CORRESPONDENCE
FROM HENDRlK S DEMELLO AlA
PHONE NO. 954 4180606
MAR. 05 1939 12 ~PM Pi
Jim Ngyen
Development Department
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: The Original Pancake HOl,J5e
Gateway Blvd.
Permit #..93-13Z1
,q B -' 3\ 1.7 <f '" 5'13
Please be wonned that The Original Pancake House building was- designed to have all roof top
equipment screened by the parapet walls to a distance of up to 600 feet from the building.
If you have anyquestions, please do not hesitate to contact our office,
Smcerelv,.....c
.;tt- 1111.,
.' ~.:< "1
...,. ~"';i:~\.r ~.f.'" ~
~ - "'..' 7 i-'" "'... L'
[:~.d'. L~N:~~
: 1mbM ~cbil;ectU1!l'~ng, Inc.
:7''C' ~.:
. ~.':' ~-. ~-
~.. -~.. 'j-
. af~ ~.~ ~':
_.,,.. - -
.. ...-'~' -.....\ " '." ~......" ..
'" ',J.. ~ " -~ ..
I,. ~~....ft..... A"-"'lI. .,,:fIt
,; <l.{'.... ~\..'\..
~" .../.,,: " ~ ..'
,~ ~~ ~ .,.
~ HH".r\'
r~
"'.
~"'"
.,;
uo South Federal Hifhway Suit~ 202 Ourfield B~"b Florida 334041 954/418.0606 f:954 1418 -0022
12/15/1998 14 44
5513755054
CITY ATTORNE'r
PAGE 01
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
100 EAST BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
P.O BOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH 33425-0310
Phone(S61)742~SO
Fax(561)742~54
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER. SHEET
TO: Bulent 1 Kastarlak
FAX NUMBER: 6259
FROM: James A. Cherof, Esq.
RE: OPH - Cross Easement, Parking Drainage Agreement
DATE: December 15, 1998
This facsimile transmission contains 1 p,~(s), Including the cover sheet.
The Information contained In this facsimile message and the pages following are attorney privileged and
confldentlallnformltion intended only for the U5e d the Indlvidull or entity named above. If the reader of
this mess.ge is not the Intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disseml~on, distribution, or
copy d this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have rec@iW!d this communication In error, please
immediately notlty uS by telephone and return the original message to us at the above address via the U.S.
Postal Service. Thank you.
If any problems OC(ur in receiving this message, please ca. this office at (561) 7<42-6050
12/15/1998 14 44
5513755054
C ITV ATTORNEY
MEMORANDUM
December 15, 1998
TO'
FROM
Bulent I Kastarlak, Director of Development
~_mes_ A. Cherot, City Attomey~ J;U)
Orl Inal Pancake House Cross Easement, Parking Drainage
Agreemen
RE.
I have reviewed the Reciprocal Easement Agreement between Boynton Beach
Hospitality L TO , and OPH/Boynton Beach Realty, L.C. provided under cover of
your Memorandum 0098-382 The Agreement is legally sufficient to satisfy
condition of approval No. 3
JAC/ral
5:a1~oPH ~_.
PAGE 132
ill uu n ~n
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT
August 5, 1998
J ( ) I ~ .. c r'rJ"!"'I1I !:_
Richard W Carlson, Jr., Esq.
r-\ \ 2377 Crawford Court
\ I' I \ Lantana, FL 33462-2511
! i \ i Phone (561) 433-0172
~ l. !,
U \ Telecopier (561) 433-0874
I
-
IDJ r<: (i\ -
till " I"
r '( F I
hi l
l
-< / ...---
":J'I,-
/ ~r_l
/..1- J" / 7 ,
Ct..P0:/J JC / ((( IZCi...J "--LA. JrLf1t-
/Ji! / Ir''7 ~/~
1~.rL... --' L {'--
Hand Delivery [. 'ZLVC ncc.1.J
jJ.J-.
.
DEPARTMENT O~ DEVELOPME
~~
; .IIII~:!
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Division of Engineering
Blllell/ 1. Ka.t/arlak. NCi\RB
lJirecfor of /)(,I'elopment
llllildillg
Planning & Zoning
Engilleering
()ccllpa/iollall iames
COllllllllnih'Redel'eloplllell/
1\1all h II IlJlJX
RlLhard \\ (arl<;un .Jr I <;q
2177 ( raw ford ( ourt
l.anlan<1 II 114()2-2~ II
Rc Quantum Park Lot I Wal\er of Plalllllg Request
Dear IVlr Carl<;on
We arc III recelplof yuur lelter of January 24 I (JCJR requestlllg a wal'ver liom the plalllllg
requllemcnt for the re(crenced proJect It 1'\ Ullr opllllunlhat you qualify for <1 wal\er under Clt\
Cude Chapter ~ A111c1e 1\ <"ecllon I A I and 1 proVided yuu pnn,'Jde us with the follm'vlllg
a I ee of $200 00
b Cerlllied survey showlIlg property boundanes nght<;-of-way and easement<; (Ill
acumlance \.vllh Paragraph /))
In response tu your letter of I ebruary 1 1 ()()X lu I alllbn Ilcydcn Planlllllg and /olllng
Adlllllllstrator be ad\lsed that she has IIlforllled u'\ that the lotllllc location meel'\ her apprm-al
<.,hould you have anv questIOns please call
\ cry 1 ru I Y YUllrS,
j-, /1' - / / ~ II,
( i~, / ;1/~j/..._!../ 0.) 1~'!'~ 1.
.., - C I { /(1 '[, ( ~t L--
Bulent I I,astarlak
Dllcctor ur De\e1oplllent
BIK/ck
\.C .luhn Yeend
Talllhn Ilcydcn
1\'1lchaclllaag
( 'I, I)Ol-lIllh'lI!o..; C)II:H111l1l1I'alk I ,1 I \\;11\" 111'1a1l111~ dlh
America's Gateway to the GlI~f~tream
100 Ea~t nllmtllll nC>lch nll'd.. )'.0. 80x 310 Illl~'ntlln ncach. Florida 33425.0310 I'hllllc: (5(, 1) 37".('2RII FllX: (5(,1) 375.(,357
Article I.
Article II.
Article III.
Article IV
Article V
Article VI.
Article VII.
Article VIII.
Art. I
CHAPTER 5
PLATTING
In General
Waivers and Substitutions
Administration
Prerequisites to Platting
Plat Preparation and Approval
Previously Platted Subdivisions
Land Development Permit
Sale or Transfer of Property
ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL
The purpose of tlus chapter IS to provide a procedure for preparing plat documents
conSIstent WIth development regulations of the CIty of Boynton Beach and to create
documentatIon of phYSIcal charactenstics of land proposed for development within the CIty
No person, firm, partnershIp, corporation or any other asSOCiatIOn shall subdIvide a tract of
land anywhere in the mcorporated area of the CIty of Boynton Beach except In conformIty WIth
this chapter No subdiVISIon shall be platted or recorded nor shall any buildIng permit be issued
unless such subdIVISIon or development meets all the proVISIons of tlus chapter and those of any
applicable Laws of the State of Flonda, and has been approved 10 accordance with the
reqUirements as herein set forth, unless a waIver or substitution has been granted accordIng to
Article II of thIS chapter
ARTICLE II. WAIVERS AND SUBSTITUTIONS
Section 1 Waivers.
A. Eligibility A waIver of the platting reqUIrement may be conSIdered when the land IS
to be dIVIded 1Oto no more than two (2) contiguous lots and no more than three (3)
regularly shaped areas are to be dedIcated to the City of Boynton Beach (easements,
tracts, parks, nghts-of-way, etc ) and because'
Unusual condItions are created by o\\<nershlp or development of adjacent lands,
or
Adopted April 4 1995 Ordinance 095-02
(includes all ord thru 97-10 adopted 4/15/97)
5-1
-------~-- ~--------
Art. II, ~l
2. The land concerned IS Isolated or remote In ItS relationship to other platted or
Improved lands, or
3 The Improvements and dedIcatIons existIng on the land are substantially In
accordance With the reqUIrements of thIS chapter and if the waiving of the
reqUIrements for platting would not conflIct with the purpose and intent oftlus
chapter
B Waiver applIcation. Pursuant to Section I above, the developer shall submit an
applIcatIon for waiver of plat to the dIrector of development who shall reVIew the
applIcatIOn and determine If one of the foregOIng condItIons eXists and, upon
affirmatIve determInatIon, shall delete the reqUirement for platting.
