Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE 10/04 99 MO~ 13 34 FAX 561 6~6 8863 MFT DeTelopment Ine III 001/002 Olla11tlln1 ~]I..! ~ 11,\ I""" r OCT -.1 ). \~'I' . I-;'~rtt~ '!!"l~!.t. h~~.;~. " . w~;:'~uite 101, W~t ~~,~~fi~~~!"~' otida 33401 ~.,~ '[L"" Phone (561) 686-6959 Fax 68' ~':,' :~~, I ., .'- i:~N:~ :!,;,;,:}~;;1:,: FACSIMTI..E I-~ ',I. - r '...., ..' ER. /y~- tO~ ~ ~ 'p~ -~\r l Tom McGillicuddy /t!J- ij-9?J , NUMBER OF PAGES. 2-Witb.;'cover r ....1"':. CjVA>-7U-x CO,..? (;hul< - JoT '2-7- ~ f~ TO-- j oJ)@ff - ~/J.;'t3;V1 c. F !,,"~)' ~~~~C~(U' /J-rA~ ~ tL~;:~ ;!!!l';t. .~. ( ~~. . ". ~fJ/J"~ - r:(fJ:i~'~ ': . ,~~ I .',. ~\,j~~;~~~t;:~;, . n.;I'"'_Wr~~~"1J' , - ...~1!;~ a'y .%~ 'I ~i~~. "tr - ~/AJ ;4vv~ (}J):,. rHJ~?,..~o.J ~~1 @10 N 1401 FOnl1lt Way, Suite tei . WClt P:l!m Beach. FL 33~Ol . (561) 7~O'2447 flu;; ($61 (,8(,'88(,) lO/04i99 MO~ 13 35 FAX 561 686 8863 MFT Development Ine ~002 002 Architectural Review Committee Quantum Park Properly Ownel'$' Association, Inc. 7407 Forum Way Suite J07 West Palm Beach, Ft 33401 PH 56'-686-6959 . FAX 56J-686-8863 October 4, 1 999 Mr Thomas Mongold George G Gentile & Associates 668 Mariners Way Boynton Beach. Fl 33435 Subject. Lot 22 - MasonIc Lodge - .236 "ans Ard1lfec:turalltevlew Committee Comments Deer Mr Mongold. fhe Archltecturol Committee took. octiOfl on the submitted site plan and supporting documents at the meetJrlg held on September 27 1999 The Committee decided to approve the proposed development subjec:t to the submlMal of revised and addltlonol documents to address the comments of ihe Commiitee. Addltlonol documents requested ore as follows: 1 Boundary Survey 2. TOpoQrophic Survey 3. Traffic Statement 4. Flora and Fauna Survey of the site 5. Roof tOp mechanical plan ensuring equipment Is adequotely screened 6. Co:or elevation mustratlng svfflclent color controst on exterior walls. 7 Show that down spouts for roof drainage are not visible from roodway An existing drolnage pipeline Is shown on the site pIOn connecting an existing unauthoriZed out~ foil to the Lake Worth Drainage District Conal with the drc:lncge Inlet In Quantum Blvd. We are aware of the outfall pipe and a stub from the drainoge inlet in tM roadway to Lot 22, but we are not aware of the cormectlng pipeline. If the pipeline aoes exist, it must be removed as port of the site development. If the pipeline does "lOt exist. cleose revise the site plan and conceptual drainage pion accordIngly Please address the buildIng maIn entrCl1ce doors swing!ng Into ~he driveway under the port-o- coche. Please provide the additional documents requested ond any revised Clans in cdvcnce of the scheduled subseQuent architectural review committee meeting to consIder the proposed developmen~ /1P ~ I . {,_.- R' I -_..._~. lr1tou, A.R.C. Department of Engineering and Public Works PO. Box 21229 West Palm Beach. FL 33416-1229 (561) 684-4000 wWW.co palm-beach.fLus . Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Maude Ford Lee. Chair Warren H. Newell. Vice Chairman Karen T Marcus Carol A. Roberts Mary McCarty Burt Aaronson Tony Masilotti County Administrator Robert Weisman An Equal Opportuniry Affirmative Action Employer" @ printed on recycled paper September 27,1999 OCT - .4 1999 Mrs. Hanna Matras City of Boynton Beach Plannmg and Zoning Department 100 East Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 . ~--=-,......~-'""-,-- , RE QUANTUM PARK - LOT 5ID: MASONIC LODGE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Mrs Matras The Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISion has reviewed the traffic statement (dated August 20, 1999) for the project entitled Quantum Park - Lot 51D: Masomc Lodge pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards m Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code The project is summarIZed as follows. LocatIOn. High Ridge Road, south of Gateway Boulevard Mumcipahty' Boynton Beach Proposed Use Fraternal Lodge (6,829 sf) New Trips: 264 tripS per day Buildout: 2000 This is a portion of a previously approved project (Quantum Corporate Park). Currently this site is vested for the following uses: Office Park (1 685,772 sf); General Commercial Retail (426,888 sf); and General Industries, Light (2,784,354 sf). Based on our review the Traffic DIVision has determmed that the project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County Please contact me If you have any questions regardmg this review Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Al Federi ,P E. Semor Traffic Engmeer cc: Andrea Troutman, P.E. Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. File: General TPS MUll TraffiC Study Review F \TRAFF1C\apf\tps\99129app.wpd TAZ 421 08/25/1999 15 35 561-~75-5250 GGG 8 ASSOCIATES - GEORGE G. GENTILr- " ASS 0 ( I ATE Sf I N C. LandtCc!l ps Archltect.t Flannsr6 and EnvlrOM1d1nta I eontU Itant6 PAGE 01 61& W. InC:u.ntown ~aCll 6ulte 2"1 Jupiter, f=lorfda 334&& &61.S'S.~SS' &61..&15-526" FAX PAO&IM I L.E Tf=C.ANeM f TT .AL- TO ~~ ~HEP COt\PANy,Q~~P'~ · ~ FAX' ~1-.l,Z~ RlOM DAre ~..ECTl ~ OP PAGeS INCLLOING CO'JER1 <:. COf'FloeNTlAL..ITY NOTICE n-e N"'ClAMATION CONTAN!!D IN THe,.ACSIMlU! ~A(z 18 LEGAL.LY PR'VLSZD /iIHJ OON-IDI!NTIAL II"PORMAT1ON. M1!NZ) 0fIL Y jII'(R 'n-e uee 01" n.e IN)tVICUAl.. CR I!!NTITY NAM!D AIlJOVf!. ,.. YOU AIle NOT 'TlC IN'fI!N)B) IECPIeNT. you ARE ~ NOTPII!D 1\.lAT AN'( OISSl!MNATI~ OIS"TVIl!UrtCN (R ~ era 'n-IS TBJ!!ClCPY IN AN( ~ IS 8'T1il1C'T'\. Y PR08T1!D. .. YOU ~~ ~IV!O 1WS Tr!..E<::X:JPY IN !RI2OIl. FllE!AE IM\t!!OlA1!I. Y ~ ~ AT <-40n C~7 P'~~~.. ~~ t).l~~ Q.~~. ~SSAGEt COPIES TOI~. "15 Ind,."town Read. Bulte 2"" · .)up I"'" . FlorTda . 3'~&& .Tel (&61) &1&-13&&1. Fa>t (&61) &'S-~26tt> 08/25/1999 15 35 551-575-5260 GGG & ASSOCIATES PAGE 02 - '......" .........n........ ..... _...__.I_,........~'.._I_.... GEORGE G. GENTILE & ,~;~c Af[; N( , LlI'lol5~ A :~"U"ts 'Philnn."5 '''''I~ E"~'rO,..I't",'n~.i Con,ui't..n~s cC-00001i1 GBroee c;. w<<tde. F~l.A '" Tl'O)'~.:y.^!>\)I EttlIly~"onty.A9V. August 25, 1m Mr Michael Rumpf Pt.,nning and Zoning Director City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, F133435 Re: Quantum Park PIO Boynton Masonic Lodge Justification for number of proposed parking .paces . Dear Mr RumRf: In your comments letter dated August 10, 1999 for the above referen~ project, comment .3S required us to provide par1<ing calcutatio~ based on the P.l D. parking requirements for Quantum Park of Commerce. The parking requirement for the P 1.0 state. tnat we should provide 1.112 parking apaces for every twc employe., on a maximum shift along with adequate visitor par1<iI')Q to .erve the needs of that particular ule Since the lodge cons.sts of a few pert~tlme employees with the majority of the users being lodge membel'8 which meet regularly twice a month w1ttI occasional special meetings, we feel that an altemative parking requirement be used to determine how many ,paces are deemed adequate for this use Our recent submittal proposed 64 parking spaces on the site Since we were going for a permitted use change within the P I. 0 to allow for meeting facilities for Fraternal lodge under the Office District, we used the parking requirements for "Office-Retail COmplexes" in the City's code of ordinances which requires 1 SP{iC8 per 200 S.F of gross leasable floor area. Using this requirement we were required to provide 34 spaces. At this time we would like to propose using the parking requirements for Clubs, Lodges and Fraternal OFlJanlZations whid"l requires 1 space per 1 00 S F The floor plan has designated approx. 4,500 S.F (two 56'X40' mee1ing rooms) of meeting space, which shall result in provldlng.45 apllceS on site. The remainder of the 6,829 S F building (Approx. 2,329 SF) will be used for ofri<;e space and other ancillary uses ,uch aa bathrooms, storage and reception ar... For this remaining space we are proposing to use the parking requirement for Office which requires 1 space per 200 S.F resufting in providing 12 more spaces totaling 57 required spaces The proposed site plan has provided 64 spaces which exceeds this I'1tqtli,..ment by 7 spaces. I 075 w~i~~~;;;;:~ ~~ Suite; 201 Jl'I"~' F '<ori... .:l~451' ~'-~7S-Sl5~7 f ~1'57~-526C FA1 o\IWw."'