CORRESPONDENCE
03/27/01 TUE 16 04 FAX 561 740 2429 Ql.'A.\iTnr
---
!lJ 002/003
Architectural Review Committee
QuanhJm Park Property Owners' ASloclatlon. Inc
2500 Quantum Lakes Drive. Suite 100
Boynton leach. fL 33426
March 27, 2001
Mr Winston Lee. Agent
1532 Old Okeechobee R.oad, Suite 1 06
West Palm Beach, FL 33409-5270
RE. P 1M AssociateslP8Ckaging Concepts
Lots 47Bt C. and D
Quantum Corporate Park
Dear Mr Lee:
We lU"e pleased to inform you that the Architectural Review Coumuttee has reviewed and
approved the follo\\int; plans:
.:. Paving & DraUlage Conceptual Plan, Sheet I of I, dated Jan 200 I, rcvis=d 2fl2101
0) Water &. S~, SheBt lof 1, datedJan 200], revised 2/12101
<. Site Plan, Sbcct SP 1 of2, dated 01108/01, revised 02/16/01
-:. Site Plan Details, Shoet SP 2 of 2, dated 01108/01, revised 02116101
<. Planting Plans, Shcc:t PP I of2, dated 01108/01, revisee 02/16/01
-:. Landscape Specifications 8c Details. 01/08101
.:. Floor PJan. Sheet A-I, dated 01/08101, revised ()2I19/01
<. Elc.waticust Sheet A-2, dated 01108101, revISed ()2119/0]
0) ReviscdEntry. SheetA-3, dated OIl08l0l, revised 02/19101
The above approval is conditioned upon the timely submittal of the do~uments described
below
The driveway(s) shall be sleeved for future irrigation pipelines and control wires.
The sleeve SIZe, location, depth and material shall be as determmed by the
Quantum Community Development District and shown on the construction
drawings submitted to the QCDO for construction pennit approval,
2. Compliance with the UOuJdelines for the Preparation of Tenant Hamrdous
Materials Contamination Response PIanU as Development Order Condition No.
16 shaU be demonstrated to the Quantum Park Property Ov.ners' Association
(QPOA) prIOr to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
03 27/01 TUE 16 04 FAX 561 740 2429 QUANTml
~003/003
3 Please provide a draft copy of the proposed response plan for review by the
QPOA prior to the comnencement of COnstrw;tlOI1.
4 Pursuant to the Development Order (City Ordinance 84-51), the QPOA
Declaration of Protective Covenants and the Architectural Review Committee
approval, be advised of your responsibility to comply fully with these and all
other City, State and Federal requirements.
If you should have my further questiOIlS, please feel free to contact me at any time at
561-740-2447
Sincerely,
~
~~
Julie Finch
Architectural Review CollU71ittee
F.QulntUm I'OA~l Review C:Jll1mi':i...\ApprovaI tdtm\Plck:agil& Coac.el'ts 47B.dx
t
I
~inston
ee
SSOclates, Inc.
I .1I11hL.ll'l' \rLhlk,"lI L
I [1.1 PI.mrllll
I "I nl ( (
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
VIA Hand Delivery
DATE March 22, 2001
ATTENTION Enc Johnson
JOB NO 98010
JOB NAME Packaging Concepts
Expansion
~ FROM Jonl Brinkman, AICP
~
We are sending you the following Items via Hand Delivery
No of Copies Description
1 set Reduced 8 % x 11 copies of the site plan, archltecturals and planttng plans
for the above referenced proJect.
Remarks. " For Approval For Review and [] Reply ASAP [J Please Comment
w
Comment
X As Requested c For Signature For your record . , Distribution
L-J
Signed" ~ ./) -"
Copy To' jL.:Yt-t.JLlt::/yU/f....... --
I" 2 ()id (Jkccc!i"hcc Road. ')Ui:( lOll \\ ',t Palm f3c~h.h ri' or) "2-1)
1 j 1..... ) ..t.r -I' t 1 h q .c;:,,~ t" n1ar! \\ In....ttln ,j rn
I
~inston
ee .
sSOclates, Inc.
