Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH DEe 21m m OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER Date November 30, c... Ed Harmening, Mayor Jose Aguila, Vice Mayor Lynne Matson, Mayor Pro Tern David Katz, Commissioner Bob Walshak, Commissioner AS REQUESTED FOR YOUR INFORMATION SUBJECT: QUANTUM PARK For your information a meeting was held several weeks ago with representatives from Southeast Atlantic Corporation (Canada Dry), publix Supermarkets, Quantum Corporate Park, and City staff involving the landscape buffer along the southern border of Quantum Park and the problem with continuous noise emanating from the several businesses located in the southern portion of the park Mr Ron wickham, resident of Sky Lake, and located directly across the canal from Canada Dry and Publix, was also in attendance Southeast Atlantic (Canada Dry) indicated that they are not a 24 hour operation, and they have taken several measures to abate noises by ceasing receiving after 8 00 PM (some exceptions though) and limiting the use of the intercom system They noted that their fleet garage closes at 6 00 PM In summary, they felt that noise is really not an issue with them at this time publix warehouse indicated that they have taken measures including cutting off the intercoms at 11 00 PM and limiting their hours involving hooking up trailers till 10 00 PM They did state that certainly noise is caused by the hooking up of the trailers however, that is part of their operations (and will be limited henceforth based on time of day) As for Quantum Corporate Park and the need to process a master plan modification for the landscape buffer along the south border of the area, Paul Smith mentioned that a letter should be written to him addressing this matter, and he in turn will set the gears in motion to accommodate this task Said letter was written a week or so ago to Mr Smith on this master plan modification for the buffer It appeared that all persons in attendance were in agreement with the measures to be taken to abate noise from the businesses, and I feel that Mr Wickham was satisfied with what he heard from both Southeast Atlantic and publix Hopefully this matter will be able to be put to rest, except for processing the master plan ,-~..---~'_""""- Sj,(~~t:~ '; ~ ~ ~ 1 ~l Memo to Mayor Cl City Commission RE Quantum Park ~vember 30, 1993 Page Two -modification for the buffer at the time application is made by Quantum Park Should you have any questions relative to this subject matter please feel free to contact me --;~ L_/_ __~;':~ '3:/' Scott Miller city Manager JSM smb Attachment c Carrie Parker, Assistant City Manager Tambri Heyden, Acting Director of Planning & Zoning Ron Wickham Central File rflu City of 'Boynton tJ3eacli 100 'E. flJoynton tJJeadi 'Boukvartf P.O 'B~310 'Boynton 'Beadi, %nitfa 33425-0310 City 'JfafL (407) 375-6000 7'JU. (407) 375-6090 November 16, 1993 Paul Smith Melvin Simon & Associates Fashion Mall at Plantation 321 N University Drive Plantation, Florida 33324 RE: QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK BlJ.t".t"&<. Dear Paul As discussed at last Friday morning's meeting (being November 12, 1993) reference the landscape buffer requirements along the south and west borders of the park, a master plan modification for clarification purposes on said perimeter buffer is still an outstanding item that needs to be addressed by Quantum. An application along with design drawings must be filed with the Planning and Zoning Department to initiate this process Please contact Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning and Zoning Director, at 375-6264 for further details Enclosed herewith please find a copy of memorandum number 93-83C from Carrie Parker, Assistant City Manager, to my attention regarding the buffer wall issue at Quantum Park, and providing additional information on this specific subject matter. A copy of the minutes of the October 15, 1993 regular City Commission meeting is also enclosed for your viewing and use. In order to set a definite design of the landscape buffer for detail in future developments along the perimeter of the park, I would appreciate your assistance in moving this project along to completion. The sooner the modification becomes effective the clearer it becomes to potential businesses as to what is expected !jfmPrira ( (;atf1JJaU tn tIU (;u[fstream Letter to Paul Smith, Quantum November 16, 1993 Page Two of the landscape buffer and its respective composition Thank you in advance for your cooperation and prompt attention to this matter Sincerely, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 7~ City Manager JSM smb Enclosures c Mayor & City Commission Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director Ron Wickham Central File m Nov.a. m C/ CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER Date November 2, 1993 Ed Harmening, Mayor Jose Aguila, Vice Mayor Lynne Matson, Mayor Pro Tern David Katz, Commissioner Bob Walshak, Commissioner AS REQUESTED FOR YOUR INFORMATION SUBJECT: QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK Attached hereto for your information please find copies of memos and correspondence regarding the southern district/border of Quantum Park; specifically the buffer wall issue, the loud noises from publix Warehouse, and the landscape buffer of Canada Dry Distribution Center Directing attention to the buffer wall issue, please see memorandum number 93-83C for details As noted, Quantum still needs to proceed with a master plan modification on the perimeter buffers for clarification purposes The past Director of Planning & Zoning, Chris Cutro, was attempting to get this done, however, he achieved no success primarily due to the change in the Park ownership The staff of the Planning Department is still awaiting Quantum's application for this modification Reference the noise emanating from the publix Warehouse, the area representative, Jim Slappey, has issued a notice to the warehouse to cut-off the intercom system and abate horn blowing at night He has also investigated these noise complaints from the residential community and has indicated to Scott Blasie, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, that he has not found noises which he feels would constitute a nuisance Hopefully, Mr Slappey's note will help I have been advised from Code Enforcement that the landscape buffer along the south side of the Canada Dry Distribution Center has been completed (new plantings for the dead ones), in accordance with the approved plan ._~~~~~~-~ ~\ p I~ \~ ll, \!J is \\~~ ~ \~ L L ~\Ui.: UU NO\! - 2 1993 u ! , Memo to Mayor & City Commission RE Quantum Corporate Park November 2, 1993 Page Two Should you have any questions regarding this subject matter, please feel free to contact me 13~r City Manager JSM smb Attachment c Carrie Parker, Assistant City Manager Sue Kruse, City Clerk Tambri Heyden, Acting Director of Planning & Zoning Ron Wickham Central File .--....-.- ill ~ ~ Ie ! ~ 1/1 -' li c ;; NOV - 2 1993 ~ U. ; PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. 1" i ..-........- 1 I -- /! I~~ MEMORANDUM NO 93-83C TO J. Scott Miller City Manager DATE Carrie Parker Assistant City Manager October 21, 1993 FROM SUBJECT Buffer wall Issue at Quantum Park At a recent City Commission meeting the question arose as to whether or not a wall was required specifically behind Southeast Atlantic Corporation (Canada Dry) and more generally if a wall was required around all of the south side of the Industrial Park as it fronted on the canal but the adjacent zoning was residential Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning Director, did some extensive research on this topic and the following information is presented for your review The original PID requirement called for a 40 foot greenbelt when development abutted residential property and a 6 foot wall. Safety Kleen was approved in 1989 with this requirement Southeast Atlantic Corporation (Canada Dry) appeared before the City Commission on October 15, 1991 for site plan approval They submitted a request to change these buffer requirements These changes were reviewed and unanimously approved by the Planning and zoning Board prior to being placed before the City Commission. The following changes that regarded the wall and buffer were made and approved by the City Commission (minutes and agenda back-up attacted) 1 whether a greenbelt is required it will be determined by land use, not zoning Industrial, office, R & D, or commercial uses that abuts residential will have a 40 foot buffer, industrial office, R & D or commercial abutting any of the same uses will have a 25 foot buffer 2 No wall is required (deletion of '11 from Building Department memorandum) 3 Buffers shall be measured from the Quantum Park perimeter property lines inward and water shall be included as an acceptable part of such buffers A minimum of twenty feet of earth shall be provided m OCT li_ 00 PlANNING AND I ~ DEPT. -2- 4 Landscape planting requirements were established, but peri- meter landscape buffering was approved on a lot by lot basis, but must be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Canada Dry's landscaping was planted, however, much of it died and they have been replanting There is still one outstanding item, a master plan modification for clarification purposes, incorporating the results of the October 15, 1991 meeting was never developed and signed by both parties The Planning Department had stated earlier that this Master Plan Modification was a clarification of enforcement between Quantum Associates and the City of Boynton Beach and did not need to be submitted to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Councilor DCA ~~~ Carrie Parker Assistant City Manager CP jc Attachments cc. Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning Director MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 2 project Name: Agent: Owner: _ Location: IlEts<:ription: OCTOBER 15, 1991 Best Homes at Boynton Lakes PUD, Plat 5 Edward J. Kaplan H.M.F. Investments, Inc. Congress Avenue at Plaza Lane, southeast corner SITE PLAN: Request for site plan appro- val to construct 41 townhouses on a 5.5 acre parcel within Boynton Lakes, Plat 5 Mr Cutro stated that staff recommended approval to the Planning & zoning Board. Planning & Zoning requested that the owner obtain, in writing, prior to the Commission meeting, an agreement from the homeowners' association that the problems had been worked out Mr. Cutro suggested that agreement be submitted at the time of final sign-off of the site plans. There are minor problems they are working out He pointed out that Items 6 and 8 in the Planning Memorandum are recommendations, not conditions They are over and above what the Code and plat require The Parks and Recreation question regarding the open space has been resolved The half credit does apply to this property. Edward Kaplan, 4620 W Hawthorne Circle, Hollywood, Florida, is one of the principals in the development of Boynton Lakes, Plat #5 Mr Kaplan stated that they do not agree with the suggestions which are in excess of the Code, but agrees with all of the others City Attorney Cherof wondered if Mr Kaplan understood that unfulfilled conditions could prevent the issuance of building permits. Mr Kaplan understood Motion Commissioner Aguila moved to APPROVE the site plan for Best Homes at Boynton Lakes PUD, Plat 15 for 41 townhouses with conditions Commissioner Matson seconded the motion which carried 4-0. 3 project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Southeast Atlantic Distribution Center Robert E. Bashart, Urban Design Studio Quantum Associates Lot 49, Quantum Park; approximately 400' east of Park Ridge Boulevard and Beta Drive SITE PLAN: Request for site plan appro- val to construct a 63,288 square foot distrib~~ion facility on Lot 49, a 5.72 acre parcel, within Quantum Park Mr cutro stated the applicant requested this item be withdrawn from the Consent Agenda. They wish to comment on some of the items Planning & Zoning unanimously recommended approval of Description: 7 MINUTES - R~LAR CITY COMMISSION MEET~ BOYNTON BEACH, FLORID~ OCTOBER 15, 1991 this site plan subject to the City Attorney determining that the Unity of Control for Lot 49 and 49A is sufficient and deletion of the Building Department comment, and if the City Attorney and staff determines that a buffer wall is not required, the appli- cant sha~~onstruct a chain link fence with vegetative buffer which consists of native hedge material at a minimum height of 2' and a mixture of native canopy trees The subject of buffering was discussed at length at previous meetings. South Florida Water Management District has a per- petual easement over Lot 149A At a meeting with the applicant and Quantum they proposed that there will be a 40' buffer from residential and 25' buffer from other uses. The buffer will include water There is a minimum of 20' of landscaping required The landscaping which will be provided will be over and above the landscaping requirements in effect at the time the site plan is approved, plus an additional tree 12' in height with an 8' canopy for every 25' of rear property and an additional four shrubs to be moved around the property. The buffer will include any plantable area up to the rear of the building. In this particular case, there is no plantable area up to the rear of the building. All of the landscaping will be at the rear of the property line The setback of the building will be measured from the canal. Mr. Cutro believes the setbacks should be measured from the top of the canal bank. They must have control in that area and maintain it This will give the City a firm footing on which to approve plans Each buffer will be installed before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued on the building. This has been a point of argument between the City and Quantum in the past Mr Cutro suggests approving the site plan, adding these stipula- tions and conditions