~C,,,,,'Md1ltoo:Ct5",,,, tJ , , DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of PlannIng and Zoning Building Planning & Zoning Engineering Occupational license Community Redevelopment August 24, 1999 Mr AI Federico, Senior Traffic Engineer Palm Beach County Traffic Division Department of Engineering and Public Works POBox 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416 Re Traffic Study' Boynton Masonic Lodge - Lot 22 Quantum Park File # NWSP 99-018 Dear Mr Federico The enclosed traffic generation statement on the Boynton Masonic Lodge site, prepared by George G Gentile received by Planning and Zoning recently for the above-referenced application Please review the enclosed information for conformance with the County's Traffic Performance Standard Ordinance, and provide Michael Haag Building Code Permit Administrator, and I with your written response If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6260 Sincerely, 'fA ,- ~ --""? /v~/ ""= Michael W Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning MWR.ja l:\SHRDA T A\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\PROlECTS\BOYNTON MASONIC LODGE -NWSPlTRAFFlC MEMO FORM LETTER. DOC America's Gateway to the Gulfstream 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX. (561) 375-6259 GEORGE G GENTILE Ge"'C'~e G CJ:::"'t:.e. ~ASL,~ ~/"T ""cl:r:;a\.. :..,sLf. E:1" Cl...,a.....::...-,e' ,';s ,4 'er n' ~t~ Lr OC ._~- August 24, 1999 Mr Michael Rumpf Plannning and Zoning Director City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FI 33435 Re Boynton Masonic Lodge Response to 1st Review Comments Dear Mr Rumpf" Please find attached 10 complete sets of revised drawings for the above referenced project. Also attached are copies of a signed and sealed survey, traffic statement and requested r~duction~ I' The following are our responses to the City's 1 st Review Comments PUBLIC WORKS Comments 1 The Public Works Department does not approve of the dumpster location in the attached site plan, as it requires the sanitation vehicle to back completely off the property We request that the dumpster be placed at the east end of the loading zone with a back up space to be placed in the original dumpster location allowing our vehicle to leave the property in a forward direction Response The dumpster has been re-Iocated to the North-West corner of the property which allows for the garbage trlJcks to use the access to the loading area as back-out area. UTILITIES Comments 2 All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements Canopy trees may be planted outside ot the easement so that roots and branches will not irrTpact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future LDR See 7 5-18 1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services either in utility easements or public rights-ot-way r~5 ~r p L. _ "'. J.. 52' 5-;;::;---3~::::P '::;C ~-;-:; S_o.::<:) ;::.......x ~-1~ a~;:e-a;c e_ Response Utility easements are shown for the fire hydrants. 3 Oept. of Health permits may be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project. (Sec 26-12) The need for a permit cannot be determined until water and sewer lines are shown on the plans Response The question of permit requirements is acknowledged. . 4 Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g P m as stated in LOR chap 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see Sec. 26-16(a)) Please submit these calculations with your Health Department permit submittal Response Fire flow calculations will be provided with the Health Department Permit submittal 5 Sec. 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Oept. application forms or within 30 days of site plall approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand Response A capacity reservation fee will be provided with the request for signature on the Health Department application forms. 6 Comp Plan policy 13C 3 4 requires the conservation of potable water City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available Response The owner wHl make reservation for potable water for use in the structure A well will be dug to provide the source of water for the irrigation system 7 Water and sew~r lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec. 26-33(a) of the Code Response Proposed easements are shown for the main lines servicing the fire hydrants. These are the only anticipated easements. 8 This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy Response The water meter requirements have been noted 9 LOR chap 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire. hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition by showing all hydrants Response Proposed hydrants are shown on the plans. 10 Appropriate backflow preventers may be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with Sec. 26-207 Response Backflow pre venters will be provided as required. 