Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS Meeting Date: File No Location Owner" Project: Variance Request: DEV~LOPMENTSERVICESDEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM # 00-140 Staff Report Planmng and Development Board and CIty ComrmssIOn May 23, 2000 ZNCV 00-002 - Front yard setback from property line ZNCV 00-003 - Rear yard setback from property lme Lot 8, SubdIvIsIOn Las Palmas Landmg Donald Tracey BUIldmg a new smgle-faxmly house on an Irregularly- shaped lot bounded on the east by Intracoastal Waterway Request for two (2) varIances from the CIty of Boynton Beach Land Development RegulatIOns, Chapter 2, Zomng, SectIOn 5 C.2.a to allow a ten (10) foot reductIOn from the twenty-five (25) foot front yard setback reqUIred wIthm the R-1-A smg1e faxmly zomng dIstnct, to allow a 15 foot front setback; and 2) to allow a fifteen (15) foot reductIon from the mmImum of twenty-five (25) foot rear yard setback reqUIred wIthm the R-1-A smgle farmly zomng dIstnct, to allow a 10 foot rear setback. BACKGROUND The subject property and nearby neIghborhood IS zoned R-1-A, smgle faxmly reSIdentIal (see ExhibIt "A", LocatIOn Map) The Irregularly- shaped, 0 44-acre (19,166 square foot) lot IS vacant and confomnng wIth the R-1-AA zomng dIstnct reqUIrements. The lot's eastern SIde, ItS most narrow at 60 feet, IS bounded by the Intracoastal Waterway The lots adjacent to the subject property are bUIlt out With smgle famIly homes. There IS a pnvate nght-of-way easement, LakesIde Harbor Road, extendmg along the northern property border, WIth an automobIle turn- around easement at the north west comer of the property A 25-foot utIlIty easement extends along the western property lme The property was re-platted m June of 1988, the plat shows setbacks of 25 feet from east and west property lmes, and 10-foot setbacks from north and south property lInes (see Exhibit "B", Page 2 Donald Tracey File No ZNCV 00-002 Plat) These setbacks are consIstent WIth the reqUIred setbacks on lots 7 and 6 of the same subdIvIsIOn, but WhICh are onented to front on a dIfferent street (PresIdential Dnve) Staff surveyed the area and It was observed that all propertIes along LakesIde Harbor Road front the nght-of-way, With an average front yard setback of25 feet. The lot to the south of the subject property has been developed wIth a 10 foot sIde setback from the abuttmg property Ime, It IS frontmg PreSIdential Dnve at ItS south-west comer ANALYSIS The code states that the zomng code vanance can not be approved unless the board finds the followmg a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning district b That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant c. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district d That literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. e That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure f. That the grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this chapter [ordinance] and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare (ExhibIt "D" contams the applIcant's response to the above cntena.) The development of the subject property wIth front on entatIOn toward LakeSIde Harbor Road IS conSIstent, as noted, WIth onentatIOn of all other propertIes along thIS road. Northern (or eastern) onentatIOn would also work well for "opemng" the home to the Intracoastal Waterway However, the Irregular, narrow shape of the lot Impedes such development If subject to the mmImum 25 feet front- and rear setback reqUIrements. In thIS case, the home would have to be re-desIgned and placed farther from the water, consequently lImItmg the water VIew/exposure Page 3 Donald Tracey File No ZNCV 00-002 (see ExhibIt "C", Survey) If the subject lot dId not have Intracoastal Waterway frontage, the restnctIOn would not have been sIgmficant; under the cIrcumstances It prevents the applIcant from fully utIlIzmg the lot's waterfront locatIOn and thus can be consIdered a hardshIp, based on a companson With the other lots m thIS plat. Moreover, placmg the bUIldmg farther away from the Intracoastal Waterway (eastern property lme) would be mconsIstent WIth bUIldmg placements on the remammg waterfront lots of the subdIvlSlon. These propertIes front PreSIdentIal Dnve (extensIOn of Las Palmas) and have the conformmg 25 foot front-and rear setbacks and 10 foot sIde setbacks. In turn, the requested 15 foot rear setback vanance would YIeld a rear setback of 10 feet, correspondmg to the 10 foot sIde setback of the adjacent property to the south. It prOVIdes for conSIstency m placement of the subdIvlSlon's waterfront propertIes and would have lIttle detnmentalImpact on the surroundmg area. CONCLUSIONSIRECOMMENDATION In summary, the followmg factors should be conSIdered. . The umque locatIOn and Irregular shape of the parcel, . The need for conSIstency ofthe development ofthe subject property With umt placement/onentatIOn on other propertIes along LakeSIde Harbor Road, and . The need for conSIstency WIth development patterns wIthm the subject plat (along the Intracoastal Waterway) The proposed placement of the bUIldmg IS conSIstent WIth the frontage of the remammg propertIes along LakeSIde Harbor Road. Staff recogmzes lImItatIOns of development/desIgn alternatIves of the subject lot. Even though the parcel's SIze IS relatIvely large compared to some other lots m the neIghborhood, ItS Irregular shape, m partIcular a narrow waterfront border, constItutes a sIgmficant deSIgn challenge to maxImIzmg the value of the property's pnncIpal asset, ItS Intracoastal Waterway locatIOn. Therefore, staff IS m partial support of the varIance requests. It is recommended that the variance request to allow a fifteen (15) foot reduction from the twenty five (25) foot minimum rear yard setback requirement be approved. A resultmg 10 foot rear setback would be conSIstent WIth the 10 foot SIde setback of the property to the south and, together WIth the proposed 25 foot SIde setback from the Intracoastal property lme, conSIstent WIth development patterns of other adjacent parcels along the Intracoastal Waterway However, it is recommended that, instead of a ten (10) foot reduction from the twenty five (25) foot minimum.lr.s21:11.