ANNUAL STATUS REPORT 1986
.~.
MEMORANDUM
18 March 1987
TO
Peter L Cheney, City Manager
FROM
Carmen S Annunziato, Planning Director
RE
Quantum Park at Boynton Beach - Annual Report
I have reviewed the Annual Report for the Quantum Park, and it
appears to accurately fulfill the reporting requirements. No
further action is necessary
I recommend that the original be filed with the City Clerk.
~S~
CARMEN S. ANN NZIATO
/bks
cc: Central File
.~!~~,~-
'J___~
.",......
...-
LAW OFFICES
MOYLE, FLANIGAN, KATZ, FITZGERALD & SHEEHAN, ~CENED
9TH F'LOOR. BARNETT CENTRE
KAREN LEVIN ALEXANDER
TI-IOMAS M. BEASON
PETER L. BRETON
ROBERT BRODY
E, COLE F'ITZGERALD. m
.JOI-IN F' F'LANIGAN
ANDREW F'ULTON. m
.JAMES PATRICK GARRITY
MYRA GENDEL
T1MOTI-IY P I-IOBAN
MARTIN V KATZ
WILLIAM B, KING
RONALD K, KOLINS
LISA MILLER LAYMAN
STEVEN A. MAYANS
.JON C. MOYLE
DAVID S, PRESSLY
MARK E, RAYMOND
TI-IOMAS A. SHEEI-IAN. m
DONNA 1-1. STINSON
MARTA M. SUAREZ MURIAS
VIRGINIA L. VANCE
NANCY KAREN VORPE
625 NORTH F'LAGLER DRIVE
POST OF'F'ICE BOX 3888
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
rES 24 1987
TELEPI-IONE (305) 659 7500
TELECOPIER (305) 659 1789
PLANNII'iG DE.PT.
TALLAI-IASSEE OF'F'ICE
SUITE 100. TI-IE PERKINS I-IOUSE
118 NORTI-I GADSDEN STREET
TALLAI-IASSEE, F'LORIDA 32301
TELEPI-IONE (904) 681 3828
Mr. Peter Cheney
City Manager
City of Boynton Beach
120 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
..... r:
RECEIVED
FE:Z ]Sa7
CITY ",
MA AuER'S' OFFICE
(..c... .
R.t-~ -
,'-~ f'-..
~O~.{'~
C.cLfL~--yL
Y
February 18, 1987
Re.
Quantum Park -at Boynton Beach - Annual Report
Dear Mr. Cheney:
On February 13, 1987 I mailed out to you an Annual Report for
Quantum Park at Boynton Beach. The cover letter that was attached
to that package had some er ror s on my par t; therefore, would you
please substitute the enclosed letter with that package so there
won't be any confusion.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
did not cause you any problems.
Hopefully, this
Sincerely,
David S. Pressly
BY~~
Debi Cain, secretary
.__..;~~~
cc. Department of Community Affairs
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
South Florida Water Management District
Department of Environmental Regulation
Department of Natural Resources
Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission
~
~-..-
, .
-.... .'
~;~~~~~\~~,
....,.... ...r'~ ......v..u_, ,,,,_"'~~-9-'~-" t':';c.::t1:l:iri~}....,_" "
~ ~~tr J~..;o,......4~~;-*~<c;t-llWd;;'.-
?,,<' .'4
--:-,.' -;a
'~';1
_5~; ;fj-i
~.,,~.~...
.,,,')'.:}
.{~x,~~
~~~!?:?,,;~~ ~
l48lP
... ~
LAW OF'F'ICES
'~
MOYLE, FLANIGAN, KATZ, FITZGERALD & SHEEHAN, P A.
..
KAREN LEVIN ALEXANDER
TMOMAS M BEASON
PETER L. BRETON
ROBERT BRODY
E. COLE F'ITZGERALD, m
.JOMN F' F'LANIGAN
ANDREW F'ULTON, m
.JAMES PATRICK GARRITY
MYRA GENDEL
TIMOTMY P MOBAN
MARTIN V KATZ
WILLIAM B, KING
RONALD K. KOLINS
LISA MILLER LAYMAN
STEVEN A, MAYANS
.JON C. MOYLE
DAVID S. PRESSLY
MARK E, RAYMOND
TMOMAS A. SMEEMAN, m
DONNA H. STINSON
MARTA M. SUAREZ MURIAS
VIRGINIA L, VANCE
NANCY KAREN VORPE
9TH F'LOOR. BARNETT CENTRE
625 NORTH F'LAGLER ORIVE
POST OF'F'ICE BOX 3668
WEST PALM BEACH, l"I.01UDA 33402
TELEPMONE (305) 659 7500
TELECOP'ER (305) 659 1789
TALLAMASSEE OF'F'ICE
SUITE 100. TME PERKINS MOUSE
118 NORTH GADSDEN STREET
TALLAMASSEE. F'LORIDA 32301
TELEPHONE (904) 681 38Ze
February 13, 1987
Mr Peter Cheney
City Manager
City of Boynton Beach
120 E Boynton Beach Blvd
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Re.
Quantum Park at Boynton Beach - Annual Report
Dear Mr
Cheney
Enclosed please find the 1986 Annual Status Report for Quantum
Park at Boynton Beach This Report is submi t ted in accordance
with Chapter 380, Fla Stats (1986) and the Development Order for
the development.
Sincerely,
~ .J p~ /de-
David S. Pressly
DSP/dc
cc Department of Community Affairs
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
South Florida Water Management District
Department of Environmental Regulation
Department of Natural Resources
Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission
l467P
....:...-,F..., ..,.-
.<'r
~,,,
~~
;~-;lt
_1:
. ...._- .-r.
,,>~~~
i'"-~
___~_~~,,,,.~,_.....~..~'_,:. ~~~J:;,
.....It.''_;..:-;a_
( If ......... _4,
"'~,,.c~,.....,,.~~- A'fL_ .
LAW OFFICES
MOYLE, FLANIGAN, KATZ, FITZGERALD & SHEEHAN, P A.
KAREN LEVIN ALEXANDER
THOMAS M. BEASON
PETER L, BRETON
ROBERT BRODY
E. COLE f'ITZGERALD. ill
.JOHN f' f'LANIGAN
ANDREW f'ULTON, ill
.JAMES PATRICK GARRITY
MYRA GENDEL
TIMOTHY P HOBAN
MARTIN V KATZ
WILLIAM B, KING
RONALD K. KOLlNS
LISA MILLER LAYMAN
STEVEN A, MAYANS
.JON C, MOYLE
DAVID S, PRESSLY
MARK E, RAYMOND
THOMAS A, SHEEHAN. ill
DONNA H STINSON
MARTA M SUAREZ MURIAS
VIRGINIA L, VANCE
NANCY KAREN VORPE
9TH FLOOR. BARNETT CENTRE
62S NORTH F'LAGLER DRIVE
POST OF'F'ICE BOX 3888
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
,.
TELEPHONE (305) 659 7500
TELECOPIER (305) 659 1789
TALLAHASSEE OF'F'ICE
SUITE 100. THE PERKINS HOUSE
118 NORTH GADSDEN STREET
TALLAHASSEE. f'LORIDA 32301
TELEPHONE (904) 681 3828
February 13, 1987
RECEIVED
~EB l' 1987
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
Mr. Peter Cheney
City Manager
City of Boynton Beach
120 E. Boynton Beach Blvd
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Re
Quantum Park at Boynton Beach - Annual Report
Dear Mr
steinbrenner
Enclosed please find the 1986 Annual Status Report for
Northpoint Corporate Park This Report is submitted in accordance
with Chapter 380, Fla. Stats. (1986) and the Development Order for
the development.
Sincerely,
~~.0U44~/"v
David S. Pressly
DSP/dc
cc Department of Community Affairs
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
South Florida Water Management District
Department of Environmental Regulation
Department of Natural Resources
Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission
l467P
"'~h-",""
:""l."'-...~.
..M"~-.-.:;~-,,..,..-ip,-!-- ~;\~.ti~;,-f,.~~~~~'~,..,v~Y~,,~Yf-.d-I:'~{,.
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
REPORTING PERIOD
JANUARY 1, 1986 to
DECEMBER 31, 198 h
DEVELOPMENT
QUANTUM FAR!< AT BOYN'TON BEACH (f/k/a Boynton Beach Park of Corrrrerce)
NAME OF DR!
LOCATION:
BOYNTON BEACH
CITY
PALM BEACH COUNTY
COUNTY
DEVELOPER NAME
ADDRESS
QUANIUM ASSOCIATES, a Florida Coeneral Partnership
2455 E. SUNRISE BLVD. SUITE 1106
FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33304
I ) Describe any changes made in the proposed plan of development, phasing,
or in the representations contained in the Application for Development
Approval since the Development of Regional Impact received approval Please
note any actions (substantial determinations) taken by local government to
address these Changes
Note If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit "A" a
detailed description of each change and copies of the modified site plan
drawings Exhibit "A" should also address the following additional items if
app I i cab I e
a) Describe changes in the plan of development or phasing for the reporting
year and for the subsequent years;
b) State any known incremental DRI applications for development approval or
request for a substantial deviation determination that were filed In the
reporting year and to be filed during the next year;
c) Attach a copy of any notice of the adoption of a development order or the
subsequent modification of an adopted development order that was recorded by
the developer pursuant to Subsection 380 06 (14), F.S
Response
See Exhibit "A" annexed hereto.
2) lias there been L.I cll.:lnge in loedl (Jovcrnment jurisdiction for uny portion
of the development since the development order was issued? If so, has the
annexing local government adopted a new Development of Regional Impact
development order for the project? Please provide a copy of the order adopted
by the annexing local government
Response
There has been no change in local government jurisdiction.
,_f _,_~< ,;<~} ,~i",', ,"'~lI1'~""''''';-'';''''~:~",~~~>:~'~'''';..t...
')
)
(
,-
I
,
1-
3) Provide copies of any revised master plans, incremental site plans, etc ,
not previously submitted
Note If a response if to be more than one or two sentences, attach as
Exhibit "B"
Response A copy of the revised Master Plan is attached as a part
of Exhibit "A "
4} Provide a summary comparlSlon of development activity proposed and
actually conducted for the reporting year
Example Number of dwelling units constructed, site improvements, lots sold,
acres mined, gross floor area constructed, barrels of storage capacity
completed, permits obtained, etc
Note If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit "e"
Response No development activity was specifically propose~ .
for the calendar year 1986 The develonment actlvlty
actually conducted for the calendar year 1986 consisted
of submitting eight (8) separate plats to the City for
approval, constructing a contruction compound, and
developing the sand pine scrub 9reserve.
5) Have any undeveloped tracts of land in the development (other than
individual single-family lots) been sold to a separate entity or developer?
If so, identify tract, its size, and the buyer Please provide maps which
show the tracts involved
Note If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit "0"
Response
Although one undeveloped tract of land in the development
is under a contract for sale, no undeveloped tracts have
been sold to date. For purposes of this resoonse, t~e
term "sold" was interpreted to mean a transfer of fee
simple title
.
~d<->"..rt.
'......:..l'o:
.t~Ji&,.~li"";;'/.._.,
;~~~~~..?-....c
"..,,;o.~
..
'\ '
(
(
I
') .
6) Describe any lands purchased or optioned adjacent to the original
Development of Regional Impact site sUbsequent to issuance of the development
order Identify such land, its size, and intended use on a site plan and map
Note If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit "E"
ResDonse No lands adjacent to the original DRI Site have been
purchased or optioned subsequent to the issuance of
the Development Order
7) List any substantial local, state, and federal permits which have been
obtained. applied for. or denied, during this reporting period Specify the
agency, type of permit, and duty of each
Note If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit "F"
Response See Exhibit" F" annexed hereto
8) Assess the development's and local government's continuing compliance with
any conditions of approval contained in the DRI development order, and assess
the developer's commitments, as contained in the application for development
approval. which have been identified by the local government, the Regional
Planning Councilor the Department of Community Affairs as being significant
Note Attach as Exhibit "G".
Response See Exhibit" G" annexed hereto
,:.i~~~ ~_.s..
~:~ ~~~i~~~~',,:=:~~Mil~~.
(
(
;
9) Provide any information that is specifically required by the Development
Order to be included in the annual report
Response Since there are no tenants in the development, no
additional information is required by the Development
Order that is not already contained in this Annual Status
Report
10) Provide a statement certifying that all persons have been sent copies of
the annual report in conformance with Subsections 380 06 ~+4~and ~~~~.
F S (15) (18)
Response The undersigned, on behalf of the Developer, certifies
that all persons have been sent copies of this Annual
Status Report, in conformance with 380 06 (15) and (18),
Fla Stats. (1986)
(15) Development Order Requirement
As part of the annual report required under Section 380 06 (16), Florida
Statutes. the developer shal I provide a list of all industrial tenants,
including a description of their activities and the four digit standard
Industrial Classification Code applicable to the operation A copy of this
list shall be provided to the Deparmtnet of Environmental Regulation, the
South Florida Water Management District. the City of Boynton Beach. and the
agency delegated the authority for maintaining, updating. and verifying the
master files for hazardous waste generators in Palm Beach County
Response During the calendar year of 1986 there were no industrial
tenants in the development.
Person comp let i ng the Quest ionai re JOJ!lI;f' A -f~
Ti tie AGENT/ATTORNEY
Representing QUANTUM ASSOCIATES, a Florida General Partnership
Original
Copies
City of Boynton Beach
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
Department of Community Affairs
Department of Environmental Regulation
South Florida Water Management District
Department of Natural Resources
Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission
, ',,'
J..ir,{ ,....:q.~~~~~i~~ -~~.....;,t.. ,.{i~4 ...~-
10>......~
~ 021087-1
1423P
EXHIBIT "A" TO ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
1. On June 3, 1986 the City of Boynton Beach adopted
Ordinance No 86-11 (copy of Ordinance and exhibits thereto
attached) amending the Development Order for the development
This Ordinance, and the exhibits thereto, set forth in detail the
changes in the plan of development, the actions taken by the City,
and the modified Site Plan A Notice of Modification of Adopted
Development Order was recorded on August 7, 1986 in Official
Records Book 4965, page 619, in the Public Records of Palm Beach
County (copy attached)
2 On October 7, 1986 the City of Boynton Beach adopted
Ordinance No 86-37 (copy of Ordinance and exhibits thereto
attached) amending the Development Order for the development
This Ordinance, and the exhibits thereto, set forth in detail the
changes in the plan of development, the actions taken by the city,
and the modified Site PIan A Notice of Modification of Adopted
Development Order was recorded on December 2, 1986 in Official
Records Book 5090, page 510, in the PUblic Records of Palm Beach
County (copy attached)
~.-,~?-_';"'~,~~~~-L~.ii~-i~~
021087-1
1426P
EXHIBITS "B," "C," "D," and "E"
TO ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
NOT APPLICABLE
, .'" ' ,
~.,.......~_l;.':_,-".' ......
c/
~1t.;:_"'~~
1.iF~_~,'
<~:;;~~.~~~<<j iii
~.
021087-1
l427P
EXHIBIT - "F" TO ANNUAL
STATUS REPORT
1 Stat e of F lor ida - Game and
Scientific Collecting/Research Permit
Gopher Tortoise to Sand Pine Preserve
Freshwater Fish Commission
July 9, 1986 to relocate
2. Department of Army Application #861PS-2ll37 not yet
approved - applied 10/29/86 to remove drainage ditch and reshape
the LWDD Canal E-4
3 State of Florida DER for construction of bridges and
utility crossings canals E-4 and C-16
4. State of Florida DER not yet approved applied 10/29/86 to
remove drainage ditch and reshape the LWDD Canal E-4
5 SFWMD Drainage and Outfall Facilities, Quantum Park
permit received 12/11/86, #50l-0l503-S
6 State of Florida-Department of Health and Rehabilitative
Services two permits'
(a) Water Distribution System #5086-4946NG dated 12/1/86
(b) Waste Water Collection and Transmission for Offsite
Treatment Approval #CS337-86, dated 12/1/86
7. Lake Worth Drainage District LWDD Project #8600323D,
Stormwater Transmission E-4, L-33 and Boynton Canal Permit
approved January 15, 1987 issuance pending Department of Army
approval-#2 above
8. Palm Beach County approval of construction plans for
Northwest 22nd Avenue applied 9/86 approval pending.
9. City of Boynton Beach approval of preliminary plats and
infrastructure improvements 1/20/87.
~...,;..;.~;-.:,-".".;:- i....~~~~..
~. 021087-1
l428P
EXHIBIT "G" TO ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
The Developer and the city of Boynton Beach are in substantial
compliance with the Development Order for the calendar year 1986,
and there have been no items or matters that would be classified
as a "Significant Deviation" under Chapter 380, Fla Stats
Commitments as indicated in the question were maintained and
progress continued on all matters necessary to allow development
to begin as quickly as possible
;..~.
9.-!<;l'p-.$.'~'.~
/ ,
...-
i
~ ,~ r
,..,- ~
.., r )
.-
ORDINANCE NO 86- I f
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
DETERMINING THAT CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE
DEVELOPl-1ENT OF REGIONAf.l IMPACT APPROVED IN
ORDINANCE NO 84-51 DO NOT CONSTITUTE A
SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION UNDER CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA
STATUTES, 1985, DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW IS
NECESSARY REGARDING SUCII CHANGES, APPROVING SUCH
CHANGES, AND AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER
(ORDINANCE NO 84-51) FOR PURPOSES OF
INCORPORATING THE APPROVED CHANGES
...
WHEREAS, Riteco Development Corporation, a Florida corporation
("Riteco") filed with the City of Boynton Beach (the "City") an
Appl i cation for Deve lopment Approval of Comprehensi ve Development
of Regional Impact (the "ADA") on May 21, 1984, regarding that
certain property (the "property") described in Exhibit "A,"
attached hereto and made a part hereof: and
WHEREAS, the ADA was approved and the Development Order for
the Property was granted December 18, 1984 pursuant to Ordinance
No. 84-51 (the "Development Order"): and
WHEREAS, Riteco subsequently conveyed its right, title and
interest in and to the Property to Boynton Park of Co~merce, Inc ,
a Florida corporation ("Boynton park"), and, Boynton park, in
turn, subsequently conveyed its right, title, and interest in and
,
to
the Proper ty
to
Quantum Associ ates,
a Florida general
partnership (the "Developer"), the current record fee simple owner
of the Property: and
WHEREAS, Developer has filed with the City an application to
amend the Develop~ent Order: and
HHEREAS, the City Council o~ Boynton Beach, as the governing
body having jurisdiction, is authorized and empm'lered to consider
applications for
arnendnents to development orders approving
developnents of regional i"pact pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida
Statutes (1985) and
WHEREAS, upon publiCation und furnishing of riue notice, pUblic
hearings on these proceedings were held April 8, 1986, before the
- (;
v'
~,.
~.~~^
..._;f~-~~~-:'
,~..,;;;~- ,~
I
I
l'
J
'Ie \,4
'.
\"1
planning and Zoning Boarn, and J\pril 22, 1986, before the city
council of Boynton Beach: and
..
WHEREAS, the said city council has considered the testimony,
reports and other <'locumentary evidence submitted at said public
hearings by Developer,
the Treasure Coast Regional planning
Council, the Boynton Beach staff, the Boynton Beach Planning and
Zoning Board, and the public: and
WHEREAS, said City council has considered all of the foregoing
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINE0 by the City Council of Boynton
Beach, that said City Council makes the following findings of fact
Section 1
A notice of public hearing in the proceedings was
duly publi shed on l,pril
--2-, 1986, in THE POST
, a newspaper
of general circulation in Boynton Beach, Florida, pursuant to
Ch apt e r 3 8 0, F lor i d a S tat ute s , and proof 0 f sa i d pub 1 i cat ion has
been duly filed in these proceedings
Section 2.
Developer has requested that the Development Order
be amended as follows
A. That the Amended Master Site Development plan ("Amended
Master Site Development Plan"), attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and
made a part hereof, submitted by Applicant in its application for
Amendment to the Development Order replace and supercede the
Master
Site
Development
Plan
originally
approved
in
the
Development Order
B That Section 4(1) be amended by addIng the following
subparagraph (c)
(c) Boynton Beach Park of Co~merce ADA,
~1aster Si te Development pI an submi tted
21, 1986
Ameneed
January
C
That
references throuqhout
the Development Oreer be
revised to conforM to the Amended llilst'2r site DevelopMent Plan
D
That
references throushout
the Development Order be
revised, \.Jhere applicable, to contorn to the re:nesenta:ions set
forth in that cert~lin letter (the "Letter") froD George W
Zimmerman to C.::r....en i\nnunZl<1to ur.der c].:lte of rebru.:lt''' :8, 1986,
attache<'l hereto as EJ'}nhit "C" lna l:1ade 1 port hpreof
- f1
-~v
0151D
-2-
~~
.....,~~~~..~ t.if~~:~~: -t*~;/j._.
.-+-~- "'" ~..~~;~~~{.~;.~.]:
I f J
.., "
~.
.)
Section 3
Upon consIderation of all matters described in
Section 380, Florida Statutes (1985), it is hereby determined that
...
A The amendments proposed by Developer do not unreasonably
~r
i nte r fere wi th the ach i evement 0 f the obj ect i ve s of an adopted
state land development plan applicable to the area
B The amendments proposed by Developer are consi stent wi th
the
local
cOr.lprehensive
plan
and
loc al
land
development
regulations
C. The amendments proposed by Developer are consi stent wi th
the recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
council on file in these proceedings
D. The amendments proposed by Developer do not consti tute a
substantial deviation under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes (1985)
E. The amendments proposed by Developer do not require
further development of regional impact review
Section 4.
The City Council has concluded as a matter of law
that these proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes (1985), that Developer
is entitled to the relief prayed and applied for, and the
Deve lopment Or der is he reby amended i nco rpo r at i ng the amendments
proposed by Developer as set forth in Section 2 above, subject to
the following special conditions with which Applicant accepts and
agrees to cOiply
(1) Those conditions set forth In the Developient Oreer
( 2) Th at an addeneum be added to the ,.1 an age!:len t Pl.:o"1 fo r the
Sand Pine Scrub Preserve, containing the following inforr.lation
(a) conceptual plans depicting the extent. and location
of any boarodalr(s) proposec in the Sand pine Scrub ?reserve area,
i n c 1 u din gad e s c rip t ion 0 f h 0\'" the boa r d .... a n ( s ) ',I 0 U 1 d be r.l <:l n a q e d
for educational pJrposes and ~aintJined
(b) h s:)cci:ic stc:t0r:ient as to './110 O..ll.~ ~e r'2s:::lonsible
for the ma:1age'""ent or the sz:nd ?ine Scrub "...", -.r n
:!1C for the
costs of such ~on2ce,ent
( c)
Ic~nti fy "/here the (CqUI red forti
( .i 0) ac ( e s 0 f S clnG fJ
- -~'-'
plne scrub canop/, understor;--c:-mt groundcover veqC't~tIon (us set
0151D
-3-
~~~;
.;.W;",;,L~~.i/...~!.t~{{;.;.;.
~. .~>-..~t....;;~~.
I
/ 1
r
~ .... ,t
.
