REVIEW COMMENTS
:\-'IINUTES-
PLANNING AND DEVELOP:\,lE:"lT BOARD
BOY~TO:"l BEACH. FLORIDA
OCTOBER 8. 1996
Motion
Mr. Aguila moved to approve the minutes of the September 10, 1996 meeting. Mr. Wische
seconded the motion, which carried 6-0.
5. COMMUNICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Report from the Planning and Zoning Department
1. Final Disposition of Last Meeting's Agenda Items
Ms. Heyden reported the following:
. Blockbuster Video Community Design Plan Appeal - Approved by the City
Commission, subject to all staff comments.
. S1. Joseph's Episcopal Church Conditional Use Approval - Approved by the City
Commission, subject to all staff comments.
. East Ridge PUD Rezoning - Postponed. The applicant is resubmitting plans. This
item will be heard at the next meeting.
. Woolbright Place Master Plan Modification - Ended with the Planning and
Development Board making the final determination.
. Riverwalk Shopping Center Community Design Plan Appeal - Approved by the City
CommissioJ'!, subject to all staff comments.
. Boynton Beach Community Development Corporation Parking Lot Variance - This
board recommended that all staff comments be deleted except comment 9, which
required the applicant to reduce the width of the driveway from 27 feet to 20 feet.
The City Commission concurred with that comment and also required the applicants
to move the driveway as far south as possible. The applicants have done that, and
they have been able to make the driveway work without the variance. They have
been able to set it back 30 feet, as required by the Code.
. Boynton Beach Community Development Corporation Major Site Plan Modification -
Approved by the City Commission, subject to all staff comments and
2
~. ._...'V~.... ""VOUlunUII NO H~"'_
J.IF-~- _ u4I_llbrt.ri.,ft ft.. .........___ _1 .L.
I~'
\
I
I
!
i
!
:I
I
,I
I
:1
--r-- - - - ,,-pr--- - - - -
I "i ...-
: llJf ,1-
I ~~DV4
, IV ~Iv'~
I IV'.s
/,<<"c,tef
~~
.~)-:>
qL. L
ORDINANCE NO. 096- 31
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA AMENDING
CHAPTER 9, OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGUlATIONS, SECTION 11. EXTERIOR BUILDING
DESIGN, PROVIDING FOR
AMENDMENT/CLARIFICATION OF "DRIVE-UP OR
WALK-UP" WINDOWS; PROVIDING FOR
CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION AND
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the City Commission of the City
,
'I
: of Boynton Beach that a dBrifiCBtion is required regarding "drive-up or walk-up
;\ windows" which are pennltted; and
WHEREAS, upon recommendation of staff, the City Commission of the City
, of Boynton Beach hes deemed It to be In the best Interests of the citizens and
I
,I residents of the City of Boynton Beach to cI8rIfy this Issue which is routineiy
I
encountered by both the Planning Department;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
,I THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA, THAT:
i Section 1. Chapter 9 of the Land Development Regulations, Section 11.
I
I is hereby amended by adding the wards and figures in underlined type, and by
I
,
I deleting the words and figures in struck-through type, u follows:
:1
I
See. 11 Exterior Building Design.
A Building design approval shall be based ...
:\
I
H. Drive-up 01' walk-up windows far commercial uses shall not
be located on . building facade thId ,__ a publlo or private
street, unless the followlna reauirements are met:
1. The buildina fBcBde shall have
windows that tw'.r.I mu na less than 25% of
the facade and that are located at the
oedestrian level. A maximum of 1 alA. of
this 25% mav be simulated windows.
2.. . The buildino fscade shall be
modulated and divided into smaller
Identifiable Diecss to articulate the Diane
of the facade.
--=--~------ - .-----..-- ----.--- ---'-"-~~=---~._--
11'~_____
'1
!'
I
,
I
:1
I
"
.,
I
'1
I
,I
I
I
i
I
,i
i
;1
I
II
:1
,i
:1
.j
.\
I
..
I
'I
:I
I'
.,
"
..
iI
,I
I
~i
~ I
,
:1
:\
I
1
'I
.\
I
i
,
I
.1
I
--.... -- --...- -
least one offset hBvina B Ditched roof.
.WHXmMrlO
...~.. ..,.
.~
t=r:m
PI1CHBD ROQII
AUCWED
~ A minimum ten (10) foot wide
buffer stria shall be installed between the
street riGht-of-wav and the drive-throuah
lane. alona the entire Ienath of the drive-
throuah lane facina the street. and shall
be Drovlded In lieu of anv landscaDina
reauired bv the Im1dsCBDB code for
vehicular use ..... adiacent to a Dubllc
riaht-of-wav. The width of the buffer StriD
shall excIuda utility aaaements.
