LEGAL APPROVAL
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
DivisIon of PlannIng and Zoning
Building
Planning & Zoning
Engineering
Occupational License
Community Redevelopment
May 13, 1999
Winston Lee
Winston Lee & AssocIates, Inc.
1532 Old Okeechobee Rd.
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Re
FIle No
LocatIOn.
Quantum Park Lot 58
NWSP 99-005
Quantum Lakes Dnve (Quantum Park PID, Lot 58)
Dear Mr Lee
Enclosed IS the City of Boynton Beach Development Order for new SIte plan granted on May 4,
1999
To contmue thIS project through the development process, please submIt to thIS office a rectified
plan (a SIte plan revIsed to mcorporate all applicable condItIons of approval)
Should you have any questIOns regardmg thIS matter, please feel free to contact thIS office at
(561)742-6260
Smcerely,
f'hL- ~
Michael W Rumpf
DIrector of Planmng & Zomng
MWR.Jma
J:\SHRDA T AIPLANNING\SHAREDlWPIPROJECTS\QUANTUM\QUANTUM PARK LOT 58\DEVELOPMENT ORDER LETTER DOC
America's Gateway to the Gulfstream
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P,O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX. (561) 375-6259
DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
~~.
~
PROJECT NAME: Quantum Park Lot 58
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Winston Lee I Winston Lee & Associates, Inc.
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 1532 Old Okeechobee Rd, West Palm Beach, FL 33409
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: May 4, 1999
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: New Site Plan
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Quantum Lakes Drive (Quantum Park PID, Lot 58)
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
X THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows:
OR
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was.made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
..x.. HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "CO with notation "Included".
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
..x GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
7. Other
DATED: S-7-QQ ~>>t. p^~
City Clerk
J:\SHROATA\PIanning\SHARED\'NP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM LOT 58\DEVELOPM RDER
EXHIBIT "c"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Project name: Quantum Park - Lot 58
File number: NWSP 99-005
Reference' The olans consist of 5 sheets identified as 2nd Review New Site Plan File # NWSP 99-005
.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments:
1. Waste removal in connection with construction process must be serviced X
by the City of Boynton Beach. Place note on dumpster detail to indicate
same.
UTILITIES
Comments:
2. LOR chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building X
will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hy'drant. Please
demonstrate that the. plan meets this condition, by adjusting hydrant
locations as needed.
FIRE
Comments:
3. No part of any structure shall be more than 200 feet from a hydrant. X
Show Fire Department connection location,
POLICE
Comments: None X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
4, All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code X
requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not
limited to the following: site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing,
landscaping and irrigation, Permits required from other permitting
agencies, such as FOOT, PBC, SFWMD, OERM, L WOO, OEP and any
others, shall be included with your permit request. .
S. Add a note to the Paving and Drainage plan stating that all proposed X ~
storm drainage structures and pipes in Phase II will be constructed with
Phase 1.
6. Add a note to the Wastewater and Water plan stating that all proposed X
water and sewer lines in Phase II will be constructed with Phase 1.
t
Page 2
Quantum Park - Lot 58
File No.: NWSP 99-005
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
7. Remove proposed median cut on Quantum Lakes Drive and install X
"Right Turn Only" sign at exit, or close existing median opening to the
east at Lot 59 and replace with proposed opening. Proposed opening is
too close to existing opening at lot 59 to ensure safe and proper design,
The existing median opening at lot 59 should be moved to the eastern
end of lot 59 if properly designed with adjoining intersection. This
relocation should be done in conjunction with the ultimate development
oflot 59, (MUTCO)
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Comments:
8, IdentifY the finish floor elevation of the buildings within the footprint of X
the buildings that are illustrated on the Floor & Roof Plan. Provide
notes, measurements and computations on the site plan or floor plan that
verifies the proposed finish floor elevation is in compliance with the
minimum standards.. VerifY that the finish floor meets the minimum
elevation required by the flood zone that the project is located within.
VerifY that the finish floor meets the minimum elevation that is required
by the South Florida Water Management ~istrict permit for the overall
project. Also, verifY that the elevation of the finish floor is not less than
six inches above the crown of the abutting rights-of-way.
9. At time of permit review, indicate within the occupancy classification X
and type of construction note found on the Floor & Roof Plan drawing
the number of stories and total floor area of each building. The building
area, number of stories, occupancy classification and type of
construction shall comply with the specifications identified in the
Building Code,
10, Amend the site sign detail drawing to comply with the color X
specifications listed on the approved sign program.
11. Indicate on the paving and drainage plan the elevation of the finish X
surface at each accessible parking space. Where the accessible route to
the building from the accessible parking spaces is not specified on the
plans as flat or level, show, dimension and label the below listed
accessible route components on the plans. The illustration of the
accessible route components shall verifY that the difference in elevation
from the accessible parking spaces to the finish floor at each tenant
, space is in compliance with the Accessibility Code for Building
Construction.
Location, design and width of curb cuts.
Page 3
Quantum Park - Lot 58
File No.: NWSP 99-005
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
IdentifY the location, width, slope, cross slope and length of portions of
the route that have a slope that is less than 1:20 (ex: 1:21).
IdentifY the location, width, and slope, cross slope and length oframps.
The Accessibility Code states that surfaces are considered ramps when
they have a slope that is greater than 1:20 (ex: I: 19),
IdentifY the location, width, length, and slope and cross slope of all
landings that are required at the top and bottom of each ramp and at the
building entrance. The Accessibility Code considers surfaces with a
1:50 slope as level. The I :50 slope is acceptable for the landings that
are required at ramps and the level surface that is required at the
Accessible entrance to a building/tenant space.
Where the Accessibility Code indicates a handrail is required, show and
label them on the drawing. Also, provide detail drawings depicting
height and shape of the handrails.
Show and identifY the shape and slope of thresholds that are used at the
accessible entrances.
IdentifY the type of material and type of finish surface that is proposed
for the accessible route
12, Please note that compliance with the site lighting regulations is evaluated X
at time of permit review.
13, At time of permit review, a current survey is required. Add to the site X
plan all easements shown on the survey. Where applicable, amend the
plans so that structures do not encroach into an easement.
14. To efficiently move from site plan approval to permit review, It IS X
recommended that the permit applicant and contractor contact a Plans
Analyst in the Building Division of the Development Department to
obtain a permit submittal checklist.
15. Compliance with the building codes will be evaluated at time of permit X
reView. The permit fee, water and sewer facility fees, county fees and -
state fees will be determined at time of permit review.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None X
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
,
Page 4
Quantum Park - Lot 58
File No.: NWSP 99-005
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments: None X
I PLANNING AND ZONING
I
Comments:
16. All plans shall be signed and sealed at the time of building permit X
submittal.
17. Provide the following information in the site plan tabular data (Chapter X
4 Sec. 7 Par E):
Parking calculations to include number of employees
Setback chart
Loading requirements (Chapter 2 Section 11 Par J2).
pm open space requirements (Chapter 2 Section 7 Par H.3).
18, Provide the required loading area, unobstructed and screened, or add X
note indicating that all delivery or related vehicles can be
accommodated by typical parking spaces.
19. Plans must be approved by the Quantum Park Architectural Review X
Board prior to site plan approval.
20, Colored rendering shows foundation planting along from fa9ade, X
21. IdentifY the maximum square footage allocated to each reserved sign X
space to show compliance with maximum allowed by code and to ensure
that the maximum square footage is not exhausted prior to buildout.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD COMMENTS
22. Delete comment #5. X
23, Delete comment #6. X
24. Delete comment # 7, X
~?DITIONAL CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS
25, None X
MWRljma/dim
\\CH\MAJN\SHRDATA\PLANNTNG\SHAJUID\WPlJtROIECfS\QUA.NTtJM\QUANnJM PAIlK LOT 5NND REVIEW COMMENTS.DOC
TIie City of
13oynton $eacfi
100 T.. tJWynton tJJeadi. tJJoukvam
p O. tJJ~310
tJJognton fJJeadi., !J1Orufa 33425-0310
City!J{afl: (561) 375-6000
!JjU". (561) 375-6090
CERTIFICATION
I, SUZANNE M. KRUSE, CITY CLERK of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, do
hereby certify that attached Ordinance #099-05 consisting of six (6) pages and
Exhibit "A" consisting of three (3) pages, are true and correct copies as they appear
in the records of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida.
WITNESS, my hand and the corporate seal of the CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, this 12th day of March, 1999
\\\\,,\1 \I" 1111/111.
~'\'" -0( NTO^, I/~/.
.s- hoO ........ IY~ ~
s:- v ..- OCAa.. '\'- ~
~ <<. ....!<-? ''''1l''~'.."9 ~
.::- 0 ~AL) <:)'." ~
::: \ :t ::.
= > :- : =
- .... . .-
%0 \ -'92() r ff
~ '- \ ..- ~
~ ,..-..... 'r" ~
~1/1. FLO~\~\\,#'
71111/111 11"'\\\\
~~0Jt.~<x-~
, SU ANNE M. KRUSE, C C/ AAE
City Clerk
March 12, 1999
.:;trruriaJ s gateway to tfu (jutfstream
\
ORDINANCE N0tJ99-dd'
'..