11 A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) Response The review requirement for the building permit has been noted FIRE Comments 12 The overhang of the portico must be a minimum clearance of sixteen feet (16') Hydrants and mains must be designated on the site plan, LOR 6-16 We recammend that this plan not go forward without the water distribution plan approved by the Fire Rescue Department. Response The clearance for the overhang has been modified to 16' clearance POLICE Comments None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments 13 Show North Arrow on Site Plan Response A North arrow is shown on the Site Plan 14 Reverse lettering for Quantum Blvd - (all sheets) Response The lettering for Quantum Blvd has been reversed on all sheets. / 15 Consider incorporating the raised curbing as a wheel stop This allows you to have a 16' deep parking space and consequently two additional feet of landscape area throughout the site Correct parking stall detail accordingly Response All parking spaces have been changed tq reflect a 16' deep space with a 2' overhang (measured to the face of a 6" raised curb) 16 Correct dimensions on parking stall detail Response The dimensions have been corrected on the parking stall detail (See Site Plan) 17 Show all pavement striping, marking and signage on both the Site and Paving & Drainage Plans LOR Chapter 4 Section 7 B 1 e (Le stop bars, double yellow lane separation stripes at driveway locations, etc) Response Pavement striping, marking and signage will be noted on the Site & Paving & Drainage Plans. 18 On the Site Plan add a note that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application These permits include, but are not limited to the following. site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation Permits required from other permitting agencies, such as FOOT, PBC, SFWMD, DERM LWDD DEP and any others, shall be included with the permit request. Response A note has been added to the Site Plan (See Revised Site Plan) . 19 Add stop bars and signs at the following locations at the exit from the northeast parking lot, at the end of the on~ way drop-off lane and at the southeast driveway (on both the Site Plan and Drainage Plan) [LDR Chapter 23, Article II B ] Response Stop bars and signs have been added at the noted locations. 20 Provide a recent (6 months or less) survey complying with LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.A. Response Please find attached, copies of a recent signed and sealed survey 21 Modify the Site Plan General Note to read that all striping markings and signage shall conform to City Standard Drawing B-98001 Response This note has been added to the Site Plan in the 'General Notes' 22 Show an accessible route from the public sidewalk to the building if there is a pedestrian path abutting your site If not, obtain an exception by the Building Official per Florida Accessibility Code 4 1 1 (5) Response There is no existing sidewalk along Quantum Blvd, therefore we are not proposing an accessible route or sidewalk form the R. 0 W BUILDING DIVISION Comments 23 Add to the building that is depicted on the site plan drawing (SP-1) a labeled symbol that represents the location of the handicap accessible entrance door to the building. Show and label the same door on the floor plan drawing Identify the number of drawing that represents the floor plan and elevation view drawings Response The handicap entrance to the building has been noted on the site plan and floor plans. ! ~ 24 Add to the site plan drawing a labeled symbol that represents and shows the location and path of the accessible route that is required between the accessible parkinQ spaces and the accessible entrance door to the building Add text that would indicate the label represents the accessible route and the route is in compliance with Section 4 3 (Accessible Route) and 4 6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones) of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Please note that at time of permit review the applicant shall provide detailed data on the plans that will verify that path of the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Response The accessible route from handicap parking spaces has been noted on the site plan and a note has been added 25 Identify the finish floor elevation within the footprint of the bui'lding that is illustrated on the site plan drawing and the floor plan drawing Add to the site data, found on sheet SP-1, the flood zone tl'lat the bui~lding is located within including, where applicable, base flood elevation