Loading...
LEGAL APPROVAL PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 99-116 TO: FROM: Don Johnson Deputy Building Official Nr;..~ Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning DATE: May 3, 1999 SUBJECT: Rectified Plans for Grove Plaza and 7 -Eleven Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents for your departmental records regarding the two projects that has received final sign-off PROJECT NAME: Grove Plaza MSMD 97-004 7 -Eleven at Grove Plaza COUS 97-004 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning Building Planning & Zoning Engineering Occupational License Community Redevelopment May 3,1999 Donna West Carnahan-Procter and Associates, Inc. 6191 West Atlantic Boulevard Margate, FL 33063 Re: Grove Plaza, MPMD 97-004 7-Eleven at Grove Plaza, CaDS 97-004 Dear Ms. West: As the applicant for the above-referenced projects, enclosed is your rectified plans approved by the City Commission. This is being sent to you for your files as it has been rectified and staff comments have been addressed and accurately represents the approved master plan. Sincerely, -;.,. -- -'" / 'l../ _ C-- c.-. Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning MWR:jrna America's Gateway to the Gulfstream 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 99-116 TO: FROM: Don Johnson Deputy Building Official ;1?6--~ Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning DATE: May 3. 1999 SUBJECT: Rectified Plans for Grove Plaza and 7 -Eleven Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents for your departmental records regarding the two projects that has received final sign-off PROJECT NAME: Grove Plaza MSMD 97-004 7 -Eleven at Grove Plaza COUS 97-004 , . , , DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning Building Planning & Zoning Engineering Occupational License Comt7lUnity Redevelopment January 25, 1999 Donna West Carnahan-Procter and Associates, Inc. 6191 West Atlantic Boulevard Margate, FL 33063 Re: File No.: Location: 7-Eleven at Grove Plaza COUS 97-004 Southeast comer of Hypoluxo Road and Lawrence Road Dear Ms. West: Enclosed is the City of Boynton Beach Development Order for Conditional Use Approval granted on January 19, 1999. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this office at (561)742-6260. Sincerely, ~ _L-:. ~ Michael W. Rumpf Acting Manager of Planning & Zoning MWR:jma J:ISHRDAT AIPlanninglSHAREDIWP\PROlECTS\grove plaza\Oevelopment Order Letler,doc America's Gateway to the Gulfstream 100 East Boynton Beacb Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Reub, Florida 33425-0310 Pbone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259 ~- ----- I"f /J'I .:= N LlC::; U DEVELOPMP~T ORDER OF THE CITY COMMI~~ION OF THE L, . Y OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIL _ \. PROJECT NAME: 7-Eleven at Grove Plaza APPLICANT'S AGENT: Donna West, Carnahan-Procter and Associates, Inc. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 6191 West Atlantic Boulevard, Margate, FL 33063 DATE OF CITY COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING: January 19,1999 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Conditional Use Approval LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Southeast corner of Hypoluxo Road and Lawrence Road DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO. THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows: OR X THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant ~HAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included". 4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby ~ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. ~\\\\\""""lilll. ~,'\ 0 Y AI "//. ~ " ~ ''f'" 0 ~ ~... () 'fiPo;:;:... ~ ~ ~ \. ~..,. .. <S) ~ == !:: I !J~". ~ % -0 " 0= ::: ~= ~ ~ % 1920 j ~ch. U4'./ ~ ~ ~ City Clerk J~/;1. (.0 RIO" ~,# J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\grove plaza\7 -ELEVEN\COUS\OEVELOPMENT ORDER -COUS.doc 'IIII/IImn\\\\\\; 7. Other DATED: eR?/9 ? EXHIBIT "e" Conditions of Approval Project name: 7-Eleven at Grove Plaza File number: COUS 97-004 Reference: The plans consists of 16 sheets identified as 3rd Review. Conditional Use. File # COOS 97-004 with an October"'O 1998 Planning; and Zonina Deoartment date stamo markina - . - -. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: None X UTILITIES Comments: 1. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code X requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LOR Chap. 6, Art. , Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater, (See Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your engineering drawings, for the Utilities Department approvaL 2. Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be X paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. Based upon a I-inch meter the fee is $790.02. 3. The engineering drawings show a separate meter for irrigation to be X installed by others, Please be advised that Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may, therefore, not be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 4. The Utilities Department will not require surety for installation of the X water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the city before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy. 5. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has X approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) FIRE Comments: None X POLICE Comments: None X Page 2 7-Eleven at Grove Plaza File No.: COGS 98-004 DEPARTME~TS INCLUDE REJECT ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 6. Engineer's certification letter stating that drainage conforms with all rules, X regulations, codes, etc. of the City of Boynton Beach. [LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2.] 7. All drainage, signage, striping and pavement (1 st lift of asphalt) shall be X completed on entire Grove Plaza required improvements plans associated with the plat prior to certificate of occupancy for 7-Eleven. 8. Permits required for demolition and clearing and grubbing. X 9. Screen the loading zone from view at ground level with solid, stucco, X masonry wall painted on both sides. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 10. Provide copy of the South Florida Water Management District permit for X the project that identifies the established finish floor elevation (Chapter 2 - Definitions of the Boynton Beach Amendments to the Standard Building Code) at building permit application time. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None X FORESTER/ENVlRONMENT ALIST Comments: 11. The applicant must provide landscape and irrigation improvements to the X grassed medians on Hypoluxo Road abutting the entire site (parcels "A" through "F"). The plans must be submitted and approved through Palm Beach County and the City of Boynton Beach Leisure Services Division. The city will maintain the medians upon successful inspection by the staff. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: Page 3 7-Eleven at Grove Plaza File No.: CODS 98-004 D EP AR Tl'vlENTS INCLUDE REJECT 12. The length of all parking terminal islands must be the same dimension as X the adjacent parking spaces. City of Boynton Beach drawing number #B- 90012. Change landscape plan to match site plan. 13. Extent of colored stripes on project is inconsistent with Chapter 9, X Community Design Plan. Limit stripes to lengths on the facia, not to exceed 5 feet on either side of a sign feature, and on the same side of the facia as the sign feature. Paint or cover remainder of facia similar to building. 14. Note: No fuel pumps to be permitted until Lawrence Road is widened to X four lanes. Revise note on plan accordingly, and repeat note at a visible location on the site plan graphic. 15. Add the following notes to the landscape plan: X - Sod square footage to be determined in the field - A mulch other than cypress will be used - The source of the irrigation system 16. Revise the buffer planting tree count to include I tree or 3 palms / 401f. X Three palms = I tree. Ch.2 Sec. I I Par.L.3.f 17. Slightly relocate north and west buffer Oak trees to reduce encroachment X on lighting fixtures. 18. Light fixtures required to illuminate the entrance access isle be directed X away from the residential area to the south of the subject site. 19. To maximize compatibility with the adjacent residential land uses, reduce X total project height to 20 feet and amend plans accordingly. 20. Add hedge material to meet the continuous hedge requirement adjacent to X right-of-ways. Continue the Ixora hedge north, along the west side of the building's sidewalk to the planting mass east of the dumpster, and from the southeast comer of the building east to the comer at the driveway end of the #4 parking space. Continue the CI around the phone pad, south to the comer. 