APPLICATION
~ ~ ~ ~ G ~1 ~ ill
APR I 1 1996
PLANNING ANI)
"iONING DEPT.
SHUTTS & BOWEN
A TIORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS A r LA \V
(A P.\RT'\'ERSJ-liP Ii\(LL 11'\G PROFESSIONAL A~SOCIA TIO'JSJ
20 l\ORIH ORA'JGE AVENlT
SUITE 1000
ORLA'JDO FLORIDA 32801
TELEPHO,E (4071 423 3200
FACS,MILE (40 425-8316
April 16, 1996
via FEDERAL EXPRESS
Ms Tambri Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Re Rezoning of Lots 80, 81 and 82 of Quantum Park
Dear Tambri
Pursuant to our discussion in your office last Thursday,
please find enclosed the following
lOne (1) original and one ( 1) copy of the completed
Rezoning Application and supporting materials
2 Check to the City of Boynton Beach in the amount of
$1,500 from Quantum Associates representing the rezoning
application fee
As can be seen from the enclosed Tax Appraiser's map, there is
no owner other than Quantum Associates within 400 feet of the
subject property
With respect to Section 2(h) of the Application, I have
enclosed a copy of the recent Kimley-Horn Intersection Analysis of
High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard This is the same analysis
that has been performed and will be submitted as part of the
Notification of Proposed Change to the Quantum DRI We do not
believe there will be any further impacts created by this rezoning
since all of the land use types will still be subject to specific
use approval by the Planning and Development Board regardless of
whether the land was zoned peD or PID
AMSTERDAM OFFICE
EUROPA BOCLEVARD 59
1083 AD A\,1STERDAM,
THE :-';ETHERLA~DS
TELEPHOf\;E 011 3120-661-0969
FACSIMILE 011 ~ 120-642 i475
KEY LARGO OFFICE
oeEAt-.. REEF elL'B
31 OCEA:"J REEF DRI\T
SUiTE A206.
OCEA~ R:::EF PLAZA
KEY LA.RGO, FLOR!DA 33037
TELEPHO:-JE (3051367-2831
LO\1DO~ OFFICE
48 \!OlJ'JT STREET
LOKDO'\" \\flY 5RE E:;-JGLA.:-JD
TELEPHO'JE 011-44171-493-4840
FACS!MILE 011-44171-493-4299
MIA~lI OFFICE
1500 MJA"lI CE;-.JT!::R
201 SOUTH BlseA YKE BOULEVARD
MIAMI. FLORIDA 33131
MIA!\11 (3C51358 5300
BROWARDt305) 467-R,841
FACSIMILE (305J 381-9982
WEST PALM BEACH OFFICE
Oi':E CLEAR LAKE CENTRE. SUITE 500
250 AUSTRAUAi': AVEi':UE SOUTH
WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33401
MAILI~G ADDRESS POBOX 3555
\VEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33402 3555
TELEPHONE (407) 835-8500
FACSIMILE f407) 650-8530
Ms Tambri Heyden
April 16, 1996
Page 2
Please confirm that this rezoning will be considered by the
Planning and Development Commission at its public hearing on May
14, 1996
JGW/smw
cc Steven E Fivel, Esquire
James D Thornton, Esquire
Steve Godfrey
Rocky Biby
ORL9516738.1 SMW
1 08 43 45 16 33 000 0651
Quantum Associates
c/o Eve Beckman
POBox 6120
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6120
2 08 43 45 16 33 000 0652
Quantum Associates
c/o Eve Beckman
POBox 6120
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6120
3 08 43 45 16 33 000 0671
Quantum Associates
c/o Eve Beckman
POBox 6120
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6120
4 08 43 45 16 33 000 0672
Quantum Associates
c/o Eve Beckman
POBox 6120
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6120
5 08 43 45 16 33 000 0673
Quantum Associates
c/o Eve Beckman
POBox 6120
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6120
6 08 43 45 16 33 000 0682
Quantum Associates
c/o Eve Beckman
POBox 6120
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6120
7 08 43 45 16 33 000 0690
Quantum Associates
c/o Eve Beckman
POBox 6120
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6120
8 08 43 45 16 33 000 0700
Quantum Associates
c/o Eve Beckman
POBox 6120
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6120
9 08 43 45 16 33 000 0681
Quantum Associates
c/o Eve Beckman
POBox 6120
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6120
10 08 43 45 i6 32 000 00911
Quantum Associates
c/o Eve Beckman
POBox 6120
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6120
11 08 43 45 16 32 000 0850
Quantum Associates
c/o Eve Beckman
POBox 6120
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6120
12 08 43 45 16 31 000 0790
Quantum Associates
c/o Eve Beckman
POBox 6120
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6120
13 08 43 45 16 31 000 0780
Quantum Associates
c/o Eve Beckman
POBox 6120
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6120
ORL95 16598.1 CEJ
-2-
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICATION
This application must be filled out completely and accurately and
submitted, together with the materials listed in Section II
below, in two (2) copies to the Planning Department. Incomplete
applications will not be processed.
Please Print Legibly or Type All Information
I GENERAL INFORMATION
1.
Project Name:
Quantum Park
2. Type of Application (check one)
x
a
Rezoning only
b. Land Use Amendment Only
c.
Land Use Amendment and Rezoning
v
3. Date this application is accepted (to be filled out by
Planning Department)
4 Applicant'S Name (person or business entity in whose
name this application is made)
Quantum Associates Attn
Steven E Fivel, Esq
Address
115 W Washington Street
Indianapolis, Indiana
46204
(Zip Code)
317/263-7038
Phone
317/263-7936
FAX
5 Agent's Name (person, if any, representing applicant)
James G willard, Esquire
Address
20 N. Orange Avenue - Suite 1000
Orlando, Florida 32801
Phone:
407/423-3200
(Zip Code)
FAX: 407/425-8316
6. Property OWner's (or Trustee's) Name
Same as Applicant
Address
(Zip Code)
FAX
PLANNING DEPARTMENT - APRIL 1991
A LandUse
(2)
7. Correspondence Address (if different than applicant or
agent):
Same as Agent
-This is ~he address ~o which all agendas, 1e~ters, and
other materials will be mailed.
8. What is the applicant's interest in the subject parcel:
(OWner, Buyer, Lessee, Builder, Developer, Contract
Purchaser, etc.)
Owner
9. Street Address or Location of Subject Parcel: Southeast
quadrant of Gateway Boulevard and Park Ridqe Road
10
Legal Description of Subject Parcel:
82 as per the plat of P C D Center, Plat Book 60,
Lots 80, 81 and
Pages 106 and 107, Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida
11 Area of Subject Parcel (to the nearest hundredth
(1/100) of an acre): 13 9333 acres
12
Current Zoning District
P C D
13
Proposed Zoning District:
P I D
14
15
Current Land Use Category:
Commercial
Proposed Land Use Category
Commercial/Industrial
16 Intended Use of Subject Parcel: Commercial/Industrial
17
Developer or Builder:
Quantum Associates
Architect
N/A
18.
19
Landscape Architect
N/A
20 Site Planner: N/A
21 Civil Engineer Kimley-Horn Associates, Inc
22 Traffic Engineer Kimley-Horn Associates, Inc
23
Surveyor
N/A
PLANNING DEPARTMENT - APRIL 1991
A LandUse
II. MATERIALS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
(3 )
The following materials shall be submitted in two (2)
copies, unless otherwise indicated
(check)
x
a.
This application form.
A copy of the last recorded warranty deed.
x
b.
c. The following documents and letters of consent:
(1)
If the property is under joint or several
ownership: a written consent to the application by
all owners of record,
( 2 )
If the applicant is a contract purchaser: a copy
of the purchase contract and written consent of
the owner and seller, and
_ (3)
If the applicant is represented by an authorized
agent: a copy of the agency agreement, or written
consent of the applicant, and
( 4 )
If the applicant is a lessee: a copy of the lease
agreement, and the written consent of the owner,
and
If the applicant is a corporation or other
business entity the name of the officer or person
responsible for the application, and written proof
that said person has the delegated authority to
represent the corporation or other business
entity, or in lieu thereof, written proof that he
is in fact an officer of the corporation
x d * A sealed boundary survey of the subj ect parcel by a
surveyor registered in the State of Florida, dated not
more than six (6) months prior to the date of submission
of the application, at a scale prescribed by the
Planning Department, and containing the following
information *See attached copies of P C D Center Plat
( 5)
(1) An accurate legal description of the subject
parcel
(2) A computation of the total acreage of the subject
parcel to the nearest hundredth (1/100) of an
acre.
(3) A tree survey, which conforms to the requirements
of the City of Boynton Beach Tree Preservation
Ordinance. (Also refer to Page 6, Sec. II h.(12)
of this application if property is occupied by
native vegetation.) This requirement may be
waived by the Planning Director where found to be
unrelated to the land use or zoning issues
involved with the application.