If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans Add specifications, notes and computations to the site data that will verify the proposed finish floor elevation is in compliance with the minimum standards of the following a) Minimum elevation required py the flood zone b) Minimum elevation required by the South Florida Water Man,agement District permit for the project. c) Show and provide computations that verify the elevation of the finish floor is ~ix inches or more above the crown of the abutting right(s)-of-way Response The finish floor elevation will be 14 75', above the minimum fin floor elevation of 14 5' as established in the SFWMD permit. The building is located in flood zone A-5 that has a base flood elevation of 11 0' The floor is also 18" above the crown of the abutting right-of-way 26 Provide detailed and dimensioned elevation view drawings' of the site signage including dimensioning the width and height of the sign and the overall height of the si91"! structure Add computations to the drawing that verify the total sign area is in compliance with the regulations specified in the Sign Code All1end the general note found on sheet SP-1 that describes the free standing sign to include text that would require the sign to comply with the specifications of the approved Quantum Park sign program Delineate on the landscape pi all the location of the landscaping that is required for site signage Drawings of the signage shall comply with the applicable regulations specified in the Sign Code (Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations) Response A sign detail has been added to 'the site plan (SP-1) and it complies with the Quantum Park of Commerce's Signage Plan The landscaping has been delineated that is required for the site signage 27 Provide detailed and dimensioned elevation view drawings of the building signage On the elevation view drawings of the building, identify the location of the wall signage and dimension the length and height of the signage Also, identify the total sign area and provide computations that verify the sign area is in compliance with the Sign Code Drawings of the signage shall comply with the applicable regulatLons specified in the Sign Code (Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations) Or .. Place the following note on the site plan and building elevation view drawing "Building signage is not approved for this project. Separate site- plan review and approval is required for building signage " Response The Masonic logo has been located on the elevation drawings. Tf:Jis logo will match what has been depicted on the freestanding sign detail 28 Add a note to the siteiplan indicating that the site lighting fixtures will illuminate the site consistent with the specifications identified in the Parking Lot Code Omit the pole lighting photometric information and drawing. This information is required at time of permit submittal, not at site plan review Response This note has been added to the site plan (SP-1) 29 On site plan drawing, identify the symbol that represents the property line Response The property line has been noted on the site plan (SP-1) 30 At time of 2nd review, submit a current survey of the subject property Add to the site plan all easements that are shown on the survey The type and size of the easement shall be shown and identified on the site plan Where applicable, amend the plans so that structures do not en...croach into an easement. Response A current survey has been made a part of this submittal (See attached). 31 Below the drawing titled FI00r Plan, add text that would indicate that the layout of the floor plan is conceptual Response Floor plan has been noted as "Conceptual" PARKS AND RECREATION Comments None FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments '32 The applicant should indicate on the landscape plans if any of the existing native trees will be preserved, relocated or removed and replaced on the site Response All existing trees that are to remain or be re-Iocated have been noted on the landscape plan There are nine Live Oaks located in the R. 0 W which will remain or be re- located due to conflicts with proposed driveways. There are also five Royal Palms which are currently located in the Southwest corner of the subject property These tree will be re- located throughout the site ' PLANNING AND ZONING Comments 33 Sign and seal all drawings prior to building permit