->1
forth in Condition No 6 of the Development Order) will occur, as
well as a statement as to how these acres will be maintained based
..,
upon the location and distribution thereof
(3) That the Developer comply with the repre sen tat io ns set
forth in the Letter (described in section 2 D. above)
Section
5
Except
as
otherwise
amended
herein,
the
Development Order shall remain in full force and effect
Section 6
A copy of thi s Ordi nance shall be transni tted by
first class U S Mail, certified return receipt requested, to the
Bureau of Land and tiater r1anagement, the Department of Communi ty
Affairs,
Quantum Associ ates
(the
owner/developer),
and the
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
Section 7.
This Ordinance shall become effective ir.mediately
upon passage
FIRST READING this ~ day of May, 1986
SECOND READING and FINAL PASSAGE this 3rd
day of June, 1986.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
M~.c t! W<Y' <?d</r~
Ct"t 11 ~~YY\/YJ-1..<:/?'r/1. (l/}U
VI~CE-i-iAi'o~/ ~#~./
~~~/ // /? ~,
~F0//': . r
COU ?CIL 'S 3=:q /
/' .-., / -- I
/1 '7: /!\ ,~~<Lv ~,)L-
LCJ.C...~ ~,2r. ,I
r; , t
-- {tf ~ -,,"} !.l.{ t, (j
COUL'C I L ;.~E B R
~~~~
CITY . Rr(
E/HIBITS
.. ~ n
n.
"B"
"c n
Leg~l De~c:.nt_on
- ;.. r.1 ~ nee c a .s t c [ SIt e Dc vel 0 r ~ C~ n t ') 1 - n
- Letter
~(;
~,V
0151D
-4-
""r..;...,~
, :.h.ki..;'!i~","
~~~ .~._.;..
~'"
J
'1 ...
/ \)
.. · r
. .
"
..
EXHIBIT "A"
OVERALL BOOND~RY
."
.
.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A Tract of land lying partially in Sections 16, 17, 20 and 21, Tow~ship
45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, said Tract-belng
more particularly described as follows. Commencing at the southwest
c~rner of said Section 17; thence North 1.14"39" East, along the West
llne of Section 17, a distance of 1318.10 feet to a point in the
intersection with the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue, as recorded in
O.R. Book 1738, Page ~686, of the Public Records of Palm Beach countJ,
Florida; thence with a bearing of North 89004'32" East, along the
centerline, of N.W. 22nd Avenue, a distance of 778.37 feet to the Point
of Beginning; thence North 1.44'39" East a distance of 1247.06 feet to
the South right of way line of L.W.D.D. Lateral 21; thence North
89008r49" East, along the South right of way line of L.W.D.D.
Lateral 21, as recorded in O.R. Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public
Records of Pal~ Beach County, Florida, a distance of 635.93 feet to the
centerline of the L.W.D.D. Equalizing Canal E-4 Canal, as recorded in
O.R. Book 1732, Page 6-12 of Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida; the~ce along the centerline of the above described E-4 Canal
with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of North 10.32'52"
~East, a radius of 750.00 feet, a central angle of 4.04'17", and an arc
length of 53.29 feet; thence continue along the centerline of the E-4
.~:. Canal, with a bearing 9f. North 12035'00" East, a distance of 320.69 feet -.
r to a point of cu~~e; thence with a curve, to the left having a radius of
-. 6500.00, a ce~~al angle of 3028'30", and an arc length of 394.23 feet;
;~~. thence North 9006'30" East, a d'istance of 1979.16 feet to a point on the ~;"..,::"
.....: North Line of Section 17; thence with a bearing of North 89.16'39" East, ~-'
.....along the North line of Section 17, a distance of 1964.50 feet; thence !~:~.~~~_:
South 0002'11" East, a distance of 2625.18 feet; thence North 89.08'49"
East, a dista~ce of 368.96 feet to a point on the North right of way .0:; ;..
line of"11.W. 2~~d-Avenue$as recorded in G.R. Book 1738, page 1686 of the . ~..,
-.. ,
Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence South 19027'31" .., ,
East, a distance of 50.00 feet to the centerline of N.~'1. 22nd Avenue; ~.~~"
thence wi th a =u=v~ to the right having a chord bearinc}--'bf North
75029'49" Eas~, a radius of 1637.02 feet, a central angle of 9053'58",
and an arc le~g~~ of 282.85 feet to a point; thence North 12002'41"
East, a distance of 915.72 feet; thence North 0031'11" East, a distance.
6f:399:7.0 feet; thence North 89012'37" East, a distance of 413.21 feet; .:.~";~._-
.. thence South 5a~22'56" East, a distance of 1349.70 feet to a point on
the West right of way line of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad; thence
south 0028'21" East, along the West right of way line of the Railroad, a
distance of 1309.09 feet to a point on the centerline of N.~. 22nd
Avenue; thence ~;orth 88027' 31" ~-lest, along the cen terl ine of N.H. 22nd
Avenue a diS~2.~ce of 672.97 feet; thence South 0033'53" East, a distance
of 1306.69 fee~; thence South 88045'31" East, a distance of 333 51 feet
to a point on the West right of way of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad,
thence with a bearing of South 14.08'23" \-Test, along the \-:est right of
way of the railroad, a distance of 1312.49 feet; thence South 0.33'53"
East a distance of 26.69 feet; thence South 13015'22" ~';est, a dist.:mce
of 920.57 feet.; thence Nort, 88050'04" ~.;'est, a distance of 187.60 feet; .....-
thence with a bearing of North 0.49'21" ~est, a distance of 200.00 feet.
thence Nort~ 38050'04" West, a distance of 218.00 feet; thence South '
0"49'21" Eas'; a distance of 200 00 feet. thence North 88050'0';" \.;'est a
distance of ~o.oa feet, thence south 00~9'21" E.J.st, a distance of 556:84
feet; thence !.ort, 88050'04" t't'est, a distance of.3G17 26 fee,; to a point
on the cente~line of the above descr~8ed centerline of the E-4 C.J.n.J.l
thence with a bearing of Nor~h 5018'1.." T,est,.a di~Llnce of 153.13 f~et,
thence with a cur e to the rlght hdvlng a LddlUS of 450 00 feet, a
centr.:ll angle of 15036'44", ilnd <l~ a.rc length of 1~2 62 feet, thence
l~orth 10018'30" East, a dist.J.nce of,988 60 f<?et to .J. point of curve,
tnence with a curle to the left h<1Vlng .J. cldlUS of 450.00 feet, a
centr.:ll angle of 18020'00", and an arc lenqth of 1.13 99 feet, thence ---0
with a bearing of lIorth 8001 '30" tlest, a distance of 1255.14 feet to a
point on the centerline of N.H. 22nd J\v7nue, thence with a bearing of
South 8900..'32" ~':est, along the centerline of ll.t'l. 22nd \'-lem:e a
distance of 817.85 feet more or less to the Point of Oeginning.
CO~~~_~5.rg 5S~.55 acres more or less .J.nd subject to e3sc~ents and
of ..<1.: of ~e:cor::d- '0-'
.r ~'...
~.,
~ ..
,';'41. ...
. -~~"-=-
.... .
.t .'
.f.'
. 4-
rig h t 5' - -.;-
... .. ..;-~
~ ....: ;.....,..;1..
.~ . ---'. ..;-;#:.{~
- ~., - ~ - a:/ :',~,~:;.r,;.
": ~.10--. --- .,..:~;. ...::.....
.,
,...{:_-!. '~~Ji.1<A ..~~t:.__-
..;j;.~-o.r.'J.~-~;<'.'''''''_'.i"~
.-_}. ~v
a.--
'"
.0
,
, ..
AMENDED MASTER
SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
JANUARY 21, 1986
Prepared by
DEUTSCH/IRELAND PROPERTIES
In Consultation with
RICHARD L BOWEN & ASSOCIATES. Planners and Engineers
THE ROY BARDEN PLANNING GROUP. Landscape Architect
ROSSI & MALAVASI ENGINEERS. INC. Civil Group
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES. INC , Traffic Engineers
GOODKIN RESEARCH CORPORATION, Economic & Marketing Analysis
COGNETICS, INC , Marketing
Ex HriJT - 1\.11 '\
-"";;..,
--i ;-~~iE?"~.f_. ~1o...=i'?7--t;l
~~.~ ;"". .~..1- /" -_4.r~",J._
- - ----- -- ----
--------------- ------
II
..,.
t.
.
)
r t
DEUTSCH IRELAND
PROPERTIES
"I.~" TO "OIllT LAUOEflIOAf.K OFF,C&
January 21, 1986
Mr. Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
120 N.E. Second Avenue
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
RE Amended Master Site Development Plan Submission
Boynton Beach Park of Commerce
Dear Carmen:
In accordance with our meeting last week, I am transmitting to
you herewith, thirty copies of our Amended Master Site
Development Plan. Each of the copies is a package containing
the report document, six large drawings as listed in the report
document, and a letter indicating the required revision we are
requesting to the Development Order
We are also submitting, before the end of the week, eighteen
additional copies to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
and six additional copies to Luann Rains at the State Depart-
ment of Community Affairs. It is our understanding that this
submission fully meets the requirements identified under the State
Legislation and City Code If you have any question or there are
further submittals required, please let us know as soon as
possible.
Thank you.
GZ ak
Enclosures
CC Mr. Thomas K Ireland
Mr. Edward B Deutsch
Jon C. Moyle, Esquire I
David Pressly, Esquire~
SUITE 1106-INTERNATIONAl BUllDING-2455 E, SUNRISE BOULEVARD-FORT LAUDERDAlE. FLORIDA 33304 -(305) 564-511.
THE BUilDING - 1125 NORTHEAST 125 STREET NORTH MIAMI. FLORIDA 33161 - (305) 891-6806
AFFIlIATES: BROlEN REALTY & , 'cPAfNT CORP MITA CONSTRUCTION CORP
t ,i-i:~l>>tj:;r.';:i.:..
:~-.",.;;..-
.*........*~
"
,o.t-
AN AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR
BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE
.
Deutsch/Ireland Properties is pleased to submit herewith, this
amendment to' the Master Site Development Plan for the Boynton
Beach Park of Commerce. The amendment documents include this
booklet of material which provides an explanation of the
refinements made to the Master Site Development Plan, as well as
backup analysis providing the justification for such refinements and
six drawings as follow: site plan, grading plan, drainage plan,
mitigation plan, water plan and sewer plan, and the attached request
for a proposed revision to the Development Order This request
is being made in order to formalize a final Master Site Development
Plan to be used as the basis for subdivision and public improvements
engineering.
We see the development of this Master Plan as a refinement, rather
than a change, to what has been previously submitted to the State
Department of Community Affairs, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council and the City of Boynton Beach This plan reflects a
reduction in net development acreage from 411.2 acres to 361.1 acres,
over what was approved in the ADA/DRI
Our primary effort in arriving at this amendment was to finalize
a plan that was illustrative of the original concept and which met
the following goals:
1 To refine the master plan; to incorporate requirements of
the Development Order, specifically the set-aside of a 40-
acre sand pine preserve and the incorporation of the City
Park through a land exchange
2 To refine the master plan; to incorporate the requirements of
a singl~ phased construction plan consistent with our marketing
plan.
3. To refine the master plan; to reflect the outcome of our
marketing research which has affected parcel sizes and
orientations
4 To refine the master pIan; to reflect changes in traffic due
to a loss of 50 1 acres of developed land.
5 To refine the master plan; to incorporate drainage changes
consistent with the new South Florida Water Management
District's regulations now in effect, plus the reduction of
developed acreage and the increase of open space
6 To refine the master plan; to eliminate the rail-loading area
and incorporate the potential for individual rail spurs at
development sites.
~.;:;;-~,..-~~:;.... ..~~".":.. -~.
:r__:;;..... ~-~,-=:-..,_.j~~,-~
l'
..
,THE MF.STER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
f
, .
The colored plan on the following page illustrates the Master
Site Development Plan in its amended form Following it is a
copy of map H-l illustrating the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce
as originally submitted in the DRI document. In reviewing
the documents for consistency, there are four areas of refine-
ment that are discussed hereafter in detail
1 Land uses - Land uses have been adjusted to incorporate
both the sand pine preserve and the City Park in a manner
consistent with the requirements of the Development Order
2 Road alignments - The road alignments have been refined
to serve the reduced developed acreage, as well as the
revised parcel sizes.
3 Phasing - The revision of project phasing to accommodate
a single, public-improvement construction phase, as well
as single marketing phase.
4 Parcel sizes - A refinement of parcel sizes and orientation
to conform with the marketing research and proposed sales
plan
AMENDED LAND USE
The Amended Master Site Development Plan is essentially unchanged
from the ADA/DRI plan. It is still proposed to be developed as a
nearly self-contained, planned comprehensive industrial/office
park The mix of uses in the amended plan still contains those
types of light industrial, office, hotel, retail and commercial trade
activities as permitted by Section 7, Planned Industrial Development
(PID), District of the Boynton Beach Zoning Code, as adopted June 3,
1975
A comparison of land use in the approved ADA/DRI and Amended Master
Site Development Plan is shown in Table 1.
The Amended Plan contains 30 4 acres of commercial use, of which
3 4 acres are recreational; 133 1 acres of office use; 197 6 acres
of light industrial use, of which 53 3 acres are to be used for
research and development industrial activity; 144 9 acres of open
space, of which 50 3 acres are lakes, 6 acres are wetland preserve,
40 acres are sand pine preserve (in one parcel as agreed to by staff
of the City of Boynton Beach and Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council in 1985); and 33 9 acres of additional internal arterial
roadways
Arrangement of these proposed land uses within the Amended Master
Development Plan are primarily the same as proposed in the approved
ADA/DRI Plan Office uses are proposed along NW 22nd Avenue, around
the proposed interchange at Interstate 95, and across from Motorola
near Congress Avenue Commercial uses, including the club recrea-
tional facility are also proposed to be located on NW 22nd Avenue
and along one of the arterials south of 22nd
-2-
~,';.,f.!,,:"";."",,*
~ "
:::>!.
'\
'n' J,;?l!;.J~:~,-Q'
'. 'ltm~
t .;.
/:
,~
/1
/I
I ,
I111
:1
i
I
· it
..,. :1
. .
I
/
j i
, I
!I
!J
.~,
'~J;I
" -
&.-..:.-.~-_.-
--- - ---
: ~
I
1
--:-=-'1TI
I: l>f~"I'
II ~rf"~ ~;---~I
'I \ r, I l' ,I
: ~!-:---:!
I ., II
I I I
........ I a I
, ..... 'L ,~\
i';\ L- I C=]
J L- __,'_ J
:: r==-l
ill
;~I C_
ll:\
III!
li;1
~~"--.-
.r ,
i.
're I}
f"\l :
f \.,
.
f",,--
~~~
Oj~r:l9PS1
jf,~~o~
@1f'~
oOd~l~
. ~, ~
r
UI;) ] ,~~ ~
~ ~!11l\~~.
\' _~::JocJ:' ~?!~l)"
~lli1f{:i c) lin nl~~ i'Ult",
MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
4'@
MSP-IA ....'-' -
- ---... l:R.-1
,-
1 . :
UOO'
I
J
__a a.._
~EGEND
~ CIM~ - ".-'J ' so.t .c_
c~,c.at _.t....
Ollln ' us.. .c.
Ind".'"'' ....J &e.
M....ret. II OIl.,........ ............- il.J &C.
0..... ~pM.-.... __]
le.... -.....1... 104.' ac.
W.U..G1.- .....
~ - .Ie_..., ...... ... ....c..,.. IIfC. ~...
j1'\' flF,tJTSCn IREI.ANO L.. ..... _...... ,...._ _ ..... ,....,._ ,~..:
J.A.J I'lIlN'UlIUJI ..~r..
1---.
IA
L __
r.....- .....
_ t:= f.n L.........
(:=:::J s..... PI.. "...,"'.
c:=::J NWlAe. ----
TUT AL
'0,0 .c.
n,9 ac.
$19.9 oc
_._.. ____.. ..,.. _...." 'e,__
.......-...- ._,.... .....-..-
*,,- Ni-~4...~~
01
/
I'
, i
N
J}
.."a.. a..a LAND U..
.V".OL un
C OO.......G...~ .'.. ...
D .,...Q. . .... ....
I ~....y ....".T...... ....7 ..,..
..."W ~...... Wey".... .... ....
A ..aAga ..... ...
.a... lIgGoe
Th. I: i
~~~:;~ 1IIIIt
rnl r
j
't'.
~
..fl." .....,
.,,.,..
.,.... a..
I.. ... ~"D
CI
Z
Q,
c(
U
III
D
Z
c(
oJ
-.- ::~;'.~c;~y
BOVNTON
..
Z
\II
T~H E-a- _.
oJ
\II
BEACH ~
&a
Z
Q
~
:>>
a
w
II I.Q
H W
Ji ~
j!ll z
ulf ~
,!At
.
fJ
Th.
Mat:aral.
PI.nt:
SIt;.
.
c
.
U
L.a.ND
o -............w___ .
.._ AC....
~Ar:;K
a
OF CCMMERCE~
c(
By Rlteco Development Corp. ~
MAP H-'
--------------- -~---
~
.' . .
. .
00 0 00 0 0 00 0 0
dP 0
r-l Lt) Lt) 01""'- 00 0 I""'- 0'1 \0 r-l
N r-l N \0 r-l
z
l':l;
~
A4
I I I I I I I I I
0 qo 0 r-l MM r-l MOO\O 0'1 0'1
~
0 M r-- M M qo rl 0\0000 M 0'1
Z N M Lt) qo \0 Lt) q< q< M M
~ r-l rl M Lt)
~
Z
~l':l;
(J)~
OA4
OH
zO:: r-l 0'1 N N N 1.0 0
l':l;0 dP 0
.-i ~- Lt) M I""'- \0 Lt) 00 rl
l':l; N q< I""'- r-l
0
rilr.r..l':l;
~O_ I
l:OZZ Lf'l
l':l;Ol':l; I
8(J)~ Z
HA4 l':l;
0::0 ~
l':l;~ A4
A40 H
:;:Z
O~ 0:: 0\0 0'1 Or-- N qoooOO Lt) 0'1
U~ 0
- r-- 00 qo .-i \0 Lt) \0 En
l':l; N N If) r-l I""'- q< M
0 r-l N "::II Lt)
l':l;
~
(,9 OJ
l':l; U OJ
~ ro U
0:: 0.. ro
+I..-l U U) 0..
s:: 113 l':l; U)
OJ-r-i s:: OJ
6 ~ 0 OJ > H
0..+1 ~ 0.. H Q)
..-l o U) p. 0 Q).!::
ror-i ..-l;:J 0 - U)+I
s:: ro OJ '0 ~ U) OJ 0
O-r-i ..-l>S:: ~ '0 H
-r-i U ro Q)-r-i > s:: u.<<l
+lH -r-i '0 ~ ro
ro OJ H +I 0 rl \ll~
~ ~ +I<<l.c +I U) s:: H
U) tJ' ~ Q) '0 -r-i ro
..-l U 0 ;:J.!:: -r-i 0 ~ s::o..o..
ro Q) 0 'OU..-l U) ro
~ -.-1 H S::H ~ _ Q) rl '" >.
(J) U-H HroH l':l; u)~+lS::+I
0 l-I .n OJ OJ Q) OJ 8 Q) ro Q) ro-r-i (J)
Q);:J.!:: U +I U).c 0 ~~3(J)U U) ~
0 ~r-i+l -r-i ,!::Q).j..l 8 ro '0 l':l;
Z U 0 'H tJ'HO m ~ ro 8
l':l; 0 ~ -r-i 0 0 0
~ U 0 ~ (J) 0:: 8
:or ,.........;
j ~
t
~
.The location of commercial parcels along NW 22nd Avenue is
· a minor departure from the internal "Lakeside Center" complex
originally contemplated that indicated only 800 feet of com-
mercial frontage on NW 22nd Avenue The current plan, exclud-
ing the Club, now provides for 2,800 feet of commercial frontage
Based upon marketing requirements and the need to establish
strong restaurant and service retail locations within the Park,
the land-use has been specified accordingly From a traffic
viewpoint, it is justified by the reduction in trip generation
for the Park overall, as noted later in this report
Hotel uses have been noted as alternate uses for office use par-
cels located on both the eastern and western terminus of NW 22nd
Avenue Three such parcels have been noted accordingly This
concept is consistent with the approved ADA/DRI plan
Light industrial uses, including research and development activi-
ties, are to be located south of NW 22nd Avenue, along the Boynton
Beach Canal (C-16) and along High Ridge Road Light industrial
uses are also proposed to be located south of the Boynton Distri-
bution Center on High Ridge Road and south of the 40-acre sand
pine preserve area
Open space has increased substantially over the approved ADA/DRI
Plan from 82 2 acres to 144 9 acres Lakes are proposed to be
located in the low area of the Park Unlike the ADA/DRI approved
plan, however, these lakes will be arranged as linear open space/
wetland/lake areas The result is to provide greater visual ex-
posure to a far larger number of park sites. The reduced acres
of lakes (from 76 4 acres to 50 3 acres) is based upon new rules
by the South Florida Water Management District adopted in June
1984, and the fact that the plan contemplated 50 1 fewer acres of
developed land These new rules require less large size retention
lakes in each project On-site ponding will be part of these
rules Wetland preservation remains the same as approved in the
ADA/DRI Plan, except for a slight increase in wetland acreage
(from 5.8 acres to 6 0 acres).
The mitigation plan, submitted herewith, identifies the locations
of the lake-edge plantings as consistent with the approved ADA/DRI
In addition, the preservations of upland habitat and native vege-
tation is consistent with the approved ADA/DRI
One large 40-acre parcel of sand pine scrub and existing proposed
animal habitat area is proposed in the far northwest portion of the
Amended Plan This location and parcel configuration was decided
upon from several alternatives and following numerous meetings be-
tween Riteco, environmental planning consultants, and City/Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council staff, during 1985 Preserved in-
tact, the 40-acre site complies with requirements of the TCRPC Board
and staff, the City staff, and the adopted Development Order Ample
habitat land area exists to allow orderly and safe relocation of
existing Gopher Tortoise and Florida Mice Existing Burrowing Owl
sites all fall in northern portions of the preserve Fully consis-
tent with the Development Order, this proposed "Sand pine Preserve"
will be regenerated in accordance with the Sand Pine Preserve,
Hanagement Plan
-6-
-- -- --- --------------------_._._~-~---_..
0\
,.
, .
I
,
A proposed City Park will be located adjacent to the 40-acre
preserve This Park will provide a community level facility
and serve the growing residential neighborhoods to the north
and west Access for the Park and preserve area will be pro-
vided by a new loop arterial which connects Congress Avenue
(north of NW 22nd Avenue) with NW 22nd Avenue in the center
of the Park Future construction of Miner Road will provide
additional access
ROADWAY ALIGNMENT AND TRIP GENERATION
A network of major internal arterials (similar to the ADA/DRI
Approved Plan) is proposed to serve the Amended PIan land uses,
and avoid negative impact on the public transportation system
outside of the Park. Internal vehicular movement will be ac-
commodated by arterials, each with divided four-lane landscaped
boulevard roadways. Northwest 22nd Avenue and High Ridge Road
are similar in construction with a 100 foot right-of-way Miner
Road has a right-of-way of 108 feet, and will be constructed by
others, as adjacent sections of roadway and the canal crossing
become available
An internal system of pedestrian walkways and bikeways will be
provided throughout the linear open space system, connected by
grade-separated crossings as shown, at the arterial roadways
PROJECT TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS
In general, vehicle trip generation for the Amended Master
Development Plan is similar to the ADA/DRI Approved Master
Development Plan A comparison of the two is shown in Table
Two
The slight 5% reduction in total trip generation (from 44,321
in the ADA/DRI Plan to 42,957 in the Amended Plan) is the re-
sult of an increase in the open space categories of land use
and reduction of net developable land from 411 2 acres in the
ADA/DRI to 361 1 acres in the Amended Plan
INTERNAL/EXTERNAL SPLITS
There are also reductions in external trips A comparison of
internal/external trip generations is shown in Table Three
The 10% reduction in external trip generation is a result of
reductions in net developable land acreages
Traffic assignments of external trips to the impact area road-
way network remain unchanged from the ADA/DRI Plan External
peak-hour trips generated by the Park and their directional split
are also unchanged from the ADA/DRI Plan
-7-
.'
