The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO PZ 01-220 TO Mayor Jerry Broening and City Commission FROM Lusia Galav, AICP Principal Planner DATE October 11,2001 SUBJECT Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 Master Plan Amendment #12 - Quantum Park and Village Addendum ADDENDUM This report is the addendum to the Department of Development Memorandum No PZ 01-214 to the Planning and Development Board dated October 4,2001 Updated information is provided regarding the above referenced project. Final Recommendations Regarding the modifications to the Quantum Park Master Plan, staff has revised the recommendation regarding Lot 34-C based on a compromise reached with the applicant. Staff does not object to revising the NOPC to allow the 6 58 acres in lot 34-C to be placed in a separate category labeled "reserved" until this site is evaluated to determine its appropriate use This recommendation is contingent upon satisfying revised condition #4 in the Conditions of Approval, Exhibit "I" attached Conditions of Approval - Exhibit "I" In addition, the Conditions of Approval Exhibit "I" has been revised to reflect additional information received subsequent to the release of the staff report. At this time the Department of Community Affairs has yet to provide any formal comments Attachments. 1 Letter from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council dated October 8 2001 2. Letter from Palm Beach County Traffic Division dated October 10 2001 3 Letter from Florida Department of Transportation dated September 4 2001 GCT-08-2001 11 38 P 02 -:; _ , ; ~. ~ i~.'1: ~:..:~ C ~ r~P.-..~.;;..,;;.~.;r7.:: ': - ='} " - . ~ ~~; r ~J. '. _. ',.,'~''''3" . .:.:l._-...._.~...... > ~_....... ~- ~. ~""'~'~.' . "'u ., ~_i'-,,,...."'=".:;;_,L~.-..__ '...--" ~:.., ;~-~'..-: ";..-:: .. -...:-.0; :~~-.,-. ~ -:.~.',_ .'~~', -, - ~J._ ..'t__":'::". _.!:.":..='w:;'" .:'...~.i ..:. .. . "'=.:-.., _:.._L__ :~~.~-;".ioQ';' .~_,;..._. -c:, J~~~ +-.~.. '--;--Tt.., . 'f(!;'if,. .,,~, '''<''~~''-''_' T R. ,., ,. =~ tm., ~':I.ii. '--ml' . ...:Jfii' . " '-". ,---,.... '- - c.:. ,,- ~-.. E A S':l.T-'D 1:;" F"_. . . , . , ." '-"-"', ~',.,.~ ~, "., -' ,. '- . .j~ .n ~ ... . "" .1.... "_ - -..~._.' \ I I ....... \: . . _':_:-0111-=. ~;) ~'l 4~ ,.- ~":~r.' f%;\:k.~E:f,4ANJ't.I N-.;.~' '._. p:U ~~7tL"~ " iJ7 . . .~ - ~ ... ;e"'''T' -.. i;l ~;' l' n I - ...=, ..". ... ,T- s,- ;.;,:.- ~-iiii::'If:.'" - -.~ :::,::~:..,' }1.: ~~.'~ ..!s ~::-.~, . ,~!.''-.. ,~~ '~'W:~ .; .:~~ ~!'';-'~r' ----"ft-\..;.~__. I=lt,'!?-fl ~~N~'k::p):;V!: .~.~;~~~.lt.~L~~p ~'-B i.~A c Ii ~ .~!fl~ thrC'i: J;~;-:; I.... _'r.. __ ~... ~.. '~_I "-";"-_"'':;;~''''''''__'''''':-'''I,~",:'.;-.__~':'....._._'-. ~~... . . ~.;...._ .. -:..'":-", ~}... ... :, ._. .._:- " . 'lo , .' ...;.,. -"...- '.1.-' "~'-I!< '--1.' ~.. '~.'''''--~ ~._.........----....-_._--, .. . OJ ~ I::r.: =- ::=:-,:...: -,.t. , 'J HI~!~i;O I- I.... ...~. ~.:-~."~, _ ._.. ..... . .". I' ~ ~"'=r '" .-:;t=' --..-, - .- '.J . . . ~, ;, .,;1J ~_~. _:~ ~._J, '--7"-~t. ~ ~~ i "_.::;" -:.~;" ~ ~:c: :,"~ i"':._ "'". \._ ~~~_~ October 8, 200 \ 'WI~~ L: ri; ~1 i L5 u ! i' Iii t 1: I: . .. !L. ~ Mr Michael W Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Flonda 33435 n Subject. Quantum Park Development of Regional Impact Notification of Proposed Change Dear Mr Rumpf: In accordance with the requirements of Section 38006(19), Florida Statutes (F.S), we have reVlewed the "Notificatton of a Proposed Change to a PreVIously Approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI)" (NOpe) tor the Quantum Park DR! dated August 8,2001 The Nope proposes the following revisions to the master plan: .I t 1) Lots 7, 8, 9, 10. and 11 land use designatlon \S to be changed from office/industrial to mIXed use, which allows office, commercial, and residential uses) 2) Lots 23. 24, 25, 26, 27, 28. 29 30, and 31 land use designation is to be changed from office to rruxed use, which allows office, commercial, and resIdential uses; 3) lot 34C which is currently undesignated and part of the open space area lS changed to industna1; and 4) Quantum Lakes Drive is proposed tor elimination from the intersection ~ith Quantum Boulevard to the eastern mtersectioD WIth Gateway Boulevard. The applicant proposes to decrease office and industrial square footage to allow additIonal commercial square footage and dwelling units. The proposed changes are presumed to create a substantial deVlation pursuant to Section 38006(I9)(e)3 and 380 06(19)(e)5 c, Flonda Statutes. Council has reviewed the Information and determined that the proposed changes will not create any additional regional impacts. Council recognizes and apprecJates the apphcant's efforts to create a good mix ofland uses and pro'r,de for a more sustamable tbrm "Bringing Communities Togetber" . Est 1976 lO\ Ea., 0"..... Soul" lOrd Slli,. ].0 ~ta.rl l' ..rid.. 34"4 l'bOtU (161) 221 4~.0 SC 16' UH f-'u (S6I) 211 ~Oln E Ill. I ,,-d'll'n@t"'''~''tU OC--08-2001 11 38 pro Mr Michael W Rumpf October 8, 2001 Page 2 of development for a portlOn of the project. However, Council is concerned. with the desIgnation of Lot 34C to indu$tnal This lot is adjacent to the sand pUle scrub preserve, Clty park and water retention area. The parcel was originaUy proposed for development but during an amendment to the project to address requirements Wltrnn the development order this area was designated for preservation and later part of the water retention area. Over time the overall open space area of the project has decreased and designating Lot 34C would be an additional reduction. Based on the location of the parcel and the further reductlqn in open space for the project, Staff does not recommend that the proposed change to mdustriaJ for Lot 34C proceed until. 1) the City evaluates the need for open space on the ptoJect and detemunes that the reduction in open space created by this change is consistent with City regulations; 2) it is demonstrated that development of tlus parcel will not interfere WIth management of the adjacent preserve area. and 3) it is demonstrated that development of this site will not have a negative impact on the established dramage system. Please call if you have any questlons. Smcerely, b?s~ DRI Coordinator J r cC Ken Metcalf, FDCA Eugene Gerlica, Applicant T07AL P 03 ____}Jl/10 '2001 15 04 5614341663 lBi10/20Bl 15 43 478577~ p.......at of ""'a~ ucI h'"e WO_ P.O. &ox ~I).~ w.. Palm Belch. PL 33416-1229 (561) ,.84..000 www.pbqiov,c;gm . ".1Il ka<:h Caunty aoard. of Councy CcIm......lon." WarRn H. NawlIlI. (:ltalrmUl Carol A.. l'.obet".& Vlee Chair !Unit T. Ma~us Mary McClrty 8urt MlClUOR 'lbny Mullom Addle l. Greene Ccnmty ~dll\la~r I\obert '.Velsman '.A~ J~J OpporNftiry IIt/!ir_ti-n Adfo" lm"oycy' @p,.,nMtl ,,,,~,,.,,. FINDER TROUTMAN ENGINEERING TRAFF- PAGE 02 PAGE 02 october 10, 2001 .- It r~ . ! 0 \ l~ l~r~l Oao ---.J P' t\CNW - \": __ - 7 .;. Mr Miet\1I1 W Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning Department Of Development City of Boynton 8each P.O Box 310 Boynton Beach. Fl 3<<25--0310 RE: Quantum Park - Arn.ndment "2 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE 8TANDARDS REVIEW Dear Mr Rumpf' The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement (received on August 17,2001) for the prOjeet entitled; Quantum Park- Amendment'12. pUniuant to the Traffie Performance Standards in Article 16 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The new proposed development plan for NOPO ", 2 Is IS follQWs: . Indu5trlal Retail OffIce Warehouie Hotel High School Auto O.aletship Movl. Thelter Restaurant. HT Restaurant. Quality Convenience Store/Gas Ice Skating Rink Multi Family Residential Part< & Ride Facility 1,700,000 SF 427,8e2 SF e37.000 SF 22,700 SF 200 Rooms 2500 Stuctents 53,072 SF 4,000 Seats 28,_00 SF 69,2S0 SF 3,054 SF 93,.30 SF 1 ,000 Dwellings N1A Based on our review, the Traffic DIvi$iOn has determined that the overall traffic g.neration Issociated with the newlV proposed development plan listed above (Nope ., 2), does not exceed the total trips vested for the QuantUl11 Part development, in the previously approved Nope ..10 (Aprf118, 2000) Therefor. the proposed plan j$ approved. It Is however, suggested to the clty of Boynton Beach Require from the traffic consultant II table comparing the project vested trips (based on the mos. recent approval), versus tripgeneratlon of all land US'S which have received development orderS. to elate. This practice needs to contlnue with any 'uture submissions, The Intersection ot Quantum Boulevard/Gatews., BOUlevard 15 foreca$ted to operate within .unacceptable- conditions, under Year 2006 scenarios, and upotl full completion Ind occupation of the project. This location needs to be monitored for future improvements, which needs to be Implemented by the developer . 10/10:2001 15 04 1e/16/2061 15.43 5514341553 478577~ pumER TROUTMAH ENGINEERING TRAFF:'" PAGE 03 PAGE 1213 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding this determinatlon. plel58 oontac:t me at 8844",030. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COU /0- cc: Pinder- Troutnwn CONuIlInO IrIC. MTP Group Inc, f~.: GtntrII TPS M"" Traffic Study RIYIew F '\TRAFFIC\IN\AdnIin'.Ap~'4)1 0812.doc SEP-11-2001 09 26 P 02 Florida Department of Transportatlon lED BUSH GOVERNOR OFFICE OF Pl.ANNING ilND ENVIRONMENTAL MANACEMENT - DISTRICT 4 3400 West Comrpm-cia! Blvd.. 3111 Floot. FL Lau~Il:. FI 33309.3421 Tclqlhonc: (954) 777-460 I Fu: (954) m~671 THO~AS F BARRY JR. SECRETARY September 4,2001 R~tt,.,,~#VE' . ~ ....., J(..!.c:r D SEF - 1 2001 Mr D Ray Eubanks Planning Manager Department of Community Affarrs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 TRf;~;Ji.,lP';' CiJAST REGIONAl. :PLANNIN(i COI.JNCIL Dear Mr Eubanks. j r- . l l r--~- .-.-_4-_... Ii' C'U1J; (ET 'i 0 200t L-______ _~ ~ ;', G ,0 - ~ --- , ----- - r~- - SUBJECT Quantum Park Development of Regional Impact (DRI) City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC) As requested 10 the letter from Mr James Snyder ofthe Treasure Coast Regional Planning Councll dated August 8, 200 I, the Department has reVlewed the Quantum Park Development df Regional Impact (DR!) Notification of Proposed Change (NOpe). The Quantum Park DR! was originally approved on December 18, 1984 as a :mixed-use development. TI1rough amendments the development order now approves the following land uses- commercial) industrial, government/instItutIOnal, office, recreation and hotel. ! ! In this NOPC (#12), the applicant proposes revisions to the DRI Master Plan to create a:mixed-use development that includes office. commerCIal, and residential uses. The applicant has p~oposed the following changes to the Master Plan. . ModIfying Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 from Office/Industrial to Mixed Use, which includes office, commercial, and reSIdential uses. This change decreases the Industrial Larid Use from , 2,275,354 square feet to 1,900,000 square feet. . . Modifying Lots 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31 from Office/Industrial to ~ixed Use, which includes office, commercial, and residential uses. This change decrease$ the Office Land Use from 798,772 square feet to 725,850 square feet. . The combinatIon of these chap.ges results in an increase In Residential Land Use from 500 dwelling units to 1,000 dwelling units. www.dot_stateJl.us S FleCYCLeo I'''PE;A , SEP-11-2001 09 26 P 03 Mr D Ray Eubanks September 4, 2001 Page 2 The reconfiguratlon of Quantum Lakes Dnve by closing the segment from: Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard resultIng In additional developable land to be ~ubdivided into Lots 100 and 101 The new lots are to be designated Mixed Use, which incl~des office, commercial, and resIdentlal uses. ! The Department offers the followmg comments. The change in resIdentIal development from 500 to 1,000 homes that was included in the substantial deviation determination chart was not described in the request for th~ NOPC. The reconfiguranon of Quantum Lakes Dnve results In redistributed traffic voltbes to the IntersectIon of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard. The intersection arlalysis that was provided with the NOPC Indicates that the increased volumes will cause the ilitersectton to fail unless the northbound and southbound approaches are re-striped from a sin~e left-tum lane with dual through lanes to a single left-turn, a single through lane, and a singlr right-turn lane. After the re-stnping, the intersection operates below the critical volume level. The applicant should specify the party responsible for the r~ping improvementjto current acceptable standards and Incorporate the Improvement as Condition in the! Amended Development Order pnOf to the closure of Quantum Lakes Dove. I . . Please indIcate how Parcel MU 61 will be accessed with the reconfigurationAclosure of Quantum Lakes Drive. In summary. the Quantum Park DR! NOPC provided to the Department is sufficient p~ding the inclusion of the above comments Into the NOPC and Amended Development Order. Please feel free I to contact this office at (954) 777-4601 should you have any questIons. ' Sincerely, ~~1y.,.~ ~::icG~E. ct Planning and EnVlfonmentM Engmeer ! GS:mm/al cc: Jim Snyder, TCRPC Bob Romig Gerry O'Reilly John Krane $-.rtANNING\D4llIUIQUANnINI/OOI'CI1UlOC ;.t'.L TOTAL P 03 ., ~l" ~i.\ CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 2001 )' f B Ordinances - 1st Reading 1 Proposed Ordinance No. 01-50 Re Amending Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 1 and Chapter 21, regarding "Banners" (TABLED TO NOVEMBER 20, 2001 A T THE REQUEST OF THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT) 2. Proposed Ordinance No. 01-54 Re Amending the Quantum Park DRIjMaster Plan to change the permitted use on lots 7-11 from "Office Industrial" (01) to "Mixed Use" (MU) and lots 23-31 from "Office" (0) to "Mixed Use" (MU), to increase maximum residential units from 500 units to 1,000 units, to partially close Quantum Lakes Drive and create two (2) new tracts of "Mixed Use" (MU), and to change the permitted use on tract 34-C from "Detention" to "Reserve" C. Resolutions None D Other' XIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS. XIV ADJOURNMENT NOTICE IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE/SHE WIll NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND, FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED (F.S. 286.0105) THE CITY SHAll FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXIUARY AIDS AND SERVICES WHERE NECESSARY TO AFFORD AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE, PROGRAM, OR ACTIVITY CONDUCTED BY THE CITY PLEASE CONTACT JOYCE COSTEllO, (561) 742-6013 AT lEAST TWENTY-FOUR HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY IN ORDER FOR THE CITY TO REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST FINAL AGENDA 10/15/20014:59 PM J'\SHRDATA\CC\WP\CCAGENDA\AGENDAS\YEAR 2001\1 01601.DOC bg 7 Proposed new condltion(s), Quantum Park - NOpe 12 /)enr;/Pc! Oaf-vi/;- (+0 ID J10/6/ FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT AL The proposed Master SIte Development Plan shall be modIfied to remove the IndustrIal use desIgnatIOn for Lot 34-C The land area of Lot 34-C, 6 58 acres, shall be deducted from the IndustrIal desIgnatIon and Included as a separate lIne Item tItled "Reserved" In the area tabulatIOn shown ~~~ master plan. Development shall not occur untIl a) the CItyev1Wuates'lhe need for open space on the project and determInes that the reductIOn In open space created by thIS change IS consIstent WIth the CIty regulatIOns, b) It IS demonstrated that the development of thIS parcel wIll not Interfere wIth management of the adjacent preserve area. These two (2) condItIons are reIterated above and contaIned wIthIn a letter dated October 8, 2001 from the Treasure Coast RegIOnal PlannIng CouncIl (TCRPC) It IS acknowledged that Lot 34-C IS not encumbered by any easement, reservatIOn, dedIcatIOn or permIt reqUIrement by the CIty, any regulatory agency or specIal dIStrICt IncludIng the Quantum Commumty Development DIStrICt regardIng the use of Lot 34-C for draInage purposes, except the draInage reqUIrements assocIated wIth the development of Lot 34-C 10/10/01 Prepared by E. Gerlica EXHIBIT "I" /1;dkfl Mie<J , (/ 10 )U) / D I ~ y~ CondItIOns of Approval .<: /,.e/N PrOject name: Quantum Park NOPC Amendment #12 FIle number' MPMD 01-003/DRlA 01-001 Reference: 2nd review plans IdentIfied as Master Plan wIth a September 11, 2001 Planmng and Zonmg D tdt t kI -, epartmen a e s amp mar ng. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS-General Comments: NONE PUBLIC WORKS-Traffic Comments: 1 When warranted the developer and the eXIstmg occupants of Quantum Park will be responsible for the cost of constructIon of traffic-actuated SIgnals at the mtersectIOns of Quantum Boulevard \'l1th Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue. See attached memo from Jeff LIvergood, Public Works DIrector, dated August 29, 2001/ ReVised October 4,2001 located m ExhibIt "G" UTILITIES Comments: 2 As prevIously stated, the proposed reVISIOn to the land use to "MIxed Use OvID)" to mclude Office, CommercIal and ResIdentlal uses could tax the utility support facilItles to theIr lIrruts. A prOVISO needs to be mcorporated mto each group of lot approvals process, that the desIgn-engmeermg consultant shall demonstrate that suffiCIent UtllIty system(s) capaCIty IS available to support the proposed use, or the} WIll prOVIde the necessary upgrade(s) to allow for the proposed use. Failure to do so could result m msufficIent utilIty support to thIS park, affectmg other current (exIstmg) users. FIRE Comments. NONE I POLICE I I I I Comments: NONE I i ENGINEERING DIVISION I ! I I Comments: NONE :1 I 2 10/5/2001 ~DEPARTMENTS r BUILDING DIVISION Comments: NONE PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 3 i The CIty CommISSIOn dId exempt fr91l1 the RecreatIOn D dIcatIOn ReqUirement of 272 umts ofthe~umt~reqUlre.9:m ~~ Hl.8St rccefl zn~plart)_ri~veroperard pledge, however, to proVIde -- appropnate pubhc reCreation facihties for these umts. (To be determmed m conJunction With the Parks DIVI.sion.) If addItional umts are approved and If applicable, at a mImmum the d'eveloper IS reqUired to prOVIde: 1,000 unIts-272'til1lts = 728 D U 728 D U.x.015 a~es = 1092 acres aSSUmIng Y2 credIt'for pnvate recreatIon =5 46 acres assumIng ~ credIt fo natural reserve = 2.73 acres ConsIdenng the unpact of the on_ al 272 umts, thIS 2.73 acres should be hIgher (3 75 acres), dependmg on at:> ements WIth the CIty Natural resource credIt, If approved by the co IssIOn, IS subtracted off the RecreatIon DedIcatIOn reqUIrement. Ac~rdmg to Chapter 1, ArtIcle V, SectIOn 3, of the Land Development Regu~tIOns, the developer must proVIqt five (5) park ele~ order to q1lahfy for:..~l(~~~t forEpnvate recrdltIOn proy!~dapplicabIhty for amount of Recreation Fees or DedicatIOns will be conSIdered at subsequent SIte plan stag~~__ __ ".~~~.._..... v. '"'_ "",,"",_ i ;r FORESTERJENVIRONMENT ALIST .. Comments: Lot 34-C IS shown on the Quantum Park Master Plan as a 6.58-acre detention (open space) area and IS contiguous to the 25 7-acre Sand Pme Preserve. The proposed land use change of lot 34-C from "detentIOn" (open space) to "mdustnal", could affect the envIronmental quahtyofthe contiguous Sand Pme Preserve when the mdustnal tract IS sold and developed by the future owner, and IS therefore not supported by staff .,..---- 5 D 0 #84-51 SectIon 4 Item # 11 page 6 ReqUires the removal of all Melaleuca, Brazihan Pepper & Austrahan Pme trees from the site. There are numerous trees of this descnpnon on the lot 34-C that should be removed by the apphcant. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 6 At the time of site plan approval applIcant \VIll work. with the CIty to / INCLUDE REJECT ._ .~-::. ~.v_ ~-.3; (hM x ,/ ../" ./' 3 10/5/2001 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT maxumze emergency access for lots 59 through 61 and new lots 100 through 102. 