Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS ANNUALSTATUSREPORi Reportmg Penod 1997 1U:CETVFD QUANTUM PARK ANNUAL STATUS REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST ^ f)'~ ~ lcqR ~TY MANAGER'S OFFICE. .. -,. REPORT ADDRESSES Ms. Keny Willis CIty Manager CIty of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL ~3425-03l 0 Mr Jim Golden Semor Planner, Regulation Department South Flonda Water Management DIstnct 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, Flonda 33402 Mr James Snyder DR! Coordinator Treasure Coast RegIOnal Plannmg Council 3228 S W Martm Downs Blvd., SUIte 205 POBox 1529 Palm CIty, Flonda 34990 Mr Brad Hartman DIrector Office of EnvIronmental ServIces Flonda Game & Freshwater Fish Comm. 620 South MendIan Street Tallahassee, Flonda 32399-1600 Ms. DebbIe Pamsh Duector of Intergovernmental Programs State of Florida Department of Envuonmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Blvd./MS 47 Tallahassee, Flonda 32399-2400 Mr Donald L. Lockhart Duector ofPlannmg and AdrmmstratlOn Palm Beach County Sohd Waste Authonty 5114 Okeechobee Boulevard, SUIte 2C West Palm Beach, Flonda 33417-4575 Mr James F Murley, Secretary Department of Commumty AffaIrs 2571 Executive Center CIrcle, East Tallahassee, Flonda 32301 Mr Charles PattIson, DIrector DIV of Resource Plannmg & Management Bureau of State Plannmg 2740 CentervIew Dnve Tallahassee, Flonda 32399 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reportmg Penod 1997 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT ANNUAL STATUS REPORT QUANTUM PARK f/k/a QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK f/k/a QUANTUM PARK AT BOYNTON BEACH f/k/a BOYNTONBEACHPARKOFCOMNffiRCE FOR THE PERIOD - JANUARY 1,1997 to DECEMBER 31,1997 -2- ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reportmg Penod 1997 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT REPORTING PERIOD JANUARY 1, 1997 to DECEMBER 31, 1997 DEVELOPMENT QUANTUM PARK f/k/a QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK f/k/a QUANTUM P ARK AT BOYNTON BEACH f/k/a BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE (Name ofDRI) LOCATION CIty' County' BOYNTON BEACH PALM BEACH COUNTY DEVELOPER, Name QUANTUM ASSOCIATES, a Flonda General PartnershIp Address Merchants Plaza 15th Floor - East Tower 115 West Waslungton Street IndIanapolIs, IN 46204 1 Descnbe any changes made m the proposed plan of development, phasmg, or m the representatIOns contamed m the ApplIcatIOn for Development Approval smce the Development of RegIonal Impact received approval. Note any actIOns (substantial deViation detemllnatIOns) taken by local government to address these changes. Note If a response IS more than one sentence, attach as ExhibIt A a detaIled descnptIOn of each change and copIes of the modified SIte plan drawings. Exhibit A should also address the followmg Items If applIcable a. Describe changes m the plan of development or phasmg for the reportmg penod and subsequent years. b State any known mcremental DRI applIcatIOns for development approval or request for a substantial deViatIOn determination that were filed in the reporting period and to be filed durmg the next year -3- ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reportmg Penod 1997 c. Attach a copy of any notice of the adoptIon of a development order or the subsequent modIficatIOn of an adopted development order that was recorded by the developer pursuant ~ to SubsectIOn 380 06(14), F S ~ ~ ~SPONSE SEE EXlllBIT A ANNEXED HERETO 2 Has there been a change m local government junsdIctIOn for any portIon ofthe development smce the development order was Issued? If so, has the annexmg local government adopted a new Development of Regional Impact development order for the project? ProvIde a copy of the order adopted by the annexmg local government. RESPONSE THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT JURISDICTION 3 ProVIde copIes of any revIsed masterplans, mcremental site plans, etc., not prevIOusly submItted. RESPONSE SEE EXHIBIT B ANNEXED HERETO 4 ProVIde a summary comparIson of development actIvIty proposed and actually conducted for the reportmg period as well as a cumulatIve total of development proposed and actually conducted to date. RESPONSE SEE EXHIBIT C ANNEXED HERETO 5 Have any undeveloped tracts ofland m the development (other than indIVIdual smgle-family lots) been sold durmg the reportmg penod to a separate entity or developer? If so, Identify tract, Its SIze, and the buyer ProvIde maps whIch show the tracts mvolved. RESPONSE. SEE EXHIBIT D ANNEXED HERETO 6 Describe any lands purchased or optIOned adjacent to the ongmal Development of RegIOnal Impact SIte subsequent to Issuance of the development order Identify such land, ItS SIze, and mtended use on a SIte plan and map. RESPONSE SEE EXHIBIT E ANNEXED HERETO -4- ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reportmg Penod 1997 7 LIst any substantial local, state, and federal permits wmch have been obtained, apphed for, or demed, dunng tills reportmg penod. SpecIfy the agency, type of permIt, and duty of each. RESPONSE SEE EXHIBIT F ANNEXED HERETO 8 PrOVIde a hst specIfymg each development order conditIon and each developer commItment as contaIned m the ADA and state how and when each condItIOn or commItment has been comphed wIth dunng the annual reportmg penod. Note Attach as ExhibIt "G" RESPONSE SEE EXHIBIT G ANNEXED HERETO 9 PrOVIde any mformatIon that IS specIfically reqUired by the Development Order to be mcluded m the annual report. RESPONSE SEE EXHIBIT H ANNEXED HERETO 10 PrOVIde a statement certIfymg that all persons have been sent copIes of the annual report m conformance wIth Subsections 380 06(15) and (18), F S RESPONSE THAT THE UNDERSIGNED, ON BEHALF OF THE DEVELOPER, CERTIFIES THAT ALL PERSONS HAVE BEEN SENT COPIES OF THIS ANNUAL STATUS REPORT IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTIONS 380906(15) AND (18), FLA. STATS (1989) Person Completmg the QuestIOnnaIre James G Willard, EsqUire Title Attorney and Authonzed Agent Representmg' Quantum SImon, Inc., m its capaCIty as a general partner of Quantum ASSOCIates Ongmal Report: CIty of Boynton Beach -5- ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reportmg Period 1997 EXHIBIT A CHANGES IN THE PROPOSED PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT 1 The followmg IS a lIst of the Amendments to the DR! Development Order winch have been approved. A. On June 3,1997 the CIty ComnussIOn of the CIty of Boynton Beach adopted Ordmance No 97-20, which further amended the Development Order for the Quantum Park DR! by adoptmg revIsed Master SIte Development Plan No 8 B On December 17, 1996, the City ComnussIOn of the CIty of Boynton Beach adopted Ordmance No 96-65, which further amended the Development Order for the Quantum Park DR! by adoptmg revIsed Master SIte Development Plan No 7, winch mcludes mdustnal and research and development, together WIth office use, as a permItted land use for Lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37, and 38 WIthIn Quantum Park and to change Lots 80, 81 and 82 from office to mdustnal/commercIal use. C On July 16, 1996, the CIty CommISSIon of the CIty of Boynton Beach adopted Ordmance No 96-33, wmch further amended the Development Order for the Quantum Park DR! by adoptmg revIsed Master SIte Development Plan No 6, winch added Lots 80, 81 and 82 to the DR! and mcluded commercIal use as a permItted land use for Lots 65A, 65B, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 91 WIthm Quantum Park, and deleted commercIal use as a pernutted land use for Lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62 wIthm Quantum Park. D On November 15, 1994, the CIty CommIssion of the CIty of Boynton Beach adopted Ordmance No 94-51, winch further amended the Development Order for the Quantum Park DR! by adoptmg Master Site Development Plan No.5, winch revised the land use desIgnatIOn of Lots 12, 13 and 14 from office to office/research and development. E. On Apnl 19, 1994, the CIty CommISSIOn of the City of Boynton Beach adopted Ordmance No 94-10, winch further amended the Development Order for the Quantum Park DR! by adoptmg Master SIte Development Plan No 4, which reflects the locatIOn of a 46.38 acre publIc hIgh school SIte m the southwest portIon of Quantum Park DR!, and reduced 30.29 acres ofmdustnal, 12.54 acres of research and development, and -6- ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Reportmg Penod 1997 3.55 acres of roadway, as well as the redeslgnation of Tract 40 as office/governmentaVinstItutIonal and Tract 41-A as research and development/governmental and mstItutIOnal. F On February 2, 1988, the CIty CommISSIon of the CIty of Boynton Beach adopted Ordmance No 88-3, wmch further amended the Development Order for the Quantum Park DR! by adoptmg Master SIte bevelopment Plan No 3 G On October 21, 1986, the City CommIssIon of the CIty of Boynton Beach adopted Ordmance No 86-37, which further amended the Development Order for the Quantum Park DR! by adoptmg Master SIte Development Plan No 2, and by changmg the name of the development to Quantum Park at Boynton Beach, as well as requmng that the Development Order be revIsed to conform to the Memorandum from R. Thomas Powers to Ed Deutsch, dated July 3, 1986, and the Traffic AnalYSIS Updated prepared by K.1mely-Hom and ASSOCIates, Inc., dated July 3, 1986 H. On June 3, 1986, the CIty CommISSIOn of the CIty of Boynton Beach adopted Ordmance No 86-11, WhICh amended the Development Order for the Quantum Park DR! by adoptmg the Amended Master SIte Development Plan, and by requmng that the Development Order be reVIsed to conform to the representatIOns set forth m the letter from George W Zimmerman to Carmen Annuziato, dated February 28, 1986 I a. F or a descnptIOn of changes m the plan of development for the reportmg penod, please reVIew Items A-H hsted above. 