,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A DETERMINATION THAT
CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT
OF REGIONAL IMPACT APPROVED IN ORDINANCE
NO 84-51, AND AMENDED IN ORDINANCES NOS. 86-
11, 86-37, 88-3, 94-10, 94-51, 96-33, 96-65 AND 97-20
DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION
UNDER CHAPTER 38006, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1996,
DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW IS NECESSARY
REGARDING SUCH CHANGES, APPROVING SUCH
CHANGES, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER
(ORDINANCE NOS 84-51, 86-11 86-37, 88-3, 94-10, 94-
51, 96-33, 96-65 AND 97-20) FOR PURPOSES OF
INCORPORATING THE APPROVED CHANGES, AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Riteco Development Corporation, a F1c.rida corporation ("Riteco")
filed with the City of Boynton Beach (the "City") an Application for Development Approval
, of Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact (the ADA") on May 21, 1984,
i regarding that certain property (the "Property") described in Exhibit U A", attached hereto
! I
and made a part of hereof; and
, .
,I
, I
I'
I was granted December 18, 1984 pursuant to Ordinance No 84-51 (the "Development
WHEREAS the ADA was approved and the Development Order for the Property
Order") , and
WHEREAS, Riteco subsequently conveyed its right, title and interest in and to
, the Property to Boynton Park of Commerce, Inc., a Florida corporation (UBoynton Park"),
i i and, Boynton Park, in turn, subsequently conveyed its right, title and interest in and to
I I the Property to Quantum Associates, a Florida general partnership (the "Developer"),
I i and
II
,I
I WHEREAS Developer filed with the City respective applications to amend the
I
I Development Order, which applications were approved by the City in Ordinance No 86-
Page 1 of 6
11, Ordinance No 86-37, Ordinance No 88-3, Ordinance No 94-10, Ordinance No 94-
i i
51, Ordinance No 96-33, Ordinance No 96-65 and Ordinance No 97-20; and
WHEREAS. the term "Development Order" includes all amendments thereto, and
WHEREAS, Developer is the current owner and developer of the remaining
vacant land within the Property (commonly known as the Quantum Corporate Park at
Boynton Beach Development of Regional Impact, or the Quantum Park DRI), and
WHEREAS, Developer has submitted to the City a Notification of Proposed
Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("NO PC") requesting
a further amendment to the Development Order for the purpose of revising the Master
Site Development Plan as follows Lot 2: The use designation has been changed from
"officelindustrial" to "office/industrial/hotel" to accommodate the development of
additional rooms adjacent the existing Hampton Inn The additional rooms are planned
to be within the current allowable thresholds and development order conditions, Lots 66,
67 -A and 67 -C The use designation is changed from "office/industrial/hotel" to
"office/ind ustrial/commercial"
This use designation change is proposed to
accommodate a complementary commercial development adjacent the proposed multi-
I screen stadium seating movie theater complex upon Lots 83 through 88, inclusive, Lots
"
76, 81 and 82: The use designation has been changed from
II
I
"office/industrial/commercial" to "office/industrial" This change reduces the acreage
,;
i
designated for commercial uses. These properties were purchased with deed
restrictions prohibiting commercial developments. The "office/industrial" developments
upon these lots will be in accordance with the current thresholds for gross floor areas for
these uses
Lots 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 and 88 The use designation "Attrraction and
i i
Ii
Recreation" (AR) has been added to the current designation of "office/industrial" for
these lots, These lots total 22.50 acres. The use designation is added to allow for a
I
I
I
Page 2 of 6
i i
I
multi-screen, stadium seating movie theater complex. The proposed change is
requested without an increase in the total vested trip generation of 63,752 trips. The
commutative changes in the use designations have reduced the land area available for
'-' commercial development from 3324 acres to 31.24 acres, the "office/industrial/hotel"
use designation has been reduced from 801 acres to 378 acres and the
"office/industrial" use designation has been reduced from 150 73 acres to 134 28 No
change to the DRI is proposed other than as set forth herein Because of the multiple
land use designatio.ns on many of the lots within the DRI project, the applicants submits
that completion of the Substantial Deviation Determination Chart would not be
productive
WHEREAS, the City Commission of Boynton Beach, as the governing body
having jurisdiction, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for
amendments to development orders approving developments of regional impact
pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996), and
i,
I
WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered the testimony, reports and
other documentary evidence submitted at said public hearing by Developer, the City
staff and the public, and the City Planning and Development Board's recommendations
of the 23rd of February, 1999; and
WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered all of the forgoing.
I!
I
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
, i CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT
I
, i
! ' Section 1 A notice of public hearing was duly published on the 18th day of
I January, 1999, in the Palm Beach Post, a newspaper of general circulation in Boynton
I
Beach, Florida, pursuant to Chapter 38006, Florida Statutes, and proof of said
i,
I:
I
Ii
I
I
I
...1
publication has been duly filed
Page 3 of 6
i
i;
! provisions.
Section 2. The Development Order shall be amended to include the following
Lot 2: The use designation has been changed from "office/industrial" to
....
I "office/industrial/hotel" to accommodate the development of additional rooms adjacent
the existing Hampton Inn The additional rooms are planned to be within the current
allowable thresholds and development order conditions, Lots 66, 67 -A and 67 -C The
use designation is changed from "office/industrial/hotel" to "office/industrial/commercial"
This use designation change is proposed to accommodate a complementary
commercial development adjacent the proposed multi-screen stadium seating movie
theater complex upon Lots 83 through 88, inclusive, Lots 76 81 and 82: The use
designation has been changed from "office/industrial/commercial" to "office/industrial"
This change reduces the acreage designated for commercial uses These properties
were purchased with deed restrictions prohibiting commercial developments The
I "office/industrial" developments upon these lots will be in accordance with the current
I I
I thresholds for gross floor areas for these uses. Lots 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 and 88 The use
designation "Attraction and Recreation" (AR) has been added to the current designation
of "office/industrial" for these lots These lots total 22.50 acres The use designation is
Ii added to allow for a proposed multi-screen, stadium seating movie theater complex.
,:
I Twenty (20) screens are proposed The proposed change is requested without an
I:
I
increase in the total vested trip generation of 63,752 trips. The comulative changes in
the use designations have reduced the land area available for commercial development
I
I
i from 3324 acres to 31 24 acres, the "office/industrial/hotel" use designation has been
! i
reduced from 8 01 acres to 3 78 acres and the "office/industrial" use designation has
been reduced from 150 73 acres to 134.28 No change to the DRI is proposed other
i than as set forth herein Because of the multiple land use designations on many of the
I
I
Ii
i
Page 4 of 6
II
lots within the DRI project, the applicants submits that completion of the Substantial
Deviation Determination Chart would not be productive.
Section 3 The Development Order shall also be amended to include the
~
Conditions of Approval, attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A"
Section 4. Upon consideration of all matters described in Section 380 06,
Florida Statutes (1996) it is hereby determined that
A. The amendments proposed by Developer do not unreasonably
interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state
land development plan applicable to this area.
B The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the
I : local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations,
,i I
subject to the conditions outlined above
C
The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the
recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council,
II
!
subject to the conditions outlined above.
! !
o
The amendments proposed by Developer do not create any
additional regional impacts and therefore do not constitute a
substantial deviation under Chapter 38006, Florida Statutes (1996).
Section 5 The City Commission has concluded as a matter of law that these
! proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380 06
I
I
I Florida Statutes (1996), that Developer is entitled to the relief prayed and applied for,
and that the Development Order is hereby amended incorporating the amendments
proposed by Developer as set forth in Section 2 above
Section 6 Except as otherwise amended herein, the Development Order shall
Page 5 of 6
Section 7 All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed
Section 8 Should any section or provision of this ordinance or portion hereof
-.. any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be
invalid, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this ordinance
Section 9 Authority is hereby granted to codify said ordinance
Section 10 This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage
FIRST READING this d? day of rE8,;u.l'9~ $I
SECOND READING and FINAL PASSAGE this
,1999
d?
day of
/l/.IIA'C?#
, 1999
CITY OF BOYNT~H, FLORIDA
~ /7 1 b-
~. /u-/:~
Mayor /-
/l
I .
~ J _ / _ .
~ ~~
4-
~
i.
1 !
i
, i
! i
Co issioner
~~
Commissioner
ATTEST
~LVY/1U~~J
C " Y Cl~lif!I'11
\ -;''; \i .111/
" \ ~ 'v t:f //
~ 'l
1'.c:- -fo~
""" ...: "(j oj:. ~
,! s:~\erct\~uantum DRI - ~ 999 g
:: >- ~- ,....r'\ r :
-:: 'r' .. ...... .....' -
':::. ,.,.. -. A ~A.'-' .::::
~ \oJ...... t.w .... ~ ~
'/,. .......... ,0 ~
'it/. FLO~ ~,~
/lllllltlllll\\\\\\\\\'\
i
,I
i i
! !
Page 6 of 6
i,
II
DEVELOPMr - T ORDER OF THE CITY COMMIS~ON OF THE
CII Y OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIL~
PROJECT NAME. Quantum Park PID DRIA
APPLICANT'S AGENT Eugene A. Gerlica, P E. Mock, Roos and Associates, Inc.
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 5720 Corporate Way, West Palm Beach Florida 33407-2066
DATE OF HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION March 2,1999
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT Master Plan Modification with amendment to DRI
LOCATION OF PROPERTY Quantum Corporate Park
DRAWING(S) SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO
THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows
OR
X THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows.
1 Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
lHAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested
3 The conditions for development requested by the Applicant. administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "0" with notation "Included"
4 The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
l GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof
DENIED
5 This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6
All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order
7
Other
~\\\\\\\I" Itlllll/,
~"\'\ -.{ ~TON ~ ~%
~~ (/JO .... ." ,(:1. ~
.... "900. "', - ...
