The URL can be used to link to this page

APPLICATION SHUTTS ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW & Bow!:.." GARY M. BAGllEBTER KATRINA D. BAKER ARNOLD L. BERMAN JOSEPH D. BOLTON CHRISTOPHER W BOYETT BOWMAN BROWN P.A. ANDREW M. BRUMBY JUDtTH A. BURKE THOMAS P CALLAN SHEILA M. CESARANO JOHN S. CHOWNING. P A. STEVEN L. CHUDNOW JONATHAN COHEN KEVIN O. COWAN KAREN H CURTIS. P.A. LUIS A. D[ ARMAS. P.". GREGORY L. DENES KATHLEEN l. DEUTSCH JEAN-CHARLES CIBSS LI N DA W 01 LLMAN JAMES r DURHAM. IT CHARLES ROBINSON F'AWSETT P.A ESTEBAN A. FERRER ROBERT G. FRACASSO JR. ROBERT A. FREYER ROGER FFUEOBAUER WILLIAM J. GAlLW~ m STEPHEN B. GILLMAN P.". ROBERT BLAIR GOLDMAN AN DREW L. GORDON MICHAEL L. GORE JODI M GRESS ROBERT E. GUNN P A. JOHN K. HARRIS. JR. (A PARTNERSHI P I NClUOING PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS) 20 NORTH ORANGE AVENUE SUITE 1000 ORLANDO FLORIDA 32801 TELEPHONE (407) 423 3200 TELECOPIER (407) 42S 8316 FRANK B SHUTTS 11870 1947' CRATE D BOWEN 11871 19S9) May 23, 1994 Ms Tambri Heyden Acting Planning and Zoning Director City of Boynton Beach Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re Quantum Park DR! Amendment Dear Tambri Please 19, 1994 in of the city for Quantum JGW/smw cc Andy Juster ORLANDO 68487 1 cae EDMUND T HENRY ill DON L. HORN MARY RUTH HOUSTON YO LAN DA CASH JACKSON WILLIAM N. JACOBS THOMAS H JUSTICE. m MARVIN A. KIRSNER. P... JOHN T KOLINSKI JEFFREY WI LANDAU RICHARD M LESLI E. P A. MA.XINE M. LONG DON A. LYNN. P.A. LEE D. MACKSON ANTONIO MARTINEZ. JR.. P.A. WILlIA"" G. MCCULLOUGH JOSEPH F MCSORLEY JOHN E. MEAGHER ARTHUR.J MENOR ROBERT O. MILLER ALAN I M ISHAEL C. RICHARD MORGAN TIMOTHY J. MURPHY PHtLLlP G. NEWCOMM P A- LOUIS NOSTRO JAMES M O'CONNELL LISA 0 O'NEILL HAROLD E. F=>>ATRICOFF JR. STEPHEN L PERRONE. P.A. GEOFFREY RANDALL SALLY M. RICHARDSON L1ZA RISO MARGARET A. ROLANDO P.. RAUL.J. SALAS ROSEMARIE N. SANCERSON.5CHADE. P... WRITER'S DIRECT LINE ROBERT A. SAVILL. P,.. ALFRED G. SMITH WILLIAM F SMITH. P... ROBERT C. SOMMERVILLE. P.A. STEPHEN S. STALLINGS KAREN L. STETSON KIMARIE R. STRATOS. P... XAVIER L. SUAREZ ANDREW P TETZELI ROBERT E. VENNEY M. THERESE VENTO BRENTON N VER PLOEG. P A. BARBARA E. VICEVICH P.A. ROBERT A. WAI NGER. M.D. J. DONALD WASIL DANIEL J WEIDMANN ROBERT WEXLER JOkN 8. WHITE. P A. JAMES G. WILLARD SCOTT G. WILLIAMS LAWRENCE D. WI NSON LETITIA E. WOOD. P A. KENNETH W WRIGkT OF COUNSEL JORDAN BITTEL. P A. JOHN R. DAY P.A. ROO JONES MARSHAll J. LANGER. P.A. JON MILLS PRESTON L. PREVATT find enclosed a check the amount of review fee for Corporate Park from Quantum Associates dated May $3,683 76, representing payment in full processing of the recent DRI Amendment Very truly yours, ~ I !?5i994 o FLORIDA OFFICES KEY LARGO MIAMI ORLANDO WEST PALM BEACH EUROPEAN OFFICE AMSTERDAM THE NETHERLANDS ~ %e City of 'Boynton 'Beach /.~ ~ - , ~ , ~ . I - It I \ Ilf ,I '~~j 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadr. '1Joulevartf P,O. 'Bo~310 'Boynton 'Bead", ~Coritfa. 33425-0310 City 9Ia1l. (407) 375-6000 !JJtx. (407) 375-6090 April 19, 1994 VIA FACSIMILE (407)425-8316 Mr James Willard Shutts and Bowen 20 North Orange Avenue - Suite 1000 Orlando, FL 32801 ~ RE Quantum Park MPMD #94-001 (DRI Amendment for High School) Dear Jim As indicated to you when you submitted the "Notice of Proposed Change" for Quantum Park, the application fee for this request would be billed after staff completed its review The total application fee has now been calculated and is swnmarized as follows Cost of advertising- Public Hearing for substantial deviation determination - Public Hearing for Ordinance - Cost of staff review time - Building Department- Engineering Department- Fire Department - Forester/Environmentalist - Legal Department - Planning and Zoning - Police - Public Works Department - Recreation and Parks Department - Utilities Department - $434 14 $392 91 $41 23 $3,249.62 $60 05 $303.75 $1,569 73 $76.61 $22.20 $948 09 $101 41 $22 66 $35.53 $109 59 Total - $3,683.76 ~merit.a s (jateway to tlie (julfstream Mr. James Willard DRI Amendment for High School Page Two - This total amount is due immediately, therefore please submit a check to the Planning and Zoning Department, payable to the City of Boynton Beach. Thank you for your cooperation. J~ .00:Ji.A,., Tambri J. He~~~t/~ Acting Planning and Zoning Director TJH/cmc A: DRIAMEND xc Scott Miller, City Manager Carrie Parker, Assistant City Manager i. I. a l" ~.. - Ilr.' \ l) KEITH and Sc. ...NARS, P.A ENGINEERS-PLANNERS-SURVEYORS --.-...