APPLICATION
1
,
j/. ":'
"'., _ lL. ':~.
. .L....
PROJECT NAME: Bethesda Memorial Hospital Parking Lot Expansion
LOCATION:S. W. 24tb Ave. (east of Sea crest Blvd.)
I FILE NO.: LUAR 00-001 II TYPE OF APPLICATION: I
LUAR/REZN
AGENT/CONTACT PERSON: OWNER! APPLICANT:
Russell Morrison Bethesda Memorial Hospital (Robert B. Hill)
PHONE: 561-840-0819 PHONE: 737-7733 x4454
FAX: 561-863-8175 FAX: 735-7006
ADDRESS: 4431 Embarcadero Dr. ADDRESS: 2815 Seacrest Blvd.
West Palm Beach, FL 33407 Boynton Beach, FL 33435
DATE:
SUBMITTAL / RESUBMITTAL
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE:
PUBLIC NOTICE:
TRC MEETING:
PROJECTED RESUBMITTAL DATE:
ACTUAL RESUBMITTAL DATE:
2ND REVIEW COMMENTS DUE:
LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS POSTED
(SITE PLANS):
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
MEETING:
CITY COMMISSION MEETING:
COMMENTS:
S:\FORMS\PROJECT TRACKING INFO
APPLICATION ACCETA. B:E DATE:~
' - RECEIVED BY ~TAFF Ml 3ER:
FEE PAID: /~ 00,0)
RECEIPT NUMBER: /)j7rf
.
L..J+(( - 00 -OO!
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPUCATION
This application must be filled out completely and accurately and submitted, together with the
materials listed in Section II below, in two (2) copies to the Planning Department. Incomplete
applications will not be processed.
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL INFORMATION.
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1.
Project Name:
&~c.sdc.. rVleMoJ"i J Ho~-P~+c. I PCv'" k I",,~ Lot
8 )( pc.., ~ i t:.~
2. Type of Application (check one)
a. Rezoning only
b. Land Use Amendment Only
x c. Land Use Amendment and Rezoning
3. Date this application is accepted (to be filled out by Planning Department):
4. Applicant's Name (person or Business entity in whose name this application is made):
~dc.. Me~t>r\o l M05 p~-\-c.l
Address:
.28\5" 5eccre~+-
~ b'fV\-t-b rJ ~ ecCV\
Phone: 5lc>\ 737 773"'J x~LiSlt
(3luJ.. .
Ft...
FAX: 5cP/
'33Y~S"
(Zip Code)
135 100(&
5. Agent's Name (person, if any, representing applicant):
t?usse Il MC>r(,'~c~
Address:
41.0\3\ E V"\ no/cc.deo Drive.
We5+ R:. \IN\ ~eC<.Yt Fe-
'33Yo'1
(Zip Code)
FAX: S~\ B~3 SI"\S'
Phone: S~\ BL{t> D8\~
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Board
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICA nON
6. Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name:
Address:
Phone:
(Zip Code)
FAX:
7. Correspondence Address (if different than applicant or agent):
N') A
*This is the only address to which all agendas, letters, and other materials will be
mailed.
8. What is the applicant's interest in the subject parcel: (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, Builder,
Developer, Contract Purchaser, etc.)
0'-'-' (\ e.r
9.
Street Address or Location of Subject Parcel:
(Of /\c,r .:>t-
?-'~
./" '
, I o,.......Jv'\:.~ \.... "P
.
0\0.\ o-f
(( c.'1. ~t?
10.
Legal Description of Subject Parcel:
L-otS ;,2q ''1' so
H''6~ Po,'\t'
i1'S C:c() -t
( J....
::::>Co-II::>;-...J
''-1:- S
11.
Area of Subject Parcel (to the nearest hundredth (1/100) of an acre:
. Y 8 l1e.12G'
I
13.
Proposed Zoning District:
~ -.\ A A
c>. \
12.
Current Zoning District:
14.
Current Land Use Category:
Proposed Land Use Category:
~ "Lo~J
15.
DC.
Dell.,':-. . 1--- I
r
Of\\ '-"G C ~ ,,,-,\ ""'I C' r C , u-t
Page 2
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Board
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLlCA nON
fu-I
PGr \t, ;,>1 'b
i-+OSrd-~ ~ef'/ po' \t... ,'l~ ~+--) d-......(
I()~ ~ /''1 If~L( - Mo//\ ..-- /i~soc(6---teS
i. 0+-
E7f)u/'!.:J'j c:.~
I
16.
Intended Use of Subject Parcel:
{J/'epc; 'e~
17.
Developer or Builder:
~&J.VtfC, d/u ,;VI ~0-toI ,UL t.+o~D ,,\--J
'\,( ! IVlle,LI ~ I+?/ 11
I), , .'Vl 16( - i..f.o ',,\
~ .I\-\ti,,/ tiD/.^ (/ '\ t
,
Mor~c/\ 'r- Gli-IJ,'td 'J:.IlG.
II. MATERIALS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
18. Architect:
19. Landscape Architect:
20, Site Planner:
21. Civil Engineer:
22. Traffic Engineer:
23. Surveyor:
\L. ,/\'\, k.,-/.. Ho., ,^ b''l t .1-s50C.1 Ld-e<,
,
jA ,'l\ Ic,{ ," liD',,,,- G,1.C--
ksscc-uJteS
,,' '1 J I/sSDC ,<-"'kc,
0:"td .f)s'~((vfe.<-,
;fs~')eo uks
The following materials shall be submitted in two (2) copies, unless otherwise indicated:
(please check)
~ This application form.
_b. A copy of the last recorded warranty deed.
_c. The following documents and letters of consent:
_(1) If the property is under joint or several ownership: a written consent to the application
by all owners of record,
_(2) If the applicant is a contract purchaser: a copy of the purchase contract and written
consent of the owner and seller, and
~) If the applicant is represented by an authorized agent: a copy of the agency
agreement, or written consent of the applicant, and
_(4) If the applicant is a lessee: a copy of the lease agreement, and the written consent of
the owner, and
Page 3
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Board
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICA nON
If the applicant is a corporation or other business entity: the name of the officer or
person responsible for the application, and written proof that said person has the
delegated authority to represent the corporation or other business entity, or in lieu
thereof, written proof that he is in fact an officer of the corporation.
~ A sealed boundary survey of the subject parcel by a surveyor registered in the State of Florida,
dated not more than six (6) months prior to the date of submission of the application, at a scale
prescribed by the Planning Department. and containing the following information:
/( 1) An accurate legal description of the subject parcel.
~)
~
(5)
~ A complete certified list of all property owners, mailing addresses, and legal descriptions for all
properties within at least four hundred (400) feet of the subject parcel as recorded in the latest
official tax rolls in the county courthouse shall be furnished by the applicant, including a tax
map showing placement of 400 feet boundary. Postage, and mailing labels or addressed
envelopes must also be provided. Said list shall be accompanied by an affidavit stating that to
the best of the applicant's knowledge said list is complete and accurate. Notification of
surrounding property owners will be done by the City of Boynton Beach.
~ A copy of the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's maps showing all of the properties
referred to in paragraph e. above, and their relation to the subject parcel.
A computation of the total acreage of the subject parcel to the nearest hundredth
(1/100) of an acre.
A tree survey, which conforms to the requirements of the City of Boynton Beach Tree
Preservation Ordinance. (Also refer to Page 6, Sec. II h.(12) of this application if
property is occupied by native vegetation.) This requirement may be waived by the
Planning Director where found to be unrelated to the land use or zoning issues
involved with the application.
_g. A statement by the applicant justifying the zoning requested, including reasons why the
property is unsuitable for development under the existing zoning and more suitable for
development under the proposed zoning.
~ A ..;omparison of the impacts that would be created by development under the proposed
zoning, with the impacts that would be created by development under the proposed zoning,
with the impacts that would be created by development under the existing zoning, which will
include:
_(1) A comparison of the potential square footage of number and type of dwelling units
under the existing zoning with that which would be allowed under the proposed zoning
or development.
_(2) A statement of the uses that would be allowed in the proposed zoning or development,
and any particular uses that would be excluded.
_(3) Proposed timing and phasing of the development.
Page 4
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Board
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICA nON
t!.0(4) For proposed zoning of property to commercial or industrial districts, where the area of
the subject parcel exceeds one (1) acre, projections for the number of employees.
(5) A comparison of traffic which would be generated under the proposed zoning or
development, with the traffic that would be generated under the current zoning; also,
an analysis of traffic movements at the intersections of driveways that would serve the
property and surrounding roadways, and improvements that would be necessary to
accommodate such traffic movements. For projects that generate move than five
hundred (500) net trips per day, a traffic impact analysis must be submitted which
complies with the Municipal Implementation Ordinance of the Palm Beach County
Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance.
(a) For projects that generate two thousand (2,000) or more net trips per day, the
traffic impact analysis must be submitted to the City at least 30 days prior to the
deadline for land use amendment and/or rezoning, in order to allow for timely
processing of the application and review by the City's traffic consultant and
Palm Beach County. The applicant shall be billed for the cost of review by the
City's traffic consultant.
(b) For projects that generate between five hundred (500) and two thousand
(2,000) net trips per day, the traffic impact analysis must be submitted at the
application deadline for land use amendment and/or rezoning, in order to allow
for timely processing of the application and review by Palm Beach County.
However, if it is the desire of the applicant to utilize the City's traffic consultant
for review of the traffic impact analysis prior to review by Palm Beach County,
then the procedure and requirements outlined under item "a" above shall be
followed.
NOTE: Failure to submit traffic impact analysis in the manner prescribed above may delay
approval of the application.
rJJA:.(6)
For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison of the water demand for
development under the proposed zoning or development with water demand under the
existint, zoning. Water demand shall be estimated using the standards adopted by the
Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such demand, unless different
standards are justified by a registered engineer. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the water system shall also be included, where existing facilities
would be inadequate to serve development under the proposed zoning.