submittal Response AIf drawings will be signed and sealed at time of building permit submittal 34 Provide a signed and sealed survey Ch 4 Sec.7 Par.A Response A signed and sealed survey is being provided (See attached) 35 On the site plan provide the following information Ch 4, Sec.7 Par B A location designated as a turn around area at the parking lot terminus for unloading vehicles, garbage truck and cars Accessible walk from the building entrance to the Quantum Blvd. Siqewalk. Ch.9 Sec 10 Par B Proposed sign plan including all wall sign sizes and 'locations Show wheel stops in all stalls preventing vehicle overhang onto adjacent walkways less than 6' in width Also locate them in the parking detail on sheet SP-1 Handicapped accessible route from all accessible parking spaces to the main building entry, separate from vehicular access ways Ch 9 Sec.1 0 Par B Loading area screen buffering Ch 9 Sec.1 0 Par C Parking calculations based on the PID parking requirements Ch.2 Sec 7 Par H2 I Surrounding lot land uses and descriptions Response Above comments have been addressed and are noted on the site plan/landscape plan and in previous comments. 36 Submit colored elevation drawings of all elevations of the building Ch 4 Sec.7 Par D.2 Response A color elevation has been submitted to the Planning Dept. at the initial submittal 37 To provide enhancement to plain walls without openings or windows the use of Alexandra palm should extend along the sides of the building Break the continuity of sandankwa viburnum with Alexandra palms for every 25 feet. Response Alexander Palms have been incorporated along the two sides of the building spaced 25' 0 c 38 On the landscape plans provide the following information Ch 7 5, Art.ll, Sec.5 Type and coverage of irrigation system Loading area screen buffering Ch 9 Sec.1 0 Par C Response The above information has been noted on the Landscape Plans. 39. On the Architecture plans provide the following information Ch 4 Sec.7 Par D Tabular information including paint colors-and construction materials Full dimensions on all elevation drawings Response Information has been added to architectural drawings. " 40 Obtain use approval for the subject use Response We have provided the City with a Use Approval Request along with the required application fee 41 Provide traffic generation data for cumulative traffic impact monitoring Response See attached traffic statement. 42 Proposed plans must be reviewed and approved by the Quantum Park Architectural Review entity Response Copies of the revised plans will be forwarded to the Quantum Park Architectural review committee for their approval We hope that these responses assist you and your staff with the review of this project. Please do not hesitate to ,call me at (561) 575-9557 should you have any questions l Jason Litterick Designer (LC 177) t GGG/ms PI"DER TROUTMflI1 CO"SULTI"G. I"c. Transportation Planners and Engmeers 2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H West Palm Beach, FL 33406 (561) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663 Email pindertroutman@msn.com August 20, 1999 Ms. Hanna Matras Planning and Zoning Division City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE. Quantum Park Boynton Masonic Lodge - Lot 22 - #PTC99-101 Dear Ms. Matras: It is proposed to develop a 6,829 SF club facility for the Boynton Masonic Lodge on Lot 51-D of Quantum Park in the City of Boynton Beach The site IS located on Quantum Boulevard east of the canal Access to the site IS via two (2) dnveway connections to Quantum Boulevard The proposed development is projected to generate 264 daily trips, 2 AM peak hour trips and 20 PM peak hour trips as shown on Attachment 1 Driveway volumes are provided on Attachment 2 The Quantum Park DRI is an approved project, and is considered a PrevIous Approval under Article 15, Traffic Performance Standards, of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code (ULDC) The proposed land use and intensity are within the limits of the original approval of the Quantum Park DRI, as shown on Attachment 3, therefore, the proposed project is not subject to the Traffic Performance Standards. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this letter, do not heSitate to contact this office. Sincer., . ~ ~' fi-,..e$.