LEGAL APPROVAL
DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT NAME: VILLA DEL SOL
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Bradley D. Miller, AICP
....
.
~ U~~1! Jl~-
i i
.L=-,
4:;f,M~ ?
U t: ?
-;
"~--j'
.-:.......
~~.........<:
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 6 Ramland Road, Orangeburg, NY
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION:
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Amendment to Comprehensive Plan Text
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Northwest corner of the intersection of Federal Highway (US 1) and Old
Dixie Highway.
DRAWING(S): NA
THIS MA ITER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows:
OR
X THIS MA ITER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
LHAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included".
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
L GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
7. Other Transmittal of the amendments to the Deoartment of Communitv ~JJafl'SI~'fJl//1
review in accordance with Chaoter 163 F.S. ~"<oo:.~.:..?J\t :/-/~
~ (~ ~ '< ....~OA..1~... ~ ~
DATED: /~~#9P ~~~~.....,.....~O..~O ~\~~
City Clerk ~ ~ i- ! :t: ~
J:\SHRDATAIPllI.V'IIMQ1SHAREDlWPlPROJECTSlVllLA DEL SOL CPTA & lUARIOO CC 12-21-99.doe ~ (j \... "\ 92.0 .l ff
~ .... .... S-
~ ..........,.. ~
~/. FlOf\\O '!..".:$f-
'11111"" 1111\\\\\\\\
DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT NAME: VILLA DEL SOL
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Bradley D. Miller, AICP
....
.
.. l": {"!'-.
r~L_,
4:;f,M~ ?
. !
-'
,_' ',~--J I
'---. ~~><-1
APPLICANTS ADDRESS: 6 Ramland Road, Orangeburg, NY
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION:
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Amendment to Comprehensive Plan Text
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Northwest corner of the intersection of Federal Highway (US 1) and Old
Dixie Highway.
DRAWING(S): NA
THIS MA ITER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows:
OR
X THIS MA ITER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
LHAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included".
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
L GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
7. Other Transmittal of the amendments to the Department of Communitv ~tfafl'SIf\;"111111
review in accordance with Chapter 163 F.S. #"<oo~.~.:'.?~ ;/-/%
~ (~ ~ <<. ,,'~~OA..1f." ~ ~
'DATED: /~~#9P . ~:~~"""""'!~:'Ro ~\~~l
City Clerk :: I- : - : :t: ==
J:ISHRDATAIPIannIMQISHAREDIVvP\PROJECTSlVllLA DEL SOL CPTA & lUARIOO CC 12-21-99,doe ~ (j ',- "\ 920 ./ :2
~ -... .... ~
~ .......... '" ~
~//. FlOf\\O '!..,,~
'11111"" 1111\\\\\\\\
EXHIBIT "I"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: VILLA DEL SOL
File number: CPT A # 99-002
Reference:.Future Land Use Text Amendment application prepared bv Miller Land Planning Consultants. Inc.
dated October 1. 1999
.
.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
X
1. The site design requirements should include variable north and south
setbacks based on project height:
a) North side adjacent to residential district only
1) 1 story - 40 feet
2) 2 stories - 45 feet
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
3) 3 stories - 60 feet
4) 4 stories - 100 feet
b) South side adjacent to residential ~istrict only
1) 1 story = 40 feet .
2) 2 stories - 40 feet
3) 3 stories - 75 feet
4) 4 stories - 100 feet
X
2. The perimeter landscaping on the north and south sides shall include at
minimum, a hedge, 1 canopy tree spaced no greater than 20 feet, and
additional landscaping of varying height placed between trees. The
landscaping to be placed along the rights-of-way shall include serpentine
berm varying in height. A combination of palm and deciduous/canopy
trees densely spaced with a diversity of plant materials from ground covers
at varying height placed within the buffer.
X
3. Signage shall be compatible (in scale) with adjacent residential properties
and be designed in conjunction with materials to be repeated along the
perimeter such as posts, fence elements, small monument features, etc.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
4. None
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
5. 'f.o bG dGtcrmiRea. ~ er ~
MWRldim
J:\SHRDATAIPLANNINGISHAREDIVllP\PROJECTSIVllLA DEL SOL CPTA & lUARICOND, OF APPROVAl P&D 12-14-99,DOC
DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT NAME: VILLA DEL SOL
APPLICANTS AGENT: Bradley D. Miller, AICP
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 6 Ramland Road, Orangeburg, NY
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: /"#~j'
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Future Land Use Map and Rezoning
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Northwest corner of the intersection of Federal Highway (US 1) and Old
Dixie Highway.