1 b At tlus tIme, there are no requests for substantial devIatIOn determmatIOns that are expected to be filed m 1998 1 c. CopIes of the notIces of the AdoptIOn of the Development Order and notIces of all subsequent modificatIOns to the Development Order are attached hereto, Exhibit A-I -7- PROPOSAL OF OUANTUM ASSOCIATES FOR MAY 20TH BOYNTON BEACH CITY COMMISSION MEETING Quantum Associates hereby amends its master plan modification and proposes the following conditions be adopted by the City Commission in addition to the recommendations of the Planning and Development Board 32 Delete commercial from Lots 83, 84, 85, 68A, 68B, 69, 70, 72, 57, 56, 73B, 73A, 74, 75 and 76 (The result of this deletion will be to expand potential commercial use only (~t_s~~d for hotel use, i e Lots IJ Delete condition 20 of Exhibit "F" (no longer needed since virtually all of the commercial expansion has been eliminated) OK33 o Is( 34 Delete note Amendment No 5 on the 8 proposed March 6 Master Plan @/-L Replace "club" with "restaurant" on note 2 of the Master Plan .--- ------~----~- -.~------------~-____.. ~ 36.~te a revised Master Site Development Plan Amendment ~ jI ~~~Q 8 dated today, May 20, 1997, consistent with t C tonight's City Commission action and direct staff to generate a new proposed Ordinance incorporating the <I> revis,ed May 20 Master Plan Amendme;'t ~--=------__ ?Iff. ~'----- --- (i/) J 1 35 .._~._---------- r-~_ 4==~ ~~-~ ORL95 51005.1 SMW 05120/97 ;/ - .pf7;?- J~/LS~ iLl It~P~ V f6 . LITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORillA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM FROM. PLANNING & ZONING DATE. DEPARTMENT IIA~UBJECT SGT MARLON HARRISWV~REFERENCES POLICE DEPARTMENT 22 MAY 97 FILE. TO' QUANTUM PARK DR! 23 ENCLOSURES L-~7"" ,. ' ( V~:t '{ ;. ~._.' ~ \ ----'~.,. Regarding the Quantum Park DR!, there IS no cost incurred for reVIew of the plans.- . 05!27/1597 16 14 5613647382 ~ W FI RE PRE\, ~~e CUff 0/ Bo'lnlon Beach :lire - !<eJctu :1>epaJ"lmenl Fire Prevention Division C/O The City of Boynton Beach 1 00 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33435 FAX FAX FAX TO' Tambn Heyden~ Planning DIViSIon FAX #. 561-375-6259 FROM. W. Cavanau&b. FPO I FAX # 561-364..7382 SUBJECT Abandonment of Quantum Blvd. REMARKS FAX PAGE 131 NO OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER. 3 OS/27/1997 16 14 561:1::47382 FI RE PRE\! Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 97-251 continued The following is the approximate cost for the Fire Department to review this project, including secretarial support: W Cavanaugh: L Morales 1 hr @ $37 50 per hr 1 hr. @ $12.07 oef hr. Total $49.57 (pay rate Include benefits) PAGE 02 MEMORANDUM Utilities #97-145 ~ .., ~; ( i i UJ r-"-~'''"-' II n H j!::!1l f./\2? .....;. ~~"_! ; L L.o , ~ ~~~e,......~' TO. Tambn Heyden, Director-j' Plannlllg & Zon~ \ John A. GUIdry, \\ \J Utilities Director ~ May 19, 1997 FROM. DATE SUBJECT Quantum Park DR! Master Plan Modification - First Review The followlllg lllformatIon llldIcates the staff tIme and admIlllstrabve costs for the above referenced project: Peter Mazzella - 3 hours @ $27.23/hour + 30% Frlllge Benefits = $106 19 Clyde Milor - 1 hour @ $20.53/hour + 30 % Frlllge Benefits = $ 26 69 Total $13288 19b xc Peter Mazzella SkIp MIlor File rr.r.! - _ ~- J r"' ~ y- Ii t:.i: 'JM 3 f!! ~EArE [T L .~ ~ j - " , " ~ ... ~ -'I~ 5~qq ~ w t? MEMORANDUM UtilitIes #97- i 45 DA TB. fambn Heyden. Director , Planning & Zo~ ~ ;1 John A. GUidry, \ \. % Utilities Director \j . Ma) 19, 1997 TO' FROM. SUBJECT Quantum Park DR! Master Plan Modification - First Review The following mfonnatlon indicates the staff~ime and admlnlstr~lve casts for the above retcfel,ced proJect. peter Mazzella - 3 hours @ $27 .23/hour + 30% fnllge Benefits "" $) 06.l9 Clyde Mllor - I hour @ $20 S3/hO'Jr - 30 ~ Fnnge Bc;nefits = $ 26 .69 Total $132.88 19b xc' Peter Mazzella Skip Milor File !\ ~~\A ~i ~t/Y!..1-j - {!jUJ/l ~Jw~ r1p~ (\J 0 rid- ',' C ~"" . IU 'h,u.-t rtG0-<-:co-e._A-9' ~\~tti/ ')~ ~~~- ~U- LL~ {.{:~~ (;c G--t4:t-l,., r- u--- --- RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-224 TO FROM Tambri Heyden, Planing & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks superintenden~ Quantum Park D R. I. Date May 16, 1 997 fDI rlli~@~]_.L W lli 1 ill \ : J\ 1 ! II !' n : ,r"'7 ,U :;. .. Ai' I" ". . ;\ i I h I"Y I 6 ,.,.~ I ; P..JWi ' J ~I 1.----. l P. ,. J' plD f L....:.' \\J r.I'I ZbN:f~G DEFT. RE. During the recent review of the plans for the Quantum Park D R I The following costs were incurred Parks Superintendent 1 hour == $29 00 JW RECREA TION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-226 TO FROM RE DATE. Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Kevin J Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist KJ ff Quantum Park 0 R.I. May 16, 1997 The following is a cost for my review to complete the above Forester/Environmentalist - 1 hour - $24 95 KHad r 'CO ("" :? n ,Ii P n Ii> ,!U h I'!! I" ! n I f.:! \~!--l-~::..".L.~. \.1'"1 l ~ I , · i Ii ! I ~ or, q I l! ~.^^V I 9/"17 ~ f ! i ~ I.!~' e#../ .... - l . , i L_.~~-~. ___-----I P7L~ ~,!;;Q"b~[) j > f..,1: Ln... V..I .. -~.-_- DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO 97-094 May 16, 1997 TO Tambn Heyden Planmng and Zonmg DIrector FROM. Al Newbold Deputy DIrector of Development RE QUANTUM PARK D.R.I. - REVIEW TIME & CHARGES Time and charges for the last reVIew of thIS proJect, mcludmg clerical tIme, are as follows. Consultmg engmeer John Yeend 1hr $12500 Anthony OCChlUZZO 1.5 hrs. 34.32 Ken Hall 1.5 hrs. 3482 Carol Kribs 5hr 12.81 Total cost $206.95 .A(/~.. /'/.~ r~l/ t..;!(/ ~ J.," It}' "'" AI New. old bg XC Milan Knor C:\BOYNTON\Documents\TRC\Quantum Park DRI.doc PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORAi.'1DUM NO 97-213 TO Chauman and Members Planrung and Development Board FROM Tambri J Heyden, AICP --;};L- Plannmg and ZOnIng DIrector DA IE May 8, 1997 SUBJECT Quantum Park - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001 Master Plan Amendment No 8 (combine land uses, add optIonal uses to lots, sever Quantum Boulevard) NA TIJRE OF REOUEST Quantum Park of Commerce, a partIally bwlt-out Development of Regional Impact (DR!) comprised of 539 9 acres, zoned PID (Planned Industnal Development), IS located on the wesr sIde of 1-95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton (C-16) Canal (see attached locatton map - 2xhibit "A"). James G. Willard, EsqUire and agent for Quantum Associates, property owner of the Quantum Park of Commerce, has requested an amendment to their DRI development order, Ordinance No. 84-51 as amended by Ordinance No. 86-11, 86-37, 88-3, 94- 10, 94-51, 96-33 and 96-65 The proposed amendments whIch revise the master plan (master SIte development plan) are as follows. 1) Change in traffic distribution due to possible future severing of Quantum Boulevard between lots 22 and 31 and lots 8 through 11 2) Change in the master plan designation of lots 8, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. 22, 23, 24, 25, 28,27,28,29,30,31,2,3, 15, 18 and 40A from office to officeJindustrial use. 3) Change in the master plan designation of lots 1, 66, 87 A and 67C from otllcelhotel use to officeJindustrial/commercial use; 4) Ch.nge in the master plan designation of lots 12, 13 and 14 from office/research ... development to office use; ---~---- 5) CIwIge in the master plan designation of lots 32, 33. 34A, 348, 35, 36, 37 a~, 38 from otrIcelindustrial to industrial use; 8) Change in the master plan designation of lots 17,18, 19.21,39. 52,83,84 and 85 from offtce to officelindustrial/commercial use; 7) Change in the master plan designation of lot 40 from otIIceIgovernment and institutional to government and institutional use; 8) Change in the master plan designation of lots 58, 59, 80, 81 and 62 from industrial/research and development to officelindustrial use; 9) Change in the master plan designation of lots 88. 87, 88. 89A, 89B and 90B from research and development to office/industrial use; 10) Change in tM meeter plan deslgnauon of Iota 65A, 858, 678 and 91 from otficelhoteUcommercial to offtcelindustriallcommerciaJ use; 11) Change in the master plan designation of lots 63 and 64 from otrIcelcommercial to ofrIcelindustriallcommercial use; 12) Change in the master plan designation of lot 90A from research and development to government and institutional use; I .,. .., Page 2 Memorandum No. 97-213 Quantum - MPMD 97-0011DRIA 97-001 13) Change in the master plan designation of lots 68A and 68B from research and development to office/industrial/commercial use, 14) Change In the master plan designation of lots 56, 57 69, 70, 72, 73A, 73B, 74 and 75 from industrial to office/industrial/commercial use, 15) Change in the master plan designation of lots 46A, 48A, 48B, 48C 50A, SOB 51 Band 51 0 from industrial to office/industrial use; 16) Change in the master plan designation of lots 76, 77, 78 and 79 from industrial/commercial to commercial use, 17) Change in the master plan designation of lot 80 from industriaVcommercial to commercial use, and ~ Change In the master plan designation of lots 81 and 82 from Industnal/commercial to office/industrial/commercial use. BACKGROUND . The amendment request is governed by Section 7 of Appendix A, Zoning, City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, which establishes Planned Industrial Development Districts and by Chapter 38006 (19) (e) (2), Florida Statutes, Developments of Regional Impact - Substantial Deviations. This amendment is submitted in connection With a request from the apphcant that: 1) the city make a determination that the master plan amendment is not substantial in nature and 2) the proposed change to the Quantum Park DR! development order a) is not a substantial deviation and b) does not require further Development of Regional Impact review A public hearing must be conducted by the City Commission prior to making a determination as to whether the proposed change is substantial In nature and whether further development of regional impact review is required. If no further review is required, the City Commission shall issue an amended development order which, In this mstance, requires the passage of an ordinance which amends the original development order If a determination is made that the proposed change requires further development of regional impact review, the review shall be conducted only on those aspects of the development order reqUIred to be changed. The required public hearing shall receive a fifteen (15) day public notice, following the passage of thirty (30) days, but not more than forty-five (45) days after receipt of the amendment