Loading...
AGENDA DOCUMENTS j . __ .11 CIT"Y OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Meetine: Dates in to City Manae:er's Office Meeting Dates in to CitY Manae:er's Office 0 May 6, 1997 ApriI25,1997(noon) 0 July 1, 1997 June 20, 1997 (noon) 0 May 20, 1997 May 9 1997 (noon) 0 July 15, 1997 July 3, 1997 (Thursday noon) I2l June 3,1997 May 23, 1997 (noon) 0 August 5, 1997 July 25. 1997 (noon) o June 17 1997 June 6, 1997 (noon) 0 August 19 1997 August 8, 1997 (noon) RECOMMENDA TION Please place the request below on the June 3, 1997 City Commission meeting under Legal, Ordinances, Second Reading for approval as written. EXPLANA TION An ordinance amending the Quantum Park DR! development order was approved on fIrst reading at the May 20 1997 City Commission meeting with revisions. The revisions have been incorporated in the attached ordinance. The DR! amendment application, necessitating this ordinance, was submitted by James Willard on behalf of Quantum Associates to request the following master plan changes in lot use (this list reflects the commercial, industrial and Quantum Boulevard adjustments to the application Mr Willard requested at the last City Commission meeting): Change in the master plan designation oflots 6, 7,8,9,10 11 2, 15, 16, 17 18, 19,21,39 40A, 52, 83, 84, and 85 from office to office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lot I from office/botel use to office/industriaVcommercial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 12, 13 and 14 from office/research and development to office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 76,81 and 82 from industriaVcommercial to office/industriaV commercial use; change in the master plan designation of lot 40 from office/government and institutional to government and institutional use; change in the master plan designation of lots 58, 59 60 61 and 62 from industriaVresearch and development to office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 86 87 88, 89A, 89B and 90B from research and development to office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 65A, 65B, 67B and 91 from office/hoteVcommercial to office/industriaVcommercial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 from offIce/commercial to office/industriaVcommercial use; change in the master plan designation of lot 90A from research and development to government and institutional use; change In the master plan designation of lots 68A and 68B from research and development to office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 46A, 48A, 48B, 48C, 50A, 50B, SIB, SID 56,57,69,70, 72, 73A, 73B, 74 and 75 from industrial to office/industrial use. change in the master plan designatIon of lots 77 78, 79 and 80 from industriaVcommercml to commercial use and change In the master plan designation of lots 66, 67 A and 67C from office/botel use to offIce/hoteVindustrial use, PROGRAM IMPACT N/ A FISCAL IMPACT N/ A ALTERNATIVES. N/ A S ,Planning\SHARED\WP\AGENDAS\CIITCOMM\Agenda Item Request Ordinance Quantum DRl.doc CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Department Head's Signature City Manager's Signature Development Services Department Name ~ ~ -..::::~'-n-L-lL.~ b{ Planning and Zonin S .Planning\SHARED\ WP\AGENDAS\CITYCOMM\Agenda Item Request Ordinance Quantum DRl.doc .. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Meetinl! Dates in to City Manal!er s Oftice Meetinl! Dates in to City Manal!er's Office o May 6,1997 April 25 1997 (noon) 0 July I 1997 June 20, 1997 (noon) IZI May 20, 1997 May 9 1997 (noon) 0 July 15 1997 July 3 1997 (Thursday noon) o June 3,1997 May 23, 1997 (noon) 0 August 5 1997 July 25 1997 (noon) o June 17 1997 June 6, 1997 (noon) 0 August 19 1997 August 8, 1997 (noon) RECOMMENDATION Please place the request below on the May 20, 1997 City Commission meeting under Public Hearing. The Planning and Development Board, with a 6-1 vote, recommends approval of the Quantum Park DRI amendment and master plan modification, subject to all staff comments in Exhibit "F" - Conditions of Approval with the exception of comments 7,8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17 and 19 and revisions to comments 1 and 16 relative to incomplete utility system analysis and deleting commercial use on various lots. Regarding comment 8 (lack of maintenance of the sand pine preserve and other landscape areas), staff agrees to delete this comment and will refer this lack of compliance to Code Enforcement. Regarding comments 9-13 (traffic), staff has received the attached rebuttal from the RPC They area holding fast to comments 9-13, therefore staff recommends that they not be deleted. Regarding comments 16 and 19 (commercial use option on additional lots ), staff strongly maintains that no additional commercial lots be allowed. Regarding comment 19 staff agrees to delete this comment and add it as a condition of future site plan approval for industrial lots along Gateway Lastly, an ordinance is scheduled for first reading at the May 20th City Commission meeting as well, which is necessary to amend the Quantum Park DRI development order The recommended conditions of approval are inserted in the ordinance and are recommended for approval. For further details pertaining to this request, see attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 97-213 EXPLANA TlON Project: Quantum Park PID Agent: James G Willard and Bowen LLP Owner. Quantum Associates Location West side of the intersection of Interstate 95 and Gateway Boulevard DESCRIPTION Request to amend the previously approved PID master plan in connection with an amendment to the DRI as follows. Change in traffic distribution due to possible future severing of Quantum Boulevard between lots 22 and 31 and lots 6 through 11, and change in the master plan designation of lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 22, 23 24 25,26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31,2, 3, 15, 16 and 40A from office to office/industrial use; of lots 1, 66, 67 A and 67C from office/hotel use to office/industrial/ commercial use; of lots 12, 13 and 14 from office/research and development to office use; lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 from office/industrial to industrial use, of lots 17 18, 19 21 39 52, 81 82, 83, 84 and 85 from office to office/industrial/ commercial use; of lot 40 from office/government and institutional to government and institutional use; change in the master plan designation of lots 58, 59, 60, 61and 62 from industrial/research and development to office/industrial use, change in the master plan designation of lots 86, 87, 88, 89A, 89B and 90B from research and development to office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 65A, 65B, 67B and 91 from office/hotel/commercial to office/industrial/commercial use, change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 from office/commercial to office/industrial/ commercial use, change in the master plan designation of lot 90A from research and development to government and institutional use; change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 68B from research and development to office/industrial/ commercial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 56, 57, 69, 70, 72, 73A, S'\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC .. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM 73B, 74 and 75 from industrial to office/industrial/commercial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 46A, 48A, 48B, 48C, 50A, 50B, 5IB and 51 D from industrial to office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 76 77, 78 and 79 from industrial/commercial to commercial use, and change in the master plan designation of lot 80 from office to commercial use. PROGRAM IMPACT N/A FISCAL IMPACT N/A ALTERNATIVES. N/A .-----. --:::- h-1' 'J t. t/?-o( Department Head City Manager's Signature Department Name Page 2 of2 S:\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC ADDITIONAL AGENDA BACK UP XI LEGAL B ORDINANCES - 1st Reading THIS ORDINANCE IS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA BUT DOES NEED TO BE INCLUDED PLEASE ADD TO LEGAL ORDINANCES FOR 1 ST READING '1j-/~' 1: flY' - ~ 1\; ';;' / 13 ju- r r~J JJ,Vh--.. ,-V, .... . , ,. I /.-';. ../-1:::-7"-' ~U ,I . tM'?f ~ ''- C' /{: ( , ORDINANCE NO 97- v' /j ! 1 r L--- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A DETERMINATION THAT CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT APPROVED IN ORDINANCE NO 84-51 AND AMENDED IN ORDINANCES NOS 86-11 86-37, 88-3, 94- 10, 94-51, 96-33 AND 96-65 DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION UNDER CHAPTER 38006, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1996, DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW IS NECESSARY REGARDING SUCH CHANGES, APPROVING SUCH CHANGES, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ORDINANCE NOS 84-51 86-11 86-37, 88-3, 94-10, 94-51, 96- 33 AND 96-65) FOR PURPOSES OF INCORPORATING THE APPROVED CHANGES, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Riteco Development Corporation, a Florida corporation ("Riteco") filed with the City of Boynton Beach (the "City") an Application for Development Approval of Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact (the "ADA") on May 21,1984, regarding that certain property (the "Property") described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of hereof' an:f WHEREAS, the ADA was approved and the Development Order for the Property was granted December 18. 1984 pursuant to Ordinance No 84-51 (the "Development Order") , and WHEREAS. Riteco subsequently conveyed its right. title and interest in and to the Property to Boynton Park of Commerce, Inc., a Florida corporation ("Boynton Park"), and, Boynton Park. in turn. subsequently conveyed its right, title and interest in and to the Property to Quantum Associates. a Florida general partnership (the "Developer"); and WHEREAS, Developer filed with the City respective applications to amend the Development Order, which applications were approved by the City in Ordinance No. 86-11, Ordinance No. 86-37. Ordinance No. 88-3. Ordinance No, 94-10. Ordinance No. 94-51, Ordinance No. 96-33. and Ordinance No. 96-65, and 'WHEREAS, the term "Development Order" includes all amendments thereto; and WHEREAS. Developer is the curTent owner and developer of the remaining vacant land within the Property (commonly known aa the Quantum Corporate Park at Boynton Beach Development of RegiOnallmpad. or the Quantum Park DRI); and WHEREAS, Developer has submitted to the City a Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("NOpe.) requesting a further amendment to the Development Order for the purpose of revising the Master Site Development Page 1 of 4 .... . Plan as follows. Shang.. in tr3#ie distribution Jue to possible future seve, if I!:I of Quantum- Boulevard bet\"Icefl lots 22 and 31 dlld lots 6 through i 1 -ea.d change in the master plan ~ t q designation of lots 6, 7 8, 9 10 11 ,~ .2i,~~ 2, f 15 16j!a~d 4~A ,r 'PI! 3~1 ~'f'~ ~~~'- ~ X, from office to office/industrial use, ~~ of lot~ 1 '. ~ _ . .' from office/hotel use to !~ 1l.:;. {"- d..t YyL(,~~~ :L~",- office/industrial/, commercial usef-orl3'ts 12, 13 and 14 from office/research and developm.ent to '. tL- . J (.'\' /I /J:,.v-.t.'f',.J,i.