N/A e
A complete certified list of all property owners,
mailing addresses, and legal descriptions for all
properties within at least four hundred (400) feet of
the subject parcel as recorded in the latest official
tax rolls in the county courthouse shall be furnished
by the applicant Postage, and mailing labels or
addressed envelopes must also be provided Said list
shall be accompanied by an affidavit stating that to
the best of the applicant's knowledge said list is
complete and accurate Notification of surrounding
property owners will be done by the City of Boynton
Beach
PLANNING DEPARTMENT - APRIL 1991
A: LandUse
(4 )
A copy of the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's
maps showing all of the properties referred to in
paragraph e. above, and their relation to the subject
parcel.
x f.
A statement by the applicant justifying the zoning
requested, including reasons why the property is
unsuitable for development under the existing zoning
and more suitable for development under the proposed
zoning
N/A g.
A comparison of the impacts that would be created by
development under the proposed zoning, with the impacts
that would be oreated by development under the existing
zoning, which will include:
N/A h.
(1) A comparison of the potential square footage or
number and type of dwelling units under the
existing zoning with that which would be allowed
under the proposed zoning or development.
(2) A statement of the uses that would be allowed in
the proposed zoning or development, and any
particular uses that would be excluded.
(3) Proposed timing and phasing of the development
(4) For proposed zoning of property to commercial or
industrial districts, where the area of the
subject parcel exceeds one (1) acre, projections
for the number of employees.
(5) A comparison of traffic which would be generated
under the proposed zoning or development, with the
traffic that would be generated under the current
zoning; also, an analysis of traffic movements at
the intersections of driveways that would serve
the property and surrounding roadways, and
improvements that would be necessary to
accommodate such traffic movements. For projects
that generate more than five hundred (500) net
trips per day, a traffic impact analysis must be
submitted which complies with the Municipal
Implementation Ordinance of the Palm Beach County
Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance.
*Enclosed is a copy of ( a )
the traffic analvsis of
Hiqh Ridqe Road and Gateway
Boulevard intersection
prenarec1 bv Kirnley-Horn
and Associates, Inc dated
APril 9, 1996
(b)
For projects that generate two thousand
(2,000) or more net trips per day, the
traffic impact analysis must be submitted to
the City at least 30 days prior to the
deadline for land use amendment and/or
rezoning, in order to allow for timely
processing of the application and review by
the City's traffic consultant and Palm Beach
County The applicant shall be billed for
the cost of review by the City's traffic
consultant.
For projects that generate between five
hundred (500) and two thousand (2,000) net
trips per day, the traffic impact analysis
must be submitted at the application deadline
for land use amendment and/or rezoning, in
order to allow for timely processing of the
application and review by Palm Beach County
PLANNING DEPARTMENT - APRIL 1991
A LandUse
( 5 )
However, if it is the desire of the applicant
to utilize the City's traffic consultant for
review of the traffic impact analysis prior
to review by Palm Beach County, then the
procedure and requirements outlined under
item "a" above shall be followed.
NOTE:
Failure to submit traffic impact analysis in the manner
prescribed above may delay approval of the application.
(6) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
of the water demand for development under the
proposed zoning or development with water demand
under the existing zoning. Water demand ahall be
estimated using the standards adopted by the Palm
Beach County Health Department for estimating such
demand, unless different standards are justified
by a registered engineer. Commitment to the
provision of improvements to the water system
shall also be included, where existing facilities
would be inadequate to serve development under
the proposed zoning.
(7) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison
of sewage flows that would be generated under the
proposed zoning or development with that which
would be generated under the existing zoning.
Sewage flows shall be estimated using the
standards adopted by the Palm Beach County Health
Department for estimating such flows, unless
different standards are justified by a registered
engineer. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the sewage collection system shall
also be included, where the existing facilities
would be inadequate to serve development under the
proposed zoning.
(8) For proposed residential developments larger than
one (1) acre, a comparison of the projected
population under the proposed zoning or
development with the projected population under
the existing zoning. Population projections
according to age groups for the proposed
development shall be required where more than
fifty (50) dwellings, or 50 sleeping rooms in the
case of group housing, would be allowed under the
proposed zoning.
(9) At the request of the Planning Department,
Planning and Zoning Board, or City Commission, the
applicant shall also submit proposals for
minimizing land use conflicts with surrounding
properties The applicant shall provide a summary
of the nuisances and hazards associated with
development under the proposed zoning, as well as
proposals for mitigation of such nuisances and
hazards. Such summary shall also include, where
applicable, exclusion of particular uses,
limitations on hours of operation, proposed
location of loading areas, dumpsters, and
mechanical equipment, screening of service areas
and mechanical equipment, location of driveways
and service entrance, and specifications for site
PLANNING DEPARTMENT - APRIL 1991
A:LandUse
(
( 6 )
lighting. Nuisances and hazards shall be abated
or mitigated so as to conform to the performance
standards contained in the City's zoning
regulations and the standards contained in the
City's noise control ordinance. Also, statements
concerning the height, orientation, and bulk of
structures, setbacks from property lines, and
measures for screening and buffering the proposed
development shall be provided. At the request of
the Planning and Zoning Board or City Commission,
the applicant shall also state the type of
construction and architectural styles that will be
employed in the proposed development.
(10) At the request of the Planning Department,
Planning and Zoning Board, or City Commission, the
applicant shall also submit the following
information
(a) Official soil conservation service
classification by soil associations and all
areas subject to inundation and high ground
water levels.
(b) Existing and proposed grade elevations.
(c) Existing or proposed water bodies
(d) Form of ownership and form of organization to
maintain common spaces and recreation
facilities.
(e) A written commitment to the provision of all
necessary facilities for storm drainage,
water supply, sewage collection and
treatment, solid waste disposal, hazardous
waste disposal, fire protection, easements or
rights-of-way, roadways, recreation and park
areas, school sites, and other pUblic
improvements or dedications as may be
required
(11) For rezonings to planned zoning districts, the
specific requirements for submission of
applications for rezoning to such districts shall
also be satisfied Furthermore, all materials
required for a subdivision master plan shall also
be submitted
(12) Where conformance with the County's
Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance is
required, an Application for Alteration of
Environmentally Sensitive Lands (Environmental
Impact Study) must be submitted to the Palm Beach
County Department of Environmental Resources
Management (copy to City) prior to or concurrent
with the submittal of the Land Use Amendment and/
or Rezoning Application to the City.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT - APRIL 1991
A: LandUse
(7)
III. APPLICATION FEBS. Fe.. ahall be paid at ~. time that the
application 1. .Ubm1tte4, according to the f... which have
been adopted by ordinance or re.olut1on. ~e >>lanning
Department will inform the applicant a. to the f... which
are re;u1ra4. All fe.. .ball ba pa14 by check, payable to
the City of Boynton Beach.
IV. CERTIFICATION
(1) (We) understand that this application and all plans and
papers submitted herewith become a part of the permanent
records of the P~anning and zoning Board. (I) (We) hereby
certify that the above atatement. and any 8ta~em.nt. or
Showings 1n any papers or plans .ubmitted herewith are true
to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and belief. This
application will not be accepted unless signed according to
the ins true ns below.
QUANTUM S
H5/"b
Date
or other
v.
~-/b'-' '16
Date
hereby designate the above signed person as (my)
authorized agent with regard to this application.
By:
Si n ure of owner
or Authorized Princi &1 if property
is owned by a corporation or other
business entity.
-'lrf/-;-/f~
Date
** QUANTUM ASSOCIATES, a Florida
general partnership
By QUAUTUH SIMON, INC , an
Indiana corporation, its
::n~
Nelvin Simon
President
"'\
PLANNING DEPARTMENT - APR~L 1991
A: Lanc1Use
4--
~---.-
0-1/16 96
'Zt1 40'" 145 1884
COMMONWEALTH wp
10 23
. .......... .
~~~'*.~,:~.~!~~~K;.. -,~.~,~ ,~..," ;::',::;;:~' ~~;~:-~*f.t~ .!......,;~~~.~
subject to COVGD~nt~, lla!tAtlona
reA tr iet1en' o( rllco'~J .!U'id U:UIJ fot
Quant ye/1.tS
o~sementE lllc,rtgD\lIlS .!lord
~!le yeor 1985 lmd IJUbBe-
And G::lIlntcr does
o lond llnd .. ill dtrtel'\<!
I~O~ pa'80n~ ~hOcBOoYllr
. /<'ct~
hereby !'Jlly VoIlrr&nt tho title to tho Bold
tbe ll~ llga!nst t.he lllwful cUllu o~ !Ill
horounto !let Gr.ll\tO['. hand
wrJ.tten
BOYnt~n '~Q~ C~n.,ce, tr.~
/1. ~lQrl eorporati~n
By ~;fr.Jl----, . -:.
