AGENDA DOCUMENTS
i l JjJ
-j
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission
Meetinl! Dates
o November 17 1998
o December I 1998
o December IS 1998
o January 5 1999
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to CitY Clerk's Office
November 6, 1998 (noon)
December 4 1998 (noon)
Requested City Commission
Meetinl! Dates
o January 19 1999
o February 2, 1999
o February 16, 1999
~ March 2, 1999
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to CitY Clerk s Office
January 8, 1999 (noon)
November 20,1998 (noon)
January 22, 1999 (noon)
February 5 1999 (noon)
December 18. 1998 (noon)
February 19 1999 (noon)
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
o Administrative
o Consent Agenda
~ Public Hearing
o Bids
o Announcement
o Development Plans
o New Business
~ Legal
o Unfmished Business
o Presentation
RECOMMENDA nON Please place the request below on the March 2, 1999 City Commission agenda under Public
Hearing. The Planning and Development Board with a 7-0 vote, recommended approval subject only to the condition that
the lots designated attraction and amusement be limited to a multi-screen movie theater with ancillary uses on site. The
Board opposed the limitations proposed on commercial uses that were recommended by staff. For further details pertaining
to the request see attached Department of Development Memorandum No 99-047
EXPLANA nON
Project: Quantum Corporate Park ORIA
Agent: Eugene A. Gerlica
Mock, Roos and Associates Inc.
Quantum Associates
Quantum Corporate Park
Request to amend the previously approved PIO master plan in connection with an amendment to
the DRI as follows:
Owner'
Location.
Description.
Change the master plan land use designation of lot 2 from office/ industrial to office/industrial/hotel
use, lots 66 67 -A and 67 -C from office/ industrial/hotel to office/industrial/commercial use lots 76
81 and 82 from office/industrial/commercial to office/industrial use, and lots 83 84 85 86 87 and
88 from office/industrial to office/industrial/attraction and recreation (AR) use.
PROGRAM IMP ACT N/ A
FISCAL IMPACT N/A
Acting City Manager Signature
7~ L- '-L-
Acting Manager of Planing and Zoning
City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
IICHIMAlNISHRDA T AIPLANNINGISHAREDIWP\PROJECTS\QUANTUMIDRl\AGENDA lTE:\-1 REQUEST 3-2-99.DOC
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO PZ 99-047
FROM
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
;J'L,c
Michael Rumpf
Acting Manager of Planning and Zoning
TO'
DATE.
February 18, 1999
SUBJECT
Quantum Park - MPMD 98-006/DRIA 98-003
Master Plan Amendment No 9 (movement of land uses and addition of
Amusement and Recreation land use designation)
NATURE OF REQUEST
Quantum Park of Commerce, a partially built-out Development of Regional Impact (DRI)
comprised of 539 9 acres, zoned PID (Planned Industrial Development), is located on the west
side of 1-95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton (C-16) Canal (see attached
location map - Exhibit "A") Douglas MacDonald, President of MFT Development, Inc., property
owner of the Quantum Park of Commerce, has requested an amendment to their DRI
development order, Ordinance No 84-51 as amended by Ordinance No 97-20, 86-11 86-37,
88-3,94-10, 94-51 96-33 and 96-65 The proposed amendments which revise the existing
master plan (see Exhibit "B" - Existing Master Plan) are as follows (with the bold type indicating
the specific category affected)
1) Change in master plan designation of lot 2 from office/industrial to
office/ind ustrial/h otel;
2) Change in the master plan designation of lots 66, 67 -A, and 67 -C from
office/Industrial/hotel to office/industrial/commercial;
3) Change in the master plan designation of lots 76, 81, and 82 to
office/industrial/commercial to office/industrial, and
4) Change in the master plan designation of lots 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, and 88 from
office/industrial to office/industrial/amusement and recreation,
BACKGROUND
The amendment request is governed by Section 7 of Appendix A, Zoning City of Boynton
Beach Code of Ordinances, which establishes Planned Industrial Development Districts and by
Chapter 380 06 (19) (e) (2), Florida Statutes, Developments of Regional Impact - Substantial
Deviations This amendment is submitted in connection with a request from the applicant that:
1) the city make a determination that the master plan amendment is not substantial
in nature and
2) the proposed change to the Quantum Park DRI development order
a) is not a substantial deviation and
b) does not require further Development of Regional Impact review
A public hearing must be conducted by the City Commission prior to making a determination as
/
Quantum Park- MPMD 98-006/DRIA 98-003
Page 2
to whether the proposed change is substantial in nature and whether further development of
regional impact review is required If no further review is required, the City Commission shall
issue an amended development order that, in this instance, requires the passage of an
ordinance which amends the original development order If a determination is made that the
proposed change requires further development of regional impact review the review shall be
conducted only on those aspects of the development order that are required to be changed.