C Appeal of waIver denial deciSIons. When the director of development detennines
that an applicant is not eligible for a waiver to plattIng, the deCIsion may be appealed
to the board of zoning appeals as outlined in Chapter 1, ArtIcle VII.
o Requirements in lieu of platting. If platting is deleted, a certified survey shall be
submitted to the director of development who may require deeded rights-of-way and
easements, reservations or Improvements requIred In connectIOn With plattIng under
thiS ordInance, includIng the postIng of surety to carry out the Intent and purpose of
tlus ordInance.
Section 2. Substitutions.
A. ElIgibilIty A boundary plat may be submitted when the subdlvlSlon or resubdlvlsIOn
of land is of such SimplIcity or IS surrounded by such development as to Justify the
WaIVIng of the reqUIrements for prepanng a full replat. For the sole purpose of
determInIng applIcatIOn fees, a boundary plat submittal shall be conSidered a pre-
apphcatlon submittal.
B Master plan waiver The submISSIon of a master plan for a boundary plat may be
waIved at the sole option of the director of development.
C Specific boundary plat requirements. All proVIsions of FS 177 and thIS Land
Development Regulation shall fully apply to every boundary plat IncludIng, but not
lImited to, those tangible improvements reqUIred in Chapter 6 not already in place
Adopted April 4 1995 Ordinance 095-02
(includes all ord thru 97-10 adopted 4/15/97)
5-2
i"HV-08-i9;37 14::5
"
t"
t~.
,
...~.
~(.
'So:':
Jh.:'
..~4
:_"
:f
~.
t:;7.
~.
,~
;:'~: .
~lif!
.'
:-.-'~
f!~'..
t~
!~f.
TCFP:
(reO/ure
coQ(t I
reglono
Plonninng
counc
5512214067 ~ 01 a:
--
Lou ~ /2/ q ')
-""---- - .-..--..-...._--....-----~
Plr' :G, ii)
ZG lr!G DEr:T.
Apn116.1997
Ms. Tambn Heyden, Director
Plannmg and ZonIng Department
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Subject: Quantum Park Development of Regional Impact
Revlew of Proposed Change
Dear Ms. Heyden.
In accordance with the reqUlrements of Section 380.06(19). Flonda Statutes, we have
revIewed the "NotIfication of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of
RegIonal Impact (DR!) (NOpe) for Quantum Park DR! dated March 17, 19Q7 submined to
Council by James G. Willard on March 17, 1997
The NOpe proposes to reVIse the master plan to sImplify the land use designations on lots
WIthin the DRl reducing the number of categones of approved uses, place multiple uses on
the unsold lots to provIde more flexibIlity for better marketmg, provIde for the potential
redevelopment of lots 22 through 31 and 6 through I] in conjunctIon with the abandonment
of Quatum Boulevard contiguous to these lots, and revise the development order as It relates
to traffic momtoring
The applicant believes the changes meets the cntena of Sectlon 380.06(l9)(e)2.. Florida
Statutes (F S ) Council does not agree and believes the change is presumed to be a
substantial deVlatJonpursuaru to-Scdion-380.06(19)(e)3., F S The appli'cant has provIded a
traffic analysis to rebut the presumption informatIOn to show that the changes will not create
any ~dltlOnal regIonal Impacts which would require substantjaJ deviation revIew
Council has reVIewed the traffic stud) provIded by the apphcant to rebut the presumptIon
and has the following comments/concerns
,~. s.w. martin dewn. b1vcS
IUlt. 205 P.O IloO" 1~9
palm dty, norMIG 3olI9'IO
phofte(5611221~
Ie Z69.406Q tax 156'11 22'1.A067
,.....,. l::.,.IC'-_""'!::' _'-t
TCRP'-:
5b1221~067 ~ 020:
,-
Ms. Tambri Heyden
April 16 1997
Page 2
1) The previous traffic study done for the Quantum Park DRI assumes a. total of 1,430,000
square feet of gross floor area (GFA) of office development. However the Master Plan
includes 1,687,772 GFA for office development. Traffic impacts due to toe additional office
development has not been addressed in the traffic study The Increase In office would create
unrevlewed traffic impact. Therefore, the master plan should be revised to Include 1,430 000
OF A of office development to be consistent With the traffic study
2) The project is currently allows the tradeoff of square footage of commercIal development
for hotel rooms (268 SF/room) The origlllaJ plan proposed two 2QO-room hotels for a
mUlmum of 400 rooms. The master plan should be revised to mclude a maximum of 400
hotel rooms
3) The proposed master plan indicates the project IS vested for 63 752 average daIly tnps. If
the tnp generation potentIal of the project is to contmue to be included in ~e master plan the
pm peak hour trip generation should also be mcluded.
4) There IS an eXIstIng development order condition whIch requires m06\tonng of trips for
every commercIal SJte approved along Park RIdge Road. The momtonng IS reqUIred to
IdentIfy Intersection improvements at Gateway Boulevard and Park Ridge Road. However
project traffic WhICh was antlclpated along Park RIdge Road may occur somewhere else 10
the project based on the proposed changes to the master plan GJven the proposed large
fiexlbility of land use allocatlOn witl'.in the project, a new condiuon should be mcluded 10 the
development order to perform annual momtormg at the mtersection of Gateway Boulevard
and Parle Ridge Road. ThIS condition should detemune what and when Improvements are
needed to mamtain the facIlity at the adopted level of servlce.
Please call If you have any questIons,
Sincerely.
L!J
J James T Snyder
Executive Director
MJB/jts
cc Peter D Spyke. TCRPC Actmg Chamnan
Greg Stuart, FDCA
~ames G Willard, Applicant
TOTHL F 02
T~ll
.~-~;1j, ,
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Engineering
Planning
and
Environmental
Consultants
May 2, 1997
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning and Zoning Department
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Dear Ms. Heyden
We have reviewed the letter from James Snyder of the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council dated April 16, 1997 regarding the Quantum Park NOPC. The
following responds to the four review comments provided in the subject letter
1) The land use maximums specified on the plan are not being
changed as a part of this NOPC. The current plan allows
1,685,772 square feet of office space. However, for clarity we
have provided the following background information Table 20
reflects the land use consistent with the ADA. It includes 4 43
million square feet of industrial, 426,888 square feet of
commercial, and 1 68 million square feet of office. It also includes
400 hotel rooms. The total trips were 67,154 During the review
process, it was determined that the hotel use should be treated as
commercial with a trade-off of square footage of 268 square feet of
commercial per hotel room
Therefore the hotel trips are now included in the total commercial
trips. This resulted in 63,752 total vested trips (see revised table
20)
The traffic analysis undertaken as a part of the study for
Amendment No 7 included land use totalling 65,300 daily trips
(see attached table) Thus the study actually evaluated a greater
impact than can now occur based on land use maximums The
attached table shows that the total square footage for the
combination of Industrial and R & 0 was 3 772 million square feet.
TEL 407 898 1511
FAX 407 894 4791
;'7
) I
1
Suite 200
The Carr Buildin~
3113la...1on Roa~
Orlando, Flonca
32803
r~7l
~..,. ,
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Ms. Tambri Heyden, May 2, 1997 Page 2
However, the final approval of amendment No 7 limited
industrial, including R&D, to 2,784,354 square feet. Thus
industrial use was decreased by 988,144 square feet. At the same
time the City limited industrial square footage, it set the limit on
office at 1,685,772 square feet.
The amendment No 7 study had actually used 1,416, 625 square
feet (the 1,430,000 square feet referenced in Mr Snyder's letter is
from another table referenced In the study) Thus the approved
office is 269,147 square feet more than that contained in the study
This is more than offset by the reduced industrial referenced above.
