REVIEW COMMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 99-189
TO: Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal
Larry Quinn, Public Works
Mike Haag, Building Division
Ken Hall, Engineering Division
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department
Lee Thompson, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Division
t1G./?-
FROM: Michael W. Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning
DATE: July 27,1999
SUBJECT: Rectified Plans for - McCraney
Project Type - New Site Plan 99-006
The amended new site plan for McCraney has been submitted for final sign-off by the Technical
Review Committee. Three (3) sets of plans, each requiring your unconditional signature, are
available for review in Planning and Zoning. A copy of the originally reviewed plans, staff
comments and development order are available for your use to perform the review.
Please review and sign-off each of the three (3) sets of plans, NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M.,
August 3, 1999. If the plans are not in compliance with your staff comments or City regulations,
do not sign the plans but only indicate the memorandum number where your comments are
documented. To facilitate the sign-off process, please resubmit written or electronic comments
addressed to the Planning and Zoning Director, NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., Date.
Thank you for your prompt response to this request.
MWR:jma
cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief
Marshall Gage, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
IICH\MAINISHRDA TAIPLANNINGISHAREDlWPlPROJECTSIRECTIFIED lETTER FORM. DOC
1J~PARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 99-138
SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
May 25,1999
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Project Name: McCraney SW 30th, Inc.
Property Owner: Enrico Rossi
Applicant/ Agent: Richard Sun, Architect
Location:
File No.:
Land Use:
Zoning:
Type of Use:
No. of Bays:
Square Footage:
Lawson Industrial Park Lot #14 (See Exhibit "A"-Location Map) southwest comer
of SW 14th Place and SW 30th Avenue
NWSP 99-006
Industrial
Ml
Office/W arehouse
15
Site Area: 60,984 square feet (1.14 acre);
Total Building Area- 19.980 square feet or 32.8% lot coverage
Adjacent land uses and zoning:
North - SW 30th Avenue right-of-way, and farther north, industrial use zoned Ml
South - Industrial Use, zoned Ml
East - SW 14m Place right-of-way, and farther south, industrial use zoned Ml
West-Industrial Use zoned M 1
Site Characteristics:
Proposal:
Concurrency:
a. Traffic-
b. Drainage-
The subject property is undeveloped with no existing trees on site. A 12-foot utility
easement dedicated to Florida Power and Light lies at the westernmost portion of
the lot, along the west lot line.
The owner is proposing a single-story building of 19,980 square feet to be built in
one phase. The project will be designed for individual warehouse and office uses.
Individual entrances and overhead doors are allocated to each of the 15 units
proposed for the building (See Exhibit "B" - Proposed Site Plan).
As a condition of approval, the Planning and Zoning Division requires written
confirmation from the county that the project will meet level of service standards
and conform to the county's traffic performance standards ordinance. This
requirement is included as a condition of approval until the traffic review has been
completed and conformance is confirmed. Confirmation from the Palm Beach
County has not been received to date.
Conceptual drainage information was provided for the city's review, including
confirmation from a certified engineer that the project's drainage will conform to
portions of city code. The city's concurrency ordinance requires drainage
certification at time of site plan approval. The Engineering Division is
recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred to time of
McCraney Office/Warehouse
NWSP 99-006
Page 2
permit review when the required technical information will be submitted.
Driveways: Proposed access consists of two, two-way driveways, each 32 feet wide and placed
at the two adjacent streets (SW 30th Avenue and SW 14th Place).
Parking: According to the parking ratio of one space per 800 square feet of warehouse area,
and one space per 300 square feet of office space, the project would require a total
of 36 spaces (including handicapped spaces). A total of 42 spaces will be
provided. The plan does currently meet the parking requirements as stated in the
Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning and ADA requirements for
this use.
Landscaping: The landscaping of the site will fully meet code requirements when staff comments
are incorporated. The development will be provided with the required amount of
perimeter and internal landscaping as required in the Land Development
Regulations, Chapter 7.5 Article II. Also, the site will be further enhanced with a
5 foot wide landscape buffer; an upgrade from the minimum 2.5 foot buffer
required along adjoining properties. Lastly, the project developer will be required
to install landscaping and irrigation for the adjacent median, which will be
maintained by the city.
Building and Site: Building and site regulations will fully meet code when staff comments are
incorporated into the permit drawings.
Community Design: The proposed building will be constructed of concrete block units (emu) with
stucco finish. It will offer consistency with adjacent or nearby structures which are
predominantly of same design, scale and principle color. The unifying design and
elements of the surrounding area also consist of recessed storefronts and overhang
doors for each tenant, raised stucco reveal, and light texture stucco finish.
Signage: Proposed site signage includes a monument sign to identify the building and up to
8 tenants, and dimensioned at 9 feet high and 8 feet wide (a total of 32 square feet
of sign face per side, or Ih the maximum allowed by code based on lot frontage).
The site sign is to be internally lit, finished with stucco to match the building
color, and oriented to face east and west along SW 30th Avenue. Also proposed,
are individual tenant wall signs placed above respective entries, and an 80 square
foot wall sign centered on the north fa~ade that identifies the project or building
name. Individual tenant signs will be uniform in size and letter font.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Division recommends that this request for site plan approval be approved,
subject to the comments included in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. The Technical Review
Committee recommends that the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans
submitted for building permits.
MWR
xc: Central File
Attachments
J :ISHRDA T A IPlanninglSHAREDI WPIPROJECTSIReport McCraney.doc
f:,"'r"~
. t;', A\ \~"'~
F\ "'3~ \' ,.--" .
~, t'l-r ~ .~,,<;I
,,\31'<-\:
'.-*'\
~-"---\
'. \' \
" \
\ \
"rJfl\ \
,.~'
, '
, .
, .
, .
\tJ "
\vii'
~ \~
,.,....\ \\\\\.\ \~,
t~\ 0/ \\t'\ \~~
.y:~ ':"\0. \1'~\~ \~, ~
\"t, I', ... ~'\"~ .~\ ,.
