LEGAL APPROVAL
%e City of
tJ3oynton ~eacli
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Bead/. 'Boulevard
P.D 'Bo{.310
'Boynton 'Bead/., :Jlorida 33425-0310
City:Jfa[[. (407) 375-6000
:JJU. (407) 375-6090
CERTIFICATION
I, Suzanne M. Kruse, City Clerk of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, do hereby certify
that attached Ordinance #096-33, consisting of six (6) pages, Exhibit "A" two (2) pages,
and Exhibit "B" one (1) page is a true and correct copy as it appears in the records of the
City of Boynton Beach, Florida.
WITNESS, my hand and the corporate seal of the CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, this 26th of July, 1996.
~~~~
Suz nne M. Kruse, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
July 26,1996
s: \cc: \ wp \cerlifyj
51mema s (jateway to tfu (julfstream
ORDINANCE NO 96-~~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A
DETERMINATION THAT CHANGES TO THE
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL
IMPACT APPROVED IN ORDINANCE NO 84-51,
AND AMENDED IN ORDINANCES NOS 86-11, 86-
37, 88-3, 94-10 AND 94-51, DO NOT
CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION UNDER
CHAPTER 380 06, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1996,
DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW IS NECESSARY
REGARDING SUCH CHANGES, APPROVING SUCH
CHANGES, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER
(ORDINANCE NOS 84-51, 86-11, 86-37, 88-
3, 94-10 AND 94-51) FOR PURPOSES OF
INCORPORATING THE APPROVED CHANGES, AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, Riteco Development Corporation, a Florida
corporation ("Riteco") filed with the City of Boynton Beach
(the "City") an Application for Development Approval of
Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact (the "ADA") on
May 21, 1984, regarding that certain property (the "Property")
described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part
hereof; and
WHEREAS, the ADA was approved and the Development Order
for the Property was granted December 18, 1984 and pursuant to
Ordinance No 84-51 (the "Development Order"); and
WHEREAS, Riteco subsequently conveyed its right, titles
and interest in and to the Property to Boynton Park of
Commerce, Inc , a Florida corporation ("Boynton Park"), and,
Boynton Park, in turn, subsequently conveyed its right, title
and interest in and to the Property to Quantum Associates, a
Florida general partnership (the "Developer") and
WHEREAS, Developer filed with the City respective
applications
to
amend
the
Development
Order,
which
applications were approved by the City in Ordinance No 86-11,
Ordinance No 86-37, Ordinance No 88-3, Ordinance No 94-10,
and Ordinance 94-51; and
WHEREAS, the term "Development Order" includes all
amendments thereto and
WHEREAS,
Quantum
Associates,
a
Florida
general
partnership ("Developer") is the current owner and developer
of the remaining vacant land within the project commonly known
as Quantum Corporate Park at Boynton Beach Development of
Regional Impact (sometimes hereinafter called the "Quantum
Park DRI"); and
WHEREAS, Developer has submitted to the City a
Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved
Development of Regional Impact ("NOPC") requesting a further
amendment to the Development Order for the purpose of revising
the Master Site Development Plan to reflect the addition of
Lots 80, 81 and 82 to the DRI and to include commercial use as
a permitted land use for certain additional lots (lots 65A,
65B, 67B, 76,77,78,79 and 91) within Quantum Park and
delete commercial use as a permitted land use for lots 58, 59,
60, 61 and 62 within Quantum Park (see attached Exhibit "B" -
Amended Master Site Development Plan); and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of Boynton Beach, as the
governing body having jurisdiction, is authorized and
empowered to consider applications for amendments to
development orders approving developments of regional impact
pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996); and
WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered the
testimony, reports and other documentary evidence submitted at
said public hearing by Developer, the City staff and the
public, and the City Planning and Development Board's
recommendations of the 25th day of June, 1996; and
WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered all of the
foregoing
NOW THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Commission of
Boynton Beach, that said City Commission makes the following
findings of fact
Section 1 A notice of public hearing in the proceedings
was duly published on the 17th day of June, 1996, in The Post,
a newspaper of general circulation in Boynton Beach, Florida,
pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes, and proof of
said pUblication has been duly filed in these proceedings
-2-
I
I'
II
/
I
Section 2
Developer has requested that the Development
!i
I,
i
I Order be amended to include the following provisions
1 Lots 80, 81 and 82 as per the plat of P C 0
Center, Plat Book 60, Pages 106 and 107, Public
Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, are hereby
added and incorporated into the Quantum Park DRI
2
Master Plan Amendment No
6 to the Master Site
Development Plan for Quantum Park dated July 1,
1996, is hereby approved
3 In accordance with the analysis of the intersection
of Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard prepared
by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc dated April 9,
1996, as modified by Supplemental Analysis dated
June 10, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference,
the following intersection improvements shall be
constructed at such time as that portion of the
project served by Park Ridge Road exceeds the
following trip generation levels
a
1,200 P m peak hour trips
restripe the
southbound approach for dual lefts and a
i
I
II
!
i
I
combination through/right turn lane
b
1,300 P m peak hour trips
construct an
additional right-turn lane on the northbound
approach to provide dual right-turns
c 1,935 p m peak hour trips - add a southbound
through
lane
and
separate
out
the
through/right into a through and right-turn
only lane
The Developer shall not proceed with development of
that portion of the project served by Park Ridge
Boulevard which would generate in excess of 2,300
p m peak hour trips without further review of the
operating characteristics of saiQ intersection and
approval by the City, the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council and the Department of Community
Affairs
-3-
,:
I
i
I
I
i
I
!
4 Concurrently with the submittal of a site plan
application for any lot designated commercial
pursuant to the Master Site Development Plan
(regardless of whether the proposed use is
commercial or another permitted land use), the
applicant shall indicate in writing to the City the
number of PM peak hour vehicle trips estimated to
be generated by the proposed building improvement
and also the aggregate peak hour trip generation
for all lots served by Park Ridge Boulevard
5 Wi th respect to any commercial development along
Gateway Boulevard, the following conditions shall
apply
a There shall be no increase in the number of
free-
standing signs than is
currently
permitted (i e one per lot; additional lots
created beyond the number of lots that
currently exists as of the adoption date of
this ordinance shall not be entitled to their
own
freestanding
sign
and
must
share
freestanding signage with an adjacent lot)
b There shall be no increase in the number of
access points on to Gateway Boulevard than
currently anticipated (i e
addi tional lots
created beyond the number of lots that
currently exists as of the adoption date of
this ordinance shall not be entitled to their
own access point and must share access through
cross access with an adjacent lot)
c
Landscaping shall be installed in excess of
that required by the landscaping code in
effect as of the adoption date of this
ordinance
The extent of the supplemental
landscaping required shall be determined at
the time of site plan review for the first
commercial
lot
along
Boulevard
Gateway
-4-
'I
I
ji
submitted for review after the adoption date
of
ordinance
The
supplemental
this
landscaping determined to be required for this
first commercial lot shall establish the
landscaping standard required for subsequent
commercial lots along Gateway Boulevard
6 Where square footage is used to evaluate traffic
generated by a given land use, gross floor area
shall be used, with the exception of commercial use
which shall be evaluated using gross leasable area
7 The sewage lift station serving Park Ridge
Boulevard shall be upgraded at Quantum's expense at
such time as development generates sewer flow in
excess of the lift station capacity as determined
by the city's Utilities Department
Section 3
Upon consideration of all matters described
in Section 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996) , it is hereby
determined that
!
do
not
amendments
proposed
by
Developer
A
The
I
I
II
I
'I
I
,I
1\
unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the
objectives of the adopted state land development plan
applicable to this area
B The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent
with the local comprehensive plan and local land
development regulations
C The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent
with the recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council on file in these proceedings
D The amendments proposed by Developer do not
conBtitute a substantial deviation under Chapter 380.06,
Florida Statutes (1996)
Section 4
The City Commission has concluded as a matter
of law that these proceedings have be~n duly conducted
pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380 06, Florida StatuteB
(1996), that Developer is entitled to the relief prayed and
applied for, and that the Development Order is hereby amended
-5-
Ii
'I
I
!
I
incorporating the amendments proposed by Developer as set
I
II
I forth in Section 2 above
I
Section 5
Except as otherwise amended herein, the
I Development Order shall remain in full force and effect
FIRST READING this 2nd day of July, 1996
SECOND READING and FINAL PASSAGE this
/tb
day of
J';~~
, 1996
CITY
4
MISSIONER
~~~/
COMMISSIONER ~ J
~!~
CO~SIONER
I ATTEST
/
/
;;~/~~~
, CI~ CLERK
i
i
(Corporate Seal)
'i
:,
,I EXHIBITS
"A"
"B"
- Legal Description
- Amended Master Site Development Plan
I
I
!:
i
i
I
I'
I
-6-
EXHIBIT "A"
(J 16 / 3 3
-
-
OVBRALL BOUNDARY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A Tract of land lyln9 partially in 'ection. ,., 11, ~o and al,
Town.hip 41 eouth, ~.nve .3 .a.t, Pal. Beacb County, florida,
said Tract beina .ore particularlr de.G~ibed .. lo11oW8'
Co...nain, .. the 80uehwe.e Gorner of .aid Sectton 17; thence
North 10..... 39" lalt, alona tbe Weet libe of aection 11, a
dt.tanc. at 1311.10 feet to . point tn the inter..ction with the
centerline o! N.W. Z2nd Avenue, .. recorded in O.R. Book 1138,
Pave 1188, o! the publio Records o! Pal. aeach County, florida;
thence with a bearlnCjl of North 89004' 32 II Bait, along the
centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue, a dietance of 118.31 feet to the
Point of Bevinninq; thence North 10"4'39" last, a distance of
1241.06 feet to the South right of way line of L.W.D.D. Lateral
21; thence North 89008'49" Bast along the South right of way
11ne L.W.D.D. Lateral 21, as recorded in a.R. Book 1732, Page
612, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, a
distance of 63S 93 feet to the centerline of the L W. D 0
Equalizing Canal B-4, as recorded in 0 R Book 1132, Page 612,
of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence
along the centerline of the above described 8-4 Canal with a
curve to the right having a chord bearing of Horth 10032'52"
East, a radius of 150 00 feet, a central angle of 4004'17", and
an arc length of 53.29 feet, thence continue along the
centerline of the 1-4 Canal, with a bearing of Harth 12035100"
East, a dietance of 320.69 feet to a point of curve; thence ~lth
a curve to the left having a radius of 6500.00, a central angle
of 302e' 30", and an arc length of 394.23 feet; thence North
9006' 30" Bast, a distance of 1919.16 feet to a point on th~
lIorth Line of Section 1,; thence with a bearing of North
89016'39" last, along the North line of section 11, a distance
of 1964.50 feet; thence South 0002 '11" Bast, a distance at
2625.1S feet; thence North 8900S'49" Baet, a distance of 368 96
feet to a point on the Morth right of way line of N W 22nd
Avenue ae recorded in a.R. Book 1138, .av- 1686 of the Public
,Record. of Pal. Beach County, rloridaf thence South 19027131"
~ast, a distance of 50 00 feet to the centerline of N W 22nd
Avenu.; thence Wlith a curve to the right havinv a chord bearing
of North 150Z9',9" Bast, a radius of 163/.02 feet, a central
angle of 9053'58", and an arc length of 282.85 feet to a point,
thence north 12002'41" Bast, ~ distance of 915 12 feet; thence
North 0031' 11" East, a distance of 399.70 feet; thence North
89012'31" last, a distance of 413.21 f..t;then South 88022156"
East, a distance of 1349.10 feet to a point on the West right of
way line of the Seaboard coastline Railroad; thence South
0028121" Bast, along the West right of way line of the Railroad,
a distance of 1309.09 feet to a point on the centerline of N W
22nd Avenu., thence North 88021'31" W.st, alona the centerline
of N.W 2Znc1 Avenue a distance of 112." f..t, thence South
0033'53" Ba.t, a distance of 1306.69 feet, thence south
88045'31" last, a distance of 3JJ.51 feet to a point on the Weat
right of way of the se.board co..tline Railroad, thence with a
bearlnv of 80utb 14008'Z3d We.t, along the Weet ~ight ot way oe
the railroad, a di.tanca of 1312.4' feat, thence South 0033'53"
East, a distanc. of 26.19 feet, thence louth 1301S'a2" Welt, .
distance of '20.11 e..,::, thance lIorch ".'0' 04- West, . distance
of 181.60 feet, thence with a bearing North 004"21" We.t, .
d18tp,nce of 200.00 fe.t, thence North 88050'04" We.t, . distance
of 218.00 feet; thence South 004"21" Bast, a distance of 200 00
feet; thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 40 00 feet,
thence South 0049'21" Bast, a dis~ance of 556 84 feet; thence
North 88050'0." West, a distance of 3617.26 feet to a point on
the centerline of the above described centerl ine of the E-4
Canal; thenc& with a bearing of North '018'14" We.t, a d18tance
of 153 13 feet, thence with a curve to the right having a radius
of 450 00 feet, a centra! ang!e of 1503".4", and an arc length
II
I.
ILEGAL DBSCRIPTION I continued I
I!of 122.62 .f.et; thence North 10018'30" S..t, . dietance of
1988.60 f.it to a point of curve, thence with a curve to the 1.
, havinv a radiu. of,~!O.oO feet, . central an91e of l'020'0~
land an are length of It3.99 feet, th.nce with. b..ring of North
18001' 30" we.t, . distance of 1255.1t f.et to a point on the
;Icenterline of H.W. 22nd Avenue, thence with. beftr1n9 of South
;. 8g004' 3211 Meet, along the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue a
Ildi.tance of 817.85 feet .ore or le.. to th. Point of 8eg1nn1ng
!containinv 591.55 acr.e aor. or 1... and 8ubj.ct to .a....nts
and rights of way of record.
\.
EXHIBIT "B"
--.
, ~
-
.
IL....~ ___ ...
I
I
.1
I
I
l
-
c:.s
if
17 ." ""\.
f
i~
~
~
8.1
~4
'll:o
~a
EE
-
I
j"""-
;
-~
I :
..
-......
I
i
n
'----
..
..-.
.IJ
.
'"='="
Lo.....
a~~J
Ztu-t UJO -;ck
(, " (.-') )~ 7 .cl/J;fJ
vt"a,\A0 ~ r .
J \
~S 1\
V ,J
... !
---.,I/J (,! f' t
IL~ ~~~J" .)IJ ~.'.
~c {~U0/ cv "J
r!d~~/~
~
",,(
:011
"
!
W"STEll PI.AN AWINOWINT NO, .
JUlY U. 18..
lr- - U
t "-......,.......... 1D . __ at N
... . ... ... ICIID& ~ II ........ ....
- ........ .. . DUd ~1'1k
. ........ ar .. ,.,.,... .... _ ~ ..-,ao ... c.aD ..
~ ___ ..... "- lIlY ........,
. -_...,-.._-"--
.. ~...... . CLuIl .. ...... II " __ MIA. ... "
: ft.ia.'A".!"'1.'n#__
, ---....---........
~ ~.~-:"""'''~AI'UL....
MASTER
SITE
DEVEL~
LEGEND
(:)
Olr... 11..12 Acre.
orllcl/~ 1,57 Acr..
O'Ilc'/HollI/~ 13.15 Iocr..
OIlIC./HollI 11.57 Acr..
Olllc./R1cO '.0' Act"
O'IIaO/OId 2.U Act..
lodu.,'IoI/C_....... ZI.1I1l A....
'odutl,IoI/RIcO/OIllce 23.111 AC....
loclu."'" 115.35 Acr..
''',D 32.11 Acr..
lIilD/OId 2.40 A.."
O...'"'".ntol/ln.tllut..... 31.110 Acr..
WellOnd. 11.00 A....
Sand PIn. R_ 40.00 A....
Rooell 41.13 A.....
OPEN SPACI: ~ 10.17 Iocr..
Peril.
L.....
O"lntl""
~
(311) 636-':'1600
KEY PLAN
c.-
QUANTUM PARK
TOT Al
S53.1.3 Ac;r..
MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 16,1996
Attorney Cherof advised that he reviewed the language and found it acceptable He
pointed out that this is an example of how the business community can provide information
that we do not comprehend because it is not part of our standard operations
Between first and second reading, Attorney Cherof will incorporate the language into
subsection F in the definition of telecommunication towers
EXECUTIVE SESSION - Finizio v City of Boynton Beach, et al (Case No. CL 91-
9205 AH) and Finizio v Mayor Edward Harmening, the City of Boynton Beach,
et al (Case No. CL 94-3042 AH)
At 9:35 pm, Attorney Cherof announced that the City Commission would recess to go into
an Executive Session that would last approximately one hour Attendees at the Executive
Session would include the members of the City Commission, the City Manager, the City
Attorney, and the City's attorney of record in the legal proceeding, Tom Sheehan The
regular City Commission meeting will resume when the Executive Session is completed,
and there will be no public discussion or announcement following that Session
At 11 :25 p.m , the regular City Commission meeting resumed
x. LEGAL
A. Ordinances - 2nd Reading - PUBLIC HEARING
:Y~~
1 Proposed Ordinance No. 096-33 RE Amending the previously approved
PID master plan in connection with an amendment to the DRI, Quantum Park
PID
Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinance No 096-33 by title only
MAYOR TAYLOR ANNOUNCED THE PUBLIC HEARING THERE WAS NO ONE
PRESENT WHO WISHED TO SPEAK ON THIS ORDINANCE
Motion
Commissioner Bradley moved to approve Proposed Ordinance No 096-33
Commissioner Tillman seconded the motion City Clerk Sue Kruse polled the vote The
vote was unanimous
2. Proposed Ordinance No 096-34 RE Amending Internal Revenue Code
for Police Pension
Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinance No 096-34 by title only
33
MEETING MINU) cS
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 9, 1996
Motion
Mr Aguila moved to approve the minutes of the June 25, 1996 meeting Mr Wische
seconded the motion
Mr Aguila complimented the Recording Secretary for doing a good Job on a very
cumbersome motion
The motion carried 7-0
5. COMMUNICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Report from the Planning and Zoning Department
1 Final Disposition of Last Meeting's Agenda Items
Ms Heyden reported that the Notice of Proposed Change to the DRI Amendm~nt for
Quantum Park went to the City Commission last Tuesday, along with the use approval for
CarMax and a land use change and rezoning to bring in Lots 80, 81, and 82 into the DRI
The latter was tabled until the DRI amendment can catch up
The Quantum Park use approval was approved subject to staff comments and the
recommendations of the Planning and Development Board There was one change with
regard to the timing of the greenbelt plans At the board meeting, a decision was made
that the plans be submitted within 90 days after the approval That timing was moved up
to prior to first site plan approval submitted for a perimeter lot.
