AGENDA DOCUMENTS
...
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
D Prelimmary Draft D RevIsed Draft ~
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
D December 3,1996
o December 17 1996
D January 7 1997
D January 21, 1997
Date Final Form Must be Turned
into City Manager's Office
November 25,1996
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
D February 4, 1997
D February 18, 1997
D March 4 1997
D March 18, 1997
December 11, 1996
December 30, 1996
January IS, 1997
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
D AdnunlstratIon D Consent
D BId D PublIc Heanng
Dl Legal D Unfimshed Busmess
ORDINANCE
2ND READING
DESCRIPTION OF
AGENDA ITEM (attach additional sheets and supporting documentation if necessary)
y
LEGAL
A.3
cc Dev, Plan
Final SubmIttal
Date Final Form Must be
Turned into City Manager's
January 29 1997
February 12, 1997
February 29 1997
March [2, 1997
D PresentatIon
D New Business
D Other
Ordinance to amend the Quantum Park DR! (Development of Regional Impact) development order to change the
master plan use designation of lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 from Office to OfficelIndustrial/Research
and Development and the designation of lots 80, 81 and 8 ffice to Industrial/Commercial (see attached
Planning and Zoning Deparbnent Memorandum N . ~-651).
RECOMMENDATION
. pproved on second reading and final reading. Changes to the
J~' ~~~
Department Heatts Signature
\
c,~ l\,;
City Manager's i ature
L -""L (t
D.\SHARE\ WP\FORMS\AGENDAS\CITYCOM\AGENDANW WPD
~./ ~ '( N 1"() 1--
4 .,
o - 'en
y\ I. .~'J:
'(''' ';', ',..
/,,). . I./y.. J
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
X I LEGAL
A3
cc Dav, Plan
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
(j Preliminary Draft
o Revised Draft
UJ Final Submittal
Requnted City Commillioa
MeeliDI 0IteI
~ December 1 1996
o.a. Fiul Form Mu. be Turned
into City Mill..... Off"lCe
Requated City Coaunillioe
Meelin, 0....
0.. FinaJ Form MUll be Turned
illlo City Maaapr's Of'flce
January 29. 1997
n
a December 17 1996
a JlIluary 7 1991
a January 21. 1991
2ND READING
197
1
FebnJary 12. 1997
February 29. 1997
Man:h 12. 1997
)1
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
a Administrative
a Bid
ID Legal
a Consent
a Public Hearing
a Unfinished
Business
a Presentation
a New BuslDcss
Q- Other
DESCRIPTION OF
AGENDA ITEM (lIfKluddiCio_......_..lppOItiD.docv.-..,;~if....,.' PUBLIC BEA1lING-Consideration of
making a determination that the proposed changes to the Quantum Park D.K.I.
(revising the Master Site Development Plan to include industrial use, together
with office use, as a permitted land use for Lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37
and 38) do not constitute a substantial deviation a. those changes are related to c
present submittal on behalf of Beauty Group International (BGI).
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of the ordinance on first reading after the conclusion of the Public
-
Hearing. All staff co...nts and concern. on this matter will be submitted to
the City Co.ai..1on prior to the second reading and public hearing scheduled for
the Dec.-ber 17. 1996 City Commission .eetinK.
Oeputmcat II..'. Si.......
/ J)(l~ S ~H+'LL_~
City Mlupr'1 Si
......., Riteco sub8equently convwyed ita right, titles and
intereat in and to the property to Boynton Park of Commerce, Inc ,
a Florida corporation ("Soynton Park-), and, Boynton Park, in turn,
subsequently conveyed its right, title and intereat in and to the
Property to Quantum ~.oci.tes, a Florid. general partnership (the
"Developer"); and
wa.RaA8, Developer tiled with the City ~e.pective application
to amencl the Development Order, which application. were approved by
the City in Ordinance No. 86-11, Ord.1nance No 86-37, Ordinance No
88.3, O~dinance No 94-10, and Ordinance No. 94-511 and
..,;.......-
......, the term .Development Order" includes all amendments
thereto I and
Quantum A..ociat.., . Plorida general partnership
("Developer") i. the current owner and developer ot the remaining
vacant land within the project c0IIIn0I11y known .. Quantum Corporate
park at Boynton Beach Development of R~ional Impact (sometimes
hereinafter called the "Quantwa Park DRI -); and
....., Developer ba. .ubn1ttecl to the City a Notifieation of
Proposed Change to . pr.viou.ly Approved Development of Regional
Impact (-HOpc.) requesting . further -mment to tM Development
order- fo~ the purpo.e of revi.ing the Ma.ter Sie. Development Plan
to 1noluc:Je 1nduatzoial uae, together with office u.., .. .. permitted
laad UN for Lot. 32, 33, 34A, 348, 35, 36, 37, and 38 within
Quantwa 'ark, and
CODDlGt
IIOrcSa in ".uN ,....lItk type ar. aletion from
exi.ting l.w,
Norcia in nPl"'-r.cQJ'.:l type are additions
Page 2 of ,
of Quantum Park and to retlect the approval ana in~orporation by
reterence of Maater Plan Amendment No. 7 to the Maater Site
Development Plan for Quantum Park elated November 7, 1996, a copy of
which 1. attached aa Exhibit "8-.
Section J.
Upon conaideration of all matters d.escribed in
Section 380 06, Florida Statut.. (1996), it is hereby determined
that:
A. The amendmenta proposed by Oeveloper do not
unreasonably interfere with the achievement oC the objectives
of the adopted atate land development plan applicable to this
.-......
area
B. The amendments propoaed by Developer are eonaiatent
with the local comprehensive plan and local land development
regulationa
C. The amendmenta propoaed by Developer are consistent
with the recoanendationa of the Treasure Coast Regional
PlanDing Couacil on file in the.. p~ceeding..
D. The amendment. propoaed by Developer do not
corwtltute . substantial daviation under Chapter 380 06,
Plorida Statut.. (1"').
~e9tion 4. The City Commda.ion haa concluded a. a matter
of law that the.. pZ'OCeeding. have been duly conductec:l pursuant to
the p:cviaion. of Chapter 380 01, Plorida Statute. (1991), that
Oegeloper i. entitled to the relief prayed and applied tor, and
COCIHG:
IfOrda in ..no ea... type are deletion from
exi.ting law;
Word. in und.~eo%Wd type are additiona.
,.ge 4 of ,
that the Developam1t Order i. hereby amended incorporating the
...ndment. propoaeci by Developer a8 set forth in Section 2 above
Section S.
Except .s otherwise amended herein, tl
Oevelopment Order 8h~ll remain in full torce and .ffect.