~~\ \~. .. 'h~.';. '@;., \.
a ~.t "~\.. 10~ \ "y;;\
<!:,...... ,\, '-'. . ,~\
,_ ,..... "l~t. '''0 ,,\tJ-4.'
'f. A \,~ ~ - "~'.
'" < \ '~ff1'
\~. ~~\ \
'\ \~\\ i
\ '~\
.. ,~\
~\ ');,~\
. '
. '
~ \..~
~~~
\.,\\\
\
\~~
\\\i
,
\
\
\
~
'\~
";,
,
\?~~t
\~\\\.
\ ---\
\
\
\
\
\
~\~1
\\\ '~~
\~
\\ \
,\ \
\ \
\
...-\\
~,\~ \
,..,
:l.:"~
\\ ~
\" ~
\ ..
~ ~
\ \
\ I I
I "I I
\ \Ilil':\,.
1ft Il..\'
~ \};.fr
~\\
\\ \
~\ \
\\ ~
\~
~
~
\;.
'"
\
\ ~
\\\\\ ~\
\ ~ \~~,\,~l
10"9-
l\~1>\i~\~" "V ~~~
. ~~t< \t':~
. '\,.~ ~ "':'..ri)~ -.V!
'\,.O't ,\.., -.o't\".
~
\
/~
~~
-_/'
~-,----
n
I
I
I
.
I
i
I
I a
g
~
i t ~ ~
~ ~~ ~
",. ii
~ ; E ~
~ 2~ ~
3 ~: r;
~ to C
~
..
l~ ~ I
;~ ..
~
!l~ ~
2~
z~
~ .
" .
< . 0:
~~
:;:"1
< M
!:~
2
I~
~~
....
nn~~
jU ~ CZh
l!U C/J
Ii o~ .
H! iil
~I "1J
I i 5:
I ~ z
. !
. ;;
< ,
s ~
~ l
~ i
i ~
I ,
~ ~
8
~
~
o
c
ra
C/J
-I
!D
~
o
r
g !i
~ ~
~ ii 1!lIi: m;
r i i,,'h~ s"
)> .'w di:
z Im'i ;~(
dm. ~
.j
f!!
~ i!
5 "I;
Z i
I rn l
:g ~
- ~ E)cIIBIT B \
.------------------------------r-----------------------------------l
D I> ~g ~ 60' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE ! ;:
C;o~ &c WATER RETENTION PURPOSES~ IlI':iJVl. ~
.. )II g~ \ n~~ J n
en .. \ ;l> :JI I ~
i "J' "J r'J I ;g~ \ ~
~ '-f~rl=~-- J~<: NORTH .., 256,03'. S l;: q
~ ~Ij --
~-1 ,r!J --;:;;rJ
i ~;.e ~ Q?
~ ~~ ~
~;, ~e i
~~ 8 ~ ~
012 ... V)
i!!'-l ~ -t
:.1 ~
j! ~
~ ~
~o ~
~ -I S
~ z
g~
Ii! \
\ei \' ~
';;. ~ :;::
a ,J
-.: -.:~;; ;; ~,:.\\;
~ .s z,; E _
! \
~
r ~
~ ""
~ :,. i
i~
~.
~ ~\
i
. i
NORTH
.If)
:i ~
. I Vi
10
, -1
::L
i
,)>
<
;1f""l
'I'
-\
U
I
,
o
-I
.
ll..OIlI
(UIl3)
i~
(J)
- - -
~~ ---
J
r:~i1 oJ~
3:.'1:1 r.~2
--------....... ..~..~
,
,
,
"
r
n
9
......,
....~
~sa
~~~
II
Ii
h
r'.'.
!.-il-
(~!I
11~:d
2:~1'
I'''':;
i~H
"
..
.- " .- ,r
iI i ;:
ue
a ,
iI iI ~
u~
'). J~ i
i II" I
II
~i:
..0
~ Z j
i ~ I
II ~ ~
~ C/J i
"1- l
~ ~.
hol
II !!I
II )-
.r-
t
II!I !HI !!IIWI!I!! el
~ II - U ~ ~ ~~ I 'I . l .
~ ~ ~ 9 II ~ ~~, " ~ i i ti
~h~ ICIC ~ ; ~i~e~n! ~
.. ~ 11 ~ . .. iii '" ~ Ii. 5
~hh~" j :..~!l:!l:~ ~
g _ . ~ i I ~ ",.;" ~ ~ 'II ;
o ell: ~ . Ii ~ ~H ~ ~;
~g;J"~ ~ ~
:~ U i ~
~.... ~
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR
LOT 14, LAWSON INDUSTRIAL PARK.
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
II i II !,!l;
II
I
;, .
!
l'Inn I ~. !11E1
~ l.r rl ~
t ~ l ii{
; P i f~~! ~
I
0 :i
I
i U I~ ~ [3& q~ pnJ~ JUi ~
i ~~ 'Il j P8. i'& iI~~ ...~ ~
i Ii i i i1111lr III III t:
l:Il
>-I
i ,.111 ~ U I I i I I I
;111 pi . ~
~ ;J" l!J ~
'; i I iI ii I III Iii
~ ~ & ~I !I 1 ~I
~ ~ ~ ~ I
III J I! i
~ i ;p ... 0101. u.
iiI , ~ ~~ H
'I n ~~
~ I I .
~ 'I . . n
,. ~ ~ Ijl(
. .
! 5 H
;J ;J H
l l iI ul
~~
u
OFFICE/W AREHOUSE I UU :!Ii III
McCRANEY PROPERTY COMPANY @
BOYNTON BEACH . . !,;?