The land use amendment was approved for transmittal to the Department of Community
Affairs, subject to staff comments.
After a very long and tedious meeting, a compromise was reached with regard to the
Notice of Proposed Change to the DRI amendment. The DCA was present at the meeting
It was decided that the applicant would revise the master plan to reflect staff comments
Therefore, it was not attached to the DRI with all the comments written into the DRI She
expects to receive the master plan tomorrow The second reading of the Ordinance for
Quantum Park to add in all the conditions and changes, will take place at the next City
Commission meeting
In addition to agreeing to revise the master plan, Quantum Park agreed to designate Lots
53 and 54 as Government/Institutional These are the school lots which are on the west
side of Quantum Boulevard They agreed to changing the timing of getting the traffic
reports for future site plans to monitor the operating conditions Gateway, 1-95 and
Gateway, and High Ridge Road to the time of site plan rather than building permit They
2
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 9,1996
agreed to change the master plan to reflect the cul-de-sac as bemg public Ms Heyden
IS still researching to determine whether excess landscaping will be required
Quantum Park agreed to incorporate the hotel traffic as part of the overall commercial
traffic. and agreed to the square footages Included in the staff report Those square
footages were slightly lower due to changes since the 1983 ADA to allow additional land
uses which correspondingly decreased the commercial square footage Quantum agreed
to upgrade the sewage lift station on Park Ridge Boulevard when the capacity IS exceeded
It is predicted that based on sewage flows when the additional commercial comes In the
11ft station will need to be upgraded
There were 30 commercial acres that were part of the DR\. Quantum was requesting a
total of 83 total acres of commercial The City Commission required them to reduce that
to reflect 30 acres, plus CarMax They are also required to indicate the commercial lots
on the master plan that is attached to the development order The commercial will total
approximately 47 acres
B. Filing of Quarterly Report for Site Plan Waivers and Minor Site Plan
Modifications
Ms Heyden advised that the handout. which was included in the back-up packet. listed all
commercial and residential permits that were reviewed as part of the building permit
process. These are site plan waivers and minor site plan modifications which do not come
to this board for review The purpose of providing this information is to make the board
aware of what is coming and what staff is reviewing administratively
Mr Aguila asked for clarification of the item regarding a red neon stripe on top of
Carrabba's Restaurant on the Target outparcel Ms. Heyden stated that staff has turned
it down, and if they want to pursue it, they have to file an administrative appeal
Chairman Dube acknowledged the presence in the audience of Commissioner Jamie
Titcomb
6. OLD BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing
ComDrehensive Plan Text Amendment (Postponed from June 11, 1996
Meeting)
1
Project Name
Agent:
Owner'
Public Storage, Inc.lPlanning Area 1 q
Mike Carter Construction, Inc
Public Storage, Inc.
..,
-'
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
Mr Willard said the reason we are gOing forward wIth that is because It retains
consistency with the underlying Comprehensive Plan We can bring those three lots Into
the DRI, but we are gOing to simultaneously submit a ComprehensIve Plan request to DCA
to change It from office to industrial Ms Heyden advised that we will process a
subsequent development order to change It back to commercIal There are also two staff
conditions In Exhibit 0 that are still applicable One pertains to the pump statIon upgrade
and one pertains to the traffic. Until we have FOOT's comments, the latter condition needs
to remain
With regard to the comment regarding the pump station upgrade, City Attorney Cherof
advised that even though this was Incorporated In th~ ordinance, the comment still needs
to be Included It will end up being satisfied Immediately upon the adoption of the
ordinance If that language is changed
Motion
Commissioner Titcomb moved to approve subject to the conditions in Exhibit 0, and also
the condition that the use on the master plan for these lots be changed to office Vice
Mayor Jaskiewicz seconded the motion, which carried 5-0
B
Project Name
Agent
Owner'
Location
Description
See discussion under Item VI.A.
.---'
J (.. ~
Quantum Park PIO
James G Willard, Shutts & Bowen
Quantum Associates
West side of the intersection of Interstate 95 and
Gateway Boulevard
Master Plan Modification Request to amend the
previously approved PID master plan in connection With
an amendment to the DRI to add 13 17 acres (the PCD
Center subdivision) to the PiD boundaries and change
the use designation from office to commercial/industnal
use, add the option of commercial use to the eXisting
use designated for lots 65A, 658, 66, 67 A, 678, 67C
68A,68B 69,70, 72, 73A, 738, 74 - 79,83 - 85 and 91
and change the use designation of lots 58, 59, 60 and
61 from commercial to industrial/research and
development/office
~I
~'~
33
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
Ms Heyden stated that all the pOInts discussed this evening have been worked out except
for the floating commercial We agreed to a maximum of 47 acres, however. 83 acres are
still shown on the master plan
Mayor Taylor wanted the commercial moved when projects come In Mr Willard stated
that there IS only one master plan nght now We have proposed an area of approxImately
80 acres within which we could have 47 acres of commercial By adding the 30 acres
maximum In the notes we have the assurance that even though we have commerCial
Identified as a permitted use it is maxed out at 30 acres
Mayor Taylor asked why Mr Willard wants to show 83 acres. Mr Willard agreed to
designate SIX or seven lots that add up to 30 acres and put in the note that at the discretion
of the City Commission, the location of commercial lots could be reconfigured, subject to
City CommiSSion approval City Manager Parker said if Mr Willard identifies 30 acres
around the CarMax, the Commission could approve or disapprove specific lots for
commercial as users come In
Commissioner Bradley asked If it is necessary to designate the commercial lots this
evening Mr Willard did not think so He said the existing plan shows all the commercial
lots on Quantum Lakes Drive The only permitted use is commercial If we move the
commercial, we have no other permitted land uses on those lots. City Manager Parker
advised Mr WIllard that we can add the land uses on those lots this evening. He proposed
to leave the deSignation of those lots in red as commercial with a notation saying that the
location of the commercial can be reconfigured subject to City Commission approval He
said It is difficult to market lots on 1-95 or near this intersection He hoped the CarMax
would be the catalyst that would promote some commercial development along 1-95
Mayor Taylor had no objection to letting Mr Willard put 30 acres of commercial where he
wants to, but he did not want to see 80 acres of commercial on the plan Mr Willard
deSignated the following lots as commercial 81,82,91,678, 65A and B. 64 and 63 He
said he will delete the reference to commercial from all the other lots The previously
deSignated commercial lots will be designated as industrial and office A notation will be
added about the flexibility of moving the commercial around, plus the limitation of a total
of 47 commercial acres.
During a discussion with Mr Stewart and Ms. Heyden, he noted that there is a discrepancy
In the reference to the square footage on industrial Therefore, he proposed to reduce the
square footage from 4 443,120 to 2.784 354 The reason for that is that it reflects square
footage attributable to the acres that wound up being included for the high school site In
34
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUL V 2, 1996
order not to alter the vested trip generation that we have in Palm Beach County, we will
add a line saYing that the vested trips for the project shall remain at 63,752.
~
Mr Willard advised that at Mr Stewart's request, he agreed to add Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council and the DCA to the end of paragraph 3, section 2 of the
ordinance If the intersection of Park Ridge and Gateway were to exceed 2,300 peak hour
trips, it would require further approval by the city, the Treasure Coast RegIonal PlannIng
Council. and the DCA. Also, the ordinance would reflect the amendments that he
discussed in his earlier presentation
Motion
Commissioner Bradley moved to find that the proposed changes do not constitute a
substantial deviation under Florida Statutes, that no further ORI review is necessary, that
the revised master plan does not constitute a substantial change, and that an amendment
to the development order, which is the ordinance on tonight's agenda, be issued subject
to the revisions that Mr Willard discussed with the Commission Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz
seconded the motion, which carried 5-0
City Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinance 96-33 by title only
Motion
Commissioner Titcomb moved to approve Proposed Ordinance No 96-33 on first reading.
Commissioner Bradley seconded the motion A roll call vote was polled by the City Clerk
The motion carried 5-0
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Description
Quantum Park PID
James G Willard
Quantum Associates
West Side of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and
High Ridge Road
Use Approval Request to amend the list of permitted
uses for the Quantum Corporate Park PIO to allow used
and new car sales on commercially designated lots
within the PIO
C
Project.
Agent"
Owner"
Location
35
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
Michael J Melillo, Code & License Inspector
Joanne M Powell, Customer Relations
Robert Ribatto, Foreman I, Parks Department
Theresa Rodriguez, Relief Clerk, Library
Bernard Russell, Bldg Maintenance Mechanic II
Charles S Smith, Sanitation Equipment Operator IV
Archie Underwood, Utilities Maintenance Mechanic II
Victor Wooten, HVAC Mechanic II, Facilities Management
Mark L. Woznick, Firefighter III
City Manager Parker thanked all these employees for their service to the city Mayor
Taylor recognized these employees who have served the city well throughout the year He
appreciated their effort and years of service to the city
3. Presentation of Firefighter Olympic Trophy by Firefighter Martin
Firefighter Martin was not present, therefore, this item was not addressed
4 Employee of the Month - June 1996
City Manager Parker and Mayor Taylor honored Willie Adams as Employee of the Month
for setting a positive example for other employees and for the city when he found a
checkbook, including cash, and turned it into the Police Department
V BIDS
None
VI. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Project Name Quantum ParklPID/PCD Center
Applicant requested continuance to July 2, 1996
Agent James G Willard, Esquire
Owner Quantum Associates
Location 13 93 acres of property at the southwest corner of 1-95
and Gateway Boulevard
Description Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning Request
to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
8
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2, 1996
from Office Commercial to Industrial and rezone from
Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned
Industrial Development (PID) to add into the Quantum
Park PID
At this time, Mayor Taylor advised that a new policy is being instituted this evening to try
to shorten the meetings He asked the presenters to try to limit their comments to eight
minutes and to cover only the pertinent issues He pointed out that the Commission has
extensive backup on all the projects
Mr Cherof advised that the following items on the agenda are quasi-judicial hearings
Quantum Park land use element amendment/rezoning
Quantum Park master plan modification
Woolbright Place PUD master plan modification
Citrus Park PUD master plan modification
Quantum Park PID use approval
He also advised that the record this evening will consist, at a minimum, of the documents
in the Commission backup package If there are other documents that anybody wishes to
have made part of the record, they need to be identified to the clerk, and a copy left with
the clerk. If there are any Commissioners who have had contact with any of the applicants
for these Items, they need to identify that particular contact for the record
At this time, everyone who intended to testify this evening was sworn in by Mr Cherof
Mayor Taylor advised that some months ago, he spoke with representatives from Quantum
when they were originally thinking about bringing these three parcels into the Quantum
PID He also received a call from Anna Cottrell today, asking if he had any questions in
regard to the Woolbright Place project
Commissioner Titcomb advised that he was contacted by Michael Morton a few weeks ago
with regard to the Woolbright Place project, and he has had limited contact with the
Quantum people
James Willard, the attorney for Quantum Associates, stated that there are three items
dealing with Quantum that are all related on the agenda this evening He asked if he could
address the PID use approval (Item XIII C) at the same time that we have the public
hearings because it is a related item The Commission had no objection to this
9
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2, 1996
Mr Willard said the primary application before the Commission this evening deals with an
amendment to the Quantum Park DRI There were three specific objectives that Quantum
Associates tried to accomplish with the DRI amendment There were three lots within
Quantum Park, Lots 80,81 and 82, that were never part of the DRI These three lots are
located just south of Gateway Boulevard at 1-95 Mr Willard displayed the existing
approved master site development plan, dated October 28, 1994, for Quantum This was
adopted by the City Commission when the high school deal came through and the
southwest quadrant was approved for the high school site That was the last significant
change to the development plan He also displayed the proposed master site development
plan dated July 1, 1996 Mr Willard advised that he trying is trying to accomplish three
things with this plan He is trying to bring the three lots into the Quantum Park DRI Also,
a transportation analysis was required at the time the high school was included, analyzing
the operating characteristics of the intersection at Gateway Boulevard and Park Ridge
Road At that time, the Commission requested that this intersection be analyzed because
Park Ridge Boulevard would be abandoned at a portion when the high school was built
Therefore, there was a concern about the operating characteristics at this main
intersection That was the focal point of the transportation study
The third objective was to reconfigure and relocate the approved location of some
commercial uses within Quantum Park. There previously were commercial uses on the
lots around Quantum Lakes Drive We are proposing to identify the area outlined in red
on the chart (primarily along 1-95 and near the intersection of Gateway and Park Ridge)
which would be acceptable for commercial uses In the course of the discussions with the
Regional Planning Council and the city staff, we have identified maximum intensities of
development for different land use categories within Quantum that were contained in the
original DRI application in 1984 At the request of the city and the Regional Planning
Council, these maximum intensities have been reflected on the plan as follows industrial
use, including research and development, approximately 4,400,000 square feet,
commercial, including any hotel rooms, would be limited to a maximum of 426,888 square
feet, and office at 1,685,772 square feet
Mr Willard was seeking approval of commercial uses as permitted uses within these lots,
in addition to the existing office and industrial uses, up to the maximum threshold of the
426,888 square feet, including any hotel rooms He was aware of the concern that the
acreage which may be absorbed by that amount of square footage After further
negotiation with city staff, particularly Carrie Parker, he would not exceed 29 7 acres,
approximately 30 acres, of commercial land use, in addition to the proposed office Car Max
site, which is proposed for lots 77, 78, 79, and 80 That takes into account the originally
approved acreage plus the three lots that are coming into the DRI We would also abide
10
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
by the acreage limitation of 426,000 square feet, which we think is adequate to
accommodate expected development demands for commercial uses in this area Since
the entire park is zoned PID, each specific use has to go before the Planning and
Development Board and the City Commission Therefore, the previous commercial uses
that were approved will be known, including what they look like, how they fit it, how the
character of the park is developing He believed that if it is developing in a positive
manner, the city will be accommodating more conditional commercial uses, if required, in
the future
Mr Willard advised that the plan dated July 1 st incorporates all the changes requested by
the Regional Planning Council He referred to the transportation analysis He advised that
he has received approval letters and consensus from the DOT, the County, and the
Regional Planning Council with respect to the study that was submitted, which identifies
a series of improvements that will be necessary to the Gateway/Park Ridge intersection
as development occurs within the park. As those levels of trip generations trigger,
improvements will have to be made (additional right turn lanes and left turn lanes) It is
already a signalized intersection, but at maximum build out, you will have dual left turns
and a dual right turn Those improvements are identified in the proposed ordinance, as
well as different trip generation thresholds He believes all the other agencies have signed
off on that
At the city's request, we are also seeking the rezoning of the three lots that are coming into
the DRI, which were previously zoned planned commercial development Since the rest
of Quantum Park is PID, it would be appropriate to zone these three lots PID to be
consistent with everything else in Quantum Because of the concern that recently arose
regarding inconsistency with the underlying Comp Plan designation, the land use plan
designation for those lots, we are only identifying them as approved for commercial and
office use, which we believe eliminates the necessity of a Comp Plan amendment which
would have to be sent to Tallahassee and be approved by DCA It is a long and tedious
process and conflicts with our request this evening to have the DRI amendment, since your
DRI amendment has to be consistent with the underlying Comp Plan designations
Therefore, by eliminating industrial, we feel we eliminate the necessity for that Comp Plan
change
The last thing before the Commission this evening is the PID use approval which, because
of the zoning classification, every use of the lot coming into the city has to go through the
use approval process On the four lots that are outlined in yellow on the plan, we are
proposing to authorize that to be used for a auto dealership, specifically, a Car Max super
11
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
store, which is a relatively new concept offered by Circuit City stores He introduced Jim
Thornton of Richmond, Virginia, who explained the Car Max dealership
Mr Thornton stated that Circuit City saw the used car business as an area that had a great
deal of potential for a retailer who had experience in making customers happy and giving
customers what they want. The car business has, in some cases, developed an unsavory
reputation with customers as not being sensitive to customers' needs Circuit City saw an
opportunity to offer customers a wide selection of very late model cars with a quality that
Circuit City stands behind with warranties, and a product the customer can trust, offered
in a very low key, dignified, low pressure environment. The customer experience is
designed to be as close to going shopping for a refrigerator or a stove as Circuit City can
make it. To that end, the Car Max developments are designed to look more like shopping
centers than like what most people associate with used car lots We take away all the
tinsel and search lights and the high pressured salesmen Customers can go through the
entire process without talking to a salesman until the end if that is what they want to do
The development reflects that type of low keyed, dignified approach It tends to be a very
low impact development for the community The traffic generated by a Car Max
development is generally a quarter to a third of what a retail development on the same site
would generate Water is recycled on site, so the utility usage tends to be very low At the
same time, the development generates a substantial amount of benefit for the community
We expect the Car Max to generate between 125 and 150 jobs The median income will
be between $25,000 and $30,000 There will also be a significant tax generation from real
estate taxes, sales taxes, and license taxes There is also a ripple effect throughout the
community since Car Max offers such a wide selection of cars It cannot possibly stock all
the parts for all the cars that it offers for sale, so it relies very heavily on local vendors for
tires, batteries, and parts That ripple effect on the local economy would be in the
neighborhood of about $1 million We think the Car Max development fits in well It is a
low impact, attractive development, and provides significant impacts for the city He
pointed out the four lots on which the Car Max Development will be located
Mr Willard stated that the ordinance is the operative document that changes the DRI This
becomes part of the DRI development order The ordinance reflects all the
recommendations of the Planning and Development Board and staff Mr Willard proposed
the following changes to the proposed ordinance
1 On page 3, in paragraph number 2, the date was changed from June 11 th
to July 1 st to reflect the date of the new plan
12
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2, 1996
2 Paragraph number 4 was deleted This paragraph simply reflects a
designation on two lots, which was a mistake It has been changed and
shown on the plan now Two lots were sold to the high school and should
have been marked as government and institutional That correction has been
made, and since this plan is incorporated by reference as an exhibit, it does
not need to be in the text of the agreement
3 In paragraph number 5, he agreed with Ms Heyden's recommendation to
change "building permit", to "site plan", which puts the provision of the traffic
information a little earlier in the approval process
4 Paragraph 6 was deleted On the face of the plan, we were requested to
reflect the section of Park Ridge Boulevard that would be abandoned once
the high school got built It is shown in cross hatching, and we had
inadvertently extended the cross hatching a little past the cul-de-sac on the
south side It was not intended to close public traffic to that cul-de-sac That
was simply an error when we did the original plan It has been pulled back,
which eliminates the need for paragraph number 6
5 Reword paragraph 7(c) to state "strongly encouraged" instead of it being a
mandatory requirement
Ms Heyden was pleased that Mr Willard agreed to reduce the commercial acreage She
asked if that includes a reduction in the location of the commercial or if he is still asking for
the option on all 86 acres Mr Willard said he is still asking for the option on all 86 acres
City Manager Parker advised that the three lots that are coming into Quantum Park are
13 93, and the lots that are being utilized for Car Max are 17 11, or a difference of 3 18
additional acres if paragraph 7(c) is reworded as Mr Willard suggested
Ms Heyden wanted this to be a requirement, especially on Gateway Boulevard, and that
a comprehensive landscape plan be devised with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council, who frequently provides this service for free to cities She would like this done
prior to the first site plan submittal
City Manager Parker pointed out that one of the difficulties is that Quantum does not know
who is going to come in on what lot. They have to come in for use approval prior to
submitting a site plan For example, if they come in with a lot and a use on Gateway
13
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
Boulevard, the Commission can require additional landscaping if they feel it is needed for
that particular use
Mr Willard strongly objected to doing a landscaping design package, especially with the
Regional Planning Council, for unknown uses He said landscaping is an important
component of how it looks when you drive by on 1-95 or when you drive along Gateway
He agreed, as the Planning and Development Board had recommended, to do enhanced
landscaping and show it on site plans as they are submitted to the city on a case by case
basis for any commercial use in this area
Commissioner Bradley mentioned the perimeter greenbelt City Manager Parker advised
that Mr Willard is referring to the traffic along Gateway Mr Willard stated that the 1-95
frontage specifically creates the issue of the peripheral greenbelt, however, that is not the
intent of this particular paragraph
Mr Willard reiterated that he would be happy to address the landscaping characteristics
of those particular lots as they come in for site plan approval To try to create standards
in advance, not knowing the nature of the use, how tall the building is going to be, what the
setbacks are going to be, and what it is that you are trying to buffer or not buffer, is
extremely difficult You wind up with standards that are meaningless and very hard to
apply on a case by case basis without substantial waivers or variances when the user
comes in
Ms Heyden said that is like saying you cannot have a landscape code in the city until you
know what uses are coming in She felt you can plan ahead The people who do this for
a living are very familiar with this kind of work and can do this so it is not onerous and is
not a problem for each use as it comes in Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, as
part of this DRI, does not look at the local issues as we do It is up to us to see that we are
protecting ourselves and our city They have offered this service They have done this for
other cities It is something that can be done ahead of time We are not going to get the
continuity that we are looking for with our planned districts if we wait and do it on a lot by
lot basis
Mr Willard said there is a landscape code We are talking about enhanced landscaping,
something over and above what the landscaping code already requires Quantum Park
has a very expensive lush landscaping plan all through the park, through the medians and
along the rights-of-way The standard has been established there that at the very
minimum, it is going to be maintained and probably increased for commercial uses that
would otherWise be visible along Gateway He did not think there is a basis to be
14
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
concerned about a deficient level of landscaping associated with the quality of the project
and the price that people are going to pay for the ability to locate on these lots
6 Delete paragraphs 8 and 9
Mr Willard said that information is reflected on the plan The plan would have to be slightly
changed to reflect the 30 acre limitation on commercial
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz asked where the hotel site would be Mr Willard said there are five
lots that are designated for hotel usage
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz asked if small commercial establishments could be put in instead
of a hotel site Mr Willard answered affirmatively
City Manager Parker advised that Mr Willard has offered to limit the commercial to 30
acres, in addition to the Car Max, anywhere in that location For example, if a Shell station
came in on the corner and the City Commission did not want to approve that use, they
could deny it comes in for use approval Mr Willard added that there is still a site specific
approval process that we have to go through on every single lot, regardless of what is done
tonight
City Manager Parker advised that Mr Willard agreed not go with the whole 86 acres
Mr Willard said that is correct It simply identifies the boundaries of the area where
commercial would be permitted
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz asked if the area that was originally set forth commercial will
continue to be commercial Mr Willard said, "No"
The deletion of paragraph 8 was acceptable to Ms Heyden However, she advised that
there has not been a revised traffic study Greg Stewart from the Department of
Community Affairs in Tallahassee was present to discuss his concerns with the
development order Ms Heyden understands that although they agreed to it, it has not
been revised yet in a traffic study, which would need to be done prior to the development
order being approved
With regard to paragraph 9, Ms Heyden said she has not seen the revised master plan,
but will take Mr Willard's word for it.