~ I ,,0' nJ'1';::". T", ~
t .0 to. \.' 4#'
-0' . "So'"
:: (CJ \ =
- > .s . =
-: r-
==""'""\ ".:::
- - , n(')~ -
~ (.) .... \ ~t.- . ~
~ .... .... ~ ~
"s. -'....u'- <0 l ~
~~II FLO~\ ~\\~
:tIll"" 1111 \\\\\\
/J~~
City Cle
\\CH\MAIN\SHRDA TA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\ORI - MFT\Develop.Order Fonn.doc
DATED'
if.#?P
Conditions of ADDroval
EXHIBIT "D"
Project name Quantum Park PID DRIA
File number' MPMD 98-006 / DRIA 98-003
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments. None X
UTILITIES
Comments. None X
FIRE
Comments. None X
POLICE !
Comments. None X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments. None X
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments. None X
PARKS AND RECREA nON
Comments. None X
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments. None X
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments.
1 The uses proposed for the lots designated for the "Amusement and X
Recreation" option be unique to the city so as to avoid negative
competitive impacts on existing commercial uses (a theater could be
umque based on additional internal amenities, participation costs, design,
etc.).
Page 2
FlIe Name Quantum Corporate Park - DRI Amendment
File No MPMD 98-006 / DRIA 98-003
DEPARTMENTS lNCLUDE REJECT
2 To aVOid strrp or small commercial uses on lots located at the southwest X
corner of Gateway Boulevard and Park Ridge Boulevard, these lots
(minimizIng outparcel(s)) should be developed as a smgle complex or
consolidated activity center with an emphasIs on uses unIque to the CIty,
whIch would therefore not compete with eXIsting commercial uses
wlthm the commercIal actiVIty center along Congress Avenue ThiS
lImitatIon excludes the planned Mobil statIOn/convenIence store on lot
65-B, and includes uses such as drug store retailers, auto parts or repair
other convenIence stores, copy centers, etc. The use approval process
shall be the means to review future uses for detenmnatlOn of complIance
WIth this condition.
X
3 "Commercial" options be further reduced on lots withIn the Quantum
Park PID (the only remaInIng parcel With the commercial use option is
lot 91, which consists of 6 53 acres at the northeast comer of Gateway
Boulevard and High RIdge Road) The "Commercial" designatIOn
optIOn could be removed, or alternatively, the parcel could be limited to
uses unique to the city's commercial activity center located along
Congress A venue in the VICInity of the Boynton Beach (including hotels
or simIlar uses).
X
4 As an additional option to conditions # 1 and #2, the applicant should
Justify, at the site plan stage, commercial use and demand for these
parcels through a corresponding analysis of needs and supply for the
commercial uses proposed at that time. This analysis should not only
include respective marketing mformation but an analYSIS of land use
distribution which essentially updates and corrects that data found in the
ComprehenSive Plan.
X
5 Finding of non-substantial change by the RPC and state, and satisfying
any conditions from these additional reviewers.
X
6 Remove "office" option from lots 32 through 38, and exclude uses that
are pnncipally warehouses. The use approval process shall be the means
of reviewing for exceptions.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
7 The lots designated attraction and amusement be limited to a multi- X
screen movie theater with ancillary uses on site.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
8, NONE X
J'\SHRDA T A\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\DRI MFl'\1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS-DRI.doc
MEmNG MINUTES
PLANNING ... DEVELOP~ - 'T BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORj,....A
APRIL 27, 1999
Ms. Cottrell questioned whether the motion included the deletion of Condition # 16. The
response from Chairman Wische was affirmative.
C. SITE PLANS
New Site Plan
Description
Lot 58 Quantum Park PIO
Winston Lee, Winston Lee & Associates
MFT Development Inc.
Quantum Lakes Drive
(Quantum Park PID, Lot #58)
Request site plan approval to construct a 51,556
square-foot office building in two phases on 4 93
acres
1
Project Name
Agent:
Owner'
Location
Winston Lee, 1532 Old Okeechobee Road, West Palm Beach, said there were three
conditions he wished to discuss. He introduced Eugene Gerlica, Project Engineer from Mock
Roos.
Condition #5 - "Add a note to the Paving and Drainage plan stating that all
proposed storm drainage structures and pipes in Phase II will be
constructed with- Phase I."
Condition #6 - "Add a note to the Wastewater and Water plan stating that all
proposed water and sewer lines in Phase II will be constructed
with Phase I."
Mr Lee clarified the meaning of these conditions. These conditions require the ultimate
buildout. The applicant would like to be able to phase the project. The retention area
(Condition #5) would be able to successfully handle all water quality issues of the entire
buildout within Phase I. With respect to Condition #6, there is a lOOped pressurized water
system that is completely self-contained and can stand on its own.
The applicant would like to be permitted to phase the stormwater and water and sewer service.
Mr Barber said he had not seen the plans but feels the concern is that Phase II might not
become a reality. Mr Barber agreed that if the applicant had calculations for storing all the
water for the site, he would not be opposed to the applicant's request. Mr Lee and Mr Gerlica
confirmed that the applicant meets those standards.
Mr Gerlica advised that he met with Ray Davidson to discuss his comments. With respect to
the phasing issues, he was satisfied with the applicant's presentation. Mr Gerllca said it was
his understanding that these comments would not be included on the staff report for this board
meeting. Mr Davidson was satisfied with the issues of phasing the water main and looping it
for Phase I. With respect to the water management of the dry pretreatment, what the
11
l'lar-08-2881 89 23a. 81. -084800
ORB 12359 Pg 1336
1IIIIIIIIIHIllI.. .IIUIUII 1.1.
City of Boynton Beach
100 E Boynton Beach Blvd
POBox 310
Boynton Beach,Fl 33425
I
r
-- ~
,-
(
...
~ ;
"
l,.:.~I.
1 - 1'\
EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE made thIS '29 day of
J,,"~.D, tax;,
by 2500 OUANTUM. L.L.c.. a Flonda Lumted LiabIlIty Company
a corporatlon eXIstmg under the laws of
Flonda
and havmg ItS pnncIpal place of busmess at 2500 Quantum Lakes Dnve. SUIte 101,
Boynton Beach. Flonda 33426
first party, to the City of Boynton Beach, a polItICal subdIVISIOn of the State of
Flonda, second party.
(Wherever used herem, the terms, "first party" and "second
party" shall mclude singular and plural, heIrS, legal
representatIves and assIgns of indIvIdual and the successors and
assigns of corporations, wherever the context so adrruts or
reqUIres.)
WITNESSETH
Whereas, the first party IS the owner of property sItuated m Palm Beach
County, Flonda, and described as follows.
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto (Mock-Roos Dwg. No. A-3938, Sheets 1 and 2)
and,
WHEREAS, the second party desires an easement for water and sewer UtIlItIes
and/or other appropnate purposes mCIdental thereto, on, over and across smd
property ,
and,
WHEREAS, the fIrst party IS willIng to grant such an easement,
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants each to the other runmng
and one dollar and other good and valuable consideratIOns, the first party does hereby grant unto
the party of the second party, ItS successors and assIgns, full and free nght and authonty to
construct, mmntmn, repair, install and rebuild faCIlItIes for the above stated purposes and does
hereby grant a perpetual easement on, over and across the above described propertY for smd
purposes.
I i'~,l 2. ,
i'~ {n \
p\
~)!
Letters.qlpl :qlplqu58 '99079 .OO:104Omhjh.doc
,
L.
ORB 1235'9 Pg 1_ 337
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the first party has caused these presents to be duly executed In Its
name and Its corporate seal to be hereto affixed, attested by its property officers thereunto duly
authorIzed, the day and year first above WrItten.
BY
ATTEST
(CORPORATE SEAL)
STATE OF
F1o,- { j}/2,
.
COUNTY OF ~/Jf11, 2 tf~1-1
I
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on tlus day, before me, an officer duly authonzed In the State and
County aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally appeared -~;:.w (/~ /}/l/k IJr).'-AII)
well known to me to be the ,c. PresIdent and F, <l f IZ _' ) L~,) I/l/ ,
rzc n.< T It.
respectIvely, of the CorporatIon named as first party In the foregoIng Easement d that they
severally acknowledged executIng the same In the presence of two subscribIng wItnesses
freely and voluntanly, under authonty duly vested in them by said CorporatIon, and that the
seal affixed thereto IS the true Corporate seal of saId CorporatIon.
WITNE~ my hand and OffiCIal seal In the County and State last aforesaId tlus
J.. 9 - day of !VrJv"#wr'il,/l. A.D, 2000
My corrurusslOn expIres
1'....' '~THOMAS A MCGILLICUDDY
ll:all MY COMMISSION # CC 961458
'll>~."
~~OF"~~ EXPIRES:Augl6,2004
1 ~ARY FL NotIfy SeMat & BoncIng, Inc.
