AGENDA DOCUMENTS
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk s Office
C8J March 21 2000
0 April 4 2000
0 April 18, 2000
0 May 2, 2000
March 8, 2000 (5'00 p.m.)
o May 16, 2000
o June 6, 2000
o June 20, 2000
o July 5 2000
May 3, 2000 (5'00 p.m.)
March 22, 2000 (5'00 p.m.)
May 17 2000 (5'00 p.m.)
April 5 2000 (5'00 p.m.)
June 7 2000 (5'00 p.m.)
April 19 2000 (5'00 p.m.)
June 21 2000 (5'00 p.m.)
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
o Administrative
[l Consent Agenda
~ Public Hearing
o Bids
o Announcement
o Development Plans
o New Business
o Legal
o Unfmished Business
o Presentation
RECOMMENDATION Please place the request below on the March 21, 2000 City Commission agenda under Legal-
Ordinance, Third Reading. As you may recall, at the February 29,2000 City Commission meeting the request to amend the
previously approved PID master plan in connection with an amendment to the DRI as listed below Staff recommends this
request be approved.
EXPLANATION
PROJECT QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK DRI AMENDMENT #10
AGENT Winston Lee & Associates, Inc
LOCA TION Quantum Park
DESCRIPTION Request to amend the previously approved PID master plan in connection with an amendment to the DRI
as follows:
Change the master plan land use designation of lots 3 and 6 from Office/ Industrial to Industrial Use; lots
39 and 40 from Office/Industrial to Governmental and Institutional Use; lot 50B from Office/Industrial to
Industrial, lots 59, 60 61, and 62 from Office/Industrial to Mixed Use; lots 63, 64 65A, 65B, 66, 67A, 67B
and 67C from Office/Industrial/ Commercial to Mixed Use; lots 76, 81 and 82 from Office/Industrial to
Office/Industrial/Commercial Use; lots 83 84,85,86,87 and 88 from Office/Industrial/Attraction and
Recreation to Mixed Use; and lot 91 from Office/Industrial/Commercial to Attraction and Recreation Use
PROGRAM IMPACT N/A
FISCAL IMP ACT N/ A
ALTERNATIVES.N/A
Department of Development Director City Manager's Signature
\JJ
~",) d..h.v ~ U1i'~ ti'W-'PF
Planning and Zo ing Director City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
).ISHRDATAIPLANNINGISHAREDlWPlPROJECTSIQUANTIJM 2000IDRI\AGENDA REQUEST FOR CC 3-21-3RD RDG.DOC
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
o December 21 1999
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
December 8, 1999 (S'OO p.m.)
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
o February IS, 2000
[8J February 29 2000
o March 7 2000
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
February 2, 2000 (S'OO p.m.)
o January 4 2000
December 22. 1999 (S'OO p.m.)
February 16,2000 (S'OO p.m.)
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
o Administrative
o Consent Agenda
o Public Hearing
o Bids
o Announcement
o Development Plans
o New Business
[8J Legal
o Unfmished Business
o Presentation
RECOMMENDATION Please place the request below on the February 29, 2000 City Commission agenda under Legal
Ordinance - 151 Reading. The Planning and Development Board with unanimous vote, recommended approval including
omitting staff conditions #2, #3, #4, #6, #9, and #10, in part, based on their finding that the subject request is not a substantial
change to the master plan and therefore additional information is not needed. The Board does, however, recommend an
additional condition that limits Quantum Park to a maximum of 500 dwelling units. For further details pertaining to this
request see attached Department of Development Memorandum No PZ 00- 037, and attached Ordinance.
EXPLANATION
PROJECT QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK DRI AMENDMENT #10
AGENT Winston Lee & Associates, Inc
LOCA TION Quantum Park
DESCRIPTION Request to amend the previously approved PID master plan in connection with an amendment to the DR!
as follows:
Change the master plan land use designation of lots 3 and 6 from Office/ Industrial to Industrial Use; lots
39 and 40 from Office/Industrial to Governmental and Institutional Use, lot 50B from Office/Industrial to
Industrial, lots 59, 60 61, and 62 from Office/Industrial to Mixed Use; lots 63, 64, 65A, 65B, 66, 67A, 67B
and 67C from Office/lndustriaV Commercial to Mixed Use; lots 76, 81 and 82 from Office/Industrial to
Office/lndustriaVCommercial Use; lots 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 and 88 from Office/IndustriaVAttraction and
Recreation to Mixed Use; and lot 91 from Office/lndustriaVCommercial to Attraction and Recreation Use.
