Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE " .. ~. /- t~ ...:::.. ~~ ~ . ~.~ ~ " i~~ ~ t'{ \1", ~ 11 ~ ~ ~, ~\\ ~ '}.{ ~ . ~ ~ ~~" ~ ~ 01 i '~\ .~~~ ; t ~ ~Ji Gj .n ~ \. -\- ~ "Ii<.~ ~~ ~ \; \~-~ J l~ f ",- ~ L7 G' \I ~ \~ ~ ~ '\~ 1,~ ~'1 ~ tl~b ~. ~ ~ ~~. 1 A;' . ~ ~ ~ ~~, ~ <\t ~ ~ ~ ~ Ii.. ~ ~ ~~~ ~.,::::: ~ it "J. of ~ I) ~ \u ~ '\;0 *~fO ~ -...;; \. )... ~ .IJ ~ ~ ~ ~) j '-.1 ,~ , \ ""' ~ ~ ~ t-i:~ "l "t: ~'f ~. .~ ~ .~ ~ '-' ,~ ::I <::-; ~ ;:) ~ ;') ,~ ~ ~ " '- ~ ~ ~ '-l ~ : x.. \~ ~ ~ ~ . Q \II -..J --.j ~ ~ '\J \~ 'J \J -J""J 'I ~ ~ ~ ~! ~ L R \J ...... '!) ..: ~ ~ ...' '<;l. ~ ""\ ~ \'J \.~- "- ~ '- I" <> ~~ Iv":, ~ ~\ r, ~ .~ .." ...... , ~ '-' < ~ ~ K ~ X. ~ \..) ~~ " $t ~ ~ .~ ~. ~~ ~ , \'\ ~ \\.1 \~ ~ ~ ~ '" .$' \ / /?l~o CT ~,~ /{/V/r. 0~2/ --L O/)/L)/ ~ \~~ \ ~ 06 30/95 10 03 FAX 1. 40'" I 471 1201 . ~ 001/001 (9 fr~ f ~~ ~ t ~ J, ~ ~J ''1 ~ ~ ... , :f-~ cp rr-~ ~ rN · ~ 1 l -y- ."0 ~ C'ATALFUfO co S I N Cl ! " ~~ ~ ~ 0 ~ {>-' ~: r _. :J ~ _ ~v'l~ ~ ~ ~ --0- cr-- (\ - oR- ~ rtJ i~. 1-J ,~ t ~ ~) ~ ~ f ' / ~ ~ _'-- 0 III \) ~ 240 A ~ F " _ Lr ~ - "'t-K~' ~ ~ S l=1- " ~ ~ ~j~ t J in~ 1-""- I ct ~ l ~ ~ 3 J . \; ~ -O~ Vl ~ 1:1 rr, f /rY( 5 SPACES - / ;?STAs,c~f SITE A' TRIANG LE ~ 1/7~~ ~1 . ~ ;;:Ji ~ \ SO 1 - r- = ~--'tJ~.' = = = ~ I~_ _ n" - - -~ ... ~ <d-~~ - - di.m - -'~€~" . t ~ ~ s-:I: o~G'i ~ ~I~ ~w .? fK 1 / I ! ~i ~,- --- : ~. .;> V'. c' i :;;z !ls''':- I :GrJ I F;) 1=1 ~I ~l 'Ilie City of 'Boynton 13eac/i Planmng & ZoTUng 'Department 100 E. 'Boynton 'Beadi. 'Boulr&ICUa P.O Bo{.31O 'Boynton 'Beach. ~foruia JJ425.{}JlO (407)375-6260. FAX (407)375-6090 FAX TR.ANSMI~.AL CC)'V .I:!a<. LE-~ -..cER. DATE: ) v~ ~ l ll~ If S" FAX NUMBER TRANSMITTING TO: Lfo 7 - ~ II - I L... 0 , NUMBER OF PAGES BEING TRANSMITTED: (Including Cover Letter) al- TO: Se. -9f L \s ~~ ~ C9s-\.o FROM: RE: p\b ~\J\~~ q~ ~9W~\o-b Sent By: C.FAX.JM Clmencas gateway to the (juifstream 57 3 Physical character of the site The site shall be suitable for development in the manner proposed without hazards to persons or property, on or off the tract, from probability of flooding, erosion, or other dangers, annoyances, or inconveniences Condition of the soil, groundwater level, drainage and-topography shall all be appropriate to both kind and pattern of use intended p\~ ~es'<i " C C' ..\0Jt4 "a.. H DESIGN CRITERIA 1 paving All interior paving shall comply with specifications and standards set forth and subject to the approval of the development director 2 Off-street parking One and one-half (11/2) parking spaces shall be provided for each two (2) employees on a maximum shift In addition, visitor parking shall be provided which is deemed adequate to serve the needs of the particular use by the planning and development board 3 Accessways In the interest of public safety, no more than two (2) accessways shall be permitted on to any single perimeter public right-of-way and interior accessways shall be limited to no more than two (2) per developable parcel and interior accessways shall be located no closer than one hundred and fifty (150) feet from center line to center line 4 Hotel and motel density Permitted density for hotel and motel development shall not exceed twenty (20) units per acre 5 Utility transmission lines, etc All utility transmission lines, conduits, conveyances or other devices or apparatus for the transmission of utility services and products, including all franchised utilities, shall be constructed and installed beneath the surface of the ground with the exception of main overhead feeder lines Appurtenances to these systems which require aboveground installation shall be effectively screened, and, thereby, may be excepted from this requirement 6 Solid waste and refuse disposal Plans for solid waste and refuse disposal shall conform to and be approved by the city and county health departments 7 Sanitary sewage system Sewage system will be furnished and installed in accordance with city standards and other pertinent city ordinances Adop~ed April 4 1"5 Ordinance 0'5 OZ 2-63 ReVl..d S7 8 Public water system for both domestic use and fire protection Water systems must be installed in accordance with city standards and other pertinent city ordinances 9 Storm water system When approved positive drainage is not available, an-site containment of storm water run-off shall be provided by the developer Details of the on-site system shall be ap~roved by the development director 10 Access to perform necessary public services The