for Lot t49A and with a further stipulation that Quantum provide a master plan modification for the remainder of the site for all of the canals around Quantum Park At the map, Mr. Cutro pointed out that according to Code, the applicant will have to provide 175 hedges and nine trees Additionally, they will be required to provide twelve trees and forty-eight large-scale hedges. Commissioner Aguila feels Quantum has agreed to a good proposal which will solve many problems Anna Cottrell, Planner with Urban Design, 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida, represented the applicant She congratulated staff for the work done on this project She asked that the record reflect the agreement which was reached regarding the buffering requirements for Lot t49A will supercede a number of conditions recommended by staff She proceeded through the Building Department memorandum to delete some of the conditions Item 13 will be eliminated Unity of Title is not 8 MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 15, 1991 possible. The ~nification of the two lots is accomplished with the approval of the site plan No other development can take place Item I~ should be deleted because the setback distance will be tr~om the top of the bank. Item Ill, regarding the buffer wall, will not be required Item #24, regarding landscaping was discussed in detail by Mr Cutro and therefore, this item should be deleted Item #27 should also be deleted because it also refers to the buffering which has been discussed in detail. All other staff conditions are acceptable and the developer is agreeable to them. Ralph Marchese, 1901 Roma Way, read an article which appeared on Page 12 of the Boynton Beach Times dated October 10, 1991, "Key Not the Price". He quoted Mr. Peter Johnson. "Boynton Beach's quality of life swayed the company more than price, he said Really, what our deci- sion was based on, while price is important to us, this community was more important to us, Johnson said Southeast Atlantic looked at several proper- ties in the area that were much less expensive, but they decided to go Quantum, he said However, Johnson said, the new City Commission, elected in March and their vote on the District have affected the company's decision to buy. I do know that having a change in the political culture that governs Boynton Beach, he said, has certainly improved desirability of the site." Mr. Marchese congratulated the Commission for their favorable decision with regard to Quantum Park. Eleanor Shuman, 2520 NE 1st Court, spoke on behalf of the Community Appearance Board. She pointed out that as a result of the last Community Appearance Board meeting, a motion was made to request that the City Commission have Quantum Park meet a requirement to uniformly landscape the peripheral buffer zones She stated there have been many problems dealing with applicants in Quantum because of the lack of this information. Mr. cutro explained that land are very specific. application is approved, will discuss this matter the requirements for land adjacent to It is important that after the first those which follow need to match He with Deutsch Ireland. Mayor Weiner thanked Ms. Shuman for attending the meeting and noted the hard work done by the Community Appearance Board. She feels it is a great relief to the Commission to have Boards such as the CAB which make good recommendations and follow them up by attending the Commission meetings to reiterate their recommen- dations 9 MINUTES - R~LAR CITY COMMISSION MEETI~ BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 15, 1991 Commissioner Ag~ila wondered whether it would be appropriate to discuss the consistent buffering techniques when the master plan modification is discussed Mr. Cutro will attempt to include this ite~_but does not want to slow down the process of the master plan modification. Motion Commissioner Aguila moved to approve the site plan for Southeast Atlantic Distribution on Lot 449 in Quantum Park with the con- ditions as presented exclusive of the Building Department Memorandum 491-358 Items 43, 47, 411, 424 and 427 In addition, approval is conditional with Planning Department's Memorandum .91-265 as presented. Commissioner Matson seconded the motion which carried 4-0 NON-CONSENT AGENDA - NOT UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED BY PLANNING & ZONING None OTHER 1 Review of Brighton Gardens ACLF Site Plan (NW corner of Congress Avenue and Woolbright Road) This item has been moved to Old Business, "B" 2. Excavation and Fill Permit - Boynton Lakes PUD, Plat '5 The City Manager, the Administrative Coordinator of Engineering and Mr Staudinger reviewed all outstanding issues regarding this item A list of three items was generated which the applicant needed to supply before a recotnmendation could be made to go for- ward. The three items deal with: 1) a traffic control plan showing where the barriers would be placed on the street which the trucks will cross; 2) the exact route of the trucks in the fill operation to allow for assessment of pavement damage, and 3) the posting of appropriate surety in the amount of $2,500 in case of damage to the roadway. Items.l and 2 were supplied to Mr. Staudinger this afternoon and Mr Rossi, the applicant's Engineer, was present to discuss the $2,500 bond. All other requirements have been met Rick Rossi, of Rossi, Malavasi, stated that the comments have all been addressed. He explained that the road requiring the surety does not belong to the City. It is owned by the developer. 10 .~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #91-265 FROM J Scott Miller, city Manager <c Christopher Cutro, planning Director TO DATE october 15, 1991 RE Quantum Park Buffer The original P I D for Quantum Park requires a peripheral greenbelt of 40 feet when development is adjacent to residential property In the past it has been interpreted that a 6 foot wall is required in this buffer In Quantum Park property, the developed parcels are not directly adjacent to residential Instead there are a series of intervening lots which will be owned by the C D D and contain canals, canal banks and some land This situation does not require a b foot wall Deutsch Ireland has proposed the following conditions for the buffer areas on canals: ouantum Park P.I.D. GreenBelt Buffers. 1 Whether a greenbelt buffer is required, will be determined by land use not zoning An industrial use, office use, R&D use, or commercial/retail use within Quantum Park that abuts a residential use outside Quantum Park shall have a forty foot wide greenbelt buffer separating such uses from adjacent residential uses An industrial use, office use, R&D use, or commercial/retail use within Quantum Park that abuts any of the same uses outside Quantum Park shall have a twenty-five foot greenbelt buffer between the uses 2 All buffers shall be measured from Quantum Park peria.ter Property lines inward and water shall be included as "0* acceptable part of such buffers Whenever necessary, the buffer dimensions shall be increased such that a minimum of twenty feet of earth is provided in a continuous fashion Such areas shall be planted in accordance with number 3 below 3 All planting plans for the greenbelt buffer shall be submitted to the city of Boynton Beach for approval when development plans for the adjoining buffered area are submitted planting within the buffer shall be the responsibility of Quantum Associates, but at sometimes may be contractually delegated to the adjacent property developer Plantings of the buffer shall be completed prior to the Certificate of occupancy being issued on the buffered property In addition to Boynton Beach Landscape Requirements, as amended from time to time, the number of plants/trees to be provided shall be based upon perimeter frontage For each tt ~v-five feet thet a parcel either fronts on or cont. ~ _ _ __~__ ......lIfer, four additional shrubs, three foot, six inches in height at the time of planting, shall be required and one additional tree, with a minimum two and one half inch caliber, twelve foot, zero inches minimum height and eight foot, zero inch diameter minimum canopy, at the time of planting, shall be l-equired Such additional landscape materials shall be placed between the rear of the development and the first twenty feet of greenbelt buffer area, measured from the boundary of the development parcel Placement shall be determined based upon input from the Quantum Park Design Review Committee and Quantum Park Buffer Page 2 the city of Boynton Beach (as part of the site plan review), and the requirements and restrictions of the South Florida Water Management District, Lake worth Drainage District, and Florida Power and Light Any permits required for landscaping within the South Florida Water Management District easement areas shall be acquired by Quantum Associates A minimum of a twenty feet width of greenbelt buffer shall receive sod, and the balance of the land area shall be shaped and seeded to prOVide a completely finished appearance Maintenance of greenbelt buffer areas shall be the responsibility of the underlying property owner Landscaping within the greenbelt buffer shall be irrigated by a broadcast irrigation system placed along the property line of the adjacent development parcel, and the installation and maintenance shall be the responsibility of such parcel's owner 4 Parcels owned by Quantum Associates, QRA, Inc , or the Quantum community Development District, may have green space easements placed upon them that are dedicated to the adjacent development parcel In such instances, it is understood by Quantum Associates and the City of Boynton Beach that building setbacks shall be measured from outside easement boundary lines rather than the property lines of the development parcel In those instances where parcels have a green space easement adjacent to a canal, the building setbacks shall be measured from the top of the canal bank We would recommend that the City Commission approve the site plan for lot 49 subject to the above conditions with a further stipulation that Quantum Park submit a master plan modification for the P I D to include these conditions in the site plans for future development on the canals on the perimeter of the P I D CC/jm BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 91-358 september 27, 1991 FROM Christopher cutro, planning Director Don Jaeger, Building Official~ Michael E Haag, Zoning & site Development Administrator TO THRU RE TRB Comments - September 24, 1991 Meeting SITE PLAN - LOT 49 QUANTUM PARK Upon review of the above mentioned project, the following list of comments must be addressed in order to conform with Boynton Beach City Codes 1 All drawings and/or documents submitted for public record and prepared by a design professional shall show original legible raised seal and signature of a Florida registered design professional responsible for the drawings/documents 2 Identify on the site plan the proposed elevation of the finish floor of the building 3 Provide a copy of a Boynton Beach Unity of Title recorded by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Palm Beach county combining lots 49 and 49A into one site 4 Indicate on the plan the proposed use of the building 5 Show and label on the site plan the location of the forty (40) foot wide peripheral greenbelt that is required along the south property line of the lot that borders the perimeter o~ the Quantum Park project 6 Identify and specify on the site plan the location of the required open space (landscaped area) The minimum area shall be twenty (20) percent of the lot being developed Identify and specify the location of the required twenty (20) percent of open space with the inclusion of the future warehouse expansion 7 Show and specify on the site plan the minimum required thirty (30) foot setback distance from the south property line of the lot being developed to the proposed shop building 8 Show and specify on the site plan the setback distance from the west property line to the eight (8) foot concrete retaining wall 9 Include within the elevation view drawing of the free standing sign the followinn ~r infnrm~~tnn i ii show and identify the source of illumination specify the type of finish material and color of the siqn structure specify the type of finish material proposed for the sign frame, face and copy specify the color of the sign frame, face and copy Sign structure must match the approved sign program for the Quantum Park project iii iv NOTE 10 specify on the plan the length, height, type of material and color of the sign copy for all signage proposed for the building To Christopher cutro Re Lot 49 Quantum Pk, Memo #91-358 Page Two of Six 11 Provide a typical detail section drawing of the site buffer wall that is required along the lot that is contiguous with the residential property to the south i specify the size and type of all required vertical and horizontal structural material and components for the wall and wall foundation ii identify location, type and color of finish material proposed for the buffer wall iii include on the section drawing the location of the property line (min 2' from any property line to the wall) iv show and identify, on the site plan drawing, the location of the buffer wall a minimum of two feet (2') in from all property lines 12 show on the plans the computations and figures used to determine the total number of required parking spaces for the entire site 13 Specify within the typical detail drawing of the pavement markings the appropriate color white for asphalt and black for concrete surfaces 14 Include within the drawings a detailed elevation view drawing of the proposed site lighting pole and fixture Show and specify the following pole and fixture data i specify that the fixture is photocell activated ii state that the pole, pole base and fixture is designed consistent with the windload requirements specified within Chapter 12 of the Standard Building Code, 1988 Edition iii specify