Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS 7 \. IwP In W ~ ~ . ~ \ - 6 \991 l~ L~\ \ I ....--.- 0 -.-- PL!>.NNING AN 7GN\N" D!:.Pl <1.-........,..-............-.-... CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH MEMORANDUM TO Dale Sugerman, City Manager fr' llk~ FROM. '/l Michael J Pawelczyk, Assistant City Attorney771t/ CarMax at Quantum Park CAt'-X' ,L( 0....-1-. RE DATE February 26, 1997 ISSUE Can CarMax build pursuant to humcane standards in effect at the time of site plan approval or must CarMax build according to standards m effect at the time of permltting? SHORT ANSWER. CarMax must comply with the Hurricane Standards of the Standard Building Code that are m effect at the time of permltting. FACTS On November 19, 1996, the site plan for CarMax at Quantum Park was approved by the City of Boynton Beach City COmmlssion. At that meetmg, the representative for the developer questioned the status of the pending LDR reVisions, and Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director mdicated that the premises could be constructed according to the LDR proviSIOns in effect at the time the site plan was approved. In the meantime, through information received from Actmg DITector of Development, AI Newbold, in October, 1996, the Humcane Standards as set forth m the Standard Building Code were amended effective January 1, 1997 On or about January 15, 1997, the developer attempts to obtam pefmlt(s), and the Development Department informs the developer that it must comply with the Standard Building Code, as It eXists at the time of permltting. On January 21, 1997, the amendments to the Land Development RegulatIons are adopted by the City of Boynton Beach. DISCUSSION Section 553 73, Flonda Statutes requITes each local government to adopt one of the State minimum building codes as its building code. ThIs code shall govern the construction, alteration, repair or demolition of any building for which the local government has building constructIon regulation responsibility The City of Boynton Beach has adopted the Standard Building Code, 1991 Edition, as amended from time to time. See Part III, Chapter 20, Article 1, Section 3 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Sections 553 79(2), Flonda Statutes further requITes that the City's Department of Development must be able to certify compliance With the Standard Building Code before a permlt IS Issued. As one can discern from eXaIDlmng the chronology above, the LDR reviSions were not adopted until after CarMax applied for the permit, and accordmgly, would not apply to CarMax. However, the amendments to the Standard Building Code regarding hurricane construction standards were not part of the LDR reViSions. The City, through Ordinance 96-40, effective September 4, 1996, adopted the amendments to the Standard Building Code, and included therein are the humcane standards at issue. Accordingly, the more stnngent hurricane standards had already been adopted by the City and were not part of the City's reViSion of portlOns of ItS Land Development Regulations. Due to the duties and responsibilities of the City's building department pursuant to state statutes, CarMax must comply With the hum cane construction standards m effect at the time of application for permIt. MJP/aa wp\developmentlcl\pennill cc AI Newbold, Actmg DITector of Development Tambn Heyden, Director of Planning & Zoning '\..<-f\ February 12, 1997 ~~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPI DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO 97-032 To Tambn Heyden, Planmng & Zomng DIrector tk From. Al Newbold, Actmg Development DIrector Re CarMax Please be adVIsed that the SIte Plan for the above referenced project Illustrates parkmg configuratIOns that are not m complIance With CIty Code. In reVIew of the Development Order and the CommISSIOn Meetmg Minutes, no mentIOn IS made pertaimng to the conSIderatIOn to allow parkmg configuratIOns to deVIate from the standards establIshed m the Land Development RegulatIOns. Comments regardmg these Issues have been forwarded to the applIcant WIth no response to date ThIS matter wIll prevent us from ISSUIng permIts untIl resolved. I have been mformed by staff that your pOSItIOn relates to the fact that smce the parkmg configuratIOn m questIOn IS for "storage" of vehIcles and not publIc parkmg, It should not have to comply WIth LDR Standards. That questIOn was raIsed at a TRC meetmg and objected to by Development DIrector HukIll. Furthermore, Chapter 23, SectIOn 4 ofthe LDR states that all areas for parkmg or storage must meet mmImum CIty reqUIrements. Surely, If such Code provlSlons are to be amended for thIS project, that actIOn must be taken by the CIty CommISSIon as per Chapter 23, SectIOn 2 of the LDR, after presentatIOn and deliberatIOn. If the plan as shown has ment, I strongly suggest that we meet WIth the CIty Manager to determme a course of actIOn m thIS regard. I would appreciate your response on thIS matter ~ Al Ne . old . AN/AO:mh cc Dale Sugerman, CIty Manager Project FIle C.\ WPWIN60\ WPDOCS\TRC\CARMAX.WPD PRUJI:.C'l' 'l'l'l'LE l.Il:.l:iLRI1''l'ION I}' V l' I:. DA'l'E REC' D '::::lNG LUG - '311'& ~.LAN REV.~.~.~ \UBHl'n'AL > NWSP 96-010 (_(\"" '''''1'j C'" W\~i) FILE Nu Npw Sitp Plan NEW SITE PLAN MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION R/?lLQf, AMOUNT $1500.00 kl::CIHl'T NO 02326 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * . . . * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: ~ULORED ELEVA'l'IONS REC I D c-... -,' 0 I ~y ~...) -\ ~~ ~:)) c;~ (Plans shall be pre-assembled The planning << Zoning Dept will number each sheet of their set The plannillg Dept set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match ) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * . * * * * * * * . * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION << SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE OF LET'fER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL : DATE ACCEPTED DENIED DATE "0 -.../ GI 1'\ -"'{c:- 1 \(" DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER REVIEWER ':::s NAME I'-'\{.~ l.-\r~- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I (Label TRC uepartments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMU NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TR~ TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW D~_'rE aEN'l' ~-d{,..,- c1lo ...llm\ I II((..~ ~Y'P"i lfV, ' I '! J~ PLANS \1" util ~ W Y Parks E'ire police ~ RETUkN DATE: 9--S-9.lA MEMO NUMBER QC.,-Y3S' 1st REVIEW COMMENT~ RECEIVED MEMO ~ I DATE I "e" q(,- )\g I 1ft~ I C/ 9( /O~ I I-CL- '7c. tf(;tJ / -!:1.I.l-/ ~ '1(" -,,)/'17 / ~/ c- Q}S'-i / q-:?-4k. / =:c: PLANS MEMO Jt I DA'l'E / ilL" 90~<.f78' I <:1/(0 I C-- /' . I~/-:;::;-- ~/ /~ ~~ 1/:: ~L Planning Building Engineer BRJlfteer J:~orestel. CX~ H&R \j I rYPE Of VARfANCE(:::S) DA'rE OE. MEETING DA1'E OF LETT~R SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS (Aesthetic keview App , dates of board mtgs ~ checklist sent out wi comments) NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID DATE 12 COMPLE'I'E SETS OF AME~DED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: lo-S-qCn (Must be assembled Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORBD BLBVATION8 RIC I D: MEMO SENT TO TRC T~ PERFORM 2nd REVIEW. DA'l'E SENT: I::) ( I C) C'1~ MEMO .: 9(c,-- CS:U [> RETURN DATE: t () I 2-3 J <1<0 I / 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL Util P W Parks Fire Police PLANS '~'-~~7)~ ~ ~~~ ~"~~D" +- DJ;u, I 10(1+ / C/ rt= (/ / . - .t / 11.11 f:l: I C/ Y QJ.1S / jC}';3 / </ PLANS y MEMO" / DA1B 9G--S-67 I (o/2JI cf f. 