APPLICATION
k1nv 1 ^ "', 0 ,~
llv . . ~,). L ll; G
9: 5dA",1
K"~A\! & 1_~~,rv~r.~.',JI:FS
, : ~" ,,' . . I. _ "I __
NO. 107
p, 2
Kildav & A$sociates
Landscape Architects/Planners
1351 Forum PI~ee. S\lite 100A
West Palm 8aect\ Florida 33401
(Se1) 6SS-5522 - Fax (561) 689-2592
www.kildayine.eom
November 10, 2000
Lucia Galav, AlCP
Senior Planner
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd., Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE: Code Review Request; Off-street parking requirements in PUD's
Ourfilel45 1.<4
Dear Mrs. Galav:
As you are aware, our office recently submitted a parking variance application on behalf
of Wood Partners for their proposed A./ta Chase development in the Woolbright Place
PUD. Due to the fact that there have been several recent parking variances zequested
and approved ...,ithin PUD's in the City, and based upon my conversations 'with the City
staff regarding the parking requirements, the most prudent course of action is to revise
our variance application into a request for a Code Review of the parldng requirements
in a pun. Please consider the following information in your ar.alysis oftbis issue.
The City's requirements for offJstreet parking within residential Planned Unit
Development Districts are fmmd in Section 2.5, Section 9.C. It states that: "Off-srreer
parking requirements shall in no event be less than f"NO (2) spaces per dwelling unit. ..
This requirement does not permit the flexibility that is necessary in determining the
parking required on a particular property. A more effective requirement would be to
permit the each development the opportunity to either:
a. Amend the pazkina requirement to permit parking at a rate of no less than
1.6 spaces per unit. 1bis would allow properties to provide PaIking at a rate
is consistent with the development proposed; or
b. A deviation from this requirement of up to 20%. Staff would review the
applicanfs justification for the deviation on a case by case basis. Staff
should consider the housL.'1g type proposed, the site layout, and the any
additional justifications or studies provided by the de..,-eloper.
The City's Land Development Regulatior..5 identitY the intent and purpose of the PlJD
District: "to promote efficient and economical land use, improved amenities,
appropriate and harmoni.ous variety in physical developmeY'.t, creative desilm improved
livin~ environment, ol'del'(v and economical development in the city, and the protection
ell adjacent a'tuf existinfl and {uturtJ cf~ development" (ul"lderline added) (Ch 2.5 Sec. 1).
NOV, ~O. 2~!OG 9:55AM
K7' "IY' & ~(~orrATEC
.,~'J" n......... v 1 Ii V
NO. ~ 07
p ~
Applyin~ a 'blanket' parking ratio of two spaces per unit to all dwelling units in the
PUD regardless of the unit type or their size fails to meet intent of the Code. The
current language has a de-a-:..mental effect on the 'adjacent and existing City
development' because it often reslllts in excessive asphalt paving, which minimizes
opportunities for iI'eenspace on sites that are required to provide parking beyond what
is necessary. A degree of flexibility in the PUD regulations helps to allow for greater
'creative design' in site planning that is specifically encouraged in the PUD Districts.
The current Code limits this flexibility by applying a single parking ratio to all dwelling
units, re&ardless of size or type. There is, in fact, greater flexibility in the standard
multi-family district's parking requirements than in the PUD.
The Cit).,s off-street parking requirements for residential PUD's must be v..ritten to
balance the need for adequate parking for the residents in the development, ",ithout
encumbering the site with excessive, unused parking spaces. Over-parking creates an
unnecessary 'sea of asphalt' that is unsightly and results in a decrease in greenspace
which increases the impervious surface areas and strains the City's stonnwater
management system.
The primary factor in determining the number of parking spaces that should be provided
for a multi-family property is the number of units and the type of unit proposed. T.cle
current off-street parking requirements for a PUD do not take these factors into account.
The Code requires the same number of parking spaces for t.i:ree bedroom apartments as
it does for efficiencies. This places an undue burden upon developments with an
apartment mix that does have not as many multiple bedroom units. For example, Alta
Chase inclcdes 72 one-bedroom units. l08 two-bedroom units, and 36 three-bedroom
units. Obviously, the parking needs for the 72 one-bedroom units are less than those of
the three bedroom units, yet the PU'D regulations do not recognize this difference.