"ii!vAl:d B OeUt5ch, l1'U~~d~nt
(CO~ORA'U'~Mt.) -'
I ~ 300.Dl?
. _ftt'fMH' ,-
STAT,e 01' E'tr.C!l!t~.,. , '.....,.,. .... N.
~... } SSJ ~~..'I""'"
COUNT:( O!'I:~.).b.~. --.....} (1""-''-''-:--
.r\H~;t, ~
Tb~~9~'fIiBb:c.e~~ IIU llCknOde.Clciid &fon.e t.hh F.J~.
day of. '.; ~~;.:.:.:\;.. 19a6:, by ~"'lIrd B De eh ul?usi~on~""ol;
noynton Pll. .k!i,o.t.:..Co..-ercc: IDe I oil floI' a' ." 't. ii:~, bellaH
o! the co,=ntlori~. . ., '~. i;.~;~;-~" "';.'"""'.'",
. . "J 'fr 31-.' ~...,;j:;'" '" ,<',"~'.';"":':~.
,~'. ('ifJ ~"yjI"... \00("",-
No llry,ir.l' U ,.c~~~.", , ~ ~'~., ~
Statl!l'o:t!:t'~tor'.i:~gi;~lU~.l;" :=.
My tO~!.'Bsron4.!fx?il:tt(l:"
~~\;.L~ -
; ."= 'r,o
.~~~~.."'. . , H.' - ",
I'ICary ...... ....... .. ur;...
>>t 0>InInliII,lafI...... .' \1: 1 gag
lIcwIodlM: o.-aI.....~....
~ ~~ .1
~.
III 002/008
--
-....------
~ VV"
O.V16 '96
10 2-l
'0'1 4-""-~ 645 1884
COMMONWEALTH WP
,oJ
--
--------------------
04 16/96
10 25
!t1 4r- 645 1884
cmIMO~-WEALTH WF
~.
r
,-
.--.
i'.foj"'~~r<h~~~!~~~.~~::'''i'"'''!t~~.~.v~:L'~~ -J;'\ ~
"J~~'-:' ...
ttlI1lln'..p....~;
. ..... . _._ -"-""",,,,-,',-cr...;
~_ ~ '-"~"'oo:".....
I' ~~~~~1.~.:-.~~
.,~. '. ~.t..."'" "'''ll!'_~ Ii..:.....'".. ;:'1'l~t.: ft.
ilfJ~.s .
. . fM'.w l~. !R~~ - u tol1b~,e:j,i;; ,
..&ASI"..,uIII!UOI.~ 'lo\II)l-...c:J'~' ,:.~;,
~:,,~1;~L~""~ ' ",.
~oG."'j1JR'liiriiii:nl""~'" SAD .r.. ~ h
M*Mllt!W'Jr. a.uT:MDlCInIt\ftlTIUClQl'..I:'nCH. tf, A DDT.uc::a.'~
M.DtI.~I'IJ:T.~...ft8Q:..'IMl!~,WJDlI 'nCI.!.t~ OI'i.
"'CDlO~~'n<:r*""l"'~~ 1lCCIC'.'nA; .AC&.""~'?
-:or, \ ~~NiM~I&AQI.CDLNrI;t1.0nDo'f.THVQ.'..
1I1Di'A '::-::"'-::.:::<lIltllQlf~,",>>:'.I.lISr.'~~~,~WJH&'OI'J"". ,:
. ....,~~&~~ClNI~ ;"'rc.n-.C,".nt:&'aHT'~'.
,~ UCcr.1ME"I'KlI'mDUIlCJmaoJ_Ayt,PCali:. ;n.n.'~HO,~ ~~.,
.:t~ JIl~~'''. a.U!. .~~nKHc:afwmtA'NAUII101'..:aTllt ",
S . .",,~~,,~'IIl!> _ ;CZHrDUItr;!A',llm.v.:l Cf' "-'lll>', .-
; rttI',lDj'lMr.' fCIICJ.W:at;lI..c.lmlbCl.l~ ~ ,-nil nllf'Cl!l!n"
, ~rA:~D1~~~wmtA'a.~'TO:l1f&otorJ:,'.
:'w ~~QIIli'&:aAzIII(~JJUr.~~i~~'AHCU'(~:"'~ Il:l'\~-
., "MU"MCJDICDI,d'1~,rmu1Q:1'",~~""rJI.A ~:)
,'. 0I'....-.u.l:Z",.J:".~USTI'^'IlBTAMczr~m8;nua.11IUlt::l Wl'H A...
'a~~..~--nn;-It"CZJ~~
:figoJ~'_~',NI'JIlW-I-I!IC1lI: . 'nrr,'I'O "'l'a'flJfi~'
'~~ ..ft~; ~nc'... c;AI ~.IAD;l!!f".,.
}. .....,lIUO ":.'DC.DSliUClOl'iO'ltKiI'lATitlflJlOS lAGOII,. ~
'~~~~HaS,a.x.~~~~OI'.I'ALN KAot
:,'J .~~A.'mf.llMClC "",'I:ml'.1DA raH'I:CH ~-lH
~uc ClI',J!CJPIi 1~'a'InI!~~ar:~f)j D'.: ,,.' W' JAJ1',
:,AI.CM:I:"', ,A.~m"o.la.rzzr,'I'O ~-(21iJVl.m
. SEa'JOIOli~ .~1IlA:lHC\1MZI~ (XltJIr.JI A
DmNCZ:Clf ~;~'ID'-A'~~.~NClA1)I aJQIl.c.... ..,.v
uc cr.IlltClltItOllD,.~JIS'~.MI~~'.AQ'"'' 01' 'ftlZ
lUUC~mo_~KItO&,~',~7mHCZ 1rtJH A
_OI'.~ .t;:D'.,....wt.JT1~'nC.ICIIt.Ttt aJC;Kr (if -.AY
U'C ClI'._IlON),;'.o(hstNlC&~CP.1~1'KJJ 'fHDICI..yrnt A QJIl.Y1I
TO'DtI. a;KT:IIA.~~1.M.iIIIJS ~1w.x'~A ~ ~ fY'
1ll"::IF:~.;.L-m'Nf ~.UHaDJ'a"~l1'I'R1l,DlUICZ 3C>l.;rnt.,. w
:II'~" JlCS1'AM:& Clf.w.. PIZTI\~'PJJJI .,. ~ JIC/" 'nST,
A~O'.~ir!D41'O:NI"CIIItrlCH..~~ klOI'I c:# WAY
u..:& ClI' IlIDItlIt lIlYolIi.bItMa'.-.mt'A~~ Q'.HCll'nt n~. '" "..
u.sr.AZ.CM; l)II!;.3OUnl1lOCMT;~.AYJ~,a+_ .001II:1" A
I:01A1Cf. ell' UUI Ftt:l'I.'DtOIC1~~-"K Q.II.ft.l'D ~ 1%1'1 MA.l'lNC ^
IIlAIlaD gp rtO.M ~Kc!XTU.l.'.NlCU ClI'''''''' U",/tK) ~!\Ie
lDCIJI or aa.tl ~ 'IJEHI:2,Wltlt', A III.AaI'ICI ClI' ,.oIl'Jl( '... i:I' ",.-
EASt," blnAICZ.ClI'~~.J"I!Zt."IO'^:.can'..;,niiQ wrnt A C)IlYl.
1'0 ~ D:Irf ""~A'~'CI'.:'a>>.M'rr.n'.A ~ ,.,..c:u Of'
7"'''''. U"',- NCJ AM I>M; ~ ~'~IJftll.70 " refiT, .~
WIJJI A.u.luNG or.~'~ "";:..'!t.&A51'~A:DUf~ CI' U).117 n:n
TO A ~ at ".' &Mt t>>I&ClI'. nKi, ft.Sf ,1IA1.I',(# 'ntz NO.. ntU>ST
~ CI' :m::rnt,~.~'ItTH:AI~ClP~.QO' f,O' ..-
lAST, ~ ~ JA#LJt<<QlHMIt,WUTilWJP;ao lHIt NOaltllASf
~ cr sv.:JICN, 1Il'.~A PJrAJQ!rit}.2S7LU. niT. TO ^ J'CINf ON
DE ~'I'm~ Cl\.wP3P ~~.cnotIfJ~ wrnt " .vJl,1NG
ClI' -m'" "'.Ir.'.PS!i'A;IlGT~(lf'; ;P&J:T'TO A f"OMt CH
DE.~ ~ClII'..""l".I.JIC'ClI'JI'i.:.'l;0lD'A~ IU IU..ClQItDU) ~
0.1&.'--' r~:~,uIl).OJt.JI:l;")1~'~Uu,~TmHOt yrni ,. C\lIlVl.
1O.UC un ~L1lI(~T.J,JN&:~j,M."~ ~ IInHUl. tuI-nNo;
II; 0tcII:l) ~'QI",lIO'JTH;-"!i~:w.!'I'tSr,'j('MCI'JS OPI.,I.b2 PUT.
