The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-121 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION April 7, 1995 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT. Project Name Boynton Beach Station (Tri-Rail Parking) Applicant Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority Agent Joe Handley, Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc Location East of High Ridge Road just north of Gateway Boulevard File No NWSP 95-001 Land Use Plan Designation Commercial - Industrial Zoning Designation Planned Industrial Development (PID) Type of Use parking facility for the adj acent Tri-Rail station Number of Units' NjA Square Footage Site area 436,691 square feet (10 025 acres) Building Not applicable Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning District North - Industrial development, zoned M-1, Industrial District South - Private road and farther south vacant undeveloped land, zoned PID, Planned Industrial Development East Tri-Rail station and farther east 1- 95, both zoned R-1, Single Family Residential West Vacant undeveloped land, zoned PID, planned Industrial Development Existing Site Characteristics The existing site is undeveloped woodland, located in Quantum Corporate Park Proposed Development The proposed development consists of 640 parking spaces including 13 spaces on the existing Tri-Rail station This support facility for the Tri-Rail station will have new landscaping as well as preservation of existing vegetation Renovations to the existing Tri-Rail station site are also shown on the plans Both properties are under single ownership, however, the properties will not be unified Concurrency Quantum Park is vested for concurrency, specifically traffic and drainage levels of service I page 2 Site Plan Review Staff Report Boynton Beach Tri-Rail station (Parking) Memorandum No 95-121 Driveways Four (4) driveways serve the site from the adjacent private road A parking variance has been requested to allow four (4) driveways instead of a maximum of two (2) allowed by the code Renovation of the adjacent private road is also part of the proposed development and shown on the plans parking Facility When staff comments are incorporated the parking facility will meet code A total of 640 spaces are proposed employee parking spaces on the present Tri-Rail station site Landscaping When staff comments are incorporated the landscaping will meet code A landscape appeal has been requested to omit the vehicle use area screening along the east property line of the site Building and Site Regulations Buildings are not part of the site plan for the parking facility A variance to the zoning code has been submitted to omit the 40 foot wide, peripheral greenbelt required along the east property line of PID The variance will be heard by the Board of Adjustment at their regular meeting of April 17, 1995 community Design Plan N/A Signage The proposed signage is shown on sheet LS4 (See Planning and Zoning Department memorandum no 95-127) REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS. Below is a list of those departments that have comments regarding this request DEPARTMENT ATTACHED MEMORANDUM Public Works utilities Fire Police Engineering Division Building Division Parks & Recreation Forester/Environmentalist planning and Zoning N/A 95-103 N/A N/A 95-080 95-074 & 95-033 N/A 95-124 95-127 The above memos (Departments' comments) may be addressed on the permit set of drawings The remaining departments did not have comments regarding their review of the amended plans RECOMMENDATION. The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the permit plans for the project being amended to show compliance with staff comments and the applicable city of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinance MEH dim xc Central File a SttRpt Tri/P&D ;z l f l. ~ I LANOO::CAPr OA fA ~.,.,~ ..,~ :"':.i '..;c;c~(;"". f'''. JIIlfO~ "''''II<(1II 'MeISe.,.,. ... 1'(JrAl~H"'~ I' tJlfrnoo SF .'J '17'~ ...-rr..""""", _IS "~D J.V' ~n ""'1"~"A'CTJSY"~"".tJVoI'('."..1"f. ""'-J 10 t/If IICtDC.~~ .... /WI f -rfrlltfD ~ CIInJIf TOIl Dt#"~pnr --.rT! ~ -____L:' ----______ .0--" , - (_-:T- ~n~..~WP.~ ...-... . : : . , t o . . . V : \ I } 1\ ::-.:;':L' J::\~- U ld_ ~ ,.J .. -. . , ~~ -' -' -' ntOI L:'::"" \ i _...~~ .can "-at II. '~~ ;...;.~:~ ... I' - .-. ..~" I': :=~.~-=':::"_", _=......n. ! ..._~:- ~=-.~,'-" \ \ \ ~~;-'~..- \ -~f'. . --..J ~.nn..' \\ \. i . 1. \ ~,~ i, \' ,,~w..' \ ~ \ n l,------- ~:E:.t-~::;~-:: H fl ~ 0. ~ '0 <;'l ~ A:l o "> '- , c) 4 ,_. I~' iLl . -... ~. . IDA" ........ ~..~, 1 ......--..-... i- I ' 1--::-: F ===- " '='==~ I, II :~;::; I i---~.-- - ! i LV<USCN' OV<N ! 1-:: -:::::',- 1'::--- ~- -: .-.~ 1_, t. MEMORANDUM UtihtIes # 95- 103 TO Tambn J Heyden, Planrung & Zonm c' John A. GUIdry, \\ '\ DIrector ofUtihlIes ~ March 21, 1995 FROM. Date SUBJECT Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station New Site Plan - Second Review Staffhas reVIewed the above referenced project and offer the followmg comments 1 A ReservatIOn Fee of $ 194.04 IS due WltInn TInrty (30) days of COmmISSIOn approval or upon request for my SIgnature on HRS/DEP forms, (Sec 26-34 [E]) 2 Only Palm Trees and shrubs are perrmtted 10 Utihty Easements, (Sec 75-18 1 ) 3 CIty water will not be supphed for ImgatIOn, (City Comp Plan, Pohcy 3C 34 ) It IS our recommendatIOn that the plan proceed through the reVIew process. If you have any questIons regardmg tIns subject, please contact SkIp Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404 sm xc Clyde "SkIp" Milor Peter Mazzella File G-=- '?, ~ ()' . l--~-;----.