'j- / ~ (jclu / ; Old / '1t, l..... . / , f J) I /0 /7 I"R/D" I f --" ~U/ I / Q...../' planning BUilding Engineer Engineer Forster LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVBLOPMBNT SIONS PLACBO AT 'I'HE PROPBRTY OATS BaNT/SIONS INSTALLBD: SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD \\-\:l-qC) CC/CRA \ \-,~- ~lo DA't'1i: APPROVAL LE'l'TER SENT A 'l'kALKINli tiP 02/03 97 MO~ 17 03 FAX 1 407 894 4791 ..,...,_. n Kimley'HooJ ~ U and Assoclates, Inc. J KRA-ORU:-.TDO ~OOl ill FEB 4 1997 ~ fin .UlIll 200 I I ThQ Call illildllg .. ~1I 3113lawtJn ROad ! 'U Orlaldo, Florida 326G3 m@rnnw Fax Transmittal Comments: TEL 401 B&e 1511 FAX 4C7 694 It'S 1 ~7S- ~02P PhonsNo.. 'to? - ..17'::'- - '''~~..9 Job No.. Original comillg by mail: 0 Yes ;:; No ~ t"~ - ~h'_L r;~_ ~~~L To ~~ Jl1'~ FrnVLocstion. . ~ "~ :::: ~ - ~ -!#/ If you have any problt.ms, p!GaSi call 407 -898-1511 and aSK for flQlnllStfng PlllfInil'lg and tnvironmentQI Ca.1s'lhams iota! number af pages, i:'lcluding cover 8heet J ok / ~ ~ ~ ( Nov 6, '96 Tambri I talked to Jim Willard and Paul MacSomething toady, regarding a variance request for a third accessway from Carmax. Willard, of course, thinks that the variance isn't necessary and will call Cherof to get his determination that the variance is not needed ~ +I~ !lJ fv--C ;wf~d i f tZv~ ~ {'f [Ul ( I kv(/~ to lac 9Lh)~u'&~ ~ !tf fY~ P/iOY,_ ? b ( t4: r OVA'j- (~~ C _ 15 ~1Pu(4~; ~~,~J~4k~~~~1;~~~ :L~~l~ ~ (V~n~ It- (5 trzL/L, Cb1~lj~ ILL~~ Art I, 512 circulation, recreation, light, air and service needs of the tract when fully developed and populated, and which also provides such covenants or other legal provisions as will assure conformity to and implementation of the plan In granting such modifications, the commission shall require such reasonable conditions and safeguards as will secure substantially the objectives and standards of this ordinance Upon compliance with the foregoing, a public hearing shall be held by the commission Section 13 Appeals. Any person, firm or corporation claiming to be injured or aggrieved by any final action of the commission may present to the circuit court of the county a petition for a writ of certiorari to review such final action as provided by the Florida appellant rules Such petition shall be presented to such court within thirty (30) days after the date of final action by the commission ARTICLB II DBPINITIONS The words, terms and phrases herein shall be defined as follows unless otherwise specified in this ordinance The word "shall" is mandatory, the word "should" is preferred and the word "may" is permissive The singular shall include the plural and the present tense shall include the future tense and vice versa ABANDOHBD SIGN - Sign which no longer identifies or advertises a bona fide activity, where the activity has been abandoned or does not possess a current occupational license -x:- ABUTl'ING PROPBRTY - See "Contiguous Lands " ACCESS - The principal means of ingress and egress to a lot from a publicly or privately dedicated right-of-way ACCESS IfATBRIfAYS - A waterway which is developed or constructed for the purpose of providing access by water to lots within a subdivision ACCESSORY BUILDIlC OR STR.U\:J:uKB - A detached, subordinate building, the use of which is clearly incidental and related to that of the principal building or use of the land, and which is located on the same lot as that of the principal building or use ACCESSORY USB - A use that is customarily incidental to the principal use and so necessary or commonly to be expected that it cannot be supposed that these regulations intended to prevent it Accessory uses, unless otherwise provided, shall be located on the same premises as the principal use ADEQUATE PUBLIC PACILITIBS - Public facilities available to serve a development project so as to meet the levels of service and the conditions set forth in Chapter 1 5 A4op~e4 Apr11 4 1"5 Or41oeoce 0'5 02 ReVl..d 1-7 57 3 Physical character of the site The site shall be suitable for development in the manner proposed without hazards to persons or property, on or off the tract, from probability of flooding, erosion, or other dangers, annoyances, or inconveniences Condition of the soil, groundwater level, drainage and topography shall all be appropriate to both kind and pattern of use intended H DESIGN CRITERIA (0 1 Paving All interior paving shall comply with specifications and standards set forth and subject to the approval of the development director 2 Off-street parking One and one-half (11/2) parking spaces shall be provided for each two (2) employees on a maximum shift In addition, visitor parking shall be provided which is deemed adequate to serve the needs of the particular use by the planning and development board Accessways In the interest of public safety, no more than two (2) accessways shall be permitted on to any single perimeter public right-of-way and interior accessways shall be limited to no more than two (2) per developable parcel and interior accessways shall be located no closer than one hundred and fifty (150) feet from center line to center line 4 Hotel and motel density Permitted density for hotel and motel development shall not exceed twenty (20) units per acre 5 Utility transmission lines, etc All utility transmission lines, conduits, conveyances or other devices or apparatus for the transmission of utility services and products, including all franchised utilities, shall be constructed and installed beneath the surface of the ground with the exception of main overhead feeder lines Appurtenances to these systems which require aboveground installation shall be effectively screened, and, thereby, may be excepted from this requirement 6 Solid waste and refuse disposal Plans for solid waste and refuse disposal shall conform to and be approved by the city and county health departments Sanitary sewage system Sewage system will be furnished and installed in accordance with city standards and other pertinent city ordinances 7 Adopted Apr11 4 1"5 OrdiDaDee 0'5 01 Ravl..ct 2-63 11/07/1995 09 4M 40""3755211 SITV O~ BOY~TJ~ BSH PD,SE 01 rn ~@~DW~ tlNl- rn PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDCM #96-244 TO Tambri Heyden. Planning & Zoning Director Robert Eichorst, Publtc Works DIrector t THRU FROM Larry QUIIUl, SanItatton Supenntendent SUBJ CARMAX - New Application For Environmental PermIt - ER Q6-01 3 DATE November 4. 1996 Pubhc Works cannot approve tillS apphcatlOn as submitted because the Sanitation DivisIon would not have clear, safe access to the sohd waste container On October 31 1996 I met with the applIcant to discuss a SolutIon. The applicant has agreed to move the dumpster enclosure back approximately 30 feel and to proVide an exit onl) egre~s onto High Ridge Rd_ The applicant was advu;ed that a variance may be required for this and Public Works support provsl of this variance for safe, clear access to thIS enclosure. \. Lart) Quinn SalUtation Supenntendent LQ/er ,..