REVIEW COMMENTS
ANNUALSTATUSREPORi
Reportmg Penod 1997
1U:CETVFD
QUANTUM PARK
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
DISTRIBUTION LIST
^ f)'~ ~ lcqR
~TY MANAGER'S OFFICE.
..
-,.
REPORT ADDRESSES
Ms. Keny Willis
CIty Manager
CIty of Boynton Beach
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, FL ~3425-03l 0
Mr Jim Golden
Semor Planner, Regulation Department
South Flonda Water Management DIstnct
3301 Gun Club Road
West Palm Beach, Flonda 33402
Mr James Snyder
DR! Coordinator
Treasure Coast RegIOnal Plannmg Council
3228 S W Martm Downs Blvd., SUIte 205
POBox 1529
Palm CIty, Flonda 34990
Mr Brad Hartman
DIrector Office of EnvIronmental ServIces
Flonda Game & Freshwater Fish Comm.
620 South MendIan Street
Tallahassee, Flonda 32399-1600
Ms. DebbIe Pamsh
Duector of Intergovernmental Programs
State of Florida
Department of Envuonmental Protection
3900 Commonwealth Blvd./MS 47
Tallahassee, Flonda 32399-2400
Mr Donald L. Lockhart
Duector ofPlannmg and AdrmmstratlOn
Palm Beach County Sohd Waste Authonty
5114 Okeechobee Boulevard, SUIte 2C
West Palm Beach, Flonda 33417-4575
Mr James F Murley, Secretary
Department of Commumty AffaIrs
2571 Executive Center CIrcle, East
Tallahassee, Flonda 32301
Mr Charles PattIson, DIrector
DIV of Resource Plannmg & Management
Bureau of State Plannmg
2740 CentervIew Dnve
Tallahassee, Flonda 32399
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
Reportmg Penod 1997
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
QUANTUM PARK f/k/a
QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK f/k/a
QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH f/k/a
BOYNTONBEACHPARKOFCOMNffiRCE
FOR THE PERIOD - JANUARY 1,1997 to DECEMBER 31,1997
-2-
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
Reportmg Penod 1997
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
REPORTING PERIOD
JANUARY 1, 1997 to DECEMBER 31, 1997
DEVELOPMENT
QUANTUM PARK f/k/a
QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK f/k/a
QUANTUM P ARK AT BOYNTON BEACH f/k/a
BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
(Name ofDRI)
LOCATION
CIty'
County'
BOYNTON BEACH
PALM BEACH COUNTY
DEVELOPER,
Name
QUANTUM ASSOCIATES, a Flonda General PartnershIp
Address
Merchants Plaza 15th Floor - East Tower
115 West Waslungton Street
IndIanapolIs, IN 46204
1 Descnbe any changes made m the proposed plan of development, phasmg, or m the representatIOns
contamed m the ApplIcatIOn for Development Approval smce the Development of RegIonal Impact
received approval. Note any actIOns (substantial deViation detemllnatIOns) taken by local
government to address these changes.
Note If a response IS more than one sentence, attach as ExhibIt A a detaIled descnptIOn of each
change and copIes of the modified SIte plan drawings. Exhibit A should also address the followmg
Items If applIcable
a. Describe changes m the plan of development or phasmg for the reportmg penod and subsequent
years.
b State any known mcremental DRI applIcatIOns for development approval or request for a
substantial deViatIOn determination that were filed in the reporting period and to be filed
durmg the next year
-3-
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
Reportmg Penod 1997
c. Attach a copy of any notice of the adoptIon of a development order or the subsequent
modIficatIOn of an adopted development order that was recorded by the developer pursuant
~ to SubsectIOn 380 06(14), F S
~ ~ ~SPONSE SEE EXlllBIT A ANNEXED HERETO
2 Has there been a change m local government junsdIctIOn for any portIon ofthe development smce the
development order was Issued? If so, has the annexmg local government adopted a new
Development of Regional Impact development order for the project? ProvIde a copy of the order
adopted by the annexmg local government.
RESPONSE THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT JURISDICTION
3 ProVIde copIes of any revIsed masterplans, mcremental site plans, etc., not prevIOusly submItted.
RESPONSE SEE EXHIBIT B ANNEXED HERETO
4 ProVIde a summary comparIson of development actIvIty proposed and actually conducted for the
reportmg period as well as a cumulatIve total of development proposed and actually conducted to
date.
RESPONSE SEE EXHIBIT C ANNEXED HERETO
5 Have any undeveloped tracts ofland m the development (other than indIVIdual smgle-family lots) been
sold durmg the reportmg penod to a separate entity or developer? If so, Identify tract, Its SIze, and
the buyer ProvIde maps whIch show the tracts mvolved.
RESPONSE. SEE EXHIBIT D ANNEXED HERETO
6 Describe any lands purchased or optIOned adjacent to the ongmal Development of RegIOnal Impact SIte
subsequent to Issuance of the development order Identify such land, ItS SIze, and mtended use on
a SIte plan and map.
RESPONSE SEE EXHIBIT E ANNEXED HERETO
-4-
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
Reportmg Penod 1997
7 LIst any substantial local, state, and federal permits wmch have been obtained, apphed for, or demed,
dunng tills reportmg penod. SpecIfy the agency, type of permIt, and duty of each.
RESPONSE SEE EXHIBIT F ANNEXED HERETO
8 PrOVIde a hst specIfymg each development order conditIon and each developer commItment as contaIned
m the ADA and state how and when each condItIOn or commItment has been comphed wIth dunng
the annual reportmg penod.
Note Attach as ExhibIt "G"
RESPONSE SEE EXHIBIT G ANNEXED HERETO
9 PrOVIde any mformatIon that IS specIfically reqUired by the Development Order to be mcluded m the
annual report.
RESPONSE SEE EXHIBIT H ANNEXED HERETO
10 PrOVIde a statement certIfymg that all persons have been sent copIes of the annual report m conformance
wIth Subsections 380 06(15) and (18), F S
RESPONSE THAT THE UNDERSIGNED, ON BEHALF OF THE DEVELOPER, CERTIFIES
THAT ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN SENT COPIES OF THIS ANNUAL STATUS REPORT IN
CONFORMANCE WITH SECTIONS 380906(15) AND (18), FLA. STATS (1989)
Person Completmg the
QuestIOnnaIre
James G Willard, EsqUire
Title
Attorney and Authonzed Agent
Representmg'
Quantum SImon, Inc., m its capaCIty as a general partner of Quantum
ASSOCIates
Ongmal Report:
CIty of Boynton Beach
-5-
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
Reportmg Period 1997
EXHIBIT A
CHANGES IN THE PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT
1 The followmg IS a lIst of the Amendments to the DR! Development Order winch have been
approved.
A. On June 3,1997 the CIty ComnussIOn of the CIty of Boynton Beach adopted
Ordmance No 97-20, which further amended the Development Order for the Quantum Park
DR! by adoptmg revIsed Master SIte Development Plan No 8
B On December 17, 1996, the City ComnussIOn of the CIty of Boynton Beach
adopted Ordmance No 96-65, which further amended the Development Order for the
Quantum Park DR! by adoptmg revIsed Master SIte Development Plan No 7, winch mcludes
mdustnal and research and development, together WIth office use, as a permItted land use for
Lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37, and 38 WIthIn Quantum Park and to change Lots 80, 81
and 82 from office to mdustnal/commercIal use.
C On July 16, 1996, the CIty CommISSIon of the CIty of Boynton Beach adopted
Ordmance No 96-33, wmch further amended the Development Order for the Quantum Park
DR! by adoptmg revIsed Master SIte Development Plan No 6, winch added Lots 80, 81 and
82 to the DR! and mcluded commercIal use as a permItted land use for Lots 65A, 65B, 76,
77, 78, 79 and 91 WIthm Quantum Park, and deleted commercIal use as a pernutted land use
for Lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62 wIthm Quantum Park.
D On November 15, 1994, the CIty CommIssion of the CIty of Boynton Beach
adopted Ordmance No 94-51, winch further amended the Development Order for the
Quantum Park DR! by adoptmg Master Site Development Plan No.5, winch revised the land
use desIgnatIOn of Lots 12, 13 and 14 from office to office/research and development.
E. On Apnl 19, 1994, the CIty CommISSIOn of the City of Boynton Beach
adopted Ordmance No 94-10, winch further amended the Development Order for the
Quantum Park DR! by adoptmg Master SIte Development Plan No 4, which reflects the
locatIOn of a 46.38 acre publIc hIgh school SIte m the southwest portIon of Quantum Park
DR!, and reduced 30.29 acres ofmdustnal, 12.54 acres of research and development, and
-6-
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
Reportmg Penod 1997
3.55 acres of roadway, as well as the redeslgnation of Tract 40 as
office/governmentaVinstItutIonal and Tract 41-A as research and development/governmental
and mstItutIOnal.
F On February 2, 1988, the CIty CommISSIon of the CIty of Boynton Beach
adopted Ordmance No 88-3, wmch further amended the Development Order for the
Quantum Park DR! by adoptmg Master SIte bevelopment Plan No 3
G On October 21, 1986, the City CommIssIon of the CIty of Boynton Beach
adopted Ordmance No 86-37, which further amended the Development Order for the
Quantum Park DR! by adoptmg Master SIte Development Plan No 2, and by changmg the
name of the development to Quantum Park at Boynton Beach, as well as requmng that the
Development Order be revIsed to conform to the Memorandum from R. Thomas Powers to
Ed Deutsch, dated July 3, 1986, and the Traffic AnalYSIS Updated prepared by K.1mely-Hom
and ASSOCIates, Inc., dated July 3, 1986
H. On June 3, 1986, the CIty CommISSIOn of the CIty of Boynton Beach adopted
Ordmance No 86-11, WhICh amended the Development Order for the Quantum Park DR!
by adoptmg the Amended Master SIte Development Plan, and by requmng that the
Development Order be reVIsed to conform to the representatIOns set forth m the letter from
George W Zimmerman to Carmen Annuziato, dated February 28, 1986
I a. F or a descnptIOn of changes m the plan of development for the reportmg penod, please reVIew Items
A-H hsted above.
1 b At tlus tIme, there are no requests for substantial devIatIOn determmatIOns that are expected to be filed
m 1998
1 c. CopIes of the notIces of the AdoptIOn of the Development Order and notIces of all subsequent
modificatIOns to the Development Order are attached hereto, Exhibit A-I
-7-
PROPOSAL OF OUANTUM ASSOCIATES FOR MAY 20TH
BOYNTON BEACH CITY COMMISSION MEETING
Quantum Associates hereby amends its master plan modification
and proposes the following conditions be adopted by the City
Commission in addition to the recommendations of the Planning and
Development Board
32
Delete commercial from Lots 83, 84, 85, 68A, 68B, 69, 70,
72, 57, 56, 73B, 73A, 74, 75 and 76 (The result of this
deletion will be to expand potential commercial use only
(~t_s~~d for hotel use, i e Lots IJ
Delete condition 20 of Exhibit "F" (no longer needed
since virtually all of the commercial expansion has been
eliminated)
OK33
o Is( 34
Delete note
Amendment No
5 on the
8
proposed March
6
Master
Plan
@/-L
Replace "club" with "restaurant" on note 2 of the Master
Plan .--- ------~----~- -.~------------~-____..