DRAWING(S): NA
THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows:
OR
X THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
LHAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit .C" with notation "Included".
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
L GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
, ,\\ ~ iI, : I Ii "
7. Other Transmittal of the amendments to the Department of Communitv ~~s..lfol),V"//0~/,
review in accordance with Chapter 163 F.S. ~ '0 ....;;O.R4.;:..&~ ~~
~. _ //.,.-,~ I ~ g J .{oy-'r '1<'0\ "0 ~
DATED: /A~~9" ~./21'~'~ ~./~....:::>-i~ i:J:~
City Clerk ~ ~ \ 0 i 2
J:ISHRDATAIPlanningISHAREDIWPlPROJECTS\VllLA DEL SOL CPTA & lUARIDO CC 12-21-99,doc ~" .. "\ 9'2.:./ :::
~ -.. ..- ~
~ .......... Q ~ "
0,.// F l 0 ?\ , ,\."~
1111 ,.,\
, 1/11/11\\\\\"
EXHIBIT "I"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: VILLA DEL SOL
File number: LUAR # 99-005
Reference:.Future Land Use Amendment and Rezoning application prepared bv Miller Land Planning
Consultants. Inc. dated October 1. 1999
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
-
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments: NONE
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
1. NONE
I ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
, 2. T. ~e dot_iRed, -<""'''''
MWR/dim
J:ISHRDATAIPlANNINGISHAREDIWP\PRDJECTS\VllLA DEL SOL CPTA & lUARICOND. OF APPROVAl P&D 12.14.99.DOC
~
I I
Response to Objections, Recommendations And Comments Report
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment
City of Boynton Beach
Amendment 00-1 ER
I. Consistency with Chapter 163, F.S., and Rule 9J-S & 9-11, F.A.C.
The City of Boynton Beach, in Palm Beach County, has proposed a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, based on the City's Evaluation and Appraisal
Report (EAR) adopted on April 1, 1997. The proposed Amendment consists of
updating all of the Elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan as anticipated in
the EAR. The proposed EAR-based Amendment includes four Future Land Use
Maps (FLUM) changes. The City has also proposed a non-EAR related FLUM
change. The City proposed to adopt this Amendment in May of June of 2000. The
Department has identified the following objections to the proposed Amendment:
A. EAR-based Amendment
Transportation Element
Objection 1. The Transportation Element does not include future transportation
maps identifying the major public transit trip generators and attractors
based upon the future land use map; and the projected peak hour levels of
service for transportation facilities for which level of service standards are
established.
Response: The MPO generated 2020 throughfare system and 2020 pedestrian
facilities are included as support documents. The Public Transit System
Map implicitly indicates the location of major public transit trip generators
and attractors at various terminals. The map will be expanded, however, to
explicitly indicate the trip generators and attractors based on the Future
Land Use Map. The projected peak hour level of service is contained in
the Evaluation and Appraisal Report as Map 2.9.
Objection 2. The Transportation Element support documentation indicated that
transit market share for Tri-County Rail and Palm- Tran, as well as
pedestrian and bicycle facilities, would have to increase in the City
through transportation demand management (TDM) strategies in order to
modify peak-hour travel demand. However, the City did not include a
policy in this Element establishing TDM programs.
Response: An explicit TDM oriented policy to establish a transportation
management organization as an implementing vehicle for the TDM will be
added above and beyond what is implicitly indicated in Objective 2.7 and
2.8, pending the City's concurrence with the costs and Staff implication of
a TDM public/private partnership and responsibilities.
City of Boynton Beach, Florida
Response to Objections, Recommendations, & Comments Report
Amendment OO-lER
Date: June 6, 2000
Page I of5
Objection 3. Proposed Objective 2.4 of the Transportation Element states: The
City shall develop and maintain a safe, convenient, and energy efficient
multi-modal transportation system which will meet future as well as
current trans needs. The City has provided an inventory of existing
intermodal facilities, but not an analysis of the deficiencies or projected
needs. These data and analysis will assist the City in addressing the need
for additional terminals, connections, high occupancy vehicle lanes; and
pedestrian, bicycle, park-and-ride and other facilities based on land use
projections to facilitate effective implementation of this objective.
Response: The analysis presented within the EAR is adequate and it will be
incorporated in the text and maps of the support documents by reference.
Additionally, transportation concurrency management map(s) will be
expanded to address the Department's concerns.