~(7)
For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison of sewage flows that would be
generated under the proposed zoning or development with that which would be
generated under the existing zoning. Sewage flows shall be estimated using the
standards adopted by the Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such
flows, unless different standards are justified by a registered engineer. Commitment to
the provision of improvements to the sewage collection system shall also be included,
where the existing facilities would be inadequate to serve development under the
proposed zoning.
Page 5
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Board
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICA nON
~iA-(8)
For proposed residential developments larger than one (1) acre, a comparison of the
projected population under the proposed zoning or development with the projected
population under the existing zoning. Population projections according to age groups
for the proposed development shall be required where more than fifty (50) dwellings, or
50 sleeping rooms in the case of group housing, would be allowed under the proposed
zoning.
t-1..M-(9)
At the request of the Planning Department, Planning and Development Board, or City
Commission, the applicant shall also submit proposals for minimizing land use conflicts
with surrounding properties. The applicant shall provide a summary of the nuisances
and hazards associated with development under the proposed zoning, as well as
proposals for mitigation of such nuisances and hazards. Such summary shall also
include, where applicable, exclusion of particular uses, limitations on hours of
operation, proposed location of loading areas, dumpsters, and mechanical equipment,
location of driveways and service entrance, and specifications for site lighting.
Nuisances and hazards shall be abated or mitigated so as to conform to the
performance standards contained in the City's zoning regulations and the standards
contained in the City's noise control ordinance. Also, statements concerning the
height, orientation, and bulk of structures, setbacks from property lines, and measures
for screening and buffering the proposed development shall be provided. At the
request of the Planning and Development Board or City Commission, the applicant
shall also state the type of construction and architectural styles that will be employed in
the proposed development.
~(10)At the request of the Planning Department, Planning and Development Board, or City
Commission, the applicant shall also submit the following information:
_(a) Official soil conservation service classification, by soil associations and all areas
subject to inundation and high ground water levels.
_(b) Existing and proposed grade elevations.
_(c) Existing or proposed water bodies.
_(d) Form of oWolership and form of organization to maintain common spaces and
recreation facilities.
_(e) A written commitment to the provision of all necessary facilities for storm
drainage, water supply, sewage collection and treatment, solid waste disposal,
hazardous waste disposal, fire protection, easements or rights-of-way,
roadways, recreation and park areas, school sites, and other public
improvements or dedications as may be required.
_(11)For rezonings to planned zoning districts, the specific requirements for submission of
applications for rezoning to such districts shall also be satisfied. Furthermore, all
materials required for a subdivision master plan shall also be submitted.
Page 6
.....
OJ, J 2/ lJO lIED JO: 58 FA.\ filjJ 813:, 133:12
[4J 003
KH1LCY-I10R~
,/
,
,
/
Clly of BD}'llton Beacb ,
Pl_1Da lid ZoDiq Bowel
LANP USB AMENPMBNT AND/OR. eZONING APPLlCAnON
(12)Wl1ere conformance with the county', En"lronmentall~ $Gnaltlv. Lands Ordinance Is
required, an Application for Alteration of Environmentally Sensitive Lands (Environmental
Impact Study) m'Jet ba submitted to the Palm Beach County Department of Environmental
Resources Management (COpy to City) prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the land
Use Amendment and/or Rezoning Application to the CiW.
fII, 8PPL.JCATION FEE~
Fees shall be paid at the time that the IIppJlcatlon 18 submitted, accordIng to the fees whJeh
have been adopted by ordlnanl:8 or resolUtion. The PlannIng Department will Inform the
applicant as to the feelS which are required. All f8AI ,,-hall be paId by check, payable to the City
of Boynton Beach.
IV. CERTIFICATION
(I) fINe) underetlnd thii'll this application and 811 pl.ns lIInd papera submitted herewith become
a part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Boan:l. (I) (We) hereby cartlfy that
the above stateme"ts and any statements or showings in any papers or plans submitted
herewith are truR to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and belief. Thl. application will not be
accepted unless signed according to the instructions beloW.
./"
~ it dd!
Signature of Owner(s) or Trustee,
or Authortzed Principal if property
Is owned by 81 corporation or other
business entity.
I-I ~ -(90
Date
v.
AUTtlORIZATION OF AGENT
~.c~
SIgn8lture of Authorized Agent
t/17/tJ?)
Oate( { ,
Page 7
'.- 1. j.} UU
"
--
,;'
I III 1 ,I : J tJ I \. \ ;, I; I <Hi .~ I; ,HI ~
1(1 \JLU--Il()~,'\
i4I 00.2
-
City of Boynton BelICh ,
PlaruUna e.nd Zonln& Board
LANP USE AMENDMENT AND/OR JtEZONING APPLICA nON
page 8
(I) (\IV.) hereby designate the above signed person as (my) (our) authorized agent with regard
to this IIpplfcation.
&IJ- ff /&/
_Sfgn8ture of OWner(s) or Trustee. or
Author1led Principal If property
Is owned by a c:orporatlon or other
buslnes. entRy.
/-1] -Od
Date
~#
----~----------._----_. -
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Board
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICA nON
SPACE BELOW THIS LINE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Review and Processing Schedule:
Date Accepted by Planning Department
Date Transmitted to City Clerk
Date Notifications Mailed to Surrounding Property Owners
Dates of Advertisement in Newspaper (rezoning and/or land use amendment)
Dates of Advertisement in Newspaper (annexation)
Date of Transmission of Departmental Review Forms to Department Heads
Date of Review by Technical Review Committee
Date of Pre-Hearing Conference
Date of Public Hearing Before Planning & Development Board
Date of Public Hearing Before City Commission
Date of Transmission of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Florida
Department of Community Affairs, pursuant to Florida Statutes, F.S. 163.3184 (1) (a)
Date of Transmission of Proposed Comprehensive P,dn Amendment to Other
Governmental Agencies Requesting Notification, Pursuant to Florida Statutes, FS.
163.3184 (1) (b)
Date of Receipt of Notice from Florida Department of Community Affairs Regarding
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, pursuant to Florida Statutes, F.S. 163.3184 (4)
Date of Hearing Before Florida Division of Administrative Hearings, Pursuant to Florida
Statutes, F.S. 163.3184 (5) (b)
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Board
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICA nON
Date of Hearing Before City Commission on Revised Comprehensive Plan Amendment,
Pursuant to Florida Statutes, F.S. 163.3184 (6) (a)
Date of Transmission of Revised Comprehensive Plan Element to Florida Department of
Community Affairs, Pursuant to Florida Statutes, F.S. 163.3184 (6) (a)
Date of Receipt of Notice from Florida Department of Community Affairs Regarding
Revised Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Date of Hearing Before Florida Division of Administrative Hearings, Pursuant to Florida
Statutes, F.S. 163.3184 (7)
Date of First Reading of Ordinance to Annex
Date of First Reading of Ordinance to Rezone and Amend Future Land Use Map
Date of Second Reading of Ordinance to Annex
Date of Second Reading of Ordinance to Rezone and Amend Future Land Use Map
Date of Expiration of Zoning
Date of Expiration of Time Extension for Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Board
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICATION
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR SITE PLAN,
CONDITIONAL USE, PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT,
SUBDIVISION, OR OTHER APPROVALS
RE: Plans, Elevations, and Other Documents Submitted to City Commission and Board
Meetings
Any documents prepared by applicants which are distributed at the public meetings must be
provided, at a minimum, in the following quantities in order to allow each Commission or Board
member to have a copy, as well as the City Manager, City Attorney, Recording Secretary,
Planning Director, and Building Official:
City Commission:
10 copies
Planning and Development Board:
12 copies
Community Appearance Board:
12 copies
Also, for any site plans, master plans, and elevations which are submitted for the record at
Commission or Board meetings, and which are revisions to plans or elevations which were
previously submitted to the City, six (6) copies of the revised plans or elevations must be
subsequently submitted to the Planning Department. Furthermore, any colored elevations
which are exhibited to the Boards or Commission which are different from those which were
previously submitted must be submitted to the Building Department so that the building color
and elevations can be inspected prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
These measures will allow the City to have an accurate record of the project as it was approved
by the Commission or the Boards, and will allow for the efficient inspection of the project.
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Board
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICA nON
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR APPROVAL OF LAND
DEVELOPMENT ORDERS OR PERMITS
Please be advised that all applications for the following land development orders and permits
which are submitted on or after June 1, 1990 will be subject to the City's Concurrency
Management Ordinance, and cannot be approved unless public facilities (potable water,
sanitary sewer, drainage, solid waste, recreation, park, and road* facilities) would be available
to serve the project, consistent with the levels of service which are adopted in the City's
Comprehensive Plan:
- Building permit applications for the construction of improvements which, in and by themselves,
would create demand for public facilities.
- Applications for site plan approval.
- Applications for conditional use approval.
- Applications for subdivision master plan approval.
- Applications for preliminary plat approval.
- Applications for final plat approval.
- Applications for rezoning to planned zoned districts.
- Applications for revisions to any of the applications listed above, which would increase the
demand for any public facility.
* Applications for development orders and permits submitted after February 1, 1990 and which
generate more than 500 net vehicle trips per day, must comply with the Palm Beach County
Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, unless exempt from that ordinance.
Please be advised, however, that the following applications will be exemot from the
Concurrency Management Ordinance, pending final approval of this ordinance by the City
Commission:
- Applications for the development of property which was platted on or after January 13, 1978
and either the final plat or the preliminary plat and Palm Beach County Health Department
permit applications were submitted or approved prior to June 1, 1990, and the use of the
property is consistent with the general use which was intended for the property at the time of
platting.
- Applications for the development of property which was platted prior to January 13, 1978, the
area of the platted lots does not exceed 2 acres, and the proposed use would not generate
more than 500 net vehicle trips per day.
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Board
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICA nON
_ Applications for building permit, if a site plan or conditional use was submitted prior to June 1,
1990 and subsequently approved, and the site plan or conditional use has not expired.
_ Applications for the development of property within an approved Development of Regional
Impact, and which are consistent with the approved DR!.
_ Applications for approval of final plats, if the preliminary plan and application for Palm Beach
County Health Department permits for utilities have been submitted prior to June 1, 1990.