~ 36.~te a revised Master Site Development Plan Amendment
~ jI ~~~Q 8 dated today, May 20, 1997, consistent with
t C tonight's City Commission action and direct staff to
generate a new proposed Ordinance incorporating the
<I> revis,ed May 20 Master Plan Amendme;'t ~--=------__
?Iff. ~'----- ---
(i/) J 1
35
.._~._----------
r-~_ 4==~
~~-~
ORL95 51005.1 SMW
05120/97
;/ - .pf7;?-
J~/LS~ iLl It~P~
V f6 .
LITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORillA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
FROM.
PLANNING & ZONING DATE.
DEPARTMENT
IIA~UBJECT
SGT MARLON HARRISWV~REFERENCES
POLICE DEPARTMENT
22 MAY 97 FILE.
TO'
QUANTUM PARK DR!
23
ENCLOSURES L-~7"" ,. '
( V~:t '{ ;. ~._.' ~
\ ----'~.,.
Regarding the Quantum Park DR!, there IS no cost incurred for reVIew of the plans.- .
05!27/1597 16 14 5613647382
~
W
FI RE PRE\,
~~e CUff 0/ Bo'lnlon Beach
:lire - !<eJctu :1>epaJ"lmenl
Fire Prevention Division
C/O The City of Boynton Beach
1 00 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
FAX
FAX
FAX
TO' Tambn Heyden~ Planning DIViSIon
FAX #. 561-375-6259
FROM. W. Cavanau&b. FPO I
FAX # 561-364..7382
SUBJECT Abandonment of Quantum Blvd.
REMARKS
FAX
PAGE 131
NO OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER. 3
OS/27/1997 16 14
561:1::47382
FI RE PRE\!
Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 97-251 continued
The following is the approximate cost for the Fire Department to review this
project, including secretarial support:
W Cavanaugh:
L Morales
1 hr @ $37 50 per hr
1 hr. @ $12.07 oef hr.
Total
$49.57 (pay rate Include benefits)
PAGE 02
MEMORANDUM
Utilities #97-145
~ .., ~; (
i i UJ r-"-~'''"-'
II n H
j!::!1l f./\2?
.....;. ~~"_! ; L
L.o
,
~ ~~~e,......~'
TO.
Tambn Heyden, Director-j'
Plannlllg & Zon~ \
John A. GUIdry, \\ \J
Utilities Director ~
May 19, 1997
FROM.
DATE
SUBJECT
Quantum Park DR!
Master Plan Modification - First Review
The followlllg lllformatIon llldIcates the staff tIme and admIlllstrabve costs for the above
referenced project:
Peter Mazzella - 3 hours @ $27.23/hour + 30% Frlllge Benefits = $106 19
Clyde Milor - 1 hour @ $20.53/hour + 30 % Frlllge Benefits = $ 26 69
Total
$13288
19b
xc Peter Mazzella
SkIp MIlor
File
rr.r.! - _ ~- J r"' ~ y-
Ii t:.i: 'JM
3 f!!
~EArE [T L
.~ ~
j
-
"
,
" ~
... ~ -'I~
5~qq
~
w
t?
MEMORANDUM
UtilitIes #97- i 45
DA TB.
fambn Heyden. Director ,
Planning & Zo~ ~ ;1
John A. GUidry, \ \. %
Utilities Director \j .
Ma) 19, 1997
TO'
FROM.
SUBJECT
Quantum Park DR!
Master Plan Modification - First Review
The following mfonnatlon indicates the staff~ime and admlnlstr~lve casts for the above
retcfel,ced proJect.
peter Mazzella - 3 hours @ $27 .23/hour + 30% fnllge Benefits "" $) 06.l9
Clyde Mllor - I hour @ $20 S3/hO'Jr - 30 ~ Fnnge Bc;nefits = $ 26 .69
Total
$132.88
19b
xc' Peter Mazzella
Skip Milor
File
!\
~~\A
~i
~t/Y!..1-j -
{!jUJ/l ~Jw~
r1p~
(\J 0 rid- ','
C ~"" . IU
'h,u.-t rtG0-<-:co-e._A-9' ~\~tti/
')~ ~~~- ~U-
LL~ {.{:~~ (;c G--t4:t-l,., r-
u--- ---
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-224
TO
FROM
Tambri Heyden, Planing & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks superintenden~
Quantum Park D R. I.
Date
May 16, 1 997
fDI rlli~@~]_.L W lli 1 ill
\ : J\ 1 ! II
!' n : ,r"'7 ,U
:;. .. Ai' I" ". .
;\ i I h I"Y I 6 ,.,.~ I ;
P..JWi ' J
~I 1.----. l
P. ,. J' plD
f L....:.' \\J r.I'I
ZbN:f~G DEFT.
RE.
During the recent review of the plans for the Quantum Park D R I The following costs
were incurred
Parks Superintendent
1 hour == $29 00
JW
RECREA TION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-226
TO
FROM
RE
DATE.
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist KJ ff
Quantum Park 0 R.I.
May 16, 1997
The following is a cost for my review to complete the above
Forester/Environmentalist - 1 hour - $24 95
KHad
r
'CO ("" :? n ,Ii P n
Ii> ,!U h I'!! I" ! n I
f.:! \~!--l-~::..".L.~. \.1'"1 l ~ I
, · i Ii ! I
~ or, q I
l! ~.^^V I 9/"17 ~ f
! i ~ I.!~' e#../
.... - l .
, i
L_.~~-~. ___-----I
P7L~ ~,!;;Q"b~[) j
> f..,1: Ln... V..I ..
-~.-_-
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO 97-094
May 16, 1997
TO
Tambn Heyden
Planmng and Zonmg DIrector
FROM.
Al Newbold
Deputy DIrector of Development
RE
QUANTUM PARK D.R.I. - REVIEW TIME & CHARGES
Time and charges for the last reVIew of thIS proJect, mcludmg clerical tIme, are as follows.
Consultmg engmeer John Yeend
1hr
$12500
Anthony OCChlUZZO
1.5 hrs.
34.32
Ken Hall
1.5 hrs.
3482
Carol Kribs
5hr
12.81
Total cost
$206.95
.A(/~.. /'/.~ r~l/
t..;!(/ ~ J.," It}' "'"
AI New. old
bg
XC Milan Knor
C:\BOYNTON\Documents\TRC\Quantum Park DRI.doc
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORAi.'1DUM NO 97-213
TO Chauman and Members
Planrung and Development Board
FROM Tambri J Heyden, AICP --;};L-
Plannmg and ZOnIng DIrector
DA IE May 8, 1997
SUBJECT Quantum Park - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
Master Plan Amendment No 8 (combine land uses, add optIonal uses to lots,
sever Quantum Boulevard)
NA TIJRE OF REOUEST
Quantum Park of Commerce, a partIally bwlt-out Development of Regional Impact (DR!)
comprised of 539 9 acres, zoned PID (Planned Industnal Development), IS located on the wesr
sIde of 1-95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton (C-16) Canal (see attached locatton
map - 2xhibit "A"). James G. Willard, EsqUire and agent for Quantum Associates, property
owner of the Quantum Park of Commerce, has requested an amendment to their DRI
development order, Ordinance No. 84-51 as amended by Ordinance No. 86-11, 86-37, 88-3, 94-
10, 94-51, 96-33 and 96-65 The proposed amendments whIch revise the master plan (master SIte
development plan) are as follows.
1) Change in traffic distribution due to possible future severing of Quantum
Boulevard between lots 22 and 31 and lots 8 through 11
2) Change in the master plan designation of lots 8, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. 22, 23, 24, 25,
28,27,28,29,30,31,2,3, 15, 18 and 40A from office to officeJindustrial use.
3) Change in the master plan designation of lots 1, 66, 87 A and 67C from
otllcelhotel use to officeJindustrial/commercial use;
4) Ch.nge in the master plan designation of lots 12, 13 and 14 from office/research
... development to office use;
---~----
5) CIwIge in the master plan designation of lots 32, 33. 34A, 348, 35, 36, 37 a~,
38 from otrIcelindustrial to industrial use;
8) Change in the master plan designation of lots 17,18, 19.21,39. 52,83,84 and
85 from offtce to officelindustrial/commercial use;
7) Change in the master plan designation of lot 40 from otIIceIgovernment and
institutional to government and institutional use;
8) Change in the master plan designation of lots 58, 59, 80, 81 and 62 from
industrial/research and development to officelindustrial use;
9) Change in the master plan designation of lots 88. 87, 88. 89A, 89B and 90B from
research and development to office/industrial use;
10) Change in tM meeter plan deslgnauon of Iota 65A, 858, 678 and 91 from
otficelhoteUcommercial to offtcelindustriallcommerciaJ use;
11) Change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 from otrIcelcommercial
to ofrIcelindustriallcommercial use;
12) Change in the master plan designation of lot 90A from research and
development to government and institutional use;
I
.,.
..,
Page 2
Memorandum No. 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-0011DRIA 97-001
13) Change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 68B from research and
development to office/industrial/commercial use,
14) Change In the master plan designation of lots 56, 57 69, 70, 72, 73A, 73B, 74
and 75 from industrial to office/industrial/commercial use,
15) Change in the master plan designation of lots 46A, 48A, 48B, 48C 50A, SOB
51 Band 51 0 from industrial to office/industrial use;
16) Change in the master plan designation of lots 76, 77, 78 and 79 from
industrial/commercial to commercial use,
17) Change in the master plan designation of lot 80 from industriaVcommercial to
commercial use, and
~ Change In the master plan designation of lots 81 and 82 from
Industnal/commercial to office/industrial/commercial use.
BACKGROUND
.
The amendment request is governed by Section 7 of Appendix A, Zoning, City of Boynton
Beach Code of Ordinances, which establishes Planned Industrial Development Districts and by
Chapter 38006 (19) (e) (2), Florida Statutes, Developments of Regional Impact - Substantial
Deviations. This amendment is submitted in connection With a request from the apphcant that:
1) the city make a determination that the master plan amendment is not substantial in
nature and
2) the proposed change to the Quantum Park DR! development order
a) is not a substantial deviation and
b) does not require further Development of Regional Impact review
A public hearing must be conducted by the City Commission prior to making a determination as
to whether the proposed change is substantial In nature and whether further development of
regional impact review is required. If no further review is required, the City Commission shall
issue an amended development order which, In this mstance, requires the passage of an ordinance
which amends the original development order If a determination is made that the proposed
change requires further development of regional impact review, the review shall be conducted
only on those aspects of the development order reqUIred to be changed.
The required public hearing shall receive a fifteen (15) day public notice, following the passage
of thirty (30) days, but not more than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the amendment
mateiials. The City Commission will conduct Its heanog on May 20, 1997, as advertised, and if
the City Commission determines the proposed changes to be non-substantial, with no further
review required, first poAI'tiT'g of the amended Quantum Park development order (an ordinance)
will occur on May 20, 1997 as well.
On December 17, 1996, the City Commission approved an amendment to the Quantum Parle
master plan in connection with the seventh amendment to the Quantum Park DR! development
order At this time, the Commission agreed to retam note 4 on the master plan in exchange for
Quantum Park preparing a revised master plan having a "use trading matrix", prior to any future
change to a lot deSignated commercial on the Quantum Park master plan. Note 4 reads, "Lots
~
Page 3
Memorandum No. 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
WithIn the project may be changed/relocated by approval of the City Commission without further
DRI review or amendment." The subject request has been submitted to address the
Comnllsslon s December 17, 1996 duectlon to the applicant wluch IS necessary now to allow
approval of a restaurant (commercial) on the recently approved Hampton Inn parcel (lot 1)
ANAL YSIS
J Exlublt B contaIns the proposed master site development plan. Added to each lot Impacted by
I this request are the current approved land use designatIOns for ease of comparison within this
/ exhibit. The chart below summanzes the nwnber of lots Impacted by this request.