.,
(fl
0
[i ..:r \.0
\.0 0 \.0
p.. I- 0 0" \f'\ c--l
1-"'1 ~ c--l c--l ~ c--l
~ ~ ..:r ~ 0 c--l
4: r-< \.0
,...J c--l ~ ..:r
p.. 0,)
lJ)
o~
~.c
op.. (fl ~
~ ~ ..:r ,,-.. ~ \.0
~O,) 5 ~ ~
~c 0 lJ) I-
4:0 4: ~ e ~ 0" \.0
~ ~ ~ ~
0
0
..:r
(fl -...../
0
~
~ ~
,...J ~ 0 ..:r \.0
c::C.p.. I- 0 c--l ..:r ..:r
r-<l-'l 0" c--l \.0 ~ ~
o~ ~ ..:r
r-<r-< \f'\ ..:r 0
~~ ..... c--l ~ ..:r
04: ?
I-"'I,...J 0
r-<p.. "Cl
4: ,...1 ,
~o .,-1 (fl cO
~~ ? ~ ,
o~o ::0 ~
~~~ <.) (j;) ,,-.. 0" I-
r-<'-'~ c::C. ,...1
~ c--l lJ) (j;) ..:r
~p..4: e c--l I.f"I
,...JI-"'I- Q,) ~ ~ c--l
cO~~ lJ)
c::C.r-<c::C. ~ 0
r-< ,...J .c 0
op.. p.. ..:r
~ (fl -...../
r-<I-"'I 0
<.)~ lJ) ~
~o ~ ~ c--l
.-,- ~ 0 0 0 c--l
04: Q,) p.. \.0 0 \.0 0" ~
~o >- 1-"'1 0" ~ I- ~ 0
p..4'.. ~ cG ..
4:0 r-< ~ c--l \f'\ ..:r \.0
,...J...... ,...1
p..
1-"'1,...1
cG
~C) (fl
_lJ) ~
<(C':l cG
o~ <.) c--l ,,-.. \.0 0
4'..\~ 4'.. ,...1 ~ (j;)
lJ)
E
cG ,...1
~
0 .,-1
0 ~
,...1 c--l .....
C\1 -...../ lJ)
?
~ ,,-I "Cl
(fl (.) c (fl
? \-0 lJ) Q,) l-"'I
Q,) ,...1 0 .,.) ,.J
Cl E Q,) .,-1 fn <(
~ E ~ \.l.-I t-'
4'.. 0 0 ..... .r-! 0
,.-:. U :I: 0 ,...J t-'
\
---,--------
'"
.'
~
~
~ If' a ,-4 4 a
('f) ..D ,-4 0' a
f:-l N f"- ..D If' N
~ N N ..D cO a
,-4 ('f)
~
~
~ ,-4 a If' a ..D
4 4 cO ..D N
f:-l ~ 4 ..D f"- a
z ..
...... 4 ,-4 4 ,-4 N
~ ~
c1:
.-1
p.. (l) tf)
tJl C.
C.en ~
~.c ~
c.p.. ,..J ..D a ..D 4 ..D
~ <tp.. f"- a 0' If' N
\,zJ(l) f:-l...... ('f) N N ('f) N
Zc O~
<to f:-lf:-l ..D 4 ,-4 a N
N ,-4 4
~
tf)c1:
f:-l,..J
......p..
,..J
p..c.
tiltf)~ ,..J ,
til C. <t 0'
~.-1~ ~ ,
;:r.c1:t;:.) ~
f:-l~'Z. ~ If' a ('f) If' ('f)
~<t t-' ('f) ..D f"- ('f) a
~~- ~ If' f"- a a 4
,..Jt-'~ \,zJ ..
cO~c1: ,-4 N ..D .-< ,-4
<t\,zJ,..J .-< ...... ('f)
f:-l-p.. "0
,..J al
c1:...... C ,..J
~~ .~ <1:
~c. .0 ~
til- e ~ cO a ,-4 ,-4 a
f:-lc1: 0 ('f) 4 If' ,-4 4
~c. t.J t-' 4 4 If' ('f) f"-
......c1: ~
...... 4 ,-4 4 N N
N ,-4
c(l tf)
C.
......,-4 ~
~ ~
c.(l) ,..J ('f) a 4 ..D ('f)
_tJl c1:p.. f"- a N 4 4
<ten t-'...... 0' N ..D ('f) ,-4
c."c O~
.e(p.. t-'t-' If' 4 a ('f) 4
N .-< -4
.-<
en
.~
~
,-4 ...,
en tJl
~ .~ -B
l,./) u C
? ~ (l) ...... tf)
(l) ,-I u ..., ,..J
c. e (l) .~ fo c1:
~ e ..., ~ t-'
.e( 0 0 """' .,.{ 0
,..J t.J - 0 ,..J t-'
.....
- ._~--------'- ---------------
<,
),
· ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
" ~
.
.
Construction of the Amended Master Development P~an will result
in a 5% reduction in total trip generation, a l~% reduction of
external trip generation, and a reduction of tHe level of impact
on intersections and roadways within the project impact area
However, agreements reached between Riteco Incorporated, the
City, the County and TCRPC, as stated in the approved ADA/DRI
Development Order, will be honored by Deutsch/Ireland Properties
without change. Therefore, no change in the Development Order
is requested
In support of the data presented herein concerning trip generation
and splits, there is attached hereto a letter from Jim Zook at
Kimley-Horn with his computation of the revised traffic numbers
based upon this refined plan. His letter supports the fact that
there is no increase in traffic, despite the refinement of land
uses illustrated in the Amended Master Site Development Plan.
PHASING
The approved ADA/DRI speaks to an extended development period of
up to thirty years. Development was proposed in two phases. Our
proposed plan is to proceed with development of the entire project
in a single phase. Immediately following below are excerpts from
a marketing study prepared by Goodkin Research concerning the
absorption rate for this project and other major projects in the
area. Based upon their conclusions and the marketing intents of
Deutsch/Ireland Properties, it is believed that this entire develop-
ment can be accomplished in an eight to twelve year time frame.
On this basis, Deutsch/Ireland Properties has made the financial
commitment to move ahead immediately with all roadway and public
improvements construction Platting and subdivision will be sought
immediately upon approval of this Amended Master Site Development
Plan
ABSORPTION RATE
Based on the development's planned amenity mix and predicated on tha
hypothesis that our marketing recommendations outlined above will be baslca1l1
at:lhered to, th~ average annual absorption rate is expected to very from etl~roldmato;!ly
45 to 75 acres per year (see Table 2). Given about 379 net acres o! land, the expected
absorption period ranges Crom 5.1 to B." years, with !l d.3 year p:'obable timo;! span.
Tt.es~ absorption rates are measured in terms or land sales to both U!:ers &:\d other
developers/builders, and also include acreage occupied by buildings constructed by the
client/developer
G()odg(inuwJ~J[?(s{}a
-10-
"
, .
.
.
ABSORPTION RATES
Absorption or industrial land can best be mcasured by the ratc at which land Is
taken oct the market through land sales. This rate, however, docs not necessarily
reflect the rate ol building improvements as economic conditions and purchaser goals
have signiticant e!!ects. The annual absorption rate of the surveyed parks, as
measured by available land, ranges from less than 1 Acre to 55 acres. The most
common average annual absorption rate varies from about 2 to 5 acres In the parks
tlurveyed. The larger and better planned and located parks tend to reflcct the laster
absorption rate while smaller parks arc usually at the lower end ot thc range. Two
other (actors greatly ntlccting the absorption rate arc both the price and the
immediate availability ot tully improved sites.
Measured In terms ol the amount or land put to Industrial use (whiCh includes
existing buildings and facilities under coruitructlon), Arvlda's Park of Commerce hIlS
generated the most impressive absorption rate ot approximately 38 acres per year.
Goodkin~@)[J(SDu
-11-
, .
.,
.
.
Kim/ey.Horn and Associates, Inc. 5800 Corporate Way, West Palm Beach, Fla. 33407 · (305)683-5500
Raleigh, West Palm Beach, Tampa. Orlando. Nashville, Dallas
December 9, 1985
4479 06(07)/T06-22
Mr George Zimmerman
Deutsch-Ireland Properties
Suite 1106. International Building
2455 East Sunrise Boulevard
Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33304
RE: Boynton Beach Park of Commerce
Proposed Plan Revision
Traffic Impact
Dear George
As requested, by you, we have completed a comparison of your proposed revised
plan for the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce (second reVision)
As indicated on the attached summary, the traffic impact of this plan is virtually
the same as for the approved DRI plan. Differences due to road alignment changes
are noted on the summary
Also enclosed is our billing through October, 1985 Billing includes Task I of our
proposal and for a portion of work accomplished on Task II. The work on Task II was
initiated to meet your initial "fast track" schedule. Work was halted since we did not
receive a signed proposal
Billing for the enclosed summary will be under our current agreement (4479 06)
as requested
We have enjoyed working with you on this task Please let us know if you have
any questions regarding the enclosed summary or the billing
Very truly yours.
JRZ/nan
Attachments
Kl1tLEY-HORN AND ASSoz:..ATES. INC
~ ~ ?
/ .. James R Zook, P E
(--.~rinCIPal
f1
'...
cc Mimi Howard
'-
-12-
..
.
BOYNTON BBACl1 PARK OP COMMERCB UPDATB
. .
Preliminary Traffic Impact Assessment
And Site Plan Review Summary
\
TRAPPIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Proposed Plan
Approved Plan
Total Trips
External Trips
42,226
30,200 (72%)
44,143
31.403 (71 %)
Total External Peak Hour
5,130
5,331
DIFFER ENCES
Total Trips Proposed 42,226 096
= Approved 44,143 =
External Trips Proposed 30,200 096
= 31,403 =
Approved
External Peak Hour Proposed 5,130 o 96
= =
A ppro'..ed 5,33 I
NOTE
If 400 Room Hotel substltued (or II-acre Office External Peak Hour = 5,190
Proposed 5.190 _ 0 97
Approved 5.331 -
Generally projected 24-hour and peak hour assigned traffic volumes are the same Traffic
volumes Increase on Congress Avenue bet~cen Miner Road and NW 22nd Avenue due
to no connection to Miner Road within the \\C:itcrn half of the project There Is also
some Increase In directional sptlts due to the higher percentage of office trips
- f!
..,.;
12/10/85
447906(07)/T06-22
-13-
-------- - -----~----------
"
, PARCEL SIZES AND ORIENTATION
f
The Amended Site Development Plan is based upon a green space
network containing pedestrian ways and lakes. This concept is
a slight refinement from the ADA/DRI approved plan in that the
lakes and green space have become the focus for each of the
development parcels, rather than using the lakes and green space
as buffers between the roadways and development parcels. In
rearranging the plan in this fashion, we have been able to provide
this pedestrian amenity to the vast majority of parcels within the
development.
In the process of reorienting the specific parcels, we have moved
much further ahead towards the final definition of parcel size
The following paragraph excerpted from the original ADA/DRI
documents indicates an intention of developing parcels from a minimum
size of one and three quarter acres to a maximum size of nine acres.
The Amended Master Site Development Plan is fully consistent with
that intent.
A collector street, with a right-of-way of 60 feet, may be con-
structed between the Lakeside Center and adjoining
ofticelindustrial uses, it the market need for small sites dic-
tates its requirement. As shown on Map H, a typical industrial
lot may be 600 feet x 660 feet. These 9 acre sitoe may be
typically subdivided into 1.75, 2.25 or 4.5 acre tracts to meet
the need for smaller office or light industrial sites near tho
Lakeside Center.
PAGE 12-7
Immediately following are excerpts from reports prepared by our
marketing and sales consultants, Goodkin Research Corporation
and Cognetics, Inc. T~e,excerpts ~dentify o~r pot~nt~al market
and the sizes of facil~t~es most l~kely requ~red w~th~n our Park
Although this is not the exclusive rationale we have used,in
determining our final subdivision plan, the results of th1s
research provide the backbone for it
f1
....
-)4-
1-15
".,
INDUSTRIAL PARK DEVELOPMENT - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
t
Our analysis of the supply and demand determinants for warehouse a~d industrial
. ,
space indictites that these uses constitute attractive real estate investment
opportunities for the developer The demand for warehouse space is strong, and
although several new industrial parks are competing in the marketplace, the subjeet
property offers a elose-in and highly visible locution
Specific recommendations for this portion of the development follow:
High Tech R << D Facilities
In present day dollars, rental rates for high tech buildings should vary from about
$7 00 to $7 50 per square foot, absolute net Typically, these buildings will
eontain the following improvements:
18-24 foot clear ceiling heights
100 percent air-conditoned &ud fully sprinlJered for fire protection
22,400 ampere, three-phase electrical service
drive-up loading docks and drive-in doors
35,000 to 80,000 square foot buildings
2,500 to 5,000 square foot buys, or multiples thereof
parking fatio of one space per 275 ~o 325 square feet
Market segments typical of this fast-growing group include miero electronic
telecommunications equipment, medical electronics (e g., electronic health
monitorlllg systems); process control technologyj electronic surveillance systems
and other electronic components; computer systemsj engineering, research and
designj pharmaceutical/medical products and other related high tech groups.
These users require well landscaped si tes and attractively designed buildings.
- f1
- v
tI'-..l.f
~ , .~ (1
. '" ...--... - ~r] .
,., _)-~ .......fl'f. . -.. _ ~ v "'::;..1. ..-J
,<t)v ~.~ 10. ~.~ il ~[(~S~, ~(~U ~') Il
-15 _
f. ...'"
_.~-------~--~~ ------------
1-18
"
.QPFICE DEVELOPMENT - RECOMMHNDATIONS
Based on the above stlltisties, it is elear that the supply of offiee space in Palm
Beach County exceeds the demand In the face of this glut, in order to be suceessful,
developers will be compelled to be more cautious, sophisticated and innovative in their
planning, design, marketing and timing of new projects. While there is an imbalance in
supply and demand, the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce subject property is
nevertheless strategically positioned to enable it to eompete in various segments of
the office market. However, in order to generate acceptable absorption rates, it is
recommended that a differentiated marketing strategy be adopted by offering three
basic product lines:
o Pure office space
o Office/Service
o Office/High tech buildings
Pure OCCice Space
We feel that the subject property is suitably positioned to enable it to
suecessfully capture a portion of the demand for luxury-type office space originating
from such tenants as finaneial institutions, insurance companies, computer companies,
regional headquarters, operations centers, and professionals seeking prestigious
locations (e g., major law firms and aceounting firms) In Broward County, the
Corporate Park at Cypress Creek has bcen very successful in attracting these
relatively large eompanies. These firms are already well entrenched in the Boca
Raton market
{-J
\."
~....-",,:
,'" --.... - -- C",-,. ,~I
,.... ,.'"" i .~. ,c>.....,(.J ~";::'I ;Jl'-'
~J '.....i ~4 ;.~Jj ";[?~O\.~l~.Jj .~ J
-16-
,"-~,.
'\ j'
................ .1:...."'.,/
~-----_.
---- -------~ ---
1-19
.,
.
Our analysis of the erlteria ailccting the location decisions of corporate and
.
, ,
regional/divisional headquarters shows that the availability of highway and air
transportation are ranked as the two outstanding features, closely followed by the
availability of professional/executive labor In this respect, the site ranks highly
Pertaining to the luxury office market component of the development, the
following recommendations are made:
Rental Rates - In present-day dollars, the recommended base rent is $14 to $16
per square foot, absolute net.
Size of Buildings - In order to be able to capture some of these larger tenants,
buildings should be fairly large, varying in size from apFoximately 65,000 to
11 0,000 square feet.
Building Height - BUlldmg heights can vary from about one to six stories, with
two to five floors probably being most common
Office/Service Space and Moderately Priced OfCice Space
It is recommended that the developer adopt a penetration pricing strategy by
also ofCering office/service space and moderately priced pure office space at highly
competitive prices to the lI1urket segments in9icated below These target groups are
searching for excellent "value" at locations which offer good visibility, a convenient
road transportation network, and a neurby labor pool und local market. Our overall
experience with office/sel'vice projects in South Florida clearly demonstrates the
popularity of this concept when pl'iCC::i are very competitive Those projects with
relatively l1i~h rental rates huve expcrlt~nced difficulties leasing space even when site
exposure is excellent The ::>ubjcct property clearly offers an environment that is
conducive to our recommended stl'utegy, especially in light of current market
condi lions
.. f1
- ~ '...,
-17-
.~'.... -, 11
,e. ,~', . .t" . ["'1 v' ,I !, - .'t1 I
~ _~ ;.. 1.-1: ''1 ;,~ ~ L.J' L. ; l.. I \ \. I
..~ ",,-' ......../' .....__ .. ..;... d ... J ~~lc...J, _J -^_ J ~-' I
1-2~1
"
.
.COMMERCIAI~ DEVELOPMENT
.
Interviews with representutives and empluyees of maJor organizations and
various office and industrial parks in Florida, show strong preferences to work in self-
contained developments that offer the necessary supporting commercial/retail and
other personul services, including such uses us:
Restaurants
Personal services (e.g dry cleanel', huirdresser, beauty shop)
Stationery/book store
Gift/cigar shop
Convenience store
Pharmacy
Full service print shop
Travel agent
Messenger/courier service
Car rental agency
Camera shop/developing
Although these uses would cuter chiefly to employees of the park and other
surrounding commercial developments, some demand would also emanate from
surrounding residential communities. It is important that the restaurants and other
retail facilities be positioned in the subject purk in a munner that maximizes exposure
to passing traffic
HOTEL DEVELOPMENT
A t present, there is only one hotel cl1uin fronting 1-95 in Boynton Beach - an
unattractive Holiday Inn ut the intersection of 1-95 and Boynton Beach Road. Given
f1
\.i
-18-
I-~, .~: (.-/' ~~. .. ,~: 1 Jf~3~~ ~CJl1\~n I I
1-24
.,
.U,e impressive growth of industrial, cOllllnerclt.il, retail and residential developments in
.
the surrounding area (especially as cAelopl1fl\~d by Motorola and the Boynton Beach
MaU), we feel that the prOpel"ty offers a good location for one or two quality hotel
franchises that can be phased to support up to 500 rooms.
A hotel would eleal"ly complement the overall amenity mix of the development
and derive most of its revenue from such patronage sources as business guests,
meetings and small seminars, potential residents in the area, and, to a lesser degree,
social/tourists requiring a short stOP-OVC1' in a quality, easily accessible and highly
visible loeation. The strategy of adding hotel establishments during the later phases of
major office/business park developments is fuirly common, as exemplified by such
successful South Florida projects as Arvida Pbrk of Commerce, Corporate Park at
Cypress Creek and Hillsboro Executive Center
f1
-~v
-19-
..
.,J' ./
r' ~ - l -;:.- - -~ I Jlr l--
. .nl rt ~<t:)i ,~/(c: II (\ 1..- J J
~. .\. .... .. tot l.o U ~A':'" -.::J -...U :J
(".....ft
.~
;......
1-25
.
LOT SIZES AND LAND PRICES
, f
.
.
According to the preliminary Master Plan of the Boynton Beach Park of
Commerce, the park is divided into large 10~ acre lots Our eompetitive survey shows
that with the exception of Arvida Park of Commerce's 5: acre traets, most
competitors offer one to two acre tracts, reOeeting strong demand by relatively small
users. While we feel there is a need for large tracts (and our projected absorption
rates assume that the developer will be able to attract several large occupants), it is
important that the developer is also able to satisfy the demand by potential occupants
requiring minimum lot sizes of roughly 1 25 acres. In order to achieve the marketing
flexibility required in a project of this size, it is strongly recommended that the land
plan be amended to meet the needs of these Inar"'et segments. It is advisable to plat
relatively small and combine lots, as opposed to platting mainly large tracts as this
eould present more of a problem when trying to split In this respect, it is also
important to realize that, in general, smaller parcels tend to generate higher prices
per square foot than larger ones.
Depending upon such factors as size of parcel, location within the park,
finaneing, type of buyer/user, the recommended land priee in present-day dollars
varies from approximately $6 50 to $12 00 per square foot with an average of $8 25
per square foot. These prices are somewhtlt lower than those currently being quoted
at Arvida Park of Commeree, and roughly in line with Ilillsboro Executive Center and
Corporate Park at Cypress Creek. Given the outstanding amenity mix planned for the
development (e g., golf course, day cat'e center, meeting/conference facilities, health
club, restaurants/retail services), we feel that these prices are realistic and offer
potential oecupants exeellent "value"l
-... --------- - ---- - - -- .----- ---... -.. ------- --...... - -- --...... - --- --
1
If an interchange is bUilt at 1-95 and N W 22nd Avenue, land prices at some of
the parcels could increase by as much us 10 to 20 percent
f1
v
ir"/
.
,~ ,,:., \ ('~ r~[ff;:;)0 V~j.[j) :0'-1
.~ ,(, I...., Go I C \ L I
_." .,.../..... ..... ,. .... ~.. ~ ,-_J ..::.J'..... ....] .J l
-20-
~ ~ -
----~--~-----_._--_..--
.
t"
[, - 1 PRO P f R TIE S
Palm Beach Co.
SU~MARY OF GROWTH TkE~DS
The Palm Reach Co. economy performed better than the U.S. economy
during the lq10's ard early lq80's. wni Ie the US grew by 28 percent
during the lq12-82 perioe as a whole, Palm Beach Co. grew q7 percent.
Palm Beach Co. tended to reflect the general pattern of cycl ical
change exp~rienced nationwide:
Compound Annual Growth Ra te
Period U.S. Pain; Beach Co. Difference
lq12-76 1.8 5.6 3.8
lq16-80 4.5 q.1 5.2
lQ80-82 -.4 5.4 5.8
lQ82-85 2.5 8.1 5.6
Palm Beach Co. did better than the U.S. as a whole during the
major growth periOd In lQ76-80, and again during th~ lQaO-82 recession.
The biggest contributors to the Palm Beach Co. jab base during the
lQ12-82 periOd were
~~.s;152L.
~~l_tl~~_l52~~_'t~al~g
11765
6QQ3
6650
5981
4424
4250
3122
3582
3442
3331
Eating E Drinking Places
Health Services
Special Trade Contractors
Business Services
Real Estate
Transportation Eqpt.
General Contractors
Electric E Electronjc EQpt.
Food Stores
Misc. Retail Trade
- n
- v
-21-
.
Economic Change
, .
"
The least effectl ve contr ibutors have been:
S.~~1~t.
Heavy Construction
TE''lCt lie Manufactur ing
Ston~,Clay,Glass Proaucts
Co~bin~d Investments
011 l: Coal Products "1t9.
