Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS :\-'IINUTES- PLANNING AND DEVELOP:\,lE:"lT BOARD BOY~TO:"l BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 8. 1996 Motion Mr. Aguila moved to approve the minutes of the September 10, 1996 meeting. Mr. Wische seconded the motion, which carried 6-0. 5. COMMUNICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Report from the Planning and Zoning Department 1. Final Disposition of Last Meeting's Agenda Items Ms. Heyden reported the following: . Blockbuster Video Community Design Plan Appeal - Approved by the City Commission, subject to all staff comments. . S1. Joseph's Episcopal Church Conditional Use Approval - Approved by the City Commission, subject to all staff comments. . East Ridge PUD Rezoning - Postponed. The applicant is resubmitting plans. This item will be heard at the next meeting. . Woolbright Place Master Plan Modification - Ended with the Planning and Development Board making the final determination. . Riverwalk Shopping Center Community Design Plan Appeal - Approved by the City CommissioJ'!, subject to all staff comments. . Boynton Beach Community Development Corporation Parking Lot Variance - This board recommended that all staff comments be deleted except comment 9, which required the applicant to reduce the width of the driveway from 27 feet to 20 feet. The City Commission concurred with that comment and also required the applicants to move the driveway as far south as possible. The applicants have done that, and they have been able to make the driveway work without the variance. They have been able to set it back 30 feet, as required by the Code. . Boynton Beach Community Development Corporation Major Site Plan Modification - Approved by the City Commission, subject to all staff comments and 2 ~. ._...'V~.... ""VOUlunUII NO H~"'_ J.IF-~- _ u4I_llbrt.ri.,ft ft.. .........___ _1 .L. I~' \ I I ! i ! :I I ,I I :1 --r-- - - - ,,-pr--- - - - - I "i ...- : llJf ,1- I ~~DV4 , IV ~Iv'~ I IV'.s /,<<"c,tef ~~ .~)-:> qL. L ORDINANCE NO. 096- 31 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER 9, OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGUlATIONS, SECTION 11. EXTERIOR BUILDING DESIGN, PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT/CLARIFICATION OF "DRIVE-UP OR WALK-UP" WINDOWS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the City Commission of the City , 'I : of Boynton Beach that a dBrifiCBtion is required regarding "drive-up or walk-up ;\ windows" which are pennltted; and WHEREAS, upon recommendation of staff, the City Commission of the City , of Boynton Beach hes deemed It to be In the best Interests of the citizens and I ,I residents of the City of Boynton Beach to cI8rIfy this Issue which is routineiy I encountered by both the Planning Department; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF ,I THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA, THAT: i Section 1. Chapter 9 of the Land Development Regulations, Section 11. I I is hereby amended by adding the wards and figures in underlined type, and by I , I deleting the words and figures in struck-through type, u follows: :1 I See. 11 Exterior Building Design. A Building design approval shall be based ... :\ I H. Drive-up 01' walk-up windows far commercial uses shall not be located on . building facade thId ,__ a publlo or private street, unless the followlna reauirements are met: 1. The buildina fBcBde shall have windows that tw'.r.I mu na less than 25% of the facade and that are located at the oedestrian level. A maximum of 1 alA. of this 25% mav be simulated windows. 2.. . The buildino fscade shall be modulated and divided into smaller Identifiable Diecss to articulate the Diane of the facade. --=--~------ - .-----..-- ----.--- ---'-"-~~=---~._-- 11'~_____ '1 !' I , I :1 I " ., I '1 I ,I I I i I ,i i ;1 I II :1 ,i :1 .j .\ I .. I 'I :I I' ., " .. iI ,I I ~i ~ I , :1 :\ I 1 'I .\ I i , I .1 I --.... -- --...- - least one offset hBvina B Ditched roof. .WHXmMrlO ...~.. ..,. .