/05/96 - 05/11/96 1.00 1.05
20 05/12/96 - 05/18/96 1.02 1.07
21 05/19/96 - OS/25/96 1.02 1.07
22 05/26/96 - 06/01/96 1.03 1,08
:z22i 06/02/96 - 06/08/96 1.03 1.08
06/09/96 - 06/15/96 '1.04 1.09
O'/16/~' - 06/22/96 .1.05 1.10
26 06/23/96 - 06/~9/96 .1.06 1.11
27 06130/96 - 07/06/96 . 1.06 . 1.11
28 07/0'196 - 0'/13/96 "1.07- 1.12
29 . 07/14/96 - 07120/96 .1.0a" 1.13
30 0'11411/96 - 07127196 '1.07" 1.12
31 07/28/96 - OB/03/ill> . 1.06" D 1.11
3~ 08/04/96 - 08/10/96 .1.0S- \.o~ 1.10
33 08/11/96 - 08/17/96 . 1.04- 1.09
34 08/18/96 - 08/24/96 .1.0S" 1,10
3S 08/25/96 - 08/~1/96 .1.05. 1.10
36 09/01/96 - 09/07/96 '1.06' 1.11
37 09/08/96 ~ 09/14/96 1.06. 1.1:
38 09/15/96 - 09/:Z1/96 1.07" 1.12
39 09/22/96 ~ 09/28196 1.06. 1.11
40 09/29196 - 10/05/96 .1.04 1.09
41 10/06/96 - 10/12/96 1.0l 1.07
4~ 10/13/96 - 10/19/96 1.01 1.06
43 10/20/96 - 10/26/96 1.00 1.05
44 10/27/96 - 11/02/96 1.00 1.05
45 11/03/96 11/09/96 1.00 1.05
46 11/10/96 - 11/16/96 0.99 1.04
47 11/17/96 - 11/23/96 0.98 1,03
48 11/24/96 - 11/30/~6 0.98 1,03
49 l2/01/96 - 12/07/96 0.97 1.02
50 12/08/~' - 12/14/96 O.9S -d 1.81
51 12/15/96 - 12121196 0.95 -4 , nn
52 13/33/96 - 12/28/96 0.97 1.02
53 12/29/96 ~ 12/31/96 0.98 1.03
· Peak. S...on
T~.,.J}L 53,/5
~
5'3 wE.EKS
HOC"; 0.95
6iP91
~
--
(~I 002 !...3 ),
t 9~ J.,
637'1
( /.~O~i3)
DEe 30 '97 14:37
-
-
&, '3 '1''/ A PI
:. 6/02
!Jpj
~
I, 002 ~3
,A V 6, YChi!.I..j' #F'
25-FZB-lg97 17108112.17
; . "';'
'301-~XSEA$ON.TKT
'. . ..~ .'," ..: '. .: '.......4. .'\. .
DEC-22-1997 14:57
PEC TRRFFIC ENG
561 478 5770
P.02/02
, . ~
. 11
TABLE E-l
GENERAUZED ANNUAL AVERAGE DAIL V VOLUMES FOR FLORlDA'S
URBANIZED AREAS.
STATE TWO-WAY AATERIALS FREEWAYS
UNlNTERRvnED FLOW G...., 1 ,(within urbaaiDcJ lrea _ 500.000 IlId I.... 10 or pIIIiag
~~ \..~ 5 nUJa of 1M JIIiawY city SlItUAI___ diIIric:I)
~loIScrYkz
1AvtJ 01 Savicz I.- A Ii c 0 E
'lMa A B C D E 4 22.OlIO 3'.200 52.900 67.000 10.100
2 Ulldly. 8,900 13.900 11.900 24,800 33.100 6 33.100 '2.900 79.400, 100.600 126.900
4OiY, 21.500 35.100 "'.100 60,100 71.600 B ".100 70.500 105.900 134.100 169.%00
6 Diy, 32.200 53.700 75.200 90.200 107.400 10 55.%00 88.200 132.<<JO 167.100 211.400
12 63.200 101.100 151.100 t 92,200 242.300
INI'ERRtJPTED I'LOW
G......1 (wUhin .lbuiad aRa alld .. in Cirwp 1)
a_ .. (~IO 2.491ianllzed lnIe_ioaI per mile) Lewd of SeMce
&.Pet of Service LaacJ /It B C 0 E
LlI_ A" B C D... E..~ .. ~.3IlU 32.'W .UW 61.8W 74.5UU
2 UddiY. 12.6llO U,2QO 16,600 17.000 c 6 30.600 48,900 73.400 93.000 U7.JOO
"OiY, %7.900 33,300 35,100 3.S,800 L 8 40,800 6.5.200 97.900 124.000 156.300
6Div. 43.2DO "'.400 '3;700 13.700 A JO .51.000 81.500 122,300 1".000 19.5.400
IDly. . .53.800 62,000 6.5.100 65,800 s 12 '1.400 93,200 140,000 177.300 223.600
.......-.--. -- ' -.......
a.u Ib (2.50 10 ...50 si&JWiAd imawaiau pet lIIiIe) ~ ~-..~- .~.. NONoSTATE ROADWAYS
Level of ScMc:c " MAlOR CJTYICOUNTY ROADWAYS
lAIlII A.. 8"" C D E Lnet 0( $moil>>
2 U"iv, 1.800 14.300 15,900 Lana A.. B"" C 0 E
4DlY. 19.200 ,- 31.100 34,000 2 Uadiv 10.900 14.200 ",sIlO
6 Diy. 29,300 47.500 51.400 4Div, 24.400 31.000 33.2IlO
IDly. 3UIIO 51.000 62,900 6 Diy, 37,800 .7,500 .50.200
.CIIIa U (IIIOIC ..... 4.$0 lipaliaIcI inllllCClioGl per lIIihr IIId IlOI
with.. pIiInIry ci.y czllltallluiDea dilu1cl ollrfluialcl
.. CMlr 500,000)
Lcwl of ServioI
8"" C-. D
11,100
26.500
40.'700
49.700
E
15.zoo
33.400
~600
61.aoo
LDu
2 UMiY.
4 Diy.
6 DiY,
lOiy,
A..
Qaalll (man ilia. 4.50 IiJMI- _....... pet mile ud wiGiII
prilMfY city QIIlftJ bwinas disUict of IIlbuiad
ana over 500.000)
Levd 0( Service
8" C-- D
13.200
29,500
.....100
'''.700
E
14.aoo
32.600
"9.300
6o.Joo
LlI_
2Undl\r.
4 Diy.
6 Diy,
a Djy.
A..
OTBER SIGNALIZED ROADWAYS
c (lipIIiZIcI ~ aulYIiS)
L Lnd oISuYi&:c
A u.. AU 8-. C D E
s 1 UGdiv 5.200 10.200 11.700
s of 11400 2"600 25100
u
c
"
A
S
S
HI
LIlla
2
2
MuIli
M.lli
ADJVS'I'MENTS
DMDEDIUNDIVIDED
(Ikcr ~ lWO-way wIIllIC iIItlticalCd pIl'&lI")
MIdiIft Len Tim BaY' Acljushnall FICIOIS .
DWidcd Yes .5..
Uadi9IdolI No .~
UadiYiIIoll Y II .,..
\l...i.... No .25"
ONE-WAY
(II'" COI1QJIOOCIiIIa IWO-way WlI_ illllicaled penal)
One-Way Ccmapondi. Ad;........
Lana Two-WI}' lA.. FICIlII'
2 .. ~
3 6 ~
.. 8 ~
, 8 -25"
".__.... _._..._..__ ...--'......."..._ "n.___wIIdI.._.....-........___ _ftlpKiIic...............
"................_.....----...--.. _...... ......_......___. Y____I_.....'nlklAADn__
'-'-IC,.- - .,...,_1..._._..... ........1..."__ ~ 11_ ""'"'" _......nftic. -................ no.............
...-'of__......_ IM__
c:-____
"---...--------
......____of~ 19ft,
t5DUT
IIIllM5
E -1
TOTAL P.02
::0 ::0 :;0 (') G) :;0 ::0 :;0 (') r-
III III III a ll) III III III :;r
iii m !e. ::J (Il m !e. !e. c: ~ e.
==ll)<en=ll)lUo('D..!...
c:~_ c:c::;r'l\)
ii3 iii' ~ ii3 ii3 or 3
::J::JO ::J::J 3=
- o::J - - ='<
I III I I '<
;;;00 ":J:
lC:::r 0 ~ to'
_ :;r
~ CD ." ~
c: ac:
.., a ..,
5 Co 5
< <
CD CD
.., ""
....................(Il...............ll)!=1-!=1-
'O'O'O'Om'O'O'Ogc:c:
ggggggggm
(Il (Il (Il (Il ::J Ul (Il (Il
;.~;....;-.. ;..~;...
.....
o W O)w
.....~~:c. :.....:....~ (11
(1INCOO ~""'''''''''''(x)0>
.....CJ1.....~.....CJ1CJ1.....~(11~
0' 0' 0' ::J
:::l "'3 .., ll)
::S N..... 30>N
c: c: 0 W c: W 0
iU m ~ :--l ....-Iii' ~ ~
wco~ .....w .....
0> <0 (X) NO> 0.....
CO.....NN.....N W
w:....'Otn.....w'O..........Q)(o
O>O>~.....~.....OO>(1I(1I~
<OO>.....N(X)O.....NOOQ)
~~.....~CJ1~W.....
.....NCJ1CJ1(X)~O(1l
O>OoooOCooo
'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.
W W .....
m'Ow:....~CJ1O>.....
<0 0> ow W(X) 0"'"
~..........O~<ON~
(Il (Il
c: c:
3 3
NWNNNN
CJ1 N CJ1 (11 CJ1 CJ1
'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.
NN
00
?ft.'#.
..... .....
~:....~~ .....w.....
.....ww~.....(X)(1IO>
(X)..... (1IN <0 0"'" N
..... .....
..... <0
00
.....
O>WN..... ..... W
:....(O(OW<ON(1I'O~.....O>:....
.....<OO>O~W~CJ1(X)(1IQ)(1I
~0>Q)CJ100>""'~0>00Q)
r-
IU
::J
Q.
C
(Il
CD
C
::J
;::;.:
Ul
::J
-
CD
::J
!!!.
::0
ll)
eD
~G)
:::l.a
"O(Il
(Il Ul
:;O"1J
lUll)
eDg:
I
tT
'<
~"1J
:::l.ll)
"0 (Il
(Il (Il
I
c-
'<
:;0:;-
IU-
ro~
::J
~
~-
.., ::J
-C' co
(Il ""
::J
!!!.
~z
:::l.CD
-
(Il
"1J
:;0
o
"1J
o
en
m
a
)>
"1J
"1J
o
:;0
~
r-
-
.....
-
.J 3:
::rc:
c:;:;:
,1';""" -.
o..!...
:;rl\)
~.
-<
N
o
'#.
"0
l\)
(Il
(Il
I
tT
':<
::J
a
Co
..,
<'
CD
::0:;0:;0:;0::07
CDmlllmm'
oriiiiiiQ)~~
====ll)ll)
c: c:
.., ""
IU IU
::J ::J
--
I I
"J:
m to'
0- :::r
,,~
o c:
8.3
~~
-m
""
-a.....ar.....ar.~.....~-"mQ.
'O'O'O'O'O'O'Ogc:
OOOOOOOCD
OOOOOOO(ll
Ul Ul Ul (Il (Il Ul Ul
:-..:.;-..;....;-..:-..:--
-
:::r
..,
c:
..... .....
W 0
.....N 0>
:""'i-..>(1I ~ ~--(11
WCJ1Q)~WCJ1W~O>
0'0'0'0' ::J
...,~-.-. D)
33330>NN
c: c:c:c: woO>
ii'mmm~?'~
.....WN
NO>-- .....
!D......? N--..... ~
0> -- 0 co-""''O:'''' .....-(11
WO>N~""'N~(1I<O
wO>(X)(1IQ).....OON
~~~~N--~
NNWO'lOO'lO>
000000000
'#.?ft.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.
W W N
m'ON~(1I--CJ1
NO>ON~CJ1N
O>.....N(1I~~(1I
Ul (Il
c: c:
3 3
NNNNN
(11 0'1 (11 (11 (11
'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.
..... .....
~N""''''''(1IN--
(1I.....ow~.....O'l
<O.....O>O~(X)~
.....
O>WNN..... .W
:....tnm:....wmo>~.....o>
.....~(X)--<OWO'lO>CJ1.....
O>(x)(x)<OO--CJ1NO~
r-
IU
::J
Q.
C
(Il
m
C
::J
;::;.:
(Il
:;,
co
:;,
!!!.
:;0
ll)
co
~G)
-. ..,
o
(Il (Il
Ul
:;O"1J
IU l\)
cog:
I
tT
'<
~"1J
:::l. ll)
(Il
(Il (Il
I
tT
'<
N
o
'#.
:;0-
lUa
-m
CD ..,
:;,
~
<0
.....
Q)
~-
.., :;,
-c'eD
(Il ""
::J
~
~z
:::l.CD
'0 -
Ul
o
::0
~
Z
)>
r-
)>
"'tl
"'tl
o
::0
~
r-
~
o
o
r-
CD
::0
C5
:J:
~
"'tl
s;:
(")
m
W
-
.....
-
<0
.....
First Baptist Church - Traffic Analysis (SW 8th Street)
(Net Trips)
Current Peak Traffic Count (Dec. 11 & 12) 6374
Adjusted to Annual Average Daily 6102
Project Traffic (Health Care Campus) 1997 798.8 north assignment (%) 40
Total Traffic 6900.8
Deficit or Surplus based on 8,800 LOS 1,899 assume 8,800 average annual trips for "C"
^
Addition of Vested PCD Trips 3,998 799.2 north assignment (%) 20
Addition of Crystal Key-
remaining units to be built 56
trip generation 392
assignment(% ) 40 156.8
Addition of duplex designated site
units to be built 16
trips generation (10 trips each) 160
assignment(%) 40 64
Addition of vested portion for Church site
750 trips reduced by assignment of (%) 40 300
Total Traffic 8220.8
Deficit or Surplus based on 8,800 LOS 579 assume 8,800 average annual trips for "C"
MITIGATION
Reduction in office space
Area Trips Assigned (40%)
22500 768.825 307.53
33000 1127.61 451.044
35000 1195.95 478.38
36000 1230.12 492.048
37000 1264.29 505.716 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NA
Deficit or Surplus based on 8,800 LOS
BOOSE CASEY
Fax:561-82D-0381
Dee 31 '97 15:32
P.Ol
,""W O,.",CE.5
BOOS€ CASEY CIKLIN LuBITZ MARTENS McBANE &. O'CONNELL
1\ p.....T'''IeRSH'!> 'NCI.U(>IJ"O PFlQPIt..IO......~ ,AS50CIA"rIQN$
JO&ItPH I.. ...",.;!l:........N. .I".
."\"IeE Q. Al..EXANDItA. P,A.
.J~R"Lt; $. ElE~R. ",A.
WI,-~'A'" A. 8QO~. tJ'I p.~~
,",O>1N D. sQVl<'" .......
1.0NNI~ 1<. DI'lOW"'E
......T'/itICK v. CM~Y. po....
PATN.c'... "'"'. CHRl8"T1...H~EH
ALAN oJ. ClKL.IN. .,A.
M'CH....!~ w. OCNN_
ROB!RT ~. c~r;. ,......
..ON...LO It. CRtttSCCNZO
M"'RC: .. goa'N, P.A.
J.t,l!;ON S. HAliCI.";O"'"
W. J"'Y HUNa1'ON. oJl'l.. P.....
Via Faaimill! 375-6259
DEB""- .... oJENKS. P....
.FU~!'oI B. ....CI.L..YN, ..A.
c;AEOOR'I' s. K IIIC
CHAl'll.&S". LUBITZ. P.....
e;tlW'N C, I.\JH!JPOI'lD
R:C...-o I.. MAI'lTENS !>."'.
~oula R. I4CBI\Wr;, ,......
TIMCITriV flit. Mf;CAJilTIo4Y". P.A._
BRI..." M. O'eONNEI.I.. P.....
"'MlL D o'CCNNE;'-L. ,",I'l., ,......
..J. I(<)"'Y PAAl<HU"ST
c_R*ES I.. P1c""n. .."'.
T:MQTHY oJ. ROOl(lJ
..JOMN It. YOUNO. P.....
PHII.~II" D. o'cONNItLL. SR. (1907.1oer.
VI' COUN&EL.
,)U~,E; "'N'" ...~LllIO...
JOHN _. ",,."'SEN
NOR'Tl-lElRlbGE lOWf:" 1. 1i1n< "'\.00'"
$,t NORTt4 I"U>OI.CR 1:ll'lI"E
"""!IT P"'-PoI Io~CH, F'\.ORIOA 33401
T~LE..to1c)N~ (H1) .~~.seoo
ttL.~COPIEl' (501) 820.0381
.......LIHO AOPR&;SS
".0. BOX 4fae
WEs'r P"'L"" ItACH. "L 33402-4826
December 31, 1997
lambri Heyden, AICP
Planning & Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Re: First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach Applic:ationg
Dear Tambri:
My client, Howard Scharlin as Trustee for the W Golhright Place Joint Venture, has requested that I send
you this letter to express a few concerns we have with regard to the First Baptist Church of Boynton
Beach ("Chufeb") applications and their impact on the buiLdout of the Woolbright PCD. We expressed
some of these concerns at the December 22. 1997 meeting of the Planning & Development Board.
1. Restri~tj.ve Covenants: Please modify the Staff Reports on the various applications to indicate
that my client has never breached the restrictive covenants placed on the Church parcel. Those
restrictive covenants expired by their very termg after five years from the dale of the completion
of S.W 8th Street from Woolbright Road to the Church r>arcel (1990}. In the event a sanctuary
was constructed on that parcel during that five year time period, several uses would not have
been permitted to be constructed witrjn the Woolbright PCD. These uses included automobile
service stations (excluding gasoline stations). liquor lounges and stores (excluding the sale of
alcohol in conjunction with a restaurant use), and drive-thru restaurants to list a few. As the
Church did not build within the fIVe year time frame, the restrictive covenants expired and my
client was free to construct whatever uses were approved by the City of Boynton Beach.
lnterestingly, the only use that was constructed in the peD which was listed as an objectionable
and therefore prohibited use for the five year period was the drive-thru restaurant. Furthermore,
the Church was marketing the property a couple of years before the five year restrictive covenant
period even expired. Finally, you should know that my client submitted five different contracts
to purchase that parcel from the Church with our intended use to be 140 town homes. Please
modifY the Staff Report accordingly.
BOOSE CASEY
FQ.x:561-82Cl-0381
Dee 31 '9/ 15:32
P.Cl2
..
Tambri Heyden, AlC
December 31, 1997
Page 2
2. FP&L Tr~nll.",ission Lines: It was represented to the Planning & Development Board and
Leisureville constituents that the FP&L transmission lines on the westerly perimeter of the
Church parcel, adjacent to Leisureville, eould be relocated underground or moved. That
statement may not be accurate. The Woolbright Joint Venture moved the FP&L transmission
lines as was required by agreement with the Church. It is our understanding that they may not
now be relocated.