developer and/or owner shall dedicate to city any easement that city deems necessary for public services and said dedication shall provide that developer and/or owner shall hold city harmless for any of its acts performed within or abutting said easements if any loss or damage is caused to abutting property 11 Off-street loading In no instance shall off-street loading facilities front on a public right-of-way and in no event shall these facilities be located within eyesight of residential district 12 Plot coverage The gross floor area of the building and its accessory structures shall not exceed sixty per cent (60') of the plot on which it is constructed 13 Open space Each plot to be developed shall contain a minimum of twenty per cent (20') unobstructed, nonvehicular open space All open portions of any lot shall have adequate grading and drainage, and shall be continuously maintained in a dust-free condition by suitable landscaping with trees, shrubs or planted ground cover The design of such landscaping and the measures taken to insure its maintenance shall be subject to the approval of the planning and development board 14. Maximum building height No building or appurtenances thereof shall exceed forty-five (45) feet in height 15 Distance between buildings No building shall be constructed closer than twenty-five (25) feet to another principal building on the same lot or parcel of land 16 District setbacks Pront, thirty (30) feet, side, twenty (20) feet, rear, thirty (30) feet. Adopted Apr11 4 1"5 Ord1nance 0'5 02 ltev1aed 2-64 57 17 Peripheral greenbelt The project area shall be enclosed on all sides with the exception of accessways for traffic and freight by a landscaped area with a minimum width of twenty-five (25) feet except when such property abuts a residential district such greenbelt shall have a minimum width of forty (40) feet It shall be the responsibility of the owner or developer to carry out this requirement, and to provide such maintenance or guarantee of maintenance, subject to planning and development board I PROCEDURES FOR ZONING LAND TO PID The procedure for zoning land to the PID classification shall be the same as for zoning land generally Because of the differences in PID developments and the concept of unified control in development, the following procedures and requirements shall apply to applications for zoning to the PIn classification in addition to the general requirements 1 Applications, materials to be submitted In addition to information required for application for zoning generally, the applicant shall submit the following materials or data a Legal documents assuring unified control of the proposed PID and the agreements required under subsection D b A master site development plan containing (1) The title of the project and the names of the professional project planner and the developer, (2) Scale, date, north arrow, and general location map, (3) Boundaries of the property involved, all existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements, section lines and other existing important physical features in and adjoining the project; (4) Site plan of locations of land uses including but not limited to industrial areas, greenbelts and proposed rights-of-way, (5) Master plan showing access and traffic flow, and (6) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the development and the percentages thereof to be devoted to the various land uses c Repealed by Ord No 78-37, 5 1 A4opte4 April. 1995 Or4inenee 095 O~ .ev1..d 2-65 F ~ x ~~ ~ NV 1 e,l .1.0 Ott! l\~ fJJie City of 'Boynton 'Beach 7/" I fs- 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'BoufeVQ.t'({ P.O. 'Bo~310 'Boynton 'Bead;', 1"forUia 33425-0310 City:JlafL (407) 375-fj()()() 1".!U. (407) 375-6090 July 10, 1995 Mr Jeff Lis 1540 Latham Road West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 RE Initial Review Comments - Packaging Concepts File No NWSP 95-007 Dear Mr Lis The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first documents submitted for the above-referenced project comments made by the reviewing departments during review of your project review of the Attached are their initial In order to complete the review process, the site plan and documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90 days of the date of this letter (If amended plans are not submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required) When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not applicable to the