PROGRAM IMPACT N/A
FISCAL IMPACT N/A
ALTERNATIVES. N/A
Development Department Director
City Manager's Signature
7l- LJ ?_-'~
Planning and Zon' ector
City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
\\CH\MAIN\SHRDA T AIPI.nning\SHAREDlWP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM 2oo01DRl\DRIA AGE]\O'DA REQUEST 2-29-00 1ST RDG doc
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO PZ 00-037
TO
Chairman and Members
Planning and~ev fopment Board
Lusia Galav
Senior Plann
February 17, 2000
FROM
DATE
SUBJECT
Quantum Park - DRIA 00-001/MPMD 00-001
Master Plan Amendment #10 - Quantum Park and Village
NATURE OF REQUEST
Quantum Park of Commerce is a partially built-out Development of Regional Impact (DRI)
comprised of 553 13 acres, zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID) It is located on the
west side of 1-95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton Canal - (C-16) (See
attached Exhibit "A" - Location Map) The applicant, MFT Development, Inc. is requesting an
amendment to the Quantum Park DRI Development Order (0 0 ) adopted December 4, 1984 by
Ordinance No 84-51 The original DO was subsequently amended nine (9) times by
Ordinance Nos 86-11,86-37,88-3,94-10,94-51,96-33,96-65,97-20 and 99-05 The current
Master Plan for Quantum Park is provided in Exhibit "B" - Existing Master Plan. Amendment
#10 proposes to once again change the approved uses on several lots in the Master Plan
mainly to allow for a mixed use development called "Quantum Park and Village" The proposed
changes to the Master Plan are depicted in Exhibit "C" - Proposed Master Plan and described
as follows
1) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lots 3 and 6 from Office/industrial to Industrial
use,
2) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lots 39 and 40 from OfficellndustriaJ to
Governmental and Institutional use,
3) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lot SOB from Office/Industrial to Industrial,
4) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lots 59 60, 61 and 62 from Office/Industrial
to Mixed Use,
5) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lots 63, 64, 65A, 65B, 66 67 A, 67B and 67C
from Officellndustrial/Commercial to Mixed Use
6) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lots 76, 81 and 82 from Office/Industrial to
Office/Industrial/Commercial use
7) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lots 83, 84, 85 86, 87, and 88 from
Office/Industrial/Attraction and Recreation to Mixed Use, and
8) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lot 91 from Office/Industrial/Commercial to
Attraction and Recreation use
BACKGROUND
An amendment to a Development of Regional Impact (DRl) is first and foremost governed by
Florida Statutes Chapter 380 06 (19) - Substantial Deviations The applicant has submitted a
Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) in accordance with the statutory requirements The NOPC
is reviewed by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council (RPC) and the City The DCA and the RPC review the proposed
NOPC and provide comments following the procedures outline in Chapter 380 06 (19)
The City's Land Development Regulations Chapter 1 5 Sec. 4 3A requires a preliminary review
by the Planning and Development Board of an amendment to a DRI Chapter 380 06 F S
requires that the local governing body hold a public hearing to review and approve the NOPC
The City Commission is required to determine whether the proposed change to the Quantum
Park DRI is or is not a substantial deviation as defined in Chapter 380 06 (19) If it is determined
that the requested change is a substantial deviation then further review will be required pursuant
to the statutory requirements If the City Commission determines that the proposed change is
not a substantial deviation then they may take action to approve or deny the requested change
The original DRI Development Order adopted a Master Plan for Quantum Park. That Master
Plan has been amended over the years the latest change being made in March, 1999 The
proposed Amendment #10 alters the approved land uses for that Master Plan Therefore the
review of the DRI amendment also constitutes a review of the changes to the Master Plan for
Quantum Park. In addition to the state statutes, staff has reviewed the Master Plan in
accordance with Land Development Regulations Chapter 2, Section 7, Planned Industrial
Development and Chapter 3, Master Plan Approval. First review comments were generated and
are attached as Exhibit "0" The applicant requested an expedited review schedule agreeing to
waive the opportunity of a second review by the TRC
ANAL YSIS
Notice of Proposed Chanqe(NOPC) - Substantial Deviation
The criteria for determining if a proposed change to a DRI is a substantial deviation are outlined
in Chapter 380 06 (19) In reviewing the statute section staff determined that at least five of the
criteria apply to the proposed change for Quantum Park DRI The first three criteria fall under
subsection (b) which reads as follows "Any proposed change to a previously approved