21. Under canopy lighting not to exceed 60 foot candles, and under canopy X lighting fixture not to be visible from off premises (recess fixture or block view with proper placement of facia). 22. Provide safe access and markings for student access to the satisfaction of X the Palm Beach County School Board. Page 4 7-Eleven at Grove Plaza File No.: COUS 98-004 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 23. No alcohol shall be sold before 5:00 p.m. on weekdays. X ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 24. It is recommended that the request be denied. X ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 25. Change comment no. 19 to add: To maximize compatibility with the X adjacent residential land uses, reduce total project height "which shall include the reduction of the canopv height" to 20 feet and amend plans accordingly. 26. Delete comment #23 dealing with alcohol sales. X 27. Change comment # 13 to read "Proposed pump canopy signage and colors X be revised and returned for Commission approval. The applicant would pay the required cost of public notification." 28. Change comment # 14 to read "Construction of the gas pumps be allowed X at the time of letting of the contract for the four laning of Lawrence Road." MWR:dim J'ISHROATAIPLANNINGISHAREOIWPIPROJECTS\GROVE PLAZAI7 -ELEVENlCOUSICOND OF APPR - 3RO REVIEW-COUS-REVISEO 11-2,DOC MEETING MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSiON BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 19,1999 Comn sioner Titcomb moved to approve the project, subject to the Mayor's comments, which include the reduction of the canopy height to 20', that COf'ilent #23 dealing with alcohol sales bt:.: eliminated, and that construction of th~ gas pumps be allowed at the time of letting of the contract for the four-Ianing of Lawrence Road. Commissioner Titcomb further requested that the stripes be removed from the canopy and just logos appear on the canopy. Cornrnissiorl2r Denahan seconded the motion. Vice ~la'lor Jask:ewicz sa;d that several neighbors in the area have contac~2d her a;-d based uoen their concert,s is not votng in faver of the oroiect, , ' .; 1"1r. Cik!in agreed to leave the signage alone for no'l'i. Mr. Cik!in requested that the appiicant be al!o',',ed to come back ard shoy" the Commission what it proposes. It would be basicaily the lego with a few stripes, but would be compact. If the City cces not like it, the:l the str:~es ','Jou!d be removed, 1"1r. Ciklin requested the appiicant be given an opportunity to preser,t their revised pian. Commissioner Titcomb stated he would be amenable to this request if the Commission were given an opportunity to approve the treatment on the canopy. Mr. Ciklin agreed that the City Commission would have a separatE' opportunity to approve the treatment on the canopy. Commissioner Titcomb amended his motion to include this caveat. Commissioner Denahan seconded ttle amendrllent. Mr. Rumpf stated this would require public notification because it would be completion of the conditional use approval process and the applicant would have to pay for the additional costs for public notification. Mr. Ciklin stated the applicant would pay this cost. Motion carried 4-1 (Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz dissented). Item D- Ratification of Planning & Development Board Action: 1. Project: 7-Eleven at Grove Plaza Agent; Donna West, Carnahan-Proctor & Associates, Inc. Location: Southeast corner of Hypoluxo Road & Lawrence Road Description: Grove Plaza (Donna West, Agent) Southeast corner of Hypoluxo & 28 MEETING MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORlDA JANUARY 19, 1999 Lawrence Roads Request for modifications to the previously approved n~aster plan to reconfigure lot lines to create a separate cornman area tract, modify Parcel A from 7500 sq. ft. of retc.iljpharmacy to a 2960 sq. ft. convenience store/gas station, modify Parcel C from 4500 sq. ft, of retail to 6540 sq, ft, of retail, modify Pa r '..:el D from 6500 sq. ft. of retail to 9000 sq. ft. of retail, add turn lane and change the southerly driveway. (TABLED TO JANUARY 1517 MEETING) 1\1ayor Taylor asked if the Commiss;cner had ary qLestions. There '.vere :icne. Motion Commissioner Titcomb moved for approval of the request for modifications to the previously approved master plan to reconfigure lot lines to create a separate common area tract, modify Parcel A from 7500 sq. ft. of retail/ pharmacy to a 2960 sq. ft. convenience store/gas station, modify Parcel C from 4500 sq. ft. of retail to 6540 sq. ft. of retail, modify Parcel 0 from 6500 sq. ft. of retail to 9000 sq. ft. of retail, add turn lane and change the southerly driveway. Motion seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Tillman. Motion carried 4-1 (Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz dissented). Description: Lake Worth Christian School Donald E. Bryan, A.I.A., President Lake Worth Christian School East side of High Road approximately one mile north of Gateway Boulevard Request for approval to construct a one- story, approximately 10,800 square foot elementary school building and related site modifications (,1 the existing high school campus B. Project: Agent: Owner: Location: 29 MEETING MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 19,1999 iV1ayor Taylor noted that the P!anning and Development Board approved the project by 7-0 vete. Vice ;\1ayor Jaskiew;cz stated the building was beautJul. rv1ayor Taylor asked the applicant if he agreed with all staff conditions and trle applicant stated they did. Motion Commissioner Titcomb moved for approval of the project. ['-lotion seconde~ by i'-1aycr Pro Tern Tillman. rv1otion carried 5-0. C. Project: Agent/Owner location: Description: Peter Brown Peter Brown 125 SW 1 st Avenue Request for approval for abandonment of a portion of alley abutting property Motion Commissioner Titcomb moved for approval of the project. Motion seconded by Commissioner Denahan. Motion carried 5-0. VIII. BIDS: None IX. DEVELOPMENT PLANS: None X. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion of the addition of a minority and women's prefer(nce for City contracts and bids Mayor Pro Tem Tillman would like the City Attorney to study the possibility of adopting a policy for preference to minorities and women in the awarding of contracts and bids. Mayor Pro Tem Tillman stated that the County and the School Board have adopted this preference and he has reviewed the County's ordinance and feels it contains some provisions that the City could utilize in adopting an ordnance. Mayor Pro Tern Tillman 30 MEETING MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMiSSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORJDA JANUARY 19,1999 stated this ,tioL.;ld provide a means fer the City to enhance opportunities fer minorities and wome:1 to do business 'ldh the City, I'-1ayor Taylor inq.Jired if trle City when reque5~ing contracts asks if a firm is a minority cr women's business, City ~'1anager 'vVill~s stated there is no procedure for ~his. iv1ayor T-' I ~ ,... ..~,...;.' t At:,,,,.- ~ , r' ..,~..,c,-., -,-.,- ~ ;:l ,., ",,...-,--""; ",' -,., -, f' -,.,-,-:":-~-.',... ::J/ or I equcscc-.J J'a "--": 'c't ,-rei vi f-'rel""drC ~ ;.Jr,..i!-,\...::'cw o r,..JJ'd; :Ce or Lv' ,~,~c ::c '--,n, XI. LEGAL: A. Ordinances - 2iC Reading - PUBLIC HEARING 1. Proposed Ordinance No. 099-02 Re: Amerlding Chapter 2 Administration, Article c:; Section 2-91. Violations and Penalties by amending "Schedule 0. Civil Pena' ~s" to include penaites for motor vehicle/boat repairs in commercial or public parking lots Attorney Cherof read proposed Orciinance 099-02 by title only. Mayor Taylor stated this was the t~d Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 099-02 and asked if anyone in the public wished to address the Ordinance. Hearing none, closed the public hearing. Motion Mayor Pro Tem Tillman moved to approve Ordinance 099-02. fv10tion seconded by Commissioner Denahan. City Clerk Sue Kruse polled the vote. The vote was unanimous. 2. Proposed Ordinance No. 099-03 Re: Clearly defining the City's policy regarding board absences and removal Attorney Cherof read proposed Ordinance 099-03 by title only. Mayor Taylor stated this was the 2nd Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 099-03 and asked if anyone in the public wished to address the Ordinance. Hearing none, closed the public hearing. Motion 31 MEETING MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 19, 1999 Vice r-1ayor Jaskie'Nicz moved to approve Ordinance 099-03, rv1etion seconded by rv1ayor Pro Tem Tillman. City Clerk Sue Kruse pel led the vete, The 'Iote 'N?S unanimous. B Or,"';'nanc"'- - 15~ RO:::l~"- '" . ,-,I, " ~::, ~,-,I..J I:~ 1. Proposed Ordinance No, OOC!