mateiials. The City Commission will conduct Its heanog on May 20, 1997, as advertised, and if the City Commission determines the proposed changes to be non-substantial, with no further review required, first poAI'tiT'g of the amended Quantum Park development order (an ordinance) will occur on May 20, 1997 as well. On December 17, 1996, the City Commission approved an amendment to the Quantum Parle master plan in connection with the seventh amendment to the Quantum Park DR! development order At this time, the Commission agreed to retam note 4 on the master plan in exchange for Quantum Park preparing a revised master plan having a "use trading matrix", prior to any future change to a lot deSignated commercial on the Quantum Park master plan. Note 4 reads, "Lots ~ Page 3 Memorandum No. 97-213 Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001 WithIn the project may be changed/relocated by approval of the City Commission without further DRI review or amendment." The subject request has been submitted to address the Comnllsslon s December 17, 1996 duectlon to the applicant wluch IS necessary now to allow approval of a restaurant (commercial) on the recently approved Hampton Inn parcel (lot 1) ANAL YSIS J Exlublt B contaIns the proposed master site development plan. Added to each lot Impacted by I this request are the current approved land use designatIOns for ease of comparison within this / exhibit. The chart below summanzes the nwnber of lots Impacted by this request. #"... ""\ / ~------------,---,,----/,- -~~-----'- ~------c.--,_- FROM TO NUMBER OF LOTS LOT NUMBERS Office Office Industrial 21 6,7,8,9,10,11,22.23 24,25,26,27.28,29 30,31,2,3,15,16,40A OfficeIHote1 Office Industrial Commercial 4 1 66, 67 A, 67C OfficeIResearch &: Development Office 3 12,13 14 t OfficelIndustrial Industrial 8 32, 33, 34A, 348, 35 36,37,38 \. Offic~ Office Industrial Commercial 9 17, 18, 19 21 39 52 83, 84, 85 Office/ Government &: IDstitutioaaI Government &: Institutional 1 40 IndustriaJ/Resarc &: [)evelopD_ Office Industrial 5 58, 59, 60, 61 62 Research &: OiL . . ,., Office Industrial 6 86,87,88, 89A. 898, 908 OfficelHoeft'O --rciaI Office Industrial Commercial 4 6SA, 658, 678. 91 Office/Commercial Office Industrial Commercial 2 63.64 Research &: Development Government &: Institutional 1 90A Research &: Development Office Industrial Commercial 2 68A. 688 Industrial Office Industrial Commercial 9 56.57.69, 70. 72. 73A. 738. 74 75 Industrial Office Industrial 8 46A. 48A. 488, 48C, SOA. 50B, 51B. 510 Industrial/Commercial Commercial 4 76. 77, 78, 79 IndustriallCommercial CIJr"..JJlen:ial 1 80 Industrial/Commercial Oftic:eIIDdustriallCommercial 2 81.82 As shown 10 the chart above, the option of industnal is being added to a net of 34 lots; the optIon of commercial is being added to a net of 24 lots; and the option of office is being added to a net of211ots. Exhibit C graphically 1llustrates the lot locations of the optional land uses of primary 3 -- ~ Page 4 Memorandum No. 97-213 Quantum - MPMD 97-0011DRlA 97-001 mterest. In general terms. mdustnalls bemg added to the northwest comer of the PID (adjacent to the Dos Lagos PUD). at the northeast comer of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road and on the south SIde of Gateway Boulevard, between Quantum Lakes Dnve and Park Ridge Boulevard. ComrnercIalls bemg added to the lots along the eastern segment of Park Ridge Boulevard (mcludmg four lots the back up to 1-95) Both commerCIal and mdustnal are bemg added along Gateway Boulevard. The effect of thIs, If approved, would be to allow commerCIal uses along the entire stretch of Gateway Boulevard (excludmg three BGI lots) and abuttmg 1-95 With any redistribution or redesIgnatlOn of land use WithIn the master plan, the follOWIng local Issues are evaluated. Does the redistributionlredeslgnatlon of land use result m a change m concept for the Quantum Park of Commerce or the abIlity of the Park to develop in a quality manner? 2. What unpact will the land use redlstributionlredesignation have on projected expenditures which wIll be spent Within the region? . 3 Does the impact of the land use redistributionlredesignation result in a COnflICt with the number, type and payroll level of jobs projected m Quantum Park's Application for Development Approval (ADA)? 4 What unpact will the land use redistributionlredesignation have on adjacent property? 5 Will there be an mcrease m traffic resulting from the land use redistributionlredesignation? RegardiDa iIIaI .. above, last summer, the applicant submitted a master plan amendment/DRl amend'1lelllt telllow, among other things, the option of commercial on alll-9S abutting lots, most of .. .... side of the eastern segment of Park Ridge Boulevard, as well as along the GateWay .~ _ ~d corridor east of Quantum Lakes Drive. As a condition of approval, the applicant was requiIed by the Commission to not only limit the total acres of commercial, but designate the exact location of those 47 acres. This was in response to the following concerns which city statfbelieve apply to the subject request as well. a. The "option" of commercial on such a large number of lots defeats the purpose of master planning and will lead to spotty locating of commercial uses with no consideration of adjacent uses. b. Commercial uses, which draw customers, pedestrians and vehicles, haphazardly mixed with industrial uses, which require greater tractor trailer traffic, is potentially unsafe and is not recommended by transportation planners. c. Adding the option of commercIal use on lots along Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road and along the railroad tracks and 1-95 will impact the type of commercial ventures interested in locating in Quantum Park. This shift will attract commercial uses such u service stations, fast food restaurants, oil cbanae garages, and strip commercial that will be interested in the 1-95 visibility and capturing external project traffic, with little rehwon to the planned industrial park. d. In the vicmity of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road, west of Congress Avenue alone, there is already 500,000 square feet of commercial square 4 Page 5 Memorandum No. 97-213 Quantum - MPMD 97-00 liD RIA 97-001 footage approved. unbuIlt and vested Since 1990 These approvals, as well as the Visions 20/20 commercial revttal1zatlon efforts planned for Federal Highway, WIll be competmg Wlth the pnme VISIbIlIty, hIgh traffic commercial lots proposed In Quantum Park, due to the type of commercial uses that Wll1 now be Interested In locatmg In Quantum Park. Smce the demand for commerCIal land use LS firute, some eXisting commercial uses WIthIn the City may mIgrate to Quantum Park. e. Strip commercial and the types of commercial uses that will be Interested In locating close to the 1-95 interchange wIll lead to re-subdivisIon of the maJonty of the proposed commercIal parcels along Gateway Boulevard Into smaller parcels and the creatIon of outbwldings, whIch WIll Increase the appearance of more commercial use m the PID This is because, although the land area would not increase, more commercLal bwldmgs would result Since the types of commercIal referenced reqwre_ smaller parcels than IS currently platted along Gateway Boulevard. Also, there would be the potential for stacking of buildings and signage; all competing for visibilIty and access to remam VIable; factors less important for office and manufacturing uses. f. As stated in the zoning code, "The purpose of the PID district is to provide a zoomg classification for hght industrial development that will better satisfy current demands for light industrial zoned lands by encouraging development which Wll1 reflect chan~es in the technolo~ of land developnent and relate the development of land to the specific site and to conserve natural amenities." The increased option of commercial space causes a shift in the image of the PID, especially as viewed from the 1-95 interehange; one of the major gateways to the city This shift has no connection to any change in industrial technology and the demand for industrial land. Rather than creating unique opportunities for development not provided elsewhere in the city, the shift competes wia other areas of the city g. It ... been argued by the applicant that the city can control undesirable commercial _ through the use approval process. The use approval process is the method ctm.l for a PID to establish uses pennitted for a specific PID district, rather than establish in the zoning code a rigid list of permitted uses. This method was devised for flexibility and to keep up with technology as new uses ate created in the marketplace. However, to allow blanket approval of commen:ial, without considering locatioual impacts, defeats the purpose of master plannil'l8 and weakens the CIty'S ability to deny a specific commercial use at the time of use approval if a parcel bas already been designated for commercial use. h. The proposed commmial option of all the lots south of Gateway Boulevard that back up to the railroad tracks and 1-95 will encourage further conflicts with the PI0 peripheral greenbelt required to be mstalled along the railroad tracks and the approved Quantum Park sign program. This is due to the desire of these uses, more so than other uses, to have unobstructed visibility of buildings, signage and exterior storage and display areas from 1-95, examples of which can be seen within other cities along 1-9S This was the reason tIult the maiority of the oommercia1lot~ are located intemally to the park on the approved master plan. 1. Over the past two years, there has been increasing interest in loc.ftW8 manufacturing uses within Quantum Park. In recognition of the cityYs need to attract research and development and light mdustrial uses to dIVersIfy Its economic base, the CIty aggreSSIVely pursued BGI to locate m Quantum Parle. The city also Identified economic development as one of Its viSIoning goals. Towards that end an economic /"" ~ ~ "WI' Page 6 Memorandum No. 97-213 Quantum. MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001 ...aggR!SSlvel) putSUed BGlto locatc-...J.n 01lannl"l Park. The elf;')' aliQ Idcnufied econormc-devetopmentasonec,.fm "Islomng goab. Towards that end an econonuc development dIrector