The URL can be used to link to this page

CORRESPONDENCE TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD PO BOX310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 PHONE (561) 742-6260 FAX (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION Date From Re D Ray Eubanks, Community Program Administrator DCA, 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd, Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 May 14, 2001 Lusia Galav, AICP, Principal Planner Quantum Park Amendment #11, Certified copy of D 0 w/exhibit To TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD PO BOX310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 PHONE (561) 742-6260 FAX. (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION Date From Re Jim Snyder, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 301-E Ocean Blvd #300, Stuart, FL 34994 May 14, 2001 Lusia Galav, AICP, Principal Planner Quantum Park Amendment #11, Certified copy of D 0 w/exhibit To CertIf"icatIOn IS generally done by your agency clerk and reads sunllar to the followmg Hereby Certlly that the forgomg IS a true and correct copy of as approved by the Board of CommISSIOners at Its regular meetmg held . whIch IS on file In the office of Witness mv hand and offiCIal seal thIS day of --- ., SIgnature Block ( .. C) CJ-l =f-< :1: -<0 ~ !, -" I 0,) -c -- -< ....;-.:.,. ~ /. ......:. Cj '::::J:= \.0 -'1 CJ -(Tl N CJ J:> o-J fT1 0 .::I: ---------- D /0:1 __ ()) )O!/d I fle~ h2~ k f- ~V(d.e Yl?e l-vl~ o COfi.l0 cry- cc ,I C Br2 -Ii -t,..pd tI 1), () Je e JQn~h-e :km, DOo) cuda(/~cJ lfAwir- 'Pe/&m (X'(J1rrU U ' fa m.ll , dU-A.4 I i ! , ) " ~ 1)1.. ~ ~t-/ ,rJ ()-'~ . V' ~ r;J-~ ~ U~V~LUtJMt:' UKUr,t( ur- I nt: \.III ,\.IUIVIIVllo:)\ "'<1 vr IIIL.. CI -, OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORID'- PROJECT NAME Quantum Park NOPC/Master Plan Amend #11 APPLICANT'S AGENT Eugene Gerlica/Quantum Group of Companies APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 2500 Quantum Lakes Drive DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION February 20,2001 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT Notice of Proposed Change (NO PC) to the Quantum Park DRI Development Order to change the Master Plan land use designations on Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 23, 24, 25,26,27,28,29,30 and 31 LOCATION OF PROPERTY Quantum Park DRI DRAWING(S) SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above The City Commission hereby adopts the findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows OR X THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows. 1 Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations, 2. The Applicant HAS --X- HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested 3 The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included" 4 The Applicant's application for relief is hereby _ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof 1- DENIED 5 This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. DATED All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the ~~mRfl!! and conditions of this order ~\\\\or 80,!III/'-1: ~ _I rA. ~ ~~, .......... f'1r" ll.. ~ ~" .' cORA" '0 ~ Other ~ 0- :..~'~ O-S;"'~ 't- % == i ~: OJ = ! ~: m :: , :~::: -. ~.C)- ;:::, -<'..... V ~ j ~ Oh .....- ~ ~ '7/DA ~ "~I ~\\" 1///111 1/11\\\\\\\ -OJ 6 7 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home JEB BUSH Governor STEVEN M. SEIBERT Secretar( May 3 2001 Mr Michael Rumpf Plannmg & Zoning DIrector Department of Development City of Bovnton Beach Post Office Box 3 10 Boynton Beach, rL 33425-0310 Re Quantum Park, File Number ADA-I084-048 Dear Mr Rumpf The DepaItment is 111 receipt of the development order for the Quantum Park dl'w!opment of regional impact (DRI) which was rendered to the Department on April 30 2001 Rule 9J-2 025(5), Flonda AdminIstrative Code, states, In part. that the rendering ofa development order IS the issuance ofa wntten development order and the transmittal ofa certified completed CQ2i. of the order by the local govemment with JunsdictlOn, together with all pertincnt attachment~. (t further states that A DRI development order will not be conSIdered to have been rendered if all pages, exhibIts, references and attachments are not mcludcd. The Department does not conSider the Quantum Park DRl deveiopment order as having been properiv rendered because development order was not certified Therefore, the Department's 45-day review penod for the development order has not been tnggered Please transmit to the Department a certified copy of the development order with an original city seal affixed, including a coPY of an exhibits. Attached is sample certificatIOn language Our appeal pef/od will begm when we arc rendered a certified and complete copy of the order If you have any questions conceming thIS matter pkase call Donna Harris in the Bureau of~tate Planning at (850) 488-4925 Sincerely &.4~ o Rav Eubanks CommunIty Program Administrator -im1 f;' V - 7 2001 I'! II _JI ___i ! ; DRE!dh cc Mr Jim Snyder Treasure Coast RPC Developer - r CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE 2796 Overseas Hlghwav Suite 212 Marathon Fl 3050-2227 (305) 289-2402 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE FLORIDA 323992100 Phone (850) 488 8466/Suncom 278 8466 FAX (850) 921 0781/Suncom 291 0781 Internet address b.ttp I/www.dca.state.fl.us COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 255S Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Ta!iahassee FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee. FL 32399-2100 (85m 488-2356 {B50) 4129969 HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Bouievard Tallahassee. Fl32399.2100 (350) 488...7956 CertIficatIOn IS generally done by your agency clerk and reads sImIlar to the folloWIng Hereby CertIfY that the forgoIng IS a true and correct copy of approved by the Board of _____ CommISSIoners at Its regular meetmg held WhICh IS on file m the office of Witness mv hand and officIal seal thIS day of SIgnature Block as W OOlli.7.i .~~ ON v DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT fILE COpy Planning and Zoning Division · Building Planning & Zoning Occupational Licenses Community Redevelopment April 27, 2001 Mr Roger Wilburn Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Dr Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Re Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DRI - Amendment No 11 (Our Ref No DRIA 00-002) Dear Mr Wilburn. Please be advised that on February 20, 2001 the above referenced NOPC request failed to pass first reading of the Ordinance Attached is a copy of the Development Order denying the request and a copy of the City Commission minutes from the February 20, 2001 meeting If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Lusia Galav, Principal Planner at (561) 742-6262, Sincerely, ?We Michael Rumpf Planning & Zoning Director Attachments MRlLG CC' Jim Cherof, City Attorney Lusia Galav, Principal Planner Eugene A. Gerlica P E. Quantum Group of Companies IICHIMAINISHRDATAIPlanninglSHAREDIWPIPROJECTSIQuantum Park Amend. #11lQuantum Park DRIAIDCA Denial.Let2.doc City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., POBox 310 . Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Phone (561) 742-6260 . Fax (561) 742-6259 . www,cLboynton-beach.fl.us ~'.\TY 0/> 'o,r~c7 '17 ~ ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT fILE COpy Planning and Zoning Division . Building Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment April 27, 2001 Mr James Snyder Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 301-E Ocean Blvd #300 Stuart, Florida 34994 Re Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DRI - Amendment No 11 (Our Ref No. DRIA 00-002) Dear Mr Snyder' Please be advised that on February 20, 2001 the above referenced NOPC request failed to pass first reading of the Ordinance Attached is a copy of the Development Order denying the request and a copy of the City Commission minutes from the February 20, 2001 meeting If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Lusia Galav, Principal Planner at (561) 742-6262 Sincerely, 7JJ2- Michael Rumpf Planning & Zoning Director Attachments MRlLG CC' Jim Cherof, City Attorney Lusia Galav, Principal Planner Eugene A. Gerlica P E. Quantum Group of Companies IICH\MAINISHRDA T AIPlanning\SHAREDIWPlPROJECTS\Quanlum Pari< Amend. #11 IQuantum Pari< DRIAITCRPC DeniaI.Let2.doc City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., PO. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Phone (561) 742-6260 . Fax (561) 742-6259 . www.ci.boynton-beach,fl.us DEVELOPME ORDER OF THE CITY COMMI$ IN OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PROJECT NAME Quantum Park NOPC/Master Plan Amend #11 ~(Q)LPW APPLICANT'S AGENT Eugene Gerlica/Quantum Group of Companies APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 2500 Quantum Lakes Drive DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION February 20,2001 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) to the Quantum Park DRI Development Order to change the Master Plan land use designations on Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 23, 24, 25 26,27,28,29,30 and 31 LOCATION OF PROPERTY Quantum Park DRI DRAWING(S) SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above The City Commission hereby adopts the findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows OR X THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows 1 Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations 2 The Applicant HAS -L HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested 3 The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included" 4 The Applicant's application for relief is hereby _ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof 1- DENIED 5 This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the ~EWim~{{11 and conditions of this order ~'\\\\\of 80.1111/<< ~ YA, ~ ~ ........ ........... ~.. % ... .... .' COR"'" ,,~ '/ Oth .;:::; '" ...~ ""0", 0 ':::0 er .::: CJ ,1- ~... 't-. -:;:. .. '"7--- : "-1 rn :: . m- .....,., - ! 0: m == ~ : :J:;. :::: -:;:. '. Vv. " ~ , ;(\ _.. _.).,.1 ;:: . ,- .;::: ~ 0 ....... .;::. ~/1. ~/DA ....# '/111 \", 111/11111\\\\\\ -01 6 7 DATED b .... ... -~~..:.- I ! EXHIBIT lie' ; If; II - oil · . :; a ~ II J I I I ~ 11. ~i i ae. ~N I ....~ o N ,.: rD ~ i ;= i 82 i ~~~ ; 5Z - I~~ ~ ! I"" I ~!: iii, i ! ~ M~J~~li:i.' J - gJ nm;;~i! I i i i i i i i i i ~ =::: I : I = Ii:';:';;;; ~ z ::> o III :.: ~ 11. rm I ! j . ; ; ~ i ~ I ~ I J !! ~ i : i ; ~ J I!:o;~ai! ;. 0 i UIII . :nca ..... ... .w .. .. . Z 'I .. . . : I II IS I . : I~ I Ii I :S :S i ;i i ~ .. J Ii ~.: :pf i I: I ~ !d; J I!! ~ :'IJ1 c! n: I I :.,Iitl;;iil: ,I1,Ir Jill' i ~ !I !I II d n I ! . ~ . . '~y~11 i . ~ I . . j i ! i J ~ i ~ ~ Ql~ a! 1il~ ~I ~ t 1 ! . j ! . . s J i i ~ i Ii ~. Meeting Minutes Regular City Commission Boynton Beach, Florida February 20, 2001 ~ the Comprehensive Plan by adopting the proper land use from Local Retail Commercial (LCR) to High Density Residential (HDR) Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinance No 01-11 by title only Mr Herb Suss feels that this project is going to result in traffic havoc and is opposed to the project. Mr Suss stated that every time the City wants to do anything, the zoning is changed Perhaps it is time to have new zoning standards in the City Motion Commissioner Ferguson moved to approve Proposed Ordinance No Weiland seconded the motion City Clerk Kruse polled the vote. (Commissioner Black dissenting) B. Ordinances - 1st Reading 01-11 Vice Mayor The vote was 4-1 1 Proposed Ordinance No. 01-12 Re Amending the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances to change the Senior Advisory Board meeting schedule from monthly to quarterly Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinance No. 01-12 by title only Motion Commissioner Black moved to approve Proposed Ordinance No 01-12. Vice Mayor Weiland seconded the motion. City Clerk Kruse polled the vote. The vote was unanimous. 2. Proposed Ordinance No. 01-13 Re Amending the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances for Planning & Development Board meetings regarding the fourth Tuesday of each month Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinance No 01-13 by title only Commissioner Ferguson noted that the intent of the ordinance is to reduce the Planning and Development Board meetings from twice monthly to once a month, however, the Chairman has the ability to call a meeting anytime he sees fit. Commissioner Ferguson questioned the rationale of the ordinance. Motion Commissioner Black moved to approve Proposed Ordinance No. 01-13 Motion seconded by Commissioner Ferguson City Clerk Kruse polled the vote. The vote was unanimous. 