- (deleted Trom the age, ) Re: Adult enterta:nmen~ 2. Proposed Ordinance No. 099-04 Re: Authorizing the abandonment of a portion of alley west of property located at 125 SW 1 ~ Avenue Attorney CheiOf read Proposed Ordinance No. 099-04 by title only. Motion Commissioner Titcomb moved to approve Proposed Ordinance No. 99-04. Motion seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Tillman. City Clerk Sue Kruse polled the vote. The vote was unanimous, c. Resolutions: None D. Other: 1. Legality of Ocean Ridge Ordinance regarding permits for beach events (Tabled until the February.z 1999 Meeting) XII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: A. Items requested for discussion by Vice Mayor Shirley Jaskiewicz 32 MEETING \'i~UTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 19, 1999 1. Ocean Riece Pr-ccert'I' Dlsces:tien -,. , (Tabled until the February ~ 1999 Meeting) 2. Zip Code Update V; ~ \1""'/rr J-.c.l ~;:'~'i.-7 -"~r~~ ~\f:::',-".-;_p. i- -,;e::ls""d \-\'itJ.: ~~~ i I ,.....~~ -:-"',"".-;p \/:-~ :,\."""1':'-,"- ,c__, Ct-', d__.<.,__~4.__ ~I...-'___~ _"1_ 1,-,1;-.::::'~. ..J '- ~'....ll ...1,,- Z,P Cuu..... '-' c ';1--' ,1...._ ;Cf-'! J- ! .......\ .',..-, :d -;..., '-0 i..-.I""'~-'d ,:l""-- .--e-'-.....;-.. -' ~....-. ~~ ~_I ,-'.-....... -- -,~~--,.....,.. -.~_..... t......... dSK,c:'\!~~ sa: :'I:e,- nl:::I..-'....::: . _ Icore:, I~LCt..:\,e 1:'..)(';1 L:le i..ctC011'-'lnC C.-,il:~CI:1 C:Le;'" Si,e , " r;ot:ced on her- t2:eDr,ore bill that the mer:"': COllected fer the city tax a:"ej f,ar-:ci1ise Fee , ' was ove,:" 51.30. Vice ~'lay~r Jask:e...vicz stated that the people affected by the new Zip code aiso have telephone numbers reflecting a city other than BOYr'"',ton Beach. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz asked the telephone re~resentat;ve where the monel is gcing and is it going to Boynton Beach or Lake \Northl The representative did not k~O\N, Vice r-1a'!Gr Jask;ewicz requested the phone company research this. Vice 1\1aycr Jaskiewicz a:so requested that the pr!or;e numbers s;1ould be changed to reflect that these people live in Boynton Beach and the representative stated that might be diffcult to do. ,Vice 1\1ayor Jaskiewicz stated there are approximately 4,000 phores in this area. At a cost of $1.30 per phone, this is a matter that should be pursued, B. Authorizing a public/private partnership pilot program for improving landscaping and/or signage on property which is nonconforming (Proposed Resolution No, R99-05) Vice i"1ayor Jaskie',vicz stated that after the last meeting, rv1r. Sugerman condensed a lot of the information including the application blank from several pag>:'~ to one page. Vice Mayor Jask:ewicz stated there is money available for the project to begin immediately and proposed that the same amount of funds that was put into the fa~ade program be put into this program, which was $30,000. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz informed the Commission that the first big project, which included landscaping, irrigation and other portions of the project would be borne by the property owner. The only portion of the project that involved the City was assisting the applicant in applying to the DOT for a curb cut and some assistance in getting water to his property. The property owner is assuming all of the cost for the installation of an irrigation system and the landscaping. The only cost that could be taken from the fund would be assuming the capitalization fee for the instailation of an irrigation meter. Motion Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz moved that $30,000 in funds designated for these purposes be set aside for use in these projects in the CRA area only. Motion seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Tillman. 33 ~EETING MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSiON BOYNTON BEACH, FLORlD,A JANUARY 19,1999 Commiss:oner Derahan inquired if t:-1e funds 'v'iere CRA funds, Vice i"1ayor Jask:e,\;icz 5~at2d they ~Nou'd be CR;\ funds and vVould be C2s:gn2ted onlY For improvements in the CRA area, i"1a'lGr Pro Tem Tillri2'l as:<~:j Ct\i >1a::2::-=:- 'S::'is :F trie CRA ''';c,~:d have to reCCi,l,s-:e , ' - to approve this and co 'he ha'/2'T,C:iies fer this, City fv1ara;er Willis responded yes to bot:1 ques~:cr,s. ,"'lotion carried 5-0, rvlayor Taylor stated that the revie','.,'2r for the epplicants needs to be determined. Vice rvla,/or Jaskie'/,icz stated that the Ad Hoc Landscape Committee had sugr;ested that ore or tw'o members would be involved ;n the revle't' ;)rocess in conjunction w;th staff. , J Mayer Taylor felt that the ?Ianning and Development Board should revie'N the projects, rather than creating another review board. f"'r. Rumpf informed the Commissioners that the projects are mostly projects dealing with minor changes that would not require site plan approval and that most of the projects would be eligible for minor site plan process, which is done through the permitting system. Mr. Rumpf was under the impression that the committee intended to have staff review the projects. Vice f"1aycr Jask:ewicz noted that these are non- conforming properties and that the Planning and Development Board deals with code issues. These projects require flexibility and thet staff is aware of the procedure and it would be more expeditious to follow the review process suggested by fV1r. Rumpf. Mayor Pro Tern Tillman raised concerns that some property ownerS might try to circumvent the system. Vice Mayor Jaskie'.vicz stated that the properties have already been identified and there are approximately 123 non-conforming properties with regard to fa~ade and landscape improvements in the City. Ms. Heyden identified these properties. Mr. Rumpf stated that uses not allowed by the zoning district would be allowed. Also, any major modifications of a building would not be allowed without site plan review. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz stated the intent of the program is to address landscaping and slgnage and to make these properties more aesthetically pleasing. Commissioner Denahan stated that during many of the Ad Hoc Committee meetings waiving fees was discussed. Commissioner Denahan inquired if there would be a limit on the dollar value an applicant would be eligible for. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz was going 34 MEETING MiNUTES REGULAR CITY COMMiSS:ON BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 19,1999 to suggest a r:a;<''-71um of 52,000, Vic? iv1aycr Jas~;e'.v;cz stated tris prograi:i wc\...ld only ex::st until the ordinarce takes effect 'l.;~en eier/one has to COrip:Y. This ;Jrcg:-am is an incuceme.1t to get the peopie cn boaid. Vice i'v1ayor Jask;e',',:cz stated ti"'at no major corporat;cns 'liould be given any incentives and the funds are inte:-:ded for the sma:: businesses in the Citv. I ~1 - I ',.... , ".. ." ~1 - 1 - I' a'ycr i ay.or aS~,2-...J r,Gw ~a;-iY people ra'i? LO a~prove tne plars, I' a'lcr I c/,cr "e,t t'" ..~-- -, 'r'-, - ~ ,r, -~d" ,..,-....'- ,I - -, h ',-l - ~ .~ ..;.." ,..,' -- ' ':: ,1al. a SlCr7" p\.jS,~:uil, cS '-,0r-C::c LO a ",d' ~I\..U ar per::>on, S, Gl.;lw :::pprv\i~ ~"e f-01a, :: c-:C ;1 citizens 'Nere to serle en the committeE; they should own conformir,g prO~>2~/, not non-conformity' property with regard to decision making, City i'v1anager Willis suggested leaving it under the supeniis:on of her office to deFine how the application method should be hardled, City ~lanager 'Ni!is suggested ~he program should be :.Jncer the direction of Dale Sugerman s;nce it is sirri;ar to t:--'e City's fa~ade program. i'v1ayor Taylor did not Feei that the decision ma~ing should be left to one person. Commiss:oner Denaha~ stated she would like to see the program becorr-.:: successful and thanked Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz for her wonderful efforts in formulizing this program. Commissioner Denahan proposed that the Commissioners consider having a landscape and signage committee to review the projects since these are businesses who are voluntarily participating. Vice i'vlayor Jaskiewicz stated that staff has the expertise to provide assistance and should be the ones to review the projects. Mr. Sugerman thanked Vice i'vlayor Jaskiewicz for acknowledging his simplificat:on of the process for applying to participate in the program. Mr. Sugerman stated he wrote the program to allow the current process to remain in place and gives the City Commission the exception rule. Mr. Sugerman explained that an applicant who wished to improve their non-conforming property now has a process that is cumbersome and burdensome and in many cases physically impossible. Mr. Sugerman stated his program allows the applicant to bring in their non-conForming property and their proposed improvements. Staff would look at it and if staff after looking at the application feels it makes sense and the City should participate, it would be written up and presented to the Commission for approval. This gives the Commission the same approval process of any other site plan. City Attorney Cherof stated this is the method used for approving grants for the Neighborhood Improvement Program. The Commissioners were informed that they approve every single fa<;ade grant. rvlr. Sugerman stated this would avoid creating another committee and keep the process simple. 