was lured last September and an econonuc incentIve program for Quantwn Park was adopted applicable to developments bnngmg In a certain nwnber of jobs. The Jobs however, also needed to pay a certaIn nummwn salary Also, as one of the CIty'S recently adopted "quick victory" VlSlOnIng proJects, a fonnal marketIng program Will be developed WithIn 90 days to further promote Quantum Park as an mdustnal park. As a point of interest, Boca Raton IS currently processing a DR! for the vacant IBM buildmg and 500 acres In the VICInIty for a 5 million square foot bght industnal park! This action signals further competItion, and also indicates a strong market at tlus time for light Industnal uses. Regarding Issue two above, it is anticipated that the proposed master plan changes will have no effect on the projected expenditures wtuch Will be spent within the region. Regarding issue three above, It is believed that the proposed master plan changes will have an effect on the number, type" and payroll level of jobs projected m Quantum Park's origmal application for Development Approval (ADA). This is because allowing the option of commercial on lots with high VIsibIlIty, and high pass-by traffic will encourage development of these lots as commercial over mdustnal. The pay range for service sector jobs IS smaller and industrial acreage provides a greater number of Jobs than commercial acreage. Jobs salaries are, in turn, linked to home pnces. Attracting lugher priced residential developments was also a Visions 20120 objective. Regarding issue 4 (impact on adjacent property), there is a concern with locating industrial uses adjacent to the Dos Lagos PUD. This is based on the experience the city bas had with complamts from the residents south of Quantum Park regarding truck, radio and voice noise and early hours of operation of the iDdusIrial uses along the south border of the Park and as far away as the Publix DistribuDoa C 1 r~ I . The bu1fering proposed WIll only provide visual, and not auditory, InltIgation due to the 'IIL ~ iDcompatibility of these uses. RegardiDa... 5 (1raftic), the city does not have a traffic engineer or traffic planner on board and does not budaet for outside review of subInltted traffic studies, therefore the city must rely on the regional pJanning council's (RPC) review of Quantum Park's traffic study Exhibit "0" contains the RPC's comments on the study It also contains FOOT's traffic comments (on state roads only) and the project traffic engineer's response to the RPC's comments. The RPC, nor Palm Beach County, bad sufficient time to review the traffic engineer's response prior to the writing of this report. Therefore, traffic concerns will have to be resolved prior to CommillSion approval of tins request. As a pomt of mformation, staff has also asked the RPC to make a recommendation regarding the timing of the widenin& of Gateway Boulevard. The development order indicates that this was to be done by the end of 1994 Since build out of the project bas occurred more slowly than expected, this timeframe needs to be adjusted accordingly , In addition to the redesignation of lots for greater flexibility, Quantum Park Boulevard is proposed to be severed. This would allow consolidation of lots in this area for development by ODe industrial user. Although this will require a future abandonment application to be ~sed. it v.= included at this time because it is a regional issue and potentially impacts the ORI's road system due to redistribution of trips. Staff concerns from Engineering, Recreation amd Parks, Utilities and Fire Departments regarding this severing are included in Exhibit up" - ConditioDS of Approval. c Page 7 Memorandum No 97-213 Quantum - MPMD 97-001/DRIA 97-001 RECOMMENDATION To address the conflIcts staff has raIsed \\'lth tlus request's Impact on the CIty'S ObjectIve of actIvely promotmg Quantum Park as an mdustnal park, staff recommends the land use desIgnatIon changes Illustrated on ExhibIt "E" These changes mclude the followmg: deletIon of mdustnal on lots 3 and 22-31, 2 addItIOn ofmdustnal on lots 12-14, 3 deletIOn of commercIal on lots 17-19,21,39, 52, 56, 57, 72, 70, 69, 73A, 73B, 74, 75, 83-85, 68A and 68B, 4 deletIon of commercIal, but retammg hotel use on lots 66, 67 A and 67C, 5 addItion of office to lots 32,33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 Pursuant to Flonda Statutes, Chapter 380 06( 19) Substantial DeVIations, the submitted amendment IS conSIdered to be an (e )(3) type change (a change not specifically classIfied elsewhere under state law). Under (e)(3) changes, the applIcant must prOVIde "clear and convmcmg eVIdence" supportmg that Ius requested changes do not constitute a subStantIal deVIation. The only aspect of this request that might possibly constitute a substantIal deVIatIon is the redistribution of traffic caused by the large flexibIlity of land use allocation m the proJect. Therefore, staff recommends approval of tlus request, subject to staff comments in Exhibit "F" - Conditions of Approval, which must be addressed prior to adoptIon of the orcl.inance amending the developmeDt order Staff further recommends that the COII1IIllSSIOn detemune that tlus applIcation <:to. not constitute a substantial master plan change pursuant to local codes and does not constitute a substantial deviation under state law TJH dim Attachments xc. ApplicantlCentral File S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\MPMD\staffrepon.doc 1 ,.,. 'W EXHIBIT "A" . ? PRUJbC'I' 'l'l'l'LE u!::::ieRIP'llluN 'l'~ PI:. DA'l'E REC' D TP~CKl' Lu~ - BITE PLAN REVIEW ~( ~ pa;J~u II'f'l'AL NEW SITE PLAN AMOUNT MAJUR ~ITE FILE NU IJrf(11 () 11--001 PR I 11 1-;J () ) PLAN MODIFICATIuN RI:.<..:BIPT Nu * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) ::iET~ ~UBMITTED CuLURED ELEVATIuNS RECID (Plans shall be pre-assembled The Planning & Zoning Dept will number each sheet of their set The Planniqg Dept set will be ul3ed to check the remaining sets to e~sure the number and type of sheets match ) * * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICATION << SUB~ITTAL DATE ACCEPTED DENIED DATE DATE uF LETTER Tu APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMIS::iION DEFICIENCIES 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DENIED DATE DATE DATE UF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER REVIEWER'::) NAME * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * r I (Label TRC uepartments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMU NUMBER OF MEMU ::)ENT TO TRC Tu PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW DATE SEN'l' .3{.uJ RETURN DATE 4-!~ 1/ MEMO NUMBER Q7, (( t. ~j'~V 1st REVIEW COMMENT::) RECEIVED PLAN::) MEMO # I DA'l:E./ "C" PLAN::i MEMO # / DATE 1 II e" ~ util 9'109'~ I~ i~ Planning / If/J<J I- . p W 'I ~ 1 oC-7 / / c- Building Q'1 tJt/1 I Iv Parks '!.;f~,?:- /.~l C--- Engineer I 1- Fire r:; ,-.i3:l.. I I C-- Engineer crl- f.2j I l(-fJ. /- Police Y cl1,OOi!.C 1 d L/ 1 C/ forester Y I I~ fY P E. Ut' VARIANCE. (::i) DATE UF MEETINU DATE OF LETTI:.R SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENT::) (Aesthetic Review App I dates of board mtgs <<checklist sent out w/ commenLS NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIE~ (Must be assembled Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORED ELEVATIONS REC 10 MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PBRFORM 2nd REVIEW. DATE SENT MEMO # RETURN DATE 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL PLANS MEMO It / DATE I"R/D" PLANS MEMO It I DATE I"R/D" Util j I Planning I / P W j I Building / I Parks I I Engineer / / Fire I I Engineer I I Police / / Forster / I LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT ~IGN~ PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS IN~TALLED SCP-SDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD CC/CRA DA'l'Ji; API'ROVAL LE'l'TER SENT A 'l'RAeKING ::if> FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION Memorandum No. 97-232 rn@rno \,0 f7 \ "- \" ~ \ rn APR A~' PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT. TO Tambri Heyden, Director Planning & Zoning Department FROM William D Cavanaugh, FPO I /l1//() (ftb[ at u:t-tA.-l <- Fire Department /?'{/ 'f! I DATE April 4, 1997 SUBJECT Quantum Park PID Gateway Blvd & High Ridge Rd. We find we cannot accept this request at this time We especially take exception to the proposed vacating of Quantum Blvd Without any alternate routes proposed We feel that without the input of park tenants and neighbors, we would do a disservice to the citizens of Boynton to go further Experience with responses on Gateway Blvd, at peak hours, indicates to us that more In depth information is needed before we offer comment. CC Deputy Chief Gale FPO II Campbell File ~, <s '-J 'I/I? /"'7 I fL.4- /...; u;;: I ' I Ad U -+ f7+J /Vi /1'/4 Sl>^-. fit/?' LtJ4'L1<u~.5 '<?~cyJi.k~ ') #.:C:"J C'<:>V'-"I/\ ' A L" --- O. ~I ,,(. 61-' ~ /ilVo ~'/.6.(':! tJl)h~.:. ~ /J/U),IY'ltlL /-1-11' ;L.1.J' T'''''.IVL, ,. rV' /l1k'x rl.s / P_ . dA.--/)cn=---.:::> /)Lrc.~..A/A'ft': ~k: e..~L///'_? I , I'-<J;(I () i.., V 1.1<-- (~ / 77Z j? r 11" rJ-'-.'::;- .s,. t ,hJ))~ rA A I j ;- c ~ C/I.>t'v-r- ~ rv F /V 0f,AJI)~, I I ~ q;) r ,d' /rt>f"J.L5.::> v1<.. /f""; / /V .::.Jv /J ~=- l'l A-r: (C , c;l~~:r' . . .V: /f\ 'ooV., /! (~ f~ ,4/1/."1 C UJf/.V6 v Lj/vAV' (~J> IN/) Cf).~ 'rOr~L tpfP tl)JNI ^.,/tC-iAn/"'l~~T t/{ vv rr..; (.v ,IZ./...Af-,vT 1-"~ v l.. 7' '" 17J..... <. r-t h. i! C r J.. :s Ir/ CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO' FILE T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR FROM. SGT MARLON HARRIS POLICE DEPARTMENT DATE 24 MARCH 97 - L"~n\Vlrn@ PLAN ;~-'~ " MAR 7" g97 ~ r ~ ~.~.".' '~;"" QUANTUM PARK-MAS MODIFICATION-1st RE REFERENCES 97-0020 SUBJECT ENCLOSURES PlANNlf!G AND luN \i _!EPT. I have revIewed the above plans and have no comments. RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-129 I i (I R n ;' L'::l L ~__., : ill A~'~~ .< rp fS i~. ! I; -...I .~_.._.1 TO Tambl Heyden, Planmg and Zomng Drrector FROM. Kevm John Hallahan ,Forester/ Envrronmentahst ~&~ RE. Quantum Park-Master Plan Modification DATE April 2, 1997 1 The apphcant should have the approval of the Treasure Coast RegIonal Planmng Council to make the Master Plan modIficatIons. 