3 Proposed Ordinance No. 01-14 Re. Providing for a determination whether changes to the Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact approved in Ordinance No. 84-51, and amended in Ordinances Nos. 86-11, 86-37, 88-3, 94-10, 94-51, 96-33, 96-65, 97-20, 99-05 and 00-02 constitute a substantial deviation under Chapter 380 06, 17 .'" Meeting Minutes Regular City Commission Boynton Beach, Florida -., .,. February 20, 2001 Florida Statutes, 1996 and whether further development of Regional Impact review is necessary regarding such changes, approving such changes and amending the Development Order for purposes of incorporating the approved changes Attorney Cherof read Proposed Ordinance No 01-14 by title only Commissioner Rsher asked if staff had any updates on this item Mr Quintus Greene, Director of Development and CRA Director, took the podium and said that staff was prepared to discuss the technical merits of this case. In August 2000 the City Commission held a goals' retreat where 55 strategic initiatives in eight broad categories were developed. One category was entitled "guiding appropriate development and redevelopment in Boynton Beach" Within this category were two high priority initiatives, one to develop an outline and action plan the Federal Highway/Martin Luther King/Boynton Beach Corridor The second high initiative was for promotion of development in the City that would contribute to the diversification of the City's economy Staff feels that issues in this case go against the strategic goals outlined by the Commission less than one year ago. Mr Greene pointed out that the representatives from Quantum Park are on record that they are proposing a new downtown for Boynton Beach in Quantum Park. This is in conflict with the Commission's goal of revitalizing downtown along Federal Highway It is the opinion of the City's professional staff that Quantum's proposal is not only inconsistent with the goals of the Commission, but has the potential to actually damage existing and future revitalization efforts by diluting the multi-family residential market necessary to support the commercial rebirth of downtown Boynton Beach Also, Mr Greene pointed out that Quantum's proposal is inconsistent with the goal of promoting development that would contribute to the diversification of the City's economy This proposal removes 23 acres of land from an industrial land use category and converts it to residential development. This would be in addition to the more than 60 acres that were removed from an industrial category in the same area for essentially the same purpose just one year ago. Staff recommends that the proposed modification of the Quantum Master Plan be denied. Commissioner Fisher pointed out that Boynton Beach currently has 6,000 apartments, Delray Beach has 4,000 and Boca Raton has 4,000 and questioned if a new analysis should be undertaken from an apartment point of view on how much the City could absorb. Commissioner Fisher said that he did not see enough commercial construction in Quantum to support additional apartments at this time. Vice Mayor Weiland noted that last March the Commission was asked to approve 500 residential units in Quantum Park and this was agreed to by all parties. Now Quantum is coming back asking for an additional 500 apartments before the first shovel of dirt has been turned Vice Mayor Weiland felt that 500 additional apartments was not warranted in Quantum Park. Commissioner Black felt that the Commission should follow staff's recommendation Commissioner Black noted that when the first project was approved last March, there is still no permit waiting in City Hall to build the mixed-use offices, the movie theater, the 76,650 square 18 Meeting Minutes Regular City Commission Boynton Beach, Florida February 20, 2001 ." # feet of restaurants, and the 82,000 square feet of office space. Mr Black has concerns that the projects will remain strictly residential and the mixed-use will never come to fruition ,. Commissioner Ferguson pointed out that the Commission is not being asked to approve any more apartments and this is merely a conceptual design being presented tonight. Commissioner Ferguson pointed out that the Planning & Development Board voted 6-1 in favor of the project, as well as it being approved by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Commissioner Fisher felt it was an issue of timing and if this particular piece of property was difficult to build on, perhaps the City and representatives of Quantum could sit down and discuss the issue. Commissioner Fisher feels that the City should cooperate with Quantum and sit down and discuss with them what the City would like to see go up on this land. Mayor Broening did not feel that this project would compete with a downtown project and that in staff's report it states that the demand for apartments for Palm Beach County is great and Mayor Broening feels the demand is there. Mayor Broening also pointed out that the development is essentially built out except for a relatively few acres. He stated that he supports the project conceptually, but also feels that the Commission should listen to staff Because this is first reading of an ordinance, there is no public input. However, Mayor Broening asked Mr Wische, Chairman of the Planning and Development Board to make any comments if he so wished. Mr. Lee Wische, 1302 SW 18th Street noted that the project came before the Planning and Development Board as a conceptual project and would not be built tomorrow The other phase must be built first, but the applicant needs the go ahead in order to make future plans. Mayor Broening asked Attorney David Norris to comment on behalf of the applicant. Mr Norris disagreed that not much has been accomplished since the applicant's first mixed-use project had been approved last March. Mr Norris pointed out that after that approval, it was necessary for them to request a change in the code to permit a mixed-use development, which took a great deal of time. The applicant then went through the site plan process for Grotto Bay, the residential component of the project. Mr Norris stated they were close to having the building permits issued to begin development. After that, they plan on coming into the City with their Master Plan for the entire development. Mr Norris also pointed out that they offered their staff to assist the City staff with the City's park project. Further, Mr Norris said there was a demand for apartments and they would not be building apartments if the demand was not there. Also, the area being proposed for the project is a prime area for residential mixed-use component. Mr Norris also stated that they were required by Code to do the mixed-use, but staff previously indicated that that they did not want to get into the timing and that this was the developer's decision Mr Norris requested that the project be allowed Vice Mayor Weiland said that Mr McDonald told him last March that the project would begin in July or August of 2000. To date nothing has happened. Vice Mayor Weiland suggested that after the 62-acre project is completed, that the applicant come back to the Commission if the need for more residential surfaces. Vice Mayor Weiland saw no urgency tonight to approve the l conceptual idea. / 19 Meeting Minutes Regular City Commission Boynton Beach, Florida ,., ..., February 20, 2001 Mr Norris reiterated that it has taken this long to get started with the first project due to the newness of the mixed-use designation to the City and they are on the verge of getting their permits. Mr Bressner pointed out that the City worked with Quantum to change the Code to assist them in process and the City recognized that the zoning ordinance was not applicable to what Quantum wanted and the City accommodated them Mayor Broening reported that the Commission was here tonight to consider the applicant's concept for this particular piece of property Mayor Broening did not feel that the 55 initiatives set by the City applied to this application. Mr Greene felt the issue is where the City wants to focus its efforts in terms of development. Mr Greene said that in order for Boynton Beach to have a viable cOl11mercial downtown it is absolutely essential that the City has a strong residential base to support it. Mr Rumpf, Director of Planning, pointed out that there is a need for rental units, but questioned how long the need would last. Mr Rumpf also noted that it will take a greater effort to develop the downtown than placing units in Quantum Park. Mr Rumpf felt if units went up elsewhere in the City, it could weaken the efforts being made in the downtown Mr Eugene Gerlica, representing the Quantum Group, said that many of the facts stated by Mr Greene are wrong Mr Gerlica stated that the initiative was done in August 2000 and the mixed-use project of 62 acres was approved in March 2000. He stated that they have been working aggressively in both the planning and permitting stages. With regard to the loss of 23 acres of industrial land, Mr Gerlica pointed out that only seven acres have office or industrial use designation and there has been very little interest for industrial use in this land Of the 62 acres in the first project, 22 1/2 acres was designated attraction and recreation and on the south side, 22 acres was commercial Mr Gerlica stated that it takes 120 days to get a South Florida Water Management permit in order to move the dirt and that permit application was made in December 1999 After the approval came through to clear the land and move the dirt, application was made to the City Also, they redesigned the Clubhouse. Mr Gerlica stated that they have joint ventured the entire development with Owen Development that builds apartments throughout the County and is now focusing upon the Palm Beach County market. They have built in Delray Beach and Manatee Bay in Boynton Beach It is anticipated that the Master Site Plan will be submitted in mid-April Mr Bressner said that staff proceeds based upon a number of information points, technical review; impact; various merits of a development; and a great deal of consideration is given to what staff has directed as priorities in the City Mr Bressner pointed out that staff has taken a great deal of credence of the 55 initiatives adopted by resolution by the Commission and as Mr Greene indicated, those two directives are prime directives. Staff has determined that this particular project is out of sync with those priorities. Further, the Intracoastal and Federal Highway Corridor were viewed as prime directives by this Commission. Also, Mr Bressner stated that the proposal by the Planning and Development Board to add an additional six acres of industrial classification was not presented to the Regional Planning Agencies. Therefore, staff does not know if the addition of those six acres has to be remanded back to the Planning Agencies. 20 .... Meeting Minutes Regular City Commission Boynton Beach, Florida February 20, 2001 -) Attorney Cherof felt that at some point the Planning Councils will insist upon having the opportunity to review this; either by the applicant resubmitting it or alternatively via an appeal Mr Norris replied that they did not ask for the additional six acres of industrial classification, but it was a condition of the Planning and Development Board They would be agreeable to deleting this condition as it was put in merely to address a concern of staff Mayor Broening felt that the downtown area would be market driven as other areas in the City are improved. Vice Mayor Weiland also was not certain if this would dilute the downtown and he has always shown his support for Quantum in the past. However, at this present time there is nothing that would show there is a need for this conceptual idea tonight. Commissioner Black would like to see the first development move along and the City be shown a sign of good faith by proceeding with the mixed-use portion of the project. Commissioner Black did not see the need for any additional apartments in the City and that Manatee Bay is over 50% vacant. Commissioner Black suggested that this project could come back to the Commission at a future date. Mr Bressner also stated that the City needs jobs and that by bringing in a mixed-use project, some jobs have been eliminated, which staff also pointed out to the Planning & Development Board Also, the cost for providing services for residential development is more costly than those provided to employment-based development. Motion ) Commissioner Ferguson moved to approve No. 01-14 Mayor Broening passed the gavel and seconded the motion City Clerk Kruse polled the vote. Tl1e motion failed 2-3 (Commissioner Fisher, Wce Mayor Weiland and Commissioner Black dissenting). C. Resolutions: None D Other' 1 Ratification of Code Compliance Board action a Rescind the fine in Case #96-5124 (2216 NE 3rc1 Street). The original fine totaled $31,650 plus $922.21 in administrative costs. o Commissioner Rsher noted that he was questioning the finding in this case. Commissioner Fisher felt that the administrative costs should have at least been covered. Mr Scott Blasie, Code Compliance Administrator, responded that there was no hardship in this case, but the party that applied for the reduction was a third party and is removed from the case because the applicant was trying to purchase property in Delray Beach, and not the property in Boynton Beach. Mr Blasie reported that notification was good and it was noted that the person who received notice of the violations back in 1996 was deemed mentally incompetent shortly thereafter and lost the property in foreclosure. The Boynton Beach property was eventually purchased at foreclosure and has been brought into compliance. 