APPLICATION
PROJECT NAME Gale Industries Inc.
LOCA TION. Lot 50-B Quantum Corporation Park, Park Ridge Blvd.
COMPUTER ID 55-000013
PERMIT #.
I FILE NO. NWSP 00-012 II TYPE OF APPLICATION New Site Plan I
AGENT/CONTACT PERSON OWNER/APPLICANT
Michael J Jaroch c/o Bentley Architects & Gale Industries, Inc.
Engineers, Inc. PHONE 904-304-2222
PHONE 407-331-6116 FAX. 904-304-2304
FAX. 407-331-4566 ADDRESS 2339 Benville Road, Daytona
ADDRESS 665 West Warren Avenue, Beach, Florida 332119
Longwood, Florida 32750
Date of submittal/Projected meetine: dates.
SUBMITTAL / RESUBMITTAL 7/12/00
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE N/A
PUBLIC NOTICE N/A
TRC MEETING 8/22/00
3rd Review 8/29/00
PROJECTED RESUBMITTAL DATE N/A
ACTUAL RESUBMITTAL DATE N/A
2ND REVIEW COMMENTS DUE N/A
LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS POSTED N/A
(SITE PLANS)
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD 9/12/00 Tabled
MEETING 10/24/00
CITY COMMISSION MEETING 11/08/00
COMMENTS
J .\SHRDA T A \Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Gale Industries Inc\PROJECT TRACKING INFO.doc
n . OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORID~ {,J ~ Ot;;f-
PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
FOR i i " ;
NEW SITE PLANS & MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTiNGSITE
Application Accepta~ce Date ~ ..u. il! 2
Fee Paid j 50. GO Receipt Number' Vj 0 d-- )L "~=L
-.".;...,.....~~~~
This application must be filled out completely, accurately and submitted as an original to the Planning and Zoning
Division. TWELVE COMPLETE, sequentially numbered, ASSEMBLED AND STAPLED sets of plans including
a recent survey and appropriate fee shall be submitted with the application for the initial process of the Site Plan
Review procedure AN INCOMPLETE SUBMITTAL WilL NOT BE PROCESSED
Please print legibly (in ink) or type all information
GENERAL INFORMATION
1 Project Name GALE INDUSTRIES. INC.
BRANCH WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE
2. Applicant's name (person or business entity in whose name this application is made)
GAT.E INDUSTRIES. INC.
Address
2339 BEVILLE RD , DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32119
Phone
904-304-2222
Fax:
904-304-2304
(Zip Code)
3 Agent's Name (person, if any, representing applicant) MICHAEL J. JAROCH
BENTLEY ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, INC.
Address
665 WEST WARREN AVENUE
LONGWOOD, FLORIDA
32750
(Zip Code)
Phone 407-331-6116
Fax:
407-331-4566
4 Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name GALE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Address 2339 BEVILLE RD., DAYTONA BEACH, FL 32119
(Zip Code)
Phone
904-304-2222
Fax:
5 Correspondence to be mailed to agent only; if no agent, then to applicant unless a substitute
is specified below'*
*This is the one address to which all agendas, letters and other materials will be mailed
6 What is applicant's interest in the premises affected? (owner, buyer, lessee, builder, developer,
contract purchaser, etc.)
OWNER
7 Street address or location of site LOT SO-B QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK. PARK RIDGE BLVD.
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33434
8 Property Control #.
Legal description of site LOT SOB & SOC QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTONBEACH. PlO PLAT NO. 10
ACCORDING TO THE PLOT THERE OF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE
COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 60
PAGE 34
9 Intended use(s) of site COMMF.Rr.TAT, I TNJ)rr~1'RTAT.
10 Developer or Builder' THE COLLAGE COMPANIES CONSTRUCTION
11 Architect: BRNTI.EY ARCHTTRCT~ & F.NGTNF.RR~p TNC.
12. landscape Architect: RUTH C. PERRY
13 Site Planner' NI A
14 Engineer' BENTLEY ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, INC.
15 Surveyor' HELLER-WEAVER & SHEREMETA, INC.
16 Traffic Engineer' N/A
17 Has a site plan been previously approved by the City Commission for this property? N
18 Estimated construction costs of proposed improvements shown on this site plan
$1.000.000.00
\I SITE DATA
The following information must be filled out below and must appear where applicable, on all copies of the site
plan
1
2.
3
4
land Use Cateoorv shown in the Comprehensive Plan
Zonino DistriC1V\~-QUALvrDM PARK AT BOYNTON BRACH
Area of Site 4. 2S. acres
land Use -- Acreaae Breakdown
/
v
185.130
sq. ft.
/a.
Residential, including
surrounding lot area
of grounds
acres
% of site
b Recreation Areas ...
(excluding water area)
acres % of site
acres % of site
acres % of site
acres 100' % of site
acres % of site
acres % of site
c. Water Area
d Commercial
e
Industrial
4.25.
f Publicllnstitutional
g Public, Private and
Canal rights-of-way
Planning and Zoning Division - Rev 10/15/1998
J:\SHRDA TA\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\FORMS\APPLlCA TIONS\NWSP\SITEPLAN.DOC
h
Other (specify)
acres
% of site
Other (specify)
acres
% of site
Total area of site 4.25 acres 100
% of site
* including open space suitable for outdoor recreation, and having a minimum dimension of 50 ft.
by 50 ft.
5 Surface Cover
a
Ground floor building .34 acres
area ("building footprint")
8
% of site
b
Water area
acres
% of site
c. Other impervious areas, including paved area of public & private streets, paved area of parking
lots & driveways (excluding landscaped areas), and sidewalks, patios, decks, and athletic courts
1.07 acres 25 % of site
d
Total impervious area -L.!U. acres 1'l
% of site
e
landscaped area
2.84 acres 67
% of site
inside of parking lots (20 sq ft. per interior parking space required - see Sec. 7 5-35(g) of
landscape Code)
f
Other landscaped areas,_ acres
% of site
g. Other pervious areas, including golf course, natural areas, yards, and swales, but excluding
water areas acres % of site
h. Total pervious areas 2.84 acres 67 % of site
Total area of site 4.25 acres 100 % of site
6 Floor Area
a. Residential sq ft.
b Commercial/Office sq ft.
c. 'ndustriallWarehouse 14,810 sq. ft.
d Recreational sq ft,
e Publicll nstitutional sq ft.
f Other (specify)
sq ft.
g Other (specify)
sq ft.
Planning and Zoning Division - Rev 10/15/1998
J:\SHRDA TA\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\FORMS\APPLlCA TIONS\NWSP\SITEPLAN.DOC
h
Total floor area
14.Rl0
sq ft.
7 Number of Residential Dwellinq Units
a.
Single-family detached
sq ft.
b
Duplex
sq ft.
c. Multi-Family (3 + attached dwelling units)
(1) Efficiency dwelling units
(2) 1 Bedroom dwelling units
(3) 2 Bedroom dwelling units
(4) 3+ Bedroom dwelling units
d
Total multi-family
dwelling units
e Total number of dwelling units
8
Gross Densitv
dwelling units per acre
9
Maximum heiqht of structures on site
28
feet
1
stories
10
Required off-street parkinq
a. Calculation of required
number of off-street
parking spaces
b
Off-street parking spaces
provided on site plan
1.5/3EMP X 50 EMP
42 PAVED
38 REQ'D SPACES
2 HANDICAP
17 GRASS
TOTAL
61 SPACES
Representative of the project must be present at all Technical Review Committee, Planning
and Development and City Commission meetings held to review this project.
Planning and Zoning Division - Rev 10/15/1998
J:\SHRDA TA\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\FORMS\APPLlCA TIONS\NWSP\SITEPLAN.DOC
Jul-11-00 04:32P
P 06
III CERTIFICATION
(I) (We) understand that this application and all papers and plans submitted herewith become a
part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Division (I) 0Ne) hereby certify that the
above statements and any statements or showings in any papers or plans submitted herewith are
true to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and belief This application will not be accepted unless
signed according to instructions below
01 I. z...{7--DO ()
Date
IV AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT
~ L ,i ~
rv (JJ,/I/' for t'\,ch4oLl -:r: To-roc/'
Signature of Authorized Agent
'1112../ AOO 0
Dat
(I) 0Ne) hereby designate the above signed person as (my) (our) authorized agent in regard to this
application.
Df /t -z--/ z..-OOQ
Date '
Signature Owner( or Trustee
or Authorized Princi al if property is owned
by a corporation or other business entity
SPACE BELOW THIS LINE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Review Schedule.
Date Received
Technical Review Committee
Planning & Development Board
Community Appearance Board
City Commission
Date
Date
Date
Date
Stipulations of Final Approval.
Other Government Agencies/Persons to be contacted:
Additional Remarks:
A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROJECT MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL TRC, P&D
AND CC MEETINGS HELD TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT
Planning and Zoning Division - Rev 10/15/1998
J:\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\FORMS\APPUCA T10NS\NWSP\SITEPlAN.DOC
Jul-ll-00 04 35P
P 10
RIDER TO SITE PLAN APPLICATION
The undersigned as applicant for Final Site Plan Approval does hereby acknowledge represent and agree that
all plans, specifications drawings, engineering and other data submitted with this application for review by the
City of Boynton Beach shall be reviewed by the various boards commissions staff personnel and other parties
designated, appointed or employed by the City of Boynton Beach, and any such party reviewing the same shall
rely upon the accuracy thereof and any change in any item submitted shall be deemed material and substantial.
The undersigned hereby agrees that all plans, specifications drawings, engineering and other data which
may be approved by the City of Boynton Beach, or its boards, commissions, staff or designees shall be
constructed in strict compliance with the form in which they are approved and any change to the same shall be
deemed material and shall place the applicant in violation of this application and all approvals and permits which
may be granted.
The applicant agrees to allow the City of Boynton Beach all rights and remedies as provided for by the
applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach to bring any violation into compliance, and the
applicant shall indemnify, reimburse and save the City of Boynton Beach harmless from any cost, expense claim,
liability or any action which may arise due to their enforcement of the same.
~
20<:0
,-+9 .
Planning and Zoning Division - Rev 10/15/1998
J:\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\FORMS\APPLICATlONS\NWSP\SITEPlAN.COC
...
Bentley Architects & Engineers
665 W Warren Avenue
Longwood, FL 32750
(407) 331-6116 Fax: (407) 331-4566
Email.bae@baeonline.com
Letter of Transmittal
To
Dept. of Development, Planmng &
Zomng DIVISIon
Date:
7/12/00
100 E Baynton Beach Blvd.
Project: Gale Industnes, Boynton
Beach, FL
POBox 310
Job No 2000-07
Boynton Beach, Flonda 33425-0310
Attn
(561) 742-6267
LUSIa Galow
We are sending you [ ] attached (OR) [ ] under separate cover via. hand delivery
the following items:
1 check $750 NO 9461, 1application to City of Boynton Beach
2 Drainage calculations,
12 sets civil plans, landscape, & survey
1 Architectural plans. colored presentation elevation, finish board, floor plan
The above was sent:
( ) For your use
( ) As requested
( X) For review and approval
( ) Other
cc' file
by" Mike Jaroch - vlo
III CERTIFICATION
(I) (We) understand that this application and all papers and plans submitted herewith become a
part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Division (I) (yVe) hereby certify that the
above statements and any statements or showings in any papers or plans submitted herewith are
true to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and belief This application will not be accepted unless
signed according to the instructions below
Signature of Owner(s) or Trustee, of
Authorized Principal if property is owned by
a corporation or other business entity
Date
IV
l1/e ~ J 0hfl-ot.H
1 /; / htJl)lJ
Date
(I) (yVe) hereby designate the above signed person as (my) (our) authorized agent in regard to this
application.
Signature of Owner(s) or Trustee,
or Authorized Principal if property is owned
by a corporation or other business entity
Date
SPACE BELOW THIS LINE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Review Schedule
Date Received
Technical Review Committee
Planning & Development Board
Community Appearance Board
City Commission
Date
Date
Date
Date
Stipulations of Final Approval.
Other Government Agencies/Persons to be contacted:
Additional Remarks
A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROJECT MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL TRC, P&D
AND CC MEETINGS HELD TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT
Planning and Zoning Division - Rev 10/15/1998
J:\SHRDA T A\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\FORMS\APPLlCA TIONS\NWSP\SITEPLAN.DOC
PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
QUANTUM PARK LOT 50-B
4.250-ACRE PARCEL
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
AUGUST 2000
For
The Collage CompanIes
585 Technology Park, SUIte 100
Lake Mary, Flonda 32746
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
1001 North U.S. Highway 1, Suite 304
Jupiter, Florida 33477
561-743-5141
EP00066
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II METHODS 1
III. RESULTS 3
A. SoIls 3
B VegetatIve CommumtIes 3
C LIsted SpecIes 6
D Wetlands 6
IV SUMMARY 6
REFERENCES 7
LIST OF FIGURES
FIgure 1
FIgure 2
FIgure 3
SIte LocatIOn Map
Soils Map
VegetatIOn CommunItIes Map
2
4
5
PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
QUANTUM PARK LOT 50-B
4.250 ACRE PARCEL
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
I. INTRODUCTION
EnvIronmental ServIces, Inc , (ESI) conducted a prelImmary envIronmental assessment to determme
the occurrence of any jUnSdIctIOnal wetlands, natIve upland vegetatIOn, or lIsted specIes of plants
and wIldlIfe that may eXIst on the 4.250-acre property located on Park Rldge Boulevard m SectIOn
20, TownshIp 45 South, Range 43 East, Boynton Beach, Flonda (FIgure 1) The sIte IS currently
undeveloped. ThIS report documents the results of the assessment.
