Loading...
LEGAL APPROVAL %e City of tJ3oynton ~eacli 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Bead/. 'Boulevard P.D 'Bo{.310 'Boynton 'Bead/., :Jlorida 33425-0310 City:Jfa[[. (407) 375-6000 :JJU. (407) 375-6090 CERTIFICATION I, Suzanne M. Kruse, City Clerk of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, do hereby certify that attached Ordinance #096-33, consisting of six (6) pages, Exhibit "A" two (2) pages, and Exhibit "B" one (1) page is a true and correct copy as it appears in the records of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. WITNESS, my hand and the corporate seal of the CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, this 26th of July, 1996. ~~~~ Suz nne M. Kruse, CMC/AAE City Clerk July 26,1996 s: \cc: \ wp \cerlifyj 51mema s (jateway to tfu (julfstream ORDINANCE NO 96-~~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A DETERMINATION THAT CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT APPROVED IN ORDINANCE NO 84-51, AND AMENDED IN ORDINANCES NOS 86-11, 86- 37, 88-3, 94-10 AND 94-51, DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION UNDER CHAPTER 380 06, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1996, DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW IS NECESSARY REGARDING SUCH CHANGES, APPROVING SUCH CHANGES, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ORDINANCE NOS 84-51, 86-11, 86-37, 88- 3, 94-10 AND 94-51) FOR PURPOSES OF INCORPORATING THE APPROVED CHANGES, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, Riteco Development Corporation, a Florida corporation ("Riteco") filed with the City of Boynton Beach (the "City") an Application for Development Approval of Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact (the "ADA") on May 21, 1984, regarding that certain property (the "Property") described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the ADA was approved and the Development Order for the Property was granted December 18, 1984 and pursuant to Ordinance No 84-51 (the "Development Order"); and WHEREAS, Riteco subsequently conveyed its right, titles and interest in and to the Property to Boynton Park of Commerce, Inc , a Florida corporation ("Boynton Park"), and, Boynton Park, in turn, subsequently conveyed its right, title and interest in and to the Property to Quantum Associates, a Florida general partnership (the "Developer") and WHEREAS, Developer filed with the City respective applications to amend the Development Order, which applications were approved by the City in Ordinance No 86-11, Ordinance No 86-37, Ordinance No 88-3, Ordinance No 94-10, and Ordinance 94-51; and WHEREAS, the term "Development Order" includes all amendments thereto and WHEREAS, Quantum Associates, a Florida general partnership ("Developer") is the current owner and developer of the remaining vacant land within the project commonly known as Quantum Corporate Park at Boynton Beach Development of Regional Impact (sometimes hereinafter called the "Quantum Park DRI"); and WHEREAS, Developer has submitted to the City a Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("NOPC") requesting a further amendment to the Development Order for the purpose of revising the Master Site Development Plan to reflect the addition of Lots 80, 81 and 82 to the DRI and to include commercial use as a permitted land use for certain additional lots (lots 65A, 65B, 67B, 76,77,78,79 and 91) within Quantum Park and delete commercial use as a permitted land use for lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62 within Quantum Park (see attached Exhibit "B" - Amended Master Site Development Plan); and WHEREAS, the City Commission of Boynton Beach, as the governing body having jurisdiction, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for amendments to development orders approving developments of regional impact pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996); and WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered the testimony, reports and other documentary evidence submitted at said public hearing by Developer, the City staff and the public, and the City Planning and Development Board's recommendations of the 25th day of June, 1996; and WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered all of the foregoing NOW THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Commission of Boynton Beach, that said City Commission makes the following findings of fact Section 1 A notice of public hearing in the proceedings was duly published on the 17th day of June, 1996, in The Post, a newspaper of general circulation in Boynton Beach, Florida, pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes, and proof of said pUblication has been duly filed in these proceedings -2- I I' II / I Section 2 Developer has requested that the Development !i I, i I Order be amended to include the following provisions 1 Lots 80, 81 and 82 as per the plat of P C 0 Center, Plat Book 60, Pages 106 and 107, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, are hereby added and incorporated into the Quantum Park DRI 2 Master Plan Amendment No 6 to the Master Site Development Plan for Quantum Park dated July 1, 1996, is hereby approved 3 In accordance with the analysis of the intersection of Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc dated April 9, 1996, as modified by Supplemental Analysis dated June 10, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference, the following intersection improvements shall be constructed at such time as that portion of the project served by Park Ridge Road exceeds the following trip generation levels a 1,200 P m peak hour trips restripe the southbound approach for dual lefts and a i I II ! i I combination through/right turn lane b 1,300 P m peak hour trips construct an additional right-turn lane on the northbound approach to provide dual right-turns c 1,935 p m peak hour trips - add a southbound through lane and separate out the through/right into a through and right-turn only lane The Developer shall not proceed with development of that portion of the project served by Park Ridge Boulevard which would generate in excess of 2,300 p m peak hour trips without further review of the operating characteristics of saiQ intersection and approval by the City, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the Department of Community Affairs -3- ,: I i I I i I ! 4 Concurrently with the submittal of a site plan application for any lot designated commercial pursuant to the Master Site Development Plan (regardless of whether the proposed use is commercial or another permitted land use), the applicant shall indicate in writing to the City the number of PM peak hour vehicle trips estimated to be generated by the proposed building improvement and also the aggregate peak hour trip generation for all lots served by Park Ridge Boulevard 5 Wi th respect to any commercial development along Gateway Boulevard, the following conditions shall apply a There shall be no increase in the number of free- standing signs than is currently permitted (i e one per lot; additional lots created beyond the number of lots that currently exists as of the adoption date of this ordinance shall not be entitled to their own freestanding sign and must share freestanding signage with an adjacent lot) b There shall be no increase in the number of access points on to Gateway Boulevard than currently anticipated (i e addi tional lots created beyond the number of lots that currently exists as of the adoption date of this ordinance shall not be entitled to their own access point and must share access through cross access with an adjacent lot) c Landscaping shall be installed in excess of that required by the landscaping code in effect as of the adoption date of this ordinance The extent of the supplemental landscaping required shall be determined at the time of site plan review for the first commercial lot along Boulevard Gateway -4- 'I I ji submitted for review after the adoption date of ordinance The supplemental this landscaping determined to be required for this first commercial lot shall establish the landscaping standard required for subsequent commercial lots along Gateway Boulevard 6 Where square footage is used to evaluate traffic generated by a given land use, gross floor area shall be used, with the exception of commercial use which shall be evaluated using gross leasable area 7 The sewage lift station serving Park Ridge Boulevard shall be upgraded at Quantum's expense at such time as development generates sewer flow in excess of the lift station capacity as determined by the city's Utilities Department Section 3 Upon consideration of all matters described in Section 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996) , it is hereby determined that ! do not amendments proposed by Developer A The I I II I 'I I ,I 1\ unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to this area B The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations C The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council on file in these proceedings D The amendments proposed by Developer do not conBtitute a substantial deviation under Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes (1996) Section 4 The City Commission has concluded as a matter of law that these proceedings have be~n duly conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380 06, Florida StatuteB (1996), that Developer is entitled to the relief prayed and applied for, and that the Development Order is hereby amended -5- Ii 'I I ! I incorporating the amendments proposed by Developer as set I II I forth in Section 2 above I Section 5 Except as otherwise amended herein, the I Development Order shall remain in full force and effect FIRST READING this 2nd day of July, 1996 SECOND READING and FINAL PASSAGE this /tb day of J';~~ , 1996 CITY 4 MISSIONER ~~~/ COMMISSIONER ~ J ~!~ CO~SIONER I ATTEST / / ;;~/~~~ , CI~ CLERK i i (Corporate Seal) 'i :, ,I EXHIBITS "A" "B" - Legal Description - Amended Master Site Development Plan I I !: i i I I' I -6- EXHIBIT "A" (J 16 / 3 3 - - OVBRALL BOUNDARY LEGAL DESCRIPTION A Tract of land lyln9 partially in 'ection. ,., 11, ~o and al, Town.hip 41 eouth, ~.nve .3 .a.t, Pal. Beacb County, florida, said Tract beina .ore particularlr de.G~ibed .. lo11oW8' Co...nain, .. the 80uehwe.e Gorner of .aid Sectton 17; thence North 10..... 39" lalt, alona tbe Weet libe of aection 11, a dt.tanc. at 1311.10 feet to . point tn the inter..ction with the centerline o! N.W. Z2nd Avenue, .. recorded in O.R. Book 1138, Pave 1188, o! the publio Records o! Pal. aeach County, florida; thence with a bearlnCjl of North 89004' 32 II Bait, along the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue, a dietance of 118.31 feet to the Point of Bevinninq; thence North 10"4'39" last, a distance of 1241.06 feet to the South right of way line of L.W.D.D. Lateral 21; thence North 89008'49" Bast along the South right of way 11ne L.W.D.D. Lateral 21, as recorded in a.R. Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, a distance of 63S 93 feet to the centerline of the L W. D 0 Equalizing Canal B-4, as recorded in 0 R Book 1132, Page 612, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence along the centerline of the above described 8-4 Canal with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of Horth 10032'52" East, a radius of 150 00 feet, a central angle of 4004'17", and an arc length of 53.29 feet, thence continue along the centerline of the 1-4 Canal, with a bearing of Harth 12035100" East, a dietance of 320.69 feet to a point of curve; thence ~lth a curve to the left having a radius of 6500.00, a central angle of 302e' 30", and an arc length of 394.23 feet; thence North 9006' 30" Bast, a distance of 1919.16 feet to a point on th~ lIorth Line of Section 1,; thence with a bearing of North 89016'39" last, along the North line of section 11, a distance of 1964.50 feet; thence South 0002 '11" Bast, a distance at 2625.1S feet; thence North 8900S'49" Baet, a distance of 368 96 feet to a point on the Morth right of way line of N W 22nd Avenue ae recorded in a.R. Book 1138, .av- 1686 of the Public ,Record. of Pal. Beach County, rloridaf thence South 19027131" ~ast, a distance of 50 00 feet to the centerline of N W 22nd Avenu.; thence Wlith a curve to the right havinv a chord bearing of North 150Z9',9" Bast, a radius of 163/.02 feet, a central angle of 9053'58", and an arc length of 282.85 feet to a point, thence north 12002'41" Bast, ~ distance of 915 12 feet; thence North 0031' 11" East, a distance of 399.70 feet; thence North 89012'31" last, a distance of 413.21 f..t;then South 88022156" East, a distance of 1349.10 feet to a point on the West right of way line of the Seaboard coastline Railroad; thence South 0028121" Bast, along the West right of way line of the Railroad, a distance of 1309.09 feet to a point on the centerline of N W 22nd Avenu., thence North 88021'31" W.st, alona the centerline of N.W 2Znc1 Avenue a distance of 112." f..t, thence South 0033'53" Ba.t, a distance of 1306.69 feet, thence south 88045'31" last, a distance of 3JJ.51 feet to a point on the Weat right of way of the se.board co..tline Railroad, thence with a bearlnv of 80utb 14008'Z3d We.t, along the Weet ~ight ot way oe the railroad, a di.tanca of 1312.4' feat, thence South 0033'53" East, a distanc. of 26.19 feet, thence louth 1301S'a2" Welt, . distance of '20.11 e..,::, thance lIorch ".'0' 04- West, . distance of 181.60 feet, thence with a bearing North 004"21" We.t, . d18tp,nce of 200.00 fe.t, thence North 88050'04" We.t, . distance of 218.00 feet; thence South 004"21" Bast, a distance of 200 00 feet; thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 40 00 feet, thence South 0049'21" Bast, a dis~ance of 556 84 feet; thence North 88050'0." West, a distance of 3617.26 feet to a point on the centerline of the above described centerl ine of the E-4 Canal; thenc& with a bearing of North '018'14" We.t, a d18tance of 153 13 feet, thence with a curve to the right having a radius of 450 00 feet, a centra! ang!e of 1503".4", and an arc length II I. ILEGAL DBSCRIPTION I continued I I!of 122.62 .f.et; thence North 10018'30" S..t, . dietance of 1988.60 f.it to a point of curve, thence with a curve to the 1. , havinv a radiu. of,~!O.oO feet, . central an91e of l'020'0~ land an are length of It3.99 feet, th.nce with. b..ring of North 18001' 30" we.t, . distance of 1255.1t f.et to a point on the ;Icenterline of H.W. 22nd Avenue, thence with. beftr1n9 of South ;. 8g004' 3211 Meet, along the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue a Ildi.tance of 817.85 feet .ore or le.. to th. Point of 8eg1nn1ng !containinv 591.55 acr.e aor. or 1... and 8ubj.ct to .a....nts and rights of way of record. \. EXHIBIT "B" --. , ~ - . IL....~ ___ ... I I .1 I I l - c:.s if 17 ." ""\. f i~ ~ ~ 8.1 ~4 'll:o ~a EE - I j"""- ; -~ I : .. -...... I i n '---- .. ..-. .IJ . '"='=" Lo..... a~~J Ztu-t UJO -;ck (, " (.-') )~ 7 .cl/J;fJ vt"a,\A0 ~ r . J \ ~S 1\ V ,J ... ! ---.,I/J (,! f' t IL~ ~~~J" .)IJ ~.'. ~c {~U0/ cv "J r!d~~/~ ~ ",,( :011 " ! W"STEll PI.AN AWINOWINT NO, . JUlY U. 18.. lr- - U t "-......,.......... 1D . __ at N ... . ... ... ICIID& ~ II ........ .... - ........ .. . DUd ~1'1k . ........ ar .. ,.,.,... .... _ ~ ..-,ao ... c.aD .. ~ ___ ..... "- lIlY ........, . -_...,-.._-"-- .. ~...... . CLuIl .. ...... II " __ MIA. ... " : ft.ia.'A".!"'1.'n#__ , ---....---........ ~ ~.~-:"""'''~AI'UL.... MASTER SITE DEVEL~ LEGEND (:) Olr... 11..12 Acre. orllcl/~ 1,57 Acr.. O'Ilc'/HollI/~ 13.15 Iocr.. OIlIC./HollI 11.57 Acr.. Olllc./R1cO '.0' Act" O'IIaO/OId 2.U Act.. lodu.,'IoI/C_....... ZI.1I1l A.... 'odutl,IoI/RIcO/OIllce 23.111 AC.... loclu."'" 115.35 Acr.. ''',D 32.11 Acr.. lIilD/OId 2.40 A.." O...'"'".ntol/ln.tllut..... 31.110 Acr.. WellOnd. 11.00 A.... Sand PIn. R_ 40.00 A.... Rooell 41.13 A..... OPEN SPACI: ~ 10.17 Iocr.. Peril. L..... O"lntl"" ~ (311) 636-':'1600 KEY PLAN c.- QUANTUM PARK TOT Al S53.1.3 Ac;r.. MEETING MINUTES REGULAR CITY COMMISSION BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 16,1996 Attorney Cherof advised that he reviewed the language and found it acceptable He pointed out that this is an example of how the business community can provide information that we do not comprehend because it is not part of our standard operations Between first and second reading, Attorney Cherof will incorporate the language into subsection F in the definition of telecommunication towers EXECUTIVE SESSION - Finizio v City of Boynton Beach, et al (Case No. CL 91- 9205 AH) and Finizio v Mayor Edward Harmening, the City of Boynton Beach, et al (Case No. CL 94-3042 AH) At 9:35 pm, Attorney Cherof announced that the City Commission would recess to go into an Executive Session that would last approximately one hour Attendees at the Executive Session would include the members of the City Commission, the City Manager, the City Attorney, and the City's attorney of record in the legal proceeding, Tom Sheehan The regular City Commission meeting will resume when the Executive Session is completed, and there will be no public discussion or announcement following that Session At 11 :25 p.m , the regular City Commission meeting resumed x. LEGAL A. Ordinances - 2nd Reading - PUBLIC HEARING :Y~~ 1 Proposed Ordinance No. 096-33 RE Amending the previously approved PID master plan in connection with an amendment to the DRI, Quantum Park PID Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinance No 096-33 by title only MAYOR TAYLOR ANNOUNCED THE PUBLIC HEARING THERE WAS NO ONE PRESENT WHO WISHED TO SPEAK ON THIS ORDINANCE Motion Commissioner Bradley moved to approve Proposed Ordinance No 096-33 Commissioner Tillman seconded the motion City Clerk Sue Kruse polled the vote The vote was unanimous 2. Proposed Ordinance No 096-34 RE Amending Internal Revenue Code for Police Pension Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinance No 096-34 by title only 33 MEETING MINU) cS PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 9, 1996 Motion Mr Aguila moved to approve the minutes of the June 25, 1996 meeting Mr Wische seconded the motion Mr Aguila complimented the Recording Secretary for doing a good Job on a very cumbersome motion The motion carried 7-0 5. COMMUNICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Report from the Planning and Zoning Department 1 Final Disposition of Last Meeting's Agenda Items Ms Heyden reported that the Notice of Proposed Change to the DRI Amendm~nt for Quantum Park went to the City Commission last Tuesday, along with the use approval for CarMax and a land use change and rezoning to bring in Lots 80, 81, and 82 into the DRI The latter was tabled until the DRI amendment can catch up The Quantum Park use approval was approved subject to staff comments and the recommendations of the Planning and Development Board There was one change with regard to the timing of the greenbelt plans At the board meeting, a decision was made that the plans be submitted within 90 days after the approval That timing was moved up to prior to first site plan approval submitted for a perimeter lot. The land use amendment was approved for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs, subject to staff comments. After a very long and tedious meeting, a compromise was reached with regard to the Notice of Proposed Change to the DRI amendment. The DCA was present at the meeting It was decided that the applicant would revise the master plan to reflect staff comments Therefore, it was not attached to the DRI with all the comments written into the DRI She expects to receive the master plan tomorrow The second reading of the Ordinance for Quantum Park to add in all the conditions and changes, will take place at the next City Commission meeting In addition to agreeing to revise the master plan, Quantum Park agreed to designate Lots 53 and 54 as Government/Institutional These are the school lots which are on the west side of Quantum Boulevard They agreed to changing the timing of getting the traffic reports for future site plans to monitor the operating conditions Gateway, 1-95 and Gateway, and High Ridge Road to the time of site plan rather than building permit They 2 MEETING MINUTES PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 9,1996 agreed to change the master plan to reflect the cul-de-sac as bemg public Ms Heyden IS still researching to determine whether excess landscaping will be required Quantum Park agreed to incorporate the hotel traffic as part of the overall commercial traffic. and agreed to the square footages Included in the staff report Those square footages were slightly lower due to changes since the 1983 ADA to allow additional land uses which correspondingly decreased the commercial square footage Quantum agreed to upgrade the sewage lift station on Park Ridge Boulevard when the capacity IS exceeded It is predicted that based on sewage flows when the additional commercial comes In the 11ft station will need to be upgraded There were 30 commercial acres that were part of the DR\. Quantum was requesting a total of 83 total acres of commercial The City Commission required them to reduce that to reflect 30 acres, plus CarMax They are also required to indicate the commercial lots on the master plan that is attached to the development order The commercial will total approximately 47 acres B. Filing of Quarterly Report for Site Plan Waivers and Minor Site Plan Modifications Ms Heyden advised that the handout. which was included in the back-up packet. listed all commercial and residential permits that were reviewed as part of the building permit process. These are site plan waivers and minor site plan modifications which do not come to this board for review The purpose of providing this information is to make the board aware of what is coming and what staff is reviewing administratively Mr Aguila asked for clarification of the item regarding a red neon stripe on top of Carrabba's Restaurant on the Target outparcel Ms. Heyden stated that staff has turned it down, and if they want to pursue it, they have to file an administrative appeal Chairman Dube acknowledged the presence in the audience of Commissioner Jamie Titcomb 6. OLD BUSINESS A. Public Hearing ComDrehensive Plan Text Amendment (Postponed from June 11, 1996 Meeting) 1 Project Name Agent: Owner' Public Storage, Inc.lPlanning Area 1 q Mike Carter Construction, Inc Public Storage, Inc. .., -' MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 Mr Willard said the reason we are gOing forward wIth that is because It retains consistency with the underlying Comprehensive Plan We can bring those three lots Into the DRI, but we are gOing to simultaneously submit a ComprehensIve Plan request to DCA to change It from office to industrial Ms Heyden advised that we will process a subsequent development order to change It back to commercIal There are also two staff conditions In Exhibit 0 that are still applicable One pertains to the pump statIon upgrade and one pertains to the traffic. Until we have FOOT's comments, the latter condition needs to remain With regard to the comment regarding the pump station upgrade, City Attorney Cherof advised that even though this was Incorporated In th~ ordinance, the comment still needs to be Included It will end up being satisfied Immediately upon the adoption of the ordinance If that language is changed Motion Commissioner Titcomb moved to approve subject to the conditions in Exhibit 0, and also the condition that the use on the master plan for these lots be changed to office Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz seconded the motion, which carried 5-0 B Project Name Agent Owner' Location Description See discussion under Item VI.A. .