CORRESPONDENCE
l....r/"
('
/~
r~z
SoP ' ,77
Richard W Carlson, Jr , Esq.
2377 Crawfo.'d Court
Lantana, FL 33462-2511
Phone (561) 433-0172
Telecopier (561) 433-0874
August 19, 1998
Thomas McGillicuddy, Senior vice Pres
MFT Development, Inc
292 South County Road, Suite 141
Palm Beach, FL 33480-4273
/
Re Hampton Inn - Monument Sign - Quantum Master Sign plan
Dear Thomas
It was a pleasure meeting you two weeks ago relative to the
Original Pancake House site plan approval application Yesterday
the Boynton Beach Technical Review Committee (TRC) met on that
application In that meeting the status of the existing Hampton
Inn monument sign located just west of the west entrance to Lot 1
(Sign) was discussed relative to the City'S approval of the Sign
Recall that the Quantum Park Property Owners' Association
(Association) has approved the sign A copy of that approval was
provided to you with my letter to Bulent Kastarlak of August 7,
1998 Hence, all that remains is for it to be recognized by the
City under the Quantum Park Master Sign Plan (Master Sign Plan)
The discussion at TRC surrounded how the City should proceed
in formally approving the Sign Prior to yesterday the direction
of the City was to include it as part of the restaurant application
for site plan approval on Lot 1 However, in light of the fact
that MFT Development will present a proposed revision to the Master
Sign Plan in the near future, it was decided by staff that the
existing Hampton Inn monument sign should be specifically addressed
in that plan as IIvested, II lIexisting, II or lIapproved II It was
recognized by staff that the sign is consistent with the existing
Master Sign plan and in fact is substantially smaller than the
thirty foot high by twenty-seven foot wide Carmax sign on 1-95
Staff asked that I send you a copy of the specifications on
the Sign for inclusion in the proposed revision to the Master Sign
Plan as set forth above In that regard I enclose an original of
the Hampton Inn Hotel Signage Standards showing the various signs
Thomas McGillicuddy, Senior vice Pres
August 19, 1998
Page 2
acceptable to the franchisor The existing Sign is identified in
that brochure as "P-32 Specifications, Monument Sign and Script
Letters" It is a twelve-and-one-half foot tall, approximate eight
foot wide, monument sign bearing the corporate "Hampton Inn" logo
Based on the City's direction, please include this Sign in the
proposed revision to the Master Sign Plan When you have completed
the draft of that plan, please provide me with a copy for my
information Finally, please advise on the timing for bringing the
proposed revisions to the Master Sign Plan forward Although the
City preferred to address the Sign in your efforts rather than the
Original Pancake House application, I doubt they want to leave this
issue outstanding for a substantial time given there is the
opportunity to address it in the Original Pancake House site plan
approval application
Please advise if you need anything further I look forward to
hearing from you soon and working with you on this matter I hope
you enjoy success in the development of Quantum Park It is a fine
project that can be an asset to the City
SrJely /
~j/ {4-tJ':---
Richard W Carlson, Jr , Esq
c Bulent Kastarlak, Director of Development, wfo enc
Mike Rumpf, Acting Planning Director, wf enc
Mike Haag, Building Division, wf enc
Mike Panakos, Boynton Beach Hospitality, Inc , wfo enc
George White, AlA, wfo enc
Monument Sign and Script Letters
Script Lener Specifications
'-32 Specifications
· Size 5'-2" x 8'-1 1/2" Double-faced
pole sign 32 sq ft
· 12'-6" Mounting Height
· Screen printed polycarbonate sign
faces
· Fabricated beige aluminum sign
cabinet
· Fabricated beige aluminum pedestal
· High output fluorescent illumination
r
B,
-i
· Sizes 36 in ,48 & 60 in Script Letters
(Larger Sizes are available)
· Copy layout" Stacked or Single line
· Letters for light colored backgrounds
Red acrylic faces and dark bronze
channel returns with clear red neon
illumination
· Letters for dark colored backgrounds
White acrylic faces and beige channel
returns with clear red neon illumination
<[ (J(amp lMu c1 /lIlJ.
· Letters have self-contained transformers
SINGLE LINE HAMPTON INN SCRIPT LETTERS
LETIER SIZES sa, FT, ArB
36" LETTERS '65,25 I 36' I 21',9" i
48' LETIERS 1111 16 48'" 27'.9112" '
60' LETTERS 173,75' 60" 34',9"
_ B, oj
1.1 :, 'UnmnlMu
J I Vf':;i-r
V~
STACKED HAMPTON INN SCRIPT LETTERS
[ LETTER SIZES sa FT A
36" LETTERS 75 36"
I 48" LETTERS 130 48"
, 60" LETTERS 203 60"
B C
13' 73/4" 5',6"
17',83/4" I 7'.4"
22',2" 9'.2" I
-Fr~ l ~ ~.~ .J-. vc-h.. Iu ~SD
Richard W. Carlson, Jr., Esq.
2377 Crawford Court
Lantana, FL 33462-2511
Phone (561) 433-0172
Telecopier (561) 433-0874
r':-~' .. R (i;,
~'\ l'\ 15 l!::'
\Ur>~
I n i i FEFE'
LIUL-'
PL
z .
L,
100
,-1
J
February 3, 1998
Tambri Heyden, AICP, Director of Planning
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Re Quantum Park, Lot 1 - Waiver of Platting Request -
Review far Location of Lot Line
Dear Ms Heyden
Thank you for your quick response to the waiver of platting
request or. Quantum Park, Lot 1 As we discussed, enclosed is a copy
of the proposed site plan for the restaurant-area of Lot 1, along
with ~he overall site plan of the entire Lot
I send this to you for your review as to the location of the lot
line Please review this to ensure that the location will not
violate any Boynton Beach land development regulations
After we spoke, I talked to John Yeend who. informed me the
Director of Development is responsible for reviewing plat waiver
requests Accordingly, it is not necessary that you approve the
\','ai ver request However, we should make sure the lot line is
properly located
Please review this at your earliest convenience so that we may
proceed with the application for waiver of platting Negotiations
with the prospective purchaser have resulted in the seller being
responsible for obtaining a waiver of platting The application for
SitE:: p~an a:pproval ~1i 11 be the responsibility of the buyer Vie
expect the application for the restaurant use will be fil~d in thrRA
to four months
I thank you for your attention and I look forward to hearing
from you soor.
t:' :C}!rf{l .,,- /
t",-i., ,tC---fv~
'ch~ W Carlson, Jr , Esq
c Pat Guarini, wfo enc
Mike Panakos, wfo enc
Bulent I Kasterlak, NCARB, wf enc
John Yeend, P E , wf enc
George White, wf enc
Jeffrey Deutch, Esq , wlo enc
Ted Lain~e, wfo enc
.a-,n Q ,
~
l Q
\ l \
~
'lPJ - -- iii
{
{J {t
\
1
I I
, \ ~
, I
\ l o I
\
,
\ \ ~ I I
I
,
,
, ~\ I I
m\
;1 :
~ i\ l
l
..\ I
-\ \
\ 1 I I
m' l ,
. '
, \ l
\ I I
\
, ~
\ I
I
\ .~ \
\ I
,
I
I .0-.11 .0 .0' I
\ \ I .~ lIe tj-,OI 411/1 I-.ee
1
1 I o l
, 1)
1 I J}
, I I I
I \ \
\ I
I I
CS\ \ \ I
~\ '~A~ .llIn:t I I I
\ I
I {
\ \ \ -
\ I ,
, J
I .o-~
I
I
I \ ~ I
1
~
, \ l \ I
I
\
\ -~-~
\
I
\ \
I i'n n
,
\
, ..-.fJIC o;j.l..1. ~,o..