II. METHODS
Palm Beach County aenal photographs (1995), topographIc maps (USGS T opograpmc Map, Delray
Beach, Flonda, Quadrangle, 1983) and mapped soIls (Soil Survey of Palm Beach County Area,
Florida, USDA, SCS 1978) of the property were revIewed pnor to the sIte VISIt for purposes of
10catmg potentIal wetlands and tYPIcal vegetatIve commumtIes.
An ESI SCIentIst VISIted the property on 25 August 2000 and conducted a prelImmary envIronmental
assessment by walkmg a senes of comprehensIve pedestnan transects across the SIte to document the
occurrence of any JUrISdIctIOnal wetlands, natIve upland vegetatIOn, or lIsted speCIes of plants and
wIldlIfe. A field map of the vegetatIon aSSOCiatIOns was prepared and notes on plants and WIldlIfe
observed were made m a field book.
Wetland protectIOn IS mandated under both federal and state regulatIOns. The U S Army Corps of
Engmeers (CE) regulates actIVItIes m Waters of the Umted States pursuant to the Clean Water Act
(PL92-500 SectIOn 404) as further defined m the CE regulatory program (33 CFR 320-330) The
State of Flonda Department of EnVIronmental ProtectIOn (DEP) has establIshed wetland
IdentIficatIOn and permIttmg processes at Chapter 62-330, 62-340, and 62-312 of the Flonda
AdmmIstratIVe Code (F AC) Current federal and state wetland defimtIOns are denved from the
orIgmal defimtIOn found m 33 CFR 328.3, IdentIfymg wetlands as "those areas that are mundated, or
saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duratIon suffiCIent to support, a prevalence
of vegetatIOn tYPIcally adapted to lIfe m saturated soil condItIons" DelIneatIOn of federally
regulated jUnSdIctIOnal wetlands IS determmed by the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual (USAE Waterways Expenment StatIon EnVIronmental Laboratory 1987). DelIneatIOn of
wetlands regulated by DEP and South Flonda Water Management DIstnct (SFWMD) IS done
accordmg to Chapter 62-340 FAC, DelIneatIOn of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface
Waters. The Florida Wetlands Delineation Manual (GIlbert et al. 1995) serves as a gUIde to Chapter
62-340 Both manuals, WhICh emphasIze the IdentIficatIon ofhydnc soils, hydrophytIc vegetatIOn,
and wetland hydrologIC condItIons In makmg wetland determmatIons, were used m thIS
InVestIgatIOn.
.~~
~:..tt.~
~
"1090 "::'
'>~
to
en
.D
ta
~
Gl
C
.{'~.~t:~
.....' . ~
Ole
9\
u.. oc
~....
.-
Galeway Boulevan:l
Ole Ole Ole
6.t 6S-A 6S-B
:us> oc I.JlIJ. ..-.. Ole
82
c ..-..
,,:' c>.tif ..
~- .,~ Ole li
-..
Savill FIoricIa Waler Managemenl DislliCt C-\6 Canal
Scale' NTS
~ ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC
JupIter, Florida
QUANTUM PARK LOT 50-B
Boynton Beach, Flonda
Figure
Date:
Project No.
Site LocatIon Map
1 N
August 2000
EP00066 i
LIsted specIes of plants and wildlIfe are found m Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species
and Species of Special Concern, Official Lists (Flonda Game and Fresh Water FISh COITllnISSIOn
1997) and Preservation of Native Flora of Florida, Chapter 5B-40 (Flonda Department of
Agnculture and Consumer ServIces, DIVISIOn of Plant Industry, October 1998) Any occurrences of
lIsted speCIes were mapped on an aenal photograph. VegetatIOn aSSOCIatIOns were IdentIfied m
accordance WIth Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System Handbook (FLUCFCS)
(Flonda Department of TransportatIOn 1999).
III. RESUL TS
A. Soils
The mapped soil of the property IS Pomello fine sand (FIgure 2). Pomello fine sand IS a
nearly level to gently slopmg, moderately well dramed, deep, sandy soIl. The natural
vegetatIOn thIS soIl typIcally supports IS slash pme (Pinus elliottii), sand pme (Pinus clausa),
scrub oak (Quercus inopina), saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), gallberry (flex glabra),
fetterbush (Lyonia lucida), and natIve grasses. Pomello fine sand was present m the mIddle
portIOn of the property The rest of the soIl on the SIte IS fill matenal, very SImIlar to the soIl
classIfied as Arents-urban land complex m Soil Survey of Palm Beach County Area, Florida.
ThIS complex conSIsts of nearly level, somewhat poorly dramed, sandy soils, and urban land.
B. Vegetative Communities
VegetatIOn eXIstmg on the property was mapped and classIfied by FLUCFCS dunng the SIte
VISIt. The SIte vegetatIOn conSIsts of a mIxture of scrub, exotIC, and nUIsance trees, landscape
plants, and herbaceous weedy vegetatIOn. The northern portIOn of the property was planted
WIth natIve trees and landscape plants. Two vegetatIOn communItIes were IdentIfied on the
SIte, Mixed Hardwoods, FLUCFCS 439, and Urban Land m tranSItIOn WIthout POSItIve
mdIcators ofmtended actIvIty FLUCFCS 193 (FIgure 3)
1 Mixed Hardwoods. VegetatIOn mcludes a canopy WIth sand pme and scrub
oak. The sub-canopy and ground cover mclude scrub oak, palafoxIa (Palafoxia
feayi), tallow-wood (Ximenia americana), staggerbush (Lyonia jruticosa),
cottonweed (Froelichia jloridana), jomtweed (Polygonella polygama), rosemary
(Ceratiola ericoides), erect scrub spurge (Euphosbia polyphylla), huckleberry
(Vaccinium myrsinites), partndge-pea (Chamaecrista fasciculata), scattered paw paw
(Asimina reticulata), scrub clover (Delafeayi), gopher apple (Licania michauxii),
sand spike moss (Selaginella arenicola), SpanIsh moss (Tillandsia useneoides), love
vme (Cassythafiliformis), southern fox grape (Vitis rotundifolia), and scattered wild
pme (Tillandsia recurvata) m the scrub oak.
3
Scale: 1 '=1667"
W1 ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC
Jupiter, Florida
QUANTUM PARK LOT 50-B
Boynton Beach, FlorIda
Figure
Date'
Project No.
Site Soils Map
2
August 2000
EPOOO66
N
1
!
ell
....~..).....
<,
. I I
1\
L "'
W"
FLUCFCS 439 = Mixed Hardwoods
FLUCFCS 193 = Urban Land in transition without positive indicators of mtended activity
Scale: 1"=200'
Wd. ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
Jupiter, Flonda
QUANTUM PARK LOT 50-B
Boynton Beach, Flonda
Vegetative Community Map
Figure 3 N
Date: August 2000 l
Project No. EP00066 1
2 Urban Land m transitIOn wIthout posItIve mdIcators of mtended actIvIty
VegetatIOn mcludes scattered exotIcs such as earleaf acaCia (Acacia
auriculiformis), BrazilIan pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and AustralIan
pme (Casuarina equisetifolia) Southern fox grape, love vme, false button
weed (Spermacoce verticillarta), wedelIa (Wedelia trilobata), pnckly pear
cactus (Opuntia compressa), SpanIsh needle (Bidens pilosa), dog fennel
(Eupatorium capillifolium), bahIa grass (Paspalum notatum), and vanous
weedy herbaceous plants and grasses.
c. Listed Species
No specIes of plants regulated by the Flonda Department of Agnculture and Consumer
ServIces were observed on the property
One lIsted speCIes of wildlIfe, the gopher tortOIse (Gopherus polyphemus), was observed on
the property The gopher tortOIse IS lIsted as a SpeCIes of SpecIal Concern by Flonda FISh
and WildlIfe ConservatIon COImmsSIOn (FFWCC) The gopher tortOIse populatIOn on the
property comprises approxImately 2 or 3 mdIvIduals. A more accurate estImate could not be
made because property boundanes were not surveyed and marked pnor to the SIte VISIt.
Once property boundarIes are marked m the field, a separate tortOIse burrow survey will need
to be conducted to determme the number oftortOIses on Lot 50-B
D. Wetlands
No wetlands occur on the property
IV SUMMARY
The property contams an area of natural scrub vegetatIOn With varymg degrees of dIsturbance. The
dIsturbance mcludes dumpmg of trash, prevIOUS cleanng actIVItIes, and encroachment of exotIC and
nUIsance plant speCIes. Local government ordmances may reqUIre preservatIOn or relocatIOn of
mdI VIdual natIve trees and plants. AddItIOnally, m accordance With the Quantum Park Development
Order and WIth local government rules, all exotIC plant speCIes occurnng on the property must be
eradIcated. All earleaf acaCia, AustralIan pme, and BrazIlIan pepper WhICh occur on the SIte must be
removed durmg the development process. Any Impacts to the gopher tortOIse populatIOn or tortOIse
habItat must be permItted by FFWCC PermIts Issued by FFWCC mclude off-SIte and on-SIte
relocatIon permIts. After revIewmg the SIte plan, ESI recommends that gopher tortOIses be relocated
off-SIte.
6
REFERENCES
Flonda Department of Agnculture and Consumer ServIces, DIVIsIon of Plant Industry October
1998 PreservatlOn ofNatlVe Flora of Flonda, Chapter 5B-40
Flonda Department of TransportatlOn. 1999 Flonda Land Use, Cover & Forms ClasslficatlOn
System Handbook. Tallahassee, Flonda. 91 p
Flonda Game and Fresh Water FISh ComrmsslOn. 1997 Flonda's Endangered SpecIes, Threatened
SpecIes and SpecIes of SpecIal Concern, OfficIal LIStS. Tallahassee, Flonda. 15p
GIlbert K., 1 Tobe, R. Cantrell, M. Sweeley and 1 Cooper 1995 The Flonda Wetlands
DelmeatlOn Manual. The Flonda Department ofEnvlfonmental ProtectlOn, South Flonda Water
Management DIstnct, St. 10hns R1ver Water Management DIstnct, Suwanee RIver Water
Management DIstnct, and Northwest Flonda Water Management DIstrict. 197 p
U S Department of Agnculture, Sol1 ConservatlOn ServIce. 1978 Sol1 Survey of Palm Beach
County Area, Flonda. 132 p + maps.
USAE Waterways Expenment StatlOn Envlfonmental Laboratory 1987 Corps of Engmeers
Wetlands DelmeatlOn Manual, TechnIcal Report Y-87-1, US Army Engmeer Waterways
Expenment Station, VIcksburg, Miss.
7
July 2000
Drainage Calculations
Gale Industries,
Boynton Beach
Park Ridge Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Submitted to:
City of Boynton Beach
South Florida Water Management District
..
~~~
BENTLEY ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, INC. ~~
665 W est Warren A venue
Longwood, Flonda 32750
(407) 331-6116 Fax (407) 331-4566
SECTION I
COMPUTATIONS
Table of Contents
DRAINAGE NARRATIVE
IntroductIOn
Data CollectIOn
Techmcal DeSIgn Sources
EXlstmg CondItIons
Hydrology / Hydrauhcs
o Basm Areas
Proposed DeSIgn Approach
Soils
To's
Control Structures / WeIr Crest
Recovery AnalYSIS (MODRET)
Pond DeSIgn
o Routmg
COMPUTATIONS
Stage-Storage ComputatIOns
PollutIon Abatement CalculatIOns
ICPR Modelmg AnalYSIS
POND 1 (Pre-developed & Post-developed)
o 25Year/72Hour - Lmk MaXImum CondItIons
o 25Year/72Hour - Nodal MaXImum CondItIons
o 25Year/72Hour - Basm MaXImum CondItIons
o 25Year/72Hour - ICPR Input Report
MODRET Recovery AnalYSIS
CN ComputatIon - post condItIon only
APPENDIX (VOLUME 2)
AppendIX A.
Soils Report by' Umversal Engmeenng SCIences. (Under Separate Cover)
DRAINAGE DESIGN
GALE INDUSTRIES - BOYNTON BEACH FLORIDA
INTRODUCTION
Gale Industnes proposes to construct a warehouse dIstributIOn facIlIty wIthm Quantum
Corporate Park m Boynton Beach, Flonda. ThIS park IS a PID currently approved and
permItted by The CIty of Boynton Beach and (South Flonda Water Management DIstnct
(SFWMD) Gale Industnes WIll own and operate the proposed on-sIte stormwater
management system.
Gale Industnes IS proposmg to buIld the aforementIOned facIlItIes m one phase, whIch WIll
mclude the appropnate erOSIOn control measures as shown on the plans and speCIfied m the
notes. The total property area owned by Gale Industnes IS 4.25 +/- acres for Lot 50B and
1 16+/- for Lot 50C The proposed project area (developed portIOn - lImIted to Lot 50B) IS
4.25 acres (+/-) wIth an estImated proposed ImpervIOUS area of 1 41 Ac
DATA COLLECTION
The followmg IS a lIst of references that were acqUIred and used as aIds m the desIgn of
thIS proJ ect.
LISt of Reference data.