---' J (.. ~ Quantum Park PIO James G Willard, Shutts & Bowen Quantum Associates West side of the intersection of Interstate 95 and Gateway Boulevard Master Plan Modification Request to amend the previously approved PID master plan in connection With an amendment to the DRI to add 13 17 acres (the PCD Center subdivision) to the PiD boundaries and change the use designation from office to commercial/industnal use, add the option of commercial use to the eXisting use designated for lots 65A, 658, 66, 67 A, 678, 67C 68A,68B 69,70, 72, 73A, 738, 74 - 79,83 - 85 and 91 and change the use designation of lots 58, 59, 60 and 61 from commercial to industrial/research and development/office ~I ~'~ 33 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 Ms Heyden stated that all the pOInts discussed this evening have been worked out except for the floating commercial We agreed to a maximum of 47 acres, however. 83 acres are still shown on the master plan Mayor Taylor wanted the commercial moved when projects come In Mr Willard stated that there IS only one master plan nght now We have proposed an area of approxImately 80 acres within which we could have 47 acres of commercial By adding the 30 acres maximum In the notes we have the assurance that even though we have commerCial Identified as a permitted use it is maxed out at 30 acres Mayor Taylor asked why Mr Willard wants to show 83 acres. Mr Willard agreed to designate SIX or seven lots that add up to 30 acres and put in the note that at the discretion of the City Commission, the location of commercial lots could be reconfigured, subject to City CommiSSion approval City Manager Parker said if Mr Willard identifies 30 acres around the CarMax, the Commission could approve or disapprove specific lots for commercial as users come In Commissioner Bradley asked If it is necessary to designate the commercial lots this evening Mr Willard did not think so He said the existing plan shows all the commercial lots on Quantum Lakes Drive The only permitted use is commercial If we move the commercial, we have no other permitted land uses on those lots. City Manager Parker advised Mr WIllard that we can add the land uses on those lots this evening. He proposed to leave the deSignation of those lots in red as commercial with a notation saying that the location of the commercial can be reconfigured subject to City Commission approval He said It is difficult to market lots on 1-95 or near this intersection He hoped the CarMax would be the catalyst that would promote some commercial development along 1-95 Mayor Taylor had no objection to letting Mr Willard put 30 acres of commercial where he wants to, but he did not want to see 80 acres of commercial on the plan Mr Willard deSignated the following lots as commercial 81,82,91,678, 65A and B. 64 and 63 He said he will delete the reference to commercial from all the other lots The previously deSignated commercial lots will be designated as industrial and office A notation will be added about the flexibility of moving the commercial around, plus the limitation of a total of 47 commercial acres. During a discussion with Mr Stewart and Ms. Heyden, he noted that there is a discrepancy In the reference to the square footage on industrial Therefore, he proposed to reduce the square footage from 4 443,120 to 2.784 354 The reason for that is that it reflects square footage attributable to the acres that wound up being included for the high school site In 34 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUL V 2, 1996 order not to alter the vested trip generation that we have in Palm Beach County, we will add a line saYing that the vested trips for the project shall remain at 63,752. ~ Mr Willard advised that at Mr Stewart's request, he agreed to add Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the DCA to the end of paragraph 3, section 2 of the ordinance If the intersection of Park Ridge and Gateway were to exceed 2,300 peak hour trips, it would require further approval by the city, the Treasure Coast RegIonal PlannIng Council. and the DCA. Also, the ordinance would reflect the amendments that he discussed in his earlier presentation Motion Commissioner Bradley moved to find that the proposed changes do not constitute a substantial deviation under Florida Statutes, that no further ORI review is necessary, that the revised master plan does not constitute a substantial change, and that an amendment to the development order, which is the ordinance on tonight's agenda, be issued subject to the revisions that Mr Willard discussed with the Commission Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz seconded the motion, which carried 5-0 City Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinance 96-33 by title only Motion Commissioner Titcomb moved to approve Proposed Ordinance No 96-33 on first reading. Commissioner Bradley seconded the motion A roll call vote was polled by the City Clerk The motion carried 5-0 VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS Description Quantum Park PID James G Willard Quantum Associates West Side of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road Use Approval Request to amend the list of permitted uses for the Quantum Corporate Park PIO to allow used and new car sales on commercially designated lots within the PIO C Project. Agent" Owner" Location 35 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 Michael J Melillo, Code & License Inspector Joanne M Powell, Customer Relations Robert Ribatto, Foreman I, Parks Department Theresa Rodriguez, Relief Clerk, Library Bernard Russell, Bldg Maintenance Mechanic II Charles S Smith, Sanitation Equipment Operator IV Archie Underwood, Utilities Maintenance Mechanic II Victor Wooten, HVAC Mechanic II, Facilities Management Mark L. Woznick, Firefighter III City Manager Parker thanked all these employees for their service to the city Mayor Taylor recognized these employees who have served the city well throughout the year He appreciated their effort and years of service to the city 3. Presentation of Firefighter Olympic Trophy by Firefighter Martin Firefighter Martin was not present, therefore, this item was not addressed 4 Employee of the Month - June 1996 City Manager Parker and Mayor Taylor honored Willie Adams as Employee of the Month for setting a positive example for other employees and for the city when he found a checkbook, including cash, and turned it into the Police Department V BIDS None VI. PUBLIC HEARING A. Project Name Quantum ParklPID/PCD Center Applicant requested continuance to July 2, 1996 Agent James G Willard, Esquire Owner Quantum Associates Location 13 93 acres of property at the southwest corner of 1-95 and Gateway Boulevard Description Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map 8 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2, 1996 from Office Commercial to Industrial and rezone from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Industrial Development (PID) to add into the Quantum Park PID At this time, Mayor Taylor advised that a new policy is being instituted this evening to try to shorten the meetings He asked the presenters to try to limit their comments to eight minutes and to cover only the pertinent issues He pointed out that the Commission has extensive backup on all the projects Mr Cherof advised that the following items on the agenda are quasi-judicial hearings Quantum Park land use element amendment/rezoning Quantum Park master plan modification Woolbright Place PUD master plan modification Citrus Park PUD master plan modification Quantum Park PID use approval He also advised that the record this evening will consist, at a minimum, of the documents in the Commission backup package If there are other documents that anybody wishes to have made part of the record, they need to be identified to the clerk, and a copy left with the clerk. If there are any Commissioners who have had contact with any of the applicants for these Items, they need to identify that particular contact for the record At this time, everyone who intended to testify this evening was sworn in by Mr Cherof Mayor Taylor advised that some months ago, he spoke with representatives from Quantum when they were originally thinking about bringing these three parcels into the Quantum PID He also received a call from Anna Cottrell today, asking if he had any questions in regard to the Woolbright Place project Commissioner Titcomb advised that he was contacted by Michael Morton a few weeks ago with regard to the Woolbright Place project, and he has had limited contact with the Quantum people James Willard, the attorney for Quantum Associates, stated that there are three items dealing with Quantum that are all related on the agenda this evening He asked if he could address the PID use approval (Item XIII C) at the same time that we have the public hearings because it is a related item The Commission had no objection to this 9 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2, 1996 Mr Willard said the primary application before the Commission this evening deals with an amendment to the Quantum Park DRI There were three specific objectives that Quantum Associates tried to accomplish with the DRI amendment There were three lots within Quantum Park, Lots 80,81 and 82, that were never part of the DRI These three lots are located just south of Gateway Boulevard at 1-95 Mr Willard displayed the existing approved master site development plan, dated October 28, 1994, for Quantum This was adopted by the City Commission when the high school deal came through and the southwest quadrant was approved for the high school site That was the last significant change to the development plan He also displayed the proposed master site development plan dated July 1, 1996 Mr Willard advised that he trying is trying to accomplish three things with this plan He is trying to bring the three lots into the Quantum Park DRI Also, a transportation analysis was required at the time the high school was included, analyzing the operating characteristics of the intersection at Gateway Boulevard and Park Ridge Road At that time, the Commission requested that this intersection be analyzed because Park Ridge Boulevard would be abandoned at a portion when the high school was built Therefore, there was a concern about the operating characteristics at this main intersection That was the focal point of the transportation study The third objective was to reconfigure and relocate the approved location of some commercial uses within Quantum Park. There previously were commercial uses on the lots around Quantum Lakes Drive We are proposing to identify the area outlined in red on the chart (primarily along 1-95 and near the intersection of Gateway and Park Ridge) which would be acceptable for commercial uses In the course of the discussions with the Regional Planning Council and the city staff, we have identified maximum intensities of development for different land use categories within Quantum that were contained in the original DRI application in 1984 At the request of the city and the Regional Planning Council, these maximum intensities have been reflected on the plan as follows industrial use, including research and development, approximately 4,400,000 square feet, commercial, including any hotel rooms, would be limited to a maximum of 426,888 square feet, and office at 1,685,772 square feet Mr Willard was seeking approval of commercial uses as permitted uses within these lots, in addition to the existing office and industrial uses, up to the maximum threshold of the 426,888 square feet, including any hotel rooms He was aware of the concern that the acreage which may be absorbed by that amount of square footage After further negotiation with city staff, particularly Carrie Parker, he would not exceed 29 7 acres, approximately 30 acres, of commercial land use, in addition to the proposed office Car Max site, which is proposed for lots 77, 78, 79, and 80 That takes into account the originally approved acreage plus the three lots that are coming into the DRI We would also abide 10 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 by the acreage limitation of 426,000 square feet, which we think is adequate to accommodate expected development demands for commercial uses in this area Since the entire park is zoned PID, each specific use has to go before the Planning and Development Board and the City Commission Therefore, the previous commercial uses that were approved will be known, including what they look like, how they fit it, how the character of the park is developing He believed that if it is developing in a positive manner, the city will be accommodating more conditional commercial uses, if required, in the future Mr Willard advised that the plan dated July 1 st incorporates all the changes requested by the Regional Planning Council He referred to the transportation analysis He advised that he has received approval letters and consensus from the DOT, the County, and the Regional Planning Council with respect to the study that was submitted, which identifies a series of improvements that will be necessary to the Gateway/Park Ridge intersection as development occurs within the park. As those levels of trip generations trigger, improvements will have to be made (additional right turn lanes and left turn lanes) It is already a signalized intersection, but at maximum build out, you will have dual left turns and a dual right turn Those improvements are identified in the proposed ordinance, as well as different trip generation thresholds He believes all the other agencies have signed off on that At the city's request, we are also seeking the rezoning of the three lots that are coming into the DRI, which were previously zoned planned commercial development Since the rest of Quantum Park is PID, it would be appropriate to zone these three lots PID to be consistent with everything else in Quantum Because of the concern that recently arose regarding inconsistency with the underlying Comp Plan designation, the land use plan designation for those lots, we are only identifying them as approved for commercial and office use, which we believe eliminates the necessity of a Comp Plan amendment which would have to be sent to Tallahassee and be approved by DCA It is a long and tedious process and conflicts with our request this evening to have the DRI amendment, since your DRI amendment has to be consistent with the underlying Comp Plan designations Therefore, by eliminating industrial, we feel we eliminate the necessity for that Comp Plan change The last thing before the Commission this evening is the PID use approval which, because of the zoning classification, every use of the lot coming into the city has to go through the use approval process On the four lots that are outlined in yellow on the plan, we are proposing to authorize that to be used for a auto dealership, specifically, a Car Max super 11 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 store, which is a relatively new concept offered by Circuit City stores He introduced Jim Thornton of Richmond, Virginia, who explained the Car Max dealership Mr Thornton stated that Circuit City saw the used car business as an area that had a great deal of potential for a retailer who had experience in making customers happy and giving customers what they want. The car business has, in some cases, developed an unsavory reputation with customers as not being sensitive to customers' needs Circuit City saw an opportunity to offer customers a wide selection of very late model cars with a quality that Circuit City stands behind with warranties, and a product the customer can trust, offered in a very low key, dignified, low pressure environment. The customer experience is designed to be as close to going shopping for a refrigerator or a stove as Circuit City can make it. To that end, the Car Max developments are designed to look more like shopping centers than like what most people associate with used car lots We take away all the tinsel and search lights and the high pressured salesmen Customers can go through the entire process without talking to a salesman until the end if that is what they want to do The development reflects that type of low keyed, dignified approach It tends to be a very low impact development for the community The traffic generated by a Car Max development is generally a quarter to a third of what a retail development on the same site would generate Water is recycled on site, so the utility usage tends to be very low At the same time, the development generates a substantial amount of benefit for the community We expect the Car Max to generate between 125 and 150 jobs The median income will be between $25,000 and $30,000 There will also be a significant tax generation from real estate taxes, sales taxes, and license taxes There is also a ripple effect throughout the community since Car Max offers such a wide selection of cars It cannot possibly stock all the parts for all the cars that it offers for sale, so it relies very heavily on local vendors for tires, batteries, and parts That ripple effect on the local economy would be in the neighborhood of about $1 million We think the Car Max development fits in well It is a low impact, attractive development, and provides significant impacts for the city He pointed out the four lots on which the Car Max Development will be located Mr Willard stated that the ordinance is the operative document that changes the DRI This becomes part of the DRI development order The ordinance reflects all the recommendations of the Planning and Development Board and staff Mr Willard proposed the following changes to the proposed ordinance 1 On page 3, in paragraph number 2, the date was changed from June 11 th to July 1 st to reflect the date of the new plan 12 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2, 1996 2 Paragraph number 4 was deleted This paragraph simply reflects a designation on two lots, which was a mistake It has been changed and shown on the plan now Two lots were sold to the high school and should have been marked as government and institutional That correction has been made, and since this plan is incorporated by reference as an exhibit, it does not need to be in the text of the agreement 3 In paragraph number 5, he agreed with Ms Heyden's recommendation to change "building permit", to "site plan", which puts the provision of the traffic information a little earlier in the approval process 4 Paragraph 6 was deleted On the face of the plan, we were requested to reflect the section of Park Ridge Boulevard that would be abandoned once the high school got built It is shown in cross hatching, and we had inadvertently extended the cross hatching a little past the cul-de-sac on the south side It was not intended to close public traffic to that cul-de-sac That was simply an error when we did the original plan It has been pulled back, which eliminates the need for paragraph number 6 5 Reword paragraph 7(c) to state "strongly encouraged" instead of it being a mandatory requirement Ms Heyden was pleased that Mr Willard agreed to reduce the commercial acreage She asked if that includes a reduction in the location of the commercial or if he is still asking for the option on all 86 