approval of the project or will be addressed separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment stating why the comment is not applicable and return the explanation with the amended plans and documents After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12) complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the planning and Zoning Department When the amended plans and documents have been submi tted to the Planning and Zoning Department, they will be distributed to the reviewing departments for second review and recommendation to the appropriate boards for approval or denial (see attached meeting schedule) A recommendation for denial will be made if there are major comments that have not been addressed on the resubmitted plans We have also enclosed for your convenience an approval schedule and a checklist that contains information regarding the second submission of the plans and documents for review ~merUas (jateway to tlit (juifstream Page 2 Packaging Concepts First Review of Second Submittal Comments If you should have any questions regarding the comments or the approval schedule, please feel free to call Michael E Haag, who is coordinating the review of your site plan for the Planning and Zoning Department Director TJH dim Atts A lBtCoJlLt.r LoD MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-217 00' t mowrn 11..-6 in~ ill . ! ! ' ~I FROM. John A. GuIdry, DIrector ofUtihties .~v P/;jNNiJr- ~"""""---?:- TO Tambn J Heyden, Planmng & Zorn Date July 3, 1995 SUBJECT Packaging Concepts, New Site Plan, First Review of 2nd Submittal Staff has reViewed the above referenced project and offer the follOWing comments 1 A CapacIty ReservatIon Fee will be reqUired withm tlurty (30) days of City CorrumsslOn approval. The fee amount will be detemuned based upon meter Size or expected demand, (Sec. 26-34 [ED 2 Please proVide expected maXimum water demand for SIZIng of water meter, plan shows a 2" water service and a l"water meter 3 Please show eXIstmg or proposed fire hydrant location (s) Fire hydrants shall be Within 200' of all pomts on every commercIal building, (Appendix C, Art. X, Sec. 16) 4 Proposed relocation of Bay Trees onto eXIstmg utihtIes and mto a RIght of Way IS not acceptable, (Sec 7 5-18 1) It IS our recommendation that the plan proceed through the reView process. If you have any questions regardmg tlus subject, please contact Slap Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404 sm xc Clyde "Slap" Milor Peter Mazzella;;3 - File tIme 1 Assistant to the Director ofUtihtIes. 5hr @ 2567 per hr 2 CluefField Inspector of Utilities 1 Ohr @ 19 16 per hr RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-296 DATE. July 5, 1995 TO Tambn Heyden, Plannmg & Zomng Drrector FROM. , KevIn J Hallahan, Forester/EnvIronmentalIst tJ f~ Packing Concepts - Site Plan RE The comment on the landscape plans addresses any eXIstmg trees on the sIte. The project should contmue on the normal reVIew process No addItional costs to the applIcant for stafftrme. KH.ad BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 95-220 July 6, 1995 TO Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM Al Newbold Deputy Building Official RE TRC COMMENTS - 1st REVIEW OF 2nd SUBMITI'AL NEW SITE PLAN - PACKAGING CONCEPTS - QUANTUM PARK We have reviewed the new set of plans for the above referenced project and the comments we submitted in our memorandum 95-173 (attached) remain the same The cost for this additional review, including 35% for fringe benefits, is $71 17 AN bh Attachment XC William V Hukill, P E PACKAGIN TRC - BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-173 June 6, 1995 To Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director From Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Site Plan Review - Packaging Concepts 4925 Park Ridge Boulevard, Quantum. Park Re This project was reviewed as a 1,000 Sq Ft Office and 23,270 Sq Ft Packaging Building Since no floor plan was submitted, we must advise the applicant that, when the floor plan is submitted more openings such as doors, may be required to comply with the code Other comments are as follows 1 Handicap access route is required for pedestrians, per State Handicap Code 2 All signs should comply with Quantum sign program or be approved with this Site Plan as a standard concept Only one free-standing sign is allowed Details for both the wall and free-standing signs must be submitted 3 4 Al~~ AN mh cc William V Hukill, P E , Department of Development