The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS .:t..:;r-~....... ~# r-- I \ :: ,- I I e '--- :J I ., ,] l I; ~ ~ I !' "'~I='= .1.; - :.:.: I ~ : ~~ ,1 :/1; -~ .!1 ii . . ::: lIP. . ~. 17 1....., ~ _=~ _a_j -==- '*' '='=' " . -- .-.: .' t ;; ___~..u_ .__ - - -- ._- ~ - I , . - -- I, t' ~ -~ , , I' \, --, r 11 ;..,,-., I' I i 1 - n . ..".,.... II .1:: ~ ~ - ~.. - .., .. . "'.1 - - . "'='I' ~/;~:" ;!i:'- .. .. ~~ -ft - - -- ,L.W.D.D. EOUALWNG CAHAI. C-I' ~~ = ..... MASTER PlAN AMENDMENT NO. 6 JULY 1 1996 """JIIOIrIIC:IIIrJII.....IIIICl.~ 'IOKWlICA1IDaT11€ ....1Jf11€t<<:MKIG1.~.oIICCClIDIM:('MtM 0Rl ........ 110 . IWtD ./1./M 1 DE\'O.~ t1f 1K ~ LAND US[ a.AS:Sn:an::lNS SH:ll.A.O Jrl)T [ttrm TH[" f~ IM'DISm[$ ~ FUII'fHEJI C/I"l' ~ CO~ (M1.~ JlI II: D) Z-7M.>>t SO " CtIOSS n..oCJIt .lIMA :~ (1fII:Ll8IC MOTU II: CUll) ca.- sa " GItOSS ~ MlA. 11m '0 DCUD '7 1DUL CIlES. '='"U l.ee.m sa " CII09 FlOOR..... 0III(1'OfEl1IDCItI 2MSQ""GIOSSI.ViISAIlI.IIltA~ .J 'ftnIIL'C'STtOlJlPSFaltWPWO.aCl'$MIU._U~JI1f. ~CTS .,... DC ~ tlDJGNA:rm fat ~ t.-o US[ ....r BE (.....c;u:,~., ~ Of" THE an' ~ 'MfHOUT f'tIlmCJIl DIll Il[\II[1II CfI' -- f MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGfND h,.....-L'tJ 'l' (.nEI') T KEY PLAN O!f;ee Office,/Cwtm..ciOl Offoc:e.......I/Commerc;oI OfflCe/llllol OfflCO/IIIIl Off;ceJ~ InduetriollCommerckll InduslriallR-til/Office Industrilll R-til R-til/GIlI Govem~ftnstitutionol Wetlandl Sand Pine Reserve ROO<Is 98.62 .Acres 6.57 Aer.. 13.65 Aern 11.57 Acr.. 6.03 Acres 2.39 Aeres 26.55 Acre. 23.19 Acres 115.35 Acr.. 32.11 Acres 2.40 Acres 36.90 Acres 6.00 Acres 40.00 Acres 41.13 Acres QUANTUM ASSOCIATES National City Center 115 West Washington St Indianopolis. IN 46204 (317) 636-1600 o OPEN SPCE ~ 90.67 Acres P.... Lakes Detent. QUANTUM PARK ~~r- 1Bl~ :~"'\D .- ..:---~'~.. ~j~- ~~~~ - TOTAl 553.13 Aco-", .- r.~~. . '"""!'1' ".~ _-.:-r.,,"_ ~_::: EXHIBIT "B" r--- J l;1 I I I ,1 I I l I s i { J :::1l 1 J ---, .. ... J~ ~n ::1 i~ T :I !,.. n Ii ~ 51~ Qj2 ~~ ~5 ~o E~ - I 1; ""i.""'\, ......, , ~ ~ . - -~ ~ a $ l ~ i ~ ~-- . - - - -- -- .. ~ H/ wJ ~ ~ ~= i\ ..,... L1IIf.D.O. IOIMuZINO CANAL c.." UASTEA PLAN AWENOMENT NO. 5 JULY 11. 1996 tMI POll'I'ICN 01 ~ .. ...... 10 . WilQQID 10T T"rfC ,... C6 1M( MQf ICHODL ~ " ~ WIrM 0. ~ 1<<). 4 0Nm ."./9". :z Dl'Vl:J..QPMOrr Of' nc F'Ql..l.OIIlIIG lAM) USl Cl.A!l!IlF1CATIONS ShOll' n I'4OT ElIC:(.to ~E ~ Io;lOCSLlU wrtMOUt RJIm'l[lt CITY ~ IG.lSTAIAl (l~ R .. 0) 2,7...". 50 fT GJIIDS!o ARfA ~ aeJn.1ftCl.UOI'tC HOTU. . CWI) ..'Z.... 50 FT ~ utA ,,:;'1' fa !XCUtI amct: 1.~.772 SO " CItOSS IIt[A 0JriI HOltL ROQI 288 SO ]:T &HeSs ARIA ~ I. TGDI. G1tD TRIPS FOR M PItOolECT SloW.&. lIlbWN .,.752 NJr. <\. U1I'$ wmwt t(4( ~ QDIGIealU ,... ~ tA/IlD ust YAY If CtWt(;[D/RtLOCAT!D In' ~ Of Tl€ em' ~ 'fIlTl4OIJT 'VIUMtll. OR! Rt\1EW QlIt _. APPROVED COMMERCIXt mllI DELETION OF COMMERCIAL MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGEND ~_~W' - - (If NIT) T KEY PLAN Office Offtce/Commerciol Oltice/HoleJ/CommvciQI Office/Hot.. Omce/R&O Omce/G&I Indu,trial/Commercial Indu,tricl/R&O/Olflce IndustriCiI R&O R&O/G&I Go\...rnmental/lnstltutional Wetlo"ds Sand Pine R..erve Rood15 98.62 Acre. e.!;' Acr.. ,3.6!; Aeres 11.!;' Aer.. e.03 AcrlS 2.39 Acr.. 26.55 Acr.. 23.19 ,0.0'11 115.35 ,0.0'.' 32." Acr.. 2.40 Aeroo 36.90 Aer.' 6.00 Aern 40.00 Acr.. .n.13 Acrn QUANTUM ASSOCIATES National City Center 1 '5 West Washington 5t Indianapolis. IN 46204 (317) 636-1600 G 01"(11 SPACE ~ 90.67 Acr.. Park. lak.. Detention QUANTUM PARK TOT AI.. '53.13 _.. ~- ! ~I .c; ..... ~ ..., , i -- ~' oj ... 'L' ... $~ ~~ o :< g Ii. Ot- ,~ ~ t:l g: \! ~~~ Ii: - -----, ^' ~ ~ J~ ~ ~ ~ :,r.............. ::. -0 ~ ., ~ .. , , '-.- " 'l... "- ,,\ ~ l !~ "" '" :::> Q~ l:! , ~.< ~' ; ~~\ ~~. //'A\ Ili , "'-" S'~ "/ '\:' " '-4-~" / - / /~ / / ' ~// . \\\ - - ( ~ ~ ) \ \ .I~: . "" '\ ~:! . I \ -:. I '\ I ! ! ,,\ I i I ; \ \ I)' I /~ --~----\ ~ ;(~ ,,) \ ("""~; // I. I J / \ ...tl\! i \ . -: \! .!;l \_~J L _----1--- I \)) t!~ - I \~ !!~~ I ,\fl~ I I t"j.. ' i~ ~~; I ...~ ' ~:::/~_ - ~~J ---------- g --~'"" -------- ---- - . -- .. ~_ _---- r ---- -c( i~ W f- !~ I ''- :::. n... In {~ _ il~i~ d- g~ -:1; J~ At-\ X III _ V') ~ 1;t: 'D::t: <it +]1- g i - ~ ~ .. ~ ... ~, .. 1 \ . . E ~\! -~ r , j \ __ I ~I \ \ ~WDD E ______, QUilL/ZING ~ 1- -~ - CA"." E~4 ~~l'"l\ ~] ~ 2: ~I~ i (I) pc) C/l ) o t--"" CL <"t:' _0 ~ ~2 ~ ~ C\- CO:r t<\ N _---l .--- -- ... .. ~:" ;z : S-'1&"4 I / , .;./Y- "Pf:/I () , !\ ? \1 u ib et ," J- L~ 4" 1 ? Ii,pf Il'; ~ I I ilyl , tl6<t, 1 '_)~,wPu,;.J2 ~ l_ it! ti D \;A .tIID pI J;z. tJ ~} ,:/'a 163 I f& J.- /33 f .Jt ~ ,J:I 4 it' c:: ...- C' tel.? ti \ "~'- I 4- _ /;1.-5. J- J.rt-" 4+ .~ 34 (rJ< :pf~!,jf) (f j li"'!rt i 3), " I;lCl /J.. ,,4.{...., 70't:c; f' /Y' j,vU. tp ~11 1d-G/ f ~ - -- ----- t'(fd 1<7 +&,~i ,),-'j/Y) ~~f3 \ 4fq, ~3'1 v.vh1l ! s4k 'I \ \ '11 ' C'\'~~ ~IIL c~ (;~ ",,<C "., 30. -I J !? J,4v tfr;:c r......S' -- ..,~< ~ d ,Jot.< ( ~t\'I'('- {JtL [" , .).q '7 ./ (") ,~ /~ t 2' 1F" '~'f '~:1;{/ \ 2f; 'r \ 1 \ "' \ O/Q ~\ tqJ Jt ~ ~lv ~ ,.7itrif ,,\ Q fi K v ~ ~ ,t\o \ ~J ,,'1 /0 ~I\ V kV' \ ~~ r:'~lc. ~ ~ .I. \ PL \\ . ~JT' (.c -5 l" 2, L,.I... CA 0 J- I ""^ \ ) .! )".1"'0 I _J~.71:J-tt/' ,--.-!k# I .' (7 tVJ, 7q---/~ ~~~\) c; . /c..f ',;7,<<( ~4"- ~&ff:r- h1- ~-A /;);;) , k. d~ :L ,.z ' C/ ;;.,..t,,(;.,N- f/UfF~J':'"ft~~ :5~," bi:f 4 ',-\-'SCc..,w1.. O'''vvt. "\ ^,'~ '~~ ~ i~ ~~f-PO I~ ~w J~'~/ VuU' · / L/ i () .b /( I fA! ~ vi (j; T)-- I orr C'; -i' J ~ '3 & a a.~ . '~ /' ' ' Ir' ~ " f "" r. I' - "\ ~ ~$;-",,~Q ,., ~ I ;;1- q 3 ;1?;> ~. ~J ';t 1 .'~ ,." 4~b '6 ./f 1~,I'bI' ~v'O \~.. ofJ t'7 fclJ,' I \ , (b ,;fi itL. f)~ )) " {_ ( reo .' \.,- \V r. '. Y~f ~A\ ,1,) IJ ~ · rtJ} yrv \(J 0 )\ f- \.~~J c? n (h~u tj7 \y. ~ ~ . " At- \. ~ ) \ \}~ - ~ 4 U~r l:--- l ,1/ tAr ...", L ~ At: r ~d' )pfl VO IL" d: tIJ2- g bJJ- C~,,'k) (lVV" 'v. ) ~ /Yr: -~:. ,.- I~. 'I ,y)lJ' j;ll/~) ~ C/i~ ,~) lSZ) rJ 1~ rvJk .~ ~ ~ r4'* ;tuM'-'.~ -.ffv,Jd~ i ;J)1) ItY? ., pl.b ~4 pun~ tlfj ;r;up~~' u " . ~ r ~~_N-v-r fl/tA}-~f ~ ..Jt:l.l.~ ,-II--- f!c.>--,L ~ ~a{(t(.~f'~~ ~-f>~ rJ~ J:n- ~~" ~ d tlJl-r 0~ C~~'/.c) ~ ~~\vUlJ-' j;lVvr-- ~ Cfi~~) ~ rJ~ r~'*".~~ / ~r4j~~- " J1. ,., n A 1/ P i,/ P /f/ - ( rV ,~Ifi'V''^-'''''' i}-(}() wlv;;:f ? [ wlf. ~r~.~ ~~f {hv-:t ..3lJ ~~ t"- ~ ~ ~ aft~.r~~ ~-(.~ ..." ~ __ jf~ uP ~ /d r"~ _ ~~r tv f1J~ ~v~-' ~e- wl-tl~ /,ft~~ r - ___ vtP ~~'f ~ O.A.Nd~ PI: fl~~ ;2~ /~' ~ '" ~ JtJUV~ if (!~.-- /tkptfjkt~ /' e1, l/tf ~;;<. .nt4i&'S_/~ I 1 a", e, ("'if;, I#~~ J ~bt '/ (t-, {,,/l}i'/lhC/ ___ }.1 f -P...l/] '" ptt,/Vu wry liT 'ftYJ'A'^, r ~ prtf" u. / ~ _ j!J P0/f iL'~~ ~~ 1 -f6- A<a- fA ~ -Fe. -f1i~ ., - ~ _ ~.~ ~ ~v-.~ ~ ~ f ftD- v5 r1~~ 52-- ~. ~ ^, -.-h ?J od _ ~~ v$. .,.. 1- c~. J>> ~~~ " ~ '''-. '_~ r;. ~t'~}~ __ '3'(/{ 193 P + ~7'-- ~f'/ ~? ~6. ~ ~vV' ,., 1, r \'3.J J{gt-flY 1,14-?, b,;l.g r t;r4 -Io+- ~ _ 'II!f/J ~ ~~ 14 rk ~ ,'~_ r;-J.ir .r'-!tw p.),1-& '<ref. (~ ~re . V"-' U I r bivi/-I- ~f..ik CPf ? "C/ eu-\rY:. }.{p# ~ 5'c1~ I-'1f \) Cl 0 0-00 i 000 ~J \ 0000 1 \\ ' \;J "4083"'- _~ ........3 46 -\- ~ _30l~4 -\- __6-53 ...- ,. ,~2 083 :l- /V ~ ~~J+ ~ ~~i ,~?...- ;( J~ {. ~\ ~::~ ~ y 1\)1 "2 U \ -\- ~, ~i'---~5 0 66 ")-'< ~~ '-4:\~6-\- \.j " 3 0 9 \ -\- ~, :ltou8-\- ~2.05l~ -'< '~3 00 -'< ""3oUo -\- '3 02 -\- ......... 2 0 Cj \ -\- .........., 034 -\- '5046 -\- '3060 -\- "3060 -\- ,,-54 -\- '2006 -\- '-3024 -\- -~ 026 .