~ The landscaDe buffer striD
referenced sbov8 shall contain a
minimum two (2) foot tall earth berm
alona the entire lenaIh of the drive-
throuah lane facina the street and shall
have a SIODe not to exceed a ratio of
threa-to-one 13:11.
~ The landscsDe buffer striD
referenced above shall be Dlanted with a
minimum of one (1 ) tree. a minimum of
twelve (12) feet tall. for each thirtY (30)
linear feet. or fiaction ~reof. of drive-
throuah lane808 facina the street. In
edditlon. there sh8II be danted within this
buffer stria 8 continuous solid visual
screen at least three (3) feet in heiaht
within one vear of installation. This
screen shall be CDmDrised of at least two
different soedes of shrubs Dlanted in
arouDinas or undulatina rows. The
shrubs shall be a minimum of three (3)
aallons in size with an 18-24 inch scread.
.,...---....
--=-.;.-a:- ______~~-"--_ ~_c
full to base at time of D'amlne Ground
cover shall be Dlanted withIn 25% of the
reauired area of the land.ceDe buffer
!1Jjg.,
I
I
I
!
,I
Z. The landscsD8 buffer strlD
referenced above shall UN alant
materials thet meet the aualltv
reaulrements of the CltYs land8C8D8
Si9SiI..
I . All building f8Clldel of a building...
Section 2.
Each .nd every other provision of Chapter 9 not herein
Ipeclflcally amended -"all remain In full force ~ effect .. previously enacted.
Section 3. AlIIaw8 8I'1d ordIn8nces sppIyIng to the City of Boynton Beach
in conflict with any provisions of this ordinance 81'8 hereby repealed.
II Section 4. Should any section or proviSion of this Ordinance or any
portion thereof be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the remainder of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Authority Is hereby given to codify this Ordinance.
Section 6 this Ordinance shall become effective immediately.
FIRST READING thls.dL day of Man.
SECOND, FINAL READING AND PASSAGE this _ day of May, 1996.
: ATTEST: .
fj".r. YJI.~
tYClerk-~~
UlR c:".,..
~. 511111
--_._._--~---- ----------~~
--L_- -~ ~
- - - ...,..~- ----
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
SEPTEMBER 17, 1996
awnings. However, we agreed that when the elevations come in on the site plan level, we
will discuss this again.
No one in the audience wished to speak on this item.
Motion
Commissioner Titcomb moved to approve the Community Design Plan Appeal for
Blockbuster. Commissioner Tillman seconded the motion, which carried 5-0.
B.
Project:
Agent:
Rlverwalk Shopping Center alkla Causeway Square - .
Lee Starky
Lee Starky Group
Florida Boynton Investment, Inc.
Robert Armstrong, President
1600 South Federal Highway
Community Design Plan Appeal - Request to appeal
aspects of the Community Design Plan applicable to a street
front facade containing a drive-up window, to allow a
reduction in the percent of window coverage and the
omission of a pitched roof.
Owner:
~J5
vGf..
vJ"
Location:
Description:
! I
:1\
The applicant was not present. Ms. Heyden stated that the Planning and Development
Board unanimously recommended approval of this request, subject to all staff comments,
and the applicant has agreed to all ttle comments.
No one in the audience wished to address this item.
Motion
Commissioner Bradley moved- to' approve the Community Design Plan Appeal for
Riverwalk Shopping Center, subject to all staff comments. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz
seconded the motion.
Mayor'Taylor asked if there will be other opportunities to discuss landscaping on the side '-
of the building. Ms. Heyden stated that this is the last time the City Commission will see
this project. The next step is permitting. Mayor Taylor pointed out that when we changed
this to allow drive through windows facing streets, we said we were going to be very strict
on its appearance. He asked if staff is satisfied that this project will look good.
23
,. rfoposec HesolutionNo. R96- RE: Authorize purchase of two (2) parcels of
real property to be purchased pursuant to the City's Infill Construction Program
,-- --- -----'"-- ---
-~-_. ..
. - --...--------- ...-.:.~__ -'^-'- ^""'..........,..,.. ...~:..... r'\_
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
SEPTEMBER 17,1996
Ms. Heyden said in terms of landscaping, yes. The plans that were submitted the last time
the Commission saw this did not address the Community Design Plan comments for
landscaping. The applicant understands that he has to comply with those comments. This
application is being driven by the applicant's position that adding these windows will bring
about a security problem. That was one of the reasons why Ms. Heyden added invitation
windows into the Code. She thinks their percentage was about 8 1/2 or 9 percent in
compliance with the windows. She recommended this subject to staff comments; however,
she felt they could have extended themselves a little further and provided more invitation
windows. This carries the front elevations around to the side so it will look more consistent
all the way around.