7 ApplIcant has subrmtted a reVIsed area calculatIOn summary Please reVIse the Master Plan draWing to reflect the correct acreage calculations proposed for the Mixed Use and Road RIght-ofWay categones. ~The Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISIOn has reVIewed the traffic study and f(e~~ emed approval due to the follOWing: a) The traffic generated by the hIgh school (about 2,283 daily trIps) should b be counted as vested trIps WIthm the overall Quantum development ref1 traffic generations. b) Daily and peak hour trips related to "ADA Approvals" as presented in Attachments lA. IB and lC. must reflect the values of the latest NOPC approval. (Ref. Letter from Masoud Atefi, Palm Beach County to Michael Rumpf dated 8/20/01) Please respond to these comments, revise the traffic study accordmgly and obtam necessary approval from Palm Beach County ADDmONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDmONS Comments: ADDmONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: / ~; ~ ~ S:\PlanninglSHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\QuantumPark 2001 Amen # 12\\1PMD 0 1 ~03\c(l'\d. of approval 2001 fonn.doc \rJfjl /i ~( "11" ~, - rh., :...., , /!.- f J..- i- II \ I '-/ (J~ I ~ ) h 11', ./ n-..... ' 1--. /~_ fLf2 ~4 I j) / '/11 ;/11:; ~ ,/(/tYl' v~ y i.-~ L / - Monct(f 10 OS 01 ,.01\ 15 01 FAX 561 i40 2429 Qr.-\~Ttr~( IiJ 001 002 ~~. QUANTU/V\ .::m~ c" 0 Uf>O F COM PI\ N I E S oet8'l'O ~.. FACSIMILE TO' ~ & C5A.l.-M. COMPANY fAXNUMiJER. q \ ...14l"~774 ~) - FROM. Eugene Gerlica DATE. \O/~/2JDf)\ NUMBER OF PAGES. ""'2... with cover Remarks: 2500 Qua~lun'llak8S Dri\le. Suite 101 Boyntol1 Beach. FL 33426 (5611740-2447 . ~ax: :561: 741).2429 (I-mail: [JU3nlgrJ1Cqgc.cc ~ 10/08/01 MON 15 02 FAX 561 740 2429 Qt:ANTlHl Proposed new condItion. NOpe 12 , ocr - L. .. The proposed Master Site Development Plan shall be modlfied to remove the Industrial use deslgnahon for Lot 34-C The land area of Lot 34-C, 6 58 acres, shall be deducted from the Industnal deSignatIon and Included as a separate line Item btled ULot-34C" In the area tabulation shown on the master plan. Lot 34-C shall remain'~_lb.., undesignated for a specific use. Development shall not occur until a) the City evaluates the need tor open space on the project and determines that the reduction in open space created by this change is consistent with the CIty regulations; b) it is demonstrated that the development of this parcel will not interfere with management of the adjacent preserve area. These two (2) conditions are reiterated above and contamed withm a letter dated October 8,2001 from the Treasure Coast RegIonal Planning CouncIl (TCRPC). I Fu1)hennore, the City shall n9t unr. easonably wilhhold such det.ernunat.IODs ~ ~hal1 cooperated in good faIth in addr~$smg the TCRPC ;.gncems /' T~~ding/the development of Lot 34-C ...r ,,/ --- -' i' It IS acknowledged that Lot 34-C 15 not encumbered by any easement) reservatlon, dedicatIon or permIt requirement by the City, any regulatory agency or specIal district mcluding the Quantum Community Development DIstrIct regarding the use of Lot 34-C for dramage purposes, except the drainage requirements assocIated with the development of Lot 34-C. ~ , .... I _,I' i- J - . -' -I .;1' 1 0/8/01 Prepared by E. Gcrlica IlJ002 002 I ' i"'~Il/,)J;1 ~- ,.....- ~ 7-- /J If ) 1~ I I , / r iJ.,J !.i' -' ( .1 st REVIEW COIVIMENTS l\laster Plan lVlodification '-.':"-<"'::'j A L.J ProJect name: Quantum Park FIle number:MPMD 01-003 Reference' 151 reVlew plans Identified as Master Plan ModlficatlOn. File 01-003 WIth an August 14. 2001 Planmng and Zonmg Department date stamp marking. , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT I PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: None PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: See attached memo from Jeff LIvergood, Pubhc Works DIrector dated August 29,2001 UTILITIES Comments: 1 Lots 7 thru 11, and Lots 23 thru 31, located on Quantum Boulevard (a total of 14 lots) were the subJect of Quantum Park Amendment #11 cu ... (MPMD 00-007) to whlch we responded to m UtihtIes Department p.:-f" D~ Memorandum #01-012, dated January 11, 2001 To recapltulate those comments, we stated that With the ongInal DR! for the total park deslgned for CommercIal, Industnal, Office, or a combmatlOn of Office and Industnal, and/or Office, Industnal and CommercIal, both the water and wastewater systems to support these type of uses was deSIgned and constructed for those antIcIpated uses. Four (4) hft statlOns were configured to handle the wastewater generatlOn antiCIpated m the 550 acre park. 2. As prevlOusly stated, the proposed reVISlOn to the land use to "MIxed Use (MU)" to mclude Office, CommercIal and ReSIdentIal uses could tax the utihty support facihtIes to theIr lumts. A proVISO needs to be mcorporated It--l mto each group of lot approvals process, that the deSIgn engIneenng t~I DiL consultant shall demonstrate that suffiCIent utIhty system(s) capacIty IS available to support the proposed use, or they will prOVIde the necessary upgrade(s) to allow for the proposed use. Failure to do so could result m msufficIent utihty support to thIS park, affectmg other current (exIstmg) users. 3 Apphcant IS requestmg that Lot 34-C be converted to Industnal usage, In 1'-' heu that Lot 34-C was open space deSIgnated for dry retentlOn (as an overflow from Tract "J"), apphcant IS reqUIred to demonstrate that the dry pGr~ retention area of thIS lot IS no longer needed, or to whIch lot/tract dId the dry M.tl LGt retention reqUIrement get transferred. The partIal letter from SFWMD nt.{tf. (It; piC 4 "r P:Yf)1rl-0 /Ij (unSIgned) does not mdIcate that the dry retention of Lot 34-C IS no longer UW'?j 01'\4 .to pm I f.?(! ,J:"" reqUIred, nor has the "As-Built Master Dramage Plan from the engmeer-of- record Rossi and Malavasi Engmeers, Inc , ever been submItted to the CIty ~~D) MPMD 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/1 % 1 2 . D EP..<\R TMEN"TS INCLUDE REJECT It WIll be reqUired to subrmt the back-up documentatIOn to substantIate that the applicant's request for land use converSIOn. 4 ThIS lot IS also at the low pomt along Miner Road WhICh has roadway dramage structures and the dIscharge mto Lot 34-C The applicant does not =t.LT mdIcate how he plans to treat thIS roadway dramage, both for the current per OiL two-lane roadway sectIOn and the ultImate four-lane dIVIded roadway sectIOn. 5 Quantum Lakes Dnve, from Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard, contams both water and wastewater system segments, to whIch at least one- eLl', half of the dedIcated milit-of-wav will be reqUired to be utilIty easement( s). pc..r D iL- No antICIpated permanent "park amemtIes" will be penrutted on the utilIty easement(s), other than soddmg and/or SIdewalk. ThIS department will reqUIre demonstratIOn that "neglIgible Impacts on the traffic dIstributIOn resultmg from the roadway reconfiguratIOn" Subrmtted traffic analYSIS by the consultant does not meet DRI traffic performance standards. pu;t l?o...clL- In ciurrrc1 '?i.k:. jJUdl r.(\iIt:W (u:Hlt-h.f rdClM r k 'I~\ , FIRE Comments: o t.CT 6 Roads and hydrants must be m place pnor to any constructIOn above grade. f-lCr /Z.1::- POLICE Comments: None - ENGINEERING DMSION Comments: 7 Abandonment of a portIon of Quantum Lake Dnve will reqUIre replattmg of CUI that portIOn of Quantum Park m accordance WIth the reqUirements of the f-U'" LDR. Chapter 5 Plattml!, ~ u....- p~ c.....f rr lZeC (D .- \Ze" i t:-O~'\I iT A C1AH..~"5T'm i?J CC;:1H(M6t-fT .u 8 Lot 34C (NotificatIon of a Proposed Chanl!e, SectIon 5 4) IS proposed to be changed from undesIgnated use to Industnal use. How will thIS change fO-I..l- Impact proposed open spaces and park areas WIthm the development? 9 PrOVIde venficatlOn that Palm Beach County Engmeenng will penrut a 6VLT dnveway opemng onto Miner Road for Lot 34C. Show how a second mgress and egress pomt will be prOVIded at the south end of the property for emergency serVIces. 10 If approved, an enVIronmental assessment of Tract 34C WIll be reqUIred as <SUT MPMD I ST REVIEW COMMEl\TTS 09/10/01 3 DEP ARTMENTS part of any sIte submIttal. 11 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve will Isolate the dedIcated roadway easement along the north property lme of Lot 61 The NotIficatIOn of a Proposed Chanl!e, SectIOn 5.5, mdIcates access 'Will be proVIded VIa a smgle entrance pomt at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Quantum Boulevard, ElIrmnatIOn of that portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and the second access pomt will create an undeSIrably long tnp for the most northerly reSIdents of the proposed multI-family reSIdentIal development and would create a hazardous SItuatIOn for emergency serVIces needmg to access northerlv portIOns of that same development. 12. Abandonment of a portIon of Quantum Lake Dnve and reconfigunng a portIOn of It mto Lot 101 will create an undeSIrably long tnp for the most northerly tenants of the proposed new lot and will create a hazardous SItuatIOn for emergency serVIces needmg to access northerly portIons of that same development. 13 ReconfiguratIon of Lots 62 and 63 mto a smgle Lot 102 would create the same SItuatIOn described m the above Paragraphs 2 and 3 for the southerly tenants of the proposed new lot. 14 The NotIficatIOn of a Proposed Chanl!e, SectIOn 5.5, paragraph 3, represents the mtersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Gateway Boulevard as substandard and dangerous. TIns mtersectIOn has preVIously been reVIewed and approved. Please prOVIde addItIonal mformatIOn (aCCIdent data and standard draWings) supportmg thIS statement. 15 If the areas MUI0l and Lot 34C are new, developable parcels then an addItIonal recreatIOnal fee (or land m lIeu of fee) may be assessed based on the ongInal calculatIOns for the CIty park. 16 The creatIOn of Lots 100 and 101 and the re-desIgnatIOn of Lot 34C from undesIgnated to Industnal will obVIously mcrease traffic volumes. The Traffic AnalYSIS (Quantum Park NOPC #12) states that" will not result m an mcrease m daily or peak hour volumes" Although the analYSIS concludes that there are no mcreases m the approved daily and peak hour tnps due to SImultaneous mcreases and decreases m allowable development mtensItIes, the analYSIS needs to further address local changes m traffic volumes that would result from the proposed changes, 17 The Traffic AnalYSIS (Quantum Park NOPC #12) aclmowledges that the closure of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve has the potentIal to Impact the regional roadway network. The analYSIS further states that dIverted traffic will cause the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard to operate over capaCIty dunng the PM peak hour The analYSIS proposes changes m strIpmg and roadway WIdemng to address thIS WIthout proVIdmg a timetable. Please be more speCIfic as to how and when thIS work WIll be mcoroorated mto the plannmg process to mimmize imoact to the travelmg INCUJDE REJECT I~ r-rLL I~ p::;r LL it-.l pc.f"(....L. ~L6 ;"\ I { <.:J-t-J ..."J. I \..J _ ':::i - . , c;~ ~ :- ~ ':. :rj~ ~~ IJ T ~ I- ~ ~ 1.. ',I ).;) ::r ..J ,,~ i- i- ~ ~':-;D9 T' ~ \ ....!'-' . - E /'\ "'cl1"f" "':1 ~ e ;: .J 5 ;:...<~r: .J .. 4.. Yv ~ ~" ~ 'J -, J ,.~ -..J-:Z .j'UjJ.J ,.... '~....<. \j .~ J't.../ ; ~ Q/JClWl O~T per- u.- :{ () ..... C " C- , -" -<.. >S ..) .J ~ ~ c~ u-r ~fZ- J U ~lU'f'CD jA-BU> Qil4iol dlT [7Bl2- i1\-~L'6 J W - r D CVt4/ol MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/1 % 1 4 , . DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT pubhc. Also please address the Impact these proposed changes would have on access by emergency vehIcles and law enforcement. 18 Identify the tract shown as MUI0l as MU60A and MU61A to show each lot's addItional property due to the abandonment. Change MUI00 to OlLT MUI02A. fXr u.- BUILDING DIVISION Comments: None P ARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 19 The City COmmISSIOn dId exempt, from the RecreatIOn DedIcatIOn ReqUirement, 272 umts of the 1,000 umts reqUired m the most recent master plan reVISIOn. The developer dId pledge, however, to prOVIde appropnate pubhc recreation facihtIes for these umts, (To be deterrmned In conJunction WIth the Parks DlVlsIOn,) The total recreatIOn dedIcatIOn reqUirement will be calculated as follows. 1,000 umts-272 umts=728 D U 728 D U.X 015 =10.92 acres Y:z credIt may be given agamst the reqUirement of land dedIcatIOn or payment of fees. Y2 pnvate recreation credIt \"ill be calculated as follows, 10.92 acres / 2=546 acres An addItional ~ credIt may be gIVen for natural resources agamst the reqUirement of land dedIcatIOn or payment of fees. ~ credIt for natural resources will be calculated as follows. 10.92 acres/ 4 = 273 acres The developer may want to conSIder dedIcatIOn of the land, or a combmatIOn of dedIcation and fee 20 Natural resource credIt, If approved by the commISSIOn, IS subtracted off the RecreatIon DedIcatIOn ReqUirement. 21 Accordmg to Chapter 1, ArtIcle V Section 3 of the Land Development RegulatIOn, the developer must prOVIde 5 park elements In order to quahfy for Y:z credIt for pnvate recreatIOn prOVided. ~. '" .~..!<;(" . ~~t.~:- ~ ;. ~l:l~~~~ .~ '1~~{gt ",...~' ............................~~.................................~.................*............ SOUT~ '\tORIDA WATER MANAGEMENt....,"llSTRICT MODIFICATION OF SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT NO 50-01503-S ................................................................................................. DATE ISSUED. Ma rch 10, 1988 ISSUED TO Boynton Park of COfTIllerce, Inc (Boynton Beach Park of Commerce aka Quantum Park) 2455 E Sunrise Blvd, Suite 1106 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304 LOCATION Pa 1m Bea~h COUNTY 455 RGE~_ SEC 16,17,20,21 TWP ORIGINAl PERMIT Al'THORIZATlON (Conceptual Approval granted October 8, 1986 ) CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SEPVING 119 ACRES OF INDUSTRIAL LANDS (55 ACRES OF LAKE AND 64 ACRES OF ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY) DISCHARGING VIA LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT'S E-4 INTO C-16 AP 'HOVED MODIFICA liON REDUCE PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED LAKE AREA FK2~ 55 ACRES TO 54 8 ACRES AND ~EDUCE ROAD RIG~TS-OF-WAY .FROM 64 ACRES TO 60 5 ACRES, TOTALLING 115 3 ACRES, DIS- CHARGING VIA LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT'S E-4 INTO C-16 (App No 11207-F) THlfol PER...I r ~ODI' IC A TION IS APPROVED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST DATED Nav 2tl.19 87 PERMITEE AGREES TO "OLD AND SAllE THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND ITS SUCCESSORS HARMLESS FRO'" "~Y AND ALL DAM~GES. ClAIMS. OR UABlUTlES WHICH MAY ARISE BY REASON OF THE CONSTRUCTION. OPERATION. MAINTENANCE. OR USE OF ANV WORK OR STRUCTURE INVOLVED IN THE PERMIT THE ORIGINAL PER~IT INClL:DI~G ALL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ATTACHED THERETO. AS ADDRESSED BY THE STAFF REPo?r AND THOSE ADDRESSED BY THE MODIFICATION STAFF REPORT ARE BY REFERENCE MADE" PART HEREOF All SPECIFIO\TIO~S. SPECIAL AND LIMITING CONDiTIONS ATTENDANT TO THE ORIGINAL PERMIT l:""ILESS SPECIFICAUY RECINDED BY nus OR PREVIOUS MODIFICATIONS. REMAIN IN EFFECT SPECIAL CONDITIONS SEE SHEETS 2, 3 AND 4 CF 5 - 19 PROJECT SPECIAL CONDITIONS SEE SHEET 5 OF 5 - 12 LIMITING CONDITIONS ORIGINAL PERMIT ISSUED- December 11, 1985 ":.-1.~.'''~'' ~."""",'''*,"",.''It , r , '7, !#::~ 1 . . _ . . _ ~~~~~-.. I.?"~fi.i '.."" i~~:':"~. .;r~~; tf ~:;';""" r'<.... 1: . .~ .... .:. .~. ;;,~: '~i ',..' / 1- I-~. ';;" 4, !I,.<.,,~;.j-~<l'!.l A ",,,,,,~'-l: ~q. %"'~~~ " Mt'nnit (~:OD) "io 50-01503-5 ,f aLl rch 10, 1988 . Sheet 2 of 5 rf ~' SPECIAL ~ONOITIONS i MINIMUM BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATION 14 0 FEET NGVD 2 MINIMUM ROAD CROWN ELEVATION 12 0 FEET NGVD 3 DISCHARGE FACILITIES DESCRIPTION 2-CONTROL STRUCTURES EACH CONSISTING OF 1-1 35' X 4 24' INVERTED TRIANGLE BLEEDER WITH AN INVERT AT ELEVATION 8 0 FEET NGVD AND A SCREW GATE AS PER L W D D REQUEST BOTH STRUCTURES ARE ATTACHED TO A 42- DIAMETER CULVERT WITH VARYING LENGTHS RECEIVING WATER S F W H D C-I6 CANAL VIA L W D D E-4 CANAL flo. .. ~ -,~~' (',. ~ '::_~" !.l t"".Ll~..., I. ."" . .....~;. :~ l~ $~'1 t ~~1ft CONTROL ELEVATION B 0 FEET NGVD 4 THE PERMITTEE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CORRECTION OF ANY EROSION OR SHOALING PROBLEHS THAT RESULT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION OF THE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 5 MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENTATION AND/OR TURBIDITY PROBLEHS ARE NOT CREATED IN THE RECEIVING WATER 6 THE PERMITTEE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CORRECTION OF ANY WATER QUALITY PROBLEMS THAT RESULT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION OF THE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 7 THE DISTRICT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE THAT WATER QUALITY TREATMENT METHODS BE INCORPORATED INTO TliE DRAINAGE SYSTEM IF SUCH MEASURES ARE SHOWN TO BE NECESSARY 8 OPERATION OF THE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF QUM~TUM PARK OF BOYNTON BEACH PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION 9 THE PERMITTEE SHALL PROVIDE TO THIS DISTRICT DOCUMENTATION OF LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT APPROV~' PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION 10 LAKE SIDE SLOPES SHALL BE 4 1 (HORIZONTAL VERTICAL) TO A DEPTH OF TWO FEET E~LOW THE CONTROL ELEVATION SIDE SLOPES SHALL BE NURTURED OR PLANTED FROM 2 FEET BELOW TO 1 Foor ABOVE CONTROL ELEVATION TO INSURE VEGETATIVE GROWTH 11 PRIOR TO THE INITIATION OF ANY WITHDRAWA! OF WATER (IRRIGATION, DEWATERING, PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY, ETC ), IT WILL BE NEC~5SARY TO APPLY FOR A WATER USE PERMIT THE PERMITTEE IS CAUTIONED THAT A MINIMUM OF 90 DAYS IS REQUIRED FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE WATER USE PERMIT APPLICATION THE PE~~ITTEE T~ ~ CAUTIONED THAT THE ISSUANCE OF A SURFACE WATER HANAGEHENT PERMIT SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO BE A GUARANTEE THAT WATER WILL BE AVAILABLE I t:ij.. ;f '-~t: !,)~,;.c" :, ~. I ~.:.~.~:.~ ~:-t 'Y;>o't' :~~~ . ~~~ 'i,~g ....~," 'j ~~;, -r ~ j-, :~ . "l~._:;i~; ~'~tf~ / '~~~~f . . '."', ~:r. t,...-~ ~~] i~;.. 0:1;~ -:.;> \f.{ -/ .:, -, "l';i d. o ot;r.~'7- ....~. ..r/-' [ -,~,,,,-,,:,:,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,~,"" .(;~-... ....... .~___.u_J.h_ ,...;i-t_ .oS,~-N;~;~~,jfM~N~~~~ 1 r-- J' ;"'!;.~",""" ""'.7!'~' ~'<~);~"~ . ~J.t.... ._,.c..I1>.-~..., ~_ ...\. or. '!-',:.:. .-,. 'f ~ -, ~ ..: ....... . 50-01503-5 if f'i ~ ~. [ ~ ~~.""'" ,. . ..~;;f, .~:tij .~~'~.:~! - _.