~---------------- .y ~ ~~ /' ~ ,I ~ ( f \ \~ 0 l~(v CP vr,\ w ~V k^' 0-< fJ""~ ~ ~ 'h ~ '\ It' trip generation. The high school will most likely have 2.5 times as many ~,M. peak hour trips, but half the P.M. peak hour trips of the optional land ----J' use. (ji -t- ~fl RECOMMENDATION ~ ~ Due to the major traffic concerns that have been relayed to staff by outside reviewing@V_., agencies, further development of regional impact review is required before the proposed It~ amendment can be determined as not being a substantial deviation, as defined by state law c,,,\ - '1 ' i.9 Therefore, it is recommended that the development order amending Ordinance 94-51, not I ,,~ VJ\ be approved until all traffic concerns have been addressed and written comments have been \ L. received for incorporation into the development order (ordinance). \ \~ ':: With regard to the city's PID regulations and a determination of whether the master plan ~ changes are substantial in nature, it is recommended that the determination be made that 10 the changes are substantial in nature, unless the conditions listed below are incorporated Me? / into the ordinance amending the development order (Note - An asterisk ole at the end of" iL \ v / , condition indicates that it is to be addressed prior to approval of the development order) ~, 10 I Planning and Zoning Oepartment Memorandum No. 96-341 TO' Planning and Development Board June 21, 1996 Page 6 --T--' / I 1'~) r I / N r 3 '~lfff4 I ---1;' 1 '\ t\~ \)." ,-\.\ Where square footage is used to evaluate traffic generated by a given land use, gross square footage shall be used. ole ~ct. r, · -:-11:- \ ~ _ ~,~'(-I_ :1 l~~_ \ Commercial use shall be limited to 29 7 acres and indicated on the master plan. For purposes of traffic analysis, 426,888 gross square feet shall be used * \ 2 <'\ 'J -- J\ s Lots 53 and 54 on the master plan are school lots and shall be designated accordingly and evaluated for traffic accordingly * ~ ~'1~ ~ .:'~ ~ The traffic analysis shall be revised to evaluate all school owned lots as school useandtheoptional land use on the school lots shall be deleted, so that an automatic mechanismisinplace to trigger reanalysis of traffic in the event the- school is not built. * 5 A revised traffic study shall be submitted and approved by FDOT, Palm Beach County and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, prior to approval of the development order * ~-,,,,- ~. I A traffic analysis shall be submitted with subsequent s!te plan app~~atsfor d1J;ct J.uses that are served by Park Ridge Boulevard to momtor when'1,200 p.m. (~lp , '.1'.\ / I peak hour trips (requiring restriping of the southbound approach for dual ~J \/'" ,\\.<" lefts and a combination through/right turn lane), 1,300 p.m. peak hour trips (requiring construction of an additional right turn lane on the northbound approach to provide dual right turns), 1,935 p.m. peak hour trips (requiring adding a southbound through lane and separate out the through/right into a through and right turn only lane) and when 2,300 p.m. peak hour trips (indicating the physical limit of this intersection) is reached. t~ r~it\-. 7 \ JCiJJjVJ r q- t',r.. L, : I t" /' 9- r \ 1"\ r ! v {', I\-,Vl \!_Jc. -~~ Utility analysis shall be submitted providing information on the location of the fire flow test and impacts on the sewage lift station to determine whether existing utilities can accommodate the proposed changes. * .::> 8. Show on the master plan anew, public road connection from Park Ridge Boulevard and Quantum Lakes Drive along the west property line of Publix (lot 55) to allow emergency access to the industrial areas near the C-16 Canal. Add a note to the master plan that this road shall be constructed upon opening of the high school. * (Timing of the road construction should be Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No 96-341 TO Planning and Development Board June 21, 1996 Page 6 trip generation. The high school will most likely have 2.5 times as many A.M. peak hour trips, but half the P M. peak hour trips of the optional land use. RECOMMENDATION Due to the major traffic concerns that have been relayed to staff by outside reviewing agencies, further development of regional impact review is required before the proposed amendment can be determined as not being a substantial deviation, as defined by state law Therefore, it is recommended that the development order amending Ordinance 94-51, not be approved until all traffic concerns have been addressed and written comments have been received for incorporation into the development order (ordinance) With regard to the city's PID regulations and a determination of whether the master plan changes are substantial in nature, it is recommended that the determination be made that the changes are substantial in nature, unless the conditions listed below are incorporated into the ordinance amending the development order (Note - An asterisk * at the end of a condition indicates that it is to be addressed prior to approval of the development order) 'tJ ~re square footage is used to evaluate traffic generated by a given land use, gross squa~ footage shall be used * h:. _ li;v~ 0Lr/~. (\O"Y &w-- ~/ _A 2 Co'lpmer,- use s be Ii . d to 29 7. res and' I ted on t ster \"J e:J J plai\. For r es ffic 's, 42 , ross sq are et shall used ''*- ....,,-- 6 t tL--' ~o 3 Lots 53 and 54 on the master plan are school lots and shall be designated accordingly and evaluated for traffic accordingly * 4 The tr~ffi~ analysis shall be revised to evaluate all school owned lots as school us~anqthtt>Ptional land use on the school lots shall be deleted, so that an automatic mechanisnfi+~lace to trigger reanalysis of traffic in the event the school is not built * ' 5 A revised traffic study shall be submitted and approved by FDOT, Palm Beach County and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, prior to approval of the development order * A traffic analysis shall be submitted with subsequent site plan approvals fo]~ uses that are served by Park Ridge Boulevard to monitor when 1,200 p.rn peak hour trips (requiring restriping of the southbound approach for dual lefts and a combination through/right turn lane), 1,300 p.m. peak hour trips (requiring construction of an additional right turn lane on the northbound approach to provide dual right turns), 1,935 p.m. peak hour trips (requiring adding a southbound through lane and separate out the through/right into a ~ J through and right turn only lane) and when 2,300 p.m. peak hour trips , {t1 (indicating the physical limit of this intersection) is reached. -, p~ [f~ '-Utility millys' . JJ iI () the fire flQW -t ac he sewage lift statio ' ~~ ~~~:t:,::J:c~.~e~~.' , ' ',~~I \ Show onrtJte master plan anew, public road connection from Park R d~ ~ \ Boulevard and Quantu, kes Drive alo g t e west property Ii Publix (lot 55) to ~lIow emer~ncy access to he in strial areas ar the 6 C~nal Add' a note t? ;.the m ter pi that this oad shall e constructe upo~pening ~f the h~h school ming of the ro const ction should be ~ Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No 96-341 TO Planning and Development Board June 21, 1996 Page 7 made a condition of the development order as well ) ~9 On the master plan, revise the shaded area of the roadway at lot 45A to permit public access to the cul-de-sac. * o~ A~e app,",nt sh~,~ntact the Treasure Coast Region~lanning Coun . J' de~e i~/proPQsed 5~e has ~pact on1he 14~ acre sa Pine~ preserve, south of Gafew3'y Bo~ *u \.~ "----- ~II ( i " Delete~he addit~al2610ts p oposed fo//~ercial~ exc. fo~ lots \!.CarM~ - ~6.54 at\res) ~d res re 10j1)1 as co~merciat 0 Ide If location 0129 7 acr~f commercial space. * ~ If the Commission determines that additional commercial space is acceptable along Gateway Boulevard, specifically lots 65A, 65B, 82, 83, 84, 85 and 91, the following additional condition is recommended 12. Prior to the first site plan approval of a commercial lot along Gateway Boulevard, design standards shall be developed in conjunction with staff and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council for commercial lots along Gateway Boulevard to prevent the following: l a) '\.'bdivision- arcels i er lots a net lll~ i~e cu~rent num e; of lots, ~ retail uildings with multiple ba, ~ (single u bui!