2. There are numerous natural resource areas on the Quantum Corporate Park propertIes that have not been properly mamtamed. These areas mclude the 40 acre Sand Pme preserve, the Wetlands, the lakes, the mdlvlduallots mlcrosltes and roadway medlans/r.o w 's 3. The apphcant should lmtlate a comprehensIve plan to systematIcally address each ofthe above locatIons to perform the proper mamtenance. The above locatIOns whIch are adjacent to parcels at Quantum Park under development, should be the first locatIons reVIewed for mamtenance mspectIon. Carmax Sand Pme preserve B OJ Sand Pme preserve Hampton Inn. .Lake adjOlmng parcel Flowers Bakery Wetlands All projects .Roadway medlans,r.o w The plan should contmue through the normal reVIew process. kjh FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION Memorandum No. 97-232 rn @ rn n .~lLG ~\ rn , APR - 4~rT! ' LJ \ PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT. TO Tambri Heyden, Director Planning & Zoning Department FROM William D Cavanaugh, FPO I /(//-I,fI. fa l at W0-...t ~ Fire Department /?(/' ~/ I DATE Apnl 4, 1997 SUBJECT Quantum Park PID Gateway Blvd & High Ridge Rd We find we cannot accept this request at this time We especially take exception to the proposed vacating of Quantum Blvd Without any alternate routes proposed We feel that without the input of park tenants and neighbors, we would do a disservice to the citizens of Boynton to go further Experience with responses on Gateway Blvd, at peak hours, Indicates to us that more In depth information is needed before we offer comment. CC Deputy Chief Gale FPO II Campbell File '5_ @t m 0 ~ 8t~L~!'11I1T FLANNI 1I ZONING B ~ j I, I j LJ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #97-067 TO Tambn] Heyden, Planning & Zonmg Dlrec~A:;?/ Carel FIsher, Actmg PublIc Works Dlrecto~ THRU FROM. Larry QUinn, SamtatIOn Superintendent SUB] Master Plan ModIficatIOn - Quantum Park DATE Apn19,1997 orks Department has no comments m reference to the Master Plan on at Quantum Park. " nn Samtauon Supenntendent LQ/cr t~-~-lliJLL -- i !, APR \ 5 \S;jl ('~J RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #97-155 \ PLANNING Ai'll) ZONING \)EP1. TO FROM Tambri Heyden, Planing & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks superintenden~ Quantum Park RE Date April 15, 1997 The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the land development order for the Quantum Park project. The following comment is submitted There is an indication that a portion of Quantum Blvd will be blocked off eliminating the western portion of the loop road This will impact the proposed Quantum City Park. The master plan for this park includes an entrance way and parking on the south portion of the park. Due to the awkward shape of this property, parking for some of the playing fields in park is located near the southern entrance Since the shape of the property also does not allow for a through road to Miner Road, closing off a portion of Quantum Blvd will cause visitors to the park to decide in advance which fields they are going the utilize People coming from the west who are planing to use the south playing fields will be forced to drive out of their way to get to that field JW CC Charles C Frederick, Recreation and Park Director DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO 97-069 ~ .~ '00 L APR t 5 1997 Wi PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. April 14, 1997 TO I Tambn J Heyden, Plannmg & Zomng Drrec~~ Al Newbold, Actmg DIrector OfDevelopm11 QUANTUM PARK - MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION REVIEW COMMENTS FROM. RE In response to your request for Development Department comments on the above referenced Issue, please be advIsed of the followmg: Buildmg DIVISIon Assummg that the proposed zomng modIficatlons do not produce a negatIve unpact to concurrency Issues concomItant to the ongmal DRI parameters, thIS request appears to be m the best mterest ofmarketmg and developmg the remamder of the project for all partIes concerned. It should be noted however, that the traffic study as publIshed does not "appear" to address the planned school sIte development and ItS' Impact to the resultmg traffic scenano at peak tImes. AO.KH/ck attachment: Bldg. DlV Plans xc Anthony OcchlUzzo Ken Hall C:\\1y Documents\quantumparkmpmod.doc MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT NO 97 - 092 ~........_~,.... -~. \ 00 r~ @ I~." j~'" 110 ~ b ~ u j ~itii il APR I 51991 Ill: . :JL:). PLANNING AND I ZONING DEPT. TO. Tambri Heyden, Planning Dir~ \. / John A Guidry. Utilities Director ~ CUi April 14, 1997 FROM. DATE. SUBJECT Quantum Park - DR! Amendment We offer the following comments on the proposed DR! amendment for Quantum Park, including the requests for Master Plan land use designations, and the request for vacatmg portions of Quantum Boulevard so as to allow reconfiguration of parcels 6-11 and 22-31 1) The analysis submitted by Knnley Horn regarding the water and sewer nnpacts of proposed land use changes assumed a rather low intensity water and sewer usage for the commercial land use category Whereas this may have been a reasonable assumption for the Carmax SIte which was under consideration at that time the analysis was submItted, the numbers used would be much too low for more intensive uses such as restaurants The antIcipated usage for Industrial sites is also rather low, and is based upon occupancy by a warehouse-type usage, and makes no allowance for a high intensity water user (such as BGI) The analysis submitted to date only included those proposed changes along Park Ridge Boulevard A similar analysis. but with appropriately revised flow figures. will be required for the all affected lots. Sewer flows must be grouped by the lift station service area. so that we can determine if a lift station upgrade will be required. The adoption of a more generic type of land use designation, while increasmg the flexibility of marketing the park, may also establish conflicting impacts in close proXimIty (such as office uses sandwiched between two mdustrial facilities) The original concept of this park was to allocate each related usage to a dIstmct area. ThIS type of genenc designation also will reqUIre a more intensive review of each site plan so as to determine the actual impacts on the water and sewer systems, and evaluate those impacts against actual capacity m the delivery systems Staff will be required to track the demand of each parcel, so as to determine when system capacity IS reached With the original plan, adequate capaCIty factors were designed mto the system. Those factors will likely be exceeded with the implementation of widespread commercial land use Any upgrades required to the water and sewer systems due to this intensification of land use must be performed at the applicant's expense (Sec 26-28) 2) The portion of Quantum Boulevard for which the applIcant is requesting abandomnent contains water and sewer mam lInes that cannot be abandoned. The water main is part of an integral looped system serving all of the facilities on Quantum Blvd., and its dIsruption would reduce fire flow capability The gravity sewer also serves eXIsting businesses We would require, at a minimum, that an easement be dedicated over the entire right-of-way so as to assure continued access and maintenance to our system. Once the lots are reconfigured, an alternate system can be designed and constructed by the applIcant, after our approval, so as to maintain uninterrupted service to the area. Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella of this office JAG/PVM xc Skip Milor File April 14, 1997 l,rfDI ~ @ ~" n \1 -~ rnI I ~~ 11111 '1 ni" II ,JU APR r 6 !q97 j ~I 1 PLANNING AND L ZONING DEPI DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO 97-069 TO Tambn J Heyden, Planmng & Zomng DIrector FROM. Al Newbold, Actmg DIrector of Development RE QUANTUM PARK - MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION REVIEW COMMENTS In response to your request for Development Department comments on the above referenced Issue, please be adVIsed of the followmg: Buildmg DIVISIon Assummg that the proposed zomng modIficatIons do not produce a negatIve Impact to concurrency Issues concomItant to the ongmal DRI parameters, thIS request appears to be m the best mterest of marketmg and developmg the remamder of the project for all partIes concerned. It should be noted however, that the traffic study as pubhshed does not "appear" to address the planned school sIte development and ItS' unpact to the resultmg traffic scenano at peak: tunes. Engmeenng DIvISIon The rezomng of the lots abuttmg the E-4 canal from an office deSIgnatIon to hght mdustnal may well unpact the welfare of the resIdentIal communItles on the west SIde of the canal. Future vacatIng of the subject portIon of Quantum Blvd. will also reduce emergency response tImes. The future vacatmg and closmg of Quantum Blvd. per the apphcant's request will create a dead-end road from Gateway Blvd. some 2500 feet long. The maXImum allowable length of a dead-end street IS 1320 feet per Chapter 6 of the LDR (page 6-11 ) RecommendatIons. 1 ConsIder any rezonmg request and/or land consohdanon when there IS a bonafide contract purchaser, or 2. Approve the request forrezomng and future vacatmg of the subject portIOn of Quantum Blvd. subject to Quantum deedmg Lot 31 to the CIty for park purposes and the relocanng and constructIOn of Quantum Blvd. northward along the E-4 canal to mtersect Mmer Road, mcludmg buffenng along the canal. ThIS prOVIdes not only an effiCIent access to the park and Gateway Blvd., but also faster emergency response tIme. 3 ReVIse note 5 as shown on the attached plan. AO.KH/ck attachment: Bldg. DIV Plans xc Anthony OcchlUzzo Ken Hall C:\My Documents\quantumparkmpmod.doc j~ ~.88 rrofIT ~ u ~ ~ \L~ APR 2 11991 ~ Pli\NNING i\ND ZONING DEPT. Board of Supervisors C. Stanley Weaver Kermit Dell John I. Witworth III Secretary/Manager William G. Winters Assistant Manager Ronald L. Crone Attorney Perry & Schone, P.A. LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~~~J 13081 MILITARY TRAIL DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33484 Apn117, 1997 Tambn J Heyden, AICP Duector of Planning and Zomng City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, Flonda 33425-0310 Dear Ms. Heyden. Subject. Technical RevIew Committee Agenda - Apn115, 1997 The Lake Worth Dramage DIstnct offers the followmg comments regardmg the Item(s) on the meetmg agenda. 