21 ~ .., -. Meeting Minutes Regular City Commission Boynton Beach, Florida February 20, 2001 The Boynton Beach lien attached to the property in Delray Beach, which necessitated the applicant coming in to apply for a lien reduction Mayor Broening inquired if the administrative costs were incurred by the new owner or the previous owner and Mr Blasie stated it was the previous owner Commissioner Fisher replied that he felt the City should recover its administrative costs and did not feel that the fine should be assessed Mr Vince Zabik took the podium and stated that he purchased the property in Delray Beach and when he purchased the property, he did do a title search However, it was the Boynton Beach property that had the original lien and the lien attached to both properties. Mr Zabik stated that when he appeared before the Code Compliance Board he was told that the lien would be released and subsequently closed on the Delray Beach property Now, Mr Zabik said he is back before the City and that he purchased the property because he was told that the lien would be released Commissioner Fisher felt that the person who purchased the Boynton Beach property should pay the administrative costs and asked if that person was present? There was no response. Mayor Broening asked what the actual costs to the City were and Mr Blasie responded it was man hours and the cost for recording the documents, which was $250 00 Motion Commissioner Ferguson moved to rescind the fine in Case #96-5124 except for $250 00, which represents the out-of-pocket costs to record the documents. Vice Mayor Weiland seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-1 (Commissioner Rsher dissenting). Vice Mayor Weiland requested that if Mr Blasie comes before the Commission in the future with any lien reduction cases, he would like to have his item placed at the beginning of the meeting because Mr Blasie waited three hours to be heard Mr Bressner said he could add these cases under Manager's Report. . 2. Status Report of Orbit's Conditional Use Approval (February 20, 2001) Police Chief Marshall Gage reported on the following. ./ The Commission granted the Orbit Nightclub a conditional use license on October 17, 2000 and the permit was issued on October 20th The applicant at that time did not get a business license. ./ The Club opening took place on November 3rd through the 5th ./ On November 4th a large party took place and they were issued a notice to appear for operating without a license. ./ After another large party on November 11th, another notice to appear for operating without a license was issued. ./ The Manager was issued the notice on one occasion and Carl Brockdoff, the owner, was issued a notice to appear on the second occasion. ./ A business license was issued on November 22nd ./ On December 14th the owner and manager failed to appear in court and were arrested that evening for failure to appear Those charges have subsequently been resolved and both charges resulted in a $75 00 fine. 22 Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD POBOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX. (561) 742-6259 PIANNING AND ZONING DIVISION To Fax # Date From Re n / ~ rlYh Ck~(.~ !V{(Jr9-fM ~-e.- V 0CS-L/ --f:}t 0 C; /01 . &-(.4' gJa~" iJZU1~ /)UIA.-~"L. {JuzduJ.// ~Pt 4-11 hJOh.al ~ llUl -10 rrs il-etL Rt i 3 If (! Pages 3 Pfanning and Zonmg Division City of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach Florida 33425 742-6260 Fax; 742-6259 1- ~AI"iSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 133/135/213131 15 32 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613756259 TEL 56137562613 DATE. TIME FAX NO./NAME DURA T IO~~ PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 83/05 15 38 6854 130 01 10 03 OK STA~mARD ECM STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Governor STEVEN M, SEIBERT Secretary February 28, 2001 Ms. Lusla Galav, AICP Pnncipal Planner Department of Development DIvisIOn of Plannmg & Zomng 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. POBox 310 Boynton Beach Flonda 33425-0310 Re Quantum Park DR! DCA Project File No ADA-I084-048 Notification of Proposed Change (Amendment No 11) Dear Ms. Galav' Thank you for your letter dated February 20,2001, regardmg Lot 34C WIthm the Quantum Park DR!. Your letter IS subsequent to your telephone mqUIry WIth Joseph Addae- Mensa, Planner IV, on February 16,2001 You indIcated that the Plannmg and Development Board of the City of Boynton Beach voted to add a condItion to the proposed amendment (Amendment No 11) to the Development Order for the Quantum Park DR!, to deSIgnate Lot 34C, currently set aSIde for stormwater detentiOn, Industnallal1.d use on the DPJ Master Plan. The proposed change to aSSIgn Industnalland use deSIgnatIOn to Lot 34C was not part of the ongmal NOPC (Amendment No 11) to the Quantum Park DR!, whIch the Department recently reviewed and raIsed no objectIOn to the proposed changes (Our letter dated February 2, 2001) Stormwater management IS a regIOnal Issue and removmg the detentIOn area may create new regIOnal Impacts that reqUire reVIew Therefore, the Department recommends that the CIty should not adopt the proposed land use change regarding Lot 34C, but can adopt.those changes ---------- already reviewed. If the City wishes to change Lot 34C, It should do so as a sepau.it., ~~__._____~~~. ;~ ~" amendment, ; <' II i I r I : i Hf.\R -5 2001 I~i I I I 2 5 5 5 S HUM A R D 0 A K B 0 U LEV A R DoT ALL A HAS SEE, F LOR I D A 3 i 3 9 ~21ifo Phone 850488 8466/Suncom 2788466 FAX 850921 0781/Suncom ~[9nr~~g~F~:TOr:[)[VfLOPMENT! Internet address http //www dca state fl us - -. CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 Marathon, Fl 33050-2227 (305) 289-2402 COMMUNITY PLANNING 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Fl 32399-2100 (850) 488-2356 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100 (850) 413-9969 HOUSING I< COMMUNITY DEVElOPMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100 (850) 488-7956 Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD PO BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORI DA 33425-0310 FAX. (561) 742-6259 PlANNING AND ZONING DIVISION To Fax # Date From Re h cw-",! ) /1//dMtLo ?-<!- ,os-r C12-/:Zl,> :01 {71t1'~iA ffdav (){)<At~-bft1 ;V()p~ :;1.// I~ ck /?7( ~ f/R I }I)-/ :i'ie.. J:" y :r Pages 3 Pfanning and Zoning DivisIOn City of Boymon Beach Boynton Beach Florida 33425 742-6260 Fax: 742-6259 L 1 TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 02/26/2001 13 04 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613756259 TEL 5613756260 DATE. TIME FAX NO mAME DURATION PAGE(S'I RESULT MODE 02/25 13 02 6054 00 01 18 03 OK STANDARD ECM treOlure co~t regional planniQg council February 22, 2001 Ms. Lusia Galav Planning and Zoning Department City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Subject: Quantum Park Development of RegIOnal Impact Notification of Proposed Change Dear Ms. Galav' In accordance with the requirements of S~ction 380 06(19), F!orida Statutes (F.S ), we have reviewed the "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously' Appt6vedDevelopment of Regional Impact (DRl)" (NOPC) for the Quantum Park DR! dated December 19,2000 The NOPC proposed reVlSlons to the master plan, which would allow lots 7,8,9,10, and 11 to be changed from office/industnal to mixed use and lots 23, 24, 25, 26,27,28,29,30, and 31 to be changed from office to mIXed use. Council reviewed the information prOVIded by the applicant and determined that the proposed changes would not create any additional regional impacts. Based on your letter of February 20,2001, the City's Plannmg and Development Board voted to add a condItion to the Quantum Park proposed amendment that would designate lot 34C as Industnal on the master plan. ThIS parcel presently has no land use designation and is to be utilIzed for detention of stormwater from the project. This change was not part of the ongmal NOPC and Council was not gIven the opportunity to determme whether thIS change would create any additIonal regional impacts. Council recommends that the City not act on the proposed change at this time and that if the City wants to go forward WIth thIS change that a new NOPC be rendered to Council and the state Department of Community Affairs for review Information should be provided in the NOPC justifymg the proposed change, in partIcular, showing that elimination of this parcel as part of the stormwater detention system for the project will not create any additional regional impacts, 301 east ocean boulevard suite 300 stuart, florida 34994 phone (561) 221-4060 sc 269-4060 fax (561) 221-4067 Ms. Lusia Galav February 22, 2001 Page 2 Please call if you have any questions Q.::re~ ~ Ov~~~~ T Snyder DR! Coordmator CC' Roger Wilburn, FDCA :'~ treQlure co~t . regional planniQg council st. lude February 22, 200 1 Ms, Lusia Galav Planning and Zoning Department City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Subject: Quantum Park Development of RegIOnal Impact Notification of Proposed Change Dear Ms. Galav' In accordance wIth the requirements of Section 38006(19), Florida Statutes (F S ), we have reviewed the "NotIfication of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact (DR!)" (NOPC) for the Quantum Park DR! dated December 19,2000 The NOPC proposed revisions to the master plan, which would allow lots 7,8,9,10, and 11 to be changed from office/industrial to mIXed use and lots 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 31 to be changed from office to mIxed use. CouncIl reviewed the informatIOn provIded by the applicant and determined that the proposed changes would not create any addItIonal regIOnal impacts. Based on your letter of February 20,2001, the City's Planmng and Development Board voted to add a condItIon to the Quantum Park proposed amendment that would designate lot 34C as Industrial on the master plan. This parcel presently has no land use deSIgnation and IS to be utilized for detention of stormwater from the project. This change was not part of the ongmal NOPC and CouncIl was not gIven the opportunity to determine whether this change would create any additIonal regIOnal Impacts. Council recommends that the City not act on the proposed change at thIS tIme and that If the CIty wants to go forward WIth this change that a new NOPC be rendered to Council and the state Department of Community Affairs for review InformatIon should be provided in the NOPC justIfymg the proposed change, in partIcular, showing that elimination of this parcel as part of the stormwater detentIon system for the project will not create any additional regional Impacts 301 east ocean boulevard suite 300 0;04\.;<.,;,',;" stuart, florida 34994 phone (561) 221.4060 sc 269-4060 fax (561) 221-4067 Ms, Lusia Galav February 22, 2001 Page 2 Please call If you have any questIOns. Q.:~:if ~ Ov~~~~ T Snyder DRI Coordmator CC' Roger Wilburn, FDCA February 15 2001 Department of Engineering and Public Works PO Box 21229 Mr Michael W Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning Department of Development City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310 West Palm Beach. FL 33416-1229 (561) 684-4000 wwwco palm-beach.flus . RE. Quantum Park - Amendment #11 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Dear Mr Rumpf' Warren H Newell. Chairman The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement (received on February 9. 2001) for the project entitled; Quantum Park - Amendment #11, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code Carol A. Roberts. Vice Chair Karen T Marcus Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the approval can not be granted due to the following' Mary McCarty The traffic generated by the high school (about 2,283 daily trips) should be counted as vested trips within the overall Quantum development traffic generation Burt Aaronson Tony Masilotti Addle L Greene If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030 Sincerely County Administrator OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Robert Weisman /1/f cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting Inc. File: General - TPS Mun - Traffic Study Review F'\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Comments\010203.doc f.-----:..;--' -:) ~ An Equal Opportumry j r;::\ \'s 1. AIf"m.">' "d", ,m"Oy~~r- fEB 1. 0 ~..' -- "l lS r \- \ \ ~ \ l ~. @ printed on recycled pap ........-~ Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD PO BOX310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX. (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION to: fax #. date: from re: ;t/;de--lM J.;Jw~ I II;;&; d~ ~ tPtJ ;;:'-/ U C/ 62-.2{) -() I cXLA $,..IA sttIcJat/j ?l2ulcz.r~ bCL/l-M ~ ~u2JdvA/1 )vDPt. #11 ~.