Commissioner Bradley asked if there is landscaping between the street and the drive
through. Ms. Heyden answered affirmatively. Commissioner Bradley asked her to
describe the berm. Ms. Heyden said it is a 3 to 1 slope, minimum 10 foot wide buffer with
landscaping, including understory. . ;;
Flowers Bakery Warehouse/Distribution Center.
Quantum Park PID
Sam EI-Kholi
Spring Engineering, Inc.
Quantum Associates, a Florida General Partnership
First Eagle Developments, Inc.
Quantum Corporate Park, Lots 47-A, 47-B and a portion
of Lot 46-A
New Site Plan - Request for site plan approval to construct
a 7,000 square foot, new warehouse and office facility, and
associated parking on a 1.3 acre parcel in Quantum
Corporate Park.
Richard Bekesh with Spring Engineering stated that Planning and Development Board
comment 31 needs to be modified or deleted because it was inadvertently included. It
states, "Provide foundation landscaping on the east, north, and west sides of the building."
They actually did not request that. They only requested it on the north side. Ms. Heyden --
said the Planning and Development Board wants landscaping on the north side of the
building and on a portion of the east side and on a portion of the west side. However,
between this comment and comment 32, if you delete the words, "east and west" from
comment 31 so that it states, "provide foundation landscaping on the north side of the
The motion carried 5-0.
D.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Description:
1
-------------'--- --
24
~
~G- 'Y Ak:c:.u-
"
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
OF THE
CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APPLICANT: RIVERWALK SHOPPING CENTER F.K.A. GAUSEWAY SHOPPING
.
CENTER
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Lee Starky. acent for Mike Carey (Contract Purchaser)
DATE OF HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: September 16.1996
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Reauestinc an appeal to aspects of the Community Desion
Plan reculations applicable to a street front facade containino a drive-uD window. to allow
a reduction in the percent of window coveraoe and the omission of a pitched roof.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 124.190+/- sauare foot multi-buildino shoppino center
located at the southeast corner of US #1 and Woolbrioht Road.
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of
Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having
considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant,
members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner
consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2.
The AppliCjlnt
....Jt. HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative
staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as
set forth on Exhibit "E" with the notation "Included".
4.
The Appl~nt's application for relief is hereby
L GRANTED subject to the conditions' referenced in paragraph 3
hereof.
DENIED
//\/\.: \~\T/-~\ii' /,."
I~~ '/ \ ... , . . ..' ~\\'\
....: :v' . ~ . ,'I. .. .... . ...... .
, .... ~ . /\
'. l~' ': '/.:...';. I. "l\'~f,)
./' r, ., I."'
".' I ., ,. .-
" , , !.."':- . .~: ---
. .... - /'~\'1 ..:. -
:~ .', - .''(j '-5
..... A.....
\:( '''-:.: r' ~r.'~"':- . <>.1
':' , . ':. '. . :\)~./
. "
r
. ~ .
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the
terms and conditions of this order.
7.
Other:
~
DATED: Seotember 17. 1996
Ji;;~JA~~j~'~
City lerk
Oev Ord-R'--Ik
1II1M18
__ ..." .. . _' . __. OJ! ..
R,"ER' JhLK' SHOP\- \\~G' CEN\ER
.U Ill". ",t ,~~~:,"nr ....L [Gl- _,,,,' - ..,." .,..,-'-'~ --.W I II I
,11' -. '" ., 1i1!li ,(T11l =. ,I,' . .~, T
:.~'k:-' :::'';, _ ., II' II'" ," \ ~' \ ',:.:.::J : :' ~ -\ r I I \ '
!~lIi- ' . I ,_ ll:a1J- ,~' ~t! ,I. ' r __ r' - -, .: : iT I' ,'I T
I'~ ~ :!m] BI'" I' '- ,'1,.,,,..,,,::1 I 1 1 T
'1\. " ~...~ - IT m", .. -- ·
.. ' .' I ~ I : II II III l..: . r ' . : 1 11 I \ ,.