}tf - JUJ / ir g Z3~~ drea M. Troutman, PEr ~ Attachments cc: Albert Federico Tom Mangold Jason Littenck D'\PROJECT FILES\PT099-101\LffiERS Attachment 1 Quantum Park Boynton Masonic Lodge - Lot 22 Trip Generation #PTC99-101 8/23/99 tripgen Page 1 of 1 Daily land Use Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Lodge 6,829 SF 38 6 /1,000 SF 264 AM Peak Hour Total Trips land Use Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) In Out Total Lodge 6,829 SF o 324 /1,000 SF 1 1 2 PM Peak Hour Total Trips land Use Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) In Out Total Lodge 6,829 SF 2996/1,000 SF(67/33) 13 7 20 (1) 40% of Quality Restaurant trip generation rate per discussions with County staff PTC o o ! j i N.T.S. /~ / SITE i I I I \ ~ /: ~~ ~ ~~~ <Qo'\)'\: ~\'J~ Q\'JN ~ ~ 145 \ \ /~ / ..... ~~L I \ \ \ 1 (5) t I "'~ t 0 (1) LEGEND 1 - AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC (5) - PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC 145 - DAILY PROJECT TRAFFIC 8/23/99 QUANTUM PARK BOYNTON MASONIC LODGE - LOT 22 ATTACHMENT 2 PROJEG DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ffi] &\ ~ ~ ",90 N ~ .... 1"(iJ.~ ~ '" ""<70"'.........."''''''''''.........'''.....<70$':2. "'''':;;~~R:;:;8S\;:t''':O<70~-''' ~ N N~":-"" "'.: ... ... '" '" ~~~~~~~;~~~~~~~~~g~~ '; ~ N .~ c. cc. cc. 5 'ii\'ii\'ii\'ii\'ii\'ii\~\i;'ii\'iJ;~ .~ ,,~%_%_~_~.~.%,~.8_8_8,~- ~~~............"'.........:..:..:.....'" ~ ~~';.f:g~';.f~~~:g~~ ;:. ":'2"''''''''''';'''''''''''''; N ~u.-"'U-u...~ fftt/'l(f'JtrJrfllJ'J %88888 .;.;.;.;.;~ ~ c C u,..lJ-\o1-I-l-U- tnfJ')fJ)tntJ'> 888%% .;';';;~ ----- ------ ~~~~!;; d,.Ja.0J5d, cor--,....r--f'o."" 000\0'1:0\0'\0'\ ~1l5~..o~..o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"".",."."..., m.....ooo~"''''~~~N'''OO~~...~~ 8<~"'''''''...''''''~'''N...OOO~~N~~ ~ ~~~~~~g~~~~~~....~o~ v ",N '" "'~ N",N"''''''' ~ "3 <J .~ } a '& ~~ ~~1 --ccf'O E ~ ~o L-.... -~ i i ~ ::l ~ <tt.C1- <; " ~ J .,1 ; Q.} o ~ I~ .2l ~ 'a~~ ~t.E 1%] % ~ ".: ~ IOCf ~'=2~ IBlB ~ :3 '" ~ :3 z '6 ~s ~-' :l C ~ .~ ..~ ~ ~~ ~5 ~'C 5))\ ",,,, .. .... '" 8%08~~ ~~g~~ ... v ~ ~ -0 ~ t ~ "", _ s .~-E ~ g ~'S 1\ ~ s ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ \~ \ l€ a - '10 ." ~ <( ~u I~-"Q W 0 I9l.E-61~ Ii( ~I~<(,,-:E I ~ ~ i t. ~ ~ ~'c;, Q.. g ~ ; ~ E 1)1, ~ olll~ l ~ ~ ;\l ~\t,~~ft~]dO~~ o""...oe;oe;oe;U<70.o(a>D N::::';:;&'.~t.';.f"'~:;;:r. ~\f)_<coC5~ ~ ~~~':;t':;to: :3 ~_:t_ ~~~ ~f"') Q..Q..'Ct ~~ ~~ '< '< cO ~~t ':;t_~~ .i ~ ~ ~~ ~ '" ... '" .~ ee s""- ~8 ...'" '" '" '" .... N '" .-------- . Co u-u..-w.-lJ- ""t.f>V'J<J> 8888 ~;,;; ~- cc,....~,.... CO~NO'> ..;d. ~ ., 5 ~~%''ia ~~~ g, gl 0; ~ 0 Oil 9 <>. U ,. :l E.O- 8'" :l r-~~:a ~~\6~ N""CO~ l.f'\..n I/"l rO <>. a> ..... '" "" '" :5 Ie C u.. u.. '" ~'" %~8 .;cz,; <ii \ " % ?i a> '" ..... o ..... $ ~ <( $ --- r--,tJ";" ... .... . <70 . <70...<70 '" c (:!. ~ ~(;;~ ~ ... ..... '" '" ~ 00"" 0"'''' ",..."" d~a) ",a>'" ~:; 015 u -a..-l E ,~~?; ] 't~ c: ~~ [5 "X~ ,,'" ."i.S "'E-"'~ ~~a~"'~ al~'~ 13!\~ g~&gr;2 ~ to I'~ <Ii " ..... :l ~ 8 I%. ~ u.. '" 8, '" ~ '0 t- '" .xi '" <::> .... ~ ~ ~ '" <70 '" "" ..0 ~ '" '" ~ o '" "'. fA .... ~ <ii ~ 'E .;\i r. " " ~~= 'C.,'" <4 ~ 0 ...r-'" ~'" "'. ~",... J! \I \I .<4 13 ~ ~~~ \)0'"6 Q. 'w- u.- 0"'''' z~~ ~ ~~ =~ o~ ~u.. ",,,, ~~ .\ ~ 1)1, ~ "lEO .:go " u.. ~'" ~~ .... '" \I II ta~ .~ .~ -0-0 ~ .s 00 ~v; 8. g, '" '" -0 :3 " ~ ~ c ::J t lil t- o ... ~ ro~ 1)1,.;\ " " ~~ a;- Q;: ~; >->- ! " 1 '" o '~ 1 ~ '0 t- o ~ \,) '" !:!- 13- ... u..~ u.. ~* ",,,, '" DO> ",,,, ... ........ ... on ..... r-'l'""O\~Ln l=8\ig~ ~ ... '" 0_ "'. o ....... U ~ '" % -- ~ I D ~ ... -0 Ii; ~ ... " ;;- ...... :::::- u- "'u..'" ",,,,'" .....""'" r--.~ rSJ tI"I.. '" ",'" $..0"" ~ N r--.~ ",...", 8 .~ 3 <t ~t~O E-o>- E~ [5 -5 % '" .g .. w '" ~ c. .S ~ ~ '" " \ 't> ~ '" '" '" :.~ ii- ! 0 5 'u - 0 :J.. lI\ U if \~ ',;:1 '(0:1 ~ ! ~.~ li ~ ~ i ~ ~~~ E:.:e \i)~1 :! g~g .~~ ~~%i~~ ]~~~i'~ c: i~ % ~ ~ .g u.- ;.L. . 0 ~ ~ o;.n'-: ~ ~ c.. i"$8~"S E~~~~c :€:~~.g~ ~~~~~~ ~2-l!~'ije. ~ % 1.g ~~ .s::. .