Director A PltGCON TRC PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 95-307 FROM Tambri J Heyden Planning and zonin~ ~tor Michael E Ha::Y~ ([- Site and ZOning~IOpment Administrator June 30, 1995 TO DATE SUBJECT Site plan Project Location Applicant File No Review - 1st Review (New Site Plan) "Packaging Concepts Assoc Inc" 4925 Park Ridge Boulevard, Quantum Park Jeff Lis NWSP 95-007 The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced project It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories, the first category is a list of comments that identifies deficiencies from the city' s land development regulations (L DR) that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review, in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process The second set of comment(s) are recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development The applicant shall understand that all documents/plans submitted for site plan and/or permit review are subj ect to additional comments I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies and they request that the project remain on the review schedule identified in the attached letter, they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement I SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. 1 On the survey, add to the map legend a symbol that represents the property line of the subject property It appears the project site is part of a larger lot or lots 2 The set of plans have two drawings labeled site plan Re-title the plans accordingly 3 Please be advised that the property dimensions as shown on the "Boundary Survey dated May 22, 1995, drawn by Lidberg Land Survey Inc " do not match the boundary dimensions of the subject property as shown on the Palm Beach County Tax Map (1994) Contact the Engineering Division of the Development Department regarding the procedures to follow in subdividing land 4 For clarity in determining compliance with required setbacks, identify on the site plan (Drawing D95-222), sheet 1 or 1) that the north side (facing Park Ridge Boulevard) is the front of the property [L DR, Chapter 2 - Zoning, section 7 H 16 ] 5 A clearance of eighteen (18) feet is required at the ingress to diagonal parking spaces The 18 feet dimension shall be identified from the ingress side of the first diagonal parking space to the entrance to the ingress access aisle where the diagonal parking spaces are located [L DR, Chapter 23 - Parking Lots, Article II, section H 4 ] 6 Identify the narrowest width of the landscape strip proposed along the north property line, excluding the two (2) feet required for the eighteen (18) foot long parking space Note The minimum width of a landscape strip bordering a public right-of-way is five (5) feet, not Page 2 Site plan Review/1st Review "Packaging Concepts Assoc Inc II File NWSP 95-007 Memorandum No 95-307 including two (2) feet of grass space that is part of an eighteen (18) foot long parking space [L DR, Chapter 7 5, Article II - Landscape Code, section 5 A & D and city standard drawing B-90012] 7 The length of the ninety (900) degree parking spaces, shown along the north property line of the project are identified as sixteen (16) feet overall, and included within the dimensioned area are wheel stops Therefore, the dimension from the wheelstops to the entrance of the parking space is fourteen (14) feet The minimum distance allowed for this area is sixteen (16) feet Amend the plans accordingly Also, extend the symbol that represents the two (2) foot portion of the parking space that is over a grass strip along all spaces that are shown sixteen (16) feet long (City Standards Drawing B-90012 and B-90013) 8 There is an inconsistency in the dimensions as provided within both typical handicap parking stall drawings and the dimensions as provided on the site plan at the handicap parking stall The "typical" provides an overall dimension of eighteen point five (18 5) feet and the site plan is providing an overall dimension of eighteen (18) feet Please correct this inconsistency on the plans (City Standards Drawing B-90012 and B-90013) (Please note, when making corrections to the plans, the minimum dimensions for all ninety (900) degree and forty- five (450) degree parking stalls is 9 O' wide by and 18 O'long) 9 wi thin the landscaping requirements for this proj ect there is no requirement for interior landscaping Please delete all references on the plans to "interior landscape required" 10 On the site plan, identify