AGENDA DOCUMENTS
j
. __ .11
CIT"Y OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meetine: Dates in to City Manae:er's Office Meeting Dates in to CitY Manae:er's Office
0 May 6, 1997 ApriI25,1997(noon) 0 July 1, 1997 June 20, 1997 (noon)
0 May 20, 1997 May 9 1997 (noon) 0 July 15, 1997 July 3, 1997 (Thursday noon)
I2l June 3,1997 May 23, 1997 (noon) 0 August 5, 1997 July 25. 1997 (noon)
o June 17 1997 June 6, 1997 (noon) 0 August 19 1997 August 8, 1997 (noon)
RECOMMENDA TION Please place the request below on the June 3, 1997 City Commission meeting under Legal,
Ordinances, Second Reading for approval as written.
EXPLANA TION
An ordinance amending the Quantum Park DR! development order was approved on fIrst reading at the May 20 1997 City
Commission meeting with revisions. The revisions have been incorporated in the attached ordinance. The DR! amendment
application, necessitating this ordinance, was submitted by James Willard on behalf of Quantum Associates to request the
following master plan changes in lot use (this list reflects the commercial, industrial and Quantum Boulevard adjustments to
the application Mr Willard requested at the last City Commission meeting): Change in the master plan designation oflots 6,
7,8,9,10 11 2, 15, 16, 17 18, 19,21,39 40A, 52, 83, 84, and 85 from office to office/industrial use; change in the master
plan designation of lot I from office/botel use to office/industriaVcommercial use; change in the master plan designation of
lots 12, 13 and 14 from office/research and development to office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of
lots 76,81 and 82 from industriaVcommercial to office/industriaV commercial use; change in the master plan designation of
lot 40 from office/government and institutional to government and institutional use; change in the master plan designation of
lots 58, 59 60 61 and 62 from industriaVresearch and development to office/industrial use; change in the master plan
designation of lots 86 87 88, 89A, 89B and 90B from research and development to office/industrial use; change in the
master plan designation of lots 65A, 65B, 67B and 91 from office/hoteVcommercial to office/industriaVcommercial use;
change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 from offIce/commercial to office/industriaVcommercial use; change
in the master plan designation of lot 90A from research and development to government and institutional use; change In the
master plan designation of lots 68A and 68B from research and development to office/industrial use; change in the master
plan designation of lots 46A, 48A, 48B, 48C, 50A, 50B, SIB, SID 56,57,69,70, 72, 73A, 73B, 74 and 75 from industrial
to office/industrial use. change in the master plan designatIon of lots 77 78, 79 and 80 from industriaVcommercml to
commercial use and change In the master plan designation of lots 66, 67 A and 67C from office/botel use to
offIce/hoteVindustrial use,
PROGRAM IMPACT N/ A
FISCAL IMPACT N/ A
ALTERNATIVES. N/ A
S ,Planning\SHARED\WP\AGENDAS\CIITCOMM\Agenda Item Request Ordinance Quantum DRl.doc
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Department Head's Signature
City Manager's Signature
Development Services
Department Name
~ ~
-..::::~'-n-L-lL.~ b{
Planning and Zonin
S .Planning\SHARED\ WP\AGENDAS\CITYCOMM\Agenda Item Request Ordinance Quantum DRl.doc
..
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meetinl! Dates in to City Manal!er s Oftice Meetinl! Dates in to City Manal!er's Office
o May 6,1997 April 25 1997 (noon) 0 July I 1997 June 20, 1997 (noon)
IZI May 20, 1997 May 9 1997 (noon) 0 July 15 1997 July 3 1997 (Thursday noon)
o June 3,1997 May 23, 1997 (noon) 0 August 5 1997 July 25 1997 (noon)
o June 17 1997 June 6, 1997 (noon) 0 August 19 1997 August 8, 1997 (noon)
RECOMMENDATION Please place the request below on the May 20, 1997 City Commission meeting under Public
Hearing. The Planning and Development Board, with a 6-1 vote, recommends approval of the Quantum Park DRI
amendment and master plan modification, subject to all staff comments in Exhibit "F" - Conditions of Approval with the
exception of comments 7,8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17 and 19 and revisions to comments 1 and 16 relative to incomplete utility
system analysis and deleting commercial use on various lots.
Regarding comment 8 (lack of maintenance of the sand pine preserve and other landscape areas), staff agrees to delete this
comment and will refer this lack of compliance to Code Enforcement. Regarding comments 9-13 (traffic), staff has received
the attached rebuttal from the RPC They area holding fast to comments 9-13, therefore staff recommends that they not be
deleted. Regarding comments 16 and 19 (commercial use option on additional lots ), staff strongly maintains that no
additional commercial lots be allowed. Regarding comment 19 staff agrees to delete this comment and add it as a condition
of future site plan approval for industrial lots along Gateway
Lastly, an ordinance is scheduled for first reading at the May 20th City Commission meeting as well, which is necessary to
amend the Quantum Park DRI development order The recommended conditions of approval are inserted in the ordinance
and are recommended for approval. For further details pertaining to this request, see attached Planning and Zoning
Department Memorandum No. 97-213
EXPLANA TlON
Project: Quantum Park PID
Agent: James G Willard and Bowen LLP
Owner. Quantum Associates
Location West side of the intersection of Interstate 95 and Gateway Boulevard
DESCRIPTION Request to amend the previously approved PID master plan in connection with an amendment to the DRI
as follows.
Change in traffic distribution due to possible future severing of Quantum Boulevard between lots 22 and 31 and lots 6
through 11, and change in the master plan designation of lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 22, 23 24 25,26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31,2, 3, 15,
16 and 40A from office to office/industrial use; of lots 1, 66, 67 A and 67C from office/hotel use to office/industrial/
commercial use; of lots 12, 13 and 14 from office/research and development to office use; lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37
and 38 from office/industrial to industrial use, of lots 17 18, 19 21 39 52, 81 82, 83, 84 and 85 from office to
office/industrial/ commercial use; of lot 40 from office/government and institutional to government and institutional use;
change in the master plan designation of lots 58, 59, 60, 61and 62 from industrial/research and development to
office/industrial use, change in the master plan designation of lots 86, 87, 88, 89A, 89B and 90B from research and
development to office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 65A, 65B, 67B and 91 from
office/hotel/commercial to office/industrial/commercial use, change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 from
office/commercial to office/industrial/ commercial use, change in the master plan designation of lot 90A from research and
development to government and institutional use; change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 68B from research
and development to office/industrial/ commercial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 56, 57, 69, 70, 72, 73A,
S'\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
..
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
73B, 74 and 75 from industrial to office/industrial/commercial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 46A, 48A,
48B, 48C, 50A, 50B, 5IB and 51 D from industrial to office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 76
77, 78 and 79 from industrial/commercial to commercial use, and change in the master plan designation of lot 80 from office
to commercial use.
PROGRAM IMPACT
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT
N/A
ALTERNATIVES.
N/A
.-----.
--:::- h-1' 'J t. t/?-o(
Department Head
City Manager's Signature
Department Name
Page 2 of2
S:\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
ADDITIONAL AGENDA BACK UP
XI LEGAL
B ORDINANCES - 1st Reading
THIS ORDINANCE IS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA BUT
DOES NEED TO BE INCLUDED PLEASE ADD TO LEGAL
ORDINANCES FOR 1 ST READING
'1j-/~' 1: flY' -
~ 1\; ';;' / 13 ju-
r r~J JJ,Vh--.. ,-V, .... .
, ,. I /.-';. ../-1:::-7"-'
~U ,I . tM'?f ~ ''- C'
/{: ( ,
ORDINANCE NO 97-
v' /j !
1 r L---
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A DETERMINATION THAT
CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF
REGIONAL IMPACT APPROVED IN ORDINANCE NO 84-51
AND AMENDED IN ORDINANCES NOS 86-11 86-37, 88-3, 94-
10, 94-51, 96-33 AND 96-65 DO NOT CONSTITUTE A
SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION UNDER CHAPTER 38006,
FLORIDA STATUTES, 1996, DETERMINING THAT NO
FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW IS
NECESSARY REGARDING SUCH CHANGES, APPROVING
SUCH CHANGES, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER
(ORDINANCE NOS 84-51 86-11 86-37, 88-3, 94-10, 94-51, 96-
33 AND 96-65) FOR PURPOSES OF INCORPORATING THE
APPROVED CHANGES, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, Riteco Development Corporation, a Florida corporation ("Riteco") filed with
the City of Boynton Beach (the "City") an Application for Development Approval of
Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact (the "ADA") on May 21,1984, regarding that
certain property (the "Property") described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of
hereof' an:f
WHEREAS, the ADA was approved and the Development Order for the Property was
granted December 18. 1984 pursuant to Ordinance No 84-51 (the "Development Order") , and
WHEREAS. Riteco subsequently conveyed its right. title and interest in and to the
Property to Boynton Park of Commerce, Inc., a Florida corporation ("Boynton Park"), and,
Boynton Park. in turn. subsequently conveyed its right, title and interest in and to the Property
to Quantum Associates. a Florida general partnership (the "Developer"); and
WHEREAS, Developer filed with the City respective applications to amend the
Development Order, which applications were approved by the City in Ordinance No. 86-11,
Ordinance No. 86-37. Ordinance No. 88-3. Ordinance No, 94-10. Ordinance No. 94-51,
Ordinance No. 96-33. and Ordinance No. 96-65, and
'WHEREAS, the term "Development Order" includes all amendments thereto; and
WHEREAS. Developer is the curTent owner and developer of the remaining vacant land
within the Property (commonly known aa the Quantum Corporate Park at Boynton Beach
Development of RegiOnallmpad. or the Quantum Park DRI); and
WHEREAS, Developer has submitted to the City a Notification of Proposed Change to a
Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("NOpe.) requesting a further
amendment to the Development Order for the purpose of revising the Master Site Development
Page 1 of 4
....
.
Plan as follows. Shang.. in tr3#ie distribution Jue to possible future seve, if I!:I of Quantum-
Boulevard bet\"Icefl lots 22 and 31 dlld lots 6 through i 1 -ea.d change in the master plan
~ t q
designation of lots 6, 7 8, 9 10 11 ,~ .2i,~~ 2, f 15 16j!a~d 4~A ,r 'PI! 3~1
~'f'~ ~~~'- ~ X,
from office to office/industrial use, ~~ of lot~ 1 '. ~ _ . .' from office/hotel use to !~
1l.:;. {"- d..t YyL(,~~~ :L~",-
office/industrial/, commercial usef-orl3'ts 12, 13 and 14 from office/research and developm.ent to '. tL-
. J (.'\' /I /J:,.v-.t.'f',.J,i.-:,
J - tflJ' I w~~
officel'use U;;r M, ,"<if',] ,[., ':'J, He1T ,...-:-.J .,.!!'".J}'vm prlt~!t".1 te i"'~~1 ;.d ao8{/Of lots ,j'bL
---)/ - . I . ~ . J.. " .. h /) " tf...-<t";.,-,,,j
~ t1--c'- {) J.- I ,J.~..::t-vJ'- '~-<.L~ ~~.~ "",' J:
..t:"~~1, ~"ilM: 8S-,......1i~.~ &6 fromJPM- to office/industrial/ commercial use /lOT
G#w,
lot 40 from office/government and institutional to government and institutional use ....ctlan
_ the mast~lan designatioo of lots 58 59, 60, 61 and 62 from industrial/research and
development to office/industrial use, change in the mas{61 ~n de~i!:lnatton of lots 86, 87 88
89A, 898 and 908 from research and development to office/industrial use, change in the master
plan designation of lots 65A, 65B, 67B and 91 from office/hotel/commercial to
.
office/industrial/commercial use, change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64
\ from office/commercial to office/industrial/ commercial use, change in the master plan
\
1
) designation of lot 90A from research and development to government and institutional use,
J
I
I
I ~, . 'UA. ~, ~ iRd ~ ~-<<~ Ul '-~<'9qRdYdr:iaIlQ8~M=r.i=~ YIS; change in the p, 74 7'-
I ~ ?,J1t/i1 Ie ;"]-.J...}'-itf/1-"', ' ,
,I master plan designation of lots 46A, 48A, 48B, 48C, 50A, SOB ~~ 51DAfrom industrial to
\ ' t.~d~
office/industrial use; change in the mast~r pl~n cte~ignat~on ~f lots. 77, 78 .a,wa 79/lfrom. . '<2-
\ ,:A ~'~,,- -0'- ~-4~~:-~~ t:~-- "LA -" t , ...it. :Jt_~ t.. G) (- I A '-:f ":. '.
