Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE To: donna ~)'1g 954-972-~ Fax: From: jerzy Date: ~ "/I~/q7 Re: Pages: cc: o Urgent o For Review o Please Comment o Please Reply o Please Recyel . ., . . . . . . . . Notes: F1~ R,fW. CA)Htl~S ~~ t7~~ f f/PrN . ....................... CARNAHAN. PROCTOR AND ASSOCIATES, I~\'. OCT 2 I 1991 ill rn@rnow~ Consulting Engineers ' Surveyors ' Planners . Land Development Consul PLANNING ANI) ZONING OEPT. October 21. 1997 Mr. Jerzy Lewicki Pianning Department City of Boynton Beach ] 00 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boymon Beach, FL 33425 HAND DELIVERED RE: GROVE PLAZA: master site plan rectification Dear Mr. Lewicki: Attached please fmd 3 revised prints of the rectitied master site plan for the Groves Plaza project for your revit:'w <lnd approval. The changes which have beea made to the mQster site plan since the last submittal per the COI:::r.ents we received are as iollc'::s: l. A statement that "all utilities are avail:.ble a,",d will be provided by appropriate agencies" has been add.:-d us note #8. 2. Service road along south pOltiOll of prop~rty now indicates eastbound traffic only. 3. Note #7 has been revised ~o state that the landscape plans for the HypuluXG Road median will be s'.l~m:.itted with the :6rs! phase constructed. 4. Ex.isting water a:Id se\-ver mains and propo:':ed connections to this site have been added. 5. Calculations for G1e required p2.rking have be.3n added. o. The building setback perimeter line has been extended to par~llel the perim\::ttr ~f the property Ac.dit~()fially, we have previou::,ly provided you with additional prints of the st(\i"lllwater management plan as well as a traftlc study showing the corrected tfi:1ftic !TluVemc11t arrows. I believe ~hat this addresses all of the comments which I have received. Should you r~quire anything further, please don't hesitate to contact me. Otherwise, I loo~ forward to having this rectification completed. Very tlUly yours. ~C.~ Don:-;,a C. West, P.S.M. r~,llF~:"l Manager \\i~Y!1p\.)hl.'t ''''':I''\\(!c..rm;j\platld\~dbl'rec do..: 6191 West Atlantic Blvd. . P.O. Box 4399 . Margate, FL 33063 ' (954) 972-3959. FAX (954) 972-4178 . Palm Beach (561) 364.0687 Carnahan .Proctor and Associates, Inc, [L[EUU~OO l\vlf 1fOO~~~~DiTiTro[L I I L WE ARE SENDING YOU ~ Attached c:::: Under separate cover via maiL______th Consulting Engineers · Surveyors · Planners Land Development Consultants 6191 West Atlantic Blvd, Margate, Florida 33063 (954) 972-3959 · Fax (954) 972-4178 DATE I JOB "'0 i -----; i ~ ------1 TO , ~ o Shop drawings o Copy of letter ~ Prints [1 Change order c:::: Plans = Samples L COPIES DATE NO, THESE ARE TRANSMITIED as checked below: D For approval ~ For your use ~ As requested Approved as submitted Approved as noted c:::: Returned for corrections c::: Resubmit_copies for approval D Submit_copies for distribution u Return_corrected prints c:::: For review and comment C [j FOR BIDS DUE 19 ~ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS ~rt ~wakr IThlDtJemrol- ran F~ COPY TO SIGNED~Q dD,rJ " enclosures .r. not as noted. kindly notify us at onct!. lJJU City of 'Boynton 'Beacli 100 T.. 'Boynton 'BeJU:ii 'Boukvara p.o. 'BD;t310 'Boynton 'Beach., :Jforitfa 33425-0310 City !J{afl: (561) 375-6000 :Jf4X: (561) 375-6090 '~.~y' September 10, 1997 Mr. Dan Weisberg, Senior Engineer Palm Beach County Traffic Division Department of Engineering and Public Works P.O. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416 Re: Traffic Study: Grove Plaza Southeast comer of Hypoluxo Road and Lawrence Road File No. SBMP 95-001 The enclosed revised traffic study for the proposed Grove Plaza site dated August 27, 1997, prepared by Carnahan-Proctor and Associates, Inc., was received by Planning and Zoning recently for the above referenced application. Please review the enclosed information for conformance with the County's Traffic Performance Standard Ordinance. If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 375-6260, otherwise please send me your written comments/approval to the above address, with a copy of your written response to Al Newbold, Acting Development Department Director also at the same address. Sincerely, ~~-9-~ Tambri J. Heyden, AICP C Planning and Zoning Director TJH:bme cc: Al Newbold, Acting Development Department Director w/attachment Central File S"' projects\Grove Plaza\traffic memo .5'lrruriLa's (jateway to tlU (jul/stream ~@~D\Yl~ Groves Plaza rn SEP 39Jl rn PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. LOCATION 950404.00 SFWMD EXFILTRATION TRENCH DESIGN CALCULATIONS 1) SITE DATA: 2) STAGE ELEVATIONS: Building: Pavement: Lake: Lake Bank: Open Space: Retention: TOTAL AREA: Acreage: 0.700 Ac. 4.690 Ac. 0.000 Ac. 0.000 Ac. 2.700 Ac. 0.000 Ac. 8.090 Ac. Percent: 8.7% 58.