Letters:q Ipl.q Iplqu58 '99079 00'1040mhjh.doc
ORB 12359 Pg 1338
K.\qlpl\qlplqu58\dwg\qu58sk02.dwg 11/28/00 04:23:49 PM EST
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATE IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43
EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING A PORTION OF LOT 58, QUANTUM
PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH, P I 0 PLAT NO 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,
AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 57, PAGES 189 THROUGH 190, INCLUSIVE, OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING AN EASEMENT
12 00 FEET WIDE LYING 6 00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
CENTERLINES
CENTERLINE NO 1
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 58, THENCE ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 58, NORTH 90'00'OOn WEST, A DISTANCE OF
215 05 FEET, THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE, NORTH OOOO'OOn
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 66 33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE, FROM POINT OF BEGINNING, SOUTH 89 57'44n WEST, A DISTANCE OF
30 25 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00'03'37n WEST, A DISTANCE OF 68 87 FEET TO
REFERENCE POINT A, THENCE NORTH 00 03'37n WEST, A DISTANCE OF 92 59
FEET, THENCE NORTH 89 37'02n WEST, A DISTANCE OF 86 24 FEET TO THE
TERMINUS OF CENTERLINE NO 1
CENTERLINE NO 2
BEGINNING AT AFOREMENTIONED REFERENCE POINT A, THENCE SOUTH
87'03'26" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 18 20 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF SAID
CENTERLINE NO 2
THE SIDES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED EASEMENT SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR
SHORTENED, AS NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A CONTINUOUS STRIP OF
LAND 12 00 FEET IN WIDTH AND TO INTERSECT EXISTING EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS
OF WAY OF RECORD
BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASEQ ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 58, QUANTUM
PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH, P I 0 PLAT NO 5, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 57,
PAGES 189-190, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEARING
BEING NORTH 25'36'19n WEST
NOT VALID WITHOUT
ACCOMPANYING SKETCH,
SHEET 2 OF 2
NOTES:
1 I NFORMA T I ON SHOWN HEREON I S BASED
ON DA T A PROV IDEO TO MOCK, ROOS AND
ASSOCIATES, INC BY GEORGE M AYLOR, JR
PLS AND MAPPER, LS'4015, DATED 11-13-99
2 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND
THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA
LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
3 MOCK, ROOS AND ASSOCIATES, INC,
LICENSED AUTHORIZATION NO LB-048
FL E.B. NO. 48
.QJta"'7~th~~
MARY HANNA CLODFELTER
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER
FLORIDA CERTIFICATE NO 4763
SHEET 1 OF 2
SEC.17 lWP.45 S., RGE. 43 E.
FL La NO. 48 12' UTlUTY EASEMENT SCALE: N/A
LOT 58
QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON DATE. 11-27-00
BEACH, P.I.D. PLAT NO.5
PB 57, PGS 189-190 PANO. 99079.00
SECTION 17 TOWNSHIP 45 S. DR. NO. A-3938
REV: --
RELD: --
DRAWN: CAB
APPR: tot
CXHl8\"T A
K:\qlpl\qlplqu~\dwg\qu~sk02.d.9 11/28/00 04:03:34 PM EST
18 17
NOTES:
1 I NFORMA T I ON SHaNN HEREON I S BASED
ON DA T A PROV IDEO TO MOCK, ROOS AND
ASSOCIATES, INC BY GEORGE M AYLOR, JR
PLS AND MAPPER, LSI4015, DATED 11-13-99
2 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND
THE OR I G I NAL RA I SED SEAL OF A F'LOR I DA
LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
3 MOCK, ROOS AND ASSOC I A TES ,
LICENSED AUTHORIZATION NO LB-Q48
4 BEARINGS SHaNN HEREON ARE BASED ON
THE EAST LI NE OF LOT 58, QUANTlJot PARK AT
BOYNTON BEACH, P I 0 PLA T NO 5 , AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 57, PAGES 189-190
PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BEARING BEING NORTH 25 36'19-
WEST LEGEND
t CENTERLINE
A CENTRAL (DELTA) ANGLE
DE ORA I NAGE EASEMENT
ESUT EASEMENT
~ ~FPL FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
15 UE (FPL, SB 'OO...~ 2,0 " L ARC LENGTH
& QC) UNDERGROUND _o\o~'O~",.~.. ./ NO NUMBER
PB 57 PGS 189-190 ~~'l ~ ORB OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
~6 . ~ ,0 PB PLAT BOOK
~ L~'l'~L~'lO~ PG(S) PAGES
'2~ ~.~~ POB POINT OF BEGINNING
J '\22~,\ €I' ~~ POB PO I NT OF Cat.t.ENCEMENT
QC QUANT\Jt.4 COMYllN I CA T I ONS
N07'5447"W I NC
I 3940 RADI US
" NOO'30'20"E SOUTHERN BELL
~ 80.00 UT I L I TY EASEMENT
TERMINUS LOT 59
t NO 1 t NO, 1 QUANTUM PARK AT
12' UE BOYNTON BEACH, P.I.D
PLAT NO, 6
NOO.03'37.W
PB 57 PGS 191-193
N89.37'02.W 92 59' ~
REFERENCE ~ ~
, ~~A ~~
t NO.2 12 U~I POB ~ NO. 2 ~.,*,
S87; a3~~~.W t ~O. 1 ~~ ~
TERMINUS 12 UE ~ ~
2 ~ ~
~ NO POB t NO. 1 ~ 0
NOO. 03' 37.W ~.
68 87'
S89.57'44.W
30 25'
- - - -7O'7.T0-
WEST 1913.40'
ffi-
:117
a::
~
...J
:=l
o
CD
en
en
UJ
a::
"
z
o
u
QUANTUM LAKES DRIVE
TRACT "E"
PB 57 PGS 191-193
FOR PREVIOUS SKETCH
REFER TO MOCK/ROOS
DRAWING NO. A-3821
LOT 58
QUANTUM PARK AT
BOYNTON BEACH, P .I.D
PLAT NO. 5
PB 57 PGS 189-190
12' DE
PB 57
PGS 189-19J
---
REV:
Aa.D:
DRAWN: CAB
APPR: M
NOO'OO'oo"E
66.33'
I N90'00'OO"W
~ - 215.05'
POC
SE CORNER LOT 58
PB 57 SHEET 2 OF 2
PGS 189-190 SEC.17 lWP.455. RGE.43 E-
n. LB. NO. 48 12' UTlUlY EASEMENT SCALE: 1--200'
LOT 58
QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON
BEACH, P .1.0, PLAT NO, 5
EN8INEERS PB 57, PGS 189-190
5720 Corporate Way, West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 SECTION 17 TO\WIISHIP 45 S,
561 683 3113, fax 478 7248
LOT 55
PB 57 PGS 189-190
n. E.B. NO. 48
ORB 12359 Pg 1339
DOROTHY H. WILKEN, CLERK PB COUNTY, FL
o
o
Nti
o~
IOZ
--
o~
0(1)
-
u
X
o~
10"
INC ,
o
DATE: 11-27-00
PANO.99079.oo
DR. NO. A-3938
MEMORANDUM
TO
PETE MAZZELLA, ASST TO THE DIRECTOR
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
DATE,
RE
SUE KRUSE, CITY CLERK
JANUARY 24, 2001
EASEMENT -
BOYNTON INDUSTRIAL REALTY CORPORATION
FROM
Attached please find a copy of the above mentioned easement that was
recorded in Palm Beach County on December 18, 2000
~~<:2~--
C Development
Planning
Engineering
mas
\ \ch\main\shrdata\cc\wp\memos\mazzella.doc
r~-) -~^-i.-i
\ !'I L~'
\ iJ r--
, 1
", JAN 2 5
.--l
9543415961
718 Pl2l8
SEP 14 'l2ll2l 11 58
Dec-18-2888 8'3 31a. 00-482031
ORB 12202 Pg 1435
II. . UIII "IIUIH 11111111110 . H III II Ill.
..
~" City of Boynton Beach j
~~. lOO E Boynton Beach Blvd
i POBox 310
Boynton Beach,Fl 33425
J.
P'
EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE made this jg i, day of ~ A.D..).coo ,
by B~~ttaf1 J rtcl!{::,hld ~ 9 ~r~C4--+' (""I T:-rs
a corporation existing Wlder the laws of +Lo~ DIl
and having its principal place of business at _ (VJ;;\AJ VDi2:K
first part, to the City of Boynton Beach, B political subdivision of the State of
Florida, second party'
\ll
(Wherever used herc:in, the terms, "first party" and "second
party" shall include singular and plural, heirs. legal
representatives and assigns of individuals and the successors
and assigns of corporations, wherever the context so admits or
requires. )
WITNESSETH
-,
? C?~
~-<
c.- -<. c:>
~ -, -f'1
.... r- t?
<, ..J
<:
rv
N
Whereas, the first party is the owner of property situate in Palm Beach
-I
~ 0
~ ~:r;.
\..0 ~ :p
_r<1
(J'1 cJ ~
-.J 01cJ
:J:
County. Florida, and described as follows.
peN be - Y3 ---IS -I".... ~3-opo - ()~ 1/J
- 0"'1-
- tJ'fD
- D ?--OO
- 0,..2.0
Legal Description:
Si?1F ~ H-I(J JT
'A .,
and,
WHEREAS, the second party desires an easement for water and sewer utilities
and/or other appropriate purposes incidental thereto, on, over and across said
property,
and,
WHEREAS, the first party is willing to grant such an easement.
NOW. THEREFORE. for and in consideration of the mutual covenants each
to the other running and one dollar and other good and valuable
considerations, the first party does hereby grant unto the party of the second
part. its successors and assigns. full and free right and authority to construct,
maintain, repair, install and rebuild facilities for above stated purposes and
does hereby grant a perpetual easement on, over and across the above
described property for said purposes.
I' "
SEE ~1'11(frr .IS
I
I
i
f'
r
9543415961
718 Pl2l9
SEP 14 '121121 11 59
\
ORB 1. 2202: I='g 1. 436
I~
,.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the first party bas caused these presents to be duly
executed in it! name and its corporate seal to be hereto affIXed, attested by its ....
proper officers thereunto duly authorized, the day and year farst above written.
Signed, scaled and deJivered
in the presence of:
BY
ATTEST
"P .. As-s-r.
(CORPORATE SEAL)
WI N. ClNNAMOND, JR.