.. .. n~~
FLORIDA ~~
LANDSCAPE PLAN UQUi
-- ------
------.----- -- - - ~ -------_.-_.---
EXHIBIT
c. \Oi'lG\.~PC\8aynton\IC84840-rl.d.g Frl Hay 14 08: 39: 16 1999
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
]
I
,
\
Ii
I,
I
I
I
I
\
,
I
,
\
- - r -
~ijli.,~r,.,
,r~~""- ",!-~ ·
.' - . , /1. ~.
..' "f" (........,.~
:1 ,,"" ........,.
~) '\ "....-,,, I
';.9/"1 .~/. ,~;
EXHIBIT "e"
CONDITIONS OF APPROV AL
Project name: MC CRANEY SW 30th, INC
File number: NWSP 99-006
Reference' 2nd Review New Site Plan File #99-006
.
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments:
1. As per section 10-25 in the City Code, free dumping access to containers
at all times shall be provided by the user.
2. Waste removal in connection with construction process must be serviced
by the City of Boynton Beach including City's roll-off dumpster. Place
note on dumpster detail to indicate same.
3. Dumpster enclosure gates must be able to open wide, with locking pegs
for open and closed positions.
4. Dumpster enclosure must be bigger if bollards are to be installed inside
the enclosure.
UTILITIES
Comments: General Comments
5. All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping
drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with
utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed
within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the
easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within
the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5 18.1 gives public
utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility
services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. There is a
direct conflict between a tree and the proposed fire hydrant located in the
northwest comer of the property, which must be resolved.
6. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or
the requirement imposed by msurance underwriters, whichever is
greater. (see Sec. 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your
HRS permit submittal.
7. Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health
Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval,
whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final
meter size, or expected demand.
8. Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform to
Page 2
File Name: McCraney SW 30th Inc.
File No.: NWSP 99-006
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
all rules of the City and the South Florida Water Management District.
(LDR Chap. 4, sec. 7F).
Specific Conditions
9. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be
included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements
on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The
easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated
in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code.
10. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer
utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to
the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a
permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of
occupancy.
11. Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water
service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in
accordance with Sec. 26-207.
12. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has
approved the construction plans for the water and sewer improvements
required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15)
13. The waste stream from the manufacturing process must meet the City's
pretreatment requirements. A sampling point must be provided to allow
monitoring of this waste stream. (Sec. 26-143, 26-147).
FIRE
Comments:
14. Show minimum turning radius of 45 feet.
15. Water mains and fire department connections are not shown.
16. No part of the structure may be more than 200 feet from a hydrant. A
fire flow test is required; LDR 6-16
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
17. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code
Page 3
File Name: McCraney SW 30th Inc.
File No.: NWSP 99-006
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not
limited to the following: site lighting, pavmg, drainage, curbing,
landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting
agencies, such as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, L WDD, DEP and any
others, shall be included with your permit request.
18. Provide an engineer's certification in writing that drainage will conform
with all rules, regulations, codes, etc. including, but not limited to,
Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 of these Land Development Regulations.
[LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2.]
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
19. Identify the finish floor elevation within the footprint of the building
that is illustrated on the floor plan drawing. Add to the site data, found
on sheet SP 1, the flood zone that the building is located within
including, where applicable, base flood elevation. If there is no base
flood elevation, indicate that on the plan. Add specifications to the site
data that will verify that the proposed finish floor elevation is in
compliance with the minimum standards of the following:
a) Minimum elevation required by the flood zone.
b) Minimum elevation required by the South Florida Water
Management District permit for the project (Lawson Industrial).
c) Show and specify that the elevation of the finish floor is not less than
six inches above the crown of the abutting right(s)-of-way.
20. At time of permit review, identify on the site plan the actual setback
dimension from the leading edge of the east face of the building to the
east property line. Please note that the setback dimension shall be
measured from the overhang, covered walkways, canopies or awnings.
The building setbacks shall comply with Zoning Code regulations.
21. Add the following note to sign area calculation found on sheet SP 1 -
"Drawings of the signage shall comply with the applicable regulations
specified in the Sign Code (Chapter 21 of the Land Development
Regulations)."
22. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed plans including a
current survey.
23. Compliance with the Building Codes will be evaluated at time of permit
review. The permit fee, water and sewer facility fees, County fees and
State fees will be determined at time of permit review.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Page 4
File Name: McCraney SW 30th Inc.
File No.: NWSP 99-006
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
24. The applicant will have to complete the land-clearing permit prior to
requesting the first building permit.
25. The applicant must submit landscape and irrigation plans for the grass
median on SW 30th Ave. abutting the site.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
26. Label and dimension all required landscape strips on the landscape plan.
27. Extend terminal islands at the northeast comer of the building to align
with end of accessible parking stalls.
28. Submit necessary traffic analysis, and confirmation from Palm Beach
County that project complies with the Traffic Performance Standards
Ordinance.
29. Add the street address (number) on the sign base, centered on both sides
just below the sign face.
30. Correct internal inconsistency between application which indicates
building size to be 19,550 square feet and 32.1% lot coverage and the
site plan which shows project size to be 19,980 square feet and 32.8%
lot coverage.
31. Add note to site plan to indicate the per unit/bav breakdown of use (e.g.
25% for office).
32. Add note to plan indicating that parking calculation is based on a
scenario to include only office and warehouse, or incorporate
manufacturing space into calculation and increase spaces accordingly.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD COMMENTS
33. To be determined
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION BOARD COMMENTS
34. To be determined
J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTSIMC CRANEY12nd REVIEW COMMENTS NWSP.doc
)EPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 99-081
FROM:
TRC MEMBERS
Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Sgt. Eric Jensen, Police Department
Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department
Michael Haag, Building Division
Ken Hall, Engineering Division
AI Kim, Public Works Department
John Wildner, Parks Division
Ray Davidson, Acting City Engineer
Bob Donovan, Permit Application Group
It? ~/
~ !:--
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
TO:
DATE:
March 24, 1999
RE:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1ST Review - New Site Plan
Project - Mc Craney SW 30th, Inc.