1 The SOlI Survey of Palm Beach County, as publIshed by the Umted States
Department of Agnculture SOlI ConservatIOn ServIce (SCS)
2 The Lantana, Flonda, Quadrangle Map, as publIshed by the Umted States
GeologIcal Survey (USGS)
3 SoIls mformatIOn (SOlI bonngs, water table elevatIOns) as provIded by Umversal
Engmeenng SCIences
4 SIte Survey as provIded by Hellar-Weaver & Sherametta, Inc
5 Copy of eXIstmg SFWMD stormwater approved permIt (for the master
development plan - Quantum Corp Park PermIt #50-90070-S)
2
TECHNICAL DESIGN SOURCES
In addItIon to the above lIsted resource documents and data the followmg IS a lIst of reference
techmcal sources utIlIzed m the desIgn of thIS proJect.
1) FDOT Dramage Manual
2) SCS TechnIcal Release 55 (TR-55)
3) ICPR V2 11 (Streamlme TechnologIes)
4) SJRWMD Chapter 40C-42 FAC
(Chapter 14 - Pond DesIgn)
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The project sIte IS approxImately 4.25 acres of undeveloped property wlthm Quantum
Corporate Park and IS located m the CIty of Boynton Beach, Flonda. The property owner
owns both lots SOB and 50C All the proposed development IS proposed to take place on
Lot SOB as Lot 50C IS made up of mostly a canal and FP&L power easement. A sIte
survey was performed and supplIed to us by Heller-Weaver & Sherametta, Inc The spot
elevatIOns provIded were used to generate a DIgItal Terram Model (DTM) and contours
were developed from the DTM. At thIS tIme, the property IS undeveloped wIth some spOIl
plIes eXlstmg on-sIte, The sIte vanes from open grass areas to moderately wooded areas
wIth mlmmal underbrush. The sIte drams m two dIrectIons, Lot SOB drams VI overland
flow to the north and west whIle Lot 50C drams to the south dIrectly mto the C-16 canal.
All off sIte runoff commg onto the project sIte m the pre-developed condItIon IS accounted
for by provldmg the appropnate storage volume m the retentIOn facIlIty No changes to the
eXlstmg dramage patterns are bemg proposed at thIS tIme. Lot SOB dIscharge (from the
proposed pond wIll dIscharge mto the eXlstmg mlet/plpe along Park RIdge Blvd as
specIfied m the ongmal SFWMD for Quantum Corporate Park.
HYDROLOGY / HYDRAULICS
Basm Areas
AttenuatIOn IS not reqUIred for thIS development as specIfied m the ongmal SFWMD
stormwater permIt for Quantum Corporate Park. Therefore no evaluatIOn between the pre
and post-developed condItIons was necessary A post analYSIS routmg model was
3
performed to assure no adverse effects would result from the proposed stormwater
management system and especIally the modIfied Type F - FDOT mlet, wIth a weIr
structure mSlde. Also the sIte hes wlthm Basm 1 of the ongmal permIt (ExhibIt 2) and
reqUIres a mlmmum fimshed floor elevatIon of 1450 ft-NGVD to protect agamst the 100
year flood elevatIOn, ThIS sIte m It'S entIrety hes well above the 1450 elevatIOn IdentIfied
m the ongmal permIt, WhIch mcludes our FF El for the bUIldmg of 22 50
DESIGN APPROACH
SOlIs
The SCS soIl survey (page map 106) mdlcates the sOlIs wlthm the project sIte are
compnsed of the St-Lucle (ScB) and/or Quartzlpsamments (QAB) senes, WhIch are
classIfied as an "A" type soIl The SCS survey estImates the seasonal hIgh groundwater
table (SHWT) to be > 6 0 feet below grade and the permeabIlIty> 20 0 mches per hour for
thIS sOlI senes. Umversal Engmeenng SCIences has completed a geotechmcal analysIs of
the onslte sOlIs and theIr IS geotechnIcal report wIth bonng logs, estImated the Seasonal
High Water Table (SHWT), and permeabIlIty rate can be found m the appendIX, under
separate cover
TIme of ConcentratIOn (Tel
The Post-developed T c = 10 0 mmutes, was estImated based on engmeenng Judgement
and should be consIdered conservatIve, The post Tc was used m the hydraulIc pond
routmg model to determme the performance of the system and the control structure. ThIS
exerCIse IS not reqUIred under the current condItIons speCIfied on the eXlstmg SFWMD
stormwater permIt for the Park.
Control Structure/WeIr Crest
Retention Pond!. The weIr crest - control elevatIOn (EL = 1440) for the proposed Pond
was set to prOVIde addItIonal treatment volume (in excess of what IS reqUIred by the
SFWMD stormwater permIt) The dIscharge from thIS pond wIll be through the modIfied
FDOT Type F mlet (WIth an mternal weIr structure) to the eXlstmg storm sewer system
servmg the park, conSIstent WIth the eXlstmg condItIOn. The proposed desIgn meets the
4
SFWMD treatment volume whIle the routmg shows that the pond can handle the 25year
72hour storm event. Lastly, for the Pond, a skImmer IS WIll be proVIded mSIde the control
structure to ensure that greases and trash wIll not dIscharge from the proposed system.
Recovery AnalysIs (MODRET)
Recovery analysIs was performed for both the Pond usmg the MODRET software
program. Because the sOlIs are Type "A" SOlIs the ponds recovered the pollutIOn
abatement volume m the reqUIred 72 0 hours as specIfied by SFWMD The mput, along
wIth the output results, are proVIded m thIs sectIOn of the document.
Pond DesIgn - Routmgs
The Pond routmg calculatIOns were performed usmg AdICPR VerSIOn 2.11 (Smghofen and
AssocIates) for the 25 year 72 hour storm event to determme the performance of the
proposed system. Agam, thIs exerCIse IS not reqUIred by eIther the CIty of Boynton Beach
or SFWMD For the 25year172hour storm event, a peak dIscharge of 22.20 cfs IS
expenenced as well as a DesIgn High Water ElevatIOn of 1493 The routmg mput and
output are also mcluded.
g: \user2\2000proj eets \2000-07\\Drainage N arr .doe
July 12,2000
5
Gale Insulation - Boynton Beach Florida
POND 1
(provided to hold the first 1/2" of runoff)
Proposed Stage - Storage Data
Average Storage
Elev Area Area Volume
ft-NGVD) (ft^2) Ac. (ft^2) Ac-ft
Contour elevation 1380 15355 0 0.353 000 0000 Bottom
Contour elevation 1390 15675,8 0360 036 0036
Contour elevation 14.20 16638.2 0382 037 0147
Contour elevation 1440 17279.8 0397 039 0.225
Contour elevation 1460 17921 4 0411 040 0306
Contour elevation 1432 17032.8 0.391 040 0194 PAY (REQ'D)
Contour elevation 1440 17279.8 0.397 0.38 0.225 PAY (PRV'D)
Contour elevation 1580 21771 0 0500 045 0852
Contour elevation 1630 23375.0 0537 0.52 1 111 Top
1) Computations from CADD design file for "Proposed" conditions for Retention Pond Areas taken
from reading the contour areas proposed for Retention Pond in the CADD design file
2) Storage-volume relationship computed using the "average end area" method
3) Minimum design criteria.
a) Drawdown treatment volume in 72 0 hours after storm event.
b) Design side slopes, 4 1 (min)
c) Provide SFWMD required treatment volume (1/2" over basin).
d) Attenuation. non-required (check 25yr/72hr)
e) Recover through pecolation/infiltration
f) Pollution Abatement Volume Computations
Post Lot 50B Proposed Area.
Post Lot 50B Proposed IMP Area.
4 65 Ac
1 51 Ac
(0 5" 1 12in/ft) * basin area
Ac-ft
o 194 Ac-ft
PAY Required
PAY Provided
0194 SFWMD
0.225
F.IUSERI99-28SDSK\DOCSIEXCELICALCSIPond-calcs.xls
3:33 AM 7/12/00
ICPR
POST DEVELOPED
ROUTING ANALYSIS
Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2 11) [1]
Copyright 1995 Streamline Technologies, Inc
HYDRAULIC CHECK OF POND AND CONTROL STRUCTURE
BASIN SUMMARY REPORT 25YR/72HR STORM
07/11/00
**********
Basin Sunmary
***
Basin Name
Group Name
Node Name
Hydrograph Type
Unit Hydrograph
Peaking Factor
Spec Time Inc (min)
Comp Time Inc (min)
Rainfall Fi le
Rainfall Amount (in)
Storm Duration (hr)
Status
Time of Cone (min)
Lag Time (hr)
Area (acres)
Vol of Unit Hyd (in)
Curve Number
DCIA (%)
Time Max (hrs)
Flow Max (ds)
Runoff Volume (in)
Runoff Volume (cf)
2572 ************************************************
POST
BASE
POND1
UH
UH484
484 00
1 33
1 33
S F\.IMD 72
13 80
72 00
ONSIlE
10 00
o 00
4 25
1 00
59 90
o 00
60 00
23 39
8 10
124889
Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2 11) [1]
Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc
HYDRAULIC CHECK OF POND AND CONTROL STRUCTURE
NODAL MAXIMUM CONDITIONS REPORT 25YR/72HR STORM
07/11/00
********** Node Maximum Conditions 2572 **********************************************************************************
.(Time units hours)
Node Group Max Time Max Stage Warning Max Delta Max Surface Max Time Max Inflow Max Time Max Outflow
Name Name Conditions (ft) Stage (ft) Stage (ft) Area (sf) I nfl ow (cfs) Outflow (cfs)
OF FS ITE BASE 24 06 13 00 14 50 o 0184 o 00 60 01 22 20 o 00 o 00
POND1 BASE 60 01 14 93 15 80 o 0098 18980 45 59 99 23 29 60 01 22 20
Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2 11) [1]
Copyright 1995 Streamline Technologies Inc
HYDRAULIC CHECK OF POND AND CONTROL STRUCTURE
lINK MAXIMUM CONDITIONS REPORT 25YR/72HR STORM
07/11/00
********** link Maximum Conditions 2572 ****************************************************************
.(Time units
link
Name
WEIR1
hours)
Group Max Time
Name Flow
Max Flow
(cfs)
Max Del ta Q
(cfs)
BASE
60 01
22 20
o 57
Max Time
U/S Stage
60 01
Max US Stage
(ft)
14 93
Max Time
D/S Stage
24 06
Max OS Stage
(ft)
13 00
Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2 11) [1]
Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc
25YR/72 HOUR STORM EVENT
HDRAULIC CHECK OF POND & CONTROL STRUCTURE
07/11/2000
********** Input Report ********************************************************
Class Node-
Name OFFSITE Base Flow(cfs) 0
Group: BASE Length(ft) 0
COlllllent OFFSITE BOUNDAY NODE (EXISTING 48"
Init Stage(ft) 7 7
Yarn Stage(ft) 14 5
STORM PIPE)
Time(hrs)
o
24
Stage(ft)
7 7
13
Class Node-
Name POND1 Base Flow(cfs)
Group BASE Length(ft)
Comment PROPOSED SHALLOY RETENTION
o
o
FACILITY
Init Stage(ft)
Yarn Stage(ft)
138
15 8
Stage(ft)
138
16 3
Area(ac)
o 352
o 537
Class Basin-
Basin POST Node
Group: BASE
Unit Hydrograph
Rainfall File
Rainfall Amount(in)
Area(ac)
Curve #:
DCIA(%)
POND1
Status On Site
Type SCS Unit Hydr
UH484
SHIMD72
13 8
4 25
59 9
o
Peak Factor 484
Storm Duration(hrs) 72
Concentration Time(min) 10
Lag Time(hrs) 0
POST DEVELOPED SITE
Class Yeir- -
Name YEIR1
Group: BASE
Count 1
From Node POND1
To Node OFFSITE
Type Horiz
Flow Both
Geometry. Rectangular
Span( in) 48
Rise(in) 59 4
Invert(ft) 14 4
Control Elev(ft) 14 4
TABLE
Bottom Clip(in) 0
Top Cl ip( in) 0
Yeir Discharge Coef 3 2
Orifice Discharge Coef 0 6
YEIR STRUCTURE INSIDE OF INLET
Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2 11) [2]
Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies Inc
25YR/72 HOUR STORM EVENT
HDRAULIC CHECK OF POND & CONTROL STRUCTURE
07/11/2000
********** Input Report ********************************************************
Class Simulation--
F \USER\2000-07\ICPR\2572
Execution Both
Header HYDRAULIC CHECK OF POND AND CONTROL STRUCTURE
$$DATE$$
HYDRAULICS
Max Delta Z (ft) 1
Delta Z Factor 0 01
Time Step Optimizer 0
Drop Structure Optimizer 0
Sim Start Time(hrs) 0
Sim End Time(hrs) 72
Min Calc Time(sec) 0 5
Max Calc Time(sec) 300
To Hour PInc(min)
o 15
72 15
GROUP SE LECT IONS
+ BASE [07/11/00]
HYDROLOGY
Override Defaults No
To Hour
o
72
PInc(min)
15
15
MODRET
RECOVERY ANALYSIS
01
-"
0
-" Z
01 '"T1
~ r
Q) -I
x ~
:E I\.) )>
0 ~
Q)
- 0
CD
.., z
m I\.)
CD 01
< =! G')
Q) 3 )>
-
,5' row r
::J :To m
II ..., Z
CJl
........ -- en
~ c
........ w r
-..,J 01 )>
~ -I
0
~ Z
0
~
01
01
0
01
01
Water Elevation (ft)
-"
~
o
* 11 g
-\ ~ <3
~ 3 3-
c 'ij. ~ to '0 ..... 0 g 9;:1c
~ 3-..1 $ 1.1' > ~ g
> 1.1' CP (::) ~ '> ;~\
v '" .
~::> i::> > ..... tv
(1) ..... ..... 0
'3 ~::> C1' ..... g
~ {P,
..... U!. '"
~ ~
~ ~.
g- o
~
---- ~
(1) .....