Comment. The transportation map series do not include the appropriate titles,
legend, map scale and the preparation or revision date. The inclusion of
this information will improve the usefulness of these maps in the City's
planning efforts and enhance citizen's understanding of these maps,
because the maps can be properly referenced.
Response: The map series were intended to update and/or augment the maps
already in the EAR and not necessarily to substitute them. The maps
presented however, did and do contain appropriate titles and legends. They
will be expanded and improved upon, however, to adequately address the
Department's concerns.
Planning Timeframe
Comment. The City projected its population and public facility capacities and
needs to 2015 in the EAR. The proposed Comprehensive Plan EAR-based
Amendment and support data and analysis have been based on the 2015
timeframe. However, the City did not include in the plan or on the FLUM
any planning timeframe, either short-term, medium-term, or long-term, toe
support the proposed goals, objectives and policies in the Comprehensive
Plan. We recommend the City should include at least two planning periods
in the Comprehensive Plan, one for at least the first five-year period and
one for at least an overall ten-year period.
Response: The Transportation Element addresses appropriate planning
timeframes (Policy 2.2.1) for transportation improvements.
City of Boynton Beach, Florida
Response to Objections, Recommendations, & Comments Report
Amendment OO-IER
Date: June 6, 2000
Page 2 of5
B. Non EAR-based Amendment
Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment (LUAR #99-005: Villa Del Sol)
Objection. The Amendment does not restrict development activities where such
activities do not protect human life by directing population concentrations
away from known or predicted coastal high hazard areas. Additionally, the
proposed Amendment is internally inconsistent with Policy 1.21.1 of the
Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan which
requires the City to obtain written approvals from the Palm Beach County
Division of Emergency Management and the City of Boynton Beach Risk
Management Officer, "prior to approving any increase in residential
densities in the Hurricane Evacuation Zone...if the proposed density
increase would result in an increase of 50 or more dwellings." The City
has not supported the proposed FLUM Amendment with such \\'Titten
approvals. Moreover, the City has not demonstrated the consistency of the
proposed FLUM Amendment with Objective 7.6 of the Coastal
Management Element of its Comprehensive Plan, regarding the City's
commitment to maintain or reduce current estimated hurricane evacuation
times if development increases in the coastal high-hazard area of the City.
The City did not provide analysis of the projected impact of anticipated
population density of the proposed additional 148 dwelling units and
potential evacuation needs of the population on hurricane evacuation
planning.
Response: City staff made two errors in its review comments on the application
for amendment. The first was to reference the location of the amendment
as being a part of Map location #16 in Table 24 of the Coastal
Management Element. The referenced map location is on the east ofU. S.
Highway 1, while the subject parcel is on the west of that thoroughfare. In
an early draft of support documents for the Coastal Management Element,
the subject property was identified as Map location #17 and corresponding
policy direction in Table 24 provided setback requirements for
development of the site under a Special High Density Residential
designation. The map and policy references were removed from the final
version of the support documents when it was decided to recognize the
development order in place for the property in 1989 and maintain the
commercial land use designation on the site.
Staff s second error was to recommend that the proposed amendment
would be forwarded to the County EMD for review. This is required
when a site is located within the Hurricane High Hazard Zone and impacts
of the increased density reach thresholds established in the Land Use
Element of the Comprehensive Plan. While the parcel is within the City's
adopted Coastal Planning Area, it is west of the line delineating the
Hurricane High Hazard Zone. It is staff s understanding that under Rule
91-5.003(18), F.A.C., the coastal planning area does not need to be
City of Boynton Beach, Florida
Response to Objections, Recommendations, & Comments Report
Amendment OO-lER
Date: June 6, 2000
Page3of5
coterminous with the Coastal High Hazard Area so long as all of the
Coastal High Hazard Area is included within the planning area.
Emergency Support Function 18 - PUBLIC SAFETY of the Palm Beach
County Comprehensive Emergency Alanagement Plan details the
geographic areas contained within each Traffic Evacuation Zone for
hurricane evacuation. The boundaries for each zone are repeated from the
Treasure Coast Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study. Zones 11, 12 and
13 encompass areas of the City of Boynton Beach; however, the zone in
closest proximity to the subject parcel is Zone 13. Its boundaries are
described as, "South of Ocean Avenue, east of U. S. 1, north of Gulf
Stream Golf Course, west of Atlantic Ocean." Evacuation Zone 13 is
classified as the Storm Surge Vulnerable Zone for all hurricanes. (See
Attachment A)
The subject parcel is located west of U.S. Highway 1, and therefore is not
within the Hurricane High Hazard area, defined in Rule 9J-5.003(17),
F.A.C. as "the evacuation zone for a Category 1 hurricane as established
in the regional hurricane evacuation study applicable to the local
goverrunent. "
Even though the property is not located within the Hurricane High Hazard
area, staff requested that the Palm Beach County Emergency Management
Division review the amendment and provide comments. Their response
indicates that the site is not designated as an evacuation area in the event
of a Category 1 storm. (See Attachment B, paragraph 4)
II. Consistency with the State Comprehensive Plan
The proposed Amendment does not adequately address and further the following
goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 187, F.S.:
1. Goal (7) Public Safety. Policy 25, regarding local governments adopting
plans and policies to protect public and private property and human lives
from the effects of natural disasters.
