The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS " ; \ 1 r JJAJ! I / PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-601 Al Newbold Deputy Building Official ,~ ~.~~ Dan Decar~~~ . . Assistant Planner TO FROM THRU Michael E Haag Zoning and Site Development Administrator DATE' October 17, 1995 SUBJECT Transmittal of Development Orders PACKAGING CONCEPTS Accompanying this memorandum you will find documents regarding development plans that received final approval 1 project Name Type of Application Planning and Zoning Department File No Staff Report and Comments Control Plans Color Elevation Drawings Board of Adjustment Approval Planning and Development Board Approval City Commission Approval Resolution No Ordinance No HEH arw Attachments . 'l"ran..tl Pek Packaq1nq Concepts PACKAGING CONCEPTS New Site Plan NWSP 95-007 22 pages 6 sheets In File N/A 9-12-95 meeting minutes 9-19-95 meeting minutes N/A N/A PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-459 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION september 12, 1995 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT. project Name packaging concepts Applicant P J M and Associates c/o Philip Meshberg Agent Jeff Lis The Catalfumo companies Location 4925 Park Ridge Boulelard (See Exhibit "A") File No NWSP-007 Land Use Plan Designation Industrial (I) Quantum Industrial Park Zoning Designation PID TypE. of Use Des_gn and manufac:i::ure ne\"l !lOn-aen. sol dLo:pensing syst,:>ms (see Exhibi t "B '. ) lJumber of lInt ts N A Square F'ootaqe site 3.rea 31..lll1ing 1 48 3.Cre3 24,158 8q ft Surrounding Land TJSE:S and Zoning District Nor t1- Dark Ridge B)ule' ar~ farthe1 north undevelsfed ir Qlantum In~~strial :.on~d PID "\lFl 1 3.11(1 Park South Undeleloped land Industrial Park in c,uantum zoned P:!:D East Beta Dl-i"e and farther east undeveloped land in Quantum Industrial Park Zoned FID \.J'2St Und,:>veloped land iL Q!anturn Industrial Park, zoned PID E._ir-til1g Site Characteristics Tl e site is partiall} cleared 3nd un~pv~ r nQ~ Proposed Development ManJfactu1ing aetivlties man~facture of non-aerosol _el2.ted t) ':112 spraz dispense~s C')nCU1Tency ~13ffi~ - Ccmments have not yet been 1eeei ed b~ Palm Be3ch C'unty regarding thei1 reV1.evl cf the tl'affic st ldy T'le stld~ indi:3tes that the ploject complies with the Palm Beach ~)~nty Traffic Pe1~0r~ance Etan~a1ds J1 dinance The appl iean t Eo hall ::ompl}- \-ith ani off-site impro.lemellts ::etermined to be ne,::e~s3.ry as p':ll t )f th-= C~OUllty s revi.ew t,lf the :::tLldy f3.ge =. site Plan Reliew staff Peport 11emo!.-andum #95-459 project Name - Packaging Concepts Driveways Parking Facility L~nj,scaping 3uilding and Site Peg _lla tions community Design r'3.1 ~. ignage Drainage - Insufficient drainage information has been submitted for the Engineer- ing Division to certify compliance with the city's drainage levels of service at the time of site plan approval, as required The Engineering Division is recommending that this be postponed to time of permit review Two two-way drives are proposed to serve the facility, one on Park Ridge Boulevard, and a second on Beta Drive The parJing facility will provide thirty six (:6) parking spaces, two more than required (1 1/2 spaces for every 2 employees plus one space per visitor. - 36 employees plus 3 \. isi tOl.-S equal 3C spaces and office reqires ~le space pel 1,)00 square feet which equals ::J'l!. ~pa::es) T11e proposed de'lelopment inclu1es all ~ equirE d minimum landscaping lequired b~ code The prnposed development meets the requiremen ts c f t'1e building and .3 i te legul3.tiol1~ Total site area is 1 48 a"le3 juilding co;~rage is 24,158 square feet ~1 ~q pel ce'1 t of the site and the he ight of the Pl-cposed on2 story building is twenty t\-'1r feet The pr(Jposed ~~tucc.) bui11iag will in cC'lor 'tli th Ca tal fumo ace en t ~lLel in compliance with pre\icusl} establi?hed for Indu3tri~1 PJrk and the city o~ Land Develor:ment 1 eg,llations b~' 1 i :;Jl' t- grp} ::tri1..J (1'0 aL - - req1Ji 1 ~m,=n t S th!::: QUe!l1 tUI1l Boynton Bea.:h ::igr:age t--1:lS net submitted ,-lith appli.:etioll Pla' ning and Zaring :cmments refer to the nge1 fJr futlre signage to be addleS3€1 adninis trat i vel y .3. t time of ;Jenni t re\ ieV! Signage can ~e processed admin_stlatlvel} .-10 id::d it ffi,:et::: the sign code a_leI th", C~mmunity Design plan PEVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS. ELl)~ _~ ~ list ~f tho.:e depaltments that have comments LeJ~ldinJ -:11:= l",-,,-=,t (S'?~ Ed:ibit "(") DEP/l.RTMENT r 1..:. 1 i .: c r)- ~ tTtl.lities ATTACHED MEMORANDUH I1j.!l.. !I .n.. !l A " 5 - ') 1 ) 0 Cl5-19C1 317 ':':-311 fL", r',.ll::e ~ncLllEe!.-i", I;_, i.:::io11 Eu_lding Dij~SlJll Ealt_ & Pecle~ti:n r L~Et~_/EnJircLment~li_t P _ all' ~ 11 '~r a'1::1 ~ C 1 n <;r N A l'! ;' r, 35-472 P20e 3 3ite Plan Feview staff Report Memcrandum .95-459 Project Name - Packaging Concepts The Police, Engineering, BUilding and Planning Departments' comments may be addressed on the permit set of drawings The remaining departments did not have comments regarding their review of the amended plans RECOMMENDATION. The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the permit plans for the project being amended to show compliance with staff comments and the applicable Citi of Boynton Beach code of Ordinance DDC/be ~~ Central File -~p~~ PAC E X H I BIT nAn . bill!, 111.11111' -'_]0,.- ~~__~ , 2: ,~ LO~ATION MAP PACKAGING CONCEPTS 1 j NOT IN CITV ~ IVI'P. -.~~' ~r~:ll rr 1>4 ." 11 -, ,. -J I ,- a . ~ 1--, 1. r- L~ ~ C~ ~ E X H I BIT "B" . I II p 1"1.' 'rllJl; n 1 1111 IJ: t ~ . I i" I J I ~ j I I . --I II I i II!H -~ ! , ~, ! I .... I "~I I...", ". 'i "1 ""'" " - I a --I - ::&1 I I. "- 'II Q' ::; ~~~ m ~~ i i I I ..' ; I IZI .1; l I II +111 il'l:i I I" 111;1: . \ ,. II , II i\ ihl II ~. ~II r. ~I SI \\ \ il ir J ~I I \. II ,I , " il :!. I \ n~ 1 h~ it" ' ~ L. .., III Ii' uln.mUI'r!f JUi I > ;:1 n '" I :: ~ [ ~ l: f 'I nt', 'u, (,I .;', ;I> llll .. III' II Jl U.I,ll~~f l"~ C1 !l ~ tee iU iI a II' I" I ~ ~~lIlllhIUll!tnlh II urll'h '1=III.t I! II i:I'Jiit!,111i iiI I!: Ie '! r.!Gi!f. ;, ~: ;;;~ill,:' i" n ;;11\ eil'j Illfl'lllI'll .i!.1 ~~..' ....'1 1=1 It . ,..' ft ,,. 2 ..... ,t ,f' I, U! !"'i 'I ~: .~ r '"''tu · i. rur"I~" I~I [;j s;tiliih I r!li!l~!!!1 i, ~~ i I~~r.t I 'I II ,tIT III If nn ~, ;r t.. g , ~i I' ~IJII i j ~ z~ ~I ; tf I' 'H" I 11 5! Ilfl; "I II, .. 'I [ Ii. . Ul ~~ ~ !!t I j!Il!II,1 IC" - r8ro~i .~-I ci "l,"t ;1 i III 'I 1 II' "'UO,... UtS~ [ I' -I ; If rn ~ l' III ~ J~ln I Ii :D~n ;1It~ ;):c ' -I'i [ [ J.. "'!!:i ~.~ ~-i I" [II r' ,I !"' & &1"" 1= Ill:' li J " CfJ ~ ". I~ ~ - i ill Ii hi ~ltlliil' g ~ ' j ?l ? I - t ~ _ S:. , l "~ - . I J~ i .. - J!! z ~ n ~. , - ~ . ~- E X H I BIT "C" . BOYNTON BEACII POLICE DEPARTME TRAFFIC UNIT ~)~ ~VI- - ~ J i 1 ,995 l~ TO' FROM DATE. REF TAMBRI HEYDEN. PLANNING & ZONING DlRECl SGT MARLON HARRIS. POLlCE DEPARTMENT 17 AUGUST 95 PACKAGING CONCEPTS MEMO #0160 I have reviewed the above plans and fl~$l::!~'f9Irafi!\~~9..~~J;V,~: The roadway width (22 feetl5tr.~iQp}wt!! a sm;J1 ~":~n for full "lzcd "cml tractor trallo", to be travelling 9'" ~~.J*Mlon. and slz<<gf the 10~lng dock seems to be a eon- cerned area. I would plpject il1at the t~cks are going tg:h'~~~ south on Beta Drive (towards the cul-de-sk,) 'h.d then back Into the two loatli~,.ttock areas on the cast side of the buildin.~I ~puld p~oject that the turn ~ould e\'-=~hWa.qs th~ use of the swale area on the east sl<)'c'of'eta Dnve to encounter thIs maneut.er \ there IS currcntly no business present olfifi<feast side of Beta Drive. but when o~'jJ~,built.1 would see a con- tlict. Also, most semi-tractor trailers are approximately eleven foot wide (the width of the projected lane) .-q:d:whfn onq'1J1I~,,~q presfqt:."tlti' WOut'-elimiqate travel of another vehicle (or !ruck) in th~d.'~.,p~.~~e dirddti.',?-t~?:!WOUIP~~J.I),~,.J.rthiS ~adw~~.'. is going to ~~ constantly subjected to lar*~ se~~ractdlltruck. )lse t~3fthe'roadw <~ be ",:j~ened to a mInimum of 26 feet. I think lthe:Un1e it also:trtk, 'fdtalidtrucks tbJe*t:tbe:::loading area. Running over curbs or grassy swale area of both the east and west sides of the roadway will be eminent in order to man~\ly.er.th.c tUI11. /'1} {) ',. r i' :'! i: ~ "; L :. ~ ~"""'~':"~' Respectful!):,... .../.~,~:\.,,:~,'):~) ~ .....~ .:,::""' '. .' ~ ::,'1 l: ( \."", ': Siif':Marlon Harris {' ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-199 DATE. June 22. 1995 I.Q.;. T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR, FROM. KEN HALL, ENG AIDE PHONE 407-375-6283 CiI!. SUBJECT: PACKAGING CONCEPTS - 1st REVIEW The following comments/recommendations are submitted for your review If any of the code comments disallow the applicant to develop the site as submitted, the applicant may request an exemption thru the planning department as stipulated in Chapter one, Article C~~, Section eleven of the city's Land Development Regulations. All plans submitted for specIfic penmts shall meet the city's code requirements at time of application These permits include, but are not limited to the following: Site lighting, Paving, Drainage, Curbing, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Traffic Control Devices. Permits required from agencIes such as the F DOT P B County S F W M D., and any other permlttmg agency shall be 1I1c1uded wIth your permIt request. COMMENTS 1 On east ..ide (?lhuilding correct parking stall length ji'om /6ji to 18 Ii Citv standard drawi/l~ B-9()()f 2 2 Provide a .'iati.ifactorv traflic colltrol plan as required Chap 23 Art. liB 3 Pmvide a {'erttlied drainage plan indudin~ calcu/ations jimn a F/orida registered en~ineer Chap 23 Art /IF 4 Parcel require.. replatting unless em exemption can he ohtainedfi"Om the Citv Engineer Chap5 Art II Sect I (Lot 47 has a/readv heen .'IlIhdivic/ed Jimr times) 5 Maximum width oleast drivewav shall he 32/eet unless otherwise approved hv the Director otDevelopment Chap 23 Art./lH I RECOMMENDATIONS I Consider moving curhing alOlI~ east parking ...tall.. tlvofeet out (eastward) to act as a COIlfilllinUS wheel \'top It eliminates jJos..iiible tripping ha=ard with individual wheel 'itops and fiilure maintenance The same application could he applied to the north side (?lthe huilding bv e'(telllting the width (?lthe sidewalk hv two feet KRH/krh C WIlliam Hukill, Dev Dir and to file. rUL ; ~ ll--' AP,l!t!G MID t..1 '" ZorJING DEPT. {J1 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 95-311 TO Tambri J Heyden Plannin9 , Zoning Director ~~m Hukill, P E ~\En9ineer August 23, 1995 PACKAGING CONCEPTS - 2ND SITE PLAN REVIEW FROM DATE: RE We have completed our second review of 8ubject plane and have the following to offer: A Provide certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes & standards Chap 6, Art IV, Sec SA, pg 6-7 and Chap. 23, Art. I IF, pg 23-8 B Parking lot section must conform to City code Chap 6, Art IV, Sec 10F, pg 6-12 C Photometries must be approved for both pedestrian and parking lot lighting before bbilding permit can be issued Chap 23, Art II,A1a, pg 23-6 D Provide stop bar @ stop sign Chap 23, Art IIB2, pg 23-7 E Concrete curb must conform to City standards Chap 23, Art lIE, pg 23-7 Comments from the June 22, 1995 first review remaining uncorrected are numbers 1,3 and 5 We recommend forwarding the project to the Planning and Development Board subject to all comments contained herein WVH ck C PA<1<CONCZNIl August 18, 1995 n '1" BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 95-311 To Tambri, Planning & Zoning Director From Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Packaging Concepts - 2nd Review - New Site Plan QUantum Park, 4925 Park Ridge Blvd Re After reviewing the applicant's response to our first comments, I find that they did not institute the changes in the actual drawings Their written response shows their willingness to comply, but the plan documents should reflect subject changes The four items in the applicant's memorandum to you, responding to previous Building Division comments, are not shown on the plans 1 Handicap access route provided to ~in entrance of building 2 Sign details 3 Plans reflecting details for only one free-standing sign in compliance with code 4 Details of wall sign in compliance with code Plan documents must be submitted with these items appropriately addressed prior to this project going to the City Commission for final approval AN mh cc William V Hukill, P E , Department of Development Director A pJ(G CON TRC E X H I BIT "0" . . TO FROM DATE SUBJECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 95-472 Tambri J Hf2yden planning and Zoning Director Dan DeCarlo Assistant planner September 12, 1995 Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - New Site Plan Project packaging Concepts Location 4925 Park Ridge Boulevard, Quantum Park Agent Jeff Lis File No NWSP 95-007 The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-1 efe1 enced proj ect It should ,be noted that the comments are divided into twc (2) categories The first category is a list _f comments that identif~ unresolved comments either from the first re' ~ew 01 new comments as a result of the second review To show v.)m:,Jlial ce with tllese comments will not substantially alter the :onfiguration of the site and design of the building The second _at~qory is a list of recommendations I believe will enhanc~ the aesthetics and function of the project hll comments and recommendati0ns can be lectified on the pland at t 1m,:: )f p'?rmi tting it the si te plan request is approved The applicant must understand that additiunal comments may be generated Up.Jll !. 8\'if2\-' of the documents and working drawings submi tted to the Euilding Department for permits for the proposed project I SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. 1 Please be advised that the prnperty dimensi0ns as shoh'n on the "Boundary Survey dated May 22, 1995 dl a....1ll by !..idbe1g Lane! Sun e'} Inc " do not match the boundan, dimensions of the subject pruperty as shown on the Palm :::ea.cl1 COllnt~ Tax Hap (E'94) Contact the Engineering Di li~ion ," f the De lelopment Depart:nent regarding the procedure3 to foll~w in subdividing land ") Pleas~ proTide the foll~wirg archite:tural plans aE they llC!ve ID': been submit tec1 and. therefore, not inc I uded i!l tIle first leview a) Sca:ed floer plans f~'l- the p!.-op~sed Etructule indicating the use within each space Also identify the number of stories and whether there i:::, a mezzanine b) Indicate ext =1 ior c )lors bJ color name col Jr nn:nber or designation 2.nd mant~facturer I s name ana identify the type of all exterior materials -) -J~mi~ fo_ reviev' building and site signage in compliance tlith the sign code and the Quantum sign program 4 .3'J!Jr.l:' t ',nd.?r a separate 3.pplice.tion a use approv31 _ r nClllTen tl J to alloH the I:roposed use in compl iance wi tll ,,_t} codee:: 5 2hcw un the cite pl2n 3-nd ele'/ation \Tie\'l dr3.vlitqs ,f t-he building, th~ lo:atinn of the mechanical equipment Page 2 File No NWSP 95-007 Date September 12, 1995 Site Plan Review - 2nd Review - New Site Plan Packaging concepts the site, such as electrical transformers and roof top mechanical equipment Also show on the appropriate plan the type, size, spacing and color of the material required to screen the equipment 6 Place a typical dimension on the plan that represent the forty (40) foot on center spacing for the required trees along the right-of-way 7 correct the discrepancy between the spacing of the required hedge landscape material identified in the landscape notes found on the landscape plan and the spacing identified on the plant list found and the landscape detail plan Note The maximum spacing of the hedge material required to form the continuous barrier to screen the vehicle use area is two feet on center 8 To avoid a conflict betwe~n the location of landscape material and the site lighting poles, pedestrian lighting, fire hydrants, drainage structures and other site appurtenances, show and label these improvements on the landscape plan where applicable Also specify the overall height of the proposed site lighting poles 9 Additional fees will be charged for the first review of the second submittal II RECOMMENDATIONS 8 Recommend using melaleuca mulch instead of pine needle mulch NOTE If recommendations are approved, they shall be incorporated into the working drawings reqUired for permits for the project DeD dim xc central File II lndco. PAC PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 95-440 FROM Carrie Parker, City Manager Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Clyde "Skip" Milor, utility Dept Chief Field Insp Sgt Marlon Harris, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist William Hukill, ~~!~tor Department of Development ~ ~ 1d'7\.' ~C>~ ., Tambri J Hey~ Plann1ng & Zon1ng D1rector August 14, 1995 TO DATE SUBJECT: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review New Site plan Project Packaging Concepts Location 4925 Park Ridge Boulevard, Quantum Park Applicant Jeff Lis File No NWSP 95-007 Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced project for your final review and recommendation We would ask that you review this amended site plan submittal to determine if the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments previously made by your department If your comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing If your comments have not been met, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing Finally, we would ask that you include in your memorandum a recommendation as to whether the project should be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for consideration Please return your memorandum and the amended plans to the Planning and Zoning Department by 5 00 P M on Tuesday, August 22, 1995 If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to call Dan DeCarlo at Extension 6260, who is coordinating the review of this project cc (Memo Only) Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief Charlie Frederick, Recreation and Parks Director Tom Dettman, Police Chief John Guidry, utilities Director . lnda.,vM.. 'kll PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 95-440 FROM Carrie Parker, City Manager Robert Eichorst, Public works Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention officer Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utility Dept Chief Field Insp sgt Marlon Harris, police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist William Hukill, ~~!~tor Department of Development ~ ~ 1c:r7\..' r;of2... Tambri J Hey~ Planning & Zoning Director August 14, 1995 TO. DATE SUBJECT: Site Plan Review - 2nd Review New Site Plan Location Packaging Concepts 4925 Park Ridge Boulevard, Quantum Park Project Applicant File No Jeff Lis NWSP 95-007 Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced project for your final review and recommendation We would ask that you review this amended site plan submittal to determine if the plans have been adjusted to satisfy comments previously made by your department If your comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing If your comments have not been met, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing Finally, we would ask that you include in your memorandum a recommendation as to whether the project should be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for consideration Please return your memorandum and the amended plans to the Planning and Zoning Department by 5 00 P.M on Tuesday, August 22, 1995 If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to call Dan DeCarlo at Extension 6260, who is coordinating the review of this project cc (Memo Only) Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief Charlie Frederick, Recreation and Parks Director Tom Dettman, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director a 2ndllavK.. 'kv RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-311 !b ~ p, R r ! n i r t.:! / RE Tambn Heyden, Plannmg & Zomng DIrector KevIn J Hallahan, Forester/EnvlronmentalIst f<>> tJ- Packaging Concepts At Quantum Park ~, ...,..,.1 TO' 'I' i I! "I i2 .__Z~. __.____ f~~___ -.. ..---.--- .~,.,~. ',.... FROM. DATE. July 12, 1995 The applIcant should proVIde a statement and/or a tree survey ofthe eXIsting trees on the property (lots 47 A and 4 7B) ThIS Information should be part of the sIte plan submIttal pnor to obtaIning a c1eanng permIt. The applIcant should make a comment If the sIte will be consIdered for mIcro sIting. The project should contmue In the normal reVIew process. KH.ad DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 95-234 TO Tambri J Heyden Planning & zoning Director FROM _am Hukill, P E Englneer DATE July 12, 1995 RE PACKAGING CONCEPTS Please recall our concerns expressed in detail at the July 11 TRC meeting specifically regarding LDR Chapter 2, Section 4, paragraph N, pages 2-11 to 2-15 requirements as they relate to subject project The performance standards included therein are very subjective and, frankly, beyond this department's expertise to make determinations, particularly considering that no submissions have been offered with respect to the standards In other words, we have insufficient information to comment on the performance standards, and even if we had such information, we are not qualified to make any judgement We are not administrators of Chapter 2, but if we were we likely would require the applicant to submit certification by qualified experts regarding compliance with each of the ten numbered portions of paragraph N, submit (and record) a document guaranteeing permanent compliance with all portions of paragraph N, hold harmless and indemnify (in perpetuity) the City from actions brought relating to activities outlined in paragraph N, including but not limited to Consultant and Attorney fees, and provide irrevocable surety for each WVH/ck xc Carrie Parker, City Manager James Cherof, City Attorney Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator Skip Milor, utility Dept Chief Inspector John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Al Newbold, Deputy Bldg Official m lli ~ ~ n ~lj ~ 1:'\." I ~n r -----t\ II \ U : I! I ~ ~l~r- ! U i1 I ! \ '1 \::;::;.J , L.J i UL ' i PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. C:PACKCONC.COM TO FROM DATE RE FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO 95-275 WDC Planning Department Fire Department July 17, 1995 Packaging Concepts NWSP 95-007 4925 Park Ridge Blvd, Quantum Blvd Provide fire hydrants at 1 The corner of Park Ridge Blvd and Beta Drive 2 S E corner of the property south of loading dock drive /' 0r / r/ / 1'- f'7( ~~"- c~-. .p\ William D cavanaUgh,:tPo ~ DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO !'-"II, ? , ~: I ? 1 J I ~ ,j'Jr l' . I! ~ II I i..J Iw_~ , . I 95-352 (Uf?n l!D LS U ~fl r:: r-' "I i~ i" \~ '~.II i I I., ~ ! j: j .J i__' , I A, Pu>,NNING AND zr)i~ NG DEPl ~t11 I TO Tambri J Heyden Planning & Zoning Director ~~g~~~~~l' P E September 14, 1995 FROM DATE RE PACKAGING CONCEPTS Our July 12 memo No 95-234 apparently has been interpreted as placing a surety requirement on the applicant for subject installation What it actually did was admit that we were neither administrators of Chapter 2 nor expert on paragraph N, but if we were we likely would require certain things of an applicant, including performance surety That was not,a condition, it was advice You may utilize or ignore the advice as you see fit, which is totally appropriate because you are much more knowledgeable about the entire situation than we are Interestingly, the applicant agreed in writing (on August 9) to provide surety WVH ck xc James Cherof, City Attorney Jeff Lis, Catalfumo C:PACKCONC.REQ . \! R f~ ~"""'"7r.o...'\.-""-'--'~a r ~EP I 11995 RECREA nON & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-385 - REVISED~,~__..~~__.. ~ A "'^ " \\~'--\. ~~L l\~ :J y _ / (f ~.--1 ._. >.,~ E)T. KGdG 1~; ..v 1 J ~ TO. Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zomng Drrector FROM. Kevm J Hallahan, Forester/Envuonmentalist ~ ~ Packaging Concept RE DATE. Septembe!" 5, 1995 The applicant must indIcate If the sIte will be used m any portion for mlcro-sitmg. The area(s) for rmcr~siting must be clearly indIcated on the SIte plan and protected dunng site development. The project should continue on the normal review process. KH.ad -2t!"'"~. "'_. ~ ~~~ ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 95-292 TO Carrie Parker, City Manager Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept Chief Field Insp Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Sgt Marlon Harris, Police Department Al Newbold, Building Division William Hukill, Director of Department of Development Kevin H~ala p'/.~~rester/Environmentalist .-~~ .~(L Tambri J en, Planning & Zoning Director June 20, 1 9 FROM DATE RE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1st Review Project Location Applicant File No of 2nd Submittal - New Site Plan - Packaging Concepts - 4925 Park Ridge Boulevard, Quantum - Jeff Lis - NWSP 95-007 Park Due to additional staff time required to review resubmittal of the above-referenced plans, please document in writing the cost of your additional review time and return to me no later than 5 00 PM on June 30, 1995 The cost is to be computed as follows Additional reviews will be billed to the appplicant based on the hourly salary of employees involved in the review, plus 35% for fringe benefits TJH dim TO PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 95-285 Carrie Parker, City Manager Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept Chief Field Insp Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director J~hn Wildner, Parks Superintendent B111 Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Sgt Marlon Harris, Police Department Al Newbold, Building Division William Hukill, Director of Department of Development Kevin Hallahanh no~es.ter/Environmentalist . ..... ',~~~ Tambr1 J He den, Planning & Zoning Director June FROM DATE RE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1st Review of 2nd Submittal - New Site Plan Project - Packaging Concepts Location - 4925 Park Ridge Boulevard, Quantum Park Applicant - Jeff Lis File No - NWSP 95-007 Please find attached an amended site plan for your review for the above-referenced project Please discard the original plans that were attached to Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No 95- 254 and replace with the plans attached to this memorandum The applicant is requesting approval of the plans that have the following caption handwritten in the upper right hand corner of the first sheet of the set of plans "1st review - 2nd submittal" The primary changes from the first submittal are described in the attached letter dated June 19, 1995 from Jeff Lis If there are additional questions regarding the review of the second submittal plans, please contact Dan DeCarlo (ext 6264) To ensure that the project stays on track with the review time frame, the plans and exhibits be reviewed and formal written comments on legal size paper transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5.00 P.M. on June 30. 1995. Do not return plans and exhibits Retain same for the review of the amended plans (second review) Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval 1 Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments 2 The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete based on the submittal requirements identified in section 7 of the site Plan Review Ordinance However, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and Zoning Department 3 Each comment shall reference the applicable section of the code page 2 of 2 Packaging Concepts To TRC Members Re Planning & Zoning Memo 95-285 4 Technical Review Committee member (s) shall identify in their comments whether the plans depict or whether the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements 5 When a TRC member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC member that is responsible for the review specified 6 If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and recommend the proj ect be forwarded through the approval process All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the applicant Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum Michael Haag and Dan DeCarlo will be the Planning and Zoning Department staff members coordinating the first review of the project The Planning and Zoning Department will send the applicant a cover letter which includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission When the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, we will distribute the plans with a cover memorandum to all TRC members for review and approval TJH dim Attachment XC (Memo Only) Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director Thomas Dettman, Police Chief John Guidry, utilities Director Central File A lSTR!VK! PKG/TRC 06/19 95 17 17 FAX 1 407 471 1201 CATALFU!(O CO S ~001l001 DEVELOpmG · BUIIDI!\Ge LEASING. MANAGING Memorandum To City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department Mike Haag From Jeff Lis Re Packaging Concepts Please allow thiS memo to serve as the formal Qxplaination of changes made to the original submittal for Packaging Concepts. Upon initial review it was noted that the set back requirem~nts for the building were not compEitable with the code The submitted site plan had 15' rear and side setbacks, the code 'caUs for a rear setback of 30' and a side setback of 20' The petitioner has amended the site plan to accomodate the code requirements by reducing the drive aisle on the east sIde of the building to, one-way traffic with angled packing, siidingthe building to theasst and adjusting dimensions on the building footprint The newly submitted building IS s~wen (7) square feet Jess in sizetnan the original submittal, which meets the petitioners requirements Landscaping and engineering plans have been amended accordingly In addition, the original request for silos on the site has been withdrawn, In the event the petitioner needs them in the future. a forma! application will be made at that time If there is additional information needed please let me know (~-['" .. '4b 1540 IATHAMROAD · VVEsT PALM BEACH. FL 33409. (407) 471'(]338 · FAX (407) 471.1201 . -., . ." - - . . , .. ~ r."/rj) I ,1 n!, ~ , .1 I i -'I I A !~" i i i )'j , Lj. "';:) Gl' ~ ~ i)LI\NNING AND '"",,AM j ):, NG DEPl M '..:1 '";'l 17 n I'""j] 1 jjr~ .:Lr.; U ,ij , " i ! I i I , i '" I DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 95-352 TO Tambri J Heyden Plannlng & zoning Director ~~~g~~~~~l, P E September 14, 1995 FROM DATE RE PACKAGING CONCEPTS Our July 12 memo No 95-234 apparently has been interpreted as placing a surety requirement on the applicant for subject installation What it actually did was admit that we were neither administrators of Chapter 2 nor expert on paragraph N, but if we were we likely would require certain things of an applicant, including performance surety That was not a condition, it was advice You may utilize or ignore the advice as you see fit, which is totally appropriate because you are much more knowledgeable about the entire situation than we are Interestingly, the applicant agreed in writing (on August 9) to provide surety WVH ck xc James Cherof, City Attorney Jeff Lis, Catalfumo C.PACKCONC.REQ ) Memorandum To City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department From Jeff Lis Agent Re Packaging Concepts Enclosed with this resubmittal please find revised site plans and revised landscape and preliminary engineering plans reflecting changes warranted in response to Review Comments referred to in the City's letter dated July 10 1995 We are in receipt of a memo from William Hukill to Tambri Heyden regarding use compliance as outlined under LDR Chapter 2 Section 4 paragraph N Pages 2-11 through 2-15 Under separate submittal the petitioner will request the acceptance of their proposed use as being consistent with permitted uses within the development and in compliance with City codes, The petitioner has developed a response to the Performance Standards portion of the City Code which defines the proposed use in terms of its impact on the development. In addition the petitioner has agreed to hold the City harmless and indemnify the City into perpetuity in the event there is an occuranc€ which violates the City's performance standards but the report makes it very clear that the petitioner's planned activities do not adversely impact any performance standards The following is an item by item response to Staff comments and reviewing departments CHECKLIST 1) We have marked changes on the original submittal form 2) Submitting twelve sets including site plan surveys landscape plans and preliminary engineering plans 3) There are no existing buildings on the site 4) Colored elevation 24 x 36 will be submitted prior to presentation to the P and D Board along with color samples with manufacturer #'s 5) Color samples stucco sample window sample will be provided prior to the P and D hearings 6) Landscape transparency will be submitted prior to the P and D hearings Parks 1) No Comments Forester 1) Comments on landscape plans address existing trees not further comments to be addressed Director of Utilities 1) The petitioner will pay the required Capacity Reservation Fee at the time of permitting or within thirty days (30) of City Commission approval whichever is the sooner of the two 2) This information will be provided prior to the payment of the Capacity Reservation Fee in item #1 above 3) Hydrant locations have been shown on new engineering site plan at locations requested by the Fire Department. 