- yard setback requirement, the applicant be granted a five (5) foot reduction to allow a twenty (20) foot front yard setback. Page 4 Donald Tracey File No ZNCV 00-002 The resultmg 20 foot front setback. . Would allow the applIcant the reasonable maxImIzatIOn of the waterfront value of the property, allowmg for the constructIOn of a home wIth a value proportIOnate to the hIgh value of the Intracoastal Waterway-frontmg parcel, and . Would mImmIze the detnmental effect of the reduced setback on propertIes along the LakesIde Harbor Road, and mmImIze possible VIew obstructIOn to the water The varIances would allow for the development of a more valuable property that would mcrease the CIty'S stock of hIgh-end smgle farmly housmg, whIch contributes sIgmficantly to the tax base. In summary, staff recommends that the request for a rear setback vanance of 15 feet be approved, and, that the request for a front setback varIance of 10 feet be demed. AlternatIvely, staff recommends that a front setback varIance of 5 feet, or a 20 foot front setback be approved. ThIS 5 foot varIance would prevent possible negatIve effects on adjacent propertIes, and would better represent "the mmImum vanance that WIll make possible the reasonable use of the land, bUIldmg or structure" No condItIOns of approval are recommended, however, any condItIOns reqUIred by the Board and CommIssIOn WIll be placed m ExhibIt "E" MR/hm \\CH\MAIN\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Don Tracey Variance\STAFF REP setbacks Tracey.doc o ,'T I.) :1 ~ --- t TI\. 4.~ CO.... . 'J~ ~ +a' } ~ 3~ S. ~ 10 ~ ,I~ ~I ~E~ ~ ~"13 ~ ~ ~ a31~ ~ I :t; >- 0 " ~ ' , . 0,... -::= ..-- 33 · ; ~ ~~ 1'1 ~.I ~ Ill!'~" ~'lJ: fJ ~I ----' 0 ..AKE I"J t . --- 'C r::: ' Ifl '< '. ~ ~ ;.. ~ I \J'" ~ z .. l' 10 'I ' Q: ~ ~ ~ ~', j Q: J La::. / '--- ......-. t ~ 1 U ---:--;,~ -; ~ :z: k>l' riA. A "" ~ ^J~ fA" ^ ~ J ~ P ,~LJW 1/71 llL ~~ ~. t; ,- ~, T 9"!lh ~,0:26- ~~\ %: <83 0 21) ). ____ '3, " aN,~)'O'2.~ \o')'i 0 / ~ . ~ ~ ~5~ i -:. 9)V9~'~~"'SITE ~ "~ ~. '.\ 03-:)-3.4 v~~~ ~ ~ ~q ~i / . ~~ ~., ~Lf . [0;)'} ~ I ;LA~ P~L..l.S~ .....I~~ ,'} A5;PA~~A~ ~ f 'i ~1 I I I ~ 1 J "' I. ,~~l tU 6 ~~~ NG4 ,j iC3 \.~ FAHr PALM AS ,,' /o~ "..: ...., 1--: N E-22nd ei -AVE-~~ ' f ; f;/~S < ~~ l'~ (2~ _ 2~'2) 60' I~' ~ :;(~(~_1IO~~~3)~ r";&:-- -I- :;; 1,-!!3 0-5,II i fL . ,a"" ~ .,'..:1..' d I. "l'" I I4J - ~ .I; ~ ';\ i &( 12 - ) ~~,! ;.) II.. <0 € - 0 ~ C 3-- n '-__ __~ I.U , I '" /I NOHfH slm ~ ~ ~'Y ~ CONDO o~~ ~9I L I REC 03-0]) ~-O-~9SAM BRt ^ N' JR'S HYP-OLUXO~ ; R3~~~ ~H~ft ~f)N (1- 81 j'" ~~I It) . :_:': -; 2Z- I I [.R",STI18 ~1'TffiED~ @ ~ \..27.~~1.~J~~7~ ~3'O-277) I , /p--, ~ 53 ~DD ~7'6~70)b: 1"()3 0 20 ~ 2. { ~3'O. '-.::.:: -;./ '" I ~\I'''......f\...II.\)[' ,...-~ ~-O-.0 -1. 1 ...'