_ Applications for revisions to previously approved development orders or permits, which do not
increase the demand for any public facility.
Please be advised that these exemption rules are tentative and will be subject to final approval
by the City Commission.
If you have any questions concerning the proposed Boynton Beach Concurrency Management
Ordinance, please contact the Boynton Beach Planning Department at (561) 375-6260.
S:\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\FORMS\APPS\LUAR\LANDUSE.WPD
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Board
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICA nON
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS
FOR
REZONING AND/OR LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT
CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS VARIANCE
All applications received by the City of Boynton Beach after August 1, 1985 shall be
accompanied by mailing labels with the names and addresses of all property owners
within four hundred (400) feet of the subject property and postage (1st class stamps or
payment for required postage). Applications will not be accepted without these mailing
labels and postage.
CONTACT --
PALM BEACH COUNTY
PROPERTY APPRAISERS OFFICE
ATTN: MAPPING DIVISION
301 North Olive Avenue
West Palm Beach, Florida
(561) 355-3881
Justification Statement
Impact Comparison
Bethesda Memorial Hospital proposes to expand its parking area to the east site
of Seacreast Boulevard to accommodate the increasing need for parking.
Bethesda proposes to utilize lots 58, 28, 29, and 30 of the Plat of Highpoint.
At this time lots 58 & 28 are currently zoned C-1 which permit general
commercial uses. These general commercial uses are associated with increased
demand on City services including wastewater, potable water, police and fire
services, traffic and other general City services. The proposed parking lot will not
over burden the existing City services. Parking lots do not generate the same
demand on services as general commercial uses permitted under the C-1 zoning
district.
Both lots 29 & 30 are currently zoned R-1AA and would permit the development
of two single-family homes. Again the proposed development of the parking lot
will has less of an impact on City services than the development of two single
family homes.
The concern relative to the intrusion of commercial into and existing developed
neighborhood will be mitigated through the installation of a 6 foot wall and
landscaping.
JAN. 14.2000
3:38PM
STRAWN MONAGHAN COHE
'-
-
n'tfAG~Ol : FJ....99-74717-2 11/16/1999 1l:28:01am
!'rin,1'II fo, Iaw)In' Tille GVOIO"" held. OrlculllD, FIef....
Thi. lltslllllUllt WIlli ".,.l'1li br.
Charles E. PIlQU, Jr.
1'AM1~~u
GOD ...,........
1110...--....
SOILftUOD,aoBIDA. SIClIO
JJ .atrantg leal (STATUTOI1' FOIM-SEOION 6".112 F.s.)
r
-t
-c rm,u Jdrnt1lrr. fl'oac:l. 'hit
o
-f W~'lNB L. NOU ana SKI1U.EY M. .KOYS, his wi.f.
y
'~f1.
lIS 4 . inllltrll
do, 01
11"
CD of the COIItIty of 'Browara . StOle., Plorida
TRANSWORLD ASSOCIATES, INC. I a Florida Corporation .",-co
..:..
. lI'lIIlIOr'. Clad
wbo.. post oHic:e _dteu~. cIa r.dwazod Sura-w, 100 II. E. 5efl. .AWIlUe., na1l:'ay !leach. YL 33444
It 01 "'It County of . SIll" 01 I'loriCla . grunl....
(lir... .'
~ tW...t.,. Tl1ClJ M1ic:llillQntor. 11Ir lIn" ;" eAMlitoratloll ollho lunt 01 'lEN and NO/IOO~-~~---------
-----------------------------($10.00)-------------------------------~~
'If ond olh" gtIOd ood 1IOluablo CONiC/_foM to tald "11/1'" Nt ""nd Paid b)' solel ,ra",", ,he roceipl ....NClI Is .....by
~ ac6:nawlodlillld. has .....,.d, hrgalMd eel ... to 1M aid qrantee. /lAd gran'.... !lei,. Clod QSSillns fort.<er. .h. IolIlIIUillll
~ de~nlled'MId. Iltu-. IyIn. "1Ie1 ""II ;., Pallll BeaeJ\ Cou...,. FlMido. to-wII,
E
z
cs:
tor
~
o
~
Z
a:
::J
....
~
SEE LEmU. DESCRIPTION A'l'TACHRD HERE'I'O AND MADE A PAR'l' HEREOF.
Subjec~ ~O restdations, limitations and conditions of record
and ,ubject to easement for pab1ic utilities of record. and
appl1cable loninq ordinances and taxes for the year 1.9S4 and
. subsequent years, if any.
Q"
.~o a,hO
,. c, -{ - ~
~ 1./(1.0
t lj 1
and ICIrd lI'on!or daIS -rebr fuly wmrQllt tho III'" to ...id Iaod. 0ftCI .... lI.lend th. """" againll ... howf,,' clCll... of ..
p.."",... wh__.
· "Gn!nJDr" and '011-," o~ used for '"gub. Of' plutel. as CClMOllt ~f..5.
Grutor hell. h.N1111tO "' ",.n~.'flrolld Qnd ,..... ,h. da, ..nel yea, 11m obov. wrillell.
r it! "yt..L ~ ~ (Seal)'
~I' . L. '1eYb.. H'_ .
~~ ~ - (5111b
hideY'M. Moye, his wife
/Seoll
.. ($eGO
STATE Of Ftoa.tM
C:OUNlY 0' SROIfARD
I HEREIY CERTlF'l' !he! Oft Ihla .y _r.,. m.. DII Clff,a. ... ~llI5fied .. talc. ocknowllClalllVl'" ".r_1lr appe.nd
WAYNE t. MOW ana SBtM.!Y M. MOn, hi~ wiofa"t ..
~ '10 me blown to be tho ptI""n!l dcscribecI ill Clncl who aIQItId ~:~:~~~n'
If:I t.". y ..-,'lid 1" sa..... : ~'.,";;.. , . .
cP) 'NlTNESS m" hond lIIId ofIIciol ... lit !he c-ty DlId $.... Io~ ~N4kI ~ '.: .
-.. 1984 , '! ,~.
...... ~ ~
..
IIr'
..
Ct
My _iuion ..,."
,.
- ,
. '. ,,""_:.. Nlllal"l,;
.. ,".
'.~srAlI crfLQlllR~ CIa
. MY Q;lMMr$5IQUIl'IIIS NWL 21 "IS
1o:l'035!HIlI ~ 116.lHlEIWtJ1H5
NO. 258
c::I
.-:1
-,
~
..,
...
..
P.2
Page 1 of 3
JAN. 14.2000 3:39PM
STRAWN MONAGHAN COHE
IMAGF.Ol : FL-99-74717-2 llJ16Jl99911~:Olam
...
~- ...
I;~ on
a;; -
~," ...
...
..
-
..
~
NO. 258
'-100
,-
.-
: .
....
-
",
,..
C I
,,"J
~
<>
.;
,
-:
..,,:
:~
. .~
I ;
"
..
P.3
Page 2 of3
JAN. 14.2121121121
3:39PM
STRAWN MONAGHAN COHE
IMAGE91 : FL-99-'14717-2 11/16/199911:28:01un.
LEGAL DBSCRInION:
Lota 28, 29, 30 and sa of HIGH POINT, according to the
Uat thereof, %eaordec! in flat Book 23, Paqe 225, of the
Pulllic Jtecol'4s of palm &each Count.y, Florida.
I.es~ and except:
'!\fo parcels of l-and for ~cad dght"oF-Way pu!:poses lying
in the !;authwa1: 1/4 of Secti'On 33, Township 4S SQuth,
Range 43 Eut. Palm Beach COllll\ty, noddA, R\Ot'e pa.rtiC\llarly
4esc: ibed. as follows;
All of ~at portioD of I.ct a9, plat of High Point, Plat
Book 23, Pais 225, Public Jteecrds of PalJll Beach COlmty,
ly1ftg' Nortbwest of the.lonq chord of a tangent curve, said
curve havin9 a radius of 25.00 feet and being tangent: to
tbe .sou~erly dght:-of-way line of 5E 24th Avenue IH1qhlal\d
Street) ane! ~e Easterly right"of-way line of Seac:rest
Boulevard as shown on the aforemandoned pla.t.
AND
All of that. portion of Lot 58, Plat of High Point.. Plat: Book
23, page 225, P'ub11.c 1'ecords of PalJll Beach County. lying-
Southvesi: of the lang chord of a t.1ln9ent: curve, aaic1 curve
having it. radius of 25.00 feet. ana. being tlU\g-ent i:O the Nort.h-
edy ri.g'ht-of-t,ay line of SE 25th Avenue (Bit'ch Street) and
~h. Sactarly right:-o~y ~ine of S8acrest Boulevard as Bhown
on the aforementioned plat.
...
.
A.
'"
II')
~
-
~
RECORO VERlFletl
II!1oLM BEACH COUNTY FLA
. . J0t4M a. OUNI<l~ ItJJ
~y. CIRC\Il'l' CQ\lft
NO. 258
P.4
Page 3 or3
~=n
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Bethesda Memorial Hospital
Traffic Analysis for 2450 Sea crest Property
It is proposed to construct a parking lot with approximately 80 parking spaces on
property located on the east side of Sea crest Boulevard between S.E. 24th Avenue
and S.E. 25th Avenue in Boynton Beach, Florida. The parking lot would help to
alleviate demand during peak periods at Bethesda Memorial Hospital, which is
located south and west of the proposed parking lot. Construction of the parking lot
is projected to occur in 2001.
Two issues were addressed in consideration of the traffic impacts of this project.
One is the additional traffic that will be generated by rezoning a portion of the
property that is currently residential. The other issue is to analyze the operation of
the intersection along Seacrest Boulevard that is to serve as the access point to the
proposed parking lot.
Trip Generation Comparison
The parking lot is proposed to be built on approximately 1.45 acres of land that is
currently divided into four smaller lots. The two lots with frontage on Seacrest
Boulevard, which combined comprise approximately 0.95 acres, are currently zoned
for commercial use and would not require rezoning in order to construct a parking
facility for the hospital. The other two lots, which are on the south side of S.E. 24th
Avenue, measure a combined total of approximately 0.5 acres and are currently
zoned for residential use. These two lots would need to be rezoned for commercial
use also in order to construct a portion of the parking lot on the two lots.
