Loading...
AGENDA DOCUMENTS ... CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM D Prelimmary Draft D RevIsed Draft ~ Requested City Commission Meeting Dates D December 3,1996 o December 17 1996 D January 7 1997 D January 21, 1997 Date Final Form Must be Turned into City Manager's Office November 25,1996 Requested City Commission Meeting Dates D February 4, 1997 D February 18, 1997 D March 4 1997 D March 18, 1997 December 11, 1996 December 30, 1996 January IS, 1997 NATURE OF AGENDA ITEM D AdnunlstratIon D Consent D BId D PublIc Heanng Dl Legal D Unfimshed Busmess ORDINANCE 2ND READING DESCRIPTION OF AGENDA ITEM (attach additional sheets and supporting documentation if necessary) y LEGAL A.3 cc Dev, Plan Final SubmIttal Date Final Form Must be Turned into City Manager's January 29 1997 February 12, 1997 February 29 1997 March [2, 1997 D PresentatIon D New Business D Other Ordinance to amend the Quantum Park DR! (Development of Regional Impact) development order to change the master plan use designation of lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 from Office to OfficelIndustrial/Research and Development and the designation of lots 80, 81 and 8 ffice to Industrial/Commercial (see attached Planning and Zoning Deparbnent Memorandum N . ~-651). RECOMMENDATION . pproved on second reading and final reading. Changes to the J~' ~~~ Department Heatts Signature \ c,~ l\,; City Manager's i ature L -""L (t D.\SHARE\ WP\FORMS\AGENDAS\CITYCOM\AGENDANW WPD ~./ ~ '( N 1"() 1-- 4 ., o - 'en y\ I. .~'J: '(''' ';', ',.. /,,). . I./y.. J CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH X I LEGAL A3 cc Dav, Plan AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM (j Preliminary Draft o Revised Draft UJ Final Submittal Requnted City Commillioa MeeliDI 0IteI ~ December 1 1996 o.a. Fiul Form Mu. be Turned into City Mill..... Off"lCe Requated City Coaunillioe Meelin, 0.... 0.. FinaJ Form MUll be Turned illlo City Maaapr's Of'flce January 29. 1997 n a December 17 1996 a JlIluary 7 1991 a January 21. 1991 2ND READING 197 1 FebnJary 12. 1997 February 29. 1997 Man:h 12. 1997 )1 NATURE OF AGENDA ITEM a Administrative a Bid ID Legal a Consent a Public Hearing a Unfinished Business a Presentation a New BuslDcss Q- Other DESCRIPTION OF AGENDA ITEM (lIfKluddiCio_......_..lppOItiD.docv.-..,;~if....,.' PUBLIC BEA1lING-Consideration of making a determination that the proposed changes to the Quantum Park D.K.I. (revising the Master Site Development Plan to include industrial use, together with office use, as a permitted land use for Lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38) do not constitute a substantial deviation a. those changes are related to c present submittal on behalf of Beauty Group International (BGI). RECOMMENDATION Approval of the ordinance on first reading after the conclusion of the Public - Hearing. All staff co...nts and concern. on this matter will be submitted to the City Co.ai..1on prior to the second reading and public hearing scheduled for the Dec.-ber 17. 1996 City Commission .eetinK. Oeputmcat II..'. Si....... / J)(l~ S ~H+'LL_~ City Mlupr'1 Si ......., Riteco sub8equently convwyed ita right, titles and intereat in and to the property to Boynton Park of Commerce, Inc , a Florida corporation ("Soynton Park-), and, Boynton Park, in turn, subsequently conveyed its right, title and intereat in and to the Property to Quantum ~.oci.tes, a Florid. general partnership (the "Developer"); and wa.RaA8, Developer tiled with the City ~e.pective application to amencl the Development Order, which application. were approved by the City in Ordinance No. 86-11, Ord.1nance No 86-37, Ordinance No 88.3, O~dinance No 94-10, and Ordinance No. 94-511 and ..,;.......- ......, the term .Development Order" includes all amendments thereto I and Quantum A..ociat.., . Plorida general partnership ("Developer") i. the current owner and developer ot the remaining vacant land within the project c0IIIn0I11y known .. Quantum Corporate park at Boynton Beach Development of R~ional Impact (sometimes hereinafter called the "Quantwa Park DRI -); and ....., Developer ba. .ubn1ttecl to the City a Notifieation of Proposed Change to . pr.viou.ly Approved Development of Regional Impact (-HOpc.) requesting . further -mment to tM Development order- fo~ the purpo.e of revi.ing the Ma.ter Sie. Development Plan to 1noluc:Je 1nduatzoial uae, together with office u.., .. .. permitted laad UN for Lot. 32, 33, 34A, 348, 35, 36, 37, and 38 within Quantwa 'ark, and CODDlGt IIOrcSa in ".uN ,....lItk type ar. aletion from exi.ting l.w, Norcia in nPl"'-r.cQJ'.:l type are additions Page 2 of , of Quantum Park and to retlect the approval ana in~orporation by reterence of Maater Plan Amendment No. 7 to the Maater Site Development Plan for Quantum Park elated November 7, 1996, a copy of which 1. attached aa Exhibit "8-. Section J. Upon conaideration of all matters d.escribed in Section 380 06, Florida Statut.. (1996), it is hereby determined that: A. The amendmenta proposed by Oeveloper do not unreasonably interfere with the achievement oC the objectives of the adopted atate land development plan applicable to this .-...... area B. The amendments propoaed by Developer are eonaiatent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulationa C. The amendmenta propoaed by Developer are consistent with the recoanendationa of the Treasure Coast Regional PlanDing Couacil on file in the.. p~ceeding.. D. The amendment. propoaed by Developer do not corwtltute . substantial daviation under Chapter 380 06, Plorida Statut.. (1"'). ~e9tion 4. The City Commda.ion haa concluded a. a matter of law that the.. pZ'OCeeding. have been duly conductec:l pursuant to the p:cviaion. of Chapter 380 01, Plorida Statute. (1991), that Oegeloper i. entitled to the relief prayed and applied tor, and COCIHG: IfOrda in ..no ea... type are deletion from exi.ting law; Word. in und.~eo%Wd type are additiona. ,.ge 4 of , that the Developam1t Order i. hereby amended incorporating the ...ndment. propoaeci by Developer a8 set forth in Section 2 above Section S. Except .s otherwise amended herein, tl Oevelopment Order 8h~ll remain in full torce and .ffect. Section 6. All ordinances 01: parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed Section 7. Should any .ection or provision of this ordinance or portion hereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this ordinance Section 8. Authority ia hereby granted to codify said ordinance. Section 9. Thia ordinance shall become effective immediately upon pa..age. ....- j. ~. nU'l' IUDDG this day of - 1996 ..coD. ~ aDDlIIO AlII) .M~ this _ day of 1996 CIn OJ' JIOYlft'ON BEACH, FI.ORIOA Mayor Vice Mayor CODI_: WOrd8 in ..IN.. 'h..lI!lL type are deletion from exiating law J Wordll in und..rIICO~ type are addition.. Page 5 of 6 Connieetoner ATTEST Conni..ioner City Clerk Corrni.ai.oner (CORPORATE SEAL) IXHIBITS: RAR - Legal De8cr1pt1an -S- - -'-nded Maaeer Site Development Plan Mn'~ n,I'N _ "tlU..- ,aD "I.OID CODING: WoE'da in a'lNell ,"we,,!1a type are deletion from exiaeing la., Worda 1n underscored type are additiorw. 'age , of , PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 96-659 Agenda Memorandum for December 17, 1996 City Commission Meeting TO Dale Sugerman City Manager FROM Tambri J Heyden, AICP'~~ Planning and Zoning Director DATE December 11, 1996 SUBJECT Quantum Park PID - MPMD 96-007/DRI 96-003 Master Plan Amendment (office/R&D/industrial, lots 32-38 and industrial/ commercial, lots 80-82) Please place the above-referenced item on the December 17, 1996 City Commission agenda under Development Plans DESCRIPTION James G Willard, agent for Quantum Associates, Inc, is requesting approval to amend the previously approved PID master plan in connection with an amendment to the DRI to change the use designation of lots 32,33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 from Office to OfficellndustriallResearch and Development to allow a proposed manufacturing use and to change the use designation of lots 80, 81 and 82 from office to industrial/commercial Quantum Park is located on the west side of the intersection of Interstate 95 and Gateway Boulevard For further details pertaining to this request, please see attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No 96-651 RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Development Board, with a 6-0 vote, recommended approval subject to staff comments in Exhibit "0 " - Conditions of Approval, with the exception of Comment No 3, which they recommend be deleted Comment No 3 would revert the use designation of lots 32-38 to office if BGI does not receive building permits by December 31, 1999 Staff is agreeable to this deletion Since the Planning and Development Board meeting, the applicant has complied with Comment No 2 and submitted a revised master plan reflecting compliance The revised master plan is attached to the ordinance prepared in connection with this DRI amendment that is also scheduled for approval at the December 17, 1996 Commission meeting (ordinance provided under separate cover) The remaining staff conditions not addressed are Comments No 1 and 4 which have been incorporated into the ordinance Comment No 4 pertains to receipt of outstanding processing fees and Comment No 1 pertains to the master plan issue staff raised at first reading of the ordinance This note was added by the applicant to relieve his concern about lack of flexibility of this DRI master plan as compared to other DRI master plans. The DCA (Department of Community Affairs) and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) have discussed with the applicant how to redraw the master plan to have a trade-off mechanism, which the applicant agreed needed to be done However, the applicant added note 4 so as not to have to redraw the master plan and to not have to include DCA and TCRPC in future master plan amendments affecting commercially designated lots From my communications with TCRPC this week, they have indicated that they have again discussed this with the applicant and he has agreed to sit down with DCA, TCRPC and the city to work out the mechanics of how to revamp the master plan PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 96-666 Agenda Memorandum for December 17, 1996 City Commission Meeting TO Dale Sugerman City Manager FROM Tambri J Heyden, AICP .~;.i Planning and Zoning Director DATE December 11, 1996 SUBJECT Quantum Park DRI - MPMD 96-007/DRI 96-003 (Amend master plan designation of lots 32-38 and 80-82) Ordinance (2nd reading) Please place the above-referenced item on the December 17, 1996 City Commission agenda under Ordinances - Second Reading DESCRIPTION At the last City Commission meeting the attached ordinance was approved on first reading The ordinance is in connection with the Quantum Park DRI master plan amendment affecting the use designation of lots 32-38 and 80-82, that since the last meeting has been reviewed by staff and the Planning and Development Board At the last meeting several changes were mentioned by the applicant and staff All of these changes have been reflected in the attached ordinance, as well as additional changes that have arisen since the meeting All changes are identified with struck through or underscored type The more substantive changes include replacement of section 1 to exclude the incorrect conclusion that the request is classified as an (e)(2) change under state law In its place a reference has been added that an advertised public hearing is being held in connection with approval of the request. Outstanding staff comments have also been inserted, as well as updating Exhibit "B" with the most recently received master plan revision RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the attached ordinance be approved on second and final reading T JH dim Attachments xc Central File D'\SHARE\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\DRI\CCAGENDA.WPD Page 2 Memorandum No 96-659 Quantum Park PID MPMD 96-007/DRI 96-003 Therefore, until that happens, staff is requesting the note be removed Relocation of commercial lots impacts county and state roads, therefore it is not recommended to exclude agencies having jurisdiction over these roads from master plan amendments affecting these roads. (Also the city does not have a traffic engineer on staff ) Lastly, DCA has responded verbally to this application and concurs with the written response from TCRPC (attached) received since this staff report was prepared As detailed in the attached staff report, the issue is the difference between the state law processing requirements contended by the applicant versus DCA and TCRPC Staff concurs with DCA and TCRPC, due to the lack of evidence submitted with the application, and the date the application was submitted (less than the 30 days permitted by law between submittal and approval) However, staff is recommending that this request go forward for approval, subject to staff comments on December 17th Since TCRPC has extended themselves, due to the lack of evidence submitted with the application, by determining that there are no additional regional impacts caused by this request, the only possible grounds on which the state could appeal this approval is the processing time and the length of time public notice was provided Although not required by law for the type of change contended by the applicant, staff exercised caution by planning to execute this amendment by ordinance which requires an advertised public hearing TJH dim Attachments xc Central File Oo\SHARE\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\MPMD\CCAGENOA.WPO EXHIBIT "0" Conditions of Approval Project name: Qunantum Park File number' MPMD 96-007/DRIA 96-003 Reference: Master Plan. Amendment NO.7. dated December 4. 1996 (see Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 96-651) I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I PUBLIC WORKS 'N~ UTILITIES FIRE POLICE . NONI= ENGINEERING DIVISION . NONI= BUILDING DIVISION - . NONI= PARKS AND RECREATION FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST . NONI= PLANNING AND ZONING Comments. 1 Note 4 which states, "Lots within the project designated for commercial land use may be changed/relocated by approval of the City Commission without further DRI review or amendment" shall be deleted from the master plan. 2, The designation of Lots 80-82 shall be changed from office to industrial! commercial on the master plan. 3 If BGI has not applied for and received building permits by December 31, 1999, the use designation of lots 32-38 shall revert to office. 4 A check in the amount of $1,698.68 shall be submitted to the city which is the balance owed for the DCA transmittal of the last land use amendment recently adopted ( $500), plus $1 198.68 for the last DRI amendment ($47047 for ad and $1,228.21 for staff review expenses, minus the $500 retainer that was received with the application). ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 5. Delete Comment NO.3 ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 6 To be determined. T JH.dim D'\SHARE\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\BGI\DRIA\CONDAPPR. WPD HANDOUT #2 7.B.l. USE APPROVAL 7.C.l MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT QUANTUM PARK PID (0. M<Ut\L.\\ 5~\- BJ Stutts & Bowen .12-10-96 .1e :3AM . Shutts & BC_\ien~ '0737:6357 :. ill rn@~nw ~ PlANNING AND ZONING DEPT. SHUTIS & BOWEN ATIORNBVS AND COVlIiSEU.ORS AT LAW 110 PAnllllllsHlP ~\lDrNCl PlIO'ISSIONAL ASSOCiATlONSI 1500 MIAMI C5l1'Tl!R 201 SOU'l'li IlISeA YNB BOULlY AIlt) l\!1AMI, FLOIltl)A 33lS1 M1AMI1305i a"-53~O IlROWARD (305) 481-834' rACSIMll.E (305) 38H08z December 10, 1996 VIA FACSIMcrLE 407/375-6357 MS. Tambr1 Heyden Planning and Zoning Oirector City of B.nton Beach 100 East Benton Beach Benton Beach, Florida Boulevard 3342.5-0310 Re: Quantum Associatee - NOpe to DR! and PID Use Approval Oear Tambr1: Secaus. of my inability to attend tonight '8 Planning and Development Board Meeting, I would appreciate your distribution of the enclosed memorandum to the Board members for their consideration at tonight's meeting Please call me at your earliest convenience if you would 11ke to discu.. any of my comments. JGW/sJftW Enclosure ee: Steven E. Flvel, Esquire w/enclosure (Telecopy 317/263-7038) Susan Dele;al, Esquire w/enclosure (Telecopy 954/463-2030) 0IU832at'.1 IMW .......-IllD..'" OPPleE IUIIOP.. IO:JLEV"'''I)'' IW AI) ..ManllO...... THE ~ET>iE'lL.'ItlS "'1;LBPIlONE Cl'.11 fO-60I'OM' F,&,,~Sj~r~Cl )'J~Z:)."".14" lCBV LA"GO OFfICI OI:."H 1II~ ew. " oceAN IIEBP OIlIVE sum 4tOt. oc=IAN U!P 'l.O~ K1~ LAIlGO. noN))A 1.lC3T 'l1l:.BPHOIn!!!llaIW_1 LONDONOfP1a . t.lOU~:':' 'nI.'" l.O"IlON W\~ IIIl: l"G~l> 'l1l~PHON. 011 ~111..n-4840 'ACSIMlLE Cll...t~ "........ OllV.NflO OFFICI fC NOR':'>! ;)M"IGE AV[NVI ~umn:>oC OIl~.NI)O. PlOIl'DA ,fie' TIJ.EPW\)Nllft07J 'U.UOC ....CSIM,:.. '4011 UI.UI. WII~""U! .."ell OI"f,eE ONE CUlAIlUK[ Cll''''._'UlT'! ... too AUSTI'AI.'MIAVl!ron;E 5C1."J); WIST PAL" .EACH. 'LO'.IDA "+f1 MA.:i.i"lG ^~Pltl~5 r o. .~x..., WaST '..1."1 q..ell. 'LORIDA "40~.J~" TlL""ONI1401,..-0 ncsJw.". (ROTlISO.I,UIl -----.-.-- ---'--1:. SENT 5Y Shw~ts & B~wen 12- C-95 10 54AM Sh..:tts 8< 9o~er:~ v3 ~ : MEMORANDUM '1'0 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING AKD DEVELOP~NT BOAR[ C/O MS TAMBR! HEYDEN FROM: JAMES G. W!LUL~, ATTORNEY FOR QUANTUM ASSOCIATES SUBJECT USE APPROVAL AN~ MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION 1)ATi: : December 10, 1996 Due to an unavoidable conf:_ct, I wi:l not be ao.e :0 personally attend to~igh~'s Planning and Developmen: Seard mee:.-q Therefore, ! would like this .etter ~c be made part of the recc=c considered by you as you ma~e your recommendations a: tcn_g _'s rneet_nq Item 7.B. - U~e ~?r~val I concur with staff's recornrnendat.on on the Use Approva_ ar.d have ne objections to the Conditions 0= Approva: se~ :~~t~ i:,. Exhibit "C". Attorney Susan Deleqa.... from the Holland & Kr.iq~: ...a..; firm, representinq B~I Ind~stries, Inc., will be at tonlg~~'! meeting on behalf of BGr Please cor.sider any co::r.=.ei:S desired to be ~ade by Ms Delegal Par~Qr~h 1.C.l. M8ster P~~n Mod]fica~i~n. The following corn:nents re_ate to the correspond_nr;_ y numbe:=ed comments contained in Conditions of Approva. set forth in Exhibit "D" to the staff report 1. We object to the deletion of note 4 This note ~as specif~ca~ly negotiated and approved by tte City Co~~issi~r last July after inp~t by the deve_oper, City staff and V.r Greg Stuart from D::A In fact, Mr Stuart spec1fica~ly app=oved the lanquaqe of this note The effort by City staff to delete note 4 at this time is inapprop=iate and bea~s ~o connection to the ~and use change 1nvclv1~g the BG! transaction that is before the Board. 2. Aqreed !tis change has beer. made on the revlsec Master Site Development Plan dated Decerrber 6, which was de.~vered yee:erday to City stat! SEN~ :Y Sh~tts & Bowen ,12- 0-95 10 54AM SI'iJtts & ~owen" 14073756357,; ,: 3. We request condit_on 3 to be deleted We see ~o purpose served by this condition If the revised _and use is appropriate, it sho~ld not ~ake a differen=e when the building permit is obtained 4 Aqreed Associates. These fees will be paid by Quantum I apologize aqain for ~y inability to appear before yo_ this even1nq, but I appreciate your coneideration of the foregoing comments. JGW/smw cc Susan Oeleqal, Esquire Steven E Fivel, Esquire OIUllU$II.1 . taM' 2 7.C.l MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION QUANTUM PARK PID PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 96-651 FROM ChaIrman and Members Planmng and Development Board Tambn J Heyden, AICP ~ Planmng and Zomng DIrector TO DATE December 6, 1996 SUBJECT Quantum Park - MPMD 96-007/DRIA 96-003 Master Plan Amendment (office/R&D/industnal, lots 32 - 38 and Industnal/ commercial, lots 80-82) NATURE OF REQUEST Quantum Park of Commerce, a partially built-out Development of RegIOnal Impact (DR!) compnsed of 5399 acres, zoned PID (Planned Industnal Development), IS located on the west sIde ofI-95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton (C-16) Canal (see attached location map - ExhibIt "A") James G Willard, EsqUIre and agent for Quantum AssocIates, property owner of the Quantum Park of Commerce, has requested an amendment to the Quantum Park DR! development order, OrdInance No 84-51 as amended by OrdInance No 86-11,86-37,88-3,94-10,94-51 and 96-33 The proposed amendment IS for the purpose of revlSlng the master plan (master SIte development plan) to reflect the use of lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 currently deSIgnated for office use, as office/research and development/industnal use and to reflect the use of lots 80, 81 and 82, currently deSIgnated for office use, as Industnal/commercIaI use. BACKGROUND The amendment request IS governed by SectIOn 7 of AppendIx A, ZonIng, CIty of Boynton Beach Code of OrdInances, wluch estabhshes Planned Industnal Development DIstncts and by Chapter 380 06 (19), Flonda Statutes, Developments of RegIOnal Impact - Substantial DeViatIOns. ThIS amendment IS submItted In connectIOn WIth a request from the apphcant that: 1) the CIty make a determInatIOn that the master plan amendment IS not substantial In nature and 2) the proposed change to the Quantum Park DR! development order a) IS not a substantial deViatIOn b) does not reqUIre further Development of RegIOnal Impact reVIew and c) IS not subject to a pubhc heanng for purposes other than for passage of an ordInance to amend the ongInal Quantum Park DR! development order estabhshed by ordInance. Tills amendment procedure Will reqUIre a one-time change to our development regulatIOns. For non- development of regIOnal Impact planned Industnal developments, the CIty CommIssIOn must make a findmg related to the degree of change, that IS, whether or not It IS substantial, and then, the PlannIng and Development Board approves, approves WIth modIficatIOn, or demes the request. In thIS Instance, the CIty CommISSIOn must approve any change Therefore, the PlannIng and Development Board must act In an adVISOry capaCIty to the CIty CommISSIOn, as the State Statutes prevaIl over CIty ordInances. / Page 2 Memorandum No 96-651 Quantum Park - MPMD 96-007/DRIA 96-003 ANAL YSIS The amended master SIte development plan, (see attached ExhibIt "B") submItted by Quantum ASSOCIates, wIth the proposed redesIgnatIOn of 23 58 acres of office use as office/research and development/industnal use, IS compared WIth the mIX m acres ofland use as ongma11y approved and currently approved as follows LAND USE ORIGINAL APPROVED PROPOSED INCREASE/ DECREASE Commercial 276 N/A N/A 0 Office 1289 9862 7504 -24% Office/Commercial N/A 657 657 0 Office/Hotel/Commercial N/A 13 65 13 65 0 Office/G&I N/A 2.39 2.39 0 Office/Hotel N/A 11 57 11.57 0 Office/R&D N/A 603 603 0 Club N/A 34 34 0 Industnal 2547 115.35 11535 0 w/R&D Industnal/CommercIaI N/A 2655 26.55 0 Industnal/R&D/Office N/A 23 19 4677 202% R&D 32 11 32 11 0 Gov't/ N/A 369 369 0 Inst' I R&D/G&I N/A 24 24 0 Open Space/ 82.2 9667 9667 0 Lakes/ w/ DetentIOn! preserve Wetlands Preserve 400 400 0 Roads 466 41 13 41 13 0 TOTALS 5399 553 83 553 83 N/A J Page 3 Memorandum No 96-651 Quantum Park - MPMD 96-007/DRIA 96-003 From the table above, the ongmal 1984 DRI contamed 2547 acres of mdustnal/research and development desIgnated land. There have been SIX amendments to the DRI smce then. The last amendment allowed a total of 205 63 acres of mdustnal/research and development desIgnated land (thIS acreage total IS mIsleadmg because the ongmal master plan dId not allow the optIOn of dIfferent land uses on a gIven parcel as IS the case now, whIch exaggerates the current total) The proposed amendment (that part affectmg lots 32-38) mcreases the current total to 229.21 acres, WhICh IS an mcrease of 10% over the prevIOUS amendment, but IS not an mcrease over the ongmal DRI (one of the state cntenon for determmmg what constItutes a substantial deViatIOn), as the total IS stIll 25 49 acres less than the ongmal DRI. With respect to the portIon of the subject amendment affectmg lots 80-82, thIS use change was actually part of the prevIOUS amendment submItted earlIer thIS year ThIS part of that amendment had to be deleted at the publIc hearmg as It was m connectIOn With a reqUIred land use amendment applIcatIOn that was submItted concurrently WIth the prevIOUS DRI/master plan amendment, rather than pnor to the amendment (i.e. - state law reqUIres that the land use amendment must be adopted pnor to a related DRI amendment) Therefore, It was agreed by the applIcant, the CIty, the Department of Commumty AffaIrs (DCA) and the Treasure Coast RegIOnal Planmng CouncIl (TCRPC) that thIS part of the amendment would be resubmItted m the future. Smce thIS aspect of the applIcatIOn was already reVIewed for local, use 10catIOnal Issues and traffic Issues WIth the prevIOUS amendment, It IS bemg treated by staff as preVIOusly reVIewed, havmg no addItIOnal Impacts. Under Flonda Statutes, Chapter 38006(19) Substantial DeViatIOns, there are five major cntena, (a)- (e), that are used to determme whether a proposed amendment constItutes a substantIal deVIatIOn, whether a publIc hearmg IS reqUIred, whether an amended development order IS necessary and determme the mmImum tIme frame, as well as, the maXImum tIme frame wIthm whIch an amendment can be approved by a local government. The applIcant states that thIS change falls under (e )(2) of the above-referenced sectIOn and chapter of Flonda Statutes, whIch would not reqUIre a publIc hearmg and places no lImItatIOn on the mmImum tIme frame wIthm whIch thIS amendment could be approved. However, m order to fall under an (e )(2) type change, the change must be less than 40% (eIther cumulatIvely or mdIvIdually) of 32 acres (the threshold for mdustnal use for thIS project gIven ItS SIze) The change proposed IS 23 58 acres or 79% and therefore IS conSIdered to be an (e)(3) type change (a change not speCIfically claSSIfied elsewhere under state law) An (e)(3) change requues a publIc heanng and cannot be approved m less than 45 days. The applIcant has requested a December 17, 1996 CIty CommISSIOn approval date whIch, based on the date the applIcatIOn was submItted, IS less than the 45 days allowed. State law does mdIcate that an (e )(3) change may be rebutted by "clear and convmcmg eVIdence" BGI IS a PeruVIan manufacturmg company that the CIty has been negotIatmg WIth for approXImately seven months to select Boynton Beach as theIr base of operatIOn over other competmg CItIes m three Flonda countles. When the Boynton Beach declSlon was made, the applIcant requested the CIty'S help m expedItmg thIS applIcatIOn (necessary to BGI as a contmgency to theu end of year land purchase) The TCRPC has verbally responded to thIS amendment (tlme dId not permIt wntten comments to be mcluded m thIS report) and has determmed that tills amendment IS an (e)(3) change Furthermore, they have a concern With a note (#4) on the master plan that would preclude theIr and the state's reVIew of further amendments mvolvmg commerCIally deSIgnated lots. With any redIstributIOn or redesIgnatIOn of land use WIthm a master plan, the follOWing local Issues are evaluated. 1 Does the redIstributIOn/redesIgnatIOn of land use result m a change m concept for the Quantum Park of Commerce or the abIlIty of the Park to develop m a qualIty manner? ,3 Page 4 Memorandum No 96-651 Quantum Park - MPMD 96-007/DRIA 96-003 2 What Impact wIll the land use redlstributIOn/redeslgnatIOn have on projected expendItures whIch wIll be spent wlthm the regIOn? 3 Does the Impact of the land use redlstributIOn/redeslgnatIOn result m a conflIct WIth the number, type and payroll level of Jobs projected m Quantum Park's ApplIcatIOn for Development Approval (ADA)? 4 What Impact wIll the land use redlstributIOn/redeslgnatIOn have on adjacent property? 5 Will there be an mcrease m traffic resultmg from the land use redlstributIOn/redeslgnatlon? The trend of mIxed land uses, as proposed, IS supported by the mtent stated m the Planned Industnal Development Dlstnct RegulatIOns whIch reads as follows. "The purpose of thIS dlstnct IS to proVIde a zomng claSSIficatIOn for lIght mdustnal development that wIll better satIsfy current demands for lIght mdustnal zoned lands by encouragmg development WhICh WIll reflect changes m the technology of land development and relate the development of land to the specIfic SIte and to conserve natural amemtIes." Furthermore, as shown on the attached ExhibIt C - ongmal DRI master plan, more than 50% of the lots wlthm Quantum Park WhICh are affected by the proposed redeslgnatIon of land use were ongmally slated for mdustrlal use. Also, as prevIOusly mentIOned, although the ongmal master plan reflected more mdustnal/research and development mdustna1 acreage than the current total. The proposed acreage total IS a 10% mcrease over the current total. Therefore, the proposed change IS m keepmg WIth the ongmal Quantum Park concept as a planned mdustnal park. With regard to the Impact of the proposed change on projected expendItures wlthm the regIOn and proJected Jobs, lots 32 - 38 are planned to be developed by Beauty Group InternatIOnal Industnes, Inc (BGI) for cosmetIc, perfume and Jewelry manufacturmg. The company expects mltIally to employ 250-300 persons, of whIch 40-50 WIll be managenal or technIcally tramed personnel. The remammg employees wIll be unskIlled productIOn workers Eventually, the company plans to operate two 8-hour slufts and employ 400 persons. The maJonty of the managenal and technIcally tramed personnel, and the entIre unskIlled labor force, wIll be hIred from the local populatIOn. In addItIon, BGI expects to purchase a sIgmficant portIOn of ItS raw matenal needs from local supplIers and hopes to develop strong tIes to the local economy As to the Impact of the proposed research and development mdustnal change on adjacent propertIes, there IS reSIdentially-zoned property mllnedIately to the east. Tlus property IS vacant and although zoned reSIdentIal, the CIty'S comprehenSIVe plan recommends that the property be developed as a planned mdustnal development. A penmeter buffer of 25 feet m WIdth between the two propertIes was approved as part of a recent PID greenbeltlslgnage plan. Lastly, relatIve to traffic, offices uses generate more tnps per day than mdustnal uses. A traffic study submItted mdIcates that thIS use amendment represents a 53% reductIOn m PM peak hour trIpS projected from the prevIOUS office use deSIgnatIOn. Consequently, no addItIOnal traffic can be expected beyond that whIch has already been prOjected for the Quantum Park DRI RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend's the followmg if Page 5 Memorandum No 96-651 Quantum Park - MPMD 96-007/DRIA 96-003 1) that the CIty hold a CIty CommISSIOn publIc hearmg on December 17th, 1996 (meetmg the standard 10 day notIce for ordmances to adopt a revIsed development order, rather than the 15 days for an (e)(3) change), 2) that the Planrung and Development Board and CIty ComnllSSIOn make the followmg findmgs a) that tills applIcatIOn IS not a substantIal change by local codes WIth respect to the reVlSlons proposed and b) that thIS applIcatIOn does not constItute a substantIal deVIatIOn under state law 3) that thIS applIcatIOn be approved subject to the condItIOns m ExhibIt D (Removal of master plan note #4 IS mcluded as a condItIOn to brIdge the gap between TCRPC's pOSItIon that tills amendment IS a (e)(3) change and staffs deSIre to process thIS as an (e)(2) change. Furthermore, It IS not m the CIty'S best mterest to preclude DCA's or TCRPC's abIlIty to comment on a proposed amendment, espeCIally when state and county roads are Impacted by the DRI TJH.dIm Attachments xc ApplIcant Central FIle D-\SHARE\ WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM\MPMD\ST AFFREP WPD 5' E X H I BIT "A" & EXHIBIT "B" g r- ~ ;, ? -:J . ~ ------ - ---~- _!J """"': ! -::J:-:J ~ il '-"!--, )' t , l NOTES n -=---~=---=-:--- -:: J iI';; I h'!1 ~ :;!I;; "!j:, i;!/il II;!' " -- _ow .. ... / I i i ! I~ r -- -, -:Jl 1 .J -=-:J " ,1i'1 1'1 1 ,,:ii' ~ : ~ ; i i il'r: ,!: ! : ; ~ : !oi' jl!~ ","i' ~, ~i' I':; .wn rei "i ; ~~"I" ,I"i, :,'1' - .. . J-~ .. ~ .. """ ~ CATt.AT BLVD. :r' , 51 ~--~'-:iF== -=~f -l~- ~ .. .. ~__ om:v=:--- ... "=' - -:":'" .. """ - ...-....:::;'" ,/:// j :", /' I .. .. t! j & .. -- - -- -. -- '.J ~l LW.O.D. [QUAUZING CANAl C-16 -= = MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 7 NOVEMBER 7 1996 THIS PQlII'1.or. or F.ut. ROi:;!'; Ilk VC I.:> 8f v.......ru, , HE 1.... OT lWf. I1IGH SCHOClI. O('.'(LoPtCNT ... ACCORClNtCr WITI'I OIl. AWtNOtll(NT ",. . DA.T[rJ 4/19/9. 2 O(V[LO....O\l1 OF Ti'€ fOUOlrINC L..UIO US[ CLASStrIC..llOJrfS SHOlA.L [x:[([: f'0L&.0WINC INIEHSmES WITHOUT fURTHER CfT"I APHOwL ~ (lfitCl~ .. . 0' 2.7I4.l!l4 SO " GROSS nOOlt .,pE" C<-tJIC~ (INCLlJOl..c. ..om ,CLUB) 426.888 so n Gfl':':;'~ lU-':.A.8.E 'tOT TCt excEEO 47 TOTAL ACRES orf'!C.[ 1."5.1'12 so " CflQSS F\J)Clft 01,/1:[,1. ON( HOTEl ROOW 2A so n CROSS ~[ Mu. COUYER(,A... J TOlAL W:STEt' TIIlP5 fOR THE PROJEct $IoW.J.. RI........ 6].7~2 AD' lOTS .... THE PffOJ[CT OCsrcuTtD n:lR COMW[RCIAL LAND USE ...~ 6[ CIoUoNG{fl/RElOCATtr> BY APQt:'::Ml.l or THE em COWJ,tl'iSlClfo 1lIm<()UT rURII1[r' DR- "[\"101 _....NT MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGEND ~...-lJ--1 ':' i (III rur) KEY PLAN Office Office/Commercial Office/Hotel/Commercial Office/Hotel Office/Industrial Office/R4cD Office/Gael Industnol/Commerclol Industriol/R&D/Office Industrial R&D R&D/G&I Governmental/In stitutiono! Wetlands Sand Pine Reserve Roads ....... -- {:} OP~~rkS:ACE ----i 5~~:~tlon ===1 75.04 Acres 6.57 Acres 13.65 Acres 11.57 Acres 23.58 Acres 6.03 Acres 2.39 Acres 26.55 Acres 2319 Acres 115.35 Acres 32.11 Acres 2.40 Acres 36.90 Acres 6 00 Acres 40.00 Acres 41 13 Acres QUANTUM ASSOCIATES National City Center 115 West Washington St Indianapolis IN 46204 (317) 636-1600 90_67 Acres 1~9ii TOTAL 5~3. 3 "...9 QUANTUM PARK ~ -... E X H I BIT "e" /0 0i BEACH '--' ..... "'~a"'a..a LANa u.. eYM.OL. u.. "c... ... C CDMM..a'AL. ..,.. ... a a.....c. 1.... .... I L'.NT INDU......."'" ......,. 4117.. L/W LAIiC.. a w.TL. ANIt .... 1... " _DAD. .... ... ..... . .a.. N ~ , , The I : I High Ridge II Cammerce, ~ ~- ~:~ ~ .... ...' ...... ..17".4 MI..... . . . I --------&- ---------r . 4'.- Tit. D.. L.. ..~ ItUD . .; I --=='"F~ I I I I I The Mat:arale ~Iant: SIt:e . < . u .... L.a.Na D LAND U.. 8.. AC".. " 2 o ~ :> II W 11 II H W Ii I lH 2 ~51f ~ #~ 2 W :! Do o .I W > W o THE ...... ::e~:.'i~y BOYNTON , I l. r. I I l!J ~ Do ~ U II o 2 ~ .I II DF CDMMERCE ~ ~ By Rlt:eco Development: Carp.:! MA~ H-1 PARK Cf?-LG I NAL- tv1.t'rST€-t-2... ~ 1/ EXHIBIT "D" l:f '- EXHIBIT "0" Conditions of Approval Project name. Qunantum Park File number' MPMD 96-007/DRIA 96-003 Reference. Master Plan. Amendment NO.7. dated December 4. 1996 (see Plannina and Zoning Deoartment Memorandum No. 96-651) DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - N()N~ UTILITIES N()N~ FIRE . NONF POLICE NONF ENGINEERING DIVISION NONF BUILDING DIVISION - . N()N~ PARKS AND RECREATION NONF FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST l NONF PLANNING AND ZONING Comments. 1 Note 4, which states, 'Lots within the project designated for commercial land use may be changed/relocated by approval of the City Commission without further DRI review or amendment" shall be deleted from the master plan 2, The designation of Lots 80-82 shall be changed from office to industrial/ commercial on the master plan 3 If BGI has not applied for and received building permits by December 31 1999 the use designation of lots 32-38 shall revert to office. 4 A check in the amount of $1 69868 shall be submitted to the city which is the balance owed for the DCA transmittal of the last land use amendment recently adopted ($500) plus $1 19868 for the last DRI amendment ($47047 for ad and $1,228.21 for staff review expenses, minus the $500 retainer that was received with the application) ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 5 To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 6 To be determined T JH dim D'\SHARE\WP\PROJ ECTS\QUANTUM\BGI\DRIA\CONDAPPR.WPD /3 ~/ .O_'{!Ji'O. , V/. ~. I. / .,A., ....., .:v 01 ' ~i~ .,)"l: /....~ I ." V" :y.. ~ .' CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH ~oC ~~p:!ID, I AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FO !~q!G ! C1 Preliminary Draft o Revised Draft rn Final Submittal o January 7 1997 Date Final Form MU!ll be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Mu. be Turned into City Manager's Office Meeting Datell into City Manager's Office November 25, 1996 o February 4, 1997 January 29 1997 December II, 1996 o February 18. 1997 February 12. 1997 December 30. 1996 o March 4, 1997 February 29 1997 January IS 1997 o Man:b 18. 1997 March 12. 1997 Requested City Commission Meeting Dates I!I December' 19% o December 17 1996 o January 21 1997 NATURE OF AGENDA ITEM a Adrmnistrative a Bid fD Legal a Consent a PublIc Heanng a Unfmlshed Busmess a Presentation a New BUSIness 0- Other DESCRIPTION OF AG END A ITEM (attach additional sheets and 511pporting documeatatiOD if necessary) PUBLIC HEARING-Cons ide rat ion 0 f making a determination that the proposed changes to the Quantum Park D.R I (revising the Master Site Development Plan to include industrial use, together with office use, as a permitted land use for Lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36. 37 and 38) do not constitute a substantial deviation as those changes are related to the present submittal on behalf of Beauty Group International (BGI) RECOMMENDATION Approval of the ordinance on first reading after the conclusion of the Pub1ic Hearing All staff comments and concerns on this matter will be submitted to the City Commission prior to the second reading and public hearing scheduled for the December 17. 1996 City Commission meetin2. Department Head's Signature /0 ^ C' ~ \ )nlc ~ j' L......l...L~'- ---- City Manager's Signa~ II - ._~.... ..",... ,.......... ,.r n ?l I I r~l '" '-' OJtD!IGIIC. NO 0'6- AB omt1fAHCll 01' TIQI CIn eoJDaSIIOII 01' TRB CITY or IOYlftOII BDar, n.oamA. PJtOVIDIITG POR A OJITmualfA'l'IOlf 'I'D'!' CDHG.. TO '1'111 COIIP....8IW Dnm.oPIUDIT or RBGIOHAL IMPACT APPaoYm) m ORDDI>>ICa 110. 8"- 51. AIm AllDDm I. ORD~ NOS. .'-11, "-3', 88-3. 't-l0, '4-51 AJQ) "-33, J)() NOT COB8'U'l'U'l'B A SUBI'l'AII'l'IAL DBVIA'I'IOlf mma CHAPTD 380 .06, ",oaD>A STA'rU'RS, 1'" . DBTmaaNDtG TDT 1110 J'tlA"&.... Dnm.oPllD'l' 01' UGIOlIAL IMPACT IlBVIn IS ..aS8M'!' UGAJa)DfQ SUCH CHANCDS. upaOVI.g SUCH CJIUO.8, AIIIND%1tt1 '1"HJI D&'ftLOPlClln' OItJ)D (OaDIMANCB ROS. 8t-51, 86-11, 81-37;-88-3, '4- 10, '.-51 >>1D "-33) 1'OJt PUUOSIS OJ' IlfCOJtPOItA'I'%MG 'rRII APPaovBJ) ClfAHCD8, pROV%DIn roa COID'LIC'l'S. anuuILITY. CODIt'ICATIOH AIm AM ....crzw DAD. WP'IItSAI, Riteco Development Corporation, a Florida corporation (llRiteco.) filed with the City of Boynton Beach (the "City") an Application for Development Approval of Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact (the "ADA") on May 21, 1984, regarding that certain property (the .Propertytl) dellcribed in Exhibit wAil, attached hereto and made a part hereof; and ....~, the ADA wa. approved and the Development Order for the Property was granted December 18, 1984 and pursuant to Ordinance No. 8.-51 (the -Development Order-); and CODING: Words in .'~.k .R.e'li!ft type are deletion from exiat1ng law; Worda in under8cor~d type are addition. Page 1 of 6 ~, Riteco subaequently conveyed its right, titles and interest in and to the Property to Boynton Park ot Commerce, Inc . a Florida corporation ("Boynton Park"), and, Boynton Park, in turn, subsequently conveyed its right, title and interest in and to the Property to Quantum A8sociat.., a Florida general partnership (the -Developer"); and WRaRaA8, Developer tiled with the City respective application to amend the Development Order, which applications were approved by the City in Ordinance No 86-11, Ordinance No 86-37, Ordinance No 88-3, Ordinance No 94-10, and Ordinance No 94~51; and WHDDS, the term "Development Order" incTudell all amendments thereto; and WHDDS, Quantum Associates, a Florida general partnership (-Developer") is the current owner and developer of the remaining vacant land within the project conmonly known a. Quantum Corporate Park at Boynton Beach DeveloptAent of Regional Impact (sometimes hereinafter called the "QuantUM Park ORI"); and 1fII'DDI, Developer haa submitted to the City a Notification of roposed Change to a previou8ly Approved Development of Regional Impact ("NOpc.) requesting a further amendment to the Development Order for the purpo8e of ravi8ing the Master Site Development Plan ,A-- R. 4. to include induatrial use, together with office use, as a permitted land use for Lots 32, 33,~~~~~, 35, 3~, 31, and 38 within Quantum Park; and -/-b ~ ~ fp. 1"1 ~ I" ~ ~: ~-u,-<z.~_/ -/'t;~~l ~~ p/lA'--t& 4 C ~/ l/[J CO~HG: Words in MNSk .Il..li!lt tYPe -are -CjeletTOn-lrom existing law; Words in under.cored type are additions Page 2 of 6 -r~ .,. ." ~KA8, the City Commission of Boynton Beach, as the governing body having jurisdiction, i8 authorized and empowered to consider applications for amendments to development orders approving developments of regional impact pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996); and WHJaKAS, said City Commission has considered the testimony, reports and other documentary evidence submitted at said public hearing by Developer, the City staff and the public, and the City Planning and Zoning Board'.. recormendation of the _ day of , 1996; and WBDDS, said City Commission haa con....idered all of the foregoing lION, TURUOU, .. IT ORDAIIIIID BY '1'HI CITY C0JGa8BIOlf OF TIm CITY O. BOnft'OR ...es, FLORIDA, 'l'JIAT. Section 1. Developer haa established that the proposed change individually or cumulatively with any previous Changes to the Development Order is less than forty (40') percent of any numerical criterion contained in Florida Statute Section 380.06(19) (b) 1 -15. and does not exceed any other criterion, and is not subject to the public hearing requirements of Chapter 3BO, I Florida Statutes Section 2. Developer has requ..ted that the Development order be amended to reflect that both Indu8trialf~~ Office land uses shall be permitted on Lote 32, 33, 34A, 348, 35, 36, 37 and 38 (}-,,~ ~ I!t- ~ tf ./dv Ot; f'/ ~~ t?~~ CODING: words in e.Nek &He. type are deletion from existing law; Words in unde~lIcq.ed type are additions Page 3 of 6 k-- ~h~// :~ ~ t~~ 11) (jJ>>vr>u/v~~ of Quantum Park and to reflect the approval and incorporation by reference of Master Plan Amendment No 7 to the Master Site Development Plan for Quantum Park dated November 7, 1996, a copy of which i8 attached a ibit "B". ,~. :;-fn~n -.' :J~_jk~~~111q(:, Section 3. Upon con.ideration of all matters described in Section 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996), it is hereby determined dee that: A The amendments proposed by Developer do not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to this area B. The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations C The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council on file in these proceedings D. The amendments proposed by Developer do not constitute a substantial deviation under Chapter 380 O~, Florida Statutes (1996) Se;tioQ i. The City Commdssion has concluded as a matter of law that the.. proceeding. have been duly eonducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996), that Developer is entitled to the relief prayed and applied for, and COOING Words in .'Nell ea~e~gk type are deletion from existing law; Word. in underseored type are addition. Page 4 of 6 -- ~ that the Development Order is hereby amended incorporating the amendment8 proposed by Developer as set forth in Section 2 above Section 5 Except as otherwise amended herein, the Development Order ehall remain in full force and effect Section 6. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed Section 7. Should any eection or provision of this ordinance or portion hereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent juriediction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this ordin~ce Section 8. Authority i. hereby granted to codify said ordinance Secti.on 9. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage PXRST ~Z8Q this ____ day of 1996 a.CORD. .%ML lmADDftJ AIm PASSACD this _ day of 1996 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Mayer Vice Mayor CODING: words in MIN.-A 'h".lI!1l type are deletion from exi.ting law; Words in unde~,cored type are addition. Page 5 of 6 Commissioner ATTEST Cotmlisllioner City Clerk Cotmliaaioner (CORPORATE SEAL) EXHIBITS: RAR - Legal Description "8" - Amended Master Site Development Plan ""./1. n/"N nona _ \OID !lit I OlD CODING Worde in s'Nell t!klP's\I!ft type are deletion from exiating law; Words in underscored type are additions Page 6 of 6 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO 96-672 FROM Dale Sugerman City Manager 0 I , tuv :v, 1A;.o ~ltl\... Tambri J Heyden, AICP ,~t J: J 'ft Planning and Zoning Directqr V' TO DATE August 19, 1996 SUBJECT Copies of Development Plans of Current Projects Scheduled for Review by the City Commission at the December 11, 1995 City Commission Meeting Please find attached five (5) sets of plans for the following current development projects Master Plan Modification - Quantum Park PID DRI 96-003 Orchard Landing Subdivision Master Plan SBMP 96-002 Hills at Lake Eden New Site Plan NWSP 96-011 Note Please return the plans/documents to the Planning and Zoning Department following the meeting If I can be of further assistance, please contact me T JH bme Attachments cc. Central File Subject File d:\share\agendas\citycomm\transdec. wpd NOTICE I I , I i Ii 8}j I' i The following proposed ordinances which are published by caption at the Regular City Commission meeting of the City Commissio EPI Boynton Beach, Florida, on the 3rd day of December, 1996 These ordinances shall be presented for proposed enactment by the City Commission at the Regular City Commission meeting at City Hall, in the Commission Chambers, 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd, Boynton Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, December 17th, 1996 at 7 '00 P M ORDINANCE #096-64 ..... AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, REGARDING THE REZONING OF BOYNTON COMMONS-.PCQ-J AMENDING ORDINANCE 91-70 OF SAID CITY BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 2 SECTION 6 F 13 OF THE CITY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. . "t,- \Y" ~. . '\ \['- , .}.-t \\)/ u- f ;;~- \Q/ {Q; ~;p5 ORDINANCE #096-65 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A DETERMINATION THAT CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF ,>X ~ REGIONAL IMPACT APPROVED IN ORDINANCE NO 84-51, AND yvf't"'; AMENDED IN ORDINANCE NOS 86-11,86-37,88-3,94-10,94-51 AND 96- {iYr &' 33, DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION UNDER ()",) \r CHAPTER 38006, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1996, DETERMINING THAT NO b\\Y \)Q; FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW IS NECESSARY REGARDING SUCH CHANGES, APPROVING SUCH CHANGES, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ORDINANCE NOS 84-51,86-11,86-37,88-3,94-10,94-51 AND 96-33) FOR PURPOSES OF INCORPORATING THE APPROVED CHANGES, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE Interested parties may appear at said meeting and be heard with respect to these proposed ordinances Subject ordinances may be inspected by the public at the Office of the City Clerk at said City Hall Pursuant to F S 286 0105, please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, he will need a record of this proceeding, and for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH SUZANNE M KRUSE,CMC/AAE CITY CLERK PUBLISH PALM BEACH POST FRIDAY, DECEMBER 6,1996 c City Mgr, City Attny, City Commission, Planning, Files MAS\ S'\CC\WP\ORDAD3. WPD