~ ~ -r /fPf- pages. ~, including cover sheet, Planning and Zoning Division City of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach. Florida 33425 742-6260 Fax: 742-6259 ~ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 1- TIME 02/20/2001 14 51 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613756259 TEL 5613756260 DATE,TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 02/20 14 49 6054 00 01 20 03 OK STANDARD ECM Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD PO BOX310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION To Fax #. Date From Re Pages Joseph Addae-Mensa, DCA CC Roger Wilburn, DCA 850-488-3309 February 20, 2001 Lusia Galav, AICP, Principal Planner Quantum Park DRI NOPC Amendment #11 3 Planning and Zoning Division City of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 742-6260 Fax: 742-6259 '~ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 1- TIME 02/20/2001 15 10 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5513755259 TEL 5513755250 DATE, TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 02/20 15.09 91850488330985085 00 01 21 03 OK STANDARD ECM ~CQ)~W DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning Building Planning & Zoning Occupational License Community Redevelopment February 20,2001 Mr Joseph Addae-Mensa State ofFlonda Department of Commumty AffaIrs 2555 Shumard Oak Dnve Tallahassee, Flonda 32399-2100 Re Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DR! - Amendment No. 11 (Our Ref. No DRIA 00-002) Dear Mr Addae-Mensa, ThIs letter IS wntten to confirm a dISCUSSIOn we had last week regardIng Lot 34-C In Quantum Park. Lot 34-C IS a 6,59 acre parcel set aSIde for detentIon and Included In the open space calculatIons on the Quantum Park Master Plan. At the February 13, 2001 Planmng and Development Board meetIng, the Board voted to add a condItIon to the NOPC approval for Amendment No 11 whIch would desIgnate Lot 34-C as "IndustrIal" land use on the Master Plan. I IndIcated to you that our City Attorney, Jim Cherofs opInIOn was that thIS change should not be consIdered wIth thIS NOPC because It was not preVIously revIewed by all agencIes, IncludIng the CIty and It was not advertIsed. If thIS change was to be consIdered It would have to be submItted WIth a new NOPC You concurred WIth thIS OpInIOn. I would apprecIate your wntten confirmatIOn as to the content of the above referenced dISCUSSIon regardIng Lot 34-C In Quantum Park DR!. If you have any questIOns, please call me at 561-742-6262 SIncerely, dlA Jidav LUSla Galav, AICP PnncIpal Planner CC MIchael Rumpf, PlannIng and ZonIng DIrector Jim Cherof, City Attorney Roger Wilburn, DCA" S'\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park Amend. #ll\Quantum Park DRlA\DCA Lot 34C Let.doc America's Gateway to the Gulfstream 100 Easl Boynlon Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33~25-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259 Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD PO BOX310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION To Fax # Date From Re Pages Jim Snyder, Treasure Coast RPC 561-221-4067 February 20, 2001 Lusia Galav, AICP, Principal Planner Quantum Park DRI NOPC Amendment #11 2 Planning and Zoning Division City of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 742-6260 Fax: 742-6259 I -RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT i_ TIME 02/20/2001 15 07 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613756259 TEL 5613756260 DATE,TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 02/20 15 06 91551221406785085 00 00 55 02 Ok STANDARD ECM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning Building Planning & Zoning Occupational License Community Redevelopment February 20,2001 Mr James Snyder Treasure Coast RegIonal Planmng Council 301-E, Ocean Blvd. #300 Stuart, Flonda 34994 Re Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DR! - Amendment No. 11 (Our Ref. No DRIA 00-002) Dear Mr Snyder ThIS letter IS wntten to confirm a dISCUSSIon we had last week regardmg Lot 34-C m Quantum Park. Lot 34-C IS a 659 acre parcel set aSIde for detentIOn and mcluded m the open space calculatIOns on the Quantum Park Master Plan. At the February 13, 2001 Planmng and Development Board meetmg, the Board voted to add a condItIOn to the NOPC approval for Amendment No 11 WhICh would desIgnate Lot 34-C as "Industnal" land use on the Master Plan. I mdIcated to you that our City Attorney, Jim Cherofs opmIOn was that thIS change should not be consIdered wIth thIS NOPC because It was not preVIOusly reVIewed by all agencIes, mcludmg the CIty and It was not advertIsed, If thIS change was to be consIdered It would have to be submItted wIth a new NOPC You generally concurred With thIS opmIOn mdIcatmg that If the CIty acted on the change wIthout pnor reVIew the RPC could appeal the deCISIOn. Also, that the change would affect the detentIOn reqUIrement and may create addItional regIonal concerns You also suggested If Lot 34-C was desIgnated for mdustnalland use another lot would have to be set aSIde for detentIOn and that lot would have to be In an acceptable location. It was agreed that m thIS case further study IS warranted, I would appreCIate your wntten confirmatIOn as to the content of the above referenced dISCUSSIOn regardmg Lot 34-C m Quantum Park DRl If you have any questIOns, please call me at 561-742-6262 Smcerely, ~!A ~v LUSIa Galav, AICP PnncIpal Planner CC MIchael Rumpf, Planmng and Zonmg DIrector Jim Cherof, City Attorney America's Gateway to the Gulfstream 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX; (561) 375-6259 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Governor STEVEN M. SEIBERT Secretary February 2, 2001 Mr Michael Rumpf, Manager Planmng and Zomng Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re Quantum Park DRI DCA Project FIle No ADA-l 084-048 ReVIew of NotIficatIOn of Proposed Change Dear Mr Rumpf. The Department has completed Its reVIew of the notIce of proposed change (NOPC) to the Development Order (D 0 ) for the Quantum Park Development of RegIOnal Impact (DRI), located m the CIty of Boynton Beach. The NOPC was rendered by Mr Eugene Gerhca, the authorized agent for Quantum LImIted Partners, L C , the developer of the DRI, The apphcant IS requestmg that the D 0 be amended m order to 1 change the land use deSIgnatIOns for Lots 7 through 11 from Office/Industnal to Mixed Use and Lots 23 through 31 from Office to Mixed Use, 2. reVIse the D 0 language to estabhsh development thresholds for each land use approved wIthm the project that should not be exceeded wIthout further approval from the CIty of Boynton Beach, and 3 reVIse the Master SIte Development Plan to reflect the proposed land use modIficatIOns. The Department has detemuned that the proposed changes described above are presumed to create substantIal deViatIOns pursuant to SectIOns 380 06( 19)( e)3 & 5 c., F S The applicant has rebutted these presumptIOns by clear and convmcmg eVIdence through a traffic Impact analYSIS, Therefore, the Department raises no ObjectIOn to the NOPC However, the apphcant should reVIse the development mtensIty mformatIOn on the proposed Master SIte Development Plan to be conSIstent WIth the proposed reVIsed D 0 language. CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE 2796 Overseas Highway Suite 212 Marathon, FL 33050-2227 (305) 289-2402 ~- j ~~,-'-75J 2 5 5 5 S HUM A ROO A K B 0 U LEV A RD. TAL L A HAS SEE, F L J a ';9-A 3 2 3 9 9 2 1 0 0:' G-') . P h 0 n e 8 5 0 4 8 8 8 4 6 6/5 u n com 2 78 8 4 6 6 FAX 8 5 0 9 2 1 0 7 ai, i /~in com 2 9 1 0 7 8 1 , ~1.' U'i ' Internet address http //www dca state fl ~i>i' '. FEB ~ ! , i l '" ~ [d'" - v ,i EMERGENCY MANAGEMEN tiOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELd>MENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevar 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard ....J Tallahassee, FL 32399.2100 Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100 (850) 413-9969 .... (850l 488-7956 COMMUNITY PLANNING 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Fl 32399-2100 (850) 488-2356 Mr Michael Rumpf February 2, 2001 Page Two If you have any questIOns concernmg thIS matter, please contact me, or Joseph Addae- Mensa, Planner IV, at (850) 487-4545 Smcerely, ~I(/L Roger Wilburn Commumty Program AdmmIstrator Bureau of Local Plannmg R W /jam cc James Snyder, DR! Coordinator, Treasure Coast RegIOnal Plannmg CouncIl Eugene A. Gerhca, P .E., Mock, Roos & ASSOCiates, Inc - !~. treOlure co~t regional planniQg council January 31,2001 Mr Michael W Rumpf Planmng and Zomng DIrector CIty of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Flonda 33435 Subject: Quantum Park Development of Regional Impact Notification of Proposed Change Dear Mr Rumpf' In accordance with the requirements of SectIOn 380 06( 19), Flonda Statutes (F S ), we have reviewed the "Notification of a Proposed Change to a PrevIOusly Approved Development of RegIOnal Impact (DR!)" (NOPC) for the Quantum Park DRI dated December 19,2000 The NOPC proposes the following revisions to the master plan. 1) Lots 7,8,9,10, and 11 land use desIgnatIOn IS to be changed from office/industnal to mIxed use, whIch allows office, commercIal, and reSIdential uses. 2) Lots 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 31 land use designation IS to be changed from office to mixed use, WhICh allows office, commercIal, and reSIdential uses. The applicant proposes to decrease office and mdustnal square footage to allow additional commercial square footage and dwelling umts The proposed changes are presumed to create a substantial deviation pursuant to Section 38006(19)(e)3 and 38006(19)(e)5.c, Florida Statutes. CouncIl has revIewed the mformation and determmed that the proposed changes will not create any additional regional impacts, ~ Council recognizes and apprecIates the applicant's efforts to create a good mIX of land uses and provide for a more sustainable form of development for a portion of the proJect. Council would be interested in reVIewing the proposed site plan and discussing possible revisions that would further the goals and polICIes of Council's Strategic Regional Policy Plan. r-------___ /~ ill ~~ f' " Vi! ~ fnl In;1 ---'I~I ".; J:"FR 2 ! I.' '-- - L:Ji I J I f i 301 east ocean boulevard suite 300 stuart, florida 34994 phone (561) 221-4060 sc 269-4060 fax (561) 221-4067 Mr Michael W Rumpf January 31, 2001 Page 2. Please call If you have any questions. Sincerely, J=T ~Yder DRI Coordinator cc Roger Wilburn, FDCA Eugene Gerlica, Applicant CJ\OOL D1S ~C~} J':.I'TJR "- 'At BEACH COU"" THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA FACILITIES PLANNING 3320 FOREST HILL BOULEVARD, C-331 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33406-5813 (561) 434-8020 FAX (561) 434-8187 DR. H. BENJAMIN MARLIN SUPERINTEN>ENT January 29 2001 Michael W Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning Department of Development City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd - POBox 310 Boynton Beach FL 33425-0310 RE Quantum Park - DRIA 00-002/MPMD 00-007 Notice of Proposed Change - Master Plan Amendment #11 - Quantum Park Dear Mr Rumpf The School District staff has evaluated the impacts of the proposed amendment to the Development Order Master Plan on the school system The School District, Palm Beach County and local governments, including Boynton Beach, have adopted public school concurrency for the coordinated planning of schools to meet student growth from residential development. Concurrency will be implemented upon the final local government adopting its Public School Facility Element and the amendment to the Capital Improvement Element and adopting its implementing ordinance A concurrency determination shall not be required at this time Through concurrency, the county will be geographically divided into Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) for better planning of school utilization This proposed development in located in CSA 17 The schools serving that portion of CSA 17 and adjacent CSA's 14,15,18 and 19, may be subject to annual adjustments of boundaries to accommodate new schools equalize utilization and provide capacity for the new student growth The proposed addition of 500 multi-family units to the Quantum Park DRI located at Miner Road between the Boynton Canal west of 1-95 is in Concurrency Service Area (CSA) 17 and may generate up to 30 elementary, 80 middle and 80 high school students Upon build-out, the District anticipates there will be capacity in CSA 17 and adjacent CSA's to accommodate the student growth from this development. Please provide the phasing for the development so that we may better plan for the students through build-out. Additionally, the School District requests that the City review the Plan for the inclusion of the following.. j;, ~ 'J -~ r~~~ == 2 An Equal Opportunity Employer , ~ If this site plan is to be a gated community, please provide a bus stop/turnaround and shelter in front of the gate This will be shown on the Plan as a turnaround designed to accommodate a school bus at a minimum radius of 55' Additionally, a bus shelter should be provided at the bus pick-up point. The District requests, as a condition of approval the provision of a bus turnaround and shelter at the gate concurrent with the first C 0 ~ The property owner shall post a notice of annual boundary school assignments for students from this development. The District will provide an 11" X 17" sign to be posted in a clear and visible location in all sales offices and models with the following "NOTICE TO HOME BUYERSITENANTS" School age children may not be assigned to the public school closest to their residences School Board policies regarding overcrowding or other boundary policy decisions affect school boundaries Please contact the Palm Beach County School District Boundary Office at (561) 434-8100 for the most current school assignment(s) If there are any questions, please call me at your convenience at (561) 434-8028 Si)' erely, / 7. J " ~/J~jt~ )I;~)/cd ~ <J~nne Mills, AICP / Senior Planner, Concurrency J' cc Angela Usher, Manager Intergovernmental Relations H:\DA TA \CONCRNC2\REGREV\DRC\LETTERS\WPB\ 12901 1-30-2001 12 39PM F~ON PLANNING AND REAL ES 561 434 8187 P 1 The School District of Palm Beach County Department of Planning & Real Estate 3320 Forest Hill Boulevard - C331 West Palm Beach, Fl33406 I Phone: (561) 434-8020 T r Fax: (.561) 434-8187 Jl FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL Nil of Pagcs sent '(including Cova- PQgc) :3 FROM M \ Cf{ ~ Eo L vJ (~j.l (v'" PF j) lRE'-C: To~ pLA foJ tv' "16 .. Z oN{N6 5<; (-742-b25.9 / DATE- i/30/0( .:r e~ ~ f.!e tv\. f LLS / S ~ fLA"N"~~! C' 0 N CO~ .