the type of luminary (metal halide or high or low pressure sodium) iv show the light contours and specify their foot candle light level v specify, where applicable, shields to deter off-site glare vi state that the height of the pole and fixture matches the height of same specified on the photometric drawing vii specif~ the depth of the pole and/or pole base is placed below grade viii provide a detail drawing of the pole base showing and specifying the vertical and horizontal structural materials and components Including the size and type of fasteners required to attach the pole to the base ix show the distance from the grade to the top of the pole base x correct conflicts between the location of site lighting pole(s) and drainage structures, landscaping and parking spaces I recommend that the rear truck area be lighted with site lighting poles that have fixtures that shield glare to the residential area to the sourr- 1,,,.... +-'1,;:>,-, "'i v+-llre~ JTInunted on the building that WOUld SU.!.ue LUwaras Lne residential area An alternate method would be to provide shields for the wall mounted fixtures while still providing the appropriate light levels 15 specify on the elevation view drawing the color of the following exterior finish material(s) i pedestrian swing doors ii overhead doors iii all exterior finish color(s) for the shop area To Christopher cutro Re Lot 49, Quantum Pk, Memo # 91-358 Page Three of Six 16 The outline configuration and material shown and identified on the project drawing(s) submitted with the plants) for final sign-off shall match in every respect the colored drawing(s) approved by the City Commission during the approval process of the project The color of each exterior finish material shown on the final sign-off plans shall be identified by name, color number and manufacturers name which shall match in every respect with the color(s) shown on the drawing(s) approved by the City Commission A manufacturer's color chart showing and identifying all approved color(s) shall be submitted with the plans for final sign-off 17 Show on the site plan drawing the handicapped accessible route leading to the entrance of the building from the handicapped parking spaces Drawing shall include the following information i show and dimension the width of the five (5) foot wide access aisle that is required to be parallel with the length of each handicapped parking space (one aisle may be placed between and serve two (2) handicapped parking spaces) ii specify and show the following five (5) foot wide aisle informat on a) slope b) slope of flared sides c) type of material d) texture of finish e) length iii show the required handicapped accessible walkway that leads to the entrance of the building from the five (5) foot access aisle Specify and show the following walkway information a) slope for the entire length b) texture of the finish c) total length d) cross slope e) width f) type of material g) location, height, material and configuration of handrail, where required iv show the location, width, length and elevation of the level platform that is required at the entrance to the building 18 Revise the typical detail drawing of the handicapped parking space to ~omply with the State of Florida Accessibility RequirementE Manual Pl~ns must include the following information i dimension the width and length ii show and identify the size, location and configuration of the handicapped pavement markings iii specify the color blue for the pavement markings iv show the location and i dc~ 1=" ....n... n""'; nht- ("'If t"hp handicapped parking SlyUa':jc \1 l.uut. tl.UIII grade 1:0 the bottom of the sign is required) 19 proposed shop area requires an environmental review by the Environmental Review Board (ERB) obtain ERB applications from the Planning Department Complete and return the application to the Planning Department 20 Include within the note found on the site plan that identifies the total number of employees for the proposed business the number of employees that will be working in the shop building To Christopher cutro Re Lot 49, Quantum Pk, Memo # 91-358 Page Four of six 21 Show on the rear elevation view drawing the location, style and height of the parapet wall and the finish roof line 22 Submit a roof plan for the proposed building Include the roof mounted mechanical equipment and other roof mounted appurtenancQs such as skylights I recommend when showing the aforementioned items to identify the location of screening to block the view of same from the residential area to the south 23 show and specify on the landscape plan the finish ground surface material proposed for the area where the future warehouse is shown 24 Show and specify on the landscape plan the type of grass or landscaping proposed for the canal bank Specify and show on the irrigation plan that the canal bank will be irrigated 25 Show the unobstructed cross visibility area and space through the required site perimeter landscape strips at both sides of all ingress and egress driveways The cross visibility area and space is shown by placing and dimensioning on the site plan a ten foot (10') isosceles triangle The point where both ten foot (10') legs join shall be placed on the property line at the edge of the ingress/egress with one leg extending along the property line and the other leg along the edge of the ingress/egress with the remainder of the triangle being a line across the landscaped area connecting the end of each ten foot (10') leg state rn the plans that the vertical space between thirty inches (30") and six feet (6') within the triangle area is clear of landscape material and tree limbs 26 A landscape area with a continuous visual barrier is required to screen on-site vehicle use areas from Park Ridge Boulevard, the public right-of-way abutting the north property line show the location and specify the following required visual barrier and landscape information on the plans i dimension the spacing of the required trees within the landscape area (maximum spacing forty feet [40'] on center) ii identify the specie of tree and size (minimum height at planting eight [8] feet) iii dimension the spacing of each hedge plant material required to form the continuous visual barrier along the entire right-of-way (maximum spacing twenty-four [24] inches on center) iv specify type and location of mulch material to be used and it's thickness when laid 27 A continuous visual barrier is required to screen the on-site vehicle use area from the property that is abutting your property to the south p~c ~ ~~~ ~~~~ tD~ location and specify the folloWlug requlred visual barrier information on the plans i dimension the spacing of each hedge plant material required to form the continuous visual barrier along the entire property line (maximum spacing is twenty-four [24] inches on center) ii state the specie of each hedge plant material iii state the size specifications for all hedge plant material (minimum height at planting is eighteen [18] inches) iv specify type and location of mulch material to be used and it's thickness when laid To Christopher Cutro Re Lot 49, Quantum Pk, Memo # 91-358 Page Five of Six 28 show on the landscape plan the computations used to provide the required 50% native specie count for the required number of trees, hedge, ground cover and vine landscape material specified on the landscape plan Identify the native specie plant material by providing a distinguishable symbol by each native plant specified on the plan 29 Regarding the peripheral greenbelt and buffer wall requirements, I offer the following based on the discussion at the September 24, 1991 Technical Review Board Meeting LOT DESCRIPTION Lot 49 and 49A abut each other with separate owners, Lot 49A abuts the C-16 Canal and is contiguous with a residential zoned district to the south Lot 49A is also a perimeter lot of the Quantum Park project CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PERIPHERAL GREENBELT AND BUFFER WALL i PERIPHERAL GREENBELT Section 7 H 17 of Appendix A-Zoning The project area shall be enclosed on all sides with the exception of accessways for traffic and freight by a landscaped area with a minimum width of twenty-five (25) feet except when such property abuts a residential district such greenbelt shall have a minimum width of forty (40) feet It shall be the responsibility of the owner or developer to carry out this requirement, and to provide such maintenance or guarantee of maintenance subject to Planning and Zoning Board and community Appearance Board approval ii BUFFFR WALL Section 4 L For new construction or major modifications to existing developments, where a commercial and/or industrial district abuts a residential district, a solid masonry wall finished on both sides at least six (6) feet in height shall be located within the required side and/or rear yards except with respect to corner lots, said buffer walls shall be required only on interior lot lines said buffer walls shall not abridge any easement rights or be constructed over any existing utilities in any easement area and shall be setback two (2) feet from adjoining property lines With respect to the C-1 (Office and Commercial Professional District), the solid masonry wall may be replaced with a dense vegetative buffer to be maintained by the project developer Construction of said decorative masonry wall or planting of said ve~~t~tive buffer shall be completed prior t_ _ _~~~ ~~ of occupancy for the building or buildings sought to be built in connection herewith Therefore, ~how the peripheral greenbelt and buffer wall on Lot 49A However, considering the constraints regarding installing landscaping other than grass and a buffer wall on Lot 49A as a result of vested use of the lot by South Florida Water Management District, I recommend, to satisfy the greenbelt and buffer wall requirements, that one-half (1/2) of the forty (40) foot wide greenbelt that includes To Christopher cutro Re Lot 49, Quantum Pk, Memo # 91-358 Page Six of Six the tree, hedge and ground cover landscaping that is subject to the determination of the Planning and Zoning Board and Community Appearance Board and the buffer wall (location subject to the conditions of the existing Florida Power and Light easement, be placed on Lot 49, and require Lot 49A to be graded and covered with grass that is irrigated If Lot 49 and 49A are under single ownership, the lots must be combined by Unity of Title and my aforementioned recommendation would remain the same regarding the location of the landscaping and buffer wall This condition would satisfy the requirements of the code The primary recommendation is consistent with the development of the Safety Kleen Corp site, a project bordering on the same canal just west of the proposed site The Safety Kleen site was created by centering the required forty (40) loot wide peripheral greenbelt over a lot line with the same condition as Lots 49 and 49A The required buffer wall was placed on the lot the building was constructed and north of the fifteen (15) foot wide Florida Power and Light easement The trees, hedge and ground cover landscape material was placed within the easement, meeting the landscape material requirements of Florida Power and Light The Lot bordering the canal was irrigated and landscaped with grass to establish the remaining twenty (20) foot of the greenbelt t!.4f( - M9y~_'U:3~'''~ POLICE DEPARTMENT CODE ENFORCEMENT UNIT MEMORANDUM NO 93-164 r TO J \' , Scott Miller, City Manager . ~~ M Dettman, Ch1ef of Police jY , THRU T FROM Scott Blasie, Code Enforcement Unlt Supervlsor DATE October 19, 1993 SUBJECT Publix NOlse Update I spoke with Jim Slappey, the area representative ln Lakeland, regardlng the results of his october 15th reassessment of the nOlse situation at publix He apologlzed fer not contactlng my offlce to arrange a ]Olnt lnvestigation as we had discussed He then proceeded to say that his investigation did not reveal what he felt were noises which would constitute a nuisance to the neighbors At my inslstance, he agreed to send a directive to Glen FranC1S (Publix Manager) instructlng him to take whatever steps necessary to allevlate the late nlght noise that does occur I will keep you advlsed as further information becomes available, also, coples of Mr Slappey's directive will be torthcomlng r ~l~~ SBjmr ocr 1 9 1993 CITYMAI'w,iG::..:t1'SOFACE ~ ~ WHERE SHOPP'NG ;5 A PLEA5LRE -- ""----_/ Publix suoer markets I !(.....':f Ii '- TO GLEN FRANCIS FROM JIM SLAPPEY DATE OCTOBER 18, 1993 RE NOISE IN W~REHOUSE Glen, Because of noise complaints in your area, we need to, as soon as possible, turn off the intelcom systems in our warehouse bl 10 30 pm to 11 00 om e1eri night Absolutely no horn blowlng after 10 00 pm This helps Publix continue to be good neighbors ,J ;;m If you have 1f<Y'f'''-/1 Slaopey !J any questions, please call JS/bjm c Scott Blasie - City of Boynton Scott Miller City Manager o C f 2 r:, 1c:q1 ell ..., MAIN OI"~leE AND WARFI v LAKELAND FLORIDA 33802-0407 PH\"; I PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM ;91-265 FROM J Scott Miller, city Manager <c Christopher Cutro, Planning Director TO DATE October 15, 1991 RE Quantum Park Buffer The original P I D for Quantum Park requires a peripheral greenbelt of 40 feet when development is adjacent to residential property In the past it has been interpreted that a 6 foot wall is required in this buffer In Quantum Park property, the developed parcels are not directly adjacent to residential Instead there are a series of intervening lots which will be owned by the C D D and contain canals, canal banks and some land This situation does not require a b foot wall Deutsch Ireland has proposed the following conditions for the buffer areas on canals Quantum Park P.I.D. GreenBelt Buffers. 