development of regional impact or development order condition which either individually or
cumulatively with other changes exceeds any of the following criteria shalf constitute a
substantial deviation and cause the development to be subject to further development-of-
regional-impact review without the necessity for a finding of same by the local
government:" The applicable criteria under this subsection are discussed below
1 Chapter 380 06(19)(b)9 , An increase in the number of dwelling units by 5 percent
or 50 dwelling units, whichever is greater
2
The proposed change introduces a new land use category into the DRI Master Plan -
Mixed Use The Mixed Use category includes an addition of 500 residential dwelling
units The proposed change exceeds this criteria Based on several conversations with
representatives at DCA, additional criteria apply in the case of a new land use not
previously introduced in the DRI In this case the criteria outlined in Chapter
380 06(19)(e)5 a. applies That criteria is discussed below and would over ride the
determination above
2. Chapter 380 06(19){b)10 , An increase in commercial development by 6 acres of
land area or by 50,000 square feet of gross floor area, or of parking spaces
provided for customers for 300 cars or a 5-percent increase in any of these
whichever is greater
The proposed change indicates an increase in the commercial square footage of
301 880 square feet. The existing Master Plan and Development Order limit the
commercIal square footage to a maximum of 426,888 The proposed Master Plan (Note
#2) and Development Order language limit the commercial square footage to 728,768
This constitutes a 7071 % increase in permitted commercial square footage The
proposed change exceeds this criteria However, because the proposal also decreases
office uses, Chapter 380 06(19)(e)5 c applies This requirement allows the consideration
of net changes resulting from the reduction in square footage in one category to offset
increases in another use category That criteria is discussed below Because the
applicant has failed to provide the Substantial Deviation Determination Chart as required
to properly evaluate the net change this criteria cannot be analyzed properly The
applicant has been requested to provide the chart.
3 Chapter 380 06(19){b)15, A 15-percent increase in the number of external vehicle
trips generated by the development above that which was projected during the
original development-of-regional-impact review
The applicant submitted a brief traffic analysis with the NOPC that provides trip
generation for the entire DRI by proposed land use only This analysis indicates that a
total of 63 737 trips will be generated which is 15 trips less then the 63 752 vested for
the DRI Staff determined that the analysis provided by the applicant was not sufficient to
determine the impacts of the proposed change and requested that additional information
be provided The data request was included in the 1 sl review comments attached as
Exhibit 0" In addition, there is a requirement in the DRI Amendment #8 adopted by
Ordinance No 097-20 that any future amendment involving a change to the permitted
land uses must provide a traffic study that is to be reviewed by an independent traffic
consultant at the expense of the applicant. McMahon and Associates is providing the
independent review of the traffic analysis The review is ongoing at this time The results
will be available to the City Commission for the scheduled Public Hearing on March 7
2000
The fourth and fifth criteria which are applicable for review of this proposed change are provided
in Chapter 380 06(19)(e)5 which states "The following changes to an approved development of
regional impact shall be presumed to create a substantial deviation Such presumption may
be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence"
4 Chapter 380 06(19)(e)5.a, A change proposed for 15 percent or more of the
acreage to a land use not previously approved in the development order
3
The proposed change introduces a new category of land use identified as Mixed Use
This new land use category is proposed to include a mix of commercial, office and
residential uses The residential use is an entirely new use for this DRI development. At
present the PID zoning regulations Chapter 2 Section 7 F prohibits residential uses
except for hotels and motels The applicant has requested a code revision to allow
residential uses in a PID in excess of 500 acres The Mixed Use category will include
62 38 acres which is 11 27% of the total 553 13 acres comprising the Quantum Park
DRI The proposed change does not exceed this criteria
5 Chapter 380 06(19){e)5 c., Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (b) to the
contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous increases and decreases
of at least two of the uses within a authorized multiuse development of regional
impact which was originally approved with more than three uses specified in
3800651 (3){c), (d), (f) and (g) and residential use.