Ii> >
5 ~ ~
\,JJ ~ '> ..... 'N .....
..... ct... ..... ~ ~ ..... > tv ~';2.~
C ~ \,JJ \,JJ (::) ~ ~ ~
5 <'p".>J t ...0 ...0 i~~
-..1 <s C/:l ~ 'Cf, -.l 1.1' \,JJ
~ @~ ..... ...0 ..... .c-,;1'"
0 1.1' 0"
..... %.
~ "0
g ~
""
" '"
- --- '"'" ~
~% ~
0 0 0 0 0 ~~; ~
0 0 0 (::) i..>J i..rI ~ ~~~ tn
0 0 (::) (::)
(::) i::> ~ $ <8- 0
0 ~ w, ..... 'Q.~~
..... ..... 'C5 > g ~ \t (i\
~ ~ 'a- 'a- ~ *
...0 ~S~
cP ..... Qt
%,C ~
U) ~
~
c.
~ 0
:)
~~~
0 0 0 0 ~%"'
0 0 i::>
0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ > ~ "
0 (::) i::> ~ > ~
i::> i::> to ~ > w,
..... ~ C1' ..... 0 ~S"'
~ g $ ~ tA ~ ..... ..... U"I
8 %.
;<:.
~ ....
@
---- $
~ i i
C1'
5 tI\
~~ C
c ~
" \OJ""
.....'0
0 0 0 0 ~ ;c::.
0 0 g g
0 0 0 g g <3 "'
g <3 g g
\ \
~
3
~
~
;..(.
o
-n
~
~
~
U'l
~
o
o
~
~
/ -~----- ----------------------
C')
mQ.a
-~c
~bi::l
Ql:::lc.
g.g~
:::ld'~
o 0 III
....m...
~o.n
Ql '76 0
~oa
.., .... 0
1(;-0_
'" 0 -n
nta.~
g
i
11
1./1 Ql
~ ~ g
~ 10 ~ ..,
If! ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ a 5
j:!. <:. ..,
~ (1) g
l;f; ..,
l;f; 0 ~_
o ;;\ Ql
~ ~
10 '76 .z
(1) 0.
n ~ ~
~ :R ~
Q. ~. n
(1) ~ g
~ 0.
o ~ c:
~ ll] a
o -' "'.
6. ~ ~
~ 1./1
~ ~
~ ~
~. ~
g ~
-\ ~
~ ~
g. '6,'
l
-;
So
n'
g
~
g.
-n
"
C
i
..
f""
~
~
~
c
~
~
..,
~
~
<:::.
(1)
a.
&
.z
0.
..,
~
f';
~
c:
a
"'.
~
ill
ill (1)
o ill 1'9 <:.
(t ~ iil ~
~ !:!!. Ql a. o'
1010 a'O:::l
:::l 0 :::l 0
~ ~ :::l 9.. ~
(1) -. ~ (1)
A. <g. -0 \:Q Ql
~ ~ g a. g
\1) ~ 0. ~ lE-
6 ~ rg; ~ ~
~ I(; g: Ql ~
'76 <:. 03~.J
n nt .., Q
g ill ~ g
~ ~ ~:::l
Q. ~ ~
~ 0 Ql
...... :::l ~
~ ~
~ ~
~
..."
o
..,
c
?
~
~
~
~
~
~
!:!!.
VI
o
;.....
V1
~
V1
b
o
~
0.
'0
N
g g
~
0.
~
o 0"
iQ ~
~
ill
~
~.
o
:::l
9..
~
(1)
a
~
'E
<<:.
it
..,
"8
"8 :::l
-00 0.
a.
a. ~ ~
I(; c: 0
~ 3 3
s- (1) )>
""0 16@
~ ~ Ql
-' (1)
~ (1)
:::l" :::l
co
?] 0
cr. g
o 3
'2.
OJ ~ 9?
% -' ~
~
r
~
Vol
~
~
~
Vol
~
~
';j
it3
~
~
3.
3
~
;.(
o
1\
c:
~
~
c:
~ ~
~ 0
f'CI 0
~~
c: ~
~
~
.....
Z
"0
S
"0
~
3.
'1\
rn
~
"0 "0
C 0 -g
a ~ ~
~ s ~
c """ :z
~ ~ ~
;\ < rn
o ~
~ i
" rn tD
~ ~ """
.A C -='
~ :z '"
{J) 0 5-
""" -n OJ
:z -n d'.
~ 0 g
c:: ~
g )ll
o C
~
o
-..J
~ g
~
-------
Z"au)
1.0 00 ...... 0'1 lJ1 ..r:>o w N ...... c Cm-t
:J 3:""
Kl
...... D:I""'m
mOU)
"CU)
"'"
OZ
n
-""
::r'-tm
00 00 ~ 00 00 ~ ~ ~ ...... 0 "''''''3:
Cxl Cxl 00 Cxl Cxl 00 00 00 0 a, ~3:m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N mZ
-t
0
,,<
_,,0
...... ...... ;::fICr-
!=l !=' 0 0 !=l 0 !=l !=l 00 \.0 WZC
~ 1.0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'1 -03:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cxl ...... "m
lJ1 lJ1 "
"a -I
" ....
0 3:
\.I
m m
q
Z :::u ~
)> c:
3: Z 0
m 0
Ci) ." C
)> ." ~
r- ....
m Z m
"'" "'CI -I
Z c:
U) -I
C
E c
~
"'"
0 ~
Z
BENTLEY ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, INC.
PROJECT TITLE: Gale Insulation - Boynton Beach, Florida
PROJECT NUMBER: 2000-07 SCALE (1 =_> 0 DATE
BASIN DESIGNATION: 1 MADE BY: BAG 12-Jul-OO
BASIN ANALYSIS (PRE/POST): Post CHECKED BY: MJJ
SUB-BASIN ANALYSIS
1) BASIN I STUDY DATA
PLANIMETERED BASIN AREA (in^2)
0.00
COMPUTED BASIN AREA (Ac)
RAINFALL (inches) P
~
~
DETERMINE BASIN RUNOFFF CURVE NUMBER - CN
SO~k , , , soW ,
,. . . 'PaO@Q
, " .
,.~U$E;,PE~~Vn.P~ NAME '~~qUp c;~. A~i!A
Grass cover (good) A 39 2.74 107.04
lmoervious areas (bldg, pavt, cone) 98 1.51 147.54
* See TR-55, pp 2-7, June 1986 TOTALS 4.25 254.58
I COMPOSITE CN I 59.9
APPENDIX A
SOILS REPORT
93
UNIVERSAL
ENGINEERING SCIENCES
~
~~~Th:~W~~ P
MA& 3 1 2000
Con:;ultam:; In Geo~~chnic;;~1 !:,ngineepng .
Environmental SCiences . Construction Malenals T estm9
7567 Central Industrial Drive. Riviera Beach, FL 33404 .
phone (561) 848-4015 fax (561) 848-4662
BENTLEY ARCHITECTS &
ENGINEERS, INC.
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COV~R SHEET
DATE VVB 0
3/31/00 (;K 0
TO Mik.e JarQck MJ ~
fiT 0
:)3 0
COMPANY Bentley Architects & Engmeers 8.0 []
Fax No (407) 331-4566 .n 0
If" 0
'-.')
FROM Peter Read
OTHER
SUBJECT Gale InsulatIon, Boynton Beach -1f2QD. D 1
Geotechnical Report
UES Project No 67349-001-01
UES Report No 7225
YOU SHOULD RECEIVE 28 PAGElS) INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET IF YOU DO NOT
RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL (561) 848-4015
COMMENTS
Attached is the text, bore[ogs, and test results from the geotechnical study completed last
week for the Gale Insulation project in Boynton Beach Flonda Call me should you have any
questions
Tor
l{ b \
MlVi
LBlZ N\J((Lf~'AL (100)
oe \
(fl\)7PC'0 L \'\1<(3.'0( \Cj
K~ hcrlu..\\)'J o{ <;\JL
\(~ W;Jd ~oJ
v ~Qd({\1I1
lJES Project No 67349-001-01
UES Report No 7225
1 0 JNTRODUCTIO~
1 1 GENERAL
In this report we present the results of tht;! ~LJbslJrface exploration conducted at the proposed
Gale Insulation site loctited ne~r the intersection of Park Ridge Boulevard and High Ridge
Road in Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County Florida. We hawil divided this report into the
following sections
. SCOPE OF SERVIC~S - Defines what we did
. FINDINGS - Describes what we encountered
· RECOMMENDATIONS - Describes what we encourage you to do
· LIMITATIONS - Describes the restnctions inherent In this report
. SUMMARY - Reviews the material In this report
· APPENDICES - Presents support materials referenced in this report
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTrON
We understan<;f you propose to construct a single-story pre-fabricated metal buildmg with
approximately 14,000 square feet of area. The site is located near the southern comer of the
intersection of Park Ridge Boulevard and High Ridge Road in Boynton Beach, Palm Beach
County, Flonda. A general location map of the project area appears in Appendix A Site
Location Map
We received copies of a location map and site plan which indicated the general location and
layout of the proposed structure and paved areas. We used this plan in preparing our
exploration
We have used the information outlined in our signed proposal (UES No 00-065) which
Indicated that column and wall loads do not exceed 50 kips and 10 kips per foot, respectively
Additionally, we were supplied with the information that the structure will be supported on
approximately 4 feet of fill above existing grades
Our recommendations are ba~ed YPQn the above considerations If any of this information is
Incorrect or if you anticipate any changes mform UES so that we may review our
recommendations
Page 1 of 14 Pages
UES Project No 67349-001,,01
UES Report No 7225
2.2 PURPOSE
The purposes of this exploration were
· to explore the general subsurface conditions at the site,
· to interpret and review the subsurface conditions with respect to the proposed
construction, and
. to provide geotechnical engineering recommendatIons for groundwater control,
foundation design, pavement desIgn, and site preparation
ThiS report presents an evaluation of site conditions on the basis of traditIonal geotechnIcal
procedures for site characterization. The recovered samples were not examined, either
visually or analytically, for chemical composition or environmental hazards UES would be
pleased to perform these services, if you desire.
Our exploratton was confined to the zone of soil likely to be stressed by the proposed
construction. Our work did not address the potential for surface expre$$iQn of deep geological
conditions, such as sinkhole development related to karst activity This evaluation requires a
more extensive range of field services than performed in this study We will be pleased to
conduct an investigation to evaluate the probable effect of the regional geology upon the
proposed construction, if you desire
2.3 FIELD EXJ:'lORATION
The subsurface conditions at the sIte were explored with a total of eight soil borings The
borings (designated as 61 through B8) were advanced to depths ranging between 5 ~ and 15
feet each while performing the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) The boring locations were
adjusted slightly when required in the field to allow access to our all-terrain drilling vehicle and
crew The approximate locations of the completed soil borings are presented in Appendix B
Boring location Plan
We performed the SPT according to the procedures of ASTM D.1586, however, we used
continuous sampling to detect slight vanatrons in the soil profile at shallow depths The baSIC
procedure for the SPT is a$ follows. A standard split-barrel sampler is driven into the SOIl by
a 14Q-PQund hammer falling 30 inches The number of blows required to drive the sampler 1
foot, after seating 6 inches, is deSignated the penetration resistance, or N-valuEl, this value is
an index to soil strength and consistency
Page 2 of 14 PagEls
UES Project No 67349-001-01
UES Report No 7225
No site survey was available for OUf field exploration Our drilling crew located the bonngs
based upon estimated distances and relationships to obvious landm~rk~ Consider the
Indicated locations and depths to be approximate. Further the boring locations are based on
the site plan provided
Representative $~mp!es of the salls encountered will be held in our laboratory for your
inspection for 60 days unless we are otherwIse notified
2.4 LABORATORY TESTING
The soil samples recovered from our borings were returned to our laboratory and where a
geotechnical engineer visually examined and reviewed the field descnptlons We selected
representative soil samples for laboratory testing consisting of three Wash No 200 Analynes,
one Corrosion Series Test, one Modified Proctor Test, one Limreock Bearing Ratio (LBR) Test
and one falling head laboratory permeability test.
A.. permeability test was conducted on a sample selected from boring Location 87 at a depth
between approximately 2 ~ to 4 feet below existing grade The permeability was found to be
77 by 10 cenbmetes per second (cm/s) The remaining tests were performed these tests to
aid in claSSIfying the soils and to help to evaluate the general engIneering characteristics of the
site soils See Appenc;lix 6 BQring Logs. Description of Testing Procedures, for further data
and explanations
3.0 FINDINGS
3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS
A. UES representative performed a vIsual site inspection of the subject property to gain a
"hands-on" familiarity With the project area. Based on our this inspection and field exploration,
the site currently appears as a mostly wooded parcel of land with some unimproved trails The
site had a few higher sandy ridges but appeared relatively flat to general overall topography
We examined U S G S topographic quadrangle maps and the USDA Soil Conservation
Service Soil Survey of Palm Beach County for relevant information about the site. A review
of the Palm Beach County Soils Survey indicates the SQils generally found on the site
encompass the Arents and Riv!era Depressional series. According to the Soils Survey under
natural conditions the groundwater table for the Arents series is typically found at depths
below 4 feet while the groundwater table for Riviera Depressional senas usually covers the
surface for 6 months out of the year and IS typically found at depths between 10 to 30 Inches
for most of the remaining year
Page 3 of 14 Pages
lJES Project No 67349-001-01
UES Report No. 7225
3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The boring locations and detailed subsurface ~nditlQns are illustrated in Appendix B Boring
Location Plan and Boring Logs AISQ, see Appendix B Key to Boring Logs for further
explanation of the symbols and placement of data on the Bonng Logs. The soil profiles were
prep~red from field logs after the recovered soil samples were examined by a Geotechnical
Engineer The stratification lines shown on the boring logs represent the approximate
boundaries between soil types and may not depict exact subsurface soil conditions The
actual soil boundaries may be more transitional tt'lafl depicted A generalized profile of the
soils encountered at our boring loeations is presented below In Table I For detailed soil
profiles, please r€rer to the attached boring logs.