-:, J - tflJ' I w~~ officel'use U;;r M, ,"<if',] ,[., ':'J, He1T ,...-:-.J .,.!!'".J}'vm prlt~!t".1 te i"'~~1 ;.d ao8{/Of lots ,j'bL ---)/ - . I . ~ . J.. " .. h /) " tf...-<t";.,-,,,j ~ t1--c'- {) J.- I ,J.~..::t-vJ'- '~-<.L~ ~~.~ "",' J: ..t:"~~1, ~"ilM: 8S-,......1i~.~ &6 fromJPM- to office/industrial/ commercial use /lOT G#w, lot 40 from office/government and institutional to government and institutional use ....ctlan _ the mast~lan designatioo of lots 58 59, 60, 61 and 62 from industrial/research and development to office/industrial use, change in the mas{61 ~n de~i!:lnatton of lots 86, 87 88 89A, 898 and 908 from research and development to office/industrial use, change in the master plan designation of lots 65A, 65B, 67B and 91 from office/hotel/commercial to . office/industrial/commercial use, change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 \ from office/commercial to office/industrial/ commercial use, change in the master plan \ 1 ) designation of lot 90A from research and development to government and institutional use, J I I I ~, . 'UA. ~, ~ iRd ~ ~-<<~ Ul '-~<'9qRdYdr:iaIlQ8~M=r.i=~ YIS; change in the p, 74 7'- I ~ ?,J1t/i1 Ie ;"]-.J...}'-itf/1-"', ' , ,I master plan designation of lots 46A, 48A, 48B, 48C, 50A, SOB ~~ 51DAfrom industrial to \ ' t.~d~ office/industrial use; change in the mast~r pl~n cte~ignat~on ~f lots. 77, 78 .a,wa 79/lfrom. . '<2- \ ,:A ~'~,,- -0'- ~-4~~:-~~ t:~-- "LA -" t , ...it. :Jt_~ t.. G) (- I A '-:f ":. '. \ industrial/commercial to commercial ~se,^1~'"l.<;r... - !YF~~ J,->&1...U.- ;~1.c..''ft; " -~ J4~""';-<, j-Y~<. -<.",J' ~/ ~ .trom office to com'l1ercial ute (see Exhibit "B" - Master Plan Amendment NO.8 to the Master ~J c7-o Site Development Plan for Quantum Park, dated McpigA 6,1997), and change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 68B from research and development to office/industria~use; ~~1tMn"i\I&ler~R3t~~",__,., 10, WHEREAS, the City Commission of Boynton Beach, as the governing body having jurisdiction, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for amendments to development orders approving developments of regional impact pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996), and , WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered the testimony, reports and other documentary evidence submitted at said public hearing by Developer, the City staff and the public, and the City Planning and Development Board's recommendations of the 13" day of May, 1997, and' WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered all of tHe forgoing. Page 2 of 4 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT Section 1 A notice of public hearing was duly published on the 5th day of May, 1997, in the Palm Beach Post, a newspaper of general circulation in Boynton Beach, Florida, pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes, and proof of said publication has been duly filed It) ~~ bl1ue- I (; d:-4P/~IfL ~ . A ~ J..- It <-l--tJL jA;..J.:r }.....&L-Lk' ~~) fvdL~L~ A /!d) L.-. -- ~- f..<< Y\. C4[7 _'~~ ~ -/~~ ~d- - :AI.. U/ ' ~. . ,~JcFf ~I'ft' 9) Annual man' oring at t 'tersection 0 eway Boul e end P~id~e r) I) ~- \ BO~~rd II be no at the nd of e ery y r to de ne when and, r~ I I ~_ . ~. j prrfv,: ent are n t aintain th . ersection at the adopted i:~Jl t t. level 0 _Nice. ~'I 1.' , ,... _ t -t!-:-. 'Yr~~-f~ ~f'o/--"7-e ') ., ~ 7~ /. ~h) B8*8 ladllll<ialon-Iots 3, 22-~ .n . . III f f) ,J. - j-- . I' 2-14 {', (..-0 Uf// J A:1~A/ ~. . . .. .. '" ,r-:---- ~ . ,0-- )/,/".1-' \. l/./.v<-l..)/.j' . '1 ", j) Delete comme~~~'~",-JZ:! n, 7G..'~~~, ~ ./JJ. -z/....1- .e~--- r-v.~[,...u/ ~. *". '. ~t~ ,~ '. , ~ 0 ~j ~' LA./L . p..t..~ --k} DelAte commercial, but !"Ahlin hGtoll;lS8 OR lots 66, 87 A 8"d 67C;-~- Juri,/~ t) I A:: )Y1 ,/ ./ , . ..J , o)ilv) jf- ,-^- ~ ,.--:- Ji'jl~l-'\:'-. .~ p <. J,)/ tv L i' '" C...~_t' rJ v, /JY ll>~ ,j')/ '.' r ll.,~.~ i- ~. '(,- ~.~rf'<V ~vl 'y ~ fr'- ~./" f \ ,) L tA,.t/1, ~ \i.- Section 3. Upon consideration of all matters described in Section 380.06, Florida 1 J1~' \ f X j/'.I~'}~11 Statutes (1996), it is hereby determined that ;/ \ rt:/O^ a It-' 1 f'/ \1J--f" I I' '"t/ i V r IfC; ," ~~.. · - J)I'1Y Y1 >"",U , Ci'l} V >, Jf1' v~ f l,t'- ,~).,.. LV' Section 2. The Development Order shall be amended to include the following provisions 1 Master Plan Amendment No 8 to the Master Site Development Plan for MJ d-c.-""> [Jr;/:'> VU~ Quantum Park. dated MarilP"6, 1997, is hereby approved.. -su~er" ~ ..Jglle'l..il,~ lOonditionS. 'a)Q , J~~~e !ras~ pi vaO"ui~rJ/ ~5i:. ~'m o e) ise s la de a a~f ~<?JeffOomL... ./ f}~~~~~on~e11roject. ~ office to lots 32. 33, 34&-34&, 3S, 3&;" 37 and 38. ~ If commercial ~ijelopme~t is a~prov ~n pa~cels 83, I an~or ,and . 'acanss fro sal i arce ,IS pr Ided 1 0 HIgh R e Ro . ,t e city, II I req~.st a.~pd..'..te Oft..~ltra~itud...'I d ted J~~O, 1.' 96 0 ev ua the! ~rde~. and ~reshol~s Of.t,p le"n+ration hict{~;he t~ tim ng / l~pravemel1ts ,.outl~ed I~t sEJY If he pdatE the "" to modify. the ~taQing Pf., ! su mp~ v~!11e , en s modifi on will Jmad a con~idon Qf appr<>>val site d lopm for the reel or parcels i \ question or of another site mutually agreed to by the city and the developer Page 3 of 4 ,., ~ A. The amendments proposed by Developer do not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to this area. S The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations, subject to the conditions outlined above C The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, subject to the conditions outlined above D The amendments proposed by Developer do not create any additional regional impacts and therefore do not constitute a substantial deviation under Chapter 38006, Florida Statutes (1996) Section 4 The City Commission has concluded as a matter of law that these proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996), that Developer is entitled to the relief prayed and applied for and that the Development Order is hereby amended incorporating the amendments proposed by Developer as set forth in Section 2 above. Section 5 Except as otherwise amended herein, the Development Order shall remain in full force and effect. Section I. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 7 Should any section or provision of this ordinance or portion hereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this ordinance. Section 8. Authority is hereby granted to codify said ordinance. Section 9 This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage, I FIRST READING this day of SECOND READING and FINAL PASSAGE this ,1997 day of ,1997 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Page 4 of 4 MAYOR ATTEST CITY CLERK (CORPORATE SEAL) EXHISITS "An - Legal Description "sn - Amended Master Site Development ~Ian S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\ORDINANC\ORI 1997doc.doc ---------- ) .'\[J~ V 0 AV \ 'c/., I I II 101 ;j . ., ~~ 01 I /1 7 }. 11/[ (') I ( 1117 Page 5 of 4 ..., ~ EXHIBIT "A" - - OV8RALL BOUNDARY LEq~L DBSCRIPTIOg A Traet of land lY1n9 p.~ti.l1, in .eetton. ,., 11, 30 and 31 Townlhip .. .au.h, ~.n,e .3 ...t, ..1. .e.ch eounty, florid, ..id Traat betn, .o~e particUI.rll de..~ib.d .. 'allow. Co...n.ln. .. ~h. 'oueh"el~ oorner 0 .a1d .eatton 11; thence North 1-..' 3." I..t, along the We.' li..e of .ectton 11, I di.tanae 01 131..10 !.et to a p01nt 1n the int.r.ection with th4 oent.rlin. o' H.W. 12nd Avenue, .. reGarded in O.R. aook 1131, P.,e 1.'., 01 tbe pub1io Record. 01 ..1. ...ob County, florid_; thenae with . b.arinG 01 HOI:'III ".04 t 32" I..~, along th<< eenter1in. af H.W. 22nd Avenue, a d1.tane. of 1".3' feet to th, Polnt of Se,1nn1n" thence North 1....3'. ...t, a di.tanee of 12".0' f.et to the South ri9ht of way llne of L.W.D.D. Lateral 21; thence Horth S'008"'" last along the lou~h riqht of wa~ line L.W.D.D. Lateral 21, a. recorded in O.R. Book 1732, Pa~e 612, of the public Records of 'al. Beach county, Florida, a dietance of 635.93 f.et to the centerline of the L W.D 0 Equalizing Canal 1-4, aa recorded ln O.R. Book 1132, 'ag, 612, of the Public Recorda of Pal. Beach county, Florida, thence clang the centerline of the above d..cribed 1-4 canal wt~ a curve to ~he right bavin, a chord bearing ot North 10032 If .a.t, a radiu. of 150.00 feet, a central an91. of 4004'17", and an arc lenqth of 53.21 fe.t, thenee continue along the centerline of the 1-4 canal, with a bearinq of Horth 12D35'00" East, a diatance of 320.69 f.et to a point of curve, thence with a curve to the left havin, a radlu8 of 1500.00, a central angle of J028 t 30", and an are length of 3'..23 feet; thence North 9006'30. Ba.t, a di.tance of 1919.16 f.et to a point on th~ lIorth Line of section 11: thence with . bearinCJ of north 89016'J9" la.t, alonq the Horth lin. of aection 11, a di8tance of 196'.50 feet, thence south O.OZ'll" Bait, a diltance of 2625.18 feet, thence Horth 89008"'- .a.t, . di.tance of 368 96 I fe.t to a point OD the llorth ri9ht of way l1ne of N.W. :!2nd Avenue a. recorded tn O.R. Book 113', .av. 1'" of the Publtc I Recocde 01 'a1. .eacb eounty, rlorida, tbenc. Soutb 19021' 3l .. ,Iaat. . diataftc:e ot 50 00 feet to the centerline of N.W. 22nd Ave_. &bena. "Lith a curve to the I'ight havin, a chord bearl119 ot -.ceb 15.Z".'" Baat, a radiu, of 1131.0Z feet, . central an91. of '-53'5.", and an are length of 282.85 feet to a point, thence north 12.0Z'.1" Bast, a dletance of 915.12 feet; ther~e North 0.31'11" la.t, . di.tance of 399.10 f.et; thence No . 89012'31" laat, a diatance of 413.21 feetlthen South 88022'56" Eaat, a d1.tance of 13'9.10 feet to . polnt on the West right of way line of the Seaboard coastllne Railroad, thence South 0028'21" Ba.t, a10nCJ the w..t right of way line of the Railroad. a diatance of 1309.09 feet to a polnt on tb. centerline of 1'- w 22nd Avenu., thence North 8S.21'31. W"C, alon, tbe centerline of N. W. 2Znd Aven... a di.~.nce ot "2." !e.t, thence south 0033'53" .a.c, a distance of 130...' f.et, tbenae 80uth 880.5'31. .a.t, a dl.tanee of 333.51 fe.t to a point on tbe Welt right 01 waf 01 the .eaboard co..tllne .al1ro... th..c. with I b'~l'iD9 of loutb 1'-01'23" w..t, a10DI tbe Ne.t rttht 01 way of the railroad, a d18tanaa of 1312.t' I.et, the.a. louth 0.33'!3" BaaC, . diatana. 01 ZI..' feet, thine. loath 13-11'12- W..t, a dietaace 0. "fir ~1 e.." thenae tlol'cll ".'0' 0.. We.t, . dtstanee of 111.10 f..c, tbena. with a b.arla, Hortb 0.."21- W..t, a dlat..nc:e of 200.00 f.et, thence Nortb .'.50'0." We.t, a distance of 211.00 feet; thenc. South 0-."21- la.t a di.tance of 200 00 feet: thence North 88.50'0'" W..t, a d1~tance of 40.00 feet; th.nce South 004"21" Ba.t, a di.~ance of 556 84 feet. then~' ~~~th 88050'04" w..t, a distance of 3611.21 fe.t to a pOlnt c centerline of the above de.eribed centerline of the E-4 o:n_l; thene. with a b..rin, of Horth S.1I'14" w..c, a diltanee of ~::.lJ fe.t, thence with a curv. to the ri,ht havlnQ a radius .00 feet, . central angle of 15031".", and an arc ien9th 'I I, IILIGAL DlaCRIPTIOM . Continued I I!of lZ2.12 feet; thenae North 10018'30. I.ee, a diec.nce J9....a f..~ to . point of curve, thenaa witb . curva co the I, I h..,ia9 a C'.diu. 0' .~IO.OO 'eet, . a.atC'sl ....1. o' 1'-ZO'04 '.nd aa a~. lenvCb of It3." f..t, th.na. wiCb . b..rin. of HOI 800S' 30. w..c, . di.t:anoe O. 11.. .1. ...c t:o . poille on t ;Icenterline 0' N.N. 22nd Avenue, thanee witb a bearin9 ot SOt 189004'32" We.t, alon, tbe cantarline o' M.W. 22nd Avenu. idi.taac. of IS7.'S '.eC .01'. 