VICE PRESIDENT
STATE OF
NEW YORK
COUNTY OF
NEWYOFK
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day. before me, an officer duly
authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments,
personally appeared rYll C h 8- e I <; J. 0 cJ ~ Cr ru fir N
well known to me to be the \) I C f> President and
respectively, of the Corporation named as fU'st party in ~e foregoing
Easement and that they severally acknowledged executing the same in the
presence of two subscribing witnesses freely and volWltarily, wtder authority
duly vested in them by said Corporation, and that the seal affixed thereto is the
true Corporate seal of said Corporation.
WITNESS my hand and official 5,a1 ~ the County and State: last ,I / )
aforesaid this d-0l day of C!2-{' ~ A.D., 199..-~ (~/ /0 Pt ()(-
... e ,/,
Notary Public in arid for the
State and County aforesaid.
My commission expires:
GAll E. M. CAMPBELL
Notary PublIc. State 01 New y~
No. 41-4881347
n.~ it Queena County
eel. Fled m.... York Count)
~.II IIA ___ 08c. 22, 2000
,.
n
Cl ,-t
::::j-<
'- --<0
:P- -- ..,..,
~ )
-0
N T1Q
N -<
~ -.-
--'-
~ ('~
rj
~ -:.> x
I.D 11
...."c:o
<..n ~('"T1
"')1:;0
-J I " '"'
:r.
ORB 12202 Pg 1437
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTIONS 16. 17. 20 AND 21 TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH
RANGE 46 EAST. PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS
THE NORTH 25 FEET OF LOT 57, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF QUANTUM PARK AT
BOYNTON BEACH P I D . PLAT No 5, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 57. PAGES
189 THROUGH 190. AND LOTS 68-A, 68-B, 69, 70 AND 72. ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT OF QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH P I D , PLAT No 9,
AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 60. PAGES 32 THROUGH 33, ALL OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA
CONTAINING 721,308 SQUARE FEET. OR 16 56 ACRES. MORE OR LESS
-)
a -
(J-i
:::;-<
<- -<,-:::>
~ -J .,
- -r-J
N -:-,
N
--
> U> ;::'
::ii: ...~:..;;:
\.D -.t
....q CD
Con -rr1
(Jl>
-.J fT1(J
::c
Return to: (enclose self-addressed stamped envelope)
Name
Address:
ORB 12202 Pg 1438
co
u-
o
N
.....
W
W
:c
(/)
~~
o
I-~
OS
-./S
ea
NS6e49'OS-E
92.76'
503"10'52-E
27 13'
-7
-- 0
'-
- ?;:
- N
N
-
:oa
~
---
---
I
P.D.C.
SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF
LOT 72
-0
~ ~1
C.J
~
b:
LOT 57
"QUANTUM P ARK AT BOYNTON BEACH,
P 1.0. PLAT NO 5"
(PLAT BOOK 57 PAGES 189 AND 190)
SHEET 1 OF 6
U)
en
LEGEND NOTES 0')
P O. T - POINT OF TERMINUS
P O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P O.C.- POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
Ii B. - PLAT BOOK
PGS. - PAGES
U.E. - UTILITY EASEMENT
F.P.L.-FLORIDA POWER Be LIGHT
S.B. - SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE
Q.C.-QUANTUM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NO. -NUMBER
R.R.-RAIL ROAD
Q.P.B.B.-QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH
['-1
.-,
..:,:,::';'::
...~
'1
-r.::::l
-- lTi
"2):>
"r)
. CAULFIELD & WHEELER, INC
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - SURVEYING
."'730IA W PALMETTO PARK ROAD - SUITE 100A
..,. BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33433
PHONE (561)-392-1991 / FAX (561)-750-1452
DATE 10 5 00
DRAWN BY S.R.A.
F B / PG ------
SCALE AS SHOWN
JOB NO 3951
QUANTIJM PARK. PHASE 2 AT BOYNTON BEACH. P 1.0.
PLAT NO.9 - 12' ATER DISTRIBUllON EASEMENT
Return to: (enclose self-addressed stamped envelope)
Name
Address:
OF\B 12202 Pg 1439
s
N14~4'31-E
29.85'
~..
(j
~W
I5ClJ
l:J~ :t
~t-::.Q~
~ci~
~O~f:t
it llJ '- C/)
'- ~ tj
~~~~
~ ~ Q. :go
"'~ -: ~
~ o.:! POI
sJ ;
-.I~ ~
$
.0
Lor 7
aUILDIN '2
G II/
c.....-
~
-
N
N
-c..?
~'~
~ ~~/ en
..JJ- :'1'_, .. JT1
U) :J% JT1
(J\ n 'P'
cp fTln en
:J:::c
JT1
JT1
--i
N30-o9'12-W
8.42'
P.O. T.
~
S75.A9'
~ 41-
125.88' E:
N14~0'19-E
32.30'
575.49'41-E N86.49'OfE
7117' - 203.12
---
c')
--
1-
-0
-"
~-
-;;:J
-....
LEGEND NOTES
P O. T - POINT OF TERMINUS
P O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P O.C.- POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
P.B. - PLAT BOOK
PGS. - PAGES
U.E. - UTILITY EASEMENT
F P.l.-FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT
S.B. - SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE
Q.C.-QUANTUM COMMUNICATIONS. INC.
NO.-NUMBER
R.R.-RAIL ROAD
Q.P.B.B.-QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH
---
LOT 57 p;" ,:)
"QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON IiA~
P 1.0 PLAT NO.5" U1 n:p-
(PLAT BOOK 57 PAGES 189 AND 190) 0:1 r"~
--
SHEET 2 OF 6
. CAULFIELD & WHEELER, INC
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - SURVEYING
.....7301A W PALMETTO PARK ROAD - SUITE IOOA
.... . BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33433
PHONE (561)-392-1991 I FAX (561)-750-1452
DA TE 10 5 00
DRAWN BY S.R,A.
F B PG. ------
SCALE AS SHOWN
JOB NO 3951
QUANlUM PARK, PHASE 2 AT BOYNTON BEACH, P .1.0.
PLAT NO.9 - 12' A TER DISTRIBUTION EASEMENT
Return to: (enclose self-addressed stamped envelope)
Name
Of\B 12202 Pg 1440
Address:
LEGEND NOTES
P o. T - POINT OF TERMINUS
P O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P O.C,- POINT OF' COMMENCEMENT
P B. - PLAT BOOK
PGS. - PAGES
U.E. - UTILITY EASEMENT
F.P L.-FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT
S.B. - SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE
C.C.-QUANTUM COMMUNICATIONS. IN .
NO.-NUMBER
R.R. -RAIL ROAD
Q.P.B.B.-QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON
'-P. ~(i\
tJ' ~~
("'!') ,~
0)
(()
,......
o
-.I
-
;r: ..
(j
!1tw
f5ctj
(j~ fj
~J;:;~~
~ O' "<
~~ <:::{
it "'6J '- C/)
'- ~ &
~~~({
o IE ci g-
,,~.....:~
" a.. Q.: g
5J ;
-.J<: ~
~ POINT It JIt
.0
--
--
------ ~
--./
----
-
-
U)
rT'1
rT'1
U)
I
rT1
rT1
-t
R::=
(j
,......~
oS
-.IS
Q)
o
-rt
0')
. CAULFIELD & WHEELER, INC
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - SURVEYING
.....7301A W PALMETTO PARK ROAD - SUITE 100A
..,.. . BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33433
PHONE (561)-392-1991 / FAX (561)-750-1452
DATE
DRAWN BY S.R.A.
F B / PG. ------
SCALE AS SHOWN
JOB NO 3951
QUANl1JM PARK, PHASE 2 AT BOYNTON BEACH, P.I.D.
PLAT NO 9 - 12' A TER DISTRIBUTlON EASEMENT
Return to: (enclose self-addressed stamped envelope)
Name
Address:
ORB 12202 Pg 1441
0)
CO
I-.
o
-.I
----
/ ------
~ r -- --::::: --
--~
-- --
-- --
-- --
LEGEND NOTES -- -::::.. --
P O. T - POINT OF TERMINUS
P O.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING
P O.C.- POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
P B. - PLAT BOOK
PGS. - PAGES
U.E, - UTILITY EASEMENT
F.P l.-FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT
5:B. - SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE
Q.C.-QUANTUM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NO.-NUMBER
R.R.-RAIL ROAD
Q.P.B.B.-QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH
--
-
----
-
-
----
-
-
----
-
-
----
-
(0
l.J..
o
t")
I-
W
W
:J:
en
W
en
R22
()
I-.~
oS
-.15
QJ
- /
.
.I.,J
~:....
~cO
401...:
.0)
--
~
~ .........
."""0
ClJ~Ol
C/i':::>-
0'
. A:: 01
....j(jll:>
Q.Q:'-
,-' I.U CI)
....cc
.~Q.
w.....
.:::>u(;;
({) 0 ClJ
- .&
/
. CAULFIELD B WHEELER, INC
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - SURVEYING
....7301A W PALMETTO PARK ROAD - SUITE 100A
..,.. , BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33433
PHONE (561)-392-1991 I FAX (561)-750-1452
DATE
DRAWN BY
F" 8./ PG
S,R.A.
QUANTUM PARK. PHASE 2 AT BOYNTON BEACH. P.I.D
PLAT NO.9 - 12' AlER DISTRIBUTION EASEMENT
SCALE AS SHOWN
JOB NO 3951
Return to: (enclose self-addressed stamped envelope)
Name
OF\B 1. 2202 Pg 1. 442
Address:
~
~
f")
,,)
-n
'"'0'
~o
-;0-<'
... -...
-i
NOTE:
1 REPRODUCTIONS OF THIS SKETCH ARE NOT VALID UNLESS SEALED WITH AN EMBOSSED ~
cJ
SURVEYOR'S SEAL. ...,,; :c
2 LANDS SHOWN HEREON ARE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS,
OWNERSHIP, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD
3. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO THE RECORD PLAT BASED ON THE EAST LINE
OF LOTS 70 AND 72, BEARING N14'10'59"E.