...., 10, 1 ~~. : ~S- II f ~ / ~0~-0-1I2) I y, I? ~ REC LOCATION MAP ~ t ~N 12:~ .. 0::1 I~ L.l ~ .;;J, ' ~ 4 ~ ). ! .;, ~ ; t- \ ~ ..J..~_ I I AVE R .. '" ,CROS~ G..s 0 ~ 11 'J t ~ I'J ~ BOYN . O,~ BACH C NOOS 0' -.2.- :l.c b -- ""l~ , '.,.. :.' 11 ~ $',B "'f!'I.p,' I~ .:; . ~ o 11 :) ) o 298 - EXHIBIT A . I - , I - 2-5 2-b -. CI) f R3 .. 'HULtfu SUS"n' , (2 - 17) ..... . ~ ,... ~ :ii: ~'" : "I.... tAL ,~. ,..' .,c.- I , -:-.-.., .. .., lIln I DI CK RD 4. ~ ,i,' ,. ' ~ ) ~~ * II.. fjtt:(i .3" 't PO TT R ~... .... '. " ..... .... ~, w ~ cs: ... "Go .J RD T .,.., " III .. .,,,' ,,; ." I /--in- ..t' :lI lNL1'-r HARBOR ~E CCL'UB CONDO R3 , rif: L1 ~ f-I GOV LOT Z €-o~ ~ ~ (" T n :0 r- - co - .' ~ LU c - ~ ...J 0- \./:) ..... c:: 0 I- 0 ~ ~ "" VI '- ":; - -,'- - "0<0 c::.c& oJ ;:j ., oV'Jo.. ,ijo- y E::lltl C':I-o.. VlO~ C. >- == 00 ..... z ~fi j jl U La r '": IB.""" .0000 ~ .,... \ 7:-1:- _~ 0 N 0 lot. 0 _.; I ~ ( lU<lW~l13 hlml{1 . g 11 3 ~OOO~~OI N ~ o .c ~ ~ 'a' ~ ~ ,- t1 ~ ..:3 s:Ij;,.~?.,.;; 38."t. !I .00.00.00 N 1171111 --'1 ~ I ~,~ c~ ~,f' l~ a~ ,.~. ~~ .....: ... <:':I c:: N Q..o~ ._ N ~ .:: ~ E > ., ._ 0.. <;"Oif\ Q.. .D N VI .;S a:l .J 0.. I ~ I:S a - I::S 0.. , r ~ -- ;.:] ~ _._-~ c: o ,-,,0 00 CT\ C"t"l""' _ 0- 00 :z Vl VI ..:3 -..... Q) '- '> - -,-- - '0<0 c:: ..c d) ~ ;:j ~ oV'lo.. ~ 0- ..... X E='.I:l <:':1-0.. 1/)0- C. > hl l-lJ t-. \. ~ 'X:l -:r-.. -...... '-1\ -- "'~I- :::!::a~ KeSlP~ !-- 'L4!fC III .... ~~~_. Cl:l " ~ C ;;; :; is Cl:l ::a '" ~ ::a .... ~ ~ ..;;! ct: ~ .., i ~ ~ ..... <) I.t. "- ID oq ::E ~ "'l '" BRUCE CAR--ER a ASSOCIA I ESt INC. BII1IIII LAND SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS EXHIBIT C C 4015 S.E 6th AVE (SOUTH FED(RAL HIGHWAY) PHONE ("~/) 265-1910 1111111 DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA 334 83 BOUNDARY SKETCH OF SURVEY FOR Don Tracy ~. .... 1..... a.II.'. UY. I- :::::::: -- -..... .... .- ..- :a";""...--...... ...-.......""'...... _'K -... .......,.... :::::' --- :::.1.... 1ft 01' ::::-:InIoMf ..,Uft__ :::" -. ......... ---..... 0.... .T -.- ...... ... "' '- ...... J...... N. ~:- ~~'_..~ ~::: u.w ........... _ 10 C&UWI.A,.. ...... <1'........... ....,.._..... ..... ..... to -. ... n.. n_ .... _. '....,._....- .... :::-....... ~...". ~='~:.":::- :;::" .__ InUI .... ~....- n... ........... I. "'..............- 10 ..."- ..... :=:'= .,. SCALE 30 N 50/)j(Ce Dj'1 U-233 "'i;au,......../ sy$re"" SAM BROWN JR S HYPOLUXO SUBOIVISION ( 1/811 ~ C ....: ~ - r ~f;~.) 1,1 ,t -~.~ f.i<-:---.-+--- _ _ _ oiL:...-- ---,--;--' '" r I I$~ I: ~ i I e-X oJ' l- II Z I ~~ ~ I I ~ ,;\_____J7~8/ <0 . I wOod doc. . . '$ '-------1 / - ,0 PL Ar LIMlrs \U '" ... .) N 89059 '00" C 1600/11 011 188 ..t:;.!!' ROAO. EASEMENr ~-L"_~ , !\ I~ \ r---i j '( z 5 I ~",_1'e~CIC. - \ -- , 5~ __ I \.OltlG -- e~1 __ I I ~ -- to I~ 1 ..-" Z2." ~J-, -;-~ -/6,- --.." .--- ~- --- ~'II ......