1 Quantum Park - No ObjectIOn to Amendment Request. 2 Amerope Enterpnses, Inc. at High Ridge Commerce Park PID - at 45 mIles East of High RIdge Road, thIS project wIll not be located m the L WDD Service Area. As always, we thank you for bemg gIven the OppOrtunIty to comment. Smcerely, LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ~~M Shaughn J Webb ChIef Inspector SJW"]ma c Ronald L Crone, P.E., P.L S , AssIstant Manager, LWDD Patnck A. Martm, P.E., DIstnct Engmeer, LWDD K:\DATAIJOANN\WPDOCSIHEYDEN SIW Delray Beach & Boca Raton (561) 498-5363. Boynton Beach & West Palm Beach (561) 737-3835 . Fax (561) 495-9694 Traffic AnalysIs Quantum Park Master Plan Amendment No.8 Prepared for Quantum ASSOcIates Prepared by KImley-Hom and AssOcIates, Inc March, 1997 o Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 1997 049029.01 Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Traffic Analysis Master Plan Amendment No.8 TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ INTRODUCTION SUMMARY OF CHANGES 1 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS 12 CONCLUSIONS 12 Table of Contents 04909201 \wp\mpa-8m.toc March 12, 1997 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Traffic Analysis Master Plan Amendment No.8 INTRODUCTION This report is provided in support of Quantum Park Master Plan Amendment Number 8 The Quantum Park DRI is a mixed use office/industrial/commercial development. Currently (Master Plan Amendment #7) there are specific limits on acres and square footage of various land uses. These limits are listed below' Industrial maximum square feet: Office maximum square feet: Commercial maximum acres: Commercial maximum square feet: Hotel = 268 square feet commercial 2,784,354 1,685,772 47 426,888 These maximums are to be maintained. However, land use designations on selected parcels are being changed to accommodate flexibility without the need to process unnecessary NOPCs. This study examines the effects that the Master Plan Amendment will have on traffic within the development and documents that the proposed changes will generate no additional traffic and will have no significant effect on traffic impacts. SUMMARY OF CHANGES ACCESS Master Plan Amendment No.8 allows for Quantum Boulevard to be vacated in conjunction with reconfiguration of adjacent lots 6 through 11 and 22 through 31 The vacation of Quantum Boulevard would not change the access for these parcels since they could still connect to both ends of the remaining roadway Parcels 2,3,4 and 5 would be fully served by Quantum Boulevard to Congress Avenue. The affect would be to increase traffic from these parcels on this roadway link. h:\04902901\wpVnp~.m13 1 - March 12, 1997 Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Traffic Analysis Master Plan Amendment No.8 The second group of parcels served by Quantum Boulevard, Parcels 12 - 17 and 32 - 38 would already primarily use Gateway Boulevard. A small amount of travel from parcels 12 - 15 and 32 - 35 would have accessed Congress Avenue via Quantum Boulevard. This traffic would no longer use the subject link. Thus, the increase to the west from Parcels 2 - 5 will be offset by the decrease from Parcels 12 - 15 and 32 - 36. Conversely, the increase to the south on Quantum Boulevard, from Parcels 12 - 15 and 32 - 35, will be offset by the decrease from Parcel 2 - 5 Thus, there will be no significant change in traffic demands from the vacation of the subject section of Quantum Boulevard LAND USE The proposed Master Plan Amendment Number 8 is shown in Exhibit A (located at end of report) For purposes of this analysis, similar lot designations were grouped together as shown in Exhibit A The lots were grouped based upon the land use change from the existing Master Plan Amendment Number 7 to the proposed Master Plan, shown in Exhibit B (located at end of report) Table 1 identifies the changes in land use designations for the various groups from the existing Master Plan Amendment Number 7 to the proposed Master Plan Amendment Number 8 Based on these land use changes the following conclusions can be made regarding the groupings. The designated land use changes in Groups I, V, and VIII will not cause an increase in the maximum number of trips from these groups as the change in potential land use does not include a higher trip generator than was previously approved Groups VI and VII are limited by the analysis of the intersection of Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard performed as part of Master Plan Amendment Number 6 Ordinance No 96-33 Section 2, Condition No.4 is being modified to require monitoring of trip thresholds for every site approval on Park Ridge Road (currently the DO condition only applies to changes to commercial) Therefore, the only groups which could potentially generate additional trips and impact the traffic characteristics of Quantum Park are Groups II, III and IV h:\04902901\wp\mpa-8.m 13 -2 March 12, 1997 Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Traffic Analysis Master Plan Amendment No.8 TABLE 1 LAND USE CHANGES Group Existing Master Plan Amendment Proposed Master Plan Amendment Number No. 7 Designation No.8 Designation I Office Office/Industrial (01) II Office Office/Industrial/Commercial (010 III Research & Development (R&D) Office/Industrial (01) (to be generated as light indst.) IV Office Office/Industrial/Commercial (010 V Office/Commercial Office/Industrial/Commercial (OIC) VI Industrial and Office/Industrial/Commercial (010 Industrial/Commercial VII Industrial Office/Industrial (01) VIII Office/Hotel/Commercial Office/Industrial/Commercial (010 Group II Effects An analysis was performed to determine the impact of the land use changes in Group II This analysis compares the maximum potential trip generation for the proposed land use designations in Master Plan Amendment Number 8 to trip generation for each parcel that was included as part of the approval for Master Plan Amendment Number 6 (the trip generation was not revised as part of Master Plan Amendment Number 7) Table 2 summarizes the trip generation from Master Plan Amendment Number 6 and the maximum potential trip generation based on the land use designation in Master Plan Amendment Number 8. The land use change in Master Plan Amendment Number 8 with the greatest trip generation potential on all of the parcels in Group II is from office to commercial h:\04902901\vvpVnp~.m13 3- March 12, 1997 Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Traffic Analysis Master Plan Amendment No.8 TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS Master Plan Amendment N ~.Master Plan Amendment No.8 Group Acreage land Use PM Peak land Use (Max) PM Peak Hou VarianCE Number Hour Trips 1 Trips (Max) 2 II 1742 Office 246 Comm 987 741 'PM peak hour trips established as part of Master Plan Amendment Number 6. 2PM peak hour trip rate based on ITE Trip Generation Manual 5th Edition equation for land use type 820. Assumes a floor area ratio of 0.25. Group II could cause a shift in commercial from the east portion of the property to the west portion of the property It is noted that no changes to the master plan increase project trip generation Therefore, a decrease in office in Group II will generate an increase in office use in the eastern part of the project. Similarly, an increase in commercial in Group II will be accompanied by a decrease in commercial in the east part of the project. The increase and decrease in PM peak hour trips were distributed and assigned to Gateway Boulevard to determine the level of impact of this change. The assignment pattern approved for Master Plan Amendment Number 6, and used herein is shown in Table 3 Exhibit C shows the resulting potential PM peak hour impact of the change in Group II land use. The net result of maximizing commercial in Group II is an increase of 148 trips to the west and a decrease of 148 trips to the east. This represents approximately a five percent change in project traffic in each area. Such a change is too small to not impact the operations of Gateway Boulevard It is worthy to note that this is a change to approved impacts; however, there is no change to original project impacts since commercial was originally south of the lakes in parcels 58-61 Parcels 58 - 61 have the same assignment pattern as the Group II parcels (i.e., commercial was moved east in Amendment Number 6) Therefore, the resulting impacts will be consistent with the originally approved project impacts. h:\04902901\wpVnp~.m13 4 March 12, 1997 ~~ \H '" ::: ""'" ,,::::.::: n..~ 0- 0- ~~aa g~~\~ o Ot: t; t;O -t;-t; e- e- :,;~ e4l.\"4I.\ he\ie itletl -as-as ~#.#.#.#. - QQ&l\Q &l\&l\-&&l\ .......,........""""'-' (f\ .... ~ (f\\~ 4!~61-&~ - I 1 I'" I j il I~ i ~ '" ==,,""""" --- n:- - -- ~~~~ e E\\~ ooot: t;t;t;O .,..........--c: e. e- lIDlIDlIDe 41.\41.\41.\ lID ...,41.\ tltlt;e .t;e\l -a-;-aS t&tt ....-t~.... ",,,-,"'-''''' Q .... -& -~Q _al)Q~ """ ~~ ... I ... I ... Q,~ ~ "'<A ~~ A.~ ~ c-:~ .'" u ~~ -t; _.- -lID. \k~ 1 ;, t;e .t; \.')n~ Q ~ t- ~~ d)1: U~~~ Ul"- i~~~ l~Z~ \iG t-(t Ul ~ 4. 1: -------,.-----------------. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Traffic Analysis Master Plan Amendment No.8 TABLE 3 PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT PATTERN (1986 AMENDMENn LAND USE GATEWAY BLVD. HIGH RIDGE RD. GATEWAY BLVD. EAST CORRIDOR WEST OF NORTH OF PARK OF PARK PARK OFFICE 41 9 50 INDUSTRIAL 39 11 50 COMMERCIAL 46 4 50 Modified assumotions for current studv: Use average officelindustrial 40% west; 10% north 2. For commercial on High Ridge or Park Ridge Road use 65% east and 31% west Source: Amendment #6 Traffic Study Groups III and IV Table 4 shows the Trip generation analysis for areas 1\1 and IV The increases north of the intersection of the Gateway Boulevard/High Ridge Road intersection will be off set by decreases to the west and south of the intersection. In order to evaluate the effect of those shifts, the previously approved analysis for the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road (performed for Master Plan Amendment Number 6) was updated. Exhibit D is Table 9 from the Master Plan Amendment Number 6 analysis, that has been marked up to demonstrate the shift in development. The following is a description of the shifts, and the reasoning behind the shifts. h:\04902901\wp\mpa-8.m 13 6 March 12, 1997 Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Traffic Analysis Master Plan Amendment No.8 TABLE 4 TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS Master Plan Amendment Master Plan Amendment Group Number 6 Number 8 Acreage Variance Number land Use PM Peak Land Use PM Peak Hour Hour Trips 1 (Max) T rips (Max) 2 R&D III 177 173 Office 248 75 (Indust) 586 IV 11.33 Office 247 Comm 742 'PM peak hour trips established as part of Master Plan Amendment Number 6. 