35 MEETING MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMr\!ISSIO~ BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 19, 1999 Commissioner Titcomb aSKed at what ;:;oir.t dur'ng t;~e process would staff or the Commissicn dete:-iT1;ne a project needs ~'J go through the Planning and Deve:cpmer,t Boa:-d precess, ~lr. Suger;-r;an stated he ',\;as ~nS\Jre on this question and that he :,vrote the srograiil for the Direc:or of De';e:ccrr,e:;t to ceordirate the orojects, ,- , , oJ r'v1a,/cr Tayrer inq'jired if trere s;;owfd be a methcd to ceter,....,.,;~ing how i:Lch n-~cre-i WOGld fund a par:icu!ar project and does the Ccmr,ission need to set a fgve. ~lr, Suge:-rnan stated that the program is w<tten that ~here is a contract betAeen the parties and the contract will delineate the obligations of the appiicant and the City, ~lr. Sugerman said that the City Commiss:cn shouid er.dorse each contract, tvlr, Sugerman stated that the Vice Mayor was suggesting a cap at 52,000. Ma'/or Tayler noted that since staff will rC'/ie'.,v each project and eacr, ,..;roject w!11 be brought beFore the Commission for apprcval", the Commiss:on could make the dec:s:cn at that time and a cap would not be necessary. Vice ~1ayor Jask:ewicz pcir:ted out tha: the participant would have to match any grant given by the City. C. CRA Meeting Dates Commissioner Denahan stated that at the CRA meeting of November 6, 1998, Commissioner Titcomb inquired jf the CRA meeting should be included before or after every Commission meeting. City r'v1anager Willis suggested that the CRA could meet every off-vVednesday, when there is no Commission meeting, and there would be a CRA Commission meeting on the first Wednesday after the first Commission meeting of the month. Commissioner Denahan asked if this was the consensus. Commissioner Denahan objected to a February 10th meeting. i\-layor Taylor suggested that the meetings be called as required. Mayor Taylor stated that the February 10th meeting is necessary since there are items that are coming back to the CRA at that meeting. Mayor Taylor asked Commissioner Denahan if she was unable to attend the February 10th meeting to which she replied she could not. After discussion, it was determined that the meeting would remain at Wednesday, February 10th. Attorney Cherof stated that Resolution No. 99-05 needs to be approved. Motion Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz moved for approval of Resolution No. R99-05. Motion seconded by Commissioner Titcomb. Motion carried 5-0. 36 MEETING MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 19, 1999 III. OTHER: ~Jcne XIV. ADJOURNMENT: Trere being no further bt....s;ress to ccrr;c beore the City Commiss:on, the ~c2: r,~ properly adjourr:ed at 10:25 p.m. CITY OF BOYi\lTON BEACH rv1ayor Vice rv1ayor Mayor Pro Tern Tillman ATTEST; City Clerk -6...:-_ hd, ,~, )~ Recording Secretary (four tapes) Commissioner , - j~',,--c.. ~ u~ .~ Commissioner 37 MEETING MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMIS~lvN BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA DECEMBER 15, 1998 Mr. Bulent Kastarlak, Director of Development stated he was a 38 year resident of the Boston area an~ is familiar with the John F. Kennedy School of Government since its inception. Mr. Kastarlak stated being accepted for the seminar is a great honor and a privilege and that Ms. Willis was selected among many candidates not only nationally, but also worldwide. Mr. Kastarlak stated his Department has benefited from Ms. Willis' attendance at the seminar through an exchange of ideas and opinions. Commissioner Jamie Titcomb requested to read a statement into the public record, which is attached in its entirety to the minutes of the meeting. In summary, Commissioner Titcomb said the following: .:. Commended the work that the Mayor and Commissioners have accomplished together including citywide community policing, re-invigorating the central business district and revitalizing the older neighborhoods. .:. A Community Appearance Code was passed and people are taking pride in their neighborhoods. .:. The Boynton Marina Project is beginning. .:. The CRA has been expanded and the City is ready to move, forward into the next Century. .:. We have had an opportunity to participate in the Visions 20/20 Plan. Boynton Beach is on the move. Commissioner Titcomb further stated: .:. That the City is under the excellent management of City Manager Kerry Willis and Boynton Beach is exemplary and fiscally sound. .:. Boynton Beach is emerging into a first-class City. .:. Pointed out all the City's efforts for children including the Children's Museum, Kid's Kingdom Playground, the Math and Science TechnOlogy Magnet Schools, the HeadStart PrcJram and a possible regional children's theater make Boynton Beach a destination for generations to come. Commissioner Titcomb stated he was elected in March 1996 to fill the un-expired term of the Honorable Sid Rosen and he was honored to be selected by the people of Boynton Beach. Commissioner Titcomb announced that he has decided to focus his attention on the personal and professional aspects of his life. Commissioner Titcomb stated he is committed to the 4th District American Advertising Federation and is currently Lieutenant Governor of that Federation and in line for the Governors position. 15 MEETING MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMPt._..iSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA DECEMBER 15, 1998 Commissioner Titcomb announced that he has decided to place his political talents and opportunities on hold and that he plans to relinquish his seat at the end of his term in March 1999. Commissioner Titcomb stated he wc~ld not seek another term in office as Commissioner nor run for the Mayor1s seat. Commissioner Titcomb thanked the people of Boynton Beach for allowing him to serve them and it has been one of the most rewarding opportunities of his life. Mayor Taylor said he could not begin to state how this City has been rewarded with the talents of Commissioner Titcomb and he has been a valuable member of the Commission. Mayor Taylor stated that the door will always be open for Commissioner Titcomb to come back and that he would be glad to support him in any way possible. Chris Francois, owner of the Dolphin Lounge commented on how nice the Christmas banners and Christmas lights along Boynton Beach Boulevard and Federal Highway looked. Ms. Francois inquired if they would be extended to both sides of the road. ~ Ms. Willis stated the electrical hOOk-ups for the other side of the road are being worked on. . Mayor Taylor asked if anyone else wished to address the Commission. Hearing none, closed the public audience. VII. PUBUC HEARING A. Project: Agent: location: 7 -Eleven at Grove Plaza Donna West, Carnahan-Proctor & Associates, Inc. Southeast corner of Hypoluxo Road & Lawrence Road Description: Conditional use to build a convenience store with gasoline sales (TABl.ED TO DECEMBER ~s'" MEETrNGj Postponed at the request of the Applicant. B. Project: Agent: Owner: location: Description: Steak 'n Shake James Harlow Florida Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. Steak 'n Shake Southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Winchester Park Boulevard Request for conditional use approval to construct a 3,690 square foot drive-thrufsit down restaurant on 1.08 acres 16 ,- . r' . -. .~ .... , FOlm #0941 08195 DATE ISSUED: March 26, 1998 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE STANDARD GENERAL PERMIT NO. SO-03982-P PERMITTEE: ALICE FAY AND WALTER JANKE 2742 NE 4TH STREET POMPANO BEACH, FL 33062 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SERVING ~ ACRES OF AN~9 ACRE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS GROVE PLAZA. PROJECT LOCATION: PALM BEACH COUNTY, SECTION 7 TWP 45S RGE 43E PERMIT DURATION: Five years from the date issued to complete construction of the surface water management system as authorized herein. See attached Rule 40E-4.321. Florida Administrative Code. This is to notify you of the District's agency action concerning Notice of Intent for Permit Application No. 971119-3, dated November 19, 1997. This action is taken pursuant to Rule 40E-l.603 and Chapter 40E-40 , Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). Based on the information provided, District rules have been adhered to and an Environmental Resource General Permit is in effect for this project subject to: 1. Not receiving a filed request for a Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, administrative hearing, "" 2. the attached General Conditions, 3. the attached 9 Special Conditions, and 4. the attached 6 Exhibit(s). Should you dbject to these conditions, please refer to the attached "Notice o~. Rights" which addresses the procedures to be followed if you desire a public hearing or other review of the proposed agency action. Please contact this office if you have any questions concerning this matter. If we do not hear from you in accordance with the "Notice of Rights," we will assume that you concur with the District's action. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HERE Y CERTIFY that a "Notice of Rights" has been mailed to the Permittee (and the person 1i ted in the attached distribution list) no later than 5:00 p.m. on this 26th 0 March, 1998, in accordance with Section 120.60(3), Florida Statutes. terhouse, P.E. urface Water Man~Q~~e~t each Servi ce Cenfer" 11.\; CC;",' i l ,,' ,J . : ~ ,.! .,.i; 1/1/ If I '(fl if; 11 tr!///?F I 11 :. J-j"" "Il . '\~ r: Ii: . :.. ,t );jj.J ,) " lifu .:J'-.::lbU"U'" " :U J ','---. L'JL!!J ..-...-...------ ------- Certified Mail No. Z 179 707 038 Enclosures ... --~...._--",._, ,- . .r .... . ~ "-i ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT CHAPTER40E-4 (10/95) 40E-4.321 Duration of Permits (1) Unless revoked or otherwise modified the duration of an environmental resource permit issued under this chapter or Chapter 40E-40, F.A.C. is as follows: (a) For a conceptual approval, two years from the date of issuance or the date spedfied as a condition of the permit, unless within that period an application for an individual or standard general permit is filed for any portion of the project. If an application for an environmental resource permit Is filed, then the conceptual approval remains valid until final action is taken on the environmental resource permit application. If the application is granted, then the conceptual approval is valid for an additional two years from the date of issuance of the permit. Conceptual approvals which have no individual or standard general environmental resource permit applications filed for a period of two years shall expire automatically at the end of the two year period. (b) For a conceptual approval filed concurrently with a development of regional impact (DRI) application for development approval (ADA) and a local government comprehensive plan amendment, the duration of the conceptual approval shall be two years from whichever one of the following occurs at the latest date: 1. the effective date of the local government's comprehensive plan amendment. 2. the effective date of the local government development order. 3. the date on which the District issues the conceptual approval, or 4. the latest date of the resolution of any Chapter 120.57, F.A.C., administrative pro~eeding or other legal appeals. (c) For an individual or standard general environmental resource permit, five years from the date of issuance or such amount of time as made a condition of the permit. (d) For a noticed. general permit issued pursuant to Chapter 40,E'400, F.A.C., five years from the date the notice of intent to use the permit Is provided to the District. (2)(a).. Unless prescribed by special permit condition, permits expire automatically according to the timeframes indicated in this rule. If application for extension is made in writing pursuant to subsection (3), the permit shall remain in full force and effect until: 1. the Governing Board takes action on an application for extension of an individual permit, or 2. staff takes action on an application for extension of a standard general permit. (b) Installation of the project outfall structure shall not constitute a vesting of the permit. (3) The permit extension shall be issued provided that a permittee files a written request with the District showing good cause prior to the expiration of the permit. For the purpose of this rule, good cause shall mean a set of extenuating circumstances outside of the control of the permittee. Requests for extensions, which shall include documentation of the extenuating drcumstances and how they have delayed this project, will not be accepted more than 180 days prior to lhe expiration date. (4) Substantial modifications to Conceptual Approvals will extend the duration of the Conceptual Approval for two years from the date of issuance of the modification. For the purposes of this section, the term 'substantial modification" shall mean a modification which is reasonably expected to lead to substantially different water resource or environmental impacts which require a detailed review. (5) Substantial modifications to individual or standard general environmental resource permits issued pursuant to a permit application extend the duration of the permit for three years from the date of issuance of the modification. Individual or standard general environmental resource permit modifications do not extend the duration of a conceptual approval. (6) Permit modifications issued pursuant to subsection 40E-4.331(2)(b), F.A.C. (letter modifications) do not extend the duration of a permit. (7) Failure to complete construction or alteration of the surface water management system ant: obtain operation phase approval from the District within the permit duration shall require a new permit authorization in order to continue construction unless a permit extension is granted. Spedfic authority 373.044, 373.113 F.s. Law Implemented 373.413, 373.416, 373.419, 373.426 F.S. History-New 9'3' 81. Amended 1,31,82, 12,1.82, R:Jrmerly 16K-4.07(4), Amended 7,1,86, 4/20/94, 10-)-95 - Form 0637 ' 3/96 south Florida Water Management District GENERAL PERMIT NOTICE OF RIGHTS This Natic. of Rights is in,.nd.d to in'a,m"h. ,ecipient at mo .dministr.tiv. .nd judici.1 ,.yi.w which m.y b. .y.ilabl. .. maod"ed bV saetian 120.60IJI. Aarida St.M", B. .dyisad th.. .Ithaugh this natie. is in,.nd.d to b. comp,.hensiv.. tho ,.vi.w p,aeedu'.. s.tlonh h."in h.vo b..n tho subjeel of judici., cansuyctian .nd int.rp,eution which m.y .Hoct tho .dmillisu.tivo of judicial "yiew ayail.blo. R.cipi.nts a" the,%,. .dvisad 10 bocom. f.mili.r with Chopt... 120 .nd J73. Aorida Statut.s. .nd tho judici.1 int.rp'.totion 0' 'ho provi5ions of thue chap tors. 1. "a substan,i.lly oHoctod po..on obi.cts to tho st.H's ,.cammond.tian. th" po..on hos tho right to ,.qu.".n .dminis""iy. h..ring an tho p,apas.d .g.ncy .ction. Th. subst.nti.lly ,".ct.d po..on m.y "quast ai'ho' . fa"".1 a' .n inta""al hooring. .. so, lanh below. Failur. to comply with tha prescribed tima periods shan constitute. waiv.r of tho right.to . huring. 2. If. subst.ntially aHoctad p.<san b.li.y.. . g.nuin. issu. of <n...ri.1 f.ct is in disput.. .that.p.rsan m.y "quost a la,m.1 hwing pursuant to section 120.5701. Aorida Statutes. by filing II potition not tator than: .. IF NOTICE OF THE APPLICATION WAS PUBLlSHEO BY THE APPLICANT. within faurt..n 1141 d.ys alt.' mOIling 01 ". proposod agoncy action or b. IF NOTICE OF THE APPLICATION WAS NOT PUBLISHED. within fourteen (14' days ..hot receipt of utuoil notice. Tho ,.quost fa' . sactian 120.57111. F.S.. fa"".1 hooring mull comply with tho "quitom.nts 01 Rul. 40E.\.52\. Flo"d. Admini.....iY. Cad.. . copv 01 which is .nach.d. P.titions .,. d..mod fil.d upon ,.c.ipt by tho Oi...ict. F.ilu'. 'a ,ub",n,i.lly camplv with ,h. p,ayisians 01 Rul. 40E. \.521. Ao,id. Admini.....iy. Cod.. sh.1I constiM. . waiyo< 0' ,ho ,igM to . t 20.57(\ I h...in9. ". p.titian la' .dmini...atiy. he..ing is not timolv filed. ,he stOWS p,apas.d .g.ncy will .utam"ic.IIV m"u" ,nta fin.1 agoncy action. J. If a substan,ially a".cted pe<san believes th" no issues 01 m.teriallact... in dispu'.. th.. person may 'eQuest an inlo,m.1 h,,"ng pursuant (0 saction 12a.~ 7(2), F.S., by filing a petition for hearing not later than: a. IF NOTICE OF TI1E APPLICATION WAS PUBLISHED BY THE APPLICANT, within lourto.n 1141days ahe' mailing of th. proposed agency action or b. IF NOTICE OF THE APPLICATION WAS NOT PUBLISHED. wi'hin lourt..n 1141 days aft.r r.c.ipt of actu.1 notic.. A "Qu.st fo' inla,m.1 h.aring shall bo consid.,.d as a waiy.r of tho right to "qu.st a fo""al saction 120.57111. F.5.. h."ing. A "quest fo' a ..ction \ 20.57111 F.S.. lo""al h...ing no' in substantial complianc. with th. provisions 01 ",I. 40E.l.521. F,A,C.. may b. conside,ed bV th. District as a 'equ.st for info""al hearing. If a petition for administrative heoring is not timely filed. th, stOff's proposed agcncy action will automatically mature into final agency action. 4. Puosu.nt to soCljon 3 7J, \ 14, Ao,ida Statut.s. a party to ,he p,oceeding b.law m.y s..k ,.yi.w of a Rnal O,dor ,ende"d on tho p.rmi' application b.fo'. th. Land and w.w Adjudicata'y Commission. as p,ovid.d tha,ein. Royi.w undor this "cuon i, initi",d by filing a "qu.st fa> ..yi.w with th. Land and Wator Adiudic..otY Commission and s.tYing a copy of th. D.p.nm,nt of' Enyi,onm.ntal P,ot.ction and any p"son n.m.d in tho orde' within 20 days .ft., "nd.ring olth. District's Ord". HOW'~;" wh,n tho o,d.' to b. ,.yi.w.d h.. stat. wid. a' ,.gional significanc.. as d...""med by th. Land .nd W.t.r Adjudicatory Commission within 60 doys aftel ,eceipt of a 'equest for ,.vi.w. ,h. commission may .ccept a "quest la, ,.yi.w ',am anv olf.cted peoson wi,nin 30 days of", :h' lCod.ring of ,h. ord... R.yi.w undor section J7J.l p. Aorida Statutes. is limit.d sof.ly to a d.telmin"ion 01 cons'stoncy with tho proYisions and pu,poses 01 Chapt.' 