the width and length of all interior landscape islands Also, dimension the narrowest width of the landscape strip located along the west side of the north parking area Note The minimum width of the required landscape strip along abutting property is two point five (2 5) feet [L D R Chapter 7 5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5 E ] 11 Add the following notes to the general notes found on the plan that shows landscaping i On center spacing of required landscape material shall take precedence over quantities of material identified on the plan ii Fifty (50%) percent of the total number of required trees and shrubs required to comply with the code shall be a native specie [Comprehensive Plan Policy 4 4 6 Native Specie Requirement and Chapter 7 5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5 C 3 ] 12 Revise the last general note on the landscape plan and the "substitutions" note on the landscape detail plan as follows All plant substitutions shall be approved by the City of Boynton Beach Page 3 Site Plan Review/1st Review "Packaging Concepts Assoc Inc" File NWSP 95-007 Memorandum No 95-307 13 On the landscape plan and plant list provide a distin- guishable symbol that represents the location and/or specie of the trees and hedges required to form the continuous barrier to screen the vehicle use area and the accent shrubs to screen the dumpster enclosure Place a typical dimension on the plan that represents the forty (40) foot on center spacing for the required trees along the right-of-way NOTE Fifty (50%) percent of the total number of trees and hedges required to comply with the code shall be a native specie and the minimum height at planting for trees is eight (8) feet [Comprehensive Plan Policy 4 4 6 Native Specie Requirement) and L D R Chapter 7 5, Article II Landscape Code, Section 5 C 2 and D ] 14 Identify the trees shown on the landscape plan on the plant list 15 Correct the discrepancy between the spacing of the required hedge landscape material identified in the landscape notes found on the landscape plan and the spacing identified on the plant list found on the landscape detail plan Note The maximum spacing of the hedge material required to form the continuous barrier to screen the vehicle use area is two (2) feet on center L D R Chapter 7 5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5 C 3 , D and E ] 16 To avoid a conflict between the location of landscape material and the site lighting poles, pedestrian lighting, fire hydrants, drainage structures and other site appurtenances, show and label these improvements on the landscape plan, where applicable Also specify the overall height of the proposed site lighting poles 17 To properly evaluate the number of required parking spaces for this proposed use, please indicate on the parking data identified on the site plan the maximum number of shift hour employees 18 please provide the following architectural plans as they have not been submitted and, therefore, not included within this first review a) Scaled floor plans for the proposed structure indicating the use within each space Also identify the number of stories tall the building is and whether there is a mezzanine b) Exterior elevations for the proposed structure indicating building height from finish grade to highest point on the building, exterior colors by color name, color number or designation and manufacture I s name, and identify the type of all exterior materials c) Submit color samples (chips) matching the colors identified on the plans and submit colored elevation drawing showing all elevations of the building (where applicable) with the colors matching the colors specified on the plans [L D R Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7 D 1 & 2 and Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 5 ] Page 4 site Plan Review/1st Review rrpackaging Concepts Assoc Inc" File NWSP 95-007 Memorandum No 95-307 19 Show and dimension on the landscape plan the safe sight triang~es required by the zoning code and landscape code The trlangles are required on both sides of each ingress/ egress and on the site at the intersection of Park Ridge Boulevard and Beta Drive Also specify, in note form, on the plans the unobstructed, cross visibility space required within the line-of-sight triangles [L DR, Chapter 7 5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5 H and Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 4 E J 20 Relocate the hedge material along the