acres Mr Willard said he is still asking for the option on all 86 acres City Manager Parker advised that the three lots that are coming into Quantum Park are 13 93, and the lots that are being utilized for Car Max are 17 11, or a difference of 3 18 additional acres if paragraph 7(c) is reworded as Mr Willard suggested Ms Heyden wanted this to be a requirement, especially on Gateway Boulevard, and that a comprehensive landscape plan be devised with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, who frequently provides this service for free to cities She would like this done prior to the first site plan submittal City Manager Parker pointed out that one of the difficulties is that Quantum does not know who is going to come in on what lot. They have to come in for use approval prior to submitting a site plan For example, if they come in with a lot and a use on Gateway 13 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 Boulevard, the Commission can require additional landscaping if they feel it is needed for that particular use Mr Willard strongly objected to doing a landscaping design package, especially with the Regional Planning Council, for unknown uses He said landscaping is an important component of how it looks when you drive by on 1-95 or when you drive along Gateway He agreed, as the Planning and Development Board had recommended, to do enhanced landscaping and show it on site plans as they are submitted to the city on a case by case basis for any commercial use in this area Commissioner Bradley mentioned the perimeter greenbelt City Manager Parker advised that Mr Willard is referring to the traffic along Gateway Mr Willard stated that the 1-95 frontage specifically creates the issue of the peripheral greenbelt, however, that is not the intent of this particular paragraph Mr Willard reiterated that he would be happy to address the landscaping characteristics of those particular lots as they come in for site plan approval To try to create standards in advance, not knowing the nature of the use, how tall the building is going to be, what the setbacks are going to be, and what it is that you are trying to buffer or not buffer, is extremely difficult You wind up with standards that are meaningless and very hard to apply on a case by case basis without substantial waivers or variances when the user comes in Ms Heyden said that is like saying you cannot have a landscape code in the city until you know what uses are coming in She felt you can plan ahead The people who do this for a living are very familiar with this kind of work and can do this so it is not onerous and is not a problem for each use as it comes in Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, as part of this DRI, does not look at the local issues as we do It is up to us to see that we are protecting ourselves and our city They have offered this service They have done this for other cities It is something that can be done ahead of time We are not going to get the continuity that we are looking for with our planned districts if we wait and do it on a lot by lot basis Mr Willard said there is a landscape code We are talking about enhanced landscaping, something over and above what the landscaping code already requires Quantum Park has a very expensive lush landscaping plan all through the park, through the medians and along the rights-of-way The standard has been established there that at the very minimum, it is going to be maintained and probably increased for commercial uses that would otherWise be visible along Gateway He did not think there is a basis to be 14 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 concerned about a deficient level of landscaping associated with the quality of the project and the price that people are going to pay for the ability to locate on these lots 6 Delete paragraphs 8 and 9 Mr Willard said that information is reflected on the plan The plan would have to be slightly changed to reflect the 30 acre limitation on commercial Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz asked where the hotel site would be Mr Willard said there are five lots that are designated for hotel usage Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz asked if small commercial establishments could be put in instead of a hotel site Mr Willard answered affirmatively City Manager Parker advised that Mr Willard has offered to limit the commercial to 30 acres, in addition to the Car Max, anywhere in that location For example, if a Shell station came in on the corner and the City Commission did not want to approve that use, they could deny it comes in for use approval Mr Willard added that there is still a site specific approval process that we have to go through on every single lot, regardless of what is done tonight City Manager Parker advised that Mr Willard agreed not go with the whole 86 acres Mr Willard said that is correct It simply identifies the boundaries of the area where commercial would be permitted Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz asked if the area that was originally set forth commercial will continue to be commercial Mr Willard said, "No" The deletion of paragraph 8 was acceptable to Ms Heyden However, she advised that there has not been a revised traffic study Greg Stewart from the Department of Community Affairs in Tallahassee was present to discuss his concerns with the development order Ms Heyden understands that although they agreed to it, it has not been revised yet in a traffic study, which would need to be done prior to the development order being approved With regard to paragraph 9, Ms Heyden said she has not seen the revised master plan, but will take Mr Willard's word for it. 15 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 7 Reword paragraph 11 to state as follows The sewage lift station serving Park Ridge Boulevard shall be upgraded at Quantum's expense at such time as development generates sewer flow in excess of the lift station capacity as reasonably determined by the Utilities Department Mr Willard recognized that, depending upon the level of development, we may exceed the capacity of that particular lift station, in which case it has to be expanded City Manager Parker asked Mr Willard if he realizes that it may not be actual flow It may be permitted or planned capacity, which would necessity an upgrade Mr Willard answered affirmatively This revised language was acceptable to Ms Heyden Ms Heyden stated that an unexpected issue arose on Friday, and we struggling with how to deal with it We were looking to change the zoning and the land use of the acres that are being added to the DRI from PCD to PID The problem with dropping out the land use amendment and going forward with the rezoning is that this zoning category is not allowed under the current land use Therefore, in order to change the zoning to PID, you would need a corresponding land use amendment. We have not discussed whether we want to exclude industrial as an option on those lots Ms Heyden recommended that those not excluded because of their locations, and for the same reasons that she has concerns with additional commercial being added But right now, if we drop the land use amendment application, there is no corresponding application to change the PCD master plan and the uses that are allowed on that application The DCA today would entertain an expedited review of this land use amendment Ms Heyden believed this could be worked out, however, the three parties involved would have to discuss this Mr Willard did not believe the Comprehensive Plan amendment is necessary if those three lots are designated as commercial or office There are three levels of regulatory control over this project which the city has available to it You have a future land map which has very generic designations of different areas of the city You then have the zoning code that specifies particular zoning categories within which there are all kinds of permitted uses and prohibited uses On thiS project, it is a DRI So in addition, you have a development order which requires a master site development plan For reasons unbeknownst to him, the original master plan for Quantum had extremely specific uses designated on every single platted lot which has continued to be a problem to this date because it makes flexibility almost impossible It is very constraining to how you market the property when you have a site specific plan like this that designates each and every lot for a particular use That 16 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 is why we are proposing that some of these lots be changed We are trying to achieve a certain level of flexibility You cannot amend a development order in DRI to a land use inconsistent with underlying Comprehensive Plan Zoning does not matter So if the underlying Comprehensive Plan designation for these three lots is office and commercial, which is what we were told they were, then by eliminating the industrial land use category on the master plan, we are now consistent with the underlying Comprehensive Plan because the development order for the DRI, by this plan, limits it to commercial and office Mr Willard said he talked to Jim Snyder of the Regional Planning Council today and he is satisfied with that and does not feel that a Comprehensive Plan amendment is necessary Ms Heyden said the problem is the land use is office/commercial, not office and commercial We have a separate category called local retail commercial that would allow the kinds of uses Mr Willard is talking about Therefore, it is not allowed in the current land use She explained that the current designation is office and Mr Willard is proposing to add commercial in addition to office Last Friday it was office/industrial/commercial Now they are asking tonight to drop the industrial, and City Manager Parker suggested dropping off the commercial designation as well to solve this problem Mr Willard stated that for the last 10 years, three lots were zoned planned commercial district He asked if that has been inconsistent with the underlying Comprehensive Plan designation Ms Heyden said it has not been inconsistent because the master plan that governs that PCD allowed for office use, not commercial use She said there are no uses in the PCD It is governed by the master plan It is a little complicated because Mr Willard said this master plan has been tied up in the DRI The master plan required for a DRI is more conceptual than the master plan that we would require for a planned district. She spoke to the Treasure Coast about this on Friday She said maybe it is time for us to break apart the two master plans so that when Mr Willard wants to add a land use and move it around, it is done locally as a master plan amendment instead of by a notice of proposed change Ms Heyden said Mr Willard has had a lot of frustration during the past couple of years that he has been involved in this project because this master plan is very detailed It is more detailed than a regular DRI master plan because the zoning district for Quantum Park requires a master plan She discussed this problem with Treasure Coast and they told her about other ORis in which there were similar problems They wrote into the development order the splitting apart of the two master plans so that there is a DRI master plan that would have the maximum acreage and square footage on it. Then you would have the local master plan that would show where all those uses are located When there is a change to that, it would come through the local process only as a master plan modification and a notice of proposed change would not have to be filed with the State 17 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY2,1996 Mayor Taylor asked how long this process will take Ms Heyden advised that it can be added into the development order that the Commission will be approving two weeks from now City Manager Parker advised that an amendment could be made between first and second reading of the ordinance Mr Stewart did not believe amendments could be made between first and second reading Therefore, first reading would have to be postponed until the development order is amended He said this would allow time to clarify some other issues of concern between the local government, the Regional Planning Council, and the Department of Community Affairs Mr Willard was not aware of these other issues Mr Stewart said he has not received the letter from FOOT Mr Willard advised that it has been issued, however Mr Stewart said it needs to be in hand He hopes that resolves a lot of the issues with the transportation because that was the biggest State concern The second issue was with the flexibility with the land uses and the square footage Looking at the new land use map, he can kind of tell that at least what we had talked about on the telephone was done, including tying the hotel into the acreage However, he said Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz brought up a good point regarding where that hotel site would be Since you have it flexed into all of the actual square footage of the commercial, it could actually wind up at any location There are different trip generation rates, and he was not sure what Treasure Coast and Maria Palombo's review of the transportation plan said Therefore, there are some issues that need to be resolved City Manager Parker asked Mr Stewart if he could provide the standard State language to split the two master plans so we could insert it this evening instead of making the amendment change between first and second reading Mr Stewart asked for a recess so all the parties involved could discuss this matter Mayor Taylor opened the public hearing Henrietta Solomon, 230 N E 26th Avenue, stated that there was much discussion in the past about used car dealers, and they are not wanted in Boynton Beach Lee Wische, 1302 S W 18th Street, said for six years this acreage was zoned industrial and they could not get anybody in He said the consensus at the visions conference was as follows 18 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 . Create a more user-friendly government structure, especially for Cod e Enforcement and Zoning divisions . Develop a task force to determine how to encourage businesses to locate in Quantum Park. . The current development approval process is not flexible enough to attract future development The City Commission and other boards also need to be more flexible in their attitude toward development. The city must streamline its permitting process to accommodate economic development and might study other cities considered user-friendly by the business community and apply their techniques to Boynton Beach A task force could be set up to review the development codes Mr Wische asked if we are here to help or to hinder Marshall Friedland, 330 N E 26th Avenue, spoke about how difficult it is to change indentured land, land nailed down so tightly that the development of the land cannot follow a natural flow He stated that Circuit City is an honest company that does as they say They have an excellent track record He felt this new concept of merchandising used automobiles is exciting, and pointed out that this land has lay vacant for years He felt this project will beautify the land and generate dollars and jobs for our community No one else wished to speak. Mayor Taylor summarized that with regard to the land use, we are talking about bringing three other parcels into Quantum Park and changing the land use and zoning With regard to designation of commercial/industrial/office, the applicant is asking to move commercial lots to another area and designate it commercial We also have to consider the Car Max proposal He said the traffic issue needs to be settled Another concern is landscaping The applicants want 7(c) of the proposed ordinance to be reworded to state "strongly recommended" instead of "required" There is also a question of whether the landscaping should be done now with an overall plan, or lot by lot. Mayor Taylor said we have approved 30 acres of commercial in Quantum Park. We are talking about adding another 17 acres with the three lots that are coming in That would bring it up to 47 acres In his mind, we have increased the allowable commercial by at least 50 percent He did not object to this, however, he objected to moving all the commercial over to one area all at one time without knowing what is going on that land He wanted to leave the 30 acres where they are and move them lot by lot. Vice Mayor 19 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2, 1996 Jaskiewicz agreed with Mayor She was concerned about what could go on those particular lots, however, she had no objection to the Car Max Commissioner Tillman did not have any problems with the Car Max However, there are many issues that have to be dealt with in terms of this blanket issue of adding 50 percent of commercial land He had no problem with additional commercial land, but he would like to know what that land is going to be used for Commissionel~it.anDwas supportive of the mechanisms necessary to get Quantum Park going However, he was concerned about the concept of rotating commercial use around in a large area like this His fears stemmed from the point of meeting a condition that relates to adjacent and contiguous lots to prevent leap frog inclusion zoning He was supportive of the Car Max concept and including the new lots to the northeast into the master plan However, he was afraid that if we approve Car Max there, approve another commercial development in the three lots outlined in red on the chart, another one in the northeast corner, and one in the very south tip of the overall zone, who is to say that a few Commissions from now there will not be an intelligent argument to be had to turn this area into commercial because it is surrounded by commercial He did not have any problem with giving the Quantum people the acreage they want, or with the Car Max concept, however, his biggest concern is the floating commercial We need to know what is going in there before we give a blanket floating situation One other concern he had was with the landscaping ahd the look of this area He had a certain amount of faith that Quantum and some of these other companies involved are going to put in very nice landscaping It is part of their image and their mission, however, he thinks we have a little leverage to consider the look of Quantum Park and how it is viewed by 1-95 and the city He referred to the new landscaping going in at the interchanges at 1-95 and at Boynton Beach Boulevard and Woolbright and would like similar treatment to be encouraged at Quantum, such as rows of Palm trees that mirror the look that the whole corridor is taking He would like to encourage that or look for mechanisms that we can marry that to the approvals of the usage of the land Generally, he gets the feeling that we do not want to see an outparcel haven on this Quantum site He felt it was possible to find a compromise where we get some overall usage commitments and O'lI'~-beautmeatto" eommrtfTlems in return for flexibility Commissioner Bradley felt the overall vision that Quantum Park was initially begun under, which is an industrial park, is important. He agreed that flexibility is important He is not opposed to the increase in commercial, but he felt it was important that the overall industrial feel and flavor of Quantum Park stay in tact He pointed out that industry is 20 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 important to families in terms of providing jobs and a tax base that is different from retail He mentioned the feeder school concept, which revolved around the idea that graduating seniors might become part of a job pool that would keep them in this community, and their children would end up going to Poinciana Elementary School, etc He wanted the quality of life in Boynton Beach to be high and positive so that people would not relocate Industry is a key component to that. If we can bring in more companies along the technology lines, he felt we will be doing a great thing He felt there needs to be a mechanism that will ensure that the commercial development does not happen haphazardly and that there are enough controls and checks in place that will make sure that it happens in a way that is going to make for a good commercial corridor, but at the same time not make things too lopsided in that development. Commissioner Bradley had concerns about the greenbelt around the entire perimeter of Quantum Park He thinks this is very critical, especially if we are looking at reducing the buffer at 1-95 from 40 feet to 25 feet. He understands the concerns that the applicant has made about there being a 40 foot buffer because there are homes adjacent. However, he pointed out that they are across eight lanes of traffic He wanted a plan to put the perimeter greenbelt in place, and he wanted it to have native plants If we are going to reduce it in the area along 1-95, he would like it beefed up in other areas He also would like to see a mix between some exposure and some landscaping along the 1-95 corridor He hopes the applicant or staff can come back with other projects along 1-95 that have utilized landscaping effectively, perhaps an understory where you have some low shrubbery that softens the look and a higher story of Palms, so there is some exposure and some advertising With regard to the floating commercial acreage, Mr Willard stated that since this is a PID zoning classification