~~'~j~~_ i ~".!l! ~\~~(m \;i ,\ --' : III '1 n
U. '- :t '", .... If . \ " \'
\\ \ ,\1.11 III .1 ,I' 'I .:: .-.:. r --OJ"" " '.;" J'
. , ,. ~ \l T ,\11 II .: _' - .,- .J · ~: I ' ,- -..:;;
~ll ii ~ :IDIl "I\i';':1 ~ i .r '"".': l . 17:': ~
,....\ ::t\i1' tliu n t ~ ,hI ~ - l'~::: ;;;;'"""..J~=,, 1'-- l--;"-~
: I . 1 I -ri" ;.w.1I U 11lI' ,.' ,--. - J_ . C: ~
.~ ~R 1,lln I ,ll ,I ~ ~ ,.' -r i J I -- ~ .:--' I T
[" r.1:I II ,_ .1 . liiic - 1'\ I:'
, -:- ~ 7 .' CT I _ ....~. I:l=- 1.1 \,
\~J\~~IW~" \'\" rn'r~! ~t: \l ~T'~ 1:< " ~\\ n~
. ~~~~1~nm\M rrt1 ~ ~ -'-' ,i'Ij 11 TT~' ( . .
~;\~\ I\\'~' \' '" 1" ;1"\. 111 · ,'- ' =----1 ~. · \
\~\,\;';m~~\..\\..\"~;\" ( " I:t : _ ~ =;=F51 ,,' IT ~ '1S:~~~ ~ ~\~.:.- .
,,,t..\...II. .. '\ 1\ U ,f, \ rll [J :.;: -':. -= f · 1 . ~ . ~ ~: ~ :::::-. ' .\
"\'ii\~. \11'r1 \' ~ \'\1~' ,~;~,I~;: ,".' ~ ~ -> ~ rff ~.;.; :JJ \ -f - ,
:\.\?\ \~ 't~ \ \\ u 'Ui~:1 )~ ~~~ J~ F\ .~~T; r.__~l ~-, "....~~7,r--'
..( \ ;1\: lllnrn ~ "I i 'W-'~~' I. lTllT (~ --=' /'
. ,~ : 'fn 1\\1 ft 'n T :" :' \ 1::=1 ./:::;;: T 11 . T71 l.f \ ' /i'. .~
, : \ \ ,~" q" \ i\1 -6..~ I T i I ..17/ '":":'= i
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ II \ T!1 ,i' 1 ,-m iii' ~. ..........:::1 C 'li ' :,Ia,1- \ l :~
-' J ....,...l\l.if\l.J.~lilil' ;: ~ ,..n ~,~ \\ -=t .rird ILrt \, - ,l-'/
.
..J. .' . ... 'K =t' I O'i' . 1
.\.!.II" '.'I ; I:"'i _r='...ol po. __ .. . . !. ...1 l..t! nl, - II
L~\' ~-:, ;.,." ; ',~ ~ 1- ' II f~ ',~ I',\' " .-q-j
. \~l-,f 1F~ 11 T "", " 't; cr' :f.- - _.....1 ..:~
dL-, ',r :1 ..',. =r . I~ :\h..ill'C -' ,., . -- , ./t
. ~ ~ ~ , .' _ ,,':~h' -rr ...
I ...._ . -;I;:-::J ; : ;"" po - ..;,.. " ,.", I ~ '
5:~ ~E' ~: ~ ~- . r -.tJ.~: I '" ,:: "1\lt\\;oI~,,~J ,
_~{ _; ~~ ; ~~_ \, '::'l~- Tf I, " I '.' 1'. ul !
I ~. :lH' ~ '. - II! ,~:. -' ~:.. L;e "1
\ . \.. . J t. _ _ 1I: _/ ,. .1~11
",' _' iUf.~.~
,:. '. ' ~ i '1 r.o. I :', a ...0: ,- I
Y\l\ rr:'\ffiE m :j~R' .~ '3 IF' eC 1 . i --...~ ' ;L;=-
\(1" 'j "J. ,'" _ __ ...... 1 L
. ..,,, ,. It.' "..,,, \ 1 . .... "'" I
\
\ \ . <_:'r';t r .' t \---
'0 .1\ o. 0 800. FEE T _ .~ I I /"} . / l-i I \ .!
P~,"'N,,,,t; _ pe,pr. &_~~ I ! ,I ' I -' I
_. . ' . F
----- - ---.-..-------------
" -
EXHIBIT "E"
ConQilions of Approval
Project name: Riverwalk Shopping Center a.k.a. Causeway Square
File number. CDPA 96-002
Reference: Community Design Plan aopeal. File #CDPA 96-002
DEPARTMENTS
PUBLIC WORKS
INCLUDE REJECT
UTILITIES
FIRE
POLICE
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PARKS AND RECREATION
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
1.