-~ ~""i @ !i f\ ~Lj;~ , .1 bJf"!:!"'-:~'---- - ~ FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO 96-315 \1\1 NO\) - II!Si 1 Pl"NNING E"pNTD ZONING 0 . TO Tambri Heyden, Director Planmng & Zoning Dept. FROM. William D Cavanaugh, FPO I /J JI) /l Fire Department /VL/ 'Y L;a, DATE November 1, 1996 RE NWSP 96-010 Car Max Park Ridge Rd. - Quantum Park Dunng a meetmg With Car Max representatIves on October 31, 1996, the followmg Issues were rectIfied. ------------ ---._~----- ---.------. Gate clearance Tummg radu Fire lanes Egress from seTVlce court, west sIde (i.e. new eXit only gate Relocation of hydrants and fuel dIspensers ~~ t will send r ese Items noted. These draWings are clanficatlons and details of work alre y submitted and hould I!.()t hold up our process. ;y1Jw- -to ~V ~~ jvfl J) 'I cf~ ' - ~( ~P: 0}^e- 5 ~kj r~ cc Deputy Chief Ness FPO II Campbell File ~~f"~ ""yl.:I.1 vJ ~ for. ~ Vi fl'*' ~ l) ~ 1l(J~ '1A~r" .,,~ , IJI-' J ~ ,... 1AtA "t~"'1 ,)J~ 1~ ~ "'~ ~,.. I w:~ fil; ~ D , ~ NOV_'. ~ PlM~NING Am> ZONING DEI" I. TO' Tambn Heyden, DIrector Plannmg & Zomng Dept. FROM. Wilham D Cavanaugh, FPO I ~J JI) () Fire Department /(/v l' ~ DATE November 1, 1996 RE NWSP 96-010 Car Max Park Ridge Rd. - Quantum Park Dunng a meetmg With Car Max representatIves on October 31, 1996, the followmg Issues were rectIfied 1 Gate clearance 2 Turmng radll 3 Fire lanes 4 Egress from semce court, west SIde (i.e new eXit only gate) 5 RelocatIon of hydrants and fuel dIspensers Apphcant will send a new draWing With these Items noted. These draWings are clanficatlOns and details of work already submitted and should not hold up our process. cc Deputy CruefNess FPO II Campbell File ~ ~ ~\ ~~- i~ \ ~~c1 ~ \ f, ~ \ ~ \ ,t~\ ~~ \ ; ,,-~ % \ \ 1~ - \\ ~ \~ ~ ~~> (' ~ "0 <::. g\]~ ~ \ -<.~ &: \ "'~ 1> (" \ c,- C"' '* \ (p ~ \ ~-~ ~ \ \ ~~~ ~ \~~Z~~ :x ~ "l. I -<. t \ ~-'\i ~ ~ 10- \~- ~ ~ ~~&~ \ '~~~ i t~~. \_ fl ,"'"\ ]? _ Z. -'\~~ ~ \~ J ~ I _ 0;;: -'\ ~~ Z.i ~. -~ \ ~\ \ ~\ 0' -:z.. 1\ \ ",\1\ ~ ~\~ ~ ...... .'\ q f:1 .\ ~ ~ ,\'1, I ~ \ '\ \ \ . \1 \ \~\~ ~\\ \ \ \ ~ \ \ I \ .;:t' II \ ~ \1 q " \ ..to'. ... ' 1\ \ \ '" \ \ ' .z \ l \ , \ , , ~ I . , ~\ \ I .- :1 ,0- 11'1 \~ , \~ \ 4 \~\ n \*\\ 1\ \ill \ \ ji \ \ \ \ \ \\1 I~ t\~\) ~\ \1.\ \~ ~\\~\ h ~\fl \l \\"1 \ \..0;'\ \ \ 11 ' () \\\\~ \"\\:lJ \ \1 :lJ \"\1 \ \.A, \ '.... \ \' \ ~';\'" \'''~ , ,\"'1 \\\\\~ - - 11'1\ \\] \ \ \ \ \ \ I~,I \'.+; \ i \ \ \ -, \~\ ill" \ \ \ \~ \ ,\ \ ~\ \~\ \ ill \ \m\ \\0, \ \\1\\ ,~\ \ \ \ \ \ .....1 \ \ \ \ \\j\ \ \ \ \ \ \n \ \i;\ " \ '71 \ \ t~\ !. ~ $. \9- ~ ~ Z ..-\ m :lJ ~ ~ m <0 11' J " ~ " <:l ! -_._~ ~.8J1 W(;r ~~: IUNN1NG AND ONING DEn ~i LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT October 28, 13081 MILITARY TRAIL DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33484 Tambri J Heyden, AlCP Director Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Dear Ms. Heyden. Subject: Technical Review Committee Agenda The Lake Worth DraInage DIStrict offers the following comments regarding the Item( s) on the October 29, 1996 meeting agenda. 1 Quantum Park - Penpheral Greenbelt and Modified PID Sil:n Prol:ram - No ObjectIOn. No need for draInage review 2. Carmax - Lots 77, 78, 89 and 80 - Quantum Park - Parkin~ Lot VarIance and ~ ApplIcatIOn for EnvIronmental Permit. No objection on both Items. No need for draInage review As always, we thank you for beIng given the opportunIty to comment. SIncerely, L~ WOR~NAGE DISTRICT 4~ ,- Shaughn J Webb ChIef Inspector SJW /mfb c Ronald L Crone, P.E., P.L.S., Assistant Manager, LWOD PatrIck A. Martin, P.E., DIstnct Engmeer, L WOD Delray Beach & Boca Raton 498-5363 Boynton Beach & West Palm Beach 737-3835 FAX (407) 495-9694 Boarll 01 Supervisors C. Slanley Weaver Kermit Dell John I. Whltwor1l1 III SecnllalyiManager WIlliam G. Winters Asaislanl Manager Richard S, Wheelihan Attorney Perry & Schone, P.A. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO 96-098 w ~;:8U~ ~ @ aANNING~NO HI Put TO' Tambn J Heyden Planmng & Zomng DIrector lw'ld~ Hukill, P.E ~r of Development FROM. DATE October 28, 1996 RE CARMAX - 2ND SITE PLAN REVIEW We have agaIn reViewed subject project, and find the folloWing comments from our Memo 96-071 have been complIed WIth. None WVH/ck xc: Tony OcchlUzzo, Bldg. PermIt AdmmIstrator Ken Hall, Eng. Plans Check Inspector C:CARMAX2 RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-497 TO' Tambn Heyden, Planmng & Zonmg Drrector John Wildner, Parks Supenntendent ~ Carmax rJ - FROM. RE. DATE October 25, 1996 00 _25 f996 The RecreatIon & Park Department has reViewed the plans for Carmax. There are no recreatIon related comments. The project may contmue through the normal reView process. JWad PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 96-567 TO Tambri J Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM Jerzy Lewicki DATE October 24, 1996 SUBJECT New Site Plan - 2nd Review Project: Carmax Location Quantum Corporate Park Agent: James Thorton, Esq File No NWSP 96-010 The following is a list of comments and recommendations regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments and recommendations identify unresolved issues either from the first review or new problems that have emerged as a result of the second review All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the site plan request is approved The applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the Building Division for permits for the proposed project. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS 1 Off-street parking requirement for PID zoned properties is one and one-half (1 1/2) parking spaces for each two (2) employees on a maximum shift. In addition, visitor parking adequate to serve the needs of the dealership operation needs to be provided The submitted site plan contains calculation based on square footage of the building Amend the parking calculations appropriately 2 Modify the site monument signs to comply with the master sign program or process a separate site plan approval request to modify the approved sign program. Place a note on the plan indicating that all signs located on the site will require a separate site plan approval 3 Provide elevations of the building showing the roof top equipment and the required screening (all reduced to a small scale) and draw in on these elevations the lines-of-sight connecting the highest point of the equipment with the eye level from a distance of 600 hundred feet from the building 4 Dumpster and service areas have to meet design standards as described in LOR, Chapter 7 5, Article II, Section 5 J , and Chapter 9, Section 10 C Amend the drawings to meet the requirements Specifically, show the required landscaping along back and sides of the service area and dumpster enclosure 5 Chapter 2 of the LOR - Zoning, Section 7 0 requires that all parcels/lots being developed as one project within the PID zoning district shall be under the control of the applicant. Provide Unified Control document as required by the code provision 6 On the Landscape Plan, Sheet LA-1, amend the tabular summary of the planting material to include calculations for "shrubs required by the code" category These calculations shall be based on the 24" 0 c spacing requirement of the perimeter distances of the parcel 7 Indicate the