~ t=r:m PI1CHBD ROQII AUCWED ~ A minimum ten (10) foot wide buffer stria shall be installed between the street riGht-of-wav and the drive-throuah lane. alona the entire Ienath of the drive- throuah lane facina the street. and shall be Drovlded In lieu of anv landscaDina reauired bv the Im1dsCBDB code for vehicular use ..... adiacent to a Dubllc riaht-of-wav. The width of the buffer StriD shall excIuda utility aaaements. ~ The landscaDe buffer striD referenced sbov8 shall contain a minimum two (2) foot tall earth berm alona the entire lenaIh of the drive- throuah lane facina the street and shall have a SIODe not to exceed a ratio of threa-to-one 13:11. ~ The landscsDe buffer striD referenced above shall be Dlanted with a minimum of one (1 ) tree. a minimum of twelve (12) feet tall. for each thirtY (30) linear feet. or fiaction ~reof. of drive- throuah lane808 facina the street. In edditlon. there sh8II be danted within this buffer stria 8 continuous solid visual screen at least three (3) feet in heiaht within one vear of installation. This screen shall be CDmDrised of at least two different soedes of shrubs Dlanted in arouDinas or undulatina rows. The shrubs shall be a minimum of three (3) aallons in size with an 18-24 inch scread. .,...---.... --=-.;.-a:- ______~~-"--_ ~_c full to base at time of D'amlne Ground cover shall be Dlanted withIn 25% of the reauired area of the land.ceDe buffer !1Jjg., I I I ! ,I Z. The landscsD8 buffer strlD referenced above shall UN alant materials thet meet the aualltv reaulrements of the CltYs land8C8D8 Si9SiI.. I . All building f8Clldel of a building... Section 2. Each .nd every other provision of Chapter 9 not herein Ipeclflcally amended -"all remain In full force ~ effect .. previously enacted. Section 3. AlIIaw8 8I'1d ordIn8nces sppIyIng to the City of Boynton Beach in conflict with any provisions of this ordinance 81'8 hereby repealed. II Section 4. Should any section or proviSion of this Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this Ordinance. Section 5. Authority Is hereby given to codify this Ordinance. Section 6 this Ordinance shall become effective immediately. FIRST READING thls.dL day of Man. SECOND, FINAL READING AND PASSAGE this _ day of May, 1996. : ATTEST: . fj".r. YJI.~ tYClerk-~~ UlR c:".,.. ~. 511111 --_._._--~---- ----------~~ --L_- -~ ~ - - - ...,..~- ---- MINUTES CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 17, 1996 awnings. However, we agreed that when the elevations come in on the site plan level, we will discuss this again. No one in the audience wished to speak on this item. Motion Commissioner Titcomb moved to approve the Community Design Plan Appeal for Blockbuster. Commissioner Tillman seconded the motion, which carried 5-0. B. Project: Agent: Rlverwalk Shopping Center alkla Causeway Square - . Lee Starky Lee Starky Group Florida Boynton Investment, Inc. Robert Armstrong, President 1600 South Federal Highway Community Design Plan Appeal - Request to appeal aspects of the Community Design Plan applicable to a street front facade containing a drive-up window, to allow a reduction in the percent of window coverage and the omission of a pitched roof. Owner: ~J5 vGf.. vJ" Location: Description: ! I :1\ The applicant was not present. Ms. Heyden stated that the Planning and Development Board unanimously recommended approval of this request, subject to all staff comments, and the applicant has agreed to all ttle comments. No one in the audience wished to address this item. Motion Commissioner Bradley moved- to' approve the Community Design Plan Appeal for Riverwalk Shopping Center, subject to all staff comments. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz seconded the motion. Mayor'Taylor asked if there will be other opportunities to discuss landscaping on the side '- of the building. Ms. Heyden stated that this is the last time the City Commission will see this project. The next step is permitting. Mayor Taylor pointed out that when we changed this to allow drive through windows facing streets, we said we were going to be very strict on its appearance. He asked if staff is satisfied that this project will look good. 23 ,. rfoposec HesolutionNo. R96- RE: Authorize purchase of two (2) parcels of real property to be purchased pursuant to the City's Infill Construction Program ,-- --- -----'"-- --- -~-_. .. . - --...