[ .1I!(hL1P~ \1 11Ill',llJrl'
I and Planlllll.!2
I. '> I 1 (( h
February 20 2000
Mr MIchael W Rumpf
CIty of Boynton Beach
Dept. of Development
Planmng & Zomng DIVISion
100 E Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE Quantum Park DR! (Lots 47) - P JM Associates
Packagmg Concepts ExpansIon
File Number NWSP 01-001
Our FIle No 98010
Dear Mr Rumpf,
Attached please find 10 sets of plans for the above referenced project, revIsed pursuant to the TRC
comments I have addressed each mdiVldual comment as follows
PUBLIC \VORKS - General
No Comments
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comment: The dnveway accessmg the VISitor parkmg lot on the cul-de-sac bulb should be
restncted such that left turns out of the dnveway on Beta Dnve are not allowed. Staff IS
concerned that motonsts eXlstmg thIS dnveway wIll turn left and travel m a dIrectIOn that
IS opposmg oncommg traffic Most motonsts correctly treat cul-de-sacs with an Island as
one-way traffic flow m a counterclockwise manner The same restrictIOn should be placed
on the dnveway of the employee parkmg lot as well
Response: A stop Sign. stop bar and nght turn only sign have been added at the dnveways
accessmg both the VISItor and employee parkmg lots from the cul-de-sac on Beta Dnve.
2 Comment: The landscapmg on the north sIde of the dnveway referenced above should be
further restncted, The sIght trIangle as proposed IS not sufficient to proVIde an adequate
Sight Ime between eXIstmg vehicles and vehIcles travelIng southbound on Beta Dnve The
consultant should re-evaluate thIS SItuatIOn and offer a remedy
"'2 lid ( I.....e he hee R,',:cl. '>llltl. I (I() \\e~t Palm fkach. fL "-+Ol! ~2"7n
f' .~ - f" "11 ""~) nall \\H1.,t'I1\\1 , llm
Mr Michael Rumpf
February 20, 2001
Page 2
Response: The landscape m the area has been reconfigured and an adequate sIght Ime has
been indIcated on the plan. All plant matenals m the area of the safe SIght corner shall
comply wIth code reqUirements.
UTILITIES
3 Comment: In general, palm trees will be the only tree specIes allowed wIthm any areas wIth
utilIty easements. Canopy trees may be planted outsIde of the easement so that roots and
branches wIll not Impact those utIlItIes wIthm the easement m the foreseeable future LDR
Sec. 7.5-18 1 gIves publIc utilIties the authonty to remove any trees that mterfere WIth utilIty
services, eIther m utilIty easements of public nghts-of-way Please mdIcate whether the
Wodyea blfurcata (WB tree (Foxtail Palm) root structure will cause problems WIth the
proposed water servIce lateral and fire lme.
Response: FoxtaIl Palms are a small palm WIth a root system less extensive than the Sabal
Palm. However, the palms have been shIfted away from the lInes.
4 Comment: Palm Beach County Health Dept. permits may be reqUired for the water and
sewer laterals servmg thIS proJect. (Sec 26-12) The fire lIne will require a PBCHD permit.
Response: A permIt applIcatIOn WIll be made to the Palm Beach County Health Dept. upon
approval from the UtilIty Dept.
FIRE
5 Comment: A fire hydrant flow test IS reqUired (LDR 6-16).
Response: A fire hydrant test will be requested.
6 Comment: No part of the structure may be more than two hundred (200) feet from a
hydrant. LDR 6-16
Response: A fire hydrant has been added so that the entIre structure and chemical storage
area are ~lthm 200 feet of a hydrant.
7 Comment: The chemIcal storage buildmg must have a curb to prevent run-off flow towards
any structure. NFP A 30
Response: Sheet A-2 shows an elevation of the open chemical storage area WIth a concrete
contamment curb at the pen meter We have added a note to prOVIde a spnnkler system for
thIS area.
8 Comment: The enclosed storage area must conform to NFP A 30
Response: Sheet A-2 shows an elevatIon ofthe open chemical storage area WIth a concrete
contamment curb at the penmeter We have added a note to proVIde a spnnkler system for
thIS area.