~.eNo/ P&RE TO FAX# Name Titl~ Dept COMMENTS cc "':\0" T... WI'';I\OOC\llJSrn.o!e.F'''x. 1-30-2001 12 40Pt1 FRO~1 PLA!\:N I \IG AND REAL ES 561 434 81 87 F 2 t' ........c..HOOL O/.s -,I . :.;, tl~ ~. ~ ~ '~.. . -I H~ o;!j, ~;a~n,J 2- ~ BEACH COtJ,,!/ TfiE SCfiOOl. DlS1RlCT OF PAi.M BeACH COUNTY. FLORIDA FACIlITIES PLANNING 3320 FOAEST t1llL BOULEVARD, C-331 W~I PAlJA BEAO!; Fl3340605813 (561) ~ FAX (581) 4340S187 OFt H. BENJAMIN MAAlIN SUPlI\IlImIIEH1' January 29 2001 Michael W Rumpf DIrector of Planmng and Zoning Department of Development City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. - POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE Quantum Park - DRIA 00-o02lMPMD 00.007 Notice of Proposed Change ~ Master Plan Amendment #11 - Quantum Park Dear Mr Rumpf The Schoo, District staff has evaluated the Impacts of the proposed amendment to the Development Order Master Plan on the school system The School District, Palm Beach County and local governments including Boynton Beach, have adopted public school concurrency for the coordinated planning of schools to meet student growth from residential development. Concurrency wili be implemented up~ the final local government adopting its Public School Facility Element ard the ilmendme~t to the Capital Improvement Element and adopting Its Implementing ordinance A concurrency determination shall not be required at this time. Through concurrency the county will be geographically divided into Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) for better planning of school utilization This proposed development in located in CSA 17 The schools serving that portion of CSA 17 and adjacent CSA's 14.1518 filnd 19 may be subject to annual adjustments of boundaries to accomModate new schools eqlialize utilization and crevloe capacity for the new student growth. The p~oposed addition of 500 multi-family Units to the Quantum Park DRI located at Miner Road between the Boynton Canal. west of 1-95, 1$ in Concurrer.cy Service Area (CSA) 17 and may generate .Jp to 30 elemental"'l 80 middle and 80 high scrool students Upon build.out. the District anticipates there will be capacity in CSA 17 and adjacent CSA s to accommodate the student growth from this development. Please provide the phaSing for the development so that 'Ne may better plan for the students through build-out. Additionally the School District requests that the City revIew the Plan for the lnelUSlon of the following provisions: 1-30-2001 12 40PM FRm-1 PLAN~JING At'-JD REAL ES 561 434 8 87 P 3 <II! y If this site plan is to be a gated communtty please provide a bus stop1tumaround and shelter in front of the gate. This will be shown on the Plan as a turnarotmd designed to accommodate a senool bus at a minimum radius of 55' Additionally, a bus shelter should be provided at the bus pick-up pomt. The District requests. as a condition .of approval, the provision of a bus turnaround and shelter at the gate concurrent with the first C 0 y The p~operty owner shall post a notice of annl-al boundary school assignments for students from this development. The District Will provide an 11" X 17" sign to be posted in a clear and visible location in all sales offices and models with the following. NOTICE TO HOME BUYERSiTENANTS" School age children may not be assigned to the public school closest, to their residences. School Board policies regarding overcrowding or other boundary policy decisions affect school boundaries. Please contact the Palm Beach County School District Boundal)l Office at (561) 434-8100 for the most current school assignment(s) If there are any questions. please call me at your convenience at (561) 434-8028 ~i~erely, / '. ) 7/7)~ .. '/7l,,~ //I//I{d~: I ~~nne Mills AICP I Senior Planner Concurrency / cc Angela Usher, Manager Intergovernmental Relations H '\D" T A \CONCRNC2\R~GREV'DRC\I.ETIeRS\Wpe\12~ 1 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning Building Planning & Zoning Occupational License Community Redevelopment January 26,2001 Mr James Snyder Treasure Coast RegIOnal Planmng CouncIl 301-E. Ocean Blvd. #300 Stuart, Flonda 34994 Re' Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DRI - Amendment No. 11 (Our Ref. No DRIA 00-002) Dear Mr Snyder Please be advIsed that m accordance wIth Chapter 38006 F S the CIty of Boynton Beach has scheduled a Pubhc Heanng regardmg the above referenced NotIce of Proposed Change for Tuesday, March 6, 2001 at 7'00 PM. The Pubhc Heanng WIll be held m the CIty CommISSIon Chambers located at 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Flonda. Smcerely, 7L-cJ::=- Michael Rumpf Planmng & Zorung DIrector MR CC Eugene A. Gerhca, P.E Quantum Group of CompanIes J:ISHRDATAIPlanningISHAREDlWP\PROJECfS\Quantum Park Amend #11\Quantum Park DRIA\Treasure Coast Regional Planningl Council.doc America's Gateway to the Gulfstream 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning Building Planning & Zoning Occupational License Community Redevelopment January 26,2001 Mr Bob Cambnc Growth Management Adrrllmstrator State of Flonda Department ofCommumty AffaIrs DIVISIon of CommunIty Planmng 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Re Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DRI - Amendment No. 11 (Our Ref. No DRIA 00-002) Dear Mr Cambnc Please be advIsed that m accordance wIth Chapter 380 06 F S the CIty of Boynton Beach has scheduled a Pubhc Heanng regardmg the above referenced Notice of Proposed Change for Tuesday, March 6,2001 at 7'00 PM. The Pubhc Heanng will be held m the CIty CommISSIon Chambers located at 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Flonda, Smcerely, -x-dz Michael Rumpf Planmng & Zomng DIrector MR CC Eugene A. Gerhca, P .E. Quantum Group of CompanIes J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\V,'P\PROIECTS\Quantum Park Amend. #ll\Quantum Park DRIA\Treasure Coast Regional Planningl Counci1.doc America's Gateway to the Gulfstream 100 Ea.t Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FA.."\(: (561) 375-6259 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning Building Planning & Zoning Occupational License Community Redevelopment January 26,2001 Mr Thomas A. McGIlhcuddy MFT Development, Inc , a Flonda CorporatIon 2500 Quantum Lakes Dnve Ste # 101 Boynton Beach, FI. 33426 Re Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DR! - Amendment No. 11 (Our Ref. No DRIA 00-002) Dear Mr McGIlhcuddy' Please be advIsed that m accordance wIth Chapter 38006 F.S the CIty of Boynton Beach has scheduled a Pubhc Heanng regardmg the above referenced NotIce of Proposed Change for Tuesday, March 6,2001 at 7'00 PM. The Pubhc Heanng WIll be held m the CIty ComrmsslOn Chambers located at 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Flonda. Smcerely, ?L~ Michael Rumpf Planrung & Zomng DIrector MR CC Eugene A, Gerhca, P ,E, Quantum Group of CompanIes J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park Amend #ll\Quantum Park DR.lA\Treasure Coast Regional Planningl Council doc America's Gateway to tlte Gulfstream 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-03]0 Phone: (56]) 375-6260 FAX: (56]) 375-6259 L 0 H E_N I~ 0 J{ K I ~ ~ L H t ~ t K W E I r", B ERG E R & W 0 L tv, c R ATTORNEYS AT LAW FReD C. COHEN, P.A.... GReGORy R. COHiON BiORNARO A. CONKO. OAII1D B. NORRIS, P.A. PETER R. RAY ERIC M. SAUERBERG" KENNeTHJ.SCHERE~,P~. KYLEA. SIL~RMAN. JAUES S. TELEPMANu. ROSefITM. V'd:INBERGER,P.A. BRENTG.INOLMER, P.A. OF COUNSEL. ~ ~ ~ u r-n l r \i' . I ~ ! i i I .1 , U Ii .~ LJ .~ RICHAIIO s. RACHLIN, P~. ill 2 RlCHAItD $. AACHlI~ ~ CI-flISTOPHeRW. KAMMERER PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT "B08Ill :ertified Civil Trial At\o/Tley '01 Counael '"'lloeIll CeI1ifiOd Raa, Eal8le ""1loard CMilied Busi~. UigIlIIon January 23,2001 Lusia Galav, Principal Planner City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 via facsimile 561.742-6259 RE. Quantum Park - NOpe #11 Dear Ms. Galav' As you know, this firm represents the Quantum Group of Companies. I write you this letter with respect to NOpe #11 and specifically with respect to the Planning and Zoning DiviBion's comments with regard thereto Our responses to such comments are as follows. PUBLIC WORKS (General) - Comment: None PUBLIC WORKS (Traffic) - Comment: see attached Memorandum dated January 16, 2001 (Exhibit "A") Response As stated, Quantum Park is "vestedU with a certain numtler of trips The required analysis, as such, should only revolve around whether the proposal will exceed such trips As such, the suggested request is not warranted and should be deleted SeE! also additional comments in the attached letter dated January 22,2001 from Kahart Pinder UTiliTIES - 2.1 Comment: On the surface, the request to change the zoning on Lots" through 11 and Lots 23 through 31 (a total of 14 lots) from Office & Industrial to Mixed Use, seems simple enough. Response See response in Exhibit A attached hereto A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 712 u. S. HIGHWAY ONE. SUITE 400. P.O. BOX lS146 . NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33408-7146 THEPHONE: (561) 844-3600 . FACSIMILE: (561) 842-4104 Jan-Z3-01 1Z 50pm From-COHEN NORRIS SCHERER WEINBERGER 56184Z4104 1-348 P 03/09 F-9Z8 2.2 Comment: However, with the original DRI for the total park designed for Commercial Industrial, Office, or a combination of Office and Industrial, and/or Office, Industrial and Commercial' both the water and wastewater systems support these type of anticipated uses wer e designed and constructed for those anticipated uses. Four (4) life stations were configured to handle the wastewater generation anticipated on the 550 acre park. Response See response in Exhibit A attached hereto 2.3 Comment: Recently, the City allowed the conversion of three (3) lots (#59 through 61) from Office & Industrial to Mixed Use, which included some 272 apartment units, some 228 apartment units await incorporation into Lots 62 through 67 Now, with the anticipated addition I,f approximately 500 apartment units on the 14 lots noted above, the existing utility support facilities could be taxed to their limits Response' See response in Exhibit A attached hereto 2.4 Comment: A prOViso needs to be incorporated into each lot(s) approval process that the design engineering consultants shall demonstrate that sufficient utility system(s) cap;~city is available to support the proposed use, or they will provide the necessary upgrade(s) to allow tor the proposed use Failure to do so could result in insufficient utility support to this park, affecting other current (existing) users. Response. See response in Exhibit A attached hereto FIRE. No comment POLICE. No comment ENGINEERING DIVISION No comment BUILDING DIVISION 3 Comment: Add to the site plan drawing all eXisting easements that are shown on the survey Also, add all proposed easements. The location, type and size of the easements shall be shown and identified on the site plan Where applicable, amend the plans so that structures do not encroach into an easement. Response See responses in Exhibit A attached hereto and letter fmm Winston Lee dated January 22, 2001 attached hereto 4 Comment: At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed City unity of title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as one lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions of each property that is being unified is required to be submitted to process the form The property owner that is identified on each deed shall match. A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 712 U. S. HICHWAY ONE. SUITE 400. P.O. BOX 13146. NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33408-7146 TELEPHONE: (561) M4-3600 . FACSIMilE: (561) 8424104 Jan-23-01 12 50pm From-COHEN NORRIS SCHERER WEINBERGER 5618424104 T-348 P 04/09 F-928 Response See responses In Exhibit A attached hereto and letter from Winston Lee dated January 22, 2001 5 Comment: At time of permit review, submit sIgned and sealed workinu drawings of the proposed construction Response. See responses in Exhibit A attached hereto and letter from Winston Lee dated January 22, 2001 attached hereto 6 Comment: At time of permit review, submit a copy of the recorded resolution that verifies the abandonment of the alley. right-of-way or easement. Response See responses in Exhibit A attached hereto and letter from Winston Lee dated January 22, 2001 attached hereto 7 Comment: At time of permit review. submit for review an addressing plan for the project. Response. See responses in Exhibit A attached hereto and letter from Winston Lee dated January 22, 2001 attached hereto 8 Comment: Add to all plan view draWings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. Response. See responses in Exhibit A attached hereto and letter from Winston Lee dated January 22. 