--.... --- Apnl 4, 1994 Joe StallsmIth, P.E. Duector of Civil Engineering Melvin Simon and Associates Post Office Box 7033 IndIanapolis, Indiana 46207 RE. Intersection Operational Analysis at Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard Quantum Corporate Park DRI Our Proiect Number 14344.00.00001 Dear Mr Stallsmith. Please find enclosed, the operational analysis and back-up supporting materials that have been prepared to analyze whether or not signalization is required at the liT" intersection of Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard, due to the proposed high school site. This analysis was performed based upon the request made by the City of Boynton Beach, due to the potential closure of High Ridge RoadlPark Ridge Road as reflected on the preliminary site plan for the proposed high school site. A detailed description of the information prepared in the enclosed Attachments I. n and ill of this submittal, is provided below Attachment I - Trio Generation and Proiected Turnine: Movements This section includes detailed inbound and outbound AM and PM peak hour trip generation information generated by the proposed high school site, at the intersection of Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard. The inbound turning movements at this intersection have been identified as westbound left and eastbound right. The outbound turning movements at this intersection have been identified as northbound left and northbound right. Existing AM and PM peak hour eastbound and westbound through movements have been determined at the intersection of Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard, based upon field data collected by Keith and Schnars, P.A. on February 2, 1994 at the intersection of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard. No obstructions exist along Gateway Boulevard between Park Ridge Road and High Ridge Road, therefore accurate eastbound and westbound traffic counts at Park Ridge Road were easily achieved. 6500 North Andrevvs Avenue Ft Lauderdale FL 33309-2132 (305) 776 1616 Fax (305) 771 7690 , Joseph Stallsmith. P.E. Quantum Corporate Park DR! April 4. 1994 - Page 2 An itemized descnption of the tables and worksheets included m Attachment I is provIded below. Table I AM peak hour tnp generauon for unbuilt parcels which access Park Ridge Road, south of Gateway Boulevard (including the proposed high schoo!). Table IT PM peak hour lOp generation for unbuilt parcels which access Park Ridge Road, south of Gateway Boulevard (including the proposed high schoo!). Table ill AM peak hour turning movements for existing conditions plus the proposed high school, at the intersection of Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard. Table IV PM peak hour turning movements for existing conditions plus the proposed high school, at the intersection of Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard. Attachment II - AM and PM Peak Hour Unsie:nalized Intersection Analvses Intersection analyses have been performed for both the AM and PM peak hour, incorporating the proposed high school traffic on top of existing eastbound and westbound AM and PM peak: hour through movements at the intersection of Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard. The unsignalized intersection analysis module from HeS was utilized to determine whether or not acceptable levels of service could be maintained without signalized control. An itemized description of the worksheets reflecting the unsignalized analyses is provided below' Worksheet I HCS Unsignalized Analysis for existing AM peak: hour traffic conditions with the addition of the proposed high school. Worksheet IT HCS Unsignalized Analysis for existing PM peak: hour traffic conditions with the addition of the proposed high school. Attachment ill - AM and PM Peak Hour Si.e:nallzed Intersection Analvses The signalized intersection analysis module from HCS was then utilized to evaluate AM and PM peak: hour operating conditions with signalized control. An itemized description of the worksheets reflecting the signalized analyses is provided below' Worksheet m HCS SIgnalized Analysis for existing AM peak: hour traffic conditions with the addition of the proposed high school. Worksheet IV Hes Signalized Analysis for existing PM peak hour traffic conditions with the addition of the proposed high school. ;I~.S~ KEIT~ an~f SC~~A~~, P -\ -' Joseph Stallsmith, P.E. Quantum Corporate Park DRI April 4, 1994 - Page 3 The enclosed AM and PM peak hour intersection analyses at Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard reflect the following levels of service (LOS). AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Unsignalized Existing LOSF LOSE Plus School (northbound left) (northbound left) Signalized Existing LOS A LOS A Plus School The intersection analyses described above have been performed using the roadway geometry which exists today The enclosed analyses indicate that the installation of a signal at the intersection of Park Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard will allow acceptable levels of service to be maintained, even with the incorporation of the proposed high school site. Condition 29 from the existing development order already includes a provision that the developer shall provide signalization as needed at project entrances along Northwest 22nd Avenue (i.e. Gateway Boulevard) Condition 29 specifies maintaining a level of service "C" at this intersection, which is achieved with the incorporation of the signal. Please do not hesitate to call to more fully discuss the enclosed material. Sincerely, pple sportation Planning CSS/ct Attachments cc J ames Willard ;I~S; KE1Tl-! and SCH,~A~S,~ P "- ATTACHMENT I TRIP GENERATION AND PROJECTED TURNING MOVEMENTS -' TABLB I QUANTUM CORPORATB PARK DRI AM PBAK HOUR TRIP GENBRATION FOR UNBUILT PARCELS WHICH ACCBSS PARK RIDGE ROAD. SOUTH OF GATEWAY BOULEVARD -.