The required public hearing shall receive a fifteen (15) day public notice, following the passage
of thirty (30) days but not more than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the amendment
material3
ANAL YSIS
The purpose of the subject request is described below under each description of change (see
Exhibit C - Proposed Master Plan which highlights the subjects parcels)
Add the new "Amusement and Recreation" cateaorv to lots 83 throuah 88
This is a new category to the PID/DRI and is proposed for all six (6) lots located at the
northwest corner of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road. The total land area for these
lots equals 22 50 acres The original motivation for this change was to create an activity center
comprised of an entertainment use on the subject lots and a retail center opposite these lots on
the south side of Gateway Boulevard The entertainment use was originally to consist of a 20-
screen state-of-the-art Muvico theatre As state DRllaw specifically classifies movie theaters
under the category of "Amusement and Recreation" I the movie theater could not be
accommodated by the existing category of "Commercial" Approximately 2 months ago staff
was informed directly by a representative of Muvico that Muvico was no longer considering
Quantum Park for a theater location. State law lists uses such as movie theaters, stadiums,
and arenas as corresponding to the "Amusement and Recreation" category The current
designation options for these lots include "Office" and "Industrial" The proposed category of
"Amusement and Recreation" would not replace the existing uses, but would supplement them
as an optional use
Add "Commercial" desianation option to lots 66, 67-A, and 67-C and remove "Hotel" option
The addition of the "Commercial" option on these lots (which total 8 acres) essentially
consolidates a total of 21 8 acres (8 lots) of property, located at the southwest corner of
Gateway Boulevard and Park Ridge Boulevard, for a sizable commercial venture As indicated
above a commercial project at this location would be planned in conjunction with the
entertainment project planned for the parcels opposite this cluster of lots The lots located
along Gateway Boulevard (lots 63, 64 65A and 65B) are currently designated with the
commercia'" use designation option and therefore are developable for example for a
commercial retail center The removal of the "Hotel" designation on these lots is proposed as
part of a plan to reduce the sites for hotels to one additional parcel located adjacent to the
existing Hampton Inn (see following description)
Add "Hotel" option to lot 2
As described above, the "Hotel" option is to be removed from the three lots described in the
preceding description and added to the 3 68-acre lot 2 Lot 2 is directly north of lot 1 which is
the site of the Hampton Inn Staff understands that MFT desires to reduce hotel uses in the
,/'
d
Quantum Park- MPMD 98-006/DRIA 98-003
Page 3
park, and attempt to limit hotels to those compatible with, rather than competitive with, the
existing Hampton Inn The master plan allows hotels on sites with the "Commercial"
designation, however, staff understands that MFT does not want to promote a competitive
environment and may therefore not market hotels for the commercially-designated parcels
Remove "Commercial" desianation on lots 76.81,82
This removal of the commercial class on the above-referenced lots located along the east
boundary of the park is in part, to off set the impacts projected from the addition of the
Amusement and Recreation" category This change is also consistent with a restriction (e g
deed) previously placed on these lots that excludes them commercial use
The proposed changes have been reviewed against the following issues.
1 Does the redistribution/redesignation of land use result in a change in concept
for the Quantum Park of Commerce or the ability of the Park to develop in a
quality manner?
2. What impact will the land use redistribution/redesignation have on projected
expenditures which will be spent within the region, on projected city-wide land
use distribution?
3 Does the impact of the land use redistribution/redesignation result in a conflict
with the number, type and payroll level of jobs projected in Quantum Park's
Application for Development Approval (ADA)?
4 What impact will the land use redistribution/redesignation have on adjacent
property?
5 Will there be an increase in traffic resulting from the land use
redistribution/redesignation?
Regarding issue number one above, during the review of the last several changes to the
Quantum Park PID/DRI, staff has emphasized the potential loss of parcels designated for
"Industrial" use This conversion began with the accommodation for the planned high school,
which removed approximately 40 adjacent acres (12 parcels) from the industrial class, and
included the conversion of several parcels from "Industrial" or "Office" to "Commercial" for the
Carmax project. The subject change would result in a net loss of approximately 10 acres
strictly designated for "Industrial" or "Office" Of more significance than total acreage is the
location, access, and concentration of the subject parcels The properties to be enhanced with
the new recreation category are adjoining and capable of accommodating a large
manufacturing facility or perhaps a campus of smaller and related industrial or research
facilities In contrast, the parcels that are to lose the commercial options (therefore increasing
industrial potential) consist of three separate parcels which only total 3 acres (lot 76) and 10
acres (lots 81 and 82 combined) Without this concentration of lots available for industrial uses
there only exists one other location within the park capable of accommodating a large industrial
facility, and are the parcels where BGI was planned (lots 32 through 38) It is noteworthy that
/'
,/.