01' 1... to tbe 'oint of ..,1nnim Contaln1ng "1.'5 aor.. .or. or 1... aad .ubjec:t to ......n and rigbt. of Na, of recard. \1 .. \, . --------.---- t: '10( H- I e,n- b --~ .., \1 ,1- 'I) l 'I. I III f J 'I II ===~_I,. .._, Ii, I, --, '1 1 1-, 1---. f I I I I " /I I I' ~, Ii :1;:: ", iN' -:,.. _A. ::"--, .~:F='''~::'':''1 f '4'11;- ~~ .. ..... t ,. A -, "-- -.---. 1-~:~1'='~~ 1_- ,- ~:> -.- ... . tr '~l I .. . .., \ \ --~~:-- I \ ~~f~ if~---?~~~~ / Jj '_~o / 1 J: ",,',' 0_\' _ 0.1 I lei _ u 1\, . --.--....-... .. . .. - .... ....... . ........ - .. .......... .... .,..,.. , .......,..........-.. ~ .... IC' r-aw .. ~_-=:..-r: ;r.1'~....~_.._- ~ _.. niilii'""' .... II"........... ..... :.r.~;".1;1-... .. :UlIIwrL..n:=:--=c':=&."I ..- t _ -. __......... _ _ tIJII.. MASTE!t PLAN AWtHDUEHT NO. . MAItCH ....17 =r\ot.....~':nU ~..:r..= -:= ~'1r · =====,,:r...-,:.':.:r'.:r.:::-..:- MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGEND - ~. ~ .--. j KEY PLAN __ II--' c.. ceo .. _... IUJ ..... ..,. ......... eo It ..... e .. I c..... 1.I,1l "'. , 10."...... ~ ...... II .. _ II ......,...,..... ..at ..... lIe.....~ au..... - I.. .... ... - ..... ., eo ...... - ...U _.. QU,,"T"" ASSOCIATES Notional CU, Cente, "5 W..I W..hlngton 51. In......... IN ..no.. (317) 'H-IICIO c.lH ..oa ==r- ,- ,...- - HI7 _.. '- Requested City Commission 'feeling Dales o \fa~ 6. 1997 Date Final Form Must be Turned in 10 CilV Manager s Office -\pril_5 1997 (noon) Cv+ ~ 5' ~ Pi ~.~7:z4"'-. f-1 "'^- of 91 ~~ rV{-f. wk- ~ CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH (,2~../k C DO's- AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FO~ ~ ~ ~ ~ io^t~ltl~ V 1-f7ift:;:; ~ ~ ~ Date Final Form Mi!ie T~fo ~ 10 .to CllV Mana2er s Office ..erl June 20. 1997 (noon) ~f . ~l'U~ Julv 3 1997 (Thursday noon) ~ Requested City Commission Meeling Dates o Jul~ \ 1997 ~ \fay 20 1997 May 9 1997 (noon) o July I' 1997 o June 3 1997 \fay 23 1997 (noon) 0 -\ugust 5 1997 yt, July 25 1997 (noOlH i.~~:J ~ ~a..~-+,-, wi,.-ttv 6fJ5o/f o ,," 17 1997 ,,,,6 19971'OO"~ t:i~~;:::~ RECOMMENDA TION Please place /tlr:~uest below on the May 20 1997 City CommIssion meeting under Public Hearing. The Planning and Development Board, with a 6-1 vote, recommends approval of the Quantum Park DR! amendment and master plan modification, subject to all staff comments In Exhibit 'F" Conditions of Approval with the exception of comments 7 8, 9 10, II 12, 13 17 and 19 and revisions to comments I and 16 relative to incomplete utIlity system analysis and deleting commercial use on various lots. ~'1-f~~&c~-h~. Regarding combent 8 (lack ofmamtenance of the sand pine preserve and other landscape areas), staff agrees to delete thIS comment and will refer this lack of compliance to Code Enforcement. Regarding comments 9-13 (traffic), staff has received the attached rebuttal from the i;D.. arek holding fas' '0 comments 9-13 therefore staff recommend. that they not be deleted. Regarding comments 6 and mmercial use option on additional lots), staff strongly maintains that no additional commercial lots be . garding comment 19, staff agrees to delete this comment and add it as a condition of future site plan approval for industrial lots along Gateway Lastly an ordinance is scheduled for fIrSt reading at the May 20m City Commission meeting as well, which is necessary to amend the Quantum Park DR! development order The recommended conditions of approval are inserted in the ordinance and are recommended for approval. For further details pertaining to this request, see attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 97-213 EXPLANATION Project: Quantum Park PID Agent: James G, Willard and Bowen LLP O~U' QuanmmA~Wa Location West side of the intersection of Interstate 95 and Gateway Boulevard DESCRIPTION. Request to amend the previously approved PID master plan in connection with an amendment to the DRl as follows: Change in traffic.. - b due to possible future severing of Quantum Boulevard between lots 22 and 31 and lots 6 through 1 J, and c......dIe master plan designation of lots 6, 7 8, 9, 10, 11, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 30, 31, 2, 3 15 16 and 40A from office to office/industrial use; of lots I 66, 67 A and 67C from officelhotel use to office/industrial! commercial use; oflots 12. 13 and 14 from office/research and development to office use; lots 32, 33 34A, 348, 35, 36, 37 and 38 from office/industrial to industrial use; of lots 17, 18, 19, 21, 39, 52, 81, 82, 83, 84 and 85 fh..'m office to office/industriaJI commercial use; of lot 40 from office/government and institutional to government and institutional use; change in the master plan designation of lots 58, 59, 60, 6land 62 from industriaJIresearch and development to office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 86, 87, 88, 89A, 89B and 90B from research and development to office/industrial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 65A, 65B. 678 and 91 from officelhotellcommercial to office/industriaJIcommercial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 from office/commercial to office/industria1l commercial use; change in the master plan designation of lot 90A from research and development to government and institutional use; change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 68B from research and development to office/industriaJI commercial use; change in the master plan designation of lots 56, 57, 69, 70, 72, 73A, S'\BULLETlN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC . fly o..'iNrO't,- ~i\ III -. ,j'.~~ 7~~-.i Ib ~/~~" .. ~.. / / ... CITY OF BOYNTON ~ACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM ,... 73B 7-t and 7; from mdustnal to officeiindustnaVcommerclal use change in the master plan designation of lots 46A, 48A. 488. -t8C ;OA, 50B, ; I 8 and 510 from industrial to office, industrial use change m the master plan deSignation of lots 76 "17 78 and 79 from mdustrlaVcommercial to commercial use' and change m the master plan deSignation of lot 80 from office to commercial use PROGRAM IMPACT "'liA FISCAL IMPACT "'l/A AL TERNA TIVES: N/A ~ --/~~t ~ Department Head' . ~ ~ 4lJ-'-v ~ ;' ity Manager's Signature Department Name Page 2 of2 S:\8ULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUMNO 97-213 TO' Chamnan and Members Planmng and Development Board FROM. .1 Tambn J Heyden, AICP Il<J.L-- Plannmg and Zomng DIrector DATE. May 8, 1997 SUBJECT Quantum Park - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001 Master Plan Amendment No 8 (combme land uses, add optIOnal uses to lots, sever Quantum Boulevard) NATURE OF REQUEST Quantum Park of Commerce, a partIally bmlt-out Development of RegIOnal Impact (DRI) compnsed of 539 9 acres, zoned PID (Planned Industnal Development), IS located on the west sIde ofI-95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton (C-16) Canal (see attached locatIOn map - Exhibit "A") James G Willard, Esqmre and agent for Quantum ASSOCIates, property owner of the Quantum Park of Commerce, has requested an amendment to theIr DRI development order, Ordmance No 84-51 as amended by Ordmance No 86-11, 86-37, 88-3, 94- 10,94-51,96-33 and 96-65 The proposed amendments whIch reVIse the master plan (master SIte development plan) are as follows 1) Change in traffic distribution due to possible future severing of Quantum 80ulevard between lots 22 and 31 and lots 6 through 11 2) Change in the master plan designation of lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 2, 3 15, 16 and 40A from office to office/industrial use, 3) Change in the master plan designation of lots 1, 66, 67 A and 67C from office/hotel use to office/industrial/commercial use, 4) Change in the master plan designation of lots 12, 13 and 14 from office/research and development to office use, 5) Change in the master plan designation of lots 32, 33, 34A, 348, 35, 36, 37 and 38 from office/industrial to industrial use, 6) Change in the master plan designation of lots 17,18,19,21,39, 52,83,84 and 85 from office to office/industrial/commercial use, 7) Change in the master plan designation of lot 40 from office/government and institutional to government and institutional use, 8) Change in the master plan designation of lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62 from industrial/research and development to office/industrial use, 9) Change in the master plan designation of lots 86, 87, 88, 89A, 89B and 90B from research and development to office/industrial use, 10) Change in the master plan designation of lots 65A, 658, 678 and 91 from office/hotel/commercial to office/industrial/commercial use, 11) Change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 from office/commercial to officelindustrial/commercial use, 12) Change in the master plan designation of lot 90A from research and development to government and institutional use, I Page 2 Memorandum No 97-213 Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001 13) Change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 688 from research and development to office/industrial/commercial use, 14) Change in the master plan designation of lots 56, 57, 69, 70, 72, 73A, 738, 74 and 75 from industrial to office/industrial/commercial use, 15) Change in the master plan designation of lots 46A, 48A, 488, 48C, 50A, 508, 518 and 51 D from industrial to office/industrial use, 16) Change in the master plan designation of lots 76, 77, 78 and 79 from industrial/commercial to commercial use, 17) Change in the master plan designation of lot 80 from industrial/commercial to commercial use, and 18) Change m the master plan desIgnatIOn of lots 81 and 82 from industnal/commercIal to office/industnal/commercIal use. BACKGROUND The amendment request IS governed by SectIOn 7 of AppendIx A, Zomng, CIty of Boynton Beach Code of Ordmances, whIch estabhshes Planned Industnal Development DIStrIctS and by Chapter 38006 (19) (e) (2), Flonda Statutes, Developments of RegIOnal Impact - SubstantIal DeViatIOns. ThIS amendment IS submItted m connectIOn wIth a request from the apphcant that: 1) the CIty make a determination that the master plan amendment IS not substantial m nature and 2) the proposed change to the Quantum Park DRI development order a) IS not a substantIal deViatIOn and b) does not reqUIre further Development of RegIOnal Impact reVIew A pubhc hearmg must be conducted by the CIty CommIssIOn pnor to makmg a determmatIOn as to whether the proposed change IS substantial m nature and whether further development of regIOnal Impact reVIew IS reqUIred. If no further reVIew IS reqUIred, the CIty CommISSIon shall Issue an amended development order which, m this mstance, reqUIres the passage of an ordmance WhICh amends the ongmal development order If a determmatIOn IS made that the proposed change reqUIres further development of regIOnal Impact reVIew, the reVIew shall be conducted only on those aspects of the development order reqUIred to be changed. The reqUIred pubhc hearmg shall receIve a fifteen (15) day pubhc notIce, followmg the passage of thIrty (30) days, but not more than forty-five (45) days after receIpt of the amendment matenals, The CIty CommIssIOn wIll conduct ItS hearmg on May 20, 1997, as advertIsed, and If the CIty CommISSIon determmes the proposed changes to be non-substantial, wIth