Response: Evacuation routes, as sho\NTI, addresses the concerns contained with
this Goal as it relates to transportation.
2. Goal (20) Transportation. Policies 10 & 15, regarding promotion of ride
sharing by public and private sector employees; and promotion of
effective coordination among various modes of transportation in urban
areas to assist urban development and redevelopment efforts.
Response: An explicit TDM oriented policy to establish a transportation
management organization as an implementing vehicle for the TDM will be
added above and beyond what is implicitly indicated in Objective 2.7 and
City of Boynton Beach, Florida
Response to Objections, Recommendations, & Comments Report
Amendment OO-lER
Date: June 6, 2000
Page 4 of5
2.8, pending the City's concurrence with the costs and Staff implication of
a TDM public/private partnership and responsibilities.
City of Boynton Beach, Florida
Response to Objections, Recommendations, & Comments Report
Amendment OO-IER
Date: June 6, 2000
Page 5 of 5
I j-I
1_-- I
,
,
___....J
MlH6l Fe
~ -----
I
I
L__,
i
,
I
,_J
/
I
UJ
U
[5 2'2 AYE
~
j
BOYN1ON FD
?..:r-l
BOYNTON: B CH
~ I:
~II
I
I
I
I
I
L.,
I
I
l
,
--..
r____________J
I
I
I
E! I
e I
~I:
"'L
I L-_____________
---- CITY LIMITS
HYPOLUXO RD
: / 'I
V i~
I~ I
Ie:: I
Igr
ij'i
r--.J :
'---
a:
a:
x
'"
u
BLVD
UJ
>
...
tIl
tIl
lU
a:
l.D
Z
<:>
u KOOLBRI6HT AD
LEG END
I~~~~ HURRICANE EVACUATION ZOSE
l:;;
,
L -1 d
~
I !i
I
I
IIINEFI ~
L!1
aJ
I
f-l
c
>
--'
a::
I-
en
UJ
c:
u
-<
w
Ul
BOYNTON BEACH COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
FIGURE 19 - HURRICANE EVACU~TION ZONE
- 96-
ATTACHMENT A
I
I
~
~
~
C,J
~
C.)
"-1
J.-..
~
~
'...t
J.-..
~
~
N. T.S.
WALTER H. KELLER JR., INC.
Consl/ltJ"ng Engineers If Planners
Coral Springs, Florida
Department of Public Safety
Emergency Management
20 S Military Trail
\Vesr Palm Beach. FL 33415-3130
(561) 712.6400
F.-\.X (561) 712.6464
wwwco.palm-beachfl.us
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Maude Ford Lee. Chair
Warren H. Newell. Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Mary McCarey
Burt :\aronson
Tony Masllotri
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
"Ar. Equal Opporrunity
Aff'YY'1an"e Acrion Employl'f'"
@ printed on recycled paper
ATTACHMENT 8
frDl-'~' ~~;. " -~:;"-f:-~~-
t r' '.- f? (I \. i:- .--
- ~.J ....:: .: . ; .:
II n r----....~--. .-- . ..
j' 1.J0( I
;!n1l 'M 12'-'
" 11!.AV
, " ~ t HI
."~-J
1 L____:_H__"
May 9,2000
Dick Hudson, Senior Planner
Divison of Planning & Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Dear Mr. Hudson:
This letter is in response to your correspondence of April 12, 2000
relative to the proposed change in land use designation for the 16 acre
Villa del Sol site to "Special High Density Residential. U
The Division of Emergency Management has not established or
documented a formal policy on development in designated evacuation
zones. Typically, we defer to the judgment of appropriate Zoning and
Planning officials to establish and enforce such policies.
Palm Beach County's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan
does not contain specific wording relative to the prohibition or
discouragement of development in evacuation areas.