\ industrial/commercial to commercial ~se,^1~'"l.<;r... - !YF~~ J,->&1...U.- ;~1.c..''ft; " -~ J4~""';-<, j-Y~<. -<.",J' ~/
~
.trom office to com'l1ercial ute (see Exhibit "B" - Master Plan Amendment NO.8 to the Master
~J c7-o
Site Development Plan for Quantum Park, dated McpigA 6,1997), and
change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 68B from research and development to
office/industria~use; ~~1tMn"i\I&ler~R3t~~",__,., 10,
WHEREAS, the City Commission of Boynton Beach, as the governing body having
jurisdiction, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for amendments to
development orders approving developments of regional impact pursuant to Chapter 380 06,
Florida Statutes (1996), and
,
WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered the testimony, reports and other
documentary evidence submitted at said public hearing by Developer, the City staff and the
public, and the City Planning and Development Board's recommendations of the 13" day of
May, 1997, and'
WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered all of tHe forgoing.
Page 2 of 4
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT
Section 1 A notice of public hearing was duly published on the 5th day of May, 1997, in
the Palm Beach Post, a newspaper of general circulation in Boynton Beach, Florida, pursuant
to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes, and proof of said publication has been duly filed
It) ~~ bl1ue-
I (;
d:-4P/~IfL ~ .
A ~ J..- It <-l--tJL
jA;..J.:r }.....&L-Lk'
~~) fvdL~L~
A /!d) L.-. -- ~- f..<< Y\.
C4[7 _'~~ ~
-/~~
~d- -
:AI.. U/ '
~. . ,~JcFf ~I'ft' 9) Annual man' oring at t 'tersection 0 eway Boul e end P~id~e
r) I) ~- \ BO~~rd II be no at the nd of e ery y r to de ne when and,
r~ I I ~_ . ~. j prrfv,: ent are n t aintain th . ersection at the adopted
i:~Jl t t. level 0 _Nice.
~'I 1.'
, ,... _ t -t!-:-. 'Yr~~-f~ ~f'o/--"7-e ')
., ~ 7~ /. ~h) B8*8 ladllll<ialon-Iots 3, 22-~ .n . . III
f f) ,J. - j-- . I' 2-14 {',
(..-0 Uf// J A:1~A/ ~. . . .. .. '" ,r-:---- ~ .
,0-- )/,/".1-' \. l/./.v<-l..)/.j' . '1 ", j) Delete comme~~~'~",-JZ:! n, 7G..'~~~, ~
./JJ. -z/....1- .e~--- r-v.~[,...u/ ~. *". '.
~t~ ,~ '. , ~ 0
~j ~' LA./L . p..t..~ --k} DelAte commercial, but !"Ahlin hGtoll;lS8 OR lots 66, 87 A 8"d 67C;-~-
Juri,/~ t)
I A:: )Y1
,/ ./
, . ..J
, o)ilv) jf-
,-^- ~ ,.--:-
Ji'jl~l-'\:'-. .~ p <. J,)/
tv L i' '" C...~_t' rJ v,
/JY ll>~ ,j')/ '.' r
ll.,~.~ i- ~. '(,- ~.~rf'<V
~vl 'y ~ fr'- ~./"
f \ ,) L tA,.t/1, ~ \i.- Section 3. Upon consideration of all matters described in Section 380.06, Florida
1 J1~'
\ f X j/'.I~'}~11 Statutes (1996), it is hereby determined that
;/ \ rt:/O^ a It-'
1 f'/ \1J--f" I I' '"t/ i
V r IfC; ,"
~~.. · - J)I'1Y Y1 >"",U ,
Ci'l} V >, Jf1' v~
f l,t'- ,~).,..
LV'
Section 2. The Development Order shall be amended to include the following provisions
1 Master Plan Amendment No 8 to the Master Site Development Plan for
MJ d-c.-""> [Jr;/:'> VU~
Quantum Park. dated MarilP"6, 1997, is hereby approved.. -su~er" ~
..Jglle'l..il,~ lOonditionS.
'a)Q
, J~~~e !ras~ pi
vaO"ui~rJ/
~5i:.
~'m
o
e) ise s la de a a~f ~<?JeffOomL...
./
f}~~~~~on~e11roject.
~ office to lots 32. 33, 34&-34&, 3S, 3&;" 37 and 38.
~ If commercial ~ijelopme~t is a~prov ~n pa~cels 83, I an~or ,and .
'acanss fro sal i arce ,IS pr Ided 1 0 HIgh R e Ro . ,t e city, II I
req~.st a.~pd..'..te Oft..~ltra~itud...'I d ted J~~O, 1.' 96 0 ev ua the!
~rde~. and ~reshol~s Of.t,p le"n+ration hict{~;he t~ tim ng /
l~pravemel1ts ,.outl~ed I~t sEJY If he pdatE the "" to
modify. the ~taQing Pf., ! su mp~ v~!11e , en s modifi on will Jmad
a con~idon Qf appr<>>val site d lopm for the reel or parcels i \
question or of another site mutually agreed to by the city and the developer
Page 3 of 4
,.,
~
A. The amendments proposed by Developer do not unreasonably interfere
with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development
plan applicable to this area.
S The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the local
comprehensive plan and local land development regulations, subject to the
conditions outlined above
C The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the
recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, subject
to the conditions outlined above
D The amendments proposed by Developer do not create any additional
regional impacts and therefore do not constitute a substantial deviation under
Chapter 38006, Florida Statutes (1996)
Section 4 The City Commission has concluded as a matter of law that these
proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380 06, Florida
Statutes (1996), that Developer is entitled to the relief prayed and applied for and that the
Development Order is hereby amended incorporating the amendments proposed by Developer
as set forth in Section 2 above.
Section 5 Except as otherwise amended herein, the Development Order shall remain in
full force and effect.
Section I. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 7 Should any section or provision of this ordinance or portion hereof, any
paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the remainder of this ordinance.
Section 8. Authority is hereby granted to codify said ordinance.
Section 9 This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage,
I
FIRST READING this day of
SECOND READING and FINAL PASSAGE this
,1997
day of
,1997
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Page 4 of 4
MAYOR
ATTEST
CITY CLERK
(CORPORATE SEAL)
EXHISITS
"An - Legal Description
"sn - Amended Master Site Development ~Ian
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\ORDINANC\ORI 1997doc.doc
----------
)
.'\[J~
V 0 AV
\ 'c/.,
I
I
II
101
;j .
.,
~~
01
I
/1 7
}. 11/[
(')
I
(
1117
Page 5 of 4
...,
~
EXHIBIT "A"
-
-
OV8RALL BOUNDARY
LEq~L DBSCRIPTIOg
A Traet of land lY1n9 p.~ti.l1, in .eetton. ,., 11, 30 and 31
Townlhip .. .au.h, ~.n,e .3 ...t, ..1. .e.ch eounty, florid,
..id Traat betn, .o~e particUI.rll de..~ib.d .. 'allow.
Co...n.ln. .. ~h. 'oueh"el~ oorner 0 .a1d .eatton 11; thence
North 1-..' 3." I..t, along the We.' li..e of .ectton 11, I
di.tanae 01 131..10 !.et to a p01nt 1n the int.r.ection with th4
oent.rlin. o' H.W. 12nd Avenue, .. reGarded in O.R. aook 1131,
P.,e 1.'., 01 tbe pub1io Record. 01 ..1. ...ob County, florid_;
thenae with . b.arinG 01 HOI:'III ".04 t 32" I..~, along th<<
eenter1in. af H.W. 22nd Avenue, a d1.tane. of 1".3' feet to th,
Polnt of Se,1nn1n" thence North 1....3'. ...t, a di.tanee of
12".0' f.et to the South ri9ht of way llne of L.W.D.D. Lateral
21; thence Horth S'008"'" last along the lou~h riqht of wa~
line L.W.D.D. Lateral 21, a. recorded in O.R. Book 1732, Pa~e
612, of the public Records of 'al. Beach county, Florida, a
dietance of 635.93 f.et to the centerline of the L W.D 0
Equalizing Canal 1-4, aa recorded ln O.R. Book 1132, 'ag, 612,
of the Public Recorda of Pal. Beach county, Florida, thence
clang the centerline of the above d..cribed 1-4 canal wt~ a
curve to ~he right bavin, a chord bearing ot North 10032 If
.a.t, a radiu. of 150.00 feet, a central an91. of 4004'17", and
an arc lenqth of 53.21 fe.t, thenee continue along the
centerline of the 1-4 canal, with a bearinq of Horth 12D35'00"
East, a diatance of 320.69 f.et to a point of curve, thence with
a curve to the left havin, a radlu8 of 1500.00, a central angle
of J028 t 30", and an are length of 3'..23 feet; thence North
9006'30. Ba.t, a di.tance of 1919.16 f.et to a point on th~
lIorth Line of section 11: thence with . bearinCJ of north
89016'J9" la.t, alonq the Horth lin. of aection 11, a di8tance
of 196'.50 feet, thence south O.OZ'll" Bait, a diltance of
2625.18 feet, thence Horth 89008"'- .a.t, . di.tance of 368 96
I fe.t to a point OD the llorth ri9ht of way l1ne of N.W. :!2nd
Avenue a. recorded tn O.R. Book 113', .av. 1'" of the Publtc
I Recocde 01 'a1. .eacb eounty, rlorida, tbenc. Soutb 19021' 3l ..
,Iaat. . diataftc:e ot 50 00 feet to the centerline of N.W. 22nd
Ave_. &bena. "Lith a curve to the I'ight havin, a chord bearl119
ot -.ceb 15.Z".'" Baat, a radiu, of 1131.0Z feet, . central
an91. of '-53'5.", and an are length of 282.85 feet to a point,
thence north 12.0Z'.1" Bast, a dletance of 915.12 feet; ther~e
North 0.31'11" la.t, . di.tance of 399.10 f.et; thence No .
89012'31" laat, a diatance of 413.21 feetlthen South 88022'56"
Eaat, a d1.tance of 13'9.10 feet to . polnt on the West right of
way line of the Seaboard coastllne Railroad, thence South
0028'21" Ba.t, a10nCJ the w..t right of way line of the Railroad.
a diatance of 1309.09 feet to a polnt on tb. centerline of 1'- w
22nd Avenu., thence North 8S.21'31. W"C, alon, tbe centerline
of N. W. 2Znd Aven... a di.~.nce ot "2." !e.t, thence south
0033'53" .a.c, a distance of 130...' f.et, tbenae 80uth
880.5'31. .a.t, a dl.tanee of 333.51 fe.t to a point on tbe Welt
right 01 waf 01 the .eaboard co..tllne .al1ro... th..c. with I
b'~l'iD9 of loutb 1'-01'23" w..t, a10DI tbe Ne.t rttht 01 way of
the railroad, a d18tanaa of 1312.t' I.et, the.a. louth 0.33'!3"
BaaC, . diatana. 01 ZI..' feet, thine. loath 13-11'12- W..t, a
dietaace 0. "fir ~1 e.." thenae tlol'cll ".'0' 0.. We.t, . dtstanee
of 111.10 f..c, tbena. with a b.arla, Hortb 0.."21- W..t, a
dlat..nc:e of 200.00 f.et, thence Nortb .'.50'0." We.t, a distance
of 211.00 feet; thenc. South 0-."21- la.t a di.tance of 200 00
feet: thence North 88.50'0'" W..t, a d1~tance of 40.00 feet;
th.nce South 004"21" Ba.t, a di.~ance of 556 84 feet. then~'
~~~th 88050'04" w..t, a distance of 3611.21 fe.t to a pOlnt
c centerline of the above de.eribed centerline of the E-4
o:n_l; thene. with a b..rin, of Horth S.1I'14" w..c, a diltanee
of ~::.lJ fe.t, thence with a curv. to the ri,ht havlnQ a radius
.00 feet, . central angle of 15031".", and an arc ien9th
'I
I,
IILIGAL DlaCRIPTIOM . Continued I
I!of lZ2.12 feet; thenae North 10018'30. I.ee, a diec.nce
J9....a f..~ to . point of curve, thenaa witb . curva co the I,
I h..,ia9 a C'.diu. 0' .~IO.OO 'eet, . a.atC'sl ....1. o' 1'-ZO'04
'.nd aa a~. lenvCb of It3." f..t, th.na. wiCb . b..rin. of HOI
800S' 30. w..c, . di.t:anoe O. 11.. .1. ...c t:o . poille on t
;Icenterline 0' N.N. 22nd Avenue, thanee witb a bearin9 ot SOt
189004'32" We.t, alon, tbe cantarline o' M.W. 22nd Avenu.
idi.taac. of IS7.'S '.eC .01'. 01' 1... to tbe 'oint of ..,1nnim
Contaln1ng "1.'5 aor.. .or. or 1... aad .ubjec:t to ......n
and rigbt. of Na, of recard.