3 Woolbri~ht Maintenance Association: It is imperative that a condition of approval be included
which requires the Church to contin.ue to be obligated to pay iu fair share of the landscape
maintenance for the S.W 8th Street medlans and right-of-way: preservation area and lake. We
strenuously object to any withdrawal frem that obligation.
4. Iraffic.: Our traffic engineer, Maria Palumbo, P.E., is currently reviewing the traffic analysis
prepared by Robert Renebaum, P .E. of Simmons & White, Inc. We will provide you with our
comments as soon as her review is complete. Our main concern is that the approximately 2,800
trips being proposed is over 2,000 more trips than originally allocated to this parcel when the
Woolbright PUD was approved. Such increase in traffic may negatively impact the build out of
our project which is vested for 157,000 square feet If this parcel is permitted to exceed the
vested trips, we would expect that we be allowed the same opportunity to expand our project
parameters as long as Palm Beach County's Traflk Performance StandlU'ds Ordinance is met.
Obviously, if they remove the 67,500 square foot medical office element, their traffic count
would be considerably reduced. If there was a market for such use as they suggest, the medical
office complex could be located on my client's four Ilcre parcel on S.W. 8th Street which would
be directly across from an ACLF and nursing home facilities. Furthermore, the 140 townhomes
my client proposed to develop on this property if the Church accepted his contract, would
generate less than 1,000 trips instead of the 2,800 which are proposed. When we receive our
traffic engineer's comments on the review of the project's traffic analysis, we will provide you
with our comments.
Please call me to discuss our concerns once you hav~ had an oppOltunity to review this letter.
L
GSKlag
27~64
cc: Michael Morton (561-241-0646)
FR~ HERDQUARTc~S
PHONE NO.
301 352 5238
Cec. 22 1997 a3:50PM Pi
To: P18..Ln~ne: a~1d ZO::'~:'l6 0:"1"'.::- c tor
City ~f Bcyntcn B~~oh .
-
.t~ 00 ~ U W ~-~
DE.C 2. 2. IIR
1 1
- ~NN\NG AND
ZON\NG DEPT.
Fro~ : Allan D. Silver
606 Cans.,l 'ilay
Boynton Eeac~ FL33426
Date: December 22, 19~7 .
I a.:j', ~ hOlileo......ner 'Nho 'rT~ 11 be e.ffectcd by the zcni.c:g
cb~n6~ reo.:u€'-sted for "he 14. \8 acr"=e !:l.t Wool-ori~ht ang
sw 8th Avenue.
I believe th8t th# property ehoulo be required to
~rov1Je auppreseion of noise and odor ~uffic1ent to
aonf1ne the~ to the property itself.
In addition, there 6h~u1d be sn eight toot fence on t~e
property perimeter abutt1ns th~ ~eishcorln5 re~ldential
,ro,ert1ee. Also, six feot evergreens shou:d be planted
on the p~o~erty on the side of the fence feeing the
reelde~oes. The&e trees should be mp.1nta1ned in perpetuity.
Thamk you.
~:fj.~
/1. "V'~
.\jL l .;\-'
Y' ~S
.!/ f21f
~(S\ .J-
~~~
~
-
i i ~ ~ UNRUH, SMITH & ASSOG~TES
· Public poliC)' and Strategic Planning
. Land Use and Zoning 1\:latters
· Legislative RegulatOl)' .Action
· Government Relations
· Privatization Issues
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mike Rumpf, Planner
City of Boynton Beach
FM: Chris Ker~"
DT: December 19, 1997
flo)r: ~ ~ W ~ ~.).
,WI IB 19. lliJi
1 C]J
PLANNING ANO
ZONINQjlEPT.
RE: Woolbright Place PUD applications
Our Flle# 13712187.ckt
I want to confirm three points we discussed during a Thursday, December 18th phone conversation.
The first concerns the necessary original consent form for the Woolbright Place PUD. I have
attached the form for the PUD signed by TCR Boynton Beach I Limited Partnership and TCRDAD
Vinings at Boynton Beach II L.P. Limited. This is the original of the copy that was faxed to you last
week. I believe that it satisfies the consent requirement which concerned you. If it is unsatisfactory
in any way please call me as soon as possible.
Second, I want to confirm my responsibilities for providing you with a survey for the Woolbright
Place PUD. I appreciate your flexibility in allowing me to provide the sealed survey on Wednesday,
December 24th. As you requested, I will provide a sketch of the property certified by a surveyor
before our Monday, December 22nd meeting. Based on our discussion, I have employed a surveyor
to complete a survey of the boundary of the PUD with the church parcel excluded. The sealed survey
will include an accurate legal description of the subject parcel and a computation of the total acreage
to the nearest 1/100 of an acre but no interior improvements such as a tree survey, as this isn't
related to the land use or zoning issues involved in the application. If I have misinterpreted any of
the above, please call me to discuss it directly; as I have a survey crew in the field working on this
over the weekend to meet the Wednesday deadline.
Third, I will provide you with the proposed LVI for the amended PUD Master Plan that you asked
about. Hopefully I will have that information later today.
I truly appreciate the help you have given to me thus far on this project. Feel free to call me with any
other questions or comments at 835-8505.
cc: Ellen Smith, AICP
attachments
105 South Narcissus Avenue. Suite 503 · West Palm Beach. Florida 33401 · 561-835-8505 · Fax: 561-655-5525
- -
TCR
T~\{\lfLL CRO\\' RFSlDDlTIAI
6400 Congres, Avcnuc
Suite 2000
BncJ RJtOll, FL .BclS7
(56\.\ Lj97 -9700
FAX ;:;6]] 997-81149
December 12, 1997
Ms. Tambry Hayden, AICP
Planning & Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
RE: Woolbright Place PUD: Amend Boundaries To Delete Church Property
(File No. 1371 I 247.ccsl)
Dear Ms. Hayden:
This letter provides consent from Boynton Beach I Limited Partnership and TCRDAD Vinings at Boynton
Beach II Limited Partnership, the respective owners ofVinings I and II within the Woolbright Place PUD, in
support of the referenced Comprehensive Plan application. I understand that Unruh, Smith & Associates will
apply to amend the Comprehensive Plan's density designation to bring Woolbright Place PUD's density
designation into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan after deleting the church property.
This support is given on the same condition as our prior consent, requiring the parcel to remain in the existing
master stormwater drainage, treatment and conveyance system, including the payment of fees to the
Woolbright Place Master Association for maintenance of the system as well as S.W. 8th Street Right-of-Way
maintenance for which the Association is responsible.
Please do not hesitate to call me if you have further questions.
Very truly yours,
Boynton Beach I Limited Partnership
By: TCR Boynton Beach Limited Partnership
By: TCR SF A Boynton Beach, Inc.
BY:~
Greg IgI , Vice President
TCRDAD Vinings at Boynton Beach II L. P.
By: TCR Vinings at BO)'nton Beach II L.P.
By: TCR SF A Vinings at Boynton Beach II, Inc.
By ~~-
Greg Igle art, Vice PresIdent
cc: Mike Rumpf, Planning & Zoning - VIA FAX 561/375-6259
Ellen Smith, Unruh, Smith & Associates -VIA FAX 561/655-5525
Woolbright Place Master Association
41>4" q1-QO~
ill
~@~u~rn
NOV I 9 9J1
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-517
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
TO:
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planing and Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent }t-J <<:: Q [P"f
1 5t Baptist Church Masterplan ReVi~n I Rezoning Request
RE:
Date:
November 19, 1997
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the plans for the 151 Baptist Church
Masterplan Revision and Rezoning Request. There are no recreation-related issues
on either of these matters. We recommend that these plans proceed through the
normal review process.
JW
..
To:
Fax:
From:
Date:
Pages:
From the desk of...
Michael Rumpf
Senior Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
561-375-6260
Fax: 561-375-6259
Pete Mazzella
731-0065
Michael Rumpf
December 16, 1997
6, including cover sheet.
As discussed, please find info on two application: 1 ) First
Baptist Church which proposes the 14 acre church parcel
within the PUD be reclassified/rezoned to allow for the
health care campus consisting of a 120-bed nursing home,
a 3-story, 67,500 office building, and a 60 bed CLF or
ACLF; and 2)the amendment of the PUD to reclassify the
remainder of the PUD from Moderate Density Residential
(7.26 du/acre) to High Density Residential (10.8 du/acre)
to accommodate the density increase resulting from the
removal of 14 acres from the master plan. Thanks for you
review and comments. Mike.
-
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-528
TO:
FROM:
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to the Director of Utilities
Daniel DeCarlo ~~
DATE:
November 6, 1997
RE:
First Baptist Church - LUARlRezoning 97-002
This office is processing the above application for a land use amendment and rezoning.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Department of Community Affairs for
compliance review, I am requesting that you provide me with specific information on the
current availability of facilities that would serve the subject property and a statement
indicating that there are adequate urban services available to serve the maximum demand
as would be allowed by the proposed land use classification.
To assist you with your review, I have enclosed a location map and application which
includes data on changes in potable water and sanitary sewer demands. I hope that given
the size of the subject property, you are able to provide a specific statement which
indicates that this application would have no negative impact on service availability.
The state has a specific time frame within which this information must be transmitted to
them. Therefore, your response would be greatly appreciated at your earliest convenience.
If you have any questions, please call me at (407) 375-6260. Thank you.
Attachments
S:\projects\First Baptist Church of BB\utilityc
Tract F, Woolbright Place Plat No.1, according to the Plat thereof as .recorded in Plat Book 67,
page 47 through 49 in the Public Records of Palm Beach County, FlOrida.
All interested parties are notified to appear at said hearing in person or by attorney and be
heard. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Planning and Deve.lopme~t
Board and/or City Commission with respect to the matter considered at these meetIngs ~III
need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim
record of the piVceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is to be based.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
(561) 375-6260
J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\First Baptist Church of BB\lUAR\legalnot.doc
DEC-15-1997 15:52
Departm.nt of En,iRl!Cll"ing
and Pub IiI!; Work,
PO. !ox 2' 22Cl
Wes: Palm l!e~ch. FL J'416.122~
(561) 684'4000
hnp:l/wwwco.palm.be,ch n us
.
Palm Beaeh County
BNfd of c.,unty
Co",,,,'uloners
!urt A&ronson, Chairman
Maude Ford lee, Vice Ch,jr
IUren T M~rcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H ~ewe:l
Mary MCC.1rlY
I(en l. Fost!!r
County Ad",inistraCQr
!l.obert weIsman P.E.
.....Il EqualOJ)pornl...ry
/1/Jirrnativc I'\crion Employer'
@ primed on recyCIM1 fJIIPBr
PBC TRRFFIC ENG
561 4~8 57?0 P.01/03
TGJ..ECOPIER TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
TRAFFlc..DIYJSIO~
FAX NUMBER: (561'-) 478.577Q
...............****.........**.*.........*****........****.**.**
TRANSMm AL DATE: /2 - / ~ 7' 7
PLEASE DEUVER THE FOLLOWING TELECOPIED MATERIAL TO:
.........**********...*.......***.......*************...........
RECElVER'S NAME:
!t/~~
1Z1(~j
OFFICE NAME:
OffiCE TELEPHONE NUMBER: c5!JJ 37') _~?t3
OffiCE F AlOI~~: -r" <5I.J-> "37' . h.{, S'"t
SUBJECT: ~ UJ f f r /,..(; DrJfh~ z;,,{IC~
-li5 IJ f'rs! of ;rw~. a se~?J;{ll.)~-/ IV,;/
r/;f'5f?M'IIbMrro0
.....................................*.*.....*..*................
SENDER'S NAME:
ROB
PIn;\Nt
c5i.l.) LD ~4
- 4010
OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER:
...........................*****.*...............................
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (including this transmittal cover sheet): 3
PLEASE CALL TO VERIFY RECEIPT OF MATERIAL: YES U NO (d")
NAME OF FAX OPERA TOR:
DEC-15-1997 15:52
561 478 5770
P.02/03
PBC TRRFFIC ENG
'lOl~(jMr:: . REPCJRi; ..... --.....- n".... '......
V~ Jme Report with 24 Hour Tot~.s Page
*******X***********************************~X~~******************************-)
Data File D1211001.PRN
Station 000000000001
Identification 000000000013 Interval
Start date Dee 11, 97 start time
Stop date Dee 12, 97 Stop time
City/Town CAR County
Location SW8TH ST 400' S OF OCEAN AVE (BB)
*******~*****~*x**********************************~.**************************~
Dee II/Dee 12 Northbound Volume for Lane 1
15 minutes
11: 15
11: 15
P.B. COUNTY
------------------------~._--------------~--------------------------------------
Ene Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
-.....------
15 11 5 4 1 3 2 ~, 16 43 :.0 52 6C
30 7 4 4 1 0 1. 14 33 56 47 50 3~
45 13 5 4 2 2 ~ 16 36 49 39 55 5::
00 13 2 '3 1 6 4 27 47 64 67 53 6.::
--------
Hl" Total 44 16 15 5 11 16 62 132 212 203 210 214
------~----------------~.----------------~--------_._-~---------------------------
End "rime 12 13 14 \5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2.:3
--------
15 58 53 60 58 86 92 50 43 21 26 34 27
30 55 56 :'4 70 79 70 59 :37 34 2 f.. 47 18
45 58 S6 66 75 78 92 40 41 37 26 17 16
00 40 61:} 57 99 7S 60 31 34 28 3:2 13 16
--------
Hr Total :211 234 237 ~~O2 318 314 180 155 1.20 109 111 77
-----------------------~--~--------------------~~-~~-----~-~-~--~---------~--_.,.
24 Hour Total 3508
~M peak hour begins: 11:30 AM peak ~olume: 229 Peak hour ~actor : 0.91
p~ peak hour begins: 15:45 PM p~ak volume: 342 Peak hour fac~or : 0.86
**********************~*~******************************************************
Dee 11/Dec 12 Southbound Volume for Lane 2
----------------------~---------------------~-----~-~----~----~----------~------
End Tirne 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
--------
15 8 2 4 -. 0 4 12 44 6" 48 37 33
.I.
30 5 0 1 , 1 3 12 52 62 39 31 33
~
45 4 2 1 1 4 4 39 59 57 42 40 S6
00 3 1 0 0 4 5 40 84 51 54 48 42
--------
Hr Total 20 5 6 3 9 16 103 239 234 183 156 164
-----------------------------~------------------------------------------------...
End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 1.6 19 20 21 22 23
--------
15 59 36 63 43 65 54 52 38 28 2j, 19 14
30 39 36 51 50 45 46 42 35 22 19 13 9
45 52 49 56 42 56 44 38 21 23 16 14 10
00 43 38 56 57 50 54 36 30 17 16 3 8
--------
Hi Total 193 159 226 192 216 198 168 124 90 72 49 41
------------------------------------------------------------------------------~-
24 Hour Total 2866
AM peak hour begins : 07:30 Al't peak volume : 269 Peak hOL<r factor : 0.80
PM peak hour osgins = 14:00 PM peak volume : 22(.., Peak hour factor : 0.90
******~*****************************x*~~**********************************x~*~**
DEe-15-1~97 15:53
PBe TRRFFIC ENG
561 478 5770 P.03/03
PA;..t 'EACH CO~~~f1E. T~@~6~l ENGINE 'tNG
~olume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page ;
*****~~********************************~*~******~***************~*************~
Data File D1211001.PRN
Station OOOOOOO~OOOl
Identification 000000000013 Interval
Start date Dee 11, 97 Start ti~e
Stop date Dee 12, 97 Stop time
City/Town CAR County
Location swaTH ST 400' 5 OF OCEAN AVE (SB)
**********~*************~**********************~******************************~
Dee 11/Dee 12 Total Volu~e for All Lanes
15 minutes
11:15
11:15
P.B. COUNTY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fnd T" 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
, l me
--------
15 19 7 8 2 3 6 17 60 107 98 89 9::
30 1 .., 4 5 2 1 4 26 85 118 86 81 71
.~ &..
45 17 7 5 3 6 13 SS 95 106 81 95 100:;
00 J6 3 '1 1 10 q 67 131 115 121 101 lO~
-------......
Hr Tot-a 1 64 21 21 8 2C 32 165 371 446 366 366 37E
-----------------------------~-~------------------------------------------~----
End Tirne ::_2 1'3 14 15 16 17 lA 19 20 21 22 2:;
--------
15 :17 89 123 101 151 146 102 81 49 47 53 41
30 94 92 105 1.20 124 116 10: 72 56 44 60 21
45 1:0 105 122 117 134 136 78 62 60 42 31 2E:
00 A3 107 113 156 125 114 67 64 45 48 16 2t
--------
Hr Total 404 393 463 494 534 51.2 348 279 210 181 160 IH
--------------------------------~--~-------------------------------------------
24 Hour Total b374
AM peak hour begins : ~7:45 AM peak volume : 462 Peak hour faetor : o .8E
PN peak hour begins : 15:45 PM peak volum~ : 565 Peak hour factor : 0.91
***~~~x*****************************:t********~~xx*****************************~
TO:HL P.03
1, S- "g~h ." 33426
1\ ~ Be8C ,n.
C Ray Phelan
PO Box 554
Char I estown. RI 02813-0554
-_..-~>-~ '.'-
~-
N.W.F.
rn @ ~ f1 ~.fi r? j-"\'
rn I' IS H \'.!( 'e '.. -.'. '.
n Ii 15 u '. 11 :';!.
----.--....-- , ., I ;
If.C I 5 1991 : JJ
Michael Rumpe
Planning and Zoning Department
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33426
December 12, 1997
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
':%;~'~
Dear Mr. Rumpe;
I am writing because I am unable to attend the December 22nd public hearing. Please
read this into the record.
This is in regards to your notice of land use change on Woolbright Place, plat 1 as
recorded in Plat Book 67 pages 47 through 49 in the public records of Palm Beach County.
I have no problem with the request for the zone change in so far as it effects tract "F'
a parcel of 14.18 acres owned by the First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach Florida.
My concern is for the area in said 14.18 tract "F" on the northwest comer adjacent to
Palm Beach Leisureville. An existing benn on the west side effectively prohibits any over flow
of the 6.2 acre retention pond from flowing on to Palm Beach Leisureville. However, this benn,
at present, ends short of the First Baptist Church property. The result is that heavy rains have
over flowed the retention pond and badly flooded Leisureville and particularly Canal Way, a
private street in Leisureville. This happened within the last 11/2 years.
I am requesting the creation of a small buffer zone(1ess than 1/4 acre) in the northwest
corner of the church property. A buffer zone would:
* preserve two specimen 40 foot hibiscus trees
*be part of the easement for the high voltage transmission lines
*be part of the easement for the 30" culvert draining the retention pond
Additionally, the continuation of the buffer, as required in the Master Plan, should be
positioned south of the transmission line and drainage easements. This would:
* create the small buffer referred to above
* preserve the 2 specimen 40 foot hibiscus trees
* prevent flooding of Palm Beach Leisureville
* create the visual and noise buffer for Palm Beach Leisureville as originally
intended by construction of the benn
I would appreciate being kept infonned of any developments relative to this property.
Thank you for making this part of the public record.
Sincerely yours,
Ray Phelan r-~ .-)
~ o~\cC.Co>--
cc: Kevin Halahan City ofao;Uton Beach
Engineering Department City of Boynton Beach
DEC-12-S7 12,13 FROM, TRAMMELL CROW/RES.