~ ~.:-.. ~ ,-"ermi t (1'100) No f"-'l.;lrch la, 1988 Sheet 3 of 5 12 PRIOR TO THE CO~MENCEMEtjT OF CONSTRUCTION OF FUTURE PHASES, PAVING GRAOING AND DRAINAGE PlAN~ SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DISTRICT FOR REVIEV AND APPROVAL 13 DISCHARGE STRUCTURES TO lAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT SYSTEMS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EMERGENCY SCREW GATES SATISFACTORY TO lAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT GATES SHALL BE PERMANENTLY SECURED IN A CLOSED POSITION BY METHODS SATISFACTORY TO LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT EMERGENCY SCREW GATES SHALL ONLY BE OPERATED WITH PRIOR APPROVAL FROM lAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT 14 15 PERIMETER SITE GRADING SHALL BE AT OR ABOVE ELEVATION 13 4 FEET NGVD THE PERMITTEE SHAll FILE DEED RESTRICTION IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY, REQUIRING THAT INDIVIDUAL ORAINAGE FACILITIES OEVELOPED BY OWNERS OF lOTS, WITHIN THE AREA COVERED BY THIS PERMIT, SHALL CONFORM TO THE MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN APPROVED HEREIN AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE~OUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PROOF OF RECORDATION MUST BE SUBMITTED TO DISTRICT STAFF PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION INDIVIDUAL TRACTS SHALL PROVIDE A 1/2- OF DRY PRETREATMENT PRIOR TO DISCHARGING INTO THE MASTER SYSTEM IN ORDER TO SATISFY CONDITION NO 12 OF THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER THE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE FOR THE LOTS WITHIN THIS PROJECT SHALL BE 75 PERCENT IF ANY lOTS EXCEED THIS PEkCENTAGE, ADDITIONAL WATER QUALITY TREATMENT WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE PROPOSED CHANGES WILL BE CONSIDERED A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION FROM THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL SUBMITTAL, THE PERMITTEE SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION TO THIS DISTRICT VERIFYING ALL REGULATORY AGENCIES HAVING J"~TSOICTION APPROVE THE PROPOSED DESIGN WATER QUALITY SAMPLES SHALL BE TAKEN AT THE DISCHARGE LOCATIONS OF THE WATErt MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DURING PERIODS OF DISCHARGE FLOW SHALL BE MEASURED AT THE TIME OF SAMPLE COLLECTION AND THE SURFACE ELEVATION OF THE WATER BODY SHALL BE PROVIDED A LABORATORY CERTIFIED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WATER QUALITY SAMPLING AND ANALYSES REyORTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THIS DISTRICT NO LATER THAN SIX HONTBS FOLLOWING THE ISS~ANCE OF THIS PERMIT MONITORING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE EVALUATED BY THIS DISTRICT FOLLOWING TWO YEARS OF DATA COLLECTION 16 17 18 19 MONITORING TYPE AND SCHEDULE PARAMETERS 1 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON, OISSOLVEO OXYGEN, pH, TURBIDITY, SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE. CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND AND ALKALINITY - GENERAL (BI-MONTHlY) ....~-....._.oCIIl.;_. -......-...,.G~;.J..~ii4:~.rst:'.. .' .... .,,'i -1..\;:..: :~ """ ,."" < '.. i-:~.;-j.~~i - ;--:::"~.;- ~~;:'I ... ..... ,~~~ "7! ~. .[ 1, :~) /li ./1 ..i ~-'lo" . l . h. '. .o{-'~ . $[%: '-r" ".; tt~; .g~:; . I,.L ~~-~~ .Jf.~~<>~ -Y~;::'~1~V:i /~~.%~ './ -- .~ :J-.){ -"~.h~ "!<';:,i. 1 I ,'j ~ J ~ ;, ~: .~~ -}~ -~~ ~ ~t' ',~l -I J.t 'Jill 'y. " ~ ,;i "..,.. 2 ORGANICS (SEMI-ANNUAL) 3 METALS-ClASS III (SEMI-ANNUAL) I: ; -1 ~ I \l ;1 , , 1 1 i I f ~~J,r' "..,......-- I~ .. ' ;.w-! "'~~ ., - ," .~~..w!H~fJ - i" '-". ~:~/~ _..p' o AI. ermit (NOD) No '-'arch 10, 1:138 Sheet 4 of :; TRICHLOROETHYLENE, TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, C~ReON TETRACHLORIDE, VINYL CHLORIDE, 1,1,1- TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE, BENZENE, ETHYLENE rIBROHIDE ALUMINUM, ANTIMONY, BERYLLIUM, CADMIUM. COPPER CYANIDE, IRON, LEAD, MERCURY, NICKEL, SELENIU~I SILVER AND ZINC +- -~.~......,. . _ i...l.~ _'-'~"t~l 1 ~ .11 III 11\""1 NP if f ~ . _ J I'm IV."'- '..::r,,: ~~~~~~. t~;;;;~~~!li{'~ 50-01503-5 .t......""';..:., ..,,'^ ,- :..t:~{~~~iA~'~3~~"~ ~}: ~~t~,~~~~\~:---~!-.. k1" I.. :':iF:.' i"~IIJ' .,';":.!ii.. ~~' (-;),i?;'<ft \ ~, . i";{: .~ ;.l;,;:;c, ,'1;~1tf ~,:~p., W'~\ ~ t;;.~~?t'4-~;t-~ /" i~~ .~!.;; ~ "'~rmit (':()j)) 'iLl <;O-015U)-~ .ardl 10, jqag Sl1 et 5 ul :: ~~ 'j I ~ .. t. LIMIT:tl,~ CONDITIONS ....,.. F.~"'..t - ~ S~t.. pn':SE LT::: HE: ..;: ..\UT...::H'~ Z~J IN A '.~I"~"'JE' S:) AS TO.I .....1..:.:. -:'~: ,'P ")....=. J;'."":: J'" LDl.lfE ,,"'T..;A':'L E' IA")t. .'E"'T'~L ."'LUES ;'N") ......TEil __.:.~ - ,... P;':,1"" iTEE '" 1_.... .. - :"t: r::!:.>5A~'" .'f ~.. ilEe: ~....h ~G r'HE r:Ol\;ST~......::jIC&~ PE~':.J "l':...= .:; t-....... CJ.I~"'CTl:J ;)f':'Nvf '-_ Ei1~,-p,-"rEC.Hl':;:;' J"e ~~INS''''.LED;;-RUCTURES .JRE::J;:"E"':.2'" T ~IH: tTY ..,,; ~R "47 :..v~: .G AN:> SE:; ME'-t A. TION IN THE RECEIVING ,."'A iEHS. .. , 2 \'...T ;:; ~UALITY ::AU F,::A THE \'wUrR D:::;:;HAAGEO FRO'JI THE PERM rrEE~ PAOPER-Y OR !I,-J S_:: .:.':E WAHASOFTHE..,\TF. "';'L_BESU8MI~TEJTOTHEOIST;:; CTASAEOUiRE~ IOAAAME,E;<STOElE ~Oll; -::.4E: '.l.l.Y '. UOE T,.,03E L S EJ IN CHAPTeR' J IF \ ;.-EA OUALI-Y 0"'-", IS AE=lJIREO T"'E PI:RwnEE ~"'':'~L ~H;)V "lE DA T AS hE8 Hi:) (;'1 'OLJ 'E5 OF W':' TE"l O:SCHARGEO INCL... :l'NG TOTAL \ OLUME :: ~::....:.:: :;E" ;)l"R ~ - -...;: DAY') Ci'" S':' .1~L,N:3 ~:'o,::: TG TAL ,\':>:\07>1,- Y D.SCtiARGES FI;OM ,tiE PROPE:: -Y OR r-. -0 ~y:: ...CE W.l.~E.<:; JF -II: ST.l.':"E " ~.:-.~~. ~ ,1 .~..-,.;. 3 THE PER..lITTEE S....AU CO'.,?~'! WITH ALL A;>PLICABLE LOCAL SUBDiVISION REGuLATIO~S AND OTHE~ ~::::::;.~ ..EOUIRt .oE",rs :!II A.J:JiTlO:J TH~ PE~MI-TEE S....A__ OeTAIN ALL NECESSARY FEDERAL. STATE. LCC':'~ ","'::l S?ECIAL JISTR.C- AUTHCRiZA nONS PRIOR TO TtiE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION OR AL ':"ERA TIC~ OF ::At<S A,-,THOAI_ED BY -HIS PERMIT I , , ?' I ~~i:~f~ ~ ... i."i.. ~ J : ~aff; ["'1, '.''',,-':::l<-c,! I .. ! "~~1 .1 ~ ~fitj r t ~f.1 ;', ~ ::f~1' liJ!; . ,if, 4 it-E OPE;;...T 0 P....ASE OF -H S PERrAIT SI-ALL NOT BECOME: EFFECTIVE UNTiLA F~O)RIDA I'lEGIS7E~E::l rROFES')'y'_AL E"::;,:,EE~ CE:;TIFIES THAT A~L FAC1:..'T.ES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED 1:'11 ,o.::;:::ORJ.:./I;::E ..1'.... TME OESiG:J "'P"~Ov:::l BY THE D:S,RICT W THIN 30 DAYS AFTER COM?L.ETION OF CO~ :;TRUCTlON ::.,. THE SURFACE.OJ ,EM 'JA:3E....!;'JT SYSil;.M -HE PERMITTEE SHALL SUBMIT THE CERTIFICA i,ON AND Nor ;:Y THE l.J STRICT T AT '" FACILIT1ES ARE REA:)Y FOR INSPECTION AND APPROVAL UPO'll APPROVAL CO: THE CCMPLETEC S ". kCE ,VA,ER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. THE PERMITTEE SHALLREOl E5T TAANfFER:::;: THE ?ERMIT TO THE hESPONSIBLE ENTITY APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT 5 ALL ROAOS SH..LL ElE SET AT OR ABOVE ELEVATIONS REOUIRED BY THE APPLICABL.E LOCAL GOVERNMEN- F _:'0:> CR..TERIA B AU. eUILDING F.:JORS SHALL. BE SET AT 0::1 ABOVE ELEVATIONS ACCE?TABLE TO. THE APPLICAaLE L::::::A_ GOVERNMENT 7 OFf-SITE DISCHARGES OUI':ING CONSTF:UCT/ON AND DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE MADE ONLY THROUG'" THE FACIL.ITlES AUTHORIZED BY THIS PERM:T NO ROADWAY OR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SHALL COM'., E'ICE ON-SITE UNnL COMPLE,ION OF THE PERMITTED D.SCHARGE STRUCTURE AND OETE~TlON AREAS .:. -e;l DISCHARGED FROM 'l'HE PilOJECT SHALL BE THAOUGH STRUCTURES HAVING A MECHANISM SUITAB:..E F.J~ RE:'ULATlNG U:>STRE;'M WATER STAGES. SiAGES MAY BE SUBJECTTO OPERATING SC;HEO~LES SATISF,o.C,ORY TO THE OISTRlcr -~. c) NO CONSTnUCTION AUTHORIZEO HEREIN SHALL COI.AMENCE UNTIL A RESPONS!BLE ENTITY ACCEPT ABLE TO ~HE DISTRICT HAS eEEN ESTABLISHED AND HASAQREED TO OPERATE AND MI.I~~T A!N THE SYSTEM. THE ENTITY M:;ST BE PROVIDED WITH SUFFICIENT ()WNERSHI? SO THAT IT HAS CONTROL OVER ALL WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES AUTHORIZED HEREIN UPON RECEIPT OF WRITTEN EVIDENCE OF THE SAT SFACTlON OF TH S CONDITION. THE DISTAICT WILL ISSUE AN AUTHORIZATION TO COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION. 9 T"'lE PERMIT DOES NOT CONVEY TO THE PEAMIITEE ANY PROPERTY RIGHT NOR ANY RIGHTS OR PRIV LEQE": OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT AND CHAPTER .OE". FAC. 10 THE PERMITTEE SHALL HOLD AllIe SAVE THE DIST~ICT HARMLESS FROM ANY AND All DAMAGES. CLAI ~S, OM LIA8ILITIE~ WHICH MAY ARISE BY REASON OF THE CONSTRUCTION. OPERATION, MAINTENANCE OR USE OF ANY FACIL.ITY AuTHORIZED BY THE PERMIT 11 THIS PERMIT IS ISSIJEO BASEO ON THE APPLICANT'S SUBMITTED INFORMATION WHICH REASONABLY DEMONSTRATES THAT ADVERSE OFF-SITE WATER RESOURce RELATED IMPACTS WILL NOT BE CAUSED CY THE COMPLETED PEAMIT ACTIVITY IT IS ALSO THE REcSPONSl81LITY OF THE PERMIITEE TO INSURE THAT A::l,..ERSE OFF-SITE WATER RESOURCE RELATED IMPACTS DO NOT OCCUR DURINQ CO~STRUCTION, 12 PRIOR TO DE,^I'.TEF1!II,;O. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMIITED TO Tl-tE DISTRICT FC~ APPROVAL. INFORMATION SHALL INCLUDE AS A MINIMIJM PUMP SiZES. LOCATIONS AND HOURS OF OPERATION FOR EACH PU'-'P IF O"F ~:rE DISCHARGE IS PR:JPOSED. OR OFF-SITE ADVERSE IMPACTS ARE EVIDENT.AN INDIVIDUAL WATER USE PER.....'T 'JIAY BE REOUIRED THE PERMITTEE IS CAUTIONED THAT SEVERAL MONTHS MAY BE REOUIRED FOR CONSIDERA TION OF THE W..TEA USE PEAMIT APPLICATION. r.it .. ~~. t~~'f ~t.'~~,.<.\ I"::. ~:f'~~ t:~~~\~ r i' t;t~ ,. it. ..:} ~~fj "..~: J / .. "~..u:'-~'V....., r r \ I I t ,,,,-,"""""""'~"""~":o....<;o;.a<-';-"'<l1>:".~~-~.~. 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS Master Plan Modification LObj A lj ProJect name: Quantum Park File number MPMD 01-003 Reference' 1 sl reVIew plans IdentIfied as Master Plan ModIficatIOn. File 01-003 wIth an August 14. 2001 Plannmg and Zomng Department date stamp marking, , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments. None PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: See attached memo from Jeff LIvergood, PublIc Works DIrector dated August 29, 2001 UTILITIES Comments: 1 Lots 7 thru 11, and Lots 23 thru 31, located on Quantum Boulevard (a total of 14 lots) were the subJect of Quantum Park Amendment #11 C!Ul (MPMD 00-007) to whIch we responded to m UtilIties Department p<r DK- Memorandum #01-012, dated January 11, 2001 To recapItulate those comments, we stated that With the ongInal DR! for the total park deSIgned for CommerCIal, IndustrIal, Office, or a combmatIOn of Office and IndustrIal, and/or Office, IndustrIal and Commercial, both the water and wastewater systems to support these type of uses was deSIgned and constructed for those antiCIpated uses. Four (4) 11ft stations were configured to handle the wastewater generatIon antiCIpated m the 550 acre park. 2 As prevIOusly stated, the proposed reVISIOn to the land use to "MIxed Use (MU)" to mclude Office, CommerCIal and ReSIdential uses could tax the utilIty support facilItIes to theIr lImIts. A prOVISO needs to be mcorporated I.... mto each group of lot approvals process, that the deSIgn engIneenng ~fDiL consultant shall demonstrate that suffiCIent utilIty system(s) capaCIty IS available to support the proposed use, or they will prOVIde the necessary upgrade(s) to allow for the proposed use Failure to do so could result m msufficIent utilIty support to thIS park, affectmg other current (exIstmg) users. 3 ApplIcant IS requestmg that Lot 34-C be converted to IndustrIal usage. In It....1 lIeu that Lot 34-C was open space deSIgnated for dry retentIOn (as an overflow from Tract "J"), applIcant IS reqUIred to demonstrate that the dry p~~ ! retention area of thIS lot IS no longer needed, or to whIch lot/tract dId the dry ~ii L.et retentIOn reqUIrement get transferred. The partIal letter from SFWMD f"l6Ui Ct; (Jll ~ ~F FVIYlrl-e:, III (unSIgned) does not mdIcate that the dry retentIOn of Lot 34-C IS no longer (t,ill.?( Of\4to ~rY\iPGl! ~ reqUIred, nor has the As-Built Master Dramage Plan" from the engmeer-of- record ROSSI and MalavasI Engmeers, Inc., ever been submItted to the City ~W1D) MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/10/01 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT It will be reqUired to submIt the back-up documentatIOn to substantIate that the aoolIcant's request for land use converSIOn. 4 ThIS lot IS also at the low pomt along Mmer Road whIch has roadway dramage structures and the dIscharge mto Lot 34-C. The applIcant does not o t.L-r mdIcate how he plans to treat thIS roadway dramage, both for the current ~f PIt:... two-lane roadway sectIon and the ultImate four-lane dIVIded roadway sectIon. 5 Quantum Lakes Dnve, from Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard, contams both water and wastewater system segments, to whIch at least one- cu-r half of the dedIcated nght-of-way will be reqUired to be utilIty easement(s) pcfOiL No antIcipated permanent "park amenItIes" will be permItted on the utilIty easement(s), other than soddmg and/or SIdewalk. This department will reqUire demonstratIon that "neglIgible Impacts on the traffic dIStributIon resultmg from the roadway reconfiguratIOn" SubmItted traffic analYSIS by the consultant does not meet DR! traffic performance standards, out ba.LL. 11'\ OUYlY)/\ -::>i-k.. O/1ltl l-ltJliW {Ulild--,/ relCl+cc1 ,-k h1 c., \ -' FIRE Comments. OUT 6 Roads and hydrants must be m place pnor to any constructIon above grade po-- ~ POLICE Comments: None -- ENGINEERING DMSION Comments: 7 Abandonment of a portIon of Quantum Lake Dnve will reqUire replattmg of OUT rxr that portIOn of Quantum Park m accordance WIth the reqUirements of the ~ Lt.- LDR, Chaoter 5 Platting. Lot 34C (NotIficatIOn of a Proposed Change, SectIon 5 4) IS proposed to be ,"-1 8 changed from undeslgnated use to IndustrIal use. How will thIS change ~U- Impact proposed open spaces and park areas wlthm the development? 9 PrOVIde venficatIOn that Palm Beach County Engmeenng will permIt a 6\.-CT dnveway opemng onto Mmer Road for Lot 34C Show how a second mgress and egress pomt will be prOVIded at the south end of the property for emergency serVIces. 10 If approved, an enVIronmental assessment of Tract 34C WIll be reqUired as 6UT .~v. ....v.....~u 'ULV LU~ Ul<11HlUl~ urul,;t:~s TO mInimIZe Imoact to the traveliol! MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/10/01 4 , , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT publIc. Also please address the Impact these proposed changes would have on access by emergency vehICles and law enforcement. 18 Identify the tract shown as MUI0l as MU60A and MU61A to show each lot's addItIOnal property due to the abandonment. Change MUI00 to otLT MUI02A. IX r (A..... BUILDING DIVISION Comments: None PARKS AND RECREATION Comments. 19 The City COmmISSIOn dId exempt, from the RecreatIOn DedIcation ReqUirement, 272 unIts of the 1,000 unIts reqUired In the most recent master plan reVISIOn. The developer dId pledge, however, to proVIde appropnate publIc recreatIOn facilIties for these umts. (To be determIned m conJunctIOn With the Parks DIVISIOn.) The total recreatIOn dedIcatIOn reqUirement will be calculated as follows. 1,000 umts-272 umts=728 D V 728 D V.x 015 =10.92 acres Y2 credIt may be gIVen against the reqUirement of land dedIcatIOn or payment of fees. 12 pnvate recreatIOn credIt will be calculated as follows 10,92 acres / 2=546 acres An addItional ~ credIt may be gIVen for natural resources against the reqUirement of land dedIcation or payment of fees. ~ credIt for natural resources will be calculated as follows 10,92 acres/4 = 273 acres The developer may want to conSIder dedIcatIOn of the land, or a combmatIOn of dedIcation and fee. 20 Natural resource credIt, If approved by the commISSIOn, IS subtracted off the RecreatIOn DedIcatIOn ReqUirement. 21 According to Chapter 1, ArtIcle V SectIon 3 of the Land Development RegulatIOn, the developer must prOVIde 5 park elements m order to qualIfy for 12 credIt for pnvate recreation prOVIded. Galav, Lusia From Sent: To Cc: Subject: Logan Laurinda Tuesday October 02,2001 12'00 PM Rumpf Michael Galav Lusia, Sugerman Dale; Kelley David RE Quantum NOPC #12 Per our conversation this morning Engineering acknowledges that Lot 34C is not included in the set-aside drainage needs for the Quantum Park Development. However we still would note that this does not change our position regarding the perception that, to date this lot has been labeled as set-aside for drainage and open space per the Master Plan I will not be in tomorrow but will be available to discuss this issue with you and Lucia further on Thursday Laurinda -Original Message----- From. Rumpf Michael Sent: Monday October 01 2001 5:08 PM To: Livergood Jeffrey' Logan, Laurinda; Hallahan, Kevin; Wildner John Cc: Galav Lusia Subject: Quantum NOPC #12 Just a reminder that your second review comments are due to Lusia as soon as possible To enable her to complete the review upon her return please forward by Wednesday, g.OO am Thanks and let me know if you have any questions on your revisions Mike 1 Greene, Quintus From' Sent: To Cc: Subject: Sugerman, Dale Monday, October 01, 2001 3'13 PM Bressner Kurt; Greene Quintus Logan, Laurinda Engineering Department Determination on Lot 34-C, Quantum Corporate Park Good A fternoon- This e-mail message is to verbally confirm that the Engineering Department has made a determination that lot 34-C in Quantum Corporate Park does not carry the designation of drainage retention. We are awaiting the return of Lusia Galav to formally transmit this determination in writing to her Dale 1 Rr;:ference Page 1 of2 Boynton Beach, FL Code of Ordinances PART III LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATlONS* CHAPTER 4 SITE PLAN REVIEW Q llJ>...I--JTUj../.tPAf2lL- ML'D tf: 17- Section 8. Review standards. The followmg standards shall be utIlIzed by the planmng and zomng department and all other applIcable departments for reVIew and evaluatIOn of all reqUired plans and exhibIts. A. Natural enVIronment: All proposed developments shall be deSIgned to preserve, perpetuate and Improve the eXIstmg natural character of the SIte. EXIstmg natIve trees and other landscape features shall, to the maXImum extent possible, be preserved m theIr natural state, and addItIOnal landscape features shall be provIded to enhance archItectural features, to relate structural desIgn to the SIte, and to conceal unattractIve uses. In all mstances the CIty'S landscapmg and all other applIcable regulatIOns shall be fully complIed wIth as mmImum standards. B Open space Adequate landscaped open space shall be provIded WhICh meets the partIcular needs and demands of the proposed development. The type and dIstributIon of all open space shall be determmed by the character, mtensIty and antIcIpated resIdentIal or user composItIOn of the proposed development. C CIrCUlatIOn and parkmg: All cIrCUlatIOn systems and parkmg facIlItIes wIthm a proposed development shall be deSIgned and located m such a manner as to comply wIth the followmg' 1 A clearly defined vehIcular cIrCUlatIOn system shall be prOVIded WhICh allows free movement wIthm the proposed development whIle dIscouragmg exceSSIve speeds. VehIcular cIrCUlatIOn systems shall be separated as much as practIcable from pedestnan CIrculatIOn systems. 2. Access pomts to penpheral streets shall be prOVIded WhICh adequately serve the proposed development and WhICh are compatible and functIOnal wIth CIrculatIOn systems outSIde the development. 3 Whenever possible m proposed resIdential developments, IIvmg umts should be located on residentIal streets or courts WhICh are deSIgned to dIscourage non-local through traffic FYI 4 Off-street parkmg areas shall be prOVIded WhICh adequately accommodate maxImum vehIcle storage demands for the proposed development and are located and deSIgned m such a manner so as to serve the uses m the proposed development and not create mcompatible VIsual relatIOnshIps. 5 Safe and effiCIent acce~s to all areas of the proposed development shall be prOVIded for ~mergency and servIce vehIcles. 6 SIdewalks shall be provIded as reqUired by the CIty regulatIOns. 7 Conformance wIth the CIty and county thoroughfare plans IS reqUired. 8 ComplIance wIth the Palm Beach Traffic Performance Ordmance IS reqUired. D CommunIty servIces All proposed developments shall be deSIgned and located m such a manner as to ensure the adequate prOVISIOn of the followmg commumty servIces http./ /www.amlegal.comlboynton_beach_flIlpe./287f?fn=document-frame.htm&f=template 9/13/2001 Reference Page 2 of 2 1 FIre protectIOn, 2. PolIce protectIOn. E. BUIldmgs and other structures All bUIldmgs and structures proposed to be located wIthm a development shall be orIented and desIgned m such a manner as to enhance, rather than detract from, the overall qualIty of the SIte and ItS Immediate envIronment. The followmg gUIdelInes shall be followed m the reVIew and evaluatIOn of all bUIldmgs and structures 1 Proposed bUIldmgs and structures shall be related harmomously to the terram, other bUIldmgs and the surroundmg neIghborhood, and shall not create through theIr locatIOn, style, color or texture mcompatible phYSIcal or VIsual relatIOnshIps. 