\ &Ol'O~~ 4-
I
\ - t
,
\
- - -- -.. - - -~- --
!)I$.O~E. \.
-----; -~ 1--~-.
~ IiJ .0\ , (0
.,OL en '3'(1 ONnO~
- -
t
I
1
~n-"N""O "'.1IM
.~..~~~o~ ~s..~~~~. gN~'
,a"e e;!:ilWlneJ:;,tI oLe;!' .a.N3~..rQW
e,L J....ltlCl ..3=:1:1\1 2~n... noli
JAI'j 27 98 03 45Pf1 8ROfi~ riND CASSEL. "'SSOC 1l'4C le~lS1g767091
.... c......... ... rJ.9o ,... '" ... "'!' ~
, --I .....
\~
\
, i
1
I \
i i
. ~r
,
,
I
I
!
I
1
I
i
i
i ,I I
I~ .
t
ii( ,i
;1 ,I
I
,
I
i
i
1
I
,
I
I
:\
, i
1 1/1
, . ~
. 1
i~'.< I
\ ,
\, 1 ,,'",'
~- - I
a / I
? {
"-r.
f I';,
alii
, tt
r ..,
..
,
I
Ctl
l' I
'=
!
~
...$
PReP
~
P 3'> e3
I
I t
I
III
\
..........."...
.. -,......:" M
:1 Iii uni' I~ ji @
; ~ I I I ~ If = I! I
I I I ~i ~
Ii.... sl it ~
I el ~ I I
D FtESTAUAANT
"'--...
fur
,.~
\ Ii
. George F. White ^,I.^. and Assodates,lrI:. ,
14" ......111 r".+ml Hlgh'ny !Il11. r 81i1'. 1I....n. rlorlda WI7 Ul 8.7 IIt8
. I
I
Richard W Carlson, Jr , Esq
2377 Crawford Court
Lantana, FL 33462-2511
Phone (561) 433-0172
Telecopier (561) 433-0874
-'.~'T.f;, n----;;-~.-.
~.] U r~"_lJ1,
"L I
-J'
8 .' i
....J
t-.,=...._'-
January 24, 1998
Bulent I Kasterlak, NCARB
Director of Development
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Tambri Heyden, AICP, Plan Dir
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re Quantum Park, Lot 1 - Hampton Inn Property - Sale of East
Portion of Lot 1 - Waiver of Platting Request
Dear Mr Kasterlak & Ms Heyden
I represent Boynton Beach Hospi tali ty , Inc (Boynton
Hospitality), relative to the sale of the east portion of Lot 1,
Quantum Park Boynton Hospitality is negotiating for the development
of the restaurant on the east portion of Lot 1 Negotiations have
revealed that both Boynton Hospitality to sell, and the restaurant
operators desire to own rather than lease, the property on which the
restaurant will be located
I write you to request that the platting requirement for the
subdivision of this lot be waived In that regard, I direct your
attention to the Land Development Regulations, City of Boynton Beach,
Florida (LDR's), Chapter 5, Article II, Section 1 It provides in
pertinent part
except platting may be waived if
A The land to be subdivided is to be divided into
no more than two (2) contiguous lots and no more
than three (3) regularly shaped areas are to be
dedicated to the Ci ty of Boynton Beach
(easeillents, tracts, park3, rights-of-way etc )
and because
* * * *
3 The imp::-ovements and dedications
existing on the land are substantially
in accordance with the requirement of
this chapter and if the waiving of the
requirements for platting would not
conflict with the purpose and intent
of this chapter
B The resubdivision of land heretofore platted is
of such simplicity or is surrounded by such
Bulent I Kasterlak
Tambri Heyden
January 24, 1998
Page 2
development as to justify the waiving of the
requirements for preparing a replat
The sale/subdivision of Lot 1, Quantum Park, meets both of these
criteria Lot 1 was created by the Quantum Park at Boynton Beach,
P I D Plat No 1, recorded at Plat Book 57, Pages 182-183 (Plat)
The plat was recorded in September of 1987 Obviously at the time of
platting all the required improvements were installed and all the
necessary dedications were made
In early 1997 the Hampton Inn at Boynton Beach was approved by
1:he City Commj sRion At that time, the review was performed to
ensure campI iance with the LDR' s No additional dedications or
improvements were required at that time because all requirements
which are not site-related had been done Accordingly, the
resubdivision of the land is of such simplicity as to justify the
waiving of the requirement for platting
I'm sure you will agree that there is no need to go through the
exercise of replatting Lot 1 so as to subdivide it into two lots
Procedurally, Section 2, of Chapter 5, Article II, provides that
a pre-application and an affidavit of exemption must be submitted
Please consider this letter the pre-application unless there is a
particular form for such Please advise what must be done in the way
of an affidavit of exemption Also, please advise what process is
involved It is clear that the review and approval is at the staff
level only given that Section 2 provides that the Director of
Development and Director of Planning
shall review the pre-application and determine if one of
the foregoing conditions exists and, upon affirmative
determination, shall delete the requirement for platting
I am having a ....ertified survey prepared that \'Iill show the
internal lot line for Lot 1 This will facilitate your review of the
substance af the matter and serve as the basis for establishing the
internal lot line
I ~hank you for your attention and I look forward to hearing
from you soon
~i relY'L
- t::- J<>'-..
ch1(rd W Carlson, Jr , Esq
c Pat Guarini
Mike panakos
TI-/ ~
13 ~
, lli ffi F~B ~; W ffi I ill \
~
PLANNING AND
IQNING DElll
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. ENG 98-020
TO
DATE
Bulent I Kastarlak, Drrector of Development
John Yeend, P.E CIty Engmeer ~
February 2, 1998
~J
\
.
\ \ J (\ i
I \~ I
\ , 1"-,,
\ 0' 'JJ\
J \ ~l'
, %N{G'dV
\ / \\ tI /\ '
'. Ij I' ~
\' \ r, \' 1\, I
lil'o.7 , ~/
'-./ 'y
I
I
FROM
RE
WAIVER OF PLATTING REQUEST
HAMPTON INN PROPERTY
I have received Mr Carlson's letter dated January 24, 1998 regardmg the referenced Issue and
have the followmg comments:
I have faxed Mr Carlson a copy of the current LDR Chapter 5, ArtIcle II, Section 4 It's
apparent that he was quotmg from an older version.