1 Whether a greenbelt buffer is required, will be determined by land use not zoning An industrial use, office use, R&D use, or commercial/retail use within Quantum Park that abuts a residential use outside Quantum Park shall have a forty foot wide greenbelt buffer separating such uses from adjacent residential uses An industrial use, office use, R&D use, or commercial/retail use within Quantum Park that abuts any of the same uses outside Quantum Park shall have a twenty-five foot greenbelt buffer between the uses 2 All buffers shall be measured from Quantua Park Perimeter property lines inward and water shall be included as an acceptable part of such buffers Whenever necessary, the buffer dimensions shall be increased such that a minimum of twenty feet of earth is provided in a continuous fashion Such areas shall be planted in accordance with number 3 below 3 All planting plans for the greenbelt buffer shall be submitted to the city of Boynton Beach for approval when development plans for the adjoining buffered area are submitted Planting within the buffer shall be the responsibility of Quantum Associates, but at sometimes may be contractually delegated to the adjacent property developer Plantings of the buffer shall be completed prior to the Certificate of occupancy being issued on the buffered property In addition to Boynton Beach Landscape Requirements, as amended from time to time, the number of plants/trees to be provided shall be based upon perimeter frontage For each twenty-fiv r.~et that a parcel either fronts on or contains a p_._ _ ~ ______ _____., _~ur additional shrubs, three foot, six inches in height at the time of planting, shall be required and one additional tree, with a minimum two and one half inch caliber, twelve foot, zero inches minimum height and eight foot, zero inch diameter minimum canopy, at the time of planting, shall be lequlred such additional landscape materials shall be placed between the rear of the development and the first twenty feet of ~leenbelt buffer area, measured from the boundary of the d~ ~lo~ment parcel Placement shall be determined based l.pc.n input from the Quantum Park Design Review Commlttee and ~ Quantum Park Buffer ~ Page 2 the city of Boynton Beach (as part of the site plan review), and the requirements and restrictions of the South Florida Water Management District, Lake worth Drainage District, and Florida Power and Light Any permits required for landscaping within the South Florida Water Management District easement areas shall be acquired by Quantum Associates A minimum of a twenty feet width of greenbelt buffer shall receive sod, and the balance of the land area shall be shaped and seeded to provide a completely finished appearance Maintenance of greenbelt buffer areas shall be the responsibility of the underlying property owner Landscaping within the greenbelt buffer shall be irrigated by a broadcast irrigation system placed along the property line of the adjacent development parcel, and the installation and maintenance shall be the responsibility of such parcel's owner 4 Parcels owned by Quantum Associates, QRA, Inc , or the Quantum Community Development District, may have green space easements placed upon them that are dedicated to the adjacent development parcel In such instances, it is understood by Quantum Associates and the City of Boynton Beach that building setbacks shall be measured from outside easement boundary lines rather than the property lines of the development parcel In those instances where parcels have a green space easement adjacent to a canal, the building setbacks shall be measured from the top of the canal bank We would recommend that the City Commission approve the site plan for lot 49 subject to the above conditions with a further stipulation that Quantum Park submit a master plan modification for the P I D to include these conditions in the site plans for future development on the canals on the perimeter of the P I D CCjjm BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 91-358 September 27, 1991 TO Christopher cutro, Planning Director FROM Don Jaeger, BUilding Official~ Michael E Haag, zoning & Site Development Administrator THRU RE TRB Comments - September 24, 1991 Meeting SITE PLAN - LOT 49 QUANTUM PARK Upon review of the above mentioned project, the following list of comments must be addressed in order to conform with Boynton Beach city codes 1 All drawings and/or documents submitted for public record and prepared by a design professional shall show original legible raised seal and signature of a Florida registered design professional responsible for the drawings/documents 2 Identify on the site plan the proposed elevation of the finish floor of the building 3 Provide a copy of a Boynton Beach Unity of Title recorded by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Palm Beach county combining lots 49 and 49A into one site 4 Indicate on the plan the proposed use of the building 5 Show and label on the site plan the location of the forty (40) foot wide peripheral greenbelt that is required along the south property line of the lot that borders the perimeter o~ the Quantum Park project 6 Identify and specify on the site plan the location of the required open space (landscaped area) The minimum area shall be twenty (20) percent of the lot being developed Identify and specify the location of the required twenty (20) percent of open space with the inclusion of the future warehouse expansion 7 Show and specify on the site plan the minimum required thirty (30) foot setback distance from the south property line of the lot being developed to the proposed shop building 8 show and specify on the site plan the setback distance from the west property line to the eight (8) foot concrete retaining wall 9 Include within the elevation view drawing of the free standing sign the following sion i ~m~~ ~~ i ii show and identify the source of illumination specify the type of finish material and color of the siqn structure specify the type of finish material proposed for the sign frame, face and copy spe:ify the color of the sign frame, fa~e and copy Sign structure must match the approved slgn proglam for the Quantum Park project iii 1'1 NOTE 10 Specify on the plan the length, height, type of material and color of the sign copy for all signage proposed for the building ~ '"WI To Christopher cutro Re Lot 49 Quantum Pk, Memo ~91-358 Page TWo of Six 11 Provide a typical detail section drawing of the site buffer wall that is required along the lot that is contiguous with the residential property to the south i specify the size and type of all required vertical and horizontal structural material and components for the wall and wall foundation ii identify location, type and color of finish material proposed for the buffer wall iii include on the section drawing the location of the property line (min 2' from any property line to the wall) iv show and identify, on the site plan drawing, the location of the buffer wall a minimum of two feet (2') in from all property lines 12 show on the plans the computations and figures used to determine the total number of required parking spaces for the entire site 13 Specify within the typical detail drawing of the pavement markings the appropriate color white for asphalt and black for concrete surfaces 14 Include within the drawings a detailed elevation view drawing of the proposed site lighting pole and fixture Show and specify the following pole and fixture data i specify that the fixture is photocell activated ii state that the pole, pole base and fixture is designed consistent with the windload requirements specified within Chapter 12 of the Standard Buildinq Code, 1988 Edition iii specify the type of luminary (metal halide or high or low pressure sodium) iv show the light contours and specify their foot candle light level v specify, where applicable, shields to deter off-site glare vi state that the height of the pole and fixture matches the height of same specified on the photometric drawing vii specif~ the depth of the pole and/or pole base is placed below grade viii provide a detail drawing of the pole base showing and specifying the vertical and horizontal structural materials and components Including the size and type of fasteners required to attach the pole to the base ix show the dlstance from the grade to the top of the pole base x correct conflicts between the location of site lighting pole(s) and drainage structures, landscaping and parking spaces I recommend that the rear truck area be lighted with site lighting poles that have fixtures that shield glare to the residential area to the south rath~r .., fi h ~"'~ ",~"..,t-o" on the building that would shine tOWa~U~ Lne resldentlal area An alternate method would be to provide shlelds for the wall mounted fixtures while still providing the appropriate light levels 15 Specify on the elevation view drawing the color of the following exterior finish material(s) i pedestrian swing doors ii overhead doors iii all exterior finish color(s) for the shop area To Christopher cutro Re Lot 49, Quantum Pk, Memo # 91-358 Page Three of Six 16 The outline configuration and material shown and identified on the project drawing(s) submitted with the plan(s) for final sign-off shall match in every respect the colored drawing(s) approved by the City Commission during the approval process of the project The color of each exterior finish material shown on the final sign-off plans shall be identified by name, color number and manufacturers name which shall match in every respect with the color(s) shown on the drawing(s) approved by the City Commission A manufacturer's color chart showing and identifying all approved color(s) shall be submitted with the plans for final sign-off 17 show on the site plan drawing the handicapped accessible route leading to the entrance of the building from the handicapped parking spaces Drawing shall include the following information i show and dimension the width of the five (5) foot wide access aisle that is required to be parallel with the length of each handicapped parking space (one aisle may be placed between and serve two (2) handicapped parking spaces) ii specify and show the following five (5) foot wide aisle informat on a) slope b) slope of flared sides c) type of material d) texture of finish e) length iii show the required handicapped accessible walkway that leads to the entrance of the building from the five (5) foot access aisle Specify and show the following walkway information a) slope for the entire length b) texture of the finish c) total length d) cross slope e) width f) type of material g) location, height, material and configuration of handrail, where required iv show the location, width, length and elevation of the level platform that is required at the entrance to the building 18 Revise the typical detail drawing of the handicapped parking space to ~omply with the state of Florida Accessibility Requirement~ Manual P]~ns must include the following information i dimension the width and length ii show and identify the size, location and configuration of the handicapped pavement markings iii specify the color blue for the pavement markings 1v show the location and identify tt ~i 'n~ ~f ~~a handicapped parking signage (7 ruv~ LiUID grade to tne bottom of the sign is required) 19 Proposed shop area requires an environmental review by the Environmental Review Board (ERB) Obtain ERB applications from the Planning Department Complete and return the application to the Planning Department 20 Include within the note found on the site plan that identifies the total number of employees for the proposed business the number of employees that will be working in the shop building ~ ~ ~ To Christopher cutro Re Lot 49, Quantum Pk, Memo # 91-358 Page Four of Six 21 Show on the rear elevation view drawing the location, style and height of the parapet wall and the finish roof line 22 Submit a roof plan for the proposed bUilding Include the roof mounted mechanical equipment and other roof mounted appurtenanc~s such as skylights I recommend when showing the aforementioned items to identify the location of screening to block the view of same from the residential area to the south 23 show and specify on the landscape plan the finish ground surface material proposed for the area where the future warehouse is shown 24 Show and specify on the landscape plan the type of grass or landscaping proposed for the canal bank Specify and show on the irrigation plan that the canal bank will be irrigated 25 Show the unobstructed cross visibility area and space through the required site perimeter landscape strips at both sides of all ingress and egress driveways The cross visibility area and space is shown by placing and dimensioning on the site plan a ten foot (10') isosceles triangle The point where both ten foot (10') legs join shall be placed on the property line at the edge of the ingress/egress with one leg extending along the property line and the other leg along the edge of the ingress/egress with the remainder of the triangle being a line across the landscaped area connecting the end of each ten foot (10') leg State rn the plans that the vertical space between thirty inches (30") and six feet (6') within the triangle area is clear of landscape material and tree limbs 26 A landscape area with a continuous visual barrier is required to screen on-site vehicle use areas from Park Ridge Boulevard, the public right-of-way abutting the north property line show the location and specify the following required visual barrier and landscape information on the plans i dimension the spacing of the required trees within the landscape area (maximum spacing forty feet [40'] on center) ii identify the specie of tree and size (minimum height 3t planting eight [8] feet) iii dimension the spacing of each hedge plant material required to form the continuous visual barrier along the entire right-of-way (maximum spacing twenty-four [24] inches on center) iv specify type and location of mulch material to be used and it's thickness when laid 27 A continuous visual barrier is required to screen the on-site vehicle use area from the property that is abutting your property