Loading...
LEGAL APPROVAL DEVELOPMENT~RDER OF THE CITY COMMISS'.!lN 0 C~ .iOF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORID. PROJECT NAME. Quantum Corporate Park DRI Lot #52 rn~wrn 001 ~ -, ,iI ; j .......... ,J U1. .- ~ ......'"-6 APPLICANT'S AGENT Winston Lee, Winston Lee and Associates, Inc. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. APPLICANTS ADDRESS 1532 Old Okeechobee Road, Suite 106, West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 DATE OF RATIFICATION CITY COMMISSION: 8/18/98 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT New Site Plan LOCATION OF PROPERTY 2400 Quantum Lakes Drive DRAWING(S) SEE EXHIBITWB" AlTACHED HERETO X THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows: OR THIS MA TIER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1 Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant .lL HAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit wC. with notation wlncluded. 4 The Applicant's application for relief is hereby .lL GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order \\\ \ \ \\111111/'" :-.\\ III. 7 other ~,,, 13 0 Y N 'r q~ ~~ 0< ....~o.... 01- ~ ,... . <(J' Ifti.... 6\ \ :: J.. i~ ~. (<\ :::. ~ iU{ 192 )\~; DATED' ~4he . ~~~~<'~, ~ '...3 ~ . City Clerk ~/","'~ 0 RIO" 1<..#' J:\SHRDA TAIPlanning\SHARED\WPIPROJECTS\QuantumlLot 52\OEVELOPMENT ORDER.doc '1110"" r 1111\\\\\\'1: EXlDBIT "c" ConditIons of A>>>>roval Project name: Quantum Corporate Park DRI Lot #52 File number' NWSP 98-008 Reference: The olans consist of9 sheets identified as 2nd Review. New Site Plan. File # NWSP 98-008 with a June 30. 1998 Planninsz and Zoninsz Det>artment date stamD markinlZ. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: None X UTILITIES Comments: None X FIRE Comments: None X POLICE Comments: None X ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: , I All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code X requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies, such as FOOT, PBC, SFWMD, OERM, LWDO, DEP and any others, shall be included with your permit request. 2. Show all interior traffic control markings (stop signs, stop bars, one-way X signs, etc.) on site plan. [LDR Chapter 4, Section 7.B.2.] 3 Add note to site plan indicating that "All parking areas shall conform to X Chapter 23 of the Land Development Regulations including standard drawings B-90012, B-90013" 4 Add note to site plan indicating that "All drainage structures and french X drain shall conform to Chapter 6 and 23 of the Land Development Regulations including standard drawing B-91007" BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 5 The proposed monument signs do not comply with the Quantum X Corporate Park approved sign program and sign code with respect to Page 2 Quantum Corporate Park - Lot #52 File No. NWSP 98-008 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT quantity, conf18uration and color Therefore, prior to the applicant submitting for pennit approval, the plans shall be amended to show compliance wIth the approved sign program or the applicant shall request and receive approval of a modification to the sign program that would allow the subject signage. At the June 30, 1998 Technical Review Committee meeting, the applicant agreed to process a subsequent request for a sign program modification. (Article IV, Section 7 of Chapter 21 - Sign Code) 6 At time of permit review, identify the setback dimension from the south X property line to the leading edge of the drive-through canopy 7 Place a note on the elevation view drawing indicating that the building X signage shall comply with the sign regulations identified in the Sign Code (Chapter 21) and Community Design Plan (Chapter 9) of the Land Development Regulations. PARKS AND RECREA nON Comments: None X FORESTER/ENVlRONMENTALIST ~ Comments: None X PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 8. Locate safe 10 foot by 35 foot (10' x 35') site triangles at the entries on X the site plan and landscape plans. Ch.7.S Art.II Sec.S Par.H 9 Submit the future parking canopy details on a 24"x36" sheet, as part of X the architectural plans. The separate 8 W' x 11" sheet, as submitted, may become detached and lost. Ch.4 Sec.7 ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDmONS 10 NONE. X ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 11 Tg ;1 aetertHiRl&.o HeNS" ~ Idim J:\SHRDATAIPI...'\NNING\SHAREOIWPlPROJECT&\Q\JANTUMIlOT 52 NWSP\2ND REVlEW-COND OF APPR4.0T 52 NWSP.DOC I ; , MEETING MINUTES PLANNING. DEVELOF>. .cNT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 14,1998 REPRESENTATIVES. WITHIN TEN MINUTES, THE MEETING RECONVENED Chairman Wische acknowledged the presence in the audience of Bulert Kastarlak, Director of Development. 2. PROJECT AGENT LOCATION DESCRIPTION. QuantQm Corporate Park DR! - Lot 52 Winston lee Winston Lee and Associates, Inc. 2400 Quantum Lakes Drive Request for site plan approval to construct a 60,753 square foot, three-story office building on 4 41 acres. Eugene Gerlicker, Mock-Roos and Associates, introduced the applicant, Tom McGilicucldy from MFT Development and John Glidden of Oliver and Glidden. The Recording Secretary administered the oath to all that would be testifying during these proceedings. Winston Lee. 1532 Old Okeechobee Road. West Palm Beach. apologized for arriving late. He stated that he has worked very closely with staff and resolved all of the issues. He is in agreement with the nine staff comments. CHAIRMAN WISCHE ANNOUNCED THE PUBUC HEARING. THERE WAS NO ONE PRESENT WHO WISHED TO SPEAK ON THIS PETTIlON. Mr Rosenstock expressed concern about the size of the pedestal sign. He feels it is overstated for the size of the project. Mr lee explained. that Comments 5 and 6 require the applicants to bring back a comprehensive sign program if there will be any deviation from what was previously approved. - Mr Rumpf further stated that the applicant's signage must comply with the existing approved sign program in Quantum Park. Mr Lee clarified that there was an original sign program developed 10 years ago. CarMax modified