As part of the NOPC application the applicant is to complete a "Substantial Deviation
Determination Chart" This requirement is also addressed in Chapter 380 06(19)(e)4 ,
which states Any submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved
development shall include a description of individual changes previously made to the
development, including changes previously approved by the local government. The local
government shall consider the previous and current changes in deciding whether such
changes cumulatively constitute a substantial deviation requiring further development-of-
regional- impact review" The applicant has failed to provide this chart citing that it has
not been done since the Second Amendment to the Development Order and because of
the numerous changes to the project, completing the table would not be productive Staff
and DCA disagree with this argument. The scope of the proposed change requested in
this NOPC requires that the Substantial Deviation Determination Chart be submitted
The information necessary to make a determination based on this criteria would be
provided in the chart. Because of insufficient data, staff is unable to make a
determination regarding this criteria at this time
Conclusion
If the proposed change meets anyone of the first three criteria analyzed above then it is a
substantial deviation and is subject to further development-of-regional-impact-review If it meets
either of the last two criteria it is presumed to be a substantial deviation and may be rebutted by
clear and convincing evidence At this time staff continues to review the evidence provided by
the applicant. The traffic impacts are under study at this time and additional information has
been requested It is also necessary for the applicant to provide the Substantial Deviation
Determination Chart to clarify any further substantial deviation claims No substantial deviation
recommendation can be made until all the evidence requested has been provided by the
applicant and reviewed by staff DCA and the RPC
Master Plan Modification
The proposal submitted for the NOPC modifies the approved Master Plan for the Quantum Park
DRI The nature of the changes to the Master Plan fall into two categories The first set of
changes are housekeeping items to reflect the uses which are existing at this time The second
4
set of changes introduce into the Master Plan the 62.38 acre mixed use development known as
Quantum Village" A descriptive summary of these changes is provided below
Lots 3 and 6
The land use designations for these lots have been changed to Industrial (I) from
Officellndustrial (011) The change is being made to be consistent with the approved site plans
for warehouse, distribution and storage facilities These facilities are Bocar properties, 4 075
acres (Lot 3) and Stanton Magnetics, 2.232 acres (Lot 6)
Lots 39 and 40
The land use for these two lots has been changed to Governmental and Institutional (G&I) from
Office/industrial These lots were purchased by the Palm Beach County School Board and are
used for parking purposes The total acreage of the two lots is 5 008
Lot 50B
This 4 250 acre lot has been changed from Officellndustrial (01) to Industrial (I) No explanation
was given
Lots 76, 81, 82
These lots have been changed from the Office/industrial (01) land use category to the
Office/Industrial/Commercial (OIC) category The previous DRI Amendment #9 changed them to
their current (01) designation from the proposed (OIC) designation without consent from the
subject property owner No other explanation was provided for this change These three lots
comprise 12.823 acres
Lot 91
This lot has been changed from OfficellndustriallCommercial (OIC) to Attraction and Recreation
(AR) This change is made to reflect the approved development for a dual ice rink - skating
facility known as "Frozen Ponds" Tract 91 is comprised of 6550 aces The (AR) land use
designation proposed for this site is being reviewed for appropriateness by the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council They expressed concern to staff whether Frozen Ponds meets the
DRI definition for the AR land use category The RPC comments, if any, will be available for the
scheduled public hearing for this NOPC, and could lead to maintaining this lot with the
"Commercial" designation, and various other changes to the lot use designations to offset this
unanticipated "Commercial" acreage increase
Lots 59, 60. 61. 62, 63. 64. 65-A. 65-B. 66. 67-A.67-B, 67-C, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87. and 88
These 18 Lots are being changed from Office/Industrial (01), OfficellndustriallCommercial
(OIC) and Office/ Industrial or Attraction and Recreation (01 & AR) to Mixed Use (MU) The
Mixed Use category is not clearly defined at this time but will include a combination of office,
commercial and residential land uses A conceptual site plan titled "Quantum Park and Village"
was submitted with the application This site plan represents a type of "urban village" concept
that is the departure from the original intent of the Quantum Park DRI specifically due to the
introduction of residential land use A total of 500 residential dwelling units are proposed for this
5
site The conceptual site plan is not the subject of any approvals at this time The total land area
for these 18 Jots is 62 38 acres
The major focus of the analysis for this Master Plan amendment is the proposal for the Mixed
Use land use category The Quantum Park DRI has been amended nine times over the years
which is not unusual for a DRI of this type The Florida Statute governing the DRI process
Chapter 380 06(19) provides for and anticipates amendments stating that 'There are a variety
of reasons why a developer may wish to propose changes to an approved development of
regional impact, including chanqed market conditions
The Proposed change requested by Amendment #10 is a significant departure from the existing
character of development for the Quantum Park DRI This proposed change to the Master Plan
was analyzed from two perspectives The first is the potential for creating additional regional
impacts The second is the consistency and compatibility of the proposed change with the
regulations and policies adopted by the City through the Comprehensive Plan Land
Development Regulations and other applicable studies such as the Visions 20/20 plan
Regional Impacts
A development has gone through the DRI process because the projected impacts are
considered regional in nature Any change to that development must be analyzed to determine if
the changes proposed create additional impacts above and beyond what was originally
identified and mitigated In the case of the Quantum park DRI the major issue is whether there
will be an increase in traffic resulting from the land use redistribution/redesignation
A provision in Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park development order requires that Ii A traffic
study shall be submitted with any future application requesting a change in use designations on
any lot. The City shall hire, at the applicant's expense, an independent traffic consultant to
review the study" In accordance with this provision the City has retained McMahon and
Associates to conduct the review of the applicants traffic study
In analyzing the traffic impacts, trip generation and operational characteristics of those trips are
taken into consideration The applicant's initial traffic study provided trip generation data only for
the proposed change Staffs 151 review comments requested additional data including AM and
PM peak analysis, trip distribution and assignment and a comparative trip generation table The
applicant provided the additional data and it was forwarded to McMahon and Associates for
their review McMahon and Associates has also requested additional data from the applicant
that has been forwarded to the applicants traffic consultant. At this time the analysis for traffic
impacts is on-going No determination has been made The recommendation of the traffic
consultant will be available for the Public Hearing on the amendment request.