Mr MIchael Rumpf
February 20, 2001
Page 3
9 Comment: EXIstmg recessed entry may be modIfied but must remam an eXIt. NFP A 101
Response: The reVISIons to the eXIstmg entry do not modIfy the exIt as It relates to NFP A
10 1 and the word eXIt was added to the plans (Sheet A-3)
10 Comment: ChemIcal storage area IS too far from a hydrant.
Response: A fire hydrant has been added so that the entire structure and chemIcal storage
area are wIthm 200 feet of a hydrant.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
11 Comment: The thIrd dnveway on Beta Dnve wIll reqUIre a commISSIOn approved vanance
per LDR Chapter 23, ArtIcle II.R.
Response: A vanance applIcatIon was submItted WIth the sIte plan revIew applIcation. Both
apphcatIOns will be processed concurrently
12 Comment: Show on both the SIte and CIvIl Plans that the SIdewalk m front of the H/C
accessible path IS at the same elevatIon as the parkmg lot WIth an appropnate ramp up
towards the bUIldmg entrance per Flonda AccessibIltty Code.
Response: A note has been added to the plans that the SIdewalk m front of the H/e
accessible path IS flush WIth the parkmg.
13 Comment: Locate the french dram system outside of the 15 foot utihty easement per LDR
Chapter 6, ArtIcle 4, SectIOn 6.A.
Response' The french dram system has been moved outsIde of the 15 foot UtIltty easement.
14 Comment: Show all traffic control deVIces on both the SIte and CIvil Plans per LDR
Chapter 4, SectIOn 7.B
a. Stop SIgns and nght turn only SIgnS at both egress dnveways onto Beta Dnve.
b Stop SIgn and "Do Not Enter" SIgn at the end of the eXIstmg, one-way dnve
c Stop SIgn at north egress aIsle of the proposed 15 space parkmg area.
Response: The reqUired traffic control deVIces have been added to the plans
15 Comment: Separate permIts are reqUIred for clearmg/grubbmg and excavatIOn/fill
operations.
Response: The apphcant acknowledges that these permIts are reqUIred.
16 Comment: ProVIde clanficatIOn regardmg dISpoSItIon of the truckwell storm water
Response: The eXlstmg truckwell stormwater systems will need to be removed due to
conflIct WIth the proposed buildmg. A portable pump will be used to remove any
storm water runoff that may enter the truckwell from the parkmg lot.
Mr MIchael Rumpf
February 20, 2001
Page 4
17 Comment: ProvIde bnef explanatIOn regardIng the two "future silos and the matenals to
be placed In the chemIca] storage facJllty"
Response: These silos were approved by the Boynton Beach CIty CommISSIOn on September
19 1995 at thIS general locatIOn. The SIlos WIll contaIn plastiC beads. Alcohol IS the
chemIcal that IS stored In the chemIcal storage faCIlIty Please note thIS IS currently
permItted and eX1stmg and IS proposed to be relocated.
BUILDING DIVISION
18 Comment: On the floor plan draWIng, add a labeled symbol that identIfies the locatIOn of
the handIcap accessible entrance door to the bUIldmg. The locatIOn of the door shall match
the location of the accessible entrance doors that are depicted on the Site plan draWIng.
Flonda Accessibility Code for BuildIng COnstructIOn, SectIOn 4 1.2, 4.3
Response: Notes were added to sheet A-I showmg the handIcap entnes.
19 Comment: As reqUired by Chapter 4, SectIOn 7 ofthe LDR's, submIt a floor plan draWIng.
The bUIldmg plans are not bemg reViewed for comphance WIth the apphcable buildmg
codes Therefore, add the words. "Floor plan layout IS conceptual" below the draWIng titled
Floor Plan found on sheet A-I However, add to the floor plan draWIng a labeled symbol that
identIfies the location ofthe handicap accessible entrance door to the bUIldmg. The locatIOn
of the door shall match the locatIOn of the accessible entrance door to the buildmg. The
locatIon of the door shall match the location of the accessible entrance door that IS depIcted
on the Site plan draWIng.