~/ \ d) \ { _,9.. .-r_ /'~ I-.:r ff- k",^ll-.L~ If /t,. ~ d -""" ""f"'dA n.4- ~_q an increase in the number of freestanding signs that is _ '5' currently permitted (one per lot), ___ ~ ~ -::> r-, - jLl:t ~ -ff ~n increase ~the number ~ buildings t~ is curren~ anticipated to be constructed (oQe building per ~with no . outparcels or outbuildings), ____ c) ~e) an increase in the number of access points onto Gateway Boulevard currently anticipated to be constructed (one access point per lot with cross access encouraged), and to encourage the following: ;---1) landscaping in excess of the landscape code. TJH.bme xc: Central File a:QUANTPRK.TJH Planning and Zonin~ .tJepartment Memorandum No. 96-341 TO Planning and Development Board June 21, 1996 Page 7 \~\ r 9 4iitfff'10 . '\ made a condition of the development order as wel)') , On the master plan, revise the shaded area of the roadway at lot 45A to permit public access to the cul-de-sac.. The applicant shall contact the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council to determine if the proposed change has any impact on the 14.3 acre sand pine preserve, south of Gateway Boulevard. * N f" 11 '~ j -/ .lY\ 'V)'t./I.I\ 17 (,' J i __ lJ ,. :..... -; '~./ ".l...C{},. P'y If the Commission determines that additional commercial space is acceptable along Gateway Boulevard, specifically lots 65A, 65B, 82, 83, 84, 85 and 91, the following additional condition is recommended. ( r\ t....J...-." 11- ,) (;~ [" L 12. \-c TJH.bme xc: Central File lI:QUANTPRK.TJH Delete the additional 26 lots proposed for commercial, except for lots 76 - 80 (CarMax - 16.54 acres) and restore lot 61 as commercial to identify the exact location of 29 7 acres of commercial space.. Prior to the first site plan approval of a commercial lot along Gateway Boulevard, design standards shall be developed in conjunction with staff and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council for commercial lots along Gateway Boulevard to prevent the following' a) subdivision of parcels into smaller lots yielding a net increase in the current number of lots; b) retail buildings with multiple bays leasable to different uses (single use buildings required), c) an increase in the number of freestanding signs that is currently permitted (one per lot); d) an increase in the number of buildings that is currently anticipated to be constructed (one building per lot with no outparcels or outbuildings); e) an increase in the number of access points onto Gateway Boulevard currently anticipated to be constructed (one access point per lot with cross access encouraged); and to encourage the following' t) landscaping in excess of the landscape code. PRUJl:.C'l' 'l'l'l'LE LJEtiLRIP'l'ION 'l'YPE DA'l'E REC' D 1 H.J\LK1NG LUG - ::i1 J'.I:. PLAN lU.V _H.W ::iUtlM1'l"j'Al, ~J~,-,~fl~ 1!!hCr m~ NU iJ/?//1 q6~ NEW SITE PLAN MAJuR ~ITE PLAN MODIFICA'l'ION AMOUNT RECEIPT Nu * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED CULURED ELEVATIUNS RECID (Plans shall be pre-assembled The Planning & zoning Dept will number each sheet of their set The Planning Dept set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match ) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL DATE ACCEPTED --nENIED DATE DATE OF LETTER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DENIED DATE DATE DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER REVIEWERIS NAME * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Label TRC Departments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW ~~ I DATE SENT RETURN DATE ~~~ REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED MEMO NUMBER / "C" /- /- / .2:- /- /_- Planhinrr Building Engineer Engineer Forester MEMO # / DATE / / :9, ~ar /fi,( '6 / / MEMO # / DATE / "c" / /- / /- / /- / /- / /- PLANS PLANS util P W Parks Fire Police TYPE UF VARIANCE(S) DATE uF MEETING DATE OF LETTER SENT Tu APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS (Aesthetic Review App I dates of board mtgs & checklist sent out w/ comments) NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW (Must be assembled Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORED ELEVATIONS REC' D: MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW DATE SENT: MEMO # RETURN DATE 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL PLANS MEMO # / DATE /"R/D" PLANS util / / Planning P W 1__1 Building Parks /__/ Engineer rtiJ... e - /__1 Engineer Police /_-_/ Forester MEMO # I DATE I / / / I IIIR/D" I I / 1___. / LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGN~ PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD CC/CRA DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT A TRACKING ::iP l'H/\LKING LU:.. - til'l'b PLAN lU.V.lhW tiUtlHl'l"l'Al. P RuJ be'l' '1'1'1' LE liE tieRl f''l'IUN 'l'YPE DA'l'E REC I D OUANTUM r.....RK PID li'ILl'.: NU DRIA 96-002 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT NEW ~ITE PLAN MAJuR SITE PLAN MODIFICATIUN AMOUNT RECEIPT NO * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED CuLuRED ELEVATIUNS REC'D (Plans shall be pre-assembled The Planning & Zoning Dept will number each sheet of their set The planning Dept set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match ) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCEPTED -sBNIED DATE: DATE OF LET'fER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DENIED DATE DATE DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER REVIEWER'S NAME * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Label TRC Departments on each set of plans) DATE A~D MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW DATE SENT 5/15/96 RETURN DATE 5/24/96 MEMO NUMBER 96-259 1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED MEMO # / DATE / "C" g(;~ICj~=~/~ / /- 3& -J.JpZ-- ~ 5/2'-1 ~ C/ _ ! util P W Parks Fire Police PLANS Y. y MEMO # / DATE / "C" ~'-/~ /~.J " / C/ ~ _ - 110 / ~ / C/' ("-1(" '~'(..I / / :::fZ: ~ Q~ / ;-1 /~ . 0;1. , / ,):l 0 / ~ VARIANCE(S) PLANS Plannin(T Building Engineer Engineer Forester y y' . 'l'YPE uE' DATE uF MEETING DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: (Aesthetic Review App , dates of board mtgs & checklist sent out w/ comments) NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOHES NULL AND VOID DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW (Must be assembled Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORED ELEVATIONS REC' D: ~~~~ ::~i: T~pR~ TO PERFOR=E~~d # ~~fr~e.. ~l.ct~'~l RETURN DATE: sf$/ util P W Parks Fire Police 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL PLANS MEMO # / ~/"R/D" PLANS MEMO # / DATE /uR/D" ~ CJ(r,ri~ /::."73( / U Planning y / / Y <1 " - \ 'J..I.~ / / v Building ,..." C, *'Q?) /Sl::w Ie.. '-1 -0( . . ~~~~*7 I I Engineer I I /~I C/ Engineer I I t / 0 / (1/ Forester .. I I { LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGN~ PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD CC/CRA DA'l'E APPROVAL LE'I'TER ~ENT A TRACKING tiP DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-205 ~lli@rno ! \ D ~ r , - 'U nJN I I . rn PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. TO' Tambn J Heyden, Planmng & Zomng Drrector ttM- Huldll. P.E., CIty Engmeer June 10, 1996 FROM. DATE. RE QUANTUM PARK PID - REZONING We have revIewed the drawmgs receIved May 28, 1996 and offer the followmg comments. 1 ReVise shaded area of roadway at lot 45A to permIt publIc access to cul-de-sac 2 ProvIde publIc road along west SIde of lot 55 between Park RIdge Boulevard and Quantum Lakes Dnve to allow emergency access to mdustnal areas near the C-16 canal. 3 DepIct new Motorola bUIldmg. 