The Department of Community Affairs and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council focus
their review of the amendment on regional issues exclusively Staff has received preliminary
comments from FOOT regarding traffic which also requests additional information be provided
by the applicant. Both DCA and the RPC comments on this project will be available on or after
February 25 2000, which is their deadline for review of this amendment. Comments from these
agencies will be inserted into the analysis once received
6
Consistency and Compatibility with City Policies
Comprehensive Plan - In the NOPC for this amendment, the applicant responded negatively to
Question 11 asking whether the proposed change will require an Amendment to the City's
Comprehensive Plan citing Policy 1 16 1 which outlines the permitted uses in the Industrial
category What is at question is the residential use proposed with this amendment. It is true that
the Industrial category allows those uses permitted in the Office Commercial and Local Retail
Commercial land use categories if approved as such in a planned industrial district. The Local
Retail Commercial land use category does permit multi-family residential development.
However the narrative providing for the permitted uses in the Industrial category speaks to
Industrial and Planned Industrial Development uses only including ancillary commercial and
office uses It does not mention residential nor was it the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to
permit residential uses in the Industrial category The data and analysis for this land use
category does not take into account residential use
The applicant cites the City's Comprehensive Plan objectives and policies promoting mixed use
development. This Objective 1 15 states "The City shall encourage planned development
projects which are sensitive to characteristics of the site and to surrounding land uses, and
mixed use projects in locations which are appropriate and utilize other innovative methods of
regulating land development. The accompanying policies address commercial/residential mixed
uses being allowed in the Mixed Use and Local Retail Commercial land use category No
mention is made of allowing them in the Industrial category The mixed uses promoted for the
Industrial land use category are commercial/industrial and commercial/warehouse uses
There are two policies in the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan which seek
to ensure the continued availability of land for industrial uses These policies are being
amended in the EAR process and the amended version is provided below
Policy 1 19 2 The City shall provide continued effort to allow for industrial acreage which can
accommodate the approximate industrial employment which has been projected in the Future
Land Use Element, and prohibit conversion of land desionated Industrial" on the currently
adopted Future Land Use Map unless such conversion would oenerate a ranoe of employment
choices for current and future residents. provide ooods and services of reoional importance, and
retain reoional fiscal and economic sionificance.