Location - SW 14th Place
Agent Richard Sum, Architect - The Sun Group
File No. NWSP 99-006
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the
plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments to me no later than 5:00 P.M. on April 7.
1999. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code
deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance
the project.
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the
applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations. Site Plan Review
and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the
exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is
insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the
documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by
the reviewer by contacting Scott Barber.
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the
documents.
'"
(6) Ct
11,) .0.
./
I r:J -Tife- C; I Ie t' <..A-l-.J -r-A ?-"Jl.-\i2- 1/A- T~ , 1'1'- ()..j \ ,) e- Tj-H...C- fD~ '1>) !).J & p'Tr',
I)) ,'~.~
:2. "C\ '-.. ""C:- p..",.{",
c..ILvl~~i:- .-;)....;,V v' ,I'r...V'O,,(,~.J
Cff! ce /f AJiJ 11-(-/6 ~d3.4"-:;
C rf, If :; t=c-. /7 ffi!! E. ~.
DUE
tJfh:E" t1~h).:' e- 5&\,},+."-E' fvo~,
~
Arv'~ r;~{~t\.f-..f~ CrrLCJCrj'T\Grj'S --n+,:,r /j-J,~I''1 CH-riJj6E.
7C --rt-+t-- ~vE JVlENlh.v'fU 3Qv,ih: t FOc.Ji't9-L"'Jf""5.
~/'t~\.~l_~~~~~A~~
N. f' ICr-YJ;Jf~ ~m~' 11.r ~i ~)~~~.
,_ r ~{/c.~,/ : . I Al~i- /
~ -~
<;~.?-j...,'i'('" A C.{)L()ji.-ZD6tt~J.Jt Ti{>'.J G(,4{'fflc... V,IL: l',A.,/c/ r/lce
jAirr;t/JJL1.D lultlL CUr...../.t.....,,;;?)tJ'S CPo cf .{'C? 7 mfJ;,Oz.
11 /'_ () /'
/1/ o..../? dC,' J"-; 'j} {It;r:-; ((..'-~//; '-.i1
i! I '" I
QI OJJ T'f:e: t:;1 Tf .:;'{ ,1.\), Rz,- J I I)E If ,-
-../
I ~\ Lr:,'li>/,-:;:;f
c ~ I _ :_._ r
, OIL-- ,-0 i \.0&<:.J' dr
0:;0 'H'" ,::;. ~..j;'-{.J{
cfr 5( I<A E />.Jl
'2.) 1): ,v ci'J \ '>\j 1H-e LcJ-':C 0 c f L.J ttG (t.... 60f 4> 3n c, n~ c,.J
C (If! V( ,< ,..,' "1
, f
~ ('
t~ .~ ~-'':. -, I .., r'}
/ ~.j " v _ U'"
f\lQI1' B fK.L cf vJ tt-6 E:-l- <s;rc?
TO f'i)f.::;E- t'f p~ vflVlf-iJl ')
-~,/
"?) D E>:'.'~ C \" \ ('\ : h.-) zf
I
C \),') i.'::, - U \L f Ll,uf uJ H 1.(/.+ I "!::;, .t;; CUT
- '6
? - !! , ,....."" :/
ri-C.'iV -r~ U'L-L--:l.A_~.
ri2 (: )/1,~~~(' Itl';'-/ /-)r1,U&);(,-Z (tty .t2(}/vlP'6 '?
L"C'4-Te' H0~ Lf'h~:: L
A-- L. L (21)..'1 D 00 12~
Co20S~ rJ((F(~~ 7?J 71+L!:: <"vJ~ =sont
0"-
4.)
5)
~ fEI)i'~T{:!(~JJ
t./
Me--. /.1/./0/10,2 S~,.). 14"';,4 PL/+-ct- 4' 51t7c"'w,4.\../t'-., Cff.Cj
e.:,(L 10 ~L B
~'
(,;.) ~ "D:)...... f ~.,'Fy:.. "D5 'i.LJ L ?(L r:yS~~<L_'t ;fl'ov tf-.00 D;/-J. EM(t(JU:>
0,'
r
Tri'r- !}__,T(.lJi/C D J?J).r\fSTC'.' 6Jc...Lcs\v,L{,"';. C.Jf q ~ EC Ie
'f f1(L. C-
7 ,) :'Zg U(r- re
D. .) ,-""" .
j.. v""""\ !:.: C,: (.-
t- I ... l,. ( I ,C .W -,. . 1 -..~ I C
tV. L..- -v ::qifL. ;. ! I p ~ ^J ,I"""L
R;.; ! GDL~G
5~r,[ L-l ll\Je.
f)
~.)
L~, CL. ALL
l:-c/.~ \1 ('\) l400("(.~ i( C.-I' 'j,)"
!~UfV-1 '..."~ """,,0, __ \ '- __.~ ~~.
L.o i A \G-' 1TNi
f' niL, c...
j?r2Vi)C5 C ,) W,4-t L. S 10~ S. (' 1-1-, -:z! r:1r2-T." 11/ 5f?c. 5"'
Parks Division Memorandum- TRC
Subject:
Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning and Zoning Manager
Kevin J Hallahan, Forester I Environmentalist }(B ~
McCraney (SW 14th Place)
New Site Plan - 3rd Review
To:
From:
Date:
May 18,1999
The applicant for the above project has not addressed the previous comments. The project
should continue in the normal review process. There are no additional charges to the applicant
for my review. There were no previous comments.
LEISURE SERVICES: PARKS DIVISION MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mike Rumpf, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ~
Project: McCraney - 2nd Review - New Site Plan
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
May 18, 1999
The Parks Division has reviewed the site plan for McCraney. There are no recreation-
related issues outstanding on this project. The plan may continue through the normal
revIew process.
JW:ad
Parks Division Memorandum- TRC
To:
Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning and Zoning Manager
April 8, 1999
,,~
<6
From:
Kevin J Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Subject:
McCraney SW 30th, Inc.