to the south, east, ~~~ location and specify the following required visual barrier information on the plans l i dimension the spacing of each hedge plant material required to form the continuous visual barrier along the entire property line (maximum spacing is twenty-four [24] inches on center) ii state the specie of each hedge plant material iii state the size specifications for all hedge plant material (minimum height at planting is eighteen [18] inches) iv specify t/pe and location of mulch material to be used and it's thickness when laid To Christopher cutro Re Lot 49, Quantum Pk, Memo # 91-358 Page Five of Six 28 show on the landscape plan the computations used to provide the required 50% native specie count for the required number of trees, hedge, ground cover and vine landscape material specified on the landscape plan Identify the native specie plant material by providing a distinguishable symbol by each native plant specified on the plan 29 Regarding the peripheral greenbelt and buffer wall requirements, I offer the following based on the discussion at the September 24, 1991 Technical Review Board Meeting LOT DESCRIPTION Lot 49 and 49A abut each other with separate owners, Lot 49A abuts the C-16 Canal and is contiguous with a residential zoned district to the south Lot 49A is also a perimeter lot of the Quantum Park project CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PERIPHERAL GREENBELT AND BUFFER WALL i PERIPHERAL GREENBELT Section 7 H 17 of Appendix A-Zoning The project area shall be enclosed on all sides with the exception of accessways for traffic and freight by a landscaped area with a minimum width of twenty-five (25) feet except when such property abuts a residential district such greenbelt shall have a minimum width of forty (40) feet It shall be the responsibility of the owner or developer to carry out this requirement, and to provide such maintenance or guarantee of maintenance subject to Planning and Zoning Board and Community Appearance Board approval . ii BUFFFR WALL Section 4 L For new construction or major modifications to existing developments, where a commercial and/or industrial district abuts a residential district, a solid masonry wall finished on both sides at least six (6) feet in height shall be located within the required side and/or rear yards except with respect to corner lots, said buffer walls shall be required only on interior lot lines Said buffer walls shall not abridge any easement rights or be constructed over any existing utilities in any easement area and shall be setback two (2) feet from adjoining property lines With respect to the C-l (Office and Commercial Professional District), the solid masonry wall may be replaced with a dense vegetative buffer to be maintained by the project developer construction of said decorative masonry wall or planting of said vegetative 1 ffpr shall be completed prior to issuance ~-------- occupancy for the bUilding or buildings sought to be built in connection herewith Therefore, Ehow the peripheral greenbelt and buffer wall on Lot 49A However, considering the constraints regarding installing landscaping other than grass and a buffer wall on Let 40A as a result of vested use of the lot by south Florida Water Management District, I recommend, to satisfy the greenbelt and buffer wall requirements, that one-half (1/2) of the forty (40) foot wide greenbelt that includes 4 ~ ~ To Christopher cutro Re Lot 49, Quantum Pk, Memo # 91-358 Page Six of Six the tree, hedge and ground cover landscaping that is subject to the determination of the Planning and zoning Board and Community Appearance Board and the buffer wall (location subject to the conditions of the existing Florida Power and Light easement, be placed on Lot 49, and require Lot 49A to be graded and covered with grass that is irrigated If Lot 49 and 49A are under single ownership, the lots must be combined by Unity of Title and my aforementioned recommendation would remain the same regarding the location of the landscaping and buffer wall This condition would satisfy the requirements of the code The primary recommendation is consistent with the development of the Safety Kleen corp site, a project bordering on the same canal just west of the proposed site The Safety Kleen site was created by centering the required forty (40) foot wide peripheral greenbelt over a lot line with the same condition as Lots 49 and 49A The required buffer wall was placed on the lot the building was constructed and north of the fifteen (15) foot wide Florida Power and Light easement The trees, hedge and ground cover landscape material was placed within the easement, meeting the landscape material requirements of Florida Power and Light The Lot bordering the canal was irrigated and landscaped with grass to establish the remaining twenty (20) foot of the greenbelt PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 93-205 TO J/.jsc~t) Miller ~"Pl~ ~ vnK:..\ Christopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director FROM DATE: August 11, 1993 RE Buffer at Quantum Park The Planned Industrial Development for Quantum Park requires a landscape buffer on the south side and the northwest corner of the site where the property abuts residential property. The original buffer as presented contains a wall and shrubs but does not quarantee a visual buffer. The buffer was expected to be installed on a bUilding-by-building basis When the Canada Dry building was built, Deutsch/Ireland requested to change the buffer for that structure and the City Commission agreed with that request The change increased the landscaping, and we hoped would create a green visual barrier for that site. Unfortunately, small plant material has been planted so it will take some time to fully evaluate the effect of the approved buffer Peter Henn, who has been representing Quantum Park, has indicated that Melvin Simon, the owner of Quantum Park, wishes to again modify the buffer I stressed to him the desire of the City to create a visual screen in the buffer areas by requiring the planting of oversized landscaping. While he seemed amicable to this, I have yet to hear from Quantum Park on this approval Until that time, we will require the buffer to be installed as each site plan is submitted, with an emphasis on oversized material being located in that buffer area If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. CC/cmc C.Quanbuff BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 90-273 ~;jm C~1<4J~1)-- liJ,~VyL4 r ,~r~ ~ t I' II , , ~ Ju::.e 22, 1990 TO J. Scott Miller City Manager FROM Don Jaeger Building & Zoning Director RE QUANTUM PMU{ On June 22, 1990, Tim Cannon, Charlie Frederick, Kevin Hallahan, Vince Finizio, Mike Haag and I met to discuss the issue of landscape requirements at Quantum Park. Section 7 5-35(e) of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances requires a four (4) foot high landscape barrier between the off-street parking area and abutting property in order to screen parked vehicles. When the site plan for lots 4 and 5 was approved, City staff attempted to work with the developer by allowing them to utilize lake and upland plantings to meet the intent of the code. Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director at that time, incorrectly advised the City commission that the Community Appearance Board had approved an Appeal of Administrative Decision to the above mentioned code section. The issue was discussed at the Community Appearance Board and it was agreed that "in lieu of the hedge, they have been given the option to take hardwood species, which are basically trees that will grow in a wet area, and to use more of those to provide a blocking in an informal type of arrangement,," The plans were approved with this understanding Upon site inspection, the existing littoral zone and upland plantings do not meet code requirements. At present, staff is recommending the existing berm between the lake and the parking lot be increased to four (4) feet in height above the paved surface Appendix A-Zoning, Section 7 H.17 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances requires a peripheral greenbelt surrounding a Planned Industrial Development This landscape buffer must be twenty-five (25) feet where the property abuts a commercial or industrial district and forty (40) feet wide when abutting a residential district Appendix A-Zoning, Section 4 L of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances requires a solid stucco masonry buffer wall six (6) feet in height when a commercial and/or industrial district abuts a residential district Consistent with City CO~~~'Tl]~ directives, this requirement will be instituted ~~~~!~er lot's site plan is approved JUN 26 1990 PlANNII\JG O'::PT - ,,.~ ~o#..._ ..... .... ~. I. ;. ...~l. .. .... ~~ -. ~.... ~-.. .--.," ",' ., ~. !-J Memo RE: June Page to J Scott Miller Quantum Park 22, 1990 Two It is staff's intent to continue to work with the developers of Quantum Corporate Park in order to assist them in assuring a quality development. If I can be of further assistance, please advise ~U1t ~~)J Don Ja er @ i2/ DJ.bh XC. Tim Cannon Charlie Frederick Kevin Hallahan Vince Finizio Mike Haag QUANTUM DOC .-..... .".:...., "'r 't.. .. ;... :...... ;.... ." ...:' ~ ~~.. .,. .",,\. .'- ,~. ~ ~_~1.),.. "':';:.' -.I, ,~.":Jt.,- , ,,_~JI't ~Jf~. <<::"""',,..'t;t;4/-ir;~' '~~"-{,.'#J..! ---~ ~Tim DEPARTMENT Building, CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 'l Cannon, Vince Finizio DATE 6/14/90 ! I I l ~ Planning, Engineering Depts APPROPRIATE ACTION [!I FOR YOUR INFORMATION 0 EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION D NOTE AND RETURN D FOR YOUR FILES D OTHER 0 ACTION DESIRED PRIOR TO SUBJECT Quantum Park, Issue of Landscaped Barrier for Lakeside Commons & Allstate Insurance Projects Attached hereto please find a copy of a letter dated June 12, 1990, from Quantum Corporate Park to Don Jaeger, Building Official, concerning the requirement of a hedge or a landscape barrier at the rear of the above referenced projects On another occassion the requirement that Quantum Corporate Park must construct a masonary wall at those locations where the park abutts residential properties Of course Quantum Park does not right- fully believe that they are required by the City's code to construct such a structure I want all three of you to meet together on this matter and provide to this office specifically what the requirements of Quantum Corporate Park are relative to landscape buffers and barriers, as well as concrete walls, and include in your response the sections and provisions of the City code outlining said requirements please feel free to meet with Jim Cherof, City Attorney, reference this assignment Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated Thank you ~ 0co~3!~; Manager JSM cd cc Jim Cherof, City Attorney Kevin Hallahan, City Forester Attachments / '- ,/ -, ---- I. j v i,- .... -- oJ c --. ---- .. -""'1:,- ~ t 'K~. Replv Tn Ft'rI L.lUderdak Offiee QUANTUM CORPORATE P.\RJ... ~- ----- /~ " " .J June 12, 1990 Certified Mail #P 532 139 333 -_/ Mr Don Jaeger, Buildmg Official City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 RE. Quantum Park; Issue of Landscaped Barrier for Lakeside Commons and Allstate Insurance Projects Dear Don. I am writing to request reconsIderatIOn of your pOSItIOn concermng the reqUIrement of a hedge or landscaped barrIer at the rear of the above referenced projects. As we dIscussed at our meeting of June 7, 1990, with yourself, Michael Haag, Kevin Hallahan and Alan Capino, the issue of the landscaped barrIer was addressed at the Techmcal ReVIew Board Meeting (TRB) on June 8, 1988 for the LakesIde Commons Project. At this meeting the City Forester, Kevm J Hallahan, made the comment (Number 3 m hIS memorandum to Carmen Annunziato) as follows "A hedge or acceptable replacement must be planted to screen the parking lot along the south property line (adjacent to the lake areas)" Kevm's comment was made WIth respect to SectIOn 7.5-34(e) "PerImeter Landscapmg Relatmg to Abuttmg Properties", Article II. Landscape Code At the meeting, we agreed to discuss thIS code reqUIrement WIth the Commumty Appearance Board. At the Commumty Appearance Board meeting on June 20, 1988, the project was dIscussed (copy of minutes attached hereto) In the meetmg Kevin stated the followmg (page 19) "Now, mstead of haVIng one layer of vegetatIOn, they have three layers. In heu of the hedge, they have been given the optIOn to take hardwood specIes, WhIch are baSIcally trees that will grow m a wet area, and to use more of those to provIde a blockmg m an mformal type of arrangement. A Deutsch! Ireland Properties- Jleb'in Simon Joint J/?IIture Th~ 110 Tower. 21 st Floor. 110 South~ast Sixth Str~d . F,)rt Lauderdale. Florida ."\.1.101 141 ~ Bn)ward (1()~1 70J-HHHI'-. FAX 11()", 70J-H4%. Palm Beach (407) -'14-1~~~. Dade (10"llJ4:;-HIIO. H()()-421 "11-1 The Buddin!.! . 112:; Northeast 12:; Street. North Miami FlOrida 1."\161 - (10:') HlJl-oHOo. FAX IJOS) HlJ:'-H241 ,,.