The effect of these changes represented an increase of 339 PM peak
hour office trips and a corresponding decrease of 655 PM peak
hour industrial trips Clearly, there is less impact with the current
plan
2) The approved trade-off mechanism to convert hotel to commercial
ensures that the project impacts cannot be exceeded In addition,
all development proposals for Quantum Park require site plan
review and approval by the City for individual land use
compatibility Since there is no danger of increased impacts and
the City has site plan approval control, there does
not seem to be a need to place a maximum on hotel development.
The proposed cap may impose an unnecessary NOPC to review
what would be no increase in impact.
3) The daily vesting was included at the request of the City due to the
fact that the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards
monitor traffic on a daily basis This gives them a value to monitor
A peak hour vested threshold is not needed If and when
necessary, allowable peak hour trips can always be calculated
based on the original ADA land use
4) The only possible effect of the proposed master plan changes on
the subject intersection come from increased commercial
development north of Gateway Boulevard As noted in the
Amendment 8 traffic study, this causes a decrease in the
commercial development allowable south of the
intersection The traffic study demonstrates that with this scenario,
the committed improvements still provide the necessary traffic
capacity The only possible effect may be that if commercial
development were to occur to a significant level north of Gateway
Boulevard prior to significant commercial development to the south
of Gateway Boulevard, the order of priority for Implementing
committed improvements at the intersection may possibly change.
Therefore a development order condition as follows would be
acceptable to the applicant:
'-",
TABLE 2D
(R ..1\
APPROVED TRIP GENERATION-DAILY
I ,
i
TOTAL
LAND USE ITE CODE UNITS i QUANTITY . TRIPS
I
I
INDUSTRIAL 130 1,000 sq ft. 4,443,120 * 23,460
i !
COMMERCIAL 820 1 ,000 sq ft. 426,888 ** 23,266
i !
!
OFFICE 750 1,000 sq ft. 1,685,772 * 17,026
i
i
HOTEL 310 rooms 400 * * *
I I
I
TOTAL I i 63,752
* Limit to rate at end of database:
industrial 5 28/1,000
office 10 10/1 000
** Multiple parcels. some may be aggregated, some may not, use 200,000 sq ft. rate
* * * Based on 200 units/hotel Hotel included in commercial rate.
H'\049029.01\123\Dtripgen WK4
'(1
I /
05/02/97
PROPOSED MASTER PLAN TRIPS-DAILY
i TOTAL
LAND USE ITE CODE ACRES SQ FT TRI PS
,
i
INDUSTRIAL ; 130 129 1 3,374,157 * ,17,816
,
COMMERCIAL 820 297 426,888 ** 23,266
OFFICE 750 127 1 1,416,625 * 14,308
RESEARCH & DEVEL 760 423 ! 398,341 3,178
HOTEL 310 52 400 * * * 3,402
INSTITUTIONAL 530 293 N/A ****' 2,352
i
CARMAX N/A 139 42,580 978
I
TOTAL i
, 65,300
*
Limit to rate at end of database.
industrial 5 28/1,000
office 10 10/1,000
* * Multiple parcels. some may be aggregated, some may not, use 200,000 sq ft. rate
***
Based on 200 units/hotel
** ** Trip generation based on students, 2,500 students planned for site
H'\04902901\123\DPMSTR-PL.WK4
/"l ~
<- " (-
05/02/97
TABLE 2D
APPROVED TRIP GENERA TION-DAIL Y
! I TOTAL
LAND USE ITE CODE i UNITS i QUANTITY i TRIPS
INDUSTRIAL 130 1,000 sq ft. 4,443,120 * 23,460
i
i i
I ;
COMMERCIAL 820 i 1,000 sq ft. 426,888 * * 23,266
OFFICE 750 1,000 sq ft. 1,685,772 * 17,026
i
! I
HOTEL 310 rooms 400 * * * 3,402
TOTAL 67,154
*
Limit to rate at end of database'
industrial 5 28/1,000
office 10 10/1,000
* * Multiple parcels. some may be aggregated, some may not, use 200,000 sq ft. rate
***
Based on 200 units/hotel Hotel included in commercial rate.
H:\049029 01\ 123\Dlripgen.WK4
-'"'II
,,-.I
'--'
05/02/97
DEPARTMENT OF
y /It! q7
COMMUNITY A-~EA IRS
STATE OF FLORIDA
~.,.....-..-
LAWTON CHILES
Governor
"Helping Floridians create safe, vibrant, sustainable communities"
JAMES F MURLEY
Secretary
Apn111, 1997
Ms Tambn J Heyden, DIrector
Planmng Department
CIty of Boynton Beach
100 E Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Flonda 33425-0310
Re Quantum Park Development of RegIOnal Impact
Dear Ms Heyden
The Department has revIewed the March 17, 1997, notIce of proposed change for the
Quantum Park development of regIOnal Impact (DRI) As proposed, the change IS to amend the
development order (DO) to vacate a portIon of Quantum Boulevard and reconfigure the adjacent
lots on the master plan. In addItIon, the apphcant has further proposed to clarIfy the permItted
land use categones wIthIn the development at the request of the Treasure Coast RegIOnal
Planmng CouncIl and the CIty of Boynton Beach.
The Department beheves that the proposed changes wIll not create any addItIonal
regIOnal Impacts SInce the traffic dIstributIon generated from the DRI would not Increase.
Therefore, we have concluded that the proposed changes do not constItute a substantIal deVIatIon
pursuant to the cntena specIfied In Subparagraph 380 06( 19)( e )2, Florida Statutes, and the
Department wIll not object to the proposed change.
flORIDA KEYS
Are:l of Critical Stale Concern
Field Office
279& Oveneas Higl1way, Suite 212
Marathon, Florida 33050-2227
GREEN SWAMP
Area 01 Critical Stale ConcErn
Field Office
155 Easl5ummerlin
Bartow, Flotida 33B3il-4f>41
SOUTH FLORIDA
RECOVERY OFFIO
P.O. Box 4022
8(j()() N.W 3&lh Street
Miami, Florida 33159-4022
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD' TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399 2100
Phone 904 488 8466/Suncom 278 8466 FAX 904 921 0781/Suncom 291 0781
Internet address http //www state fl us/comaff/dca html
-..........-..-...-
Ms Tambn J Heyden
Apnll1, 1997
Page Two
If you have any questiOns regardmg this matter, please contact Greg Stuart, Planner IV,
m the Bureau of Local Planmng at (904) 487-4545
Smcerely,
/ 1 \ \ ..., i\.. ~d ;C, I~t ".-"-
/! tv (
Charles Gauthter, AICP
Growth Management Admmistrator
CG/ggs
cc Mr James G Willard, Shutts & Bowen, LLP
Mr Mike Busha, Treasure Coast RegiOnal Planmng Councll
~/ ")
-.I -
- ----
e5/0911~9~ 14 55
':844833:89
CO~lMUNIT" AFF~IRS
~AGE 8:
___...__~..--~_.T
.~~,
FLORIDA a IS.
S"
~..
I.A"'TO:\ CIIILt~
COY[lll,.QR
.. ...,
,-
.'" S 2. ~__--
1\ J \ \~'51"-ql'/i 7
! n II . '1
DEPARTMENT OFTRANS' ,'RTATION
j
TIt""SI'(lRTATIO' I'LA:'\'\l\G urnel' Il1:-lTR'I'CT.a 1Il>1"i<<;;~~~-
, ,~~~I\\'G, :i.J
3400 \\4!C'It CUlllult!n'ial nh'd Jrd 1'1"llr H. l.olull"rduJe. n133J09-J421 Ie' ::.;g2--~~
TelephVIIl." ('15.1' 171..1601 fa'>: (95.&) 177-.&671 -
ApnllO, 1997
Mr D Ray Eubanks
Planning Manager
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee. FL 32399-2100
Dear Mr Eubanks.
'. I 4 1997
SUBJECf
Quantum Corporate Park Development of Regional Impact (DRl)
City of Boynton Beach. Palm Beach County
DCA File Number ADA-I084-048
Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC)
As requested in a letter from the Treasure Coast Regional Planmng Council dated March 24,
1997, the Department has reVIewed the subject NOpe.