Forestry
Tobacco Products Mfg.
Pipel ines
~ailroads
Coal E Lignite Mining
~~l_~~~_l~~~_~L~alA~
-553
-150
-43
-34
-34
-25
o
o
o
o
~2~t~~1_2L_tl~1_J~~_~t2~ln
It is Important to know which kinds of companies, on balance, are
creatlnq net new jobs. By "on balance" we mean the net of new startups
and expansions and relocations into Palm beach Co. over the losses due
to Closings, layoffs, and out-moves. We determine the net change by
examining the behavior of each Indlvl dual tuslness In the area, netting
the gains against the losses as we go.
a~_s.l~:
In Palm Reach Co.. small companies were the greatest net jab
creators during the period for whiCh the most recent micro detail Is
available (1980-84):
Percent Net
f1I!~1!2~!!!:!l1_.s1z: ~~!_l!2b~_'-~al~~ .J!2~__'.ba.cg~
0-19 19408 b9.8 7-
20-9 q b990 23.1
100-499 3260 15.9
500+ 9064 24.1
Unknown l541 120.5
---------------- ------------
TOTALS 40304 34.5
(:
'-'
-22-
Economic Ctange
-"
.
'..
a~_I~~t_~!_Q~O~t1Qi~
Palm Reach Co. relies most heavi Iy upon local
its growth:
Independents tor
Q~n~~~hl~ tl~1_lQ~1_'t~al:g
Percent Net
1~~__~tliU19~
Independent 22970
3b.4 i.
~ubsidiary 131
2.0
Local Headquarters 10313
bb.2
Branch (Local He) -2891
-37.0
Branch (Non-local HO)
97QO
40.Q
T CT AL S
40313
34.5
a~_Ag~
Among establishments with an Identifiable age, young companies
Indicated the fastest rate of jOb gain:
Percent Net
A.9~ ~~l_l~~~_~t:al~~ 12~__~tJaOg:
0-4 39630 172.9 %
5-8 -32bO -17.9
q-ll -1542 -16.6
12+ -1414 -4.1
Unk n own 689Q 21.7
-----~---------- ------------
TOTALS 40313 34.5
"- f1
- \..
-23-
Economic Change
.
.
.. a~:~2r~2tal~_!~11~il~-~~~~lug-~h~Og~
The I a r 9 est sou r ceo f jOb C rea t ion (f r om a n act I v It y s ta n d po In t )
was startups ("birthS"). On the negative side, closures ("deaths")
player1 the most significant economic role. Looking at the net, we find
the greatest level of Imbalance between startups and closures, ana
therefore the ~Ighest rate of employment gain:
Percent Net
C!larHl!:_ft2~!:~~ ~~i_J2~~_~r~21~~ 12~l_~r~~1~~
Startup - Closure 1 qf: 2 8 48.7 %
Expand Contract 15570 38.6
Ir'lmove Outmove 5115 12.7
---------------- ------------
TOTALS 40313 100.0
~alYt~_21_Ea~1~1~_~r2~lQg_'2m~aQi~~
Net jOb creation figures tel I us a great deal about where the
economy Is healthy, but they do not tell us which Individual companies
are growing. It could be that there are many healthy firms in an
Industry that is declining. It thus pays to look at the nature of
growing companies ~~L ~!:.
What do we mean by "growing?" Is It absolute or Is it percent
growth? Absolute growth favors larger companies; percent growth favors
smaller ones. We have avoided these biases by choosing a hybrla
mixturE' of the two: absolute employment growth multiplied by the
percentage growth it represents (expressed in decimal terms). Thus a
company that grew from 500 to 550 employees would have an absolute
growth of ~O, a percent growth of 50/500 a.1, and an Index of 50 X .1 ·
5. We have chosen to examine the characteristics of al I very rapidly
growing establishments I.e., all of those with a growth Index at
o v e r 20 -- k e e pin g t r a c k 0 f the Ire h a r act e r 1st I c s, i nth e mea n t i me.
f;
\.i
-24-
[conomic Change
.J
.
, .
~lz~
The greatest number of rapidly growing establishments are small:
No. Rapidly Per c en t of
Err.p I oyment Growing Rapidly Growing
.s.lz~______ f.~lg~ll~h!!!~!ll~ .f~l~~ll~h!!!.t!ll~
0-19 202 61.8 %
20-99 63 19.3
100-499 21 8.3
500+ 30 9.2
Unknown 5 1.5
-------------- -------------
TOTALS 327 100.0
QltD~t~bi~
In terms of ownerShip status. local
largest number of high-growers
Independents represent the
No. Rapidly Percent of
Growing Rapidly Growing
!hm~t~hll2 E~liltli~hm~!ll~ f~l.a~ll~hl!!~!ll~
Independp.nt Fir m 222 67.9 %
Subsidiary 8 2.4
Headquarters of Fir m 60 18.3
Branch of Local Firm 9 2.8
Branch of Non-local Firm 28 8.6
-------------- --------------
TOT A L S 327 100.0
f1
v
-25-
...
, ,
, ,
,
tg~
,
fCO'"lornic Ch~nge
The largest proportion of growing establishments are young in age:
No. RapidlY Percent of
GrowinQ Rapidly Growing
A2~_iln_:!.~~L~1 ~~1~!211~Ul!l~!l1~ ~~1~211~!l!!l~1l1~
0-4 124 37.9 /.
5-8 76 23.2
9-11 26 8.0
12+ bit 19.6
Unk n own 37 11.3
-------------- --------------
TOT A L S 327 100.0
f1
'-'
-26-
>>'
..,
.
, .
CONCLUSION
We look forward to the expeditious approval of this Amended
Master Site Development Plan. We feel it is the appropriate
refinement of the document initially approved in the ADA/DRI
and contemplated by the Development Order. Many of the
revisions that have taken place have resulted from the incorp-
oration of requirements expressed in the Development Order. We
look forward to the opportunity to present this project at the
City Council Public Hearing and look forward to its successful
completion.
f1
~
-27-
EXHIBIT "e"
"
.
I '
DEUTSCH I I IRELAl\TD
PROPERTIES
- ---- ---~
.,.-. IU~L" TO ro'" u.UOJ:lltDALI O,.,ICC
I. ____ -..:--/
-- ......-- - _.
'"'^I"'
JJO
February 28, 1986
PL...
.: L-?T.
Hr. Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
120 N E. 2nd Avenue
P. 0 Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
RE Response to questions of the TRB reviewed in our meeting on February 18,
1986.
Dear Carmen:
In response to the questions raised In the attached memoranda, I am providing
you herewith our responses for the record. Memorandum #1 dated February
12, 1986, from Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director
ITEM 1 The Proponent stil I wishes to proceed with consideration of the
commercial sites as shown on their submitted Master Development Plan
Although we recognize your concern, we maintain a great deal of concern
ourselves that the parcels be able to support the highest caliber of
corrmercfal uses
ITEM 2 The question, with respect to a central loading and unloading
facility for rail service, the Proponent has reviewed such a proposal with a
number of rail users and have found it to be inappropriate AI I potential
users require direct siding access to their facility
ITEM 3 The Master Development Plan is presented in full accordance with
the PID Zoning Ordinance. We intend to provide all of the required greenbelt
buffers adjacent to properties having a different zoning classification, in
complete compliance with the Code
ITEH 4 The rights-of-way for all interior roadways wi I I be 100 feet wide
Since we will be proposing some variations on the basic sidewalk/bike path
scheme, we wil I provide complete detail for review during the platting
process Again, we expect to provide the City with pavement sections.
landscaping and pedestrian amenities in excess of Code requirements. The - D
typical roadway section will have two twenty-four foot wide roadways with a
sixteen foot wide landscaped median
SUITE 1I000INTERNATlONAL BUILDING-2455 E. SUNRISE BOULEVARD-FORT LAUDERDALE. FLORIDA 33304. (3051564-5\14
THE I'lUILDING . 1125 NORTHEAST 125 STREET NORTH MIAMI, FLuRIDA 33161. (305) 891-6808
.C'~" .&TCf: DCf"'III:'.J CC.1' T'"V' ..."...1.\ ~C"C. T r'-nD "IT" r".'cTD..,.....''''''... ,..~"
".,
j.
.
ITEM 5 The schedule for the Environmental Impact Analysls phase of the
Interchange construction has been presented at the meeting, and a copy is
attached hereto for your further review We expect to execute the contract
with Klmley-Horn, our consultant, on or about March 4
Memorandum #2 dated February 12, 1986. from Perry A. Cessna. Dlrector of
Ut i J it i es .
ITEM A is comentary on water distributIon.
ITEM 1: We hereby agree to loop the water mains as requested at the cul-de-
sacs.
ITEM 2: The relocation of the water main routing to the HIgh Ridge Road
rIght-of-way and the additional routing along the north sIde of the canal is
agreed to Final plans will be prepared in accordance therewith
ITEM 3: At this initial phase. we will agree to a 1.000 foot maximum
distance between lIne valves; however. we expect to review this plan in more
detail with the City during the plattIng phases. When 1.000 foot spacing wIll
provide for fewer than four utility connections. we feel it is appropriate
that the spacing be increased.
ITEM 4: We hereby agree to add an additional ten Inch gate valve where
requested
ITEM 5 With respect to easements required for water and sewer. we hereby
request that ten foot wide easements be approved where installation occurs
outside of dedicated right-of-way In these instances, we will provide for a
ten foot building setback from an easement. thereby providing for a thirty
foot clear path at utility lines We also ask that the I imitation on
landscaping be imposed only within the ten foot wIde easement area. With
respect to landscaping at the right-of-way and adjacent to such easement
areas. we will endeavor to utilize the plant materials as recommended by the
City Forester, Kevin J Hallahan. in his memorandum dated February 20. 1986
ITEM 6 With respect to fire flow. the Proponent hereby agrees that no
building will be certified for occupancy without proper fire flow Since fire
flow is a question of use. the Proponent agrees to work out an appropriate
formula with the building department to establish required fire flow needs for
projects at the time of permitting Since to the extent feasible. al I publ ic
improvements will be made at the same time. it is felt that the water loops
will be connected prior to occupancy for the vast majority of situations
ITEM B
Sewage collection and transmission
h
\.i
ITEM I: Again. this item reters to easements being provided and the
proponent agrees to provide such easements at a width of ten feet with a
building setback requirement of an additional ten feet
--~--- -~--- -~
---~--- --------~-
'.
.
. '
.
-
;J.
.
ITEM 2: Parcels W2-0 through W5-0 will be served by a sewer along the
north side of Northwest 22nd Avenue Parcels W19-0 and W20-0 respectively
will be served by an extension of the two sewers shown to the north
ITEM C Proponent will work with the City as required to insure that
inspection of utility installation can be accompl ished in a timely manner
The funds necessary to accomplish this task will be examined and determined at
a later date.
Memorandum #3 from Charles C. Frederick, Director of Recreation and Park
Department also dated February 12, 1986.
ITEM 1 Land exchange proposal The Proponent wishes to keep this matter
separate from discussions concerning the Master Plan layout. The negotiations
are continuing between Mr. Peter Cheney, the City Manager and the Proponent to
work out the details of such a land exchange
ITEM 2: Median and right-of-way maintenance The Proponent has determined
at this time that the rights-oF-way. other than Northwest 22nd Avenue and High
Ridge Road. will be privately held Since dedication is not contemplated,
maintenance of those areas wi I I be taken care of by the Developer and the
succeeding Property Owner's Association Maintenance of Northwest 22nd Avenue
and High Ridge Road rights-of-way is also of concern to the Proponent. and
the Proponent is eager to establish a means whereby they can assume control
and responsibility for such maintenance
Memorandum from John Wildner, Park Superintendent dated February 12. 1986.
This memorandum provides the backup for cost estimates concerning right-of-way
maintenance. I believe all of the questions raised therein have been
addressed in the previous comentary
The next memorandum is From Lieutenant McGarry of the Police Department dated
February 11, 1986
In order to provide further information to the Police Department in response
to Lieutenant McGarry's questions, a meeting was held with Lieutenant Hammock,
Chief Hillary and other members of the Boynton Beach Pol ice Department and Jim
Zook of Kimley-Horn and 1 In that meeting, details of the proposed High
Ridge Road relocation were discussed Peak hour traFfic movements were
identified at 1,300 cars per hour The interchange spacing between the
proposed 1-95 Interchange and High Ridge Road would be in excess of 800 feet.
center to center This distance more than adequately meets the DOT 660 foot
separation criteria The police Department felt adequately assured that an
acceptable roadway and interchange design could be developed within these
distance perimeters Final design and pavement layout wi I I be accomplished
during the platting and roadway engineering phases scheduled to fol low
irrvnediately
-_.--_._--_._--_._~._------------_.~
...
~.
~
~
..
With respect to the ability to obtain vacation of the DOT right-of-way for
HIgh Ridge Road. Jim Zook of Kimley-Horn met with Frank Gordon. Design
EngIneer of the Florida Department of TransportatIon on Thursday afternoon.
February 27. During that meetIng. Hr -Gordon indicated that DOT would
approach the vacation of High Ridge Road in accordance with their typical
vacation procedure He indicated that It did not appear as if that portion of
HIgh Ridge Road was a part of the DOT network. and as such. there should not
be any major difficulty in obtaining vacation. He did, however. reserve
final Judgement on the roadway operations and easement vacation until such
tfme as the roadway desfgn was complete.
I believe this responds to al I areas of concern. If you have any further
questions, please contact me
GZ ak
CC Mr Thomas K Ireland
Hr. Edward B Deutsch
Hr Thomas P. Hisuraca
Hr. Rick Rossi
Hr James ZOOk
Hs Mimi Howard
David Pressly, Esquire
Hr. Richard Kerber
Attachments
<f~ ~ )
. r. > .) · .. r
/ .
09~tj86-4
0151D
ORD INANCE NO &6- c:87
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
DETERMINING THAT CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE
DEVELOPi1ENT OF REGIONAL HIPACT APPROVED IN
ORDINANCE NO 84-51, AND AMENDED IN ORDINANCE
NO 86-11, DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL
DEVIATION UNDER CHAPTER 380, FLORIDA STATUTES,
1986, DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF
REGIONAL Il1PACT REVIEH IS NECESSARY REG~NG
SUCH CUANGES, APPROVING SUCH CHANGES, AND
Al1END HJG THE DEVELOl'r-1ENT ORDER (ORD INANCE NOS
84- 51 and 86-11) FOR PURPOSES OF INCORPORATING
THE APPROVED CHANGES
WHEREAS, Riteco Development Corporation, a Florida corporation
("Riteco") filed with the City of Boynton Beach (the "City") an
Application for Development Approval of Comprehensi ve Development
of Regional Impact (the "ADA") on May 21, 1984, regarding that
certain property (the "property") described in Exhibi t "A,"
attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
t
WHEREAS, the ADA was approved and the Development Order for
the Property was granted December 18, 1984 pursuant to Ordinance
No 84-51 (the "Development Order"); and
WHEREAS, Riteco subsequently conveyed its right, title and
interest in and to the Property to Boynton Park of Commerce, Inc ,
a Florida corporation ("Boynton Park"), and, Boynton Park, in
turn, subsequently conveyed its right, title, and interest in and
to
the
Property
to Quantum Assoc i a tes,
a Florida general
partnership (the "Developer"), the current record fee simple owner
of the Property; and
WHEREAS, Developer filed with the City an application to amend
the Development Order, which application was approved by the City
in Ordinance No. 86-11; and
WHEREAS, the term "Development Order" includes all amendments
thereto; and
WHEREAS, Developer has filed with the City another application
to amend the Development Order; and
WHEREAS, tone Cit- / Council of aoynton Beach, as the governing
.
body haJing jurisdict-ion, is authorized and empowered to consider
,.
-;$~ ~
(~~ ..\
\\ '.
. )
.\ apFnications
for arilendments
t-o development-
orders
approving
development-s of regional impact pursuant to Chapter 380, ?lorida
Statutes (1986), and
WHEREAS, upon publication and furnishing of due not-ice, public
hearings on these proceedings were held August 12, 1986, before
the Planning and Zoning Board, and September 4, 1986 before the
City Council of Boynton Beach; and
--".
,
WHEREAS, the said City Council has considered the testimony,
reports and otherlo-:umentary evidence submitted at said public
hearings by Developer, the Boynton Beach staff, the Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Board, and the publ~c; and
WHEREAS, said City Council has considered all of the foregoing
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of 30ynton
Beach, that said City Council makes the following findings of fact
Section 1.
A notice of public hearing in the proceedings was
duly published on
April 6..,
Post,
a
1986,
in The
newspaper of general circulation in Boynton Beach,
Florida,
pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and proof of said
publication has been duly filed in these proceedings
Section 2
Developer has requested that the Development Order
be amended as follows
A That the name of the development be changed to Quantum
Park At Boynton Beach.
B That the Amended -laster Site Development ?lan (".:"mended
Master Site Development Plan"), attached hereto as Exnicit "3" and
made a part hereof, submitted by Applicant in its application for
Amendment to the Development Order replace and supercede the
Master Site Development Plan currently approved in the Development
Order
C. That Section 4(1) be amended by addlng the following
SUbparagraph (d)
(d) Quantum Park At-
Amended Master Sit-e
submltted Juli 7, 1986
Boynton Beach
Development-
ADA
Plan
D
That
references
t-hroughout
t- he
Development
Order
be
revised to conform to the Amended Master Site Development Plan
0151D
-2-
I.
'---
~ ~, .\
II
" . .
. .
, E That references
-,
revised, .,vhe re applicable,
throughout
the
Development
Order
be
to conform to the Memorandum from
R Thomas Powers (Goodkin Research Corporation) to Ed Deutsch under
date of July 3, 1986, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit
"C", and t-he Traffic Analysis Update prepared by Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc
under date of July 3, 1986, a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "D"
--;--
Section 3
Upon consideration of all matters described in
Section 380, Florida Statutes (1986), it is hereby determined that
A The amendments proposed by Developer do not unreasonably
interfere with the achievement of the objectives of an adopted
state land development plan applicable to the area
B The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with
the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations
C The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with
the recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
on file in these proceedings
D The amendments proposed by Developer do not constitute a
substantial deviation under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes (1986)
E The amendments proposed by Developer do not require
further development of regional impact review
Section 4
The City Council has concluded as a matter of law
that these proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to the
provisions or Chapter 380, Florida Stat-utes (1986), that Developer
is entitled to the relief prayed and applied for,
and the
Development Order is hereby amended incorporatlng the amendments
proposed by Developer as set forth in Section 2 above
Section 5
Except as other~ise amended herein, the Development
Order shall remain in full force and effect
Sect ion 6.
A copy of this Ordinance shall ;)e transmitted by
first class U S
,1ail, certified return receipt requested, to the
Bureau of Land and Hater '.1anager.lent, t-he Depart"inent of Community
Affairs, Quantum Associates (rhe owner/developer), and the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council
0151D
-)-
l.
.., 'I
~ '
I
,. . .
. .
-, ,. Section 7
This Ordinance shall become effective lmmediate1y
upon passage
FIRST READLIG this 7rL day of ~,~hp II-, 1986
SECOND READI~lG and FINAL PASSAGE this c:21..;;/ day of &1oiJer
,
1986
CITY OF BOY~TON B~, FLORIDA
,
1/, ~ L (/, /1/; tr/{Ie..
l1A'YOR
~~E~~ f
/ - )
I ~ /' (./ /{
,. /, /": - / c' ( (. (/
COUNCIL HEl'1BER /
./
EXHIBITS
"A" - Legal Description
"B" - Amended Master Site Development Plan
"C" - ~emorandum from R Thomas Powers
"D" - ~raffic Analysls Update
0151D
-4-
,
l.
/.,
, !\ .
.. .
-,
E \ lIDIT "J\"
(J~i:l~
I'
eo.
. .
/"
r
..
OVE:\l\LL DOU'lD \R[
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
.
.
A Tract of land lying partially in Sections 16, 17, 20 and 21, Tow~ship
45 South,.Range 43 East, Pal~ Beach County, Florida, said Tract-belng
more part~cu~arly described as follows Commencj,ng at the South.....est
c:>rner of sa~d Section 17; thence North 1.14"39" E.:lst,~ng the Hest.
~~ne of S:ct~or 17, a distance of 1318.10 feet to a point in the
~ntersact~on w_th the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue, as recorded i,
O.R. B.Jok 1738, Page -1686, of the Public Records of palra Be2.c'1 Count.!,
Florida~ the~ce with a bearing of ~orth 89001'32" East, along the
center11ne c:: N.~'l. 22nd Avenue, a distance of 778.37 feet to the PO_Dt
of Beginning, thence North 1044'39" East, a distance of 1247 06 feet to
the South ris~t of way line of L W.D.D. Lateral 21, thence Nort~
89008~49" East, along the South right of way line of L.W.D.D.
Lateral 21, as recorded in O.R. Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public
Records of ?al~ oeach County, Florida, a distance of 635.93 feet to the
centerline of the L.VI.D.D. Equalizing Canal E-4 Canal, as recorded in
O.R. Book 1732r Page 612 of Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida; the~ce along the centerline of the above described E-4 Canal
with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of North 10032'52>>
~~East, a radius of 750.00 feetr a central angle of 4004'17", and an arc
~ ,length of 53.29 feet; thence continue along the centerline of the E-4
'~:Canal, with a bearing of North 12035'00" Eastr a distance of 320.69 feet -.
r to a point of C~~Je; thence with a curver to the left having a radius of
.. 6500.00, a ce~=al angle of 3028'jO"', and an arc length of 394.23 feet~ .'
:{~.;:thence North 9006130" Eastr a distance of 1979.16 feet to a point on the ......."
~ North Line of Section 17~ thence with a bearing of North 89016'39" East,
~ ~along the No=th line of Section 17r a distance of 1964.50 feet, thence
South 0002111" East, a distance of 2625.18 feet; thence Nort" 89008'49"
E~st, a distar.ce of 368.96 feet to a point on the North right of way
line ofr1.N. 2~::d-AJenue~as recorded in G.R. Book 1738, Page 1686 of the
Public Records a:: Pal:il Beach COU'1t./, Flor~da, thence South 19027'31"
East, a distance of 50.00 feet to t~e centerline of N.~. 22nd A~enue;
thence wi th a =U::--,,'~ to the rig ~ t. hav lng a chord bear ing- of No:-t'1
75029'49" Eas-=, a radius of 1637 02 feet, a central angle of 9053'53",
and an arc le-g-=~ of 282.85 feet to a ~o~nt, thence North 12002'41"
East, a distance of 915.72 feet. thence North 0031 '11" East, a dista,ce
6f:399.7,0 feet; thence t,orth 89012'37" East, a dist2.nce of 413.21 feet~ _.i:-;~.-
" t,ence Sout.h 33222'55" East, a dista'"lce of 1349.70 feet to a pOlnt. 0'
t~e ~~st rig~t of waf line of t~e Seaboard Coastline Railroad, thence
south 0028'21" East., alo~g t~e ~est r_s~t. of waf li,e or t~e qallro~d, a
distance of 1309.09 feet to a ~Ol't on t~e centerline of N.~. 22,d
l", th .-,",,-,,~ "8027'....1" es'" ,,',....-~ """0 cnntn....' ,no 0;: 'T - 2""~d '
n V e n u e I .. e '1 C e ..' v _ _. 0 ..:) f '-, c.;. - ...., '-j I... - - 1 \.; .. ...:.. -. .. .. - J.. 1.'~ I 4 . ..