Policy 1 19 4 The City shall continue to encourage and enforce the development of Industrial
land as industrial parks or concentrated industrial areas in order to maximize the linkage
between complementary industries
During the review of the last several changes to the Quantum Park PID/DRI staff has
emphasized the potential loss of parcels designated specifically for industrial use As stated in
the staff report for Amendment #9 this conversion began with the accommodation for the
planned high school which removed approximately 40 adjacent acres (12 parcels) from the
Industrial" category and included the conversion of several parcels from "Industrial" or Office
to Commercial" for the Carmax project. The proposed change for Amendment #10 continues
the trend away from a strictly industrial park development to an expanded mixed use concept
allowing a variety of land uses including residential
It is evident from the review of the Comprehensive Plan that the current policies of the City
maintain and promote the availability of land for industrial development as well as provide for
certain traditional types of mixed use development. The amendment as proposed challenges
7
those policies Although no additional acreage is proposed the amendment changes the
distribution of land uses in the Quantum Park DR' by reducing industrial and office uses,
increasing commercial uses and adding a residential component. One purpose of the Future
Land Use Element of the Comprehensive plan is to provide for a balance of land uses to meet
the needs of the City and it's residents This also assists the City to determine and provide the
necessary public services for the anticipated population and development. The proposed
change for Quantum Park does affect the data and analysis used to provide the basis for the
land use policies and distribution In particular the Comprehensive Plan projected a surplus of
commercial land use without further increases by the build-out date The proposed Quantum
Park amendment does not add additional commercial acreage but does add a significant
amount of commercial square footage Also despite the supporting role that residential uses
have in the success of mixed use projects the addItion of the residential units will affect the
population projections for the city which in turn impacts local resources such as parks schools
and other public services
Approval of the amendment as proposed requires the City to adjust it's policies regarding mixed
use development and to assess the impacts that the proposed change will have regarding the
Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan At a minimum, a Comprehensive Plan
amendment would be required for the current proposal to allow for residential and mixed use
development as proposed During this process the City will be able to evaluate the impacts of
the DRI land use changes as they relate to the data and policies in the Comprehensive Plan
Land Development Requlations - The Quantum Park DRI is zoned Planned Industrial
Development (PID) As stated in Land Development Regulations Chapter 2 Section 7 Planned
Industrial Districts "The purpose of the PID district is to provide a zoning classification for light
industrial development that will better satisfy current demands for light industrial zoned lands by
encouraging development which will reflect changes in the technology and land development
and relate the development of land to the specific site and conserve natural amenities" Once
again the proposed change puts more emphasis on the mixed use concept favoring commercial
uses rather than industrial as is the intent of the code In addition, the list of prohibited uses in
the PID zoning district includes residential uses except for hotels and motels The proposed
amendment to the Quantum Park Master Plan requires that the PID section of Chapter 2 Zoning
be amended to permit the addition of 500 residential units The applicant has submitted a code
revision application They are proposing language that will allow residential uses only in a PID of
over 500 acres That application is being reviewed simultaneously and is the subject of another
staff report.
Conclusion
The proposed change to the Quantum Park DRI/PID requires the City to shift its policies
regarding industrial land use In order to accommodate the type of mixed use development
proposed for this PID the Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations must be
amended
RECOMMENDATIONS
Pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 380 06(19) Substantial Deviations the applicant has
attempted to justify that the proposed change does not constitute a substantial deviation to the
Quantum Park DRI The applicant must provide clear and convincing evidence supporting this
assertion The applicant must provide additional information before a determination of no
8
substantial deviation is made by the City The additional information which must be provided
includes
1 Traffic analysis data requested by the City and McMahon and Associates which analysis
is found by McMahon and Associates not to create additional regional impacts
2 The Substantial Deviation Determination Chart showing that the increases and
decreases in the Quantum park DRI meet the threshold requirements of Florida Statutes
Chapter 380 06(19)(e)5 c.
Regarding the modification to the Quantum Park Master Plan staff recommends that the request
be conditionally approved subject to the applicant filing and receiving approval for a text
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and the approval of the zoning code revision allowing
residential uses in a PID
SIPLANNINGISHAREOIWPIPROJECTSIOUANTUM 20COIORI MPMO OO-OO1\STAFF REPORT. DOC
9
L~CATIOt\ - MAP -
JII/ ,","i";", "'" """"'" ,BUANTUM PARK
... J -.~
~ ,~ wu-'\a' rT I J / I ,I i ' ' , r'
J · Fk .. J' 'f NI~T n,l- -
~ ~'L" ....... 1 ~_' C IT y g I VI 1
r' ~ c:';;: ""..,J= .......---'\ ~ j;;':'-1~i '
_~ ~~ =i'.J.~~ . ~I" trf( I
r ~r ? ~J:4 q ~".r~ ~ '~~ ~'~,t i
E ~l~r,:'-'Y:~~ rJ/ ~ l-,'1~^~. (. - i
~ S "'i~~ ~ '\ I ~ - _\ -~\~
_fJ 03>'~ '1~' J .,;f "y~r \~b:J,1,
~.:" , ,. '.' I I ~_ I
)) lo 1 ! "f ri' --r ...:::; . _I'
~ @:3' \ '~, i~ 0/':' ; I >~~/;\..~ '. \ ""'-; -=~~ ~ , lj i
_ (_ " . L ..... ,_ _. " ~ ~. . 7 '1 I
.::J ,~~.' !,~ -
; .. 1/ \"', . I -~~O~ ". .:.. "-'~ ' · " I~
_" "/. _ _ . II I: T. W I~ ~',," ..... ,,~ j.(~ ---.J I ;
-; ;, " ":;fJ-....:; _ _ \ >.:q,;:::,.. ;~{.~ /i'il '~I ~ '{ .