spacing proposed for required perimeter trees Note that the Page 2 Memorandum No 96-567 2nd Review - New Site Plan Carmax NWSP 96-010 required trees in landscape buffers adjacent to right-of-ways shall be spaced a maximum of 40 feet 0 c. This requirement is not met at several locations 8 A continuous hedge shall be provided in all landscape buffers adjacent to rights- of way A part of the buffer along the eastern property line, just behind the Quantum Corporate Park sign, is missing If there is an existing continuous hedge meeting the city's landscape code specifications, incorporate this hedge, as an existing landscape material, into your landscaping plan It is also recommended that, in order to better screen the vehicular use area, a perimeter hedge will be planted north of the Display Lot. 9 Establish an access easement from the Carmax property to the existing Quantum Corporate Park sign and a maintenance easement around the sign Both easements shall be dedicated in perpetuity to the Quantum Park Association 10 It is recommended that an easement will be established, recorded in the Palm Beach County and dedicated in perpetuity to the Quantum Park Association for the peripheral greenbelt location, as approved by Board of Zoning Appeals 11 Submit to the Planning and Zoning Department a presentation board containing samples of all exterior building materials to be used for construction with the submittal of amended drawings 12 According to the development order for Quantum Park PID dated July 2, 1996, comment number 6, the loading/unloading area and the staging area combined together are considered to be an exterior storage area and limited to no more than 15 percent of the total size of the site Provide relevant calculations indicating that the combined staging and loading/unloading areas do not exceed 15 percent of the total site acreage or provide a City Commission waiver of this requirement of the above quoted development order 13 Provide a more detailed drawing of a vinyl clad woven mesh fence to determine whether it meets the intent of the Planning and Development Boards condition regarding screening 14 Lot 77 is abutting a residential district to the east. Increase the width of the peripheral greenbelt to 40 feet, as required by the code, or provide a verification letter from the Board of Zoning Appeals for the variance from this requirement granted for the reduction to 25 feet. Proposed landscape material within the peripheral greenbelt, shown on the Landscape Plan, Sheet LA-1, shall comply with the approved for this greenbelt design standards 15 In order to allow the staff to monitor the amount of traffic generated by the industrial and commercial uses in the Quantum Park and to determine how the anticipated traffic counts for the specific lots relate to overall traffic study counts for the entire business park, on the site plan, sheet SP-1, estimate the anticipated number of peak hour trips per day and total trips per day 16 The minimum width of the parking aisle is 27 feet. On the Site Plan, sheet SP-1, the dimension of the southernmost parking aisle is 25 feet. Amend the site plan to include appropriate width of the aisle or submit a parking variance application to the Planning and Zoning Department from this requirement. Page 3 Memorandum No 96-567 2nd Review - New Site Plan Carmax NWSP 96-010 17 Wall signs are not a part of the Master Sign Program for Quantum Park PID It is recommended that the proposed wall signs for Carmax be approved administratively subject to the sigange complying with Sign Code and Community Design Plan regulations stated in the LDR. This administrative approval process has been followed on the recent site plan approvals within the Quantum projects The administrative approval is only requested when the wall signage is shown on the submitted plans, as it is the case with the Carmax submittal 18 The site plan approval is subject to compliance with the Environmental Review Committee conditions 19 Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 11 J requires that no overhead doors shall be located within an elevation of the building that faces a public road (in this case High Ridge Road) Amend the west elevation drawings of the Carmax building and the carwash structure to eliminate the overhead doors from these elevations or submit an administrative appeal request from this requirement to the Planning and Zoning Department. 20 Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 4 L of the City's LDR requires that: "For new construction or major modification to existing developments, where an industrial district abuts a residential district, a solid, stucco masonry wall painted on both sides at least six (6) feet in height shall be located within the required side and/or rear yards except with respect to comer lots, said buffer walls shall be required only on interior lot lines. Said buffer walls shall not abridge any easement rights or be constructed over any existing utilities in any easement area and shall be set back two (2) feet from adjoining property lines. " Provide a buffer wall as required, or submit to the Planning and Zoning Department a zoning variance application from this requirement. JL.dim xc Central File O'ISHAREIWPIPROJECTSICARMAX\2NO-COM. WPO CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO' T AMBRI HEYDEN PLANNING & ZONING DlRECTOR DATE 23 OCTOBER 96 FILE FROM SGT MARLON HARRIS I/JAjEFERENCES POLICE DEPARTMENT /~ ENCLOSURES 0275 (I;J 2 3 1996 rn SUBJECT CARMAX -2nd REVIEW i;~ ...~. I have revIewed the above plans. In preVIOUS memorandum I requested further clanficatlon on the proposed median cutsand turn lanes on High RIdge Road. The applIcant also stated to me that thIS matter would be clanfied on the 2nd Submittal Other than thIS matter I have no other comments. MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT NO 96 - 332 (Ii] ~ U vf! r; rm j ItT 18 mil GJ ~ PlANNi, , ZONING liL. . TO. Tambn Heyden, Plann~n Director (7-0~c1}(e~_ ~~b- JohirAt)~<fmdr~, UtlIlt~ S Director FROM DATE. October 17, 1996 SUBJECT. Carmax - Site Plan - 2nd ReView We offer the follOWing comments on thIS proJect. 1) No trees, except Palm trees, wIll be allowed wlthm utihtles easements (Sec 7 5-18 1) 2) Dept of HRS permits wIll be reqmred for the water and sewer systems servmg thIS project 3) Fire hydrants shall be located wlthm 200 feet of any pomt on all buildmgs (Chap 6, Art III, Sect 16 - Land Development RegulatIOns) We have no objectIon to thIS project proceedmg through the reView process Please refer any questions on thIS matter to Peter Mazzella of thIS office Attachment-Plans JAG/PVM xc Skip MIlor FIle C:IOFFICEIWPWINIWPDOCSISEPOCT96ICARMAX,WPD RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-480 ill OGf I I 18~b ill ~~~nWffi TO Tambri Heyden, Planning Director Kevin J Hallahan, ForeslerlEnvironmentalist ~d- ~ Carmax - New Site Plan - 2nd Review FROM. RE. DATE October 16, 1996 The applicant has completed item #1 (below) but has not completed items #2-5 These comments are still in effect. The followmg comments pertain to the existing trees shown on the tree locations page (sheet 3 of 3). 1 The trees should be quantified and categorized by species to give an overall count for the total number of trees on the site (lots #77 -79}. 