~ ';-D~ Pl.", '< 11., .i'i ZONiNG DEPT. {; ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-080 DATE. MARCH 21,1995 IO... T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM. KEN HALL, ENG AIDE PHONE 407-375-628~ SUBJECT. TRI-RAIL STATION SITE PLAN - 2ND REVIEW The followmg commcnts are submItted for your reVIew' 1 On the sIte lIghtmg plan, speCIfy that poles shall wIthstand wmd loadIng up to 110 m.p.h and that the system shall be photo electnc actIvated. Art.5,Sec 5-144(g) and specIfIcatIons 2. At the two pedestnan crossmgs, mstall M.U T C.D WlIA-2 pedestnan crossmg sIgns m both dIrectIons M U T C D SectIOn 38-15 3 SpeCIfy that the fifty (50) foot "access parcel" shall be owned and maIntamed by the Quantum Commumty DevcIopment Distnct. Does not meet defimtIOn of a publIc street nor does It meet the desIgn cntena. App C, Art. X, Sec 10 4 The SIte plan IS subject to satIsfactory pavmg, dramage, and sIte lIghtIng plans meetIng CIty codes at tIme of penmttIng. Comments 1 thru 3 may be satisfied at tIme of penmttmg. EngIneenng recommends that the plan be forwarded to the P&D Board and the C R.A.B Board for revIew and approval KRHlkrh C WillIam Hukill, Dev DIr and to file. tnral1.2rv ~ v/ BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 95-074 March 22, 1995 To Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director From Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Re Site Plan Review - 2nd Review Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station Please refer to Building Division Memorandum No 94-033 (copy attached) with previous comments 1 Signs A Entrance sign may not be off the property site Please check location and property ownership B Directional sign requirements are a maximum of four sq ft and five ft in height and only four are allowed, so subject directional signs do not appear to be in compliance c Free-standing signs - Location is shown for one but not both Please explain and state which one will be installed 2 Plans show the location of poles and height, however, no details showing adequate penetration to comply with wind load requirement Have engineer state on plans the design load, etc 3 Need photometric and proof that the sign program has been approved These issues need to be addressed prior to permitting fDV ~Jt4 Al Newbold AN mh Atts Copy of Memorandum 94-033, Amended plans MAR 2 3 cc William V Hukill, P E Department of Devel A TRI RAIL TRC PLANNi,~G h:.J ZONING DE-PI. 7 RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM *95-124 TO Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Kevin J Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~~ ~ Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station - 2nd Review FROM RE: DATE March 22, 1995 The applicant must provide the tree management plan document to show how the individual areas of existing trees/understory plants will be protected during construction and maintained by the owner The existing gopher tortoises must be addressed by a State Department of Fish and Game permit KH ad rn MAR 2. 2. 10q~ ill ~@~n\'IJ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. CJ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 95-127 TO Tambri J Heyden Planning and Zoning Director I' ! _ Michael E Ha~ *~ Site and Zoning ~evelopment Administrator n April 6, 1995 / FROM DATE SUBJECT Site Plan Project Location File No Review - 2nd Review - New Site Plan Boynton Beach Station - Tri-Rail Parking East of High Ridge Road and north of Gateway Boulevard Joe Handley Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc NWSP 95-001 Agent The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-referenced proj ect It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comments either from the first review or new comments as a result of the second review To show compliance with these comments will not substantially alter the configuration of the site and design of the building The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the site plan request is approved The applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the building Department for permits for the proposed project I SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. 1 Show on the landscape plans the required vehicle use area screening along the east property line of the project [Landscape Code, Section 7 5-35(e)] The landscaping is required, unless the City commission approves the Landscape Appeal in progress LAAP 95-002 Modify the drawings to comply with the results of the appeal 2 Show on the plans the 40 foot wide peripheral greenbelt required along the east property line of the PID (Appendix A, Section 4L) The peripheral greenbelt is required, unless the Board of Adjustment approves the variance request in progress (BOAV 95-005) Modify the drawings to comply with the results of the variance 3 It is anticipated that the landscape material in the micro-siting, reforestation and natural areas specified on the plans will be able to be substituted for required vehicle use area landscape screening The applicant has agreed to place the following note on the landscape plan in lieu of requesting relief from the landscape code Following field inspections and a determination by the City landscape inspector that the micro-siting, reforestation and natural areas do not form the required vehicle use area screening, additional trees and/or shrubs shall be added to the plans and installed on site to form the required screening The additional material shall be a native specie and comply with code specifications regarding size and spacing /0 Page 2 Memorandum No 95-127 2nd Review, New Site Plan Boynton Beach Station - Tri-Rail Parking File No NWSP 95-001 4 The maximum number of driveways allowed per site is two (2) [Article X, Section 5-142 (h) (7) ], therefore, omit two (2) driveways leading to the private road adjacent to the site Only two driveways are allowed, unless the Planning and Development Board and city Commission approves the parking lot variance in progress, PKLV 95- 001 Modify the drawings to comply with the results of variance 5 Indicate on the drawings with a distinguishable symbol the location of the curbing that is required to protect landscape areas that abut vehicles use areas Wheel stops may be used to protect the landscaping at the front of the parking stall The sides of a parking stall that abut a landscape area shall have curbing and compliance of City's standards 6 The permit submittal for the proj ect shall include, separate permits and plans for the construction of the private road, parking facility property, redevelopment of the existing Tri-Rail station property, and any other off-site improvements proposed 7 A modification to the Quantum sign program is required for the on-site sign The sign program modification will require separate submittal and approval by the Planning and Development Board and City Commission 8 The City's height limitation is forty-five (45) feet The height of all structures such as site lighting poles above forty-five (45) feet shall be reduced to comply with the height limitation 9 The minimum height for trees and palms is eight (8) feet Amend the landscape plans to specify the sabal palms are no less than eight (8) feet tall after planting 10 Considering the public access to the Tri-Rail facility is via a private dead-end street without a cul-de-sac turn around, submit for review cross access easement agreement that creates a