Response: The words "floor plan layout IS conceptual" and notes shOWIng the handIcap
entnes were added to Sheet A-I
20 Comment: Place a note on the elevation View draWIng mdicatIng that the wall opemng and
wall construction comply WIth Table 600 of the 1997 edItIOn of the Standard BUIldmg Code.
Response: A note on sheet A-2 was added mdIcatIng that wall constructIOn and opemngs
shall comply WIth Table 600, 1997 SBC Adjacent bUIldmgs are m excess of the mmimum
30' as shown m thIS table.
21 Comment: On all t100r plan draWIngs, IndIcate WIthin the footpnnt of the building the
number of stones that are In the buildmg mcludmg, where apphcable, mezzamnes.
Response: Sheet A-I now mdIcates a one story bUIldmg.
22 Comment: Indicate on the t100r plan draWIng WIthm the footpnnt of the bUIldmg the
pnmary use of the structure/facihty If the buildIng 15 an expanSions of an eXIstIng buildmg,
mdlcate WIthm the footpnnt of the new and eXistIng bUIldmg the pnmary use of the
structure/facility
Response: Sheet A-I mdicates uses m eXistmg buddmg and proposed use of expansIOn.
Mr Michael Rumpf
February 20,2001
Page 5
23 Comment: IdentIfy on the SIte plan drawIng the actual dIstance that the buildIng IS set back
from the north, east, south and west property lmes. Please note that overhangs, covered
walkways, canopIes, aWlllngs or other appurtenance that are attached to the bUildIng shall
be consIdered when IdentIfymg buildmg setbacks Therefore, IdentIfy the Width of the
proposed overhangs, covered walkways, canopIes, aWlllngs, and/or other roofed areas that
extend out beyond the mam walls of the buildmg. The buildmg setbacks shall comply With
setback regulatIOns specIfied In the Zomng Code IdentIfy whether the area located on the
east SIde of the buildmg IS covered. Also, IndIcate the use of the area.
Response: Setback dIstances are IndIcated on the SIte plan. Any overhangs, covered
walkways, canopIes, aWlllngs or other appurtenances have been consIdered when depIctIng
these setbacks.
24 Comment: To venfY that the proposed buildmg IS m comphance With the apphcable
bUIldmgs setbacks, show dImenSIOns on the SIte plan the WIdth of the bUIldmg overhang.
Also, IdentIfy the SIze or Width of the covered walkway, a\\<nmgs, canopIes, and/or other
roofed areas that extend out beyond the mam walls of the bUIldmg.
Response: The buildIng has no overhang. Any appurtenances have been mdIcated on the
SIte plan and the setbacks are measured from same
25 Comment: At the tIme of permIt reVIew proVIde a completed and executed CIty Ulllty of
Title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combmed as one lot. A copy
ofthe recorded deed WIth legal descnpt10n of each property that IS bemg ulllfied IS reqUired
to be submItted to process the form. The property owner that IS IdentIfied on each deed shall
match.
Response: The apphcant agrees to proVIde an executed CIty Ulllty of Title form at tIme of
buddmg permIt reVIew
26 Comment: At tIme of permIt reVIew, submIt SIgned and sealed workmg drawmgs of the
proposed constructIOn.
Response: All constructIOn drawmgs submItted for permIt reVIew will be SIgned and sealed
by the apphcable profeSSIOnals.
27 Comment: Add to all plan VIew drawmgs of the SIte a labeled symbol that represents the
locatIOn and pen meter of the lImIts of constructIon proposed WIth the subject request.
Response: The hmlts of constructIon have been IdentIfied on the plans.
PARKS & RECREATION.
No comments.
Mr MIChael Rumpf
February 20, 2001
Page 6
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST:
28 Comment: The boundary and topographIc survey sheet mdIcated the followmg desIrable
trees on the sIte
Name of Tree
Ouantity of existinl: trees
Total
33
16
.2
52 trees
Cabbage Palm
Pme (Slash)
Oak (LlVe)
The landscape plans mdIcate the preservation of one (I) Cabbage Palm and three (3) Pme
trees.
The applIcant must perform the followmg m accordance With the Tree Preservation
Ordmance (EnvIronmental Chapter 7 5).