#"... ""\ / ~------------,---,,----/,- -~~-----'- ~------c.--,_-
FROM TO NUMBER OF LOTS LOT NUMBERS
Office Office Industrial 21 6,7,8,9,10,11,22.23
24,25,26,27.28,29
30,31,2,3,15,16,40A
OfficeIHote1 Office Industrial Commercial 4 1 66, 67 A, 67C
OfficeIResearch &: Development Office 3 12,13 14
t OfficelIndustrial Industrial 8 32, 33, 34A, 348, 35
36,37,38
\.
Offic~ Office Industrial Commercial 9 17, 18, 19 21 39 52
83, 84, 85
Office/ Government &: IDstitutioaaI Government &: Institutional 1 40
IndustriaJ/Resarc &: [)evelopD_ Office Industrial 5 58, 59, 60, 61 62
Research &: OiL . . ,., Office Industrial 6 86,87,88, 89A. 898,
908
OfficelHoeft'O --rciaI Office Industrial Commercial 4 6SA, 658, 678. 91
Office/Commercial Office Industrial Commercial 2 63.64
Research &: Development Government &: Institutional 1 90A
Research &: Development Office Industrial Commercial 2 68A. 688
Industrial Office Industrial Commercial 9 56.57.69, 70. 72.
73A. 738. 74 75
Industrial Office Industrial 8 46A. 48A. 488, 48C,
SOA. 50B, 51B. 510
Industrial/Commercial Commercial 4 76. 77, 78, 79
IndustriallCommercial CIJr"..JJlen:ial 1 80
Industrial/Commercial Oftic:eIIDdustriallCommercial 2 81.82
As shown 10 the chart above, the option of industnal is being added to a net of 34 lots; the optIon
of commercial is being added to a net of 24 lots; and the option of office is being added to a net
of211ots. Exhibit C graphically 1llustrates the lot locations of the optional land uses of primary
3
--
~
Page 4
Memorandum No. 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-0011DRlA 97-001
mterest. In general terms. mdustnalls bemg added to the northwest comer of the PID (adjacent
to the Dos Lagos PUD). at the northeast comer of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road and
on the south SIde of Gateway Boulevard, between Quantum Lakes Dnve and Park Ridge
Boulevard. ComrnercIalls bemg added to the lots along the eastern segment of Park Ridge
Boulevard (mcludmg four lots the back up to 1-95) Both commerCIal and mdustnal are bemg
added along Gateway Boulevard. The effect of thIs, If approved, would be to allow commerCIal
uses along the entire stretch of Gateway Boulevard (excludmg three BGI lots) and abuttmg 1-95
With any redistribution or redesIgnatlOn of land use WithIn the master plan, the follOWIng local
Issues are evaluated.
Does the redistributionlredeslgnatlon of land use result m a change m concept for
the Quantum Park of Commerce or the abIlity of the Park to develop in a quality
manner?
2.
What unpact will the land use redlstributionlredesignation have on projected
expenditures which wIll be spent Within the region?
.
3 Does the impact of the land use redistributionlredesignation result in a COnflICt
with the number, type and payroll level of jobs projected m Quantum Park's
Application for Development Approval (ADA)?
4 What unpact will the land use redistributionlredesignation have on adjacent
property?
5 Will there be an mcrease m traffic resulting from the land use
redistributionlredesignation?
RegardiDa iIIaI .. above, last summer, the applicant submitted a master plan amendment/DRl
amend'1lelllt telllow, among other things, the option of commercial on alll-9S abutting lots,
most of .. .... side of the eastern segment of Park Ridge Boulevard, as well as along the
GateWay .~ _ ~d corridor east of Quantum Lakes Drive. As a condition of approval, the
applicant was requiIed by the Commission to not only limit the total acres of commercial, but
designate the exact location of those 47 acres. This was in response to the following concerns
which city statfbelieve apply to the subject request as well.
a. The "option" of commercial on such a large number of lots defeats the purpose of
master planning and will lead to spotty locating of commercial uses with no
consideration of adjacent uses.
b. Commercial uses, which draw customers, pedestrians and vehicles, haphazardly
mixed with industrial uses, which require greater tractor trailer traffic, is
potentially unsafe and is not recommended by transportation planners.
c. Adding the option of commercIal use on lots along Gateway Boulevard and High
Ridge Road and along the railroad tracks and 1-95 will impact the type of
commercial ventures interested in locating in Quantum Park. This shift will attract
commercial uses such u service stations, fast food restaurants, oil cbanae garages,
and strip commercial that will be interested in the 1-95 visibility and capturing
external project traffic, with little rehwon to the planned industrial park.
d. In the vicmity of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road, west of
Congress Avenue alone, there is already 500,000 square feet of commercial square
4
Page 5
Memorandum No. 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-00 liD RIA 97-001
footage approved. unbuIlt and vested Since 1990 These approvals, as well as the
Visions 20/20 commercial revttal1zatlon efforts planned for Federal Highway, WIll
be competmg Wlth the pnme VISIbIlIty, hIgh traffic commercial lots proposed In
Quantum Park, due to the type of commercial uses that Wll1 now be Interested In
locatmg In Quantum Park. Smce the demand for commerCIal land use LS firute,
some eXisting commercial uses WIthIn the City may mIgrate to Quantum Park.
e. Strip commercial and the types of commercial uses that will be Interested In locating
close to the 1-95 interchange wIll lead to re-subdivisIon of the maJonty of the
proposed commercIal parcels along Gateway Boulevard Into smaller parcels and the
creatIon of outbwldings, whIch WIll Increase the appearance of more commercial
use m the PID This is because, although the land area would not increase, more
commercLal bwldmgs would result Since the types of commercIal referenced reqwre_
smaller parcels than IS currently platted along Gateway Boulevard. Also, there
would be the potential for stacking of buildings and signage; all competing for
visibilIty and access to remam VIable; factors less important for office and
manufacturing uses.
f. As stated in the zoning code, "The purpose of the PID district is to provide a zoomg
classification for hght industrial development that will better satisfy current
demands for light industrial zoned lands by encouraging development which Wll1
reflect chan~es in the technolo~ of land developnent and relate the development of
land to the specific site and to conserve natural amenities." The increased option of
commercial space causes a shift in the image of the PID, especially as viewed from
the 1-95 interehange; one of the major gateways to the city This shift has no
connection to any change in industrial technology and the demand for industrial
land. Rather than creating unique opportunities for development not provided
elsewhere in the city, the shift competes wia other areas of the city
g. It ... been argued by the applicant that the city can control undesirable commercial
_ through the use approval process. The use approval process is the method
ctm.l for a PID to establish uses pennitted for a specific PID district, rather than
establish in the zoning code a rigid list of permitted uses. This method was devised
for flexibility and to keep up with technology as new uses ate created in the
marketplace. However, to allow blanket approval of commen:ial, without
considering locatioual impacts, defeats the purpose of master plannil'l8 and weakens
the CIty'S ability to deny a specific commercial use at the time of use approval if a
parcel bas already been designated for commercial use.
h. The proposed commmial option of all the lots south of Gateway Boulevard that
back up to the railroad tracks and 1-95 will encourage further conflicts with the PI0
peripheral greenbelt required to be mstalled along the railroad tracks and the
approved Quantum Park sign program. This is due to the desire of these uses, more
so than other uses, to have unobstructed visibility of buildings, signage and exterior
storage and display areas from 1-95, examples of which can be seen within other
cities along 1-9S This was the reason tIult the maiority of the oommercia1lot~ are
located intemally to the park on the approved master plan.
1. Over the past two years, there has been increasing interest in loc.ftW8 manufacturing
uses within Quantum Park. In recognition of the cityYs need to attract research and
development and light mdustrial uses to dIVersIfy Its economic base, the CIty
aggreSSIVely pursued BGI to locate m Quantum Parle. The city also Identified
economic development as one of Its viSIoning goals. Towards that end an economic
/""
~
~
"WI'
Page 6
Memorandum No. 97-213
Quantum. MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
...aggR!SSlvel) putSUed BGlto locatc-...J.n 01lannl"l Park. The elf;')' aliQ Idcnufied
econormc-devetopmentasonec,.fm "Islomng goab. Towards that end an econonuc
development dIrector was lured last September and an econonuc incentIve program
for Quantwn Park was adopted applicable to developments bnngmg In a certain
nwnber of jobs. The Jobs however, also needed to pay a certaIn nummwn salary
Also, as one of the CIty'S recently adopted "quick victory" VlSlOnIng proJects, a
fonnal marketIng program Will be developed WithIn 90 days to further promote
Quantum Park as an mdustnal park.
As a point of interest, Boca Raton IS currently processing a DR! for the vacant IBM
buildmg and 500 acres In the VICInIty for a 5 million square foot bght industnal
park! This action signals further competItion, and also indicates a strong market at
tlus time for light Industnal uses.
Regarding Issue two above, it is anticipated that the proposed master plan changes will have no
effect on the projected expenditures wtuch Will be spent within the region. Regarding issue three
above, It is believed that the proposed master plan changes will have an effect on the number, type"
and payroll level of jobs projected m Quantum Park's origmal application for Development
Approval (ADA). This is because allowing the option of commercial on lots with high VIsibIlIty,
and high pass-by traffic will encourage development of these lots as commercial over mdustnal.
The pay range for service sector jobs IS smaller and industrial acreage provides a greater number of
Jobs than commercial acreage. Jobs salaries are, in turn, linked to home pnces. Attracting lugher
priced residential developments was also a Visions 20120 objective.
Regarding issue 4 (impact on adjacent property), there is a concern with locating industrial uses
adjacent to the Dos Lagos PUD. This is based on the experience the city bas had with complamts
from the residents south of Quantum Park regarding truck, radio and voice noise and early hours of
operation of the iDdusIrial uses along the south border of the Park and as far away as the Publix
DistribuDoa C 1 r~ I . The bu1fering proposed WIll only provide visual, and not auditory, InltIgation
due to the 'IIL ~ iDcompatibility of these uses.
RegardiDa... 5 (1raftic), the city does not have a traffic engineer or traffic planner on board and
does not budaet for outside review of subInltted traffic studies, therefore the city must rely on the
regional pJanning council's (RPC) review of Quantum Park's traffic study Exhibit "0" contains
the RPC's comments on the study It also contains FOOT's traffic comments (on state roads only)
and the project traffic engineer's response to the RPC's comments. The RPC, nor Palm Beach
County, bad sufficient time to review the traffic engineer's response prior to the writing of this
report. Therefore, traffic concerns will have to be resolved prior to CommillSion approval of tins
request. As a pomt of mformation, staff has also asked the RPC to make a recommendation
regarding the timing of the widenin& of Gateway Boulevard. The development order indicates that
this was to be done by the end of 1994 Since build out of the project bas occurred more slowly
than expected, this timeframe needs to be adjusted accordingly
,
In addition to the redesignation of lots for greater flexibility, Quantum Park Boulevard is proposed
to be severed. This would allow consolidation of lots in this area for development by ODe industrial
user. Although this will require a future abandonment application to be ~sed. it v.= included
at this time because it is a regional issue and potentially impacts the ORI's road system due to
redistribution of trips. Staff concerns from Engineering, Recreation amd Parks, Utilities and Fire
Departments regarding this severing are included in Exhibit up" - ConditioDS of Approval.
c
Page 7
Memorandum No 97-213
Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001
RECOMMENDATION
To address the conflIcts staff has raIsed \\'lth tlus request's Impact on the CIty'S ObjectIve of
actIvely promotmg Quantum Park as an mdustnal park, staff recommends the land use desIgnatIon
changes Illustrated on ExhibIt "E" These changes mclude the followmg:
deletIon of mdustnal on lots 3 and 22-31,
2 addItIOn ofmdustnal on lots 12-14,
3 deletIOn of commercIal on lots 17-19,21,39, 52, 56, 57, 72, 70, 69, 73A, 73B, 74, 75,
83-85, 68A and 68B,
4 deletIon of commercIal, but retammg hotel use on lots 66, 67 A and 67C,
5 addItion of office to lots 32,33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38
Pursuant to Flonda Statutes, Chapter 380 06( 19) Substantial DeVIations, the submitted
amendment IS conSIdered to be an (e )(3) type change (a change not specifically classIfied
elsewhere under state law). Under (e)(3) changes, the applIcant must prOVIde "clear and
convmcmg eVIdence" supportmg that Ius requested changes do not constitute a subStantIal
deVIation. The only aspect of this request that might possibly constitute a substantIal deVIatIon is
the redistribution of traffic caused by the large flexibIlity of land use allocation m the proJect.