TABLE I
GENERALIZED SOIL PROFILE
Depth Encountered
(feet bls) Soil Description
0-6% Various mixtures of light-gray to gray sand [SP] which were
typically underlain by layers of browmsh-gray sand with traces
of silt (SP]
6 ~ - 10 Loose to medium dense to dense, brown to reddish"brown
organically stained sand with varying amounts of silt and
traces of fine roots [SP, SP.SM, SM]
10 - 15.... Loose, light yellowish-brown to gray sand with traces of silt
[SP]
NOTE [ ] denotes Unified Soil Classification System designation
'lt1' indicates strata encountered at boring termination, total thickness
undetermined.
We encountered the groundwater at depths ranging between approximately 11 t~ 11 ~ feet
below existing grades at the time of our exploration.
Notable features within the general soil profile were (a) The presence of loose surficial Soils
in some boring locations; and (b) The organically stained $~nd encountered at varying depths
within the deeper boring locations
Page 4 of 14 Pages
l)ES Project No. 67349-001-01
UES Report No 7225
The loose surficial sands encountered in our boring locations below the proposed building
location and paved areas should be properly prepared before filling the sit~ to design grade
Properly compacting the loose surficial layers will help to ifJ~lJre that post construction
settlements remain within their tolerable limits. PI~~$~ refer to the Site Preparation Procedures
of thiS report for further details AI~(), it should be noted that excavations within the dry
sandy soils may reql,lir~ t~mporarily shoring while working below the existing ground
surfac~. VV~ r~CQmmend that all excavations be Shored in accordance with OSHA
gl,.ljgelines
The layers of brown to reddish-brown organically stained sand with traces of root material were
typically encountered at depths of appfOximately 6 ~ feet below the existing land surface
Based on a Visual examination and the SPT "N"-values, these soils have a relatively low
organic eoneefltration and are suitable for construction However, if any soils are found which
differ from those encountered in our limited number of bonngs or which contain higher
percentages of organic material, our office should be notified immediately for further tests -and
recommendations.
4 0 RfCOMMENDA..~
4 1 GENERAL
The following recommendations are made based upon a review of the attached soil test data,
our understanding of the proposed construction, and experience with similar projects and
subsurface conditions If the structural loadings, building locations, or grading plans change
from those discussed previously, we request the opportunity to review and possibly amend our
recommendations with respect to those changes
Additionally if subsurface condItions are encountered during construction which were not
encountered in the borings, report those conditions immediately to us for observation and
recommendations.
In this s~ction of the report, we present our detailed recommendations for groundwater control,
building foundations pavements, site preparation, and construction related services.
Page 5 of 14 Pages
UES Project No 67349-001-01
UES Report No 7225
4.2 GROUNDWATER CONTROL
The typical wet season groundwater level is c;I~fin~<;l ~s the highest groundwater level sustained
for a period of 2 to 4 weeks during th~ ''wet" season of the year, for existing site conditions, in
a year with av~rag~ nQrmal rainfall amounts Based on historical data, the rainy season in
SQuth FIQrida is between May and September of the year In order to estimate the wet season
water level at the boring locations many factors are examined, including the following
a) measured groundwater level
b) drainage characteristics of existing soil types;
c) season of the year (wet/dry season),
d) curront & histoncal rainfall data (recent and year-ta-date)
e) natural relief pomts (such as lakes, rivers, swamp areas, etc)
f) man-made drainage systems (ditches, canals. etc.),
g) distances to relief points and man-made drainage systems,
h) on-site types of vegetation, and
i) area topography (ground surface elevations)
Groundwater levels were recorded at depths ranging between approximately 11 to 11 Yz feet
BLS at the time of our exploration. Based on the site elevation and considering the factors
listed above, we estimate that the average wet seasonal high groundwater levels at our boring
locations are between 9 to 9 Y2 feet below land surface (BlS) across the site
The estimated seasonal high groundwater levels do not provide any assurance that
groundwater levels will not exceed these estimated levels during any given year In the fl)tl)re
If the rainfall intenSity and duration, or total rainfall quantities, exceed the nQrmaHy anticipated
rainfall quantities, groundwater levels may exceed our seasonal high estimates. We
recommend positive drainag~ be established and maintamed on the site dunng construction
We further recommend permanent measures be constructed to maintain positive drainage from
the site throughout the life of the proJect.
We recommend all foundation and pavement designs incorporate the seasonal high
groundwater conditions.
Page 6 of 14 Pages
UES Proj~ct NQ 67349-001-01
UES Report No 7225
4.3 BUILDING FOUNDATIONS
Based on the encountered soil conditions and structural load~ assumed in this report, the
proposed structures may be supported on c<;>nventional, shallow spread foundations or a
thickened edge monolithic slab $i~eO to exert a maximum net soil bearing pressure of
2,500 pounds per squ~re foot (pst) All foundations should be embedded at least 1 5 feet
below lowest adjacent grade (finished surrounding grade, for example)
Minimum foundation widths of 16 and 24 inches should be maintained for strip and square
footings respectively, even though the maximum allewab/e soil beanng pressure may not be
developed in all cases. We estimate tne foundations will have a minimum factor of safety of
two against bearing capacity failure
For the foundations designed as recommended and the site prepared according to the
recommendations provided In this report, we estimate that settlement of 1 inch or less might
occur A differential settlement of less than % inch should be expected
4 4 PAVEMENTS
4 4 1 GENERAL
We recommend u$ing a flexible pavement section on this project In areas where light autos,
pick-LlP trucks and smaller delivery vehicles will travel Flexible pavements combine the
strength and durability of several layer components to produce an appropriate and oost-
effective combination of available materials
In the dumpster pad areas and for any tractor trailer delivery areas, we recommend using rigid
concrete pavement made with Type 1 Portland Cement
4.4.2 RIGID (CONCRETE) PAVEMENTS
We recommend using rigid pavement for durability, strength and longer life in the heavy-duty
traffic areas and for the dumpster pads. Concrete pavement is a ngld pavement resulting in
much lighter load transfer to subgrade soils than flexible (asphalt) pavement. Rrgid pavement
may be constructed of unrelnforced Portland cement concrete provif,1in9 a mInimum 28-day
compressive strength of 4,000 psi. In addition, the concrete shQuld provide a minimum 28-day
flexural strength (modulus of rupture) of 600 psi based on the 3rd point loading of concrete
beam samples. Portland cement should be Type I Pavement thickness should be 7 inches
Page 7 of 14 Pages
liES Project No 67349-001-01
UES Report No. 7225
We recommend that subgrade materials for concrete pavements be compacted in plac~
according to the requirements In the "Site Preparation" subsection of thiS report, Pavement
sections should be constructed only over stable and smooth subgr(3<;l~$, Rutting of subgrades
from concrete trucks and other traffic should be r~gair~d prior to placement of concrete.
The subgrade should be thoroughly wetted immediately pnor to concrete placement to
minimi~e abSQrption of moisture from the concrete during curing
Control jOints for crack control should be closely spaced, between 8 to 12 feet apart. Control
joints Should be provIded in a uniform square or rectangular pattern. The joints should be
submitted for review and approved prior to construction. Control joints should be sawed as
soon as the concrete can withstand traffic, and concrete surface and aggregate raveling can
be prevented
One of the most critical influences on the pavement performance In South Flonda is the
relationship between the pavement subgrade and the seasonal high groundwater level. We
recommend that the seasonal high groundwater and the bottom of the rigid pavement be
separated by at least 12 inches
44 3 lAYER COMPONENTS
For prelimin~ry pavement designs we recommend using a three layer pavement section
consisting of stabilized subgrade base course, and surface course placed on top of existing
subgrade or a compacted embankment.
Because traffic loadings am commonly unavailable, we have generalized OUf pavement design
into groups The group descnptions and the recommended component thicknesses are
presented in Table 2: Pavement Comj:}onent Recommendations
The structural numbers in Table 2 are based on a structural number analysis with the stated
estimated daily traffic volume for a 15-year placement design life For loading conditions
greater than those presented in Table 2, we recommend that you have a complete pavement
design performed based on projected traffic data
Page 8 of 14 Pages
UES Project No 67349-001-01
UES Report No 7225
TABLE 2 PAVEMENT COMPONENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Com onent Thickness
Structural Stabilized 821ge Surface
Traffic Grou Number Sub rade Course Course
Parkin 2.2 10 6 1.5
3.1 1 2.0
Parking lots-light dUty.
auto parkmg areas, ever eighty cars, light panel and piCKUP
trucks, average gross weight of 4 000 pounds
Parking lots-heavy duty.
site entrances and dnv~ways, twenty trucks or less per day'
average grQ$$ vehicle weight of 25,000 pounds
1.4.4 STABILIZED SUBGRADE
We recommend that subgrade materials be compacted in place according to the requirements
in the "Site Preparation" section of this report.
The in-situ soils should be stabilized properly with either limeroek, clayey soils, or other
equivalent materials and compacted in place according to the requirements in the "SIte
Preparation" section of this report. Further stabilize the subgrade matenals to a minimum
Limerock Beanng Ratio (LBR) of 40 percent as specified by Flonda Department of
Transportation (FOOT) requirements for Type B or Type C Stabilized Subgrade
The stabilized subgrade can be imported material Of a blend of on-site soils and Imported
materials. If a blend is proposed we recommend that the contractor perform a mIx design to
find the optimum mix proportions
4-4.5 BASE; r;OURSE
We re.commend the base course be either lime rock or asphaltic concrete.
Llmerock should have a minimum LBR of 100 percent and should be mined from an FOOT
approved source. Place limerock in maximum 6-inch lifts and compact eaeh lift to a minimum
density of 98 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (MSHTO T -180).
Page 9 of 14 Pages
UES Project No 67349-001-01
UES Report No. 7225
The base course can also be an asphaltic concrete material (FDOT specified ABC-3 with t;I.
minimum Marshall Stability of 1,000 pounds). Perform compliance testing for either Iimerock
or asphaltic concrete at a frequency of one test per 10,000 sql)~re f~~t, or at a minimum of two
test locations whichever is greater
4.4.6 SUBFACE COURSE
In light duty areas where there is occasional truck traffic, but primarily passenger cars, we
recommend uSing an asphaltic concrete ~DOT Type 8-111 which has a stability of
1,200 pound~
In heavy duty areas, where truck traffic is predominant, we recommend using as asphaltic
concrete, FDOT Type S-III or 5-1, whIch has a minimum stability of 1,500 pounds
Asphaltic concrete mixes should be a current FDOT approved design of the materials actually
used Test samples of the materials delivered to the project to verify that the aggregate
gradation and asphalt content satisfies the mix design requirements. Compact the asphalt to
a minimum of 95 percent of the Marshall deSign density
After placement and field compaction, core the we~ring surface to evaluate material thickness
and to perform laboratory densities. Obtain cores at frequencies of at least one core per
3,000 square feet of placed pavement or a minimum of two cores per day's production.
In parking lots, for extended life expectancy of the surface course. we recommend applying a
coal tar emulsion sealer at least six months after placement of the surface course The seal
coat will help to patch cracks and voids, and protect the surface from damaging ultraviolet light
and automobile liquid spillage. Please note that applying the seal coat prior to SIX months after
placement may hinder the "curing of the surface course leading to its early deterioration.
44 7 EFFECTS OF GRQUNDWATFR
One of the most critical influences on the pavement performance in South Florida is the
relationship between the pavement subgrade and the seasonal high groundwater level
Many roadways and parking areas have been destroyed as ~. result of deterioration of the base
and the base/surface course bond. Regardless of the type of base selected, we recommend
that the seasonpl high groundwater and the bottom of the base course be separ.3ted by at least
18 Inches
Page 10 of 14 Pages
lJES Project No 67349-001-01
UES Report No. 7225
4.4_8 CURBING
We recommend that curbing around the landscaped sections adjacent to th~ p~rl<ing lots and
dnveways be constructed with full-depth curb sections V~ing extruded curb sections which
Ire directly on top of the final asph~lt level, Qr eliminating the curbing entirely, can allow
migration of irrigation w<:lter from the landscape areas to the mterface between the asphalt and
the ba$e Thi~ migration often causes separation of the wearing surface from the base and
~lJbsequent rippling and pavement deterioration
4.49 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC
Light duty roadways and Inc{)mplete pavement sections will not perform satisfactorily under
construction traffie loadiM9S We recommend that construction traffic (construction equipment,
concrete trucks, sod trucks, garbage trucks, moving vans, dump trucks, etc.) be re-routed away
from these roadways or that the pavement section be designed for these loadings.