Name of Tree
Ouantity of existinl: trees Activity to perform
Cabbage Palm
Pme (Slash)
Oak (LIVe)
33 Relocate to rear property (32)
16 Show removal/replacement (13)
3 Relocate to rear property
Add thIS mformatIOn to the landscape plan.
Response: None of the above referenced trees can reasonably be relocated on SIte The
"rear" property IS encumbered by a SFWMD draInage easement and landscapmg IS
prohibIted. ApplIcant proposes to credIt tree removal WIth proposed plantmgs as shown.
POLICE
No comments.
PLANNING AND ZONING
29 Comment: IndIcate the number of handIcapped spaces reqrnred and proVIde under "SIte
Data" on sheet SP 1 of 2 (Ch. 4 Sect 7).
Response: This mformatIOn has been proVIded m the SIte data.
30 Comment: ModIfY the note regardmg roof mounted eqrnpment to say that roof mounted
eqrnpment shall be screened from SIght WIthm 600 feet. (Ch. 9 Sec. 11 E.)
Mr Michael Rumpf
February 20, 2001
Page 7
31
32.
33
34
35
Response: Sheet A-2 now mdIcates that all roof mounted eqUIpment shall not be vIsible
Wlthm 600' and screened.
Comment: ProvIde dImenSIons for new wall sIgnage. (Ch. 21)
Response: SIgnage SIze IS now mdIcated on sheet A-2.
Comment: The landscape buffer of seven (7) feet IS reqUired adjacent to Beta Dnve Also
tree spacmg IS to be proVided at one (1) tree per 30 lIneal feet. (Ch. 7 5, ArtIcle n, Sec 5D)
Response: The plans have been reVIsed to show the reqUired seven (7) foot buffer adjacent
to Beta Dnve and the number of trees has been mcreased to one (1) tree per 30 lInear feet.
Comment: The two (2) foot parkmg stall along Beta Dnve cannot encroach mto the seven
(7) foot reqUIred landscape buffer area. (CIty Drawmg B-90012)
Response: The plans have been reVIsed to ehmmate thIS encroachment.
Comment: IndIcate buildmg colors by manufacturer's name and number on the elevatIOn
drawmgs. Colors and matenals must match eXIsting buildmg (Ch. 4 Sec 7)
Response: The architect of record has coordmated WIth Planmng & ZOnIng, and smce the
exact color of the eX1stmg buildmg IS not known, a note has been added mdlCatmg that the
color shall exactly match the eXIstmg buildmg - see Sheet A-2.
Comment: ProvIde square footage and dImenSIons for the chemical storage area shown on
the SIte plans. (Ch. 4 Sec 7)
Response: Sheet A-I and the SIte Plan mdIcate the square footage of the open chemIcal
storage
36
Comment: An envlfonmental reVIew permIt may be reqUIred for the chemical storage. (Ch.
2 Sec 7)
Response: A request to modIfY the eXlstmg (1997) environmental permIt for the SIte will be
submItted to the CIty
37
Comment: Dnveway separation for a PID IS a minImum of 150 feet. Two (2) vanances are
reqUired for the dnveway locatIOns as proposed on the site plan. (Ch.2 Sec 74.3)
Response. A vanance appbcatIon was submitted \\1th the site plan review applIcatIOn.
Both apphcatIOns Will be processed concurrently
38
Comment: ProvIde stop SIgnS and "RIght Turn Only" SIgnS at the two (2) proposed
entrances on the Beta Dnve cul-de-sac (Ch.4 Sec 7)
Response: A stop SIgn, stop bar, and "nght turn only" SIgn have been added at the
dnveways accessmg both the VISItor and employee parkmg lots from the cul-de-sac on Beta
Dnve
Mr Michael Rumpf
February 20,2001
Page 8
39 Comment: Indicate the source of water for IrngatlOn on the landscape plan. (Ch. 7 5, Article
II)
Response: The ungatlOn system Will be extended off of the eXlstmg ungatlOn system which
utIlizes a well.
I beh ve that all TRC comments have been addressed and respectfully request that thiS apphcatlOn
proc d forward to the next available Planmng & Development Board Meetmg.