4 ElImmate commercIal desIgnatIOn south of railroad spur (lots 73A, 74, 75 and 76) as prevIously dIscussed. 5 Elumnate commercIal desIgnatIOn from lots along Gateway Boulevard (63,64, 65A, 65B, 82, 83, 84, 85 and 91) as prevIously dIscussed. 6 ProvIde corrected traffic study WVH/ck C:QLANTPlD ~'88 Board 01 Supervisors C. Slanley Weaver Kermit Dell John I. Whitworth III Secl8lllrylManager William G. Winters Aasl&lant Manager Richard S. Wheelihan Anorney Perry & SChone. P.A. LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~-^ -^~~/ -^-~} _~A.._ A.J-/ 13081 MILITARY TRAIL DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33484 June 5, 1996 1m rn@rnuwrnrn, JLW r 0 ~ l.PJ , . i I I 1 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. Tambri J Heyden, Director City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Dear Ms. Heyden. Subject: Technical Review Committee Agenda The Lake Worth Dramage DIstnct offers the followmg comment regardmg the Items on the May 24, and June 4, 1996 meetmg agendas. 1 Knuth Road PCD ServIce StatIOn - No objection. 2 Quantum Park PID - No ObjectIOn to the proposed change. 3 Boynton Commons CorporatIOn - No ObjectIOn. 4 Flowers Warehouse!DIstributIOn Center (Quantum Park PID) - No ObjectIOn. Please be adVIsed that a dramage reVIew wIll be needed pnor to any constructIOn whIch may' alter the Clliicnt draInage patterns of an}. project in the L "'JvTID We appreciate bemg gIven the OppOrtunIty to comment on the above. Smcerely, ,----' P AMlSJW/mfb c Shaughn J Webb, ChIefInspector, L WDD Delray Beach & Boca Raton 498--5363 Boynton Beach & West Palm Beach 737-3835 FAX (407) 495-9694 rD) K@ rn 0 WI rn fiiI jlnJ JUN 4 mi I~I ~ PLANNING AND '" ZONING DEPT. . FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO 96-267 TO' Tambn Heyden, Drrector Planning & Zonmg Department FROM. Wilham D Cavanaugh, FPO I Fire Department DATE June 4,1996 RE Master Plan Modrlications Quantum AsSOcIates /lO{J ~A At this time, we feel the origmal deSIgnatIons In the master plan should remaIn. cc Cluef Jordan FPO II Campbell File 'I ~ ill rn \V rnowrn 001 JUN 3. MEMORANDUM ! ~ UtIlItIes # 96-198 ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPl TO Tambn J Heyden, Planmng & Zonm Date May 31,1996 FROM John A. GUIdry, DIrector of UtIlItIes SUBJECT Quantum Park, DR! Second Review Staff has revIewed the above referenced project and offer the followmg comments UtIlItIes has no comment at thIS tIme It IS our recommendatIOn that the plan proceed through the reVIew process. If you have any questIOns regardmg thIS subject, please contact SkIp Milar at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404 sm/Quantum2 xc Clyde "SkIp" Milor Peter Mazzella P FIle TO' FROM. DATE. REF ~ @~ ~ L \YL~~~" ~ ~~ "0 -~ U I' t '_~c _,_ ~_,"w _,,.-J TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANN!NW& ZONING DIRECTOR, Pi.u, .-;] SGT MARLON HARRIS ~d_ u:,_J _!~-- 30 MAY 96 QUANTUM PARK - DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT-2nd MEMO #0238 BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT I have revIewed the above plans and fin,4"':Q.(rP\?15Ifnf~'att~~:~::~e. ...... G:\WPlTROQITRC0238.WPD BUILDING DIVISION -, --------_.._--'-,."'] 00-- ] D ~ ~-2~~ ,J i , MEMORANDUM NO 96-200 PLANNING AND 'IONIN DE". May 30, 1996 To Tambn Heyden, Planmng & Zomng DIrector From. Al Newbold, Deputy Development DIrector Re Quantum Park PID Master Plan ModIficatIOn The Bmldmg DIVISIOn has revIewed the proposed changes m land use desIgnatIOn and has no comments at the present time We support the posItion of the Planmng & Zomng Department. ~~/ Al Newbol AN:mh Attachment: 2nd ReVIew Plans cc Wilham V HukIll, P.E, Development DIrector C \WPWIN60\WPDOCS\TRC\QUANTUM.WPD !D) g @ ~ tli,~ lJl) M~v ~ 0 1995 ~ PLANNiNG AND ZONING DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #96-124 TO Tambn J Heyden, P1annmg & Zomng DIrector Robert EIchorst, PublIc Works DIrector ~ Larry QUInn, SamtatIOn Supenntendent THRU FROM SUBJ Master Plan ModIficatIOn - Quantum Park PID DATE May 30, 1996 The PublIc Works Department has no comments m reference to the above master plan modIficatIOn. Larry QUInn SamtatIOn Supenntendent LQ/cr \fUI ~ p ~ u w ~~ \L~\MAY 28 ~ J~ RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-264 \ Lpe7'~iG ~m li' ~N~ oFt'l ~-- TO' Tambn Heyden, Plannmg & Zomng DIrector John Wildner, Parks supenntendentr Quantum Park PUD - Masterplan Modification FROM. RE DATE. May 28, 1996 The RecreatIon & Park Department has reViewed the Quantum Park PUD Masterplan Modification. There are no recreation related comments. The project may contmue through the normal reView process JW ill [ rnllW~ MAY I'. rn RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 96-262 PLANNING A~D ZONING DEPT. TO Tambri Heyden, Planning DIrector FROM. I'~~~ Kevin J Hallahan, EnvlfonmentalIst/F orester "cJ I J DATE. May 24, 1996 SUBJECT Quantwn Park PID change 14 Acres from PCD to PID The individua110ts in the application are adjacent to the existIng sand pine preserve of 14.3 acres (lot #71). The change In usage of these lots may affect this preserve area. The Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) has requested certain lots to be held for micro-site acreage. The lots shown in thIs applIcatIOn may be part of those areas. TCRPC should be contacted to request a response to these Issues. There are existIng slash pIne trees (ecosystems) on some of the lots lIsted In the applIcatlon. These trees would be mventoried under the CIty Tree Preservation Ordinance. The project should contmue under the normal review process. KH.cm t rn BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 96-194 May 23, 1996 To Tambn Heyden, Planmng & ZOnIng Director From. Phihp Sy, Plan Check Inspector Re Quantum Park PID Master Plan ModificatIOn ~rnDW~rnl IW 23- I@' , PlANNING A!IIO ZONING OEPT. The Bmldmg DivisiOn has reViewed the above plans and has no comments at the present time ~~ Phihp Sy \ \ PS'mh Attachment: Plans cc Al Newbold, Deputy Development DIrector Wilham V Hukill, P.E. Development Duector C WPWIN60\WPDOCS\TRC\QUAKTUM.WPD MEMORANDUM UtIlItIes # 96-186 rn ~ M: :; ~ 00 PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT. TO Tambn J Heyden, Planmng & Zonm FROM John A. GUIdry, DIrector of UtIlIties Date May 23, 1996 SUBJECT Quantum Park PID Master Plan Modification Staff has revIewed the above referenced project and offer the followmg comments. 1 UtIlIties has no comment at thIS time It IS our recommendatIOn that the plan proceed through the reVIew process. If you have any questIOns regardmg thIS subject, please contact SkIp Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404 smlquantum xc Clyde "SkIp" Milar Peter Mazzella ,A... FIle - ~'" .1:~~~~~ \ PLANNiNG fiNO May 23, 1996 IONING DEPT. Boatd of Supervisors c. Stanley Weaver Kermit Dell John I. Whitworth III SecretarylManager William G. Winters Assistant Manager ichard S. Wheelihan Attorney Perry & Schone, P.A. LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ,,--^-^^~~~"-j--j-~ ;'~./,-. 13081 MILITARY TRAIL DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33484 Tambri J Heyden, Director CIty of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Department POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Dear Ms. Heyden. Subject: Technical Review Committee Agenda The Lake Worth Dramage DIstrict offers the followmg comment regardmg an Item on the May 21, 1996 meeting agenda. 