The Quantum Corporate Park DR! was approved for commercial, office. industnal, research
and development, and high school use. The NOpe proposes the followmg.
. Project lots which had previously been proposed for a specific use, are being
proposed to have the flexibility to be developed as an industrial, office, or
commercial use.
. The maximum mtensity for any land use would not change from what has been
approved in the prevIous development order
. Hotel use could be substituted for commercial use. as long as the mtensl.ty for
commercial use is not exceeded
. Industria! use IS beir.g ~ubstjtl\ted for wh:lt wa~ formerly research a.Ild de....eJopmen
. Quantum Boulevard, which provIdes an access to a CIty Park, is proposed for
abandonment.
The traffic analysis is Incomplete and does not document the trip generation rates used in the
analysis. In order not to delay the process we performed an mdependent traffic analysis
usine lOp ~enerat1on rates we deemed appropriate. from the ITE Trip Generation Manual 5th
Edition. We have confirmed that the intersection of Gatewav Boulevard (N W 22nd
A venue) and Park Ridge Boulevard/High Ridge Road wIll oPerate at an acceptable level of
service at full buUd.out, With the reqUlred Stage 4 lmprovements shown in the previously
submitted traffic analysis for the Master Plan Amendment Number 6
As a reView agency, III the future the Department will no longer perform indCl'endent traffic
analyses If an analYSIS submItted for reVIew IS lncomplete and/or not fully documented, we
WIll reject It and the apphcant will have to perform the necessary work. In order to alleViate
the potential for such delays, we would suggest that applicants coordinate WIth all reVIew
I""\.
-Ie-/-
,J-
P5tn9!1=q~ 14 5~
C8448=:3:139
COMMUHIT'r AFFAIR~
F,.,GE 0:
Mr D Ray Eubanks
April 10. .1997
Page 2
agencies regarding their proposed methodology prior to commencing the study
In addition, the last paragraph on page 2 of the submitted traffic analysis states that
Condition No 4 of Ordinance No. 96-33 Section 2 is being modified to require monitoring
of trip thresholds for every site approval. on Park Ridge Road. This change is not reflected
in the draft of the proposed Amended Development Order, and should be added. With the
exception of thIS D 0 Condition, the Department does not object to the proposed changes.
Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions.
as/row
cc: Jim Snyder.TCRPC
Maria Palombo-MTP Group
Bob Romig
John Krane
File. 4240.20
Sincerely, 1
c:/;Jii1d.~
Gustav,.o Schmidt, P.E.
DiStri!t Planning Manager
..--
.....
d"O
-------.--------. --.----
Requested Cil}" Commission
\leetinl! Dates
o \lay 6 1997
Dale Final Fonn MusI be Turned
in 10 CilV \1anal!er S Office
~pril ~5 1997 (noon)
, (L- -t- -I tv. ;
_~.jf: i?i ~~/~,.. f1 o.~ 0/
"-' '71.~~ 1t."f1' ~..c ~a
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH tlv-'~..J~ c DO 'r
" oS f
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FO~+ ~ ~ ~
\ mlit..- iv'~~tl"~
v'.frJ(~:;:; ~~ ~
Dale Final Fonn M~ T~f:> ~
in 10 CilV \1anal!er 5 Office ,..A-,
June 20. 1997 (noon) ~f"""~
pt,;/r.,i.l~
July 3 1997 (Thursday noon) ~
Requested Cil]i Commission
\leetinl! Dales
o July 1 1997
~ ....lay ~O 1997
\tay 9 1997 (noon)
o July 15 1997
May 23, 1997 (noon) 0 ~ugusI 5 1997 ~rt-. July 25 1997 (noorll ~ If) ... 4fk
(~~:>V""" .~4l,t11~1I ~/1V~'fJ./7f
June 6. 1997 (noon) ~ ~ ~~9/o,I:~ i.:??;;~ ~
IdADfr""'" ~~jIu~ ~ bur-~ )
RECOMMENDATION Please place thlle~uest below on the May 20 1997 City Commission meeting under Public
Hearing. The Planning and Development Board. with a 6-1 vote, recommends approval of the Quantum Park DR!
amendment and master plan modification. subject to all staff comments in Exhibit "F" Conditions of Approval with the
exception of comments 7 8, 9 10. II 12. 13 17 and 19 and revisions to comments I and 16 relative to incomplete utility
system analysis and deleting commercial use on various lots.
~ '1.~ {J4 'I ~ c. tV'Iv>> -tb ~ .
Regarding com\nent 8 (lack ofmailhenance of the sand pine preserve and other landscape areas), staff agrees to delete this
comment and will refer this lack of compliance to Code Enforcement. Regarding comments 9-13 (traffic). staff has received
tho ,ttat:h.d rebu..1 from tho i;D~bOlding fast to ,Otntn.".. 9-13, tbmfore slaffrecOtntn.,,<b that they not be
deleted. Regarding comments 6 and mmercial use option on additional lots). staff strongly maintains that no
additional commercial lots be . garding comment 19 staff agrees to delete this comment and add it as a condition
of future site plan approval for industrial lots along Gateway
o June 3 1997
o June 17 1997
Lastly an ordinance is scheduled for fll'St reading at the May 20" City Commission meeting as well. which is necessary to
amend the Quantum Park DR! development order The recommended conditions of approval are inserted in the ordinance
and are recommended for approval. For further details penaining to this request, see attached Planning and Zoning
Department Memorandum No. 97-213
EXPLANATION
Project: Quantum Park PID
Agent: James G, Willard and Bowen LLP
Owner' Quantum Associates
Location West side of the intersection of Interstate 95 and Gateway Boulevard
DESCRIPTION. Request to amend the previously approved PID master plan in connection with an amendment to the DR!
as follows:
Change in traffic ... - fbl due to possible future severing of Quantum Boulevard between lots 22 and 3\ and lots 6
through I) and c..... III tile master plan designation of lots 6. 7 8. 9 10, 11 22. 23, 24, 25 26, 27, 28, 29 30. 31, 2, 3 15
16 and 40A from office to office/industrial use; of lots 1 66, 67 A and 67C from officelhotel use to office/industriall
commercial use; of lots 12, 13 and 14 from office/research and development to office use; lots 32,33 34A. 34B, 35 36, 37
and 38 from office/industrial to industrial use; of lots 17 18. 19, 21, 39, 52, 81, 82, 83, 84 and 85 from office to
office/industrial/ commercial use; of lot 40 from office/government and institutional to government and institutional use;
change in the master plan designation of lots 58, 59, 60, 61and 62 from industrial/research and development to
office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 86, 87, 88. 89A, 89B and 90B from research and
development to office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 65A, 65B, 67B and 91 from
officelhotel/commercial to office/industrial/commercial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 from
office/commercial to office/industrial/ commercial use; change in the master plan designation of lot 90A from research and
development to government and institutional use; change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 68B from research
and development to office/industrial/ commercial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 56,57,69, 70, 72, 73A.
S:\8ULLE'fIlI!'FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC ~
iJu4^"'~"".;I~ufi' .' ....~' ~~
';:JJ:iz.O +"-~ _~/O~~
9:- ~~#'j," -i-i::- ~ r~ ~ ~r cr><-
~~lf./ ~ZJ ~~.' ~~~J~
t'. ~.-J.Y ~ a--..eJ....... . oM; = e> . .A _1 .If. J /'1
~ tJ ,,'r~ ~~~ ~o-~-~
'~~~~~ ":;~-V::)~'fcfftZ-~~..~
SO~ ~-:~- ~ ~~~~-/tJ ~Wc(~~
/1;: I~ ~ ~. .zr~ ~)/~".-<:-e ~'i Q~; ~'1 y.~ -t- #~ *
d j~~ ~~~.1 11 t t?~fi'M- ~~VL ~11J ~.