4.5 SITE PRE~ARATION
We recommend only normal, good practice site preparation procedures. ThesQ procedures
Include stripping the site of vegetation demolishing any eXisting structures and pavement
sections, "demucking of organic soils where encountered, proof-rolling and proof-compacting
the subgrade, and filling to grade with engineered fill A more detailed synopsis of this work
is as follows
1 If required, perform remedial dewatGring prior to any earthwork operations.
2. Stnp the proposed construction limits of all grass roots, tOl)soil. pavement, old building
foundations, construction debris and other deletenous materials within and 10 feet
beyond the perimeter of the proposed building and In all paved areas. Expect c1eanng
and grubbrng to depths of 8 IOches Deeper clearing and grubbing depths may be
encountered In areas where major root systems or Isolated pockets of organic soils are
encountered
3 ~roof-roll the subgrade with a heaVily loaded, rubber-tired vehide under the observation
of a UES geotechnical engineer or his representative. Proof-rolling will help locate any
zones of especially loose or soft soils not encountered in the limited number of soil
borings Then undercut, or otherwise treat these zones as recommended by the
engineer
4 Proof-compact the subgrade in remalnmg areas by a medium weight vibratory roller (a
10-ton roller, for example) until you obtain a minimum density of 95 percent of the
modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM 0-1557) to a depth of 2 feet below the
base of the foundations in the building limits and to a depth of 1 foot below the bottom
of the base course in the pavement areas
Page 11 of 14 Pages
UES Project No 67349-001-01
UES Report No. 7225
5 Test the subgrade for compaction at a frequency of not less than one test per
2,500 square feet per foot of depth improvement in the building area. In p<:ived ~reas.
perform compliance tests on the stabilized subgrade fQr full depth ~t ~ frequency Qf one
test per 10,000 square feet, or at a minimvm of two test locations. whichever is greater
6 PI~~ fill mQteri~1, as reqUIred The fill should consist of "clean," fine sand With less
than 5 percent soil fines You may use fill materials WIth soil fines between 5 and
1 0 percent. but stnct moisture control may be required. Place fill in uniform 10- to 12-
lOch loose lifts and compact each lift to a minimum density of 95 pereent of the modified
Proctor maximum dry density
7 Perform compliance tests within the fill at a frequency of not less than one test per
2,500 square feet per lift in the building areas, or at a minimum of two test locations,
whichever is greater In paved areas, perform compliance tests at a frequency of not
less than one test per 10,000 square feet per lift, or at a mimmum of three test locations,
whichever is greater
8. Test all footing cuts for compaction to a depth of 2 feet. If organic soils are encountered
during the footing excavation, excavate and replace them with fill material. Additionally
we recommend you test one out of every foyr column footings. and one test per every
100 lineal feet of wall footing
Using vibratory compaction equipment at thIS site may disturb any nearby adjacent structures.
We recommend you monitor nearby structures before and during proof-compaction If
disturbance IS noted, halt vibratory compaction and inform UES immediately We will review
the compaction procedures and evaluate if the compactive effort results in a satisfactory
subgrade, complying with our onginal design assumptions
4 6 CONSTRUCTION RELATED SERVICES
We recommend the owner retain UE:S to perform construction materials tests and observatrons
on this project. Field tests and observations could include items such as verification of
foundation and pavement subgrades by monitoring -de-mucking", proof-rolling operations and
performing quality assurance tests on the placement of compacted structural fill and pavement
courses.
The geotechnical engineering deSign <;toes not end with the advertisement of the construction
documents. The design is an on-going process throughout construction Because of our
familiarity with the site conditions and the intent of the engineering deSign, we are most
qualified to address problems that might arise during construction in a timely and cost-effective
manner
Page 12 of 14 Pages
lJES Project No 67349-001-01
UES Report No__ 7225
50 LIMITATIONS
Durin9 the early stages of most construction projects, geotechni<;<31 i~sl!es not addressed in this
report may arise Because of the natur~llimitat!ons inherent in working with the subsurface,
it is not possible for a geQtt?c;hni~1 engineer to predict and address all possible problems. An
Associ~tiQn of Engineering Firms Practicing in the Geosciences (AS FE) publicatton, 'Important
Information About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report" appears in Appendix C and will help
explain the nature of geotechnical issues.
Further we present documents in Appendix C Constraints and Restrictions to bring to your
attention the potential concerns and the b3Sic limitations of a typical geotechnical report
6.0 SUMMARY
In summary, we understand you propose to construet a single-story pre-fabricated meta!
building with approximately 14,000 square feet of area along with the associated parking and
dnves We have performed field and laboratory explorations to provide geotechnical
engineering recommendations for foundation deSign, pavement design, and site preparation.
The soils encountered generally con$isted of vanous mixtures of gray to light brownish-gray
sand underlain by layers of brownish-gray sand to a depth of approximately 6 ~ feet below the
existing land surface (bls) These layers were typically underlain by brown to reddish-brown
organically stained sand to depths of approximately 10 feet bls. Layers of light yellowish-
brown to gray sand were then encountered to the maximum explored depth of 15 feet bls.
Groundwater was encountered at depths ranging between approximately 11 and 11 ~ feet
below the existing land surface at the time of exploration Our best estimate for the average
wet seasonal high groundwater table is between 9 and Q ~ feet below the eXIsting ground
surface at the boring locations.
For site prepared as recommended, the proposed structure may be supported on conventional
shallow spread foundations with allowable soil bearing pressures of 2,500 psf
Pavements should be designed as a function of the antrclpatE;!d traffic loadings We
recommend uSing a three-layer flexible pavement section In Iight-duty and parkIng areas and
a rigid pavement in all heavy traffic areas and dumpster pad locations All pavement deSigns
should incorporate the effects of groundwater irrigated landscape areas, and construction
traffic.
Page 13 of 14 Pages
lJE$ PrOject NQ 67349-001-01
UES Report No 7225
We recommend normal, good practice site preparation procedures to prepare the subgrade
to support the structures and pavements
We hope this report meets your n~~c;I~ c;lnd dis<;l)$ses the problems associated with the
prop9$ed development We would be pleased to meet with you and discuss any geotechnical
engineering aspects of the project.
Page 14 of 14 Pages
,
N
Il''''''.
';1'
a
).. j 17 :( i
,..
MO TOIIOL^
CO'If'
LttJ
<#
\
~
{/)
VI
III
a:
l:>
Z
o
u
lr.~',
1'11'" r"
"......~. j;
OlD rOyt.1TQN III & W'I
.'
?O"HTi)11
~8f1( n'I___'
u-:: .
. "
~..r
- 'r--~
,
'/
~~-'l
iftl
UNIVERSAL
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION SERVICES
PROPOSED GALE INSULATION
PARK RIDGE; BOULEVARD & HIGH RIDGE ROAD
BOYNTON BEACH, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
- -------" ---- - --.
SITE LOCATION MAP
I Nt,!NI I.lP'll
DRAWN By' KGl'"
OATE:3n.7100
CHECKED BV' PGR
DATE: 3/27/00
f1AGIi NO: A-I
SCJ\LE_ N.T.S
PROJECT NO: 61349-001-0' REPORT NO: 7225
PARK RIDGE BOL LEVARD
i
N
20" -f,
0'
,
I
I
I
I
-L}'
~
j.,.
\~
t
\~
\
0B~ \
\
.
\
~B-7 In
II '
, ,
I '
~ oll"ltU. J,UI 51'. l
.vA l'AIIIUlUlt ~ u~ lor.
y. v/) m~.". g. g
ti~~B-4 I I,!, i:
d r
\ I Ii
I /f''---------------'; I
I _.---1 ~l2L~.'
l___~--- \ ..:~~-~-~-~
a 1!.l. ~ :.0 t 13:..1- 9 -.I ~ S4 J fn1lr
b
!!!
BOYNTON CANAL
r. ".-. ~.'
i~ .~.'~'
~J../':I
~
UNIVERSAL
t r~C:INI I r.:ftJt
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION SERVICES
PROPOSED GALE INSULATION
PARK RIDGE BOULEVARD & HIGH RIDGE ROAD
BOYNTON BEACH, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
.- - - -----.--
BORING LOCATION PLAN
----.--.. .----
DRAWN ev KGF OP, TE. ~J:mQQ C~~C~!;O 13v' rGR OA.TE: 3/Z7/00
.-
SCALIi. !l.T.S
PROJIOCT NO' 6134~Ol"()1 JilE~ORT NO: 7125
PAGE ~O: 5-'
m
PROJECT
CLIENT
LOCATION:
REMARKS.
-" PROJECT NO 67349-001-01
UNIVr ;AL ~NGIN~~RING SCI~NCE
BORING LOG REPORT NO 7225
PAGE. B-2.
G8o~echnic.1 Explor.tion Service~ Proposed Gale Insulation
ParI( Ridge Boulevard & HiQh Ridge Road
Boynton Besch Florida
BORING DESIGNATION: 81
SECTION: TOWNSHIP'
G~le Jnc1vstries
G.S. ELEVATION (ft):
WATER TABLE (ftl' ".5
DATE OF READING. 3116/00
DATE STARTEO'
OATE FINISHEO'
DRILLED BY
SHEET 1 of 1
RANGE:
311 6/00
3116/00
EST WSw T (ftl 9.5
TYPE OF SAMPLING. SPT
UES (Rivia".)
DESCRIPTlON
DEPTH
CFTJ
s
~ BLOWS N " ~
P PER 6- (BLOWS/ W T B
L INCREMEN'f FT.) 0
E L
(Cjh)
a
5
10
~ I
15tj
<"
->
co
I
\ 'j
/1
;;1 ~-~
3-3-3
'1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 6
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I.
I
6
.I.
7
13
I
I
12_
13\. r:
I~
I
I
i
'l~
L:>
,
,\,
3-3-3
, /
X
:".
-.1
3.3.4
J'
I.
1/
I 5-5-8
J\
Ri\.,
\ /\
VI
!~
14- i 6-9
.. ~~}-6
1
-1
I A TTERBERG
LIMITS
LL PI
Loose, light gray sand with traces of silt rSP)
. Loo.se.light b1.0"llnish. 9~av 58f).d.rSfJ.
. .1
I'
,: j I
1: :.1
1 I
I ' I
. I.!
I '
. I
I.
Medium dense. brown to reddish brown
organically stained sand with varying
amOUnlS of silt (SP SP SM)
1 Medium dense .0 loose. light yellowish
,. brown-samj'vvith..tracss'oh;;tr IS?}
SPT Soil Boring Terminated at 15 feet
I
I
i-
t
i
I
I
K
IFT./
eAYI
ORG.
CONT
('to)
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
1
1
I
1...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
m
-- PROJECT NO. 67349-001-01
UNIVf ;AL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
BORING LOG REPORT NO 7225
P,AG~' ~~
""OJECT
GeotQc"";c~1 E"l)IorlP~;on 5e<v.ces P'oDoseo Osle Insulstlon
Psrk RldQe Boulevsrd & High Ridge Rosd
Boynton Baach. Florida
BORING DESIGNATION: B2
SECTION: TOWNSHIP'
SHEET 1 of 1
RANGE:
C\.IENT
LOCATION
REMARKS.
G31e Inc:lvS1'ies
G.S. ELEVATION 1ft).
WATER TABLE [nl 11 0
DATE STARTED'
DATE FINISHED'
3116100
3:'6rOO
DATE OF READING, 3/1 6iOO DRILLED BY
UES IRiv1er.'
EST W S.W Tift) 9
TYPE OF SAMPLING: 3PT
o
BLOWS
PER 6-
INCREMENT
N
(BLOWSi W T
FT.)
Y
M
B
()
L
DESCRIPTION
-200
C%l
MC
f%)
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
DEPTH
(Fi )
lL PI I
K
1FT
DAY}
ORG.
CONT
(~i
Very loose. light grey send with ,reces-6Ts-j-l-t
(SP]
I'
i
~ ' 1 1 2 Very loose. brown sand with traces of roots
IS!> Sf> SM]
Loose lient erev send with traces of ,,;It (SPj
~ 3-2 3 5
" / I
5 --1~\ \:.. .j \
3-4 3 7 I I
I I
I
..r I .', 1 I
I'I Medium dense ~o dense. dark brown to t
I II' . reddish brown organically stained sand with I
-{.-': 4-" , 7 I 28 I I I ! I varying llmoun~ of silt ISP 5P SM, 5M) 6 I
I I, r 1 I
I II .I I
1 I '..1 I I
! 1'9-22 221 I : I
I : I
44 1
I 1 '1 1
, , I \>7 .1 1
, ' ;1 I
I 1--0.'_ .more orangish brown in color
I I
.1.. l'l I j. .t
10 ' 1 1 Z 11 ?}. i
',''1' [' I
I I r'l I 1
-y- . J I I I
J Loose, light yellowish brown sand wit" 1
I I
I tr3ces of silt (SP) I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I
-1 I I I
I I I I
I
I \
i
I I I
I I
4 5-4 9 L. I. I
15 .1.. .t
5PT Soil Boring Terminated at 15 feet I I I
I !
I I I
I I i
I
I I I !
I I !
I ,
I I I
I \ I I
i 1
I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I i I
1
..> I
~
al
m
- PI\OJECT NO.. 67349-001-01
UNIVE 'AL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
REPORT NO 7225
BORING LOG
PA,GE: 6-4
PROJECT
Geot~ch"iCCJI Exp1orilti0f1 SQlViCGS Pro Dosed G~Ic;: insul9tion
Pari( Rldg8 Boulevard & High Ridg8 Rosd
BOynlO" 8each. F1or;da
BORiNG DESIGNATION: B3
SECTION: TOWNSHIp.
SHEEI 1 of 1
RANGE:
CLIENT
LOCATION'
REMARKS.
Gala Indu8uiu
G.S. ELEVATION [fn'
WATER TABLE tlll 11 0
DATE OF READING. 3'16iOO
EST W S.W T (ft). 9
DATE STARTED'
DATE FIIIlISHED'
DRILLED BY
3116100
3/1 6/00
TYPE OF SAMPLING. SPT
UES IRivier.'