An additional factor that must be considered when detennining the amount of parking
spaces required for an apartment community is the layo'Ut of the buildings and the
parking lot. On many properties. the parking is so dispersed throughout the site that
many of the spaces are not utilized. For example, t.~e Alta Chase site plan has been
efficiently designed. The parking and the buildings are closely grouped together. The
effect of this layout is that there most of the parking spaces on the property can be used
by renters in several different buildings. The majority of the spaces are located at an
equal distance between several buildings. Considering that none of the spaces on the
property will be 'reserved', the residents will share the spaces as they are necessary.
This helps to ensure that the spaces are fully utilized. The two spaces per unit
requirement is UlUlecessary and 'noill have a detrimental effect on the City as a whole.
The developer of the Alta Chase property, Wood Partners, has built over 50,000 units
throughout the southeast. Please see the letter attached with this application from the
developer that further discusses their parking needs, additional information can be
provided upon request.
~ov, ~ ~'. 2000
9. r.H!\~
. ) u,,1'
K' nAv & A~\~~'AT~S
' J.e-J ,. )'JV\'! ,'~'
NO.1 07
P Ii
Please review the above information in combination with the other parking variance
applications that have been requested from the City and consider this request for a Code
Review by staff. Call me with an}' questions or if you need additional information.
Cc:
Jason McArthur, Wcod Pa.."1ners
.18/31/2a00 10:09
5614341663
PINDER TROUTMAl'l
PAGE 01
PI"DE~ TROOTMflN CO"SOLTI"G. I"c.
Transportation Planners and Engineers
2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H
West Palm Beach. FL 33406
(561) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663
Email: pindertroutman@msn.com
GROTIO BAY
Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. (PTQ has researched various zoning and land development codes
to identify the appropriate parldng requirement standards for Grotto Bay.
In land development regulations and codes, it is usually very difficult to find an exact matching of
circumstances. Therefore, a sampling of available land development codes has been selected.
locally, the Town of Juno Beach has a sliding scale for parking in multj.family developments
depending on the total number of units. For the first 20 dwelling units 2 parking spaces are required,
units 21 to 50, require 1.75 spaces per unit and all units above 50 provide 1.5 spaces per unit.
Visitor parking is calculated at one space per 7 units. Using this formula, the total number of parking
spaces and average spaces per unit for Grotto Bay are calculated below.
Units
1 to 20
21 to 50
50 to 272
272 + 7
Grotto Bay Paving Requirements
luno Beach Parking Code
Parking Spaces / Unit
2.0
1.75
1.5
Total Spaces
40
53
333
-12
465 +272 =
Average Spaces Per Unit
1.71
Grotto Bay requires 1.71 spaces per unit. This is slightly less than the 1.75 spaces per unit currently
proposed .
The City of Austin, Texas has adopted a zoning ordinance for a Traditional Neighborhood District
(TN D), which also indudes parking requirements. Residential multi-famify parking spaces are
provided on a sliding scale based on number of bedrooms. The parking requirements for Grotto Bay,
calculated using these standards, are provided below.
Units
One Bedroom 80
Two Bedroom 148
Three Bedroom 44
Grotto Bay Paving Requirements
Austin, Texas Zoning Ordinance
Parking Spaces I Unit
1.0
1.5
2.0
Total Spaces
80
222
88
390+ 272 =
Average Spaces Per Unit
1.43
The proposed parking for Grotto Bay at 1.75 spaces per unit is above the 1.43 spaces per unit
calculated using the Austin, Texas TND standards.
PTC0Q-(]6 10-:11-00
Pi
!-.
Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 13 OF THE CITY CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 13-
9 RELATING TO A TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING DISTRICT; AMENDING
SECTION 13-2-21 TO ADD A TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING DISTRICT AS A
SPECIAL PURPOSE BASE DISTRICT; AMENDING CHAPTER 13-2 TO ADD A NEW SECTION
13-2-95 RELATING TO A TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING DISTRICT; AMENDING
SECTION 13-2-731 RELATING TO APPLICABILITY OF COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS; AND
AMENDING CHAPTER 13-2, ARTICLE VII TO REGULATE A TRADITIONAL
NEIGHBORHOOD SIGN DISTRICT.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN:
Title 13 of the City Code is amended to add a new Chapter 13-9 to read as follows:
CHAPTER 13-9 TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT
http://wWw.reVlew.C1.austm.tx.us/tnd/lNU_UKlJ.htmJ
I.)f J ~/uu
,..."