Therefore, staff recommends approval of tlus request, subject to staff comments in Exhibit "F" -
Conditions of Approval, which must be addressed prior to adoptIon of the orcl.inance amending
the developmeDt order Staff further recommends that the COII1IIllSSIOn detemune that tlus
applIcation <:to. not constitute a substantial master plan change pursuant to local codes and does
not constitute a substantial deviation under state law
TJH dim
Attachments
xc. ApplicantlCentral File
S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\MPMD\staffrepon.doc
1
,.,.
'W
EXHIBIT "A"
.
?
PRUJbC'I' 'l'l'l'LE
u!::::ieRIP'llluN
'l'~ PI:.
DA'l'E REC' D
TP~CKl' Lu~ - BITE PLAN REVIEW ~(
~ pa;J~u
II'f'l'AL
NEW SITE PLAN
AMOUNT
MAJUR ~ITE
FILE NU IJrf(11 () 11--001
PR I 11 1-;J () )
PLAN MODIFICATIuN
RI:.<..:BIPT Nu
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
TWELVE (12) ::iET~ ~UBMITTED
CuLURED ELEVATIuNS RECID
(Plans shall be pre-assembled The Planning & Zoning Dept will number each
sheet of their set The Planniqg Dept set will be ul3ed to check the
remaining sets to e~sure the number and type of sheets match )
* * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPLICATION << SUB~ITTAL
DATE
ACCEPTED
DENIED
DATE
DATE uF LETTER Tu APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMIS::iION DEFICIENCIES
2nd SUBMIT'I'AL
ACCEPTED
DENIED
DATE
DATE
DATE UF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER
REVIEWER'::) NAME
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * r
I
(Label TRC uepartments on each set of plans)
DATE AND MEMU NUMBER OF MEMU ::)ENT TO TRC Tu PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW
DATE SEN'l' .3{.uJ RETURN DATE 4-!~ 1/ MEMO NUMBER Q7, (( t.
~j'~V
1st REVIEW COMMENT::) RECEIVED
PLAN::) MEMO # I DA'l:E./ "C" PLAN::i MEMO # / DATE 1 II e"
~ util 9'109'~ I~ i~ Planning / If/J<J I-
. p W 'I ~ 1 oC-7 / / c- Building Q'1 tJt/1 I Iv
Parks '!.;f~,?:- /.~l C--- Engineer I 1-
Fire r:; ,-.i3:l.. I I C-- Engineer crl- f.2j I l(-fJ. /-
Police Y cl1,OOi!.C 1 d L/ 1 C/ forester Y I I~
fY P E. Ut' VARIANCE. (::i) DATE UF MEETINU
DATE OF LETTI:.R SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENT::)
(Aesthetic Review App I dates of board mtgs <<checklist sent out w/ commenLS
NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID
DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIE~
(Must be assembled Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents)
COLORED ELEVATIONS REC 10
MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PBRFORM 2nd REVIEW.
DATE SENT MEMO #
RETURN DATE
2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL
PLANS MEMO It / DATE I"R/D" PLANS MEMO It I DATE I"R/D"
Util j I Planning I /
P W j I Building / I
Parks I I Engineer / /
Fire I I Engineer I I
Police / / Forster / I
LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT ~IGN~
PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS IN~TALLED
SCP-SDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD
CC/CRA
DA'l'Ji; API'ROVAL LE'l'TER SENT
A 'l'RAeKING ::if>
FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION
Memorandum No. 97-232
rn@rno
\,0 f7 \ "-
\" ~ \
rn
APR
A~'
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPT.
TO Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning & Zoning Department
FROM William D Cavanaugh, FPO I /l1//() (ftb[ at u:t-tA.-l <-
Fire Department /?'{/ 'f! I
DATE April 4, 1997
SUBJECT Quantum Park PID
Gateway Blvd & High Ridge Rd.
We find we cannot accept this request at this time We especially take exception to the
proposed vacating of Quantum Blvd Without any alternate routes proposed We feel
that without the input of park tenants and neighbors, we would do a disservice to the
citizens of Boynton to go further Experience with responses on Gateway Blvd, at
peak hours, indicates to us that more In depth information is needed before we offer
comment.
CC Deputy Chief Gale
FPO II Campbell
File
~, <s '-J 'I/I? /"'7
I fL.4- /...; u;;: I '
I
Ad U -+ f7+J /Vi
/1'/4 Sl>^-. fit/?' LtJ4'L1<u~.5 '<?~cyJi.k~ ') #.:C:"J C'<:>V'-"I/\ '
A L" --- O. ~I ,,(. 61-' ~ /ilVo ~'/.6.(':! tJl)h~.:. ~ /J/U),IY'ltlL
/-1-11' ;L.1.J' T'''''.IVL, ,. rV'
/l1k'x rl.s
/ P_ . dA.--/)cn=---.:::> /)Lrc.~..A/A'ft': ~k: e..~L///'_?
I , I'-<J;(I () i.., V 1.1<--
(~ / 77Z j? r 11" rJ-'-.'::;- .s,. t ,hJ))~
rA A I j ;- c ~ C/I.>t'v-r- ~ rv F /V 0f,AJI)~, I I ~
q;) r ,d' /rt>f"J.L5.::> v1<..
/f""; / /V .::.Jv /J ~=- l'l A-r: (C ,
c;l~~:r' . . .V: /f\ 'ooV., /! (~
f~ ,4/1/."1 C UJf/.V6 v Lj/vAV'
(~J> IN/) Cf).~ 'rOr~L tpfP tl)JNI
^.,/tC-iAn/"'l~~T t/{
vv rr..; (.v ,IZ./...Af-,vT 1-"~ v l.. 7' '"
17J..... <. r-t h. i! C r
J..
:s
Ir/
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO'
FILE
T AMBRI HEYDEN,
PLANNING & ZONING
DIRECTOR
FROM. SGT MARLON HARRIS
POLICE DEPARTMENT
DATE
24 MARCH 97
- L"~n\Vlrn@
PLAN ;~-'~
" MAR 7" g97 ~
r
~
~.~.".'
'~;""
QUANTUM PARK-MAS
MODIFICATION-1st RE
REFERENCES 97-0020
SUBJECT
ENCLOSURES
PlANNlf!G AND
luN \i _!EPT.
I have revIewed the above plans and have no comments.
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-129
I i (I R n
;' L'::l L ~__., :
ill A~'~~
.<
rp fS i~.
! I;
-...I
.~_.._.1
TO
Tambl Heyden, Planmg and Zomng Drrector
FROM.
Kevm John Hallahan ,Forester/ Envrronmentahst
~&~
RE.
Quantum Park-Master Plan Modification
DATE
April 2, 1997
1 The apphcant should have the approval of the Treasure Coast RegIonal Planmng Council to
make the Master Plan modIficatIons.
2. There are numerous natural resource areas on the Quantum Corporate Park propertIes that
have not been properly mamtamed. These areas mclude the 40 acre Sand Pme preserve, the
Wetlands, the lakes, the mdlvlduallots mlcrosltes and roadway medlans/r.o w 's
3. The apphcant should lmtlate a comprehensIve plan to systematIcally address each ofthe above
locatIons to perform the proper mamtenance.
The above locatIOns whIch are adjacent to parcels at Quantum Park under development, should be
the first locatIons reVIewed for mamtenance mspectIon.
Carmax Sand Pme preserve
B OJ Sand Pme preserve
Hampton Inn. .Lake adjOlmng parcel
Flowers Bakery Wetlands
All projects .Roadway medlans,r.o w
The plan should contmue through the normal reVIew process.
kjh
FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION
Memorandum No. 97-232
rn @ rn n .~lLG ~\
rn
,
APR - 4~rT! ' LJ \
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPT.
TO Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning & Zoning Department
FROM William D Cavanaugh, FPO I /(//-I,fI. fa l at W0-...t ~
Fire Department /?(/' ~/ I
DATE Apnl 4, 1997
SUBJECT Quantum Park PID
Gateway Blvd & High Ridge Rd
We find we cannot accept this request at this time We especially take exception to the
proposed vacating of Quantum Blvd Without any alternate routes proposed We feel
that without the input of park tenants and neighbors, we would do a disservice to the
citizens of Boynton to go further Experience with responses on Gateway Blvd, at
peak hours, Indicates to us that more In depth information is needed before we offer
comment.
CC Deputy Chief Gale
FPO II Campbell
File
'5_ @t m 0 ~
8t~L~!'11I1T
FLANNI 1I
ZONING B
~ j I, I j
LJ
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #97-067
TO
Tambn] Heyden, Planning & Zonmg Dlrec~A:;?/
Carel FIsher, Actmg PublIc Works Dlrecto~
THRU
FROM.
Larry QUinn, SamtatIOn Superintendent
SUB]
Master Plan ModIficatIOn - Quantum Park
DATE
Apn19,1997
orks Department has no comments m reference to the Master Plan
on at Quantum Park.
"
nn
Samtauon Supenntendent
LQ/cr
t~-~-lliJLL --
i !,
APR \ 5 \S;jl ('~J
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-155 \ PLANNING Ai'll)
ZONING \)EP1.
TO
FROM
Tambri Heyden, Planing & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks superintenden~
Quantum Park
RE
Date
April 15, 1997
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the land development order for the
Quantum Park project. The following comment is submitted
There is an indication that a portion of Quantum Blvd will be blocked off eliminating the
western portion of the loop road This will impact the proposed Quantum City Park.
The master plan for this park includes an entrance way and parking on the south
portion of the park. Due to the awkward shape of this property, parking for some of the
playing fields in park is located near the southern entrance Since the shape of the
property also does not allow for a through road to Miner Road, closing off a portion of
Quantum Blvd will cause visitors to the park to decide in advance which fields they are
going the utilize People coming from the west who are planing to use the south
playing fields will be forced to drive out of their way to get to that field
JW
CC Charles C Frederick, Recreation and Park Director
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO 97-069
~ .~
'00 L
APR t 5 1997
Wi
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
April 14, 1997
TO
I
Tambn J Heyden, Plannmg & Zomng Drrec~~
Al Newbold, Actmg DIrector OfDevelopm11
QUANTUM PARK - MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
REVIEW COMMENTS
FROM.