15
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
7 Reword paragraph 11 to state as follows The sewage lift station serving
Park Ridge Boulevard shall be upgraded at Quantum's expense at such
time as development generates sewer flow in excess of the lift station
capacity as reasonably determined by the Utilities Department
Mr Willard recognized that, depending upon the level of development, we may exceed the
capacity of that particular lift station, in which case it has to be expanded
City Manager Parker asked Mr Willard if he realizes that it may not be actual flow It may
be permitted or planned capacity, which would necessity an upgrade Mr Willard
answered affirmatively
This revised language was acceptable to Ms Heyden
Ms Heyden stated that an unexpected issue arose on Friday, and we struggling with how
to deal with it We were looking to change the zoning and the land use of the acres that
are being added to the DRI from PCD to PID The problem with dropping out the land use
amendment and going forward with the rezoning is that this zoning category is not allowed
under the current land use Therefore, in order to change the zoning to PID, you would
need a corresponding land use amendment. We have not discussed whether we want to
exclude industrial as an option on those lots Ms Heyden recommended that those not
excluded because of their locations, and for the same reasons that she has concerns with
additional commercial being added But right now, if we drop the land use amendment
application, there is no corresponding application to change the PCD master plan and the
uses that are allowed on that application The DCA today would entertain an expedited
review of this land use amendment Ms Heyden believed this could be worked out,
however, the three parties involved would have to discuss this
Mr Willard did not believe the Comprehensive Plan amendment is necessary if those three
lots are designated as commercial or office There are three levels of regulatory control
over this project which the city has available to it You have a future land map which has
very generic designations of different areas of the city You then have the zoning code that
specifies particular zoning categories within which there are all kinds of permitted uses and
prohibited uses On thiS project, it is a DRI So in addition, you have a development order
which requires a master site development plan For reasons unbeknownst to him, the
original master plan for Quantum had extremely specific uses designated on every single
platted lot which has continued to be a problem to this date because it makes flexibility
almost impossible It is very constraining to how you market the property when you have
a site specific plan like this that designates each and every lot for a particular use That
16
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
is why we are proposing that some of these lots be changed We are trying to achieve a
certain level of flexibility You cannot amend a development order in DRI to a land use
inconsistent with underlying Comprehensive Plan Zoning does not matter So if the
underlying Comprehensive Plan designation for these three lots is office and commercial,
which is what we were told they were, then by eliminating the industrial land use category
on the master plan, we are now consistent with the underlying Comprehensive Plan
because the development order for the DRI, by this plan, limits it to commercial and office
Mr Willard said he talked to Jim Snyder of the Regional Planning Council today and he is
satisfied with that and does not feel that a Comprehensive Plan amendment is necessary
Ms Heyden said the problem is the land use is office/commercial, not office and
commercial We have a separate category called local retail commercial that would allow
the kinds of uses Mr Willard is talking about Therefore, it is not allowed in the current
land use She explained that the current designation is office and Mr Willard is proposing
to add commercial in addition to office Last Friday it was office/industrial/commercial
Now they are asking tonight to drop the industrial, and City Manager Parker suggested
dropping off the commercial designation as well to solve this problem
Mr Willard stated that for the last 10 years, three lots were zoned planned commercial
district He asked if that has been inconsistent with the underlying Comprehensive Plan
designation Ms Heyden said it has not been inconsistent because the master plan that
governs that PCD allowed for office use, not commercial use She said there are no uses
in the PCD It is governed by the master plan It is a little complicated because Mr Willard
said this master plan has been tied up in the DRI The master plan required for a DRI is
more conceptual than the master plan that we would require for a planned district. She
spoke to the Treasure Coast about this on Friday She said maybe it is time for us to break
apart the two master plans so that when Mr Willard wants to add a land use and move it
around, it is done locally as a master plan amendment instead of by a notice of proposed
change
Ms Heyden said Mr Willard has had a lot of frustration during the past couple of years that
he has been involved in this project because this master plan is very detailed It is more
detailed than a regular DRI master plan because the zoning district for Quantum Park
requires a master plan She discussed this problem with Treasure Coast and they told her
about other ORis in which there were similar problems They wrote into the development
order the splitting apart of the two master plans so that there is a DRI master plan that
would have the maximum acreage and square footage on it. Then you would have the
local master plan that would show where all those uses are located When there is a
change to that, it would come through the local process only as a master plan modification
and a notice of proposed change would not have to be filed with the State
17
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY2,1996
Mayor Taylor asked how long this process will take Ms Heyden advised that it can be
added into the development order that the Commission will be approving two weeks from
now City Manager Parker advised that an amendment could be made between first and
second reading of the ordinance
Mr Stewart did not believe amendments could be made between first and second reading
Therefore, first reading would have to be postponed until the development order is
amended He said this would allow time to clarify some other issues of concern between
the local government, the Regional Planning Council, and the Department of Community
Affairs
Mr Willard was not aware of these other issues Mr Stewart said he has not received the
letter from FOOT Mr Willard advised that it has been issued, however Mr Stewart said
it needs to be in hand He hopes that resolves a lot of the issues with the transportation
because that was the biggest State concern The second issue was with the flexibility with
the land uses and the square footage Looking at the new land use map, he can kind of
tell that at least what we had talked about on the telephone was done, including tying the
hotel into the acreage However, he said Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz brought up a good point
regarding where that hotel site would be Since you have it flexed into all of the actual
square footage of the commercial, it could actually wind up at any location There are
different trip generation rates, and he was not sure what Treasure Coast and Maria
Palombo's review of the transportation plan said Therefore, there are some issues that
need to be resolved
City Manager Parker asked Mr Stewart if he could provide the standard State language
to split the two master plans so we could insert it this evening instead of making the
amendment change between first and second reading
Mr Stewart asked for a recess so all the parties involved could discuss this matter
Mayor Taylor opened the public hearing
Henrietta Solomon, 230 N E 26th Avenue, stated that there was much discussion in the
past about used car dealers, and they are not wanted in Boynton Beach
Lee Wische, 1302 S W 18th Street, said for six years this acreage was zoned industrial
and they could not get anybody in He said the consensus at the visions conference was
as follows
18
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
. Create a more user-friendly government structure, especially for Cod e
Enforcement and Zoning divisions
. Develop a task force to determine how to encourage businesses to locate in
Quantum Park.
. The current development approval process is not flexible enough to attract
future development The City Commission and other boards also need to be
more flexible in their attitude toward development. The city must streamline
its permitting process to accommodate economic development and might
study other cities considered user-friendly by the business community and
apply their techniques to Boynton Beach A task force could be set up to
review the development codes
Mr Wische asked if we are here to help or to hinder
Marshall Friedland, 330 N E 26th Avenue, spoke about how difficult it is to change
indentured land, land nailed down so tightly that the development of the land cannot follow
a natural flow He stated that Circuit City is an honest company that does as they say
They have an excellent track record He felt this new concept of merchandising used
automobiles is exciting, and pointed out that this land has lay vacant for years He felt this
project will beautify the land and generate dollars and jobs for our community
No one else wished to speak.
Mayor Taylor summarized that with regard to the land use, we are talking about bringing
three other parcels into Quantum Park and changing the land use and zoning With regard
to designation of commercial/industrial/office, the applicant is asking to move commercial
lots to another area and designate it commercial We also have to consider the Car Max
proposal He said the traffic issue needs to be settled Another concern is landscaping
The applicants want 7(c) of the proposed ordinance to be reworded to state "strongly
recommended" instead of "required" There is also a question of whether the landscaping
should be done now with an overall plan, or lot by lot.
Mayor Taylor said we have approved 30 acres of commercial in Quantum Park. We are
talking about adding another 17 acres with the three lots that are coming in That would
bring it up to 47 acres In his mind, we have increased the allowable commercial by at
least 50 percent He did not object to this, however, he objected to moving all the
commercial over to one area all at one time without knowing what is going on that land
He wanted to leave the 30 acres where they are and move them lot by lot. Vice Mayor
19
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2, 1996
Jaskiewicz agreed with Mayor She was concerned about what could go on those
particular lots, however, she had no objection to the Car Max
Commissioner Tillman did not have any problems with the Car Max However, there are
many issues that have to be dealt with in terms of this blanket issue of adding 50 percent
of commercial land He had no problem with additional commercial land, but he would like
to know what that land is going to be used for
Commissionel~it.anDwas supportive of the mechanisms necessary to get Quantum Park
going However, he was concerned about the concept of rotating commercial use around
in a large area like this His fears stemmed from the point of meeting a condition that
relates to adjacent and contiguous lots to prevent leap frog inclusion zoning He was
supportive of the Car Max concept and including the new lots to the northeast into the
master plan However, he was afraid that if we approve Car Max there, approve another
commercial development in the three lots outlined in red on the chart, another one in the
northeast corner, and one in the very south tip of the overall zone, who is to say that a few
Commissions from now there will not be an intelligent argument to be had to turn this area
into commercial because it is surrounded by commercial He did not have any problem
with giving the Quantum people the acreage they want, or with the Car Max concept,
however, his biggest concern is the floating commercial We need to know what is going
in there before we give a blanket floating situation One other concern he had was with the
landscaping ahd the look of this area He had a certain amount of faith that Quantum and
some of these other companies involved are going to put in very nice landscaping It is
part of their image and their mission, however, he thinks we have a little leverage to
consider the look of Quantum Park and how it is viewed by 1-95 and the city He referred
to the new landscaping going in at the interchanges at 1-95 and at Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Woolbright and would like similar treatment to be encouraged at Quantum,
such as rows of Palm trees that mirror the look that the whole corridor is taking He would
like to encourage that or look for mechanisms that we can marry that to the approvals of
the usage of the land Generally, he gets the feeling that we do not want to see an
outparcel haven on this Quantum site He felt it was possible to find a compromise where
we get some overall usage commitments and O'lI'~-beautmeatto" eommrtfTlems in return
for flexibility
Commissioner Bradley felt the overall vision that Quantum Park was initially begun under,
which is an industrial park, is important. He agreed that flexibility is important He is not
opposed to the increase in commercial, but he felt it was important that the overall
industrial feel and flavor of Quantum Park stay in tact He pointed out that industry is
20
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
important to families in terms of providing jobs and a tax base that is different from retail
He mentioned the feeder school concept, which revolved around the idea that graduating
seniors might become part of a job pool that would keep them in this community, and their
children would end up going to Poinciana Elementary School, etc He wanted the quality
of life in Boynton Beach to be high and positive so that people would not relocate Industry
is a key component to that. If we can bring in more companies along the technology lines,
he felt we will be doing a great thing He felt there needs to be a mechanism that will
ensure that the commercial development does not happen haphazardly and that there are
enough controls and checks in place that will make sure that it happens in a way that is
going to make for a good commercial corridor, but at the same time not make things too
lopsided in that development.
Commissioner Bradley had concerns about the greenbelt around the entire perimeter of
Quantum Park He thinks this is very critical, especially if we are looking at reducing the
buffer at 1-95 from 40 feet to 25 feet. He understands the concerns that the applicant has
made about there being a 40 foot buffer because there are homes adjacent. However, he
pointed out that they are across eight lanes of traffic He wanted a plan to put the
perimeter greenbelt in place, and he wanted it to have native plants If we are going to
reduce it in the area along 1-95, he would like it beefed up in other areas He also would
like to see a mix between some exposure and some landscaping along the 1-95 corridor
He hopes the applicant or staff can come back with other projects along 1-95 that have
utilized landscaping effectively, perhaps an understory where you have some low
shrubbery that softens the look and a higher story of Palms, so there is some exposure
and some advertising
With regard to the floating commercial acreage, Mr Willard stated that since this is a PID
zoning classification where every specific use needs to go before the Planning and
Development Board and the City Commission, he did not have a problem with not
designating any particular lot commercial and coming back with a specific site plan He
would simply note that in addition to the square footage limitation, there is a limitation of
30 additional acres of commercial, the precise location of which is subject to City
Commission approval
Mr Willard said clearly the overall thrust and character of Quantum is an
industrial/office/research type park. Despite the commercial development that may occur
here, he felt it is ancillary to the primary focus of the park as an industrial opportunity for
employment centers in Boynton Beach Notwithstanding that 30 acres may be commercial
some day, he felt there is ample absorption of acreage off this industrial throughout the
balance of the park for the foreseeable future He believed the traffic related issues have
21
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2, 1996
been resolved He also believed the Comprehensive Plan inconsistency issue can be
resolved during the break. He said if we can come up with a mechanism to eliminate the
site specific uses on the DRI master plan and leave those as purely local issues, that would
be great.
Mr Willard had no objection to developing a peripheral greenbelt plan He stated that
there was a need for some clear understanding as to what the periphery of Quantum is
going to look like Clearly, the 1-95 frontage is going to be treated one way It is not just
the eight lanes of traffic on 1-95, but there is a train there as well and there is a difference
in grade You cannot possibly see what is on the other side of the interstate The uses
that will eventually be constructed in this area want that visibility We specifically talked
about types of landscaping plans which help identify the character and the quality of the
development so that you see both the landscaped nature of the project and what is on the
lots He believed a combination of that can be proposed in different widths along the 1-95
frontage It would be easier with respect to Car Max because that is a specific project It
will be a little more generic with respect to the other lots because undoubtedly people will
seek variances from it from time to time as specific users come in However, he felt we
could come up with some guidelines that would have to be adhered to subject to
Commission variance on the other 1-95 lots The other areas that border residential are
to the south across the canal and in this area there is nothing developed right now To the
extent that Quantum Associates still owns a great deal of those properties, a guideline can
be put in place
Commissioner Bradley inquired about the landscaping by the high school Mr Willard said
the School Board owns the high school site and they are exempt from local zoning and
other design controls
With regard to landscaping, Mayor Taylor wanted some consistency that encompasses the
entire theme of the park, including the area along the 1-95 corridor He understands that
there will be some variations due to some exposure, but there ought to be some sort of
consistency to the whole plan The buildings are probably going to be 20 or 30 feet high,
so you can run hedges below so you do not see the cars or the people at the ground level,
but still see the signage and the buildings He did not want to see one person with four
Palm trees and the person next to him with nothing There has to be some sort of
standardization Mr Willard agreed He said that is only in the best interest of the park.
There is tremendous expense and capital investment in landscaping in Quantum today,
even though there are not many users there They certainly want to maintain and enhance
that quality as parcels get developed for the benefit and enhancement of the value of the
rest of the park.