Considering the approved design of the center does
not Include a pitched roof, staff recommends that
the design of the southwest corner of the building, j
including the drive-up structure, display a canopy
that matches the design of the canopy approved
above the entrance to the Walgreens store, rather
than incorporating into the design the required
pitched roof.
To articulate compatibility of design along the street
frontage of the center, it is further recommended
that an arched canopy, matching the design of the
canopy approved for the front of the building .j
occupied by Winn Dixie, be added above the
proposed windows. The arched canopy should
connect the northwest corner of the building to the
recommended new canopy that starts at the north
side of the drive-up structure and terminates at the
southwest corner of the building.
It is recommended that the color of the frames
proposed for the spandrel glass, service window /
and other storefront frames match the storefront V .
frames of the other tenant spaces.
2.
3.
~/
/
/
/
Page 2
Rlverwalk Shopping Center
a.k.a. Cau..-y Square
CDPA 96-002
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
4. Submission of landscape plans designed in /
accordance with the landscape regulations
identified in the Community Development Plans in
Section 11.H.4,5,6,7.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
CONDITIONS
5. NONE
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
6. To be determined.
MEH/dim
C:RIVERWAL.WPO
.........,
.......
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS FROM COMMISSION MEETING
I. ~oJ(
2.
~
3.
:
4.
s.
6.
=
7.
8. -
9.
-~~--
--
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA
SEPTEMBER 10. 1996
C. Appeals
Community Design Plan Appeal
,.~)
.tl/\ f.,.. (,f- ~
Location:
Description:
Riverwalk Shopping Center a/kJa Causeway Square
Lee Starky
Lee Starky Group
Florida Boynton Investment, Inc.
Robert Armstrong, President
1600 South Federal Highway
Request to appeal aspects of the Community Design
Plan applicable to a street front facade containing a
drive-up window, to allow a reduction in th~ percent of
window coverage and the omission of a pitched roof.
1.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
At this time, Chairman Dube acknowledged the presence of Mayor Jerry Taylor and his
wife in the audience.
Mike Carey, President of Carey Company, agreed with all of staff's conditions on Exhibit
E.
Mr. Aguila asked Mr. Carey what he is going to do with the drive-thru canopy. As
Mr. Carey understands the recommendation, the drive-thru canopy is to reflect the canopy
in front of the Walgreen's. Therefore, it will have full height to the roof of the larger building
behind it, and we would pick up the column details that exist on the building and carry them
over to the drive-thru canopy. The arched canopy that runs from the northwest corner of
the building to the drive-thru will be the Teflon canvas canopy, and it would be cantilevered
off of the building in arches the same size and dimensions as the ones in front of the Winn-
Dixie. It would, however, not be as deep as those, which are 10 feet deep.
Vice Chairman Golden said he is going to vote against this request. He is strongly
opposed to any drive-thru windows facing major roads. He feels that they should be
located on the sides or rear.
Motion
Mr. Wische moved to approve the request to appeal aspects of the Community Design
Plan applicable to a street front facade containing a drive-up window, to allow a reduction
8
~---~
--a....6...&.:
- ....QI= .
_A..th^pi.,ft ..... .r",h"''''ft "I h 1"\ ,
.,,, P'll~."'", If'" ",
MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
SEPTEMBER 10, 1996
in the percent of window coverage and the omission of a pitched roof, for Riverwalk
Shopping Center, subject to staff comments. Mr. Aguila seconded the motion, which
carried 5-1. Vice Chairman Golden cast the dissenting vote.
At this time, Mr. Aguila suggested dealing with Item 7.F.1 before Item 7.D.1, since the
parking lot variance may have some impact on the site plan modification.
Motion
Mr. Aguila moved to amend the agenda and deal with Item 7.F.1 next. Vice Chairman
Golden seconded the motion, which carried 6-0.
F. Other
Parking Lot Variance
1.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Boynton Beach Community Development
Corporation Office
L. Diana Hileman, Esquire
Law Office of Allen Wm. Martincavage, Sr.
Boynton Beach Community Development Corporation
2191 N. Seacrest Boulevard (southwest corner of
Gateway Boulevard and Seacrest Boulevard)
Request tor a variance from the Land Development
Regulations, Chapter 23 - Parking Lots, Article II,
Paragraph H - Driveways, Subsection 3 to allow a
reduction in distance' between the driveway and the
intersection of the right-ot-way lines from the required
thirty (30) teet to approximately five (5) feet.
Mr. Lewicki used the overhead projector to point out the location. He displayed the site
plan and described the variance. He explained that this parcel was reduced when the
ramp to 1-95 was built.