10, 581 SS7 884S
PACE 2
TCR
'lil^'~'~HI i c"~ rW tll'''lllt~' 1,\
(,-10(1 ~ Ulif'II"'-' "\"'"11 ';
'lIil<: :'ill~l
1111...1(.,,,,, II I \.IS
,'lid l 'J'f/ 'J:Wt
I ,^, "\ I l (1 ~ ; ~ '''': :-{C I I"
Dcccntbcr 12, 1997
Ms. Tlllllbry Hayden, AICP
Planning &. Zoning Dir~tor
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Bcuch Boulc\'ard
Boynton Beach, Fl 33435
RE: Woolbriaht Place PUD: Amend Boundaries To Delete Church Property
(File No. 1l711247.ccsl)
Dear Ms. Hayden'
This teller provides consent from Boynton Beach I Limited Partnership and TCRDAD Vinings at Boynton
Beach II LimilCd Partnership, the rcspecti"c owners ofVinings I and II within the Woolbright Place PUO, in
support of lhe referenced Comprehcll$ive Plan application. I W1derstand LhAi Unruh, Snlith & AssocilllCS will
apply to amend the Comprehensive Plan's density designation to bring Woolbright Place PUO"s density
dcsignution into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan after deleting the church property,
This support IS iivcn on ilia same condition IlS our prior consent, requiring Lbo parcelLO remain in the cxisling
master slormwatcr drainage, treatment and conveyance system, including the paymcnl or fees to the
Woolbright Place Master Association for mainlenan<:e of the system as well as S.W. Slit Street Right-of-Way
ma;ntcnlUl<iC for which the Association is responsible.
Please do not hesitate to call mc if you ha,,'c further questions.
Very truly yours,
Boynton Beach I Limited Partnership
By: l'CR Bo).11ton Beach Limited Partnership
By. TCR SFA Boynton Beach,lnc:.
By: ..~1~
Greg Igl. Vice President
TCRDAD Vininls at Boynton Beach II L. P.
By: TeR Vinings at Bo}nton Beach II L.P,
By: TeR SFA Vinings Ai Boynton Beach II, Inc,
By: ~~_
Greg Igle . Vice PreSIdent
cc: Mike Rumpf, Planning & 7.oning. VIA FAX 561/375.6259
Ellen Smith, Unruh, Smith &. Associates. VIA FAX S6 1I6~5.S525
Woolbriaht Place Masler Association
DEC-12-87 12,14 FROM, TRAMMELL CROW/RES.
ID, 561 887 8648
PAGE 3
/.!(:.R
",/~"''''kU. t."'" .t'~lt"lIAI
."
Mil!) C'lI111rc~~ Awn"..
~uite 2000
n(ll'" Unlnn, n. .B.I/P
(5(il) 91J7.9700
.'....X (5(d) ')')].IiM')
October 24, 1997
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: Woolbright Place PVD, Woolbright Place Plat No.lt Master Plan Modification
Application
Dear Sirs:
Boynton Deach I Limited Partnership. and TCRDAD Vinings at Boynton Beach II Limited
Partnership are the respective owners of Vinings I &. II within the referenced PUD. It is our
understanding that The First Baptist Church intends to change its zoning to a mixed use category
providing for a nursing home ALF and some medical office use.
Under that zoning reclassification, we consent to the proposed deletion of Tract F Woolbright Place
Plat No.1 from the approved Master Plan for Woolbright Place PUD, This consent is conditioned
upon the continued participation by the owners of this tract, to be subject to the common area
maintenance of the Woolbright Place PUD drainlllce collection. treatment, and disposal systems as
provided for in the approved drainage plan dated September 27, 1994. This would include paying
drainage and maintenance assessments as a member of Woolbright Place PUD. This should be a
condition to approval and such condition shall be recorded in the land records to run with the land.
It is understood that Unruh, Smith & Associates is acting as agent for the First Baptist Church of
Boynton Beach in this proc~ and that they will provide us with copies of documents in cOMcction
with tho approval process.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (561) 997u9700.
Sincerely,
BY:_~
Greg art, ice President
TeRDAD Vining! at Boynton Beach II
Limited Partnership
By: TCR Vinings at Boynton Beach II
Limited Partnership
By; TeR SFA Vinings at Boynton Beach
II, Inc::.
By: ~ .JP.u<.. - - j..,
Greg Ig ~~nt
Boynton Beach I Limited Partnership
By: TCR Boynton Beach L.P.
By: TCR SF A Boynton Beach, Inc.
cc: Ellen Smith, AICP
Woolbright Place Master Association
To:
Fax:
From:
Date:
Walt Keller &Ass. - Au. Chris
954-755-3866
Michael Rumpf
December 12, 1997
Pages: 2- a, including cover sheet
From the desk of...
Michael Rumpf
Senior Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
561-375-6260
Fax: 561-375-6259
Per our conversation late Friday afternoon, I am providing
you with a copy of the legal ad which provides general
information on the application. Of most concern to us is
the traffic impact on SW 8th Street, which is a local street
that was not analyzed by the traffic study nor is it required
to be per the County Traffic Performance Standards
Ordinanced. Please contact me at your earliest possible
convenience. Thank you. .~t:.. t
l../
c.,(
'---{)s ~
~{I ,
, ~~. ~~<;I
9~ C' (J 150 c/) if
t> .~ Iq'-(,
~t--5 l' Jl /
lY,>> ~ 11'
rfo
.-
- ~lL ; YC~t "1[0) ~ @ ~ u ~ ~1
" ~. r-- IL~ IE 51191 !~
CLEARINGH~;l NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMEND*E
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
TO:
Palm Beach County, Briny Breezes, Delray Beach, Village of Golf, Gulf Stream,
SFWMD, Palm Beach County School Board, Lake Worth Drainage District
TCRPC
FROM:
Anna Yeskey, Clearinghouse
DATE:
December 2, 1997
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a participant local government, this memorandum serves as notice of the following
comprehensive plan amendment(s):
Initiating Local Government: Boynton Beach
Reference #: BOY-13
Date oflocal planning agency hearing for the proposed amendment: December 22,1997
Date of public hearing at which the proposed amendment will be transmitted: January 6, 1998
Nature of plan amendments as you have indicated is desired for review:
adjacent cities
Palm Beach County
amendments relating to traffic circulation or the roadway networks
amendments relating to affordable housing
Amendments related to the following elements:
X land use
traffic circulation
mass transit
ports and aviation
housing
infrastructure sub-elements
coastal management
conservation
recreation and open space
intergovernmental coordination
capital improvements
other
Instructions: Should you have any objections to these proposed amendments, please respond at
least 15 days prior to the transmittal hearing as scheduled.
Page 1 of2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
DATE:
Reference #: ,
LUAR 97-002-
General Information
Initiating Local Government: Boynton Beach, FL
Contact Person: Dan DeCarlo, Assistant Planner
Address: 100 E Boynton Beach Ave. Boynron Rp::!rh, 1<'T 33425
TelephonelFax: 561-375-6261 / 561-375-6259 I
---
Applicant/Agent: First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach/Un~h, Smith & Associates
T elephonelF ax: ,)fil Ri') R')O') I ,)fil h')') 5')?5
I
I
,
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Textual Amendments
General Summary of Amendments:
- amendments relating to traffic circulation or the roadway networks
- amendments relating to affordable housing I
Amendments related to the following elements:
land use I
-
traffic circulation
-
mass transit
-
I - ports and aviation
- housing
i infrastructure sub-elements
i -
I coastal management
I -
I
I conservatIon
-
i recreation and open space
i -
I intergovernmental coordination
\ -
i - capital improvements I.
i H
other ,.
I ii
- II
I Summary of addition (s) to adopted comprehensive plan: ,I
II
i
I
:\'
J
I i:
Page 2 of2
Summary of proposed change (s) to adopted comprehensive plan:
Proposed Amendments to the Future Land U~~ Map
Location of proposed map amendment (include a location map) 1 mile north of S.W. 8th Street
and Woolbright Avenue on the~~tside of S.W. 8th Avenue
Size of Area Proposed for Change (acres) 14.18 acres
Present Future Land Use Plan Designation (include a density/intensity definition) ~~~~!ate Densi.~I._
7.27 DU/ AC (MODR) Residential
Proposed Future Land Use Designation (include a density/intensity definition) - Loca~ Retail
.- -
Cominercial (LRC)
Present Zoning of Site (include a density/intensity definition) PUD
Proposed Zoning of Site (include a density/intensity definition) pr.n
Present Development of Site vacant
Proposed Development of the Site, ifknown (Number of DweIIing Units~ Commercial Square Footage;
Industrial Square Footage~ Other Proposed usage and intensity):
Is proposed change a Development of Regional Impact?
Comprehensive Plan Change Processing
DatelTime/Location Scheduled for Local Planning Agency Public Hearing
December 22, 1997/7:00PM/Boynton Beach City Council Chambers
..
DatelTimelLocation Scheduled for Governing Body Public Hearing
January 6, 1998/7:00PM/Boynton Beach City Council Chambers I
\
Scheduled Date for Transmittal to DCA I
:I~g ~.'~ fIDi];j~-=-';/ ~ -= ~ ~~' .'.~;)
",., 1 ,II. ,. _~.. . \'
"- -' I. ", , ---"'. . . . ~. '<. . "., / . \
..... " . 'I~' _~ '..,::;, .,. _ " .' ,.,~
-~. ~':; "I' "'- ~.., "~_., ..' ", _~ . '.' ......"
I,. '.-: . ~ '.' .' ..~".l' . .. '" " ", ~ ,.".." .,~" 0i!i,.. "'." /' .i' ,,~).'!.. ':"';'~ J-\f'.
.~. ..~-.::! :.1 (0'... . ., - : "~';}'=f.:!r" , . ,. '--<-it · ~..: ; >' / . / ,\~ ':. .~'~\ '~. '\ 1:~,
~ '. ..... ".-, 1-4"; "T 1 AT (.. ':'.>1. ~,,~ ~ V', · '--.i3Y\" " "."'(... (
I ~ . ~ ;': ~:. ~ r'i11;j T. tJ' -.:' ~ -' c--~, ,.' W /;':~$ '(';~ID~. ";::' \'~''':_'!'~'
1 ~-~ ~~'I.m':" ~~~'" 'I,~,.. ~f!"-j'~ : ,:: .; ~ /;"'~....;.~~~;~-:--!.(?~ (.~~~),.:"
/ .'-'L,~ '" ~ :,' ~. 1:.; . ~ '~,' '."": ". ; '. /. .. "T;~ , . '. .. ,. il;L .
I r ~ "-c . - ~ . -. ., 'Y' ;l' "';;:J;;"'f!0\i '. ,,,
1-.....: . r--t~ ~'i2;.': ~'-' 'Ili~ ~i1 ~~ ~~:,~~~i;~' ':,;:' t:~"-- ~'~~~;~".' '. ,;.;. i~i8
e..- ., .."." " '" .. , _ '. <,1 c--- _>:' ,,-., '.. _'><" '" , . . ". . ,
,.. . ..,.... ,'( '," ~"'~,-- h ," ..... , , "_..
mf":' "'. \' "~t';:JiYr:rl-!~ 'I'~I;, ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~t!J'-;' (',' ;..'. .:ii",,~ .:, jJ~~~t
.' '.' - ..' ....,.~. ,~ . .J2. , ,C-- - ".. · '.. . ~" ~ ~~H
. "-". >., "'-'01'-'" ~I~""";~ '" ., '.', . ' .'...' "" ., , ....,.. _ '. ..
~'" '. . . ", "-. .. . I " ,. _ _,.. ''', _. " ,
" ~, '.". -;;' '.,.~, " \,!,".. ' J.; ""',.'". ',,,'. Ii _' _ ",:'" . ,,'. ".. ..' '._ '" -.:' "',, ..:.
.n,.,,. "10. _ .. ''"~ , __ ""'.. ,_ , .' "'". " ", '.',.,
' - , ".. e--'-, - . . ~', '. .... I . .. ". ''',.. .. .. " .~
~ '- st. \ t:W I' " .. T · '~"""'~.~ "'L .... h , ~ .
;~j .. ~~~"~~~":~'~~"~;T;~. '~:'::1~ ~~i~< ~~;;~O~':'_ ig~lr-
'.c '-r.>-, '~, :'1 - ~?Y d<-..~", ." /'V." _',' ,,-W /, .. .0. ~ ..
k,-,., -+-- . P "..,...,. . , ,,- " ' .. ~..0.L<"'.l ""'" . ..' To);V o' f'/,", . ~. ~:8 j'
'~-' .-+.-: \ i~ ~ t '.: './" ,. r (-V I I T~~.\. ~ KiI.~' ' "... ,'f{/'.....>>.r, _ . . ':' "':,,/ ." ,t) ; ~"~
j5. .. ......., n:: ~"", . '" ". ..."/ I , 'Ny "'>~." '.~,~.... ~~ ' .
'. . "(~'( lP"" , .., '/" '''''>. _" 1;tJ~ ,=. '. ",-,/.', '''-:::' u: "m '._
:...;;,~ ':; ..-.. ~,ll.. -~,-, · _" ~ ..... 'n... .. ... . ~.""'.; (,~~
' , "~, '- - -. , -,' ',,;;>, . , , '. '~'- .. <~ ~
~ ;~': '.::::/'T::'~""~' .\ ~r:..'W ",...VJ ...W'''''.>;:~-I~ 6-., ~..... ~:/ ..;: ~'Df~jJTI.: ~j ~:_
-- - l' ." -"'" .. '. . . . '_ . I. .. ., '. '.'. " ,"""'" _<< .
.r--- 8 ;,~}" fir~.8; .'~f{=':.~.'A:l.f..' ..."..:" ~ ~ .tj' ". ':"_ ,;", --,
, ~z :.. ~," < "" ".. .' ,. '." "'....." ';, :.; . "";' ""'" '--,
~w~~8 \\ _:~'.r"'..;r-"\""'Q\'I~III''''1'~Tr'' "I .. . : ..'(-'< "'..'~~', ',,'.. ,,~,x." ':;C:',""
~~:iu Jj-~ -;:/_1. ~_~I"_L..L ~qv/~ ~ l'~ I IJ I I ~.l\Ffi ,~" ,,;-~ :.... ".,;,. '<, K.. ".;: I
....I , I V1l-=-l;:;" .. i8f' . .>; : .' . ". ....' .,".....,.; ,~i
:. I '~~1-- , '''" .." Ii-.. "__. '" ".c' ",., ,.. "" ",
-}I :, ((,.. \;"'.. .::;.., ,,'.' '0 '~'" ',' /"0, '.' ",c.
';: : I n J~' ~" , ~ ":~' _ '..,,".. ~d ,c : :c :".:' ,. '" .-::;(.)~~,~ ;,' ~..",.".,
.... ,I. 8 ~" ,,'f'T "" I..n". '" "'" , " ',...'./ . . 'YV~",c "'.f. '(,V'
.... Ii z ~'Vr ~~ ~. '""... ...... .1,X\/., /"(~J ;1',.':.--,
; \18 81 "" . 'c."!( , .. '.... ."'",...."'.., ..
' ~ '~( ~ ~ . '.<i: -. iI': ..'. . :,"' ft'" v':d:t>&' /,'')'; ; "". '~(".
.' ' 'I ~ · \ 'Os, '" {l,._ r l'" '!. ,'. . " > 'Y\>.~~X.~~ <.,;;.: '> /..~ (" /' '~:.., ;
I -\ . , .11 ~"" - '-'''.''-Uw;BJ' .I..:'\~~.: -:, "1.(,S-,W'/ "~,>, ,:-'>.
...... \ ""?~\ f-, .3..",r: "! ,.::. 'I L-:;)......; 1."-"....; /~,', "-/'" ,
- NCY.l '" 0' ~ .",. ,:. "" . ",' ", .. " ...
.- NO' 00 0'1 C) '" 0 ~ ~';.': 1 T'" _-;_:!~ ".
g? ll),~ W 1/ "\,'trJ @l( __,
DOHD:) ......;. \ S . A "',,,,,.0: 1(/.. _, " .. _,_
r1\h' tilJ~} ,_' ", _
\~ :
~l ~lltl( .-.t::lil.'~.
...... I ~.:\-.!""'-.~... l~tfJ~ c;;
.' : ~J, ~ ~ ,., ~
-f--'-
..--,
,--+-
,........t-
I lltl I
t ,:l S I
~
oj
::>a..
n.w
u
<t
-l
Il.m
~<;t
IcO
~(X)
O::<;t
m~
-lW
D_
O
~
\)
~
~
'l:
~
101..
'-
\" '-1--
I~' I
a-':'.l'
ci
U
~
l-
:J:
C>
1r
m
~Il 6
, 0 .
~ ;; 111
\~ ~ ~
'co
I'f)
,.:
I'f)
(f)
\<.
I,
~
~
I~
DEVEL..JPMENT SERVICES DEPARTME~ I
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 97- 577
FROM:
Larry Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Mike Haag, Building Division
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utility Dept. Chief Field Insp.
Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
John Wildner, Park Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Sebastian Puda, Engineering Division
7t<- ~L: 7~ ~\/
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning & Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
November 26, 1997
SUBJECT:
Land Use Amendment/Rezoning - 2nd Submittal
Project: First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
Location: Y4 Mile North of Intersection of S.W. 8th Street and
Woolbright Road, east side of S.W. 8th Avenue.
Ellen Smith
LUAR 97-002
Agent:
File No.:
Attached is the amended master plan modification submittal for the above referenced
project for your final review and recommendation. Please review the amended plans
and exhibits submittal to determine if the plans have been adjusted to satisfy the
comments previously made by your department.
If your comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of
building permit, please advise this office in writing. If your comments have not
been met, please indicate this in writing to my office.
Finally, include in your memorandum a recommendation as to whether the project
should be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for consideration. Please
return your memorandum and the amended plans (Building Division shall keep
their plans) to Planning and Zoning by 5:00 P.M. on Friday December 5,1997.
If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to call Jerzy
Lewicki at Extension 6260, who is coordinating the review of this project.
T JH:bme
Attachment
Page 2
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
File No. LUAR 97-002
cc: (Memo only)
Kerry Willis
Bulent Kastarlak
Charlie Frederick
Marshall Gage
John Guidry
William Bingham
AI Newbold
John Yeend
Central File
J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\First Baptist Church of BB\LUAR\2NDREVIEW-PLANS.doc
To:
Fax:
From:
Date:
Pages:
From the desk of...
Michael Rumpf
Senior Planner
City of Boynton Beach
I 00 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
561-375-6260
Fax: 561-375-6259
Ms. Ellen Smith
655-5525
Michael Rumpf
November 26, 1997
2, including cover sheet
I may be wrong but I thought that you may have
mentioned something about application fee just now when
we spoke. To be safe, I have faxed the page from our fee
schedule and marked the fee associated with the new
application you are preparing. As this is the same as was
required for the First Baptist Church application, you
likely have a clear understanding of the fees due for this
new application. If you have any questions or need any
further assistance do not hesitate to contact me.
,
".?i.,b'::= r\
fEBS POR LAND DBVBLOPMBNT RELATED ACT:ru:r:I:Il3.S
Page :
bCTIVITY
.E2
Abandonments (easement or right-of-way) **** . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 500
Annexations
Less than 5 acres
5 acres or more .