4) The relocation of trees into the right of way is consistent with the streetscape plan already established within the PID We will conform with the desires of the City 50 long as all departments are consistent with their request and so long as there are no conflicting requirements, Enaineerin....Q 1) Parking stall dimensions have been adjusted to conform with City Code 2) Traffic Control Plan - Prior to the issuance of a permit from the Engineering Department for any Site Work a Traffic Control Plan will be established 3) Certified Drainage plan with calculations and details are being provided by the project engineer 4) The petitioner is requesting an exemption from replatting from the City Engineer 5) East Driveway width has be limited to 32 feet 6) Parking dimensions have been changed to reflect City standards along east parking area Fire Department 1) Hydrants have been located as requested AI Newbold - Deputv Buildina Official 1) A handicap access route has been provided for at the main entrance to the building 2) A sign package will be submitted at a later date 3) Petitioner will modify plans to indicate only one free standing sign 4) Details for the wall and free standing signs will be submitted at a later date Police 1) No Comments Public Works 1) The dumpster has been relocated to eliminate conflicts with traffic driveways. Mike HaaQ 1) Done 2) Done 3) We are requesting an exemption from re-platting or re-subdividing the subject parcels 4) through 17) Requested changes have been made 18) Architectural Plans are being submitted as follows. a) The building footprint on the site plan should suffice as a floorplan for the project at this time This is a single tenant building and at this time there has been no plan developed for the layout of the interior for the tenant At such time that interior plans are developer they will be submitted to the building department for permitting b) Building elevations are being provided with all required information with this submittal c) Color samples and chips will be submitted prior to the first P and D Board hearing 19) Done 20) Done 21) Done 22) A sign package for the building and site will be submitted for review and approval at a later date 23) A separate application for use has been submitted for review and approval 24) The loading area has been enclosed within the building and screened with overhead bay doors and walls 25) Location of equipment serving the building has not been established as of this date At such time as locations have been selected all equipment will be screened line of sight, either on the ground or roof with materials consistent with the building's general architecture 26) Agreed. 'I'RACKIW-- '..0<.:.. - Sl'l'E PLAN REVIEW SUI TTAL PRuJl::.C'l' T l'rLE DE::icRIP'l'IuN '1' Y P E DArl'E REc D PACKAGING CONCEPTS NEW SITE PLAN - Building X NEW ::iITE PLAN 5/31/95 AMuUNT FILE NU NWSP 95-007 MAJuR ::iITE PLAN MODIFICATIuN $750.00 RE.CEIPT Nu 01913 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) ::iETS SUBMITTED CULURED ELEVATIUNS REc'D (Plans shall be pre-assembled The planning & Zoning Dept will number each sheet of their set The planning Dept set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match ) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATIUN & ::iUBMITTAL DATE ACe; P~ED ~')/:i/ yj DENIED DATE DATE UF LETTER TU APPLIcANT IDENTIfYING SUBMI::i::iIUN DEFICIENCIE::i 2nd ::iUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DENIED DATE DATE DATE UF ::iUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER REVIEWER'::i NAME * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Label TRC uepartments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMU NUMBER Ur MENU ::iENT TU TRc T0 PERFURM INITIAL REVIEW DATE ::iEN'l' kErURN DATE fo~(}/qJ- , MEMU NUMBER 9~-~S-~ 1st REVIEW CUMMENT::i REcElVED JUtil I p w ~ p~rks 1:1re ./ Police ~/1 l'YPE UI: MENU # / DATE I IICII - / ~'/'l.3 I ).) 9'.\-- J99 / v> 9s .J.3'f I J ~ 9S"-() 1,).; C:../~o/r;.r / ~ \...~ 9J~' J 1/ "l//:J.lf!.r L S- DAI'E uF 1'1EE'1'ING -'-/,027 jtfs ~ /,.;,/9; - y , PLAN::i ~EMU * /~E I 'cll Y YS- If)" / J7 -'L.. 'I ~~/ 'if:-/ ~ 'i - ~/ ~ (!, -.'t-- ~g1:r., j,ljo)(.~"" ~ Y J/ Cn.- -o/"I~-/ (. /7/ ~Jt-S.c- Y _ 021 ~o v~ ?lla /"r Co. VAH1-ANCJ::.l::i) PLAN::i Planning v'Building /Engineer U1gi neer / 1: orester y DA~'E UF LETTl::.R ::iENT TU APPLICANT IDENTIFYIN<.:.. TRC REVIEW CUMMENT::i (Aesthetic Review App , dates of board mtgs & checklist sen~ out wi comments) NINETY DAY CALENDAR DA'I'E WHEN APPLICA'I'IuN BECUMES NULL AND VUID DATE 12 CUMPLETE SET::i OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW (Must be assembled Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support , J - ~ CULURED ELEVATIuNS REC I nor- ." ryr.. r~ - 6~)( " MEMU SENT Tu T~ Tu PERFORM 2nd REVIEW DA'l'E SEN'I' _ ~ V t(~ MEMU # '1..r ~~ D , documents) RETURN DATE F~2.. _ 7-; 19'J 2n9 REVIEW RECOMMENDATIUN/DENIAL Util P W Parks Fire Police prs ff,,1i2j rf~ j~~)" . ~b . r/ _/ /~- i _Nb,J~ /=1=3 / <-' !l:' -:~ 1 / '.)/ / L/ _ ~j / e::..- el ~ -----oT~ 't /1 C/ LETTER '!'U APPLh..ANT REGARDI"i1G TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND PLAcED AT THE PRUPERTY DATE SENT,::ilGN::i IN::iTALLED ::iCHEDULE UF BUP.RD MEETINGS PAD _~J- PLA ',It) Planntng BUilding Enginee t- -Eng: iRI! e I- Forster f 'I MEMU # / DATE /uR/DII /~/_- CiS" '311 / / C/ 9~ .J11 I / c..... _ / . / 9..\ -..33S- / 6/~~ / C/ _ LAND DEVELOPMENT ::iIGNo CCICRA~h!? S- DArE. APPRUVAL LETTER ::iENT A rl'RACKING ;:, J "...,.~_..-,,,,-..--...... ~ ---..--~-,--.....----_.. ;. .J ~ t ; ~-~ i RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-385 - REVISED PL \;INC ~D ~_~~~.~~~~~r L TO' Tambn Heyden, Plannmg & Zomng DIrector RE Kevm J Hallahan, Forester/Envuonmentahsl ~ ~ Packaging Concept FROM. DATE. September 5, 1995 The applIcant must mdlcate If the SIte will be used m any portIon for mlcro-sltmg. The area(s) for mlcro-sltmg must be clearly mdicated on the SIte plan and protected dunng SIte development. The project should contmue on the normal reVIew process. KH.ad 00 rnS~ rn : ~ rn 1m .~ PLANNiNG AND ~ _A. ; 7CN \(; CpT V"7't.<--/ ..-,....,.-.".........-->.0 ,_,~.._, -.:._.,-__. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. ~J MJG 2 3 9Ii DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 95-317 FROM Tambri J Heyden Planning & zoning Director ~~m ~ukill, P E ~Englneer August 23, 1995 TO DATE RE PACKAGING CONCEPTS - 2ND SITE PLAN REVIEW We have completed our second review of subject plans and have the following to offer A Provide certification by Developer'S Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes & standards Chap 6, Art IV, See 5A, pg 6-7 and Chap 23, Art IIF, pg 23-8 B Parking lot section must conform to City code Chap 6, Art IV, See 10F, pg 6-12 C Photometries must be approved for both pedestrian and parking lot lighting before building permit can be issued Chap 23, Art II,A1a, pg 23-6 D Provide stop bar @ stop sign Chap 23, Art I IB2, pg 23-7 E Concrete curb must conform to City standards Chap 23, Art lIE, pg 23-7 Comments from the June 22, 1995 first review remaining uncorrected are numbers 1,3 and 5 We recommend forwarding the project to the Planning and Development Board subject to all comments contained herein WVH ck C:PACKCONC'.2ND TO' FROM. DATE SUBJECT "..., RECREATION & PARKS MEMORANDUM NO 95-385 Tambri Heyden, Director of Planmng & Zomng Kevm J Hallahan, ForesterlEnvrronmentahst ~~ -\t August 22, 1995 Packagmg Concepts - SIte Plan '''', '" The apphcant has addressed my preVIous connnents. The plan should contmue on the normal reVIew process. KH.crn PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-147 TO Tambn Heyden, P1annmg & Zomng DIrector FROM Robert EIchorst, Pubhc Works DIrector SUBJ SIte Plan ReVIew - 2nd RevIew - Packagmg Concepts DATE August 16, 1995 The Pubhc Works Department has no problems wIth the above sIte and the project should be forwarded to the Plannmg & Development Board for consIderatIOn. RElcr r-~~-.~ 4' -::- 1 1 I. ~ f) r I! lJ) ; if --~ -jl : . ~ ~~ TO' FROM DATE. REF BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTME TRAFFIC UNIT ((G ;:1 \1 'i\n R ~ \~ \.\ ~J \; ~ 1~ T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DlREC SGT MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEP AR TMENT 17 AUGUST 95 PACKAGING CONCEPTS pl,ANN\NG MiD 10N\NG OfPl MEMO #0160 I have revIewed the above plans and fil1<.i,:!b:~'fQU6"'Ipg::c09,~~m~. The roadway Width (22 feet>:::9r:neta,\Qhv~ls, a smiilf sti.tttenslOn for full sized semi tractor traIlers to be travellmg 9{). 'the,,J:ocatlOn, and slze~,qfthc 103.i:bng dock seems to be a con- ,. . . cerned area. I wouldpt,oJectthat the trucks are gomg to:tf~v~l south on Beta Dnve (towards the cul-de-she) and then back mto the two loathntfdqck areas on the east Side of the bUlldm~:: I wpuld project that the turn would eh~oil1pass the use of the swale area on the east sHte'nf$eta Dnve to encounter thiS maneu,ver : 'There IS currently no busmess present oft'the east SIde of Beta Dnve, but when oil~)s:::bUllt, I would see a con- flICt. Also, most semI-tractor trailers are approximately eleven foot WIde (the WIdth of the projected lane) ~t):d:w:h~n on(nru:c:,':~s pres~t;:tht~:woul~"eh:tn.1Qate travel of another vehicle (or truck) m the.:OPpo$lte dlr~dtt.on,:fwoul~r~~,I,IJJ~ jfthls::rpadw~y IS gomg to be constantly subjected to lartf'serrifttractd{truc~vse t~ai:th'e'roadw~y be 'Yi4ened to a minImum of 26 feet. I thmk dlc::same is also: true' fdtthC:trucks t():::eXit::tbc:loading area. Runnmg over curbs or grassy swale area of both the east and west Sides ofthe roadway WIll be emInent m order to man~.u.y.er..th.e turn. Respectfulb~,,-, ~.