-.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------. ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- UNBUILT FUTURE DEVBLOPMENT PARCELS LAND USE AM PEAK PARCBL HOUR ACREAGE TRIPS IN OUT General Light Industrial lRlDI [1] 1 22 9 8 2 SUBTOTALS 1 22 9 8 2 Office [2] 3 60 59 53 7 3 90 64 57 7 4.41 73 65 8 SUBTOTALS 11 91 197 175 22 **************************************** *********************** *******'***"***'* SUBTOTALS (Without the School I 13 13 206 183 23 . . , I I High School (students I NIA 615 * I 418 * 191 * I I I -------.-----------------------.-------. ----------------------- I ------------------ I GRAND TOTALS (Including the Schooll 13 13 821 I 601 220 I -------------------------.--------------- -------------.------------------------------- -------------------------------------.-------------------------.----------------------- NOTES [1] AM peak hour trips for General Light Industrial Land Use (ITE Code 110) is derived fro. applying the ITE 5th Edition Trip Generation's average rate of 1 51 trips per acre to the parcel acreage The directional distribution is 831 for inbound trips and 111 for outbound trips [2] AN peak hour trips for Office Use (ITE Code 7101 is derived fro. applying an average rate of 16 50 trips per acre which is based on a total of 2,200 AN peak hour trips (see tbe attached Table 4) divided by 133 3 acres The directional distribution is 891 for inbound trips and 111 for outbound trips * AN peak bour trips is taken from Table 4 which reflects the AN peak bour trip generation for proposed conditions (including high schooll, which is based on rates from ITE 5th Edition Trip Generation Hanual Based upon the proposed site plan of the scbool, 601 of the total trips generated for the high scbool, was assuled to use tbe west access along Park Ridge Road Tbese trips are primarily student trips The directional distribution is 681 for inbound trips and 321 for outbound trips , ------- - TABLE II QUANTUM CORPORATB PARK DRI PM PBAK HOUR TRIP GBNBRATION FOR UNBUILT PARCBLS WHICH ACCBSS PARK RIDGE ROAD, SOUTH OF GATBWAY BOULEVARD -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I I I I I I I , ________________________________________ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , SUBTOTALS : **************************************** : I LAND USE General Light Industrial (RIDI [1] SUBTOTALS Office [2J SUBTOTALS (Without the School) High School (studentsl GRAND TOTALS (Including the School) : UNBUILT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PARCELS PARCEL ACRBAGE PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT 1 22 8 1 22 9 8 3 60 51 9 42 3 90 55 9 46 4 41 62 11 52 11 91 169 29 140 ********************** ****************** 13 13 118 30 148 NIA 120 * 35 * 85 * ---------------------- ----------------- 13 13 298 65 233 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES (1] PM peak hour trips for General Light Industrial Land Use (ITE Code 1101 is derived frol applying the ITE 5th Edition Trip Generation's average rate of 1 26 trips per acre to the parcel acreage The directional distribution is 121 for inbound trips and 881 for outbound trips [2J PM peak hour trips for Office Use (ITE Code 1101 is derived frol applying an average rate of 14 16 trips per acre which is based on a total ofl,888 PM peak hour trips (see the attached Table 61 divided by 133 3 acres The directional distribution is 111 for inbound trips and 831 for outbound trips * PM peak hour trips is taken frol Table 6 which reflects the PM peak hour trip generation for proposed conditions (including high school), which is based on rates frol ITE 5th Edition Trip Generation Manual Based on the proposed site plan of the school, 601 of the total trips generated for the high school was assuled to use the west access along Park Ridge Road These trips are prilarily student trips The directional distribution is 291 for inbound and 111 for outbound trips TABLE III QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK DRI AM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL INTERSECTION PARK RIDGE ROAD AND GATEWAY BOULEVARD ----------------------------------------------------- [2) INBOUND & [ 1 ) OUTBOUND EXISTING AM PK HR TOTAL TURNING T M FOR AM PK HR MOVEMENTS SCHOOL T M ----------------------------------------------------- EB L N/A N/A N/A T 1090 0 1090 R 0 251 251 WB L 0 167 167 T 882 0 882 R N/A N/A N/A NB L 0 118 118 T N/A N/A N/A R 0 79 79 SB L N/A N/A N/A T N/A N/A N/A R N/A N/A N/A NOTES [1] AM peak hour turning movement counts were performed by Keith and Schnars, P A staff during February 1994 [2] AM peak hour project trips for the proposed High School which access Park Ridge Road, south of Gateway Boulevard (see the attached Table I) are as follows Inbound Project Trips = 418 EBR = 60% WBL = 40% Outbound Project Trips = 197 NBL = 60% NBR = 40% TABLE IV QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK DRI PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL INTERSECTION PARK RIDGE ROAD AND GATEWAY BOULEVARD ----------------------------------------------------- (2 ] INBOUND & (1] OUTBOUND EXISTING PM PK HR TOTAL TURNING T.M. FOR PM PK HR MOVEMENTS SCHOOL T M ----------------------------------------------------- EB L N\A N\A N\A T 942 0 942 R 0 21 21 WB L 0 14 14 T 978 0 978 R N\A N\A N\A NB L 0 51 51 T N\A N\A N\A R 0 34 34 SB L N\A N\A N\A T N\A N\A N\A R N\A N\A N\A NOTES (1] PM peak hour turning movement counts were performed by Keith and Schnars, P A staff during February 1994 (2] PM peak hour project trips for the proposed High School which access Park Ridge Road, south of Gateway Boulevard (see the attached Table III are as follows Inbound Project Trips = 35 EBR = 60% WBL = 40% Outbound Project Trips = 85 NBL = 60% NBR = 40% ATTACHMENT II AM AND PM PEAK HOUR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSES IDRKSHEET I 1985 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTEPSECTIONS Faoe-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVEhAGE RUNNING SPEED MAJOF STREET <() PEA~ HOUR FACTOR 1 AREA POPULATION 15( )(J( )( ) NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET PAR~ RIDGE RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GATEWAY BL NAME OF THE ANALYST . ~ &S DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 04-01-1994 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. AM OTHER INFORMATION W/SCHOOL TRAFFIC ONLY INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND STOP SIGN ThAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT () 167 118 THRU 1()9() 882 o RIGHT 251 () 79 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 '") ..:.. ~.J)RKSHEET I ADJUSTMENT FACTOF\S F'aqe-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT FdGHT TURN CUF\B F\ADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GF\ADE ANGLE FOP fUGHT TURNS FOF RIGHT TURNS ------- -....--------- ------------------ ----------------- EASTBOUND 0 ()( ) 9() 20 N WESTBOUND 0 ()( ) 9() ~() N NOF\THBOUND () 00 90 ~o N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- I. SU TRUC~: S AND RV S % COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND () o (I WESTBOUND o () o NORTHBOUND () () () SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS -------------------------------------------------------~-------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -------------- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.50 5 50 0 ()o 5 50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5 50 5 50 (I ( )() 5 50 MINOR LEFTS NB 7 o(l 7.()o (J O() 7 ( )() IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET DATE ANb TIME OF THE ANALYSIS OTHEh INFOF\MATION W/SCHOOL PAF~. RIDGE RD GATEWAY BL 04-01-1994 AM TF\AFFIC ONLY mRKSHEET I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page--:: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED F\ESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c: (pcph) c (pcph) c: = c - 0./ LOS p M SH R SH ------- --------- -..--------- ------______00 ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 13() 87 75 5()9 1'":> ..:.. 1'":> ..:.. -118 509 509 42~ F A MAJOR STREET WE< LEFT 184 209 209 209 25 E IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS OTHER INFORMATION W/SCHOOL PARK RIDGE RD GATEWAY BL ()4-()1-1994 ; AM TRAFFIC ONLY IDRKSHEET II 1985 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Faoe-_ ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED MAJOR STREET. 30 FEM HOUR FACTOR 1 AF\EA POPULATION 15( )( )( l<J NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . PAR~ RIDGE RD NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET GATEWAY BL NAME OF THE ANALYST . ~. 8<S DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy). 4-4-94 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED . PM OTHER INFORMATION W/SCHOOL TRAFFIC ONLY INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------------------------------------------------~-------- EB WB NB SB LEFT () 14 51 THRU 942 978 () RIGHT 21 n 34 NUMBER OF LANES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 2 '":> ..:.. ~. ..:.. mRKSHEET II ADJUSTMENT FACTORS F'aqe-:2 .---------.----------------------------------..-----.--.------------------- FERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB F\ADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LAI'..IE GRADE ANGLE FOF: RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- _ _________ _,.__'___"M_ ------------ EASTBOUND 0 ( )( I 90 2() N WESTBOUND 0 00 9() 2(} N NORTHBOUND 0 ()( ) 9() ~o N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION ------.--------------------------------------------------------------- /. SU TRUC~.S AND RV S /. COMBINATION VEHICLES /. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND o o () WESTBOUND () o n NORTHBOUND (> o () SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAh VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST FINAL (Table 1()-2 ) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -------------- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOR RIGHTS NB 5 50 5 50 () 00 5.50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5 50 5 5() 0 ()( ) 5 50 MINOR LEFTS NB 7 (l( ) 7 ()O (> ()( } 7 O() IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS OTHER INFORMATION W/SCHOOL PAR~. RIDGE RD. GATEWAY BL 4-4-94 PM TF\AFFIC ONLY .