To analyze the impact of this zoning change, trip generation was estimated for a
likely use at the site. Although the site is proposed to be used only for a parking lot,
trip generation was conducted for a medical office building assuming a floor area
ratio (FAR) of 0.25. Medical office building was used for the trip generation
comparison because it represents the highest trip generating land use that can
reasonably be expected on the property. Parking lots do not have any inherent trip
generation potential. The increase in traffic was determined by comparing the trip
generation for the currently zoned uses with the trips that would be generated by the
proposed rezoning of the two residential lots. This analysis is shown in attached
Table 1. The projected net daily increase in traffic is 162 trip ends per day.
Driveway Analysis
The parking lot is proposed to be constructed with one full-access driveway
connecting the driveway to S.E. 24th Avenue. To determine the impact caused by
vehicles accessing the parking lot from this driveway, the intersection of Seacrest
Boulevard & S.B. 24th Avenue was analyzed.
P:\044301 000101 00, doc
~=n
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Kimley-Hom and Associates conducted an existing turning movement count at S.E.
24th Avenue & Seacrest Boulevard during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods on
December 21, 1999. Intersection volumes were factored to peak season conditions
using the peak season adjustment factor published by the Florida Department of
Transportation. These peak season volumes were then projected for 2001
conditions by applying growth rate of 0.82 percent per year, compounded annually.
The result was the 2001 peak season background traffic conditions.
To provide a conservative analysis of traffic to and from the parking lot during the
a.m. and p.m. peak periods, it was assumed that each parking space generates one
trip during both of the peak periods. Based on a proposed capacity of eighty
parking spaces, eighty trips into and out of the parking lot were evaluated during
each of the peak periods. During the a.m. peak period, 90 percent of these eighty
trips were calculated to be inbound trips and 10 percent were calculated to be
outbound trips. The opposite was assumed for the trips during the p.m. peak period.
All of the parking lot traffic was assigned to Seacrest Boulevard via S.E. 24th
Avenue in order to travel to and from the parking lot. An assignment to Seacrest
Boulevard of 50 percent north and 50 percent south was used in the analysis.
Turning movement volumes were developed for traffic to and from the parking lot.
These volumes were then added to the 2001 peak season background volumes to
determine the total 2001 traffic conditions at the intersection of Seacrest Boulevard
& S.E. 24th Avenue after construction of the parking lot.
Using methodology from the 1987 Highway Capacity Manual, the total traffic
conditions were analyzed at the intersection of Seacrest Boulevard & S.E. 24th
A venue in order to determine the Level of Service at the intersection. As shown in
the attached analyses, the intersection is projected to operate acceptably in both the
a.m. and p.m. future peak hours.
Conclusions
The construction of a parking lot on the property will not create adverse traffic
conditions. The increase in potential trip generation caused by rezoning the two
residential lots would potentially add a total of 162 trip ends per day. A peak hour
analysis showed that, even with conservative assumptions regarding parking
demand and turnover at the site, the intersection at Seacrest & S.E. 24th Avenue will
operate acceptably.
P: 104430/00010/ 00. doc
~=n
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
TABLEt
BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: LAND USE CHANGE
TRIP GENERATION
Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Trips Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit
Existinl! Zoned Use
Medical Office 10,475 s,[, 358 25 20 5 38 10 28
Single-Family 2 d,u, 2Q 2 1 1 .1 2 1
Subtotal 378 27 21 6 41 12 29
ProDosed Site Traffic
Medical Office 15,800 s,f. ~ .1li .lQ .8. ~ U II
Subtotal 540 38 30 8 56 15 41
Net New Trips 162 11 9 2 15 3 12
Notes: Trip Generation was calculated using the following data:
Daily
Medical Office [P.B,c.] = T = 34,17 trips per 1,000 s,[.
Single Family Residential [P.B.c.] = T = 10 trips per dwelling unit
A.M. Peak Hour
Medical Office [ITE 720] = T = 2,43 trips per 1,000 s,f. (80% entering, 20% exiting)
Single Family Residential [ITE2l0] = T = 0,75 trips per dwelling unit (25% entering, 75% exiting)
P.M. Peak Hour
Medical Office [ITE 720] = Ln(T) = 0,921 * Ln(X) + 1.476 (27% entering, 73% exiting)
Single Farnily Residential [ITE 210] = Ln(T) = 0,901 * Ln(X) + 0.527 (64% entering, 36% exiting)
p:\044301000\{tg_bethesda,xls}seacrest@ 24th (I driveway)
1/11/00 11:46
Location: SEACREST BLVD. & SE 24th ST.
City: State: BOYNTON BEACH FL.
Counter: RRC, BA
Day of week: TUES.
.
_ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc..
4431 Embarcadero Drive
West Palm Beach, Florida
33407
File Name : SEACRE24
Site Code : 12219901
Start Date : 12/21/1999
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Unshifted
Grand Total
Apprch %
Total %
23
0.9
0.4
2608
98.6
49.3
151
0.6
0.3
6
20.0
0.1
o
0.0
0.0
241
80.0 I:
0.5
1
0.0
0.0
2578
98,8
48.8
31 I
1.2
0.6
1
100.0
0.0
o
0.0
0.0
o.g I
0.0
5287
ea our rom
Intersection 07:45
Volume 10 755 4 769 2 0 6 8 1 533 5 539 0 0 0 0 1316
Percent 1.3 98.2 0.5 25.0 0.0 75.0 0.2 98.9 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume 10 755 4 769 2 0 6 8 1 533 5 539 0 0 0 0 1316
Volume 4 215 0 219 1 0 3 4 0 146 2 148 0 0 0 0 371
Peak Factor 0.887
High Int. 07:45 07:45 07:45 6:45:00 AM
Volume 4 215 0 219 1 0 3 4 0 146 2 148
Peak Factor 0.878 0,500 0.910
Peak Hour From 12:45 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1
Intersection 16:00
Volume 5 631 8 644 0 0 11 11 0 815 11 826 1 0 0 1482
Percent 0.8 98.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 98.7 1.3 100.0 0.0 0.0
Volume 5 631 8 644 0 0 11 11 0 815 11 826 1 0 0 1 1482
Volume 4 181 0 185 0 0 3 3 0 229 0 229 0 0 0 0 417
Peak Factor 0.888
High Int. 16:00 16:15 16:00 16:45
Volume 4 181 0 185 0 0 4 4 0 229 0 229 1 0 0 1
Peak Factor 0.870 0.688 0.902 0.250
~=n
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: LAND USE CHANGE
SEACREST BOULEVARD @ S.E. 24TH AVENUE
Growth Rate =
Peak Season =
Buildout Year =
Years =
0,82%
1.07
2001
2
A.M. Peak Hour
Intersection Volume Development
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT
Existing Volume (12/21/99 0 533 5 10 755 0 0 0 0 2 0 6
Peak Season Volume 0 570 5 II 808 0 0 0 0 2 0 6
2001 Background 0 580 5 11 821 0 0 0 0 2 0 7
New Project Traffic 0 0 36 36 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
Total 0 580 41 47 821 0 0 0 0 6 0 11
P.M. Peak Hour
Intersection Volume Development
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT
Existing Volume (12/21/99 0 815 11 5 631 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
Peak Season Volume 0 872 12 5 675 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
2001 Background 0 886 12 5 686 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Project Traffic 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 36
Total 0 886 16 9 686 0 0 0 0 36 0 48
p: 10443010001{tg_bethesda,xls]seacrest@ 24th (I driveway)
1/11/0011:46
HCS: Unsignalizec
:ersections Release 3.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS
Analyst: KHA
Intersection: Seacrest & 24th Avenue, Total Traffic
Count Date: 12/21/99
Time Period: 2001 A.M. Peak
Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St.
Vehicle Volume Data:
Movements:
2
3
4
5
7
9
Volume:
HFR:
PHF:
PHV:
580
611
0.95
0.02
41
43
0.95
0.02
47
49
0.95
0.02
821
864
0.95
0.02
6
6
0.95
0.02
11
12
0.95
0.02
Pedestrian Volume Data:
Movements:
Flow:
Lane width:
Walk speed:
% Blockage:
Median Type:
# of vehicles:
TWLTL
o
Flared approach Movements:
# of vehicles: Eastbound 0
# of vehicles: Westbound 0
Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2
L T R L T R
L
Lane 3
T R
N Y N N Y Y N N N
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
L T R L T R L T R
N Y N N Y N N N N
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Lane usage for movements 7 . 8 &9 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
L T R L T R L T R
Y
N
y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Channelized:
Grade:
N
0.00
Lane usage for movements 10,11&1~
Lane 1
L T R L
proach:
Lane 2
T R
L
Lane 3
T R
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Channelized:
Grade:
N
0.00
Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shared In volume, major th vehicles:
Shared In volume, major rt vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles:
Number of major street through lanes:
Northbound
o
o
1700
1700
2
Southbound
o
o
1700
1700
2
Length of study period, hrs:
1. 00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation.
Critical Gap Calculations:
Movement 4 7 9
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t c,base 4.1 7.5 6.9
t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0
P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02
t c,g 0.2 0.1
G 0.00 0.00 0.00
t 3,lt 0.0 0.7 0.0
t c,T:
1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00
t c
1 stage 4.1 6.8 6.9
Follow Up Time Calculations:
Movement 4 7 9
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t f,base
t f,HV
P hv
t f
2.2
1.0
0.02
2.2
3.5
1.0
0.02
3.5
3.3
1.0
0.02
3.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.
9
12
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
327
669
1. 00
669
0.98
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Step 2: LT from Major St.
4
1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
654
929
1. 00
929
0.95
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Step 4: LT from Minor St.