~ ..".,.,....:':.:a.:""...:'..~ .".-- . , . . . . . , . . , . ' .; ":. '. ., i-; , : . . ....,.,... , 'S'gf'Marlon Hams FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO 95-327 WDe August 21, 1995 TO Planning Department FROM Fire Department SUBJ site plan Review - 2nd Review Packaging Concepts 4925 Park Ridge Blvd NWSP 95-007 \. rn We have no further objections to this plan cc Chief Jordan steve campbell, FPO II File mli1mnw~.~ AUG 2 3 1995 ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. fA, 4ftl'a~~4~(t"ri,t C' William D Cavanaugh,' PO RECREATION & PARKS MEMORANDUM SUBJECT Package Concepts - Site Plan FROM Tambri J Heyden Planning and Zoning Director John Wildner r Parks Superintendent August 23, 1995 TO DATE The Recreation and Parks Department as reviewed the above- referenced plans and has no comments at this time The project may continue through the normal review process XC Central File August 18, 1995 ,~ lUJ I ! Ii ) '- m (& ~ n fI,'1 rc ~' BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 95-311 To Tambri, Planning & Zoning Director From Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Re Packaging Concepts - 2nd Review - New Site Plan Quantum Park, 4925 Park Ridge Blvd After reviewing the applicant's response to our first comments, I find that they did not institute the changes in the actual drawings Their written response shows their willingness to comply, but the plan documents should reflect subject changes The four items in the applicant's memorandum to you, responding to previous Building Division comments, are not shown on the plans 1 Handicap access route provided to main entrance of building 2 Sign details 3 Plans reflecting details for only one free-standing sign in compliance with code 4 Details of wall sign in compliance with code Plan documents must be submitted with these items appropriately addressed prior to this project going to the City Commission for final approval AN mh cc William V Hukill, P E , Department of Development Director A PICG CON TlI.C MEMORANDUM UtilitIes # 95-262 Date August 21, 1995 ~.~..&. If;7 ~r;. -...'. \7 i~fi. -"iii)11 I Uk:, 2 11995 !'&JI ~~AJi~Wg[~~D TO Tambn J Heyden, Planmng & Zorung FROM. John A. GuIdry, DIrector ofUtihtIes SUBJECT Packaging Concepts, New Site Plan Second Review Staffhas revIewed the above referenced project and offer the followmg comments 1 UtilitIes has no addItIonal comments at thIS tIme It IS our recommendatIOn that the plan proceed through the reVIew process, If you have any questIons regardmg thIS subject, please contact Slap Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404 sm xc Clyde "SkIp" Milor Peter Mazzella .-f/ File "* PACKAGING U()HY 05"- C'C ~ ~ I~ Pg. 1/ 5 --;.tUT~ C}'ONC&Ir~'f ~:A{S:~S:OtC;~I"~~~ II August 9, 1995 Planning & Zoning Dept. City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL., 33425 Re: Request for use approval in Quantum Corporate Park To Whom It May Concern" The Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Dept. have requested the following information and statement per our request to use our anticipated manufacturing plant in the Quantum Corporate Park per the City of Boynton Beach Performance Standards & Ordinances. To respond to Section N "Performance Standards" of the City of Boynton Beach, Municipal Code, one must know the scope of Packaging Concepts Assoc. Inc. (PCA) anticipated activities which can be broken down as shown below. In brief, PCA is engaged in the R & D of non-aerosol spray dispensing systems, in the manufacture of its new patented MPAK plastic spray dispenser and in the manufacture of OTC (over the counter) drug and other chemical specialty liquid products. Plastic Injection Molding: We currently have tooling for the 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 FL.OZ. MPAK plastic spray dispenser unit with a 4.0 FL.OZ size in progress The MPAK unit is unique in being a small, compact non-aerosol spray dispenser with a locking feature. The unit also is fully assembled ready for product filling without the need for concerns to purchase all the components needed for a comparable package. To produce the MPAK dispenser, we plan to install plastic injection molding machines The number of machines required is not known at this time, but we anticipate a start- up of at least one machine per MPAK size Printing. Each MPAK plastic dispenser will be offset decorated for its required labeling and product identification We use a special offset blanket type printer that uses non-toxic UV inks especially made for plastic. The UV inks are instantaneously cured and ~4~e permanent when auto- matically exposed to an UV light source concealed within the printing machine. Continued. FnHl1 Initial COlH:ept To Hnished Product ';'"'00 Lake \X'"rth Rd "uill 211"1\ . L,kc \\'(lrlh FI. -\-\l()-\ . Tel (,Hl~) 9(,'i"1130 . fax (,Hl~) 96';.471i I' () II", -\".,. l\,.,d!-'cP(l11 ('1' ()( ,;. 'I'll (21)"1 -\;0;., ,';<;1-\ . Fax (205) 5-\'1.0'10'; AACKAGING Pg" 2/ 5 CON C E P'T S 'A S SO C. 'I N C, f' " Assembly: In order to make a working MPAK spray dispenser necessary components must be attatched to the basic plastic tube. We plan to automatically insert a mechanical non-aerosol pump module and then affix an actuator in the locked position to the printed tube. The tube bottom is left open for product filling to which a bottom piston seal is affixed to make a secure package. Compounding" The Compounding Dept. is a very important part of the PCA facility. It is here that the various liquid products are compounded (ingred- ients added & mixed) per approved customer or PCA formulations The area and equipment must be kept clean at all times to insure against contamination. This area is supervised by a graduate chemist and other personnel to maintain the high standards of quality products These personnel are guided by PCA's Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and also Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) rules per FDA guidelines. Liquid Packaging PCA plans to liquid fill & package the MPAK dispenser per the require- ments of its customers. The liquid filling machines are standard in the trade that automatically fills the MPAK unit to the exact label contents or weight statement. The products involved will over-the- counter (OTC) drugs, i.e., Hydrocortisone Spray, Topical Anesthetic Spray, etc. Also, chemical specialty products, i.e., Eyeglass Cleaner, Breath Freshener, Deodorants, etc. All the products produced will be non-toxic to both human and animals. In order to produce OTC drug products, the PCA plant will be registered with the u.S. Dept of Food & Drug Administration as a "drug establishment" Dry Packaging: Dry packaging is the final MPAK phase. At this time, we have three different packaging options for our packaged product going out in commerce. 1- Bulk pack into a large master shipper. 2- Units packaged in decorated counter displays and then packed into a master shipper 3- Blister card packing We will probably use all three options per our customers requirements. Continued: From Initial Concept To Finished Product '),00 Lake Worth Hd Suite 20')B . lJke Worth FL 33~6~ . TLI (~()-) <)h,).II~O . 1',1" (10-) <)6,)-.PI4 POBox 3~')'i . Bridgeport, CT 066(1'; . Tel (203) 'IK+WJl ~ . 1';1" (20'1) '\)+0-10') XACKAGING Pg. 3/ 5 CONCEP'TS 'ASSOC. INC. F" ,,\' '\[ II Quality Assurance Dept.: To assure the quality of its production, the PCA facility will have a Quality Assurance Dept. to conform to FDA & EPA's requirement of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). This department and its personnel is charged with the responsibility to maintain strict quality control of every manufacturing operation from the molding of the virgin MPAK tube until the final dry packaging operation It will also have state of the art electronic analytical equipment to insure that the products produced are in complete specification to prescribed approved standards City of Boynton Beach Municipal Code N Performance Standards: #l-Noise: Sec. 15-8 Noise Control- PCA's manufacturing functions will only produce low level noise inside the building and absolutely no noise outside the building. PCA shall not be in violation of any provision contained within Sec 15-8 thru Sec. 15-8.8 of the City of Boynton Beach Municipal Code or applicable ordinances. #2-Vibrations: The PCA production equiPment such as the injection molding machines or liquid filling equipment are not capable of producing any percep- tible vibration inside or outside of the building. #3-Smoke,Dust, Dirt or other particulate matter: Since the PCA facity must conform to FDA's GMP regulations, we cannot have or tolerate any smoke, dust, dirt or other particulate matter within the plant environment. In fact, some areas such as the OTC drug liquid fill area will have special overhead filtration system to maintain the clean integrity of the area. #4-0dors & Fumes: While fragrant liquid products will be produced in this facility, we do not anticipate odors or fumes to be perceptible outside of the building. We do not anticipate making products that will generate fumes #5-Toxic or noxious matter Since all PCA products are either taken orally or used topically on the skin of humans, we cannot have toxic or noxious materials in the plant or be used in its products. #6-Fire and explosive hazards: The MPAK spray dispenser is a non-aerosol mechanical type pump that does not require any propellant for atomization. The liquid products being produced by PCA may require either tax paid pure alcohol or From Initial Concept To Finished Product Continued ';700 Lake Worth Rd Suite 2()'iB . Lake \\'()rth FL ~.3'I(,.3 . Tel (407) 96'i.lI.30 . Fax. Cia"") 96';.4714 POBox ~.3'i'1 . Bridgep()rl CT liilhO'i . Tel (2(H) .31;4.1;91.3 . Fax (20.3) .3.34.0'W'i XACKAGING Pg. 4/ 5 CONCEPTS 'ASSOC. INC. 1\1 " or specially denatured alcohol (SDA). While alcohol is flammable, PCA will work closely with the Boynton Beach Fire Dept. to store and use this commodity in conformance to Chapter 9 of the City of Boynton Beach, Code of Ordinances. PCA must also work closely with the D.S Bureau of AT&F, who regulates the use, shipment and storage of alcohol for non-beverage use. H7-Heat, humidity or glare: The PCA production equipment & machinery should not produce external heat, humidity or glare. In fact, the entire plant will be air condi- tioned with humidity controls since humidity can affect the quality of the offset printing