RE
In response to your request for Development Department comments on the above referenced
Issue, please be advIsed of the followmg:
Buildmg DIVISIon
Assummg that the proposed zomng modIficatlons do not produce a negatIve unpact to
concurrency Issues concomItant to the ongmal DRI parameters, thIS request appears to be m the
best mterest ofmarketmg and developmg the remamder of the project for all partIes concerned. It
should be noted however, that the traffic study as publIshed does not "appear" to address the
planned school sIte development and ItS' Impact to the resultmg traffic scenano at peak tImes.
AO.KH/ck
attachment: Bldg. DlV Plans
xc Anthony OcchlUzzo
Ken Hall
C:\\1y Documents\quantumparkmpmod.doc
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT NO 97 - 092
~........_~,.... -~.
\ 00 r~ @ I~." j~'"
110 ~ b ~ u j ~itii
il APR I 51991 Ill:
. :JL:).
PLANNING AND I
ZONING DEPT.
TO.
Tambri Heyden, Planning Dir~ \. /
John A Guidry. Utilities Director ~ CUi
April 14, 1997
FROM.
DATE.
SUBJECT
Quantum Park - DR! Amendment
We offer the following comments on the proposed DR! amendment for Quantum Park,
including the requests for Master Plan land use designations, and the request for vacatmg
portions of Quantum Boulevard so as to allow reconfiguration of parcels 6-11 and 22-31
1) The analysis submitted by Knnley Horn regarding the water and sewer nnpacts of proposed
land use changes assumed a rather low intensity water and sewer usage for the commercial land
use category Whereas this may have been a reasonable assumption for the Carmax SIte which
was under consideration at that time the analysis was submItted, the numbers used would be
much too low for more intensive uses such as restaurants The antIcipated usage for Industrial
sites is also rather low, and is based upon occupancy by a warehouse-type usage, and makes no
allowance for a high intensity water user (such as BGI)
The analysis submitted to date only included those proposed changes along Park Ridge
Boulevard A similar analysis. but with appropriately revised flow figures. will be required for
the all affected lots. Sewer flows must be grouped by the lift station service area. so that we
can determine if a lift station upgrade will be required.
The adoption of a more generic type of land use designation, while increasmg the flexibility of
marketing the park, may also establish conflicting impacts in close proXimIty (such as office
uses sandwiched between two mdustrial facilities) The original concept of this park was to
allocate each related usage to a dIstmct area. ThIS type of genenc designation also will reqUIre
a more intensive review of each site plan so as to determine the actual impacts on the water and
sewer systems, and evaluate those impacts against actual capacity m the delivery systems Staff
will be required to track the demand of each parcel, so as to determine when system capacity IS
reached With the original plan, adequate capaCIty factors were designed mto the system.
Those factors will likely be exceeded with the implementation of widespread commercial land
use
Any upgrades required to the water and sewer systems due to this intensification of land use
must be performed at the applicant's expense (Sec 26-28)
2) The portion of Quantum Boulevard for which the applIcant is requesting abandomnent
contains water and sewer mam lInes that cannot be abandoned. The water main is part of an
integral looped system serving all of the facilities on Quantum Blvd., and its dIsruption would
reduce fire flow capability The gravity sewer also serves eXIsting businesses We would
require, at a minimum, that an easement be dedicated over the entire right-of-way so as to
assure continued access and maintenance to our system. Once the lots are reconfigured, an
alternate system can be designed and constructed by the applIcant, after our approval, so as to
maintain uninterrupted service to the area.
Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella of this office
JAG/PVM
xc Skip Milor
File
April 14, 1997
l,rfDI ~ @ ~" n \1 -~ rnI
I ~~ 11111
'1 ni" II
,JU APR r 6 !q97 j ~I
1 PLANNING AND
L ZONING DEPI
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO 97-069
TO
Tambn J Heyden, Planmng & Zomng DIrector
FROM.
Al Newbold, Actmg DIrector of Development
RE
QUANTUM PARK - MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
REVIEW COMMENTS
In response to your request for Development Department comments on the above referenced Issue, please
be adVIsed of the followmg:
Buildmg DIVISIon
Assummg that the proposed zomng modIficatIons do not produce a negatIve Impact to concurrency Issues
concomItant to the ongmal DRI parameters, thIS request appears to be m the best mterest of marketmg and
developmg the remamder of the project for all partIes concerned. It should be noted however, that the
traffic study as pubhshed does not "appear" to address the planned school sIte development and ItS' unpact
to the resultmg traffic scenano at peak: tunes.
Engmeenng DIvISIon
The rezomng of the lots abuttmg the E-4 canal from an office deSIgnatIon to hght mdustnal may well
unpact the welfare of the resIdentIal communItles on the west SIde of the canal. Future vacatIng of the
subject portIon of Quantum Blvd. will also reduce emergency response tImes.
The future vacatmg and closmg of Quantum Blvd. per the apphcant's request will create a dead-end road
from Gateway Blvd. some 2500 feet long. The maXImum allowable length of a dead-end street IS 1320
feet per Chapter 6 of the LDR (page 6-11 )
RecommendatIons.
1 ConsIder any rezonmg request and/or land consohdanon when there IS a bonafide contract purchaser, or
2. Approve the request forrezomng and future vacatmg of the subject portIOn of Quantum Blvd. subject
to Quantum deedmg Lot 31 to the CIty for park purposes and the relocanng and constructIOn of
Quantum Blvd. northward along the E-4 canal to mtersect Mmer Road, mcludmg buffenng along the
canal. ThIS prOVIdes not only an effiCIent access to the park and Gateway Blvd., but also faster
emergency response tIme.
3 ReVIse note 5 as shown on the attached plan.
AO.KH/ck
attachment: Bldg. DIV Plans
xc Anthony OcchlUzzo
Ken Hall
C:\My Documents\quantumparkmpmod.doc
j~
~.88
rrofIT ~ u ~ ~
\L~ APR 2 11991 ~
Pli\NNING i\ND
ZONING DEPT.
Board of Supervisors
C. Stanley Weaver
Kermit Dell
John I. Witworth III
Secretary/Manager
William G. Winters
Assistant Manager
Ronald L. Crone
Attorney
Perry & Schone, P.A.
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
~~~J
13081 MILITARY TRAIL
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33484
Apn117, 1997
Tambn J Heyden, AICP
Duector of Planning and Zomng
City of Boynton Beach
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, Flonda 33425-0310
Dear Ms. Heyden.
Subject.
Technical RevIew Committee Agenda - Apn115, 1997
The Lake Worth Dramage DIstnct offers the followmg comments regardmg the Item(s)
on the meetmg agenda.
1 Quantum Park - No ObjectIOn to Amendment Request.
2 Amerope Enterpnses, Inc. at High Ridge Commerce Park PID - at 45 mIles East
of High RIdge Road, thIS project wIll not be located m the L WDD Service Area.
As always, we thank you for bemg gIven the OppOrtunIty to comment.
Smcerely,
LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
~~M
Shaughn J Webb
ChIef Inspector
SJW"]ma
c Ronald L Crone, P.E., P.L S , AssIstant Manager, LWDD
Patnck A. Martm, P.E., DIstnct Engmeer, LWDD
K:\DATAIJOANN\WPDOCSIHEYDEN SIW
Delray Beach & Boca Raton (561) 498-5363. Boynton Beach & West Palm Beach (561) 737-3835 . Fax (561) 495-9694
Traffic AnalysIs
Quantum Park
Master Plan Amendment
No.8
Prepared for
Quantum ASSOcIates
Prepared by
KImley-Hom and AssOcIates, Inc
March, 1997
o Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 1997
049029.01
Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc.
Quantum Park Traffic Analysis
Master Plan Amendment No.8
TABLE OF CONTENTS
~
INTRODUCTION
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
1
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
12
CONCLUSIONS
12
Table of Contents
04909201 \wp\mpa-8m.toc
March 12, 1997
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Quantum Park Traffic Analysis
Master Plan Amendment No.8
INTRODUCTION
This report is provided in support of Quantum Park Master Plan Amendment Number 8 The
Quantum Park DRI is a mixed use office/industrial/commercial development. Currently (Master
Plan Amendment #7) there are specific limits on acres and square footage of various land uses.
These limits are listed below'
Industrial maximum square feet:
Office maximum square feet:
Commercial maximum acres:
Commercial maximum square feet:
Hotel = 268 square feet commercial
2,784,354
1,685,772
47
426,888
These maximums are to be maintained. However, land use designations on selected parcels are
being changed to accommodate flexibility without the need to process unnecessary NOPCs. This
study examines the effects that the Master Plan Amendment will have on traffic within the
development and documents that the proposed changes will generate no additional traffic and will
have no significant effect on traffic impacts.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
ACCESS
Master Plan Amendment No.8 allows for Quantum Boulevard to be vacated in conjunction with
reconfiguration of adjacent lots 6 through 11 and 22 through 31 The vacation of Quantum
Boulevard would not change the access for these parcels since they could still connect to both ends
of the remaining roadway Parcels 2,3,4 and 5 would be fully served by Quantum Boulevard to
Congress Avenue. The affect would be to increase traffic from these parcels on this roadway link.
h:\04902901\wpVnp~.m13
1 -
March 12, 1997
Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc.
Quantum Park Traffic Analysis
Master Plan Amendment No.8
The second group of parcels served by Quantum Boulevard, Parcels 12 - 17 and 32 - 38 would
already primarily use Gateway Boulevard. A small amount of travel from parcels 12 - 15 and 32 -
35 would have accessed Congress Avenue via Quantum Boulevard. This traffic would no longer
use the subject link. Thus, the increase to the west from Parcels 2 - 5 will be offset by the decrease
from Parcels 12 - 15 and 32 - 36. Conversely, the increase to the south on Quantum Boulevard,
from Parcels 12 - 15 and 32 - 35, will be offset by the decrease from Parcel 2 - 5 Thus, there will
be no significant change in traffic demands from the vacation of the subject section of Quantum
Boulevard
LAND USE
The proposed Master Plan Amendment Number 8 is shown in Exhibit A (located at end of report)
For purposes of this analysis, similar lot designations were grouped together as shown in Exhibit A
The lots were grouped based upon the land use change from the existing Master Plan Amendment
Number 7 to the proposed Master Plan, shown in Exhibit B (located at end of report) Table 1
identifies the changes in land use designations for the various groups from the existing Master Plan
Amendment Number 7 to the proposed Master Plan Amendment Number 8
Based on these land use changes the following conclusions can be made regarding the groupings.
The designated land use changes in Groups I, V, and VIII will not cause an increase in the
maximum number of trips from these groups as the change in potential land use does not include a
higher trip generator than was previously approved Groups VI and VII are limited by the analysis
of the intersection of Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard performed as part of Master Plan
Amendment Number 6 Ordinance No 96-33 Section 2, Condition No.4 is being modified to
require monitoring of trip thresholds for every site approval on Park Ridge Road (currently the DO
condition only applies to changes to commercial) Therefore, the only groups which could
potentially generate additional trips and impact the traffic characteristics of Quantum Park are
Groups II, III and IV
h:\04902901\wp\mpa-8.m 13
-2
March 12, 1997
Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc.
Quantum Park Traffic Analysis
Master Plan Amendment No.8
TABLE 1
LAND USE CHANGES
Group Existing Master Plan Amendment Proposed Master Plan Amendment
Number No. 7 Designation No.8 Designation
I Office Office/Industrial (01)
II Office Office/Industrial/Commercial (010
III Research & Development (R&D) Office/Industrial (01)
(to be generated as light indst.)