the signage showing certain sign elements including a larger sign base. When Mr lee submitted this package, staff advised that their sign was not consistent with either of the two approved plans. Therefore, staff plaCed a condition on this approval requiring that all signage for the project will have to be approved by the Oty The applicant will bring back a comprehensive program to upgrade all signage in Quantum Park. Mr lee reminded the board members that the application before them did not include signage. Mr Rumpf confirmed, however, that a sign would be approved during this meeting per staff comments that it be consistent with the sign program. With so much going on in Quantum Park at this time, additional approvals are anticipated in the near future. When the applicant feels the time is right, the signs for this site and other sites will be combined and the sign program will be modified. .. MEETING MINUTES PLANNING&. DEVELOr- ~NT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 14, 1998 Mr Rosenstock pointed out that the Planning & Development Board has been charged with the responsibility of approving signage throughout the aty If a Code is adopted for Quantum Park, the board will not be able to approve or reject the signage. Mr Rumpf reminded Mr Rosenstock that a sign program currently exists. If the plan goes through the permit process and proceeds, the City would only permit the sign that is consistent with the existing sign program that the City has approved. The applicant does not anticipate this happening. It is anticipated that other projects will come on line timely so that a revision to the sign program can be processed. That procedure will go through the public hearing process and the Planning & Development Board and aty Commission will approve it. The sign being approved at this point is one of the original Quantum Park signs and it is slightly larger than 16 square feet Mr Lee explained that during staff review, there was agreement that because the signs being proposed were not part of a comprehensive package, there would be a condition placed on the project that it will meet an approved sign plan. An updated sign plan has not yet been submitted. Therefore, the sign will either meet what is already approved or a comprehensive plan will be brought forward. Mr Myott observed sign construction on Gateway Boulevard when he visited the site. He asked for clarification. Tom McGllllcuddv. 19020 Palmland Drive. Bovnton Beach. advised that the metal on some of the signs that have been in place for years has been stolen and sold for scrap metal. There is no sign construction in progress. Vice Chairman Reed feels the landscaping plan for this project will be a contribution to the Oty He questioned why Bahia and St Augustine grasses are being mixed. Mr Lee advised that this mixture would be on the southeastern portion of the site only where the grasses abut an upland preserve. The applicant is attempting to extend the upland system to the edge of pavement Vice Chairman Reed also mentioned a new program in this State known as the Rorida Yard and Neighborhoods Program. This program provides standards for maintaining landscaping in southern Rorida. By meeting certain levels of management practices, the properties become certified. Vice Chairman Reed suggested that Mr Lee investigate becoming part of this program through the County Extension Service. ~ In response to Mr Rosenstock's question, Mr Lee advised that the lake would be used to irrigate landscaping in the project. CHAIRMAN WlSCHE ANNOUNCED THE PUBUC HEARING. THERE WAS NO ONE PRESENT WHO WISHED TO SPEAK ON THIS PETITION. Motion Mr Dube moved to approve the request for site plan approval to construct a 60,753 square foot, three-story office building on 4 41 acres for Quantum Corporate Park DRI - Lot 52 subject to all 5 MEETING MINUTES PLANNING It DEVEU"....MENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 14, 1998 staff comments. Mr Myott seconded the motion that carried unanimously 8. Other None 9. Comments by members . Construction Behind Amoco Station Mr Dube questioned whether staff had investigated the building being constructed behind the Amoco station Mr Rumpf advised that there is no intentional phasing of the project. They are actively seeking leases at this time. Once they lease 50% of the building, they will come in for permits to construct the- building. Mr Rosenstock. questioned whether the developer has the right to phase a project even though the Planning & Devetopment Board and Oty Commission did not approve a phased project. Mr Rumpf explained that he was not familiar with tI:1e conditions of approval for this project because he was not involved in the project at that time. Chairman Wische pointed out that if the developer planned more than one construction phase, the board and Oty would have apprised of that fact. The Planning & Development Board thought the entire project would be built at one time. Mr Rosenstock requested that the Plann,ing Department and Mr Kastariak investigate what the Oty Commission and Planning & Development Board approved, and verify that the project will be built in its entirety without phases. If this is not the case, the Planning & Devetopment Board should be notified immediately by mail so that action can be taken. Mr Myott explained that there is concern about the public being able to see the overhead doors. He wants to be sure the overhead doors will be screened from view as indicated on the plan. . Renovation Project on Federal Highway Mr Myott referred to a renovation project that is in progress on North Federal Highway, south of the Auto Care Center This renovation project looks awful. Mr Myatt questioned whether this project was processed through an aesthetic review, and pointed out that this is a perfect example of why the Planning & Development Board should review exterior renovations, exterior color changes and exterior detail changes. Mr Rumpf advised that he was not aware of the permit history on this project. He offered to investigate this situation and report back to the board. 6