2. The trees whIch can be relocated should be moved to the greenspaces on the site 3 The trees WhICh must be removed due to site constraInts should be replaced and shown on the landscape plan. *Items 1-3 above are in accordance with EnvIronmental Regulations 7.5, SectIOn 13, page 3 4 The applicant should submit a letter to the City stating whether the SIte will be a mIcro-SIte on behalf of the Quantum Corporate Park. (Treasure Coast Regional Planning CounCIl requirement With the onginal Development of Regional Impact document) 5 The applIcant should landscape th ite adjacent to the 1-95 Interstate road in accordance With the City CommISSIon c nts e mmutes). The relocatIon of eXIstIng trees may aSSIst m creatIng the . sual buf e as dIS ussed in the CommIssion meetmg. KH.ad Attachment ,~ t? f;Ji/} ~ t~ I 'f~ .!;~! I ^I \ll ..f' ~ I JS 1. V'f'''t~ I ~jj'! Ii. 't '~f.J'" .;(~ ~ ~ ~ RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-480 ill "111M 00 TO Tambn Heyden, Planmng DIrector Kevm J Hallahan, ForesterlEnvuonmentahsl \..(.~ ~ Carmax - New Site Plan - 2nd Review FROM. RE DATE October 16, 1996 The applIcant has completed Item #1 (below) but has not completed Items #2-5 These comments are stIll In effect. The followmg comments pertam to the eXIstmg trees shown on the tree 10catlOns page (sheet 3 of 3) 1 The trees should be quantIfied and categonzed by speCIes to gIve an overall count for the total number of trees on the SIte (lots #77-79) 2. The trees WhICh can be relocated should be moved to the greenspaces on the SIte 3 The trees WhICh must be removed due to SIte constraInts should be replaced and shown on the landscape plan. *Items 1-3 above are m accordance With EnVIronmental RegulatIOns 75, SectIOn 13, page 3 4 The applIcant should submIt a letter to the CIty statmg whether the SIte Will be a mIcro-SIte on behalf of the Quantum Corporate Park. (Treasure Coast RegIOnal Planmng CounCIl reqUIrement WIth the ongmal Development of ReglOnal Impact document) 5 The applIcant should landscape the SIte adjacent to the 1-95 Interstate roadway in accordance With the CIty CommIsslOn comments (see attached mmutes) The relocatIOn of eXIstmg trees may aSSIst m creatmg the VIsual buffer as dIscussed In the CommISSIon meetmg. KH.ad Attachment PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #96-233 TO Tambri Heyden, Planmng & Zomng DIrector Carel Fisher, Deputy PublIc W orks Dlfector~ THRU FROM Larry Quinn, SamtatIOn Superintendent SUBJ New SIte Plan - 2nd ReVIew - Carmax DATE October 14, 1996 m I,; ~@~uwm OCT I 5 1900 NING AND ING DEPT. The comments that were submitted previously by the PublIc Works Department have not been satisfied The dumpster location as shown IS not servIceable ., arry Quinn SamtatIon Supenntendent LQ/cr ill PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-526 TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utility Dept Chief Field Insp Sgt Marlon Harris, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist William Hukill, Director Department of Development Tambri J Heyden, AICP, Planning & Zoning Director ~7'l October 10, 1996 FROM DATE SUBJECT New Site Project Location File No Plan - 2nd Review Carmax Lots 77, 78,79 and 80- Quantum Park Park Ridge Road Roscoe Biby, Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc NWSP 96-010 Agent Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced project for your final review and recommendation We would ask that you review this amended site plan submittal to determine if the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments previously made by your department If your comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing If your comments have not been met, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing Finally, we would ask that you include in your memorandum a recommendation as to whether the project should be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for consideration please return your memorandum and the amended plans (Engineering Division shall keep their plans) to the Planning and Zoning Department by 5 00 P.M on October 23, 1996 If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to call Jerzy Lewicki at Extension 6260, who is coordinating the review of this project cc Carrie Parker, City Manager (Plans) (Memo Only) Jim Ness Charlie Frederick Marshall Gage John Guidry a 2ndRevwm CAR RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-460 00 ~O~: ,O:~,ml 1 -----i FL ;P ~D ? 1.< ,~._..--..---_ TO' Tambn Heyden, Plannmg & Zomng Drrector John Wildner, Parks Supenntendent r Carmax FROM. RE DATE. October 1, 1996 The RecreatIOn & Park Department has reViewed the plans for Carmax. There are no recreatIon related comments. The project may contInue through the normal reView process. JW.ad ~~oomow~ ['i r ,I nll 'I . I 1 SEP 19 ~ IJJ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO 96-074 TO Mike Haag Planmng CoordInator f\tJ~ukill, P.E. {!M*r of Development September 18, 1996 FROM. DATE. RE CARMAX - DUMPSTER ACCESS ROAD The access to the Carmax dumpster IS not acceptable Weare aware that changes will be proposed. Please notify the applIcant that the access strIp IS an alley, and as such must comply wIth LDR Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, SectIon 2, page 6-6, mcludmg, but not lImIted to, eIghteen foot WIdth. WVH/ck xc' Al Newbold, Deputy DIrector of Development Carmax, 9950 Mayland Dnve, RIchmond, VA 23233- I 464 Kimley-Horn, 601 21st St, #400, Vero Beach, FL 32960 C:CARMAXRD FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO 96-297 TO Tambn Heyden, Director Planmng Department FROM. ~ilham D Cavanaugh, FPO I//I/;/ /1 . f FIre Department /t G"\} LLZ-ta1/C~ "- September 16, 1996 DATE RE Carmax - Quantum Park Lots 77-80 Park RJdge Rd. The fire department has a problem concemmg accessibility onto and WithIn this SIte, Generally turmng radu and lane Widths are too tIght for fire apparatus. There IS an example of thIs to the west of the main building. There shall be access for fire (i.e. fire lane around the whole buildmg) As set up, storage yards reqUIre several gate opemngs before portIons are accessible A means to expedite access should be reViewed or these areas will be consIdered wnte offs. Access after hours may be a problem, details on how this may be accomplIshed need to be presented. Fire hydrant locatIons are not shown, nor IS there mentIon of whether they are public or pnvate, please clarIfY cc Deputy Chief Ness Deputy Chief Gale FPO II Campbell File PLANNING tpNTU IQNING 01:. . ~ LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT \...AJ\.../~I.-^-,^..j September 16, 1996 ll_ofS..,."_,,, C. Stlllll~ Weav<< Karmll Dell ,Jolm I. WhIlWWh in ~.......r William G. W1!1l1B Aat.lam lAM. AAhvd e. V't'hoetI:.G1\ A1lorntY Ptrty & SChone P.A. ~'" 13081 MIl.ITARY TRAIL DII'!L..AAY BEACH. FLORIDA M-484 Tambri J Heyden, AICP Director Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Dear Ms. Heyden. Subject: Technical Rel'iew Committee Agenda The Lake Worth Drainage District offers the following comments regarding the lte01(S) on the September 17, 1996 meeting agenda: East Ridge - ThlS project is not located in the L wnn servIce area. 2. Carmax at Quantum Park PID - No obJecttons. This prOject "",ill, however, require a drainage: pamit pnor to construction. 