process and other packaging operations H8-Liquid Waste. PCA does not anticipate having an excess of liquid waste. The only real liquid waste anticipated is the clean-up wash water for the cleanliness and sanitization of the compounding batch tanks and liquid filling lines between product runs. In order to prevent any liquid waste getting into the Boynton Beach city waste water collection system, a special liquid waste collection arrangement will be used. This waste will be pumped into a special large holding liquid waste tank to be pumped out by a private, approved disposal company. PCA shall not be in violation of any provision contained in See 26-112 thru See 26- 408 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. H9-Solid Waste The solid waste generated by PCA will be corrugated and other paper packaging waste together with misprinted, rejected printed plastic tubes suitable for recycling. No PCA solid waste will be in violation of Chapter 10 of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. HIO-Electromagnetic Interference. PCA has no equipment to cause or create radiation or other electro- magnetic interference in or outside the plant. HII-Hazardous materials & Waste As noted above, PCA will produce products for human consumption and use as OTC drugs, possibly prescription drugs and other cosmetic and specialty products. It is quite possible that PCA may dedicate a portion of the plant which will be segregated to produce a pesticide product, such as an Insect Repellent for topical human skin use. The area would be isolated together with the packaging equipment and wholly independent of the normal, human OTC productive area. If we elected to produce this type product we would have to register with EPA and be guided their regulations for pesticide products. As noted above, any hazardous waste material would be disposed of using private hazardous waste disposal companies. Continued. From Initial Concept To Finished Product 'i-OO Lalo.L Worth Rd <;uite 20'iB . Lake \X'orrh FL 33Q('3 . Tel (407) 96'i.1130 . Fax, (,iO-) 96'i-.i'14 I' 0 Bo, ~~'ii . Bridgerort CT Oh60'i . Tel (20~) ~H4.H91~ . Fax (2(n) ~~-i.O'IO'i ~AC Pg. 5/5 KAGIN G CONCEPTS 'ASSOC. INC. " I !-I" \ '\ \L " "I " I" J "[ I [- P Certification: Packaging Concepts Assoc. Inc , hereby certifies to be in compliance with each of the ten numbered portions of Paragraph N. on a continuing, permanent basis. Also, to hold harmless and indemnify (in perpetuity) the City of Boynton Beach from actions brought relating to activities outlined in Paragraph N, including but not limited to Consultant and Attorney fees, and provide irrevocable surety for each Note: PCA will respond to Sec. 11-3, "Environmental Review permits" of the City of Boynton Beach, Code of Ordinances separately and prior to the issuance of a building permit, as required by city codes Re~tfu~~l~ l; "f7 j / 'I --,-:4--k~f , 1/.1 ) ~ )/. '.. -, ... ~!- [ If_L//~~ t/ --.,/ 1'...,' . ;" -"'r.it,." U ''-../ . -__ Edwin I. stoltz, Ph.r'- Vice President & Technical Director cc: Mr. Philip Meshberg, President Mr. Jeff Lis, Catalfumo Construction Co. From Initial Concept To Finished Product 5700 Lake Worth Rd, Suite 205B . Lake Worth FL ~3'f('~ . Tel (.f!)-) <)(,').1 UO . Fax. (.jO-) 96').4714 POBox 3354 . Bridgeport CT 0660') . Tel (2(H) -\~'H{<) 1-\ . Fn (20-\) -\-\+0,.05 _ c fP 'W!,pC;~-_DI!'-; - J.~t"1 ~; ~ ~ I J,,J~JJ;:;dJ t~ rJ IW ~ FyJ- 10/';>'4/" 't?~ &/~dqr f.' 0 , ./ h J3t> I q r .}vtvtv ~o B~~ 'JIb Iq~/ ~,..v. v--l ; I J. -2/ q f :jJlV,# 1/:rlq5 'If:> ~~ Co~ [)~ 1/3/ Cf~ {, J :l"/4;( 0J~ cJq;{ ~ 1 q.'; ..,;)/1 c.. ~., <j>_j1J~ C- ~ Cr ~ ~ 9:> ~J.'j $ C/ f'I e,..fJ $- ol'f q c.- ~<f 15 -3D 7 C/ ~. q ;)_.) J t) V ~-r /4',>_/01 c lyvJ.. ~ , . . c,~ V (pIs') r- ~ r ?M""" 11 'i:; - .) 'i i C- ~/3olqt{ ---------------- MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-217 wm @' iJl-6 ',- .~" TO Tambri J Heyden, Planning & Zo . PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. (}\:\ {~ -{. ~l' ~v) , t...,........ rJ\V fJ}' ( ~^" ,\\ ~ \'J' (",\~r!' ~if f/I) tJ (fl ~ c/ FROM. John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities Date: July 3, 1995 SUBJECT Packaging Concepts, New Site Plan, Fint Review of 2nd Submittal Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1 A Capacity Reservation Fee will be required within thirty (30) days of City Commission approval. The fee amount will be determined based upon meter size or expected demand, (Sec. 26-34 [En. 2. Please provide expected maximum water demand for sizing of water meter, plan shows a 2" water service and a l"water meter 3 Please show existing or proposed fire hydrant location (s). Fire hydrants shall be within 200' of all points on every commercial building, (Appendix C, Art. X, Sec. 16) 4 Proposed relocation of Bay Trees onto existing utilities and into a Right of Way is not acceptable, (Sec. 7 5-18 1). It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404 sm xc. I Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella tIP' -- File time: 1 Assistant to the Director of Utilities: 5hr @ 25 67 per hr 2. Chief Field Inspector of Utilities: 1 Ohr @ 19 16 per hr V" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-106 ill m ~~I~ ~ '~Sm ill TO. Tambri J Heyden, Planning & Zonmg DIrector FROM. Robert Eichorst, PublIc Works Director SUBJ Site Plan Review - Packaging Concepts ('\1 r\~'~.l _1 r- t-jP ~> DATE June 26, 1995 In reference to the above site the southern most parking space should be elimmated to allow safe backmg of the SamtatIOn vehicles. If you have any questions contact Robert Eichorst, PublIc Works Director at 375-6201 ~_. REier f';:~.' p..v: MEMORANDUM TO 1'/4",{31\, l'irb~1 fLA;ff.4l.~ tZo.v.~' b,Rtc:.fOt't FROM: -S 0 fI,.; I.J .... b....l1<-, 1'Ml<>. S "'f>T ' ~ DATE ~/~f/1j RE Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans Project ~A<:'I\ItC~ ~7..Y j-IE"V$J' After reviewing the referenced project Department recommends the Planninq and consideration. Ulend~lans for the above 'l1e L CAM /(I)ItI ..J "Nz kJ tbat the project be forwarded to Development Board for their l. ... .;;. ~ ~. t: "Itd.ll nc't .....k"'('E'-n ~&;~ .:It i _ dt.'l ,...4if.i:.l. ',' I.., t, S 9n....'f~ ~~" ~ FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO 95-283 W ~ , TO Planning Department FROM Fire Department DATE June 23, 1995 RE Packaging Concepts 4925 Park Ridge Blvd NWSP 95-007 Provide fire hydrants at 1 The corner of Park Ridge Blvd and Beta Drive ,:/ m@rnDW~ JUN 2 11995 @! PLANNING AND ZmilNG DEPl Iv 2 S E corner of the property south of loading dock drive Please be advised plan review by William D Cavanaugh 1 5 hrs @ $24 08/hr x 35% = total $48 76 4i:e:-ta~~,~o ~~J~' '1 ! .9Z NI) ; ! ID~ TO' FROM. DATE. REF TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 26 JUNE 95 PACKAGING CONCEPTS MEMO #0149 I. have reviewed the above listed site ~2Jl9~ti~~jate ,problems or concerns at this time. . ?,<"~V lJ 7v.,~~ ./l ;r t ~..~ -t.. "." .....' '<:&.~ it f'^;~:'\J tx.~.::... .....~.. ~..... ~'. .~'" .~. .#^........ ......<>" ') "'< ':.. Respectfully, ~. $1 :~'~ { \\\ ~,.,.'L. h ~ ~ #-/;r)2 ~'<""x"x-i ,\, q if ,..,~~", ~\ V J .. -::.1 ~~~ic~~~:::: nSJ 1"'(5) ['eSJ fr,'--=,,\),.. ! r~):' ['~fJ ..~,~~,^<<' I J J L' ~ ~ .' lj \ l ,f 7 . .:~_~~,:,......' *...'1..". ~ ~...".,."'<,..~.:.<<:',~.':,::......... t.."i . ".-w... ;l-. "'<~;::::::...... tJ <. t1 , _ .... l<<~ ~, . ~ ~ , ~ t' ;:: i',i\ , " ~, , i' ~!." [' " , I =, ~ ~ $ \.."~,,,I i',".~::'~<~~~\ ~.,~ .....' " . ".:..:;.;7~ ...~ !> .~,;. " ~ ') .. .?.;:~~:........ t::.:J ..~)~ \ ~. l ~ ~~~~ f':l ~ ":,.::;> ~ ! l n l'l , (0) ':0':;. .......:-~y... ~ :; .', ~ ~ "-.............. ,.l l,~~ ~' p~~.', PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 95-307 FROM: Tambri J Heyden Planning and Zoning ~or Michael E Ha~ Site and ZOning~lOP ent Administrator June 30, 1995 TO- DATE: SUBJECT- Site Plan Project Location Applicant File No Review - 1st Review (New Site Plan) "Packaging Concepts Assoc Inc" 4925 Park Ridge Boulevard, Quantum Park Jeff Lis NWSP 95-007 The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the site plan review of the plans for the above-referenced project It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories, the first category is a list of comments that identifies deficiencies from the city's land development regulations (L DR) that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review, in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process The second set of comment(s) are recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development The applicant shall understand that all documents/plans submitted for site plan and/or permit review are subj ect to additional comments I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies and they request that the project remain on the review schedule identified in the attached letter, they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement I SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1 On the survey, add to the map legend a symbol that represents the property line of the subject property It appears the project site is part of a larger lot or lots 12 The set of plans have two drawings labeled site plan Re-title the plans accordingly 3 Please be advised that the property dimensions as shown on the "Boundary Survey dated May 22, 1995, drawn by Lidberg Land Survey Inc " do not match the boundary dimensions of the subject property as shown on the Palm Beach County Tax Map (1994) Contact the Engineering Division of the Development Department regarding the procedures to follow in subdividing land 4 For clarity in determining compliance with required setbacks, identify on the site plan (Drawing D95-222), Sheet 1 or 1) that the north side (facing Park Ridge Boulevard) is the front of the property [L DR, Chapter 2 - zoning, Section 7 H 16 ] 5 A clearance of eighteen (18) feet is required at the ingress to diagonal parking spaces The 18 feet dimension shall be identified from the ingress side of the first diagonal parking space to the entrance to the ingress access aisle where the diagonal parking spaces are located [L DR, Chapter 23 - Parking Lots, Article II, Section H 4 ] 6 Identify the narrowest width of the landscape strip proposed along the north property line, excluding the two (2) feet required for the eighteen (18) foot long parking space Note The minimum width of a landscape strip bordering a public right-of-way is five (5) feet, not Page 2 site Plan Review/1st Review "Packaging Concepts Assoc Inc" File NWSP 95-007 Memorandum No 95-307 including two (2) feet of grass space that is part of an eighteen (18) foot long parking space [L DR, Chapter 7 5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5 A & D and city standard drawing B-90012) 7 The length of the ninety (900) degree parking spaces, shown along the north property line of the project are identified as sixteen (16) feet overall; and included within the dimensioned area are wheel stops Therefore, the dimension from the wheelstops to the entrance of the parking space is fourteen (14) feet The minimum distance allowed for this area is sixteen (16) feet Amend the plans accordingly Also, extend the symbol that represents the two (2) foot portion of the parking space that is over a grass strip along all spaces that are shown sixteen (16) feet long (City standards Drawing B-90012 and B-90013) 8 There is an inconsistency in the dimensions as provided within both typical handicap parking stall drawings and the dimensions as provided on the site plan at the handicap parking stall The "typical" provides an overall dimension of eighteen point five (18 5) feet and the site plan is providing an overall dimension of eighteen (18) feet Please correct this inconsistency on the plans (City Standards Drawing B-90012 and B-90013) (Please note, when making corrections to the plans, the minimum dimensions for all ninety (900) degree and forty- five (450) degree parking stalls is 9 0' wide by and 18 O'long) 9 Within the landscaping requirements for this project there is no requirement for interior landscaping Please delete all references on the plans to "interior landscape required" 10 On the site plan, identify the width and length of all interior landscape islands Also, dimension the narrowest width of the landscape strip located along the west side of the north parking area Note The minimum width of the required landscape strip along abutting property is two point five (2 5) feet [L D R Chapter 7 5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5 E ] 11 Add the following notes to the general notes found on the plan that shows landscaping i On center spacing of required landscape material shall take precedence over quantities of material identified on the plan ii Fifty (50%) percent of the total number of required trees and shrubs required to comply with the code shall be a native specie [Comprehensive Plan policy 4 4 6 Native Specie Requirement and Chapter 7 5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5 C 3 ] 12 Revise the last general note on the landscape plan and the "substitutions" note on the landscape detail plan as follows All plant substitutions shall be approved by the City of Boynton Beach Page: 3 Site Plan Review/1st Review "Packaging concepts Assoc Inc" File NWSP 95-007 Memorandum No 95-307 13 On the landscape plan and plant list provide a distin- guishable symbol that represents the location and/or specie of the trees and hedges required to form the continuous barrier to screen the vehicle use area and the accent shrubs to screen the dumpster enclosure Place a typical dimension on the plan that represents the forty (40) foot on center spacing for the required trees along the right-of-way NOTE Fifty (50%) percent of the total number of trees and hedges required to comply with the code shall be a native specie and the minimum height at planting for trees is eight (8) feet [Comprehensive Plan Policy 4 4 6 Native Specie Requirement) and L D R Chapter 7 5, Article II Landscape Code, Section 5 C 2 and D ] 14 Identify the trees shown on the landscape plan on the plant list 15 Correct the discrepancy between the spacing of the required hedge landscape material identified in the landscape notes found on the landscape plan and the spacing identified on the plant list found on the landscape detail plan Note The maximum spacing of the hedge material required to form the continuous barrier to screen the vehicle use area is two (2) feet on center L D R Chapter 7 5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5 C 3 ,D and E ] 16 To avoid a conflict between the location of landscape material and the site lighting poles, pedestrian lighting, fire hydrants, drainage structures and other site appurtenances, show and label these improvements on the landscape plan, where applicable Also specify the overall height of the proposed site lighting poles 17 To properly evaluate the number of required parking spaces for this proposed use, please indicate on the parking data identified on the site plan the maximum number of shift hour employees 18 Please provide the following architectural plans as they have not been submitted and, therefore, not included within this first review a) Scaled floor plans for the proposed structure indicating the use within each space Also identify the number of stories tall the building is and whether there is a mezzanine b) Exterior elevations for the proposed structure indicating building height from finish grade to highest point on the building, exterior colors by color name, color number or designation and manufacture I s name, and identify the type of all exterior materials c) submit color samples (chips) matching the colors identified on the plans and submit colored elevation drawing showing all elevations of the bUilding (where applicable) with the colors matching the colors specified on the plans [L D R Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7 D 1 & 2 and Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 5 ] Page 4 Site Plan Review/1st Review "Packaging Concepts Assoc Inc" File NWSP 95-007 Memorandum No 95-307 19 Show and dimension on the landscape plan the safe sight triangles required by the zoning code and landscape code The triangles are required on both sides of each ingress/ egress and on the site at the intersection of Park Ridge Boulevard and Beta Drive Aleo specify, in note form, on the plans the unobstructed, cross visibility space required within the line-of-sight triangles [L DR, Chapter 7 5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5 H and Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 4 E ] 20 Relocate the hedge material along the north property line to outside of the two (2) foot grass area which is part of the parking space Also, relocate all the trees that are shown in easements See general note on landscape plan [City standard drawing B-90012] 21 On the dumpster detail drawing found on the site plan, specify that the color of the stucco walls will match the color of the building and identify the color of the gate screening [L DR, Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 10 E] 22 Submit for review building and site signage in compliance with the sign code and the Quantum sign program [L DR, Chapter 21 and Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, section 10 I] 23 The proposed use is being evaluated for consistency with the permitted uses allowed within the development and compliance with city codes 24 Relocate the loading area so that it does not front on a public road [L DR, Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 7 H 11 ] 25 Show on the site plan and elevation view drawings of the building, the location of the mechanical equipment proposed to be attached to the building or installed on the site, such as electrical transformers, roof top mechanical equipment Also, show on the appropriate plan the type, size, spacing and color of the material required to screen the equipment [L DR, Chapter 9, section 11 E) 26 Additional fees will be charged for the first review of second submittal II RECOMMENDATIONS 27 It is recommended that the cypress mulch be changed to melalueca mulch MEH arw . 1.tP.ck Con BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 95 - 220 July 6, 1995 TO Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM Al Newbold Deputy Building Official TRC COMMBNTS - 1st REVIEW OF 2nd SUBMITl'AL NEW SITE PLAN - PACKAGING CONCEPTS - QUANTUM PARK RE We have reviewed the new set of plans for the above referenced project and the comments we submitted in our memorandum 95-173 (attached) remain the same The cost for this additional review, including 35% for fringe benefits, is $71 17 AN bh Attachment XC William V Hukill, P E PACJl:AGIN TRC ',,- - ~ BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-173 June 6, 1995 From Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Site Plan Review - packaging Concepts 4925 Park Ridge Boulevard, Quantum Park To Re This project was reviewed as a 1,000 Sq Ft Office and 23,270 Sq Ft Packaging Building Since no floor plan was submitted, we must advise the applicant that, when the floor plan is submitted more openings such as doors, may be required to comply with the code Other comments are as follows 1 Handicap access route is required for pedestrians, per State Handicap Code All signs should comply with Quantum sign program or be approved with this Site Plan as a standard concept Only one free-standing sign is allowed Details for both the wall and free-standing signs must be submitted 2 3 4 Al~ AN mh cc William V Hukill, P E , Department of Development Director ll. PItQCON TRC , - ,~ .......... ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-199 DATE, June 22. 1995 (revised 6/30/95 on resubmittal), TO: T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR, I FROM. KEN HALL, ENG AIDE PHONE. 407-375-6283~ SUBJECT. PACKAGING CONCEPTS -1st REVIEW The following comments/recommendatIOns are submItted for yourrevlcw If any of the codc comments dIsallow the applicant to develop the sIte as submitted, the applIcant may request an exemption thru the planning department as stipulated in Chapter one, Article one, SectIOn eleven of the city's Land Development RegulatIons All plans submItted for speCific pcnmts shall meet the city's code reqUIrements at time of apphcatIon. These permIts mclude, but are not lImIted to the followmg: Site lIghting, Pavmg. Drainage. Curbing, Landscaping, 'rrigatlon, and Traffic Control Devices. Permits required from agencies such as the F DOT P B County, S F W.M D and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. COMMENTS 1 On east side of building, correct parking stall dimensions to agree with Citv standard drawing B-90013 2 Provide a sati,~factorv trqlfic control plan as required Chap 23 Art. lIB pg 23-7 3 Provide a cert(/ied drainage plan including calculations and details from a Florida registered engineer Chap 23 Art. IIF pg 23-8 4 Parcel requires replalting unless an exemption can be obtained ji"Om the Otv Engineer Chap5 Art. II Sect. J (Lot 47 has alreadv been subdivided four times) 5 Maximum width of east drivewal shall be 32 feet unless othelwise approved bv the Director qf Development Chap 23 Art.IIH 1 6 ReVise the parking dimenSIOns to reflect the city's standards along the east parkmg area. Chap 23, Art. 2/, pg. 23-8 RECOMMENDATIONS 1 Consider extending sidewalk along north parking stalls two/eet out to act as a continuous wheel stop /t eliminates tripping hazards associated with wheel stops and their maintenance packagmg concepts