Ms. Heyden explained that because we have reduced our parking lot variance application
process to get applicants through as quickly as possible, the applicant has less time to
receive comments and respond to them. Also, variances were previously required to be
submitted with the site plan. This is no longer a requirement. However, if the site plan
9
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
D July 20, 1999
~ August 3, 1999
D August 17, 1999
D September 7, 1999
July 7, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
D September 21, 1999
D October 5, 1999
D October 19, 1999
D November 2,1999
September S, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
July 21, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
September 22, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
August 4, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
October 6,1999 (5:00 p.m.)
August IS, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
October 20,1999 (5:00 p.m.)
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
D Administrative
~ Consent Agenda
D Public Hearing
D Bids
D Announcement
D Development Plans
D New Business
D Legal
D Unfmished Business
D Presentation
RECOMMENDATION: Please place the request below on the August 3,1999 City Commission agenda under Consent-
Ratification of Planning and Development Action. The Planning and Development Board with an unanimous vote,
recommended approval subject to staff comments. For further details pertaining to this request see attached Department of
Development Memorandum No. PZ 99-126. .J?- o--n c9- -. ~~ -f7-Cn~ ( Cc--n-. "'" ct:...~ -6 Ie::. 2. '" L .-: (l A
,~~~ 6 b/<-o!:- .$-th'pe ft:, ~,KZJ/d? ,--/ of ciZ L'. r ,).A' U
EXPLANATION: pC"(~~-{...(" ....."'.,Q PC.....-IC. 0-" /l 77- }""tZ-- ./ c;.'n~ --;r"e---I
P.ROJECT: Wal*Mart Supercenter rr.;e.- 5Ja=.'1f:.. .;:;- ...I.1r~~ ~ b.-~ r~ (-...c;,~, ~ _s"'RP4~..c ,,-,-,;,
Jt'.....i- ~'~-t '~~... - - ~
..
jl)'-
... -' ~.
fll
~,.
r:p (J..I' / (C--~ e-v
7 /( -----:-- -'- 6~ rc V>'<CN<:ztX 1'dyJ"'- C 0/2- -7;'r~ r,/ Ce-----f~
-. tTYc-, C~V\t: yS ft . r: , ~
6< J '--51- C-- ~r' !;v-1-- 0 f J",; c.a y C~~~_C ~ I' It fr 01 ~ V\. D,~;e: c- ?
o . ! roc.rhc-!
s '- G ~7'" ++~.J p I'h>--.s. iEI-- Y .s ~ K{ ~A Z)/~/e f~-Jl~ ~r,d/'
~ ~ 5 t~+ (10u.. ( 1/ I C ~'^--3 E,.c- --(<:.r ~ v -t:r<.:- Ccrr.
~' t1....~ c_ f f;~ -.::-~ c
'(Y>':"'IP\{ 1fYt~~c{l~~ (~l""'~~ of- Ic..L~c'I~.r G:- .f'/"€c.-c'.s<= ~~J2~/~
vv,'r:t<;.. .J:cJcof/Jq, tcf ~ prt>~sd e-7.r q:1I.c.1) .rL /ct-/;O-.u
Co! ~ 6--I(~j; ? ~ G--;rJ-c-fJ-
.,
;1;j C d- n,.cif . I'
~ . 't' . (' 'JJ krt (~ fYc~+ 0/
'V;J! y2~~~ ~Z
e r1..~' '^-c.. ~
CJ~ (r L- c:...,s --' G ~ Q".:,f-{---..f ?
~ r ~ G:-.rp (-vJ~ r?
&+ *^J
~r
- ....
{J {( ( .& [GVl CJ' Pi ~t ~4.s O(t,J)~v(G( <5-ff (t:J4) 6bCJv~ +'--
e" -fn-. C\.c:.e. ~ ~ ~ { y{CL:-(/\'$ S k~ b ~ fI1 r- ( ~ ~ l"v.. @~.? /b- Cj....
c~/' L:~. ...F fA , (
-r .J~/1 ~ 1 ffL r rrLv 'L~-':$- C' G'(Y'\. lJ'^.uy..o.: +r \)~ s ;:') LA \? {"'M- ~.......
\r~ ...t reJ ..,p - , j r-l"./
L G- C c- V'YY bL. ~ (1J-c.c:::O 6--+ --rka- S;:c,u--r-J.....tJed
C =-r 0,C- ~ c{ ~~; ~ 1'1, ~ +- tvt ~--k t..... 5 ~ cY= 5. !J" <- f ~
. .. (f JA Sk<
[' Q "'-=,r ~.,-'o,)~..,.l &.L.~ 7 I....G r.Ii!.."" 1n.........~ ..
tJ f' ( ( c ~ '<'~ '(. c.s
"
~.;
PLANNING AND ZONING Dl
MEMORANDUM NO.