3 Bell South Mobility - No objections. As always, we thank you for being given the opportumty to comment. Sincerely, LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT Shaughn J Webb Chief Inspectol SJW /mfb c Ronald L Crone, P.E.. P.L.S Assistant Manager L wnD Patrick A. Ma.rtm, P .E. Distnct Englneer L WDD 09lray Beach & Boca Raton 49&-5363 eoynlDn BoadI & West Pam 8Me1'1737.3Il3S fAX (407) 4l!5-95i4 I !\-orr"'h- n r-':lt='t=' I n I L~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO 96-071 DATE. ~;;~?i ~HeYden, Planmng & Zomng Drrector ~ Hukill, P.E., DIrector of Development September 13, 1996 TO FROM. RE. CARMAX - 1ST SITE PLAN REVIEW We have revIewed subject project but recommend that It not proceed any further until the parkmg lot and median cut Issues are resolved eIther by modIficatIons to the draWings or vanance approval In the sales lot. l\one of the 510 proposed and 143 future spaces are eIther long enough or located on satIsfactory aIsles. In the storage lot, none of the 461 spaces are long enough and more than half of them have no backup space. Even where a backup space IS available, most of It IS not m complIance. With respect to the proposed expanded medIan cut, the alIgnment WIth the road to the west IS not satIsfactory, although it IS possible a "peanut" m the cut mIght resolve the Issue. We will have at least the followmg comments when the SIte plan goes forward. Engmeenng DIVISIon 1 ReVIse documents to reflect all comments. 2 All plans submItted for speCIfic permIts shall meet the City's code reqUIrements at tIme of applIcatIon. These permIts mclude, but are not hmited to the followmg: SIte hghtmg, paVIng, draInage, curbmg, landscapIng, lITIgatIon and traffic control deVIces. PermIts reqUITed from agenCIes such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permIttmg agency shall be mcluded WIth your permIt request. 3 No buildmg, structure, screen enclosure, pool, or portIOn thereof IS allowed wIthm setbacks, eIther now or In the future. Chap 1, Art.II, pg.I-30 4 VehIcle wash dram and floor draIn must be pretreated pnor to dIscharge. Chap.2, Sec 4Nll b, pg.2-14 5 Car wash shall be fully automatIC and recycle all water used. Chap.2, Sec 1IL3e(4)(c) 1 & 2, pg.2-113 6 An EnVironmental ReView IS reqUITed. Chap.2, Sec 11.3,6, pg.2-133 7 Drawmg statement must address the effects of the antICIpated deSIgn dIscharges on the eXIstIng draInage system. Chap 6, Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 8 ProVide CertIficatIOn by Developer's Engmeer that dramage plan complIes wIth all CIty codes & standards. Chap 6, Art.V Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8 9 MImmum 15" pIpe must be used In storm sewer Chap 6, Art.IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 10 Inlets must be m grassy areas unless otherwIse approved. Chap 6, Art.IV, Sec 5B, pg.6-8 and Chap.23 Art.IIF, pg.23-8 Development Dept. Memo No 96-071 Re' Carmax - 1 st SIte Plan ReVIew September 13, 1996 Page #2 11 * Parkmg lot sectIOn must conform to CIty code. Chap 6, Art.IV, Sec IOF, pg.6-12 12 * ProVIde details for pavement, grates, pIpes, catch basIns, etc Chap 6, Art.V, Sec 4B2e, pg.6-20 13 Top of dramage pIpes must not Interfere WIth subgrade. Chap 6, Art.V, Sec 4B2I(6), pg.6-20 14 * ApplIcant's attentIon IS dIrected to Chap 7, pg.7-1 regardmg surety requIrements 15 * All landscaped areas shall be proVIded WIth an automatIc water supply system. Chap 7 5, Art.II, Sec.5B, pg.7.5-14 16 SpecIfy clear SIght tnangles at all dnveways and adJust landscape plan If needed. Chap 7 5, Art.II, Sec.5H2, pg.7 5-17 17 * ExcavatIon and/or fill permIts will be reqUired. Chap 8, Art.I, Sec.2, pg.8-1 18 Not more than two free standmg SIgnS are allowed. Chap.21 Art.IV, Sec.3B, pg.21-17 19 * PermIts must be obtaIned for work wIthm R.O W Chap.22, Art.II, Sec 7 A, pg.22-3 20 LocatIon of proposed curbs IS not clearly defined on the drawmg. Chap.23, Art.I, Sec.5BI5, pg.23-5 21 Parkmg lot drmensIOns, stnpmg, aIsles, stalls, radll, SIgnS, landscapIng, etc must conform WIth CIty codes and standards. Chap.23, Art.II, pg.23-6 22 ProVIde a satIsfactory hghtmg plan. Chap.23, Art.IIA, pg.23-6 23 * Photometncs must be approved for both pedestnan and parkIng lot lightIng before permIt can be Issued. Chap.23 Art.IIA la, pg.23-6 24 * CertIfy that lIght poles are m complIance WIth Standard Buildmg Code and WIthstand a 110 mph wmd load. Chap.23, Art.IIAla, pg.23-6 25 * ProVIde stop SIgnS and stop bars In accordance WIth the "Manual on Umform Traffic Control DeVIces" Chap.23, Art.IIB2, pg.23-7 26 * No trees shall be planted so as to Interfere WIth lIghtmg fixtures. Chap.23, Art.IIAb, pg.23-7 27 Landscaped areas m parkIng lots must be protected by wheel stops or curbs. Chap.23 Art.IIE, pg.23-7 28 Concrete curb must conform to City standards. Chap.23, Art.IIE, pg.23-7 29 MaJor dnveway must have 100' clear to I st access aIsle unless varIance prevIously granted. Chap.23, Art.IIH5, pg.23-9 30 Provtde 27' backup area, all stalls. Chap.23, Art. II ,II , pg.23-9 31 ParkIng stall mmrmum 18' long. Chap.23, Art. II ,II , pg.23-9 32. ProVIde reqUIred fire lane markmgs and sIgnage Chap.23, Art.IIM, pg.23-9 33 ProVIde locatIOn & details of fire lanes. Chap.23, Art.IIM, pg.23-9 34 ProVIde contInUatIOn of SIdewalk thru all dnveways to mark pedestnan paths. Chap.23, Art.II, Sec.P pg.23-10 35 Pamt handIcap pavement symbols whIte. Sheet 9 ofFDOT Index 17346 Development Dept. Memo No 96-071 Re' Carmax - 1 st SIte Plan ReVIew September 13, 1996 Page #3 Buildmg DIvtSIOn 36 * SignS must be consistent WIth Quantum Park SIgn program. LDR Chap.21, Art.IV, Sec 7, pg. 21-20 37 SubmIttal IS In vlOlatIOn of Condltlona1 Use Development Order comment No 6 Issued July 16, 1996, In that vehIcle storage area exceeds 15% of the SIte. See ExhibIt G, Planmng & Zomng comments No 6 38 SubmIttal IS m vI01atlOn ofCondItlonal Use Development Order P1anmng & Zomng comments No.6 & 7 and P1anmng & Development comments No 1 & 2 WIth respect to fenCIng and screemng. See ExhibIt G Many of these comments are Included to mform the applIcant of Issues whIch will need addreSSIng pnor to future reVIews, but will not In themselves prohibIt thIS plan from mOVIng forward. Those comments are marked WIth an astensk* WVH/ck xc' Ken Hall, Eng. Plans Check Inspector Tony Occhmzzo, Bldg. PermIt AdmmIstrator c-CAR.J\1AX ml 100 ~~'T. __~_.~)tJl~~. ~'" e_~ '" S'-'OoI'\i:'~fS C. Stamey Wea'w Kafmi t C{l John 1. Wl'>llWO'':'> ll, S4cNtart'''''''- W11!am G. WI~le!'$ 1&1"'.aMlIoI.r~' RicnAt~ s. WhM"r.~ I\llomef Pettf & r;chO.~i ;::> A. LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~-,""""""'--^-j ---^--' '-''- ',--, 13081 MILlTMY'fRAIL. DEL.RAY BEACH, FLORIDA 334$4 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL ATTN: dr... DATE: FIRM: CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER ~vr- ~ TELEPHONE NUM:BER FROM .d~~"'- ~010 S~^ (561) 737-3835 or 498-5363 .~ ~~LblJ FAX NUMBER ( " ) 495-9694 This transmittal consists of ~v ( ~) paies. including this pag~ If you do not receive al~ of the pages. or if there are any probl~m~. please call AODUIONAL COMMENTS S~rcJ cOr ~,(\a( ~ -\:1<\l=.N ya.: L ~ ,....-~~, A ae OO:rclf ~ & Boca AaIO" 49&5365 VA- ~ "'- 70 (JW'v cJ 0 (It-~ w.. . r!frJ~~ ~W[)D5 _.o_.:t_~,_ 'A' ~~~ ~~/.~ - l c V596 967 199 3~VNIV~O H~dOM 3~VI .C~~ f,1LC 8 SF:; [-9[-5 ~."'