37J. Florida Statut". This ,...iew is app.II". in natu'. .nd limil,d 10 Ihe rocord belo...... 5. A party who is advorsoly aff.c..d bV fin.1 .g.ncy .etian on tho p..mit .pplicat..n is .ntitl.d '0 jodic'.' "vi.w in In. O","C' Coun 01 App.al puosu.nt 10 "ction 120.68. Ao,id. Statu"s. .. p,ovid.d thore,n. R.yi.w und., S.c,ion \ 20.68. Fio"d. S""ul" ,n <no Ois..ict Court of App..1 is inili...d by filing. p.,ilion ,n th. .PP,opri... Oi"rie, Court at App..1 in .ceo,d.nc. w"h Flo"d' rul. 01 appellate Proccdure 9.110. The Notice 01 Appul must be liled .....Ithin 30 days of the final agency action. 6. Section 373.617(21. Aorida StatuteS, provides: Any peoson substanti.lly affected by a linal ac'ion of any .gency with ,.sp.ct to. p.""it may seck ,eyiew within 90 d.yS ot ,ho ..nd.ring of such d.cision .nd ..qu.st monotary d.m.ges .nd othe' ,.Ii.I in th. ci,cuit court in th. judicial ,i,cuit in which th. .H.ct.d p'op.rty is locat.d; howovor. ci,cuit court ,.yi.w sh.1I b. confiood sol.IV to d.'.mVnin~ -h.thor r;'al ag.ncy .clion is an un,...on.bl. ..o,cis. 0' th. "....s polic. pow" conSlituting . taking without jus, componsation. ".vi.w 01 lin.1 .g,ncy .ct,on lor th. pu",os. of d."",,ining wh.th.' th. action is in acco,danc. with .xisring Sl..utoS 0' ",I.s.nd b."d on compon.n' subSl.n,i.1 evidence shall proceed in accordance .....ith Chepter 120. 7. Ploo.. bo .dyisod that .Xhaustion 01 administratiy. lem.dias is g.oo..lly . p,.,.quisit. to appoolto th. Disuict Court 01 App..1 0' the s..king of Circuit Court ,eyi.w 0' final ag.ncy action by th. Ois..ict on ,h. p.rmit application. Th.'. ..c. howev.'. e,ceptioOS to tho ..h.ustian "qui,.mont. Th. appliean' is adyi"d to consultth. cas. law as to th. ,.qui"m.nts 01 ..h.ustian "c,ptions. .. { 1 ';..;' \wi 40E.l.$Z I Initiation or Formal Proceedings n J (nitiation of formal proceedings shan be made by petition to the District. The term petition n used herein includes any' appnCltion or other document which expresses. request for tormal proceedings. each petition should be printed. typewritten or Othetwiu duplicated in legible form on white paper or standard fogal size. Unless printed. the impression chan b. on ono sida or the paper only an 'nes ,hall be double-spaced Ind indented. (2.1 All Pllltitions filed under thuo rules shall contain: C.I The ".me and addross of tho District and tho District"s fiI. or (dentific.tion numbor. if known; CbJ Tho nama and address of the petitioner or petitione,s; . (e) An explanation or how each potitioner's substantial interests will be effected by the District's determination; (dJ A statement of when and how petitioner received notice of the District's decision or intent to render I decision; (eJ A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If thore ere none. tho petitioner must so indicate: en A concise statement of tho ultimate facts which petitioner believes entitle petitioner to the reli.f sought as well as the ru:es and statutes which support petitioner's claim for roliof: f;: A demand for the re:iof to which the petitio not dooms himself entitJed; and (hi Other information which the petitioner contends is material. (31 Upon receipt of a petition for formal proceodings, tho Offico of Counsel shall review tho petilion for compliance with subsection '21. The Board~shall accopt those petitions in substantial compliance therewith, which havo been timely filed, which establish that the petitionerls a substantially affected party, and which state a dispute which is within the jurisdiction of the District to "'solvo. If accepled, lhe Board shan designate the presiding officer of the administrative hearing, The District shall promptly give written notice to a!1 par.ies of the action tal:.en on the petition, and shall state with particularity its reasons therefor, (41 If a petition is filed that does not substantially comply with the requirement of subsection (2) of this section, the Distric1 shall issue an order dismissing the petition with leave to tile an "mended petition complying with tho requirements of this rulo within the time period designated in the ordor. If an amended potition complying with this rule is not filed with the ~istrict Clerk within the designated time period, the petitioner"t/ight to a processing under Section 120.57. Aorida Statutes, is waived. (51 If a varid petition is filed. with the consent of all p,arties and upon a showing of good cause, Board action on the petition pursuant to Section 120.57(1 Hb) shall b. waived. -Good cause'" shall mUn a set at circumstences unforeseen end outside of the control of the person reQuosting the waivar. (61 When IS vafid petition for administrative hearing has been filed, the Board action shall defer consideration of the maner pending the completion of the adrninistrl!tive hearing end the submittal of e recommended order, end any exceptions to that order. 01 If the Board designates e Hearing Officer usigned by tho Division of Administrative Heerings u the presiding officer, the District Crerl:: shari forward the petition and all relevlSnt materials fired with the District to the Division of Administrative Hearings. and shall notify all parties of iu action. Specific AU1hority 120.53, 373.044, 373.113 F.S. Law Implemented 120.53(11, 120.57. 373.113 F.S. History _ new 9-3-81, formerly 16K.109.(tJ.16K.1.112ItJ ..(31. 15K.l.12. Amended S.II.9J. . '. . ~ ~ GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. ALL ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS SET FORTH IN THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AS APPROVED BY THIS PERMIT. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE PERMITTED ACTIVITY AND THE CONDITIONS FOR UNDERTAKING THAT ACTIVITY SHALL CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THIS PERMIT AND PART IV, CHAPTER 373, F.S. 2. THIS PERMIT OR A COPY THEREOF, COMPLETE WITH ALL CONDITIONS, ATTACHMENTS, EXHIBITS, AND MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE KEPT AT THE WORK SITE OF THE PERMITTED ACTIVITY. THE COMPLETE PERMIT SHALL BE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT THE WORK SITE UPON REQUEST BY THE DISTRICT STAFF. THE PERMITTEE SHALL REQUIRE THE CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW THE COMPLETE PERMIT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE ACTIVITY AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT. 3. ACTIVITIES APPROVED BY THIS PERMIT SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A MANNER WHICH DOES NOT CAUSE VIOLATIONS OF STATE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. THE PERMITTEE SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR EROSION AND POLLUTION CONTROL TO PREVENT VIOLATION OF STATE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO AND DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND PERMANENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. TURBIDITY BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE THE POSSIBILITY OF TRANSFERRING SUSPENDED SOLIDS INTO THE RECEIVING WATERBODY EXISTS DUE TO THE PERMITTED WORK. TURBIDITY BARRIERS SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AT ALL LOCATIONS UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND SOILS ARE STABILIZED AND VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. ALL PRACTICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES AND SPECIFICATIONS DESCRIBED IN CHAPTER 6 OF THE FLORIDA LAND DEVELOPMENT. MANUAL; A GUIDE TO SOUND LAND 'AND WATER MANAGEMENT (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL. REGULATION, 1988), INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN RULE 40E-4.091, F.A.C. UNLESS A PROJECT-SPECIFIC EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN IS APPROVED AS PART OF THE PERMIT. THEREAFTER THE PERMITTEE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE BARRIERS. THE PERMITTEE SHALL CORRECT ANY EROSION OR SHOALING THAT CAUSES ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE WATER RESOURCES. 