$ 750
$1,000
$ 200
$ 400
$ 100
$ 200
$ 100
Appeals & Waivers
Administrative .........
Community Design Plan
First appeal (per code section)
Each additional appeal ....
Landscape Code
First appeal (per code section)
Each additional appeal
Sullding and Construction Permits
1.6t of cost of improvements ($35 min.)
Conditional Use Approval *, ****
Less than 3 acres . .
3 acres or more . . . . .
$1,000
$1,500
Development ot Regional Impact (DRI) Review
New DRI and amendments to OR! Development Order
...
Environmental Review
Application
Permit
$
$
$
250
250
250
Height Exception
Land Development Permit
Land Use Amendment
Prior to DCA transmittal
Uo to 10 acres
More than 10 acres
For DCA transmittal .
1.6t of cost of improvements ($35 min.)
. . $ 750
Q1:-7Spl
. 50
Legal review of documents (such as cross-access
agreements and leased parking agraements)
. . . . . .'. . . . . $ 400
Master Plan
Master Plan Review (within a conventional zoning district)
Less than 20 acres .........
20 acres or more '. . . . . . . . . . .
Master Plan Modification (regardless of zoning)
$1,000
$l,SLiv
$ 500
Platting
Pre-aoolication process **
Plat review .. ....
$1,000
$3,000
Postoonement (un to 3 months)
Without re-advertisement and renotification
to property owners .......
With re-advertisement and with or without
renotification to property owners
...ol~Cl~n ~o .,s-.,. Ap~11 1.. 1'"
$ 25
.....
'11ie City of
r.Boynton ~eacli
100 'E. 'Bognton 'Beadi 'Bouf.evara
P.O. 'B(];(310
'Boynton 'Beacfi, ~foritfa 33425-0310
City:Jlaff: (561) 375-6000
~jlX: (561) 375-6090
November 21, 1997
The IP ARC Clearinghouse
9835 -16 Lake Worth Road, Suite 223
Lake Worth, FL 33467
RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
First Baptist Church Amendment and Rezoning (LUAR 97-002)
Attention: IP ARC Clearinghouse:
The City of Boynton Beach is processing an amendment to its Future Land Use Map. Please find
enclosed an executive summary and location map. The applicant is First Baptist Church of
Boynton Beach. They are removing the 14.18 acre tract from the approved PUD know as
Woolbright Place PUD. The land use is to be changed from Moderate Density Residential
(MODR) to Local Retail Commercial (LRC).
Public hearings on this proposed amendment will be held before the Planning and Development
Board on December 22, 1997 and before the City Commission on January 6, 1998; both at 7:00
P.M. in the Commission Chambers at City Hall, 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton
Beach, Florida.
Should you have any questions or need additional information, contact Dan DeCarlo, Planner at
375-6260.
Sincerely,
-/~ .~- '7Y!- ~
Tambri Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
TJH:mr
Enclosures
51~rU;a's (jateway to tfie quifstream
Page 1 of2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
DATE:
Reference #: LUAR 97-002
General Information
Initiating Local Government: Boynton Beach, FL
Contact Person: Dan DeCarlo, Assistant Planner
Address: 100 E Boynton Beach Ave. Boynton Rp.<!f'h, FT 134<5
Telephone/Fax: 561-375-6261 I 561-375-6259
Applicant! Agent: First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach/UnNh, Smith & Associates
T elephone/F ax: "\f.l R1"\ R"\O"\ I "\f. 1 f.'i'i <;<;?5
.
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Textual Amendments
General Summary of Amendments:
- amendments relating to traffic circulation or the roadway networks
- amendments relating to affordable housing
Amendments related to the following elements: I
- land use
- traffic circulation
- mass transit
- ports and aviation
- housing
- infrastructure sub-elements
- coastal management
conservatIon
-
- recreation and open space
- intergovernmental coordination
I - capital improvements
I other
-
I
! Summary of addition (5) to adopted comprehensive plan:
I
I ,I
I
I
1
~'"l' I
\
I
Page 2 of2
Summary of proposed change (s) to adopted comprehensive plan:
Proposed Amendments to the Future Land U~~ Map
Location of proposed map amendment (include a location map) t mile north of S.W. 8th Street
and Woolbright Avenue on the~~tside of S.W. 8th Avenue
Size of Area Proposed for Change (acres) 14.18 acres
Present Future Land Use Plan Designation (include a density/intensity definition) M~.~~!atB Densi.~I_
7.27 DU/AC (MODR) Residential
Proposed Future Land Use Designation (include a density/intensity definition) . Loca~ Retail
- -
Comin~rcial (LRC)
Present Zoning of Site (include a density/intensity definition) PUD
Proposed Zoning of Site (include a density/intensity definition) pr.n
Present Development of Site vacant
Proposed Development of the Site, if known (Number of Dwelling Units~ Commercial Square Footage~
Industrial Square Footage~ Other Proposed usage and intensity):
Is proposed change a Development of Regional Impact?
Comprehensive Plan Change Processing
DatelTimeILocation Scheduled for Local Planning Agency Public Hearing
December 22, 1997/7:00PM/Boynton Beach City Council Chambers
..
DatelTimeILocation Scheduled for Governing Body Public Hearing
January 6, 1998/7:00PM/Boynton Beach City Council Chambers
Scheduled Date for Transmittal to DCA
~
. ,
> ......
.......\...,\.."
.....~\'~"
. .\'~.1( ,
~".
:..(;r.~
..\' .
a
~~
o..-~
a _
~~
~~\ ~"" 'ic c6 0- ~
~'. . ,.. . ~ ,
~~~:l ~\ ~, \ / ,~,
.. ....~ \~~' Rr '., - ~ >[" '/ \-',<t! . .,\
ro. ' ~',,,,, .. ':. _",., c ....)\C. );(.
.!.. ~ .,; ':,t": i. '~.. ,?' "~'1~':'~:~~"~~-\~~\
'" ""'. '. . \\. · """,.~... -'-/ ,..'..,K~
,:-.k:l-~~"~\1,...." .. ',\,~ ~:;...."~\~~..~:~~/ /..~~.~~:x\
.... '\, ~,., V>: .....,."",)7, ~~A;i!N'> ~:
'. \ ", ~. . .' '~..".;i~ ~~: ,- 'r~J: ~h:l\. ~ ...:', ~~:-, ."\."~.. "')',"!-.' ~'-:G
'~-:-- ";. "t\~~';"~ .", .:, ~J:l': ~ ';"":;'. ;;m....-e~.:. "';}~: . '~-:<.~.;. ".: ~J:
~";" · :-"~." ~ . . ;, · :~JX'i;::l_'., ,....... , ..... : \.', :'.n
· ,.. II, · "':N-' . . " "'J, '.' . .." ,
\ '" J. .- ~l\- ' " . . " . ~ "\~ ' '. "". . ". '(' ~
"',,' " "'-~", . ",~. "" "'. .t>. ~" ,~ ~.':.
'\~"'~~"~".. - ~~.~ ~'..':. . -.:> ....~ I ;j~~~' r....rl.(,;r;;,,'. ~.:~'.,.:'}{r:': .:: -i~~~
'. ' ~~.,," ,.' ~..... . -' '. I~ (~o)\;" " ~ ~... .' ". e")
",~~~~,~,'J.~~ - ..~\;~~- 0 '~~. ~.\m"'Yrr . ..; ,~W v:'" ~'., "!. '",,~ .,~~. :', ..:.;-\~
- ., ,'. - " , . -. .'. . , ,J:;l.:.,t'." ~ ,;.. ""'OJ!\ '..., . ':j.,~ '\..
- . ~ . . . \'(:..\'1 " . f€; I 1'.., ..,... , ,,' 'IK ..
- ':/):',::.:.;, :..:~;.::-- .~; ... ~ ',,\! !9tAY'ii t:;'i~~' f;'@>,~ :~~ '.. ,-,,~~~,'.~ ~'. ,
'. . ll. _. ...., _ .~' ~ "- , ,= ' ,~~ . '. ,.. . '.. .
' . ", "'. · ". h ~ L f:;/.'; ~ "'" ... "
\ ~ . '", , .. ., .... "'ftj' ~ '., ~ . '..
. ..' ., , ." · . . ..... -:>ci: -. 1f;i9' ;; f:.~" .," ~ ". ~
' -.' ... .. .,".., ". '. , ~ ~ ... ~ ., '. ""'#. l'. \0 ~
. . ... -", - '. - , , . .. ;. '((..
". , . '-. - -' '. ',.-". <;J , .... ", ~, :
. , , '.. '..,.. .. "" "'. "'.=. ,,-, . . ~ f.' .'!..:j ~
'. · . - .... " '., " '~~)~""" '~"'1i:~~/.
' , . . .... ''''.. q.. . - '''' ~.. . "''' .. ..
' .... . " , .. .. "" '.. ~. ~ .. ", ,
. · '.~ "': .. · . .'.. , .- .. ., h '.7 '- " ". ..':J.t. _
',~ ".....~,' . '.:..... H. /I., -';1Aq~ ''''d ".
. ~".. " 0 \ " ,: .. ".. , . , .. ~ 1 ..~.' i):f ..... """ 'l~ ?;~;. ~~r~ ;.
.. .. ~""': ~'. ". " : - . ~. ~ "'. · ", tv. "'... ..... ~:'J5.. """
· ..... '. , .. 'M~. .-....rr_ q.:>,.y, l; '".. ,.
i ' ." · · ". " ,.... - (. ~_ ':'\'-:;_ .~.... Ul f.. .~D~?;--"" . t- .. N. '7~' , .
" '. . . . .- ~ ,..",~ . """'~~"""'~." ..' '.
., -\t '" ~\ ~'<!l ,'... ". ., V ~ ',. ;I ;;;.-~ T\.. "" ... ~ . .," ~fiJ,;,,: ~, 'c. (./ ' "
. . ....' .... ' "'"". .. ""~ " ..".. ~~ {!j '\. '. " . -~. .. r /
' '''., . ~ , · -po 11:., .. ~ .
"', ., c... .' '~_'. " ~ ",;.:_ .. ~ '., ".. . '.
" ~'" ," /. . . ~ ,. .. - .. .... J. ". '..'" ,.
'. - ... '" · .' -.. '.'. . - · ,.,. ~~1iI' I "~.J: ~;r.. .;(
.-., ]", ",.'... ",:,: .;" >;. · :~.~- 11,9' , ..'. ~2 ~~~' i'i ,.'''~':;')6~IlA'''' '. ~f ,;, ~
.' . - -" , . - "..'. ., '".~.. " . ,. . '.."
.. - . // -- ..,~ " ". '~..", - '~". S. . . _.
,.. .-/ ",';,V- J.l; .' l""l". l.Oof,~'" ~ \.. .."', .....~"" ... _~. r' 'c' "
~ "-:;'" .' - c':.", . ....".;4'. f' fllJ'.;.o. ...." '." I"j
O 0 ." -, L .. " . u." _. . .... '" ,
" · '.. /I . _. - ~ '"c _ ., . "'-. "
~,. ,." - - " I, , ...~_ ~'. -';' TI;, ;ll\\. "~.' ~, c-.;', ,~~ ':'
j ~~'i3. . ~ ~~ 'l... ~ Yell .1;"" ~ ...' \:!;l'I" 1_,1-.,
'tl;~'i'(; l.. ~ r.1l ~ "",!~11 , .~,' b'
"'~-' 1r.J . -. .. '~4
'1>'" , " ..."" ~ 'l\ '. .;~~\ . " 0:/
:.> . ','." ~'1 0 ( ..,.,~~ \-P.i~'>,,-
~ \ 1,' '3 '~ V 7;' ~ '
~ i \\ \ ").-..: ~. ~ 1,( ....>0 r:::.>
' , , 0 ,"- v- \
,j " , ~~-~...
' 0'0' m ~-....>'
· . oo~o':> ~ ~
fl" ~
:t.,.,
~\\
~
~
~
t
~ '~)
rz7ie City of
'Baynton 'Beach
.", 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beac1i 'Boulevard
P.O. 'B(T,(310
'BO!Jnton 'Beadi, ifforitfa 33425-0310
City 9iaff: (561) 375-6000
ifJllX: (561) 375-6090
'",
~--~
November 19, 1997
Ellen Smith
Unruh, Smith and Associates
105 S. Narcissus Avenue, Suite 503
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
RE: Initial Review Comments - First Baptist Church - PCD
File No. LUAR 97-002
Dear Ellen Smith:
The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the documents submitted
for the above-referenced project. Attached are comments made by the reviewing
departments during their initial review of your project.
In order to complete the review process, the master plan and documents must be
amended to comply with these comments within 90 days of the date of this letter. (If
amended plans are not submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.)
When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not applicable to the
approval of the project or will be addressed separately and you have not amended the
plans to comply with the comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each
comment stating why the comment is not applicable and return the explanation with the
amended plans and documents.
After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12) complete sets
(including surveys) of the plans to Planning and Zoning. When the amended plans and
dodJments have been submitted to Planning and Zoning, they will be distributed to the
reviewing departments for second review and recommendation to the appropriate
boards for approval or denial. A recommendation for deni~1 will be made if there are
major comments that have not been addressed on the resubmitted plans.
~muua 's gateway to tlU (julfstrtam
Page 2 of2
Initial Review Comments
First Baptist Church - PCD
File No. LUAR 97-002
Dates pertaining to the remainder of the review process are as follows:
. The amended plans will be due by 5:00 P.M. on November 25,1997.
. The request will be presented to the Planning and Development Board on December 22,
1997.
. The request will be forwarded to the City Commission as a development plan on January 6,
1998.
If you should have any questions regarding the comments or the approval schedule, please feel free
to call Jerzy Lewicki, who is coordinating the review of your site plan for Planning and Zoning.
Very truly yours,
f7,j_0: x-rf-Iv
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
T JH:bme
Atts.
S:\project\First Baptist Church\LUAR\1st rev. comment
,.
U \Yl rn
Board of Supervisors
C. Stanley Weaver
Kermit Dell
John I. Witworth III
Secretary/Manager
William G. Winters
Assistant Manager
Ronald L. Crone
Attorney
Perry & Schone, P.A.
~'88
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
ill
820S97
rn
13081 MILITARY TRAIL
DELRAV BEACH, FLORIDA 33484
November 18, 1997
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Director Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
PlANNING AND
1 NING DEPT
Dear Ms. Heyden:
Subject: Application for Land Use I Rezoning
Petition # LUAR - First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
LWDD# 91-1952D.01
The above referenced project is located within the boundaries of the Lake Worth Drainage District.
The Lake Worth Drainage District will accept storm water into its canals from any parcel of land
presently lying within its boundaries by due process. This does not mean that the District will provide
the means to take the water from a given parcel of land to one of our canals. It does mean that once the
runoff waters have reached our canal, we will accept that responsibility for them.
The District reserves the right to approve or disapprove all proposed connections to its canals. This
includes designed flows as well as construction methods. The runoff rate used must be subject to and
meet the criteria set forth and established by the South Florida Water Management District, which
agency has such authority under the Florida Water Resource Act of 1972 passed by the State Legislature.
The drainage design of this project must be reviewed by LWDD staff prior to any construction. Review
and approval by the LWDD is not meant to absolve this project from review by other agencies having
jurisdiction.
Sincerely,
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
J!:J;.t~
Chief Inspector
SJW: kjr
c: Patrick A. Martin, P.E., District Engineer, LWDD
luarltr
Delray Beach & Boca Raton (561) 498-5363. Boynton Beach & West Palm Beach (561) 737-3835 . Fax (561) 495-9694
lJ.~ City of
'Boynton 'Beach
100 'E. 'Bognton 'Beadi 'Boufevara
p.o. 'B(};(310
'Boynton 'Beadt, :[foriIfa 33425-0310
City 9faft (561) 375-6000
:[..9lX: (561) 375-6090
VIA FAX (561)655-5525
~
......-=-=---
November 12, 1997
Ms. Ellen Smith
Unruh, Smith, & Associates
105 Narcissus Avenue - Suite 503
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
RE: 1) First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach - Land Use Amendment and Rezoning (application status)
2) Woolbright Place PUD - Master Plan Modification (application status)
Dear Ms. Smith:
With respect to the status of the above-referenced application reviews, please be informed that item #1 above has
been accepted by this office, despite the deficiencies noted in my previous letter to you dated November 4, 1997,
and will be processed as follows: Technical Review Committee review on November 18th; Planning &
Development Board review on December 22nd , and City Commission review for transmittal to DCA on January
6th (please note that these dates are similar to those indicated in my previous letter with the exception of the
Planning & Development Board meeting date which was changed from December 23rd due to the Jewish holiday).
As for those deficiencies in this application, by November 17, 1997, please provide a certification statement for
the accuracy of the property owners list, as well as new signature pages which include the signatures of the
authorized agent and property owner on the correct lines. The application page is currently absent of the
necessary property owner signature, and includes on the line intended for the agent's signature, the signature of
an unidentified person (e.g. Dorothy S Vaughn). Also, if this individual is to be a representative of this project,
please provide proper authorization.
With respect to item #2 above, the master plan document is sufficient enough to begin processing; however, the
total application lacks the analysis of that data that is provided on the application approved when the master plan
was originally established. This data, namely project density, must also be reviewed when a master plan is
proposed to be amended, and also similar to when the master plan was first established, the density must not
exceed the maximum allowed by the city's comprehensive plan (or stipulated settlement agreement if applicable).
Please provide to this office those deficient elements described above for item #1, and the necessary data to
complete the application for a master plan modification no later than December 1, 1997. Please understand that
if you cannot indicate how the impact on density continues to comply with city regulations, staff cannot forward
this application to the Planning & Development Board and City Commission with a recommendation for
approval.
If you have any questions on this response, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
- '. /i
,/;;;:.- a.lu/} ., -. ' ,: (~'-- ..:: ,,-..'-
i/ "
Tambn J. Heyden, AICP
Planning & Zoning Director
TJH:mr
XC: Jim Cherof
Kerry Willis
S:IPlanningISHARED'.WP'PROJECTSIFirst Baptist Church of BBILUAR-REZNIElIenSmith2.doc
5tmuua's (jateway to tfie (juifstream
(~ City of
'Boynton ~eacli
100 'E. 'l3oynton 'l3e.adt 'l3oufevarti
p.o. 'l3~310
'Boynton 'l3eadi, j"forufa 33425-0310
City !J{afl: (561) 375-6000
j".9lX: (561) 375-6090
November 7, 1997
-___:;0..--
Mr. Dan Weisberg, Senior Engineer
Palm Beach County Traffic Division
Department of Engineering and Public Works
P.O. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416
Re: Traffic Studies: First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach, Inc. &
Woolbright Place PCD/PUD (Commercial Acreage Deletion)
Approximately one-quarter mile north of the intersection of Woolbright Road
and S.W. 8lh Avenue (west side of S.W. glh Avenue)
File # LUAR 97-002
Dear Mr. Weisberg:
Please find enclosed two (2) traffic studies dated September 29, 1997 and submitted in connection with
the above-referenced petitions, which includes an amendment to the master plan for the Woolbright
Place PUD, located approximately one-quarter mile north of the intersection of Woolbright Road and
S.W. gill Avenue (west side of S.W. 8lh Avenue). Please review the enclosed information for
conformance with Palm Beach County's Traffic Performance Standard Ordinance. I've also attached a
copy of the fax cover sheet I sent you August 21, 1997, regarding the latest traffic study, submitted for
this property and prepared by Maria Columbo, to which I would appreciate your comments.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please call Senior Planner Michael Rumpf at (561) 375-
6260, otherwise please send me your written comments/approval to the above address, with a copy of
your written response to Al Newbold, Acting Development Services Director, also at the same address.