north property line to outside of the two (2) foot grass area which is part of the parking space Also, relocate all the trees that are shown in easements See general note on landscape plan [City standard drawing B-90012] 21 On the dumpster detail drawing found on the site plan, specify that the color of the stucco walls will match the color of the building and identify the color of the gate screening [L DR, Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 10 E ] 22 Submit for review building and site signage in compliance with the sign code and the Quantum sign program [L DR, Chapter 21 and Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 10 I] 23 The proposed use is being evaluated for consistency with the permitted uses allowed within the development and compliance with city codes 24 Relocate the loading area so that it does not front on a public road [L DR, Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 7 H 11 ] 25 Show on the site plan and elevation view drawings of the building, the location of the mechanical equipment proposed to be attached to the building or installed on the site, such as electrical transformers, roof top mechanical equipment Also, show on the appropriate plan the type, size, spacing and color of the material required to screen the equipment [L DR, Chapter 9, section 11 E] 26 Additional fees will be charged for the first review of second submittal II RECOMMENDATIONS 27 It is recommended that the cypress mulch be changed to melalueca mulch MEH arw a latPllck Con BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT ~r .)r~~. i i~l .,2 Nf, j~~ ID'~~ TO' FROM. DATE. REF T AMBRI HEYDEN PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 26 JUNE 95 PACKAGING CONCEPTS MEMO #0149 I have revIewed the above lIsted sIte pl~ll"~l1d";firi'(f?n(t:itnm,~~l.a.J~. problems or concerns at thIS tIme. .: :" Respect. fully, '. ~. J #/)l.~ Sgt. Marlon Harris PolIce Department ./ PZLANNING ANO ONING DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-106 mr ~" ~ ~ ~c ~lrn' i . . - ~ 1 TO Tambn J Heyden, Planmng & Zomng DIrector FROM Robert EIchorst, Pubhc Works DIrector SUBJ SIte Plan RevIew - Packagmg Concepts ~S.i DATE June 26, 1995 In reference to the above sIte the southern most parkmg space should be ehmmated to allow safe backmg of the Samtatlon vehIcles. If you have any questIOns contact Robert EIchorst, Pubhc Works DIrector at 375-6201 ~ -, . ~ f' / )v. . . ~ / Robert EIchorst Pubhc Works DIrector REI cr MEMORANDUM ....~ , - iJ~;J i LV PW1~W8E1!f.O (JJ.k TO 1'4~13i1...1 Ilcybt"..), fI.A;v~uif-C t 2D,V'''';(, h(Rec-rot'~ FROM -S of/iV \,J, '- \)"'''-1', f'Mk> S ~pr ~ DATE tv / ') f /1 j/ RE Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans Project U?Ac~/tcPfC ~7"y"j-K~~ After reviewing the referenced project Department recommends the Planning and consideration amended plans for the above the It L C'~ li-A It J. /'" 4 r AIZ k.J that the project be forwarded to Development Board for their This department will not be required to sign-off the permit documents associated with the subject project C AMENDl ALD ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-199 DATE. June 22.1995 (revised 6/30/95 on resubmittal). TO. T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. ) FROM. KEN HALL, ENG AIDE PHONE 407-375-6283~ SUBJECT. PACKAGING CONCEPTS - 1st REVIEW The followmg comments/recommendatIOns are submItted for your revIew If any of the code comments dIsallow the applIcant to develop the sIte as submItted, the applIcant may request an exemptIOn thru the plannmg department as stIpulated III Chapter one, ArtIcle one, SectIon eleven of the CIty'S Land Development RegulatIOns All plans submItted for specIfic permIts shall meet the CIty'S code reqUIrements at tIme of apphcatIon. These permIts mclude, but are not IUnIted to the followmg: SIte IIghtmg, Pavmg, Dramage, Curbmg, Landscapmg, IrngatIon, and Traffic Control DeVIces. PermIts requITed from agenclcs such as the F DOT P.B County SF W M D , and any other permlttmg agency shall bc mcluded WIth your permIt request. COMMENTS 1 On east side of building, correct parking stall dimensions to agree with Citv standard drawing B-90013 2 Provide a sati.