. .
Page 1 of 1
13-9-53 PARKING.
A. The following parking regulations apply in a Traditional Neighborhood District:
1. A parking lot or garage may not be adjacent to a square or adjacent to or opposite a
street intersection.
2. A parking lot shall be located at the rear or side of a building. If located at the side,
screening shall be provided at the lot line by landscaping or decorative walls or fences.
3. Compact parking spaces are prohibited.
4. There is no off-street loading requirement for a building with less than 10,000 square
feet of gross building area. The Director shall determine the location, number, and
dimensions of the off-street loading for a larger building.
5. Except as approved by the Director, parking in alleys is prohibited.
6. Minimum parking requirements are as follows:
a. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a commercial use must
provide one parking space for every 500 square feet of gross building area.
b. A commercial use parking lot or garage must provide not less than one
bicycle parking space for every 10 motor vehicle parking spaces.
c. A condominium, multi-family, group residential, or retirement housing use
must provide one parking space for the first bedroom of a dwelling unit and
0.5 parking space for each additional bedroom.
d. A townhouse, single-family residential, duplex, group home, or family home
use must provide two parking spaces for each dwelling unit.
e. A convalescent services or congregate living use must provide one parking
space for every four beds.
f A daycare services, primary educational facilities, or secondary educational
facilities use must provide one parking space for each employee.
g. The Director shall determine the parking requirement for any use not listed
in this subsection.
A. The following parking regulations apply in a Neighborhood Center Area:
1. The required parking for a use may be located anywhere in the Neighborhood Center
Area. Community parking facilities are encouraged.
2. Not more than 125% of~e required parking for a use may be provided on-site.
3. A commercial or a multi-family use may apply adjacent on-street parking toward the
minimum parking requirements.
A. In a Mixed Residential Area or Neighborhood Edge Area, the required parking for a use must
be provided on-site.
B. The Director shall determine the parking requirements for a Workshop Area or Employment
Center Area.
http://www.revlew.Cl.austm.tx.us/tndlTNlJ_UKlJ.html
lJ/ ns/uu
TO\VN OF JUNO BEACH, FLORIDA
COMI)RElIENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
~
1.00
snORT TITLE AND PURPOSE
1.00-1
2.00
DEFINITIONS
2.00-1
3.00
ESTABLISHIHENT OF DISTRICTS:
PROVISION FOR OFFICIAL ZONING IHAP
3.00-1
4.00 DEFINITIONS AND ESTADLISllIHENT OF
ZONING DISTRICTS 4.00-1
4.10 Residential Single-Family(RS- I ,2,3,4,5) 4.10-1
4.20 Residential Multiple Family - Medium Density(RM-I) 4.20-1
4.30 Residential Multiple Family - Moderate Density (RM-2) 4.30-1
4.40 Residential, Transient and Multiple
Family - Moderate Density (RMT) 4.40-1
4.50 High Density Residential (RH) 4. 50-1
4.60 Conunercial General(CG) 4.60-1
4.70 Commercial Office(CO) 4.70-1
4.80 Beach (BCH) 4.80-1
4.90 Recreation (REC) 4.90-1
4.100 Private Recreation (REC-PRIV) 4.100-1
4.110 Utilities (OIL) 4. 110-1
4.120 Government (GOV) 4.120-1
4.130 Institutional (INS) 4.130-1
4.140 Residential Multiple Family - Moderate
Density Open Space Option (I~M-OO) 4.140-1
4.200 Saturn Lane Historic Preservation District (HIST -S) 4.200-1
4.300 Zephyr Way Historic Preservation District (I-IIST-Z) 4.300-1
4.400 Beachbound Historic Preservation District (I-llST -B) 4.400-1
4.500 Residential Duplex (Two Family)(R-DUP) 4.500-1
4.600 Recreational Vehicle Park (RV PARK) 4.600-1
4.700 Manufactured Home Community (MH) 4.700-1
5.00 SUPPLEIHENTARY REGULATIONS
5.10 Lot Regulations 5. 1 0-1
. . 5.30 Supplementary Use Regulations 5.30-1
5.40 Parking Requirements 5.40-1
-----------.- ~-------_.