Ave-we a dista-ce of 672.97 feet tke,ce Sout.h 0033'53" East, a distance
of 1306.69 fee~; thence South 830..5'31" East, a distance of 33351 feet
to a point on t,e ~est rig"t of way of t~e Seaboard Coastline Railroad,
the n c e wit, a = ear i n g 0 f Sou t, 1 4 . 0 (3 · 2 3 II \; est., a Ion 9 the \.,. est rig h t 0 f
way of the railroad, a distance 0: 1J12.~9 feet, thence Sout'1 0033'53"
East a dist.::.nce of 25.69 feet, tkerc~ Sout, 13015'22" \;est, a distance
of 9:2 0 . 57 fee:.; t ~ e n c e !' 0 r t" 8 8 0 5 0 ' 0 .," \, e s r., a d is t em ceo f 1 37 60 fee t ; "
thence .....ith a bearing of ~:ort~ 0..,9'21" ..est., a di~t.:lnce of 200.00 feet;
thence Nort~ aa050'O~" West, ~ dis~ance of 218.00 feet, t~ence South
o · 4 9 ' 2 1" E as':, a d i s t a i1 ceo f 2 0 0 0 0 f ~ e t, the n c e ~ Tor t ~ 8 S 0 50 ' 0 .. II \'. est, a
. ~ on f .. t~oncn c"\"-..... o. Q'''''l'' E]~" , d'c-..'....c ~ 5-~
d 1 S t (J nee 0.;... ~ o. \.: C e ~ , '"- - - -' ~. - . ""1 -..... Co.. -'....., U .A. oJ L '- t t eo..... ::> 0 . a 4
. 8 S 0 - a · 0 ." r ~ S .. => c.,.......,.... f no" ] r: 1 7 .., r t- .....
f~et, thence ,ort'1 :; .., ,~<.o ,"" ~ 4.~"'_"'-_ ... v ~:J ee~...o Ll po~nt
~ "h~ ~h~,("> G~CC- c~ cnn-nr11....n OF tkO ~ C 1
on tke cen~e:-__ne 0.. ... ''= c.;.-.J...-"_ -~ --~ ~ - ---..... ,,- ~ '1- ...-', .:lnLl,
F" . 501:1'1" (">C"t d -
the n c ~ w i ~ ~ 2. !:J e Co r ~ .... go.. 0 r ~ , :.,., - ~ , Z1 ~ s t :. i1 ceo 1: 1 5 3 . 1 3 fee t r
. .. .. h ~ ...., ~ '".. h -, /' ~, -, r1 1. 'I ~ 0" 5 0 0 0 f t
t ~ e n c ~ '.-11 t" a C.1 r ~ ...0 '. '''; ~ - ~ :... 1- 4 J U -.... ~ ,~ 1.. . e e , a
f 1 - 0 .., r I A A .. -, n" -,.... -. - r- 1 n r. n .. h 0 I' 1"""" G.... t- t .
ccntr.Jl angle 0 :J":''J 'i-' , .,... L.' _....~- -- '1'-" , - .!. ee, tnence
~or'::." 10018'20" Ea-to, a cl1St.J.~C~ 0:.I1J8 GO ~eet to Z1 r-01nt of curve,
t!1enc~ '.-lith a cu:-/~ to the lc:'~ '1"1'11....1 u r-1:1~1I... of 15000 fcet, a
ccn~r.Jl anrJ1.e of 13020'00", ,lnd un arc lent th o( 1,1) 99 feet, thence
hOoOl'JO..'n,.... a I'"
'...lith u becJring of !lort. '_..J'-: (-S....:lllCC of 1255 14 feet to a
p~in~ on the centerllnc of 11 Ij 22nd 1\V?nUe, thence \-lith a bcaring of ~.:i
South 8900,,'32" ~:e~t, along the ccntct"llne of n H. 2~nd l\JCnl.e il e.:~(",.
dist.:lnce o!: 817.85 feet r.ore or less to the Point of Dcqinning. .')i
Co::':..~ _ ~.~'l' g 5 ~ ~ .55 ,)crc~ more or 1 e ss lnd ~lI~)J Cl.. t to C:lscrocn t5 and rig h t5h i'
of ""d.' of ::c:cor:d. . u~,,;-:,~
.: .- ~.,; ....., . .
-.41 ~ .._~ ~.f,-.,";~/:!.
- .... . 'i: :'\~,~:~,'o:
,...: .:;. ".0:."-. ... ,..::. :.'
.;
~_.
."
~.t.r~:;.
...---
.jI...;~.~.:;.
....,...
- '."
,
.. t~~
"
. ,,'
. . ~
;. \"
. ~"
.r
."
','
~ '!',,)
."
"
, ';"...a
---
l, .
.' .' I,
.'
I' 'a
"
EXHIBIT "B"
080886-1
0558P
SPECIFIC AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER
~.
,
1. That the name of the development be changed to Quantum
Park At Boynton Beach.
.
.
2. 'rhat-- thtf Amended Master Site Development Plan (. Amended
Master Site Development Plan"), attached hereto as Exhibit -B" and
.
.
made a part hereof, submitted by Applicant in its application for
- .
Amen~ent to -the Development Order replace and supercede the
Master Sit~JDevelopment Plan currently approved in the Development
Order
;.
,. .:
-
\ ~
.\
.
,..
I
)
~
...~
-.
3. That Section 4( 1) be amended by adding the following
subp~~g-raph (d).:,
Cd) Quantum Park At Boynton Beach ADA Amended
Master Site Development Plan submitted July 9,
1986.
4. That references throughout the Development Order be
revise~ to conform to the Amended Master Site Development Plan.
5. That references throughout the Development Order be
revis:d, where applicable, to conform to the Memorandum from
R. T~o~as Powers (Goodkin Research Corporation) to Ed Deutsch
unde~ date of July 3, 1986, a copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhi~it
r
ne", and the Traffic Analysis Update prepared by
Kiml~!-Horn and Associates, Inc. under date of July 3, 1986, a
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "0".
L
~I
t'
.>
. \
4.;a
"
"
--..
,
MP-...STER SITE
!
~~VELOPMENT PLAN
.
.
~
QUA~~'pARK ~T BOYNTON BEACH P_I_D_
. JULY 7. 1986
,-
. .
Prepared by
QUANTUM ASSOCIATES
In Consultation with:
.'
RICHARD L. BOWEN & ASSOCIATES, Planners and Engineers
THE ROY BARDEN PLANNING GROUP. Landscape Architect
ROSSI & ~~LAVASI ENGINEERS, INC . Civil Group
KL~tLEY-HORN .AND ASSOCIATES, INC , Traffic Engineers
GCODKIN RESEARCH CORl?ORATIO~, Economic & Harketing Analysis
CCG~iETICS. I;NC . Harketing
.....
,.
~
. .
~
~
,
~
'a
(
(
MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Quantum Associates is pleased to submit herewith the proPaSed Master Site
Oevelop~ent Plan. It is consistent with the Amended Plan filed with the City
of Boynton Beach on January 21, 1986, approved by Ordinance 86-11, passed
June 3, 1986.
FOllowing are two excerpts from the original ADA, pages 20-2 and 20-19
respectively, that ~ddress the incorporation of distribution as a light
industrial use, ~ithin quantum Park at Boynton Beach.
A.)
Goodkln Research's analysis of the supply and demand
~eterminants for warehouse and Industrial space In Palm
Beach County Indicated that these uses constitute
significant real estate demand (investment) opportunities
at the s~te. The demand for warehouse space is stronq, and
althoug~ several ~ew industrial parks are competing in the
mark~tplace the ~ubject property offers a close-in and
highly visible location.
.
The relatively rapid growth of the population within the
park's Primary MarkeE Area has resulted in the construction
and planning of a significant supply of new shopping center
~ce. This, In turn, Increases the demand for wholesale
end distribution space in the area, in order to meet the
needs of the expanding retail ~ase. Many of these
distributors, (e.g., food warehouses, appliance
distributors, department- store warehouses, general
warehouses) require rail, and can therefore be
~ategically located within the SUbject property. The
high volume traffic generated by these tenants makes the
_use of trucks, as their major means of transportation,
uneconomical. Interviews with Seaboard Coastline Railroad
indicated that these types of distributors are relatively
large and occupy, on average, 50,000 to 100,000 square
feet, with the most popular buildings containing about
60,000 to 70,000 square feet.
s.) The tenant mix will be quite varied depending upon eventual
demand and as such is difficult to estimate. However,
Goodkin Research suggests that the following tenant mix is
reasonable and attainable:
Office Warehouse/Distribution
I. Micro-electronic telecommunications equipment.
2. Medical electronics (e g , electronic health
monitoring systems).
3. Process control teChnology
\.
..' . t
"
,.
i.'
.
.
"
(
(
"
4. Electronic surveillance systems and~ther ~tronic
,
components.
5. Computer systems.
6. Engineering, research and design
1. Pharmaceutical/medical products, and
,
.
8. Shippers, distributors, wholesale suopliers~
operations centers. liqht manufacturinq and
assembl inq.
. .
The pro?Qsed plan redistributes the land uses of the former approved plan In
order tcr accommodate the layout of a proposed distribution user that requires
a large parcel ~.tth rail access. In so doing, the commercial parcels were
arrangedalon~ a frontage. road, consistent with the desires of the City's
Planning Department. ...
OiagrawWA" Indicates the area of the plan that has undergone reconfiguratlon.
As shown. these reconfiguratjons have occurred only in the very center of the
park. and within the southern loop roadway. Outside of this area minor use
variations (Industrial land changed to R & 0, etc.), without change in parcel
configuration. have occurred in order to maintain a nearly Identical land use
dlstr:.ibution. Diagram "B" Illustrates the proposed plan whll e Diagram tiC"
illustrctes the approved Amended Master Site Development Plan.
Table Number 1 ha? been excepted from the previous Amended Master Plan
submi!:-l. The third column has been added to illustrate the comparative
diffel~~ between our currently proposed plan and the approved plan.
Economi ~ Ana 1 ys i s
Inclll~~ herein is a copy of a Memorandum from R. Thomas Powers of Goodkin
Researc~ In it he restates the fact that distribution uses had always been
contemplated as a use within the light industrial areas of the Park.
Traffrc- Ana 1 ys f 5
Also included herein is a copy of the traffic analysis and amend~ent, prepared
by Ji~ Zook of Kfmley-Horn. It identifies the consideration of distribution
use in cetermining traffic generation for the original ADA-DRI and subsequent
updates.
I ,
.-."
A'
..
'0
(
\
l
.'
-.
I ~ !~\Jt~
~:r..~ .
~ ~...,o c:--I L'"
~-
,
..-
0.. --- ...-)-
C...-rc'.'.-- - ZS1
f'~'::';:I _ -= ~R1
1I.....c~. 0."'--- ..........,- 452
~ 6'-'.0 -}-
L......-...- - lOO2
w.,'.....- ......
s.... "'... ~.- - - "00
,,~.._ == 3'7 0_
t~ 5J:l.~"::'
~1SP-l .,W._ -
, J1l._ti=
_ _ t:l~
K.M-I ,~ ....
7 .nn.y t9€6
,""" ..... .,."...
~ ~
~ ~-.
aJANTl.lM ASSOOATES
~ l:~~~.';.~...~:.:.- ~~~.=.~
... ....... ....-. ......
__._._._.----- .u'
~~-~..~---:.~ ~:!..~..---
-.::::-.~_.::.~~~.!:----
t. ~---
......... .......
J----
+--
~-
~
--
.--
DI1\GAAt-\ "1\"
'.
!(~ 1r;1~
'h~"
~ ~.,-~1."
(
\
\ ~\
\ ~ '~\
\\\.~~ ~.. __~j~)y>;~r-
l;~ \ ~r"\",,,,((I "'~<'?
~, II .
\ MAS~ER srrE DE\7EIJ~~~'~~.rr.:L~
L~GENO ~~~ 'r?~ -..
CO" c-- ,._0, --- "" .... " -
~2'''''''''- ~ .>,' 7 J\l\.Y .... """""',. pSSOC11'-re5
I......~~~. 1>)\
..__...--- _ ____1 ._.~_._.... ~ r- ."'.....-......- .......'
.. - _.--- ---- - -.,---'- .---......
-_.~- .- " "'._,~.,',""",..
~- --' - .........- . - ..,.....-.="'-='''''--
!.~~.-::..::~j ____ 4nO -~-' -
_ .. .,__'- _ _ .. _ "'r.:=-...."''''''''''',-.-
"...... :rJ 0
0"- "", ~ ."....,.
a-
T ;;.---: ..- -'
~-- - ~.-
--- I "
~rtr ---
-- ___a
.-
--
-
i\-- .-
.e ~-~
..-- - ...----
-----
~.
o 11\G pJ\i:'\ .. B"
\.
,. \~~Q"""''''''' q
~ ., .
r,' .
~\ r- '
~'I
I
.~
I
..
(
Il \\
"......
.,. ... .....,....,.. .~-,
,," ~" \lW.I.,,~O _" ."":.'.,, .-' .-" . ....... ,ilt'
.v ' ~,,(1"
.-- c,\TI" , # .,...----
__ 0.__-- .....
..------ .......
Plf\GR.f>J'\ "C"
\
,
t
~ 0 0'\
,..:l r- ("lOOM .
p.- M.... . . 0'\
~("l r- O\.OOi..O ._r-
. . M ft'l
P ('tli..O ('tl i..O("l i..O \f'I ~<I' \f'I
t:J M r"l ~\f'I ('tl
tf) .... ....
0
~\
~
p..
~
~
.pc..
~
,;>0.
Ot:l
tGC
P-4~
P-4 to"
~ '$\
~
, '.
~o
,
....
.
('tl
('tl
. ....
. .
('tlr-
~
I'
I
,
~
~~
tf)P-4
p"",,,
p~
~-
r" H ~~---
~~ ~
~ 0 ~ ii
~ ~ ~ ~\.
~Op.. to-'
tJ) ~\
H p C'
~~ -'\
p .,:::.
\\ ~\
\
I
\
\
\
t::\
tn,
~\
0\
~\
!
,..
, \
("'lC"l
. .
('tl~
\f'I<l'
....
oi..O
r-
~
C\
.
0:>
('l
....
-
r"
ro
~r"
oro
~ ..-4
",,0
sG~
CU~
~~
r"Q)0
ro~O
..-4 -
o r ~
~.aQ)
Q)~;::
~ --' .v
~00
5
or-
<I'
\f'I
~
....
....
i..O
("l
.v
~--'
(!)ro
~.~
<:)~
p..v
0tJ'l
--'~
<:)'0
--'';:>~
ro 0)'.-4
..-4 rO
..~ .v
"".4"c
tJ'l 0'
~ ;:: ..-4
rtJO--'
~~
HQ~
'Q)CJ
.vtfl"c
~CJ.v
O'~o
..-4
,..:\
Q)
o
.~
~
~
o
\ \ \ \
("lOOi..O
. . . .
oi..OoCP
\f'I ~~
~cpOO
('l
....
....
~
tM
l:>
~
~
u
~
o
t:l
p..
o
,..:\
t:J
?>
tsl
P
f:.o
o
H
~
~
o
~
C)
?
tJ}
(1\
("l
('tl
\f'I
. .
i..O
<l'
i..O\f'I
r-
Q)
o
ro
p.
tJl
Q)
o
ro
p.
tfl
~
?'~
~(l)
(l),C
_ tJl.v
tJ'l 0)0
~ ~..1S
~ ~~
.v tfl~~
o rtJ..-4 ro
~ ~p.p.
tfl ro
_CJ--,tQ~
tJ'l~.v~.v
o Q 0 ro'.-4
~,..:\~tf)U
Q
~
~
o
P-
O
0'\
0'\
('tl
\f'I
0'\
0'\
('tl
\f'I
tfl
<0
ro
o
~
tf)
H
~
~
o
~
\.
r
I'
..
Ie
/
(
(
GOOOKIN RESEARCH CORPORATION - Advisors to The Real Estate and FinanClol Industries
MEMORANDUM
-."
,.
To:
Mr. Ed Deutsch
From:.
R. Thomas Powers
;
Subjeet:
Date:
'-.
,.
Qunntu~' Park At Boynton Beaeh
July 3, 1986
.
b 1984, toe GoodkIn Research Corporation eompleted the original economic
analysis for-- w)lat was then 'known as the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce. The park
at that nrnE! was in its planning infancy The analysis eompleted then was likewise
based en a conceptual plan and the resulting economic analysis and forecasts were
heavily- COUched in Palm Beach eountywide averages for employees per square foot,
cons~_~on costs, wage and salary levels, and the like.
1n ~98S, the park was purehased by Quantum Associates and was renamed
Quantum Park At Boynton Beach Today the park is more than a concept; "liven
tenants- are negotiating for "real" space. The development of what is South Florida's
most advantageously located, high quality business park is n reality.
C-codkin Rese~ch was recently retained to take another, more qualitative, look
at L;-e. Q~tum Business Park and the way it was initially beginning to build its tenant
base. Some concern has been expressed about the impaet that the first tenant, Publix,
would t:2ve on the overall employment forecast completed in the original DR!. Several
points .:..:.....uld be stressed along these lines
1) The original DRI applied eountywide employee-pet'-square foot averages to
the then proposed land uses. These forecasts then became baselines used
to evaluate the economie impaet of the park at buildout. Like any forecast
based on averages, the mid-term results are likely to deviate some through
build-out as averages become reality To hold those forecasts as rigid
"lawll at every point during build-out does not account for what must be a
reasonably flexible development plan in an ever changing market.
2) Distribution functions were always seen as nn integral use within the park.
The original market analysis nnd the DRI recognize distribution functions
as a natural for a park located contiguous to major north-south rail and
rubber tire transport arteries (not to mention the major West Palm Beach
Airport).
, .
Gooe:(In BUlld:ng. 275 Cc~m~rClcl Bcu~evc:a,lc~d-::rC;:)le.b.,.lne,Seo. Flcroda 333(:3 l:!::l51..~3-5:};1. Miami Q'-:O.6006
,,'
t'
1.
(
GOOOKIN RESEARCH CORPORATION
l\Iemc.andum to Mr Ed Deutsch
July 3, 1986
Pnge 2.
~
,
It is 110 surprise to Goodldn Research that a major quality, highly visible tenant
like Publbc: ehose to make its home here. And the fact that they are the flagship
tenant suggests that the quality of the park at buildout will be even higher than
originally foreseen. :J'his is because quality tends to br~ea quality, hIgh quaUt'J tenants
tend to eluster.
r.
.
t
Distribution, by its very nature, employs fewer employees-per-square foot than
do some of the more "intensive-use" industrial tenants detailed in the original DRI -
~lect:"onies, medical, engineering/planning and the like. Simply put, the distribution
function was part of the original employment forecast. And because it is the first
tenan'tr as opposed to the tenth, for example, is not cause to worry that the original
employment forecasts cannot be achieved.
,J ,
R TP /lct
. ,
r
\\
, I
'.
(
/
/ (
[Zr[fI'o(ff}t!a J{J@u->JfJ [1
r&rimlev_;..;crn and Assoc:ZJtes, inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive, West Palm Beach, FL33407. (305)845-0665 l
West p"lm Beach. Tampa. Orlando. Fllauderdale. M,ami, Palm (;1:/. I
RaleIgh, Durham. Chatlo~e. Nasnvllle. Oallos. AustIn, pnoen'll I
July 3, 1986 -
4479 OG(07)/T021-49
1\lr George Zimmerman
Deutsch Ireland Properties
Suite 1106, International Buildina-
o
2455 East Sunrise Boulevard
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304
Re: -Boynton Beach 1>ark of
Comr.rerce (Quantum)
Traffic Analysis.Update
Dear 1\1r. Zir::merJ1lan:
As requested by you, we have updated the traffic analysis for the above referenced
project to reflect the most recent site plan changes (plan dated June 23, 1986). these
changes reflect an internal road\vay.... network change south of NW 22nd A venue. Our
review also included the specific use for a 55 0 acr~ industrial parcel
(Warehouse/Distribution Center) also south NW 22nd Avenue.
'The ttaffic generated by the updated site plan was assigned to the revised roadway
system. (No change in traffic distribution would result from the plan revisions). the
external irr-:'acts had no change but the intersections along NW 22nd Avenue within
the project 'Jill have some minor lane use changes. The peak hour traffic volumes and
the intersc-=ticn needs for the revised network are depicted on the attached sketch.
Also enclosed with this letter are the critical path capacity analysis computer printouts
showing the level of service at each intersection.
Reg,~ -.:~~ the warehouse/distribution center, it should be noted that this is a
use assumec ",';ithin the industrial category reflected by the ITE traffic generation rates.
Therefore the use was already considered by the traffic studies and updates which have
been com;>leted, including this update.
Enclcs~d under separate cover is an appendix to this letter report containing traffic
assignment update work sheets. Please let us know if you or the City of Boynton Beach
has a que~icn regarding this report.
Very truly yours,
JRZ!nan
A ttachme..ts
K \lLEY-IIORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
~/ /Oh~~5 ~. "0:-C/L.
James R. Zook, P E J
/'n' 1 '/\ /
l~ 7-!3J--3G'
f1
~'-'
..,.~
~ '\~
..,... --
~~
~~
, G
.,,-
\
NO-r1Z' ~
(
l-OS C
g.J;\- ~ ~~ ~
" ,0.) -
..
~~
~~
~-
~~
~
,:
,1
. ,
~
-".
\
t~"'O Sc.J.L.~
I
LOS 0
_r-.J1
~~~
tJ\.l 7.?""A~ ~; ~
4o-1.::r
,4'5' ......
'2z.~
a
'$
\)
~
<$
~
~
A::... ,,1
....... ~
...e;:-Io::>
~t ~
0-..9
...()~
q~ .s;:.
pM PeAl( \-\OLl~
'T~AfflC. \/ot;UM€:'S
!-1~'1.1.- t,..Je.
n\~~
:f\\H
~
~
~
.:)
~
i:.
::
~~
>>I"
-S'!
~'-l
~
~
u,rtE-f(5SCnON Nt
~
\
r
"
.'
~.
.. ~ 2
~ - ~
~ -
g!;~
~~~
~~~
;::
M ~_
~:~
E~~
~, -
~:.~
'" ~-
'::~
:;. g ;'g : ;- go to
:3c.e2:S:;'~~>
5: ~O ~ ;. :l'3- g g ~ [ ~o
:SCrtOO ftt~ (,D
C1t:s....~ a~.:G'O
!O"'CIO~tlOa:"~
:'0..... s:::.;:"CI ci ~ ""O:r
'tJ;;ii::rg..Q.~CD~
tDC':2~ ID'<S-
~::S~~~:-g Ct
~'l:lSCl':5!:~'i:i
~o~~g~~;'
-:3 Po- Po"'::~
;- i. s ~ n Q. ".. ,...
~~~~;~"[i
'CO B 2,.!" a C:~;:;o
- ~ -
l;'g~0- ~5!0-3
2- : ~ : g :3 ~. ~
~ 0:3- ~ t::l:' ~--o
g ? ~. ~ ~ ;: Dt g
:!. E;' 9 o. =- ~ 8. ~.
~:3gjp.=-n=-..