public access to egress the dead-end street The document shall be signed by the property owner of the private road and the property owner of the land where the access is being provided The agreement shall describe an easement and specifications regarding design and construction equivalent to the City'S requirements for a cul-de-sac The agreement shall be in perpetuity and eliminate liability and maintenance obligations regarding the public's use of the easement The document shall be recorded in the records of Palm Beach county following review by city staff and the legal department A copy of the recorded agreement is required to be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department prior to the completion of the new and renovated facility 11 Place a note on the drawings indicating that site plan review is required for all improvements identified as "Future" on the plans II RECOMMENDATIONS 12 Recommend using melaleuca mulch instead of pine needle and cypress mulch specified on the plan II Page 3 Memorandum No 95-127 2nd Review, New Site Plan Boynton Beach Station - Tri-Rail Parking File No NWSP 95-001 NOTE If recommendations are approved, they shall incorporated into the working drawings required permits for the project MEH dim xc Central File . 2ndcom ?ri/P~D M be for LOCATION MAP BOYNTON BEACH TRI-RAIL STATION ., .\ . ' . .. , , " . , . , . \ . I , ~/ , / '5-...::tr ~ ~ ~,,_ . l:f!:IfWi} H~1J6 ;;;1- i>-- it::: ->- jiI ~ _ I ~,,'L~... ;:11.1.. "~ ~ ~~ ':-c:: ~<~ : ~ II:' ;~!llJ I ~~ bAR R.~I ~_r T r ~ I:::- - - r=- I- m 1 ~STAT - ~~ r I ~-' y ~ ~t '-~ ~ fT It ~ W'; r-J I'~:: iJ. HI [3"; '~, tlIlI II If-: \>\ ~ >- Wi \ffi] :r~ ,"'"....." ~ E'j- '- " ; ~-0 _ f -= [ tit' TE: III' I, \~ '2:1 t ' C.I It:>> E! II IJ II I u.. ...... '1!iT "'I~ --= :1 I- r I' I , J rr 'r.: i J -, II r r.....~ I II I I ~..... - ~- ~ I ~"iO:.,F~%C r fl I I r::-t f ~ I- I- 1 :3~6r-t~ 6:~: 1 ~ ~ ,='5,~ PU, ! M1 811 IT JM 11 "' '~_ . ~I~, ~f-rTr)- I tJrf.- ifJ..-w.y,~ ,I r v.= _:.. I ~ :U,Jd :=:: 1-.., r;m: l' ~, I - \ -lC"-', :~f-- - 1- 1- I 1( I \. - II 11t-,TT I ~ ---' I '- '-f-.- W II ..'" ~... - f" - ...",,, I ",...J - ~: ~~ ,::;~ I \~:>--.J..r-,I /\.\dJ f"" '., .,:::.+:; ~ lj~ 7J \ ^^ ~ 1'(.~ I,..L . 't= _ ~ y~1-' ~ I H' - - j \. ',...........,.<ll ...... t'!.ci- '-, l"-"i\ \ ~ ~I ~, - I I J- r+~ r H'Jr ,_ ~ I ~;5 'I Ii - T "1# t!,1 li~;-U \: ~. I ;:~ --,=.J~ '/1!/i7 ~l =:j ,~~ ~~: -='~ a'- ~~""" , ;~i~~ -i '. ,-J \l1 P ffl"l,rJ ,---- i -,- ..LI, ~ - ) I 4~~ ~ el/l ~ h\~t;: t: ;::;::::: ~ '---.... ;:0 ~ , ~1/ -: '~,,, fI' 1:'1. (. " +-' Ii '. ~,\;~ ' ~/' ....J ~ --'U,H--J~ 0 li"I, '~~ '. e ::.:=: ~L,:, .:.=: . j(~f ' / t) , I ~ ~ rJ ,TL, ~-t- '-:0 ~ I- _ fir . 1 ..."~ f---- I ..LL f--, I-~ I F . 'f - 1- '-.imI- '--. .... " 'IT +- ~ - flTT I I ' , ~-I- V , I I _ -, "; k ~-:~ ! ~ ~\\!f I , '..,'~-1 ~ =--, ~~~~ I ~,;;.,}~- r- - l / R e ~~J\ ~r~.~. ~ . ~ , ;----1 1, 'i \\'~ h'"t + 11 ~ IT:1 , .R~ -'~H L h I 00._ ~ = (T r "\'xL': ~ H~1- 8. ' 'NT 1-...... -.:..- , -~ 7 r'~ w= I Milt:;: II r1r "i ,-\,\j..L,W Ir-.-r- OF COM ME RLII;;; ! ~ Ii ~I 1 1 ::r = r-+- ~. .J / \ 1f+ .1, '1~. n- ANTUM PARK] I. r-' I.-~,>,_ n '<=. ~ rnrT Alh' "~ J :r,~. ~>~ rUW~ I rl I 111; "': ", -~ 'C"~ ~'~'~l~~,U' 'tl(.' I, u:r ... H ~ _ '.. '-r-,. I' l rJ ' ~ f "-+t - ARI< "'o~ll. aLV. \ ~ ~ ,II PU Rt: J ~ ~tc~, I~',)I i.r-,~,';-"- {L' . r_, ITII,III'III" T ' -- ,-~~ " t - - ' . ,_,':, lIt) --, - !) r-- - , :~) ~ c.:::J- ,; I \ , .. I ~ '.- hI) ~ t\,~ ~ ~ ~~ I l' NDT IN CITY ,.-- \ ) I '-I I r.....I.':. "";;;"';:...II! w.lIo. ~..:l~ F= , _ -1,---, . - - --;~,.--~ - ,__I = f:-~ =- -r- - f:-~ =c 1--_ - -- - -= -~ 1--1-= f- -- >-::--- =- - ,...1- _ 't-t - - -- ~"- :0,........ l..". '- i1'Il"' /;- -j_ '- l- I IT III I ::::::1 =r= f- r=-~ III III E::::lr-i r- t::: t::::+=- I L-.. - - i f _l f I , - I . - , , rfill [IlJ ...........c:_~ " ,_~- 'r r~ I - I 'i' I' .1 I I I I >-. \1; II ~r:TIIIlIlltr E l1#i I PU ~ , ~ rr ,I , J ru\ Ij" I , r 11 miiiiiiJ1 c ;;~ ... il ~IitH I' I' 0 1/8 MILESV ~;I ~~J IIIIIII Ig__ I ~lz:I: 1!IIIIIllIf'0 400 8~",~;,~T D"'''''' ~__~5 r ....... ..,..,.."'.....~.."'... ~,. , ~_~ IIIJIY /'\ '( ~1..J. .. ~ 1:::' ~ ,- .. - - ~ - . PRUJ b<':'l' '1'1'1' LE LJEtiCRI P'l'luN 'l'YPE / DA'l'E REC I D lKACKiNG LUG - ~iTb PLAN R~V~~W ~UtlMilrAL Ii, \ RR 1'- S-rA--rlOO 10~ ~~~\l.Ju-- FI'T-~L,'t--1 N&W SITE PLAN MAJOR SITE //.::J.7 /9s AMOUNT / ,5'00 C/O 1/1 ~LE NU Oc.c:>sP 9$:'-001 PLAN MODIFICA'l'IUN RECEIPT NU ~ ~ / * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * /' TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED CuLURED ELEVATIUNS REC'D (Plans shall be pre-assembled The planning & zoning Dept will number each sheet of their set The planning Dept set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match ) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ACCEPTED //;;. '7 ) 9s I . IDENTIFYING ---a.ENIED APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL DATE DATE SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES DATE OF LET'rER TO APPLICANT 2nd SUBMIT'l'AL DENIED ACCEPTED DATE DATE DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER REVIEWER'S NAME * * * * * * . * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Label TRC Departments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW DATE SENT util P W parks Fire police PLANS l)o 19(') 1'}N l In ~ () / 5s ;:;../ 1 j9.r <1 C-Od-.Y MEMO NUMBER RETURN DATE 1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED He,MO # / DATE / "C" 7 S;:oso / IS- / &/ 45'-/7 / a. '1&/ U - / qs-"JdL/ ~'OldO/ PLANS MEMO # / DATE / "c" c;,s-- / / co Planhinn f . Building ;>/:7 Pf{ '.J 3.3 / 0. J~ 1-- /_ Engineer /tIo 95-03$ /,J. II" 9S' / t'~$ Enginee~ L-. -1_ Forester In ;t-'-{~.=- / .?-J 1(;,/'-,- /__ q~> 01t.p DATE uF MEETING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS (;)/~)T c.;>~, & checklist sent out w/ comments) TYPE OF VARIANCE(~) DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING (Aesthetic Review App , dates of board mtgs NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: 3/13/9~ (Must be assembled Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORED ELEVATIONS REC I D: MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW J DA'l'E SENT: g /1'-1 (~S- MEMO # 9_~~!) 9 () RETURN DATE: JJ;J.//r~- PLANS MEMO # / DATE /"R/D" / ' / h ;C-Y/'il -J}.t/ I C-- ~ '1:"--010/ / J2 'IE S ~ ~/~2.. ~ C; I ' LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGN~ PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGN~ INSTALLED SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS PAD 71/;( jrj- CC/CRA 'II/g) fj~ \ .