2 Under the proVIsIons of Section 2 It IS my opinIon that the diVISion of Lot I quahfies for a
warver proVIded the followmg be submitted.
a. Fee of$200 00
b CertIfied survey showmg property boundarIes, rIghts-of-way and easements (m
accordance WIth Paragraph D)
3 Concurrence of thIS waIver by the Buildmg and Plannmg and ZOnIng DIVISions.
4 I usually process these apphcatlons and prepare a letter, for your signature, approvmg the
waIver
JSY/ek
Xc Don Johnson
Tambn Heyden
MIchael Haag
C \1v D.'cum.:nl~ Ilampllln Inn Waiv.:r of Planing,doc
fD)ffi@UWffi~
ln1 FEB - 3 ~
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO ENG 98-020
PLANNING AND
10NING OEPl
L
DATE
Bulent I Kastarlak, DIrector of Development
John Yeend, P.E , CIty Engmeer ~
February 2, 1998
TO
FROM
RE
WAIVER OF PLATTING REQUEST
HAMPTON INN PROPERTY
I have received Mr Carlson's letter dated January 24, 1998 regardmg the referenced Issue and
have the followmg comments.
I have faxed Mr Carlson a copy of the current LDR Chapter 5, Article II, Section 4 It's
apparent that he was quotmg from an older verSion.
2 Under the provISIons of Section 2 It IS my OpInIOn that the divIsion of Lot I qualtfies for a
Waiver prOVided the followmg be submitted.
a. Fce of$200 00
b Certified survey shoWIng property boundanes, nghts-of-way and easements (In
accordance with Paragraph D)
3 Concurrence of thIS waiver by the BuildIng and PlannIng and Zomng DIVISIons
4 I usually process these appltcatlons and prepare a letter for your signature, approvmg the
waiver
JSY/ck
Xc Don Johnson
Tambn Heyden
Michael Haag
C \1v Oocum':n1SHamphln Inn Waiv.:rofPlatting,doc
QUANTUM PARK
PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION
NA TIONAL CITY CENTER
115 WEST WASHINGTON STREET
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204-3464
January 23, 1998
Mr Michael Panakos
ManaglOg Partner
Boca HospItality - Hampton Inn
1455 Yamato Road
Boca Raton, Flonda 33431
\Re Boca Hospitahty, Inc (Hampton Inn) - Lot 1 of Quantum Park at Boynton Beach,
Flonda, Pill Plat No 10
Dear Mr Panakos.
ThIS letter shall serve to confirm that the ArchItectural ReVIew Comrruttee ("CommIttee")
of the Quantum Park Property Owners Association, Inc ("AssocIatIOn") has reViewed and
approved the specIficatIons for the Hampton Inn monument sign deSignated P-32 It is
our understandmg this IS the trade Sign that the franchisor - Hampton Inn - reqUIres and
meets their specifications. The P-32 sign IS referenced 10 the plans prepared by George F
White A.I A. and ASSOCIates, Inc, Project Number 96271, dated April 21, 1997 The
plans and thiS approval are pursuant to ArtIcle 4 of the Declaration of ProtectIve
Covenants of Quantum Park at Boynton Beach, as amended. No changes shall be made to
the plans as approved Without the pnor written consent of the Comrruttee unless such
changes are to the internal layout of a structure
QUANTUM PARK PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION
ARC HlTECTURAI REVIEW C01\1MrrTEE
ad- f'" JL
Arthur Felsher
By'
cc Suzanne Amaducci, EsqUIre - Shutts & Bowen
Richard Carlson, Jr , EsqUIre V
Richard W. Carlson, Jr , Esq
2377 Crawford Court
Lantana, FL 33462-2511
Phone (561) 433-0172
Telecopier (561) 433-0874
(;k (~
~~
i Nl;J5P
December 9, 1997
Michael J Pawelczyk, Esq
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Re Quantum Park - Hampton Inn - Lots 1 and 1A - Seperation of Lots
Dear Mike
We have discovered that we have an outstanding condition on
the City Commission's approval of the Hampton Inn, located on Lot
1 of Quantum Park The development order was issued April 15,
1997
Condition 36 provides
According to the tax maps, Lot 1 of Quantum Park
subdivision contains a drainage easement tract Since
the easement is to be separated from Lot 1, provide a
survey of the proposed changes and record this document
) in the Palm Beach County records and with the Property
Appraiser's office Provide recordation document to the
Planning and Zoning Department for verification prior to
issuance of building permits (emphasis added)
This condition resulted from two statements on the subdivision
of Quantum Park which provided Lots lA (lying east and west of Lot
1) are an integral part of Lot 1 This connection of the lots
caused staff a great deal of concern during the approval process
Because only Lot 1 was in for review and approval staff required
this condition so as to separate Lots lA from Lot 1
Note the condition requires that a survey be recorded
Recording a survey would accomplish nothing and is in fact not
necessary because the no lot lines are were changed and they are
easily described and identified by the recorded plat A statement
of record needs to be recorded that severs the lots We have
prepared a Disclaimer to accomplish this
I submit this to your and staff's review so that we may comply
with your direction Please review this at your earliest
convenience so that we may record it as required and deliver a copy
to the City There is a loan closing scheduled the week of
December 22, 1997, for the permanent financing on the Hampton Inn
and I expect lenders counsel will require this document
I will be out of the office from December 11 through 15,
inclusive Joann Petroff, Joyce Elden's assistant at Broad and
Cassel may be contacted in my absence Joann's number is 832-3300
and her fax is (561) 655-1109
Thank you and staff for your prompt review
to hearing from you soon
We look forward
~in erely, /
t-4a. --
R' ~d W Carlson, Jr , Esq
c Joyce Elden, Esq , wfo enc
Tambri Heyden, wf enc
\
ill rn@muwrn rn
Prepared By and Return To. DEe".
Jeffrey A. Deutch, Esq
Broad and Cassel PLANNING AND
7777 Glades Road, Suite 300 ZONING DEPT.
Boca Raton, FL 33434 '--
DISCLAnmi
I
THIS DISCLAIMER is executed thiJ day of , 1997, by
Boynton Beach Hospitality, Ltd , a :Florida limited partnership
("Owner") . I
BACKGROUND:
I
A ~ner has acquired fee simple title to Lot 1 of Quantum
Park at Boynton Beach, P.l.D , Plat No.1 as set forth in Plat Book
57, Page 182 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida
I
("Property"). I
I
,
B. The Plat of Quantum Park at Boynton Beach, P I.D , Plat
No. 1 contains the following stateme~ts:
I
I
Lot l-A, Water Management Tract A, Drainage Easement being an
integral part of Lot 1, See Paragraph No. 6 of the Dedication
in Sheet 1 of 2 Sheets. I
!
I
"
The perpetual drainage easement canal granted to the Lake
Worth Drainage District per Of~icial Records Book 454, Page
1~96 and 1297, is an integral I part of Lot No 1 as shown
hereon. The water management tr~ct "A" is a drainage easement
and is also an integral part of said Lot 1 Tract A may
include submerged land.
I
C. The April 15, 1997, Development Order of the City
commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, approved a site
plan for a 65,916 square foot, .107 unit hotel on Lot 1
("Developlnent Orderll) _ Condition 36 of the Development Order
requires the recordation of a documept to reflect a separation of
Lot 1 from the adjacent drainage easement tracts.