'MENT
I
THRU:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
}tu- u. 7L- k
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
FROM:
Michael E. Haag
Current Planning Coordinator
DATE:
September 5, 1996
SUBJECT:
Riverwalk Shopping Center a.k.a. Causeway Square - Community Design
Plan appeal
File No. CDPA 96-002
~~
vf1"~ NATURE OF REQUEST
J ~ Lee Starky of the Lee Starky Group, agent for Mike Carey, contract purchaser of Riverwalk
Shopping Center (a.k.a. Causeway Square), is requesting an appeal to the Community
Design Plan regulations regarding architectural definition and percent of window openings
required on the facade of a building containing a drive-up window that faces a right-of-way.
The Riverwalk Shopping Center is a 124,190 +/- square foot multi-building shopping center
that is located at the southeast corner of US #1 and Woolbright Road (See Exhibit "A" -
location map and Exhibit "B" - letter of request).
BACKGROUND
On July 16, 1996 the City Commission granted conditional use approval for a drive-up
window at the Walgreens unit within this shopping center. The Walgreens tenant space
is located at the west end of the center, and has an entrance on its north facade. The
drive-up window was approved for the west end of the building. The conditional use
approval included major improvements to the parking area, site landscaping, and
renovations to the building facade (see Exhibit "C" - existing and approved building
elevations). The conditional use approval was granted subject to the applicant redesigning
the west facade of the building to meet the community design regulations regarding drive-
up windows.
ANAL YSIS
The improvements to the center, including the addition of the drive-up window, activated
the Community Design Plan regulations for which the applicant is seeking relief. Section
11. H. 1. through 7. of Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan of the city's land development
regulations states:
"H. Drive-up or walk-up windows for commercial uses shall not be located on a
building facade that faces a public or private street, unless the following
requirements are met:
1. The building facade shall have windows that occupy no less than 25%
of the facade and that are located at the pedestrian level. A
maximum of 10% of this 25% may be simulated windows.
I
~ .
-
Page 2
Memorandum No. 96-451
Riverwalk Shopping Center
a.k.a. Causeway Square
CDPA 96-002
2. The building facade shall be modulated and divided into smaller
identifiable pieces to articulate the plane of the facade.
4. A minimum ten (10) foot wide buffer strip shall be installed between
the street right-of-way and the drive-through lane, along the entire
length of the drive-through lane facing the street, and shall be
provided in lieu of any landscaping required by the landscape code for
vehicular use areas adjacent to a public right-of-way. The width of the
buffer strip shall exclude utility easements.
5. The landscape buffer strip referenced above shall contain a minimum
two (2) foot tall earth berm along the entire length of the drive-through
lane facing the street and shall have a slope not to exceed a ratio of
three-to-one (3:1).
6. The landscape buffer strip referenced above shall be planted with a
minimum of one (1) tree, a minimum of twelve (12) feet tall, for each
thirty (30) linear feet, or fraction thereof, of drive-through laneage
facing the street. In addition, there shall be planted within this buffer
strip a continuous solid visual screen at least three (3) feet in height
within one year of installation. This screen shall be comprised of at
least two different species of shrubs planted in groupings or.
undulating rows. The shrubs shall be a minimum of three (3) gallons
in size with an 18-24 inch spread, full to base, at time of planting.
Ground cover shall be planted within 25% of the required area of the
landscape buffer strip.
7. The landscape buffer strip referenced above shall use plant materials
that meet the quality requirements of the City's landscape code."
The applicant proposed a window feature along the west elevation of the building, which
represents approximately 8.7 percent of this facade. As previously stated, in this situation,
the code regulations require a minimum of 25 percent of the facade to be occupied by
window elements. The community design plan also requires that the building facade be
divided into identifiable pieces to articulate the facade rather than a flat wall. The proposed
plan depicts an undefined arched wall feature above two sections of windows along the
west wall. The drive-up window structure is the same design and configuration as shown
on the approved drawings, but does not include a pitched roof as required by the design
code. The applicant did not submit landscape plans depicting the landscaping required,
as indicated above, in association with a drive-up window, therefore, it is assumed that site
landscaping will be tailored to comply with those regulations, and reflected in the revised
plan and submitted for permits.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of this request; however, in order to maintain compatibility of
the proposed building facade with the other building facades of the center, staff
recommends the following conditions which are also listed in Exhibit "E" - Conditions of
Approval:
1. Considering the approved design of the center does not include a pitched
roof, staff recommends that the design of the southwest corner of the
building, including the drive-up structure, display a canopy that matches the
design of the canopy approved above the entrance to the Walgreens store,
2-
rather than incorporating into the design the required pitched roof.