\\ \ \ \ \ ~ Util P W Parks Fire Police PLANS ~S 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL MEMO # / DATE /"R/D" _ '1$;10: / .2/~1 / R.. Planning 9~-3 ' /~. / t2-- Building -~ - / .3 , / (L Engineer 1$/;138 / /1 / Y<-. Engineer 1'---/)1'}-'~/ '3ill / r<- Forester . DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT A TRACKING ~p ), \ ~~\ \ f' 'I 1''- I 1\1\ 1\ I"~ v i1 0 :< \., / .9~ \ ~S 1;>QfJ ~\ \..'? \. CHECKLIST ,)v \~'- The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that the submittal of amended plans and documents is substantially complete for review Turning in this list and the appropriate plans and documents will enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the Planning and Zoning Department project Name Boynton Beach Tri-Rail station 1 submit an amended site Plan Review/€ondi~ional-Use application form that reflects the changes that were made as a result of amending the plans and documents to comply with the Code of Ordinances and the Technical Review Committee comments A copy of the original form with a distinguishable symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a 90mpleted new form with the changes identified If there are no changes v/required to be documented on the application form, a letter from the applicant stating same must be turned in with the amended submittal ~ /Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents, including surveys that show compliance with the code of Ordinances and comments made by the Technical Review Committee Two (2) of the sets shall have the appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the designer responsible for the drawing(s) Plans and documents shall be assembled in twelve (12) individual complete packages with the title of the project on all pages and/or sheets and each page or sheet numerically numbered such as the following example 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3 Q ~f(,,{V ~~Cf/~~ O&f' ~; ~ ~ submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored duplicate copy of all V ~ drawings of the elevation views of each side of all bUildings and \ signage associated with the project The colored elevation views shall ~ match the elevations shown in the documents that were submitted for site plan review The applicable exterior surfaces as identified above shall be colored with the color name and associated color reference number identified The type of exterior surface material shall be identified next to the associated color The colored elevation drawings shall have compass direction or title of the side of the building identified The title block of the original drawing shall be shown The maximum size is 24" by 36" Do no submit on board of any kind Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are to remain in their existing condition and photos of existing buildings that are located on the sites that abut the perimeter of the subject property The minimum size is 5" by 7" Each photograph shall be labeled to identify the location of the existing structures with respect to the location of the proposed project. @ submit color samples as an example of the proposed colors Each sample shall have attached a label that identifies the color by name and numerical/letter code from an established color chart /submit a 8 1/2" x 11" transparency of the landscape site plan drawing to be used on an overhead projector at board meetings 6 CHECKLIST The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that the submittal of amended plans and documents is substantially complete for review Turning in this list and the appropriate plans and documents will enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the planning and Zoning Department project Name. Boynton Beach Tri-Rail statio~~ J ~ ---- Ve/ 1 Submit an amended site PI n Rev1ew/eondLt1onal-Use appl1cat1on form that r a were made as a result of amending the plans and documents to comply with the Code of Ordinances and the Technical Review Committee comments A copy of the original form with a di.tinquldhabl. symbol identifying the ohange(s) may be ~ubmit~eO or a completed new form with the changes identified If there are no changes required to be documented on the application form, a letter from the applicant stating same must be turned in with the amended submittal s~~~e~ (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents, i~ing surveys that show compliance with the Code of Ordinances and comments made by the Technical Review Committee Two (2) of the sets shall have the appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the designer responsible for the drawing(s) Plans and documents shall be assembled in twelve (12) individual complete packages with the title of the project on all pages and/or sheets and each page or sheet numerically numbered such as the fol}owing example 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3 '___ fh8-t-D~00-Pt\2> c;;F' ~ ie olor photographs of the buildings on the site that are to remain in t eir existing condition and photos of existing buildings that are located on the sites that abut the perimeter of the subject property The minimum size is 5" by 7" Each photograph shall be labeled to identify the location of the existing structures with respect to the location of the propoted prfj ect . ~' - (;) {Q IJ P.l'-(9.t1~~Lv1 Af/4- 1<.)(:- (P}-r-I"ctv 'P~I v~~ ored ~levation Vi~dra~in~s - a ~olored duplicate copy of all g, \ dra ings of the elevation views of each side of all buildings and XL- ~ s' nage associated with the project The colored elevation views shall tch the elevations shown in the documents that were submitted for site Ian review The applicable exterior surfaces as identified above shall be colored with the color name and associated color reference number identified The type of exterior surface material shall be identified next to the associated color The colored elevation drawings shall have compass direction or title of the side of the building identified The title block of the original drawing shall be shown The maximum size is 24" by 36" Do no submit on board of any kind ~ '- 3 4 submit color samples as an example of the proposed colors Each sample shall have attached a label that identifies the color by name and numerical/letter code from an established color chart 6 submit a 8 1/2" x 11" transparency of the landscape site plan drawing to b7 ~~n an overbead projector at board meetings (3) APPLICATIONS WHICH REQUIRE SUBMITTAL