I
NOW THEREFORE, in order to satisfy Condition 36 of the
Developlnent Order, Owner hereby disclaims any ownership interests
R,\R\ROCA~IM.I
1
q C;T iF... Mill )30
t>00-rl Cjl'.8-! Bf.f,-:J
/
-"
in any portion of Lot l-A and further confirms that Lot 1-A is
hereby separated from Lot 1 so that Lot 1 ~A is no longer an
integral part of Lot 1. Owner reserves the right to use Lot I-A
for drainage purposes only.
This Disclaimer is a covenant r~nning with the land and it
shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors
and assigns of the owner The effect of this Disclaimer may be
terminated and this Disclaimer shall be cancelled of record at any
time that the City of Boynton Beach m~y elect to alter, amend or
terminate Condition 36 of the Development Order
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed on the
day and year first above set forth
BOYNTON BEACH HOSPITALITY, LTD., a
Florida ilimited partnership
By
Boynton Beach Hospitality,
In~., a Florida corporation,
it~ general partner
By:
Michael Panakos, President
\
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) SS
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____
day of , 1997, by Michael Panakos, as President of Boynton
Beach Hospitality, Inc , a Florida corporation, as general partner
of Boynton Beach Hospitality, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership,
on behalf of the partnership. He <___> is personally known to me
or <____) has produced as identification
Notary Public
Name
Commission Expires:
Serial Number
Jt:\8\BOCAHQS~.1
2
t'T C;T 65. 50 )30
~00-d 968-1 866-~
*,112
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
IIDJ~~ @ m u w m.@1
UlJj NW 3 0 /Q07 fl U!!
wi
i
1
PL~~JNllJG NW
ZO!~INl: DEFT.
,
I
-......~-)
TO:
DIane Reese, Finance DIrector
~
FROM.
John A GUIdry, UtilIties DIrector
DATE:
/J p, I 2-7/ {97 7
SUBJECT: ReservatIOn fee transmIttal for -
Enclosed IS a reservatIon fee for the subject p
Amount - _.$. 2. @, 11 () 6 , 72
Check no - ( D ib r I r) I 7
From - a~/~ hQ.A-tt !tJP,/4 LL
Please deposIt thIS fee III the appropnate account You may refer any questIOns on
thIS matter to Peter Mazzella of thIS office
JAG/PVM
bc Peter Mazzella
xc Tambn Heyden, Planmng DIrector
File
-
-
-
-
-
1J~lla~J ];ngineering, Ine
CIvil engineers
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
)
Apn125th,1997
Mr John Guidry, UtIlItIes DIrector
CIty of Boynton Beach
5469 W Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33437
RE Water and Sewer Permit Applications
Hampton Inn at Quantum Park
Dear Mr GmdI)
Enclosed are the followmg Items for the Hampton Inn to be constructed m the Quantum
Park, located on NW 22nd A venue
. FIve (5) completed permit apphcatIOns for the water mam constructIOn.
. Five (5) completed permit apphcatIOns for the sanItary sewer constructIOn.
. Ten (10) sets of SIgned and sealed water and sewer plans.
. Two (2) checks for $2,106 72 each. These checks are for the reservatIOn depOSIt for
the 2-mch meters to be mstalled at the SIte.
Please contact me when you have completed revIewmg the submIttal package and have
Signed the permIt apphcatIOns. Someone wIll pick up the apphcatIOns from your office
for transmIttal to the Palm Beach Health Umt.
Thank you,
2631 E Oakland Park Boulevard Suite 108 Ft Lauderdale, Florida 33306
(954) 563 1788 (954) 563 ] 8] ] Fax
6001 NW 153 Street Suite G Miami Lakes Florida 330] 4 Tel/Fax (305)825-0402
internet wvvw Ironed neti- holleng
em oil rollenq@lconect net
Apn12,1997
D~ ...>> ARTMENT OF DEVE-.-.OPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
Itf ~::~ ~l@
PLANNING AND J
ZONING DEPT.
00 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
O. Box 310
oynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
RIchard W Carlson, Jr , Esq
2377 Crawford Court
Lantana, FL 33462-2511
RE DRIVEWAY WIDTH - LOT 1, QUANTUM PARK
Dear Mr Carlson.
I have dIscussed the referenced Issue WIth our consultmg engmeer, John Yeend, and It has been
revIewed by Jerzy LeWIckI of the PlannIng and Zomng Department. Based on good engmeenng
practIce, we will accept the 42' Width to match the eXIstmg dnveway on the OppOSIte SIde of the
street.
If I can be of further aSSIstance, please contact me
Smcerely,
~:Y
~c~t~~:~ctor of Development
ANbg
XC John Yeend, P.E, ConsultIng Engmeer
Jerzy LeWIckI, PlannIng and Zomng Department
Sebastian Puda, Engmeenng Inspector
Pernut file
C'\BOYNTON'DOCUME-I\DRIVEWAY WPD
Phone' (561) 375-6350
Fax (561) 375-6357
...:J I I '-'HI'" lUI-U ,-,uur..
Lantana, FL 33462-2511
Phone (561) 433-0172
Telecopier (561) 433-0874
~-- ~ : I.';"~ W
March 28, 1997
BUilDING DIVISION
Al Newboldl Acting Director of Dev
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beachl FL 33435-0310
Re Boynton Hampton Inn - Lot 1, Quantum Park - Driveway Width
Approval
Dear Mr Newbold
Richard W. Carlson, Jr., Esq.
2377 Crawford Court
Lantana, FL 33462-2511
Phone (561) 433-0172
Telecopier (561) 433-0874
fij m ~ m 0 WI .m rn1
lJl] tAftR 3 I _ ~
BUILDING DIVISION
March 28, 1997
Al Newbold, Acting Director of Dev
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Re Boynton Hampton Inn - Lot 1, Quantum Park - Driveway Width
Approval
Dear Mr Newbold
I represent Boynton Hospitality, Inc , in its application to
the City of Boynton Beach for an hotel on Lot 1, Quantum Corporate
Park
In my and Jim Despiritos' discussions with Jerzy Lewicki, he
has indicated the driveway width for the western entrance is wider
than provided for in the Land Development Regulations, City of
Boynton Beach, Chapter 23, Article II, Section HI ("Section HI")
The proposed driveway is 42 feet and the maximum provided for in
the Section HI without your approval is 32 feet
I write to request your approval to the 42 foot wide driveway
The driveway width of 42 feet was selected because the entrance to
Motorola to the south across Gateway Boulevard is 42 feet wide
Note that this is a signalized intersection and the thinking is
that the widths across Gateway should match so there is no
deflection I trust you will agree that this is the best traffic
engineering approach
Please write Jerzy and me with your approval under Section HI
Thank you for your attention to this matter
to hearing from you soon
I look forward
Si7?l~1-
~ W Carlson, Jr , Esq
c
Jerzy Lewicki
Pat Guarini
Jim Despirito, A I A
Susan Holland, P E
\
,/-
\ \ '\
~ \' ,4.