-' l-DRKSHEET II CAFACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-:; --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS p M SH R SH ------- --------- --------- ------------- ------------- MINOF STREET NB LEFT 56 75 T! T! 17 E RIGHT 37 641 641 641 6C14 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 15 348 348 348 ::::32 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. OTHER INFORMATION . W/SCHOOL PAR~, RIDGE RD. . GATEWAY BL .. 4-4-94 ; PM TRAFFIC ONLY ATTACHMENT III AM AND PM PEAK HOUR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSES HCI'1 S I G"h~L I ZED I NTEFSECT J SUI'11'1AR't Center For M1crocomDuters ~tDRKSHEET III ()4.- i4-1~9'1 In Transportation ------------.----..----.-.---------------.-------------_._----_._---------~------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Streets (E-W) FAR~ F\IDGE RD Ana 1 '1st ~..~~S Area T/pe Other Comment EXISTING+SCHOOL TRAFFIC (N-S) GATEWAY BLVD File Name F~QWAM HC~ 4-4-94 A 1'1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound : L T R Westbound : L T F\ Northbound : L T R Southbound I L T R 1___- ---- ---- ____1___- ____1___- I J I No Lanes < 1 1 ,.., 1 1 ..:.. Volumes 1()9() 251: 167 882 118 79: L.ane Width 1~ 0 1~ () I 1~ () 12 0 : 12 (> 12 Of RTOR Vols 0: 0: Of Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 '":> 4 I 5 6 7 8 .<.. - EB Left :NB Left * Thru * Thru Right * Right * Peds Peds WB Left * * :SB Left Thru * ThrLl Right Right Peds Peds NB Right * :EB Right SB Right :WB Right Green 4.(>A 37.ClA :Green 8 CIA Yellow/A-R 4 0 5.0 :Yellow/A- 4 CI Lost Time 3.(J 3.0 :Lost Time 3.() Cycle Length: 62.0 secsF'hase combination order #1 #~ #5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- EB T ;;550 5643 CI 36 0 63 < 6 A < 5 A -' R 10()6 1599 () 26 0.63 3 < A WB L 144 1787 0 44 0.76 < 5 A 3.7 A T 2366 3762 0.41 () 63 < 8 A NB L 259 1787 () 48 () 15 19 6 C 16 2 C R 438 1599 0 19 () 27 11 1 B Intersection Delal = 4 5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = A Lost Time/Cycle~ L = 6 0 sec Critical v/c( ) = () 402 IDRKSHEET N I-iCI"1 SIGNAL I ZED I NTEPSECT I ul\l SUMMf~RY ()L"j.-OL"j.- .1994 Center For Microcomouters In Transoortation ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Streets (E-W) PAR~ hIDGE RD Analyst ~.,~~S Area Tvpe Other Comment EXISTING+SCHOOL TRAFFIC iN-S) GATEWAY BLVD File Name F~QWAM HC9 4-4-94 PM ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eastbound T R Westbound L T F\ : L Northbound T F\ Southbound :' L T R : L 1___- I ____1___- I ____'___- No Lanes Volumes Lane Width RTOR Vols ~ -' 1 1 21: 14 1~ n: 12 0 n: '":> ..:.. 1 51 94~ 1~ () 978 12 () :12 n (I: Signal Operations F hase Combination 1 2 ~ 4 '- EB Left NB Left Thru * ThrLI Right * Right Peds Peds WB Left * SB Left Thru * Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right :EB Right SB Right :WB F.ight Green 43 CIA : Green Yellow/A-R 5 0 :Yellow/A- Lost Time 3 () :Lost Time Cycle Length 60.CI secsPhase combination order: ____1___- 1 34: 12.() : (): 5 6 7 8 * * 8 ()A 4 () 3 Cl #1 #5 Intersection Ferformance Summary Lane Group Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delav LOS Delay LOS ----- ------- ----- ----- ----- ----- EB T 4232 5643 0.26 0.75 1 5 A 1 5 A R 1199 1599 n 02 () 75 1 2 A WB L 4()4 5:!9 0 Cl4 () 75 1 5 A 1 7 A T 2822 3762 0 38 0 75 1 7 A NB L 268 1787 n 2() 0 15 17 0 C 16 0 C R 24C1 1599 () 15 0 15 14 ~ B Intersection Delay = ,...., 2 sec/veh Intersection LOS = A ..:.. Lost Time/Cyele~ L = 6 0 see Critical v/e( = () 353 j KEITH and SC: _'J"ARS, P A ENGINEERS PLANNERS. SURVEYORS March 8, 1994 Ms. Sally Black Treasure Coast RegIonal Planning Council 3228 S.W Martin Downs Boulevard SUIte 205 Palm City, Florida 34990 Quantum Corporate Park DR! Trip Generation Information Related to the Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved DR! Our Project Number 14344.00.00001 n w rn ill RE. m _'0591 Dear Ms. Black: Please fmd enclosed, the daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation analyses prepared for the proposed change to the Quantum Corporate Park DR!. The proposed change under review consists of decreasing 30.29 acres of industrial lands, 12.56 acres of research and development lands and 3.55 acres of roads, in place of a 2,500 student high school facility located on 46.4 acres. Per the February 15, 1994 methodology meeting, agency staff from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC), Palm Beach County and the Florida Departtnent of Transportation (FDOT) requested that a trip generation analysis be performed evaluating the entire DR! area both with and without the proposed change. FDOT requested specifically that the most recent trip generation rates or formulas be used (as appropriate), from the Fifth Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Based upon these