New Site Plan- lstReview
Date:
. ~~
;.~.,..
,~-,.-<,~"'-
1. The applicant should indicate if there are any existing trees on the site, which will be
preserved in place, or removed and replaced on the landscape plan.
2. The applicant will have to complete the land-clearing permit prior to requesting the first
building permit.
3. The applicant must submit landscape and irrigation plans for the grass median on SW 30th
Ave. abutting the site. The project should continue in the normal review process.
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
ENG 99-069
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf, Acting Planning & Zoning Manager
Raymond F. Davidson, P.E., Acting City Engi~
May 17, 1999
MC CRANEY SW 30TH INC. - (NWSP 99-006) NEW SITE PLAN
2nd REVIEW COMMENTS
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
22. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting, paving,
drainage, cmbing, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies,
such as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, L WDD, DEP and any others, shall be included with yom
permit request.
23. Provide an engineer's certification in writing that drainage will conform with all rules,
regulations, codes, etc. including, but not limited to, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 of these
Land Development Regulations. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2.]
24. Indicate that the existing sidewalks shall be removed and replaced with 6 inch thick sidewalks at
the two driveways. [LDR Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 1O.T.]
25. Provide a site lighting plan. [LDR Chapter 23, Article II.A]
27. Provide an acceptable off-street loading area. [LDR Chapter 2, Section II.J.]
30(a). Show a handicap accessible route from the public sidewalk to the new building entrances.
RFD/ck
Xc: Ken Hall
C:\My Documents\McCraney SW 30th Inc. New Site Plan 2nd Review.doc
DEPARTMENTOFDEVELOPME~}
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 99-070
8
TO:
Michael Rumpf, Planning and Zoning Director . ~
Michael E. Haag, Building Code Permit Administrat~ ~ .
Apn17,1999 V
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
McCraney SW 30t\ Inc - New Site Plan (NWSP 99-006)
1 st review comments
We have reviewed the plans for the above referenced project and recommend that the following
comments be addressed prior to the project being forwarded for Board review:
Buildine Division (site specific and permit comments) - Michael E. Haag (561) 742-6352
1. Add to the site plan (sheet SP1) a labeled symbol that represents the location of the
accessible entrance to each tenant space. Also, add to the site plan a labeled symbol that
represents the location and path of the accessible route that is required from the accessible
parking spaces to the accessible entrance to each tenant space. Add text to the label that
indicates the accessible route is in compliance with Section 4.3 (Accessible Route) and 4.6
(Parking and Passenger Loading Zones) of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building
Construction. Add the following specifications to define the accessible route: Dimension the
width and identify the cross slope and type of material that is proposed for all areas of the
route through its entire length. The Accessibility Code accepts a 1 :50 slope for the cross
slope of an accessible route. Where a change of material occurs along the route, indicate
with a symbol or note that the finish surfaces have the same elevation where the materials
abut.
2. Indicate on the site plan the elevation of the finish surface at each accessible parking space.
Where the accessible route to the building from the accessible parking spaces is not specified
on the plans as flat or level, show, dimension and label the below listed accessible route
components on the plans. The illustration of the accessible route components shall verify
that the difference in elevation from the accessible parking spaces to the finish floor at each
tenant space is in compliance with the Accessibility Code for Building Construction.
a) Location and width of curb cuts.
b) Identify the location, width, slope, cross slope and length of portions of the route that
have a slope that is less than 1 :20 (ex: 1 :21). The Accessibility Code considers surfaces
with a 1 :50 slope as level.
Building Division Memorandum No. 99-070 to Michael Rumpf
RE: McCraney SW 30th, Inc.
April 7, 1999
Page Two
c) Identify the location, width, and slope, cross slope and length of ramps. The
Accessibility Code states that surfaces are considered ramps when they have a slope that
is greater than 1:20 (ex: 1:19).
d) Identify the location, width, length, and slope and cross slope of all landings that are
required at the top and bottom of each ramp. The Accessibility Code considers surfaces
with a 1 :50 slope as level and is acceptable for the landings that are required at ramps
and the level surface that is required at the accessible entrance to a building/tenant space.
e) Where the Accessibility Code indicates a handrail is required, show and label them on
the site plan drawing. Also, provide detail drawings depicting height and shape of the
handrails.
f) Show and identify the shape and slope of thresholds that are used at the accessible
entrances.
3. Identify the finish floor elevation within the footprint of the building that is illustrated on the
site plan (sheet SP1). Add to the site data, found on sheet SP1, the flood zone that the
building is located within including, where applicable, base flood elevation. Add
specifications to the site data that will verify that the proposed finish floor elevation is in
compliance with the minimum standards of the following:
a) Minimum elevation required by the flood zone.
b) Minimum elevation required by the South Florida Water Management District permit for
the project (Lawson Industrial).
c) Not less than six inches above the crown of the abutting right(s)-of-way.
4. At time of permit review, verify that the square footage proposed for the building is in
compliance with the regulations of the Building Code by indicating on the site plan or floor
plan drawing the occupancy classification and type of construction proposed for the building.
The building area, occupancy and type of construction shall comply with the specifications
identified in the Building Code.
5. At time of permit review, identify on the site plan the actual setback dimension from the
leading edge of the north and south face of the building to the north and south property lines.
Please note that the setback dimension shall be measured from the overhang, covered
walkways, canopies or awnings. The building setbacks shall comply with Zoning Code
regulations.
6. On sheet SP 1, identify the symbol that represents the property line.
Building Division Memorandum No. 99-070 to Michael Rumpf
RE: McCraney SW 30th, Inc.
April 7, 1999
Page Three
7. On the elevation view drawings of the building, identify the length of each tenant frontage.
Provide detailed and dimensioned elevation views of the building signage. Identify the total
sign area for each tenant signage including providing computations that verify the signs are
in compliance with the Sign Code. Identify the dimension from the tenant wall line of each
tenant to the edge of the proposed tenant sign. Also, dimension on the elevation view
drawings the distance the sign or signs are located from the top of the wall that they are
attached to. Indicate on the drawing of the building signage whether the sign will be
illuminated and state type of illumination. Drawings of the signage shall comply with the
applicable regulations specified in the Sign Code (Chapter 21 of the Land Development
Regulations) .