where every specific use needs to go before the Planning and Development Board and the City Commission, he did not have a problem with not designating any particular lot commercial and coming back with a specific site plan He would simply note that in addition to the square footage limitation, there is a limitation of 30 additional acres of commercial, the precise location of which is subject to City Commission approval Mr Willard said clearly the overall thrust and character of Quantum is an industrial/office/research type park. Despite the commercial development that may occur here, he felt it is ancillary to the primary focus of the park as an industrial opportunity for employment centers in Boynton Beach Notwithstanding that 30 acres may be commercial some day, he felt there is ample absorption of acreage off this industrial throughout the balance of the park for the foreseeable future He believed the traffic related issues have 21 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2, 1996 been resolved He also believed the Comprehensive Plan inconsistency issue can be resolved during the break. He said if we can come up with a mechanism to eliminate the site specific uses on the DRI master plan and leave those as purely local issues, that would be great. Mr Willard had no objection to developing a peripheral greenbelt plan He stated that there was a need for some clear understanding as to what the periphery of Quantum is going to look like Clearly, the 1-95 frontage is going to be treated one way It is not just the eight lanes of traffic on 1-95, but there is a train there as well and there is a difference in grade You cannot possibly see what is on the other side of the interstate The uses that will eventually be constructed in this area want that visibility We specifically talked about types of landscaping plans which help identify the character and the quality of the development so that you see both the landscaped nature of the project and what is on the lots He believed a combination of that can be proposed in different widths along the 1-95 frontage It would be easier with respect to Car Max because that is a specific project It will be a little more generic with respect to the other lots because undoubtedly people will seek variances from it from time to time as specific users come in However, he felt we could come up with some guidelines that would have to be adhered to subject to Commission variance on the other 1-95 lots The other areas that border residential are to the south across the canal and in this area there is nothing developed right now To the extent that Quantum Associates still owns a great deal of those properties, a guideline can be put in place Commissioner Bradley inquired about the landscaping by the high school Mr Willard said the School Board owns the high school site and they are exempt from local zoning and other design controls With regard to landscaping, Mayor Taylor wanted some consistency that encompasses the entire theme of the park, including the area along the 1-95 corridor He understands that there will be some variations due to some exposure, but there ought to be some sort of consistency to the whole plan The buildings are probably going to be 20 or 30 feet high, so you can run hedges below so you do not see the cars or the people at the ground level, but still see the signage and the buildings He did not want to see one person with four Palm trees and the person next to him with nothing There has to be some sort of standardization Mr Willard agreed He said that is only in the best interest of the park. There is tremendous expense and capital investment in landscaping in Quantum today, even though there are not many users there They certainly want to maintain and enhance that quality as parcels get developed for the benefit and enhancement of the value of the rest of the park. 22 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 Mayor Taylor agreed, but felt we should give them a little guidance With regard to the landscaping on Gateway Boulevard, staff wants a plan up-front before anything goes in there The applicant wants to do it as users come in Mayora~ felt believes the Commission is going to be extremely stringent on the appearance along Gateway Boulevard when it comes to landscaping If the applicant is willing to exceed the landscape code, he will work with them on a site by site basis However, once the first site gets In and sets the standard for what we want there, then the others who come in are going to have to comply with that Mayor Taylor asked how the Commjssion~ls about approving the landscaping as users come in Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz concurred ~ith the site plan approval for each particular one as it is developed Commissioner.... would like to see some consistency When you drive down Gateway Boulevard, you see a lush green area and he \/Yo.wld like to continue to see that, in addition to development Commissioner Bradley agreed ttlat we can trust Mr Willard to do the right thing At this time, the parties involved in the Quantum projects left the Chambers to discuss the outstanding issues, and Public Audience was dispensed with next VII PUBLIC AUDIENCE Paul Pfenninger, 4085 Floral Drive, said he is the spokesperson for property owners who live north of Gateway and south of Sausalito Place He advised that Sausalito Place has blocked all of their drainage Their homes will flood Sausalito issued the property owners an ultimatum They wanted them to sign a letter of agreement stating that they would put pipes in but that they would not guaranty that they will work. The property owners would not sign the agreement City Manager Parker advised that Floral Drive is in the County Sausalito Groves was permitted in the county and then the city annexed them after the property was already permitted in the county It was permitted to County standards, which are very similar to city standards in that no water from Sausalito goes onto Mr Pfenninger's property The problem is that the homes located on his street are older homes on one street that was basically in the middle of the orange grove Their water was draining onto Sausalito The letter that Mr Pfenninger distributed was an attempt by the developer to assist the homeowners The developer has met all the criteria to hold his own water on his own property These homes that are on this street do not have any drainage because they are older homes There is no drainage available to them When Sausalito went through their 23 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY2,1996 to the issue of the recreation area The pool almost sits on the down and is adversely going to affect the neighborhood He could not support this project Commissioner Titcomb felt the 25 foot buffer was important He has not seen any creativity to redesign this project. He said we ask developers on a regular basis to make concessions That is part of the process He saw nothing significant or new to change his mind about this project Since he did not have a consensus of all the residents and city staff, he could not support this project. Commissioner Bradley would have liked to seen more concession in the area of the buffer He would have preferred a single-family project, however, he respected the neighbor's desires Mayor Taylor was concerned about the pool being closer to the adjacent development What he heard to night is that people supported this because they preferred single-family over multi-family He pointed out that they were not asked about the buffer Also, to get the 2 5 feet, the applicant has cut some of the lots, and they are already small enough Michael Morton appreciated the Commission's reconsideration of this project He disagreed with Gary Lehnertz He said the neighborhood has spoken and he has heard a consensus against single-family and the 125 foot buffer He thanked the Commission for giving him the opportunity to go back to the neighborhood He said he will come back with a plan with another design in the future Ms Cottrell withdrew this application At this time, the parties involved in the Quantum Park projects returned and those items were discussed next VI PUBLIC HEARING A. Project Name Quantum Park/PID/PCD Center Applicant requested continuance to July 2, 1996 Agent James G Willard, Esquire Owner Quantum Associates Location 13 93 acres of property at the southwest corner of 1-95 and Gateway Boulevard 33 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 Description Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map from Office Commercial to Industrial and rezone from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Industrial Development (PID) to add rnto the Quantum Park PID Ms Heyden advised that an agreement was reached to proceed with the land use element amendmenVrezoning Therefore, we need an action to transmit this to the Department of Community Affairs The only change is the use as office rather than commercial Mr Willard said the reason we are going forward with that is because it retains consistency with the underlying Comprehensive Plan We can bring those three lots into the DRI, but we are going to simultaneously submit a Comprehensive Plan request to DCA to change it from office to industrial Ms Heyden said we will process a subsequent development order to change it back to commercial There are also two staff conditions In Exhibit 0 that are still applicable One pertains to the pump station upgrade, and one pertains to the traffic Until we have FDOT's comments, the latter condition needs to remain With regard to the comment regarding the pump station upgrade, City Attorney Cherof advised that even though this was incorporated in the ordinance, the comment still needs to be included It will end up being satisfied immediately upon the adoption of the ordinance if that language is changed Motion Commissioner Titcomb moved to approve, subject to the conditions in Exhibit 0, and also the condition that the use on the master plan for these lots be changed to office Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz seconded the motion, which carried 5-0 Description Quantum Park PID James G Willard, Shutts & Bowen Quantum Associates West side of the intersection of Interstate 95 and Gateway Boulevard Master Plan Modification Request to amend the previously approved PID master plan in connection with an amendment to the DRI to add 13 17 acres (the PCD Center subdivision) to the PIO boundaries and change the use designation from office to commercial/industrial use, add the option of commercial use to the existing B Project Name Agent Owner Location 34 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 use designated for lots 65A, 65B, 66, 67 A, 67B, 67C, 68A, 68B, 69, 70, 72, 73A, 73B, 74 - 79,83 - 85 and 91, and change the use designation of lots 58,59,60 and 61 from commercial to industrial/research and development/office See discussion under Item VIII.A. Ms Heyden stated that all the points discussed this evening have been worked out, except for the floating commercial We agreed to a maximum of 47 acres, however, 83 acres are still shown on the master plan Mayor Taylor wanted the commercial moved when projects come in Mr Willard said there is only one master plan right now We have proposed an area of approximately 80 acres within which we could have 47 acres of commercial By adding the 30 acres maximum in the notes we have the assurance that just because we have commercial identified as a permitted use, it is maxed out at 30 acres Mayor Taylor asked why Mr Willard wants to show 83 acres Mr Willard referred to the lots that are presently zoned commercial and said that is one area where he does not believe will be commercial He agreed to designate six or seven lots that add up to 30 acres and put in the note that at the discretion of the City Commission, the location of commercial lots could be reconfigured, subject to City Commission approval City Manager Parker said in other words, identify 30 acres around the Car Max and the Commission could approve or disapprove specific lots for commercial as users come in Commissioner Bradley said because we are asked if it is necessary to designate some tonight Mr Willard did not think so Mayor Taylor did not un Mr Willard said the existing plan shows all the commercial lots on Quantum Lakes Drive The only permitted use is commercial If we move the commercial, we have no other permitted land uses on those lots City Manager Parker advised Mr Willard that we can add the land uses on those lots this evening the proposal is to leave the designation of these lots in red as commercial with a notation saying that the location of the commercial can be reconfigured subject to city Commission approval It is difficult to market lots on 1-95 or near this intersection We figure the Car Max is going to be the catalyst that would promote some commercial development along 1-95 35 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2,1996 Mayor Taylor had no objection to letting Mr Willard put 30 acres of commercial where he wants to, but he did not want to see 80 acres of commercial on the plan Mr Willard designated the following lots as commercial 81,82,91, 67B, 65A and B, 64 and 63 He said he will delete the reference to commercial from all the other lots The previously designated commercial lots will be designated as industrial and office A notation will be added about the flexibility of moving the commercial around, plus the limitation of 47 acres total In a discussion with Mr Stewart and Ms Heyden, we noted that there is a discrepancy in the reference to the square footage on industrial, so we are proposing to reduce that 4,443,120 to 2,784,354 The reason for that is that it reflects square footage attributable to the acres that wound up being included for the high school site In order not to alter the vested trip generation that we have in Palm Beach County, we will add a line saying that the vested trips for the project shall remain at 63,752 The only other changes to the ordinance other than those previously discussed, There is one other request that Mr Steward requested which we are agreeable to making in the end of paragraph 3, section 2 of the ordinance, which deals with what happens if the intersection of Park Ridge and Gateway were to exceed 2,300 peak hour trips, it would require further approval by the city, and we are going to add the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the DCA. Also, the ordinance would reflect the amendments that I discussed in my earlier presentation Motion Commissioner Bradley moved to find that the proposed changes do not constitute a substantial deviation under Florida Statutes, that no further DRI review is necessary, that the revised master plan does not constitute a substantial change, and that an amendment to the development order, which is the ordinance on tonight's agenda, be issued subject to the revisions that Mr Willard discussed with the Commission Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz seconded the motion, which carried 5-0 City Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinance 96-33 by title only Motion Commissioner Titcomb moved to approve Proposed Ordinance No 96-33 on first reading Commissioner Bradley seconded the motion A roll call vote was polled by the City Clerk The motion carried 5-0 VIII DEVELOPMENT PLANS C Project Quantum Park PID 36 MINUTES CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 2, 1996 Description James G Willard Quantum Associates West side of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road Use Approval Request to amend the list of permitted uses for the Quantum Corporate Park PID to allow used and new car sales on commercially designated lots within the PID Agent Owner. Location See discussion under Item VIII A. Motion Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz moved to approve the request to amend the list of permitted uses for the Quantum Corporate Park PID to allow used and new car sales on commercially designated lots within the PID, subject to staff comments Commissioner Tillman seconded the motion In response to Mayor Taylor regarding the specific lots, Ms Heyden advised that this specifically refers to lots 76,77,78,79, and 80 Regarding the staff comments on Exhibit G, staff comments 1 through 8 and then two additional comments from the Planning and Development Board Ms Heyden advised that Mr Willard and she have agreed to delete Planning and Development Board comment number 2 on Exhibit G, which reinstates comment number 7 of the staff comments This pertains to the issue Commissioner Bradley brought up regarding the greenbelt They have agreed to turn in that greenbelt comprehensive plan prior to the site plan approval for Car Max rather than the 90 days, in the event the site plan comes in before 90 days In that case, City Attorney Cheraf stated that comment number 2 would be rejected Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz restated the motion Motion Restated Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz moved to approve the request to amend the list of permitted uses for the Quantum Corporate Park PID to allow used and new car sales on commercial designated lots within the PID, subject to staff comments Commissioner Tillman seconded the motion, which carried 5-0 City Attorney Cherof thanked Mr Stewart for coming from Tallahassee to this meeting 37 MEETING Mlt<-... TES SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25, 1996 Knuth Road PCD Major Site Plan Modification for Signage - This board's recommendation regardrng curved tops for all signs and substituting Sign Band 0 to lower the size of the sign was approved by the City CommIssion Discussion Item Relating to Telecommunications Ordinance - This Ordinance was scheduled for second reading at the last City Commission meeting It is being readvertised and will be back before the City Commission on July 2 With regard to this item, the Planning and Development Board discussed the possibility of a half-mile radius or a one-mile radius between poles Ms Heyden mapped this, and found that a one-mile radius was very, very large Her recommendation is for as half-mile radius Mr Aguila questioned whether when it was mapped out, there would still be room for a "toothpick factory" Ms Heyden responded that there are a lot of sites, but this use is subject to conditional use approval The sites are scattered and some are as close a one- quarter mile apart 6. OLD BUSINESS. None 7 NEW BUSINESS. A. SUBDIVISION Master Plan Modification 1 Project: Location Agent: Owner' Description Quantum Park PID West side of the intersection of Interstate 95 and Gateway Boulevard James Willard, Shutts & 80wen Quantum Associates Request to amend the previously-approved PID master plan in connection with an amendment to the DRI to add 13 17 acres (the PCD Center subdivision) to the PID boundaries and change the use designation from office to commercial/Industrial use, add the option of commercial use to the existing use designated for lots 65A, 658, 66, 67A, 678, 67C, 68A, 688, 69, 70, 72, 3 --- -----~- MEETING MINU", ~5 SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25, 1996 73A, 738, 74-79. 83-85, and 91, and change the use designation of lots 58, 59, 60, and 61 from Commercial to Industrial/Research and Development/Office James Willard. Attornev for Quantum Associates, introduced Steve Godfrey of Kimley- Horn Mr Godfrey is Quantum Associates' transportation expert and the analyst who prepared the traffic report Unlike the previous matters previously addressed by this board which dealt with the use approval for the CarMax site and the rezoning of the three lots coming into Quantum Park, there are three pnmary objectives to the DRI amendment request 1 The first objective is to bring the three lots into the DRI that were the subject to the rezoning and use approval These are Lots 80,81, and 82 2 The second objective is relative to Quantum Associates' desire to relocate and expand the land area on which commercial development would be a permitted use Mr Willard displayed three charts One of the charts reflected the existing master site development plan for Quantum Park as currently approved The last approval date was October 28, 1994 which was when the school site was approved Highlighted in red on that chart was the location of the existing lots on which commercial use is a permitted use On the same chart, the cross-hatching indicates the lots which have office and hotel as permitted uses The second chart reflected the applicant's request. This request involves a relocation of the commercial area of Quantum Park from the area on Quantum Lakes Drive into an area which IS the 1-95 frontage and around the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Park Ridge Road This chart showed three of the lots highlighted in red which were already zoned commercial from the existing approval, four lots highlighted in yellow indicating the CarMax project, and the additional lots involved in the request. In response to Mr Aguila's question, Mr Willard explained that the first chart indicates 297 acres of commercial The second chart proposes 70 to 80 acres of commercial The third chart identified the land use type and amount of density of approved land uses per the 1984 approved DRI/ADA. The square footages indicated are as follows . Industrial Commercial Office Hotel 4,443,120 square feet 426,888 square feet 1,685,772 square feet 400 rooms . . . 