requests, Keith and Schnars, P.A. has prepared the attached Tables 1 through 6 to document the trip generation for the entire DR! both with and without the proposed change, during daily traffic conditions (Tables 1 and 2), AM peak hour traffic condItions (Tables 3 and 4) and PM peak hour traffic conditions (Tables 5 and 6) A summary of the tnp generatlon calculatlons is provided below Approved Proposed DR! Land DR! Land Timeframe Uses Uses Daily Tnps 46,737 46,585 AM Peak Hour Trips 4,528 5,153 PM Peak Hour Tnps 5,700 5,492 6500 North Andrews Avenue Ft Lauderdale FL 33309-2132 (305) 716 1616 Fax (305) 711 7690 Ms. Sally Black Quantum Corporate Park DR! March 8, 1994 - Page 2 In order to qtilize the rates or formulas from the Fifth Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, th~ approved DRI acreage for commercIal and office has been converted to square footage based upon a conservative forty (40) percent lot coverage estimate established through discussions with the City of Boynton Beach. This lot coverage is permitted within the PID (Planned Industrial Development) zoning category within the City of Boynton Beach. Based upon the tnp generation analyses, the proposed changes to the DRI land uses are anticIpated to result m fewer trips being generated as compared to the approved DRI land uses, on both a daily and PM peak hour basis. The AM trips associated with the proposed change are anticipated to be higher than that originally estimated, due to the proposed high school use. The PM peak hour timeframe however, continues to reflect the dominant peak hour for the DR! as a whole. Table 7 has been enclosed with this analysis to provide an overview of the DRI land uses approved over time, and the proposed changes related to the high school facility Per the February 15, 1994 methodology meeting, an existing and projected operational analysis of the signalized intersection of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard was requested, in light of the proposed configuration of the high school site which would limit the use of High Ridge RoadlPark Ridge Road as a through street. Data for this intersection has been collected for both the AM and PM peak hours. The operational analysis will be forthcoming under separate cover Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions regarding the enclosed information. Smcerely, CSS/ct Enclosures cc. J>k Maria Palombo, MTP Group * Dan Weisberg, Palm Beach County Morris Wiseman, FOOT Tambri Heyden, City of Boynton Beach James Willard, Shutts & Bowen Joe Stallsmith, Melvin Simon & Associates Brenda Winningham, DCA Dianne Lyons, Keith and Schnars ;I~.SE ~EITH and SC~'-; -\~S, P.~ .HBL~ 1 QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK DRi DAILY TRIP GENERATION BASED ON RATES FRO~ THE FIFTH (5TH] EDITION iTE MANuAL APPROVED LAND USES OB-l1ar-:r4 ======================~============================================================================================ TOTAL 5TH ED ITE SCALE OF 5TH EDITION ITE DAILY DRI LAND USES CODE DEVELOP~ENT DAILY TRIP FOR~ULA (RAiE) TRIPS --------------------------------- ----------- ---------------- --------------------------- --..------- COMMERCIAL 820 ;17,493 sq ft [1] LoIT) = 0 625 LnlX) + 5 985 19,744 OFFICE 710 2,322,619 sq ft 2] LolTi = 0 756 Lo(l) + ) 765 1;,129 RESEARCH l DEVELOP"ENT INDUSTRIAL 110 44 6 acres T = 42 223 (X) + 263 112 2,146 INDUSTRIAL 130 154 5 acres 62 90 tripslacre 9,718 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRAND TOTAL NIA MIA 46,737 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES [1] The scale of developlent was converted frol acres to square feet in order to apply the appropriate 5th Edition lYE forlula to derive the daily trips. A 40 percent factor, which is less than the allowed 60 percent lot coverage as defined by the City of Boynton Beach, was applied to the converted nUlber to derive a conservative scale of developlent as indicated below 29 7 acres I 43,560 sq.ft lacre X 401 FAR = 517 , 493 sq ft . [2] The scale of develop.ent was converted frol acres to square feet in order to apply the appropriate 5th Edition ITE for.ula to derive the daily trips A 40 percent factor, which is less than the allowed 60 percent lot coverage as defined by the City of Boynton Beach, was applied to the converted nUlber to derive a conservative scale of developlent as indicated below 133 3 acres I 43,560 sq ft lacre X 401 FAR = 2,322,619 sq ft =1".5= KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ': ll.:li: = EN INEERS PLANNERS S 'l/EYORS .ABLE : ~UANTUM CORPORATE PAR~ OR DAiLY TRIP GENERATiON BASE~ ~~ qATE3 FROM THE F FTH (5TH! EDIT IN ITE MANUAL PRCP~SED CaNOl. ONS ( NCLUDi~G HIGH SCHGOL i)8-Mar-94 =====================~============================================================================================ DRI LAND USES TOTAL 5TH ED iTE SCALE OF 5TH EDITION HE DAILY CODE DEVELOPMENT DAILY TRIP FORMULA (RATE) TRIPS ----------- ---------------- --------------------------- ---------- 82j) 517 ,493 sq ft [1 In(T) = 0 625 Ln(Xl + 5 985 19,744 il0 2,122,019 sq ft [2 Ln(T) = 0 756 Ln(X + 3 765 15,129 11 i) 32 0 