.....J
Quantum Park- MPMD 98-006/DRIA 98-003
Page 4
the removal of the "Commercial" option on lots 76, 81 and 82 'is consistent with staff comments
generated during the previous amendment that voiced opposition toward commercial land uses
on properties adjacent to 1-95
The second and third issues relate to fiscal impacts, the economy and land use distribution
The following statements summarize the review from these economic and land use
perspectives
1) It is anticipated that the proposed master plan changes will have no effect on the projected
expenditures which would be spent within the region (excluding city impacts) Regarding
issue three above, it is believed that the proposed master plan changes will have an effect
on the number, type and payroll level of jobs projected in Quantum Park's original
application for Development Approval (ADA) The pay range for service sector jobs is
smaller and industrial acreage provides a greater number of jobs than commercial
acreage Job salaries are, in turn, linked to home prices. Attracting higher priced
residential developments was a Visions 20/20 objective.
2) Adding the option for commercial uses on lots along Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge
Road will further impact the type of commercial ventures interested in locating in Quantum
Park. This shift will attract commercial uses such as service stations, fast food
restaurants, oil change garages, and strip commercial that will be interested in the close
proximity to 1-95 and the planned entertainment complex (theater), and could relate very
little to the planned industrial park (there is currently the plan for locating a Mobile gas
station/convenience store at the southwest comer of Gateway Boulevard and Park Ridge
Boulevard)
3) The subject change represents a further increase in land av~ilable for commercial uses,
which further increases the anticipated surplus of such lands as projected in the
Comprehensive Plan for the build-out period Comprehensive Plan data included the
projection that at build-out, there would exist the greatest surplus of land in the category of
"commercial" This surplus was projected to exceed 190 acres at build-out, and
considering that this data originally included 30 acres of commercial lands within the
Quantum Park PID, this subject increase in commercial (amusement and recreation)
lands, and decrease in hotel and commercial lands, would result in a revised total of 42
acres of commercial land within Quantum Park. This increase pushes the total anticipated
surplus to over 240 acres.
4) As stated in the zoning code, "The purpose of the PID district is to provide a zoning
classification for light industrial development that will better satisfy current demands for
light industrial zoned lands by encouraging development which will reflect chanoes in the
technoloav of land development and relate the development of land to the specific site and
to conserve natural amenities" The increased option of commercial space causes a shift
in the image of the PID especially as viewed from the 1-95 interchange, one of the major
gateways to the city This shift has no connection to any change in industrial technology
and the demand for industrial land Rather than creating unique opportunities for
4
Quantum Park- MPMD 98-006/DRIA 98-003
Page 5
development not provided elsewhere in the city, the shift competes with other areas of the
city
With respect to item #4, the impact on adjacent property is best evaluated by considering the
potential impacts of increased commercial activity in the park upon other commercial uses
within the city In the vicinity of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road west of
Congress Avenue alone there is already 500 000 square feet of commercial square footage
approved, undeveloped and vested since 1990 (including Boynton Commons) These
approvals as well as the Visions 20/20 commercial revitalization efforts planned for Federal
Highway, will be competing with the prime visibility, high traffic commercial lots proposed in
Quantum Park, due to the type of commercial uses that could be interested in locating in
Quantum Park. Since the demand for commercial land use is finite, some existing commercial
uses within the city may migrate to Quantum Park.
Regarding issue 5 (traffic), the city does not have a traffic engineer or traffic planner on board and
does not budget for outside review of submitted traffic studies, therefore the city relies on the
regional planning council's (RPC) and the state's review of Quantum Park's traffic data Neither
the RPC, nor Palm Beach County, had sufficient time to review the traffic engineer's response
prior to the writing of this report. The original traffic data submitted only establishes conversion
rates for the entertainment complex. Staff has requested that the data be enhanced to verify that
the proposed changes do not increase measurable traffic volumes above that currently
anticipated, and to show the current and anticipated traffic totals for comparison with the vested
total. Since traffic impacts are criteria for reviewing DRI amendments, the city should be able to
rely on the RPC to closely review this data for possible impacts that would be deemed
"substantial" to the DRI The amendment could not continue without a more thorough review if
impacts exceeded thresholds established in state law The applicant has attempted to balance
this application so as to generate no net increases in DRI impacts.
CONCLUSIONS
Over the past few years, there has been increasing interest in locating manufacturing uses within
Quantum Park. In recognition of the city's need to attract research and development and light
industrial uses to diversify its economic base, the city aggressively pursued BGI to locate in
Quantum Park. The city also identified economic development as one of its visioning goals.
Towards that end economic incentive program for Quantum Park was to be adopted applicable to
developments bringing in a certain number of jobs. The jobs however, also needed to pay a
certain minimum salary Also, as one of the city's recently adopted "quick victory" visioning
projects a formal marketing program was planned to be developed. (As a point of interest, it was
stated in the staff analysis of a previous amendment that Boca Raton was processing a DRI for
the vacant IBM building and 500 acres in the vicinity for a 5 million square foot light industrial park!