no further reVIew reqUIred, first readmg of the amended Quantum Park development order (an ordmance) Will occur on May 20, 1997 as well. On December 17, 1996, the City CommISSIOn approved an amendment to the Quantum Park master plan m connectIOn \vIth the seventh amendment to the Quantum Park DRI development order At thIS time, the CommISSIOn agreed to retam note 4 on the master plan m exchange for Quantum Park preparmg a revIsed master plan havmg a "use trading matnx", pnor to any future change to a lot desIgnated commercIal on the Quantum Park master plan. Note 4 reads, "Lots ~ Page 3 Memorandum No 97-213 Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001 WIthm the project may be changed/relocated by approval of the CIty CormmssIOn wIthout further DRI reVIew or amendment." The subject request has been submitted to address the ComlmssIOn's December 17, 1996 dIrectIOn to the applIcant whIch IS necessary now to allow approval of a restaurant (commercIal) on the recently approved Hampton Inn parcel (lot 1). ANAL YSIS ExhibIt B contams the proposed master SIte development plan. Added to each lot Impacted by thIS request are the current approved land use designations for ease of companson wIthm thIS exhibIt. The chart below summarIzes the number of lots Impacted by thIS request. FROM TO NUMBER OF LOTS LOT NUMBERS Office Office Industrial 21 6,7,8,910,11,22,23, 24,25,26,27,28,29, 30,31,2,3,15,16,40A OfficelHotel Office Industrial Commercial 4 1,66, 67A, 67C OfficelResearch & Development Office 3 12, 13, 14 Office/Industrial Industrial 8 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36,37,38 Office Office Industrial Commercial 9 17 18,19,21,39,52, 83,84,85 Office/ Government & Institutional Government & Institutional 1 40 IndustriaIlResearch & Development Office Industrial 5 58,59,60,61,62 Research & Development Office Industrial 6 86, 87, 88, 89A, 89B, 90B OfficelHotel/Commercial Office Industrial Commercial 4 65A, 65B, 67B, 91 Office/Commercial Office Industrial Commercial 2 63,64 Research & Development Government & Institutional 1 90A Research & Development Office Industrial Commercial 2 68A, 68B Industrial Office Industrial Commercial 9 56,57,69,70,72, 73A, 73B, 74, 75 Industrial Office Industrial 8 46A, 48A, 48B, 48C, 50A, 50B, 51B, 5ID Industrial/Commercial Commercial 4 76, 77, 78, 79 Industrial/Commercial Commercial 1 80 Industrial/Commercial Office/Industrial/Commercial 2 81,82 As shown in the chart above, the optIOn of mdustnalIs bemg added to a net of 34 lots, the option of commercial IS being added to a net of 24 lots, and the optIOn of office IS bemg added to a net of 21 lots. ExhibIt C graphIcally illustrates the lot locatIOns of the optIOnal land uses of pnmary 3 Page 4 Memorandum No 97-213 Quantum - MPMD 97-001lDRIA 97-001 mterest. In general terms, mdustnalIs being added to the northwest comer of the PID (adjacent to the Dos Lagos PUD), at the northeast comer of Gateway Boulevard and High RIdge Road and on the south sIde of Gateway Boulevard, between Quantum Lakes Dnve and Park Ridge Boulevard. Commercial IS bemg added to the lots along the eastern segment of Park RIdge Boulevard (includmg four lots the back up to 1-95) Both commerCIal and mdustrial are being added along Gateway Boulevard. The effect of thIS, If approved, would be to allow commercial uses along the entire stretch of Gateway Boulevard (excludmg three BGI lots) and abuttmg 1-95 With any redIstributIOn or redesIgnatIOn of land use WItlnn the master plan, the followmg local issues are evaluated. 1 Does the redIstributIOnlredesIgnatIOn of land use result m a change m concept for the Quantum Park of Commerce or the abIlIty of the Park to develop m a quahty manner? 2. What Impact Will the land use redistributIOnlredesIgnatIOn have on projected expendItures whIch wIll be spent wIthm the regIOn? 3 Does the Impact of the land use redIstributIOnlredesIgnatIOn result m a conflIct With the number, type and payroll level of Jobs projected m Quantum Park's ApplIcatIOn for Development Approval (ADA)? 4 What Impact WIll the land use redIstributIOnlredesIgnatIOn have on adjacent property? 5 Will there be an mcrease m traffic resulting from the land use redIstributionlredesIgnatIOn? Regardmg Issue one above, last summer, the apphcant submItted a master plan amendment/DRI amendment to allow, among other thmgs, the option of commerCial on all 1-95 abuttmg lots, most of the west SIde of the eastern segment of Park Ridge Boulevard, as well as along the Gateway Boulevard corndor east of Quantum Lakes Dnve As a condItion of approval, the applicant was reqUIred by the CommIssion to not only lImIt the total acres of commerCial, but deSIgnate the exact locatIOn of those 47 acres. ThIS was m response to the follOWing concerns whIch CIty staff belIeve apply to the subject request as well a. The "optIOn" of commercIal on such a large number of lots defeats the purpose of master plannmg and wIll lead to spotty locatmg of commercial uses WIth no conSIderatIOn of adjacent uses. b CommerCial uses, whIch draw customers, pedestnans and vehIcles, haphazardly mIxed WIth mdustrIal uses, whIch reqUIre greater tractor trailer traffic, IS potentially unsafe and IS not recommended by transportatIOn planners. c. Addmg the optIOn of commerCIal use on lots along Gateway Boulevard and High RIdge Road and along the railroad tracks and 1-95 will Impact the type of commercIal ventures 10terested m 10cat1Og 10 Quantum Park. Tlns slnft will attract commerCial uses such as servIce statIOns, fast food restaurants, oil change garages, and stnp commerCial that will be 10terested In the 1-95 vIsibihty and captunng external project traffic, With lIttle relatIOn to the planned 10dustnal park. d. In the VICIruty of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road, west of Congress Avenue alone, there IS already 500,000 square feet of commerCial square if Page 5 Memorandum No 97-213 Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001 footage approved, unbmlt and vested smce 1990 These approvals, as well as the ViSIOns 20/20 commercIal reVItalIzatIOn efforts planned for Federal Highway, Will be competmg With the pnme vIsibihty, hIgh traffic commercIal lots proposed m Quantum Park, due to the type of commercial uses that will now be mterested m locatmg m Quantum Park. Smce the demand for commercIal land use IS firute, ~ some eXIstmg commercIal uses WIthm the CIty may mIgrate to Quantum Park. e. Stnp commercIal and the types of commercial uses that will be mterested m locatmg close to the 1-95 mterchange will lead to re-subdIvIsIon of the maJonty of the proposed commercIal parcels along Gateway Boulevard mto smaller parcels and the creatIOn of outbuildmgs, whIch will mcrease the appearance of more commercIal use m the PID ThIs IS because, although the land area would not mcrease, more commercIal bmldmgs would result smce the types of commercIal referenced reqUIre smaller parcels than IS currently platted along Gateway Boulevard. Also, there ' would be the potentIal for stackmg of buildmgs and sIgnage; all competmg for VIsibilIty and access to remam Viable; factors less Important for office and manufactunng uses. f. As stated m the zorung code, "The purpose of the PID dIStnCt is to proVIde a zoning clasSIficatIon for lIght mdustnal development that will better satISfy current demands for lIght mdustnal zoned lands by encouragmg development whIch will reflect changes m the technology of land development and relate the development of land to the speCIfic SIte and to conserve natural amerutIes." The mcreased optIOn of commerCial space causes a shIft m the Image of the PID, espeCially as VIewed from the 1-95 mterchange; one of the major gateways to the CIty This ShIft has no connectIOn to any change m mdustnal technology and the demand for mdustnal land. Rather than creatmg unIque opporturutIes for development not proVIded ... elsewhere m the CIty, the ShIft competes With other areas of the CIty g. It has been argued by the applIcant that the CIty can control undeSIrable commercial uses through the use approval process. The use approval process IS the method deVIsed for a PID to establIsh uses permItted for a speCIfic PID dIStnCt, rather than establIsh m the zonmg code a ngId lIst of permItted uses. ThIs method was deVIsed for flexibilIty and to keep up With technology as new uses are created m the marketplace. However, to allow blanket approval of commerCial, WIthOUt consIdenng 10catIOnalImpacts, defeats the purpose of master planrung and weakens · the CIty'S abIlIty to deny a speCIfic commercIal use at the time of use approval If a parcel has already been deSIgnated for commercial use. h. The proposed commerCIal optIOn of all the lots south of Gateway Boulevard that back up to the raIlroad tracks and 1-95 will encourage further COnflICtS With the PID penpheral greenbelt reqUIred to be mstalled along the railroad tracks and the 4 approved Quantum Park SIgn program. ThIs IS due to the deSIre of these uses, more so than other uses, to have unobstructed VIsibIlIty of buildmgs, sIgnage and extenor storage and dIsplay areas from 1-95, examples of whIch can be seen WIthm other CItIes along 1-95 ThIS was the reason that the maJonty of the commercial lots are located mternally to the park on the approved master plan. 1. Over the past two years, there has been mcreasmg mterest m locatmg manufactunng uses WIthm Quantum Park. In recogrutIOn of the CIty'S need to attract research and development and lIght mdustnal uses to dIverSIfy ItS economIC base, the CIty aggreSSIvely pursued BGl to locate m Quantum Park. The CIty also Identified economIC development as one of ItS vlSlorung goals. Towards that end an economIC 5" Page 6 Memorandum No 97-213 Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001 aggressIvely pursued BGI to locate In Quantum Park. The CIty also IdentIfied economIC development as one of ItS visiomng goals. Towards that end an econormc ..- - development dIrector was hIred last September and an economic Incentive program for Quantum Park was adopted applIcable to developments bnngIng In a certain number of jobs. The jobs however, also needed to pay a certaIn rmnimum salary e Also, as one of the CIty'S recently adopted "qUIck VICtOry" vlSlomng projects, a formal marketIng program will be developed WIthIn 90 days to further promote ; Quantum Park as an Industnal park. As a pOInt of Interest, Boca Raton IS currently processIng a DRI for the vacant IBM bUIldIng and 500 acres In the vlclmty for a 5 millIon square foot lIght Industnal . park! TIns actIOn sIgnals further competItIOn, and also IndIcates a strong market at tIns tIme for lIght Industnal uses. ) RegardIng Issue two above, It IS antIcIpated that the proposed master plan ch;mges will have no .