....,..
non-residential development, providing for vehicular (automobile and
bicycle) and pedestrian traffic. Existing non-residential
developments adjacent to new non-residential developments shall be
encouraged to provide internal cross access. Such cross access shall
be provided in a recordable instrument in a form acceptable to the
Town Attorney. A non-residential development adjacent to a
residential development may be required to provide a vehicular
and/or pedestrian access way if the residential development desires
such cOlmection.
(c) An efficient and safe pedestrian and vehicular (automobile and
bicycle) trafiic system shall be provided throughout the parking and
other vehicular use areas.
(d) The design, number and placement of such drives, access ways, and
alleyways shall be subject to review by the Planning & Zoning Board
and approval by the Town Council, and ifapplicable, county and state
authorities having jurisdiction over such matter.
(5) Schedule of Off-Street Parking Requirements.
The schedule of ofT-street parking requirements is as follows below. The
Town encourages Ule use of angled parking for ease of access to its residents.
SCHEDULE OF OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS
JUNO BEACI-I. FLORIDA
USE
SPACE REQUIRED PER UNIT
(UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN A
PARTICULAR ZONING DISTRICT)
Accessory Apartment
One (1) space per dwelling unit if 750 square feet
(SF) or less. Two (2) spaces per dwelling unit if
greater than 750 SF.
Single and two-family
dwellings and townhouses
Two (2) spaces per dwelling unit. In addition,
developments with 3 or more attached units, one (1)
guest space shall be required for every 7 units.
Multiple-family dwelling
Two (2) spaces per dwelling unit for the initial 20
units; 1.75 spaces for each from 21 through 50; 1.50
spaces for units 51 and more. In addition, one (1)
guest space shall be required for every 7 units.
..
5.40-3
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Division of Planning and Zoning
Building
Planning & Zoning
OccupailonalLicense
Community Redevelopment
November 20, 2000
Chris Kerr
Kilday & Associates
1551 Forum Place, Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Re: Code Review Request: Off-street parking requirements in PUD's
Alta Chase (Wood Partners) CDRV 00-014
Dear Mr. Kerr:
Enclosed is a City of Boynton check for overage payment for the application fee changed to a
code review ($250) from a zoning code variance ($400) for the above-reference.
If you have any questions in this matter, please contact Doris Marttila (742-6268) or Dick
Hudson (742-6264)
Sincerely,
A.{)?,
Michael W. Rumpf
Planning and Zoning Director
MWRdim
Ene.
J:ISHRDATAIPLANNINGISHAREOIWPIPROJECTSIWOOD PARTNERS (ALTA CHASE)ICODE REVIEW)IRETURN OF OVERAGE FEE. DOC
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6260 Fax (561) 742-6259
Williamson, Blythe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Galav Lusia
Wednesday, November 08, 2000 2:41 PM
Williamson, Blythe
Alta Chase - Parking Variance
Blythe,
Last week, Chris Kerr submitted a parking variance for Alta Chase. At the TRC meeting, we decided to change the
variance to a code review. Please rename the file and renumber it in HTE. We also need to process a $150.00 refund for
the application fee. Please call Chris and request that he provide a letter agreeing to the application transfer from variance
to code review. Return the file to me for processing.
Thanks,
Lusia
1
~.-. '1-' ~
~ ,..~. _~ _.~. .~;~~!;,t~.. I
.~ .-.,....... ......... '-'; ."
. ..It ~"~~..:'\.-t
,
PROJECT NAME: Alta Chase (Wood Partners)
LOCATION: The west side of SW 8th Street, approximately 1/8 of a mile north of
Woolbright Road.