BLOWS N y
DEPTH M
1FT 1 PER 6- (8LOWSI W T B
INCREMENT FT 0
l
0
.. ,
i 1 222 4
-:1
,
223 5
DESCRIPTION
-200
(~ol
i\f,C
(%!
lc'-os'e', Ij'g'h', g'r~y sand wi'!'f, (races of s'n'! [S'P)
Loose brownish gray sand With traces of silt
ISP]
I I.
5-L "
~" 2 3-3 6 I
. .
'1 I
. .
-4
1/ I I
i' 'I 3 3.5 8
~..- -
\ i! I
i
1 i I '1" :I Medium dense ,0 loose reddish to orangish
8 I brown sand with varying amounts of silt (SP
5-7-8 15 I~ I [I SPSMJ
. . L,
~ I _more light orang ish brown ,n color
-. \.l
10 6-5-<1. 9 -'
I
I I Loose, light yellowish brow~ sand wi~!'1
I
I ~. traces of silt [SPJ
I
I I
I I I
!
1, 1 I
I
I
I
-l I 1
I I
2 2-3 5
15 I I SPT Soil Bo(,ng Terminated at 15 teet
I
I
I
I
I I
I i
I I
I I
I I
I
I
M
-'
'"
I A TTERBERG
LIMITS
K
rFT.i
DAYl
ORG.
CONT
1%1
Ll PI
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I I
I I
\......1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
!
I
I
I....
,
I
i
i
I
.1
I
I
1
1
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
-- PFlOJECT NO. 67349-001-01
UNIVf 'AL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
REPORT NO.. 7225
BORING LOG
PAGE: 8-5
::>ROJECT
GQotechnic.1 ExDlor~tion Se:rvlces Proposed G~Je lnsut.tior'l
P8r~ Ridge Boule',ard & High Ridge Road
Bovnton Beach. Florida
60RING DESIGNATION B4
SECTION: TOWNSHIP'
CLIENT
Gale l"dv31"~~
LOCATION'
'lEMARKS
DEPTH
(F'I'.!
, ,
iAI N
~ PER 6" I'SLOWSI W T
L INC"EMENT n "
E
o
I'
I
I I
1; ,I
J1
JJ
'I
1
, I
5 J
t, ,
1 :\
I'
~;n
3-2 '3
3-3,;1
~-4-3
<1-7-8
M
-.J
lD
I.
~'
-Hi
I' )-4-3
10 ' I'
I I
1 i
J I
, I
W
"\
1', ,
I! 3-33
lS~'--~\.'
I I
I I
It
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
i I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
!?
5
...,
7
I
I
I
I
I " I:
1-'- .
I II
I I I
I~
I
I
i
i
I
15
I
I
1
I
I
I
I 6
I.
I
I
I
I
1
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
G S. ELEV A nON 1ft!
WATER TABLE (ftl 11 0
DATE STARTED'
DATE I=INISHED'
SHEET 1 of 1
RA.NGE'
3/16'00
311 6/00
EST W S,W T (ft), 9
DA.TE OF' READING: 3116100 DRILLED BY
UES IRi\rieral
DESCRIPTION
li;ose, i;'g'ht g'riJ'y s'iJnd wi'th t'<lces of sl'lt IS'P)
Loose, brownish gray Slmd with vaces of sil,
ISP)
Medium dense ,0 loose. reddish 1:0 orang,sh
brown sand wi,h varying amoums of sil, ISP
SP SM)
.more ligh, orangish brown ,n color
loose. light yellowish brown sand wi,h
tr8Ces of sil, {SPJ
SPT Soil Boriog Termioa,ed at 15 feet
TYPE OF SAMPLING: SPT
200
(~~)
I
I
I
I
f'
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
A.TTER6ERG
I LIMITS
I LL PI
I(
1FT
DAY}
ORG
CONT
{~!
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
,
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
I
I
i
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
, I
1 1
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I :
I I
I
1
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
I
1
,
m
UNIVE -- ~AL ENGINEERING SCIENCE PROJECT NO. 67349-001-01
BORING LOG REPORT NO. 7225
PAGI;. ~-6
PROJECT
GeotCChn,c~1 Exolor~tIO" Servkes Proposed Ga-Ie Insulation
Park Ridge BO\II~ lard & High Ridge Road
Boynton Beacn ~Ior;da
CLIElIIT Gale 1"dUS1"e~
BORING DESIGNATION 85
SECTION TOWNSHIP'
SHEET 1 of 1
RANGE.
...OCATION:
G S. ELEVATlQN If"!l:
WATER ToO.BLE (It] NE
!;lATE ~ARTI;Q'
DATE FINISHED-
3fll?iOO
3/16/00
REMARKS
DATE OF !'lEADING: 3i16100 DRILLED flY
UES IRlvlera)
EST \'\I.S W Tift!
TYPE OF SAMPLING. SPT
o
y
I\f,
e
o
L
CESCRIPTlON
200
COiO!
I ATTERBERG I I( ORG.
MC LIMITS I
(%J (FT ! CONT
DAY) :~t
LL pi
DEPTI-l
(FT.l
Loo::e. mixed gray sand with trllces of silt
ISPJ
i ~;I
-1' I
[~
5
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1.
123
"
I
Loose. I1ght gray sand with traces of sitt [SP]
).
/\
~-!,)-4
11
.-.JX
:>j,'
I
I
I
SPT Soil Boring Terminated at 5-' '2 feet
I
I'"
I
I
I
3-3-4
7
i
,
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
1
I
I
i
I
I
j
I
I
i
:->
oJ
aJ
m
UNIVE -~ AL ENGINEERING SCIENCE PROJECT NO.. 67349-001-01
BORING LOG REPORT NO 7225
PA(i!;; 1!-7
~..OJECT
Gllotechnical Exp1or:mon Services Proposed Gale Insulation
P~t1.. Ridge 5ovlev~(d & H;gh Ridge R03d
Boynton Bea:;h. Florioa
BORING OESIGNATION, B6
SECTION TOWNSHIP'
SHEET 1 of 1
RANGE.
CliENT
~OCATION:
REMARKS:
Gale IndUS1"e~
G S ELEVATION lItl
DATE STARTED'
3/16/00
3/16/00
WATER TABLE (n). NE OATE FINISHEO'
DATE OF READING. 3/16/00 DRIUED BY
UES {R;vi~al
EST W S~w T tftl.
TYPE OF SAMPlH~G. SPT
OESCRIPl'lON
Me
(%1
ATTERBERG I
LIMITS
I~ \ y
o fI"TH BLOWS I !, M
(FT. I PER 6" IIBLO\VSI W T 8
I~ INCREMENT FT ) 0
!: L
0
I
I
{I 2 , 3
H 4
1\/1
, j , 2 , 3
-j
. I
5 I
~I 222 4
I I
i
1
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I I
I
1 1
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
I (
I
1
I
I I
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
J I
I I
I I
\
I
1
0',
-'
dl
lL PI
K
(FT./
DAY)
ORG.
CONT
(<<;0)
-Lb-os'e to very 'I 00 s-e, ligiit~ gray sanc{ with
traees of sill (SPJ
Very loose. oranglsh brOwn sand WIth traces
Of Sil, [SPI
Loose. brown sand WIth varyIng i1mounlS nf
silt [SP SP SM]
SPT Soil Boring Termina1ed a' 5-1!2 fee,
I
I
I
I
I ~
I
I
I
j
i
I
I
I
I
1
l
I
m
- PROJECT NO 67349-001-01
UNIVr ~AL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
BORING LOG REPORT NO 7225
PAGE, a-e
;>ROJECT
Geotechnical ExploratIon ServIces p'ooo.eel Gale Insulation
Park Ridge Boulevard & HIgh Ridge Road
Boynton BeaCh F1o"da
BORING DESIGNA nOtJ: B 1
SECTlO~J' TOWNSHIP'
SHEET 1 of 1
RANGE:
CLIENT
LOCATION:
REMARKS.
G~I,; lndysv;e"~
G.S. ELEVAT!ON !f~!
WATER TABLE (ft) NE
DATE STARTED'
DATE FINISHED'
3/16iOO
3/16100
DATE OF READING_ 3/16;00 DRILLED BY
UES IR;v;eraJ
EST W SoW T titr
TYPE OF SAMPlING_ SPT
~ BLOWS I ~J I I ~ I I I ATTERBERG i i
i K I QRG_
DEPTH M PER 6'- iBlOWS! W T ~' I DESCRIPTION I ZOO MC LIMITS i !FT I I CONT
[lOT) P INCREMENT FT 0 I I I.:(-.j I f o4?~ !
L I I ()AYI I i'lb,
E L I I lL PI I I
O- II I i
L6"6"s"e", hght gray sar,d with ira-CBS ,;f '-;-I~ (SPJ I I I I
I
I I I
I I I I
; I I I I I
, I
I I
I I I I I I
222 I I I !
~ I I
.. I I
i, ; I I I
Loose, orangish brown sand WIth vacss of I
I I I I i t
I sil1 ISP) I
223 I 5 I
-;-- - I I I I i
j'. ; I I I I I I I
I I I I I 1 I
I I I I- I I I
5 -Ii -I I ['- .more 'ye116Wislf brown iiiub610r l. I j
v . 2 3-3 I 6 i I I I I
r I I I I
! SPT Soil Borin!;! Terminated at 5-1/2 feet I I I ,
I I
I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I
I I
I I !
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I
I I I ! I I
I i I I I
, I I I
I i i I I I I
I I I I I
i I i I
I I I I I I
I I I I ! I
I ! I I I r I !
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I !
I I I I I
I I i I i
i I I i
I I I I I
I 1 I I I I ! I
! I I
I i I I I
I I I I I !
I I I I I I I
I I I ;
I I I I i I
I I I I I I
I I
I I , I I
I I
I I
I I I !
I I
I I I
I I I i
I I
I I I
I
I I
I I I I
I I I
I
I I I i i
I , I I I I I
I I I I
i I I I I I
I 1 I I I i
I I I I ! I I
I I I !
I ) I i
i I i
n ~--- " - "-
..,
-'
cO
m
- PROJECT NO 67349.001-01
UNIVf 'AL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
BORING LOG RepORT NO 7225
PAGE. 8-9
?ROJECT
Geotechnical EXpIO(8t'On ServicGs PrOPOSGd Gale Insulatio"
P8rl< ";d96 Buulavard &. High Ridge RQ~d
BeY'''e~ Be~c~. ~Ior.d~
BORING DESIGNATlor4: 88
SECTION' TOWNSHIP'
SHEET 1 of 1
RANGE.
CUENT
LOCATION:
REMARKS.
G<,I~ Indv~trie~
G S. ELEVATIO~! (fu
DATE STARTED-
3/16/00
3;16/00
WATER TABLE Cfti- NE DATE FINIS~EO'
DATE OF' READING. 3j1 S!OO DRILLED BY
UES rRiv;crol
EST W.S.W TIft)
TYPE OF SAMPLING. SPT
0
J
1\
~, .1 1 23 5
I~
-i./
J/' 3.3.2 5
I. .
, ,
I
I
!;-{ 2 3-3 6
t
r
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
i
I
i
I
I
!
i
I 1
I I
I \
I
I
I 1
I I
1
I I
I
I
I I
'"'
-' 1
.a:
DESCRIPTION
-200
(~.ol
Me
t%d
I A TTERBERG
I LIMITS
LL PI I
I(
iFT
BAY)
ORG.
CONT
(70;
LOOGB I,ght gray sar1d wIth trac8S of silt CS"Pl
'1
I
I
I
I
II
L I
\. ]
W
I 1
II
I' 1
I
loose brownish gray sand with traces Of silt
(SP)
I
I
I
t.
SPT Soil 80ring Terminated IH 5-1 '2 fl?et
Ea ~~~~~rs~~~~
SYMBOLS
~ of BIaM ~ . 140-11 W-'eht
F__1ng ao In. fWqw.d., on.
s.ndard 8poan One Fvot
WOA Weight of Drill Rods
6 Thin-W8Il Sn.!by Tube Undisturbed
Sampler U4~
9O'lEr Percent Cor. lWcovery from Rock
FWe. Cct.Orllllng Operations
Sample T &ken at this l..-I
Sample Not T Ilk." 1I11h1s l..aveI
Chenge in Soil Strata
Free Ground WatM l.eYal
SeesonaJ High GrQYod Water LewI
RELATIVE DENSITY
(sand-slit)
Very Loose - Less Than 4 Blows/Ft.
Loose - 4 - 10 Blow&/Ft.
Medium - 10 to 30 8JowslA.
Dense - 30 to 50 Blows/Ft.
Very Dense. More Than 50 Blows/Ft.
CONSISTENCY
(Clay)
Very Soft . Less Than 2 Blows/Ft.
Soft. 2 to 4 Blows/Ft.
Medium - 4 to B Blows/Ft.
Stiff - 8 to 1 S BlowslFt.
Very Stiff - 1S to 30 Blows/A.
Hard. More Than 30 Blews/Ft.
I KEY TO BORING lOGS I
UNIFIED CLASSifiCATION SYSTEM
0RQUIt
J4A.IQft DIVISION' .YMDOUl TYPICAL ~ElII
'11 !i GW WeI~ grawl. ..ncI gr-..&nd
1 mOd.lIQSII. Dnle 01 no f1nM:
i I i GP Peony gtaded 8.....01. ancl Qr_ard
a~ rnhd.urea. Itftl. 01 no llnee
iilj ~ .. GM Sill)' g_. grOWl-sand..1k "'lXluree
~lj ii~ GC Clayey 9-. ~raY.""and-day
~i mbnlMM
~ j tJW W.~radao.8IldO ard g........lI)' ..nd..