22
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
Mayor Taylor agreed, but felt we should give them a little guidance With regard to the
landscaping on Gateway Boulevard, staff wants a plan up-front before anything goes in
there The applicant wants to do it as users come in Mayora~ felt believes the
Commission is going to be extremely stringent on the appearance along Gateway
Boulevard when it comes to landscaping If the applicant is willing to exceed the landscape
code, he will work with them on a site by site basis However, once the first site gets In and
sets the standard for what we want there, then the others who come in are going to have
to comply with that
Mayor Taylor asked how the Commjssion~ls about approving the landscaping as users
come in Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz concurred ~ith the site plan approval for each particular
one as it is developed Commissioner.... would like to see some consistency When
you drive down Gateway Boulevard, you see a lush green area and he \/Yo.wld like to
continue to see that, in addition to development Commissioner Bradley agreed ttlat we
can trust Mr Willard to do the right thing
At this time, the parties involved in the Quantum projects left the Chambers to discuss the
outstanding issues, and Public Audience was dispensed with next
VII PUBLIC AUDIENCE
Paul Pfenninger, 4085 Floral Drive, said he is the spokesperson for property owners who
live north of Gateway and south of Sausalito Place He advised that Sausalito Place has
blocked all of their drainage Their homes will flood Sausalito issued the property owners
an ultimatum They wanted them to sign a letter of agreement stating that they would put
pipes in but that they would not guaranty that they will work. The property owners would
not sign the agreement
City Manager Parker advised that Floral Drive is in the County Sausalito Groves was
permitted in the county and then the city annexed them after the property was already
permitted in the county It was permitted to County standards, which are very similar to city
standards in that no water from Sausalito goes onto Mr Pfenninger's property The
problem is that the homes located on his street are older homes on one street that was
basically in the middle of the orange grove Their water was draining onto Sausalito The
letter that Mr Pfenninger distributed was an attempt by the developer to assist the
homeowners The developer has met all the criteria to hold his own water on his own
property These homes that are on this street do not have any drainage because they are
older homes There is no drainage available to them When Sausalito went through their
23
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY2,1996
to the issue of the recreation area The pool almost sits on the down and is adversely
going to affect the neighborhood He could not support this project
Commissioner Titcomb felt the 25 foot buffer was important He has not seen any
creativity to redesign this project. He said we ask developers on a regular basis to make
concessions That is part of the process He saw nothing significant or new to change his
mind about this project Since he did not have a consensus of all the residents and city
staff, he could not support this project.
Commissioner Bradley would have liked to seen more concession in the area of the buffer
He would have preferred a single-family project, however, he respected the neighbor's
desires
Mayor Taylor was concerned about the pool being closer to the adjacent development
What he heard to night is that people supported this because they preferred single-family
over multi-family He pointed out that they were not asked about the buffer Also, to get
the 2 5 feet, the applicant has cut some of the lots, and they are already small enough
Michael Morton appreciated the Commission's reconsideration of this project He
disagreed with Gary Lehnertz He said the neighborhood has spoken and he has heard
a consensus against single-family and the 125 foot buffer He thanked the Commission
for giving him the opportunity to go back to the neighborhood He said he will come back
with a plan with another design in the future
Ms Cottrell withdrew this application
At this time, the parties involved in the Quantum Park projects returned and those items
were discussed next
VI PUBLIC HEARING
A. Project Name Quantum Park/PID/PCD Center
Applicant requested continuance to July 2, 1996
Agent James G Willard, Esquire
Owner Quantum Associates
Location 13 93 acres of property at the southwest corner of 1-95
and Gateway Boulevard
33
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
Description
Land Use Element Amendment/Rezoning Request
to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
from Office Commercial to Industrial and rezone from
Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned
Industrial Development (PID) to add rnto the Quantum
Park PID
Ms Heyden advised that an agreement was reached to proceed with the land use element
amendmenVrezoning Therefore, we need an action to transmit this to the Department of
Community Affairs The only change is the use as office rather than commercial
Mr Willard said the reason we are going forward with that is because it retains
consistency with the underlying Comprehensive Plan We can bring those three lots into
the DRI, but we are going to simultaneously submit a Comprehensive Plan request to DCA
to change it from office to industrial Ms Heyden said we will process a subsequent
development order to change it back to commercial There are also two staff conditions
In Exhibit 0 that are still applicable One pertains to the pump station upgrade, and one
pertains to the traffic Until we have FDOT's comments, the latter condition needs to
remain
With regard to the comment regarding the pump station upgrade, City Attorney Cherof
advised that even though this was incorporated in the ordinance, the comment still needs
to be included It will end up being satisfied immediately upon the adoption of the
ordinance if that language is changed
Motion
Commissioner Titcomb moved to approve, subject to the conditions in Exhibit 0, and also
the condition that the use on the master plan for these lots be changed to office Vice
Mayor Jaskiewicz seconded the motion, which carried 5-0
Description
Quantum Park PID
James G Willard, Shutts & Bowen
Quantum Associates
West side of the intersection of Interstate 95 and
Gateway Boulevard
Master Plan Modification Request to amend the
previously approved PID master plan in connection with
an amendment to the DRI to add 13 17 acres (the PCD
Center subdivision) to the PIO boundaries and change
the use designation from office to commercial/industrial
use, add the option of commercial use to the existing
B
Project Name
Agent
Owner
Location
34
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
use designated for lots 65A, 65B, 66, 67 A, 67B, 67C,
68A, 68B, 69, 70, 72, 73A, 73B, 74 - 79,83 - 85 and 91,
and change the use designation of lots 58,59,60 and
61 from commercial to industrial/research and
development/office
See discussion under Item VIII.A.
Ms Heyden stated that all the points discussed this evening have been worked out, except
for the floating commercial We agreed to a maximum of 47 acres, however, 83 acres are
still shown on the master plan
Mayor Taylor wanted the commercial moved when projects come in
Mr Willard said there is only one master plan right now We have proposed an area of
approximately 80 acres within which we could have 47 acres of commercial By adding the
30 acres maximum in the notes we have the assurance that just because we have
commercial identified as a permitted use, it is maxed out at 30 acres
Mayor Taylor asked why Mr Willard wants to show 83 acres Mr Willard referred to the
lots that are presently zoned commercial and said that is one area where he does not
believe will be commercial He agreed to designate six or seven lots that add up to 30
acres and put in the note that at the discretion of the City Commission, the location of
commercial lots could be reconfigured, subject to City Commission approval City Manager
Parker said in other words, identify 30 acres around the Car Max and the Commission
could approve or disapprove specific lots for commercial as users come in
Commissioner Bradley said because we are
asked if it is necessary to designate some tonight Mr Willard did not think so Mayor
Taylor did not un
Mr Willard said the existing plan shows all the commercial lots on Quantum Lakes Drive
The only permitted use is commercial If we move the commercial, we have no other
permitted land uses on those lots City Manager Parker advised Mr Willard that we can
add the land uses on those lots this evening
the proposal is to leave the designation of these lots in red as commercial with a notation
saying that the location of the commercial can be reconfigured subject to city Commission
approval It is difficult to market lots on 1-95 or near this intersection We figure the Car
Max is going to be the catalyst that would promote some commercial development along
1-95
35
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2,1996
Mayor Taylor had no objection to letting Mr Willard put 30 acres of commercial where he
wants to, but he did not want to see 80 acres of commercial on the plan Mr Willard
designated the following lots as commercial 81,82,91, 67B, 65A and B, 64 and 63 He
said he will delete the reference to commercial from all the other lots The previously
designated commercial lots will be designated as industrial and office A notation will be
added about the flexibility of moving the commercial around, plus the limitation of 47 acres
total In a discussion with Mr Stewart and Ms Heyden, we noted that there is a
discrepancy in the reference to the square footage on industrial, so we are proposing to
reduce that 4,443,120 to 2,784,354 The reason for that is that it reflects square footage
attributable to the acres that wound up being included for the high school site In order not
to alter the vested trip generation that we have in Palm Beach County, we will add a line
saying that the vested trips for the project shall remain at 63,752
The only other changes to the ordinance other than those previously discussed, There is
one other request that Mr Steward requested which we are agreeable to making in the end
of paragraph 3, section 2 of the ordinance, which deals with what happens if the
intersection of Park Ridge and Gateway were to exceed 2,300 peak hour trips, it would
require further approval by the city, and we are going to add the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council and the DCA. Also, the ordinance would reflect the amendments that I
discussed in my earlier presentation
Motion
Commissioner Bradley moved to find that the proposed changes do not constitute a
substantial deviation under Florida Statutes, that no further DRI review is necessary, that
the revised master plan does not constitute a substantial change, and that an amendment
to the development order, which is the ordinance on tonight's agenda, be issued subject
to the revisions that Mr Willard discussed with the Commission Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz
seconded the motion, which carried 5-0
City Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinance 96-33 by title only
Motion
Commissioner Titcomb moved to approve Proposed Ordinance No 96-33 on first reading
Commissioner Bradley seconded the motion A roll call vote was polled by the City Clerk
The motion carried 5-0
VIII DEVELOPMENT PLANS
C
Project
Quantum Park PID
36
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JULY 2, 1996
Description
James G Willard
Quantum Associates
West side of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and
High Ridge Road
Use Approval Request to amend the list of permitted
uses for the Quantum Corporate Park PID to allow used
and new car sales on commercially designated lots
within the PID
Agent
Owner.
Location
See discussion under Item VIII A.
Motion
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz moved to approve the request to amend the list of permitted uses
for the Quantum Corporate Park PID to allow used and new car sales on commercially
designated lots within the PID, subject to staff comments Commissioner Tillman
seconded the motion
In response to Mayor Taylor regarding the specific lots, Ms Heyden advised that this
specifically refers to lots 76,77,78,79, and 80 Regarding the staff comments on Exhibit
G, staff comments 1 through 8 and then two additional comments from the Planning and
Development Board
Ms Heyden advised that Mr Willard and she have agreed to delete Planning and
Development Board comment number 2 on Exhibit G, which reinstates comment number
7 of the staff comments This pertains to the issue Commissioner Bradley brought up
regarding the greenbelt They have agreed to turn in that greenbelt comprehensive plan
prior to the site plan approval for Car Max rather than the 90 days, in the event the site plan
comes in before 90 days In that case, City Attorney Cheraf stated that comment number
2 would be rejected
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz restated the motion
Motion Restated
Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz moved to approve the request to amend the list of permitted uses
for the Quantum Corporate Park PID to allow used and new car sales on commercial
designated lots within the PID, subject to staff comments Commissioner Tillman
seconded the motion, which carried 5-0
City Attorney Cherof thanked Mr Stewart for coming from Tallahassee to this meeting
37
MEETING Mlt<-... TES
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25, 1996
Knuth Road PCD Major Site Plan Modification for Signage
- This board's recommendation regardrng curved tops for all
signs and substituting Sign Band 0 to lower the size of the
sign was approved by the City CommIssion
Discussion Item Relating to Telecommunications
Ordinance - This Ordinance was scheduled for second
reading at the last City Commission meeting It is being
readvertised and will be back before the City Commission on
July 2
With regard to this item, the Planning and Development Board discussed the possibility of
a half-mile radius or a one-mile radius between poles Ms Heyden mapped this, and
found that a one-mile radius was very, very large Her recommendation is for as half-mile
radius
Mr Aguila questioned whether when it was mapped out, there would still be room for a
"toothpick factory" Ms Heyden responded that there are a lot of sites, but this use is
subject to conditional use approval The sites are scattered and some are as close a one-
quarter mile apart
6. OLD BUSINESS.
None
7 NEW BUSINESS.
A. SUBDIVISION
Master Plan Modification
1
Project:
Location
Agent:
Owner'
Description
Quantum Park PID
West side of the intersection of Interstate 95 and
Gateway Boulevard
James Willard, Shutts & 80wen
Quantum Associates
Request to amend the previously-approved PID master
plan in connection with an amendment to the DRI to
add 13 17 acres (the PCD Center subdivision) to the
PID boundaries and change the use designation from
office to commercial/Industrial use, add the option of
commercial use to the existing use designated for lots
65A, 658, 66, 67A, 678, 67C, 68A, 688, 69, 70, 72,
3
---
-----~-
MEETING MINU", ~5
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25, 1996
73A, 738, 74-79. 83-85, and 91, and change the use
designation of lots 58, 59, 60, and 61 from Commercial
to Industrial/Research and Development/Office
James Willard. Attornev for Quantum Associates, introduced Steve Godfrey of Kimley-
Horn Mr Godfrey is Quantum Associates' transportation expert and the analyst who
prepared the traffic report
Unlike the previous matters previously addressed by this board which dealt with the use
approval for the CarMax site and the rezoning of the three lots coming into Quantum Park,
there are three pnmary objectives to the DRI amendment request
1 The first objective is to bring the three lots into the DRI that were the subject
to the rezoning and use approval These are Lots 80,81, and 82
2 The second objective is relative to Quantum Associates' desire to relocate
and expand the land area on which commercial development would be a
permitted use
Mr Willard displayed three charts One of the charts reflected the existing master site
development plan for Quantum Park as currently approved The last approval date was
October 28, 1994 which was when the school site was approved Highlighted in red on that
chart was the location of the existing lots on which commercial use is a permitted use On
the same chart, the cross-hatching indicates the lots which have office and hotel as
permitted uses
The second chart reflected the applicant's request. This request involves a relocation of
the commercial area of Quantum Park from the area on Quantum Lakes Drive into an area
which IS the 1-95 frontage and around the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Park
Ridge Road This chart showed three of the lots highlighted in red which were already
zoned commercial from the existing approval, four lots highlighted in yellow indicating the
CarMax project, and the additional lots involved in the request.
In response to Mr Aguila's question, Mr Willard explained that the first chart indicates 297
acres of commercial The second chart proposes 70 to 80 acres of commercial
The third chart identified the land use type and amount of density of approved land uses
per the 1984 approved DRI/ADA. The square footages indicated are as follows
.
Industrial
Commercial
Office
Hotel
4,443,120 square feet
426,888 square feet
1,685,772 square feet
400 rooms
.
.
.
4
MEETING MINUTES
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25, 1996
It came to the applicant's attention during discussions with the Regional Planning Council
that they wanted these square footages utilized in the transportation analysis when
projecting buildout of the entire park, how many trips and what kind of land use category
it comes from The applicant went back to the original DRI as opposed to taking acres of
land and multiplying it by the highest FAR (Floor Area Ratio) The square footages shown
are reflected in the transportation analysIs, and the applicant is In agreement with
recognizing them as the maximum permitted categories of those land use types In the
Development Order
3 The third objective of the amendment is to comply with a requirement In the
1994 Development Order that requests the applicant to come back and do
a traffic analysis of the intersection at Gateway Boulevard and Park Ridge
Road
Mr Willard read the following from the City Ordinance which was adopted two years ago
when the high school use was approved and a DRI amendment was prepared
"As part of the next DRI amendment, the developer agrees to perform a
transportation analysis of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High
Ridge Road. That analysis shall be based upon the most-recently proposed
land uses within the DRI and shall be acceptable to the City, Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council, and the DCA. If the transportation analysis
projects a deficient level of service at the intersection, the developer shall
perform such mitigation as necessary to bring the intersection up to an
acceptable level of service Such mitigation may include intersection
improvements or preferably, additional roadway access to Gateway
Boulevard for the lots in the southeast portion of the project."
The reason this was included in the DRI amendment is that when the high school was
approved, it required an elimination of a section of Park Ridge Road What was a loop will
become a cul-de-sac when that section of the road is eliminated There was a concern
over the traffic implications of that elimination of roadway In order to accommodate the
School Board, the traffic analysis was postponed until the next DRI amendment
The primary focus of the report was to analyze the impacts of closing the road, determine
if there is enough access to Gateway Boulevard, and what might have to be done to
improve the performance of the intersection
Mr Willard explained that the City Commission, as the local government, issues the
Development Orders and determines what is approved in a DRI The Regional Planning
Council acts as a clearinghouse to coordinate input and comments from any agency having
an interest in commenting on the DRI The Department of Community Affairs is the only
agency that can appeal a decision of the City The applicant can also appeal the City's
5
MEETING MINU) ...5
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25, 1996
deCISion The application for an amendment to the DRI was sent to the Regional Planning
Council which will coordinate comments from Palm Beach County, FOOT and DCA The
applicant has been dealing with the Regional Planning Council, Palm Beach County, FOOT
and the City The applicant has been In touch with DCA. Their pnmary concern relates
to traffic They are awaiting comments from FOOT The purpose of getting all of the
comments IS to provide Input so that the City can evaluate and make a determrnation It
IS not necessary to have a consensus by all of the commenting agencies
Mr Willard does not believe there wIll be any objection to the applicant's first objective to
add Lots 80, 81, and 82 to the DRI
Mr Willard explained that what Quantum is trying to achieve is greater flexibility in
marketing the property There was a total of 426,888 square feet originally approved for
the DRI The applicant proposed to adhere to that ceiling The Regional Planning Council
believes that the originally-approved hotel square footage (400 rooms) is incorporated Into
the commercial number The converSion ratio is 268 square feet per room If 400 rooms
were built, that would amount to slightly more than 100,000 square feet which would be
applied against the cap The applicant agrees with that. Quantum is hopeful that there will
be one, or possibly two hotels bUIlt somewhere near the intersection of Gateway Boulevard
and 1-95
Quantum is attempting to relocate the commercial to the area where they feel commercial
is Inclined to be concentrated They do not believe it is in the area along Quantum Lakes
Drive It is unknown why the commercial was located in that area. The most likely place
for commercial to take place would be in the area proposed in order to take advantage of
1-95 visibility and the activity around the intersection With this change, there will be over
200 acres left in Quantum Park for industrial and research and development.
With the anticipated development of CarMax, Quantum would like the flexibility of
accommodating commercial users should they wish to locate in Quantum No users have
yet been identified
Steve Godfrev. reaistered Professional Engineer. Kimlev-Horn & Associates.
explained that the Development Order specifies what the traffic study was to undertake
Because of the cutting of Park Ridge Road, there was only one access available for the
eastern portion of the southern part of the development. The goal was to identify to what
extent the existing intersection would accommodate the proposed development. If that
was not adequate, it would be necessary to identify the improvements needed and the
timing for those improvements
During the study, it was found that the intersection, as it currently exists, will need
improvements However, it is an adequate intersection for access for the site Two studies
were conducted Each of the studies targeted the same purpose of evaluating the
6
MEETING MINUTES
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25, 1996
Intersection Both studies used different methodologies, but both came to the same
conclusion The original study did not conform to the way some of the reviewing agencies
prefer to see the study done The applicant took advice from the Regional Planning
Council in terms of the method they like, and from the Department of Transportation In
terms of trip generation rates. As a result of application of the process, the applIcant
identified improvements that are needed for the intersection
It is important to note that the land use that has been evaluated in the analysis IS the one
listed on the charts The traffic study includes the effects and impacts of the full amount
of development.