7
10
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt
Movement Capacity
Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations
Shared Lane Calculations
Movement
v (vph)
Movement Capacity
Shared Lane Capacity
Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS
Movement
1
v (vph)
C m(vph)
vlc
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
49
929
0.05
9.1
A
7
1------
I
I
6
180
342
4
7
1------
I
1
18
342
0.05
16.1
C
16.1
C
1163
188
1. 00
0.95
0.96
0.96
180
8
9
------11
/I
II
12
669
8
9
------11
/I
II
10
10
11
12
11
12
HCS: Unsignalizec
:ersections Release 3.1b
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS
Analyst: KHA
Intersection: Seacrest & 24th Avenue, Total Traffic
Count Date: 12/21/99
Time period: 2001 P.M. Peak
Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St.
Vehicle volume Data:
Movements:
2
3
4
5
7
9
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volume:
HFR:
PHF:
PHV:
886
933
0.95
0.02
16
17
0.95
0.02
9
9
0.95
0.02
686
722
0.95
0.02
36
38
0.95
0.02
48
51
0.95
0.02
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestrian Volume Data:
Movements:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flow:
Lane width:
Walk speed:
% Blockage:
Median Type:
# of vehicles:
TWLTL
o
Flared approach Movements:
# of vehicles: Eastbound 0
# of vehicles: Westbound 0
Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2
L T R L T R
L
Lane 3
T R
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N Y N N Y Y N N N
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
L T R L T R L T R
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N Y N N Y N N N N
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
L T R L T R L T R
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Channelized:
Grade:
N
0.00
Lane usage for movements 10,11&1~
Lane 1
L T R L
proach:
Lane 2
T R
N
N
N
N
N
Channelized:
Grade:
N
0.00
L
N
N
Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles:
Shared In volume, major th vehicles:
Shared In volume, major rt vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles:
Number of major street through lanes:
Length of study period, hrs:
1. 00
Northbound
o
o
1700
1700
2
Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation.
Critical Gap Calculations:
Movement 4 7 9
t c,base 4.1 7.5 6.9
t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0
P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02
t c,g 0.2 0.1
G 0.00 0.00 0.00
t 3,lt 0.0 0.7 0.0
t c,T:
1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00
t c
1 stage 4.1 6.8 6.9
Follow Up Time Calculations:
Movement 4 7 9
t f,base
t f,HV
P hv
t f
2.2
1.0
0.02
2.2
3.5
1.0
0.02
3.5
3.3
1.0
0.02
3.3
Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
Step 2: LT from Major St.
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
Step 4: LT from Minor St.
9
475
536
1. 00
536
0.91
4
949
719
1. 00
719
0.99
7
Lane 3
T R
N
12
10
N
Southbound
o
o
1700
1700
2
1
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt
Movement Capacity
Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations
Shared Lane Calculations
Movement
v (vph)
Movement Capacity
Shared Lane Capacity
Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS
Movement
1
v (vph)
C m(vph)
vlc
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
9
719
0.01
10.1
B
7
1------
I
I
38
147
251
4
7
1------
I
I
88
251
0.35
27.1
D
27.1
D
1321
148
1. 00
0.99
0.99
0.99
147
8
9
------II
II
II
51
536
8
9
------II
II
II
10
10
11
12
11
12
EE ::Jas - SS7 dM 1 - 3D BUt : NJIl VJOl .OOZ = . I : 31VJS
000Z-81:l-70
~
l ,..,... c:::J I I ,..,... ~ I
, '" , m I 0 = I -
,.,.. ..t-,-" en b 2S, m
en i'-" N~mlh~l~ ~~~~ ~
~ en ~ '~, ~~~ ~ I = , ~ ' '"
3S /: 1E .,~ I:f.-.. - * = ,
~ -.. /' ~ $ ~ l ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ i ~ ~ -
t-: - ~ - - - - - - - -~ - - ----HJ~lJ~- - -1-- - - - ~ - - - - - - ~ - - - - ~ - --inti:
,7 i r r:; ~:\-! \- "
X ,., <-\ i 'f! " Ii'" ! 0; 1\ ,,! "
~ ". i - lO i '" rf'!" \" !I"
"-.-., ~'-" : '" .. / I ~ I
....... ~ ~ I -..; , Ln ' c;
......."-.-. ~ - ,'~ ~ I '-" I
fA "" ' 'l: ~ !ife ~ i"~ '" N ; 8
o " '" ~ '" I . . .. ..' 1 l' i .~ ~ &l i ~ -
"-.-. ~".">".,:, u> '-" , ~,
~ "-.-. ,',,' ,.,. .," :,' I en I
~ f _'" I' . .ii [;;: OJ = I, ,.
-.. R ;3' "-.-., I '..:.' ,.'.. '",' "./:> I I 0
~ ,.... "-.-.1,"-.-. } "., .i...H> i u; as' i 2
'" '~ ",..,.... ..:." lJ), ' j ,
~ ~~ .~~H J \ . 3l ..~ \ ~
<:::j ~ ::-~, ~ entn .-J -,J I 8=;,
lO~) ~ ':'~<~~~ ,~ ilJ~
Lf)' '" C'l l~'
,
"-.-.
-N '"", ~ I
,
"-.-.
>-
f-
I--
/
-I
~I
.-ffi
-,
007 - 0 D
::$.:
s~::Jarqns ~:.
~3SJV~ddV Al~3dO~d AINnOJ HJV38 W1Vd i
V3J 'SlI10nIN .~ A~V3
:Rah
=
en
...n
'-"
=
, '"
r-
I g;
=:
r
=
""
"
'(
~
en
.......
m
-..
"
,/
~
/
I
:,.."
~
:::;
~
r---
~
\~
In
o~ ~
" h- .......
~~I
",~"n~
=
:z
i; ~ g ~t-
'"
!~ r:;N
1;0 (Ii
~
-..
C>
:::
"-.-.'
,I
"-.-.
m
2--__
l.Ll
~ :;;
n -
"
i
n
lJ) ~
QJ
en
en
'"
=
""
=
==-
_ en
\ ~'
0,
, en
mH
~~
17I
'-"
=:
en
=
m
m
M
~
~
~~
-...l
'l
--,
,....;01
~ - i
~
, I
I
, l
~. '_J
~-n Kimley-Horn
IIII.J_ U and Associates, Inc.
In-house Parking Study
BETHESDA MEMORIAL
HOSPITAL
BOYNTON BEACH, FL
Prepared for:
Bethesda Memorial Hospital
Boynton Beach, Florida
040596.00
July 1999
Revised August 1999
<D Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
~l
,-,
. '!
,
;:,-,J
\
~'j','
'.
~=~
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
INTRODUCTION
..... ...............................................................1
EXISTING CONDITIONS.................................................. ..............3
FUTURE CONDITIONS... .......... ..... ....... ...... ........ ........................... 7
ALTERNATIVES FOR PARKING EXPANSION .................................10
CONCLUSIONS ............................... ........................... ............... 15
APPENDIX A
PARKING DEMAND OBSERVATION
APPENDIX B
EXISTING AND FUTURE PARKING NEEDS
04059600-0899
Page i
]
~
i
,:,::,j
"I
~q
o..obI
'J
..i
:"j
, t
, ,
~=~
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
LIST OF TABLES
Table No.
Title
Page
1
2
3
Hourly Parking Demand for the Entire Site........................ 3
Future Inpatient and Outpatient Growth ............................8
Comparison of Options for Parking Supply Expansion ........ 13
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No.
Title
Page
1 Site Location Map ............ .......... ......... .......... ......... .............. ........ 2
2 Existing Parking Areas ... .......... ........... ........... .......... ..:...... ..........4
3 Parking Alternatives ............ ........ ........... ........... ...... ........... ....... 12
04059600-0899
Page ii
:--\
I
. ~ J
, -1
,I
rJ
~=~
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
INTRODUCTION
Bethesda Memorial Hospital is a 440,000 square foot hospital located in Boynton
Beach, Florida. The location of the hospital is shown in Figure 1. Currently, the
hospital provides 1,066 parking spaces for employees, visitors and patients on
surface lots that encircle the hospital complex. The number of existing parking
spaces is inadequate to meet the current demand by about 150 spaces during the
peak season. In addition, the hospital plans to expand its facilities through several
phases over the next ten years, which will further increase the demand for parking.
Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. was retained to conduct a parking study at the
hospital in order to identify the magnitude of the current parking shortage and the
future parkirig demand. Data for the report were collected in April and future
growth projections were supplied by Bethesda Memorial Hospital staff.
Improvement scenarios were identified and then refined by hospital representatives
through AUIDlst 1999. This report represents the fmal results of the data collection
and analysis of this project.
This report has been prepared for project team use and is not intended to be suitable
for submittal to review agencies.
04059600-0899
Page I
g
m
...J
~
t
5
::Ii
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD.
Iii
...
a:
o
~
en
OLD BOYNTON RD.
ci
a:
...
o
z
...
a:
~
;-~
WOOLBRIGHT RD.
GOLF RD. S.W. 23rd AVE.
,.....
O:'.i
:~r.-i PIPERS GLEN BLVD.
~ g
en
en m
...
a: Iii
COCONUT ~. u
z ...
0 a:
0 0
-<
~ ...
ci en
~
:0<: Z
0
0 tz
~ i
-< en
m
LAKE IDA RD.
~
d
Q)
C,)
q
LOWSON BLVD.
I g
::Ii m
o
:z:
~
c
Z
N
oJ
Z
C,)
.~
"'f,,)
a
........'
"'f,,)"
~
ci
a:
en
::Ii
Iii
...J
:c
a:
~
t
5
~
--~
1
, .1
UNTON BLVD.
,
~,-:j
,=:;
~
Ii:!
)
FIGURE 1
BETHESDA HOSPITAL
SITE LOCATION MAP
NOT TO SCALE
~_n KimIey-Hom
~_u and Associates, Inc.
.
0401598.00
....OHIIOO\IC1'M-1I1' 7-2-1,"
~=~
~.-l
, ,1
J
...J
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The hospital parking field is divided into several distinct areas. Various parking
lots are restricted for use by visitors, physicians, and other hospital employees. The
existing parking demand was monitored for each of the parking areas.