2PM peak hour trip rate based on ITE Trip Generation Manual 5th Edition equation for land use type 820. Assumes a floor area ratio of 0.25. Office to Commercial To develop the maximum potential impact on the intersection, the parcels in Group IV (83, 84, and 85) were converted from office to commercial use. Although Lot 91 was designated in Master Plan Amendment Number 7 for Office/Hotel/Commercial use, it was generated in the analysis for Master Plan Amendment Number 6 as office. To maximize the impact, lot 91 was generated in this analysis as commercial The total area of the lots to the north of Gateway Boulevard which were redesignated as commercial use for this analysis (lots 83, 84, 85, and 91) is 176 acres. In addition to these changes, the trip generation was revised to reflect existing and committed development in the project. Lot 1 was converted from office to commercial, to reflect a proposed hotel that is planned for the lot. Combined these changes with the lots previously designated as commercial, the total number of commercial acres in the development would be 639 Master Plan Amendment Number 7 limits the total amount of commercial use in the development to 47 acres. h:\04902901\wp\mpa-8.m 13 7 March 12, 1997 t:; - w w - J: C ~ '" ... ;:)8 = 0 Ow z'" I- ~ ~9 w - ~ OU CQ ;:) wo "'< - -' 00 0 :c > ....... o~ >< z ... ... .... LoU ;:) to- .... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~q~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~-~ ~ ~M~NNN_____NN~~N~NN_________N~NMNM~O~~N~M.-----..-- .... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M m _N~__M . . .0 "__NVtno\M_ .0 . . . . . . -M"",...,t.D.,..,M -N_MU")_MO - . . -_0 . . ~NN___~~~_~________~_~~~~~~~_____NNO_~__NN_MM~~__~M ... ~.~M~~~~~O~M~~O_~~~~O~~~~~~~~~""M~.~O~~~-M""O""""""~~-U")"" m ~~~NNN~~~N~NNN~M~~~~N~~~~~~~NMNMN~~ciN~N~~.N6ciciciN~cid .. e~~..~MMM~M...~~""~.M.MMM~MMM~~~~U")~~O.~U")~~=~MMMMO~~M a cicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicidcicicicicicicicidciciciciciociciciddcicicicicicidcicici~cicici .. ~ i ... i: a z 0 g ... lQ ~ qC!q-f"'!~""":~ ~ ----MNOO .. ~f'W!""1,,!q~,",:~ .. z NNC""CC"'CCO\D_N .... f"!"'!~r"1"!"!~f'! .. ... 00000000 .... "''''11\''''-.0........... .. z ciooo":_od .. III ... .. z 5 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~q~~q~~~~~~~.~ 0 ~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~d~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~ .. ~ ~ ~~~o~~~~~~~o~.~~o~o.~~.~~~~o~-~~-~~o~~~~~~~c~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~N~NNNN~~~~~~~~ci~~~~~~~~~~~~~M~ ... 5 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 5 0 dddcicicicicidddcicicicicicicicicioddcidddciciddddddddcidddddoddddddd .. ... ::!: ::!: e ~ 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 dcidddciocicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicidciciciocicicidddciciciciciciddd ,: T ~ ~ ~'llI:~~~-~~ NN",NCO,...,,-N ... ... .... 0 :z: ~ 0 u lC S 0 ... 0 :J N z ~ ~ ~~_~OM~~~~~~O_~~~~~~~M~MMM~.N~M~~~O _~N..o\DO\ 0 ~~~~~N~~~~~~~NNNMN~~~~~~~~~~NNN1~7~ NriNN""M ,.".. t;; ! ~!. *~l!~~ :> 0 - ?; 5 ::\ O_NM~~~~~~O_NM~~~~~~O_NM~~~~~~~mo~~~~~M~~~ .. .. ~ _NM~~~~~m__________NN~NNNNNNNMMMMMMM~~MMM~v~~~~~~~~ ~ Z ~ Si co .. >< ~ .; 15 ~ '" :> ~ ;; .,; ~ .9 :i: - . :c IU ~ ,C ... ... 0 x: '^ ~ ::l~ U ... oS - 0 Z'^ ~ :S9 0 w :l; 01.1 ::l wo '^< - .... 00 0 ....... ~ ;:. o~ Z a: - C< ... CIQ ::l - .... :r: )( u.I E ~;: z'" o ti i1-- ~~ ~ .. X 0- o i .,,,.,,., ..rr.i~ 0- .'..., co ~ ~an'" "'- - -- "''''''' III V;....;,...; .. ::: .. ~ --r_\DOO""'......"'t'f"'I\DCOOlt\""" N_"';"":"':"":"":NN,,:,..."':r-i"": .. .. z O\U'\O'\C:OI""'\,..,Mt"'!~CJ\C"'!COM- co,.,;ui,.;...i~..o~"ui~,.,;o\..,.; 0- .. '^ anN ""'.....,..,.,.,..,..,It'\."rt'lICN.,,'" ci d ci d ci ci ci ci d ci"; ci d.o 0- .. Z CO,...., N CO......,..,...,O It\N\DCOO\ 0 "":ci--=cici"":"':r-.i"":"":,..;d":"': .. ~ -- .. z U'l~.....-<<!<<!~Gq . . . ."O\l)N.... U'lU'l.........U')V\..o.... r-..t'f"'ICOr-.COQJM.... cicico""~"ONCO NNN_V\V\\OM ~_aJOt.l\lI'lIO" .....,.u-i....;...uir-.: a..D '" cidd __U"lCOV"llnOO __"":O";..iU;o\ ~~~O_&n___O-\Dq~~.MO~~~~ ~~NNN..;-~~ci5M~:,..;~~~~ge~ ~~~~~".....~~O-~~~~~MO....~~~ ~~~__~~~~ci~~~~~~~~~~~~ "CO."....~M.....COClOO_"O\o,....,~an~,....,".....,...., ~ddddcicidcidcd~~cidciddd~co "OMOM~""'.....OOO_......O\O~.,,~<q'~""'N...... ~.MN~~~MMci~N..;~NNcicidci~~ ~O_"O......NO'\NNO~O\~~",.....O..,<q'.....~- ~,..;N..;..;...:ciM,..;ci~N~~NN~,..;~~~~ ~~~_."OO~~O~~~~~~OM~N~- ~~~~~~~~~ci~e~~~~~M~~~~ 5 o ~CJ\~"O"O~~~~~~\D~~~~~~~~~~~~OOO~~~~~~~~~~OO-OO~~ocoooc~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~cicio~~~~~~~~~~oci~cici~~ciddcidd~ q"",,,,, .... . . "'....'" .. .... on ~N~ co~'" .. .... .... .nd"": "'11nC't. .... . . ~"'.. ~"t"oI ;:;~vi -"'''' cr\cio\ "'-~ ~ ~N~O_.~.~N~OC~~~~~~~q~~_ooO~~~~CN_N__CONOO~~OOOCCC~ ~~MN~~M~~~~~~N~~~~~~=e~~ddd~~~~..MN~~oci~cici~~cidddcio~ ccoooococOOOOOOOOOOOOOCO~~~OOOOOOOOOOO~O~~OO~~~~~~O ddciciciciciciciciciciciciocicicicicidciciciEE;dcidciciciciciddci~ci~~oci~e~~;~ci __5 <0 o 0< i Ji o Vi!:: ~qqqqqqqqqqqqq~~qqqqq~q~~~~qqq~~~~qqqq~~~~~~~d~~~:q OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~~~OOOOOOOOOOO~O~~OO____~NO ...: ;: ... ~ ... ~ 0- o :t: :i. Ji o V ... Sc Coli ~O< ~ ~ o :;; => c i!:: _N~O'\_""In"''''''''MO\NN NN_ciN"':":',...;~_~ciN-= -- tl 0< < .. ~ -.. M,..)"'; ., co MM .. ..; t I qOCOO\a)CO.o U"I - - - . . . U\t"lLl"J""<q"\o~ co.. NN ..... ........ vi ~N oan_ChNO'\ MNooiM"'=iui r:1I'! "'~ l' , " '-0 Ul 0\0 ~""'-:N "'''' MM '" 00 ~ MM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~""'Ul.o~~~O_NM.~m~~~~~~C'\O_N~~~an~~~Q\~_N~ ...,.....,....,...,.~..,...,....,.""U"I~In~~""U"IU"IU"IU"IIn~~~~~~~~\O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CO~~~ ~ .. ~ ..; 0 ..... '" 0 .,.; a- d '" ..; ~ ..; o ~ '" => ~ ~ (; .,; ~ 9 :i: ~ ~ .... ... ~ ... ..- .... .... ,..; <D .... ~ '" ..- ..- <:> ..- '" ,..; ... .,; ... .... .... ... ~ d ~ ~ '" .... ... 0\C'~~-~f'-:."'1 <D <:> <D ... ri";""__I"'<<i.,D~ ,;, d ,;, ~ .... <:> ~ ... ..i .... '" NO 0 ('f\O ('t'Icr:.q C! '" ..o~":'ci~~"- "'l ,;, ~ r-...~--- _,.r\r'\ .... ..- <D .... ~ d ~ ... ...o.""'f""\<t"'\~~a-. <:> ... ~ t4'l~"';rl':'McO~ ... ci- ~ ~ ..- ... ... ... ... ~ ... ~......MO'\\r\oD....t:D <:> ... ~~i;~,.;~!;t~ ... ,;, ..i ... ?~ ';: <:> <D .... '" 5 6 '" '" ~... ci- ~ ...~ ... <D ~ <D "! "! ~ ..- ;;. ~ ... a- '" ..- ..- i 6 ~ <D ... ... ... .0 .0 .. ..- ..- z ... ... ... ... ~ .0 .0 e ... ... '" '" ..- ..- ~ ..- ;;; <D Z ... ... 6 ... .... oil .... S 5 ce..t>r.n.....coort'!,c:r:'!."'1 ..i ..i ~d....:t..f..n..n('f\..,." <:> <:> U a- a- S. 0 "'lI'<C"t-4-.M-or-'\<S''' ... ... 0 ~ ~ '0 .... .... ... ~"!...."!~"!~';; ,..; ,..; ~ <D <D ................rt\l\-- .... ... .... .... ...5 ~~~~~~q~C! ,;, ,;, ~ .... <0 Qo.OO'OooO'O' ';: ~ ..- .... :f; .... ,;, 0 C!C!C!C!C!C!C!C!C! ,;, "'~ ~ ... 00000000.0 ..- ..- ..- ti '" '" ~ ci- ~ ... ;;I ... .... '0 .,; .,; :c i ... .... ... ... " I ... ... e \II ... ... ~o ~-.-:cq~::' ... ... 0" ",-":':'''-~''-I ... ... ~~ ~~\~1 \ 1\'2 ..- ..- ~ .... .... ~ ~ 0 t& ~ ..- ci- a- 0 ('l GnJ ~ ~ c' ::! ~~ :,~~,;;;~~~~a. ~ " "," j.~ \ \ ~~ <J ~z " ""':' "'0 ~ S ~ ... 8 ~ oil ~ ::l 0 .;;;;; 0 3 - 3: - ~ ~ 0 - 3 0 - 0 ... '= ... ~ ~ ... c:Q ::> - .... ~ UJ .. '5 "' % .c. "' ~ 3: ~ ~ b~ ~~ ...'" ...;~ '05 ..."' 5~ "'.. ~1i -:>'5 a> .., a-C o~ ,.2 z!! -\! ~~ ..,- i~ ~~ 'tl~ ....~ ai~ .. ~~~ ~~~ 81::10.... -t!'" ~toI.2 ..,-'!!t ~~Ct cc:.~C "' Cl. 0 ~~~ ~~~:Z ~~ ..;; Cl. "- "'0",,05 v ~ %~~~-; ~~~~~ ~ aU""*" , oc~lV\ _~ft$""6J' ~~~b~ -o......CC/orQco ~~~~~ ~~~::.--:. ~.!!-s.s '5 .~ _...... 0'\ (t\. _ 0..""" V\ '^ ~.~7. _..u E~~ ~, =====- _N~ ~ o -" -~-~_.._~~----------- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park Traffic Analysis Master Plan Amendment No.8 Therefore, 169 acres needed to be shifted from commercial to office, elsewhere in the development. Based upon a reasonable estimate of where commercial development was most likely to occur, lots 62, 72, 73B, 74, and 81 were converted from commercial to office to compensate for this shift. Industrial To Office To further develop the maximum potential impact in the intersection, the parcels in Group III (86, 87, 88, 89B and 90B) were converted from industrial to office. Through discussions with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, it was determined that R&D should be treated as industrial for trip generation purposes. Other Changes In addition to the changes in Groups III and IV, the following changes were also made. The noted change to office from industrial is offset by the proposed industrial development planned on lots 32,33, 34A, 35, 36, 37, and 38. These lots were previously analyzed as office. Lots 89A and 90A were converted from R&D to industrial to reflect existing development, and lots 68A and 68B were converted from R&D to industrial as agreed upon previously As part of Master Plan Amendment Number 7, it was decided that the designation "hotel" should be treated as commercial from a trip generation standpoint. The remaining two lots that had been previously generated as hotel were 65A, and 65B These lots however could not be changed to commercial for the purposes of this analysis, as all the commercial acreage had been used Therefore, the next highest potential traffic generator allowable on the sites (office) was used To compensate for this increase in office on lots 65A and 65B, lots 39 and 40A were changed from office to industrial h:\04902901\wp\mpa-8.m 13 11 March 12, 1997 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Quantum Park T raffle Analysis Master Plan Amendment No.8 Lot 40 which was