( c!'!~. /tvr~ ~ A't1~d! ~ ~ ~-f. -; ....t:.4;:. ~ /J
- - 1 -14 . ~ ::--7) . A. /?::. tf. ~/~
l'l ~fL<- c~ . '-4... U c~,J wi -It~ ulr
~.J.l~. fij'f1<w-A
_Yo.,{N"'O~
4. ~'\
0' . ..\en
\ '1.4 'iii! rT7
7'~~.' '''-;, oiii 1.2:>
Y'/2~'"
CITY OF BOYNTON b~ACIf
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
73B. 7~ and 75 from industrial to officefindustriallcommercial use' change in the master plan designation of lots 46A. 48A.
-l8B. ~8C, 50A. 50B. 51 B and 51 D from industrial to office/industrial use, change in the master plan designation of lots 76,
77 78 and 79 from mdustriaVcommercial to commercial use: and change in the master plan designation of lot 80 from office
to commercial use.
PROGRAM IMPACT
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT
N/A
ALTERNATIVES:
N/A
...--.
--/~~d ~
Department Head'
.
""""'--
,~~?dd:-,-. 7'
Department Name
Page 2 of2
S:\BULLETlN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
~
rtpO(~ 10 ft-)) fh/()
e0p.f/J
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO 97-213
TO
ChaIrman and Members
Plannmg and Development Board
FROM.
f
Tambri J Heyden, AICP 1lJ.l--
Plannmg and Zomng DIrector
DATE
May 8, 1997
SUBJECT
Quantum Park - MPMD 97-001/DRlA 97-001
Master Plan Amendment No 8 (combme land uses, add optional uses to lots,
sever Quantum Boulevard)
NA TURE OF REQUEST
Quantum Park of Commerce, a partIally bmlt-out Development of RegIOnal Impact (DR!)
comprised of 539 9 acres, zoned PID (Planned lndustnal Development), IS located on the west
sIde ofI-95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton (C-16) Canal (see attached locatIOn
map - Exhibit "A") James G Willard, Esqmre and agent for Quantum Associates, property
owner of the Quantum Park of Commerce, has requested an amendment to theIr DRl
development order, Ordmance No 84-51 as amended by Ordmance No 86-11, 86-37, 88-3, 94-
10, 94-51, 96-33 and 96-65 The proposed amendments whIch reVIse the master plan (master SIte
development plan) are as follows.
1) Change in traffic distribution due to possible future severing of Quantum
80ulevard between lots 22 and 31 and lots 6 through 11
2) Change in the master plan designation of lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 22, 23, 24, 25,
26,27,28,29,30,31,2,3,15,16 and 40A from office to office/industrial use,
3) Change in the master plan designation of lots 1, 66, 67 A and 67C from
office/hotel use to office/industrial/commercial use,
4) Change in the master plan designation of lots 12, 13 and 14 from office/research
and development to office use,
5) Change in the master plan designation of lots 32, 33, 34A, 348, 35, 36, 37 and
38 from officelindustrial to industrial use,
6) Change in the master plan designation of lots 17, 18, 19, 21, 39, 52, 83, 84 and
85 from office to office/industrial/commercial use,
7) Change in the master plan designation of lot 40 from office/government and
institutional to government and institutional use,
8) Change in the master plan designation of lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62 from
industrial/research and development to office/industrial use,
9) Change in the master plan designation of lots 86, 87, 88, 89A, 898 and 908 from
research and development to office/industrial use,
10) Change in the master plan designation of lots 65A, 658, 678 and 91 from
office/hotel/commercial to office/industrial/commercial use,
11) Change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 from office/commercial
to office/industrial/commercial use,
12) Change in the master plan designation of lot 90A from research and
development to government and institutional use,
I
Page 2
Memorandum No 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
13) Change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 688 from research and
development to office/industrial/commercial use,
14) Change in the master plan designation of lots 56, 57, 69, 70, 72, 73A, 738, 74
and 75 from industrial to office/industrial/commercial use,
15) Change in the master plan designation of lots 46A, 48A, 488, 48C, 50A, 508,
51 Band 51 D from industrial to office/industrial use,
16) Change in the master plan designation of lots 76, 77, 78 and 79 from
industrial/commercial to commercial use,
17) Change in the master plan designation of lot 80 from industrial/commercial to
commercial use, and
18) Change m the master plan desIgnation of lots 81 and 82 from
mdustrIal/commercIal to office/industrIal/commercial use.
BACKGROUND
The amendment request IS governed by SectIOn 7 of AppendIx A, Zonmg, CIty of Boynton
Beach Code of Ordmances, whIch establIshes Planned Industrial Development DIstrIcts and by
Chapter 380 06 (19) (e) (2), Flonda Statutes, Developments of RegIOnal Impact - Substantial
DevIatIons. ThIs amendment IS submItted m connectIOn wIth a request from the appbcant that:
1) the CIty make a determmatIOn that the master plan amendment IS not substantial m
nature and
2) the proposed change to the Quantum Park DRI development order
a) IS not a substantial deVIatIOn and
b) does not reqUIre further Development of RegIOnal Impact reVIew
A publIc heanng must be conducted by the CIty CommIssIOn pnor to makmg a determmatIon as
to whether the proposed change IS substantIal m nature and whether further development of
regIOnal impact reVIew IS reqUIred. If no further reVIew IS reqUIred, the CIty CommIssIOn shall
issue an amended development order which, in thIS mstance, reqUIres the passage of an ordmance
whIch amends the ongmal development order If a determmatIOn IS made that the proposed
change requires further development of regIOnal Impact reVIew, the reVIew shall be conducted
only on those aspects of the development order reqUIred to be changed.
The reqUIred public heanng shall receIve a fifteen (15) day publIc notIce, followmg the passage
of thIrty (30) days, but not more than forty-five (45) days after receIpt of the amendment
matenals The CIty CommissIOn wIll conduct ItS heanng on May 20 1997, as advertised, and If
the CIty CommISSIon determmes the proposed changes to be non-substantIal, with no further
reVIew reqUIred, first reading of the amended Quantum Park development order (an ordmance)
will occur on May 20, 1997 as well
On December 17, 1996, the CIty CommISSIOn approved an amendment to the Quantum Park
master plan m connectIOn WIth the seventh amendment to the Quantum Park DRI development
order At thIS time, the CommIssIOn agreed to retam note 4 on the master plan m exchange for
Quantum Park preparmg a revIsed master plan havmg a "use trading matnx", pnor to any future
change to a lot deSIgnated commercIal on the Quantum Park master plan. Note 4 reads, "Lots
/?
d",
Page 3
Memorandum No 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-00l/DRIA 97-001
withm the project may be changed/relocated by approval of the CIty CommiSSIOn wIthout further
DRI reVIew or amendment." The subject request has been submitted to address the
CommIssIon's December 17, 1996 direction to the applicant which is necessary now to allow
approval of a restaurant (commercial) on the recently approved Hampton Inn parcel (lot 1)
/l.M,~}J},v-tfV< -\t'D -- ANALYSIS
(II - -.'1 v <'10
^ / ,1 ..~, v. _'.' J
(I ~\~,~' ,....v. "-,, \ I,
\'" \.oN II \ "~;~'
Exhibit B ntains the propose~aster SIte development plan. Added to each lot Impacted by
est are the current approved land use desIgnatIOns for ease of companson wIthin thIS
exhibit. The chart below summarIzes the number of lots impacted by thIS request.