This action signals further competition, and indicates a strong market at this time for light
industrial uses)
With the RPC and the state evaluating the proposed changes for DRI impacts, city staff has
focused on the both the change in character of the PID and impacts on city-wide commercial uses
generated by competition and the opportunity costs of excess land designated for commercial
uses. If the ultimate commercial uses were unique to the area, therefore eliminating the
f
--'
Quantum Park- MPMD 98-006/DRIA 98-003
Page 6
competitive impacts, staff acknowledges the potential for the proposed uses to represent a unique
entertainment complex with regional attraction potential However, to ensure this scenario, staff
recommends the following:
1) The entertainment or recreation uses be unique to the city so as to avoid negative impacts
on existing commercial uses (a theater could be unique based on additional internal
amenities, participation costs, design, etc.),
2) To avoid strip or small commercial activities on the lots at the southwest comer of
Gateway and Park Ridge Boulevard, these lots should be developed as a single complex
or consolidated activity center with an emphasis on uses unique to the city and therefore
would compete less with existing commercial uses within the city.
3) "Commercial" options be further reduced on lots within the Quantum Park PID (the only
remaining parcel with the commercial use option is lot 91, which consists of 653 acres at
the northeast comer of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road) The "Commercial"
designation option could be removed, or alternatively, the parcel could be limited to uses
unique to the city's commercial activity center located along Congress Avenue in the
vicinity of the Boynton Beach Mall (including hotels or similar uses), and complementary to
the other non-industrial uses planned at the northwest and southwest comers of this
intersection,
4) As an additional option to conditions #1 and #3, the applicant should justify commercial
demand for these parcels through a corresponding analysis of needs and supply for the
commercial uses proposed at that time. This analysis should not only include respective
marketing information but an analysis of land use distribution which essentially updates
and corrects that data found in the Comprehensive Plan, and
5) Remove office" option from lots 32 through 38 and exclude uses that are principally
warehouses. The use approval process shall be the means of reviewing for exceptions.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that this request to amend the Quantum Park PID master plan as described
herein be approved, subject to those conditions describe above and intended to address conflicts
staff has raised with this request relative to the concern for promoting Quantum Park as an
industrial park, and desire to preserve existing commercial uses and maximize the balance
between the different land uses (see Exhibit 'D" - Conditions of Approval) This recommendation
includes the recommendation that the proposed change to the master plan be considered non-
substantial"
Furthermore pursuant to Florida Statutes, Chapter 380 06(19) Substantial Deviations, the
applicant has attempted to justify that this proposed amendment does not constitute a
substantial deviation to the DRI, pursuant specifically to paragraph (e)(3) (a change not
specifically classified elsewhere under state law) Under (e)(3) changes, the applicant must
provide "clear and convincing evidence" supporting that his requested changes do not
(
, 7
~
----. -~---~--------------
Quantum Park- MPMD 98-006/DRlA 98-003
Page 7
constitute a substantial deviation. Based on current comments from the RPC and state, the
applicant must provide additional information.
This recommendation is also contingent upon the ultimate finding of non-substantial change by
the RPC and state, and satisfying any conditions from these additional reviewers.
MR
Attachments
xc: Applicant
Central File
S \Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\DRI - MFT\QuantumDRIA Staff Rep doc
1
LU\.jAl,UN MAt-' cl'nll..... ·
,NO USE OES\GNAT\ON CHANGES
. .
III" \\ llr. I
I' ~, 1\
-:,:....--
~J ;1
HOT
,'"
C , T"'"
.t 1V1'\
~~.t\\I- )-
,. .
~, .. - -
\.-' - .~
l-l4\ In.
r.,... '1 ~
-'1",'
~
I ~ il ~.1 11:?' - & I
\ (j),~:Gf!e eL~~.t= I ·
\ _ rli:J.dt ;:. ';:l
1''5' ,-;:~ I r;. Fe bli 2
1 ~ =- nil. .,r:~::' "..j.~
~~. 7'" reJ 'I .ll:: it! ;~\
:' I'" 7 (l... ,..,./ 11-1' -...
.~ ~-
t; e I" ",1....- '- I-- l! ,I J
fl.' :.17 j '/
J\ ~~\&r~~:I'I,S---' '... : ""
~, C \\ jfl~ ~~ --- "" ~
f' 'I ' ;' -;y l'
',~) \C3~: .' .: '-' ~. ,)
/ I ,..' .
- ,'~ " '
. ' " ,'..J. ....j.... : .",.." ..
t::J . , : "". ,;., ~ t\ / . '. .....~
I :,' " ..'\. ' . -"
.-- ,,, ' ..' ' 'l\' )
-, . . ~ ._~ ,- " ..