I ., ~
Wmst n Lee, ASLA, AICP
President
cc
Phlhp Meshberg, PJM Associates
Denms Bleakley, PJM Associates
Jeff Gapstur, Architectural DeSign ASSOCiates
Cherne Sova, CIvil SCIentific
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
PO. Box 21229
West Palm Beach. FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000
WWw.co palm-beachfLus
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Warren H. l\ewell. Chairman
Carol A. Roberts. Vice Chair
Karen T Marcus
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Tony Masilottl
Addie L. Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
An Equal Opportv.nity
Affirmative Action Employer
@ printed on recycled paper
"
",,' ;
I ,.
'UUI JAN I 1 U,
&~i'
~-_.--- .....
f<-
ZU;,. :""...... _
January 9 2001
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE.
PJM 8. Associates - Quantum Park, Parcels 47A,47B.47D, and 470
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr Rumpf'
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement (received
on January 8,2000) forthe project entitled; PJM & Associates- Quantum Park. Parcels
47A.47B.47C,and 47D. pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of
the Palm Beach County Land Development Code The project is summarized as
follows.
Location
Municipality'
Existing Uses:
Proposed Uses:
New Daily Trips:
Build-out Year'
South side of Park Ridge Blvd, west of Beta Drive
Boynton Beach
None
28,000 SF Industrial
195
nla
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the project is part of the
previously approved Quantum Park DRI and therefore meets the Traffic Performance
Standards of Palm Beach County
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
//7
~
Masoud Atefi, MSCE /
Sr Engineer - TratuCDivision
cc: Pinder-Troutman Consulting Inc.
File: General- TPS - Mun Traffic Study Review
F'\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Approvals\01 01 OS.doc
01/10/2~e1 10 a0. 1-5El-583-5559
i\!I NS"'Ul LEE
PAGE 131
I~.
IDston
~~ociates~ Inc.
-
Landscape Ar..hitecture
Land P18nniog
F.S.L .,l,C Cllt;
FAX MEMORANDUM
DATE: Januarv10, 2001
TO' Michael Rumpf
FROM Joni Brinkman, AICP
RE Packaging Concepts
Quantum Park Lots 47, B. C, & D
Our File No. 98-010 15
No. of Pages (including cover). 4
A site plan and variance application submittal was made yesterday to the City for the
above referenced project. Subsequently, it came to our attention that there was an error
on the number of driveway connections indicated for Beta Drive The discrepancy has
been corrected in the attached traffic statement. This revision did not affect the number
of trips generated by the proposed project. You win receive the original signed and
sealed copy for your files via mail.
Please call if you have any questions or require further information.
CC' Philip Meshberg
Dennis Bleakley
1532 Old OkeecilObec, Road, Suite 106, West Palm 3each, FL. };'W9-5270
561-6l39-~670 . Fax 56l-6S9-'i<;59
8. '10, :2i?el H.\ ~fj
1-51:1-58'3-555Q
\J.IIHSTO~j ~EE
PAGE 02
Pf"DER TItOUTHAtI COHSULTIHG. 'HC.
Transportatlon Planners and Engmeers
2324 South Congress Avenue, SuIte lH
West Palm Beach, FL 3~406
(501) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663
Email.pindertrQutrr.an@rnsn.com
jaouary 5, 2001
Rev.sed JanUary 9 2001
Mr Michael Rumpf
Plannmg and Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, Fl 33425-0310
Re: Quantum Pa.rk Lots 47A, 478, 47C, 470 - #PTCOO-l72
PJM & Associates - Packaging Concepts
Dear Mr Rum of.
,
It is proposed to expand the development on Lot 4'" of Qu~nturn Park m the City of Boynton Beach
The site is located on the south side of Park Ridge Boulevard east of the Boynton Beach High School
It is proposed to expand the existing 25,638 SF buildi;"lg by 23 000 for a tot.a! of 53 838 SF for PJM &
Associates. Aecas!. to the <,Ite is via one (] drivE'vva-y connection to Park Ridge Boulnard and three
(3) connections to Beta Drive.