Section 6.
All ordinances 01: parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed
Section 7.
Should any .ection or provision of this
ordinance or portion hereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the remainder of this ordinance
Section 8.
Authority ia hereby granted to codify said
ordinance.
Section 9.
Thia ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon pa..age.
....-
j.
~.
nU'l' IUDDG this day of
-
1996
..coD. ~ aDDlIIO AlII) .M~ this _ day of
1996
CIn OJ' JIOYlft'ON BEACH, FI.ORIOA
Mayor
Vice Mayor
CODI_:
WOrd8 in ..IN.. 'h..lI!lL type are deletion from
exiating law J
Wordll in und..rIICO~ type are addition..
Page 5 of 6
Connieetoner
ATTEST
Conni..ioner
City Clerk
Corrni.ai.oner
(CORPORATE SEAL)
IXHIBITS:
RAR - Legal De8cr1pt1an
-S- - -'-nded Maaeer Site Development Plan
Mn'~
n,I'N _
"tlU..-
,aD
"I.OID
CODING:
WoE'da in a'lNell ,"we,,!1a type are deletion from
exiaeing la.,
Worda 1n underscored type are additiorw.
'age , of ,
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO 96-659
Agenda Memorandum for
December 17, 1996 City Commission Meeting
TO Dale Sugerman
City Manager
FROM Tambri J Heyden, AICP'~~
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE December 11, 1996
SUBJECT Quantum Park PID - MPMD 96-007/DRI 96-003
Master Plan Amendment (office/R&D/industrial, lots 32-38 and industrial/
commercial, lots 80-82)
Please place the above-referenced item on the December 17, 1996 City Commission
agenda under Development Plans
DESCRIPTION James G Willard, agent for Quantum Associates, Inc, is requesting
approval to amend the previously approved PID master plan in connection with an
amendment to the DRI to change the use designation of lots 32,33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37
and 38 from Office to OfficellndustriallResearch and Development to allow a proposed
manufacturing use and to change the use designation of lots 80, 81 and 82 from office to
industrial/commercial Quantum Park is located on the west side of the intersection of
Interstate 95 and Gateway Boulevard For further details pertaining to this request, please
see attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No 96-651
RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Development Board, with a 6-0 vote,
recommended approval subject to staff comments in Exhibit "0 " - Conditions of Approval,
with the exception of Comment No 3, which they recommend be deleted Comment No
3 would revert the use designation of lots 32-38 to office if BGI does not receive building
permits by December 31, 1999 Staff is agreeable to this deletion Since the Planning and
Development Board meeting, the applicant has complied with Comment No 2 and
submitted a revised master plan reflecting compliance The revised master plan is
attached to the ordinance prepared in connection with this DRI amendment that is also
scheduled for approval at the December 17, 1996 Commission meeting (ordinance
provided under separate cover)
The remaining staff conditions not addressed are Comments No 1 and 4 which have been
incorporated into the ordinance Comment No 4 pertains to receipt of outstanding
processing fees and Comment No 1 pertains to the master plan issue staff raised at first
reading of the ordinance This note was added by the applicant to relieve his concern
about lack of flexibility of this DRI master plan as compared to other DRI master plans.
The DCA (Department of Community Affairs) and Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council (TCRPC) have discussed with the applicant how to redraw the master plan to have
a trade-off mechanism, which the applicant agreed needed to be done However, the
applicant added note 4 so as not to have to redraw the master plan and to not have to
include DCA and TCRPC in future master plan amendments affecting commercially
designated lots From my communications with TCRPC this week, they have indicated that
they have again discussed this with the applicant and he has agreed to sit down with DCA,
TCRPC and the city to work out the mechanics of how to revamp the master plan
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO 96-666
Agenda Memorandum for
December 17, 1996 City Commission Meeting
TO Dale Sugerman
City Manager
FROM Tambri J Heyden, AICP .~;.i
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE December 11, 1996
SUBJECT Quantum Park DRI - MPMD 96-007/DRI 96-003
(Amend master plan designation of lots 32-38 and 80-82)
Ordinance (2nd reading)
Please place the above-referenced item on the December 17, 1996 City Commission
agenda under Ordinances - Second Reading
DESCRIPTION At the last City Commission meeting the attached ordinance was
approved on first reading The ordinance is in connection with the Quantum Park DRI
master plan amendment affecting the use designation of lots 32-38 and 80-82, that since
the last meeting has been reviewed by staff and the Planning and Development Board
At the last meeting several changes were mentioned by the applicant and staff All of
these changes have been reflected in the attached ordinance, as well as additional
changes that have arisen since the meeting All changes are identified with struck through
or underscored type The more substantive changes include replacement of section 1 to
exclude the incorrect conclusion that the request is classified as an (e)(2) change under
state law In its place a reference has been added that an advertised public hearing is
being held in connection with approval of the request. Outstanding staff comments have
also been inserted, as well as updating Exhibit "B" with the most recently received master
plan revision
RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the attached ordinance be approved on
second and final reading
T JH dim
Attachments
xc Central File
D'\SHARE\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\DRI\CCAGENDA.WPD
Page 2
Memorandum No 96-659
Quantum Park PID
MPMD 96-007/DRI 96-003
Therefore, until that happens, staff is requesting the note be removed Relocation of
commercial lots impacts county and state roads, therefore it is not recommended to
exclude agencies having jurisdiction over these roads from master plan amendments
affecting these roads. (Also the city does not have a traffic engineer on staff )
Lastly, DCA has responded verbally to this application and concurs with the written
response from TCRPC (attached) received since this staff report was prepared As
detailed in the attached staff report, the issue is the difference between the state law
processing requirements contended by the applicant versus DCA and TCRPC Staff
concurs with DCA and TCRPC, due to the lack of evidence submitted with the application,
and the date the application was submitted (less than the 30 days permitted by law
between submittal and approval) However, staff is recommending that this request go
forward for approval, subject to staff comments on December 17th Since TCRPC has
extended themselves, due to the lack of evidence submitted with the application, by
determining that there are no additional regional impacts caused by this request, the only
possible grounds on which the state could appeal this approval is the processing time and
the length of time public notice was provided Although not required by law for the type of
change contended by the applicant, staff exercised caution by planning to execute this
amendment by ordinance which requires an advertised public hearing
TJH dim
Attachments
xc Central File
Oo\SHARE\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\MPMD\CCAGENOA.WPO
EXHIBIT "0"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Qunantum Park
File number' MPMD 96-007/DRIA 96-003
Reference: Master Plan. Amendment NO.7. dated December 4. 1996 (see Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 96-651)
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
PUBLIC WORKS
'N~
UTILITIES
FIRE
POLICE
. NONI=
ENGINEERING DIVISION
. NONI=
BUILDING DIVISION
- . NONI=
PARKS AND RECREATION
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
. NONI=
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments.