.....aJfTML ~'~~:Ir;~r.r~~~!""c;WIG11t or ~1'.1' ,"UT,
nma.xvn1 .....:w.~~A':tl!S1N1C1i.Cf';,.I..u J'Ul'1 ~ YIDl
A.CUl~~.'PtC. JJQff.~~'A1~'Ol\;'JnM FD-T,1l ~
NCU. Cf'_ 4Q" U' -i MID .... Jl1C: '~. Cf',I'tIln rutl
...",~~-"," .~,~~~.., .
1W!lCI WTJM A ~ go JllVritT"io:r~J2O:'"Wur, A MTJlIoICIl M >n.n
.~. ~ 0& l.nI,,'~ ~ P<*I or,. ~
...~
'1~~
Rl;:CORl)tR'"S MEMO; ~'~ 1
Dr Writidt.;,~ or PriD.tiQ, I
"'J'I.~ Ii& thJ.. doolmeIll
."hCD~
'I
,
~
14I 004 1008
.~
04 16 96
10 27
fr1 4~ 645 1884
COM..VO~WEALTH WT
.. _. r~~~~~,~~::,::~~.~
~ . . ;.">t: ,- """~~~#~~~.t,:I;QI:3:.;r,t.<i r-"lr.......~....... .\~...~
~~~~.!~!"~~~: 'rk?C~~:.!~'ia:)~H(1~~~ ,~:;;~#,r~~J'~q(~~~.,~~.~;,~:" ...._
~1lI'.-:...;,....,;,\"..~~.y~1:~"";11. '~~':'"l~!,,~(I'r(,.;ll..{I"'~.:.r,,\lh~" ..... 1'0.... .t.... ..J:...,
\~r:t;.:lll,(-:-'r..'-,'J.:~q~:.~ : :oj ~~-":'''':-j..,~.........;..J~ r ':.~ .J~""} !.:'..~'- ~ , I, ~:-,":f
~"l7\"'~"tI- . .liiI'\lI,tfi ""l.~~ - ........-t ~.' ....,.!w.. ~ 1 ~ ,,&,
. :~~t- ~'"L:.ti-~1I"'''''.'''';~' ~;,.t'..... "I -",'..J',. I ~,.-
J ...... .. .....,... -\) .' \ .I.I~
.-; ~_,;:'I;..._..;. ',lif:.~:.liIIiIa.' ..'.. ~..
~ ~....:...._~ ----:.... - "~,. '"
.~ ~~ ~ ,:""'~r.~~~- - ~"--~frf,'" ~_,r".i':- ~-r-- . -. ,....---~...~.~~.,.
. rl.;y.~~,}\:;-.1I,;""'!1~"'Z::~' . ._'.... r> ~ ".y~.'*:*pdt.1.~~~~';.i.):~W. · r' . i~t
'~'., ' ". J.,' ..".-., I .~;\.;;~~.~ : ..~~ ~.[.tl~,j.&::'. .!.t:~~'1~.~f.~c1"~~:~~:.i ';~J~r~~ .~. .7~
. . .,~.......,-.., or.::....h".~.J.~~~!(lv...~~i;i~ ~.l "
~;i..~~~~~~-:; ~l J.. .'~ ;t.,:,,~
.~. ~'."'';''ww'X''tI. '-..' ~ ';....I~~' .",- .f ~. .~..~
!\. """~i'" . ,.ill)-',~~-:.1'b~'~."..:.. " ,-, ..,.
t. '; , .' ~.I .~. \..' ~ i,"" \ :'},;- r;!
.,. ~~I~\;~ .. . '..~'';'''~~~.}~ .';!~~L~~.,,~ '\~~
..1M. Cfl, . 1 1 .Sl:Cl1ON~1t:l'O'r'NSHI:P.i" ~lfaAACZ'U~~:;p~.
us:rnPJU:H:~;ccunY~n.OiUO. ~.$M).11lAC. r!:~PAAnc~.:3
LUJ.; Df5C1IWIlQ:As'~ ' . . .. .i:~;
, . ...~i~THUSTl,~.OF.,2CT1t,'!~~":i..~''':~~2 .
~....,,,~ ~u..sTHTHtHCZ1YITH,^,U1JUNG~0l"!PJTH.~.].l';C(1Il.."!..
'. ,:-~. . ~um~a";:2cnoN~,17:A~DlSTI'IfCI. or.';UII""~:PUT~
.~:; TOY._:I'HEl<<%r..~^"KARJNGtQf.J SOU1liiW$U'."''n$TI A__~~~'
'\'::,;, - MT . 4O:co' r,to.'itH!U~OIHfimZ2CINNIH .UJD:PaNTfAL!O}ll,;.-:
r'-:~:; ~. ClHt~~ItXiHTjOP.'"^Ylll..Jfom'Of=!tJoc;z:R.o.a.n~''''''''''' .,.,
.. ~ ASl r~~~i~ 1\~,,..7toPi.1HZiPU!.Jr:.JlIC:oRn5 or,,,~. ":
~. ." P.~l~axMYiI .~Cti.9fIHrR!P.:~.ClP'iJOUnf'CO-' - ~.. --
'.!rocr.laiilA!aG~nnU ~tuCK~~I~;IAJD. um.~7.~ ~11
~LYlNC[~~!ZStioP1~IARA.1.1..mTO,nm' IAJTilJNl!;~ ~C11ON ,'. .
'~17~,^,'i.Orsr~CIf)II~nmTOMrPOlNTjlTHI!HCI':JOt1JlI. ..~, )t~\ 1'-.' ~~
~ftST:fAlbST~~~101J'Ertil~~nr U!!,)';J:r.; Y!Sr;,. A"'.~' ~i:
'if DtSTANCE{ D:.".:PnTil.nmafSOUlH~~{OJ'J.~fnsr;^~OOTANCJl. OF *
.~.11~I~c:M^lPCINTi"ON1'rJi!.(N9RmtRJGm' OFJiy},y"uetQll'..N..Y.:'J',' :~
~ ^~ASilt.f~JH~~)I~'.PAG!:Huq AND o.JU.. ."'ft, ".
P^ .. 1~:gglHO!_~OP"'A1.N'",,^CH..(;tUfry '-~.
~ I\!~QflNOll..m.a.rlJ"~~j.nslt AJ..('.lHG T11e ~l1i
l.lN'e{oe:.Jli.... 22Nli^VENtiP.,'f^~DJSTANarOP' ,1tJ1..u 1M TO ^ POINT.
~". ~iCUl'a!~.l1lmiW!.'11lHAViNG-;^il.AD!U5. i5r "71.c2. I'!I.!l. ^
~ANQZ~~l~~)r,WANDfAWARC'lmGTtH)If Jt).]l fUT TO
A:;POlNJ"Jli,~.1/iTH:4\1!UJUNG~Ofl':.NORnt rr,02' ....EAsT, A D1.$TANCZ
~Jl~1.711FEETj'~~NOilmr~1.)1''- U. r...asr. A DjSf.AHCl Of' '".70 ,~U
TOI^~pOJN1.\~ HORTrr;l~ '2' ~ Un, ^ ornAHC! Of' '7)",21 ft.!T
1ol0Rl!: OR.;USS"~TO mE POINt or ~
~J,
;
.~
':.
~
.....
,
,.
~.
.\'fi:
... ~}I.'
Jf
.:2i:
~.
..~
'"~ '
:"?t:"
~ . TI ~" ~,;."'"...~::,~0~'~- .
~7~.,:J'-",'..'~.- -:"~'~
'~. 0' _~ ~~, -, ~ .' .\,"
)~:::\~.~~'r;'-'::..': ..>~ .:)r
~
I4I 005 008
...-.... ..~
04/16/96
t!1 4
10 28
645 1884
1lJ006/008
-- -
04 16,96
10 29
U1 ~
64:: 1884
COMMONWEALTH Wl
III OOi 1008
-
-4.---.:
~-
):
~
~
./
--
- -..~~ - ......--
04 16 96
10 30
"6"1 "
645 1884
COItBIONWEALTH WI
III 008 008
~~~~ -
.... J ..".-~,..' .....tt\
~,
.,"
'~"._..-....- ...".,--
.~
\1\
~~ .....ro.......~~ "......"....,
--..-::.:;.
li
. ~~~ ~
.n Ji~..
~! "iI
~~~ ~;.
~!i Jit
;!: "\!
-. ~.~
I! i~~
i;l ;~
p ~t
cl .....