IV Office Office/Industrial/Commercial (010
V Office/Commercial Office/Industrial/Commercial (OIC)
VI Industrial and Office/Industrial/Commercial (010
Industrial/Commercial
VII Industrial Office/Industrial (01)
VIII Office/Hotel/Commercial Office/Industrial/Commercial (010
Group II Effects
An analysis was performed to determine the impact of the land use changes in Group II This
analysis compares the maximum potential trip generation for the proposed land use designations in
Master Plan Amendment Number 8 to trip generation for each parcel that was included as part of
the approval for Master Plan Amendment Number 6 (the trip generation was not revised as part of
Master Plan Amendment Number 7) Table 2 summarizes the trip generation from Master Plan
Amendment Number 6 and the maximum potential trip generation based on the land use
designation in Master Plan Amendment Number 8. The land use change in Master Plan
Amendment Number 8 with the greatest trip generation potential on all of the parcels in Group II is
from office to commercial
h:\04902901\vvpVnp~.m13
3-
March 12, 1997
Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc.
Quantum Park Traffic Analysis
Master Plan Amendment No.8
TABLE 2
TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS
Master Plan Amendment N ~.Master Plan Amendment No.8
Group Acreage land Use PM Peak land Use (Max) PM Peak Hou VarianCE
Number Hour Trips 1 Trips (Max) 2
II 1742 Office 246 Comm 987 741
'PM peak hour trips established as part of Master Plan Amendment Number 6.
2PM peak hour trip rate based on ITE Trip Generation Manual 5th Edition equation for land use type 820. Assumes a floor area ratio of
0.25.
Group II could cause a shift in commercial from the east portion of the property to the west portion
of the property It is noted that no changes to the master plan increase project trip generation
Therefore, a decrease in office in Group II will generate an increase in office use in the eastern part
of the project. Similarly, an increase in commercial in Group II will be accompanied by a decrease
in commercial in the east part of the project. The increase and decrease in PM peak hour trips were
distributed and assigned to Gateway Boulevard to determine the level of impact of this change.
The assignment pattern approved for Master Plan Amendment Number 6, and used herein is
shown in Table 3 Exhibit C shows the resulting potential PM peak hour impact of the change in
Group II land use.
The net result of maximizing commercial in Group II is an increase of 148 trips to the west and a
decrease of 148 trips to the east. This represents approximately a five percent change in project
traffic in each area. Such a change is too small to not impact the operations of Gateway Boulevard
It is worthy to note that this is a change to approved impacts; however, there is no change to
original project impacts since commercial was originally south of the lakes in parcels 58-61
Parcels 58 - 61 have the same assignment pattern as the Group II parcels (i.e., commercial was
moved east in Amendment Number 6) Therefore, the resulting impacts will be consistent with the
originally approved project impacts.
h:\04902901\wpVnp~.m13
4
March 12, 1997
~~
\H
'"
::: ""'"
,,::::.:::
n..~ 0- 0-
~~aa
g~~\~
o Ot:
t; t;O
-t;-t;
e- e-
:,;~
e4l.\"4I.\
he\ie
itletl
-as-as
~#.#.#.#.
- QQ&l\Q
&l\&l\-&&l\
.......,........""""'-'
(f\ .... ~ (f\\~
4!~61-&~ -
I 1 I'" I
j
il
I~
i
~
'"
==,,"""""
---
n:- - --
~~~~
e
E\\~
ooot:
t;t;t;O
.,..........--c:
e. e-
lIDlIDlIDe
41.\41.\41.\ lID
...,41.\
tltlt;e
.t;e\l
-a-;-aS
t&tt
....-t~....
",,,-,"'-'''''
Q .... -& -~Q
_al)Q~ """
~~ ...
I ... I ...
Q,~
~
"'<A
~~
A.~
~
c-:~
.'"
u
~~
-t;
_.-
-lID.
\k~ 1 ;,
t;e
.t;
\.')n~
Q
~
t-
~~
d)1:
U~~~
Ul"-
i~~~
l~Z~
\iG
t-(t
Ul
~
4.
1:
-------,.-----------------.
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Quantum Park Traffic Analysis
Master Plan Amendment No.8
TABLE 3
PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT PATTERN
(1986 AMENDMENn
LAND USE GATEWAY BLVD. HIGH RIDGE RD. GATEWAY BLVD. EAST
CORRIDOR WEST OF NORTH OF PARK OF PARK
PARK
OFFICE 41 9 50
INDUSTRIAL 39 11 50
COMMERCIAL 46 4 50
Modified assumotions for current studv:
Use average officelindustrial
40% west; 10% north
2. For commercial on High Ridge or Park Ridge Road use 65% east
and 31% west
Source: Amendment #6 Traffic Study
Groups III and IV
Table 4 shows the Trip generation analysis for areas 1\1 and IV The increases north of the
intersection of the Gateway Boulevard/High Ridge Road intersection will be off set by decreases to
the west and south of the intersection.
In order to evaluate the effect of those shifts, the previously approved analysis for the intersection of
Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road (performed for Master Plan Amendment Number 6) was
updated. Exhibit D is Table 9 from the Master Plan Amendment Number 6 analysis, that has been
marked up to demonstrate the shift in development. The following is a description of the shifts, and
the reasoning behind the shifts.
h:\04902901\wp\mpa-8.m 13
6
March 12, 1997
Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc.
Quantum Park Traffic Analysis
Master Plan Amendment No.8
TABLE 4
TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS
Master Plan Amendment Master Plan Amendment
Group Number 6 Number 8
Acreage Variance
Number land Use PM Peak Land Use PM Peak Hour
Hour Trips 1 (Max) T rips (Max) 2
R&D
III 177 173 Office 248 75
(Indust)
586
IV 11.33 Office 247 Comm 742
'PM peak hour trips established as part of Master Plan Amendment Number 6.
2PM peak hour trip rate based on ITE Trip Generation Manual 5th Edition equation for land use type 820. Assumes a floor area ratio of
0.25.
Office to Commercial
To develop the maximum potential impact on the intersection, the parcels in Group IV (83, 84, and
85) were converted from office to commercial use. Although Lot 91 was designated in Master Plan
Amendment Number 7 for Office/Hotel/Commercial use, it was generated in the analysis for Master
Plan Amendment Number 6 as office. To maximize the impact, lot 91 was generated in this
analysis as commercial The total area of the lots to the north of Gateway Boulevard which were
redesignated as commercial use for this analysis (lots 83, 84, 85, and 91) is 176 acres.
In addition to these changes, the trip generation was revised to reflect existing and committed
development in the project. Lot 1 was converted from office to commercial, to reflect a proposed
hotel that is planned for the lot. Combined these changes with the lots previously designated as
commercial, the total number of commercial acres in the development would be 639 Master Plan
Amendment Number 7 limits the total amount of commercial use in the development to 47 acres.
h:\04902901\wp\mpa-8.m 13
7
March 12, 1997
t:;
- w w
- J:
C ~ '"
... ;:)8
= 0 Ow
z'"
I- ~ ~9
w
- ~ OU
CQ ;:) wo
"'<
- -' 00
0
:c > .......
o~
>< z ...
... ....
LoU ;:)
to-
.... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~q~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~-~
~ ~M~NNN_____NN~~N~NN_________N~NMNM~O~~N~M.-----..--
.... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M
m _N~__M . . .0 "__NVtno\M_ .0 . . . . . . -M"",...,t.D.,..,M -N_MU")_MO - . . -_0 . .
~NN___~~~_~________~_~~~~~~~_____NNO_~__NN_MM~~__~M
... ~.~M~~~~~O~M~~O_~~~~O~~~~~~~~~""M~.~O~~~-M""O""""""~~-U")""
m ~~~NNN~~~N~NNN~M~~~~N~~~~~~~NMNMN~~ciN~N~~.N6ciciciN~cid
.. e~~..~MMM~M...~~""~.M.MMM~MMM~~~~U")~~O.~U")~~=~MMMMO~~M
a cicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicidcicicicicicicicidciciciciciociciciddcicicicicicidcicici~cicici
..
~
i ...
i: a
z
0
g ...
lQ ~ qC!q-f"'!~""":~
~ ----MNOO
.. ~f'W!""1,,!q~,",:~
..
z NNC""CC"'CCO\D_N
.... f"!"'!~r"1"!"!~f'!
..
... 00000000
.... "''''11\''''-.0...........
..
z ciooo":_od
..
III
...
..
z
5 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~q~~q~~~~~~~.~
0 ~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~d~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~
..
~
~ ~~~o~~~~~~~o~.~~o~o.~~.~~~~o~-~~-~~o~~~~~~~c~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~N~NNNN~~~~~~~~ci~~~~~~~~~~~~~M~
... 5 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
5 0 dddcicicicicidddcicicicicicicicicioddcidddciciddddddddcidddddoddddddd
..
...
::!:
::!:
e ~ 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
dcidddciocicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicidciciciocicicidddciciciciciciddd
,: T
~ ~ ~'llI:~~~-~~
NN",NCO,...,,-N
...
...
....
0
:z:
~
0
u
lC
S 0 ...
0 :J N
z
~
~ ~~_~OM~~~~~~O_~~~~~~~M~MMM~.N~M~~~O _~N..o\DO\
0 ~~~~~N~~~~~~~NNNMN~~~~~~~~~~NNN1~7~ NriNN""M
,."..
t;; ! ~!. *~l!~~
:>
0 -
?;
5 ::\ O_NM~~~~~~O_NM~~~~~~O_NM~~~~~~~mo~~~~~M~~~
..
.. ~ _NM~~~~~m__________NN~NNNNNNNMMMMMMM~~MMM~v~~~~~~~~
~ Z
~
Si
co
..
><
~
.;
15
~
'"
:>
~
;;
.,;
~
.9
:i:
-
.
:c IU
~
,C ... ...
0 x: '^
~ ::l~
U ... oS
- 0 Z'^
~ :S9
0 w
:l; 01.1
::l wo
'^<
- .... 00
0 .......
~ ;:. o~
Z a:
- C< ...
CIQ ::l
- ....
:r:
)(
u.I
E
~;:
z'"
o
ti
i1--
~~
~
..
X
0-
o
i .,,,.,,.,
..rr.i~
0- .'..., co
~ ~an'"
"'- -
-- "'''''''
III V;....;,...;
..
:::
..
~
--r_\DOO""'......"'t'f"'I\DCOOlt\"""
N_"';"":"':"":"":NN,,:,..."':r-i"":
..
..
z
O\U'\O'\C:OI""'\,..,Mt"'!~CJ\C"'!COM-
co,.,;ui,.;...i~..o~"ui~,.,;o\..,.;
0-
..
'^
anN ""'.....,..,.,.,..,..,It'\."rt'lICN.,,'"
ci d ci d ci ci ci ci d ci"; ci d.o
0-
..
Z
CO,...., N CO......,..,...,O It\N\DCOO\ 0
"":ci--=cici"":"':r-.i"":"":,..;d":"':
..
~
--
..
z
U'l~.....-<<!<<!~Gq
. . . ."O\l)N....
U'lU'l.........U')V\..o....
r-..t'f"'ICOr-.COQJM....
cicico""~"ONCO
NNN_V\V\\OM
~_aJOt.l\lI'lIO"
.....,.u-i....;...uir-.:
a..D '"
cidd
__U"lCOV"llnOO
__"":O";..iU;o\
~~~O_&n___O-\Dq~~.MO~~~~
~~NNN..;-~~ci5M~:,..;~~~~ge~
~~~~~".....~~O-~~~~~MO....~~~
~~~__~~~~ci~~~~~~~~~~~~
"CO."....~M.....COClOO_"O\o,....,~an~,....,".....,....,
~ddddcicidcidcd~~cidciddd~co
"OMOM~""'.....OOO_......O\O~.,,~<q'~""'N......