first review contd. pg. 2 2 Consider nme foot wide parking stalls if it will mcrease number of parking spaces. KRH/krh C Wilham Hukill, Dcv Dlr and to file. pkgcncpt.l rv RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-296 TO- Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM. Kevin J Ha1Iaban, ForesterlEnvironmenWist rJ vi Packing Concepts - Site Plan RE. DATE. July 5, 1995 The comment on the landscape plans addresses any existing trees on the site, The project should continue on the normal review process. No additional costs to the applicant for staff time, KH.ad '"" PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 95-254 DATE Carrie Parker, City Manager Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept Chief Field Insp Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Sgt Marlon Harris, Police Department Al Newbold, Building Division William Hukill, Director of Department of Development Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist --t; ~~f~ Tambril1' Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director June 2, 1995 TO FROM RE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1st Review - New Site Plan Project - Packaging Concepts Location - 4925 Park Ridge Boulevard, Quantum Park Applicant - Jeff Lis File No - NWSP 95-007 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above- referenced project Site Plan Review approval for this project will be granted by the City Commission To ensure that the project stays on line with the review time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and formal written comments transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5,00 P.M. on June 20. 1995. Do not return plans and exhibits Retain same for the review of the amended plans (second review) Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval 1 Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments 2 The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete based on the submittal requirements identified in Section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance However, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer through the planning and Zoning Department 3 Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents 4 Technical Review Committee member (s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements page 2 of 2 Packaging Concepts To TRC Members Re Planning & Zoning Memo 95-254 5 When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified 6 If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the applicant Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memo Michael E Haag will be the Planning and Zoning Department staff member coordinating the 1st review of the project The Planning and Zoning Department will send the applicant a cover letter which includes the comment(s) and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission When the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, they will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for review and approval TJH dim Attachment XC (Memo Only) Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director Thomas Dettman, Police Chief John Guidry, utilities Director Central File A 18tRBV PKG/TRC June 6, 1995 BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 95-173 To Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director From Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Re Site Plan Review - Packaging Concepts 4925 Park Ridge Boulevard, Quantum Park This project was reviewed as a 1,000 Sq Ft Office and 23,270 Sq Ft Packaging Building Since no floor plan was submitted, we must advise the applicant that, when the floor plan is submitted more openings such as doors, may be required to comply with the code Other comments are as follows 1 Handicap access route is required for pedestrians, per State Handicap Code 2 All signs should comply with Quantum sign program or be approved with this Site Plan as a standard concept 3 Only one free-standing sign is allowed Details for both the wall and free-standing signs must be submitted 4 AN mh ~ Al Ne bo d cc William V Hukill, P E , Department of Development Director A PI(GCON TRC /4- -- MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-192 TO Tambn J Heyden, Planrung & Zorung DIrector FROM. ~v John A. GUldry~ DIrector ofUtilitles Date June 8, 1995 SUBJECT Packaging Concepts, New Site Plan First Review Staffhas revIewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments. 1 A CapacIty ReservatIOn Fee will be reqUlred Wltlun tlurty (30) days of City Conurusslon approval, or upon request for my SIgnature on the HRS/DEP perrrut applicatIOns. The fee amount will be detemuned based upon meter SIze or expected demand, (Sec. 26-34 [ED 2 Please provIde expected maXImum water demand for slzmg of water meter, plan shows a 2" water servIce and a I" water meter 3 Please show eXIstmg or proposed fire hydrant locatIOn (s) Fire hydrants shall be Wltlun 200' of all pomts on every commercIal building, (AppendIx C, Art. X, Sec. 16) 4 Landscapmg plan sheet 1 of2 General Notes specIfies no trees will be placed m utihty easements, but the plan shows trees m utility easements. Please indIcate wluch IS correct, It IS our recommendatIOn that the plan proceed through the reVIew process. If you have any questIOns regardmg thIS subject, please contact Slap Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404 sm xc' Clyde "Slap" Milor Peter Mazzella File / -at t::-- !(D) ~ .~, _~6il ~ inJ __ -. I@, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-84 TO Tambn J Heyden, Plannmg & Zomng DIrector FROM Robert EIChorst, PublIc Works DIrector SUBJ New SIte Plan - Packagmg Concepts DATE June 5, 1995 The dumpster enclosure at the above sIte needs to be 10' X 10' and located dIfferently as to not block the entrance If you have any questIOns please contact me at 375-6201 from 7.00 AM to 3 30 PM, Monday thru Fnday OJ ?- / ' JJdJuLJ Robert EIChorst PublIc Works DIrector RElcr /I~ FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO 95-275 WDC TO Planning Department FROM Fire Department DATE June 2~, 1995 RE Packaging Concepts NWSP 95-~~7 4925 Park Ridge Blvd, Quantum Blvd Provide fire hydrants at 1 The corner of Park Ridge Blvd and Beta Drive 2 S E corner of the property south of loading dock drive d{,~ 7 L cavanaug / FPO TO. FROM. DATE REF ;J- TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING AND ZONING DIRECTOR SGT MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 JUNE 95 PACKAGING CONCEPTS MEMO #0145 I have revIewed the lIsted sIte plan and ,ti~d;;;fiq. prqb~erns ~p!u~..pomt. I dId not locate any lightmg plans to reVIew . ::: i'...../ "",:' ""':, ;IIespect. By, "."' M~/::, //!~ Sgt. Marlon Hams 14- ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-199 DATE, June 22.1995 TO. T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR, FROM. KEN HALL, ENG AIDE PHONE 407-375-6283 @ SUBJECT. PACKAGING CONCEPTS - 1st REVIEW The fol1owmg comments/recommendatIons are submitted for your review If any of the code comments disallow the applIcant to develop the site as submitted, the applIcant may request an exemptIon thru the planmng department as stipulated m Chapter one, Article one, SectIOn eleven of the city's Land Development RegulatIOns All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code reqUIrements at time of apphcatlOn. These permits mclude, but are not lImited to the fol1owmg: Site IIghtmg, Pavmg, Dramage, Curbmg, Landscapmg, IrngatlOn, and Traffic Control Devices. Permits requlfed from agencies such as the F DOT P B County, S F W M D., and any other permlttmg agency shal1 be mcluded With your permit request. COMMENTS 1 On east side (?( building, correct parkl1lg stall length }imn 16 Ii, to 18/i Otv standard drawing B-90012 2 Provide a satisfactorv traffic control plan as required Chap 23 Art. liB 3 Provide a certified drainage plan including calculations ji-om a Florida registered engineer Chap 23 Art. J/F 4 Parcel requires replatting unless an exemption can be obtained/i'om the Citv Engineer Chap5 Art. 11 Sect.l (Lot 47 has alreadv been subdivided fhur time,~) 5 Maximum width of east drivewav shall be 32 feet unless othelwise approved bv the Director of Development Chap 23 ArUIH 1 RECOMMENDATIONS 1 Consider moving curbing along east parking stalls twofeet out (eastward) to act as a continuous wheel stop It eliminates possible tripping hazard with individual wheel stops and .fiJture maintenance The same application could be applied to the north side of the building bv extending the width q(the sidewalk bv twoIeet KRH/krh C WillIam Hukll1, Dev Dlr and to file. IJV RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-272 ~roJ' R /Ii) ---~ ;1/1'1 u; Iv) f5 n I J f \.~ ~~ .r !!;, -_.,~- , '\ - '! nil' l I ! ~ l ~ f ; i , A i --.JiJ! I ; , L--_~ _,. , PL!,d ~'I~-'~ r F _cv ~~ ~ --.'.-'- ~ ''< ,)........'< ~"'--.... ---.~:........ -.-.......--..."""-~ TO Tambn Heyden, Plamng & Zomng DIrector KeVIn J Hallahan, Forester/EnvIronmentalIst //1 / d FROM. RE Packing Concepts DATE. June 20, 1995 The applIcant should make a comment on the eXIstence of desIrable trees on the sIte, especIally scrub habItat. The applIcant should also comment If the project will apply for mIrcrosItmg. June 17, 1996 .-- ill rn@rnu\YJ~ 001 JUN , 1116 I PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 96-225 TO Technical Review Committee Members Marshall Gage Bob Eichorst Charlie Frederick John Guidry Tambri Heyden Floyd Jordan Police Chief Public Works Director Recreation & Park Director Utilities Director Planning & Zoning Director Fire Chief FROM Don Johnson, Building Compliance Administrator RE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PACKAGING CONCEPTS Permit #95-4583 4925 PARK RIDGE BLVD CATAFULMO The above referenced project is nearing completion Prior to the Building Division issuing the Certificate of Occupancy, I would like to ensure that you do not have any outstanding or pending conditions concerning this site that must be rectified (excluding issues that are covered entirely with a city approved surety) If any outstanding conditions are related to permits issued by the Building Division, please provide this division a memorandum containing a description of the unresolved conditions If the unresolved conditions are not permit related, please notify the owner or the owner's agent to ensure that the matters are rectified Please respond to me, within ten (10) days in order that we may proceed in a timely manner to issue the Certificate of Occupancy No response is necessary if your department is satisfied with the current state of the above referenced site Thank you for your cooperation ~ ~ i ,~ Don Joh on JY --' ~ ! I ~ j/r)f.vlf q~r-'~' v6 r ~ ~y ?1/ XC Carrie Parker Kevin Hallahan Jim DuVall A TRCMEMO