However, page 4-13 of the Palm Beach County's "Unified Local
Mitigation Strategy," states that the County, through its Coastal
Management Element, has established the public policy of not
subsidizing new and expanded development in coastal areas. It further
states that it is the County's position that population concentrations be
directed away from known or predicted coastal high hazard areas, and it
discourages increases in population densities that negatively impact
hurricane evacuation times.
We are not aware of any designation of the proposed site as a high
hazard coastal area, nor do we have any specific information on what
impacts the proposed population densities would have on evacuation
clearance times.
We would clearly not favor any residential development in surge areas
that would present a threat to public safety or lead to repetitive property
loss claims. As best we can determine from the maps provided, it
appears the eastern half of the subject site is in, or borders on, a
Category 5 storm surge zone. The eastern most portion of the site
appears to be in a Category 3 surge zone.
Dick Hudson - Page 2 of 2
Should approval of the land use designation change be granted, we would hope that
developers, property managers, and/or residents would take appropriate steps to mitigate the
risks of hurricane force winds and surge associated with near coastal locations.
I hope these comments are of some assistance in your decision process.
Respectfully,
~~~
Palm Beach County Emergency Management
s:. ~
c w
~~
s:. s:.
?'-I ~
c
0:4
<
~.
<
",'
~\~~-
~....~_ ~~::t~~~ ___ ~__ --: _____-
---- ~ -----=- S3'O')'-J~S ~ ..- ""-~:-=-- ~--- ~ ~---- ;::
_ a/\la..~.:- ---~~<l')'<i~S ~ ---======-
- .-----'----- ~. ____~ ----==:=.at--1B .;.
===-----::--------- ~ ------ ~ -=- - ~~-::::.----:::.
~ __ ~ - ~ ------ __________~ -::- ~ ::: =- ,----- '~ ------- ~ c.-
---::::=:-: ~ -------~..-- ~-~ -- - --- ~ - - :;: ~
~')~~ - ~ --------- ~ ----~~~~ ~-===- ~:-~ .' ~';"-=-./'"~ --==--...- ~
- _~ ------ _ ~-<r;:::, ;;<n -~ ~-~-// ..-
~ "__ _ __~ ~ -.:!Y ~-""'-_ ;~, _~_~ ......------ ---,
_ I!r ~ ~ - ----- --- ~ - d ?:J'X'C:'- -
- .$~ -~~~:) ~~- ~ '-~ ~ ~:) ~ '~
--- --; --------- ---- ~ ---- '/;~ -- ~
'1 ~ ~..::::::- ,~;:... -_. - :: <~ __ -
~- ___ __ __ --:::::- -' --=::: x ___ :.:-rrt -------
:;.-- --- --- ~ ~ __ '..r- ~~~ .-. ~ --:.- ---~-- ---- -- ------
---- -- . - - " -- - ," - - --, - -,'~', "'-..J~NO""" -= -----
___ :t. .:::.:::- - ?,__,_ -- g __ -- -~- S:lol,o. I -l - --
--~----~-'t-:==-~: '~;-~ - ~''.g. 3^'<i~~ ::--:------
_____ =. ___ -=- 1J-1 __ -:.:- ~ . -=-'3- ~ l"i , ~ .----:..:--- ~ ~
~ - '- .~ =-- - ---= - - -
...------.--' '-:;;~- -- ,- ......-: - ,-- ~
---- < ..---::: -";;:;;"0') -- ,~. ..---..-- ~",--::
------ '-' -z; SSJ~':.)' ~ ~-: ~~---:::- - __ ------ -=-.--' ~
o --- __ .-.::..- ::=.- - -----
~' -- ~
--- f - ~----- -----..... ...,.,...--< ::-- .-, - .-.--: _ --
r- '--=-
:: 0 ---' --- ------- '-
-----:. ~~ ~
--- ---.:::: :=::-~ --- --- - -
- --- ------=:: ~ -::.---
" ~~~- ~', ------::~~ ./------.:-
--- ,.,... ..------~ ~>~-
r'
---- "
~
----::::.--- ---
::'-~
--
-----
/,'
--
--=
-~
--/"
",-'
/--
--
,
..-
~ ~....,,,\':r~i.\'1\
(Jc-::.....\_ - -::
...--- ...-:-'~ s:
--=:.~s.===-
~-== -:-::---::.
~,. ~ ::-
.-:~~ - -- ----- ~
--- - --:.-- ~~- ----- -------==--
':-- :::'----:=?-
~~~'~
2 = -~~
~t\~
a~~OI ,
-::::
...--
v _____-::;;
- -- ~
,.~~
~'
------
--
\--~...--:.