- .. ~. .. ... Mr Don Jaeger, ContInued June 12, 1990 Page Two Mr Hallahan said the reason the Board had to deCIde tonight whether this was appropriate was because many of Quantum's clients corning in at future dates will be using the same approach. If they buy lake front property, they will want to see the lake. Mr Hallahan thought they needed to address whether thIS would adequately proVIde buffenng for the cars that will be there. He personally felt they more adequately met that Intent. ThIS IS an Informal type of arrangement, rather than a formal, straight-line hedge material Another consideration is that there is quite a dIstance between the lake shore on this sIde and the tenants on the other side." The discussion continued as proVIded in an excerpt from the minutes as follows. "It seemed to Mrs. Shuman that they had talked about this before and that there was no need for hedges. Mr Zimmerman agreed, saying It was a prevIOUS plan on a dIfferent site and the CAB approved it without hedges. Vice Chairwoman Sheridan commented that the members had to start remembering what they do. Mr Jaeger concurred With Mr Hallahan that this met the Intent of the City's current ordInances. Mrs. Wische moved to accept the plans, subject to staff comment and to approve the elevatIOns as they were. The motlon carned 7-0." On June 21, 1988, the City Commission considered the request for sIte plan approval of the project. For your records, I have attached a copy of the mmutes and quote the mmutes as follows. "ThIs item was removed from the Consent Agenda for dIscussIOn at the request of CommIssIoner Olenik. See dIScussIon after Consent Agenda. The PlannIng and ZOnIng Board unanImously recommended approval of this request subject to staff comments. AdditIOnally, the PlannIng and Zoning Board recommended that the CIty CommissIOn accept a building elevation that IS general In nature as It relates to the locatIOn of doors and Windows, as the locatIons of doors and wmdows will change based upon tenant. 't~ ..... .. Mr Don Jaeger, Contmued June 12, 1990 Page Three Mr AnnunzIato noted that the CAB voted to gIVe administratIve relief in the requirement for a hedge along the lake" It seems quite clear in my review of the official minutes of the meetmgs and listening to the taped recordings, that the CAB considered the eXIstmg lake area landscapmg and SIte dIstances to proVIde an adequate landscaped barfler AddItIOnally, as noted by Mr Annunziato in the CommIssIon meeting minutes, lithe CAB voted to give administrative relief in the reqUIrement for a hedge along the lake." It IS further my belief that the staff recognized that this issue was resolved to theIr satisfaction when the staff members, including yourself and Kevin Hallahan, signed the TRB approval sheet prior to submIssIOn of construction plans to the Buildmg Department (copy attached hereto). I realize at the time of our meetmg you may not have had the opportunity to review the records on this issue. I hope that thIS information will adequately reflect the history in whIch Quantum Associates receIved approval to construct the project WIth a landscaped barrier which we believe IS more appropriate for lake front properties. ThIS leads directly to the second subject of our dIscussion regarding the sIgn-off of the only remaining TRB commentfor the Allstate office project on sites 20 and 21 ThIS comment pertains to Kevin Hallahan's comment, Number 3 in hIS memorandum to Tim Canon dated February 6, 1990, as follows. "The applIcant should be aware that the rear of the property landscapmg (lIttoral and upland hardwood plantings) must adequately screen the parking lot from sites dIrectly across the lake. I will review the SIte WIth the applicant to make a determination that additional plantmgs are not required for visual screenmg. " It should be noted that at the tIme of the TRB meetmg, we were under the Impression that the Issue was satisfactorily resolved on the LakeSIde Commons project. Smce the sItuation on the Allstate project IS Identical to the previous project which was approved, Quantum ASSOCIates agreed to Kevin Hallahan's comment. I have attached for your records a copy of the lake planting plan which depicts identIcal CIrcumstances where a visual buffer exists consisting of a lake slope berm, hardwood swamp trees, hardwood swamp shrubs and ground cover, lIttoral plantmgs, and a body of water averagIng In excess of 250 feet to the opposite shorelIne ... ... .'f- ". ., ... ."t~: Mr Don Jaeger, Continued June 12, 1990 Page Four AddItionally, with similar plantings on the opposite lake bank, the landscaping will mesh together to form a visual barrier from the parking lot of Lakeside Commons. This will create the same effect as having a staggered tree line. Only the first row of staggered landscaping occurs on the nearest lake bank and the second row occurs on the OpposIte lake bank. Smce this is a pomt which I did not have an opportunity to present at our meeting, I hope this information, along WIth the attached documentation on the Lakeside Commons project, will provide sufficient evidence that a visual barrier is in place. If you have any questions or require any additional information in order to reevaluate your posItion, please let me know Thank you for your consideratIon. very~ your~/? ~d~ MIC~;;~( Development Manager MJT:aem (MJ aeger) CC. Mr Scott Miller Mr George W Zimmerman Mr Steven W Deutsch David S. Pressly, Esq -treQlure co~t regional planning councIl May 4, 1990 CC AWl.. )0 0--r- - \ , , i j .. RECEIVED t-iA'j 0 8 Ig~a Mr. Kevin Hallahan Parks Department City of Boynton Beach Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Subject: Quantum Park Development of Regional Impact, Scrub Preserve Dear Mr. Hallahan: Enclosed please find a copy of my April 25, 1989, letter to Carmen Annunziato regarding the identification of the final 12 acres of scrub required to meet the 40 acres required preserved under Development Order Condition 6. The letter outlines the conditions under which staff found the proposal acceptable. Also enclosed is the "Exhibi t to Ecological Report, 20 December, 1988" so that you may make a copy for your file. There are no notes on this exhibit indicating which areas staff considered livery poor representatives" of scrub; however, I would be happy to look at any or all of them at any time (schedule permitting). I did look at the three-quarter-acre strip just east of the Publix distribution center's eastern fence line on April 19, 1990, as you requested. At least half of that strip falls in the "very poor" category. I saw some mature sand pines as well as a few smaller planted ones, which looked dead. The understory has been removed and the ground cover is dominated by the exotic natal grass. When we spoke by phone April 30, I indicated that the three- quarter acre could still be counted toward the remaining 12 acres of preserve called for in the Development Order, but only because it was immediately adjacent to Preserve Number Two. In examining the Exhibit, however, I see that the piece is separated from the preserve by a railroad line and lot #72. Therefore, this is not a suitable preserve area. Only 12 additional acres of scrub need to be preserved to meet the Development Order Condition of 40 acres. Sixty-six acres of potential preserve are identified on the Exhibit, most of which are in decent condition. Therefore, there is no justification for accepting scrub not including intact . "V I An-n ~~, A 1'\1:'" :122. ..w. martin down. t>>IYd. lult. 205 . p.o. tMlK t529 palm city, tlortda ).1990 phon. (m,,-liIii1a1 221~ l/"rr)~?~ - . .'t~;. /0 or / // Hr. Kevin Hallahan Parks Department May 4, ~990 Page Two canopy, understory, and ground cover, unless it will serve as a buffer to one of the existing preserve areas. staff concurs that the only habitat preservation for the Quantum Development of Regional Impact site required by the Development Order is the 40 acres. This is consistent with Council's 25 percent policy. If you have any questions, please call. Yours truly, sall~ ~ Regional Planner SB:pm Attachments ./- "\. 'j' i\" .. .;:\ )0 I.'" :'\.' .",:}, r~ , t.' . ....... ,r.~,,......:;..< , ""')'\li~ ,~. 'l~:I.I., .,.'}~l..GJ ....!. . I- ~ "II~.....\ '4'1' ~ ~,l 't , . I ,( ',' :.t, ""(''I','tl:''.'' 'I' l' .1,. 1....1 -,.. ~--.,. . . · ........ ....;t!)J.t. , \ .......~ ..~\ .,....:.\,\1')' i\ \' ..' ~ ~ J ~ -'I,'fl.:. . , :;.., \. \ . "'1' lh. I ~J"\ I .1 .. 1I"'11~:e-"'.t\'" ~ '. .~ '.~ I~;{: ,~~:~~ ~..~~f\' t ....:;.", I .... . .~. .r', .,.. 'j .. ':t; I I\) ~ ~ ~ ,,'ii , 1'1\ I; )J () ..-i.- \ ~ w . ~ . ; . : . : :: J\"'AC1 Clq ,\ctrt,=l(!I!l!Uid 11th: ~ I 1 't't 1- ~ltt't ~~r-E ~ t~tit;.!ii'ttl.li!~ Hili:' r- \ _ ~..1. I. ,Ii : t ,. ill . ..-~~ .: . i - -4 i i\\'.(. :. :.--1~ . .i-i -- - a - I . ~. -.,. i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U! ! !::~ l~j~, .'i" W . =- t. ': .. · ~a .~.. ~i ~ ... ~ ~ I.)~ ~ -'. .. .. .. .. x .. r- .. .. o " " i " .. .. .. :I en ! - -' - " '1 I ~\~ ~- i~ '<:,"... ...... rb. '..... ~ " .... ..... ~ I / ! I .. I / f .. ! a ! I ! ~ I / =-. I / ( -- ---------~~------ TO: PERMIT APPLICANT FROM. BUILDING DEPARTl1ENT SUBJECT: SUBMITTAL OF PLANS PROJECT NAME Quantum Park, Sites 4 & 5 Fil e #081 Prior to sUbmitting plans and specifications to the Building Department, it will be necessary that the staff's comments made during the preliminary review and approved ~y the City Council of Boynton Beach be properly addressed and rectified. Each department must be visited and the provisios corrected to the satisfaction of the department. In order for the Building Department to accept permits, this sign-off sheet must be presented off, without any provisios. This is necessary confusion and speed-up the permitting process. applications for properly signed to eliminate , APPROVED TECHNICAL COMMITTEE FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Building Department Fire Department /;- ~ lii <;g /(/ #y/!f" 9 ,.;;, " 2ft Engineering Department Utility Department Police Department Public Works Department Planning Department -f-L /0 (If!' ( Recreation Department Community Redevelopment Agency Forester/Horticulturist ~# 10 -b -8'8 Note: Because the Building Department will accept plans providing all changes, it should be the last department to review them ( ( " ( l " '\ MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 21, 1988 This item was removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion at the request of Commissioner Olenik. See discussion after Consent Agenda. 5. project Name: Agent: Owners: Location: Legal Description: Description: Quantum Office Park Adolfo J Cotilla, Jr., ACAI Associates, Inc. Quantum Associates Quantum Boulevard at the L.W.D D. E-4 Canal southeast corner Lot 5 of the Plat of QUANTUM PARK, Plat No.2, together with a portion of Tract "H", a drainage easement, in said Plat, said portion being designated as 5-A and Lot 4 of said Plat of Quantum Park, Plat No. 2 together with a portion of said Tract "H", said portion being designated as 4-B, and together with that portion of the L.W.D.D. Canal E-4, a drainage easement as said drainage easment is shown on said Plat, said portion being designated as 4-A SITE PLAN - Request for site plan approval to construct a 47,598 square foot office complex on 6 96 acres The Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended approv- al of this request, subject to staff comments. Additionally, the P&Z Board recommended that the City Commission accept a building elevation that is general in nature, as it relates to the location of doors and windows, as the locations of doors and windows will change based upon tenant occupancy. ~ Mr. Annunziato noted that the CAB voted to give administra- tive relief in the requirement for a hedge along the lake. Mayor Cassandra felt that a meeting between the Mayor and Commissioners and the Boards was needed so that the Boards would be fully aware of their job and how it relates to other Boards and to the City as a whole. 6. project name: Agent: Owners: Loction: Manor Care Personal Care Facility Bernard Kelly/Ivan Roekez Manor Health Care Corporation South Congress Avenue at Charter Drive, northwest corner -8- -~._-~---._- ----------~ "I. rl u... I" ph 1" r.>r' L..uJ"rJ...... Oil.... QUANTUM CORPORATE PARI\. May 1, 1990 Mr Michael Haag Zoning and Site Development Administrator City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach. Florida 33425 Re Quantum Park. Sites 20 and 21. Allstate Building Dear Michael I am writing to you in response to my discussion with Kevin Hallahan in which he has advised me that he cannot approve the project until Item 3 of his TRB comment is resolved This comment pertained to the requirement to screen the parking lot from sites directly across the lake Kevin further indicated in his comments that he would review the site with the applicant to make a determination that additional plantings are not required for visual screening Evidently, Kevin has now determined he is not satisfied Therefore, 1 am requesting your interventi9n in an effort to finally resolve this issue so that we may proceed wHh the project As you may recall. the subject was di scussed at the TRB Meeting and represents identical circumstances to the lakeside Commons project which received CAB and City Commission approval s to construct the project without planting additional landscaping to screen the parking lot Additionally. it was requested that the same criteria be established for all sites which adjoin the lake areas under identical circumstances The focus of our request to delete the additional hedge to screen the rear of the property was centered on the following facts 2) The property lines of these sites are located in the center of the lake providing a minimum of 200 feet between parking lots. but averaging approximately 600 feet between the rear of the parking lots Extensive landscaping has been planted within the lake areas pursuant to Development Order conditions to establish native Hardwood Swamp Vegetation Upon reaching maturity. this landscaping will provide an unstructured visual barrier between the properties located in closest proximity to each other (200 feet) 1) ... Del/l.H'lIllrelund Properfielt- .\/.'/I'i" Simun Jui", Ve'lfuI'e Th.: 110 'fi)\\.:r . ~I...I !"I,klr. 110 SllUlh.:a.o;l Sixlh '\lr.:.:1 . F.lrl laud.:rda!.: Florida JJJOI.."\-US B.."ward t)(lSI 7bJ-~ . FAX 1."111:', 7h."l-X9%. PillOI B.:...:h 140717).\..'\SS5. 00141.: I It I'" 1 'J-IS.KIIll. KlXl-f!I.:"II-I Th~ nui'.Iin~. 1125 Nunh.:asl 125 Slr.:.:1 · NlInh Miami. F1urida :nll,1 - t:\l.JSI 1('l1-IINN. . FAX l)(lSI 1(<):'-1(2-11 .....r'" "...... -- Mr Michael Haag, Continued May 1. 