I -" / j /.'/ ---.I/J....f!J..TU'" v... ,.....1 /,.,.r-1 ~~ 1I
j I, !, ,f '" ~ '- c::.JI i ~v.. 'a II. I
- -
~ PIP .~ - -h
Ji. "MCTC~OLA~" ~ / /I
_ :'.,~ ! . !/~'f:;+~
~ '.. ... ". ~'~ ~.... ..~ Z;;"A ..~ ~I~ f m ., \ ~ ~ Jl/~/'
L ' \ \I I1I1 i ,i Ifiij'I'I' .....rTm. ...:. T1I I I
_ :, ,= ~,~:!,I-'! E c:~"-l l:gj! ", III~' '" it. '
_ \ \~ 2:, i~';-. - ~ >--,,' =~7 9h! ~
- ~ 14, %\X,....:: -. I-:-~ ~. ~
~ ~I ' , ..~ '.,' - _ ~ 0 1/8 1.lIlES(//: } IJI~
~'I A,AA '\;t\.7m.::r\i 1111111 r;, J~
~I Jr lEI 0 400 BOC =EET '-.J/ ?
__________ ____ _ .__ oz-ZoOO ,fT"
t:J\Hltjll
A
T
- ~,,'
EXHIBIT liB"
...,
.
I ...
u
~ aW . ,...
~ on .. U"I ,,",~G
. 7L.
Q. "
~X
V1
::Iz~
Z~
Q~ ,
< _ a >-
UN
0 ~
....I~ 0
0 z
::)
N 0
.... CD
oD '"
~
Z Q.
0
>=
U
...
V1
~
~ :
~ -
. I ......
; J !!!!~qiHH
! ! :;;:i:~lr:r;
o --_.:. 7.
~ I! .
~ s r~
i.H fm
" t~t.
I !!l: ;;p r
W~ ~<.<.I ~
1!I-b~a= · !
~~_g~-df "9~-S
,_ .!!!: ali-
;_ 8 i . _ ~. - .. E 9 .. l!
_..;i;~iA~i !
..,~
r----
;U
..a::
HI
: So I
'I I il i ii
:;f!~ f!!'
"j IH -;1;
~ .. hI
i g'f"iihi!
: I li~~5 i;:, l
f ~ J2!.I!~f. c
i' H:ijH,:: !
I. :111 "gH !
. j' l;i!I~J r
~ Ii !l11;i!jh !
_3~1_-L18IHX3 --'
-/
-
-
'-'
-
-
r-
-
co
.
...L.
><
.l.J
~
f ~ ~ ~ -
___ t. ..-
., __.:r: : !
~~~
, I~!II
_ ! C:-.,}-J ~!
~ :. / ---J ! I.
, ~ I: J I i
! 3!:-:!: I : i
.! ! C' ~: ~ ;! :1 ~:
~~_.. I ~\ -4 ~i ~. i
~I'!~!
i I Ii,
I I
, !
EXHIBIT
f I I ~
i
"e"
.
..
~
.
. ;;
5 --
~ "'
""
:t
- .
:-? ,:
~1 :
g .::;~ i
i~~
m-i;;!;
-
: j ;
<:-
~ ; J"
--
::: ?=
~=~
- -
':'::
..,.
~;~
~::::
~ =s
~~3
~""
- .'
v,
::~ ~<#'
~:
.: 2
.'
~
-'
."
""
~
.. .. :nw:N "....""
"" C'C .. "'~ 0
-
2:
! II i
) II
s" :.I
I_I~ ~
~I fi it;
;-\!f ,!I;I
~
-r:;
I
I
I
I
~' ~
. -
U
.,,"'J
':::~;;-5::~
}f.;~
2S 1;;'&
~I !
,
i
i
1
~
~
i
ii
!~
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
5 ;
~~
t :a i~ ~..i
! I~: "!~.
.,.:~ f.:-:
!i~::. ~~~::
i ~:3' ;f-"'~;'
i!~ ~: ~ ~~~I"
'f a'~=,~.fhi !
z! s l!li=;. i
I! ~;~1~"Z: :I>
=i g~:;~~~H: .~
g', d::~S:f"
;; illli!:W I ·
,_ J _ 0 \,!
r'"~l~"s- "
;;
..I"':' ;~ :~O~C...
I I
lJ
'-,
Cl
EXHIBIT "D"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: QUANTUM PARK DR!
File number. MPMD 00-001
Reference. REVISED 1st Review, New Site Plan. File with, January 11, 2000 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp markmcr
-.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments NONE X
UTILITIES
I The master plan indicates a slgmficant change in usage from office/ X
commercial/industrial to mixed use in several locations. Addmg a
residential component will require are-review of the water and sanitary
sewer demands to be placed on our systems. Please have the applicant
provide estimated demands for all of the proposed changes.