~ effect on the prOjected expendItures whIch will be spent WIthIn the regIOn. RegardIng Issue three above, It IS belIeved that the proposed master plan changes will have an effect on the number, type _ and payroll level of jobs projected In Quantum Park's ongInal applIcatIOn for Development Approval (ADA) TIns IS because allOWIng the optIon of commerCIal on lots WIth lugh VIsibilIty, and lugh pass-by traffic WIll encourage development of these lots as commerCIal over industnal. The pay range for servIce sector jobs IS smaller and Industnal acreage proVIdes a greater number of jobs than commerCIal acreage. Jobs salanes are, In turn, lInked to home pnces. AttractIng hIgher .. ~ed reSIdentIal developments was also a ViSIOns 20/20 ObjectIve. Regarding Issue 4 (impact on adjacent property), there IS a concern WIth locating Industnal uses adjacent to the Dos Lagos PUD ThIs IS based on the expenence the CIty has had WIth complaInts from the reSIdents south of Quantum Park regardIng truck, radIO and VOIce nOIse and early hours of operatIOn of the Industnal uses along the south border of the Park and as far away as the PublIx DIstributIon Center The buffenng proposed wIll only proVIde VISual, and not audItory, mItIgatIOn due to the Inherent IncompatibIlIty of these uses. RegardIng Issue 5 (traffic), the CIty does not have a traffic engIneer or traffic planner on board and does not budget for outSIde reVIew of submItted traffic studIes, therefore the CIty must rely on the .. regIOnal plannmg COunCIl'S (RPC) reVIew of Quantum Park's traffic study ExhibIt "D" contaIns the RPC's comments on the study It also contaInS FDOT's traffic comments (on state roads only) and the project traffic engIneer's response to the RPC's comments. The RPC, nor Palm Beach County, had suffiCIent tIme to reVIew the traffic engIneer's response pnor to the wntIng of tIns report. Therefore, traffic concerns WIll have to be resolved pnor to CommISSIOn approval of tIns request. As a pOInt of InfOrmatIOn, staff has also asked the RPC to make a recommendatIOn regardIng the tImIng of the wldemng of Gateway Boulevard. The development order IndIcates that tIns was to be done by the end of 1994 SInce build out of the project has occurred more slowly than expected, thIs tImeframe needs to be adjusted accordmgly In addItIon to the redeslgnatIOn of lots for greater flexibilIty, Quantum Park Boulevard IS proposed to be severed. ThIs would allow consolIdatIOn of lots In thIS area for development by one Industnal user Although thIS WIll reqUIre a future abandonment applIcatIOn to be processed, It was Included at thIS tIme because It IS a regIOnal Issue and potentIally Impacts the DRI's road system due to redIstributIOn of tnps. Staff concerns from EngIneering, RecreatIOn and Parks, UtilItIes and Fire Departments regardIng thIS sevenng are Included In ExhibIt "F" - ConditIOns of Approval. r; Page 7 Memorandum No 97-213 Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001 RECOMMENDATION To address the conflIcts staff has raIsed WIth tlns request's Impact on the CIty'S objectIve of actIvely promotmg Quantum Park as an mdustnal park, staff recommends the land use desIgnatIOn changes Illustrated on ExhibIt "E" These changes mclude the follOWIng: 1 deletIOn of mdustnal on lots 3, 22-31 and 6-11 , 2. addItIon ofmdustnal on lots 12-14, 3 deletIOn of commercial on lots 17-19,21,39,52,56,57, 72, 70, 69, 73A, 73B, 74, 75, 81, 82, 83-85, 68A and 68B, 4 deletIOn of commercial, but retammg hotel use on lots 66, 67 A and 67C, 5 addItIon of office to lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 Pursuant to Flonda Statutes, Chapter 38006(19) SubstantIal DeViatIOns, the submItted amendment IS conSIdered to be an (e)(3) type change (a change not speCIfically claSSIfied elsewhere under state law) Under (e)(3) changes, the apphcant must prOVIde "clear and convmcmg eVIdence" supportmg that hIS requested changes do not constItute a substantIal deVIatIOn. The only aspect of thIS request that mIght possibly constItute a substantIal deViatIOn IS the redIstributIOn of traffic caused by the large flexibIhty of land use allocatIOn m the project. Therefore, staff recommends approval of thIS request, subject to staff comments m ExhibIt "F" - CondItIons of Approval, whIch must be addressed pnor to adoptIOn of the ordmance amendmg the development order Staff further recommends that the commISSIOn determme that tills applicatIOn does not constItute a substantIal master plan change pursuant to local codes and does not constItute a substantIal deViatIOn under state law TJH.dIm Attachments xc Apphcant Central FIle S:\P1anning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\MPMD\staffreport.doc 7 EXHIBIT "A" 6 L0~ATION MAt) QUANTUM CORPORATE PAR~ ~f!j1 ( lTli'li- ---",'1." ~ 'tJ. '\ /. : ~ l/~ 1'\11 .,. I ' ~ '" f~ '. '. . .1-- f /-1 -r, ~.. 'S'~' ::.:" ,.':.. '\ ~,\,' \,.. r~ ~___ I...U' r-II \~ , 'r .., : \ " . _ _ ~I '''''''''''''' UUl-tlli:-:~'''~'''''''~~_ .~~\\./ '-,,' '-':l r 't;. l::ll HI/III>' '" ,} \' .~\, ~';'-_:'.'.': .., \ .~... I: ~ ~ ;;:rr · I-'.:;"~t;.t '~, '\ '!\r ~.,) # "" S-r4'T .....,rj l-J ",,~;y, :--..J 11111 "I::t:. ~. · , ~ At IRri I. ~~...... "I/> '. / 0<'-----.-'" 'j . lJIlJJ ,t' H, ~/ :~ I; , "~"J 4. Ai j ''''''.l:i'''-' I.~ :_ _ ..... .~. ~ ~I, ~ ' rm;= ~ " II::; (' ~ I r= 111 "'1':. ..-----1/21; jl/ j '. I :' "" If":,,,. "~' iff ",,, "", .: ............. .~_ ~. ~ r:; I .' CtJ/ I ~ , 1\101- , ; ',:,..'J."\"';;"W.;ifi;;*,}',!:.,,\~~ ':!"'L~\W;.;;",;;:,..,.., . JY!' - u ~ ;:::- ~ ...'...""".....".......".......".,.w.,... ............,...,."......." .. C, 1'" Y ~ ""J [ -::.- " .~ / /4fJ!~'.~[.~~W<<~f;ailit~!~tfjl;.;? !!!" . 'r;': ~ Ii f?lll ~ '" ~ ~,' ~ fil, ,id~~t~ft.\~ff4Hi~t~~iifflf ~ __!.: ~:f-J t:7", ~ ' .W r 1'r::t .,,". " .... ,. "''''(ffi~f'''''' ~ __', I "-L... 4 J ~. ': t2' $~!~~l;:{j~ it. ,e"~lg[!,,; l;';:r'5i.~'.,;",,,, , ".,,!~ '.f ~ l!1 ~ FI ..,.,....,.." 'w"...,.,..... .... "".~ i"".' ."...._"~~:......,.,'yi".....,...'v'''e''''. j I ::- (""liT'" ~i~'f~j. .., ~E~tl%. , ..... ....., . "'" ............ '.. .~' [) ~ ~'.- . ;~;..._~"~~~-~.~~, r" - -~) : "';i",,,,. .,.., ., ','..i; ;J,..:StlJfA'" ''''''''''"''"ii~.,.. ..,..... ":'i' 'tiffJ:" iii;;',""', ,,"',,!!!ff!,.,.. .,.It':.: ::::-;':~;;~:i::i:!)::".:~.:f.j I ,I / ./ I.' , ';"\""'1; 'Y"~~:.. .-::, ;.::';..... ". . A~4t "",,: ;;,.::;~, 'i':':j:~!,iili,.../\;: ...\'tlf}.{!'t':l'\;\;'I:!'i" I if i ; " ;" '..;,;" ;ii, ',.'. ....,...... '......". .... .,...... ..,.. ." ,.."". ,..,,; ...,....,..""" ....... e '"ijj''' .... ...."..,.",... ~ , ~...... .,...... '.. .... ."..";;.....,,. ......... ''';C'' ............ ..,.,';'-" i;" ......e "... ...., .....e... . '... . ' '1 TI/ _ ~\ b:::/= >-"'1~" -' '. -~ ~ Ii:::: / i--' .':. 1/8 MILESV '-Jf " Cor: '" '" , :: r:::: =~ ~ ;:" , I , ' , I '':'')-J' '/ J ~>Co_ '~'- ~..:. r=::-~ ~ _ f j / ~;::I~~_ ,- '-:::: r=::-- ~- ,.. " ili tJ_(~". --= . '-.. r- : '~"." :> 800 FEE;T - -... ,;. ~ ,- _ 'J , fJ!I11''1!IlIWII" , "'. -..-----: 3.:.~:z,;~1 ':;:i ~~!!tli '- "ern_ j ~ I EXHIBIT "B" (0 EXHIBIT "c" /d, PROPOSED AMENDMENT EXHIBIT .C. n":,~'- 'I 1-- 11.- if" l '1, , III f J 'I Ii .=--==,:,:..:.:.::',!":o:; ~~"'" '__ 1'1 ,. I II :1 -, -, 1 1 !- 1. 1--, j'1 ( III ':, iiT - .=-- -. ~ ~-:.-s.:~~~:?'~:"::" ....- t ..."... ~..... t.-g - t!.a.t ::- - --, r'~~-:;;~-L~ ,1- f-:\:> ._..~ '!.. .' I " 1/ ;;. il- ,1 '1 II ,l " '.&1 LOTS ADDING COMMERCIAt--- 1: ! (' I i I,'! . - ~I ,. !ft. .JM. I :. 'jll .Iff) ...... . :: . ~~. 1~/ ~~--- u....._...~--- - ~'F ----v-----.r~_ , i :/;"" i ,." LOTS ADDING INDUSTRIAL , , , , LOTS ADDING BOTH / , COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAl. co;" , , , -' '----- l(' i\ ..... MASTER PLAN AMENOMENT NO. 8 MARCH 8. t 117 .....llOlIIIDNfl/I,..lIIbCIlL1D ....___Afftll. ... or ttC .... WICXll ~ . ICCffIIWoCI ...... (llII ....1rC*l.., NO . QlIt:O ./1"'. J ==~. M ~M'!1~-::' ::'crm be tcIIIl . CUll) t,.,- 10 .,. CItOtS ws.ar MIA. ~ i:'~..:=-..:. 14# ___ ..... MIl "lJNmU .. .. NlIU\. ..... (DMII(IIIOIl Il(SOIA....' J ...... CJID> ..... ,. .. ......, ....... __ .un 1M. =~ ~\,~.:. ~~:.::~. == ~= =n:u'1. ~ttl."II(I'" , :::: ~ :"J~,J:"=".=r~' ::.!' WCA1II MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGEND .. b. ~ ----- - ..fllrt T KEY PLAN &- CommItI.., 0...._..1 COWIl (C...........IaI) 13.53 Ac,.. INO (lndu.lrlal) 'o.n Acr.. C .. I (Co_IaljlMlltullonal) 50.n Ac,.. OFF (Olflc.) 11.44 Acr.. a (o,nc./IndII.I,IaI) 100.25 Ac:,.. ac (Oll",./ln_lrIaI/tommwclal) lOll. 53 Ao.. Wetlondl 1.00 Io.cr.. Sond P~. H..... 4~.OO Acr.. Road. ~,.U Acr.. QUANTUM ASSOCIATES Notional City Center 115 West Washington st Indianapolis. IN 46204 (317) 636-1600 OPEN SPACE::::::r- Park. ,.....~ '0.1' Acr.. Note Lots with handwritten land use designations noted on them are lots impacted by this amendment. The handwritten land use is the current approved land use. The typed land use designation, on those lots with no handwritten land use designation, is the current approved land use. /3 EXHIBIT "0" Ii- MAV-08-1997 14 36 ~' " t'" I~l' i.;;: ~;" -.:;. ~<": ~. . ....:: t~. ~,~, ,'::;" ...~_. ;;f ~-~" ."'~' i';;: ~ ~.' 1::~; .,. t.c. 109-':': "I'~:. i~~-~ r "1:" TeRPe (reO/urea COQ(t I reglona Plonninng counc 5612214067 P 01/02 ~ '\. j 1 i 'UUj MAY - 8 PLANNING ANi) ZONING DEPT. Apnl 16, 1997 Ms. Tambn Heyden. Director Planning and Zoning Department City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Subject: Quantum Park Development of Regional Impact ReView of Proposed Change Dear Ms. Heyden. In accordance with the reqUlrements of SectIon 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, we have reVIewed the "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI)" (NOPC) for Quantum Park DR! dated March 17, 19q7 submitted to Council by James G. Willard on March 17, 1997 The NOpe proposes to revise the master plan to slmplifv the land use designations on lots WIthin the DR! reducing the number of categories of approved uses, place multiple uses on the unsold lots to prOVide more flexibility for better marketing, provlde for the potential redevelopment of lots 22 through 31 and 6 through 11 m conjunction with the abandonment of Quatum Boulevard contiguous to these lots, and revise the development order as It relates to traffic momtoring The applicant believes the changes meets the cntena of SectiOn 380.06(l9)(e)2.. Florida Stat1!ltes (F S ) Council does not agree and believes the change is presumed to be a subs.tantial deviationpursuiiiflo-S-cclion-"380,06(19)(e)3., F S The appl~cant has prOVIded a traffle analysis to rebut the presumption information to show that the changes will not create any ~ditlonal regional impacts which would require substantial deviation review Cou~cil has reVIewed the traffic stud) provided by the applIcant to rebut the presumptIon and i has the following conunents/concems 312. s.w. martin downs blvd. suit. 205 . p,o M" 1529 palm ctty, florlClO Mf'IO phe... (5611221-4060 Ie 269.CCJ60 fax 11611221-4067 (5 '07 , ' ~ ~ ) . ~ d I 11 f o l ~AY-08-1997 14 37 TCRPC 5512214067 P 02/02 .