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.4% 0.0% 100.0% From: 17.30 14.75 0.00 0.00 14.00 0.00 To: up 16.70 up 0.00 16.70 0.00 Total Pervious: 2.700 33.37% Average Existing Grade: Average Proposed Grade: Ground Water Table: Low Inlet Elevation: 16.00 16.00 11.00 14.75 Total Impervious: 5.390 66.63% 3) EXFILTRATION TRENCH CRITERIA: Length of Trench Provided: 1,115.00 ft. Top of Trench: 13.00 NGVD Bottom of Trench: 9.00 NGVD Pipe Invert: 10.00 NGVD Hydraulic Conductivity: 1.680E-04 cfslft.2 - ft. Head Exfiltration Trench Width: 8.00 ft. Available Soil Storage, SFWMD: 8.18 in. 4) COMPUTE STAGE STORAGE: Stage: Lake: Lake Bank: Pavement: Open Space: Retention: Total: 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.13 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.50 0.00 0.58 15.50 0.00 0.00 0.68 1.13 0.00 1.80 16.00 0.00 0.00 1.88 2.00 0.00 3.88 16.50 0.00 0.00 3.68 3.13 0.00 6.?1 17.00 0.00 0.00 5.98 4.46 0.00 1 0.43 17.50 0.00 0.00 8.32 5.81 0.00 14.13 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.67 7.16 0.00 EXFILSTD.XLS PAGE 1 Groves Plaza LOCATION 950404.00 SFWMD EXFIL TRA TlON TRENCH DESIGN CALCULATIONS 5) WATER QUALITY: Greater of the following (3A. & 38.) Store the first inch for the entire site or the amount of 2.5 times the percentage of imperviousness. A. First Inch: V = 1 in. x Total Area x 1 ft./12 in. Total (Ac.): 8.09 V = (ac-ft) 0.67 B. 2.5 times percent imperv.: 1. Site Area = Total Area - (Lake Area + Bldg. Area) Total (Ac.): Lake: Bldg.: 8.09 0.00 0.70 2. Impervious Area = Site Area - Pervious Area Site (Ac.): Pervious: 7.39 2.70 Imperv.: 4.69 3.2.5 in. x Imperv.lSite x Total Area x 1 ft.l12 in. Imperv.: V=(ac-ft) 4.69 1.07 Therefore, the total required detention is either the First inch or 2.5 times the percent impervious. whichever is greater. The total required detention is: V(t) (ac-ft): V(t) (ac-in): 1.07 12.84 EXFILSTD.XLS PAGE 2 Site (Ac.): 7.39 Groves Plaza LOCATION 950404.00 SFWMD EXFIL TRATION TRENCH DESIGN CALCULATIONS 6) EXFIL TRA TION TRENCH COMPUTATIONS: 1. Length= VI ( Kx((HxW)+(2xHxDu)-(DuxDu)+(2xHxDs)) + (0.000139xWxDu) } for Du > Os Length= VI (Kx((2xHxDu)-(DuxDu}+(2xHxDs)) + (0.000139xWxDu) } for Du < Ds Length= VI (C} Where: (K) (cfslft.2 - ft. Head) = Hydraulic Conductivity: (V) (Ac-in.) = Volume to be Treated: (H) (ft.) = Depth to Water Table: (Low Inlet Elevation - Water Table) Unsaturated Trench Depth: Saturated Trench Depth: Trench Widtl 8.00 ft. (Du) (ft.) = (Ds) (ft.) = (W) (ft.) = V=(Ac-in.) H = (ft.) Du = (ft.) Ds = (ft.) K= 12.84 3.75 2.00 2.00 1.68E-04 2. Required and Proposed length of trench: L=(ft) L=(ft) Storage in Trench: Q L = (ft.) (Required) (Available) V(tr): 0.01163 1103.48 11 03.48 1,115.00 1.08 7) SOIL STORAGE: 1. Avg. Depth to Water Table = Avg. Proposed Grade - Water Level Avg. Grade: Water Level: D=(ft.): 16.00 11.00 5.00 2. Soil Storage (S) = Available Soil Storage x Pervious Area/Total Area (See C-35, SFWMD VoI.IV) Av. Soil St. Pervious: Total (Ac.): S = (in.): 8.18 2.70 8.09 2.73 DATE PRINTED: DATE PREPARED: DATES REVISED: 25-Aug-97 BY: dma EXFILSTD.XLS PAGE 3 Groves Plaza Location 1) SITE DATA: CP&A PROJECT NO. 950404 SFWMD SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS 2) STAGE ELEVATIONS: Percent: From: 8.7% 17.30 58.0% 14.75 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 33.4% 14.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.00 100.0% Building: Pavement: Exfil. Tr.: Lake Bank: Green Lineal: Green Lineal: Green Lineal: TOTAL AREA: ACREAGE 0.70 Ac. 4.69 Ac. 0.00 Ac. 0.00 Ac. 2.70 Ac. 0.00 Ac. 0.00 Ac. 8.09 Ac. To: up 16.70 o 0.00 16.70 0.00 up Total Impervious: 5.39 Average Existing Grade: 16.00 66.63% Average Proposed Grade: 16.00 Lake, Water Table: 11.00 Total Pervious: 2.70 33.37% 3) FLOOD AND RAINFALL CRITERIA: 24 Hour Rainfall: 10 Year 9.00 in. Min. Road Crown (NGVD): 16.10 25 Year 11.00 in. 100 Year 14.00 in. Min. Floor Elev. (NGVD): 17.30 Maximum Available Soil Storage, SFWMD: 8.18 in. 4) COMPUTE STAGE STORAGE: Stage: Pavement: lake Bank: Green Lineal: Exfil. Tr.: Green Lineal: Green Lineal: Total: 13.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 0.00 0.00 1.08 14.50 0.00 0.00 0.13 1.08 0.00 0.00 1.21 15.00 0.08 0.00 0.50 1.08 0.00 0.00 1.66 15.50 0.68 0.00 1.13 1.08 0.00 0.00 2.88 16.00 1.88 0.00 2.00 1.08 0.00 0.00 4.96 16.50 3.68 0.00 3.13 1.08 0.00 0.00 7.89 17.00 5.98 0.00 4.46 1.08 0.00 0.00 11.51 17.50 8.32 0.00 5.81 1.08 0.00 0.00 15.21 18.00 10.67 0.00 7.16 1.08 0.00 0.00 18.90 18.50 13.01 0.00 8.51 1.08 0.00 0.00 22.60 19.00 15.36 0.00 9.86 1.08 0.00 0.00 26.29 19.50 17.70 0.00 11.21 1.08 0.00 0.00 29.99 STAGE_1.XLS PAGE 1 Groves Plaza Location CP&A PROJECT NO. 950404 SFWMD SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS 5) WATER QUALITY: Greater of the following (SA. & 58.) Store the first inch for the entire site or the amount of 2.5 times the percentage of imperviousness. A. First Inch: v = 1 in. x Total Area x 1 ft.l12 in. Total (Ac.): 8.09 v = (ac-ft) 0.67 B. 2.5 Times Percent Impervious: 1. Site Area = Total Area - (Lake Area + Bldg. Area) Total (Ac.): Lake: Bldg.: 8.09 0.00 0.70 Site (Ac.): 7.39 2. Impervious Area = Site Area - Pervious Area Site (Ac.): Pervious: 7.39 2.70 Imperv.: 4.69 3.2.5 in. x Imperv.lSite x Total Area x 1 ft.l12 in. Imperv.: V={ac-ft) 4.69 1.07 C. Total Required Detention: 1. The total required detention is either the first inch or 2.5 times the percent impervious, whichever is greater. The total required detention is: V{O (ac-ft): 1.07 2. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the elevation is: Interpolate Stage between... Interpolate Runoff between... 13.50 14.00 0.00 1.08 Stage: 14.00 3. Allowable discharge thru bleed down device is 1/2" per day of the detention for the total project site. Tot. Ac. 8.09 Ac Ft. 0.34 Allow.CFS 0.17 STAGE_1.XLS PAGE 2 Groves Plaza Location CP&A PROJECT NO. 950404 SFWMD SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS 6) RUNOFF (ZERO DISCHARGE) A. Soil Storage 1. Avg. Depth to Water Table = Avg. Proposed Grade - Water Level Avg. Grade: Water Level: D=(ft.): 16.00 11.20 4.80 2. Soil Storage (S) = Available Soil Storage x Pervious AreafTotal Area (See C-35, SFWMD VoI.IV) Av. Soil St. Pervious: Total (Ae.): 8.18 2.70 8.09 S = (in.): 2.73 B. 100 Yr.-3 Day Storm Event Finished Floor Elevation: 17.30 NGVD 1. Rainfall - 3 Day Duration (P): P72 = P24 x 1.359 P24 = 14.00 in. P72 = 19.03 in. 2. Runoff, Q (in.) Q = {(P - 0.2 x S)^2}/(P + 0.8 x S) P72 (in.): 19.03 S = (in.): 2.73 Q (in.): 16.10 3. Total Runoff Volume, V (ae-ft.) V = Q x Total Area x 1 ft./12 in. a (in.): 16.10 Total (Ae.): 8.09 V=(ae-ft): 10.85 4. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the zero discharge elevation is: Interpolate Stage between... Interpolate Runoff between... 16.50 7.89 17.00 11.51 Stage: 16.91 The proposed Finish Floor Elevation is adequate. STAGE_1.XLS PAGE 3 Groves Plaza Location CP&A PROJECT NO. 950404 SFWMD SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS C. 25 Yr.-3 Day Storm Event 1. Rainfall - 3 Day Duration (P): P72 = P24 x 1.359 P24= P72= 11.00 in. 14.95 in. 2. Runoff, Q (in.) Q = {(P - 0.2 x S)^2}/(P + 0.8 x S) P72 (in.): 14.95 S = (in.): 2.73 Q (in.): 12.11 3. Total Runoff Volume, V (ac-ft.) V = Q x Total Area x 1 ft./12 in. Q (in.): 12.11 Total (Ac.): 8.09 V = (ac-ft): 8.16 4. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the zero discharge elevation is: Interpolate Stage between... Interpolate Runoff between... 16.50 7.89 17.00 11.51 Stage: 16.54 D. 10 Yr.-1 Day Storm Event (Minimum Road Grade) Min. Road Elevation(B.F.1. Site): 16.10 NGVD 1. Rainfall - 1 Day Duration (P): P24 = 9.00 In. 2. Runoff, Q (in.) Q = {(P - 0.2 x S)^2}/(P + 0.8 x S) P72 (in.): 9.00 S = (in.): 2.73 Q (in.): 6.39 3. Total Runoff Volume, V (ac-ft.) V = Q x Total Area x 1 ft./12 in. Q (in.): 6.39 Total (Ac.): 8.09 V = (ac-ft): 4.31 4. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the zero discharge elevation is: Interpolate Stage between... Interpolate Runoff between... 15.50 2.88 16.00 4.96 Stage: 15.84 STAGE_1.XLS The stage is at or below the Minimum Road Crown Elevation. (See flood routing calculations for correct 10 yr. stage elevations) PAGE 4 Groves Plaza Location CP&A PROJECT NO. 950404 SFWMD SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS STAGE_l.XLS PAGE 5 7) SUMMARY Required Storage: Soil Storage: ZERO DISCHARGE 10 Yr.-1 Day Storm: 25 Yr.-3 Day Storm: 100 Yr.-3 Day Storm: FLOOD ROUTING 10 Yr.-1 Day Storm: 25 Yr.-3 Day Storm: \TE PRINTED: ######## STAGE_1.XLS Groves Plaza Location CP&A PROJECT NO. 950404 SFWMD SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS 0.00 ac-ft 2.73 in 4.31 ac-ft 8.16 ac-ft 10.85 ac-ft 0.00 NGVD 0.00 NGVD PREPARED BY: dma PAGE 6 15.84 NGVD Stage Elevation 16.54 NGVD Stage Elevation 16.91 NGVD Stage Elevation 0.00 cfs Disch. 0.00 cfs Disch. . REVISED BY: DATE: 8/11/97 WEIR LENGTH WEIR ELEVATION WEIR COEFFICIENT TYPE OF BLEEDER SLOT SLOT INVERT ELEV. NOTCH HEIGHT NOTCH WIDTH 3 PT 17 FT. NGVD 3.13 HORIZONTAL RECTANGLE 12.5 PT. NGVD .5 P'l'. .1666667 PT. WEIR PLOW IN CPS --------------------.-------------- STAGE WEIR BLEEDER TOTAL -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 12.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 13.50 0.00 0.35 0.35 14.00 0.00 0.45 0.45 14.50 0.00 0.53 0.53 15.