1 Quantum Park, prD - The L WDD has no objection to the proposed change. Please be adVIsed that a dramage reVIew WIll be needed pnor to any constructIOn whIch may alter the current drainage patterns of any project in the L WDD We apprecIate bemg gIven the OpportunIty to comment on the above. Smcerely, P AM/SJW/mtb c Shaughn J Webb, ChIefInspector, L WDD Delray Beach & Boca Raton 498-5363 BoynlDn Beach & West Palm Beach 737-3835 FAX (407) 495-9694 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #96-110 TO T ambn J Heyden, Plannmg & Zonmg DIrector Robert EIchorst, Pubhc Works DIrector ~ THRU FROM Larry QUInn, SamtatIOn Supenntendent SUBJ Master Plan ModificatIOn - Quantum Park PID DATE May 17, 1996 The Pubhc Works Department has no comments m reference to the above SIte. Larry QUInn SamtatIOn Supermtendent LQ/cr ~l1" J ffi a WI rn "i :~ uJ MAY 2 0 .. L rn PLANNING A~D ZONING OEPT. TO FROM DATE REF rFn I' II r11 , ~ U I i\ BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMf TRAFFIC UNIT '-' ~@rnuw~ ['1M 2 0 1996 PLANNING A!'lO ZONING OEPT. TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT MARLON HARRIS 16 MAY 96 QUANTUM PARK PID - DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 1st REVIEW MEMO #0234 WI I I have reviewed the above plans and find no problems at this time Respectively, 41/J!;;t. Sgt. Marlon Harris ..., MEMORANDUM 23 March 1986 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board FROM Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director RE Boynton Beach Park of Commerce - Master Plan Amendment INTRODUCTION On January 21, 1986 the Planning Department transmitted a packet of materials which taken together constituted a request for an amendment to the Development Order which approved the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce (BBPOC), Development of Regional Impact. Copies of these amendment packages were also forwarded to the Mayor and Council, the City Manager, the Technical Review Board, the City Attorney, the Library, the Chamber of Commerce, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the State Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Resource Management The amendments requested to the Development Order which approved the BBPOC (Ordinance No. 84-51 copy attached) are as follows: 1 Section #3: The Amendment application procedure and the subsequent proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes, Chapter 380 2 Section #4 subsection (1): Paragraph (C) shall be added as follows (C) Boynton Beach Park of Commerce ADA, Amended Master Site Development Plan submitted 21 January 1986 1 3. References throughout the Development Order shall be revised to conform to the Amended Master Site Development Plan, as approved. Such revisions shall be made in the interest of consistency and clarity. As a part of the Master Plan review process, additional sections of the Development Order may be recommended for amendment by the City's Technical Staff. PROCEDURE Procedurally, the amendment request to the approved development order is governed by Section 7 of Appendix A - Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances which establishes Planned Industrial Development Districts and by Chapter 380.06(19), Florida Statutes for a determination of a substantial deviation As previously reported, the City Council must conduct a public hearing at which a determination of whether or not the proposed change requires further development of regional impact review If no further review is required, the City Council shall issue an amended development order which in this instance requires the passage of an ordinance which amends the original development order. If a determination is made that the proposed change requires further development of regional impact review, the review shall be conducted only on those aspects of the development order required to be changed The above-mentioned public hearing shall receive a fifteen (15) days public notice following the passage of thirty (30) days but not more than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the amendment materials It is anticipated that the City Council will conduct its hearing on April 22, 1986. This amendment procedure will require a one-time change to our development regulations For non-development of regional impact planned industrial developments, the City Council must make a finding related to the degree of change; that is, whether or not it is substantial, and then, the Planning and Zoning Board approves, approves with modifications, or denies the request. In this instance, the City council must approve any change. Therefore, the Planning and Zoning Board must act in an advisory capacity to the Council, as the State Statutes prevail over City ordinances 2 One area of concern involves the applicants desire to locate five commercial sites (21 acres) plus a Club (3 4) acres along the south side of N.W 22nd Avenue. The proposed arrangement of commercial land uses seems to change the character of the Planned Industrial Development and N.W. 22nd Avenue. Instead of projecting to the public an image of an industrial/office park, the public will be exposed to a commercial strip This is clearly in opposition to the intent stated in the Planned Industrial Development District Regulations which reads as follows: "The purpose of this district is to provide a zoning classification for light industrial development that will better satisfy current demands for light industrial zoned lands by encouraging development which will reflect changes in the technology of land development and relate the development of land to the specific site and to conserve natural amenities." The desired location for commercial activities may also be in conflict with Comprehensive Plan policies which reject strip commercial development. Therefore, the commercial/retail sites should be considered to be an adjunct to the light industrial, office, and research and development land uses, and should be relocated to a less prominent site within the Park. The second area of concern involves the proposed treatment of water distribution in the Planned Industrial Development Specifically, more detailed information on the proposed water uses will be required before final designs are accepted, as noted in the attached Memorandum from Pete Mazzella, Utility Engineer REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL As previously noted, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council is a party to the amendment process If concerns are raised by the requested amendments, the Council must notify the City that it will be represented at the City Council public hearing. In this regard, the Council has raised a question concerning the proposed 40 acre scrub pine forest preserve as noted in the attached letter from the Council to George Zimmerman, and as noted, the Council will be represented at the City Council's public hearing to present its concerns 4 RECOMMENDATION The Technical Review Board recommends to the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Council that a finding of no substantial change be found with respect to the requested changes to the BBPOC Development Order. This recommendation is based on the agreements reached with the applicant as stated in his letter of February 28, 1986 (see attached) Furthermore, it is recommended that the applicant redesign his master plan and place his commercial land uses in a cluster along the central NE/SW collector road south of NW 22nd Avenue . C~___)(" ~7__ CARMEN S. ANNUNZ 0 /bks 5 Quantum Park Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard Prepared for Quantum ASSOcIates Prepared by KImley-Hom and AssOcIates, Inc April 1996 049029 00 <<:i Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 1996 EXHIBIT "e" TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ANALYSIS 2 Background Traffic Forecast Project Traffic Volumes 2 3 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS 7 CONCLUSIONS 9 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 - 2013 PM Peak Turning Movement Volumes 2 Table 2 - PM Peak Hour Trip