Kimley-Horn staff monitored the parking conditions at Bethesda Memorial Hospital
on Wednesday April 7, 1999. Data collection was done on an hourly basis from
8:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. For the purposes of recording the data, the parking lots
on the site were classified into six different areas, as shown in Figure 2. The total
number of occupied spaces is shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1
HOURLYP~GDE~FORTHEENTIrnES~
Spac~s Percent
Time of Day OccupIed Supply Capacity
8:00 a.m. 840 1066 73.8%
9:00 a.m. 997 1066 93.5%
10:00 a.m. 1033 1066 96.9%
11:00 a.m. 1045 1066 98.0%
12:00 p.m. '1032 1066 96.8%
1 :00 p.m. 1031 1066 96.7%
-
2:00 p.m. 1001 1066 93.9%
3 :00 p.m. 930 1066 87.2%
4:00 p.m. 759 1066 71.2%
5:00 p.m. 558 1066 52.3%
6:00 p.m. 466 1066 44.7%
04059600-0899
Page 3
"
"
A
B
GOLF RD.
23rd AVE.
,....,
,..~
, ..I
25th AV.
, I
~
, ,
"
~
IliiJ
J
FIGURE 2
BETHESDA HOSPITAL
EXISTING PARKING AREAS
NOT TO SCALE
~-n KinIey-Hom
-.....J_U and Associates, Inc.
o
0406118.00
t:'~ '..-1'"
~=~
~:
~j
-i
--~---- ~ --- - ---
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Although the overall parking demand at the site never exceeded 100% on the day
during which the observations were made, some parking areas within the site
experienced periods during which the number of parked cars surpassed the number
of available spaces. Not all of the vehicles that were parked on the site were parked
in marked spaces. Table A.I in Appendix A shows the hourly breakdown of the
parking on a lot-by-Iot basis. Because different parking areas had various
restrictions on parking, some inefficiency is experienced (e.g., parking is available
in the physicians' lot but not in the visitors' lot).
Based on standard traffic engineering principles, the parking supply should be
designed to accommodate the tenth highest hour of demand. Because the
observation of existing parking conditions was not made during the peak season,
which lasts from January to March, the parking demand was calculated for peak
,
season conditions. Daily inpatient census data were obtained from Bethesda
Memorial Hospital to accurately project the demand for parking during the peak
season.
On the day in which the parking observations were made, the inpatient census
documented a total of 232 inpatients being treated at the hospital. Because
outpatient census data were not available on a daily basis, only the inpatient data
were used to convert data to the peak season. The greatest number of inpatients
treated at the hospital on a single day was 280, which occurred on February 26,
1999. In order to calculate the tenth highest hour of demand, the ten days with the
greatest number of inpatients were identified. The hourly parking demand for each
of those ten days was assumed to be directly proportional to the parking demand
observed on April 7, 1999 based on the number of inpatients at the hospital.
04059600-0899
Page 5
-~- --------
~=~
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Calculations indicate that the total demand will equal 1216 parking spaces during
the tenth highest hour of parking demand. Because 1066 spaces are currently
provided on site, the existing shortfall is 150 spaces. The calculations showing the
parking demand for the existing ten highest days and tenth highest hour are
included in Table B.I in Appendix B.
Parking areas for non-residential uses, such as a hospital, require a vacancy of 5 to
10 percent in order to facilitate efficient parking. With no vacancy (e.g., 1216
spaces are provided with a demand of 1216 spaces), a motorist would be required
to circle through a lot until someone else pulls out of a space. For the existing
conditions at the hospital, the recommended parking to accommodate the existing
demand is 1277 to 1338 spaces.
04059600-0899
Page 6
-- ~------~-----------------------
~=~
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
FUTURE CONDITIONS
Bethesda Memorial Hospital is expecting an increase of inpatient and outpatient
visits in the future and has proposed a multi-phased expansion/renovation of the
existing facility to accommodate this growth. Utilizing future growth projections
provided by Bethesda Memorial Hospital staff, the parking demand was calculated
for the year 2010. To predict the future parking demand, two components were
considered: inpatient demand and outpatient demand. These projections include the
effect of known expansion plans.
According to Bethesda Memorial Hospital inpatient census projections, the 2010
peak demand will be 380 inpatients. This represents a 35.7 percent increase over
the 280 inpatients that were cup-ently treated during the 1999 peak demand day.
Outpatient demand projections for the hospital were available on an annual basis
through the year 2009. The annual demand was projected one additional year, to
2010, by applying the same growth constant that was applied to the years 2004
through 2009. Using this estimate, 204,208 outpatient visits are projected for the
year 2010. The annual outpatient visits for 1999 are projected to be 133,761,
representing a 52.7% increase in annual outpatient visits.
Although the future demand was estimated on an annual basis, empirical monthly
outpatient data from October 1998 to April 1999 were also provided by Bethesda
Memorial Hospital. By calculating the ratio of 1999 annual outpatient demand to
20 I 0 annual outpatient demand and applying it to the observed demand in February
and March 1999, the demands for February and March 2010 were estimated.
04059600-0899
Page 7
~=~
, -1
"!
.~
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Unlike inpatient demand, which is reported by number of patients, the outpatient
demand is reported by the number of procedures. Because an outpatient may have
more than one procedure performed during a trip to the hospital, the number of
visits does not reflect the actual number of patients that travel to the hospital. It
was assumed that, on average, each outpatient will have two procedures performed
during one trip to the hospital. Therefore, the number of outpatient visits was
divided by two in order to estimate the actual number of outpatients.
To convert the monthly outpatient projections into daily numbers, the average
number of outpatients per day was calculated. It was assumed that the inpatient
demand ratio of the highest day to the average day was the same for outpatients
also. This ratio was applied to the 2010 projected average daily outpatient data in
order to predict the peak day of outpatient demand in 2010. The results of the
inpatient and outpatient calculations are summarized in Table 2.
TABLE 2
FUTURE INPATIENT AND OUTPATIENT GROWTH
Equivalent
Year Inpatient Peak Outpatient Peak Total
1999 279 164 443
2010 380 250 629
Percent Increase 36% 53% 42%
The overall parking demand is expected to increase 42 percent above the current
level. Because the total parking demand at the site is currently 1,216 spaces, the
increase translates to a future total demand of 1,727 spaces. The future demand is
based on the assumption that the 10'h highest hour of inpatient demand and 10th
highest hour of outpatient demand coincide with one arlother. Tables B.l and B.2
04059600-0899
Page 8
~=~
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
in Appendix B show the 10 highest days and 10lh highest hour of overall demand at
the hospital for 1999 and 2010, respectively.
In addition, 5 percent to 10 percent was added on to the future demand in order to
account for vehicle turnover. Inefficiencies resulting from restrictions that are
placed on the parking spaces need to be addressed to provide spaces for each type
of parking activity. The final result is that between 1,813 and 1,900 spaces are
expected to be needed in the year 2010 to satisfy the parking demand during the
tenth highest hour. Because the hospital currently provides 1,066 parking spaces on
site, the projected future shortfall is between 747 and 834 parking spaces.
In the event that the parking solution would be implemented incrementally at the
hospital, the parking demand was predicted on a year-by-year basis from 2000
.
through 2010. Therefore, if the parking demand for the year 2010 cannot be
satisfied immediately, the supply can be increased in stages to meet the expected
demand during interim years. The anticipated yearly demand as well as the yearly
projected parking shortfall is shown in Table B.3 in Appendix B. The prediction
of annual demand was calculated as a straight line interpolation between existing
and future demand.
04059600-0899
Page 9
~=~
,.......~l
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
AL TERNA TIVES FOR PARKING EXPANSION
Options
To accommodate this increase in demand, the following options for parking
expansion were identified by the Bethesda Memorial Hospital staff:
1. Northwest parking lot - converting to a three-level garage
2. Northwest parking lot - converting to a two-level garage
3. Northeast parking lot - converting to a three-level garage
4. Northeast parking lot - converting to a two-level garage
5. 23rd Avenue property (north of hospital) - constructing a surface parking
lot
6. 23 rd Avenue I Seacrest Boulevard property - constructing a surface parking
lot
7. 2800 Seacrest Boulevard property - constructing a surface parking lot
8. 2800 Seacrest Boulevard property - constructing a two-level garage
9a. 2800 Seacrest Boulevard property - constructing a two-level garage + J
story building
9b. 2800 Seacrest Boulevard property - constructing a three-level garage
10. Early Learning Center border expansion - constructing a surface parking
lot
11. Westchester residential area - constructing a surface parking lot
Table 3 lists the approximate number of parking spaces that could be added by each
option listed above. The actual number of spaces that can be built on a site is
highly dependent on a number of factors, including site configuration, parking
space dimensions, and landscaping requirements. The estimates provided in this
04059600-0899
Page 10
~=~
~.-)
......
I
,--,
, I
.' !
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
report are based on general parking space, island and aisle widths but do not
represent the exact number of spaces that could be built on each proposed site.
Final parking space counts would result from the actual design of parking areas.
Figure 3 references the parking areas listed in Table 3.
Costs
The cost of constructing any of these options involves several factors, which cannot
be accurately estimated without actually designing and bidding the parking facility
for construction. To provide a basic guideline, the probable costs for the
construction of the spaces and the acquisition of property were used. The probable
cost figures do not include additional costs such as the demolition of existing
structures, grading of land, landscaping, etc. The following cost guidelines were
used for the construction of the parking spaces alone:
.
Parking garage: approximately $10,000 per ~pace
Surface Parking lot: approximately $2,000 per space
.
Table 3 shows the probable cost of the parking development and land acquisition,
as well as the probable unit cost of each parking space added for each of the parking
options. Land acquisition costs were supplied by hospital representatives.
04059600-0899
Page 11
GOLF RD.