Page 3
Memorandum No. 96-451
Riverwalk Shopping Center
a.k.a. Causeway Square
CDPA 96-002
2. To articulate compatibility of design along the street frontage of the center,
it is further recommended that an arched canopy, matching the design of the
canopy approved for the front of the bUildin---occupied by Winn Dixie, be
a e a ove t e proposed windows. The arched canopy should connect the
northwest corner of the building to the recommend new canopy that starts at
the north side of the drive-up structure and terminates at the southwest
corner of the building.
3. It is recommended that the color of the frames proposed for the spandrel
glass, service window and other storefront frames match the storefront
frames of the other tenant spaces.
4. Submission of landscape plans designed in accordance with the landscape
regulations identified in the Community Design Plan in Section 11. H. 4, 5,
6,7.
T JH:meh:arw
xc: Central File
A:\WALGREEN
.3
,
-....... ...... ~~J-'.--"...~'""""r ~.
," _;..- _.ot~" .> ~~ ~~-'" ""-or_. 0; 'to- ;. ~r.
~,~...,. ...... "'n-~~.~ ~"'_"'~'_""-"""""""'''''''''<.'''''~'~'''''.''_''~ ....._
.~
--
17-.
Conditions of Approva'
Project name: Riverwalk Shopping Center a.k.a. Causeway Square
File number: CDPA 96-002
Reference: Community Design Plan appeal. File #CDPA 96-002
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
.
UTILITIES
Co
FIRE
Co
POLICE
~nl =
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Co .. --.-
. 1\.11 11\.11-
PARKS AND RECREATION
CO .~
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
~n . .-..-
. N(,ll\ll-
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
1. Considering the approved design of the center does
not include a pitched roof, staff recommends that
the design of the southwest corner of the building,
including the drive-up structure, display a canopy
that matches the design of the canopy approved
above the entrance to the Walgreens store, rather
than incorporating into the design the required
pitched roof.
2. To articulate compatibility of design along the street
frontage of the center, it is further recommended
that an arched canopy, matching the design of the
canopy approved for the front of the building
occupied by Winn Dixie, be added above the
proposed windows. The arched canopy should
connect the northwest corner of the building to the
recommended new canopy that starts at the north
side of the drive-up structure and terminates at the
southwest corner of the building.
3. It is recommended that the color of the frames
proposed for the spandrel glass, service window
and other storefront frames match the storefront
frames of the other tenant spaces.
/~
/
...c.,.... "'?"".-page+-- . -. ~ . ..'" ..- "'~~'.~. .~- ~- ... . ~ ~.
Riverwalk Shopping Center
a.k.a. Causeway Square
CDPA 96-002
1l'F _,_. ._~.. ._. ._ ~_. . _ ~.__ _ .. ij~
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
4. Submission of landscape plans desigJ
accordance with the landscape regul d;;'
identified in the Community Devpl- .,.!lent Plans in
Section 11.H.4,5,6,7.
-
ADDITIONAL PLANNING ANi. :_OPMENT BOARD
CONDITIONS
5. NONE
ADDITIONAL CITY COr"i~Mlvv,vl" vONDITIONS
6. To be determined.
MEH/dim
C:RIVERWAL.WPD
/1
RIVERW ALK PLAZA JOINT VENTURE
1690 S. CONGRESS AVE. SUITE 200
DELRA Y BEACH, FL 33445
June 7, 1999
City ofBoyntQn Beach
Planning & Zoning
~. ~chaelFturnpf
100 East Boynton
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
.RE: Riverwalk Plaza / Woolbright & US 1
Dear Mr. Ftumpf,
The Riverwalk Plaza Joint Venture requests an administration site plan review for a
minor modification.
We are enclosing a copy of the elevations of the shopping center depicting awnings. We
hereby request to withdraw the approved awnings from our plans.
Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $100.00 payable to The City of Boynton for the
minor modification fee.
Please notify Ftobert Levy with any questions at 274-2000 Ext. 345 or Marty Sadkin at
(954) 370-9771.
(.) /,;. --c
{". '-, ':>
?
c (~c.--dc
fi1./l - -'
V v; I n <C:S'"\,
IV( c;c-Q
/;!c.
I
,1\ (2-
.-,,/
" I "
(11' U <
..... ......