Sincerely,
--
....
. (~~-'''' oS'
, .
, -, l_,..../ ~ I _/.
. ,.. .~-
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
Attachment
TJH:bme
cc: Al Newbold
w / attachment
Central File
')
s:\projects\First Baptist Church of Bo \traffic
jfmemas (jateway to tfie qui/stream
DEVEL~PMENT SERVICES DEPARTMEN I
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-541
TO: Kerry Willis, City Manager
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept. Chief Field Insp.
AI Newbold, Acting Director of Development
Sebastian Puda, Engineering Division
Larry Roberts, Public Works Director/City Engineer
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
John Yeend, Engineering Division
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning & Zoning Director
\ \ j. ~!
~~ ~:.:J'f:
~J
DATE:
November 6, 1997
RE:
LAND USE AMENDMENT/REZONING
Project - First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
Location - % mile north of the intersection of S.W. 8th Street and Woolbright
Road, on the east side of S.W. 8th Avenue
Agent - Ellen Smith
File No. - LUAR 97-002
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please
review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments to the Director of
Planning and Zoning no later than 5:00 P.M. on November 14, 1997. When preparing
your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code
sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project.
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable
the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter
3, Master Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to
review and formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete,
however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to
properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the
documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be
requested by the reviewer by contacting Jerzy Lewicki.
Page 2
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
TO: TRC Members
RE: Planning and Zoning Memo 97-541
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the
documents.
4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans
depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements
may conflict with other departmental improvements.
5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review
responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review
comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the
review specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within
the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director. The memorandum shall
state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans
submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the
approval process.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and
Zoning Division for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of
the reviewer on this memorandum. Jerzy Lewicki will be the Planning and Zoning staff member
coordinating the review of the project.
Planning and Zoning staff will send the applicant a cover letter which includes the comment(s)
and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for
resubmission. When Planning and Zoning staff receives the amended plans, we will distribute
the plans with a cover memorandum to all TRC Members for review and approval.
T JH:bme
Attachment
XC: (Memo Only)
William Bingham, Fire Chief
Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Marshall Gage, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Central File
s:lformslLUAR 1 streview-plans
Facsimile
TRANSMITTAL
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
P.O. BOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310
FAX: (561) 375-6259
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
to:
E \ \~" $ f"A \\" U~ {"'o..~ S ,{\ ,\..\... Cen6 Ass 0 C ~ q'\es
,
~ (0 l - ~5'S - 5 S' L. $'
fax #:
date:
s:
N O\.i'~.-v-.. '0 Qr )( \ q q l
re:
S-\:.o.:-\.s-c" 0' f,::~l Bc,p'\:.\<.,t C~J~c-l. ~Jb\'(\&o.\
~ ~J}') ,,~.. S ~CKJ. - Cls:-, J ' l><>. ( I S ~i "~
pages:
Z- ,including cover sheet.
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES,
PLEASE CALL 561/ 375-6260
Planning and Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
375-6260
Fax: 375-6259
rrFie City of
'Boynton 'Beach
( ,
. ,
'0"- ',u_/L f
''--. .'
!
I
/
100 'E. 13oynton 'Beadi 13oukvan{
P.O. 13G;t310
'Boynton 13eadi, :Fforitfa 33425-0310
City !J{a1f: (561) 375-6000
:FJlX: (561) 375-6090
Novem
, 997
Ms. Ellen Smith
Unruh, Smith, & Associates
105 Narcissus Avenue - Suite 503
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
RE: First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach- Land Use Amendment and Rezoning
Woolbright Place PUD - Master Plan Modification
Dear Ms. Smith:
Although this office has communicated with your staff by telephone the deficient elements from the above-referenced applications,
namely the master plan elements and the separate request for a master plan modification, I am writing to further document these
outstanding deficiencies as well as to inform you of the following two, minor application deficiencies: 1) the application page (agent
line) is endorsed by an unidentified person, and is not signed by the property owner; and 2) the property ownership list does not
include a certification statement. Of course the missing element with the greatest priority is the request for a master plan
modification. This application should technically be reviewed prior to the review of the new rezoning as the amendment, which
involves complex issues such as the impacts on maximum allowed densities, must be resolved/approved prior to the establishment
- a new master plan. Yes, we have agreed to process the applications concurrently; however, as the subject amendment
r Jtentially involves debatable issues, which may require the full review period to resolve, reductions in the review period must be
minimized.
As you know, all application documents must be submitted by the established deadline, which in this case was October 1, 1997.
This office has accepted application materials after established deadlines; however, in cases where incomplete applications were
completed after the posted deadline, this delay was occasionally permitted as long as the established review schedule was
unaffected. With respect to your application, since over 30 days have passed since the review process began, it may now be
difficult to maintain the review as originally scheduled. There is a second applicant of a large-scale amendment being processed
during this cycle, who has used the established review schedule to plan a future development schedule. Furthermore, according to
the requirements of FS 163, with respect to the processing of plan amendments, we must simultaneously process all proposed
amendments. If amendments are processed (transmitted) separately, they will count toward subsequent amendment cycles.
In order to still be considered for this current review cycle, you must submit all remaining elements (in a complete state) by
tomorrow, November 5, 1997. This will enable your projects to be reviewed by the Technical Review Committee on November
18th, the Planning & Development Board on December 23rd, 1997 and by the City Commission on January 6, 1998. You should
also know that amended plans (pursuant to comments generated by the TRC on November 18th) are to be submitted by November
25th. So there is no misunderstandings, we need confirmation, along with your application, that you will be able to meet these
submittal dates. If you are unable to meet this deadline of November 5th, the soonest your application can be accepted and
processed is on April 1, 1998. If you have any questions on this response, please contact Senior Planner Michael Rumpf at 375-
6260.
Sincerely,
~_w.~~
:nbri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning & Zoning Director
TJH:mr
J:\SHRDATAIPlanning'SHARED\WPIPROJECTSIFirst Baptist Church of BBILUAR-REZNIEllenSmithl.doc
51muua's (jateway to tfie (jutfstream
10-22-1997 1 :57P~
FROM UNP'~ SMITH ASSOC 407 655 5525
P.2
~~
.-
~ - ~~-~-
.J I' I! Ii II UNRUH. S.WTH & ASSOCIATFS
· I'ubiic Polley ;;nd Sl~lt:Sic Plonnin;
· land Use and Zoning Matters
· Lesislative Re$ulatol)' Aclion
· Govc:rnlT1ent Relations
· r>ri~';Jtjz:lt ion Issues
MEMORANDUM
TO: DanDeC~lO'
City ofBo
FM: Mark Ri ds I
DT: October 22, 1997
~..
RE: First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach, Tract F Woolbright Place Plat NO.1.
Our File II 137102~7.lII'l .
Thank you for discussing tbe referenced project with me yesterday afternoon. As I mentioned, it was
my understanding that while it was important to meet the deadline for the Land Use Amendment
application, the Master Plan application could follow at anyone of the deadlines within the next few
months. As it is my underStanding now that you wish to have the Master Plan application as soon as
possible, this memo is to outline my timeframe.
I bad originally plar.ned to submit the Master Plan application on October 2, but have been delayed
with some complications with my site planner. and drainage engineer. One of the issues was the
resolution oran issue regarding the:t 20' drainage easement which provided outfall for Woolbright
Place PUD. We are getting close to completion oftbe PCD master plan. but I felt we could not
submit yesterday, October 21, because of some further revisions requested by the property owner.
and the drainage engineer. I plan to submit witWn the next 10 working days. no later than November
~.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contaCt Ellen Smith or myself at (561)
~S~SOS. .
cc: Ellen Smith. AICP
IOS Smith N,lrcissus ,'\\'cn:l:': · Suite 503 · W.::>I P:111ll 8 (,.'O,h. F"brid:.l 3341)1 · 561.835-8505 · Fa\: 561.655.5525
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 97 - 431
f'O! l~ j__~-:__.'-..._ '".
W DEe I 7 1997 -:~
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
TO: Michael Rumpf, Planning Department
FROM: iV John A. Guidry. Utilities Directo~
DATE:
December 16, 1997
,./
SUBJECT: First Baptist Church, LUAR/Rezoning 97-002 (2nd response)
Woolbright Place PUD Land Use Amendment
In light of your department's memo no. 97-528, and your follow-up conversations
with my staff, we can state the following relative to the First Baptist Church Parcel:
1. Water and sewer utilities are located adjacent to the parcel in the S. W. 8th
Street right-of-way; and
2. Those facilities are adequately sized to meet the maximum demand allowed
by the proposed land use classification.
3. Treatment capacity in the water and sewer system currently exists to serve
the proposed demands of the project, which are anticipated to be as
follows:
Water demand
Sewer demand
Total demand
24707.3 gpd
24707.3 gpd
The overall density increase for the PUD is based upon the removal of the First
Baptist Church parcel. However, this department has already reserved capacity for
the entire PUD minus the Church parcel, and will therefore not experience any
additional demand due to the change in density. The net increase in demand,
therefore, is totally reflected in the above numbers.
JAG/PVM
xc: Peter Mazzella
Skip Milor
File
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
SUBJ:
DATE:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #97-305
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director, () ,
C. Larry Roberts, Public Works Director ()~V
Mark Lips, Sanitation Foreman MIX-
~:-::Il' ,- ~ m n
u ~ r--
dl
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
Land Use AmendmentJRezoning - 2nd Submittal- First Baptist Church
December 5, 1997
Public Works has no comments for Land Use, but we will require better access to
dumpster locations. Also drawing for dumpster enclosures on Master Plan.
ML/cr
t~:.1"
: ~:
rn
MEMORANDUM
Utilities # 97- 418
TO:
Tambri Heyden.
Planning & Zoning Director
-V
John A. Guidry, \
Director of Utilities ~
FROM:
Date:
December 8, 1997
SUBJECT:
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach,
Land Use Amendment/Zoning, Second Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments:
Utilities has no comment.
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
sm! Baptist3
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
97 -0074
- ':j ~ R ~ II \C
d U) ! ~
; in \ I
lulll . d
!,. l
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPl
rs i~',
L', j [; \
: I; i;
I Li "
UI
I
TO:
T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS ~
FROM:
RE:
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH of BOYNTON BEACH-LAND USE
AMENDMENT/REZONE _2ND SUBMITTAL
DATE:
DECEMBER 3, 1997
I have reviewed the above plans and have no comments/recommendations,
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. DD 97-323
~ ~ @ ~ ~ :~;-~ rn
TO:
T ambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Administrator
~NlNG AND
lONlNG DEPT.
FROM:
Al Newbold, Deputy Director of Development
DATE:
December 3, 1997
RE:
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BOYNTON BEACH-
LAND USE AMENDMENTIREZONING (LUAR 97-002)
2ND SUBMITTAL REVIEW COMMENTS
We recommend approval of the above referenced project subject to the following comments.
Buildin!!: Division (Site Specific Comments)
1. Add to the master plan and paving & drainage plan notes, symbols and dimensions that will
represent the location and width of at least one accessible route that is required from the
abutting public street to an accessible building and/or each tenant space entrance for all three
buildings. [Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.3, Accessible
Route]
2. Add to the master plan and paving & drainage plan notes, symbols and dimensions that will
represent the location and width of the accessible route that is required from the access aisles
located at each accessible parking space to an accessible building and/or each tenant space
entrance. [Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.6, Parking and
Passenger Loading Zones]
3. Place a note on the paving and drainage plan indicating that the site is designed in
compliance with the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction.
4. The master plan shows the footprint of the medical office building within the water
management easement and the footprint of the C.L.F. building within a FPL easement.
Relocate the buildings or extinguish the easements. Note the footprint of the nursing home
appears to abut the FPL easement. Building overhangs are not allowed within an easement.
En~neerin!!: Division (Site SDecific Comments)
1. Changing of Tract F from PUD to PCD requires platting in accordance with LDR Chapter 2,
Section 6.F.12.
2. Each facility shall have the appropriate number of handicap parking spaces per the latest
edition of the Florida Accessibility Code.
3. Show the total number of parking spaces provided under the "Parking Chart".
4. Under the "Notes" heading, add to the comment referencing re-routing the FPL power lines,
the following: All existing utility easements not needed shall be abandoned and all new
easements required shall be shown on the master plan and plat.
5. Obtain a 20 foot drainage easement for the drainage pipe from the lake across the Palm
Beach Leisureville property and relocate the existing 20 foot drainage easement within the
project to fall within the center of the existing 30" R.C.P.
Department of Development Memorandum No. DD 97-323
Re: First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach, Land Use AmendmentlRezoning, 2nd Submittal
December 3, 1997
Page #2
6. Provide a master storm water management plan outlining the primary and secondary drainage
and stormwater facilities needed for the development. [LDR Chapter 3, Article IV, Section
3.T.]
7. Provide a set of "typical" dimensions for the parking lot areas to show the parking stall
lengths and the minimum backup distance as specified in Standard Drawing B-90013.
MH/SP/KH:ck
Xc: Michael Haag
Sebastian Puda
Ken Hall
C:\My Documents\First Baptist Land Use Amendment-Rezoning 2nd.doc
Recreation & Park Department Memorandum
1 ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ,~'" ~ ~!
[,-. t ~l ~~
--'
I
PlANN\NG AND
lONING tlEPl.
To:
Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director
From:
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Re:
Is T BAfiTis1 c /lufCc.. t-I
):J/g/q7
I /
Date:
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the above listed plans. There are
currently no outstanding recreation-related issues. The plans may continue through the
normal review process.
JW
FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION
Memorandum No. 97-322
00 m@mn\Vlm 00
-... ... , '.~""--r
. " ~. ;-.~:j!
- -,
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
TO:
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning & Zoning Division
William D. Cavanaugh, Asst. Fire Marshal/fl;;f';11 /
Fire Rescue Department / t/f/\J(lA::1Yytf?t,v~J/ "'---
December 1 0, 1997
DATE:
SUBJ:
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
'X mile North of SW 8 St. & Woolbright Rd. intersection
LUAR 97-002
We have no objections at this time.
CC: Fire Marshal Gale
File
DEVE:....~PMENT SERVICES DEPARTME~ I
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97- 558
FROM:
~~1
\~>; .~~.~.
o.!'J /~
Rezoning Master Plan - 1st Review ~n~1f
Project: First Baptist Church - PCD ~ JV
Location: Northeast corner of Industrial Way and SW 8th Street
File No.: MPMD 97-006
November 14, 1997
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
Jerzy Lewicki -----1) ___/
Senior Planner "--.l~
DATE:
SUBJECT:
The following is a list of 1 st review comments regarding the modification of the master plan
review of the plans for the above-referenced project.
MASTER PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. On the master plan, provide information regarding the availability of utilities for the proposed
complex (LOR, Chapter 3, Art. IV. Sec. 3.P)
2. In order to conform to landscape regulations, reduce the spacing of trees within the
proposed landscape buffer from 50 feet to 40 feet.
3. Indicate the proposed number of stories and proposed floor areas for all buildings proposed
on the site.
4. It is recommended that the landscape buffer along SW 8th Street be coordinated with and
resemble the design of the Cracker Barrel buffer with respect to the proposed species, their
spacing and configuration.
5. On the master plan, provide required perimeter setbacks for the site in conformance with
the zoning regulations.
6. With the second submittal, provide more specific information regarding the proposed office
use.
7. Provide a unity of control document as required by the LOR.
xc: Central File
JL
J:\SHRDA TA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\First Baptist Church of BB\MPMD\mod-master-plan-1 st-rev-comments-1 st
baptist PCD.doc
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 97 - 380
rDJ ~@~O\Ylrnrn1
uniT · ~ I~
DATE:
Daniel DeCarlo, Planning Department
John A. Guidry, Utilities Directo~
November 14, 1997
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT: First Baptist Church, LUAR/Rezoning 97-002
In reply to your memo dated November 6, 1997, we can state the following:
1. Water and sewer utilities are located adjacent to the parcel in the S.W.
8th Street right-of-way; and
2. Those facilities are adequately sized to meet the maximum demand
allowed by the proposed land use classification.
I trust this letter meets your needs. Please refer any additional questions on this
matter to Peter Mazzella of this office.
JAG/PVM
xc: Skip Milor
File
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-528
FROM:
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to the Director of Utilities
D . I D C I )Y;J1j/rw'lt./'
ame e aro .
TO:
DATE:
November 6, 1997
RE:
First Baptist Church - LUAR/Rezoning 97-002
This office is processing the above application for a land use amendment and rezoning.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Department of Community Affairs for
compliance review, I am requesting that you provide me with specific information on the
current availability of facilities that would serve the subject property and a statement
indicating that there are adequate urban services available to serve the maximum demand
as would be allowed by the proposed land use classification.
To assist you with your review, I have enclosed a location map and application which
includes data on changes in potable water and sanitary sewer demands. I hope that given
the size of the subject property, you are able to provide a specific statement which
indicates that this application would have no negative impact on service availability.
The state has a specific time frame within which this information must be transmitted to
them. Therefore, your response would be greatly appreciated at your earliest convenience.
If you have any questions, please call me at (407) 375-6260. Thank you.
Attachments
S:\projects\First Baptist Church of BB\utilityc
" .. '.''.
. ~I'"
. .~,q\"'"
.,,~,I"~'
,....."..
~~~,
~ .-
l.!) ~
~ ~r
~ ~
\,\ <6 ---:
_r .n
'~ '?' ..e-
~ '0
\-
~,\ ; \ ;. ~
~
~ ~
';i '" ."
,... ..J ~ '1i, ~
' ~: l' '%.\ ~ t \\ .~\'..
"'~'.. " ;:: ~ >~~
" "."l. \\ >:- ~ ? ,
-, - -- ~ ~
. ' ~'... . <J?- '" ,
t, ' ' . .. ,,~, '0\ ~o\ .. '- ./
~. .c. · ',"" /. i<l
'l.' ". \- ~ ~ 'i.~' . ~/_. /~ ... "
' t _ '. , .' \"~'" .. .. _ '....' , ~ _, \ .
~~' ',\\' f< '--~- ., ';-,t--[' ,)." . .
'i"~N~ ;;:;'.<.~~".. ~.~~ ' ~ ,.~~,;i ~. ,~:-;"i. "y ~";~? '};:'''~' :". '
' ',' 'yClli , ' ...' "~' ,.y ,ON /' ,/./ " ls: .:t~io.z...: ~~~..) . ~ '
"'. , .' ~. .-.. '" '.;/ . oS' -,'''' ~" _., '-/.. . .
~ '. ~ ~ . "'" . ""-"Y ">.. \. ,
'" ". " ,. ,'",' ',il.~;~ " ""'-"" ,,"\'../. ~ . ':'<"C"', '. .