- Ms. Tambri Heyden April 16, 1997 Page 2 1) The previous traffic study done for the Quantum Park DRl assumes a. total of 1,430,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA) of office development. However the Master Plan includes 1,687,772 GFA for office development. Traffic impacts due to the additional office deveLopment has not been addressed in the traffic study The Increase In office would create unrevlewed traffic impact, Therefore, the master plan should be revised to include 1,430 000 GF A of office development to be consistent With the traffic study 2) The project is currently allows the tradeoff of square footage of conun~rciaI development for hotel rooms (268 SF/room) The origmal plan proposed two 2~room hotels for a muimum of 400 rooms. The master plan should be revised to mc:lude a maximum of 400 hotel rooms 3) The proposed master plan indicates the project IS vested for 63,752 average dally tnps. If the trip generation potentIal of the project is to contInue [0 be included in the master plan the pm peak hour trip generatlon should also be mcluded 4) There IS an eXisting development order condition which requires mOJilitoring of trips for every commercIal sIte approved along Park RIdge Road. The monitormg is requued to Identtfy intersection improvements at Gateway Boulevard and Park RIdge Road. However project traffic whIch was antlclpared along Park RIdge Road may occur somewhere else in [he project based on the proposed changes to the master plan. GIven the proposed large flexibility of land use allocation within the project, a new condiuon should be mcluded in the development order [0 perform annual mOnItormg at the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Park Ridge Road. ThIS conditIon should deternune what and when improvements are needed to mamtain the facility at the adopted level of service. Please call If you have any questions. Sincerely. L!J J James T Snyder Ex.ecutive Director I I I Mm/jts cc Peter D Spyke. TCRPC Actmg ChaIrman I mreg Stuart, FDCA ~ames G Willard, Applicant I TOTAL F 02 1& ~=n -~~.'I,J. n il/1 R .00 ' It '-~ U I!J ~ n --'"-!gq~ ! I ~ Hi'] -~:J if"' ~,iD I .~' ;:011- ._,.,....~.~~.~.;.~.....-~ ':.; ",,'. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Engineering Planning and Environmental Consultants May 2, 1997 Ms. Tambri Heyden, Director Planning and Zoning Department City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard PO Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Dear Ms. Heyden We have reviewed the letter from James Snyder of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council dated April 16, 1997 regarding the Quantum Park NOPC. The following responds to the four review comments provided in the subject letter 1) The land use maximums specified on the plan are not being changed as a part of this NOPC. The current plan allows 1,685,772 square feet of office space. However, for clarity we have provided the following background information Table 2D reflects the land use consistent with the ADA. It includes 4 43 million square feet of industrial, 426,888 square feet of commercial, and 1 68 million square feet of office. It also includes 400 hotel rooms. The total trips were 67,154 During the review process, it was determined that the hotel use should be treated as commercial with a trade-off of square footage of 268 square feet of commercial per hotel room Therefore the hotel trips are now included in the total commercial trips. This resulted in 63/752 total vested trips (see revised table 20) The traffic analysis undertaken as a part of the study for Amendment No 7 included land use totalling 65/300 daily trips (see attached table) Thus the study actually evaluated a greater impact than can now occur based on land use maximums. The attached table shows that the total square footage for the combination of Industrial and R & D was 3 772 million square feet. . TEL 407 898 1511 FAX 407 894 4791 /7 . Suite 200 The Carr Building 3113 Lawlon Road Orlando, Florida 32803 ~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Ms. Tambri Heyden, May 2, 1997 Page 2 However, the final approval of amendment No.7 limited industrial, including R&D, to 2,784,354 square feet. Thus industrial use was decreased by 988,144 square feet. At the same time the City limited industrial square footage, it set the limit on office at 1,685 772 square feet. The amendment No 7 study had actually used 1,416, 625 square feet (the 1,430,000 square feet referenced in Mr Snyder's letter is from another table referenced in the study) Thus the approved office is 269,147 square feet more than that contained in the study This is more than offset by the reduced industrial referenced above The effect of these changes represented an increase of 339 PM peak hour office trips and a corresponding decrease of 655 PM peak hour industrial trips. Clearly, there is less impact with the current plan 2) The approved trade-off mechanism to convert hotel to commercial ensures that the project impacts cannot be exceeded In addition, all development proposals for Quantum Park require site plan review and approval by the City for individual land use compatibility Since there is no danger of increased impacts and the City has site plan approval control, there does not seem to be a need to place a maximum on hotel development. The proposed cap may impose an unnecessary NOPC to review what would be no increase in impact. 3) The daily vesting was included at the request of the City due to the fact that the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards monitor traffic on a daily basis. This gives them a value to monitor A peak hour vested threshold is not needed If and when necessary, allowable peak hour trips can always be calculated based on the original ADA land use. 4) The only possible effect of the proposed master plan changes on the subject intersection come from increased commercial development north of Gateway Boulevard. As noted in the Amendment 8 traffic study, this causes a decrease in the commercial development allowable south of the intersection The traffic study demonstrates that with this scenario, the committed improvements still provide the necessary traffic capacity The only possible effect may be that if commercial development were to occur to a significant level north of Gateway Boulevard prior to significant commercial development to the south of Gateway Boulevard, the order of priority for implementing committed improvements at the intersection may possibly change. Therefore a development order condition as follows would be acceptable to the applicant: /8 -- APPROVED TRIP GENERATION-DAILY I I TOTAL I - LAND USE ITE CODE ! UNITS QUANTITY I TRIPS ! I INDUSTRIAL 130 1,000 sq ft. I 4,443,120 * 23,460 I ! ; COMMERCIAL 820 1,000 sq ft. i 426,888 ** 23,266 i I OFFICE i 750 1,000 sq ft. 1,685,772 * 17,026 i i I ! HOTEL I 400 * * * 310 rooms ; TOTAL I 63,752 i TABLE 20 * Limit to rate at end of database: industrial 5 28/1,000 office 10 10/1,000 * * Multiple parcels: some may be aggregated, some may not; use 200,000 sq ft. rate * * * Based on 200 units/hotel Hotel included in commercial rate. H:\049029.01\ 123\Dtripgen.WK4 /9 05/02/97 PROPOSED MASTER PLAN TRIPS-DAILY I I I : TOTAL LAND USE ,iTE CODE I ACRES SQ FT ! TRI PS ! I I INDUSTRIAL 130 129 1 3,374,157 * 17,816 ! COMMERCIAL 820 297 426,888 * * I 23,266 I I OFFICE I 750 I 127 1 1,416,625 * I 14,308 ! RESEARCH & DEVEL 760 423 398,341 3,178 HOTEL 310 52 400 * * * i 3,402 INSTITUTIONAL 530 I 293 N/A **** 2,352 I i CARMAX N/A 139 42,580 978 TOTAL I 165,300 I ! ; * Limit to rate at end of database: industrial 5 28/1,000 office 10 10/1,000 * * Multiple parcels: some may be aggregated, some may not; use 200,000 sq ft. rate * * * Based on 200 units/hotel **** Trip generation based on students, 2,500 students planned for site H:\049029.01\ 123\DPMSTR-PL.WK4 dO 05/02/97 TABLE 2D APPROVED TRIP GENERATION-DAILY , ! TOTAL LAN D USE ITE CODE UNITS QUANTITY TRIPS ! - i 1,000 sq ft. I INDUSTRIAL ; 130 4,443,120 * 23,460 I I ! ; COMMERCIAL 820 1,000 sq ft. 426,888 * * 23,266 OFFICE 750 1,000 sq ft, 1,685,772 * 1 7,026 ; ! I HOTEL 310 rooms 400 * * * 3,402 : TOTAL 67,154 * Limit to rate at end of database: industrial 528/1,000 office 10 10/1,000 ** Multiple parcels: some may be aggregated, some may not, use 200,000 sq ft. rate *** Based on 200 units/hotel Hotel included in commercial rate. H:\049029.01\ 123\Dtripgen.WK4 ;}( 05/02/97 DEPARTMENT OF ').. i ;' 11 i\PR; I II !. il J ~ 1""'\1 q i - >d 1 COM M U NIT V! !iF ~l~~~T~-j ~ ZO!'ili'lG QFl~...> STATE OF FLORIDA LAWTON CHILES Governor "Helping Floridians create safe, vibrant, sustainable communities" JAMES F MURLEY Secretary Apnlll, 1997 Ms Tambn J Heyden, DIrector Planmng Department CIty of Boynton Beach 100 E Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Flonda 33425-0310 Re Quantum Park Development of RegIOnal Impact Dear Ms Heyden The Department has revIewed the March 17, 1997, notice of proposed change for the Quantum Park development of regIOnal Impact (DR!) As proposed, the change IS to amend the development order (DO) to vacate a portIOn of Quantum Boulevard and reconfigure the adjacent lots on the master plan. In addItIon, the applIcant has further proposed to clanfy the permItted land use categones wlthm the development at the request of the Treasure Coast RegIOnal Planning CounCIl and the City of Boynton Beach. The Department belIeves that the proposed changes wIll not create any addItional regIOnal Impacts smce the traffic dIstributIOn generated from the DR! would not mcrease. Therefore, we have concluded that the proposed changes do not constitute a substantIal deVIatIon pursuant to the cntena speCIfied m Subparagraph 380 06(19)(e)2, Florida Statutes, and the Department Will not object to the proposed change flORIDA KEYS ke4 01 Critical Stale Concern Field Office 2796 Overseas Highway, Suire 212 Maralhon, Florida 330S(}.2227 CIEEN SWAMP Nea 01 Critical51ate Concern Field Office 155 East Summertin Bartow, Florida 3383ll-4641 SOUTH flORIDA IICOVEIY OfFICE P.O. Box 4022 8600 N.W 36th SIreel Miami, Florida 33159-4022 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TAllAHASSEE, flORIDA 32399 2100 Phone 904488 8466/Suncom 278 8466 FAX 904921 0781/Suncom 291 0781 Internet address http //www state fI us/comaff/dca html ~ Ms Tambn J Heyden Apnlll, 1997 Page Two If you have any questIOns regardmg thIS matter, please contact Greg Stuart, Planner IV, m the Bureau of Local Planmng at (904) 487-4545 Smcerely, (1 / ~ \ ;{j'__t, &'YJ;t/'J'- Charles GauthIer, AICP Growth Management AdmImstrator CG/ggs cc Mr James G Willard, Shutts & Bowen, LLP Mr Mike Busha, Treasure Coast RegIonal Planmng CouncIl d."3 05/09/199~ 14 56 9044883389 COr-1MUNIT\ AFFAIRS PAGE 82 . ~~~-- FLORIDA ~ =a I.^\VTO:-;<:"'J..~~ ~... covtRNQR ~ ~ - .... _.___~-"""':.o__-~ --, ") r-----:-~~..o- nrT rs r'" \ '\.........\ \5 r ~ b. \, \11 G. I f] . J I I '.':1 '.1 LS li .;;;....--,!" 'I , ~ ....1..--~--- \ I !' ! \ \'\ u \ ' , 1\ ; \ i . 'I I' , R~:d8~ I L:r J4(]O \\\!o'It Cl,lIUult!rd,1I BInI 3..d n..."r '-1. l,ol...d,,~dule, Tplfpholl~' ('1S.l) 771...&601 Fl.I.~: (95.&) 771..&61 ApnllO, 1997 Me D Ray Eubanks Planning Manager DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Dear Mr Eubanks. .. I 4 1997 SUBJECT Quantum Corpora~ Park Development of Regional Impact (DRI) City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County DCA File Number ADA-1084-048 Notice of Proposed Change (Nope) As requested in a letter from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council dated March 24, 1997, the Department has revlcwed the subject NOPC The Quantum Corporate Park DR! was approved for commercIal, office, industrial, research and development, and high school use. The NOPC proposes the followmg . Project lots which had previously been proposed for a specific use, are beine proposed to have the flexibility to be developed as an industrial, office, or commercial use. . The maximum intenSIty for any land use would not change from what has been approved in the preVIOUS development order . Hotel use could be substituted for commercUll use, as long as the mtenslty for commercial use is not exceeded . Industna! use is tleJTlg lIubstitLtted for wh:\t \Va:; formerly research a.'ld development. . Quantum Boulevard, whIch provIdes an access to a City Park. is proposed for abandonment. The traffic analysis is incomplete and does not document the trip generation rates used in the analySIS. In order not to delay the process we performed an mdependent traffic analysis usill.