. ,-
-~.
~. -:1---.- -=- --
I'-~~
-:;::.
/
;::::-
----
------
-~--:0~-
-=-- - --~ ~~-~-
_./--
--
---
------
,---
--:::- --:----
.:
~ --::=::
1~-'-~
-- -----
-===- ~
::::::-.::=~
----
'-'-;
Q
u
:---
~.
~-.-- .===
---
-.-------
-c'
~.~:
- --
-~
~-
~
----- ~'
--------- - "
:; ~-=- - ~~
-~ -' - .--::::;:$---: ~~-' -=-
- -=.\ =-- --::::::- ::. - - - ~ --
\ -:::;---~ --- '. ~ ~ ...------:
- - ~~\ -- -- ----~ ~-~-==-==-- ----~~
----- -- \ ---=:::::--====\ .-------=----- --- .--
~ --I O~--- - .--
---------=- -----' -- /: -::-- ------~
- -~-~
,~ --':::-----
__ ,...- -=:=-_:I:
-~
_/~
~:~.~~~~
~, ~-
-- ~-
~-- - ::.>;::::'
- -' .-----: -
---- ~- ----- ,. -
,--
\~
-----------
---'
---
----
'Z
o
I--
Z.
-:::)"'"
-----
------
~----------
--::::.----
,/
--
-;;;j''>-
Facsimile
TAANSMITT AL
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
P.O. BOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310
FAX: (561) 742-6259
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
to:
fax #:
date:
from:
re:
pages:
BfQd,
1k1{
q //tal
!Jatrfy
-/fa t1 t1 Q
5 ro d h / / / t' r
56/- :L 7:l - I 04:2
-.3i/Q
~~hI16 ~Q+ro()
-1 , including cover sheet.
17Pf /11(' tOfl/CJ ~ OUZ
.j h.R 7<" N,N i. "'i ~"~ r/".
eA!fJU fI/1); e t1/UM .
kl-k?.J 7t DC,4
Planning and Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
742-6260
Fox: 742-6259
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Division of Planning and Zoning
Building
Planning & Zoning
Engineering
Occupational License
Community Redevelopment
December 30, 1999
Mr. Tom Beck
Bureau of Local Planning
Florida Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
Re: City of Boynton Beach
EAR-Based and Non EAR-Based Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
Dear Mr. Beck:
We are pleased to submit the EAR-Based amendments for the City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan. Also included with this submittal is one non EAR-Based Future Land Use
Map (FLUM) amendment and the related text amendment. The City Commission / Local
Planning Agency held a properly noticed public hearing on December 21, 1999, at which time
they approved transmittal of the above referenced amendments.
Please be advised that the EAR-Based Amendments addressing siting of public school facilities
and Intergovernmental Coordination have been reviewed by the Department of Community
Affairs and are scheduled for adoption by the Boynton Beach City Commission on January 11,
2000. The site specific FLUM amendment and related text involve a change from General
Commercial to Special High Residential category for a 16 acre site.
Changes proposed in the amendments:
. are not, nor do they affect, An Area of Critical State Concern;
. are not exceptions to the twice yearly limitation for plan amendments as noted in F .S.
163.3177(h)(4);
. are not proposed to be adopted under a joint planning agreement pursuant to Chapter
163.3171, F.S.; and,
. have been submitted to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, South Florida Water
Management District, Florida Department of Transportation, and Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (see attached letters).
America's Gateway to the Gulfstream
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6260 FAX: (561) 742-6259
Copies of the entire Comprehensive Plan have been sent to all the agencies listed in 91-11.008(9)
(a).
The contact person for information regarding the amendment is:
Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
Telephone: (561) 742-6261
Fax: (561) 742-6259
Six copies of all documentation for the proposed amendments are provided for your review. As
stated above, separate transmittals have been sent to the other required agencies.
Should you have any questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
J '1
0<. U5-IA ~v t=-
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
MWR/nl
Attachments
cc: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
South Florida Water Management District
Florida Department of Transportation
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
nSHRDATAIPlanning\SHARED\WPIPROJECTS\DCA LEGAL NOTICE ADIEAR.doc
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Division of Planning and Zoning
Building
Planning & Zoning
Engineering
Occupational License
Community Redevelopment
December 30, 1999
Joseph M. Yesbeck, P.E.,
District Director- Transportation Planning Office,
Department of Transportation, District 4
3400 West Commercial Boulevard, 3 rd Floor
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309-3421
Dear Mr. Yesbeck:
Attached please find the transmittal sent to the Department of Community Affairs on December
30, 1999, regarding the EAR-Based Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and non EAR-
Based Future Land Use Map amendment for the City of Boynton Beach.