Mr Godfrey advised that the transportation study indicated that in order to accommodate
the proposed land use, the flexibility proposed in the plan, and the limitation of one access
point on Gateway Boulevard, the following is necessary
1 At 1 ,200 peak hour trips, a southbound dual left must be provided This
would be coming from the north, heading south going toward 1-95 This is a
simple project which includes restriping existing pavement to make two left-
turn lanes.
2. At 1,300 peak hour trips, it will be necessary to provide a second right turn
lane in the northbound direction The right-of-way is available The
developer owns the property and can make those improvements
3 The next improvement would be the addition of a southbound right turn lane,
at 1 ,935 peak hour trips, coming from the north heading south This will take
the project to 2,300 peak hour trips.
These are trips associated with Park Ridge Road. The applicant has created a scenario
of levels of development which is dependent on access in this location, and determined at
what total number of trips the improvements are required to make the intersection work.
The analysis is conservative because it incJudes a significant amount of thru-traffic growth
on Gateway
The applicant has been undertaking coordination with the review agencies as it relates to
the studies. The applicant learned of concerns relative to the first study, and responded
to those concerns in the second study The first study was provided in April, and the new
study was provided on June 10, 1996 On June 19, the County provided a letter
expressing continued concern The County was contacted the following day and the
applicant learned about their concerns.
The County looks at the changes from a single perspective as it relates to their authority
Under the Traffic Performance Standards, the issue is whether or not this proposed project
7
MEETING MINL _S
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25,1996
will generate more trips than what was approved The plan is that It will not generate more
tripS The existing entitlements will not change
Mr Aguila questioned whether or not an argument exists based on the fact that by
concentrating so much potential commercial use to that one intersection, more traffic may
not be created In the entire Park, but the traffic demand is Intensified at that one
Intersection The suggested Improvements may not be sufficient to deal with that
intersection so close to 1-95
Mr Godfrey said that by locating the commercial in this location, the Regional Planning
Council transportation consultant suggested that the orientation of the commercial may be
more toward 1-95 than jf it were in the original location As a result, when the study was
updated, the applicant assumed that a significant increase In activity would occur between
the area and 1-95 There will not be more trips through the intersection than there would
have been However, there will be a change in traffic pattern That change In traffic
pattern (or Intensification) has been taken into consideration In evaluating the intersection
In addition, there is an extra margin included because the applicant Included the impact
of the hotel square footage in the analysis. That impact no longer exists because it is
already Included in the commercial square footage.
Vice Chairman Golden noted that it appears the relocation of the commercial along the 1-95
corridor would attract more external trips Mr Godfrey agreed that this is a possibility
However, he feels it depends on who the ultimate users are in the location In the case of
the analysis, no internal capture was taken All of the commercial activity that is being
generated IS traveling through the intersection and leaving the development.
Mr Godfrey advised that in updating the analysis, consideration was given to DOT's
comments. Mr Willard met with DOT and they have not had an opportunity to review the
June 10 report. They are working on it now There were discussions relative to what was
addressed, their concerns, and the approach that was taken They were in agreement with
the concept of the approach that was taken Treasure Coast recommended the revised
methodology to the applicant. The applicant FAXED the revised report to their consultant
for review before finalizing it to make sure that they were addressing Treasure Coast's
concerns Their consultant is still in the review process
All of the agencies that are reviewing thiS proposal will agree that the improvements
recommended, and the staging recommended, will.provide the desired and appropriate
level of service at the intersection to prOVide an adequate access.
Mr Willard distributed an alternative version of a motion for approval to make it easy for
the members to review the differences between what the applicant is seeking versus what
staff recommends. (A copy of that material is attached to the original set of minutes on file
In the City Clerk's Office)
8
---~_._----
MEETING MINU I es
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25,1996
Mr Willard explained that in order to implement the requested amendment, another
Ordmance must be passed The application process requires submittal of a proposed
Ordinance Mr Willard reviewed the packet contalnmg the draft Ordinance which was part
of the June 11 submittal He asked the members to look at Page 3, Section 2 which
Identifies the tenns of the requested proposal
ParaaraDh 1 recites that Lots 80, 81, and 82 are hereby added and incorporated
into the ORI (ThiS was the first objective he spoke of earlier)
Paraaraph 2 incorporates, by reference, master plan amendment #6 ThiS refers
to Chart #2 which Mr Willard had on display This chart contains the descriptions
of the land use classifications
Paraaraph 3 includes the trigger for making sure the intersection Improvements are
performed. It references the Kimley-Horn study and lists the intersection
improvements as that portion of the project served by Park Ridge Road exceeds
certain trip generation levels, Paragraph 3 continues to list the different levels and
Identifies the necessary improvements to be made
Since the June 11 proposed Development Order was drafted, and as a result of the staff
report, discussions with other agencies including the Regional Planning Council and the
letter received today from them, Mr Willard commented on additional terms he agreed to
incorporate into the proposed Development Order'
1 Lots #53 and 54 were bought by the School Board and
mistakenly not labeled Government and Institutional That has
been changed
2 This is a mechanism for letting the City know how many trips
are going on and when the improvements are needed The
appic:ant has proposed a mechanism whereby, "Concurrently
with the submittal of a building permit application for any lot,
the applicant must submit, in writing to the City, an indication
of the number of trips being generated by any use on any of
the lots (commercial or otherwise) For any lot on which
commercial is an approved use and it is served by Park Ridge
Road access, the applicant must provide information on how
many trips will be generated and the impact of the cumulative
number of trips every time a building permit application is
submitted
3 At the request of the Regional Planning Council, the applicant
shaded in the area of Park Ridge Road that will be closed
9
MEETING MINU'I _$
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25, 1996
when the high school IS built The shading carried over slightly
too far The applicant will cut back approxImately 1Js" so that
the cul-de-sac between Lots #45A and #46A stays open to
public traffic.
4 With respect to any commercial development proposed on
Gateway Boulevard, the applicant will not increase the number
of freestanding signs above one per lot, or the number of
access points to Gateway Boulevard than is currently
anticipated (one access point per lot with cross access
encouraged). The applicant will try to beef up landscaping on
any commercial use on Gateway
As a result of the Regional Planning Council letter to Ms. Heyden, there were three
recommendations One recommendation dealt with parcels 53 and 54 That has been
addressed The second recommendation is that the hotel use should not be considered
a separate use, but part of the commercial The applicant will add a term in this regard
The third recommendation requires that the maximum square footage for the development
(industrial, commercial and office) be identified on the face of the master plan The
applicant has done that for commercIal, but will add office and industrial as well
The applicant requests approval of the proposed Development Order as modified
Mr Aguila stated that he does not object to the relocation of the commercial areas from the
originally-intended areas. However, he pointed out that at the present time, he enjoys the
view along 1-95 because the Quantum Park side of the highway looks so nice He
envisions that this proposal could cause a degradation of that area so that it will look
disastrous Although the applicant is willing to limit the signage to one sign per site, Mr
Aguila would prefer that the signs would be one freestanding sign per site on the main road
access way (High Ridge Road or Park Ridge Road) He does not want to drive along 1-95
and have to view groups of open bays, lots of activity, and lots of roll-up doors with
Industrial uses. He is concerned that by concentrating all of that potential commercial
activity along this corridor, that is what we will wind up with
In addition, Mr Aguila is not convinced on the traffic issue at the intersection of High Ridge
and Gateway He feels it will be a nightmare There are only 600 or 700' from the exit of
1-95 to that intersection Everyone going into that area will go through that intersection and
leave from that intersection When the road is closed off because the school is built, Mr
Aguila does not believe that intersection will be adequate for access. He questioned
whether any consideration was given to opening up along the side of the Publix tract (Lot
55), going across the lake and out to Quantum Lakes Drive
Mr Willard said that Issue arose two years ago when the high school proposal came
10
MEETING MINUTES
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25,1996
through The Fire Department raised the issue relative to emergency access Mr Willard
explained that Mr Aguila's suggestion IS not possible because the applicant does not own
or control that property The likelihood of Publix or the School Board donating land to bUild
a road IS not feasible
Mr Aguila questioned whether it would be phYSically possible to put In a road Mr Willard
did not have an answer to that question however, he said this suggestion has been looked
at because the question has been asked At the map, he Indicated the Publix lot, and the
lake It would be necessary to take off from Park Ridge Boulevard, through the Publix
property around the lake, and either stay within the Publix property or go through part of
the School Board lots, go around another lake and tie into Quantum Lakes Drive Mr
Willard does not believe this is a feasible alternative In addition, nothing in the traffic
analysis indicates a requirement for such a decision Projected buildout of all of the square
footages says the traffic can be accommodated with the Improvements identified by the
applicant. Twenty-three hundred (2,300) peak hour trips become a self-enforcing
constraint on the developer Once the intersection is maxed out, the developer cannot sell
the remaining land
Mr Aguila agreed that Mr Willard's point is defendable He still has concerns about how
the concentration of commercial use will aesthetically affect the 1-95 corridor In addition,
staff has concerns about further subdivision of the lots
Mr Willard feels the 1-95 frontage will attract wholesale type users similar to CarMax
These will be destination type uses The developer does not anticipate further subdivision
of the lots because of the nature of the users. On Gateway Boulevard, it is possible that
a retail user may not want 2% or 3 acres. If any of the lots are subdivided, it will be one of
the lots on Gateway This is another reason why sign control and limited access are
important.
Mr Aguila pointed out that although the developer agrees to limited access and limited
signage, Item #4b of the motion says there will be one access point per lot. If the lot is
subdivided into two lots, there could be two accesses and the applicant would be in
compliance Mr Willard said that was not his intention If one of the lots is subdivided,
there will be one joint access point required (internal driveway to come out of the same
point with an ingress/egress easement common to both) Mr Willard said Item #4b can
be changed to reflect his intention Mr Willard added that if there are two users on a lot,
there will be one sign with two panels and one driveway The limitation is to have one
access point and one sign per land area comprised of the existing lot dimensions as they
are today
With regard to the comment about the aesthetics of the 1-95, if this land is not commercial,
an industrial or office user could go in and build it out. There is no specific sign control
presently He recommended that for commercIal users on lots fronting 1-95, other than
I I
MEETING MINU I ~S
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25, 1996
CarMax sign control should be made a condition of site plan approval that comes back
before the board with a limited conditional use The landscapmg can be handled the same
way Landscaping and signage create the view to the traveling public
Ms Heyden confirmed that site plans come to the Planning and Development Board
However, she feels the standards need to be set now when there IS control
Mr Aguila explained that it IS difficult to set standards for appropriate landscapmg or
sign age without seeing what will be done on the site
Ms Heyden advised that landscaping will be taken care of when the City gets the greenbelt
plan Mr Willard explained that those plans will allow design flexibility so that when a user
comes In, the greenbelt can be customized to the particular use Mr Aguila pointed out
that there still must be an element within the greenbelt to tie all of Quantum Park together
Mr Willard agreed with that remark.
Mr Aguila IS comfortable with Mr Willard's concession on the signage and landscaping
Mr Willard explained that if there is a notation of specific City interest and approval on
landscaping and signage for any commercIal use fronting 1-95 In the Ordinance adopting
an amendment to the DRI, It means more than if it IS buried in the Landscape Code Mr
Aguila suggested the notation be for any commercIal use--not just those fronting 1-95
Ms Heyden said there is an approved sign program for this project. There are
freestanding signs which are monument signs for each individual user along the frontage
ThiS addresses the frontage of 1-95 until the City receives a sign program amendment.
Mr Willard said the applicant does not envision or recommend pylon signs along 1-95
Monument signs and facade signage is okay CarMax is looking for identification, and will
wind up proposing some type of major Quantum identification sign with two or three panels
It will say "Quantum Park" and CarMax will get the top panel There is a prohibition on pole
signs for industrial users
Vice Chairman Golden feels the comments relative to the design issues are appropriate
In addition, there are two other major concerns The first concern is the number of
outstanding impact issues which need to be fully resolved. Those issues are raised in
staff's report and the comments from the external agencies Vice Chairman Golden feels
this forum may not be appropriate to review all of these impacts He feels this should be
going to a substantial deviation review for a more full-blown analysis of these impacts. The
City Commission will have to decide on this request. He pointed out that this proposal has
exposed some of the problems with the high school being incorporated in the Park. Those
problems focus on traffic, the closure of Park Ridge Boulevard, and increased traffic at the
intersection of High Ridge Road and Quantum Boulevard He is in agreement with staff
that there could be negative consequences by relocating the commercial usage to the 1-95
12
MEETING MINUTES
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25, 1996
frontage This may anract users that are strip-type commercial rather than ancillary to the
Park. Vice Chairman Golden feels this IS a major change to the master plan The
comments about design gUidelines may be appropriate, and we should look at them more
closely
Mr Rosenstock questioned whether or not staff has made any recommendations relative
to the design guidelines He was dIrected to Comment #12 of the staff report
Mr Willard explamed that subparagraphs c, e, and f are incorporated m the motion he
prepared However, he requested that the applicant not be held to subparagraphs a b
andd
Vice Chairman Golden referred to Comment #10 on Page 7 of staff's report This
comment is made by the City Forester Some of the lots that are proposed for additlonai
commercial usage back up to the Sand Pine Preserve If there IS an Impact on the
Preserve, this would be grounds for substantial deviation review
Mr Willard stated that the applicant is aware that such an impact would be a substantial
deviation However, regardless of the nature of the land use, there would not be a
detrimental impact on the Sand Pine Preserve Furthermore, Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council has not raised this as a concern to date
Mr Aguila felt this was a "blanket-type comment" and agreed that there is no indication that
the Sand Pine Preserve would be impacted
Vice Chairman Golden further referred to the first two paragraphs on Page 6 of the staff
report. The first paragraph says" further development of regional impact review is
required before the proposed amendment can be determined as not being a substantial
deviation ", and then the second paragraph says, " it is recommended that the
determination be made that the changes are substantial in nature unless the conditions
listed below are incorporated into the Ordinance amending the Development Order " He
asked Ms. Heyden for clarification of these statements.
Ms. Heyden explained that we are dealing with the City's master plan amendment process
and the Regional Planning Council's DRI amendment. The first paragraph relates to the
DRt, and the second paragraph retates to the master plan She explained that she did not
have the benefit of staff comments from the agencies. From the comments Ms Heyden
received from Treasure Coast today, a determination can be made that further DRI review
is necessary She stands by her comments related to traffic. Once that issue is resolved,
no further DRI review is necessary On the local issue, without the conditions 1-12, Ms
Heyden believes this is a major change to the original master plan
Vice Chairman Golden believes that Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering feels there
13
MEETING MINUi -.;:)
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25, 1996
are stili Impact Issues that must be resolved Ms Heyden stated that DCA will object
unless the traffic Issue is resolved
Mr Aguila feels the traffic issue is something which can be resolved He questioned
whether gross square footage was used Mr Willard responded affirmatively
Ms Heyden questIoned why Mr Willard did not include Comment #1 in his amendment If
he used gross square footage Mr Willard explained that this is already contained In the
Statute Knowing that the DRI amendment process must take place by Ordinance, he
would like to try to limit the conditions contained in the Ordinance amending the DRI to
major regional issues that affect the project. Less significant issues can be left to a local
form
Mr Aguila Inquired about the regulations that affect this PIO Ms. Heyden said the master
plan regulates the PID The DRI requirements have less information on them than we
reqUire
Mr Willard reviewed the comments in the staff report
Comment #1 - Mr Willard explained that the way trip generation is calculated, there IS
gross square footage and gross leasable area (GLA) For commercial, the standard used
is gross leasable area.
Ms Heyden advised that Comment #1 came from the Treasure Coast Traffic Engineer
In addition, Palm Beach County uses gross square footage in their analyses. She does
not want to encounter a problem because the applicant is using gross leasable area when
the City is looking for gross square footage
Mr Willard said that when a land plan is given to a traffic engineer to determine the traffic
generation, the gross square footage is converted to gross leasable area. That is the area
that generates the trips. Comment #1 is correct for industrial, office, and any non-
commercial, but the term is gross leasable area for commercial
Mr Godfrey advised that the Planning Council uses the same book he used to make his
determination However, Ms. Heyden explained that the City relies on Palm Beach County
to do its traffic study She will consult with the County
Mr Willard pointed out that this is not a relevant issue at this point because it goes to the
traffic report This is not an issue that needs to be in the Ordinance on the DRI
amendment.
Mr Godfrey reported that he has had discussions with County staff, and their position IS
simple The only roll the County plays is to get involved if the project generates more trips
14
MEETING MINUTES
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25, 1996
than it IS approved to generate. A determination must be made regarding whether this
project will keep the number of trips at the approved level He explained that there is no
proposed change, and there will be no traffic generation for the project, therefore, the
County IS not involved The project will not have any new trips, and the City will get a letter
from the County stating they have no Involvement.
Mr Rosenstock pointed out that this project could be approved pending that confirmation
from the County
Comment #2 - Mr Willard asked that the applicant not be restricted to 29 7 acres
Ms. Heyden feels this is the most important issue other than traffic CarMax will have a
small building with a lot of acreage If there are many of those kinds of uses, they could
use up the acreage limitation, but not reach the square footage limitation The impact is
that there could be more commercial than was originally envisioned in the DRI because
there would be more lots with commercial on them If this is limited to the square footage
and not the 29 7 acres, the amount of commercial could be doubled
Mr Willard stated that is exactly what the applicant would like to have He would like the
flexibility to have more commercial acres so that they do not exceed the square footages
originally projected
Mr Rosenstock expressed concern that the square footage will be used up with a very low
assessed valuation encompassing the square footage as opposed to buildings on it with
higher valuation per occupied square foot.
Mr Willard said Quantum Associates wants to market land and sell it. Even though
CarMax will take up 45,000 square foot and up 14 acres of land, it is not assessed on the
square footage of only the building Notwithstanding the tax assessed value of the
property, the applicant recognizes that they may have 30, 40, or 50 acres of commercIal
land and not exceed the cap. That is the reason why they have a larger area outlined in
red on the chart where they can locate the square footage They are of the opinion that
circumstances demand the change
Mr Wische pointed out that many of the members of the board attended the Visions 20/20
Conference He noted that the word "flexibility" had been used many times this evening
He referred to the report issued following the Visions 20/20 Conference where there are
references to the fact that the City's development approval process is not flexible enough
to attract future development in the City He quoted other statements from the report which
referred to flexibility He said that from what he is hearing this evening, we are not trying
to help. Instead, we are hindering development. He recommended that the board approve
this project subject to the submittal of favorable reports being received from the agencies
The applicant has addressed everything The applicant is trying to establish a tract and
15
MEETING MINU'I_o)
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25, 1996
get it moving They have hired influential marketing people CarMax could be the catalyst
for Quantum Park. Mr Lee feels they can work out all Issues once all of the reports are
received He suggests passing thIs on to the CommissIon based on some of Mr Aguila's
comments regarding the 1-95 frontage
Ms Heyden expressed concern about the 29 7 acres because of the Impact on other
commercial areas In the City Visions 20/20 also talked about the revitalization of Federal
Highway By creating commercIal In Quantum Park, we will be taking It away from other
areas in the City There are 500 000 square feet of approved unconstructed commercial
area on Congress Avenue The City has given time extensions time and time again to
those projects
Mr Wische pointed out that Quantum Park has been zoned for industrial for six years and
they were unable to attract anyone
ChaIrman Dube requested that the applicant return to the review of staff's comments He
realized that the applicant wants Comment #2 removed
Comment #3 - Mr Willard has complied with this comment.