& trip ~eneration rates we deemed appropriate, from the ITE Trip Generation Manual 5th EdItion We have confirmed that the intersection of Gatewav Boulevard (N W 22nd A venue) and Park Ridge Boulevard/High RIdge Road Will oPerate at an acceptable level of service at full build-out, with the required Stage 4 lmp:-ovements shown In the previously submitted traffic analysis for the Master Plan Amendment Number 6. As a reView agency, lJ1 the future the Department will no longer perform independent traffic analyses. If an analysis submItted for reVIew IS Incomplete andtor not fully documented, we will reject it and the applicant will have to perform the necessary work. In order to alleViate the potential for such delays, we would suggest that applicants coordmate WIth all review ^ dcf e5/09/1~q~ 14 56 g044883:09 COMMUNIT\ AFF~IRS Ft.GE 0:1 Mr D Ray Eubanlcl April 10, 1997 Page 2 agencies regarding their proposed methodology prior to commencing the study In additlOn. the last puagraph on page 2 of the submitted traffic analysis states that Condition No. 4 of Ordinance No. 96-33 Section 2 is being modified to require monitoring of trip thresholds for every site approval on Park Ridge Road. This change is not reflected in the draft of the proposed Amended Development Order, and should be added, With the exception of this D 0 Condillon, the Department does not object to the proposed changes. Please fcc1 free to contact this office if you have any questIons. OStrow cc. Jim Snyder- TCRPC Maria Palombo-MTP Group Bob Romig John Krane FIle. 4240.20 Sl~~y, r1 C- ~/761ct~ Gustavf> Schmidt, P .E. DiStri/t Plannin@ Manager c?s- EXHIBIT "E" ~& STAFI:: RECOMMENDATION. EXHIBIT ... ~ _" 00'll" '\ 1- ,l._ If l "llJ II Ii .=-:::==-=,,=1 ,.,.~ ,., =~" .~ 1'1 ,. I 1/ 'I -, -, 1 1 1_ 1-, 1--, "'~:."'" I: ....,... I : ~~ -~~':~''';::-:~.~'''.:i'' 1!!f-J7 . ,.... .=--! --, I~~ ..:~u ,- r-:"\7"""' --- JI .\ Jt '~l I' I" " ,I' I' '~I if' :/i'! 'II, 'iil' I" llh, 'I;j' !I'I,I 1,1 'I :illll ,:/ rf';i,li !: I" ,. I','" 'I!, ,.,1,' ;r '!.. II DELETE coMMERCIAL , , . , I.a.' " , , , , . " '.~' , , , (, . - !P...JH. ., I~ J) ,t>JO _ .___ ;I ... .. . -. .!. 1-=1!~! - -.- -. '-~~~HJ=== i :/,"". f '" - l<' 1\ t ..POlIfOo"'....IIUoI"..1O.wotn""" ...Of......~JI['llOJPoGft."CC['tIDIfroCI... D'I' -c.......t NO . ...ttD f'II/'& J 1lI'b.0I'W:tr." M tllUOftoG LNG U'It C~ PO.l.D Nt' ,.em ,.. ,~..t~Ml>ClUJIIUllIIV'CIf'''''''''''''' ..,....."telCl\llll(G...J J.......n~h_...., COII~ CIICI,lAlRlI MtIO. . (LUll .,,_ 10'" CI'lOIS t.IAMa.I:--.. .. 10 lJ((UI .,. '01'" ~ ::a...I=-:'! :.'~~..::-...:.a IID.....- ....... .... JI(JNIftlI" _ 1W'CIl....... C~ l(~hDIrt. I .....1III11II....'~ttClMCIra'CI......_u.nl... =r~~ ~wl\' lii:tJ~ ~~~~. == ~,:: =m'-::"" '1r ~.ltlrSCIl(...D . == ==.:..-::- =,,~--,:, s:..:-.,::'" .:.' ::..: '110111 ---------- U -, MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 8 MARCH 8,1197 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE LEGEND - b. '" --~-- - I II nit t KEY PLAN Committed Oe.opm...' &- QUANTUM ASSOCIATES Nallonol Cllr Cenler 115 West WashIngton SI. Indianapolis. IN 46204 (317) 636-1600 Cl)I,IU (C...",...c"') 13.53 Acrtl INll (lndull,loI) 10." Ac,.. G .. I IG.........tnl../lMlltvllon..) SO... Ac'.. OfT (Ofne.) 11_," Aer.. 01 (Ofllc:./trIdll,trloll) '03.2!t Acr.. Ole (OlllcIl\ndull,loIlt_clol) 10853 Ac<.. Wetlonds 6_00 "ern Sand P.,. R....... 4~_OO Acr.. Roadt .t.13 Acr.. OPEN SPAc[~ Por.. ,........ 10.17 Ac'.. Note: Lots with handwritten land use designations noted on them are lots Impacted by this amendment. The handwritten land use Is the current approved land use, The typed land use designation, on those lots with no handwritten land use designation, Is the current approved land use. ~7 T EXHIBIT "F" d8 EXHIBIT "F" ConditIOns of Approval Project name' Quantum Park File number' MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001 Reference' The plans consist of I_sheet identified as 1 st Submittal. Master Plan ModificatIOn. File # MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments. None UTILITIES Comments. 1 The analYSIS submitted by Klmley-Horn regarding the water and sewer impacts of proposed land use changes assumed a rather low intensity water and sewer usage for the commercial land use category Whereas this may have been a reasonable assumption for the Carmax site which was under consideration that that time the analysis was submitted, the numbers used would be much too low for more mtenslve uses such as restaurants. The anticipated usage for Industrial sites is also rather low, and is based upon occupancy by a warehouse-type usage, and makes no allowance for a high intensity water user (such as BGI). The analysis submitted to date only mcluded those proposed changes along Park Ridge Boulevard. A SimIlar analysis. but With appropriately reVised flow figures. shall be submitted for all the affected lots. Sewer flows must be grouped by the lIft station service area. so that the UtilIties Department can determme If a 11ft station upgrade Will be reqUIred. The adoptIOn of a more generic type of land use designation, while increasing the flexibility of marketmg the park, may also establish conflicting impacts in close prOXimity (such as office uses sandwiched between two industrial facilities) The onginal concept of this park was to allocate each related usage to a dlstmct area. ThiS type of genenc deSignation also will require a more mtenslve review of each site plan so as to determme the actual Impacts on the water and sewer systems, and evaluate those Impacts agamst actual capacity m the delIvery systems. Staff Will be reqUIred to track the demand of each parcel, so as to determine when system capacity IS reached. With the ongmal plan, adequate capacity factors were deSigned mto the system. Those factors will likely be exceeded With the ImplementatIOn of widespread commercial land use Any upgrades required to the water and sewer systems due to this mtenslfication ofland use must be performed at the applicant's expense. (Sec.26-28). 2. The portion of Quantum Boulevard for which the applicant IS requesting abandonment contams water and sewer mam lines that cannot be abandoned. The water main IS part of an mtegrallooped system serving all ofthe facilities on Quantum Blvd., and ItS disruptIOn would reduce fire flow capability The gravity sewer also serves eXlstmg busmesses. We would require at mmimum, that an easement be dedicated over the entue right-of-way so as to assure contmued access and mamtenance to our system. Once the lots are reconfigured, an alternate system can be designed and constructed by the applicant, after Utility Department approval, so as to mamtam unmterrupted service to the area. FIRE Comments. 3 The Fire Department takes exceptIOn to the proposed vacating of dCJ Page 2 Quantum Park File No. MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Quantum Blvd. and recommends denial. Without any alternate routes proposed, the Fire Department feels that without the mput of park tenants and neighbors, the Fire Department would do a disservice to the citizens of Boynton given the experience with responses on Gateway Blvd., at peak hours. POLICE Comments. None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments 4 The future vacating and closing of Quantum Blvd. per the applicant's request will create a dead-end road from Gateway Blvd. some 2500 feet long. The maximum allowable length of a dead-end street IS 1320 feet per Chapter 6 of the LDR (page 6-11) Therefore, closing of Quantum Blvd. is not recommended. 5 If the Commission approves the vacatmg of the subject portion of Quantum Blvd, It is recommended to deed Lot 31 to the City for park purposes and relocate and construct Quantum Blvd. northward along the E-4 canal to intersect Miner Road, mcludmg buffenng along the canal. ThiS prOVides not only an effiCient access to the park and Gateway Blvd., but also faster response time 6 Revise note 5 ofthe master plan to indicate that a city approval of an abandonment apphcation will be reqUIred to close Quantum Blvd. BUILDING DIVISION Comments. None PARKS AND RECREATION Comments. 7 Blocking of Quantum Blvd. ehmmatmg the western portIOn of the loop road will Impact the proposed Quantum City Park and is not recommended. The master plan for this park includes an entrance way and parking on the south portIOn of the park. Due to the awkward shape of this property, parkmg for some of the playmg fields in park is located near the southern entrance Smce the shape ofthe property also does not allow for a through road to Miner Road, closing off a portion of Quantum Blvd. will cause viSitors to the park to decide in advance which fields they are going to utihze People coming from the west who are planmng to use the south playing fields will be forced to drive out of their way to get to that field. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments. 8 There are numerous natural resource areas on the Quantum Corporate Park properties that have not been properly maintamed. These areas include the 40 acre Sand Pme preserve, the Wetlands, the lakes, the individual lots microsltes and roadway medlans/r o.w's The applicant shall submit a comprehensive mamtenance schedule to systematically address each of the above locations to perform the proper mamtenance. The above locations which are adjacent to parcels at Quantum Park under development, should be the pnonty for maintenance. Carmax Sand Pine preserve B G.!. ~and Pine preserve JO Page 3 Quantum Park File No. MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Hampton Inn. Lake adjoining parcel Flowers Bakery Wetlands All projects. Roadway medians, row PLANNING AND ZONING Comments. 9 Gateway Boulevard shall be wIdened wIth two additIOnal lanes at a time reqUIred by the regional planmng councIl and Palm Beach County 10 Master plan shall be revised to mclude 1,430,000 GF A of office. 11 Revise master plan to mclude a maximum of 400 hotel rooms. 12. Add to the master plan the p.m. peak hour trip generatIon of the project. 13 Annual momtonng at the mtersection of Gateway Boulevard and Park RIdge Boulevard shall be performed at the end of every year to determine when and what Improvements are needed to maintam the intersection at the adopted level of servIce. 15 Delete mdustnal on lots 3, 22-31 and 6-11 15 Add mdustnal on lots 12-14 16 Delete commercial on lots 17-19,21,39,52,56,57, 72, 70, 69, 73A, 73B, 74, 75, 81, 82, 83-85, 68A and 68B 17 Delete commercIal, but retam hotel use on lots 66, 67 A and 67C 18 Add office to lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 19 To improve the appearance of potentIal industrial buildmgs along Gateway Boulevard, in addItIon to complIance with the CIty'S Commumty DeSIgn Plan, bUIldmgs shall be designed to mcorporate window openmgs (sImulated If not actual), glass blocks, wall offsets, extenor fimsh matenal dIfferentiation, ceramic tIles or other accent features, and stucco Joints. 