~i II
.;; ii ~ ~., tJ~ ;U~~~ni!! \.iiil im~ I IIi I~i i; !l\!j ! ! t1'
s' ... ~~. . l'Jlla .e I ,:t I' iiln J I. I;, -I .. ~f-
is )~. h.. i.'. fl!l,!, ~~:d Ihl! i ;~~ 1'1 i ,~! .
at \'i..~'" ill:l1li.1 Q 'j:" tllll lli',1 I \
_; I lEI f '1_1 ~, I: I Ii
~ ~~ il - ~ i{'i~ h:' a ,JIll i '!!:'I I \
_ .,J.I .' '=hl" .I .,- "I! .1 ,". i..
" I\~ ~ ~ . . Ii. I :...~ 111~n I a II I
.. ; I. ;. r' 'l~ I,ll ~;, iiil~ t I;! 'I ~ I ~
~ -l l~i : j' I ,:\.;11 0.:11 p!,In ! 'Ki .I. t ! ~
~IQ _ ;;1'3 _~ 11 I!: It ft ; - -
~ ~ 1i~ "'. ' ,- !~Ii. . .~.~~! ~i ~. I"~' '. ~ I ".' .
~~ 1~ ~~. t~,:. ~'::dJ11:!I\'~ll~.r.i~~tl ~~~J~\t11,~dtj;J1~~~t~''''l~:;r-r{~~~~~ti1~~;~~
~,,,,"~",.:- '" /....'~..'!.l...;.."'.l._' ..i,)~..jll..~:r~.ll(.'~ "0" . ~...~ ,'.
o ~. :,..tJ; 'i . I'" I ,,~'. ,.~.' . .~'~.
, ~J -. 1;i . ~ ;.' ,-
l. lii!l'l
..".."!
,
-
\~;~.
f{" . '
'.. .;,__s-
-,,'r': ~
Ir-
t
Ui il~l; ,U\~ ~
\ \~i ii\~\ 1r'~~ i
a .~\ ~~l~\ ad'l
~I' ,:!! Ii-,a:
, ",1 ,. ".1 J
it. r. ~,l Ililt
In ~!hl ,I~i.
i · ':1' ;- J
j!\ d: 'i II!,-
ei ll". il~ i
; ,! r. c,,\li
ii~ &~In ~~.,i
i\~ ~~~I' hid
~ I :1;1"'; !H-
it;; --' ,I-
. ..,?i i. -II!
I', , l.se
,I ,.~I
~i :i!'~
;' ;:"~F
~
1
i
i
;
\~
! 'lft'illUl I -:,
! I C "i~ ~ 01
· j/iR11i' It '
i . .ilt ,,,II I
i !h~!~ !l I. !
~ 'iUj. II P.
a lii&I~.'1
j ~ii';;.;l
i n~ I
~ eel r
i C...I'~
, I ili JIt
, li\ Ii
Ii ".
~ ~ h .'il
'f ;l,ds.,
; l!~\ih:i
'- i =",llliiui
. s', ..,
i\ I u~t i -: \
~ : II i 2;
Ii il!Ci " .
I! 1''''1 .!
. ;111,11 t I
~~l ill;l J"
Ii ,- J'I "
- -I -
, "I.::
. -I. ft-
~ c !81 ;
- ; ~I . i
~'li',"
i .-
, let :;1_ iiJal1
, .~. ~I~i .ii ~
~', ~n I)~h sdil
h III ,a., IVi!i
I 41' I!~
:1\.1 t:: ua I-.;!
J~.... ~ '.11
, iU.t \11.'
I,) 'i (. ,. r
: . .s~, ,
I :',.'t.~ ~'.i-
~ail~.
~
Je
Ff
rr
~.#..
L
,....r:.~
,-
..
'":' ~'
~~:~~~..~~
I!Y:'~'~'" ~'
6~.,~-;~; -
~i!'i .i.. i~
...
:" d'~
...f i~.~
, ''i
~ '
. -or.;;. ,."
;,0",. .....;;.~ l.:;;.....).~
~ - ,.. ,;-.'.~".
..
~~ ~ ~ ,~!~'i!I",!~ai';'~I'~> ,
ill' ! ~-c,;!,. c.
i 11'01'" ;\I'~I'lG~;"i~~!;~~111 '
i i.;: .>, .jl ~l:ltR!iiii ji.!ill.' ,
_ -...,;8- '1Ift,,~..v4 -I --~
I 1~'i~31~ ,~ ai-:~':,~i li!".l;i
e ;~'i.l; . i,;~I~.lliliti~i;'= I~
"" 41" ,. ..._ ..... ..., R. j..
: ;":Ii!" iti?lhi ,:.t'II,:li~ I
I ~!~ .i~' -;&:~ i-I~.I.C-;I-Ili
_ ~__~'o_ .~, ~ II_I,,--;!:;'i!} -
.. . ,,_ .. ,I> I." -I:, _. ,,-,-.' gS I
I :! ,;i! i~!:I!.~~:.I.ili; :.;:~
I :- ~~Io.: .i.o- _i.i6i!-.~:'1'6EI
, il .;=! i.l"\,,,-iiii~o.:ll=':i'c-~1
'll 'I ".. I .V..~ "I". .1 "
: 'r c' .... ... ;'~-.-.. .. !Il....~i..1.
~ '; i~ .it;~~:I:~~i'~';':la';1
., II -I" .~F-_ I~I." - ,
~4 ...~ ~~~~-~ IftJ':! ~ ..,
:: ! 1= jlll! \. i :"ldf, I~
.; 0.: ~: .1,!.:a'I~\'="i.io.:;SJ;
;= I $: , =~- 10.:': ~::~.!!l:..i:
_ to o;,!~l ~;' !:;iil' lftl!
o ,__;o..a ~--~7 171 a ~-
i ~ ,. i"'ic'~l~':iO ;~i~ ~ ,
J ~ i! a~i,;;~!l;~,l~'l!~;l~-::
i :.i' ~~zli".~ttSJ~I~:i. ~:
, ;:i ~i~:=i:~~_~~J;.I~=~~'i
, ps.l18 II -: ,-
~ Clal- \;; ~
. I~J.~il'
19J'-~I' , ' "
J, - ~ -
.:rill! 1 ! ~
hl~.~1 I:
i ~- ~.. t
~;!i -8
\ji~'la _
~! ~ii: i! !
. ,. 1.- ..
"I~ "s
1= i.
I!'# I.
I: ~ ~ ~
, :~i ;11
..r:~
;iit~:-
"\i~:'i
~ J.
I.. ;
"i~~
n~\l~
iUi~!
.ii!'~~
~'! nIt H \
tt.~ Jl;i!;;-
,= I ;~Itl .
H : SIah n .
" . Ua:' I' -
! 1 ~t{ll
- I i';l~J !
, -li!~
~ I. n
z .~Ia,t
F --';"Ii
...1.1;
:=: 'UJi
I I..~
i . lie
;; i'li"
F "il!~
! iho'
, 5i;~i
T ili~i
I.. .
. ~u"
&!,
. &
1
~':~"ti ~
-------.-
..~-,....".:~
.. ~
. -,I,'!;-L
~C::"-~~".~.'
"~'
~..
, . -
.- ;,'!."
(I)
~
-t
<5
z
-0
r-
~
c.."O
c>
Zr-cn
l'1~..
__CD-t 0
U)I"lO ...
eIl>~ -.
ell n Z
::Z:(I)1
nX-< '.-
g=oz:O
i ~ -II> (i) no.
l\);< (11 _ ·
(II (II (I) Z C
::z:-t 0 ·
1"l!4 c:
I"1I"l -t
Cil %
" 0"
(II'"
::z:." ~
1"1r- )>
1"10 Z
-t::a G)
z- ",
.0
_ > -II>
. (.II
n
rr1
Z
.-.t '.
tTt'-.
:0
", .;..~ 'i
)>
en
-t
~7.~...,,~:.
....-=.~ ..~.
------.
I; ;Illil~
~ 5:1"'
'" ~nt
- ;2"'..
Ii
.~
,.15.
~E
...
",6
0'"
..:
"",
~~
_C
0'"
..z
.....
on
I
I
-j
I
r Ll"l ~'I
m~~~~~
-:r~m
-'J ~, n
.L....
~.
-~:
"
.
!it
..
~
n
~
~
hrW'~H:~~
, -I1,jg.;..~...
C') ,:=~ y-
i'T1 0 \ I :~VI N
AI'~" i )ig ~~
~~! Jp"'o
: 01 i~....J
! i I "q'\
I I ~
; =1: n
I Hili 1:
1 · I~
;..
~
c;:)
\n
~!
.
i
,
::
.,
J
,
~
i
~
'OIIC'" IlIOM _lOG( .... to 'lAtA"",
~ :: c~:~--.:.:.. ~~ '""
IIUOI..",.ONI "-v Me It.." OrAft. 10," '-
he ''" 0"" 01 "h. .t" lOr It. To..
,..,..y ..,....., 0" Ie 1M. IIICO'1O IClOll
IIn. ..... I.". .....114_' ........ '....,_
..,. ...... ~'fI" Of ftC u-.'-.c.