8. Add a note to the site plan indicating that the site lighting fixtures will illuminate the site
consistent with the specifications identified in the Parking Lot Code.
9. Correct the inconsistency with respect to the use of the facility. The site data indicates that
the use is Office & Industrial/Warehouse. The title of the drawings, building area data and
use identified within the footprint of the building indicate that the use is Office/Warehouse.
The site data indicates that the ratio of office space to the other uses is 1/3. Therefore, office
will be the use that is used to determine County impact fees for the entire building.
10. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed plans.
11. Compliance with the Building Codes will be evaluated at time of permit review. The permit
fee, water and sewer facility fees, County fees and State fees will be determined at time of
permit review.
MEH:bg
\\CH\MAIN\SHRDA T A \Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 99-006 1 st review McCraney SW 30th,Inc.doc
, ......
ill m@rnnw~ ill
Am - 5 1999
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #99-078
TO:
Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning
FROM:
Al Kim, Sanitation Superintendent
THRU:
C. Larry Roberts, Public Works Di
SUBJ:
New Site Plan - 1st Review - McCraney SW 30th, Inc.
DATE:
April 1, 1999
Listed below are comments from the Public Works Department in reference to the site
plan listed above:
1. As per section 10-25 in the City Code, free dumping access to containers at all
times shall be provided by the user.
2. The dumpster enclosure should be 10 feet by 10 feet internal dimensions. The
gate for the container should be mounted on the outside of the enclosure. The
enclosure should be widened if the gates are to be mounted on the inside.
3. The applicant must supply a detailed drawing of the enclosure with the plans.
4. Waste removal in connection with construction process must be serviced by the
City of Boynton Beach. Place note on dumpster detail to indicate same.
5. Dumpster enclosure gates must be able to open wide.
6. Dumpster enclosure must be bigger ifbollards are to be installed inside the
enclosure.
7. Steel dowels should be installed to hold gates open.
If you have any questions please contact Al Kim, Sanitation Superintendent, weekdays
from 7:00 AM - 3:30 PM.
AKlcr
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 99 - 96
TO:
Mike Rumpf, Planning Director
J~ :,J ~'~~ :~~~~ . - - ~- '~~ !'
: I' ~ II
!dU: APR 8
FROM:
John A. Guidry, Utilities Director
\ .- .. _. -.-
DATE:
March 31, 1999
SUBJECT:
McRaney Office/W arehouse - New Site Plan 1 st Review
We offer the following comments on this project:
GENERAL COMMENTS
1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may
determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree
species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so
that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future.
LD R Sec. 7.5-18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility
services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way.
2) Dept. of HRS permits may be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project. (Sec.
26-12). Water and sewer services to the building are currently not shown.
3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. as
stated in LDR chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater. (see See, 26-16(a)). Please submit these calculations with your HRS permit
submittal.
4) Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project
either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or
expected demand.
5) Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore,
be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available.
6) Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform with all rules of the City and
the South Florida Water Management District. (LDR Chap. 4, sec. 7F)
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
1) Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility
easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum
width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in
Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code.
2) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that
the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note
that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy.
3) LDR chap, 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of
an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by
showing all hydrants.
4) Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building,
and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with Sec. 26-207.
5) A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the construction
plans for the water and sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15)
6) The waste stream from the manufacturing process must meet the City's pretreatment requirements.
A sampling point must be provided to allow monitoring of this waste stream. (Sec. 26-143,26-147)
Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (742-6404) of this office.
JAG/PVM
Xc: Skip Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
ENG 99-043
DATE:
Michael W. Rumpf, Acting Planning & Zoning Manager
Raymond F. Davidson, P.E., Acting City Engin~
March 29, 1999
~~-:\'
\
'! ~\
-
.\i\
\~
~J
TO:
FROM:
t-----..- .
RE:
\
MC CRANEY SW 30TH, INC. - (NWSP 99-006) NEW SITE ~LAN.--
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
We have reviewed the subject plans and offer the following comments that should be addressed prior to
the project being forwarded for Board review:
1. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting, paving,
drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies, such
as FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM, L WDD, DEP and any others, shall be included with your permit
request.
2. Provide an engineer's certification in writing that drainage will conform with all rules, regulations,
codes, etc. including, but not limited to, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 of these Land Development
Regulations. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2.]
3. Indicate that the existing sidewalks shall be removed and replaced with 6 inch thick sidewalks at the
two driveways. [LDR Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10.T.]
4. Provide a site lighting plan. [LDR Chapter 23, Article ILA]
5. Reduce the width of the driveway at the northwest comer of the site to be no greater than 32 feet at
the right-of-way line. [LDR Chapter 23, Article II.H.]
6. Provide off-street loading area. [LDR Chapter 2, Section II.J.]
7. Indicate locations of proposed fire lanes.
8. Eliminate the one parallel parking space at the east side of the building.
9. Provide raised curbing along the west side of the driveway at the west side of the building. [LDR
Chapter 7.5, Section 5.A.]
RFD/ck
Xc: Ken Hall
C:\My Documents\McCraney SW 30th, Inc. New Site Plan 1st Review.doc
FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION
Memorandum No. 99-245
@.~...
,.q,t:'
NFPA Life Safety Code 101, National Fire Code 1, all applicable National Fire
Protection Association codes, and the City Fire code shall be adhered to.
FROM:
Mike Rumpf, Act. Director
Planning & Zoning Division ~
Steve Gale, Fire Marshal ~ .
Deputy Chief - Fire Rescue Dep nt
C.1.m!!.u
fl jj f;
fUlij MAR2S
( "~","-,=-j
i 7'r,~:"';':~'~U"I~D
_VllJ!!VI.J u:.:.PT.