FIRE
Comments NONE X
POLICE
Comments. NONE X
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments.
2. Submit a letter describmg the proposed changes. X
3 To venfy complIance with the maximum mtenslties that are described X
withm note number two, submit square footage computations of the gross
floor area of the existing sites that have development order approval.
Identify the lot number and total floor area square footage of all sites with
development order approval. Total the floor area and categorize them m the
land uses that are identified in note two
ENGINEERlNG DIVISION
Comments NONE X
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments. NONE X
FORESTERJENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments NONE X
PLANNING AND ZONING
Page 2
Quantum Park DR!
File No MPMD 00-00 I
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments.
4 The Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) document whIch accompanIes thIS X
Master Plan reVISion does not account for Quantum Lots 83-88 m the
narrative provIded for QuestIOn #5 Add these lots to the lIst as 5 11
changmg the use from "01 or AR" to"MU" as shown on the Master SIte
Plan and provided in the acreage table on page 4 of the NOPC report. Also,
for your records, the 8th Amendment was adopted by the City on June 3,
1997 by Ordmance No 097-20 The NOPC document, page 5 shows the
date of adoptIOn as March 17, 1997
5 Revise Item #2 under the Notes sectIOn on the Master Site Plan sheet to X
reflect the uses and intenSItIes as proposed by Amendment # 1 0
6 Under the condItIOns of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park D 0 and X
Chapter 3, ArtIcle IV of the Land Development Regulations a traffic
analYSIS IS requIred for thiS Master Plan approval In addItIOn a traffic
analYSIS is required to assIst m determmmg If the proposed changes will
generate additIOnal regIOnal impacts pursuant to Chapter 380 06 (18)
Substantial Deviations. A traffic statement was provided but is insufficient
to provide the analYSIS reqUIred. ProvIde a traffic analYSIS for Amendment
# 1 0 which at a minImum includes
- An AM and PM peak analysis for uses proposed III Amendment #10,
particularly the 500 residential umts,
- Trip distribution and assignment for the proposed use changes,
- ComparatIve trip generatIOn table providing data for the uses originally
approved, those recently approved (Amendment #9) and those uses
proposed for Amendment # 1 0
This traffic analYSIS will be reviewed by an independent traffic
consultant as reqUired by Quantum D 0 Amendment #8
7 Quantum Park DR! development IS delinquent in provldmg the reqUired X
annual report for the year 1998 In addition, the 1999 annual report is due
February 15, 2000 Annual reports must be provided in order to maintam the
eXistence of the DO and the vested rights associated With It. As a condition
of approval of this Master Plan Amendment #10 the 1998-99 Annual
report may be combined and submitted to the City's Planning and
Zoning Department no later than May 1, 2000.
8 Industrial tracts #47-A and #47-B are not labeled on the Master SIte Plan. X
Label these tracts.
9 Approval of the Master Plan IS contmgent upon a findmg of no substantial X
deViation by the City The applIcant must provide additional informatIOn
before a determinatIon of no substantIal deviatIOn is made. The additional
mformation includes
- Traffic analYSIS data requested by the City and McMahon and
ASSOCiates which analysis is found by McMahon and Associates not
Page 3
Quantum Park DR!
File No MPMD 00-001
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
to create additIOnal regional Impacts.
- The Substantial Deviation Determination Chart showing that the
Increases and decreases in the Quantum Park DR! meet the
threshold requirements ofFlonda Statutes Chapter 380 06(19)(e)
5c
10 Approval of the Master Plan IS contingent upon the applIcant filing for and X
reCeIVing approval for a text amendment to the ComprehensIve Plan to
permIt resIdential use in the Industrial land use category
II Approval of the Master Plan is contingent upon the approval of the X
applicant's code reVISIon request to permit resIdentIal development for large
scale projects in a PID zoning dIstrict.
ADDlTIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD COMMENTS
12 Delete comment #2 X
13 Delete comment #3 X
14 Delete comment #4 X
15 Delete comment #6 X
16 Delete comment # 9 X
17 Delete comment #10 X
18 The Quantum Park PID master plan shall be lImIted to a maximum of 500 X
dwellIng Units.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS
19 To be determined.
J \SHRDATAIPLAN:'i[;';Q\SHAREDlWPIPROJECTS\QUANTUM 2000IDRl1-IPMD OO-OOI\COl'o'DITIONS OF APPROVAL CC -29-00 DOC