~.MN~~~MMci~N..;~NNcicidci~~
~O_"O......NO'\NNO~O\~~",.....O..,<q'.....~-
~,..;N..;..;...:ciM,..;ci~N~~NN~,..;~~~~
~~~_."OO~~O~~~~~~OM~N~-
~~~~~~~~~ci~e~~~~~M~~~~
5
o
~CJ\~"O"O~~~~~~\D~~~~~~~~~~~~OOO~~~~~~~~~~OO-OO~~ocoooc~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~cicio~~~~~~~~~~oci~cici~~ciddcidd~
q"",,,,,
.... . .
"'....'"
.. .... on
~N~
co~'"
.. .... ....
.nd"":
"'11nC't.
.... . .
~"'..
~"t"oI
;:;~vi
-"''''
cr\cio\
"'-~
~
~N~O_.~.~N~OC~~~~~~~q~~_ooO~~~~CN_N__CONOO~~OOOCCC~
~~MN~~M~~~~~~N~~~~~~=e~~ddd~~~~..MN~~oci~cici~~cidddcio~
ccoooococOOOOOOOOOOOOOCO~~~OOOOOOOOOOO~O~~OO~~~~~~O
ddciciciciciciciciciciciciocicicicicidciciciEE;dcidciciciciciddci~ci~~oci~e~~;~ci
__5
<0
o
0<
i
Ji
o
Vi!::
~qqqqqqqqqqqqq~~qqqqq~q~~~~qqq~~~~qqqq~~~~~~~d~~~:q
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~~~OOOOOOOOOOO~O~~OO____~NO
...:
;:
...
~
...
~
0-
o
:t:
:i.
Ji
o
V
...
Sc
Coli
~O<
~
~
o
:;;
=>
c
i!::
_N~O'\_""In"''''''''MO\NN
NN_ciN"':":',...;~_~ciN-=
--
tl
0<
<
..
~ -..
M,..)"';
., co
MM
..
..;
t
I
qOCOO\a)CO.o
U"I - - - . . .
U\t"lLl"J""<q"\o~
co..
NN
..... ........
vi ~N
oan_ChNO'\
MNooiM"'=iui
r:1I'!
"'~
l' ,
"
'-0 Ul 0\0
~""'-:N
"''''
MM
'" 00
~ MM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~""'Ul.o~~~O_NM.~m~~~~~~C'\O_N~~~an~~~Q\~_N~
...,.....,....,...,.~..,...,....,.""U"I~In~~""U"IU"IU"IU"IIn~~~~~~~~\O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CO~~~
~
.. ~
..; 0
.....
'"
0
.,.;
a-
d
'"
..;
~
..;
o
~
'"
=>
~
~
(;
.,;
~
9
:i:
~ ~ ....
...
~ ... ..- .... ....
,..; <D .... ~
'" ..-
..- <:> ..-
'" ,..; ... .,;
... .... .... ...
~ d ~ ~ '"
.... ...
0\C'~~-~f'-:."'1 <D <:> <D
... ri";""__I"'<<i.,D~ ,;, d ,;,
~ .... <:> ~ ...
..i .... '"
NO 0 ('f\O ('t'Icr:.q C! '"
..o~":'ci~~"- "'l ,;,
~ r-...~--- _,.r\r'\ .... ..-
<D ....
~ d ~ ...
...o.""'f""\<t"'\~~a-. <:> ...
~ t4'l~"';rl':'McO~ ... ci- ~
~ ..- ...
... ... ...
~ ... ~......MO'\\r\oD....t:D <:> ...
~~i;~,.;~!;t~ ...
,;, ..i ...
?~ ';: <:> <D
.... '"
5
6 '" '"
~... ci- ~
...~ ... <D
~ <D
"! "!
~ ..- ;;.
~ ...
a- '"
..- ..-
i 6 ~
<D
... ...
... .0 .0
.. ..- ..-
z ... ...
... ...
~ .0 .0
e ... ...
'" '"
..- ..-
~ ..- ;;;
<D
Z ... ...
6
... ....
oil ....
S 5 ce..t>r.n.....coort'!,c:r:'!."'1 ..i ..i
~d....:t..f..n..n('f\..,." <:> <:>
U a- a-
S. 0 "'lI'<C"t-4-.M-or-'\<S''' ... ...
0 ~
~ '0 .... ....
... ~"!...."!~"!~';; ,..; ,..;
~ <D <D
................rt\l\-- .... ...
.... ....
...5 ~~~~~~q~C! ,;, ,;,
~ ....
<0 Qo.OO'OooO'O' ';:
~ ..-
....
:f; .... ,;,
0 C!C!C!C!C!C!C!C!C! ,;,
"'~ ~ ...
00000000.0 ..-
..- ..-
ti '" '"
~ ci-
~ ...
;;I ... ....
'0 .,; .,;
:c
i ... ....
... ...
" I ... ...
e
\II ... ...
~o ~-.-:cq~::' ... ...
0" ",-":':'''-~''-I ... ...
~~
~~\~1 \ 1\'2 ..- ..-
~ .... ....
~ ~
0 t&
~ ..-
ci- a-
0 ('l GnJ ~
~ c'
::!
~~ :,~~,;;;~~~~a. ~
"
"," j.~ \ \
~~
<J
~z "
""':'
"'0
~ S
~ ...
8 ~ oil
~ ::l
0
.;;;;; 0 3
- 3:
- ~ ~
0
- 3 0
- 0 ...
'= ... ~
~ ...
c:Q ::>
- ....
~
UJ
..
'5
"'
%
.c.
"'
~
3:
~
~
b~
~~
...'"
...;~
'05
..."'
5~
"'..
~1i
-:>'5
a> ..,
a-C
o~
,.2
z!!
-\!
~~
..,-
i~
~~
'tl~
....~
ai~ ..
~~~
~~~
81::10....
-t!'"
~toI.2
..,-'!!t
~~Ct
cc:.~C
"' Cl. 0
~~~
~~~:Z
~~ ..;;
Cl. "-
"'0",,05 v ~
%~~~-;
~~~~~
~ aU""*" ,
oc~lV\
_~ft$""6J'
~~~b~
-o......CC/orQco
~~~~~
~~~::.--:.
~.!!-s.s '5
.~ _...... 0'\ (t\.
_ 0..""" V\ '^
~.~7.
_..u
E~~
~,
=====-
_N~
~
o
-" -~-~_.._~~-----------
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Quantum Park Traffic Analysis
Master Plan Amendment No.8
Therefore, 169 acres needed to be shifted from commercial to office, elsewhere in the
development. Based upon a reasonable estimate of where commercial development was most
likely to occur, lots 62, 72, 73B, 74, and 81 were converted from commercial to office to
compensate for this shift.
Industrial To Office
To further develop the maximum potential impact in the intersection, the parcels in Group III (86,
87, 88, 89B and 90B) were converted from industrial to office. Through discussions with the
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, it was determined that R&D should be treated as
industrial for trip generation purposes.
Other Changes
In addition to the changes in Groups III and IV, the following changes were also made. The noted
change to office from industrial is offset by the proposed industrial development planned on lots
32,33, 34A, 35, 36, 37, and 38. These lots were previously analyzed as office. Lots 89A and
90A were converted from R&D to industrial to reflect existing development, and lots 68A and 68B
were converted from R&D to industrial as agreed upon previously
As part of Master Plan Amendment Number 7, it was decided that the designation "hotel" should
be treated as commercial from a trip generation standpoint. The remaining two lots that had been
previously generated as hotel were 65A, and 65B These lots however could not be changed to
commercial for the purposes of this analysis, as all the commercial acreage had been used
Therefore, the next highest potential traffic generator allowable on the sites (office) was used To
compensate for this increase in office on lots 65A and 65B, lots 39 and 40A were changed from
office to industrial
h:\04902901\wp\mpa-8.m 13
11
March 12, 1997
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Quantum Park T raffle Analysis
Master Plan Amendment No.8
Lot 40 which was previously designated as office was actually split into two lots, 40A which
became industrial, and 40 which was changed to institutional to reflect proposed development.
Lots 41 A, 53, and 54 were also changed to institutional from their previous designation as R&D to
reflect this proposed development. The resulting trip generation of these shifts in land use can be
seen in Exhibit E Exhibit E is the same spreadsheet as previously approved for Amendment
Number 6. The noted land use changes were made for each parcel and the commercial trips were
held to the previous analysis level since no increase in commercial square footage is proposed
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
Based on the turning movement volumes determined in Exhibit E, an analysis was performed to
determine if the intersection will operate at an acceptable level of service at full build out with
required improvements. The analysis is attached as Exhibit F and demonstrates that the
intersection will operate at an acceptable Level-Of-Service "D"
CONCLUSIONS
It is concluded that the proposed land use and access flexibility will have no significant effect on
traffic impacts from Quantum Park. Further, improvements imposed at the intersection of Park
Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard will continue to provide a good level of service even with a
maximum shift in commercial and office development to north of the intersection
-12 -
March 12, 1997
h:\04902901\wp\mpa-8.m 13
..
~
..
lB
....
lB
"'
..
II>
"'
~
'"
z
"'
~o:
Z II>
0
g
lQ....
i ~
"'
..
z
..
el
..
..
z
"'
- lB
-
U.I tu
-
- '" '" ....
::E: ..
~ '" z
~ ::l~
'" oS
- 0 z'"
= ~ :59 5
'" OU
- " 0
:I: ::l "'0 "'
"'<
.... 00 ~
0
>< > L", 0
o~
z '"
U.I '" L ~
::l
....
....5
~o
"'
~
0
u~
~
~~MO~~~~~~.O_~~~~.O~~.~....~M-.N~N~O. ~~ .~....~~N_ ~
t;;"';~NNN . . . "_NNNNNMNN"':' .____....:N,..;NMN~<o:tc::iN.NN~N 'N---"':-.i~- 0
~ .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~O~~M~~mM~~~~~~~~
~~~-~~m~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~d~~m~~~~~"';"';"';"';~~N
~.~M.~~~~O~M.~o_m~Mmo~m~~~~~~~~.o-.o~omNONMN~~~~.-~
...NNM"':"':"':M"':NNN,..;M"';NN"':r.i . O"':"':"':"':"':NMNNr-.iroiroio "roi"':NM"': " "ocioor-.ir-.ici
~=~~~~MMM~~~~~~~~~~~~~MMM~~M~~~~~~~O~=~~=~M~M~MMO=~
~cicicicicidocicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicidcicicicidcicicicicidci~dci
OOO-~=~
" . . _ roi N ci
M~~I.OOO\~
NNNNcO..c
~~~~I.OI.O
dcicic:ic::idc:i
~U"'Iananl.O"M
dddd "_d
o .~~~~~~~~~~~~~q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~q~~~~~~~~~~~
c:i;~~~~~~~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M~c:i~g~~g~~ ~~~~cO
O=~O~~~~~I.O~ON~M~O~O~I.O~.~~~~OI.O-~M~~OO~-O~-=~====~~~1.O
ci~~~~.MMMMr-.i~~~~~~~~MroiNMNNNNM.~~~~~~c:i~a:)~~~~M~~~~~~!"';
'"'
~q~qq~~~~~qqqqqqqqqqqq~qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
~oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
'"'
~qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
~oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
..:
~
~
....
6
:J:
:i. '"
:E
8 ,.;
."
~Q
~=
~
...
~
~
....
...