2001 attached hereto 9 Comment: At time of permit of review, provIde a copy of a City-approved waiver of plat showing approval for subdividing the property The waiver shall describe each lot, parcel or tract of land At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the record(~d deed for each lot. parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review Response: See responses in Exhibit A attached hereto and letter from Winston Lee dated January 22, 2001 attached hereto PARKS AND RECREATION 10 Comment: As a condition of issuance of a land development ordm for residential planned unit developments, the developer shall dedicate land, pay a fee in lieu theref)f, or both, at the option of the City, for park or recreational purposes and according to the standards and formula in Chapter 1, Article V in the Land Development Code The total recreation dedication credit will be calculated as follows. A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 712 U S. HIGHWAY ONE . SUITE 400. PO BOX 13146. NORTH PALM BEACH, fLORIDA33408-7146 1eLEPHONE: (561) 844-3600 . FACSIMILE. (561) 842-4104 Jan-Z3-01 lZ 51pm From-COHEN NORRIS SCHERER WEINBERGER 56184Z4104 T-348 P 05/09 F-9Z8 1000 dux 015 acres = 15 acres % credit may be given against the requirement of land dedication or payment fees % private recreation credit will be calculated as follows 15 acres /2 =: 75 acres The Developer may want to consider dedicatlon of the land, or a combination of dedication and fee Response. The issue of the recreation dedication requirement has been preViously discussed and dealt with by the City Commission with respect to the Grotto Bay site plan approval for Quantum Park & Village, LLC Based upon the discussions and determinations Ht that time, our response to this comment is in several parts as follows A. At least 272 units (the number of units in the Grotto Bay project) were determined to be exempt from this requirement by the City Commission. Therefore, at the most, the units in this comment should be reduced to 728. B The discussion and expression of intent by the City Commission was that Quantum Park in general should be exempt from the recreation dedication credit. The discussion by the Commission was that Quantum Park had provided more in the form of recreation and other benefits to the City to satisfy any potential recreation dedication requirement and therefore, no further requirement should be requested with respect thereto C Even if the recreation dedication applies, Quantum Park should be entitled to the credit for the natural resource preservation as provided for in the Code, which credit, based upon the natural resources provided in Quantum Park would totally exceed any requirement as discussed in this comment, as such credit would be calculated as one quarter of the acres qualifying in Quantum Park in general 11 Comment: If the property is not required to be platted, the recreation dedication fee will be due prior to the building permit being issued Response We would make the same arguments as set forth in #10 above In addition, the Code clearly provides that any recreation dedication fee is to be paid at the time of platting and does not provide for any other time frame Based upon that clear provision, ifthe requirement remains at all, it should only be required to be paid at the time any plat is recorded 12. Comment: Provide to the Parks Division at the close of the construction contract as-built plans showing locations of irrigation lines in the rights-of-ways and medians Response We cannot find any basis in the Code or otherwise to justify any such requirement. A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 712 U S HIGHWAY ONE. SUITE 400 . P.O BOX 13146 . NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33408-7146 TElEPI-lONE; (561) 844-3600. FACSIMILE: (S61) 842-4104 Jan-23-o1 12 53pm From-COHEN NORR I S SCHERER WE I NBERGER 5618424104 T-348 P 06/09 F-928 13 Comment: In order to eam Y2 recreation credit, the developer needs to provide a minimum of 5 of the local park basic requirements listed belowl or a combination of such, and other recreational improvements that will meet recreation park needs of future residents of the area a) b) c) d) e) f) g) Children's Play Apparatus Area Landscape Park-Like and Quiet Areas Family Picnic Areas Game Court Areas Turf Playfield Swimming Pool & Lawn Areas Recreation Center Building .~ Response We would state the same argument as stated in paragraph #10 above FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST - Comment: None PLANNING AND ZONING 14 Comment: The Notice of Proposed Change (NOpe) document which accompanies this Master Plan Revision has errors in the Land Use Acreage Table on page 3 The Offi(~lIndustrial (01) category shows existing acreage as 84.35 - it should be 8774 The OfficellndustriallCommercial (OIC) category shows proposed and existing acreage as 26 33 - it should be 22.94 Please correct and resubmit table Response See response in Exhibit A attached hereto 15 Comment: Triangle notes 1 - 3 have been removed from the Mastnr Plan Note 1 corresponds to Lot 91, 47A and 47B Note 2 corresponds to Lot 658 and Note 3 corresponds to Lot 17 Provide written explanation for this revision. Response. See response in Exhibit A attached hereto 16 Comment: Master Plan shows a new note which provides for the Re~;idential dwelling unit conversion to Industrial use. The second such note refers to a conversion of OnE} Residential unit to 725 square feet of Industrial The NOpe indicates this as Office use not Industrial Provide justification for these conversion formulas which were not included in the last NOpe Response See response in attached letter dated January 231 2001 from Kahart Pinder 17 Comment: Approval of the Master Plan is contingent upon a finding of no substantial deviation by the City This is based on the following sections of the Florida Statue~.. a) Chapter 38006 (19(b) 9 An increase in the number of dwelling units by five (5) percent or 50 units, whichever is greater A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 712 U S. HIGHWAY ONE. sum: 400. P.O. BOX 13146 . NOI{TH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33408-7146 TELEPHONE. (561) 844-3600 . FACSIMILE: (S61) 842-4104 Jan-23-01 12 53pm From-COHEN NORRIS SCHERER WEINBERGER 5618424104 T-348 P 07/09 F-928 b) Chapter 38006 (19)(e) 5 c. Not withstanding any provision of paragraph (b) to the contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous Increases and decreases of at least two of the uses within an authorized multi-use development of regional impact which was ori!linally approved with more than three uses specified in 3800651 (3)(c), (d), (f) and (g) and residentl.21 use The application as presented is presumed to be a substantial deviation by-the City This presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence. The applicant must pmvide additional information before a determination of no substantial deviation is made The additional information includes a) Provide a reVised traffic analysis based on items discussed in comments #1 and #18 b) Demonstrate how the proposed project is consistent with the local comprehensive plan c) Provide an updated projection of water and sewer demands. Response With respect to (a) This has now been provided (see #1 and #18) With respect to b) see response in attached letter from Winston Lee dated January 22, 2001 With respect to c) see Exhibit A attached hereto 18 Comment: The traffic analysis for NOPC #1 dated 12/18/00 is flawed The following inconsistencies were found a) Office square footage shown in the traffic analysis 725,850 is not comiistent with what is shown as a note on the Master Plan, 888,850 Please clarify b) The total square footage in the traffic analysis equals 3,323,718 square feet. The total generated from the amounts shown in the notes is 3,514,618 Please clarify c) A different A.M and P.M. Peak Trip Generation Rate is being used for the Office and convenience store category than was used for Amendment #10 Refer to Pinder Troutman letters dated 2/17/00, 2/28/00 and 12/18/00 Please clarify Response. See response in attached letter dated January 22,2001 from Kahart Pinder 19 Comment: Under the condition of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development Order and Chapter 3, Article IV of the Land Development Regulations, a traffic an~"ysis is required and was submitted for this Master Plan Approval This traffic analysis will be reviewed by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division In lieu of an independent traffic consultant, the City's Public Works Department staff will review the traffic study The cost of the review fee is based on hourly salanes plus 35% for fringe benefits. Response See response in Exhibit A attached hereto A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 712 U. S. HICHWAY ONE. sum: 400 . P.O. BOX 13146 . NORTH PAl.M BEACH, FLORIDA 33408-7146 TELEPHONE: (561) 844-3600 . FACSIMILE: (561) 8424104 Ja.n-2S-01 12 54pm From-COHEN NORRI S SCHERER WE INBERGER 5618424104 T-S48 P 08/09 F-928 20 Comment: This NOPClMaster Plan submittal did not include a preliminary site plan or justification for the requested change Provide a wntten justification for the proposed change Justification and data shall support elimination of the land available for industrial uses based on Clty- Widened needs and supply (update Land Use Distribution and needs and supply data within Comprehensive Plan), Document fiscal impact of the increase in residential land uses, and be based on Market data that favors the proposed uses over the currently designah3d land uses Response We cannot find any basis In the Code or the Florida Statutes for such a requirement. Absent such a requirement being contained in the Code or in the Florida Statutes, the requirement is inappropriate In addition, see responses in Exhibit A and in letter from Winston Lee 21 Comment: Indicate the target market for the residential units Response. See response in Exhibit A attached hereto 22 Comment: In accordance with Chapter 2, Section 7, a Master Site Plan will be required for this mixed use pod A mixed use pod, when complete, will have all following uses a) Multi-family reSidential b) Commercial/retail c) Office/professional Response. See response in letter from Winston Lee dated January 2~~, 2001 23 Comment: Staff recommends that the NOPC/Master Plan approval include a condition which requires a minimum of 20 acres of land designated as mixed use be developed with the full mix of commercial/retail/and office before the additional 500 units of residential may be constructed. Response We would make the same responses set forth in paragraph #20 above In addition, I find no basis for any municipality being able to dictate the timing of the particular development of a project. Such a requirement would be unprecedented and without justification. As it has been clearly stated to City staff and the City Commission, the development of this project and Quantum Park in general is and will continue to be dictated by the market. To reqUire anything else would essentially jeopardize the continued and successful development of Quantum Park. I do not believe the City Commission has expressed any desire to get involved in such management or ownership decision making 24 Comment: Approval of the Master Plan is contingent upon the applicant filing for and receiving approval for a text amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to permit residential use in the Industrial land use category Response. Again, this matter has been previously discussed and dealt with by the City Commission as set forth in Ordinance 00-002. If you recall, City staff raised this issue at that time, which was totally and absolutely rejected by the City Commission, the decision being that if staff felt ^ PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 712 U s. HIGHWAY ONE. SUITE 400 . P.O. aox 13146. NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33408-7146 TELEPHONE: (561) 844-3600 . FACSIMILE: (561) 842-4104 Jan-23-01 12 54pm From-COHEN NORRIS SCHERER WEINBERGER 5618424104 T-348 P 09/09 F-928 the comprehensive plan wording needed to be clarified, then the City staff should take it upon itself to process such clarification, but should not involve or delay any development in the meantime In addition, see response in Winston Lee letter dated January 22, 2001 .~ Very truly yours, cc: A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 712 U S. HIGHWAY ONE. SUITE 400 . POBOX 13146. NOR'TH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33408.7146 TELEPHONE. (.561) 844-3600. FACSIMILE: (561) 842-4104 .~~ QUAN-. Utv\ ..-,1lJii;- G R 0 U P 0 F C 0 ,\1 PAN I E 5 EXHffiIT A .~ January 22,2001 Mr Michael W Rumpf CIty of Boynton Beach Department of Development Planmng & Zomng DIvIsIOn 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425 RE. Quantum Park - Amendment # 11 Dear Mr Rumpf I have addressed each mdlvldual comment as follows. PUBLIC WORKS - General Comment: None PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic 1 Comment: See attached memorandum dated January 16,2001 (Exhibit A) UTILITIES 2.1 Comment: On the surface, thelT request to change the zomng on Lots 7 through 11, and Lots 23 through 31 (a total of 14 lots) from Office & Industnal to Mixed Use, seems sImple enough. Response Comment Noted - Comment should be deleted. 2 2 Comment: However, WIth the ongmal DR! for the total park designed for Commercial, Industnal, Office, or a combmatIOn of Office and Industnal, and/or Office, IndustrIal and CommercIal, both the water and wastewater systems support these type of antICIpated uses were desIgned and constructed for those anticipated uses. Four (4) lIfe stations were configured to handle the wastewater generatIon antIcIpated on the 550 acre park. Response: Comment Noted - Comment should be deleted 2500 Quantum lakes Drive, SUite 101 Boynton Beach, Fl 33426 (5611740-2447 Fax (5611740-2429 e-mail: quantgrp@qgc.cc 23 Comment: Recently, the CIty allowed the converSIOn of three (3) lots (#59 through 61) from Office & IndustrIal to MIxed Use, WhICh mcluded some 272 apartment umts, some 228 apartment umts awaIt mcorporatIon mto Lots 62 through 67 Now, WIth the antICIpated addItion of approXImately 500 apartment umts on the 14 lots noted above, the eXlstmg utility support faCIlities could be taxed to theIr lImIts. ~ - Response: Comment Noted - Comment should be deleted 24 Comment: A proVISIOn needs to be mcorporated mto each lot(s) approval process that the deSIgn engmeenng consultants shall demonstrate that sufficIent utilIty system(s) capaCIty IS available to support the proposed use, or they WIll provIde the necessary upgrade(s) to allow for the proposed use Failure to do so could result m msufficIent utilIty support to thIS park, affectmg other current (exIstmg) users. Response. This comment is unnecessary, we object to its' inclusion in the staff comments and request it he deleted The development is already conditioned to upgrade the ltft station pumps and controls as development requires. The determination of the adequacy of the public infrastructure is a function of the design development and permitting of a specific project on any lot within Quantum Park, not just the lots that are the subject of this amendment, This application is for a land use change for particular lots within the development FIRE Comment: None POLICE Comment: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comment: None BUILDING DIVISION 3 Comment: Add to the SIte plan draWIng all eXIstmg easements that are shown on the survey Also, add all proposed easements. The locatIOn, type and SIze of the easements shall be shown and IdentIfied on the Site plan. Where apphcable~ amend the plans so that structures do not encroach mto an easement. Response: This comment and the remaining building department comments appear to be directed to a different project. The subject of this NOPC is a master plan land use designation change on 14 lots. Submitted in support of the proposed change is a revised master plan, a site plan was not submitted. A site plan is not proposed at this time and is not required to request or approve the proposed change. Easements are not shown on the current master plan and are not a required element of the master plan. 4 Comment: At time of permIt reVIew, provIde a completed and executed CIty uruty of tItle form_ The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combmed as one lot. A copy of the recorded deed wIth legal descnptIOns of each property that IS bemg umfied IS requIred to be submItted to process the form. The property owner that IS IdentIfied on each deed shall match. .~ Response Unification of lots is not proposed. This comment should be deleted. 5 Comment: At tIme of permIt reVIew, submIt SIgned and sealed workmg draWings of the proposed constructIOn. Response ThiS comment is not applicable and should be deleted. 6 Comment: At time of permIt reVIew, submIt a copy of the recorded resolutIOn that verIfies the abandonment of the alley, nght-of-way or easement. Response: This comment is not applicable and should be deleted. 7 Comment: At tIme of permIt reVIew, submIt for reVIew an addressmg plan for the project. Response An addressing plan currently exists for this project. This comment is not applicable and should be deleted. 8 Comment: Add to all plan view drawmgs of the SIte a labeled symbol that represents the location and pen meter of the lImIts of construction proposed With the subject request. Response The subject of this comment is indefinable. This comment is not applicable and should be deleted. 9 Comment: At time of permIt of reVIew, proVIde a copy of a City-approved waIver of plat showmg approval for subdIvIdmg the propert}' The waIver shall describe each lot, parcel or tract of land. At tIme of permIt reView, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes of settmg up property and ownershIp In the CIty computer, proVIde a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permIt reVIew Response A subdivision of property is not proposed within the application of the NOPe. This comment is not applicable and should be deleted. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comment: None PLANNING AND ZONING 14 Comment: The Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) document WhICh accompames thIS Master Plan ReVISIOn has errors In the Land Use Acreage Table on page 3 The Office/Industnal (01) category shows eXlstmg acreage as 8435 - It should be 8774 The OfficelIndustnal/Commerclal (OIC) category shows proposed and eXIstmg acreage as 26 33 - It should be 22 94 Please correct and resubmit table Response: The table has been corrected A copy or the cd1-rected ta/;Jle is attached 15 Comment: Tnangle notes 1 - 3 have been removed from the Master Plan. Note 1 corresponds to Lot 91, 47A and 47B Note 2 corresponds to Lot 65B and Note 3 corresponds to Lot 17 Provide wntten explanatIOn for thIs reVlSlon, Response: The triangles noting the location on the drawing of the revisions to the Amended Master Plan approved as Amendment No. 10 have been removed The drawing prepared as the Amended Master Plan for Amendment Number 11 has incorporated the revisions and has been assigned a new drawing reference. Revisions to this new drawing will be noted with triangles as the submitted plan is revised throughout the approval process for amendment number 11 16 Comment: Master Plan shows a new note which provides for the ResidentIal dwelling urnt converSiOn to Industnal use. The second such note refers to a converSIOn of one ResidentIal umt to 725 square feet of lndustnal. The NOPC mdlcates thIs as Office use not Industnal. Provide JustIficatIOn for these converSIOn formulas which were not mcluded m the last NOPC Response: The Master Plan has been revised to correct the equivalency formulas relative to the residential generation. Refer to the supplemental traffic statements and calculations provide by Pinder Troutman, inc., dated January 22; 200I 17 Comment: Approval of the Master Plan IS contmgent upon a findmg of no substantIal deViation by the City ThIS is based cOn the followmg sections of the Flonda Statues a) Chapter 380 06 (19(b) 9 An mcrease m the number of dwellmg umts by five (5) percent or 50 umts~ wluchever IS greater. b) Chapter 380 06 (19 X e) 5 c Not WIthstandmg any proVISion of paragraph (b) to the contrary, a proposed change conslstmg of Simultaneous mcreases and decreases of at least two of the uses WIthm an authonzed multI-use development of regIOnal Impact which was ongmally approved With more than three uses speCified m 3800651 (3)(c), (d), (f) and (g) and reSidentIal use Response: Comment Noted 17 1 Comment: The applIcatIOn as presented IS presumed to be a substantial deViatIOn by the City ThiS presumptIOn may be rebutted by clear and convmcmg evidence. The applIcant must proVide additIonal mformatIOn before a determmatIOn of no substantIal deviatIOn IS made The additIOnal mformatIOn mcludes a) ProVide a reVised traffic analYSIS based on Items diSCUSsed In comments # 1 and # 18 b) Demonstrate how the proposed project IS consIstent With the local comprehenSIve plan. c) ProvIde an updated projectIOn of water and sewer demands. Response: Reference the Pinder Troutman letter, dated January 22, 2001 and Winston Lees & Associates letter dated January 22, 2001 UplJated water_and wastewater demands will be provided upon submittal of a residential site plan for the area subject to the proposed change in DRlland use. This area may still be developedas office or industrial uses consistent with the current master plan. 18 Comment: The traffic analysIs for NOPC #1 dated 12/18/00 IS flawed, The followmg .inconSIstencieS were found. a) Office square footage shown m the traffic analysIs 725,850 IS not consIstent WIth what IS shown as a note on the Master Plan, 888,850 Please clanfy b} The total square footage In the traffic analysIs equals 3,323,718 square feet. The total generated from the amounts shown m the notes is 3,514,618 Please clanfy c) A dIfferent A.M, and P,M, Peak Tnp GeneratIon Rate IS bemg used for the Office and convemence store category than was used for Amendment # 1 0 Refer to Pmder Troutman letters dated 2/17/00, 2/28/00 and 12/18/00 Please clanfy Response: Reference the Pinder Troutman letter dated January 22, 2001 19 Comment: Under the condItion of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development Order and Chapter 3, ArtIcle IV of the Land Development RegulatIOns, a traffic analYSIS IS reqUITed and was submItted for thIS Master Plan Approval. ThIS traffic analYSIS will be revIewed by the Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISIon. In heu of an mdependent traffic consultant, the City'S PublIc Works Department staff will reVIew the traffic study The cost of the reVIew fee IS based on hourly salanes plus 35% for fnnge benefits, Response: The requirement for the traffic analysis and the independent review for the project were satisfied by the city commission approval of Amendment Number 10 The comments and recommendations presented by the Public Works Director simply do not apply The trajjic generated by this project is within the threshold established as part of the original and subsequent approvals., The thresholds have been established according to the submittal of acceptable traffic analysis based upon acceptable standards and reviews by various agencies. The traffic generated by the development intensities proposed as presented are within the thresholds of subsequent approvals, either as approved originally, approved by amendment 10 (the addition of 500 residential units) or as demonstrated by the traffic analysis submitted in evidence with the proposed amendment. The public works department comments and recommendations relative to trajjic issues are not the responsibility of the applicant at this time. The analysis recommendations were the responsibility of the previous developer and as statedIabove were addressed and the development was approved. The development is now vested jar the development intensities subsequently approved. The continued monitoring of existing traffic and the LOS categorization and remedy of d~ficiencies beyond the existing conditions of the development order are not the applicants'responsibility .~ The eight recommendations are addressed as follows 1 Palm Beach County currently is performing this duty 2 Palm Beach County currently is performing this duty 3 This recommendation is not the applicants responsibility 4 The traffic analysis as submitted is exactly the traffic generation anticipated at the build out of Quantum Park, The focus of the analysis is to compare the proposed development intensities with the previously approved development intensities. The analysis demonstrates the proposed intensities do not exceed the previously approved intensities. 5. This recommendation is not lheappJ icants ' responsibility. 6. This recommendation is beyond the scope of the applicants' approvals and responsibilities, 7 We believe' this is clearly shown in the analysis submitted with the application of the proposed change. 8. As the submitted analysis demonstrates the traffic generated by the proposed intensities does not it exceed the previous approvals the determination of onsite or offsite improvements is not the responsibility of the applicant. 21 Comment: IndIcate the target market for the reSIdentIal umts. Re$pOose: The target market is indeterminate at this. If you should have any further questIOns, please feel free to contact me at any tIme. Euge A. Gerhca, P.E. Vice PresIdent DIrector of Engmeenng c:QLP/corr/planning and zoning.doc 01/22/2001 16 20 1-561-689-5559 WINSTON LEE PAGE 01 I ~inston ee . SSOclates, InC. Landstapc Architecture Land PIllJ1Jlwg P.$.L. #lC C116 January 221 2001 Mr DaVId Norris, Esq. Law Offices of Cohen" NorrJs. Scherer, Weinberger & Wolmer 712 U.S. Highway One, 4tll Floor North Palm Beach, FL 33408 RE Quantum Park - Nope Amendment #11 File Number1Y1PJ\.1D 00-007 Our File No 98010,23 De8J' Mr Norris: Outlined below are my responses to the Boynton Beach TRe Comments. 3 The request IS for modification of use designation only on prevIOusly platted lots. No other changes are being requested. Therefore. descriptions of existing platted easements is not applicable. 4. It is unknovm at this point bow the lots, in any combmf1.tion, are going to be planned and approved. Therefore, this comment is not apphcable and is premature in requiring lots be combined. 5 At such time as pemuts are hein requested, all working draWIngs for proposed construction will be signed and sealed, / 6 It is unh"tlown at this point if any ley, right of way, or easement will require abandonment. However~ applicant acknowledges erification of easement abandonments pnor to pennit review if applicable. 7 ThIs comment appears premature as this request is for use modIfication ofparceb Wltbm the master plan. However~ applicant acknowledges neW for review of addr(l3sing plan at time of penn it review for any project within Quantum. 8 No construction is proposed. in this request, therefore, the comment 15 non-applicable. 9 No waiver of plat is proposed in this request~ therefore, the comment is non-applicable. 