..:::..-- _ ,_---. 1
r- \ I: '.....--- en- ~., '1-.
\ \ I; ~ /' " ., '. ~v.' ,~7
, , .' ' . ' . '
~. \. :' Ill.... .. '
.-r ",,' .': C'fN'TC)~..:~-::,~b,",
\ -:-:=:=:_ ~ -.. K 0 F CO 1\111\11 e Fl........
f '; ,,'uAN"t'UI\ll PAFlKl
~ p,O ,~.~-
'~ ..I\IIO"t'OFloLA: 'rA ~I
fL ,4/ -:.~
~ 1,~ ~
7 I~ I ~
\
..... "f
~
\
LordS
1
Q-,
~
ee
CJ~
l.Df 82 I
I,
I
lDf 8 -A
· I
\.,OT&1 I
LOT -c
-
l
I i1
I
~ I '~
~
[j
~fIl" ~~-
l
'II %,
~)i
... \ V n I
-
;:
-c:::::::
oj
..
""'~ r im1
_ j r 11 ~~
M\LES~~
FEET~ ~
. . ,A
\\\\\\fi- - \ ~
~
~~
~
\~
--c~
":::l
~~,
:,.\
__"l:\
{
~'lAA
~--~--_.-------------
EXHIBIT "B'
-~.~-~
--
. ..
"r.'
[J
'!l'
-
~..
n
--,.,
/f I~ .1 E
.-\.
:'.
'oA. .=)
i -
...
~ . ~-
I ....
i .....
\
...... - -. ....
IMSO IIIoSrtI I'LUI
AutlCOlltlfJ 110. ,
....y ZOo 1117
i.a-=:.~'l=-=--:'
........ - ...- - - --- --- - -..
~-er-.a:--:.z..~::'T,,-=- .....
&;" .:.cr,,",,-=--=-_
:t ==:.-....&: =:::1." ~ ....
----....-....----
0-
MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
LEGEND
;.... L~
f.__'
i
KEY PLAN
--
.... _ IUO_
-_I _M_
'''1(1 .....,... 1') ........
o c..... .......
CI(__~ '.7.1.._
a t__~) ~14.....
...C__ U'_
...... ... ...
..... .... ..... .. ....
___ .1. II .....
.....,......
Q QUAHTUW ASSOCIATES
Notlonol C Conlor
lIS W.., \trOth'n;ton 51.
Indlanapallt. IN 48Z04
(317) US-l6DD
~-==J
.-
-~---~-~-------~ ---~-~~--
~
i n\ht\\\\ '\1\ ~
\ "'1-'
. ! U\I~~\\\~ t\i
i n,~~b:l\ I
i ~~\I\li;\1 I~
\ \ii\\ ,I .~ ii\ \ \
~ ,1_\ n ,. &
~,' ~'\ \~
II 1 ,. , .d
I I H
"
I
;
l
\~~
l~ i'
:i~
I:
~
...
.....
~;D
"2~1t!
~6~
Coo
:. 'i '2
-f"
....
.%~
~91:
.0.....
3
"1l
~
EXH\B\ \ "\..1
----~
--------- \
~
'f----
\
\
\
\
\
,
- ! " ~ q ~ :. ~ : ~ '" ,
' .Ii~"--'!"'-
l nUl 'HHn\\
5" . -""t- lj!
i · 1 H s-~
~l 1--0.
.ii~ i
nl ;
~ " 5
1::'~ I
~ -
II .='~i;ll; i ,
! .I_II;:.~I'C i =
,,'~l!~~~~~~ 1 ;
\ ... <#0"'. "".. 'i !
I l
5
~ ~
... a
i %
J
"1l ~
~ ....
" .~
g
\ \
-
~Jf. .. I \ \ ,
'-"
l \ , i'
rt" JIll U'ttar:" , , I
- ..... ..
..
Vi
I~
---
---------
EXHIBIT "D"
ConditIOns of Approval
Project name. Quantum Park PID DRIA
FIle number' MPMD 98-006/ DRIA 98-003
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments. None
UTILITIES
Comments. None
FIRE
Comments. None
POLICE
Comments. None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments. None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments. None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments. None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments.
1 The uses proposed for the lots designated for the "Amusement and X
RecreatIon" optIon be unIque to the Ctty so as to aVOld negatIve
competItIve Impacts on eXIstmg commercIal uses (a theater could be
unIque based on addItIonal mternal amemties, particIpatIOn costs, design,
etc )
2 To aVOld strIp or small commercial uses on lots located at the southwest X
corner of Gateway Boulevard and Park Ridge Boulevard, these lots
(minImIzing outparcel(s)) should be developed as a smgle complex or
consolidated actIvity center WIth an emphaSIS on uses unIque to the CIty,
whIch would therefore not compete with eXIsting commercIal uses
within the comrnercial actIvIty center along Congress Avenue. ThIS
Page 2
File Name. Quantum Corporate Park - DR! Amendment
File No MPMD 98-006 / DRIA 98-003
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
lImitation excludes the planned Mobil station/convenience store on lot
65-B, and includes uses such as drug store retailers, auto parts or repair,
other convenience stores, copy centers, etc. The use approval process
shall be the means to review future uses for determination of complIance
with this conditIOn.