\ S \~. ~ ~ 1 OJ cS v "- ,co \ 1 91) Plfl.NNING AN\) lQNING Dr.PT. ~'" LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT \...A...A.../" ~'--A...-^-..A-^- September 16. 1996 13081 MILITARV TRAIL DEL..AAY BeACH. FLORIDA 55484 Tambri J Heyden, AICP Dueetof Planning and Zonmg City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 DefU' Ms. Heyden. Subject: Technical Rel'iew COJnmittee Agenda The Lake Worth Drainage District offers the follo"'loS comments regarding the ltem(s) on the September 17, 1996 mee'hng flgendft. East RIdge - ThIs proJecT is not located In the L wnn servIce area. 2 Carmax a.t Quantum Park PID - No ObjCctlOns. This project v.1.11, however, require a dramage pc::rrrllt prIor to construction. 3 Bell South Mobility - No objections. As always, we thank you for bemg given the opportWl1ty to comment. Sincerely LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT Shaughn J Webb ChIef InspectoJ SJW/mfb c Ronald L. Crone, P .E., P .L.S., Assistant Manager, L wnD PatrIck A. Martm, P _E_ DIstnct Engtneer L WDD Oell'8Y Bead! & Bo<;a Raten 49&-5363 eoyniDt'l B.ladI & West Pam Beach 737-3835 fAX (407) 4~~ G G ?596 56' 195 3~~NI~dO HldOM 3~~1 Cd~ f "V'8E 8 966! -9[-5 .~ 6 ll_ 01 ~...."'...'" c_ SlMl&)' Weavur Ke'l'llII~1 Jolin I. Wf1ItNQ(n III -kNWyAl....' William G. WI~teB Aasletarn M811agEt I'\loI'on:l e. ~~"C~ At.lortlt'y Ptr/y & seMon!! P_A. rD)~@~~\Yl~~ UlJ SEP I 2 96 ~ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #96-203 TO Tambri J Heyden, AICP, Planning & Zomng DIrector FROM Larry QUInn, SamtatIon Supermtendent SUBJ New Site Plan - 1st Review - Carmax DATE September 11, 1996 The location of the dumpster inclosure at the above SIte as shown on the plans submItted IS unacceptable to the PublIc Works Department for the follOWIng reasons A) The entrance way to the dumpster IS shown to be fifteen feet wide, with two way traffic ThIS would not allow our truck and another vehicle to pass In the alley B) There IS no room for the truck to turn around which means the truck would have to back down a narrow alley that's 140 feet long through a control gate, thIS IS not acceptable ~ Larry QUInn SanitatIOn Supenntendent LQ/cr --~---- - [' rm ill 15 J;; . ~ ,J ~ ---"1 I ~ 1,1, ;; :t. SEP12936 W RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-430 TO' Tambn Heyden, Plannmg DIrector PLANNING AND "ZONING DEPT. FROM. KeVIn J Hallahan, EnvironmentalistIF orester ~~t DATE September 12, 1996 SUBJECT Carmax- New SIte Plan- 1st Review The following comments pertaIn to the eXIsting trees shown on the trees locatIOns page (sheet 3 of 3). 1 The trees should be quantIfied and catorigIzed by species to gIve an overall count for the total number of trees on the SIte (lots #77-79) 2 The trees which can be relocated should be moved to the greenspaces on the site. 3 The trees which must be removed due to SIte constramts should be replaced and shown on the landscape plan *Items 1-3 above are m accordance WIth EnVIronmental RegulatIOns 7 5,sectIon 13 p3 4 The applicant should subrmt a letter to the CIty statmg whether the site will be a micro-SIte on behalf of the Quantum Corporate Park.(Treasure Coast RegIOnal PlannIng Council requirement WIth the ongional Development of RegIOnal Impact document.) 5 The apphcant should landscape the SIte adJacent to the 1-95 Interstate roadway In accordance WIth the City CommISSIOn comments (see attached mmutes) The relocatIon of eXIsting trees may aSSIst in creatIng the VIsual buffer as discussed In the Commission meetIng kjh c:.- , JU..or}, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 96-478 TO T ambri J Heyden 0# Planning and Zoning Director Jerzy Lewicki ? V DATE September 10, 1996 FROM SUBJECT New Site Plan - 1 st Review Project: Carmax Location Quantum Corporate Park Agent: James Thorton, Esq File No NWSP 96-010 The following is a list of 1 st review comments regarding the site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced project. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan review are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies, he should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. 1 The minimum width of the two-way driveway is 20 feet. The proposed east-west driveway to the dumpster area is only 15 feet in width Increase the driveway width to meet the city's required design standard for the width of two-way driveways 2 Indicate traffic control markings within the entire vehicular use area as required by LOR, Chapter 4 - Site Plan, Section 7 8.2 3 Delineate a traffic turn-around from the area between the presentation lanes and the service area 4 Proposed signs must meet the setback requirements of 10 feet (provide necessary dimensions) Also, provide elevation drawings of the signs and specify their height, size and colors The proposed signage requires a submittal of a revised master sign program for the Quantum Park PID If the latter is not approved prior to this site plan being forwarded to the Commission, it is recommended that the signs be deleted and submitted at permitting for review administratively provide they comply with the approved revised master sign program 5 Any roof top equipment will have to be screened from view at a distance of 600 feet. If such equipment is planned, indicate its location and the height of the equipment above the roof level Provide elevations of the structure showing the roof top equipment and the required screening (all reduced to a small scale) and draw in on these elevations the lines-of-sight connecting the highest point of the equipment with eye level from a distance of 600 hundred feet from the building 6 Parking spaces located on the sales lot area do not comply with the City's design standards Redesign the parking within this area to comply with the code If it is not a parking lot, then it is a storage lot and must comply with the maximum of 15 percent of lot area permitted for outside storage areas in PIDs 7 Dumpster and service areas have to meet design standards as described in LOR, Chapter 75, Article II, Section 5 J , and Chapter 9, Section 10 C Amend the drawings to meet the requirements Page 2 Memorandum No 96-478 1 st Review - New Site Plan Carmax NWSP 96-010 8 Chapter 2 of the LDR - Zoning, Section 7 D requires that all parcels/lots being developed as one project within the PID zoning district shall be under the control of the applicant. Provide a unity of title for the lots being assembled in connection with the development of the site plan (Forms are available in the Building Division) 9 On the Landscape Plan, Sheet 11 of 14, amend the tabular summary ofthe planting material to include a "landscape material required by the code" category Also, provide relevant calculations for this category For the landscape buffer adjacent to the right-of way, provide perimeter distances of the parcel for which the landscape buffer material is being calculated 10 Incorporate the above calculation into the tabulation of the landscape material provided for the site All native species shall be distinguished from non-native species with a recognizable symbol 11 Indicate the spacing proposed for trees and shrubs Note that the required trees in landscape buffers adjacent to right-of-ways shall be spaced a maximum of 40 feet 0 c. 12 Remove trees, other than palms, from utility easements 13 A continuous hedge shall be provided in all landscape buffers adjacent to rights-of way A part of the buffer along the eastern property line, just behind the Quantum Corporate Park sign, is missing 14 Provide an access and maintenance easement from the Carmax property to the existing Quantum Corporate Park sign 15 Lot 77 is abutting a residential district to the east. The width of the landscape buffer on this lot shall be increased to 40 feet. Increase the width of the buffer as required by the code or submit an application to the Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance from this requirement. On the Landscape Plan, Sheet 11 of 14, how proposed landscape material within the required peripheral greenbelt. 