--------- ...-.:.~__ -'^-'- ^""'..........,..,.. ...~:..... r'\_ MINUTES CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 17,1996 Ms. Heyden said in terms of landscaping, yes. The plans that were submitted the last time the Commission saw this did not address the Community Design Plan comments for landscaping. The applicant understands that he has to comply with those comments. This application is being driven by the applicant's position that adding these windows will bring about a security problem. That was one of the reasons why Ms. Heyden added invitation windows into the Code. She thinks their percentage was about 8 1/2 or 9 percent in compliance with the windows. She recommended this subject to staff comments; however, she felt they could have extended themselves a little further and provided more invitation windows. This carries the front elevations around to the side so it will look more consistent all the way around. Commissioner Bradley asked if there is landscaping between the street and the drive through. Ms. Heyden answered affirmatively. Commissioner Bradley asked her to describe the berm. Ms. Heyden said it is a 3 to 1 slope, minimum 10 foot wide buffer with landscaping, including understory. . ;; Flowers Bakery Warehouse/Distribution Center. Quantum Park PID Sam EI-Kholi Spring Engineering, Inc. Quantum Associates, a Florida General Partnership First Eagle Developments, Inc. Quantum Corporate Park, Lots 47-A, 47-B and a portion of Lot 46-A New Site Plan - Request for site plan approval to construct a 7,000 square foot, new warehouse and office facility, and associated parking on a 1.3 acre parcel in Quantum Corporate Park. Richard Bekesh with Spring Engineering stated that Planning and Development Board comment 31 needs to be modified or deleted because it was inadvertently included. It states, "Provide foundation landscaping on the east, north, and west sides of the building." They actually did not request that. They only requested it on the north side. Ms. Heyden -- said the Planning and Development Board wants landscaping on the north side of the building and on a portion of the east side and on a portion of the west side. However, between this comment and comment 32, if you delete the words, "east and west" from comment 31 so that it states, "provide foundation landscaping on the north side of the The motion carried 5-0. D. Project: Agent: Owner: Applicant: Location: Description: 1 -------------'--- -- 24 ~ ~G- 'Y Ak:c:.u- " DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APPLICANT: RIVERWALK SHOPPING CENTER F.K.A. GAUSEWAY SHOPPING . CENTER APPLICANT'S AGENT: Lee Starky. acent for Mike Carey (Contract Purchaser) DATE OF HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: September 16.1996 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Reauestinc an appeal to aspects of the Community Desion Plan reculations applicable to a street front facade containino a drive-uD window. to allow a reduction in the percent of window coveraoe and the omission of a pitched roof. LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 124.190+/- sauare foot multi-buildino shoppino center located at the southeast corner of US #1 and Woolbrioht Road. DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO. THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2. The AppliCjlnt ....Jt. HAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "E" with the notation "Included". 4. The Appl~nt's application for relief is hereby L GRANTED subject to the conditions' referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. DENIED //\/\.: \~\T/-~\ii' /,." I~~ '/ \ ... , . . ..' ~\\'\ ....: :v' . ~ . ,'I. .. .... . ...... . , .... ~ . /\ '. l~' ': '/.:...';. I. "l\'~f,) ./' r, ., I."' ".' I ., ,. .- " , , !.."':- . .~: --- . .... - /'~\'1 ..:. - :~ .', - .''(j '-5 ..... A..... \:( '''-:.: r' ~r.'~"':- . <>.1 ':' , . ':. '. . :\)~./ . " r . ~ . 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other: ~ DATED: Seotember 17. 1996 Ji;;~JA~~j~'~ City lerk Oev Ord-R'--Ik 1II1M18 __ ..." .. . _' . __. OJ! .. R,"ER' JhLK' SHOP\- \\~G' CEN\ER .U Ill". ",t ,~~~:,"nr ....L [Gl- _,,,,' - ..,." .,..,-'-'~ --.W I II I ,11' -. '" ., 1i1!li ,(T11l =. ,I,' . .