4 MEETING MINUTES SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25, 1996 It came to the applicant's attention during discussions with the Regional Planning Council that they wanted these square footages utilized in the transportation analysis when projecting buildout of the entire park, how many trips and what kind of land use category it comes from The applicant went back to the original DRI as opposed to taking acres of land and multiplying it by the highest FAR (Floor Area Ratio) The square footages shown are reflected in the transportation analysIs, and the applicant is In agreement with recognizing them as the maximum permitted categories of those land use types In the Development Order 3 The third objective of the amendment is to comply with a requirement In the 1994 Development Order that requests the applicant to come back and do a traffic analysis of the intersection at Gateway Boulevard and Park Ridge Road Mr Willard read the following from the City Ordinance which was adopted two years ago when the high school use was approved and a DRI amendment was prepared "As part of the next DRI amendment, the developer agrees to perform a transportation analysis of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road. That analysis shall be based upon the most-recently proposed land uses within the DRI and shall be acceptable to the City, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, and the DCA. If the transportation analysis projects a deficient level of service at the intersection, the developer shall perform such mitigation as necessary to bring the intersection up to an acceptable level of service Such mitigation may include intersection improvements or preferably, additional roadway access to Gateway Boulevard for the lots in the southeast portion of the project." The reason this was included in the DRI amendment is that when the high school was approved, it required an elimination of a section of Park Ridge Road What was a loop will become a cul-de-sac when that section of the road is eliminated There was a concern over the traffic implications of that elimination of roadway In order to accommodate the School Board, the traffic analysis was postponed until the next DRI amendment The primary focus of the report was to analyze the impacts of closing the road, determine if there is enough access to Gateway Boulevard, and what might have to be done to improve the performance of the intersection Mr Willard explained that the City Commission, as the local government, issues the Development Orders and determines what is approved in a DRI The Regional Planning Council acts as a clearinghouse to coordinate input and comments from any agency having an interest in commenting on the DRI The Department of Community Affairs is the only agency that can appeal a decision of the City The applicant can also appeal the City's 5 MEETING MINU) ...5 SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25, 1996 deCISion The application for an amendment to the DRI was sent to the Regional Planning Council which will coordinate comments from Palm Beach County, FOOT and DCA The applicant has been dealing with the Regional Planning Council, Palm Beach County, FOOT and the City The applicant has been In touch with DCA. Their pnmary concern relates to traffic They are awaiting comments from FOOT The purpose of getting all of the comments IS to provide Input so that the City can evaluate and make a determrnation It IS not necessary to have a consensus by all of the commenting agencies Mr Willard does not believe there wIll be any objection to the applicant's first objective to add Lots 80, 81, and 82 to the DRI Mr Willard explained that what Quantum is trying to achieve is greater flexibility in marketing the property There was a total of 426,888 square feet originally approved for the DRI The applicant proposed to adhere to that ceiling The Regional Planning Council believes that the originally-approved hotel square footage (400 rooms) is incorporated Into the commercial number The converSion ratio is 268 square feet per room If 400 rooms were built, that would amount to slightly more than 100,000 square feet which would be applied against the cap The applicant agrees with that. Quantum is hopeful that there will be one, or possibly two hotels bUIlt somewhere near the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and 1-95 Quantum is attempting to relocate the commercial to the area where they feel commercial is Inclined to be concentrated They do not believe it is in the area along Quantum Lakes Drive It is unknown why the commercial was located in that area. The most likely place for commercial to take place would be in the area proposed in order to take advantage of 1-95 visibility and the activity around the intersection With this change, there will be over 200 acres left in Quantum Park for industrial and research and development. With the anticipated development of CarMax, Quantum would like the flexibility of accommodating commercial users should they wish to locate in Quantum No users have yet been identified Steve Godfrev. reaistered Professional Engineer. Kimlev-Horn & Associates. explained that the Development Order specifies what the traffic study was to undertake Because of the cutting of Park Ridge Road, there was only one access available for the eastern portion of the southern part of the development. The goal was to identify to what extent the existing intersection would accommodate the proposed development. If that was not adequate, it would be necessary to identify the improvements needed and the timing for those improvements During the study, it was found that the intersection, as it currently exists, will need improvements However, it is an adequate intersection for access for the site Two studies were conducted Each of the studies targeted the same purpose of evaluating the 6 MEETING MINUTES SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25, 1996 Intersection Both studies used different methodologies, but both came to the same conclusion The original study did not conform to the way some of the reviewing agencies prefer to see the study done The applicant took advice from the Regional Planning Council in terms of the method they like, and from the Department of Transportation In terms of trip generation rates. As a result of application of the process, the applIcant identified improvements that are needed for the intersection It is important to note that the land use that has been evaluated in the analysis IS the one listed on the charts The traffic study includes the effects and impacts of the full amount of development. Mr Godfrey advised that the transportation study indicated that in order to accommodate the proposed land use, the flexibility proposed in the plan, and the limitation of one access point on Gateway Boulevard, the following is necessary 1 At 1 ,200 peak hour trips, a southbound dual left must be provided This would be coming from the north, heading south going toward 1-95 This is a simple project which includes restriping existing pavement to make two left- turn lanes. 2. At 1,300 peak hour trips, it will be necessary to provide a second right turn lane in the northbound direction The right-of-way is available The developer owns the property and can make those improvements 3 The next improvement would be the addition of a southbound right turn lane, at 1 ,935 peak hour trips, coming from the north heading south This will take the project to 2,300 peak hour trips. These are trips associated with Park Ridge Road. The applicant has created a scenario of levels of development which is dependent on access in this location, and determined at what total number of trips the improvements are required to make the intersection work. The analysis is conservative because it incJudes a significant amount of thru-traffic growth on Gateway The applicant has been undertaking coordination with the review agencies as it relates to the studies. The applicant learned of concerns relative to the first study, and responded to those concerns in the second study The first study was provided in April, and the new study was provided on June 10, 1996 On June 19, the County provided a letter expressing continued concern The County was contacted the following day and the applicant learned about their concerns. The County looks at the changes from a single perspective as it relates to their authority Under the Traffic Performance Standards, the issue is whether or not this proposed project 7 MEETING MINL _S SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25,1996 will generate more trips than what was approved The plan is that It will not generate more tripS The existing entitlements will not change Mr Aguila questioned whether or not an argument exists based on the fact that by concentrating so much potential commercial use to that one intersection, more traffic may not be created In the entire Park, but the traffic demand is Intensified at that one Intersection The suggested Improvements may not be sufficient to deal with that intersection so close to 1-95 Mr Godfrey said that by locating the commercial in this location, the Regional Planning Council transportation consultant suggested that the orientation of the commercial may be more toward 1-95 than jf it were in the original location As a result, when the study was updated, the applicant assumed that a significant increase In activity would occur between the area and 1-95 There will not be more trips through the intersection than there would have been However, there will be a change in traffic pattern That change In traffic pattern (or Intensification) has been taken into consideration In evaluating the intersection In addition, there is an extra margin included because the applicant Included the impact of the hotel square footage in the analysis. That impact no longer exists because it is already Included in the commercial square footage. Vice Chairman Golden noted that it appears the relocation of the commercial along the 1-95 corridor would attract more external trips Mr Godfrey agreed that this is a possibility However, he feels it depends on who the ultimate users are in the location In the case of the analysis, no internal capture was taken All of the commercial activity that is being generated IS traveling through the intersection and leaving the development. Mr Godfrey advised that in updating the analysis, consideration was given to DOT's comments. Mr Willard met with DOT and they have not had an opportunity to review the June 10 report. They are working on it now There were discussions relative to what was addressed, their concerns, and the approach that was taken They were in agreement with the concept of the approach that was taken Treasure Coast recommended the revised methodology to the applicant. The applicant FAXED the revised report to their consultant for review before finalizing it to make sure that they were addressing Treasure Coast's concerns Their consultant is still in the review process All of the agencies that are reviewing thiS proposal will agree that the improvements recommended, and the staging recommended, will.provide the desired and appropriate level of service at the intersection to prOVide an adequate access. Mr Willard distributed an alternative version of a motion for approval to make it easy for the members to review the differences between what the applicant is seeking versus what staff recommends. (A copy of that material is attached to the original set of minutes on file In the City Clerk's Office) 8 ---~_._---- MEETING MINU I es SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25,1996 Mr Willard explained that in order to implement the requested amendment, another Ordmance must be passed The application process requires submittal of a proposed Ordinance Mr Willard reviewed the packet contalnmg the draft Ordinance which was part of the June 11 submittal He asked the members to look at Page 3, Section 2 which Identifies the tenns of the requested proposal ParaaraDh 1 recites that Lots 80, 81, and 82 are hereby added and incorporated into the ORI (ThiS was the first objective he spoke of earlier) Paraaraph 2 incorporates, by reference, master plan amendment #6 ThiS refers to Chart #2 which Mr Willard had on display This chart contains the descriptions of the land use classifications Paraaraph 3 includes the trigger for making sure the intersection Improvements are performed. It references the Kimley-Horn study and lists the intersection improvements as that portion of the project served by Park Ridge Road exceeds certain trip generation levels, Paragraph 3 continues to list the different levels and Identifies the necessary improvements to be made Since the June 11 proposed Development Order was drafted, and as a result of the staff report, discussions with other agencies including the Regional Planning Council and the letter received today from them, Mr Willard commented on additional terms he agreed to incorporate into the proposed Development Order' 1 Lots #53 and 54 were bought by the School Board and mistakenly not labeled Government and Institutional That has been changed 2 This is a mechanism for letting the City know how many trips are going on and when the improvements are needed The appic:ant has proposed a mechanism whereby, "Concurrently with the submittal of a building permit application for any lot, the applicant must submit, in writing to the City, an indication of the number of trips being generated by any use on any of the lots (commercial or otherwise) For any lot on which commercial is an approved use and it is served by Park Ridge Road access, the applicant must provide information on how many trips will be generated and the impact of the cumulative number of trips every time a building permit application is submitted 3 At the request of the Regional Planning Council, the applicant shaded in the area of Park Ridge Road that will be closed 9 MEETING MINU'I _$ SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25, 1996 when the high school IS built The shading carried over slightly too far The applicant will cut back approxImately 1Js" so that the cul-de-sac between Lots #45A and #46A stays open to public traffic. 4 With respect to any commercial development proposed on Gateway Boulevard, the applicant will not increase the number of freestanding signs above one per lot, or the number of access points to Gateway Boulevard than is currently anticipated (one access point per lot with cross access encouraged). The applicant will try to beef up landscaping on any commercial use on Gateway As a result of the Regional Planning Council letter to Ms. Heyden, there were three recommendations One recommendation dealt with parcels 53 and 54 That has been addressed The second recommendation is that the hotel use should not be considered a separate use, but part of the commercial The applicant will add a term in this regard The third recommendation requires that the maximum square footage for the development (industrial, commercial and office) be identified on the face of the master plan The applicant has done that for commercIal, but will add office and industrial as well The applicant requests approval of the proposed Development Order as modified Mr Aguila stated that he does not object to the relocation of the commercial areas from the originally-intended areas. However, he pointed out that at the present time, he enjoys the view along 1-95 because the Quantum Park side of the highway looks so nice He envisions that this proposal could cause a degradation of that area so that it will look disastrous Although the applicant is willing to limit the signage to one sign per site, Mr Aguila would prefer that the signs would be one freestanding sign per site on the main road access way (High Ridge Road or Park Ridge Road) He does not want to drive along 1-95 and have to view groups of open bays, lots of activity, and lots of roll-up doors with Industrial uses. He is concerned that by concentrating all of that potential commercial activity along this corridor, that is what we will wind up with In addition, Mr Aguila is not convinced on the traffic issue at the intersection of High Ridge and Gateway He feels it will be a nightmare There are only 600 or 700' from the exit of 1-95 to that intersection Everyone going into that area will go through that intersection and leave from that intersection When the road is closed off because the school is built, Mr Aguila does not believe that intersection will be adequate for access. He questioned whether any consideration was given to opening up along the side of the Publix tract (Lot 55), going across the lake and out to Quantum Lakes Drive Mr Willard said that Issue arose two years ago when the high school proposal came 10 MEETING MINUTES SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25,1996 through The Fire Department raised the issue relative to emergency access Mr Willard explained that Mr Aguila's suggestion IS not possible because the applicant does not own or control that property The likelihood of Publix or the School Board donating land to bUild a road IS not feasible Mr Aguila questioned whether it would be phYSically possible to put In a road Mr Willard did not have an answer to that question however, he said this suggestion has been looked at because the question has been asked At the map, he Indicated the Publix lot, and the lake It would be necessary to take off from Park Ridge Boulevard, through the Publix property around the lake, and either stay within the Publix property or go through part of the School Board lots, go around another lake and tie into Quantum Lakes Drive Mr Willard does not believe this is a feasible alternative In addition, nothing in the traffic analysis indicates a requirement for such a decision Projected buildout of all of the square footages says the traffic can be accommodated with the Improvements identified by the applicant. Twenty-three hundred (2,300) peak hour trips become a self-enforcing constraint on the developer Once the intersection is maxed out, the developer cannot sell the remaining land Mr Aguila agreed that Mr Willard's point is defendable He still has concerns about how the concentration of commercial use will aesthetically affect the 1-95 corridor In addition, staff has concerns about further subdivision of the lots Mr Willard feels the 1-95 frontage will attract wholesale type users similar to CarMax These will be destination type uses The developer does not anticipate further subdivision of the lots because of the nature of the users. On Gateway Boulevard, it is possible that a retail user may not want 2% or 3 acres. If any of the lots are subdivided, it will be one of the lots on Gateway This is another reason why sign control and limited access are important. Mr Aguila pointed out that although the developer agrees to limited access and limited signage, Item #4b of the motion says there will be one access point per lot. If the lot is subdivided into two lots, there could be two accesses and the applicant would be in compliance Mr Willard said that was not his intention If one of the lots is subdivided, there will be one joint access point required (internal driveway to come out of the same point with an ingress/egress easement common to both) Mr Willard said Item #4b can be changed to reflect his intention Mr Willard added that if there are two users on a lot, there will be one sign with two panels and one driveway The limitation is to have one access point and one sign per land area comprised of the existing lot dimensions as they are today With regard to the comment about the aesthetics of the 1-95, if this land is not commercial, an industrial or office user could go in and build it out. There is no specific sign control presently He recommended that for commercIal users on lots fronting 1-95, other than I I MEETING MINU I ~S SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25, 1996 CarMax sign control should be made a condition of site plan approval that comes back before the board with a limited conditional use The landscapmg can be handled the same way Landscaping and signage create the view to the traveling public Ms Heyden confirmed that site plans come to the Planning and Development Board However, she feels the standards need to be set now when there IS control Mr Aguila explained that it IS difficult to set standards for appropriate landscapmg or sign age without seeing what will be done on the site Ms Heyden advised that landscaping will be taken care of when the City gets the greenbelt plan Mr Willard explained that those plans will allow design flexibility so that when a user comes In, the greenbelt can be customized to the particular use Mr Aguila pointed out that there still must be an element within the greenbelt to tie all of Quantum Park together Mr Willard agreed with that remark. Mr Aguila IS comfortable with Mr Willard's concession on the signage and landscaping Mr Willard explained that if there is a notation of specific City interest and approval on landscaping and signage for any commercIal use fronting 1-95 In the Ordinance adopting an amendment to the DRI, It means more than if it IS buried in the Landscape Code Mr Aguila suggested the notation be for any commercIal use--not just those fronting 1-95 Ms Heyden said there is an approved sign program for this project. There are freestanding signs which are monument signs for each individual user