'.. ., tII, ..... .,.. ....,
-----------*'----:---
C'TtOIl 17-. ) '00' N
________-.i.-_~__..L__
/
=:1 fV..~~:c~I.lr Of rU."IM. .Q.
".11.'. U"..1. ,.'::" ::~ol tAU",-".
w 00--)1' O' ..
[
;;; ~~
\.~I....i_A~~Tutvi PAF.\ 4T
Pl.AT W6 PEl.
~. E;.v.... ~
c.:
BC.
.t\lT !
t.::-:"
II00.)I,t .
UII'
J 1!
-=#-~
tli
:u I
o
tIl i , ,..,
H
- '.
.w
.,,17
..
~
2
.~
"..
.~
~
.
....
.. .
..l:
.....
"I
'"
VI
..
-:
~r; ;::..
:-- -;
r;
CXl "
! N 0
"
I ...... if' ~
. ~~
J ~ .. g) I"l
I "0 ~
t .. "2{"8: ..
:: .~~ J !:a 0
.. 6
: IE- !:!:::: ..
I- "'.
i
- "
~
..
.
..
.
..
.
z
.
..
~
~
.' I
f:~i-
nt'
~!~i
I~lj~
I.' i-
HaL!
.- .
;ii- J
Hd :
:.~~fE
:!i"ri
~ - - ,ol
Eli~:'
_I -i
h. ;
1 i I
en
",
n
~
o
z
."
r-
)>
....
c..-o
~~ -
", !II: .'"
_ tIl -l
u> fTI 0
~~~!:(
:]:Z_
enZ
n:I:Ci)
0-
C"'tl
-Z
Z-4
r\)-<
(/I en (f)
:]: -4 0
fTI l> C
fTI -4 -l
ul fTI :I:
0"
(/I""
ffi .." ~
mr Z
-40Ci)
z~ ,."
00
N,!>~
OJ
o
"
Z
~-l
01 ::z: :tJ
I"T1n
~.
o
.
~
o
"TI
(")
rrt
Z
-;
rrt
::0
,."
l>
(f)
-l
:.
:s:-~~ ""
, ~~~ ~
~~~. .5:
"'1--- I!ii
=.iH
S'i'EE
. ~~
tiii~ ..~~
..... ~ 11& r . i.
I ~-. III
I=i: . J- ~'
~ . 1 II ~~
ii~=E .u ~ I J I I '. 0
,"!Ii n~ ; ,II. ~ :1
~Irt H jn ~ ~r- 2 ~
-I
~. -I ~~ r I I
i; , r I . J
.
~! ,. i! I
.
...
~
..J
/-
.
Quantum Park
Analysis of High
Ridge Road and
Gateway
Boulevard
Prepared for
SImon PropertIes
IndIanapolIs, IN
4) Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 1996
........-; _ r1I Kimley-Horn
1II.......i_~ and Associates, Inc.
Engineering, Planning, and Environmental Consultants
TABLE OF CONTENTS
r~
INTRODUCTION
ANALYSIS
2
Background Traffic Forecast
Project Traffic Volumes
2
3
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
7
CONCLUSIONS
9
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 - 2013 PM Peak Turning Movement Volumes
2
Table 2 - PM Peak Hour Trip Generation
4
LIST OF FIGURES
Figures 1 - Gateway Boulevard and Park Ridge Boulevard Turning Movement
~u~ 6
.
Quantum Park
Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
INTRODUCTION
This study responds to Section 5 of the revised 1994 Quantum Park DRI Development Order by
providing an analysis of the access to that part of the project served by Park Ridge Boulevard A
previous approval for a new high school site requires all other project development, which is
served by High Ridge Road, to access Gateway Boulevard at the High Ridge Road intersection
The high school will have access to Gateway Boulevard at two locations consistent with the
original access plan As a part of the study, three small parcels, which were not included In the
original ADA, have been added These parcels total approximately 14 acres and are located
between Park Ridge Boulevard and 1-95, south of Gateway Boulevard ~!~hough land is bein~
added, no additional traffic demands will be created since previously approved development
~..---
entitlements will be shifted to these sites from other portions of the development. The present
- -----
study includes an evaluation of the effects of these changes.
As a part of the access evaluation, a proposed CarMax site is inc~~.?:d in this stud~_ The CarMax
site will include 13 7 acres including 4 acres of the 14 acres which are being added to Quantum
Park.
H;\wp\Quantum.Rpt
April 9, 1996
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Quantum Park
Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard
ANALYSIS
BACKGROUND TRAFFIC FORECAST
Turning-movement counts were performed at the intersection of High Ridge Road and Gateway
Boulevard to develop a baseline for background traffic. Consistent with the methodology in the
original ADA, the PM peak hour is used for evaluation The counts were made on March 21, 1996
from 4'00 to 6 00 PM are attached From these counts PM peak hour turning-movements were
developed and grown to the year 2013 The study year is consistent with the original ADA. A
review of traffic growth trends since the opening of the 1-95 interchange, shows a significant initial
growth in response to the opening and a growth of 4 percent during the last two years. The
database is not adequate to actually establish a growth trend Discussions with the MPO staff
revealed that a very small growth is projected by the 2015 model after consideration of Quantum
Park project traffic growth Therefore, a compound growth rate of 2 percent per year was selected
to represent a conservative background traffic growth The total growth of 40 percent was added to
existing turning movements to reflect the 2013 background traffic. Table 1 summarizes the
projected volumes at the intersection in the year 2013
TABLE 1
2013 PM PEAK TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES (Background Traffic)
Movement PM Peak Hour (1996) PM Peak Hour (2013)
Eastbound Through 944 1322
Eastbound Right* 2 2
Eastbound Left 86 120
Westbound Through 1122 1571
Westbound Right 178 249
Westbound Left* 30 30
Northbound Through* 6 6
Northbound Right* 82 82
Northbound Left* 4 4
Southbound Through* 6 6
Southbound Right 115 161
Southbound Left 146 204
*These turns include only project trips and, therefore, no background traffic adjustment is applicable.
-2
H;\wp\Quantum.Rpt
April 9 1996
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Quantum Park
Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard
PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
An trip generation analysis of the potential trips generated by the properties located to the south of
the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road was then performed This analysis
was performed generally using the 5th Edition ITE Trip Generation Manual The analysis updates
the 1984 ADA, to include the proposed CarMax Site.,.. the high school and the inclusion 0(lgts80.L
81, an~~.L Table 2 demonstrates the probable trip generation and directional distribution for the
proposed land uses for the PM peak hour The trip generation for the CarMax site was based upon
trip generation research for a CarMax site in Orlando, conducted by Kimley-Horn and Associates,
Inc. and approved by the City of Orlando Presently, the ITE Trip Generation Manual 5th Edition
recommends a daily trip generation rate for new car sales of 4791 trips per 1000 square feet of
gross floor area. Due to the small sample size (3 sites) ITE recommends using this number with
caution, as the three sites provided a range of 15 64 to 79 96 trips/1 00 SF GFA. For the proposed
CarMax location in Orlando, Kimley-Horn used a rate of 23 0 trips/lOOO SF GFA. This trip
generation rate was developed based upon observations of the trip generation characteristics of a
similar facility Several days of counts at this location demonstrated that approximately 12 percent
of the dally trips occur during the PM peak. From this a trip generation rate of 2 75 trips/1 000 SF
GFA during the PM peak was used for analysis. This is consistent with a previous study of 15 new
car dealerships which returned an average of 240/1000 SF GFA in the PM peak. This number is
more conservative for the CarMax site as the dealership only sells used cars and does not provide
maintenance service to the general public, only to its customers. Thus, CarMax is likely to generate
at a rate below those of new car dealerships. It is further noted that in comparison to the
previously proposed land uses where the CarMax site will be located, the CarMax has a favorable
trip generation rate.