~, T :.~'k:-' :::'';, _ ., II' II'" ," \ ~' \ ',:.:.::J : :' ~ -\ r I I \ ' !~lIi- ' . I ,_ ll:a1J- ,~' ~t! ,I. ' r __ r' - -, .: : iT I' ,'I T I'~ ~ :!m] BI'" I' '- ,'1,.,,,..,,,::1 I 1 1 T '1\. " ~...~ - IT m", .. -- · .. ' .' I ~ I : II II III l..: . r ' . : 1 11 I \ ,. ~~'~j~~_ i ~".!l! ~\~~(m \;i ,\ --' : III '1 n U. '- :t '", .... If . \ " \' \\ \ ,\1.11 III .1 ,I' 'I .:: .-.:. r --OJ"" " '.;" J' . , ,. ~ \l T ,\11 II .: _' - .,- .J · ~: I ' ,- -..:;; ~ll ii ~ :IDIl "I\i';':1 ~ i .r '"".': l . 17:': ~ ,....\ ::t\i1' tliu n t ~ ,hI ~ - l'~::: ;;;;'"""..J~=,, 1'-- l--;"-~ : I . 1 I -ri" ;.w.1I U 11lI' ,.' ,--. - J_ . C: ~ .~ ~R 1,lln I ,ll ,I ~ ~ ,.' -r i J I -- ~ .:--' I T [" r.1:I II ,_ .1 . liiic - 1'\ I:' , -:- ~ 7 .' CT I _ ....~. I:l=- 1.1 \, \~J\~~IW~" \'\" rn'r~! ~t: \l ~T'~ 1:< " ~\\ n~ . ~~~~1~nm\M rrt1 ~ ~ -'-' ,i'Ij 11 TT~' ( . . ~;\~\ I\\'~' \' '" 1" ;1"\. 111 · ,'- ' =----1 ~. · \ \~\,\;';m~~\..\\..\"~;\" ( " I:t : _ ~ =;=F51 ,,' IT ~ '1S:~~~ ~ ~\~.:.- . ,,,t..\...II. .. '\ 1\ U ,f, \ rll [J :.;: -':. -= f · 1 . ~ . ~ ~: ~ :::::-. ' .\ "\'ii\~. \11'r1 \' ~ \'\1~' ,~;~,I~;: ,".' ~ ~ -> ~ rff ~.;.; :JJ \ -f - , :\.\?\ \~ 't~ \ \\ u 'Ui~:1 )~ ~~~ J~ F\ .~~T; r.__~l ~-, "....~~7,r--' ..( \ ;1\: lllnrn ~ "I i 'W-'~~' I. lTllT (~ --=' /' . ,~ : 'fn 1\\1 ft 'n T :" :' \ 1::=1 ./:::;;: T 11 . T71 l.f \ ' /i'. .~ , : \ \ ,~" q" \ i\1 -6..~ I T i I ..17/ '":":'= i \ \ \ \ \ \ \ II \ T!1 ,i' 1 ,-m iii' ~. ..........:::1 C 'li ' :,Ia,1- \ l :~ -' J ....,...l\l.if\l.J.~lilil' ;: ~ ,..n ~,~ \\ -=t .rird ILrt \, - ,l-'/ . ..J. .' . ... 'K =t' I O'i' . 1 .\.!.II" '.'I ; I:"'i _r='...ol po. __ .. . . !. ...1 l..t! nl, - II L~\' ~-:, ;.,." ; ',~ ~ 1- ' II f~ ',~ I',\' " .-q-j . \~l-,f 1F~ 11 T "", " 't; cr' :f.- - _.....1 ..:~ dL-, ',r :1 ..',. =r . I~ :\h..ill'C -' ,., . -- , ./t . ~ ~ ~ , .' _ ,,':~h' -rr ... I ...._ . -;I;:-::J ; : ;"" po - ..;,.. " ,.", I ~ ' 5:~ ~E' ~: ~ ~- . r -.tJ.~: I '" ,:: "1\lt\\;oI~,,~J , _~{ _; ~~ ; ~~_ \, '::'l~- Tf I, " I '.' 1'. ul ! I ~. :lH' ~ '. - II! ,~:. -' ~:.. L;e "1 \ . \.. . J t. _ _ 1I: _/ ,. .1~11 ",' _' iUf.~.~ ,:. '. ' ~ i '1 r.o. I :', a ...0: ,- I Y\l\ rr:'\ffiE m :j~R' .~ '3 IF' eC 1 . i --...~ ' ;L;=- \(1" 'j "J. ,'" _ __ ...... 1 L . ..,,, ,. It.' "..,,, \ 1 . .... "'" I \ \ \ . <_:'r';t r .' t \--- '0 .1\ o. 0 800. FEE T _ .~ I I /"} . / l-i I \ .! P~,"'N,,,,t; _ pe,pr. &_~~ I ! ,I ' I -' I _. . ' . F ----- - ---.-..------------- " - EXHIBIT "E" ConQilions of Approval Project name: Riverwalk Shopping Center a.k.a. Causeway Square File number. CDPA 96-002 Reference: Community Design Plan aopeal. File #CDPA 96-002 DEPARTMENTS PUBLIC WORKS INCLUDE REJECT UTILITIES FIRE POLICE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 1. Considering the approved design of the center does not Include a pitched roof, staff recommends that the design of the southwest corner of the building, j including the drive-up structure, display a canopy that matches the design of the canopy approved above the entrance to the Walgreens store, rather than incorporating into the design the required pitched roof. To articulate compatibility of design along the street frontage of the center, it is further recommended that an arched canopy, matching the design of the canopy approved for the front of the building .j occupied by Winn Dixie, be added above the proposed windows. The arched canopy should connect the northwest corner of the building to the recommended new canopy that starts at the north side of the drive-up structure and terminates at the southwest corner of the building. It is recommended that the color of the frames proposed for the spandrel glass, service window / and other storefront frames match the storefront V . frames of the other tenant spaces. 2. 3. ~/ / / / Page 2 Rlverwalk Shopping Center a.k.a. Cau..-y Square CDPA 96-002 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 4. Submission of landscape plans designed in / accordance with the landscape regulations identified in the Community Development Plans in Section 11.H.4,5,6,7. ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 5. NONE ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 6. To be determined. MEH/dim C:RIVERWAL.WPO ........., ....... ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS FROM COMMISSION MEETING I. ~oJ( 2. ~ 3. : 4. s. 6. = 7. 8. - 9. -~~-- -- MINUTES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 10. 1996 C. Appeals Community Design Plan Appeal ,.~) .tl/\ f.,.. (,f- ~ Location: Description: Riverwalk Shopping Center a/kJa Causeway Square Lee Starky Lee Starky Group Florida Boynton Investment, Inc. Robert Armstrong, President 1600 South Federal Highway Request to appeal aspects of the Community Design Plan applicable to a street front facade containing a drive-up window, to allow a reduction in th~ percent of window coverage and the omission of a pitched roof. 1. Project: Agent: Owner: At this time, Chairman Dube acknowledged the presence of Mayor Jerry Taylor and his wife in the audience. Mike Carey, President of Carey Company, agreed with all of staff's conditions on Exhibit E. Mr. Aguila asked Mr. Carey what he is going to do with the drive-thru canopy. As Mr. Carey understands the recommendation, the drive-thru canopy is to reflect the canopy in front of the Walgreen's. Therefore, it will have full height to the roof of the larger building behind it, and we would pick up the column details that exist on the building and carry them over to the drive-thru canopy. The arched canopy that runs from the northwest corner of the building to the drive-thru will be the Teflon canvas canopy, and it would be cantilevered off of the building in arches the same size and dimensions as the ones in front of the Winn- Dixie. It would, however, not be as deep as those, which are 10 feet deep. Vice Chairman Golden said he is going to vote against this request. He is strongly opposed to any drive-thru windows facing major roads. He feels that they should be located on the sides or rear. Motion Mr. Wische moved to approve the request to appeal aspects of the Community Design Plan applicable to a street front facade containing a drive-up window, to allow a reduction 8 ~---~ --a....6...&.: - ....QI= . _A..th^pi.,ft ..... .r",h"''''ft "I h 1"\ , .,,, P'll~."'", If'" ", MINUTES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 10, 1996 in the percent of window coverage and the omission of a pitched roof, for Riverwalk Shopping Center, subject to staff comments. Mr. Aguila seconded the motion, which carried 5-1. Vice Chairman Golden cast the dissenting vote. At this time, Mr. Aguila suggested dealing with Item 7.F.1 before Item 7.D.1, since the parking lot variance may have some impact on the site plan modification. Motion Mr. Aguila moved to amend the agenda and deal with Item 7.F.1 next. Vice Chairman Golden seconded the motion, which carried 6-0. F. Other Parking Lot Variance 1. Project: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Boynton Beach Community Development Corporation Office L. Diana Hileman, Esquire Law Office of Allen Wm. Martincavage, Sr. Boynton Beach Community Development Corporation 2191 N. Seacrest Boulevard (southwest corner of Gateway Boulevard and Seacrest Boulevard) Request tor a variance from the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 23 - Parking Lots, Article II, Paragraph H - Driveways, Subsection 3 to allow a reduction in distance' between the driveway and the intersection of the right-ot-way lines from the required thirty (30) teet to approximately five (5) feet. Mr. Lewicki used the overhead projector to point out the location. He displayed the site plan and described the variance. He explained that this parcel was reduced when the ramp to 1-95 was built. Ms. Heyden explained that because we have reduced our parking lot variance application process to get applicants through as quickly as possible, the applicant has less time to receive comments and respond to them. Also, variances were previously required to be submitted with the site plan. This is no longer a requirement. However, if the site plan 9 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office Requested City Commission Meeting Dates Date Final Form Must be