Please feel free to contact me at (561) 742-6260 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~tAA F-
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
MWRfnl
Attachments
J:ISHRDA T AIPlanningISHAREDI\liP\PROJECTSIDCA Letter 12-30-99,doc
America's Gateway to the Gulfstream
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Division of Planning and Zoning
Building
Planning & Zoning
Engineering
Occupational License
Community Redevelopment
December 30, 1999
Mr. Anthony Waterhouse, P.E.
Director, Surface Water Management
South Florida Water Management District
P.O. Box 24680
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416
Dear Mr. Waterhouse:
Attached please find the transmittal sent to the Department of Community Affairs on December
30, 1999, regarding the EAR-Based Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and non EAR-
Based Future Land Use Map amendment for the City of Boynton Beach.
Please feel free to contact me at (561) 742-6260 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
d~~ ~vr
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
MWR/nl
Attachments
J :\SHRDA T A \PlanninglSHAREDI ~'P\PROlECTS\SF\\rMDTransmittal Letter. doc
America's Gateway to the Gulfstream
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FA-X: (561) 375-6259
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Division of Planning and Zoning
Building
Planning & Zoning
Engineering
Occupational License
Community Redevelopment
December 30, 1999
Ms. Lynn Griffin
Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Programs
Department of Environmental Protection
3900 Commonwealth Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32303
Mail Station 47
Dear Ms. Griffm:
Attached please find the transmittal sent to the Department of Community Affairs on December
30, 1999, regarding the EAR-Based Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and non EAR-
Based Future Land Use Map amendment for the City of Boynton Beach.
Please feel free to contact me at (561) 742-6260 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
d~iA~ rf'-
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
MWR/nl
Attachments
America's Gateway to the Gulfstream
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Division of Planning and Zoning
Building
Planning & Zoning
Engineering
Occupational License
Community Redevelopment
December 30, 1999
Michael J. Busha
Executive Director
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
301 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 300
Stuart, Florida 34994
Dear Mr. Busha:
Attached please find the transmittal sent to the Department of Community Affairs on December
30,1999, regarding the EAR-Based Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and non EAR-
Based Future Land Use Map amendment for the City of Boynton Beach.
Please feel free to contact me at (561) 742-6260 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ddl-" ;JAw #-
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
MWRJnl
Attachments
J:\SHRDATAIPlanning\SHARED\WPlPROJECTSIDCA letter 12-30-99,doc
America's Gateway to the Gulfstream
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259
EXHIBIT "C"
NOTICE OF ZONING CHANGE
NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PUBLIC HEARINGS
The City of Boynton Beach proposes to amend text within the Comprehensive Plan, change the land use
plan and rezone property indicated on the map below.
Public hearings to consider transmittal of these proposals will be held before the Planning and
Development Board on December 14, 1999, at 7:00 P.M" and before the Local Planning Agency/City
Commission on December 21, 1999, at 6:30 P.M. at City Hall in the Commission Chambers, 100 East
Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida.
~~/ III ~ I I rnl!nr 1 ~ f-I- I ~ l ~ ::; ,; r-~' .W -r-.,
.~ ,~W l--- :: ;,:, I, .
~,-..... I II. ; I I n.ll. ".~. ::: : :;-e- ---~
,- I 10,1, I ,t; 'u.. I ,l. .jl' - 0""'-- ;: ';'~I -(L....
.-t '" !I:l I .~~ _ to..' _'-'b
") , E' ~i i':;:: --
I ' ' " - , · " ~
'/1: :: I :: 111!lif: ill:! """ . ~f,! ',:,: _ . I_ 1\0.__-:__:
,~ I lUlU f;J~ ~_ I .fI':;:~~ ~f-~\-l___...._,
i_ [" ; , II ~cLJ ! j~I.~ Ii: Hi A~ ~ ~ \~~ '
-(11111 IIIIL ,:~ ~ UI':: ,. ---.4.