4 THE "LAND DESCRIPTION" HEREON WAS PREPARED BY THE SURVEYOR
5 DATA SHOWN HEREON WAS COMPILED FROM THE INSTRUMENT OF RECORD AND DOES NOT
CONSTITUTE A FIELD SURVEY AS SUCH
DESCRIPTION: 12' WATER DISTRIBUTION EASEMENT
A PORTION OF A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTIONS 16 AND 17, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH,
RANGE 46 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS.
LOTS 70 AND 72, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF "QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH P I D ,
PLA T NO 9", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 60, PAGES 32 AND 33 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 72, THENCE N14'10'59"E, ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 72. A DISTANCE OF 21605 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE
N7541'50"W, A DISTANCE OF 5269 FEET TO POINT "A", THENCE N14'18'10"E, A DISTANCE OF
55.01 FEET TO POINT "B", THENCE N7541'02"W, A DISTANCE OF 85.26 FEET, THENCE
S7840'58"W, A DISTANCE OF 27 27 FEET, THENCE N7545'29"W, A DISTANCE OF 132.88 FEET
TO POINT "C", THENCE N7545'29"W, A DISTANCE OF 1245 FEET TO POINT "D", THENCE
N7545'29"W, A DISTANCE OF 3063 FEET TO POINT "E", THENCE N7545'29"W, A DISTANCE OF
14851 FEET, THENCE N54"10'06"W, A DISTANCE OF 29 51 FEET, THENCE N76"26'30"W, A
DISTANCE OF 3895 FEET TO POINT "F", THENCE S14'07'14"W, A DISTANCE OF 292.90 FEET,
THENCE S30"09'12"E, A DISTANCE OF 8.42 FEET TO POINT "G", THENCE S30"09'12"E, A
DISTANCE OF 2081 FEET, THENCE S75"48'41"E, A DISTANCE OF 125.88 FEET TO POINT "H",
THENCE S7549'41"E, A DISTANCE OF 71 17 FEET, THENCE N8649'08"E, A DISTANCE OF 203.12
FEET TO POINT "I", THENCE N8649'08"E, A DISTANCE OF 92.76 'FEET, THENCE N14"18'10"E, A
DISTANCI!: OF 171 20 FEET TO POINT "A",
BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT "B", THENCE S7541 02"E, A DISTANCE OF 2303 FEET,
THENCE N58"39'05"E, A DISTANCE OF 1351 FEET TO POINT OF TERMINUS.
CAULFIELD B WHEELER, INC
.W CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - SURVEYING
730lA W PALMETTO PARK ROAD - SUITE IOOA
BOCA RATON. FLORIDA 33433
PHONE (561)-392-1991 / FAX (561)-750-1452
SHEET 5 OF 6
DATE 10/5/00
DRAWN BY S.R.A.
F B / PG ------
SCALE AS SHOWN
JOB NO 3951
QUANlUM PARK, PHASE 2 AT BOYNTON BEACH, P J.D.
PLAT NO.9 - 12' WATER DISTRIBUllON EASEMENT
Retum to: (enclose self-addressed stamped envelope)
Name
Address:
ORB 12202 Pg 1443
DOROTHY Ho WILKEN, CLERK PB COUNTY, FL
c) -.
-I
, -/ .::
'-
-!..~
....,
, .... n,.-..
;D. ~~
:r C/) -i
0
1.0 ~2:
(-'1
BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT "B", THENCE N14018'10"E, A DISTANCE OF 30 96 rEEr;' ,THENCE
N58057'04"E, A DISTANCE OF 2063 FEET, THENCE N14059'12"E, A DISTANCE OF 19764 FEET TO
A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF A 12 FOOT WATER DISTRIBUTION EASEMENT,
AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK PAGES OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH
COUNTY, FLORIDA AND POINT OF TERMINUS.
BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT "C", THENCE N14014'31"E, A DISTANCE OF 4913 FEET, THENCE
N7545'29"W, A DISTANCE OF 3404 FEET, THENCE N14014'31"E, A DISTANCE OF 32.11 FEET TO
POINT OF TERMINUS.
BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT "D", THENCE S14014'31"W, A DISTANCE OF 2460 FEET TO
POINT OF TERMINUS.
BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT "E", THENCE S14014'31"W, A DISTANCE OF 2985 FEET TO
POINT OF TERMINUS.
BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT "F", THENCE N14007'14"E, A DISTANCE OF 52.87 FEET TO
POINT "J", THENCE N14007'14"E, A DISTANCE OF 19112 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH
THE CENTERLINE OF A 12 FOOT WATER DISTRIBUTION EASEMENT, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL
RECORDS BOOK ,PAGES OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA AND
POINT OF TERMINUS.
BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT "J", THENCE S75052'46"E, A DISTANCE OF 28.32 FEET TO
POINT OF TERMINUS.
BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT "G", THENCE N59050'48"E, A DISTANCE OF 20.78 FEET TO
POINT OF TERMINUS.
BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT "H", THENCE S14010'19"W, A DISTANCE OF 32.30 FEET TO
POINT OF TERMINUS.
BEGINNING AT AFORESAID POINT "I", THENCE NOS10'52"W, A DISTANCE OF 2713 FEET TO
POINT OF TERMINUS.
THE SIDELINES OF SAID EASEMENT SHOULD BE LEGHTENED OR SHORTENED TO INTERSECT WITH
THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 72 AND SAID 12 FOOT WATER DISTRIBUTION EASEMENT, WHERE
APPLICABLE.
CERTlFICA TE:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION OF THE HEREON DESCRIBED
PROPERTY IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AS PREPARED
UNDER MY DIRECTION ON OCTOBER 5, 2000 I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETCH OF
DESCRIPTION MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 61G17-6
ADOPTED BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS~ PURSUANT TO FLORIDA
STA TUTES 472.027
CAULFIELD B WHEELER. INC
.W CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE - SURVEYING
730lA W PALMETTO PARK ROAD - SUITE IOOA
BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33433
PHONE (561)-392-1991 / FAX (561)-750-1452
., ,J7J~ll.-'l
..
.OC Y(~. \ A~~ER
e'cl TEliED LANe
ISURVEYOR NO 5302
STATE OF FLORIDA
L.B. 3591
SHEET 6 OF 6
DATE 10/5/00
DRAWN BY S.R.A.
F B / PG. ------
QUANlUM PARK, PHASE 2 AT BOYNTON BEACH, P.loD
PLAT N009 - 12' WATER DIS1RIBUTlON EASEMENT
SCALE
JOB NO
AS SHOWN
3951
--4
~ TYPtNG .......15 :>CCUMENT A.:;F!IA......:. ~ET'J?..~ AND
T" -:;)!: :H>=I:OUGH T!-olE -i.H~C'::c.:: .~~- 3()A=S
FLORIDA DEPARTl\IENT OF REVE~lTE .
1111
--r----~ -~--- --
C':';::iC=_
CE-=:----.
tJ
r--~L 3c~
----
=~~
~-~
D~jO
S "'-HIS T8,j, ~s~c- -::~J j,
SP'_'T OR CUTOL - "'i'icr.l
AJjOT",ER PARCEL? ~
.-~D
~~
~
lCj,:J
2 S"'-'-- S -\ 1 _
TqA.'~:S.A_C-:- C j
............---=
3
-' -
GRA 'JTO~ f3 0 y IV T 0 tV Z AI (J w. J Irk I 4- i I{ t;- 11- L T y k: foj~
"- -A
PHmjE ( ) C2RPC~A TE I j ~ !
\,0 1 j
J~\1E ,
I C. - ~ 1
GRANEE - Y () f' B y III rr N 11 j
I I { D 0 G:. ,(/ Co H 1 ,
STREET , 0 0 ,- 1/ 0 y tV T ~ La L ~ I i
, ADDRESS C 0 ~ #- c" ~ d V
!CITYSTATE ~ 0 y ,.J T () tV ~ ~ 4 c, /I F t- ZIP 1 ;/ '1 r - ~-tLrn
I CODE Y
PHONE ( ~- 6 I ) 11 '1 2. 6 0 0 CORP'JRA TE 1 I
NO (J NAME
.,.- - -- ,
l'>
=
'1::l........Q
4
I
I
i
5.1
I
, I
DA, E OF ::>AL:.TRANS-",R
~/$
'.1.::nlh :Ja.... (':>''1.
PROPERTY LOCATED !Nrn COL~JT' _::-' 'JA
I
6.1 TYPE OF DOCUMENT
I
I TO THE BEST OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE, WERE THERE UNUSUAL CiRCUMSTANCES OR CONDITIONS TO THE SALE, rv'ARK X) 8Y -,.,OS" ,-.."'- _;0<::.. v
I
..
Warranty
Deed
o
Quit Claim 0
Deed
Contract / Agreement 0
for Deed
Other l2S]
"'Ie ""leo" B ~~."'~ B -~Ie~I~B S""'''"''" B
7 under Duress by Court Order
Mineral Rights Foreclosure SalelTransfer of a Other
Partial or Undivided Interest ( No EXPlanation)
Needed
I Agricultural I Institutional/
8,1 Property Type: Residential Commercial Industrial Miscellaneous : Government Vacant Acreage
0 ~ I ~ Di 0 0 0 0
' Mark (Xl those
that apply ,
I
I TO THE BEST OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE.
9 : WAS ~f\;USUAL PE>1S0~.AL ..
I PROPEI'lTY ~,C,-..:D~J N -HE SALE?