2. All bUIldmgs and structures shall be desIgned and orIented m a manner ensurmg maXImum prIvacy of resIdential uses and related actIvItIes both on the SIte bemg developed and adjacent property 3 All permanent outdoor IdentIficatIOn features whIch are mtended to call attentIOn to a proposed development and/or structures shall be desIgned and located m such a manner as to be an mtegral part of the development. 4 All bUIldmgs and structures shall comply WIth the commumty deSIgn plan. F Concurrency and level of servIce standards For the purpose of the Issuance of development orders and permIts, the CIty of Boynton Beach has adopted level of servIce standards for publIc facIlItIes and servIces whIch mclude roads, sanItary sewer, solId waste, dramage, potable water, and parks and recreatIOn, ComplIance WIth levels of servIce as stated m the Boynton Beach ComprehensIve Plan IS reqUIred. http.l /www.amlegal.com/boynton_beach_Wlpe.l287f?fn=document-frame.htm&f=template 9/13/2001 PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #01-106 FROM Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning John Wildner, Parks Director Lusia Galav TO cc RE Quantum NOpe #11 Date October 4, 2001 Please amend memo #01-12 dated January 30, 2001 to include the following comment. The applicability of and/or amount of recreation impact fee owed for additional residential units shall be considered at sit plan stage attachment JW/vlr Page 1 of I LEISURE SERVICES. PARKS MEMORANDUM #01-12 FROM Michael Rumph Director of Planning and Zoning John Wildner, Parks Direcmrr Lusia Galav TO CC RE Quantum NOPC #1 Date January 30, 2001 The Parks Division has reviewed the developer's response to the first review comments to Quantum NOPC #1 The following comments are submitted 1 ) The City Commission did exempt from the Recreation Dedication Requirement of 272 units of the 1,000, units required in the most recent master plan revision The developerj did pledge, however, to provide appropriate public recreation facilities for these units. (To be determined in coniunction with the Parks Division) At the minimum the developer is required to provide 1,000 units - 272 units = 728 D U 728 DUX 015 acres = 1092 acres assuming '/2 credit for private recreation = 5 46 acres assuming V4 credit for natural reserve = 2 73 acres Considering the impact of the original 272 units, ,this 2 73 acres should be higher (3 75 acres), depending on agreements with the City 2 ) Natural resource credit, if approved by the commission, is subtracted off the Recreation Dedication Requirement. 3 ) Comment regarding '/2 credit for private recreation remains 4 ) If the property is not further planted, Recreation Fees or Dedications are due prior to the issuing of additional residential building permits 5 ) Comment concerning the as built plans for irrigation in rights of way and medians is requested in case the City needs to perform future maintenance and/or modification JW /vl r Staff Response to the Request in the Quantum Park NOPC 12 to Change the Land Use Designation on Lots 7-11 and 23-31 Staff does not support the request to change the current office Industrial and office land use designations on lots and 23-31, respectively, to Mixed Use to facilitate further residential development in the Quantum PID This staff position is based on the following considerations. First, the Quantum PID was established in order to diversify the city's tax base and provide a master planned community suitable for attracting and retaining technology, office, industrial and distribution uses. Staff is concerned about whether it is in the city's interest to forfeit the long range economic and land use policies that led to the creation of the Quantum PID Second, those who developed the existing office, industrial and distribution facilities in the Quantum PI D did so with the expectation that they were investing in a city sanctioned planned industrial park. Staff is concerned that changing the land use designation on lots 7-11 and 23- 31 to Mixed Use which would to permit additional residential development, without consulting these property owners, could further erode the city's credibility and adversely affect its ability to attract and retain other industrial and distribution uses. These concerns notwithstanding, staff recognizes that there may be other, overriding, considerations related to current economic and market conditions. Accordingly, should the Commission decide to grant the request to change the land use designation on lots 7-11 and 23-31 to Mixed Use, which includes residential development, staff would recommend that apartments or congregate care/living facilities be prohibited and that any residential development be restricted to fee simple with an appropriate price point. Plannine: Memorandum. Forester / Environmentalist To LusIa Galav, PnncIpal Planner From. Kevm J Hallahan, Forester / EnvIronmentalIst Subject: Quantum Park NOPC #12 Lot 34-C MPMD 01-003 2nd ReVIew Date' October 2,2001 1 Lot 34-C IS shown on the Quantum Park Master Plan as a 658 acres detentIOn (open space) area and IS contIguous to the 25 7 acres Sand Pme Preserve. The proposed land use change of lot 34-C from detentIOn (open space) to mdustnal, could affect the envIronmental qualIty ofthe contIguous Sand Pme Preserve when the mdustnal tract IS sold and developed by the future owner I thmk the land use change of a parcellS a master plan Issue and WIll contmue to also be a SIte plan Issue. 2 DO #84-51 SectIon 4 Item #11, page 6 ReqUIres the removal of all Melaleuca, BrazIllIan Pepper, & AustralIan Pme trees from the SIte There are numerous trees of tlns descnptIon on the lot 34-C that should be removed by the applIcant. Kjh FIle fY1tLSfeL 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS Master Plan Modification ProJect name: Quantum Park File number MPMD 01-003 Reference' 151 reVIew plans IdentIfied as Master Plan ModIficatIOn. File 01-003 With an August 14, 2001 Plannmg and Zomng Department date stamp marking. , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments. None PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: See attached memo from Jeff LlVergood, PublIc Works DIrector dated August 29,2001 UTILITIES Comments: " X Lots 7 thru 11, and Lots 23 thru 31, located on Quantum Boulevard (a " total of 14 lots) were the subJect of Quantum Park Amendment #11 / (MPMD 00-007) to whIch we responded to m UtilItIes Department Memorandum #01-012, dated January 11, 2001 To recapItulate those comments, we stated that With the orIginal DRI for the total park desIgned for CommerCIal, Industnal, Office, or a combmatIOn of Office and Industnal, and/or Office, Industnal and CommerCIal, both the water and wastewater systems to support these type of uses was deSIgned and constructed for those antIcIpated uses. Four (4) 11ft statIOns were configured to handle the wastewater generatIOn antIcIpated m the 550 acre park. eD As preVIously stated, the proposed reVISIOn to the land use to "MIxed Use (MU)" to mclude Office, CommerCIal and ReSIdentIal uses could tax the ~ utilIty support facilIties to theIr lImIts. A prOVISO needs to be mcorporated / mto each group of lot approvals process, that the deSIgn engmeerIng consultant shall demonstrate that suffiCIent utIlIty system(s) capaCIty IS available to support the proposed use, or they will prOVIde the necessary upgrade(s) to allow for the proposed use. Failure to do so could result m msufficIent utilIty support to thIS park, affectmg other current (exIstmg) users, ~ ApplIcant IS requestmg that Lot 34-C be converted to IndustrIal usage In lIeu that Lot 34-C was open space deSIgnated for dry retentIOn (as an J overflow from Tract "J"), applIcant IS reqUIred to demonstrate that the dry retentIon area of thIS lot IS no longer needed, or to whIch lot/tract dId the dry retentIOn reqUIrement get transferred. The partial letter from SFWMD (unSIgned) does not mdIcate that the dry retentIOn of Lot 34-C IS no longer reqUIred, nor has the "As-Built Master Dramage Plan" from the engmeer-of- record ROSSI and MalavasI Engmeers, Inc , ever been submItted to the CIty MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/10/01 2 . , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT It will be reqUIred to subrmt the back-up documentatIon to substantIate that the applIcant's reQuest for land use converSIOn. ,~ ThIS lot IS also at the low pomt along Mmer Road whIch has roadway ~ / dramage structures and the dIscharge mto Lot 34-C The applIcant does not mdIcate how he plans to treat thIS roadway dramage, both for the current two-lane roadway sectIOn and the ultImate four-lane dIVIded roadway sectIon, X Quantum Lakes Dnve, from Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard, contams both water and wastewater system segments, to whIch at least one- / half of the dedIcated nght-of-way will be reQUIred to be utilIty easement( s) No antICIpated permanent "park amemtIes" will be permItted on the utIlIty easement(s), other than soddmg and/or SIdewalk. ThIS department will reqUIre demonstratIOn that "neghgible Impacts on the traffic dIstributIOn resultmg from the roadway reconfiguratIOn" SubmItted traffic analYSIS by the consultant does not meet DR! traffic performance standards. FIRE Comments: thr-Jt X Roads and hydrants must be m place pnor to any constructIon above grade. V POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DNISION Comments: X Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve will reqUIre replattmg of / that portIon of Quantum Park m accordance WIth the reqUIrements of the LDR. Chapter 5 Plattmg. :Y Lot 34C (NotIficatIOn of a Proposed Change, SectIOn 5 4) IS proposed to be ./ changed from undesIgnated use to Industnal use How will thIS change tr:o Impact proposed open spaces and park areas wIthm the development? p4x;\ RaclY'f 01 SfwMl) f PrOVIde venficatIOn that Palm Beach County Engmeenng will permIt a / dnveway opemng onto Mmer Road for Lot 34C Show how a second mgress and egress pomt wIll be prOVIded at the south end of the property for emergency servIces. )( If approved, an envIronmental assessment of Tract 34C will be reqUired as V r (hf\.V ~~ MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/10/01 3 . . DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT part of any SIte submIttal. e Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve will Isolate the dedIcated roadway easement along the north property Ime of Lot 61 The NotIficatIOn of a Proposed Change, Section 5.5, indIcates access will be prOVIded VIa a ~ Single entrance point at the intersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Quantum Boulevard. ElIminatIOn of that portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and the second access pomt will create an undeSIrably long trIp for the most northerly reSIdents of the proposed multI-family reSIdentIal development and would create a hazardous SItuatIon for emergency semces needmg to access northerlv portIOns of that same development. ~ Abandonment of a portIon of Quantum Lake Dnve and reconfigunng a portIon of It Into Lot 101 will create an undeSIrably long trIp for the most L/ northerly tenants of the proposed new lot and will create a hazardous SItuatIOn for emergency semces needing to access northerly portIOns of that same development. ~ ReconfiguratIOn of Lots 62 and 63 mto a Single Lot 102 would create the v' same SItuatIOn described In the above Paragraphs 2 and 3 for the southerly tenants of the proposed new lot. IA The NotificatIOn of a Proposed Change, SectIOn 5,5, paragraph 3, represents the intersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Gateway Boulevard as substandard and dangerous, ThIS intersectIon has preVIously been reVIewed V and approved. Please prOVIde addItional mformatIon (aCCIdent data and standard draWings) supportmg thIS statement. -rA~ vD >i If the areas MUI0l and Lot 34C are new, developable parcels then an / addItional recreatIonal fee (or land In lIeu of fee) may be assessed based on the ongInal calculatIOns for the CIty park. 16 The creatIOn of Lots 100 and 101 and the re-deslgnatIOn of Lot 34C from undesIgnated to IndustrIal will obVIously mcrease traffic volumes, The Traffic AnalYSIS (Quantum Park NOPC #12) states that" will not result In an mcrease In daily or peak hour volumes" Although the analYSIS concludes that there are no Increases In the approved daily and peak hour trIps due to SImultaneous Increases and decreases In allowable development mtensItIes, the analYSIS needs to further address local changes In traffic volumes that would result from the proposed changes. 17 The Traffic AnalYSIS (Quantum Park NOPC #12) acknowledges that the closure of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve has the potential to Impact the regIOnal roadway network. The analYSIS further states that dIverted traffic will cause the mtersectIon of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard to operate over capaCIty dunng the PM peak hour The analYSIS proposes changes In strIpmg and roadway wIdemng to address thIS Without providmg a tImetable. Please be more speCIfic as to how and when thIS work Will be Incorporated mto the planning process to mmImIze imoact to the traveling \3 LU b MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/1 % 1 4 , . DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT publIc. Also please address the Impact these proposed changes would have on access by emergency vehIcles and law enforcement. 18 Identify the tract shown as MUI0l as MU60A and MU61A to show each lot's addItional property due to the abandonment. Change MUI00 to MUI02A. v-- ( BUILDING DIVISION -?r 17 {II (/ ," Comments: None ~ ARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 19 The City CommISSIOn dId exempt, from the RecreatIOn DedIcatIOn ReqUirement, 272 umts of the 1,000 unItS reqUired m the most recent master plan reVISIOn, The developer dId pledge, however, to prOVIde appropnate publIc recreation facilIties for these umts. (To be deterrmned In conJunctIOn WIth the Parks DIVISIOn.) The total recreatIOn dedIcatIOn reqUirement will be calculated as follows. 1,000 umts-272 umts=728 D U 728 D V.x 015 =10 92 acres Y2 credIt may be gIVen agamst the reqUirement of land dedIcatIOn or payment of fees. Y2 pnvate recreation credIt will be calculated as follows. 10.92 acres / 2=546 acres An additIOnal ~ credIt may be gIven for natural resources agamst the reqUirement of land dedIcation or payment of fees, 'l4 credIt for natural resources will be calculated as follows. 1092 acres/4 = 2.73 acres The developer may want to conSIder dedIcatIOn of the land, or a combmatIOn of dedIcation and fee. 20 Natural resource credIt, If approved by the commISSIOn, IS subtracted off the RecreatIOn DedIcation ReqUirement. 21 Accordmg to Chapter 1, Article V Section 3 of the Land Development RegulatIOn, the developer must prOVIde 5 park elements m order to qualIfy for Yz credIt for pnvate recreation prOVIded. ( IR6 MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/10/01 2 . " DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT It Will be reqUired to subrmt the back-up documentatIOn to substantIate that the applIcant's reauest for land use converSIOn. 4 TIus lot IS also at the low pOint along Mmer Road whIch has roadway drainage structures and the dIscharge Into Lot 34-C The applIcant does not indIcate how he plans to treat thIS roadway drainage, both for the current two-lane roadway sectIon and the ultImate four-lane dIVIded roadway sectIon. 5 Quantum Lakes Dnve, from Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard, containS both water and wastewater system segments, to whIch at least one- half of the dedIcated nght-of-wav \vill be reaUIred to be utilIty easement( s) No antICIpated permanent "park amenItIes" will be permItted on the utilIty easement(s), other than sodding and/or SIdewalk. ThIS department will reqUire demonstratIOn that "neglIgible Impacts on the traffic dIstributIon resulting from the roadway reconfiguratIon" Subrmtted traffic analYSIS by the consultant does not meet DR! traffic performance standards. FIRE Comments. 6 Roads and hydrants must be In place pnor to any constructIon above grade ~~ POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments, 7 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve WIll reqUire replattmg of that portIon of Quantum Park In accordance WIth the reqUirements of the LDR. Chanter 5, Platting. 8 Lot 34C (NotIficatIon of a Proposed Change, Section 5 4) IS proposed to be changed from undesIgnated use to IndustrIal use. How will thIS change Impact proposed open spaces and park areas Within the development? 9 PrOVIde venficatIOn that Palm Beach County Engmeenng will permIt a dnveway opemng onto Miner Road for Lot 34C Show how a second Ingress and egress pOint Will be proVIded at the south end of the property for emergency serVIces. 10 If approved, an envIronmental assessment of Tract 34C will be reqUired as 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS Master Plan Modification ,~ ProJect name: Quantum Park File number MPMD 01-003 Reference: 1 st reVIew plans Identified as Master Plan ModIficatIOn. File 01-003 WIth an August 14. 2001 Plannmg and Zomng Department date stamp marking. , , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments. None PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments. See attached memo from Jeff Livergood, Public Works DIrector dated :J~ rn~ ~1 Kahvf ~nk{' August 29,2001 . UTILITIES Comments. I~ Lots 7 thru 11, and Lots 23 thru 31, located on Quantum Boulevard (a total of 14 lots) were the subject of Quantum Park Amendment #11 (MPMD 00-007) to whIch we responded to m UtilitIes Department Memorandum #01-012, dated January 11, 2001 To recapItulate those comments, we stated that With the ongInal DR! for the total park desIgned for CommercIal, Industnal, Office, or a combmatIOn of Office and Industnal, and/or Office, Industnal and CommercIal, both the water and wastewater systems to support these type of uses was deSIgned and constructed for those antICIpated uses. Four (4) lift stations were configured to handle the wastewater generatIOn antiCIpated m the 550 acre park. (V As preVIously stated, the proposed reVISIon to the land use to "MIXed Use (MU)" to mclude Office, CommerCIal and ReSIdential uses could tax the utility support facilities to theIr lIrmts. A proVISO needs to be mcorporated mto each group of lot approvals process, that the deSIgn engmeenng consultant shall demonstrate that suffiCIent utility system(s) capaCIty IS available to support the proposed use, or they will prOVIde the necessary upgrade(s) to allow for the proposed use. Failure to do so could result m msufficIent utility support to thIS park, affectmg other current (exIstmg) ~ users. ~ Applicant IS requestmg that Lot 34-C be converted to IndustrIal usage. In lieu that Lot 34-C was open space deSIgnated for dry retentIOn (as an overflow from Tract "J"), applicant IS reqUired to demonstrate that the dry retentIOn area of thIS lot IS no longer needed, or to whIch lot/tract dId the dry retention reqUirement get transferred. The partIal letter from SFWMD (unSIgned) does not mdIcate that the dry retention of Lot 34-C IS no longer reqUired, nor has the "As-Built Master Dramage Plan" from the engmeer-of- record ROSSI and MalavasI Engmeers, Inc., ever been submItted to the CIty ?02~ I. mo~ I r1 ~~t - ChZf('(,JU Ivrv-'{~ tw~ MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/10/01 2 DEPARTMENTS It will be reqUired to submIt the back-up documentatIon to substantIate that the a l1cant's re uest for land use converSIOn. ThIS lot IS also at the low pomt along Mmer Road whIch has roadway dramage structures and the dIscharge mto Lot 34-C. The appl1cant does not mdIcate how he plans to treat thIS roadway dramage, both for the current two-lane roadway sectIOn and the ultImate four-lane dIVlded roadway sectIon, Quantum Lakes Dnve, from Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard, contams both water and wastewater system segments, to whIch at least one- half of the dedIcated nght-of-way will be reqUired to be util1ty easement( s) No antICIpated permanent "park amemtIes" will be permItted on the util1ty easement(s), other than soddmg and/or SIdewalk. ThIS department will reqUire demonstratIOn that "negl1gible Impacts on the traffic dlstributlOn resultmg from the roadway reconfiguratIOn" Submitted traffic analYSIS by the consultant does not meet DR! traffic performance standards. FIRE Comments: /I;()tJ ~ ( Roads and hydrants must be m place pnor to any constructIon above grade, POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DNISION Comments. ~ Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve will reqUIre replattmg of that portIon of Quantum Park m accordance With the reqUirements of the LDR Cha ter 5 Plattm . Lot 34C (NotIficatIOn of a Proposed Change, SectIon 5 4) IS proposed to be changed from undesIgnated use to IndustrIal use. How will thIS change Impact proposed open spaces and park areas wlthm the development? ProvId venficatIOn that Palm Beach County Engmeenng will permIt a If ap roved, an enVlronmental assessment of Tract 34C will be reqUIred as INCLUDE REJECT pef1cLu1V rfJ~tfo{ SPWD+ ~ !V MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/10/01 3 DEPARTMENTS part of any sIte submIttal. ~ ,...