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 15.50 0.00 0.67 0.67 16.00 0.00 0.72 0.72 16.50 0.00 0.78 0.78 17.00 0.00 0.83 0.83 17.50 3.32 0.87 4.19 18.00 9.39 0.92 10.31 S C S PRO G RAM PROJECT NAME . . . . : GROVES PLAZA REVIEWER . . . . . . : J. THIELE PROJECT AREA . . . . : 8.09 ACRES GROUND STORAGE . . . : 2.73 INCHES TERMINATION DISCHARGE : 1.50 CFS DISTRIBUTION TYPE . . : SFHMD RETURN FREQUENCY . .: 10.00 YEARS RAINFALL DURATION . . : I-DAY 24-HOUR RAINFALL . . : 9.00 INCHES REPORTING SEQUENCE . : STANDARDIZED STAGE STORAGE DISCHARGE (FT) (AF) (CFS) 12.50 .00 .00 13.00 .00 .20 13.50 .00 .35 14.00 1.08 .45 14.50 1.21 .53 15.00 1.66 .60 15.50 2.88 .67 16.00 4.96 .72 16.50 7.89 .78 17.00 11.51 .83 17.50 15.21 4.19 - - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - - RAIN ACCUM. BASIN ACCUM. ACCUM. INSTANT AVERAGE TIME FALL RUNOFF DISCHGE IMFLOK VOLUME OUTFLOW DISCHGE DISCHGE STAGE (HR) (IM) (IN) (CFS) (AF) (AF) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (FT) .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 12.50 4.00 .41 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 12.50 8.00 1.23 .14 .8 .1 .0 .1 .4 .2 13.51 10.00 1.92 .46 1.8 .3 .2 .1 .4 .4 13.58 11.00 2.42 .76 3.0 .5 .4 .1 .4 .4 13.65 11.50 2.87 1.07 5.1 .7 .6 .1 .4 .4 13.73 11. 75 4.22 2.11 33.9 1.4 1.2 .2 .4 .4 13.91 12.00 5.90 3.55 47.0 2.4 2.2 .2 .6 .5 15.02 12.50 6.56 4.14 9.6 2.8 2.6 .2 .6 .6 15.33 13.00 6.90 4.45 5.1 3.0 2.8 .2 .7 .7 15.43 14.00 7.36 4.87 3.1 3.3 3.0 .3 .7 .7 15.52 16.00 7.92 5.38 2.0 3.6 3.2 .4 .7 .7 15.58 20.00 8.57 5.99 1.2 4.0 3.4 .6 .7 .7 15.62 24.00 9.00 6.39 .8 4.3 3.5 .8 .7 .7 15.64 SUMMARY INFORMATION MAXIMUM STAGE WAS 15.64 FEET AT 24.00 HOURS MAXIMUM DISCHARGE WAS .7 CFS AT 24.00 HOURS SCS PROGRAM PROJECT NAME . . . . : GROVES PLAZA REVIEWER . . . . . . : J. THIELE PROJECT AREA . 8.09 ACRES GROUND STORAGE . . . : 2.13 INCHES TERMINATION DISCHARGE: 1.50 CPS DISTRIBUTION TYPE . . : SFHMD RETURN FREQUENCY . .: 25.00 YEARS RAINFALL DURATION . . : 3-DAY 24-HOUR RAINPALL . .: 11.00 INCHES REPORTING SEQUKKCE . : STANDARDIZED STAGE STORAGE DISCHARGE (FT) (AP) (CFS) 12.50 .00 .00 13.00 .00 .20 13.50 .00 .35 14.00 1.08 .45 14.50 1.21 .53 15.00 1.66 .60 15.50 2.88 .61 16.00 4.96 .72 16.50 1.89 .18 11.00 11. 51 .83 11.50 15.21 4.19 - - - - - - RES ! R V 0 I R - - - - - RAIN ACCUM. BASIN ACCUM. ACCUH. INSTANT AVERAGE TIME PALL RUNOFF DISCHGE INFLOW VOLUME OUTFLOW DISCHGE DISCHGE STAGE (HR) (IN) (IN) (eps) (AF) (AP) (AF) (CPS) (CFS) (~T) .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 12.50 4.00 .27 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 12.50 8.00 .54 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 12.50 12.00 .80 .02 .1 .0 .0 .0 .1 .0 12.72 16.00 1.01 .08 .2 .1 .0 .1 .2 .1 12.90 20.00 1.34 .18 .2 .1 .0 .1 .2 .2 13.05 24.00 1.61 .30 .3 .2 .0 .2 .3 .2 13.20 28.00 2.00 .50 .5 .3 .0 .3 .4 .3 13.51 32.00 2.39 .14 .5 .5 .1 .4 .4 .4 13.53 36.00 2.78 1.00 .6 .7 .1 .6 .4 .4 13.56 40.00 3.17 1.28 .6 .9 .2 .7 .4 .4 13.59 44.00 3.56 1.58 .6 1.1 .3 .8 .4 .4 13.62 48.00 3.95 1.89 .6 1.3 .4 .9 .4 .4 13.66 52.00 4.44 2.29 1.0 1.5 .5 1.0 .4 .4 13.73 56.00 5.46 3.16 2.3 2.1 .9 1.2 .4 .4 13.93 58.00 6.29 3.90 3.5 2.6 1.4 1.2 .5 .5 14.63 59.00 6.91 4.45 5.2 3.0 1.7 1.3 .6 .6 14.98 ._--~~--------- ~----~ -----~----- -- .---. --------- - - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - - RAIN ACCUM. BASIN ACCUH. ACCUM. INSTANT AVERAGE TIHE FALL RUNOFP DISCHGE INFLOW VOLUME OUTFLOW DISCHGE DISCHGE STAGE (HR) (In) (IN) (CFS) (All') (All') (All') (CFS) (Cll'S) (FT) 59.50 7.46 4.95 8.2 3.3 2.0 1.3 .6 .6 15.11 59.75 9.11 6.49 50.2 4.4 3.0 1.4 .6 .6 15.35 60.00 11.16 8.45 63.8 5.7 4.3 1.4 .7 .7 15.69 60.50 11. 97 9.22 12.6 6.2 4.8 1.4 .7 .7 15.94 61.00 12.39 9.62 6.6 6.5 5.1 1.4 .7 .7 16.01 62.00 12.95 10.16 4.0 6.9 5.4 1.5 .7 .7' 16.06 64.00 13.63 10.82 2.6 7.3 5.7 1.6 .7 .7 16.12 68.00 14.42 11.59 1.6 7.8 6.0 1.8 .7 .7 16.17 72.00 14.95 12.11 1.0 8.2 6.1 2.1 .7 .7 16.19 SUKHARY INFORMATION MAXIMUM STAGE HAS 16.19 FEET AT 72.00 HOURS MAXIMUM DISCHARGE HAS .7 ers AT 72.00 HOURS ----- -----~ -- ---- - -- --~, _._---~.._._----- :- I'----~ j . ~~ ill . {'. ~ ". ,. ,. ,~ '\. '; \ \ \ ~ ~ ~ --. I' -' \\\\, " 0 '\ \ --' ~- .. -\" \ \ \\\1 - ~ ~ i ~ .... i ,..' ,,'1 ~ii -,.. , L-- ."wRENCf' . ' ' _ _ ' - -1'10...0 . -- . . .' - - .Illl'IlIW' "'. ~. --\\ ('~~,'\~ \ \J \ffin ~ ~ \\ \ \-" ~\\ \', ,. \'; =' '\\ 'l" ",,3'~ \f~~ y Ii \- :;::::.: _ _::::::--1: - " ,,_--n ___._ _,-'0 "" \.-.-'-- ....---. " '"'~. ,'-- \ \' ... \\ \ ( ',-::, \ \ \ . \\' .-------==>.;...\ i \ \\ \ '\~\: \\~ ~, ~ \', \\\~ \ .\~ \ \ ,," Q" ~~ t \\ \ ~---\., '-::-\_------------ :..J - \ \ ... t \ -- ,\uQ' ~ \ \ \f'" \" \.n \~' -\ ' IV \ ' .' ~. I : '\..J ~:S-----\J ~ .\ \ \ .l\ r- .~\ \ \~ ; (~ . \ \ ..::__~.:::-' t..;;;.r.,;;lt:' I \ \ \ , ,--_._.---'~- \ .--:~. I - '\ \' ,__ ,.J I ~ \( /~6,l~ '\ \ ~\\t ~\ 't.~. ~~\\ ~ \ ,), \ V \ \ ~ '1, 1\ ."~ ~ \ ',:\ , J--~- ,:-j ...' '\ \'_ ~\\-tr'\ "\ \\.& ~~~\ \ S~:?~~-- '.\ \ \ ~ ~ . :--~ '1... ',--.-' '-' '-' '--. ' :'" ~ .,. ~,... ;!!~ t;l i~~ Iii. ~ qs~J ..~\ ~O. ~l~ l ~i~; i;.. ..!\ ~il \ I j,"o" '!it ~~i ial!! 'i at!i .... i" .