OF A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ;UANT TO THE MUNICIPAL IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC 'ORMANCE STANDARDS ORDINANCE REQUIRE ADDITIONAL REVIEW TIME NOTE REFER ;TIONS REGARDING TRAFFIC TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT (4) THE ABOVE DATES MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE iREVIHF pb -I ./'- PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 95-151 FROM Carrie Parker city Manager Tambri J Heyden f\fcf) Planning and zoning/Director TO DATE April 13, 1995 SUBJECT Copies of Development Plans of Current projects Scheduled for Review by the City commission at the April 18, 1995 City Commission Meeting Please find attached five (5) sets of plans for the following current development projects _/ New Site Plan - Boynton Beach Tri-Rail station (File No NWSP 95-001) ~ Major Site Plan Modification - Palm Beach Recreation I 95-003) Leisureville (File No MSPM Note Please return the plans/documents to the planning and Zoning Department following the meeting If I can be of further assistance, please contact me TJH dim Attachments a eranamtl 413/P&D PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 95-156 Agenda Memorandum for April IB, 1995 city Commission Meeting FROM Carrie Parker City Manager Tambri J Heyden Jfj U Planning and Zoning Director TO DATE April 12, 1995 SUBJECT Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station - (NWSP 95-001) New Site Plan - new parking facility Please place the above-referenced request on the April 1B, 1995 City Commission agenda under Development Plans, Consent agenda DESCRIPTION This is a request for site plan approval to construct a 629 space parking facility and expanded platform, for the Tri- County Commuter Rail station, located on the east of High Ridge Road and 460 feet north of Gateway Boulevard, within Quantum Park, submitted by Joe Handley, Craven Thompson & Associates, agent for Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority RECOMMENDATION The planning and Development Board, with a 7-0 vote, recommended approval of this request, subject to all staff comments (utilities Department Memorandum No 95-103, Engineering Division Memorandum No 95-0BO, Building Division Memorandum No 95-074 and No 95-033, Recreation and Parks, Memorandum No 95-124 and Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No 95-127) TJH dim Attachment . CCAllnNWSP Tri RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 195-124 TO' Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM Kevin J Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~d9 j}L- Boynton Beach Tri-Rail station - 2nd Review RE: DATE March 22, 1995 The applicant must provide the tree management plan document to show how the individual areas of existing trees/understory plants will be protected during construction and maintained by the owner The existing gopher tortoises must be addressed by a State Department of Fish and Game permit. KH ad rn rn@~nw~oo , u \, MAR 22 I PLf1.NNING AND ZONING DEPT. (1 MEMORANDUM TO 1/4. YI/I ,B ~ I :r )f /C t ~ t vt/) fC- ANN J JV 6 of ~l)I--i,IV WI L b'^'~t? ) f/1~fc..s SLLFT- "2. (J IV I ..v (, fJ ( Ift,- foA DATE 3/ ;2{)}rS' Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans r FROM RE Project &y i1rrov,) !3,&/fc-/J ItRi-lf,fi L .sT~1ro-J After reviewing the referenced project Department recommends the Planning and consideration amende~ plans for the 1\ above the ~f{WHJ~ + fAIf~ utE ,oT that the project be forwarded to Development Board for their This department will not be requ~red to sign-off the permit documents associated with the subject project ImrJ~ lli ~ W lli I~i ! lJU 1 PLJlJmlNG AND ZONING DEPT. C AMENDl ALD BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 95-074 March 22, 1995 To Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director From Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Re Site Plan Review - 2nd Review Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station Please refer to Building Division Memorandum No 94-033 (copy attached) with previous comments 1 Signs A Entrance sign may not be off the property site Please check location and property ownership B Directional sign requirements are a maximum of four sq ft and five ft in height and only four are allowed, so subject directional signs do not appear to be in compliance c Free-standing signs - Location is shown for one but not both Please explain and state which one will be installed 2 Plans show the location of poles and height, however, no details showing adequate penetration to comply with wind load requirement Have engineer state on plans the design load, etc 3 Need photometric and proof that the sign program has been approved These issues need to be addressed prior to permitting AN rnh ~ J:r4 fa V Al Newbold Atts Copy of Memorandum 94-033, Amended plans cc William V Hukill, P E Department of Devel w ~~rnI A TRI RAIL TRC PitmN~j%tpf f, MEMORANDUM TO f -Z tJ f\J I -1J (, 1;4W1 ~~I J f!lZt ~tvt/ J fC-Af'},N, J1Jb <~t>H,IV W, (., byV~,<? ) fA~f<s S4.pT- b (~t( faA. DATE 3/ :)~)rS' Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - Amended Plans r FROM RE Project By i1J1t>.,,) {3,cItC:f-J !{'(,-{fAt L .s.r-4ti'o..J After reviewing the referenced project Department recommends the Planning and consideration amende~ plans for the l\ above the ~f{(-rHltyJ T' fiq~~ utE ,or that the project be forwarded to Development Board for their This department will not be required to sign-off the permit documents associated with the subject project ffDlJ-@~,~~~l I 'I \ 1 I ~ i ~ ~ ~ ; I 'I! n i \ .' "P: iO 'r r! 2 rl i: -: {"' i.~I'l PLf..Nl~li,!C ',;"D ZONiNG DEPT. C AMENDl ALD ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-080 DATE. MARCH 21,1995 TIl.;. T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM. KEN HALL, ENG AIDE PHONE. 407-375-628~ SUBJECT. TRI-RAIL STATION SITE PLAN - 2ND REVIEW The followmg comments are submItted for your reVIew' 1 On the sIte hghtmg plan, specIfy that poles shall WIthstand wmd loadmg up to 110 m.p.h. and that the system shall be photo electnc activated. Art. 5,Sec 5-144(g) and specIficatIOns. 