~factorv trqDic control plan as required Chap 23 Art. lIB, pg 23-7 3 Provide a certified drainage plan including calculations and details/i'om a Florida registered engineer Chap 23 Art IIF pg 23-8 4 Parcel requires replatting unless an exemption can be obtained Fom the Citv Engineer Chap5 Art. II Sect. 1 (Lot 47 has alreadv been subdivided four times) 5 Maximum width of east drivewav shall be 32 feet unless otherwise approved bv the Director of Development. Chap 23 Art.IIHI 6 ReVIse the parkmg dunensIons to reflect the CIty'S standards along the east parkmg area. Chap 23, Art. 21, pg. 23-8 RECOMMENDATIONS J Consider extending sidewalk along north parking stalls two feet out to act as a continuous wheel stop It eliminates tripping lza~ards associated with wheel stops and their maintenance packagmg concepts first reVIew contd. pg. 2 2 ConsIder nme foot wIde parkmg stalls If It WIll Increase number of parkmg spaces. KRH/krh C Wilham Hukill, Dev Drr and to file. pkgcncpt.lrv TO FROM DATE RE FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO 95-2B3 W planning Department L Fire Department June 23, 1995 Packaging Concepts 4925 Park Ridge Blvd NWSP 95-007 Provide fire hydrants at 1 The corner of Park Ridge Blvd and Beta Drive p/ m~ :;~ ~'mi PLANNING t,ND . tv ZONiNG DEPT. 2 S E corner of the property south of loading dock drive Please be advised plan review by William D cavanaugh 1 5 hrs @ $24 OB/hr x 35% = total $48 76 4:7f::ta~~,~ '-- \J. 100 'E. 'lJoynton 'BeDdi. tJ30ukvatYf P.O. ~310 tJ3oynton tJ3eadr., 110ritfa 33425-0310 City:JIaIL (4fJ7) 375..(i()()() !FJifX. (407) 375-6090 September 11, 1995 Jeff Lis The Catalfumo Companies 1540 Latham Road West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Re Packaging Conceptes Property Location 4925 Park Ridge Road File No NWSP 95-007 Dear Mr Lis The attached package.. will be presented to the Planning and Development Board on september 12, 1995 (see attached agenda) and then to the City Commission the following week (September 19/ 1995) The applicant must understand that the permit plans shall be amended to comply with the final determination of the request and that additional comments may be generated by staff following their review for technical compliance of permit documents that are required to be submitted for development of the project For the applicant's convenience, attached is a list of documents required for permit submittal An approval of the site plan by the City Commission shall be valid for one ( 1 ) year, unless a building permit from the Building Department is secured If the applicant fails to secure a building permit in that time, all previous approvals shall become null and void Very ~ your~, ~e'l E c:& P ning and Zoning Administrator MEH dim attachments xc Central File . P&DpkqltI' PAC !ifmerUa s (jateway to tlU (jutfstream DEPARTh1.EN'T OF DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DMSION 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd POBox 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER August 14, 1995 ~ 00 ~@~owrn.I~! I U.ll . II AUG I 5 1995 l~ Catalfumo 1540 Latham Road West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Attention Jeff Lis Re Packaging Concepts - Replat PLANNING AND ZONING DEPl Dear Mr Lis We have reviewed your request for an exemption to platting As you know, the platting requirements for the City of Boynton Beach were modified and recoded in April in order to make the process more reasonable for applicants The exemption to platting requirements (Chapter 5, Article II, pgs 5-1 & 5-2) were not substantially changed The land depicted on the Lidberg survey is clearly not a simple subdivision of one lot into two parts The statement attributed to Quantum has no basis in current or previous requirements, and is irrelevant I cannot exempt the property from platting because the conditions delineated in Section 1 are not met You may, of course, ap~al to the Planni~_~~9_Dev~lopmen~~oard as outlined ln section 3, page 5-2 That is the bad news The good news is that platting can now be accomplished very quickly See Land Development Regulations Chapter 5, Article V, pgs 5-3 thru 5-9 If you submit a final plat meeting LDR requirements it will be reviewed by staff and submitted to the City Commission If approved by the Commission it can be recorded Time line is totally dependent on an applicant As a courtesy, you may submit a pre-application (Art IV, Sec 2, pg 5-2) if you wish, but that process is to help you and no approvals are either requested or supplled Very truly yours, kpuf ~ · , ~~-tv l~ry~( f CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA d/d~u~~~1 William Hukill, P E City Engineer WVH/ck xc Tambri Heyden, Planning & zoning Dire< Ken Hall, Engineering Aide C.PACKCONC.PL T Phone: (407) 375-6280