~.. \ \~\\ ~\ \\\ \\\ \ ~ \~\\ \\ ii! '\; \ \ -\~i ,~ 'A \\\ a 1 ,\\ \\ 11; t \ ~ ~o, 'ii It i' i ~.1 tl ' s\ \ '\ I' \' \ \ ~ii;;~ ii\\\ ~~~ll i\\\' \':111l lIS ,. .. i I 'S , ' , . ;, , ! 1" 5 ; , \11 J 8 R JubDl'l fkljeCI to ~ote' ~ \ ~ ~?;t ~;l~\ .".... ...' 01' .... ,._.... r...M''''' ,......... .......... ~....f ..o.to,\\ 1''1 t.,.e"E.\\ s\1e ~\..,," u.,O\JE PLf>..Zf>.. -_._----~ . - -- -^---- --~~- Lewis, Nicole From: Rumpf, Michael Sent: Friday, September 01,20008:27 AM To: Lewis, Nicole Subject: RE: question (1.. - ~I.-'\'m li* q ::0 fro VI~iv '>, (feJLi( (~:f ~~rd.cttt That would be the most recent master plan, and go ahead and e-mail her.MR. -' -----Original Message---- From: Lewis, Nicole Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 7:12 AM To: Rumpf, Michael Subject: RE: question Mike: Which Grove Plaza plans,{ rectified-or Eckerd?) and files ( most recent?). Also, do you have phone or fax number for her, so I can call her for more information? Please let me know. When I have more specifics on exactly what info she wants, perhaps we can accommodate her request for Tuesday. Thanks, Nicole -----Original Message----- From: Rumpf, Michael Sent: Thursday, August 31,20005:47 PM To: Lewis, Nicole Cc: 'jwaresh@pbpost.com' Subject: RE: question Nicole, could you locate these plans/files and inform Ms. Waresh if available by Tuesday? Thank you. MR. -----Original Message----- From: Julie Waresh rSMTP:iwaresh@pbpost.coml Sent: Thursday, August 31,20004:32 PM To: Rumpf, Michael Subject: Re: question Michael, I would like to come take a look at the Grove Plaza plans on Tuesday morning. Who do I need to notify? Lewis, Nicole From: Rumpf, Michael Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 5:47PM To: Lewis, Nicole Cc: 'jwaresh@pbpost.com' Subject: RE: question Nicole, could you locate these plans/files and inform Ms. Waresh if available by Tuesday? Thank you. MR. -----Original Message---- From: Julie Waresh rSMTP:iwaresh@oboost.coml Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 4:32 PM To: Rumpf, Michael Subject: Re: question Michael, I would like to come take a look at the Grove Plaza plans on Tuesday morning. Who do I need to notify? Department of Engineering and Public WOrks PO, Box 21229 West Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229 (561) 684-4000 . Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Ken L. Foster, Chairman Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A, Roberts warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Maude Ford Lee County Administrator Robert Weisman. PE, "An Equal Opportunity Affinrw.tive Action Employer" @ printed on recycled paper ill ~~ ~ 'UJ::!'" . ....., I ~~-~~ October 30, 1996 Mr. Dan DeCarlo Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE: GROVE PLAZA Dear Mr. DeCarlo: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has received a peak hour turning movement analysis from Carnahan - Proctor and Associates for the Grove Plaza project. The transmittal letter states that the City of Boynton Beach has requested County review of the analysis. No site plan has been provided to facilitate the review. A site plan is needed so that the turning movements can be analyzed in light of the arrangement of the land uses, the internal circulation patterns, and the parting configuration. I have reviewed the information provided and have two concerns. 1. The analysis shows an even distribution of right turns in (50,50,48) at the three entrances on Hypoluxo Road. Generally, right turns in at a project tend to be highest at the first entrance or at the entrance closest to the most intense uses. A redistribution of the turning movements will probably result in the number of right turns in at one of the entrances exceeding the County guideline for a right turn lane, 70 peak hour right turns. 2. The frontage on Hypoluxo Road appears to be approximately 1,200 feet (scaled from the Redi Maps). This frontage is sufficient to accommodate the three driveways, based on the minimum spacing requirements of the County's Access Management Standards. The minimum spacings are 125 feet for corner clearance and 245 feet for driveway spacing. However, it is the stated goal of the Access Management Standards to keep the number of driveways to a minimum and evaluate the number of driveways on a case by case basis. October 30, 1996 Mr. Dan DeCarlo GROVE PLAZA page two This review does not constitute approval of any access to a County Roadway. The developer must submit a formal application, with plans, to the Land Development Division of the Palm Beach County Engineering Department. If you have any questions, please contact me at 684-4030. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER ~ :J1r~ Dan Weisberg, P.E. Senior Registered Civil Engineer cc. Kenneth Cox, P.E., Carnahan - Proctor Andy Hertel, Traffic Division File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review g :\user\dweisber\wp50\tps\boyn46c .