-....., ~ Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve Will Isolate the dedIcated roadway easement along the north property Ime of Lot 61 The Notification of a Proposed Change, Section 5.5, mdIcates access will be proVIded VIa a smgle entrance pomt at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Quantum Boulevard. ElImmatIOn of that portIon of Quantum Lakes Dnve and the second access pomt will create an undeSIrably long trIp for the most northerly reSIdents of the proposed multi-family reSIdential development and would create a hazardous SItuation for emergency servIces needmg to access northerl ortIOns of that same develo ment. Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve and reconfigunng a portIOn of It mto Lot 101 will create an undeSIrably long trIp for the most northerly tenants of the proposed new lot and will create a hazardous situation for emergency servIces needmg to access northerly portIOns of that same development. ReconfiguratIOn of Lots 62 and 63 mto a smgle Lot 102 would create the same SItuation described m the above Paragraphs 2 and 3 for the southerly tenants of the proposed new lot. 14 The NotificatIOn of a Proposed Change, SectIon 5,5, paragraph 3, represents the mtersectIon of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Gateway Boulevard as substandard and dangerous. ThIS mtersectIon has preVIOusly been reVIewed and approved. Please prOVIde addItIonal mformatIOn (aCCIdent data and standard draWings) supportmg thIS statement. ( developable parcels then an ssessed bas 16 The creation of Lots 100 and 101 and the re-desIgnatIOn of Lot 34C from undesIgnated to IndustrIal will obVIously mcrease traffic volumes. The Traffic AnalYSIS (Quantum Park NOPC #12) states that" will not result m an mcrease m daily or peak hour volumes" Although the analysIS concludes that there are no mcreases m the approved daily and peak hour trIpS due to SImultaneous mcreases and decreases m allowable development mtensItIes, the analYSIS needs to further address local changes m traffic volumes that would result from the proposed changes. 17 The Traffic AnalYSIS (Quantum Park NOPC #12) acknowledges that the closure of a portIon of Quantum Lakes Dnve has the potential to Impact the regIOnal roadway network. The analYSIS further states that dIVerted traffic will cause the mtersectIon of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard to operate over capaCIty dunng the PM peak hour The analYSIS proposes changes m strIpmg and roadway widening to address thIS Without proVIdmg a tImetable. Please be more speCIfic as to how and when thIS work will be incoroorated mto the olanning: orocess to mimmize imoact to the traveling: INCLUDE REJECT ~Y1'W ,~ (~' Y~lL lv 'I Ie); MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/1 % 1 4 DEPARTMENTS public. Also please address the Impact these proposed changes would have on access by emergency vehIcles and law enforcement. 60A and MU61A to show each e aban . Change 0 BUILDING DNISION Comments. None PARKS AND RECREA nON ,-~ e CIty CommISSIon dId exempt, from the RecreatIOn DedIcatIOn ReqUIrement, 272 umts of the 1,000 unItS reqUIred m the most recent master plan reVISIOn, The developer dId pledge, however, to prOVIde appropnate public recreation facilities for these umts. (To be determIned m conjUnctIOn With the Parks DlVlsIOn.) The total recreatIOn dedIcation reqUIrement will be calculated as follows, 1,000 unIts-272 unIts=728 D U 728 D U.X 015 =10 92 acres Yz credIt may be gIVen agamst the reqUIrement of land dedIcation or payment of fees. Yz pnvate recreatIOn credIt will be calculated as follows. 10.92 acres / 2=546 acres An addItional Y4 credIt may be gIVen for natural resources agamst the reqUIrement of land dedIcation or payment of fees. Y4 credIt for natural resources will be calculated as follows. ~ ~ 10.92 acres/4 = 273 acres The developer may want to conSIder dedIcatIOn of the land, or a combmatIOn of dedIcation and fee. atural resource credIt, If approved by the commISSIOn, IS subtracted off the Recreation DedIcatIOn ReqUIrement. Accordmg to Chapter 1, ArtIcle V SectIOn 3 of the Land Development Regulation, the developer must prOVIde 5 park elements m order to qualify for Y2 credIt for pnvate recreatIOn prOVIded. INCLUDE l~ fif V~. Lbh ~ lJ..J , MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/10/01 5 ~' . II ~ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ..33:/ If the property IS not further platted, recreatIOn fees or dedIcatIOns for the 728 non-exempt dwellIng umts are due before the Issumg of theIr resIdential building permIts, FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments. 23 I am requesting the applIcant as a condItion to the above Master Plan ModIficatIOn to respond to my letter of May 14,2001 (as dIrected by our City Manager) In reference to the Quantum Park-DR! Annual EnVironmental Areas Status Report. 24 Lot 34-C IS shown on the Quantum Park Master Plan as a 6.58 acres detention (open space) area and IS contiguous to the 25 7 acres Sand Pine Preserve, The land use change oflot 34-C from detentIon (open space) to industrIal, could affect the enVironmental qualIty of the contiguous Sand Pme Preserve when the mdustrIal tract IS developed by the o\Vner 25 In December 1998 a 6-foot hIgh chain link fence was Installed around 1 ) lot 34-C (6.58acres) and 2.) Water Management Tract "J" (6.16 acres) and connected to the eXIsting fence around the penmeter of the 3) Sand Pme Preserve (25.7 acres) ThIS was to protect the envIronmental qualIty of the total of 38.44 acres III the three separate tracts, and suggest that the three tracts are all one and shown as open space / Sand Pine Preserve on the Quantum Master Plan. ThIS area should remam as open space / Sand Pine Preserve. The project should contmue m the normal reView process. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments. ~ The Land Use Acreage Table IS Incorrect as shown on page 5 of the NOPC applIcatIOn. Amendment #10 was approved for 84.35 ac of (01) and 26.33 ac of (OIC) Correct thIS information on the applIcatIOn. I ^ The Land Use Aereage Tables on page 5 of the appheanon and on the Master Plan drawmg show a decrease In the (01C) category (26.33 acres approved, 22.94 acres proposed) but the amendment does not propose a change to any (01C) deSIgnated lots. Please explain') ~ The Land Use Acreage Table on page 5 of the applIcatIOn and on the NOPC Master Plan # 12 draWIng IS Incorrect The eXIsting (MU) lots add up to 62.38 acres. The addItIOnal (MU) lots proposed m thIS amendment add up MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/10/01 6 )2. z DEPARTMENTS to 26 82 acres. Together they total 89.20 acres plan. Please correct. S shown on the Lot 34-C has been labeled on the Master Plan as "DetentIon" up through NOPC Master Plan Amendment #8 For some reason, the detentIOn label does not appear on NOPC Master Plans #9 or #10 even though no change to' the deSIgnatIOn of thIS lot was proposed or approved In eIther amendment. ThIS lot remams a DetentIon lot WIth no development deSIgnatIon assIgned. Please indIcate thIS In your applIcatIOn and prOVIde data and analysIs to support the elImmatIon of thIS area for detentIOn. ProVIde SIte area acreage calculatIons for proposed lots 100 and 101, The Land use acreage Table on page 5 and on the NOPC Master Plan #12 draWing shows a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space. Does thIS reflect the 6.59-acre DetentIOn lot (34-C) plus any open space assocIated WIth the elInnnatIOn of the nght-of-way? Please c1anfy Lots 73-A through 76 should be hIghlIghted as cOmmItted development. SIte Plan approval was granted on 8/7/01 ThIS should also be reflected In the proJect traffic 2002 estImate In the Pmder Troutman traffic analysIs. Lot 50-A should also be hIghlIghted as cOmmItted development (On ana GranIte) SIte Plan approval was granted on 6/6/00 ThIS should be reflected m the project traffic 2001 estImate m the Pmder Troutman traffic analysIs. The Master Plan indIcates that the acreage for the IndustrIal category IS increaSing by 6.56 acres yet the allowable mtenslty for thIS category IS decreaSing by 375,354 square feet. Please c1anfy thIS mconslstency The Master Plan mdIcates the acreage for the Office categones (0, 01) IS decreasmg; yet the allowable intensIty for thIS category IS increaSing by 72, 922 square feet. Please c1anfy thIS inCOnsIstency The Master Plan mdIcates a proposed new access from Mmer Road for Lot 34-C The traffic analYSIS must specIfically address thIS access Since It IS not mtegrated Into the traffic cIrculatIon system for the rest of the Pill How , many trIps are allocated for thIS SIte and how WIll It Impact Miner Road? The NOPC applIcatIon page 9 contams two converSIon formulas for reSIdentIal umts, They do not appear on the Master Plan. As shown they rovlde two dIfferent converSIOn formulas for the same use - ReSIdential Unit. What is the ouroose of these formulas? Please c1anfY thIS INCLUDE REJECT ot-- ;' '8 ./\j)~ J jt;;> \ To be..- r"f",~ ;Vl MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/10/01 7 DEP ARTMENTS mconslstency or remove them from the applIcatIon. <:1. Approval of the Master Plan IS contmgent upon a findmg of no substantIal devIatIon by the CIty ThIS IS based on the followmg sectIons of the Flonda Statutes. a) Chapter 38006 (19) (b) 9 An mcrease m the number of dwellIng umts by five (5) percent of 50 umts, whIchever IS greater b) Chapter 380 06 (19) (e) 5.c Not wlthstandmg any prOVIsIOn m paragraph (b) to the contrary, a proposed change conslstmg of SImultaneous mcrease and decreases of at least two of the uses wlthm an authonzed multI-use development of regIOnal Impact whIch was ongmally approved WIth more than three uses speCIfied m 380 0651 (3) (c), (d), (f) and g and reSIdentIal use. c) Chapter 38006 (19) (e) 5 b Except for the types of uses lIsted m subparagraph (b) 16 , any change whIch would result m the development of any area whIch was speCIfically set aSIde m the applIcatIOn for development approval or m the development order for preservatIOn, buffers, or speCIal protectIOn, mcludmg habItat for plant and ammal speCIes, archeologIcal and hIstoncal SItes and other speCIal areas The applIcatIOn as presented IS presumed to be a substantIal deVIatIOn. ThIS presumptIon may be rebutted by clear and convmcmg eVIdence, The applIcant must prOVIde addItIonal mformatIOn before determInatIon of no substantIal deVIatIOn IS made. The addItIonal mformatIon must mclude: A reVIsed traffic analYSIS based on comments receIved from Palm Beach County and the CIty of Boynton Beach TechnIcal ReVIew CommIttee. Demonstrate how the proposed change from the Office (0) and OfficelIndustrIal (01) categones to the MU category IS conSIstent WIth the ComprehensIve Plan, PrOVIde an updated analYSIS of the master dramage plan for Quantum Park clearly mdlcatmg the Impacts that an mdustrIal development on the current DetentIon Tract 34-C would have. Demonstrate how a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space will be mitIgated. Under the condItIOn of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development Order and Chapter 3, ArtIcle IV of the Land Development RegulatIons, a traffic analYSIS IS reqUIred for thIS Master Plan approval. The applicant submItted a traffic analYSIS. In lieu of an mdependent traffic consultant, the staff and the Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISIOn will reVIew the traffic study ~\ The Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISIOn has reVIewed the traffic study and demed approval due to the followmg: a. The traffic generated by the hIgh school (about 2,283 dally trIpS) should be counted as vested trIpS \vlthm the overall Quantum development traffic generations, b Daily and peak hour trIpS related to "ADA Approvals" as presented m Attachments I A. 1 B and I C must reflect the values of the latest NOPC INCLUDE REJECT I StiJfi ~/ st1froJ fJ, I.' ~ f$t')~ 8ff --- MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/10/01 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT approval. (Ref. Letter from Masoud Atefi, Palm Beach County to Michael Rumpf dated 8/20/01) Please respond to these comments and reVIse the traffic study accordmgly The NOPC Master Plan submIttal dId not mclude a conceptual SIte plan or JUstIficatIOn for the requested change, The CIty approved the MIxed-Use deSIgnatIOn when It adopted Amendment #10 m March 2000 To date, no development has been proposed WhICh combmes all the uses reqUired by the Land Development RegulatIons m the defimtIOn of a Mixed Use Pod m a Pill The only plans submItted and approved to date are for Villas at Quantum Lake (a.k.a. Grotto Bay) s~ '1~ 0.S The proposed abandonment of a ortIan of Quan Dnve and the of Lots 100, 1 and 103 will reqUire a replat of that portion 0 e Pill plat. On June 25, 2001, a letter was sent to DaVId, B Noms, Counsel for the applIcant requestmg several reVISIOns to the Annual Status Report for the Quantum Park Pill DR!. To date, those reVISIOns have not been made. Please reVIse the annual report accordmgly and prOVIde the reVISIons at the Se tember 11, 2001 TRC meetm , JJ ReVIse the SubstantIal DeVIatIOn Chart m the applIcatIOn for the Open Spaces category The chart mdIcates N/C for the proposed change when the elmllnatIOn of the detentIOn area IS proposed. Also reVIew the numbers for the IndustrIal and Office categones, as they do not match the NOPC Master Plan #12 drawmg. MWRJsc S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPlPROJECTSIQuanlum Park 2001 MPMD & DRIAIMPMD 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc ruJ w /" 1 sf REVIEW COMMENTS Master Plan Modification ProJect name Quantum Park File number MPMD 01-003 Reference' 1 S(revIew plans IdentIfied as Master Plan ModIficatIOn. File 01-003 wIth an August 14. 2001 Planmng and Zomng Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: None PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: See attached memo from Jeff LIvergood, PublIc Works DIrector dated August 29, 2001 UTILITIES Comments, 1 Lots 7 thru 11, and Lots 23 thru 31, located on Quantum Boulevard (a total of 14 lots) were the subject of Quantum Park Amendment #11 (MPMD 00-007) to whIch we responded to m UtilItIes Department Memorandum #01-012, dated January 11, 2001 To recapItulate those comments, we stated that With the ongInal DR! for the total park deSIgned for CommercIal, Industnal, Office, or a combmatIOn of Office and Industnal, and/or Office, IndustrIal and CommercIal, both the water and wastewater systems to support these type of uses was deSIgned and constructed for those antIcIpated uses. Four (4) 11ft statIons were configured to handle the wastewater generatIon antICIpated m the 550 acre park. 2 As prevIOusly stated, the proposed reVISIon to the land use to "MIxed Use (MU)" to mclude Office, CommerCIal and ReSIdentIal uses could tax the utilIty support facilItIes to theIr lllrutS. A prOVISO needs to be mcorporated mto each group of lot approvals process, that the deSIgn engmeenng consultant shall demonstrate that suffiCIent utilIty system(s) capaCIty IS available to support the proposed use, or they will proVIde the necessary upgrade(s) to allow for the proposed use. Failure to do so could result m msufficIent utilIty support to thIS park, effectmg other current (exIstmg) users. 3 ApplIcant IS requestmg that Lot 34-C be converted to IndustrIal usage In lIeu that Lot 34-C was open space deSIgnated for dry retentIon (as an overflow from Tract "J"), applIcant IS reqUIred to demonstrate that the dry retentIon area of thIS lot IS no longer needed, or to WhICh lot/tract dId the dry retentIOn reqUIrement get transferred. The partIal letter from SFWMD (unSIgned) does not mdICate that the dry retentIon of Lot 34-C IS no longer reqUIred, nor has the "As-Built Master Dramage Plan" from the engmeer-of- record ROSSI and MalavasI Engmeers, Inc , ever been submItted to the City It will be reqUIred to submIt the back-up documentatIon to substantIate that MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/04/0 I 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT the applIcant's request for land use converSIOn. 4 ThIS lot IS also at the low pomt along Miner Road WhICh has roadway dram age structures and the dIscharge mto Lot 34-C The applIcant does not mdIcate how he plans to treat thIS roadway dramage, both for the current two-lane roadway sectIon and the ultImate four-lane dIVIded roadway sectIon. 5 Quantum Lakes Dnve, from Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard, contams both water and wastewater system segments, to whIch at least one- half of the dedIcated nght-of-way will be reqUired to be utilIty easement( s) No antIcIpated permanent "park amemtIes" will be permItted on the utilIty easement(s), other than soddmg and/or SIdewalk. ThIS department will reqUire demonstratIOn that "neglIgible Impacts on the traffic dIstributIon resultmg from the roadway reconfiguratIon" SubmItted traffic analYSIS by the consultant does not meet DRI traffic performance standards. FIRE Comments, 6 Roads and hydrants must be m place pnor to any constructIon above grade. POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments. 7 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve WIll reqUire replattmg of that portIOn of Quantum Park m accordance With the reqUirements of the LDR, Chapter 5, Plattmg:. 8 Lot 34C (NotIficatIOn of a Proposed Change, SectIon 5 4) IS proposed to be changed from undesIgnated use to IndustrIal use, How wIll thIS change Impact proposed open spaces and park areas WIthm the development? 9 PrOVIde venficatIOn that Palm Beach County Engmeenng will permIt a dnveway opemng onto Mmer Road for Lot 34C Show how a second mgress and egress pomt will be prOVIded at the south end of the property for emergency servIces. 10 If approved, an envIronmental assessment of Tract 34C will be reqUired as part of any SIte submIttal. MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/04/01 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 11 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve will Isolate the dedIcated roadway easement along the north property lIne of Lot 61 The NotificatIOn of a Proposed Change, SectIOn 5.5, mdIcates access will be prOVIded VIa a smgle entrance pomt at the mtersectIon of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Quantum Boulevard. ElllnmatIOn of that portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and the second access pomt WIll create an undeSIrably long trIp for the most northerly reSIdents of the proposed multi-family reSIdential development and would create a hazardous SItuatIon for emergency servIces needmg to access northerlvportIOns of that same development. 