\1 ..
\,
.
--------.----
t: '10( H- I e,n- b
--~
..,
\1
,1- 'I) l
'I. I
III f J 'I
II ===~_I,. .._,
Ii, I,
--, '1 1
1-, 1---.
f
I
I
I I
"
/I
I I' ~,
Ii :1;::
",
iN'
-:,..
_A.
::"--,
.~:F='''~::'':''1 f
'4'11;-
~~
..
..... t
,.
A
-,
"-- -.---.
1-~:~1'='~~
1_-
,- ~:>
-.-
...
.
tr
'~l
I ..
. ..,
\ \ --~~:--
I \ ~~f~
if~---?~~~~ /
Jj '_~o /
1 J: ",,',' 0_\'
_ 0.1 I
lei _ u
1\, . --.--....-...
.. . .. - .... ....... . ........ -
.. .......... .... .,..,..
, .......,..........-.. ~ .... IC' r-aw ..
~_-=:..-r: ;r.1'~....~_.._-
~ _.. niilii'""' .... II"........... .....
:.r.~;".1;1-... ..
:UlIIwrL..n:=:--=c':=&."I ..-
t _ -. __......... _ _ tIJII..
MASTE!t PLAN AWtHDUEHT NO. .
MAItCH ....17
=r\ot.....~':nU ~..:r..= -:= ~'1r
· =====,,:r...-,:.':.:r'.:r.:::-..:-
MASTER
SITE
DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
LEGEND
-
~. ~
.--.
j
KEY PLAN
__ II--'
c.. ceo .. _... IUJ .....
..,. ......... eo It .....
e .. I c..... 1.I,1l "'. , 10."......
~ ...... II .. _
II ......,...,..... ..at .....
lIe.....~ au.....
- I.. ....
... - ..... ., eo ......
- ...U _..
QU,,"T"" ASSOCIATES
Notional CU, Cente,
"5 W..I W..hlngton 51.
In......... IN ..no..
(317) 'H-IICIO
c.lH ..oa ==r-
,-
,...- -
HI7 _..
'-
Requested City Commission
'feeling Dales
o \fa~ 6. 1997
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in 10 CilV Manager s Office
-\pril_5 1997 (noon)
Cv+ ~ 5'
~ Pi ~.~7:z4"'-. f-1 "'^- of
91 ~~ rV{-f. wk- ~
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH (,2~../k C DO's-
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FO~ ~ ~ ~
~ io^t~ltl~
V 1-f7ift:;:; ~ ~ ~
Date Final Form Mi!ie T~fo ~
10 .to CllV Mana2er s Office ..erl
June 20. 1997 (noon) ~f .
~l'U~
Julv 3 1997 (Thursday noon) ~
Requested City Commission
Meeling Dates
o Jul~ \ 1997
~ \fay 20 1997
May 9 1997 (noon)
o July I' 1997
o June 3 1997 \fay 23 1997 (noon) 0 -\ugust 5 1997 yt, July 25 1997 (noOlH
i.~~:J ~ ~a..~-+,-, wi,.-ttv 6fJ5o/f
o ,," 17 1997 ,,,,6 19971'OO"~ t:i~~;:::~
RECOMMENDA TION Please place /tlr:~uest below on the May 20 1997 City CommIssion meeting under Public
Hearing. The Planning and Development Board, with a 6-1 vote, recommends approval of the Quantum Park DR!
amendment and master plan modification, subject to all staff comments In Exhibit 'F" Conditions of Approval with the
exception of comments 7 8, 9 10, II 12, 13 17 and 19 and revisions to comments I and 16 relative to incomplete utIlity
system analysis and deleting commercial use on various lots.
~'1-f~~&c~-h~.
Regarding combent 8 (lack ofmamtenance of the sand pine preserve and other landscape areas), staff agrees to delete thIS
comment and will refer this lack of compliance to Code Enforcement. Regarding comments 9-13 (traffic), staff has received
the attached rebuttal from the i;D.. arek holding fas' '0 comments 9-13 therefore staff recommend. that they not be
deleted. Regarding comments 6 and mmercial use option on additional lots), staff strongly maintains that no
additional commercial lots be . garding comment 19, staff agrees to delete this comment and add it as a condition
of future site plan approval for industrial lots along Gateway
Lastly an ordinance is scheduled for fIrSt reading at the May 20m City Commission meeting as well, which is necessary to
amend the Quantum Park DR! development order The recommended conditions of approval are inserted in the ordinance
and are recommended for approval. For further details pertaining to this request, see attached Planning and Zoning
Department Memorandum No. 97-213
EXPLANATION
Project: Quantum Park PID
Agent: James G, Willard and Bowen LLP
O~U' QuanmmA~Wa
Location West side of the intersection of Interstate 95 and Gateway Boulevard
DESCRIPTION. Request to amend the previously approved PID master plan in connection with an amendment to the DRl
as follows:
Change in traffic.. - b due to possible future severing of Quantum Boulevard between lots 22 and 31 and lots 6
through 1 J, and c......dIe master plan designation of lots 6, 7 8, 9, 10, 11, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 30, 31, 2, 3 15
16 and 40A from office to office/industrial use; of lots I 66, 67 A and 67C from officelhotel use to office/industrial!
commercial use; oflots 12. 13 and 14 from office/research and development to office use; lots 32, 33 34A, 348, 35, 36, 37
and 38 from office/industrial to industrial use; of lots 17, 18, 19, 21, 39, 52, 81, 82, 83, 84 and 85 fh..'m office to
office/industriaJI commercial use; of lot 40 from office/government and institutional to government and institutional use;
change in the master plan designation of lots 58, 59, 60, 6land 62 from industriaJIresearch and development to
office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 86, 87, 88, 89A, 89B and 90B from research and
development to office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 65A, 65B. 678 and 91 from
officelhotellcommercial to office/industriaJIcommercial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 from
office/commercial to office/industria1l commercial use; change in the master plan designation of lot 90A from research and
development to government and institutional use; change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 68B from research
and development to office/industriaJI commercial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 56, 57, 69, 70, 72, 73A,
S'\BULLETlN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
.
fly o..'iNrO't,-
~i\ III -. ,j'.~~
7~~-.i Ib
~/~~"
.. ~.. /
/
... CITY OF BOYNTON ~ACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
,...
73B 7-t and 7; from mdustnal to officeiindustnaVcommerclal use change in the master plan designation of lots 46A, 48A.
488. -t8C ;OA, 50B, ; I 8 and 510 from industrial to office, industrial use change m the master plan deSignation of lots 76
"17 78 and 79 from mdustrlaVcommercial to commercial use' and change m the master plan deSignation of lot 80 from office
to commercial use
PROGRAM IMPACT
"'liA
FISCAL IMPACT
"'l/A
AL TERNA TIVES:
N/A
~
--/~~t ~
Department Head'
.
~
~ 4lJ-'-v ~
;' ity Manager's Signature
Department Name
Page 2 of2
S:\8ULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUMNO 97-213
TO'
Chamnan and Members
Planmng and Development Board
FROM.
.1
Tambn J Heyden, AICP Il<J.L--
Plannmg and Zomng DIrector
DATE.
May 8, 1997
SUBJECT
Quantum Park - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
Master Plan Amendment No 8 (combme land uses, add optIOnal uses to lots,
sever Quantum Boulevard)
NATURE OF REQUEST
Quantum Park of Commerce, a partIally bmlt-out Development of RegIOnal Impact (DRI)
compnsed of 539 9 acres, zoned PID (Planned Industnal Development), IS located on the west
sIde ofI-95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton (C-16) Canal (see attached locatIOn
map - Exhibit "A") James G Willard, Esqmre and agent for Quantum ASSOCIates, property
owner of the Quantum Park of Commerce, has requested an amendment to theIr DRI
development order, Ordmance No 84-51 as amended by Ordmance No 86-11, 86-37, 88-3, 94-
10,94-51,96-33 and 96-65 The proposed amendments whIch reVIse the master plan (master SIte
development plan) are as follows
1) Change in traffic distribution due to possible future severing of Quantum
80ulevard between lots 22 and 31 and lots 6 through 11
2) Change in the master plan designation of lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 22, 23, 24, 25,
26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 2, 3 15, 16 and 40A from office to office/industrial use,
3) Change in the master plan designation of lots 1, 66, 67 A and 67C from
office/hotel use to office/industrial/commercial use,
4) Change in the master plan designation of lots 12, 13 and 14 from office/research
and development to office use,
5) Change in the master plan designation of lots 32, 33, 34A, 348, 35, 36, 37 and
38 from office/industrial to industrial use,
6) Change in the master plan designation of lots 17,18,19,21,39, 52,83,84 and
85 from office to office/industrial/commercial use,
7) Change in the master plan designation of lot 40 from office/government and
institutional to government and institutional use,
8) Change in the master plan designation of lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62 from
industrial/research and development to office/industrial use,
9) Change in the master plan designation of lots 86, 87, 88, 89A, 89B and 90B from
research and development to office/industrial use,
10) Change in the master plan designation of lots 65A, 658, 678 and 91 from
office/hotel/commercial to office/industrial/commercial use,
11) Change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 from office/commercial
to officelindustrial/commercial use,
12) Change in the master plan designation of lot 90A from research and
development to government and institutional use,
I
Page 2
Memorandum No 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
13) Change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 688 from research and
development to office/industrial/commercial use,
14) Change in the master plan designation of lots 56, 57, 69, 70, 72, 73A, 738, 74
and 75 from industrial to office/industrial/commercial use,
15) Change in the master plan designation of lots 46A, 48A, 488, 48C, 50A, 508,
518 and 51 D from industrial to office/industrial use,
16) Change in the master plan designation of lots 76, 77, 78 and 79 from
industrial/commercial to commercial use,
17) Change in the master plan designation of lot 80 from industrial/commercial to
commercial use, and
18) Change m the master plan desIgnatIOn of lots 81 and 82 from
industnal/commercIal to office/industnal/commercIal use.
BACKGROUND
The amendment request IS governed by SectIOn 7 of AppendIx A, Zomng, CIty of Boynton
Beach Code of Ordmances, whIch estabhshes Planned Industnal Development DIStrIctS and by
Chapter 38006 (19) (e) (2), Flonda Statutes, Developments of RegIOnal Impact - SubstantIal
DeViatIOns. ThIS amendment IS submItted m connectIOn wIth a request from the apphcant that:
1) the CIty make a determination that the master plan amendment IS not substantial m
nature and
2) the proposed change to the Quantum Park DRI development order
a) IS not a substantIal deViatIOn and
b) does not reqUIre further Development of RegIOnal Impact reVIew
A pubhc hearmg must be conducted by the CIty CommIssIOn pnor to makmg a determmatIOn as
to whether the proposed change IS substantial m nature and whether further development of
regIOnal Impact reVIew IS reqUIred. If no further reVIew IS reqUIred, the CIty CommISSIon shall
Issue an amended development order which, m this mstance, reqUIres the passage of an ordmance
WhICh amends the ongmal development order If a determmatIOn IS made that the proposed
change reqUIres further development of regIOnal Impact reVIew, the reVIew shall be conducted
only on those aspects of the development order reqUIred to be changed.