-. 11'\, I ~ , ! \ " 4- 10.. '.' } PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-600 Al Newbold Deputy BUi~in~ pfficial Dan De~~~~~n~ Assistant Planner TO: FROM: THRU: Michael E. Haag Zoning and Site Development Administrator DATE: October 17, 1995 SUBJECT: Transmittal of Development Orders GROVE PLAZA Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents regarding development plans that received final approval. 1. Proj ect Name: Type of Application: Planning and ZOning Department File No.: Staff Report and Comments: Control Plans: Color Elevation Drawings: Board of Adjustment Approval: Planning and Development Board Approval: City Commission Approval: Resolution No.: Ordinance No.: MEH:arw Attachments Il:Translltl.Grv GROVE PLAZA Subdivision Master Plan SBMP 95-001 32 pages 5 sheets N/A N/A 9-12-95 meeting minutes 9-19-95 meeting minutes N/A N/A ,.--' ~ ()..p,J %e City of $oynton 'BelUh /.~ /'rt!' o' · ! " i I' " ~ V 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beam'1Joukvarti P.o. 'B01(310 'Boynton 'Beadt, '.Fforida. 33425-0310 City:Jfafi: (407) 375-6()()() '.F.9lX: (407) 375-6090 September 12, 1995 Charles W. DeSanti JulIan Bryan 756 St. Dubons DrIve Boca Raton, Florida 33409 Re: Grove Plaza Third Review - File No. SBMP 95-001 Dear Mr. DeSanti and Mr. Bryan: , The cost of the third Technical Review CommIttee review for the above-captioned submitted is as follows: UtIlities BUIldIng EngineerIng Planning and Zoning 19.16 38.68 63.91 62.25 Total $184.00 Please remlt the amount or S184.00 to the City of Boynton for tne cost of this reVlew, prior to September 19, 1995 Very truly yours, ~ ' dkJ0.< . J-:4de~- Tarnb~i J. Heyden PlannIng and Zoning Director TJH:bme xc: Central FIle ~:3rd=evC~6t.MAC/t~c jfmeriaz's (jateway to tlU (julfstream Board of County Commissioners Ken L. Foster, Chairman Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Maude Ford Lee 8 County Administrator Robert Weisman ( J>epartment of Engineering v~ .~. ~ and Public Works September 12, 1995 Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach. FL 33425-0110 RE: GROVE PLAZA Dear Ms. Heyden: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the revised traffic impact study for the project entitled Grove Plaza, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The proposed project will consist of 18,000 square feet of general retail, 3,600 square feet of bank with dri ve-through and 7,200 square feet of fast food restaurant with drive through. The build-out has been revised from mid year 1996 to the end of 1996. The proposed project will generate 4,788 daily trips, given a 5% internalization rate. The traffic study corrects the deficiency of the earlier traffic study. It addressed the traffic on Gateway Boulevard. The project is required to phase to the widening of Gateway Boulevard from Military Trail to Congress Avenue. The project can build development generating up to 1,083 external daily trips before the contract is let for this roadway improvement. This roadway improvement is scheduled for FY 96/97. The project is also requi red to phase to the wideni ng of Lantana Road from Military Trail to Conqress Avenue. The project can build development generating up to 3,492 external daily trips before the contract is let for this roadway improvement. This roadway improvement is a requirement of the Winston Trails PUD. They are require to pay for the improvement by the end of 1995. I do not have the proposed contract letting date at this time. The Traffic Division has determined that, based on the phasing of the project to the widening of Gateway Boulevard from Military Trail to Congress Avenue and the widening of Lantana Road from Military Trail to Congress Avenue, the project meets the requirements of the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684- 4030. "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" @ printed on recycled paper Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000 September 12, 1995 Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director GROVE PLAZA page two Palm Beach County has programmed the widening of Lawrence Road for FY 97/987. This will be a 5-lane roadway within a right-of-way of 80 feet. Hypoluxo Road is shown to have an ultimate right-of-way of 110 feet. This will accommodate a 6-lane roadway, although the widening is not scheduled at this time. Palm Beach County request that the City of Boynton Beach require the development to dedicate or reserve the right-of-way necessary for the ultimate cross section for Lawrence Road and Hypol uxo Road, and an expanded intersection at Lawrence Road and Hypoluxo RO'ld. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER ~~4 Dan Weisberg, P.E. Senior Registered Civil Engineer cc. William Hukill, P.E., Director Boynton Beach Department of Development File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review g:\user\dweisber\wp50\tps\boyn46b %e City of 'Boynton 13eac/i ~4. '"", -----.:::==:: ,~ 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Buuli 'Boukvartf P.O. 'Bo'{.31O 'Boynton 'Buuli, 1torida. 33425-0310 City:Jfafl: (407) 375-6000 :FJU: (407) 375-6090 August 22, 1996 Julian T. Bryan III Julian Bryan & Associates 756 S1. Albans Drive Boca Raton, FL 33486 RE: CURRENT ACTIVE STATUS OF THE GROVE PLAZA SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN Dear Mr. Bryan: Pursuant to your request for confirmation of the status of the above-referenced project, please be informed that this approval is currently active, and will remain active through March 19, 1997. This determination is in accordance with the City's Land Development Regulations which limits the time period within which a site plan must be approved, or plat recorded, to 18 months from the date of master plan approval. This expiration date of March 19, 1997 is based on the original approval date for the Grove Plaza Subdivision Master Plan of September 19, 1995. From your letter dated August 12, 1996, it would appear that this information may contradict your current understanding of this project's status. Although I do recall responding to your previous request for this information through a message left on your telephone answering system, I do not remember my exact response. However, I apologize for any misunderstanding that may h(!ve resulted from my telephone message, and assure you that the information contained herein is accurate, including that your project is currently active. Sincerely, 7L'- ,~. Jf~ Michael Rumpf Senior Planner cc: Tambri Heyden C:MR\WP51 \DA T A\JULIAN )ttmerUas (jateway to tfie (juifstream ; t Julian Bryan & Associates August 15, 1995 Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director Planning & Zoning Department, City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 RE: GROVE PLAZA (s.e. corner Hypoluxo & Lawrence) Dear Ms. Heyden, Attached are twelve copies of the revised referenced parcel. Also included are twelve engineering, existing vegetation analysis and required barriers. Master Plan for the above copies of revised schematic landscape appeal for interior The master plan represents the initial step in the approval process for this development. Detailed site plans will be submitted for each phase as the specific use is determined and building permits are sought. All signage and exterior colors will be of uniform design to be established with the initial phase. It is my understanding that this master plan will be considered at your Planning and Development Board meeting of September 12, 1995. Should you have any questions or desire further information, please feel free to call. Sincerely, A~ Julian /. Bryan III I Land Development Consultants · 756 St. Albans Drive · Boca Raton, Florida 33486 · (407) 338-0395 ~~"i,"""~'~_""""'c DeSanti & Associates, Inc. l August 1, 1995 Mr. Mike Haag Planning and Zoning Site Administrator Department of Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Second Floor Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310 RE: Request for appeal from the Landscape code - Article II, Section 5.E."Perimeter Landscaping relating to abutting properties", per Master Plan for Grove Plaza submitted concurrently for approval. Dear Mr. Haag, Please accept this request for approval of the attached Master Landscape Plan, which locates the required perimeter landscape barrier adjacent to the access corridor at the entrances to the development, in ten (10) foot landscape strips, which is four (4) times the size of the minimum required landscape strips. The code literally requires that the "landscape barrier be placed between the common lot line and the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area in a planting strip of not less than two and one-half (2 1/2) feet in width" . The development is of unified design and will be controlled by an association of all property owners, required by the platting process. Therefore, proper maintenance is assured. The development will provide for meeting the intent of the landscape code by providing landscape barriers from parking and access ways and will provide at a minimum of between 50% and 100% more landscaping than required by the code as a minimum. By approving our request, the Board will be setting higher standard than is otherwise provided by the Code minimums. We therefore respectfully request approval of our request to a4just the location of the required landscape barrier. Thank you for your consideration throughout the review process. Charles W. De Santi --J,' With watm regar xc: Robert Fay Julian Bryan 3558 Magellan Circle #131, North Miami Beach, Fla. 33180 - (Office) 305-935-6269 (Fax) 305- 932- 3033 - (Mobile) 407- 346- 2857 DeSanti & Associates, Inc. August 1, 1995 Mr. Mike Haag Planning and Zoning Site Administrator Department of Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Second Floor Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310 RE: Resubmittal of Modified Master Plan for TRC committee members signoffper the recent TRC meeting held on July 25, 1995. Dear Mr. Haag, Please accept Mr. Bryan's modified Master Plan for sign off pursuant to the comments of the TRC membership. I refer you to my letter dated July 20, 1995, for details of the property history, for the Planning and Development Board's review and consideration. I understand that the August 22, 1995 special meeting of the Planning and Development Board will not be held and therefore, I respectfully request that we be placed on the next agenda of the Planning and Development Board, which will be held in early September 1995. Thank you for your consideration throughout the review process. With warm re Charles W. Dc Santi xc: Robert Fay Julian Bryan 3558 Magellan Circle #131, North Miami Beach, Fla. 33180 - (Office) 305-935-6269 (Fax) 305- 932- 3033 - (Mobile) 407- 346- 2857 Ip. ~, m @ ~ 0 w ~ ~ ; tI < I ~ II L~ ~ I 9 19$ PLANNING AND L ZONING DEPT. Julian Bryan & Associates August 12, 1996 Mr. Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner Planning & Zoning Department, City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 RE: GROVE PLAZA (s.e. corner Hypoluxo & Lawrence) Dear Mr. Rumpf, Thank you for your recent response to my inquiry regarding the Master Plan approval of the above referenced project. From your message, I understand that the non-residential Master Plan approval granted in September 1995, does not have an expiration date. Through our consulting engineers, Carnahan-Proctor and Associates, we continue to work with your Engineering and Utility departments on the location of our sewer connection. Were it not for this one item the final plat of the total 8.2 acres would have by now received final City approval. Presently, the owners are negotiating with a number of potential users of the site. We may in the very near future bring in only one, several, or all six of the pods for detailed site plan review and approval. As you may recall, the approved Master Plan governs parking layout, vehicular circulation and building locations within the overall tract. I would appreciate your verification by return correspondence of the fact that the Master Plan remains valid as approved by the City and has no expiration date. As always, your assistance is very much appreciated. Iy, .~~ Julian T. BTII Carnahan - Proctor and Associates land Development Consultants · 756 St. Albans Drive · Boca Raton. Florida 33486 · (407) 338-0395 DeSanti & Associates, Inc. August 1,1995 Mr. Mike Haag Planning and Zoning Site Administrator Department of Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd Second Floor Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310 RE: Request for appeal from the Landscape code - Article II, Section 5.E."Perimeter Landscaping relating to abutting properties", per Master Plan for Grove Plaza submitted concurrently for approval. Dear Mr. Haag. Please accept this request for approval of the attached Master Landscape Plan, which locates the required perimeter landscape barrier adjacent to the access corridor at the entrances to the development, in ten (10) foot landscape strips, which is four (4) times the size of the minimum required landscape strips. The code literally requires that the ")ano'=lpe barrier be placed between the common lot line and the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area in a planting strip of not less than two and one-half (2 1/2) feet in width" . The development is of unified design and will be controlled by an association of all property Oll-ners, required by the platting process. Therefore, proper maintenance is assured The development will provide for meeting the intent of the Janrl~~ code by providing landscape barriers from parking and access ways and will provide at a minimum of between 50% and 100% more landsc.<Jping than required by the code as a minimum. By approving our request , the Board ",ill be setting higher standard than is otherwise provided by the Code minimums. We therefore respectfully request approval of our request to adjust the location of the required landscape barrier. Thank you for your consideration throughout the review process. Withwannre~ --- j~ Charles W. De Santi " xc: Robert Fay Julian Bryan 9558 Magellan Circle #191, North Miami Beach, Fla. 99180 - (Office) 905-935-6269 (Fax) 905- 992- 9033 - (Mobile) 407- 346- 2857