2. At the two pedestnan crossmgs, mstall M.D T C.D WIIA-2 pedestnan crossmg signs m both dIrectIOns M.D T C.D SectIon 3B-15 3 SpecIfy that the fifty (50) foot "access parcel" shall be owned and mamtamed by the Quantum CommunIty Development DIstnct. Does not meet defimtIon of a pubhc street nor does It meet the deSIgn cntena. App C, Art. X, Sec 10 4 The SIte plan IS subject to satisfactory pavmg, dramage, and site lIghtIng plans meetmg City codes at tIme of penmttmg. Comments I thru 3 may be satisfied at tune of penmttmg. Engmeenng recommends that the plan be forwarded to the P&D Board and the C.R.A.B Board for reVIew and approval. KRH/krh C Wilham HukIll, Dev Dlr and to file. tnrml.2rv BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Office of Professwnal Standards To From. Date Re: Tambn Heyden! D~ Lt.JamesCummin 17 March 1995 Tn - RaIl StatIOn I Parking lot variance & second review TRC Memo # 95-0125 I have revIewed the plans regardlOg both of these proposed plans and find them to be acceptable 00 rn @ rn 0 Wi ~ rnli ~ I i j ~ ~ Iii '. I': i " MAR I 719C)S p~ ...., PLANNING AND to-- I ZONING DEPT. -vi TO THRU FROM SUBJ DATE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-33 Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director ~ Larry Quinn, Sanitation Superintendent Site Plan Review - Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station (2nd Review) March 16, 1995 The Public Works Department has no problem With' above site /- Larry Quinn Sanitation Superintendent LQ/cr ----- FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO 95-238 WDC TO Planning Department FROM Fire Department DATE March 16, 1995 RE NWSP 95-001 2nd site Plan Review Boynton Beach Tri-Rail station North of Gateway Blvd, East of High Ridge Rd The Fire Prevention requirements have been met for this project 4/i~;/a~cW~ William D Cavanaugh, FPO --, rm. .. . R l? R 11\ ~a ~ h~' tIn tE; ~') tE; l1 ;;;....,....:::-.! i U --~-- \!nJ MAR 1 7'~- L _.~.- ,- -' ' ~~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-098 FROM Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Clyde "Skip" Milor, utility Dept Chief Field Insp Lt Jim Cummings, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist william HUYill, Director Department of Development Tambri J Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director~~ March 14, 1995 TO DATE: Applicant File No Review - 2nd Review Boynton Beach Tri-Rail One (1) block north Boulevard on the east Ridge Road Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority NWSP 95-001 station of Gateway side of High SUBJECT- Site plan Project Loca"':ion Attached is the amended site plan submittal for the above referenced development for your final review and recommendction We would ask that you review this amended site plan documents to determine if the planE have been adjusted to satisfy comments made previously by your department If the comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing If your comments have not been met or must be met by correcting the site plan again, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing Finally we would ask that you recommend to us if the plan should be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory Board for review or held for further revisions by the applic3nt All correspondence shall be received by the Planning and Zoning Department per the following Please return your memo and the amended plans to the Planning and Zoning Department by 5 00 P M on Tuesday, March 21, 1995 If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to Michael E Haag at Extension 6260, who is coordinating the review of this development cc (Memo Only) Carrie Parker Don Jaeger Floyd Jordan Charlie Frederick Tom Dettman John Guidry ~ TC::RA2SP Re.... ,.(5.~. FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO 95-226 WDC TO Planning Department FROM Fire Department DATE February 24, 1995 RE Site Plan Review Boynton Tri Rail station High Ridge Rd An additional fire hydrant is needed at the parking lot entrance This will facilitate fire flow tests and provide an additional point to help protect the bus ramp and parking to the south William D 1// J' / ~Va(A CU] / \ naugh, FPO /ttJ/~- ~~ th~ + i' ~~~ cd-v 7 ~-- f~i . ~ @ ~ nu '0'. ,.'1 ,u I'll L 'UPu FEB 2 4 iM'15 : ; J ) \ fL,. i f) PW{NiNG AND ZON!NG DEPT. /"TO FROM DATE: SUBJECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-061 Tambri J Heyden Planning and Zoning Director Michael E Haa:.vg~~ Site and Zoning D veldPment Administrator February 21, 1995 site Plan Project Location Agent File No Review - 1st Review Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station East of High Ridge Road just north Boulevard Mr Joe Thompson & Associates, Inc NWSP 95-001 of Gateway The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the site Plan Review of the plans for the above-referenced project It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories, the first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process The second set of comment(s) are recommendations that the planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development The applicant shall understand that all documents plans submitted for site plan and/or permit review are subj ect to additional comments I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement ~ I SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. -I 1/ / IJ' 0 - &{Hh, 't.J --- Re ..A I f the access road is part of the proj ect and is d Gl_ private road, then landscape screening is required on the south side of the road (Section 7 5-35(e)) Please clarify ownership of all separate pieces of property Landscape screening along east bou code (See 1) Please apply for relief of this requirement or landscape material Planned Industrial District (PID) section of code (Section 7 H 17) requires a peri heral greenbelt along east property edge lease apply for varl om Board of Adjustment for re le men (Appendix A, Section 7 H 17) or the ropritte size peripheral greenbelt. ct ~~~ 4 ~~VIt is anticipated that micro-siting, reforestation and ~' natural areas will be able to be substituted for required ~ landscape screening (See 1) , however, additional 'I/) information is required to verify this Please show 'I plant material locations on typical detail drawings to verify that the existing and reforestation landscaping will form the required continuous hedge 3J 0'<.... ,(!) ----r- ND f0 {) v..) 6 II ~ 7 MEH dim II trira111 rav Please show that landscape cur[bing at i?ll vehicle c c). ~\ 0 v 't- ") "\ OLIVA; Ownership of €eet with S 1 Recommend using melaleuca mulch instead of pine needle mulch N D C~.