The proposed expansion is estimated to generate 195 caily trips, 2b AM peak hour trips and 27 PM
peak hour tnps as shown on Attachment 1 Driveway vo!um€s for the tot.al of 53,838 SF building are
provided on Attachment 2
The Quantum Park DRI is an approved proJect, d1d is considered a PI"E'ViOllS Approval under Article
-15, Traffic Performance Standards, of rhe Palm Beach Count} Unified Land Development Code
(Ul.OC) The pl'Oposed land use a!~d intensity are withIn thp ! mils c the onginal approval of the
Quantum Park DR' a$ spown on Attachment ~ therefore, the proposer! pro,ec:. is not subject to the
Traffic PerforTlance Standard!'
If )Ou have any &;;~t!0"~~ regarding the contents of t\ii'i letter do not hesitate to contact: this office.
... -~.....
r-- ._~ ~ ----
Smc~ , -:.. -;:~:-
;.. :~ J;tf.J.~~~~ '
1'>~/7;;' ~1!
~ P"L~~ _f':-. ~,..
~~~J\,-:;rr~~i~.t-'..'"::'~ /~h/
resld~~ _ -" .:-.... I
..... -.:
. -.... .
- '
Attachm~ni
cc, Masoud Atefi
Philip Meschberg
I.titrBr Rumploo-r72 '-9-0r
Pi
e~/10/2ee1 10 ae
1-5El-6S'=1-555'=l
WINS-ON LEE
PAGE 03
Attachment 1
Quantum Park Lot 47 ~ PJM & Associates Expansion
Trip Generation
#PTCOO-172
1/9/01
tripgen
Page 1 of 1
Daily
Land Use Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips
Industrial 28,000 SF 6.97 11,000 SF 195
TOTAL 23,000 SF 195
AM Peak Hour
Total Tri )5
Land Use I nten5 ity Trip Cefl4l!I'ation Ratg (2) In Out Total
Industrial 28,000 SF 0.92 /1 ,00) SF (68/12) 23 3 26
TOTAL 26,000 SF 23 3 26
PM Peak Hour
TotaJ Yri ~
land Ute Intensity Trip Generation Rate (2) In Out Total
Industrial 28,000 SF 0.98/1 000 SF l12/88) 3 24 27
TOTAl 28,000 SF 3 24 27
(1) Source: Section 10.8, Fail' Share Road Impact F~s, of the Palm Bead, County Unified Land Dewlopment Cr.lde.
(2) Source: Institute ofTransportation El'lgi>1eers (ITF;, Trip Qerwrati~:!2 6th Edition
0'
~
el,le/2e01 10 00
1-551-52~_-555<3
V. It'CTO'l LEE
I
l
----- ---..........
~/ ....~.....
I
I
\
11 (z)
.
...-~
No
-'
~I
i
\
\
\.
i
I
I
/
./
~ ------//'~
/7-
PARK RIDGE BLVD
i~
'<
. ~
::5
i
I'
J
, I
! I r
94 if
37 11. .""
!
-jt\ \
94
SITE
150
LEGEND
2o\M PEAK HOU R
PROJECT TRAFFIC
(19) rt\.1 PEAK HOUR
PROJECT TRAFFIC
150 . DAILY PROjECT TRAFFIC
L
NOTE: INClUD~S ESTIMATED VOl tlMES
FOR EXISTINC BUilDl1\lC.
- -
N.T.S
/'~
/ ....,,,
,
/
.~I
NI
:':i
....
I
I
(
..J
/\
/'
/ \
:2 (12)t
/
/
" /
'----------
~,
,.
I"
l
~!
..,
-
''-.j
\
\
OH) t
\
'... /
"- -~~-~
\
\ /....---.......~
\
\ "\.
'.
.......1 \ \
~I
eQ'
..... ! \.
; .J
,
I ,
I
I
I 2 (191.
i
\
\
'\ /
/
"- /'
....... ------------
QUANTUM PARK
INDUSTRIAL - LOT 47
ATTACHMENT 2
PROJECT DRIVE\^lAY VOLUMES
FAG;: 134
u
\
\
\
\
"
~
\
\
j
!
I
i
I
i
I
I
~ 1/9J01
~