FROM TO NUMBER OF LOTS LOT NUMBERS
Office Office Industrial 21 6,7,8,9,10,11,22,23,
24,25,26,27,28,29
30,3l ,2,3, 15 16,40A
Office/Hotel Office Industrial Commercial 4 1,66, 67A, 67C
Office/Research & Development Office 3 12, 13, 14
Office/Industrial Industrial 8 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35,
36,37 38
Office Office Industrial Commercial 9 17,18,19,21 39 52,
83 84, 85
Office/ Government & Institutional Government & Institutional I 40
Industrial/Research & Development Office Industrial 5 58,59,60 6l 62
Research & Development Office Industrial 6 86, 87, 88, 89A, 89B,
90B
Office/Hotel/Commercial Office Industrial Commercial 4 65A, 65B, 67B 91
Office/Commercial Office Industrial Commercial 2 63,64
Research & Development Government & Institutional I 90A
Research & Development Office Industrial Commercial 2 68A, 68B
Industrial Office Industrial Commercial 9 56,57,69, 70, 72,
73A, 73B, 74, 75
Industrial Office Industrial 8 46A, 48A, 48B, 48C,
50A, 50B, 51 B, 5ID
Industrial/Commercial Commercial 4 76, 77 78, 79
IndustriaVCommercial Commercial I 80
Industrial/Commercial Office/Industrial/Commercial 2 81,82
As shown m the chart above, the optIOn of mdustrialIs bemg added to a net of 34 lots, the optIOn
of commercial IS bemg added to a net of 24 lots, and the option of office IS bemg added to a net
of21 lots. ExhIbIt C graphIcally illustrates the lot locatIOns of the optIOnal land uses ofpnmary
".
,/
~
Page 4
Memorandum No 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
interest. In general terms, mdustnalIs bemg added to the northwest comer of the PID (adjacent
to the Dos Lagos PUD), at the northeast comer of Gateway Boulevard and High RIdge Road and
on the south side of Gateway Boulevard, between Quantum Lakes Drive and Park RIdge
Boulevard. Commercial is being added to the lots along the eastern segment of Park Ridge
Boulevard (including four lots the back up to 1-95). Both commercial and industrial are being
added along Gateway Boulevard. The effect of thIS, if approved, would be to allow commercIal
uses along the entire stretch of Gateway Boulevard (excludIng three BGI lots) and abutting 1-95
With any redIstribution or redesIgnatIon of land use WIthin the master plan, the follOWIng local
issues are evaluated.
1 Does the redIstributIOn/redesIgnatIon of land use result In a change in concept for
the Quantum Park of Commerce or the abIhty of the Park to develop In a qualIty
manner?
2. What Impact wIll the land use redIstnbutIOn/redesIgnatIOn have on projected
expendItures whIch WIll be spent WIthIn the regIon?
3 Does the Impact of the land use redIstnbutIOn/redesIgnatIOn result In a conflIct
WIth the number, type and payroll level of Jobs projected In Quantum Park's
ApplIcatIOn for Development Approval (ADA)?
4 What Impact wIll the land use redIstnbutIOn/redesIgnatIOn have on adjacent
property?
5 Will there be an Increase In traffic resultmg from the land use
redIstributIOn/redesIgnatIOn?
RegardIng Issue one above, last summer, the applIcant submItted a master plan amendment/DRI
amendment to allow, among other thIngs, the optIOn of commerCial on all 1-95 abuttIng lots,
most of the west SIde of the eastern segment of Park RIdge Boulevard, as well as along the
Gateway Boulevard corndor east of Quantum Lakes Dnve. As a condItIon of approval, the
applicant was reqUIred by the CommISSIon to not only limIt the total acres of commercial, but
deSIgnate the exact locatIOn of those 47 acres. ThIS was m response to the followmg concerns
WhICh CIty staff belIeve apply to the subject request as well
a. The "optIOn" of commercIal on such a large number of lots defeats the purpose of
master planmng and wIll lead to spotty locatmg of commercIal uses WIth no
conSIderatIOn of adjacent uses.
b Commercial uses, WhICh draw customers, pedestnans and vehIcles, haphazardly
mIxed with Industnal uses, whIch reqUIre greater tractor traIler traffic, IS
potentIally unsafe and IS not recommended by transportatIOn planners.
C. AddIng the optIon of commerCial use on lots along Gateway Boulevard and High
R.1dge Road and along the raIlroad tracks and 1-95 wIll Impact the type of
commercial ventures Interested In locatIng In Quantum Park. ThIS ShIft WIll attract
commercial uses such as service statIOns, fast food restaurants, oil change garages,
and stnp commerCial that WIll be Interested In the 1-95 VIsibIlIty and captunng
external project traffic, WIth httle relatIOn to the planned industrIal park.
d. In the VICInIty of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road, west of
Congress Avenue alone, there IS already 500,000 square feet of commerCial square
if
Page 5
Memorandum No 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
footage approved, unbUIlt and vested smce 1990 These approvals, as well as the
VisIOns 20/20 commercial revItalizatIOn efforts planned for Federal Highway, will
be competmg Wlth the pnme vIsibIlIty, high traffic commerCial lots proposed m
Quantum Park, due to the type of commerCial uses that will now be mterested m
locating m Quantum Park. Since the demand for commerCial land use is finite,
some eXIsting commerCial uses WIthin the city may mIgrate to Quantum Park.
e. Stnp commerCial and the types of commercIal uses that will be mterested m locating
close to the 1-95 mterchange wIll lead to re-subdIvIsion of the majority of the
proposed commerCial parcels along Gateway Boulevard mto smaller parcels and the
creation of outbUIldmgs, whIch wIll mcrease the appearance of more commercial
use in the PID ThIS is because, although the land area would not increase, more
commerCial buildmgs would result smce the types of commerCial referenced reqUire
smaller parcels than IS currently platted along Gateway Boulevard. Also, there
would be the potential for stackmg of bUildings and sIgnage; all competmg for
visibilIty and access to remam VIable; factors less Important for office and
manufactunng uses.
f. As stated m the zomng code, liThe purpose of the PID dIStnct IS to provide a zoning
clasSIficatIOn for lIght mdustnal development that Wlll better satlsfy current
demands for hght mdustnal zoned lands by encouragmg development whIch will
reflect changes m the technology of land development and relate the development of
land to the speCIfic SIte and to conserve natural amemtIes." The mcreased optIOn of
commerCial space causes a ShIft m the Image of the PID, espeCIally as VIewed from
the 1-95 interchange; one of the major gateways to the CIty ThIS ShIft has no
connectIon to any change m mdustnal technology and the demand for mdustnal
land. Rather than creatmg umque opportunIties for development not provided
elsewhere m the CIty, the ShIft competes WIth other areas of the CIty
g. It has been argued by the apphcant that the CIty can control undeSIrable commerCial
uses through the use approval process. The use approval process IS the method
deVIsed for a PID to estabhsh uses permItted for a speCIfic PID dIstnct, rather than
estabhsh m the zomng code a ngId hst of permItted uses. ThIS method was deVIsed
for flexibIhty and to keep up Wlth technology as new uses are created m the
marketplace However, to allow blanket approval of commercial, WIthout
consIdenng 10catIOnalImpacts, defeats the purpose of master plannmg and weakens
the CIty'S abIhty to deny a speCIfic commercIal use at the time of use approval if a
parcel has already been deSIgnated for commerCial use.
h. The proposed commerCial optIOn of all the lots south of Gateway Boulevard that
back up to the rmlroad tracks and 1-95 WIll encourage further conflIcts WIth the PID
penpheral greenbelt reqUired to be mstalled along the railroad tracks and the
approved Quantum Park SIgn program. ThIS IS due to the deSIre of these uses, more
so than other uses, to have unobstructed vIsibihty of buildmgs, sIgnage and extenor
storage and dIsplay areas from 1-95, examples of whIch can be seen Wlthm other
CIties along 1-95 This was the reason that the maJonty of the commercial lots are
located internally to the park on the approved master plan.
1. Over the past two years, there has been mcreasing mterest m locatmg manufactunng
uses wIthm Quantum Park. In recognition of the city's need to attract research and
development and hght mdustnal uses to dIverSIfy ItS economIC base, the CIty
aggressIvely pursued BGI to locate m Quantum Park. The city also Identified
economIC development as one of ItS vIsIOmng goals. Towards that end an economIC
/"
-)
---
Page 6
Memorandum No 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
aggressIvely pursued BGI to locate in Quantum Park. The city also IdentIfied
economIC development as one of its vIsIOnmg goals. Towards that end an economic
development director was hued last September and an economIC mcentive program
for Quantum Park was adopted applicable to developments bnnging m a certaIn
number of jobs. The jobs however, also needed to pay a certain mimmum salary
Also, as one of the CIty'S recently adopted "qUIck victory" vIsionmg projects, a
formal marketmg program will be developed WIthIn 90 days to further promote
Quantum Park as an mdustrial park.