~S ~j IIttto or no flnos
~j i't: SP Poorly gradcld s..ncla and aravall)'
1 i~ ...,.,.. on.. or no_
j j I al~; s.e Slll)'aands.oet><H1n"'_
! ~ -
SO Cleyey sands. MncI<ley "'bI\.,.
ML lnort;anc: .1Ila. -r _ "nd5. roa<
~ 110..<. tlI1lt or ~ Iin>_
i d)J Q~ ""'<genic ca)'. oIlcw 10 mC>dll6ll
I!~ 5>laollQly.9'-" day.. .and}' days;.
a~ ~ , .1lI)'~._d..,.,.
11 ~ 01. O'llenlo sllu; and organlC.lIly days "'"
-~
III t.lH If'\Orgat'l1cellll. mlCaCll:lIC:n4 01
~I' dla1cmaaloua fine sande Ct siIlr.. ~
~i .lIIs
Is il! ~ l!'Ofllanlcdeyt ()( n'l;n plas!Idly. fA'
l ~ t CIa,..
OH ~ ~ 01 meakMn 10 hi9/>
p/aolldly
HIgNV Oroanlo Soli. PT ~ _ _ olhrot highly orga~1C
.000s
_on.. _ -'"II" 5-In. (1~-
PLASTICITY CHART
10
110
[
R 40
)(
I :
10
,
..
o
10 1. 20 30 40 50 80 70 80 eo 100 110
UQUD IMI1' IUJ
E:l3
UNIVERSAL
ENGINEERING SCIENCES
Client No 67349-001-01
Consultants m. GeotechnIcal Engmeering .
Environmental Sciences. ConstructIOn Matenals Testing
J567 Centrallndustnal Drive. Riviera Beach I=L 33404 .
I3hone (561) 848-4015 fax (561) 848-4662
Report No N!A
Data. March 27 2000
Client-
Project.
Date T Qsted
LocatIOn
CORROSION PARAMETERS
Gale Industries
C/o Masco Corporation
21001 Van Born
Taylor, MI 48180
Gale Insulation
March 24, 2000
B-2, sample from 0 to 1 foot below ground surface
TEST RESUl IS
TJSS;flYPE .IleSULTS
RESISTIVITY 22,000 ohm-em
CHLORIDE, Cl 45 ppm
SULFA TE, SQ.:. 5 ppm
pH 3 32
AntiCipated Corrosion ActlVIW Mild
EI3
UNIVERSAL
ENGINEERING SCIENCES
Cliem No 67349-001-01
Report No N/A
Consultants in. Geotechnical E::ngineering -Environmental Sciences.
Construction Materiels festlng . 7567 Central Industrial Drive.
Rivi~r~ ~l!~"h, Fl. 33404 . (407) 848-4015
Date March 27 2000
REPORT ON
BEARING RATIO
Cllent:
Gale Industries
clo Masco Corporation
21001 Van 80rn
Taylor MI48180
Gale Insulation
PrQj~~t.
Sample
light brown gray sand
Date Sampled: March 21 2000
location
nls
Sampled By' M a
SIEVE ANAL YSIS
Sieve Size Percent PassinQ
1 Y2 Inch 100
1 Inch 100
3/4 Inch 100
I
~ Inch 100
3/8 Inch 100
No 4 100
No 10 100
No 20 99
No 30 97
No 60 44
No 80 13
No. 100 8
No 200 06
Maximum Density (pet) 1033
Optimum MOisture (%) 134
Maximum LBR (%) 18
DIstribution 41 Chent
Peter G Read, P E
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES
_ ~ J ~/ J ::, 6... 2 ~")
TIme and Date ofMeetmg & 34:,~ 5['V'~
Those attendmo meetmo' - ~~c[ ~-e'" P (.. 2-
;:, ~
~ - -, I
~a..-- / fL-.' r
PRE-APPLICATION CONTACT QUESTIONS
~ /
([5 JJ '1"3 (- 7/45'
ApplIcant's Name
11/ Mtvld 1/#
J??fJ ~ ~ ('.41 C>
/ ,
Phone
1 HAVE YOU SPOKEN TO ANY STAFF MEMBER ABOUT THE PROJECT?
Yes No
(IF YES, HAVE THOSE STAFF MEMBERS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR THE PRE-
APPLICATION MEETING?
STAFF MEMBERS NAME
2 LOCATION OF PROPERTY (CROSS STREETS/INTERSECTIONS)
~Az ~''''5 - /e.
-n. o-v-e- a..- _~
3
WHAT \VOULD YOU LIKE TO DO?
NEW PROJECT
BUILDING EXPA1'l"SION OR MODIFICATION
CHANGE IN PRIOR USE?
IS THE STRUCTURE CURRENTLY VACANT?
VARIANCETYFE
POOL OR SCREEN ENCLOSURE
CO~ERCiALPROPERTY?
RESIDENTiAL PROPERTY?
ll{DUSTRlALPROPERTY?
DO YOU KNOW THE ZONING CODE DESIGNATION?
"
4 TIME AND DATE PREFERRED
5 HOW M.ANY PEOPLE WILL BE AT THE PRE-APP MEETING?
Note. Tell the persoll that someolle from the Departmellt will call them to cOllfirm the meeting
..................................................................................
. Pre-application meetIngs should be scheduled for a minimum of one (1) hour time module, and should be scheduled
no less than two (2) days prior to date/time of meeting. If urgency is sensed, discuss wIth Mike or Lusia.
. Meetinl!:s mav be scheduled.
Monday afternoons
Tuesday all day
Wednesday all day
Thursday mornings
Note' LusIa is not available for Tuesday a.m. meetmgs,
and Mike is not available on Mondays between 11.30 a.m. and 2.30 p.m.
S. \Planning\Planning\Pre-applicationcontactquestions.doc
I/~ f'.;1~ 4- &-a~ .JLd~
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING LOG
PHONE
l\tIEETING DATE
S-lS----O L,
APPLICATIONS ftJJ
ZONING DISTRICT P \ t>
PROJECT NAt'\1E r:LV\ ~,vsv' ~~h 0"Yl
ATTENDING STAFF M"D.
ATTENDING AS APPLIC
fY1 (-D
/FAX
R
j TIlYIE
,v\ Sf'M
I 3D - 2 3c)
/FAX.
I
PROPOSED TYPE OF USE/OCCUPAt'{CY
DATE SUBiYlITTAL RECEIVED DATE DE~lED
COMj,\1ENTS
NAi'YIE OF APPLICANT/CONTACT
ADDRESS
PHONE (~\""2j 14.Z.- &"SO
PROJECT ADDRESS
\,
J'\SHRDATA\PI:lnning\SHARED\\VP\PROJECTS\PRE APPLICATIO:--iS :-.lEETL.....G LOGSiPre-Applic:lcion ~lcc[in;;: Log.doc
"
C12-/T1Lo _ 132-I\CE @ fY)ftSCD ttQ.CD~
CV'tl\) -
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING
SIGN IN SHEET
PLEASE PRINT
,....
...:>- I .s - Oc
l.\'IEETING DATE
TINIE
ATTENDING FOR APPLICANT
NOTICE The purpose of this conference shall be for the staff and applicant to discuss overall
community goals, objectives, policies and codes ass related to the proposed development and to
discuss site plan review procedures. Opinions express at the pre-application conference are not
binding for formal review purposes. Additional staff comments may be forth coming based on actual
lans submitted for review
City of Boynton Beach Attending for Applicant
Attendino Staff
--A
.,
J'\SHRDATA\PLA."'i;"iL"GiSHARED\\VP\FOR.\IS\PRE-APPL MEETf.'oiG-SIG;"i L"i SHEET.DOC
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING LOG
Meeting Date: J, 7 00
PURPOSE OF APP ICATION
ZONE 0/D
PROJECT NAME
66-k Y rd2vs /C5
Attending Staff: ,1--10-/ I E~'71
Attending for Applicant: ~,' /..
f''' ~ :r... Y'c <t:....
Phone:, () 7- 3:5 ( - 611b
Name of Owner.
Address
Phone:
Name of Applicant/Contact:
Time: q ..10
~~
Fax:
Address.
Phone:
Fax.
PROJECT ADDRESS.Lfl..X~ n:f'-Jy>'\..
Lu 52.. - J- C - c..
Phone:
TYPE OF APPLICATION
TYPE OF BUSINESS
Date Submittal Received
COMMENTS
f(
Date Denied.
\forms\Pre-Application Meeting Log.doc
c~
/) ~ "'-~
n /Jyc.~
~ ~-
C?{ ~ /-jJ
<:'c <
PRE-APPLICATION MEETIN~~,~~
SIGN IN SHEET ~~~'-
J":' _-
PLEASE PRINT ~<"
l"IEETING DATE
TIME
ATTENDING FOR APPLICANT
NOTICE The purpose of this conference shall be for the staff and applicant to discuss overall
community goals, objectives, policies, and codes as related to the proposed development and to
discuss site plan review procedures. Opinions expressed at the pre-application conference are not
binding for formal review purposes. Additional staff comments may be forth coming based on actual
plans submitted for review
City of Boynton Beach
Attendin Staff
Attending for Applicant
rY/;-~ r?v f'Yl
1-11 K. rz:
J Irtu c.Jf
I
0.2'1 \.
1~{jUlLDING SETBACK
I
~
~
~
ll..
~
-.;
...J
~
~
u
41
o 20
-- 1
..
LOT 50-8
(vacant)
ONTAINS 4250 ACRES - --
I,t,~~t~:
- .~"
C\J
~ ~t~tl~J,~t~~f;~
fo-< --
~
~
~
-
-...
f\....
lJJ
~~
4"
'<
S'- j.
-.' ~
~~
\
.
.
If)
~
0)
C)
o
-
C)
<:
) /' ---
I .,.--
I /
I / /
1/ / 12' FlORIDA POWF: AND l
LIGHT CASeMCNT
~ ~lY
/ ~~~ \J~
"<s
" ~,-
" ~.s
"
-
ELIl)
I
t\J1
c)
-t-
I
/
\
-'" \
~
\
\
':
""hI'
r },--yj-< N 8
I -I
1 rUIINn I/P
\' I [\ AND CAP I
! I~
I V)
I I~
I ...J
I I s
I ~ - (
~I\j ~ OUAI
I I ~ ~
I I ~ IV)
i- l-
I
11
"
~
'<:t
...J
Cl...
t5
Cl...
lu
~
...J
6
~
~
lu
\J)
"
~
a.
...J
::;
en
)
---
lu (UII
_ A/V
lC)
a
~71
- I
() OJ
lC),
--..- --1
1
N 88'50'54 W 35000'
IJJ.9:r
f---4--{----- ti---~-----'-
\, II
"'-.\1 ANCHOR (
(TYPICAL) ,
~ /
~ I
/
I
r--
) )} O---l
L 15' UTILITY E HEAD
SOUTHERN 8 AND FLORIDA POWER
I
LOT 50-C I
(vacant) 0aOYNTON CANAL?
CONTAINS 1162 ACRES \
"".
OP OF BANKJ
APPROXIMATE EDGE OF WATER (9-08-99) 1
~
>-~, ~~- ..
l
\
~
N 88050'54" W
350 00'
( "POUND 5/,
AND CAP
4,
o
"'l
lu
lC)
SJ
ORTH
'- ---- ~::,;..,-----:;:".. -~-_..~
-- -
C)
~
\)
-..J
1/
f;(~
f -
(J 1 /-'1 r" t \ /1,1,"-
/~ ( f f ELfcTRIC TRANSMISSION &
DISTRIBUTION LINE EASEMENT
}.\ ~. ;> 7 ,. 11" 11" 1',(..". i)
I
{'
f-~,f\
I \!Le.'-/
C> ~ ~~~)I! I
~ Iii' ~
{1/J " ~
~
~o
(J
~ r ~
[. ~
D I
\I --j"
IA"' /J
l~'j ----- f., ~
'r., \ ~ C,
~u . I, ~
~ ~::.. 1 ~
;/ .0' J (-8/1 () " C!
I l6V I ~ ~
\ r ~ \, r---? I r
/
V'........
I
I
I
I ...
. ,.~..L~
Ii
~.V-
t -<
,~ \-.r('"
",.... 'l"~
......" A'-
~
lD
I
Cl
A-
\
\
, "
~! ~ 'I I_
I \ ~~ { 1
\ . OFEI.C.ES ~ F. "
~\:--mEHOUSE ,= .l~F.
~ EXPANSION = 9:000 SF.
\J re- ,J iff
----:- --n..J1 ~ III {,,,-V~-"" () \
~NC ~
~ .--
-----
/
/
'(~It S~' rf,~.. ! 11r) ( r
i; ( 11 I t V' I (, ~\ ( U
,
~ ) .~
i ,- t()qclI ("I \ 7- ('
~';\.. S'"88d - 50~" .'E ........133 - 9~-" -
(irrP. ~ b
~til'
\%~
\~
\~
. ,
,
J'f3 -f/L
1~
~t;J
",,./I
L- '
D';; f /
I( / H s.
1
,
\
\
:IIi\." '';'~~' \
~1$1"! ~ y,
\'
I
\
lifrLfDb
(15\'
/ ~o (01 (~(
~-,/) \ t/ )
J ('I
__ \,u'\l
- S 88d -sol54" E
;Y)N
{'/1
~
~ - ~,-~- ...
437 20
DOYNrrON CANAlj
------------