> ~iA.,)J PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-061 FROM Tambri J Heyden planning and Zoning Director Michael E Haag:1;t~ Site and Zoning D velo~ment Administrator February 21, 1995 TO DATE: SUBJECT site Plan Project Location Review - 1st Review Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station East of High Ridge Road just north Boulevard Mr Joe Thompson & Associates, Inc NWSP 95-001 of Gateway Agent File No The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the site plan Review of the plans for the above-referenced project It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories, the first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process The second set of comment(s) are recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development The applicant shall understand that all documents plans submitted for site plan and/or permit review are subj ect to additional comments I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement I SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. 1 If the access road is part of the project and is a private road, then landscape screening is required on the south side of the road (Section 7 5-35 (e) ) Please clarify ownership of all separate pieces of property 2 Landscape screening along east boundary is required per code (See 1) Please apply for landscape appeal for relief of this requirement or install the required landscape material 3 Planned Industrial District (PID) section of code (Section 7 H 17) requires a peripheral greenbelt along east property edge Please apply for variance from Board of Adjustment for relief from this requirement (Appendix A, Section 7 H 17) or provide the appropriate size peripheral greenbelt. 4 It is anticipated that micro-siting, reforestation and natural areas will be able to be substituted for required landscape screening (see 1), however, additional information is required to verify this Please show plant material locations on typical detail drawings to verify that the existing and reforestation landscaping will form the required continuous hedge 5 Please show that landscape areas are protected with curbing at all vehicle accessways (See 5-142(e)) 6 Ownership of street must be defined to determine applicable codes, cul-de-sac may be required as well as a parking lot variance for number of driveways Provide unity of title for all of applicable properties II RECOMMENDATIONS 7 Recommend using melaleuca mulch instead of pine needle mulch MEH dim a t=iraill rev ", s\\ RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 195-076 TO Tambri Heyden, Director Planning & Zoning Department FROM Kevin J Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~~ RE: Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station DATE: February 16, 1995 The applicant should provide management plans for 1 the microsite areas 2 the reforestation areas These plans (documents) should be provided to protect the trees during construction (Clearing permit) KH ad ~ \ BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 94-033 '[0)1 ~ ill ~ ~ WI ~ ~I un FEB I 6 l"N~ ~ I February 16, 1995 PLANNING AND 3 ZONING DEPT. To Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director From Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Re SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES, 1ST REVIEW - NEW SITE PLAN BOYNTON BEACH TRI - RAIL STATION - PARKING LOT The Building Division would like to make the following comments that must be complied with prior to permitting 1 All signs shall comply with the Boynton Beach Sign Code, specifically Sections 21-23, Setbacks, Section 21-21, Aesthetics, Section 21-30, Sign Regulated and Permitted in Planned Districts, and Section 21-25, Signs Permitted and Regulated in All Commercial Non- Residential Districts 2 A detail of the light poles on heights and adequate penetration to comply with wind load requirements in Chapter 12 of Standard Building Code 3 Electric site lighting shall comply with Chapter 5, Article 10, Boynton Beach Code of Ordinance, including photometric ~~# Al New,- old AN mh cc William V Hukill, P E , Building Official A TRI RAIL TRC ,{')~ MEMORANDUM TO Tambri Beyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ~- /C:,- 75 DATE RE Site Plan Review - New Site Plan - 1st Review Project SoYtJ70""'; SMc.{-1 7f!..1 ~(f~1 L STA.'0 [)VJ The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the above referenced project There are no outstanding recreation related issues on this project ~f 00 ~ F: ~ ~ I:~ ,rn! PLANN1;~G AND o~ j ZON!N~EPl ~, .J I~ '\) MEMORANDUM UtIlIties #95-058 FROM John A. GUIdry, Duector of UtIlItIes TO Tambn J Heyden, Plannmg & Zo n DATE February 15, 1995 SUBJECT Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station New Site Plan - First Review Staff has revIewed the above referenced project and offers the followmg comments 1 A CapacIty ReservatIOn Fee wIll be reqUIred wIthin thirty (30) days of City CommIssIOn approval, or upon request for my sIgnature on the HRS/DEP permIt applIcatIOns. The fee amount Will be determmed based upon meter size or expected demand (Sec. 26-34 [ED. 2. Palm Trees and shrubs are only permItted m utilIty easements, (Sec 7 5-18 1) 3 Clearly show proposed utilIty easements for water and samtary sewer mams. A mmlmum of 12 feet or twIce the depth Will be reqUIred, (App C Art X, Sec 6 and Sec 2616[cD. 4 Plan shall specIfy meter sIze and locatIOn, (Sec 2616[cD 5 CIty water wIll not be supplIed for urigatwn, (CIty Comp Plan, PolIcy 3C.3 4) 6 ProvIde SIze and locatIOn of proposed sewer lateral, (Sec. 26 16[aD 7 Palm Beach Health Department permIts will be reqUIred for water and sanItary sewer mams, (Sec 2612) 8 Backflow preventors are reqUIred for certam uses, (Sec 26 107) 9 Please provIde a copy of a fire flow test to msure eXlstmg water system can supply the mmlmum commercial fire flow reqUIrements, (AppendIx C, Art. X, Sec. 16) 10 We request the water system be looped With the parcel to the north rather than create an exceptIOnally long dead-end, m accordance WIth Health Department deSIgn cntena. If possible, WIthout lImltmg fire flow capabIlity, the mam SIze may be reduced to 6 mch diameter 11 The UtilItIes Department suggests a meeting WIth UtIlIty personnel and the project engmeer, pnor to theIr second submIttal, to dISCUSS possible modIfications to the current water and sanItary sewer plans. It is our recommendatIOn that the plan proceed through the reVIew process. If you have any questIOns regardmg tlus subject, please contact SkIp Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404 19b xc Clyde "Slap" Milor Peter Mazzella f3-/ File ---~"-r-:' ; r- ,;:: ... lOJ S \ ; i \ \.'. '~:~~~2-.\ ~l.'i;. ltf\ lS ,-J ~~.,l ~\\J . !"\\ 0\ \ \ . - ; \ .... j ~\'\\j f~'-' i L- PU,~\N\NG. ~ND ~ j ZOh\NC uEP1,.