Turned in to City Clerk's Office D July 20, 1999 ~ August 3, 1999 D August 17, 1999 D September 7, 1999 July 7, 1999 (5:00 p.m.) D September 21, 1999 D October 5, 1999 D October 19, 1999 D November 2,1999 September S, 1999 (5:00 p.m.) July 21, 1999 (5:00 p.m.) September 22, 1999 (5:00 p.m.) August 4, 1999 (5:00 p.m.) October 6,1999 (5:00 p.m.) August IS, 1999 (5:00 p.m.) October 20,1999 (5:00 p.m.) NATURE OF AGENDA ITEM D Administrative ~ Consent Agenda D Public Hearing D Bids D Announcement D Development Plans D New Business D Legal D Unfmished Business D Presentation RECOMMENDATION: Please place the request below on the August 3,1999 City Commission agenda under Consent- Ratification of Planning and Development Action. The Planning and Development Board with an unanimous vote, recommended approval subject to staff comments. For further details pertaining to this request see attached Department of Development Memorandum No. PZ 99-126. .J?- o--n c9- -. ~~ -f7-Cn~ ( Cc--n-. "'" ct:...~ -6 Ie::. 2. '" L .-: (l A ,~~~ 6 b/<-o!:- .$-th'pe ft:, ~,KZJ/d? ,--/ of ciZ L'. r ,).A' U EXPLANATION: pC"(~~-{...(" ....."'.,Q PC.....-IC. 0-" /l 77- }""tZ-- ./ c;.'n~ --;r"e---I P.ROJECT: Wal*Mart Supercenter rr.;e.- 5Ja=.'1f:.. .;:;- ...I.1r~~ ~ b.-~ r~ (-...c;,~, ~ _s"'RP4~..c ,,-,-,;, Jt'.....i- ~'~-t '~~... - - ~ .. jl)'- ... -' ~. fll ~,. r:p (J..I' / (C--~ e-v 7 /( -----:-- -'- 6~ rc V>'<CN<:ztX 1'dyJ"'- C 0/2- -7;'r~ r,/ Ce-----f~ -. tTYc-, C~V\t: yS ft . r: , ~ 6< J '--51- C-- ~r' !;v-1-- 0 f J",; c.a y C~~~_C ~ I' It fr 01 ~ V\. D,~;e: c- ? o . ! roc.rhc-! s '- G ~7'" ++~.J p I'h>--.s. iEI-- Y .s ~ K{ ~A Z)/~/e f~-Jl~ ~r,d/' ~ ~ 5 t~+ (10u.. ( 1/ I C ~'^--3 E,.c- --(<:.r ~ v -t:r<.:- Ccrr. ~' t1....~ c_ f f;~ -.::-~ c '(Y>':"'IP\{ 1fYt~~c{l~~ (~l""'~~ of- Ic..L~c'I~.r G:- .f'/"€c.-c'.s<= ~~J2~/~ vv,'r:t<;.. .J:cJcof/Jq, tcf ~ prt>~sd e-7.r q:1I.c.1) .rL /ct-/;O-.u Co! ~ 6--I(~j; ? ~ G--;rJ-c-fJ- ., ;1;j C d- n,.cif . I' ~ . 't' . (' 'JJ krt (~ fYc~+ 0/ 'V;J! y2~~~ ~Z e r1..~' '^-c.. ~ CJ~ (r L- c:...,s --' G ~ Q".:,f-{---..f ? ~ r ~ G:-.rp (-vJ~ r? &+ *^J ~r - .... {J {( ( .& [GVl CJ' Pi ~t ~4.s O(t,J)~v(G( <5-ff (t:J4) 6bCJv~ +'-- e" -fn-. C\.c:.e. ~ ~ ~ { y{CL:-(/\'$ S k~ b ~ fI1 r- ( ~ ~ l"v.. @~.? /b- Cj.... c~/' L:~. ...F fA , ( -r .J~/1 ~ 1 ffL r rrLv 'L~-':$- C' G'(Y'\. lJ'^.uy..o.: +r \)~ s ;:') LA \? {"'M- ~....... \r~ ...t reJ ..,p - , j r-l"./ L G- C c- V'YY bL. ~ (1J-c.c:::O 6--+ --rka- S;:c,u--r-J.....tJed C =-r 0,C- ~ c{ ~~; ~ 1'1, ~ +- tvt ~--k t..... 5 ~ cY= 5. !J" <- f ~ . .. (f JA Sk< [' Q "'-=,r ~.,-'o,)~..,.l &.L.~ 7 I....G r.Ii!.."" 1n.........~ .. tJ f' ( ( c ~ '<'~ '(. c.s " ~.; PLANNING AND ZONING Dl MEMORANDUM NO. 'MENT I THRU: Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board }tu- u. 7L- k Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Planning and Zoning Director TO: FROM: Michael E. Haag Current Planning Coordinator DATE: September 5, 1996 SUBJECT: Riverwalk Shopping Center a.k.a. Causeway Square - Community Design Plan appeal File No. CDPA 96-002 ~~ vf1"~ NATURE OF REQUEST J ~ Lee Starky of the Lee Starky Group, agent for Mike Carey, contract purchaser of Riverwalk Shopping Center (a.k.a. Causeway Square), is requesting an appeal to the Community Design Plan regulations regarding architectural definition and percent of window openings required on the facade of a building containing a drive-up window that faces a right-of-way. The Riverwalk Shopping Center is a 124,190 +/- square foot multi-building shopping center that is located at the southeast corner of US #1 and Woolbright Road (See Exhibit "A" - location map and Exhibit "B" - letter of request). BACKGROUND On July 16, 1996 the City Commission granted conditional use approval for a drive-up window at the Walgreens unit within this shopping center. The Walgreens tenant space is located at the west end of the center, and has an entrance on its north facade. The drive-up window was approved for the west end of the building. The conditional use approval included major improvements to the parking area, site landscaping, and renovations to the building facade (see Exhibit "C" - existing and approved building elevations). The