Comment #4 - Mr Willard explained that the first part of the comment refers to Lots #40
and #41 A These lots have a dual government and institution, and research and
development classifications. These lots are subject to a School Board option
Mr Rosenstock questioned whether Mr Willard would be amenable to reducing the
426 888 square feet by the amount of unoccupied space (asphalt) on the CarMax property
Mr Willard responded negatively Mr Rosenstock pointed out that if Mr Willard took that
square footage of asphalt off the 426,888 square feet, Ms Heyden's concern would be
addressed
Ms Heyden explained that the reason the square footage was added to the ADA is that
the traffic engineers need square footage to study traffic. The City set up a master plan
That acreage for commercial is then converted to square footage to determine the
limitation on the square footage It would go against the original intent of the project to now
go back and take the one which is greater
Comment #5 - Mr Willard stated that he will get final comments before the City
Commission meeting next week. Unless DCA appeals because of the traffic issue, the
applicant will have the comments and they can be evaluated It is not relevant if they agree
with the traffic analysis The focus of the traffic study was to identify improvements to the
intersection That has been done
Comment #6 - was addressed,
16
-
MEETING MINUTES
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25,1996
Comment #7 - The applicant has submitted a utility analysIs Mr Godfrey added that
Kimley-Horn responded today WIth an additional analysis and found that the lift station has
more than adequate capacity
Comment #8 - was addressed with respect to the desire for the road connection
However, it cannot be accomplished
Comment #9 - has been addressed and is on the proposal
Comment #10 - deals with the Sand Pine Preserve, and the applicant does not beheve
there will be any impact on that preserve
Comment #11 - is the converse of Comment #12
Ms. Heyden recommended that commercial usage be allowed only on the lots that CarMax
is interested in That amount will then be subtracted from the total 29 7 acres You take
out the option of all other lots and restore Lot #61 as commercial Mr Willard IS not
agreeable with that recommendation
Comment #12c. e. and f are incorporated into the proposal subject to clarification
Comment 12a - The applicant would prefer not to comply with "a" They do not
know why the lots were platted. Every lot may wind up being subdivided at some pomt In
time The applicant does not want to be constrained
Comment 12b - Mr Willard stated that the likelihood of the type of commercial that
will be attracted to Quantum Park is not the strip-type commercial one would find on
Federal Highway or Congress Avenue The applicant feels there will be single users, but
there are concepts with two users in one building. They do not want to be restricted to
single-use buildings This issue can be addressed at site plan
Comment 12d - This is the same as Comment 12b
Ms. Heyden is concerned that there will be carved up lots. However, Mr Aguila feels that
what makes this different is that Quantum Park is like a home You go there because there
is a level of quality you expect to be provided to the public. That mentality tends not to
exist on Congress Avenue He thinks the character of the potential tenant is a different
caliber than what we see on Federal Highway or Congress Avenue
Motion
Mr Aguila moved to approve Quantum Associates' request to amend the previously-
approved PIO master plan in connection with an amendment to the ORI to add 13 17 acres
17
MEETING MINUTe;:;
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25, 1996
(the PCO Center subdivision) to the PIO boundaries and change the use desIgnation from
office to commercial/Industrial use, add the option of commercial use to the existing use
designated for lots 65A, 65B, 66, 67A, 678, 67C 68A, 68B, 69,70,72, 73A, 73B, 74-79,
83-85 and 91 and change the use designation of lots 58, 59, 60, and 61 from Commercial
to Industrial/Research and Development/Office subject to the following
1 Compliance with recommendations In staff report, Comments 1-12 as
amended,
2 Comment #2 of the developer's submitted motion recommendations which
reads, "Concurrently With the submittal of a building permit application for
any lot for which commercial development is a permitted use pursuant to the
Master Site Development Plan (regardless of whether the proposed use IS
commercial or another permitted land use), the applicant shall Indicate In
wnting to the City the number of p.m peak hour vehicle trips estimated to be
generated by the proposed building improvement and also the aggregate
peak hour trip generation for all lots served by Park Ridge Boulevard,
3 Comment #4 as modified, i e., if lots are subdivided, signs and access points
will be shared,
4 That the hotel area is part of the 426.888 gross square feet.
5 That all agreed capacities be identified on the master plan,
6 Delete Items #8, 10, and 11 of staff's recommendations, and
7 That all traffic concerns be successfully resolved with the proper agencies
Mr Wische seconded the motion
Mr Aguila clarified that his Comment #4 implies that by approving the applicant's request
the applicant is not limited to the 29 7 acres.
Amendment to the Motion
Mr Aguila moved to amend the motion to include that in staff's recommendation (Item #2)
commercial use shall be limited to 426,888 gross square feet and that there be no acreage
Mr Wische seconded the amendment. The motion carried 6-1 (Vice Chairman Golden
dissented)
Chairman Dube advised Mr Willard that the City Commissioners read the minutes of this
board's meeting. and listen to the tapes He recommended that the presenter not go
18
MEETING MINUTES
SPECIAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 25, 1996
through his presentation point by pOint. He urged Mr Willard to allow the Commissioners
to guide hIm in providing clarification
Mr Rosenstock suggested that Mr Willard cover all arguments during hIs presentation to
the Commission
Ms. Heyden asked for clarification on a portion of the motion She was of the opinion that
Items 12a, band d were included as well as 12c, e and f Mr Aguila explained that when
he made the motion, he did not mention Items 12a, b, and d It was his intent to delete
Items 12a, band d
Motion
Mr Aguila moved that staff recommendation on Page 7, Items #12a, b, and d be omitted
and not be required as part of this approval Mr Wische seconded the motion which
carried 6-1 (Vice Chairman Golden dissented)
8. COMMENTS BY MEMBERS.
Chairman Dubs advised that he received a copy of the minutes of the last CRAB meeting
At that meeting, there was nothing for the board to consider They have now made a
motion to suspend all future meetings until such time as they are called for a meeting
It is Chairman Dubs's opinion that the Planning and Development Board has far more
expertise than the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board. He would like to approach
the City Commission to request that the CRAB responsibility be shifted to the Planning and
Development Board The CRAB can then be dissolved. Ms Heyden has not objected to
adding any CRAB items to the Planning and Development Board agenda if a decision to
dissolve the board is made
9. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the board, the meeting properly adjourned
at 9:25 p.m
~~ai~~
Recording Secretary
(Three Tapes)
19
/'\
I . '
/2'
L:7
(~
/
.....-
~
APPLICANT'S PROPOSED MOTION FOR APPROVAL
OF THE NOTIFICATION OF PROPOSED CHANGE (NOPC)
TO THE QUANTUM PARK DRI
BE IT MOVED, that the Planning and Development Commission
approves the requested changes to the Quantum Park DRI as set forth
in the draft Ordinance dated June 11, 1996, submitted by the
applicant as Exhibit "0" to the Notification of Proposed Change
(copy attached), subject to the following additional terms and
conditions
4/
(/
Lots 53 and 54 shall be designated for use as "G & I"
(Governmental and Institutional)
c
Concurrently with the submittal of a building p rmit
application for any lot for which commerc a opment
is a permitted use pursuant to the Master Site
Development Plan (regardless of whether the proposed use
is commercial or another permitted land use), the
applicant shall indicate in writing to the City the
number of PM peak hour vehicle trips estimated to be
generated by the proposed building improvement and also
the aggregate peak hour trip generation for all lots
served by Park Ridge Boulevard ~
f ~
'"Revi!le Lhe shat1ed d..1.~a~e roadway at Lot 45A;:a '-
~A~permit public access to the existing cul-de-sac
1
i
with respect to any commercial development along Gateway
Boulevard, the following conditions shall apply
a. There shall be no increase in the number of free
standing signs than is currently permitted (i e
one per lot) !
b There shall be no increase in the number
- oints onto Gateway Boulevard than
~ 4_~ ticipated (i.e one access point per
f~~. ss access encouraged)
I c. Landscaping in excess of that required by the
~ existing PID landscaping code is strongly
-- - encouraged for such commercial uses and will be
evaluated as part of the final site plan review for
such uses.
of access
currently
lot with
ORL95 20612.1 SMW <6',
Drah Date 6/25196
.... '.. ... -.. ......-..
..... .. ..
.. n... .....
"," ..... . .'....,... '.-'.','
ft.'... ........1\'...,' 'iF......... .17..........'.
. -... ..
. - -.. .
.. ......
'.':' ..... '.' "".'
. - ~. .-, ,.
,0.... ...........,,'..
,. ba!:~~tiJI7~t.~~;::!lj
ORDINANCE NO 96-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A DETERMINATION THAT
CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENS IVE DEVELOPMENT OF
REGIONAL IMPACT APPROVED IN ORDINANCE NO 84-
51, AND AMENDED IN ORDINANCES NOS. 86-11, 86-
37, 88-3, 94-10 AND 94-51, DO NOT CONSTITUTE A
SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION UNDER CHAPTER 380 06,
FLORIDA STATUTES, 1996, DETERMINING THAT NO
FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW
IS NECESSARY REGARDING SUCH CHANGES, APPROVING
SUCH CHANGES, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER
(ORDINANCE NOS 84-51, 86-11, 86-37, 88-3,
94-10 AND 94-51) FOR PURPOSES OF INCORPORATING
THE APPROVED CHANGES, AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES
WHEREAS, Quantum Associates, a Florida general partnership
("Developer") is the current owner and developer of the remaining
vacant land within the project commonly known as Quantum Corporate
Park at Boynton Beach Development of Regional Impact (sometimes
hereinafter called the "Quantum Park DRI"); and
WHEREAS, the original Development Order for the Quantum Park
DRI was approved by the City of Boynton Beach (the "City") by
Ordinance No 84-51 and amended by Ordinance Nos 86-11, 86-37, 88-
3, 94-10 and 94-51 (hereinafter collectively called the
"Development Order"); and
WHEREAS, the land subject to the Development Order is
described therein as the "Property" and is incorporated herein by
reference; and
WHEREAS, Developer has submitted to the City a Notification of
Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional
EXHIBIT "0"
Impact ("NOPC") requesting a further amendment to the Development
Order for the purpose of revising the Master Site Development Plan
to reflect the addition of Lots 80, 81 and 82 to the DRI and to
include commercial use as a permitted land use for certain
additional lots within Quantum Park; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of Boynton Beach, as the
governing body having jurisdiction, is authorized and empowered to
consider applications for amendments to development orders
approving developments of regional impact pursuant to Chapter
380.06, Florida Statutes (1996); and
WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered the
testimony, reports and other documentary evidence submitted at said
public hearing by Developer, the City staff and the public, and the
City Planning and Zoning Board's recommendations of the ____ day of
, 1996; and
WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered all of the
foregoing
NOW THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Commission of
Boynton Beach, that said City Commission makes the following
findings of fact:
Section 1 A notice of public hearing in the proceedings was
duly published on the day of , 1996, in The
Post, a newspaper of general circulation in Boynton Beach, Florida,
pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes, and proof of said
publication has been duly filed in these proceedings.
-2-
Section 2. Developer has requested that the Development Order
be amended to include the following provisions:
1. Lots 80, 81 and 82 as per the plat of P.C.D. Center, Plat
Book 60, Pages 106 and 107, Public Records of Palm Beach
County, Florida, are hereby added and incorporated into
the Quantum Park DRI.
2. Master Plan Amendment No 6 to the Master Site
Development Plan for Quantum Park dated June II, 1996, is
hereby approved
3. In accordance with the analysis of the intersection of
Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard prepared by Kimley-
Horn and Associates, Inc. dated April 9, 1996, as
modified by Supplemental Analysis dated June 10, 1996 and
incorporated herein by reference, the following
intersection improvements shall be constructed at such
time as that portion of the project served by Park Ridge
Road exceeds the following trip generation levels:
a 1,200 p m peak hour trips restripe the
southbound approach for dual lefts and a
combination through/right turn lane.
b. 1,300 p.m. peak hour trips construct an
additional right-turn lane on the northbound
approach to provide dual right-turns
c 1,935 p.m peak hour trips - add a southbound
through lane and separate out the through/right
into a through and right-turn only lane
-3-
The Developer shall not proceed with development of that
portion of the project served by Park Ridge Boulevard
which would generate in excess of 2,300 p.m. peak hour
trips without further review of the operating
characteristics of said intersection and approval by the
City
Section 3 Upon consideration of all matters described in
Section 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996), it is hereby determined
that:
A. The amendments proposed by Developer do not
unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives
of the adopted state land development plan applicable to this
area
B The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent
with the local comprehensive "plan and local land development
regulations.
C. The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent
with the recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council on file in these proceedings
D. The amendments proposed by Developer
consti tute a substantial deviation under Chapter
Florida Statutes (1996).
Section 4 The City Commission has concluded as a matter of
law that these proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes (1996), that
Developer is entitled to the relief prayed and applied for, and
do not
380.06,
-4-
that the Development Order is hereby amended incorporating the
amendments proposed by Developer as set forth in Section 2 above.
Section 5 Except as otherwise amended herein, the
Development Order shall remain in full force and effect.
FIRST READING this day of , 1996.
SECOND READING and FINAL PASSAGE this day of
, 1996.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MAYOR
VICE-MAYOR
COMMISSION MEMBER
COMMISSION MEMBER
COMMISSION MEMBER
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
EXHIBITS:
"A" - Amended Master Site Development Plan
ORL9S 20376.1 SMW
-5-
88
THE PALM BEACH POST
MONDAY, JUNE 17, 1996
LEGAL NOTICES
110. ...4
LeGAL NOTIC!
a_nlum P.rk
NOTICI 0' PUIUC HlWllNO
NOTlCIII H...." OlV,N ilia.
CI" Commlnlon of TH' CITY
0' 10YNTON IIACH, fLORI-
DA, .11 conducl . Pubic Mo.r,
In. .1 ?,OO P.... or .. ooon
IlIar,,".r .. Il1o .gend. pot.
BIll. on T....d.I/., ..... I, 1....
III .... CI.. Mon celllml....n
Clt....,,, 100 .... lo,n'"
1...11 ..f..reI"'........
'.:1 'lor, T f.'!!
,t It '"
..n lI.ren.'r." ....tI
.h..... .. Il1o lo.n'.n ....11
Pork 0' C.m_,.. D.v.lOP- i
....n. Ord.r (Orelln.nc. No. ...
") .. .m.nd.d b, Ordl-
n.no.. N... '.,1. N.J7 .nd
18-3. 14.10 .nd ....11 1 .nd d..
I.rmln.llon .. 10 w".lher or I
nol Ih. propo..d cluln". con. I
.mul.. . .ub.l.nll.1 d..I.llon I
'0 I'" .ppro..d d,..lopm.nl ,
.rder wlI" r....ol 10 II.. r.1-
lowlnll dllcrlb.d properl, I..
c.l.d wllhln Ih. corpor.l. Hm-
II. 01 ..,d CIt" purou.nl 10
Ih. r.qu"l 01 Ih. p.rll.. In
Inl....1 .nd In compll.nc.
wllh Ch.pl.. JIO. Florid. SI.I.
ute..
REQUEST OUANTUM PARK
AT BOYNTON BEACH DR'
Form.rl, Bo,nlon B..ch P.rk
01 Commorc. Comp..h.n.I..
D...lopm.nl 01 R'lIlon.1 Im-
p.ct.
LEGAL DE SCRIPT ON:
A Tr.cl 01 I.nd I,nll p.rll." In
Secllon. 18, 17 20 .nd 21,
Town.hlp 45 Soulh. R.nll' 43
E..I, P.I", a..eh County.
Florld_, .ald Treet being more
p.rllculerl, d..crlb.d .. 101-
"w" Comm.nclnll .1 Ih.
Soulhwe.1 corn.r 01 .,Id Sec.
Uon 17: Ihenc. Norlh 1'44'311"
!III, .'onll Ih. W..I Hn. 01
;.cllon 17. . dl.l.nc. 01
1318.10 1..110 . polnlln I".
nl....cllon wllh ,,,. c.nlor.
In8 or N.W. 22nd Avenu., ..
.cord.d In O.R. Book 1738.
'.g. 1886. 01 Ihe Public R.-
~Drd. 0' Palm B.ach County,
'Iorld.; Ih.nc. wllh . b.. ring
" Norlh S9'04 '32" EIII,
.Ionll Ih. c.nlerlna 01 N.W.
!2nd lI.enu., . dl.l.nc. 01
'78.31 ,..110 Ih. Polnl 01 B.-
Ilnnlng; Ih.nc. Norlh
1'44'39" e..I, . dl.lanc. 01
1247.08 1..1 10 Ih. Soulh
IlIhl 01 way IIn. 01 L.W.D,O.
..lor.1 21: IIlInc. Norlh
Ig"OS' 49" E..I .Iong Ihe
loulh rlghl 01 w.y L1n.
W.D.D. Lat.raI21,.' record-
,d In O,R. Book 1732, P'II. :
12. 01 Ihe Public R.cord. 01 ,
'alm Beech County Florida,. I
11,'.nc. 01 635.93 ,..110 Ih"
.nlorln. 01 Ihe L.W,D,D.
quaUzlng Canal E~4t .1 re.. .
ord.d In O.R. Sook 1732;!
.11' 1Il2, 01 Iha Public R.-
ord. 01 p.lm B..ch Counl"
lorld..; thence along the C....
nllne 0' .hl .bove d.'crlbed
.4 C.n.I wllh . cur.e 10 lh.
.1Ih1 h..ln9 . chord b..rlng
I Norlh 10-32'52" EIII. . r.-
lu. 01 150.00 ...1, . canlr.I
ngla o' 4"04'17". .nd .n .rc
1n91h 01 63,29 ,..1: Ih.nc.
onllnu. elonll Ih. c.n'orlln.
. Ih. E.4 C.n'I, wllh . b..r-
III 01 Norlh 12'35'00" EIII, .