I I I LJ.J 'I' f}' I:: ::: vr~ -' ~.....;.
r , , I I I i ;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:~::::::::::::::::. '- !!! ! f : I ~ ~:
r T I I I I I 1, ~;:;:;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:~::.::.::.::.::::::::.' I : :: ., -
, Jli-ft+=*: : : : : ft-i-_. . 4 . If' I : I' .:.:..l.-
- T I II : i.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::~~:iV:::::::::::;$i -- IT E ',::,.,;i,::! ::,:: :j 'Ii t- r-
I- I- " t 11/ J , c?:':':':':':':':':'::::::.:::':':""'.A I 1---
I- .... r-1 I: :;..!.:::::::::::::::::::.:........, / I I
- .... D 1-1 -, of. .............. /1 I - J':: ," -l-
I] ,... I , '-I ~t-t:a:::1 " I I j. :',0..... ~ f-
~ I '''''''': J.. J=::o+If/..{ ,1 ' ' ,..: ~
~:: ~ I l~ ~ ~~ IlL I .// fffr-;.
;")l:I-T - ~~, "I ......." 'l ':;1:: II
I , I u-:" ':: II
J n. , ... , .
:.... '-~ --; 'L_+" '::... "_
'I , I , Ir ' " ~ -' " ',' : ' . . T
'I 11 I I I I I II .' : :! : ;',..;:.. '_', ~ ~.: -' :
I "", ,'.:', ,
, ..~..
it '~ 111 ,:.~,..,.,...~/.-I~! !!::1 J I
::/,1, -. 111111l1f-:: :,'-Li:=:".
~ / .,,"t--
cr: - -~-- ., I I . ;1 ,. - . .
0: ' :: ;_~.-:ti:.t~::
&,' I :: ::g-.";" ',:
. ::; 1:1 ",:r:_
: I r ; . I ::: ~ I I"... ,. I
, ~ - : ;, :;: . ::::; -
":;1 I .r-r !2:: - , ....,.., ~;i: ill -, J,
I / ,- ~ I 1~: II i! i, J
......-.....::.r-- ...,r I~:~ ~,~. ..,.
I-
~/
~---
~-.l ,.'
III ' ,
I -t----: ,:' ,
, """L ;::
T7 :'
,'f~~:,
J.I;J~IL ,::,'
-~~Il ::.
i '-__ l' I 0 .
PETITIONER:
AGENT:
INTENDED USE:
LOCATION:
Grove Partners, L TD.
Bradley D. Miller, AICP
Multi - family residential
Northwest comer of the intersection of Federal Highway (US 1) and Old Dixie
Highway
REQUEST:
Complete legal description on file in the Planning and Zoning Division, 100
East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida
AMEND FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
From - Local Retail Commercial
To - Special High Density Residential (20 dwelling units/acre)
REZONE
From - C-3 Community Commercial
To - R-3 High Density Residential
AMEND TEXT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Amend Section I.p., page 89 and 90 of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use
Support Document. The current text is provided below.
1. p Parcels at Northwest Comer of U.S. 1 and Old Dixie Highwav
Due to the limited demand for commercial floor space along this segment of U.S.
1, the Coastal Management Element originally recommended that these parcels
be taken out of the Local Retail Commercial land use category, and placed in the
Special High Density Residential category. However, because a site plan and
construction drawings for a shopping center on this site have been approved by
the City, the City Commission decided to keep these parcels in the Local Retail
Commercial land use category.
LEGAL:
REQUEST:
REQUEST:
The proposed text read as follows:
I.p Parcels at Northwest Comer of U.S. 1 and Old Dixie Highwav
Due to the limited demand for commercial floor space along this segment ofU.S.
1, an initial recommendation of the Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1989 was
that these parcels be taken out of the Local Retail Commercial land use category,
and placed in the Special High Density Residential category. This
recommendation was not enacted because a site plan and construction drawings
for a shopping center on this site had been approved by the City. The shopping
center has not been developed and the site plan and construction plan approvals
have expired. Therefore, these parcels should be taken out of the Local Retail
Commercial land use category and placed in the Special High Density
Residential category to encourage development and revitalization of this area of
the City.
A COPY OF THESE APPLICATIONS AND CORRESPONDING LEGAL DESCRIPTION ARE
A V AILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION, MONDA Y
THROUGH FRIDAY, 8:00 A.M. TO 5:30 P.M.
ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE NOTIFIED TO APPEAR AT SAID HEARINGS IN PERSON
OR BY ATTORNEY AND BE HEARD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY
DECISION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD OR CITY COMMISSION WITH
RESPECT TO ANY MA ITER CONSIDERED AT THESE MEETINGS WILL NEED TO ENSURE
THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD
INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS BASED.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
(561) 742-6260
\\CH\MAJN\SHRDA T A\PLANNlNG\SHARED\ WPlPROJECTS\ VILLA DEL SOL CPTA & LUAR\UP ADA TEDLEGAL.DOC