:"'....- \ ..:. -, ..' 'B ~~. ~~, ~-"\"~"'~r;~~l'~ // ~ ....:.:..~.', ~~''-v ",: ~ -" 0"1-
...-' ..", - .... ,.. . r... . ~\. rl'll ~...... (' ~ ~ 4,
'.' >- · ~1.. , ",- " '", ".. /, .......;;:51 "'" . '" " . .-
.~~''!\. ~': '~~~\l\\.{> \ - ...~~ 1l;,..... ;..~-" . "',':-'> . ..-.', ~~""'''''''' /A 'f': A~t.\.~~:.~\....,.,\ .... .,... ,,:'..._
:.tl6~ "...... \~~ ~ ~. ". -' . ]" '", '('1"" , . .
\ ~'" ,';.-~ \ ~~ 'l'.. $ . - -- ~- ~ .. ~\~ ~S ''''''!J ' ~.,." i!<'--'.'\' ~ -.. '.. . '.. 7
\ n.- . \'" "'",.....-'" _. . ',. , ' . , "~" , . .
~ ~~io '.' ,. 't:.~~~~. w. ...;.\ - ~ '" .~. 4' .;. ~.""~- ..,' ~.. ft. ~>-t~,\.: " ".l "'.._
'.... -" "'.:" .' ~ .\~.. L '-"" .' . . " "., ( . V~. ~ .~~-.f;f '. ~'. ~ '.',
'. ~t\._ "~~~~ ~ .c;rv . -::<' '! ~~_\ dO', ~ '''':;>/')... . ., _ "::K r. ..', '
'~~~l~g*1-~~~~. t::......, " '."-"':..":;;; I~. , ."'.....; ~:"~..~ ".',;'\~
~. > >..~...\.~ .. -\~-,;' 9 Co\:. '-$ rn~~ ~ ..n.".. '. ~l ~I \~.;.~. .::-,., ",. ;., ""'*. ~
- , ">Y.f",~ · \ ". Kt,\, , ~ ~ '..... "'" I r.... u ~. - !f;;l~ .,~ JU "'l rx ~
'-.~~ ~\)~. ~ ~\-'(':l,'"."" I,n '. , '~ ,
' "';:'" ,~, "".~' · "'.. ,UI",,~ "'\'. "..~ l~-;- .. , ~.~ ~ 'f;J .'
'- , ~ ", -" '., , I · .. . · '0-- . .
;\ ' '. ... "" ,-. , ,'~'.., .. ".;, ". 't;'~;cit)""~ /; .,," <;. ~ , ~
. . -It ..' .', X. - '..\ · . _ -"'. :. "" r' , , . _' '.,... ~ " .! ...
' . · , · . .... . -;." '. '" '. ",. .', ..: 'f' , , . ,n ."
, . .,' ". - -', '. C. " . #:..~ 1/",,,",. ,. '~ .
'... '" - ~' '. '''-'''1 "'.... r'-" f"' __ ~
. · -. " · '. · -,. -1..... - ... /J ":7";:0 .,.~ " '......1.' ~
...~;..,.."...:,'\<....:-~ .~4:... .. :~~"~'i "",". Ik?~~~ri~--~...fi-;:~~'Wt.~~~_. ,(~
' . ,;...". .' '. -'.' . . · . . '- If'j M.. ~.' r:, \ --"""'.'d} ~ '~m;. .~~
.. ,~'" ':. · ~ '. '" !--'::..... ,f:ii ''''''JI..>$ 'I !t<. "... .~~ " "
:~ ":', \. .. ~ --" <..::.. ~_.~-='" ~ ~~'~~L:;-~,.~"..... ~~:.~.~~ '. .
' , V\.. . ..' -"" "( ,,'~ , lW, ',}""~' ~.'<(, "
.,.. . \v '.....~, "1";;;;- ;;;.-~.-<#" _ J' .:~~~~ '\.. .... ~~ <t .,. ~"".~''''''I'::'' (.",
... ~ -~ nt'. -;..-.. II> '.,,'" .,.- .. J"" . _"., ,
.. - ~ \.J' ". ~=.:. .:.r~n,.. . .""", =t... ~ _ ' '.
. · . " ~." ....:: ~ . A.. I~ 1.. .. -,~., . '} .S<"",",; '. " " .... _. ~ S'J
~ .. ., /..q -.. '~'.'. . ~~. ~ '?; .:-..v ;
. " . , , /~',. . .. --" "-- '. ..,.....~~ .. -",'
.. . ",. - -,- ~. -- . '. "P.T..' " ,
'" · ", . /~::<. ':....: ".!'.. '" "\~ ~y,.-i;'- .".. , .,
','.:." . // \\ ~ ' .. "l~H~~~'~' . ~ ~;'t<" '.. r: ",~ . ',::
~",'lI ~;,:~:."" "./1' ~ \ '''~\''.'.,),'';.;~'' d'(~ ~\.~ ,'.~.~,) .. <"I.: .
r '~~ - ~'/I~ \t"'~\... . ~ ., "', -\~,~ .,,~..~_ '\' ,t=-::..
' w...'~~1,) , ~ ~~w;, .." .. "'\;'...~'"'" \~. '.' >.'" ',..
"'.,,~" " ,(i " ~~ "'"~ ' .. ~ ~
t~ ., · ~ ~~_. 0l;i!~~'S,.. .;. ,.5.Si
~ -', "','. '; ~( ~'~~ \;-~~@I,,/~
~ " \1 ~~ U c~ ,,~...
-: " \\ \ ~ ~ ~ II ~ .
,) - f J~ 0 >~~~~~.((l,. ->0 '
. <b tn . ~-::- ..._
",t, ,~~ ~ ~}/
oQ~O'"
\.
FIRST h~J>TIST CHURCH OF BOYN1. IN BEACH
TRACT-F WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PLAT NO 1
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING APPLICATION
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
LOCATION:
.-\pproximately 1/4 mile North of the intersection of S.\\'. 8th Street and \\loolbright _-\\enue, on the
East side of S.\'\'. 8th Ayenue, directly north of the Cracker Barrel restaurant. The 1-U8 :lcre vacant
parcel, Tract "F' in the \"'\'oolbright Place Pbt Ko. 1, is currently a portion of the \",\'oolbright Place
PUD, designated for use as a church site.
CURRENT STATUS:
The current Land Use is ;\foderate Density 7.26 DU / A.C, (.MODR), Vv-ith a zoning design:ltion of
PlJD. _;\$ a part of \\Toolbright Place PIJD, the property was a part of a settlement agreement \V-ith the
City of Boynton Be:lch. The appro\ed traffic report has vested the site with 750 trips, and a twenty
(20) foot drainage easement lies in the Korthwest comer of the site, providing outt31l from the
Stormwater ~lanagement Tract ,"vhich services the \\'oolbright Place PLU. The mvner of the parcel is
the First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach.
PROPOSAL:
The purpose of this application is to remove the 14.18 acre tract from the approved PlU known as
\\Toolbright Place PUD, and redesignate the land use from .MODR to GC, General Commercial.
Concurrently, a rezoning from PUD to Planned Commercial Development (FCD) is requested.
Additionally, a Master Plan Application for the proposed PCD, as well as a revised master plan for the
proposed modification boundary of \"'\'0 olbright Place PUU will be filed.
On November 21,1986, the First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach closed on a 14.18 acre parcel of
land known as Tract "F' of Woolbright Place Plat No.1, purchasing it from Howard R. Scharlin, as
trustee of Woolbright Place PLi), as seen in the attached \\Tarranty Deed (ORB 5083 PG. 10~). In
the accompanying Declaration of Restrictive covenants, recorded in ORB 5591, PG. 830, Paragraph 2,
Imposition ojRestrictions, various uses were prohibited, including the sale of alcoholic be\erages, tobacco
stores, bars, drive in restauI'3!lts, and automobile service stations.
This declaration was in place to protect the First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach, ,vho had plans to
construct a new church building on the property. The uses described in the restrictive covenant were
considered indispensable to the desired atmosphere and environment for the proposed church.
.iller the closing on the property, the outlined restrictions were not adhered to, and :l service station,
were approved and built. These ,-iolations have rendered this site undesirable for development as a
community church site, and the property owner is seeking to market and sell the property in the most
advantageous way. A commercial land use, with a Health Care Campus is seen as the best option to
achie,-e this goal.
FIRST B~_.rrIST CHURCH OF BOYN1 '-IN BEACH
TRACT-F WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PLAT NO 1
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING APPLICATION
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
page two
The property's proposed land used designation, GC, and accompanying zoning designation ofPCD
are suitable for the particular parcel for a number of reasons. The property has 1260 feet of frontage
on S.W. 8th Street, and is just north of the Woolbright Place PUD. The site is strategic:illy located near
major east-west and north-south arterials. The intersection of S.,'\-'. 8m Street and Woolbright Road is
approximately 700 feet south of the site. The Interstate 95/Woolbright Place interchange is
approximately 100 feet East of the S.\V. 8m Street / Woolbright Road intersection. A :Master Plan
application will be filed with the City of Boynton Beach which outlines a Planned Commercial
Development, with a mi.'\{ of an .Assisted Care Living Facility, Nursing Home Facility, and Medical
Offices. Directly across the E-3 Canal to the west of the site is a residential retirement community
known as Liesureville. This site will service the needs of the community, and prov;de e.....cellent access
for emergency vehicles to 1-95.
From a land use perspective, this modification will provide an excellent transitional buffer from the
residential development to the west (Liesureville), the residential PUD to the northeast (Trammel
Crow), and the Woolbright Place PCD to the south, which included Cracker Barrel, a gas station, and
Home Depot. Liesureville has a view today of the back door of the Cracker Barrel restaurant, which
includes the dumpsters, and open kitchen area. The existing one hundred fifty (150) foot E-3 canal is
an existing buffer between Liesureville and the proposed peD. Additional site design elements will be
incorporated into the site plan to further minimize any possible impacts, such as visual, landscape, and
sound buffering, creating an intermediate use which develops the property in a compatible, unified
design.
FIRST ~_:JlTIST CHURCH OF BOYN".l IN BEACH
TRACT-F WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PLAT NO 1
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING APPLICATION
ILLUSTRATION OF THE WATER DE~fAND AND SEWAGE
FLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT CNDER TIIE PROPOSED
ZONING IN CONTRAST WIlli DE~'1AND UNDER THE
CURRENT ZONING. WATER DE:NfAND AND SEWAGE FLOW
IS ESTHvlATED USING THE STANDARDS ADOPTED BY THE
PAL~1 BEACH COUNTY HEALTH DEP.ARTMENT.
CURRENT PROJECTED CHANGE +
WATER DEMAND 30,962 GAL/DAY 24,707.3 GAL/DAY - 6260.7 GALIDA Y
SEWER DEMAND 23,016 GAL/DAY 24,707.3 GAL/DAY + 1691.3 GALIDAY
METHODOLOGY:
EXISTING:
L-\ND USE DESIGNATION: MODERATE DENSITY 7.26 DU / AC (MODR)
DENSITY PER SETTLEi\-ffi'JT AGREEMENT = 8.08 DU / AC
AVER.!\GE POPULATION PER UNIT: 2.39 PERSONS/UNIT
MAXL.\JUM UNITS ON 14.18 AC SITE PER SETTLEME.:'JT AGREEMENT: 115 UNITS.
POPUL\TION C\LCUL-\TION (14.18 ACRES X 8.08 DL"/AC X 2.39): 274 PERSONS
POTABLE WATER DEMA~TD (274 X 113 GAL/CAP /D_\Y): 30,962 GAL/CAP/DAY
SANITARY SE\'\'ER D&vL-\i\JD (274 X 84/GALICAP IDA\j: 23,016 GAL/CAP/DAY
PROPOSED:
L\ND USE DESIGNATION:
J\Li\..XIMUM TOTAL FLOOR AREA:
}'1A..XL.\-n;~! SQUARE FOOTAGE (14.18 AC X 43560 S.F. X 40%)
POTABLE WATER D&\1A.:.'\:D (247,073 S.F. X 1/10 GAL/S.F):
S.AJ.'\:ITARY SE\'\'ER DE:.y1A.J.~rn (247,073 S.F. X 1/10 GAL/S.F):
GENERAL COMMERCIAL(GC)
40%
247,073 S. F.
24,707.3 GAL/CAP/DAY
24,707.3 GAL/CAP/DAY
C:\LCUL\TIONS BASED ON CHAPTER 10.D.6 FLOW RATES
FIRST h_.rTIST CHURCH OF BOYN~~N BEACH
TRACT -F WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PLAT NO 1
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING APPLICATION
A COMPARISON OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED IMPACTS
CREATED BY DEVELOPMENT
1. POTEL"'JTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE, TIllE OF D~'ELLING UNITS .AJ."JD
PROPOSED P01ENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE, TYPE OF DEVE.LOprvI&"JT
D Ei."J SITY
(DWELLING
UNITS/ACRE)
CURRENT LAl\;TI 7.26
USE (.MODR)
MA..~. FLOOR
AREA RATIO
(FAR)
N/A
USES ALLO\'\T.D
PROPOSED LAND N/ A
USE (GO
40%
. Single-Family dwellings
· Two-Family dwellings or duplexes
· Multiple-Family dwellings,
townhouses, garden apartments and
cluster housing;
· Private, nonprofit clubs, community
centers, CIVIC and social
organization facilities;
. Private parks, tennis courts,
playgrounds, putting greens, golf
courses, driving ranges and other
recreation facilities;
. Public utility buildings, strucnu::es,
and facilities necessary to service the
surrounding neighborhood;
· Houses of worship, schools, nursing
homes, nursety schools,
kindergartens and hospitals;
· "Neighborhood" commercial uses
which are determined at the time of
zoning to PUD, to be compatible
with the existing and future
development of adjacent and nearby
lands outside the PUD;
. Other uses of a nature similar to
those listed, after determination and
recommendation by the planning
and development board, a
determination by the govemmg
body at the time of zoning that the
use or uses are appropriate to the
PUD development;
. Permitted uses for a PUD District
shall be specified in the application
for zorung of land to PUD
classification;
(please see attached exhibit "A")
FIRST l ~TIST CHURCH OF BOYN'"1. IN BEACH
TRACT-F WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PLAT NO 1
LAND USE AM:ENDMENT AND REZONING APPLICATION
2. USES ALLO""ED IN PROPOSED ZO~:NG:
Please see attached Exhibit "A"
USES R"XCLUDED LN PROPOSED ZONING:
Please see attached Exlubit "A"
3. Th\1ING A.~D PHASING OF DEVELOPi\1E.""T
The project will reach buildout in the year 2000.
4. EivIPLOYEE PROJECTIONS
EXISTING CALC[ TIATION
(14.18 ACRES X 8.08 DUlAC X 2.39): 274 PERSONS
PROPOSED EMPLOYEE PROIECITONS
(2 E,."YfPLOYEES PER BEDS-nO + 1 ~\.1P PER 1000 S.F. = ABOUT 300 EMPLOYEES
5. TRAFFIC CO:MP ARISON
The nature of Traffic generation rates makes it difficult to compare traffic generation in a
general way, as each use has a different trip rate associated with it. It is accurate to say that
commercial traffic generation rates are higher than residential rates. The attached Traffic
Report was conducted based on the planned deyelopment as a Health Care Campus. A
residential development has a general traffic generation rate of 10 trips per day per unit.
The current site is vested with 750 trips under the current approval. The proposed trip
generation rate is 2747. With the current vesting, the new trips associated with this project
'with be 1997 trips, as seen below
Approval
Woolbright Place PUD, Church Parcel
First Baptist Church PCD
New Trips (Net Change)
6. WATER DE1.\.fAJ.",-,TI
Traffic Generation (Trips per Day)
750
2,747
1,997
CURRENT PROJECTED CHANGE +
WATER DEMAND 30,962 GAL/DAY 24,707.3 G.AL/DAY - 6260.7 GALlDA Y
7. SEWER DE...1vLi\...1\JD
CURRENT PROJECTED CHANGE +
SEWER DEMAND 23,016 GAL/DAY 24,707.3 GAL/DAY + 1691.3 GALlDAY
FIRST h_.PTIST CHURCH OF BOYN~0N BEACH
TRACT-F WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PLAT NO 1
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING APPUCATION
8. POPULATION PROJECTION UNDER CUR.REJ."JT ZONING/LAND USE AND
WIlli PROPOSED CHANGE:
EXISTING CALCULATION
(14.18 ACRES X 8.08 DUlAC X 2.39):
PROPOSED POPULATION PROJECTIONS
(300 EMPLOYEES + RESIDENTS)
CHANGE
274 PERSONS
420 PERSONS
+ 146 PERSONS (+52%)
11. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR PLM-..'NED ZONING DISTRICTS SPECIFIC
REGULATIONS:
The proposed project meets or e."{ceeds the specific design criteria for planned commercial
developments as follows:
Desi Criteria
Minimum land area of 3 contiguous acres
Off-street loading shall have one bay for each
twenty-five thousand (25,000) square feet of
gross floor area or fraction thereof, screened
from view.
Lot Coverage not to e.""tceed fotty (40) percent.
Open Lot Areas shall have adequate grading
and drainage, continuously maintained in a
dust-free condition, subject to the approval of
the community appearance board.
Setbacks shall be as follows:
Front yard: 40 feet
Side yard: 30 feet
Rear yard: 40 feet
Peripheral greenbelt with a minimum width of
ten (10) feet, except when abutting residential
districts, when it shall be twen five 25 feet.
Pro osed Develo ment
14.18 contiguous acres
At the time of the master plan and site plan
application, this regulation will be met.
The proposed PCD will not exceed forty (40)
percent.
At the time of the master plan and site plan
application, this regulation will be met.
At the time of the master plan and site plan
application, this regulation will be met.
At the time of the master plan and site plan
application, this regulation will be met.
DEVEL0f""MENT SERVICES DEPARTMENt
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97- 558
TO: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Jerzy Lewicki
Senior Planner
~
I
~
./
DATE: November 14, 1997
SUBJECT: Rezoning Master Plan - 1st Review
Project: First Baptist Church - PCD
Location: Northeast corner of Industrial Way and SW 8th Street
File No.: LUAR 97-002
The following is a list of 1 st review comments regarding the modification of the master plan
review of the plans for the above-referenced project.
MASTER PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. The submitted traffic study has to be evaluated by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division
for compliance with the adopted traffic performance standards. (LDR, Chapter 3, Art. IV.
Sec. 3.S)
2. On the master plan provide information regarding the availability of utilities for the proposed
complex (LDR, Chapter 3, Art. IV. Sec. 3.P)
3. In order to conform to landscape regulations. reduce the spacing of trees within the
proposed landscape buffer from 50 feet to 40 feet.
4. Indicate the proposed number of stories and proposed floor areas for all buildings proposed
on the site.
5. It is recommended that the landscape buffer along SW 8th Street will be coordinated with the
design of the Cracker Barrel buffer in respect to the proposed species, their spacing and
configuration.
6. On the master plan provide required perimeter setbacks for the site in conformance with the
zoning regulations.
7. With the second submittal provide more specific information regarding the proposed office
use.