COMPUTER ID: 820000-15
PERMIT #:
I FILE NO.: CDRV 00-014 II TYPE OF APPLICATION: Code Review I
AGENT/CONTACT PERSON: Kilday & OWNER! APPLICANT: Wood Partners
Associates PHONE: 561-893-0094
PHONE: 561-689-5522 FAX: N/A
FAX: 561-689-2592 ADDRESS: 21135 White Oak Ave., Boca
ADDRESS: 1551 Forum Place, Suite 100A Raton, Florida 33428
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
Date of submittal/Projected meetin2 dates:
SUBMITTAL / RESUBMITTAL 11/02/00
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE:
PUBLIC NOTICE:
TRC MEETING:
PROJECTED RESUBMITTAL DATE: N/A
ACTUAL RESUBMITTAL DATE: N/A
2ND REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: N/A
LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS POSTED N/A
(SITE PLANS):
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD 12/12/00
MEETING:
CITY COMMISSION MEETING: 12/19/00
COMMENTS:
J:\SHRDATA\PlanningISHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Wood Partners (Alta Chase)\Alta Chase (Wood Partners Code Review)\PROJECT TRACKTh'G INFO. doc
. APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE L rE:
FEE PAID:
RECEIVED BY ."AFF MEMBER:
RECEIPT NUMBER:
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
ZONING CODE VARIANCE APPLICATION
SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: SEE SCHEDULE OF DATES FOR BOARD ME
SUBMITTAL DATES:
Please Print (in ink) or Type
Submittal Date:
The undersigned owner(s) hereby respectfully petition(s) the Planning and Development Board to
grant to petitioner(s) a special exception or variance to the existing Zoning or Sign Code of said City
pertaining to the property hereinafter described and in support thereof state(s):
Property involved is described as follows:
Lot(s) 0000
Block
006
Subdivision
25
Plat Book
67
Page 47-49
Property Address West side of S.W. 8th Street, approximately 1/8 mile north of
Woolbright Rd.
Variance requested: "Off-Street parking requirements shall in no event be less than two
(2) spaces per dwelling unit." Ch 2.5, Sec. 9, C. Boynton Beach Land Development
Regulations. This variance request is to allow 1.9 spaces per unit in a Planned
Development District.
The following documents are required to be submitted with this application to form a single package.
Incomplete package will not be accepted:
1. Two sealed surveys by a registered surveyor in the State of Florida, not over six (6) months
old, indicating:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
All property lines
North arrow
Existing structures and paving
Existing elevations
Rights-of-way, with elevations
Easements on or adjacent to the site
Utilities on or adjacent to the site
Legal Description
Number of acres to the nearest one-hundredth (1/100) of an acre
Location sketch of property
Page 2
Zoning Code Variance Application
K. Surveyor's Certificate
2. Two site plans properly dimensioned and to scale showing:
A. All proposed structures
B. All existing structures that are to remain on site
C. Setback lines for all structures drawn perpendicular from the property lines to the
closest vertical wall of structures
D. Use of each structure (or uses within multiple occupancies)
E. Use of adjacent properties including right-of-way lines for all streets and alleys,
sidewalks, turn lanes and driveways
F. Elevations of the lowest finished floor of all structures on the site
3. Certified list of names and post office addresses of property owners and legal descriptions of
their property within 400 feet of subject property, as recorded in the County Courthouse,
including a tax map showing placement of 400 feet boundary. Such list shall be accompanied
by an Affidavit (see attached) stating that to the best of the applicant's knowledge, said list is
complete and accurate, as well as labels or addressed envelopes and postage (1st class--
stamps or payment for required postage).
4. Proof of ownership of property by petitioner(s), such as deed or purchase contract agreement.
If an agent is submitting the petition, a notarized copy of a letter designating him as
such must accompany the petition.
5. Statement of special conditions, hardships or reasons justifying the requested exception or
variance. Respond to the six (6) questions below (A-F) on a separate sheet (Please print or
M&
A. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure
or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings
in the same zoning district;
B. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the
applicant;
C. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special
privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, buildings or structures in the
same zoning district;
D. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the applicant of
rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms
of the Ordinance and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant;
E. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure;
F. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose
of this chapter and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or
otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
Page 3
Zoning Code Variance Application
6. An application fee in the amount of $400.00 plus postage, payable to the City of Boynton
Beach, must accompany a completed application. The $400.00 application fee covers a
request to vary one (1) section of the Code. Seeking relief from more than one section of the
Code will require payment of $100.00 for each additional Code section.