The reqUIred pubhc hearmg shall receIve a fifteen (15) day pubhc notIce, followmg the passage
of thIrty (30) days, but not more than forty-five (45) days after receIpt of the amendment
matenals, The CIty CommIssIOn wIll conduct ItS hearmg on May 20, 1997, as advertIsed, and If
the CIty CommISSIon determmes the proposed changes to be non-substantial, wIth no further
reVIew reqUIred, first readmg of the amended Quantum Park development order (an ordmance)
Will occur on May 20, 1997 as well.
On December 17, 1996, the City CommISSIOn approved an amendment to the Quantum Park
master plan m connectIOn \vIth the seventh amendment to the Quantum Park DRI development
order At thIS time, the CommISSIOn agreed to retam note 4 on the master plan m exchange for
Quantum Park preparmg a revIsed master plan havmg a "use trading matnx", pnor to any future
change to a lot desIgnated commercIal on the Quantum Park master plan. Note 4 reads, "Lots
~
Page 3
Memorandum No 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
WIthm the project may be changed/relocated by approval of the CIty CormmssIOn wIthout further
DRI reVIew or amendment." The subject request has been submitted to address the
ComlmssIOn's December 17, 1996 dIrectIOn to the applIcant whIch IS necessary now to allow
approval of a restaurant (commercIal) on the recently approved Hampton Inn parcel (lot 1).
ANAL YSIS
ExhibIt B contams the proposed master SIte development plan. Added to each lot Impacted by
thIS request are the current approved land use designations for ease of companson wIthm thIS
exhibIt. The chart below summarIzes the number of lots Impacted by thIS request.
FROM TO NUMBER OF LOTS LOT NUMBERS
Office Office Industrial 21 6,7,8,910,11,22,23,
24,25,26,27,28,29,
30,31,2,3,15,16,40A
OfficelHotel Office Industrial Commercial 4 1,66, 67A, 67C
OfficelResearch & Development Office 3 12, 13, 14
Office/Industrial Industrial 8 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35,
36,37,38
Office Office Industrial Commercial 9 17 18,19,21,39,52,
83,84,85
Office/ Government & Institutional Government & Institutional 1 40
IndustriaIlResearch & Development Office Industrial 5 58,59,60,61,62
Research & Development Office Industrial 6 86, 87, 88, 89A, 89B,
90B
OfficelHotel/Commercial Office Industrial Commercial 4 65A, 65B, 67B, 91
Office/Commercial Office Industrial Commercial 2 63,64
Research & Development Government & Institutional 1 90A
Research & Development Office Industrial Commercial 2 68A, 68B
Industrial Office Industrial Commercial 9 56,57,69,70,72,
73A, 73B, 74, 75
Industrial Office Industrial 8 46A, 48A, 48B, 48C,
50A, 50B, 51B, 5ID
Industrial/Commercial Commercial 4 76, 77, 78, 79
Industrial/Commercial Commercial 1 80
Industrial/Commercial Office/Industrial/Commercial 2 81,82
As shown in the chart above, the optIOn of mdustnalIs bemg added to a net of 34 lots, the option
of commercial IS being added to a net of 24 lots, and the optIOn of office IS bemg added to a net
of 21 lots. ExhibIt C graphIcally illustrates the lot locatIOns of the optIOnal land uses of pnmary
3
Page 4
Memorandum No 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-001lDRIA 97-001
mterest. In general terms, mdustnalIs being added to the northwest comer of the PID (adjacent
to the Dos Lagos PUD), at the northeast comer of Gateway Boulevard and High RIdge Road and
on the south sIde of Gateway Boulevard, between Quantum Lakes Dnve and Park Ridge
Boulevard. Commercial IS bemg added to the lots along the eastern segment of Park RIdge
Boulevard (includmg four lots the back up to 1-95) Both commerCIal and mdustrial are being
added along Gateway Boulevard. The effect of thIS, If approved, would be to allow commercial
uses along the entire stretch of Gateway Boulevard (excludmg three BGI lots) and abuttmg 1-95
With any redIstributIOn or redesIgnatIOn of land use WItlnn the master plan, the followmg local
issues are evaluated.
1 Does the redIstributIOnlredesIgnatIOn of land use result m a change m concept for
the Quantum Park of Commerce or the abIlIty of the Park to develop m a quahty
manner?
2. What Impact Will the land use redistributIOnlredesIgnatIOn have on projected
expendItures whIch wIll be spent wIthm the regIOn?
3 Does the Impact of the land use redIstributIOnlredesIgnatIOn result m a conflIct
With the number, type and payroll level of Jobs projected m Quantum Park's
ApplIcatIOn for Development Approval (ADA)?
4 What Impact WIll the land use redIstributIOnlredesIgnatIOn have on adjacent
property?
5 Will there be an mcrease m traffic resulting from the land use
redIstributionlredesIgnatIOn?
Regardmg Issue one above, last summer, the apphcant submItted a master plan amendment/DRI
amendment to allow, among other thmgs, the option of commerCial on all 1-95 abuttmg lots,
most of the west SIde of the eastern segment of Park Ridge Boulevard, as well as along the
Gateway Boulevard corndor east of Quantum Lakes Dnve As a condItion of approval, the
applicant was reqUIred by the CommIssion to not only lImIt the total acres of commerCial, but
deSIgnate the exact locatIOn of those 47 acres. ThIS was m response to the follOWing concerns
whIch CIty staff belIeve apply to the subject request as well
a. The "optIOn" of commercIal on such a large number of lots defeats the purpose of
master plannmg and wIll lead to spotty locatmg of commercial uses WIth no
conSIderatIOn of adjacent uses.
b CommerCial uses, whIch draw customers, pedestnans and vehIcles, haphazardly
mIxed WIth mdustrIal uses, whIch reqUIre greater tractor trailer traffic, IS
potentially unsafe and IS not recommended by transportatIOn planners.
c. Addmg the optIOn of commerCIal use on lots along Gateway Boulevard and High
RIdge Road and along the railroad tracks and 1-95 will Impact the type of
commercIal ventures 10terested m 10cat1Og 10 Quantum Park. Tlns slnft will attract
commerCial uses such as servIce statIOns, fast food restaurants, oil change garages,
and stnp commerCial that will be 10terested In the 1-95 vIsibihty and captunng
external project traffic, With lIttle relatIOn to the planned 10dustnal park.
d. In the VICIruty of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road, west of
Congress Avenue alone, there IS already 500,000 square feet of commerCial square
if
Page 5
Memorandum No 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
footage approved, unbmlt and vested smce 1990 These approvals, as well as the
ViSIOns 20/20 commercIal reVItalIzatIOn efforts planned for Federal Highway, Will
be competmg With the pnme vIsibihty, hIgh traffic commercIal lots proposed m
Quantum Park, due to the type of commercial uses that will now be mterested m
locatmg m Quantum Park. Smce the demand for commercIal land use IS firute, ~
some eXIstmg commercIal uses WIthm the CIty may mIgrate to Quantum Park.
e. Stnp commercIal and the types of commercial uses that will be mterested m locatmg
close to the 1-95 mterchange will lead to re-subdIvIsIon of the maJonty of the
proposed commercIal parcels along Gateway Boulevard mto smaller parcels and the
creatIOn of outbuildmgs, whIch will mcrease the appearance of more commercIal
use m the PID ThIs IS because, although the land area would not mcrease, more
commercIal bmldmgs would result smce the types of commercIal referenced reqUIre
smaller parcels than IS currently platted along Gateway Boulevard. Also, there '
would be the potentIal for stackmg of buildmgs and sIgnage; all competmg for
VIsibilIty and access to remam Viable; factors less Important for office and
manufactunng uses.
f. As stated m the zorung code, "The purpose of the PID dIStnCt is to proVIde a zoning
clasSIficatIon for lIght mdustnal development that will better satISfy current
demands for lIght mdustnal zoned lands by encouragmg development whIch will
reflect changes m the technology of land development and relate the development of
land to the speCIfic SIte and to conserve natural amerutIes." The mcreased optIOn of
commerCial space causes a shIft m the Image of the PID, espeCially as VIewed from
the 1-95 mterchange; one of the major gateways to the CIty This ShIft has no
connectIOn to any change m mdustnal technology and the demand for mdustnal
land. Rather than creatmg unIque opporturutIes for development not proVIded ...
elsewhere m the CIty, the ShIft competes With other areas of the CIty
g. It has been argued by the applIcant that the CIty can control undeSIrable commercial
uses through the use approval process. The use approval process IS the method
deVIsed for a PID to establIsh uses permItted for a speCIfic PID dIStnCt, rather than
establIsh m the zonmg code a ngId lIst of permItted uses. ThIs method was deVIsed
for flexibilIty and to keep up With technology as new uses are created m the
marketplace. However, to allow blanket approval of commerCial, WIthOUt
consIdenng 10catIOnalImpacts, defeats the purpose of master planrung and weakens ·
the CIty'S abIlIty to deny a speCIfic commercIal use at the time of use approval If a
parcel has already been deSIgnated for commercial use.
h. The proposed commerCIal optIOn of all the lots south of Gateway Boulevard that
back up to the raIlroad tracks and 1-95 will encourage further COnflICtS With the PID
penpheral greenbelt reqUIred to be mstalled along the railroad tracks and the 4
approved Quantum Park SIgn program. ThIs IS due to the deSIre of these uses, more
so than other uses, to have unobstructed VIsibIlIty of buildmgs, sIgnage and extenor
storage and dIsplay areas from 1-95, examples of whIch can be seen WIthm other
CItIes along 1-95 ThIS was the reason that the maJonty of the commercial lots are
located mternally to the park on the approved master plan.
1. Over the past two years, there has been mcreasmg mterest m locatmg manufactunng
uses WIthm Quantum Park. In recogrutIOn of the CIty'S need to attract research and
development and lIght mdustnal uses to dIverSIfy ItS economIC base, the CIty
aggreSSIvely pursued BGl to locate m Quantum Park. The CIty also Identified
economIC development as one of ItS vlSlorung goals. Towards that end an economIC
5"
Page 6
Memorandum No 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
aggressIvely pursued BGI to locate In Quantum Park. The CIty also IdentIfied
economIC development as one of ItS visiomng goals. Towards that end an econormc ..-
-
development dIrector was hIred last September and an economic Incentive program
for Quantum Park was adopted applIcable to developments bnngIng In a certain
number of jobs. The jobs however, also needed to pay a certaIn rmnimum salary e
Also, as one of the CIty'S recently adopted "qUIck VICtOry" vlSlomng projects, a
formal marketIng program will be developed WIthIn 90 days to further promote ;
Quantum Park as an Industnal park.
As a pOInt of Interest, Boca Raton IS currently processIng a DRI for the vacant IBM
bUIldIng and 500 acres In the vlclmty for a 5 millIon square foot lIght Industnal .
park! TIns actIOn sIgnals further competItIOn, and also IndIcates a strong market at
tIns tIme for lIght Industnal uses.
)
RegardIng Issue two above, It IS antIcIpated that the proposed master plan ch;mges will have no .~
effect on the prOjected expendItures whIch will be spent WIthIn the regIOn. RegardIng Issue three
above, It IS belIeved that the proposed master plan changes will have an effect on the number, type _
and payroll level of jobs projected In Quantum Park's ongInal applIcatIOn for Development
Approval (ADA) TIns IS because allOWIng the optIon of commerCIal on lots WIth lugh VIsibilIty,
and lugh pass-by traffic WIll encourage development of these lots as commerCIal over industnal.
The pay range for servIce sector jobs IS smaller and Industnal acreage proVIdes a greater number of
jobs than commerCIal acreage. Jobs salanes are, In turn, lInked to home pnces. AttractIng hIgher ..
~ed reSIdentIal developments was also a ViSIOns 20/20 ObjectIve.