8. Provide a unity of control document as required by the LDR.
xc: Central File
JL
J:\SHRDA T A \Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\First Baptist Church of BB\LUAR\mod-master-plan-1 st-rev-comments-1 st baptist
PCD.doc
-" r:I @rnow~ 00
:"J
'-~
ii'
POLICE DEPARTMENT ~ul
MEMORANDUM
PLANNING AND
97-0067 ZONING DEPt
RE:
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH BOYNTON BEACH-LAND USE ~
AMENDMENT/REZONING
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
NOVEMBER 7,1997
I have reviewed the above plans and have no comments/recommendations.
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM
TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Kevin John Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist
Re:
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
Land Use Amendment I Rezoning
DATE:
November 13, 1997
~~7f
Site Snecific Requirements
There are no comments on the above land use / rezoning plans.
The project should continue in the normal review process.
Kjh
File
~Gn0~11\l7~
r \ L': ~ [; U ~
, ."'~
: ,
.\1
.,-
m\
-- .
l
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-300
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
I
~
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Administrator
AI Newbold, Deputy Director of Development ~
FROM:
DATE:
November 13, 1997
SUBJECT:
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BOYNTON BEACH -
LAND USE AMENDMENT/REZONING (LUAR 97-002)
1st SUBMITTAL REVIEW COMMENTS
We have reviewed the subject plans and offer the following comments that should be addressed
prior to the project being forwarded for Board review:
Buildin!! Division (Site SDecific Comments) Michael E. Haag (561) 375-6350
1. Add to the master plan and preliminary drainage plan notes, symbols and dimensions that
will represent the location and width of at least one accessible route that is required from the
abutting public street to an accessible building and/or tenant space entrance for all three (3)
buildings. [Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.3 Accessible
Route]
2. Add to the master and preliminary drainage plan notes, symbols and dimensions that will
represent the location and width of the accessible route that is required from the access
aisle(s) located at each accessible parking space to an accessible building and/or tenant space
entrance for all three (3) buildings. [Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction,
Section 4.6 Parking and Passenger Loading Zones]
3. Place a note on the master plan and preliminary drainage plan indicating that the site is
designed in compliance with the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction.
En2:ineerin2: Division (Site SDecific Comments) Sebastian Puda & Ken Hall (561) 375-6280
1. Master plan sheet MP-l needs to be signed and sealed by design professional.
2. Conflict exists between overhead wires and proposed buildings and parking lots (poles and
guy anchors). Show proposed changes to eliminate conflicts. [LDR, Chap. 3, Art. IV, Sec.
3,0]
3. Plans show southern entrance to property to be 70 feet wide. LDR, Chap. 23, Art. II, H,1
states that the maximum width of any drive at the right-of-way line shall be 32 feet. Obtain
Director of Development approval for wider drive.
4. Changing of Tract F from PUD to PCD requires platting in accordance with LDR, Chap. 2,
Sec. 6,F, 12. . I I
\.1. \ \ \ J, Cj 1
MEH/SP/KH:bg {) ~ f~
xc: Michael E. Haag, Sebastian Puda, Ken Hall
\\CH\M..<\IN\SHRDAT A\Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\First Baptist Land Use Amendment-Rezoning.doc
OO~@~U~!WI
FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION
Memorandum No. 97-315
TO: Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning & Zoning Division
FROM:
William Cavanaugh, Asst. Fire Marshal
Fire-Rescue Department
DATE: November 17, 1997
SUBJ: First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
North of SW 8 St. and Woolbright Rd.
LUAR 97-002
We have no objections at this time.
CC: Deputy Chief Gale
File
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
;f)J{ ~~
-
ill m @ U W ffiOO'
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #97-287
THRU:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Dir~ct~
C. Larry Roberts, Public Works Director L!fl
TO:
FROM:
Mark Lips, Sanitation Foreman
SUBJ:
Land Use AmendmentlRezoning - First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
DATE:
November 18, 1997
The Public Works Department has no comments at this time reference the Land Use
AmendmentlRezoning for the First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach.
.----I /. Ii J'
/J/~. C( '*YJ
Mark Lips
Sanitation Foreman
MLlcr
ill ~ @ rn n Wi ~ [
. .-- , ~-
i :J\ - .... ~:~ ~
~ ,- ..-.-
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-517
TO:
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planing and Zoning Director
):1
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent i vv
1Sl Baptist Church Masterplan Revi Ion / Rezoning Request
RE:
Date:
November 19, 1997
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the plans for the 151 Baptist Church
Masterplan Revision and Rezoning Request. There are no recreation-related issues
on either of these matters. We recommend that these plans proceed through the
normal review process.
JW
MEMORANDUM
Utilities # 97.387
FROM:
Tambri Heyden.
Planning & zoninrvir~ctor
John A. Guidry,
Director of Utiliti
November 18, 1997
d;' t ~J'J/''''
-----_- . '(_-/~ryr::
----- ~---~--
TO:
Date:
SUBJECT: Fint Baptist Chur~h of Boynton Beach,
Land use Amendmcnt/Re-zonin&
Statfhas reviewed the above reteren.ced project and ofier the following comments:
Utilities ha:s no comment.
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through th~ review process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Maz~l1a at 375-6404.
sml Baptistl
xc; Clyde "Skip" MilOT
Peter Ma:r.:t.ella
File
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 97 - 380
oo~
rn 0 \Yl rn rD1
NOVIA. ~
DATE:
Daniel DeCarlo, Planning Department
John A. Guidry, Utilities DirectoW
November 14, 1997
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT: First Baptist Church, LUAR/Rezoning 97-002
In reply to your memo dated November 6, 1997, we can state the following:
1. Water and sewer utilities are located adjacent to the parcel in the S.W.
8th Street right-of-way; and
2. Those facilities are adequately sized to meet the maximum demand
allowed by the proposed land use classification.
I trust this letter meets your needs. Please refer any additional questions on this
matter to Peter Mazzella of this office.
JAG/PVM
xc: Skip Milor
File
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-528
FROM:
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to the Director of Utilities
Daniel DeCarlo j)/Jf.~~
TO:
DATE:
November 6, 1997
RE:
First Baptist Church - LUAR/Rezoning 97-002
This office is processing the above application for a land use amendment and rezoning.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Department of Community Affairs for
compliance review, I am requesting that you provide me with specific information on the
current availability of facilities that would serve the subject property and a statement
indicating that there are adequate urban services available to serve the maximum demand
as would be allowed by the proposed land use classification.
To assist you with your review, I have enclosed a location map and application which
includes data on changes in potable water and sanitary sewer demands. I hope that given
the size of the subject property, you are able to provide a specific statement which
indicates that this application would have no negative impact on service availability.
The state has a specific time frame within which this information must be transmitted to
them. Therefore, your response would be greatly appreciated at your earliest convenience.
If you have any questions, please call me at (407) 375-6260. Thank you.
Attachments
S:lprojectslFirst Baptist Church of BBlutilityc
~
u ~
a ~ ~
· cv ~ ;;, ~
~9
~:
.... ::Gy ~ . 'i. ~ !5 ,
. " t.<. " ~ <P [).. )-
c "" \I .. 0:. .s; "
,~"'. ~ to ~, _
~ .~ 4 ~ 0 _
· , · ,~. 0 ,
'.< -"or ",~ ~ 3' 'i.~ , "'~' "
.~-'" . \1'.,. .. ~ ~". / .' ,.."..
t\:1'~~ ' .... \, _. "__, ,; " :)'
~ ~~- .." ,....~>.,.~.., ~ · ~ .'7'" ":1CJ'"~.;,,>.:,,,
. ~u~'"\"'~ . \\ ~"'i"-~~ ~/ ..,. " :,)'f--.~. ,
u .. ~\ 'Ii' ..' .'F~ . ~ ~ \ _. ~~: ,,':";; fl. /' " . ' .' ~~~~., " " " '
-~, , " , ,,~ '" .' '/ . /. .~~t A!i'9 '-". .'~.
~, " " -"""..;" . ""'~~" "
" "., , '~" . .~. - 4 U , . . '''''''' y '.". . ,
',r "".- ..~;"'. ""'rr'L"_"~"'';t.~ :;.;::< _. "';"'"
. j..- . oj '~1 ~'-'.\\ -.' ~: ~ . "'" "" '1' h:.,~~ ......... '::;:cs l;;'f ", ' .'
."" ~(\" ~ .~..... -10" · --... ~/.J ,C.'$c'..', '~.,\ "'....... M-.-< <, ",
\~:- _.~~\ C'. i /' .", ~~ \ ", -..'~ j-. ;> .)':..-- ';' "X~ / ~irt!/i;J{1;'i~"l~~}~, ~~,"\t. 'to ~ . ,....:..~
\ ,,; "-- \ .m,.. ~.' ~., ' " - \-:j>J~"'!J' . 'lo'", ~':"':tt'l ~ ~ ", ~;~
\ ..,' '\ '''''''''''"" . 0,' " , ' .. ' " _ ~.\." " . ~
~ !.~... ,.' ~ · ::;:\\~.\l~ \"'; ;;;O~" '\~ '.., . ~'4' ~', .... ",# .: ,,' (I ~ ~" '. fj..' j<.'IXo' ~ .' ~ "_ _';.~'.
~ ' · '" " ... .\>>:" '. · / " " "", 'r, 'I rr, . ~K " . '.
. "" '~-:\,..." - · "'i': . . · · -.., '.;,.0, ~~.. . ..' __~ .,: / : ",!-' 1
. ~ ~~" -' " " · . - · .. ~ " · ~ \ ~~~ ~~ 4;'~ ...~. ~. . ._ .~, ~
~.~ '~~.~~, ", ~' -~"<>::. "" ," "" - "", '... "",~
' -,' '., - .. - Y. "'--" , . ., ~ ~"'" _, ',_
....1:':., >'-:~,~'~'J;; -', '~~~~~. '~~'~~~; ;:~::,e', ~,:I ~~I'!:"1.t.,:. .~,~'~%. )i
.., '.. '~. ..~~ ~~"'" "'~'" "Y, ,-h,)f.#0" <
· . :,.' , ,~ < '. .' .. ....,,>;, j ~ -::.. , .i!. --.....;;, 0' . .... .
' ..........-..,...-- ~.. ....., '~'- f?--.... .... ...... ~ . ox. ....
'\ 1. ~"'.f ':.." -'.. ~-'\:t- . ft _.' ';\,"-"" :J.;.. -:....ti" i ....., , ... ~.. ~ ~. ;<, " ; ~
.. .' '~ . . .... >.. '-'~. ~ . \. -:".. - f~ . ~i J, :; .-~ ~1l. '~. 0 ""' -'
\ . "-'.. ,~ I'" " " !, '. (..1 " ",' ~ · . . \ "
cg;~"" "',' - .-.'" , -.. ., ';,J.:)~ :,..:;~.....",....., .Jt', :....;/;;;;". . ~lt '",' # " .-./ ,
" '.. · ., ", ....'. , "PO; . ',. ~
~ .. "',,'" .":'. ... . ". M .:. ~~ r c;:{~ ~_ ~#: ' ;,;'\ ~~ ;'1./' , .
-" '''''. -- .. ,..~ . -'. .. .~~"~~,<"''''' /1 _. ,.,
' '" -, ,.. " ~ , ... .., . - . -. . ,;' .
." . .' "'.. ".J d - ',' ' ',' " :,.y~ .~. Oil;;; /N,.;",,'/f, t;J,: ,'. < .~. . " " '~
.,.. . t- -~~' r\ \~"I ':'i..,. ~ J '1 ,:f-'~:- ~ ~~)'>-;.;;<, 'v. '. '
. . ~.. "", ' . , , I.t', t~ '" b-l I" "IJI .. ~~'~.t" 'I
" " "...., ~. · " 1. "....," ~.. "" ""-~ . ul. ?,,'~~ " """:
. ", '~ ".' ",,,,,,, .. I. . " '- ~ g , , " ,
' '" \ "'" " , . '. ' h.' '" ~~... >::7..... ~ ""':>4-~7':'~r~ . . i~
.' ", " · ,'" ~ ? ".. . : "..' ~ "., ~. ; ",Yo '" ~~.... ". 'Ifii ....~ ~ "'.
' . '" . V:~.~ ~ .' , . , , " -:i1,' 1 '""';<:> . .' "" '/. ""- ....... >'.. " "'"
' " \v~., ';;.. _.-;,' .',~~ Q ",y .' '\.;' . .. ..~ _'.', (.
~. - .~ ~ ,.,,/ ~\~..~..... .:.. - ~..-}., !toli.. . ~ . ~~...'<. tl." '~''-'-,,y
" . ..,..,; / '~~~~. "I:.<!l" ~ ';' "'~.~' '." !' "",:', ',/"" ','. .' .'.
...... ~ <11'" '::<-1:~" o~ .' o.',,,,{ ,"'. " . "'"
' :'.' - '" ' ,,'. "....-'~" ~ "CI.. ~-<\,"" :'~":" c' 5. ~.:. ,~
O 0 '\ ,.,' - - -~'f 111~ ~ ~ ,... ~~'D" . "'t>t~~::'1.<!: ~".' ..' ~
'" " '//,/ ..~\\ .. .,.. ",,"\' ~ . " ,. ,
. ~.'f, -';: - - ~l'u'l \l: '".~........... .(: ". '_''-'\'~'", _.., ~ ( "
I "",'ll"''' , 1 F' \h ~ " ' ,"" '" 0. '" '.,: ~"" I:, "
'" ".." " - ~ " "" J,j1 , . ""'~ .,. <
~~ ,..l, '.. ~ , .. j .:' ~ .. . ".. ~ 1 . "t/
",,, , · ~ ~ ---.""'" ,"'" ~.." M ' .,
'", ". ',', '" \:1 ( "'-~~~ \\'.'..'.; 1 R'\' '"
\ 1 ~ \1 ~~ () ~""I/ ~ ~ ~ _ .---..- /
) '\ tl '>' "- ~ ':}. / ( ~>" "If?=-
1 (:) ~~_ '\k,.> /
.. j ~'o m ~~.:'>......'
c#' ~ ~} ,
\- .
.1'\
,~ 't."",
'\ ~-,
. !i.~..'.
~.i' M\\JV'"
~
", ,.ltf. en
,......~......~.
';:. ,-:
\.!) .~
t'- e~
~ ~
'", 'b ~
-- 10
'~ '7' 'E-
'" \0
\-
,- ~,~.
A'
,
""
"-
....
....
,)
,
~.
fl.,
:f.., ':}
oQ~O
(4'.,.
FIRST l PTIST CHURCH OF BOYN'"... ..IN BEACH
TRACT-F WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PLAT NO 1
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING APPLICATION
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
LOCATION:
Approximately 1/4 mile North of the intersection of S.\\'. 8th Street and \\Toolbright A\enue, on the
East side of S.\\'. 8th Avenue, directly north of the Cracker Barrel restaurant. The 1...U8 acre vacant
parcel, Tract "F' in the \\Toolbright Place Plat ~o. 1, is currently a portion of the \"\roolbright Place
PUD, designated for use as a church site.
CURRENT STATUS:
The current Land Use is ~loderate Density 7.26 DUlAC, C'vl0DR), with a zoning designation of
PUD. ..!\5 a part of \\'oolbright Place PUD, the property was a part of a settlement agreement \vith the
City of Boynton Beach. The approved traffic report has vested the site with 750 trips, and a twenty
(20) foot drainage easement lies in the Northwest comer of the site, providing outtaIl from the
Stormwater .Management Tract \vhich services the \\'oolbright Place PUD. The O\vner of the parcel is
the Pirst Baptist Church of Boynton Beach.
PROPOSAL:
The purpose of this application is to remove the 14.18 acre tract from the approved PlU known as
\Voolbright Place PLU, and redesignate the land use from MODR to GC, General Commercial.
Concurrently, a rezoning from PUD to Planned Commercial Development (FCD) is requested.
Additionally, a Master Plan Application for the proposed PCD, as well as a revised master plan for the
proposed modification boundary of\"\'oolbright Place PuU will be filed.
On November 21, 1986, the Pirst Baptist Church of Boynton Beach closed on a 14.18 acre parcel of
land known as Tract "P" of Woolbright Place Plat No.1, purchasing it from Howard R Scharlin, as
trustee of\Voolbright Place PlTD, as seen in the attached \Varranty Deed (ORB 5083 PG. 1044). In
the accompanying Declaration of Restrictive covenants, recorded in ORB 5591, PG. 830, Paragraph 2,
Imposition ojRestrictions, various uses were prohibited, including the sale of alcoholic be\erages, tobacco
stores, bars, drive in restaurants, and automobile service stations.
This declaration was in place to protect the First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach, "vho had plans to
construct a new church building on the property. The uses described in the restrictive covenant were
considered indispensable to the desired atmosphere and environment for the proposed church.
...\tter the closing on the property, the outlined restrictions were not adhered to, and a serrice station,
were approved and built. These violations have rendered this site undesirable for development as a
community church site, and the property o\"VTIer is seeking to market and sell the property in the most
advantageous way. A commercial bnd use, "\vith a Health Care Campus is seen as the best option to
achieve this goal.
FIRST B. ."fIST CHURCH OF BOYNT.. .~ BEACH
TRACT-F WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PLAT NO 1
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING APPLICATION
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
page two
The property's proposed land used designation, GC, and accompanying zoning designation ofPCD
are suitable for the particular parcel for a number of reasons. The property has 1260 feet of frontage
on S.W. 8th Street, and is just north of the Woolbright Place PlJD. The site is strategically located near
major east-west and north-south arterials. The intersection of S.W. 8th Street and Woolbright Road is
approximately 700 feet south of the site. The Interstate 95/Woolbright Place interchange is
approximately 100 feet East of the S.\\'. 8th Street / Woolbright Road intersection. A .Master Plan
application will be ftled with the City of Boynton Beach which outlines a Planned Commercial
Development, with a mi..-x of an Assisted Care Living Facility, Nursing Home Facility, and Medical
Offtces. Directly across the E-3 Canal to the west of the site is a residential retirement community
known as Liesureville. This site will service the needs of the community, and provide excellent access
for emergency vehicles to 1-95.
From a land use perspective, this modiftcation will provide an excellent transitional buffer from the
residential development to the west (Liesureville), the residential PUD to the northeast (Trammel
Crow), and the Woolbright Place PCD to the south, which included Cracker Barrel, a gas station, and
Home Depot. Liesureville has a view today of the back door of the Cracker Barrel restaurant, which
includes the dumpsters, and open kitchen area. The existing one hundred ftfty (150) foot E-3 canal is
an existing buffer between Liesureville and the proposed PCD. Additional site design elements will be
incorporated into the site plan to further minimize any possible impacts, such as visual, landscape, and
sound buffering, creating an intermediate use which develops the property in a compatible, unified
design.
FIRST:... ...PTIST CHURCH OF BOYN'i IN BEACH
TRACT -F WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PLAT NO 1
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING APPLICATION
ILLUSTRATION OF THE WATER DE11AND AND SEWAGE
FLOW FOR DEVELOP.MENT UNDER THE PROPOSED
ZONING IN CONTRAST WIlli DE11AND UNDER THE
CURRENT ZONING. WATER DE11A.L'JD AND SEWAGE FLOW
IS ESTIMATED USING THE STANDARDS ADOPTED BY TIm
PALM BEACH COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT.