,.\
~~~.'" ~\
;tY~ W
J-' rs r;u fC 11 vf1 R ill
: i\ !" Ls j~) ~ II (j l!; ~
I J I ;o-_..'"~._--'----,
.J l i ,
:...u! lvlAR 3 I 1991
Richard W Carlson, Jr , Esq
2377 Crawford COUl"t
Lantana, FL 33462-2511
Phone (561) 433-0172
Telecopier (561) 433-0874
PLANNING ANI)
ZONING DEPT.
March 28, 1997
Al Newbold, Acting Director of Dev
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Re Boynton Hampton Inn - Lot 1, Quantum Park - Driveway width
Approval
Dear Mr Newbold
I represent Boynton Hospitality, Inc , in its application to
th2 City of Boynton Beach for an hotel on Lot 1, Quantum Corporate
Park
In my and Jim Despiritos' discussions with Jerzy Lewicki, he
has indicated the driveway width for the western entrance is wider
than provided for in the Land Development Regulations, City of
Boynton Beach, Chapter 23, Article II, Section HI (IISection HIli)
The proposed driveway is 42 feet and the maximum provided for in
the section H1 without your approval is 32 feet
I write to request your approval to the 42 foot wide driveway
The driveway width of 42 feet was selected because the entrance to
Motorola to the south across Gateway Boulevard is 42 feet wide
Note that this is a signalized intersection and the thinking is
that the widths across Gateway should match so there is no
deflection I trust you will agree that this is the best traffic
engineering approach
please write Jerzy and me with your approval under Section H1
Thank you for your attention to this matter
to hearing from you soon
I look forward
sinc ely, ~
/lr ~ 1-___
'~hard W Carlson, Jr , Esq
c Jerzy Lewicki
Pat Guarini
Jim Despirito, A I A
Susan Holland, P E
~i=r~
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Engineering
Planning
and
Environmenlal
Consullanls
March 14, 1997
Mr Richard W Carlson, Jr
Attorney At Law
2377 Crawford Ct.
Lantana, FL 33462-2511
RE. Parking Generation
Dear Mr Carlson
The purpose of this letter is to provide information regarding the parking generation
for non-convention center hotels, such as the Hampton Inn, proposed in Quantum
Park.
The Institute of Transportation Engineers publishes a informational report entitled
"Parking Generation", which serves as an industry standard for projecting parking
demand for various land uses. The data are based on studies and research
conducted by transportatIOn professionals across the country
The studies reflect the number of 'peak parking spaces occupied" per each room in
the hotel Several land use entries in the report are relevant 10 the projpct in
question The non-convention center hotel is likely the closest land use to the
proposed Hampton Inn As noted in the attached page from the Parking Generation
Report, on weekdays, there were 52 occupied parking spaces per room during the
peak time of the day Because the proposed Hampton Inn is expected to serve the
employment activities in Quantum Park, we would expect weekdays to represent
the peak time during the week.
We also looked at some of the other types of hotels referenced in the Report. As
shown in the attached report entry, motels without restaurants and/or lounges
produced 51 occupied parking spaces per room Both sample sizes are small,
however, there is added support for the results by virtue of the consistency between
the two studies.
As a reasonability check", we reviewed the parking generation for convention
hotels and motels with restaurants and/or lounges. We would expect the parking
rates at these hotels to be higher than the parking rates at hotels without restaurants,
lounges or convention facilities; and they were
.
TEL 407 898 1511
FAX 407 894 4791
.
Suite 200
The Carr Building
3113 Lawton Road
Orlando. Florida
32803
~I=n
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Mr Chip Carlson, March 14 1997 Pag!' 2
The attached report entries provide the results of this comparison As noted in the
convention center report entry, these hotels produced .81 occupied parking spaces
per room Motels with restaurants and/or lounges produced .89 occupied parking
spaces per room
In summary, it appears the 1.25 spaces per hotel room will provide more parking
than is needed to serve the proposed Hampton Inn Based on the data presented, a
parking rate of 9 spaces per room will be adequate to accommodate the parking
demand of this hotel
If you require additional information or have questions regarding the enclosed,
please do not hesitate to contact ue;.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
( f nit V\ /"". e
Laura B Firtel, AICP
Associate
LBF/ggh
Copy 10: Kpnnf'lh I rink
Steven G. Godfrey
h:\04901602\carlson.314
,
'I.
I; I
i '
I
NOI. CONVENTION HOTEL ~312)
Peak Parking Spaces Occupied vs ROOMS
On a WEEKDAY
PARKING GENERATION RATES
Average
Rate
0.52
Range of
Rates
0.29-0 68
Standard
Deviation
Number of
Studies
4
Average Number of
Rooms
188
DATA PLOT AND EQUATION
I
I
i
CAUTION-USE CAREFULLY-LOW R2 AND SMALL SAMPLE SIZE.*
130
0
0 120 -
w
a:
::::>
0 110 - 0
0
0 ~
en 0
w 100 -
0
~
en 90 - ~
(!)
z
S2
ex: 80 -
~
~
~ <( 70 -
w
a..
II
a.. 60 -
0
50 I I , , , , I , 1 I , 1 ,
100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
X = NUMBER OF ROOMS
0 ACTUAL DATA POINTS - FITTED CURVE
Fitted Curve Equation P = 0 33(X) + 36 0
R2 = 0 089
i
l'
I
1-
Parking Generation, August 1987/lnstitute of Transportation Engineers
44
MOTEL Wl. rlOU,T RESTAURANT/l JUNGE (322)
Peak Parking Spaces Occupied vs ROOMS
On a WEEKDAY
PARKING GENERATION RATES
Average
Rate
0.51
Range of
Rates
0.25-0 72
Standard
Deviation
Number of
Studies
4
Average Number of
Rooms
136
DATA PLOT AND EQUATION
CAUTION-USE CAREFULLY-SMALL SAMPLE SIZE.*
150
140
0
w 130
a.. 0
::) 120
0
0 110
0
en 100
w
0 90
~
en 80
<.9 70
z
~ 60
a:
~ 50 0
~
<( 40
w 0
a..
30 0
II
a.. 20
10
0
0 100 200 300
X = NUMBER OF ROOMS
0 ACTUAL DATA POINTS FITTED CURVE
Fitted Curve Equation P = 0 37(X) + 11 0
R2 = 0 854
Parking Generation, August 198711nstitute of Transportation Engineers
50
! i
I!
!
..
Ct.,."VENTION HOTEL (31 -,
Peak Parking Spaces Occupied vs ROOMS
On a WEEKDAY
PARKING GENERATION RATES
Average
Rate
0.81
Range of
Rates
0.26-1.32
Standard
Deviation
0.29
Number of
Studies
22
Average Number of
Rooms
449
900
Cl 800
w
0-
::)
() 700
()
0
en
w 600
()
~
en 500
(!J
z
~
a: 400
~
~
< 300
w
0-
Il
0- 200
100
100
DATA PLOT AND EQUATION
CAUTION-USE CAREFULLY-LOW R2
o
o
o
..
o
~
300
500
700
x = NUMBER OF ROOMS
o ACTUAL DATA POINTS
Fitted Curve Equation Ln(P) = 0 71 Ln(X) + 1 42
R2 = 0 498
Parking Generation, August 1987/1nstitute of Transportation Engineers
40
900
FITTED CURVE
060
Number of
Studies
10
Average Number of
Rooms
221
t.:
g:
c:
c:
c:
g:
t;;
t:
MOTEL Wll RESTAURANT/LOUN E (321)
Peak Parking Spaces Occupied vs ROOMS
On a WEEKDAY
PARKING GENERATION RATES
Average
Rate
089
Range of
Rates
o 40-2.58
Standard
Deviation
DATA PLOT AND EQUATION
CAUTION-USE CAREFULLY-LOW R2
280
260
0
w 240
0...