~<w:t..,.<w:t"""N-=
NNNNNcOf'o... "
~_O\OMI.OI.OI.O~M~O_U"'I~MMO\I.O~MI.OMMM~~NO\M
roi~"':NN " " . " . "NNNN"';N"':"':"':"':"':"':"':~"':-NNN
...
"
~
o
>
z
'"
::J
~
;;
'"
~
...
9
i
co~~o \ONI.O...o ~
NNroi~ N"';NNroi
....
tJ
"'
~
_NM~U"'II.O~COO\O-N~.U"'I~~~~O-NM~~~~CO~O NM~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~MV~
__________NNNNNNNNNNMMMM~MMMMMMM~~.~~~~....,.
"'
el
"'
~
~
;;)....
.. ..
z '"
0
6
ill ....
~ ~
~
"'
..
z
..
..
'"
...-.. ..
""C ..
z
-
......
c "'
0 lB
U ....
- '"
'" '" ....
::E: ..
- ~ '" z
- ::l~
U.I '" oS
- 0 z'"
- ~ :59
~ '" OU 5
" 0
::l "'0 "'
- "'<
.... 00 ~
= 0
> L", ..
o~ 0
- z '"
:I: '" L ~
::l
....
><
U.I ..
....;;)
:s 0
u
"'
~
::11
0
u~
i
....
..
lB
....,
...;
....
lB
"
c::i
....,
c::i
O"l.......-"'O 0 O.....................M"OCOQ In.
ON- . . . . .NN~~..:N-
NO\tnO\aoMf"l"'lMt"'!"'ItO\~COM-
NoOMv\MMIoCi~~.......uoi~Ma;ui
NLnNMNNMMtnI.l'lMON&nM
cicicic:ic:ic::idcic:icici-=c:icici
...CC.......NCO.......MMOtnN\OCCO'lO
c:i .O....:c:ic:i...:...:N....:...:fI"10...: .
'" ""<l
-.iMM
~t'4N
'" . .
","''''
"'..,..,
u-i"": .
I.I')"'N_M~~O
. . . . . 0\ "'It .
I.Illn..........M"lI'lnM
.......M"ONU"'l"'ltN.......
cicicitticca\~1.!:i
NN"'It__"'If'tn_
O.......OMM
~.cciMfI"1-.i.q:M
"'..,..,
cicici
__...CC.......OM\C
___oci-.:;.ci
...
~
S
o
U"'ICO"'OO-........ _oCO\C...CO.....MO...~...~
NMNNNN...:~.ciuiM_NMMOO~~O~~
~~~~~O\M~~O~~CC .~~MO""~~~
~~~~~cc~~~ci~~~"'ONNOO~~~~~
U"'ICOU"'i.......tnMCOCOON.......M..o..............tn..................O"lU"'l
ciciddcicicicicici"':cicicicicicicicicici~
O"lMOM...COMOOO"'O......."ONLnlnl.l'l.................Oln
N.MNN"':"':MMO..DN'MNNOc:iciciui"
OO_"O.......O\...NNO"'OO\-M..............OM...NU"'I~
NMN . . ._MMc:i~N_NNN.Mu-iuiM~
~~~_tn__~~O~~N~~~OM...N~~
-~~a\m.......u-i~~ci~~..D~~~.Mu-iu-i~~
~~O\~...o..o~~~~~~..o~~~~~~~~~~-~qoo~~~~~~~~~~o~-~~~~oooo~o
~..D~~..D~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~cici~~~~~~~~~gci~~~~~~cicioci~ci
q.1.n
" . .
",""''''
...."'"
~N"':
"'~'"
...."....,
u-ici"':
f'I1U"'lO'\
" . .
~"'....
"'!.......N
~N..n
~"''''
a\Oa\
"'~~
~.......NNO_...~N.......OO.......~U"'lI.n~=~q~f'I1_I.nOOO'\_~MON.......~_ O~N"""''''''''~~OOooO'\o
~..,:NMNNM~u-i..,:MmN..nN~~~~~~~~~~~cici~u-i~~..,:..,:..,:M~~o~~Nu-i~~cicioo~o
OOOOOOOCOOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOO~:COOCOOOOOOOOOOOOO~~~~O~
oocicicioociciocicicidcicidciciddociddd~~dddciocicicidocicicicicicici~~~~ci~
OCOOOCCCOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOOOO~:OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~~~~O~
ocicicidcicicicicidcicicicicicicicidcicicicicici~~cicidcicicidcicicicicicicicicici~O~~ci~
...:
~ ..,
~ N
....
~
..
0
x
~
::11
0
u
;
;;) Q
~ ~
~
~
0
-N~O'\ LOlO........~MO'\NN
NN_c:iN...:....:N~_~ciN .
....
u
"'
:
..,..,
MM
....
-i
co
~ M
~....
MM
OtO_O"I 0"1
MN"':M u-i
qo~O'\~
to . . " .
Lt"'IMI.n~~
'"
...;
co.~Lt"'lO"IO
NNMN"':N
~ M.......
Lt"'I "N
'"
-i
...
""
~
o
>
z
'"
~
o
'"
~
...
5'
I
"'''''''
N"":MM
00
t"'it"'i
'"
...;
ffi~~~~~~~~O'\~~~~~NM~~~~~~O_NM~~~~~~~~~~O-N~~~~~~~~~-N
..~~~~~.~~Lt"'lLt"'lI.nI.nI.nLt"'lLt"'lLt"'lLt"'lLt"'lLOLOI.n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"""'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''cococo
will
=== <-' o. <-'
~~ ~ - ...;
~ .... 0
oD'" '"
oD'" .. - <-'
oD 0 oD
... ..;
i <1''''' .j, <-' ;;.
..o~ '" '"
oD'" '" - ....
.,DcO~...c....c.".~~~ '" 0 '"
.... "."!~...-i....-,,,""-:t ,...: 0 ,...:
CO .... 0
III "," <-' - ..
J:)"t""\co~--"'.~ .... C< ....
.. ..",~~i~.j,i~s::t ...; - -i
.... -;:. '"
" ~. <-' ..
"'\l'\.tf\OM.t"f'l~ <:> <:> <:>
i o...;.,;...;...-io...-i .j, ~ .,;
...... ~ ~ '" CO
<-' <-' ..
\a ..:$'.........."".s:>a-.C\~~ <:> <:> C<
gi~~"":~~~~ ,...: -i -
'" <:> oD
'" <-' '"
~
~ '" '"
-i -i
~~ CO ""
<-' <-'
~
~ '"
ci>
.. '" ...
! ... oD
oD
'" '"
" -i -i
'" '"
'" '"
.. ,...: ,...:
s: <:>
~ -
.... ....
.. .,; .,;
.. ..
III - -
<'\ <'\
-' .... ....
oD
~ ..s:> '"
'"
e <-'
'" ....
s % .cO~~~~~O ~ ~
u ~~~~~::;;~..\::.~o .... ....
s. <-' <-'
fS
~ ~
0 .... ....
<:><:><:><:>~",_...""<'c\C< ~ <f,
~ <-'
ooo",,:S:.j,-i""~"<:> ..s:>
'" '"
""",,,, - ..; ..;
7i% . . '0000000" <;! <;!
~;:~ooooooo~ - -
ra ---
i '" '"
~ ~"!<'\<:><:><:>oo<:>o;:' ..; ..;
e ~ <;! <-'
~;:~ooooooo~ -
--- - -
t: ';:: ...,
~ .. .
~ <:> <:>
i 0 0
i - -
~~'"'*: '" ..... ....
~ .j, .. ...
e ..",,,,
III <:> a
'5~ 0 0
~..
~
"! "!
~ ",-- 0 <-' - -
~"'....; -i ... <;! <;!
'5
.. ..
~ ~ <-' .,; on
::> <f, -;:. -;:.
" -
~ ill
0 ':t
...fS ",.."'oD,;;;~~*~ga. \ ~
~~ i \
...::> cO cO to co c:oco~
...~
~
~
0
~ ~ ...
'"
- i ?
UJ 0
0 3
... ~
- ~
t: e
3 '"
0
0 ~
CC ...
-- ~ ...
~ ?
...
\JJ
~
::l
OJ
%
.t:.
~
3'
~
\;;
~ ,~
v -
",0-
~~
-'"
..;>-
OJ
I -S
I-OJ
5~
~~
~~
oo.s
"'c:
0":
IS.
z!!
-\!
~
~
o
as
00
co
.D
....
...
'"
"'&
~
OJ
;;;
~
OJ
\;;
::l
g
1
OJ
-S
~
.~
~
~
>-
,.
c:
'"
~
::l
o
';;
~
0-
S
"&
~
OJ
\;;
~
,.
.~
OJ
~~ ~
-g ~ ~
"'''' oD
~% ci
~1l ~
.... "" OJ
aiPE . ~
~~~ ~
~~~ E
"OOVl <
~~~ ~
-o~~ a:
"'0 OJ 0- OJ
IX.~C ~
tU 0... 0 <<.
~ ~"'& ~
~'~~ ~
~~ '" ~
..9- v 0
",&"':ov"'-';
o..:a ~~~ t
..2 <<a E.OOM"'O
~\-'-~~~
~%~"CI",.R
Sj~~~~
",&o<~VOJ
~-s~'1A:~
a..~..c<o,..;"'"
:-s!?~=~
~",,2.---
~~-s.S5~
'S o..~ ~ ~ ~
~.~~ ~
~~~ .g-
~l-a.. \-
Vi
~
z
_Nro-;
-<i
- ------.-.-- ...-----------------
EXHIBIT "F"
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4d 03-14-1997
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Streets (E-W) Gateway
Analyst KLF
Area Type Other
Comment Stage 3 Improvements
(N-S) High Ridge
File Name' ANAL-2 HC9
3-12-97 PM Peak
- Master Plan Amendment No. 8
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound
1 L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R
1---- ---- ----1---- ---- ----1---- ---- ----1---- ----
No Lanes I 2 4 1 I 2 3 1 I 2 1 2 I 2 1 1
Volumes I 408 2319 1461 285 2013 4851 367 108 6501 567 35 435
Lane W (ft)112 0 12 0 12 0112 0 12 0 12 0112 0 12 0 12 0112 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 1 35l 351 351 35
Lost Time 13 00 3 00 3 0013 00 3 00 3 0013 00 3 00 3 0013 00 3 00 3 00
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8
EB Left * INB Left *
Thru * 1 Thru *
Right * 1 Right *
Peds 1 Peds
WB Left * ISB Left * *
Thru * 1 Thru * *
Right * 1 Right * *
Peds I Peds
NB Right * IEB Right *
SB Right * IWB Right *
Green 26.0A 64 OA I Green 28 OA 50A110A
Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 IYellow/AR 4 0 o 0 4 0
Cycle Length 150 sees Phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat vie g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
-------
EB L 637 3539 o 694 o 180 39 5 D 26 9 D
T 3229 7451 o 832 o 433 25 7 D
R 1024 1583 o 114 o 647 6 5 B
WB L 637 3539 o 485 o 180 36 2 D 31 0 D
T 2421 5588 o 963 o 433 34 8 D
R 1024 1583 o 463 o 647 89 B
NB L 684 3539 o 582 o 193 36 5 D 38 8 D
T 149 1863 o 765 o 080 574 E
R 887 3167 o 824 o 280 37 1 D
SB L 802 3539 o 767 o 227 38 2 D 39 0 D
T 211 1863 o 175 o 113 38 9 D
R 496 1583 o 849 o 313 40 2 E
Intersection Delay = 31.6 seclveh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9 0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0 874
-----------------------------------------------------------------------