1 Note 4 which states, "Lots within the project designated for commercial land
use may be changed/relocated by approval of the City Commission without
further DRI review or amendment" shall be deleted from the master plan.
2, The designation of Lots 80-82 shall be changed from office to industrial!
commercial on the master plan.
3 If BGI has not applied for and received building permits by December 31,
1999, the use designation of lots 32-38 shall revert to office.
4 A check in the amount of $1,698.68 shall be submitted to the city which is the
balance owed for the DCA transmittal of the last land use amendment recently
adopted ( $500), plus $1 198.68 for the last DRI amendment ($47047 for ad
and $1,228.21 for staff review expenses, minus the $500 retainer that was
received with the application).
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
5. Delete Comment NO.3
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
6 To be determined.
T JH.dim
D'\SHARE\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\BGI\DRIA\CONDAPPR. WPD
HANDOUT #2
7.B.l.
USE APPROVAL
7.C.l
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
QUANTUM PARK PID
(0. M<Ut\L.\\
5~\- BJ Stutts & Bowen
.12-10-96 .1e :3AM .
Shutts & BC_\ien~
'0737:6357 :.
ill rn@~nw ~
PlANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
SHUTIS & BOWEN
ATIORNBVS AND COVlIiSEU.ORS AT LAW
110 PAnllllllsHlP ~\lDrNCl PlIO'ISSIONAL ASSOCiATlONSI
1500 MIAMI C5l1'Tl!R
201 SOU'l'li IlISeA YNB BOULlY AIlt)
l\!1AMI, FLOIltl)A 33lS1
M1AMI1305i a"-53~O
IlROWARD (305) 481-834'
rACSIMll.E (305) 38H08z
December 10, 1996
VIA FACSIMcrLE 407/375-6357
MS. Tambr1 Heyden
Planning and Zoning Oirector
City of B.nton Beach
100 East Benton Beach
Benton Beach, Florida
Boulevard
3342.5-0310
Re: Quantum Associatee - NOpe to DR! and PID Use Approval
Oear Tambr1:
Secaus. of my inability to attend tonight '8 Planning and
Development Board Meeting, I would appreciate your distribution of
the enclosed memorandum to the Board members for their
consideration at tonight's meeting
Please call me at your earliest convenience if you would 11ke
to discu.. any of my comments.
JGW/sJftW
Enclosure
ee: Steven E. Flvel, Esquire w/enclosure (Telecopy 317/263-7038)
Susan Dele;al, Esquire w/enclosure (Telecopy 954/463-2030)
0IU832at'.1 IMW
.......-IllD..'" OPPleE
IUIIOP.. IO:JLEV"'''I)''
IW AI) ..ManllO......
THE ~ET>iE'lL.'ItlS
"'1;LBPIlONE Cl'.11 fO-60I'OM'
F,&,,~Sj~r~Cl )'J~Z:)."".14"
lCBV LA"GO OFfICI
OI:."H 1II~ ew.
" oceAN IIEBP OIlIVE
sum 4tOt.
oc=IAN U!P 'l.O~
K1~ LAIlGO. noN))A 1.lC3T
'l1l:.BPHOIn!!!llaIW_1
LONDONOfP1a
. t.lOU~:':' 'nI.'"
l.O"IlON W\~ IIIl: l"G~l>
'l1l~PHON. 011 ~111..n-4840
'ACSIMlLE Cll...t~ "........
OllV.NflO OFFICI
fC NOR':'>! ;)M"IGE AV[NVI
~umn:>oC
OIl~.NI)O. PlOIl'DA ,fie'
TIJ.EPW\)Nllft07J 'U.UOC
....CSIM,:.. '4011 UI.UI.
WII~""U! .."ell OI"f,eE
ONE CUlAIlUK[ Cll''''._'UlT'! ...
too AUSTI'AI.'MIAVl!ron;E 5C1."J);
WIST PAL" .EACH. 'LO'.IDA "+f1
MA.:i.i"lG ^~Pltl~5 r o. .~x...,
WaST '..1."1 q..ell. 'LORIDA "40~.J~"
TlL""ONI1401,..-0
ncsJw.". (ROTlISO.I,UIl
-----.-.-- ---'--1:.
SENT 5Y Shw~ts & B~wen
12- C-95 10 54AM
Sh..:tts 8< 9o~er:~
v3 ~ :
MEMORANDUM
'1'0
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING AKD DEVELOP~NT BOAR[
C/O MS TAMBR! HEYDEN
FROM:
JAMES G. W!LUL~, ATTORNEY FOR QUANTUM ASSOCIATES
SUBJECT
USE APPROVAL AN~ MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
1)ATi: :
December 10, 1996
Due to an unavoidable conf:_ct, I wi:l not be ao.e :0
personally attend to~igh~'s Planning and Developmen: Seard mee:.-q
Therefore, ! would like this .etter ~c be made part of the recc=c
considered by you as you ma~e your recommendations a: tcn_g _'s
rneet_nq
Item 7.B. - U~e ~?r~val
I concur with staff's recornrnendat.on on the Use Approva_
ar.d have ne objections to the Conditions 0= Approva: se~ :~~t~
i:,. Exhibit "C".
Attorney Susan Deleqa.... from the Holland & Kr.iq~: ...a..;
firm, representinq B~I Ind~stries, Inc., will be at tonlg~~'!
meeting on behalf of BGr Please cor.sider any co::r.=.ei:S
desired to be ~ade by Ms Delegal
Par~Qr~h 1.C.l. M8ster P~~n Mod]fica~i~n.
The following corn:nents re_ate to the correspond_nr;_ y
numbe:=ed comments contained in Conditions of Approva. set
forth in Exhibit "D" to the staff report
1. We object to the deletion of note 4 This note ~as
specif~ca~ly negotiated and approved by tte City Co~~issi~r
last July after inp~t by the deve_oper, City staff and V.r
Greg Stuart from D::A In fact, Mr Stuart spec1fica~ly
app=oved the lanquaqe of this note The effort by City staff
to delete note 4 at this time is inapprop=iate and bea~s ~o
connection to the ~and use change 1nvclv1~g the BG!
transaction that is before the Board.
2. Aqreed !tis change has beer. made on the revlsec
Master Site Development Plan dated Decerrber 6, which was
de.~vered yee:erday to City stat!
SEN~ :Y Sh~tts & Bowen
,12- 0-95 10 54AM
SI'iJtts & ~owen"
14073756357,; ,:
3. We request condit_on 3 to be deleted We see ~o
purpose served by this condition If the revised _and use is
appropriate, it sho~ld not ~ake a differen=e when the building
permit is obtained
4 Aqreed
Associates.
These fees will be paid by Quantum
I apologize aqain for ~y inability to appear before yo_ this
even1nq, but I appreciate your coneideration of the foregoing
comments.
JGW/smw
cc Susan Oeleqal, Esquire
Steven E Fivel, Esquire
OIUllU$II.1 . taM'
2
7.C.l
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
QUANTUM PARK PID
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO 96-651
FROM
ChaIrman and Members
Planmng and Development Board
Tambn J Heyden, AICP ~
Planmng and Zomng DIrector
TO
DATE
December 6, 1996
SUBJECT
Quantum Park - MPMD 96-007/DRIA 96-003
Master Plan Amendment (office/R&D/industnal, lots 32 - 38 and Industnal/
commercial, lots 80-82)
NATURE OF REQUEST
Quantum Park of Commerce, a partially built-out Development of RegIOnal Impact (DR!) compnsed
of 5399 acres, zoned PID (Planned Industnal Development), IS located on the west sIde ofI-95,
between Miner Road extended and the Boynton (C-16) Canal (see attached location map - ExhibIt
"A") James G Willard, EsqUIre and agent for Quantum AssocIates, property owner of the Quantum
Park of Commerce, has requested an amendment to the Quantum Park DR! development order,
OrdInance No 84-51 as amended by OrdInance No 86-11,86-37,88-3,94-10,94-51 and 96-33
The proposed amendment IS for the purpose of revlSlng the master plan (master SIte development
plan) to reflect the use of lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 currently deSIgnated for office
use, as office/research and development/industnal use and to reflect the use of lots 80, 81 and 82,
currently deSIgnated for office use, as Industnal/commercIaI use.
BACKGROUND
The amendment request IS governed by SectIOn 7 of AppendIx A, ZonIng, CIty of Boynton Beach
Code of OrdInances, wluch estabhshes Planned Industnal Development DIstncts and by Chapter
380 06 (19), Flonda Statutes, Developments of RegIOnal Impact - Substantial DeViatIOns. ThIS
amendment IS submItted In connectIOn WIth a request from the apphcant that:
1) the CIty make a determInatIOn that the master plan amendment IS not substantial In
nature and
2) the proposed change to the Quantum Park DR! development order
a) IS not a substantial deViatIOn
b) does not reqUIre further Development of RegIOnal Impact reVIew and
c) IS not subject to a pubhc heanng for purposes other than for passage of an
ordInance to amend the ongInal Quantum Park DR! development order
estabhshed by ordInance.
Tills amendment procedure Will reqUIre a one-time change to our development regulatIOns. For non-
development of regIOnal Impact planned Industnal developments, the CIty CommIssIOn must make
a findmg related to the degree of change, that IS, whether or not It IS substantial, and then, the
PlannIng and Development Board approves, approves WIth modIficatIOn, or demes the request. In
thIS Instance, the CIty CommISSIOn must approve any change Therefore, the PlannIng and
Development Board must act In an adVISOry capaCIty to the CIty CommISSIOn, as the State Statutes
prevaIl over CIty ordInances.
/
Page 2
Memorandum No 96-651
Quantum Park - MPMD 96-007/DRIA 96-003
ANAL YSIS
The amended master SIte development plan, (see attached ExhibIt "B") submItted by Quantum
ASSOCIates, wIth the proposed redesIgnatIOn of 23 58 acres of office use as office/research and
development/industnal use, IS compared WIth the mIX m acres ofland use as ongma11y approved and
currently approved as follows
LAND USE ORIGINAL APPROVED PROPOSED INCREASE/
DECREASE
Commercial 276 N/A N/A 0
Office 1289 9862 7504 -24%
Office/Commercial N/A 657 657 0
Office/Hotel/Commercial N/A 13 65 13 65 0
Office/G&I N/A 2.39 2.39 0
Office/Hotel N/A 11 57 11.57 0
Office/R&D N/A 603 603 0
Club N/A 34 34 0
Industnal 2547 115.35 11535 0
w/R&D
Industnal/CommercIaI N/A 2655 26.55 0
Industnal/R&D/Office N/A 23 19 4677 202%
R&D 32 11 32 11 0
Gov't/ N/A 369 369 0
Inst' I
R&D/G&I N/A 24 24 0
Open Space/ 82.2 9667 9667 0
Lakes/ w/
DetentIOn! preserve
Wetlands
Preserve 400 400 0
Roads 466 41 13 41 13 0
TOTALS
5399
553 83
553 83
N/A
J
Page 3
Memorandum No 96-651
Quantum Park - MPMD 96-007/DRIA 96-003
From the table above, the ongmal 1984 DRI contamed 2547 acres of mdustnal/research and
development desIgnated land. There have been SIX amendments to the DRI smce then. The last
amendment allowed a total of 205 63 acres of mdustnal/research and development desIgnated land
(thIS acreage total IS mIsleadmg because the ongmal master plan dId not allow the optIOn of dIfferent
land uses on a gIven parcel as IS the case now, whIch exaggerates the current total) The proposed
amendment (that part affectmg lots 32-38) mcreases the current total to 229.21 acres, WhICh IS an
mcrease of 10% over the prevIOUS amendment, but IS not an mcrease over the ongmal DRI (one of
the state cntenon for determmmg what constItutes a substantial deViatIOn), as the total IS stIll 25 49
acres less than the ongmal DRI.
With respect to the portIon of the subject amendment affectmg lots 80-82, thIS use change was
actually part of the prevIOUS amendment submItted earlIer thIS year ThIS part of that amendment
had to be deleted at the publIc hearmg as It was m connectIOn With a reqUIred land use amendment
applIcatIOn that was submItted concurrently WIth the prevIOUS DRI/master plan amendment, rather
than pnor to the amendment (i.e. - state law reqUIres that the land use amendment must be adopted
pnor to a related DRI amendment) Therefore, It was agreed by the applIcant, the CIty, the
Department of Commumty AffaIrs (DCA) and the Treasure Coast RegIOnal Planmng CouncIl
(TCRPC) that thIS part of the amendment would be resubmItted m the future. Smce thIS aspect of
the applIcatIOn was already reVIewed for local, use 10catIOnal Issues and traffic Issues WIth the
prevIOUS amendment, It IS bemg treated by staff as preVIOusly reVIewed, havmg no addItIOnal
Impacts.
Under Flonda Statutes, Chapter 38006(19) Substantial DeViatIOns, there are five major cntena, (a)-
(e), that are used to determme whether a proposed amendment constItutes a substantIal deVIatIOn,
whether a publIc hearmg IS reqUIred, whether an amended development order IS necessary and
determme the mmImum tIme frame, as well as, the maXImum tIme frame wIthm whIch an
amendment can be approved by a local government. The applIcant states that thIS change falls under
(e )(2) of the above-referenced sectIOn and chapter of Flonda Statutes, whIch would not reqUIre a
publIc hearmg and places no lImItatIOn on the mmImum tIme frame wIthm whIch thIS amendment
could be approved. However, m order to fall under an (e )(2) type change, the change must be less
than 40% (eIther cumulatIvely or mdIvIdually) of 32 acres (the threshold for mdustnal use for thIS
project gIven ItS SIze) The change proposed IS 23 58 acres or 79% and therefore IS conSIdered to
be an (e)(3) type change (a change not speCIfically claSSIfied elsewhere under state law) An (e)(3)
change requues a publIc heanng and cannot be approved m less than 45 days. The applIcant has
requested a December 17, 1996 CIty CommISSIOn approval date whIch, based on the date the
applIcatIOn was submItted, IS less than the 45 days allowed. State law does mdIcate that an (e )(3)
change may be rebutted by "clear and convmcmg eVIdence"
BGI IS a PeruVIan manufacturmg company that the CIty has been negotIatmg WIth for approXImately
seven months to select Boynton Beach as theIr base of operatIOn over other competmg CItIes m three
Flonda countles. When the Boynton Beach declSlon was made, the applIcant requested the CIty'S
help m expedItmg thIS applIcatIOn (necessary to BGI as a contmgency to theu end of year land
purchase) The TCRPC has verbally responded to thIS amendment (tlme dId not permIt wntten
comments to be mcluded m thIS report) and has determmed that tills amendment IS an (e)(3) change
Furthermore, they have a concern With a note (#4) on the master plan that would preclude theIr and
the state's reVIew of further amendments mvolvmg commerCIally deSIgnated lots.
With any redIstributIOn or redesIgnatIOn of land use WIthm a master plan, the follOWing local Issues
are evaluated.
1 Does the redIstributIOn/redesIgnatIOn of land use result m a change m concept for the
Quantum Park of Commerce or the abIlIty of the Park to develop m a qualIty
manner?
,3
Page 4
Memorandum No 96-651
Quantum Park - MPMD 96-007/DRIA 96-003
2 What Impact wIll the land use redlstributIOn/redeslgnatIOn have on projected
expendItures whIch wIll be spent wlthm the regIOn?
3 Does the Impact of the land use redlstributIOn/redeslgnatIOn result m a conflIct WIth
the number, type and payroll level of Jobs projected m Quantum Park's ApplIcatIOn
for Development Approval (ADA)?
4 What Impact wIll the land use redlstributIOn/redeslgnatIOn have on adjacent
property?
5 Will there be an mcrease m traffic resultmg from the land use
redlstributIOn/redeslgnatlon?
The trend of mIxed land uses, as proposed, IS supported by the mtent stated m the Planned Industnal
Development Dlstnct RegulatIOns whIch reads as follows.
"The purpose of thIS dlstnct IS to proVIde a zomng claSSIficatIOn for lIght mdustnal
development that wIll better satIsfy current demands for lIght mdustnal zoned lands by
encouragmg development WhICh WIll reflect changes m the technology of land development
and relate the development of land to the specIfic SIte and to conserve natural amemtIes."
Furthermore, as shown on the attached ExhibIt C - ongmal DRI master plan, more than 50% of the
lots wlthm Quantum Park WhICh are affected by the proposed redeslgnatIon of land use were
ongmally slated for mdustrlal use. Also, as prevIOusly mentIOned, although the ongmal master plan
reflected more mdustnal/research and development mdustna1 acreage than the current total. The
proposed acreage total IS a 10% mcrease over the current total. Therefore, the proposed change IS
m keepmg WIth the ongmal Quantum Park concept as a planned mdustnal park.
With regard to the Impact of the proposed change on projected expendItures wlthm the regIOn and
proJected Jobs, lots 32 - 38 are planned to be developed by Beauty Group InternatIOnal Industnes,
Inc (BGI) for cosmetIc, perfume and Jewelry manufacturmg. The company expects mltIally to
employ 250-300 persons, of whIch 40-50 WIll be managenal or technIcally tramed personnel. The
remammg employees wIll be unskIlled productIOn workers Eventually, the company plans to
operate two 8-hour slufts and employ 400 persons. The maJonty of the managenal and technIcally
tramed personnel, and the entIre unskIlled labor force, wIll be hIred from the local populatIOn. In
addItIon, BGI expects to purchase a sIgmficant portIOn of ItS raw matenal needs from local supplIers
and hopes to develop strong tIes to the local economy
As to the Impact of the proposed research and development mdustnal change on adjacent propertIes,
there IS reSIdentially-zoned property mllnedIately to the east. Tlus property IS vacant and although
zoned reSIdentIal, the CIty'S comprehenSIVe plan recommends that the property be developed as a
planned mdustnal development. A penmeter buffer of 25 feet m WIdth between the two propertIes
was approved as part of a recent PID greenbeltlslgnage plan.
Lastly, relatIve to traffic, offices uses generate more tnps per day than mdustnal uses. A traffic
study submItted mdIcates that thIS use amendment represents a 53% reductIOn m PM peak hour trIpS
projected from the prevIOUS office use deSIgnatIOn. Consequently, no addItIOnal traffic can be
expected beyond that whIch has already been prOjected for the Quantum Park DRI
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend's the followmg
if
Page 5
Memorandum No 96-651
Quantum Park - MPMD 96-007/DRIA 96-003
1) that the CIty hold a CIty CommISSIOn publIc hearmg on December 17th, 1996
(meetmg the standard 10 day notIce for ordmances to adopt a revIsed development
order, rather than the 15 days for an (e)(3) change),
2) that the Planrung and Development Board and CIty ComnllSSIOn make the followmg
findmgs
a) that tills applIcatIOn IS not a substantIal change by local codes WIth respect to
the reVlSlons proposed and
b) that thIS applIcatIOn does not constItute a substantIal deVIatIOn under state law
3) that thIS applIcatIOn be approved subject to the condItIOns m ExhibIt D (Removal of
master plan note #4 IS mcluded as a condItIOn to brIdge the gap between TCRPC's
pOSItIon that tills amendment IS a (e)(3) change and staffs deSIre to process thIS as an
(e)(2) change. Furthermore, It IS not m the CIty'S best mterest to preclude DCA's or
TCRPC's abIlIty to comment on a proposed amendment, espeCIally when state and
county roads are Impacted by the DRI
TJH.dIm
Attachments
xc ApplIcant
Central FIle
D-\SHARE\ WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\MPMD\ST AFFREP WPD
5'
E X H I BIT "A"
&
EXHIBIT "B"
g
r-
~
;,
?
-:J
.
~
------
- ---~-
_!J """"':
!
-::J:-:J
~
il
'-"!--,
)' t
,
l
NOTES
n
-=---~=---=-:---
-::
J
iI';;
I h'!1 ~
:;!I;;
"!j:,
i;!/il
II;!'
"
--
_ow
..
...
/
I
i
i
!
I~
r --
-, -:Jl 1
.J -=-:J
"
,1i'1
1'1
1
,,:ii'
~ : ~ ; i i
il'r:
,!: ! : ; ~
: !oi'
jl!~ ","i'
~, ~i' I':;
.wn
rei "i
; ~~"I"
,I"i,
:,'1'
-
.. .
J-~
..
~
..
"""
~
CATt.AT BLVD.
:r'
, 51
~--~'-:iF==
-=~f -l~-
~
.. ..
~__ om:v=:---
...
"='
-
-:":'"
..
"""
-
...-....:::;'"
,/://
j :",
/' I
..
..
t!
j
&
..
--
-
--
-.
--
'.J
~l
LW.O.D. [QUAUZING CANAl C-16
-=
=
MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 7
NOVEMBER 7 1996
THIS PQlII'1.or. or F.ut. ROi:;!'; Ilk VC I.:> 8f v.......ru, , HE
1.... OT lWf. I1IGH SCHOClI. O('.'(LoPtCNT ... ACCORClNtCr WITI'I
OIl. AWtNOtll(NT ",. . DA.T[rJ 4/19/9.
2 O(V[LO....O\l1 OF Ti'€ fOUOlrINC L..UIO US[ CLASStrIC..llOJrfS SHOlA.L [x:[([:
f'0L&.0WINC INIEHSmES WITHOUT fURTHER CfT"I APHOwL
~ (lfitCl~ .. . 0' 2.7I4.l!l4 SO " GROSS nOOlt .,pE"
C<-tJIC~ (INCLlJOl..c. ..om ,CLUB) 426.888 so n Gfl':':;'~ lU-':.A.8.E
'tOT TCt excEEO 47 TOTAL ACRES
orf'!C.[ 1."5.1'12 so " CflQSS F\J)Clft 01,/1:[,1.
ON( HOTEl ROOW 2A so n CROSS ~[ Mu. COUYER(,A...
J TOlAL W:STEt' TIIlP5 fOR THE PROJEct $IoW.J.. RI........ 6].7~2 AD'
lOTS .... THE PffOJ[CT OCsrcuTtD n:lR COMW[RCIAL LAND USE ...~ 6[
CIoUoNG{fl/RElOCATtr> BY APQt:'::Ml.l or THE em COWJ,tl'iSlClfo 1lIm<()UT rURII1[r' DR- "[\"101
_....NT
MASTER
SITE
DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
LEGEND
~...-lJ--1 ':'
i
(III rur)
KEY PLAN
Office
Office/Commercial
Office/Hotel/Commercial
Office/Hotel
Office/Industrial
Office/R4cD
Office/Gael
Industnol/Commerclol
Industriol/R&D/Office
Industrial
R&D
R&D/G&I
Governmental/In stitutiono!
Wetlands
Sand Pine Reserve
Roads
.......
--
{:}
OP~~rkS:ACE ----i
5~~:~tlon ===1
75.04 Acres
6.57 Acres
13.65 Acres
11.57 Acres
23.58 Acres
6.03 Acres
2.39 Acres
26.55 Acres
2319 Acres
115.35 Acres
32.11 Acres
2.40 Acres
36.90 Acres
6 00 Acres
40.00 Acres
41 13 Acres
QUANTUM ASSOCIATES
National City Center
115 West Washington St
Indianapolis IN 46204
(317) 636-1600
90_67 Acres
1~9ii
TOTAL
5~3. 3
"...9
QUANTUM PARK
~ -...
E X H I BIT "e"
/0
0i
BEACH
'--'
.....
"'~a"'a..a LANa u..
eYM.OL. u.. "c... ...
C CDMM..a'AL. ..,.. ...
a a.....c. 1.... ....
I L'.NT INDU......."'" ......,. 4117..
L/W LAIiC.. a w.TL. ANIt .... 1...
" _DAD. .... ...
..... . .a..
N
~
,
,
The I
: I High Ridge
II Cammerce,
~ ~- ~:~
~
.... ...' ......
..17".4
MI.....
.
.
.
I
--------&-
---------r
.
4'.-
Tit. D..
L.. ..~ ItUD
.
.;
I
--=='"F~
I
I
I
I
I
The
Mat:arale
~Iant:
SIt:e
.
<
.
u
....
L.a.Na
D LAND U..
8.. AC"..
"
2
o
~
:>
II
W
11 II
H W
Ii I
lH 2
~51f ~
#~
2
W
:!
Do
o
.I
W
>
W
o
THE
...... ::e~:.'i~y
BOYNTON
,
I
l.
r.
I
I
l!J
~
Do
~
U
II
o
2
~
.I
II
DF CDMMERCE ~
~
By Rlt:eco Development: Carp.:!
MA~ H-1
PARK
Cf?-LG I NAL-
tv1.t'rST€-t-2... ~
1/
EXHIBIT "D"
l:f
'-
EXHIBIT "0"
Conditions of Approval
Project name. Qunantum Park
File number' MPMD 96-007/DRIA 96-003
Reference. Master Plan. Amendment NO.7. dated December 4. 1996 (see Plannina and Zoning Deoartment
Memorandum No. 96-651)
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
- N()N~
UTILITIES
N()N~
FIRE
. NONF
POLICE
NONF
ENGINEERING DIVISION
NONF
BUILDING DIVISION
- . N()N~
PARKS AND RECREATION
NONF
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
l NONF
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments.
1 Note 4, which states, 'Lots within the project designated for commercial land
use may be changed/relocated by approval of the City Commission without
further DRI review or amendment" shall be deleted from the master plan
2, The designation of Lots 80-82 shall be changed from office to industrial/
commercial on the master plan
3 If BGI has not applied for and received building permits by December 31
1999 the use designation of lots 32-38 shall revert to office.
4 A check in the amount of $1 69868 shall be submitted to the city which is the
balance owed for the DCA transmittal of the last land use amendment recently
adopted ($500) plus $1 19868 for the last DRI amendment ($47047 for ad
and $1,228.21 for staff review expenses, minus the $500 retainer that was
received with the application)
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
5 To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
6 To be determined
T JH dim
D'\SHARE\WP\PROJ ECTS\QUANTUM\BGI\DRIA\CONDAPPR.WPD
/3
~/
.O_'{!Ji'O. ,
V/. ~.
I. / .,A.,
....., .:v
01 '
~i~ .,)"l:
/....~ I ."
V" :y..
~ .'
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
~oC ~~p:!ID,
I
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FO
!~q!G !
C1 Preliminary Draft
o Revised Draft
rn Final Submittal
o January 7 1997
Date Final Form MU!ll be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Mu. be Turned
into City Manager's Office Meeting Datell into City Manager's Office
November 25, 1996 o February 4, 1997 January 29 1997
December II, 1996 o February 18. 1997 February 12. 1997
December 30. 1996 o March 4, 1997 February 29 1997
January IS 1997 o Man:b 18. 1997 March 12. 1997
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
I!I December' 19%
o December 17 1996
o January 21 1997
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
a Adrmnistrative
a Bid
fD Legal
a Consent
a PublIc Heanng
a Unfmlshed
Busmess
a Presentation
a New BUSIness
0- Other
DESCRIPTION OF
AG END A ITEM (attach additional sheets and 511pporting documeatatiOD if necessary) PUBLIC HEARING-Cons ide rat ion 0 f
making a determination that the proposed changes to the Quantum Park D.R I
(revising the Master Site Development Plan to include industrial use, together
with office use, as a permitted land use for Lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36. 37
and 38) do not constitute a substantial deviation as those changes are related to the
present submittal on behalf of Beauty Group International (BGI)
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of the ordinance on first reading after the conclusion of the Pub1ic
Hearing
All staff comments and concerns on this matter will be submitted to
the City Commission prior to the second reading and public hearing scheduled for
the December 17. 1996 City Commission meetin2.
Department Head's Signature
/0 ^ C' ~
\ )nlc ~ j' L......l...L~'-
---- City Manager's Signa~
II -
._~.... ..",... ,..........
,.r n ?l I I r~l
'"
'-'
OJtD!IGIIC. NO 0'6-
AB omt1fAHCll 01' TIQI CIn eoJDaSIIOII 01' TRB
CITY or IOYlftOII BDar, n.oamA. PJtOVIDIITG POR
A OJITmualfA'l'IOlf 'I'D'!' CDHG.. TO '1'111
COIIP....8IW Dnm.oPIUDIT or RBGIOHAL IMPACT
APPaoYm) m ORDDI>>ICa 110. 8"- 51. AIm AllDDm
I. ORD~ NOS. .'-11, "-3', 88-3. 't-l0,
'4-51 AJQ) "-33, J)() NOT COB8'U'l'U'l'B A
SUBI'l'AII'l'IAL DBVIA'I'IOlf mma CHAPTD 380 .06,
",oaD>A STA'rU'RS, 1'" . DBTmaaNDtG TDT 1110
J'tlA"&.... Dnm.oPllD'l' 01' UGIOlIAL IMPACT IlBVIn
IS ..aS8M'!' UGAJa)DfQ SUCH CHANCDS. upaOVI.g
SUCH CJIUO.8, AIIIND%1tt1 '1"HJI D&'ftLOPlClln' OItJ)D
(OaDIMANCB ROS. 8t-51, 86-11, 81-37;-88-3, '4-
10, '.-51 >>1D "-33) 1'OJt PUUOSIS OJ'
IlfCOJtPOItA'I'%MG 'rRII APPaovBJ) ClfAHCD8, pROV%DIn
roa COID'LIC'l'S. anuuILITY. CODIt'ICATIOH AIm
AM ....crzw DAD.
WP'IItSAI, Riteco Development Corporation, a Florida corporation
(llRiteco.) filed with the City of Boynton Beach (the "City") an
Application for Development Approval of Comprehensive Development
of Regional Impact (the "ADA") on May 21, 1984, regarding that
certain property (the .Propertytl) dellcribed in Exhibit wAil,
attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
....~, the ADA wa. approved and the Development Order for
the Property was granted December 18, 1984 and pursuant to
Ordinance No. 8.-51 (the -Development Order-); and
CODING:
Words in .'~.k .R.e'li!ft type are deletion from
exiat1ng law;
Worda in under8cor~d type are addition.
Page 1 of 6
~, Riteco subaequently conveyed its right, titles and
interest in and to the Property to Boynton Park ot Commerce, Inc .
a Florida corporation ("Boynton Park"), and, Boynton Park, in turn,
subsequently conveyed its right, title and interest in and to the
Property to Quantum A8sociat.., a Florida general partnership (the
-Developer"); and
WRaRaA8, Developer tiled with the City respective application
to amend the Development Order, which applications were approved by
the City in Ordinance No 86-11, Ordinance No 86-37, Ordinance No
88-3, Ordinance No 94-10, and Ordinance No 94~51; and
WHDDS, the term "Development Order" incTudell all amendments
thereto; and
WHDDS, Quantum Associates, a Florida general partnership
(-Developer") is the current owner and developer of the remaining
vacant land within the project conmonly known a. Quantum Corporate
Park at Boynton Beach DeveloptAent of Regional Impact (sometimes
hereinafter called the "QuantUM Park ORI"); and
1fII'DDI, Developer haa submitted to the City a Notification of
roposed Change to a previou8ly Approved Development of Regional
Impact ("NOpc.) requesting a further amendment to the Development
Order for the purpo8e of ravi8ing the Master Site Development Plan
,A-- R. 4.
to include induatrial use, together with office use, as a permitted
land use for Lots 32, 33,~~~~~, 35, 3~, 31, and 38 within
Quantum Park; and -/-b ~ ~ fp. 1"1 ~ I" ~
~: ~-u,-<z.~_/ -/'t;~~l ~~ p/lA'--t& 4 C ~/
l/[J CO~HG: Words in MNSk .Il..li!lt tYPe -are -CjeletTOn-lrom
existing law;
Words in under.cored type are additions
Page 2 of 6
-r~
.,.
."
~KA8, the City Commission of Boynton Beach, as the
governing body having jurisdiction, i8 authorized and empowered to
consider applications for amendments to development orders
approving developments of regional impact pursuant to Chapter
380 06, Florida Statutes (1996); and
WHJaKAS, said City Commission has considered the testimony,
reports and other documentary evidence submitted at said public
hearing by Developer, the City staff and the public, and the City
Planning and Zoning Board'.. recormendation of the _ day of
, 1996; and
WBDDS, said City Commission haa con....idered all of the
foregoing
lION, TURUOU, .. IT ORDAIIIIID BY '1'HI CITY C0JGa8BIOlf OF TIm
CITY O. BOnft'OR ...es, FLORIDA, 'l'JIAT.
Section 1.
Developer haa established that the proposed
change individually or cumulatively with any previous Changes to
the Development Order is less than forty (40') percent of any
numerical criterion contained in Florida Statute Section
380.06(19) (b) 1 -15. and does not exceed any other criterion, and
is not subject to the public hearing requirements of Chapter 3BO, I
Florida Statutes
Section 2. Developer has requ..ted that the Development
order be amended to reflect that both Indu8trialf~~ Office land
uses shall be permitted on Lote 32, 33, 34A, 348, 35, 36, 37 and 38
(}-,,~ ~ I!t- ~ tf ./dv Ot; f'/ ~~ t?~~
CODING: words in e.Nek &He. type are deletion from
existing law;
Words in unde~lIcq.ed type are additions
Page 3 of 6
k-- ~h~//
:~ ~ t~~
11) (jJ>>vr>u/v~~
of Quantum Park and to reflect the approval and incorporation by
reference of Master Plan Amendment No 7 to the Master Site
Development Plan for Quantum Park dated November 7, 1996, a copy of
which i8 attached a ibit "B". ,~. :;-fn~n -.'
:J~_jk~~~111q(:,
Section 3. Upon con.ideration of all matters described in
Section 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996), it is hereby determined dee
that:
A The amendments proposed by Developer do not
unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives
of the adopted state land development plan applicable to this
area
B. The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent
with the local comprehensive plan and local land development
regulations
C The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent
with the recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council on file in these proceedings
D. The amendments proposed by Developer do not
constitute a substantial deviation under Chapter 380 O~,
Florida Statutes (1996)
Se;tioQ i.
The City Commdssion has concluded as a matter
of law that the.. proceeding. have been duly eonducted pursuant to
the provisions of Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996), that
Developer is entitled to the relief prayed and applied for, and
COOING
Words in .'Nell ea~e~gk type are deletion from
existing law;
Word. in underseored type are addition.
Page 4 of 6
--
~
that the Development Order is hereby amended incorporating the
amendment8 proposed by Developer as set forth in Section 2 above
Section 5
Except as otherwise amended herein, the
Development Order ehall remain in full force and effect
Section 6.
All ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed
Section 7.
Should any eection or provision of this
ordinance or portion hereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be
declared by a court of competent juriediction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the remainder of this ordin~ce
Section 8.
Authority i. hereby granted to codify said
ordinance
Secti.on 9.
This
ordinance
shall
become
effective
immediately upon passage
PXRST ~Z8Q this ____ day of
1996
a.CORD. .%ML lmADDftJ AIm PASSACD this _ day of
1996
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Mayer
Vice Mayor
CODING:
words in MIN.-A 'h".lI!1l type are deletion from
exi.ting law;
Words in unde~,cored type are addition.
Page 5 of 6
Commissioner
ATTEST
Cotmlisllioner
City Clerk
Cotmliaaioner
(CORPORATE SEAL)
EXHIBITS:
RAR - Legal Description
"8" - Amended Master Site Development Plan
""./1.
n/"N
nona _
\OID
!lit I OlD
CODING
Worde in s'Nell t!klP's\I!ft type are deletion from
exiating law;
Words in underscored type are additions
Page 6 of 6
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO 96-672
FROM
Dale Sugerman
City Manager 0 I , tuv
:v, 1A;.o ~ltl\...
Tambri J Heyden, AICP ,~t J: J 'ft
Planning and Zoning Directqr V'
TO
DATE
August 19, 1996
SUBJECT
Copies of Development Plans of Current Projects
Scheduled for Review by the City Commission at the
December 11, 1995 City Commission Meeting
Please find attached five (5) sets of plans for the following current development projects
Master Plan Modification -
Quantum Park PID
DRI 96-003
Orchard Landing
Subdivision Master Plan
SBMP 96-002
Hills at Lake Eden
New Site Plan
NWSP 96-011
Note Please return the plans/documents to the Planning and Zoning Department
following the meeting
If I can be of further assistance, please contact me
T JH bme
Attachments
cc. Central File
Subject File
d:\share\agendas\citycomm\transdec. wpd
NOTICE
I
I
, I
i
Ii
8}j
I'
i
The following proposed ordinances which are published by caption
at the Regular City Commission meeting of the City Commissio EPI
Boynton Beach, Florida, on the 3rd day of December, 1996 These ordinances
shall be presented for proposed enactment by the City Commission at the Regular
City Commission meeting at City Hall, in the Commission Chambers, 100 East
Boynton Beach Blvd, Boynton Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, December 17th, 1996
at 7 '00 P M
ORDINANCE #096-64
.....
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, REGARDING THE REZONING OF
BOYNTON COMMONS-.PCQ-J AMENDING ORDINANCE 91-70 OF SAID
CITY BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 2
SECTION 6 F 13 OF THE CITY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS,
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
. "t,-
\Y"
~. . '\ \['- , .}.-t
\\)/ u-
f ;;~-
\Q/
{Q; ~;p5
ORDINANCE #096-65
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A DETERMINATION
THAT CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF ,>X ~
REGIONAL IMPACT APPROVED IN ORDINANCE NO 84-51, AND yvf't"';
AMENDED IN ORDINANCE NOS 86-11,86-37,88-3,94-10,94-51 AND 96- {iYr &'
33, DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION UNDER ()",) \r
CHAPTER 38006, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1996, DETERMINING THAT NO b\\Y \)Q;
FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW IS
NECESSARY REGARDING SUCH CHANGES, APPROVING SUCH
CHANGES, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ORDINANCE
NOS 84-51,86-11,86-37,88-3,94-10,94-51 AND 96-33) FOR PURPOSES
OF INCORPORATING THE APPROVED CHANGES, PROVIDING FOR
CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE
DATE
Interested parties may appear at said meeting and be heard with respect to
these proposed ordinances Subject ordinances may be inspected by the public
at the Office of the City Clerk at said City Hall Pursuant to F S 286 0105,
please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the
City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, he will
need a record of this proceeding, and for such purpose, he may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the
testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
SUZANNE M KRUSE,CMC/AAE
CITY CLERK
PUBLISH PALM BEACH POST
FRIDAY, DECEMBER 6,1996
c City Mgr, City Attny, City Commission, Planning, Files
MAS\
S'\CC\WP\ORDAD3. WPD