1532 Old Okecchobce Road, Suite 1 06~ West Palm Beach, FL 33409~5270 Tel. 561-689-4670 · Fax: 561-689-5559 · E-mail- winstonwla@aoLcom 01/22/2001 MON 17 22 [TX/RX NO 8269] ~001 01/22/2001 16 20 1-561-689-5559 WINSTON LEE PAGE 02 Mr. David Norris, Esq. January 22~ 2001 Page 2 17 The proposal for the use designatIon of "mixed use" on the existing lots mcorporates multI- family usage. and commercial usage with the existing office usage These proposed uses are consistent with the local comprehensive plan as described in Policy I 16.1> '1ndustnal" and "Local Retail Commercial" 20 Preliminary site plans are not required at this stage. The proposed use designation change to <"mixed use" is for lots 23 through 39, which currently are use designated "office" and for lots 7 through II, whIch are currently use designated as "office or industrial" Therefore, the use designation request for lots 23 through 39 does not affect any industrial use. The use designati.on for lots 7 through 11 does not require any industrial usage. It is the owner's prerogative to select uses on the lots. Therefore. since industrial usage was not a required use, nor the sole use allowed for lots 7 through 11, these is no need to }l{ovi~ an upda.t<<l land use distribution or needs and supply data from within the comprehensive plan. 22. Applicant acknowledges that a master site plan will be required and must adhere to the land development regulations as prescribed m Section 1, Chapter 2, Section 7, Planned Industrial Developments. 24 This identical comment was made by staff during the last notice of proposed change for Quantum Park 8Ild was rejected by both the Planning & Development Board and the City Commission. as well as the applicant. The City of Boynton Beach's Comprehensive Plan currently does pennit residential usage in the industrial land use category as prescribed in Policy 1161 "Industrial'" and '''Looal Retail Commercial" Winston Lee, ASLA, AICP President cc: Eugene Gerlica 01/22/2001 MON 17 22 [TX/RX NO 8269] ~ 002 PI"DER TROUTH"" ,-O"SULTI"G. I"e. TransportatIon Planners and Engmeers 2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H West Palm Beach, FL 33406 (561) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663 Email pindertroutman@msn.com January 22, 2001 Mr Michael Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director City of Boynton Beach 100 E Boynton Beach Boulevard POBox 31 0 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Quantum Park NOPC # 11 - #PTCOO-204 Dear Mr Rumpf- The following responds to the City Comments for the above referenced project, Comment 1 This comment requests detailed level of service analysis and traffic data for existing and future condition Response The purpose of the NOPC traffic analysis is to determine if the proposed change results in a substantial deviation Florida Statutes (F S ) Chapter 380 06 Section (19)(b) 15 states that "A 15% increase in the number of external vehicle trips generated by the development above that which was projected during the original development-of-regional-impact review" constitutes a substantial deviation The data and analysis demonstrates that the proposed plan represents a decrease in Daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour trip generation from the original development-of regional-impact review Therefore, the proposed change is not a substantial deviation and, intersection and roadway link analyses for existing and future conditions are not required Comment 18.a Office square footage is inconsistent between the Traffic Analysis and the Master Plan Response The square footage shown on the Master Plan is the maximum that cannot be exceeded The traffic analysis presents the proposed development plan Comment 18.b Total square footage is inconsistent between the traffic analysis and the Master Plan Response The square footages shown on the Master Plan are the maximums that cannot be exceeded The traffic analysis presents the proposed development plan In addition, the theater is shown as seats in the traffic analysis and not included in the total square footage on the Master Plan Letter Rumpf 00-204 7 22-07 Pi Mr Michael Rumpf Re: Quantum Park NOPC # 11 - #PTCOO-204 January 22, 2001 Page 2 Comment 18.c AM and PM peak hour trip generation rates are different between previous and current traffic analyses, Response The AM and PM peak hour trip generation rates have been changed to be consistent with those presented for NOPC #10 in tables dated 2/28/00 The revised tables dated 1/22101 are attached The result is a greater differential between the peak hour of the approved and proposed uses than shown on tables dated 12/18/00 for NOPC #11 In order to help in the review process we have included the Daily as well as AM peak hour and PM peak hour comparative trip generation tables. KMP/ldr Attachments Letter Rumpf 00-204 7 22-07 Pi #PTCOO-204 1/22/01 tripgen copm ADA&NOPC1 1 00.204 1 -22-01 Page 1 of3 Attachment 1 A Quantum Park NOPC #11 Daily Trip Generation CompariSQn ADA Approved land Use land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Industrial 110 4,183,750 SF(2) T -7 468()()-101,921 31,142 Retail 820 300,000 SF(3) Lnm=O,643Ln(X) +5.866 13,815 Office 710 1,969,500 SF(4) 9.14/1000 SF (5) 18,001 Hotel 312 200 Rms 8.7 IRm, 1,740 64,698 Prooosed land Use land Use Code Intensitv Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Industrial 110 1,900,000 SF T -7 468(X)-101.921 14,087 Retail 820 427,962 SF Lnm=O,643Ln(X) + 5,866 17,361 Office 710 725,850 SF 914/1000 SF (5) 6,634 Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 4.96 11000 SF 113 Hotel 312 200 Rms 8,7/Rm, 1,740 Park N Ride 90 633 Auto Oealershio 841 53,072 SF 23/1000 SF 1,221 Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.43 ISeat (6) 1 ,720 Restaurant-Hilzh Turnover 832 28,400 SF 130.34/1000 SF 3,702 Restaurant-Oualitv 831 69,250 SF 89.95 11000 SF 6,229 ConvenienceStorelGas 853 3,054 SF 845,6 11000 SF 2,582 Ice Skatin2 Rink m 465 93,430 SF 549.5 IRink 1,099 Residential Multi-Family 220 1,000 Ous 6.63 IOU 6,630 63,751 Net New External Tripsl (947)~ (1) Source: Institute ofT ransportltion Engineers (lTE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition. (2) Based on 12,500 SF per N:1e for 334.7 N:res. (3) Based on 10,000 SF per N:1e for 30 N:res. (4) Based on 15,000 SF per N:1e for 164.9 N:res. (5) Based on trip rate for 500,000 SF from 6th Edition Equation.. (6) Palm Beach County Rate for Multi-Screen Theatre (7) 2 Rinks and 8,500 SF of ReslauranL Trip generation from Palm Beach Gardens facility. Attachment 1 B Quantum Park NOPC #11 AM Peak Hour Trip Generation Comparison #PTCOO.204 1/22/01 tripgen copm ADA&NOPC11 00-204 1 22-01 Page 2 of 3 ADA Approved land Use Total land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips Industrial 110 4,183,750 SF(2) 0.92 /1,000 SF (88/12) 3,849 Retail 820 300,000 SF(3) Ln m = O,596Ln (X)+2.329 (61/39) 307 Office 710 1,969,500 SF(4) 1.56 /1,000 SF (88/12) (5) 3,072 Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.58 /Room (59/41) 116 TOTALS 7,344 Proposed land Use Total land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips Industrial 110 1,900,000 SF 0.92/1,000 SF (88/12) 1,748 Retail 820 427,962 SF Ln m = 0.596Ln (X)+2,329 (61/39) 380 Office 710 725,850 SF 1.56 /1,000 SF (88/12) 1,132 Warehouse 150 22,700 SF o 45 /1,000 SF (82/18) 10 Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.58 /Room (59/41) 116 Park N Ride 90 16.67% of Daily (80/20) (5) 106 Auto Dealership 841 53,072 SF 2.21 /1,000 SF (73/27) 117 Movie Theater 444 4,000 Seats 0.02 /Seat (51/49) (6) 80 Restaurant-High Turnover 832 28,400 SF 9.27 /1,000 SF (52/48) 263 Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 0.81 /1,000 SF (51/49) 56 Convenience Store/Gas 845 3,054 SF 77.68/1,000 SF (50/50) 237 Ice Skating Rink 465 93,430 SF 2.94/1,000 SF (65/35) 275 Residential Multi-Family 220 1,000 Dus 0.51 /DU(16/84) 510 ITUrAU:i 5,030 Net New External Tripsl (2,314)l (1) Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE), Trip Generation. 6th Edition. (2) Based on 12,500 SF per Acre for 334.7 Acres. (3) Based on 10,000 SF per Acre for 30 Acres. (4) Based on 15,000 SF per N:.re for 164.9 N:.res, (5) Based on the Peak Hour to Daily Ratio from ITE 6th Edition. (6) Only One Observation Attachment 1 C Quantum Park NOPC #11 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Comparison #PTCOO-204 1/22/01 tripgen copm ADA&NOPC11 00-204 1-22-01 Page 3 of 3 ADA Approved Land Use Total Land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips Industrial 110 4,183,750 SF(2) 0.98/1,000 SF (12/88) 4,100 Retail 820 300,000 SF(3) In m = 0 660ln (X)+3 403 (48/52) 1,297 Office 710 1,969,500 Sf(4) 1 49/1,000 SF (57/43) 2,935 Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.62 /Room (60/40) 124 TOTALS 8,456 Proposed Land Use Total Land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips Industrial 110 1,900,000 SF 0.98/1,000 SF (12/88) 1,862 Retail 820 427,962 SF In m = Q,660ln (X)+3 403 (48/52) 1,639 Office 710 725,850 Sf 1 49/1,000 Sf (57/43) 1,082 Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 0.51 /1,000 SF (24/76) 12 Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.62 IRoom (60/40) 124 Park N Ride 90 14.00% of Daily (22/78) (5) 89 Auto Dealership 841 53,072 SF 2.8 /1,000 SF (40/60) 149 Movie Theater 444 4,000 Seats 0.14 ISeat (53/47) 560 Restaurant-High Turnover 832 28,400 SF 10.86 /1,000 SF (60/40) 308 Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 749/1,000 SF (67/33) 519 Convenience Store/Gas 845 3,054 SF 96.37 /1,000 SF (50/50) 294 Ice Skating Rink 465 93,430 SF 2.36 /1,000 SF (45/55) 220 Residential Multi-Family 220 1,000 Dus 0.62 /DU (67/33) 620 TOTALS 7,478 Net New External Tripsl (978)~ (1) Source: Institute ofTransportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation. 6th Edition, (2) Based on 12,500 SF per Acre for 334.7 Acres. (3) Based on 10,000 SF per Acre for 30 Acres. (4) Based on 15,000 SF per Acre for 164,9 Acres. (5) Based on the Peak Hour to Daily Ratio from ITE 6th Edition, Facsimile TRANSMIIT AL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD PO BOX310 BOYNTON BEACH} FlOR'DA 33425-0310 FAX (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION To Fax # Date From Re Pages Zuref1e ~'-<CCA/ f, f C 57P/) -T~u - )'-/29 ;;/,lf1J 1/ 02Do / C<ft~-:w~ctv I~'?~LJ lYa~ ", . . /J rU Ii a? - L IfJm ' hlf2'.:J- i:i II ;2 mcludmg cover sheet ~~J !rlvWvmtJ d,d-dv.h 1/) o ~ )v~h I&Yrlrl, fr Z l).fUU-tPJL .... '--... r =--- ....5 C""'C ~J'" -....5 ~ 'S:S; .-- ...... .... '-- c~ ::C/:~~:-: .::::::-.... C2 ~..J;..... 3e~~h r:J ~:: ]]-2': ~ .... -' ""'1_, "" ;-..:. :--:,..;' C.- : ..! :"' _J... .... ~ c QUANTUM PARK OF BOYNTON BEACH DRI - NOPC AMENDMENT #11 SCHEDULE ADVERT P&D CC CC - PH (1) DATE MEETING 1 ST READING 2ND READING A Feb 25,2001 Feb 13,2001 Feb 20,2001 March 6, 2001 (1) Public Hearing The followmg dates have been denved pursuant to schedulmg reqUIrements outlmed m Chapter 38006 F S 1 DR! /NOPC ReceIved December 19, 2000 2 30-Day Marker * January 17, 2001 3 45-Day Marker * February 1, 2001 (DCA Comments due 2/2/01) 4 90-Day Deadlme March 18,2001 * The CIty IS reqUIred to gIve a 15 day notice (no sooner than 30 days and no later than 45 days from the date the NOPC apphcatIon was receIved) to DCA, Treasure Coast RPC and the apphcant of the scheduled date for the pubhc heanng. 01/11/01 <:At-lSMISSIm~ VEPIFICATION REPORT TIME 01/11/2001 13 39 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5513755259 TEL 5513755250 DATE,TIME FAx NO. INAfI'1E DURA T I O~~ PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 01/11 13 38 97413242'3 013 00 44 02 01" STAt-lDARD EC~~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Division of Planning and Zoning Building Planning & Zoning Engineering Occupational License Community Redevelopment January 10, 2001 Angela D Usher Plannmg SpecIalIst The School DIstnct of Palm Beach County, Flonda Plannmg & Real Estate 3320 Forest HIll Boulevard, C-331 West Palm Beach, FL 33406-5813 RE Quantum Park - DRIA 00-002/MPMD 00-007 Notice of Proposed Change - Master Plan Amendment #11 - Quantum Park Dear Ms. Usher, In accordance wIth ComprehensIve Plan PolIcy 8.22 1, the CIty IS to notIfy the Palm Beach County School DIstnct of all mcommg applIcatIOns for housmg developments that exceed 20 dwellmg umts. The CIty IS currently processmg an applIcatIOn for an amendment to the Quantum Park DR! Development Order, whIch meets thIS cntenon, Quantum Park of Commerce IS located on the west SIde of 1-95, between Mmer Road extended and the Boynton Canal (C-16) ThIS amendment proposes to change the approved uses on 14 lots totalmg 23.26 acres of the Quantum Park Master Plan, to allow for a "Mixed Use" desIgnation. Under the proposed change, the MIxed Use category mcludes an addItIOn of 500 multi- famIly resIdential dwellmg umts, wIth an estimate of 910 resIdents. The current Master Plan allows for 500 dwellmg umts whIch were approved with Amendment #10 last year We respectfully request a statement whIch WIll evaluate the Impact of the proposed amendment on the publIc school system and venfy that the educatIOnal needs of the potential school-aged chIldren lIvmg m the project can be met through eXIstmg or planned facIlIties, Please contact me at 561-742-6261 If you have any questIOns, Smcerely, -~ 11--::> / L..--'VC MIchael W Rumpf DIrector of Plannmg and Zomng J:\SHRDA TA\Planning\SHARED\ \\'"P'-.CORRESP\Corresp M thru Z\Angela D. Lsher Lener doc America's Gateway to tile Gulfstream 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach. Florida 33~25-0310 Phone: (561) 375-6260 FAX: (561) 375-6259