conditional use approval was granted subject to the applicant redesigning the west facade of the building to meet the community design regulations regarding drive- up windows. ANAL YSIS The improvements to the center, including the addition of the drive-up window, activated the Community Design Plan regulations for which the applicant is seeking relief. Section 11. H. 1. through 7. of Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan of the city's land development regulations states: "H. Drive-up or walk-up windows for commercial uses shall not be located on a building facade that faces a public or private street, unless the following requirements are met: 1. The building facade shall have windows that occupy no less than 25% of the facade and that are located at the pedestrian level. A maximum of 10% of this 25% may be simulated windows. I ~ . - Page 2 Memorandum No. 96-451 Riverwalk Shopping Center a.k.a. Causeway Square CDPA 96-002 2. The building facade shall be modulated and divided into smaller identifiable pieces to articulate the plane of the facade. 4. A minimum ten (10) foot wide buffer strip shall be installed between the street right-of-way and the drive-through lane, along the entire length of the drive-through lane facing the street, and shall be provided in lieu of any landscaping required by the landscape code for vehicular use areas adjacent to a public right-of-way. The width of the buffer strip shall exclude utility easements. 5. The landscape buffer strip referenced above shall contain a minimum two (2) foot tall earth berm along the entire length of the drive-through lane facing the street and shall have a slope not to exceed a ratio of three-to-one (3:1). 6. The landscape buffer strip referenced above shall be planted with a minimum of one (1) tree, a minimum of twelve (12) feet tall, for each thirty (30) linear feet, or fraction thereof, of drive-through laneage facing the street. In addition, there shall be planted within this buffer strip a continuous solid visual screen at least three (3) feet in height within one year of installation. This screen shall be comprised of at least two different species of shrubs planted in groupings or. undulating rows. The shrubs shall be a minimum of three (3) gallons in size with an 18-24 inch spread, full to base, at time of planting. Ground cover shall be planted within 25% of the required area of the landscape buffer strip. 7. The landscape buffer strip referenced above shall use plant materials that meet the quality requirements of the City's landscape code." The applicant proposed a window feature along the west elevation of the building, which represents approximately 8.7 percent of this facade. As previously stated, in this situation, the code regulations require a minimum of 25 percent of the facade to be occupied by window elements. The community design plan also requires that the building facade be divided into identifiable pieces to articulate the facade rather than a flat wall. The proposed plan depicts an undefined arched wall feature above two sections of windows along the west wall. The drive-up window structure is the same design and configuration as shown on the approved drawings, but does not include a pitched roof as required by the design code. The applicant did not submit landscape plans depicting the landscaping required, as indicated above, in association with a drive-up window, therefore, it is assumed that site landscaping will be tailored to comply with those regulations, and reflected in the revised plan and submitted for permits. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this request; however, in order to maintain compatibility of the proposed building facade with the other building facades of the center, staff recommends the following conditions which are also listed in Exhibit "E" - Conditions of Approval: 1. Considering the approved design of the center does not include a pitched roof, staff recommends that the design of the southwest corner of the building, including the drive-up structure, display a canopy that matches the design of the canopy approved above the entrance to the Walgreens store, 2- rather than incorporating into the design the required pitched roof. Page 3 Memorandum No. 96-451 Riverwalk Shopping Center a.k.a. Causeway Square CDPA 96-002 2. To articulate compatibility of design along the street frontage of the center, it is further recommended that an arched canopy, matching the design of the canopy approved for the front of the bUildin---occupied by Winn Dixie, be a e a ove t e proposed windows. The arched canopy should connect the northwest corner of the building to the recommend new canopy that starts at the north side of the drive-up structure and terminates at the southwest corner of the building. 3. It is recommended that the color of the frames proposed for the spandrel glass, service window and other storefront frames match the storefront frames of the other tenant spaces. 4. Submission of landscape plans designed in accordance with the landscape regulations identified in the Community Design Plan in Section 11. H. 4, 5, 6,7. T JH:meh:arw xc: Central File A:\WALGREEN .3 , -....... ...... ~~J-'.--"...~'""""r ~. ," _;..- _.ot~" .> ~~ ~~-'" ""-or_. 0; 'to- ;. ~r. ~,~...,. ...... "'n-~~.~ ~"'_"'~'_""-"""""""'''''''''<.'''''~'~'''''.''_''~ ....._ .~ -- 17-. Conditions of Approva' Project name: Riverwalk Shopping Center a.k.a. Causeway Square File number: CDPA 96-002 Reference: Community Design Plan appeal. File #CDPA 96-002 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS . UTILITIES Co FIRE Co POLICE ~nl = DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Co .. --.- . 1\.11 11\.11- PARKS AND RECREATION CO .~ FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST ~n . .-..- . N(,ll\ll- PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 1. Considering the approved design of the center does not include a pitched roof, staff recommends that the design of the southwest corner of the building, including the drive-up structure, display a canopy that matches the design of the canopy approved above the entrance to the Walgreens store, rather than incorporating into the design the required pitched roof. 2. To articulate compatibility of design along the street frontage of the center, it is further recommended that an arched canopy, matching the design of the canopy approved for the front of the building occupied by Winn Dixie, be added above the proposed windows. The arched canopy should connect the northwest corner of the building to the recommended new canopy that starts at the north side of the drive-up structure and terminates at the southwest corner of the building. 3. It is recommended that the color of the frames proposed for the spandrel glass, service window and other storefront frames match the storefront frames of the other tenant spaces. /~ / ...c.,.... "'?"".-page+-- . -. ~ . ..'" ..- "'~~'.~. .~- ~- ... . ~ ~. Riverwalk Shopping Center a.k.a. Causeway Square CDPA 96-002 1l'F _,_. ._~.. ._. ._ ~_. . _ ~.__ _ .. ij~ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 4. Submission of landscape plans desigJ accordance with the landscape regul d;;' identified in the Community Devpl- .,.!lent Plans in Section 11.H.4,5,6,7. - ADDITIONAL PLANNING ANi. :_OPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 5. NONE ADDITIONAL CITY COr"i~Mlvv,vl" vONDITIONS 6. To be determined. MEH/dim C:RIVERWAL.WPD /1 RIVERW ALK PLAZA JOINT VENTURE 1690 S. CONGRESS AVE. SUITE 200 DELRA Y BEACH, FL 33445 June 7, 1999 City ofBoyntQn Beach Planning & Zoning ~. ~chaelFturnpf 100 East Boynton Boynton Beach, FL 33425 .RE: Riverwalk Plaza / Woolbright & US 1 Dear Mr. Ftumpf, The Riverwalk Plaza Joint Venture requests an administration site plan review for a minor modification. We are enclosing a copy of the elevations of the shopping center depicting awnings. We hereby request to withdraw the approved awnings from our plans. Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $100.00 payable to The City of Boynton for the minor modification fee. Please notify Ftobert Levy with any questions at 274-2000 Ext. 345 or Marty Sadkin at (954) 370-9771. (.) /,;. --c {". '-, ':> ? c (~c.--dc fi1./l - -' V v; I n <C:S'"\, IV( c;c-Q /;!c. I ,1\ (2- .-,,/ " I " (11' U < ..... ......