CURRENT PROJECTED CHANGE +
WATER DEMAND 30,962 GAL/DA Y 24,707.3 GAL/DAY - 6260.7 GAL/DA Y
SEWER DEMAND 23,016 GAL/DAY 24,707.3 GAL/DAY + 1691.3 GAL/DAY
METHODOLOGY:
EXISTING:
LWD USE DESIGNATION: MODERATE DENSITY 7.26 DU / AC (MODR)
DENSITY PER SE'ITLEivf&'l"T AGREElYIENT = 8.08 DU / AC
Av'ERAGE POPULATION PER UNIT: 2.39 PERSONS/UNIT
1\.lAXIMUM UNITS ON 14.18 AC SITE PER SETILE"\1ENT AGREE1\.1ENT: 115 UNITS.
POPUL\TION CALCDL\TION (14.18 ACRES X 8.08 D1:/AC X 2.39): 274 PERSONS
POTABLE WAlERDEMMTI (274 X 113 GAL/CAP/DAY): 30,962 GAL/CAP/DAY
SANITARY SEWERDE..\,L\l'\TI (274 X 84/GAL/CAP/DXY): 23,016 GAL/CAP/DAY
PROPOSED:
Li\i'\JD USE DESIGNATION:
NLi\...XIMUM TOTAL FLOOR .AREA:
MA..Th\fU:\l SQUARE FOOTAGE (14.18 AC X 43560 S.F. X 40%)
POTABLE WAlER DEMAND (247,073 S.F. X 1/10 GAL/S.F):
SANITARY SEWER DEMAl'\TI ('247,073 S.F. X 1/10 GAL/S.F):
GENERAL COMMERCIAL(GC)
40%
247,073 S. F.
24,707.3 GAL/CAP/DAY
24,707.3 GAL/CAP/DAY
CALCUL\TIONS BASED ON CHAPTER 10.0.6 FLOW RAlES
FIRST E .~IST CHURCH OF BOYN~ ..'i BEACH
TRACT-F WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PLAT NO 1
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING APPLICATION
A COMPARISON OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED IMPACTS
CREATED BY DEVELOPMENT
1. P01R."'JTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE, TYPE OF D\\'ELLING L1'ITS A.L~D
PROPOSED POTENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE, n-PE OF DEVELOP:iYffi'\JT
DE."'JSITY
(D\VELLING
UNITS/ACRE)
CURRENT LAND 7.26
USE (MODR)
:NL-\...'X. FLOOR
AREA RATIO
(FAR)
N/A
USES ALLO\"'\'ED
PROPOSED LAND N/A
USE (GC)
40%
. Single-Family dwellings
. Two-Family dwellings or duplexes
. Multiple-Family dwellings,
townhouses, garden apartments and
cluster housing;
. Private, nonprofit clubs, community
centers, ClVlC and social
organization facilities;
. Private parks, tennis courts,
playgrounds, putting greens, golf
courses, driving ranges and other
recreation facilities;
. Public utility buildings, stmctw:es,
and facilities necessary to service the
surrounding neighborhood;
. Houses of worship, schools, nUISing
homes, nursery schools,
kindergartens and hospitals;
. "Neighborhood" commercial uses
which are determined at the time of
zoning to PUD, to be compatible
with the existing and future
development of adjacent and nearby
lands outside the PUD;
. Other uses of a nature similar to
those listed, after determination and
recommendation by the planning
and development board, a
determination by the govemmg
body at the time of zoning that the
use or uses are appropriate to the
PUD development;
. Permitted uses for a PUD District
shall be specified in the application
for zorung of land to PUD
classification;
(please see attached exhibit "A")
FIRST I .)TIST CHURCH OF BOYN1. .N BEACH
TRACT-F WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PLAT NO 1
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING APPLICATION
2. USES ALLOV/ED :N PROPOSED ZONING:
Please see attached Exhibit "A"
USES E..XCLUDED L."'J PROPOSED ZONING:
Please see attached Exlubit "A"
3. Th\11NG AND PILASING OF DEVELOPMR'\JT
The project will reach buildout in the year 2000.
4. EivIPLOYEE PROJECTIONS
EXIITING CAlflTIATION
(14.18 ACRES X 8.08 DU / AC X 2.39): 274 PERSONS
PROPOSED EMPLOYEE PROJECTIONS
(2 E.J.vfPLOYEES PER BEDS-120 + 1 ~\tfP PER 1000 S.F. = ABOUT 300 EMPLOYEES
5. TRAFFIC COMPARISOK
The nature of Traffic generation rates makes it difficult to compare traffic generation in a
general way, as each use has a different trip rate associated with it. It is accurate to say that
commercial traffic generation rates are higher than residential rates. The attached Traffic
Report was conducted based on the planned development as a Health Care Campus. A
residential development has a general traffic generation rate of 10 trips per day per unit.
The current site is vested with 750 trips under the current approval. The proposed trip
generation rate is 2747. With the current vesting, the new trips associated with this project
with be 1997 trips, as seen below
Approval
Woolbright Place PUD, Church Parcel
First Baptist Church PCD
New Trips (Net Change)
Traffic Generation (Trips per Day)
750
2,747
1,997
6. WATER DE..l'vfAL,-TI
CURRENT PROJECTED CHANGE +
WATER DEMAND 30,962 GAL/DAY 24,707.3 GAL/DAY - 6260.7 GAUDAY
7. SEWER DE..l'vL'\.:.~D
CURRENT PROJECTED CHANGE +
SEWER DEMAND 23,016 GAL/DAY 24,707.3 GAL/DAY + 1691.3 GAUDAY
FIRST 1. PTIST CHURCH OF BOYNl ~N BEACH
TRACT-F WOOLBRIGHT PLACE PLAT NO 1
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING APPLICATION
8. POPULATION PROJECTION UNDER CURREI\JT ZONING/LA1'JD USE Ao.'\JD
WIlli PROPOSED CHANGE:
EXISTING CALCULATION
(14.18 ACRES X 8.08 DUlAC X 2.39):
PROPOSED POPUIATION PROJECTIONS
(300 EMPLOYEES + RESIDENTS)
CHANGE
274 PERSONS
420 PERSONS
+ 146 PERSONS (+52%)
11. SPECIFIC REQUlRE1\ffiNTS FOR PLANNED ZONING DISTRICTS SPECIFIC
REGULATIONS:
The proposed project meets or exceeds the specific design criteria for planned commercial
developments as follows:
Desi Criteria
!vfinimum land area of 3 contiguous acres
Off-street loading shall have one bay for each
twenty-five thousand (25,000) square feet of
gross floor area or fraction thereof, screened
from view.
Lot Coverage not to exceed forty (40) percent.
Open Lot Areas shall have adequate grading
and drainage, continuously maintained in a
dust-free condition, subject to the approval of
the community appearance board.
Setbacks shall be as follows:
Front yard: 40 feet
Side yard: 30 feet
Rear yard: 40 feet
Peripheral greenbelt with a minimum width of
ten (10) feet, except when abutting residential
districts, when it shall be twen five 25 feet.
Pro osed Develo ment
14.18 contiguous acres
At the time of the master plan and site plan
application, this regulation will be met.
The proposed PCD will not exceed forty (40)
percent.
At the time of the master plan and site plan
application, this regulation will be met.
At the time of the master plan and site plan
application, this regulation will be met.
At the time of the master plan and site plan
application, this regulation will be met.
DEVEL.~PMENT SERVICES DEPARTMEN I
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97- 558
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Jerzy Lewicki -l
Senior Planner -. - ..J
./
DATE: November 14, 1997
SUBJECT: Rezoning Master Plan - 1 st Review
Project: First Baptist Church - PCD
Location: Northeast corner of Industrial Way and SW 8th Street
File No.: LUAR 97-002
The following is a list of 1 st review comments regarding the modification of the master plan
review of the plans for the above-referenced project.
MASTER PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. The submitted traffic study has to be evaluated by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division
for compliance with the adopted traffic performance standards. (LDR, Chapter 3, Art. IV.
Sec. 3.S)
2. On the master plan provide information regarding the availability of utilities for the proposed
complex (LDR, Chapter 3, Art. IV. Sec. 3. P)
3. In order to conform to landscape regulations, reduce the spacing of trees within the
proposed landscape buffer from 50 feet to 40 feet.
4. Indicate the proposed number of stories and proposed floor areas for all buildings proposed
on the site.
5. It is recommended that the landscape buffer along SW 8th Street will be coordinated with the
design of the Cracker Barrel buffer in respect to the proposed species, their spacing and
configuration.
6. On the master plan provide required perimeter setbacks for the site in conformance with the
zoning regulations.
7. With the second submittal provide more specific information regarding the proposed office
use.
8. Provide a unity of control document as required by the LDR.
xc: Central File
JL
J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\First Baptist Church of BB\LUAR\mod-master-plan-1 st-rev-comments-1 st baptist
PCD.doc
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
r .~ @ ~ D W ~ fn)
Uu Nf1V 71991 ~
POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
97-0067
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH BOYNTON BEACH-LAND USE,??J1(
AMENDMENT/REZONING
NOVEMBER 7, 1997
I have reviewed the above plans and have no comments/recommendations.
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM
TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Kevin John Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist
Re:
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
Land Use Amendment I Rezoning
DATE:
November 13, 1997
r-jfr
Site Suecific Reauirements
There are no comments on the above land use / rezoning plans.
The project should continue in the normal review process.
Kjh
File
m~@~UW~~
i . \ i 1 NO'! \ A III \EJ
-oW
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-300
PLANNING AptND
ZONING DE .
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Administrator
AI Newbold, Deputy Director of Development ~
FROM:
DATE:
November 13, 1997
SUBJECT:
FffiST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BOYNTON BEACH -
LAND USE AMENDMENT/REZONING (LUAR 97-002)
1st SUBMITTAL REVIEW COMMENTS
We have reviewed the subject plans and offer the following comments that should be addressed
prior to the project being forwarded for Board review:
Buildim! Division (Site Snecific Comments) Michael E. Haag (561) 375-6350
1. Add to the master plan and preliminary drainage plan notes, symbols and dimensions that
will represent the location and width of at least one accessible route that is required from the
abutting public street to an accessible building and/or tenant space entrance for all three (3)
buildings. [Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.3 Accessible
Route]
2. Add to the master and preliminary drainage plan notes, symbols and dimensions that will
represent the location and width of the accessible route that is required from the access
aisle(s) located at each accessible parking space to an accessible building and/or tenant space
entrance for all three (3) buildings. [Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction,
Section 4.6 Parking and Passenger Loading Zones]
3. Place a note on the master plan and preliminary drainage plan indicating that the site is
designed in compliance with the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction.
En2ineerim! Division (Site Snecific Comments) Sebastian Puda & Ken Hall (561) 375-6280
1. Master plan sheet MP-1 needs to be signed and sealed by design professional.
2. Conflict exists between overhead wires and proposed buildings and parking lots (poles and
guy anchors). Show proposed changes to eliminate conflicts. [LDR, Chap. 3, Art. IV, Sec.
3,0]
3. Plans show southern entrance to property to be 70 feet wide. LDR, Chap. 23, Art. II, H,1
states that the maximum width of any drive at the right-of-way line shall be 32 feet. Obtain
Director of Development approval for wider drive.
4. Changing of Tract F from PUD to PCD requires platting in accordance with LDR, Chap. 2,
Sec. 6, F, 12. I I
~l'~ \ \ \--1 (1~
MEH/SP/KH:bg v _____
xc: Michael E. Haag, Sebastian Puda, Ken Hall 0 r- c
\ \CH\MA1N\SHRDAT A IDevelopment\Building-6870IDocuments\ TRC\First Baptist Land Use Amendment- Rezoning.doc
FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION
Memorandum No. 97-315
fD)rn@~owrn~
lJIJ tIlY I 7 I99T i ~
'-
PLANNING AND
IONI G DEPT.
TO: Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning & Zoning Division
FROM:
William Cavanaugh, Asst. Fire Marshal j I If, I Cav~ ~ f'
Fire-Rescue Department /W"V ~~
DATE: November 17,1997
SUBJ: First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
North of SW 8 St. and Woolbright Rd.
LUAR 97-002
We have no objections at this time.
CC: Deputy Chief Gale
File
00
u WI m~
.191m ~
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #97-287
"
j>
:"1-'
THRU:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Dir~c~
C. Larry Roberts, Public Works Director C J1 L--
TO:
FROM:
Mark Lips, Sanitation Foreman
SUBJ:
Land Use AmendmentJRezoning - First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
DATE:
November 18, 1997
The Public Works Department has no comments at this time reference the Land Use
Amendment/Rezoning for the First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach.
>~G(~
Mark Lips
Sanitation Foreman
ML/cr
00
~[!l~~\'urn
to 19-
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-517
PlANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
TO:
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planing and Zoning Director
tl
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent .
15t Baptist Church Masterplan Revi Ion / Rezoning Request
RE:
Date:
November 19, 1997
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the plans for the 1 sl Baptist Church
Masterplan Revision and Rezoning Request. There are no recreation-related issues
on either of these matters. We recommend that these plans proceed through the
normal review process.
JW
MEMORANDt:M
Utilities # 97. 387
TO:
Tambri Heyden.
Plarming & zomnfVirClctor
John A. Guidry,
Director of Utiliti
November 18, ]997
FROM:
Date:
SUBJECT: First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach,
Land use Amendment/Re-zonin&
-"'~"-~~---.._--.
Staffhas reviewed the above reterenced project and offer the following comments:
Utilities ha5 no comment.
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through tht review process.
!fyou have an)' questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazz~lla at 375-6404.
sml Baptistl
xc: Clyde "Skip" l'r1ilor
Peter Ma7~lla
File
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #97-305
rnr-@
o lS \.!!J
DEe
8.
ill
~~'J'.;,..i
THRU:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director, () ,
C. Larry Roberts, Public Works Director ()~V
TO:
FROM:
Mark Lips, Sanitation Foreman (V)/J'L-
SUBJ:
Land Use Amendment/Rezoning - 2nd Submittal- First Baptist Church
DATE:
December 5, 1997
Public Works has no comments for Land Use, but we will require better access to
dumpster locations. Also drawing for dumpster enclosures on Master Plan.
ML/cr
MEMORANDUM
Utilities # 97- 418
TO:
Tambri Heyden.
Planning & Zoning Director
V
FROM:
John A. Guidry, \
Director of Utilities ~
Date:
December 8, 1997
SUBJECT:
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach,
Land Use Amendment/Zoning, Second Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments:
Utilities has no comment.
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
sml Baptist3
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
rn@rnow~rnJ
i~: I
i' II
DEe 3 1991 tj
POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
97-0074
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
TO:
FROM:
T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS ~
RE:
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH of BOYNTON BEACH-LAND USE
AMENDMENT/REZONE _2ND SUBMITTAL
DATE:
DECEMBER 3, 1997
I have reviewed the above plans and have no comments/recommendations.
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. DD 97-323
fD)~li1UW~~
IUU DEe.. 5 . ,t!U
FROM:
Al Newbold, Deputy Director of Development
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Administrator
DATE:
December 3, 1997
RE:
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BOYNTON BEACH-
LAND USE AMENDMENT/REZONING (LUAR 97-002)
2ND SUB MITT AL REVIEW COMMENTS
We recommend approval ofthe above referenced project subject to the following comments.
Buildin~ Division (Site Specific Comments)
1. Add to the master plan and paving & drainage plan notes, symbols and dimensions that will
represent the location and width of at least one accessible route that is required from the
abutting public street to an accessible building and/or each tenant space entrance for all three
buildings. [Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.3, Accessible
Route]
2. Add to the master plan and paving & drainage plan notes, symbols and dimensions that will
represent the location and width of the accessible route that is required from the access aisles
located at each accessible parking space to an accessible building and/or each tenant space
entrance. [Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.6, Parking and
Passenger Loading Zones]
3. Place a note on the paving and drainage plan indicating that the site is designed in
compliance with the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction.
4. The master plan shows the footprint ofthe medical office building within the water
management easement and the footprint of the C.L.F. building within a FPL easement.
Relocate the buildings or extinguish the easements. Note the footprint of the nursing home
appears to abut the FPL easement. Building overhangs are not allowed within an easement.
En~ineerine: Division (Site Specific Comments)
1. Changing of Tract F from PUD to PCD requires platting in accordance with LDR Chapter 2,
Section 6.F.12.
2. Each facility shall have the appropriate number of handicap parking spaces per the latest
edition of the Florida Accessibility Code.
3. Show the total number of parking spaces provided under the "Parking Chart".
4. Under the "Notes" heading, add to the comment referencing re-routing the FPL power lines,
the following: All existing utility easements not needed shall be abandoned and all new
easements required shall be shown on the master plan and plat.
S. Obtain a 20 foot drainage easement for the drainage pipe from the lake across the Palm
Beach Leisureville property and relocate the existing 20 foot drainage easement within the
project to fall within the center of the existing 30" R.C.P.
Department of Development Memorandum No. DD 97-323
Re: First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning, 2nd Submittal
December 3, 1997
Page #2
6. Provide a master storm water management plan outlining the primary and secondary drainage
and stormwater facilities needed for the development. [LDR Chapter 3, Article IV, Section
3.T.]
7. Provide a set of "typical" dimensions for the parking lot areas to show the parking stall
lengths and the minimum backup distance as specified in Standard Drawing B-90013.
MH/SP/KH:ck
Xc: Michael Haag
Sebastian Puda
Ken Hall
C:\My Documents\First Baptist Land Use Amendment-Rezoning 2nd.doc
Recreation & Park Department Memorandum
-
l~ ~ @ ~ U ~ ~~
DEe __ 8.
,
~NING "ND
ZONING DEPT.
To:
Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director
From:
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Re:
/ ST 6AfJTij-T c I/l.l~c.. H
)~/g/q7
I I
Date:
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the above listed plans. There are
currently no outstanding recreation-related issues. The plans may continue through the
normal review process.
JW
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION
Memorandum No. 97-322
Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning & Zoning Division
William D. Cavanaugh, Asst. Fire Marshal /I I J:11
Fire Rescue Department /t/Ifi.J(LA::t1-
December 10, 1997
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
X mile North of SW 8 St. & Woolbright Rd. intersection
LUAR 97-002
We have no objections at this time.
CC: Fire Marshal Gale
File
rnm@u,
DEelOM
PlANNING AND
ONING DEpt
00
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 97-528
TO:
FROM:
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to the Director of Utilities
j)/J1.'.I. ../
Dan~IDeCarlo ~
DATE:
November 6,1997
RE:
First Baptist Church - LUARlRezoning 97-002
This office is processing the above application for a land use amendment and rezoning.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Department of Community Affairs for
compliance review, I am requesting that you provide me with specific information on the
current availability of facilities that would serve the subject property and a statement
indicating that there are adequate urban services available to serve the maximum demand
as would be allowed by the proposed land use classification.
To assist you with your review, I have enclosed a location map and application which
includes data on changes in potable water and sanitary sewer demands. I hope that given
the size of the subject property, you are able to provide a specific statement which
indicates that this application would have no negative impact on service availability.
The state has a specific time frame within which this information must be transmitted to
them. Therefore, your response would be greatly appreciated at your earliest convenience.
If you have any questions, please call me at (407) 375-6260. Thank you.
Attachments
S:\projects\First Baptist Church of BBlutilityc