Generation 4 LIST OF FIGURES Figures 1 - Gateway Boulevard and Park Ridge Boulevard Turning Movement Coun~ 6 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard INTRODUCTION This study responds to Section 5 of the revised 1994 Quantum Park DRI Development Order by providing an analysis of the access to that part of the project served by Park Ridge Boulevard A previous approval for a new high school site requires all other project development, which is served by High Ridge Road, to access Gateway Boulevard at the High Ridge Road intersection The high school will have access to Gateway Boulevard at two locations consistent with the original access plan As a part of the study, three small parcels, which were not included in the original ADA, have been added These parcels total approximately 14 acres and are located between Park Ridge Boulevard and 1-95, south of Gateway Boulevard Although land is being added, no additional traffic demands will be created since previously approved development entitlements will be shifted to these sites from other portions of the development. The present study includes an evaluation of the effects of these changes. As a part of the access evaluation, a proposed CarMax site is included in this study The CarMax site will include 13 7 acres including 4 acres ofthe 14 acres which are being added to Quantum Park. H;\wp\Quantum.Rpt April 9 1996 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard ANALYSIS BACKGROUND TRAFFIC FORECAST Turning-movement counts were performed at the intersection of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard to develop a baseline for background traffj~. Consistent with the methodology in the original ADA, the PM peak hour is used for evaluation The counts were made on March 21,1996 from 4'00 to 6'00 PM are attached From these counts PM peak hour turning-movements were developed and grown to the year 2013 The study year is consistent with the original ADA. A review of traffic growth trends since the opening of the 1-95 interchange, shows a significant mitial growth in response to the opening and a growth of 4 percent during the last two years. The database is not adequate to actually establish a growth trend Discussions with the MPO staff revealed that a very small growth is projected by the 2015 model after consideration of Quantum Park project traffic growth Therefore, a compound growth rate of 2 percent per year was selected to represent a conservative background traffic growth The total growth of 40 percent was added to existing turning movements to reflect the 2013 background traffic. Table 1 summarizes the projected volumes at the mtersection in the year 2013 TABLE 1 2013 PM PEAK TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (Background Traffic) Movement PM Peak Hour (1996) PM Peak Hour (2013) Eastbound Through 944 1322 Eastbound Right* 2 2 Eastbound Left 86 120 Westbound Through 1122 1571 Westbound Right 178 249 Westbound Left* 30 30 Northbound Through* 6 6 Northbound Right* 82 82 Northbound Left* 4 4 Southbound Through* 6 6 Southbound Right 115 161 Southbound Left 146 204 *These turns include only project trips and, therefore, no background traffic adjustment is applicable. 2 H ;\wp\Quantum. Rpt April 9 1996 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES An trip generation analysis of the potential trips generated by the properties located to the south of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road was then performed This analysis was performed generally usmg the 5th Edition ITE Trip Generation Manual The analysis updates the 1984 ADA, to include the proposed CarMax Site/. the high school and the inclusion of lots 80, 81, and 82 Table 2 demonstrates the probable trip generation and directional distribution for the proposed land uses for the PM peak hour The trip generation for the CarMax site was based upon trip generation research for a CarMax site in Orlando, conducted by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and approved by the City of Orlando. Presently, the ITE Trip Generation Manual 5th Edition recommends a daily trip generation rate for new car sales of 4791 trips per 1000 square feet of gross floor area. Due to the small sample size (3 sites) ITE recommends using this number with caution, as the three sites provided a range of 15 64 to 79 96 trips/l 00 SF G FA. For the proposed CarMax location in Orlando, Kimley-Horn used a rate of 23 0 trips/1000 SF GFA. ThiS trip generation rate was developed based upon observations of the trip generation charactenstics of a similar facility Several days of counts at this location demonstrated that approximately 12 percent of the daily trips occur during the PM peak. From this a trip generation rate of 2 75 tnps/l 000 SF GFA during the PM peak was used for analysis. This is consistent with a previous study of 15 new car dealerships which returned an average of 2.40/1000 SF GFA m the PM peak. This number IS more conservative for the CarMax site as the dealership only sells used cars and does not provide maintenance service to the general public, only to its customers. Thus, CarMax is likely to generate at a rate below those of new car dealerships. It is further noted that in comparison to the previously proposed land uses where the CarMax site will be located, the CarMax has a favorable trip generation rate. The balance of the undeveloped sites were generated very conservatively on an individual basis. It is likely, that as development occurs, sites will be aggregated such that the actual tnp generation will be lower By using the conservative rates, however, maximum assurance is provided relative to the adequacy of access while providing flexibility in the future development plan In essence, any development program which generated no more than 1935 PM peak hour trips can have adequate access via the High Ridge Road intersection Trip Assignment The traffic assignment pattern was based upon the ADA with consideration of trends since the ADA was prepared The ADA showed a traffic assignment of travel to and from Park Ridge Boulevard as being 31 percent to and from the west, 22 percent to and from the north, and 47 percent to and from the east. To be conservative, the distribution to and from the east was increased to 60 percent 3- H;\wp\Quantum.Rpt April 9 1996 TABLE 2 PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION I LOT # I LAND USE ! ACRES ! Floor Area! Trips ! In ! Out I 46A Industrial 2.05 35719 15 2 13 47A Industrial 139 24219 10 1 9 478 Industrial 086 14985 6 1 5 48A Industrial 148 25788 11 1 9 488 Industrial 148 25788 11 1 9 48C&D I Industrial 352 61332 26 3 22 508&C Industrial 541 94264 39 5 35 50A Industrial 1 41 24568 10 1 9 51D Industrial 1.21 21083 9 1 8 56 Industrial 302 52620 22 3 19 57 Industrial 58 101059 42 5 37 72 Industrial 546 95135 40 5 35 70 Industrial 36 62726 26 3 23 69 Industrial 36 62726 26 3 23 ; 738 Industrial 1 34 23348 10 1 9 73A Industrial 3.24 56454 24 3 21 74 Industrial 2.71 47219 20 2 17 75 Industrial 302 52620 22 3 19 76 Industrial 343 59764 25 3 22 68A Industrial 2.06 35893 15 2 13 688 Industrial 154 26833 11 1 10 TOTALS INDUSTRIAL 5763 1004145 418 50 368 ; 77,78,79,80 CarMax 13 787 42580 117 59 59 81 Commercial 416 45302 82 Commercial 586 63815 TOTALS COMMERCIAL 1002 109118 694 347 347 66 Office 355 61855 130 22 108 67A Office 245 42689 99 17 82 67C Office 201 35022 86 15 71 678 Office 188 32757 82 14 68 658 Office 2.41 41992 98 17 81 TOTALS OFFICE 12 214315 495 84 411 , N/A High School* N/A 80 23 57 Subtotal of Future Project Trips 1805 563 1242 468,46C,4 7C,4 7D,49 ,49A,55 Exist Dvlpd. Parcels 66.29 N/A 130 38 92 TOTAL OF ALL PROJECT TRIPS 1935 601 1334 *Represents portion of traffic accessing school site from Park Ridge