::>
0 220
0
0 200
en
w 180
0
~ 160
en
C) 140
z 0
:;2\
a: 120
~
~ 100
<(
w 80
0...
II 60
0...
40
20 0
40 80
o
o
~
o
o
o
120
160
200
240
280
320
360
x = NUMBER OF ROOMS
o ACTUAL DATA POINTS
FITTED CURVE
Fitted Curve Equation P = o 42(X) + 70 0
R2 = 0496
I
I
I
I
J
i
46
Parking Generation, August 1987/lnstitute of Transportation Engineers
tJ& City of
'Boynton 'Becu;1i
\
,I (
_)1 y~
"'~7'
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Bw:fi 'Boulevard
P.O. 'BD;t310
'Bognton 'Beach., :Flinitfa 33425-0310
City!J{afl (561) 375-6000
:F}1X. (561) 375-6090
FAX # 561-433-0874
February 28, 1997
Mr Richard W Carlson, Jr , Esq
2377 Crawford Court
Lantana, FL 33462
Re Hampton Inn at Quantum Park
Density Calculation and Accessory Restaurants dated Feb 27
Dear Mr Carlson
I have reviewed your two letters, received February 18, 1997, regarding the Hampton
Inn density calculation and accessory restaurant administrative decisions that I have
made However, after considering the points you've raised, my decisions relative to
these two matters remains unchanged Therefore, as set forth in the city's code, if you
choose to challenge my decision the proper avenue is to file a request for an appeal of
an administrative official, with the appropriate fee, to be reviewed by the Board of
Zoning Appeals Their next meeting is March 17, 1997 However, your density
variance is already scheduled before the Board at this meeting Please contact Mike
Haag of my office to inform him as to whether you wish to replace the variance with an
appeal and whether you will be filing an appeal for the accessory restaurant
determination
Sincerely,
/~ ~( <1\J/Jlt!v\ttfu
t!1T;bri J Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
T JH dim
xc: Jim Cheraf, City Attorney
Mike Busha, Treasure Coast RPC Executive Director
Mike Haag, Current Planning Coordinator
O'\SHARE\WP\PROJECTS\HAMPTON\OEN-RES WPO
jfttUrU4S (jateway ~~ t.fu (jutfstream
/
iJ1ie City of
'Boynton 'Beach
~ II .J I
j' f
100 'E. flJugnton flJeadi flJoufevartf
P.O. flJ~310
flJoynton flJeadi, j'Wrufa. 33425-0310
City :Jlafl: (561) 375-6000
!JY'lX. (561) 375-6090
'~v
February 24, 1997
George F White A.I.A. & Associates, Inc.
5455 N Federal Hwy , Suite F
Boca Raton, Florida 33487
RE. Initial Review Comments - Hampton Inn at Quantum Park
File No NWSP 97-001
Dear George White
The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the documents submitted for
the above-referenced project. Attached are comments made by the reviewing departments
during their initial review of your project.
In order to complete the review process, the site plan and documents must be amended
to comply with these comments within 90 days of the date of this letter (If amended plans
are not submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required) When there are
comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not applicable to the approval of the
project or will be addressed separately and you have not amended the plans to comply
with the comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment stating why
the comment is not applicable and return the explanation with the amended plans and
documents
After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12) complete sets
(including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and Zoning Department. When the
amended plans and documents have been submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Department, they will be distributed to the reviewing departments for second review and
recommendation to the appropriate boards for approval or denial. A recommendation for
denial will be made if there are major comments that have not been addressed on the
resubmitted plans
jfmericas (jauway ~.; t,tje (juEfstream
Page 2 of2
Initial Review Comments
Hampton Inn at Quantum Park
File No NWSP 97-001
Dates pertaining to the remainder of the review process are as follows.
. The amended plans will be due by 5 00 P M on March 7, 1997
. The request will be presented to the Planning and Development Board on April 8,
1997
. The request will be forwarded to the City Commission as a development plan on
April 15, 1997
If you should have any questions regarding the comments or the approval schedule,
please feel free to call Jerzy Lewicki, who is coordinating the review of your site plan for
the Planning and Zoning Department.
Very truly yours,
T:f~2d;~
Planning and Zoning Director
T JH bme
Atts.
d:\project\hampton\ 1 stcommt.wpd
CI:IECKLISI
The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that the submittal of amended plans
and documents is substantially complete for review Turning in this list and the appropriate plans and
documents will enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the Planning and
Zoning Department.
Project Name Hampton Inn at Quantum (File No NWSP 97-001)
1 Submit an amended Site Plan Review/Conditional Use application form that reflects the changes
that were made as a result of amending the plans and documents to comply with the Code of
Ordinances and the Technical Review Committee comments A copy of the original form with a
distinguishable symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a completed new form with
the changes identified If there are no changes required to be documented on the application
form, a letter from the applicant stating same must be turned in with the amended submittal
2. Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents, including surveys that
show compliance with the Code of Ordinances and comments made by the Technical Review
Committee Two (2) of the sets shall have the appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the
designer responsible for the drawing(s) Plans and documents shall be assembled in twelve (12)
individual complete packages with the title of the project on all pages and/or sheets and each
page or sheet numerically numbered such as the following example. 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3
3 Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are to remain in their existing condition
and photos of existing buildings that are located on the sites that abut the perimeter of the subject
property The minimum size is 4" by 6" Each photograph shall be labeled to identify the location
of the existing structures with respect to the location of the proposed project. If the abutting
property is vacant photographs are not required
4 Submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored duplicate copy of all drawings of the elevation
views of each side of all buildings and signage associated with the project. The colors shown and
described on the colored elevation views shall match the colors identified on the elevation
drawings submitted for site plan review All exterior surfaces of the structure(s) shall be colored
and the color name, associated color code and manufacturer identified The type of exterior
surface material shall also be identified on the drawing The colored elevation drawings shall
have compass direction or title of the side of the building identified The title block of the original
drawing shall be shown The maximum size is 24" by 36" Do not submit on board of any kind
5 Submit color samples as an example of the proposed colors Each sample shall have attached
a label that identifies the color by name, color code and manufacturer The colors should be
referenced from an established color chart.
6 Submit 8 1/2" x 11" transparencies of the site plan, landscape plan and project signs to be used
on an overhead projector at board meetings
~.J1J1
ioo
=-:;) j
-' '-
\1f7' r-
\v, , :
\~ I oj:! ~f ~lJpervisors
C. rnle~ Weaver
'rmitDell
-; Jo , orth III
_vI
a IManager
W iam Winters
isla Manager
Ronald . Crone
Allorney
Perry & Schone. PA
@ ~ U
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
February 19, 1997
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
13081 MILITARY TRAIL
DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA 33484
Tambri J Heyden, AICP
Director Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
-h~ (~
e~J,- ,4d;1
j;~
Dear Ms. Heyden.