12. Abandonment of a portIon of Quantum Lake Dnve and reconfigunng a portIon of It mto Lot 101 will create an undeSIrably long trIp for the most northerly tenants of the proposed new lot and will create a hazardous SItuatIOn for emergency servIces needmg to access northerly portIOns of that same development. 13 ReconfiguratIOn of Lots 62 and 63 mto a smgle Lot 102 would create the same SItuatIOn described m the above Paragraphs 2 and 3 for the southerly tenants of the proposed new lot. 14 The NotificatIOn of a Proposed Change, Section 5.5, paragraph 3, represents the mtersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Gateway Boulevard as substandard and dangerous. ThIS mtersectIOn has preVIously been reVIewed and approved. Please prOVIde addItional mformatIon (aCCIdent data and standard draWIngs) supportmg thIS statement. 15 If the areas MUI0l and Lot 34C are new, developable parcels then an addItIOnal recreational fee (or land m lIeu of fee) may be assessed based on the ongmal calculations for the City park. 16 The creatIOn of Lots 100 and 101 and the re-desIgnatIOn of Lot 34C from undesIgnated to IndustrIal will ObVIOusly mcrease traffic volumes. The Traffic AnalYSIS (Quantum Park NOPC #12) states that" WIll not result m an mcrease m daily or peak hour volumes" Although the analYSIS concludes that there are no mcreases m the approved daily and peak hour trIpS due to SImultaneous mcreases and decreases m allowable development mtensItIes, the analYSIS needs to further address local changes m traffic volumes that would result from the proposed changes. 17 The Traffic AnalYSIS (Quantum Park NOPC #12) acknowledges that the closure of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve has the potential to Impact the regIOnal roadway network. The analYSIS further states that dIverted traffic will cause the mtersectIOn of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard to operate over capaCIty durmg the PM peak hour The analYSIS proposes changes m strIpmg and roadway wIdemng to address thIS WIthout provIdmg a timetable. Please be more speCIfic as to how and when thIS work will be mcorporated mto the plannmg process to mmUllize Impact to the travelmg oublic. Also olease address the imoact these orooosed changes would have MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/04/0 I 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT on access by emergency vehIcles and law enforcement. 18 IdentIfy the tract shown as MUI0l as MU60A and MU61A to show each lot's addItIonal property due to the abandonment. Change MUlOO to MUI02A. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: None PARKS AND RECREA nON Comments. 19 The City CommIssIon dId exempt, from the RecreatIon DedIcatIOn ReqUirement, 272 unItS of the 1,000 unItS reqUired m the most recent master plan reVISIon. The developer dId pledge, however, to prOVIde appropnate publIc recreatIOn facilItIes for these umts. (To be determIned m conJunctIOn WIth the Parks DIVISIOn.) The total recreatIon dedIcatIOn reqUirement will be calculated as follows. 1,000 umts-272 unIts=728 D U 728 D U.x 015 =10.92 acres Y2 credIt may be gIVen agamst the reqUirement of land dedIcatIOn or payment of fees. Y2 pnvate recreatIon credIt will be calculated as follows. 10.92 acres / 2=546 acres An addItIonal 14 credIt may be gIven for natural resources agamst the reqUirement of land dedicatIOn or payment of fees. 14 credIt for natural resources will be calculated as follows. 1092 acres/4 = 2.73 acres The developer may want to conSIder dedIcatIOn of the land, or a combmatIOn of dedIcatIOn and fee 20 Natural resource credIt, If approved by the commISSIOn, IS subtracted off the RecreatIon DedIcatIOn ReqUirement. 21 Accordmg to Chapter 1, ArtIcle V SectIOn 3 of the Land Development RegulatIOn, the developer must proVIde 5 park elements m order to qualIfy for Y2 credIt for pnvate recreatIon prOVIded. 22 If the property IS not further platted, recreatIOn fees or dedIcatIons for the MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/04/01 5 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 728 non-exempt dwellIng unIts are due before the Issumg of theIr resIdentIal bUIldmg permIts. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments. 23 I am requestmg the applIcant as a condItIon to the above Master Plan ModIficatIOn to respond to my letter of May 14, 2001 (as dIrected by our CIty Manager) m reference to the Quantum Park-DRI Annual EnVIronmental Areas Status Report. 24 Lot 34-C IS shown on the Quantum Park Master Plan as a 6.58 acres detentIOn (open space) area and IS contIguous to the 25 7 acres Sand Pme Preserve, The land use change of lot 34-C from detentIon (open space) to mdustnal, could affect the enVIronmental qualIty of the contIguous Sand Pme Preserve when the mdustrIal tract IS developed by the owner 25 In December 1998 a 6-foot hIgh cham lInk fence was mstalled around 1 ) lot 34-C (6.58acres) and 2.) Water Management Tract "J" (6.16 acres) and connected to the eXIstmg fence around the penmeter of the 3) Sand Pme Preserve (25.7 acres) ThIS was to protect the envIronmental qualIty of the total of 38.44 acres In the three separate tracts, and suggest that the three tracts are all one and shown as open space / Sand Pme Preserve on the Quantum Master Plan. ThIS area should remam as open space / Sand Pme Preserve. The proJect should contmue m the normal reVIew process. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments. 26 The Land Use Acreage Table IS mcorrect as shown on page 5 of the NOPC applIcatIon. Amendment #10 was approved for 84.35 ac of (OI) and 26.33 ac. of (OlC) Correct thIS mformatIOn on the applIcatIon. I 27 The Land Use Acreage Tables on page 5 of the applIcatIOn and on the Master Plan draWing show a decrease m the (OlC) category (26.33 acres approved, 22 94 acres proposed) but the amendment does not propose a change to any (OlC) deSIgnated lots. Please explam? 28 The Land Use Acreage Table on page 5 of the applIcatIon and on the Nope Master Plan #12 draWing IS mcorrect The eXIstmg (MU) lots add up to 62,38 acres. The addItIonal (MU) lots proposed m thIS amendment add up MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/04/0 I 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT to 2682 acres. Together they total 89.20 acres not 9065 as shown on the plan. Please correct. 29 Lot 34-C IS shown as haVIng 6.58 acres m the applIcation but 6.56 acres has been added to the Industnal category on the Master Plan, The development order and Master Plan Amendments through NOPC #8 have IdentIfied thIS tract as havmg 6.59 acres, To be conSIstent, use the 6.59-acre SIte area calculation. 25 Lot 34-C has been labeled on the Master Plan as "DetentIOn" up through NOPC Master Plan Amendment #8 For some reason, the detentIOn label does not appear on NOPC Master Plans #9 or #10 even though no change to the deSIgnation of thIS lot was proposed or approved m eIther amendment. ThIS lot remams a Detention lot WIth no development deSIgnatIOn aSSIgned. Please mdIcate thIS m your applIcatIOn and proVIde data and analYSIS to support the elImmatIOn of thIS area for detentIOn. 26 PrOVIde SIte area acreage calculatIOns for proposed lots 100 and 10 1, 27 The Land use acreage Table on page 5 and on the NOPC Master Plan #12 drawmg shows a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space. Does thIS reflect the 6.59-acre DetentIOn lot (34-C) plus any open space assocIated WIth the elImmatIOn of the nght-of-way? Please clanfy 28 Lots 73-A through 76 should be hIghlIghted as commItted development. SIte Plan approval was granted on 8/7/01 ThIS should also be reflected m the proJect traffic 2002 estimate m the Pmder Troutman traffic analYSIS. 29 Lot 50-A should also be hIghlIghted as commItted development (On ana GranIte) SIte Plan approval was granted on 6/6/00 ThIS should be reflected m the proJect traffic 2001 estimate m the Pmder Troutman traffic analYSIS. 30 The Master Plan mdICates that the acreage for the IndustrIal category IS mcreasmg by 6.56 acres yet the allowable mtensIty for thIS category IS decreasing by 375, 354 square feet. Please clanfy thIS mconsIstency 31 The Master Plan mdIcates the acreage for the Office categones (0, 01) IS decreasmg; yet the allowable mtensIty for thIS category IS mcreasmg by 72, 922 square feet. Please clarIfy thIS mconsIstency 32, The Master Plan mdIcates a proposed new access from Mmer Road for Lot 34-C The traffic analYSIS must speCIfically address thIS access smce It IS not mtegrated mto the traffic CIrculation system for the rest of the Pill How many trIpS are allocated for thIS SIte and how will It IrrIpact Mmer Road? 33 The NOPC applIcation page 9 contams two converSIOn formulas for reSIdential umts. They do not appear on the Master Plan. As shown they prOVIde two dIfferent converSIOn formulas for the same use - ReSIdential Unit. What IS the pumose of these formulas? Please clarify this MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/04/0 I 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT mconsIstency or remove them from the applIcatIOn. 34 Approval of the Master Plan IS contmgent upon a findmg of no substantIal deVIatIOn by the City ThIS IS based on the followmg sectIons of the Flonda Statutes. a) Chapter 38006 (19) (b) 9 An mcrease m the number of dwellmg umts by five (5) percent of 50 unItS, whIchever IS greater b) Chapter 380 06 (19) (e) 5 c Not wIthstandmg any prOVlSlon m paragraph (b) to the contrary, a proposed change consIstmg of SImultaneous mcrease and decreases of at least two of the uses wIthm an authonzed multI-use development of regIOnal Impact whIch was ongmally approved With more than three uses speCIfied m 380 0651 (3) (c), (d), (f) and g and reSIdentIal use c) Chapter 38006 (19) (e) 5 b Except for the types of uses lIsted m subparagraph (b) 16 , any change whIch would result m the development of any area whIch was speCIfically set aSIde m the applIcatIOn for development approval or m the development order for preservatIon, buffers, or speCIal protectIOn, mcludmg habItat for plant and ammal speCIes, archeologIcal and hIstoncal SItes and other speCIal areas The applIcatIOn as presented IS presumed to be a substantIal deVIatIon, ThIS presumptIon may be rebutted by clear and convmcmg eVIdence. The applIcant must prOVIde addItIOnal mformatIOn before determmatIon of no substantIal deVIatIon IS made. The addItIonal mformatIOn must mclude: - A reVIsed traffic analYSIS based on comments receIved from Palm Beach County and the CIty of Boynton Beach TechnIcal ReVIew CommIttee - Demonstrate how the proposed change from the Office (0) and Office/IndustrIal (01) categones to the MU category IS conSIstent With the ComprehensIve Plan. - PrOVIde an updated analYSIS of the master dramage plan for Quantum Park clearly mdIcatmg the Impacts that an mdustrIal development on the current DetentIon Tract 34-C would have. - Demonstrate how a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space will be mItIgated. 35 Under the condItIon of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development Order and Chapter 3, ArtIcle IV of the Land Development RegulatIOns, a traffic analYSIS IS reqUired for thIS Master Plan approval. The applIcant submItted a traffic analYSIS. In lIeu of an mdependent traffic consultant, the staff and the Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISIon will reVIew the traffic study 36 The Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISIon has reVIewed the traffic study and demed approval due to the follOWing: a. The traffic generated by the hIgh school (about 2,283 dally trIps) should be counted as vested trIpS wIthm the overall Quantum development traffic generatIons. b Daily and peak hour trIps related to "ADA Approvals" as presented m Attachments 1 A. 1 B and 1 C. must reflect the values of the latest NOPC MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/04/0 I 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT approval. (Ref. Letter from Masoud Atefi, Palm Beach County to Michael Rumpf dated 8/20/01) Please respond to these comments and reVIse the traffic study accordmgly 37 The NOPC Master Plan submIttal dId not mclude a conceptual SIte plan or JustIficatIon for the requested change The CIty approved the MIxed-Use deSIgnatIOn when It adopted Amendment #10 m March 2000 To date, no development has been proposed WhICh combmes all the uses reqUired by the Land Development RegulatIons m the defimtIon of a MIxed Use Pod m a Pill The only plans subrmtted and approved to date are for Villas at Quantum Lake (a.k.a. Grotto Bay) 38 The Villas at Quantum Lake SIte plan was approved With an access at the north end of the SIte from Lot 61 along an easement on lot 62 to Quantum Lakes Dnve eventually leadmg out to Gateway Boulevard. The proposed Master Plan does not mdIcate thIS access. Please correct the Master Plan to reflect the approved access for the reSIdentIal proJect. 39 The owners of the Villas at Quantum Lake proJect have contacted the CIty m wntmg regardmg theIr concerns that any development on proposed lots 100 and 101, If not bUilt m coordmatIOn WIth theIr proJect, may Impact theIr access, frontage, VIsibilIty, setbacks, denSIty, open space and eXIstmg VIews. Has the applIcant contacted the adJacent property owner to dISCUSS the Impacts of thIS NOPC proposal? It IS ImperatIve that the adJacent property owners are appnsed of and be m agreement With thIS proposed change. 40 The proposed abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and the creatIon of Lots 100, 101 and 103 will reqUire a replat of that portIon of the r' Pill plat. ,.0 41 On June 25, 2001, a letter was sent to DaVId, B Noms, Counsel for the applIcant requestmg several reVISIOns to the Annual Status Report for the Quantum Park Pill DR!. To date, those reVISIons have not been made, Please reVIse the annual report accordmgly and prOVIde the reVISIOns at the September 11, 2001 TRC meetml!. 42 ReVIse the SubstantIal DeVIatIon Chart m the applIcatIOn for the Open Spaces category The chart mdIcates N/C for the proposed change when the elIrmnatIOn of the detentIon area IS proposed. Also reVIew the numbers for the IndustrIal and Office categones, as they do not match the NOPC Master Plan #12 drawmg. MWR/sc S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIQuanlum Park 2001 MPMD & DRIAIMPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PUBLIC \VORKS DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO' Mike Rumpf, DIrector of Planmng and Zonmg FROM. Jeffrey R. LIvergood, DIrector of PublIc Works DATE August 29,2001 SUBJECT Quantum NOPC #12 I have revIewed the proposed changes consIdered m NOPC #12 for Quantum Park. Quantum has requested that consIderation be gIven by the City to the closure of the eastern portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve at Gateway Boulevard. There are essentially three traffic Issues that ment evaluatIOn and scrutmy Quantum Lakes Drive Closure Staff IS of the opmIOn that Quantum Lakes Dnve can safely be closed at Gateway Boulevard, Frankly, It IS staff's opmIOn that there IS value m closmg Quantum Lakes Dnveway smce thIS would effectively elImmate a conflIct pomt on a busy artenal route (Gateway Boulevard) However, m closmg Quantum Lakes Dnve, we must be cognIzant ofthe revIsed access configurations from Lots 100 and 102 Staff recommends that these two lots only be allowed to access Gateway Boulevard m a "nght m - nght out" manner Staff would oppose any smgle lot havmg full access onto Gateway smce the dnveways m question are located on the mSIde of the curve on Gateway and SIght dIstance IS lImIted. Traffic Signalization, Quantum Drive and Gateway Boulevard Staff's reVIew of the traffic Impact at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Dnve and Gateway Boulevard IS more complex. As part of the NOPC #11 submIttal, the traffic consultant, Pmdar Troutman, opmed that a traffic sIgnal IS warranted at thIS mtersectIOn based on peak hour warrants, or Warrant 11 from the Manual on Umform Traffic Control DeVIces. WIth respect to NOPC #12, the consultant has changed the mtersectIOn lane-marking configuratIOn by elImmatmg one of two through lanes, both northbound and southbound, and substItutmg dedIcated nght turn lanes. ThIS actIon was logIcal because the assumption was made that there would be very mImmal north or southbound through movements at the mtersectIOn. Ultimately, the cntIcal volume sum that was utilIzed for level of servIce analYSIS could be reduced. Thus the mtersectIOn theoretically will have a hIgher traffic capaCIty However, whereas the cntIcallane analYSIS prOVIdes mformatIOn related to overall mtersectIOn capaCIty, It does not lend Itself to warrant analYSIS for SIgnalIzatIOn. ThIS analYSIS IS based on completely dIfferent cntena establIshed m the Manual m Umform Traffic Control DeVIces, the same Manual utilIzed by the consultant m NOPC #11 submIttal. The consultant has shown no changes m the traffic dIstributIOn, Thus, the warrant analYSIS conducted by Pmdar Troutman and summanzed m a report dated February 16, 2001 IS still valId. In fact, as lots 7 through 11 and lots 23 through 3 1 develop as MIxed Use, they will most certamly generate addItional traffic that WIll use the mtersectIon of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard. As such, the need for a traffic sIgnal at thIS mtersectIon will be even more pronounced. Staff, therefore, recommends that the developer ImmedIately have mstalled a traffic actuated SIgnal at the mtersectIon of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard, The developer should post a letter of credIt m an amount commensurate wIth the cost of sIgnal construction as a part of the approval of NO PC #12 Traffic Signalization, Quantum Drive and Congress Avenue The traffic consultant dId not evaluate traffic condItions at thIS mtersectIOn as part of the submIttal packet for NOPC #12 However, evaluatIOn of traffic condItIOns at thIS mtersectIOn IS equally as cntIcal. Agam, as part of the NOPC #11 submIttal, Pmdar Troutman evaluated traffic SIgnal warrant cntena at the mtersectIon of Quantum Dnve and Gateway Boulevard. In thIS analysIs, Pmdar Troutman found that a traffic SIgnal was not presently warranted at thIS mtersectIOn based on the peak hour warrant and noted that "there are other Warrants, No 2- InterruptIOn of Contmuous Traffic and No 10 - Peak Hour Delay that may be satisfied. The recommendation IS that thIS mtersectIOn be momtored m the future. Appropnate time frames for momtonng would be at the buildout of Lots 32 through 38 and at the buildout of the NOPC 11 reSIdential or non-resIdentIalland uses, whIchever occurs first." Staff would note that a large portIon oflots 32 through 38 are now complete m the form of the PremIer buildmg. Furthermore, as part of Pmdar Troutman's traffic analYSIS m February of 200 1, the consultant assumed a build out of Lots 23 to 31 as office space (0) and Lots 7 to 11 as Office/IndustrIal (0/1) However, the proposal IS to now change these land uses to MIxed Use (MU) The developer contmues to be bound by a maXImum number of daily trIps from the entIre DR!, yet subtle changes m land use can SIgnIficantly Impact peak hour traffic flows WIthout Impactmg the daily trIp generatIOn rate The consultant has not expressed an opmIOn on the changed traffic charactenstIcs as related to traffic SIgnal warrant analYSIS based on the changes to mIxed use Staffbeheves that the developer should be reqUired to post a letter of credIt as well for the mstallatIon of a traffic-actuated SIgnal at the mtersectIon of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Avenue It IS very likely that a SIgnal will be warranted upon build out of the proposed mIxed use land uses. If the CIty does not obtam surety for the mstallatIOn of a traffic SIgnal at thIS time, It will be VIrtually Impossible to assess the reqUirement for traffic SIgnal construction to each mdIVIdual that may purchase the mIxed use lots from Quantum and then subsequently develop them. The burden of traffic SIgnal constructIOn should fall upon the developer of the whole rather than the mdIvIduals that choose to acqUire and develop lots m the future Quantum could easily dIstribute the cost equally to future buyers whereas the City could not. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORAi'\TDUM TO- Mike Rumpf, DIrector of Plannmg and Zomng FROM. Jeffrey R. LIvergood, DIrector of PublIc Works DATE August 29,2001 SUBJECT Quantum NOPC #12 I have revIewed the proposed changes consIdered m NOPC #12 for Quantum Park. Quantum has requested that consIderatIOn be gIVen by the CIty to the closure of the eastern portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve at Gateway Boulevard. There are essentially three traffic Issues that ment evaluation and scrutmy Quantum Lakes Drive Closure Staff IS of the opImon that Quantum Lakes Dnve can safely be closed at Gateway Boulevard. Frankly, It IS staffs opmIOn that there IS value m closmg Quantum Lakes Dnveway smce thIS would effectively elImmate a conflIct pomt on a busy artenal route (Gateway Boulevard) However, m closmg Quantum Lakes DrIve, we must be cognIzant of the reVIsed access configurations from Lots 100 and 102 Staff recommends that these two lots only be allowed to access Gateway Boulevard m a "nght m - nght out" manner Staff would oppose any smgle lot havmg full access onto Gateway smce the dnveways m question are located on the mSIde of the curve on Gateway and SIght dIstance IS lImIted. Traffic Signalization, Quantum Drive and Gateway Boulevard Staff S reVIew of the traffic Impact at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Dnve and Gateway Boulevard IS more complex. As part of NO PC #11 submIttal, the traffic consultant, Pmdar Troutman, opmed that a traffic sIgnal IS warranted at thIS mtersectIon based on peak hour warrants, or Warrant 11 from the Manual on Umform Traffic Control DeVIces. With respect to NOPC #12, the consultant has changed the mtersectIOn lane-marking configuration by elImmatIng one of two through lanes both northbound and southbound and substItutmg dedIcated nght turn lanes. ThIS actIon was logIcal because the assumption was made that there would be very mImmal north or southbound through movements at the mtersectIOn. UltImately, the cntIcal volume analYSIS that was utilIzed for level of servIce analYSIS could be reduced, Thus the mtersectIOn theoretically WIll have a hIgher traffic capaCIty However, whereas the cntIcallane analYSIS prOVides mformatIon related to overall mtersectIOn capaCIty, It does not lend Itself to warrant analYSIS for SIgnalIzatIOn. ThIS analYSIS IS based on completely dIfferent cntena establIshed m the Manual m Umform Traffic Control DeVices, the same Manual utilIzed by the consultant m NOpe #11 submIttal. The consultant has shown no changes m the traffic dIstribution. Thus, the warrant analYSIS conducted by Pmdar Troutman and summanzed m a report dated February 16, 2001 IS still valId. In fact, as lots 7 through 11 and lots 23 through 31 develop as Mixed Use, they will most certamly generate addItional traffic that will use the mtersectIOn of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard. As such, the need for a traffic sIgnal at thIS mtersectIon will be even more pronounced. Staff, therefore, recommends that the developer ImmedIately have mstalled at traffic actuated SIgnal at the mtersectIon of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard, The developer should post a letter of credIt m an amount commensurate wIth the cost of SIgnal constructIOn as a part of the approval of NO PC #12. Traffic Signalization, Quantum Drive and Congress Avenue The traffic consultant dId not evaluate traffic condItions as part of the submIttal packet for NOPC #12 However, evaluation of traffic condItIOns at thIS mtersectIOn IS equally as cntIcal. Agam, as part of the NOPC #11 submIttal, Pmdar Troutman evaluated traffic SIgnal warrant cntena at the mtersectIon of Quantum Dnve and Gateway Boulevard. In thIS analYSIS, Pmdar Troutman found that a traffic SIgnal was not presently warranted at thIS mtersectIOn based on the peak hour warrant and noted that "there are other Warrants, No 2 - InterruptIOn of Contmuous Traffic and No 10 - Peak Hour Delay that may be satIsfied. The recommendatIOn IS that thIS mtersectIon be momtored m the future, Appropnate time frames for momtonng would be at the buildout of Lots 32 through 38 and at the buildout of the NOPC 11 reSIdential or non-resIdential land uses, whIchever occurs first." Staff would note that a large portIOn of lots 32 through 38 are now complete m the form of the PremIer buildmg. Furthermore, as part ofPmdar Troutman's traffic analYSIS m February of2001, the consultant assumed a build out of Lots 23 to 31 as office space (0) and Lots 7 to 11 as Office/IndustrIal (0/1) However, the proposal IS to now change these land uses to MIxed Use (MU) The developer contmues to be bound by a maXImum number of dally trIps from the entire DR!, yet subtle changes m land use can SIgnIficantly Impact peak hour traffic flows WIthout Impactmg the daily trIp generation rate The consultant has not expressed an opImon on the changed traffic charactenstIcs as related to traffic SIgnal warrant analYSIS based on the changes to mIxed use Staffbeheves that the developer should be reqUired to post a letter of credIt as well for the mstallatIOn of a traffic-actuated SIgnal at the mtersectIon of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Avenue It IS very likely that a SIgnal will be warranted upon build out of the proposed mIxed use land uses. If the CIty does not obtam surety for the mstallatIon of a traffic SIgnal at thIS time, It will be VIrtually Impossible to assess the reqUirement for traffic SIgnal construction to each mdIvIdual that may purchase the mIxed use lots from Quantum and then subsequently develop them. The burden of traffic SIgnal construction should fall upon the developer of the whole rather than the mdIVIduals that choose to acqUire and develop lots m the future Quantum could easily dIstribute the cost equally to future buyers whereas the CIty could not. FACSIMILE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH City Hall, West Wing 1 00 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. POBox 31 0 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 (561) 742-6260 (561) 742-6259 Fax From the office of Planning & Zoning TO 1\ J )jIf: D> I '^-4 rei ~' ~ c:x Luu c<- st/ Jav jJ FAX. 6)./ I FROM DA TE. 8/20)0/ t NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover) 2 RE. 9#- lUAJ"'",dc, 's (lC/>yJ~1lJ I!&~ czu. <I-a ciw (lu~ ~~~- c1~~u- If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT L TIME 08/30/2001 14 55 NAME BOVNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613756259 TEL 5613756260 DATE,TIME FA?< NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 08/30 14 54 6211 00 01 10 02 OV STANDARD CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH Department of Engineering Engineering Services Division August 30, 2001 TO Lusia Galav, Senior Planner FROM Laurinda Logan, P E , Civil Engineer I , ' RE Quantum Park NOpe #12 File No. MPMD 01-003 Thanks for the opportunity to comment on Jeff Livergood's draft comments on the above referenced project. /" f-, 'r/ ~~1u\ Y\ rb\v' ~~ . Public Works states that they have no objection to the closure of Quantum Lakes Dr from Quantum Blvd to Gateway Blvd They do recommend that access be allowed to proposed Lots 100 and 101 via a "right in - right out" driveway configuration However, as I stated in my comments regarding NOPC #12, I believe the closure of this portion of Quantum Lakes Dr will have a significant impact on emergency vehicle access to both Lots 100 and 101 and on Lots 59,60, 61 and proposed Lot 102 . Engineering agrees with the comments provided on the intersection of Quantum Blvd and Gateway Blvd - in particular the consultant's minimization of the effects the re-categorization of land uses will have on traffic counts and makeup Signalization of this intersection will have a positive impact on overall safety for Gateway Blvd and Quantum Blvd . With regards to signalizing the intersection of Quantum Blvd and Congress Ave, my only concern is the proximity of this intersection to the Gateway Blvd.lCongress Ave intersection . Public Works did not address the effect the proposed changes will have on safety (emergency vehicles) and convenience Second access points will lost for most of the proposed lot changes Although not required by the City of Boynton beach Code or Land Development Regulations, NFPA 1141,4-1 2 requires two separate means of ingress/egress for planned building groups . Public Works did not address the consultant's representation of the east intersection of Quantum Lakes Dr and Gateway Blvd as substandard and dangerous (Notification of a Proposed Chanqe, Section 5 5, paragraph 3) Does Public Works agree or disagree with this statement? t..f2:. -:;..- r\,.\ LiJvl'vwlK \}.f" '1'1" \.,,.. \i;>>i.'tJ J-. .,,~ 'V'~O'~ Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to sit down to discuss this further America's Gateway to the Gulfstream 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O, Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6480 Fax: (561) 742-6285 \\CH\MAIl'\SHRDATA\Engineering\Logan\Quantum Park\Comments on Public Works Memo,doc DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES MEMORANDUM NO 01-220 TO MIchael W Rumpf, ~ of PlannIng and Zomng THRU ~John A. GUIdry , UtIlItIes DIrector FROM H, DaVId Kelley, Jr , PE/PSM, ~ CIVIllUtIlIty Engmeer DATE August 31, 2001 RE QUANTUM PARK NOPC #12 (Quantum Park at Gateway Boulevard) MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION MPMD 01-003 - 1 st REVIEW ThIS department has revIewed above noted DRI project NotIficatIon of Proposed Changed No 12, receIved on August 15th, and we offer the followmg comments related to thIS Issue 1 Lots 7 thru 11, and Lots 23 thru 31, located on Quantum Boulevard (a total of 14 lots) were the subject of Quantum Park Amendment #11 (MPMD 00-007) to WhICh we responded to m UtIlItIes Department Memorandum #01-012, dated January 11, 2001 To recapItulate those comments, we stated that WIth the ongmal DRI for the total park desIgned for CommercIal, Industnal, Office, or a combmatIon of Office and Industnal, and/or Office, Industnal and Commercial, both the water and wastewater systems to support these type of uses was deSIgned and constructed for those antIcIpated uses. Four (4) 11ft statIOns were configured to handle the wastewater generatIon antIcIpated m the 550 acre park. As prevIOusly stated, the proposed reVlSlon to the land use to "Mixed Use (MU)" to mclude Office, Commercial and ReSIdentIal uses could tax the utIlIty support faCIlItIes to theIr lImIts. A prOVISO needs to be mcorporated mto each group of lot approvals process, that the deSIgn engmeenng consultant shall demonstrate that suffiCIent utIlIty system(s) capaCIty IS aVailable to support the proposed use, or they WIll prOVIde the necessary upgrade(s) to allow for the proposed use, Failure to do so could result m msufficIent utIlIty support to thIS park, effectmg other current (exIstmg) users. 2. ApplIcant IS requestmg that Lot 34-C be converted to Industnal usage. In lIeu that Lot 34-C was open space deSIgnated for dry retentIon (as an overflow from Tract "J"), applIcant IS reqUIred to demonstrate that the dry retentIOn area of thIS lot IS no longer needed, or to WhICh lot/tract dId the dry retentIOn reqUIrement get transferred. The partIal letter from SFWMD (unsIgned) does not mdIcate that the dry retentIon of Lot 34-C IS no longer reqUIred, nor has the "As-BUIlt Master Dramage Plan" from the engmeer-of-record ROSSI and MalavasI Engmeers, Inc, ever been submItted to the CIty It WIll be reqUired to submIt the back-up documentatIOn to substantIate that the applIcant's request for land use converSIOn. ThIS lot IS also at the low pomt along Miner Road WhICh has roadway dramage structures and the dIscharge mto Lot 34-C The applIcant does not mdIcate how he plans to treat thIS roadway dramage, both for the current two-lane roadway sectIOn and the ultImate four-lane dIvIded roadway sectIon. 3 Quantum Lakes Dnve, from Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard, contams both water and wastewater system segments, to WhICh at least one-half of the dedIcated nght-of-wav WIll be reqUired to be utIlIty easement(s) No antIcIpated permanent "park amemtIes" WIll be permItted on the utIlIty easement(s), other than soddmg and/or SIdewalk. ThIS department WIll reqUire demonstratIOn that "neglIgible Impacts on the traffic dIstributIOn resultmg from the roadway reconfiguratIOn" SubmItted traffic analysIs by the consultant does not meet DR! traffic performance standards SpeCIfic comments to utIlIty Issues WIll depend upon the applIcant's response to these concerns. We WIll contmue to mom tor any other plan changes to determme theIr effect on the supportmg utIlIty systems currently m place xc Georganne Barden FIle S.\Engineering\Dosta]\Quantum Park NOPC #]2 Utility Comments.doc CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd PO Box310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 ~~ R rp~rs-n \~ ~ ~ \ ~ I ( :;t2-3:",-> W ~uL \ PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS For review of' MPMD 01-003 1st review-fire Project Name or Address Quantum Park NOPC #12 Quantum Park at Gateway Blvd. Reviewed by' 4~- Rodger Kemmer. Fire Plans Examiner/Fire Inspector Department: Fire and Life Safety Trade Fire Department Phone (561) 742-6753 Comments to Sherie Coale by email on 8/23//01 CODE REQUIREMENTS Compliance with NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, NFPA 1, Fire Prevention Code, and city ordinances is required 1 Roads and hydrants must be in place prior to any construction above grade cc S Hale, Fire Marshal B Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal Coale, Sherie From Sent: To Subject: Prestinari, Jim Friday August 31 2001 558 PM Coale, Sherie RE Quantum Park NOPC #12 MPMD 01-003 1st Review Comments Sherie The PD has no issue with NOPC #12 MPMD 01-003 The plans have been forwarded to your office -----Original Message----- From Coale, Sherie Sent: Friday August 31 2001 09'35 AM To Prestinari, Jim Cc. Galav Lusia Subject: Quantum Park NOPC #12 MPMD 01-003 1st Review Comments Please forward your comments about this project to Lusia or me by noon today If I do not receive anything from you by that time I will consider your comments to be "none" Thank You 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 01-163 TO Michael W Rumpf, DIrector ofPlannmg and Zomng FROM. Launnda Logan, P.E., elVll EngIneer { ~. August 29,2001 ",--J DATE RE Quantum Park NOpe #12 (Quantum Park at Gateway Boulevard) Master Plan Modification - 1st Review File No. MPMD 01-003 I have revIewed the above referenced SIte Plan, receIved on August 15, 2001 Followmg are my comments, wIth the appropnate Code and Land Development RegulatIOns (LDR) referenced as appropnate. As thIS IS for a major modIficatIon only, the plans were not revIewed agamst the SIte Plan ReVIew reqUirements m the Land Development RegulatIons. 1 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve wIll reqUire replattmg of that portIOn of Quantum Park m accordance wIth the reqUirements ofthe LDR, Chapter 5, Plattmg. 2 Lot 34C (NotIficatIOn of a Proposed Change, SectIOn 54) IS proposed to be changed from undesIgnated use to Industnal use How wIll thIS change Impact proposed open spaces and park areas wIthm the development? 3 PrOVIde venficatIOn that Palm Beach County Engmeenng wIll permIt a dnveway opemng onto Miner Road for Lot 34C Show how a second mgress and egress pomt wIll be prOVIded at the south end of the property for emergency servIces. 4 If approved, an envIronmental assessment of Tract 34C wIll be reqUired as part of any sIte submIttal. 5 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve WIll Isolate the dedIcated roadway easement along the north property hne of Lot 61 The NotIficatIOn of a Proposed Change, SectIon 5.5, mdIcates access wIll be proVIded VIa a smgle entrance pomt at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Quantum Boulevard. EhmmatIon of that portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and the second access pomt wIll create an undesIrably long tnp for the most northerly reSIdents of the proposed multI-famIly reSIdentIal development and would create a hazardous sItuatIOn for emergency servIces needmg to access northerly portIOns of that same development. 6 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve and reconfigunng a portIOn of It mto Lot 101 wIll create an undesIrably long tnp for the most northerly tenants of the proposed new lot and WIll create a hazardous SItuatIon for emergency servIces needmg to access northerly portIOns of that same development. 7 ReconfiguratIOn of Lots 62 and 63 mto a smgle Lot 102 would create the same SItuatIOn described m the above Paragraphs 2 and 3 for the southerly tenants of the proposed new lot. Engmeenng Department Memorandum No 01-163 Re Quantum Park NOPC #12 - Engmeenng. 1 sl RevIew Comments August 29,2001 Page Two 8 The NotificatIOn of a Proposed Change, SectIOn 5.5, paragraph 3, represents the mtersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Gateway Boulevard as substandard and dangerous. ThIS mtersectIon has prevIously been reVIewed and approved, Please provIde addItIOnal mformatIOn (accIdent data and standard drawmgs) supportmg thIS statement. 9 If the areas MUI0l and Lot 34C are new, developable parcels then an addItional recreatIOnal fee (or land m lIeu of fee) may be assessed based on the ongmal calculatIOns for the CIty park. 10 The creation of Lots 100 and 101 and the re-desIgnatIOn of Lot 34C from undesIgnated to Industnal wIll ObVIOusly mcrease traffic volumes, The Traffic AnalYSIS (Quantum Park NOPC #12) states that" wIll not result m an mcrease m daily or peak hour volumes" Although the analYSIS concludes that there are no mcreases m the approved dally and peak hour tnps due to SImultaneous mcreases and decreases m allowable development mtensItIes, the analYSIS needs to further address local changes m traffic volumes that would result from the proposed changes, 11 The Traffic AnalYSIS (Quantum Park NOPC #12) acknowledges that the closure of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve has the potential to Impact the regIOnal roadway network. The analYSIS further states that dIverted traffic WIll cause the mtersectIon of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard to operate over capaCIty dunng the PM peak hour The analysIs proposes changes m stnpmg and roadway wIdenmg to address thIS WIthout provIdmg a timetable Please be more speCIfic as to how and when thIS work wIll be mcorporated mto the planmng process to mImmIze Impact to the travelmg publIc Also please address the Impact these proposed changes would have on access by emergency vehIcles and law enforcement. 12 Identify the tract shown as MUI0l as MU60A and MU61A to show each 101's addItIOnal property due to the abandonment. Change MUl 00 to MUI02A. LUck Xc H. DaVId Kelley, P.E./P S,M., UtilIty Engmeer Ken Hall, Engmeenng Plans Analyst FIle C:\My Documents\Quantum Park J>:OPC #12, Engr 1 st review,doc DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 01-180 TO MIchael Rumpf, Planmng & Zomng DIrector Don Johnson, Bmldmg Official ~ August 22, 2001 FROM DATE RE Quantum Park NOpe # 12 (MPMD 01-003) - 1st review-Master Plan Modification The BUIldmg DIVISIon has no concerns wIth the approval of Master Plan ModIficatIOn MPMD 01-003 DJ:rs XC TImothy K. Large, BUIldmg Code AdmmIstrator S:\Development\Building Div\Documents\TRC\MPMD 01-003 1st review Quantum Park NOPC #12,doc TO THRU FROM CC RE. Date PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #01-83 Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning John Wildner, Parks Director 4tJ Barbara J Meacham, Parks &~ndscape Planner ~ .