I
10.:
I
I
'1 IF ITEM NUMBER 1\)5 ZERO" IS DEED EXEMPT FROM DOCUMENTARY lli]/'D
' 'I STAMP TAX UNDER 52) 02'61 FLORIDA STATUTES?
I' YES NO
O 118] IF 'YES" PLEASE STATE THE
YES / NO :~AMOUNTATTRI8UTA8LETO ~ $
I THE PERSONAL PROPERTY
I
AMOUNT OF DOCLMENTARY STAMPS TO BE AFFIXED TO DOCUMENT?
..
$
jWAS PROPERTY
IIMPROVED
112. WITH BUILDINGIS) AT
: TIME OF SALE?
YES~ 0 NO
" HEREBY CERTIFY THA T THIS RETURN HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY ME AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWELDGE AND BELIEF IS A TRUE AND COMPLETE RETURN~
S gr3....re Jt G'anr')r :3 3rtee Gr:]l1lee A.gent
D3~e
~ 'NAF~.'\i!'VG F~'Lu'.gE ""'0 ~':"E ThIS qE~UR.'V SHALL RESUL T iN A PENAL TV OF 525 JO IN ADDITION TO ANY On-fE.R PENAL TV :,VPOSEO BY ~HE ~E\IE\iuE .J ~S ::F c: C.==?,c.j
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT'S OFFICE CLERK'S DATE STAMP
~
Ir
DATE BOOK & PAGE NO 'I
· OR FILE NO RECORDED ! \.
....
'OR BOOK ~
AND
PAGE NUMBER ~
-----,
llAND
i
. FILE NUMBER
/ !
~'11o"t!'1 Day y ~3r
'CLERKS OFFICE TO RETAIN WHITE COPY FOR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REPRESENTATIVES SEND CANARY COpy TO PROPERTY APPRAISER"
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING It DEVELOPME. BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 27, 1999
applicant is providing in the first phase is 100% of the dry pretreatment required to be
constructed in the first phase. South Florida Water Management District has already issued the
applicant a permit for that work. In Phase II, the applicant would connect the "T" and extend
the line to provide service with hydrants and meters.
Condition #7 - "Remove proposed median cut on Quantum Lakes Drive and
install "Right Turn Only" sign at exit, or close existing median
opening to the east at Lot 59 and replace with proposed
opening Proposed opening is too close to existing opening at
Lot 59 to ensure safe and proper design The existing median
opening at Lot 59 should be moved to the eastern end of Lot 59
if properly designed with adjoining intersection This relocation
should be done in conjunction with the ultimate development of
Lot 59 "
Mr Lee advised that the original median cuts were set up on the original master plan using
outdated plan criteria that allowed one median cut with two access points side-by-side. The
applicant would prefer to open the median section, relocate the trees, have the median cut
serve one side and leave the existing median cut to serve Lot 59
Mr Barber advised that Ray Davidson-is standing firm on his recommendation with respect to
the median There is a split entrance for the two lots (Lots 58 & 59). There is a situation of
safety and welfare for the people traveling on this road. There is also a safety issue with the
turn lane. Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer is concerned about how the turn lane will work.
Staff recommends carrying the median down, carrying the turn lane down and making an
entrance for Lot 58.
At the board members' request, Mr Barber explained that on Quantum Lakes Drive, the existing
drive splits between the two lots. Lot 59 has two entries and the only entry for Lot 58 is the
split drive. The applicant wants to establish a stand-alone with its own driveway entrance and
Lot 59 will have its own driveway closer to the intersection. The traffic lanes are supplied with
the turn lane. The applicant would like to break the median and allow the cars to enter through
another median without a turn lane supplied on that median.
Staff is recommending that the applicant close off the median between Lots 58 and 59, carry
the existing turn lane down across from Lot 59 so that the configuration of median just opposite
Lot 58 resembles the configuration of the median that is already established.
Mr Gerlica said the applicant's objection is to the elimination of the median opening and
modifications to the existing median opening. The applicant would prefer that the condition be
rewritten or deleted to allow him to provide the median opening as shown and to leave the
existing median as it currently exists. The applicant is making this request for the following
reasons:
1 Any further improvement reduces the flexibility of what to do on the second half
of Lot 58 because this is a phased project.
12
MEETING MINUTES
PlANNING 8& DEVELOP 'IT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 27,1999
2. At build out, the applicant projects the traffic on the roadway to be 2,500 trips.
The capacity on a four-lane divided roadway is 31,100 trips. If this is
compounded with the traffic using the two lanes that are westbound accessing
Lots 52, 58 and 59 and with access to Lot 59, the only traffic that will be going
past the opening is traffic that will make a left-turn entrance into Lot 58,
With respect to safety, if the applicant provides the median opening where it
currently exists, all the U-turns will be eliminated
3 By leaving the existing median opening, conflicts with cars traveling eastbound
that would have to make a U-turn would be eliminated
Mr Rosenstock referred to Item #2 on the "Facts and Issues Regarding the Proposed Median
Opening for Lot 58" sheet provided by Mr Gerlica and pointed out that if the following fact was
true, there was no reason for debating the issue. (A copy of the sheet is attached to the
original set of these minutes on file in the City Clerk's Office) Item #2 read as follows.
"717e POA transferred title to the CDO with reservations. 717e reservation being
the developer, Quantum Umitet:l Partners, reserved the right to modify the
roadway at their discretion. #
Mr Rosenstock recommended that staff review the a,greement.
Mr Barber explained that this is an agreement that allows the chaAge to the master plan. He
said staff agrees with most of what Mr Gerlica spoke about. However, staff is not in
agreement with where the tum lane should be, or whether there should even be a tum lane at
that entrance.
Mr Gerlica reminded the members that a four-lane divided roadway does not require a
dedicated deceleration lane because the speed does not exist on this roadway and there is an
ability of using the right-hand lane to get around the person making t;he left tum. In this area,
there will be very little through-traffic.
Mr Barber explained that we have a conflict because the aty does not have a Traffic Engineer
Therefore, even if staff feels this recommendation would be satisfactory, we might not be able
to make that judgment.
Mr Friedland feels the applicant's plan is a safer, better and quicker plan. Chairman Wische
and Ms. Frazier agreed with Mr Friedland.
CHAIRMAN WISCHE ANNOUNCED THE PUBUC HEARING. THERE WAS NO ONE PRESENT WHO
WISHED TO SPEAK ON THIS APPUCATlON.
Mr Barber said the Planning Department would like consent from Palm Beach County that this
is a safe situation and altering the master plan would not conflict with any issues in the future.
13
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING It DEVELOP" T BOARD
I;lOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 21, 1999
. Mr Friedland requested that staff not forget about standardizing the Sign Code.
Vice Chairman Dube pointed out that the Director of Development was the leader of the
proposed Sign Code amendments. When he left, the project stalled Ms. Byrne will follow up
on this project to check on its status.
Mr Rosenstock advised that the previous Director of Development secured samples from major
sign companies. His intention was to prepare a booklet/brochure depicting the signs that would
be acceptable in the City However, all of the signs were of a particular character that did not
give the developers a wide-enough choice He recommended that staff find the information
and use it as a starting base.
. Mr Rosenstock reminded staff that there was a recommendation from the Planning &.
Development Board to the previous Commission that the Code be amended to require every
developer to include letters of a particular size showing the street number of the building so
that the traveling public does not have to stop abruptly to locate a particular address.
. Mr Myott reported that he received a telephone call from the Sun-Sentinel regarding the
expansion of Showlime. No one else on the board had received a call
10. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come b~fore the board, the meeting properly adjourned at
8.50 p.m.
d:;~;n~
Deputy City Clerk
(Three Tapes)
4/30/99 3:05 PM
15
MOCK~.~OOS .
....' ~ .~
ENGINEERS .~~~U!}~EYO~;~llLANNERS
Facts and Issues reeardine the Proposed Median Openin~ for Lot 58
Subject:
Quantum Park Lot 58
(OUf Ref No. 9900800)
1 Quantum Lakes Dnve IS a pnvate road by Plat dedicatIon.
2 The POA transferred title to the CDD WIth reservatIons. The reservation being the
developer, Quantum Limited Partners, reserved the right to modify the roadway at their
dIscretion.
3 The roadway by definition is a local street.
4 Local streets are not reqUired to be divided roadways or have medians. Medians are
desirable on higher speed, larger volume roadway facihties such as, collector roads and
arterial roads.
5 The speed of a roadway dictates the medIan width.
6 Median opemngs are recommended to be placed at mtervals convement for crossmg
movements and safety of the collector or artenal facility Quantum Lakes Dnve is
constructed as a four (4) lane divided roadway There are two (2) lanes in each directIon,
24 feet of pavement and a 16 foot landscaped median. This roadway was constructed to
this cross section to provide the boulevard appearance. This is purely an aesthetic
enhancement to thIs roadway It is not required by any design criteria of AASTO or the
State of Florida.
7 Median openings could be provided at each dnveway accessing each lot, WIth or without
deceleration lanes.
8 It is important to note that westbound traffic on Quantum Lakes Drive west of Quantum
Boulevard, as a practical matter, will only be traffic accessing Lots 52, 58 and 59 That
total traffic is further reduced by the available access to Lot 59 at the Quantum Lakes Drive
and Quantum Boulevard intersection.
9 The application of Palm Beach County Access Management Standards and Turn-Lane
Requirements are inappropriate for the proposed development, the roadway length and the
proposed median cut.
10 The landowner for Lot 58 is the same landowner for Lot 59 The landowner prefers to
leave the existing median openings as they are and install the proposed median opemng to
provIde flexibility m marketing and developing Lot 59 and the Phase II development within
Lot 58
Prepared by Eugene A. Gerlica, P.E.