along the frontage ThiS addresses the frontage of 1-95 until the City receives a sign program amendment. Mr Willard said the applicant does not envision or recommend pylon signs along 1-95 Monument signs and facade signage is okay CarMax is looking for identification, and will wind up proposing some type of major Quantum identification sign with two or three panels It will say "Quantum Park" and CarMax will get the top panel There is a prohibition on pole signs for industrial users Vice Chairman Golden feels the comments relative to the design issues are appropriate In addition, there are two other major concerns The first concern is the number of outstanding impact issues which need to be fully resolved. Those issues are raised in staff's report and the comments from the external agencies Vice Chairman Golden feels this forum may not be appropriate to review all of these impacts He feels this should be going to a substantial deviation review for a more full-blown analysis of these impacts. The City Commission will have to decide on this request. He pointed out that this proposal has exposed some of the problems with the high school being incorporated in the Park. Those problems focus on traffic, the closure of Park Ridge Boulevard, and increased traffic at the intersection of High Ridge Road and Quantum Boulevard He is in agreement with staff that there could be negative consequences by relocating the commercial usage to the 1-95 12 MEETING MINUTES SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25, 1996 frontage This may anract users that are strip-type commercial rather than ancillary to the Park. Vice Chairman Golden feels this IS a major change to the master plan The comments about design gUidelines may be appropriate, and we should look at them more closely Mr Rosenstock questioned whether or not staff has made any recommendations relative to the design guidelines He was dIrected to Comment #12 of the staff report Mr Willard explamed that subparagraphs c, e, and f are incorporated m the motion he prepared However, he requested that the applicant not be held to subparagraphs a b andd Vice Chairman Golden referred to Comment #10 on Page 7 of staff's report This comment is made by the City Forester Some of the lots that are proposed for additlonai commercial usage back up to the Sand Pine Preserve If there IS an Impact on the Preserve, this would be grounds for substantial deviation review Mr Willard stated that the applicant is aware that such an impact would be a substantial deviation However, regardless of the nature of the land use, there would not be a detrimental impact on the Sand Pine Preserve Furthermore, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council has not raised this as a concern to date Mr Aguila felt this was a "blanket-type comment" and agreed that there is no indication that the Sand Pine Preserve would be impacted Vice Chairman Golden further referred to the first two paragraphs on Page 6 of the staff report. The first paragraph says" further development of regional impact review is required before the proposed amendment can be determined as not being a substantial deviation ", and then the second paragraph says, " it is recommended that the determination be made that the changes are substantial in nature unless the conditions listed below are incorporated into the Ordinance amending the Development Order " He asked Ms. Heyden for clarification of these statements. Ms. Heyden explained that we are dealing with the City's master plan amendment process and the Regional Planning Council's DRI amendment. The first paragraph relates to the DRt, and the second paragraph retates to the master plan She explained that she did not have the benefit of staff comments from the agencies. From the comments Ms Heyden received from Treasure Coast today, a determination can be made that further DRI review is necessary She stands by her comments related to traffic. Once that issue is resolved, no further DRI review is necessary On the local issue, without the conditions 1-12, Ms Heyden believes this is a major change to the original master plan Vice Chairman Golden believes that Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering feels there 13 MEETING MINUi -.;:) SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25, 1996 are stili Impact Issues that must be resolved Ms Heyden stated that DCA will object unless the traffic Issue is resolved Mr Aguila feels the traffic issue is something which can be resolved He questioned whether gross square footage was used Mr Willard responded affirmatively Ms Heyden questIoned why Mr Willard did not include Comment #1 in his amendment If he used gross square footage Mr Willard explained that this is already contained In the Statute Knowing that the DRI amendment process must take place by Ordinance, he would like to try to limit the conditions contained in the Ordinance amending the DRI to major regional issues that affect the project. Less significant issues can be left to a local form Mr Aguila Inquired about the regulations that affect this PIO Ms. Heyden said the master plan regulates the PID The DRI requirements have less information on them than we reqUire Mr Willard reviewed the comments in the staff report Comment #1 - Mr Willard explained that the way trip generation is calculated, there IS gross square footage and gross leasable area (GLA) For commercial, the standard used is gross leasable area. Ms Heyden advised that Comment #1 came from the Treasure Coast Traffic Engineer In addition, Palm Beach County uses gross square footage in their analyses. She does not want to encounter a problem because the applicant is using gross leasable area when the City is looking for gross square footage Mr Willard said that when a land plan is given to a traffic engineer to determine the traffic generation, the gross square footage is converted to gross leasable area. That is the area that generates the trips. Comment #1 is correct for industrial, office, and any non- commercial, but the term is gross leasable area for commercial Mr Godfrey advised that the Planning Council uses the same book he used to make his determination However, Ms. Heyden explained that the City relies on Palm Beach County to do its traffic study She will consult with the County Mr Willard pointed out that this is not a relevant issue at this point because it goes to the traffic report This is not an issue that needs to be in the Ordinance on the DRI amendment. Mr Godfrey reported that he has had discussions with County staff, and their position IS simple The only roll the County plays is to get involved if the project generates more trips 14 MEETING MINUTES SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25, 1996 than it IS approved to generate. A determination must be made regarding whether this project will keep the number of trips at the approved level He explained that there is no proposed change, and there will be no traffic generation for the project, therefore, the County IS not involved The project will not have any new trips, and the City will get a letter from the County stating they have no Involvement. Mr Rosenstock pointed out that this project could be approved pending that confirmation from the County Comment #2 - Mr Willard asked that the applicant not be restricted to 29 7 acres Ms. Heyden feels this is the most important issue other than traffic CarMax will have a small building with a lot of acreage If there are many of those kinds of uses, they could use up the acreage limitation, but not reach the square footage limitation The impact is that there could be more commercial than was originally envisioned in the DRI because there would be more lots with commercial on them If this is limited to the square footage and not the 29 7 acres, the amount of commercial could be doubled Mr Willard stated that is exactly what the applicant would like to have He would like the flexibility to have more commercial acres so that they do not exceed the square footages originally projected Mr Rosenstock expressed concern that the square footage will be used up with a very low assessed valuation encompassing the square footage as opposed to buildings on it with higher valuation per occupied square foot. Mr Willard said Quantum Associates wants to market land and sell it. Even though CarMax will take up 45,000 square foot and up 14 acres of land, it is not assessed on the square footage of only the building Notwithstanding the tax assessed value of the property, the applicant recognizes that they may have 30, 40, or 50 acres of commercIal land and not exceed the cap. That is the reason why they have a larger area outlined in red on the chart where they can locate the square footage They are of the opinion that circumstances demand the change Mr Wische pointed out that many of the members of the board attended the Visions 20/20 Conference He noted that the word "flexibility" had been used many times this evening He referred to the report issued following the Visions 20/20 Conference where there are references to the fact that the City's development approval process is not flexible enough to attract future development in the City He quoted other statements from the report which referred to flexibility He said that from what he is hearing this evening, we are not trying to help. Instead, we are hindering development. He recommended that the board approve this project subject to the submittal of favorable reports being received from the agencies The applicant has addressed everything The applicant is trying to establish a tract and 15 MEETING MINU'I_o) SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25, 1996 get it moving They have hired influential marketing people CarMax could be the catalyst for Quantum Park. Mr Lee feels they can work out all Issues once all of the reports are received He suggests passing thIs on to the CommissIon based on some of Mr Aguila's comments regarding the 1-95 frontage Ms Heyden expressed concern about the 29 7 acres because of the Impact on other commercial areas In the City Visions 20/20 also talked about the revitalization of Federal Highway By creating commercIal In Quantum Park, we will be taking It away from other areas in the City There are 500 000 square feet of approved unconstructed commercial area on Congress Avenue The City has given time extensions time and time again to those projects Mr Wische pointed out that Quantum Park has been zoned for industrial for six years and they were unable to attract anyone ChaIrman Dube requested that the applicant return to the review of staff's comments He realized that the applicant wants Comment #2 removed Comment #3 - Mr Willard has complied with this comment. Comment #4 - Mr Willard explained that the first part of the comment refers to Lots #40 and #41 A These lots have a dual government and institution, and research and development classifications. These lots are subject to a School Board option Mr Rosenstock questioned whether Mr Willard would be amenable to reducing the 426 888 square feet by the amount of unoccupied space (asphalt) on the CarMax property Mr Willard responded negatively Mr Rosenstock pointed out that if Mr Willard took that square footage of asphalt off the 426,888 square feet, Ms Heyden's concern would be addressed Ms Heyden explained that the reason the square footage was added to the ADA is that the traffic engineers need square footage to study traffic. The City set up a master plan That acreage for commercial is then converted to square footage to determine the limitation on the square footage It would go against the original intent of the project to now go back and take the one which is greater Comment #5 - Mr Willard stated that he will get final comments before the City Commission meeting next week. Unless DCA appeals because of the traffic issue, the applicant will have the comments and they can be evaluated It is not relevant if they agree with the traffic analysis The focus of the traffic study was to identify improvements to the intersection That has been done Comment #6 - was addressed, 16 - MEETING MINUTES SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25,1996 Comment #7 - The applicant has submitted a utility analysIs Mr Godfrey added that Kimley-Horn responded today WIth an additional analysis and found that the lift station has more than adequate capacity Comment #8 - was addressed with respect to the desire for the road connection However, it cannot be accomplished Comment #9 - has been addressed and is on the proposal Comment #10 - deals with the Sand Pine Preserve, and the applicant does not beheve there will be any impact on that preserve Comment #11 - is the converse of Comment #12 Ms. Heyden recommended that commercial usage be allowed only on the lots that CarMax is interested in That amount will then be subtracted from the total 29 7 acres You take out the option of all other lots and restore Lot #61 as commercial Mr Willard IS not agreeable with that recommendation Comment #12c. e. and f are incorporated into the proposal subject to clarification Comment 12a - The applicant would prefer not to comply with "a" They do not know why the lots were platted. Every lot may wind up being subdivided at some pomt In time The applicant does not want to be constrained Comment 12b - Mr Willard stated that the likelihood of the type of commercial that will be attracted to Quantum Park is not the strip-type commercial one would find on Federal Highway or Congress Avenue The applicant feels there will be single users, but there are concepts with two users in one building. They do not want to be restricted to single-use buildings This issue can be addressed at site plan Comment 12d - This is the same as Comment 12b Ms. Heyden is concerned that there will be carved up lots. However, Mr Aguila feels that what makes this different is that Quantum Park is like a home You go there because there is a level of quality you expect to be provided to the public. That mentality tends not to exist on Congress Avenue He thinks the character of the potential tenant is a different caliber than what we see on Federal Highway or Congress Avenue Motion Mr Aguila moved to approve Quantum Associates' request to amend the previously- approved PIO master plan in connection with an amendment to the ORI to add 13 17 acres 17 MEETING MINUTe;:; SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25, 1996 (the PCO Center subdivision) to the PIO boundaries and change the use desIgnation from office to commercial/Industrial use, add the option of commercial use to the existing use designated for lots 65A, 65B, 66, 67A, 678, 67C 68A, 68B, 69,70,72, 73A, 73B, 74-79, 83-85 and 91 and change the use designation of lots 58, 59, 60, and 61 from Commercial to Industrial/Research and Development/Office subject to the following 1 Compliance with recommendations In staff report, Comments 1-12 as amended, 2 Comment #2 of the developer's submitted motion recommendations which reads, "Concurrently With the submittal of a building permit application for any lot for which commercial development is a permitted use pursuant to the Master Site Development Plan (regardless of whether the proposed use IS commercial or another permitted land use), the applicant shall Indicate In wnting to the City the number of p.m peak hour vehicle trips estimated to be generated by the proposed building improvement and also the aggregate peak hour trip generation for all lots served by Park Ridge Boulevard, 3 Comment #4 as modified, i e., if lots are subdivided, signs and access points will be shared, 4 That the hotel area is part of the 426.888 gross square feet. 5 That all agreed capacities be identified on the master plan, 6 Delete Items #8, 10, and 11 of staff's recommendations, and 7 That all traffic concerns be successfully resolved with the proper agencies Mr Wische seconded the motion Mr Aguila clarified that his Comment #4 implies that by approving the applicant's request the applicant is not limited to the 29 7 acres. Amendment to the Motion Mr Aguila moved to amend the motion to include that in staff's recommendation (Item #2) commercial use shall be limited to 426,888 gross square feet and that there be no acreage Mr Wische seconded the amendment. The motion carried 6-1 (Vice Chairman Golden dissented) Chairman Dube advised Mr Willard that the City Commissioners read the minutes of this board's meeting. and listen to the tapes He recommended that the presenter not go 18 MEETING MINUTES SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 25, 1996 through his presentation point by pOint. He urged Mr Willard to allow the Commissioners to guide hIm in providing clarification Mr Rosenstock suggested that Mr Willard cover all arguments during hIs presentation to the Commission Ms. Heyden asked for clarification on a portion of the motion She was of the opinion that Items 12a, band d were included as well as 12c, e and f Mr Aguila explained that when he made the motion, he did not mention Items 12a, b, and d It was his intent to delete Items 12a, band d Motion Mr Aguila moved that staff recommendation on Page 7, Items #12a, b, and d be omitted and not be required as part of this approval Mr Wische seconded the motion which carried 6-1 (Vice Chairman Golden dissented) 8. COMMENTS BY MEMBERS. Chairman Dubs advised that he received a copy of the minutes of the last CRAB meeting At that meeting, there was nothing for the board to consider They have now made a motion to suspend all future meetings until such time as they are called for a meeting It is Chairman Dubs's opinion that the Planning and Development Board has far more expertise than the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board. He would like to approach the City Commission to request that the CRAB responsibility be shifted to the Planning and Development Board The CRAB can then be dissolved. Ms Heyden has not objected to adding any CRAB items to the Planning and Development Board agenda if a decision to dissolve the board is made 9. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the board, the meeting properly adjourned at 9:25 p.m ~~ai~~ Recording Secretary (Three Tapes) 19 /'\ I . ' /2' L:7 (~ / .....- ~ APPLICANT'S PROPOSED MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE NOTIFICATION OF PROPOSED CHANGE (NOPC) TO THE QUANTUM PARK DRI BE IT MOVED, that the Planning and Development Commission approves the requested changes to the Quantum Park DRI as set forth in the draft Ordinance dated June 11, 1996, submitted by the applicant as Exhibit "0" to the Notification of Proposed Change (copy attached), subject to the following additional terms and conditions 4/ (/ Lots 53 and 54 shall be designated for use as "G & I" (Governmental and Institutional) c Concurrently with the submittal of a building p rmit application for any lot for which commerc a opment is a permitted use pursuant to the Master Site Development Plan (regardless of whether the proposed use is commercial or another permitted land use), the applicant shall indicate in writing to the City the number of PM peak hour vehicle trips estimated to be generated by the proposed building improvement and also the aggregate peak hour trip generation for all lots served by Park Ridge Boulevard ~ f ~ '"Revi!le Lhe shat1ed d..1.~a~e roadway at Lot 45A;:a '- ~A~permit public access to the existing cul-de-sac 1 i with respect to any commercial development along Gateway Boulevard, the following conditions shall apply a. There shall be no increase in the number of free standing signs than is currently permitted (i e one per lot) ! b There shall be no increase in the number - oints onto Gateway Boulevard than ~ 4_~ ticipated (i.e one access point per f~~. ss access encouraged) I c. Landscaping in excess of that required by the ~ existing PID landscaping code is strongly -- - encouraged for such commercial uses and will be evaluated as part of the final site plan review for such uses. of access currently lot with ORL95 20612.1 SMW <6', Drah Date 6/25196 .... '.. ... -.. ......-.. ..... .. .. .. n... ..... "," ..... . .'....,... '.-'.',' ft.'... ........1\'...,' 'iF......... .17..........'. . -... .. . - -.. . .. ...... '.':' ..... '.' "".' . - ~. .-, ,. ,0.... ...........,,'.. ,. ba!:~~tiJI7~t.