7.
Name and address of owner:
First Baptist Church of Boynton Beach
clo Nicholas Pisco, Trustee
301 N. Seacrest Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
8.
9.
Name of applicant:
Applicant's address:
Wood Partners
21135 White Oak Ave.
Boca Raton, FL 33428
561-893-0094
Applicant's phone #:
10.
Name of agent:
Agent's phone:
Kilday & Associates
1551 Forum Place, suite 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
, 689-5522
;
.frj
C\-~\S ~Qj\
Representative of the project must be present at all Technical Review Committee,
Planning and Development and City Commission meetings held to review this project.
Date: ('0 I ~ r:; I L' a
Agent's signature:
11.
TO BE COMPLETED BY PLANNING AND ZONING
1.
Property is presently zoned:
formerly zoned:
2. Property Control Number:
3. Denial was made upon existing zoning or sign requirements (list section(s) of Code from which
relief is required):
4. Nature of exception or variance required:
Page 4
Zoning Code Variance Application
5. Case Number:
TO BE FILLED OUT BY BOARD
Meeting Date:
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD: Approved
Aye
Stipulations:
Signed:
Denied
Nay
Chairman
Page 5
Zoning Code Variance Application
CERTIFICATION
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THE ATTACHED LIST IS A TRUE AND
CORRECT LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN FOUR HUNDRED (400) FEET OF THE
APPLICANT'S PROPERTY.
APPLICANT/AGENT
cJfj's ~I
?\A~ ~ ~5CG~(
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS
FOR
REZONING AND/OR LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT
CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL
ZONING CODE VARIANCE
All applications received by the City of Boynton Beach after August 1, 1985 shall be
accompanied by mailing labels with the names and addresses of all property owners within
four hundred (400) feet of the subject property. Applications will not be accepted without
these mailing labels.
CONTACT --
PALM BEACH COUNTY
PROPERTY APPRAISERS OFFICE
A TTN: MAPPING DIVISION
301 North Olive Avenue
West Palm Beach, Florida
(561) 355-3881
S:IPLANNINGISHAREDIWPIFORMSIAPPS\zNCv\zNCV.APP
October 15, 1998
StP.10. 20000, 5:56?~M WOOD PART~t~SJOCIATES
111._ ~EICATlON
(I) (We) understand that this application and all papers and plans submitted herewith become a
part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Division (I) (We> hereby certify that the
above statements and any statements or showings in any papers or plans submitted herewith are
true to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and belief. This application will not be accepted unless
slgn'ed acco . tnJetions below.
-p~ -~ ~!~
. .
SIg re of OWner(s) r T , of Oate
Authorized Principal if prcperty Is owned by
a corporation or other business entity.
N(\ 1971-' n 2
v. i_r. -
11U. I j I r. 4
IV.
!l~T10N OF AGE~
rid
Signature of Authorized Agent
i~l (CD
Date
(I) ~e) hereby designate the above signed person as (my) (our) authorized agent in regard to this
application.
~ I! Oc,
Date
Sig a re of Owner(s) or
or Authorized Principal if p is owned
by a corporation or other business entity.
AUG. H. 2000 5: 08PM
III. CERTIFICATION
KILDAY & ASSOCIATES
NO. 731
P. 4
(I) fMJe) understand that this application and an papers and plans submitted herewith become a
part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Division (I) rNe) nereby certify that the
above statements and any statements or showings in any papers or plans submitted herewith are
true to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and belief. This application will not be accepted unless
sign'ed according to the instructions below.
~~~~
~ure of OWner(s) or Txlllstee, ~f c.-+r,.."f !Hw~.te-r Date ~f t, 2-1
Authorized Principal if property is owned by
a corporation or other business entity.
IV.
AUTHORIZATION 01?iJtt
Signature of Authorized Agent
1/;,(CD
Date
(I) ~e) hereby designate the above signed person as (my) (our) authorized agent in regard to this
application.
ign ure of Qv.m~. ~1 ur T. Ul:tR1e, tl"'It
uthorized Principal if property is owned
by a corporation or other business entity.
"'~M""-
Date St. pr. ~I