4. THE PERMITTEE SHALL NOTIFY THE DISTRICT OF THE ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION START DATE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE THAT THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED. AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ACTIVITY AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERMIT, THE PERMITTEE-SHALL SUBMIT TO THE DISTRICT AN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT CONSTRUCTION COMMENCEMENT NOTICE FORM NO. 0960 INDICATING THE ACTUAL START DATE AND THE EXPECTED COMPLETION DATE. 5. WHEN THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION WILL EXCEED ONE YEAR, THE PERMITTEE SHALL SUBMIT CONSTRUCTION STATUS REPORTS TO THE DISTRICT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS UTILIZING AN ANNUAL STATUS REPORT FORM. STATUS REPORT FORMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING JUNE OF EACH YEAR. '-" '-' 6. WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMITTED ACTIVITY, THE PERMITTEE SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF COMPLETION AND CERTIFICATION BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR OTHER APPROPRIATE INDIVIDUAL AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW, UTILIZING THE SUPPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION/CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATION FORM NO.0881. THE STATEMENT OF COMPLETION AND CERTIFICATION SHALL BE BASED ON ONSITE OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION OR REVIEW OF ASBUILT DRAWINGS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING IF THE WORK WAS COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH PERMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THIS SUBMITTAL SHALL SERVE TO NOTIFY THE DISTRICT THAT THE SYSTEM IS READY FOR INSPECTION. ADDITIONALLY, IF DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED DRAWINGS ARE OISCOVERED DURING THE CERTIFICATION PROCESS, THE CERTIFICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE APPROVED PERMIT DRAWINGS WITH DEVIATIONS NOTED. BOTH THE ORIGINAL AND REVISED SPECIFICATIONS MUST BE CLEARLY SHOWN. THE PLANS MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED AS "ASBUI L T" OR "RECORD" DRAWING. ALL SURVEYED DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A REGISTERED SURVEYOR. 7. THE OPERATION PHASE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE: UNTIL THE PERMITTEE HAS COMPLIED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CONDITION (6) ABOVE, HAS SUBMITTED A REQUEST FOR CONVERSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT FROM CONSTRUCTION PHASE TO OPERATION PHASE, FORM NO.0920; THE DISTRICT DETERMINES THE SYSTEM TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS; AND THE ENTLTY APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 9.0 AND 10.0 OF THE BASIS OF REVIEW FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICATIONS WITHIN tHE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT - AUGUST 1995, ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM. THE PERMIT SHALL NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO SUCH APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ENTITY UNTIL THE OPERATION PHASE OF THE PERMIT BECOMES EFFECTIVE. FOLLOWING INSPECTION AND APPROVAL OF THE PERMITTED SYSTEM BY THE'OISTRICT, THE PERMITTEE SHALL INITIATE TRANSFER OF THE PERMIT TO THE APPROVED RESPONSIBLE OPERATING ENTITY IF DIFFERENT FROM THE PERMITTEE. UNTIL THE PERMIT IS TRANSFERRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 40E-l.6107, F.A.C., THE PERMITTEE SHALL BE LIABLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE PERMIT. 8. EACH PHASE OR INDEPENDENT PORTION OF THE PERMITTED SYSTEM MUST BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PERMITTED PLANS AND PERMIT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE INITIATION OF THE PERMITTED USE OF SITE INFRASTRUCTURE LOCATED WITHIN THE AREA SERVED BY THAT PORTION OR PHASE OF THE SYSTEM. EACH PHASE OR INDEPENDENT PORTION OF THE SYSTEM MUST BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PERMITTED PLANS AND PERMIT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PHASE OR PORTION OF THE SYSTEM TO A LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR OTHER RESPONSIBLE ENTITY. 9. FOR THOSE SYSTEMS THAT WILL BE OPERATED OR MAINTAINED BY AN ENTITY THAT WILL REQUIRE AN EASEMENT OR DEED RESTRICTION IN ORDER TO ENABLE THAT ENTITY TO OPERATE OR MAINTAIN THE SYSTEM IN CONFORMANCE WITH THIS PERMIT, SUCH EASEMENT OR DEED RESTRICTION MUST BE RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS AND SUBMITTED TO THE DISTRICT ALONG WITH ANY OTHER FINAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 9.0 AND 10.0 OF THE BASIS OF REVIEW FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICATIONS WITHIN THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT - AUGUST 1995, PRIOR TO LOT OR UNIT SALES OR PRIOR TO THE COMPLETION OF THE SYSTEM, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. OTHER DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT AND AUTHORITY OF THE OPERATING ENTITY MUST BE FILED WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE WHERE APPROPRIATE. FOR THOSE SYSTEMS WHICH ARE PROPOSED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL ENTITIES, FINAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DOCUMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE DISTRICT WHEN MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE SYSTEM IS ACCEPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENTITY. FAILURE TO SUBMIT THE APPROPRIATE FINAL DOCUMENTS WILL RESULT IN THE PERMITTEE REMAINING LIABLE FOR CARRYING OUT MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PERMITTED SYSTEM AND ANY OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS. ~, 10. SHOULD ANY OTHER REGULATORY AGENCY REQUIRE CHANGES'TO THE PERMITTED SYSTEM, THE PERMITTEE SHALL NOTIFY THE DISTRICT IN WRITING OF THE CHANGES PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION SO THAT A DETERMINATION CAN BE MADE WHETHER A PERMIT MODIFICATION IS REQUIRED. 11. THIS PERMIT DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE NECESSITY TO OBTAIN ANY REQUIRED FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND SPECIAL DISTRICT AUTHORIZATIONS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY ACTIVITY APPROVED BY THIS PERMIT. THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONVEY TO THE PERMITTEE OR CREATE IN THE PERMITTEE ANY PROPERTY RIGHT, OR ANY INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY, NOR DOES IT AUTHORIZE ANY ENTRANCE UPON OR ACTIVITIES ON PROPERTY WHICH IS NOT OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY THE PERMITTEE, OR CONVEY ANY RIGHTS OR PRIVILEGES OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT AND CHAPTER 40E-4 OR CHAPTER 40E-40, F.A.C. 12. THE PERMITTEE IS HEREBY ADVISED THAT SECTION 253.77, F.S. STATES THAT A PERSON MAY NOT COMMENCE ANY EXCAVATION, CONSTRUCTION, OR OTHER ACTIVITY INVOLVING THE USE OF SOVEREIGN OR OTHER LANDS OF THE STATE, THE TITLE TO WHICH IS VESTED IN THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND WITHOUT OBTAINING THE REQUIRED LEASE, LICENSE, EASEMENT, OR OTHER FORM OF CONSENT AUTHORIZING THE PROPOSED USE. THEREFORE, THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY NECESSARY AUTHORIZATIONS FROM THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES PRIOR TO COMMENCING ACTIVITY ON SOVEREIGNTY LANDS OR OTHER STATE-OWNED LANDS. 13. THE PERMITTEE MUST OBTAIN A WATER USE PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING, UNLESS THE WORK QUALIFIES FOR A GENERAL PERMIT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 40E- 20.302(4), F.A.C., ALSO KNOWN AS THE "NO NOTICE" RULE. 14. THE PERMITTEE SHALL HOLD AND SAVE THE DISTRICT HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES,CLAIMS, OR LIABILITIES WHICH MAY ARISE BY REASON OF THE CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REMOVAL, ABANDONMENT OR USE OF ANY SYSTEM AUTHORIZED BY THE PERMIT. 15. ANY DELINEATION OF THE EXTENT OF A WETLAND OR OTHER SURFACE WATER SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE PERMIT APPLICATION, INCLUDING PLANS OR OTHER SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION, SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED BINDING UNLESS A SPECIFIC CONDITION-OF THIS PERMIT OR A FORMAL DETERMINATION UNDER SECTION 373.421(2), F.S., PROVIDES OTHERWISE. 16. THE PERMITTEE SHALL NOTIFY THE DISTRICT IN WRITING WITHIN 30 DAYS OF ANY SALE, CONVEYANCE, OR OTHER TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OR CONTROL OF A PERMITTED SYSTEM OR THE REAL PROPERTY ON WHICH THE PERMITTED SYSTEM IS LOCATED. ALL TRANSFERS OF OWNERSHIP OR TRANSFERS OF A PERMIT ARE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULES 40E- 1.6105 AND 40E-l.6107, F.A.C. THE PERMITTEE TRANSFERRING THE PERMIT SHALL REMAIN LIABLE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS THAT MAY 8E REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF ANY VICLATIONS PRIOR TO THE SALE, CONVEYANCE OR OTHER TRANSFER OF THE SYSTEM. 17. UPON REASONABLE NOTICE TO THE PERMITTEE, DISTRICT AUTHORIZED STAFF WITH PROPER IDENTIFICATION SHALL HAVE PERMISSION TO ENTER, INSPECT, SAMPLE AND TEST THE SYSTEM TO INSURE CONFORMITY WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS APPROVED BY THE PERMIT. 18. IF HISTORICAL OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL ARTIFACTS ARE DISCOVERED AT ANY TIME ON THE PROJECT SITE, THE PERMITTEE SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE DISTRICT SERVICE CENTER. 