20 If commercial development is approved on parcels 83, 84, and/or 85, and access from said parcels IS provIded to High RIdge Road, the CIty may request an update of the traffic study dated June 10, 1996 to evaluate the order and thresholds oftnp generatIOn whIch define the tIming of improvements outlIned m that study If the updated study shows the need to modIfY the stagmg of such Improvements, then such modIficatIOn wIll be made a condItIon of approval of site development for the parcel or parcels m question or of another site mutually agreed to by the CIty and the developer ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 21 To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 22. To be determined. /bme s:\projects\cond of appr\ ~I REQUEST FOR PUBLISHING LEGAL NOTICES AND/OR LEGAL ADVERTISEMENTS A completed copy of this routing slip must accompany any request to have a Legal Notice or Legal Advertisement published and must be submitted to the Office of the City Attorney eight (8) working days prior to the first publishing date requested below ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Planning and Zoning Department PREPARED BY Tambri J. HeYden DATE PREPARED' April 30.1997 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NOTICE OR AD' Quantum Park notice of proposed change to the DRI development order to change the master plan land use designation of lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,22,23,24.25.26,27.28.29,30.31,2.3.15, 16,40A, 1,66, 67A.67C. 12, 13, 14,32,33, 34A, 34B. 35, 36. 37. 38,17.18.19.21.39,52,81.82.83,84,85,40.58,59.60. 61. 62, 86, 87, 88. 89A, 89B. 90B,65A. 65B,67B,91,63,64,90A,68A,68B,56,57,69, 70, 72. 73A, 73B, 74.75, 46A. 48A. 48B, 48C. 50A. SOB, 51B. 51D, 76. 77, 78, 79 and 80 and sever Quantum Boulevard between lots 22 and 31 and lots 6 through 11. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS (Size of Headline, Type Size, Section Placement, Black Border, etc.) Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 (19) (f) of Florida Statues, there appears to be no special reauirements. SEND COPIES OF AD TO Planning & Zoning Dept.. Quantum Associates, Agent: James G. Willard, Newspaper, City Attorney NEWSPAPER(S) TO PUBLISH The Post (newspaper of general circulation), since this is a proiect of regional impact. DATE(S) TO BE PUBLISHED Minimum once, 15 days prior to public hearing date of May 20, 1997, Le. May 5. 1997. APPROVED BY 5tr!f1 (mat ) (2) (City Attorney) (Date) (3) (City Manager) (Date) RECEIVED BY CITY CLERK. COMPLETED' s. \projects\quantum\legal notices \legal-DR I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that City Commission of THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, will conduct a Public Hearing at 7 00 P M or as soon thereafter as the agenda permits on Tuesday, May 20, 1997, in the City Hall Commission Chambers, 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida. The purpose of this public hearing is to consider a proposed change to the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Development Order (Ordinance No 84-51) as amended by Ordinances Nos 86-11, 86-37 and 88-3, 94-10, 94-51, 96-33 and 96-65 and determination as to whether or not the proposed change constitutes a substantial deviation to the approved development order with respect to the property described below located within the corporate limits of said City, pursuant to the request of the parties in interest and in compliance with Chapter 380, Florida Statutes REQUEST QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH DRI Formerly Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact LEGAL DESCRIPTION A Tract of land lying partially in Sections 16, 17, 20 and 21, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, said Tract being more particularly described as follows. Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Section 17, thence North 1 E44'39" East, along the West line of Section 17, a distance of 1318 10 feet to a point in the intersection with the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, as recorded in 0 R. Book 1738, Page 1686, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, thence with a bearing of North 89E04'32" East, along the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, a distance of 778 37 feet to the Point of Beginning, thence North 1 E44'39" East, a distance of 1247 06 feet to the South right of way line of L.W D D Lateral 21, thence North 89E08'49" East along the South right of way line L.W D D Lateral 21, as recorded in 0 R. Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, a distance of 635 93 feet to the centerline of the L. W D D Equalizing Canal E-4, as recorded in 0 R. Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, thence along the centerline of the above described E-4 Canal with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of North 10E32'52" East, a radius of 750 00 feet, a central angle of 4E04'17", and an arc length of 5329 feet; thence continue along the centerline of the E-4 Canal, with a bearing of North 12E35'OO" East, a distance of 320 69 feet to a point of curve, thence with a curve to the left having a radius of 650000, a central angle of 3E28'30", and an arc length of 394.23 feet; thence North 9E06'30" East, a distance of 1979 16 feet to a point on the North Line of Section 17, thence with a bearing of North 89E16'39" East, along the North line of Section 17, a distance of 196450 feet; thence South OE02' 11" East, a distance of 2625 18 feet; thence North 89E08'49" East, a distance of 368 96 feet to a point on the North right of way line of N W 22nd Avenue as recorded in 0 R. Book 1738, Page 1686 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, thence South 19E27'31" East, a distance of 50 00 feet to the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, thence with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of North 75E29'49" East, a radius of 163702 feet, a central angle of 9E53'58", and an arc length of 282.85 feet to a point; thence north 12E02'41" East, a distance of 915 72 feet; thence NorthOE31'11" East, a distance of 39970 feet; thence North 89E12'37" East, a distance of 41321 feet; thence South 88E22'56" East, a distance of 134970 feet to a point on the West right of way line of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad; thence South OE28'21" East, along the West right of way line of the Railroad, a distance of 130909 feet to a point on the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, thence North 88E27'31" West, along the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue a distance of 672.97 feet; thence South OE33'53" East, a distance of 130669 feet; thence South 88E45'31" East, a distance of 333 51 feet to a point on the West right of way of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad, thence with a bearing of South 14E08'23" West, along the West right of way of the railroad, a distance of 131249 feet; thence South OE33'53" East, a distance of 26 69 feet; thence South 13E 15'22" West, a distance of 920 57 feet; thence North 88E50'04" West, a distance of 18760 feet; thence with a bearing North OE49'21" West, a distance of 20000 feet; thence North 88E50'04" West, a distance of 21800 feet; thence South OE49'21" East, a distance of 20000 feet; thence North 88E50'04" West, a distance of 4000 feet; thence South OE49'21" East a distance of 556 84 feet; thence North 88E50'04" West, a distance' of 361726 feet to a point on the centerline of the above described centerline. of the E-4 Canal; thence with a bearing of North 5E18'14" West, a dIstance of 153 13 feet, thence with a curve to the right having a Page 2 Quantum Park - Notice of Public Hearing radius of 450 00 feet, a central angle of 15E36'44", and an arc length of 122.62 feet; thence North 10E18'30" East, a distance of 988 60 feet to a point of curve, thence with a curve to the left having a radius of 450 00 feet, a central angle of 18E20'OO", and an arc length of 143 99 feet; thence with a bearing of North 8E01'30" West, a distance of 125514 feet to a point on the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue, thence with a bearing of South 89E04'32" West, along the centerline of N W 22nd Avenue a distance of 81785 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning Containing 591 55 acres more or less and subject to easements and rights of way of record. 591 55 AC 51 70 AC 539 85 AC GROSS LAND AREA OF QUANTUM PARK LESS ROADWAY & CANAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD NET LAND AREA OF QUANTUM PARK Together with the addition of all land (lots 80, 81 and 82) lying within the plat of the P C D Center, containing 13 17 acres, as recorded in Plat Book 60, Pages 106 and 107, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, for a total proposed net land area of 55302 acres. PROPOSED CHANGES 1) Change in traffic distribution due to possible future severing of Quantum Boulevard between lots 22 and 31 and lots 6 through 11 2) Change in the master plan designation of lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,2,3, 15, 16 and 40A from office to office/industrial use, 3) Change in the master plan designation of lots 1, 66, 67 A and 67C from office/hotel use to office/industrial/commercial use, 4) Change in the master plan designation of lots 12, 13 and 14 from office/research and development to office use, 5) Change in the master plan designation of lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 from office/industrial to industrial use, 6) Change in the master plan designation of lots 17, 18, 19, 21, 39, 52, 81, 82, 83, 84 and 85 from office to office/industrial/ commercial use, 7) Change in the master plan designation of lot 40 from office/government and institutional to government and institutional use, 8) Change in the master plan designation of lots 58, 59, 60, 61 AND 62 from industrial/research and development to office/industrial use, 9) Change in the master plan designation of lots 86, 87, 88, 89A, 89B and 90B from research and development to office/industrial use, 10) Change in the master plan designation of lots 65A, 65B, 67B and 91 from office/hotel/commercial to office/industrial/commercial use, 11) Change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 from office/commercial to office/industrial/commercial use, 12) Change in the master plan designation of lot 90A from research and development to government and institutional use, 13) Change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 68B from research and development to office/industrial/commercial use, 14) Change in the master plan designation of lots 56, 57 69, 70, 72, 73A, 73B 74 and 75 from industrial to office/industrial/commercial use, Page 3 Quantum Park - Notice of Public Hearing 15) Change in the master plan designation of lots 46A, 48A, 488, 48C, 50A, 50B, 51 Band 510 from industrial to office/industrial use, 16) Change in the master plan designation of lots 76, 77, 78 and 79 from industrial/commercial to commercial use, and 17) Change in the master plan designation of lot 80 from office to commercial use, APPLICANT Quantum Associates AGENT James G Willard, Esquire Shutts & Bowen All interested parties are notified to appear at said hearing in person or by attorney and be heard Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. PUBLISH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (561 )375-6260 The Post May 5, 1997 s \projects\quantum\legal notices\legal-DRI