Regarding Issue 4 (impact on adjacent property), there IS a concern WIth locating Industnal uses
adjacent to the Dos Lagos PUD ThIs IS based on the expenence the CIty has had WIth complaInts
from the reSIdents south of Quantum Park regardIng truck, radIO and VOIce nOIse and early hours of
operatIOn of the Industnal uses along the south border of the Park and as far away as the PublIx
DIstributIon Center The buffenng proposed wIll only proVIde VISual, and not audItory, mItIgatIOn
due to the Inherent IncompatibIlIty of these uses.
RegardIng Issue 5 (traffic), the CIty does not have a traffic engIneer or traffic planner on board and
does not budget for outSIde reVIew of submItted traffic studIes, therefore the CIty must rely on the ..
regIOnal plannmg COunCIl'S (RPC) reVIew of Quantum Park's traffic study ExhibIt "D" contaIns
the RPC's comments on the study It also contaInS FDOT's traffic comments (on state roads only)
and the project traffic engIneer's response to the RPC's comments. The RPC, nor Palm Beach
County, had suffiCIent tIme to reVIew the traffic engIneer's response pnor to the wntIng of tIns
report. Therefore, traffic concerns WIll have to be resolved pnor to CommISSIOn approval of tIns
request. As a pOInt of InfOrmatIOn, staff has also asked the RPC to make a recommendatIOn
regardIng the tImIng of the wldemng of Gateway Boulevard. The development order IndIcates that
tIns was to be done by the end of 1994 SInce build out of the project has occurred more slowly
than expected, thIs tImeframe needs to be adjusted accordmgly
In addItIon to the redeslgnatIOn of lots for greater flexibilIty, Quantum Park Boulevard IS proposed
to be severed. ThIs would allow consolIdatIOn of lots In thIS area for development by one Industnal
user Although thIS WIll reqUIre a future abandonment applIcatIOn to be processed, It was Included
at thIS tIme because It IS a regIOnal Issue and potentIally Impacts the DRI's road system due to
redIstributIOn of tnps. Staff concerns from EngIneering, RecreatIOn and Parks, UtilItIes and Fire
Departments regardIng thIS sevenng are Included In ExhibIt "F" - ConditIOns of Approval.
r;
Page 7
Memorandum No 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
RECOMMENDATION
To address the conflIcts staff has raIsed WIth tlns request's Impact on the CIty'S objectIve of
actIvely promotmg Quantum Park as an mdustnal park, staff recommends the land use desIgnatIOn
changes Illustrated on ExhibIt "E" These changes mclude the follOWIng:
1 deletIOn of mdustnal on lots 3, 22-31 and 6-11 ,
2. addItIon ofmdustnal on lots 12-14,
3 deletIOn of commercial on lots 17-19,21,39,52,56,57, 72, 70, 69, 73A, 73B, 74, 75, 81,
82, 83-85, 68A and 68B,
4 deletIOn of commercial, but retammg hotel use on lots 66, 67 A and 67C,
5 addItIon of office to lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38
Pursuant to Flonda Statutes, Chapter 38006(19) SubstantIal DeViatIOns, the submItted
amendment IS conSIdered to be an (e)(3) type change (a change not speCIfically claSSIfied
elsewhere under state law) Under (e)(3) changes, the apphcant must prOVIde "clear and
convmcmg eVIdence" supportmg that hIS requested changes do not constItute a substantIal
deVIatIOn. The only aspect of thIS request that mIght possibly constItute a substantIal deViatIOn IS
the redIstributIOn of traffic caused by the large flexibIhty of land use allocatIOn m the project.
Therefore, staff recommends approval of thIS request, subject to staff comments m ExhibIt "F" -
CondItIons of Approval, whIch must be addressed pnor to adoptIOn of the ordmance amendmg
the development order Staff further recommends that the commISSIOn determme that tills
applicatIOn does not constItute a substantIal master plan change pursuant to local codes and does
not constItute a substantIal deViatIOn under state law
TJH.dIm
Attachments
xc Apphcant
Central FIle
S:\P1anning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\MPMD\staffreport.doc
7
EXHIBIT "A"
6
L0~ATION MAt)
QUANTUM CORPORATE PAR~
~f!j1 ( lTli'li- ---",'1." ~ 'tJ. '\ /. : ~ l/~ 1'\11
.,. I ' ~ '" f~ '. '. . .1-- f /-1
-r, ~.. 'S'~' ::.:" ,.':.. '\ ~,\,' \,.. r~ ~___ I...U' r-II
\~ , 'r .., : \ " . _ _ ~I
'''''''''''''' UUl-tlli:-:~'''~'''''''~~_ .~~\\./ '-,,' '-':l r 't;. l::ll
HI/III>' '" ,} \' .~\, ~';'-_:'.'.': .., \ .~... I:
~ ~ ;;:rr · I-'.:;"~t;.t '~, '\ '!\r ~.,) # "" S-r4'T
.....,rj l-J ",,~;y, :--..J 11111 "I::t:. ~. · , ~ At IRri I.
~~...... "I/> '. / 0<'-----.-'" 'j .
lJIlJJ ,t' H, ~/ :~ I; , "~"J 4. Ai j ''''''.l:i'''-' I.~ :_ _
..... .~. ~ ~I, ~
' rm;= ~ " II::; (' ~
I r= 111 "'1':. ..-----1/21; jl/ j '. I
:' "" If":,,,. "~' iff ",,, "", .: ............. .~_ ~. ~ r:; I .' CtJ/ I ~
,
1\101-
, ; ',:,..'J."\"';;"W.;ifi;;*,}',!:.,,\~~ ':!"'L~\W;.;;",;;:,..,.., . JY!'
- u ~ ;:::- ~ ...'...""".....".......".......".,.w.,... ............,...,."......." .. C, 1'" Y ~ ""J
[ -::.- " .~ / /4fJ!~'.~[.~~W<<~f;ailit~!~tfjl;.;? !!!" . 'r;': ~ Ii f?lll
~ '" ~ ~,' ~ fil, ,id~~t~ft.\~ff4Hi~t~~iifflf ~ __!.: ~:f-J
t:7", ~ ' .W r 1'r::t .,,". " .... ,. "''''(ffi~f'''''' ~ __', I "-L... 4 J
~. ': t2' $~!~~l;:{j~ it. ,e"~lg[!,,; l;';:r'5i.~'.,;",,,, , ".,,!~ '.f
~ l!1 ~ FI ..,.,....,.." 'w"...,.,..... .... "".~ i"".' ."...._"~~:......,.,'yi".....,...'v'''e''''. j
I
::- (""liT'" ~i~'f~j. .., ~E~tl%. , ..... ....., . "'" ............ '.. .~' [) ~
~'.- . ;~;..._~"~~~-~.~~,
r" - -~) : "';i",,,,. .,.., ., ','..i; ;J,..:StlJfA'" ''''''''''"''"ii~.,.. ..,..... ":'i' 'tiffJ:" iii;;',""', ,,"',,!!!ff!,.,.. .,.It':.: ::::-;':~;;~:i::i:!)::".:~.:f.j I ,I /
./ I.' , ';"\""'1; 'Y"~~:.. .-::, ;.::';..... ". . A~4t "",,: ;;,.::;~, 'i':':j:~!,iili,.../\;: ...\'tlf}.{!'t':l'\;\;'I:!'i" I if i
; " ;" '..;,;" ;ii, ',.'. ....,...... '......". .... .,...... ..,.. ." ,.."". ,..,,; ...,....,..""" ....... e '"ijj''' .... ...."..,.",... ~
, ~...... .,...... '.. .... ."..";;.....,,. ......... ''';C'' ............ ..,.,';'-" i;" ......e "... ...., .....e... . '... . ' '1
TI/ _
~\ b:::/= >-"'1~" -' '. -~ ~ Ii:::: / i--' .':.
1/8 MILESV '-Jf " Cor: '" '" , :: r:::: =~ ~ ;:" , I , ' , I '':'')-J'
'/ J ~>Co_ '~'- ~..:. r=::-~ ~ _ f j / ~;::I~~_
,- '-:::: r=::-- ~- ,.. " ili tJ_(~".
--= . '-.. r- : '~"."
:> 800 FEE;T - -... ,;. ~ ,- _ 'J , fJ!I11''1!IlIWII" ,
"'. -..-----: 3.:.~:z,;~1 ':;:i ~~!!tli '- "ern_
j
~
I
EXHIBIT "B"
(0
EXHIBIT "c"
/d,
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
EXHIBIT .C.
n":,~'-
'I
1--
11.- if" l
'1, ,
III f J 'I
Ii .=--==,:,:..:.:.::',!":o:; ~~"'" '__
1'1 ,.
I II
:1 -, -, 1 1
!- 1. 1--,
j'1
(
III
':,
iiT
- .=-- -.
~ ~-:.-s.:~~~:?'~:"::"
....-
t
..."...
~.....
t.-g
-
t!.a.t
::-
-
--,
r'~~-:;;~-L~
,1-
f-:\:>
._..~
'!..
.'
I
"
1/
;;.
il-
,1 '1
II ,l
"
'.&1
LOTS ADDING COMMERCIAt---
1:
! ('
I
i I,'!
. - ~I ,.
!ft. .JM. I
:. 'jll .Iff) ...... .
:: . ~~. 1~/ ~~---
u....._...~--- - ~'F
----v-----.r~_
,
i :/;""
i ,."
LOTS ADDING INDUSTRIAL
,
,
,
,
LOTS ADDING BOTH /
,
COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAl. co;"
,
,
,
-' '-----
l('
i\
.....
MASTER PLAN AMENOMENT NO. 8
MARCH 8. t 117
.....llOlIIIDNfl/I,..lIIbCIlL1D ....___Afftll.
... or ttC .... WICXll ~ . ICCffIIWoCI ......
(llII ....1rC*l.., NO . QlIt:O ./1"'.
J ==~. M ~M'!1~-::' ::'crm be
tcIIIl . CUll) t,.,- 10 .,. CItOtS ws.ar MIA.
~ i:'~..:=-..:. 14# ___ .....
MIl "lJNmU .. .. NlIU\. ..... (DMII(IIIOIl Il(SOIA....'
J ...... CJID> ..... ,. .. ......, ....... __ .un 1M.
=~ ~\,~.:. ~~:.::~. == ~= =n:u'1.
~ttl."II(I'"
, :::: ~ :"J~,J:"=".=r~' ::.!' WCA1II
MASTER
SITE
DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
LEGEND
.. b. ~
----- -
..fllrt
T
KEY PLAN
&-
CommItI.., 0...._..1
COWIl (C...........IaI) 13.53 Ac,..
INO (lndu.lrlal) 'o.n Acr..
C .. I (Co_IaljlMlltullonal) 50.n Ac,..
OFF (Olflc.) 11.44 Acr..
a (o,nc./IndII.I,IaI) 100.25 Ac:,..
ac (Oll",./ln_lrIaI/tommwclal) lOll. 53 Ao..
Wetlondl 1.00 Io.cr..
Sond P~. H..... 4~.OO Acr..
Road. ~,.U Acr..
QUANTUM ASSOCIATES
Notional City Center
115 West Washington st
Indianapolis. IN 46204
(317) 636-1600
OPEN SPACE::::::r-
Park.
,.....~
'0.1' Acr..
Note Lots with handwritten land use designations noted on them are lots
impacted by this amendment. The handwritten land use is the current approved
land use. The typed land use designation, on those lots with no handwritten land
use designation, is the current approved land use.
/3
EXHIBIT "0"
Ii-
MAV-08-1997 14 36
~'
"
t'"
I~l'
i.;;:
~;"
-.:;.
~<":
~. .
....::
t~.
~,~,
,'::;"
...~_.
;;f
~-~"
."'~'
i';;:
~
~.'
1::~;
.,.
t.c.
109-':':
"I'~:.
i~~-~
r
"1:"
TeRPe
(reO/urea
COQ(t I
reglona
Plonninng
counc
5612214067 P 01/02
~
'\.
j 1 i
'UUj
MAY - 8
PLANNING ANi)
ZONING DEPT.