Subject:
Technical Review Committee Agenda
1
ll~J,...f' 'j
(I .... ~
Hampton Inn at Quantum Park - No objection. However, a dramage reVIew will
be reqUIred pnor to commencement of construction.
2. Crystal Key at Woolbnght Place, PUD - No objection. However, a dramage
review will be required pnor to commencement of constructIOn.
f~*':- 3
c:~
'\ I As always, we thank you for bemg gIven the opportunity to comment.
Cedar RIdge Tract S - No obJectIOn.
Smcerely,
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
~~
ChIef Inspector
SJW /mfb
c Patrick A. Martm, P.E., DIstnct Engmeer, LWDD
Delray Beach & Boca Raton (561) 498-5363. Boynton Beach & West Palm Beach (561) 737 3835 . Fax (561) 495-9694
/iLL
/1'\
AJW5r"J _ktc
rn
FEB I 8 1997
ill
....
rn@rn~wrn
Richard W Carlson, Jr , Esq.
2377 Crawford Court
Lantana, FL 33462-2511
Phone (561) 433-0172
Telecopier (561) 433-0874
PlANNING AND
ZONING DEft
February 15, 1997
Tambri Heyden, AICP, Planning & Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-0310
Re Quantum Park, Lot 1 - Hampton Inn Boynton Beach, Florida - Accessory Restaurant
Dear Tambri.
I have reviewed the Land Development Regulations Boynton Beach, Florida (f1LDR'sfl)
relative to the interpretation that the detached restaurant proposed for the Hampton Inn on
Lot 1 of Quantum Park requires an amendment to the approved Master Plan I understand
from our conversation of last week that this interpretation was made by the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council. You did not indicate what affect the LDR's have on the issue
You indicated that if the restaurant were attached to the hotel units, it would be considered
as part and parcel of the hotel use and an amendment to the master plan would not be
necessary The hotel use is provided on the Quantum Park Master Plan for Lot 1
As a result of this interpretation that the detached restaurant is not accessory to the
hotel and the time constraint relative to getting the hotel units under way for the next season,
my client has elected not to include a restaurant as part of the submittal to the City at this
time Absent that delay, it would be included This site and facility functions best with a
detached restaurant. It is not feasible to include it as part of the hotel-unit-portion of the
facility
I spoke with James Willard, Esq , relative to the detached restaurant being included
in the next amendment to the master plan Jim informs me that the next amendment will be
submitted this month He informs me the amendment is intended to provide for a flexible
development matrix and will specifically include the restaurant on Lot 1 He informed me that
at the recent meeting involving you and the Regional Planning Council there was no
substantive objection to the detached restaurant on Lot 1 The only concern is the procedural
question of approving it. He also informed me that there is adequate traffic capacity for the
hotel use with the detached restaurant.
At this time I don't know the basis for the Regional Planning Council staff
interpretation that the detached restaurant requires an amendment. I have not spoken to
them I find no basis in the LDR's for the notion that it is not accessory to, or part and
parcel of, the hotel, whether the restaurant is attached or detached I understand from our
rf
1
-"
conversation last week that the Regional Planning Council staff says there is no need for any
amendment to the Master Plan if the restaurant were attached to the hotel.
The LDR's define "accessory use" as.
A use that is customarily incidental to the principal use and so necessary or
commonly to be expected that it cannot be supposed that these regulations
intended to prevent it. Accessory uses, unless otherwise provided, shall be
.Jocate~,~~..!~,~_~~me_~~~mis~~~~._th~ ,~~incipal _use
"Accessory building or structure" is defined as.
>>\\~~)
{~ \
\;\ \\
A detached, subordinate building, the use of which is clearly incidental and
related to that of the principal building or use of the land, and which is located
~ the same I~ as that of the princip~1 bui~~ing or use
~-r~e:(5 - J~'/'rrr.. t S .r~',!:!Jc-k.(
It is axiomatic that hotels have restaurants. A restaurant is customarily incidental to
the principal use and so necessary or commonly expected that I cannot conceive the LDR's
intended that a restaurant not be included as an inherent part of a hotel use In this instance,
the restaurant, being detached, is clearly an accessory structure It is clearly incidental and
related to the hotel-unit building and is located on the same premises.
______-- ..L l, ~. K?-J.,., f\. i ~ M + v- h1 Je./ a,yrj-
Finally, the LDR's define "hotel apartment" as 4-"",-",.,1' 'v _ -rl. r I .
,VUj If rvr~~
Any hotel building containing a mixture of sleeping rooms and apartment suites' ,j h
for transient guests only, and which shall not serve as the primary or permanent
residence of the occupants. * * * * Dining rooms and lounges shal~J>_~ permitted
as accessorv uses *.:f: * * --
..._______---....:-....l.--,-.~~ -"-----
(euM r-e.LA
The restaurant use clearly fits within this definition, and there is no prohibition in this
definition or elsewhere in the LDR's against the restaurant being detached ~
A review of the Quantum Park Development Orders reveal tlnfft'lle restaurant use,
either as a part of a hotel use or otherwise, is part of the approval. What is critical to the
question of whether a master plan must be amended to identify the use is the fact that while
restaurant uses are in the approval, they are not shown on the Master Pian
Note the "Approved Copy" stamped "Received Dec 9 1996, Planning and Zoning Dept"
shows no restaurant use on any lot anywhere in the entire development. This is the case for
all the previous Master Plans approved by the City Yet at least as far back as 1986,
restaurant uses were clearly approved by the City
Ordinance 86-11 addressed restaurant uses The application approved by Ordinance
86-11 is attached to Ordinance 86-11 as Exhibit B. It provides at page 6
2
The location of commercial parcels along NW 22nd Avenue is a minor departure
from the internal 'Lakeside Center' complex originally contemplated that
indicated only 800 feet of commercial frontage on NW 22nd Avenue The
current plan, excluding the Club, now provides for 2,800 feet of commercial
frontage Based upon marketing requirements and the need to establish strong
restaurant and service retail locations within the Park, the land-use has been ~}b., .
specified accordingly * * * * \ / \
Hotel uses have been noted as alternate uses for office use parcels located on \~'"
both the eastern and western terminus of NW 22nd Avenue (emphasis added) / 'y .~.