The balance of the undeveloped sites were generated very conservatively on an individual basis. It
is likely, that as development occurs, sites will be aggregated such that the actual trip generation
will be lower By using the conservative rates, however, maximum assurance is provided relative
to the adequacy of access while providing flexibility in the future development plan In essence,
any development program which generated no more than 1935 PM peak hour tnps can have
adequate access via the High Ridge Road intersection
Trip Assignment
The traffic assignment pattern was based upon the ADA with consideration of trends since the ADA
was prepared The ADA showed a traffic assignment of travel to and from Park Ridge Boulevard as
being 31 percent to and from the west, 22 percent to and from the north, and 47 percent to and
from the east. To be conservative, the distribution to and from the east was increased to 60 percent
3-
H;\wp\Quantum.Rpt
April 9, 1996
TABLE 2
PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION
I LOT # I LAND USE I ACRES ! Floor Area! Trips ! In ! Out I
46A Industrial 2.05 35719 15 2 13
47A Industrial 1 39 24219 10 1 9
47B Industrial 086 14985 6 1 5
48A Industrial 148 25788 11 1 9
48B Industrial 148 25788 11 1 9
48C&D Industrial 352 61332 26 3 22
50B&C Industrial 541 94264 39 5 35
50A Industrial 1 41 24568 10 1 9
510 Industrial 1.21 21083 9 1 8
56 Industrial 302 52620 22 3 19
57 Industrial 58 101059 42 5 37
72 Industrial 546 95135 40 5 35
70 Industrial 36 62726 26 3 23
69 Industrial 36 62726 26 3 23
73B Industrial 1 34 23348 10 1 , 9
73A Industrial 3.24 56454 24 3 21
74 Industrial 2.71 47219 20 I 2 17
75 Industrial 302 52620 22 3 19
76 Industrial 343 59764 25 3 22
68A Industrial 2.06 35893 15 2 13
68B Industrial 1 54 26833 11 1 10
TOTALS INDUSTRIAL 5763 1004145 418 50 368
77,78,79,80 CarMax 13787 42580 117 59 I 59
81 Commercial 416 45302
82 Commercial 586 63815
TOTALS COMMERCIAL 1002 109118 694 347 347
66 Office 355 61855 130 22 108
67A Office 2.45 42689 99 17 82
67C Office 2.01 35022 86 15 71
67B Office 188 32757 82 14 68
65B Office 2.41 41992 98 17 81
TOTALS OFFICE 12 214315 495 84 ; 411
N/A High School* N/A 80 23 57
Subtotal of Future Project Trips 1805 563 I 1242
46B,46C,4 7C,4 70,49 ,49A,55 Exist. Ovlpd Parcels 66.29 N/A 130 38 92
\
TOTAL OF ALL PROJECT TRIPS 1935 /601 1334
*Represents portion of traffic accessing school site from Park Ridge Boulevard
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Quantum Park
Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard
with appropriate adjustments to the other directions. The project traffic was assigned to the
mtersectlon, based on these percentages, and added to eXisting project tnps.
Project trips for turnmg movements not related to Park Ridge Boulevard were adjusted as follows so
that the total project travel remains consistent with the original ADA (i e , no increase in project
trips) Directional project link volumes, north and east of the Park Ridge Boulevard intersection,
,,~
were held constant. That is to say, that the eastbound through project trips were reduced by the
increase in the northbound right-turning project traffic volume. The eastbound left-turn project trips
were reduced by the increase in the northbound through volume. The westbound project through
trips were reduced by the increase in the westbound left-turning project trips, and the southbound
right-turn volume was reduced by the increase in the southbound through volume. Project trips
were then added to background traffic to establish total forecast volumes.
From this analysis turning movements for the total traffic occurring dunng the PM peak at the
intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road were determined for the full build out
year (2013) These turning movements are recorded in Figure 1
5-
H;\wp\Quantum.Rpt
April 9,1996
GATEWAY BLVD of PARK RIDGE BLVD
PM PEAK TURNING MOVEMENTS
(2e>13)
NOT TO SCALE
GATEWAY BLVD
o-~
(1)(O~
==~-
(1)(O!:2
N(1)N
J l ~
~
w
\'J
Q
OC
I
\'J
I
-t.-150 (399)
'-409 (1980)
.--368 (368)
(220) 100 ~
122761 954 -+-
{I371 137 -..
~
~
({l
w
\'J
Q
OC
~
<:t:
0...
~ t t
NIOl'-
OON
r<1NCO
NIOt:"
OON
r<1NCO
---
......,_.. Kimley-Hom
~_L.J and Associates, Inc.
F'M PEAK HOUR l'RAI"T=lC YOLlNE6: FIGURE I
--+ DIrection GATEWAY BLVD AND PARK RIDGE BLVD
100 ProJect.
(220) ProJect., EXI6Ung lInd Other Growth TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
QUANTUM PARK
4/9/98
04l1O:zgoo\ tmc.dwa
O4lI029.oo
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Ine.
Quanturn Park
Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard
I NTERSECTION ANALYSIS
The intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road was analyzed for the build out year
2013, for the PM peak total traffic volumes shown in Figure 1 This analysis included the
Investigation of any timing, phasing or geometric improvements that may be required In the future
for the signal to operate at an acceptable level-of-serVice.
A highway capacity analysis was undertaken and it was determined that if full trip generation
potential occurs, improvements to the intersections geometries would be required to provide an
adequate level of service. The existing geometry of the intersection is as follows.
Northbound three lanes, single left, through, and a shared through/right.
Southbound three lanes, single left, through, and a shared through/right.
East and Westbound - six lanes: dual lefts, three through lanes, and a right turn only lane
It was determined that to provide adequate capacity at full buildout (2013) dual lefts would be
required in the southbound direction and dual rights would be needed northbound This could be
accomplished by restriping the southbound lanes to dual lefts and a single through/right, and by
constructing an additional right-turn lane on the northbound approach This configuration will
provide adequate capacity, Level-of-Service "D", for the full buildout of the development, including
the 1935 PM peak trips generated by the portion of the project served by Park Ridge Boulevard
These intersection improvements will not be needed, however, until justified by the growth in
project trips. The existing intersection geometry will support 1200 project trips served by Park
Ridge Boulevard An analysis was performed to determine the PM peak hour thresholds to stage
the improvements to the existing intersection Stage 1 - Existing Condition - without lane additions
to the existing intersection, but restriping the southbound approach for dual lefts and a
through/right, the south portion of the development can generate up to 1300 PM peak hour trips
and still operate at an acceptable Level-of-Service "D" Stage 2 - Full Buildout - with the
modifications discussed in the above paragraph (restriping for dual lefts southbound and adding a
lane for dual right-turn lanes northbound), the intersection can operate at an acceptable Level-of-
Service "D" under full buildout condition (1935 PM peak hour trips from the southern section of
the development) Stage 3 - Increased Capacity - additional capacity beyond what is needed at full
buildout can be provided by, in addition to the improvements in Stage 2, adding a lane southbound
and separating out the through/right into a through and a right-turn-only lane. This configuration
will provide adequate capacity at Level-of-Service "D" up to 2300 PM peak hour trips from the
portion of the project served by Park Ridge Boulevard
7
H;\wp\Quantum.Rpt
April 9 1996
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Ine.
Quantum Park
Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard
The analyses for all the stages is attached It should be noted that these numbers are very
conservative, as for each stage the background traffic and traffic generated by other portions of the
project were held at the full buildout year levels.
An additional analysis was performed to determine the impact of trip intensity shiftrng from the
south to north of the intersection It was determined.j:hat if a portion of the trip generation intensity
were to occur to the north of the intersection, that was originally project to occur south of the
intersection, the level-of-service for the intersection would actually increase as fewer trips would go
through the rntersectlon An example analysis of this, where 25 percent of the trip generation of the
south was moved north of the intersection is attached This analysis resulted in a lower total
intersection delay than if the trips were to have occurred in the south Such a result is expected
since the north/south traffic through the intersection is reduced
-8-
H;\wp\Quantum.Rpt
April 9, 1996
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Ine.
Quantum Park
Analysis of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard
CONCLUSIONS
Based upon the analysis provided in this study, it can be concluded that:
o Adequate access can be provided for the site by one intersection
'-
o Adequate capacity is provided for the additional parcels.
o CarMax is a favorable land use from a trip generation stand point.
o No improvements are needed until the Park Ridge Boulevard trips exceed 1200 per hour
o Restriping on the north approach to provide dual lefts will serve 1300 peak hour trips.
o A northbound right-turn lane addition to provide dual nghts will serve 1900 trips.
o A southbound right-turn lane addition will serve 2300 trips.
o Land use changes from office to commercial north of Gateway Boulevard (parcels 83, 84,
85 and 91) can be made without changing the conclusions of this study if the "increase in
trips" is deducted from the preceding thresholds.