Apnl 16, 1997
Ms. Tambn Heyden. Director
Planning and Zoning Department
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Subject: Quantum Park Development of Regional Impact
ReView of Proposed Change
Dear Ms. Heyden.
In accordance with the reqUlrements of SectIon 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, we have
reVIewed the "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of
Regional Impact (DRI)" (NOPC) for Quantum Park DR! dated March 17, 19q7 submitted to
Council by James G. Willard on March 17, 1997
The NOpe proposes to revise the master plan to slmplifv the land use designations on lots
WIthin the DR! reducing the number of categories of approved uses, place multiple uses on
the unsold lots to prOVide more flexibility for better marketing, provlde for the potential
redevelopment of lots 22 through 31 and 6 through 11 m conjunction with the abandonment
of Quatum Boulevard contiguous to these lots, and revise the development order as It relates
to traffic momtoring
The applicant believes the changes meets the cntena of SectiOn 380.06(l9)(e)2.. Florida
Stat1!ltes (F S ) Council does not agree and believes the change is presumed to be a
subs.tantial deviationpursuiiiflo-S-cclion-"380,06(19)(e)3., F S The appl~cant has prOVIded a
traffle analysis to rebut the presumption information to show that the changes will not create
any ~ditlonal regional impacts which would require substantial deviation review
Cou~cil has reVIewed the traffic stud) provided by the applIcant to rebut the presumptIon
and i has the following conunents/concems
312. s.w. martin downs blvd.
suit. 205 . p,o M" 1529
palm ctty, florlClO Mf'IO
phe... (5611221-4060
Ie 269.CCJ60 fax 11611221-4067
(5
'07
, ' ~ ~ )
.
~ d I
11 f
o
l
~AY-08-1997 14 37
TCRPC
5512214067 P 02/02
.-
Ms. Tambri Heyden
April 16, 1997
Page 2
1) The previous traffic study done for the Quantum Park DRl assumes a. total of 1,430,000
square feet of gross floor area (GFA) of office development. However the Master Plan
includes 1,687,772 GFA for office development. Traffic impacts due to the additional office
deveLopment has not been addressed in the traffic study The Increase In office would create
unrevlewed traffic impact, Therefore, the master plan should be revised to include 1,430 000
GF A of office development to be consistent With the traffic study
2) The project is currently allows the tradeoff of square footage of conun~rciaI development
for hotel rooms (268 SF/room) The origmal plan proposed two 2~room hotels for a
muimum of 400 rooms. The master plan should be revised to mc:lude a maximum of 400
hotel rooms
3) The proposed master plan indicates the project IS vested for 63,752 average dally tnps. If
the trip generation potentIal of the project is to contInue [0 be included in the master plan the
pm peak hour trip generatlon should also be mcluded
4) There IS an eXisting development order condition which requires mOJilitoring of trips for
every commercIal sIte approved along Park RIdge Road. The monitormg is requued to
Identtfy intersection improvements at Gateway Boulevard and Park RIdge Road. However
project traffic whIch was antlclpared along Park RIdge Road may occur somewhere else in
[he project based on the proposed changes to the master plan. GIven the proposed large
flexibility of land use allocation within the project, a new condiuon should be mcluded in the
development order [0 perform annual mOnItormg at the intersection of Gateway Boulevard
and Park Ridge Road. ThIS conditIon should deternune what and when improvements are
needed to mamtain the facility at the adopted level of service.
Please call If you have any questions.
Sincerely.
L!J
J James T Snyder
Ex.ecutive Director
I
I
I
Mm/jts
cc Peter D Spyke. TCRPC Actmg ChaIrman
I
mreg Stuart, FDCA
~ames G Willard, Applicant
I
TOTAL F 02
1&
~=n
-~~.'I,J. n il/1 R .00
' It '-~ U I!J ~ n
--'"-!gq~ ! I ~
Hi'] -~:J
if"' ~,iD
I .~' ;:011-
._,.,....~.~~.~.;.~.....-~ ':.; ",,'.
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Engineering
Planning
and
Environmental
Consultants
May 2, 1997
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning and Zoning Department
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Dear Ms. Heyden
We have reviewed the letter from James Snyder of the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council dated April 16, 1997 regarding the Quantum Park NOPC. The
following responds to the four review comments provided in the subject letter
1) The land use maximums specified on the plan are not being
changed as a part of this NOPC. The current plan allows
1,685,772 square feet of office space. However, for clarity we
have provided the following background information Table 2D
reflects the land use consistent with the ADA. It includes 4 43
million square feet of industrial, 426,888 square feet of
commercial, and 1 68 million square feet of office. It also includes
400 hotel rooms. The total trips were 67,154 During the review
process, it was determined that the hotel use should be treated as
commercial with a trade-off of square footage of 268 square feet of
commercial per hotel room
Therefore the hotel trips are now included in the total commercial
trips. This resulted in 63/752 total vested trips (see revised table
20)
The traffic analysis undertaken as a part of the study for
Amendment No 7 included land use totalling 65/300 daily trips
(see attached table) Thus the study actually evaluated a greater
impact than can now occur based on land use maximums. The
attached table shows that the total square footage for the
combination of Industrial and R & D was 3 772 million square feet.
.
TEL 407 898 1511
FAX 407 894 4791
/7
.
Suite 200
The Carr Building
3113 Lawlon Road
Orlando, Florida
32803
~=~
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Ms. Tambri Heyden, May 2, 1997 Page 2
However, the final approval of amendment No.7 limited
industrial, including R&D, to 2,784,354 square feet. Thus
industrial use was decreased by 988,144 square feet. At the same
time the City limited industrial square footage, it set the limit on
office at 1,685 772 square feet.
The amendment No 7 study had actually used 1,416, 625 square
feet (the 1,430,000 square feet referenced in Mr Snyder's letter is
from another table referenced in the study) Thus the approved
office is 269,147 square feet more than that contained in the study
This is more than offset by the reduced industrial referenced above
The effect of these changes represented an increase of 339 PM peak
hour office trips and a corresponding decrease of 655 PM peak
hour industrial trips. Clearly, there is less impact with the current
plan
2) The approved trade-off mechanism to convert hotel to commercial
ensures that the project impacts cannot be exceeded In addition,
all development proposals for Quantum Park require site plan
review and approval by the City for individual land use
compatibility Since there is no danger of increased impacts and
the City has site plan approval control, there does
not seem to be a need to place a maximum on hotel development.
The proposed cap may impose an unnecessary NOPC to review
what would be no increase in impact.
3) The daily vesting was included at the request of the City due to the
fact that the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards
monitor traffic on a daily basis. This gives them a value to monitor
A peak hour vested threshold is not needed If and when
necessary, allowable peak hour trips can always be calculated
based on the original ADA land use.
4) The only possible effect of the proposed master plan changes on
the subject intersection come from increased commercial
development north of Gateway Boulevard. As noted in the
Amendment 8 traffic study, this causes a decrease in the
commercial development allowable south of the
intersection The traffic study demonstrates that with this scenario,
the committed improvements still provide the necessary traffic
capacity The only possible effect may be that if commercial
development were to occur to a significant level north of Gateway
Boulevard prior to significant commercial development to the south
of Gateway Boulevard, the order of priority for implementing
committed improvements at the intersection may possibly change.
Therefore a development order condition as follows would be
acceptable to the applicant:
/8
--
APPROVED TRIP GENERATION-DAILY
I
I TOTAL
I -
LAND USE ITE CODE ! UNITS QUANTITY I TRIPS
! I
INDUSTRIAL 130 1,000 sq ft. I 4,443,120 * 23,460
I
!
;
COMMERCIAL 820 1,000 sq ft. i 426,888 ** 23,266
i
I
OFFICE i 750 1,000 sq ft. 1,685,772 * 17,026
i
i I !
HOTEL I 400 * * *
310 rooms
;
TOTAL I 63,752
i
TABLE 20
* Limit to rate at end of database:
industrial 5 28/1,000
office 10 10/1,000
* * Multiple parcels: some may be aggregated, some may not; use 200,000 sq ft. rate
* * * Based on 200 units/hotel Hotel included in commercial rate.
H:\049029.01\ 123\Dtripgen.WK4
/9
05/02/97
PROPOSED MASTER PLAN TRIPS-DAILY
I I I
: TOTAL
LAND USE ,iTE CODE I ACRES SQ FT ! TRI PS
! I
I
INDUSTRIAL 130 129 1 3,374,157 * 17,816
!
COMMERCIAL 820 297 426,888 * * I 23,266
I
I
OFFICE I 750 I 127 1 1,416,625 * I 14,308
!
RESEARCH & DEVEL 760 423 398,341 3,178
HOTEL 310 52 400 * * * i 3,402
INSTITUTIONAL 530 I 293 N/A **** 2,352
I i
CARMAX N/A 139 42,580 978
TOTAL I 165,300
I
!
;
* Limit to rate at end of database:
industrial 5 28/1,000
office 10 10/1,000
* * Multiple parcels: some may be aggregated, some may not; use 200,000 sq ft. rate
* * * Based on 200 units/hotel
**** Trip generation based on students, 2,500 students planned for site
H:\049029.01\ 123\DPMSTR-PL.WK4
dO
05/02/97
TABLE 2D
APPROVED TRIP GENERATION-DAILY
,
!
TOTAL
LAN D USE ITE CODE UNITS QUANTITY TRIPS
! -
i 1,000 sq ft. I
INDUSTRIAL ; 130 4,443,120 * 23,460
I
I
!
;
COMMERCIAL 820 1,000 sq ft. 426,888 * * 23,266
OFFICE 750 1,000 sq ft, 1,685,772 * 1 7,026
;
!
I
HOTEL 310 rooms 400 * * * 3,402
:
TOTAL 67,154
*
Limit to rate at end of database:
industrial 528/1,000
office 10 10/1,000
** Multiple parcels: some may be aggregated, some may not, use 200,000 sq ft. rate
***
Based on 200 units/hotel Hotel included in commercial rate.
H:\049029.01\ 123\Dtripgen.WK4
;}(
05/02/97
DEPARTMENT OF
').. i
;' 11 i\PR; I II
!. il J ~ 1""'\1 q
i - >d 1
COM M U NIT V! !iF ~l~~~T~-j
~ ZO!'ili'lG QFl~...>
STATE OF FLORIDA
LAWTON CHILES
Governor
"Helping Floridians create safe, vibrant, sustainable communities"
JAMES F MURLEY
Secretary
Apnlll, 1997
Ms Tambn J Heyden, DIrector
Planmng Department
CIty of Boynton Beach
100 E Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Flonda 33425-0310
Re Quantum Park Development of RegIOnal Impact
Dear Ms Heyden
The Department has revIewed the March 17, 1997, notice of proposed change for the
Quantum Park development of regIOnal Impact (DR!) As proposed, the change IS to amend the
development order (DO) to vacate a portIOn of Quantum Boulevard and reconfigure the adjacent
lots on the master plan. In addItIon, the applIcant has further proposed to clanfy the permItted
land use categones wlthm the development at the request of the Treasure Coast RegIOnal
Planning CounCIl and the City of Boynton Beach.
The Department belIeves that the proposed changes wIll not create any addItional
regIOnal Impacts smce the traffic dIstributIOn generated from the DR! would not mcrease.
Therefore, we have concluded that the proposed changes do not constitute a substantIal deVIatIon
pursuant to the cntena speCIfied m Subparagraph 380 06(19)(e)2, Florida Statutes, and the
Department Will not object to the proposed change
flORIDA KEYS
ke4 01 Critical Stale Concern
Field Office
2796 Overseas Highway, Suire 212
Maralhon, Florida 330S(}.2227
CIEEN SWAMP
Nea 01 Critical51ate Concern
Field Office
155 East Summertin
Bartow, Florida 3383ll-4641
SOUTH flORIDA
IICOVEIY OfFICE
P.O. Box 4022
8600 N.W 36th SIreel
Miami, Florida 33159-4022
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TAllAHASSEE, flORIDA 32399 2100
Phone 904488 8466/Suncom 278 8466 FAX 904921 0781/Suncom 291 0781
Internet address http //www state fI us/comaff/dca html
~
Ms Tambn J Heyden
Apnlll, 1997
Page Two
If you have any questIOns regardmg thIS matter, please contact Greg Stuart, Planner IV,
m the Bureau of Local Planmng at (904) 487-4545
Smcerely,
(1 / ~ \ ;{j'__t, &'YJ;t/'J'-
Charles GauthIer, AICP
Growth Management AdmImstrator
CG/ggs
cc Mr James G Willard, Shutts & Bowen, LLP
Mr Mike Busha, Treasure Coast RegIonal Planmng CouncIl
d."3
05/09/199~ 14 56
9044883389
COr-1MUNIT\ AFFAIRS
PAGE 82
. ~~~--
FLORIDA ~ =a
I.^\VTO:-;<:"'J..~~ ~...
covtRNQR ~ ~
- ....