TO:
DATE: March 26,1999
t,
,
SUBJECT: McCraney SW 30th Inc.
SW 14 Place
NWSP 99-006
Water mains and fire department connections are not shown. A minimum turning
radius of 45 feet must also be shown. No part of the structure may be more than
200 feet from a hydrant. A fire flow test is required; LOR 6-16.
These plans are not complete and should not be forwarded.
CC:
File
- -'
. ~ynton Beach FireRescue
Fire and Life Safety Division
~
Plan Review Checklist
I.
Site Plan
1. Water Flow Requirements - 150' to siamese 300' apart.
A. Hydrants on site
B. GPM fire flows
C. Water main sizes
2. Fire Lanes
3. Siamese Connections (not over green area)
4. Access/Gates
5. Roadways meet Fire Rescue needs
Steve Gale
Fire Marshal .
Deputy QUef of Operations
@-.
.;J
II.
Master Plan
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-0310
Boynton Beach Fire Rescue
Off. (561) 742-661
Fax (561) 364-7:>
Pager: 885-75
1. Roads
2. Hydrants
LEISURE SERVICES: PARKS DIVISION MEMORANDUM
TO:
Michael Rumpf, Planning & Zoning Director
RE:
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Me Craney SW 30", Ine.jJ
March 26, 1999
FROM:
DATE:
Leisure Services, Parks Division, has reviewed the site plan for Mc Craney SW 30, Inc.
There are no recreation-related issues outstanding on this project. The plan may continue
through the normal review process.
JW:ad
~~~~;ID
PLr);:.,~NG I\NO
ION!NG ucPl
EPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 99-081
TO:
TRC MEMBERS
Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Sgt. Eric Jensen, Police Department
Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department
Michael Haag, Building Division
Ken Hall, Engineering Division
AI Kim, Public Works Department
John Wildner, Parks Division
Ray Davidson, Acting City Engineer
Bob Donovan, Permit Application Group
FROM:
/1/ .--/
.~ -<-_
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
DATE:
March 24, 1999
RE:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1 ST Review - New Site Plan
Project - Mc Craney SW 30th, Inc.
Location - SW 14th Place
Agent Richard Sum, Architect - The Sun Group
File No. NWSP 99-006
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the
plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments to me no later than 5:00 P.M. on April 7.
1999. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code
deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance
the project.
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the
applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review
and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the
exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is
insufficient to properly. evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the
documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by
the reviewer by contacting Scott Barber.
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the
documents.
4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or
when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with
other departmental improvements.
5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the
comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name
of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time
frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that
they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the
project be forwarded through the approval process.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to me for distribution to the applicant. Please
include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum. Scott Barber will be the
Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review comments will be
transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC) members.
MWR:jma
Attachment
xc: William Bingham, Fire Chief
Marshall Gage, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Don Johnson, Building Division
Sebastian Puda, Engineering Division
Larry Roberts, Public Works Director
Central File
J:ISHRDA TAIPLANNINGISHARED\WP\PROJECTSIMC CRANEY\1STREVIEW-PLANS.DOC
~,,\
[a"l
.\\essler & Ass..~IR'es
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
11211 Prosperity Farms Rd., Suite C-301. Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
Phone (561) 627-2226 Fax (561) 624-1569
Drainage Statement
For
McCraney Warehouse
Lot 14, Lawson Industrial Park
Boynton Beach, FL
May 13, 1999
The proposed facility is to be a 19,980 SF office/warehouse complex located on
lot 14 of Lawson Industrial Park. The parcel consists of approximately 1.4:t
acres and is located on the southwest comer of SW 30 Ave and 14 th Place.
Lawson Industrial Park has a master water management system inplace that
has been approved by South Florida Water Management District and the City
Of Boynton Beach. The water management system is designed to handle both
water quantity and quality. The one additional requirement is the warehouse
project will be required to provide dry pre-treatment for the first one half inch
of runoff. On the west boundary of lot 14 is a retention area that is part of the
master drainage system.
The project drainage system will be comprised of a series of catch basins
connected by pipes with an outfall into a the retention area located along the
project's west boundary line. This area is part of Master Drainage System.
Water quality and quantity for this project will be obtained through this
System as is consistent with all projects within the industrial park. In addition
to the master system, the site will the required dry pre-treatment through the
use of on-site exfiltration trenches. The exfiltration trenches will be connected
through a series of pipes and control structures to the existing retention along
the west property line.
The project will be designed in accordance with the requirements of the South
Florida Water Management District permit and The City of Boynton Beach. The
project will be permitted through the appropriate govemment agencies.
~~
Timoth J. Messler, P.E.
Florida Certificate #16422
McCRANEY
THE SUN GROUP
Architects
:.: ::.. :..:": ::.:::.:.. ::.:..: :.:'...: .::::'.: ":::::::'.:": :.:::: :::::'.. ',::::,' -. . :'::'.: .:::..:'. . :;::-:....:::. .::,", .....:..:.::...: '. :..: : ":..: ::.. : . .,' ..:. . - .. . .:: .
:::;'}:i~::Jljr;t0::EJ:p:.::i::::(f\-;t4;:::::jI?;D{:A::~T:~:{\:II;1;:tJ]:1'2:!A:j[l;.:::!::n:':::':::.::.::.::t:::hu.!::!U.:::.\::..: :.:: :..i::.:::.:::.::::.:.::.::. ...;.: ::: :..:::.
...-LIlli.tlll.t_t:+~~iI1tIJj.LIX1,.,,'JJ1U1J~~.......1Im1~:J{':i~:illY~~m~IJ}tII~:~Ili........... ............... ........... ......... ,.. ..... ......,...,... ..... .". ........ ........ ....