o Moving trip generation from south of Gateway Boulevard to north of Gateway Boulevard on
High Ridge Road improves intersection operation
o The intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road will operate at full buddout at
a satisfactory Level-of-Service "D"
-9-
H;\wp\Quantum.Rpt
April 9 1996
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4a 04-09-1996
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
==~====================================================================
Streets (E-W) Gateway
Analyst KLF
Area Type Other
Comment Max voluume with no
(N-S) High
File Name
3-26-96 PM
improvements
Ridge
EXISTING HC9
Peak
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- - -- - - --
No Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 <
Volumes 220 2276 86 232 1980 3.sl9 190 129 521 417 60 198
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 16 40 40 22
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left * *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right *
SB Right WE Right *
Green 10 OA 47 OA Green 15 OA 17 OA
Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0
Cycle Length 105 secs phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 371 3539 0 645 0 105 31 8 D 38 6 D
T 2555 5588 1 032 0 457 40 2 E
R 1010 1583 0 073 0 638 4 7 A
WB L 371 3539 0 677 0 105 32 6 D 19 5 C
T 2555 5588 0 897 0 457 20 3 C
R 1010 1583 0 374 0 638 5 9 B
NB L 402 1770 0 498 0 333 17 0 C 50 0 E
T 319 1863 0 426 0 171 25 7 D
R 482 1583 1 049 0 305 69 6 F
SB L 428 1770 1 026 0 333 61 1 F 47 9 E
TR 567 3306 0 459 0 171 25 7 D
Intersection Delay = 33 3 sec/veh Intersection LOS D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 1 032
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4a 04-09-1996
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
=======================================================================
Streets (E-W) Gateway
Analyst KLF
Area Type Other
Comment IMPROVEMENTS STAGE 1
(N-S) High Ridge
File Name STAGE1 HC9
3-26-96 PM Peak
===========~===========================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- - -- - - --
No Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 <
Volumes 220 2276 93 250 1980 3Q9 205 139 562 417 65 190
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 16 40 40 22
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left * *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right *
SB Right WB Right *
Green 8 OA 47 OA Green 12 OA 22 OA
Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0
Cycle Length 105 secs phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 303 3539 0 788 0 086 39 2 D 39 2 D
T 2555 5588 1 032 0 457 40 2 E
R 965 1583 0 084 0 610 5 5 B
WB L 303 3539 0 893 0 086 49 4 E 21 3 C
T 2555 5588 0 897 0 457 20 3 C
R 965 1583 0 392 0 610 6 9 B
NB L 328 1770 0 659 0 276 19 3 C 47 3 E
T 408 1863 0 358 0 219 22 7 C
R 528 1583 1 042 0 333 64 9 F
SB L 438 3539 1 032 0 124 71 7 F 56 2 E
TR 364 1662 0 673 0 219 27 6 D
Intersection Delay = 34 7 sec/veh Intersection LOS D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9 0 sec Critical v / c (x) = 1 036
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4a 04-09-1996
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
=======================================================================
Streets (E-W) Gateway
Analyst KLF
Area Type Other
Comment IMPROVEMENTS STAGE 2
(N-S) High Ridge
File Name STAGE2 HC9
3-26-96 PM Peak
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- - -- - - --
No Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 <
Volumes 220 2276 137 368 1980 399 302 205 827 417 96 190
,-
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 16 40 40 22
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left * *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right *
SB Right WB Right *
Green 14 OA 54 OA Green 16 OA 20 OA
Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0
Cycle Length 120 secs Phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 442 3539 0 540 0 125 32 9 D 39 7 D
T 2561 5588 1 029 0 458 42 0 E
R 989 1583 0 128 0 625 5 9 B
WB L 442 3539 0 902 0 125 48 6 E 24 1 C
T 2561 5588 0 895 0 458 22 6 C
R 989 1583 0 382 0 625 7 3 B
NB L 313 1770 1 016 0 308 65 3 F 40 4 E
T 326 1863 0 663 0 175 33 3 D
R 1029 3167 0 910 0 325 33 6 D
SB L 501 3539 0 902 0 142 46 5 E 51 2 E
TR 295 1684 0 943 0 175 58 8 E
Intersection Delay = 35 1 sec/veh Intersection LOS D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 1 019
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2 4a 04-09-1996
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
=========~=============================================================
Streets (E-W) Gateway
Analyst KLF
Area Type Other
Comment IMPROVEMENTS STAGE 3
(N-S) High Ridge
File Name STAGE3 HC9
3-26-96 PM Peak
=======================================================================
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 1
Volumes 220 2276 164 442 1980 399 362 246 992 417 115 190
,~
Lane Width 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 16 40 40 22
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left * *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right *
SB Right * WB Right *
Green 17 SA 48 SA Green 13 OA 15 OA
Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0
Cycle Length 110 secs Phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 595 3539 0 402 0 168 26 6 D 43 1 E
T 2515 5588 1 048 0 450 46 8 E
R 957 1583 0 163 0 605 6 2 B
WB L 595 3539 0 805 0 168 33 9 D 22 3 C
T 2515 5588 0 911 0 450 22 3 C
R 957 1583 0 395 0 605 7 4 B
NB L 363 1770 1 050 0 282 75 1 F 62 2 F
T 271 1863 0 956 0 145 61 3 F
R 1080 3167 1 048 0 341 58 1 E
SB L 450 3539 1 004 0 127 64 5 F 47 6 E
T 271 1863 0 447 0 145 28 6 D
R 540 1583 0 328 0 341 17 5 C
Intersection Delay = 39 8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 1 042
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSEC1ION SUMMARY Version 2 4a 04-09-1996
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
=======================================================================
Streets (E-W) Gateway
Analyst KLF
Area Type Other
Comment 25% Growth North of
(N-S) High Ridge
File Name 25PERCEN HC9
3-26-96 PM Peak
Intersection (STAGE 2)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- - -- - - --
No Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 <
Volumes 254 2276 103 276 1980 491 226 153 620 624 72 266
Width ,~
Lane 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0 12 0
RTOR Vols 16 40 40 22
Lost Time 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00 3 00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
EB Left * NB Left * *
Thru * Thru *
Right * Right *
Peds Peds
WB Left * SB Left * *
Thru * Thru * *
Right * Right * *
Peds Peds
NB Right * EB Right *
SB Right WB Right * *
Green 8 OA 45 OA Green 12 OA 9 OA 10 OP
Yellow/AR 4 0 4 0 Yellow/AR 4 0 0 0 4 0
Cycle Length 100 secs Phase combination order #1 #2 #5 #6 #7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance Summary
Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach
Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS
----- ------- ----- ----- ----- -----
EB L 319 3539 0 863 0 090 43 5 E 36 9 D
T 2570 5588 1 025 0 460 37 3 D
R 981 1583 0 093 0 620 4 9 A
WB L 319 3539 0 942 0 090 54 9 E 20 3 C
T 2570 5588 0 892 0 460 19 2 C
R 1124 1583 0 423 0 710 4 0 A
NB L 325 1770 0 732 0 260 27 3 D 37 3 D
T 205 1863 0 786 0 110 40 1 E
R 728 3167 0 947 0 230 40 1 E
SB L 779 3539 0 870 0 220 31 7 D 43 3 E
TR 330 1648 1 010 0 200 66 8 F
Intersection Delay = 31 5 sec/veh Intersection LOS D
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 15 0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 1 045
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
~ CAR DULERSHlP TRIP GK:URATIOl( DATA
JAasGmLLr A.RKA
------------- PH PEAK HOUR -----------------
llUKBER OF VEll I CLl TR I P
--VEHICLE TRIPS--- ---GEXERATIOX RATE---
'-
BOILDIP:G (per 1000 g:sf)
DEALERSH I P LOCATIOK ARn ITTER EXIT iOtAL EJ(m tIIT TOTAL
Pontiac (Kelly) Blanding Blvd 62,000 g:st 53 78 131 o 855 1 258 113
Pontiac (Pr~tige) Phi 11 ips HIlY 30 000 gsE H H 65 0 800 1 367 2 167
Plrrouth (River Clty) Ca$:sat Ave 30 300 gsf 20 25 ~5 o 660 o 825 1 485
Dodge (lie..stslde) D...ssat Ave 36 700 gsf 30 {9 79 0 817 1 335 2 153
Ford (Duval) Cassat Ave 86 825 gsf 90 109 199 1 037 1 255 2 292
Buick (Key) Quali t y Ci rel e 62,3SD g:sE 36 69 105 o 577 1 107 1 68~
L1.Dcoln-Kercury Quali tr Cirel e 34,900 gsf 3~ 70 104 o 9H 2 006 2 980
(Xorth Florida)
eadJ.ll ac QualIty Circle 51 850 <]sf 52 71 123 1 003 1 369 2 372
(Claude Kalan)
Honda (Luca..5) Reil:s Road 16,650 gat 25 26 51 1 502 1 562 3 063
X15san (Sunrise) Wells Ro~d 25 775 gst 57 66 123 2 211 2 561 ~ 772
Toyota (Sunrise) Phillips HIlY 23,100 gsf 38 5{ 92 1 645 2 338 3 983
8 rundai/ Suharu Blmding BI vd 21, 800 gst 30 33 63 1 376 1 5H 2 890
(Sport)
SalilllJagU1!.r Atlantlc Blvd 19 325 gsf 16 32 48 o 828 1 656 2 484
(Matheny l~ort:s)
Porsche (Brunos) Atlantic Blvd 14 400 gsf 10 16 26 o 6H 1111 1 B06
Kercede:s- Ben1 htlantic Blvd 2S 525 g:sf lB 28 Hi o 705 1 097 1 802
(Gregg Hotors)
ronL SH,SOO g:sf 533 767 1 300 o 98~ 1 H6 2 ~O 1
Ji{ BUClJIOLI. TRAIT I C EJ{ G I fi}'}UXG IJC