_.___~-"""':.o__-~ --, ")
r-----:-~~..o- nrT rs r'" \
'\.........\ \5 r ~ b. \, \11 G. I f] . J
I I '.':1 '.1 LS li .;;;....--,!" 'I
, ~ ....1..--~--- \ I !' ! \
\'\ u \ ' , 1\ ; \
i . 'I I'
, R~:d8~ I L:r
J4(]O \\\!o'It Cl,lIUult!rd,1I BInI 3..d n..."r '-1. l,ol...d,,~dule,
Tplfpholl~' ('1S.l) 771...&601 Fl.I.~: (95.&) 771..&61
ApnllO, 1997
Me D Ray Eubanks
Planning Manager
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Dear Mr Eubanks.
.. I 4 1997
SUBJECT
Quantum Corpora~ Park Development of Regional Impact (DRI)
City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County
DCA File Number ADA-1084-048
Notice of Proposed Change (Nope)
As requested in a letter from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council dated March 24,
1997, the Department has revlcwed the subject NOPC
The Quantum Corporate Park DR! was approved for commercIal, office, industrial, research
and development, and high school use. The NOPC proposes the followmg
. Project lots which had previously been proposed for a specific use, are beine
proposed to have the flexibility to be developed as an industrial, office, or
commercial use.
. The maximum intenSIty for any land use would not change from what has been
approved in the preVIOUS development order
. Hotel use could be substituted for commercUll use, as long as the mtenslty for
commercial use is not exceeded
. Industna! use is tleJTlg lIubstitLtted for wh:\t \Va:; formerly research a.'ld development.
. Quantum Boulevard, whIch provIdes an access to a City Park. is proposed for
abandonment.
The traffic analysis is incomplete and does not document the trip generation rates used in the
analySIS. In order not to delay the process we performed an mdependent traffic analysis
usill.& trip ~eneration rates we deemed appropriate, from the ITE Trip Generation Manual 5th
EdItion We have confirmed that the intersection of Gatewav Boulevard (N W 22nd
A venue) and Park Ridge Boulevard/High RIdge Road Will oPerate at an acceptable level of
service at full build-out, with the required Stage 4 lmp:-ovements shown In the previously
submitted traffic analysis for the Master Plan Amendment Number 6.
As a reView agency, lJ1 the future the Department will no longer perform independent traffic
analyses. If an analysis submItted for reVIew IS Incomplete andtor not fully documented, we
will reject it and the applicant will have to perform the necessary work. In order to alleViate
the potential for such delays, we would suggest that applicants coordmate WIth all review
^
dcf
e5/09/1~q~ 14 56
g044883:09
COMMUNIT\ AFF~IRS
Ft.GE 0:1
Mr D Ray Eubanlcl
April 10, 1997
Page 2
agencies regarding their proposed methodology prior to commencing the study
In additlOn. the last puagraph on page 2 of the submitted traffic analysis states that
Condition No. 4 of Ordinance No. 96-33 Section 2 is being modified to require monitoring
of trip thresholds for every site approval on Park Ridge Road. This change is not reflected
in the draft of the proposed Amended Development Order, and should be added, With the
exception of this D 0 Condillon, the Department does not object to the proposed changes.
Please fcc1 free to contact this office if you have any questIons.
OStrow
cc. Jim Snyder- TCRPC
Maria Palombo-MTP Group
Bob Romig
John Krane
FIle. 4240.20
Sl~~y, r1
C- ~/761ct~
Gustavf> Schmidt, P .E.
DiStri/t Plannin@ Manager
c?s-
EXHIBIT "E"
~&
STAFI:: RECOMMENDATION.
EXHIBIT ...
~
_" 00'll"
'\
1-
,l._ If l
"llJ II
Ii .=-:::==-=,,=1 ,.,.~ ,., =~" .~
1'1 ,.
I 1/
'I -, -, 1 1
1_ 1-, 1--,
"'~:."'"
I:
....,...
I
: ~~ -~~':~''';::-:~.~'''.:i''
1!!f-J7
.
,....
.=--!
--,
I~~ ..:~u
,-
r-:"\7"""'
---
JI
.\
Jt
'~l
I'
I"
"
,I'
I' '~I
if'
:/i'!
'II,
'iil'
I"
llh,
'I;j'
!I'I,I
1,1
'I
:illll
,:/
rf';i,li
!: I"
,. I','"
'I!,
,.,1,'
;r
'!..
II
DELETE coMMERCIAL
,
,
. ,
I.a.' "
,
,
,
, .
" '.~'
,
,
,
(,
. -
!P...JH. .,
I~ J) ,t>JO _ .___
;I ... .. .
-. .!. 1-=1!~! - -.- -.
'-~~~HJ===
i :/,"".
f '"
-
l<'
1\
t ..POlIfOo"'....IIUoI"..1O.wotn"""
...Of......~JI['llOJPoGft."CC['tIDIfroCI...
D'I' -c.......t NO . ...ttD f'II/'&
J 1lI'b.0I'W:tr." M tllUOftoG LNG U'It C~ PO.l.D Nt' ,.em ,..
,~..t~Ml>ClUJIIUllIIV'CIf''''''''''''''
..,....."telCl\llll(G...J J.......n~h_....,
COII~ CIICI,lAlRlI MtIO. . (LUll .,,_ 10'" CI'lOIS t.IAMa.I:--..
.. 10 lJ((UI .,. '01'" ~
::a...I=-:'! :.'~~..::-...:.a IID.....- .......
.... JI(JNIftlI" _ 1W'CIl....... C~ l(~hDIrt.
I .....1III11II....'~ttClMCIra'CI......_u.nl...
=r~~ ~wl\' lii:tJ~ ~~~~. == ~,:: =m'-::"" '1r
~.ltlrSCIl(...D
. == ==.:..-::- =,,~--,:, s:..:-.,::'" .:.' ::..: '110111
---------- U
-,
MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 8
MARCH 8,1197
MASTER
DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
SITE
LEGEND
- b. '"
--~-- -
I II nit t
KEY PLAN
Committed Oe.opm...'
&-
QUANTUM ASSOCIATES
Nallonol Cllr Cenler
115 West WashIngton SI.
Indianapolis. IN 46204
(317) 636-1600
Cl)I,IU (C...",...c"') 13.53 Acrtl
INll (lndull,loI) 10." Ac,..
G .. I IG.........tnl../lMlltvllon..) SO... Ac'..
OfT (Ofne.) 11_," Aer..
01 (Ofllc:./trIdll,trloll) '03.2!t Acr..
Ole (OlllcIl\ndull,loIlt_clol) 10853 Ac<..
Wetlonds 6_00 "ern
Sand P.,. R....... 4~_OO Acr..
Roadt .t.13 Acr..
OPEN SPAc[~
Por..
,........
10.17 Ac'..
Note: Lots with handwritten land use designations noted on them are lots
Impacted by this amendment. The handwritten land use Is the current approved
land use, The typed land use designation, on those lots with no handwritten land
use designation, Is the current approved land use.
~7
T
EXHIBIT "F"
d8
EXHIBIT "F"
ConditIOns of Approval
Project name' Quantum Park
File number' MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
Reference' The plans consist of I_sheet identified as 1 st Submittal. Master Plan ModificatIOn. File # MPMD
97-001/DRIA 97-001
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments. None
UTILITIES
Comments.
1 The analYSIS submitted by Klmley-Horn regarding the water and sewer
impacts of proposed land use changes assumed a rather low intensity
water and sewer usage for the commercial land use category Whereas
this may have been a reasonable assumption for the Carmax site which
was under consideration that that time the analysis was submitted, the
numbers used would be much too low for more mtenslve uses such as
restaurants. The anticipated usage for Industrial sites is also rather low,
and is based upon occupancy by a warehouse-type usage, and makes no
allowance for a high intensity water user (such as BGI).
The analysis submitted to date only mcluded those proposed changes
along Park Ridge Boulevard. A SimIlar analysis. but With appropriately
reVised flow figures. shall be submitted for all the affected lots. Sewer
flows must be grouped by the lIft station service area. so that the
UtilIties Department can determme If a 11ft station upgrade Will be
reqUIred.
The adoptIOn of a more generic type of land use designation, while
increasing the flexibility of marketmg the park, may also establish
conflicting impacts in close prOXimity (such as office uses sandwiched
between two industrial facilities) The onginal concept of this park was
to allocate each related usage to a dlstmct area. ThiS type of genenc
deSignation also will require a more mtenslve review of each site plan
so as to determme the actual Impacts on the water and sewer systems,
and evaluate those Impacts agamst actual capacity m the delIvery
systems. Staff Will be reqUIred to track the demand of each parcel, so
as to determine when system capacity IS reached. With the ongmal
plan, adequate capacity factors were deSigned mto the system. Those
factors will likely be exceeded With the ImplementatIOn of widespread
commercial land use
Any upgrades required to the water and sewer systems due to this
mtenslfication ofland use must be performed at the applicant's expense.
(Sec.26-28).
2. The portion of Quantum Boulevard for which the applicant IS requesting
abandonment contams water and sewer mam lines that cannot be
abandoned. The water main IS part of an mtegrallooped system serving
all ofthe facilities on Quantum Blvd., and ItS disruptIOn would reduce
fire flow capability The gravity sewer also serves eXlstmg busmesses.
We would require at mmimum, that an easement be dedicated over the
entue right-of-way so as to assure contmued access and mamtenance to
our system. Once the lots are reconfigured, an alternate system can be
designed and constructed by the applicant, after Utility Department
approval, so as to mamtam unmterrupted service to the area.
FIRE
Comments.
3 The Fire Department takes exceptIOn to the proposed vacating of
dCJ
Page 2
Quantum Park
File No. MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Quantum Blvd. and recommends denial. Without any alternate routes
proposed, the Fire Department feels that without the mput of park
tenants and neighbors, the Fire Department would do a disservice to the
citizens of Boynton given the experience with responses on Gateway
Blvd., at peak hours.
POLICE
Comments. None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments
4 The future vacating and closing of Quantum Blvd. per the applicant's
request will create a dead-end road from Gateway Blvd. some 2500 feet
long. The maximum allowable length of a dead-end street IS 1320 feet
per Chapter 6 of the LDR (page 6-11) Therefore, closing of Quantum
Blvd. is not recommended.
5 If the Commission approves the vacatmg of the subject portion of
Quantum Blvd, It is recommended to deed Lot 31 to the City for park
purposes and relocate and construct Quantum Blvd. northward along the
E-4 canal to intersect Miner Road, mcludmg buffenng along the canal.
ThiS prOVides not only an effiCient access to the park and Gateway
Blvd., but also faster response time
6 Revise note 5 ofthe master plan to indicate that a city approval of an
abandonment apphcation will be reqUIred to close Quantum Blvd.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments. None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments.
7 Blocking of Quantum Blvd. ehmmatmg the western portIOn of the loop
road will Impact the proposed Quantum City Park and is not
recommended. The master plan for this park includes an entrance way
and parking on the south portIOn of the park. Due to the awkward shape
of this property, parkmg for some of the playmg fields in park is located
near the southern entrance Smce the shape ofthe property also does
not allow for a through road to Miner Road, closing off a portion of
Quantum Blvd. will cause viSitors to the park to decide in advance
which fields they are going to utihze People coming from the west
who are planmng to use the south playing fields will be forced to drive
out of their way to get to that field.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments.