19. THE PERMITTEE SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DISTRICT IN WRITING OF ANY PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED INFORMATION THAT IS LATER DISCOVERED TO BE INACCURATE. '-') '-" SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. MINIMUM BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATION: 17.3 FEET NGVD. 2. MINIMUM ROAD CROWN ELEVATION: 15 FEET NGVD. 3. DISCHARGE FACILITIES: 1-.5' W X .5' H TRIANGULAR ORIFICE WITH INVERT.AT ELEV. 12.5' NGVD. 16 LF OF 1.25' DIA. CAP CULVERT. . RECEIVING BODY: LWDD L-18 CANAL CONTROL ELEV : 10 FEET NGVD. /10 FEET NGVD DRY SEASON. 4. THE PERMITTEE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CORRECTION OF ANY EROSION, SHOALING OR WATER QUALITY PROBLEMS THAT RESULT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION OF THE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. S. MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENTATION AND/OR TURBIDITY PROBLEMS ARE NOT CREATED IN THE RECEIVING WATER. .. 6... THE'DISTRICT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE THAT ADDITIONAL WATER QUALITY TREATMENT METHODS BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM IF SUCH MEASURES ARE SHOWN TO BE NECESSARY. 7. FACILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE STATED HEREIN SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT AN APPROVED MODfFJCATION OF THIS PERMIT. 8. OPERATION OF THE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF GROVE PLAZA MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC. THE PERMITTEE SHALL SUBMIT A COPY OF THE RECORDED DEED RESTRICTIONS (OR DECLARATION OF CONDOMINIUM, IF APPLICABLE), A COPY OF THE FILED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, AND A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION FOR THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION CONCURRENT WITH THE ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION OF CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION. 9. A PERMIT MODIFICATION WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE INDIVIDUAL PARCELS. PLANS AND CALCULATIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH AND STORAGE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 4. .- R B YRIO E IN c 0 ~ C OJ '" ;;; >- II: () MACKINA Q. :I: :I: >- KEWAN L dd Canal 1..-/ 7 0 ~ 0 0 :D Z U m Z II: ;: 5 - J x <:> .11 ~ ~ NORTH I C y ';:. ~-. >: o c .... :I: l.N.A SOMERSET IAMONDH AD NDOLlER AY WORqlE TE AMBRIDGE PALOMINO ... " 8 " .~- SAPPHIRE ARINER W RB ARO '" E '" :> :I: u '" '" '" ::; B STON AR ESIA PROJECT. LOCATION' ' MBERJACK avi ator Cree 1 T V ~~: ~' '-t,,, ~t.r,. Ci'...., i",r. >-!" . ~ '. .:~.. . ~. -l"":" t~J, "",~!:. ..' "'" ~".:" , .~~ 1~' ~~. ~t f.- ~; . "!l 4f -:~ ~;. !rl;' ~"; .~l. t:f ~ .~'-1. I ; ~ I'~ ~ :;~ . ";' .. ". ,~ " ~~~ ~}-! ~ .:. >. ., ~, ... ", ~ r :...: ;., . .... ?:' 'r: jg ',. ~; r II III - ',. II I'; ,....... 1;11 .:,..'..'1'" I ~:.' .,':<-':' dd"] .' ' , 1j1 , I ,'::< , :;,: ! .J ,", I 1 \ J T-'~ II ' Iii! i~ .'\ !if. ,.' " ~ ..,- .. .. I , , Ii t Si. t . p I,; ... in w " " ~ .. 1 It 11 '?"~-: :.~ :: . " ~.. I , 1.1 r , ~~;:~~ . '."! '11 It, ... 'j I w u . , " , I ~ .. "" !.~ ~~I , \ l" ... I w "i u " ~ .. . _.~ -- . . ail' <.J .1 , 1 1 ~ 5;!! :z: ---- ",!ill " I . Q .... o <>: ; ";;;.:;w 1 Ir i '!I. J '1 " J' . '. " - " " I .ll I' " l I I I I, !l I .lll! Illl, Il:l II! I I'" .1 . 11111 11 J 11 I l! I .' f _ _ ~ . ~ ~ " . w . z. z . ~ - <', i '" " '~ . ~ ~~ : :~:~l\; '.~ .'. ~. ", (:.: ~:.;.~+..!.),.~;,:. '~'..'- :":. ,..' " . .... ::.~;~;'.:' ';:1: _~ ' ..< < ' :..- . ~<' -, < . (:.. ...\:".: w ~ ... ... 4 = ~ 'I z 4 Q I ~ 4 ~ W ~ 1; ~ :> ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ . ~\. ~~: :f:'; ;:i; ; ; ; ji ;.: .,' :''t I 1,1...' .. ilj; 1 ~:J~ ....jll.' 141.1 -I!.I;', lil"'" ~ ~1il , t' - <j I, !i I : i I I I ," ; j , ~ . j ~ Ii ~ : i i! . !'i 1'- i I" j\ u H H it -' Ii' :; i) t- :n ~ in :z: ..... ;;; 1 i-!! -c ,-- = j1 %: ... U ':"~, to- ~~j ~ '0' .:: .. ~. .' ;' :-:: :1" ':':. ;~ ~~ :.,,- -. i~ Il1 'j .' {u~ ~r ~ - g '. ~ ;: Z Q ;: U ~ ~ ~ is ~ u ~ I ) w ,. ~ - u ~ - ~ .L . 5 ~ - z o u z o ~ o . z - U' ~. . - u ::( ! , . ! ., ..... . i. n~!. II: ~ :; - W Q 1; ;: I ::: I z. ~ I U I ... . ~ . w' > . ~ . il · . Q ~ ... . w > Q , . .1 I Ii , -I 'Ii Ii II .. = ~ ~ U . p w ~ ... ... . i . ~ , li I ... . ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ G u TOTAL REQ'D. STORAGE EXFILTRATION , PARCEL AREA LESS TRENCH STORAGE TRENCH STORAGE EXFILTRATION PARCEL (ae) @ EL.15.oo (ae-fl) (ac-fl) TRENCH (fl) 'COMMON ROADWAY 1.67 0.97 0.07 76 A 1.20 0.08 0.05 55 B 1.14 0.08 0.05 52 C 0.83 0.06 0.04 38 D'- 1.23 0.08 0.05 56 E 0.88 0.06 0.04 40 F 1..'4 0.08 0.05 52 . GROVE PLAZA BOYNTON BEACH, FL C P Be A PROJECT NO. 950404 SFWMD EXFILTRATION TRENCH DESIGN CALCULATIONS TOTALS: 8.09 1.41 0.35 ill MIN. ROAD CROWN = 15,00 (NGVD) VOL STORAGE@EL 15.00 = VOL. STORAGE IN TRENCH = VOL STORAGE @ EL 15.00 = LESS VOLUME IN TRENCH TOTAL TRENCH LENGTH = TOTAL TRENCH STORAGE = TOTAL SITE AREA = 1.76 ac.ft l!&5 ac.ft 1.41 ac.ft 370 ft 0.35 ac-ft 8.09 ac VOL STORAGE @ EL 15,00 = (1.41ac,ft. 0.g7ac.ft) I (8.09ac - 1.67ac) = PER ACRE (less common roadway) 0.07 ac,ftIac . For the common roadway parcel, exfillration trench may not be used to store water quality. Water quality must be maintained either in lhe first inch as detention or in the first half inch in retention. One inch of detenlion equals 0.67 ac-ft The stage storage volume for the common roadway parcel account for lhe actual roadway plus the dry detention areas. EXFIL TBLXLS PAGE 1 , . .... GROVE PLAZA PERMIT SUMMARY SHEET APPLICATION NUMBER: 971119-3 LOCATION: PALM BEACH COUNTY, S7/T4SS/R43E OWNER: ALICE FAY AND WALTER JANKE ENGINEER: CARNAHAN-PROCTOR & ASSOCIATES INC PROJECT AREA: 1.81 ACRES DRAINAGE AREA: 8.09 ACRES PROJECT USE: COMMERCIAL FACILITIES: 1. PROPOSED: This application is a request for construction and operation of a surface water management system to serve 1.67 acres of an 8.09 acre commercial deve1op~ent which will be constructed in phases. The surface water management system will consist of inlets, culverts and retention areas. A permit modification will be required prior . to construction of the individual parcels. Each parcel will be required to provide exfi1tration.trench and meet the site grading an~ storage assumptions as shown on Exhibit 4. PROJECT LEVEL: DRAINAGE BASIN: C-16 RECEIVING BODY: LWDD L-18 CANAL BASIN DESIGN FREQUENCY: 2SYR-3DAY STORM WATER QUALITY: Retention of the first inch of runoff will be provided within the dry retention areas. The remainder of the water quality required will be provided by the individual parcels (See Exhibit 4). Basin SITE SITE Method .63 acres DRY RETENTION 76 LF EXFILTRATION TRENCH Vol Req'd. (ac-ft) .67 Vol Prov'd (ac-ft) .67 Exhibit C;/J.- . ,-,' ~ GROVE PLAZA PERMIT SUMMARY SHEET Basin SITE DISCHARGE RATE: As shown in the table below, the proposed project discharge is based on the minimum sized bleeder required by Lake Worth Drainage District. Allow Design Disch Method of Disch (cfs) Determination (cfs) 1.1 MINIMUM SIZE BLEEDER 1.1 Design Stage (ft. NGVD) 16.06 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION: . .The '8723 acre project site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Hypo1uxo Road and Lawrence Road in Boynton Beach. The site is highly disturbed and is vegetated mostly with Brazilian pepper and a variety of opportunistic plant species. EXISTING ON SITE UPLAND COMMUNITIES: ID NO 1 TOTAL BIOLOGICAL ACREAGE CONDITION 8.23 N/A COMMUNITY TYPE DISTURBED LANDS COMMUNITY ACREAGE 8.23 TOTAL ON SITE UPLAND ACREAGE: 8.23 ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY: There are no wetlands present at the site. Therefore, adverse impacts to wetlands are not anticipated as a result of the proposed development. The proposed activities have been evaluated for potential secondary and cumulative impacts and to determine if the project is contrary to the public interest. Based upon the proposed project design, the District has determined that the project will not cause adverse secondary or cumulative impacts to the water resources and is not contrary to the public interest. Exhibit ~ . " ..... GROVE PLAZA PERMIT SUMMARY SHEET APPLICABLE LAND USE: The following Land Use Table is an acreage breakdown of the proposed development. This phase refers to the construction of the access road and the dry retention areas only. TOTAL ACRES WTRM ACREAGE PAVEMENT BUILD COVERAGE PERVIOUS TOTAL PROJECT 8.09 .63 4.69 .70 2.07 PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED THIS PHASE 1.81 acres .63 acres 1.18 acres .00 acres .00 acres .' Exhibit 5c... , v DIVISIONAL APPROVAL: NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT /} ',) ,1 . U/lJJ.. ''7\ . .<..."')u- t.,- Anita R. Bain SUR~MA Carlos A. de Roja ENT v GROVE PLAZA PERMIT SUMMARY SHEET DATE: Zk6/1 f DATE: 5/z~/ff Exhibit 6d.