~ --~ ----- ~~-~-" ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-03~ - 'j/hukL - e:; \~ ~ ~ f' ~~ 'fJU~ tU i;z%~ ~ ~-r .P~i~~ ? DATE. 2/13/95 TO. T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM. WILLIAM HUKILL, DEV DIR. KEN HALL, ENG AID~ SUBJECT. TRI-RAIL STATION SITE PLAN -1ST REVIE" The followmg comments and recommendatIOns are submitted for your consIderatIOn. I Remove the "eXIt only" dnveway at the S W corner of the parcel If traffic IS al10wed to eXIt here, there wi11 be a conflIct between traffic from the mam drIveway and those attemptmg to crossover to the southbound turn lane. Art 10, Sec 5-142{h){3) and (i){2) Recommendation An "exIt only" dnveway would be deSIrable for northbound traffic to go North on HIgh RIdge and West on Mmer Rd. If one could be constructed further north along the west property hne out to HIgh RIdge. 2 The southbound eXit lane onto HIgh RIdge Rd. should be Increased substantIal1y to facilItate vehIcular storage for both southbound and northbound traffic The present deSign restrIcts the effiCIent flow of northbound eXltmg traffic 3 A pedestnan sidewalk. should be constructed along the north side of the 50' "access parcel" to facIhtate access to the statIOn. App C Art. IX, Sec II Recommendation Perhaps the bike path/walkway can be relocated on the north sIde of the road to meet reqUIrement #3 4 The plan IS subject to satIsfactory pavmg, dram age and SIte hghtmg plans meetmg CIty codes at tIme of permIttmg. Other Recommendations A determmatIon should be made as to whether a traffic Impact analYSIs IS reqUIred. One concern regardmg egress from the SIte IS the lack of any clear hne of SIght for crossover traffic to see southbound HIgh RIdge Rd. traffic (due to the low road elevatIon north of the mtersectlOn) Thc mstallatlOn of a flashlllg hght may be warranted as part of thIS development which would become ful1y functIOnal at certam tIme penods when the eXItmg traffic reaches a certalll level. It IS also recommended that only the east half of the project be built at thIS tIme lllcludmg the North to South major dnveway The west half to be constructed as the demand for parkmg mcreases. pg. I of 2 ~ ~ :~,::~ ~ PM~,~l~%tPr? ;.V'" pg 2 of 2 We recommend that If "van accessible" spaces are marked for HIC parkmg, that they be strIped m accordance wIth the Fla. AccessibIhty Code whIch would be a mne foot stall and an eIght foot stnped accessibihty area. The slope of the walkway for the HIC stalls to the statIon should fall wIthm the lImIts allowed by the accessibihty code We recommend that the CIty not accept the access parcel" as a CIty road and be responsible for Its mamtenance and repair BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Office of ProfessIonal Standards -to f~ To From. Date Re. Tambn Heyden / DI~ect9r Lt. James Cummings _ 06 February 1995 Tn RaIl Statlon / SIte Plan RevIew TRC Memo # 95-0120 I have revIewed the plans for the Tn Rail StatIOn, and have no comments at thIS tIme. PLANNING AND \\ ",4\ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-17 TO Tambri J Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director \ THRU FROM Larry Quinn, Sanitation Superintendent SUBJ New Site Plan - Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station DATE February 3, 1995 The Public Works Department has no problems " h the above site Larry Quinn Sanitation Superintendent LQ/cr 00 ~ F:S ~: ~5 ~ 1001 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. - e ... t t PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-028 TO Carrie Parker, City Manager Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Al Newbold, Building Division Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept. Chief Field Insp. Lt. James Cummings, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist William HUk~trc~ Department of Development FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director DATE January 31, 1995 RE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1st Review - New Site Plan Project - Boynton Beach Tri-Rail Station Location - East of High Ridge Road just north of Gateway Boulevard Applicant File No. - Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority - MWSP 95-001 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above- referenced project. Site Plan Review approval for this project will be granted by the City Conunission. To ensure that the project stays on line with the review time frame, I request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and formal written conments transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on February 17, 1995. Do not return plans and exhibits. Retain same for the review of the amended plans (2nd review). Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Conunittee approval: 1 Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2 The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete based on the submittal requirements identified in Section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance. However, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/ or corrections should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and Zoning Department 3 Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. 4. Technical Review Conuni ttee member ( s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements. page 2 of 2 To. TRC Members Re Planning & Zoning Memo 95-028 5 When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified. 6 If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memo, within the time frame stated above, to the Planning and Zoning Director stating that the plans are approved and they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted to the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memo. Michael E. Haag will be the Planning and Zoning Department staff member coordinating the 1st review of the project. The Planning and Zoning Department will send the applicant a cover letter which includes the comment ( s) and directions to amend the plans to comply with the comments and the procedures for resubmission. When the Planning and Zoning Department receives the amended plans, they will distribute the plans with a cover memo to all TRC Members for review and approval. Attachment XC (Memo Only) Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief Charlie Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director Thomas Dettman, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Project File (original) Numbered File c lreview tri