8 There are numerous natural resource areas on the Quantum Corporate
Park properties that have not been properly maintamed. These areas
include the 40 acre Sand Pme preserve, the Wetlands, the lakes, the
individual lots microsltes and roadway medlans/r o.w's The applicant
shall submit a comprehensive mamtenance schedule to systematically
address each of the above locations to perform the proper mamtenance.
The above locations which are adjacent to parcels at Quantum Park
under development, should be the pnonty for maintenance.
Carmax Sand Pine preserve
B G.!. ~and Pine preserve
JO
Page 3
Quantum Park
File No. MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Hampton Inn. Lake adjoining parcel
Flowers Bakery Wetlands
All projects. Roadway medians, row
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments.
9 Gateway Boulevard shall be wIdened wIth two additIOnal lanes at a time
reqUIred by the regional planmng councIl and Palm Beach County
10 Master plan shall be revised to mclude 1,430,000 GF A of office.
11 Revise master plan to mclude a maximum of 400 hotel rooms.
12. Add to the master plan the p.m. peak hour trip generatIon of the project.
13 Annual momtonng at the mtersection of Gateway Boulevard and Park
RIdge Boulevard shall be performed at the end of every year to
determine when and what Improvements are needed to maintam the
intersection at the adopted level of servIce.
15 Delete mdustnal on lots 3, 22-31 and 6-11
15 Add mdustnal on lots 12-14
16 Delete commercial on lots 17-19,21,39,52,56,57, 72, 70, 69, 73A,
73B, 74, 75, 81, 82, 83-85, 68A and 68B
17 Delete commercIal, but retam hotel use on lots 66, 67 A and 67C
18 Add office to lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38
19 To improve the appearance of potentIal industrial buildmgs along
Gateway Boulevard, in addItIon to complIance with the CIty'S
Commumty DeSIgn Plan, bUIldmgs shall be designed to mcorporate
window openmgs (sImulated If not actual), glass blocks, wall offsets,
extenor fimsh matenal dIfferentiation, ceramic tIles or other accent
features, and stucco Joints.
20 If commercial development is approved on parcels 83, 84, and/or 85,
and access from said parcels IS provIded to High RIdge Road, the CIty
may request an update of the traffic study dated June 10, 1996 to
evaluate the order and thresholds oftnp generatIOn whIch define the
tIming of improvements outlIned m that study If the updated study
shows the need to modIfY the stagmg of such Improvements, then such
modIficatIOn wIll be made a condItIon of approval of site development
for the parcel or parcels m question or of another site mutually agreed to
by the CIty and the developer
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
21 To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
22. To be determined.
/bme
s:\projects\cond of appr\
~I
REQUEST FOR PUBLISHING
LEGAL NOTICES AND/OR LEGAL ADVERTISEMENTS
A completed copy of this routing slip must accompany any request to have a Legal Notice or
Legal Advertisement published and must be submitted to the Office of the City Attorney eight
(8) working days prior to the first publishing date requested below
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning and Zoning Department
PREPARED BY Tambri J. HeYden DATE PREPARED' April 30.1997
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NOTICE OR AD' Quantum Park notice of proposed change to the
DRI development order to change the master plan land use designation of lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
11,22,23,24.25.26,27.28.29,30.31,2.3.15, 16,40A, 1,66, 67A.67C. 12, 13, 14,32,33,
34A, 34B. 35, 36. 37. 38,17.18.19.21.39,52,81.82.83,84,85,40.58,59.60. 61. 62, 86,
87, 88. 89A, 89B. 90B,65A. 65B,67B,91,63,64,90A,68A,68B,56,57,69, 70, 72. 73A, 73B,
74.75, 46A. 48A. 48B, 48C. 50A. SOB, 51B. 51D, 76. 77, 78, 79 and 80 and sever Quantum
Boulevard between lots 22 and 31 and lots 6 through 11.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS (Size of Headline, Type Size, Section
Placement, Black Border, etc.)
Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 (19) (f) of Florida Statues, there appears to be no special
reauirements.
SEND COPIES OF AD TO Planning & Zoning Dept.. Quantum Associates, Agent: James G.
Willard, Newspaper, City Attorney
NEWSPAPER(S) TO PUBLISH The Post (newspaper of general circulation), since this is a
proiect of regional impact.
DATE(S) TO BE PUBLISHED Minimum once, 15 days prior to public hearing date of May 20,
1997, Le. May 5. 1997.
APPROVED BY
5tr!f1
(mat )
(2)
(City Attorney)
(Date)
(3)
(City Manager)
(Date)
RECEIVED BY CITY CLERK.
COMPLETED'
s. \projects\quantum\legal notices \legal-DR I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that City Commission of THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, will conduct a Public Hearing at 7 00 P M or as soon thereafter as the agenda
permits on Tuesday, May 20, 1997, in the City Hall Commission Chambers, 100 East Boynton
Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida. The purpose of this public hearing is to consider a
proposed change to the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Development Order (Ordinance No
84-51) as amended by Ordinances Nos 86-11, 86-37 and 88-3, 94-10, 94-51, 96-33 and 96-65
and determination as to whether or not the proposed change constitutes a substantial deviation
to the approved development order with respect to the property described below located within
the corporate limits of said City, pursuant to the request of the parties in interest and in
compliance with Chapter 380, Florida Statutes
REQUEST QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH DRI
Formerly Boynton Beach Park of Commerce
Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A Tract of land lying partially in Sections 16, 17, 20 and 21, Township 45
South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, said Tract being
more particularly described as follows. Commencing at the Southwest
corner of said Section 17, thence North 1 E44'39" East, along the West
line of Section 17, a distance of 1318 10 feet to a point in the intersection
with the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, as recorded in 0 R. Book 1738,
Page 1686, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, thence
with a bearing of North 89E04'32" East, along the centerline of N W 22nd
Avenue, a distance of 778 37 feet to the Point of Beginning, thence North
1 E44'39" East, a distance of 1247 06 feet to the South right of way line of
L.W D D Lateral 21, thence North 89E08'49" East along the South right
of way line L.W D D Lateral 21, as recorded in 0 R. Book 1732, Page
612, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, a distance of
635 93 feet to the centerline of the L. W D D Equalizing Canal E-4, as
recorded in 0 R. Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public Records of Palm
Beach County, Florida, thence along the centerline of the above
described E-4 Canal with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of
North 10E32'52" East, a radius of 750 00 feet, a central angle of
4E04'17", and an arc length of 5329 feet; thence continue along the
centerline of the E-4 Canal, with a bearing of North 12E35'OO" East, a
distance of 320 69 feet to a point of curve, thence with a curve to the left
having a radius of 650000, a central angle of 3E28'30", and an arc length
of 394.23 feet; thence North 9E06'30" East, a distance of 1979 16 feet to
a point on the North Line of Section 17, thence with a bearing of North
89E16'39" East, along the North line of Section 17, a distance of 196450
feet; thence South OE02' 11" East, a distance of 2625 18 feet; thence
North 89E08'49" East, a distance of 368 96 feet to a point on the North
right of way line of N W 22nd Avenue as recorded in 0 R. Book 1738,
Page 1686 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, thence
South 19E27'31" East, a distance of 50 00 feet to the centerline of N W
22nd Avenue, thence with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of
North 75E29'49" East, a radius of 163702 feet, a central angle of
9E53'58", and an arc length of 282.85 feet to a point; thence north
12E02'41" East, a distance of 915 72 feet; thence NorthOE31'11" East, a
distance of 39970 feet; thence North 89E12'37" East, a distance of
41321 feet; thence South 88E22'56" East, a distance of 134970 feet to
a point on the West right of way line of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad;
thence South OE28'21" East, along the West right of way line of the
Railroad, a distance of 130909 feet to a point on the centerline of N W
22nd Avenue, thence North 88E27'31" West, along the centerline of N W
22nd Avenue a distance of 672.97 feet; thence South OE33'53" East, a
distance of 130669 feet; thence South 88E45'31" East, a distance of
333 51 feet to a point on the West right of way of the Seaboard Coastline
Railroad, thence with a bearing of South 14E08'23" West, along the West
right of way of the railroad, a distance of 131249 feet; thence South
OE33'53" East, a distance of 26 69 feet; thence South 13E 15'22" West, a
distance of 920 57 feet; thence North 88E50'04" West, a distance of
18760 feet; thence with a bearing North OE49'21" West, a distance of
20000 feet; thence North 88E50'04" West, a distance of 21800 feet;
thence South OE49'21" East, a distance of 20000 feet; thence North
88E50'04" West, a distance of 4000 feet; thence South OE49'21" East a
distance of 556 84 feet; thence North 88E50'04" West, a distance' of
361726 feet to a point on the centerline of the above described
centerline. of the E-4 Canal; thence with a bearing of North 5E18'14"
West, a dIstance of 153 13 feet, thence with a curve to the right having a
Page 2
Quantum Park - Notice of Public Hearing
radius of 450 00 feet, a central angle of 15E36'44", and an arc length of
122.62 feet; thence North 10E18'30" East, a distance of 988 60 feet to a
point of curve, thence with a curve to the left having a radius of 450 00
feet, a central angle of 18E20'OO", and an arc length of 143 99 feet;
thence with a bearing of North 8E01'30" West, a distance of 125514
feet to a point on the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, thence with a
bearing of South 89E04'32" West, along the centerline of N W 22nd
Avenue a distance of 81785 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning
Containing 591 55 acres more or less and subject to easements and
rights of way of record.
591 55 AC
51 70 AC
539 85 AC
GROSS LAND AREA OF QUANTUM PARK
LESS ROADWAY & CANAL
RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD
NET LAND AREA OF QUANTUM PARK
Together with the addition of all land (lots 80, 81 and 82) lying within the
plat of the P C D Center, containing 13 17 acres, as recorded in Plat
Book 60, Pages 106 and 107, of the Public Records of Palm Beach
County, Florida, for a total proposed net land area of 55302 acres.
PROPOSED
CHANGES 1)
Change in traffic distribution due to possible future severing of
Quantum Boulevard between lots 22 and 31 and lots 6 through
11
2) Change in the master plan designation of lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,2,3, 15, 16 and 40A from
office to office/industrial use,
3) Change in the master plan designation of lots 1, 66, 67 A and 67C
from office/hotel use to office/industrial/commercial use,
4) Change in the master plan designation of lots 12, 13 and 14 from
office/research and development to office use,
5) Change in the master plan designation of lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B,
35, 36, 37 and 38 from office/industrial to industrial use,
6) Change in the master plan designation of lots 17, 18, 19, 21, 39,
52, 81, 82, 83, 84 and 85 from office to office/industrial/
commercial use,
7) Change in the master plan designation of lot 40 from
office/government and institutional to government and institutional
use,
8) Change in the master plan designation of lots 58, 59, 60, 61 AND
62 from industrial/research and development to office/industrial
use,
9) Change in the master plan designation of lots 86, 87, 88, 89A,
89B and 90B from research and development to office/industrial
use,
10) Change in the master plan designation of lots 65A, 65B, 67B and
91 from office/hotel/commercial to office/industrial/commercial
use,
11) Change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 from
office/commercial to office/industrial/commercial use,
12) Change in the master plan designation of lot 90A from research
and development to government and institutional use,
13) Change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 68B from
research and development to office/industrial/commercial use,
14) Change in the master plan designation of lots 56, 57 69, 70, 72,
73A, 73B 74 and 75 from industrial to office/industrial/commercial
use,
Page 3
Quantum Park - Notice of Public Hearing
15) Change in the master plan designation of lots 46A, 48A, 488,
48C, 50A, 50B, 51 Band 510 from industrial to office/industrial
use,
16) Change in the master plan designation of lots 76, 77, 78 and 79
from industrial/commercial to commercial use, and
17) Change in the master plan designation of lot 80 from office to
commercial use,
APPLICANT Quantum Associates
AGENT
James G Willard, Esquire
Shutts & Bowen
All interested parties are notified to appear at said hearing in person or by attorney and be
heard Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the City Commission with respect to
any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such
purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
PUBLISH
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
(561 )375-6260
The Post
May 5, 1997
s \projects\quantum\legal notices\legal-DRI