~o.rt'o:::oc"~"
=="'CD~"" .,I
:g~g-ga~~
c..<.;;~m~~;.t;
",..~3~o~CPtI
Cl:I DI :1 0.. ~.-g
~. ~ ::s .. n -
~o.:':s<'DC::3~
:3 :> c ~ So.!" ~ =-::-0
tlCD;l.~~o...rP""
;'. ~ if "0 <: !!!o ~
O'c..;;;:~~'O~
., en" CP n ~ ~ ~ ~
r'\ "'Og~e:Cl)Q.;~
N~~~w~i~
~ \~~~[~if~
en
~
o
3
-
o
..
:s
Po
..
C
<::1'
...
~
c;:
'"
c..
<::1'
'"
0-
..
co
a
'"
:To :;- 5"
tII ;':r
co '"
>
c
""
c:
CoO
..
N
o
....
-0
0>("')
""0
!;
r
~
..
..
"0
C
5!:
;;"
:T
III
c..
50
..
..
c:
:s
III
~
'"
"0
..
"0
~
5"
3
;
..
..
o
....
...,
~
0:
.!'!
-
:T
co
-
...
:T
co
co
...
...
co
...
:r
'"
p.
...
o
'l:l
'<
2,
..
p.
<
!!:
...
,,0
,:i"
~
.. ~
e:5~
~ g a
co 0 '"
:> co ...
~:;.;
t: = c:
:> '< :>
Po .. P.
~ ;. ;
; =- nO
~ .. :>
~ ~ ~
-6 ~ ~
~ -. :r
.. g
("');:;:'
-'<
D1"
CoO ~
"'~
:>
co
~~
<-5
"
III
:;'::
~~
("') en
o 0-3
C >
Z 0-3
0-3 t"J
-< 0
o ...,
'OJ 'OJ
"" t'"
> 0
t'" :::l
:: a
tI:l >
~
n
;I:
'0::>
'\~
--~
~ ~-
~
-
~
~
-...t:l
~
c::::.
---
\
\
~ t-3
:: :::c:
; tJ:j
..
3"",,~
tI:l;' :1
~~~
.. a. ~
:l'c
ag, to
tI:l'< -
Ill" ~.J
l!:~>
:Ten ,.....
("')c \,..J
o:t ~
cc..~
:to>
-'<
~ ~
o
00
t-3
~
~ ~(
'\;- ~ '
~
~
"'::I
=
o
o
"'Il
o
..,
":l
C
=
e-
n
>
-'I
o
:oe
...,
~
5:
..
- ---
!== !~=~~~i~fi{;:~!:~;~ :~:~~!~!~~~;f!'~;~:~~::f~::~~:~::~~;[;f~~;~:~~~~[~~~;:~;~~~~~:~f[~f~>I~:l:~l:~~tr:
~;o ;:=~2;r:i~~;;;=::!i i:~~>':i::g~i~:i:;;::~;~:~~:~:~ii~;~i~;:g~5~~~;!::;~!~~~~~:. ~~!i:::::~i~i~i;~~:i:ii
~~:::a!~;:i!\~f:~i1;i~:':i!:!:;i:~~:i~~~ii;i!~i;~!;i~~~!;~!;i;!;;i:~;5il.I;r~:~!i'; ij~~11i::i::;~1:i~~~~:
rJ.~~.~.'" ~.!.~:;:.!.!.:"r~:.-: ;:~!.ii! i.~~8;.i:; 7S.:;a::;_; :r-i ;!..;!::-~~=!~~..~!~?::;~~: '; "~:.~i ~~;S?n;"::".~..:
:...~~.~;~l:;;:j;!:::~~ff;~:~=~i~.~ii:i~Q;~=fi~~::!~~~~~fi;~~:~!:'ii~:!;~=~:;i~ ~ i ~~i!~:i~i~ii;i:i!ii~:;
~lt.:~1!~~"ft~s~::!..~.~.;~fl.;.8:laJ!.~ . ~lo~!:~~:&;:.~~~r.~!!.i~.:~:.=~i. ~~ii.'. ; : ~~l.!;;:ft::~;:-~:~;~~;
~1:!~.j~~=:!~8-i!~~f f~~r::!!~:. f:~.l. ;~~~i' ::n~~~~~~~~~!!~~~;~:~~;.~:: ~!.w: i! ~~~:;~!::;z~.~i~!~~~i!
~i:~;lfilll~!I~I!~::li~~~~i 1~~ili!i~iJ~gii;ii~!I!i~I::!lli::~l:;II~I~f~ !~;il i ~ :1!:;!;~~lill~i~iillil
~=;!;:::!.~t!:;.~:=.a~l:: :~~'-!:i~it:'!!.;' ii" ".:~~!'f~!.!..!.:,:!::,~!.::,~~.~:S!.i:::;: 'i:~fr !.!. ~::~;J'~;fl,;:'J.ii-;~!!t!;
,.
c:
C7
...
n
"0
C
5!:
.r
:T
III
C.
0>
...
1l.n::.~...z.. - - -
II n..;5' .... ;!!: ii;i~~5!!;~ gIll! ~5"" ;;!iIf:~;~:!!.;= l~ii~~8~;~8;!~tr;~~ii:::rf~i'fi~:fi:1
iii ~;~H~~~ .. ~
~~~i; z!.'P . > >
:~ii HHfU1H ~. ~!.; ~UnHi;~fHU -~~- g~8~8~8~g~.~~_:.~~-~..~i-~IS ...7-
)-1 ~ . ;;;::~ ~ ~ ~;~:~!i~::I~;~!.r.::.!~i:~i
~i :~:.: J :O!, o..~J" a~: ~n~~ ~~ ~ ::; :~;ii!~i~!~~i!~~~[~~ifJ~~i5~!i;~l~~~:
0.. I. }!;i j;: r~~: H ~~;
~~~ I: ili
t!~ ~ CI ;: ~ .:i;~'w : :~!
I ~~;.l ~r~; . i . s; ~ J :: Go :7;Q~: _ ~- ~.. !:~!r.:.f.!~:.~::~:~:~!.:::!!5:i.t~~i
;~.: ml; IIIll ~ ~i ~:; ~ :d;88ol-: ;:::!
I .n..~7 ~: . o .
:~:~~ "n i!..~i;! ~. ! -....- ~a~:H!~ !~:H ;~;;!!;!;!;!i!:illillli;l;il;iii!!!!!
'. . ~-=
:~~ "!
~E~~! Ei~~ ;~!....... ~ .~ ' >
.~- ::;w s. ~= . ~::
. .- o. . .. -... ?~!.:. ~~ 00
L .. Ii ;:~ ~;J!. ~;i. . A.:---:'
s.~~:.-~
~
...
III
.,
...
:l
""
~
g- ;;.
so .-
...
II>
..,
0>
3"
OJ
co
0>
Z g.. 2, tIS
~ 50 0-3 ~
... .., :T C7
n" ~ .Qf
'" 3" ;;:' .,
g' 3" III
.. OJ 3:
... '"
:T ..
("') n 3:
o :r n
g ~ 0
~ r ~
...
~
ir-.
-=-. --
l"
...J
.-~
60-::
f1
'-"
~.,
,. .
"
..
-
- ~
.
",
EXHIBIT "e"
GCCC,,:N r::s: ,",~CH CCRPOR....TICN - Advisers to The h'col Esto'e c:--o F'rc:--.:::::::lbcustnes
MEMORANDUM
To:
i\Ir Ed Deutsch
From:
R. Thomas Powers
Subject:
Quantum Park At Boynton Besch
Date:
July 3, 1986
In 1984, the Goodkin Research Corporation completed the original economic
analysis for what was then known as the Bovnton Beach Parh. of Commerce The Dark
at that time was in its planning infancJ ~The analysis completed then was likewise
based on a conceptual plan and the resulting economic anulysis and forecasts were
heavily couched in Palm Beach countywide averages for employees per square foot,
eonstruction costs, wage and salary levels, and the like
In 1985, the park was purchased by Quantum Associates and was renamed
Quantum Park At Boynton Beach Today the park is more than a concept, "live"
tenants are negotiating for "real" space The development of what is South Florida's
most advantageously located, high quality business park is a reality
Goodkin Research was recently pcta,ined to take another, more qualitative, look
at the Quantum Business Park and the way it was initially beginning to build its tenant
base. Some eoncern has been expressed about the impact that the first tenant, Publix,
would have on the overall employment forecast completed in the original DRI. Several
points should be stressed along these lines
1) The original DR! applied countywide employee-per-square foot averages to
the then proposed land uses. These forecasts then became baselmes used
to evaluate the economIC impact of the park at buildout. Like any forecast
based on averages, the mid-term results are likely to deVIate some through
bUIld-out as averages become reali ty To hold those forecasts as rigid
"law" at every point during build-out does not account for what must be a
reasonably fleXIble development plan m an ever changmg market.
2) Distribution functions were always seen as an integral use within the park.
The orIgmal market analYSIS and the DR! recognize distribution functions
as a natural for a park located contiguous to major north-south rail and
rubber tire transport arter:es tnot to mentIOn the major \, est Palm Beach
Air~ort)
Goc.c"n Cu, =~;;l. L 7'5 C;:~'Terc:=; :;:'_ ~'.:::':::. =-=.:;-::= e.c I :re _e:J. ;:'~":::J _2_:3 ,_:- - - ~ ::-1 c:-r119":0,6006
- t]
""
l.
"
,I
-
.~
~
",
~:. II 3 IT" C"
GCC2i<1'\J f(ESE......RCH CO;(PORATlCN
Memorandum to \Ir Ed Deutsch
July 3, 1986
Page 2
It is no surprise to Goodh.in Research that a major quality, hibhly visible tenant
like Publi.'C chose to mah.e its home here And the fact that they are the flagship
tenant suggests that the qualitv of the Darh. at bUlldout will be even higher than
originally foreseen This is beca~se quality' tends to breed quality, high quality tenants
tend to cluster
Distribution, by its very nature, employs fewer employees-per-square foot than
do some of the more "int,msive-use" industrial tenants detaIled in the original DRI -
electronics, medical, englneerin~/planning and the like Simply put, the distribution
function was part of the original emplo\ ment forecast A.nd because it is the first
tenant, as opposed to the tenth, for e\.ample, IS not cause to 'lorry that the original
employment forecasts cannot be achieved
RTP/lct
.
f1
....
l.
"
'.
.- ....
.'
EXEIBr'" "D"
-1
I
I
--:-- 7' ~ t; -1 -,
-,----::' ' ~ -. ,-. -. U, ""7'1 - -:-l
'- ..~~'-__L\~ ......._,r-L/~_' ...../u
'-
r&fimley.Hcrn and ;::lssac.~ieSJ L'n[;. ~-131 Emb:HC:1dcro Dnve. \/esl P31m Beach. FL33~07. (305)845-0665 .....,
I "'eSI p"lm Be~cn T,'mo~. Crl~nClO. Fl L;!uClerCla1e. M'~ml. P"'m c..'V'. I
R,Jle1f)". Durham. Cr..1rIO~(" N.ls,nVlllc. 0.:1lld5. Au~hn. Pt'ooen,. j
I Julv 3, 1986
-t-l79 OG(O'j)/TO~1-49
i\lr George Zimmerman
Deutsch Ireland Properties
Suite 1106, International Building
2455 East Sunrise Boulevard
Fort Llludernale, Florida 33304
Re Boynton Beach Par~ of
Commerce (Quantum)
Traffic Analysi'5 l!pda te
Dear ;\Ir Zimmerman
As requested bv YOU we have uDdated the traffic anal\'sis for the above referenced
project to reflect tl~e -most recent site plan changes (plan dated June 23, 1986) these
changes reflect an internal roadwav network change south of NW 22nd Avenue Our
review also included the specific use for a 55 0 acre industrial parcel
(Warehouse/Distribution Center) also south NW 22nd Avenue
The traffic generated by the updated site plan was assigned to the revised roadway
system (No change in traffic distribution would result from the plan revisions) the
external impacts had no change but th~ intersectiops along NW 22nd Avenue within
the project will have some minor lane use changes. The peak hour traffic volumes and
the intersection needs for the revised network are depicted on the attached sketch.
Also enclosed with this letter are the critical path capacity analysis computer printouts
showing the level of service at each intersection
Regarding the warehouse/distribution center, it should be noted that this is a
use assumed within the industrial category reilected bv the ITE traffic generation rates
Therefore the use was already conSIdered by the tra1fic studies and updates which have
been completed, incluCing this update
Enclosed under separa te Cover is an appendIX to this letter report containmg traffic
assignment update \Vorl... sheets. Please let us hnow if )oou or the City of Bo)nton Beach
11[1s a question regarding this report
\ cry trulj yours,
JRZ/nan
Attachments
IddLE\-IIOrr\[ AND ,\SSOCI,\TES, l~C
~ I ,).~ I
-?/~(l/( ~'- ~ v-- ~y--'
.James rr\ Zooh., P E J
Fnncipal \ 7 I ~/- S G
'------/ -....-::;:/
(;
~\.;
--
.. ----->>
--
..:.-
LOS 0 "'~..o::.. 111
;, ';;; ~ ...... ~C;
..;t ~ \t $\b~
~ 1-"""'~q
'f J'"."",. -i) _ _.
"'"\ - <) ~
\4-/ " ~ C'
'22~ ...
<:.
"..
LOS A
1.0SB
'0U~
- ~'<. p.~ ~8.S
'v~ r :;:'r',:Ol-l.1,
P ,c::flC-
-rrz,... r
\
- .-.-l
~
.'
~.
..-- '
II
r-iLC:
:_ ~ i\. c. ~ ~ r- t-: 1 J_ 1" 10.,
1_ "\ 1,':;: 1- ....,L 1'111'... Et',O':T ,..,iJ....,L_ '; -= I ::
I;EF uh T nU;-,tJTi lil C 1 h ..,i'JU f'~..J .....: H1..IE
['M I i::. F 1'1 r- Crl! HuUh Tl-Il i-iL fhAFt=" I C
~**** ~***** ~~-~*~~~*~~*~***~**~**
LE~~L uF :E~~ICE b
:::i::' TJ li,AT I ui'J ': I.
~~ITl~AL ~/: VuL _':4
~klriChL ~iW ~0L _~4
U; I T I c.;,:_ :Ui'i 11 >7 :
****~**~******~**.*~*********~**~**~*
L::;t-iE
;>J ::E TH~I "_".m
r'KI"'..' U 1 DTH
Uoo,M:. ':'C:u,"c. J F. Y
: ou f1~B :Iurm
r'io'J W I [i-j H
E::; : 113uUi m
ri:)'J l.; Hl'j H
Wt::.T80UND
t'iuV WIDTH
1
fi. t -, 0
. ....
L. 1 - u
....
L . 1':' IJ
R . 1': lJ
T 1.... i)
T 1':' II
T 1':' \1
T..
-,
4..
T .
T
L
1':.0
1:':.0
1': l)
1:' l)
.-.
'-'
..
.:
-'
r,c F. I H.c::UUf-/D
T~Hr-F 11~ '..IIIL.'- '1t:.::
:.1_ UTH.:;UUiJi)
l'oot...: 1 bu _ Nll
l..E:.:: TBOUNV
Lt:.=T
THi'dJ
k i I_'M r
"
- - ...
\1
(I
II
I
1 (ll,
) \ /1'2.-)
: 11 (j~ I)
11 (I(
I)
(I
1 _ lJ U{ 11)
,.j, It; IIif:O J,~ 1I
'-.(IIY;-HblIU; u
~f-i-3 r~:: I :;-4i)
WE:.1 BuU,.:LI
i l"\ I I: i:. (
1 (I
LCI_,...,L bU_r:.: (,. 1-10\)
II
r f:.MI 1-1' "_'f' F Me Telk
11)
1 i)
111
II
J
(I
-,
Hit-bItKj
1
1.:()
l)
Ui~~Ecril_,J :c.-~I'HI Iu~!
BOTH 1 UF"u'.I: I. hO ([-.1_ n::LI ( .... J. TH u v c.nLHr )
11- - J \ ,;1 r.:.L _ I Hn )
'J J :
E lJ
F'l:1. E: .j-I, f....1 n'_ i ~ '" r -j- (
CY,-'LE LDJ ,TH
Lc.I.:r.: II_.Y'--L':
~
:: E (': J [ _
C d T j 1- I ,L L;:'fJE vIILlJ, t-.:: i:: I i ,U v t-.&"~~IH
rl-1~U -;; 11 'HT
ll:.F r
,11_ hT ;!:'I-I!., l)
1 "" :
__,I
,II! n !--if" "-'iJU
I I
II
Loot... r[,_oIl,.iU
,,[...... -
~,H:. - I [, ,-,I lr J lJ
~I ,~
II
I =:'
U:...i'l TI!hrJ 1 HLI.f
1 r-s, I I r '';. ILI.I ..:::
M(I,IU'. Tf:.D \)UL
I ,...,1- (..,( r T 'I
,I I'~ C 1b ! r
,1'-I,THc',_1 LI
_:..+
4_:.
I I
1.1
~JI :,
111-' i He-I II IIIIJ
(I
'.1
Il
,1/,1
l:.1; _ 11..iIIU,~iJ
l)
II
l)
~J/ 14
..t: :.1 (,I IlJ...u_t'J
v
.:.11
lJ
t J I 1-1
l.
,.
~t
,t.
.......--
"
rILL
s li'IX,r~L', r.;l':
1- ,~. ,
_IIH
Ci\ I T I a: ;,L r ICt' (~I'.E\'J I h ~:.;L Y : I :
1,~F'Uh T i'.~.J ..:..._ f-1....'L ht~U -k".. T I.C r1 l..jlC I r,L :_..r F;.
D~IE FM PEA. HuUF; TOThL T~~FFI~
*~***~~*~*$***~~~~~**~**~*********
LEV~L ~F :EhVl~E H
:.-1rUkATICl-J 41/
~hlTI~NL N/~ ~uL 4
~~lT.rCNL ~/W VOL ~4~
Ch I T I C~L :.drl "74':
**********~**~**~***************~****
LANE
t-:c,r.;, THE,uU:.JD
MO',", l.JlInH
LAN,~ Ijl:.OI":E I r\ ,
:.I_IUTH..1uUj.1D
I'~OV WIDTH
l:.h-: Tl:.OU. m
t1,.. V lJ I DTH
WE.: fEtI:lll~m
r-:clv Wl DTH
1
R. .
12 (I
r:, .
T
T
T
1.....1.1
1': u
1':' II
1':' II
T .
T
r
12.Cl
1..:.. (I
,..,
~
-,
.J
4
1 .2. I)
::.
~I
I'JC ~\ Ti-i80Ui.J[I
",;:\s.,f- F _I.. ....'uLl.. :'k::
;:, "',U1 HE.uUr-!D
t:.......: j'buU~.O
WE:: TBCIUi,jLl
II
\ )
u
1 _ -+.:.
14'_
(I
1447
LEfT
THRU
r~ I ,...;1 T
II
()
71
il
Ii
i JC,F. THI3uU.1D
.;OUThE:a IU;'Ji)
;;::;-;.:;Tf?IIU. .D
~E::TBOUND
ThUU - (/. )
1 I I
111
In
10
L _ I ....'L i: U: L ... (. ;~ I Hr. )
II
f-t:.n: r11_1_ '\ F,..;C",uF,
(I
lJ
(
~,
F HH.:' r :K,
r'.l/ :'
1
1
,-IE 1 rHr 1'\ II r ,J
NEiTfi~::n li!,~;~
1 ,i
II :.Fcc,rH.::
1- r":U I ~I_ I LD
F' hU I ~::C -I [=:[,
-, ~ ,I l:: L _ / ,;1', )
E/t.J
I- ED':.:' n; r ;;~J NI_. T r 'J( I f
(. (I_.LE LE~.!1j I H
LE..-T: /,- t 1_ LE
1
'_hITll-nL L.....IJc: ....11._Uil.:-__ br' rll 'vC::li!:.r~r
tl
:.I_,uriiLII.lJ
II
II
L.~... TL".(I oI"IU
(, Ill.
I'
\..jL: iLiUUi'.JU
~ i~ :
(I
,lCh I t11.III.r~[1
THf'11 -hl(Hl
U-Fr
..I....
LfYT Tllr"~ 1_ 1.1
I_I.~
III
L.H _ I L'I tl,I,liJ
()
()
II
II.:
...L _ 1" L 1)1 {'J(t]
1I
'.I
L.7
UI:.
J rJ,...IJT ..... ;L1..11 ;E
h[l....!ll :., LD I)IIL
(I-.;; hl~ 1 I Y
1";'..'VEI1i::r J I
,II h 'il.iL:.111 t 1[1
()
n
-4
_I-IU I htll Ii I. II..!
II
(I
il
l.
.~
..
~ 't
:: :u:
r ra:'-:l- i'iT Ii. Ci":A
1_ 1 I I ..,L nU\/":i:~ JT i-1t~H _ Y:: 1::
i' Et= JI \ I. I-~U;-" J f1_lt 1 t:lL VD
LIi-1 T ~ t- 1'1 ~. Et.,: HuUr"
,:',i~Ll ,.~ .:: ,....V"t.
.(11 HL- I .-\::'1- F I C..
*~**2~~~~.***~~***~~.*4*~***~~*~~*
L~V~L uF ~E~VI~E C
,:.t; ,lit,..... r i OJ'~ 74 'l.
U-dT J:(i-1L N/: VIIL ~; _Jr
~~IIIC;-,L C/W VOL ~~~
I_.~ I I 1 (.;.;L :::.Url 1..:...':':'
******.~*~*****~*~****<<**************
U:;j,;E
I JUf, rHl:luU;.ll!
1':0',,' l.J I D 1 H
LAr.:t:: 1_,C:OrtETF, (
:.OU rHJ::':1 Uim
t"IU'J ~i. LiTH
EI....:: 1'1:.1 _:, III
t'~uV l.J I D I H
~..~: i BOUND
t'ill'.,,' l.J J DTH
1
R. .
T .
L. .
12 l)
1: ()
1':' 1 I
R. 12.u R 1::'.(1
. . .
T 1:' () T 1..:... l)
L . 1..:... lJ -I . 1_ \)
L 1_ II I 1':::' (I
L 12 ()
H. . 12 (l
T 1~ 0
T . 1 ';'J (I
--
T 1': (J
I
L 1......l)
~.
..:...
-,
....
'-
"T
-:.
I-
'-
r.:e:F- n-i801_ rm
Tt,,...,;=r- -:- C '';( LU, ic.::
_ ullT ri -:UUi\!U
E.....: 1 [u I' If,,[1
l..E:: TbuUND
L::::= j"
,-hr;ll
RII.,-lT
11":(IWS....
1] ~
\I (lSl;
- - ,:~
1 _(1~:")
1 .._ ': 7
I) ( 10)
47 (. i1)
1 1...,.
_1_ (3 ~ ~)
() (/95)
~.; \ THc.1 iU~ D
- :,UTl-it:lrIUr La
1::,..;-= I BuU,.[I
we::,' &,_:t.i ~i:l
T;:-dJI_ I - (, j
1', I
111
1\1
10
L 1_ _,., L L:I oj _ c. :: (~. 1 -I h )
\1
II
II
II
f-l::,..,~ t- II In f-. HCTCIf;.