16 Although the PID greenbelt plans application has yet to be formally submitted for staff to comment, it is recommended that the greenbelt landscaping shown on the Carmax drawings be supplemented to include a more substantial amount of planting The landscaping proposed satisfies merely the landscape code requirements for parking lots 17 With respect to environmental review' a) revise pages 3 and 4 of the application to include MSDS (material safety data sheets) for all chemicals used and stored on site and the quantities, b) provide further detail regarding references on the application to "a normal auto dealership" and c) show on the site plan resubmittal the location of the bulk storage of tires (new and used), all chemicals used and stored (to be provided in a containment area separate from the rest of the operations for safety reasons) and the proposed spray booth 18 According to the development order for Quantum Park PID dated July 2, 1996, comment number 6, the loading/unloading area and the staging are combined together are considered to be an exterior storage area and limited to no more than 15 percent of the total size of the site Provide relevant calculations indicating that the combined staging and loading/unloading areas do not exceed 15 percent of the total site acreage Page 3 Memorandum No 96-478 1 st Review - New Site Plan Carmax NWSP 96-010 19 Provide a detail drawing of a vinyl clad woven mesh fence to determine whether it meets the intent of the Planning and Development Board's condition of a 6 foot tall opaque screen Indicate associated 10 foot wide, dense, vegetative buffer (the buffer may be included within the width of the required peripheral greenbelt) JL.bme xc Central File a:carmax.nsp MEMORANDUM UtIlItIes # 96-287 ..... :--- ~'~ -\I l;t ,;p ~ u PW1NING Ai ZOt\\iNG DE TO Tambn Heyden. Planmng & Zom Date September 9, 1996 FROM John A. GUIdry, DIrector of UtIlItIes SUBJECT Carmax, New Site Plan First Review Staff has revIewed the above referenced proJect and offer the follOWIng comments 1 A CapaCIty ReservatIOn Fee wIll be reqUired WIthIn thIrty (30) days of CIty CommISSIOn approval, or upon request for my SIgnature on the HRS/DEP permIt applIcatIOns. The fee amount Will be determIned based upon meter SIze or expected demand, (Sec 26-34[E]) 2 Plan shall speCIfy meter SIze and locatIOn, (Sec 26 16(c)) 3 Backflow preventors are reqUired for certam uses, (Sec 207(d) (4)) 4 FIre hydrants shall be WIthIn 200' of all pOInts on every commercIal bUIldmg, ((Chapter 6, Art. IV Sec 16) 5 Plan shall show locatIOn of all eXIstIng and proposed utIlIty easements, (Sec 26.33 (a)) 6 Palm Beach Health Department permIts may be reqUIred, (Sec 26 12) 7 Only palm trees wIll be permItted In utIlIty easements, (Sec 26.33(a)) 8 CIty water WIll not be supplIed for lITIgatIOn. Please show source and locatIOn of proposed water supply for ImgatIOn, (CIty Comp Plan, PolIcy 3C 3 4) It IS our recommendatIOn that the plan proceed through the reVIew process. If you have any questIons regardmg thIS subject, please contact SkIp Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404 smlmax 1 xc Clyde "SkIp" MIlor Peter Mazzella FIle CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO' FROM. TAMBRIHEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR 3 SEPTEMBER 96 DATE FILE. SUBJECT CARMAX - NEW SITE PLAN 1st REVIEW SGT MARLON HARRIS REFERENCES POLICE DEPARTME~ ENCLOSURES #0254 I have reVIewed the above plans and have no comments at thIS time rn SEP _5- PLANNI ZONING DEPT. ill ~~ PLANNING ANLJ ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 96-435 TO Carrie Parker, City Manager Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept. Chief Field Insp Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department AI Newbold, Building Division William Hukill, Director of Department of Development Kevin Hall~pan'.. Forester/Environmentalist ~(=.~(o~ TambrveYden, AICP, Planning & Zoning Director August 27, 1996 FROM DATE RE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1 st Review - New Site Plan Project - Carmax Location - Lots 77,78,79 and 80 - Quantum Park Park Ridge Road Applicant - Roscoe Siby, Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc File No - NWSP 96-010 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. New Site Plan approval for this project will be granted by the City Commission To ensure that the project stays on line with the review time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and formal written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on September 13. 1996. Do not return plans and exhibits Retain same for the review of the amended plans (second review) Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval 1 Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments 2 The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete based on the submittal requirements identified in Section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance However, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and Zoning Department. 3 Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents 4 Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements 5 When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified Page 2 of 2 Carmax Quantum Park To TRC Members Re Planning & Zoning Memo 96-435 6 If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memo Jerzy Lewicki will be the Planning and Zoning Department staff member coordinating the 1 st review of the project. The Planning and Zoning Department will send the applicant a cover letter which includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission When the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, they will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for review and approval T JH dar Attachment XC (Memo Only) Fire Chief Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Central File A. 1 stREVCM.wpd PROJECT NAME: CARMAX ( J-u.:"",'j - C'llr ~\'(\i- ~ CONTACT PERSON: NAME: Rocky Biby - Kimley Horn & Assoc PHONE. (561) 562-7981 FAX: (561) 562-9689 TYPE OF APPLICATION: New Site Plan FILE NO: NWSP '96-010 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: ~-\~-9lo PUBLIC NOTICE: ADMINISTRATIVE TRC MEETING: C( ~ <:'~l~~ - TRC MEETING DATE: q-\J--~~ RESUBMITT AL DATE: 2ND REVIEW COMMENT DUE: LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS POSTED: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING: t\- 11- Cl~ CITY COMMISSION MEETING: \ \ I cr JK~ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING: A:PROJECT.FRM