..,.nce 01 320,811 1..1 10 .
"IPI 01 cur..; Ih.nc. wllh .
u,.. 10 Ih. I." h..lng . r.dl.
',' ~I 8500.00, . cenlr.1 enlll.
, "S'30", .nd .n .rc '.nlllh
~~1I"'23 ,..,; Ih.nc. Norlh
111,,0" Ea.I. . dl.l.nc. 01
1..18 1..110 . polnl on lho
h L1n. 01 S.cllon 17;
)If.l,. wll" . b..rln" 01 Norlh
~,. ,,'3IH ...t, alono the I
, 1..lIn. 01 S.cUon 17, . dl..
:~o' 01 IIIM.II0 1..1: Ih.nc.
eulh 0'02'11" Eaol. . dl..
,,,.. 01 2821,11 1111; Ih.nc.
.r,h 8g'08' 411" h.l. . dl..
'"... 01 38S.118 I.el 10 . polnl
,Jlh. Norlh rlllhl 01 w., Hn.
('N.W 22nd A..nu. .. ..- I
ord.d In a.R. Book 1738, ;
.11' 18S8 01 Ihe Public R.-
ord. 01 p.lm B..ch Counl"
\orlds; thence South
\I 27'31" EIII, . dl.l.nc. 01
0.00 I..t to the cent.rllne o'
.W 22nd A.enu.: Ih.nc.
IIh . cur.e 10 Ih. rlgl h,.lnll
chord ba.rlnll 01 Norlh
5'2g'411" Ea.I, . r.dlu. o'
1137.02 1..,. . c.nlr.' .ngl.
I 11"53'58" .nd.n orc I.nlllh
I 282.S5 1..1 10 . polnl:
IInc. norlh 12"02'41" h.l,
dlal.nc. 01 1115.72 1111;
IInc. Norlh 0'3"11" Ea.I. .
"I.nc. 01 3gll.70 1..1:
,enc. Norlh S9'12'31" EIII,
dl.lanc. 01 413.21 1..,;
I.nc. Soulh 88'22'58" EIII,
dl.l.nc. 01 1349.70 1..1 10
point on the W..t right o'
.Y IIn. 01 Ih. Se.bo.rd
o.sUln. Railroad: thine.
oulli oJIJI'I1"-Eiil IlIIng
II W..I rlthl 01 WI' In. 01
hi Ret"o"', , tll.lane. 01 ,
101.01 f..t 10. polnl on ....
Inl"ln. o' N. W, land A...
UI Ih''''. N.,1It ....,."..
'101. 1I1o"r. .111 .."'ItME ..
'W, ,INI ""III..... ion..
I, ... ..11 Ih_. oulh
.. '.... ..... " tII...o.. 01
1011... 1..11 I".n.. loulh
,'"..".. e..I. . dl.l.n08 01 '
1lI.1t '.01 10 . polnl on Ih. I
'..1 rlllhl 01 w., 01 Ih. ....
oerd Co""ln. ".Ilro.d:
..nee wllh . b..rlnll 01 Soulh
4"08'23" Will, .Ionll Ih.
'..I rlghl 01 w., 01 Ih. r.11-
I.d, . dl.lance 01 1312.411
III: Ih.nce Soulh 0'33'53"
..1. . dl.l.nc. 01 28.89 1..1; I
IInce Soull> 13"15'22" Will.
dl.l.nc. 01 1120.57 1111:
.enee North 88"50'04" We.l,
dlatance 0' 187.60 f..ti
line. wllh . be.rlnll Norlh
'49'21" Will, . dl.l.nce 01
00.00 1..1: Ih.nce Norlh
8050'04" W..I, . dl.'.nc. 01
18.00 1..1: Ihenc. Soulh
'49'21" Enl, . dl.l.nc. 01
56.84 ,..1: Ihanca Norlh
8"50'04" Will. . dlel.nc. 01
S 17.26 1..1 10 e polnl on Ih.
enterlln. 01 the above de--
crlbed centerline 0' the E.4
anal; thence with . bearing
I Norlh 5'18'14" Will. . die.
Ince 01 153.13 leel, Ih.nc.
'lIh . cur.a 10 Ih. rlghl h..-
19 .. r.dlu. 01 450.00 1..1. .
.nlrol .n9la 01 15"36'44",
nd .n .rc I.nglh 01 122.82
..I: Ih.nc. Norlh 10'18'30" I
.." . dl.l.nc. 01 1188.80
.., 10 . point 0' curvej
,.nc. with. curve to the len
..Inll . "diu. 01 450.00 1..1
cenlral .ngl. 01 18"20'00".
nd .n .rc I.nlllh 01 143.09
..t: thence with. b..rlng of
lorlh 8'01'30" Wltl, . dl.-
.nc. 01 1255.14 1..1 10 .
olnl on Ih. c.nlorlln. 01 N.W.
2nd Avef1uej thence wllh .
.orlng 01 Soulh 89"04'32"
fill, .Iong Ih. canlorlln. 01
I.W 22nd lI.anu. . dl.I.nc.
,I 817 ,85 I.el mora or I... 10
h. Polnl 01 B'9Innln9.
:onl.lnlng 5111.55 .c... mo..
.r I... 10 Ih. Polnl 01 Be9ln-
Ing.
:onl8lnlo9 591.55 acr.. more
-, I... Brtd lublect to .....
,antA and right. of way of re-
ord. I
,91.55 AC GROSS LIIND AREA
IF QUANTUM PIIRK
1.10 AC LESS ROADWAY I
:ANAL RIGHTS.OF.WAY OF
IECORD
i39.85 AC NET LAND AREA
IF OUANTUM PARK
09.lh.. wllh Ih. .ddlllon 01-'
,It I.nd (101. 80, 81 .nd 82)
,Ing within Ih. pl.1 01 Ih. \'
'.C.O. Center containing
13.17 acr.,. IS recorded In ;
'leI Book 80. P.II" 106 .nd :
107 01 Ih. Public R.cord. 01
'.Im Bllch Counl" Florid..
or . 10101 propo..d n'l land
.... 01 553.02 .cr...
'ROPOSED CHANGES: 1) In.
:orpor.llon 01 Ih. unda.a~
)p.d P .C.D.. C.nlor prop.rl,
.101. 80. 81 .nd B21. conl.ln-
n9 13.11 ecrn. .1 Ih. ,olllh-
..., co.ner of Park Rid'll. Bou-
avard _nd Galeway Boul.ve,d
Ind a change 10 the ma.ter
llan de.lgnatlan 'rom o.nce
,.. to Indu.trlel/eommerclal
....;
21 Chenll' In Ih. m..ler pl.n ,
d"'gn.llon ql '01. 58. 59, 80
."d e 1 'rom commercl.1 u..
10 Indu.trl.I"....rch .nd d.-
v.loDment/offlce U'.i
3) Ch.nll' In Ih. m..lor pl.n
d..lgn.llon 01 101. 85A. 85B.
88. 8711. 87B, 87C .nd 91
from oltlcel holel Ule to oW-
ce . hole" commercial u.e:
4) Ch.ng. In Ih. m..ler pl.n
dewlgnatlon o. lot. 83. 84, .nd
85 trom oUlce u.e. to ottlc..
Icommerclal u..:
5) Ch.ng. In Ih. mlllor pl.n
d..lgn.llon 01 101. 8eA .nd
688 'rom r..earch and devel-
opment to r....rch Bnd d.ve-
lopment/com,nerc..' u..: and
8) Change In the "'a.ter plan
d..llln.llol1 .,101. 81, 70 72
71. 71. 77, 78. 711. u. '7:1'\
ond U' IrDm 10ll..elrl.1 10 In-
du.trl.lIco",merol.'ulI.
APPLICANT, Ou.nlum A....
cl.I..
AOENTl ".m.. G. Wln"d, ...
qulr.
Shull. a low.n
AI Inl....I... p.rlle. .r. nolI-
lied 10 .ppe.. .1 ..Id h..rlnl
In p.r.on or b, .1I0rn., .nd
b. h.ard. An, peroon who d..
cld.. I. .pp..1 .n, d.cl.lon
01 lho CII, Comml"'on wlllt
r..pecl 10 .n, m.ller con.ld-
.red .t till. m..\lnll will n..d
. r.cord 01 Ih. prOClldln".
.nd lor .uch prupo.. m.,
".ed 10 en.ur. Ih.1 . ...b.lI",
..cord 01 Ihe proc..dlnll' I.
m.d., which ..cord Includ..
lho I..Umon, .nd ..Idenc.
upon which th. .pp..II. 10 ba
b...d.
CITY OF 1I0YNTON IlEACH
SUZANNe Y. KRuse
CYC/ AAE .
CITY CLERK
(407) 378,8081
PUB: Th. P.lm lI..ch PO'I
Jun. 17. ll1N
.....
, -
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 11,1996
Chairman Dube advised Ms Heyden that the parking lot on the corner of Seacrest
Boulevard and SE 23rd has never been sodded Mr Aguila advised that a very small
portion was sodded and is now dead on SE 23rd Handicap spaces were provided in that
lot, but there IS no way to get from hard surface to hard surface without going through the
dead grass Ms Heyden advised that she would follow up on thIs situation
6, OLD BUSINESS
None
7 NEW BUSINESS
A. PUBLIC HEARING
Land Use Element Amendment/Rezonina
1
Project Name
Agent'
Owner'
Location
Description
Quantum Park PID/PCD Center
James G Willard, Esquire
Quantum Associates
13 93 acres of property at the southwest corner
of 1-95 and Gateway Boulevard
Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Map from Office Commercial to
Industrial and rezone from Planned Commercial
Development (PCD) to Planned Industrial
Development (PID) to add into the Quantum
Park PID
Mike Rumpf, Senior Planner, made a brief presentation Law stipulates that property
adjacent to a DRI, owned by the same entity operating the DRI, must be incorporated as
part of the DRI This particular circumstance was noted during the last amendment to the
DRI This is the first step in amending the master plan and the Future Land Use Map and
rezoning the property The use approval will be reviewed tonight, and the master plan will
be reviewed at the next meeting
Jim Willard. Attornev for Quantum Associates. advised that the applicant has no
comments to add to staff's recommendation These three particular lots were left out of
the original DRI approval The lots are platted and enjoy the same infrastructure as the
remainder of the DRI This would change the zoning to be consistent with the zoning in
the rest of Quantum Park, and would make these lots consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan Within two weeks, these lots will be added to the DRI as part of a Notification of
Change to the DRI
3
MEETING MINUTeS
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JUNE 11,1996
In response to Chairman Dube's question, Mr Willard advised that the applicant has no
objections to the two conditions of approval noted in Exhibit "0"
CHAIRMAN DUBE ANNOUNCED THE PUBLIC HEARING THERE WAS NO ONE
PRESENT WHO WISHED TO SPEAK ON THIS PETITION
Motion
Mr Wische moved to approve the request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land
Use Map from Office Commercial to Industrial and rezone from Planned Commercial
Development (PCD) to Planned Industrial Development (PID) to add into the Quantum
Park PID, subject to staff comments Mr Aguila seconded the motion
Mr Aguila questioned how this change would affect the COD Mr Willard advised that the
legal description of the land that was put into the COD were the platted lots that were
customarily known as Quantum, and marketed as such These three lots were included
Therefore, nothing will change because they were already part of that legal description
The motion carried unanimously
Use ADDroval
Description
Quantum Park PIO
James Willard
Quantum Associates
West side of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and
High Ridge Road
Request to amend the list of permitted uses for the
Quantum Corporate Park PID to allow used car sales
on industrially-designated lots within the PID
2
Project
Agent
Owner'
Location
At the boardrs request, no presentation was made by staff
Mr Aguila confInned with Ms, Heyden that the purpose of this request is to allow the use
in Quantum Park, and not to approve the site plan However, Ms, Heyden explained that
site conditions have been added because she feels that waiting until the site plan stage
would be too late
Mr Aguila was of the opinion that any auto dealership in the City of Boynton Beach should
be a conditional use because each one needs to be evaluated on its own merit, and so that
conditions can be added for aesthetics, beautification and buffering from neighbors, In
looking at the site plan that was included as part of the back-up material, Mr Aguila felt
that he was looking at a "sea of asphalt" Even reviewing the brochure which was included
4
ORDINANCE NO 96-J,g 1UUl
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNT N
BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
DETERMINATION THAT CHANGES TO THE
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL
IMPACT APPROVED IN ORDINANCE NO 84-51,
AND AMENDED IN ORDINANCES NOS 86-11, 86-
3 7 , 88- 3 , 9 4 - 10 AND 94 - 5 1 , DO NOT
CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION UNDER
CHAPTER 380 06, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1996,
DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW IS NECESSARY
REGARDING SUCH CHANGES, APPROVING SUCH
CHANGES, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER
(ORDINANCE NOS 84-51, 86-11, 86-37, 88-
3, 94-10 AND 94-51) FOR PURPOSES OF
INCORPORATING THE APPROVED CHANGES, AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
Ill' 2 4
vl"\
-~----'
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
WHEREAS, Riteco Development Corporation, a Florida
corporation ("Riteco") filed with the City of Boynton Beach
(the "City") an Application for Development Approval of
Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact (the "ADA") on
May 21, 1984, regarding that certain property (the "Property")
described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part
hereof; and
WHEREAS, the ADA was approved and the Development Order
for the Property was granted December 18, 1984 and pursuant to
Ordinance No 84-51 (the "Development Order"); and
WHEREAS, Riteco subsequently conveyed its right, titles
and interest in and to the Property to Boynton Park of
Commerce, Inc , a Florida corporation ("Boynton Park"), and,
Boynton Park, in turn, subsequently conveyed its right, title
and interest in and to the Property to Quantum Associates, a
Florida general partnership (the "Developer") and
WHEREAS, Developer filed with the City respective
which
applications
amend
the
Development
Order,
to
applications were approved by the City in Ordinance No 86-11,
Ordinance No 86-37, Ordinance No 88-3, Ordinance No 94-10,
and Ordinance 94-51; and
WHEREAS, the term "Development Order" includes all
amendments thereto and
WHEREAS,
Associates,
Florida
Quantum
a
general
partnership ("Developer") is the current owner and develope1o
of the remaining vacant land within the project commonly knovJn
as Quantum Corporate Park at Boynton Beach Development of
Regional Impact (sometimes hereinafter called the "Quantum
i Park DRI"), and
WHEREAS, Developer has submitted to the City a
Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved
Development of Regional Impact ("NOPC") requesting a further
amendment to the Development Order for the purpose of revising
the Master Site Development Plan to reflect the addition of
Lots 80, 81 and 82 to the DRI and to include commercial use as
a permitted land use for certain additional lots (lots 65A,
65B, 67B, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 91) within Quantum Park and
delete commercial use as a permitted land use for lots 58, 59,
60, 61 and 62 within Quantum Park (see attached Exhibit "B" -
Amended Master Site Development Plan); and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of Boynton Beach, as the
governing body having jurisdiction, is authorized and
empowered to consider applications for amendments to
development orders approving developments of regional impact
pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996); and
WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered the
testimony, reports and other documentary evidence submitted at
said public hearing by Developer, the City staff and the
public, and the City Planning and Development Boardrs
recommendations of the 25th day of June, 1996; and
WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered all of the
foregoing
NOW THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Commission of
Boynton Beach, that said City Commission makes the following
findings of fact
Section 1 A notice of public hearing in the proceedings
was duly published on the 17th day of June, 1996, in The Post,
a newspaper of general circulation in Boynton Beach, Florida,
pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes, and proof of
said publication has been duly filed in these proceedings
-2-
i
'i
:
I
I,
I
Section 2
Developer has requested that the Development
Order be amended to include the following provisions
1 Lots 80, 81 and 82 as per the plat of P C D
Center, Plat Book 60, Pages 106 and 107, Public
Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, are hereby
added and incorporated into the Quantum Park DRI
2 Master Plan Amendment No 6 to the Master Site
Development Plan for Quantum Park dated July 1,
1996, is hereby approved
3 In accordance with the analysis of the intersection
of Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard prepared
by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc dated April 9,
1996, as modified by supplemental Analysis dated
June 10, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference,
the following intersection improvements shall be
constructed at such time as that portion of the
project served by Park Ridge Road exceeds the
following trip generation levels
a 1,200 P m peak hour trips - restripe the
southbound approach for dual lefts and a
combination through/right turn lane
b 1,300 P m peak hour trips - construct an
additional right-turn lane on the northbound
approach to provide dual right-turns
c 1,935 P m peak hour trips - add a southbound
through
lane
and
out
the
separate
through/right into a through and right-turn
only lane
The Developer shall not proceed with development of
that portion of the project served by Park Ridge
Boulevard which would generate in excess of 2,300
p m peak hour trips without further review of the
operating characteristics of said intersection and
approval by the City, the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council and the Department of Community
Affairs
-3-
'.
!I
,
,
4 Concurrently with the submittal of a site plan
application for any lot designated commercial
pursuant to the Master Site Development Plan
(regardless of whether the proposed use is
commercial or another permitted land use), the
applicant shall indicate in writing to the City the
number of PM peak hour vehicle trips estimated to
be generated by the proposed building improvement
and also the aggregate peak hour trip generation
for all lots served by Park Ridge Boulevard
5 Wi th respect to any commercial development along
Gateway Boulevard, the following conditions shall
apply
a There shall be no increase in the number of
free- standing signs than is currently
permitted (i e one per loti additional lots
created beyond the number of lots that
currently exists as of the adoption date of
this ordinance shall not be entitled to their
own
freestanding
sign
and
share
must
freestanding signage with an adjacent lot)
b There shall be no increase in the number of
access points on to Gateway Boulevard than
currently anticipated (i e
addi tional lots
created beyond the number of lots that
currently exists as of the adoption date of
this ordinance shall not be entitled to their
own access point and must share access through
cross access with an adjacent lot)
c Landscaping shall be installed in excess of
that required by the landscaping code in
effect as of the adoption date of this
ordinance
The extent of the supplemental
landscaping required shall be determined at
the time of sit~ plan review for the first
commercial
along
Boulevard
lot
Gateway
-4-
submitted for review after the adoption date
of this ordinance The supplemental
landscaping determined to be required for this
first commercial lot shall establish the
landscaping standard required for subsequent
commercial lots along Gateway Boulevard
6 Where square footage is used to evaluate traffic
generated by a given land use, gross floor area
shall be used, with the exception of commercial use
which shall be evaluated using gross leasable area
7 The sewage lift station serving Park Ridge
Boulevard shall be upgraded at Quantum's expense at
such time as development generates sewer flow in
excess of the lift station capacity as determined
by the city's Utilities Department
Section 3 Upon consideration of all matters described
in Section 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996), it is hereby
determined that
A The amendments proposed by Developer do not
unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the
objectives of the adopted state land development plan
applicable to this area
B The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent
with the local comprehensive plan and local land
development regulations
C The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent
with the recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council on file in these proceedings
D The amendments proposed by Developer do not
constitute a substantial deviation under Chapter 380 06,
Florida Statutes (1996)
Section 4 The City Commission has concluded as a matter
of law that these proceedings have been duly conducted
pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes
(1996), that Developer is entitled to the relief prayed and
applied for, and that the Development Order is hereby amended
-5-
[i
';
I
, incorporating the amendments proposed by Developer as set
forth in Section 2 above
Section 5
Except as otherwise amended herein, the
Development Order shall remain in full force and effect
FIRST READING this 2nd day of July, 1996
SECOND READING and FINAL PASSAGE this
/~
day of
~~~
, 1996
I ATTEST
~\~
COMMISSIONER
~
I~
'~ ~
Ii ~~
: CI CLERK
I
I (Corporate Seal)
, EXHIBITS
"A" - Legal Description
"B" - Amended Master Site Development Plan
-6-
EXHIBIT "A"
() tJb / 33
-
-
OVERALL BOUNDARY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A Tract of land lying partiall, in 'eetion. II, 17, 30 and 21,
Township 41 SouCh, Ran,e 4' .a.t, 'al. aeach County, florida,
laid Tract being .o~e particularlr delo~Sb.d .. '0110w..