~/
':'H~ :: It il_i
. II -
E l..!
i.l,i1Y
.:~
1:.1) 1 H 11-,,- r i _ r'U I 1- 1_ , C....I \ ~I (TH (I'... t-.I,L';I- )
helT..; j'!hi.: r-r"IITL,_TcLI (~aTH 1-1,,['hLrl,-)
, - / J d;,-~Li_/i-ii,,)
: 1+
F E[II::. :0 .;; i HI J ,;,
CYCL.E La~:'IH
LEt- T :: I I t U_ E
1
1._11
i 1
_E,.a-ilu-
.- F- I TIC,...,L L,.,i.=. 1..-". :'.1_ "",L t:. -( r .UI,,'r~f'Il:.rJ r
-, _oll
1 - _
~;I::. _ TBIIU~llI
ii:u
_ \.1
~~I-f,rr~ I
....1
___I"HL\,j rlu
,,:: I'L 1.11. ~ Ll
TH,..II -h I :,!-iT
Lt.,:" r
1 _ .J
1.... i
- -I
'-
Lt:",=-T j'\ r\OJ I .-,f:1 f
r
"?
L", 1..._.III'U
1_':::'
L,(
~..Jt. _ TUUllr~I.l
it l f1
~...
(.:,ll
I)
N/i-t
lr Ir(' V.I.....'..~.=:
"'(1,.,,_ .' l"r"'ll ".IL
( ,..;;:: ~('l I (
I~I- Jt::I,':.i IT
.1I1h I H2.1_ I ,'Ill
1 J. ':
147
1..:...~5
l'Ji~
, III hr,l oi ,IU
- I I
II
~l/l;
... ,J ...
~l/h
oJ
o.
..-- '
I 11-:::
lk 1 "rll I ("""l'lf
etl;.;
C,"\ I I 11_.,...,L l'k:'v' c:. 1'1.... NT hr,J;-,._ i - ~ ~,
I,Ei-'U,"\ T rJ~1 -... HI)l:. HdD LI-.._ r Ct ::'i11E.:C r;-,L c r h.
[ii-i IE r i'\ }- El.,~. HI_,Uf, T ':' r;:"L Thhrt= I 1:-
**************~****~*~~*~~**~~~***
LEV~L uF -E~VICE C
::,j-1 fUi,;.; I .l Oi J (.,' .
ChllI:;:"L ~/: V0L 1~5
Ch.L T 1 C;.;L EI W 'JelL 111': ~~
C~ITI~;:"L :UM 11~~
******~9********9****************~**~
LA~C::
,'~I:;; THBul_,...[1
l'iuV lJ I [-;"H
L;:"NE Cii::':lj~:=:Th-(
.::;OUTHSCIUj'.~U
r~uv l..r DTH
cA: I BuU, D
l'.u'''; l...l [ITH
l.IE::: I BuUtJD
flu'''; WID I H
1
fi .
12.u
h: . 1... IJ
T 1~ (J
I 1':' II
T 1_ II
I .
I
I
L
12.0
l:.U
l'::.U
l':'.U
.-
~
-,
-'
-4
-:.
/.:.
r..o;:., I H80UrJlI
Tt-\;-,Ff' I C \',',-ILU:1C::
::.( UTHE: -IUN[I
EI-1: I EuUrJU
We.:: 'n;uu:~[l
1
...
1~4
1...10
il
LEFT
Tl-lhlJ
F; I (,..,T
lJ
II
1! :
II
I I
()
I,i
1~1
fl_,F; T;-,bui I, JU
::,C" IThFOI h,[
t:r.:: I B._.U:JD
Wi: ::' j c;uU'~[;
Tj;UC - (')
ill
ill
1 I I
111
U i _ nL L 1-' _ c:: (T:; I (""in)
I)
( I
I)
1-t:....1 11_U F.....CTOh
II
-/
PHM.: I. JU
rJ I ::'
F /l.~
:I ..i1 I Y
1.
:'IE I I -:Li; rUh, J 1- t',1) I 1:.1_ I ED
HEHV IE: T Tllhr i- 1".1_' i t:.1_ I eLl
1 I I - I 1 (;; 1- c. ~I : I ;""\ h J
I I .~ EC 1)i"JU:
...
;-!:.[tE::Tf-\ [.;.J ril
C.Yt LE LE~,ll iTH
U?FT: /1_. ll_l..l::
1
1_ h I I I'_':'L. L,..W:. ....1, ILUi',c, - UY I"I.JVl:,1 ,c_r. I
'I
()
l.;.:. _ iBC:'U"ji)
':-4;:
14_
THhl1 -~ 11 ;HT
Lt- ,: T
,ll-'h I It-,I IU '.U
j .:. ':
II
-.I II 11::11i) 1.1
(I
l 1-' _ r <I_.U, J li
Llr: i Tl1Ld~ I IL_' f
... i..r: IT 'v 11~1)....r:.
....11 )11 "-c.L1 ~a:.L
(,t:.F hi 1 I {
:1'1')1:. ..=-: if
'I
:...JI:: _ rl<UII, W
1':" 4 f1
t 4/~, \.i
(I
r'11 M
( ,
:UIIIHt'I'il'ILI
( I
L 11 I ,-,I,U, iLl
I J( 1"\ \1'lIJ1 II ill
IJ
1"L:
_J
II
( )
II
4.' -
III
I-II
'J~
.1
. .
...- '
~
,(Li;.. H,-'r,:::::r.: rr Ci'l::'
C\ I I .
, ,
,..,,-
;'1 I\,'~JYEN I
,-ltJ.4L Y = I::
t--::.r-lIt~T HI"H I:;'ILII_:: hli H,JL! ,~~.J......: N'Y'€.
[1,.,-1 E. F r1 F E{.,t Hili Ik TI)Tf--.L Tf'~:;"F 1 C
**.~~~~*~~~~*~***********~~~****~~~
LE:. ,'c..L I:l- -::,E.F- V r CE
_,j~ I Ui::;'H T I I ,,'J -;:) /
C:hlT1C....L Ni:: VOL
L~111G~L ~/W JuL
I...h 1 T I C.ML :;:,Ul':
D
~_4
_":':1.1
1.:U~
~****~**-~*~~~~*******~~*********~~*~*
LhiJE
l.iUn THB:::I)~JD
/"1.:1'.,1 l"; 1 DTH
LMI\lE C,t:uhE fh r'
::.uUTHl='uUI'lU
t';CV l": 1 Dl"H
t:.h.= T JOU, ~L1
Mi) J l-i I Lt-, H
lr.EETBOUNLI
r t:)'J ~ I DTH
1
R. . L:.t..l F... . 1::' u fi. . 1..:. lJ R. . 12.0
or 1':' (i , 1_ i) -r 1:.11 T 1':'.0
L 1':' () L 1..... ,I r 1_ I) T 1..:. tJ
L. 1.... ) L 1: II T I_ II T 1.... IJ
L 1_ L 1.L U
,-
...
4
C'
-'
I,
'-
tK ~TH8C urJ[I
r';H;=F ...1_ '" ULiA1l::. =
.. 01..: I HbC UiJLi E:.i;.. I f..Ui ~Li
l"E:: TE OU~.j[l
Lt::rT
THkU
ii. I.:.HT
4... _
.:...111
l.J ( '5 -u....) 1-'0,. rl 1(".. ,.. 1"
1117
';"':'l~31)
1 (. ~ c~ )
1.;.':-1
_/('1.'2.';;)
1 : :. (Iv 3 1
4 ::.~,
U(II'1)
"luRTH8,:i1A.lll
.=,(IIJTHt:lOU: ~ ~
EM : -j GCd J. lU
WE: / fOUtJD
I r; ue r - ( I. ) l_ 1_ .,L [',lJ:: t:.:: ( rt, 1-11-..1 j-U.,f ~:III_ r Ft.,( ro;:;.
1 (I ()
III II -I
10 IJ ~I
II) II ;1
PHA._,.i:~.jG
ru =
c./lJ
T I ,,{ I (
4
81..1 I H II I,~l- 1- ',0 HJ_ I.: U \!".j I I H u c.hLMf-)
Elu rH TIj:;1 f ;;1_ TE'C i'l_l.1 (W 1 j l-t uvc:.r,L?,t.)
" - I J \'i t- I':U : / in)
. ,
. .,.
P~[ t:: = Th I ....:.1 .,1
a: YC LE LE'~I_, TH
LI:.r--',- : /1... r CLl::.
1
1_ I
(I
:: c.( (Ii Ji,
l_hITII."I_ L,.,i::: '.,.1 IllY' - }-.It t 1_Iv't:tUn
';:"\11 -f; I I_,f I r
LeFT
.:- "I_ L.
(, 1
_ ,-,IXI -121_ I, JLI
1 _ I )
-- - I
I=.H - I [ ,-11_ ,.J!J
I.. - I
,ICoI-l'rin:! D
...:. ':.
,.Jl: = rL.uUHiJ
._ 1 ~I
1 ;()
LLr'T Tllf\lJ I .-11::.' I
. tJr-llj I" I :L..U: il=.
"'U, III I i:lI )uL
( :"i- hl_, I I (
.',.-.'" r j'iE. JT
;11..11 IH[lli:,JLI
Lpl =
,:.7...
II
~ 1 /1-1
.1 II I rHt:'1 II Ii lU
... I
'-1-1 _ T LillI l.-ll!
_ -; 71
'L.(
II
,.J/ I~
~'k. = I bUUt.l-lf:
1 _ : v
1 ilJ.
IJ
N/';
..,~ ~
(/
i'll ,~
l.
.'
~
~ .
.
APPENDIX
f1
....
\.
-'
PROJECT ?? L~(J "':._ / /'
CALC. BY
J
;{imJey-Horn
Ii t../ '7'1 r /_
Ih.? 0 ATE -; 1,/ ~
-4_1 I' /A
CHECKED BY
DATE
SHEET NO
REVISED BY I
OF
DATE
-
... \J '
~~
I /
- ...... """
10,-'
..I !,,_J
:7 ,
, I
, ,
~.~ 1
l)
- \1)
,~ ~
~J '<
s .: 17"
r<- f./ Z. L.
,... S 70
.., I ("
(' ~
o ,'0::.
....
I
-~
- \JJ1
. I
,.e...-
lI/ ./
"Jz.-"> ~ r--
;, ~ /
J"1.J a).?
1_ /frJ ~
r :; '/I
IO/1.-J '" r
1" --. /
, - .: ""-.........
I" ('
It) ~
'\
1",/ _~'I'
r _) ., / J ( -/; I)...:;'
-
.J'I,
"
I' /') 1 ~
,- ,__
/ if ;(
</01 ~
;4S r--'
7":' I
_v
~
j
f. f 1
-
~...
I
1..,//7 I
- <-/5:; I
r' 1~3' if
~
....) -..9 '
~~N
"'l.J\J)
"""\
.......
f1
\."
i
I
I
,
"
t'\
I
,~
[&(iml'~lf.H::r n
?ROJECT c? L~/") -=- / /' r-j / ;,(
:ALC. BY .!h? DATE -;/ /""..':.. CHECKED BY
-tlJ}
J <-;j C
-)
'i (/1'7 n (.-
SHEET NO
REVISED BY I
DATE
----
-"'2
#
Ll.
~
c-
1<
- -)
-
~ 'fO~
(" 15Y
..--:-' -
, -I: -) i,;r
__, /" i"''Jj "-
(i,"';::> /" ~ - 0 '<.I
~~)2/\"\ / ) ~
c ,_ / I
C? ( Y IL." )'
~~ - ~ "
::> ~,~, - I 1, /
-Cy, \, I /~I.,., /
) ,,/"/7 /
---7..J /
.0/" ~
'1. --
P \ \-
"'~ 0 \
-' : ; )
l,'
):: .. ~{'L-
-" .... '-'" ~ (?-c ?;
,... ':: ! I ~G/
I ~ro r 3 LII
.. ..,
I') _ 4 ...-~.. c.; 5,1- f:Jr 2/1{,-;I
,;,'- /1'1-) ~
:; - 0 ,,0 ")-;; I~" ;-
.... d;) r" )
" II)
"\
;-- \\ \'
::-'0
.,
.
'.,
V'-!
<.')
"{ \lj
<"\ ~
'J .<
~O"-
To Tf2-L /, /r v
/.U7 r .~-)
\./' .:: t: ( I
p,/-( fE/ (. ~{/~
,
/I..} 5 {" () u !-c:.
I .
---- -
OF
DATE
r::: "I
J-,,'V
Pot--- t.. 77
? .... 0J .,:-$0 .,
~ L L, r 1":!J1t.! II
.J'I'1--7 ~J ~l r !i~-
lot.!j->
r;;;5" ~ - ..., i
L ~()N I
. NV) f \
i \
)i
...-Jr-1 ! ,\ C '(
./
~
"Ou ~... ~
J 1 L ~::: ~~
to 2.-~
'q5=.'
51Q 1
f1
- ....
\
c
~
I'
PROJECT t-?T()r_ /1" rot 'If /--1
CALC. BY Ih!? DATE '7/,10;;' ~ CHECKED BY
..;: 'J'j 'V 5&
- II -; 1&
...) j1e
I -J ),. v
).....l, ') ':0
.'
-
l\
'W)
1
v
T
"
,
f\.
~ 'LIIO
J ...- 10'!..-
l.:. 1.:-' / t/i-
,.c.- I, 0
,'- J"~ 1
:'-"' (
q-\
;1 -" )(>
In j ). ~
f,.,'J r ')
,
.
SHEET NO
REVISED BY I
~J J
0/1;, / T
sf.; ~ 0
I Kimley.Horn I
lit./10 n(.-
DATE
.
I J
'oJ
\o.:t
('\.) \lJ
~ ~
....
~"
~
OF
DATE
-~;
t}..
J) '" ~ t. -1'2.- I
"') <- 110 k!
,,) J ~ ,(""'~e,..llU I
1't. --> -~
2.13 -.) II r I~vr
Iv -, 'J' ~ 11~J'
~ 1J..... I ~J,
N "
~
fJ
\.i
\
0<
J....
I
k - -
P/-1 /'e-, '{.. /1/- /t'J:;; f Ov, ....
!J...JCJ.5 -;I<-/~. C,( IcIJd/~
.5Jo!.-IT -; Ycf CoG. S~:l..,Vf / ~OJt./ DU~':
l. ........ .,.... ..:........ ......_.......-...c..- ................
~
SHEET NO
REVISED BY I
IJ ~I
1':\ .
.%
I Kimfey.Horn !
PROJECT F? J=n (_ /,/' ~ ,-a-I I '7 l /---f
CALC. BY Ih!? DATE 7/1/-;"-: CHECKED BY
J~j
..;---~
~
~
J
[iU19 "fro
DATE
-
\'...1
~
v
')
I ~
....1
I
,'.. \v'1
I.......)
q{
....._,
""-----
IS
mL.
t- /'
:c(,,~ .(. ,~o'Z.-
1
'.1
t.""
~ ~J
~ ~
(' J '"
, I-J ("
r~ I'e r~((_ f GUlL -r>...(.)':> GL)/+-" ,v,.. .....
IL'C~~//2..(A-L Et(8~J.-}~<-
17D/o = /5.3~ I/PH L
lIIl""'"'"_
OF
DATE
I yO; i }o<1t.J cJ1
<l~ ~ ,...11{. I
3 ~ l~o.-
&ij (:1- ~
cJJ;
(:
....
\.
0..
~
.. .r....
. .
.. -....... .. .........._._....__#1:. - a
PROJECT ?J??() <"'_ /!""' ~I If /-1
CALC. BY /h!? DATE 7/,/;;.; CHECKED BY
_I I I 't' ,~Ul?
I~
- ::Tr
N
" /:-1
'!)
JJ
(:& \
~o1
L;f:-
'J
,../.
(~ I.
"\ ~J
:; :::.
t;'J "
')
,
.d
,.~-
.,
SHEET NO OF
REVISED BY , DATE
J t<~ 3
,\1) J
7
I KimJey.Horn I
liU 19 ("1(.".
DATE
-
~J11
----
Cc
d
~A 1<--':'" I/'-.J Cu ,..-,2 ,;..~ ~.)o "-'...JI"-~ ,U/2../J";
8o~<..( VI-" 0
.. .
.~
~ ~
-----.J
I;
~\.,;
\
o
).
:=y Tc. l'...J.J Irl....-
c.
.- .
"?.,,,,!~:..~.
. .. .
..~._ _~"""""'t..'
_..:~.. _. I.
"-.I. . . ,
SHEET NO
REVISED BY ,
I[-J
-/IL
.'
--;:r
I Kimley.HOrnJ
PROJECT t<?- L:-() c... 1,/'1 r-1!"7 ( /-1
CALC. BY !h!? DATE 71//.;.~ CHECKED BY
If.- I 'i~ 0 ({S
.c ~
Ii L/ 19 () (.-
DATE
.
~l
./
-
, "1 'L
I
,
c, t.\.
;0
~oq
t.. .~
- I
r----
,/
"
~ ;;: ~
,/
I ,
)
J
-.!
'i)
~ \!}
..... -
c:"J \:
'IIr": .
OF
DATE
---\
Jf)
q;J /:(:; J
~
--<----LL:;, ~...,
"2..11 ---
r--.. /'" i
<j J 2., IS <
~
\."\
i'
I)
.., ,--, ,-, . I {o:::,."...:o.;,)/./~T
/ J....J ~ U.) 1 ~_, ,o. L i,. ,.:..~C ^oJ 7. , - ~
, .
... ....... ....
..--- -.
.... :~..:
.. __ . .......__~.....,." ~ .a....
.
.-<
PRO J E C T F> "Z-(1 c_ / /'
CALC. BY 1"."';;-- DATE "7/';';":-
.
1\
/ "\ ii'
:; J, I
------
:.. ,v
-'
----
'j 't.. 2/
rJ <'- I~-""
~) .c- -~ I
-5{
(:'>
:"-1
55 -.>
~,
lIr"":
~
,
i KimJev.Hor.,'J
,c....1 '7 ( /....1
/1l/11 r(,...
SHEET HO
REVISED 8~ I
Yt I
'r
<-J
OF
DATE
CHECKED BY
DATE
-
tV
5",,)-
.E,'j-<>
J
,..II.U ,
I j;- J .J:i
1.P ---:>
11 J.. I
.s:.- .......
...
-0
'1
'..J
-.!
(I)
l \l}
;; ~
\J ",
F) (
fFl~~ 1((jU/~
I ,A.-) { ~ :J v ,.::
(:: /1 c) )
::'D /-f /~ EI. CI roC f: -" ;-C 1_./..1 /- '-
II B I).J ~ /1/ '0 0 c.I i"; -
~--...--.. ..
.-... ..........- ........,,...........
JROJECT ?;J;;:-()C- j/' r.-I 7l/--,f
ALC. BY ,1h.?- DATE "7/1/-;' ~ CHECKED BY
~---
I ~
e'
I Kim/ell-Horn I
I..fcJ1'1 ('.(.-
~.":
~
,
OF
DATE
DATE
SHEET NO
REVISED BY I
~
.fiJ..
...
\n""
?~ (f:rrt::-' (/_ 1'...-.) 0 ,,{) i~ 7,..".:.,1....)..;
C08Ite1'-CIA--C 8 TCI!.JJ/'H-
/0%
lq
~ '
..
;,'j
"
;1
'( .f)
-
.11'1.
~
.(. ?
tJ'l"
...
..
,
-.!
(~ ~J
c':\ :::.
<'J ~
-------.J
I
\r
0\.
;)
i....._
..,"~ ..
0.' ..;J - ---.. .... - .. #'00
... _. _ .__--..___ ....~_ a_ ~...
I
.'
~
Kimley.Horn ~1
PROJECT ?'".?: 7='(') C-. / ro ,A-I .., ( /---1
CALC. BY /h!? DATE ,/1,/::,-:" CHECKED BY
o~ ,4
~
f!.
\~ I
'iI
.....lV
U
(~
,
,,I
'J
'o..t
tl) I.
'"' 'l)
.::; ~
C'"J "'
r;
'1l./ 1'1 f) I.,..
lIr"'""" -=-
OF
DATE
SHEET NO.
REVISED BY I
JI
DATE
~~
~;
to/ /8 .
.:J ,J
~--~
~ 50 J~
/1'1, .....r.' "'..-I...J-) 1:5~,':"j.J,v2"JJ/
" )/1,(1 E./- u p-C ,..::, f- v....
el Tc/!.url L
l:' .o., ....-
....
-.-.... _:.----.....-..~
-)-
PROJECT t.? L-.-();::_ / ~ /'-=-/ n /---1
CALC. BY J4:;:;- DATE -;///-....: CHECKED BY
~-~ I ~ 1I't..
I'\J t- J".'
l L, r ..~
V
& -/
\; '1
Y\/(
I N ~
r') '" 1\/
1'r\I
No-.
~') 'I "..._ItA
ll, i" 1')0
,,~/;!,
] LL
'OJ
~~ -
- 0 J
.J
~
(.')
"\ \1)
" ....
<"\ -
('".J '"
rr
" "f\
I
"
t., /3/
_.: 05
(' .-L 1
1 rr
o 1'Y"
'\9
SHEET NO
REVISED BY~ I
JJ'/
~D J I J i
)5 J t 0
\ '^
/
f'6r!L flOC/Ii- II--J~ ~ ovT:
~r-':'! CC c~iY. rc: /_;...J/j-(.
1-5, ? =- ~/:5,7 / jJ ~ ! ~ 6 0 j ~ '" r,S
.l
l!:imlel'.Horn I
Ii c.j '7<; ,.., ( _
DATE
---
\-
.)..
.... '1
-- \..'" ,-
8/11 -'!
.J '- .
fo V -- c'.32
'..
~- {,1~
'11 fr> 11:J-)
FIt
_ .5,L'T
..--- ~
--;'"
OF
DATE
'-
"
B3
,--5i~ J ~
rlIlJI,.:.
~.:.
I ,,~Ov:.~
"<I~ -. I J
~~f, "_35 jW) '\
\~ ;'_/<10
J ! I r_-"
!.. Vl ----.:-:-
I&f:;,)j';:,t \
"71~-J ~ .y
^II .... I') ~~.')"
1 'V'"
~
I
\......
t'\.
)
--. ........-.....
SHEET NO OF
REVISED BY I DATE
P'I At
</") i lof
;-;4 J
Jv1
e>
-.
,
KhnJey-Horn
PROJECT ??7-()(_ j/'
CALC. BY /h!? DATE -;/,1-;,:
d111 ~~31,
~ -"Ii
-:;) J ;;_1
~-I f ( /--l
liU 10 ro(L"
DATE
CHECKED BY
--
);1
l/IJ
~1
)1
."
('vr /-<1 /":; 1!"
f<-/) '-<:'
JI~
\::: ~ 1,
~
r;; :} r:
o'j
.. ,
113
"
.
J
~
'~
"'\ \jJ
~ -::.
....J "
-' I" (.~r- ((. ")u,_ I ~ .J 0 .:.v / " "j t.,I ,I J ;-
r;~ i ~ c; ~,-l--I/'~
/,3 "/0
:: .]0'::7 vf?tI
- - -I".
~ ..
j3;:;_~ \ ~,~,P
--,~
'-0 1l-G; ~
7 ~"
/
-----.J
...--- ----..--.-.-
\"...
~
Jj
. !..'''';.~':
i
..-
.- . ....
) 1 L.:,o11 1.%7 JS'~ 'C7.5 ,
.;
{7;(.,
... '\ ,./lU
:5/6 - ~
~ . ,
...~ " 153~ ~'J
~ 1. ,.,
{." V
.I
)1 I,qo I
l\ I c,15?J
I
,";oJ) I o'r-
- ::.