Again, the Master Plan approved by Ordinance 86-11 does not specifically identify restaurant 'vv'
uses anywhere on the plan Accordingly, one must ask where they may be placed ~O'\ ~
As is recognized in the LDR's, a food service establishment is integral to hotels '; . ~
'In 9""-
irrespective of whether they are identified as a specific use on a site designate "hotel", or l' , , ~
whether they are attached or detached Because the Master Plan does not specifically identify ~'\.
restaurants as an approved use on any lot and because the text of the approval in Ordinance U' J
86-11 includes restaurants along NW 22nd Avenue, it is reasonable to conclude that the ~
detached restaurant use as part of the hotel site is consistent with the review and .\'0
recommendation of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the approval of the ~
CjlY_r-Clearly restaurants were contemplated along NW 22nd Avenue in 1986 and are ' ;
_ contemplated there today No amendment to the Master Plan is necessary Vj ~
N.! ~_ If at some later date the City or Regional Planning Conncil wanls to identify restanrant -~
"'\ ' . uses specifically on given lots, my client has no objection As I have emphasized previously, ./"-' J..Y7I'
this hotel must be under construction in April 1997 to ensure it will go forward My goal is t <)
to avoid any unnecessary processes that could result in delay or costs. S ~
J It._
j;11.Prf:
5f"l f
~
Please advise at your earliest convenience whether in your opinion a master plan
amendment is necessary under the LDR's of the City or the approved Master Plan It would
certainly be beneficial to both my client and the City if the restaurant were permitted to
proceed now rather than having to wait for the Master Plan amendment to be approved under
the application to be filed by Mr Willard
I look forward to discussing this further with you and the Regional Planning Council
staff
Sincerely,
a t~t~--
Richard W Carlson, Jr , Esq
c Boynton Beach Hospitality, Inc.
George F White, AlA
James Cheroff, City Attorney
James Willard, Esq
Mike Busha, AICP, Director, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
3
~e f~~~
South FlorIda "Water Management District
330] Gun Cluh Road, West Palm Beach, Flonda 33406. (56]) 686-8800. FL WATS 1-800-432-2045
February 7, 1997
---..., r'
..,-"-- ~;, It
r<~\ \~ \'1 '.._
-\ ?---..-.
\, \ ;-:--
~ \ '\ \. ? 8 \C\C\ {
Quantum Associates
2455 East Sunnse Blvd, SUIte 1106
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33304
Boynton Park of Commerce aka Quantum Park
Phase Construction Completion/Construction Certification
Application Nos. 08296-D & 11207-F, SWM Permit No. 50-01503-S
Palm Beach County, SI6,17,20,211T45SIR43E
i_ l@ rn ~i. rn
\~U~. ~ 3 llOOl
1
ill
Dear Sir or Madam
Subject
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
TIus letter acknowledges receipt of an engmeer's Construction CompletIOn/Construction Certification,
record draw lOgs and an As-Built Master Drainage Plan from Santiago Malavasl, P E of ROSSI and
Malavasl Engmeers, Inc pertainmg to the subject project's surface water management system District
staff have revIewed the submitted mformatlon and It has been mcorporated mto the permIt file
Per the referenced certification, our staff consIder the Master Surface Water Management System
(including 8-onsite interconnected lakes totalling 67.81 acres, 6.92 acre dry detection area and 3-
discharge control structures serving the entire 578.3 acre industrial development) and the Surface
Water Management System for the Backbone Roadways at the Quantum Park project constructed
10 conformance WIth the permit. ThiS satIsfies the reqUIrement of the referenced surface water
management permIt With regard to constructIon of the surface water management system and statement
of completion and certIficatIon by a FlOrIda registered professional engineer for the phases rncluded
10 the above referenced apphcatIOn numbers
Furthermore, according to the Rules of the South FlOrIda Water Management District, Rule 40E-l and
40E-4, Florida Administrative Code (40E-l 6107, Transfer of EnVIronmental Resource, Surface
Water Management or Water Use Permit, 40E-4 351, Transfer of Permits, 40E-4 61, COnVtrSlOn from
ConstructIon Phase to OperatIOn Phase, and 40E-4 81, General COnditIOns), upon constructIon
completion and certification of the surface water management system, the permittee shall request
transfer of the permit to the responsible operatmg entity Therefore, the subject phase of the Quantum
Park project and the phase previously certIfied by engrneer for constructIOn completIOn (Quantum Park
of Boynton Beach, Lots 12,13,14) shall be transferred to the entIty responsible for operation and
marntenance of the water management system.
The reqUIred transfer should be made Via the enclosed transfer form ThiS form should be filled out
and submItted, along with a copy of the recorded deed restrictiOns (mcludrng amendments, if any), as
well as a copy of all recorded plats (If not previously furniShed) It will then be processed and
included in the DIStrict's permit finalization process Please be aware that the permIt file must contam
documentatIon that applIcable conditIons to the permIt have been satiSfied
Go...crmng B&t1ui.
Valene Bm'd. Chamnan
Frank \Nilham,<m Ir ViCf Ch;mman
\VillIam E. Graham
\Vilham Hammond
BftS\' "'-rant
RlChard A l\1achek
Eugene K. Peltl,
Nathaniel P Reed
MIrIam Smger
Samuel E Poole III ExecutIve Dlfector
J\11chael Sla\"ton, Deput\ ExeclltJ\'C Dlrectnr
Mailing Addms: POBox 24680 West Palm Beach. FL 33416-4680
Quantum Associates
February 7, 1997
Page 2
Please submit the above or notIfy District staff wlthm thirty (30) days of the date of thIS letter Should
you have any questions, please contact Ms Marissa Cruz, Staff Engmeering Associate, at (561) 687-
6590, or the undersIgned at (561) 687-6596
Sincerely, I
...--) fl.
( i2tl~
~-
~~d A. Azizi
Staff Engineer
Field Engineering Division
South Florida Water Management DIStrict
AHA
Enclosure
c. Santiago Malavasi, P E., Rossi and Malavasi Engmeers, Inc. w/Enclosure
Quantum Associates, Indianapolis, IN, w/Enclosure
Catalfumo Management & Investment, Inc, w/Enclosure
Southern DesIgn Group, Inc.
City of Boynton Beach Engineer
Palm Beach County Engineer
FDE.P
E.P A.
L.W D D
bc B RatclIffe
H Schloss/M Cruz
Permit File
r-.
! I ~,
-i
qfU City of
'Boynton 'Beacli
'-
100 'E. 'lJoynton 'lJeadi 'lJoufevard
PO 'lJ~310
'lJoynton 'lJeadt., :Jforufa. 33425-0310
City:J{aJ[ (561) 375-6000
:J5tX. (561) 375-6090
February 5, 1997
George F White AI.A & Associates, Inc
5455 North Federal Hwy , Suite F
Boca Raton, Florida 33487
RE Hampton Inn at Quantum Park - NWSP 97-001
Acceptance - New Site Plan & Submittal Documents
New Site Plan
Dear George A White
On January 24, 1997, your submittal for New Site Plan approval for the above-referenced
project was reviewed for completeness It has been determined that the submittal is
substantially complete and accepted for further processing Jerzy Lewicki, within the
department will be reviewing and coordinating your application through the remainder of the
New Site Plan approval process and can be contacted if you have questions
The next step in the review process IS for the Technical Review Committee to review the
submittal for compliance with the review standards identified in Part III, Land Development
Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 and all applicable sections of the
Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances The Technical Review Committee (TRC) will meet on
February 18, 1997 to discuss the first review comments We understand that the review
schedule will be further determined after this meeting
If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (561) 375-6260
Very truly yours,
/-:' ..., I ,7
~fl~tt'1'l I~ J40jt&~
Tambri J Heyden,AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
TJH bme
d:\sharelprojectslhampton\1 slaepl!r wpd
~~n.cas (jateway to tlit (julfstream