1990 Page Two 3) The installation of a structured hedge would detract from the aesthetic values of the lake areas and further reduce market incentive to site a project on premium lake fronts 4) It is evident that this issue is the result of Article II, Section 7 5(e} of the Boynton Beach Landscape Code, .Perimeter Landscaping Relating to Abutting Properties" The intent of this section was to provide a criteria for properties with comon property 1 ines with more traditional setback requirements between parking lots It is clear that the code did not anticipate commercial development on lakes in which average setback between rear parking lots would exceed 600 feet Due to the circumstances provided within Quantum Corporate Park, I request your approval of the TRB comment regarding this issue for Sites 20 and 21 If you do not believe this is within your jurisdiction to authorize, I respectfully request that this item be put on the agenda for consideration by the Community Appearance Board at the earl iest opportunity If you require any additional information, please contact me at your earliest convenience , Thank you for your consideration Very trUl~y Yo~rS'I./J /-"--' ~ // g/,/ ~~( MICHAE J T- L Development Manager MJT aem CC Mr Scott Miller Mr Kevin Hallahan Mr George W Zimmerman Mr Steven W Deutsch Mr Bob Dalia \ c~~ ~~7 1. I \('( 7 \ ' \;' - ~. ;;.~ ~ON & PARK MEMORANDUM #90-069 TO: Tim Cannon, Interim Planning Director Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Horticulturist FROM: SUBJECT DATE Quantum Office Park - Site Plan February 6, 1990 The fOllowing comments pertain to landscaping at the above site: The size of the saw palmetto species should be noted on the landscape legend. 2. 30% ot. the landscape plants (not trees) must be native ~~CL -.. - -. 3. The applicant should be aware that the rear of the property al upland hardwood plantings) m~st lot from sites directly across e -'Wrel the applicant to make ~l plantings are not required for visual screening. 4. If there are any locations along the lake edge abutting the two sites where soil erosion has occurred, the areas must be sodded. This will be determined with a site review by the applicant and myself. 5. The phase II site must be seeded and receive irrigation to prevent blowing sand, until the site is developed. 6. T L" Jt~l~ ""hedge" material should be noted on the landscape legend. 7. Potable water cannot be used for landscaped areas. ..- . ~ L""",: 9- ~/~tb.LW -. -Kevin J Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist KJH ad CITY MANAGER' S OFFICE CITY OP BOYNTON BEACH h,~ ~~ 4~ TO DEPARTMENT Buil Cannon, Vince Finizio DATE 6/14/90 Planning, Engineering Depts. SUBJECT Quantum Park; Issue of Landscaped Barrier for Lakeside Commons & Allstate Insurance Projects Attached hereto please find a copy of a letter dated June 12, 1990,-from Quantum Corporate Park to Don Jaeger, Building Official, concerning the requirement of a hedge or a landscape barrier at the rear of the above referenced projects On another occassion the requirement that Quantum Corporate Park must construct a masonary wall at those locations where the park abutts residential properties. Of course Quantum Park does not right- fully believe that they are required by the City's code to construct such a structure. I want all three of you to meet together on this matter and provide to this office specifically what the requirements of Quantum Corporate Park are relative to landscape buffers and barriers, ~s well as concrete walls, and include in your response the sections and provisions of the City code outlining said requirements. Please feel free to meet with Jim Cherof, City Attorney, reference this assignment Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated. Thank you. :(?c~~ Manager JSM cd cc Jim Cherof, City Attorney Kevin Hallahan, City Forester Attachments RECEIVED JUN 15 1990 PLANNING DEPT. ,"'" ,,"!' ",,$~~~~ ....; ,.,. ., RESPONSE: Date (Action Completed) " ~ Signature {boo ,,. .... ..t-;- t ~Il; ;iff~~' R"ply To Fori LlUoc:nJalc: orri"" QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK June 12, 1990 Certified Mail #P 532 139 333 Mr Don Jaeger, Building Official City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 RE. Quantum Park; Issue of Landscaped Barrier for Lakeside Commons and Allstate Insurance Projects Dear Don. I am writmg to request reconsideration of your position concerning the requirement of a hedge or landscaped barrier at the rear of the above referenced projects. As we dIscussed at our meeting of June 7, 1990, with yourself, Michael Haag, Kevin Hallahan and Alan Capino, the issue of the landscaped barrier was addressed at the Technical ReVIew Board Meeting (TRB) on June 8,1988 for the LakesIde Commons Project. At this meeting the City Forester, Kevin J Hallahan, made the comment (Number 3 in his memorandum to Carmen Annunziato) as follows. "A hedge or acceptable replacement must be planted to screen the parking lot along the south property line (adjacent to the lake areas)" Kevin's comment was made with respect to Section 7.5-34( e) "Perimeter Landscaping Relating to Abutting Properties", Article II. Landscape Code. At the meeting, we agreed to discuss thIS code requirement WIth the Commumty Appearance Board. At the Commumty Appearance Board meeting on June 20, 1988, the project was discussed (copy of minutes attached hereto). In the meetmg KeVIn stated the followmg (page 19) "Now, instead of having one layer of vegetatIOn, they have three layers. In lieu of the hedge, they have been given the option to take hardwood specIes, WhIch are basically trees that will grow in a wet area, and to use more of those to provide a blocking in an informal type of arrangement. A Deutsch/Ireland Properties- :vlell'in Simon Joint Venture RECEIVED The 110 Tower · 21 st Floor. 110 Southeast Sixth Street. Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33301 3415 Broward (305) 763-8888 . FAX (305) 763-8996. Palm Beach (407) 734-3555 . Dade (J051 945-8110. 800-421-5114 JUN 13 1990 The Building. 1125 Northeast 125 Street. North Miami. Florida 33161 (3051 8lJl-6XQ6 . FAX (30511N5-8241 cr~-Y ,-. ,r,\1 r t .....,. " -r-:-r r __ \ J , ~ . i.....,'-. ~ ~ Mr Don Jaeger, Continued June 12, 1990 Page Two Mr Hallahan said the reason the Board had to decide tonight whether this was appropriate was because many of Quantum's clients coming in at future dates will be using the same approach. If they buy lake front property, they will want to see the lake. Mr Hallahan thought they needed to address whether thIS would adequately provide buffenng for the cars that will be there. He personally felt they more adequately met that intent. This is an informal type of arrangement, rather than a formal, straIght-line hedge material Another consideration is that there is quite a distance between the lake shore on this side and the tenants on the other side." The discussion continued as provided in an excerpt from the minutes as follows. "It seemed to Mrs. Shuman that they had talked about this before and that there was no need for hedges. Mr Zimmerman agreed, saying it was a previous plan on a different site and the CAB approved it without hedges. Vice Chairwoman Sheridan commented that the members had to start remembering what they do. Mr Jaeger concurred with Mr Hallahan that this met the intent of the City's current ordinances. Mrs. Wische moved to accept the plans, subject to staff comment and to approve the elevations as they were. The motion carried 7-0." On June 21, 1988, the City Commission considered the request for site plan approval of the project. For your records, I have attached a copy of the minutes and quote the minutes as follows. 'This item was removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion at the request of Commissioner Olenik. See discussion after Consent Agenda. The Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended approval of this request subject to staff comments. Additionally, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended that the City CommIssion accept a building elevation that is general in nature as It relates to the location of doors and windows, as the locations of doors and windows will change based upon tenant. ~~........tft Mr Don Jaeger, Continued June 12, 1990 Page Three Mr Annunziato noted that the CAB voted to give administrative relief in the requirement for a hedge along the lake." It seems quite clear in my review of the official minutes of the meetings and listening to the taped recordings, that the CAB considered the existing lake area landscaping and site distances to provide an adequate landscaped barrier Additionally, as noted by Mr Annunziato m the Commission meeting minutes, "the CAB voted to give administrative relief in the requirement for a hedge along the lake." It is further my belief that the staff recognized that this issue was resolved to theIr satisfaction when the staff members, including yourself and Kevin Hallahan, signed the TRB approval sheet prior to submiSSIOn of construction plans to the Building Department (copy attached hereto). I realize at the time of our meeting you may not have had the opportunity to review the records on this issue. I hope that this information will adequately reflect the lustory in which Quantum Associates received approval to construct the project with a landscaped barrier which we believe is more appropriate for lake front properties. This leads directly to the second subject of our discussion regarding the sign-off of the only remaining TRB commentfor the Allstate office project on sites 20 and 21. This comment pertains to Kevin Hallahan's comment, Number 3 in his memorandum to Tim Canon dated February 6, 1990, as follows. "The applicant should be aware that the rear of the property landscaping (littoral and upland hardwood plantings) must adequately screen the parking lot from sites directly across the lake. I will review the site with the applicant to make a determmation that addItional plantings are not required for visual screening." It should be noted that at the time of the TRB meeting, we were under the impression that the issue was satisfactorily resolved on the Lakeside Commons project. Since the SItuation on the Allstate project is identical to the previous project which was approved, Quantum AssocIates agreed to Kevin Hallahan's comment. I have attached for your records a copy of the lake plantmg plan WhICh depIcts Identical circumstances where a visual buffer exists consisting of a lake slope berm, hardwood swamp trees, hardwood swamp shrubs and ground cover, littoral plantings, and a body of water averaging in excess of 250 feet to the OppOSIte shoreline. / ,./ 'Wi' ., Mr Don Jaeger, Continued June 12, 1990 Page Four Additionally, with similar plantings on the opposite lake bank, the landscaping will mesh together to form a visual barrier from the parking lot of Lakeside Commons. ThIs will create the same effect as haVIng a staggered tree line. Only the first row of staggered landscaping occurs on the nearest lake bank and the second row occurs on the OpposIte lake bank. Since this is a point which I did not have an opportunity to present at our meeting, I hope this mformation, along with the attached documentation on the Lakeside Commons project, will provide sufficient evidence that a visual barrier is in place. If you have any questions or require any additional information in order to reevaluate your position, please let me know Thank you for your consideration. MJT:aem (MJaeger) CC. Mr Scott Miller Mr George W Zimmerman Mr Steven W Deutsch DaVId S. Pressly, Esq. '\ " treQlure co~t regional planning councIl cc. 6wZ. c,.JO ~-r- - May 4, 1990 -t. RECEIVED \ . , i i ~i l\'\I~' 0::, , r; 0 ,g~o Mr. Kevin Hallahan Parks Department City of Boynton Beach Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Subject: Quantum Park Development of Regional Impact, Scrub Preserve Dear Mr. Hallahan: Enclosed please find a copy of my April 25, 1989, letter to Carmen Annunziato regarding the identification of the final 12 acres of scrub required to meet the 40 acres required preserved under Development Order Condition 6. The letter outlines the conditions under which staff found the proposal acceptable. Also enclosed is the "Exhibit to Ecological Report, 20 December, 1988" so tha.t you may make a copy for your file. There are no notes on this exhibit indicating which areas staff considered livery poor representatives" of scrub; however, I would be happy to look at any or all of them at any time (schedule permitting) . I did look at the three-quarter-acre strip just east of the Publix distribution center's eastern fence line on April 19, 1990, as you requested. At least half of that strip falls in the "very poor" category. I saw some mature sand pines as well as a few smaller planted ones, which looked dead. The understory has been removed and the ground cover is dominated by the exotic natal grass. When we spoke by phone April 30, I indicated that the three- quarter acre could still be counted toward the remaining 12 acres of preserve called for in the Development Order, but only because it was immediately adjacent to Preserve Number Two. In examining the Exhibi t, however, I see that the piece is separated from the preserve by a railroad line and lot #72. Therefore, this is not a suitable preserve area. Only 12 additional acres of scrub need to be preserved to meet the Development Order Condition of 40 acres. Sixty-six acres of potential preserve are identified on the Exhibit, most of which are in decent condition. Therefore, there is no justification for accepting scrub not including intact _I\V IAn'T\ "'" ..~, 322' a.w. martin downl ~d. lult. 205 . p.o. box iUt palm city, fIorlda Sott90 phon.l.m,-liIi'i1't1221~ It''r/'t~?~ - / .. / ~ I .../ _f -., Mr. Kevin Hallahan Parks Department May 4, 1990 Page Two canopy, understory, and ground cover, unless it will serve as a buffer to one of the existing preserve areas. staff concurs that the only habitat preservation for the Quantum Development of Regional Impact site required by the Development Order is the 40 acres. This is consistent with council's 25 percent policy. If you have any questions, please call. Yours truly, sau~ ~ Regional Planner SB:pm Attachments OJ'" '+-~ - ~.