As a pomt of Interest, Boca Raton IS currently processmg a DRI for the vacant IBM
bUIldIng and 500 acres In the vIcImty for a 5 millIon square foot lIght Industrial
park! ThIS actIon sIgnals further competitIOn, and also mdIcates a strong market at
thIs tIme for lIght mdustnal uses.
Regarding Issue two above, It IS antICIpated that the proposed master plan changes WIll have no
effect on the projected expendItures WhICh wIll be spent wIthm the regIOn. RegardIng Issue three
above, It IS belIeved that the proposed master plan changes WIll have an effect on the number, type
and payroll level of jobs prOjected m Quantum Park's ongmal applIcatIOn for Development
Approval (ADA) ThIS IS because allOWIng the optIOn of commerCIal on lots WIth hIgh VIsibIlIty,
and lugh pass-by traffic WIll encourage development of these lots as commerCIal over Industnal.
The pay range for servIce sector jobs is smaller and mdustnal acreage provIdes a greater number of
jobs than commerCIal acreage. Jobs salarIes are, m turn, lInked to home pnces. Attractmg lugher
priced residential developments was also a ViSIOns 20/20 ObjectIve.
Regarding Issue 4 (impact on adjacent property), there IS a concern WIth locating industnal uses
adjacent to the Dos Lagos PUD ThIS IS based on the expenence the CIty has had with complamts
from the reSIdents south of Quantum Park regardmg truck, radIO and vOIce nOIse and early hours of
operatIOn of the mdustnal uses along the south border of the Park and as far away as the PublIx
DIstributIOn Center The buffenng proposed WIll only proVIde VIsual, and not audItory, mItIgatIOn
due to the Inherent mcompatibIlIty of these uses.
Regardmg Issue 5 (traffic), the CIty does not have a traffic engmeer or traffic planner on board and
does not budget for outSIde reVIew of submItted traffic studIes, therefore the CIty must rely on the
regIOnal plannmg councIl's (RPC) reVIew of Quantum Park's traffic study ExhibIt "D" contams
the RPC's comments on the study It also contams FDOT's traffic comments (on state roads only)
and the project traffic engmeer's response to the RPC's comments. The RPC, nor Palm Beach
County, had suffiCIent tIme to reVIew the traffic engmeer's response pnor to the wntmg of this
report. Therefore, traffic concerns WIll have to be resolved prior to ComnlIssIOn approval of thIS
request. As a pomt of mformatIOn, staff has also asked the RPC to make a recommendatIOn
regardmg the timing of the WIdemng of Gateway Boulevard. The development order mdIcates that
tlus was to be done by the end of 1994 Smce buIld out of the project has occurred more slowly
than expected, thIS tImeframe needs to be adjusted accordmgly
In addItion to the redesIgnatIOn of lots for greater flexibility, Quantum Park Boulevard IS proposed
to be severed. ThIS would allow consolIdatIon of lots m thIS area for development by one Industrial
user Although thIS will require a future abandonment applIcatIOn to be processed, It was mcluded
at thIS tIme because It is a regIOnal Issue and potentIally Impacts the DRI's road system due to
redIstributIOn of tnps. Staff concerns from Engineenng, Recreation and Parks, UtIlIties and Fire
Departments regardmg thIS sevenng are mcluded in ExhibIt "F" - CondItIOns of Approval.
G
Page 7
Memorandum No 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-001lDRIA 97-001
RECOMMENDATION
To address the conflicts staff has raIsed with this request's impact on the CIty'S objective of
actively promoting Quantum Park as an industnal park, staff recommends the land use desIgnatIon
changes Illustrated on ExhibIt "E" These changes mclude the following'
1 deletion of mdustrial on lots 3, 22-31 and 6-11,
2. addItIon of mdustnal on lots 12-14,
3 deletion of commercIal on lots 17-19,21,39,52,56,57, 72, 70, 69, 73A, 73B, 74, 75, 81,
82, 83-85, 68A and 68B,
4 deletIOn of commercial, but retammg hotel use on lots 66, 67 A and 67C,
5 addItIon of office to lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38
Pursuant to Flonda Statutes, Chapter 38006(19) SubstantIal DevIatIOns, the submItted
amendment IS consIdered to be an (e)(3) type change (a change not specIfically classIfied
elsewhere under state law) Under (e)(3) changes, the applicant must provide "clear and
convincmg eVIdence" supportmg that hIS requested changes do not constItute a substantIal
devIatIOn. The only aspect of thIS request that mIght possibly constitute a substantIal deVIatIon is
the redIstributIon of traffic caused by the large flexibilIty of land use allocatIon m the project.
Therefore, staff recommends approval of thIS request, subject to staff comments m ExhIbIt "F" -
CondItions of Approval, whIch must be addressed pnor to adoptIOn of the ordmance amendmg
the development order Staff further recommends that the commISSIon determme that thIS
applIcatIon does not constitute a substantial master plan change pursuant to local codes and does
not constitute a substantial deVIation under state law
TJH.dIm
Attachments
xc Applicant
Central FIle
S '\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\QU ANTUM\MPMD\statTreport.doc
7
L0(;ATION MA~
QUANTUM CORPORATE PARk
~rt'\ r '~r:" ~ :'l' :' . / '-- 'iJ VI\L,--r\
-tIf'lI~ ~ - ." '. , r-- r-, fJ-~
l1C: ~"'S,..1 _,,' " ~ \:
. ^ "'. " " ... .
''"'n''Jr, "'(."V 'i :..". -';' !o"_,",-"
''''~no"" uuJ-i1\"....".".. \0. '~~" '\\. ;, ,; __ . :1 't I, -,r- ,-=:- N ~ :: ~,:
1-_ ~L~~~ '~~\\ " , ~, ~. . ."/ FJ ~I:J I:J.
......" '; i t- J k,. "'s fI,:, . '''', J I ,
' . J ~ P ...:: ....- ,,; /' I! ,'/'.. Sl'"4l'"1j
" ~ s"' '/;~~~,:W; ~/ 'A ~ _ \111
tl/JLj ~~ ~ 1IMf' /./ I "~? 441 - ~ ,cr.,., ,,~,,: _i
- - v Nr- '. '. ,. _
' "' ,~ .Y," :: , i J f,.
g", 1./ '", I~ililiit---.J j' " J.. ~..,",,: !
'l'!i ii., ,... . J .. ~ "oj" I j
l:t ~L jo J J · , , r"1 I ',~;;~;~J.~4r f(f~'&"2J~j{~!ii,ifgt~fi4N'" " r--. LI
@ l!J) (. ~J& f : ;l:;(~1.);;;~~~ ':W;;::i:t.J%~~i~;Wi% "',0,." T' I ~ I /
r:~iJ !''''~W/;~~~~!111~~t~'I~tli!~;i C'l'"y : ~ ,~j~~?
-=- of. ~ I I 'f~~~;'''>''''"' '''''' 'ii,;~:'I'I' ~ _:~: ":
~ '!!:!J J r f/j'""""i"' ~ _ . , J '-L, .J J
I
(.... ~ ,D.... ... '.. ""'Y'''' '. ,,~... ". . ",~i ~~"""'''''' ............. b.... .",.. .."...., .. ..,,, .."."...,..... ........"....."."",.. . .,.." 'f< ".' I,
1 ; 'M ,i';',,' l'\I:;;f;;';!;'r;:;jw.(;tWi~;j:\:'~i;~~;~i;)i;!~.N~A\r.i;'\)s:!-!I!\rii';~~;t]!J! ~l!;t;.~t:';.,yi' ~ ----WI I, .
:::." '>~""'~"i"U'k..,~_. '/~<li:l;{";"""", .............'''...'fiWJ.' J{/X
~ ; ~ ~iif;~('.~\i,~;d;'i~:;;:!~~i:~l;(~j..iti;)';:~f4~;,ti!~'~::;fJ':~~i~fnI1r -" ;);!~?~ // f:) lJ !