Boulevard Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard with appropriate adjustments to the other directions. The project traffic was assigned to the Intersection, based on these percentages, and added to eXisting project tripS Project trips for turning movements not related to Park Ridge Boulevard were adjusted as follows so that the total project travel remains consistent with the original ADA (i e., no increase in project trips) Directional project link volumes, north and east of the Park Ridge Boulevard intersection, were held constant. That is to say, that the eastbound through project trips were reduced by the increase in the northbound right-turning project traffic volume. The eastbound left-turn project trips were reduced by the increase in the northbound through volume. The westbound project through trips were reduced by the increase in the westbound left-turning project trips, and the southbound right-turn volume was reduced by the increase In the southbound through volume. Project trips were then added to background traffic to establish total forecast volumes. From thiS analysis turning movements for the total traffic occurring dUring the PM peak at the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road were determined for the full build out year (2013) These turning movements are recorded in Figure 1 5- H;\wp\Quantum.Rpt April 9 1996 GATEWAY BLVD of FARK RIDGE BLVD FM FEAK TURNING MOVEMENTS (2e>13) GATEWAY 6LVD o(!)t:: ~O>:::!:. O>(!)~ NO>N J l ~ (220) 100 -3" (2276) 954 - (137) 137 ~ NOT TO SCALE ~ w \'J Q It :r \'J :r ""t:-150 (399) -409 (19801 ..-368 (368) ~ --l 10 w \'J Q It ~ '<l (l ~ t t NLOl'-- OON r<lNOO (\ii!)t=" OON r<lNOO -- - ~_.. Kimley-Hom I11II.....I_ ~ and Associates, Inc. FM PEAK HOUR TRAl"TIC YOLlNE&: FIGURE 1 --+ DIrection GATEWAY BLVD AND PARK RIDGE BLVD 100 Project (220) Project, ExI6tIng and Other Growth TURN ING MOVEMENT COUNTS QUANTUM PARK 4/9/96 04l1029OO\tmc.d'"'il 049029.00 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard I NTERSECTION ANALYSIS The intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road was analyzed for the build out year 2013, for the PM peak total traffic volumes shown in Figure 1 This analysis mcluded the investigation of any timing, phasing or geometric improvements that may be required in the future for the signal to operate at an acceptable level-of-service. A highway capacity analysis was undertaken and it was determined that if full trip generation potential occurs, improvements to the intersections geometrics would be required to provide an adequate level of service. The existing geometry of the intersection is as follows. Northbound three lanes, single left, through, and a shared through/right. Southbound three lanes, single left, through, and a shared through/right. East and Westbound - six lanes. dual lefts, three through lanes, and a right turn only lane. It was determined that to provide adequate capacity at full buildout (2013) dual lefts would be required in the southbound direction and dual rights would be needed northbound This could be accomplished by restriping the southbound lanes to dual/efts and a single through/right, and by constructing an additional right-turn lane on the northbound approach This configuration will provide adequate capacity, Level-of-Service "0", for the full buildout of the development, includmg the 1935 PM peak trips generated by the portion of the project served by Park Ridge Boulevard These intersection Improvements will not be needed, however, until justified by the growth in project trips. The eXisting intersection geometry will support 1200 project trips served by Park Ridge Boulevard An analysis was performed to determine the PM peak hour thresholds to stage the improvements to the existing intersection Stage 1 - Existing Condition - without lane additions to the existing intersection, but restriping the southbound approach for dual lefts and a through/right, the south portion of the development can generate up to 1300 PM peak hour trips and still operate at an acceptable Level-of-Service "0" Stage 2 - Full Buildout - with the modifications discussed in the above paragraph (restriping for dual lefts southbound and adding a lane for dual right-turn lanes northbound), the intersection can operate at an acceptable Level-of- Service "0" under full buildout condition (1935 PM peak hour trips from the southern section of the development) Stage 3 - Increased Capacity - additional capacity beyond what is needed at full buildout can be provided by, in addition to the improvements in Stage 2, adding a lane southbound and separating out the through/right into a through and a right-turn-only lane. This configuration will provide adequate capacity at Level-of-Service "0" up to 2300 PM peak hour trips from the portion of the project served by Park Ridge Boulevard 7 H;\wp\Quantum.Rpt April 9 1996 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard The analyses for all the stages is attached It should be noted that these numbers are very conservative, as for each stage the background traffic and traffic generated by other portions of the project were held at the full buildout year levels. An additional analysis was performed to determine the impact of trip intensity shifting from the south to north of the intersection It was determined that if a portion of the trip generation Intensity were to occur to the north of the intersection, that was originally project to occur south of the intersection, the level-of-service for the intersection would actually increase as fewer tripS would go through the intersection An example analysis of this, where 25 percent of the trip generation of the south was moved north of the intersection is attached This analysis resulted in a lower total intersection delay than if the tripS were to have occurred in the south Such a result is expected since the north/south traffic through the intersection is reduced -8- H;\wp\Quantum.Rpt April 9 1996 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard CONCLUSIONS Based upon the analysis provided in thiS study, it can be concluded that: o Adequate access can be provided for the site by one intersection o Adequate capacity is provIded for the additional parcels. o CarMax is a favorable land use from a trip generation stand pOint. o No improvements are needed until the Park Ridge Boulevard trips exceed 1200 per hour o Restriping on the north approach to provide dual lefts will serve 1300 peak hour trips. o A northbound right-turn lane addition to provide dual nghts will serve 1900 trips. o A southbound right-turn lane addition will serve 2300 trips. o land use changes from office to commercial north of Gateway Boulevard (parcels 83, 84, 85 and 91) can be made WIthout changing the conclusions of this study if the "increase in trips" IS deducted from the preceding thresholds. o Moving trip generation from south of Gateway Boulevard to north of Gateway Boulevard on High Ridge Road improves intersection operation o The intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road will operate at full buildout at a satisfactory level-of-Service "0" 9- H;\wp\Quantum.Rpt April 9 1996 HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4a 04-09-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ======================================================================= Streets (E-W) Gateway Analyst KLF Area Type Other Comment Max voluume (N-S) High File Name 3-26-96 PM with no improvements Ridge EXISTING HC9 Peak ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - - -- - - -- No Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 < Volumes 220 2276 86 232 1980 399 190 129 521 417 60 198 Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 RTOR Vols 16 40 40 22 Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds NB Right * EB Right * SB Right WB Right * Green 10 OA 47 OA Green 15 OA 17 OA Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 Cycle Length 105 secs Phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- EB L 371 3539 0 645 0 105 31 8 D 38 6 D T 2555 5588 1 032 0 457 40 2 E R 1010 1583 0 073 0 638 4 7 A WB L 371 3539 0 677 0 105 32 6 D 19 5 C T 2555 5588 0 897 0 457 20 3 C R 1010 1583 0 374 0 638 5 9 B NB L 402 1770 0 498 0 333 17 0 C 50 0 E T 319 1863 0 426 0 171 25 7 D R 482 1583 1 049 0 305 69 6 F SB L 428 1770 1 026 0 333 61 1 F 47 9 E TR 567 3306 0 459 0 171 25 7 D Intersection Delay = 33 3 sec/veh Intersection LOS D Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 1 032 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4a 04-09-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ======================================================================= Streets (E-W) Gateway Analyst KLF Area Type Other Comment IMPROVEMENTS STAGE 1 (N-S) High Ridge File Name STAGEl RC9 3-26-96 PM Peak ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - - -- - - -- No Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 < Volumes 220 2276 93 250 1980 399 205 139 562 417 65 190 Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 RTOR Vols 16 40 40 22 Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds NB Right * EB Right * SB Right WB Right * Green 8 OA 47 OA Green 12 OA 22 OA Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 Cycle Length 105 secs Phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach Mvrnts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- EB L 303 3539 0 788 0 086 39 2 D 39 2 D T 2555 5588 1 032 0 457 40 2 E R 965 1583 0 084 0 610 5 5 B WB L 303 3539 0 893 0 086 49 4 E 21 3 C T 2555 5588 0 897 0 457 20 3 C R 965 1583 0 392 0 610 6 9 B NB L 328 1770 0 659 0 276 19 3 C 47 3 E T 408 1863 0 358 0 219 22 7 C R 528 1583 1 042 0 333 64 9 F SB L 438 3539 1 032 0 124 71 7 F 56 2 E TR 364 1662 0 673 0 219 27 6 D Intersection Delay = 34 7 sec/veh Intersection LOS D Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 1 036 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4a 04-09-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ==============~======================================================== Streets (E-W) Gateway Analyst KLF Area Type Other Comment IMPROVEMENTS STAGE 2 (N-S) High Ridge File Name STAGE2 HC9 3-26-96 PM Peak ======================================================================= Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - - -- - - -- No Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 < Volumes 220 2276 137 368 1980 399 302 205 827 417 96 190 Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 RTOR Vols 16 40 40 22 Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds NB Right * EB Right * SB Right WB Right * Green 14 OA 54 OA Green 16 OA 20 OA Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 Cycle Length 120 secs phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- EB L 442 3539 0 540 0 125 32 9 D 39 7 D T 2561 5588 1 029 0 458 42 0 E R 989 1583 0 128 0 625 5 9 B WB L 442 3539 0 902 0 125 48 6 E 24 1 C T 2561 5588 0 895 0 458 22 6 C R 989 1583 0 382 0 625 7 3 B NB L 313 1770 1 016 0 308 65 3 F 40 4 E T 326 1863 0 663 0 175 33 3 D R 1029 3167 0 910 0 325 33 6 D SB L 501 3539 0 902 0 142 46 5 E 51 2 E TR 295 1684 0 943 0 175 58 8 E Intersection Delay = 35 1 sec/veh Intersection LOS D Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 1 019 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4a 04-09-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Streets (E-W) Gateway Analyst KLF Area Type Other Comment IMPROVEMENTS STAGE 3 (N-S) High Ridge File Name STAGE3 HC9 3-26-96 PM Peak ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 Volumes 220 2276 164 442 1980 399 362 246 992 417 115 190 Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 '0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 RTOR Vols 16 40 40 22 Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds NB Right * EB Right * SB Right * WB Right * Green 17 5A 48 5A Green 13 OA 15 OA Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 Cycle Length 110 secs Phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- EB L 595 3539 0 402 0 168 26 6 D 43 1 E T 2515 5588 1 048 0 450 46 8 E R 957 1583 0 163 0 605 6 2 B WB L 595 3539 0 805 0 168 33 9 D 22 3 C T 2515 5588 0 911 0 450 22 3 C R 957 1583 0 395 0 605 7 4 B NB L 363 1770 1 050 0 282 75 1 F 62 2 F T 271 1863 0 956 0 145 61 3 F R 1080 3167 1 048 0 341 58 1 E SB L 450 3539 1 004 0 127 64 5 F 47 6 E T 271 1863 0 447 0 145 28 6 D R 540 1583 0 328 0 341 17 5 C Intersection Delay = 39 8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 1 042 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4a 04-09-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ======================================================================= Streets (E-W) Gateway Analyst KLF Area Type Other Comment 25% Growth North of (N-S) High Ridge File Name 25PERCEN HC9 3-26-96 PM Peak Intersection (STAGE 2) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - - -- - - -- No Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 < Volumes 254 2276 103 276 1980 491 226 153 620 624 72 266 Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 RTOR Vols 16 40 40 22 Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * NB Left * * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left * * Thru * Thru * * Right * Right * * Peds Peds NB Right * EB Right * SB Right WB Right * * Green 8 OA 45 OA Green 12 OA 9 OA 10 OP Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 0 0 4 0 Cycle Length 100 secs Phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6 #7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- EB L 319 3539 0 863 0 090 43 5 E 36 9 D T 2570 5588 1 025 0 460 37 3 D R 981 1583 0 093 0 620 4 9 A WB L 319 3539 0 942 0 090 54 9 E 20 3 C T 2570 5588 0 892 0 460 19 2 C R 1124 1583 0 423 0 710 4 0 A NB L 325 1770 0 732 0 260 27 3 D 37 3 D T 205 1863 0 786 0 110 40 1 E R 728 3167 0 947 0 230 40 1 E SB L 779 3539 0 870 0 220 31 7 D 43 3 E TR 330 1648 1 010 0 200 66 8 F Intersection Delay = 31 5 sec/veh Intersection LOS D Lost Time/Cycle, L = 15 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 1 045 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ~ CAR DULKRSRlP TRIP GU11l.ATlOl( DATA JAasomLLr ARE! ------------- PH P~ HOOR --------------___ lroHBtR OP VEHICLE TR IP --VEHICL~ TRIPS--- ---GEXEP~TIO~ RA71--- BUILDIll'G (p~r 1000 g3f) DEALERSHI P LOCATIOK hRD. mER EXIT TO!!!. ~m alT TOTM Pontiac (Kelly) Blanding Blvd 62,000 g3f 53 78 131 o 855 1 258 2 113 Pontiac (Pr~tiq~) Phi 11 ips HIlY 30 000 gsf H H 65 o 800 1 367 167 Plrrouth (River CIty) Cassat Ave 30 300 gsf 20 25 45 0 660 o 825 485 Dodge (lies t.s ld e) Wsat Ave 36 700 gsf 30 49 79 0 817 1 335 153 Pard (Duval) Cassat Ave 86 825 gsf 90 109 199 1 037 1 255 292 Buick (Key) Quality Circl e 62 3.50 gsf 36 69 105 o 577 1 107 1 684 Lincoln-Kercury Quality Circle 34,900 gsf 3~ 70 104 o 914 2 006 2 980 (Korth Florida) Gidi 11 ac Quallty Circle 51 850 qsf 52 71 123 1 003 1 369 2 372 (Claude Kalan) 80nda (Lucas) Rel15 Road 16,650 gat 25 26 51 1 502 1 562 3 063 /fissan (Sunrise) liells Road 2S 775 gsf 57 66 123 2 211 2 561 4 772 Toyota (Sunrise) Phi 11 i ps HIlY 23 100 gsf 38 54 92 1 645 2 338 3 983 8rundai/Suharu Blmding Bl vd 21,800 gst 30 33 63 1 376 1514 2 890 (Sport) SaaJJ/Jagu.ar Atlantic Blvd 19 325 gsf 16 32 {8 o 828 1 656 2 484 (Kathenr I~ort3) Porsche (Brunos) Atlantic Bl vd H 400 gsf 10 16 26 o 694 1 III 1 806 Xercedes-Beru Ulantic Blvd 25,525 gsf 18 28 {6 o 705 1 097 1 802 (Gregg Kotors) T'OT1.L 5<(1 500 gsf 533 767 1 300 o 984 1 H6 2 .1,01 JW BUcrHOLl TRAYYIC ~GlnYRlIG D:C