~
,..----,
N.W. I
PARKING I
GARAGE I
CD@i
I
I
I
I
I
)
/
/
"" /
.... /
OV
.,
,
'I
~
~
)
NOT TO SCALE
t:\~ '-4-IIft
23rd AVE.
r - N~.- - -: L _ ~~: ~~ :~R~~L _ ~_ _ /~~I
I PARKING I r,..-.:-.,-- - - --- -------'"
I GARAGE III I
r;::)\ fi\ III I
I ~~ III I
I .-__JII I
I I II I
I I II I
I II I
I I II I EARL Y
I II II ILEARNING
I I II I CENTER
I II IBORDER
'- ...1 II I EXP ANSI ON
- - 1If.in\1
II@I
II I
WESTCHESTER
RESIDENTIAL
AREA
@
n__-' J
&.;--------------
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
~
~
~
(
,
,
,
,
FIGURE 3
BETHESDA HOSPITAL
PARKING AL TERN A TIVES
~=~ =Iesl~.
o
0405118.00
~=~
IN
,)
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Option 11, which is the acquisition of33 homes in the Westchester residential
area to the northeast of the hospital, results in more land than is necessary to
meet the parking demand of the hospital. After subtracting the amount of land
that would be necessary to accommodate the projected hospital's 2010 shortfall
of 834 parking spaces, approximately 202,160 square feet would still remain. If
this remaining land is used to construct a medical office building and the
additional parking that would be required, the medical office building could
have a maximum size of 64,600 square feet if it is a one-story building, or
84,200 square feet if it is a two-story building. This assumes complete coverage
of the property and would therefore not allow for on-site retention of
stormwater. Landscaping, open space requirements, or other conditions
resulting from the approval process, may alter the ultimate yield ofthe property.
.
All of the parking solutions identified previously focus on increasing parking
supply at the hospital. It is also possible to address the parking shortfall at the
hospital by evaluating options that are aimed at reducing parking demand. One
option is to charge a fee for parking at the hospital, which would increase vehicle
turnover rates and encourage carpooling. Another is to provide carpooling
incentives such as preferred parking, or transit incentives such as subsidizing bus
fares for employees to take transit to work. Also, to reduce parking demand during
the peak hours, efforts could be made to schedule more outpatient surgery and
minor procedures during times of lower parking demand, such as the early morning
and late afternoon. Such programs alone would not eliminat~ the entire projected
shortfall of parking spaces, but could help reduce the future parking demand at the
hospital.
04059600.Q899
Page 14
,"
,
r-':J
j
f .,1
~ )
(oj
::. i'
..
..
....
c:
..
U
~
c:
1:
..
.
~
b
..
- .
e= ~
;t:: ..
CoI'5
(I) "'Cl
C c:
=~
b
...l
~
c:
:a
=
u
><
~
-
e=
.C
c
e
~
~
~
"0
(I)
~
.c:I
-
~
=
.
~
"'Clo-
Bo-M
cn~c....
:fro:;:
:li2=so
""Q.CO
: < g,
~
~
~
c
~;
~j:l"
...l>c
~~
o
==
c
z
t
...
><
r,.l
b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
u . . . . '$. . . '$. .
< r-- 0 \D ., 0 M \D 0 "'It' ... \D
~ 0 iii 00 .... 0 0\ ..; 0 \Ci ~ ..;
t) ... N N ... 0 00 0 0 0- 0 0
... ... ... ... .... .... .... ... ....
'$.
~ ~
b ....
u 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
...l ~ N N N N N M N N M N N
t)
0
Egj .... III \D N 00 V> '" 00 " 0 '"
<8 M M M M N M N N M M N
~u
1;1)0
b ~ ~ ~fft. tt':J!.
u . . '$. '$. '$. ~"$.
< ., 0 0- \D V> 00 \D .... 0 \0 M
0 NO . "'It'
~ .... ....: ,...; ~ \D . ,...;....:
6 0 0 .... .... 00-
... - 0- 0- r-- .... - _00 '" 00
'$.
u ~
Eo< ....
0 U r-- r-- " " r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- t- "
< .... .... "'It' ~ ~ .., .... .... .., "'It' "'It'
...l ~
<
u
0
~~
~8 '" r-- \0 ~ V> M N 0 M "'It' -
..,. ..,. ..,. M III III III "'It' "'It' ..,.
e;u
0
b ~ f!. ~ ~ ~
u '$. '$. . . . . ':!!. ':!!. '$. ':!!.
< .... .., N .., 00 0 0 0
- 10 M M - 0
~ ci ....: 0 0 ... N 0 vi N ci ,...;
< 0- 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0- t- 10 V>
U - .... .... .... ....
'$.
= ~
f-o ....
U M M M M M M M M M M M
0 < V> V> III III III III III V> V> V> V>
...l ~ M M N N N N N M M M M
<
u
E@ 00 r- ..,. .... Ie 0- III ~ M N "'It'
<8 N "'It' III III III III :Q 00 III M
N N N N N N N - - -
e;u
0
~
U '$. '$. '$. '$. ':!!. '$. <f!. ':!!. <f!. ~~
< 0 0
N 0 - '<t; OC! t- N 10 r-; t- 0-
~ ....: N ,...; M M N cO N - \0";
< 00 0- Cl\ Cl\ 0- Cl\ 00 t- V> M N
U
'$.
< ~
f-o U 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0 < 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
...l ~ N N N M M N N N M M N
<
U
0
~e3 - III 00 0- 0 r-- ....0- Cl\ t- M
~8 ~ \0 \0 \0 r- \0 V> 0 :!: r- \0
N N N N N N N
I;I)g
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
0 C) 0 '? 0 0 C) 0 0 00
00 0\ c; ... N .-; . on .0 ;:'00
.... - - - .... .... .... .... ....
d
.E
ur
Q)
E~
~ti
~.:2
E"C
s::a
~
II
~
r I
I'
~
-
u <te.'i/..<te.'i/.. '$.~"#.. <te. ~'$.~
'....:.....-- ~ 00'00\0 00 I'- '0\ N NMI'-
00";,000 ,0,0"; ~ r::~~
6 1'-0\0\0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 00
<te.
t \Q \Q \Q \Q \Q\Q\O\Q\Q \Q \Q
U \Q \0 \Q \Q \0 \0 \0 \0 \Q \Q\O
-< 00 00 00000 00
l:l.o - - -- ..... -- ..... ...... ...... --
l5
:e~ 0 I'- ,M ~ ~ -;;; 0 ~ 0\ 00 I'-
'<8 ..,. 0\..... '0 '0 I'-
00 0\0 ~"-~ S ~ Q\ 1'-'0""
l:l.ou -
fl)o
t::I ~
~
0 <te. <te. <te. ;1!. <te. ;1!. ;1!. ~~~"#.
~ ~ V'\ C'\ r-: N co I'- -\000
t::I -<i 0\ N ~ 0 .0 0\ onoonon
~ 0\ 00 C'\ 00 C'\ I'- \Q \Q I'- '0 '0
"
Z ;1!.
... ~ ~
< "
~l:l.o !ooc 0 C'\ 0- 0- 0- 0\ C'\ 0- 0- C'\ 0- 0-
...;l> 0 -< 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 00
~~ ...;l ~ - - - - - - - -
U
0
=: Q
" B~ M -
Z ~~ 0 00 0 V'\ 0- M \Q - I'- 0 0
t - 0- 0- 0\ 00 I'- I'- I'- \0 \Q
X
- ~
~ b
+01
.- ft.
c.. u <te. '$.~ ~ ft. <te. ~~ "$.<te.
.
f'-l -< N ..,. N 0\ 0- 0\ N -..,. NO d
Q l:l.o .-l 0\.0 ..... c:; c:; 00 r-..:.-l r-..:-<i .E
== -< V'\ 00 C'\ 0 0 0 C'\ C'\ 00 '" ..,.
u ... ... ... 0
- ;1!. Q)
~ EE
.- 08
"'" ~ :I:",
Q ~ ~.:2
e !ooc ti ... ... ... - - ~
0 -< ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. 13"'0
~ ...;l l:l.o M M ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... S2~
~ -<
U ~
~ ....
'0 'l:IC'\ Q
~ .Bo-N B~ II
U22::... 00 on 00 - ..,. ..,. '0 - - '00
..c::I llII _ 0 ~8 I'- 0 N 1Il ..,. ..,. M M 00 ~~
r:::I'-N ..... M M M M M M N ~
+01 32:g,u
~ fl)U
'" 00 0
= d:-<11
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 Cl '? 0 Q 0 Q Q Q Q
r::: 00 0:. c; - N .o.i . .n -0 r:. 00
- ... ... ... ... - ... - ...
, ,
I
~=~
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
APPENDIX B
EXISTING AND FUTURE PARKING NEEDS
.;~ .
0\
-.. 0\
C\ ~
C\ M
C\ ......
0\
'1""'4 0\
I 0\
-
Ctl ......
.. 0\
= ~O\
.: ClI "-
QII'\
W) ..<::I
.... ...
..: &I
E:1 .c
Dll
W) ==
~ e 0\
&I 0\
= f-t~
~ Dll M
'1""'4 - oS
=5 W)
~ ...
.c: ~
~ Ctl ~ 0\
...:l .... ~
~ == .....
0 <::I
'1""'4
..
~ 0\
0\
2?
M
~
~
~ 0\
0\
~ ~
M
~ 0\
0\
;;0
~
e
0
;0\
ClIO\
t "-
~~
.&l
0
: i
. :I
0\
~
11'\
~
0\
~
0\
0\
~
M
\0.....011'\$00.....00\
~~~~~_:l:g::&G:;::
0'\_______
\0.....011'\...,.00.....00\
~N\OOO\O\OMII'\Oll)MM
"'----......- 00\0'"
0\______
\D~~~rt~~~~~;
~__ _~OO\C""'
MM...,.ooMNoo\OOOr-
~::!:_~O\~~~~~~~
...,~ - - --
M...,.ooMNoo\OOOr-
""'000\0000""'~""'$"'"
_:::::::::=_00 \n
"ClM
&1\0
i5.0\
=
...
...
o
..
&I
~V\O~~~~~~Ot;~
~S;::=~ -::O~\OV\
000N\008:2:;;lMO\II'\
S;~~~N~ O~~~
~O""'Moo
:..... ..,--.....