___ :~~an:::VNOPC #12 i[~~':; aU 2:1 @-/OOI August 22, 2001 I r'rr','--~-'-"'--~- -. I . The Parks Department has reviewed the Masterplan for Quantum NOPC #12, and submits the following comments 1 ) The City Commission did exempt, from the Recreation Dedication Requirement, 272 units of the 1,000 units required in the most recent master plan revision The developer did pledge, however, to provide appropriate public recreation facilities for these units. (To be determined in conjunction with the Parks Division) The total recreation dedication requirement will be calculated as follows 1,000 units - 272 units = 728 D U 728 DUX 015 acres = 10 92 acres '12 credit may be given against the requirement of land dedication or payment of fees. V2 private recreation credit will be calculated as follows 10 92 acres / 2 = 546 acres An additional V4 credit may be given for natural resources against the requirement of land dedication or payment of fees. V4 credit for natural resources will be calculated as follows 10 92 acres / 4 = 2 73 acres The Developer may want to consider dedication of the land, or a combination of dedication and fee 2 ) Natural resource credit, if approved by the commission, is subtracted off the Recreation Dedication Requirement. 3 ) According to Chapter 1, Article V Section 3 of the Land Development Regulations, the developer must provide 5 park elements in order to qualify for V2 credit for private recreation provided 4 ) If the property is not further platted, recreation fees or dedications for the 728 non-exempt dwelling units are due before the issuing of their residential building permits. Plannin2 Memorandum. Forester / Environmentalist To LusIa Galav, PnncIpal Planner From. Kevm J Hallahan, Forester / EnvIronmentalIst Subject. Quantum Park NOPC #12 MPMD # 01-003 15t RevIew Date' August 23,2001 MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION COMMENTS. 1 I am requestmg the applIcant as a condItIOn to the above Master Plan ModIficatIOn to respond to my letter of May 14, 2001 (as dIrected by our CIty Manager) m reference to the Quantum Park-DR! Annual EnvIronmental Areas Status Report, 2 Lot 34-C IS shown on the Quantum Park Master Plan as a 658 acres detentIOn (open space) area and IS contiguous to the 25 7 acres Sand Pme Preserve. The land use change of lot 34-C from detention (open space) to mdustnal, could affect the envIronmental qualIty of the contiguous Sand Pme Preserve when the mdustnal tract IS developed by the owner 3 In December 1998 a 6-foot hIgh cham Imk fence was mstalled around 1 ) lot 34-C (6.58acres) and 2) Water Management Tract "J" (6.16 acres) and connected to the eXIstmg fence around the penmeter of the 3 ) Sand Pme Preserve (25. 7 acres) ThIS was to protect the envIronmental qualIty of the total of 38.44 acres m the three separate tracts, and suggest that the three tracts are all one and shown as open space / Sand Pme Preserve on the Quantum Master Plan. ThIS area should remam as open space / Sand Pme Preserve The project should contmue m the normal reVIew process. Kjh File A revised traffic analysis based on comments received from Palm Beach County and the City of Boynton Beach Technical Review Committee Demonstrate how the proposed change from the Office (0) and Office/Industrial (01) categories to the MU category is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Provide an updated analysis of the master drainage plan for Quantum Park clearly indicating the impacts that an industrial development on the current Detention Tract 34-C would have Demonstrate how a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space will be mitigated 15 Under the condition of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development Order and Chapter 3, Article IV of the Land Development Regulations, a traffic analysis is required for this Master Plan approval The applicant submitted a traffic analysis In lieu of an independent traffic consultant, the staff and the Palm Beach County Traffic Division study will review the traffic study 16 The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic study and denied approval due to the following a The traffic generated by the high school (about 2,283 daily trips) should be counted as vested trips within the overall Quantum development traffic generations b Daily and peak hour trips related to "ADA Approvals" as presented in Attachments 1 A, 1 Band 1 C, must reflect the values of the latest NOPC approval (Ref Letter from Masoud Atefi, Palm Beach County to Michael Rumpf dated 8/20/01) Please respond to these comments and revise the traffic study accordingly 17 The NOPC Master Plan submittal did not include a conceptual site plan or justification for the requested change The city approved the Mixed-Use designation when it adopted Amendment #10 in March 2000 To date, no development has been proposed which combines all the uses required by the Land Development Regulations in the definition of a Mixed Use Pod I a PID The only plans submitted and approved to date are for Villas at Quantum Lake (a k.a Grotto Bay) 18 The Villas at Quantum Lake site plan was approved with an access at the north end of the site from Lot 61 along an easement on lot 62 to Quantum Lakes Drive eventually leading out to Gateway Boulevard The proposed Master Plan does not indicate this access Please correct the Master Plan to reflect the approved access for the residential project. 19 The owners of the Villas at Quantum Lake project have contacted the city in writing regarding their concerns that any development on proposed lots 100 and 101, if not built in coordination with their project, may impact their access, frontage, visibility, setbacks, density, open space and existing views Has the applicant contacted the adjacent property owner to discuss the impacts of this NOPC proposal? It is imperative that the adjacent property owners are apprised of and be in agreement with this proposed change 20 The proposed abandonment of a portion of Quantum Lakes Drive and the creation of Lots 100, 101 and 103 will require a replat of that portion of the PID plat. 21 On June 25, 2001, a letter was sent to David, B Norris, Counsel for the applicant requesting several revisions to the Annual Status Report for the Quantum Park PID DRI To date, those revisions have not been made Please revise the annual report accordingly and provide the revisions at the September 11, TRC meeting 22 Revise the Substantial Deviation Chart in the application for the Open Spaces category The chart indicates N/C for the proposed change when the elimination of the detention area is proposed Also review the numbers for the Industrial and Office categories, as they do not match the NOPC Master Plan #12 drawing NOPC Amendment #12 - MPMD 01-003 P&Z Comments 1 The Land Use Acreage Table is incorrect as shown on page 5 of the NOPC application Amendment #10 was approved for 84.35 ac of (01) and 26.33 ac. of (OIC) Correct this information on the application 2 The Land Use Acreage Tables on page 5 of the application and on the Master Plan drawing show a decrease in the (OIC) category (26 33 acres approved, 22 94 acres proposed) but the amendment does not propose a change to any (OIC) designated lots Please explain? 3 The Land Use Acreage Table on page 5 of the application and on the NOPC Master Plan #12 drawing is incorrect The existing (MU) lots add up to 62 38 acres The additional (MU) lots proposed in this amendment add up to 2682 acres Together they total 89.20 acres not 9065 as shown on the plan Please correct. 4 Lot 34-C is shown as having 6 58 acres in the application but 6 56 acres has been added to the Industrial category on the Master Plan The development order and Master Plan Amendments through NOPC #8 have identified this tract as having 659 acres To be consistent, use the 659 acre site area calculation 5 Lot 34-C has been labeled on the Master Plan as "Detention" up through NOPC Master Plan Amendment #8 For some reason, the detention label does not appear on NOPC Master Plans #9 or #10 even though no change to the designation of this lot was proposed or approved in either amendment. This lot remains a Detention lot with no development designation assigned Please indicate this in your application and provide data and analysis to support the elimination of this area for detention 6 Provide site area acreage calculations for proposed lots 100 and 101, 7 The Land use acreage Table on page 5 and on the NOPC Master Plan #12 drawing shows a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space Does this reflect the 6 59 acre Detention lot (34-C) plus any open space associated with the elimination of the right-of-way? Please clarify 8 Lots 73-A through 76 should be highlighted as committed development. Site Plan approval was granted on 8/7/01 This should also be reflected in the project traffic 2002 estimate in the Pinder Troutman traffic analysis 9 Lot 50-A should also be highlighted as committed development (Oriana Granite) Site Plan approval was granted on 6/6/00 This should be reflected in the project traffic 2001 estimate in the Pinder Troutman traffic analysis 10 The Master Plan indicates that the acreage for the Industrial category is increasing by 6 56 acres yet the allowable intensity for this category is decreasing by 375, 354 square feet. Please clarify this inconsistency 11 The Master Plan indicates the acreage for the Office categories (0, 01) is decreasing, yet the allowable intensity for this category is increasing by 72, 922 square feet. Please clarify this inconsistency 12 The Master Plan indicates a proposed new access from Miner Road for Lot 34-C The traffic analysis must specifically address this access since it is not integrated into the traffic circulation system for the rest of the PIO How many trips are allocated for this site and how will it impact Miner Road? 13 The NOPC application page 9 contains two conversion formulas for residential units They do not appear on the Master Plan As shown they provide two different conversion formulas for the same use - Residential Unit. What is the purpose of these formulas? Please clarify this inconsistency or remove them from the application 14 Approval of the Master Plan is contingent upon a finding of no substantial deviation by the City This is based on the following sections of the Florida Statutes a) Chapter 380 06 (19) (b) 9 An increase in the number of dwelling units by five (5) percent of 50 units, whichever is greater b) Chapter 380 06 (19) (e) 5 c. Not withstanding any provision in paragraph (b) to the contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous increase and decreases of at least two of the uses within an authorized multi-use development of regional impact which was originally approved with more than three uses specified in 3800651 (3) (c), (d), (f) and g and residential use c) Chapter 38006 (19) (e) 5 b Except for the types of uses listed in subparagraph (b) 16 , any change which would result in the development of any area which was specifically set aside in the application for development approval or in the development order for preservation, buffers, or special protection, including habitat for plant and animal species, archeological and historical sites and other special areas The application as presented is presumed to be a substantial deviation This presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence The applicant must provide additional information before determination of no substantial deviation is made The additional information must include .h2san, laurinda ... From Sent: To Cc. Subject: Hall, Ken Wednesday August 29 2001 10'51 AM Gale Steven Logan Laurinda, Kelley David Galav, Lusia, Greene Quintus RE. secondary access or emergency access to a site or development Steve Thanks for the information which I copied to Ms. Logan our new civil engineer and Lusia. I guess the next question is should the city incorporate a requirement for secondary(emergency) entrances in our codes? Ken Hall -----Original Message----- From Pavlik, Joanne On Behalf Of Gale, Steven Sent: Wednesday August 29 2001 8.20 AM To Hall, Ken Subject: RE. secondary access or emergency access to a site or development If it is a planned budding group, then NFPA 1141,4-12 requires two separate means of ingress/egress Rodger Kemmer can provide you with additional If you need it Steve Gale -Original Message----- From: Hall, Ken Sent: Tuesday August 28, 2001 1'03 PM To: Logan, Laurinda Cc: Kelley David; Gale, Steven, Greene, Quintus Subject: secondary access or emergency access to a site or development Attached are all the code references I could find pertaining somewhat to having a second entrance to a development. I checked with fire and they have no specific code for emergency access Engineering fire and the development department should implement a code requirement that addresses this issue. << File emergency access codes.doc >> Ken Hall 1 e)UfI/IJi ~M. ----------.. Lor 31 c!- ~ Ja&! ~ D~lLhu; };LfG t;n 9! Ak-hm 3l/ C!. &,5( :; ,.J/}1erclfY/~pf..J 0 lJ/he1d~ .# 7 !he-v d JJ:ed- .:tit' J).ekfL-fz ~ 3L/C. ~,~t )J?1&1- f}1~tc/- f/- f ~ L J'fe. I ~ /1 ({ 'H"/'" ClC-ft~ IhdLu~d' /J1 bf~n fX'~ carcn .~. C/.\~Y 01>- r ; , ,).--, ,/' {~ ' .' ~, , , i \11 ' . :. :r o " J- >-~' ,~~O~ DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELCPMENT 'al COpy PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION . Bui/ding . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment June 25, 2001 DaVld B Noms Cohen, Noms, Scherer, Wemberger & Wolmer 712 U S HIghway One, SUIte 400 POBox 13146 North Palm Beach, Flonda 33408-7146 Re Quantum Park - Annual Status Report - 2001 Dear Mr Norris I have reviewed the Quantum Park Annual Status Report and have the followmg comments 1 Question 1 b of the Annual Report was not adequately addressed. Quantum Park applied for an amendment to the DR! m December 2000 The CIty CommIssion on February 20, 2001 failed to pass the NOPC Amendment # 11 request on fIrst readmg. Please proVlde a narrative response in the report regardmg thIS request. 2 ExhibIt A-2 is rmsleadmg, and should be ormtted from the report. The report offers no explanation for these letters from DCA and TCRPC whIch were m response to NOPC Amendment # 11 whIch was demed by the CIty CorrumssIOn 3 Please amend ExhibIt E of the Annual Report to include the following proposed developments that have received SIte pIan approval from the CIty CommissIOn dunng this reportIng penod. Lot 50A - Onana GranIte (Industnal Warehouse) Approved 6/6/00 Lot SOB - Gale Industries (Distribution/ Warehouse) Approved 11/8/00 Lot 21 & 21B - Quantum Ltd. Partners (OffIce) Approved 9/19/00 City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6350 . www.cLboynton-beach.f1.us David B Noms June 25, 2001 Page 2 Please amend the report as noted and proVIde revIsed copIes to all pa.rb.es on the ongInal dIstributIOn hst. Thank you for your cooperation m this matter Smcerely, ~!A 4Juv' Lusia Galav, AICP Pnnclpal Planner Cc. Jim Cheroff, CIty Attomey Kurt Bressner, CIty Manager Qumtus Greene, DIrector of Development MIchael Rumpf, DIrector of Planning and Zoning DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO PZ 01-168 TO TRC MEMBERS Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist James Predtinari Police Department H David Kelley Jr Utilities Department Timothy K. Large, Building Division Ken Hall, (Engineering) Public Works-General Jeffery Livergood, Public Works-Traffic Barbara Meacham, Parks Division Laurinda Logan, Engineering Department Lusia Galav, Planning Department FROM Michael W Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning DATE. August 15,2001 RE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1 ST Review - Master Plan Modification Project - Quantum Park NOPC #12 Location - Quantum Park at Gateway Blvd Agent - Eugene Gerlica, P E. File No - MPMD 01-003 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments Comments should also be made available at 5 \Planning\Shared or e-mail to Sherie Coale and I no later than 5.00 P.M. on, AUQust 24, 2001. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories, code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval 1 Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments 2 The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Lusia Galav, or myself 3 Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents, 4 Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with Page 2 other departmental improvements 5 When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified 6 If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time frame stated above, to me The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to Sherie Coale and I for distribution to the applicant. Additionally, the comments should be made available at S \ Planning\Shared Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e-mail Lusia Galav will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC) members MWR.lg Attachment XC Steve Gale, Fire Marshal Marshall Gage, Police Department John Guidry, Utilities Director To Be Determined,Director of Engineering Don Johnson, Building Division Central File S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIFORMSITemplates and formslTRC Memo for 1st Plans Review .doc Revised 5-22-01 Q;0dD.Nt f?tf~d- PRE-APPLICATION MEETING LOG Meeting Date. "' /~161 PURPOSE OF APPLICATION Time: 2 I () 0 f.vl o Lbehc'h [)t~ ^()ccl A b2\t1JgnHu7~-+ - 4Jl21Cbj,~ t..,:b/j)a, ZONE lD PRO~T NAME O~/F (j)U IhvTV..0t n {,'-''- Attending Staff: Sill qALAV; Attending for Applicant: Phone: Name of Owner. ONE ~'fu...e.. Fax. Address Phone: Name of Applicant/Contact. Fax. Address Phone Fax. PROJECT ADDRESS Phone. TYPE OF APPLICATION TYPE OF BUSINESS Date Submittal Received Date Denied COMMENTS I I ---VJ c IF;.2 (f'ICYOVCV (UJ 5~ I3a 1.&..0 --::=== I:21Jv.llt ( 'l.1 a. IformslPre-Application f\keting Log,doc t~:ur ~-~ 0 (/I Lf/U2tl1v,).// lRvPbJcv ~:~ J:L PRE-APPLICATION MEETING SIGN IN SHEET PLEASE PRINT ~/:2'1/0( MEETING DATE TIME ;) 00 fiA ATTENDING FOR APPLICANT ~ NOTICE The purpose of this conference shall be for the staff and applicant to discuss overall community goals, objectives, policies, and codes as related to the proposed development and to discuss site plan review procedures. Opinions expressed at the pre-application conference are not binding for formal review purposes. Additional staff comments may be forth coming based on actual plans submitted for review City of Boynton Beach Attendin Staff Attending for Applicant ... /1 lVUc,{t-/Q~ PRE-APPLICATION MEETING LOG Meeting Date: " /,25"/0 I PURPOSE OF APPLICATION/ ).; J ;/ (! if / 1- ZONE P/D PROJECT NAME QlJ}-tP"(1;-</1 f /:+I2-L Attending Staff:;1t 61lLAl/ Attending for Applicant: 2-.D fJl.)t ILK.. Phone u-Mt,lJ/ I- 5:~1 1-'-/D "),'-1'-/7 ()U::-^,- q~'i- ,3'-/0-' '-No Name of Owner- Q iJ/tNT/)A--1 J-1A-1r~ U (-1Jt -nJ[1l.{ Time: ;2,'Jro Address Phone- Name of Applicant/Contact. Fax_ Address Phone I Fax PROJECT ADDRESS Phone- TYPE OF APPLICATION TYPE OF BUSINESS Date Submittal Received COMMENTS Nafc- c+v :i) JLL (L1- i Date Denied Be) -) 2 l/--e k:.u..f.t, IformslPre-Application Meeting Log,doc --fc c +'~ /)1 -02- "hj -h ~ JL~L1 ((({J~r;/i IJ JUDfe If-I L PRE-APPLICATION MEETING SIGN IN SHEET PLEASE PRINT _~ ~?HJI MEETING DATE TIME ) 50 ATTENDING FOR APPLICANT NOTICE The purpose of this conference shall be for the staff and applicant to discuss overall community goals, objectives, policies, and codes as related to the proposed development and to discuss site plan review procedures. Opinions expressed at the pre-application conference are not binding for formal review purposes. Additional staff comments may be forth coming based on actual plans submitted for review 11 ~K- ~(lr\j /f2 ~ ()?~I CJ/eA/l ' /