X
3 "Commercial" optIOns be further reduced on lots with10 the Quantum
Park PID (the only rema1010g parcel With the commercial use option IS
lot 91, which consists of 6.53 acres at the northeast corner of Gateway
Boulevard and High Ridge Road). The "Commercial" designation
option could be removed, or alternatively, the parcel could be limited to
uses unique to the City'S commercial activity center located along
Congress Avenue 10 the vlc10lty of the Boynton Beach (including hotels
or Similar uses)
X
4 As an additIOnal option to conditions # 1 and #2, the applIcant should
JUStify, at the site plan stage, commercial use and demand for these
parcels through a corresponding analYSIS of needs and supply for the
commercial uses proposed at that time. This analYSIS should not only
10clude respective marketing informatIOn but an analYSIS of land use
distribution which essentially updates and corrects that data found In the
ComprehenSive Plan.
X
5 Find10g of non-substantial change by the RPC and state, and satisfying
any conditions from these additional reviewers.
X
6 Remove "office" option from lots 32 through 38, and exclude uses that
are prIncipally warehouses. The use approval process shall be the means
of reVieWIng for exceptIOns.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
7 The lots deSignated attraction and amusement be limited to a multl- X
screen rnovle theater With anCillary uses on site
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
8 To be determ1Oed.
J\SHRDA T A\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\DRl - Mm I ST REVIEW COMMENTS-DRl.doc
!bme
-----------
-~---------
DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT NAME. Quantum Park PID DRIA
APPLICANT'S AGENT Eugene A. Gerlica, P E., Mock, Roos and. Associates, Inc.
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 5720 Corporate Way, West Palm Beach, Florida 33407-2066
DATE OF HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION March 2,1999
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT Master Plan Modification with amendment to DRI
LOCATION OF PROPERTY Quantum Corporate Park
DRAWING(S) SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO
THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows.
OR
X THIS MA TIER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows.
1 Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
...lL HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3 The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "0" with notation "Included"
4 The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
...lL GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof
DENIED
5 This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6 All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order
7 Other
DATED'
City Clerk
\\CH\MAIN\SHRDA T A\Planning\SHAREo\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\DRI - MFT\Develop.Order Form.doc
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
December 4, 1998 (noon)
Requested City Commission
\1eeting Dates
o January 19 1999
o February 2, 1999
[gj February 16, 1999
o March 2, 1999
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
January 8, 1999 (noon)
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
o November 17 1998
o December I 1998
o December 15 1998
o January 5 1999
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to CitY Clerk s Office
November 6. 1998 (noon)
November 20, 1998 (noon)
January 22, 1999 (noon)
February 5 1999 (noon)
December 18. 1998 (noon)
February 19 1999 (noon)
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
o Administrative
o Consent Agenda
~ Public Hearing
o Bids
o Announcement
o Development Plans
o New Business
~ Legal
o Unfinished Business
o Presentation
RECOMMENDATION Please maintain the request through to the March 2, 1999 City Commission agenda
under Public Hearing and Legal, Ordinance - 2nd Reading As you may recall, the Commission approved the first
reading of the ordinance at the February 2, 1999 meeting and approved the request to postpone the public hearing
for this request until March 2nd The purpose for this delay is to provide additional time to review and process this
NOPC to the Quantum Corporate Park DRI which time was originally lost when the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council delayed the review period due to reasons connected to application processing
EXPLANATION
Project: Quantum Corporate Park DRIA
Agent: Eugene A. Gerlica
Mock, Roos and Associates, Inc.
Quantum Associates
Quantum Corporate Park
Request approval to modify the approved master plan land use designation of lots 2, 66 67 -A, 67-
C 76 81 82,83 84 85 86 87 and 88
Owner
Location.