AprIl 27, 1999
Letters.q Ipl.q Iplqu5 8' 99008 .00'1023egjh.doc
Mock, Roos II Associate., Inc.
5720 Corporate Way West Palm Beach. Florida 334072066. (561) 683-3113. fox 478-7248
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING. DEVELOP' - ~T BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLOR..JA
APRIL 27,1999
Ms. Cottrell questioned whether the motion included the deletion of Condition #16. The
response from Chairman Wische was affirmative.
C. SITE PLANS
New Site Plan
1 Project Name
Agent:
Owner'
"- Location
.....
Description
Lot 58 Quantum Park PID
Winston Lee, Winston Lee & Associates
MFT Development Inc.
Quantum Lakes Drive
(Quantum Park PID, Lot #58)
Request site plan approval to construct a 51,556
square-foot office building in two phase,S on 4 93
acres
Winston Lee, 1532 Old Okeechobee Road, West Palm Beach, said there were three
conditions he wished to discuss. He introduced Eugene Gerlica, Project Engineer from Mock
Roos.
Condition #5 - "=a note to the Paving and Drainage plan stating that all
pro sed st<lrm drainage structures and pipes in Phase II will be
con cted with Phase i."
Condition #6 - "Add ~ote to the Wastewater and Water plan stating that all
proposec:t.~ater and sewer lines in Phase II will be constructed
with Phase\~."
\
Mr Lee darified the meaning of ~ese conditions. These conditions require the ultimate
buildout. The applicant would like ~ ~ able to phase the project. The retention area
(Condition #5) would be able to su~lIy handle all water quality issues of the entire
buildout within Phase I. With respect to. Condition #6, there is a looped pressurized water
system that is completely self-contained an~ can stand on its own.
\
The applicant would like to be permitted to Ph~ the stormwater and water and sewer service.
\
Mr Barber said he had not seen the plans but feels the concern is that Phase II might not
become a reality. Mr Barber agreed that if the applicant had calculations for storing all the
water for the site, he would not be opposed to the applicant's request. Mr Lee and Mr Gerlica
confirmed that the applicant meets those standards.
Mr Gerllca advised that he met with Ray Davidson to discuss his comments. With respect to
the phasing issues, he was satisfied with the applicant's presentation. Mr Gerllca said it was
his understanding that these comments would not be induded on the staff report for this board
meeting. Mr Davidson was satisfied with the issues of phasing the water main and looping it
for Phase I. With respect to the water management of the dry pretreatment, what the
\
\
11
/
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING. .. DEVELOPMEh. SOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
't-
\
"
'>
APRIL 27, 1999
...
__ ;applicant is providing in the first phase is 100% of the dry pretreatment required to be
constructed in the first phase. South Florida Water Management District has already issued the
applicant a permit for that work. In Phase II, the applicant would connect the "T" and extend
the line to provide service with hydrants and meters.
Condition #7 - "Remove proposed median cut on Quantum Lakes Drive and
\A. \ install "Right Turn Only" sign at exit, or close existing median
j. 0 ~ ~ opening to the east at Lot 59 and replace with proposed
I 0.J"0-\f") \-.. ~ \ opening Proposed opening is too close to existing opening at
~ "I.. iJ;.yI Lot 59 to ensure safe and proper design The existing median
~ v..e opening at Lot 59 should be moved to the eastern end of Lot 59
if properly designed with adjoining intersection This relocation
should be done in conjunction with the ultimate development of
Lot 59 "
Mr Lee advised that the original median cuts were set up on the original master plan using
outdated plan criteria that allowed one median cut with two access points side-by-side. The
applicant would prefer to open the median section, relocate the trees, have the median cut
serve one side and leave the existing median cut to serve Lot 59
Mr Barber advised that Ray Davidson-is standing firm on his recommendation with respect to
the median There is a split entrance for the two lots (Lots 58 & 59). There is a situation of
safety and welfare for the people traveling on this road. There is also a safety issue with the f
turn lane. ,~~"-ty Iraf!!f ~ngin~r~_.f9_1'I~~!11ed atlo~t ~ow~~t!Ji!'Llane \4{i11 work.__
Staff recommends carrying the median down, carrying the turn lane down and making an A
entrance for Lot 58.
At the board members' request, Mr Barber explained that on Quantum Lakes Drive, the existing
drive splits between the two lots. Lot 59 has two entries and the only entry for Lot 58 is the
split drive. The applicant wants to establish a stand-alone with its own driveway entrance and
Lot 59 will have its own driveway closer to the intersection. The traffic lanes are supplied with
the turn lane. The applicant would like to break the median and allow the cars to enter through
another median without a turn lane supplied on that median
Staff is recommending that the applicant dose off the median between Lots 58 and 59, carry
the existing turn lane down across from Lot 59 so that the configuration of median just opposite
Lot 58 resembles the configuration of the median that is already established.
Mr Gerlica said the applicant's objection is to the elimination of the median opening and
modifications to the existing median opening. The applicant would prefer that the condition be
rewritten or deleted to allow him to provide the median opening as shown and to leave the
existing median as it currently exists. The applicant is making this request for the following
reasons.
1. Any further improvement reduces the flexibility of what to do on the second half
of Lot 58 because this is a phased project.
12
MEEnNG MINUTES
PLANNING a. DEVELOPMEr ~OARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
APRIL 27,1999
2. At build out, the applicant projects the traffic on the roadway to be 2,500 trips.
The capacity on a four-lane divided roadway is 31,100 trips. If this is
compounded with the traffic using the two lanes that are westbound accessing
Lots 52, 58 and 59 and with access to Lot 59, the only traffic that will be going
past the opening is traffic that will make a left-turn entrance into Lot 58,
With respect to safety, if the applicant provides the median opening where it
currently exists, all the U-turns will be eliminated
3 By leaving the existing median opening, conflicts with cars traveling eastbound
that would have to make a U-turn would be eliminated
Mr Rosenstock referred to Item #2 on the "Facts and Issues Regarding the Proposed Median
Opening for Lot 58" sheet provided by Mr Gerlica and pointed out that if the following fact was
true, there was no reason for debating the issue. (A copy of the sheet is attached to the
original set of these minutes on file in the City Clerk's Office.) Item #2 read as follows
"The POA transferred title to the CDD with reservations. The reservation being
the developer, Quantum Umited Partners, reserved the n'ght to modify the
roadway at their discretion. n
Mr RQsenstock recommended that staff review the agreement.
Mr Barber explained that this is an agreement that allows the change to the master plan He
said staff agrees with most of what Mr Gerlica spoke about. However, staff is not in
agreement with where the turn lane should be, or whether there should even be a turn lane at
that entrance.
Mr Gerlica reminded the members that a four-lane divided roadway does not require a
dedicated deceleration lane because the speed does not exist on this roadway and there is an
ability of using the right-hand lane to get around the person making the left turn. In this area,
there will be very little through-traffic.
Mr Barber explained that we have a conflict because the City does not have a Traffic Engineer
Therefore, even if staff feels this recommendation would be satisfactory, we might not be able
to make that judgment.
Mr Friedland feels the applicant's plan is a safer, better and quicker plan Chairman Wische
and Ms. Frazier agreed with Mr Friedland.
CHAIRMAN WISCHE ANNOUNCED THE PUBUC HEARING. THERE WAS NO ONE PRESENT WHO
WISHED TO SPEAK ON THIS APPUCATION
Mr Barber said the Planning Department would like consent from Palm Beach County that this
is a safe situation and altering the master plan would not conflict with any issues in the future.
13
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING & DEVELOPM-'T BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORL.A.
\
\
APRIL 27,1999
Mr Gerlica objected to this recommendation because the applicant's proposal meets Palm
Be~ch County standards. What was reported to him through the representatives of the City
engineers is that they are applying Palm Beach County standards that do not apply to the
condition This is a local street with low volume and low speed. It is not a thoroughfare or
collector road ~~unty does not have a requiremen_Uo!~~C~~S management on a
local street. ----------.-- -- . ..
---.--'
Chairman Wische felt this was similar to any private street in a private development in Palm
Beach County Vice Chairman Dube questioned the difference between the roadway in question
and any street in Hunters Run He pointed out that the County has nothing to say about the
roads in Hunters Run
Motion
Vice Chairman Dube moved that we approve the request for site plan approval to construct a
51,556 square-foot office building in two phases on 493 acres for MFf Development, Inc.,
subject to all staff comments with the deletion of Conditions #5, 6 and 7 as presented Ms.
Frazier seconded the motion that carried unanimously -
8. OTHER
None
9. COMMENTS BY MEMBERS
y . Chairman Wische recommended that a workshop meeting be scheduled with the City
Commissioners.
Mr Rosenstock said he would like the City Attorney's Office to provide the board members with
information as to their legal status as a board with respect to suggestions to the Commission
and votes. The status report should be presented to all new board members each year so that
everyone has a clear understanding of the board's duties and responsibilities and the
consequences of those actions. Mr Rosenstock would like this information prior to the
workshop meeting.
Vice Chairman Dube reminded the members that the Ordinance that was changed
approximately two years ago defined the board's duties and responsibilities. He questioned
whether or not the Commissioners were aware of the Ordinance. Vice Chairman Dube recalled
times when the Commission sent applicants back to the Planning & Development Board. He
feels the new Commissioners are not aware of that process.
With the board's direction, Attorney Cirullo will provide a simple outline of what the Ordinance
provides with ,respect to authority and rights. He feels a workshop would provide an
opportunity for open discussion on roles and responsibilities.
14
-~---,-----~--------- ~--