Co...natn, .. ~h. 8outhwe.e Gorner of ..id .ection 11; thence
North 1....39" last, along the "est line of Section 11, a
distance 01 1311.10 feet to a point in the incerlection with the
centerline 01 N,N, 22nd Avenue, a. recorded in O,R. Book 1138r
Page 11.1, 01 tbe .ublic Recordl 01 'ala aeacb county, florid.;
thence with a bearing of Nortb 89.0.'32" lalt, along the
centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue, a dietance of 118.31 feet to the
Point of Beginning; thence North 1..4'39. laet, a diltance of
1241,06 feet to the South right of way line of L.W.D.D. Lateral
21; thence North 89008'49" last along the South right of way
line L.W.D.D. Lateral 21, al recorded in O.R. Book 1732, Page
612, of the Public Records of pal81 Beach county, Florida, a
distance of 635.93 feet to the centerline of the L W D 0
Equalizing Canal 1-4, as recorded in O.R. Book 1132, Pag~ 612,
of the Public Records of pal81 seach county, Florida; thence
along the centerline of the above described B-4 canal with a
curve to the ri9ht havin9 a chord be.ring of North 10032'52"
Baat, a radius of 750.00 feet, a central angle of 4004'17", and
an arc length of 53.29 feet, thence continue along the
centerline of the 1-. canal, w1th a bearing of North 12035'00"
East, a di.tance of 320.69 feet to a point of curve; thence ~1th
a curve to the left having a radius of 6500.00, a central angle
of 3028 130", and an arc length of 39..23 feet; thence North
9006' 30" Bast, a distance of 1919.16 feet to a point on the
tlorth Line of Section 11; thence with a bearing of North
89016'39" Bast, along the North line of Section 11, a distance
of 1964.50 feet; thence South 0002' II" Bast, a distance 0 f
2625.18 f.et; thence North 890081.9" Bast, a distance of 368 96
.feet to a point on the North right of way line of N W 22nd
Avenue .s recorded in O.R. Book 1738, .ave 1686 of the Public
IRecord. of Pal. .each County, Florida, thence South 19027'31"
~ast, a diltance of 50 00 feet to the centerl1ne of N M 22nd
Avenue, tbence "lith a curve to the right hav1nv a chord bearing
of North 75.29' .9" Bait, a rad1us of 1631. 02 feet, a central
angle of '.53'58", and an arc length of 282.85 feet to a point,
thence north 12002'41" Bast, ~ d1stance of 915.72 feet; thence
North 0031'11" East, a distance of 399.70 feet: thence North
89012'37" Bast, a distance of 413.21 feet;then South 88022'56"
East, a d1stance of 1349 70 feet to a point on the West right of
way 11ne of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad; thence south
0028'21" Bast, along the West right of way line of the Railroad,
a distance of 1309.09 feet to a point on the centerline of N W
22nd Avenue, thence North 88027'31" We.t, .10ng the centerline
of N.W. 22nd Avenue a di.tance of 1572.'7 f.et, thence South
0033153" Bast, a distanc. of 1306.69 feet, thence South
88045'31" last, a diltance of 333.51 feet to a point on the West
right of way of the s.aboard co..tline Railroad; tbence with a
bear1ng of Soutb 14008'23" West, along the Weet r1ght of way of
the railroad, a distance of 1312.4' feet, thence south 0033'53"
East, a distance of 26.69 feet; thence South 13.15'22" West, .
diltanc. of '20,11 feet, thence North e'-50'O'. We.t, a distance
of 181.60 feet, thence with a bearing North 0049'21" West, a
d18tp.nce of 200.00 feet; thence North 88.50'04" West, a distance
of 218 00 feet; thence South 0049121" East, a distance of 200 00
feet; thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 40 00 feet;
thence South 0049'21" Bast, a dis~ance of 556 84 feet; thence
North 88050'04" West, a distance of 3617.26 feet to a point on
the centerline of the above described centerline of the E-4
Canal; thenc. with a bearing of North ~01"14" W.st, a distance
of 153 13 feet, thence with a curve to th. r19ht having a radius
of 450.00 feet, a central angle of 15036'4.", and an arc length
---------------
II
I.
ILEGAL DESCRIPTION I Continued I
I!of 122.62 .feet; thence North 10018'30" Ea.t, a di.tance of
,988.&0 f..-C to a point of curv., thence with. curve to the 1.
IlhaVing a radiu. of.fIO.OO f.et, . cencral antl. of l'.20'O~
and an are length of 143." feet, thence with a b.aring of North
18001' 30" We.c, a distance of 1255.1t f..t to a point on the
Ilcenterline of N.W. 22nd Avenu., thence with a bearing of South
;,89004' 32" We.t, alon9 the c.nt.rline of N.W. 22nd Avenue a
Ildi.tance of 817.85 f..t .ore or 1e.. to thl Point of Beginning
cont.ining 591.55 acr.. aore or 1e.. and .ubject to ......nts
and right. of way of r.cord.
\.
EXHIBIT "B"
"
!
t,."".~ ~.....~_
,
j
.1
I
I
l
...
&:J
ii
17 .."
r
S
G
~
51
Q~
~<
W~
IlJO
EE
-
I
--, ~
, '! t
l
-
;--
j
- ..,
, i
....;..
I
I
ii.
~--
..
....:
.1J
\\
-r:.
. ~ -.,'~. ...;=..~. ::_~=-- - :.-
:1..
.
..,..
!..
.....
...
'''In'
......
L...... __ _ ....
'JII
:=
WASTER "LAN ....ENOWENT NO. .
JULY 11, 18.
I IMI...... 01 ,,. ... ..... 1a . ~ AI roC
,. . 'nC ... ICMOII. ~ . ~ WIllI
- _IODI' NO. . .. "/\l1M.
I Dl'CUIPIIht fJII we I'CIWaMI UItG ~ ~ ..,.0 NIX DCIID ....
..... ........ ...... ..... CII"f' ~
---~.. It LJI6.JN _n eRa......
~..... . Q.UI) _H'- . " __ MIA. ... YO IIICID
... . '--'712 . " ClOD ....
.. ..... _ . _ . " _ ... CIDMIIICIIL
a. ..... CIID ... .. .. ......,. .... __ IS._ ...
~ ~~-=":::r=.='.=...-..a..... _.
_.
II APPROveD COMMERCfAt
IIIllI DELETION OF COMMERCIA
MASTER
SITE
DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
LEGEND
~--LJ 'I'
'!'
i
(:)
0"_ 81.12 ......
orrICo/CommercIal 1.57 "'crn
Ollie./Ha'./Commora.l 13.15 "cr..
Ollie'/Hal. 11.57 "cr.,
orrlCo/RfcD 1.03 "Ctn
OIIlce/GId 2.31 .....n
Indultrlol/Comm_ 21.55 ........
Indloltriol/RMl/OIllca 23.111 "'cr..
Indu,'r"l 115.35 "cr..
R&:D 32.11 "cr..
R&:O/CId 2.40 "crn
Cavornmonlol/ln'"luUonol 311.110 "cr..
WotlOndl 1.00 "ern
Sand Pine R.....w 40.00 Acr..
Raacla 41.13 .......
OPEN SP"CE ~ ICU7 "crn
Perk.
L.....
Oettntlort
I.'" ,
KEY PLAN
QUANTUM ASSOCIATES
Nollonal Clly Center
115 Wesl Washlnglon SI.
Indlonapolls, IN 46204
(317) 636-1600
QUANTUM PARK
Tor At
~53.1.3 Acr..
REQUEST FOR PUBLISHING
LEGAL NOTICES AND/OR LEGAL ADVERTISEMENTS
A completed copy of this routing slip must accompany any request
to have a Legal Notice or Legal Advertisement published and must
be submitted to the Office of the City Attorney eight (8) working
days prior to the first publishing date requested below
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT
Planninq and Zoninq Department
PREPARED BY Tambri J, Hevden DATE PREPARED June 13, 1996
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NOTICE OR AD Ouantum Park notice of
proposed chanqe to the DRI development order to add the PCD
Center property and chanqe the master plan land use desiqnation
of lots 58, 59, 60, 61, 65A, 65B, 66, 67A, 67B, 67C, 68A, 68B,
69, 70, 72, 73A, 73B, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83,
84, 85 and 91,
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS (Size of Headline, Type
Size, Section Placement, Black Border, etc )
Pursuant to Chapter 380,06 (19) (f) of Florida Statues, there
appears to be no special requirements,
SEND COPIES OF AD TO Planninq & Zoninq Dept, , Quantum
Associates, Aqent, James G, Willard, Newspaper, City Attornev
NEWSPAPER(S) TO PUBLISH The Post (newspaper of qeneral
circulation). since this is a prolect of reqional im?act, rather
than the Bovnton Beach News,
DATE(S) TO BE PUBLISHED Minimum once, 15 days prior to public
hearinq date of Julv 2, 1996, i,e, June 17, 1996,
APPROVED BY
(1)
~ f ~ 1
d tf-n-ll).-1,t. -t1 tU--.J
/
(Department Head)
6;;1/1[,
(Date)
(2)
(City Attorney) (Date)
(3) 6/aJe-- itjv/9(,;
(City Manager) (Date)
RECEIVED BY CITY CLERK
COMPLETED
a legalnot QUA
Quantum Park - Notice of Public Hearing
Page 1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that City Commission of THE CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, will conduct a Public Hearing at 7 00
P M or as soon thereafter as the agenda permits on Tuesday, July
2, 1996, in the City Hall Commission Chambers, 100 East Boynton
Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida The purpose of this
public hearing is for consideration of a proposed change to the
Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Development Order (Ordinance No
84-51) as amended by Ordinances Nos 86-11, 86-37 and 88-3, 94-10
and 94-51 and determination as to whether or not the proposed
change constitutes a substantial deviation to the approved
development order with respect to the following described
property located within the corporate limits of said City,
pursuant to the request of the parties in interest and in
compliance with Chapter 380, Florida Statutes
REQUEST
QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH DRI
Formerly Boynton Beach Park of Commerce
Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A Tract of land lying partially in Sections 16,
17, 20 and 21, Township 45 South, Range 43 East,
Palm Beach County, Florida, said Tract being more
particularly described as follows Commencing at
the Southwest corner of said Section 17, thence
North 1044'3911 East, along the West line of
Section 17, a distance of 1318 10 feet to a point
in the intersection with the centerline of N W
22nd Avenue, as recorded in 0 R Book 1738, Page
1686, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida, thence with a bearing of North 89004'3211
East, along the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, a
distance of 778 37 feet to the Point of Beginning,
thence North 1044'3911 East, a distance of 1247 06
feet to the South right of way line of L W D D
Lateral 21, thence North 89008'4911 East along the
South right of way line L W D D Lateral 21, as
recorded in 0 R Book 1732, Page 612, of the
Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, a
distance of 635 93 feet to the centerline of the
L W D D Equalizing Canal E-4, as recorded in 0 R
Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public Records of Palm
Beach County, Florida; thence along the
centerline of the above described E-4 Canal with
a curve to the right having a chord bearing of
North 10032'5211 East, a radius of 750 00 feet, a
central angle of 4004'1711, and an arc length of
53 29 feet, thence continue along the centerline
of the E-4 Canal, with a bearing of North
12035'0011 East, a distance of 320 69 feet to a
point of curve, thence with a curve to the left
having a radius of 6500 00, a central angle of
3028'3011, and an arc length of 394 23 feet, thence
North 9006'3011 East, a distance of 1979 16 feet to
a point on the North Line of Section 17, thence
with a bearing of North 89016'3911 East, along the
North line of Section 17, a distance of 1964 50
feet, thence South 0002'1111 East, a distance of
2625 18 feet, thence North 89008'4911 East, a
distance of 368 96 feet to a point on the North
right of way line of N W 22nd Avenue as recorded
in 0 R Book 1738, Page 1686 of the Public Records
of Palm Beach County, Florida, thence South
19027'3111 East, a distance of 50 00 feet to the
centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, thence with a
curve to the right having a chord bearing of
Quantum Park - Notice of Public Hearing
Page 2
North 75029'49" East, a radius of 1637 02 feet, a
central angle of 9053'58", and an arc length of
282 85 feet to a point; thence north 12002'41"
East, a distance of 915 72 feet, thence North
0031'11" East, a distance of 399 70 feet; thence
North 89012'37" East, a distance of 413 21 feet,
thence South 88022'56" East, a distance of 1349 70
feet to a point on the West right of way line of
the Seaboard Coastline Railroad, thence South
0028'21" East, along the West right of way line of
the Railroad, a distance of 1309 09 feet to a
point on the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue,
thence North 88027'31" West, along the centerline
of N W 22nd Avenue a distance of 672 97 feet,
thence South 0033'53" East, a distance of 1306 69
feet; thence South 88045'31" East, a distance of
333 51 feet to a point on the West right of way of
the Seaboard Coastline Railroad, thence with a
bearing of South 14008'23" West, along the West
right of way of the railroad, a distance of
1312 49 feet, thence South 0033'53" East, a
distance of 26 69 feet, thence South 13015'22"
West, a distance of 920 57 feet, thence North
88050'04" West, a distance of 187 60 feet, thence
with a bearing North 0049'21" West, a distance of
200 00 feet, thence North 88050'04" West, a
distance of 218 00 feet; thence South 0049'21"
East, a distance of 200 00 feet, thence North
88050'04" West, a distance of 40 00 feet, thence
South 0049'21" East, a distance of 556 84 feet,
thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 3617 26
feet to a point on the centerline of the above
described centerline of the E-4 Canal; thence
with a bearing of North 5018'14" West, a distance
of 153 13 feet, thence with a curve to the right
having a radius of 450 00 feet, a central angle of
15036'44", and an arc length of 122 62 feet,
thence North 10018'30" East, a distance of 988 60
feet to a point of curve; thence with a curve to
the left having a radius of 450 00 feet, a central
angle of 18020'00", and an arc length of 143 99
feet, thence with a bearing of North 8001'30"
West, a distance of 1255 14 feet to a point on the
centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, thence with a
bearing of South 89004'32" West, along the
centerline of N W 22nd Avenue a distance of
817 85 feet more or less to the Point of
Beginning
Containing 591 55 acres more or less and subject
to easements and rights of way of record
591 55 AC
51 70 AC
GROSS LAND AREA OF QUANTUM PARK
LESS ROADWAY & CANAL
RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD
NET LAND AREA OF QUANTUM PARK
539 85 AC
Together with the addition of all land (lots 80,
81 and 82) lying within the plat of the P C D
Center, containing 13 17 acres, as recorded in
Plat Book 60, Pages 106 and 107, of the Public
Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, for a total
proposed net land area of 553 02 acres
PROPOSED
CHANGES 1 )
Incorporation of the undeveloped P C D
Center property (lots 80, 81 and 82),
containing 13 17 acres at the southeast
corner of Park Ridge Boulevard and Gateway
Quantum Park - Notice of Public Hearing
Page 3
Boulevard and a change to the master plan
designation from office use to
industrial/commercial use,
2) Change in the master plan designation of lots
58, 59, 60 and 61 from commercial use to
industrial/research and development/office
use,
3) Change in the master plan designation of lots
65A, 65B, 66, 67A, 67B, 67C and 91 from
office/hotel use to office/hotel/commercial
use,
4) Change ln the master plan designation of lots
83, 84 and 85 from office use to
office/commerical use,
5) Change in the master plan designation of lots
68A and 68B from research and development to
research and development/commercial use, and
6) Change in the master plan designation of
lots 69, 70, 72, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73A
and 73B from industrial to
industrial/commercial use
APPLICANT
Quantum Associates
AGENT:
James G Willard, Esquire
Shutts & Bowen
All interested parties are notified to appear at said hearing in
person or by attorney and be heard Any person who decides to
appeal any decision of the City Commission with respect to any
matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the
proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes
the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
SUZANNE M KRUSE, CMC/AAE
CITY CLERK
(407) 375-6062
a legalnot QUA
MEETING MINU ;
PLANNING It DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
AUGUST 13, 1996
Motion
Vice Chairman Golden moved to approve the request to abandon the eastern portion of the cul-de-
sac located at the northern terminus of Kepner Drive (a.k.a. S E. 7th Street) subject to staff
comments. Mr Aguila seconded the motion which carried unanimously
8. COMMENTS BY MEMBERS
Vice Chairman Golden advised that the DCA has decided to appeal the City's decision on Quantum
Park. At Chairman Dube's request, Ms. Heyden advised that this subject deals with the DRI
amendment that came before the board approximately two months ago for adding additional
commercial lots at Quantum Park and relocating the parcels already designated for commercial
The City Commission decided that they did not want the flexibility of commercial and required the
applicant to designate the number of commercial acres The applicant turned in a master plan
showing that and included a note that precluded Treasure Coast and the DCA from ever looking at
the master modification again Their note was not worded correctly DCA has 45 days after we
adopt a Development Order to appeal They want the note removed from the plan. Therefore, they
are appealing. Ms. Heyden has not had an opportuni,ty-to talk with Quantum Park representatives
about removing the note She is hopeful they will remove the note and that will end the issue.
9, ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the board, the meeting properly adjourned at 8 14
p.m
f}:;:; ~i!~
Recording Secretary
(Two Tapes)
AuguS114. 1996
10