acres T = 42 223 (Xl + 263 112 1,616 130 124 2 acres 62 90 tripslacre 7,813 530 2,500 students T = 1/[(0 420/il + 0.00027] 2,283 COI'tMERCIAL OFFICE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL HIGH SCHOOL -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BRAND TOTAL NIA NIA 46,585 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES [1] The scale of develop.ent was converted froa acres to square feet in order to apply the appropriate 5th Edition liE for.ula to derive the daily trips A 40 percent factor, which is less than the allowed 60 percent lot coverage as defined by the City of Boynton Beach, was applied t~ the converted nuaber to derive a conservative scale of developaent as indicated below 29.7 acres X 43,560 sq ft.!acre X 40X FAR = 517,493 sq ft [21 The scale of developaent "as converted froa acres to square feet in order to apply the appropriate 5th Edition ITE for.ula to derive the daily trips A 40 percent factor, which is less than the allowed 60 percent lot coverage as defined by the City of Boynton Beach, was applied to the converted nuaber to derive a conservative scale of develop.ent as indicated below 133 3 acres X 43,560 sq ft lacre X 40X FAR = 2,322,619 sq ft ;I~S; ~~~~~ San~L ~~~~~~~'E ;~~s THBL~ qUANTUM CORPORATE PARK DR! AM ?EA~ HOUR TRIP GENERATION BASED IN RATES FROM THE FIF~H (5TH EDri ON ITE ~ANUA~ APPROvED LAND USES l8-Ma r-9 a ======================~============================================================================================ DR! LAND USES 'iTH ED HE CODE SCALE OF DEVELOPPlENT 5TH EDITION ITE AM PK HR TRTP FORMULA (RATE) TOTAL AM PK HR TRIPS COPlKERCIAL 820 517.491 sa ft (1] o 84 tripsi1,OOO SQ ft aLA 435 OFFICE 71i) 2.122 61Q sq ft [2] Ln(T) = 0 777 Ln Xl + 1 674 2,200 RESEARCH & DEVELOPPlENT INDUSTRIAL 110 44 6 acres 7 51 trios/acre 335 INDUSTRIAL 130 154 5 acres 10 09 tripslacre 1,559 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BRAND TOTAL NIA NIA 4,528 ==================================================================================================================== NOiES BLA Bross leasable Area [1] The scale of developlent was converted frol acres to square feet in order to apply the appropriate 5th Edition ITE forlula to derive the A" Peak Hour trips A 40 percent factor, which is less than the allowed 60 percent lot coverage as defined by the City of Boynton Beach, was applied to the converted nUlber to derive a conservativ~ scale of developlent as indicated below 29 7 acres X 4J,560 sq ft lacre X 401 FAR = 517,493 sq ft [2J The scale of developlent was converted frol acres to square feet in order to apply the appropriate 5th Edition liE for.ula to derive the A" Peak Hour trips A 40 percent factor, which is less than the allowed 60 percent lot coverage as defined by the City of Boynton Beach, was applied to the converted nUlber to derive a conservative scale of developlent as indicated below 133 3 acres X 4J,560 sq ft lacre X 401 FAR = 2,322,619 sq ft ~I~.S~ ~~~~~ Sa_n~L ~~~~~~~'E ;~~~ TABL~ 4 QUANTUM CORPORATE PARK DRi AM ?EA~ HOUR TRIP GENERATION BASED uN RATES FROM THE FIFTH (5TH1 EDITION ITE MANUAL PROPOSED CONDiTIONS (INCLUDING HISH SCHOOL) OS-Mar-94 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL 5TH ED IT~ SCALE OF 5iH EDITION HE Ai'1 PK HR .t DRI LAND USES CODE DEVElOPIIENT AM PK HR TRIP FORIIUlA (RATE) TRIPS --------------------------------- ----------- ---------------- --------------------------- ---------- COMMERCIAL 820 517.493 sq ft [1J o 84 trips/1!000 sq ft 6LA 435 OFFICE 710 2!322,619 sq ft [21 Ln!T) = 0 777 In(XI + 1 674 2)200 RESEARCH . DEVELOPIIENT INDUSTRIAL 110 32 04 acres 7 51 trips/acre 241 ... INDUSTRIAL 130 124 21 acres 10 09 trips/acre 1)253 HI6H SCHOOL 530 2,500 students o 41 trips/students 1,025 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRAND TOTAL M/A M/A 5,153 ==================================================================================================================== NOTES GLA Gross leasable Area [IJ The scale of developlent was converted frol acres to square feet in order to apply the appropriate 5th Edition ITE forlula to derive the A" Peak Hour trips A 40 percent factor, which is less than the allowed 60 percent lot coverage as defined by the City of Boynton Beach) was applied to the converted nUlber to derive a conservative scale of develop.ent as indicated below 29 7 acres X 43,560 sq ft lacre X 40% FAR = 517)493 sq ft [2] The scale of developlent was converted frol acres to square feet in order to apply the appropriate 5th Edition ITE forlula to derive the A" Peak Hour trips A 40 percent factor, which is less than the allowed 60 percent lot coverage as defined by the City of Boynton Beach) was applied to the converted nUlber to derive a conservative scale of developlent as indicated below 133 3 acres X 43,560 sq ft lacre X 40% FAR = 2,322)019 sq ft U~.S; ~~::~ San~L ~~~~~~~'E ~~~~ 'ABLE :; ~UANTliM CORPORATE PAR~' DR PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATiON BASED IN RATES FROM THE F FTH (5TH! EDITiON iTE MANUAL APPROVED LAND USES 06-i1ar-94 ======================~============================================================================================ DRI LAND USES 5TH ED ITE CODE SCALE OF DEVELOPI'lENT 5TH EDITION ITE PM PK HR TRIP FORMULA (RATEl TOTAL PM PK HR TRIPS COIIIIERCiAL 820 517,493 sq ft [11 LnlT = 0 637 .n(Xi + ) 153 1,570 OFFICE 710 2,)22,619 sq ft 2J Ln(T; = 0 7)7 Ln(X) + 1 831 1,888 RESEARCH , DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIAL 110 44 6 acres 7 26 trips acre 324 INDUSTRIAL 130 154 5 acres 10 48 trips/acre 1,619 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRAND TOTAL NIA NIA 5,700 ==================================================================================================================== NOTES GlA Gross Leasable Area [1] The scale of developlent was converted frol acres to square feet in order to apply the appropriate 5th Edition ITE forlula to derive the PK Peak Hour trips A 40 percent factor, which is less than the allowed 60 percent lot coverage as defined by the City of Boynton Beach, was applied to the converted nUlber to derive a conservative scale of developlent as indicated below 29 7 acres X 43,560 sq ft lacre X 40% FAR = 517 ,493 sq ft [2] The scale of developlent was converted frol acres to square feet in order to apply the appropriate 5th Edition ITE forlula to derive the PK Peak Hour trips A 40 percent factor, which is less than the allowed 60 percent lot coverage as defined by the City of Boynton Beach, was applied to the converted nUlber to derive a conservative scale of developlent as indicated below 133 3 acres X 43,560 sq ft lacre X 40% FAR = 2,322,619 sq ft =I".S= KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ':: ll.:~ = ENGINEERS PL.l>.NNERS-SURVEYORS T~BL: 6 lUANTUM CORPORATE PARK JR ?~ ?EAK HOUR TRIP GENERATiON SASEn IN qA~ES FROM THE FIFTH (~TM1 EDITION TE MANUAL PROPOSED CONDITIONS INCLUDiNG HIGH SCHOOL I OB-l'lar-94 ======================~============================================================================================ TOTAL 5TH ED ITE SCALE OF 5TH EDmON ITE PM PK HR DRI LAND USES CODE DEVELOPMENT PM PK HR TRIP FORMULA (RATE) TRIPS --------------------------------- ----------- ----,.----------- --------------------------- ---------- COMMEREIAL 820 517.491 sq ft (1 Lo(T) = 0 637 Ln(X) + 3 553 1,B70 OFFICE i 1~) 2,322,619 sq ft [2] LoIT) = 0 717 Ln(XI + 1 831 1,BBB RESEARCH ~ DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIAL 110 32 04 acres 7 26 trips/acre 233 INDUSTRIAL 130 124 21 acres 10 48 trips/acre 1,302 HIGH SCHOOL 530 2,500 students o 08 tripslstudents 200 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRAND TOTAL MIA MIA 5,492 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES [1] The scale of developlent was converted frol acres to square feet in order to apply the appropriate 5th Edition ITE forlula to derive the PK Peak Hour trips A 40 percent factor, which is less than the allowed 60 percent lot coverage as defined by the City of Boynton Beach, was applied to the converted nUlber to derive a conservative scale of developlent as indicated below 29 7 acres X 43,560 sq ft lacre X 40% FAR = 517,493 sq ft [2] The scale of developlent was converted frol acres to square feet in order to apply the appropriate 5th Edition ITE forlula to derive the PK Peak Hour trips A 40 percent factor, which is less than the allowed 60 percent lot coverage as defined by the City of Boynton Beach, was applied to the converted nueber to derive a conservative scale of developeent as indicated below 133 3 acres X 43,560 sq.ft lacre X 40% FAR = 2,322,619 sq ft =1".5= KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ': ~~ ': ENGINEERS PLANNERS-SURVEYORS ,ABL:: ~ QUANTUM CORPORATE ?ARK uRi LAND AREA TABUL~TION AS AMENDED AND PROPOSED t)S-Mar-94 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------,------------------------ I -------------------------------------- ACREAGE -------------------------------- ORIGINAL APPROVED ADA/DRI REV 11 REV 12 REv 13 PROPOSED (ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE REVISION INCREASE! CATEGORY 84-51) 86-11 ) 86-37\ 88-3) 1994 DECREASE -------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- COMMERCIAL Club o 0 ') 4 3 4 ') 4 3 4Q Other 27 6 27 0 26 '\ 26 - 26 30 ) -------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- SUBTOTAL 27 6 30 4 29 7 2'1 7 29 70 Nie OFFICE 128 9 133 1 133 7 133 3 133 30 NIC RESEARCH AND DEVELOP"ENT o 0 53.3 46 2 44 6 32 04 -12 56 INDUSTRIAL 254 7 144 3 153 1 154 5 124 21 -30 29 GOVERN"ENT/INSTITUTION 0.0 o 0 o 0 o 0 46 40 46 40 OPEN SPACE LAKES 76 4 50 3 50 3 43 5 43 50 DETENTION o 0 o 0 o 0 13 1 13 10 WETLANDS 5 B 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 00 OPEN o 0 48 6 43 9 37 6 37 60 -------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- SUBTOTAL 82 2 104 9 100 2 100 2 100 20 HIC SAND PINE o l) 40 0 40 0 40 0 40 00 NIC ROADS 46 5 33 9 37 0 37 6 34 05 -3 55 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- TOTAL 539 9 539 9 539 9 539 9 539 9 N/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTES NIC - No Change =1".5= KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ; lI.:~; ENGINEERS PLANNERS-SURVEYORS