previously designated as office was actually split into two lots, 40A which became industrial, and 40 which was changed to institutional to reflect proposed development. Lots 41 A, 53, and 54 were also changed to institutional from their previous designation as R&D to reflect this proposed development. The resulting trip generation of these shifts in land use can be seen in Exhibit E Exhibit E is the same spreadsheet as previously approved for Amendment Number 6. The noted land use changes were made for each parcel and the commercial trips were held to the previous analysis level since no increase in commercial square footage is proposed INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Based on the turning movement volumes determined in Exhibit E, an analysis was performed to determine if the intersection will operate at an acceptable level of service at full build out with required improvements. The analysis is attached as Exhibit F and demonstrates that the intersection will operate at an acceptable Level-Of-Service "D" CONCLUSIONS It is concluded that the proposed land use and access flexibility will have no significant effect on traffic impacts from Quantum Park. Further, improvements imposed at the intersection of Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard will continue to provide a good level of service even with a maximum shift in commercial and office development to north of the intersection -12 - March 12, 1997 h:\04902901\wp\mpa-8.m 13 .. ~ .. lB .... lB "' .. II> "' ~ '" z "' ~o: Z II> 0 g lQ.... i ~ "' .. z .. el .. .. z "' - lB - U.I tu - - '" '" .... ::E: .. ~ '" z ~ ::l~ '" oS - 0 z'" = ~ :59 5 '" OU - " 0 :I: ::l "'0 "' "'< .... 00 ~ 0 >< > L", 0 o~ z '" U.I '" L ~ ::l .... ....5 ~o "' ~ 0 u~ ~ ~~MO~~~~~~.O_~~~~.O~~.~....~M-.N~N~O. ~~ .~....~~N_ ~ t;;"';~NNN . . . "_NNNNNMNN"':' .____....:N,..;NMN~<o:tc::iN.NN~N 'N---"':-.i~- 0 ~ .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~O~~M~~mM~~~~~~~~ ~~~-~~m~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~d~~m~~~~~"';"';"';"';~~N ~.~M.~~~~O~M.~o_m~Mmo~m~~~~~~~~.o-.o~omNONMN~~~~.-~ ...NNM"':"':"':M"':NNN,..;M"';NN"':r.i . O"':"':"':"':"':NMNNr-.iroiroio "roi"':NM"': " "ocioor-.ir-.ici ~=~~~~MMM~~~~~~~~~~~~~MMM~~M~~~~~~~O~=~~=~M~M~MMO=~ ~cicicicicidocicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicicidcicicicidcicicicicidci~dci OOO-~=~ " . . _ roi N ci M~~I.OOO\~ NNNNcO..c ~~~~I.OI.O dcicic:ic::idc:i ~U"'Iananl.O"M dddd "_d o .~~~~~~~~~~~~~q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~q~~~~~~~~~~~ c:i;~~~~~~~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~M~c:i~g~~g~~ ~~~~cO O=~O~~~~~I.O~ON~M~O~O~I.O~.~~~~OI.O-~M~~OO~-O~-=~====~~~1.O ci~~~~.MMMMr-.i~~~~~~~~MroiNMNNNNM.~~~~~~c:i~a:)~~~~M~~~~~~!"'; '"' ~q~qq~~~~~qqqqqqqqqqqq~qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ~oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo '"' ~qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ~oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ..: ~ ~ .... 6 :J: :i. '" :E 8 ,.; ." ~Q ~= ~ ... ~ ~ .... ... ~<w:t..,.<w:t"""N-= NNNNNcOf'o... " ~_O\OMI.OI.OI.O~M~O_U"'I~MMO\I.O~MI.OMMM~~NO\M roi~"':NN " " . " . "NNNN"';N"':"':"':"':"':"':"':~"':-NNN ... " ~ o > z '" ::J ~ ;; '" ~ ... 9 i co~~o \ONI.O...o ~ NNroi~ N"';NNroi .... tJ "' ~ _NM~U"'II.O~COO\O-N~.U"'I~~~~O-NM~~~~CO~O NM~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~MV~ __________NNNNNNNNNNMMMM~MMMMMMM~~.~~~~....,. "' el "' ~ ~ ;;).... .. .. z '" 0 6 ill .... ~ ~ ~ "' .. z .. .. '" ...-.. .. ""C .. z - ...... c "' 0 lB U .... - '" '" '" .... ::E: .. - ~ '" z - ::l~ U.I '" oS - 0 z'" - ~ :59 ~ '" OU 5 " 0 ::l "'0 "' - "'< .... 00 ~ = 0 > L", .. o~ 0 - z '" :I: '" L ~ ::l .... >< U.I .. ....;;) :s 0 u "' ~ ::11 0 u~ i .... .. lB ...., ...; .... lB " c::i ...., c::i O"l.......-"'O 0 O.....................M"OCOQ In. ON- . . . . .NN~~..:N- NO\tnO\aoMf"l"'lMt"'!"'ItO\~COM- NoOMv\MMIoCi~~.......uoi~Ma;ui NLnNMNNMMtnI.l'lMON&nM cicicic:ic:ic::idcic:icici-=c:icici ...CC.......NCO.......MMOtnN\OCCO'lO c:i .O....:c:ic:i...:...:N....:...:fI"10...: . '" ""<l -.iMM ~t'4N '" . . ","'''' "'..,.., u-i"": . I.I')"'N_M~~O . . . . . 0\ "'It . I.Illn..........M"lI'lnM .......M"ONU"'l"'ltN....... cicicitticca\~1.!:i NN"'It__"'If'tn_ O.......OMM ~.cciMfI"1-.i.q:M "'..,.., cicici __...CC.......OM\C ___oci-.:;.ci ... ~ S o U"'ICO"'OO-........ _oCO\C...CO.....MO...~...~ NMNNNN...:~.ciuiM_NMMOO~~O~~ ~~~~~O\M~~O~~CC .~~MO""~~~ ~~~~~cc~~~ci~~~"'ONNOO~~~~~ U"'ICOU"'i.......tnMCOCOON.......M..o..............tn..................O"lU"'l ciciddcicicicicici"':cicicicicicicicicici~ O"lMOM...COMOOO"'O......."ONLnlnl.l'l.................Oln N.MNN"':"':MMO..DN'MNNOc:iciciui" OO_"O.......O\...NNO"'OO\-M..............OM...NU"'I~ NMN . . ._MMc:i~N_NNN.Mu-iuiM~ ~~~_tn__~~O~~N~~~OM...N~~ -~~a\m.......u-i~~ci~~..D~~~.Mu-iu-i~~ ~~O\~...o..o~~~~~~..o~~~~~~~~~~-~qoo~~~~~~~~~~o~-~~~~oooo~o ~..D~~..D~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~cici~~~~~~~~~gci~~~~~~cicioci~ci q.1.n " . . ",""'''' ...."'" ~N"': "'~'" ...."...., u-ici"': f'I1U"'lO'\ " . . ~"'.... "'!.......N ~N..n ~"'''' a\Oa\ "'~~ ~.......NNO_...~N.......OO.......~U"'lI.n~=~q~f'I1_I.nOOO'\_~MON.......~_ O~N"""''''''''~~OOooO'\o ~..,:NMNNM~u-i..,:MmN..nN~~~~~~~~~~~cici~u-i~~..,:..,:..,:M~~o~~Nu-i~~cicioo~o OOOOOOOCOOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOO~:COOCOOOOOOOOOOOOO~~~~O~ oocicicioociciocicicidcicidciciddociddd~~dddciocicicidocicicicicicici~~~~ci~ OCOOOCCCOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOOOO~:OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~~~~O~ ocicicidcicicicicidcicicicicicicicidcicicicicici~~cicidcicicidcicicicicicicicicici~O~~ci~ ...: ~ .., ~ N .... ~ .. 0 x ~ ::11 0 u ; ;;) Q ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 -N~O'\ LOlO........~MO'\NN NN_c:iN...:....:N~_~ciN . .... u "' : ..,.., MM .... -i co ~ M ~.... MM OtO_O"I 0"1 MN"':M u-i qo~O'\~ to . . " . Lt"'IMI.n~~ '" ...; co.~Lt"'lO"IO NNMN"':N ~ M....... Lt"'I "N '" -i ... "" ~ o > z '" ~ o '" ~ ... 5' I "''''''' N"":MM 00 t"'it"'i '" ...; ffi~~~~~~~~O'\~~~~~NM~~~~~~O_NM~~~~~~~~~~O-N~~~~~~~~~-N ..~~~~~.~~Lt"'lLt"'lI.nI.nI.nLt"'lLt"'lLt"'lLt"'lLt"'lLOLOI.n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"""'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''cococo will === <-' o. <-' ~~ ~ - ...; ~ .... 0 oD'" '" oD'" .. - <-' oD 0 oD ... ..; i <1''''' .j, <-' ;;. ..o~ '" '" oD'" '" - .... .,DcO~...c....c.".~~~ '" 0 '" .... "."!~...-i....-,,,""-:t ,...: 0 ,...: CO .... 0 III "," <-' - .. J:)"t""\co~--"'.~ .... C< .... .. ..",~~i~.j,i~s::t ...; - -i .... -;:. '" " ~. <-' .. "'\l'\.tf\OM.t"f'l~ <:> <:> <:> i o...;.,;...;...-io...-i .j, ~ .,; ...... ~ ~ '" CO <-' <-' .. \a ..:$'.........."".s:>a-.C\~~ <:> <:> C< gi~~"":~~~~ ,...: -i - '" <:> oD '" <-' '" ~ ~ '" '" -i -i ~~ CO "" <-' <-' ~ ~ '" ci> .. '" ... ! ... oD oD '" '" " -i -i '" '" '" '" .. ,...: ,...: s: <:> ~ - .... .... .. .,; .,; .. .. III - - <'\ <'\ -' .... .... oD ~ ..s:> '" '" e <-' '" .... s % .cO~~~~~O ~ ~ u ~~~~~::;;~..\::.~o .... .... s. <-' <-' fS ~ ~ 0 .... .... <:><:><:><:>~",_...""<'c\C< ~ <f, ~ <-' ooo",,:S:.j,-i""~"<:> ..s:> '" '" """,,,, - ..; ..; 7i% . . '0000000" <;! <;! ~;:~ooooooo~ - - ra --- i '" '" ~ ~"!<'\<:><:><:>oo<:>o;:' ..; ..; e ~ <;! <-' ~;:~ooooooo~ - --- - - t: ';:: ..., ~ .. . ~ <:> <:> i 0 0 i - - ~~'"'*: '" ..... .... ~ .j, .. ... e ..",,,, III <:> a '5~ 0 0 ~.. ~ "! "! ~ ",-- 0 <-' - - ~"'....; -i ... <;! <;! '5 .. .. ~ ~ <-' .,; on ::> <f, -;:. -;:. " - ~ ill 0 ':t ...fS ",.."'oD,;;;~~*~ga. \ ~ ~~ i \ ...::> cO cO to co c:oco~ ...~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ... '" - i ? UJ 0 0 3 ... ~ - ~ t: e 3 '" 0 0 ~ CC ... -- ~ ... ~ ? ... \JJ ~ ::l OJ % .t:. ~ 3' ~ \;; ~ ,~ v - ",0- ~~ -'" ..;>- OJ I -S I-OJ 5~ ~~ ~~ oo.s "'c: 0": IS. z!! -\! ~ ~ o as 00 co .D .... ... '" "'& ~ OJ ;;; ~ OJ \;; ::l g 1 OJ -S ~ .~ ~ ~ >- ,. c: '" ~ ::l o ';; ~ 0- S "& ~ OJ \;; ~ ,. .~ OJ ~~ ~ -g ~ ~ "'''' oD ~% ci ~1l ~ .... "" OJ aiPE . ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ E "OOVl < ~~~ ~ -o~~ a: "'0 OJ 0- OJ IX.~C ~ tU 0... 0 <<. ~ ~"'& ~ ~'~~ ~ ~~ '" ~ ..9- v 0 ",&"':ov"'-'; o..:a ~~~ t ..2 <<a E.OOM"'O ~\-'-~~~ ~%~"CI",.R Sj~~~~ ",&o<~VOJ ~-s~'1A:~ a..~..c<o,..;"'" :-s!?~=~ ~",,2.--- ~~-s.S5~ 'S o..~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~~ ~ ~~~ .g- ~l-a.. \- Vi ~ z _Nro-; -<i - ------.-.-- ...----------------- EXHIBIT "F" HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4d 03-14-1997 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Streets (E-W) Gateway Analyst KLF Area Type Other Comment Stage 3 Improvements (N-S) High Ridge File Name' ANAL-2 HC9 3-12-97 PM Peak - Master Plan Amendment No. 8 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound 1 L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1---- ---- ----1---- ---- ----1---- ---- ----1---- ---- No Lanes I 2 4 1 I 2 3 1 I 2 1 2 I 2 1 1 Volumes I 408 2319 1461 285 2013 4851 367 108 6501 567 35 435 Lane W (ft)112 0 12 0 12 0112 0 12 0 12 0112 0 12 0 12 0112 0 12 0 12 0 RTOR Vols 1 35l 351 351 35 Lost Time 13 00 3 00 3 0013 00 3 00 3 0013 00 3 00 3 0013 00 3 00 3 00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left * INB Left * Thru * 1 Thru * Right * 1 Right * Peds 1 Peds WB Left * ISB Left * * Thru * 1 Thru * * Right * 1 Right * * Peds I Peds NB Right * IEB Right * SB Right * IWB Right * Green 26.0A 64 OA I Green 28 OA 50A110A Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 IYellow/AR 4 0 o 0 4 0 Cycle Length 150 sees Phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6 #7 Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat vie g/C Approach Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ------- EB L 637 3539 o 694 o 180 39 5 D 26 9 D T 3229 7451 o 832 o 433 25 7 D R 1024 1583 o 114 o 647 6 5 B WB L 637 3539 o 485 o 180 36 2 D 31 0 D T 2421 5588 o 963 o 433 34 8 D R 1024 1583 o 463 o 647 89 B NB L 684 3539 o 582 o 193 36 5 D 38 8 D T 149 1863 o 765 o 080 574 E R 887 3167 o 824 o 280 37 1 D SB L 802 3539 o 767 o 227 38 2 D 39 0 D T 211 1863 o 175 o 113 38 9 D R 496 1583 o 849 o 313 40 2 E Intersection Delay = 31.6 seclveh Intersection LOS = D Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9 0 see Critical v/c(x) = 0 874 -----------------------------------------------------------------------