~~;::!lj ORDINANCE NO 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A DETERMINATION THAT CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENS IVE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT APPROVED IN ORDINANCE NO 84- 51, AND AMENDED IN ORDINANCES NOS. 86-11, 86- 37, 88-3, 94-10 AND 94-51, DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION UNDER CHAPTER 380 06, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1996, DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW IS NECESSARY REGARDING SUCH CHANGES, APPROVING SUCH CHANGES, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ORDINANCE NOS 84-51, 86-11, 86-37, 88-3, 94-10 AND 94-51) FOR PURPOSES OF INCORPORATING THE APPROVED CHANGES, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES WHEREAS, Quantum Associates, a Florida general partnership ("Developer") is the current owner and developer of the remaining vacant land within the project commonly known as Quantum Corporate Park at Boynton Beach Development of Regional Impact (sometimes hereinafter called the "Quantum Park DRI"); and WHEREAS, the original Development Order for the Quantum Park DRI was approved by the City of Boynton Beach (the "City") by Ordinance No 84-51 and amended by Ordinance Nos 86-11, 86-37, 88- 3, 94-10 and 94-51 (hereinafter collectively called the "Development Order"); and WHEREAS, the land subject to the Development Order is described therein as the "Property" and is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, Developer has submitted to the City a Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional EXHIBIT "0" Impact ("NOPC") requesting a further amendment to the Development Order for the purpose of revising the Master Site Development Plan to reflect the addition of Lots 80, 81 and 82 to the DRI and to include commercial use as a permitted land use for certain additional lots within Quantum Park; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of Boynton Beach, as the governing body having jurisdiction, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for amendments to development orders approving developments of regional impact pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes (1996); and WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered the testimony, reports and other documentary evidence submitted at said public hearing by Developer, the City staff and the public, and the City Planning and Zoning Board's recommendations of the ____ day of , 1996; and WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered all of the foregoing NOW THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Commission of Boynton Beach, that said City Commission makes the following findings of fact: Section 1 A notice of public hearing in the proceedings was duly published on the day of , 1996, in The Post, a newspaper of general circulation in Boynton Beach, Florida, pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes, and proof of said publication has been duly filed in these proceedings. -2- Section 2. Developer has requested that the Development Order be amended to include the following provisions: 1. Lots 80, 81 and 82 as per the plat of P.C.D. Center, Plat Book 60, Pages 106 and 107, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, are hereby added and incorporated into the Quantum Park DRI. 2. Master Plan Amendment No 6 to the Master Site Development Plan for Quantum Park dated June II, 1996, is hereby approved 3. In accordance with the analysis of the intersection of Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard prepared by Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. dated April 9, 1996, as modified by Supplemental Analysis dated June 10, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference, the following intersection improvements shall be constructed at such time as that portion of the project served by Park Ridge Road exceeds the following trip generation levels: a 1,200 p m peak hour trips restripe the southbound approach for dual lefts and a combination through/right turn lane. b. 1,300 p.m. peak hour trips construct an additional right-turn lane on the northbound approach to provide dual right-turns c 1,935 p.m peak hour trips - add a southbound through lane and separate out the through/right into a through and right-turn only lane -3- The Developer shall not proceed with development of that portion of the project served by Park Ridge Boulevard which would generate in excess of 2,300 p.m. peak hour trips without further review of the operating characteristics of said intersection and approval by the City Section 3 Upon consideration of all matters described in Section 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996), it is hereby determined that: A. The amendments proposed by Developer do not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to this area B The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the local comprehensive "plan and local land development regulations. C. The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council on file in these proceedings D. The amendments proposed by Developer consti tute a substantial deviation under Chapter Florida Statutes (1996). Section 4 The City Commission has concluded as a matter of law that these proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes (1996), that Developer is entitled to the relief prayed and applied for, and do not 380.06, -4- that the Development Order is hereby amended incorporating the amendments proposed by Developer as set forth in Section 2 above. Section 5 Except as otherwise amended herein, the Development Order shall remain in full force and effect. FIRST READING this day of , 1996. SECOND READING and FINAL PASSAGE this day of , 1996. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAYOR VICE-MAYOR COMMISSION MEMBER COMMISSION MEMBER COMMISSION MEMBER ATTEST: CITY CLERK EXHIBITS: "A" - Amended Master Site Development Plan ORL9S 20376.1 SMW -5- 88 THE PALM BEACH POST MONDAY, JUNE 17, 1996 LEGAL NOTICES 110. ...4 LeGAL NOTIC! a_nlum P.rk NOTICI 0' PUIUC HlWllNO NOTlCIII H...." OlV,N ilia. CI" Commlnlon of TH' CITY 0' 10YNTON IIACH, fLORI- DA, .11 conducl . Pubic Mo.r, In. .1 ?,OO P.... or .. ooon IlIar,,".r .. Il1o .gend. pot. BIll. on T....d.I/., ..... I, 1.... III .... CI.. Mon celllml....n Clt....,,, 100 .... lo,n'" 1...11 ..f..reI"'........ '.:1 'lor, T f.'!! ,t It '" ..n lI.ren.'r." ....tI .h..... .. Il1o lo.n'.n ....11 Pork 0' C.m_,.. D.v.lOP- i ....n. Ord.r (Orelln.nc. No. ... ") .. .m.nd.d b, Ordl- n.no.. N... '.,1. N.J7 .nd 18-3. 14.10 .nd ....11 1 .nd d.. I.rmln.llon .. 10 w".lher or I nol Ih. propo..d cluln". con. I .mul.. . .ub.l.nll.1 d..I.llon I '0 I'" .ppro..d d,..lopm.nl , .rder wlI" r....ol 10 II.. r.1- lowlnll dllcrlb.d properl, I.. c.l.d wllhln Ih. corpor.l. Hm- II. 01 ..,d CIt" purou.nl 10 Ih. r.qu"l 01 Ih. p.rll.. In Inl....1 .nd In compll.nc. wllh Ch.pl.. JIO. Florid. SI.I. ute.. REQUEST OUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH DR' Form.rl, Bo,nlon B..ch P.rk 01 Commorc. Comp..h.n.I.. D...lopm.nl 01 R'lIlon.1 Im- p.ct. LEGAL DE SCRIPT ON: A Tr.cl 01 I.nd I,nll p.rll." In Secllon. 18, 17 20 .nd 21, Town.hlp 45 Soulh. R.nll' 43 E..I, P.I", a..eh County. Florld_, .ald Treet being more p.rllculerl, d..crlb.d .. 101- "w" Comm.nclnll .1 Ih. Soulhwe.1 corn.r 01 .,Id Sec. Uon 17: Ihenc. Norlh 1'44'311" !III, .'onll Ih. W..I Hn. 01 ;.cllon 17. . dl.l.nc. 01 1318.10 1..110 . polnlln I". nl....cllon wllh ,,,. c.nlor. In8 or N.W. 22nd Avenu., .. .cord.d In O.R. Book 1738. '.g. 1886. 01 Ihe Public R.- ~Drd. 0' Palm B.ach County, 'Iorld.; Ih.nc. wllh . b.. ring " Norlh S9'04 '32" EIII, .Ionll Ih. c.nlerlna 01 N.W. !2nd lI.enu., . dl.l.nc. 01 '78.31 ,..110 Ih. Polnl 01 B.- Ilnnlng; Ih.nc. Norlh 1'44'39" e..I, . dl.lanc. 01 1247.08 1..1 10 Ih. Soulh IlIhl 01 way IIn. 01 L.W.D,O. ..lor.1 21: IIlInc. Norlh Ig"OS' 49" E..I .Iong Ihe loulh rlghl 01 w.y L1n. W.D.D. Lat.raI21,.' record- ,d In O,R. Book 1732, P'II. : 12. 01 Ihe Public R.cord. 01 , 'alm Beech County Florida,. I 11,'.nc. 01 635.93 ,..110 Ih" .nlorln. 01 Ihe L.W,D,D. quaUzlng Canal E~4t .1 re.. . ord.d In O.R. Sook 1732;! .11' 1Il2, 01 Iha Public R.- ord. 01 p.lm B..ch Counl" lorld..; thence along the C.... nllne 0' .hl .bove d.'crlbed .4 C.n.I wllh . cur.e 10 lh. .1Ih1 h..ln9 . chord b..rlng I Norlh 10-32'52" EIII. . r.- lu. 01 150.00 ...1, . canlr.I ngla o' 4"04'17". .nd .n .rc 1n91h 01 63,29 ,..1: Ih.nc. onllnu. elonll Ih. c.n'orlln. . Ih. E.4 C.n'I, wllh . b..r- III 01 Norlh 12'35'00" EIII, . ..,.nce 01 320,811 1..1 10 . "IPI 01 cur..; Ih.nc. wllh . u,.. 10 Ih. I." h..lng . r.dl. ',' ~I 8500.00, . cenlr.1 enlll. , "S'30", .nd .n .rc '.nlllh ~~1I"'23 ,..,; Ih.nc. Norlh 111,,0" Ea.I. . dl.l.nc. 01 1..18 1..110 . polnl on lho h L1n. 01 S.cllon 17; )If.l,. wll" . b..rln" 01 Norlh ~,. ,,'3IH ...t, alono the I , 1..lIn. 01 S.cUon 17, . dl.. :~o' 01 IIIM.II0 1..1: Ih.nc. eulh 0'02'11" Eaol. . dl.. ,,,.. 01 2821,11 1111; Ih.nc. .r,h 8g'08' 411" h.l. . dl.. '"... 01 38S.118 I.el 10 . polnl ,Jlh. Norlh rlllhl 01 w., Hn. ('N.W 22nd A..nu. .. ..- I ord.d In a.R. Book 1738, ; .11' 18S8 01 Ihe Public R.- ord. 01 p.lm B..ch Counl" \orlds; thence South \I 27'31" EIII, . dl.l.nc. 01 0.00 I..t to the cent.rllne o' .W 22nd A.enu.: Ih.nc. IIh . cur.e 10 Ih. rlgl h,.lnll chord ba.rlnll 01 Norlh 5'2g'411" Ea.I, . r.dlu. o' 1137.02 1..,. . c.nlr.' .ngl. I 11"53'58" .nd.n orc I.nlllh I 282.S5 1..1 10 . polnl: IInc. norlh 12"02'41" h.l, dlal.nc. 01 1115.72 1111; IInc. Norlh 0'3"11" Ea.I. . "I.nc. 01 3gll.70 1..1: ,enc. Norlh S9'12'31" EIII, dl.lanc. 01 413.21 1..,; I.nc. Soulh 88'22'58" EIII, dl.l.nc. 01 1349.70 1..1 10 point on the W..t right o' .Y IIn. 01 Ih. Se.bo.rd o.sUln. Railroad: thine. oulli oJIJI'I1"-Eiil IlIIng II W..I rlthl 01 WI' In. 01 hi Ret"o"', , tll.lane. 01 , 101.01 f..t 10. polnl on .... Inl"ln. o' N. W, land A... UI Ih''''. N.,1It ....,.".. '101. 1I1o"r. .111 .."'ItME .. 'W, ,INI ""III..... ion.. I, ... ..11 Ih_. oulh .. '.... ..... " tII...o.. 01 1011... 1..11 I".n.. loulh ,'"..".. e..I. . dl.l.n08 01 ' 1lI.1t '.01 10 . polnl on Ih. I '..1 rlllhl 01 w., 01 Ih. .... oerd Co""ln. ".Ilro.d: ..nee wllh . b..rlnll 01 Soulh 4"08'23" Will, .Ionll Ih. '..I rlghl 01 w., 01 Ih. r.11- I.d, . dl.lance 01 1312.411 III: Ih.nce Soulh 0'33'53" ..1. . dl.l.nc. 01 28.89 1..1; I IInce Soull> 13"15'22" Will. dl.l.nc. 01 1120.57 1111: .enee North 88"50'04" We.l, dlatance 0' 187.60 f..ti line. wllh . be.rlnll Norlh '49'21" Will, . dl.l.nce 01 00.00 1..1: Ih.nce Norlh 8050'04" W..I, . dl.'.nc. 01 18.00 1..1: Ihenc. Soulh '49'21" Enl, . dl.l.nc. 01 56.84 ,..1: Ihanca Norlh 8"50'04" Will. . dlel.nc. 01 S 17.26 1..1 10 e polnl on Ih. enterlln. 01 the above de-- crlbed centerline 0' the E.4 anal; thence with . bearing I Norlh 5'18'14" Will. . die. Ince 01 153.13 leel, Ih.nc. 'lIh . cur.a 10 Ih. rlghl h..- 19 .. r.dlu. 01 450.00 1..1. . .nlrol .n9la 01 15"36'44", nd .n .rc I.nglh 01 122.82 ..I: Ih.nc. Norlh 10'18'30" I .." . dl.l.nc. 01 1188.80 .., 10 . point 0' curvej ,.nc. with. curve to the len ..Inll . "diu. 01 450.00 1..1 cenlral .ngl. 01 18"20'00". nd .n .rc I.nlllh 01 143.09 ..t: thence with. b..rlng of lorlh 8'01'30" Wltl, . dl.- .nc. 01 1255.14 1..1 10 . olnl on Ih. c.nlorlln. 01 N.W. 2nd Avef1uej thence wllh . .orlng 01 Soulh 89"04'32" fill, .Iong Ih. canlorlln. 01 I.W 22nd lI.anu. . dl.I.nc. ,I 817 ,85 I.el mora or I... 10 h. Polnl 01 B'9Innln9. :onl.lnlng 5111.55 .c... mo.. .r I... 10 Ih. Polnl 01 Be9ln- Ing. :onl8lnlo9 591.55 acr.. more -, I... Brtd lublect to ..... ,antA and right. of way of re- ord. I ,91.55 AC GROSS LIIND AREA IF QUANTUM PIIRK 1.10 AC LESS ROADWAY I :ANAL RIGHTS.OF.WAY OF IECORD i39.85 AC NET LAND AREA IF OUANTUM PARK 09.lh.. wllh Ih. .ddlllon 01-' ,It I.nd (101. 80, 81 .nd 82) ,Ing within Ih. pl.1 01 Ih. \' '.C.O. Center containing 13.17 acr.,. IS recorded In ; 'leI Book 80. P.II" 106 .nd : 107 01 Ih. Public R.cord. 01 '.Im Bllch Counl" Florid.. or . 10101 propo..d n'l land .... 01 553.02 .cr... 'ROPOSED CHANGES: 1) In. :orpor.llon 01 Ih. unda.a~ )p.d P .C.D.. C.nlor prop.rl, .101. 80. 81 .nd B21. conl.ln- n9 13.11 ecrn. .1 Ih. ,olllh- ..., co.ner of Park Rid'll. Bou- avard _nd Galeway Boul.ve,d Ind a change 10 the ma.ter llan de.lgnatlan 'rom o.nce ,.. to Indu.trlel/eommerclal ....; 21 Chenll' In Ih. m..ler pl.n , d"'gn.llon ql '01. 58. 59, 80 ."d e 1 'rom commercl.1 u.. 10 Indu.trl.I"....rch .nd d.- v.loDment/offlce U'.i 3) Ch.nll' In Ih. m..lor pl.n d..lgn.llon 01 101. 85A. 85B. 88. 8711. 87B, 87C .nd 91 from oltlcel holel Ule to oW- ce . hole" commercial u.e: 4) Ch.ng. In Ih. m..ler pl.n dewlgnatlon o. lot. 83. 84, .nd 85 trom oUlce u.e. to ottlc.. Icommerclal u..: 5) Ch.ng. In Ih. mlllor pl.n d..lgn.llon 01 101. 8eA .nd 688 'rom r..earch and devel- opment to r....rch Bnd d.ve- lopment/com,nerc..' u..: and 8) Change In the "'a.ter plan d..llln.llol1 .,101. 81, 70 72 71. 71. 77, 78. 711. u. '7:1'\ ond U' IrDm 10ll..elrl.1 10 In- du.trl.lIco",merol.'ulI. APPLICANT, Ou.nlum A.... cl.I.. AOENTl ".m.. G. Wln"d, ... qulr. Shull. a low.n AI Inl....I... p.rlle. .r. nolI- lied 10 .ppe.. .1 ..Id h..rlnl In p.r.on or b, .1I0rn., .nd b. h.ard. An, peroon who d.. cld.. I. .pp..1 .n, d.cl.lon 01 lho CII, Comml"'on wlllt r..pecl 10 .n, m.ller con.ld- .red .t till. m..\lnll will n..d . r.cord 01 Ih. prOClldln". .nd lor .uch prupo.. m., ".ed 10 en.ur. Ih.1 . ...b.lI", ..cord 01 Ihe proc..dlnll' I. m.d., which ..cord Includ.. lho I..Umon, .nd ..Idenc. upon which th. .pp..II. 10 ba b...d. CITY OF 1I0YNTON IlEACH SUZANNe Y. KRuse CYC/ AAE . CITY CLERK (407) 378,8081 PUB: Th. P.lm lI..ch PO'I Jun. 17. ll1N ..... , - MEETING MINUTES PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 11,1996 Chairman Dube advised Ms Heyden that the parking lot on the corner of Seacrest Boulevard and SE 23rd has never been sodded Mr Aguila advised that a very small portion was sodded and is now dead on SE 23rd Handicap spaces were provided in that lot, but there IS no way to get from hard surface to hard surface without going through the dead grass Ms Heyden advised that she would follow up on thIs situation 6, OLD BUSINESS None 7 NEW BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARING Land Use Element Amendment/Rezonina 1 Project Name Agent' Owner' Location Description Quantum Park PID/PCD Center James G Willard, Esquire Quantum Associates 13 93 acres of property at the southwest corner of 1-95 and Gateway Boulevard Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map from Office Commercial to Industrial and rezone from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Industrial Development (PID) to add into the Quantum Park PID Mike Rumpf, Senior Planner, made a brief presentation Law stipulates that property adjacent to a DRI, owned by the same entity operating the DRI, must be incorporated as part of the DRI This particular circumstance was noted during the last amendment to the DRI This is the first step in amending the master plan and the Future Land Use Map and rezoning the property The use approval will be reviewed tonight, and the master plan will be reviewed at the next meeting Jim Willard. Attornev for Quantum Associates. advised that the applicant has no comments to add to staff's recommendation These three particular lots were left out of the original DRI approval The lots are platted and enjoy the same infrastructure as the remainder of the DRI This would change the zoning to be consistent with the zoning in the rest of Quantum Park, and would make these lots consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Within two weeks, these lots will be added to the DRI as part of a Notification of Change to the DRI 3 MEETING MINUTeS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 11,1996 In response to Chairman Dube's question, Mr Willard advised that the applicant has no objections to the two conditions of approval noted in Exhibit "0" CHAIRMAN DUBE ANNOUNCED THE PUBLIC HEARING THERE WAS NO ONE PRESENT WHO WISHED TO SPEAK ON THIS PETITION Motion Mr Wische moved to approve the request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map from Office Commercial to Industrial and rezone from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Industrial Development (PID) to add into the Quantum Park PID, subject to staff comments Mr Aguila seconded the motion Mr Aguila questioned how this change would affect the COD Mr Willard advised that the legal description of the land that was put into the COD were the platted lots that were customarily known as Quantum, and marketed as such These three lots were included Therefore, nothing will change because they were already part of that legal description The motion carried unanimously Use ADDroval Description Quantum Park PIO James Willard Quantum Associates West side of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road Request to amend the list of permitted uses for the Quantum Corporate Park PID to allow used car sales on industrially-designated lots within the PID 2 Project Agent Owner' Location At the boardrs request, no presentation was made by staff Mr Aguila confInned with Ms, Heyden that the purpose of this request is to allow the use in Quantum Park, and not to approve the site plan However, Ms, Heyden explained that site conditions have been added because she feels that waiting until the site plan stage would be too late Mr Aguila was of the opinion that any auto dealership in the City of Boynton Beach should be a conditional use because each one needs to be evaluated on its own merit, and so that conditions can be added for aesthetics, beautification and buffering from neighbors, In looking at the site plan that was included as part of the back-up material, Mr Aguila felt that he was looking at a "sea of asphalt" Even reviewing the brochure which was included 4 ORDINANCE NO 96-J,g 1UUl AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNT N BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR DETERMINATION THAT CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT APPROVED IN ORDINANCE NO 84-51, AND AMENDED IN ORDINANCES NOS 86-11, 86- 3 7 , 88- 3 , 9 4 - 10 AND 94 - 5 1 , DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION UNDER CHAPTER 380 06, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1996, DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW IS NECESSARY REGARDING SUCH CHANGES, APPROVING SUCH CHANGES, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ORDINANCE NOS 84-51, 86-11, 86-37, 88- 3, 94-10 AND 94-51) FOR PURPOSES OF INCORPORATING THE APPROVED CHANGES, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Ill' 2 4 vl"\ -~----' PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. WHEREAS, Riteco Development Corporation, a Florida corporation ("Riteco") filed with the City of Boynton Beach (the "City") an Application for Development Approval of Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact (the "ADA") on May 21, 1984, regarding that certain property (the "Property") described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the ADA was approved and the Development Order for the Property was granted December 18, 1984 and pursuant to Ordinance No 84-51 (the "Development Order"); and WHEREAS, Riteco subsequently conveyed its right, titles and interest in and to the Property to Boynton Park of Commerce, Inc , a Florida corporation ("Boynton Park"), and, Boynton Park, in turn, subsequently conveyed its right, title and interest in and to the Property to Quantum Associates, a Florida general partnership (the "Developer") and WHEREAS, Developer filed with the City respective which applications amend the Development Order, to applications were approved by the City in Ordinance No 86-11, Ordinance No 86-37, Ordinance No 88-3, Ordinance No 94-10, and Ordinance 94-51; and WHEREAS, the term "Development Order" includes all amendments thereto and WHEREAS, Associates, Florida Quantum a general partnership ("Developer") is the current owner and develope1o of the remaining vacant land within the project commonly knovJn as Quantum Corporate Park at Boynton Beach Development of Regional Impact (sometimes hereinafter called the "Quantum i Park DRI"), and WHEREAS, Developer has submitted to the City a Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("NOPC") requesting a further amendment to the Development Order for the purpose of revising the Master Site Development Plan to reflect the addition of Lots 80, 81 and 82 to the DRI and to include commercial use as a permitted land use for certain additional lots (lots 65A, 65B, 67B, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 91) within Quantum Park and delete commercial use as a permitted land use for lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62 within Quantum Park (see attached Exhibit "B" - Amended Master Site Development Plan); and WHEREAS, the City Commission of Boynton Beach, as the governing body having jurisdiction, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for amendments to development orders approving developments of regional impact pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996); and WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered the testimony, reports and other documentary evidence submitted at said public hearing by Developer, the City staff and the public, and the City Planning and Development Boardrs recommendations of the 25th day of June, 1996; and WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered all of the foregoing NOW THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Commission of Boynton Beach, that said City Commission makes the following findings of fact Section 1 A notice of public hearing in the proceedings was duly published on the 17th day of June, 1996, in The Post, a newspaper of general circulation in Boynton Beach, Florida, pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes, and proof of said publication has been duly filed in these proceedings -2- i 'i : I I, I Section 2 Developer has requested that the Development Order be amended to include the following provisions 1 Lots 80, 81 and 82 as per the plat of P C D Center, Plat Book 60, Pages 106 and 107, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, are hereby added and incorporated into the Quantum Park DRI 2 Master Plan Amendment No 6 to the Master Site Development Plan for Quantum Park dated July 1, 1996, is hereby approved 3 In accordance with the analysis of the intersection of Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc dated April 9, 1996, as modified by supplemental Analysis dated June 10, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference, the following intersection improvements shall be constructed at such time as that portion of the project