----..:........... ~ .. ~ ~:'::;;"~1"~~(,'f~"~~~~\#f.!;f;:j;:\!1;(t;j~;t;~i~i;);~'~\j;!ii .. 'I %1 !
t~. - < "" -'.. --..,~........"..... ". ...",........."...... . I
I '<_.. _'''''''' ""'" '.. ...... . "
i !~~ JI,',',','; / r~{Jj JllIi/' F, ~"~..~:'~~ rp j"Xl ~.I
~ p-t-- ",' ",,', 1=0 r:::: If. , {' 1
': .- .t-~ ,..,. ,~-. I ;<. ~
MILES::, ~ >-- , ~~.-,.. t-r_ !- ~ .. ", ' ; . n''',,1
'- ~ . .~~ f:c:>-- ~~ ! ^" ii" I
.. .. .. ~t- " t' j".
t .. ~ /::::2 r-..~.. - ~ /f;/IFll. ' I ,'F:
- '--t- . ~.. ~ ...
- - , , ....,"" h, r 1 "" '-" ::J .. :' . I """.
r- ........... t'-1t1 .... ~ ~r~
-" -.. """ " "" ".q" lim r-=t.... 1"1. 'i:1' ~
---
--
::3
1/8
I I
800 F'E~T
PR~OSED AMENDMEN-
EXHIBIT "C"
:-~
ro":T."
1\
\~
\1- II l
1;!lJ 'I
Ii =-::,===-=,='~.: ~=~"
II,
I
"
,I.
II: ~ I
;11
:11')
II,
WI
'~':~~"':':?'."',
.".,...
1;1
t
~-
I
.~~
:.. .-
:;--- -I
=:
...eo-
-,
-- -----.
.~~_;t~~g ~:~;:-
r '1 ..."""-
,I_
r--:1~
-..--
'!.
"
,
.,
,) ,T
I 7l
"
'.J\,'
LOTS ADDING COMMERCIAt---
LOTS ADDING BOTH
COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAi -1'
,
,
,
-' ',------
Q~~I
1 :
I l
I
I I
. I~j) ~. jt Jt''' _~ _; I
'. .. .' 1-i I "
-~-2:C~~~J/~=-
i ",Ii.
i ,,,
--
LOTS ADDING INDUSTRIAL
,
,
l(
1\
...",
MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 8
MARCH 8,1997
nesP'O'mONCII"lWIlIMl!:IIUO 'PII WlICMIDA' 114:
...tf/lftC.ttr.If~~...at.QIIIt.(:If.nto
CItI ....11lCJll1",1 "0 . DolI(D '/",It
, DCIolLOl'WIII" rJI 1l<< rCllJ~ lMD .,. tlASSJntAloa.t 1"'OlUl "'" tltttO "
'DI.J.Ol'I'tC .n:~, _14If f'UIOftt(P Coltf ~
==-(:C~ .~D' l~' ~r...-':~=,~ <<A
~:':fii:l T:."~-=- ~ ,.., COfMIltOIf. .....
.. P'(JM71(D .. "" ..-en ...... (~.... on......'...
1 1'CM'" .,tIt. ,.., .(It .. MO.U'I tMJlU. ..... aU') ....
=~~~ ::uJ:J...:':r~J:' ~~~~. == ~= =I~ ~
1III'~IU'SOI(f"'D
I :='~~J~,I~~,=ro:.':;.r lIlCA'ff
MASTER
SITE
DEVELOPlVIENT
PLAN
LEGEND
. ~. ~
~......- -;
I. rtn J
T
KEY PLAN
CommIU" O....apmen'
COhIll lCo",m...IaI) 13." A....
INO 1"'''IIlI,IaI) 'O.Sf -.'eo
C " 'ICo...........loIjIn.t1lullonol) 50.8' A.'fI
011 (Olne.) 1'-414 Act"
III IOIll"/lnd~.\o-loI) 'O~ 25 A.,"
Ole (orr'ce/ln....trlal/tom"'*clal) 108'3 Ac,,.
Weiland, 1_00 Iocr,.
Sand P.... R...... .~ 00 Aern
Road. 41.'" Ac,..
QUANTUM AS50CIA TES
Nolloool Clly Cenler
115 Wesl Woshlnglon 51
Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317) 636-1600
oPEN sPACE ==r-
Por..
I ft...
10," Acr..
Note Lots with handwritten land use designations noted on them are lots
impacted by this amendment. The handwritten land use is the current approved
land use The typed land use designation, on those lots with no handwritten land
use designation, is the current approved land use
/6
PRC-'OSED AMENDMEN.
EXHIBIT "B"
",":"1"';
1\
\~~<
,1- ',I'
"I.
II' ~ -' 'I
Ii :::.:=,=.:-:=---==',., ~
III
,I
11_
I
III
II, ~,
;l[
......-.
J4~--
:/j'!
, I,
W'
....fI...
1_-
~~~
I --
~~.~~",:..,.:~.~';..
t ..t'
...
'-....
I"
Iii!'
'I'll
!I'"
,. I
'I
iIIll
~f';/ Ii
!: I'
i di!i'
I ;1
I
:. ~-
=----.
::-
OFf-/Hor!";lPfI
.It
-
--,
=..Zi_r:i!= ii:-.#
--_. .-- - ....
--.-.~..- .. ~-..
'1 "1.,"",
.,.
"
I
./
"7\';1
"
I~l
I ...
. 0 All I
'i \\ ~~~.~~~~- ~
0.......'
-------
...
o.A'
--------
..
0......
..
0..-"
--
-'
-,-
..
D.}'I..'
,
,
,
,
,
,
, ..
" a ~'
...
0.......
------------
l\
1\
-------- U
...".
",ASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 8
"'ARCH 8,1997
M$ Prl'ItO< tit ..... ....r.r ... to" lIIlIt.ArIO "t hC
.... or N( .. ~ DPIOJrtCJI' . .fI(;(r-elWoC' ..."
0'" Awlwowt.., M(l . ~1(O .{"'"
J Ill.UOl'.:tf" ('JI ft4( rCltJo-e-'1 VND uv: ttASSl"CAJood S"OlA.O 00(' 'ICU'O "'"
,ou.==.t=~~ ~rNIf,:.;,.~r..., 'lac- ~
u*>CJ"QIIIl ,.....1oUtWI M>ft.l . nUll "..,. lit " Qlan lIA'*l .-u.
IC)f 10 lJIlQO.7 'VI"" ""CS
~'=:":"~';"~~""CONJQIIC. fWD1IlJ
-r Pf-nlo aN .. ...-en __ CIIMiIIlt(1IIt D(~"'''IQJ''
I tot.... esm. ~ '1:. M Nl).ft1 ..... ...... u.rtl ...
:.~r~~ :.w:j'.r, ~:'~J~ ":-t~~~. =:: ~= ='~~
llI'...~"'ItI'SU(l"".
, ~::f:'..:r:,.:r~~~,:..=.'.::=:,:,'::..r..c.AItf
lVIASTER
SITE
DEVELOPlVIENT
PLAN
LEGEND
. ~.
- - - .....;
--
T
I" rut J
CEY PLAN
=.-
Commlned D....opm....
CllMU (c...............,
IN!) (lndull"oO)
C .. I (c............'oO"""",",,,,,,..)
OfT (Ollie.)
01 (Olli<lflnd~.\<I")
Orc (Orlle.,4ndu.lrlGl/Comm_clal)
fltUond,
Sond Pine A........
"G~ul.
t3 53 ,"c,,,
'0" ~c'n
!lO.89 "ern
I' .... "ern
10:> 2'!t Ac,,,
toe'3 ~t' II
1500,"er..
.., CO "ertl
41.1] Ac'..
QUANTUM hSSOCIA TES
Notional Clly C.wlllr
115 Wesl Washington 51
Indianapolis, IN 4620"
(317) 636-1600
()PEN SPAC[ ==:l
Porkl
I.......
10.1' Ac,..
Note Lots with handwritten land use designations noted on them are lots
Impacted by this amendment. The handwritten land use is the current approved
land use. The typed land use designation, on those lots with no handwritten land
use designation, is the current approved land use.
II