- N ~ : ~~g-%~'~ '" " ~ " ~ . i]o]~' ~~E~!E o 0:. '" '" ~ .. , ------- DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning Building Planning & Zoning Engin~ering Occupll1ional Lic~ns~ Community R~development July 20, 1999 George GentIle & Associates 675 W lndiantown Rd., SUIte 201 JupIter, Fl 33458 Re Boynton MasonIc Temple Project No NWSP-99-0l8 Dear Mr GentIle Your apphcatIOn for a new SIte plan, known as the MasOnIC Temple, has been accepted and is bemg processed. ApphcatIOn defiCienCIes have been noted and mclude utlhty plans, a traffic analYSIS showmg the cumulatIve traffic volumes for Quantum Park Planned lndustnal DIStnCt (includmg conformance With traffic performance standards), use approval, and verification of deSIgn review and approval by the Quantum Park AssociatIon. As discussed With you at the time of submIttal, use approval must be requested for tms uruque use. I have enclosed a copy of a prevIous use approval request for Quantum Park. A smrilar letter from you would represent the apphcatIOn to amend the hst of approved uses for the PID to mclude, for example, meetmg facIhtles for profeSSIOnal busmess, or fraternal orgamzatIons. The apphcatIOn fee for use approval IS $250 00 Please submIt the above-referenced Items to ensure the timely review of your proJect, and contact me when I can be of further assistance. Smcerely, ~ ,~ .....- ~ Michael W Rumpf DIrector of Plannmg and Zomng MWR/nl J .ISHRDA T A IPlanninglSHAREOI WP\CORRESPlMasonic.doc America's Gateway to the Gulfstream 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. BOl310 Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259 i) 12 /4 r'r . STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Helping Floridians create safe vibrant, sustainable communities" IEB BUSH Governor STEVEN M. SEIBERT Apnl 30, 1999 {DJ r~ ~ I nil ! !Lil I 3 - .--..; I I i I R n !~ " ", fLJ- Mr Michael Rumpf, Manager Planning and Zon1Og Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: ADA-I084-048. Quantum Park Development of Regional Impacts (DRI) Development Order Dear Mr Rumpf: The Department has reviewed the amended Development Order of the Quantum Park DR!, which was rendered by your office to the Department on March 18, 1999 The adopted modificatIOns consist of four land use changes. They 1Ovolve land use changes of several eXIst10g lots, and the additIon of a newly proposed "Amusement and RecreatIOn" land use deSIgnation 10 order to allow the constructIOn of a mOVIe theater The specific changes are as follow. . Redesignate Lot 2 "Office/Industrial/Commercial" from "Office/Industnal," . RedeSignate Lots 66, 67-A, and 67-C "Office/Industrial/Commercial" from "Office/Industnal/Hotel, " . Redesignate Lots 76, 81, and 82 "Office/Industnal/CommercIal" from "Office/Industnal/Hotel, " . Add a designatIOn of "Amusement and RecreatIOn" to Lots 83 through 88 to allow the construction ofa 20-screen movie theater complex. The total acreage of these lots is 22.50 acres. 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399 2100 Phone (850) 488 8466/Suncom 278 8466 FAX (850) 921 0781/Suncom 2910781 Internet address http //www state fl us/comaffl FLORIDA KEYS Area of Critical Stale Concern Field Office 279& Overseas Highway, Suite 212 Marathon, Florida 33050-2227 GREEN SWAMP Area of Critical State Concern Field Office 205 East Main Street, suile 104 Bartow, Florida 33830-4641 Mr Michael Rumpf Quantum Park DRI April 30, 1999 Page Two Pursuant to SectIon 380 06( 19)( e)5 .a., Flonda Statutes (F S ), the addItIOn of a newly adopted land use desIgnatIOn IS not presumed to be a substantial deviatIOn, Since the affected acreage represents less than 15% of the total DRI acreage. The size of the affected acreage IS 22.50 acres, which IS approXImately 4% of the existing DRI acreage. The applicant demonstrated that no addItional external tnps beyond those already approved by the Development Order would be generated. The Department does not belIeve thiS modificatIOn would create addItional regIOnal Impacts beyond those whIch have been prevIously reviewed by the Department. Pursuant to SectIOn 380 06(19)(e)3 , F S., the shifting of prevIOusly approved land use designatIOns WIthin the DRI IS presumed to create a substantial deviatIOn, Since the changes are not specIfied In paragraphs (b) and (c) of Section 38006(19), F S However, the applIcant has rebutted the presumption by demonstrating that the proposed changes would not lead to addItional external trIpS beyond those already approved by the Development Order Consequently, the Department will not appeal the amended Development Order of the Quantum Park DRI If you have any questions or require further assistance in thiS matter, please contact Talal M. Benothman, Planner IV, of my staff at (850) 487-4545 Sincerely, ~wf4 r Roger Wilburn Community Program Administrator Bureau of Local Planning RW/tmb cc Mr James Snyder, TCRPC Mr Eugene A. Gerlica, P .E. Mr Kahart M. Pinder, AICP