~'-i ~ r;
;;}" OJ
/,.J
-------.J
PROJECT ?~F()C- j /"
CALC. BY Ih!? DATE "71,/.....~
~&ll~'
I .
, . ,I
-it J ~';:;~
1IIr""':=
------
I'
--,
Kimley.Horn
r-I Il ~f
11'-119 n(...
CHECKED BY
DATE
SHEET NO OF
REVISED BY I DATE
.30'1
'r) I ] $71
q35 t.
~
"I
.
J
-./.
P} ,
~~
.... ...
r"J 1:
\.
o
^
j
11#Q ,,(....4-<,.- T'JI..u':;
~.;-11.. 'r !) ~/CC <:::-x, /'E':>-A.//rL
Ie 775 vPD
...t.._. ..
::i ~~-:-
--
. __.-..... \.....-=.-..:...____....................d.
.. ---
.I.. .....
-;-
I KimJey.Horn I
PROJECT lfz,po c- / ~, ,,4-/ J 'fl.,.t..-f Cfl/19.0(,..
CALC. BY Ih~ DATE 7/,;';;.-:. ~HECKED BY DATE
~.') 7..J :; .
,1..-
J ;) 1;'77)
1 'L:'~
'\ fSrn
~
'\
SHEET NO. OF
REVISED BY DATE
Ote; J 1
;.1
~~
6'
L\l'l,
\3-;)
\ )
f\'~~
I I. ;
.-'\ J .\ "'J I~
"J AI l' - , ~ ,/'J, :: -:
_~;I \.., '....1 '{!1 C:..
, ,-1,,:7 " I
. 11 ~.?
~
~ </~ 0
, ,., , \ oJ ~ L tJ
\
\
J
'..
., ~. r
~,~
~
..I
C;
I:;'
~
\U
\~
0\u
~ ~
<)
("J "'<
.--. -
"1-1. ~
1
<_ Ir)
,..
CF-f-/c.c: ?O!..~/.A $StG-Io....J,A...(C1--JT
'\'
~4 1
C'
.J1
\;..
J
\r
~
Jj
..
. 1.";"',_ _ "
.. "t,!j-J .-1
· . J
,--.
........
e-. _ _.
.. ..-.... - ~~~.. ................. &
\r
~
I
^ ole: I) ^1
<(;r..,.l...Ys v1 v~. ~
-- 'I " v.t. .(
I 1, '1 ~ (,.'
~,~'- rrf //\ It/gut
. :. ",,",1..-
........J......-......4. .--z.'-.... _. -':1-- .",.,;,"'''''-.. ..
.
.
--.
,
.
KinJ/ey.Horn
PROJECT F~p() (_ 1/'1 /.-/ 7"( ~(
CALC. BY"/"~ DATE -;1,/-;..:: CHECKED BY
r
{jr.l1'l rot".
DATE
SHEET NO.
REVISED BY I
-
.(" 'I~
(9
l\~
':'.)
~
~
(~ ~J
~ ~
<'\
'J "{
"PM rt: -~u rI 0 <-,C I~..J::', "... r..::
.
.~I)n M /,....)/ I/:_I/"'::
:5 c . ~ ~ f/; I ( ,-
--- ...
.--
..... .
..---
OF
DATE
9'
.J
.5 ~ --:J
11,5 --.
.,L
,../IU (
-------.1-
.'"
1 \
//(,
\rl
..::
...
~
r
~)
'\
I
PROJECT t<?vO~ I/"' r-I '7v/--1
CALC. BY _1hz? DATE -,/,/-;..: CHECKED BY
_J
. .
, .
c
.~
~
t~ ~)
1 ~
<"\
'J "'
- ". -
--
r
Kim/elf' Horn
I..{U'19 n(/"
SHEET NO
REVISED BY I
DATE
-
/
~1
~
\~"...,:...
';"1
f c::r...lL f/ 0 c..II.!- 7'.A-' 0
I U -r ao I--t /.-(
c.ur--y
7U d_ 1--'_-
(0 Q,
......-
OF
DATE
IOiJ
1,s7J-
,..1/(,) I
.....\
/l,'
J
T
",....
11
\t-
O\.
~
...--- "..
..: .~:n ;.-1
~..t-;' -' I
. ~.. _._ _ _ _ ....-......-..--or
_ .. .....,.. ......,J............. ",.~"::"_",,,,,,,""""""'-..r:1I..""~.'
. ,
. ~ .
, ...--
~
.
~
..
I Kim/eY.HOr";J
PROJECT ???o c. J I"" fr-/ .., ( ~f
CALC. BY Ih!? DATE '71t1-",:: CHECKED BY
fjl/19 f',(r
SHEET NO
REVISED BY I
I
DATE
--
.
~~"
t{-/"
c;;,
ri!SJ'"
"
"\ ./
;"
\.../
')
,()
'..l
(I) 4J
~ ~
'"
'J 't;:
IJ t/ "
V .>
r
() (. I '- 'f f
'-
~, ,
, ,
::. ~/.!'
2.17~
TO C() M }of
Il.-P
.:.
OF
DATE
.,
-l ~ r
- ;..J .1 rV ,
~~ -- ,.
7
,.
11"~7
. .. .
..l.......... ~4.........,.........."'~ ...~.
..
PROJECT ?? L;(J -::-. I/" ,k/ Il. /A
CALC. BY /k?- DATE -;/,/,. ~ CHECKED BY
\
. f
..
.
,
.
. ..- v
,)
'u
(,..!.
(.1) \tJ
~ ~
<"\
"J ~
~.
,.
Kimley.Horn
'i l/ 1<7 ("I ( -
DATE
SHEET NO
REVISED BY I
I
..
r--cJJ'
~ I...
('
\?"
IlO->
IJ) 1c't-./V fl (
f I' f.l I.)!, .(
(I ...,,: )) Jrr / crt
" ,.
_.., ~ J L...,:)
)lJ/_ -
,:- , '" 0)
<=f' t-
c::- .;1
OF
DATE
'II"'"": -= ·
,.IIV -(
-
:3 7..- J ?) A-I ,.
53 J. J
frJf\I
Ir)"
..' -
... ....
~
'"
1
1
\:'
....
.. r's"
...,.-_..
.. _.......- .tt...... ~.
./ . ,
,- ..
..
., ,~
4 " ~ .
.
I .
.,. ,
I Kim/ell-Horn I
PROJECT "F?-;;::-O r_ //'1 .-:1-/ tl /--1
CALC. BY Ih? DATE -11,1-;.; CHECKED BY
{j l/19 ,'., (,..
DATE
--,
,
OF
DATE
SHEET NO
REVISED BY ,
I
IIJ--r&/ /)(,L /~("'-(f.! (()~ 70 ,JJO 1"..10 ~a~ )
I~ ~/o I'/~ /'E/-~. filL /Z.O" LU/t7-' rul'l4..J.s
c~
J
:')
\u
\l
(.1) \u
~ ~
<'\
'J "
~
1:1 '::> J
.... -- -
,....: .. I
. .
- ._--
. -.- -
....t- ......... _ ,_ .~.""".'~f
. .
r ~) ..
I
t',
.. lII"'"""
r
. .. "
,
, .
f
~
11th -. ..
ErimJev.Horn I
PROJECT ?~ ~'(J r_ /1" r-I '"rt /--f
CALC. BY /.h!? DATE ,1,1-;.,: CHECKED BY
J~'/o
1ft./1Ct ("1(.-
DATE
SHEET NO
REVISED BY r
tJ 1'/0
J
OF
DATE
".~ !
-
~
4-'
-. ~ .,
\~ ~
'1,-1 J I
It.
~~
~J,r, -' .,P.,.,'-\\! \~
'\~ ~ "
/ <Q)
\" .. A
IV -./ -,
.~.. .--
-J
Q ~ V
6iiP '" .V @ , '-
.\ '
\J.J
.
.,.-IV ,C ~ \ I
, ?':J
~'r,? - -- ,-0
.... - ~
'1 V....
.-
l
[
., ~ ,.:
r
..,
"\(~
^-.V?
.~
V
, ~..:
? '
.
0\
~
3:'1
GEJ
; ,
- I
)
t..
~
,,'
1
;')
(~
~ ~J
~ ~
....
cv'\
'- -
/'
.)
Hi (~~( L
I.....
, ,
.-
l'oJ I
II... t-
,- :>
v,.;:.
. -,-w-
~
. ---.
.. J. ......_..... _ .... ." -.-......................~... .. -
-t
-D
cr
-f
o
n.J
JJ
CO
(Y)
o
~
:::r
0....
r-
I
toO
::;)
<
~
00
52
,. ,
,
-I Lc ~
I
j
'1
, 0274P
063086-1
NOTICE OF MODIFICATION OF ADOPTED DEVELOPMENT ORDER
Development Order is
a Florida general
(15)(f), Fla Stats
THIS Notice of Modif ication of Adopted
hereby provided by Quantum Associates,
partnership, pursuant to Section 380 06
(1985), this ~I ~I of July, 1986, as follows
1 A development order was adopted by the City of Boynton
Beach (Ordinance No 84-51) pursuant to Chapter 3~Fla Stats
,
(1984), covering that certain property located in Palm Beach
County, Florida, more particularly described in Exhibit "A",
attached hereto and made a part of hereof
2 The Development Order became effective upon final passage
of said Ordinance 84-51 on the 18th day of December, 1984
3 The Development Order was modified by the City of
Beach (Ordinance No 86-11) pursuant to Chapter 380, Fla
(1985), covering that certain property located in Palm
County, Florida, more particularly described in Exhibit
attached hereto and made a part hereof
Boynton
Stats
Beach
"An,
4 The modified Development
final passage of said Ordinance No
1986
Order became effective upon
86-11 on the 3rd day of June,
5 The Development Order and Modified Development Order may
be examined at the office of the City Clerk of Boynton Beach, 120
E Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida
6 The Development Order and Modified Development Order
constitute land development regulations applicable to the subject
property
7 The recording of this Notice shall not constitute a lien,
cloud, or encumbrance on the subject property, nor actual or
constructive notice of any such lien, cloud, or encumbrance
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Notice to
be executed on the date aforesaid
Signed, Sealed and Delivered
in the presence of
'itj{.. t It" ~~ , /n A
/) .
I ,(1.' (
I /iCt(..{ t '~'-1 (~ ,
/ /
QUANTUM AS~TES
~~f~
Edward B Deutsch--
XK~X~~K~K~X Partner
By
cr
~ STATE OF FLORIDA
.JJ
o COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
0-
Ul
-D
cr
:T
en
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this il
day of July, 1986, by Edward B Deutsch, XX~ partner,
behalf of Quantum Associates, a Florida general partnership
Itlft r:" ()././ //
Nota r,y Publ(ic
,
r-
---
on
(NOTARY SEAL)
My Commission Expires
}I("'- ~y fl' '~l'r STA T'E OF FlO'RIDJ:
CS j"3 26 1937
.:.; .......'-. .:r<.AL i: ~SL.n,' r-:Cf U~-JD
RETURN TO ,)
DAVID S PRESSLY, ESQ
POST OFFICE BOX 3888
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402
THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY
DAVID S PRESSLY, ESQ
POST OFFICE BOX 3888
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402
I
. #
~
EXHIBIT "A"
OVERALL BOUNDARY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A Tract of land lying partially in Sections 16, 17, 20 and 21, Township
45 south, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, said Tract being
more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest
corner of said Section 17; thence North 1014'39" East, along the West
line of Section 17, a distance of 1318.10 feet to a- poi~ the
intersection with the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue, as recorded in
O.R4 Book 1738, Page 1686, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida; thence with a bearing of North 89004'32" East, along the
cel'terline of N.W. 22nd Avenue, a distance of 778.37 feet to the point
of Beginning; thence North 1044'39" East, a distance of 1247 06 feet to
the South right of way line of L.W.D.D. Lateral 21; thence North
89008'49" East, along the South right of way line of L.W.D.D.
Lateral 21, as recorded in O.R. Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public
Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, a distance of 635.93 feet to the
centerline of the L.W.D.D. Equalizing Canal E-4 Canal, as recorded in
O.R. Book 1732, Page 612 of Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida: thence along the centerline of the above described E-4 Canal
with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of North 10032'52"
East, a radius of 750.00 feet, a central angle of 4004'17", and an arc
length of 53.29 feet; thence continue along the centerline of the E-4
Canal, with a bearing of North 12035'00" East, a distance of 320.69 feet
to a point of curve; thence with a curve, to the left having a radius of
6500.00, a central angle of 3028'30", and an arc length of 394.23 feet;
thence North 9006'30" East, a distance of 1979.16 feet to a point on the
North Line of Section 17; thence with a bearing of North 89016'39" East,
along the North line of Section 17, a distance of 1964.50 feet; thence
South 0002'11" East, a distance of 2625.18 feet; thence North 89008'49"
East, a distance of 368.96 feet to a point on the North right of way
line oC~.W. 22nd-Avenue$as recorded in O.R. Book 1738, Page 1686 of the
Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence South 19027'31"
East, a distance of 50.00 feet to the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue:
thence with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of North
75029'49" East, a radius of 1637.02 feet, a central angle of 9053'58",
and an arc length of 282.85 feet to a point; thence North 12002'41"
East, a distance of 915.72 feet; thence North 0031'11" East, a distance
of 399.70 feet; thence North 89012'37" East, a distance of 413.21 feet;
thence South 88022'56" East, a distance of 1349.70 feet to a point on
the West right of way line of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad; thence
South 0028'21" East, along the West right of way line of the Railroad, a
distance of 1309.09 feet to a point on the centerline of N.W. 22nd
Avenue; thence North 88027'31" West, along the centerline of N.W. 22nd
Avenue a distance of 672.97 feet; thence South 0033'53" East, a distance
of 1306.69 feet; thence South 88045'31" East, a distance of 333.51 feet
to a point on the West right of way of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad;
thence with a bearing of South 14008'23" West, ~long the West right of
way of the railroad, a distance of 1312.49 feet; thence South 0033'53"
East, a distance of 26.69 feet; thence South 13015'22" West, a distance
of 920.57 feet; thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 187.60 feet;
thence with a bearing of North 0049'21" West, a distance of 200.00 feet:
thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 218.00 feet; thence South
0049'21" East, a distance of 200.00 feet; thence North 88050'04" West, a
distance of 40.00 feet; thence South 0049'21" East, a distance of 556.84
feet; thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 3617.26 feet to a point
on the centerline of the above described centerline of the E-4 Canal:
thence with a bearing of North 5018'14" West, a distance of 153.13 feet,
thence with a curve to the right having a radius of 450.00 feet, a
central angle of 15036'44", and an arc length of 122 62 feet; thence
North 10018'30" East, a distance of 988.60 feet to a point of curve;
thence with a curve to the left having a radius of 450.00 feet, a
central angle of 18020'00", and an arc length of 143 99 feet; thence
with a bearing of North 8001'30" West, a distance of 1255.14 feet to a
point on the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue; thence with a bearing of
South 89004'32" West, along the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue a
distance of 817.85 feet more or less to the point of Beginning.
Containing 591.55 acres more or less and subject to easements and rights
of way of record.
o
N
..c
o
0-
LI1
..c
a-
::t-
CD
RECORD VERIFIED
PALM BEACH COUNTY FLA.
JOHN B DUNKLE
ClEMK CIRCUIT COURT
I
r:..!.i~
-'--
Ie
'I-
"":1 :'I.
uv~"t
.-.
rr
er-
e
ru
fI1
.JJ
00
en
-
..
-
-
:x;
.oc;
N
.
~
e,.:,
co
Q]
.
...
, .
.
111786-1
1024P
NOTICE OF MODIFICATION OF ADOPTED DEVELOPMENT ORDER
THIS Notice of Modification of Adopted Development Order is
hereby provided by Quantum Associates, a Flor ida general
partnership, pursuant to Section 380.06(15) (f), Fla. Stats.
(1985), this ~ of November, 1986, as follows
1 A development order was adopted by -the City" of Boynton
Beach (Ordinance No. 84-51) pursuant to Chapter 380, Fla. stats
(1984), covering that certain property ("Property") located in
Palm Beach County, Florida, more particularly described in Exhibit
"A", attached hereto and made a part of hereof
2 The Development Order became effective upon final passage
of said Ordinance 84-51 on the 18th day of December, 1984
3. The Development Order was modified by the City of Boynton
Beach (Ordinance No. 86-11) pursuant to Chapter 380, Fla. Stats.
(1985), covering the Property
4. The modified Development Order became effective upon
final passage of said Ordinance No. 86-11 on the 3rd day of June,
1986.
5. The Development Order was further modified by the City of
Boynton Beach (Ordinance No. 86-37) pursuant to Chapter 380, Fla.
Stats. (1986), covering the Property.
\ I I (f) 0 6. The modified Development Order became effective upon
) I~ Y final passage of said Ordinance No 86-37 on the 21st day of
. October, 1986.
o
-f
Lri
o
C-
O
a-
t::)
lJ1
CO
7. The Development Order and Modified Development Orders may
be examined at the office of the City Clerk of Boynton Beach, 120
E. Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida.
8. The Development Order and Modified Development Orders
constitute land development regulations applicable to the subject
property
9 The recording of this Notice shall not constitute a lien,
cloud, or encumbrance on the subject property, nor actual or
constructive notice of any such lien, cloud, or encumbrance
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Notice to
be executed on the date aforesaid.
Signed, Sealed and Delivered
in the_~~ of.
(1) ~~_________
(2) -iiy/tw a~
;/
QUANTUM~OCIATES
/~:: '
BY:~ ~~'-(,/
Edward B. Deutsch
Partner
THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY
RETURN TO
J DAVID S. PRESSLY-, ESQ.
POST OFFICE BOX 3888
WEST PALM BEACH, FL334Q2
DAVID S. PRESSLY, ESQ.
POST OFFICE BOX 3888
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402
.....
-f
t.n
o
0-
o
CT
o
U1
CD
.......
.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF BROWARD
The foregoing instrument was acknowleoqed before me
day of November, 1986, by Edward B. Deutsch, partner, on
Quantum Associates, a Florida general partnership.
~/h 4'tuv>><-L-
Notar Publigf
f~9TARY' SEAL)
')<:) ~
r, .".z. '. ~~
, c LJ
r~ ~ ,. ~
0 (0 -I -
;" 2:> ~'l
,-, r ;J;] -?
,/ ..-
1/, c> <~ ,-
~
t i.; ~..
"; e: , "
--
My Commission Expires
NOTARY PUBLIC 5T ATE OF FLORIDA
MY CO'\/,\ I 55 10:.) t:/P KEs Fe: 26 987
eC:-IDED THRU GENERAL JI\SU:\-N(E UND
1024p
-2-
this c21 rl
behalf of
.
." J
..~
E'{HI3IT "A"
A Tract of land lying partially in Sections 16, 17, 20 and 21, Township
45 south, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, said Tract being
more particularly described as follows Commencing at the Southwest
corner of said Section 17: thence North 1014'39" East, along the West
line of Section 17, a distance of 1318.10 feet to a po~in the
intersection with the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue, as recorded in
O.R. Book 1738, Page 1686, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida: thence with a bearing of North 89004'32" East, along the
centerline of N.~q. 22nd Avenue, a distance of 778.37 feet to the Point
of Beginning: thence North 1044'39" East, a distance of 1247 06 feet to
the South right of way line of L.W.D.D. Lateral 21: thence North
89008'49" East, along the South right of way line of L W.D D.
Lateral 21, as recorded in O.R. Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public
Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, a distance of 635.93 feet to the
centerline of the L.W.D.D. Equalizing Canal E-4 Canal, as recorded in
O.R. Book 1732, Page 612 of Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida: thence along the centerline of the above described E-4 Canal
with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of North 10032'52"
East, a radius of 750.00 feet, a central angle of 4004'17", and an arc
length of 53.29 feet: thence continue along the centerline of the E-4
Canal, with a bearing of North 12035'00" East, a distance of 320.69 feet
to a point of curve: thence with a curve, to the left having a radius of
6500.00, a central angle of 3028'30", and an arc length of 394.23 feet:
thence North 9006'30" East, a distance of 1979.16 feet to a point on the
North Line of Section 17: thence with a bearing of North 89016'39" East,
along the North line of Section 17, a distance of 1964.50 feet: thence
South 0002'11" East, a distance of 2625.18 feet: thence North 89008'49"
East, a distance of 368.96 feet to a point on the North right of way
line oCiN.W. 22nd-Kvenue$as recorded in O.R. Book 1738, Page 1686 of the
Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida: thence South 19027'31"
East, a distance of 50.00 feet to the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue:
thence with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of North
75029'49" East, a radius of 1637.02 feet, a central angle of 9053'58",
and an arc length of 282.85 feet to a point: thence North 12002'41"
East, a distance of 915.72 feet: thence North 0031 '11" East, a distance
of 399 70 feet: thence North 89012'37" East, a distance of 413.21 feet:
thence South 88022'56" East, a distance of 1349 70 feet to a point on
the West right of way line of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad; thence
South 0028'21" East, along the West right of way line of the ~3.ilroad, a
distance of 1309.09 feet to a point on the centerline of N ~ 22nd
Avenue: thence North 88027'31" ~"1est, along the centerline of N'i"1. 22nd
Avenue a distance of 672.97 feet; thence South 0033'53" East, a distance
of 1306.69 feet: thence South 88045'31" East, a distance of 333.51 feet
to a point on the West right of way of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad:
thence with a bearing of South 14008'23" West, along the West right of
way of the railroad, a distance of 1312.49 feet: thence South 0033'53"
East, a distance of 26.69 feet: thence South 13015'22" West, a distance
of 920.57 feet: thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 187 60 feet:
thence with a bearing of North 0049'21" West, a distance of 200.00 feet:
thence North 88050'04" West, a distanc~ of 218.00 feet; thence South
0049'21" East, a distance of 200 00 feet: thence North 88050'04" West, a
distance of 40.00 feet: thence South 0049'21" East, a distance of 556 84
feet, thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 3617 26 feet to a po~nt
on the centerline of the above described centerline of the E-4 C~nal'
,
thence with a bearing of North 5018'14" ~est, a distance of 153.13 feet,
thence with a curve to the right having a radius of 450 00 feet, a
central angle of 15036'44", and an arc length of 122.62 feet, thence
iorth 10018'30" East, a dist~nce of 98S 60 feet to a point of curvp
- ,
t,ence with a curle to the lett having a radius of 450 00 feet, a
central angle of 18020'00", ~nd ~n arc length of 14j 99 feet, thence
....ith ~ bearing of north SOOl '30" \-lest, a distance of 1255.14 feet to a
pO~nt on the centerline of ~J 'I. 22nd Avenue: thence With a bearing of
Sou~h 89004'32" T'lest, along the centerline of N W 22nd l\venue a
distance of 817.85 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning
Cont~lning 591 SS acres more or less and subject to e~sements ~nd riqhts
of ....a 1 0 f ::.-ecord. "O~D VERIFIED
o RE~ . FlA
--;-A.LM e€ACH COUNTY
JOHN B DUNKLE '9"
CLERK CIRCUIT COIJE~..
N
-t
t.n
o
CL
o
r:r
o
l['l
00
OVERt\LL BOUNDARl
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
~ l _
,J_J, -: _~,:f~
~ _ -r r:::....l"i
l