~~ \ .:.~~~' ~t;~/r '-1" /' /' ~ / I y(~ ./, .~~/'!- / / 1 ~- 16 L -~ . --. ~:.. ~ ~. - .r t'~'~*- ~- .~ ..~"'.- ~ - .;. ~ . r ,-lAKE 10 ;:. ~: ~:!:i' ~.::~. - ::~~~!~] ~;~~~ .;;'-:.:t,~ ;t~~~~- ...~ ".~ .;~~~ .......j.......~ . ~.:J:..~:.....:-- ."j ';.-:...~~ - ~,~.~~~--- h;. '....~~~~ ~ -" ~ . r -' ... " .- :-,. "~ \. 10. 0 E _ -- .---------- ------- -------- . ,)0 -.... ,. :,. ~ :~~; 1&' :~ .-~--- ..., .- ~=- ~#- ~ /-- ~, ..+~ .,.. ..,.. ~'.1 ._ '... ~~ .r--=-4.7'-.~ ..., .,.. ~ t ~" -! ~--.I~~,,- _- --.. ~;:L~~ .... ..;, o,,-{"t- '-~' =~-:.:...1 -=-~ ;.: . l~t~!~t~1:;'i~t~"~' - ~*~~~:::'Fi~''';,>~-?"r' ,: ""'" -'7- -,- , ..l.. LAKE 10 -..- t" ... -o- J_ . .. .. .. ; ~DSHAW,. GlLU"FUS DSCAPE ~ROuTeCTlJ' !R.OA.U....i-~FLOI =-. __". . It. . ). '<,.<'.:,. > / ". .: -/., >"'''. 'IV l' :."'-~ . ~--~ . -I : ~-. i--. ~ L:.... ..,.. ,- ". '::." .~- '''''''-~':: .1 -:~ ;~;~ -' . .. - -:'.. ....:.....r -, ....;~..'" -~ .... -- .;~- &JlI',"r : tllb PAt"r/~' PlMs $"~"$' 7.~lVp.11 ~~ IJJ!re- Pltf1Ifd"1~ , ~/ee..r- #ff~ AN:! U/~J - Also skw,'!'J" /)'S'JIIA'ei".S b~ $'liOedJ"es .. , -. -- !'" 6, ~:- :. I \ '. '" ~.;~... "'-~': -:;- '~r~A '~~~ . -' ~ .., .-i I ...,- , , . -.;c,,;~_,__,_ olh"-..;>~'"""""'-"";l(',,,, "'Lt.'n - 't~,,_,,:,".i:i';.. ~"';'i:;"t"...i;.,..:.~iW ! f I ! / - . MllIUtU - COIMIIIITY AI"L\UIICI: IOAlID IO"III'rOII a&IoCII. I'LOBl DA - JUlIl: 20 1988 .- II_irMA "._Ired tbat tile 0II1y Ca.. "".r. th.y would loa.. to _ betor. the c:u tor a 819n would be 1f 1t 90t to be eoeethl~ th.y had not COAt.89lAted and pc..ented O~bel'w1.. the,.. would be no C'..a.on. for th.. to co.. back .... J.eg.r Infor..d Mr. Vhe.. tlla~ ~he .l\lne would hAve ~o lie _Irdl~ to <:04. * ~eg.r -val. wlabed 'h. IO&cd to r.all.. th.t the policy of ~ City Coeal..1_ 1. that .11 cba~.a In .l..atloo. ~ back throU4h the .y.t.. aDd are to ... r..l.wed by all Ioalrd. He a.ked the c:u to UA4e1r.taad tbat th.y wer. MUl\9 a 1r_D4atloa ""lc" _. _t III .9r.._nt wll" the g....UAt pollcy IIIn1 BUUllua - UVlllIOllS TO 'UVIOUSLY AP'IOVED SU'I ,LAIIS 1 'lroj.ct M.... Boynton Lak.. , U 0 "lat 110. 4, S, . Ova.c. Boyntoo Lak.. Jolllt V.nt\llr. Av.n'. Andr.w Wltklll LoqaUolu IIocth of II- 19 Canal .outh of Hypoluao -.t ...t of IIorth Congr... Av.n... "oj.ot oeeoclpUOIl' Be.talOll of 1&I>4_pl"9 ?hI. appllcatlo. va. wlt1l4ra.. .1.ut.. a.. pA9. 9 of th... a ~.ct Ita_. Cl Av..t. Loqatlon. IIacla.r . -r .11r.t Oafocd o...lopaent Corp. C Wa...sall COl11a. 100 IIarla.r. way Legal Deeec tpUOIlI - L:t. I thrO\l9b 23 laclu.l... and ~lract. A~ . C D.nd I. a. .bown Oft 'lat of ..rln.r. -.y .. recorded In 'lat look sa 'a9. It' ~llc "cord. of "al. "ach COWIty rlorlcU ,coj.ct o..erlptlOa. Chan9. ..... color of .tucco on two t>>Illdl"",. c. .....sall COllin., 6'0 U. I. K19hway '1, North "al. aeach, rL 3340', to14 the We....r. thay hava four bul141n9. Oa. ha. ba.a COapl.tad and C.O d Th. applicAnt want.d to chAng. Building. Band D to the ..tant of 119htanln9 ~he at"ceo to a 119ht.r color IU Col1ln. a.plaload and addad that tbe canopr 1. belh4 ch&A9a4 to a eor. tradlt,onal -21- I i I '" TO: PERMIT APPLICANT FROM BUILDING DEPARTI1ENT SUBJECT SUBMITTAL OF PLANS PROJECT NAME Quan turn Park t Sites 4 & 5 File #081 Prior to sUbmitting plans and specifications to the Building Department, it will be necessary that the staff's comments made during the preliminary review and approved ~y the City Council of Boynton Beach be properly addressed and rectified Each department must be visited and the provisios corrected to the satisfaction of the department. In order for the Building Department to accept permits, this sign-off sheet must be presented off, without any provisios. This is necessary confusion and speed-up the permitting process. applications for properly signed to eliminate , APPROVED TECHNICAL COMMITTEE FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Building Department Fire Department /I ~ lii <;g I~ kfld'f" 9"'h/~ Engineering Department Utility Department Police Department Public Works Department Planning Department ~ lo(/~!f L Recreation Department Community Redevelopment Agency Forester/Horticulturist ~ 10 -b -&8 Note: Because the Building Department will accept plans providing all changes, it should be the last department to review them ( ( , '- l ... ,.., '\ MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JUNE 21, 1988 This item was removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion at the request of Commissioner Olenik. See discussion after Consent Agenda. 5. Project Name: Agent: Owners: Location: Legal Description: Description: Quantum Office Park Adolfo J. Cotilla, Jr., ACAI Associates, Inc. Quantum Associates Quantum Boulevard at the L W.D.D. E-4 Canal southeast corner Lot 5 of the Plat of QUANTUM PARK, Plat No.2, together with a portion of Tract "H", a drainage easement, in said Plat, said portion being designated as 5-A and Lot 4 of said Plat of Quantum Park, Plat No 2 together with a portion of said Tract "H", said portion being designated as 4-B, and together with that portion of the L.W.D.D. Canal E-4, a drainage easement as said drainage easment is shown on said. Plat, said portion being designated as 4-A SITE PLAN - Request for site plan approval to construct a 47,598 square foot office complex on 6 96 acres The Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended approv- al of this request, subject to staff comments. Additionally, the P&Z Board recommended that the City Commission accept a building elevation that is general in nature, as it relates to the location of doors and windows, as the locations of doors and windows will change based upon tenant occupancy. ~ Mr. Annunziato noted that the CAB voted to give administra- tive relief in the requirement for a hedge along the lake. Mayor Cassandra felt that a meeting between the Mayor and Commissioners and the Boards was needed so that the Boards would be fully aware of their job and how it relates to other Boards and to the City as a whole. 6 project name: Agent Owners Loction: Manor Care Personal Care Facility Bernard Kelly/Ivan Roekez Manor Health Care Corporation South Congress Avenue at Charter Drive, northwest corner -8- ci .....,. riLL R~I''' 1,. r"r1 LauJ.:r.lal" Olll.'~ QUANTUM COl{PORATE PARk May 1, 1990 Mr Michael Haag Zoning and Site Development Administrator City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 Re Quantum Park. Sites 20 and 21. Allstate Building Dear Michael I am writing to you in response to my discussion with Kevin Hallahan in which he has advised me that he cannot approve the project until Item 3 of his TRB comment is resolved This comment pertained to the requirement to screen the parking lot from sites directly across the lake Kevin further indicated in his comments that he would review the site with the applicant to make a determination that additional plantings are not required for visual screening Evidently, Kevin has now determined he is not satisfied Therefore, I am requesting your i ntervent i 9n in an effort to fi na lly resolve this issue so that we may proceed wtth the project As you may recall, the subject was di scussed at the TRB Meeting and represents identical circumstances to the lakeside Commons project which received CAB and City Commission approvals to construct the project without planting additional landscaping to screen the parking lot Additionally, it was requested that the same criteria be established for all sites which adjoin the lake areas under identical circumstances The focus of our request to delete the additional hedge to screen the rear of the property was centered on the folloWing facts I} The property lines of these sites are located in the center of the lake providing a minimum of 200 feet between parking lots, but averaging approximately 600 feet between the rear of the parking lots Extensive landscaping has been planted within the lake areas pursuant to Development Order conditions to establish native Hardwood Swamp Vegetation Upon reaching maturity, this landscaping will provide an unstructured visual barrier between the properties located in closest proximity to each other (200 feet) 2) A Dt'''l.}('''' Irelund Propt'rrit'f- Md.-in ~ill/oll JU;1Il V..mu"1I Th~ IllIlllw~r · ~I" nll,'r. 110 Sl}ulh~a"il Sixlh ~lr.:.:1 . Fori Uiud.:rdal~ Florida J.:l:lOk\.HS Br,.wanl 1J(151 76J-KXXH. FAX IJO-'.I 7hJ.K99h. Palm B.:ach 14U71 7}.1-.l~jS . Dad.: 1"\11';'1 'J-I 5-li I III . 1iOO-I21 jll-l Th.: nuildin~. 1125 Nunh~asl 125 Slreel . Nonh Miami, Flurida :\:\IM IJ05Ili'JI-hNlh. FAX 1J(1~lli,)S-li2-11 ,-/' ../..... ------ ----------~-- -- - -" ....., Mr Michael Haag, Continued May 1, 1990 Page Two 3) The installation of a structured hedge would detract from the aesthetic values of the lake areas and further reduce market incentive to site a project on premium lake fronts 4) It is evident that this issue is the result of Article II, Section 7 5(e) of the Boynton Beach Landscape Code, "Perimeter Landscaping Relating to Abutting Properties" The intent of this section was to provide a criteria for properties with convnon property 1 ines with more traditional setback requirements between parking 10ts It is c1ear that the code did not anticipate convnercial development on 1akes in which average setback between rear parking lots would exceed 600 feet Due to the circumstances provided within Quantum Corporate Park, I request your approval of the TRB comment regarding this issue for Sites 20 and 21 If you do not believe this is within your jurisdiction to authorize, I respectfully request that this item be put on the agenda for consideration by the Conununity Appearance Board at the ear1 iest opportunity If you require any additional information, please contact me at your earliest convenience , Thank you for your consideration /d;?/~( MICHAE[ ~;<ot,.et( Development Manager MJT aem CC Mr Scott Hiller Mr Kevin Hallahan Mr George W Zinvnerman Mr Steven W Deutsch Mr Bob Dalia \ \ ~ .- ~ON & PARK MEMORANDUM #90-069 TO: Tim Cannon, Interim Planning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Horticulturist SUBJECT: Quantum Office Park - Site Plan DATE: February 6, 1990 The following comments pertain to landscaping at the above site: L~~ L ,<\l~7 1. ) ( , r The size of the saw palmetto species should be noted on the landscape legend. 30% ot. the landscape plants (not trees) must be native ln1'>ulf-~ ." - -.- 2. 3. The applicant should be aware that the rear of the property ; upland hardwood plantings) m~st . lot from sites directly across e \.h~ the applicant to make ~l plantings are not required for visual screening. 4. If there are any locations along the lake edge abutting the two sites where soil erosion has occurred, the areas must be sodded. This will be determined with a site review by the applicant and myself. 5. The phase II site must be seeded and receive irrigation to prevent blowing sand, until the site is developed. 6. on the \\11 \'V \: 7. Potable water cannot be used for landscaped areas. .. .- ~~A~9- o//4/h~ Kevin J Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist .. KJH ad 'It' i~'li.~ S7 17 Peripheral greenbelt The project area shall be enclosed on all sides with the exception of accessways for traffic and freight by a landscaped area with a minimum width of twenty-five (25) feet except when such property abuts a residential district such greenbelt shall have a minimum width of forty (40) feet It shall be the responsibility of the owner or developer to carry out this requirement, and to provide such maintenance or guarantee of maintenance, subject to planning and development board I PROCEOURES FOR ZONING LAND TO PIO The procedure for zoning land to the PIO classification shall be the same as for zoning land generally Because of the differences in PIO developments and the concept of unified control in development, the following procedures and requirements shall apply to applications for zoning to the PID classification in addition to the general requirements 1 Applications, materials to be submitted In addition to information required for application for zoning generally, the applicant shall submit the following materials or data a Legal documents assuring unified control of the proposed PIO and the agreements required under subsection 0 b A master site development plan containing (1) The title of the project and the names of the professional project planner and the developer, (2) Scale, date, north arrow, and general location map; (3) Boundaries of the property involved, all existing streets, buildings, watercourses, easements, section lines and other existing important physical features in and adjoining the project, (4) Site plan of locations of land uses including but not limited to industrial areas, greenbelts and proposed rights-of-way, (S) Master plan showing access and traffic flow; and (6) Tabulations of total gross acreage in the development and the percentages thereof to be devoted to the various land uses c Repealed by Ord No 78-37, S 1 Adopted April 4 1"5 Ordi~eDce 0'5 02 ".vi...c1 2-65 ---~-------~~--~-~~-~ < o '" V1 o i;': :E : ~ ~ U V1 r- s ;( Z ~ ~~ O -0:) <( iz t'z ~~i8 C) z -en I-Z Z<t <t-l zra. \'f) ..... ~ I f'- ~ OCll ZW <~ WN C)...l 0< Wa: wO ~1- <I:: ...l...l .-1. 'f, ;'t[ !1 .~ ;~"ZTf !-'l' -, , t '!~j ill!} .1 i~ ii " H j' 01 " P i_ " ~~ , ~\lii i' 'I !m\I:~ilrJ,:!~11 f ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ :; w ! H. ~I ~~, -~--UH ~ --~~~~ine w ~'~d~iI. ~i ....J '" ) 0( 'I. ~ .......1 _ ~ ~lI'i!, ~ ~Q ~J ~~q i . fit ~d ! i- 'I,; i I - ~ o. " I I ti ,. . ! ".~ ~ :';".!'.:.' . ~!~ l:BJ' i\ :\ \\ .~ \ . i '~~?1;.1 'r' . i ,<fIt~~' ~~~ .-. . i/ ii_" 'II <.i ~ l/l UJ ~ <3 o l/l ~ all Z UJ ~ o ,coo en .J~ t; ~i ~ ~~ ~ ~; "" 0:" <.i i z , ;h ~ a; ~ UJ , UJ . Z ~ (5 z UJ (;)g c(~ >g c(": -'''' c(~ .. :E~ ~ ~3 UJ -c UJ l/lo. z l/l~ c; 0: ffi -"3: l' litO~Dt l ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~, ~~ ~lil ~~ .~ o~ ~_d ~~ .".Z 1-4 ~G' 2'5 cf~ ~~ ~~ ;~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~rt~ -Ill' .......