served by Park Ridge Road exceeds the following trip generation levels a 1,200 P m peak hour trips - restripe the southbound approach for dual lefts and a combination through/right turn lane b 1,300 P m peak hour trips - construct an additional right-turn lane on the northbound approach to provide dual right-turns c 1,935 P m peak hour trips - add a southbound through lane and out the separate through/right into a through and right-turn only lane The Developer shall not proceed with development of that portion of the project served by Park Ridge Boulevard which would generate in excess of 2,300 p m peak hour trips without further review of the operating characteristics of said intersection and approval by the City, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the Department of Community Affairs -3- '. !I , , 4 Concurrently with the submittal of a site plan application for any lot designated commercial pursuant to the Master Site Development Plan (regardless of whether the proposed use is commercial or another permitted land use), the applicant shall indicate in writing to the City the number of PM peak hour vehicle trips estimated to be generated by the proposed building improvement and also the aggregate peak hour trip generation for all lots served by Park Ridge Boulevard 5 Wi th respect to any commercial development along Gateway Boulevard, the following conditions shall apply a There shall be no increase in the number of free- standing signs than is currently permitted (i e one per loti additional lots created beyond the number of lots that currently exists as of the adoption date of this ordinance shall not be entitled to their own freestanding sign and share must freestanding signage with an adjacent lot) b There shall be no increase in the number of access points on to Gateway Boulevard than currently anticipated (i e addi tional lots created beyond the number of lots that currently exists as of the adoption date of this ordinance shall not be entitled to their own access point and must share access through cross access with an adjacent lot) c Landscaping shall be installed in excess of that required by the landscaping code in effect as of the adoption date of this ordinance The extent of the supplemental landscaping required shall be determined at the time of sit~ plan review for the first commercial along Boulevard lot Gateway -4- submitted for review after the adoption date of this ordinance The supplemental landscaping determined to be required for this first commercial lot shall establish the landscaping standard required for subsequent commercial lots along Gateway Boulevard 6 Where square footage is used to evaluate traffic generated by a given land use, gross floor area shall be used, with the exception of commercial use which shall be evaluated using gross leasable area 7 The sewage lift station serving Park Ridge Boulevard shall be upgraded at Quantum's expense at such time as development generates sewer flow in excess of the lift station capacity as determined by the city's Utilities Department Section 3 Upon consideration of all matters described in Section 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996), it is hereby determined that A The amendments proposed by Developer do not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to this area B The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations C The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council on file in these proceedings D The amendments proposed by Developer do not constitute a substantial deviation under Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996) Section 4 The City Commission has concluded as a matter of law that these proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996), that Developer is entitled to the relief prayed and applied for, and that the Development Order is hereby amended -5- [i '; I , incorporating the amendments proposed by Developer as set forth in Section 2 above Section 5 Except as otherwise amended herein, the Development Order shall remain in full force and effect FIRST READING this 2nd day of July, 1996 SECOND READING and FINAL PASSAGE this /~ day of ~~~ , 1996 I ATTEST ~\~ COMMISSIONER ~ I~ '~ ~ Ii ~~ : CI CLERK I I (Corporate Seal) , EXHIBITS "A" - Legal Description "B" - Amended Master Site Development Plan -6- EXHIBIT "A" () tJb / 33 - - OVERALL BOUNDARY LEGAL DESCRIPTION A Tract of land lying partiall, in 'eetion. II, 17, 30 and 21, Township 41 SouCh, Ran,e 4' .a.t, 'al. aeach County, florida, laid Tract being .o~e particularlr delo~Sb.d .. '0110w.. Co...natn, .. ~h. 8outhwe.e Gorner of ..id .ection 11; thence North 1....39" last, along the "est line of Section 11, a distance 01 1311.10 feet to a point in the incerlection with the centerline 01 N,N, 22nd Avenue, a. recorded in O,R. Book 1138r Page 11.1, 01 tbe .ublic Recordl 01 'ala aeacb county, florid.; thence with a bearing of Nortb 89.0.'32" lalt, along the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue, a dietance of 118.31 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence North 1..4'39. laet, a diltance of 1241,06 feet to the South right of way line of L.W.D.D. Lateral 21; thence North 89008'49" last along the South right of way line L.W.D.D. Lateral 21, al recorded in O.R. Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public Records of pal81 Beach county, Florida, a distance of 635.93 feet to the centerline of the L W D 0 Equalizing Canal 1-4, as recorded in O.R. Book 1132, Pag~ 612, of the Public Records of pal81 seach county, Florida; thence along the centerline of the above described B-4 canal with a curve to the ri9ht havin9 a chord be.ring of North 10032'52" Baat, a radius of 750.00 feet, a central angle of 4004'17", and an arc length of 53.29 feet, thence continue along the centerline of the 1-. canal, w1th a bearing of North 12035'00" East, a di.tance of 320.69 feet to a point of curve; thence ~1th a curve to the left having a radius of 6500.00, a central angle of 3028 130", and an arc length of 39..23 feet; thence North 9006' 30" Bast, a distance of 1919.16 feet to a point on the tlorth Line of Section 11; thence with a bearing of North 89016'39" Bast, along the North line of Section 11, a distance of 1964.50 feet; thence South 0002' II" Bast, a distance 0 f 2625.18 f.et; thence North 890081.9" Bast, a distance of 368 96 .feet to a point on the North right of way line of N W 22nd Avenue .s recorded in O.R. Book 1738, .ave 1686 of the Public IRecord. of Pal. .each County, Florida, thence South 19027'31" ~ast, a diltance of 50 00 feet to the centerl1ne of N M 22nd Avenue, tbence "lith a curve to the right hav1nv a chord bearing of North 75.29' .9" Bait, a rad1us of 1631. 02 feet, a central angle of '.53'58", and an arc length of 282.85 feet to a point, thence north 12002'41" Bast, ~ d1stance of 915.72 feet; thence North 0031'11" East, a distance of 399.70 feet: thence North 89012'37" Bast, a distance of 413.21 feet;then South 88022'56" East, a d1stance of 1349 70 feet to a point on the West right of way 11ne of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad; thence south 0028'21" Bast, along the West right of way line of the Railroad, a distance of 1309.09 feet to a point on the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, thence North 88027'31" We.t, .10ng the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue a di.tance of 1572.'7 f.et, thence South 0033153" Bast, a distanc. of 1306.69 feet, thence South 88045'31" last, a diltance of 333.51 feet to a point on the West right of way of the s.aboard co..tline Railroad; tbence with a bear1ng of Soutb 14008'23" West, along the Weet r1ght of way of the railroad, a distance of 1312.4' feet, thence south 0033'53" East, a distance of 26.69 feet; thence South 13.15'22" West, . diltanc. of '20,11 feet, thence North e'-50'O'. We.t, a distance of 181.60 feet, thence with a bearing North 0049'21" West, a d18tp.nce of 200.00 feet; thence North 88.50'04" West, a distance of 218 00 feet; thence South 0049121" East, a distance of 200 00 feet; thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 40 00 feet; thence South 0049'21" Bast, a dis~ance of 556 84 feet; thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 3617.26 feet to a point on the centerline of the above described centerline of the E-4 Canal; thenc. with a bearing of North ~01"14" W.st, a distance of 153 13 feet, thence with a curve to th. r19ht having a radius of 450.00 feet, a central angle of 15036'4.", and an arc length --------------- II I. ILEGAL DESCRIPTION I Continued I I!of 122.62 .feet; thence North 10018'30" Ea.t, a di.tance of ,988.&0 f..-C to a point of curv., thence with. curve to the 1. IlhaVing a radiu. of.fIO.OO f.et, . cencral antl. of l'.20'O~ and an are length of 143." feet, thence with a b.aring of North 18001' 30" We.c, a distance of 1255.1t f..t to a point on the Ilcenterline of N.W. 22nd Avenu., thence with a bearing of South ;,89004' 32" We.t, alon9 the c.nt.rline of N.W. 22nd Avenue a Ildi.tance of 817.85 f..t .ore or 1e.. to thl Point of Beginning cont.ining 591.55 acr.. aore or 1e.. and .ubject to ......nts and right. of way of r.cord. \. EXHIBIT "B" " ! t,."".~ ~.....~_ , j .1 I I l ... &:J ii 17 .." r S G ~ 51 Q~ ~< W~ IlJO EE - I --, ~ , '! t l - ;-- j - .., , i ....;.. I I ii. ~-- .. ....: .1J \\ -r:. . ~ -.,'~. ...;=..~. ::_~=-- - :.- :1.. . ..,.. !.. ..... ... '''In' ...... L...... __ _ .... 'JII := WASTER "LAN ....ENOWENT NO. . JULY 11, 18. I IMI...... 01 ,,. ... ..... 1a . ~ AI roC ,. . 'nC ... ICMOII. ~ . ~ WIllI - _IODI' NO. . .. "/\l1M. I Dl'CUIPIIht fJII we I'CIWaMI UItG ~ ~ ..,.0 NIX DCIID .... ..... ........ ...... ..... CII"f' ~ ---~.. It LJI6.JN _n eRa...... ~..... . Q.UI) _H'- . " __ MIA. ... YO IIICID ... . '--'712 . " ClOD .... .. ..... _ . _ . " _ ... CIDMIIICIIL a. ..... CIID ... .. .. ......,. .... __ IS._ ... ~ ~~-=":::r=.='.=...-..a..... _. _. II APPROveD COMMERCfAt IIIllI DELETION OF COMMERCIA MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGEND ~--LJ 'I' '!' i (:) 0"_ 81.12 ...... orrICo/CommercIal 1.57 "'crn Ollie./Ha'./Commora.l 13.15 "cr.. Ollie'/Hal. 11.57 "cr., orrlCo/RfcD 1.03 "Ctn OIIlce/GId 2.31 .....n Indultrlol/Comm_ 21.55 ........ Indloltriol/RMl/OIllca 23.111 "'cr.. Indu,'r"l 115.35 "cr.. R&:D 32.11 "cr.. R&:O/CId 2.40 "crn Cavornmonlol/ln'"luUonol 311.110 "cr.. WotlOndl 1.00 "ern Sand Pine R.....w 40.00 Acr.. Raacla 41.13 ....... OPEN SP"CE ~ ICU7 "crn Perk. L..... Oettntlort I.'" , KEY PLAN QUANTUM ASSOCIATES Nollonal Clly Center 115 Wesl Washlnglon SI. Indlonapolls, IN 46204 (317) 636-1600 QUANTUM PARK Tor At ~53.1.3 Acr.. REQUEST FOR PUBLISHING LEGAL NOTICES AND/OR LEGAL ADVERTISEMENTS A completed copy of this routing slip must accompany any request to have a Legal Notice or Legal Advertisement published and must be submitted to the Office of the City Attorney eight (8) working days prior to the first publishing date requested below ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planninq and Zoninq Department PREPARED BY Tambri J, Hevden DATE PREPARED June 13, 1996 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NOTICE OR AD Ouantum Park notice of proposed chanqe to the DRI development order to add the PCD Center property and chanqe the master plan land use desiqnation of lots 58, 59, 60, 61, 65A, 65B, 66, 67A, 67B, 67C, 68A, 68B, 69, 70, 72, 73A, 73B, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 and 91, SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS (Size of Headline, Type Size, Section Placement, Black Border, etc ) Pursuant to Chapter 380,06 (19) (f) of Florida Statues, there appears to be no special requirements, SEND COPIES OF AD TO Planninq & Zoninq Dept, , Quantum Associates, Aqent, James G, Willard, Newspaper, City Attornev NEWSPAPER(S) TO PUBLISH The Post (newspaper of qeneral circulation). since this is a prolect of reqional im?act, rather than the Bovnton Beach News, DATE(S) TO BE PUBLISHED Minimum once, 15 days prior to public hearinq date of Julv 2, 1996, i,e, June 17, 1996, APPROVED BY (1) ~ f ~ 1 d tf-n-ll).-1,t. -t1 tU--.J / (Department Head) 6;;1/1[, (Date) (2) (City Attorney) (Date) (3) 6/aJe-- itjv/9(,; (City Manager) (Date) RECEIVED BY CITY CLERK COMPLETED a legalnot QUA Quantum Park - Notice of Public Hearing Page 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that City Commission of THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, will conduct a Public Hearing at 7 00 P M or as soon thereafter as the agenda permits on Tuesday, July 2, 1996, in the City Hall Commission Chambers, 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida The purpose of this public hearing is for consideration of a proposed change to the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Development Order (Ordinance No 84-51) as amended by Ordinances Nos 86-11, 86-37 and 88-3, 94-10 and 94-51 and determination as to whether or not the proposed change constitutes a substantial deviation to the approved development order with respect to the following described property located within the corporate limits of said City, pursuant to the request of the parties in interest and in compliance with Chapter 380, Florida Statutes REQUEST QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH DRI Formerly Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact LEGAL DESCRIPTION A Tract of land lying partially in Sections 16, 17, 20 and 21, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, said Tract being more particularly described as follows Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Section 17, thence North 1044'3911 East, along the West line of Section 17, a distance of 1318 10 feet to a point in the intersection with the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, as recorded in 0 R Book 1738, Page 1686, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, thence with a bearing of North 89004'3211 East, along the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, a distance of 778 37 feet to the Point of Beginning, thence North 1044'3911 East, a distance of 1247 06 feet to the South right of way line of L W D D Lateral 21, thence North 89008'4911 East along the South right of way line L W D D Lateral 21, as recorded in 0 R Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, a distance of 635 93 feet to the centerline of the L W D D Equalizing Canal E-4, as recorded in 0 R Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence along the centerline of the above described E-4 Canal with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of North 10032'5211 East, a radius of 750 00 feet, a central angle of 4004'1711, and an arc length of 53 29 feet, thence continue along the centerline of the E-4 Canal, with a bearing of North 12035'0011 East, a distance of 320 69 feet to a point of curve, thence with a curve to the left having a radius of 6500 00, a central angle of 3028'3011, and an arc length of 394 23 feet, thence North 9006'3011 East, a distance of 1979 16 feet to a point on the North Line of Section 17, thence with a bearing of North 89016'3911 East, along the North line of Section 17, a distance of 1964 50 feet, thence South 0002'1111 East, a distance of 2625 18 feet, thence North 89008'4911 East, a distance of 368 96 feet to a point on the North right of way line of N W 22nd Avenue as recorded in 0 R Book 1738, Page 1686 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, thence South 19027'3111 East, a distance of 50 00 feet to the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, thence with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of Quantum Park - Notice of Public Hearing Page 2 North 75029'49" East, a radius of 1637 02 feet, a central angle of 9053'58", and an arc length of 282 85 feet to a point; thence north 12002'41" East, a distance of 915 72 feet, thence North 0031'11" East, a distance of 399 70 feet; thence North 89012'37" East, a distance of 413 21 feet, thence South 88022'56" East, a distance of 1349 70 feet to a point on the West right of way line of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad, thence South 0028'21" East, along the West right of way line of the Railroad, a distance of 1309 09 feet to a point on the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, thence North 88027'31" West, along the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue a distance of 672 97 feet, thence South 0033'53" East, a distance of 1306 69 feet; thence South 88045'31" East, a distance of 333 51 feet to a point on the West right of way of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad, thence with a bearing of South 14008'23" West, along the West right of way of the railroad, a distance of 1312 49 feet, thence South 0033'53" East, a distance of 26 69 feet, thence South 13015'22" West, a distance of 920 57 feet, thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 187 60 feet, thence with a bearing North 0049'21" West, a distance of 200 00 feet, thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 218 00 feet; thence South 0049'21" East, a distance of 200 00 feet, thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 40 00 feet, thence South 0049'21" East, a distance of 556 84 feet, thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 3617 26 feet to a point on the centerline of the above described centerline of the E-4 Canal; thence with a bearing of North 5018'14" West, a distance of 153 13 feet, thence with a curve to the right having a radius of 450 00 feet, a central angle of 15036'44", and an arc length of 122 62 feet, thence North 10018'30" East, a distance of 988 60 feet to a point of curve; thence with a curve to the left having a radius of 450 00 feet, a central angle of 18020'00", and an arc length of 143 99 feet, thence with a bearing of North 8001'30" West, a distance of 1255 14 feet to a point on the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, thence with a bearing of South 89004'32" West, along the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue a distance of 817 85 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning Containing 591 55 acres more or less and subject to easements and rights of way of record 591 55 AC 51 70 AC GROSS LAND AREA OF QUANTUM PARK LESS ROADWAY & CANAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD NET LAND AREA OF QUANTUM PARK 539 85 AC Together with the addition of all land (lots 80, 81 and 82) lying within the plat of the P C D Center, containing 13 17 acres, as recorded in Plat Book 60, Pages 106 and 107, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, for a total proposed net land area of 553 02 acres PROPOSED CHANGES 1 ) Incorporation of the undeveloped P C D Center property (lots 80, 81 and 82), containing 13 17 acres at the southeast corner of Park Ridge Boulevard and Gateway Quantum Park - Notice of Public Hearing Page 3 Boulevard and a change to the master plan designation from office use to industrial/commercial use, 2) Change in the master plan designation of lots 58, 59, 60 and 61 from commercial use to industrial/research and development/office use, 3) Change in the master plan designation of lots 65A, 65B, 66, 67A, 67B, 67C and 91 from office/hotel use to office/hotel/commercial use, 4) Change ln the master plan designation of lots 83, 84 and 85 from office use to office/commerical use, 5) Change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 68B from research and development to research and development/commercial use, and 6) Change in the master plan designation of lots 69, 70, 72, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73A and 73B from industrial to industrial/commercial use APPLICANT Quantum Associates AGENT: James G Willard, Esquire Shutts & Bowen All interested parties are notified to appear at said hearing in person or by attorney and be heard Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH SUZANNE M KRUSE, CMC/AAE CITY CLERK (407) 375-6062 a legalnot QUA MEETING MINU ; PLANNING It DEVELOPMENT BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA AUGUST 13, 1996 Motion Vice Chairman Golden moved to approve the request to abandon the eastern portion of the cul-de- sac located at the northern terminus of Kepner Drive (a.k.a. S E. 7th Street) subject to staff comments. Mr Aguila seconded the motion which carried unanimously 8. COMMENTS BY MEMBERS Vice Chairman Golden advised that the DCA has decided to appeal the City's decision on Quantum Park. At Chairman Dube's request, Ms. Heyden advised that this subject deals with the DRI amendment that came before the board approximately two months ago for adding additional commercial lots at Quantum Park and relocating the parcels already designated for commercial The City Commission decided that they did not want the flexibility of commercial and required the applicant to designate the number of commercial acres The applicant turned in a master plan showing that and included a note that precluded Treasure Coast and the DCA from ever looking at the master modification again Their note was not worded correctly DCA has 45 days after we adopt a Development Order to appeal They want the note removed from the plan. Therefore, they are appealing. Ms. Heyden has not had an opportuni,ty-to talk with Quantum Park representatives about removing the note She is hopeful they will remove the note and that will end the issue. 9, ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the board, the meeting properly adjourned at 8 14 p.m f}:;:; ~i!~ Recording Secretary (Two Tapes) AuguS114. 1996 10