Description
PROGRAM IMPACT N/A
FISCAL IMPACT N/ A
ALTERNATIVES. N/A
City Manager's Signature
D
~?--k V7___
Acting Manager o~laning and Zoning
City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
\\CHlMAlN\SHRDAT A\PLAW<tNG\SHARED\WPIpROlECTS\QL'MltJM\DRI'AGE~A ITEM REQUEST 2-16-99 DOC
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission
Meetinl! Dates
o November 17 1998
o December 1 1998
o December 15,1998
o January 5, 1999
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to CitY Clerk's Office
November 6, 1998 (noon)
December 4, 1998 (noon)
Requested City Commission
Meetinl! Dates
o January 19 1999
~ February 2,1999
o February 16, 1999
o March 2, 1999
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to CitY Clerk's Office
January 8, 1999 (noon)
November 20, 1998 (noon)
January 22,1999 (noon)
February 5, 1999 (noon)
December 18, 1998 (noon)
February 19 1999 (noon)
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
o Administrative
o Consent Agenda
~ Public Hearing
o Bids
o Announcement
o Development Plans
o New Business
~ Legal
o Unfmished Business
o Presentation
RECOMMENDATION
Please maintain the request through to the March 2, 1999 City Commission agenda under Public Hearing and
Legal, Ordinance - 1 sl Reading. The purpose for this delay is to provide additional time to review and process this
NOPC to the Quantum Corporate Park, which time was originally lost when the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council delayed the review period due to reasons connected to application processing.
EXPLANATION
Project: Quantum Corporate Park DRIA
Agent: Eugene A. Gerlica
Mock, Roos and Associates, Inc.
Quantum Associates
Quantum Corporate Park
Request approval to modify the approved master plan land use designation of lots 2,66, 67-A, 67-
C 76 81 82,83,84 85,86 87 and 88.
Owner'
Location.
Description.
PROGRAM IMPACT N/A
FISCAL IMPACT N/A
ALTERNATIVES: N/A
Department of Development Director's Signature
City Manager's Signature
/
I I 1 ~ /
/}'/~ (' l,7...- ~ Kaftt y' H LIV
Acting Manager Of~ ' ing and Zoning
City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
\\CH\MAIN\SHRDA T A\PLANNlNG\SHAREDlWP\PROJECTSIQUANTUMIDRl\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST 2-2-99.DOC
REQUEST FOR PUBLISHING
LEGAL NOTICES AND/OR LEGAL ADVERTISEMENTS
A completed copy of this routing slip must accompany any request to have a Legal Notice or
Legal Advertisement published and must be submitted to the Office of the City Attorney eight
(8) working days prior to the first publishing date requested below
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planninq and Zoninq Division
PREPARED BY Michael W. Rumpf
DATE PREPARED January 6, 1999
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NOTICE OR AD' Quantum Park notice of proposed chanqe to the
DRI development order to chanQe the master plan land use desiqnation of lots 2, 66, 67-A, 67-
C, 76, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 and 88.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS (Size of Headline Type Size, Section
Placement, Black Border etc.)
Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 (19) (f) of Florida Statues, there appears to be no special
requirements.
SEND COPIES OF AD TO' Planninq & Zoninq Division, Quantum Associates, Aqent Euqene
A. Gerlica, Mock, Roos and Assocites, Inc., Newspaper, City Attorney
NEWSPAPER(S) TO PUBLISH The Post (newspaper of qeneral circulation), since this is a
proiect of reqional impact.
DA TE(S) TO BE PUBLISHED Minimum once, 15 days prior to public hearinQ date of February
2, 1999, Le. January 18, 1999.
APPROVED BY
(1) A-&. f~
(Division Head)
/ ;j~1 fl?
(Date) .
(2)
(City Attorney)
(Date)
RECEIVED BY CITY CLERK.
COMPLETED'
s \proJects\quantum\legal notices\legal-DRI
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Commission of THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, will conduct a Public Hearing at 7 00 P M or as soon thereafter as the agenda
permits on Tuesday February 2 1999 in the City Hall Commission Chambers 100 East
Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida The purpose of this public hearing is to
consider a proposed change to the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Development Order
(Ordinance No 84-51) as amended by Ordinances Nos 86-11,86-37 88-3,94-10,94-51,96-
33, 96-65 and 97-20 and determination as to whether or not the proposed change constitutes a
substantial deviation to the approved development order with respect to the property described
below located within the corporate limits of said City pursuant to the request of the parties in
interest and in compliance with Chapter 380 Florida Statutes
REQUEST Notice of Proposed Change
QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH DRI
Formerly Boynton Beach Park of Commerce
Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A Tract of land lying partially in Sections 16, 17 20 and 21, Township 45
South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, said Tract being
more particularly described as follows Commencing at the Southwest
corner of said Section 17, thence North 1 E44'39" East, along the West
line of Section 17, a distance of 1318 10 feet to a point in the intersection
with the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, as recorded in 0 R. Book 1738,
Page 1686, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, thence
with a bearing of North 89E04'32" East, along the centerline of N W 22nd
Avenue a distance of 778 37 feet to the Point of Beginning, thence North