00_ NNN-
0\_ ,.....__
-
"""f'l"'\t'---
0\0\11'\\0
800\011"\
N 0\
\0 0
N -
N.....
\0 -
N -
$~
N -
\0 M
<0 M
N -
\00
\0 ...,.
N-
0\ r-
<0 ...,.
N -
OM
..... 11'\
N -
..... 0\
r- II)
N -
0\ M
..... \0
N -
~$
N -
N
.....
N
;.:.,
'e'
s
. . J!l
. . ::C:!1 ~ . . . .. J!i 5
~~<<~~~~~~::!1 ~h:l
<<8881lodl..~~~~ Dg.
.~ ? ? 0 ..:.: N ? ? ? ? ? ? I ! ~
....000\-- -N('f'\",,,,,\O_O
~~~fn;~~OO~i=:~
O-N""'NNN-O\\OV\
__-"1-"1-"1......__
~8t;~~;~~~~~
ONNNNNN-O\\OV\
__....c..............-.oII__
0S;~~~;;;8oO\ool=:
~O\o_~~_~~~~
~ ~ ~ :l
u u u u
cu cu It ft
Po Pop. P.
en en ." '"
\0 \0 f"- 00
\0 - t"'-- tf')
ON N M
--...
1
~
~
..,
ij
..,
.!,o
..,
..,
E
~
"ll
E
"
~
.~
~
I ~
~ 0.
~ ~
i;,O;i
~
='
o
.c
..
...
u
.c
.. bQ ..
il :E .0 ;f'-
"".,sCll=o
'> 0 VI ...
e-++
Po......"Cl"Cl
bQ "" C e
e e << ClI
:.>i! E E E
... u " ...
os",,"Cl""
PobQDllDll
fie.!:.!:
E :~ li li
= ~ W M
uw~~
'"
&I
...
os
C.
'"
Dll
e
;;2
...
..
P.
N
f"-
...
o
..
...
...
...
;;
<i
c
&I
Q
Dll
oS
'"
"..
~
d
.=
ur
(J)
E~
~~
t-cc
E"'C
S2a
~
II
~
ii
~ r- 0- r- on -.t' .... C!; 0: r- .,., .,., 10 00
:E -.t' 0- on r- on on - 0- 10 on 10
.... ~ \0 \0 \0 \0 ~ -.t' M CO r- .... -
- - - - - - -
oS
0
-
-
ii
.<:: r- 0\ r- on ...,. .... ;! 0: r- on on 10 0\
DO ...,. 0\ on r- on on 0\ \0 .,., r-
:E .... on \0 \0 \0 ~ \0 :! M CO r- M -
- - - - - -
-5
0\
-=
'"
... M r-
~ r- M 00 00 r- \0 r- M - QO -
on \0 00 \0 \0 0 M 0 r- on 0\
:E ..... \0 \0 10 \0 10 \0 on M 0\ r- ..... -
- - - - - - - - -
; oS
00
-=
'"
... O-.t' ."
.<:: r- .... - - 0 00 0\ r- - M
O(J \0 M 00 0 00 r- .....- ..... 0 r- \0 0
-.. :E ..... ~ ~ r- \0 \0 \0 on M 0\ r- ..... M
<:> - - - - -- -
- -.-5
<:> Or-
~ --
o ...
I ~ '"
...
4) ~~'C~ ..... - ;:; 0 QO 0 -.t' on 0\ r- - -.t'
a... M 00 00 r- M - ..... 0 r- \0 -
= CC .- '" \0 10 r- \0 \0 ~ on M 0\ r- ..... N
/:):I:c.~ - - - - - - -
-
= ... -5 ::I
e :J\O~
'<::-0
~... ...
~ 53:J..
>> c'fa~"'" - ;:; - 8 r- oo - 0\ 0\ .,., on ."
~ $ M 0\ $ ..... ...,. - 00 \0 N
~ .. ._ c. 00 r- ~ ~ ID ." M 0\ r- ..... N
E-:I:rn~ - - - - ... -
- .. -5
~ fI'.l ;."
= 4) ...-
.Cl ::I ...
CJl ~ '"
~ .,
.- 'fa 0\ r- r- r- on C!; ...,. \0 ...,. - 00 10 ...,. '" '"
~ == 00 $ 0 M 0 ." ..... ." M 00 ID M '" '" '" .. ..
:E ..... r- r- r- r- \0 .,., M 0\ r- ..... N ., ... ... OJ OJ
~ - - - - U ~ 0
<:> - - - - - '" .. ..
-5 '" c. c. c. c.
- c.
...,. '" '" '" ... III
f-I -= :EI~ I- ;,':! ID I- M 0 ...
~ 10 N QO C> ..
N 3- OJ
'" r- 0 ~ C\
... ~ - ... ..
.<:: ...,. N ..... ..... 00 I- - M C.
C>ll r- on \0 ..... '"
010 .... M N ..... 0\ I- .". .". ~
:E ...,.ID r- r- r- ID '" N 0\ r- M N
- - - - - - - - c
"E :!;2
~ ...
M ..
~ - - c.
ii ....
Co:) M
.<:: ...,. M M 1l'l N - 0 r- ID ..... '" 0\ 0- 00
; DO ..... 0 ID ~ \D \D 00 0\ on - r- ...,. .t; S
:E -.t' r- r- r- r- r- ~ M 0- 00 ..... N C
- - - - - - - - ;.; '" r-
'C e ;.:.. ....
c ::s r-
0 ... ::s
N ::I: 'C 0
i-I - .5 .<::
" i ~ ii ...
~ ... '"
0 .c: '" ...
0 00 - 0 C\ \D on M - ID 00 00 DO'" 'B~..
... ~ 0 r- C\ \D \D - 0\ 0 on - 00 '" .- e ~
'" r- r- r- r- r- r- ~ ..... C\ 00 .....N ::I: 0 ~.c:~
... - ~
.<:: - - - - - - 8.5 0 d
DO ~ 881l'l - .E
:E ! -';j!. c.-+ + .n
e DO'-''C 'C (I)
'" s= "d C c ... e]!
C ~ a .- s= .. .. u
~ '" ::I ~ '" e e c;: ~J
,!j> t.1.. co e .. .. ...
.. 0\ M ." N - ;:; 0 0\ 00 .... N '" "d c...."d"d 'C ~
t 0\ 0 I"- ..... (; ..... ..... M '" .,., I"- M .., ., _"C~.., ..
~ ...,. 0\ 0 0 0 0 0\ .... on .". N II <:; s:: v ... .... ...
00 0\ E'O
.. - - - - - '" ~ ... ::I ::I E
III ...,. :? a...... S2~
.c 'e' :3 =' = = ::I
0 '< Ut.1.. I<. I<. I<.
.; p..
~ ~
~
,....... "
'e- II II
s -
~~~~~~~~~~~ fl ~ ....
ti fi 8 '? ~
fi ':;1 ~ ::::
<<888ll.ll.ll.ll.ll.ll. ':;1 '" ~ 0.
... . ~ So 9 ~
.~ 88o':":N~~~~~~
!-< OOO\----Nf""\...V\\O .96 ... O<l
Q
~
Q
M
I
0\
0\
0\
~
c5
~ fIl
ClJ
U
~
Q.
fIl
~ I,Q
I,Q
~ ~ Q
. .-I
=
~5
...;lo
~~
~
~
~
~
f-c
U
e;
~
~ -ti
ClJ
't:l
.~
0
...
~
CG
C
~
...
~
~
...
c
ClJ
...
...
=
u
~------------- .------.- -_._-~---
f-4
~
u
s:: '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
u u u u u u u u u u u u
r;o;1 u u u u u u u u u u u u
Q <IS <IS <IS ~ ~ <IS <IS <IS <IS <IS <IS <IS
p.. go ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" '" '"
; M ~ ~ M ~ M V) V) '<t '<t '<t '<t
r- ~ 00 ~ 00 ~ 00 ~ 00 ~ 00 ~
M ~ ~ '<t '<t V) V) I,Q \0 r- r- OO
0 0 g g g 0 g 0 0 g g 0
- - - - - -
~ .... 0 r- '<t M 0 0 r- V) M 0 r-
I - r- - \0 - \0 - V) 0 10 0 '<t
M M ~ ~ '<t '<t V) V) \0 \0 r- r-
ff..
Q
....
+
't:l
C
~ 00 0\ 0\ 00 0\ 00 - .... 0 0 0 0
5 ~ 0\ '<t 0\ '<t 0\ V) 0 V) 0 V) 0
ClJ ~ ~ '<t '<t V) V) \0 r- r- oo 00 0\
Q .... - - .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
't:l
ClJ
-
U
ClJ
.CS'
...
~
~
It'l .
+
't:l
c
~
5 r- \0 ~ 0 00 \0 \0 ~ .... 00 \0 ~
ClJ r- ~ 00 ~ r- M r- M r- - \0 ....
Q M ~ ~ '<t '<t V) V) \0 \0 r- r- oo
.... .... .... .... .... .... - - - .... .... ....
't:l
4.l
-
U
4.l
Q'
...
~
"Cl
C
~
5
ClJ
Q
't:l \0 M r- M 00 ~ .... \0 - \0 M r-
~ .... r- .... \0 0 10 0 '<t 0\ ~ 00 M
<oJ M M ~ ~ '<t '<t V) 10 V) \0 \0 r-
ClJ .... .... - .... - .... .... .... - - - ....
.CS'
...
~
(;
-
0
f-4
Lo 0\ 0 - M ~ '<t V) \0 r- oo 0\ 0
~ 0\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ....
4.l 0\ 0 0 <:> <:> <:> <:> 0 <:> <:> 0 <:>
>c - M M M M M M M M M M M
d
.E
ur
Q)
c1;i
0"8
~ :I:",
'",
Ii: 6;-<
~ E"C
.:::. 2@
..!:l
..
S ~
l;!
t
~
.~
" II
~
6 ""
"" ""
'" :::
"" ~
~ 0.
... ~
S!
... ~