--- a Z "; PASt) 5 1 (~&fr,tI,.J ~ 'U:. o ~ (, i I '" : r[ i () i I J i , f 1..1 -" -'f~ ..; ::J ':.J. ~ ... ~tA ~ o;L t. < o ~ r-~u I.. ~LJ c a I:) C> ~ 1 l' o \. fV,~/G /"I ,uP DESCRIPTION Lot 8, LAS PALMAS LANDING according to the Plat thereof on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, recorded in Plat Book 60 Pages 12 and 13 Said lands ~ituate lying and being in Palm Beach County Florida CERTIFICATE I hereby CERTIFY that the attached sketch of survey of the above described property Is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief as surveyed under my direction in April 12, 2000 t!. ,,4 "" BRUCE N CARTEl', REGISTERED LAND SUI\'IE (OH W) 2 Q b J STATE OF FLORIDA L H #:4683 f'.f"; ",,",,,,',..k. I.. ,..... _.......n.........' 0"'" .~- ,... 1-21-1995 13 16PM FROM P 2 EXHIBIT D ZO~.H"l0 CO~E' \A.fU^t.JC.( ApPL'c..A'IO~ ~.HA..,,",~ ~c..EY (S"0 1o,~ "!>1l..3 ____5. A) .._.__1 T ,~ A PE.c.._~i...l1\&..-LoT - .J T.. ,s ^ tJ ODe> 5t\~PED (BE') LOT. ~e:. IS A.__ _Y~YATE: f2..CAD (LA\(e-SlPE. r\^R.~~~"\c..\-\ .' ._. is C.OtJS'~~~.E:1> "-HE. f~ot..lt.~9E R..o^-t>,._.Jt,~_. l,.QT WOlJLf> lYPlCAlJ-..L & Q~___A GUL- 1>s - SAc.... e^TrtE~ '-t1~N~ ~O^~_..WJ:tJLH , JUS,.. ~~t.lJ~^1'E~ ^tJD OrfE~~ ^ 10~.: l\~.wNr/ f~SE MEN..~ J!jt.~€. foeE :C_~.~'t ______. ._______R€QIJ€"s..tINb.--J]€. V^~ ~N.c.e~ \Mti\<-rt WOLJLt>___ __~__,A_l:_LC\.V IHE: ~US~~liO~ O~ ~V __.t\OIV\E '\0 ,~e: ,oel~~T^TE1> \lJ_ $\XJi_^ t~~)ilO"'.t_...__. .___ ._._.. ~A."'" ~Lt> BE:. c..0t..1'$.IS.T^~7 WrrrL.Jt\E H~ME.c;.. ON ~l-rne:~ <>1J>-.E-_.QL~.~_-'e"Or, ...'___ ~_1t-\ E ~PEc..\^L c.ot..1t>\"\\o"-lS AMI> c...\R.c...ur'V\ ~\^J....l<:"'~ 'Do ~O.,.. ~>u~T__~wt my A C-rIOtJ. s. ._G'2J~Y Ge^~-n~u _.I'T """ILL NOT P~\VI LE e:,e:. IFtlS V~&\^uc.e: ~E~'yesT .___._ ~fJE~~~NY SP~c.t^L.. ...___. _...,..... -----------,........-. 1-21- 995 10 16P~1 >="ROr-.l _D') ::c R.E: ^ ~~ ~_~ :I: W lH) Lt;? B E_~"E"?Ft.l vEt? Of RL?'?Ij-r:.s. ~Pt~"'l~~"=:L_..E:-"~t~OYEC> ~y o TI-lfE:-__ ~Q.~.~~T t ES_ _.. E:) It=t e~^ ~J,-1-_Nc.. ~___. R~.9u~:?- T_.J S. .Ttl c: rYlt~' MvM.. V^F-\~~~€:. Tt\.~I. W_U.~~..___..~^~~... YOSS!~.._~l~.___Rt1\~~^~~E:...._.\Js~.._. or '1tl~ ~_~~_"._h._.' P 3 EXHIBIT D () 1t\_~ ~~It~l ~.__Qf ...:TItC ._V^-f!...!~_~ {..~ WtU- ~QT iSe....... \ t-J Ju~.tQ\Js QT2.. \>~TR.U~~.~TA~. 'Ie (flc AttEA. Og_._ -nl.~._rt.~4..c- ~_~L..f~.R-€ EXHIBIT "E" CondItIons of Approval Project name' DON TRACY (Front Setback) File number ZNCV 00-002 Reference' Application received April 17, 2000 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments NONE X UTILITIES Comments. NONE X FIRE Comments. NONE X POLICE Comments. NONE X ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments. NONE X BUILDING DIVISION Comments. NONE X PARKS AND RECREATION Comments. NONE X FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments. NONE X PLANNING AND ZONING Comments. 1 Requested variance shall be for 5 feet, or a 20 foot front setback. X ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 2. NONE X ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 3 To be determmed. J:\SHRDATAIPlanningISHAREDlWP\PROlECTSlDon Tracey Vanance\COND OF APPROV AL-fron. setback,doc