~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~~;~:t::::::t~~.~:;::::{~::::'::::::::::::i;i~;::::::~::::::::t~~~~:::::'::::~. ~:~::::.:::}t~:?f:;::::f:::~::::::~:::::::::::t:::::: ;.::: : :'~:!:~;~}::::::::.:::}::::::i:::::i.: :- ;:(;'; ::::;:{ ::::::))::::::::j~~:::{t::::::~::::::::::::~:fIt~)?~~~;i;~~ri:)~~~~~:~ff}ttr/?(!:i{:?r)~:f!: ~~~.~ ~~~).~ !:~:~. ;).;:~ ~:~~~ t~:! ;~~.~ ;:~ ~?t:~- ~ ; ;~;.~.;
TO: "...,Mra' ,:"..J}1~~--...~rF7".C.~t~..
....,...,.. ,~.:t..""''''''--''''''''''''''''''.''''.'..''.''':IL.:.........f}...",...........
..".... ..~.~.~......,,~ntm....~.m............
DA TE: ..."....,"21..1.1:l0.:1........r.......................1,.,."'........'"
PROJECT: .......,~.n.tcm.....~..k14:V.~rL. ~.
RE: ..............,................,..."..............R~k....Lat.l,r
....".........~...........".........,,~.........'........................-...-......... ............................... ....... ... ......... .................. ......
TRANSMI'ITED VIA ~ Deliver
o Mail
o Pick Up
o Express Courier
:~~:r~~::~~N:Qf.Bgjf~;~:y:.:1)H:~:[.f:g~~g~~N~:.i~:lt~M~;t~:!:
....'..-.........................................(............ ............................-........,...~..........................................................~,.......................................................,.............................................................................................................................................................................'..........................-.....................,................................................~.................................
iCOl"'IESI. . DESCRIPTION j
r:]i:::::::::::!:::::fiY~::::::::p~;.::::;:::::::::::::1\r4~::::::::~;~:::::::~::~~a::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1
.. ! .
. .
. .
[~j~~~:~~~:~:'~:~:iii::1
; ! :
' .
' .
i I :
L::::::::::::::::::::::!::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1
TH~SE RE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
o or Your Use 0 As Requested
For Review & Comment 0 Approved As Noted
o Revise & Resubmit
o
~~.~:;:;::;:~~;;::~~
.................................-................_................-..........................................................'............................................................................................................................................................
......................-.........................-................................................................................;...:.t:.................................................................................-...................................................................
................................................................................,........M.........'................._......'........'.!......h.....;.........................................................................................................................
.........................-..........................................................-.-.........................-................................-...-...............................................................................................................-......-...................................
. .
.-......................'..........................................................................................................................................-..................................................................'..-......................................................................
I
f' .
,-
Copy To:
,
.j ~
'. :," l
· . ._ Sl~ned: . c.W ~
.' - .- .... .. . ,. ...... . ! , .. .- ., .. .-.
900 Ehst Indiantoi....11 R.oad, <Silitc III Jupiter, Florida :)3477tcl<"'Phonc$61.746.7706 fhcsimilc 561.746.7478
APPLICATION TRACKING LOG
PROJECT TITLE: McCraney FILE N: 99-006
PROJECT LOCATION: SW t 4th Place
TYPE OF APPLICATION: New Site Plan
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED: (YIN) REVIEWER'S NAME
AGENT: The Sun Group ADDRESS:
AGENT PHONE: FAX:
DATE REC'D: 3/23/99 AMOUNT:
RECEIPT NO.:
t 2 SETS OF PRE-ASSEMBLED PLANS SUBMllTED FOR REVIEW:
2 OF t 2 SETS SIGNED AND SEALED 0
SURVEY 0
LANDSCAPE PLAN 0
FLOOR PLAN 0
SITE PLAN WITH SITE DATA 0
APPLlCATION/SUBMllTAL: DATE ACCEPTED:
DRAINAGE PLAN
ELEVATION VIEW DRAWINGS
COLORED ELEVATIONS RECEIVED
MATERIAL SAMPLES RECEIVED
PHOTOGRAPHS RECEIVED
DATE DENIED:
o
o
o
o
o
DATE OF LElTER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES:
DATE OF SUBMllTAL ACCEPTANCE LElTER:
INITIAL t ST REVIEW MEMO: DATE SENT:
MEMO NO.
t ST REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED
UTIL.
P.W.
PARKS
FIRE
POLICE
PLANNING
'8EBIG/ENGR
FORESTER
\d '::1 'f
DATE OF LElTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS:
RETURN DATE:
90-DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID:
DATE t 2 COMPLETE (ASSEMBLED) SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMllTED FOR 2ND REVIEW:
PRE-ASSEMBLED PLANS SUBMllTED FOR REVIEW:
AMENDED APPLICATION 0
2 OFt2 SETS SIGNED AND SEALED 0
SURVEY 0
LANDSCAPE PLAN 0
FLOOR PLAN 0
SITE PLAN WITH SITE DATA 0
2ND REVIEW MEMO: DATE SENT:
DRAINAGE PLAN
ELEVATION VIEW DRAWINGS
COLORED ELEVATIONS RECEIVED
MATERIAL SAMPLES RECEIVED
TRANSPARENCY RECEIVED
PHOTOGRAPHS RECEIVED
MEMO NO.
2nd REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED
PLA illS MEMON DATE PLA ~ MEMON DATE
UTIL. .J POLICE lJi
P.W. I PLANNING r...
PARKS 11./ BLDG/ENGR 0
FIRE FORESTER r;;;r
o
o
o
o
o
o
~~d
ttll<../ '1~
RETURN DATE:
~&
)' - <:.~ [j)
BOARD MEETING DATE:
LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY. DATE SENT 1 SIGNS INSTALLED:
BOARD:
CITY COMMISSION: DATE:
DEVELOPMENT ORDER RECEIVED FROM CITY CLERK: 0 DATE:
DATE:
S:\FORMS\TRACKING LOG FORM - 3/98
DEVELOPMENT ORDER SENT TO APPLICANT: 0 DATE: