Loading...
APPLICATION FORM RPM-BSP-PROPCHANGE-1 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, Florida 32399 904/488-4925 QUANTUM PARK NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) SUBSECTION 380 06(19), FLORIDA STATUTES Subsection 380 06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved DRI be made to the local government, the regional planning agency, and the state land planning agency according to this form 1 I, JAMES G WILLARD, the undersigned authorized representative of QUANTUM ASSOCIATES, hereby give notice of a proposed change to a previously approved Development of Regional Impact in accordance with Subsection 380 06(19), Florida Statutes. In support thereof, I submit the following information concerning the QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK (formerly known as Boynton Beach Park of Commerce) development, which information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge I have submitted today, under separate cover, copies of this completed notification to City of Boynton Beach, to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, and to the Bureau of State Planning, Department 1/ - 17 - '1 b (Date) 2 Applicant (name, address, phone). Quantum Associates, a Florida general partnership Attn Steven E Fivel, Esquire National City Center 15th Floor, East Tower 115 West Washington Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 317/263-7936 (Office) 317/263-7038 (Fax) 3 Authorized Agent (name, address, phone). James G Willard, Esquire Shutts & Bowen 20 North Orange Avenue, Suite 1000 Orlando, Florida 32801 407/423-3200 (Office) 407/425-8316 (Fax) 4 Location (City, County, Township/Range/Section) of approved DRI and proposed change. The Quantum Corporate Park DRI is located in Sections 17 and 20, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida The description of the property which is the subject of the proposed change is as follows Lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38, Quantum Park at Boynton Beach, P I D Plat No 3, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 60, Page 29, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida 5 Provide a complete description of the proposed change Include any proposed changes to the plan of development, phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build-out date, development order condi tions and requirements, or to the representations contained in either the development order or the Application for Development Approval. Indicate such changes on the project master site plan, supplementing with other detailed maps, as appropriate. Additional information may be requested by the Department or any reviewing agency to clarify the nature of the change or the resulting impacts. -2- Applicant seeks to expand the permitted land use for Lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 to include "Industrial" as well as "Office" uses Attached as Exhibit "A" is proposed Master Plan Amendment No 7 dated November 7, 1996, reflecting the foregoing change The Applicant submits that the proposed change is non- substantial for the following reasons A Industrial land use for the subject lots is consistent with the overall zoning of Quantum Park, which is Planned Industrial Development B The use of the property as Industrial is consistent with the character of the surrounding area and the general development plan contemplated by the Quantum Park DRI C There is substantial Industrial development capacity still available from the 2,784,354 square feet of gross floor area within Quantum Park that is approved for Industrial development D Approval of the Industrial land use for the subject property will accommodate a market demand for the specified lots while still leaving an ample supply of land available for Office use within Quantum Park 6 Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Determination Chart for all land use types approved in the development. If no change is proposed or has occurred, indicate no change No change to the DRI is proposed other than as set forth in paragraph 5, above Because of the multiple land use designations on many of the lots within the DRI project, the Applicant submits that completion of the Substantial Deviation Determination Chart would not be productive 7 List all the dates and resolution numbers (or other appropriate identification numbers) of all modifications or amendments to the originally approved DRI development order that have been adopted by the local government, and provide a brief description of the previous changes (i.e., any information not already addressed in the Substantial Deviation Determination Chart) Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the last approval or development order was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new DRI development order for the project? -3- Original Development Order December 18, 1984 First Amendment to Development Order June 3, 1986 Second Amendment to Development Order October 21, 1986 Third Amendment to Development Order February 2, 1988 Fourth Amendment to Development Order April 19, 1994 Fifth Amendment to Development Order November 15, 1994 Sixth Amendment to Development Order July 16, 1996 The purpose of each amendment was to change the Master Site Development Plan to achieve more flexible land use approval There has been no change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development. 8 Describe any lands purchased or optioned within 1/4 mile of the original DRI site subsequent to the original approval or issuance of the DRI development order. Identify such land, its size, intended use, and adjacent non-project land uses within 1/2 mile on a project master site plan or other map. No additional lands were purchased or optioned since the approval of the initial Development Order 9 Indicate if the proposed change is less than 40\ (cumulatively with other previous changes) of any of the criteria listed in Paragraph 380 06(19)(b), Florida Statutes Because the proposed change does not seek to add any development intensity to the DRI, Applicant contends that the proposed change is therefore less than 40% of any of the criteria listed in paragraph 380 06(19)(b), Florida Statutes -4- Do you believe this notification of change proposes a change which meets the criteria of Subparagraph 380.06(19)(e)2 , F.S. YES x NO 10 Does the proposed change result in a change to the buildout date or any phasing date of the project? If so, indicate the proposed new buildout or phasing dates. The proposed change does not result in a change to the buildout date or any phasing date of the Project 11. Will the proposed change require an amendment to the local government comprehensive plan? The proposed change will not require an amendment to the local government comprehensive plan 12 An updated master site plan or other map of the development portraying and distinguishing the proposed changes to the previously approved DRI or development order conditions. The proposed Amended Master Site Development Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" 13 Pursuant to Subsection 380.06 (1) (f), F .A., include the precise language that is being proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development order This language should address and quantify: a. All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and build-out date of the development; to development order condi tions and requirements; to commitments and representations in the Application for Development Approval; to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts; to structures or to other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units; and other major characteristics or components of the proposed change; -5- b. An updated legal description of the property, if any project acreage is/has been added or deleted to the previously approved plan of development; c. A proposed amended development order deadline for commencing physical development of the proposed changes, if applicable; d A proposed amended development order termination date that reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development; e A proposed amended development order date until which the local government agrees that the changes to the DRI shall not be subject to down-zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, if applicable; and f. Proposed amended development order specifications for the annual report, including the date of submission, contents, and parties to whom the report is submitted as specified in Subsection 9J-2.025(7), F.A.C. The proposed Amended Development Order is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" -6- ORDINANCE NO 96- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A DETERMINATION THAT CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENS IVE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT APPROVED IN ORDINANCE NO 84- 51, AND AMENDED IN ORDINANCES NOS 86-11, 86- 37, 88-3, 94-10, 94-51 and 96-33, DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION UNDER CHAPTER 380 06, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1996, DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW IS NECESSARY REGARDING SUCH CHANGES, APPROVING SUCH CHANGES, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ORDINANCE NOS 84-51, 86-11, 86-37, 88-3, 94-10, 94-51 and 96-33) FOR PURPOSES OF INCORPORATING THE APPROVED CHANGES, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, Ri teco Development Corporation, a Florida corporation ("Riteco") filed with the City of Boynton Beach (the "City") an Application for Development Approval of Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact (the "ADA") on May 21, 1984, regarding that certain property (the "Property") described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the ADA was approved and the Development Order for the Property was granted December 18, 1984 and pursuant to Ordinance No 84-51 (the "Development Order"); and WHEREAS, Riteco subsequently conveyed its right, titles and interest in and to the Property to Boynton Park of Commerce, Inc , a Florida corporation ("Boynton Park"), and, Boynton Park, in turn, subsequently conveyed its right, title and interest in and to the Property to Quantum Associates, a Florida general partnership (the "Developer"); and EXHIBIT "B" WHEREAS, Developer filed with the City respective application to amend the Development Order, which applications were approved by the City in Ordinance No 86-11, Ordinance No. 86-37, Ordinance No 88-3, Ordinance No 94-10, and Ordinance No 94 51; and WHEREAS, the term "Development Order" includes all amendments thereto; and WHEREAS, Quantum Associates, a Florida general partnership ("Developer") is the current owner and developer of the remaining vacant land within the project commonly known as Quantum Corporate Park at Boynton Beach Development of Regional Impact (sometimes hereinafter called the "Quantum Park DRI"); and WHEREAS, Developer has submitted to the City a Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact ("NOpe") requesting a further amendment to the Development Order for the purpose of revising the Master Site Development Plan to include industrial use, together with office use, as a permitted land use for Lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 within Quantum Park; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of Boynton Beach, as the governing body having jurisdiction, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for amendments to development orders approving developments of regional impact pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996); and WHEREAS, said City Commission has considered the testimony, reports and other documentary evidence submitted at said public hearing by Developer, the City staff and the public, and the -2- City Planning and zoning Board's recommendations of the day of , 1996; and said City Commission has considered all of the WHEREAS, foregoing NOW THEREFORE, Boynton Beach, that findings of fact Section 1 A notice of public hearing in the proceedings was duly published on the day of , 1996, in The Post, a newspaper of general circulation in Boynton Beach, Florida, pursuant to Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes, and proof of said publication has been duly filed in these proceedings Section 2 Developer has requested that the Development Order be amended to reflect that both Industrial and Office land uses shall be permitted on Lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 of Quantum Park and to reflect the approval and incorporation by reference of Master Plan Amendment No 7 to the Master Site Development Plan for Quantum Park dated November 7, 1996, a copy of be it ordained by the City Commission of said City Commission makes the following which is attached as Exhibit "B" Section 3 Upon consideration of all matters described in Section 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996), it is hereby determined that A The amendments proposed by Developer do not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted state land development plan applicable to this area -3- B The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations C The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council on file in these proceedings D The amendments proposed by Developer do not consti tute a substantial deviation under Chapter 380 06, Florida Statutes (1996) Section 4 The City Commission has concluded as a matter of law that these proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes (1996), that Developer is entitled to the relief prayed and applied for, and that the Development Order is hereby amended incorporating the amendments proposed by Developer as set forth in Section 2 above Section 5 Except as otherwise amended herein, the Development Order shall remain in full force and effect. FIRST READING this day of , 1996. -4- SECOND READING and FINAL PASSAGE this ATTEST , 1996 day of CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MAYOR VICE-MAYOR COMMISSION MEMBER COMMISSION MEMBER COMMISSION MEMBER CITY CLERK EXHIBITS ORLANDO 29862,2 SMW Draft Date 11/18/96 "A" - Legal Description "B" - Amended Master Site Development Plan -5-