1 E44'39" East, a distance of 1247 06 feet to the South right of way line of
L.W D D Lateral 21, thence North 89E08'49" East along the South right
of way line L.W D D Lateral 21, as recorded in 0 R. Book 1732 Page
612, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, a distance of
63593 feet to the centerline of the L.W D D Equalizing Canal E-4, as
recorded in 0 R. Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public Records of Palm
Beach County, Florida, thence along the centerline of the above
described E-4 Canal with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of
North 10E32'52" East, a radius of 750 00 feet, a central angle of
4E04'17", and an arc length of 5329 feet; thence continue along the
centerline of the E-4 Canal, with a bearing of North 12E35'OO" East, a
distance of 320 69 feet to a point of curve, thence with a curve to the left
having a radius of 650000, a central angle of 3E28'30", and an arc length
of 394 23 feet; thence North 9E06'30" East, a distance of 1979 16 feet to
a point on the North Line of Section 17, thence with a bearing of North
89E16'39" East, along the North line of Section 17, a distance of 1964 50
feet; thence South OE02'11" East, a distance of 2625 18 feet; thence
North 89E08'49" East, a distance of 36896 feet to a point on the North
right of way line of N W 22nd Avenue as recorded in 0 R. Book 1738,
Page 1686 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, thence
South 19E27'31" East, a distance of 50 00 feet to the centerline of N W
22nd Avenue, thence with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of
Page 2
Quantum Park - Notice of Public Hearing
North 75E29'49" East, a radius of 163702 feet, a central angle of
9E53'58", and an arc length of 282 85 feet to a point; thence north
12E02'41" East, a distance of 915 72 feet; thence NorthOE31'11" East, a
distance of 399 70 feet; thence North 89E 12'37" East, a distance of
413 21 feet; thence South 88E22'56" East, a distance of 1349 70 feet to
a point on the West right of way line of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad
thence South OE28'21" East, along the West right of way line of the
Railroad, a distance of 1309 09 feet to a point on the centerline of N W
22nd Avenue, thence North 88E27'31" West, along the centerline of N W
22nd Avenue a distance of 67297 feet; thence South OE33'53" East, a
distance of 1306 69 feet; thence South 88E45'31" East, a distance of
333 51 feet to a point on the West right of way of the Seaboard Coastline
Railroad, thence with a bearing of South 14E08'23" West, along the West
right of way of the railroad a distance of 1312 49 feet; thence South
OE33'53" East, a distance of 2669 feet; thence South 13E15'22" West, a
distance of 920 57 feet; thence North 88E50'04" West, a distance of
187 60 feet; thence with a bearing North OE49'21" West, a distance of
200 00 feet; thence North 88E50'04" West, a distance of 218 00 feet;
thence South OE49'21" East, a distance of 200 00 feet; thence North
88E50'04" West, a distance of 40 00 feet; thence South OE49'21" East, a
distance of 556 84 feet; thence North 88E50'04" West, a distance of
3617 26 feet to a point on the centerline of the above described
centerline of the E-4 Canal, thence with a bearing of North 5E18'14"
West, a distance of 153 13 feet, thence with a curve to the right having a
radius of 450 00 feet, a central angle of 15E36'44" and an arc length of
122.62 feet; thence North 1 OE 18'30" East, a distance of 988 60 feet to a
point of curve thence with a curve to the left having a radius of 450 00
feet, a central angle of 18E20'00", and an arc length of 143 99 feet;
thence with a bearing of North 8E01'30" West, a distance of 1255 14
feet to a point on the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, thence with a
bearing of South 89E04'32" West, along the centerline of N W 22nd
Avenue a distance of 81785 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning
Containing 591 55 acres more or less and subject to easements and
rights of way of record
539 85 AC
GROSS LAND AREA OF QUANTUM PARK
LESS ROADWAY & CANAL
RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD
NET LAND AREA OF QUANTUM PARK
591 55 AC
51 70 AC
Together with the addition of all land (lots 80 81 and 82) lying within the
plat of the P C D Center, containing 13 17 acres, as recorded in Plat
Book 60, Pages 106 and 107, of the Public Records of Palm Beach
County, Florida, for a total proposed net land area of 55302 acres.
PROPOSED
CHANGES 1 )
Change in the master plan designation of lot 2 from office!
industrial to office/industrial/hotel use,
Page 3
Quantum Park - Notice of Public Hearing
2) Change in the master plan designation of lots 66, 67 -A and 67-C
from office/industrial/hotel to office/industrial/commercial use,
3) Change in the master plan designation of lots 76, 81 and 82 from
office/industrial/commercial to office/industrial use,
4) Change in the master plan designation of lots 83, 84, 85, 86, 87
and 88 from office/industrial to office/industrial/amusement and
recreation (AR) use
APPLICANT Quantum Associates
AGENT
James G Willard, Esquire
Shutts & Bowen
All interested parties are notified to appear at said hearing in person or by attorney and be
heard Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the City Commission with respect to
any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such
purpose may need to el"lsure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
(561)742-6260
PUBLISH
The Post
January 18, 1999
s \projects\quantum\legal notices\legal-DRI-1999